alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1904. Methods research; designation of methods

In furtherance of the policy expressed herein the Secretary is authorized and directed—

(a) to conduct, assist, and foster research, investigation, and experimentation to develop and determine methods of slaughter and the handling of livestock in connection with slaughter which are practicable with reference to the speed and scope of slaughtering operations and humane with reference to other existing methods and then current scientific knowledge; and

(b) on or before March 1, 1959, and at such times thereafter as he deems advisable, to designate methods of slaughter and of handling in connection with slaughter which, with respect to each species of livestock, conform to the policy stated in this chapter. If he deems it more effective, the Secretary may make any such designation by designating methods which are not in conformity with such policy. Designations by the Secretary subsequent to March 1, 1959, shall become effective 180 days after their publication in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 85–765, §4, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 863; Pub. L. 95–445, §5(b)–(e), Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1069.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Par. (a). Pub. L. 95–445, §5(d), inserted "and" after the semicolon at end.

Par. (b). Pub. L. 95–445, §5(c), (e), struck out "for purposes of section 1903 of this title" before "180 days", and substituted a period for the semicolon at end.

Par. (c). Pub. L. 95–445, §5(b), repealed par. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–445 effective one year after Oct. 10, 1978, and nonapplicability during not to exceed additional 18 months in hardship cases, see sec. 7 of Pub. L. 95–445 set out as a note under section 603 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.
### §1981b. Farm loan interest rates

Any loan for farm ownership purposes under subchapter I of this chapter, farm operating purposes under subchapter II of this chapter, or disaster emergency purposes under subchapter III of this chapter, other than a guaranteed loan, that is deferred, consolidated, rescheduled, or reamortized under this chapter shall, notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, bear interest on the balance of the original loan and for the term of the original loan at a rate that is the lowest of—

(1) the rate of interest on the original loan;

(2) the rate being charged by the Secretary for loans, other than guaranteed loans, of the same type at the time at which the borrower applies for a deferral, consolidation, rescheduling, or reamortization; or

(3) the rate being charged by the Secretary for loans, other than guaranteed loans, of the same type at the time of the deferral, consolidation, rescheduling, or reamortization.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §331B, as added Pub. L. 98–258, title VI, §605, Apr. 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 139; amended Pub. L. 107–171, title V, §5305, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 345.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–171 substituted "lowest of—" for "lower of", realigned margins for pars., substituted "original loan;" for "original loan or (2) the", added par. (2), and redesignated former par. (2) as (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Adjustment of Interest Rates

Pub. L. 100–71, title I, July 11, 1987, 101 Stat. 428, provided that: "The Secretary may adjust interest rates on existing nonsubsidized loans if he determines such interest rates are excessive in relation to prevailing commercial rates for comparable loans: Provided, That such rate adjustments shall constitute a change in the loan agreement and not a new loan."
### Nonmarine sedimentary rocks of Tertiary age in the Lake Mead region, southeastern Nevada and northwestern Arizona

By: Robert G. Bohannon

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1259

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 15.2

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-111310) pertaining to the Employees’ Stock Option Plans of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. of our report dated March 12, 2003, except as to note 7(d)6 which is dated March 10, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. included in the  Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

|                          |   |   |                                                                         |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Tel-Aviv, IsraelJuly 12, 2005 |   |   | /s/ Luboshitz KasiererAn affiliate member of Ernst & Young International |
|                          |   |   |                                                                         |

 

----
Gischia, Scott

From:

Sent:

To: Cc:

Subject:

Beth Havlik [bhavlik@barr.com]

Wednesday, January 10, 2007 1:56PM

Gischia, Scott

George Pruchnofski

SO2 Scrubber Costs

We looked into the question from MCPA inquiring about the SO2 scrubber calculations, specifically referring to the "SO2

Scrubber Scale" sheet. The calculations in the "SO2 Scrubber Scale" sheet take a vendor quotation for SO2 scrubber

equipment and scales the costs for each stack based on the specific scrubber flue gas flow rate. The SO2 scrubber

equipment costs are then used to calculate the installed capital costs for the SO2 scrubbers.

MPCA's question pertained to the use of a 15% increase in the actual flue gas flow rate (to represent maximum flue gas

flow rate for design cost estimate purposes) and the division of the flow rate by 0.85 in the scaling calculation. They

asked if this factor was "double counted." Barr has reviewed the calculations and our supporting documentation and we

have concluded that we did double count the 15% by mistake.

Barr has recalculated the costs removing the double-counting. The results for your facility are summarized in the table

below. As illustrated in the table, the change in the calculations decreases the pollution control cost ($/ton) by

approximately 5%. This change would have no impact on the conclusions of the report.

Furnace 11 Hood Exhaust

Pollution Control Cost ($/ton

Previous Cost Difference

Corrected

Cost

$139,872 $132,924 5.0%

Furnace 11 Waste Gas $384,034 $365,347 4.9%

Furnace 12 Hood Exhaust $152,149 $144,592 5.0%

Furnace 12 Waste Gas $417,742 $397,415 4.9%

We apologize for this mistake. We verified that this only affects the SO2 scrubber calculations and no other control

equipment.

Please call me if you have any additional questions or comments as MPCA continues its review.

Beth T. Havlik, P.E.

Vice President, Barr Engineering

4700 West 77th Street

Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803

800/632-2277 toll free

952/832-2640 phone

952/832-2601 fax

734/255-0269 mobile

bhavlikbarr.com

1
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Earnings and Hours in the Leather and Leather Belting and Packing Industries, 1939

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Earnings and Hours in the Leather and Leather Belting and Packing Industries, 1939 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 679*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1941,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4181,			accessed on September 8, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# Patent

## Title
Method and apparatus for treating fluent materials

## Abstract

In Example 2 to 8 EHPNA was used as the extractant but similar results may be obtained even if the other extractants in this invention, TMHPNA and IDPNA, are used.

## Background
## Claims

1. A process for separating cobalt from nickel in an aqueous solution containing the above-mentioned metals, .[.with consists.]. .Iadd.consisting .Iaddend.essentially of.Iadd.: .Iaddend. comprising a mono-alkyl alkylphosphonic acid as extractant and having the general formula: ##STR2## wherein R represents 2-ethylhexyl, 3,5,5-trimethylhexyl, or isodecyl, .Iadd.in one or more stages .Iaddend.whereby cobalt is extracted from the aqueous solution into the organic phase, and the aqueous phase.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the said extractant is mono-2-ethylhexyl 2-ethylhexylphosphonic acid, mono-3,5,5-trimethylhexyl, 3,5,5-trimethylhexylphosphonic acid, or monoisodecyl isodecylphosphonic acid, or mixtures thereof.

3. The process of claim 1 wherein the extraction is performed within the pH range of from about 5 to 6.5.

4. The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the organic extraction solvent comprises the said extractant in an amount of from 5 to 100% by volume.

5. The process of claims 1 and 2 wherein the organic extraction solvent comprises the said extractant in an amount of from 10 to 40% by volume.

6. The process of claim 4 wherein the said extractant further comprises an aliphatic hydrocarbon, aromatic hydrocarbon, or mixtures thereof.

7. The process of claims 1 to 3 wherein the organic extraction solvent contains an emulsion inhibitor.

8. The process of claims 1 to 3 wherein the emulsion inhibitor is tributyl phosphate or isodecanol.

9. The process of claims 1 to 3 wherein said cobalt loaded organic phase is scrubbed by contact with (a) diluted inorganic acid or (b) an aqueous solution containing cobalt salt. .Iadd.

10.  The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the extraction is performed by contacting said aqueous solution containing cobalt and nickel with said organic extraction solvent in two stages. .Iaddend. .Iadd.11. The process of claim 10 wherein the pH of said aqueous solution containing cobalt and nickel in the first of said two stages is 4.6. .Iaddend. .Iadd.12. The process of claim 11 wherein the pH of said aqueous solution containing cobalt and nickel in the second of said two stages is 5.8. .Iaddend. .Iadd.13. The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the extraction is performed by contacting said aqueous solution containing cobalt and nickel with said organic extraction solvent in countercurrent extraction in two stages, and .Iaddend. .Iadd.14. The process of claim 1 wherein the extraction is performed within the pH range of from 4.6 to 6.5. .Iaddend.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2003 of EDO Corporation (The
"Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Frederic B. Bassett
------------------------
Frederic B. Bassett
Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2003
### §138h. Regulations

The Secretary shall promulgate regulations to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIII, §1329, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3565.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

      
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         614,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               645,390
<PP&E>                                       2,378,486
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,759,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,268,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,169,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,268,224
<SALES>                                        870,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               889,283
<CGS>                                          662,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  662,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               125,334
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                101,430
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            101,430
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   101,430
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    14.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    14.35
        



</TABLE>
### §2249. Amount and character of cooperation

Unless otherwise provided by the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944 or by other statute, the measure and character of cooperation authorized by said Act on the part of the Federal Government and on the part of the cooperator shall be such as may be prescribed by the Secretary, unless otherwise provided for in the applicable appropriation.

(Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title VII, §711, 58 Stat. 743.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944, referred to in text, is act Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, 58 Stat. 734. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

This section was enacted as part of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944.

Section was formerly classified to section 564a of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
#### § 239.3 Policy.

It is DoD policy, in implementing section 3374 of title 42, United States Code, as amended by section 1001 of the ARRA (Pub. L. 111-5), that those eligible (*see* section 239.6 of this part) to participate in the HAP and Expanded HAP are treated fairly and receive available benefit as quickly as practicable.
#### § 935.101 Seizure of property.

Any property seized in connection with an alleged offense (unless the property is perishable) is retained pending trial in accordance with the orders of the Court. The property must be produced in Court, if practicable. At the termination of the trial, the Court shall restore the property or the funds resulting from the sale of the property to the owner, or make such other proper order as may be required and incorporate its order in the record of the case. Any item used in the commission of the offense, may, upon order of the Court, be forfeited to the United States. All contraband, which includes any item that is illegal for the owner to possess, shall be forfeited to the United States; such forfeiture shall not relieve the owner from whom the item was taken from any costs or liability for the proper disposal of such item.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-104703, 333-60942, 333-59041,
333-59043, 333-47433, 333-09549 and 333-03769 on Form S-8 and Registration Statements No. 333-113953,
333-117551 and 333-120379 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 18, 2005 (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory
paragraphs related to the adoption of EITF 04-08 requiring revision of the 2003 consolidated financial statements and related to the restatement of the 2002 and 2003 consolidated financial
statements) relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Serologicals Corporation and Subsidiaries and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Serologicals Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended January 2, 2005.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta,
Georgia
March 18, 2005

---



QuickLinks
Ryan K. Koffman

12289 Daisy Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 - 1921 April 19, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington DC 20590 Re : Application to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 11314 Regulatory Docket No. FAA- 2014 - 0958

Dear Sir or Madam: By letter dated April 9, 2015 from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) the request for exemption from Section 333 was granted. Th e letter is marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11314 Regulatory Docket No. FAA2014 - 0958. The petitioner, Ryan K. Koffman, requests the granted exemption be amended to include the DJ I S900 and the Bade 350QX. The DJI S900 has a total weight of 8.2Kg or 18.1l bs. The dimensions are 900mm diagonally . The maximum speed is not listed in the aircrafts operating manual (AOM) but will not exceed 50mp h. The S900 has six motors, Motor Model S900 -021 , powered by a 6 - cell 10000mAh or 1 5 0 00mAh Lithium Polymer battery. There are six propellers in use , Propeller Model DJI S900 - 25 . The S900 will be controlled with the Spektrum DX8 remote controller with an operating frequency of 2.400GHz – 2.483GHz. The live video feed will have an operating frequency of 5.728GHz – 5.85 0GHz. The Blade 350QX has a total weight of 24oz or 680g. The dimensions are 18.30 inch (465mm) in length and 5.43inch (138mm) in height with a main rotor diameter of 22.80inch (580mm). The maximum speed is not listed in the AOM but will not exceed 50mp h. The 350QX has four motors, Motor Model BLH7802, powered by a 3 cell 2200mAh or 3000mAh Lithium Polymer battery. There are four propellers, Propeller Model APC LP08038SF and LP08038SFP, in use. The 350QX will be controlled with the Spektrum DX8 remote controller with an operating frequency of 2.400GHZ – 2.4835GHz. The live video feed will have an operating frequency of 5.728GHz – 5.850GHz. The Base Station that will be u tilized is the Neewer 7inch LCD Diversity Receiver Monitor, Model RX- LCD5802. The operating frequency is between 5645MHz – 5945MHz. The Neewer monitor is powered by an integrated 2 cell 2 5 0 0mAh Lithium Polymer battery . Thank you for your understanding. Please feel free to contact me if you have any q uestions regarding this request or need additional information.U.S. Department of Transportation

April 19, 2015 Page 2 Sincerely,

Ryan K. Koffman
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

            Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Duquesne Light
Company for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Victor A. Roque, as
President of Duquesne Light Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Duquesne Light Company.

     WITNESS the due execution hereof this 14th day of November, 2002.


                                         /s/ Victor A. Roque
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Victor A. Roque
                                         President (Principal Executive Officer)

     This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Duquesne Light Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.