alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5949. Hostile fire pay

(a) The head of an Executive agency may pay an employee hostile fire pay at the rate of $150 for any month in which the employee was—

(1) subject to hostile fire or explosion of hostile mines;

(2) on duty in an area in which the employee was in imminent danger of being exposed to hostile fire or explosion of hostile mines and in which, during the period on duty in that area, other employees were subject to hostile fire or explosion of hostile mines; or

(3) killed, injured, or wounded by hostile fire, explosion of a hostile mine, or any other hostile action.

(b) An employee covered by subsection (a)(3) who is hospitalized for the treatment of his or her injury or wound may be paid hostile fire pay under this section for not more than three additional months during which the employee is so hospitalized.

(c) An employee may be paid hostile fire pay under this section in addition to other pay and allowances to which entitled, except that an employee may not be paid hostile fire pay under this section for periods of time during which the employee receives payment under section 5925 of this title because of exposure to political violence or payment under section 5928 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title XI, §1111(a), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1238.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title XI, §1111(c), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1238, as amended by Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1084(h)(3), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2064, provided that: "Section 5949 of title 5, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), is effective as if enacted into law on September 11, 2001, and may be applied with respect to any hostile action that took place on or after that date."
### §1608. Separability

If any provision of this chapter, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of the chapter, and the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title IV, §418, 53 Stat. 1290.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

See section 1610 of this title.
### §2117. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the chapter and of the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 89–502, §18, July 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 286.)
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Tectonics Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended May 27, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William F. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Robert L. Laurent, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ William F. Mitchell


William F. Mitchell


Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Robert L. Laurent, Jr.


Robert L. Laurent, Jr.


Chief Financial Officer





July 11, 2011





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed to be filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,865<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,239
<PP&E>                                         211,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,984
<BONDS>                                         85,898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           139
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,864
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,542
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,935)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,299)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,636)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,636)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.28)
<FN>
<F1>Includes restricted short-term investments of $2,957.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to November 23, 2021)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

None Available

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
# A AEROVIEW v - - 

# v

Mr.Jim Williams 

### VAS Integration Office Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591
June 25[11 2015 ' Re: Re: Docket FAA 2015-0630, Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 11666 Dear 

### Mr. Williams: AeroView Services, LLC received FAA Exemption No. 11666 on May 22, 2015 authorizing AeroView Services, 

### LLC (AeroView) under section 333 of the 

### FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to operate an unmanned aircraft system ("UAS"), the Trimble Navigation UX5 , for various commercial purposes. In this present petition for an amendment to Exemption No. 11666, AeroView seeks to 

### operate the Trimble UX5 hp UAS for 

### the same purposes. The requested amendment to add the UX5 hp to exemption 11666 is consistent with amendment 11110A granted to Trimble Navigation to include the UX5 hp. See exemption 11110A (May 7, 2015 ; docket FAA-2014-0367).

# A AEROVIEW

S E 1 I '- 

# v

The UX5 hp, has a minimal weight and power increase to allow for an increase in payload. This allows the UX5 hp to carry a slightly larger camera. The larger camera will provide higher resolution for the finished survey product. The power increase will allow for better performance in high altitude areas ofthe country and flexibility to increase payload in the future. The physical dimensions and operating characteristics ofthe UX5 hp are the same as the UX5 model approved in exemption 

### 11666. AeroView Services, LLC will comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed in Exemption 11666 except that condition/limitation number one wilJ need to be revised to include the Trimble UX5 hp UAS. Other than this revision, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public safety that were the basis for the initial grant ofexemption. Supporting documents listed as exhibits one through five were emailed to 333exemptions@faa.gov on June 25, 2015 . Trimble has requested that the proprietary information in exhibits one through five remain confidential in our amendment submission. Please note that the UX5 hp has the same operating and safety characteristics as the UX5 . Exhibits one through four are the same as submitted 

### in support of exemption 

### 11666. The official documentation has not yet been updated to include the UX5 hp. Exhibit 5 is the UX5 hp data sheet containing the updated weight and power specifications. Physical dimensions are the same as the UXS. As the requested amendment will not set a new precedent or otherwise raise an y novel issue, AeroView Services, LLC seeks to begin these operations without delay, AeroView Services, LLC respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause

# A AEROVIEW

!3::C'1viCES 

# v

exists to dispense with publication of the summary of this petition in the Federal Register and grant the requested amendment expeditiously by summary means. Thank you for your consideration ofthis petition.
Respectfully submitted,

Ryan Murguia President Aero View Services, LLC

Encl: cc: ZachPieper
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Lancer Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-36393) on Form S-8 of Lancer Corporation of our report dated February 29,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Lancer Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, and related consolidated
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of Lancer Corporation.






                                                  KPMG LLP

San Antonio, Texas
February 29, 2000
### §403–3. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403–3, comprising section 103 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3025 of this title.
#### VSA, INC., d/b/a VSA CAROLINAS v. MURIEL K. OFFERMAN, Secretary of Revenue, in her official capacity

No. 319PA97

(Filed 6 February 1998)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 126 N.C. App. 421, 485 S.E.2d 348 (1997), reversing an order allowing defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment entered by Cashwell, J., on 3 April 1996 in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 December 1997.

*Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, RL.L.C., by Jasper L. Cummings, Jr., for plaintiff-appellee.*

*Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Kay Linn Miller Hobart, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of EDO Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the six month period ended June 28, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I James M.
Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respect, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ James M. Smith
------------------------
James M. Smith
Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2003
Confidential Treatment Requested

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              SCHEDULE 1 TO _____
        INDIVIDUAL DEVIATIONS FROM STANDARD NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT BY CURRENT MEMBERS OF MANAGEMENT BOARD(1)
        ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                                    Deducted
                           For reporting      Geographic       Industry     Term;   Compensation;   payments;      Penalty;
                           period             scope;ss.1       scope;ss.1   ss.1    ss.2            ss.2           ss.5
-------------------------- ------------------ ---------------- ----------- -------- ------------- ---------------- --------
<S>                        <C>                 <C>             <C>         <C>      <C>           <C>              <C>
Kai-Uwe Ricke              1.1. to
                           31.12.2003         ---Confidential Material Redacted and Filed Separately with the Commission---
-------------------------- ------------------ ---------------- ----------- -------- ------------- ---------------- --------
Dr. Karl-Gerhard Eick      1.1. to
                           31.12.2003         ---Confidential Material Redacted and Filed Separately with the Commission---
-------------------------- ------------------ ---------------- ----------- -------- ------------- ---------------- --------
Thomas Holtrop(2)          1.1. to
                           31.12.2003         ---Confidential Material Redacted and Filed Separately with the Commission---
-------------------------- ------------------ ---------------- ----------- -------- ------------- ---------------- --------
Dr. Heinz Klinkhammer(3)   1.1. to
                           31.12.2003         ---Confidential Material Redacted and Filed Separately with the Commission---
-------------------------- ------------------ ---------------- ----------- -------- ------------- ---------------- --------
Rene Oberman               1.1. to
                           31.12.2003         ---Confidential Material Redacted and Filed Separately with the Commission---
-------------------------- ------------------ ---------------- ----------- -------- ------------- ---------------- --------
Konrad F. Reiss            1.1. to
                           31.12.2003         ---Confidential Material Redacted and Filed Separately with the Commission---
-------------------------- ------------------ ---------------- ----------- -------- ------------- ---------------- --------
</TABLE>


--------

1 Josef Brauner's agreement was cancelled by mutual consent and he resigned
effective April 30, 2004.

2 Thomas Holtrop has resigned effective September 30, 2004.

3 Since Dr. Klinkhammer joined our Company on April 1, 1996 and is the most
senior member of our Management Board, the wording of his agreement deviates
from the standard agreement in language, but not in substance, and certain
details, which the Company believes are insignificant, differ from the standard
agreement.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00667-CV

In re State of Texas ex rel. David Escamilla, Travis County Attorney

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

After relator State of Texas ex rel. David Escamilla, Travis County Attorney, filed

a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay, this Court granted relator’s

emergencymotion and temporarily stayed all proceedings in the trial court on real party in interest’s

pending application for writ of habeas corpus, trial court cause number 17-1228-C368. Relator has

now filed an emergencymotion for stay of proceedings and motion for show-cause hearing, seeking

to prevent the trial court from proceeding on a second application for writ of habeas corpus filed

by real party in interest in the same county and assigned cause number 17-1428-C425.

We grant relator’s emergency motion and stay all trial court proceedings in cause

number 17-1428-C425 and any and all other actions arising from the underlying contempt order that

is the subject of the dispute, pending further order of this Court. In addition, we grant relator’s

motion for show-cause hearing. Therefore, it is hereby ordered that Carissa Beene shall appear in

person before this Court on Wednesday, November 29, 2017, at 1:30 p.m., in the Third Court of

Appeals courtroom, located on the first floor of the Price Daniel, Sr. Building, 209 West 14th Street,
in Austin, Travis County, Texas, to show cause why she should not be held in contempt and have

sanctions imposed for her failure to obey our October 12, 2017 order.

It is so ordered November 20, 2017.

Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland

2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-41127 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICHARD JUDD HOLLOWAY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:96-CR-50-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 18, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Richard Judd Holloway has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed counsel's brief and the record, and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.E.1



                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                             1995 COMPENSATION PLAN
                           FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

         Pursuant to Sections 4.2 and 8.7 of the El Paso Energy Corporation 1995
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, Amended and Restated Effective as
of January 1, 1998 (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows,
effective April 1, 1998:

         Section 4.1 is amended to read as follows:

         "4.1     MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES

                  Subject to Section 4.2, the maximum number of shares of Common
         Stock which may at any time be awarded under the Plan is three hundred
         thousand (300,000) shares of Common Stock. Awards may be from shares
         held in the Company's treasury or issued out of authorized but unissued
         shares of the Company, or partly out of each, as shall be determined by
         the Management Committee, subject to, and reduced by (on a post-split
         basis), the number of shares of Common Stock awarded prior to the
         occurrence of a two-for-one stock split effected by the Company in the
         form of a 100% stock dividend on April 1, 1998."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on this 1st day of April, 1998.


                                         EL PASO ENERGY CORPORATION


                                         By:  /s/ JOEL RICHARDS III
                                            ------------------------------------
                                              Joel Richards III
                                              Executive Vice President
                                              Member of the Management
                                                 Committee
Attest:

/s/ David L. Siddall
----------------------------
    David L. Siddall
    Corporate Secretary
#### § 750.61 Scope of subpart D.

This section provides information on payment of claims against the United States, not payable under any other statute, caused by the act or omission, negligent, wrongful, or otherwise involving fault, of Department of the Navy (DON) military and civilian personnel (hereinafter DON personnel) acting outside the scope of their employment.
Exhibit 10.2


 


THIRD
AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS THIRD AMENDMENT
(this “Amendment”) is made as of this 5th day of April, 2006 to that
certain AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of May 15, 2002, as
amended (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), by and between CHARLES D.
FRAZER (“Employee”) and JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (“Employer”).


 


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE
CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged,
Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement,
hereby amend the Employment Agreement as follows:


 


1. Subject to earlier
termination otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the last day of
the Employment Period shall be January 31, 2008.


 


2. Effective February 26,
2006, Employee’s Base Salary shall be $226,000.00.


 


Except as specifically
amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this
Amendment and the terms of the remainder of the Employment Agreement, the terms
of this Amendment shall control and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not
defined herein shall have those respective meanings attributed to them in the
Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed a part of the
Employment Agreement for all purposes.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first
above written.


 


JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS,
INC.


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/  Robert N. Wildrick

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Charles D. Frazer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Robert N. Wildrick,

  	
  CHARLES D. FRAZER

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 15.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111310 and 333-152335) pertaining to the Employees' Stock Option Plans of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd of our report dated March 11, 2015 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. Included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014.




Tel-Aviv, Israel

March 11, 2015
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
A Member of Ernst & Young Global