p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1669 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number:

Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/23/2008 9:36:49 AM Sheet 71 of 110P. 2

0 TO :

FROM : DATE : 

### A 9 8 

### 1 3 MEMORANDU M Stev e Shed

d U.S . EPA/OAQPS/ESD/WCP G ES D Projec t

No . 96/0 5 

# r:: :

i i

•:;> A •',!'• . POf'Kl-' r Bern d Hanek

e an d Gre g LaFla

m Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) Februar y 3,199 8 SUBJECT : Firs t

Roundtabl e Meetin g o n th e P-MAC T fo r Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (Non-Gasoline ) Facilitie s I . Purpos e The purpos e ofthi s meetin g wa s to brin g together th e projec t

Wor k Team , includin g th e EP A an d it s contractor , t o discus s information an d issue s pertinent t o th e developmen

t of presumptiv e MAC T (P-MACT ) fo r organi c liquid s distributio n facilities . Thi s wor k i s in suppor

t ofth e developmen

t o f nationa l emissio n standard s fo

r hazardou s air

pollutant s (NESHAP ) fo

r th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) sourc e category . H . Locatio n an d Date U.S . Environmenta

l Protectio n Agency Environmenta

l Researc h Cente

r Building , Classroo mNo . 2 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 Januar y 21,1998 , 9:00 a

mt o noo n in . Participant s Bil l Beck , Mobi l Corporatio n Ted Cromwell , Chemica

l Manufacturer s Associatio n John Dege , Dupont Joel Fazzio , Internationa

l Mate x Tan k Terminal s Jo e Federowicz , EMC O Wheato n DTM , Inc . Bem d Haneke , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Clif f Harvison , Nationa

l Tan k Truc k Carrier s Ja y Helms , PE S Greg LaFlam , PE S Denis e Michelson , ARC O Pip e Lin e Compan y Norma n Morrow , Exxo n Chemica l America sP. 3

Mem o - 1st Roundtabl e Summar

y Februar y 3,199 8 Pag e 2 Bria

n Neville , Independen

t Liqui d Terminal s Associatio n Rober t Norton , PE S Kari n Ritter , America

n PetroleumInstitut

e Stev e Shedd , U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency John Stock , EMC O Wheaton DTM , Inc . Gar y Wilson , Maratho n Oil Compan y IV . Discussio n EP A Introductio n Afte r th e participant s introduce d themselves , Stev e Shed d bega n th e discussio n b y emphasizin g tha

t thi s meetin g woul d b e hel d in th e for mo f a n open discussion , and wa s no t goin g t o b e merel

y apresentatio n by th e EP

A o r PES . Greg LaFla

mreferre d to ahandout

o f preliminar y P-MACT informatio n an d issue s distribute d befor

e th e meetin g (Enclosur

e 1) , an d state d tha t th e meeting woul d follow th e structur e ofth e handout . He sai d tha t th e followin g ke

y topi c area s woul d b e presented , and question s o r discussio n woul d b e welcom e a t an y time . Standard s Developmen

t Proces s Affected Source s Emission s an

d Control s Issues/Question s Nex t Step s Fromthi s point , Mr . LaFla

mproceede d by beginning adiscussio n ofth e standard s developmen t process . Standard s Developmen

t Proces s Mr . LaFla maddresse d th e fac

t tha t presumptiv e maximu

machievabl e contro l technolog y (P-MACT ) i s ashort-ter

mjudgment

o f wha t th e "MACT floor " of

contro l shoul d be , and provide s abasi s fro

mwhich th e NESHA

P wil l b e developed . H

e furthe r emphasize d tha

t P-MAC T i s no t

aregulation , but

i s offere d a s guidanc e and informatio n t o entitie s makin g case-by-cas e MAC

T decisions . Mr . LaFla man d Mr . Shed

d presente d abrief

discussio n of

statutor y requirements , which include d definition s of

severa l ke y terms . Following thi s discussion , Clif f Harviso n state d tha

t uniformit y o f truc k loadin g equipmen

t wa s neede d between th e States . He pointe d out that , fo r example , atan

k truck fro mTexa s would hav e to b e abl e to unloa d i n Michigan , an

d b e abl e t o us e th e sam

e equipmen

t nationwide . H

e pointe d ou

t tha t facilitie s wit

h differen t hardwar e coul d becom e anightmar

e fo r truc k operators . Mr . Shed

d replie d tha

t th e industr

y wa s bes t suite d toP. 4

Mem o - 1st Roundtabl e Summar

y Februar y 3,199 8 Pag e 3 wor k out th e detail s o f

wha t hardwar e woul d b e neede d to mak

e tan k truck s compatibl e wit

h regulate d facilities , bu t

tha t th e EP A woul d addres s th e issu e if i t becam e necessary . Th e projec t

schedul e wa s addresse d nex t b y Mr . LaFlam , who pointe d out tha t there wa s apotentia l fo r tw o mor e roundtabl e meetings . Bil l Bec k asked wha

t th e schedul e fo

r th e EPA' s planne d industr

y survey wa s goin g to be . Mr . Shed d responde d tha

t th e surve y wil l mos t

likely b e sen t out t o alimite d numbe

r of facilitie s in March , but

th e result s wil l no t

b e abl e to b e tabulate d befor

e June/Jul y 1998 . Norma

n Morro w pointe d ou

t tha t th e complexit

y ofth e draf

t surve y indicate s tha

t i t wil l requir

e i n exces s of

60 day s fo

r facilitie s t o complet

e aresponse . Mr . Shed d pointe d out

tha t th e result s ofth e surve

y wil l likely no t

b e full y analyze d i n time fo

r incorporatio n into th e P-MACT decision . Bria n Nevill e asked whethe

r P-MAC T woul d hav e a forma l commen t period , t o which Mr . Shed

d responde d tha

t the draf t P-MAC T documen

t wil l b e a n expande d versio n ofth e preliminar y P-MACT informatio n being discusse d a t thi s meeting , an d wil l b e availabl e fo

r review befor

e i t i s finalized . Also , P-MAC T wil l b e poste d on th e EPA' s Technolog y Transfe r Networ k (TTN) bulleti n boar

d wher e i t wil l b e availabl e t o an

y intereste d party . Affected Source s Mr . LaFla mintroduce d thi s topi c by pointin g out tha t the initia l sourc e categor

y descriptio n i s stil l quit

e general , and additiona

l wor k wil l b e require d t

o narro w i t

down . He sai d tha t include d i n thi s sourc e categor y woul d b e activitie s associate d wit h th e storag e and distributio n o f

organi c HA

P liquid s othe

r tha n gasoline , a

t site s tha t serv e a s distributio n point s fromwhic h organi c liquid s ma y b e obtaine d fo

r furthe r us e an d processing . For

oi l an d ga s production , th e categor

y will include onl

y petroleumfacilitie s tha

t handl e and distribute hydrocarbo n liquid s afte

r th e point o f custod y transfer . Mr . LaFla

mals o state d tha

t th e EP A an d PE S will b e lookin g a

t certai n petroleumand crude oil storag e an d transmissio n facilitie s a s potentia l source s fo

r regulation . Th e issu e ofth e exten

t of coverag e ofth e standard s was raised . John Deg e suggeste d tha t th e sourc e categor

y shoul d onl

y include source s no t

alread y covered , or

du e t o b e covered , by othe r MAC T rules . Mr . Morrow asked if th e sourc e categor

y would b e limite d to independen t facilities , or

i f i t woul d g o beyond that . Mr . Shed d replie d tha

t collocate d distributio n facilitie s woul d als o b e evaluated . H e state d tha

t th e othe r MACT rule s cannot

simpl y b e liste d a s area s fo r exclusion ; specifi c languag e need s t o b e include d t

o defin e the coverag e o f

eac h rule . Mr . Deg e agree d tha

t th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n NESHA P woul d requir e languag e tha

t take s int o accoun t other NESHAP . 

# 3P. 5

Mem o - 1st Roundtabl e Summar

y Februar y 3,199 8 Pag e 4 Mr . LaFla

mbriefl y discusse d th

e type s o f facilitie s tha

t migh t b e include d i n thi s sourc e category . Thes e included : 1 . Pipelin e facilitie s 2 . Stand-alone terminal s 3 . Collocate d terminal s 4 . Compounding/packagin g facilities . Mr . Deg e aske d ho w pipelin e facilitie s woul d b e covered , mentionin g tha t on e part y ma y ow n apipelin e tha

t i s operate d by anothe

r party . H e fel t tha t th e ter m"owne r o r operator " wa s usefu l in coverin g thes e cases . He als o asked i f pipeline s tha

t connec t loca l facilitie s woul d b e addressed . Mr . Deg e gav e a n example o

f a n 8-mil e pipelin e connectin g amanufacturin g facilit y t o aterminal , askin g i f

apipelin e ofthi s natur

e would b e covered . Mr . Morro w expresse d agreemen t tha t th e issu e of

pipeline s would hav e t

o b e clarified . Mr . Shed

d note d tha

t th e EPA/PE S tea

mfo r thi s projec t

i s jus t learnin g about

th e pipelin e industry , and the y wil l b e conductin g adetaile d revie w of pipelin e operation s a s th e projec t proceeds . Mr . Deg e commente d tha

t the terminolog y "stand-alon e terminal " migh t no t b e adequate to cove r th e independen

t distributio n facilities . He mentione d tha t variou s scenario s o f ownershi p and operatio n ar

e possible , which preclude d th e us e ofth e phras e "stand-alone. " He suggeste d tha

t th e proper

terminolog y migh

t b e "separat

e owner/operator

facilities. " Mr . LaFla mstate d tha

t th e EP A ha s ver y littl e informatio n about

collocate d distributio n facilitie s and ho w they interac t wit h thei r producing facilit

y (refinerie s o

r chemica l plants) . Furthe r informatio n i s needed , and i t i s hoped tha

t the Wor k Tea mca n hel p provide thi s information . Mr . Harviso n note d tha

t agoo d organizatio n t

o contac t fo r compounding/packagin g plant s woul d b e th e Nationa l Associatio n of

Chemica l Distributor s (NACD) , base d in Washingto n D.C . He furthe r note d tha t th e NACD i s involve d wit

h small packagin g operations , an d ha s regional/loca

l distribution . A roundtabl e participan t asked if th e packagin g o f

smal l bottle s woul d b e covere d by thi s NESHAP , an d i f ther e woul d b e asiz e cutoff

. Mr . Shed

d responde d tha

t thi s ha d no t yet bee n determined . Mr . Deg e aske d ho w genera l an d hazardou s wast

e wa s goin g t o b e addressed , a s muc h o f thi s i s covere d b y th e Resourc e Conservatio n an d Recover y Ac t (RCRA) . Mr . Shed

d answere d tha t thi s ha d no t yet been looke d at , bu

t thi s MAC T rul e woul d no t

attemp t to cove r th e operation s addresse d unde

r RCRA . Mr . Morro w mentione d tha t the draf t industr y surve y i s to o broa

d an d i s not clea r enoug h t o provide concise , usefu

l answers . H

e state d tha

t the draf t surve y a s currently constructe d woul d 

# HP. 6

Mem o - 1s t Roundtabl e Summar

y Februar y 3,199 8 Pag e 5 collec t dat afromever

y manufacturin g facilit

y withi n th e Unite d States . O n simila r lines , Mr . Deg e mentione d tha

t fo r ever y questio n aske d abou

t pipelines , a

t leas t 1 4 additiona

l question s woul d surface . Mr . LaFla mnext addresse d th e "Organi c Liquid s Distributio n Facilitie s Industry, " notin g tha t th e include d industr

y diagra m(pag e 1 1 in Enclosur

e I ) wa s create d t o provide amenta l imag e ofth e industry . He als o state d tha t th e diagra mwoul d nee d t o b e refined a s mor e i s learne d about

th e sourc e category . Th e industr

y profil e tabl e base d o n SIC code s wa s briefl y discussed . N o specifi c discussio n wa s brough

t abou t by th e SI C cod e listin g o f pipelin e and stand-alon e terminals . Denis e Michelso n note d tha t SIC Cod e 1 3 (Oi l an

d Gas Extraction ) applie s t o petroleum product s befor

e th e point o f custod y transfer , which ar

e exclude d fromth e OL

D sourc e category . Upo n discussin g th e compoundin g an d packagin g facilities , Mr . Deg e aske d i f pharmaceutica

l bottlin g woul d b e covered . Hi s opinio n wa s tha t th e Pharmaceutical s MAC T rul e woul d likely cove r thi s typ e o

f operation . Mr . Shed d mentione d tha

t th e EP A require s informatio n regardin g rai l transportatio n o f organi c liquids . Mr . Harviso n note d tha t th e tw o primar

y trad e organization s fo

r thi s ar e th e Associatio n or

America n Railroad s (AAR

) an d th e Railwa

y Progres s Institute (RPI) . He furthe r note d tha t railcar s ar e owned b y th e shippe

r an d hav e dedicate d service . Also , railcar s wil l haul a limite d numbe

r o f chemical s ofth e sam

e famil y on a n averag e o f

6- 7 round trips/year . On th e othe r hand , tan k truck s wil l d

o up t o 3 round trip s awee k an d carr y avariet y of chemical s i n th e sam e deliver y tank . Mr . LaFla mbriefl y discusse d th e processe s an d equipmen

t tha t migh t b e covere d b y th e NESHAP ; among thes e ar

e storag e tanks , liqui d transfer s o f truck , railcar , pipeline , marin e vessel , equipmen

t leaks , an d wastewate

r collectio n an

d treatment . Mr . Beck

state d tha t he thought th e definitio n o

f "organi c liquid " i n thi s rul e shoul d b e limite d b y vapo r pressure . H e furthe r state d tha t th e surve y shoul d limit

th e datareques t

fo r liquid s by avapo

r pressur e cutoff . Th e issu e o f

are aversu s majo

r sourc e determinatio n wa s brough t u p an d Mr . Shed

d responde d tha t a n are asourc e determinatio n (fo r healt h or environmenta

l impact) neede d t

o b e mad e befor e are asource s coul d b e eliminate d fromconsideration . Regardin g which liquid s shoul d b e covered , Mr . LaFla mliste d syntheti c organi c HA P chemicals , petrochemicals , crude oi l or othe r unrefined petroleumliquids , refined petroleum (non-gasoline) , an

d othe r pur e liquid s o r mixture s wit

h HA P content . Mr . Bec

k mentione d tha

t th e §112(k

) Urba n Ai r Toxic s stud

y shoul d b e reviewed to se

e wha t wa s considered . Regardin g th e tabl e ofth e "To p 2 0 Organi c HA P Chemical s by Volum

e (1993-96), " th e EP A pointe d out

tha t informatio n i s require d o n th e unit s of thes e chemicals , a s well a s a 

# 5P. 7

Mem o - 1s t Roundtabl e Summar

y Februar y 3 , 199 8 Pag e 6 determinatio n ofth e majo

r chemical s tha

t shoul d b e addressed . Mr . Morro w mentione d tha t mixture s shoul d b e addresse d i n thi s table . Mr . LaFla mdescribe d th e model industr y profile , base d o n th e Independen t Liqui d Termina l Association' s (ILTA

) 1997 directory . He sai d tha t no model industr

y profil e ha

d bee n develope d fo

r pipeline , collocated , or

compounding an

d packagin g facilitie s du e t o alac k o f information . Mr . Harviso n state d tha t agoo d sourc e o f

infonnatio n fo

r pipeline s wa s th e America n Petroleu mInstitut

e (API ) an d th e Departmen

t o f Transportation' s (DOT ) Office o f Pipelin e Safet

y (Ric h Felder , contact

) withi n th e DOT' s Research an d Specia l Program s Administratio n (RS P A) . Mr . Harviso n named A l Robert s (Associat

e Administrato r

o f RS P A ) a s aspecifi c contac t

within . Emission s an

d Control s Mr . LaFla mbriefl y stated tha

t emission s calculation s utilizin g parameter s such a s volume , loadin g method , an d vapo r pressur e wer e going to b e mad

e fo r model plant s i n th e sourc e category . Th e HA

P conten t o f organi c liquid s woul d als o nee d to b e know n t o quantif y emissions . Source s o f information fo

r th e incomplet

e tabl e title d "Organi c Liquid s wit h Partia l HA P Content " wer

e requeste d b

y Mr . Shed

d an d Mr . LaFlam . Mr . Morro w sai d tha t DO T track s these , upo n whic h Mr . Harviso n responde d tha t thi s wa s n o longe

r th e case . Producer s no w ar e holdin g thi s typ e o f

data . Mr . Bec k questione d wh

y gasoline wa s include d in th e table , to whic h Mr . Shed d answere d tha

t i t wa s purel y fo r purpose s o f

comparison . Mr . Shed

d state d tha

t th e HA P content i s th e rea l issu e in decidin g o

n emissio n potential , to which Mr . Deg e aske d wha t vapor pressure cutof f woul d b e appropriate . Mr . Bec k adde d tha t ther e should b e aHA

P content limi t o n th e liquid s include d fo

r coverage . Mr . Morro w agreed wit h this , emphasizin g tha

t man y organi c liqui d stream s contai n HA

P i n minut e quantitie s (< 1 ppm

) an d tha t ther e i s n o valu e in collectin g thi s information . Mr . Shed d responded tha

t th e EP A an d PE S woul d requir

e goo d boundarie s fromth e industry , an

d tha t the surve y ma y b e modified t

o addres s thes e values . On e participant

questione d the inclusio n o f wastewate

r in th e table , sinc e off-sit

e wastewate r i s alread y covered b

y aseparat e NESHAP . Mr . Shed

d responde d tha

t off-sit e operation s woul d no t

b e considered fo

r coverag e by th e OL

D rule . Mr . LaFla mthe n describe d th e model s an d method s tha

t wil l b e utilize d to calculate emission s fromfacilities . Amon g thes e ar e AP-42 , th e TANKS3. 1 program , th e WATER 8 progra mfo r estimatin g emission s fromwastewater , and variou s othe r publication s includin g "Fugitiv e Emissio n Factor s fo r Crud e Oil an d Produc t Pipelin e Facilities, " by API . Kari n Ritter <oP. 8

Mem o - 1s t Roundtabl e Summar

y Februar y 3 , 199 8 Pag e 7 mentione d tha

t AP I i s developin g it s ow

n wastewate

r emission s modelin g softwar e a s a n alternativ e to WATER8 . Sh e furthermor

e aske d i f atabl e wa s bein g worked out showin g Stat

e and Federa

l regulation s pertainin g to th e P-MACT . Mr . Shed

d responde d tha

t suc h asummar

y i s bein g develope d b y PES . Example s o f

contro l technique s fo

r storag e tanks , liqui d transfer/loading , equipment leak s an d wastewate

r were the n describe d by Mr . LaFlam . Mr . Morro w aske d i f covere d liquid s woul d include liquefie d natura

l gases . Mr . Shed

d replie d tha

t thes e liquid s ar

e intende d t o b e covered . Mr . Morro w sai d tha

t pressure vessel s an

d specifi c transfe

r method s fo

r suc h liquid s woul d nee d t o b e recognized . Joe l Fazzi o the n stated tha t i t woul d no t b e feasibl e to rout

e vapor s fromNo . 2 an d No . 6 fue

l oi l operation s t o contro l device s becaus e of their lo w vapo r pressures . Mr . Bec

k the n reiterate d th e nee d fo

r vapor pressur e cutoff s to eliminat

e suc h lo w vapor

pressure liquids . A discussio n commence d regarding th e curren t contro l level s on th e Federa l level . Mr . Bec k mentione d tha

t th e listin g i n th e EPA' s presentatio n di d not reflect curren t contro l level s a s som e ofth e rule s hav e no t

bee n promulgated . Th e rule s not promulgate d include d th e Miscellaneou s Organi c NESHAP (MON) , th e Storag e Vessel NESHA P (subpar t WW) , an d th e Oil-Wate r Separator NESHAP (subpar

t VV) . I t wa s als o mentione d tha

t no t al l applicabl e rule s ha d been listed ; amon g thes e wer e the Off-Sit

e Wastewate

r NESHAP , th e 112(k

) Urba n Ai r Toxic s Rule , th e Benzen e Wastewate r Storag e and Transfe

r NESHAP , an

d th e Consumer/Commercia

l Product s NESHAP . Futur e facility/plant

visit s wer e als o discussed . Mr . Morro w aske d wha t facilitie s th e EP A ha d visited , upo n whic h h e wa s informe d tha t tw o facilitie s i n New Jersey an d on e in Philadelphi aha

d been surveye d by the EPA/PE S team . A discussio n ofth e survey prompted Mr . Bec k to stat e tha t i n hi s opinio n aseparat

e roundtabl e discussio n i s require d to preven t th e surve y frombein g useles s a s adatagatherin g tool . Mr . Shed

d the n requeste d acommitmen t by th e grou

p to revie w th e ICR , and to develo p question s an

d comment s fo

r revisin g the document . He furthe r requeste d tha

t comment s and question s b e prepare d b y early February , s o tha t ameeting coul d b e organized . Ms . Ritter suggeste d th e wee

k of Februar y 9th , an d Februar y 12t h wa s tentatively selecte d a s th e meetin g date . On e technica l questio n brough

t u p durin g th e roundtabl e regardin g th e surve y consiste d of Mr . Morro w askin g ho w to addres s tank s tha t frequently chang e service . He cite d th e exampl e tha t som e tank s ma y hol d ahig h vapo

r pressur e liqui d fo r onl y 1 wee k ou t ofth e year . Mr . Shed d responde d tha

t thi s issu e would be addresse d during wor k o n th e IC R survey . He the n aske d if an y participant

wa s awar e o f curren t studie s bein g performed o n emission s fromthes e type s o f operations . N o mentio n o f an y current studie s was made . 

# nP. 9

Mem o - 1s t Roundtabl e Summar

y Februar y 3,199 8 Pag e 8 A discussio n the n ensue d regardin g the portio n ofth e P-MAC T coverin g Stat e an d loca l rules . Mr . LaFla

msuggested , and Mr . Deg e agreed , tha t th e rul e summarie s presente d her e migh t b e misinterpreted . Mr . Morro w mentioned tha t th e rule s ha

d been tabulate d before . Ms . Michelso n inquire d about

rule s coverin g equipmen

t leaks , t o whic h Shed

d responde d that

PE S woul d b e reviewin g thi s typ e of information . Mr . Deg e state d tha

t h e woul d neve

r agre e wit h SOCMI dat aand emissio n factors . Ms . Ritter remarke d tha

t API ma y hav e information regardin g emission s fromtransfe r facilitie s an d operations . Mr . Shed

d state d tha

t he woul d shar

e information regardin g Stat e rule s an d regulation s wit

h th e industr

y in February . Issue s an d Question s Mr . Shed d inquire d a s to th e impac t

o f standard s dealin g wit

h othe r medi a(i.e. , water , soli d waste ) on th e P-MACT process . Mr . Bec k propose d tha

t th e EP A an d PES prepar

e alis t of organi c liqui d limitation s an d exclusion s base d upo n th e following criteria : 1 . Vapo

r Pressur e cutoff s 2 . HA

P percentag e cutoff

s 3 . Othe

r rule s tha t ma y overla p o r impac t th e OL D NESHA

P 4 . Loadin g of

pressurize d liquids . Mr . Bec k suggeste d tha

t thi s lis t b e use d t o limi t th e industr

y survey . Ther

e wa s som e discussio n o n th e issu e ofth e surve

y bein g to o larg e an

d that , i f lef t a s is , i t coul d produc e exces s informatio n tha

t would no t

b e useful . Next'Step s Nex t step s in th e P-MACT proces s as discusse d durin g th e meetin g include d holdin g a meetin g to discus s th e industr y survey , finalizing an

d mailin g ofth e survey , an d plannin g futur

e sit e visits . Furthe

r developmen

t ofth e draf

t P-MAC T wa s als o addressed , a

t which time Mr . Deg e mentione d tha

t he though t i t wa s awast

e of time , money , energy , an

d taxpayers ' dollars . Mr . Beck replie d tha

t thi s migh t b e th e cas e fo

r thos e no t understandin g th e tru e natur e ofth e P

MACT process . Ted Cromwel l state d tha

t h e though t th e roundtabl e meeting s should b e longe r s o a s t o cove r mor e information . M

r Shed d mentione d tha

t th e minute s ofth e roundtabl e woul d b e poste d on th e EPA' s TT N bulleti n board . V . Pertinen t

Issue s Durin g th e meeting , variou s issue s regarding th e industr y surve y and th e entir

e OL D NESHA P developmen

t wer e raise d tha

t th e EP A consider s t o b e importan t and believe s nee d t o

%P.1 0

Mem o - 1s t Roundtabl e Summar

y Februar y 3,199 8 Pag e 9 b e investigate d and discusse d furthe r b y th e Wor

k Team . Thes e principa

l issue s ar e summarize d below : IC R Issue s 1 . Defin

e th e specifi c facilitie s tha

t nee d t o repor

t data . 2 . Ar e separat e survey s needed fo

r differen t type s o f facilitie s (industr

y subcategories) ? 3 . Shoul d limitation s b e place d on th e liquid s to b e reporte d (i.e. , vapor pressure or

HA P content cutoffs) ? 4 . Conside

r acutof f o f tota l facilit y emission s (i.e. , <5 0 percen t of majo r sourc e levels) . Thus , smalle

r facilitie s woul d no t

hav e to respond . 5 . Ca n th e surve

y b e simplified b y allowin g respondent s t o grou p dat ao r provide summarie s o f certai n information ? 6 . Ho w shoul d afacilit y repor t o n tank s tha

t hav e variabl e storage ; fo

r example , storin g a particula r HA P liqui d fo r aver y shor t tim e durin g th e year ? OL D NESHA

P Issue s 1 . Ho w shoul d th e sourc e categor y b e defined (i.e. , which facilitie s shoul d b e covered) ? 2 . Issue s regardin g hazardou s wast e and liquid s controlle d by RCRA . 3 . Loca

l pipeline s an

d their inclusio n i n th e OL

D rule . 4 . Defin

e term s such a s "stand-alone, " "collocated, " "pipeline, " etc . 5 . Wil l are asource s b e covered by thi s NESHAP ? 6 . Ho w man

y facilitie s ar

e small businesses ? 7 . Develop a

n understandin g o

f State/Federa

l rule s tha t alread y regulat e sector s ofth e liqui d distributio n industry . 8 . Loadin g o f

liquefie d natura

l gases/LP G i s mostly exclude d fromother rules ; wil l i t

b e th e sam e here ? 9 . Simila

r source s covered b y othe

r MAC T rule s need to b e addresse d and clarified . Identificatio n o f

an y unregulate d emissio n source s within thos e MACT categorie s mus t b e made , alon g wit

h adecisio n on possibl e coverag e b y th e OL D rule . 10 . Impact s o f

standard s dealing wit

h othe r medi aon th e OL

D NESHAP . 11 . Ar e compounding/packagin g operation s aseparat e typ e o f facilit y tha t need s t o b e understoo d an d regulated ? Ifso , they nee d t o b e defined , emission s estimated , etc .



## T