alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 We, Jeffrey A. Ludrof, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Philip A.
Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Jeffrey A. LudrofJeffrey A. LudrofPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Philip A. GarciaPhilip A. GarciaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 August 20, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Erie Family Life
Insurance Company and will be retained by Erie Family Life Insurance Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### §1639i. Federal preemption

#### (a) Definition of food

In this subchapter, the term "food" has the meaning given the term in section 321 of title 21.

#### (b) Federal preemption

No State or a political subdivision of a State may directly or indirectly establish under any authority or continue in effect as to any food or seed in interstate commerce any requirement relating to the labeling of whether a food (including food served in a restaurant or similar establishment) or seed is genetically engineered (which shall include such other similar terms as determined by the Secretary of Agriculture) or was developed or produced using genetic engineering, including any requirement for claims that a food or seed is or contains an ingredient that was developed or produced using genetic engineering.

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title II, §295, as added Pub. L. 114–216, §1, July 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 838.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Provident Financial Group, Inc.'s 10-K/A for December 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         274,521
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,720
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,381,707
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      5,051,842
<ALLOWANCE>                                     71,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,106,859
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,696,298
<SHORT-TERM>                                   806,125
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            289,938
<LONG-TERM>                                    688,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        12,482
<OTHER-SE>                                     606,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,106,859
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                492,114
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               78,826
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   872
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               571,812
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             221,449
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             309,212
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          262,600
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   44,750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               9,713
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                225,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                164,530
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     107,437
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,437
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.03
<LOANS-NON>                                     46,419
<LOANS-PAST>                                     9,811
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   377
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 31,798
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                66,693
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   51,373
<RECOVERIES>                                    10,096
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               71,980
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            71,980
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
### §1986. Conflicts of interests

#### (a) Acceptance of fees, commissions, gifts, or other considerations prohibited

No officer, attorney, or other employee of the Secretary shall, directly or indirectly, be the beneficiary of or receive any fee, commission, gift, or other consideration for or in connection with any transaction or business under this chapter other than such salary, fee, or other compensation as he may receive as such officer, attorney, or employee.

#### (b) Acquisition of interest in land by certain officers or employees of Department of Agriculture prohibited; 3-year period

Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture who acts on or reviews an application made by any person under this chapter for a loan to purchase land may acquire, directly or indirectly, any interest in such land for a period of three years after the date on which such action is taken or such review is made. This prohibition shall not apply to a former member of a county committee upon a determination by the Secretary, prior to the acquisition of such interest, that such former member acted in good faith when acting on or reviewing such application.

#### (c) Certifications on loans to family members prohibited

No member of a county committee shall knowingly make or join in making any certification with respect to a loan to purchase any land in which he or any person related to him within the second degree of consanguinity or affinity has or may acquire any interest or with respect to any applicant related to him within the second degree of consanguinity or affinity.

#### (d) Penalties

Any persons violating any provision of this section shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $2,000 or imprisonment for not more than two years, or both.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §336, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 316; Pub. L. 98–258, title VI, §606, Apr. 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 140; Pub. L. 107–171, title V, §5501(b), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 351.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–171 struck out "provided for in section 1982 of this title" after "former member of a county committee".

1984—Pub. L. 98–258 designated first, second, and third sentences of existing provisions as subsecs. (a), (c), and (d), respectively, and added subsec. (b).
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.702 Executive management.

The administrative affairs of the NDRB shall be managed by the Executive Secretary. This responsibility shall include schedules, records, correspondence and issuance of NDRB decisions.
#### Marie Pierre-Louis et al., Respondents, v DeLonghi America, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Antoneen Darden-McCall, Sued Herein as Antoneen Darden and Antoneen McCall, et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Tower Insurance Company of New York, Appellant, v DeLonghi America, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.) Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent, v Antoneen Darden et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. DeLonghi America, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. (Action No. 3.)

[831 NYS2d 730]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries (action No. 1), and two subrogation actions to recover insurance benefits paid to the plaintiffs insured (action Nos. 2 and 3), Antoneen Darden-McCall, sued herein as Antoneen Darden and Antoneen McCall, a defendant in action No. 1 and a defendant third-party plaintiff in action No. 3, Marques McCall, sued herein as Marcus McCall, a defendant in action No. 1 and a defendant third-party plaintiff in action No. 3, and Matthew McCall, a defendant in action No. 1, and Tower Insurance Company of New York, the plaintiff in action No. 2, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated April 28, 2006, as granted those branches of the motion of the plaintiffs in action No. 1 which were for a joint trial and discovery of action No. 1 with action Nos. 2 and 3.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the motion which was for a joint trial and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion, with leave to renew upon the completion of discovery; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the actions should have been joined for the purpose of conducting discovery, and the plaintiffs should have been granted leave to renew that branch of the motion which was fot a joint trial upon the completion of discovery. Mastro, J.E, Ritter, Skelos, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Peter Di Salvo, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court of Nassau County, rendered April 6, 1962 upon his -plea of guilty, convicting him of robbery in the second degree in each case, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender in each case. Judgments reversed on the law, and matter remitted to the County Court of Nassau County for resentenee of the defendant and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. We *748have not considered any questions of fact. On Hay 10,-1961 defendant,, who was represented by retained counsel, pleaded not guilty to the crimes charged in the two indictments. On October 23,1961 defendant, appearing with counsel, withdrew his prior pleas of not guilty to each indictment and pleaded guilty to robfoerjr in the second degree under the first count of each indictment, in satisfaction of both indictments. On February 16, 1962 defendant’s counsel, with the court’s consent, withdrew from the ease, and defendant was given an opportunity to obtain new counsel. Defendant retained new counsel, and after several adjournments for sentence the matter appeared on the calendar on April 6, 1962. On that, date an office associate of defendant’s counsel requested an adjournment on the ground that for tlie past week counsel had been actually engaged in a trial in Chicago and that he was still so engaged. The application was denied. The court thereupon immediately assigned the office associate of defendant’s counsel to represent the defendant; and the court made such assignment despite such associate’s vigorous protest on the ground that he was completely unfamiliar with the facts in the ease. Defendant was thereupon sentenced as above indicated. In our opinion, the denial of the adjournment so as to enable counsel of the defendant’s choice to be present at the sentence deprived the defendant of a substantial, constitutional right (N. Y. Const., art. I, § 6; *People*v. *Ptarmigan,*7 N Y 2d 317; *People*v. *Price,*262 N. Y. 410; *People*v. *Page,*17 A D 2d 782). 'Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### § 778.21 Proof of publication.

A copy of the newspaper advertisements of the application for a permit, significant revision of a permit, or renewal of a permit, or proof of publication of the advertisements which is acceptable to the regulatory authority shall be filed with the regulatory authority and shall be made a part of the application not later than 4 weeks after the last date of publication as required by § 773.6(a)(1) of this chapter.

[48 FR 44399, Sept. 28, 1983, as amended at 65 FR 79669, Dec. 19, 2000]
1

Fellner, Christian

From: Frey, Nathan J. [Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 12:54 PM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Hutson, Nick; Fellner, Christian

Subject: Re: DOE NETL Contact

Best contacts would be:

  

John Wimer <john.wimer@netl.doe.gov>

304‐285‐4124

  

Eric Grol eric.grol@netl.doe.gov

412‐386‐5463

  

 

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 12:23 PM 

To: Frey, Nathan J. 

Cc: Culligan, Kevin <Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov>; Hutson, Nick <Hutson.Nick@epa.gov>; Fellner, Christian 

<Fellner.Christian@epa.gov> 

Subject: DOE NETL Contact 

 

Nathan –

Can you let us know who the guy from NETL was on yesterday’s call that asked us to have a follow‐up

conversation with them next week regarding our use of the NETL numbers, costs and reports?  We’re happy to

follow‐up with them, but just didn’t catch the name of the person making the request.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D.

Leader, Energy Strategies Group

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code D243‐01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Office:  (919) 541‐1045

Cell:       (919) 306‐2290

Fax:       (919) 541‐5450

Email:   wayland.robertj@epa.gov

*************************************

  DRAFT/Deliberative Document ‐ FOIA Exempt

*************************************
The EPA had a conference call with representative from the National Energy Technology 

Laboratory (NETL) and the Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy on September 5, 

2013. The discussion topic was how the EPA used and characterized the numbers and costs in 

the various NETL reports used in developing the EGU GHG NSPS proposal.
EXHIBIT 99.1

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viskase
Companies, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, I, F. Edward Gustafson,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Viskase Companies, Inc.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:

(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viskase Companies, Inc. for the
quarter ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Viskase Companies, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Viskase Companies, Inc.





                             /s/
                             -----------------------------------------------
                             F. Edward Gustafson
                             Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President


<PAGE>
                                                               EXHIBIT 99.2

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viskase
Companies, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, I, Gordon S. Donovan,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Viskase Companies, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viskase Companies, Inc. for the
quarter ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Viskase Companies, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Viskase Companies, Inc.





                             /s/
                             -----------------------------------------------
                             Gordon S. Donovan
                             Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### BRUTON v. N.C. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO.

No. 530P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 496

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
#### § 257.1 Purpose.

This rule updates DoD policy governing acceptance of service of process served on the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the Military Departments.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

RAPID COMPLETIONS LLC,

Appellant

v.

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LLC, 

WEATHERFORD/LAMB, INC., WEATHERFORD US, 

LP, WEATHERFORD ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEMS,

LLC,

Appellees

______________________

2018-1859, 2018-1860, 2018-1861

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-

01509, IPR2016-01514, IPR2016-01517.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

WASIF QURESHI, Jackson Walker LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by GREGORY J.

GONSALVES, Gonsalves Law Firm, Falls Church, VA. 

 DOUGLAS R. WILSON, Armond Wilson LLP, Austin, TX, 

argued for appellees. Also represented by MICHELLE 
ARMOND, Irvine, CA; LESLIE PAYNE, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL 

FIRST, Heim, Payne & Chorush, LLP, Houston, TX. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 June 6, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
# **Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

      Pursuant toSection 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and InvestorProtection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted),Gene W. Ray, the Chief Executive Officer of The Titan Corporation(the “Company”), and Mark W. Sopp, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best ofhis knowledge:

**1.**      TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached asExhibit 99.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

**2.**      Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition of the Company atthe end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results ofoperations of the Company for the period covered by the PeriodicReport.

Dated:  November 7, 2003

| /s/ GENE W. RAY               |           | /s/ MARK W. SOPP |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                    |                                                        |
| Gene W.Ray Chief Executive Officer | Mark W.Sopp** Chief Financial Officer                  |
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Designate Chief Administrative Law Judge 

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me under section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, I delegate to you, your successor in function, or 

anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or delegated the authority to perform the 

functions and duties of your position, the authority to designate one of the judges in the 

Office of Administrative Law Judges as the Chief Administrative Law Judge pursuant to 

section 451(c) of the General Education Provisions Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1234(c), and 34 

C.F.R. § 81.4(b). 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments by law, rule, or 

regulation to the authority herein are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

There are no reservations.

III. REDELEGATIONS

The authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegation 

Control Officer. 

 ___________/s_______ _____ 

 Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D. 

 

 

OGC Clearance and Date: Debbie Friendly; 6/4/2021______________________ 

Departmental Delegations Control Officer _Jim Clemmens_______________ 
Certification Date: 6/8/2021 

Control #:EA/EKMJ/217
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**QURAN HERRINGTON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 269 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**