alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit (4) - 4

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

The Banc Corporation
17 North 20th Street
Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Gentlemen:

      The undersigned hereby (i) agrees to the termination of the Deferred
Compensation Agreement, dated November 15, 1999, between The Banc Corporation
and/or The Bank and the undersigned and (ii) agrees to accept in satisfaction of
all obligations thereunder:

[CHECK ONE]

[X]               the issuance of shares of common stock of The Banc Corporation
                  in an amount representing the value of the undersigned's
                  Deferral Account Balance (as defined in such Deferred
                  Compensation Agreement) as of June 30, 2005, based on the
                  closing price per share of The Banc Corporation common stock
                  on August 1, 2005 as reported on the NASDAQ National Market
                  System.

[ ]               cash in the amount of the undersigned's Deferral Account
                  Balance as of June 30, 2005.

      By signing this Termination Agreement, the undersigned acknowledges and
agrees that he has read the letter from The Banc Corporation dated July 19,
2005, explaining the terms of termination of the Deferred Compensation
Agreement, that he has had a full opportunity to discuss such termination with
his own advisors and management of The Banc Corporation, and that the issuance
of common stock to the undersigned as described above will be in full and
complete satisfaction of any and all obligations to the undersigned under the
Deferred Compensation Agreement.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       /s/ Barry Morton
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Date: July 28, 2005

      AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED this 31st day of July, 2005

                                       THE BANC CORPORATION, on behalf of itself
                                       and, if applicable, The Bank

                                       By: /s/ C. Stanley Bailey
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Its: CEO
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 9, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40207

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TREVATHAN JABAR GLEEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas

(9:04-CR-26-1)

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Trevathan

Jabar Gleen moves for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gleen

has not filed a response. Our review of the record and counsel’s

brief shows there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
2

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                       711
<INVENTORY>                                     27,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,865
<PP&E>                                         181,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,683
<BONDS>                                         45,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,817
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,959
<SALES>                                         73,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,516
<CGS>                                           55,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,394
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,394
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        

</TABLE>
§ 69.2 Applicability and scope. This part applies to: ( a ) The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Military Departments, the Coast Guard when operating as a service of the Department of the Navy or by agreement between DoD and the Department of Transportation, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Unified and Specified Combatant Commands, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities.
( b ) The schools (prekindergarten through grade 12) operated by the DoD under 10 U.S.C. 2164 and 32 CFR part 345 within the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Wake Island, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands, known as DoD DDESS Arrangements.
( c ) This part does not apply to elected school boards established under state or local law for DoD DDESS special arrangements.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 25, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00392

- CR

Billy Bob OPPELT

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR5849

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

Appellant ’ s brief is due November 5, 2014.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006, which
this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of ElkCorp.
 Dated:  February 8, 2007
    By
    /s/ Gregory J. FisherGregory J. FisherChief Financial Officer
#### § 67.2 Applicability.

This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and the Military Departments; the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and the Defense Agencies referred to collectively in this part as the “DoD Components”). The term “Military Departments,” as used in this part, refers to the Departments of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force. The term “Secretary concerned” refers to the Secretaries of the Military Departments. The term “Military Services” refers to the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Marine Corps. The term “Reserve components” refers to the Army Reserve, Army National Guard of the United States, Air Force Reserve, Air National Guard of the United States, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve.
Exhibit 99.1




                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stanford R. Ovshinsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,

        1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date:   February 14, 2003                   By:  /s/ Stanford R. Ovshinsky
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Stanford R. Ovshinsky
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
### §12b. Trading ban violations; prohibition

It shall be unlawful for any person, against whom there is outstanding any order of the Commission prohibiting him from trading on or subject to the rules of any registered entity, to make or cause to be made in contravention of such order, any contract for future delivery of any commodity, on or subject to the rules of any registered entity.

(Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §8b, as added Pub. L. 90–258, §24, Feb. 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 33; amended Pub. L. 93–463, title I, §103(a), Oct. 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 1392; Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(5) [title I, §123(a)(20)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–410.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–554 substituted "registered entity" for "contract market" in two places.

1974—Pub. L. 93–463 substituted "Commission" for "Secretary of Agriculture".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1974 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 93–463 see section 418 of Pub. L. 93–463, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days after Feb. 19, 1968, see section 28 of Pub. L. 90–258, set out as an Effective Date of 1968 Amendment note under section 2 of this title.
#### § 61.8 Applicability.

This subpart applies to OSD, the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities in the DoD (referred to collectively in this subpart as the “DoD Components”).
Order entered December 19, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00751

- CV

NIKOLAY VLADOV, TEODORA ARSOVA, AND ELENA ARSOVA , Appellant s

V.

AUTOHAUS, LLC D/B/A EW ING AUTOMOTIVE GROUP AND

MERCEDES BENZ OF PLANO , Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 002

- 02979

- 2020

O RDER

Before the Court is court reporter Antoinette Varela’s December 16, 2022

request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record

. We GRANT the

request and ORDER the record be filed no later than January 20, 2023.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
#### H. H. Krueger and Charles H. Nowack, trading as Advertising Metal Display Company, appellees, v. John Reiner, trading as Reiner Specialty Manufacturing Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,341.

Action to recover balance due on purchase price of merchandise. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph W. Sehulman, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

William T. Pridmore, for appellant; George H. Molían, of counsel.

Moss & King, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice O ’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS v. N.C. DEPT. OF REVENUE

No. 316P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 409

Petition by petitioner (BellSouth) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 September 1997.
### Part A—Grants to States and High-Risk Urban Areas
### §1585. Certain seeds not adapted for general agricultural use

Whenever the Secretary of Agriculture, after a public hearing, determines that seed of alfalfa or red clover from any foreign country is not adapted for general agricultural use in the United States, the Secretary shall publish the determination and the reasons for the determination.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title III, §303, as added Pub. L. 103–465, title IV, §441(3), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4973.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1585, act Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title III, §303, formerly §305, 53 Stat. 1284; renumbered §303, Jan. 8, 1983, Pub. L. 97–439, §5(b)(4), 96 Stat. 2288, related to requirement that certain seeds containing alfalfa and/or red clover be stained, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–465, title IV, §441(3), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4973.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), except as otherwise provided, see section 451 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 3601 of Title 19, Customs Duties.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of the Secretary of Agriculture relating to agricultural import and entry inspection activities under this subchapter to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 231, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 530 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to disclose to non-Department of Veterans Affairs health care 

providers certain medical records of veterans who receive health care 

from such providers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2017 

Mr. MANCHIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disclose to non-Department of Veterans Affairs health care providers certain 

medical records of veterans who receive health care from 

such providers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vet Connect Act of 

5 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 530 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO DISCLOSE CERTAIN MEDICAL 

2 RECORDS OF VETERANS WHO RECEIVE NON3 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 HEALTH CARE. 

5 Section 7332(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(H)(i) To a non-Department entity (including 

9 private entities and other Federal agencies) that 

10 provides hospital care or medical treatment to vet11 erans. 

12 ‘‘(ii) An entity to which a record is disclosed 

13 under this subparagraph may not redisclose or use 

14 such record for a purpose other than that for which 

15 the disclosure was made.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 13.3
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Yaron Elad, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: April 13, 2010

/s/ Yaron EladYaron EladVice  President & Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
§ 651.13 Classified actions. ( a ) For proposed actions and NEPA analyses involving classified information, AR 380-5 (Department of the Army Information Security Program) will be followed.
( b ) Classification does not relieve a proponent of the requirement to assess and document the environmental effects of a proposed action.
( c ) When classified information can be reasonably separated from other information and a meaningful environmental analysis produced, unclassified documents will be prepared and processed in accordance with this part. Classified portions will be kept separate and provided to reviewers and decision makers in accordance with AR 380-5.
( d ) When classified information is such an integral part of the analysis of a proposal that a meaningful unclassified NEPA analysis cannot be produced, the proponent, in consultation with the appropriate security and environmental offices, will form a team to review classified NEPA analysis. This interdisciplinary team will include environmental professionals to ensure that the consideration of environmental effects will be consistent with the letter and intent of NEPA, including public participation requirements for those aspects which are not classified.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. ("CRM") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerome S. Flum,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                      By: /s/ Jerome S. Flum
                                              Jerome S. Flum
                                              Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2004
Exhibit 10.32

IBM Credit LLC

1500 RiverEdge Parkway

Atlanta, GA  30328

 

June 11, 2003

 

Mr. Mark Hirschhorn

Datatec Industries, Inc.

23 Madison Road

Fairfield, NJ  07004

Dear Mr. Hirschhorn:

We are here to inform you that you current credit line of $25,000,000.00 has been temporarily increased to $28,000,000.00 based upon recent advance requests needed to fund payroll and other company expenses presented in excess of the $25,000,000.00 credit line. This temporary increase is effective for the period beginning June 3, 2003 and ending August 31, 2003.  ON August 31, 2003 your credit line will be reduced back to $25,000,000.00.

All financing provided to you by IBM Credit LLC under this temporary portion of the credit line and the base portion of the credit line are subject to the terms and conditions of the Inventory and Working Capital Agreement (as amended from time to time) executed on November 10, 2000 and any other arrangements executed by Datatec Industries, Inc. and IBM Credit LLC.

If you have any questions regarding this information, please call Mike McGovern at (914) 765-6207 or Amy Baker at (800) 678-6900 ext. 7990.

 

 

Sincerely,						Acknowledged and Agreed to:

 

/s/ Kimberly Ramirez					/s/ Mark Hirschhorn
Kimberly Ramirez					Mark Hirschhorn

Loan Manager						CFO
DISMISS; Opinion issued May 8, 2013

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00507-CR

TERRY CLARK SHELTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F09-20518-U

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lang-Miers 

Opinion by Justice Bridges

Terry Clark Shelton was convicted of aggravated robbery. Punishment, enhanced by two 

prior felony convictions, was assessed at fifty years’ imprisonment, and was imposed in open 

court on November 5, 2010. On February 20, 2013, appellant filed a motion in the trial court 

seeking a free copy of the record for his case. It does not appear the trial court ruled on 

appellant’s motion, but appellant filed a notice of appeal on March 29, 2012.

Absent a judgment of conviction or appealable order, the Court has no jurisdiction over 

an appeal. See Nikrasch v. State, 698 S.W.2d 443, 450 (Tex. App.––Dallas ). Moreover, an 

order denying appellant a copy of the record is not an appealable order. See Wright v. State, 969 

S.W.2d 588, 589–90 (Tex. App.––Dallas 1998, no pet.).
–2–

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

130507F.U05

/David L. Bridges/

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TERRY CLARK SHELTON, Appellant

No. 05-13-00507-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F09-20518-U.

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, 

Justices Moseley and Lang-Miers 

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment entered May 8, 2013.

/David L. Bridges/

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE