alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 6, 2006

|MS Structured Asset Corp.                         
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

|Delaware                                        | 333-101155                | 13-4026700                        
|----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                                               
|(State or Other Jurisdiction  of Incorporation) | (Commission File  Number) | (IRS Employer  Identification No.)



|1585 Broadway, Second Floor  New York, New York  Attention: Madhu Philips | 10036     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------
|                                                                         
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                                  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

|Not Applicable                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





---







Section 8Other Events



| | Item 8.01 | Other Events
| | --------- | ------------



On February 2, 2006, the Company issued a press release regarding the occurrence of a Trust Wind-Up Event under the terms of the Trust Agreement governing SATURNS Trust No. 2004-3, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.





| |  | 
| |  | 





---







SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.



Date: February 6, 2006

MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.

(Registrant)

By: /s/ Madhu Philips

Name:     Madhu Philips
Title:     Vice President





| |  | 
| |  | 





---







EXHIBIT INDEX

|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release, dated February 2, 2006
|------------ | -------------------------------------







| |  | 
| |  | 





---
(September 23, 1963)

#### Jean De Spirito et al., Respondents, v. Bernard Levine, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury and loss of services, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 19, 1963 on the court’s own motion after a pretrial conference, which granted a preference in trial. Order reversed, without costs; preference Vacated; and action restored to its regular position on the calendar. The record fails to disclose any basis for the granting of a preference (cf. *Abramson*v. *Kenwood Labs.,*17 A D 2d 626; *Sinclair*v. *Amherst Bldrs. Supply & Fuel Corp.,*19 A D 2d 560). Beldock, P. J,, Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.     In connection with the quarterly report of Educational Development Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Date: July 23, 2007 By /s/ Randall W.White             Randall W. White    President and Chief Executive Officer         Date: July 23, 2007 By /s/ Marilyn R. Welborn             Controller and Corporate Secretary    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1652

DORIS O. MONROE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY G. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CA-99-584-1)

Submitted: October 3, 2001 Decided: October 16, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

J. Kevin Morton, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Benjamin H.

White, Jr., United States Attorney, Mary Ann Sloan, Regional Chief

Counsel, Dennis R. Williams, Deputy Regional Chief Counsel, John C.

Stoner, Assistant Regional Counsel, Brian C. Huberty, Assistant

Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Doris O. Monroe appeals the district court’s order granting

the Commissioner’s motion to remand to the Social Security Administration (SSA) pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g)

(West Supp. 2001). Monroe argues the district court erred in remanding to the SSA because she met listing 9.09 in 20 C.F.R. Pt.

404, Subpt. P, App. 1 (1998) at the time her administrative review

became final. She argues the SSA’s subsequent deletion of listing

9.09 should not affect her claim for disability insurance benefits.

We review the district court’s remand to the Commissioner for abuse

of discretion. See Higgins v. Apfel, 222 F.3d 504, 505 (8th Cir.

2000); Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir.), cert.

denied, 531 U.S. 1038 (2000); Nelson v. Apfel, 210 F.3d 799, 802

(7th Cir. 2000). Because we conclude the district court did not

abuse its discretion in remanding, we affirm. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Part C—Office of Science and Technology

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subtitle D of title II of Pub. L. 107–296, which was classified to part D of this subchapter, was redesignated subtitle C of title II of Pub. L. 107–296 by Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(2)(K), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4178, and transferred to this part.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subtitle C of title II of Pub. L. 107–296, which was classified to this part, was redesignated subtitle B of title II of Pub. L. 107–296 by Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(2)(K), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4178, and transferred to part B (§141 et seq.) of this subchapter.
### §2423. Joint breeders

(a) When two or more persons are the breeders, one person (or the successor of the person) may apply, naming the others.

(b) The Secretary, after such notice as the Secretary may prescribe, may issue a certificate of plant variety protection to the applicant and such of the other breeders (or their successors in interest) as may have subsequently joined in the application.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title II, §53, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1548; Pub. L. 103–349, §13(g), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3143.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–349, §13(g)(1), substituted "one person (or the successor of the person)" for "one (or his successor)".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–349, §13(g)(2), substituted "the Secretary" for "he" before "may".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of EXCO Resources, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge,
that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.



|                        |  |                                          
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: February 26, 2009 |  | /s/    DOUGLAS H. MILLER                 
|                        |  | Douglas H. Miller Chief Executive
Officer
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/    J. DOUGLAS RAMSEY                 
|                        |  | J. Douglas Ramsey Chief Financial
Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
§ 536.68 Appeal or reconsideration. ( a ) An appeal or a request for reconsideration will be acknowledged in writing. A request for reconsideration under subpart D of this part invokes the six-month period during which suit cannot be filed, 28 CFR 14.9(b). The acknowledgment letter will underscore this restriction.
( b ) Where the contents of the appeal or request for reconsideration indicate, additional investigation will be conducted and the original action changed if warranted. Except for subpart J of this part, which sets forth separate rules for FCCs, if the relief requested is not warranted the settlement authority will forward the claim to a higher settlement authority with a claims memorandum of opinion (see § 536.62) stating the reasons why the request is invalid.
Note to § 536.68 :
See also DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-78.
§ 750.4 Claims: In general. ( a ) *Claims against the United States.* Claims against the United States shall receive prompt and professional disposition. Every effort will be made to ensure an investigation is thoroughly and accurately completed, the claimant's allegations evaluated promptly, and where liability is established, a check issued as quickly as possible to prevent further harm to a meritorious claimant. Similarly, claims not payble will be processed promptly and the claimant advised of the reasons for the denial.
( b ) *Claims in favor of the United States.* Potential claims in favor of the United States will be critically evaluated and, where appropriate, promptly asserted and aggressively pursued.
( c ) *Assistance to claimants.* Claimants or potential claimants who inquire about their rights or the procedures to be followed in the resolution of their claims should be referred to the Tort Claims Unit Norfolk. The Tort Claims Unit Norfolk will provide claims forms, advise where the forms should be filed, and inform the requester of the type of substantiating information required. Claims officers may provide advice on the claims process but shall not provide advice or opinions about the merits or the wisdom of filing a particular claim. While claims officers have a responsibility to provide general information about claims, they must consider 18 U.S.C. 205, which makes it a crime for an officer or employee of the United States to act as an agent or an attorney in the prosecution of any claim against the United States.
[57 FR 4722, Feb. 7, 1992, as amended at 72 FR 53418, Sept. 19, 2007]
#### § 1806.2 Definitions.

*NACIC* means the National Counterintelligence Center and include all staff elements of NACIC.

*Process* means a summons complaint, subpoena, or other official paper (except garnishment orders) issued in conjunction with a proceeding or hearing being conducted by a federal, state, or local government entity of competent jurisdiction.

*Employee* means any NACIC officer, any staff, contract, or other employee of NACIC, any person including independent contractors associated with or acting for or on behalf of NACIC, and any person formerly having such a relationship with NACIC.

*NACIC Counsel* refers to the NACIC employee designated by NACIC to manage legal issues and regulatory compliance.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 20 23- 0669 LT Case No. 2021

- CF

- 010881

_____________________________ C HRISTIAN M. Y UMA , A ppellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , A ppellee.

_____________________________ O n appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County
. R. Anthony Salem , Judge
. Ol ivia M. Goodman, of O’Brien Hatfield, P.A, Tampa , for Appellant. A shley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee. June 18, 2024
P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . E DWARDS , C.J. , and M AKAR and L AMBERT , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
#### BOONE v. VINSON

No. 555P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 604

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
§ 935.151 Island permit for boat and vehicle. ( a ) No person may use a privately owned motor vehicle or boat on Wake Island unless he has an island permit for it.
( b ) The operator of a motor vehicle shall display its registration number on the vehicle in a place and manner prescribed by the Commander.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6838

LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge. (1:88-cr-00112; 1:04-cv-1282) Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 8, 2006 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Larry Arnold Young seeks to appeal from the district court’s order construing his motion for modification of his sentence as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and denying relief because this was a successive motion for which authorization had not been obtained. We find that the district court properly construed the motion as one under § 2255. SeeRaines v. United States , 423 F.2d 526, 528 & n.1 (4th Cir. 1970); see also Gonzalez v. Crosby , 125 S. Ct. 2641, 2647 (2005) (where a motion is “in substance a successive habeas petition,” it “should be treated accordingly”). Because Young’s motion was properly construed as a § 2255 motion, the order denying the motion is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Jones v. Braxton , 392 F.3d 683 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional c laims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).- 3 - We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Young has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FORM 6-K



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



Washington, D.C. 20549



Report of Foreign Issuer



Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of



Securities Exchange Act of 1934



For the month of July 2006



ABBEY NATIONAL PLC

(Translation of registrant's name into English)



Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regents

Place, London NW1 3AN, England

(Address of principal executive offices)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . .



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Yes . . . . . . . No . . .X. . . .









---

















GRUPO SANTANDER - DIRECTOR CHANGES



Following the resignation presented by Francisco Gómez Roldán as CEO of Abbey for personal reasons (to be effective from 21 August 2006), Santander Boards Executive Committee has resolved to propose the following appointments to the Board of Directors of Grupo Santander and to the Boards of Abbey and Santander Totta:



Antonio Horta Osorio, until now Executive Chairman of Santander Totta and a Non-Executive Director of Abbey, will take office as Chief Executive Officer of Abbey with effect from 21 August 2006, subject to FSA approval.



Antonio Horta Osorio will also become Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Santander Totta.



In turn, Nuno Amado, presently Executive Vice Chairman of Santander Totta, will assume the position of Chief Executive Officer of Santander Totta.



Jorge Morán, General Manager (EVP) of the Group and to date Chief Operating Officer of Abbey, will be appointed as Head of the new Global Insurance Division. Jorge Morán will continue to hold office as a Non-Executive Board Member of Abbey but will relinquish his role as Chief Operating Officer of Abbey with effect from 21 August 2006.



Francisco Gómez Roldán will continue to hold office as a Non-Executive Board Member of Abbey and a General Manager (EVP) of Grupo Santander.



A further confirmatory announcement will be made once all Board and Regulatory approvals have been given.



Media Enquiries:



|Matthew Young (Abbey)    | Tel: 00 44 20 7756 4232
|------------------------ | -----------------------
|                         |                        
|Peter Greiff (Santander) | Tel: 00 34 61 5909 582 
|                         |                        
|Angela Roche (Santander) | Tel: 00 34 91 2892 398 













---















SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



| | ABBEY NATIONAL PLC
| | ------------------





| | Dated: 07th July 2006 | By / s / Shaun Coles   | 
| | --------------------- | ---------------------- | 
| |                       | (Authorised Signatory) | 
| |                      
| |                       |                        |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>                     <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       10,712                  10,712
<SECURITIES>                                      0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                30,178                  30,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                    605                     605
<INVENTORY>                                  14,204                  14,204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             57,852                  57,852
<PP&E>                                       24,123                  24,123
<DEPRECIATION>                               10,370                  10,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              106,827                 106,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        33,567                  33,567
<BONDS>                                      85,277                  85,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        13,686<F2>              13,686<F2>
<PREFERRED>                                       0                       0
<COMMON>                                   (31,244)                (31,244)
<OTHER-SE>                                        0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                106,827                 106,827
<SALES>                                      42,542                  76,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             42,542                  76,434
<CGS>                                        33,412                  58,658
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                33,412                  58,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                283                     305
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,914                   4,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,086                   1,417
<INCOME-TAX>                                    412                     528
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             674                     889
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                       0
<CHANGES>                                         0                       0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    674                     889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0<F1>                   0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0<F1>                   0<F1>
<FN>

<F1> Earnings per share is not calculated in accordance with FAS No. 128.

<F2> Preferred stock-mandatory includes preferred stock units.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### §2008b. Socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers; qualified beginning farmers and ranchers

In the case of a loan guaranteed by the Secretary under subchapter I or II to a socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher (as defined in section 2003(e) of this title) or a qualified beginning farmer or rancher, the Secretary may provide for a standard guarantee plan, which shall cover an amount equal to 95 percent of the outstanding principal of the loan.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §367, as added Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5306, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4673.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2008b, Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §367, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2317, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4008; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title VII, §701(g), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1879, related to limited transfer authority of loan amounts, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §755, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1131.