alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
6/23/2010 KOHLER CO. Proposed Stack Testing Schedule 1F Kilns, Ware Dryers, and Glaze Spray Booths to be Tested

Control Stacks to Survey EU Type EU ID Device be Tested Pollutants to Test Stacks to be surveyedParameters Spartanburg SC: 1F Tunnel Kiln 02 - TK2 None POC, EE, FEHF/HCl, Metals, D/F, PM (filterable) RCE, WEE O2, ACFM 1F Tunnel Kiln 18 - TK8 None POC HF/HCl, Metals, D/F, PM (filterable) RCE, WEE O2, ACFM 1F Tunnel Kiln 38 - TK10Wet Scrubber1POC, RCE HF/HCl, Metals, D/F, PM (filterable) None Ware Dryer20 - HT WD #1 None 1 of 2 D/F other 1 of 2 ACFM Ware Dryer22- HT Tank DryerNone 1 of 3 D/F other 2 of 3 ACFM Glaze SB 07 - BBMwater curtain SBE PM (filterable) None Glaze SB 06 - LBM water curtain SBE PM (filterable) None Glaze SB 09 - Robot 3water curtain SBE PM (filterable) None Glaze SB 12 - NTMwater curtain SBE PM (filterable) None Brownwood, TX: 1F Tunnel Kiln TK-6 None RCE1, RCE2, WEE O2, ACFM 1F Tunnel Kiln TK-12 None RCE O2, ACFM Ware Dryer E117A-B None 1 of 2 D/F 1 of 2 ACFM Ware Dryer E238 None 4 of 5 D/F 1 of 5 ACFM Glaze SB E013 water curtain SBE PM (filterable) None Glaze SB E014 water curtain SBE PM (filterable) None Glaze SB SR1 water curtain SBE PM (filterable) None Glaze SB S03-S04 water curtain SBE PM (filterable) None Glaze SB SR5 water curtain SBE PM (filterable) None Kohler, WI: 1F Tunnel Kiln TK-19 None POC HF/HCl, Metals, D/F, PM (filterable) RCE, WEE O2, ACFM Ware Dryer WD-1 None WDE D/F None Spray Booth Q24 water curtain SBE PM (filterable) None

1Wet scrubber does not operate, but will be recommissioned for ICR testing only

POC = products of combustion stack EE = Entrance Exshaust stack FE = Fume Exhaust stack RCE = Rapid Cool Exhaust stack WEE = Ware Exit Exhaust stack Combined POC Stack HF/HCl, Metals, D/F, PM (filterable)
Exhibit 32.2
         Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
           U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
                         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, David A. O'Neil,
Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2004

                                       /s/ David A. O'Neil
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David A. O'Neil
                                       Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer


                                       16
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

J u ly 30 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk Ju ly 30 , 2021

161746 (1 9 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 161746

v COA: 352449

Genesee CC: 08

- 024090

- FC

GEOFFREY LAVAR LAWSON

,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the second motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the

time for filing its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer

will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 25 , 2021.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of John B. Heyward, Deceased. Viola C. Heyward, Appellant; Lillian B. Heyward, as Executrix, Respondent.

Motion to extend time to perfect appeal granted on condition that appellant argues or submits the appeal at the November 1960 Term, beginning October 31, 1960, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. The appellant’s brief must be filed on or before October 17, 1960.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Thelma Lohaus, Respondent, v. Adam Lohaus, Appellant.

In a proceeding by a wife against her husband: (a) to regain the custody of Richard Lohaus, the infant son of the parties; (b) to punish the husband for his contempt in violating a prior order of the court, dated February 17, 1961; (e) to modify said prior order insofar as it relates to the husband’s visitation rights in connection with said infant; and (d) for other relief, the husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 11, 1961, made on the oral decision of the court after a hearing, which adjudged him guilty of contempt of court; punished him therefor; modified his visitation rights under said prior *550order; and granted the wife incidental relief. [For prior appeal, see 12 A D 2d 944.] Order of April 11, 1961 modified on the law and the facts by amending its fourth decretal paragraph so as to provide: (a) that the defendant husband is found guilty of a *criminal*(rather than a civil) contempt; and (b) that the fine of $100 be paid to the Commissioner of Finance of Westchester County instead of to “ the attorney for the benefit of the plaintiff-relator.” As so modified, order affirmed, with costs to the wife payable by the husband. The finding's of fact contained or implicit in the Special Term’s decision which may be inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. In the event the husband has already paid the fine of $100 to the wife’s attorney as directed by the Special Term’s order, then the wife or her attorney is hereby directed to deposit said sum with the Commissioner of Finance on behalf of the husband. In the event the husband has not yet paid such fine, his time to pay it to said Commissioner is extended until 10 days after entry of the order hereon. Whenever a court makes a determination that any person is guilty of a contempt, it is both desirable and necessary that the court should state expressly whether the adjudication is one for a civil or for a criminal contempt or for both (e£. *Boss*v. *Boss,*2 A D 2d 758, and cases cited therein). Here the record supports the finding of the court that the husband willfully violated its order and that his actions constituted criminal contempt (Judiciary Law, § 750, subd. 3; § 751). Hence, the Special Term should have directed that the fine imposed be paid into the public treasury. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### §2328. Library

The Secretary shall maintain a library of scientific and other works and periodicals, both foreign and domestic, in the Plant Variety Protection Office to aid the examiners in the discharge of their duties.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title I, §8, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1543; Pub. L. 96–574, §3, Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3350.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–574 substituted "examiners" for "officers".
#### Samuel P. Luzzo, appellee, v. Security Trust & Deposit Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,439.

Assumpsit to recover value of certain property deposited in a *638safety deposit box rented from the defendant. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jacob H. Hopkins, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924. *Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

Rehearing denied April 27, 1925.

Warren B. Wilson and Alvin E. Stein, for appellant.

Timothy J. Pell, for appellee; P. 0. Ploberg, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 553.28 Private headstones and markers. ( a ) Construction and installation of private headstones and markers in lieu of Government-furnished headstones and markers may be approved at the discretion of the Executive Director, and are permitted only in sections of Army National Military Cemeteries in which private memorials and markers were authorized as of January 1, 1947. These headstones or markers must be of simple design, dignified, and appropriate for a military cemetery as determined by the Executive Director.
( b ) The design and inscription of a private headstone or marker must be approved by the Executive Director prior to its construction and placement. All private headstones and markers will be designed to conform to the dimensions and profiles specified by the Executive Director and will be inscribed with the location of the gravesite.
( c ) Placement of a private headstone or marker is conditional upon the primary next of kin agreeing in writing to maintain it in a manner acceptable to the Government. Should the headstone or marker become unserviceable at any time and the primary next of kin fail to repair or replace it, or if the marker is not updated to reflect all persons buried in that gravesite within 6 months of the most recent burial, the Executive Director reserves the right to remove and dispose of the headstone or marker and replace it with a standard, Government-furnished headstone or marker.
( d ) The construction of a headstone or marker to span two gravesites will be permitted only in those sections in which headstones and markers are presently spanning two gravesites and only with the express understanding that in the event both gravesites are not utilized for burials, the headstone or marker will be relocated to the center of the occupied gravesite, if possible. Such relocation must be accomplished at no expense to the Government. The Executive Director reserves the right to remove and dispose of the headstone or marker and to mark the gravesite with a Government-furnished headstone or marker if the personal representative or primary next of kin fails to relocate the headstone or marker as requested by the Executive Director.
( e ) Separate headstones or markers may be constructed on a lot (two gravesites) for a service member and spouse, provided that each headstone or marker is set at the head of the gravesite after interment has been made.
( f ) At the time a headstone or marker is purchased, arrangements must be made with an appropriate commercial firm to ensure that additional inscriptions will be promptly inscribed following each succeeding interment in the gravesite. Foot markers must be authorized by the Executive Director and may only be authorized when there is no available space for an inscription on the front or rear of a private headstone.
( g ) Except as may be authorized for marking group burials, ledger monuments of freestanding cross design, narrow shafts, and mausoleums are prohibited.
[81 FR 65877, Sept. 26, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 45408, Aug. 29, 2019]
Exhibit 15.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors Sasol Limited:  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-184526) on Form F-3 of Sasol Limited of our report dated October 9, 2013, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Sasol Limited as of June 30, 2013, 2012, and 2011, and the related consolidated income statements and  statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013, which report appears in the June 30, 2013 annual report on Form 20-F of Sasol Limited.  (signed) KPMG IncJohannesburg, South AfricaOctober 9, 2013
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Harold L. Hickey, the
Principal Executive Officer of EXCO Resources, Inc. certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of EXCO Resources, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 10, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ Harold L. Hickey                 
|                     |  |  |  | Harold L. Hickey                     
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
### §8990. Studies, reports, and audits

(a) Each contract shall contain provisions requiring the qualified company to—

(1) furnish such reasonable reports as the Office determines to be necessary to enable it to carry out its functions under this chapter; and

(2) permit the Office and representatives of the Government Accountability Office to examine such records of the qualified company as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(b) Each Federal agency shall keep such records, make such certifications, and furnish the Office, the qualified company, or both, with such information and reports as the Office may require.

(c) The Office shall conduct periodic reviews of plans under this chapter, including a comparison of the vision benefits available under chapter 89, to ensure the competitiveness of plans under this chapter. The Office shall cooperate with the Government Accountability Office to provide periodic evaluations of the program.

(Added Pub. L. 108–496, §3, Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 4010.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 23, 2004, and applicable to contracts that take effect with respect to the calendar year 2006, see section 7 of Pub. L. 108–496, set out as a note under section 8951 of this title.
#### § 221.4 Policy.

In accordance with DoD Instruction 1000.25, “DoD Personnel Identity Protection (PIP) Program” (available at *http://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/100025p.pdf*), DoD Instruction 1341.02, “Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) Procedures” (available at *http://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/134102p.pdf*), Office of Management and Budget M-04-04, “E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies” (available at *www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/fy04/m04-04.pdf*) and 32 CFR part 310, it is DoD policy that DoD will provide a secure means of authentication to PII and personal health information (PHI) for all beneficiaries and other individuals with a continuing affiliation with DoD.
### Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 6545 Dir ID: 2015

- NM

- 038

- AD

C on t acts. W ith w h o m o u tside t he F A A h a s th i s prop os al been di s cu s sed?

Organ i zat i on P erson C ont a cted D ate R e s pon s e

N at i o n a l B u s ine s s Air c r af t As s o ci at i o n E li C ott i 3 / 4 / 1 5

Re g i o n a l Airline A ss o ci at i o n 3 / 4 / 1 5

Air c r af t O w ners & P il ot s A s s o ci at i o n R o bert Ha ck m a n 3 / 4 / 1 5

Airlines fo r A m e r ica R o bert I r e l a nd 3 / 4 / 1 5
Exhibit No. 3
Form 10KSB
SPM Group, Inc.

                       ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                              TO THE
                     ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                OF
                         S P M GROUP, INC.

      Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Corporation  Act,
the  undersigned  corporation adopts  the  following  Articles  of
Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

     FIRST: The name of the corporation is S' P M Group., Inc.

       SECOND:  The  following  amendments  were  adopted  by  the
shareholders of the Corporation effective August 31, 1979, in  the
manner prescribed by the Colorado Corporation Act:

     RESOLVED, that ARTICLE IV of the Articles of Incorporation of
     this  Corporation be, and it hereby is, amended  to  read  as
     follows:

     "The  authorized  capital  stock  of  the  Corporation  shall
     consist  of  30,000,000 shares of common stock  with  no  par
     value. Each issued and outstanding share of the Corporation's
     common  stock, no par value, as of August 31, 1979, shall  be
     exchanged for 2.3 shares of common stock, no par value."

     THIRD: The number of shares of the Corporation outstanding at
the  time of such adoption was 4,993,478 and the number of  shares
entitled to vote thereon was 4,993,478.

      FOURTH: The designation and number of outstanding shares  of
each class entitled to vote thereon as a class were as follows:

Class                         Number of Shares

Common Stock, no par value         4,993,478

      FIFTH:  The  number of shares voted for such  amendment  was
4,993,478  shares;  and the number of shares  voted  against  such
amendment was -0- .

      SIXTH:  The number of shares of each class entitled to  vote
thereon   as  a  class  voted  for  and  against  such  amendment,
respectively, was:

   Class                          Number of Shares Voted
                                     For          Against
Common Stock, no par value         4,993,478          -0-

                                E-9
<PAGE>

      SEVENTH: The manner, if not set forth in such amendment,  in
which  any  exchange, reclassification, or cancellation of  issued
shares  provided  for in the amendment shall be  effected,  is  as
follows:

     The  manner  in  which  any  exchange,  reclassification,  or
     cancellation  of issued shares provided for in the  amendment
     shall  be  effected is set forth in the amendment  set  forth
     above relating to the capital stock.

                               E-10
<PAGE>
### §223. Responsibility of principal for act or omission of agent

When construing and enforcing the provisions of this chapter, the act, omission, or failure of any agent, officer, or other person acting for or employed by any packer, any swine contractor, and any live poultry dealer, stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer, within the scope of his employment or office, shall in every case also be deemed the act, omission, or failure of such packer, any swine contractor, and any live poultry dealer, stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer, as well as that of such agent, officer, or other person.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title IV, §403, 42 Stat. 168; Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title V, §503, as added Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 532, 49 Stat. 649; amended Pub. L. 100–173, §6, Nov. 23, 1987, 101 Stat. 918; Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10502(b)(2)(C), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 510.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–171 inserted "any swine contractor, and" after "packer," in two places.

1987—Pub. L. 100–173 substituted ", any live poultry dealer," for "or any live poultry dealer or handler," in two places.

1935—Act Aug. 15, 1921, title V, §503, as added Aug. 14, 1935, inserted "or any live poultry dealer or handler" after "packer" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1987 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–173 effective 90 days after Nov. 23, 1987, see section 12 of Pub. L. 100–173, set out as a note under section 182 of this title.
### subpart i—publication and review of quotas

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Inapplicability of Subpart

Subpart inapplicable to 1996 through 2001 crops of peanuts, see section 7301(a)(1)(F) of this title.

Pub. L. 101–624, title VIII, §801(4), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3459, provided that subpart I of part C of this subchapter (§1361 et seq.) is inapplicable to 1991 through 1995 crops of peanuts.

Pub. L. 99–198, title VII, §701(4), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1430, provided that subpart I of part C of this subchapter (§1361 et seq.) is inapplicable to 1986 through 1990 crops of peanuts.

Pub. L. 97–98, title VII, §701(4), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1248, provided that subpart I of part C of this subchapter (§1361 et seq.) is inapplicable to 1982 through 1985 crops of peanuts.
#### Elkin Ginsburg, appellee, v. Bull Dog Auto Fire Insurance Association of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,894.

Suit on policy of insurance against loss of automobile by theft. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. David M. Brothers, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed.

Opinion filed May 11, 1925.

Rehearing denied May 25, 1925.

Louis J. Behan and William J. Corrigan, for appellant.

Abraham Lepine, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 767.10 Requests for amendments or extensions of active permits. ( a ) Requests for amendments to active permits (e.g., a change in study design or research personnel) must conform to the regulations in this part. All information deemed necessary by the NHHC to make an objective evaluation of the amendment must be included as well as reference to the original application. Requests for amendments must be sent to the Deputy Director, Naval History and Heritage Command, 805 Kidder Breese St. SE., Washington Navy Yard, Washington DC 20374-5060. A pending amendment request does not guarantee approval and proposed activities cannot commence until approval is granted. All requests for permit amendments must be submitted during the period within which an existing permit is active and at least 30 days prior to the desired effect date of the amendment. Time-sensitive or non-substantive amendments must be submitted in writing to the point of contact included in the permit and will be considered and expedited on a case-by-case basis.
( b ) Permit holders desiring to continue research activities beyond the original permit expiration date must apply for an extension of a valid permit prior to its expiration. A pending extension request does not guarantee an extension of the original permit. All requests for a permit extension must be sent to the Deputy Director, Naval History and Heritage Command, 805 Kidder Breese St. SE., Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374-5060, at least 30 days prior to the original permit's expiration date. Reference to the original application may be given in lieu of a new application, provided the scope of work does not change significantly. Applicants may apply for one-year extensions subject to annual review.
( c ) Permit holders may appeal denied requests for amendments or extensions to the appeal authority listed in § 767.7(e).