alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 873.12 Future set-aside program criteria. ( a ) Any State or Indian tribe may receive and retain, without regard to the limitation referred to in section 402(g)(1)(D) of SMCRA, up to 10 percent of the total of the funds distributed annually to such State or Indian tribe under sections 402(g)(1) and (5) of SMCRA for a future set-aside fund if such amounts were awarded before December 20, 2006. The State or Indian tribe must deposit all set-aside funds awarded into a special fund established under State or Indian tribal law. The State or Indian tribe must expend amounts awarded (together with all interest earned on such amounts) solely to achieve the priorities stated in section 403(a) of SMCRA.
( b ) Moneys the State or Indian tribe deposited in the special fund account, together with any interest earned, are considered State or Indian tribal moneys.
[73 FR 67638, Nov. 14, 2008]
### §1606. Authorization of expenditures

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to make such expenditures for rent, outside of the District of Columbia, printing, binding, telegrams, telephones, books of reference, publications, furniture, stationery, office and laboratory equipment, travel, and other supplies, including reporting services, such research necessary to develop methods of processing, bulking, blending, sampling, testing, and merchandising seeds necessary to the administration of this chapter and other necessary expenses in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, and as may be appropriated for by the Congress.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title IV, §416, 53 Stat. 1289.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

See section 1610 of this title.
### §2004. Expedited clearing of title to inventory property

The Farmers Home Administration may employ local attorneys, on a case-by-case basis, to process all legal procedures necessary to clear the title to foreclosed properties in the inventory of the Farmers Home Administration. Such attorneys shall be compensated at not more than their usual and customary charges for such work.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §356, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title VI, §618, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1683.)
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tates** 

# ([ourtof§ppenls for !be jf 

# ebernl ([irruit
HERBERT E. GREGORY, Petitioner, 

### v. GENERAL SERVICESADMINISTRATION, Respondent.

2011-3178 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC0731110018-I-1. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER Herbert E. Gregory moves for leave to proceed in forma paupens. Upon consideration thereof, ITIs ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.GREGORY v. GSA 

## JUll 92011

cc: Herbert 

### E. Gregory Jeanne 

### E. Davidson, Esq. 

### s21 FOR THE COURT lsI 

### Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2



### FILED U.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

## JUL 1 9ZOll
### §306. Repealed. Dec. 16, 1930, ch. 14, §1, 46 Stat. 1028

Section, act July 2, 1862, ch. 130, §6, 12 Stat. 505, related to time of location of land scrip.
### §1766a. Presidential regulations

The President shall prescribe regulations to insure that the official activities of persons assigned abroad under this chapter are carried on (1) consonant with United States foreign policy objectives as defined by the Secretary of State; (2) in accordance with instructions of the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to agricultural matters; and (3) in coordination with other representatives of the United States Government in each country, under the leadership of the Chief of the United States Diplomatic Mission.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title VI, §606B, formerly §602(d), 68 Stat. 909; renumbered Pub. L. 95–501, title IV, §401(3), Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1691.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions comprising this section were formerly classified to section 1762(d) of this title prior to redesignation by section 401(3) of Pub. L. 95–501.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                23,576
<SECURITIES>                          5,004
<RECEIVABLES>                         37,161
<ALLOWANCES>                          280
<INVENTORY>                           9,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      77,688
<PP&E>                                63,681
<DEPRECIATION>                        50,375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        108,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 30,675
<BONDS>                               38,979
<COMMON>                              8,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           62
<OTHER-SE>                            24,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          108,718
<SALES>                               46,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      46,726
<CGS>                                 33,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         42,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      50
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      24
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    1,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       4,183
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   3,643
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          3,643
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .49
        

</TABLE>
#### § 651.18 Introduction.

NEPA documentation will be prepared and published double-sided on recycled paper. The recycled paper symbol should be presented on the inside of document covers.
###### Editorial Note on Part 817

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 817 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 817.114 Revegetation: Mulching and other soil stabilizing practices.

Suitable mulch and other soil stabilizing practices shall be used on all areas that have been regraded and covered by topsoil or topsoil substitutes. The regulatory authority may waive this requirement if seasonal, soil, or slope factors result in a condition where mulch and other soil stabilizing practices are not necessary to control erosion and to promptly establish an effective vegetative cover.

[48 FR 40161, Sept. 2, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017]
### §3605. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. B, title XXII, §2219(a)(5), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–817

Section, Pub. L. 96–236, §5, Apr. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 337, provided for reports to Congress.
§ 37.910 How long must I require participants to keep records related to the TIA? Your TIA must require participants to keep records related to the TIA (for which the agreement provides Government access under § 37.915) for a period of three years after submission of the final financial status report for an expenditure-based TIA or final programmatic status report for a fixed-support TIA, with the following exceptions: ( a ) The participant must keep records longer than three years after submission of the final financial status report if the records relate to an audit, claim, or dispute that begins but does not reach its conclusion within the 3-year period. In that case, the participant must keep the records until the matter is resolved and final action taken.
( b ) Records for any real property or equipment acquired with project funds under the TIA must be kept for three years after final disposition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-Q for the period March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      14,508,410
<SECURITIES>                                 3,611,165
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,202,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (25,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,457,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,150,738
<PP&E>                                      28,875,499
<DEPRECIATION>                            (21,851,420)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,966,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,940,776
<BONDS>                                        820,433
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       108,147
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,152,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,966,120
<SALES>                                     12,140,674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,440,319
<CGS>                                       13,895,955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,719,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,833,271
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             249,787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,046,006)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,046,006)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,046,006)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)
        

</TABLE>
#### WANAMAKER et al., Respondents, v. MEGRAW, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by John Wanamaker and others against Robert H. Megraw.

L. Daily, for appellant.

L. Frankel, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
FORM 6-K



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



Washington, D.C. 20549



Report of Foreign Issuer



Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of



Securities Exchange Act of 1934



For the month of February 2007



ABBEY NATIONAL PLC

(Translation of registrant's name into English)



Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regents

Place, London NW1 3AN, England

(Address of principal executive offices)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . .



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Yes . . . . . . . No . . .X. . . .















---





Abbey National plc



Abbey National plc  2006 Trading Statement  Investor Presentation



A copy of the above document has been submitted to the UK Listing Authority, and will shortly be available for inspection at the UK Listing Authoritys Document Viewing Facility, which is situated at:



Financial Services Authority

25 The North Colonnade

Canary Wharf

London

E14 5HS
















---





SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.









ABBEY NATIONAL PLCDated: 1 February 2007
        By / s / Jessica Petrie(Authorised Signatory)
#### § 200.1560 Notice to other agencies.

Whenever a penalty and/or an assessment becomes final, the following organizations and entities will be notified about such action and the reasons for it: Department of Health and Human Service (HHS) Office of Inspector General, the appropriate State or local medical or professional association; the appropriate quality improvement organization; as appropriate, the State agency that administers each State health care program; the appropriate TRICARE Contractor; the appropriate State or local licensing agency or organization (including the Medicare and Medicaid State survey agencies); and the long-term-care ombudsman.
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.39 Claims payable. ( a ) Claims arising from negligent or wrongful acts or omissions committed by United States military or civilian personnel while acting in the scope of their employment, subject to the exceptions listed in this subpart.
( b ) Claims arising from noncombat activities of the United States, whether or not such injuries of damages arose out of the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions by United States military or civilian employees acting within the scope of their employment.
( c ) Claims for property damage of U.S. military personnel under conditions listed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, where the damage occurred on a military installation and is not payable under the Military Personnel and Civilian Employees' Claims Act.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990, as amended at 55 FR 32076, Aug. 7, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83690, Nov. 22, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          87,813
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  495,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,862
<INVENTORY>                                    115,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               859,563
<PP&E>                                       1,246,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                 696,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,744,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          583,326
<BONDS>                                         75,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,033
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,083,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,744,973
<SALES>                                      1,501,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,899,943
<CGS>                                          651,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  941,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               287,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,021
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,056
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,425)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (17,332)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,757)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00232-CV

In re N.T.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 

Relator’s Motion for Temporary Relief is also denied.

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Kelly

Filed: June 9, 2021
#### Isle of Wight Owner’s Association, Inc., Respondent, v. Missouri Valley Dredging Co. et al., Defendants, and M. A. Goul et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for trespass on land to which plaintiff claims title, and for an injunction, defendants, Goul and Haynes, engineers in the employ of the Department of Public Works of the State of New York, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 27, 1960, denying their motion to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that as to them the complaint on its face fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, Order affirmed, without costs. The fact that said defendants are employees of the State and were acting in the course of their official duties does not exempt them from personal responsibility for trespass upon plaintiff’s land. *(Sanders*v. *Saxton,*182 N. Y. 477, 479; *Litchfield*v. *Bond,*186 N. Y. 66; *Pauchogue Land Corp.*v. *State Park Comm.,*243 N. Y. 15; *Ottmann*v. *Village of Rockville Centre,*275 N. Y. 270; *Moynihan*v. *Todd,*188 Mass. 301; *Rhynders*v. *Greene,*255 App. Div. 401.) Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., concurs in the result, being of opinion that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a good cause of action for an injunction, and that it is unnecessary now to determine the issue as to the liability of these two defendants for damages resulting from the claimed trespass.
EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viskase
Companies, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, I, F. Edward
Gustafson, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Viskase
Companies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viskase Companies, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Viskase Companies, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Viskase Companies, Inc.



Date:  November 14, 2002

                           /s/  F. Edward Gustafson
                           ------------------------
                           F. Edward Gustafson
                           Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
### §8960. Studies, reports, and audits

(a) Each contract shall contain provisions requiring the qualified company to—

(1) furnish such reasonable reports as the Office determines to be necessary to enable it to carry out its functions under this chapter; and

(2) permit the Office and representatives of the Government Accountability Office to examine such records of the qualified company as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(b) Each Federal agency shall keep such records, make such certifications, and furnish the Office, the qualified company, or both, with such information and reports as the Office may require.

(c) The Office shall conduct periodic reviews of plans under this chapter, including a comparison of the dental benefits available under chapter 89, to ensure the competitiveness of plans under this chapter. The Office shall cooperate with the Government Accountability Office to provide periodic evaluations of the program.

(Added Pub. L. 108–496, §2, Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 4005.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 23, 2004, and applicable to contracts that take effect with respect to the calendar year 2006, see section 7 of Pub. L. 108–496, set out as a note under section 8951 of this title.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Tectonics
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended November 26, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William F. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
I, Duane D. Deaner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ William F. Mitchell
                                        -------------------------------
                                            William F. Mitchell
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Duane D. Deaner
                                        --------------------------------
                                            Duane D. Deaner
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                            January 10, 2005


         This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed to be filed by the Company for purpose
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 725.3 Authority to act. ( a ) The General Counsel of the Navy, the Judge Advocate General of the Navy, and their respective delegates [hereafter “determining authorities” described in § 725.4(a), shall respond to litigation requests or demands for official DOD information or testimony by DON personnel as witnesses.
( b ) If required by the scope of their respective delegations, determining authorities' responses may include: consultation and coordination with the Department of Justice or the appropriate United States Attorney as required; referral of matters proprietary to another DOD component to that component; determination whether official information originated by the Navy may be released in litigation; and determination whether DOD personnel assigned to or affiliated with the Navy may be interviewed, contacted, or used as witnesses concerning official DOD information or as expert or opinion witnesses. Following coordination with the appropriate commander, a response may further include whether installations, facilities, ships, or aircraft may be visited or inspected; what, if any, conditions will be imposed upon any release, interview, contact, testimony, visit, or inspection; what, if any, fees shall be charged or waived for access under the fee assessment considerations set forth in § 725.11; and what, if any, claims of privilege, pursuant to this instruction, may be invoked before any tribunal.