Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 36411 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(i) AMOCs approved previously in 

accordance with AD 2010–22–02, 

Amendment 39–16481 (75 FR 64636, October 

20, 2010), are approved as AMOCs for the 

corresponding provisions of this AD. 

(ii) AMOCs approved previously in 

accordance with AD 2011–23–08, 

Amendment 39–16859 (76 FR 71241, 

November 17, 2011), are approved as AMOCs 

for the corresponding provisions of this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(q) Related Information 

Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness 

Directive CF–2010–24, dated August 3, 2010, 

and the service bulletins specified in 

paragraphs (q)(1) through (q)(12) of this AD, 

for related information. 

(1) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 

A601R–29–029, Revision B, dated May 11, 

2010, including Appendix A, dated October 

18, 2007. 

(2) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 

A601R–29–031, Revision A, dated March 26, 

2009. 

(3) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 

A601R–32–103, Revision D, dated May 11, 

2010, including Appendix A, Revision A, 

dated October 18, 2007. 

(4) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–29– 

032, Revision A, dated January 26, 2010. 

(5) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–29– 

033, Revision A, dated May 11, 2010, 

including Appendix A, dated May 5, 2009. 

(6) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–29– 

035, dated May 11, 2010. 

(7) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–29– 

035, Revision A, dated December 8, 2010. 

(8) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–32– 

106, Revision A, including Appendix A, 

dated May 11, 2010. 

(9) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–32– 

107, Revision B, dated December 8, 2010. 

(10) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–32– 

107, Revision A, dated June 17, 2010. 

(11) Canadair Regional Jet Temporary 

Revision RJ/186–1, dated August 24, 2010, to 

the Canadair Regional Jet Airplane Flight 

Manual, CSP A–012. 

(12) Canadair Regional Jet TR RJ/186–2, 

dated July 7, 2011 to the Canadair Regional 

Jet Airplane Flight Manual, CSP A–012. 

(r) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(3) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on July 23, 2013. 

(i) Canadair Regional Jet TR RJ/186–2, 

dated July 7, 2011, to the Canadair Regional 

Jet Airplane Flight Manual, CSP A–012. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(4) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on December 22, 2011 (76 

FR 71241, November 17, 2011)). 

(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–29– 

035, Revision A, dated December 8, 2010. 

(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–32– 

107, Revision B, dated December 8, 2010. 

(5) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on November 4, 2010 (75 

FR 64636, October 20, 2010). 

(i) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 

A601R–29–029, Revision B, dated May 11, 

2010, including Appendix A, dated October 

18, 2007. 

Note 3 to paragraphs (r)(5)(i), (r)(5)(iii), 

(r)(5)(v), and (r)(5)(vii) of this AD: In 

Appendix A to these documents, the 

document number is shown only on page A1 

of these appendices. 

(ii) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 

A601R–29–031, Revision A, dated March 26, 

2009. 

(iii) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 

A601R–32–103, Revision D, dated May 11, 

2010, including Appendix A, Revision A, 

dated October 18, 2007. 

(iv) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–29– 

032, Revision A, dated January 26, 2010. 

(v) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–29– 

033, Revision A, dated May 11, 2010, 

including Appendix A, dated May 5, 2009. 

(vi) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R 29 

035, dated May 11, 2010. 

(vii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R– 

32–106, Revision A, including Appendix A, 

dated May 11, 2010. 

(viii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R– 

32–107, Revision A, dated June 17, 2010. 

(ix) Canadair Regional Jet Temporary 

Revision RJ/186–1, dated August 24, 2010, to 

the Canadair Regional Jet Airplane Flight 

Manual, CSP A–012. 

(6) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, 

Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– 

855–7401; email 

thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet http:// 

www.bombardier.com. 

(7) You may review copies of the service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(8) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http:// 

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

December 28, 2012. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–13524 Filed 6–17–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0158; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–ASO–5] 

Amendment of Class E Airspace; 

Tuskegee, AL 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E 

Airspace at Tuskegee, AL, as the 

Tuskegee VOR/DME has been 

decommissioned and airspace 

reconfiguration is necessary for the 

safety and airspace management of 

Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations 

at Moton Field Municipal Airport. This 

action also corrects the spelling of the 

airport. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, August 22, 

2013. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Fornito, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 

305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On March 28, 2013, the FAA 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

to amend Class E airspace at Moton 

Field Municipal Airport, Tuskegee, AL 

(78 FR 18928). Interested parties were 

invited to participate in this rulemaking 

effort by submitting written comments 

on the proposal to the FAA. No 

comments were received. Subsequent to 

publication the FAA found that the 

airport’s name was misspelled in the 

NPRM. This action corrects the 

misspelling from Moten to Moton. 

Except for editorial changes and the 

changes listed above, this rule is the 

same as published in the NPRM. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.9W dated August 8, 2012, 

and effective September 15, 2012, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

Part 71.1. The Class E airspace 

designations listed in this document 

will be published subsequently in the 

Order. 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
36412 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

The Rule 

This amendment to Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 

amends Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

within a 6.7-mile radius of Moton Field 

Municipal Airport, Tuskegee, AL, 

formerly called Tuskegee Municipal 

Airport. Airspace reconfiguration is 

necessary due to the decommissioning 

of the Tuskegee VOR/DME and 

cancellation of the VOR approach, and 

for the continued safety and 

management of IFR operations at the 

airport. Accordingly, the extension of 

Class E airspace to the northeast of the 

airport is eliminated. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it amends 

controlled airspace at Moton Field 

Municipal Airport, Tuskegee, AL. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ 

paragraph 311a. This airspace action is 

not expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (Air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9W, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 8, 2012, effective 

September 15, 2012, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward from 700 feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ASO TN E5 Tuskegee, AL [Amended] 

Moton Field Municipal Airport, AL 

(Lat. 32°27′38′′ N., long. 85°40′48′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile 

radius of Moton Field Municipal Airport. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on June 7, 

2013. 

Barry A. Knight, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2013–14150 Filed 6–17–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Chapter I 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0012] 

Notice of Policy Clarification for the 

Registration of Aircraft to U.S. Citizen 

Trustees in Situations Involving NonU.S. Citizen Trustors and Beneficiaries 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of FAA policy 

clarification. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the 

FAA’s clarification of its policy 

regarding the registration of aircraft to 

U.S. Citizen Trustees in situations 

involving non-U.S. citizen trustors and 

beneficiaries. 

DATES: Effective Date: The policy 

described herein is effective September 

16, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph Standell at 405–954–3296, Office 

of Aeronautical Center Counsel, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 6500 S. 

MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, 

Oklahoma 73169. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background 

The FAA has been reviewing policies 

and practices regarding the registration 

of aircraft in the United States involving 

U.S. citizen trustees and non-U.S. 

citizen trustors and beneficiaries. Such 

arrangements are commonly referred to 

as non-citizen trusts. The FAA began its 

review in part because of problems the 

FAA has experienced in obtaining 

important operational and maintenance 

information concerning such aircraft 

from the registered owners, i.e., the 

owner trustees. The problems in 

obtaining such information in turn 

affected the FAA’s ability to conduct 

fully effective oversight of such aircraft 

when operated outside the United 

States, and to provide foreign civil 

aviation authorities with information on 

those operations in support of the safety 

oversight activities of those authorities. 

The FAA also undertook the review of 

non-citizen trusts to assure compliance 

with the FAA regulatory requirements 

for non-citizen trusts contained in 14 

CFR 47.7. 

As part of its review of non-citizen 

trusts, the FAA published a notice of 

public meeting inviting members of the 

public to discuss the use of non-citizen 

trusts to register aircraft in the United 

States (76 FR 23353, April 26, 2011). In 

the notice, the FAA set forth several 

questions in order to elicit a robust 

discussion of the issues. Among other 

things, the FAA summarized the 

requirements in existing U.S. law that 

only an ‘‘owner’’ may register an 

aircraft, and that generally speaking 

only citizens of the United States that 

are owners are eligible to register 

aircraft. Thus, the FAA Aircraft Registry 

is an ‘‘owner’’ registry; it is not an 

‘‘operator’’ registry. 

The FAA met with interested 

members of the public on June 1, 2011, 

in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES