alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          27,634
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,246
<INVENTORY>                                     25,885
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,741
<PP&E>                                          51,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,968
<BONDS>                                          9,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           534
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,848
<SALES>                                        141,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,844
<CGS>                                          109,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,740
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,240
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,240
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14


</TABLE>
§ 537.19 Demands arising from maritime claims. ( a ) It is essential that Army claims personnel demand payment, or notify the party involved of the Army's intention to make such demands, as soon as possible following receipt of information of damage to Army property where the party's legal liability to respond exists or might exist. Except as provided below pertaining to admiralty claims and claims for damage to civil works in favor of the United States pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408, copies of the initial demand or written notice of intention to issue a demand letter, as well as copies of subsequent correspondence, will be provided promptly to the Commander USARCS, who will monitor the progress of such claims.
( b ) Subject to limitation of settlement authority, demands for admiralty claims and civil works damages in favor of the United States pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 may be asserted, regardless of amount, by the Chief Counsel COE, or his designees in COE Division or District Counsel offices.
( c ) Where, in response to any demand, a respondent denies liability, fails to respond within a reasonable period, or offers a compromise settlement, the file will be promptly forwarded to the Commander USARCS, except in those cases in which a proposed compromise settlement is deemed acceptable and the claim is otherwise within the authority delegated in § 537.18 of this part. Files for admiralty claims and civil works claims in favor of the United States pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 will be promptly forwarded to the United States Department of Justice.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Structure of the Machine-Tool Accessories Industry, January 1945

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wage Structure of the Machine-Tool Accessories Industry, January 1945 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 868*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1946,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4329,			accessed on September 7, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
SouthwestAirlines Co. Alan Kasher Vice President Flight Operations DirectorofOperations 2702 Love Field Dr. ITOP-BFO P.O. Box 36611 Dallas, Texas 75235 (469) 603-0948
February 24, 2016 Filed Electronicallyto the Federal Register Federal Aviation Administration Regulatory Dockets Orville Wright Building (FOB-10A) 

### BOO IndependenceAvenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Subject: Time-limited Exemption from 14 CFR 91.227 (c)(1)(i) and (iii) -Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) Out Equipment Performance Requirements Reference: Grant of Exemption Number 12555, regulatory docket No. FAA-2015-0971 Grant of Exemption No. 12555 providesfor atime-limited grant ofexemption from the ADS-B Navigation Integrity Category (NIC) and Navigation Accuracy Categoryfor position (NACp) requirements of 14 CFR section 91.227(c)(1)(i) and (iii) from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2024. SouthwestAirlines (SWA) SWAA 304, P.O. Box 36111, Dallas, Texas 75235, herby notifiesthe FAAthat SWA intendsto complywith the conditions and limitations expressed in the exemption cited above. Sincerely,

AK!js

cc: L. Paul Kriner Ill, FAA, Frontline Manager James Hardgrove, FAA, Assistant Principal Operations Inspector Craig Drew, SeniorVice PresidentAir Operations Jeff Hamlett, Senior Director Regulatory Programs & Compliance Bob Waltz, Director Compliance and Operations Jim Stieve, Senior Manager Regulatory Programs & Compliance Barry Brown, Associate General Counsel -Operations and Environment AFS-1 SWACMO
exv10wxssy



 







Exhibit 10(ss)




ENESCO GROUP, INC.

Itasca, Illinois




1996 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

(As amended May 19, 2004)




CERTIFICATE OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK




	 	 	 
	 

	 	Date of Grant: «Date»
	 

	 	Total Number of Shares:  «# of shares»






To:  «First
Name» «Last Name»




Dear «First Name»:




     This letter is a certificate formally granting you Restricted Stock with respect to the
number of shares indicated above upon your appointment as «title» of Enesco Group, Inc. Thirty-three
and 1/3 percent (33 1/3%) of the total number of shares will become vested on each of the first
three (3) anniversary dates of the grant, subject to Section 9 of the Plan.



     The Company shall have the right to require you to pay the Company the amount of any taxes
which the Company is or will be required to withhold, as and when required by law, with respect
to the receipt or vesting of the Restricted Stock before the certificate for such Restricted
Stock is delivered to you. Furthermore, the Company may elect to deduct such taxes from any
amounts then payable in cash or shares or from any amounts payable anytime thereafter to you.
Please consult with your own tax advisor or accountant as to the specific tax consequences to
you as a result of the award.



     If you leave your employment with Enesco Group, Inc. for any reason prior to all of the
Restricted Stock vesting, then you will forfeit any shares that have not vested. You will be
able to vote all «# of shares» shares as a stockholder and receive any distributions with respect to the
shares (i.e. dividends, if declared); however, the Law Department will hold the actual stock
certificate until such time as all «# of shares» shares have vested (or whatever portion if your employment
at Enesco ends prior to that time).



     All shares granted to employees under the 1996 Plan are subject to the termination
provisions of Section 9 of the 1996 Plan. Please review these provisions carefully in
connection with your termination of employment.



     Until the shares have vested, they are not transferable by you, except in the event of
your death and then only as described in the Plan. Any attempted transfer or other disposition
of the shares by you will be void and will constitute valid grounds for its cancellation by the
Company.



 









 





     A copy of the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, is enclosed together with a
Prospectus dated May 19, 2004. Please read these carefully. This Restricted Stock award is
made subject to the provisions of the Plan, as it may be amended from time to time.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ENESCO GROUP, INC.




«Name Secretary»

Secretary

 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 



Enclosures
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Robert T. DeVincenzi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:




(i)         
the Quarterly Report of LaserCard Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and




(ii)        the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of LaserCard
Corporation.


Date:
        August 11, 2009/s/Robert
      T. DeVincenziRobert
      T. DeVincenziChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Exhibit No. 9
Form 10KSB
SPM Group, Inc.

                         SECOND AMENDMENT
                              TO THE
                              BY-LAWS
                                OF
                          SPM GROUP, INC.

                            ARTICLE III
                        Board of Directors

      1.    Number, Election, and Tenure. The business and affairs
of  the Corporation will be managed by a Board of Directors  which
must consist of not more than nine (9) natural persons who will be
elected  at the annual meetings of shareholders by majority  vote,
and  each  director  will  be elected  to  serve  until  the  next
succeeding  annual meeting and until his successor be elected  and
qualify.

                            CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected,
qualified, acting, and hereunto authorized Assistant Secretary  of
the  aforesaid  Corporation  and that the  foregoing  and  annexed
second  amendment to the By-laws constitutes a true  and  complete
copy  of the said amendment of the By-laws of said Corporation  as
adopted  by Resolution of the Corporate Board on October 29,  1981
and presently in full force and effect.

     The By-laws adopted by Resolution on April 24, 1978 and First
Amendment  to the By-laws adopted by Consent on May 30,  1979  are
presently in full force and effect.

       IN   WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has  signed  this
Certificate and affixed hereto the seal of said Corporation.

Dated: October 29, 1981
                                /s/   Nell  R.  Winter,  Assistant
Secretary

S E A L

                               E-26
<PAGE>
#### THOMAS v. UNITED STATES.

No. 11912.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Feb. 15, 1954.

Decided March 4, 1954.

Writ of Certiorari Denied May 17, 1954.

See 74 S.Ct. 780.

Mr. John J. Dwyer, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Paul F. Leonard, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Harold H. Titus, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. *46C., at time record was filed, entered an appearance for appellee.

Before CLARK, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted on two counts of violating Title 18 U.S.C. § 495,1 the first charging that he “falsely forged” an endorsement on a check drawn upon the Treasurer of the United States, and the second that he fraudulently “uttered and published as true and genuine” the forged check. After a trial by a jury, he was found not guilty on the first count and guilty on the second. He brings this appeal urging that the court committed prejudicial error in failing to direct a verdict of acquittal on the first count.

 Upon a motion for judgment of acquittal, the trial judge must assume the truth of the Government’s evidence and give the Government the benefit of all legitimate inferences to be drawn therefrom. When the evidence considered in this light, without conjecture, will “permit the conclusion of guilt beyond reasonable doubt within the fair operation of a reasonable mind”, Curley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389, 392, 160 F.2d 229, 232, certiorari denied, 331 U.S. 837, 67 S.Ct. 1511, 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947), the motion, may properly be denied. Under this test, we cannot say that the evidence here with respect to the first count required the trial judge to direct acquittal.

In any event, appellant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to the fraudulent utterance of the forged check, and his conviction on this second count was clearly warranted.2 On this record, it does not appear that his conviction on the. second count was due to the trial judge’s refusal to direct a verdict on the first count. The unchallenged charge to the jury adequately distinguished the two offenses alleged, and the jury’s verdict of acquittal on the first count, undoubtedly giving effect to appellant’s arguments with reference thereto, demonstrates that the differences were understood. 'These circumstances make it plain that appellant was not prejudiced by submission of both counts to the jury. Cf. Dunaway v. United States, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 299, 205 F.2d 23 (1953).

The judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.

1

. 62 Stat. 711 (1948).

2

. See Pina v. United States, 165 F.2d 890 (C.A.9, 1948).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000             FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999             FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         236,300                 210,931
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,672,800               2,032,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                   205,300                 189,556
<INVENTORY>                                  9,108,000               9,546,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,156,100              11,997,130
<PP&E>                                       1,406,400               1,375,672
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,251,100               1,033,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,311,400              12,339,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,009,400               2,243,916
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,085,800               1,085,848
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,168,800               8,953,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,311,400              12,339,594
<SALES>                                     13,337,400              16,671,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,337,400              16,671,385
<CGS>                                        5,515,000               6,724,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,442,300              13,033,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,164,500               1,553,635
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                34,000                  66,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,900                  96,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,658,700               1,921,393
<INCOME-TAX>                                   635,000                 623,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,023,700               1,297,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,023,700               1,297,493
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .23                     .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23                     .26


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1







                         Consent of Independent Auditors







The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Unique Mobility, Inc.:

Our  report  dated May 8,  2000,  states  that we did not  audit  the  financial
statements of Taiwan UQM Electric Co., Ltd. (a 38.25% owned  investee  company).
The  financial  statements of Taiwan UQM Electric Co, Ltd. were audited by other
auditors whose report has been  furnished to us, and our opinion,  insofar as it
relates to the amounts included for Taiwan UQM Electric,  Co., Ltd. for the year
ended  March  31,  1999 and 1998 is based  solely  on the  report  of the  other
auditors.

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements on
Form S-8 (Nos.  33-23113,  33-24071,  33-34612,  33-35055,  33-34613,  33-41325,
33-64852, 33-47454, 33-81430 and 33-92288) and in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 33-6116, 33-63399, 333-01919,  333-13883,  333-44597,  333-23843,
33-50393,  333-52861,  333-67313 and 333-78525) of Unique Mobility,  Inc. of our
report dated May 8, 2000 relating to the  consolidated  balance sheets of Unique
Mobility,  Inc. and  subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity and comprehensive
income  (loss),  and cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period
ended March 31, 2000,  which report  appears in the March 31, 2000 Annual Report
on Form-K of Unique Mobility, Inc.


                                         /s/KPMG LLP
                                            KPMG LLP
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

 

We hereby consent  to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Elron Electronic  Industries Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-10570 and File No. 333-111310) of  our report dated February 9, 2003, on our audit of the consolidated financial  statements of Chip Express (Israel) Ltd. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and  for the years then ended, which is included in the Elron Electronic Industries  Ltd. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 as amended.

 

|   |   |   |                                                        |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ Kost Forer & Gabbay                                 |
|   |   |   | Kost Forer & GabbayA member of Ernst & Young Global |

 

Haifa,March 3, 2004
#### § 750.55 Attorney's fees.

Attorney's fees not in excess of 20 percent of any settlement may be allowed. Attorney's fees so determined are to be paid out of the amount awarded and not in addition to the award. These fee limitations shall be incorporated in any settlement agreement secured from a claimant.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 98]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29033]



[[Page 98]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than February 3, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Kathryn Haney, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8acbfafae6e3e9ebfee3e5e4f9a4c9e5e7e7efe4fef9caebfee6a4ecf8e8a4e5f8ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d091a0a0bcb9b3b1a4b9bfbea3fe93bfbdbdb5bea4a390b1a4bcfeb6a2b2febfa2b7">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. St. Holdings, Inc., Orlando, Florida; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring outstanding shares of Rochelle State Bank, 
Rochelle, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 28, 
2020.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2020-29033 Filed 12-31-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 552.19 Hunting and fishing permits.

All permits to hunt, catch, trap, or kill any kind of game animal, game or nongame bird, or to fish on a military reservation or the waters thereof will be issued by the commanding officer.

[13 FR 6058, Oct. 15, 1948]
#### In re CRAMER. In the matter of the application of Charles Cramer, for admission to the bar.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 25, 1903.)

No opinion. Application granted.