alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

November 6, 2023 

MEMORANDUM TO ALL DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES

SUBJECT: Policy Statement on Alternative Dispute Resolution 

The U.S. Department of Education (ED) is committed to maintaining a positive work environment 

that promotes productivity and individual growth by working to resolve workplace-related issues at 

the lowest possible level. The Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Center provides a forum to 

informally resolve employment disputes before the disputes advance to a formal complaint stage. 

The ADR process is used to resolve a wide range of workplace disputes, including Equal 

Employment Opportunity (EEO) and grievance-related matters, in a cooperative, cost-effective, and 

timely manner. All employees are strongly encouraged to cooperate and engage in the ADR 

process. Participation in the ADR process is voluntary for a complainant in an EEO matter. If a 

complainant in an EEO matter elects to participate in ADR, ED shall provide a management official 

to participate in the ADR process.

The use of ADR methods encourages participants to cooperate and engage in open and honest 

dialogue, focus on common interests, and use creative problem-solving methods to arrive at their 

own resolutions. Most importantly, use of ADR methods can help foster a collaborative 

organizational culture in which all employees are treated with dignity and respect in support of 

reaching their full potential and maximizing their contributions to ED’s mission.

ED offers an online course, “Leading Others Through Conflict,” in the FedTalent System, which is 

available to all employees to learn about the ADR process. I encourage each of you to take the 

training and use the ADR process to help resolve workplace disputes that may arise. 

For additional information on the ADR process, please contact the ADR Center by telephone at 

(202) 245-7520, by e-mail at ADR_center@ed.gov or visit their Web site at 

https://connected.ed.gov/ofo/Pages/Alternative-Dispute-Resolution-Center.aspx

Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D.
### §5536. Extra pay for extra services prohibited

An employee or a member of a uniformed service whose pay or allowance is fixed by statute or regulation may not receive additional pay or allowance for the disbursement of public money or for any other service or duty, unless specifically authorized by law and the appropriation therefor specifically states that it is for the additional pay or allowance.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 484.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 51. | R.S. §170. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 69 (less 1st 34 words). | R.S. §1764 (less 1st 34 words). |
| | 5 U.S.C. 70. | R.S. §1765. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 71. | June 20, 1874, ch. 328, §3, 18 Stat. 109. |
| | | Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §7, 68 Stat. 1228. |

Statutes at Large

Sections are consolidated as R.S. §1765 includes the scope of R.S. §170, R.S. §1764, and the Act of June 20, 1874, as amended. So much of R.S. §1764 as relates to details is covered by section 5535.

R.S. §170 was part of title IV of the Revised Statutes. The Act of July 26, 1947, ch. 343, §201(d), as added Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, §4, 63 Stat. 579 (former 5 U.S.C. 171–1), which provides "Except to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this Act [National Security Act of 1947], the provisions of title IV of the Revised Statutes as now or hereafter amended shall be applicable to the Department of Defense" is omitted from his [sic] title but is not repealed.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:51 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Subject: RE: BB4 - Further Discussion?

Hi Bob,

Let’s just wait until the comments come in.

Thanks, Cortney

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:47 AM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Subject: BB4 - Further Discussion?

Cortney –

Do we still need to schedule further discussion specifically on BB4, or would you prefer to just wait until we get the written comments from the interagency and just go from there?

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code D243-01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Office: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document - FOIA Exempt

*************************************
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference of our report dated March 1, 1999 and to all references to our 
firm, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into the Company's 
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-59041, 
333-59043, 333-47433, 333-03769, 333-03771 and 333-09549) and on Form S-3 
(File No. 333-34345).

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 26, 1999
§ 37.710 What standards do I include for purchasing systems of nonprofit organizations? ( a ) So as not to force system changes for any nonprofit participant, your expenditure-based TIA will provide that each nonprofit participant's purchasing system comply with standards that conform as much as practicable with requirements that apply to the participant's other Federal awards.
( b ) If your TIA is a fixed-support award, you need only require nonprofit participants to flow down the requirements listed in appendix E to this part.
[68 FR 47160, Aug. 7, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 51246, Aug. 19, 2020]
S I 0-100322-0 5 I

INTERNATIONA L AIPPOR T 

## Eas/ t o an d through . Marc h 11,201 0 Th e Honorabl e Raymon d H , LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Doclce t DOT-OST-20I0-WB I Dea r Mr . Secretary : Than k yo u fo r th e opportunity t o expres s ou r suppor t fo r th e applicatio n fo

r antitrus t immunit y and propose d join t

busines s agreemen

t file d b y America

n Airline s and Japa

n Airlines . Th e propose d allianc e between thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo r oneworl d t

o compet e effectively wit

h th e Sta r an d SkyTea malliance . Thi s increase d interallianc e competitio n wil l i

n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o f

tli e Department' s Open Skie s polic y - first b y solidifyin g U.S.-Japa

n Ope n Skies , then b y sei-vin

g a s afoundatio n fo

r furthe r liberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte r athoroug h review , w e encourag e the Departmen t o f Transportatio n to approv e thi s applicatio n a s i

t woul d enabl e thes e oneworl d allianc e airline s t o wor k closel y togethe

r t o delive r highl y competitiv e air

transportatio n services . Approva l fo r AA/JAL allianc e will have apositiv e impac t

on ai r trave l b y offering customer s more service , schedulin g an d pricin g option s an

d wil l hel p to ensur

e tha t customer s continu e to benefi t fro mhavin g tliree competitiv e air

alliance s to choos e from . I urg e yo u to quickl y approv e thi s application . Sincerely , "~ J



# lA k — t Iftikha r Ahma d Director

Owne d an d Operate d by th e City o f Dayto n 360 0 Termina l Driv e - Suit e 30 0 - Vandalia , Ohi o 45377-109 5 (937 ) 454-8200/1-877-FLYDAY 1 Telephon e * (937 ) 454-828 4 Fax * www.flydayton.co m
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herman Guerrero, Appellant.

[834 NYS2d 471]—

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), dated April 28, 2006, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court rendered November 6, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree *879and robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the -order is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree in exchange for a promise that he would be sentenced to a determinate prison term of 12 years on each count, to run concurrently with each other. He was sentenced to the promised term. Neither the sentencing minutes nor the court’s order of commitment mentioned the imposition of any period of postrelease supervision. Therefore, the sentence actually imposed by the court never included, and does not now include, any period of postrelease supervision *(see Hill v United States ex rel. Wampler,*298 US 460 [1936]; *People v Wilson,*37 AD3d 855 [2007]; *People v Noble,*37 AD3d 622 [2007]; *Earley v Murray,*451 F3d 71 [2006], *rearg denied*462 F3d 147 [2006]; *but see People v Sparber,*34 AD3d 265 [2006], *lv denied*8 NY3d 885 [2007]). Under these circumstances, the defendant received precisely the sentence for which he bargained, and therefore he has failed to articulate any reason why his judgment of conviction, upon his plea of guilty, should be vacated *(cf. People v Catu, 4*NY3d 242 [2005]). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10. Crane, J.P., Krausman, Covello and Garni, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF THE ELDER-BEERMAN STORES CORP. FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,798
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,013
<INVENTORY>                                    221,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               364,798
<PP&E>                                          66,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 474,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,765
<BONDS>                                        155,236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       266,698
<OTHER-SE>                                    (53,274)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   474,087
<SALES>                                        409,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               427,878
<CGS>                                          293,384
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  293,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,689
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                       998
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,628
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,628
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Duckwall-Alco Stores, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended May 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and will be retained by Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  June 17, 2011


By: ___/s/ Wayne S. Peterson _____


Wayne S. Peterson


SVP – Chief Financial Officer
§ 634.52 Search incident to impoundment based on criminal activity. Search of a POV in conjunction with impoundment based on criminal activity will likely occur in one of the following general situations: ( a ) The owner or operator is not present. This situation could arise during traffic and crime-related impoundments and abandoned vehicle seizures. A property search related to an investigation of criminal activity should not be conducted without search authority unless the item to be seized is in plain view or is readily discernible on the outside as evidence of criminal activity. When in doubt, proper search authority should be obtained before searching.
( b ) The owner or operator is present. This situation can occur during either a traffic or criminal incident, or if the operator is apprehended for a crime or serious traffic violation and sufficient probable cause exists to seize the vehicle. This situation could also arise during cases of intoxicated driving or traffic accidents in which the operator is present but incapacitated or otherwise unable to make adequate arrangements to safeguard the vehicle. If danger exists to the police or public or if there is risk of loss or destruction of evidence, an investigative type search of the vehicle may be conducted without search authority. (Air Force, see AFP 125-2).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Washington Corporation and Subsidiaries and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         740,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,452,293
<PP&E>                                      26,515,100
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,513,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,453,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          348,465
<BONDS>                                     22,898,870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,069
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,810,480)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,453,924
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,598,743
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,415,745
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,558,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (185,035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (185,035)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.A







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009,
of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
James J. Cleary, President, certify (i) that the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
   /s/ James J.
      ClearyJames J.
      ClearyPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)El Paso
      Natural Gas CompanyNovember 6,
      2009
         A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural Gas Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Preventive medicine in World War II**
 
Volumes: 
PDFs:
Two | Three  | Four | Five  | Six | Seven  | Nine
HTML:
Eight
 
SuDoc Number:D 104.11: P 92/
Item Number:0352-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:001057566
 
May 17, 2018
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Hours and Earnings in the United States, 1932-40: With Supplement for 1941

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					,	Olenin, Alice					 and 	Corcoran, Thomas F. 						*Hours and Earnings in the United States, 1932-40: With Supplement for 1941 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 697*,										1942,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/408,			accessed on August 30, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### **CHAPTER 104—PLANT PROTECTION**

Sec.
7701.
Findings.
7702.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—PLANT PROTECTION

7711.
Regulation of movement of plant pests.
7712.
Regulation of movement of plants, plant products, biological control organisms, noxious weeds, articles, and means of conveyance.
7712a.
Reduction in backlog of agricultural export petitions.
7713.
Notification and holding requirements upon arrival.
7714.
General remedial measures for new plant pests and noxious weeds.
7715.
Declaration of extraordinary emergency and resulting authorities.
7716.
Recovery of compensation for unauthorized activities.
7717.
Control of grasshoppers and Mormon crickets.
7718.
Certification for exports.
7719.
Methyl bromide.
7720.
National plan for control and management of Sudden Oak Death.
7721.
Plant pest and disease management and disaster prevention.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

7731.
Inspections, seizures, and warrants.
7732.
Collection of information.
7733.
Subpoena authority.
7734.
Penalties for violation.
7735.
Enforcement actions of Attorney General.
7736.
Court jurisdiction.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

7751.
Cooperation.
7752.
Buildings, land, people, claims, and agreements.
7753.
Reimbursable agreements.
7754.
Regulations and orders.
7755.
Protection for mail handlers.
7756.
Preemption.
7757.
Severability.
7758.
Repeal of superseded laws.
7759.
Fees for inspection of plants for exporting or transiting.
7760.
State terminal inspection; transmission of mailed packages for State inspection; nonmailable matter; punishment for violations; rules and regulations by United States Postal Service.
7761.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

7771.
Authorization of appropriations.
7772.
Transfer authority.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL AND ERADICATION

7781.
Definitions.
7782.
Establishment of program.
7783.
Grants to weed management entities.
7784.
Agreements.
7785.
Relationship to other programs.
7786.
Authorization of appropriations.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00239

- CV

J EFFREY P OLK K ILLIAN

, Appellant

V

.

A NGELA N ICOLE K ILLIAN

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 16th District Court

of Denton County (16

- 04048

- 16)

September 27, 2018

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEA LS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth