alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2204–4. Delegation of functions under other laws as unaffected

The provisions of section 2204–2 of this title shall not be deemed to prohibit the delegation, under authority of any other provision of law, of the whole or any part of any regulatory function or other function to any officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture.

(Apr. 4, 1940, ch. 75, §4, 54 Stat. 82.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 450f of this title prior to editorial reclassification as this section, and to section 516d of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
EXHIBIT 32.2

         Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
             U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),  I, David
O'Neil,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 13, 2009


                                       /s/David O'Neil
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David O'Neil
                                       Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer



                                       18
#### § 273.4 Policy.

It is DoD policy consistent with 41 CFR chapters 101 and 102 that excess DoD property must be screened and redistributed among the DoD Components, and reported as excess to the GSA. Pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 701, DoD will efficiently and economically dispose DoD FEPP.
§ 536.43 Incident to service. ( a ) A member of the armed forces' claim for personal injury or wrongful death arising incident to service is not payable under any subpart except to the extent permitted by the receiving State under §§ 536.114 through 536.116 (Claims arising overseas); however, a claim by a member of the United States Armed Forces for property loss or damage may be payable under AR 27-20, chapter 11 or, if not, under subparts C, E, F, or G of this part. Derivative claims and claims for indemnity are also excluded.
( b ) Claims for personal injury or wrongful death by members of a foreign military force participating in a joint military exercise or operation arising incident to service are not payable under any subpart. Claims for property loss or damage, but not subrogated claims, may be payable under subpart C of this part. Derivative claims and claims for indemnity or contribution are not payable under any subpart.
Note to § 536.43 :
For further discussion see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-37.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Deputy Chief Operating Officer

Office of Partner Participation and Oversight 

Federal Student Aid

I. DELEGATION

FROM: Chief Operating Officer

Federal Student Aid 

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority 

Under the authority vested in me through the Secretary by Delegation No. EA/EN/2, 

certified on November 18, 1998, pursuant to which I was delegated the 

administrative authority described in 34 C.F.R. Part 8 regarding demands issued to 

Departmental employees in Federal Student Aid for testimony and records in legal 

proceedings, as set forth in Delegation No. EA/GEN/varied2, certified on September 

4, 1992, I hereby redelegate to you, your successor in function, or anyone acting for 

you or delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of your position, 

the authority described in 34 C.F.R. Part 8 regarding demands issued to Departmental 

employees in Federal Student Aid for testimony or records in legal proceedings. This 

authority only applies to legal proceedings in which the United States is not a party. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the existing 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this redelegation. 

II. RESERVATION

III. REDELEGATION

The authority should be exercised in consultation with the Office of the General 

Counsel. 

No further redelegation is permitted.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This redelegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s 

Principal Delegations Control Officer.

Mark A. Brown (signed) 
OGC Clearance and Date: Signed by: Deborah Friendly/ 5/28/2020

Certification Date: 6/18/2020

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EN/ENA/90
### §1707. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title I, §107, 68 Stat. 457; Oct. 8, 1964, Pub. L. 88–638, §1(11), 78 Stat. 1036; Sept. 6, 1965, Pub. L. 89–171, pt. III, §401, 79 Stat. 662; Nov. 11, 1966, Pub. L. 89–808, §2(B), 80 Stat. 1532, relating to policy of encouraging overseas sales of commodities, was omitted in the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1512, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3633.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             853
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                       135
<INVENTORY>                                     14,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,631
<PP&E>                                          59,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,526
<BONDS>                                         19,000
<COMMON>                                           785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,134
<SALES>                                         24,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,420
<CGS>                                           19,701
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    443
<INCOME-TAX>                                       229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                214
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       214
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2011

y0620 

# Order

June 28, 2011

142700

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142700 COA: 301251 Oakland CC: 09-228012-FC; 09-228053-FC; 09-228298-FC LONNIE ONEAL SIMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: November 7, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2014-0110 M.T.I. TRAVEL, INC. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2013S0950011 Respondent
ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING On September 9, 2014 a Notice ofHearing Location was filed. OnNovember 5, 2014, the parties appeared for Hearing in CourtroomNo.4 at the U.S. District Court, District ofNewJersey, Newark, NewJersey. Atthe beginning ofthe courtreported Hearing, the parties statedthat they had settled the case. As a result, the FAA orally statedthat it was withdrawing its Complaint. Based onthe November 5, 2014 court-reported proceedings, the parties agreed that an Order ofDismissal could be immediately issued. After reviewing all relevant caselaw, decisions, regulations, statutory authority, andbeing fully advised; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the FAAhas withdrawn its Complaint. 2. This proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

Attachment: Service List IVan Ali'l:rr.rfiistrative LawJudgeSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC--430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1

Mr. Michael F. McKinley 

### Complainant's Counsel ONE COPY
Senior Attorney, Office ofthe ChiefCounsel,

**AGC~300** Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 TEL:

**202~267~**7100 FAX:

**202~267~5106**
Mr. David P. Affinito 

### Respondent's Counsel 101 Eisenhower Parkway Suite 300 Roseland, NJ 07068 TEL: 973-672-8000 FAX: 973-672-8215 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0110 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430.
### §2286. Termination of committees

The Secretary shall terminate any advisory committee upon a finding that any such advisory committee—

(1) has expended funds in excess of its estimated annual operating costs by more than 10 per centum or $500, whichever is greater, without the prior approval of the Secretary pursuant to the provisions of section 2285 of this title;

(2) has failed to file all reports required under the provisions of chapter 10 of title 5 or this chapter;

(3) has failed to meet for two consecutive years;

(4) is responsible for functions that otherwise would be or should be performed by Federal employees; or

(5) does not serve or has ceased to serve an essential public function.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XVIII, §1806, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1042; Pub. L. 97–98, title XI, §1116(a), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1271; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(30), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4308.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Par. (2). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 10 of title 5" for "the Federal Advisory Committee Act".

1981—Pub. L. 97–98 substituted provision relating to termination of advisory committees for provision relating to advisory committee charter requirements.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–98 effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4301 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1977, see section 1901 of Pub. L. 95–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 1307 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2




                      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Darren W. Karst, Chief Financial Officer of Roundy's, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
            ended January 1, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                    Dated: March 25, 2005



                                              /s/DARREN W. KARST
                                              ___________________________
                                              Executive Vice President
                                              and Chief Financial Officer
                                              Principal Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1. Delete paragraph 8.14 and substitute the following therefore:

All otherterms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and Order No. 8291 issued by the Commissioner acting under Chapter446c, Sections 22a-6, 22a-171, 22a-174, 22a-176, and 22a-177 ofthe Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect. Trading Agreement & OrderNo. 8291 Modification 1 ) ) ) ) 

# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Reporting: No later than March 1 ofevery year after issuance ofthis Trading Agreement and Order, the Respondent shall submit to the Commissionera written report containing copies ofall ofthe records required pursuant to Paragraph 8.12 ofthis Trading Agreement and Order. The Commissioner may prescribe the forms to be used for the submission of these reports. The Respondent shall submit these reports on such forms, ifprescribed by the Commissioner. Whereas, the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order 8291 issued on April 26, 2010, do now, by mutual agreement, modify said Trading Agreement and Order as follows: State ofConnecticut & Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street • Hartford. CT 06106-5127 www.cl.gov/dep An Equal Opportunity EmployerHamilton Sundstrand Corporation 2 Trading Agreement and Order No. 8291 Modification 1
Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice.

Titie:**--':l..Jj-l~-:===-----30_L.......:=.L--=--=:"=....1-_-L_----='** Date:


# ....

Issued as a modification ofan Order ofthe Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection

Gar . R , Director Engineering & Enforcement Division Bureau ofAir Management

TOWN OF WINDSOR LOCKS MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Certified Document No.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000032312
<NAME> EMCEE BROADCAST PRODUCTS, INC.

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          75,105
<SECURITIES>                                 1,585,704
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,417,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                    82,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,683,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,537,231
<PP&E>                                       3,047,990
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,316,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,670,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,887,830
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        73,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,138,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,670,219
<SALES>                                      1,680,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,680,609
<CGS>                                        1,339,912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,080,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (396,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (122,700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (274,155)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

TO: Principal Officers

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act (DEOA) (Public Law 96-88), 20 U.S.C. 3472, I hereby delegate to 

you for employees in your Principal Office the authority described in 34 C.F.R. Part 

8 regarding demands issued to Departmental employees for testifying or records in 

legal proceedings. This authority only applies to legal proceedings in which the 

United States is not a party.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

existing authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATION

The authority should be exercised in consultation with the Office of the General 

Counsel.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may be redelegated to Senior officials in your office who report 

directly to you. No other redelegation is permitted.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

authority.

_______/s/___________

 Richard W. Riley
Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 9/2/92

Certified Date: 9/4/92

Control No. EA/ES/42

Certified by: /s/ Wilma J. Hodo______________

 Departmental Delegations Control Officer

Addressees:

Principal Officers and List and PO Control No.

EA/EB/132 – Deputy Secretary

EA/EC/150 – Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

EA/EE/3 – Assistant Secretary for Policy and Planning

EA/EF/58 – Inspector General

EA/EG/54 – General Counsel

EA/EH/61 – Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

EA/EJ/22 - Assistant Secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs

EA/EK/75 - Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs

EA/EL/43 – Assistant Secretary for Management and Budget/CFO

EA/EM/180 – Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Administration

EA/EP/183 - Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

EA/ES/42 - Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

EA/ET/34 - Director, OBEMLA

EA/EV/40 - Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

EA/EI/2 – Chief Information Officer

EA/EN/2 – Chief Operating Officer, FSA

EA/EQ/2 – Deputy Under Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

EA/ER/1 – Director, Institute of Education Sciences

EA/EU/2 – Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
Exhibit 10.1


 


Fiscal 2006 Board of Directors
Compensation


 


All Non-Employee Directors-


 


1.             Cash:  a cash retainer of $15,000,
payable in equal installments of $7,500 in the third and fourth quarter of 2006;
and


 


2.             Equity:  a grant of stock options having a value (based upon
appropriate Black-Scholes option valuation methodology) equal to $35,000. The exercise
price for the options will be set on the date of grant and the option will vest
on December 31, 2006.


 


Committee Service-


 


1.             Cash:  for
each committee served, an additional cash retainer of $10,000, payable in equal
installments of $5,000 in the third and fourth quarter of 2006; and


 


2.             Equity:  for each committee served, an additional grant of stock
options having a value equal to $15,000, and having the same terms and
conditions as options granted to all non-employee Board members generally.


 


New Directors:  Directors
joining the Board in fiscal 2006 (Fred Davis will be considered a “new” Board
member for this purpose) will receive a one-time option grant having a value
equal to $25,000, a three-year vesting term and otherwise having the same terms
and conditions as options granted to all non-employee Board members generally.
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 00030001
- 00040002
- 00050000
- 00060000
- 00070000
- 00080000
- 00090003
- 00100004
- 00110005
- 00120006
- 00130007
- 00140008
- 001500bi
- 001600bc
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00088-CR

Matthew James Farrell, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. CR2015-006, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Matthew James Farrell seeks to appeal the district court’s order concluding that it 

lacked jurisdiction to grant Farrell’s requested judicial-clemency relief in his “Motion to Set 

Aside Conviction and Dismiss Charges.” See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42A.701(f). However, 

the clerk’s record does not contain the necessary standardized form that judges “must use” when 

discharging a defendant under article 42A.701. See id. art. 42A.701(f-1) (“A judge discharging a 

defendant under this article must use the form adopted under this subsection.”).1

 

1

 The Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System (OCA) adopted a 

standardized form for use after December 1, 2017, by courts discharging a defendant under 

article 42A.701. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42A.701(f-1); see also Off. Ct. Admin. Tex. 

Jud. Syst., “Order of Early Discharge From Community Supervision (Probation) under Article 

42A.701, CCP,” available at http://www.txcourts.gov/rules-forms/forms/. The form is posted in 

Word format on OCA’s website. See “Order of Early Discharge from Community Supervision 
2

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the district court for 

completion of the standardized form required by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See id. 

A supplemental clerk’s record containing the completed form shall be filed with this Court no 

later than May 6, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(3).

It is ordered April 5, 2019.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Abated and Remanded

Filed: April 5, 2019

Do Not Publish

 

(Probation),” available at https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1439810/discharge-order-earlytermination.docx.
#### § 770.55 Responsibility.

The responsibility for proper identification and control of personnel and vehicle movement on the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard is vested with the Shipyard Security Manager (Code 1700).

[49 FR 34003, Aug. 28, 1984, as amended at 65 FR 53593, Sept. 5, 2000]