alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32a**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of InternationalBancshares Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis E. Nixon, President and Principal ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), as applicable; and

(2)                          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
|        | By:                        |  /s/ Dennis E.  Nixon                |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                            | Dennis E. Nixon                           |
|   |                            | President and Principal Executive Officer |
|   |                            |                                      |
|   | Date:  March 1,  2007 |
|        |                                 |                                           |        |        |  |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not being filedfor purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, and isnot to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether onand before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
§ 651.43 Format of the EIS. The EIS should not exceed 150 pages in length (300 pages for very complex proposals), and must contain the following (detailed content is discussed in appendix E of this part): ( a ) Cover sheet.
( b ) Summary.
( c ) Table of contents.
( d ) Purpose of and need for the action.
( e ) Alternatives considered, including proposed action and no-action alternative.
( f ) Affected environment (baseline conditions) that may be impacted.
( g ) Environmental and socioeconomic consequences.
( h ) List of preparers.
( i ) Distribution list.
( j ) Index.
( k ) Appendices (as appropriate).
§ 286.3 General information. ( a ) The DoD has a decentralized system for responding to FOIA requests, with each DoD Component designating at least one FOIA Requester Service Center (RSC) to process records from that component. All DoD RSCs have the capability to receive requests electronically either through email or a web portal. To make a request for records, a requester should write directly to the DoD Component that maintains the records being sought. A request will receive the quickest possible response if it is addressed to the RSC of the DoD Component that maintains the records sought. Addresses and contact information for the RSCs are available at *https://www.foia.gov .* This Web site has the contact information for the following DoD Components: The OSD and the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, Department of the Army, Department of the Navy, Department of the Air Force, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, Defense Commissary Agency, Defense Contract Audit Agency, Defense Contract Management Agency, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Defense Health Agency, Defense Information Systems Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, Defense Technical Information Center, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Joint Personnel Recovery Agency, DoD Education Activity, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, National Guard Bureau, National Reconnaissance Office, National Security Agency/Central Security Service, Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, United States Africa Command, United States Central Command, United States Cyber Command, United States European Command, United States Northern Command, United States Indo-Pacific Command, United States Southern Command, United States Space Command, and United States Space Force, United States Special Operations Command, United States Strategic Command, and United States Transportation Command.
( b ) The OSD/Joint Staff FOIA RSC also processes FOIA requests for several DoD agencies and field activities, as well as other DoD organizations. A list of these agencies, field activities, and DoD organizations is available at *https://www.esd.whs.mil/FOID/Submit-Request/ .*
( c ) A requester who is making a request for records about himself or herself, regardless of whether the records are in a Privacy Act system of records, must comply with the verification of identity requirements as determined by the DoD Component in accordance with 32 CFR part 310.3(c) through (e).
[82 FR 1197, Jan. 5, 2017, as amended at 88 FR 84238, Dec. 5, 2023; 89 FR 5093, Jan. 26, 2024]
Map 2-13: Proposed Plan

Right-of-Way Exclusion and Avoidance Areas

Related to Greater Sage Grouse Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

USFS Proposed Priority Habitat

Management Areas (Core)

USFS Proposed Priority Habitat

Management Areas (Connectivity)

Right-of-Way Avoidance Areas

BLM and USFS Surface

Management

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: Identified restrictions displayed on this map

are in addition to existing restrictions already

approved through previous planning efforts.
### §656. NET Guard

The Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency may establish a national technology guard, to be known as "NET Guard", comprised of local teams of volunteers with expertise in relevant areas of science and technology, to assist local communities to respond and recover from attacks on information systems and communications networks.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XXII, §2206, formerly title II, §224, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2156; Pub. L. 110–53, title V, §531(b)(1)(B), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 334; renumbered title XXII, §2206, and amended Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(2)(I), (9)(A)(ii), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4178, 4180; Pub. L. 117–263, div. G, title LXXI, §7143(c)(7), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3663.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 144 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 115–278.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 substituted "Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency" for "Director of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security".

2018—Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(9)(A)(ii), substituted "Director of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security" for "Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Protection".

2007—Pub. L. 110–53 substituted "Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Protection" for "Under Secretary for Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rule of Construction

Nothing in amendment made by Pub. L. 117–263 to be construed to alter the authorities, responsibilities, functions, or activities of any agency (as such term is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502) or officer or employee of the United States on or before Dec. 23, 2022, see section 7143(f)(1) of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 650 of this title.
## Public Notice 2012 Proposed Rules

The West Virginia Division of Air Quality has sched uled a public hearing on July 11, 2011 for its 2012 proposed legislative rules, which will tak e place at the Division of Environmental Protection’s Charleston headquarters, 601 57 th Street S.E., Charleston, WV 25304. Oral and written comments will be limited to the proposed re visions and will be made a part of the rulemaking record. Copies of the rules are availabl e from the Secretary of State’s office or from
the DEP at http://www.dep.wv.gov/pio/Pages/Rules.aspx

. You may also obtain hard copies of the information by calling the phone number listed belo w.

Written comments may be submitted to the Public Inf ormation Office at the above address. Comments may also be e-mailed to dep.comments@wv.gov . The hearing dates, locations and
comment deadlines are as follows:

Division of Air Quality 45CSR8 – Ambient Air Quality Standards 45CSR14 – Permits for Construction and Major Modifi cation of Major Stationary Sources of Air Pollution for the Prevention of Significant Deterio ration
45CSR16 – Standards of Performance for New Stationa ry Sources
45CSR18 - Control of Air Pollution from Combustion of Solid Waste 45CSR19 – Permits for Construction and Major Modifi cation of Major Stationary Sources of Air
Pollution Which Cause or Contribute to Nonattainmen t 45CSR25 – Control of Air Pollution from Hazardous W aste Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Facilities 45CSR30 – Requirements for Operating Permits
45CSR34 – Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Poll utants 45CSR35 – Requirements for Determining Conformity o f General Federal Actions to Applicable Air Quality Implementation Plans (General Conformit y) 45CSR42 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Progra m

The public hearing for all air quality rules will t ake place beginning at 6 p.m. on July 11, 2011 in the Dolly Sods Conference Room. The comment period will begin on June 10, 2011 and end at the conclusion of the public hearing on July 11, 20 11. Upon authorization and promulgation of revisions to 45CSR8, 45CSR14, 45CSR19 and 45CSR35, the DAQ will submit the rules to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as revisions t o the State Implementation Plan pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act. Upon authorization and p romulgation of revisions to 45CSR18, the DAQ will submit the final rule to the U.S. EPA for approval as a part of West Virginia’s Section 111(d)/129 Plan and program delegation of the feder al New Source Performance Standards. Rules 45CSR16, 45CSR25 and 45CSR34 will be submitte d to EPA to fulfill other federal obligations under the Clean Air Act, including dele gations, plans and program approvals. Upon authorization and promulgation of 45CSR30, the rule will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a revision to th e State’s Operating Permit Program under
Title V of the federal Clean Air Act. Rule 45CSR42 is proposed to be repealed.

For more information on any of the DAQ rules call 3 04-926-0475.
§ 537.4 Claims not collectible. ( a ) Where the tortfeasor is a department, agency or instrumentality of the United States. (See § 536.27(g) of this chapter).
( b ) Where the tortfeasor is a member of the uniformed services or an employee of the DA or DOD, acting within the scope of employment, who damages or loses property. See AR 735-5, chapter 13.
( c ) Where the damage or loss of property falls under a contractor bill of lading and recovery is pursued by the contracting agency, e.g., Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC), formerly the Military Traffic Management Command (MTMC), for lost or destroyed shipments.
( d ) Where damage to assigned quarters, or equipment or furnishings therein, is collectible from a member of the uniformed services under 10 U.S.C. 2775.
( e ) Where the medical care is furnished by a Department of Veterans Affairs facility to other than active duty members of the uniformed services for service-connected disabilities.
#### Piowaty-Claussen Company, Inc., appellant, v. Joachim Cirese and Anton Graziono, copartners, trading as Cirese Brothers & Company, appellees.

Gen. No. 29,463.

Action to recover price of goods sold. Judgment for defendants. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

*639Stewart Reed Brown, for appellant.

Helen M. Cirese, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §178l. Rules and regulations

The Secretaries may issue rules and regulations necessary to effectuate the purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 95–592, §14, Nov. 4, 1978, 92 Stat. 2533; Pub. L. 98–284, §13, May 16, 1984, 98 Stat. 184.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–284 substituted "The Secretaries" for "The Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Commerce".
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-1282 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-007-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection and 

Replacement 1.0 $ 85.00 $227 $ 312.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             528
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,123
<PP&E>                                          55,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,347
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           897
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,868
<SALES>                                        150,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,606
<CGS>                                          131,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  131,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,661
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,319
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,342
<DISCONTINUED>                                     206
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,548
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46


</TABLE>
January 10, 2011

Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents Page 36 

Table 16a. Interactions Among PIs* (Updated January 10, 2011)

*NFV and IDV are not included in this table. Please refer to the FDA package insert for information regarding NFV and IDV drug interactions.

Drug 

Affected ATV FPV LPV/r RTV SQV TPV

DRV

Dose: ATV 300 mg 

once daily + DRV 600 

mg BID + RTV 100 

mg BID

No data

Should not be 

coadministered 

because doses are not 

established

Dose: (DRV 600 mg 

+ RTV 100 mg) BID 

or (DRV 800 mg + 

RTV 100 mg) once 

daily

Should not be 

coadministered 

because doses are 

not established

No data

FPV Dose: Insufficient data •

Should not be 

coadministered 

because doses are not 

established

Dose: (FPV 1,400 

mg + RTV 100 mg 

or 200 mg) once 

daily; or (FPV 700 

mg + RTV 100 mg) 

BID

Dose: Insufficient 

data 

Should not be 

coadministered 

because doses are 

not established

LPV/r

Dose: ATV 300 mg 

once daily + LPV/r 

400/100 mg BID

See LPV/r + FPV cell • LPV is coformulated 

with RTV as Kaletra.

See LPV/r + SQV 

cell

Should not be 

coadministered 

because doses are 

not established

RTV Dose: (ATV 300 mg + 

RTV 100 mg) once 

daily

See RTV + FPV cell LPV is coformulated 

with RTV as Kaletra.

•

Dose: (SQV 1,000

mg + RTV 100 mg) 

BID 

Dose: (TPV 500 mg 

+ RTV 200 mg) BID

SQV Dose: Insufficient data Dose: Insufficient data

Dose: SQV 1,000 mg 

BID + LPV/r 400/100 

mg BID

See SQV + RTV cell •

Should not be 

coadministered 

because doses are 

not established

Acronyms: ATV = atazanavir, BID = twice daily, DRV = darunavir, FDA = Food and Drug Administration, FPV = fosamprenavir, IDV = indinavir, 

LPV/r = lopinavir/ritonavir, NFV = nelfinavir, PI = protease inhibitor, RTV = ritonavir, SQV = saquinavir, TPV = tipranavir
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of McEwen Mining Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of our knowledge:

 

1.                             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: June 17,   2015 |               |
|-----------------------------|--------------------|
|                        |               |
|                        | MCEWEN MINING INC. |
|                        |               |
|                        |               |
|                        | By:                | /s/ Robert R. McEwen |
|                        |               | Robert R. McEwen,   Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |
|                        |               |   |
|                        |               |   |
|                        | By:                | /s/ Perry Y. Ing |
|                        |               | Perry Y. Ing, Vice   President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### § 26.220 By when must I publish my drug-free workplace statement and establish my drug-free awareness program?

If you are a new recipient that does not already have a policy statement as described in § 26.205 and an ongoing awareness program as described in § 26.215, you must publish the statement and establish the program by the time given in the following table:

| If . . . | then you . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (a) The performance period of the award is less than 30 days | must have the policy statement and program in place as soon as possible, but before the date on which performance is expected to be completed. |
| (b) The performance period of the award is 30 days or more | must have the policy statement and program in place within 30 days after award. |
| (c) You believe there are extraordinary circumstances that will require more than 30 days for you to publish the policy statement and establish the awareness program | may ask the DOD Component awarding official to give you more time to do so. The amount of additional time, if any, to be given is at the discretion of the awarding official. |
Costs($/yr)AnnualizedMonitoringCost($/yr)PORTLANDCEMENTPLANTSTHATARESMALLBUSNIESSAUGUST6,2010RulePlantIDKilntypeClinkerProductio(tpy)AnnualizedControln Area/MajoStatusrNHW/HWWSACIRTO/WS DLI MB Hg THC HCl PMTotalperkiln($/yr)FINALPhoenixCementAZ204 PC1,176,166 areaperISISNHW0 1,070,3110 0 0 55,000 41,609 0 58,211 1,225,131PROPOSALPhoenixCementAZ204 PC1,005,308 AreaNHW0 1,050,5460 0 0 55,000 41,609 0 34,748 1,181,903FINALArmstrongCementPA101 W145,505 AreaNHW0 132,4100 0 0 55,000 41,609 0 58,211 287,230PA102 W145,505 AreaNHW0 132,4100 0 0 55,000 41,609 0 58,211 287,230PROPOSALArmstrongCementPA101 W157,630 AreaNHW660,367 164,7240 0 0 55,000 41,609 43,297 34,748 999,745PA102 W157,630 AreaNHW660,367 164,7240 0 0 55,000 41,609 43,297 34,748 999,745FINALMonarchCementKS401 PC432,106 MajorperISIS NHW1,905,162 393,2160 0 0 55,000 41,609 0 58,211 2,453,199KS402 PC339,512 MajorperISIS NHW1,649,425 308,9560 0 0 55,000 41,609 0 58,211 2,113,200PROPOSALMonarchCementKS401 PC313,056 MajorNHW702,355 327,1440 0 0 55,000 41,609 43,297 34,748 1,204,153KS402 PC554,462 MajorNHW970,973 579,4130 0 0 55,000 41,609 43,297 34,748 1,725,041ContinentalMO301andMO302arehazardouswastekilnsandnotsubjecttotheNESHAP.Totalperfacility($/yr)1,225,1311,181,903574,4591,999,4904,566,3992,929,194