alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert C. Stempel, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Energy Conversion
  Devices, Inc.;

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
  a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
    prepared;

    b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
    the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
    fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
    reporting; and

  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
  our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
  the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
  directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
    likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
    summarize and report financial information; and

    b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting.

                                               /S/ Robert C. Stempel
  Date: May 10, 2005                           --------------------------------
                                               Robert C. Stempel
                                               Chief Executive Officer
FOCUS (2/23/2004) Page #1 INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: ID Number: P-04-0269

ENGINEER: J PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: 3M
USE: Battery cathode material.

OTHER USES: None found.

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: Wear safety glasses with side shields, protective gloves (neoprene, nitrile rubber). Respirator: Avoid breathing dust and fumes (during heating). Use a NIOSH approved respirator based on airborne concentration of contaminants and in accordance with OSHA regulations. Health Effects: May cause allergic skin reaction and allergic respiratory reaction. Contains a chemical or chemical which can cause gan effects. TLV/PEL:

CRSS (02/02/2004): Chemical Name: S-H20: <0.000001 g/L VP: <0.000001 torr @ MW: 10000.00 %<500 %<1000 (see NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS section for MW)

Molecu
Phys State: NEAT: Solid; MFG: Solid; PROC/FORM: Solid, 40% PMN in slurry; END USE: solid

Consumer Use:

SAT (02/03/2004): Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P3B1T2 Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 3 all releases to waterFOCUS (2/23/2004) Page #2 INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: ID Number: P-04-0269

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: This IRER was completed with ChemSTEER version July 24, 2003.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: NoFOCUS (2/23/2004) Page #3 INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: ID Number: P-04-0269
Processing Number of Sites: 1 unknown customer site Days/yr: 5 (submission)

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Incineration or Land: **PMN:** 700 kg/yr

from:

basis:

Note:

Water: Not expected, s assessed to landfill or incinerationFOCUS (2/23/2004) Page #4 INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: ID Number: P-04-0269
Processing : continued

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSUR Tot. # of workers:

Inhalation:
Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: basis:FOCUS (2/23/2004) Page #5 INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: ID Number: P-04-0269
Processing : continued

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY: continued

Dermal:FOCUS (2/23/2004) Page #6 INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: ID Number: P-04-0269

Use Number of Sites: 5 (submission states 3-5 unknown end user sites) Days/yr: 50 (submission)
Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY
Water, Incineration or Land: **PMN:** 17.8 kg/site-day over 50 days/yr or 4,450 kg/yr

from:

basis:

Note:FOCUS (2/23/2004) Page #7 INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: ID Number: P-04-0269

Use : continued

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY: continued Incineration or Land: **PMN:** 1,400 kg/yr

from:

basis:

Note:

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSU Tot. # of workers:

Inhalation:FOCUS (2/23/2004) Page #8 INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: ID Number: P-04-0269
Use - Battery production: continued

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY: continued Dermal:
EXHIBIT 10.34
                                                                   -------------


                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT
                              ---------------------

     THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into
effective as of December 12, 2005, by and between SPEECHSWITCH, INC., a New
Jersey corporation (the "Company"), and CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP, a Delaware
limited partnership (the "Investor").

                                    Recitals:
                                    ---------

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Investor entered into an Escrow Agreement
dated August 31, 2005 (the "Escrow Agreement").

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual promises,
conditions and covenants contained herein and in the Escrow Agreement and other
good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as follows:

     1.   Termination. Each of the parties to this Agreement hereby terminate
          the Escrow Agreement and the respective rights and obligations
          contained therein. As a result of this provision, none of the parties
          shall have any rights or obligations under or with respect to the
          Escrow Agreement.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed and delivered this Termination
Agreement on the date first set forth above.



SPEECHSWITCH, INC.                        CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP


By:_________________________              By:  Yorkville Advisors, LLC
Name:   Bruce Knef                        Its: General Partner
Title:  CEO
                                          By:_________________________
                                          Name:   Mark A. Angelo
                                          Title:  Portfolio Manager





                                          ESCROW AGENT


                                          By: ________________________
                                          Name:   David Gonzalez, Esq.
### §1517. Separability

The sections of this subchapter and subdivisions of sections are declared to be separable, and in the event any one or more sections or parts of the same of this subchapter be held to be unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of other sections or parts of sections of this subchapter.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title V, §517, 52 Stat. 77; Pub. L. 110–234, title XII, §12033(c)(2)(B), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1405; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XII, §12033(c)(2)(B), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2167.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–246, §12033(c)(2)(B), substituted "this subchapter" for "this chapter" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
Exhibit 15.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111310 and 333-152335) pertaining to the Employees' Stock Option Plans of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. of our report dated March 10, 2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015.
  Tel-Aviv, Israel

March 10, 2016

KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER

A Member of Ernst & Young Global
### §1742. Determination of commodity value for set-aside

Quantities of commodities shall not be included in the commodity set-aside which have an aggregate value in excess of $2,500,000,000. The value of the commodities placed in the commodity set-aside, for the purpose of this section, shall be the Corporation's investment in such commodities as of the date they are included in the commodity set-aside, as determined by the Secretary.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title I, §102, 68 Stat. 897.)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11191

Conference Calendar

 

WILLIAM T. HENDERSON, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TDCJ;

BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES; Individually 

and in Their Official Capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-CV-2209-X

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1997

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William T. Henderson, Jr., Texas inmate # 280766, appeals

the dismissal of his civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2). The motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis

(IFP) is GRANTED. The PLRA requires a prisoner appealing IFP in

a civil action to pay the full amount of the filing fee, $105. 
No. 96-11191

- 2 -

As Henderson lacks sufficient funds to pay the full filing fee,

he is assessed a partial filing fee of $12.18. See

§ 1915(b)(1)(A). The agency having custody of Henderson is

directed to forward payment of the partial filing fee from his

prisoner account to the clerk of the district court.

Additionally, Henderson is required to make monthly payments of

twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his

account until the full filing fee is paid. See § 1915(b)(2). 

The agency having custody of Henderson is directed to forward the

appropriate payments from his account to the clerk of the

district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10

until the full filing fee of $105 is paid. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it

dismissed Henderson’s complaint as frivolous and malicious. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Bailey v. Johnson, 846 F.2d 1019,

1021 (5th Cir. 1988). The appeal is without arguable merit and

thus frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th

Cir. R. 42.2. Henderson is hereby WARNED that any future

frivolous or malicious filings will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, he should review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous or malicious.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit
      10.28

     

    GigaBeam
      Corporation

    Summary
      of 2006 Bonus Plan


    


    On
      February 3, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
      Company approved bonus and performance goals for executive officers and other
      Company personnel for the 2006 year as the 2006 Bonus Plan. Key aspects of
      the
      Plan and basis for performance payments are as follows:

    


    ● Bonus
      payments would be made based upon attainment of specified levels of both annual
      revenues and annual earnings before interest, taxes and certain compensation
      charges. A sliding scale for specific bonus calculations would be used should
      revenue and earnings before charges noted fall between identified target
      levels.

    


    ● No
      bonuses will be paid if the Company does not attain a minimum annual revenue
      level of $20,000,000 for 2006, as well as calculated projected earnings before
      charges levels. 

    


    ● Individual
      employees may receive bonus payments ranging from a minimum of 13% of their
      base
      salaries if the minimum financial goals are met to multiples of base salary
      levels if the Company achieves revenues of, for example, $50,000,000 or more,
      based upon audited results for the 2006 year. 

    


    ● Additionally,
      attainment of individual identified performance goals for the employees covered
      in the Plan will be factored into any ultimate bonus payment to the employee.
      

    


    ● Bonuses
      would only be calculated and paid, if earned, to the covered group of employees
      if they are individually employed and actively working for the Company as of
      December 31, 2006.
#### § 809a.1 Random installation entry point checks.

The installation commander determines when, where, and how to implement random checks of vehicles or pedestrians. The commander conducts random checks to protect the security of the command or to protect government property.
AIR-11-388-E 

September 1, 2011 

 Exemption No. 8429C 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2004-18023 

Mr. Scott G. Peterson, Director 

Regulatory & Quality System Oversight 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes 

P.O. Box 3707, Mailcode 67-XC 

Seattle, WA 98124-2207 

Dear Mr. Peterson: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8429, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated July 15, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of The Boeing Company (Boeing) for an extension of Exemption No. 8429, as 

amended. That exemption from § 45.29 (b)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) allows Boeing to affix temporary registration marks that are less than 12 inches tall 

on certain aircraft during production acceptance flights.

In your petition, you indicate there has been no change in the conditions, public interest and 

safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8429, as 

amended, remains valid for this exemption and is in the public interest. We will allow the use 
 2

of “window numbers” at the following locations: (1) Boeing Field; (2) Renton Municipal 

Airport; and (3) Paine Field Everett.

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8429, as amended, to 

October 31, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8429, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8429. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Frank P. Paskeiweiz 

Acting Deputy Director 

 Aircraft Certification Service 

Enclosure
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.B

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ending March 31, 2003, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                  /s/ GREG G. GRUBER
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Greg G. Gruber
                                               Senior Vice President, Chief
                                                    Financial Officer
                                                      and Treasurer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

                                          June 20, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural
Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### § 755.2 Scope.

This chapter provides for assessments against the pay of members of the naval service in satisfaction of claims for property damage caused under certain circumstances. Claims for damage, loss, or destruction of privately owned property caused by a person or persons in the naval service, are payable under Article 139, UCMJ, only if such damage, loss, or destruction is caused by riotous conduct, willful conduct, or acts showing such reckless or wanton disregard of the property rights of others that willful damage or destruction is implied. Acts of the type punishable under Article 109, UCMJ, are cognizable under Article 139, UCMJ. Charges against pay under these regulations shall be made only against the pay of persons shown to have been principal offenders or accessories.
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.217 Limitation—Reconsiderations. A discharge review shall not be subject to reconsideration except: ( a ) When the only previous consideration of the case was on the motion of the NDRB;
( b ) When the original discharge review did not involve a personal hearing and a hearing is now desired, and the provisions of § 724.216 do not apply;
( c ) When changes in discharge policy are announced after an earlier review of an applicant's discharge, and the new policy is made expressly retroactive;
( d ) When the NDRB determines that policies and procedures under which the applicant was discharged differ in material respects from policies and procedures currently applicable on a service-wide basis to discharges of the type under consideration, provided that such changes in policies or procedures represent a substantial enhancement of the rights afforded an applicant in such proceedings;
( e ) When an individual is to be represented by counsel or representative, and was not so represented in any previous consideration of the case by the NDRB;
( f ) When the case was not previously considered under uniform standards published pursuant to Pub. L. 95-126 and such application is made within 15 years after the date of discharge; or
( g ) On the basis of presentation of new, substantial, relevant evidence not available to the applicant at the time of the original review. The decision whether evidence offered by an applicant in support of a request for reconsideration is in fact new, substantial, relevant, and was not available to the applicant at the time of the original review will be based on a comparison of such evidence with the evidence considered in the previous discharge review. If this comparison shows that the evidence submitted would have had a probable effect on matters concerning the propriety or equity of the discharge, the request for reconsideration shall be granted.
Exhibit 32a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of International Bancshares Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis E. Nixon, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By:   | /s/DENNIS E. NIXONDennis E. Nixon President
| |  | ----- | -------------------------------------------
| |  | Date: | February 29, 2008                          

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether on and before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks