alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# -^FORT

DODG E Regiona l Airpor t 

### FOR T DODG E REGIONA LAIRPOR T



## 163 9 Nelso n Avenue , Suite 2 • For t Dodge , l A 5050 1 515.573.388 1 - Ext . 3 • Mairport@fortdodgeiowa.org

May3 , 201 1 Denni s J . DeVany , Chie f EA S & Domesti cAnalysi s Divisio n Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Wasiiington , D.C . 2059 0 RE : ESSENTIA L AI R SERVIC E COMMENTS Orde r2011-1-1 2 Docke t DOT-OST-2001-1068 2 Dea rMr . DeVany , o •s= r Th e For t Dodg e Airpor t Commission , Cit yo f For t Dodge , an d communitie s i n ou r"regio n o f Iow a exten d ou r suppor t fo rth e proposal s submitte d b yMesab a Aviation , Inc . d/b/ a a s Delt a Connectio n an d Chautauqu a Airlines , d/b/ a a s Frontier . Th e proposa l b

yMesab a Aviatio n provide s ou rcommunit ywit h th e qualit yo f ai rservic e an d worldwid e seamles s connectivity . A s yo u know , Mesab a mad e improvement s t o ou rai rservic e i n Jun e 201 0 b y providin g u s wit h direc t flight s an d a bette rtim e schedule . Eve n thoug h w e los t on e dail yfligh t i n exchang e fo rth e direc t flights , th e suppor t fo rthi s chang e wa s reflecte d i n utilizatio n b you rbusinesse s an d community . Enplanement s wer e u p b y50 % a t th e en d o f 201 0 an d ar e u p 85 % fo rth e firs t quarte ro f 2011 . Thes e increase s wer e attaine d wit h onl ytw o dail yflight s compare d t o thre e whic h i s reflectiv e t o th e importanc e o f direc t service , tim e o f departures/arrivals , an d competitiv e fares . Th e downsid e o f th e Mesab a proposa l i s tha t i t i s onl yfo rsi xmonth s an d th e fac t tha t th e SAA B 34 0 aircraf t i s bein g remove d fro m thei rflee t withou t a simila rsiz e aircraf t a s a replacement . Chautauqu a Airlines ' proposa l i s als o supporte d b yth e communit ydu e t o th e overwhelmin g suppor t fo ra je t aircraft , lo wairfare s t o majo rdestinations , an d connectivit ywit h ful l interlin e agreement s wit h ove r2 0 airlines . Thi s proposa l woul d als o mee t th e need s o f ou rcommunity . Than k yo u fo rth e opportunit yt o submi t ou rcomment s regardin g th e selectio n o f th e EA S carrier . Respectfully ,

i . Rhond a M . Chamber s Directo ro f Aviatio n Cc : Mesaba Airline s Delta Airline s Frontie rAirline s Senato rCharle s Grassle

y Senato rTo m Harki n Congressma n To m Latha m Airpor t Commissio n Mayo rMatt Bemric h an d Counci l Members . Cit yof For t Dodg e Cit yManage rDavi d Fierk

e Iow a Departmen t o

f Transportatio n For t Dodg e Chambe rof Commerc e Developmen t Corporatio n o f For t Dodg e an d Webste rCount y
1

Order filed February 27, 2014.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00901

- CV

____________ BARBARA ULMER , Appellant

V.

DEREK ANTHONY JENKIN S, SR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 2012

- 44247



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed November 23, 2013

. On December 5, 2013, appellant notified this court that she had requested supplementation of the clerk’s
record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c )

. To date, the supplemental cle rk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, we issue the following order:
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s
record on or before March 14, 2014 , containing the following:2

1. Respondent Barbara Ulmer’s Request for Find ings of Fact and Conclusions of law, filed on or about August 13, 2013;
2. Respondent Bara Ulmer’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, filed on or about August 13, 2013;
3. Respondent Barbara Ulmer’s Notice of Past Due Findings of Fact and Conclusi ons of Law, filed on or about September 3, 2013; and
4. The trial court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
If any omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified st atement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
#### American and African Trading Corporation, Appellant, v. Elias Saka et al., Respondents.

Order entered on May 2, 1962, granting defendant-respondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion denied. For more than five years, plaintiff was unable to proceed with this action for fraudulent conspiracy because it could not locate, and serve, a codefendant, who was believd to be a necessary party, although not an indispensable party in the technical sense. The alleged conspiracy involved a successful devious scheme to substitute all but valueless goods for expensive electronic machinery in foreign export trade. Recently, one of the respondents was tried in a Federal court for tax evasion; only then did plaintiff learn that the missing codefendant was nonexistent, the name being only an alias of the respondent. Promptly, plaintiff sought to proceed with this action. Neither the fraud nor the recent discovery is in issue on this appeal. Thus, prosecution of the action was stalled, not through lack of diligence, but because defendants-respondents’ alleged fraud, if true, deceived plaintiff into believing that a procedural defect would defeat the action. Although the alleged *922fraud which grounds the action was discovered more than five years ago, and the cause of action may be said to have accrued then, an additional undiscovered element of the same fraudulent scheme constituted an effective bar against recovery. Indeed, in a practical sense then plaintiff only recently discovered a significant element in the fraud, namely, that the third conspirator was nonexistent. In light of these unusual facts, arguably no principle of diligent prosecution is served by dismissing the action. Plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of any doubt in the circumstances. Moreover, respondents were given notice of the claim when the action was commenced and, since the nonexistent conspirator was named as a party, they were undoubtedly aware that their fraud was still partially successful. Concur •—- Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### § 203.7 Eligible applicants.

Eligible applicants are community members of RABs or TRCs. Furthermore, the RABs or TRCs must be comprised of at least three community members to ensure community interests are broadly represented. The applicant must certify that the request represents the wishes of a simple majority of the community members of the RAB or TRC. Certification includes, but is not limited to, the results of a roll call vote of community members of the RAB or TRC documented in the meeting minutes. Other requirements of the application are detailed in § 203.9 of this part.
The name and address of the applicant is:

James C Suss

1727 Brandon Lee Way SW

Marietta, Georgia 30008

Mobile: 678-357-7683

email: jim.suss@harrynorman.com

Regulations from which the exemption is requested: 

14 CFR Part 21

14 CFR 45.23 (b)

14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) 

14 CFR 91.7 (a)

14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2)

14 CFR 91.103

14 CFR 91.109

14 CFR 91.119

14 CFR 91.121

14 CFR 91.151 (a)

14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 

14 CFR 91.405 (a)

14 CFR 407 (a) (1)

14 CFR 409 (a) (2)

14 CFR 417 (a) & (b)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Byron L. Bergren, President and Chief Executive Officer of The
Elder-Beerman Stores Corp., (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1. The amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the year
ended May 3, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: October 15, 2003      By:  /s/  Byron L. Bergren
                                 ---------------------


                            Name:     Byron L. Bergren
                            Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 86]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ19-16-001]


Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on November 24, 2020, the Hoosier Energy Rural 
Electric Cooperative, Inc. submitted its tariff filing: Compliance 
Filing for the October 26th Order to be effective 11/25/2020.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the 
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three 
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, 
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency 
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the 
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#63252631202c0d0f0a0d06301613130c111723050611004d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="10565542535f7e7c797e75436560607f626450767562733e777f66">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll-free, 
(886) 208-3676 or TYY, (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link 
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail 
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in 
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 18, 2021.

    Dated: December 28, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-29073 Filed 12-31-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 14(a)(2)

[BDO/ ZIV HAFT LETTERHEAD]

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the inclusion in
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Scitex Corporation Ltd. (Scitex) for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Annual Report), and to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Scitex on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-34233, Registration No. 33-46861, Registration No. 33-87614,
Registration No. 33-97622, Registration No. 33-97624 and Registration No. 33-39364), of
our Report dated February 28, 2005, with respect to the financial statements of Jemtex Ink
Jet Printing Ltd. as of December 31, 2004.

|Tel-Aviv, IsraelJune 28, 2005 |  | Sincerely,/s/ Ziv HaftZiv HaftCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)BDO member firm
|----------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 6, 2006

|MS Structured Asset Corp.                         
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

|Delaware                                        | 333-64879                 | 13-4026700                        
|----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                                               
|(State or Other Jurisdiction  of Incorporation) | (Commission File  Number) | (IRS Employer  Identification No.)



|1585 Broadway, Second Floor  New York, New York  Attention: Madhu Philips | 10036     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------
|                                                                         
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                                  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

|Not Applicable                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





---







Section 8Other Events



| | Item 8.01 | Other Events
| | --------- | ------------



On February 2, 2006, the Company issued a press release regarding the occurrence of a Trust Wind-Up Event under the terms of the Trust Agreement governing SATURNS Trust No. 2001-8, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.





| |  | 
| |  | 





---







SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.



Date: February 6, 2006

MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.

(Registrant)

By: /s/ Madhu Philips

Name:     Madhu Philips
Title:     Vice President





| |  | 
| |  | 





---







EXHIBIT INDEX

|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release, dated February 2, 2006
|------------ | -------------------------------------







| |  | 
| |  | 





---
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 16-1682

Filed July 19, 2017

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

TERENCE LONDON WALKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, George L. 

Stigler, Judge.

Terence Walker challenges by writ of certiorari the denial of his motion to 

correct an illegal sentence. WRIT ANNULLED.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Robert P. Ranschau, 

Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Louis S. Sloven, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Tabor and Mullins, JJ.
2

MULLINS, Judge.

A jury found Terrence Walker guilty of robbery in the second degree and 

burglary in the second degree. In 2014, he was sentenced to indeterminate 

prison terms of ten years on each offense, to be served concurrently, requiring 

he serve a mandatory minimum of seventy percent before parole eligibility on the 

robbery conviction. On August 12, 2016, Walker filed a motion to correct an 

illegal sentence, claiming, under legislation effective July 1, 2016, his

conviction—and therefore his sentence—should be for robbery in the third 

degree. The State resisted, and the district court denied the motion without 

setting it for a hearing.

Walker appealed the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, 

arguing counsel was ineffective in not ensuring Walker had the benefit of a 

hearing on his motion and that denial of his motion without an evidentiary hearing 

was a denial of due process.1 See State v. Ondayog, 722 N.W.2d 778, 784 

(Iowa 2006) (“Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims are not bound by 

traditional error-preservation rules.”). Our supreme court treated his appeal as a 

petition for writ of certiorari and granted the petition. See State v. Propps, ___ 

N.W.2d ___, ___, 2017 WL 2291380, at *3 (Iowa 2017) (“[I]f a case is initiated by 

a notice of appeal, but another form of review is proper, we may choose to 

proceed as though the proper form of review was requested by the defendant 

rather than dismiss the action.”). Walker argues that at an evidentiary hearing he 

 

1

“Normally, ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims are considered in postconviction 

relief proceedings.” State v. Vance, 790 N.W.2d 775, 785 (Iowa 2010). When, as here,

the record is sufficient to address an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, we resolve 

the claim on direct appeal. Id. 
3

would have had the opportunity to develop facts to support his motion. But his 

brief on appeal does not identify any facts that would have or should have been 

presented and cites no legal authority that the legislature’s adoption of robbery in 

the third degree requires reduction of his robbery conviction or reduction of his 

sentence. His argument that he was denied due process requires—at the very 

least—he assert that provision of a greater process would have the potential to

benefit him in obtaining his requested relief.

Pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(a) and (e), we annul the writ.

WRIT ANNULLED.
Exhibit 10.3

CONSULTING AGREEMENT

This Consulting Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered into between NUMARK CAPITAL CORPORATION (the "Consultant") and the Client identified on the signature page
to this Agreement (the "Client").

RECITALS

AGREEMENT

Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth in this Agreement, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as follows:



---





2

---



3

---

4

---

SIGNATURES

By signing below, the parties agree to the terms of this Agreement and further certify that their respective signatories are duly authorized to execute this
Agreement.

|August 15, 2002Date                  |                                              |                                | 
|------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------ | 
|NUMARK CAPITAL CORPORATIONConsultant |                                              | PROVECTUS CORPORATIONClient   
|                                     | Nunzio Valerie, Jr., PresidentName and Title |                                | 
|                                     | Signature                                    |                                | 
|Address for Notices:                 |                                              | Address for Notices:          
|                                     | 14 Angels Path, Webster, NY 14580            |                                | 
|                                     |                                              |                                | 
|(585) 671-6247Telephone Number       |                                              | (865) 769-4011Telephone Number

5

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit (32)(a)**

Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of The Empire District Electric Company (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William L. Gipson, asChief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| **By**                                         | **  /s/ William L. Gipson** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------|
| Name: William L. Gipson                        |
| Title: President and Chief Executive Officer   |
|                                           |
| Date:     May 9, 2007 |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to The Empire District Electric Company and will beretained by The Empire District Electric Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### § 536.95 Reconsideration of Non-Scope Claims Act claims.

The provisions of § 536.89 addressing reconsideration apply and are incorporated herein by reference. If the claim is not cognizable under the Federal Tort Claims Act, appellate procedures under the Military Claims Act or NGCA apply.
EXHIBIT 15

August 5, 2009

El Paso Electric Company

El
Paso, Texas



|Re: | Registration Statement Nos. 333-17971, 333-82129, 333-123646, 333-142557, and 333-151021
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated August 5, 2009 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent
registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
§ 196.420 Access to schools operated by LEAs. A recipient that is a local educational agency shall not, on the basis of sex, exclude any person from admission to: ( a ) Any institution of vocational education operated by such recipient; or
( b ) Any other school or educational unit operated by such recipient, unless such recipient otherwise makes available to such person, pursuant to the same policies and criteria of admission, courses, services, and facilities comparable to each course, service, and facility offered in or through such schools.