alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harry R. Curran and Mandel Lowenstine, appellants, v. William Thanos, appellee.

Gen. No. 29,645.

Suit against guarantor of rent of leased premises to recover month’s rent. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William R. Fetzer, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 9, 1925.

Theodore Rubovits, for appellants.

Ralph F. Stern, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 77.206 Ladders; construction; installation and maintenance. ( a ) Ladders shall be of substantial construction and maintained in good condition.
( b ) Wooden members of ladders shall not be painted.
( c ) Steep or vertical ladders which are used regularly at fixed locations shall be anchored securely and provided with backguards extending from a point not more than 7 feet from the bottom of the ladder to the top of the ladder.
( d ) Fixed ladders shall not incline backwards at any point unless provided with backguards.
( e ) Fixed ladders shall be anchored securely and installed to provide at least 3 inches of toe clearance.
( f ) Fixed ladders shall project at least 3 feet above landings, or substantial handholds shall be provided above the landings.
#### § 37.870 Should I require recipients to mark documents related to inventions?

To protect the recipient's interest in inventions, your TIA should require the recipient to mark documents disclosing inventions it desires to protect by obtaining a patent. The recipient should mark the documents with a legend identifying them as intellectual property subject to public release or public disclosure restrictions, as provided in 35 U.S.C. 205.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSurface settling in partially filled containers upon step reduction in gravityA large literature exists concerning the equilibrium configurations of free liquid/gas surfaces in reduced gravity environments. Such conditions generally yield surfaces of constant curvature meeting the container wall at a particular (contact) angle. The time required to reach and stabilize about this configuration is less studied for the case of sudden changes in gravity level, e.g. from normal- to low-gravity, as can occur in many drop tower experiments. The particular interest here was to determine the total reorientation time for such surfaces in cylinders (mainly), as a function primarily of contact angle and kinematic viscosity, in order to aid in the development of drop tower experiment design. A large parametric range of tests were performed and, based on an accompanying scale analysis, the complete data set was correlated. The results of other investigations are included for comparison.Document ID19910005243Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsWeislogel, Marl M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Ross, Howard D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1990Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberE-4998NASA-TM-103641NAS 1.15:103641Accession Number91N14556Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 674-24-05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910005243.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                       993
<INVENTORY>                                     26,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,540
<PP&E>                                         190,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,191
<BONDS>                                         33,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,326
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,904
<SALES>                                        157,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,067
<CGS>                                          116,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  136,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,605
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,401
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (4,340)
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,864
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C
.
Essentia l Ai r

Servic e at Bradford , Pennsylvani a Franklin/Oi l City , Pennsylvani a DuBois , Pennsylvani a Jamestown , Ne w Yor k Under 4 9 U.S.C
. §4173 1 e t

seq . DOT-OST-2003-1452 8 DOT-OST-1997-252 3 DOT-OST-2004-1761 7 DOT-OST-2003-1495 0

REOUES T FO RSUBMISSIO N DEADLIN E EXTENTIO N B Y GULFSTREA M INTERNATIONA L AIRLINE S Correspondenc e with regar dt o thi s documen t shoul db e addresse dto : Micke y Bowma n Vic e Presiden t

o f Corporat e Developmen t GulfstreamInternationa l Airline s 320 1 Griffi n Road , 4' ^ Floo r Ft
. Lauderdale , F L 3331 2 Telephone : 270-689-218 0 Fax : 270-689-218 0 GulfstreamInternationa l Airline s ("Gulfstream" ) respectfull y request s a n eigh t day extensio n of

th e submissio n deadlin e dat e of Jun e 22 , 201 0 a s se t

b y th e Departmen t

of Transportatio n i n its ' solicitatio n o f carrie r proposal s i n th e abov e mentione dcities
. Th e resultin g deadlin e dat e woul db e Jun e 30 , 2010
. Th e requeste dextensio n woul dsyn c thi s dat e with th e pendin g submissio n deadlin e dat e for th e communitie s o f

Massena , Watertow n an dOgdensburg , NY
. Gulfstrea mi s currentl y workin g o n severa l servic e option s that

woul dessentiall y interweav e th e tw o solicitations
. W e believ e th e resultin g servic e pattern s wil l produc e schedule s that severa l communitie s hav e requested
. Gulfstreami s seekin g additio n rout e approval s with it s cod e shar e partner s that woul d mak e thes e option s mor e desirabl e t o th e communitie s involved.
. W e hav e polle dth e airport manager s for

th e four communitie s an dthe y hav e expresse d thei r support i n thi s extension
. Submitted : Jun e 16 , 201 0Micke y Bowma n

Vic e Presiden t

o f Corporat e Developmen t Gulfstrea mInternationa l Airline s
§ 564.39 Medical care benefits. ( a ) A member of the ARNG who incurs a disease or injury under the conditions enumerated herein is entitled to medical care, in a hospital or at his/her home, appropriate for the treatment of his/her disease or injury until the resulting disability cannot be materially improved by further medical care.
( b ) If it is determined that the disease or injury was directly related to authorized activities surrounding the care of the original disease or injury, medical care may be continued in the same manner as if it had occurred during the training period.
( c ) When members who incur a disease or an injury during a period of training or duty under title 32, U.S.C. 503, 504, 505, or 502f are admitted to an Army medical treatment facility, and it appears that a finding of “not in line of duty” may be appropriate, a formal line of duty investigation should be promptly conducted, and a copy of the report furnished the treatment facility. If these findings result in a “not in line of duty” determination prior to the date the training is terminated, every effort should be made to assist the hospital concerned in disposing of the patient from the hospital by the date the training is terminated or as soon thereafter as he/she becomes transportable. Medical care furnished such member after the termination of the period of training is not authorized at Army expense unless the “not in line of duty” determination is ultimately reversed. The individual may be furnished medical care at Army expense from the date the training is terminated to the date the member receives notification of this action. Medical care received subsequent to the member's receipt of such notification is not authorized at Army expense. In the event a line of duty investigation has not been made by the date the training is terminated, every effort will be made to arrive at a determination as soon thereafter as possible.
(32 U.S.C. 318-320 and 502-505)
### §1765. Foreign service appropriations; applicability

Provisions in annual appropriation Acts of the Department of State facilitating the work of the Foreign Service of the United States shall be applicable under rules and regulations prescribed by the President or his designee to activities pursuant to this subchapter.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title VI, §605, 68 Stat. 909; Pub. L. 95–501, title III, §301(4), Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1688.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–501 substituted "this subchapter" for "this chapter".
#### Bernard Waldman, Respondent, v. Cedar Management Corp., Appellant.

Order unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, so as to dismiss the complaint unconditionally, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and judgment directed to be entered in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint, with costs. Counsel’s explanation of the three years and nine-months’ delay in bringing the ease on for trial due to the failure of trial counsel to act diligently does not satisfy the requirements of reasonableness called for under section 181 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice *(Moshman*v. *City of New York,*3 A D 2d 825; *Mist*v. *234 East 33rd Corp.,*4 A D 2d 867; *Hardware Mat. Cas. Go.*v. *Rosenberg,*3 A D 2d 988; *Hyde S' Sons*v. *Roller Derby Skate Co.,*1 A D 2d 942; *Davis*v. *Cunará Steamship Co., 284*App. Div. .1036; *Cooper*v. *Schnabolk,*283 App. Div. 937). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
### §1741. Maximum and minimum quantities for set-aside; "commodity set-aside" defined

The Commodity Credit Corporation shall, as rapidly as the Secretary of Agriculture shall determine to be practicable, set aside within its inventories not more than the following maximum quantities and not less than the following minimum quantities of agricultural commodities or products thereof heretofore or hereafter acquired by it from 1954 and prior years' crops and production in connection with its price support operations:

| Commodity | Maximum quantity | Minimum quantity |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Wheat (bushels) | 500,000,000 | 400,000,000 |
| Upland cotton (bales) | 4,000,000 | 3,000,000 |
| Cottonseed oil (pounds) | 500,000,000 | 0 |
| Butter (pounds) | 200,000,000 | 0 |
| Nonfat dry milk solids (pounds) | 300,000,000 | 0 |
| Cheese (pounds) | 150,000,000 | 0 |

Such quantities shall be known as the "commodity set-aside".

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title I, §101, 68 Stat. 897.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Act Aug. 28, 1954, enacting sections 397, 1446b and 1446c of this title, this chapter, chapters 43 and 44 of this title, and section 590h–3 of Title 16, Conservation, and amending sections 602, 608c, 608e–1, 1301, 1326–1330, 1332, 1334–1335, 1340, 1344, 1371, 1374, 1421, 1428, 1441, 1446, 1446d of this title and sections 590h and 590o of Title 16, Conservation, is popularly known as the "Agricultural Act of 1954".
#### § 552.115 Applicability.

This regulation is applicable to all Active Army, Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC), U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), and Army National Guard (ARNG) units training and/or assigned/attached to Fort Lewis and its sub-installations. This regulation also applies to tenant units/activities stationed on Fort Lewis. It is also applicable to all persons, both military and civilian, who reside on or who otherwise enter Fort Lewis Military Reservation for whatever reason.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2002, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                              /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Greg G. Gruber
                                              Senior Vice President,
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              and Treasurer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

                                              November 14, 2002
§ 516.70 Policy. ( a ) DA policy follows: ( 1 ) Civilian personnel actions taken by management officials, civilian and military, will conform to laws and regulations implementing established merit system principles and will be free of any prohibited personnel practices.
( 2 ) Management officials will take vigorous corrective action when prohibited personnel practices occur. Disciplinary measures under AR 690-700, Chapter 751, may be initiated after consultation and coordination with appropriate civilian personnel office and labor counselor.
( b ) DA activities will cooperate with OSC in the following ways: ( 1 ) Promoting merit system principles in civilian employment programs within DA.
( 2 ) Investigating and reporting allegations of improper or illegal conduct forwarded to the activity by HQDA.
( 3 ) Facilitating orderly investigations by the OSC of alleged prohibited personnel practices and other matters assigned for investigation to the OSC, such as violations of the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, the Freedom of Information Act, or the Hatch Act.
§ 635.11 Release of information under the Privacy Act of 1974. ( a ) Military police records may be released according to provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, as implemented by 32 CFR part 310, DoD Privacy Program, 32 CFR part 505, The Army Privacy Program, and this part.
( b ) The release and denial authorities for all Privacy Act cases concerning military police records are provided in § 635.9.
( c ) Privacy Act requests for access to a record, when the requester is the subject of that record, will be processed as prescribed in 32 CFR part 505.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReview and synthesis of problems and directions for large scale geographic information system developmentProblems and directions for large scale geographic information system development were reviewed and the general problems associated with automated geographic information systems and spatial data handling were addressed.Document ID19840011920Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBoyle, A. R.*(Environmental Systems Research Inst. Redlands, CA, United States)*Dangermond, J.*(Environmental Systems Research Inst. Redlands, CA, United States)*Marble, D.*(Environmental Systems Research Inst. Redlands, CA, United States)*Simonett, D. S.*(Environmental Systems Research Inst. Redlands, CA, United States)*Tomlinson, R. F.*(Environmental Systems Research Inst. Redlands, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1983Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:166563NASA-CR-166563Accession Number84N19988Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 677-11-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-11346Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840011920.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### APPALACHIAN OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. v. TOWN OF BOONE BD. OF ADJUST.

No. 615P97

Case below: 128 N.C.App. 137

Petition by respondent for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
### §2214. General Counsel; appointment

(a) The President shall appoint on and after July 31, 1956, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, a General Counsel of the Department of Agriculture.

(b) The existing office of General Counsel of the Department of Agriculture shall be abolished effective upon the appointment and qualification of the General Counsel provided for by subsection (a) or April 1, 1957, whichever is earlier.

(July 31, 1956, ch. 804, title III, §301, 70 Stat. 742.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on that part of section 301 of act July 31, 1956, relating to the General Counsel of the Department of Agriculture. That part of such section 301 relating to the General Counsel of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare [now Health and Human Services], is classified to section 3504 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. That part of such section 301 relating to the General Counsel of the Post Office Department was enacted as section 307 of Title 39 by Pub. L. 86–682, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 580. Such provisions were eliminated from Title 39 by the Postal Reorganization Act, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 719.

Section was formerly classified to section 518a of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
1

The Honorable Richard H. Battey, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1924

___________

Gregory Alan Miles, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

South Dakota Department of Social * District of South Dakota.

Services, Office of Child Support *

Enforcement; United States Department *

of Health and Human Services, * [UNPUBLISLHED]

Administration for Children and *

Families; Pamela Jean Miles, Client of *

South Dakota Office of Child Support, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: July 16, 2003

 Filed: July 25, 2003

___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Alan Miles appeals from the district court’s1

 preservice dismissal of

his civil complaint. Having reviewed the record de novo, see Moore v. Sims, 200
-2-

F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude that the district court

properly dismissed Miles’s claims because the South Dakota Department of Social

Services and the United States Department of Health & Human Services enjoy

sovereign immunity, and Miles’s claims against the third defendant (his ex-wife) are

not properly brought in federal court.

Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal, but we modify it to reflect that the

dismissal is without prejudice to any remedies Miles might have in state court or

under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

We also deny the pending motion for a hearing.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Johanna Dugan *vs.*St. Paul & Duluth Railroad Company.

May 31, 1889.

Railway — Negligent Blowing of Whistle — Reading.—Complaint *held*sufficient to show on its face that the alleged wrongful act of the defendant was the proximate cau'se of the injury complained of.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, *Stearns,*J., presiding, overruling its demurrer to the complaint. . The complaint alleges the wrongful blowing of a locomotive whistle by one of defendant’s engineers near the crossing of First and St. Croix avenues in the city of Duluth, in violation of an ordinance of that city; that the whistle was blown “negligently,' recklessly, and wantonly with a frightful noise;” that a team of horses standing in First avenue, in charge of a driver, was so frightened by the sound as to become unmanageable and run away; and - that the plaintiff was struck and knocked down by the runaway team on St. Croix avenue, and sustained the injuries for which the action is brought.

*Ensign, Gash é Williams,*for appellant.

*Edson, Warner é Hanks,*for respondent.

Vanderburgh, J.

The only question in the case is whether' the injury for which plaintiff seeks to recover is shown by the complaint to be the natural and proximate result of the alleged wrongful act of the defendant. Though it is not directly alleged that the accident was caused thereby, we think it is clearly implied, and the complaint, though subject to some criticism, is not demurrable. The proof of the facts stated would support a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. It appears that the defendant was responsible for the runaway, and that the team which was frightened .by the blowing of the locomotive whis*545tie became unmanageable, and ran over the plaintiff on the same street, without her fault or that of the driver, who could not control it. The statement of facts shows a direct connection between the wrongful act of the defendant and the injury to the plaintiff as the effect thereof. *Campbell*v. *City of Stillwater,*32 Minn. 308, (20 N. W. Rep. 320;) *Bott v. Pratt,*33 Minn. 323, (23 N. W. Rep. 237;) *Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.*v. *Kellogg,*94 U. S. 469.

Order affirmed.