alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    10(ii)(a)(4)

                       ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE

         THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE (this "Assignment") is entered
into as of the 1st day of January, 1998, between GREAT HAWAIIAN PROPERTIES
CORPORATION, d/b/a AMERICAN HAWAII CRUISES ("Assignor"), a Delaware corporation
and AMERICAN CLASSIC VOYAGES CO. ("Assignee"), a Delaware corporation having an
office at Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 200, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

1. Lease. The "Lease" shall mean that certain Lease Agreement dated May 30,
1995, as amended by First Amendment dated March 12, 1997, by and between Equity
Office Properties, L.L.C., as agent for beneficial owner, as Landlord, and Great
Hawaiian Properties Corporation, d/b/a American Hawaii Cruises, as Tenant.

2. Assignment. For good and valuable consideration received by Assignor, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby
assigns to Assignee the entire right, title and interest of Assignor in and to
the Lease to the extent applicable to the period from and after the date hereof.

3. Assumption. Assignee hereby assumes, and agrees to be bound by and to
perform, all of the covenants, agreements and obligations of Assignor under the
Lease as applicable to the period from and after the date hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have executed this Assignment
the day and year first written above.

                       ASSIGNOR:
                       GREAT HAWAIIAN PROPERTIES CORPORATION,
                       d/b/a American Hawaii Cruises, a Delaware corporation

                       By: /s/ Jordan B. Allen
                         -----------------------------------------------
                       Title:   Executive Vice President

                       ASSIGNEE:
                       AMERICAN CLASSIC VOYAGES CO., a Delaware corporation

                       By:  /s/ Jordan B. Allen
                         -----------------------------------------------
                       Title:   Executive Vice President

                       ACCEPTED:
                       EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES, L.L.C.,
                       as agent for beneficial owner

                       By:  
                         -----------------------------------------------
                       Title:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Dawson, Also Known as David Floyd Dawson, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted by default and appeal dismissed. Beldock, Acting P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ.
## In t he Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 24

- 00107

- CR

STEPHEN RILEY KING , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 30454

Before Stevens , C.J., van Cleef and Rambin , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION

Stephen Riley King agreed to plead guilty to three counts of aggravated sexual assault
and one count of indecency with a child by sexual contact. 1 See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN

. §§ 22.021, 21.11 (a)

. King elected to have the jury assess punishment, which resulted in prison
sentences of twenty years, eight years, five years, and two years, respectively. 2 Despite the trial
court’s certification that this was a plea

- agreement case and that he had no right of appeal, King
timely filed a notice of appeal. Because we find that we are without jurisdiction, we will dismiss
the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The Texas Legislature has granted a very limited right of appeal in plea

- bargain cases.

Rule 25.2(a) (2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure details that right as follows:

(2) . . . In a plea bargain case

— that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant

— a defendant may appeal only:

(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial,

(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appea l, or

(C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). There is no indication in the record before this Court (1) that this
specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute, (2) that King filed a motion that was ruled on

before tria l, or (3) that King obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. To the contrary, the

1 In exchange for his guilty plea, the State declined to charge King with delivery of a controlled substance to a minor and online solicitation of a minor.

2 The trial court ordered the sentences to run consecutively.3

trial court’s certification of King’s right of appeal indicates that he has no right of appeal.
Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, this Court is required to
dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court’s certification indicates that there is no right of
appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d).
On June 13, 2024, we informed King of the apparent defect in our jurisdiction over his
appeal and afforded him an opportunity to respond and, if possible, cure such defect. King did
not file a response to our June 13 correspondence.
Because King has no right of appeal due to his plea bargain with the State and because
the trial court’s certification correctly indicates that he is without a right of appeal, we dismiss
this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Jeff Rambin Justice

Date Submitted: September 9 , 2024 Date Decided: September 10 , 2024

Do Not Publish
To Whom It May Concern:

As of today, 8 May 2012, Alaska Airlines was illegally selling 

flights on their proposed Washington Reagan-San Diego service SABRE 

reservation systems, with travel beginning 13 August 2012. This, 

despite the fact that Alaska Airlines has not yet been awarded such 

service. The flights have since been removed from SABRE and can no 

longer be booked, but nonetheless Alaska Airlines must be promptly and 

appropriately disciplined for such actions, as it did attempt to sell 

and, in fact, actually sold, tickets on a flight which it does not 

government permission to fly. 

Signed,

Concern Citizen
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of ElkCorp.
 Date: November 8, 2006
    
    By
    
    /s/ Thomas D. KarolThomas D. KarolChief Executive Officer
```

[111th Congress Public Law 246]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 2622]]

Public Law 111-246
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To enable State homes to furnish nursing home care to parents any of 
whose children died while serving in the Armed Forces. <<NOTE: Sept. 30, 
                         2010 -  [H.R. 4505]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF STATE HOME CARE FOR PARENTS OF VETERANS 
                              WHO DIED WHILE SERVING IN ARMED 
                              FORCES.

    In administering section 51.210(d) of title 38, Code of Federal 
Regulations, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall permit a State home 
to provide services to, in addition to non-veterans described in such 
subsection, a non-veteran any of whose children died while serving in 
the Armed Forces.

    Approved September 30, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4505:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            June 29, 30, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### SMITH, Respondent, v. SAMPSON et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 16, 1903.)

Action by William J. Smith against John S. Sampson and Henry W. Meyer.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed by default, with costs.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUDWIN ISRAEL LOPEZ-AGUILAR,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney

General,

Respondent.

No. 17-73153

Agency No.

A074-394-680

ORDER

Filed August 29, 2019

Before: Susan P. Graber and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit

Judges, and John R. Tunheim,* District Judge.

ORDER

Petitioner’s petition for panel rehearing,Docket EntryNo.

36, is GRANTED. The opinion filed April 23, 2019, and

reported at 921 F.3d 898, is hereby withdrawn. The court

will file a new opinion in due course. Because the court’s

opinion is withdrawn, the petition for rehearing en banc is

DENIED as moot. Once a new opinion is filed, further

petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc may be filed.

* The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for

the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.
§ 631.17 Marine Corps policy. ( a ) Within CONUS. ( 1 ) Commanders may request authority from Headquarters, Marine Corps (Code POS), to establish off-installation operations— ( i ) To assist Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies within the limits imposed by higher authority and the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. 1385).
( ii ) In conjunction with military operations.
( iii ) To safeguard the health, and welfare of Marines.
( iv ) When the type of offenses or the number of service members frequenting an area is large enough to warrant such operations.
( 2 ) Constraints on the authority of military personnel to act off-installation (Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. 1385)) and the specific scope of the authority will be clearly delineated in all authorizations for off-installation operations.
( b ) Within OCONUS, off-installation operations will be kept at the minimum needed for mission accomplishment. Installation commanders may authorize off-installation operations as required by local conditions and customs, as long as they are conducted in accordance with applicable treaties and SOFAs.
( c ) Off-installation operations will be coordinated with the local installation commander through the SJA, or higher authority, and local law enforcement authorities.
( d ) Marines selected for off-installation operations must— ( 1 ) Have mature judgment and law enforcement experience.
( 2 ) Be thoroughly familiar with all applicable agreements and implementing standard operating procedures, to include the constraints of the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. 1385), in CONUS and United States-host nation agreements in OCONUS areas, as applicable.
( e ) Marines accompanying civilian police during off-installation operations do so only to enforce parts and orders pertaining to persons subject to their jurisdiction. Marines assigned off-installation operations remain directly responsible to, and under the command of their Marine superiors when accompanying civilian police. Marines performing such duties may come to the aid of civilian police in order to prevent the commission of a felony or injury to a civilian police officer.
( f ) Procedures for absentee and deserter collection units to accept an active-duty absentee or deserter from civilian authorities may be established.
( g ) Civilian police and civil court liaison may be established.
#### § 1636.7 Impartiality.

Boards may not give preferential treatment to one religion over another, and all beliefs whether of a religious, ethical, or moral nature are to be given equal consideration.
#### § 552.125 Disposition of confiscated weapons.

Commanders will maintain confiscated weapons in the unit arms room pending final disposition. They will provide written notification of the circumstances or loss or recovery of such weapons and a complete and accurate description of the weapon to Commander, I Corps and Fort Lewis, ATTN: AFZH-PMS-P, Fort Lewis, WA 98433-5000. A copy of this notification will be maintained with the weapon pending final disposition.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. OP 20-0325

LANCE GERALD DEINES,

Petitioner,

v.

LYNN GUYER, WARDEN,

MONTANA STATE PRISON,

Respondent.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Respondent’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including February 2, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

KFS

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 23 2020

12/23/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0325
#### MAYNOR v. ONSLOW COUNTY

No. 422A97

Case below: 127 N.CApp. 102

Notice of appeal by plaintiff pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed 2 October 1997.
#### CARLSON v. CARLSON

No. 434P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 87

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997.
### §1747. Authorization of appropriations; determination of value of transferred commodity

In order to make payment to the Commodity Credit Corporation for any commodities transferred to the national stockpile pursuant to section 1743(a)(4) of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated amounts equal to the value of any commodities so transferred. The value of any commodity so transferred, for the purpose of this section, shall be the lower of the domestic market price or the Commodity Credit Corporation's investment therein as of the date of transfer to the stockpile, as determined by the Secretary of Agriculture

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title I, §107, 68 Stat. 898.)
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1500 

Censuring Representative Glen Clay Higgins of the 3rd Congressional District 

of Louisiana. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. HORSFORD (for himself, Ms. PLASKETT, Mr. GOLDMAN of New York, Mr. 

VEASEY, Mrs. RAMIREZ, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mrs. FOUSHEE, Mrs. CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, Ms. KAMLAGER-DOVE, Ms. BROWN, Mr. MIKE GARCIA of California, Mrs. FLETCHER, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Ms. SEWELL, Mrs. 

HAYES, Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. 

PRESSLEY, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. MCCLELLAN, Ms. CROCKETT, 

Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. STRICKLAND, Mrs. BEATTY, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. CARSON, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. 

JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. FROST, 

Mr. AMO, Ms. OMAR, Mr. CARTER of Louisiana, Ms. WATERS, Ms. BUSH, 

Ms. LEE of Pennsylvania, Ms. UNDERWOOD, and Mr. BOWMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ethics 

RESOLUTION 

Censuring Representative Glen Clay Higgins of the 3rd 

Congressional District of Louisiana. 

Whereas, on September 25, 2024, Representative Glen Clay 

Higgins used his official account on X to publicly slander, insult, and demean all Haitians and Haitian Americans in an overtly racist post, referring to Haiti as the 

‘‘nastiest country in the Western Hemisphere’’, falsely 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1500 IH 

accusing Haitians of eating pets, denigrating Haitians as 

‘‘slapstick gangsters’’ and ‘‘thugs’’, and threatening Haitians to ‘‘get their mind right and their ass out of our 

country before January 20th’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the House of Representatives censures Glen 

3 Clay Higgins, Representative of the 3rd Congres4 sional District of Louisiana; 

5 (2) Representative Glen Clay Higgins will forth6 with present himself in the well of the House of 

7 Representatives for the pronouncement of censure; 

8 and 

9 (3) Representative Glen Clay Higgins will be 

10 censured with the public reading of this resolution 

11 by the Speaker. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1596 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1596

 Recognizing November 30, 2024, as Yom Haplitim or Jewish Refugee Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 2024

  Ms. Wasserman Schultz submitted the following resolution; which was 
  referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
 Committees on Education and the Workforce, and Foreign Affairs, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing November 30, 2024, as Yom Haplitim or Jewish Refugee Day.

Whereas November 30 is commemorated as ``Yom Haplitim'', otherwise known as 
        ``Jewish Refugee Day'';
Whereas November 30 is marked as a day of recognition for the 900,000 Jewish 
        people who were exiled from the Arab world during the early years of the 
        State of Israel;
Whereas Jewish people lived continuously in North Africa, the Middle East, and 
        the Gulf region for over 2,500 years;
Whereas Jewish people were subjected to societal and political discrimination 
        and denigration over generations but persevered as citizens who 
        contributed significantly to the culture and development of Egypt, 
        Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Morocco, and several other Arab and 
        Muslim-majority countries;
Whereas, in the wake of World War II and the Arab-Israeli War of 1948, entire 
        Jewish communities were forced from the countries in which they had 
        lived for millennia;
Whereas many refugees fleeing in the wake of war became citizens of Israel, and 
        they and their descendants are an indispensable part of Israeli society;
Whereas many Jewish refugees also migrated to the United States, where they have 
        made meaningful contributions to our Nation's culture and history; and
Whereas the Congress continues to support the security of the State of Israel 
        and the Jewish people around the world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes and commemorates Yom Haplitim, or Jewish 
        Refugee Day;
            (2) recognizes the hardships of the Jewish people and 
        condemns antisemitism in all its forms;
            (3) calls for educational efforts throughout the United 
        States, the Middle East, and North Africa to teach the history 
        of the forced displacement and exile of the Jewish people; and
            (4) supports efforts in safeguarding the well-being of the 
        Jewish people against present and future threats.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 507.12 General.

The Heraldic Quality Control Program provides a method for ensuring that controlled heraldic items are manufactured by certified manufacturers in accordance with Government specifications. The design of metal insignia will be an exact duplicate of the design of the Government die or loaned hub from which the certified manufacturer's working die is extracted. The design of textile insignia will be embroidered in accordance with Government-furnished specification and cartoon.
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.107 Discharge.

In the context of the review function prescribed by 10 U.S.C. 1553, a discharge or dismissal is a complete separation from the Naval Service, other than one pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial. By reason of usage, the term “discharge” is predominantly applicable to the separation of enlisted personnel for any reason, and the term “dismissal” to the separation of officers as a result of Secretarial or general court-martial action. In the context of the mission of the NDRB, the term “discharge” used here shall, for purpose of ease of expression, include any complete separation from the naval service other than that pursuant to the sentence of general court-martial. The term “discharge” also includes the type of discharge and the reason/basis for that discharge, e.g., Other Than Honorable/Misconduct (Civil Conviction).
Exhibit 10.4  February 3, 2009  Dear Bruce,  On behalf of the Board of Directors of Quixote Corporation, it is with
pleasure that I confirm to you the details of your employment as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Quixote Corporation effective January 1,
2009.  These details as approved by the
Compensation Committee are as follows:  ·Your base pay will be increased to
$285,000 per year payable semi monthly. 
Your base pay will be reviewed by the Compensation Committee at the August 2009
board meeting and adjusted as appropriate.  ·A 20,000 share five-year stock option
will be recommended to the Compensation Committee for its approval at the February 2009
meeting.  You will be eligible for future
stock options and/or stock grants as determined by the Compensation Committee,
typically in the August time frame of each year.  ·A bonus plan will be developed, and
you are guaranteed a minimum $50,000 bonus for FY 2009 to be paid in August of
2009.  ·The relocation package for you and
your family to move from Raleigh, NC to Chicago is intended to cover all
typical costs to you and your family due to the move and will include a housing
differential for up to two years in an amount to be mutually determined once
more data is gathered.  ·Your current car plan will continue,
but we will most likely phase out this perquisite as we did for the other
corporate officers.  ·By February 3, 2009, you will be
provided with a Change of Control Agreement, equivalent to the other corporate
officers agreements.  ·By February 3, 2009 your current
Severance and Non-Competition Agreement with Quixote Transportation
Technologies, Inc. (Inform Segment) will be replaced with our standard
corporate Severance and Non-Competition Agreement.


Bruce, I look forward to working with you in this new challenge in your
career and wish to echo the best wishes from the Board for every success.   Sincerely,/s/ Leslie J. JezuitLeslie J. JezuitLJJ/cmcAccepted:/s/ Bruce ReimerBruce Reimer
#### § 720.11 Interviewing servicemembers or civilian employees by Federal civilian investigative agencies.

Requests by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Naval Investigative Service Command, or other Federal civilian investigative agencies to interview members or civilian employees of the Department of the Navy suspected or accused of crimes should be promptly honored. Any refusal of such a request shall be immediately reported to the Judge Advocate General, or the Office of General Counsel, as appropriate, by telephone, or by message if telephone is impractical. When the employee in question is a member of an exclusive bargaining unit, a staff judge advocate or General Counsel attorney will be consulted to determine whether the employee has a right to have a bargaining unit representative present during the interview.