alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 516.6 Appearance as counsel. ( a ) *General.* Military personnel on active duty and DA civilian personnel will not appear as counsel before any civilian court or in any preliminary proceeding, for example, deposition, in litigation in which the Army has an interest without the prior written approval of TJAG, except under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The appearance is authorized by this regulation.
( 2 ) The individual is a party to the proceeding.
( 3 ) The appearance is authorized under an expanded legal assistance program (See AR 27-3).
( 4 ) The individual is a judge advocate assigned or detailed by TJAG to DOJ to represent the United States in civil or criminal cases, for example, a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, or an attorney assigned to Litigation Division.
( b ) *Procedure.* All requests for appearance as counsel will be made through Litigation Division to the Personnel, Plans and Training Office, OTJAG. Requests for DA military or civilian attorneys to appear in any civilian court or proceeding on behalf of a soldier who is also facing UCMJ action will be delivered to the SJA, legal adviser, or Regional Defense Counsel, as appropriate. The SJA or legal adviser will forward the request to Litigation Division with an evaluation of the case and recommendation. Regional Defense Counsel should send requests for USATDS counsel to Chief, USATDS, who will forward the request to Litigation Division. Privileged or otherwise sensitive client information should only be submitted through USATDS channels.
#### § 770.25 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to promulgate regulations governing entry to naval installations in the State of Hawaii.
#### N.C. DEPT. OF ADMINISTRATION v. SHAW FOOD SERVICES

No. 411PA97

Case below: Court of Appeals, P97-421

Petition by Attorney General for writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 September 1997. Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas allowed 4 September 1997.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 7, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry
D. Frandsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ TERRY D. FRANDSEN
-------------------------------------
Terry D. Frandsen
Chief Financial Officer
October 26, 2006


                                       20
# FORM 6-K

SECURITIES
  AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,
  D.C. 20549

# Report of
  Foreign Issuer

# Pursuant
  to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of

# Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934

For the month
  of October 2004

ABBEY NATIONAL
  PLC 
  (Translation of registrants name into English)

Abbey National
  House, 2 Triton Square, Regent's Place
London NW1 3AN, England   
   (Address of principal executive offices)

|Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
      cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . . Indicate
        by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained
        in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission
        pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Yes
.. . . . . . . No . . .X. . . .


---

**Abbey National plc****11 October 2004**

Issued: 11 October 2004

**Rule 2.10 Announcement — Relevant Securities in Issue**

In accordance with Rule 2.10 of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers, Abbey National plc ("Abbey") confirms that, as at close of business on 7th October 2004, it had in issue 1,482,835,590 *(including those represented by ADSs)* ordinary shares of 10 pence each ("Abbey Shares").

The International Securities Identification Number for the Abbey Shares is GB0000044551 and for the American Depositary Shares of Abbey is US0029201060.

Each American Depositary Share of Abbey represents two Abbey Shares.

Karen Carson 
Secretariat Assistant 
Tel: 0207 756 4358

The directors of Abbey National plc accept responsibility for the information contained in this announcement and confirm that, to the best of their knowledge and belief (having taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case), the information contained in this announcement is in accordance with the facts and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information.

---

# SIGNATURES

Pursuant
  to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
  duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
  duly authorized.

|                           |  | ABBEY NATIONAL PLC                       
|-------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|**Date: 12  October 2004** |  | By: /s/ Karen Carson                     
|                           |  | ****Karen Carson****Abbey Secretariat****
### §1601. Enforcement of order

If any person against whom an order is issued under section 1599 of this title fails to obey the order, the Secretary of Agriculture, or the United States, by its Attorney General, may apply to the court of appeals of the United States, within the circuit where the person against whom the order was issued resides or has his principal place of business, for the enforcement of the order, and shall file the record in such proceedings, as provided in section 2112 of title 28. Upon such filing of the application the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the person against whom the order was issued. The evidence to be considered, the procedure to be followed, and the jurisdiction of the court shall be the same as provided in section 1600 of this title for applications to set aside or modify orders.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title IV, §411, 53 Stat. 1288; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(a), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107; Pub. L. 85–791, §24(c), Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 949; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(7)(B), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3357.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–620 struck out second par. which required proceedings in such cases to be made a preferred cause and expedited in every way.

1958—Pub. L. 85–791 substituted "file the record in such proceedings as provided in section 2112 of title 28" for "certify and file with its application a full and accurate transcript of the record in such proceedings, including the complaint, the evidence, the report, and the order" in first sentence, and struck out "and transcript" after "application" in second sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1949, substituted "court of appeals" for "circuit court of appeals" wherever appearing in this section.

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date

See section 1610 of this title.
| Exhibit      32.1 |
|-------------------|

| (a)   | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 4, 2008,      which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as      amended; and                              |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b)   | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended April 29, 2007, which accompanies this certification, fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operation of Duckwall-ALCO Stores,Inc. |
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.812 Responsibilities of the Reading Room. ( a ) Copies of decisional documents will be provided to individuals or organizations outside the NCR in response to written requests for such documents. Although the Reading Room shall try to make timely responses to such requests, certain factors such as the length of a request, the volume of other pending requests, and the impact of other responsibilities of the staff assigned to such duties may cause some delays. A fee may be charged for such documents under appropriate DOD and Department of the Army directives and regulations. The manual that accompanies the index of decisions shall notify the public that if an applicant indicates that a review is scheduled for a specific date, an effort will be made to provide requested decisional documents before that date. The individual or organization will be advised if that cannot be accomplished.
( b ) Correspondence relating to matters under the cognizance of the Reading Room (including requests for purchase of indexes) shall be addressed to:
DA Military Review Board Agency, Attention: SFBA (Reading Room), Room 1E520, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              10
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         28
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,209
<PP&E>                                           1,529
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              442
<BONDS>                                            969
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        350
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,847
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   359
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  34
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    130
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 80
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        80
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .0
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 2, 2021

b0125

Order 

Clerk

February 2, 2021

161248

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161248

COA: 352341

Macomb CC: 2017-000598-FH

JOHN JOSEPH MURPHY, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

By order of October 30, 2020, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the 

application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals. On order 

of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
### **CHAPTER 12—ASSOCIATIONS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS PRODUCERS**

Sec.
291.
Authorization of associations; powers.
292.
Monopolizing or restraining trade and unduly enhancing prices prohibited; remedy and procedure.
RECEIVED 

EPA REGION Ill 

OCT 0 3 2011 

NPDES ENFORCEMENT BRANC

I certify that Clairton Municipal Authority- Clairton Sewage Treat fii 42) 

which operates under NPDES Permit No. P A0026824 will not accept any oil and gas exploration 

and/or production wastewaters at this facility. For the purpose of this certification, oil and gas 

exploration and/or production wastewaters includes, but is not limited to: ground water produced 

from coal seams, shale formation ground water, well drilling fluids, fracturing fluids, shale gas 

produced water, water produced from conventional and unconventional wells, pit water, 

containment pond water, and storage pond water. 

If Clairton Municipal Authority - Clairton Sewage Treatment Plant desires to 

accept oil and gas exploration and/or production wastewater after signing this certification, 

Clairton Municipal Authority - Clairton Sewage Treatment Plant will, prior to acceptance: 

notify EPA Region III and P ADEP of its intent, take all actions necessary to comply with the 

Clean Water Act (CWA) and receive all necessary approvals from EPA and PADEP. 

As a company official, I certify that this statement is true and correct. I am aware that 

violations of CW A are punishable under the civil and criminal provisions of Section 309 of the 

CW A, which provide for the assessment of penalties, injunctive relief and imprisonment. 

H 

(Title) 

(Date)
### **CHAPTER 84—NATIONAL NUTRITION MONITORING AND RELATED RESEARCH**

Sec.
5301.
Congressional statement of purposes.
5302.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—NUTRITION MONITORING AND RELATED RESEARCH

5311.
Establishment of coordinated program.
5311a.
Joint nutrition monitoring and related research activities.
5312.
Functions of Secretaries.
5313.
Development of comprehensive plan for National Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research Program.
5314.
Implementation of comprehensive plan.
5315.
Scientific research and development in support of coordinated program and comprehensive plan.
5316.
Annual budget submission.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL NUTRITION MONITORING ADVISORY COUNCIL

5331.
Structure of Council.
5332.
Functions of Council.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—DIETARY GUIDANCE

5341.
Establishment of dietary guidelines.
5342.
Nutrition training report.
Motion Granted; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed ; and Memorandum

Opinion filed November 3 , 2011

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 11

- 00 835

- CV

____________

IN RE VANGUARD NATURAL RESOURCES, LLC, ENCORE ENERGY PARTNERS LP, ENCORE ENERGY PARTNERS GP LLC, SCOTT W. SMITH, RICHARD A. ROBERT, DOUGLAS PENCE, W. TIMOTHY HAUSS, DAVID C. BAGGETT, JOHN E. JACKSON, and MARTIN G. WHITE , Relator s

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING W RIT OF M ANDAMUS 125th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 19340



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On September 27 , 2011, relator s , Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC, Encore
Energy Partners LP, Encore Energy Partners GP , S cott W. Smith, Richard A. Robert,
Douglas Pence, W. Timothy Hauss, David C. Baggett, John E. Jackson, and Martin G.

White , filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov ’ t Code § 22.221.

Relator s asked this court to direct the Honorabl e Kyle Carter , presiding Judge of the 125th
District Court of Harris County, to set aside his order signed August 31 , 2011, denying2

relators’ motion to stay the underlying litigation in favor of parallel litigation pending in

Delaware and to grant the stay

.

On October 27, 2011, relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss their petition
for writ of mandamus. In the motion, relators state that the parties have resolv e d the issue
in this original proceeding

, and on October 21, 2011, the trial court signe d an agreed order
staying its proceedings.

We gra nt the motion and order relator s ’ petition for writ of mandamus dismissed.
We further order that all costs are to be borne by the party incurring those costs.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher

.
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a))

I,
Leslie J. Jezuit, certify that:

Date: November 7, 2008

By:

/s/ LESLIE J. JEZUIT Leslie J. Jezuit Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


---



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a))

I,
Daniel P. Gorey, certify that:

Date: November 7, 2008

By:

/s/ DANIEL P. GOREY Daniel P. Gorey Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer


---



QuickLinks
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7577** 

LEE ROY KNOWLIN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; VIRGINIA GOVERNING AGENTS , Respondents

– Appellees , and UNKNOWN, Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00676

- CMH

- TRJ )

Submitted : November 18, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Lee Roy Knowlin , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lee Roy Knowlin seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificat e of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasona ble jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Knowlin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Casimiro Goytia, Respondent. Feinor Novelty Company, Incorporated, Respondent. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.

Motion for permission to withdraw and discontinue appeal. Motion granted. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
Travel Masters email: trvlmasters@usa.net 

737 N. New Ballas ahe Plaza Shops) • St. Louis, Missouri 63141 • 314 / 432-7575 • Fax 314 / 432-4818 

February 24, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support 

of American's application to provide new service from New York's John F. 

Kennedy International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport to 

Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your 

success last December in reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement 

with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service 

trom New York and Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential 

connection between three of the world's largest financial and commerce 

centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' 

oneworld Alliance membership, have underscored American's strong 

commitment to the trans-Pacific market. American is likewise committed 

to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal points of business, trade, 

entertainment, technology and education - providing unsurpassed air 

service since the mid-1900s 
Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant 

economic benefits from these proposed new flights, as will American's 

customers and employees. However, we need your help to make the JFK 

& LAX/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its 

request for slots to fly from Kennedy and Los Angeles to Haneda! 

Sincerely, 

Anita Morcontel 

Travel Counselor
| Subsidiary                    |   | State of Incorporation |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                          |   |                             |
| Xantech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |   | Tennessee                        |
| Pure-ific Corporation         |   | Nevada                           |
| Provectus Biotech, Inc.       |   | Tennessee                        |
| Provectus Devicetech, Inc.    |   | Tennessee                        |
| Provectus Imaging, Inc.       |   | Tennessee                        |
| IP Tech, Inc.                 |   | Tennessee                        |
| Provectus Pharmatech, Inc.    |   | Tennessee                        |

----
### §1431a. Cotton donations to educational institutions

Commodity Credit Corporation is authorized, on such terms as the Secretary of Agriculture may approve, to donate cotton acquired through its price support operations to educational institutions for use in the training of students in the processing and manufacture of cotton into textiles.

(Pub. L. 85–835, title V, §505, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 996.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agricultural Act of 1958, and not as part of the Agricultural Act of 1949 which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of the 1949 Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.