alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §213. Prevention of unfair, discriminatory, or deceptive practices

(a) It shall be unlawful for any stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer to engage in or use any unfair, unjustly discriminatory, or deceptive practice or device in connection with determining whether persons should be authorized to operate at the stockyards, or with the receiving, marketing, buying, or selling on a commission basis or otherwise, feeding, watering, holding, delivery, shipment, weighing, or handling of livestock.

(b) Whenever complaint is made to the Secretary by any person, or whenever the Secretary has reason to believe, that any stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer is violating the provisions of subsection (a), the Secretary after notice and full hearing may make an order that he shall cease and desist from continuing such violation to the extent that the Secretary finds that it does or will exist. The Secretary may also assess a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each such violation. In determining the amount of the civil penalty to be assessed under this section, the Secretary shall consider the gravity of the offense, the size of the business involved, and the effect of the penalty on the person's ability to continue in business. If, after the lapse of the period allowed for appeal or after the affirmance of such penalty, the person against whom the civil penalty is assessed fails to pay such penalty, the Secretary may refer the matter to the Attorney General who may recover such penalty by an action in the appropriate district court of the United States.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title III, §312, 42 Stat. 167; Pub. L. 85–909, §2(5), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1750; Pub. L. 90–446, §1(e), July 31, 1968, 82 Stat. 475; Pub. L. 94–410, §3, Sept. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 1249.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–410, §3(a), (c), struck out "in commerce" after "or handling" and substituted "livestock" for "live stock".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–410, §3(b), inserted provisions dealing with authority of Secretary to assess a civil penalty for violations and, upon failure to pay, procedure for recovery of such penalty.

1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–446 inserted "determining whether persons should be authorized to operate at stockyards, or with" after "in connection with".

1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–909 struck out "at a stockyard" after "in commerce".
### Stratigraphy and structure of the western Kentucky fluorspar district

By: R. D. TraceD.H. Amos

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1151D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §1858. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–544, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 658

Section, act May 28, 1956, ch. 327, title II, §209, 70 Stat. 201, established a bipartisan Commission on Increased Industrial Use of Agricultural Products.
§ 631.10 Administration. ( a ) Commanders are authorized to acquire, report, process, and store information concerning persons and organizations, whether or not affiliated with DOD, according to the applicable Service parts of the sponsoring commander, which— ( 1 ) Adversely affect the health, safety, morale, welfare, or discipline of service members regardless of status.
( 2 ) Describes crime conducive conditions where there is a direct Service interest.
( b ) Boards will function under the supervision of a president (§ 631.7(b)).
( c ) Certain expenses incurred by Service members in the course of an official board investigation or inspection may be reimbursable per appropriate Service finance parts or instructions. Requests for reimbursement will be submitted through the sponsoring commander.
( d ) Records of board proceedings will be maintained as prescribed by records management policies, and procedures of the sponsoring commander's Service.
### §2668. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–419, title V, §508, Aug. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 674, related to Secretary's authority to promulgate such regulations as might be necessary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter, prior to the general revision of this subchapter by Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1444(a), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1322. See section 2667 of this title.
### §4203. Existing policies and procedures; review, etc.

(a) Each department, agency, independent commission, or other unit of the Federal Government, with the assistance of the Department of Agriculture, shall review current provisions of law, administrative rules and regulations, and policies and procedures applicable to it to determine whether any provision thereof will prevent such unit of the Federal Government from taking appropriate action to comply fully with the provisions of this chapter.

(b) Each department, agency, independent commission, or other unit of the Federal Government, with the assistance of the Department of Agriculture, shall, as appropriate, develop proposals for action to bring its programs, authorities, and administrative activities into conformity with the purpose and policy of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1542, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1343.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective six months after Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1549 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as a note under section 4201 of this title.
§ 761.2 Background and general policy. ( a ) Certain areas, due to their strategic nature or for purposes of defense, have been subjected to restrictions regarding the free entry of persons, ships, and aircraft. Free entry into the areas listed and defined in this part, and military installations contiguous to or within the boundaries of defense areas, is subject to control as provided for by Executive order or other regulation. The object of controls over entry into naval defensive sea areas, naval airspace reservations, administrative areas, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, is to provide for the protection of military installations as well as other facilities, including the personnel, property, and equipment assigned to or located therein. Persons, ships, and aircraft are excluded unless and until they qualify for admission under the applicable Executive order or regulation.
( b ) The control of entry into or movement within defense areas by persons, ships, or aircraft will be exercised so as to fully protect the physical security of, and insure the full effectiveness of, bases, stations, facilities and other installations within or contiguous to defense areas. However, unnecessary interference with the free movement of persons, ships, and aircraft is to be avoided.
( c ) This part will be administered so as to provide for the prompt processing of all applications and to insure uniformity of interpretation and application, insofar as changing conditions permit.
( d ) In cases of doubt, the determination will be made in favor of the course of action which will best serve the interests of the United States and national defense as distinguished from the private interests of an individual or group.
[28 FR 13778, Dec. 18, 1963, as amended at 35 FR 10008, June 18, 1970]
|  Subsidiairy                                             |  State      of Incorporation |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|  Xantech      Pharmaceuticals, Inc.                      |  Tennessee                   |
|  Pure-ific      Corporation                              |  Nevada                      |
|  Provectus      Biotech, Inc.                            |  Tennessee                   |
|  Provectus      Devicetech, Inc.     |  Tennessee                   |
|  Provectus      Imaging, Inc.                            |  Tennessee                   |
|  IP Tech,      Inc.                                      |  Tennessee                   |
|  Provectus      Pharmatech, Inc.                         |  Tennessee                   |
#### Louis Forster, appellee, v. S. Deiches & Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,303.

Action to recover premiums on life insurance policies agreed to be paid by defendant. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frank E. Reed, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Reversed.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Fisehel & Kahn, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice O ’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1417 

Honoring the BAPS Hindu-American community and the 50th Anniversary 

of its Mandir in Flushing, New York. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 30, 2024 

Ms. MENG submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the BAPS Hindu-American community and the 

50th Anniversary of its Mandir in Flushing, New York. 

Whereas the Bochansanwasi Akshar Purushottom 

Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS) is a pillar of the HinduAmerican community, providing spiritual guidance, community service, and cultural enrichment; 

Whereas BAPS has grown to an international movement with 

millions of followers, dedicated to the pillars of practical 

spirituality and Hindu values, traditions, and charitable 

activities; 

Whereas the BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir in Flushing, 

New York, was established 50 years ago and has since 

become a beacon of faith, culture, and community service 

in the region; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1417 IH 

Whereas the Mandir has served as a place of worship, education, and cultural preservation, offering various programs and services to individuals of all ages, backgrounds, and beliefs; 

Whereas the BAPS community has consistently contributed 

to society by participating in civil society organizations, 

interfaith dialogues, health fairs, educational programs, 

and disaster relief efforts; 

Whereas the dedication and commitment of the BAPS volunteers and devotees have positively impacted the lives of 

countless individuals, fostering a sense of unity, compassion, and service; and 

Whereas the celebration of the 50th anniversary of the BAPS 

Shri Swaminarayan Mandir in Flushing, New York, is a 

significant milestone that reflects the enduring legacy 

and contributions of the BAPS Hindu-American community: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the BAPS Hindu-American commu3 nity for its contributions to the spiritual, cultural, 

4 and social fabric of the United States; 

5 (2) commends the BAPS Shri Swaminarayan 

6 Mandir in Flushing, New York, on its 50th anniver7 sary and acknowledges its role in fostering commu8 nity service, cultural preservation, and spiritual en9 richment; 

10 (3) recognizes the dedication and efforts of the 

11 BAPS volunteers and devotees who have served the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1417 IH 

1 community and upheld the values of compassion, 

2 unity, and service; and 

3 (4) expresses its best wishes for the continued 

4 growth, prosperity, and success of the BAPS Hindu5 American community and the BAPS Shri 

6 Swaminarayan Mandir in Flushing, New York. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Dated May 10, 2006



Commission File Number: 001-14666



MITTAL STEEL COMPANY N.V.

(Translation of registrants name into English)



15th Floor, Hofplein 20

3032 AC Rotterdam

The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-FxForm 40-Fo



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



YesoNox



If Yes marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________





















---









On May 9, 2006, Mittal Steel Company N.V. issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.



Exhibit List



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                                                     | 
|------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated May 9, 2006, announcing that Mittal Steel Company N.V. will appoint Francois Pinault as Independent Non-Executive Director.











| |  | 
| |  | 











| | 2 | 
| | - | 





---









SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: May 10, 2006



| | By: | /s/Henk Scheffer
| | --- | ----------------
| |     | Name:           
| |     | Title:          















| | 3 | 
| | - | 





---













Exhibit Index



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                                                     | 
|------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated May 9, 2006, announcing that Mittal Steel Company N.V. will appoint Francois Pinault as Independent Non-Executive Director.











| | 4 | 
| | - |
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1586 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of Mid-America Transplant. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2024 

Mr. BOST submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of Mid-America 

Transplant. 

Whereas Mid-America Transplant has facilitated lifesaving 

organ, tissue, and eye donation in 84 counties in southern Illinois, eastern Missouri, and northeast Arkansas 

that together are home to 4.7 million Americans; 

Whereas Mid-America Transplant has stewarded the gift of 

life for more than 6,000 organ donors and nearly 40,000 

tissue and eye donors, saving and healing the lives of 2.9 

million people since its founding in 1974; 

Whereas Mid-America Transplant has stood as an innovator 

among organ procurement organizations, becoming the 

first in the United States to build an in-house operating 

room for organ recovery and pioneering many clinical adVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:12 Nov 21, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1586.IH HR1586

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1586 IH 

vancements to increase the quality and quantity of organs and tissues for transplant; 

Whereas Mid-America Transplant was the first organ procurement organization to be recognized as a recipient of 

the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award for Performance Excellence, and the only one to receive the 

honor twice; and 

Whereas Mid-America Transplant continues to lead the organ 

procurement organization industry in advocating for 

greater accountability and standardized performance 

metrics so all Americans may be served by a high-performing organ procurement organization: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commemorates the 50th anniversary of Mid3 America Transplant; and 

4 (2) celebrates the excellent work to save lives by 

5 delivering high-quality organ and tissue donation 

6 services. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Paul M. Joeckel, the Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Exploration Company, (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 12, 2005



/s/ Paul M. JoeckelName: Paul M. JoeckelTitle: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of Sasol Limited (Sasol) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management is required to assess the effectiveness of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether the Company's internal control over financial reporting is
effective.

Sasol's
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide
reasonable assurance as to the reliability of Sasol's financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorisations of our management and directors; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.

Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management
assessed the effectiveness of Sasol's internal control over financial reporting as of 30 June 2014. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in "Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (1992)". Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of
30 June 2014, Sasol's internal control over financial reporting was effective.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.,
an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an opinion on the effectiveness of Sasol's internal control over financial reporting as
stated in their report which appears herein.

Date: 29 September 2014By:

/s/ DAVID EDWARD CONSTABLEDavid Edward Constable President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: 29 September 2014By:

/s/ PAUL VICTORPaul Victor Acting Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.104 Definitions. This section defines terms which are used within this subpart. ( a ) *Medical Cost Reimbursement Program Regional Field Offices.* The Chief of the Medical Cost Reimbursement Program (MCRP) Branch determines and assigns geographic responsibility for all regional field offices. Each field office is responsible for investigating all potential claims and asserting claims within their jurisdiction for the cost of medical care provided by either a Medical Treatment Facility or at a civilian facility through Tricare.
( b ) *Compromise.* A mutually binding agreement where payment is made and accepted in an amount less than the full amount of the claim.
( c ) *Injured party.* The person who received medical care for injury or disease as a result of the incident on which the claim is based. The injured party may be represented by a guardian, personal representative, estate, or survivor.
( d ) *Medical care.* Includes medical and dental treatment, prostheses, and medical appliances the U.S. furnished or reimbursed other sources for providing.
( e ) *Reasonable value of medical care.* Either: ( 1 ) An amount determined by reference to rates set by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget for the value of necessary medical care in U.S. medical facilities.
( 2 ) The actual cost of necessary care from other sources which was reimbursed by the United States.
( f ) *Third party.* An individual, partnership, business, corporation (including insurance carriers), which is indebted to the United States for medical care provided to an injured party. (In some cases, a state or foreign government can be the third party.)
( g ) *Waiver.* The voluntary relinquishment by the United States of the right to collect for medical care provided to an injured party.
( h ) *Accrued pay.* The total of all pay accrued to the account of an active duty member during a period when the member is unable to perform military duties. It does not include allowances.
( i ) *Future care.* Medical care reasonably expected to be provided or paid for in the future treatment of an injured party as determined during the investigative process.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83698, Nov. 22, 2016]