alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wartime Labor Conditions in India

              																	Das, Rajani Kanta, 1881. 						*Wartime Labor Conditions in India : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 755*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1943,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4240,			accessed on September 20, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 32.2

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Stanton, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Financial OfficerNovember 16, 2010
### §1427–1. Quality requirements for Commodity Credit Corporation owned grain

#### (a) Establishment of minimum standards

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall establish minimum quality standards that shall apply to grain that is deposited for storage for the account of the Commodity Credit Corporation. In establishing such standards, the Secretary shall take into consideration factors related to the ability of grain to withstand storage and assurance of acceptable end-use performance.

#### (b) Inspection of grain acquisitions

The Commodity Credit Corporation shall utilize Federal Grain Inspection Service approved procedures to inspect and evaluate the condition of the grain it acquires from producers. In no case shall this section require the use of an official inspection unless the producer so requests.

(Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title IV, §407A, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XX, §2012, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3933.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Inapplicability of Section

Section inapplicable to 2014 through 2018 crops of covered commodities, cotton, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Feb. 7, 2014, through Dec. 31, 2018, see section 9092(b)(10) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2008 through 2012 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning June 18, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2012, see section 8782(b)(10) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2002 through 2007 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning May 13, 2002, through Dec. 31, 2007, see section 7992(b)(10) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 1996 through 2002 crops of loan commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Apr. 4, 1996, and ending Dec. 31, 2002, see section 7301(b)(1)(J) of this title.
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

MEMORANDUM

TO: Adam Schott

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

By the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20

U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you the authority to perform the functions and duties vested by

law and other delegations in the position of Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary

Education.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authorities delegated

herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon vacancies in the positions of Assistant Secretary for Elementary

and Secondary Education and First Assistant to the position of Assistant Secretary for Elementary

and Secondary Education, if one exists, and certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations

Control Officer. It remains in effect until a nominee is confirmed and sworn into the position of

Assistant Secretary, an acting officer fills the position, or another individual is delegated the

authority to perform the functions and duties of the position, whichever occurs first.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of

certification.

 Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D. (signed)

OGC Clearance and Date: _____7/13/2023_______________

Delegations Officer: Jim Clemmens

Certification Date: 7/14/2023 

Control Number: EA/ES/111
### Devany, Dennis 

## (OSn From: WASHLAND Iwashland@verlzon.net] Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 10:17PM 

### To: Devany, Dennis (OST) Subject: Glinton County EAS

. 

# ...**~,: ',~**  Dear

## M~.**De~any.** Iam the owner ofWashLand Car Wash, Laundry-Mat and AutoLand. I use Plattsburgh Airport for business travel. I believe that the Clinton County legislatures should have chosen Cape Air as the EAS airline for our community. I have flown with Cape Air and they were great. It is often the decision makerbecause they make the connections for many
. flights without long waits and when Ifactor in the total price of myflights, Cape Air rates and schedules help me choose Plattsburgh Airport over Burlington Airport. I have no political involvementin this decision, Ijust want you to know that I have used and will continue to fly out of Plattsburgh Airport as long as Cape Air is in business. Iwill not fly on Colgan Air, not aftertheir reckless safety record and most likely the fewer flights will mean that the connecting flights will be to long of await, so Iwill have to go back to Burlington Airport. Thank you for listening to myconcerns. Respectfully Submitted, Michael R. Racine OwnerWashLand I AutoLand 518-572-7200

1.
Exhibit 32

                                  Certification

           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 of BNP U.S. Funding L.L.C. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Olivier
Meisel, President and Director of the Company, and Thomas Clyne, Chief Financial
Officer and Director of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

             (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
             13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

             (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations
             of the Company.





                                            By /s/ Olivier Meisel
                                            ---------------------
                                            Olivier Meisel
                                            President and Director

                                            By /s/ Thomas Clyne
                                            ---------------------
                                            Thomas Clyne
                                            Chief Financial Officer and Director
Date:   November 12, 2004
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Serologicals
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: March 25, 2003


                                        /s/ Harold W. Ingalls
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Harold W. Ingalls
                                        Vice President, Finance and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
(November 3, 1960)

#### Lillian Harper, as Administratrix of the Estate of June Harper, Deceased, v. Roger Parker et al.

Motion by defendant-appellant Roger Parker for an order permitting him to perfect his appeal upon the record submitted by the codefendant, Selma Parker, and upon typewritten appellant’s points granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the record submitted by the codefendant, Selma Parker, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for respondent and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points with this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
#### Laura Hunt, Respondent, v. Karl E. Schultz, Individually and as Executor of Marie L. Schultz, Deceased, Appellant. (Action No. 1.)

Judgment and orders unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The verdicts in favor of each of these plaintiffs are totally irreconcilable and inconsistent. Contributory negligence is conduct on the part of a plaintiff which falls below the standard to which he should conform for his own protection (Restatement, Torts, § 463). Where, as here, there is one accident and a continuous course of conduct on the part of a driver of a vehicle, a jury determination that that driver violated a duty to another of necessity includes a finding that the same driver violated the duty owed to himself for his own protection. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term in favor of plaintiff in an automobile negligence action; also, appeal from order denying motion for a new trial and appeal from order denying motion under Civ. Prac. Act, § 457-a.) Present—■ Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Veechio, JJ.
### §8111. Additional compensation for services of attendants or vocational rehabilitation

(a) The Secretary of Labor may pay an employee who has been awarded compensation an additional sum of not more than $1,500 a month, as the Secretary considers necessary, when the Secretary finds that the service of an attendant is necessary constantly because the employee is totally blind, or has lost the use of both hands or both feet, or is paralyzed and unable to walk, or because of other disability resulting from the injury making him so helpless as to require constant attendance.

(b) The Secretary may pay an individual undergoing vocational rehabilitation under section 8104 of this title additional compensation necessary for his maintenance, but not to exceed $200 a month.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 539; Pub. L. 90–83, §1(54), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 210; Pub. L. 93–416, §7, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1145; Pub. L. 101–534, §2, Nov. 7, 1990, 104 Stat. 2352.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 756(b). | Oct. 14, 1949, ch. 691, §105 "Sec. 6(b)", 63 Stat. 858. |
| | | Sept. 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–767, §101 (less last 13 words), 74 Stat. 906. |

Statutes at Large

In subsection (a), the words "In addition to the monthly compensation otherwise specified in sections 751–756, 757–871, 783–791, and 793 of this title" are omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (b), the words "pursuant to the Secretary's direction" are omitted as unnecessary.

Administration of this subchapter was transferred to the Secretary of Labor by section 1 of 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 19, 64 Stat. 1271 (see section 8145).

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

| Section of title 5 | Source (U.S.Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8111(a) | 5 App.: 756(b)(1). | July 4, 1966, Pub. L. 89–488, §4(a), 80 Stat. 253. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–534 substituted "$1,500" for "$500".

1974—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 93–416, §7(a), substituted "$500" for "$300".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 93–416, §7(b), substituted "$200" for "$100".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Pub. L. 101–534, §3, Nov. 7, 1990, 104 Stat. 2352, provided that: "The amendment made by section 2 [amending this section] shall take effect October 1, 1990."

#### Effective Date of 1974 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–416 applicable to cases where injury or death occurred prior to Sept. 7, 1974, but only to a period beginning on or after Sept. 7, 1974, see section 28(a) of Pub. L. 93–416, set out as a note under section 8101 of this title.

#### Personnel Not Affected by 1967 Increase

Increases authorized under amendment by section 1(54) of Pub. L. 90–83 not applicable to specified personnel, see section 7 of Pub. L. 90–83, set out as a note under section 8103 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          38,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,370
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,730
<INVENTORY>                                     44,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,569
<PP&E>                                          69,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,458
<BONDS>                                        543,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (333,256)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,244
<SALES>                                        232,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,744
<CGS>                                           74,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               145,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,248)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,976)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,272)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        
 

</TABLE>
§ 770.52 Violations. ( a ) Any person entering or remaining on Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, without the consent of the Commander, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, or an authorized representative, shall be subject to the penalties prescribed by 18 U.S.C. 1382, which provides in pertinent part: Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, goes upon any military, naval * * * reservation, post, fort, arsenal, yard, station or installation, for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation * * * shall be fined not more than $500.00 or imprisoned not more than six months or both.
( b ) Moreover, any person who willfully violates this subpart is subject to a fine not to exceed $5000.00 or imprisonment for not more than one year or both as provided in 50 U.S.C. 797.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         204,748
<SECURITIES>                                 1,268,229
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,521,129
<PP&E>                                          78,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,321,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          186,907
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        94,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,026,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,321,946
<SALES>                                        101,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               289,902
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               173,979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                115,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,567
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             87,356
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 69,613
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   156,969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
#### ESTATE OF DARBY v. MONROE OIL CO.

No. 470P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 301

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 November 1997.
#### STATE v. FOX

No. 521P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 562

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal allowed 5 February 1998.
**Exhibit (32)(a)**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Empire District Electric Company(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),William L. Gipson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **By**                                        | **  /s/  William L. Gipson** |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  William L. Gipson                      |
| Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date:    May 8,2008

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to The Empire District ElectricCompany and will be retained by The Empire District Electric Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
§ 339.4 Departmental review and submission to OIRA. ( a ) After the appropriate FRLO completes his or her initial review, a guidance document will be internally coordinated within the proposing component and formally coordinated throughout the Department with other components who have equities. Mandatory coordinators on all guidance documents are the Chief Management Officer, Department of Defense and the component's General Counsel.
( b ) The proposing component will adjudicate DoD and OSD Component comments and return a final guidance document package to the appropriate DoD or OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer for submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Information and Regulations Affairs (OIRA) for a significance determination.
( c ) Guidance documents deemed by OIRA to be “significant” (see § 339.7 of this part) must be reviewed and approved by the Department's Regulatory Policy Officer before OIRA formally reviews them.
### SUBCHAPTER I—FINDINGS, PURPOSES, AND DEFINITIONS
ALASKA SEAFOOD CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0652

DCN: 00213CBI

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.