alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2252. Reimbursement of Production and Marketing Administration appropriations for costs of procuring agricultural commodities for nongovernmental agencies or foreign governments

Applicable appropriations available to the Production and Marketing Administration current at the time services are rendered or payment therefore is received may be reimbursed by nongovernmental agencies or foreign governments (by advance credits or reimbursements) for the actual or estimated costs, as determined by the Production and Marketing Administration, incident to procuring agricultural commodities for such nongovernmental agencies or foreign governments.

(Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title IV, §402, 58 Stat. 738; Ex. Ord. No. 9577, June 29, 1945, 10 F.R. 4253.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section was enacted as part of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944.

Section was formerly classified to section 569 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Production and Marketing Administration functions transferred to other units in Department of Agriculture under Secretary's memorandum 1320, supp. 4, of Nov. 2, 1953.

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.

War Food Administration terminated by Ex. Ord. No. 9577, and all functions transferred to Secretary of Agriculture, who established Production and Marketing Administration, under authority of said Ex. Ord. No. 9577, to administer functions of many of marketing and production agencies, including those functions of former War Food Administration.
#### WALKER v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF THE N.C. LOCAL GOV’T. EMP. RET. SYS.

No. 482PA97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 156

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 November 1997.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 07, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0207. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB d/b/a CHRISTIANA TRUST AS TRUSTEE FOR TOORAK REPO SELLER I TRUST v. JDZ INVESTMENTS, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2019CV069986 2020CV072296
§ 845.6 Criteria for the provision of counsel and payment of expenses in civil cases. Requests for provision of counsel and payment of expenses in civil cases may be granted in trial and appellate proceedings in either of the following civil cases: ( a ) Where the act complained of occurred in the performance of official duty; or
( b ) Where the case is considered to have a significant impact upon the relations of US forces with the host country or is considered to involve any other particular US interest. No funds shall be provided under this part in cases where the United States of America is in legal effect the defendant, without prior authorization of the Judge Advocate General.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000758

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

KIA I WAI O WAI ALE ALE, an unincorporated association; FRIENDS OF MAHA ULEPU, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiffs/Appellants-Appellees, v. BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF HAWAI I,

Defendant/Appellee-Appellant, and KAUA I ISLAND UTILITY COOPERATIVE, a domestic cooperative association, Defendant/Appellee-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CCV-22-0000015)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Nakasone, JJ.) Upon consideration of Defendant/Appellee-Appellant Board of Land and Natural Resources' April 8, 2024 Motion to Dismiss Appeal, the papers in support, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed.DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, April 15, 2024. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-23-0000758 15-APR-2024 07:51 AM Dkt. 34 OGMD
# MEMORANDUM

TO:          Addressees

FROM:    The Secretary

SUBJECT:  Delegation of Authority

## I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. §3472, I hereby delegated to you, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, for your respective Principal Office, the authority under 5 U.S.C. Section 3595(b)(3)(B), to file written objections to the Office of Personnel Management, when appropriate, based on your determination that the career Senior Executive Service employees referred failed to meet the technical qualifications for applicable position vacancies.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, legislative amendments to the authorities delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

## II. RESERVATIONS

None.

## III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

## IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegation of this authority.

___________(Signed)___________ 

Richard W. Riley

**OGC Clearance****and Date:**/s/ R. Wexler, 7/12/96

**Certification Date**:  7/31/96

**Certified by Departmental Delegations Control Officer:**/s/ Naty Beetle****

**Control Number**:   EA/EC/185

Addressees and PO Control No.

EA/EB/137 – Deputy Secretary

EA/EC/185 – Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

EA/EE/16 – Under Secretary

EA/EF/83 – Inspector General

EA/EG/79 – General Counsel

EA/EH/69 – Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

EA/EJ/28 - Assistant Secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs

EA/EK/86 - Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs

EA/EL/62 – Chief Financial Officer

EA/EP/244 - Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

EA/ES/54- Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

EA/EV/58 - Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

EA/EI/2 - Chief Information Officer

EA/EN/2 - Chief Operating Officer, Federal Student Aid

EA/EQ/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

EA/ER/1 - Director, Institute of Education Sciences

EA/EU/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
#### ABELS v. RENFRO CORPORATION

No. 397P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 800

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
§ 809a.2 Military responsibility and authority. ( a ) Air Force installation commanders are responsible for protecting personnel and property under their jurisdiction and for maintaining order on installations, to ensure the uninterrupted and successful accomplishment of the Air Force mission.
( b ) Each commander is authorized to grant or deny access to their installations, and to exclude or remove persons whose presence is unauthorized. In excluding or removing persons from the installation, the installation commander must not act in an arbitrary or capricious manner. Their action must be reasonable in relation to their responsibility to protect and to preserve order on the installation and to safeguard persons and property thereon. As far as practicable, they should prescribe by regulation the rules and conditions governing access to their installation.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 541 

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 

to provide for a macadamia tree health initiative, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself and Mr. SCHATZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade 

Act of 1990 to provide for a macadamia tree health 

initiative, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Macadamia Tree 

5 Health Initiative Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MACADAMIA TREE HEALTH INITIATIVE. 

7 Section 1672(d) of the Food, Agriculture, Conserva8 tion, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(d)) is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following: 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 541 IS

1 ‘‘(11) MACADAMIA TREE HEALTH INITIATIVE.— 

2 Research and extension grants may be made under 

3 this section for the purposes of— 

4 ‘‘(A) developing and disseminating science5 based tools and treatments to combat the maca6 damia felted coccid (Eriococcus ironsidei); and 

7 ‘‘(B) establishing an areawide integrated 

8 pest management program in areas affected by, 

9 or areas at risk of being affected by, the maca10 damia felted coccid (Eriococcus ironsidei).’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §1738n. Consultations with Congress

The President shall consult with the appropriate congressional committees on a periodic basis to review the operation of the Facility under this subchapter and the eligibility of countries for benefits from the Facility under this subchapter.

(July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title VI, §615, as added Pub. L. 102–237, title III, §331, Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1858.)
Exhibit 10(iii)(42)

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                    CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION
                       RETIREMENT BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN

      WHEREAS,  Central  Hudson Gas & Electric  Corporation  ("Central  Hudson")
maintains  the  Central  Hudson Gas & Electric  Corporation  Retirement  Benefit
Restoration Plan (the "Plan"); and

      WHEREAS,  Central Hudson desires to amend the Plan to freeze participation
of the Plan and to limit further accruals of the Plan to only the current vested
participants of the Plan.

      NOW,  THEREFORE,  Central  Hudson  hereby  amends the Plan by adding a new
Section 3.09 to the end thereof as set forth below.

            "3.09  "Accrual of Benefits  and  Participation  after  December 31,
      2005":  Effective as of December 31, 2005, the Plan is terminated  with no
      future Benefit payable with respect to any Participant who, as of December
      31,  2005,  is not  vested in a Benefit  under  Article II of the Plan (as
      determined  under the Pension  Plan) and no  employee  of Energy  Group or
      Central  Hudson may become a Participant  in the Plan on or after December
      31, 2005. A Participant who, as of December 31, 2005, has a vested benefit
      under  Article II will not accrue any  additional  Benefit  under the Plan
      after  December 31, 2005 and his Benefit under the Plan will be determined
      as of December 31, 2005, based on the Participant's  Unrestricted  Benefit
      and Maximum Benefit as of December 31, 2005."

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this Amendment has been executed as of this ____ day
of December, 2005.

                                    CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION


                                    By ______________________________________
-^FORT 

DODGE 

Regional Airport 

FORT DODGE REGIONAL AIRPORT 

1639 Nelson Avenue, Suite 2 • Fort Dodge, lA 50501 

515.573.3881 - Ext. 3 • Mairport@fortdodgeiowa.org 

May 3, 2011 

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Wasiiington, D.C. 20590 

RE: ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE COMMENTS 

Order 2011-1-12 Docket DOT-OST-2001-10682 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

o 

•s=r 

The Fort Dodge Airport Commission, City of Fort Dodge, and communities in our "region of Iowa extend our 

support for the proposals submitted by Mesaba Aviation, Inc. d/b/a as Delta Connection and Chautauqua 

Airlines, d/b/a as Frontier. 

The proposal by Mesaba Aviation provides our community with the quality of air service and worldwide 

seamless connectivity. As you know, Mesaba made improvements to our air service in June 2010 by 

providing us with direct flights and a better time schedule. Even though we lost one daily flight in exchange 

for the direct flights, the support for this change was reflected in utilization by our businesses and 

community. Enplanements were up by 50% at the end of 2010 and are up 85% for the first quarter of 2011. 

These increases were attained with only two daily flights compared to three which is reflective to the 

importance of direct service, time of departures/arrivals, and competitive fares. The downside of the 

Mesaba proposal is that it is only for six months and the fact that the SAAB 340 aircraft is being removed 

from their fleet without a similar size aircraft as a replacement. 

Chautauqua Airlines' proposal is also supported by the community due to the overwhelming support for a jet 

aircraft, low airfares to major destinations, and connectivity with full interline agreements with over 20 

airlines. This proposal would also meet the needs of our community. 

Thank you for the opportunity to submit our comments regarding the selection of the EAS carrier. 

Respectfully, 

i. 

Rhonda M. Chambers 

Director of Aviation 

Cc: Mesaba Airlines 

Delta Airlines 

Frontier Airlines 

Senator Charles Grassley 

Senator Tom Harkin 

Congressman Tom Latham 

Airport Commission 

Mayor Matt Bemrich and Council Members. City of Fort Dodge 

City Manager David Fierke 

Iowa Department of Transportation 

Fort Dodge Chamber of Commerce 

Development Corporation of Fort Dodge and Webster County
---

---

Exhibit 8

Scailex Corporation Ltd.  Tel Aviv, Israel52-003180-8
 The Scailex Group of Companies  as at September 29, 2008
 77.1%
 Scailex Vision Ltd.Israel
 Cshell 201(formerly Tech INK, SA)(in liquidation)
 SVA disbursementLLC(USA)
 Kovacs 183SA(in liquidation)
 Kovacs 319SA(in liquidation)
 Scailex VisionInternational Ltd.Israel
 15%
 Jemtex Ink Jet Printing Ltd.Israel
 14.9%
 RealTimeImage Ltd.Israel
 13.2%
 Dor Ventures Israel Ltd.Israel




---

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 We, Jeffrey A. Ludrof, Chief Executive Officer of the Erie Family Life Insurance Company
(Company), and Philip A. Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:  (1)
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period March 31,
2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Jeffrey A. Ludrof 
 
 /s/ Philip A. Garcia 
 April 27, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Erie Family Life Insurance Company and will be retained by Erie Family Life Insurance
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 31
# STATEOFLOUISl~NA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

ENAAS NIKROO MORRISON, INDIVIDUALLYAND IN HER CAPACITYAS PROVISIONAL ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE SUCCESSION OF DORIAN MAXWELL MORRISON
VERSUS
BRITTANYVARNADO ADAMS, TRUSTEE OF THE C&C MORRISON TRUST AFOR THE BENEFIT OF DORIAN M. MORRISON ANDAS TRUSTEE OF TRUST BFOR THE BENEFIT OF JOSEPHINE RHIANNON MORRISON NO. 2023 CW 0066



### MARCH 13, 2023

In Re: Brittany Varnado Adams, Truste~ of the C & C Morrison

Trust A for the benefit of Dorian M. Morrison and as Trustee of Trust B for the Benefit of Josephine Rhiannon Morrison, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 723945.

BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ.

I

WRIT GRANTED. The portion of the trial court's December 6, 2022 judgment denying the peremptory Jxception of no cause of action filed by the defendant, Brittfny Varnado Adams, as Trustee of the C & C Morrison Trust Afor the benefit of Dorian M. Morrison and Trust B for the benefit;: of Josephine Rhiannon Morrison, is reversed. We find the plaintiff, Enaas Nikroo Morrison, fails to state a cause of actiion for reimbursement of money taken from the proceeds of the sale of immovable property to satisfya mortgage securing payment o~ a promissory note that was executed prior to the plaintiff acEepting an inter vivos donation of the subject immovable property. See La. Civ. Code art. 1549. Accordingly, the exception of no cause of action is granted, and the claims of Enaas Nik.roo Morrison against BrittanyVarnadoAdams, as Trustee of the,C & CMorrison Trust A for the benefit of Dorian M. Morrison and Trust B for the benefit of Josephine Rhiannon Morrison, are dismissed with prejudice.

COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERKOF COURT FOR THE COURT MRT WRC CHH
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

# CERTIFICATION

(Certification of CEO of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Annual Report of Scitex Corporation Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Raanan Cohen,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       
          The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 28, 2006

| |  | /s/ Raanan Cohen
Raanan CohenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.64 Definitions. ( a ) *Government installation.* A United States Government facility having fixed boundaries and owned or controlled by the government.
( b ) *Vehicle.* Every mechanical device used as a means of transportation on land.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83695, Nov. 22, 2016]
#### § 202.8 Training RAB members.

Training is not required for RAB members. It may be advisable, however, to provide RAB members with some initial orientation training regarding the purpose and responsibilities of the RAB, familiarization on cleanup technologies, chemicals of concern, and sampling protocols, as well as informing them of the availability of independent technical advice and document review through EPA's Technical Assistant Grant program and DoD's Technical Assistance for Public Participation (TAPP) program, to enable them to fulfill their responsibilities. Training should be site-specific and beneficial to RAB members. The DoD installation may also provide in-house assistance to discuss technical issues. Funding for training activities must be within the scope of administrative support for RABs, as permitted in § 202.12.
### §2461. Appeals

From the decisions made under sections 2404, 2443, 2501, and 2568 of this title appeal may, within sixty days or such further times as the Secretary allows, be taken under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have jurisdiction of any such appeal.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title II, §71, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1550; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §145, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 45; Pub. L. 103–349, §8(d)(1), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3141.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–349 struck out "2502," after "2501,".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have jurisdiction of any such appeal" for "The Court of Customs and Patent Appeals and United States Courts of Appeals shall have jurisdiction, with venue in the case of the latter as stated in section 2343 of title 28".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.