alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUERPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the month of February 2006(Commission File No. 1-14728)

Lan Airlines S.A.

(Translation of registrant's name in English)Avenida Americo Vespucio Sur 901Renca,Santiago, Chile(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual 
  reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.)

Form 20-FXForm 40-F _____

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the 
  information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the
  information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)

Yes __ NoX

---





[Lan Airlines Letterhead]



MATERIAL FACT



Santiago, February 14, 2006



Mr. Alejandro Ferreiro Y.

Superintendent of Securities and Insurance

Present



Re:Material Fact



To whom it may concern:



In compliance with Article 9 and the second paragraph of Article 10 of Law 18.045, we hereby inform you of the following relevant facts:





---







On February 14, 2006 personnel from the government of the United States of America presented itself at the offices of our subsidiary LAN Cargo S.A. in Miami requiring information as part of an alleged antitrust investigation which apparently includes various European, American and Asian cargo airlines.



LAN Cargo S.A. fully cooperated in permitting the authorities directing the investigations to obtain the information required. This request is part of preliminary investigation and no charges have been made.



LAN Cargo S.A. and its affiliates continue operating normally.



Sincerely,



Ignacio Cueto Plaza

President

Lan Airlines S.A.





| | CC: | Bolsa de Comercio de Santiago  
| | --- | -------------------------------
| |     | Bolsa de Comercio de Valparaíso
| |     | Bolsa Electrónica de Chile     







---





SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: February 15, 2006





| | Lan Airlines S.A.                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Ignacio Cueto PlazaBy: Ignacio Cueto PlazaTitle: President
#### In the Matter of Dakym T., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 321]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Lubow, J.), dated June 6, 2006, which, upon so much of a fact-finding order of the same court dated April 11, 2006, made after a hearing, as found that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, less the time spent in detention pending disposition. The appeal brings up for review so much of the fact-finding order dated April 11, 2006, as concerned the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*868Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court had subject matter jurisdiction. Moreover, the nonhearsay allegations of the petition and supporting depositions established every element of the charged crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree *(see Matter of Jermaine G.,*38 AD3d 105 [2007]; *cf. Matter of Jamel E.,*33 AD3d 797, 798 [2006]).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see Matter of Shaquana S.,*9 AD3d 466, 467 [2004]; *Matter of James B.,*262 AD2d 480, 481 [1999]; *cf. People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the appellant committed acts, which if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree. The appellant’s unauthorized use of the vehicle in question can be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the incident *(see People v Borrero,*26 NY2d 430, 435 [1970]; *People v Lydon,*33 AD3d 335, 336 [2006]; *Matter of Basille N.,*228 AD2d 323, 325 [1996]; *People v Malik,*221 AD2d 567, 567-568 [1995]; *Matter of Aaron H.,*206 AD2d 426, 427 [1994]). The appellant failed to rebut the presumption of unauthorized use *(see*Penal Law § 165.05 [1]; *People v Simmons,*32 NY2d 250, 252 [1973]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power *(cf.*CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the determination was not against the weight of the evidence *(see Matter of Lenford C.,*35 AD3d 462 [2006]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Billy L. Tedlock, Appellant, against Norma J. Jackson, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from order of Erie Trial Term dismissing the writ of habeas corpus seeking to enforce a custody provision of a Texas decree and directing that the infant remain in the custody of Norma June Jackson.) Present ■ — ■ Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000315708
<NAME> BANK CORPORATION OF GEORGIA

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      20,595,724
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      18,642,250
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,210,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 42,828,598
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,088,719
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,074,850
<LOANS>                                    190,169,408
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,849,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             290,254,322
<DEPOSITS>                                 258,698,433
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,333,327
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,284,864
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,437,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             296,254,122
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             20,526,340
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,139,919
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               768,603
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            24,434,862
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           9,526,209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,877,915
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       14,556,947
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  409,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (1,497)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             12,698,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,471,299
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   4,471,299
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,312,690
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.76
<LOANS-NON>                                    499,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   225,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,652,412
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  360,534
<RECOVERIES>                                   198,462
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,849,340
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,849,340
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 151 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 

in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2023 

Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Small Business in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $7,500,000 for the One Hundred Eight9 eenth Congress. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 151 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $3,750,000 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2023, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

7 (2) not more than $3,750,000 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2024, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2025. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7336

RONNIE PERRY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:20

- hc

- 02028

- FL )

Submitted : February 18 , 2021 Decided: February 23, 2021

Before NIEMEYER , KING , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ronnie Perry , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie Perry seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing with out prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as an unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition

. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealabilit y will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Perry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appe al. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 174 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2023 

Mrs. RODGERS of Washington submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce in the One Hundred Eighteenth 

Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 

4 Commerce (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $27,696,649 for the One Hundred 

9 Eighteenth Congress. 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 174 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $13,752,741 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2023, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

7 (2) not more than $13,949,908 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2024, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2025. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 10-2262

ASHLEIGH PRUELL, on behalf of herself and all other employees

similarly situated; AMY GORDON, on behalf of herself and all other

employees similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

CARITAS CHRISTI; CARITAS CHRISTI NETWORK SERVICES; CARITAS GOOD

SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.; CARITAS NORWOOD HOSPITAL, INC.;

CARITAS SOUTHWOOD HOSPITAL, INC.; CARITAS ST. JOHN OF GOD HOSPITAL,

INC.; SAINT ANNE'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION; RALPH DE LA TORRE, M.D.;

RICHARD KROPP; CARITAS CARNEY HOSPITAL, INC.; CARITAS HOLY FAMILY

HOSPITAL, INC.; CARITAS ST. ELIZABETH'S MEDICAL CENTER OF BOSTON,

INC.,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on July 14, 2011, should be

amended as follows.

On page 3, line 4 of 2nd full paragraph, insert a comma after

"law".

On page 9, line 3 down from top of page, replace "Fleabite" with

"Flibotte".
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2932

___________________________

Christina L. Eaton

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kilolo Kijakazi,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

 ____________

 Submitted: July 20, 2021

Filed: July 23, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

1Kilolo Kijakazi has been appointed to serve as Acting Commissioner of Social

Security, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c).
Christina Eaton appeals the district court’s2

 order affirming the denial of

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We agree with the

court that substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the adverse decision. 

See Twyford v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 929 F.3d 512, 516 (8th Cir. 2019) (de

novo review of district court’s judgment; this court will affirm unless Commissioner’s

findings are unsupported by substantial evidence or result from legal error). 

Specifically, we conclude the record supports the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s)

finding that Eaton’s impairments did not meet the mental disorder listings, see id. at

517 (ALJ’s finding that listing was not met was supported by treatment notes and

claimant’s daily activities); and the ALJ’s determination of Eaton’s residual

functional capacity (RFC), see Wildman v. Astrue, 596 F.3d 959, 969 (8th Cir. 2010)

(ALJ did not err in failing to include limitation in RFC, as he determined that

claimant’s allegations about such limitation were not credible). We find no merit to

Eaton’s argument that the ALJ erred by failing to recontact the medical expert after

the hearing. See Onstad v. Shalala, 999 F.2d 1232, 1234 (8th Cir. 1993) (reversal due

to failure to develop record is only warranted where such failure is unfair or

prejudicial; no prejudice where claimant did not show that evidence ALJ failed to

obtain would have made difference in case).

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

2The Honorable John T. Maughmer, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 2

- NM

- 141

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0272

_________________

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONTANA

and PAUL FREDERICK HENKE, M.D., on

behalf of themselves and their patients,

 Plaintiffs and Appellees,

 v.

STATE OF MONTANA and AUSTIN 

KNUDSEN, Attorney General of the State of 

Montana, in his official capacity, and his agents 

and successors,

 Defendants and Appellants.

O R D E R

_________________

Nicole Saharsky, of Washington, DC, has submitted an application to appear pro 

hac vice before this Court in the above-entitled cause.

The application demonstrates that Petitioner Saharsky is currently in good standing 

with another state jurisdiction in which Saharsky is admitted to the practice of law, 

Montana counsel listed in the application is in good standing with the State Bar of Montana,

and this is the first appearance of Petitioner. According to the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, however, this would be the fourth appearance of Petitioner’s firm before 

this Court. Rule VI(C) of our Rules for Admission to the Bar of Montana requires a 

showing of good cause before an attorney or firm may be granted leave to appear pro hac 

vice in more than two actions or proceedings. Pending consideration of a renewed 

application with a statement of good cause,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application of Nicole Saharsky to appear pro

hac vice in the above-entitled cause is DENIED without prejudice.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Nichole Saharsky, to all 

counsel of record in this appeal, and to the State Bar of Montana.

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 18 2023

12/18/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0272
§ 634.17 Extensions of suspensions and revocations. ( a ) Driving in violation of a suspension or revocation imposed under this part will result in the original period of suspension or revocation being increased by 2 years. In addition, administrative action may be initiated based on the commission of any traffic, criminal, or military offenses, for example, active duty military personnel driving on the installation in violation of a lawful order.
( b ) For each subsequent determination within a 5-year period that revocation is authorized under § 634.9, military personnel, DOD civilians, contractors and NAF employees will be prohibited from obtaining or using an OF 346 for 6 months for each such incident. A determination whether DOD civilian personnel should be prohibited from obtaining or using an OF 346 will be made in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable to civilian personnel. This does not preclude a commander from imposing such prohibition for a first offense, or for a longer period of time for a first or subsequent offense, or for such other reasons as may be authorized.
( c ) Commanders may extend a suspension or revocation of driving privileges on personnel until completion of an approved remedial driver training course or alcohol or drug counseling programs after proof is provided.
( d ) Commanders may extend a suspension or revocation of driving privileges on civilian personnel convicted of intoxicated driving on the installation until successful completion of a state or installation approved alcohol or drug rehabilitation program.
( e ) For Navy personnel for good cause, the appropriate authority may withdraw the restricted driving privilege and continue the suspension or revocation period (for example, driver at fault in the traffic accident, or driver cited for a moving violation.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1475 

Expressing support for the designation of September 2024 as ‘‘Peace Month’’ 

and calling on Congress to take action to promote peace. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 

Ms. NORTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of September 2024 

as ‘‘Peace Month’’ and calling on Congress to take action 

to promote peace. 

Whereas the United Nations designated September 21 

‘‘International Day of Peace’’, otherwise known as Peace 

Day; 

Whereas the United Nations General Assembly declared 

Peace Day as a day devoted to ‘‘commemorating and 

strengthening the ideals of peace, both within and among 

all nations and peoples’’; 

Whereas all United Nations member states, organizations, regional and nongovernmental organizations, and individuals are encouraged to celebrate and recognize global 

peace efforts on Peace Day; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1475 IH 

Whereas Peace Day represents shared hopes of an end to 

conflict in all forms; 

Whereas the United Nations calls for a 24-hour global cease 

fire on Peace Day; 

Whereas this year’s Peace Day theme is ‘‘Cultivating a Culture of Peace’’; 

Whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a 

milestone development in contemporary human history 

promoting peace and well-being worldwide; 

Whereas global peace promotion efforts improve the lives of 

Americans and all peoples; 

Whereas the United States has a long history of promoting 

peace and human rights at home and abroad; and 

Whereas September would be an appropriate month to designate as Peace Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Peace Month’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) calls on Congress to promote peace, both at 

5 home and abroad. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS