alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of Quixote Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), each of the officers
of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officers knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                             
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
  Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

|      |              |  |                                            | 
|----- | ------------ |  | ------------------------------------------ | 
|Date: | May 11, 2009 |  | /s/ BRUCE
  REIMER                         | 
|      |              |  |                                           
|      |              |  | Bruce
  Reimer, Chief Executive Officer   
|      |              |  |                                            | 
|Date: | May 11, 2009 |  | /s/ DANIEL
  P. GOREY                      | 
|      |              |  |                                           
|      |              |  | Daniel P.
  Gorey, Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure.



---
### §2911. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter. Sums appropriated to carry out this chapter shall not be available for payment of the expenses or expenditures of the Board or the Committee in administering any provisions of the order issued under section 2903(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 94–294, §12, May 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 535; Pub. L. 99–198, title XVI, §1601(b), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1606.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–198 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to authorization of appropriations for provisions relating to refund of assessment from Beef Board.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–198 effective Jan. 1, 1986, see section 1601(c) of Pub. L. 99–198, set out as a note under section 2901 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Monbro Sanitation Service, Inc., Appellant, v. Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Manorhaven et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to annul the determination of the respondent Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Manorhaven, awarding a garbage removal contract to the respondent Donno & Company, Inc., whose bid for such contract was higher than petitioner’s bid, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 26, 1962 after a hearing, which denied its application and dismissed the proceeding. Order affirmed, with costs. On the record before us, it cannot be said that the respondent Board of Trustees acted arbitrarily in making the award *(Matter of Kaelber*v. *651Salim, 281 App. Div. 980, affd. 305 N. Y. 858). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL NUTRITION MONITORING ADVISORY COUNCIL
EXHIBIT
32.2





Section
1350 Certification


By
Principal Financial Officer





I,
Craig R. Jones, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Rent Corporation (the “Company”) for
the quarter ended November 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon
request.





Date:  December
18, 2009





/s/
      Craig R. JonesCraig
      R. Jones
                Chief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<LEGEND>

                              EAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                   EXHIBIT 27

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X

The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  financial statements for the three months ended April 30, 2000 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               jan-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                    apr-30-2000
<CASH>                                  487,789
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           183,063
<ALLOWANCES>                            20,000
<INVENTORY>                             95,449
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        864,248
<PP&E>                                  457,254
<DEPRECIATION>                          206,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,324,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   444,342
<BONDS>                                 332,685
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                289,282
<OTHER-SE>                              258,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,324,518
<SALES>                                 376,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        376,013
<CGS>                                   242,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           242,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        180,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (29,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (29,148)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (29,148)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.01)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Howard  Pinsley,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.       The report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2008


                                                  /s/ Howard Pinsley
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Howard Pinsley, President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                       15
#### STATE v. FLOWERS

No. 553A94

Case below: Rowan County Superior Court

Motion by defendant (Flowers) to withdraw request to dismiss counsel and drop appeal allowed 24 September 1997 and court’s order of remand for an evidentiary hearing withdrawn. Motion by defendant (Flowers) to stay mandate and vacate opinion denied 24 September 1997.
#### Ida Vorman, appellee, v. City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,020.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in falling upon a sidewalk. Judgment for the plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John J. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Thomson, J., dissenting.

Opinion filed February 11, 1925.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Francis X. Busch, Corporation Counsel, and John J. Kelly, City Attorney, for appellant; Daniel V. Gallery, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel.

Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as
an officer of Handleman Company (the Registrant) that the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                 
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 30, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen Strome                                              
|                    |  |  |  | STEPHEN STROME Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                       
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 30, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas C. Braum, Jr.                                              
|                    |  |  |  | THOMAS C. BRAUM, JR. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



These certifications are not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Registrant specifically
incorporates it by reference.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of Inspector General

The Inspector General

MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Inspector General for Audit

Assistant Inspector General for Investigation

Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology

 Audits and Computer Crime Investigations

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection, and

 Management Services

FROM: Inspector General

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Enter Into Contracts and Other Agreements for 

Audits

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 3(a) of the Inspector General Act of 

1978, as amended (the Act), 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3, I hereby delegate to you, your 

successor in function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the 

authority under Section 6(a)(9) of the Act to enter into contracts and other 

arrangements for audits, studies, analyses, and other services as necessary to carry 

out the Office of Inspector General’s responsibilities relating to Department of 

Education’s programs and operations.

II. RESERVATION

The authority for obligation of OIG funds for such agreements is reserved to the 

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection, and Management Services.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.
IV. CERTIFICATE AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

authority.

___________/s/_______________ 

 John P. Higgins, Jr.

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 8/3/2004

Certified Date: 8/3/2004

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control No.: EF/EFB/162
**Exhibit (32)(b)**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Empire District Electric Company(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Gregory A. Knapp, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **By** | ** /s/  Gregory A. Knapp**                       | ** ** |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Name:  | Gregory  A. Knapp                                     |
| Title: | Vice President -  Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |
| Date:  | November  7, 2007                                     |
|        |                                                       |            |  |  |  |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to The Empire District Electric Companyand will be retained by The Empire District Electric Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
### §§2007 to 2007e. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §701, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1108

Section 2007, Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2310, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3982, related to general provisions for programs under former sections 2007a to 2007e and 2008 to 2008c of this title, including applications, selection of States, duration of projects, and effective dates.

Section 2007a, Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2311, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3982; Pub. L. 102–237, title VII, §702(b), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1880, defined terms for purposes of former sections 2007a to 2007e of this title.

Section 2007b, Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2312, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3984, related to establishment and powers of Rural Partnerships Investment Board.

Section 2007c, Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2313, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3986; Pub. L. 102–237, title VII, §702(c), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1880, established Rural Business Investment Fund.

Section 2007d, Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2314, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3991; Pub. L. 102–237, title VII, §702(d), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1880, related to establishment of local revolving funds.

Section 2007e, Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2315, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3994; Pub. L. 102–237, title VII, §702(e), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1880, related to compliance with and enforcement of former sections 2007a to 2007e of this title and regulations promulgated thereunder.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated March 22, 2002, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the 2001 Annual Report of TeraForce Technology
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference of said report in the following registration
statements:

     Form S-3, File No. 333-58970, filed April 13, 2001;
     Form S-8, File No. 333-65860, filed July 25, 2001.



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 12, 2002
EX-4.1 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN 1



 








Exhibit 4.1




MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

2003 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ STOCK OPTION PLAN

AMENDMENT No. 1




dated as of August 9, 2005




     WHEREAS, Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) to secure for the Company and its
shareholders the benefits of the incentive inherent in increased common stock ownership by members
of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) who are not also employees of the Company or any
of its subsidiaries (“Non-Employee Directors”);



     WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 7 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board (the
“Committee”) may amend the Plan provided that any amendment that would (i) materially increase the
aggregate number of shares which may be issued under the Plan, (ii) materially increase the
benefits accruing to Non-Employee Directors under the Plan, or (iii) materially modify the
requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan, shall be subject to the approval of
the Company’s shareholders; and



     WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares of
Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan from 90,000 (formerly
60,000, retroactively adjusted for the three-for-two stock split
effective October 31, 2003) to 140,000.



     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to and in exercise of the authority retained by the Committee under
Section 20 of the Plan, subject to ratification by the shareholders of the Company, the Plan is
hereby amended, effective August 9, 2005, to provide as follows:


1. The first sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting “60,000” and inserting
“140,000” in its place.



2. The Plan, except as otherwise set forth herein, shall remain in full force and effect in all
other respects.




Date approved by



Compensation
Committee — June 8, 2005

Shareholders — August 9, 2005




III-1
NIIK E ROGER S Su n Countr ySlo t Exemptio n Docket * FAA-2012-008 9 COMMITTEE S PERMANEN TSELEC TCOMMITTE E O N BT H DJSTBiCr , Mn-fiif * INTELLIGENC E ENERG YAN D COMMERC E 

# "'-~S?"^^ " Congreg

g o f tlje Winitt t ^mt i '^z r .rZ^r'sTl? ! l^msi t of Jveprt£ftntatibej ( '^'-"r.^HXT^^r.r"'^' ' LAN^Si°«9i

5 SffilajrtjinBton, 5IB C 20515-220 8 (5171702-800 0 - ^ " (S17)7D2-a642FA) i (fl77)333-MIK E TOL L Fnt r .fffff t m)>«rog« n hou w no v Januar y 23,201 2 Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d Secretar y Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Miche l Huert a" ^ Actin g Administrato r Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 Re : Su nCountr y Airlin e I writ e thi s Lette

r toda y regardin g m y concern s wit hth e recen t cour t decisio nt o rescin d th e Washington-Rega nNationa l slo t fro mSu nCoimtr y Airlines . Las t yea r I full y supporte dSu nCountry' s effort t o obtai nth e first

connectio nbetwee n Michigan' s capita l cit y an dou r nation' s capitol . Th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT ) approve dthei r

applicatio nwhic hfulfille dth e specifi c parameter s DO T sough t t o fill th e slot . Sinc e tha t time , th e Lansin g Airpor t Authorit y ha s investe dove r $300,00 0 advertisin g th e rout e a s wel l a s makin g update s t o thei r &cility . Th e fligh t

ha s carrie dove r

48,00 0 passenger s t o Washington , D C an dha s provide d$1. 2 millio ni nadde drevenu e t o th e airpor t authority . Thi s cour t

rulin g goe s beyon dth e Su nCountr y slot . Th e DO T shoul db e abl e t o mak e thes e decision s base do nnee dwithou t interferenc e fro mth e courts . 1 loo k forwar dt o you r

promp t respons e o nho w w e rectif y thi s situation . Sincerely , 1

— . U '•.-;(._)--/ ;

''•'.•-.— ^ W J

Mik e J . Roger s Membe r o f Congres s

PRINTE D O N HECVCLE D PAPE R
§ 651.42 Actions normally requiring an EIS. The following actions normally require an EIS: ( a ) Significant expansion of a military facility or installation.
( b ) Construction of facilities that have a significant effect on wetlands, coastal zones, or other areas of critical environmental concern.
( c ) The disposal of nuclear materials, munitions, explosives, industrial and military chemicals, and other hazardous or toxic substances that have the potential to cause significant environmental impact.
( d ) Land acquisition, leasing, or other actions that may lead to significant changes in land use.
( e ) Realignment or stationing of a brigade or larger table of organization equipment (TOE) unit during peacetime (except where the only significant impacts are socioeconomic, with no significant biophysical environmental impact).
( f ) Training exercises conducted outside the boundaries of an existing military reservation where significant environmental damage might occur.
( g ) Major changes in the mission or facilities either affecting environmentally sensitive resources (see § 651.29(c)) or causing significant environmental impact (see § 651.39).