alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §321k. Model standards and guidelines for critical infrastructure workers

#### (a) In general

Not later than 12 months after August 3, 2007, and in coordination with appropriate national professional organizations, Federal, State, local, and tribal government agencies, and private-sector and nongovernmental entities, the Administrator shall establish model standards and guidelines for credentialing critical infrastructure workers that may be used by a State to credential critical infrastructure workers that may respond to a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster.

#### (b) Distribution and assistance

The Administrator shall provide the standards developed under subsection (a), including detailed written guidance, to State, local, and tribal governments, and provide expertise and technical assistance to aid such governments with credentialing critical infrastructure workers that may respond to a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other manmade disaster.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title V, §522, as added Pub. L. 110–53, title IV, §409(a), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 305.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000315958
<NAME>                        NEW GENERATION FOODS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1
<CASH>                                          1,400
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,400
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,346
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           1,100
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        4
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,050)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,400
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                162
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (81)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (81)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.3



SOCIAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT

---

BULLETIN N°53 / 2005

---

DATE: 02/ 24/ 2005



Pemex awards the contract for the Pirineo block at the Burgos Basin

Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) awarded today the third Multiple Service Contract (MSC) of the second round to a Latin American consortium integrated by Mexican, Colombian and Venezuelan companies, for the development, infrastructure and non-associated gas fields maintenance works to be performed in the Pirineo block at the Burgos Basin.

Once the technical proposal submitted by the consortium resulted feasible, the economical proposal was opened. The bidding was for the amount of U.S. $645.3 million.

The winning consortium is integrated by four Mexican companies: Constructora Industrial Monclova, Materiales la Gloria, Alianz Petroleum and Steel Serv.; two companies from Venezuela, Suelopetrol and NCT, Estudios y Proyectos, and by the Colombian company, Petrotesting Colombia.

In this second round, PEMEX focused in increasing participation from the domestic industry. This result confirms that Mexican companies definitely occupy an important place in the development of non-associated natural gas in our country.

With the eight contracts that have been awarded to date, the country will be able to raise new investments that amount to U.S. $6,343 million; increase the production of

---

domestic natural gas by an additional 655 million cubic feet per day, with the consequent decrease in imports, and it will also be able to attract new technologies that will increase Pemexs execution capacities.

By awarding the Multiple Service Contracts, Petróleos Mexicanos will strengthen its execution capacities for the development of the Proyecto Integral Cuenca de Burgos (Burgos Basin Integral Project), which is designed to increase the non-associated natural gas production, reduce imports and help meet the growing demand for this energy in Mexico.

The contract award ceremony was transmitted todays afternoon in real time by Internet at www.csm.pemex.com.



---
#### STATE v. JONES

No. 395A91-3

Case below: 343 N.C. 755

Motion by defendant to reconsider the denial of first post-conviction petition for certiorari/supersedeas on 7/30/96 dismissed 2 October 1997.
EXHIBIT 32.A



















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James J. Cleary, President, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
















/s/ James J. ClearyJames J. ClearyPresident(Principal Executive Officer)El Paso Natural Gas CompanyMay 7, 2010


































A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00139-CR

Ulyess Hughes

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 21435

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 10, 2021
Faulk, Scott (OST>

. \ < '-
. n ; 1

, . , ' , .• ;'

. s " Faulk , Scott (OST)

- ' ". W~dnesday, February 19 , 2014 11:33 AM Alask,!'I DOT, Linda Bustamante (Linda
. bustamante@alaska
. gov); rich.seweil@alaska
. gov ; ' ~ - S tJ v ~ : hatter@alaska
. gov'; 'Cronkhite, Rebecca J (DOT), EAS at Chisana and Healy Lake 40-Mile Air.pdf From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Greetings All: I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Chisana and Healy Lake , Al a ska and gi v e y ou an opportunity to submit any comments if y ou w ish. As y ou m ay kno w, the Dep artment o f Transportation issued Order 2014-1-12 , on January 16 , 2014 , to solicit proposals from all interested air carrier s to provide EAS at Chisana and Healy Lake for a new contract , beginning June 1 , 2014. Those proposals w ere due no later than February 18 , 2014. At this stage , w e w ould normally ask for y our preferences for v ari ous air carriers and serv i ce options. Howe v er , in response to the Department ' s request for proposals , 40-Mile Air , Inc. , the i ncumbent , w a s the only air carrier to submit a proposal. Nonetheless , we want to gi v e y ou an opportunity to submit any fi n al comments for the record that y ou may have . A cop y of 40-Mile Air ' s proposal is attached to this l etter and may also be accessed online via the Federal Docket Management S y s tem at: http: //www .regulations
. gov/ #! se archResults;rpp = 25 ; po = O ;s= DOT

- OS T

- 1998

- 45 7 4 ;fp=true ; ns = true . I want to give you an opportunity to submit any formal comments for the re c ord before submi tting a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Av iation and Intern ational Affair s . We request that y ou submi t any comments y ou may have as soon as possible , but in any case n o later than March 19 , 2 0 14
. We will carefully consider your comments before submitting a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for a decision. If y ou hav e any questions or if y ou find that y ou need additional time to draft y our comments , p l eas e let me know. Please send your comments to the Department at the following email address: EAS@dot
. go v or b y f ax to 202- 366-7838. If you hav e any questions , please feel fre e to contact me at scott.faulk @ dot
. gov or 2 0 2 -366- 9 967
. Kind Regards, Scott Faulk Transportation Industry Analyst U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Av iation Analy sis EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 1200 Ne w Jer s ey Av e. , SE Washington , DC 20590 202-366-9721

1
Exhibit 32.1





|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|Certification of CEO and CFO                 
|Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,          
|As Adopted Pursuant to                       
|Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Davidson Income Real Estate, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: March 31, 2008   
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: March 31, 2008   



This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-48204 and 333-149809) of Hurco Companies, Inc. of our reports
dated January 12, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Hurco Companies, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of Hurco Companies, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 2010.





/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP





Indianapolis,
Indiana


January
12, 2011


64
INL BIOTECHNOLOGY

Science

The advantages of learningbased control systems are that

they:

• Learn as they operate

• Do not require previous

knowledge or models

• Can determine coupled or

interactive parameters

• Characterize functions

• Determine coupled or

interactive metabolic

processes independently of

growth.

Intelligent Control of Bioprocesses

Artificial intelligence has the potential to incorporate human experience and reasoning

into a computer. By emulating human thought processes and incorporating an

extensive database in each control decision, artificial intelligence can radically alter

the approach to bioprocess control and microbiological research.

Continued on next page
INL BIOTECHNOLOGY

05-GA50193-53

For more information

INL is a U.S. Department of Energy

national laboratory operated by

Battelle Energy Alliance

Charles R. Tolle, Ph.D.

(208) 526-1895

Charles.Tolle@inl.gov

Continued from front

Progress

INL has developed learningbased intelligent control

technologies for microbiological systems such as:

• Iron oxidation by a

mesophilic bacterial

culture, Thiobacillus

ferrooxidans

• Iron oxidation by a mixed

culture of mesophilic and

thermophilic bacteria

• Cultivation of

Methylosinus

trichosporium with the

bubbleless addition of

methane and air.

Selected Publications/

Presentations

D.L. Stoner, A.P. Poloski,

J.A. Johnson, and C.R.

Tolle, “Optimization and

Control of Dynamic

Bioprocesses,” Organic

Process Research & Development, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2001,

pp. 299–307.

D.L. Stoner, K.S. Miller,

D.J. Fife, E.D. Larsen, C.R.

Tolle, and J.A. Johnson,

“Use of an Intelligent Control

System to Evaluate Multiparametric Effects on Iron

Oxidation by Thermophilic

Bacteria,” Applied and

Environmental Microbiology,

Vol. 64, 1998, pp. 4555-4565.

D.L. Stoner and C.R. Tolle,

“Issues Involved with the

Non-Characterized Control of

Methanotrophic Bacteria,”

Proceedings of the 16th

Symposium on Energy

Engineering Sciences. May

13–14, 1998, Argonne

National Laboratory,

Argonne, Illinois, pp. 162–

169, 1998.

Don Maiers

Manager,

Biological Sciences

(208) 526-6991

Donald.Maiers@inl.gov

Technical Contact

Management Contact

D.L. Stoner, C.A. Browning,

D.K. Bulmer, T.E. Ward,

and M.T. MacDonell,

“Direct 5S rRNA Assay for

Monitoring Mixed-Culture

Bioprocesses,” Applied and

Environmental Microbiology,

Vol. 62, 1996, pp. 1969–1976.

J.A. Johnson and H.B.

Smartt, “Advantages of an

Alternative Form of Fuzzy

Logic,” IEEE Transactions on

Fuzzy Logic, Vol. 3, 1995,

pp. 149–157.
Exhibit 10.37

                      SALES CONTRACT OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
                      -------------------------------------
                                                                   NO.:
                                                               SIGNED AT: Tai'an
                                                            DATE: August 8, 2005

This  contract  is  made  and  entered  into  by  and  between   Shandong  Haize
Nanomaterials Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the Seller) and Zhaoyuan Liao
Rubber  Products Co., Ltd  (hereinafter  referred to as the Buyer);  whereby the
Seller agree to sell and the Buyer agree to buy the commodity  mentioned in this
contract subject to the terms and conditions stipulated below:

Article 1: Object, Quantity, Price and Date of Delivery

NAME OF COMMODITY: Nanometre Calcium Carbonate

Trademark: Sheng Ke

Specification: 602

Manufacturer: Shandong Haize Nanomaterials

UNIT: ton

QUANTITY: 2,640

UNIT PRICE: RMB 3,950.00 yuan

TOTAL AMOUNT:  RMB  10,428,000.00  (ten million,  four hundred and  twenty-eight
thousand) yuan

DATE OF DELIVERY: From August 2005 to August 2006, 220 tons each month

Article 2: QUALITY STANDARD

Be subject to the Q/VLT 050-2000 Enterprise Standard.

Article 3: PACKING  STANDARD AND THE PROVISION  AND RECOVERY OF PACKINGS:  Outer
packed with paper bag and inner packed with plastic bag.


<PAGE>

Article  4:  STANDARD  FOR  REASONABLE  WEAR AND TEAR AND  COMPUTING  MODE:  The
quantity  shall be based on the quantity  accepted and put in the storage by the
Buyer.

Article 5: MODE OF TRANSPORAT AND DESTINATION AND COST ALLOCATION:  By road; the
Seller shall pay the cost.

Article 6: STANDARD,  METHOD, and PLACE AND TIME LIMIT OF INSPECTION: Be subject
to enterprise standards.

Article 7: METHOD, TIME AND PLACE OF PAYMENT: By bank draft.

Article 8: TERMINATION OF THIS CONTRACT: In case of being unable to perform this
Contract under special circumstances.

Article 9: METHOD OF SETTLING THE DISPUTE OVER THE CONTRACT:

IN THE PERFORMING OF THIS CONTRACT, IF ANY DISPUTE ARISES, THE TWO PARTIES SHALL
SETTLE IT THROUGH FRIENDLY DISCUSSIONS;  THE DISPUTE CAN ALSO BE MEDIATED BY THE
LOCAL INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERICAL ADMINISTRATION;  IF NO SETTLEMENT COMES FROM THE
DISCUSSIONS OR  MEDIATATIONS,  THE DISPUTE SHALL BE SETTLED BY LAWSUITS  THROUGH
THE PEOPLE'S COURT.

Article 10: THIS CONTRACT SHALL BECOME  EFFECTIVE  after having been  officially
signed by the two parities.

Article 11:  MISCELLANEOUS:  The contract period is one full year, starting from
August, 2005 and ending in August, 2006.


THE SELLER:                                        THE BUYER:
Shandong Haize Nanomaterials Co.,                  Zhaoyuan Liao Rubber Products
Ltd                                                Co.,Ltd

/s/ Ma Zhaowei                                      /s/ Xu Xiaohui
---------------------------------                  -----------------------------
AUTHORISED SIGNATURE                               AUTHORISED SIGNATURE
EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CREDITRISKMONITOR.COM, INC
                         110 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 202
                              Floral Park, NY 11001


               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 2T


March 28, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

                      Re: Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen")

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The purpose of this letter is to address the requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") with respect to issuers that include accountant's
reports from Andersen issued after March 14, 2002 in filings with the SEC.

In connection with the audit of the financial statements of
CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2001 and for the
year then ended, Andersen has issued a report to the Company dated February 21,
2002 (the "Report"). The Report is included in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.

Pursuant to Temporary Note 2T to Item 310 of Regulation S-B the Company has
obtained a letter of representation from Andersen stating that the December 31,
2001 audit was subject to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting
and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate
continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of
national office consultation. Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of
Andersen is not relevant to this audit.


CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc.


By: /s/ Lawrence Fensterstock
    ----------------------------
       Lawrence Fensterstock
       Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 239.11 Appeals.

Applicant appeals will be processed at the district level and forwarded through HQUSACE for review. The HQUSACE may approve an appeal but must forward any recommendation for denial to the DASA(I&H) for review and consideration. DASA(I&H) may approve an appeal but must forward recommendations for denial to the DUSD(I&E) for decision. The DUSD(I&E) is the senior appeals authority for appeals submitted by applicants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        64,167,237
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   3,027,109
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              71,774,201
<CASH>                                          89,917
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           2,791,317
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         154,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              81,275,193
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             54,903,753
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          6,553,559
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                693,643
<COMMON>                                       739,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,325,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                81,275,193
<PREMIUMS>                                  11,666,363
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          4,236,391
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             682,189
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 101,812
<BENEFITS>                                  10,733,726
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    676,659
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,879,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,270,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (806,446)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,077,025
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,077,025
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.07
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         15,186,892
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                          (4,453,166)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             688,132
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            10,456,546
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             42,175,111
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                    (4,453,166)
        

</TABLE>
#### Mary F. Peck et al., trustees of the estate of P. F. W. Peck, appellants, v. Rees Davis Toy Company, appellee.

Gen. No. 29,594.

Suit to recover amount alleged to be due on a written lease. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago;

*629the Hon. Frank E. Reed, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and judgment here for plaintiff for $575.

Opinion filed March 9, 1925.

Rehearing denied March 23, 1925.

E. E. Melum, for appellants; L. J. Haigler, of counsel.

Clarence T. Morse, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.