alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 776.76 Policy. ( a ) It is JAG's policy to investigate and resolve, expeditiously and fairly, all allegations of professional impropriety lodged against covered attorneys under JAG supervision.
( b ) Rules Counsel approval will be obtained before conducting any preliminary inquiry or formal investigation into an alleged violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct (subpart B of this part) or the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct (Code of Judicial Conduct). The Rules Counsel will notify the JAG prior to the commencement of any preliminary inquiry or investigation. The preliminary inquiry and any subsequent investigation will be conducted according to the procedures set forth in this subpart.
### §303903. Preservation education and training program

The Secretary, in consultation with the Council and other appropriate Federal, tribal, Native Hawaiian, and non-Federal organizations, shall develop and implement a comprehensive preservation education and training program. The program shall include—

(1) standards and increased preservation training opportunities for Federal workers involved in preservation-related functions;

(2) preservation training opportunities for other Federal, State, tribal and local government workers, and students;

(3) technical or financial assistance, or both, to historically black colleges and universities, to tribal colleges, and to colleges with a high enrollment of Native Americans or Native Hawaiians, to establish preservation training and degree programs; and

(4) where appropriate, coordination with the National Center for Preservation Technology and Training of—

(A) distribution of information on preservation technologies;

(B) provision of training and skill development in trades, crafts, and disciplines related to historic preservation in Federal training and development programs; and

(C) support for research, analysis, conservation, curation, interpretation, and display related to preservation.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3208.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 303903 | 16 U.S.C. 470a(j). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §101(j), as added Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4008, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4758. |

Section

In paragraph (1), the word "new" is omitted as unnecessary.

In paragraph (2), the word "increased" is omitted as unnecessary.
#### § 37.230 May I use a TIA if a participant is to receive fee or profit?

In accordance with 32 CFR 22.205(b), you may not use a TIA if any participant is to receive fee or profit. Note that this policy extends to all performers of the research project carried out under the TIA, including any subawards for substantive program performance, but it does not preclude participants' or subrecipients' payment of reasonable fee or profit when making purchases from suppliers of goods (*e.g.,* supplies and equipment) or services needed to carry out the research.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of ElkCorp.
 Dated: November 8, 2005By
    
    /s/ Gregory J. FisherGregory J. FisherChief Financial Officer
#### Annabelle M. Wimbush, an Infant, by her Guardian ad Litem, Robert A. Wimbush et al., Respondents, v. John L. Hurdman, Appellant.

Motion for stay granted on condition that appellant argue or submit the appeal at the November 1960 Term, beginning Monday, October 31, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-081-CV

IN RE LLANO ROYALTY, LTD. RELATOR

AND LLANO OPERATING 

CORPORATION D/B/A NORTH 

TEXAS LLANO OPERATING 

CORPORATION

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relators= petition for writ of mandamus, relators=

motion for emergency relief, the response of the real party in interest, and relators=

reply and is of the opinion that all relief should be denied. Accordingly, our March 

24, 2010 stay order is hereby vacated, and relators= petition for writ of mandamus 

is denied.

 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d). 
Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let 

execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: June 17, 2010
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

# OFFICE OF THE  SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO:          Addressees (See Below)

FROM:Director, Risk Management Service

Office of the Secretary

SUBJECT: Amendment to the Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative Agreements 

I.DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me from the Secretary by delegation EA/EAR/165, certified on March 26, 2008, I hereby amend your respective redelegations of authority to perform the functions related to the award, management and oversight of formula and discretionary grants and cooperative agreements within your programmatic authority, certified on April 11, 2008, to include the authority to approve State applications, consolidated State applications, State plans, and consolidated State plans for formula grants.

II. RESERVATIONS

The provisions under the “Reservations” section in the original delegation apply to this amendment.

III.REDELEGATION

The provision under the “Redelegation” section in the original delegation applies to this amendment.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This amendment is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

Page 2 -  Amendment to the Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative Agreements

authority.  I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees prior to the date of certification.

      _________/s/____________

                       Phil Maestri

ADDRESSEE LIST:

Deputy Secretary     ◄▬▬▬

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services 

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

Director, Institute of Education Sciences

Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director for English Language Acquisition

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement

Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ David  Berthiaume, 1/15/2010

Certified Date:    2/2/2010

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number:   EAR/EB/153-A
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000032284
<NAME>                                         Orion Diversified Technologies

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         129,712
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       18,469
<OTHER-SE>                                   (148,181)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .00



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**VINCENT WILLIAM BURSKEY** 

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 145 DB 2015 (No. 78 RST 2015)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 200284** 

**(Allegheny County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25 th**  **day of November, 2015, the Report and Recommendati on**  **of Disciplinary Board Member dated November 16, 2015, is approved and it is**  **ORDERED that Vincent William Burskey, who has been on I nactive Status, has never**  **been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral**  **qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the**  **Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act ive status as a member of the**  **Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation**  **and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit ioner.**
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION **January 17, 201 4**  MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Vehicle Services Consulting, Aston

- Martin, Lotus, and McClaren regarding Tier 3 FROM: Michael Olechiw TO: EPA Docket # EPA

- HQ
- OAR
- 2011
- 0135 This memo documents a meeting held on January 17 , 201 4 between representatives of Vehicle Services Consulting, Aston

- Martin, Lotus, and McClaren and EPA to discuss Tier 3. The attendees and the agenda are shown below. The purpose of the meeting was to clarify points in the Tier 3 rule
. Attendees: Don Kopinski EPA Michael Olechiw EPA Tony Fernandez EPA Lance Tunick Vehicle Services Consulting John Yarrow Aston
- Martin Ian Cawdron Lotus Simon Wood Lotus Rachel Brown McLaren Luca Viadana McLaren Geoff Grose McLaren Peter Montegue McLaren Agenda: 1. Review provisions in the Tier 3 rule specific to small volume manufact urers a. Final fleet average b. Timing and phase

- in c. Credits and credit life
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  Exhibit 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
American Vantage Companies

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statement No. 
333-00905 on Form S-8 of American Vantage Companies of our report dated October 
1, 1998 (except for Note 3 as to which the date is October 22, 1998), relating 
to the consolidated balance sheets of American Vantage Companies as of July 31, 
1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in 
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report 
appears in the July 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Vantage 
Companies.

/s/ BRADSHAW, SMITH & CO.

Las Vegas, Nevada
October 28, 1998
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the quarterly report ofQuixote Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the datehereof (the “Report”), each of the officers of the Company certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

 

1.                                      The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

 

 
| Date:   February 4,  2010 | /s/  BRUCE REIMER                         |
|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                          | Bruce  Reimer, Chief Executive Officer    |
|                                          |                                      |
| Date:   February 4,  2010 | /s/  DANIEL P. GOREY                      |
|                                          | Daniel  P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure.

 

----
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey
### §178k. Disposition of byproducts and strategic and industrially important products

The Secretaries may dispose of any latex, resin, wax, pulp, and any other byproducts, as well as products, other than rubber, developed from agricultural crops which are of strategic and industrial importance, resulting from operations under this subchapter. Dispositions under this section may include sales of the materials involved to other Federal departments and agencies for testing purposes. All moneys received from dispositions under this section shall be paid into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(Pub. L. 95–592, §13, Nov. 4, 1978, 92 Stat. 2533; Pub. L. 98–284, §12, May 16, 1984, 98 Stat. 184.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–284, substituted "The Secretaries" for "The Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Commerce", and inserted ", as well as products, other than rubber, developed from agricultural crops which are of strategic and industrial importance," and "Dispositions under this section may include sales of the materials involved to other Federal departments and agencies for testing purposes."
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  We, Jeffrey A. Ludrof, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Philip A.
Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Jeffrey A. Ludrof

Jeffrey A. Ludrof
President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Philip A. Garcia

Philip A. Garcia
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 October 27, 2004       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Erie Family Life
Insurance Company and will be retained by Erie Family Life Insurance Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. 32
#### (A) In the Matter of Bismark Bennett, Jr., et al., Petitioners, v. Paul D. McGinnis, as Commissioner of Correction, Respondent. (B) In the Matter of William Bowman et al., Petitioners, v. Paul D. McGinnis, as Commissioner of Correction, Respondent. (C) In the Matter of Leon Chaverous et al., Petitioners, v. Paul D. McGinnis, as Commissioner of Correction, Respondent. (D) In the Matter of Ralph A. La Valley et al., Petitioners, v. Paul D. McGinnis, as Commissioner of Correction, Respondent.

Motion in the nature of an application for a writ of mandamus denied, without prejudice to any application by petitioners at the Special Term of the Supreme Court held in the judicial district embracing the county wherein the petitioners are incarcerated (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1287). Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
#### WOODY v. WOODY

No. 581P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 626

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
§ 34.18 Fee and profit. In accordance with 32 CFR 22.205(b), grants and cooperative agreements shall not: ( a ) Provide for the payment of fee or profit to the recipient.
( b ) Be used to carry out programs where fee or profit is necessary to achieving program objectives.
### §591g. Mission of the Office

The Office shall be responsible for coordinating with other Federal efforts and developing a strategy and policy for the Department to plan for, detect, and protect against the importation, possession, storage, transportation, development, or use of unauthorized chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear materials, devices, or agents in the United States and to protect against an attack using such materials, devices, or agents against the people, territory, or interests of the United States.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XIX, §1921, as added Pub. L. 115–387, §2(a)(3), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5163.)
#### IN RE AERIAL DEVICES, INC.

No. 324P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 709

Petition by appellant (Aerial Devices, Inc.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 September 1997.
Exhibit 23.3



|    
|----
|LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

As independent petroleum engineers, Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc. hereby consents to all references to our firm included in
or made a part of Amendment No. 2 (the Amendment) on Form 10-K/A to the EXCO Resources, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and to the use of our reserve report dated January 7,
2010 on the estimated proved oil and natural gas reserve quantities of EXCO Resources, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries presented as of December 31, 2009 (the Report) and further consents to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-159930, 333-156086, 333-132551, 333-133481, and 333-146376) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-142361 and 333-145885) of EXCO Resources, Inc. of our Report and information from the
Report.



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|/S/     ROBERT W.
HAAS                                                   
|Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc. 
Dallas, Texas January 24,
2011
PennFuture is a statewide public interest membership organization founded in 1998, with 

offices across the state. Our Energy Center focuses on helping the transition to a clean energy 

economy. 

We are pleased that DEP is holding this listening session today. And we applaud EPA’s 

announced intention to propose a standard in 2014 to limit industrial carbon pollution from 

existing power plants. Although some are wary of this, EPA’s CO2 standard need not be as 

disruptive as some contend. 

For example, a recent report* from the World Resource Institute (WRI) indicates that 

Pennsylvania can make great strides towards meeting the reductions we expect EPA to propose 

in the rule. WRI outlines five existing policies or increases in activities already under way.

Pennsylvania can reduce power sector CO2 emissions by at least 21 percent below 2011 

levels by 2020 by using existing or slightly modified policies, such as:

1. Meeting Act 129's energy efficiency requirement on electric utilities (11 percent 

reduction from 2011); 

2. Meeting all of the Tier I Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard's 8 percent renewable 

energy requirement with in-state resources (4 percent reduction from 2011); 

3. Increasing the use of combined heat and power (CHP) at commercial and industrial 

facilities by 26 percent (3 percent reduction from 2011); 

4. Increasing the use of existing, high efficiency natural gas plants (3 percent reduction); 

and

5. Improving the efficiency of existing coal plants (2 percent reduction).

Once the rule on existing power plants has been formally proposed, PennFuture looks 

forward to working with the Department and many other voices in Pennsylvania to develop our

state implementation plan to determine how the standards will be met here.

PennFuture is especially interested in employing strategies that will help keep electricity 

prices stable. For example, improving power plant efficiency will likely cost less than changing 

fuel sources at plants.

We do know that overall costs to society will drop with cleaner fuel sources, due to all 

the public health problems and associated costs, like lost productivity, that will be avoided as a 

result in years to come.

As the third largest emitter of global warming pollution, it’s clear that Pennsylvania 

needs to take seriously the charge to reduce emissions from existing sources.

Thank you.

Submitted Joy Bergey on behalf of PennFuture, December 9, 2013

Bergey@pennfuture.org

																																																							 *

 Power Sector Opportunities for Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Pennsylvania, October 2013, 

www.wri.org/publication/power-sector-opportunities-reducing-carbon-dioxide-emissions-pennsylvania