alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 101—AGRICULTURAL PROMOTION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—COMMODITY PROMOTION AND EVALUATION

Sec.
7401.
Commodity promotion and evaluation.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—ISSUANCE OF ORDERS FOR PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION ACTIVITIES REGARDING AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES

7411.
Findings and purpose.
7412.
Definitions.
7413.
Issuance of orders.
7414.
Required terms in orders.
7415.
Permissive terms in orders.
7416.
Assessments.
7416a.
Confirmation of authority of Secretary of Agriculture to collect State commodity assessments.
7417.
Referenda.
7418.
Petition and review of orders.
7419.
Enforcement.
7420.
Investigations and power to subpoena.
7421.
Suspension or termination.
7422.
Amendments to orders.
7423.
Effect on other laws.
7424.
Regulations.
7425.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—CANOLA AND RAPESEED

7441.
Findings and declaration of policy.
7442.
Definitions.
7443.
Issuance and amendment of orders.
7444.
Required terms in orders.
7445.
Assessments.
7446.
Referenda.
7447.
Petition and review.
7448.
Enforcement.
7449.
Investigations and power to subpoena.
7450.
Suspension or termination.
7451.
Regulations.
7452.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—KIWIFRUIT

7461.
Findings and purposes.
7462.
Definitions.
7463.
Issuance of orders.
7464.
National Kiwifruit Board.
7465.
Required terms in order.
7466.
Permissive terms in order.
7467.
Petition and review.
7468.
Enforcement.
7469.
Investigations and power to subpoena.
7470.
Referenda.
7471.
Suspension or termination.
7472.
Regulations.
7473.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—POPCORN

7481.
Findings and declaration of policy.
7482.
Definitions.
7483.
Issuance of orders.
7484.
Required terms in orders.
7485.
Referenda.
7486.
Petition and review.
7487.
Enforcement.
7488.
Investigations and power to subpoena.
7489.
Relation to other programs.
7490.
Regulations.
7491.
Authorization of appropriations.
§ 552.215 Responsibilities. ( a ) Director, Law Enforcement and Security, U.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground, will furnish police support as needed.
( b ) Chief Counsel and Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, will provide a legal review of the request.
|   | Exhibit 32 |
|--------|------------|

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Mark D. Morelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Sanjeev Kumar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley* Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that based on his knowledge:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) 

     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, 

     the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|   |
|--------|
#### Philip J. Donohue, Appellant, v. Sheila Frasca, Respondent.

In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 20, 1960, which: (1) grants defendant’s motion to strike out plaintiff’s original and amended notes of issue and statements of readiness; and (2) strikes the action from the Trial Calendar as premature. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs, and without prejudice to any motion defendant may be advised to make under paragraph (e) of subdivision (9) of the special rule of the Rules of the Appellate Division, Second Department, effective January 15, 1957, as amended. *1047In our opinion the papers submitted in support of the motion were insufficient to justify the relief granted. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
### §749. Comprehensive assessment system

#### (a) Establishment

The Administrator, in coordination with the National Council on Disability and the National Advisory Council, shall establish a comprehensive system to assess, on an ongoing basis, the Nation's prevention capabilities and overall preparedness, including operational readiness.

#### (b) Performance metrics and measures

The Administrator shall ensure that each component of the national preparedness system, National Incident Management System, National Response Plan, and other related plans and strategies, and the reports required under section 752 of this title is developed, revised, and updated with clear and quantifiable performance metrics, measures, and outcomes.

#### (c) Contents

The assessment system established under subsection (a) shall assess—

(1) compliance with the national preparedness system, National Incident Management System, National Response Plan, and other related plans and strategies;

(2) capability levels at the time of assessment against target capability levels defined pursuant to the guidelines established under section 746(a) of this title;

(3) resource needs to meet the desired target capability levels defined pursuant to the guidelines established under section 746(a) of this title; and

(4) performance of training, exercises, and operations.

(Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §649, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1428.)
#### PATH, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

Action by John Path against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and the denial of a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

H. A. Robinson (F. Angelo Gaynor and Bayard H. Ames, of counsel), for appellant.

Bennett & Silverman, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The verdict is attacked on the ground that it is against the weight of evidence. Upon a review of the whole case we can find no sufficient reason for disturbing it, especially as no motion was made for the direction of a verdict. The defendant’s exception to the admission of evidence does not present reversible error. Judgment and o.rder affirmed, with costs.
§ 634.20 Privately owned vehicle operation requirements. Personnel seeking to register their POVs on military installations within the United States or its territories and in overseas areas will comply with the following requirements. (Registration in overseas commands may be modified in accordance with international agreements or military necessity.) ( a ) Possess a valid state, overseas command, host nation or international drivers license (within appropriate classification), supported by DD Form 2, or other appropriate identification for DOD civilians, contractors and retirees. DA Form 1602, Civilian Identification Card, is limited for identification on Army installations only.
( b ) Possess a certificate of state registration as required by the state in which the vehicle is registered.
( c ) Comply with the minimum requirements of the automobile insurance laws or regulations of the state or host nation. In overseas commands where host nation laws do not require minimum personal injury and property damage liability insurance, the major overseas commander will set reasonable liability insurance requirements for registration and/or operation of POVs within the confines of military installations and areas where the commander exercises jurisdiction. Prior to implementation, insurance requirements in host states or nations should be formally coordinated with the appropriate host agency.
( d ) Satisfactorily complete a safety and mechanical vehicle inspection by the state or jurisdiction in which the vehicle is licensed. If neither state nor local jurisdiction requires a periodic safety inspection, installation commanders may require and conduct an annual POV safety inspection; however, inspection facilities must be reasonably accessible to those requiring use. Inspections will meet minimum standards established by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in 49 CFR 570.1 through 570.10. Lights, turn signals, brake lights, horn, wipers, and pollution control devices and standards in areas where applicable, should be included in the inspection. Vehicles modified from factory standards and determined unsafe may be denied access and registration.
( e ) Possess current proof of compliance with local vehicle emission inspection if required by the state, and maintenance requirements.
( f ) Vehicles with elevated front or rear ends that have been modified in a mechanically unsafe manner are unsafe and will be denied registration. 49 CFR 570.8 states that springs shall not be extended above the vehicle manufacturer's design height.
**Exhibit (32)(b)**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Empire District Electric Company(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Gregory A. Knapp, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **By**                                                       | **/s/  Gregory A. Knapp** |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
| Name:  Gregory A. Knapp                                      |                      |
| Title:  Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer |                      |

 

Date:   November 6,2009

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to The Empire District ElectricCompany and will be retained by The Empire District Electric Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
(June 6, 1963)

#### Emanuel Shemin, Appellant, v. A. Black *&*Company, Inc., Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff sues for damages resulting from breach of an alleged oral agreement under which defendant, a commission broker, agreed to sell and falsely represented that it had sold 10,000 holly plants on behalf of plaintiff. Pursuant to notice given a month earlier, defendant was permitted to amend its answer and plead, among other things, a second separate and affirmative defense asserting that for the purpose of influencing one Wheeler, defendant’s agent, to make the agreement .alleged in the complaint, plaintiff gave or agreed to give Wheeler the sum of $200, without defendant’s knowledge *597or consent. If such a corrupt arrangement were established upon trial it would constitute a violation of section 439 of the Penal Law.

The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that plaintiff had promised a *“*benefit ” to Wheeler and later given Mm $200 to influence Ms conduct, in violation of section 439; and on the basis of such findmg held the agreement void and unenforcible and directed judgment for defendant.

Neither party took the pains to attempt to prove or disprove the claim of commercial bribery with the clarity and definiteness that a charge of this character requires; and as a result the evidence relied upon by the trial court to sustain this defense was far from satisfactory. Some of us believe that, on *the*present state of the record, the finding by the trial court of the corrupt arrangement is against the weight of the credible evidence. The penal statute upon which it is based must be strictly construed (57 C. J. S., Master and Servant, p. 443, § 639). A new trial of the issues raised by the second defense is therefore indicated.

In view of the preoccupation of the panties with this defense it would appear that the evidence concerning the terms of the agreement to sell, the scope of Wheeler’s employment and the measure of damages could also be developed more fully and satisfactorily. Some of the court consider the findmg that there was such an agreement as against the weight of the credible evidence.

Accordingly, judgment filed February 23, 1962 granting judgment against plaintiff on the merits should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

BoteM, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ., concur.

Judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, upon the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.
#### In the Matter of Carmelo Trapani, Petitioner, v Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, dated October 14,1977, which, after a hearing, revoked petitioner’s registration as a longshoreman. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination was supported by substantial evidence and the penalty of revocation is not shocking to one’s conscience (see *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). We have considered petitioner’s remaining argument and find no merit in it. Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                              Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


































<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit 23.1




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Hurco Companies, Inc.
Indianapolis, Indiana



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
Hurco  Companies,  Inc.  on Form S-8  (File No.  2-71597)  of our  report  dated
December  10, 1993 on our audit of the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
financial  statement  schedule  of Hurco  Companies,  Inc.,  for the year  ended
October 31, 1993, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





                                                       COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.




Indianapolis, Indiana
January 26, 1996
§ 2400.25 Access. ( a ) A person is eligible for access to classified information provided that a determination of trustworthiness has been made by agency heads or designated officials and provided that such access is essential to the accomplishment of lawful and authorized Government purposes. A personnel security clearance is an indication that the trustworthiness decision has been made. Procedures shall be established by the head of each office to prevent access to classified information before a personnel security clearance has been granted. The number of people cleared and granted access to classified information shall be maintained at the minimum number that is consistent with operational requirements and needs. No one has a right to have access to classified information solely by virtue of rank or position. The final responsibility for determinating whether an individual's official duties require possession of or access to any element or item of classified information, and whether the individual has been granted the appropriate security clearance by proper authority, rests with the individual who has authorized possession, knowledge, or control of the information and not with the prospective recipient. These principles are equally applicable if the prospective recipient is an organizational entity, other Federal agencies, contractors, foreign governments, and others.
( b ) When access to a specific classification category is no longer required for the performance of an individual's assigned duties, the security clearance will be administratively adjusted, without prejudice to the individual, to the classification category, if any, required.
( c ) The Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy may create special access programs to control access, distribution, and protection of particularly sensitive information classified pursuant to Executive Order 12356 or predecessor orders if: ( 1 ) Normal management and safeguarding procedures do not limit access sufficiently;
( 2 ) The number of persons with access is limited to the minimum necessary to meet the objective of providing extra protection for the information;
( 3 ) The special access program is established in writing; and
( 4 ) A system of accounting for the program is established and maintained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1301 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1301

 Expressing support for the inaugural Heart Recovery Awareness Day on 
                           February 20, 2025.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2024

 Mr. Moulton submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for the inaugural Heart Recovery Awareness Day on 
                           February 20, 2025.

Whereas cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death both globally and 
        in the United States;
Whereas one-third of all global deaths in 2021 were caused by a cardiovascular 
        condition;
Whereas cardiovascular disease accounted for 12 percent of total United States 
        health expenditures from 2018-2019;
Whereas heart recovery, which preserves the native heart, is a burgeoning field 
        of medicine;
Whereas heart recovery will positively impact Medicare resources through reduced 
        hospital expenditures, reduced length of hospital stays, and fewer 
        repeat hospital visits;
Whereas heart recovery is increasingly helping patients live longer and fuller 
        lives with their native hearts intact; and
Whereas February 20, 2025, is designated to observe Heart Recovery Awareness 
        Day:
Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports--
            (1) the goals of Heart Recovery Awareness Day;
            (2) increasing awareness of innovative treatments available 
        to patients with cardiovascular disease;
            (3) improving outcomes and quality of life for patients 
        with heart failure; and
            (4) expanding access to treatments that change the standard 
        of care for heart failure, such that all Americans regardless 
        of age, gender, or geography can have an opportunity to 
        preserve their native heart.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1
EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Randall W. White certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EducationalDevelopment Corporation. 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period endedAugust 31, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants internal control over financialreporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.       Date October 15, 2004 By   /s/ Randall W. White         Randall W. White
#### § 757.20 Receipt and release.

The JAG designee will execute and deliver appropriate releases to third parties who have made full or agreed upon compromised payments. A copy of the release will be kept in the claims file.

[72 FR 53430, Sept. 19, 2007]