alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,775
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                       490
<INVENTORY>                                     19,479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,192
<PP&E>                                         172,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,144
<BONDS>                                         51,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,802
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   195,379
<SALES>                                         64,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,536
<CGS>                                           50,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,186
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,768
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,768
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
Consent to Independent Auditors




To the Stockholders and Board of Directors USMX, INC.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (No.
33-16194,  33-16195,  33-38855, 33-49392, 33-68882 and 33-63599) on Form S-8 and
registration  statement (No.  333-03561) on Form S-3 of USMX, INC. of our report
dated  March 11, 1997  relating  to the  consolidated  statements  of  financial
position of USMX,  INC. and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related  consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended  December 31,
1996,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K
of USMX, INC.

Our report  contains an  explanatory  paragraph that states that the Company has
incurred cost overruns  associated  with the  construction of the Illinois Creek
Mine,  has cash flow  deficits  from  operations  and  currently has no mines in
operation.  At December  31,  1996,  the Company has an  accumulated  deficit of
$3,065,000, a working capital deficit of approximately $27,132,000 and is not in
compliance with certain covenants of its long term debt agreements. In addition,
significant  additional  funds will be required to bring the Company's  Illinois
Creek Mine into  production.  These  matters raise  substantial  doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do no
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


                              KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 28, 1997
#### § 536.54 Joint tortfeasors.

When joint tortfeasors are liable, it is DA policy to pay only the fair share of a claim attributable to the fault of the United States rather than pay the claim in full and then bring suit against the joint tortfeasor for contribution. If payment from a joint tortfeasor is not forthcoming after the CJA's demand, the United States should settle for its fair share, provided the claimant is willing to hold the United States harmless. Where a joint tortfeasor's liability greatly outweighs that of the United States, the claim should be referred to the joint tortfeasor for action.
§ 37.115 For what purposes are TIAs used? The ultimate goal for using TIAs, like other assistance instruments used in defense research programs, is to foster the best technologies for future defense needs. TIAs differ from and complement other assistance instruments available to agreements officers, in that TIAs address the goal by fostering civil-military integration (*see* appendix A to this part). TIAs therefore are designed to: ( a ) Reduce barriers to commercial firms' participation in defense research, to give the Department of Defense (DoD) access to the broadest possible technology and industrial base.
( b ) Promote new relationships among performers in both the defense and commercial sectors of that technology and industrial base.
( c ) Stimulate performers to develop, use, and disseminate improved practices.
No. 8168.

#### The German Fire Insurance Co. *v.*Yates.

(Decided November 24, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lawrence county.

*Messrs. Johnson & Corn,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. 0. Yates,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

•Spear, Shauck and Crew, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Emil Walter Karppinen, Appellant.

Motion to dispense with printing of minutes and exhibits, granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and original exhibits. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 /s/ Keith S. WaltersKeith S. WaltersChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive OfficerDate: September 24, 2010 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
No. 8185.

#### Jones *v.*Jones.

(Decided September 29, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Scioto county.

*Mr. Nelson W. Evans*and *Mr. Frank W. Moulton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. James 8. Thomas*and *Messrs. Bannon & Ban-non,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Spear, Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew, JJ., concur.
Appeal No. 77-51.

#### Thurston L. Winston *v.*Bradford Southworth *et al.*

This case comes before the court on the motion of the plaintiff for a limited remand, since it is doubtful whether the case was heard on preliminary or permanent injunction.

*929
      *William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Barbara Hurst, John A. MacFadyen III,*Asst. Public Defenders, for plaintiff.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *George M. Cappello,*Office of Legal Counsel, Department of Corrections, for defendants.

The case is remanded to the Superior Court for the purpose of clarifying whether the case was heard on preliminary or permanent injunction. If the case was heard on permanent injunction, then it is properly appealable and will be returned to this court, forthwith. If the case was heard on preliminary injunction, it is not properly appealable in this court, at this time, and it will be retained by the Superior Court for proper proceedings. See 1 Kent, *R.I. Civ. Prac.*§65.5 at 477-78 (1969).
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.4
 PAGE 1
 Delaware
 
 The First State
 I, HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE
ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF R.H. DONNELLEY
CORPORATION, FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE THIRTY-FIRST DAY OF MARCH, A.D. 2006, AT 7:41 OCLOCK
P.M.
 A FILED COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE NEW CASTLE COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS.
 [SEAL]
    
    /s/ Harriet Smith WindsorHarriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State0788791     8100
    
    
    
    AUTHENTICATION: 4640352060309439
    
    
    
    DATE: 04-03-06




---



##### 



State of Delaware
Secretary of State
Division of Corporations
Delivered 08:26 PM 03/31/2006
FILED 07:41 PM 03/31/2006
SRV 060309439  0788791 FILE
 CERTIFICATE OF ELIMINATION
OF
CONVERTIBLE CUMULATIVE
PREFERRED STOCK
OF
R.H. DONNELLEY CORPORATION
 
 
 
 Company
 Certificate of
Incorporation Preferred Stock
 Certificate of Designations Convertible Preferred Stock
   Authorized Officers




---



##### 



[signature page follows]
 2




---



##### 



th
 R.H. DONNELLEY CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyName: Steven M. Blondy
Title: Senior Vice President and CFOATTEST:By:
    
    /s/ Robert J. BushName: Robert J. Bush
Title: Secretary
 3
# ATTACHMENT 1: CAS IES REPORT RIRIRIRI
**Exhibit 21****List of Subsidiaries**   Name State of IncorporationThe State Bank and Trust Company OhioThe Exchange Bank OhioRFCBC, Inc. OhioReliance Financial Services, N.A. * Nationally Chartered Trust CompanyRurban Mortgage Company* OhioRurbanc Data Services, Inc. OhioDiverse Computer Marketers, Inc. ** MichiganRurban Operations Corp. OhioRurban Statutory Trust I Declaration of Trust — State of ConnecticutRurban Statutory Trust II Declaration of Trust — State of Delaware ***** Reliance Financial Services, N.A. and Rurban MortgageCompany are wholly-owned subsidiaries of The State Bank and Trust Company. ** Diverse Computer Marketers, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary ofRurbanc Data Services, Inc. (“RDSI”)
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 2749 Unemployed Number in thousands 45 to 54 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU03000093Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Unemployment Level - 45-54 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:09:27 PM)
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Doron Birger, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: June 27, 2007 |  | /s/
    Doron Birger                 
|                    |  | Doron Birger                         
|                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  | (principal executive officer)        



---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 06, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 06, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0294. FRED MILANI v. KATHLEEN IRWIN et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 17CV3176 17CV3115
### §1445b–4. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title I, §107E, as added Dec. 23, 1985, Pub. L. 99–198, title X, §1005, 99 Stat. 1448, and amended, which related to payments in commodities, was renumbered section 115 of act Oct. 31, 1949, by Pub. L. 101–624, title XI, §1161(a)(1), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3520, and transferred to section 1445k of this title.
188 So. 39

#### SUCCESSION of HEINIG.

No. 35216.

April 3, 1939.

*389Walter W. Wright, of New Orleans, for. appellee Dudley C. Foley, Jr.

Robert Guerard Hughes, of New Orleans, for appellant Mrs. Johanna Schenck, wife of Charles Murphy.

LAND, Justice.

Dudley C. Foley, Jr., as agent and attorney in fact of Herman Heinig, nonresident' and husband of decedent, applied for letters of administration in the above succession, alleging that decedent, also a non-resident, had left community property and effects within the jurisdiction of the court, consisting mainly of a certain piece of real estate and rentals due thereon, and that Herman Heinig was the surviving-spouse in community; that there are debts due by the estate of the decedent, as well as debts due to the estate, and that an administration is necessary.

An opposition to the appointment of Dudley C. Foley, Jr., as administrator, was filed by Mrs. Johanna Schenck, wife of Charles Murphy, who alleged that she is a resident of the City of New Orleans; that she is a sister of decedent; that decedent left no forced heirs; that the property left by her within the jurisdiction of the court is her separate property; and that opponent, as an heir of decedent, is entitled to the administration thereof.

The opposition of Mrs. Charles Murphy was dismissed, and from the judgment appointing Dudley C. Foley, Jr., as administrator, opponent has suspensively appealed, and has executed and filed bond in the lower court, in the sum of $200, the amount fixed by the judge.

Dudley C. Foley, Jr., administrator and appellee, has moved to dismiss the appeal at the cost of appellant..

The motion to dismiss the appeal is without merit. Under articles 580 and 1059 of the Code of Practice, a suspensive appeal cannot be taken from a judgment appointing an administrator of a succession, after the determination of the necessity for the appointment by the judge.

However, a suspensive appeal from a judgment appointing an administrator, *391though not permitted under articles 580 and 1059 of the Code .of Practice, will not be .set aside, where appellant, as in the case at bar, has furnished bond in the amount fixed by the judge, but will be maintained as a devolutive appeal. Succession of Pavelka, 157 La. 480, 102 So. 579.

For the reasons assigned, it is ordered that the order of appeal herein granted from the judgment dismissing the opposition of Mrs. Johanna Schenck, wife of Charles Murphy, to the application of Dudley C. Foley, Jr., agent and attorney in fact of Herman Heinig, to be appointed administrator of the succession ot Mrs. Herman Heinig, be and is’ hereby decreed to operate devolutively and not suspensiveiy.

It is further ordered that the motion to dismiss the appeal, filed by appellee, Dudley .C. Foley, Jr., administrator, be and is hereby denied and overruled.

HIGGINS, J., absent.
<PAGE>
                                                                         10.3(b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             ROHN Industries, Inc.

                               6718 W. Plan Road
                                 P.O. Box 2000
                               Peoria, IL  61656
                                 July 24, 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                 July 24, 1998


By Hand Delivery
----------------

Mr. Richard L. Rohn
6092 Brookhill Circle
Birmingham, AL  35242

Dear Richard:

     This letter is to confirm the conversation that we had today pertaining to
compensation issues.

     I have agreed with the Chairman of the Compensation Committee not to
request an increase in the base salary for any of the Executive Officers of the
Company, including myself, until on or after January 1, 2001.  The opportunity
for increased earnings until January 1, 2001, will relate to our combined and
individual performances under the bonus plan, which as you know was modified in
March of this year to provide you with greater bonus earnings potential.

     In consideration of the above, and your continued service to the Company, I
am pleased to extend to you an additional term of your employment with ROHN
Industries, Inc. ("ROHN").  As you know, your employment is at-will and either
party may terminate the employment relationship at any time for any reason.
However, in the event that your employment were to be terminated by ROHN without
cause during the next three years, you will be entitled to a severance payment
equal to one year's base salary then in effect plus the amount of the target
bonus for the year in which termination occurred.  In the event you are
terminated for cause at any time, no severance or termination payment shall be
made. The term "cause" as used herein shall mean an act or acts of dishonesty in
the course of employment, the conviction of a felony or the failure to perform
duties or responsibilities reasonably assigned by me or the Board of Directors.

     We appreciate all that you do for ROHN and we look forward to your
continued service.

                                Very truly yours,


                                /s/ Brian B. Pemberton
                                ----------------------
                                Brian B. Pemberton
                                President & CEO

BP/tk1419
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
INCLUDED HEREIN AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                       898
<INVENTORY>                                     58,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,931
<PP&E>                                         326,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                 144,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 364,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,254
<BONDS>                                        104,491
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           195
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   364,659
<SALES>                                        616,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               616,395
<CGS>                                          557,280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  557,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   409
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (370)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,073)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,073)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Exhibit 32.1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Educational Development Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Randall W. White, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.     Date July 1, 2004 By /s/ Randall W. White     Randall W. White   President and Chief Executive Officer
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separatedocument. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 

CASE NUMBER: P08-0513

RELATED CASES: 

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS 

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX 

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 1-2 2 

KEYWORDS: 

LUNG 

IRR-MM,S,E,L 

AQUATOX-A,C 

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT 

FATE: 

 

 

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption and biodeg 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk 

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong 

PBT Potential: P1B1T1 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl 

 

HEALTH: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate 

through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on 

analogs. There is concern for irritation to eyes, skin, 

lung, and mucous membranes based on the 

properties of the PMN material and concern for lung effect 

if inhaled based on its properties. 

*CEB HEALTH: Low moderate concern (Inhalation and dermal). 

XB: No testing desired. 

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in 

mg/L (ppm) are: 

fish 96-h LC50 = 3.7 P 

daphnid 48-h LC50 = 1.6 P 

green algal 96-h EC50 = 6.8 P 

fish chronic value = 0.37 P 

daphnid ChV = 0.16 P 

algal ChV = 1.7 P 

Predictions are based on SARs for anionic ; SAR 

chemical class =

in 
 ; effective concentrations based on 

100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; 

 as CaCO3; and 

moderate concern for toxicity; 

assessment factor = 10.0 

concern concentration = 0.016 mg/L

*CEB ECOTOX: 

 

Becky Jones 564-8919
### **CHAPTER 58—POTATO RESEARCH AND PROMOTION**

Sec.
2611.
Congressional findings and declaration of policy.
2612.
Definitions.
2613.
Authority for issuance and amendment of plan.
2614.
Notice and hearings.
2615.
Finding and issuance of plan.
2616.
Regulations.
2617.
Required terms and conditions of plans.
2618.
Permissive terms and conditions of plans.
2619.
Assessments.
2620.
Procedural rights of persons subject to plan.
2621.
Enforcement.
2622.
Investigations.
2623.
Referendum.
2624.
Suspension or termination of plans.
2625.
Amendment procedure.
2626.
Separability.
2627.
Authorization.