alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.13

                      SALES CONTRACT OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
                      -------------------------------------
                                                                   NO.:
                                                               SIGNED AT: Tai'an
                                                          DATE: January 15, 2003

This contract is made and entered into by and between Feicheng Longxin Materials
Storage & Transportation  Co., Ltd  (hereinafter  referred to as the Seller) and
Shandong  Shengda  Chemical  Co.,  Ltd  (hereinafter  referred to as the Buyer);
whereby  the  Seller  agree to sell  and the  Buyer  agree to buy the  commodity
mentioned in this contract subject to the terms and conditions stipulated below:

Article 1: Object, Quantity, Price and Date of Delivery

NAME OF COMMODITY: Anthracite Coal

UNIT: ton

QUANTITY: 3,000

UNIT PRICE: RMB 630 yuan

TOTAL AMOUNT: RMB 1,890,000.00 (ten million,  eight hundred and ninety thousand)
yuan

DATE OF DELIVERY: 300 tons each month

Article 2: QUALITY STANDARD

The fixed  carbon  shall be more than 78%, and the heat value shall be more than
7,000 kcal;

Article 3: TERMS AND TIME LIMIT OF QUALITY  ASSURANCE OF THE SELLER:  The sulfur
content shall be below 0.6% and the content of debris shall be less than 1%.

Article 4: SUPPLY  QUANTITY  REQUIREMENT:  The monthly  supply  shall be kept in
balance.

Article  5:  STANDARD  FOR  REASONABLE  WEAR AND TEAR AND  COMPUTING  MODE:  The
quantity  shall be based on the weighing  slip on the scale at the factory,  and
any losses shall be responsible for the Seller itself.



<PAGE>

Article 6: MEANS AND PLACE OF DELIVERY: The Buyer's coal stock.

Article 7: MODE OF TRANSPORAT AND  DESTINATION AND COST  ALLOCATION:  The Seller
shall be responsible for unloading and other expenses.


Article 8: STANDARD,  METHOD, and PLACE AND TIME LIMIT OF INSPECTION:  The check
and acceptance will be done by the Buyer; If there is any objection,  it will be
put forward within two days.

Article 9: METHOD,  TIME AND PLACE OF PAYMENT:  Cash on Delivery and the payment
shall be done on a weekly basis upon the weighing slip.

Article 10: METHOD OF SETTLING THE DISPUTE OVER THE CONTRACT:

IN THE PERFORMING OF THIS CONTRACT, IF ANY DISPUTE ARISES, THE TWO PARTIES SHALL
SETTLE IT THROUGH FRIENDLY DISCUSSIONS;  THE DISPUTE CAN ALSO BE MEDIATED BY THE
LOCAL INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERICAL ADMINISTRATION;  IF NO SETTLEMENT COMES FROM THE
DISCUSSIONS OR  MEDIATATIONS,  THE DISPUTE SHALL BE SETTLED BY LAWSUITS  THROUGH
THE PEOPLE'S COURT.

Article 11: THIS CONTRACT SHALL BECOME  EFFECTIVE  after having been  officially
signed by the two parities.


THE SELLER:                                   THE BUYER:
Feicheng Longxin Materials Storage &
Transportation Co., Ltd                       Shandong Shengda Chemical Co., Ltd


 /s/ Chen Jia boa                              /s/ Chen Zhongzhi
------------------------------------          ----------------------------------
AUTHORISED SIGNATURE                          AUTHORISED SIGNATURE
## Tegopren GS 2069 SDS

Sanitized
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.114 Applicant. A former member of the naval service who has been discharged administratively in accordance with the directives of the naval service or by sentence of a special court-martial under title 10 U.S.C. 801 *et seq.* (Uniform Code of Military Justice) and, in accordance with statutory and regulatory provisions: ( a ) Whose case is considered by the NDRB at the request of the former member, of, if authorized under § 724.113, the surviving spouse, next-of-kin or legal representative, or
( b ) Whose case is considered on the NDRB's own motion.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-10958

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jesse Martinez, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:21-CR-96-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jesse Martinez, Jr., has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

_____________________

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion 

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set 

forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 5, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10958 Document: 00516740616 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2023
No. 22-10958

2

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-10958 Document: 00516740616 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2023
### subpart vii—flexible marketing allotments for sugar

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Part VII of subtitle B of title III of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, comprising this subpart, was originally added to act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, by Pub. L. 101–624, title IX, §902, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3479, and amended Pub. L. 102–237, title I, §111(c)–(k), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1830–1836; Pub. L. 102–535, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3526; Pub. L. 103–66, title I, §1107(b), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 324. Part VII is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1403, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 187, without reference to those intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of part VII by Pub. L. 107–171.
### §2665. Withholding funds

If the Secretary determines that a State is not eligible to receive part or all of the funds to which it is otherwise entitled for programs under section 2662(a) and (b) of this title because of a failure to comply with regulations issued by the Secretary under this subchapter, the facts and reasons therefor shall be reported to the President, and the amount involved shall be kept separate in the Treasury until the expiration of the Congress next succeeding the session of the legislature of the State from which funds have been withheld in order that the State may, if it should so desire, appeal to Congress from the determination of the Secretary. If the next Congress shall not direct such sum to be paid, it shall be covered into the Treasury. If any portion of the moneys that are received by the designated officers of any State for the support and maintenance of programs authorized under this subchapter shall by any action or contingency be diminished or lost, or be misapplied, it shall be replaced by the State.

(Pub. L. 92–419, title V, §505, as added Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1444(a), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1326; amended Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6101(a)(3)(B), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4727.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2665, Pub. L. 92–419, title V, §505, Aug. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 673, related to agreements and plans, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1444(a), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1326.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 2666 of this title, prior to its repeal by Pub. L. 97–98.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "If the Secretary" for "If the Secretary of Agriculture".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
### §2236. Working capital fund for Agricultural Research Center; establishment

There is established a working capital fund of $300,000, to be available without fiscal year limitation, for expenses necessary for furnishing facilities and services by the Agricultural Research Center to Government agencies. Said fund shall be reimbursed from applicable appropriations or other funds to cover the charges for such facilities and services, including handling and related charges, for equipment rentals (including depreciation, maintenance, and repairs), for supplies, equipment and materials, stores of which may be maintained at the Center, and for building construction, alterations, and repairs, and applicable appropriations or other funds may also be charged their proportionate share of the necessary general expenses of the Center not covered by the annual appropriation.

(Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, Ch. VI, title I, §101, 64 Stat. 658.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 542–2 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the Company) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending October 7, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terry D. Frandsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                        |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/ Terry D. Frandsen                                   |  |  |  | 
|                                                        |  | 
|Terry D. Frandsen Chief Financial Officer March 9, 2007 |  |  |  |
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 30357 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DAMARIO HENDERSON

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:10

- CR

- 302

- 8

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Damario Henderson has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Henderson h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed coun sel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
November 29, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-30357 Document: 00514741759 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2018No. 18

- 30357

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

exc used from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-30357 Document: 00514741759 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2018
### §136w–5. Minimum requirements for training of maintenance applicators and service technicians

Each State may establish minimum requirements for training of maintenance applicators and service technicians. Such training may include instruction in the safe and effective handling and use of pesticides in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency approved labeling, and instruction in integrated pest management techniques. The authority of the Administrator with respect to minimum requirements for training of maintenance applicators and service technicians shall be limited to ensuring that each State understands the provisions of this section.

(June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §30, as added Pub. L. 104–170, title I, §121(2), Aug. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1492.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 30 of act June 25, 1947, ch. 125, was renumbered section 34 and is classified to section 136x of this title.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /S/ George P. ScanlonName:
    
    George P. ScanlonTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    July 3, 2007
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm

We have issued our reports dated June 1, 2011, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control overfinancial reporting included in the Annual Report of UQM Technologies, Inc. andsubsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011. We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statementsof UQM Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 033-34612,File No. 033-81430, File No. 033-92288, File No. 333-101371, File No.333-129251, File No. 333-164705, File No. 333-168999 and File No. 333-169000)and Form S-3 (File No. 333-160913).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

Denver, Colorado

June 1, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              65,127
<SECURITIES>                                     1,730,628
<RECEIVABLES>                                       44,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,869,790
<PP&E>                                             671,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                     595,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,584,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              400,052
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            94,483
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,076,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,584,510
<SALES>                                            229,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   827,494
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   180,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    647,374
<INCOME-TAX>                                       223,723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                423,651
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       423,651
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .51
        


</TABLE>
§ 552.72 Use of the allotment of pay system. ( a ) Allotments of military pay will be made in accordance with Army Regulation 37-104-3. Allotments will not be made to an insurer for the purchase of a commingled sale (e.g., retirement plans, securities).
( b ) Under no circumstances will agents have allotment forms in their possession or attempt to assist or coordinate the administrative processing of such forms.
( c ) For personnel in grades E-1, E-2, and E-3, at least 7 days should elapse between the signing of a life insurance application or contract and the certification of an allotment. The purchaser's commanding officer may grant a waiver of this requirement for good cause, such as the purchaser's imminent permanent change of station.
§ 200.2002 Hearing before an ALJ. ( a ) A party sanctioned under any criteria specified in this part may request a hearing before an ALJ.
( b ) In civil money penalty cases, the parties to the proceeding will consist of the respondent and the DHA.
( c ) The request for a hearing will be made in writing to the DAB; signed by the petitioner or respondent, or by his or her attorney; and sent by certified mail. The request must be filed within 60 days after the notice, provided in accordance with § 200.1500, is received by the petitioner or respondent. For purposes of this section, the date of receipt of the notice letter will be presumed to be 5 days after the date of such notice unless there is a reasonable showing to the contrary.
( d ) The request for a hearing will contain a statement as to the specific issues or findings of fact and conclusions of law in the notice letter with which the petitioner or respondent disagrees, and the basis for his or her contention that the specific issues or findings and conclusions were incorrect.
( e ) The ALJ will dismiss a hearing request where— ( 1 ) The petitioner's or the respondent's hearing request is not filed in a timely manner;
( 2 ) The petitioner or respondent withdraws his or her request for a hearing;
( 3 ) The petitioner or respondent abandons his or her request for a hearing; or
( 4 ) The petitioner's or respondent's hearing request fails to raise any issue which may properly be addressed in a hearing.
#### NATIONSBANK OF VA. v. WDF-HICKORY, INC.

No. 407P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 830

Petition by defendants (WDF-Hickory, Inc., Wayne D. Franklin and Basic Tool Co.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Council of Councils, January 29, 2021, 10:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m., a virtual meeting, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 25, 2020, 85 FR 75342.                

The meeting notice is amended to change the open session meeting end time as follows: The open session will now be held from 11:00 a.m. to 3:50 p.m.

Dated: January 5, 2021.

Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-00221 Filed 1-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4989

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

STEFFEN V. WRIGHT, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, 

District Judge. (5:03-cr-00052-2) 

Submitted: April 10, 2009 Decided: April 21, 2009 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, 

Appellate Counsel, David R. Bungard, Assistant Federal Public 

Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. 

Miller, United States Attorney, John L. File, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Steffen V. Wright appeals his sentence to eleven 

months in prison and forty-eight months of supervised release 

imposed in the district court’s judgment revoking supervised 

release. On appeal, Wright does not challenge the district 

court’s finding that he violated the conditions of his 

supervised release, but he contends that his eleven-month prison 

sentence is plainly unreasonable because it does not further the 

purposes of supervised release. We affirm. 

We will affirm a sentence imposed after revocation of 

supervised release if it is within the prescribed statutory 

range and not plainly unreasonable. United States v. Crudup, 

461 F.3d 433, 439-40 (4th Cir. 2006). We first consider whether 

the sentence is procedurally or substantively unreasonable. Id.

at 438. While a district court must consider the Chapter 7 

policy statements, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual Ch. 7, Pt. 

B (2007), and the statutory requirements and factors applicable 

to revocation sentences under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e) 

(2006), the district court ultimately has broad discretion to 

revoke the previous sentence and impose a term of imprisonment 

up to the statutory maximum. Id. at 438-39. Only if we find 

the sentence procedurally or substantively unreasonable, must we 

decide whether it is “plainly” unreasonable. Id. at 439. 

2 
3 

We have reviewed the record and find Wright’s sentence 

is both procedurally and substantively reasonable, and within 

the prescribed statutory range. In imposing its sentence, the 

district court considered Wright’s policy statement range under 

USSG § 7B1.4 and the relevant statutory requirements and 

factors, and the court reasonably determined a prison sentence 

at the high end of the policy statement range, followed by a new 

supervised release term, was appropriate in this case. 

We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### STATE v. HURST

No. 441P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 54

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal allowed November 1997.
#### HINEMAN v. HINEMAN

No. 24P98

Case below: 128 N.C.App. 188

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 March 1998.