alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of International Bancshares Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis E. Nixon, President and Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



By:

/s/ DENNIS E. NIXON Dennis E. Nixon PresidentDate: March 1, 2010


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether on and before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000032284
<NAME>                                         Orion Diversified Technologies

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         130,312
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       18,469
<OTHER-SE>                                   (148,781)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .00



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Gore, Appellant.

Motion granted and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include October 1960 Term of court, on condition that appellant’s typewritten brief is filed and served on or before September 29, 1960. Respondent is directed to file and serve brief on or before October 6, 1960.
Order filed, April 24, 2020

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00017

- CR 14

- 20

- 00018

- CR 14

- 20

- 00019

- CR 14

- 20

- 00020

- CR 14

- 20

- 00021

- CR

B UFORD LLOYD CROWELL , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1614719 , 1633371, 1633372, 1633373, 1663374



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 17, 2020

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’ s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Roxanne Wiltshi re , the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 15 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Christopher, Wise and Zimmerer.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132260 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132260 

 COA: 266674 

Kent CC: 04-005016-FC 

THEODORE LEE LAWTON, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 4, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court. 

l1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 29, 2006 

 Clerk
#### In the Matter of Zelodius C., Appellant, v Danny L., Respondent.

[833 NYS2d 470]

Order, Family Court, New York County (George L. Jurow, J.), entered on or about February 8, 2006, which granted petitioner mother visitation during all school vacations, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the matter remanded for a custody hearing, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Liberally construing the allegations of the pro se petition, we find that they set forth sufficient facts which, if established at an evidentiary hearing, could afford a basis for the relief sought, viz., a change in custody *(see Matter of Williams v Mullineaux,*271 AD2d 869 [2000]). For example, the petition alleged that respondent father was preventing the parties’ child from seeing petitioner *(see e.g. Vernon v Vernon,*296 AD2d 186, 192 [2002], *affd*100 NY2d 960 [2003]; *Matter of Michael C.,*282 AD2d 407 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 722 [2001]). In addition, during the course of the proceedings, petitioner discovered that respondent had moved to Troy (three hours away) without advance notice, taking the child with him *(see Matter of Hanson v Hanson,*283 AD2d 677, 678 [2001]; *Matter of Markey v Bederian,*274 AD2d 816, 817 [2000]).

We note finally that respondent has not appeared in opposition to this appeal *(see Matter of Martin R.G. v Ofelia G.O.,*24 AD3d 305 [2005]; *Matter of Clifford M.,*280 AD2d 366 [2001]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.
§ 516.35 Preparation of claims for litigation. ( a ) *General.* In preparing a referral for litigation the RJA will ensure the file contains at least the following: ( 1 ) A litigation report (See § 516.23 of this part) that demonstrates a factual basis for the claim and a theory of recovery under applicable state law. (See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11)
( 2 ) Copies of all medical records and bills reflecting the reasonable value of the medical care furnished to the injured party, including DA Form 2631-R (Medical Care-Third Party Liability Notification), and DA Form 3154 (MSA Invoice and Receipt). These documents should be authenticated as necessary on a DA Form 4.
( 3 ) Copies of all documents necessary to establish the value of lost or damaged property.
( b ) *Transmittal letter.* The letter of transmittal referring the claim for litigation should briefly summarize the facts giving rise to the claim and the collection actions previously taken by the Army and the injured party.
### §2008k. Making and servicing of loans by personnel of State, county, or area committees

The Secretary shall use personnel of a State, county or area committee established under section 590h(b)(5) of title 16 to make and service loans under this chapter to the extent the personnel have been trained to do so.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §376, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title V, §5320, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 349.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.
(December 5, 1960)

#### Frederick C. Baron et al., Respondents, v. Bobroy, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motion by respondents to extend time to serve amended complaint granted, and time extended until 10 days after the entry of the order hereon. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                                             <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           Year                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Jan-31-1999          Jan-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          Feb-02-1998          Feb-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            Jan-31-1999          May-02-1999
<CASH>                                       10,423               7,684
<SECURITIES>                                      0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 3,557               3,167
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0                   0
<INVENTORY>                                 113,225             123,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            127,564             134,406
<PP&E>                                       73,967              75,413
<DEPRECIATION>                              (35,340)            (36,569)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              172,474             179,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        37,488              45,213
<BONDS>                                           0                   0
<COMMON>                                          1                   1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                       0                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                   86,425              86,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                172,474             179,397
<SALES>                                     363,509              87,028
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            363,509              87,028
<CGS>                                       239,442              57,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               239,442              57,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            4,234                 905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              11,502               1,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                  4,287                 430
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           7,215                 701
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                   0
<CHANGES>                                      (956)                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                  6,259                 701
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.41                 .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.40                 .14


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Byron L. Bergren, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Elder-Beerman
Stores Corp., (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18. U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
         May 3, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirement
         of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

         The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
         of the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2003
                                    /s/ Byron L. Bergren
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Byron L. Bergren
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
FURNISHED TO THE ELDER-BEERMAN STORES CORP. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY
AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.









                                       18
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Zond-PanAero Windsystem Partners I (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Eric D. Gadd, Chief Executive Officer of Zond Windsystems
Management LLC, as General Partner of the Partnership (see Explanatory Note),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except that the Report
          was not timely filed, the Report is a comprehensive Form 10-K for the
          years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000 and certain sections of the
          Report contain current information; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


Date: March 30, 2005
                           /s/ ERIC D. GADD
                           ------------------------------
                           Eric D. Gadd
                           Chief Executive Officer
                           Zond Windsystems Management LLC, as General
                           Partner of Zond-PanAero Windsystem Partners I


Explanatory Note: Eric D. Gadd was appointed President and Chief Executive
Officer of the General Partner of the Partnership on September 26, 2002.
Accordingly, Mr. Gadd did not participate in the preparation of the financial
statements contained in the Report and did not work with Arthur Andersen LLP in
connection with its audits of the financial statements contained in the Report.
### Part B—Cattle Reporting
July 1, 2015

Meredith Kurpius, PhD 

Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office 

USEPA Region 9 

75 Hawthorne St., Mail Code: AIR-7 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Dear Ms. Kurpius, 

Please find attached the 2015 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan (ANP) for the San Luis Obispo 

County Air Pollution Control District. In order to satisfy the requirements for public review and 

comment specified in 40 CFR 58.10, a notice was placed on our homepage 

(http://www.slocleanair.org) from June 1 to June 30 announcing the availability of this document 

and soliciting public comment. One comment was received and it is attached to this letter along 

with our response. No changes were made to the ANP as a result of this comment, and the 

attached ANP is identical to that posted for review. 

Please contact myself or Jaime Contreras if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Karl Tupper 

Air Quality Specialist – Monitoring Division 

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District 

Ph: 805.781.4645 

Email: ktupper@co.slo.ca.us

cc: Dena Vallano, EPA Region 9 

 Gwen Yoshimura, EPA Region 9 

 Gayle Sweigert, California Air Resources Board 

 Aeron Arlin-Genet, SLOCAPCD
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1459 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that States should 

reconsider implementing ranked choice voting systems. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 

Mr. LOPEZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

States should reconsider implementing ranked choice voting systems. 

Whereas ranked choice voting forces voters to make a determination for every candidate instead of simply voting for 

their favorite, thus complicating the election process; 

Whereas a voter’s first choice vote may end up thrown out 

if their candidate receives the lowest number of first 

choice votes; 

Whereas the possibility that a vote doesn’t count creates disenfranchisement with the electoral process; 

Whereas ranked choice voting requires multiple rounds until 

a candidate receives more than 50 percent of the vote, 

prolonging the time it takes to complete the election; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1459 IH 

Whereas the complicated process leads to voter confusion; 

Whereas the increase in voting rounds may lead to counting 

errors; 

Whereas ranked choice voting has been banned by the States 

of Florida, Tennessee, South Dakota, Montana, and 

Idaho; 

Whereas candidates who would have won under traditional 

election rules have been shown to lose under the ranked 

choice voting system; and 

Whereas implementing ranked choice voting systems on a 

large scale would require hefty financial investment to 

update voting equipment: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives believes 

2 States attempting to implement ranked choice voting sys3 tems on a wide scale should evaluate the underlying agen4 da that is driving the implementation of ranked choice vot5 ing systems. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 99.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350*

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-204), the undersigned,
Daniel R. Hamilton, the Chief Financial Officer of Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

(1)  The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This
Certification is signed on April 15, 2003.

| | /s/DANIEL R. HAMILTONDaniel R. Hamilton Chief Financial OfficerProvectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

---
### §§1947, 1948. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title VI, §§615, 616(a), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1090

Section 1947, Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §317, as added Pub. L. 92–419, title I, §123, Aug. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 665, related to insured operating loans.

Section 1948, Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §318, as added Pub. L. 102–554, §8, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4146, related to special assistance to certain qualified beginning farmers and ranchers.
§ 553.9 Assignment of gravesites or niches. ( a ) All eligible persons will be assigned gravesites or niches without discrimination as to race, color, sex, religion, age, or national origin and without preference to military grade or rank.
( b ) The Army National Military Cemeteries will enforce a one-gravesite-per-family policy. Once the initial interment or inurnment is made in a gravesite or niche, each additional interment or inurnment of eligible persons must be made in the same gravesite or niche, except as noted in paragraph (f) of this section. This includes multiple primarily eligible persons if they are married to each other.
( c ) In accordance with 38 U.S.C. 2410A(a)(2) the Secretary of the Army may waive the prohibition in paragraph (b) of this section as the Secretary of the Army deems appropriate.
( d ) A gravesite reservation will be honored if it meets the following requirements, unless it is cancelled by the Executive Director: ( 1 ) The gravesite was properly reserved by law before January 1, 1962, and
( 2 ) An eligible person was interred in the reserved gravesite prior to January 1, 2017.
( e ) The Executive Director may cancel a gravesite reservation: ( 1 ) Upon determination that a derivatively eligible spouse has remarried;
( 2 ) Upon determination that the reservee's remains have been buried elsewhere or otherwise disposed of;
( 3 ) Upon determination that the reservee desires to or will be interred in the same gravesite with the predeceased, and doing so is feasible; or
( 4 ) Upon determination that the reservee would be 120 years of age and there is no record of correspondence with the reservee within the last two decades.
( f ) In cases of reservations meeting the requirements of 38 U.S.C. 2410A note, where more than one gravesite was reserved (on the basis of the veteran's eligibility at the time the reservation was made) and no interment has yet been made in any of the sites, the one-gravesite-per-family policy will be enforced, unless waived by the Executive Director. Gravesite reservations will be honored only if the decedents meet the eligibility criteria for interment in Arlington National Cemetery that is in effect at the time of need, and the reserved gravesite is available.
( g ) Where a primarily eligible person has been or will be interred as part of a group burial or has been or will be memorialized in a memorial area at Arlington National Cemetery, the Executive Director will assign a gravesite or niche for interment or inurnment of a derivatively eligible person.
( h ) Gravesites or niches shall not be reserved or assigned prior to the time of need.
( i ) The selection of gravesites and niches is the responsibility of the Executive Director. The selection of specific gravesites or niches by the family or other representatives of the deceased at any time is prohibited.
§ 552.107 References. ( a ) AR 190-5 (Motor Vehicle Traffic Supervision)
( b ) AR 190-52 (Countering Terrorism and Other Major Disruptions on Military Reservations)
( c ) AR 210-7 (Commercial Solicitation on Army Installations)
( d ) AR 210-10 (Administration)
( e ) Fort Lewis Supplement 1 to AR 190-5 (Motor Vehicle Traffic Supervision)
( f ) I Corps and Fort Lewis Installation Security and Closure Plan
( g ) HFL Form 1138 (Fort Lewis Visitor Pass)
#### § 536.125 Statutory authority for Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Claims.

The authority for this subpart is Article 139, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) (10 U.S.C. 939, which provides redress for property willfully damaged or destroyed, or wrongfully taken, by members of the Armed Forces of the United States.