alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2008g. Payment of interest as condition of loan servicing for borrowers

The Secretary may not reschedule or reamortize a loan for a borrower under this chapter who has not requested consideration under section 1981d(e) of this title unless the borrower pays a portion, as determined by the Secretary, of the interest due on the loan.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §372, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VI, §648(a), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1104.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Apr. 4, 1996, see section 663(b) of Pub. L. 104–127, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 1922 of this title.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Inspector General for Audit

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection

and Management Services

Assistant Inspector General for Investigation

Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology Audit

and Computer Crime Investigations

Counsel to the Inspector General

FROM: Inspector General

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority to Request Disclosure of Records Maintained by 

Another Federal Agency

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Secretary, EA/EF/78, 

certified July 22, 1994, I hereby delegate to you and to anyone serving for you in 

an acting capacity, the authority to make written requests for the Office of 

Inspector General (OIG) to another agency or to any instrumentality of the U.S. 

Government for records for a legally authorized OIG civil or criminal law 

enforcement activity, pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, 5 U. S.C. 

§552a(b)(7).

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, future legislative 

amendments to the authority delegated herein are included within the scope of this 

delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS:

 None.

III. REDELEGATION

Upon the written approval of the Inspector General, you may redelegate this 

authority to Deputy Assistant Inspectors General in Headquarters, Regional 

Inspectors General for Audit, and Special Agents in Charge in the field (formerly 

Regional Inspectors General for Investigation).

Page 2 – Redelegation of Authority

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes delegations EF/EFI/79 and 

EF/EFA/80.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees 

prior to the date of certification.

 _________/s/__________ 

John P. Higgins, Jr.

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 7/13/2004

Certified Date: 7/23/2004

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EF/EFA/151
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We have issued our report dated July 30, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the AnnualReport of Handleman Company on Form 10-K for the year ended May 2, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Handleman Company on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-69389, effectiveDecember 21, 1998; File No. 333-72624, effective November 1, 2001; and File No. 333-120485, effective November 15, 2004). 

 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Southfield, Michigan 

 

July 30, 2009
Lexter Kossie#700661

William McConnell Unit

3001 South Emily Drive

fBeeville, Texas 78102

April 26, 2015

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. BOX 12308, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711

RE: WR NOs. 10,978-01 thru 10,978-16

Tr.Ct.NOs. 679887-A thru 679887-K

185th District Court - Harris County

lOfilk-Qi^Ol ,03,0V &&{&>-&

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPBX

APR 29 2fl?5

Dear Clerk:

Recently I have been cited for abuse of the writ. In

order for me to show that the claims I intend to raise in my

subsequent writ are not barred by Sec 4 I am requesting the

docket sheet of all the writs mentioned above with a list of

all of the claims presented in each of those application. With

out a list of all of the claims I cannot show that the claims

I intend to raise have not been raised before in those prior

applications.

Thank you for any consideration given in this matter.

Sincerely,

cc:File Lextai? Kennon Kossie
### §321r. Transfer of equipment during a public health emergency

#### (a) Authorization of transfer of equipment

During a public health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 247d(a) of title 42, the Secretary, at the request of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, may transfer to the Department of Health and Human Services, on a reimbursable basis, excess personal protective equipment or medically necessary equipment in the possession of the Department.

#### (b) Determination by Secretaries

#### (1) In general

In carrying out this section—

(A) before requesting a transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall determine whether the personal protective equipment or medically necessary equipment is otherwise available; and

(B) before initiating a transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary, in consultation with the heads of each component within the Department, shall—

(i) determine whether the personal protective equipment or medically necessary equipment requested to be transferred under subsection (a) is excess equipment; and

(ii) certify that the transfer of the personal protective equipment or medically necessary equipment will not adversely impact the health or safety of officers, employees, or contractors of the Department.

#### (2) Notification

The Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary shall each submit to Congress a notification explaining the determination made under subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, of paragraph (1).

#### (3) Required inventory

#### (A) In general

The Secretary shall—

(i) acting through the Chief Medical Officer of the Department, maintain an inventory of all personal protective equipment and medically necessary equipment in the possession of the Department; and

(ii) make the inventory required under clause (i) available, on a continual basis, to—

(I) the Secretary of Health and Human Services; and

(II) the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives.

#### (B) Form

Each inventory required to be made available under subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title V, §529, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. G, title IX, §70953(f)(2)(A), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1315.)
§ 537.11 Litigation. ( a ) If a tortfeasor or insurer refuses to settle, or if an injured party's attorney improperly withholds funds, the RJA or recovery attorney must consider litigation to protect the interests of the United States. Litigation is particularly appropriate if a particular insurer consistently refuses to settle claims, or if the government's interests are not adequately represented on a claim over $25,000.
( b ) RJAs or recovery attorneys must maintain close contact with local U.S. Attorney's Offices to ensure these offices are willing to initiate litigation on cases.
( c ) In order to directly initiate or intervene in litigation, an RJA or recovery attorney must prepare a litigation report and formally refer the case through the Affirmative Claims Branch, USARCS, and the Litigation Division, OTJAG (as required by AR 27-40, chapter 5), to the U.S. Attorney. While the RJA or recovery attorney, in conjunction with the Litigation Division Torts Branch, should attempt to have the U.S. Attorney's Office initiate litigation at least six months before the expiration of the statute of limitations (SOL), the RJA or recovery attorney may contact USARCS telephonically if SOL problems necessitate quick action on a case. The RJA or recovery attorney should also contact USARCS if a U.S. Attorney is reluctant to pursue an important case. An injured party's attorney may represent the government's interest in litigation without any special coordination.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Van Dyke Smith, Respondent.

Appeal, as limited by the People’s brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme court, Kings County, entered January 5, 1978, as, after a hearing, granted defendant’s motion to suppress certain oral statements made by him after his arrest. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from. In our view, the statements suppressed by Criminal Term were the "fruit” of defendant’s concededly illegal arrest and contemporaneous search and were not, therefore, admissible in evidence against him (see *Brown v Illinois,*422 US 590; *People v Stewart,*41 NY2d 65, 70). *People v Martinez*(37 NY2d 662) is distinguishable on its facts. Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### Julia V. Jenkins, appellee, v. P. H. Houy, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,584.

Motions to set aside judgment by confession and for change of venue. Motions denied. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. David M. Brothers, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Opinion filed April 3, 1925.

Frisch & Frisch, for, appellant; Douglas O. Gregg, of counsel.

George A. MeCorkle and Edward G. Purkhiser, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
### SUBCHAPTER III—RURAL ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
### §1036. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–353, §3(m), Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 774

Section, act Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 897, §4, 64 Stat. 769, related to authorization of Federal Farm Mortgage Corporation to sell and convey its mineral interests.
#### § 37.835 What requirements do I include for program income?

Your TIA should apply the standards of 32 CFR 34.14 for program income that may be generated. Note the need to specify whether the recipient is to have any obligation to the Federal Government with respect to program income generated after the end of the project period (the period, as established in the award document, during which Federal support is provided). Doing so is especially important if the TIA includes a provision for the recipient to return any amounts to the Federal Government (see § 37.580).
Exhibit No. 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark S. Newman, Chief Executive Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|February 9, 2005 |  | /s/MARK S. NEWMANMark S. Newman Chief Executive
Officer
|---------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------

A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES,
INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

50

---



QuickLinks
#### § 845.10 Reimbursement.

No reimbursement will ordinarily be required from individuals with respect to payments made in their behalf under this part. However, prior to the posting of bail on behalf of a defendant, a signed agreement shall be secured from him wherein he agrees to remit the amount of such bail or permit the application of so much of his pay as may be necessary to reimburse the Government in the event that he willfully causes forfeiture of bail. In the event of such forfeiture, bail provided under this part shall be recovered from the defendant in accordance with that agreement. The agreement should include a statement that it does not prejudice the defendant's right to appeal to the Comptroller General of the United States and the courts after such payment or deduction has been made, if he considers the amount erroneous.
Exhibit 31.2
EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
**CERTIFICATION**
I, W. Curtis Fossett certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EducationalDevelopment Corporation. 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period endedAugust 31, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants internal control over financialreporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.       Date October 15, 2004 By   /s/ W. Curtis Fossett         W. Curtis Fossett
#### MARTIN v. WHISNANT

No. 509P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 556

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 December 1997.
§ 651.56 Responsibilities. ( a ) The ASA(I&E) will: ( 1 ) Serve as the Secretary of the Army's responsible official for environmental matters abroad.
( 2 ) Maintain liaison with the DUSD(IE) on matters concerning Executive Order 12114, DODD 6050.7, and this part.
( 3 ) Coordinate actions with other Secretariat offices as appropriate.
( b ) The DEP will: ( 1 ) Serve as ARSTAF proponent for implementation of Executive Order 12114, DODD 6050.7, and this part.
( 2 ) Apply this part when planning and executing overseas actions, where appropriate in light of applicable statutes and SOFAs.
( c ) The DCSOPS will: ( 1 ) Serve as the focal point on the ARSTAF for integrating environmental considerations required by Executive Order 12114 into Army plans and activities. Emphasis will be placed on those actions reasonably expected to have widespread, long-term, and severe impacts on the global commons or the territories of foreign nations.
( 2 ) Consult with the Office of Foreign Military Rights Affairs of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (International Security Affairs) (ASD(ISA)) on significant or sensitive actions affecting relations with another nation.
( d ) TJAG, in coordination with the OGC, will provide advice and assistance concerning the requirements of Executive Order 12114 and DODD 6050.7.
( e ) The Chief of Public Affairs will provide advice and assistance on public affairs as necessary.
M. P. No. 77-330.

#### Virginia Reilly *v.*Edward Alger, *Alias*Mrs. Edward Alger, *Alias*Eleanor Alger.

*James P. Flynn,*for petitioner.

*Gary Yesser,*for defendant.

The sale of the petitioners’ real estate by the sheriff of Washington County is hereby stayed pending the court’s consideration of the petitioners’ prayer for the issuance of the writ of certiorari.
Attachment 4 - Process Description
§ 1662.4 Relationship between the FOIA and the Privacy Act of 1974. ( a ) *Coverage.* The FOIA and the rules in this part apply to all SSS records. The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, applies to records that are about individuals, but only if the records are in a system of records.
( b ) *Requesting your own records.* If you have filed a FOIA request and are an individual requesting your own records that are maintained in a system of records, or if you are a parent or legal guardian authorized to act on behalf of a minor or custodian who is seeking the records about a minor or individual who has been declared incompetent, the Agency will handle your request under the Privacy Act.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03082**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### x 03082\03082_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03082\03082_Completeness_Checklist.XLS EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03082\03082_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 03082\03082_PartA.XLS Plant submitted survey file 

### x 03082\03082_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 03082\03082_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03082\Certification Statement Plant ID_03082.pdf Plant certification statement 03082\Supporting Documentation\03082_Cover Letter for Bluffview.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03082\Supporting Documentation\03082_MAP-1.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03082\Supporting Documentation\03082_water balance diagram.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**Exhibit 23.2****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-127206) pertaining to the BFC Financial Corporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-12543) pertaining to BFC Financial Corporation StockOption Plan, of our report dated March 14, 2007 (included herein), with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Bluegreen Corporation included in Bluegreen Corporation’s Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.     ERNST & YOUNG  Certified Public AccountantsMiami, Florida
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 30710 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GARION MCCOY , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:98

- CR

- 207

- 6

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Garion McCoy , federal prisoner # 01162

- 748 , appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a writ of audita querela under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. McCoy alleges that the Government suppressed impeachment evidence relating to the key witness who testified against him at trial

. McCoy was convicted of conspiring to distribute cocaine base, using and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime, and being a felon in possession

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 14, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-30710 Document: 00514873446 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2019No. 18

- 30710

2 of a firearm. Although he has raised the same claim in a motion for a new trial,

a 28 U.S.C . § 2255 mot ion, and a n attempted successive § 2255 mo tion, McCoy again asserts that new evidence discredits the witness’s testimony and that the Government should have corrected the witness’s false testimony during
trial. McCoy cannot challenge the Government’s failure to disclose evidence by writ of audita querela, as he does not identify “ a legal objection to a judgment
whic h has arisen subsequent to that judgment .” See United States v. Miller , 599 F.3d 484, 488 (5th Cir. 2010) ; Jimenez v. Tro minski , 91 F.3d 767, 768 (5th Cir. 1996) (affirming denial of writ of audita querela alleging failure to disclose exculpatory evidence because petitioner did not raise “ a legal defense arising , after the entry of judgment , sufficient to justify issuance of the extraordinary writ” )

. Moreover, McCoy fail s to show that redress i s unavailable under § 2255. See Miller , 599 F.3d at 487

- 88; United States v. Banda , 1 F.3d 354, 356 (5th Cir. 1993). That McCoy may not satisfy the requirements for a successive § 22 55 petition does not render that remedy un available

. S ee Tolliver v. Dobre , 211 F.3d 876, 878 (5th Cir. 2000). The district court’s judgment is therefore AFFIRMED

. Case: 18-30710 Document: 00514873446 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2019
#### STATE v. DOVE

No. 405P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 831

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 November 1997.
#### § 553.23 Placement of cremated remains at Army National Military Cemeteries.

All cremated remains shall be interred or inurned. The scattering of cremated remains and the burial of symbolic containers are prohibited in Army National Military Cemeteries.