alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Documentation of Phone Calls to Tribes Affected By California Reclassifications for 8-Hour Ozone

Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division, called Steven Estrada of the Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians and Marshall Cheung of the T wenty-Nine Palms Band of Luiseño Mission Indians on Tuesday, Dec. 1, 2009. Colleen communicated to b oth tribes that we had inadvertently omitted them from the list of tribes who would be impacted b y the reclassification of the Coachella Valley NAA from Serious to Severe-15. Region 9 had been communi cating with both tribes regarding the reclassification action for their tribal lands locate d in other nonattainment areas, but did not realize that both tribes had tribal lands in Coachella Valley as well.
Marshall Cheung of Twenty-Nine Palms requested a copy of EPA's July 31, 2008, letter in which we invited consultation with tribes on the reclassificat ions, as he did not remember receiving it. Colleen committed to emailing Marshall a copy of the letter.
(Note: Per the paragraph above, Rory Mays emailed th e copy of the letter to Marshall Cheung on Tuesday, Dec. 1, 2009.)
#### § 552.162 Abbreviations.

See appendix F to this subpart.
#### § 552.170 Camp Bonneville Area Access Office.

Camp Bonneville Range Control (CBRC) functions as Area Access.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         346,783
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,596,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,596,783
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               311,460
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   303,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



                  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
                           Section 906 Certifications



     Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  enacted  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-204), the undersigned, H. Craig Dees,
Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Provectus Pharmaceuticals,  Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), and Peter R. Culpepper, the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify that:

1.   The Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended  December
     31, 2002, as filed with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange Commission on the
     date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


     This Certification is signed on March 30, 2004.



                                            /s/ H. Craig Dees
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           H. Craig Dees, Ph.D.
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           Provectus Pharmaceuticals,Inc.



                                            /s/ Peter R. Culpepper
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Peter R. Culpepper
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
190 So. 125

#### GRISAMORE v. BRENNAN.

No. 35081.

May 29, 1939.

*1047Arthur B. Leopold, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Maurice B. Gatlin, of New Orleans, for appellee.

PONDER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the defendant’s rule for alimony pendente lite.

The plaintiff instituted a suit against the defendant for separation from bed and board on the ground of abandonment. The defendant in her answer denied that she had abandoned the plaintiff and by way of reconventional demand claimed that the plaintiff had abandoned her and asked for a judgment in her favor for. separation from bed and board. The defendant ruled the plaintiff to show cause why he should not be condemned to pay the defendant $9 per week alimony during the pendency of the suit. At the trial of the rule the plaintiff proposed to receive his wife in a residence occupied by his parents. The trial judge dismissed the defendant’s rule and the defendant has appealed.

After the appeal was lodged in this Court, the plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal. In the motion to dismiss the appeal the plaintiff virtually challenged the merit of the defendant’s demand for alimony pendente'lite and in passing on the motion to dismiss the appeal it was necessary for this Court to decide as to the merit of the defendant’s claim. This Court denied the motion to dismiss the appeal setting forth reasons therefor. When this case came up for hearing on the appeal the counsel, for both the appellant and appellee, stated in open court that the decision rendered on the motion to dismiss the appeal disposed of the point in controversy. The counsel submitted the matter without argument. Having determined that the defendant is entitled to alimony during the pendency of the suit, in passing on the motion to dismiss the appeal, it is unnecessary for us to again discuss that issue. We set forth our reasons and reviewed the previous decisions of this Court when we overruled the motion to dismiss the appeal and it could serve no good purpose to reiterate the reasons and again review the previous decisions of this Court. Grisamore v. Grisamore, 191 La. 770, 186 So. 98.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and set aside and it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, condemning the plaintiff to pay the defendant $9 per week alimony during the pendency of this suit. The plaintiff to pay all costs.

FOURNET, J., absent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,329,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               48,202,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,634,000
<INVENTORY>                                 84,254,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           157,842,000
<PP&E>                                     487,011,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             172,736,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             509,086,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      121,794,000
<BONDS>                                    402,567,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       151,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (84,341,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               509,086,000
<SALES>                                    285,442,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           285,442,000
<CGS>                                      216,014,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              216,014,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               842,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          33,673,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (28,618,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,604,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (27,014,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (27,014,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.81)


</TABLE>
### §965. Tier 2 participants in C–TPAT

#### (a) Validation

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall validate the security measures and supply chain security practices of a Tier 1 participant in accordance with the guidelines referred to in subsection (c). Such validation shall include on-site assessments at appropriate foreign locations utilized by the Tier 1 participant in its supply chain and shall, to the extent practicable, be completed not later than 1 year after certification as a Tier 1 participant.

#### (b) Benefits

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall extend benefits to each C–TPAT participant that has been validated as a Tier 2 participant under this section, which may include—

(1) reduced scores in the Automated Targeting System;

(2) reduced examinations of cargo; and

(3) priority searches of cargo.

#### (c) Guidelines

Not later than 180 days after October 13, 2006, the Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall develop a schedule and update the guidelines for validating a participant's security measures and supply chain security practices under this section.

(Pub. L. 109–347, title II, §215, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1910.)
### §1032a. Disbursing and certifying officers; exemption from liability for advances to defense relocation corporations

The Comptroller General of the United States is authorized and directed to allow credit in the accounts of disbursing and certifying officers for advances made in good faith on behalf of the Department of Agriculture to defense relocation corporations and land purchasing associations.

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 964, §6, 60 Stat. 1079.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 82h of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877. Section was not enacted as a part of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act, which constitutes a major part of this chapter.
EXHIBIT 32 (b)

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection   with  the  Annual  Report  of  Enzo  Biochem,   Inc.,  and
Subsidiaries  ("the  Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended July 31,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, Barry  Weiner,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  October 12, 2006                          By: /s/ Barry Weiner
                                                     ----------------
                                                         Barry Weiner
                                                         Chief Financial Officer



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHelistat simulation studiesAn analysis of the flight dynamics and piloted control characteristics of the Helistat, a quadrotor heavy-lift airship, was completed using the HYBRDS airship simulation facility. The analysis covered the full operating flight envelope, including likely ranges of altitude, airspeed, sideslip, and loading variations. Particular areas of study were performance, trim, power requirements, linearized dynamics, handling qualities, and mooring operations. The key assumptions were: a rigid vehicle, no control system dynamics, fixed rotor and propeller RPM, and no ballonet dynamics. The nominal cruise speed for the H34 engines operating at 1275 HP was found to be 40-50 kts, depending on the loading condition. The maximum payload capability was calculated as 45,000 lbs for sea level-based operations. The crosswind capability in hover is 5-10 kts depending on the loading conditions, but this requires excessive roll angle due to the roll-to-translate control gearing. Sideslip angles of 110-135 degrees (wind from aft quarters) are critical for directional trim and stability, and should be avoided.Document ID19840012496Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTischler, M. B.*(Systems Technology, Inc. Hawthorne, CA, United States)*Ashkenas, I. L.*(Systems Technology, Inc. Hawthorne, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1982Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:166567NASA-CR-166567STI-TR-1151-3Accession Number84N20564Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-10330Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840012496.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 15.2  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors Sasol Limited:  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-184526) on Form F-3 of Sasol Limited of our report dated 9 October 2013, except as to Notes 1, 7, 39, 62 and 63, which are as of 5 September 2014, with respect to the consolidated statement of financial position of Sasol Limited as of 30 June 2013 and the related consolidated income statements and statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period then ended, which report appears in the 30 June 2014 Annual Report on Form 20-F of Sasol Limited.  Our report refers to a change to the method of accounting for consolidations and joint arrangements as well as updating changes in disclosures in respect of interests in other entities.  /s/ KPMG Inc.   Johannesburg, South Africa  29 September 2014
### §201. "Stockyard owner"; "stockyard services"; "market agency"; "dealer"; defined

In this chapter:

(a) The term "stockyard owner" means any person engaged in the business of conducting or operating a stockyard.

(b) The term "stockyard services" means services or facilities furnished at a stockyard in connection with the receiving, buying, or selling on a commission basis or otherwise, marketing, feeding, watering, holding, delivery, shipment, weighing, or handling in commerce, of livestock.

(c) The term "market agency" means any person engaged in the business of (1) buying or selling in commerce livestock on a commission basis or (2) furnishing stockyard services. Beginning on October 7, 2016, such term includes any person who engages in the business of buying or selling livestock, on a commission or other fee basis, through the use of online, video, or other electronic methods when handling or providing the means to handle receivables or proceeds from such buying or selling, so long as such person's annual average of online, video, or electronic sales of livestock, on a commission or other fee basis, exceeds $250,000.

(d) The term "dealer" means any person, not a market agency, engaged in the business of buying or selling in commerce livestock, either on his own account or as the employee or agent of the vendor or purchaser.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title III, §301, 42 Stat. 163; Pub. L. 85–909, §2(1), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1750; Pub. L. 94–410, §3(c), Sept. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 1249; Pub. L. 114–237, §2, Oct. 7, 2016, 130 Stat. 970.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–237, §2(b)(1), substituted "In this chapter:" for "When used in this chapter—" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–237, §2(b)(2), substituted period for semicolon at end.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–237, §2(b)(3)(B), substituted period for semicolon at end.

Pub. L. 114–237, §2(b)(3)(A), which directed amendment of subsec. (b) by substituting "weighing" for "weighting", could not be executed because the word "weighing" already appeared in text.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–237, §2(a), substituted period for "; and" after "stockyard services" and inserted at end "Beginning on October 7, 2016, such term includes any person who engages in the business of buying or selling livestock, on a commission or other fee basis, through the use of online, video, or other electronic methods when handling or providing the means to handle receivables or proceeds from such buying or selling, so long as such person's annual average of online, video, or electronic sales of livestock, on a commission or other fee basis, exceeds $250,000."

1976—Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 94–410 substituted "livestock" for "live stock".

1958—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 85–909 struck out "at a stockyard" after "livestock".
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 45217/45218

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ANITA MARIE TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 330

Filed: January 18, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker, District Judge. 

Judgments of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of life with eight years

determinate for grand theft; two counts of forgery; criminal possession of a 

financial transaction card; possession of forged stolen notes, bank bills, or checks; 

and possession of amphetamine, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Anita Marie Taylor pled guilty to grand theft (Idaho Code §§ 18-2403(1), 18-

2407(1)(b)(1), 18-2409, 18-204), with a persistent violator enhancement (I.C. § 19-2514); two 

counts of forgery (I.C. § 18-3601); criminal possession of a financial transaction card (I.C. 

§§ 18-3125, 18-3128); possession of forged stolen notes, bank bills, or checks (I.C. § 18-3605); 

and possession of amphetamine (I.C. § 37-2732(c)(1)), with a persistent violator enhancement
2

(I.C. § 19-2514). The district court imposed concurrent unified sentences of life with eight years 

determinate. Taylor appeals, contending that her sentences are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Taylor’s judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22

- 0742

LITTLE BIG WARM RANCH, LLC, and MARK FRENCH Plaintiffs and Appellants
,

v.

WILFRED DOLL, Defendant, Appellee and Cross

Appellant
,
BRIAN ROBINSON, Defendant

. ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSE AND CROSS

MOTION OPENING BRIEF

Pursuant to the authority granted under M.R.App.P. 26(1), Appell ee and

Cross Appellant Willie Doll is granted an extension of time until June 5, 2023 to

prepare, file and serve Appell ee’s combined response and cross

- appeal brief.

Dated this day of _________, 2023.

______________________ Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court

Cc: Monica Tranel, Ross Miller
, Hertha Lund, Ben Stormes

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 20 2023

04/20/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0742
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER


THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND SECTION 1350 OF


CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE





Each of the undersigned, H. Craig Dees and Peter R. Culpepper, certifies, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that (1) this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 of Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and (2) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This Certification is signed on July 22, 2011.





/s/ H. Craig DeesH. Craig Dees, Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer/s/ Peter R. CulpepperChief Financial OfficerChief Operating Officer