alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1 Section 333 Exemption Request

– Maintenance & Inspection Manual | Tom Kilpatrick | May 4, 2015 Maintenance & Inspection Manual

DJI Inspire 1 Supplemental to Section 333 Exemption Request | Tom Kilpatrick | May 4, 2015

DATE EVENT DISCREPANCY ACTION RESOLUTION

00/00 / 0000 Aircraft tipped over on landing 2 propellers damaged Propellers replaced by TK Returned to service

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ _____________ _______

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________ ________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ __________________ __

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Ennis Business Forms,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  August
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on
the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Keith  S.  Walters,  Chief
Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,
      in all  material  respects, the  financial  condition  and
      result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Keith S. Walters

Keith S. Walters
Chief Executive Officer
October 14, 2002
§ 635.17 Release of domestic incidents reports to the Army Family Advocacy Program (FAP). ( a ) Installation PM/DES will comply with the reporting requirements set forth in AR 608-18 (available at *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r608_18.pdf*).
( b ) In addition to substantiated incidents of domestic violence, installation PM/DES will notify the Family Advocacy Program Manager (FAPM) and Social Work Services (SWS) of all incidents in which a preponderance of indicators reveal a potential risk of reoccurrence and increasing severity of maltreatment which could lead to domestic violence or child abuse. Installation PM/DES will ensure these notifications are recorded in the official military police journal in ALERTS. This is to: ( 1 ) Establish a history of incidents that indicate an emerging pattern of risk of maltreatment/victimization to Soldiers and or Family members. See AR 608-18 for incidents that define maltreatment.
( 2 ) Develop a trend history of unsubstantiated-unresolved incidents in order to prevent possible violence or maltreatment from occurring.
[80 FR 28549, May 19, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 17386, Mar. 29, 2016]
#### Head *et al. vs.*Aycock, administrator, *et al.*

'This bill was brought by tbe heirs at law of Allen Dykes against the administrator of B. B. Dykes and Westbrook and others, creditors of B. B. Dyke, to restrain the said administrator from selling a certain tract of land, which complainants allege that B. B. Dykes bought from Allen Dykes in 1857, and has not paid therefor. The asserted equity of the bill is, that the land is subject to the vendor’s lien; and that the administrator cannot sell it to pay W estbrook and other creditors of B. B. Dykes, because those creditors are postponed to Allen Dykes; the vendor, by virtue of his vendor’s lien, which was in force in 1857; and if the administrator should sell it the 'complainants could not bid, being poor, tlio land would bring nothing-'.scarcely, and they, as heirs of the vendor and entitled to the lien, would virtually lose it.

.Passing by the fact that the administrator, if he sold, would apply the proceeds according to priority of lien of creditors, and that the poverty of complainants is their misfortune but would hardly give them any equity; and the 'further fact that the demand is stale and the statute of limitations of 1869 would seem to he in the way; — on the . cuse presented, the creditors of B. B. Dykes, who arfe not charged with notice of the vendor’s lien in the complainants’ bill, nor is the allegation made in the hill that they were creditors prior to the sale *442of the lands from Allen Dykes to B. B. Dykes, have the superior right to be paid out of the lands over the vendor’s lien; and consequently the administrator should not be restrained from selling to pay them. Mounce *vs.*Byars *et al.,*11 *Ga.,*180; Chance *vs.*McWhorter *et al.,*26 *Ga., 315,*322.

Jackson, Justice.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0483

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

JAMIE CAL FUSON,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Robert G. Olson, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 3 2022

08/03/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0483
§ 750.32 Suits under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). ( a ) *Venue.* Venue is proper only in the judicial district where the plaintiff resides or where the act or omission complained of occurred. 28 U.S.C. 1402.
( b ) *Jury trial.* There is no right to trial by jury in suits brought under the FTCA. 28 U.S.C. 2402.
( c ) *Settlement.* The Attorney General of the United States, or designee, may arbitrate, compromise, or settle any action filed under the FTCA. 28 U.S.C. 2677.
( d ) *Litigation support* — ( 1 ) *Who provides.* The adjudicating authority holding a claim at the time suit is filed shall be responsible for providing necessary assistance to the Department of Justice official or U.S. Attorney responsible for defending the Government's interests.
( 2 ) *Litigation report.* A litigation report, including a legal memorandum emphasizing anticipated issues during litigation, shall be furnished to the appropriate Department of Justice official or U.S. Attorney.
( 3 ) *Pretrial discovery.* Complete and timely responses to discovery requests are vital to the effective defense of tort litigation. Subject to existing personnel and resources available, appropriate assistance shall be provided. The Judge Advocate General should be notified promptly when special problems are encountered in providing the requested assistance.
( 4 ) *Preservation of evidence.* Tort litigation is often accomplished over an extended period of time. Every effort shall be made to preserve files, documents, and other tangible evidence that may bear on litigation. Destruction of such evidence, even in accordance with routine operating procedures, undermines defense of a case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1996
<CASH>                                      39,195,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               83,660,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,692,000)
<INVENTORY>                                100,737,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           247,873,000
<PP&E>                                     562,711,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             107,398,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             878,986,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      132,337,000
<BONDS>                                    522,550,000
<COMMON>                                       145,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  95,728,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               878,986,000
<SALES>                                    489,308,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           489,308,000
<CGS>                                      366,525,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              366,525,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               985,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          43,954,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (19,816,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (5,800,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,016,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,016,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.98)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 536.33 Use of small claims procedures.

Small claims procedures are authorized for use whenever a claim may be settled for $5,000 or less. These procedures are designed to save processing time and eliminate the need for most of the documentation otherwise required. These procedures are described in DA Pam 27-162, paragraphs 2-14 and 2-26.
#### §§ 1807.161-1807.169 [Reserved]
#### § 1621.3 Duty to report for and submit to examination.

When the Director orders a registrant for examination, it shall be the duty of the registrant to report for and submit to examination at the time and place ordered unless the order has been canceled. If the time when the registrant is ordered to report for examination is postponed, it shall be the continuing duty of the registrant to report for and submit to examination at such time and place as he may be reordered. Regardless of the time when, or the circumstances under which a registrant fails to report for examination when it is his duty to do so, it shall thereafter be his continuing duty from day to day to report for and submit to examination at the place specified in the order to report for examination.

[52 FR 8890, Mar. 20, 1987]
§ 553.46 Ineligibility for interment, inurnment or memorialization in an Army Post Cemetery. The following persons are not eligible for interment, inurnment, or memorialization in an Army Post Cemetery: ( a ) A father, mother, brother, sister, or in-law solely on the basis of his or her relationship to a primarily eligible person, even though the individual is: ( 1 ) Dependent on the primarily eligible person for support; or
( 2 ) A member of the primarily eligible person's household.
( b ) Except for the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks Cemetery in § 553.45, a person whose last period of service was not characterized as an honorable discharge (*e.g.,* a separation or discharge under general but honorable conditions, other than honorable conditions, a bad conduct discharge, a dishonorable discharge, or a dismissal), regardless of whether the person: ( 1 ) Received any other veterans' benefits; or
( 2 ) Was treated at a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital or died in such a hospital.
( c ) A person who has volunteered for service with the U.S. Armed Forces, but has not yet entered on active duty.
( d ) A former spouse whose marriage to the primarily eligible person ended in divorce.
( e ) A spouse who predeceases the primarily eligible person and is interred or inurned in a location other than an Army Cemetery, and the primarily eligible person remarries.
( f ) A divorced spouse of a primarily eligible person or the service-connected parent when the divorced spouse has a child interred or inurned in an Army Cemetery under the child's derivative eligibility.
( g ) Otherwise derivatively eligible persons, such as a spouse or minor child, if the primarily eligible person was not or will not be interred or inurned at an Army Cemetery.
( h ) A person convicted in a Federal court or by a court-martial of any offense involving subversive activity or an offense described in 18 U.S.C. 1751 (except for military prisoners at the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks Cemetery).
( i ) A service member who dies while on active duty, if the first General Courts Martial Convening Authority in the service member's chain of command determines that there is clear and convincing evidence that the service member engaged in conduct that would have resulted in a separation or discharge not characterized as an honorable discharge (*e.g.,* a separation or discharge under general but honorable conditions, other than honorable conditions, a bad conduct discharge, a dishonorable discharge, or a dismissal) being imposed, but for the death of the service member.
( j ) If animal remains are unintentionally commingled with human remains due to a natural disaster, unforeseen accident, act of war or terrorism, violent explosion, or similar incident, and such remains cannot be separated from the remains of an eligible person, then the remains may be interred or inurned with the eligible person, but the identity of the animal remains shall not be inscribed or identified on a niche, marker, headstone, or otherwise.
Page 1 of 1 Section 333 Exemption Request – Maintenance & Inspection Manual | Tom Kilpatrick | May 4, 2015

Maintenance & Inspection Manual

DJI Inspire 1

Supplemental to Section 333 Exemption Request | Tom Kilpatrick | May 4, 2015

DATE EVENT DISCREPANCY ACTION RESOLUTION

00/00/0000 Aircraft tipped over on landing 2 propellers damaged Propellers replaced by TK Returned to service

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________
### §1547. Interpretation of joint resolution

#### (a) Inferences from any law or treaty

Authority to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances shall not be inferred—

(1) from any provision of law (whether or not in effect before November 7, 1973), including any provision contained in any appropriation Act, unless such provision specifically authorizes the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into such situations and states that it is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of this chapter; or

(2) from any treaty heretofore or hereafter ratified unless such treaty is implemented by legislation specifically authorizing the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into such situations and stating that it is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of this chapter.

#### (b) Joint headquarters operations of high-level military commands

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require any further specific statutory authorization to permit members of United States Armed Forces to participate jointly with members of the armed forces of one or more foreign countries in the headquarters operations of high-level military commands which were established prior to November 7, 1973, and pursuant to the United Nations Charter or any treaty ratified by the United States prior to such date.

#### (c) Introduction of United States Armed Forces

For purposes of this chapter, the term "introduction of United States Armed Forces" includes the assignment of members of such armed forces to command, coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military forces of any foreign country or government when such military forces are engaged, or there exists an imminent threat that such forces will become engaged, in hostilities.

#### (d) Constitutional authorities or existing treaties unaffected; construction against grant of Presidential authority respecting use of United States Armed Forces

Nothing in this chapter—

(1) is intended to alter the constitutional authority of the Congress or of the President, or the provisions of existing treaties; or

(2) shall be construed as granting any authority to the President with respect to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances which authority he would not have had in the absence of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–148, §8, Nov. 7, 1973, 87 Stat. 558.)
### §8455. Recovery; restoration of earning capacity

(a)(1) If an annuitant receiving a disability retirement annuity from the Fund recovers from the disability before becoming 60 years of age, payment of the annuity terminates on reemployment by the Government or 1 year after the date on which the Office determines that the annuitant has recovered, whichever is earlier.

(2) If an annuitant receiving a disability annuity from the Fund, before becoming 60 years of age, is restored to an earning capacity fairly comparable to the current rate of pay of the position occupied at the time of retirement, payment of the annuity terminates 180 days after the end of the calendar year in which earning capacity is so restored. Earning capacity is deemed restored if in any calendar year the income of the annuitant from wages or self-employment or both equals at least 80 percent of the current rate of pay of the position occupied immediately before retirement.

(b)(1) If an annuitant whose annuity is terminated under subsection (a) is not reemployed in a position in which that individual is subject to this chapter, such individual is deemed, except for service credit, to have been involuntarily separated from the service for the purpose of subchapter II of this chapter as of the date of termination of the disability annuity, and after that termination is entitled to annuity under the applicable provisions of such subchapter.

(2) If an annuitant whose annuity is terminated under subsection (a)(2)—

(A) is not reemployed in a position subject to this chapter; and

(B) has not recovered from the disability for which that individual was retired;

the annuity of such individual shall be restored at the applicable rate under section 8452 effective the first of the year following any calendar year in which such individual's income from wages or self-employment or both is less than 80 percent of the current rate of pay of the position occupied immediately before retirement.

(3) If an annuitant whose annuity is terminated because of a medical finding that the individual has recovered from disability is not reemployed in a position in which such individual is subject to this chapter, the annuity of such individual shall be restored at the applicable rate under section 8452 effective from the date on which the Office determines that there has been a recurrence of the disability.

(4) Paragraphs (2) and (3) shall not apply in the case of an annuitant receiving an annuity from the Fund under subchapter II of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 99–335, title I, §101(a), June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 568.)
---

---

Exhibit 14(a)(1)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Registration No. 33-34233, Registration
No. 33-46861, Registration No. 33-87614, Registration No. 33-97622, Registration No.
33-97624 and Registration No. 33-39364), of our reports dated June 30, 2008, relating to
the consolidated financial statements of Scailex Corporation Ltd. (the
Company) and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in this Report on Form 20-F of Scailex Corporation Ltd.

/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.Brightman Almagor & Co.
A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Tel Aviv, Israel
June 30, 2008



---

---
### **CHAPTER 28—TOBACCO INDUSTRY**