alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-11079

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Demetrius Nathaniel Butler, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-349-1

______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Demetrius 

Nathaniel Butler has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Butler has not filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 25, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-11079 Document: 00516763750 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/25/2023
No. 22-11079

2

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th 

Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-11079 Document: 00516763750 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/25/2023
#### SCHLITT, Respondent, v. UNION RY. CO. OF NEW YORK CITY, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

Action by Anna Sehlitt against the Union Railway Company of New York City. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

H. A. Robinson (F. A. Gaynor and Bayard H. Ames, of counsel), for appellant.

S. S. Koenig, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

MacLEAN, J. (dissenting).

A medical man, who said on his cross, “I don’t know how many cases I am interested in against the same company,” volunteered again and again to tell complaints made to him by the plaintiff. It was error to deny the motions, promptly made, to strike out these too willingly given gratuities, and so let hearsay, not even asked for, go to the jury accompanied with the consideration attaching to the observation of a physician of 20 years’ practice. The same professional person, having testified that the plaintiff was suffering from some concussion of the brain, and he was led by certain symptoms to believe that there was evidence of concussion of the brain, was not suffered, upon cross-examination by the defendant, to answer questions tending to test the accuracy of his diagnosis, and also to show that that term might mean with him something less serious than could be attributed to it. Furthermore, in summing up, counsel for the co-defendant Waite and counsel for the plaintiff made statements as of the law applicable to the cause, imposing a liability not incurred by the defendant appellant. To each such statement exception was taken, but the learned trial justice neither rebuked the untoward utterances in answer to the exceptions nor corrected them in his charge. In my opinion the judgment should be reversed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Visitoractivities**
 
2012:Winter
2013:Spring | Winter
2014:Spring| Winter
2015:Spring | Winter
2016:Winter
2017:Spring | Winter
2018:Winter
 
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.21/2: M 56/2/
Item Number:0650-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001058623
 
May 29, 2018
### Stratigraphy and structure of the Strawberry Mine roof pendant, central Sierra Nevada, California

By: W. J. Nokleberg**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1154

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

Oh 'behalf of EfieltnetnationatAirp(yrt~ lam writing to express our strong support 

for the Delta Air Lines application for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval ofDelta' s new service would be a major benefit for our region, where 

many corporations have a strong trade and market presence with Japan. With 5 daily 

flights between ERI and Detroit Metro Airport, our businesses would benefit from 

convenient connections to Tokyo's Haneda airport. Our community, too, would enjoy 

the enhanced relationship building benefit that would result should this application be 

granted. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia. This summer Delta is adding 

new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to 

make it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition of-Haneda as a destination is a natural 

fit that would clearly benefit our business travelers. 

Thank you for consideration ofthis request. 

Erie Regional Airport Authority 

Erie International Airport, Tom Ridge Field 

. opher L. Rodgers 

xecutive Director 

4411 West 12th Street • Erie, Pennsylvania 16505-3091 

Phone: 814/833-4258 • Fax: 814/833-0393 • www.erieairport.org
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Mechanistic evaluation of test data from LTPP flexible pavement test sections,final report [electronic resource].**
 
Final Report | Final Report:Appendices
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30:98-020; TD 2.30:98-012
Item Number:0982-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001061251
 
July 12, 2018
### §924. Threat assessment screening of port truck drivers

Not later than 90 days after October 13, 2006, the Secretary shall implement a threat assessment screening, including name-based checks against terrorist watch lists and immigration status check, for all port truck drivers with access to secure areas of a port who have a commercial driver's license but do not have a current and valid hazardous materials endorsement issued in accordance with section 1572 1 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, that is the same as the threat assessment screening required for facility employees and longshoremen by the Commandant of the Coast Guard under Coast Guard Notice USCG–2006–24189 (Federal Register, Vol. 71, No. 82, Friday, April 28, 2006).

(Pub. L. 109–347, title I, §125, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1900.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "part 1572".
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350),
the undersigned, Robert L. Collins, Chief Executive Officer of ECC
International Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of the
Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                       
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Robert L. Collins                                 
| |  |                                                       
| |  | Robert L. Collins
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003
Exhibit 11

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<PAGE>



                                   Exhibit 11
                 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
                                                        Three Months Ended                          Twelve Months Ended
                                                            October 31,                                 October 31,
                                           -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    2000                  1999                  2000                  1999
                                           -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands, except per share amount)
                                              Basic     Diluted     Basic    Diluted      Basic     Diluted     Basic     Diluted
                                           -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>         <C>         <C>       <C>       <C>         <C>       <C>         <C>
Net income                                  $ 3,567     $ 3,567     $ 674     $ 674     $ 5,035     $ 5,035   $ 1,802     $ 1,802

Weighted average shares
  outstanding                                 5,954       5,954     5,951     5,951       5,952       5,952     5,980       5,980

Assumed issuances under
  stock options plans
                                                  -          62         -        50           -          67         -          81
                                           -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              5,954       6,016      5,951    6,001       5,952      6,020      5,980       6,061


Earnings per common share                    $ 0.60      $ 0.59     $ 0.11   $ 0.11      $ 0.85     $ 0.84     $ 0.30      $ 0.30
                                           =========================================================================================
</TABLE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

_______________________

FORM 8-K

_______________________

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 20, 2007

MS Structured Asset Corp.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

Delaware
      001-16443, 333-64879
      13-4026700(State or Other Jurisdiction
        of Incorporation)
      (Commission File
        Numbers)
      (IRS Employer
        Identification No.)


1585 Broadway, Second Floor
          New York, New York
          Attention: Madhu Philips
      10036(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
      (Zip Code)




Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

Not Applicable

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)



Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):



o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))










---











Section 8Other Events



| | Item 8.01 | Other Events
| | --------- | ------------



Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS), BellSouth Debenture Backed Series 2002-6 Trust (the Trust) (New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol MJX) has liquidated its assets and terminated.



On February 13, 2007, in response to the redemption notice by JPM Capital, the Swap Counterparty for the Trust notified the Trust of its intent to exercise its call option representing its right to call the all of the underlying securities owned by the Trust.  On February 20, 2007, the Swap Counterparty exercised its call option.



In respect of the Class A Units, the amount of the distribution was $25.09 per Class A Unit, representing the full Unit Principal Balance of the Class A Units plus accrued interest in respect of the Class A Units through and excluding February 20, 2007.



In respect of the Class B Units, the amount of the distribution was $24,007 per Class B Unit.





| |  | 
| |  | 





---











SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.



Date: February 22, 2007



MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.

(Registrant)

By:/s/ Madhu Philips

Name: Madhu Philips

Title:   Vice President













| |  | 
| |  |
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As Adopted Pursuant to Section
                     906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)

I, John R. Peeler, the Chief Executive Officer and President of Acterna
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

(1)     the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
        quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), filed with the U.S.
        Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2003

/s/ John R. Peeler
---------------------------
John R. Peeler
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.2(a)
                                                            
                                                            
                 Executive Protection Policy
                              
                              DECLARATIONS

                              EXECUTIVE PROTECTION POLICY

                              Policy Number  8132-05-32C

                              Federal Insurance Company, a stock
                              insurance company, incorporated
                              under the laws of Indiana, herein
                              called the Company.

Item 1.   Parent Organization:
          ROUNDY'S, INC.

          23000 ROUNDY DRIVE
          PEWAUKEE, WISCONSIN
          53072

Item 2.   Policy Period:      From 12:01 A.M. on NOVEMBER 01, 1998
                              To   12:01 A.M.    NOVEMBER 01, 2001
                              Local time at the address shown in
                              Item 1.

Item 3.   Coverage Summary
          Description
          GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
          EXECUTIVE LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION

Item 4.   Termination of
          Prior Policies:  8132-05-32C

THE EXECUTIVE LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION, FIDUCIARY LIABILITY,
OUTSIDE DIRECTORSHIP LIABILITY AND EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY
COVERAGE SECTIONS (WHICHEVER ARE APPLICABLE) ARE ALL WRITTEN ON A
CLAIMS MADE BASIS.  EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED, THESE COVERAGE
SECTIONS COVER ONLY CLAIMS FIRST MADE AGAINST THE INSURED DURING
THE POLICY PERIOD.  PLEASE READ CAREFULLY.

In witness whereof, the Company issuing this policy has caused
this policy to be signed by its authorized officers, but it shall
not be valid unless also signed by a duly authorized
representative of the Company.

                  FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
                              
HENRY A. GULICK                         DEAN R. OFFURE
_______________________                 ______________________
Secretary                               President


OCTOBER 15, 1998                        ROBERT HAMBURGER
_______________________                 ----------------------
Date                                    Authorized
                                        Representative
§ 552.102 Requirements for possession and use. DOD military and civilian personnel, their family members, USAR/NG personnel and civilians employed on, visiting or traveling through this installation may possess legally-defined and privately-owned firearms, ammunition, BB and pellet guns, knives, bows and arrows, and crossbows under the following conditions: ( a ) Privately-owned firearms, crossbows, BB and pellet guns possessed or stored on the installation must be registered at the installation Provost Marshal's Office within three working days after arrival on the installation, or after obtaining the weapon, except: ( 1 ) Firearms legally brought onto the installation for the purpose of hunting or firing at an approved firing range, and only for the period of time the person possessing the firearms is hunting or firing on the range.
( 2 ) Firearms carried by federal, state, county or local law enforcement personnel when in the performance of official law enforcement duties.
( 3 ) Firearms carried or transported, in full compliance with Georgia State Laws, on Georgia State Highways 119 and 144 by personnel traveling through the installation only. Travel off of these state highways or stopping, other than for emergency purposes, while on the installation is prohibited.
( b ) Personnel residing in family housing, BOQ, BEQ/VOQ and guest housing, may store legally-acquired, authorized ammunition, knives with a blade measuring more than 3 inches, bows and arrows, registered crossbows, registered BB and pellet guns and registered firearms within their quarters.
( c ) Personnel residing in troop billets may store legally-acquired authorized ammunition, knives and blades measuring more than 3 inches, bows and arrows, registered crossbows, registered BB and pellet guns and registered firearms in unit arms rooms. The unit arms room should utilize a standard weapons card and log book to document storage, removal, and return.
( d ) Persons using weapons borrowed from another must have the documentation required in § 552.103(a) as applicable in their possession when carrying, transporting or using the weapon on the installation.
( e ) Persons under the age of 17 must be accompanied by a person over the age of 21 who will be responsible for compliance with the requirements of this regulation while hunting or target shooting on the installation and when purchasing legal arms (including knives with blades over 3 inches) and ammunition from installation retail outlets.
( f ) Persons must be in compliance with federal and state laws regarding possession (*i.e.*, age, criminal record restrictions, etc.)
( g ) Storage, accountability and registration procedures will be IAW Army Regulation 190-11 and supplements.
(May 5, 1964)

#### In the Matter of Fred J. Parise et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Irving B. Seidman et al., Respondents-Appellants.

In a summary proceeding brought pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law: (a) to permanently *678restrain distribution by the respondents Seidman et al. of any literature describing themselves as the regular candidates of the Democratic party for the position of Assemblyman and certain party positions in the First Assembly District, Kings County, to be voted upon at the forthcoming primary election of said party to be held June 2, 1964; and (2) for other incidental relief, the parties cross-appeal as follows from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 30, 1964, which, on said respondents’ motion, *inter alia*dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to the institution of *“*a plenary action in a form prescribed by law ”: (1) The petitioners appeal from so much of the order as dismissed the petition. (2) The respondents Seidman et al. appeal from the order insofar as it failed to grant to them a declaratory judgment and injunction against certain of the petitioners’ acts, as demanded in said respondents’ answer to the petition. Order, insofar as appealed from by the respective parties, affirmed, without costs. A summary proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law does not lie for the purposes set forth in the petition. Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### § 2400.35 Duration of classification.

Foreign government information shall not be assigned a date or event for automatic declassification unless specified or agreed to by the foreign entity.