alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 8.1

The following table sets forth a list of our subsidiaries. Omitted from the
table are those subsidiaries which are not significant subsidiaries (as defined
in rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended).

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name Of Subsidiary                        Jurisdiction of Incorporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elbit Systems Ltd.                        Israel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given Imaging Ltd.                        Israel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Galil Medical Ltd.                        Israel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mediagate N.V.                            The Netherlands
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ChipX Incorporated                        Delaware, U.S.A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A.M.T. Advanced Metal Technologies Ltd.   Israel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
#### § 705.1 Purpose.

The regulations and rules in this part prescribe policies and procedures for the Department of the Navy pertaining to public affairs practices.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Quixote Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:



|DATE: February 13, 2004 |  | /s/LESLIE J. JEZUITLeslie J. Jezuit, Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: February 13, 2004 |  | /s/DANIEL P. GOREYDaniel P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer  

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure.

---

QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-091-128   -      -CV

IN RE InN rReE EdDmMoOnNdD HoOyYtT PoOwWeElLlL	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that it does not ahavhave jurisdiction to considere relator’s complaintrelief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL  :   LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOTOT, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  May 278, 2009
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Kehoe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of MS Structured Asset Corp.
on behalf of SATURNS Trust No. 2002-8;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National
Association and its officers and agents.



                                                   By: /s/ John Kehoe
                                                      ----------------------
                                                   Name:  John Kehoe
                                                   Title: Vice President
                                                   Date:  February 27, 2004
EXHIBIT 10.06
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
FORM OF
PERFORMANCE-BASED
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
FOR EMPLOYEES
 Award Date Capstead Company Grantee
 Committee
   GRANT
 Grant and Acceptance Award Shares Common Stock
 Effect of Plan Plan
 RIGHTS IN SHARES
 MEASUREMENT PERIOD AND VESTING




---



##### 



Benchmark Return
 Earnings
 Long-Term Investment Capital
 Portfolio Restructuring Gains or Losses
 Return on Long-Term Investment Capital
 Measurement Period .
 Measurement Period
 Measurement Period
 Final
Measurement Period
 Vesting and Vesting Date .
 Vesting
Date Final Determination




---



##### 



Effect of Grantees Death
 Effect of Dissolution or Liquidation
 Effect of Change of Control
 Effect of Forfeiture




---



##### 



STOCK CERTIFICATES
 TRANSFER OF AWARD SHARES
 Transfer
  WITHHOLDINGS
 ADJUSTMENTS TO AWARD SHARES
 Stock Dividends and Splits and Similar Transactions
 Change in Par Value
 Other Capital Adjustments




---



##### 



GRANTEES REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
     IMPACT ON OTHER BENEFITS
 ADMINISTRATION
 NO AGREEMENT TO CONTINUE IN EMPLOYMENT
 AMENDMENT(S)
 FORCE AND EFFECT
 GOVERNING LAWS
 MISCELLANEOUS




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATIONBy:Phillip A. ReinschExecutive Vice President & Chief Financial
Officer[GRANTEE]
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 3, 2011 

# Order

March 3, 2011

142465 & (49)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 142465

v CoA: 293319 Lapeer CC: 08-009774-FC VICTOR MANUEL ANDRADE, Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ _________________

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipula tion signed by the atto rneys for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leav e to appeal is considered and, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application fo r leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
### **CHAPTER 20—DUMPING OR DESTRUCTION OF INTERSTATE PRODUCE**

Sec.
491.
Destruction or dumping of farm produce received in interstate commerce by commission merchants, etc.; penalty.
492.
Repealed.
493.
Enforcement of provisions; prosecution of cases.
494.
Rules and regulations; cooperation with States, etc., officers and employees; expenditures.
495.
Authorization of appropriations.
496.
Validity of other statutes dealing with same subject.
497.
Separability.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JAN 15, 2010

JOHN LEY

ACTING CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-11177

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 97-00281-CR-2-LSC-TMP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus

TERAINO ADARRY BIVINS, 

a.k.a. Dog, 

a.k.a. Thomas W Moon, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________

(January 15, 2010)

Before EDMONDSON, BLACK and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Joseph A. Ingram, appointed counsel for Teraino Adarry Bivins, in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that

there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to

withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order revoking Bivins’s

supervised release and imposing his 24-month sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e)(3) is AFFIRMED.

2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 2, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-11225 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FRANCISCO JAVIER FUENTES-VILLARREAL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-3-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Francisco Javier Fuentes-Villarreal was convicted of one charge of illegal reentry into the United States. The district court sentenced him to 88 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. Fuentes-Villarreal argues on appeal that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment based on an alleged violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial.No. 03-11225 -2- Fuentes-Villarreal has not shown that the district court erred in denying his motion. Fuentes-Villarreal has not shown that he is entitled to a presumption of prejudice in connection with the delay between his indictment and prosecution, nor has he shown actual prejudice arising from this delay. See United States v. Serna-Villarreal , 352 F.3d 225, 230 (5th Cir. 2003), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 1896 (2004). Accordingly, the district court’s denial of Fuentes-Villarreal’s motion to dismiss is
AFFIRMED.
### **CHAPTER 88—RESEARCH**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION

Sec.
5801.
Purpose and definitions.

#### Part A—Best Utilization of Biological Applications

5811.
Research and extension projects.
5812.
Program administration.
5813.
Federal-State matching grant program.
5814.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### Part B—Integrated Management Systems

5821.
Integrated management systems.
5822.
Repealed.

#### Part C—Sustainable Agriculture Technology Development and Transfer Program

5831.
Technical guides and handbooks.
5832.
National Training Program.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL GENETIC RESOURCES PROGRAM

5841.
Establishment, purpose, and functions of National Genetic Resources Program.
5842.
Appointment and authority of Director.
5843.
Advisory council.
5844.
Definitions and authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM

5851.
Short title and purposes.
5852.
Agricultural Weather Office.
5853.
Repealed.
5854.
State agricultural weather information systems.
5855.
Funding.
5856.
Improvements to United States Drought Monitor.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—RESEARCH REGARDING PRODUCTION, PREPARATION, PROCESSING, HANDLING, AND STORAGE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS

5871 to 5874. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—PLANT AND ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM

5881 to 5885. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND COMMERCIALIZATION

5901 to 5909. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER VII—MISCELLANEOUS RESEARCH PROVISIONS

5921.
Biotechnology risk assessment research.
5921a to 5923. Repealed.
5924.
Agricultural Genome to Phenome Initiative.
5925.
High-priority research and extension initiatives.
5925a.
Repealed.
5925b.
Organic agriculture research and extension initiative.
5925c.
Organic production and market data initiatives.
5925d.
International organic research collaboration.
5925e.
Repealed.
5925f.
Farm business management.
5925g.
Urban, indoor, and other emerging agricultural production research, education, and extension initiative.
5926.
Centers of excellence.
5927 to 5929. Repealed.
5930.
Reservation extension agents.
5931, 5932. Repealed.
5933.
Assistive technology program for farmers with disabilities.
5934, 5935. Repealed.
5936.
Farm and Ranch Stress Assistance Network.
5936a.
Support for farm stress programs.
5937.
Natural products research program.
5938.
Repealed.
5939.
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research.
5940.
Legitimacy of industrial hemp research.
5941.
Purchase of cultures for soil and fertilizer investigations.
5942.
Wheat and feed grains research; regional and national research programs; utilization of services of Federal, State and private agencies; authorization of appropriations.
5943.
Rice research.
Extension of Employment Agreemnt of J Michael Hightower dated 9/27/2003



 Exhibit 10.33 
 September 29, 2003 
 Mr. James Hightower 
 Vivendi Universal Entertainment LLLP 
 1000 Universal Studios Plaza 
 Orlando, Florida 32819 
 Dear Mr. Hightower: 
 Reference is made to the employment agreement between you and Universal Studios, Inc. (“Universal”), as assumed by Vivendi Universal Entertainment LLLP (“VUE” or the “Company”) dated April 25, 2002 (the
“Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which you have been employed in an executive capacity. The Company hereby exercises its option to extend the term of the Employment Agreement for two (2) years, commencing July 1, 2004 and
continuing through and including June 30, 2006. All references to either the Company or Universal in the Employment Agreement shall hereinafter refer to VUE. 
 Please acknowledge receipt of this notice by signing the attached copy and returning it to VUE. The original is for your records. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	VIVENDI UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT LLLP
		
	By	 	 /s/ Crystal E. Wright



  

	
	RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGED:
	
	 /s/ James Hightower

	JAMES HIGHTOWER
	
	  

	Date
EXHIBIT 32.3



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Duquesne Light Company (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Morgan K. OBrien, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (5) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 9thday of August, 2005.



/s/ Morgan K. OBrienMorgan K. OBrienPresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Duquesne Light Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2004, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John W. Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board and Director, certify (i) that
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ John W. Somerhalder II
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John W. Somerhalder II
                                           Chairman of the Board and Director
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                           August 13, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural
Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 15.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111310 and 333-152335) pertaining to the Employees' Stock Option Plans of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. of our report dated March 9, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Netvision Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.







/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererKost Forer Gabbay & KasiererA member of Ernst & Young Global




Haifa, Israel


March 28, 2010
#### George J. Gross et al., Respondents, v. Wayne Chappelle et al., Appellants.

In a vendees’ action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 2, 1963, which denied their motion for summary judgment and for cancellation of a *lis pendens*filed against the property. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted; complaint dismissed and *lis pendens*directed to be cancelled of record. The Statute of Frauds (Real Property Law, § 259) was pleaded as a defense. The papers submitted establish that neither the contract of sale nor any note or memorandum was subscribed by the defendant vendors or by their lawful agent thereunto authorized by any writing. The complaint therefore must be dismissed *(Mondrus*v. *Salt Haven Corp.,*270 App. Div. 1030, mot. for lv. to app. den. 270 App. Div. 1046; *Singer*v. *Klebanow,*9 Misc 2d 1016). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur; Rabin, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order for the reasons stated by the Justice at Special Term.
#### GIBBS v. LACKAWANNA LEATHER CO.

No. 531P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 555

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
American Vantage Companies

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statement No 333-00905
on Form S-8 of American Vantage Companies of our report dated October 12, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of American Vantage Companies as of
July 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which
report appears in the July 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-KSB of American
Vantage Companies.



/s/ Bradshaw, Smith & Co., LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
October 26, 2000
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1088 

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION and WHIRLPOOL PATENTS COMPANY, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

ON MOTION 

Before NEWMAN, RADER, and LINN, Circuit Judges. 

RADER, Circuit Judge. 

O R D E R

 LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. (LG) move to dismiss the 

appeal filed by Whirlpool Corporation and Whirlpool Patents Company (Whirlpool). LG 

states that General Electric Company joins the motion. Whirlpool opposes. LG replies. 

The parties also submit letters in support of their positions. 

 Whirlpool sued LG and General Electric for infringement of two patents. LG and 

General Electric filed counterclaims seeking declaratory judgments of noninfringement 

of both patents, declaratory judgments of invalidity of both patents on various grounds, 

and a declaratory judgment of unenforceability of one of the patents. The parties filed 

various motions for summary judgment, but LG and General Electric did not file motions 

for summary judgment concerning all issues underlying the declaratory judgment 
counterclaims. The district court granted summary judgment of noninfringement of the 

first patent and invalidity of the second patent. The district court denied the other 

summary judgment motions as moot and entered a “judgment.” Whirlpool filed an 

appeal. 

 Whirlpool argues that it can appeal, despite the lack of entry of a judgment 

dismissing or denying the defendants’ counterclaims, because the district court’s intent 

to deny those counterclaims is clear from the circumstances. We disagree. As LG 

notes, the defendants’ motions for summary judgment did not raise all of the issues that 

are raised by the counterclaims. Thus, by denying summary judgment only on the 

issues raised by motions for summary judgment, the district court did not clearly decide 

all of the relief sought by the counterclaimants. 

 Because not all claims for relief were disposed of, and no judgment was entered 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), there is no final judgment and the appeal must be 

dismissed as premature. Nystrom v. Trex Co., Inc., 339 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2003); 

International Elec. Tech. Corp. v. Hughes Aircraft Co., --- F.3d ---, 2007 WL 189341 

(Fed. Cir. Jan. 26, 2007). 

 Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 (1) The motion to dismiss is granted. 

 (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

 FOR THE COURT 

_____March 1, 2007_________ /s/ Randall R. Rader_______ 

 Date Randall R. Rader 

 Circuit Judge 

2007-1088 - 2 - 
cc: David A. Boehnen, Esq. 

 Larry S. Nixon, Esq. 

 Richard L. Stroup, Esq. 

s8 

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: ______________________ 

2007-1088 - 3 -