alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 12-14-00268-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

CARL WADE CURRY, 

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Relator, Carl Wade Curry, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting an order 

directing the trial court to dismiss two misdemeanor complaints filed on March 25, 2010, and 

June 14, 2010, respectively. He alleges that he has filed a motion to dismiss the complaints, but 

the county attorney opposes the motion.1

To be entitled to mandamus relief in a criminal case, a relator must establish that he has 

no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and what he seeks to compel is a 

ministerial act, not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth 

Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) 

(orig. proceeding). A defendant seeking to compel the dismissal of a misdemeanor has an 

adequate remedy at law because he can file a pretrial application for habeas relief in a 

misdemeanor prosecution. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.09 (West 2005). Therefore, 

Relator cannot satisfy the first prerequisite to mandamus. Accordingly, we deny Relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus.

Opinion delivered November 5, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

 

1 Relator did not file an appendix or a record with his petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k); 52.7(a). 

Consequently, we do not have a copy of any documents pertaining to this proceeding.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 5, 2014

NO. 12-14-00268-CR

CARL WADE CURRY,

Relator

V.

HON. RICHARD SANDERS,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed 

by CARL WADE CURRY, who is the relator in Cause No. 2010-0425CC, pending on the docket of 

the County Court of Henderson County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been 

filed herein on September 11, 2014, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the 

opinion of this Court that a writ of mandamus should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, 

ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, 

hereby DENIED.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




Consent
      of Independent


Registered
      Public Accounting Firm




Provectus
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


Knoxville,
      Tennessee




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos.333-99639, 333-86896, 333-73994 and 333-109354) and on Form S-2
      (Nos.333-124951 and 333-119619) of Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report
      dated March 19, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which
      appears in this Form 10-KSB.






/s/
      BDO Seidman,
      LLP






Chicago,
      Illinois


March
      19,
      2007
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 2

r -

cc: Ninth Judicial District Court Dept. 1 Jessica Branco Curtiss Elliot Douglas County Court Clerk
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 00030001
- 00040002
- 00050000
- 00060000
- 00070000
- 00080000
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110003
- 00120004
- 00130000
- 00140000
- 00150000
- 00160000
- 00170000
- 00180000
- 00190000
- 00200000
- 00210000
- 00220000
- 00230005
- 00240000
- 002500bi
- 002600bc
# 33wr 

# m-tf 3S3-/JT 33WJ* 335W 337*/JTELECTRONICRECORD 33&-/£ 33^-/C"

COA# 10-15-00055-CR 

## Miscellaneous/OtherCriminal including Misdemeanoror OFFENSE: Felony William Arthur Mcintosh v. The Stat 

### STYLE: Texas TRIAL COURT: 40th District Court TRIAL COURTS: 20084CR e of 

### COUNTY: Ellis
FOR REHEARING IS: MOTION 

### TRIAL COURTJUDGE: Hon. Bob Carroll DATE: DISPOSITION: DISMISSED JUDGE: 

### DATE: March 5, 2015 

## JUSTICE: Scoggins , PC S YES PUBLISH: DNP: YES SUPPCLKRECORD: CLK RECORD: RPTRECORD: SUPPRPTRECORD: STATE BR: SUPP BR: APPBR: PROSE BR:



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# rkO ££ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# : *^ulv, Zl 2.Q/< DATE 

## JUDGE: '•F'O
CCAIS:. JUDGE: MOTION FOR REHEARING IN ON 

### CCA# 

# S$l*/STHMO 34Q~lg Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP: MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS: ON JUDGE:
### **CHAPTER 5—IMPORTATION OF ADULTERATED SEEDS**
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Essential Air Service at 

Bradford, Pennsylvania 

Franklin/Oil City, Pennsylvania 

DuBois, Pennsylvania 

Jamestown, New York 

Under 49 U.S.C. §41731 et seq. 

DOT-OST-2003-14528 

DOT-OST-1997-2523 

DOT-OST-2004-17617 

DOT-OST-2003-14950 

REOUEST FOR SUBMISSION DEADLINE EXTENTION 

BY GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES 

Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to: 

Mickey Bowman 

Vice President of Corporate Development 

Gulfstream International Airlines 

3201 Griffin Road, 4'^ Floor 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312 

Telephone: 270-689-2180 

Fax: 270-689-2180 

Gulfstream International Airlines ("Gulfstream") respectfully requests an eight day 

extension of the submission deadline date of June 22, 2010 as set by the Department of 

Transportation in its' solicitation of carrier proposals in the above mentioned cities. The 

resulting deadline date would be June 30, 2010. The requested extension would sync this 

date with the pending submission deadline date for the communities of Massena, 

Watertown and Ogdensburg, NY. Gulfstream is currently working on several service 

options that would essentially interweave the two solicitations. We believe the resulting 

service patterns will produce schedules that several communities have requested. 

Gulfstream is seeking addition route approvals with its code share partners that would 

make these options more desirable to the communities involved.. 

We have polled the airport managers for the four communities and they have expressed 

their support in this extension. 

Submitted: June 16, 2010 
Mickey Bowman 

Vice President of Corporate Development 

Gulfstream International Airlines
Exhibit 10.11

                      SALES CONTRACT OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
                      -------------------------------------
                                                                      NO.: 03007
                                                               SIGNED AT: Tai'an
                                                          DATE: January 10, 2003

This contract is made and entered into by and between  Shandong Shengda Chemical
Machinery Co., Ltd (hereinafter  referred to as the Seller) and Shandong Shengda
Chemical  Co., Ltd  (hereinafter  referred to as the Buyer);  whereby the Seller
agree  to sell  and the  Buyer  agree  to buy the  commodity  mentioned  in this
contract subject to the terms and conditions stipulated below:

Article 1: Object, Quantity, Price and Date of Delivery

NAME OF COMMODITY: Methanol Reclaiming Tank

UNIT: PIECE

QUANTITY: Two

UNIT PRICE: RMB 305,238.64 yuan

TOTAL AMOUNT:  RMB  610,477.28  (six hundred and ten thousand,  four hundred and
seventy-seven point two eight) yuan

DATE OF DELIVERY: February 10, 2003

Article 2: QUALITY STANDARD

The seller will manufacture the objects according to the National  Standards and
the drawing sheet provided by the Buyer.

Article 3: TERMS AND TIME LIMIT OF QUALITY  ASSURANCE  OF THE SELLER:  1 Year of
Quality Warranty

Article 4: TITLE TO THE GOODS SHALL BE PASSED  UPON  DELIVERY;  HOWEVER,  IF THE
BUYER  FAILS TO PERFORM  THE  OBLIGATION  OF PAYING THE FULL  AMOUNT OF PURCHASE
PRICE, TITLE TO THE GOODS SHALL REMAIN WITH THE SELLER.

Article 5: MEANS AND PLACE OF DELIVERY: The site where the buyer uses the goods.


<PAGE>

Article  6:  STANDARD,  METHOD,  and PLACE  AND TIME  LIMIT OF  INSPECTION:  The
inspection  will be done  pursuant  to Article 2 at the place of  delivery.  Any
dispute shall be raised within three days.

Article  7:  METHOD,  TIME AND PLACE OF  PAYMENT:  70% shall be paid  after this
contract becomes  effective.  20% shall be paid after the successful  inspection
and acceptance;  and the remaining  amount of money shall be paid off within one
year.

Article 8: TERMINATION OF THIS CONTRACT: After the remaining amount of money has
been paid off.

Article 9: BREACH LIABILITY: shall be governed by the provisions of the Contract
Law.

Article 10: METHOD OF SETTLING THE DISPUTE OVER THE CONTRACT:

IN THE PERFORMING OF THIS CONTRACT, IF ANY DISPUTE ARISES, THE TWO PARTIES SHALL
SETTLE IT THROUGH FRIENDLY DISCUSSIONS;  THE DISPUTE CAN ALSO BE MEDIATED BY THE
LOCAL INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERICAL ADMINISTRATION;  IF NO SETTLEMENT COMES FROM THE
DISCUSSIONS OR  MEDIATATIONS,  THE DISPUTE SHALL BE SETTLED BY LAWSUITS  THROUGH
THE PEOPLE'S COURT.

Article 11: THIS CONTRACT SHALL BECOME  EFFECTIVE  after having been  officially
signed by the two parities.

THE SELLER:                                   THE BUYER:
Shandong Shengda Chemical
Machinery Co., Ltd                            Shandong Shengda Chemical Co., Ltd

 /s/ Gong Xingyu                                /s/ Wang Wei
-------------------------                     ----------------------------------
AUTHORISED SIGNATURE                          AUTHORISED SIGNATURE
EXHIBIT 4.18

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 4
                                       TO
                                    DEBENTURE

ISSUANCE DATE                          November 20,2003
CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE DUE              June 30, 2005 (as amended)
AMOUNT                                 Up to $ 2,500,000.00 (as amended)

        This Amendment No. 4 to Debenture, dated March 2, 2005, is made by and
between AccuPoll Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation ("AHI"), Dennis Vadura
("Vadura"), AccuPoll, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("API," and, together with
Vadura and AHI, the "Company"), and Hyde Investments, Ltd. (the "Holder").

Extension of Maturity Date:

The Maturity Date of the Debenture is hereby extended to June 30, 2005.

Extension Fee:

The Company hereby acknowledges and agrees that the current principal and
interest balance of the note, as of March 1, 2005, is $1,223,261.16. The Company
hereby agrees to pay the sum of $122,326 in consideration of the extension set
forth above. Such amount will be added to the balance of the Debenture as of the
date hereof.

Consent and Acknowledgement:

The Company, and each of them, hereby consent to, and acknowledge full force and
effectiveness of this Amendment No. 4 to the Debenture. The Parties
acknowledge that the holder hereof verbally agreed to waive any default as a
result of the lapse of the maturity date hereof on December 31, 2004, and to
negotiate an appropriate extension.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has duly executed this Amendment No. 4
to Debenture as of March 1, 2005.

ACCUPOLL HOLDING CORP.                 Hyde Investments, Ltd.
ACCUPOLL, INC.

By   /s/ Dennis Vadura                 By:
   ------------------------------         ------------------------------------
Dennis Vadura                          Name:
Chairman and CEO                            Title:


Acknowledgement and Consent:
DENNIS VADURA

/s/ DENNIS VADURA
---------------------------------
Dennis Vadura, an individual


                                       1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5


<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           54,014
<SECURITIES>                                1,102,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    891,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      178,749
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,464,527
<PP&E>                                           510,565
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              9,389,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       9,169,254
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                         15,953
<OTHER-SE>                                       (3,220,209)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,389,998
<SALES>                                          5,407,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,407,000
<CGS>                                       6,260,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,258,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (177,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (10,289,475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (10,289,475)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (10,289,475)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.75)


</TABLE>
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J AN 15, 2010 J OHN L EY ACTI NG CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 9- 11 17 7 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 9 7- 00 28 1- CR-2 -LSC-TM P UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A,
Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,
ve rs us TERAINO ADARRY BIVINS, a.k .a. Dog , a.k .a. Tho m as W

Mo on , Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ctof Al ab am a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (J an ua ry 15 , 20 10 ) Befo re EDMONDSON, BLACK an d ANDERSON, Ci rcu itJu dg es .PER CURI AM:

Jo se ph A. Ing ram , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Terai no Adarry Biv in s, i n t hi s di rectcri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto wit hd raw fro m fur th er re pr es en ta ti on an d fil eda br ie f pu rs ua ntto And ers v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2 d 4 93 (19 67 ). Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdco nf irms th at th ere a re n o i ss ue s o f arg uabl e m eri t o n app eal . There fo re, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wit hd raw i s GRANTED , andth e d is tri ctco urt’s o rd er re vo ki ng Biv in s’s
supe rv is edrel eas e an d i m po si ng hi s 2 4- m on th sen te nc e u nd er 1 8 U.S.C. § 3 58 3( e)(3 ) is AFFIRMED
.

2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David J. NobleDavid J. Noble Chairman/Director Principal Executive Officer


Date MAY 15, 2008
#### Allan Postil, an Infant, by Peter Postil, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. Coca Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by an infant plaintiff as a result of an alleged explosion of a bottle of Coca Cola carried by him in a shopping bag as he left the store where the purchase was made, the said plaintiff, by permission of this court, appeals from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, dated June 29, 1961, which reversed a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, entered December 9, 1960 after trial on a jury’s verdict of $650 in his favor, against the defendant bottling company, and which dismissed the complaint of said infant as to such defendant. Order affirmed, without costs. We find in this record no evidence that there was a defect in the bottle or that the tests made by defendant Bottling Company were inadequate or that it was otherwise negligent. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Romulo Tapia, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and a new trial ordered. Detective Martin was a material witness who in fairness to all parties should have been present at the trial. There was a material discrepancy between the testimony of the complaining witness at the trial as to the time and place of the alleged occurrence, his description of the assailants, the documentary evidence as to certain events, and his testimony as to what he allegedly told Detective Martin. There was a claim that Detective Martin misunderstood the complainant because of some language difficulty, though the complainant himself acknowledged that the detective spoke Spanish well. Identification was the crux of this ease and it assumes additional importance in light of the fact that defendant was not in a line-up and was the only person shown to eomplainant when he was identified at the precinct. While the District Attorney very graciously made a concession as to what Detective Martin’s testimony would be, we are persuaded that in the interests of justice a new trial is required. It might be noted that evidence of alibi need not in and of itself create a reasonable doubt, and a defendant is not obliged to show it was impossible for him to have committed the crime. “ If the proof as to an *alibi,*when taken into, consideration with all the other evidence, raises a reasonable *680doubt as to defendant’s guilt, he is entitled to an acquittal.” *(People*v. *Barb ato,*254 N. Y. 170, 179.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.; McNally, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.407 Commander, Naval Reserve Force.

Manages Naval Reserve resources. Responsible for providing limited support to the Naval Discharge Review Board. (See subpart C).
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Philip A. Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of Erie Family Life Insurance
Company, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Erie
Family Life Insurance Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors:  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 20, 2004 /s/ Philip A. GarciaPhilip A. Garcia, Executive Vice President & CFO
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT TO
                                PROMISSORY NOTES

This  MODIFICATION  AGREEMENT is made as of December  31, 2005 between  Infinite
Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation with offices at 595 Blossom Road, Suite 309,
Rochester,  NY 14610 ("Borrower") and Carle C. Conway, an individual residing at
10113 NE Kitsap Street, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 ("Lender").

WHEREAS,  Lender  is the  holder  of three (3)  Promissory  Notes  issued by the
Borrower to the Lender,  as described in more detail in the attached  Schedule A
(collectively, the Notes); and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify the terms and conditions of the Promissory
Notes as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

      1)    The Notes and each of them are  modified to provide that the time at
            which the entire  principal  balance and accrued and unpaid interest
            shall be due and payable is January 1, 2008.

      2)    Monthly  interest  payments  shall continue to be payable during the
            revised term of the Notes on the same day of every month as provided
            in each of the Notes.

      3)    Except as modified by this  Agreement,  all of the terms,  covenants
            and conditions of the Notes shall remain the same.

In witness  whereof,  Borrower and Lender have executed this Agreement under the
day and year first written above.

INFINITE GROUP, INC.


/s/ Michael S. Smith
--------------------
By: Michael S. Smith, President


/s/ Carle C. Conway
-------------------
    Carle C. Conway


<PAGE>

                    PROMISSORY NOTES OF INFINITE GROUP, INC.
                   IN FAVOR OF NORTHEAST HAMPTON HOLDINGS, LLC


Holder                                      Principal Amt                Date

Carle C. Conway                               $150,000                  8/13/03
Carle C. Conway                               $ 50,000                  1/16/04
Carle C. Conway                               $ 65,000                  3/11/04