alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices 

# Order

October 11, 2019

158098

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158098 COA: 343551 Wayne CC: 86

- 006219

- FC;
86

- 006250

- FH ERIC MIGUEL DOWDY

,

Defendant

- Appellant.
_________________________________________/

By order of February 4, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2018 order of the Court of App eals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again
considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

C AVANA GH , J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the denial of leave to appeal in this case, but write separately to highlight particular circumstances I believe should be considered in future Parole Board

decisions.

In 1987 defendant was sentenced for two second

- degr ee murder convictions to terms of 30 to 45 years’ imprisonment, to be served concurrently to each other and consecutively to 2

- year sentences for two felony

- firearm convictions. At that time, conventional thinking was that parole would be achieved earlier from a parolable life

sentence than from the effective 32

- year minimum term defendant had received. Defendant’s attorney filed a motion for resentencing seeking a parolable life sentence. Indeed, defendant had a sentencing agreement to that effect in on e of his cases. The trial court granted the motion, converting defendant’s sentence to parolable life.

However, the Parole Board’s practices changed before it considered defendant’s
case. See Yantus, Sentence Creep: Increasing Penalties in Michigan and the Need forI, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the directio n of the Court.

October 11, 2019

p1008 2

Clerk Sentencing Reform , 47 U Mich J L Reform 645, 690 (Spring 2014) (noting that, “[a]lthough many sentencing judges imposed a life sentence before 1992 with the assumption that the inmate would be eligible for parole, and presumptively released on parole after twelve to twenty years, [after 1992] this was no longer the state’s practice”). Thirty

- two years later, after his original 32

- year minimum sentence would have ended, defendant remains in prison. The Parole Board has many factors to weigh in each of its decisions, to be sure. But when the Parole Board next considers this case, it might also

consider that the tria l court may have intended this defendant to have been paroled already.
#### § 553.2 Purpose.

This part specifies the authorities and assigns the responsibilities for the development, operation, maintenance, and administration of the Army National Military Cemeteries.
EXHIBIT
32
 
 ORION
DIVERSIFIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Orion Diversified Technologies, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 20, 2005 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Orion Diversified
Technologies, Inc.
 
 Date: March
22, 2006
 
 /s/
Irwin Pearl________
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 Date: March
22, 2006
 
 /s/
Irwin Pearl________
 Chief
Financial Officer
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0290

 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM210AD

093-57-207, R3 --- 11/22/91

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
"Exhibit 99a"

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of International Bancshares Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis E. Nixon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By:                  | /s/DENNIS E. NIXONDennis E. Nixon President
| |  | -------------------- | -------------------------------------------
| |  | Date: March 31, 2003
| |  |                      |                                            

---

QuickLinks
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 152 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘move over’’ laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2023 

Mr. MCGOVERN (for himself, Ms. TITUS, Ms. LEGER FERNANDEZ, and Ms. 

KAPTUR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘move over’’ laws. 

Whereas the House of Representatives recognizes law enforcement, fire and rescue, emergency medical services, 

tow truck operators, and transportation workers as traffic incident management responders (as such term is defined by the Traffic Incident Management Handbook of 

the Federal Highway Administration); 

Whereas, due to the increasingly high rate of drivers engaging in risky behaviors on our roadways, including distracted driving, impaired driving, and speeding, many 

traffic incident management responders lose their lives 

while performing their duties each year; 

Whereas, nationally in 2022, 50 traffic incident management 

responders were killed due to roadside collisions; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 152 IH 

Whereas every State has a ‘‘move over’’ law, which has correlated directly to a safer environment along our Nation’s 

roadsides for traffic incident management responders and 

stranded citizens; 

Whereas ‘‘move over’’ laws generally require motorists to 

move at least 1 lane over when there is an emergency or 

rescue activity taking place on the shoulder or side of the 

roadway, or, if unable to do so safely, to slow down and 

pass the scene with caution; 

Whereas a Government Accountability Office report (GAO– 

21–166) on Emergency Responder Safety noted that 

State officials cite raising public awareness as the most 

prevalent challenge to ‘‘move over’’ laws; and 

Whereas providing traffic incident management responders 

an enhanced opportunity to inform the motoring public 

about these laws is critical to the public safety: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘move 

3 over’’ laws; 

4 (2) urges relevant Federal and State agencies, 

5 as well as nongovernmental organizations involved in 

6 traffic incident management response, to spread 

7 awareness and promote the existence of, and adher8 ence to, State ‘‘move over’’ laws; and 

9 (3) urges relevant Federal and State agencies, 

10 as well as nongovernmental organizations involved in 

11 traffic incident management response, to educate the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 152 IH 

1 public further on the dangers and potential loss of 

2 life if the provisions and requirements of State 

3 ‘‘move over’’ laws are not faithfully observed. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.2 –
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS


I,  Vladimir
Fabert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of  Ovale Group, Inc.  on Form10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report  fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of  Ovale Group, Inc. as of the
dates and for the periods referred to in the Report.
 
 
 /s/Vladimir Fabert
Chief Financial Officer
 Date:  June
2, 2008
#### SILVERMAN v. STATE BANK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 17, 1905.)

Action by Harry Silver-man against the State Bank. No opinion. Motion granted, sp far as to dismiss appeal, with $10 costs.-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 3, 2011 

Order 

 

March 3, 2011 

142465 & (49) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 142465 

v CoA: 293319 

 Lapeer CC: 08-009774-FC 

VICTOR MANUEL ANDRADE, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by the attorneys for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered and, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with 

prejudice and without costs.
UAV Look, LLC 2015 1

UAV Look, LLC Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems 

Pre-Flight Checklist

The following steps are to be carried out by the Pilot in Control before operating any sUAS on 

behalf of UAV Look, LLC and as criteria for completion of the Pre-Flight Plan.

Groundstation:

 Check for physical damage to aircraft remote control (RC) and mobile device used for 

telemetry.

 Aircraft RC battery fully charged and firmware is up to date. 

 Mobile device (smart phone, tablet, laptop, etc.) battery is fully charged.

 Telemetry software is up to date. 

 RC switches/settings are in correct positions.

 Connect mobile device to RC controller.

 Power on RC controller.

 Power on mobile device.

 Run telemetry software.

 Make sure RC antennae are in optimal position (if adjustable). 

Aircraft:

 Inspect aircraft for physical damage.

 Aircraft and aircraft battery firmware are up to date. 

 Aircraft battery is fully charged. 

 Battery is securely connected to aircraft.

 Aircraft take-off and landing area is clear of debris, people or any other potential 

obstruction. 

 SD card is empty and securely in its slot in the camera.

 Remove any camera gimbal brace/camera lens cover. 

 Power on aircraft ONLY if groundstation checklist and aircraft checklist to this point are 

complete. 

 Establish connection between aircraft and groundstation by checking aircraft LED 

indicators and telemetry software.

 Conduct aircraft compass calibration.

 Strong GPS connection (minimum 6 satellites). 

 Engage aircraft motors, let idle to ensure motors are fully functioning.

 Lift off, let hover for 10-15 seconds to check for abnormalities. 

 If all systems are functioning correctly, continue operation in accordance with flight plan.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—FOOD SAFETY
# C_2008064EN.01003102.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/31

---

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 20 November 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Metro International GmbH v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf

(Case C-245/05) (1)

1

(2008/C 64/45)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 20.8.2005.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         33,884
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,525,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (75,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    6,195,336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,423,095
<PP&E>                                         3,612,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,508,884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,992,150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,664,323
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       202,390
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,743,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,992,150
<SALES>                                        5,787,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,787,162
<CGS>                                          4,798,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,798,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               941,188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             145,829
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (97,993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (97,993)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (97,993)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.06)



</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The Respite: the officialnewsletter of Rock Creek Park**
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.21/2:R 59/

Item Number:0650-B-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000824232
 
**Past Issues of The Respite:**
2007: WinterSummer
2008: WinterSummer
2009: WinterSummer
 
****Past Issues ofthe Rock Creek Park Newsletter:****
2012: Fall
2013: Winter| Summer
 
April 2, 2020
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Quixote Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:



Date: November 7, 2008

By:

/s/ LESLIE J. JEZUIT Leslie J. Jezuit, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 7, 2008

By:

/s/ DANIEL P. GOREY Daniel P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure.

---



QuickLinks
§ 34.1 Purpose. ( a ) This part prescribes administrative requirements for awards to for-profit organizations.
( b ) Applicability to prime awards and subawards is as follows: ( 1 ) *Prime awards.* DoD Components shall apply the provisions of this part to awards to for-profit organizations. DoD Components shall not impose requirements that are in addition to, or inconsistent with, the requirements provided in this part, except: ( i ) In accordance with the deviation procedures or special award conditions in § 34.3 or § 34.4, respectively; or
( ii ) As required by Federal statute, Executive order, or Federal regulation implementing a statute or Executive order.
( 2 ) *Subawards.* ( i ) Any legal entity (including any State, local government, university or other nonprofit organization, as well as any for-profit entity) that receives an award from a DoD Component shall apply the provisions of this part to subawards with for-profit organizations. It should be noted that subawards (see definition in § 34.2) are financial assistance for substantive programmatic performance and do not include recipients' procurement of goods and services.
( ii ) For-profit organizations that receive prime awards covered by this part shall apply to each subaward the administrative requirements that are applicable to the particular type of subrecipient.
[63 FR 12204, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 85 FR 51244, Aug. 19, 2020]
EXHIBIT
32
 
 ORION
DIVERSIFIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Orion Diversified Technologies, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 20, 2005 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Orion Diversified
Technologies, Inc.
 
 Date: December
20, 2005
 
 /s/
Irwin Pearl________
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 Date: December
20, 2005
 
 /s/
Irwin Pearl________
 Chief
Financial Officer
#### ESTATE OF MULLIS v. MONROE OIL CO.

No. 426PA97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 277

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 November 1997.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 6, 2006

|MS Structured Asset Corp.                         
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

|Delaware                                        | 333-101155                | 13-4026700                        
|----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                                               
|(State or Other Jurisdiction  of Incorporation) | (Commission File  Number) | (IRS Employer  Identification No.)



|1585 Broadway, Second Floor  New York, New York  Attention: Madhu Philips | 10036     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------
|                                                                         
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                                  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

|Not Applicable                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





---







Section 8Other Events



| | Item 8.01 | Other Events
| | --------- | ------------



On February 2, 2006, the Company issued a press release regarding the occurrence of a Trust Wind-Up Event under the terms of the Trust Agreement governing SATURNS Trust No. 2003-14, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.





| |  | 
| |  | 





---







SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.



Date: February 6, 2006

MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.

(Registrant)

By: /s/ Madhu Philips

Name:     Madhu Philips
Title:     Vice President





| |  | 
| |  | 





---







EXHIBIT INDEX

|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release, dated February 2, 2006
|------------ | -------------------------------------







| |  | 
| |  | 





---
#### § 552.111 Severability.

If a provision of this Regulation is declared unconstitutional, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the constitutionality or validity of every other provision of this Regulation shall not be affected thereby.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132260 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132260 COA: 266674 Kent CC: 04-005016-FC THEODORE LEE LAWTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 4, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

l1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 29, 2006

Clerk
### §1446e–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §145(e), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 918

Section, Pub. L. 101–624, title I, §102, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3378; Pub. L. 102–237, title I, §118(e), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1842, related to milk manufacturing marketing adjustment.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §145(e), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 918, provided that the repeal of this section is effective on the first day of the first month beginning after Apr. 4, 1996.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Battaglia, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of the crimes of burglary, .third degree, attempted grand larceny, first degree, and violation of section 408 of the Penal Law, a felony.) Present ■—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### (A) In the Matter of Anthony J. Bianchi, Doing Business as Showboat, Petitioner, v. Thomas E. Rohan et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondent. (B) In the Matter of Elizabeth Mastrantonio, as Executrix of James J. Mastrantonio, Deceased, Appellant, v. Grant F. Daniels et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondent. (C) Samuel Wallins, Claimant, v. State of New York, Defendant.

[In each action] Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation.
### §1433f. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §171(b)(2)(I), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 938

Section, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title IV, §427, as added Oct. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–354, title I, §119(a)(1), 108 Stat. 3207, required producer to obtain at least catastrophic risk protection insurance coverage as condition of receiving any benefit (including payments) for each of 1995 and subsequent crops of tobacco, rice, extra long staple cotton, upland cotton, feed grains, wheat, peanuts, oilseeds, and sugar.