alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |        |                                                                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                               |   |
|   |   | /s/ H.      Craig Dees                                                        |   |
|   |   | H.      Craig Dees, Ph.D.                                                     |   |
|   |   | Chief      Executive Officer Provectus      Pharmaceuticals, Inc.   |   |
|   |   |                                                                               |   |

|   |        |                                                                                      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                      |   |
|        |   | /s/ Peter      R. Culpepper                                                          |   |
|   |   | Peter      R. Culpepper                                                                   |   |
|   |   | Chief      Financial OfficerChief Operating Officer Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  |   |
|   |   |                                                                                      |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy Carolinas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Carolinas.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    JAMES E.
ROGERS 
|James E. Rogers        
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 13, 2009
Exhibit 31.2     

> 
Certification

 

I, Donald A. French, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of UQM      Technologies, Inc.:
2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not      contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material      fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances      under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the      period covered by this annual report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and      other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present      in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations      and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in      this annual report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for      the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or      caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the      registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us      by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which      this annual report is being prepared;
b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's      disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and      procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report      based on such evaluation; and
c.
Disclosed in this annual report any change in the      registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred      during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's      fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's      internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over      financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit      committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing      the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in      the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which      are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to      record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves      management or other employees who have a significant role in the      registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
Date:  May 16, 2007
/s/ Donald A. French  
Donald A. French  
Treasurer, Secretary and  
Chief Financial Officer
§ 651.20 Environmental assessment. An EA is intended to assist agency planning and decision-making. While required to assess environmental impacts and evaluate their significance, it is routinely used as a planning document to evaluate environmental impacts, develop alternatives and mitigation measures, and allow for agency and public participation. It: ( a ) Briefly provides the decision maker with sufficient evidence and analysis for determining whether a FNSI or an EIS should be prepared.
( b ) Assures compliance with NEPA, if an EIS is not required and a CX is inappropriate.
( c ) Facilitates preparation of an EIS, if required.
( d ) Includes brief discussions of the need for the proposed action, alternatives to the proposed action (NEPA, section 102(2)(e)), environmental impacts, and a listing of persons and agencies consulted (see subpart E of this part for requirements).
( e ) The EA provides the proponent, the public, and the decision maker with sufficient evidence and analysis for determining whether environmental impacts of a proposed action are potentially significant. An EA is substantially less rigorous and costly than an EIS, but requires sufficient detail to identify and ascertain the significance of expected impacts associated with the proposed action and its alternatives. The EA can often provide the required “hard look” at the potential environmental effects of an action, program, or policy within 1 to 25 pages, depending upon the nature of the action and project-specific conditions.
#### Jerome Conway, Appellant, v. Pablo Rivera, Respondent.

Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case in a personal injury action reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial directed, with costs to abide the event. Since the issue before the court was whether plaintiff had been struck by one of the vehicles as a result of the accident, the statement in respondent’s accident report that the Roger vehicle (Car No. 2) “mounted sidewalk and struck a pedestrian” is material and its exclusion was error. The accident report supplies a vital link in plaintiff’s chain of proof. Respondent’s admission constituted original evidence. *(Gangi*v. *Fradus,*227 N. Y. 452; Richardson, Evidence [8th ed.], § 288.) Other evidence enabled the jury to find that plaintiff was the pedestrian and that immediately after the occurrence he was transported by ambulance to Lincoln Hospital for emergency treatment. A prima facie ease was thus established. Further, the statement was admissible to impeach the testimony of the declarant since it was a statement inconsistent with his testimony. “The proof need not be *‘*direct and positive contradiction ’ ° * * it is enough if it be *656inconsistent with, testimony or tend to prove different facts *(Larkin*v. *Nassau Elec. R. R. Co.,*205 N. Y. 267, 269; *Kesten*v. *Forbes,*273 App. Div. 646); or ‘material inconsistencies’ *(Nagel*v. *Paige,*264 App. Div. 231).” *(McCoy*v. *Gorenstein,*282 App. Div. 984-985.) Concur—Breitel, J. P., McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.; Stevens, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
### §3938. Child custody protection

#### (a) Duration of temporary custody order based on certain deployments

If a court renders a temporary order for custodial responsibility for a child based solely on a deployment or anticipated deployment of a parent who is a servicemember, the court shall require that the temporary order shall expire not later than the period justified by the deployment of the servicemember.

#### (b) Limitation on consideration of member's deployment in determination of child's best interest

If a motion or a petition is filed seeking a permanent order to modify the custody of the child of a servicemember, no court may consider the absence of the servicemember by reason of deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole factor in determining the best interest of the child.

#### (c) No Federal jurisdiction or right of action or removal

Nothing in this section shall create a Federal right of action or otherwise give rise to Federal jurisdiction or create a right of removal.

#### (d) Preemption

In any case where State law applicable to a child custody proceeding involving a temporary order as contemplated in this section provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent who is a deploying servicemember than the rights provided under this section with respect to such temporary order, the appropriate court shall apply the higher State standard.

#### (e) Deployment defined

In this section, the term "deployment" means the movement or mobilization of a servicemember to a location for a period of longer than 60 days and not longer than 540 days pursuant to temporary or permanent official orders—

(1) that are designated as unaccompanied;

(2) for which dependent travel is not authorized; or

(3) that otherwise do not permit the movement of family members to that location.

(Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, title II, §208, as added Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title V, §566(a), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3384.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 528 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

                                                        

**Form 6-K**

                                                       

 

**REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER**

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of 

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

December 1, 2005

 

**CRUCELL N.V.**

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

P.O. Box 2048 Archimedesweg 4 2333 CN Leiden The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)

000-30962

(Commission File Number)                                                        

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F  X             Form 40-F__ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Yes__                                           No X

 

 

 

----
NUMBER 13-10-00574-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

GLORIA SALINAS YBARRA, FELIPE YBARRA JR., 

AND MELODY GARCIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

AS NEXT FRIENDS OR REPRESENTATIVES/HEIRS 

OF THE ESTATE OF ALYSSA YBARRA, DECEASED, Appellants,

v.

CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL BEEVILLE, 

CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM 

CORPORATION, RAYMOND LEWANDOWSKI JR.,

CHILDREN'S PHYSICIAN SERVICES OF 

SOUTH TEXAS D/B/A DRISCOLL CHILDREN'S 

GENETIC CENTER, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from 36th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
2

On September 14, 2011, appellant filed a brief that was not in compliance with the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief failed generally to comply with the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(k).

On October 27, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief failed to 

comply with Rule 38.1 (k) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it does not 

contain an appendix as required by Rule 38.1(k). See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. Appellant 

was directed to file an appendix in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure within ten days of the date of the letter, and notified that if an appendix was not 

filed, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as 

if appellant had failed to file a brief, under which circumstances the Court may affirm the 

judgment or dismiss the appeal. See Id. 38.9(a), 42.3(b),(c). Appellant failed to 

respond to the Court’s notice.

Accordingly, we strike appellant=s non-conforming brief and order the appeal 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 

42.3(b)(c). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 15th

day of December, 2011.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1336 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1336

Calling on Vice President Kamala D. Harris to convene and mobilize the 
   principal officers of the executive departments of the Cabinet to 
activate section 4 of the 25th Amendment to declare President Joseph R. 
     Biden incapable of executing the duties of his office and to 
            immediately exercise powers as Acting President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2024

   Mr. Roy (for himself and Mr. Higgins of Louisiana) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Calling on Vice President Kamala D. Harris to convene and mobilize the 
   principal officers of the executive departments of the Cabinet to 
activate section 4 of the 25th Amendment to declare President Joseph R. 
     Biden incapable of executing the duties of his office and to 
            immediately exercise powers as Acting President.

Whereas President Joseph R. Biden has repeatedly and publicly demonstrated his 
        inability to discharge the powers and duties of the Presidency, 
        including, among others, the powers and duties of the Commander-in-
        Chief: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls upon Vice 
President Kamala D. Harris--
            (1) to immediately use her powers under section 4 of the 
        25th Amendment to convene and mobilize the principal officers 
        of the executive departments in the Cabinet to declare that 
        President Joseph R. Biden is unable to discharge the duties and 
        powers of the office; and
            (2) to transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate 
        and the Speaker of the House of Representatives notice that she 
        will be immediately assuming the powers and duties of the 
        office as Acting President.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL FOREST-DEPENDENT RURAL COMMUNITIES
### §1597. Agent's acts as binding principal

When construing and enforcing the provisions of this chapter, the act, omission, or failure of any officer, agent, or other person acting for or employed by any person, partnership, corporation, company, society, or association, shall in every case be also deemed to be the act, omission, or failure of such person, partnership, corporation, company, society, or association, as well as that of the person employed.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title IV, §407, 53 Stat. 1286.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

See section 1610 of this title.
#### § 37.1365 Supplies.

Tangible property other than real property and equipment. Supplies have a useful life of less than one year or an acquisition cost of less than $5,000 per unit.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 167 DB 2020 (No. 106 RST 2020)

:

JOSEPH FRANK CHVASTA, JR. : Attorney Registration No. 44739

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM RETIRED STATUS : (Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7

th day of January, 2021, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated December 30, 2020, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Joseph Frank Chvasta, Jr., who has been on Retired Status, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, 

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing 

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
#### Long Island Rail Road Company, Petitioner, v New York State Human Rights Appeal Board et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 28,1978, which (1) vacated an order of the State Division of Human Rights which dismissed the complaint upon a finding of no probable cause; and (2) remanded the proceeding to the State Division "for such further and other proceedings pursuant to the Human Rights Law.” Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The appeal board order, though nonfinal, is reviewable by this court as of right (see *Wyckoff Hgts. Hosp. v State Div. of Human Rights,*38 AD2d 596 [cf. *New York Urban League v Speer,*40 AD2d 689]). We have considered the other points raised by the petitioner and deem them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1238 

Supporting the designation of May 17, 2024, as ‘‘Endangered Species Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2024 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself, Mr. BEYER, and Mr. GRIJALVA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of May 17, 2024, as 

‘‘Endangered Species Day’’. 

Whereas plants and wildlife provide incalculable services for 

humankind, including health, cultural, economic, recreational, and spiritual benefits, among others; 

Whereas, in the United States and around the world, more 

than 2,300 species are recognized as at risk of extinction 

now or in the foreseeable future, and many more are experiencing declines in populations and future viability; 

Whereas the planet is experiencing a biodiversity crisis, which 

many scientists conclude is the sixth mass extinction 

event, with plant and wildlife species across the globe facing heightened risk of extinction that is largely driven by 

human activity; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1238 IH 

Whereas climate change, large-scale changes in land use, and 

habitat destruction pose existential threats to species; 

Whereas the United States has prioritized the conservation 

and recovery of imperiled species by enacting the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and other landmark conservation statutes; 

Whereas conservation and protection efforts implemented 

under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 have successfully prevented the extinction of more than 99 percent of 

species designated as threatened or endangered, including 

the critically imperiled California condor, whooping crane, 

and black-footed ferret; 

Whereas many at-risk species have significant cultural and 

subsistence values to Tribal, indigenous, and Native Alaskan communities, whose Tribal leadership, ancestral 

lands, and traditional ecological knowledge play an invaluable role in species conservation and recovery; 

Whereas the United States has the opportunity to stem 

threats to endangered and threatened species by enacting 

and implementing bold policies and conservation initiatives, including conserving at least 30 percent each of the 

Nation’s lands and waters by the year 2030; and 

Whereas the recovery of species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 is a remarkable success that should be 

celebrated: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Endangered 

3 Species Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the intrinsic value of plants and 

5 wildlife as part of the United States environmental 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1238 IH 

1 heritage, and the invaluable role that the Endan2 gered Species Act of 1973 has played in safe3 guarding at-risk species; and 

4 (3) acknowledges the continued importance of 

5 the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and other con6 servation measures to protect threatened and endan7 gered species and address the biodiversity crisis. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB