alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 4 (Thursday, January 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 1122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME:  January 14, 2021, at 3:00 p.m.

PLACE: Potomac, MD.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    Thursday, January 14, 2021, at 3:00 p.m.
    1. Strategic Items.
    2. Administrative Items.
    GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The General Counsel of the United 
States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed 
under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michael J. Elston, Secretary of 
the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Michael J. Elston,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-00117 Filed 1-5-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         224,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,068,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                    159,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,460,748
<PP&E>                                         946,193
<DEPRECIATION>                               (791,915)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,017,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,350,347
<BONDS>                                      2,256,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       498,827
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,087,572)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,017,859
<SALES>                                      5,051,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,051,077
<CGS>                                        3,035,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,035,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,655,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,640,130)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (165,599)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,805,729)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,805,729)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,805,729)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.55)
        

</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-4266

___________ Herbert Phillip Malone, * * Appellant , * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Steve Walton, Infirmar y * District Court for the Administrator/Manager, Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas. Department of Correction; PHP * Healthcare Corporation, (Originally * [UNPUBLISHED] sued as P.H.P. Medical Group), * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 6, 1999 Filed: May 11, 1999

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Herbert P. Malone appeals the judgment of the district court 1 dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following a bench trial. Because Malone did not provide a trial-2-

transcript, we cannot review the court’s factual findings, Malone’s claim of judicial bias, or the denial of his evidentiary motions, including his motions to call witnesses. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Van Treese v. Blome , 7 F.3d 729, 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). Based on the district court’s factual findings, we conclude the court properly rejected Malone’s medical indifference claim. See D ulany v. Carnahan , 132 F.3d 1234, 1239 (8th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 552.213 Policy. ( a ) Aberdeen Proving Ground is a non-public forum and is open for expensive activity only under certain circumstances. Aberdeen Proving Ground is a military installation under the exclusive federal jurisdiction at which official business of the federal government is conducted, including military training, testing of weapon systems and other military equipment, and other official business.
( b ) On Aberdeen Proving Ground, except for activities authorized under 5 United States Code Chapter 71, Labor Management Relations, it is unlawful for any person to engage in any public displays of opinions made by protesting, picketing or any other similar demonstration without the approval of the Commander, U.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground. Therefore, unless prior approval has been obtained as outlined below in 32 CFR 552.214, it will be unlawful for any person on Aberdeen Proving Ground to: ( 1 ) Engage in protests, public speeches, marches, sit-ins, or demonstrations promoting a point of view.
( 2 ) Interrupt or disturb the testing and evaluating of weapon systems, or any training, formation, ceremony, class, court-martial, hearing, or other military business.
( 3 ) Obstruct movement on any street, road, sidewalk, pathway, or other vehicle or pedestrian thoroughfare.
( 4 ) Utter to any person abusive, insulting, profane, indecent, or otherwise provocative language that by its very utterance tends to excite a breach of the peace.
( 5 ) Distribute or post publications, including pamphlets, newspapers, magazines, handbills, flyers, leaflets, and other printed materials, except through regularly established and approved distribution outlets and places.
( 6 ) Circulate petitions or engage in picketing or similar demonstrations for any purpose.
( 7 ) Engage in partisan political campaigning or electioneering.
( 8 ) Disobey a request from Department of Defense police, other government law enforcement officials (e.g., Federal, State, or local law enforcement officials), military police, or other competent authority to disperse, move along or leave the installation.
( c ) In appropriate cases, the Commander, U.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground may give express written permission for protests, picketing, or any other similar demonstrations on Aberdeen Proving Ground property outside the gates adjacent to the installation borders, only if the procedures outlined below in 32 CFR 552.214 are followed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 14, 2014

NO. 03-13-00445-CR

Stephen Hollar, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 14, 2014

NO. 03-13-00446-CR

Stephen Hollar, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
### §22. Research and information programs; reports to Congress

(a) The Commission shall establish and maintain, as part of its ongoing operations, research and information programs to (1) determine the feasibility of trading by computer, and the expanded use of modern information system technology, electronic data processing, and modern communication systems by commodity exchanges, boards of trade, and by the Commission itself for purposes of improving, strengthening, facilitating, or regulating futures trading operations; (2) assist in the development of educational and other informational materials regarding futures trading for dissemination and use among producers, market users, and the general public; and (3) carry out the general purposes of this chapter.

(b) The Commission shall include in its annual reports to Congress plans and findings with respect to implementing this section.

(Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §18, as added Pub. L. 93–463, title IV, §416, Oct. 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 1415.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of section, see section 418 of Pub. L. 93–463, set out as an Effective Date of 1974 Amendment note under section 2 of this title.
§ 283.4 Policy. It is DoD policy that: ( a ) The officials designated in this part exercise waiver authority that, by statute or delegation, is vested in the Department of Defense.
( b ) Waiver applications shall be processed in accordance with all pertinent statutes and regulations, and after consideration of other relevant authorities.
§ 536.116 Responsibilities as to claims arising overseas under international agreements. ( a ) Command claims services or other responsible JA offices within whose jurisdiction SOFA or other treaty provisions provide for a claim reimbursement system, and where DA has been assigned single-service responsibility for the foreign country seeking reimbursement (see § 536.17) are responsible for: ( 1 ) Establishing programs for verifying, certifying, and reimbursing claims payments. Such service or JA office will provide a copy of its procedures implementing the program to the Commander USARCS.
( 2 ) Providing the Commander USARCS with budget estimates for reimbursements in addition to the reports required by AR 27-20, paragraph 13-7.
( 3 ) Providing the Commander USARCS each month in which payments are made, with statistical information on the number of individual claims reimbursed, the total amount paid by the foreign government, and the total amount reimbursed by the United States.
( 4 ) Providing the Commander USARCS with a quarterly report showing total reimbursements paid during the quarter for maneuver damage and tort claims classified according to major categories of damage determined by the Commander USARCS, and an update on major issues or activities that could affect the reimbursement system's operation or funding.
( b ) Command claims services or other responsible Army JA offices will ensure that all claims personnel within their areas of responsibility: ( 1 ) Receive annual training on the receiving State's claims procedures, including applicable time limitations, procedures and the responsible receiving State claims offices' locations.
( 2 ) Screen all new claims and inquiries about claims to identify those claimants who must file with the receiving State.
( 3 ) Ensure that all such claimants are informed of this requirement and the applicable time limitation.
( 4 ) Ensure that all applicable SOFA claims based on incidents occurring in circumstances that bring them within the United States' primary sending State jurisdiction are fully investigated.
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.115 Next of kin.

The person or persons in the highest category of priority as determined by the following list (categories appear in descending order of priority): Surviving legal spouse; children (whether by current or prior marriage) age 18 years or older in descending precedence by age; father or mother, unless by court order custody has been vested in another (adoptive parent takes precedence over natural parent); siblings (whole or half) age 18 years or older in descending precedence by age; grandfather or grandmother; any other relative (precedence to be determined in accordance with the civil law of descent of the deceased former member's state of domicile at time of death).
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Quality Custom Medical Supply, Inc., as Assignee of Ranisha McMeo, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>American Country Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Darya Klein of counsel), for appellant.Rossillo &amp; Licata, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered December 7, 2016, deemed from a judgment of that court entered March 13, 2017 (see CPLR 5501 [c]). The judgment, entered pursuant to the December 7, 2016 order, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground of lack of medical necessity. By order entered December 7, 2016, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion. This appeal by plaintiff ensued. A judgment was subsequently entered on March 13, 2017, from which the appeal is deemed to have been taken (<i>see </i>CPLR 5501 [c]).</p><p>Contrary to plaintiff's contention, defendant's proof was sufficient to give rise to a presumption that the denial of claim form had been properly mailed (<i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]). In addition, the peer review report submitted by defendant sufficiently set forth a factual basis and medical rationale for the peer reviewer's determination that there was a lack of medical necessity for the supplies at issue and plaintiff failed to submit any medical evidence to rebut the conclusions set forth in the peer review report. Plaintiff's remaining contentions lack merit.</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur. </p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>July 12, 2019<br>Decision Date: July 12, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**Exhibit 32.A****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending September 30, 2005, of El PasoNatural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, James J. Cleary, President, certify(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ James J. Cleary           James J. Cleary *Chairman of the Board and President* *(Principal Executive Officer)*      November 4, 2005A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to El Paso Natural GasCompany and will be retained by El Paso Natural Gas Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
### Schlemmer, Kevin (OST)
From: Sent: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Friday, March 01,20131:43 PM To: Cc: Subject: Mike Olson (mike@flygrandisland.com); 'mayor@grand-island.com' Devany, Dennis (OST); Hooyerink, Brett; Bob@Sovereignairinc.com EAS proposals for Grand Island, NE Attachments: American Airlines proposal for GRI.pdf; Sovereign proposal for GRI.pdf

Iwould like to updateyou on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Grand Island, and give you an opportunityto offerany comments on the record before we submit a recommendation tothe Assistant SecretaryforAviation and International Affairs. We issued Order 

### 2013-1-17, January 

### 25, 2013, requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EAS for 

### a newterm. In response to our request, we received two proposals, one from American Airlines, the incumbent, and one from Sovereign Air, Inc.
I have attached both proposals foryour review. Iexpectthe proposals to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov by late afternoon. I request thatyou review the proposals and submit any commentsyou may have as soon as possible, but no laterthan Thursday, March 21. Please send yourcomments directlyto me via e-mail at kevin.schlemmer@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all relevant partiesthat I have not included on this email.
Ifyou have any questions, feel free to contact me. Regards,
United States Department ofTransportation EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, 

### X-53 1200 NewJersey Ave. SE Washington, DC 

### 20590 202-366-3176 phone 

### 202-366-7638 fax

1
### §251. Conditions for delivery of agricultural products

#### (a) Prompt delivery

In the absence of a lawful excuse, a warehouse operator shall, without unnecessary delay, deliver the agricultural product stored or handled in the warehouse on a demand made by—

(1) the holder of the receipt for the agricultural product; or

(2) the person that deposited the product, if no receipt has been issued.

#### (b) Payment to accompany demand

Prior to delivery of the agricultural product, payment of the accrued charges associated with the storage of the agricultural product, including satisfaction of the warehouseman's lien, shall be made if requested by the warehouse operator.

#### (c) Surrender of receipt

When the holder of a receipt requests delivery of an agricultural product covered by the receipt, the holder shall surrender the receipt to the warehouse operator, in the manner prescribed by the Secretary, to obtain the agricultural product.

#### (d) Cancellation of receipt

A warehouse operator shall cancel each receipt returned to the warehouse operator upon the delivery of the agricultural product for which the receipt was issued.

(Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, §12, as added Pub. L. 106–472, title II, §201, Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2067.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 251, acts Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, §10, 39 Stat. 487; Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 366, §5, 46 Stat. 1464; Pub. L. 97–35, title I, §158(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 375, authorized fee for warehouse examination, inspection, and licensing, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–472. See section 243 of this title.

A prior section 12 of act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, was classified to section 253 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–472.
### [§6309. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–183, §2(26), Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1058]

Section, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 521, related to authorized leave of absence of a rural postal carrier which occurred at beginning, during, or at end of a period of annual or sick leave.
#### RANGER, Respondent, v. THALMANN et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 16, 1903.)

Action by Solomon Ranger against Ernst Thalmann and others.

No opinion. Motion granted.
May 14, 1998

MESSAGE TO INTERNET USERS:

No. 97-2915 Weiss v. School Board of Hillsborough

The above opinion that issued on May 13, 1998 had an Appendix which will not be available on

line until a later date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          24,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,470
<INVENTORY>                                      4,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,573
<PP&E>                                           7,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,204
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           117
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,158
<SALES>                                         32,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,319
<CGS>                                           13,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   543
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (50)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        12
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (62)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (62)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>