alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS 

PD-___________________ 

MICHAEL JERMAINE WILLIAMS, § 

Appellant § On Petition for Review of 

v. § No. 14-13-00527-CR

§ Court of Appeals 

§ Fourteenth District of Texas 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § 

Appellee 

PETITIONER/APPELLANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

Petitioner/Appellant Michael Jermaine Williams moves for an extension of 

time to file his petition for discretionary review, under TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b). 

I. LOWER COURT PROCEEDINGS 

Judgment in this case was entered on June 7, 2013. The court of appeals 

affirmed on December 23, 2014. No motion for rehearing was filed. 

II. PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT 

Mr. Williams’s petition is due on January 22, 2014. No previous extensions 

have been requested. 

III. REASONS FOR REQUEST 

The 30 days since the court of appeals’ opinion included the Christmas holiday, 

when counsel was vacationing with her family out of state. Further, since counsel’s 

return, counsel has missed more than a week of work with the flu. 

PD-0096-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 1/22/2015 3:52:50 PM

Accepted 1/28/2015 10:48:27 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2

Also in the last 30 days, counsel provided legal research and argument in a 

murder trial in Harris County District Court. Finally, counsel also has been working to 

complete a brief in the case of Reginald Turon Hill v. State, Cause No. 14-14-00376-CR, 

which has no further extensions and is past-due.

III. FILING OF MOTION

In the exercise of due diligence, counsel could not complete Mr. Williams’s 

petition by the deadline. This motion is not filed for purposes of delay, but so justice 

may be done.

PRAYER

Mr. Williams respectfully requests that this motion be granted and that the 

Court permit an extension of time until February 23, 2015, to file his petition for 

discretionary review.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas 

/s/ Cheri Duncan

______________________________

CHERI DUNCAN

Assistant Public Defender 

Harris County Texas

State Bar No. 06210500

1201 Franklin, 13th Floor
3

Houston Texas 77002

(713) 368-0016

(713) 368-9278 (Fax)

cheri.duncan@pdo.hctx.net

Attorney for Petitioner/Appellant,

MICHAEL JERMAINEWILLIAMS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellate 

Brief was served on the State of Texas by electronic delivery to the Appellate Division

of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and the State Prosecuting Attorney, 

on January 22, 2015.

/s/ Cheri Duncan

_________________________

CHERI DUNCAN
§ 776.42 Candor and obligations toward the tribunal. ( a ) A covered attorney shall not knowingly: ( 1 ) Make a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the covered attorney;
( 2 ) Fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the covered attorney to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;
( 3 ) Offer evidence that the covered attorney knows to be false. If a covered attorney, the attorney's client, or a witness called by the covered attorney, has offered material evidence and the covered attorney comes to know of its falsity, the covered attorney shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A covered attorney may refuse to offer evidence, other than the testimony of an accused in a criminal matter, that the covered attorney reasonably believes is false; or
( 4 ) Disobey an order imposed by a tribunal unless done openly before the tribunal in a good faith assertion that no valid order should exist.
( b ) A covered attorney who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage, is engaging or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.
( c ) The duties stated in paragraph (a) of this section continue to the conclusion of the proceedings, and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by § 776.25 of this part.
( d ) In an ex parte proceeding, a covered attorney shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the covered attorney that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse.
( e ) [Reserved]
#### STATE v. GIBBS

No. 384P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 831

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 2 October 1997. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
#### In the Matter of Alfred Satz, an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.

First Department,

May 3, 1962.

*276
      *Eric Nightingale*of counsel *(Michael Franck*with him on the brief), for petitioner.

*Alfred Sats,*respondent in person.

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent was charged with three specifications of professional misconduct. The first was withdrawn without prejudice. The third specification does not allege conduct constituting professional misconduct; respondent’s omission to answer the inquiries of the Committee on Grievances and to attend before it, while not condonable, appear to have been consistent with his omission to defend on the merits and oppose the instant motion to confirm the Referee’s report.

The second specification is that respondent neglected to prosecute a client’s tort claim. The evidence supports the specification. Respondent has offered no explanation and no extenuating circumstances.

In a prior proceeding respondent was censured for failing to prosecute a tort action in behalf of a client. *(Matter of Satz,*12 A D 2d 232.)

Respondent’s over-all conduct indicates a failure on his part to conform to the standards expected of a practicing attorney and requires us to find him guilty of professional misconduct.

Respondent should be suspended for a period of two years.

Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ., concur.

Respondent suspended for a period of two years.
No. 8370.

#### Jones, Auditor, et al. *v.*Britton.

(Decided December 15, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*Mr. Cyrus Huling*and *Messrs. Taylor, Seymour, Webber & King,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. C. T. Clark; Messrs. Rogers & Rogers; Mr. (Chas. Kinney; Mr. F. Rathmell; Mr. E. E. Corwin;*
      *565
      *Mr. M. E. ThrailMll*and *Mr. H. J. Ossing,*for defendant in error.

Judgment of the circuit court reversed,- injunction dissolved, and petition of plaintiff below dismissed.

Burket, C. J., Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew, JJ., concur.
#### Morris Rosenberg, Appellant, v. Lorraine Manor, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 29, 1961 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in favor of the defendants. Judgment affirmed, with costs. By stipulation of the parties set forth in the record, the appeal has been limited to the question of whether it was reversible error for the trial court to refuse to grant two requests to charge with respect to the violation of rule 2.16.13 of the Rules of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York. Neither rule 2.16.13 nor any other specific rule of the said hoard was asserted in plaintiff’s complaint or in his bill of particulars; nor was any such rule invoked at any time during the trial until the requests to charge were made. Nor was any specific provision of statute asserted until, on the argument of a motion to dismiss, reliance was placed on section 200 of the Labor Law. The record discloses that reference to said section was included in the charge to the jury, with appropriate explanation. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### § 26.105 Does this part apply to me?

(a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either—

(1) A recipient of an assistance award from the DOD Component; or

(2) A(n) DOD Component awarding official. (See definitions of award and recipient in §§ 26.605 and 26.660, respectively.)

(b) The following table shows the subparts that apply to you:

| If you are . . . | see subparts . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) A recipient who is not an individual | A, B and E. |
| (2) A recipient who is an individual | A, C and E. |
| (3) A(n) DOD Component awarding official | A, D and E. |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7547

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JON ROBERT ZIMNICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District

Judge. (CR-92-181, CA-97-652-2)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jon Robert Zimnick, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Zimnick, Nos. CR-92-181; CA-97-652-2 (Sept.

12, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 17, 2019

No. 04-19-00118-CR

Steven ROBLES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR4962-W1

Honorable Jennifer Peña, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF JURISDICTION. Appellant’s motion to obtain records and motion for a stay in 

abeyance are DENIED. 

It is so ORDERED on April 17, 2019.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of April, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4513-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-4513-DR), dated Aril 2, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on December 13, 2020.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, David Maurstad, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Thomas Von Essen as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2020-29297 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
**Exhibit 23.2**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the use of our report dated March 14, 2007 (except for Note 1, as to which thedate is June 29, 2007) with respect to the consolidated financial statements of BluegreenCorporation as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period endedDecember 31, 2006, which is included in the BFC Financial Corporation Annual Report (Form 10-K/A)for the year ended December 31, 2006, which is incorporated by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-127206) pertaining to the BFC Financial Corporation 2005 StockIncentive Plan and Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-12543) pertaining to BFC FinancialCorporation Stock Option Plan.     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP  Certified Public AccountantsWest Palm Beach, Florida
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(No. 333-12543 and 333-127206) of BFC Financial Corporation of our report dated March 14, 2007,except for the change in the composition of reportable segments discussed in Note 3, as to whichthe date is July 3, 2007, relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears in this Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
§ 57.2 Applicability. This part applies to: ( a ) Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities in the DoD (hereinafter referred to collectively as the “DoD Components”).
( b ) Eligible infants, toddlers, and children receiving or entitled to receive early intervention services (EIS) or special education and related services from the DoD, whose parents have not elected voluntary enrollment in a non-Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) school.
( c ) All schools operated under the oversight of the DoDEA, including: ( 1 ) Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary Schools (DDESS) operated by the DoD pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2164.
( 2 ) Department of Defense Dependents Schools (DoDDS) operated by the DoD pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 921-932 (hereinafter referred to as “overseas” schools).
( d ) Does not create any substantive rights or remedies not otherwise authorized by the IDEA or other relevant law; and may not be relied upon by any person, organization, or other entity to allege a denial of substantive rights or remedies not otherwise authorized by the IDEA or other relevant law.
#### Simon P. Merriweather, appellee, v. National Life Insurance Company of United States of America, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,498.

Action to recover indemnity under accident insurance policy. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. George Fred Rush, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 11, 1925.

Rehearing denied May 25, 1925.

Norman A. Nelson, for appellant; J. B. Boyer, of counsel.

Chit-tick, Blankenship *&*Baltz, for appellee; C. L. Blankenship, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

In connection with the quarterly report of QuixoteCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the datehereof (the “Report”), each of the officers of the Company certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
| Date:    May 5, 2005 | /s/ LESLIE J. JEZUIT                         |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                          | Leslie J. Jezuit, *Chief  Executive Officer* |
| Date:    May 5, 2005 | /s/ DANIEL P.  GOREY                         |
|                                          | Daniel P. Gorey, *Chief Financial Officer*   |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE TITAN CORPORATION'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR
THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          65,131
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  242,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     19,867
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               366,003
<PP&E>                                         118,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 709,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,569
<BONDS>                                        105,699
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        693
<COMMON>                                           506
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   709,216
<SALES>                                        175,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,499
<CGS>                                          128,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,397)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,811)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,454)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,265)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)
<FN>
<F1>DUE TO THE USE OF CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR INTERIM REPORTING,
THIS INFORMATION IS NOT COMPILED ON A QUARTERLY BASIS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §1765d. Acquisition of property

Upon the request of the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of State may use the authorities contained in the Foreign Service Buildings Act, 1926 [22 U.S.C. 292 et seq.], to acquire sites and buildings, including living quarters, for the purpose of establishing United States Agricultural Trade Offices.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title VI, §605D, as added Pub. L. 95–501, title IV, §401(1), Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1690.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Service Buildings Act, 1926, as amended, referred to in text, is act May 7, 1926, ch. 250, 44 Stat. 403, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§292 et seq.) of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 299 of Title 22 and Tables.
### **CHAPTER 113—AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY SUPPORT PROGRAMS**

Sec.
8701.
Definition of Secretary.
8702.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—DIRECT PAYMENTS AND COUNTER-CYCLICAL PAYMENTS

8711.
Base acres.
8712.
Payment yields.
8713 to 8715. Repealed.
8716.
Producer agreement required as condition of provision of payments.
8717.
Planting flexibility.
8718.
Special rule for long grain and medium grain rice.
8719.
Period of effectiveness.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—MARKETING ASSISTANCE LOANS AND LOAN DEFICIENCY PAYMENTS

8731.
Availability of nonrecourse marketing assistance loans for loan commodities.
8732.
Loan rates for nonrecourse marketing assistance loans.
8733.
Term of loans.
8734.
Repayment of loans.
8735.
Loan deficiency payments.
8736.
Payments in lieu of loan deficiency payments for grazed acreage.
8737.
Special marketing loan provisions for upland cotton.
8738.
Special competitive provisions for extra long staple cotton.
8739.
Availability of recourse loans for high moisture feed grains and seed cotton.
8740.
Adjustments of loans.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—PEANUTS

8751.
Definitions.
8752.
Base acres for peanuts for a farm.
8753, 8754.
Repealed.
8755.
Producer agreement required as condition on provision of payments.
8756.
Planting flexibility.
8757.
Marketing assistance loans and loan deficiency payments for peanuts.
8758.
Adjustments of loans.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—DAIRY

8771.
Repealed.
8772.
Dairy forward pricing program.
8773.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—ADMINISTRATION

8781.
Administration generally.
8782.
Suspension of permanent price support authority.
8783.
Availability of quality incentive payments for covered oilseed producers.
8784.
Assignment of payments.
8785.
Tracking of benefits.
8786.
Prevention of deceased individuals receiving payments under farm commodity programs.
8787.
Hard white wheat development program.
8788.
Durum wheat quality program.
8789.
Storage facility loans.
8790.
Signature authority.
8791.
Information gathering.
8792.
Geographically disadvantaged farmers and ranchers.
8793.
Implementation.