2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 6-1-2009 

# U SA v . D i al lo P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 07-1299

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C arl s on@l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . Di al lo " (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1266. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/1266NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

___________ N o. 07- 1299

___________ UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. BO UB AC AR DI AL L O,

A ppel l ant

___________ O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e W e ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C . C r i m i nal N o. 06- cr - 00236) D i s t r i ctJ udge: T he H onor abl e A r t hurJ . Schw ab

___________ Subm i t t ed U nderT hi r d C i r cui tL A R 34. 1( a)

M ay22, 2009 B E F O R E : F U E N T E S , JO R D A N , and N Y G A A R D , C i rcui tJudg es. ( Fi l ed: J une 1, 2009)

___________ OPI NI ON O F THE COURT N Y G A A R D , C i r cui tJ udge.

B eca us e ouropi ni on i s w hol l yw i t houtpr ece dent i al val ue, and beca us e the part i es and the D i s t r i ctC our tar e fa m i l i arw i t h i t s oper at i ve fa ct s , w e off er2

onl yan abbr evi at ed r eci t at i on t o expl ai n w hyw e w i l l aff i r m t he or derof the D i s t r i ct C o u rt. D i al l o appea l s t he D i s t r i ctC our t ’ s or derof j udgm entand s ent ence . H e pl eade d gui l t yt o one countof Tra ffi cki ng i n C ount er fei tL abel s A ffi xed t o C opi es of M ot i on Pi ctur es and A udi ovi s ual W or ks . 18 U . S. C . §2318. H e w as s ent ence d att he l ow end of t he advi s or yr ange: ei ght een mont hs ’ i ncar cer at i on; t hr ee y ear s ’ s upervi s ed r el eas e; and, r es t i tut i on of $120, 000. D ur i ng t he i nves t i gat i on D i al l o agr eed t o s peak w i t h t he Feder al B ur eau of I nves t i gat i on, w her e he a dm i t t ed know l edge of t he i l l egal i t yof hi s act i ons . H e cha nged h is in iti a l n o t-g u iltyp lea to g u iltya f ter m a k in g a p lea a g re e m e n t w ith th e g o v e rn m e n t. T he D i s t r i ctC our t , w hi ch pr oper l yhad j ur i s di ct i on, conduct ed the s t andar d pl ea c ol l oquy p rio r to f ili n g th e o rd e r. T h e re is c lea r e v id e n c e th a t D iallo k n o w in g lya n d v o lu n tar ily ent er ed the pl ea. D i al l o’ s appel l at e couns el fi l ed a br i ef pur s uantt o A n d e rs v . C a lif o rn ia , 38 6 U. S. 738 ( 1967) , concl udi ng t hatt her e ar e notanyi s s ues of ar guabl e mer i t . A ft erour i ndepende nti nves t i gat i on of the r ecor d, w e conc l ude thatcouns el has conduct ed a re a s o n a b le re v ie w , a n d w e a g re e th a t th e re a re n o t a n yis s u e s o f a rg u a b le m e ri t. A ccor di ngl y , w e w i l l aff i r m t he or derof the D i s t r i ctC our t , and w e w i l l gr ant c o u n s e l’ s m o tio n to w ith d ra w .