alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (32.2)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Eastman Kodak Company (the "Company") for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antoinette P. McCorvey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antoinette P. McCorvey











Antoinette P. McCorvey


Chief Financial Officer


August 7, 2012
No. 227.

#### McCay Engineering Company *v.*United States.

Appeal from the Court of Claims.

Argued March 11, 12, 1920.

Decided March 22, 1920.

*Mr. George A. King,*with whom *Mr. M. Walton Hendry*and *Mr. George R. Shields*were on the brief, for appellant.

*Mr. Assistant Attorney General Davis,*with whom *Mr. Chas, F. Jones*was on the brief, for the United States.

*Per Curiam.*

Affirmed by an equally divided court. Mr.

Justice McReynolds took no part in the decision of this case.
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.101 Government's right of subrogation, indemnity, and contribution.

The Air Force becomes subrogated to the rights of the claimant upon settling a claim. The Air Force has the rights of contribution and indemnity permitted by the law of the situs or under contract. Do not seek contribution or indemnity from ANG members whose conduct gave rise to Government liability.

[81 FR 83698, Nov. 22, 2016]
Page  3  -  Delegation of Authority 

## MEMORANDUM

**TO:**The Assistant Secretary for 

                    Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

**FROM:**The Secretary

**SUBJECT:**Delegation of Programmatic Authority

I.DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. §3472, as amended, I hereby delegate to you, your successor in function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the programmatic authorities described in the attached appendix.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authorities delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

#### II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following are not delegated:

A. the authority to sign documents for publication in the Federal Register other than those documents designated in the blanket delegation of authority to sign Federal Register documents to Principal Officers, EA/EH/66, certified on June 14, 1994;

### B. the authority to appoint members of advisory councils and fix compensation; and

C.unless otherwise provided by law, the authority to submit reports to Congress or the President.

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to applicable provisions of law, and unless otherwise noted, you may redelegate any of the authorities delegated to you, and may authorize further redelegation. All redelegations must be prepared in accordance with the Administrative Communications System directive, A:GEN:1-104, Delegations of Authority, dated November 6, 1997.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Departmental Delegations Control Officer.  Except for necessary close-out, servicing, or continuation activities related to the programs not listed in the Appendix for which authority previously was delegated, this delegation supersedes all previous delegations of these authorities.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressee prior to the date of certification.

______________/s/__________ 

Richard W. Riley

Attachment

___/s/ Theodore Sky, 5/14/99_____

###### OGC Clearance and Date

###### Certification Date:  6/3/99

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

###### Control No.  EA/EH/77

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

# Delegation of Authority 

APPENDIX

**Note: “I” above has been transferred to HHS pursuant to the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (Public Law 113-128) enacted on 7/22/14**

PAGE
§ 536.118 Related statutes for maritime claims. ( a ) The AMCSA permits the settlement of claims that would ordinarily fall under the Suits in Admiralty Act (SIAA), 46 U.S.C. app. 741-752; the Public Vessels Act (PVA), 46 U.S.C. app. 781-790; or the Admiralty Extension Act (AEA), 46 U.S.C. app. 740. Outside the United States the AMCSA may be used to settle admiralty claims in lieu of the Military Claims Act or Foreign Claims Act. Within the United States, filing under the AMCSA is not mandatory for causes of action as it is for the SIAA or PVA.
( b ) Similar maritime claims settlement authority is exercised by the Department of the Navy under 10 U.S.C. 7363 and 7621-23 and by the Department of the Air Force under 10 U.S.C. 9801-9804 and 9806.
§ 2400.26 Access by historical researchers and former Presidential appointees. ( a ) The requirement in Section 4.1(a) of Executive Order 12356 that access to classified information may be granted only as is essential to the accomplishment of authorized and lawful Government purposes may be waived as provided in paragraph (b) of this section for persons who: ( 1 ) Are engaged in historical research projects, or
( 2 ) Previously have occupied policy-making positions to which they were appointed by the President.
( b ) Waivers under paragraph (a) of this section may be granted only if the Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy: ( 1 ) Determines in writing that access is consistent with the interest of national security;
( 2 ) Takes appropriate steps to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure or compromise, and ensures that the information is safeguarded in a manner consistent with Executive Order 12356;
( 3 ) Limits the access granted to former presidential appointees to items that the person originated, reviewed, signed, or received while serving as a presidential appointee; and
( 4 ) Has received a written agreement from the researcher or former presidential appointee that his notes can be reviewed by OSTP for a determination that no classified material is contained therein.
#### Selden Property Associates, Respondent, v TBS Enterprises, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action to compel the removal of an encroachment on plaintiff’s real property and for damages, defendant TBS Enterprises, Inc., appeals (1) as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 2, 1978, as, upon granting plaintiff’s motion to discontinue the action and cancel the *lis pendens,*awarded costs against it, (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated April 18, 1978, as, upon granting plaintiff’s motion to cancel the notice of pendency, awarded costs against it, and (3) from a judgment of the same court, entered April 25, 1978, which only awarded costs in favor of the plaintiff and against it. Orders reversed insofar as appealed from, and judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and no costs are to be imposed against appellant. TBS Enterprises, Inc. (appellant), a former owner and current purchase-money mortgagee of certain real property in Coram, Suffolk County, was asked to join in a stipulation of discontinuance after a settlement was effected between the other parties to the within action with respect to an encroachment on plaintiff’s premises. Appellant, as mortgagee, requested of plaintiff that a copy of the settlement instruments be sent to it, in order to ascertain if the security of its mortgage had been in any manner impaired. It claimed that it never "received all the closing papers; hence, by its attorney, it refused to sign the stipulation. Upon the factual circumstances of the case, we hold that the appellant was justified in refusing to execute the stipulation until it had received a copy of all the settlement documents and that the imposition of costs against it was an improvident exercise of discretion (see CPLR 3217). Cohalan, J. P., Margett, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



 
 

Exhibit 10.36    
    


Assignment and Assumption  


        This Assignment and Assumption is made by and among Century Gold LLC, a Nevada limited liability company ("Century"), Donald J. Decker and Suzanne R.
Decker, as Joint Trustees of the Decker Ridge Joint Revocable Trust (collectively "Decker"), and Victory Gold Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Victory"). 


Recitals  


A.    Century,
Decker and Frank W. Lewis, as trustee of the Frank Lewis Trust, and Sharon F. Lewis, as trustee of the Sharon Lewis Trust (collectively "Lewis") are parties to an Agreement
for Purchase dated June 29, 2005 (the "Option Agreement"), pursuant to which Lewis granted to Century the option ("Option") and right to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares
of F.W. Lewis, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("FWLCO") and Century has exercised the Option. 


B.    Century
and Decker (collectively "ASSIGNOR") and Victory are parties to the Agreement for Assignment and Assumption of Option Agreement ("Assignment Agreement") pursuant to which
Assignor agreed to assign the Option Agreement to Victory. 


C.    Assignor
agreed to execute and deliver an assignment of the Option Agreement. 



        In
consideration of the parties' rights and obligations under the Assignment Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties
acknowledge, the parties agree as follows: 


        1.     ASSIGNOR
assigns, conveys and transfers to Victory, and Victory's successors and assigns forever, all of ASSIGNOR's right, title and interest in, to and under the
Assignment Agreement and in and to the FWLCO shares. 


        2.     Victory
assumes and agrees to perform ASSIGNOR's obligations under the Assignment Agreement. 


        Dated
effective December 9, 2005. 



	CENTURY GOLD LLC	 	DECKER RIDGE JOINT REVOCABLE TRUST
	

By:	

/s/  DONALD J. DECKER      
 Donald J. Decker, Manager	
 	

By:	

/s/  DONALD J. DECKER      
 Donald J. Decker, Joint Trustee
	
VICTORY GOLD INC.	
 	

By:	

/s/  SUZANNE R. DECKER      
 Suzanne R. Decker, Joint Trustee
	By:	/s/  MICHAEL B. RICHINGS      
 Michael B. Richings, President	 	 	 




1











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.36
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.6 Signature on the claim form. The claimant or authorized agent signs the claim form in ink using the first name, middle initial, and last name. ( a ) *Claim filed by an individual.* ( 1 ) A married woman signs her name, for example, Mary A. Doe, rather than Mrs. John Doe.
( 2 ) An authorized agent signing for a claimant shows, after the signature, the title or capacity and attaches evidence of authority to present a claim on behalf of the claimant as agent, executor, administrator, parent, guardian, or other representative; for example, John Doe by Richard Roe, Attorney in Fact. A copy of a current and valid power of attorney, court order, or other legal document is sufficient evidence of the agent's authority.
( b ) *Claim with joint interest.* Where a joint ownership or interest in real property exists, all joint owners must sign the claim form. This includes a husband and wife signing a claim if the claim is for property damage. However, only the military member or civilian employee signs the claim form for a claim under the Military Personnel and Civilian Employees' Claims Act.
( c ) *Claim filed by a corporation.* ( 1 ) A corporate officer signing the form must show title or capacity and affix the corporate seal (if any) to the claim form.
( 2 ) If the person signing the claim is other than the corporate officer they must: ( i ) Attach to the claim form a certification by a proper corporate officer that the individual is an agent of the corporation duly authorized to file and settle the claim;
( ii ) Affix to the claim form the corporate seal (if any) to the certification.
( d ) *Claim filed by a partnership.* A partner must sign the form showing his or her title as partner and list the full name of the partnership.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

ERRATA

August 24, 2007

Appeal No. 06-M830

IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC

Precedential Opinion

Decided: August 20, 2007

In the opinion for the court, t he following changes have been made:

On page 8, lines 15-16, " Quantum Corp. v. Plus Development Corp. , 940 F.2d 642, 643

(Fed. Cir. 1991)" has been replaced with " Quantum Corp. v. Tandon Corp. , 940 F.2d

642, 643 (Fed. Cir. 1991)".

On page 21, line 9, “patentee” has been changed to “party”.
Exhibit 12.2  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Paul Victor, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Sasol Limited;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarise and report financial information; and  b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: 27   September 2016By:
/s/ PAUL VICTORPaul VictorChief Financial Officer
#### §§ 705.27-705.28 [Reserved]
### Part C—United States Secret Service
### §1139. Information sharing

#### (a) Intelligence sharing

The Secretary shall ensure that the Department of Transportation receives appropriate and timely notification of all credible terrorist threats against public transportation assets in the United States.

#### (b) Information Sharing and Analysis Center

#### (1) Authorization

The Secretary shall provide for the reasonable costs of the Information Sharing and Analysis Center for Public Transportation (referred to in this subsection as the "ISAC").

#### (2) Participation

The Secretary—

(A) shall require public transportation agencies that the Secretary determines to be at high risk of terrorist attack to participate in the ISAC;

(B) shall encourage all other public transportation agencies to participate in the ISAC;

(C) shall encourage the participation of nonprofit employee labor organizations representing public transportation employees, as appropriate; and

(D) shall not charge a fee for participating in the ISAC.

#### (c) Report

The Comptroller General shall report, not less than 3 years after August 3, 2007, to the appropriate congressional committees, as to the value and efficacy of the ISAC along with any other public transportation information-sharing programs ongoing at the Department. The report shall include an analysis of the user satisfaction of public transportation agencies on the state of information-sharing and the value that each system provides the user, the costs and benefits of all centers and programs, the coordination among centers and programs, how each center or program contributes to implementing the information sharing plan under section 1203,1 and analysis of the extent to which the ISAC is duplicative with the Department's information-sharing program.

#### (d) Authorization

#### (1) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section—

(A) $600,000 for fiscal year 2008;

(B) $600,000 for fiscal year 2009;

(C) $600,000 for fiscal year 2010; and

(D) such sums as may be necessary for 2011, provided the report required in subsection (c) of this section has been submitted to Congress.

#### (2) Availability of funds

Such sums shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XIV, §1410, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 412.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1203, referred to in subsec. (c), is section 1203 of title XII of Pub. L. 110–53, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 383, which amended section 114 of Title 49, Transportation, and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 114 of Title 49.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### ANDREW THOMAS HARTSELL v. INTEGON INDEMNITY CORPORATION

No. 342A97

(Filed 5 December 1997)

Insurance § 472 (NCI4th)— leased vehicle — destruction by fire — payment to lessor as loss payee — claim by lessee

The trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff insured’s claim against defendant insurer for the value of his leased vehicle which was stolen and destroyed by fire because the insurer paid the named loss payee, the lessor, the actual cash value of the vehicle where the policy provided that a loss was to be paid “as interest may appear to [the insured] and the loss payee”; after the loss plaintiff continued to make lease payments for the full duration of the lease; and the plaintiff is thus entitled to insurance proceeds to the extent of his interest in the vehicle as of the date of the loss.

Am Jur 2d, Automobile Insurance §§ 41, 42, 137-139.

Automobile property insurance-sole, unconditional, or absolute ownership clause. 71 ALR2d 223.

What constitutes ownership of automobile within meaning of automobile insurance owner’s policy. 36 ALR4th 7.

*386Appeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 126 N.C. App. 511,485 S.E.2d 893 (1997), affirming an order entered by Johnson (E. Lynn), J., on 27 November 1995 in Superior Court, Moore County, which allowed defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Heard in the Supreme Court 17 November 1997.

*Robbins May & Rich, L.L.P, by P. Wayne Robbins and Carol M. White, for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Kitchin, Neal, Webb & Futrell, P.A., by Stephan R. Futrell, for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by Greene, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Moore County, for further proceedings not inconsistent with said dissenting opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
### §167. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §438(a)(1), June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 454

Section, act Aug. 20, 1912, ch. 308, §15, as added May 31, 1920, ch. 217, 41 Stat. 726; amended May 16, 1928, ch. 572, 45 Stat. 565; July 7, 1932, ch. 443, 47 Stat. 640; Mar. 26, 1934, ch. 89, 48 Stat. 486; Apr. 1, 1942, ch. 207, §§1, 4, 56 Stat. 190, 192; Pub. L. 88–60, §§1, 7, July 8, 1963, 77 Stat. 77, 78; Pub. L. 91–358, title I, §155(a), July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 570, related to rules and regulations to prevent dissemination of dangerous plant diseases and insect infections and infestations in the District of Columbia.
EXHIBIT 32.2
         Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
             U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, David A. O'Neil,
Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2005


                                       /s/David A. O'Neil
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David A. O'Neil
                                       Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer





                                       16