alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1542 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1542

Supporting the designation of October 15, 2024, as ``National Pregnancy 
 and Infant Loss Remembrance Day'' and recognizing the people who have 
                     lost a pregnancy or an infant.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2024

Mr. Schneider (for himself, Mr. Carey, Mr. Davis of North Carolina, Ms. 
 Sewell, Ms. Crockett, Mr. Grijalva, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Ms. Norton, 
 and Mr. Trone) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
            to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the designation of October 15, 2024, as ``National Pregnancy 
 and Infant Loss Remembrance Day'' and recognizing the people who have 
                     lost a pregnancy or an infant.

Whereas 2024 marks the 18th nationally recognized ``Pregnancy and Infant Loss 
        Remembrance Day'';
Whereas each year, approximately 1,000,000 pregnancies in the United States end 
        in miscarriage, stillbirth, or the death of a newborn;
Whereas pregnancy and infant loss can affect families long after the loss;
Whereas loss of an infant or a pregnancy can negatively affect a person's mental 
        health;
Whereas families would benefit from bereavement leave from work to take care of 
        themselves and their families;
Whereas people who have experienced pregnancy loss or infant loss should not 
        have their experiences minimized or stigmatized;
Whereas Congress should acknowledge the personal experiences of individuals who 
        have lost a pregnancy or infant and empower those individuals to speak 
        about their losses;
Whereas recognizing ``Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day'' is an 
        opportunity to increase awareness, promote research and greater 
        understanding, and provide community to individuals who have experienced 
        pregnancy loss or infant loss; and
Whereas ``Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day'' allows the people of the 
        United States to consider how we can best support families who 
        experience, or work to prevent, pregnancy or infant loss: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of ``National Pregnancy 
        and Infant Loss Remembrance Day'';
            (2) understands the importance of honoring these losses and 
        supporting affected people and their families; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling upon the people of the United States to observe such 
        day with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
### §178e. Cooperative projects with Mexico, Australia, and Israel

The Secretaries, in consultation with the Secretary of State, are authorized and encouraged to enter into cooperative projects with the Government of Mexico, the Government of Australia, and the Government of Israel in order to accomplish appropriate aspects of the research and development provided for in this subchapter. Such cooperative projects should include, but not be limited to, projects to determine the economic feasibility of extraction and processing of latex and other critical agricultural materials produced in the United States.

(Pub. L. 95–592, §7, Nov. 4, 1978, 92 Stat. 2532; Pub. L. 98–284, §7, May 16, 1984, 98 Stat. 183.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–284 inserted ", the Government of Australia, and the Government of Israel", and substituted "extraction and processing of latex and other critical agricultural materials produced in the United States" for "latex extraction and processing".
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


Knoxville, Tennessee





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-167906 and 333-147783) of Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2011(except for Note 13, as to which the date is July 22, 2011) relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010.  Our report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.





/s/ BDO USA, LLPChicago, IllinoisJuly 22, 2011
124 STAT. 2500 PUBLIC LAW 111–238—SEPT. 27, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6102: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Sept. 14, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–238 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to extend 

the authority of the Secretary of the Navy to enter into multiyear contracts 

for F/A–18E, F/A–18F, and EA–18G aircraft. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR F/A–18E, F/ 

A–18F, AND EA–18G AIRCRAFT. 

(a) EXTENSION OF CERTIFICATION.—Paragraph (2) of section 

128(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2217) is amended by striking 

‘‘a reference to March’’ and inserting ‘‘a reference to September’’. 

(b) REQUIRED AUTHORITY.—Such section 128 is further amended 

by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(e) REQUIRED AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with respect to a multiyear contract entered into under 

subsection (a), this section shall be deemed to meet the requirements under subsection (i)(3) and (l)(3) of section 2306b of title 

10, United States Code.’’. 

Approved September 27, 2010. 

Sept. 27, 2010 

[H.R. 6102] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350): I, Thomas D. Karol, Chief Executive Officer of ElkCorp, certify to my knowledge and belief
pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350) that:  (1)
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, which
this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of ElkCorp. Date: May 6, 2005
    
    
    
    By
    /s/
    
    Thomas D. KarolThomas D. KarolChief Executive Officer
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 156 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit Members 

of Congress from owning individual stocks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2023 

Ms. CRAIG submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ethics 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

prohibit Members of Congress from owning individual stocks. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘NO STOCK 

4 Resolution’’ or the ‘‘No Option for Stock Trading and 

5 Ownership as a Check to Keep congress clean Resolution’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING MEMBERS OF HOUSE OF REPRESENT7 ATIVES FROM OWNING INDIVIDUAL STOCKS. 

8 Rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representa9 tives (known as the ‘‘Code of Official Conduct’’) is amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:24 Feb 25, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR156.IH HR156

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 156 IH 

1 ed by redesignating clause 22 as clause 23 and inserting 

2 after clause 21 the following: 

3 ‘‘(22) PROHIBITING MEMBERS OF

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM OWN5 ING INDIVIDUAL STOCKS.—A Member, 

6 Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may 

7 not own the common stock of any indi8 vidual public corporation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135230 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135230 

 COA: 269157 

Van Buren CC: 05-014760-FC 

MARK DAVID WOOD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 18, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0114 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 22, 2008 

 Clerk
#### BECK v. ROWAN COUNTY

No. 359P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 634

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1540 

Thanking and promoting the professions of perinatal nurses by encouraging 

participation in National Perinatal Nurses Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2024 

Mr. JOYCE of Ohio (for himself and Ms. BONAMICI) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Thanking and promoting the professions of perinatal nurses 

by encouraging participation in National Perinatal 

Nurses Week. 

Whereas perinatal nurses, which includes labor and delivery 

nurses, mother-baby nurses, and neonatal nurses, work 

with patients who are attempting to become pregnant, 

are currently pregnant, or have recently delivered; 

Whereas perinatal nurses provide care for women with highrisk pregnancies, including those who have undergone infertility treatments, such as in vitro fertilization; 

Whereas perinatal nurses continue to provide prenatal care 

and testing, care of patients experiencing pregnancy complications, care during labor and delivery, and care of patients following delivery when there has been a persistent 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1540 IH 

shortage of nurses across all fields while demand for 

nurses only continues to grow; 

Whereas continuous support during labor from a registered 

nurse is critical to achieve improved birth outcomes; 

Whereas nurses are positioned to provide unique insight into 

patient care circumstances where a woman is at risk of 

death, thereby reducing the rate of and disparity in maternal mortality; 

Whereas mothers are dying in the United States at the highest rate in the developed world, and the crisis is most severe for Black mothers; 

Whereas October 10, both the 10th month of the year and 

10th day of this month, was chosen to celebrate National 

Perinatal Nurses Week to represent an Apgar score of 

10, a score that represents the healthiest state for a newborn baby, and the 10 centimeters of dilation that determine a woman’s successful completion of the first phase 

of labor; and 

Whereas the week of October 10, 2024, through October 17, 

2024, is set aside to celebrate National Perinatal Nurses 

Week to raise public awareness of and celebrate the 

350,000 perinatal nurses who are clinically active in hospitals, perinatal facilities, and health centers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives thanks 

2 and promotes the professions of perinatal nurses by en3 couraging patients, hospital administrators, health care 

4 professionals, policymakers, and others to become more faVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:06 Oct 11, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1540.IH HR1540

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1540 IH 

1 miliar with the contributions of perinatal nurses by par2 ticipating in National Perinatal Nurses Week. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# f?25Tj ) ll-E-21 0 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:12 AM

Sheet 250 of 264P. 2 

# A-qn-5 1 Mr . Keit h Barnet t Pag e 1 CONTAC T REPOR T Perso n Calling :
Perso n Called :
Dat e o f Contact : Keit

h Barnet t U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y OAQPS/ESD/OC G 919-541-560 5 Mr . Jim- Waterma

n Molde dFibe r

Glas s Compan y Linesville , P A 814-683-450 0 Jul y 3 , 200 0 Contac t Summary : Thi s facilit

y still fold s th e edge s o f

it' s SM C rolls . The y hav e av-shape dpiec e o f meta l tha t lef t u p on e edge , an dthe n the y rol l th e SM C whic h tuck s th e edg e in . The y don' t se e foldin g th e edg e a s aproblem . I t

woul db e aproble mi f

the y festoone dth e SM C rathe r the n rolling . (Festoo n mean s th e SM C i s folde dbac k an dfort h in acontaine dlike continuou s for mcompute r

paper. ) Mr . Waterma n sai dh e di dnot kno w any reaso n tha t

anyon e woul dfestoo n SMC , bu t h e ha d hear do f th e process .

Confirmation : I confir

mtha t th e informatio

n abov e i s correc

t correc t wit h th e changes note

dabove . Signature :
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1459 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1459

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that States should 
         reconsider implementing ranked choice voting systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2024

Mr. Lopez submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that States should 
         reconsider implementing ranked choice voting systems.

Whereas ranked choice voting forces voters to make a determination for every 
        candidate instead of simply voting for their favorite, thus complicating 
        the election process;
Whereas a voter's first choice vote may end up thrown out if their candidate 
        receives the lowest number of first choice votes;
Whereas the possibility that a vote doesn't count creates disenfranchisement 
        with the electoral process;
Whereas ranked choice voting requires multiple rounds until a candidate receives 
        more than 50 percent of the vote, prolonging the time it takes to 
        complete the election;
Whereas the complicated process leads to voter confusion;
Whereas the increase in voting rounds may lead to counting errors;
Whereas ranked choice voting has been banned by the States of Florida, 
        Tennessee, South Dakota, Montana, and Idaho;
Whereas candidates who would have won under traditional election rules have been 
        shown to lose under the ranked choice voting system; and
Whereas implementing ranked choice voting systems on a large scale would require 
        hefty financial investment to update voting equipment: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives believes States 
attempting to implement ranked choice voting systems on a wide scale 
should evaluate the underlying agenda that is driving the 
implementation of ranked choice voting systems.
                                 <all>
```
§ 720.42 Policy. ( a ) It is Department of the Navy policy to cooperate, as prescribed in this instruction, with courts and federal, state and local officials in enforcing court orders. The Department of the Navy will cooperate with requests when such action is consistent with mission requirements (including operational readiness), the provisions of applicable international agreements, and ongoing Department of Defense (DoD) investigations and courts-martial.
( b ) Every reasonable effort will be made to resolve the matter without the respondent returning to the United States, or other action being taken against the respondent under this instruction.
( c ) Requests to return members for felonies or for contempt involving unlawful or contemptuous removal of a child from the jurisdiction of a court or the custody of a parent or other person awarded custody by a court order will normally be granted, but only if the member cannot resolve the issue with the court without return to the United States. When the member's return is inconsistent with mission requirements, applicable international agreements, or ongoing DoD investigations or courts-martial, DoD approval of denial will be requested.
( d ) For all other requests involving members, return will be based on the circumstances of the individual case as provided in this instruction.
( e ) Members will normally be returned on a temporary additional duty (TAD) basis unless there are compelling reasons the return should be a permanent change of duty station (PCS).
( f ) The involuntary return of employees or family members in response to a request for return is not authorized. However, the following action will be taken: ( 1 ) Employees will be strongly urged to comply with court orders. Failure to comply with court orders involving felonies or contempt involving unlawful or contemptuous removal of a child from the jurisdiction of the court or the custody of a parent or other person awarded custody by a court order will normally require processing for adverse action, up to and including removal from federal service. Failure to comply with other court orders may require adverse action, depending on the circumstances of the individual case.
( 2 ) Family members will be strongly encouraged to comply with court orders. Family members who fail to comply with court orders involving felonies or contempt involving unlawful or contemptuous removal of a child from the jurisdiction of the court or the custody of a parent or other person awarded custody by a court order will normally have their command sponsorship removed. Failure to comply with other court orders may also result in removal of command sponsorship, depending on the circumstances of the individual case.
( g ) To facilitate prompt resolution of requests for return of members, minimize the burden on operating units, and to provide consistency during initial implementation of this new program, a limited number of responsible officials, designated in § 720.44, will respond to requesting officials.
March 11, 2010

The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood:
. On behalfofKintetsu International, I am writing to express our strong support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for ourregion, where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are over 500 Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whosebusiness models rely on access to Japan and it'smarket. The growth ofourbusiness ties with Japan has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Ourbusiness travelers look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. \. 'Detroit is aproven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can supporttrans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Deltamade to DTWto make it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit ourbusiness travelers. ' Thank you for consideration ofthis request. Sincerely, 

# L0JL
·FrankLee President Kintetsu International

www.kintetsLl.com Chicago Cincinnati Los Angeles New Jersey New York San Jose
H. Res. 1611 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 9, 2024. 

Resolved, That a revised edition of the Rules and Manual 

of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress be printed as a House document, and that 

three thousand additional copies shall be printed and bound 

for the use of the House of Representatives, of which nine 

hundred eighty copies shall be bound in leather with thumb 

index and delivered as may be directed by the Parliamentarian of the House. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### STATE v. SMITH

No. 374P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 832

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 September 1997.
Exhibit 23





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Stora Enso Oyj (Stora Enso Corporation) filed herewith
of our report dated September 13, 2002 relating to the financial statements of
SENA 401(k) Plan, which appear in this Form 11-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

September 29, 2003
|                                                                                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Page In-Progress**				This page is currently being worked on.  Please check back later.NPS Home |
Exhibit 23.2

LEE KEELING AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS



|                                     |  |                                
|------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------
|TULSA OFFICE                         |  | HOUSTON OFFICE                 
|First Place Tower                    |  | Kellog Brown and Root Tower    
|15 East Fifth Street  Suite 3500    |  | 601 Jefferson Ave.  Suite 3790
|Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-4350           |  | Houston, Texas 77002-7912      
|(918) 587-5521  Fax: (918) 587-2881 |  | (713) 651-8006  Fax: 754-4934 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

As independent petroleum engineers, Lee Keeling and Associates, Inc. hereby consents to all references to our firm included in or made a part of the EXCO
Resources, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and further consents to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-132551, 333-156086 and 333-146376) and the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-142361 and 333-145885) of EXCO Resources, Inc. of information from our reserve report dated February 5, 2009 on the estimated proved oil and natural reserve quantities of EXCO Resources,
Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries presented as of December 31, 2008.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|                                    
|/s/ Lee Keeling and Associates, Inc.
|LEE KEELING AND ASSOCIATES, INC.    

Tulsa, Oklahoma

February 26, 2009