alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James D. Stafford, Respondent, v. St. Clare’s Hospital, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of a burn on his left wrist due to a defective lamp while he was undergoing an operation in the defendant hospital for the removal of a cyst on his wrist, said defendant hospital appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 12, 1959, as is in favor of plaintiff and against the hospital, for $8,818.25, after a nonjury trial. Judgment insofar as appealed from affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### T. Fred Laramie, appellee, v. Yellow Cab Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,876.

Action to recover damage to automobile struck by defendant’s taxicab. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Richard V. Carpenter, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

McGreaham, Blake & Sharp, for appellant; I. Harvey Levinson, of counsel.

Joseph J. Kroupa, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
<PAGE>

                          Haifa, Israel, June 25, 2003

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-10570)
of our report dated March 6, 2003, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of Netvision Ltd. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2002, and for the
year then ended, which are included in the Elron Electronic Industries Ltd.
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                               /s/ Luboshitz Kasierer

                                               Luboshitz Kasierer
                              An affiliate member of Ernst & Young International
Exhibit 99

                   WINTHROP PARTNERS 80 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                               DECEMBER 31, 1996

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 9.4 OF THE PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT (UNAUDITED)

                                           Year Ended       Three Months Ended
                                           December 31,       December 31,
                                               1996               1996
                                        -----------------  -------------------

  1. Statement of Cash Available for
     Distribution:

     Net Income                               $  481,000           $232,000
     Add: Depreciation and amortization
          charged to income not affecting
          cash available for distribution         57,000             11,000
          Loss due to impairment of real
           estate                                600,000                  -
          Minimum lease payments received,
           net of interest income earned,
           on leases accounted for under the
           financing method                      347,000             91,000
          Proceeds from sale of property         141,000

     Less: Other                                  (2,000)            (1,000)
           Gain on sale of property              (57,000)                 -
                                              -----------          --------
     Cash Available for Distribution         $ 1,567,000           $333,000
                                             ============         =========
     Distributions allocated to General
      Partners                               $   114,000           $ 27,000
                                             ===========           ========
     Distributions allocated to Limited
      Partners                               $ 1,453,000           $306,000
                                             ==========            ========

  2. Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
     General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
     December 31, 1996:

  Entity Receiving                  Form of
  Compensation                      Compensation               Amount
  ----------------                  -------------              ------

  Winthrop Management         Property Management Fees        $ 5,000


  General Partners            Interest in Cash Available
                               for Distribution               $27,000

  WFC Realty Co., Inc.        Interest in Cash Available for
  (Initial Limited Partner)    Distribution                   $ 1,400
### §2224a. Utilization of employees of agencies for part-time and intermittent assistance to other agencies; exclusion of overtime resulting from natural disasters from staff year ceilings

On and after October 28, 1991, notwithstanding any other provision of law, employees of the agencies of the Department of Agriculture, including employees of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation county committees, may be utilized to provide part-time and intermittent assistance to other agencies of the Department, without reimbursement, during periods when they are not otherwise fully utilized, and ceilings on full-time equivalent staff years established for or by the Department of Agriculture shall exclude overtime as well as staff years expended as a result of carrying out programs associated with natural disasters, such as forest fires, droughts, floods, and other acts of God.

(Pub. L. 102–142, title VII, §711, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 912.)
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Fact-Finding Activities of the Bureau of Labor Statistics

              																	Hosea, Harold R.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Fact-Finding Activities of the Bureau of Labor Statistics : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 831*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4303,			accessed on September 19, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 750.31 Reconsideration. ( a ) *Request.* Prior to the commencement of suit and prior to the expiration of the 6-month period for filing suit, a claimant or his duly authorized agent or legal representative may present a request for reconsideration to the authority who denied the claim. The request shall be in writing and shall state the reasons for the requested reconsideration. A request for reconsideration is presented on the date it is received by the DON. 28 CFR 14.9(b).
( b ) *Proper basis.* A request for reconsideration shall set forth claimant's reasons for the request, and shall include any supplemental supporting evidence or information. Any writing communicating a desire for reconsideration that reasonably appears to have been presented solely for the purpose of extending the statutory period for filing suit, shall not be treated as a request for reconsideration. Claimant or claimant's authorized representative shall be notified promptly that the writing is not considered a proper request for reconsideration.
( c ) *Effect of presentment of request.* The presentment of a proper request for reconsideration starts a new 6-month period for the DON to act on the request to reconsider. The claimant may not file suit until the expiration of the new 6-month period, or until after the date of mailing of the final denial of the request. Final denial of a request for reconsideration shall be accomplished in the manner prescribed in § 750.30. 28 CFR 14.9(b).
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 65305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25792]

[[Page 65305]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)

AGENCY: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a Board meeting of the State Energy 
Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463; 86 Stat.770) requires that public notice of these meetings be 
announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: December 3, 2013: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; December 4, 2013 9:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Fairfax at Embassy Row, 2100 Massachusetts Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Hughes, STEAB Designated Federal 
Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585; 
telephone: (202) 320-9703, or by email at: Julie.Hughes@ee.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to the Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative 
policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's responsibilities as 
designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 
1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Receive in-person updates and reviews of 
accomplishment of STEAB's Subcommittee and Taskforces, meet with key 
members of DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
(EERE) to discuss current initiatives and programs, participate in 
round-table discussions with EERE Program Directors, explore energy 
innovative financing options, discuss strategic planning opportunities, 
and update the Board on routine business matters and other topics of 
interest.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Julie Hughes at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must 
be received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will 
be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the 
Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 90 days on the STEAB Web site, www.steab.org.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on October 24, 2013.
LaTanya Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-25792 Filed 10-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
### §1102. National Domestic Preparedness Consortium

#### (a) In general

The Secretary is authorized to establish, operate, and maintain a National Domestic Preparedness Consortium within the Department.

#### (b) Members

Members of the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium shall consist of—

(1) the Center for Domestic Preparedness;

(2) the National Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology;

(3) the National Center for Biomedical Research and Training, Louisiana State University;

(4) the National Emergency Response and Rescue Training Center, Texas A&M University;

(5) the National Exercise, Test, and Training Center, Nevada Test Site;

(6) the Transportation Technology Center, Incorporated, in Pueblo, Colorado; and

(7) the National Disaster Preparedness Training Center, University of Hawaii.

#### (c) Duties

The National Domestic Preparedness Consortium shall identify, develop, test, and deliver training to State, local, and tribal emergency response providers, provide on-site and mobile training at the performance and management and planning levels, and facilitate the delivery of training by the training partners of the Department.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary—

(1) for the Center for Domestic Preparedness—

(A) $57,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;

(B) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;

(C) $63,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; and

(D) $66,000,000 for fiscal year 2011; and

(2) for the National Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center, the National Center for Biomedical Research and Training, the National Emergency Response and Rescue Training Center, the National Exercise, Test, and Training Center, the Transportation Technology Center, Incorporated, and the National Disaster Preparedness Training Center each—

(A) $22,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;

(B) $23,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;

(C) $24,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; and

(D) $25,500,000 for fiscal year 2011.

#### (e) Savings provision

From the amounts appropriated pursuant to this section, the Secretary shall ensure that future amounts provided to each of the following entities are not less than the amounts provided to each such entity for participation in the Consortium in fiscal year 2007—

(1) the Center for Domestic Preparedness;

(2) the National Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology;

(3) the National Center for Biomedical Research and Training, Louisiana State University;

(4) the National Emergency Response and Rescue Training Center, Texas A&M University; and

(5) the National Exercise, Test, and Training Center, Nevada Test Site.

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XII, §1204, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 386.)
#### § 874.16 Contractor eligibility.

To receive moneys from the Fund or Treasury funds provided to uncertified States and Indian tribes under § 872.29 of this chapter or to certified States or Indian tribes for coal AML reclamation as required to maintain certification under section 411(a) of SMCRA, every successful bidder for an AML contract must be eligible under §§ 773.12, 773.13, and 773.14 of this chapter at the time of contract award to receive a permit or be provisionally issued a permit to conduct surface coal mining operations.

[73 FR 67639, Nov. 14, 2008]
### §402–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 402–1, comprising section 101A of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3022 of this title.
#### § 720.25 Repossession of personal property.

Repossession of personal property, located on a Navy or Marine Corps installation, belonging to a member or to any dependent residing at or located on a Department of the Navy installation, may be permitted in the discretion of the commanding officer of the installation where the property is located, subject to the following. The documents purporting to authorize repossession and the procedures for repossessing the property must comply with State law. Prior to permitting physical repossession of any property, the commanding officer shall cause an informal inquiry into the circumstances and then determine whether to allow the repossession. If repossession is to be allowed, the person whose property is to be repossessed should be asked if he wishes to relinquish the property voluntarily. Repossession must be carried out in a manner prescribed by the commanding officer. In the case of property owned by civilian employees of the Department of the Navy or civilian contractors or their employees or dependents, the commanding officer should direct that the disputed property be removed from the installation until the commanding officer is satisfied that the dispute is resolved.
#### § 536.123 Limitation of liability for maritime claims.

For admiralty claims arising within the United States under the provisions of the Limitation of Shipowners' Liability Act, 46 U.S.C. app. 181-188, in cases alleging injury or loss due to negligent operation of its vessel, the United States may limit its liability to the value of its vessel after the incident from which the claim arose. The act requires filing of an action in federal District Court within six months of receiving written notice of a claim. Therefore, USARCS, or the Chief Counsel, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), or his designee, must be notified within 10 working days of the receipt of any maritime claim arising in the United States or on the high seas out of the operation of an Army vessel, including pleasure craft owned by the United States. USARCS or Chief Counsel, COE will coordinate with the Department of Justice (DOJ) as to whether to file a limitation of liability action.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24


                           AMERICAN VANTAGE COMPANIES
                          7674 WEST LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD
                             LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89128

                                                  September 27, 2002

Mr. Ronald J. Tassinari
7889 Rancho Mirage Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada  89113

                  Re:      Employment Agreement

Dear Ron:

                  This letter shall serve to confirm and memorialize my
agreement, in my capacity as Chairman of the Compensation Committee (the
"Compensation Committee") of the Board of Directors of American Vantage
Companies ("AVC"), with you, in your capacity as an officer and employee of AVC,
that, notwithstanding the terms of paragraph 2(c) of the Employment Agreement,
dated as of April 1, 2002 (the "Employment Agreement"), between AVC and you,
that the term of the Employment Agreement be extended until November 30, 2002 on
the same terms and conditions as are set forth in the Employment Agreement, with
the exception of said paragraph 2(c). It is agreed among us that the reason for
such extension is provide AVC, acting through the Compensation Committee, and
you ample time to negotiate, execute and deliver a new employment agreement
between AVC and you for a term to expire on March 31, 2005, or such other date
as may mutually be agreed upon.

                  If the foregoing accurately reflects our agreement with
respect to the extension of the Employment Agreement, please indicate such in
the space indicated below.


                                      Very truly yours,

                                      American Vantage Companies


                                      By:        /s/ Steven Barringer
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Steven Barringer
                                          Chairman of the Compensation Committee

Acknowledged and accepted
as of the date first set forth above:


/s/ Ronald J. Tassinari
---------------------------
    Ronald J. Tassinari
#### DWYER v. MARGONO

No. 26P98

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 122

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 March 1998.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. James W. Monahan, Respondent.

Appeal unanimously dismissed on the ground that the order is not appealable. (See Code Grim. Pro., § 518, subd. 4.) (Appeal by People from order of Monroe County Court granting a hearing upon application for issuance of a writ of error *eoram nobis.)*Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
#### § 750.24 Statutory/regulatory authority.

The statutory provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) are at 28 U.S.C. 1346(b), 2671-2672, and 2674-2680. The Attorney General of the United States has issued regulations on administrative claims filed under the FTCA at 28 CFR part 14. If the provisions of this section and the Attorney General's regulations conflict, the Attorney General's regulations prevail.
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.117 Discharge review.

A nonadversary administrative reappraisal at the level of the Navy Department of discharges from the naval service. The object of the reappraisal is to determine whether the discharge should be changed, and if so, the nature of the change. This reappraisal includes the type and reason/basis for separation, the procedures followed in accomplishing separation, and the characterization of service. This term includes determinations made under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 3103(2).
#### §§ 751.15-751.20 [Reserved]
#### § 37.825 Must I require the recipient to obtain prior approval from the Government for changes in plans?

If it is an expenditure-based award, your agreement must require the recipient to obtain the agreement administrator's prior approval if there is to be a change in plans that results in a need for additional Federal funding (this is unnecessary for a fixed-support TIA because the recipient is responsible for additional costs of achieving the outcomes). Other than that, the program official's substantial involvement in the project should ensure that the Government has advance notice of changes in plans.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 26 ) IV-B-2 2 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:52 AM Sheet 26 of 232P. 2 

# 4-87-1 1 f*sfa\ \ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y|V ~ B " 2 2 . r^| ^ ° AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 48105 

# X ^ OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N
MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : Opportunit yFo r AIA MInpu t o nOnboar d Vapo r Recover y FROM : Glen nw . Passavant , Chie f j&c8ft ~ COt^^c^^Z/

1 Specia l Regulator yProject s Branc h TO : Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 O nJanuar y22 , 199 3 th e U.S . Cour t o f Appeal s fo r th e D.C . Circui t lissue d a nopinio n causin g EP At o reinstitut e it s rulemakin g fo r onboar d vapo r recover ystandards . I nresponse , EP Aha s decide d t o prepar e a Federa l Registe r notic e reopenin g th e commen t perio d an d discussin g th e ke yissue s an d area s i nth e onboar d vapo r recover yNPR Man d notic e o f Augus t 198 7 an d Septembe r 1991 , respectively . O nMarc h10 , 199 3 I contacte d Susa n Tasjia no f th e Associatio n o f Internationa l Automobil e Manufacturer s (AIAM) . Th e purpos e o f mycal l wa s t o offe r AIA Man d it s membe r companie s a nopportunit y t o provid e EP Ainpu t o nwha t issue s an d area s shoul d b e addresse d i nth e forthcomin g notice . I state d tha t anyinpu t shoul d b e i n writin g an d tha t i norde r fo r u s t o mov e expeditiousl yi n developin g th e notic e i t mus t b e receive d no t late r tha nMarc h19 , 1993 .

p \ '. '