alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 705.19 Financing. ( a ) The financial requirements for community relations purposes will be kept to the minimum necessary to accomplish Department of Defense objectives.
( b ) Costs of participation will normally be at government expense for the following types of events and programs when they are in the primary interest of the Department of Defense: ( 1 ) Public observances of national holidays.
( 2 ) Official ceremonies and functions.
( 3 ) Speaking engagements.
( 4 ) Programmed, scheduled tours by Navy information activity support units (e.g., an exhibit from the Navy Exhibit Center) when this method of reaching special audiences is considered by the Secretary of the Navy to be the most effective and economical way of accomplishing a priority public affairs program.
( 5 ) Tours by units (e.g., the Navy Band) for which appropriated funds have been specifically provided.
( 6 ) Support of recruiting.
( 7 ) Events considered to be in the national interest, or in the professional, scientific, or technical interests of the Navy or Department of Defense, when approved by the Secretary of Defense or the overseas Unified Commander, as appropriate.
( c ) Navy participation in all other public events will normally be at no additional costs to the government. ( 1 ) Continuing type costs to the government which would have existed had the Navy not participated in the event will not be reimbursed by the sponsor.
( 2 ) Transportation costs may be excluded from the costs to be borne by the sponsor when the transportation can be accomplished by government aircraft on a normal training flight or opportune airlift.
§ 1804.13 Receipt, recording, and tasking. The Information and Privacy Coordinator shall within ten (10) days record each request for historical access received under this part, acknowledge receipt to the requester in writing and take the following action: ( a ) *Compliance with general requirements.* The Coordinator shall review each request under this part and determine whether it meets the general requirements as set forth in § 1804.11; if it does not, the Coordinator shall so notify the requester and explain the legal basis for this decision.
( b ) *Action on requests meeting general requirements.* For requests which meet the requirements of § 1804.11, the Coordinator shall thereafter task the originator(s) of the materials for which access is sought and other interested parties. Additional taskings, as required during the review process, shall be accomplished within ten (10) days of notification.
#### §§ 757.7-757.10 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 99.1



Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS)

Series 2002-1 Trust

To liquidate its assets and terminate

|CUSIP:  | 80409X205
|------- | ---------
|Symbol: | MJO      

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

March 8, 2007

NEW YORK, NEW YORK  Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS), Aon Capital Security Backed Series 2002-1 Trust (the Trust) (New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol MJO), announced today that a Trust Wind Up Event has occurred under the terms of the Trust Agreement governing the Trust and that the Trust will liquidate its assets and terminate. On February 27, 2007, the Call Options holder for the SATURNS 2002-1 Trust (the Trust) notified the Trust of its intent to exercise its Call Options representing its right to call all of the Underlying Securities owned by the Trust. Upon settlement of the Call Options on or about March 9, 2007, Unitholders will receive the par value plus accrued interest, of each Class A Unit and accrued interest outstanding on each Class B Unit.



Contact:



|LaSalle Bank National Association |  | Andy Streepey, ABS Trust Services, 312-904-9387
|--------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                                  |  |                                                











| |  | 
| |  |
#### STATE v. JOHNSTON

No. 518A97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 563

Attorney General’s motion to dismiss allowed 4 December 1997.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0506 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. ROBERT KERRY SMUIN, Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 22 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 15 2023

12/15/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0506
§ 770.29 Entry procedures. ( a ) Operational, security, and safety considerations take priority over requests by individuals to visit a naval installation. Consistent with such considerations, visits by members of the general public may be authorized at the discretion of the commander. The commitment of resources which would be required to safeguard the persons and property of visitors as well as military property and personnel must of necessity preclude or severely restrict such visiting. The purpose and duration of the visit and the size of the party and areas to be visited are other considerations which may affect the commander's decision whether to permit visiting by members of the public.
( b ) Any person or group desiring to enter a particular naval installation or portion thereof, shall submit a written request to the commander of the installation well enough in advance to allow a reasonable time for reply by mail. Mailing addresses for commanders of major installations covered by this subpart are listed in § 770.31. Full compliance with a naval installation's local visitor registration and entry control procedures shall be deemed the equivalent of obtaining the advance consent of the commander for entrance upon the installation for the purpose of this subpart. Authorization to enter one naval installation or a portion of one installation does not necessarily include the authorization to enter any other naval installation or all portions of an installation.
#### § 855.18 Aviation fuel and oil purchases.

When a user qualifies under the provisions of AFM 67-1, vol. 1, part three, chapter 1, Air Force Stock Fund and DPSC Assigned Item Procedures,[5] purchase of Air Force fuel and oil may be made on a cash or credit basis. An application for credit authority can be filed by submitting an Authorized Credit Letter to SA-ALC/SFRL, 1014 Andrews Road, Building 1621, Kelly AFB TX 78241-5603.

###### Footnotes -
  855.18

[5] See footnote 1 to § 855.6.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T OCTOB ER 14, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 12 43 4 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock et No. 1 :1 0- cv -0 07 59 -CAP UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,
ve rs us THOMAS J. LAWL ER, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ct of Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Oct ob er 1 4, 2 01 0) Befo re CARNES, M ARCUS an d C OX, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM: The di st ric t co ur t gr an te d th e Gov ern m en t’s pe ti ti on to e n f o r c e In te rn al Rev en ue su m

m on se s, an d t he Defen da nt Tho m as J. Lawl er ap pe al s.Lawle r pr es en ts two arg um en ts on th is ap pe al
. He co nt en ds : (1 ) th at th e co ur t

erre d in co nc lu di ng th at he waiv ed hi s rig ht to as se rt de fen se s by hi s fai lu re to ti m el y
as se rt th em in res po ns e to th e Mag is tra te Ju dg e’s sh ow cau se or de r; an d (2 ) th at pr io r
co ur t ap pr ov al was re qu ire d fo r ad m in is tra ti ve is su an ce o f th es e su m m on se s. W e fin d no erro r in th e di st ric t co ur t’s co nc lu si o n t h a t Lawle r’s fai lu re to
su bs ta nt iv el y ob

ject an d res po nd to th e pe ti ti on waiv ed de fen se s. Thi s waiv er fo recl os es Lawle r’s se co nd arg um en t. As a ge ne ral ru le , we wil l no t co ns id er a le ga l is su e or th eo ry rai se d fo r th e fir st ti m e on ap pe al
. Uni te d St at es v. Tr emb le , 93 3 F.2 d 92 5, 92 8 (11 th Ci r 19 91 ). Non e of th e ex cep ti on s to th e ge ne ral ru le are app li cab le he re. AFFIR MED.

2
UNITED STATES
  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER
  PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
  THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of August 2005

(Commission File No. 1-14728)

Lan Airlines S.A.
(Translation of registrant's name in English)

Avenida Americo Vespucio Sur 901
  Renca,
  Santiago, Chile
  (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
  reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.)

Form 20-F X Form
  40-F _____

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing
  the
  information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the
  information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)

Yes ____ No X





---

[Lan Airlines Letterhead]

MATERIAL FACT



Santiago, August 3, 2005



Mr. Alejandro Ferreiro Y.

Superintendent of Securities and Insurance

Present



Re:Material Fact

To whom it may concern:

In compliance with current regulations, and specifically Circular N°660 of the Superintendence of Securities and Insurance, I inform you of the material fact that at an ordinary Board of Director's meeting held August 2nd of the current year, the Board of Lan Airlines S.A. authorized the distribution of an interim dividend of US$0.11430 per share out of profits for the 2005 fiscal year, which will be paid beginning on September 2, 2005 to all registered shareholders on the fifth business day before the aforementioned date.

Sincerely,

/s/ Alejandro de la Fuente Goic

Alejandro de la Fuente Goic

Vice President of Finance

Lan Airlines S.A.







|cc. | Bolsa de Comercio de SantiagoBolsa de Comercio de ValparaísoBolsa Electrónica de Chile
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







---



SIGNATURE

Pursuant
  to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
  duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
  duly authorized.

Date: August 4, 2005

| | Lan Airlines S.A.                                                                                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Alejandro de la Fuente Goic
      By: Alejandro de la Fuente Goic
      Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.27 Reconsideration of a claim. A claimant may request reconsideration of an initial settlement or denial of a claim. The claimant sends the request in writing, to the settlement authority within a reasonable time following the initial settlement or denial. Sixty days is considered a reasonable time, but the settlement authority may waive the time limit for good cause. ( a ) The original settlement authority reviews the reconsideration request. The settlement authority sends the entire claim file with recommendations and supporting rationale to the next higher settlement authority if all relief the claimant requests is not granted.
( b ) The decision of the higher settlement authority is the final administrative action on the claim.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.2
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 /s/ Richard L. Travis, Jr.Richard L. Travis, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
Date: June 28, 2011 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,700-01

EX PARTE TERRILL MIDDLETON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W10-72351-S(A) IN THE 282 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ND

FROM DALLAS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to imprisonment for ten years. 

The Applicant alleges, among other things, that his plea was involuntary and that he received

ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel in this case. The State responds to Applicant’s

allegations, in pertinent part:

The State contends that trial and appellate counsel for Applicant

provided representation that fell within the wide range of reasonable

assistance [cite omitted]. The State, however, recognizes that this
Court may desire additional evidence regarding trial and appellate

counsel’s representation of Applicant. If so, the State requests that

this Court gather evidence, as is customary, by way of affidavit from

both counsel or hold an evidentiary hearing should the Court deem

such to be necessary.

On July 7, 2014, a timely order designating issues was signed by the trial court. The habeas

record was then properly forwarded to this Court pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P.73.4 (b)(5), but without

the designated issues being resolved by the trial court. We remand this application to the 282 1 nd

Judicial District Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary

investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: March 04, 2015

Do not publish 

 Under TEX. R. APP. P. 73.5, a trial court may request an extension of time to resolve 1

designated issues by filing a motion before the expiration of 180 days from the date of the receipt

of the application by the State.
#### INGERSOLL *vs.*ROBINSON.

[action on promissory note, by payee against maker.]

1. *Sd-off of partnership against individual debt.*— In an action on a promissory note, by tbe payee against the maker, a plea averring that tbe plaintiff is a member of a partnership which is indebted to defendant, but not stating that the debt is due by “judgment, bond, covenant, or promise in writing,** (Code, §§ 2142-43,) is defective as a plea of set-off.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Russell.

Tried before the lion. John Gill Shorter.

This action was brought by Alexander J. Robinson, against Stephen M. Ingersoll, and was founded on the defendant’s promissory note for $1061 61, dated the 16th May, 1857, and payable on the 1st January next after date. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and a special plea in the following words : “ The defendant, as a *defendant*to the action of the plaintiff, says, that at the time the said summons was sued out, the said plaintiff was a silent partner of one Horace King, a free negro; that said firm, composed of said plaintiff and said King, was indebted to defendant in the sum of $1500, by *amount*due, and which he hereby offers to set off’ against the plaintiff’s demand ; and he claims judgment for the residue.” The court sustained a demurrer to this plea, and its ruling is here assigned as error.

Barnett & Philips, for appellant.

Goldtiiwaite, Rice & Semple, *contra.*

*293STONE, J.

The plea of set-off in this ease fails to aver that the demand sought to be set off, was a “judgment, bond, covenant, or promise in writing.” It is described as a partnership debt, and hence is not within the statute which declares partnership debts to be several as well as joint. — Code, § 2143.

The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the second plea. — Duramus v. Harrison, 26 Ala. 326.

Judgment affirmed.
### §2323. Organization

The organization of the Plant Variety Protection Office shall, except as provided herein, be determined by the Secretary of Agriculture (hereinafter called the Secretary). The office shall devote itself substantially exclusively to the administration of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title I, §3, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1542.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1711-2 Sealing of slope or drift openings.

Slope or drift openings required to be sealed under § 75.1711 shall be sealed with solid, substantial, incombustible material, such as concrete blocks, bricks or tile, or shall be completely filled with incombustible material for a distance of at least 25 feet into such openings.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of the Chief Information Officer

The Chief Information Officer

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Director, Financial Systems Services

FROM: The Chief Information Officer

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Approve Travel Activities 

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me from the Secretary, by EA/EI/14, certified on 

October 30, 2008, I hereby delegate to you, to your successor in function, and to 

anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority to establish 

Departmental travel policy in accordance with 41 CFR Chapters 301-304, 

commonly known as the General Services Administration's Federal Travel 

Regulations. This authority includes, but is not limited to the:

A. Approval of the issuance of Departmental manuals relating to travel. This 

authority may not be redelegated;

B. Approval of actual subsistence expenses over the total allowable per diem 

rate for each trip;

C. Approval of premium class travel accommodations; and 

D. Approval of cash travel advances.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authority cited herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

A. Authority to approve reimbursement of actual subsistence expenses, 

premium class travel accommodations, and cash travel advances for the 

Director, Financial Systems Services, is reserved to the Deputy Chief 

Information Officer.

B. Authority to certify one's own travel and voucher expenses is reserved to 

Principal Officers and heads of special offices only.

C. Authority to approve international travel is reserved to the Secretary or his or 

her delegatee.
Page 2 – Delegation of Travel Authority

III. REDELEGATION

The authority to approve the issuance of Departmental manuals, as described in 

section I.A. above, may not be redelegated.

You may delegate any of the other authorities delegated to you. No further 

redelegation is authorized.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

The delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegation Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

authority. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the 

Director, Financial Systems Services prior to the date of certification.

_______/s/_____________

 Danny A. Harris, Ph.D.

Certified Date: 1/8/2009

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number; EI/EIF/15
#### STATE v. VALIQUETTE

No. 587P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 752

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1998.
Jonathan B. Hill

+1 202 776 2725

jhill@cooley.com

VIA EMAIL TRANSMISSION

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

April 15, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: FAA Docket 2015-0430-0001 (Helicopters West, Inc.)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Enclosed for inclusion in the referenced docket is a confidential filing made on behalf of 

Helicopters West, Inc. of its motion picture and television operations manual. It is requested 

that this manual not be included in the public record and it be maintained as confidential as it is 

not distributed to the public by Helicopters West, Inc. It contains proprietary and confidential 

business information. 

Should you have any questions concerning this, please contact the undersigned.

Sincerely yours,

Jonathan B. Hill

Counsel for Helicopters West, Inc.

Encl.

cc: James Williams

Robert Pappas

Thuy Cooper 

Dean Griffith, Esq. 

Jake Troutman
### Part F—Examinations; Response Time; Initial Appeals
EXHIBIT 32 (a)

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of Enzo  Biochem,  Inc.,  and
Subsidiaries  ("the  Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended July 31,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Elazar  Rabbani,  Ph.D.,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated: March 30, 2007                            By: /s/ Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                                     --------------------------
                                                         Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                                         Chief Executive Officer



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.