alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1


I, Keith S. Walters, certify that:

1. I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ennis,
   Inc.;

2. Based  on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
   any  untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to  state  a
   material fact necessary to make the statements made, in  light
   of  the  circumstances under which such statements were  made,
   not  misleading  with respect to the period  covered  by  this
   quarterly report;

3. Based  on  my knowledge, the financial statements,  and  other
   financial  information  included  in  this  quarterly  report,
   fairly   present  in  all  material  respects  the   financial
   condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the
   registrant  as  of,  and for, the periods  presented  in  this
   quarterly report;

4. The   registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and   I   are
   responsible   for  establishing  and  maintaining   disclosure
   controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
   15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a)    Designed  such disclosure controls and procedures  to
      ensure   that   material  information   relating   to   the
      registrant,  including  its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
      made   known  to  us  by  others  within  those   entities,
      particularly  during  the period in  which  this  quarterly
      report is being prepared;

      b)     Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's
      disclosure  controls and procedures and presented  in  this
      report  our  conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of  the
      disclosure  controls and procedures, as of the end  of  the
      period  covered  by this report based on  such  evaluation;
      and

      c)     Disclosed   in  this  report  any  change   in   the
      registrant's  internal  control  over  financial  reporting
      that  occurred  during the registrant's most recent  fiscal
      quarter  (the  registrant's fourth fiscal  quarter  in  the
      case  of  the annual report) that has materially  affected,
      or   is   reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,   the
      registrant's  internal  control over  financial  reporting;
      and

5. The   registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I   have
   disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation,  to  the
   registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
   board  of  directors  (or  persons performing  the  equivalent
   function):

      a)     All  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design   or
      operation   of  internal  controls  over  which   financial
      reporting  is  reasonably likely to  adversely  affect  the
      registrant's  ability  to record,  process,  summarize  and
      report financial data; and

      b)    Any  fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves
      management  or other employees who have a significant  role
      in the registrant's internal controls.




/s/ Keith S. Walters

Keith S. Walters
Chief Executive Officer
June 23, 2004
Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.8 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, made as of the 27th day of June 2005, by and between COMMONWEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Virginia corporation (the “Employer”), and RICHARD J. FREER, PH.D. (the “Executive”).

 WHEREAS, the Employer and the Executive previously entered into a First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of
June 27, 2005 (the “Initial Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Initial Agreement contained an equation to determine
certain performance-based cash, restricted stock and incentive option bonuses; and 
 WHEREAS, the Employer and the Executive wish to
amend the Initial Agreement to correct a mathematical error contained therein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Employer and the Executive hereby amend the Initial Agreement as follows: 
 1. The equation contained in Section 4(c) is hereby removed in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “A + (A * (1-B)) = C” 
 2. The equation contained in Section 4(f)(i) is hereby removed in its entirety and replaced
with the following: 
 “5,000 + (5,000 * (1-A)) = B” 
 3. The equation contained in Section 4(f)(ii) is hereby removed in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “2,500 + (2,500 * (1 – A)) = B” 
 4. All other portions of the Initial Agreement remain in
effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed as a sealed instrument by the Employer, by
its duly authorized officer, and by the Executive, as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	 COMMONWEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Robert B. Harris, Ph.D.
	 Name:
	 	Robert B. Harris, Ph.D.
	 Title:
	 	Chief Executive Officer
		
	 Date:
	 	2/1/06
		
		 	/s/ Richard J. Freer, Ph.D.
		 	Richard J. Freer, Ph.D.
		
	 Address:
	 	601 Biotech Drive             
		 	Richmond, Virginia 23235
		
	 Date:
	 	2/1/06
#### In the Matter of Eugene Miller, an Infant.

Motion granted and appeal added to January 1961 Calendar for argument.
w
a USGS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
RVEY

science for a changing world U.S. GEOLOGICAL SU!

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1411-B

Transmissivity of and maximum yields from the Cutler-Maroon zone—PLATE 6
Geldon, A.L., 2002. Hydrologic properties end ground-water flow systems of the Paleozoic rocks in the Upper
Colorado River Basin in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, excluding the San Juan Basin

aT”

39°

}
f

Castle|Dale

Be

Fonteelté, >

esdrogit —

Flaming Gorge

Reservoir

1:2,000,000

25 50 we)
i | |

100 MILES
J

oo

T T T T
25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS

COMPOSITE TRANSMISSIVITY

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO
RIVER BASIN

Flaming Gorge
Reservoir

| hom
fe}

Duchesne.

37°

Z J
= 9 )9 ; hes J Js = 37°
‘ ARLZO (3 4 / Navajo =
Reservoir
« Lees C) .: I
Feriy pati > :
= | {

°
Kayeni
) AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY us }
1

110°" *
107°

1:2,000,000

25 50 75 100 MILES
| ! ! J
T T

25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS

oo

MAXIMUM YIELDS

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO
RIVER BASIN

EXPLANATION

Dts Area where the Cutler-Maroon zone is missing because of erosion or

Line of equal estimated composite transmissivity—Location is approximate.
Interval, in feet squared per day, is variable

nondeposition
Composite Transmissivity
Relative composite transmissivity
Eee Large
a Moderate
]  smmat
—10—

Limit of data

Data sites—Number shown is transmissivity, in feet squared per day

cf Site at which transmissivity was determined from a pumping test
° Site at which transmissivity was determined from a bailing test
a Site at which transmissivity was estimated from pressure injection tests and

thickness determined from a cross section

Maximum Yields

Relative maximum yield

ee
=] Moderate

Small

—100—— Line of equal maximum yield from wells and springs under artesian
conditions—Dashed where approximately located. Interval, in gallons per
minute, is variable

—— Limit of data

Data sites

e Well—Discharge during a drill-stem test, flow to a well during drilling, or flow
from a well after completion is indicated

2 Spring—Discharge is an average at some sites. The largest springs mentioned
in the text are shown

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. base map, 1:2,500,000

COMPOSITE TRANSMISSIVITY OF AND MAXIMUM YIELDS FROM THE CUTLER-MAROON ZONE OF THE CANYONLANDS AQUIFER IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN AND VICINITY
IN ARIZONA, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, UTAH, AND WYOMING

By
Arthur L. Geldon
2002
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert C. Stempel, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Energy Conversion
  Devices, Inc.;

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
  a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
    prepared;

    b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
    the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
    fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
    reporting; and

  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
  our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
  the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
  directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
    likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
    summarize and report financial information; and

    b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
  employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
  over financial reporting.



                                               /s/ Robert C. Stempel
                                               --------------------------
                                               Robert C. Stempel
                                               Chief Executive Officer


  Date: February 9, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 538-539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL21-37-000]


Michigan Public Power Agency; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 23, 2020, Michigan Public Power Agency 
submitted the annual revenue requirement for the provision of Reactive 
Supply and Voltage Control from Generation or Other Sources from the 
reactive power production capability of the Belle River generating 
station, Units 1 and 2, in the above captioned proceeding.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, The Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using 
the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number excluding the

[[Page 539]]

last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At 
this time, the Commission has suspended access to Commission's Public 
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency 
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the 
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact FERC at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95d3d0c7d6dafbf9fcfbf0c6e0e5e5fae7e1d5f3f0e7f6bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cdad9cedfd3f2f0f5f2f9cfe9ececf3eee8dcfaf9eeffb2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll-free, (886) 208-3676 or TYY, 
(202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2021.

    Dated: December 30, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-29249 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Ninth Court of Appeals

BE IT REMEMBERED:

THAT at the term of the Honorable Ninth Court of Appeals of the State of Texas, 

begun and holden at Beaumont on the 1st day of January, A.D. 2017, present, Chief Justice 

STEVE MCKEITHEN and Justices CHARLES KREGER, HOLLIS HORTON and LEANNE 

JOHNSON.

“Pursuant to and in compliance with an Order of the Supreme Court of Texas, 

dated September 27, 2017, it is ordered that these causes be transferred to the Fourteenth Court 

of Appeals, at Houston, Texas, and that the Clerk of this Court certify all orders made in this 

Court, and transmit all records and papers in said cause to the Clerk of the Fourteenth Court of 

Appeals.

09-17-335-CR Phillip Anthony Zagone v. The State of Texas 

09-17-337-CV James K. Collins et al v. D.R. Horton-Texas LTD 

09-17-340-CV Jonathan Paul Rivenbark v. Shannon Rivenbark

09-17-342-CV F. Don Lacy and Homes and More v. Luis A. Castillo

09-17-345-CV James Andrew Brenek, et al v. Frank Jaap

09-17-350-CV Kevin P. Kaley v. Terri E. Kaley

09-17-351-CV Sherry Macha et al v. Touchstone Neurorecovery Center et al

09-17-352-CR Joseph Arthur Alridge v. State of Texas

09-17-354-CV In Re Commitment of John Arthur Graves

09-17-355-CR Jeffrey Michael McDonough v. The State of Texas

09-17-356-CR Jeffrey Michael McDonough v. The State of Texas

09-17-357-CR Leslie Jones Burks v. The State of Texas

09-17-358-CR Leslie Jones Burks v. The State of Texas

09-17-359-CR Cedric Ramon McGills Jr. v. The State of Texas

09-17-361-CV Alex Melvin Wade Jr. v. Dominion at Woodlands

I, Carol Anne Harley, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth District of 

Texas, at the City of Beaumont, herein certify that the foregoing is a true copy of this Court’s 

order entered from this Court to the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas at 

Houston as appears of record in Minute Book Volume 22.”

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix the seal of this Court 

at Beaumont this 2

nd of October 2017.

__________________________

Carol Anne Harley

Clerk of the Court
### §1962. Loan determination factors; written credit declinations

(a) For the purpose of determining whether to make or insure any loan under this subchapter, the Secretary shall take into consideration the net worth of the applicant involved, including all the assets and liabilities of the applicant.

(b) For the purpose of determining whether an applicant under this subchapter is not able to obtain sufficient credit elsewhere, the Secretary shall require at least one written indication of declination of credit, from a legally organized lending institution within reasonable proximity to the applicant, that specifies the reasons for the declination: Provided, That for loans in excess of $300,000, the Secretary shall require at least two such written declinations: Provided further, That for loans of $100,000 or less, the Secretary may waive the requirement of this subsection if the Secretary determines that it would impose an undue burden on the applicant.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §322, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 311; Pub. L. 94–68, §4, Aug. 5, 1975, 89 Stat. 381; Pub. L. 96–438, §3(b)(1), Oct. 13, 1980, 94 Stat. 1873; Pub. L. 104–127, title VI, §622, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1091.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–127 substituted "loans of $100,000 or less" for "loans of $300,000 or less".

1980—Pub. L. 96–438 substituted provisions prescribing factors to be considered in determining whether to make or insure a loan and relating to the need for applicants unable to obtain sufficient credit elsewhere to provide written credit declinations for provisions relating to the purpose and extent of loans under this subchapter.

1975—Pub. L. 94–68 extended authority to finance crop or livestock changes deemed desirable as a result of changes in market demand, and to make emergency loans in excess of the actual loss sustained as a result of the natural disaster.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–127 effective 90 days after Apr. 4, 1996, see section 663(b) of Pub. L. 104–127, set out as a note under section 1922 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–438 effective with respect to loans approved after Oct. 13, 1980, except for certain subsequent emergency loans, see section 3(d) of Pub. L. 96–438, set out as a note under section 1961 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,512<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,624
<PP&E>                                         230,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,188
<BONDS>                                         81,488
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,895
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,884
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,620
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,429
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
<FN>
<F1>Includes restricted short-term investments of $325.
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 516.64 Comprehensive remedies plan. ( a ) A specific, comprehensive remedies plan will be developed in each significant investigation involving fraud or corruption that relates to Army procurement activities. When possible, these plans should be forwarded with the DFARS 209.406-3 reports. In no case, however, should the report be delayed an appreciable time pending completion of the plan. The format for a remedies plan is at figure H-2, appendix G, to this part.
( b ) The plan will be developed initially by the PFA with the participation of the appropriate criminal investigators and other relevant personnel such as the contracting officer. In significant cases the PFA should also coordinate a remedies plan early with PFD. Defective product/product substitution remedies plans must comply with the requirements of appendix D to this part.
( c ) A comprehensive remedies plan will include at a minimum the following information and considerations: ( 1 ) Summary of allegations and investigative results.
( 2 ) Statement of any adverse impact on a DOD mission. DOD investigative organizations, commanders, or procurement officials will also provide this information to prosecutive authorities to enhance prosecution of offenses or to prepare a victim impact statement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(2).
( 3 ) The impact upon combat readiness and safety.
( 4 ) Consideration of each criminal, civil, contractual, and administrative remedy available, and documentation of those remedies, either planned, in progress, or completed.
( 5 ) Restrictions on the pursuit of any remedies such as grand jury information or possible compromise of the investigation.
( d ) When remedies plans are received by PFD they will be coordinated with the headquarters of the appropriate DOD criminal investigative organization involved.
( e ) Testing necessary to support the investigation and remedies plan should comply with figure H-3, appendix G, to this part.
#### HOPKINS v. TUTTLE

No. 365P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 635

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1996.