alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1421a. Financial impact study

#### (a) Study

The Secretary of Agriculture shall conduct an annual study of the financial impact of the support levels established and announced by the Secretary under programs contained in the Agricultural Act of 1949 [7 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.] (hereafter in this section referred to as "programs"), including a study of the effect of the support levels on the ability of producers to meet their financial obligations (with special emphasis on borrowers from the Farmers Home Administration and the Farm Credit System).

#### (b) Report

The Secretary shall annually prepare a report containing the results of the study and submit the report to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate, not later than the date of the final announcement for the programs by the Secretary for any 1 year.

#### (c) Informational purposes

The study under this section (including the study of the effect of the support levels on the ability of producers to meet their financial obligations) shall be only for informational purposes and for Congressional oversight and shall not give rise to any cause of action, be a basis for, or be used as evidence in support of, any claim or right of any person, including farmers and borrowers, in any administrative or judicial proceeding.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XI, §1147, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Agricultural Act of 1949, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, 63 Stat. 1051, which is classified principally to this chapter (§1421 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, and not as part of the Agricultural Act of 1949 which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of the 1949 Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective beginning with 1991 crop of an agricultural commodity, with provision for prior crops, see section 1171 of Pub. L. 101–624, set out as a note under section 1421 of this title.
## MEMORANDUM

TO: Public Record for the Effluent Gu idelines and Standards for the Airport Deicing Category - EPA Docket Number EPA-HQ-OW-2004-0038 (www.regulations.gov)

FROM: Eric Strassler, USEPA/OW/OST/EAD,

Mail Code 4303T Ph: (202) 566-1026, HQ strassler.eric@epa.gov

DATE: 08 February 2012

SUBJECT: Attachments of Articles pertai ning to Anaerobic fluidized bed reactor - DCN AD01264

Below are various articles pertaining to Anaerobic Fluidized bed reactor to support the Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Airport Deicing Category:

AD01264A1 Response of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor treating ice-cream wastewater to organic, hydraulic, temperature and pH shocks - DCN AD01264A1

AD01264A2 Performance evaluation of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor with natural zeolite as support material when treat ing high-strength dist illery wastewater - DCN AD012064A2

AD01264A3 Anerobic Digestion Of Wine Distillery Wastewater In Down-Flow Fluidized Bed - DCN AD01264A3

AD01264A4 Treatment of textile wastewater with an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor - DCN AD01264A4

AD01264A5 Review on the Application of Anaerobic Fluidized Bed Reactors in Waste-water Treatment - DCN AD01264A5

AD01264A6 Evaluation of inverse anaerobic fluidi zed bed reactor for treating high strength organic wastewater - DCN AD01264A6

AD01264A7 Fluidized Bed Anaerobic Biodegra dation of Food Industry Wastewaters - DCN AD01264A7
#### In the Matter of the Claim of George Taylor, Appellant, against Manhattan Storage & Warehouse, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs, unless appellant perfects appeal, files note of issue, and files and serves record and brief on or before August 15,1960 and is ready for argument at the September Term of this court, in which event the motion is denied. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.91 Filing a claim. ( a ) *Elements of a proper claim.* A claim is must be filed on a Standard Form 95 or other written document. It must be signed by the Claimant or authorized agent, be for money damages in a sum certain, and lay out a basic statement as to the nature of the claim that will allow the Air Force to investigate the allegations contained therein.
( b ) *Amending a claim.* A claimant may amend a claim at any time prior to final action. To amend a claim the claimant or his or her authorized agent must submit a written, signed demand.
[81 FR 83697, Nov. 22, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                       958
<INVENTORY>                                     47,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,119
<PP&E>                                         295,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,395
<BONDS>                                        105,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,988
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   339,010
<SALES>                                         86,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,201
<CGS>                                           66,419
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,894
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,944
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,944
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
VICTOR ROME

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5113

____________ _________________/

Opinion filed February 10, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Terry D. Terrell , Judge

.

Victor Rome , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney

G eneral, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 716.6 Coal mines in Alaska. ( a ) Permittees of surface coal mining operations in Alaska from which coal has been mined on or after August 3, 1977, shall conduct operations in a manner that, at a minimum, meets the performance standards of this chapter.
( b ) The Secretary, after consultation with the Governor of Alaska, may modify the applicability of any environmental protection standard to any surface coal mining operation if he determines that it is necessary to ensure the continued operation of the mine.
( c ) Any person may petition the Secretary to modify the applicability of a performance standard to a coal mine in Alaska. No particular form of petition is required. However, the petition shall be in writing and shall identify clearly— ( 1 ) The performance standard involved;
( 2 ) The alternative methods to be used to protect the environment and public health and safety;
( 3 ) The reasons why a modification is requested with full descriptions of the impacts continued requirements for compliance with the performance standard to be modified would have on mining and reclamation and of the impacts the proposed method would have on the environment and public health and safety; and
( 4 ) The location of the mine.
( d ) If the Secretary determines that the petition presents reasonable justification for modifying the performance standard, he may grant a temporary suspension of enforcement of the performance standard, and he shall publish a notice of intention to modify the applicability of the performance standard in the Federal Register and in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of Alaska where the affected coal mine is located. A public hearing shall be held in Alaska and any person may testify for or against the proposed modification. The Secretary, after considering the public comments, and consulting with the Governor of Alaska, shall publish his decision in the Federal Register and in the same newspaper in which the original notice was published.
#### ROBERTSON v. ROBERTSON

No. 295P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 298

Petition by respondents (Marion Robertson et al) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 September 1997.
### §2255. Membership in International Wheat Advisory Committee, International Sugar Council, etc.

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to expend funds, available for agricultural conservation, adjustment, and land use programs, for the share of the United States as a member of the International Wheat Advisory Committee, the International Sugar Council, or like events or bodies concerned with the objectives of said program, together with traveling and other necessary expenses relating thereto: Provided, That expenditures under this authority shall not be made unless provision is made therefor in the applicable appropriation and the cost thereof is not in excess of limitations prescribed therein.

(Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title VII, §701(a), 58 Stat. 741.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section was enacted as part of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944.

Section was formerly classified to sections 570 and 574 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Dated May 12, 2006



Commission File Number: 001-14666



MITTAL STEEL COMPANY N.V.

(Translation of registrants name into English)



15th Floor, Hofplein 20

3032 AC Rotterdam

The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-FxForm 40-Fo



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



YesoNox



If Yes marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________





















---









At its May 12, 2006 Press Conference, Mittal Steel Company N.V. made the presentation attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1



Exhibit List



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                         | 
|------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Mittal Steel Company N.V.s presentation entitled 2006 First Quarter Results, dated May 12, 2006.























| | 2 | 
| | - | 





---









SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: May 12, 2006



| | By: | /s/Henk Scheffer
| | --- | ----------------
| |     | Name:           
| |     | Title:          















| | 3 | 
| | - | 





---













Exhibit Index



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                         | 
|------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Mittal Steel Company N.V.s presentation entitled 2006 First Quarter Results, dated May 12, 2006.











| | 4 | 
| | - |
§ 2400.14 Use of derivative classification. ( a ) Derivative classification is ( 1 ) the determination that information is in substance the same as information currently classified, and
( 2 ) the application of the same classification markings. Persons who only reproduce, extract, or summarize classified information, or who only apply classification markings derived from source material or as directed by a classification guide, need not possess original classification authority. If a person who applies derivative classification markings believes that the paraphrasing, restating, or summarizing of classified information has changed the level of or removed the basis for classification, that person must consult an appropriate official of the originating agency or office of origin who has the authority to declassify, downgrade or upgrade the information.
( b ) Persons who apply derivative classification markings shall: ( 1 ) Observe and respect original classification decisions; and
( 2 ) Carry forward to any newly created documents any assigned authorized markings. The declassification date or event that provides the longest period of classification shall be used for documents classified on the basis of multiple sources.
** 
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

 

We have issued our report dated May 23, 2005, accompanying theconsolidated financial statements of UQM Technologies, Inc. included in theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005. Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Company’sRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-23113, 33-24071, 33-34612,33-35055, 33-34613, 33-41325, 33-64852, 33-47454, 33-81430, 33-92288, 333-101371), andForm S-3 (File Nos. 33-61166, 33-63399, 333-01919, 333-13883, 333-44597, 333-23843,333-50393, 333-52861, 333-67313, 333-78525, 333-75520). 

 

* 
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

 

Denver, Colorado

May 23, 2005

 
 ***
#### JOHN SIMMONS CO., Respondent, v. HERTER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by the John Simmons Company against Maria A. Herter.

C. J. Hardy, for appellant.

J. C. Palmer, for respondent.

No-opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 31.2     

> 
Certification

 

I, Donald A. French, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of UQM Technologies,      Inc.:
2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not      contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material      fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances      under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the      period covered by this annual report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and      other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present      in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations      and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in      this annual report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for      the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or      caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the      registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us      by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which      this annual report is being prepared;
b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's      disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and      procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report      based on such evaluation; and
c.
Disclosed in this annual report our conclusion about      the effectiveness of the internal controls based on our evaluation as well      as any change in the registrant's internal control over financial      reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal      quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual      report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial      reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over      financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit      committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing      the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in      the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which      are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to      record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves      management or other employees who have a significant role in the      registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
Date:  May 21, 2008
/s/ Donald A. French  
Donald A. French  
Treasurer, Secretary and  
Chief Financial Officer
§ 564.40 Procedures for obtaining medical care. ( a ) When a member of the ARNG incurs a disease or an injury, while performing training duty under sections 502-505 of title 32, U.S.C., he/she will, without delay, report the fact to his/her unit commander. Each member will be informed that it is his/her responsibility to comply with these instructions, and that failure to promptly report the occurrence of a disease or injury may result in the loss of medical benefits.
( b ) Authorization for care in civilian facility. ( 1 ) An individual who desires medical or dental care in civilian medical treatment facilities at Federal expense is not authorized such care without written or verbal authorization by the Chief, National Guard Bureau or his/her designee, except in an emergency.
( 2 ) When medical care is obtained without prior authorization, the details will be submitted to NGB-ARS as soon as practicable. The notification of medical care will be made following the format in the appendix. The notification will be reviewed by NGB-ARS and replied to as deemed appropriate.
( c ) Status while undergoing hospitalization. The ARNG status of an individual is not affected by virtue of his hospitalization. The provisions of AR 135-200 will apply. Determination of requirement for continued hospitalization will be made by the MTF commander. Paragraph (d) of this section will apply when a final “not in line of duty” determination has been made. Under no condition will an individual be assigned to the medical holding unit of a hospital.
( d ) Disposition of hospitalized cases. When it is determined that a hospitalized ARNG member has obtained the maximum benefits from hospitalization and there is no disability remaining from the condition for which hospitalized, he/she will be returned to his/her duty station or, if none, to his/her home of record at the time of entry into the hospital.
Appendix notification of injury Date ____________ SUBJECT: Notification of Medical Care and/or Hospitalized Beyond the End of Training Periods. THRU: The Adjutant General State of ________. TO: NGB-ARS, Washington, DC 20310. In accordance with paragraph 8, NGR 40-3, notification of medical care is furnished below: Name: SSN: Grade: Parent unit and station: Type and inclusive dates of training: Date and place of incident: Diagnosis: LOD status: Name and distance of nearest Federal medical facility: Name and address of medical facilities utilized: Estimated cost and duration of treatment: Summary of incident:
(32 U.S.C. 318-320 and 502-505)
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 19, 2020 No. 04-20-00108-CR Genene JONES , Appellant
v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR5730 Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s first motion for an extension of time to file her brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on or before November 16, 2020.

_________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of October, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0214. IN THE INTEREST OF: M. Z. AND S. Z., CHILDREN

(MOTHER).

After careful review of the entire record in this case, we conclude that the

mother’s application for interlocutory appeal was improvidently granted, and it is

ordered that this appeal is hereby dismissed.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/07/2016

July 07, 2016