alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,917
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                       516
<INVENTORY>                                     21,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,699
<PP&E>                                         176,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,681
<BONDS>                                         39,000
<COMMON>                                         8,805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,143
<SALES>                                        115,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,172
<CGS>                                           89,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,616
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,539
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,077
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,077
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                       968
<INVENTORY>                                     23,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,597
<PP&E>                                         225,314
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 252,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,586
<BONDS>                                         44,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,988
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   252,610
<SALES>                                         95,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,789
<CGS>                                           69,742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,109
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,009
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50


</TABLE>
Exhibit No. 8
Form 10KSB
SPM Group, Inc.

                          FIRST AMENDMENT
                              TO THE
                              BY-LAWS
                                OF
                         S P M GROUP, INC.

                            ARTICLE II

                      Shareholder's Meetings

     1. Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of shareholders will be
held  in  each year on the FIRST WEDNESDAY OF MAY. If the  day  so
fixed  for  such  annual  meeting be a legal  holiday,  then  such
meeting will be held on the next succeeding business day.

                            ARTICLE III

                        Board of Directors

      2.    Organization Meetings. After each annual  election  of
directors,  the  Board of Directors will meet for the  purpose  of
organization, the election of officers, and the transaction of any
other  business. SUCH MEETING SHALL BE HELD WITHOUT NOTICE AT  THE
PLACE  OF  THE  ANNUAL  MEETING  OF THE  SHAREHOLDERS  IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING THE SHAREHOLDERS' MEETING.

     10.  NOMINATING COMMITTEE. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY APPOINT
A  NOMINATING  COMMITTEE IN ADVANCE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING  OF  THE
SHAREHOLDERS,  WHICH COMMITTEE WILL REPORT TO SUCH ANNUAL  MEETING
OF  THE  SHAREHOLDERS.  THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE'S  REPORT  IS  TO
INCLUDE  A RECOMMENDATION OF THE NUMBER OF DIRECTORS TO BE ELECTED
AT  THAT MEETING AND A SLATE OF CANDIDATES FOR SUCH POSITIONS. THE
RECOMMENDATION OF SUCH COMMITTEE REGARDING THE NUMBER OF DIRECTORS
TO BE ELECTED WILL BE DEEMED ADOPTED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS UNLESS  A
MOTION TO THE CONTRARY BE DULY MADE, SECONDED, AND ADOPTED BY  THE
SHAREHOLDERS. THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE WILL BE DEEMED TO  BE  A
PROPER PLACING IN NOMINATION OF EACH PERSON NAMED IN THE SLATE  OF
CANDIDATES PROPOSED; AND NO FURTHER ACTION TO NOMINATE ANY  PERSON
NAMED IN THAT SLATE WILL BE NECESSARY.

                            CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected,
qualified,  acting,  and  hereunto  authorized  Secretary  of  the
aforesaid Corporation and that the foregoing and annexed first
                               E-24
<PAGE>

amendment to the By-laws constitutes a true and complete  copy  of
the  said amendments of the By-laws of said Corporation as adopted
by Consent on 30 May 1979 and presently in full force and effect.

      Except as specifically amended by the foregoing, the By-laws
adopted by resolution on 24 April 1978 are presently in full force
and effect.

       IN   WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has  signed  this
Certificate and affixed hereto the seal of the said Corporation.

     Date:     30 May 1979

                                   /s/ Peter A. Pfister, Secretary

S E A L

                               E-25
<PAGE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

NANCY SPURLOCK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee

No. 2D23-220

March 27, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Frederick P. 

Mercurio, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Simone Lennon, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs 

Cline, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

BLACK, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
### §2009cc–13. Additional penalties for noncompliance

#### (a) In general

With respect to any rural business investment company that violates or fails to comply with this subchapter (including any rule, regulation, order, or participation agreement under this subchapter), the Secretary may, in accordance with this section—

(1) void the participation agreement between the Secretary and the rural business investment company; and

(2) cause the rural business investment company to forfeit all of the rights and privileges derived by the rural business investment company under this subchapter.

#### (b) Adjudication of noncompliance

#### (1) In general

Before the Secretary may cause a rural business investment company to forfeit rights or privileges under subsection (a), a court of the United States of competent jurisdiction must find that the rural business investment company committed a violation, or failed to comply, in a cause of action brought for that purpose in the district, territory, or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, in which the principal office of the rural business investment company is located.

#### (2) Parties authorized to file causes of action

Each cause of action brought by the United States under this subsection shall be brought by the Secretary or by the Attorney General.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §384N, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6029, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 400.)
§ 631.2 Applicability. This part applies to the following: ( a ) Active U.S. Armed Forces personnel of the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps, and the Coast Guard wherever they are stationed.
( b ) U.S. Armed Forces Reserve personnel only when they are performing Federal duties or engaging in activities directly related to performing a Federal duty or function.
( c ) National Guard personnel only when called or ordered to active duty in a Federal status within the meaning of Title 10, United States Code.
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.14 Filing a claim.

Claimant complains (orally or in writing) to the commander of a military organization or unit of the alleged offending member or members or to the commander of the nearest military installation. If the claim is made orally, the individual must assist the commander to reduce the complaint to writing within a reasonable time. The complainant need not request a sum certain in writing at the time the complaint is filed, but they must present such value and evidence before settlement is made.

[81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00229-CV

In re Jacqueline Morales

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied, and the emergency motion to stay is 

dismissed as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Filed: April 12, 2024
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50821 Conference Calendar

DON RAY WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ROBERT O’CONNOR, U.S. Magistrate, United States Magistrate Judge, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-96-CA-821

- - - - - - - - - - February 21, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Don Ray White, Texas prisoner # 512713, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action. White argues that Magistrate Judge O’Connor and Judge Prado are liable for damages under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 because they improperly conspired to deny White’s second federal habeas petition. White’s claim calls into question the validity of his conviction and sentence and may not be considered in a § 1983 action under Heck v. Humphrey , 114No. 96-50821 - 2 - S. Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994) because White has not demonstrated that his conviction and sentence have been invalidated. Even though this complaint is subject to dismissal under Heck , “it remains appropriate for district courts to consider the possible applicability of the doctrine of absolute immunity.” Boyd v. Biggers , 31 F.3d 279, 284 (5th Cir. 1994). Defendants, Magistrate Judge O’Connor and Judge Prado, are entitled to absolute immunity from suit for damages in § 1983 actions arising out of acts performed in the exercise of their judicial functions. Graves v. Hampton , 1 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993). White’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We previously warned White that frivolous appeals could result in sanctions against him. See White v. Scott , No. 96-40394 (5th Cir. Aug. 1, 1996). Accordingly, White is BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal in this court without the prior written approval of a judge of this court in active service. Further, he is BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court’s jurisdiction, without advance written permission of a judge of the forum court. The clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts subject to the jurisdiction of this court are directed to return to White, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 541 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 541

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
provide for a macadamia tree health initiative, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2017

Ms. Hirono (for herself and Mr. Schatz) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
provide for a macadamia tree health initiative, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Macadamia Tree Health Initiative Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. MACADAMIA TREE HEALTH INITIATIVE.

    Section 1672(d) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade 
Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(d)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(11) Macadamia tree health initiative.--Research and 
        extension grants may be made under this section for the 
        purposes of--
                    ``(A) developing and disseminating science-based 
                tools and treatments to combat the macadamia felted 
                coccid (Eriococcus ironsidei); and
                    ``(B) establishing an areawide integrated pest 
                management program in areas affected by, or areas at 
                risk of being affected by, the macadamia felted coccid 
                (Eriococcus ironsidei).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 723.8 Staff action. ( a ) *Transmittal of final decisions granting relief.* ( 1 ) If the final decision of the Secretary is to grant the applicant's request for relief the record of proceedings shall be returned to the Board for disposition. The Board shall transmit the finalized record of proceedings to proper naval authority for appropriate action. Similarly final decisions of the Board granting the applicant's request for relief under the authority delegated in § 723.6(e), shall also be forwarded to the proper naval authority for appropriate action.
( 2 ) The Board shall transmit a copy of the record of proceedings to the proper naval authority for filing in the applicant's service record except where the effect of such action would be to nullify the relief granted. In such cases no reference to the Board's decision shall be made in the service record or files of the applicant and all copies of the record of proceedings and any related papers shall be forwarded to the Board and retained in a file maintained for this purpose.
( 3 ) The addressees of such decisions shall report compliance therewith to the Executive Director.
( 4 ) Upon receipt of the record of proceedings after final action by the Secretary, or by the Board acting under the authority contained in § 723.6(e), the Board shall communicate the decision to the applicant. The applicant is entitled, upon request, to receive a copy of the Board's findings, conclusions and recommendations.
( b ) *Transmittal of final decisions denying relief.* If the final decision of the Secretary or the Board is to deny relief, the following materials will be made available to the applicant: ( 1 ) A statement of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations made by the Board and the reasons therefor;
( 2 ) Any advisory opinions considered by the Board;
( 3 ) Any minority reports; and
( 4 ) Any material prepared by the Secretary as required in § 723.7. Moreover, applicant shall also be informed that the name and final vote of each Board member will be furnished or made available upon request and that he/she may submit new and material evidence or other matter for further consideration.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
                     STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Statement of Financial  Condition at August 31, 1996  (Unaudited) and
the  Statement  of  Operations  for  the  nine  months  ended  August  31,  1996
(Unaudited)  and is qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000808851                        
<NAME> Structured Asset Securities Corporation      
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         87,971
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,563,765
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            84,186,780
<PP&E>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 90,660,477
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<PAYABLES>                                     3,365,457
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             0
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     87,294,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   90,660,477
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               5,387,866
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            7,691,766
<COMMISSIONS>                                  0
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<COMPENSATION>                                 16,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,782,520
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     5,277,669
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,277,669
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### J. H. MOHLMAN CO., Respondent, v. LANDWEHR, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by the J. H. Mohlman Company against George Landwehr.

No opinion. Motion denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.129 Liability for repayment.

The claimant is liable for repayment. Deduct the advance payment from any award or judgment given to a claimant. Reimbursement from the claimant will be sought if the claimant does not file a claim or lawsuit.

[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83701, Nov. 22, 2016]
§ 2700.12 Criteria for and level of original classification. ( a ) *General Policy.* Documents or other material are to be classified only when protecting the national security requires that the information they contain be withheld from public disclosure. Information may not be classified to conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error, or to prevent embarrassment to a person, organization or agency, or to restrain competition. No material may be classified to limit dissemination, or to prevent or delay public release, unless its classification is consistent with E.O. 12065.
( b ) *Criteria.* To be eligible for classification, information must meet two requirements: ( 1 ) First, it must deal with one of the criteria set forth in section 1-301 of E.O. 12065;
( 2 ) Second, the President's Personal Representative for Micronesian Status Negotiations or his delegate who has original classification authority must determine that unauthorized disclosure of the information or material can reasonably be expected to cause at least identifiable harm to the national security.
( c ) *Classification designations.* Only three designations of classification are authorized—“Top Secret,” “Secret,” “Confidential.” No other classification designation is authorized or shall have force.
( d ) Unnecessary classification, and classification at a level higher than is necessary, shall be avoided. If there is reasonable doubt as to which designation in section 1-1 of E.O. 12065 is appropriate, or whether information should be classified at all, the less restrictive designation should be used, or the information should not be classified.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 1982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Council of 
Councils, January 29, 2021, 10:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m., a virtual 
meeting, which was published in the Federal Register on November 25, 
2020, 85 FR 75342.
    The meeting notice is amended to change the open session meeting 
end time as follows: The open session will now be held from 11:00 a.m. 
to 3:50 p.m.

    Dated: January 5, 2021.
Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00221 Filed 1-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P