alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 37.850 Should I require recipients to mark data?

To protect the recipient's interests in data, your TIA should require the recipient to mark any particular data that it wishes to protect from disclosure with a legend identifying the data as licensed data subject to use, release, or disclosure restrictions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,823
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                       736
<INVENTORY>                                     35,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,714
<PP&E>                                         189,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,669
<BONDS>                                         48,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,328
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,917
<SALES>                                        193,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,706
<CGS>                                          147,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,446
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,735
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21




                                SUBSIDIARIES OF
                          AMERICAN CLASSIC VOYAGES CO.




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Jurisdiction Under    Percentage
     Name of Subsidiary             Which Organized     of Ownership
     ------------------            ------------------   ------------
<S>                                     <C>                 <C>
The Delta Queen Steamboat Co.           Delaware            100%
DQSB II, Inc.                           Delaware            (1)
Cruise America Travel, Inc.             Delaware            (1)
Great River Cruise Line, L.L.C.         Delaware            (2)
Great Ocean Cruise Line, L.L.C.         Delaware            (2)
Great AQ Steamboat, L.L.C.              Delaware            (2)

Great Hawaiian Cruise Line, Inc.        Delaware            100%
Great Independence Ship Co.             Delaware            (3)
Great Constitution Ship Co.             Delaware            (3)
Great Hawaiian Properties Corporation   Delaware            (3)
American Hawaii Properties Corporation  Delaware            (3)
CAT II, Inc.                            Delaware            (3)
</TABLE>

       (1) 100% owned subsidiaries of The Delta Queen Steamboat Co.
       (2) 99% owned subsidiaries of The Delta Queen Steamboat Co.
       (3) 100% owned subsidiaries of Great Hawaiian Cruise Line, Inc.
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

# CERTIFICATION

(Certification of CEO
of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Annual Report of Scitex Corporation Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Yahel Shachar,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       
          The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2005

| |  | /S/ Yahel Shachar
Yahel ShacharChief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
### SUBCHAPTER II—INTERSTATE COMMERCE
#### SALGADO v. JOYNER MANAGEMENT SERVICES

No. 438P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 209

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997.
#### §§ 750.56-750.60 [Reserved]
ACCEPTED

12-14-00310-CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

2/27/2015 3:25:29 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 2/27/2015 3:25:29 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ERIE
FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS DATED JUNE 30, 1998 AND ARE QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       615,409,210
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                 113,648,093
<MORTGAGE>                                   9,981,163
<REAL-ESTATE>                                1,582,876
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             762,568,951
<CASH>                                      17,470,343
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              86,404
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      67,379,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             872,868,037
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            644,000,247
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            161,630
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,078,953
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        3,665,428
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,410,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 168,347,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               872,868,037
<PREMIUMS>                                  18,814,398
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         25,785,740
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           2,702,270
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 389,533
<BENEFITS>                                  22,927,052  
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,645,951
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         3,484,959
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,633,979
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,571,824
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,062,155
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,062,155
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        


</TABLE>
§ 553.44 Eligibility for interment and inurnment in the West Point Post Cemetery. The following persons are eligible for interment and inurnment in the West Point Post Cemetery, unless otherwise prohibited as provided for in §§ 553.46 through 553.48, provided that the last period of active duty of the service member or veteran ended with an honorable discharge or characterization of honorable service for active duty deaths. ( a ) *Primarily eligible persons for interment or inurnment.* The following are primarily eligible persons for purposes of interment or inurnment: ( 1 ) A graduate of the USMA, provided the individual was a U.S. citizen, both as a cadet and at the time of death, and whose military service fulfilled one of the following criteria. ( i ) The graduate's service in the Armed Forces of the United States, if any, terminated honorably.
( ii ) The graduate's service in wartime in the Armed Forces of a nation that was allied with the United States during the war terminated honorably.
( 2 ) Members of the Armed Forces of the United States, including USMA cadets, who were on active duty at the USMA at time of death and their derivatively eligible person dependents who may have died while the service member was on active duty at the USMA.
( 3 ) Members of the Armed Forces of the United States who were on active duty at the USMA at time of retirement.
( 4 ) Members of the Armed Forces of the United States whose last active duty station prior to retirement for physical disability was the USMA. However, personnel (not otherwise eligible) who are transferred to the Medical Holding Detachment, Keller Army Hospital, for medical boarding or medical disability retirement are not, regardless of length of time, eligible for interment or inurnment in the West Point Cemetery or Columbarium.
( 5 ) Officers appointed as Professors, USMA.
( b ) *Derivatively eligible persons.* Derivatively eligible persons are those connected to an individual described in paragraph (a) of this section through a relationship described in § 553.43(b). Such individuals may be interred or inurned if space is available in the primarily eligible person's gravesite or niche.
( c ) *Temporary restrictions.* The Secretary of the Army or his designee may, in special circumstances, impose temporary restrictions on the eligibility standards for the USMA cemetery. If temporary restrictions are imposed, they will be reviewed annually to ensure the special circumstances remain valid for retaining the temporary restrictions.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of Robert Half
International Inc. (the Form 10-K), I, Harold M. Messmer, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Robert Half International Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1.    The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Robert Half International Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Robert Half International Inc. and will
be retained by Robert Half International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                  |  |                                                                              
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|February 19, 2008 |  | /s/ Harold M. Messmer, Jr.                                                   
|                  |  | Harold M. Messmer, Jr. Chief Executive Officer Robert Half International Inc.
(May 26, 1964)

#### In the Matter of Harold F. Cullen et al., Appellants, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Bernard Hirschhorn et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law: (1) to invalidate petition designating Bernard Hirschhorn and others as candidates of the Democratic party in the primary election to be held June 2, 1964 for certain stated party positions in the Seventh Assembly District, Queens County; and (2) for other related relief, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 21, 1964 after a nonjury trial, which denied the application and dismissed the proceeding. Judgment modified on the law and the facts by striking out its decretal paragraph denying *in. toto*the petitioners’ application to invalidate the designating petition; and by substituting therefor the following two provisions: (1) a provision granting the application to the extent of invalidating the designating petition with respect to all the respondent designees other than Bernard Hirseh•horn and Pauline Cieehowski; and (2) a provision denying the application to the extent that it seeks to invalidate the designating petition with respect to the respondent designees Bernard Hirschhorn and Pauline Cieehowski. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. The findings of fact which may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. It is true that the record discloses that there were many irregularities incident to this designating petition and that some of the designees either participated in such irregularities or had knowledge of them. However, the record also clearly establishes that the designees Bernard Hirschhorn and Pauline Cieehowski neither participated in such irregularities • nor had any knowledge of them. Hence, as to said designees Hirschhorn and Cieehowski, the application to .invalidate the petition should be denied and designating petition sustained as to them (cf. *Matter of Lefkowitz*v. *Cohen,*262 App. Div. 452, affd. 286 N. Y. 499). Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Ughetta, Acting P, J. and Hill, J., dissent as to the modification, and vote to reverse the judgment *in toto*and to grant the application as to all the designees, with the following memorandum: By reason of the gross irregularities employed in obtaining and affixing signatures, we find that the designating petition not only violated the Election Law but that it was saturated with errors and omissions, if not fraud. When a petition is so permeated with irregularities and error there can be no severance; the entire petition must fall (cf. *Matter of Burns [Sullivan],*199 Misc. 1005, affd. 278 App. Div. 1023, affd. 303 N. Y. 601).
#### PEOPLE ex rel. DE BELPRAT, Respondent, v. COLE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 30, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Alma H. De Belprat, against William J. Cole and others, composing the school board of the borough of Richmond, and others.

No opinion. Final order and order denying motion for new trial affirmed, with costs.
---

---

Exhibit 14(a)(4)

[KPMG LETTERHEAD]

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Creo Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-34233, No. 33-46861, No.
33-87614, No. 33-97622, No. 33-97624 and No. 33-39364) of Scitex Corporation Ltd. of the
following reports incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of Scitex Corporation
Ltd. on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003 :

|n | Auditors Report
to the Shareholders of Creo Inc. dated November 12, 2002, with respect to the
Consolidated Financial Statements of Creo as at September 30, 2002 and 2001 and for the
years ended September 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000 incorporated by reference in the Form 40-F
of Creo filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2003 (Form
40-F); and
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|n | Comments
by Auditor for U.S. Readers on Canada  U.S. Reporting Differences dated November
12, 2002 included in the Form 40-F.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
June 28, 2004



---

---
#### § 37.690 How are nonprofit participants to manage real property and equipment?

For nonprofit participants, your TIA's requirements for vesting of title, use, management, and disposition of real property or equipment acquired under the award are the same as those that apply to the participant's other Federal assistance awards.

[85 FR 51246, Aug. 19, 2020]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2024-0001

_____________________________

PEDRO ANDRES BRAVO,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

April 9, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

BILBREY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Robert David Malove of Robert David Malove, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
#### § 941.785 Requirements for permits for special categories of mining.

Part 785 of this chapter, *Requirements for Permits for Special Categories of Mining,* shall apply to each person who makes application for a permit to conduct certain categories of surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
#### § 536.98 Claims payable under the National Guard Claims Act.

The provisions of § 536.75 apply to claims arising under this subpart.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Postwar Employment Prospects for Women in the Hosiery Industry

              																	Frazer, Arthur W.					,	Ringel, Abraham					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Postwar Employment Prospects for Women in the Hosiery Industry : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 835*,												Washington, D.C: 								For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4305,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael W.
Zellner, hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, this Annual Report of
PMC on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 27, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.



|                        |  |                                                                         
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 24, 2010 |  | /s/ Michael W. Zellner                                                  
|                        |  | Michael W. Zellner                                                      
|                        |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
#### § 770.36 Definitions.

For purposes of these regulations, U.S. Naval installations and properties in Puerto Rico include, but are not limited to, the U.S. Naval Station, Roosevelt Roads (including the Vieques Island Eastern Annexes, consisting of Camp Garcia, the Eastern Maneuver Area, and the Inner Range); the Naval Ammunition Facility, Vieques Island; and the Naval Security Group Activity, Sabana Seca.
### §2209d. Statement of percentage and dollar amount of Federal funding

On and after October 28, 1991, the Department of Agriculture, when issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid solicitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with Federal money, all grantees receiving Federal funds, including but not limited to State and local governments, shall clearly state (1) the percentage of the total cost of the program or project which will be financed with Federal money, and (2) the dollar amount of Federal funds for the project or program.

(Pub. L. 102–142, title VII, §733, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 914.)