Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 94 / Friday, May 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 27859 

enforcement agencies in enforcing this 

regulation. 

This document is issued under 

authority of 33 CFR 100.1102 and 5 

U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this 

document in the Federal Register, the 

Coast Guard will provide the maritime 

community with extensive advance 

notification of this enforcement period 

via the Local Notice to Mariners and 

local advertising by the event sponsor. 

If the Captain of the Port Sector San 

Diego or his designated representative 

determines that the regulated area need 

not be enforced for the full duration 

stated on this document, he or she may 

use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners or 

other communications coordinated with 

the event sponsor to grant general 

permission to enter the regulated area. 

Dated: May 4, 2015. 

J.S. Spaner, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Diego. 

[FR Doc. 2015–11808 Filed 5–14–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1986–0005; FRL–9927– 

72–Region 5] 

National Oil and Hazardous Substance 

Pollution Contingency Plan; National 

Priorities List: Deletion of the Burrows 

Sanitation Superfund Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) Region 5 is 

publishing a direct final Notice of 

Deletion of the Burrows Sanitation 

Superfund Site (Site), located in 

Hartford Township, Van Buren County, 

Michigan from the National Priorities 

List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated 

pursuant to Section 105 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is 

an appendix to the National Oil and 

Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct 

final deletion is being published by EPA 

with the concurrence of the State of 

Michigan, through the Michigan 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(MDEQ), because EPA has determined 

that all appropriate response actions 

under CERCLA have been completed. 

However, this deletion does not 

preclude future actions under 

Superfund. 

DATES: This direct final deletion is 

effective July 14, 2015 unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by June 15, 

2015. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final deletion in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

deletion will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ– 

SFUND–1986–0005, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: Jeffrey Gore, Remedial 

Project Manager, at gore.jeffrey@epa.gov 

or Cheryl Allen, Community 

Involvement Coordinator, at 

allen.cherly@epa.gov. 

• Fax: Gladys Beard, NPL Deletion 

Process Manager at (312) 697–2077. 

• Mail: Jeffrey Gore, Remedial Project 

Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (SR–6J), 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 

886–6552, or Cheryl Allen, Community 

Involvement Coordinator, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (SI– 

7J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 353–6196 or 

(800) 621–8431. 

• Hand delivery: Cheryl Allen, 

Community Involvement Coordinator, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(SI–7J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, IL 60604. Such deliveries are 

only accepted during the docket’s 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

normal business hours are Monday 

through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 

CST, excluding federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1986– 

0005. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http://

www.regulations.gov or email. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through http://

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http://

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information 

may not be publicly available, e.g., CBI 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in the 

hard copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at: 

• U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency—Region 5, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, Phone: 

(312) 353–1063, Hours: Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. CST, 

excluding federal holidays. 

• Hartford Public Library, 15 Franklin 

Street, Hartford, MI 49057, Phone: (269) 

621–3408, Hours: Monday through 

Wednesday, 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., 

Thursday and Friday 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 

p.m., Saturday 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey Gore, Remedial Project Manager, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(SR–6J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 886–6552, or 

gore.jeffrey@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. NPL Deletion Criteria 

III. Deletion Procedures 

IV. Basis for Site Deletion 

V. Deletion Action 

I. Introduction 

EPA Region 5 is publishing this direct 

final Notice of Deletion of the Burrows 

Sanitation Superfund Site (Site) from 

the National Priorities List (NPL) and 

requests public comment on this action. 

The NPL constitutes appendix B of 40 

CFR part 300, which is the National Oil 

and Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA 

promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

27860 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 94 / Friday, May 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. 

EPA maintains the NPL as the list of 

sites that appear to present a significant 

risk to public health, welfare, or the 

environment. Sites on the NPL may be 

the subject of remedial actions financed 

by the Hazardous Substance Superfund 

(Fund). This deletion of the Burrows 

Sanitation Site is issued in accordance 

with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and is 

consistent with the Notice of Policy 

Change: Deletion of Site Listed on the 

National Priorities List, (49 FR 37070) 

on September 21, 1989. As described in 

300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, sites deleted 

from the NPL remain eligible for Fundfinanced remedial actions if future 

conditions warrant such actions. 

Because EPA considers this action to 

be noncontroversial and routine, this 

action will be effective July 14, 2015 

unless EPA receives adverse comments 

by June 15, 2015. Along with this direct 

final Notice of Deletion, EPA is copublishing a Notice of Intent to Delete 

in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of the 

Federal Register. If adverse comments 

are received within the 30-day public 

comment period on this deletion action, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

this direct final Notice of Deletion 

before the effective date of the deletion, 

and the deletion will not take effect. 

EPA will, as appropriate, prepare a 

response to comments and continue 

with the deletion process on the basis of 

the Notice of Intent to Delete and the 

comments already received. There will 

be no additional opportunity to 

comment. 

Section II of this document explains 

the criteria for deleting sites from the 

NPL. Section III discusses procedures 

that EPA is using for this action. Section 

IV discusses the Burrows Sanitation Site 

and demonstrates how it meets the 

deletion criteria. Section V discusses 

EPA’s action to delete the site from the 

NPL unless adverse comments are 

received during the public comment 

period. 

II. NPL Deletion Criteria 

The NCP establishes the criteria that 

EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. 

In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), 

sites may be deleted from the NPL 

where no further response is 

appropriate. In making such a 

determination pursuant to 40 CFR 

300.425(e), EPA will consider, in 

consultation with the State, whether any 

of the following criteria have been met: 

i. Responsible parties or other persons 

have implemented all appropriate 

response actions required; 

ii. All appropriate Fund-financed 

response under CERCLA has been 

implemented, and no further response 

action by responsible parties is 

appropriate; or 

iii. The remedial investigation has 

shown that the release poses no 

significant threat to public health or the 

environment and, therefore, the taking 

of remedial measures is not appropriate. 

Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c) 

and the NCP, EPA conducts five-year 

reviews to ensure the continued 

protectiveness of remedial actions 

where hazardous substances, pollutants, 

or contaminants remain at a site above 

levels that allow for unlimited use and 

unrestricted exposure. EPA conducts 

such five-year reviews at these sites 

even if the site is deleted from the NPL. 

EPA may initiate further action to 

ensure continued protectiveness at a 

deleted site if new information becomes 

available that indicates it is appropriate. 

Whenever there is a significant release 

from a site deleted from the NPL, the 

deleted site may be restored to the NPL 

without application of the hazard 

ranking system. 

III. Deletion Procedures 

The following procedures apply to 

deletion of the Burrows Sanitation Site: 

(1) EPA consulted with the State of 

Michigan prior to developing this direct 

final Notice of Deletion and the Notice 

of Intent to Delete co-published today in 

the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of the 

Federal Register. 

(2) EPA has provided the State thirty 

(30) working days for review of this 

notice and the parallel Notice of Intent 

to Delete prior to their publication 

today, and the State, through the MDEQ, 

has concurred on the deletion of the Site 

from the NPL. 

(3) Concurrently with the publication 

of this direct final Notice of Deletion, a 

notice of the availability of the parallel 

Notice of Intent to Delete is being 

published in a major local newspaper, 

the ‘‘Tri-City Record Newspaper’’. The 

newspaper notice announces the 30-day 

public comment period concerning the 

Notice of Intent to Delete the Site from 

the NPL. 

(4) EPA placed copies of documents 

supporting the proposed deletion in the 

deletion docket and made these items 

available for public inspection and 

copying at the Site information 

repositories identified above. 

(5) If adverse comments are received 

within the 30-day public comment 

period on this deletion action, EPA will 

publish a timely notice of withdrawal of 

this direct final Notice of Deletion 

before its effective date and will prepare 

a response to comments and continue 

with the deletion process on the basis of 

the Notice of Intent to Delete and the 

comments already received. 

Deletion of a site from the NPL does 

not itself create, alter, or revoke any 

individual’s rights or obligations. 

Deletion of a site from the NPL does not 

in any way alter EPA’s right to take 

enforcement actions, as appropriate. 

The NPL is designed primarily for 

informational purposes and to assist 

EPA management. Section 300.425(e)(3) 

of the NCP states that the deletion of a 

site from the NPL does not preclude 

eligibility for future response actions, 

should future conditions warrant such 

actions. 

IV. Basis for Site Deletion 

The following information provides 

EPA’s rationale for deleting the Burrows 

Sanitation Superfund Site from the NPL. 

Site Background and History 

The Burrows Sanitation Site 

(CERCLIS ID: MID98410617) is 

approximately 10 acres. The Site is 

located on 54th Avenue in Hartford 

Township, Van Buren County, 

Michigan. The property is located in a 

rural part of Hartford on a portion of 

property owned by a resident of 

Hartford Township. Much of the Site is 

covered with trees, and there are 

intermittent open areas to the east and 

northwest of the Site. The property 

owner lives west of the Site and another 

homeowner lives south of the Site 

across 54th Avenue. There are 

approximately 150 people living in 

residences further west along 54th 

Avenue in a trailer park and a small 

number of other homes. The residences 

have historically obtained water from 

private wells that vary in depth up to 

100 feet. 

The Site property became 

contaminated when it was owned by 

Duane and Evelyn Funk, who agreed to 

allow Burrows Sanitation, a small septic 

hauler, to dispose of waste on a remote 

portion of their property. Burrows 

Sanitation disposed of wastes on the 

Site which it had collected from Du-Wel 

Products Inc., Auto Specialties 

Manufacturing Company (AUSCO), and 

Whirlpool Corporation. The wastes were 

primarily by-products of metal finishing 

and plating operations, which consisted 

of hydroxide sludges containing 

chromium, other metals, as well as some 

cyanide. The metal hydroxide wastes 

were deposited in unlined pits when the 

disposal was taking place between 1970 

and 1977. 

Remedial Investigation and Feasibility 

Study 

In 1976, the Michigan Department of 

Natural Resources (MDNR) took samples 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 94 / Friday, May 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 27861 

from the Site and found elevated levels 

of copper, chromium and cyanide. In 

1984, MDNR conducted further 

investigations which led it to conclude 

that the Site posed a human health 

threat. In July 1984, the Funks, Du-Wel, 

AUSCO and Whirlpool signed an 

Administrative Order of Consent (AOC). 

Pursuant to the AOC, this group of 

potentially responsible parties (PRPs) 

proceeded to excavate and remove 

sludges and contaminated soil from 

previously identified areas of the Site 

for off-site disposal. 

EPA began remedial planning as the 

Burrows Sanitation Site was proposed 

for the NPL on September 8, 1983, (48 

FR 40674). The Site was listed on the 

NPL on September 21, 1989, (49 FR 

37070). 

Record of Decision Findings 

The objectives of the 1986 Record of 

Decision (ROD) for the Site included the 

following: 

The remedial action objectives for the 

selected remedy at the Burrows 

Sanitation Site are to protect human 

health by preventing dermal exposure 

and ingestion of contaminated sludge 

and soil from the site, prevent ingestion 

of contaminated groundwater exceeding 

drinking water criteria, and prevent 

exposure of aquatic life from 

contaminated surface waters. The 

remedy will achieve Safe Drinking 

Water Act Primary and Secondary 

Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) 

by groundwater treatment and by 

surface and subsurface soil excavation 

and off-site disposal. 

The components of the 1986 ROD for 

the Site included the following: 

• Purge and treat the contaminated 

groundwater for approximately 3 years; 

• Drain the artificial Northwest 

Wetland; and 

• Remove and treat approximately 

250 cubic yards of metal hydroxide 

sludge from the Spill Area No. 2 and the 

Northwest Wetland. Dispose of the 

treated waste at an off-site RCRA facility 

which is in compliance with EPA 

policy. 

The 1991 Explanation of Significant 

Differences (ESD) for the Site included 

the following differences to the 1986 

ROD: 

• A scaled down groundwater 

extraction system based on additional 

groundwater monitoring since the 1986 

ROD. 

• Off-site treatment of contaminated 

groundwater instead of on-site 

treatment. 

The 1991 ESD also documented that 

the soil removal and off-site disposal 

actions outlined in the 1986 ROD had 

been completed. 

The 1994 ESD for the Site 

documented the change in the EPA MCL 

for chromium which was raised from 50 

ppb to 100 ppb (effective July 30, 1992). 

Response Actions 

The first phase of the Remedial 

Action (RA) was completed in May, 

1989. During this first phase of the RA, 

320 cubic yards of contaminated surface 

soils and sediments from the spill area 

identified in the RI/FS were excavated 

and transported off-site to a RCRA 

facility. The soil removal was based on 

soil sampling investigation results 

completed and reported in 1986, which 

outlined the area of contaminated soil 

and how deeper soils for the location at 

the water table produced chemical 

concentrations comparable to 

background. The blockage in the 

artificial Northwest Wetland was 

removed and re-channeled. As a result, 

only the groundwater remained to be 

treated. 

The additional groundwater 

investigations undertaken in 1989 

involved the installation of five new 

PVC monitoring well nests on the Site. 

Three rounds of additional groundwater 

sampling were completed at the 

Burrows Site in 1990, one each in 

March, June, and September of that 

year. Groundwater samples were 

analyzed for the chemicals of concern, 

which included dissolved zinc, 

dissolved chromium, dissolved copper, 

dissolved lead, and dissolved nickel. 

Analytical results for the three rounds of 

groundwater sampling determined that 

all chemicals of concern were below the 

groundwater cleanup standards except 

for an exceedance of dissolved 

chromium. 

The groundwater extraction system 

including an extraction well, storage 

tank, and associated equipment for 

extracting groundwater and removing it 

for off-site treatment was constructed at 

the Site between July and September 

1991. Groundwater extraction began at 

the Burrows Site in August of 1992 and 

continued until December 1993. During 

that period a total of 2,600,000 gallons 

of groundwater were extracted and 

taken for off-site treatment and disposal 

to the Kalamazoo, Michigan Water 

Reclamation Plant. 

Remedial Action construction 

activities officially concluded in April 

of 1993 with the completion and signing 

of the Preliminary Close-Out Report for 

the Burrows Site. 

Institutional Controls 

Institutional Controls (‘‘ICs’’) are nonengineered instruments, such as 

administrative and legal controls, that 

help to minimize the potential for 

exposure to contamination and that 

protect the integrity of the remedy. ICs 

are required to assure the long-term 

protectiveness for any areas which do 

not allow for unlimited use and 

unrestricted exposure (UU/UE). As 

explained further, none of EPA’s 

decision documents (ROD, ESD, CD or 

Amended CD) for this Site required ICs 

in order to assure Site protectiveness 

since UU/UE would be allowed for all 

Site areas. The remedy is considered by 

EPA to be protective of human health 

and the environment without the need 

for ICs. 

EPA sent out a letter in October 1999 

notifying the Burrows Settling 

Defendants of Completion of Remedial 

Action under the requirements of the 

1992 Amended CD. Site access and use 

of the land by property owners is now 

unrestricted, based on completion of the 

remedial action requirements under the 

1992 Amended CD. Both the 1990 CD 

and the 1992 Amended CD provided 

that after EPA certification of 

completion of the remedial action, 

additional response actions could be 

required if conditions previously 

unknown to the United States are 

discovered or information is received 

which indicate that the remedial action 

is not protective of human health and 

the environment. EPA believes the 

remedial action completed at this Site is 

protective of human health and the 

environment, and it does not plan to 

require additional remedial action. 

Cleanup Goals 

The post-ROD groundwater 

monitoring conducted to date by EPA 

shows that the groundwater has met the 

drinking water standards outlined in the 

decision documents and the Amended 

CD. Therefore, the remedial action 

conducted at the Site has achieved UU/ 

UE for all site areas. Since the Site 

remedy has achieved UU/UE, no ICs are 

required at the Site to assure long-term 

protectiveness. 

MDEQ has conducted independent 

residential well sampling in the area 

surrounding the Burrows Site through 

various County Health Departments 

from 2002 to 2014. EPA concurred with 

the MDEQ residential well sampling 

program. MDEQ contacted the Van 

Buren-Cass County District Health 

Department to arrange for sampling of 

local residential wells beginning in 

2002. Van Buren-Cass County District 

Health Department implemented an 

annual sampling program for volatile 

organic compounds (VOCs) at local 

residential wells. The 2007 sampling 

results at the five locations were 

consistent with previous results, which 

demonstrated that the presence of 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

27862 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 94 / Friday, May 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

volatile organic compounds was not 

detected at the residential wells 

sampled. MDEQ stated they planned to 

include metals in the residential well 

sampling program beginning in 2008. 

Since the 2008 five year review, 

MDEQ coordinated with Berrien County 

to collect samples at local residential 

wells. The 2012 and 2013 results 

continued to show no detections of 

volatile organic compounds. Some of 

the locations were also sampled for 

metals analysis. None of the metals were 

detected at concentrations above MCLs 

although residences exceeded the 

aesthetic drinking water value of 0.3 

mg/l for iron in a range of 0.72–1.42 mg/ 

l. Since no site-related impacts have 

been seen in the area residential well 

monitoring conducted over the last 

several years, MDEQ now believes that 

it is appropriate to delete the site from 

the NPL. 

While MDEQ had historical concerns 

regarding the adequacy of groundwater 

plume characterization, MDEQ now 

agrees that the implemented remedial 

actions have been sufficient to address 

the known risks at the Site. 

EPA has determined that the Site is 

subject to zoning by the local 

government and the Site is currently 

zoned for agricultural use. However, 

limiting the Site to agricultural land use 

is not a condition of the Superfund 

remedy. 

Operation and Maintenance 

The implemented remedial actions 

have been sufficient to address the 

known risks at the Site. In addition, nosite related impacts have been seen in 

the residential wells that have been 

monitored by the MDEQ over the past 

several years. Effective immediately, the 

MDEQ will terminate monitoring of the 

residential wells in the vicinity of the 

Burrows Sanitation Superfund Site. 

Five-Year Review 

A Five Year Review Report for the 

Site was completed in February 2013. In 

the report, EPA viewed the Burrows 

Sanitation Site as eligible for deletion 

from the NPL. There were no 

recommendations and follow-up actions 

noted in the 2013 Five Year Review 

Report. Since all clean up goals have 

been achieved and the site is now 

unlimited use/unrestricted exposure no 

additional Five Year Reviews are 

necessary. 

Community Involvement 

Public participation activities have 

been satisfied as required in CERCLA 

Section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and 

CERCLA section 117, 42 U.S.C. 9617. 

Documents in the deletion docket which 

EPA relied on for recommendation of 

the deletion of this site from the NPL are 

available to the public in the 

information repositories and at http://

www.regulations.gov. 

Determination That the Site Meets the 

Criteria for Deletion in the NCP 

The implemented remedy achieves 

the degree of cleanup specified in the 

ROD for all pathways of exposure. All 

selected remedial action objectives and 

clean-up goals are consistent with 

agency policy and guidance. No further 

Superfund response is needed to protect 

human health and the environment at 

the Site. 

The NCP (40 CFR 300.425(e)) states 

that a site may be deleted from the NPL 

when no further response action is 

appropriate. EPA, in consultation with 

the State of Michigan, has determined 

that all required response actions have 

been implemented and no further 

response action by the responsible 

parties is appropriate. 

V. Deletion Action 

EPA, with concurrence from the State 

of Michigan through the Michigan 

Department of Environmental Quality, 

has determined that all appropriate 

response actions under CERCLA have 

been completed. Therefore, EPA is 

deleting the Site from the NPL. 

Because EPA considers this action to 

be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is 

taking it without prior publication. This 

action will be effective July 14, 2015 

unless EPA receives adverse comments 

by June 15, 2015. If adverse comments 

are received within the 30-day public 

comment period, EPA will publish a 

timely withdrawal of this direct final 

Notice of Deletion before the effective 

date of the deletion, and it will not take 

effect. EPA will prepare a response to 

comments and continue with the 

deletion process on the basis of the 

Notice of Intent to Delete and the 

comments already received. There will 

be no additional opportunity to 

comment. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous 

substances, Hazardous waste, 

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Superfund, Water 

pollution control, and Water supply. 

Dated: April 30, 2015. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

For the reasons set out in this 

document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended 

as follows: 

PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND 

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES 

POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 300 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C. 

9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3CFR, 

2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 

3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 

FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193. 

Appendix B to Part 300—[Amended] 

■ 2. Table 1 of appendix B to part 300 

is amended by removing the entry ‘‘MI 

Burrows Sanitation, Hartford.’’ 

[FR Doc. 2015–11801 Filed 5–14–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

42 CFR Part 37 

Specifications for Medical 

Examinations of Coal Miners 

CFR Correction 

In Title 42 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Parts 1 to 399, revised as of 

October 1, 2014, on page 195, in 

§ 37.204, remove the second 

introductory paragraph. 

[FR Doc. 2015–11722 Filed 5–14–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 74 

[DA 15–486] 

Suspension of September 1, 2015 

Digital Transition Date for Low Power 

Television and TV Translator Stations 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; suspension of 

regulations. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Media 

Bureau of the Federal Communications 

Commission (Commission) announced 

that, effective May 15, 2015, the 

September 1, 2015 digital transition date 

for low power television (LPTV) and TV 

translator stations is hereby suspended. 

The Commission will decide on a new 

transition date in the rulemaking 

proceeding in MB Docket No. 03–185. 

Until a decision is reached in the 

rulemaking and the Commission can 

determine the effect of the future 

incentive auction and repacking, LPTV 

and TV translator stations may delay 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES