alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §124d. Intelligence components

Subject to the direction and control of the Secretary, and consistent with any applicable guidance issued by the Director of National Intelligence, the responsibilities of the head of each intelligence component of the Department are as follows:

(1) To ensure that the collection, processing, analysis, and dissemination of information within the scope of the information sharing environment, including homeland security information, terrorism information, weapons of mass destruction information, and national intelligence (as defined in section 3003(5) of title 50), are carried out effectively and efficiently in support of the intelligence mission of the Department, as led by the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis.

(2) To otherwise support and implement the intelligence mission of the Department, as led by the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis.

(3) To incorporate the input of the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis with respect to performance appraisals, bonus or award recommendations, pay adjustments, and other forms of commendation.

(4) To coordinate with the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis in developing policies and requirements for the recruitment and selection of intelligence officials of the intelligence component.

(5) To advise and coordinate with the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis on any plan to reorganize or restructure the intelligence component that would, if implemented, result in realignments of intelligence functions.

(6) To ensure that employees of the intelligence component have knowledge of, and comply with, the programs and policies established by the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis and other appropriate officials of the Department and that such employees comply with all applicable laws and regulations.

(7) To perform such other activities relating to such responsibilities as the Secretary may provide.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title II, §207, as added Pub. L. 110–53, title V, §503(a), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 311.)
#### Marian L. Williams et al., Respondents, v. Krawklein Realty Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Third-Party Plaintiff. Harry Kenigsberg, Third-Party Defendant.

Order entered on February 1, 1962, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss action for failure to prosecute, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant upon condition, however, that within 30 days after the entry of the order herein plaintiffs-respondents shall pay $100 costs and, in addition, costs and disbursements taxable to date in this action; and all said costs and disbursements including the costs of this appeal are charged to, arid shall be paid personally by the attorneys for the plaintiffs; and in the event the said costs and disbursements are not paid within said 30-day period, the order entered February 1, 1962, is reversed on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and defendant’s motion granted, with $10 costs. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Gorman , Robert (05T) Thursday, April 17, 2014 5:21 PM Robert Silverberg ; Darren Martin ; Alec.Bramlett@aa.com Robbie Samstein; Hammonds, Karla (OST) RE: Motion for Leave for Supplemental Filings - Martin and Sam stein - American Airlines

- April 14, 2014 p~ '- 

### ~ ~ -.

Gentlemen , After reviewing Mr. Martin's and Mr. Samstein ' s motion for leave to fi le supplemental fi li ngs , and Ameri can ' s response the reto , the motion i s granted, as follows : 1 . Mr. Martin and M r. Samste i n are permitted to file a j oint reply , not to exceed five pages and l imited to responding to the statements of Ame ri can in its consolidated answer, by April 25 , 2014. 2 . American is pe rmitted to file a final surreply, not to exceed five pages and l im ited to the statements in the reply. This surrep ly shall be filed within 10 days of the fi l ing of the rep ly . A copy of this email will be placed in the docket. Regards , Robe rt M . Gorman Sen i o r Tr i a l At t o rn ey Avi at i on En fo r c ement and Pr oce e d i ng s , C - 7 0 Office o f the Gene r a l C o un se l U . S . D ep ar tmen t o f Tr ans port at ion 1 2 00 New Je r s ey Avenu e , SE We st Bu i l ding 9 6
- 413 Was hi ng t on , DC 2 0590 Of f ice : 202
- 366
- 93 5 0 E - ma il : r obe rt . gorman@dot . g ov

From: Robert Silverberg [ma i lto:rsilverberg@sgbdc.com]

. Sent: Tuesday, April 

### 15, 20144:03 PM 

### To: Darren Martin; Gorman, Robert COST); Alec.Bramlett@aa.com Cc : Robbie Samstei n 

### Subject: RE: Motion for Leave for Supplemental Filings - Martin and Samstein - American Airlines - Apri l 

### 14 , 20 1 4 Mr. Martin and Mr. Samstein, Attached please find American ' s answer to your motion for leave to file supplemental filings . Regards Bob Silverberg 1

## ------- -------- --- 

## ---------------- - ------------

from: Darren Martin [mailto:darren martin02115@yahoo.com] 

### Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 11:13 PM 

### To: Robert.Gorman@dot
. gov; Robert Silverberg; Alec . Bramlett@aa.com 

### Cc: Robbie Samstein 

### Subject: Motion for Leave for Supplemental Filings - Martin and Samstein - American Airlines - April 14, 2014

Dear sirs, Please find attached the following motion which was filed on Regulations.gov earlier today. Thank you , Darren Martin

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of August 2, 1997, and the condensed
consoldiated statement of operations for the 26 weeks ended August 2, 1997, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                         170,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    220,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               407,700
<PP&E>                                         339,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 198,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 627,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,200
<OTHER-SE>                                    (41,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   627,600
<SALES>                                        460,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               460,600
<CGS>                                          323,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.76)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29275]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


U.S. Army Science Board; Notice of Federal Advisory Committee 
Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting; cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army published a notice of a Federal 
Advisory Committee meeting of the U.S. Army Science Board (ASB) in the 
Federal Register on Monday, December 21, 2020. The purpose of the 
meeting on January 5, 2021 was for ASB members to review, deliberate, 
and vote on the findings and recommendations on the following study: 
``An Independent Assessment of the 2040 Battlefield and its 
Implications for 5th Generation Combat Vehicle Technologies''. The 
meeting on January 5, 2021 is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Heather J. Gerard, (703) 545-8652, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#48202d293c202d3a6622662f2d3a293a2c21662b213e082529212466252124"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a020f0b1e020f184400440d0f180b180e034409031c2a070b030644070306">[email protected]</span></a> or Ms. Gloria Mudge at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97f0fbf8e5fef6b9fbb9fae2f3f0f2b9f4fee1d7faf6fefbb9fafefb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9cec5c6dbc0c887c587c4dccdcecc87cac0dfe9c4c8c0c587c4c0c5">[email protected]</span></a>. Mailing address is Army Science Board, 
2530 Crystal Drive, Suite 7098, Arlington, VA 22202. Website: https://asb.army.mil/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to circumstances beyond the control of 
the Department of Defense and the Designated Federal Officer for the 
U.S. Army Science Board was unable to provide public notification 
required by 41 CFR 102-3.150(a) concerning the cancellation of the 
previously noticed January 5, 2021 meeting of the U.S. Army Science 
Board. Accordingly, the Advisory Committee Management Officer for the 
Department of Defense, pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.150(b), waives the 15-
calendar day notification requirement.

James W. Satterwhite Jr.,
Alternate, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020-29275 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5061-AP-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §161a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was from the Department of Agriculture Appropriation Act, 1945, act June 28, 1944, ch. 296, 58 Stat. 440, related to disposition of moneys from inspection and certification of domestic plants and plant products for export, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in prior appropriation acts as follows:

July 12, 1943, ch. 215, 57 Stat. 408.

July 22, 1942, ch. 516, 56 Stat. 686.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Top
# Court of Appeals
**First District of Texas**

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01

- 15

- 00236

- CV

Silvia G. Sanchez and Isaias Sanchez

v
.
Federal National Mortgage Association

NO. 1056888 IN THE CO CIVIL CT AT LAW N O 1 OF HARRIS C OUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE CLK RECORD FILING STATEWIDE EFILING $10.00 $68.00 $175.00 $20.00 04/03/2015 03/20/2015 03/17/2015 03/17/2015 E

- PAID
PAID E

- PAID E

- PAID ANT
ANT ANT ANT



### The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are $273.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine , Clerk o f the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, this June 26 , 2015

.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO: Addressees (See Below)

FROM: Director, Risk Management Service

Office of the Secretary

SUBJECT: Amendment to the Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative 

Agreements

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me from the Secretary by delegation EA/EAR/165,

certified on March 26, 2008, I hereby amend your respective redelegations of 

authority to perform the functions related to the award, management and oversight of 

formula and discretionary grants and cooperative agreements within your 

programmatic authority, certified on April 11, 2008, to include the authority to 

approve State applications, consolidated State applications, State plans, and 

consolidated State plans for formula grants.

II. RESERVATIONS

The provisions under the “Reservations” section in the original delegation apply

to this amendment.

III. REDELEGATION

The provision under the “Redelegation” section in the original delegation applies

to this amendment.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This amendment is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 
Page 2 - Amendment to the Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative 

Agreements

authority. I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the 

addressees prior to the date of certification.

 

_________/s/____________

 Phil Maestri

ADDRESSEE LIST:

Deputy Secretary 

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services 

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education 

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools 

Director, Institute of Education Sciences 

Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education ◄▬▬▬

Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director for English Language Acquisition

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement

Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 1/15/2010

Certified Date: 2/2/2010

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EAR/ES/77-A
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dex One Corporation as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerMay 13, 2010
    
    
    
    May 13, 2010
Exhibit 10.4

                   SECOND AMENDMENT TO 2003 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                              FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS
                           AND ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS

      The following amendment to the 2003 Stock Option Plan for Outside
Directors and Advisory Board Members (the "Plan") was adopted by the Board of
Directors of UltraStrip Systems, Inc. on September 8, 2005.

      1.    Section 3(n) is deleted and replaced by the following:

      n.    "FAIR MARKET VALUE" shall be determined as of the Grant Date and
shall mean:

                  (i)   the closing price of the Company's Common Stock
appearing on a national securities exchange if the principal market for the
Common Stock is such an exchange, or, if not listed or not the principal market,
the closing price on The Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq").

                  (ii)  if the Company's Shares are not listed on Nasdaq, then
the closing price for its Common Stock as listed on the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc.'s Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the "Bulletin
Board"); or

                  (iii) if the Company's Common Stock is not listed on the
Bulletin Board, then the average bid and asked price for the Company's Shares as
listed in the National Quotation Bureau's "pink sheets;" or

                  (iv)  if there are no listed bid and asked prices
published in the pink sheets, then the fair market value shall be based upon the
average closing bid and asked price as determined following a polling of all
dealers making a market in the Company's Common Stock."

                  (v)   In the absence of an established market for the
Common Stock, the Fair Market Value thereof shall be determined in good faith by
the Administrator.

      2.    Section 3(o) is deleted and replaced by the following:

      o.    "GRANT DATE" means the last trading day prior to when an Option is
granted.

      3.    Section 5(a)(ii) shall be amended by adding the following at the
beginning: "Except for discretionary grants by the Board or its Compensation
Committee" and deleting "No."

<PAGE>

      4.    Section (6)(b) is deleted and replaced by the following:

      "b. Exercise Price. "The Option exercise price per Share shall be 100% of
the Fair Market Value per Share on the Grant Date."

      5.    Section (7)(a) shall be modified by inserting the following at the
beginning of the second sentence: "Except for discretionary grants permitted by
this Plan, all" and deleting "All."

      6.    Section 15(a)(i)(2) shall be modified by inserting: "to the extent
that Section (16)(c) has not been amended," at the beginning.

      7.    A new Section (16)(c) shall be added as follows:

      c.    "Holding Period. No Common Stock may be sold for at least six months
following the Grant Date of the underlying Option."
_____________ No. 95-3837WM

_____________ City of Kansas City, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * James Frederick Newport, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: February 27, 1996 Filed: March 6, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM.

James Fre derick Newport filed a petition to remove to federal court state criminal proceedings pending against him in the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit of Missouri, Kansas City Municipal Division. The district court determ ined that removal was improper because Newport alleged no causa l connection between his purported duty as a member of the United States Arm y Reserves and the pending charges for littering and disorderly conduct. Th e district court dismissed the petition. We agree with the district court that Newport was not entitled to removal. See M aryland v. Soper , 270 U.S. 9, 33 (19 26); Mesa v. California , 489 U.S. 121, 131-32 (1989). Th e appropriate course of action, however, was not dismissal, but remand to th e state court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(4) ("If it clearly appears . . . tha t removal should not be permitted, the court shall make an order for summary remand."); 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(3) ("judgment of conviction [in the state criminal proceedings] shall not be entered unles s the prosecution is first

### -2-

remand ed"); Continental Cablevision of St. Paul, Inc. v. United State s Postal Serv. , 945 F.2d 1434, 1441 n.3 (8th Cir. 1991).
We thus vacate the district court's dismissal order and remand to the district court for re mand to the state court. Newport's motion to expand the record is granted.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Memo

To: Keith Rose, EPA Region 10

From: Brian Finneran, DEQ Air Quality

Date: 1 February, 2011

Re: Oregon FEPL Source permits

Attached are the current permits you requested for the three BART-eligible sources which adopted a federally 

enforceable permit limit (FEPL) in 2008-2009 to permanently lower their emissions to below the 0.5 deciview 

threshold level, prior to the adoption the 2009 Oregon Regional Haze Plan. For further information on these 

FEPLs, see pages 147-148 and Table 10.3.2-2 in Chapter 10 of the plan. Since these sources have large Title 

V permits, I have only included the sections that pertain to the BART-eligible emission units affected by the 

FEPL. Below is additional information related to each FEPL and the permit sections provided.

1. International Paper (Springfield OR). The attached document consists of Addendum No.3 (11 pages) and 

the Review Report (13 pages). Both reflect revisions to the Title V permit made on April 7, 2009, exclusively for 

the purpose of establishing the FEPL for this source.

Emissions SO2 NOx PM

2003-2005 28056 8136 2383

FEPL 22666 3756 1393

Reduction 5390 4380 990

Note: Current fuel type - natural gas, spent liquor, pet coke, #2 fuel oil, #6 fuel oil. FEPL based on fuel 

limit, limits on operation, and meeting a combined SO2 and NOx emission limit formula. 

2. PGE Beaver (Clatskanie, OR). The attached document consists of the permit (46 pages) and the review 

report (50 pages). The permit was revised on January 21, 2009 for several purposes, which included

establishing the FEPL for this source. 

Emissions SO2 NOx PM

2003-2005 1768 18665 2533

FEPL 109 18235 292

Reduction 1659 430 2241

Note: Source burned distillate fuel oil. FEPL based using a cleaner ultra-low sulfur fuel (0.0015% 

sulfur), and limit on oil use. New daily limit 521,000 gallons. Previous max daily limit 837,232 gallons.

3. GP Wauna (Clatskanie, OR). The attached document consists of Part 1 of the permit (77 pages) and the 

review report (19 pages). Like the permit above for PGE Beaver, this permit was revised on June 18, 2009, for 

several purposes, which included establishing the FEPL. The permit was revised again on December 12, 2010, 

for other purposes than regional haze. The attached document is the most current permit on file. 

Emissions SO2 NOx PM

2003-2005 19725 5833 3165

FEPL 12525 5832 1939

Reduction 7200 1 1226

Note: Source previously used both natural gas and residual fuel oil. FEPL based on burning only 

natural gas, reconfiguring the emission control system to eliminate an incinerator, and production limits.