alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, D.C 2020

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Designated Agency Ethics Official

Deputy Agency Ethics Officials

THROUGH: The General Counsel 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act (DEOA), 20 U.S.C. Section 3472, Public Law 96-88, I hereby 

delegate to you the authority to serve as "agency designees" for the purposes of 5 

C.F.R. Sections 2635.403(b), 2635.502(a), (c), (d), and (e), 2635.605(b), and 

2635.606(b). Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, 

amendments to the authority delegated herein are included within the scope of this 

delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be further redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegation Control Officer.

 /s/ 
 Richard W. Riley

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 4/27/93

Certified Date: 5/10/93

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Wilma J. Hodo

Control No. EG/EGB/61
### §1421c. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1011(c), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 709

Section, Pub. L. 101–624, title XXV, §2513, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4074, directed Secretary of Agriculture to develop system for informing consumers of farm value of agricultural products and to submit annual reports on such information to Congress.
### **CHAPTER 29—POTATO ACT OF 1935**
H. Res. 1291 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 12, 2024. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Kennedy. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 541.

#### United States et al. *v.*Alaska Steamship Company et al.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Argued December 16, 17, 1919.

Order entered March 22, 1920.

[See 253 U. S. 113.]

Counsel requested to file briefs concerning the effect upon the issues herein involved resulting from the act of Congress terminating the federal control of railroads and amending the act to regulate commerce in certain particulars, approved February 28, 1920.
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

TO: Executive Director of the White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, 

Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Authority to Designate a Department Employee to Serve as the Designated Federal 

Officer for the Presidential Advisory Commission on Advancing Educational 

Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans 

I. DELEGATION

By the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 

U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you, or anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or 

delegated to perform the functions and duties of your position, the authority to designate a 

Department employee to serve as and carry out the duties of the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) 

for the Presidential Advisory Commission on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and 

Economic Opportunity for Black Americans, as set forth in 41 C.F.R. §§ 102-3.25 (definition of 

the term “Designated Federal Officer”), 102-3.105(i), and 102-3.120 and Sections 1009(e) and (f) 

of 5 U.S.C. Chapter 10 (Federal Advisory Committees). 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the existing authorities 

delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

None. 

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to the requirements of law, you may redelegate any of the authority delegated to you in 

this delegation and authorize further redelegation. Any redelegation must be done in accordance 

with the Administrative Communications System directive, ACSD-OFO-015, Delegation of 

Authority, dated August 26, 2016. 

IV. IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE 

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control 

Officer. I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification.

____________/s__________ 

Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D. 
OGC Clearance: /s/ Lauren Friedrich, 02/08/2023

Certified Date: 2/15/23

Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EA/EA4/197
#### In the Matter of Prom Handbag Co., Inc. R. Lewis Townsend, Appellant; Earl G. Haldeman, Doing Business as Harry Doelling Associates, Respondent.

In a general assignment for creditors, made pursuant to article 2 of the Debtor and Creditor Law, the assignee appeals from an order of the County Court, Orange County, dated July 12, 1960, denying his application to have the court confer immunity upon a witness (the respondent) pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 16 of the Debtor and Creditor Law. Order affirmed, without costs. Under all the circumstances disclosed by this record we are unable to say that the County Judge abused his discretion in denying the application. It was for him to determine on the evidence presented whether *526the witness should be granted immunity from prosecution, as permitted by the statute (Debtor and Creditor Law, § 16, subd. 2). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., not voting.
EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, W. Curtis Fossett, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Educational Development Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s quarterly periodended November 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: January 13, 2006/s/ W. Curtis Fossett
# 

TO:Chief Enforcement Officer 

Federal Student Aid

FROM:The Chief Operating Officer

Federal Student Aid

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

## I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me by the Secretary through delegation number EA/EN/59, certified on May 29, 2008, I hereby delegate to you, to your successor in function, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of your position, the authority under Section 490A of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), for issuance of subpoenas for the production of documentary evidence pertaining to the participation in any program under title IV of the Higher Education Act.  

## II. RESERVATIONS 

Exercise of this authority is subject to concurrence from the Office of the General Counsel.

## III. REDELEGATION

Subject to applicable provisions of law, you may re-delegate this authority.  Any re-delegations must be prepared in accordance with the Administrative Communications Systems directive, OM:1-102, Delegations of Authority.

## IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Delegations Control Officer.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of certification.

Signed by James W. Runcie

OGC clearance and date:  Debbie Friendly, 12/1/16

Certified Date:  12/2/16

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  Jim Clemmens

Control Number:  EN1/ENE/82
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 2.6

This Letter sets out the general terms and conditions under which Arena
Power, L.P., ("Arena") and Potomac Energy Corporation, ("Potomac"),
collectively the Parties, ("Parties"), will jointly participate in the
development, exploitation, ownership, and operation of a coal deposit and a
coal-fired electric power production plant which will be located near
Guaduero in the Emerald Mountain Region northwest of Bogota, Columbia, the
Project ("Project").

     As required, an ownership entity will be formed in Columbia, presumably
     under an S.A. or S.A. de C.V. structure. The entity will be called
     NEWCO, S.A. or NEWCO S.A. de C.V. ("Newco").

     Newco will be owned by Arena and Potomac who will each own one-half
     (1/2) of the stock of the entity and contribute required equity and/or
     guarantees in proportion to their ownership. If Newco enters any
     agreement to provide any local partners or equity/debt providers with
     equity, then dilution of Arena and Potomac will occur on an equal basis.

     Arena will be responsible for day to day management of Newco. Newco's
     board will have a minimum of four seats which will be held by Arena and
     Potomac. The board of Newco will adopt a resolution containing a list of
     management functions and business activities that will require unanimous
     consent of the Arena and Potomac directors.

     Arena and Potomac will equally share development costs of the Project
     once their capital accounts have equalized. To date, Potomac has
     incurred project development costs of $30,000. Arena will fund 100% of
     the next $30,000 in development costs to equalize its capital account
     with Potomac's. Thereafter, Arena and Potomac will each be responsible
     for one-half of the development costs of the Project.

     If a Project Development Fee is included in long term project debt
     financing, this development fee will be split equally among Arena and
     Potomac to offset each groups development costs.

     The Basic Contract for Small Carbon Exploration/Exploitation between
     Ecocarbon and Erasmo Potomac, will be formally assigned to Newco within
     60 days of Newco's formation.



     This Memorandum of Understanding is binding on Arena and Potomac.

This Agreement is dated effective December 2, 1998.



/s/Daniel P. Werner                                  /s/Carl Swan
Daniel P. Werner                                     Carl Swan
Vice President,                                      Potomac Energy Corporation
Arena Power Company, General Partner of
Arena Power, L.P.




                                       30
### **CHAPTER 45—SOIL BANK PROGRAM**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
1801 to 1816. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—ACREAGE RESERVE PROGRAM

1821 to 1824. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM

1831.
Repealed.
1831a.
Contract restrictions.
1832 to 1837. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—CROPLAND ADJUSTMENTS

1838.
Conversion of cropland into vegetative cover, water storage, wildlife and conservation uses; contracts with farmers.
NO. 12-14-00368- C R

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS § VS. § TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT § JOHN CALVIN MARSHALL § TYLER, TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: Now comes John Calvin Marshall , Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file appellant's brief, pursuant to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for good cause shows the following: 1. This case is on appeal from the 294th Judicial District Court of Van Zandt County, Texas. 2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. JOHN CALVIN
MARSHAL L , and numbered CR11-00070. 3. Appellant was convicted of Burglary of a Habitation with Intent to Commit Sexaul Assault. 4. Appellant was assessed a sentence of 25 years TCDJ-ID on October 3, 2014. 5. Notice of appeal was given on December 30, 2014. 6. The clerk's record was filed on January 30, 2015; the reporter's record was filed on March 2, 2014 and a supplement was filed on March 24, 2015. 7. The appellate brief is presently due on April 1, 2015. 8. Appellant requests an extension of time of 3 0 days from April 1 , 2015 9. No extension to file the brief has been received in this cause. ACCEPTED 12-14-00368-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 3/25/2015 5:25:56 PM CATHY LUSK CLERK10. Defendant is currently incarcerated.

11. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the requested extension: A supplement to the Reporter’s Record was filed with the Court of Appeals. The supplement is a volume of Appellant's Motion to Suppress presented to and ruled on by the trial court. Appellant will need to review the volume and determine if the denial of Appellant’s motion to suppress will be included as a point of error in his brief. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED , Appellant prays that this Court grant this Motion To Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, and for such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Dean White, Attorney at Law 690 West Dallas P.O. Box 155 Canton, Texas 75103 Tel: (903) 567-4155 Fax: (903) 567-4964

By: Dean White State Bar No. 21299500 Attorney for John Calvin Marshall /s/ Dean White Email: dwatty@etcable.netCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on March 2 5 , 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served on Chris Martin, Criminal District Attorney, Van Zandt County, 400 S. Buffalo, Canton, Texas 75103, by electronic service through the Electronic Filing Manager , to chrismartin@vanzandtcounty.org.

Dean White /s/ Dean White
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.701-3 Approved methods of grounding metallic frames, casings and other enclosures of electric equipment receiving power from direct current power systems with one polarity grounded. For the purpose of grounding metallic frames, casings and enclosures of any electric equipment or device-receiving power from a direct-current power system with one polarity grounded, the following methods of grounding will be approved: ( a ) A solid connection to the mine track;
( b ) A solid connection to the grounded power conductor of the system;
( c ) Silicon diode grounding; however, this method shall be employed only when such devices are installed in accordance with the requirements set forth in paragraph (d) of § 75.703-3; and
( d ) Any other method, approved by an authorized representative of the Secretary, which insures that there is no difference in potential between such metal enclosures and the earth.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

18 U.S.C. 1350
Certification of Bruce C. Dale                       President and Chief Executive
Officer                                        of
                           Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.

I, Bruce C. Dale,  President  and
Chief  Executive  Officer of  Duckwall-ALCO  Stores,  Inc.,  hereby  certify,  in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(a) |  | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,               2005, which
accompanies this certification, fully complies with               the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities               Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) |  | The
information contained the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for               the quarter
ended July 31, 2005, which accompanies this               certification, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the               financial condition and results of operation
of Duckwall-ALCO               Stores, Inc.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and
will be retained by Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: September
      12, 2005 |  | /s/
      Bruce C. Dale                                         
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                |  | Bruce C.
      Dale 
      President and Chief Executive Officer



| |  | 
| |  | 

---
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0639 Directorate Identifier: 2012

-NM

- 005

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Cond**  **ition Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 

### $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexi bility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
EXHIBIT 32.2
            Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant
                to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof, I, David O'Neil,
Principal  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.       The report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: February 13, 2006


                                       /s/ David O'Neil
                                       ---------------------------
                                       David O'Neil, Treasurer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer


                                       18
#### Richard L. Williams, complainant and appellee, v. Charles S. Williston, trustee, et al., defendants, on appeal of Alexander W. Marmor, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,290.

Foreclosure suit. Decree for complainant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Francis S. Wilson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Opinion filed March 3, 1925.

Rehearing denied March 16, 1925.

William Slack and Abram E. Adelman, for appellant.

Slottow & Leviton, for appellee; Charles Leviton, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Gridley delivered the opinion of the court.