alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>        5

<LEGEND>        THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS
                SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
                STATEMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL
                COMFORT PRODUCTS CORPORATION
                FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER
                31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
                ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                31,000
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         96,500
<ALLOWANCES>                           6,000
<INVENTORY>                           94,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     237,300
<PP&E>                               214,300
<DEPRECIATION>                       120,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       352,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                100,700
<BONDS>                              165,600
<COMMON>                             171,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                          (116,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         352,000
<SALES>                              630,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     630,700
<CGS>                                503,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        503,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      85,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    18,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       22,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   22,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          22,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.54


</TABLE>
### §1405. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

In addition to any funds otherwise available, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter for fiscal years 2009 through 2013.

#### (b) International agreements

Funds authorized to be appropriated under this chapter may be used for the implementation of projects described in the Declaration on Embracing Technology and Cooperation to Promote the Secure and Efficient Flow of People and Commerce across our Shared Border between the United States and Mexico, agreed to March 22, 2002, Monterrey, Mexico (commonly known as the Border Partnership Action Plan) or the Smart Border Declaration between the United States and Canada, agreed to December 12, 2001, Ottawa, Canada that are consistent with the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 110–161, div. E, title VI, §606, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2097.)
### §750. Remedial action management program

The Administrator, in coordination with the National Council on Disability and the National Advisory Council, shall establish a remedial action management program to—

(1) analyze training, exercises, and real-world events to identify and disseminate lessons learned and best practices;

(2) generate and disseminate, as appropriate, after action reports to participants in exercises and real-world events; and

(3) conduct remedial action tracking and long-term trend analysis.

(Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §650, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1428.)
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40583 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ANDRES GERARDO GONZALEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12

- CR

- 2016

- 1

Before DENNIS, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Andres Gerardo Gonzalez , federal prisoner # 28 490

- 379 , pleaded guilty
to possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine and was sentenced to 210 months of imprisonment . Gonzalez now moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion for a s entence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582( c ) (2)

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 12, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40583 Document: 00515307460 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2020No. 19

- 40583

2 Although it is not clear whether Gonzalez’s notice of appeal was timely, the time limit for filing a notice of appeal in a criminal case is not jurisdictional and may be waived. United States v. Martinez , 496 F.3d 387, 388

- 89 (5th Cir. 2007) . We therefore pretermit the issue whether his notice of appeal was timely filed. See id . at 389. By moving for leave to proceed IFP in this court, Gonzalez is challenging the district court’s ruling that the appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197 (5th Cir. 1997) ; United States v. Boutwell , 896 F.2d 884,
889

- 90 (5th Cir. 1990). In resolving Gonzalez ’s challenge, we confine our analysis of the issue of good faith to asking “whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and c itations omitted). Gonzalez fails to address the district court’s reasons for its denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion or his IFP motion. An issue must be briefed to be preserved. F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 28(a)(8). Gonzalez does not satisfy this requirement, as he does not state “the reasons he deserves

. . . relief” from the district court’s IFP ruling. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993);
see Boutwell , 896 F. 2 d at 8 90. Because Gonzalez has not shown that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appe al, his motion to appeal IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See Howard , 707 F.2d at 219

- 20; 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 19-40583 Document: 00515307460 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2020
### §2209j. Permanent debarment from participation in Department of Agriculture programs for fraud

#### (a) In general

Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Agriculture shall permanently debar an individual, organization, corporation, or other entity convicted of a felony for knowingly defrauding the United States in connection with any program administered by the Department of Agriculture from any subsequent participation in Department of Agriculture programs.

#### (b) Exceptions

#### (1) Secretary determination

The Secretary may reduce a debarment under subsection (a) to a period of not less than 10 years if the Secretary considers it appropriate.

#### (2) Food assistance

A debarment under subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to participation in domestic food assistance programs (as defined by the Secretary).

(Pub. L. 110–234, title XIV, §14211, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1464; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XIV, §14211, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2226.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.