alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

TO: The Director of Student Privacy Policy Office

FROM: The Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development 

SUBJECT Delegation of Authority 

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Secretary, delegation control 

number EA/ED/13, certified on April 22, 2020, and subject to the reservations noted 

below, I hereby re-delegate to you, to your successor in function, or to anyone serving 

for you in an acting capacity or delegated the authority to perform the functions and 

duties of your position, the authority to administer the Department’s responsibilities 

under and related to the following statutes and regulations: 

A. the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1232g and 

34 CFR Part 99); 

B. the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1232h and 34 

CFR Part 98); and

C. the Armed Forces Recruiter Access to Students and Student Recruiting 

Information (Title VIII, Part F, Subpart 2, Sec. 8528 of the Elementary and 

Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (20 U.S.C. 7908)). 

Unless otherwise specified in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following are 

not delegated: 

A. the authority to sign Federal Register notices;

B. the authority to award contracts and discretionary grants; 

C. the authority to appoint, and fix compensation of, members of advisory 

councils; and

D. unless otherwise provided by law, the authority to submit reports to Congress 

or the President.
III. REDELEGATION

Subject to the provisions of the Acts, and unless otherwise noted, you may re-delegate 

the authorities delegated to you. All re-delegations must be prepared in accordance with 

the Administrative Communications System directive, OM: 1-102: Delegations of 

Authority. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification of the Department’s Principal Delegations 

Control Officer and supersedes delegation control numbers EM/EMV/413, certified on 

March 28, 2017, and EMV/EMVC/414, certified on March 28, 2017. I hereby ratify 

actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to certification of this 

delegation. 

 James Blew (signed)

OGC Clearance and Date

April 30, 2020

Date Certified: April 30, 2020

Departmental Delegations Control 

Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number: ED/EDS/14 

Deborah Friendly

Date: 2020.04.30 12:49:08 -04'00'
### §13146. Conditional termination

This subchapter shall cease to be effective if the provisions of section 703 of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 (Public Law 101–194, 5 U.S.C. 5318 note) are repealed.

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(c), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4305.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 13146 | (no source) | |

Section

This section is added in accordance with section 603 of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 (Public Law 101–194, 26 U.S.C. 7701 note). Section 603 of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 provides that amendments made by title VI of the Act (103 Stat. 1760) shall cease to be effective if the provisions of section 703 of the Act (5 U.S.C. 5318 note) are repealed, in which case the laws in effect before the amendments made by title VI of the Act shall be deemed to be reenacted. Among other things, the amendments made by title VI of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 enacted a general rewrite of title V of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which is restated as this subchapter. If the provisions of section 703 of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 (Public Law 101–194, 5 U.S.C. 5318 note) are repealed, then this subchapter shall cease to be effective, and the prior provisions of title V of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 shall be deemed to be reenacted. The prior provisions of title V of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (Public Law 95–521, 92 Stat. 1864) relate to an amendment to section 207 of title 18, United States Code, which has previously been executed to text.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         3,286,100
<SECURITIES>                                     250,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,077,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (323,100)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,541,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,212,200
<PP&E>                                         1,490,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (639,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,036,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            806,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                       18,100
<COMMON>                                          21,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,962,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,036,000
<SALES>                                        4,099,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,292,500
<CGS>                                          2,484,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,203,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (910,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     933,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,843,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,843,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.97)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.00
        

</TABLE>
### §2137. Purchase of dogs or cats by research facilities prohibited except from authorized operators of auction sales and licensed dealers or exhibitors

It shall be unlawful for any research facility to purchase any dog or cat from any person except an operator of an auction sale subject to section 2142 of this title or a person holding a valid license as a dealer or exhibitor issued by the Secretary pursuant to this chapter unless such person is exempted from obtaining such license under section 2133 of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–544, §7, Aug. 24, 1966, 80 Stat. 351; Pub. L. 91–579, §8, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1561.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–579 added licensed exhibitors and operators of auction sales subject to section 2142 of this title to the enumeration of persons from whom research facilities may purchase dogs or cats.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–579 effective one year after Dec. 24, 1970, see section 23 of Pub. L. 91–579, set out as a note under section 2131 of this title.
### §512. Construction

Nothing in this chapter, or the amendments made by this chapter, affects the authority of the National Institute of Standards and Technology or the Department of Commerce relating to the development and promulgation of standards or guidelines under paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 278g–3(a) of title 15.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title X, §1006, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2273.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, known as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
TO:SEE ADDRESSEE LIST (BELOW)

FROM:THE GENERAL COUNSEL

# SUBJECT:REDELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO CERTIFY COPIES OF ED RECORDS

## I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation to all Principal Officers from the Assistant Secretary for Management EM/GEN/8, certified on May 25, 2004, I re-delegate to you, anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, and your successor in function, the authority to certify true copies of any books, records, papers, and other documents on file in the Department, or of extracts from  such documents; to certify that true copies are copies of the actual file; to certify the complete, original record of a Department file; to certify that Department files do not contain particular records, and to cause the seal of the Department to be affixed to such certification.  This delegation authorizes each addressee to certify copies of documents within his or her respective area of responsibility.  

Unless otherwise specified in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority delegated herein are included within the scope of the delegation.

## II. RESERVATIONS

None.

## III. REDELEGATION

No further re-delegation is authorized.

## IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification of the Department’s Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority, including, but not limited to, delegation EG/GEN/108, certified on December 4, 2007.

When an authorized official certifies a document to be a true copy of a document on file in the Department, he or she shall do so by causing the impression of the Department seal to be affixed to a certification form which shall be the top sheet of the copy being certified.  The attached “Certification of True Copy” form has been designated for this purpose.

Documents shall be appropriately signed before being presented for impression.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees prior to certification of this delegation.

___________/s_________

Steven Menashi

Acting General Counsel

Attachment

OGC Concurrence and Date: Debbie Friendly; 7/21/2017

Certified Date: 7/31/2017

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number:EG/Gen/124

ADDRESSEES:

Deputy General Counsels

Assistant General Counsels

Deputy Assistant General Counsels

## ATTACHMENT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Certification of True Copy

Pursuant to the provisions of 20 U.S.C. 3485 and the authority vested in me by a delegation from the General Counsel, I hereby certify that the annexed are true copies of the documents on file in the Department of Education.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the Department of Education to be affixed on this _______________ day of ____________, 20__.
### §178a. Definitions

As used in this subchapter—

(a) The term "State" means each of the fifty States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

(b) The term "Secretaries" means the Secretary of Agriculture and/or the Secretary of Commerce acting each separately or jointly.

(c) The term "commercialization" means the stage in the development or advancement of a technology at which point private enterprise is willing to invest in a full-scale production facility.

(d) The term "native" means hydrocarbon-containing plants and other agricultural crops of strategic and industrial importance which may be cultured in North America, especially plants which are members of the genus Parthenium known as Guayule.

(Pub. L. 95–592, §3, Nov. 4, 1978, 92 Stat. 2529; Pub. L. 98–284, §3, May 16, 1984, 98 Stat. 181.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 98–284, §3(a), inserted "and other agricultural crops of strategic and industrial importance" and "plants which are".

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 98–284, §3(b), struck out subsec. (e) which defined "Regional Commissions" as the Regional Action Planning Commissions established pursuant to title V of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965.
EWP FINANCIAL LLC                                           5430 LBJ Freeway
                                                            Suite 1700
                                                            Dallas, TX 75240
                                                            972-450-4261
                                                            972-448-1445 (Fax)


                                  July 31, 2005





Mr. Bert E. Downing, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.
5430 LBJ Freeway Suite 1740
Dallas TX 75240




 Dear Mr. Downing:



With regard to the  Debtor-In-Possession  Credit Agreement between EWP Financial
LLC and Keystone  Consolidated  Industries,  Inc.  dated  February 27, 2004,  as
amended, the definition of Expiration Date, as set forth in the Second Amendment
to the Debtor-In-Possession  Agreement, is hereby amended to replace the date of
July 31, 2005 in clause (a) (i) of such definition with August 31, 2005.



 Sincerely,

/s/Bob O'Brien
------------------------------------------------------
Bob O'Brien
Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 12

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                       AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DIVIDENDS

                          (in thousands, except ratios)

                                                            For the Three Months
                                                           Ended  March 31, 2005
                                                                (unaudited)
                                                           ---------------------

Net income                                                         $5,732
                                                                   ======
Fixed charges:
      Audit fees                                                       33
      Trustee fees                                                     30
      Administrative and consulting fees                              285
                                                                   ------
Total fixed charges                                                   348
                                                                   ------
Earnings before fixed charges                                      $6,080
Fixed charges, as above                                               348
                                                                   ------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                  17.47
                                                                   ------
Preferred securities dividend                                          --
                                                                       --
Fixed charges including preferred securities dividends             $  348
                                                                   ------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
  securities dividend                                               17.47
                                                                   ------
I

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-16T12:38:48-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Exhibit 32b

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of International Bancshares Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Imelda Navarro, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



By:

/s/ IMELDA NAVARRO Imelda Navarro TreasurerDate: March 1, 2010


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether on and before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF THE ELDER-BEERMAN STORES CORP. FOR THE
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MAY 2, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

THIS SCHEDULE SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 11 OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND
SECTION 323 OF THE TRUST INDENTURE ACT OF 1939, OR OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE
LIABILITIES OF SUCH SECTIONS, NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY REGISTRATION
STATEMENT TO WHICH IT RELATES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                           6,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,883
<INVENTORY>                                    154,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               299,471
<PP&E>                                          62,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 377,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,832
<BONDS>                                        153,059
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       201,031
<OTHER-SE>                                    (55,759)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   377,165
<SALES>                                        126,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,222
<CGS>                                           91,827
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,577
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (710)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (274)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (436)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (436)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
§ 536.133 Reconsideration of UCMJ claims. ( a ) *General.* Although Article 139, UCMJ, does not provide for a right of appeal, either the claimant or a soldier whose pay is assessed may request the approval authority (SPCMCA or GCMCA, depending on the amount assessed) or successor in command to reconsider the action. Either party must submit such a request for reconsideration in writing and clearly state the factual or legal basis for the relief requested. The approval authority may direct that the matter be reinvestigated.
( b ) *Reconsideration by the original approval authority.* The original approval authority may reconsider the action at any time while serving as the approval authority for the claim in question, even after the transfer of the soldier whose pay was assessed. The original approval authority may modify the action if it was incorrect, subject to paragraph (d) of this section. However, the approval authority should modify the action only because of fraud, substantial new evidence, errors in calculation, or mistake of law.
( c ) *Reconsideration by a successor in command.* Subject to paragraph (d) of this section, a successor in command may modify an action only because of fraud, substantial new evidence, errors in calculation, or mistake of law apparent on the face of the record.
( d ) *Legal review and action.* Prior to modifying the original action, the approval authority will have the servicing claims office render a legal opinion and fully explain the basis for modification as part of the file. If the legal review agrees that a return of the assessed pay is appropriate, the approval authority should request in writing that the claimant return the money, setting forth in the letter the basis for the request. There is no authority for repayment from appropriated funds.
( e ) *Disposition of files.* After completing action on reconsideration, the approval authority will forward the reconsideration action to the servicing claims office, which will then file the action per § 536.132(h).
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.225

[WILSHIRE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                                                                December 9, 2002

To:     Holders of the Warrants expiring November 28, 2002("Warrants") of
        Wilshire Technologies, Inc. ("Wilshire")

Re:     Expiration of Warrants

Dear Wilshire Warrant Holder:

        The above-mentioned Warrants, which were issued in November of 1997
pursuant to the Warrant Agreement dated as of November 24, 1997 between Wilshire
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company as Warrant Agent, expired by their
terms on November 28, 2002 and, therefore, are worthless.

        If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please contact the
Warrant Agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 6201 15th Avenue,
Brooklyn, New York 11219, Attention: Mr. Joe Alicia (718) 921-8210.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    WILSHIRE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                                    By /s/ KEVIN T. MULVIHILL
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kevin T. Mulvihill
                                       President & Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.81 Delegations of authority. ( a ) *Settlement authority.* ( 1 ) The following individuals have delegated authority to settle, compromise, suspend, or terminate action on claims asserted for $100,000 or less and to accept full payment on any claim: ( i ) The Judge Advocate General.
( ii ) The Deputy Judge Advocate General.
( iii ) The Director of Civil Law.
( iv ) Chief, Deputy Chief, and Branch Chiefs, Claims and Tort Litigation Staff.
( 2 ) Installation staff judge advocates have authority to assert claims in any amount, accept full payment on any claim and to compromise, suspend or terminate action on claims asserted for $25,000 or less.
( b ) *Redelegation of authority.* A settlement authority may redelegate it to a subordinate judge advocate or civilian attorney, in writing.
( c ) *Authority to reduce, withdraw, or restore settlement authority.* Any superior settlement authority may reduce, withdraw, or restore delegated authority.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83696, Nov. 22, 2016]