Mr.RonGoreChiefAirDivisionUNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGION4ATLANTAFEDERALCENTER61FORSYTHSTREETATLANTA,GEORGIA30303-8960NOVI92015AlabamaDepartmentofEnvironmentalManagement1400ColiseumBoulevardMontgomery,Alabama36130DearMr.Gore:ThankyouforsubmittingthestateofAlabama's2015AmbientAirMonitoringNetworkPlan(NetworkPlan}datedJuly22,2015.TheNetworkPlanisrequiredby40CodeofFederalRegulations(CFR}§58.10.TheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyunderstandsthattheAlabamaDepartmentofEnvironmentalManagement(ADEM)providedthepublica30-dayreviewperiodforreviewingtheNetworkPlanandseveralcommentswerereceivedandforwardedtotheEPA.TheEPAhasreviewedtheNetworkPlan,thepubliccomments,andtheADEM'sresponsetocomments.Withthisletter,theEPAisapprovingADEM'sNetworkPlanwithoneexception.TheEPAdoesnotapprovetherequestforanationalambientairqualitystandard(NAAQS)exclusionfordataassociatedwiththePM2.sfederalequivalentmethod(FEM)monitorattheNorthBirminghamsite(AQSID01-079-0023).Afteranalyzingthedatafrommonitorsinthearea,theEPAconsidersthedatafromtheNorthBirminghammonitortobecomparabletoboththeannualand24-hourPM2.sNAAQS.Therationaleforourpositionisincludedin"ProposedMonitoringNetworkChanges"sectionoftheenclosure.Intheenclosure,wehaveprovidedcommentsonthecurrentNetworkPlanaswellasconsiderationsforyourfuturemonitoringnetwork.Pleaseletusknowifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthesecomments.ThankyouforyourworkwithustomonitorairpollutionandpromotehealthyairqualityinAlabama.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsorconcerns,pleasecontactGreggWorleyat(404}562-9141orDarrenPalmerat(404)562-9052.CfJBeverlyH.Banis!;('DirectorAir,PesticidesandTaxiesManagementDivisionInternetAddress(URL)•hHp://www.epa.govRecycled/Recyclable•PrintedwithVegetableOilBasedInksonRecycledPaper(Minimum30%Postconsumer)Enclosure

cc: Jonathan Stanton, Director

Jefferson County Department of Health

Daniel E . Shea, Director

Huntsville Department of Natural ResourcesCY2015StateofAlabamaAmbientAirMonitoringNetworkPlanU.S.EPARegion4CommentsandRecommendationsThisdocumentcontainsU.S.EPAcommentsandrecommendationsonthestateofAlabama's2015ambientairmonitoringnetworkplan(NetworkPlan).Ambientairmonitoringrules,whichincluderegulatoryrequirementsthataddressnetworkplans,datacertification,andminimummonitoringrequirements,amongotherrequirements,arefoundin40CFRPart58.Minimummonitoringrequirementsforcriteriapollutantsarelistedin40CFRPart58,AppendixD.Minimummonitoringrequirementsarelistedforozone(OJ),particulatematterlessthan2.5microns(PM2.s),particulatematterlessthanI0microns(PM10},nitrogendioxide(N02),sulfurdioxide(S02),carbonmonoxide(CO)andlead(Pb).Theminimummonitoringrequirementsarebasedoncorebasedstatisticalarea(CBSA)boundaries,asdefinedbytheU.S.OfficeofManagementandBudget's(OMB)JulyI,20I4,populationestimatesfromtheU.S.CensusBureau,andhistoricalambientairmonitoringdata.MinimummonitoringrequirementsforOJ,PM2.s,andPMw,onlyapplytometropolitanstatisticalareas(MSAs),whichareasubsetofCBSAscontaininganurbancoreof50,000ormorepopulation.OMBcurrentlydefines13MSAsinthestateofAlabama.TheseMSAsandtherespectiveJuly1,2014,populationestimatesfromtheU.S.CensusBureauareshowninTableI.Table1:MetropolitanStatisticalArensandPopulationsMSANamePopulationAnniston-Oxford-Jacksonvillc,AL115,916Auburn·Opetika,AL154,255Binningham·Hoover,AL1,143,772Columbus,GA-AL314,005Daphne-Fairhope-Foley,AL200,111Decatur,AL153,084Dothan,AL148,095Florence-MuscleShoals,AL147,639Gadsden,AL103,531Huntsville,AL441,086Mobile,AL415,123Montgomery,AL373,141Tuscaloosa,AL237,761ProposedMonitoringNetworkChangesInitsresponsetotheNetworkPlansubmittedbyADEMin2014,EPAapprovedseveralchangestoADEM'smonitoringnetworkthathavesincebeenimplemented.Thesechangesare summarizedinTable2below.Table2:EPAApprovedChangesfrom2014NetworkPlanAQSSiteIDPollutantMonitorActionTakenTe01-073-1003PMwSLAMSDiscontinuedLowVolumePMw01-073-1005PM10SLAMSDiscontinuedLowVolumePM11101-073·6002PM10SLAMSDiscontinuedLowVolumePMw01-073-6004PMwSLAMSDiscontinuedLowVolumePMw01-073-2059N02,CO,PM2.sSLAMSEstablishedNear-roadN0201-097.0016PMIOSLAMSDiscontinuedPMwSiteEPAapprovedtheeliminationofPM10monitoringattheFairfieldandMcAdorysiteslistedabove(AQSIDs01-073-1003and01-073-1005,respectively)becausethesesitesmeasuredthelowestPM10concentrationsintheBirminghamMSAandbecauseaftertheirshutdowntheJeffersonCountyDepartmentofHealth(JCDH)wouldstilloperatemorethantherequirednumberofmonitorsfortheMSA.TheTarrantandShuttlesworthsites(AQSID01-073-6002and01-073-6004)maintainregulatoryPM10continuousmonitoring.TheShuttlesworthsiteisthePM10maximumconcentrationsiteforthearea.TheEPArequeststhattheJeffersonCountyDepartmentofHealth(JCDH)changethemonitoringobjectivetoreflectthisbyDecember31,2015.Finally,theEPArequiresthattheJCDHbeginreportingthePM10continuousdatatoEPA'sAirNownetworkeffectiveJanuary1,2016.WerequestthattheJCDHlettheEPAknowifitwillbeunabletomeetthisdeadline.TheJCDHdiscontinuedthePM2.sspecialpurposemonitorattheShuttlesworthsite(AQSID01-073-6004)attheendofAugust2014.FortyCFR§58.20givesagenciestheflexibilitytoconductshorttermmonitoring,likethemonitoringJCDHconductedatShuttlesworth,withoutthedatabeingusedforregulatorydecisionmaking.TheEPAunderstandsthat,whilenotrequired,theJCDHisconsideringconductingspecialpurposePM2smonitoringusingacontinuous,taperedelementoscillatingmicrobalance(TEOM)PM2..smonitoratShuttlesworthandreportingthedatatoAirNow.Itwasnotedinthe2014NetworkPlanthatPelhamHighSchoolrepresentativesinShelbyCounty,Alabamarequestedthatthemonitorontheirproperty(AQSID01-117-0006)bemovedtoanalternatelocationonthesameproperty.Atthetimeofourresponselastyear,itwasEPA'sunderstandingthatADEMwasworkingonanagreementwiththeschooltoestablishpoweratthealternatelocationandmovethemonitorbeforetheendofcalendaryear2014.Inthisyear'splan,ADEMstatedthatasuitablelocationwasnotfoundandthatthemonitorwasshutdowninJune2015sinceitmeasuredthelowestconcentrationsinthearea.ThisshutdownofaSLAMSmonitorwasnotapprovedbytheEPAasrequiredin40CFR§58.J4.BecausethismonitorhashadthelowestdesignvaluesofallthePM2.smonitorsintheBirminghamMSAsincethe2011-2013periodandthattheminimummonitoringrequirementsfortheMSAcontinuetobemet,EPAisretroactivelyapprovingitsshutdown.However,wewanttocautionyouthatinthefutureyoushouldsubmitshutdownrequestsinadvance.IndoingsoyouavoidthepossibilityofhavingEPArequirethatasitebereestablished.ProposedmonitoringnetworkchangesarefoundonPages6and7oftheNetworkPlan(secTable3).NochangeswereproposedtotheCityofHuntsville'sairmonitoringnetworkotherthanthediscontinuationofthechemicalspeciationmonitorthatwasdefundedbytheEPA.However,duringourreviewwedeterminedthattheCityofHuntsville'slocalagencywillneedtoinstal1acollocatedPMwsampleratoneofitscurrentsites.Therationaleforthisdeterminationareincludedinthe"PM10MonitoringRequirements"sectionbelow.2Table3:ProposedChangesinthe2015NetworkPlanAQSSiteIDPollutantMonitorTypeActionTakenEPAComments01·089·0014PM25SpeciationCSNShutdownApproved,monitordefunded01·101·1002PM25SpeciationCSNShutdownApproved,monitordefunded01·117·0006PM25SLAMSShutdownApproved,lowdesignvalue01·073·6004coSLAMSShutdownApprovedatendof2015TheJCDHproposedtodiscontinueCOmonitoringattheShuttlesworthsite(AQS1001-073-6004)attheendof2015.TheCOmonitorisalongsource-orientedmonitorandhasbeenmeasuringverylowconcentrationssince2010afterthemineralwoolproductionfacilitywasshutdownattheWalterEnergyfacility.Thismonitormeetstherequirementsfordiscontinuationper40CFR§58.14(c)(1)and(2).ThreeCOmonitoringsiteswillremaininJeffersonCounty(AQS1001-073-0023,01-073-1and01-073-2059).EPAwillrequiretheJCDHtorestartCOmonitoringeffortsattheShuttlesworthsiteshouldfutureCOemissionsatthefacilitysignificantlyincrease.Awaiverrequestwasincludedinthisyear'splanforaNAAQSexclusionofdatafromthePM2.scontinuousfederalequivalentmethod(FEM)samplerlocatedattheNorthBirminghamsite(AQSID01-073-0023).BasedonthestatisticalsummaryfromEPA'sFEMComparabilityAssessmenttool(attached),theFEMdataareconsideredcomparabletoboththedailyandannualPM2.sNAAQS.Asaresult,theEPAcannotapprovethewaiverrequest.Wearewillingtohavefurtherdiscussionswithyouaboutourreviewortoreevaluatethisrequestonceall2015datahavebeenreported.AirQualityIndex(AQI)Reporting40CFR§58.50AQIreportingisrequiredinMSAswithpopulationsover350,000.FourMSAsinAlabamaarerequiredtoreportanAQI:Huntsville,Mobile,andMontgomery.Thestate'sNetworkPlanonPage6containslinkstotheADEM,JCOHandHuntsvilleDepartmentofNaturalResourcesWebsiteswherethisinformationcanbeobtained.ThissatisfiestheAQIreportingrequirementforthestate.NationalCore(NCore)MonitoringNetwork40CFRPart58,AppendixD,3.0ThestateisrequiredtohaveoneNCoresite.TheNCoresitemustmeasure,ataminimum,PM2.sparticlemassusingcontinuousandintegrated/filter-basedsamplers,speciatedPM2s,PM10-2.sparticlemass,03,S02,CO,NO/NOy,windspeed,winddirection,relativehumidity,andambienttemperature.NCoresitesinCBSAswithpopulationsof500,000people(asdeterminedinthelatestCensus)orgreaterarealsorequiredtomeasurePheitherasPb-TSPorPb-PM10.TheNorthBirminghamsite(AQSID01-073-0023)wasapprovedasthestate'sNCoresitebyOAQPSonOctober30,2009andcurrentlymeetsallrequirementsforthestate.03MonitoringRequirements40CFRPart58,AppendixD,TableD-2Region4hasdeterminedthatthe03monitoringnetworkoutlinedintheNetworkPlanmeetstheminimumrequirementsfoundin40CFRPart58,AppendixD,TableD-2forallMSAs.3

# CO Monitoring Requirements

40 CFR, Part 58, Appendix D, 4.2

Ambient air monitoring network design criteria for CO are found in 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, 4.2.

This section requires CBSAs with populations over one million to operate one CO monitor collocated

with a near-road N0 2 monitor

. Forty C F R §58

. 13(e)(2) spe ci fically requires the monitor be operational

by January 1

, 2017

. This requirement is already being met for the Birmingham CBSA by the CO

monitor at the Arkadelphia near-road site (AQS ID 01-073

- 2059). CO monitoring is also a requirement

for the NCore network and a CO monitor is l ocated at the state's only NCore site in Birmingham (AQS

ID 01-073-0023)

. Additionally, we have determined that the CO monitor loca t ed at the Fairfield site (AQS ID 0 1-073

·

I

003) in Jefferson County is the maximum concentration site for the Birmingham CBSA. We request

the JCDH make this change to the mon i toring objective for that monitor by December 31, 2015

.

In summary, the C O monitoring network oudincd in t h e Network Plan meets the minimum requ i rement s

for

a11 CBSAs.

N02 

# Monitoring Requirements

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, 4

. 3

Ambient air monitoring network design criteria for N0 1 

# arc found in 40 CFR Part 58, Append i x D, 4.3.

There are three types of required N0 2 mon i toring: ncar-road, area-wide, and Regional Administrator.

These types ofN0 2 monitoring arc described i n sections 4 .3 .2

, 4. 3.3, and 4.4.4, respectively

.

The B i rmingham area is the onl y CBSA required to operate a ncar - road N0 2 monito ri n g station in

Alabama . The JCDH operates a N0 2 monitor at the Arkadelphia near-road s ite (AQS ID 01

- 073

- 2059)

to meet this requ i rement. The Arkadelph i a ncar · road mon i toring site was approved in the EPA's

response to Alabama's 2013 Network Plan

.

The Birmi n gham area i s the only CBSA in Alabama required to operate an area-wide NO :! monitoring

stat i on. T he JDHC opera t es a N02 monitor at the N o rth Binningh a m NCore si t e (AQS ID 01

- 073-0023)

.

Thus,

the requirement for area-wide N0 2 mon i toring i s met.

No monitoring in A l abama have been des i gnated as Regional Administrator

**NO ~**  

# monitorin g site s

. There

i s no defi ci ency wi t h this requirement. The full l i st of N02 monitors ident ifi ed by the Re g ional

Admi n istrators can be found on EPA's website at htt p : // www

. e p a. g ov / ttnamtil / sv p o p. h t ml

All of the requirements for N02 monitoring arc met for the Binningham CBSA and no o t her CBSA in

Alabama is required to monitor for N0 2 at th i s t i me

.



# S02 

# Monitoring Requirements

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, 4.4

Amb i ent air monitoring network design criteria for S02 arc found in 40 CFR Part 58

, Appendix D, 4.4

.

This

section requires that "The population weighted emissions index (PWEI) shall be calculated by

states for each core based stat i stical area (CBSA)

. " As a result, the S0 2 monitoring site(s) required in

each CBSA will satisfy minimum monitoring requirements if the monitor(s) is sited within the

boundari e s of the parent CBSA and is of the following site types : popu l ation exposure, maximum



# 4concentration,source-oriented,generalbackground,orregionaltransport.AnS02monitoratanNCorestationmaysatisfyminimummonitoringrequirementsifthatmonitorislocatedwithinaCBSAwithminimallyrequiredmonitorsconsistentwithAppendixD,4.4.Atthistime,theBirminghamandMobileCBSAsarerequiredtohavetwoandoneS02monitors,respectively.TheS02monitoringnetworkdesignoutlinedintheNetworkPlanmeetstheminimumrequirements.EPAfinalizedtheS02DataRequirementsRule(ORR)(see80FederalRegister,No.162,August,21,2015).ThisrulewillrequirecharacterizationoftheairqualitynearsourceswithS02emissionsgreaterthan2,000tonsperyearbyconductingambientairmonitoringormodeling.WeencourageyouragencytobeginhavingconversationswithaffectedsourcesinyourstatetodetermineanagreeduponapproachformeetingtheORRrequirements.ByJanuary15,2016,ADEMmustsubmitafinallistofsourcestoEPARegion4identifyingthesourcesinthestatearoundwhichS02airqualitymustbecharacterized.ForsourcesthatADEMdecidestoevaluateusingambientairmonitoringdata,newsiteproposalsmustbeincludedinthe2016NetworkPlan.ThelocationofthesemonitoringsitesshouldbeselectedusingtheprocessoutlinedintheS02NAAQSDesignationsSource-OrientedMonitoringTechnicalAssistanceDocument1•PbMonitoringRequirements40CFRPart58,AppendixD,4.5FortyCFRPart58,AppendixD,4.5requiresthat"Ataminimum,theremustbeonesource-orientedSLAMS[StateandLocalAirMonitoringStation]sitelocatedtomeasurethemaximumPbconcentrationinambientairresultingfromeachnon-airportPbsourcewhichemits0.50ormoretonsperyear[tpy]andfromeachairportwhichemits1.0ormoretonsperyear..."MonitoringisongoingasrequiredneartheSandersLeadCompanyinTroy,Alabama.PbmonitoringisalsoongoingattheNorthBirminghamNCoresite.However,wehaveidentifiedonepotentialdeficiencyinthePbsourcemonitoringnetwork.Basedonthemostcurrentemissionsdataavailable,the2011NationalEmissionsInventory(NEI),theAnnistonArmyDepotemits1.79tpyofPb.Pbsourcemonitoringwaiversarerequiredby40CFRPart58,AppendixD,Section4.5andaretoberenewedineach5-yearnetworkassessment.TherewasnodiscussionineithertheNetworkPlanorthenetworkassessmentregardingwhethermonitoringisappropriateatthisfacilityorwhetherthestateisrequestingawaiverofmonitoringrequirements.Thestateisrequestedtosubmitanaddendumtothe5-yearnetworkassessmentbyDecember31,2015,addressingthesemonitoringrequirementsforthisfacility.Ifcompellingdocumentationinsupportofawaiverofthemonitoringrequirementscannotbeprovided,thenthestatewillneedtoprovideascheduleforwhenPbsourcemonitoringwillbeestablished.MonitoringshouldbeginnolaterthanDecember31,2016.Wewillworkwithyouragencyasnecessarytodeterminethemostappropriatelocationforambientairmonitoringaroundthefacility.Otherthanthisonepotentialdeficiency,thePbmonitoringnetworkdescribedinthestate'sNetworkPlanmeetsallofthedesigncriteriaof40CFRPart58.1S02NAAQSDesignationsSource-OrientedMonitoringTechnicalAssistanceDocument.U.S.EPAOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsAirQualityAssessmentDivision,DraftDecember2013.http:t/www3.epa.gov/airgualitvlsulfurdioxide/pdfsJS02MonitoringTAD.pdf5

# PM1o Monitoring Requirements

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix A, 3.3.1

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Table D-4

Region 4 has detennined that the PM 1o monitoring network outlined in the Network Plan meets or

exceeds the minimum requirements found in 

# 40 CFR Part 

# 58, Appendix 

# 0, Table 

# 0-4 for all MSAs.

However, the collocation requirements for manual PM 

# w monitors are not being fully met for all areas.

Collocation requirements apply to each PQAO and are based on the sampling methods employed. Th e

City of Huntsville's local agency will officially become its own PQAO on January 

# 1, 2016, and must

meet the collocation requirements separate from the state. While the Old A•rport site (AQS 

# 10 01-089

·

0014)

in Huntsville does have a collocated manual PM10 monitor, no concentration data from that

monitor has been reported to EPA ' s Air Quality System. They must begin reporting these collocated

sampling data effective January 

# 1, 2016

. Please be sure to note this change in the Network Plan to be

submitted in 

# 2016.

PMz . s Monitoring Requirements

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix A, 3.2.5

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Table D-5

Region 4 has detenn i ned that the PM 2 

# s monitoring network outlined in the Network Plan meets the

minimum requirements found in 

# 40 CFR Part 

# 58, Appendix 

# 0, Table 

# 0-5 for all MSAs

. The PM 2 

# s

collocation requirement found in 

# 40 CFR Part 

# 58, Appe n dix A, 

# 3.2.5.2 for manual reference and

equivalent methods collocated PM !

. S mon i toring is also met.



# PM2 . s Ncar-road Monitoring Requirement

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, 4.7.1(b)(2)

Regu l a t ory requirements in 

# 40 CFR Part 

# 58

, Appendix 

# 0

, 4. 

# 7

. 1 (b 

# )(2) requ i re that " CBS As with a

population o f 

# 1

, 000,000 or more persons

, at leas t one PM2 

# s monitor, i s to be collocated at a near-road

N0 2 sta ti on

. " The PM2 

# s monitor at the Arkade l phia near-road site (AQS 

# 10 0 1-07 3 -2059) i n

Birmingham fulfills t his requirement.



# PMz.s Continuous Monitoring Requirements

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, 4.7.2

Regulatory provisio n s for continuous 

# PM 2 5 

# monitoring require that "The state, or where appropriate,

local agencies must operate continuous PM2 5 

# analyzers equal to at least one-half (round up) the

minimum required sites listed in Table 

# 0--5 of this appendix

. At least one required continuous analyzer

in each MSA must be collocated wi t h one of the required FRM, Federal Equiva l ent Method (FEM),

Approved Regiona l Method (ARM) monitors

, unless at least one of the required FRM / FEM / ARM

monitors is i tself a continuous FEM or ARM monitor in which case no collocation requirement applies. "

After review of the Network Plan

, Region 4 has detennined that the PM 2.5 continuous monitoring

netwo r k meets or exceeds the minimum monitoring requirements in all of the MSAs in the state.



# PM2 . s Background and Transport Sites

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, 4.7.3

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, 

# 4.7.3 requires tha t "Each state shall install and operate at least one PM2 

# s

site to mon i tor for r egional background levels an d at least one PM :u site to monitor for regional

6transport.'

1 The 2015 Network

Plan identifies

the Crossville

site (AQS

10 01-149-1003)

in Dekalb County

as

a rural background

site,

and

the Ashland

site (AQS

ID 01-027-0001)

in Clay County

as

a regional

transport

site

. Regulatory

FRM monitors

are operated

at these

two sites. ADEM

has satisfied the requirements

for regional background

and transport

sites

. PM2.s Chemical Speciation

Network

(CSN) 40 CFR

Part

58, Appendix

D,

4. 7.4 The

EPA conducted

an assessment

of the CSN

in

an effort

to optimize

the network

and create

a network that

is sustainable

going forward.

As

a result

of this assessment,

the EPA

de funded

a number

of monitoring

sites, eliminated

the CSN

PM2.s

mass measurement,

reduced

the frequency

of carbon

blanks, reduced

sample frequency

at some monitoring

sites,

and reduced

the number

of icepacks

in shipment during

cooler months

of the year.

As noted

in the Network

Plan,

the following

CSN monitoring

sites

in Alabama

were defunded

and have

been discontinued:

the Huntsville

Old Airport

site (AQS

ID 01-089- 0014)

and

the Montgomery

MOMS

site (AQS

ID 01-101-1002). The remaining

CSN network,

with

sites

in Birmingham

and Phenix

City,

AL, meets

the requirements and

no other changes

to the CSN network

are being approved

at this time. Photochemical

Assessment

Monitoring

Station (PAMS) 40 CFR

Part

58, Appendix

D, 5.0 With

the promulgation

of

a new

OJ NAAQSs

on October

1, 2015,

the EPA

also finalized

changes

to PAMS program.

By June

1, 2019,

the NCore

site

in Birmingham

will

be required

to implement

PAMS monitoring.

While

the EPA recognizes

there

are several implementation

challenges

to work through,

we will work closely

with ADEM

and JCDH

to minimize

the burden

of implementing

this

new monitoring program.

At this time, however,

there

is no

P AMS requirement

for

the state

of Alabama. Other Concerns On Page

10

of the Network

Plan

the ADEM indicates

that

40 CFR

Part

58, Appendix

E siting criteria are being

met

at

all sites. However,

no evidence

of that

was provided.

Because

most

of these

sites

are used

in regulatory decision-making,

evaluating

the conditions

at these monitoring

sites

on

an ongoing basis

is critically important

to ensure

that

the data collected

are

of sufficient

quality.

EPA requests

that the ADEM

include

in next year's

plan recent pictures

of

all sites

with

a statement indicating:

that

the siting criteria

for each

site have

been evaluated,

the date

on which

the evaluation

occurred,

and whether the sites

meet

or

do not meet

the current requirements.

If sites

do not meet

the current requirements,

the ADEM

should include

a statement

on

the corrections

that need

to be made

and

a schedule

of when

these corrections

will

be made.

If you would

like

to see examples

of how other agencies

are meeting

this requirement

in the context

of their annual Network

Plans,

we

can share

them

with

you

. 7