alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



ENNIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2006
 EXHIBIT 32.2
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 /s/ Richard L. Travis, Jr.

Richard L. Travis, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerDate: December 22, 2006
 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
### §1636f. Publication of information on retail purchase prices for representative meat products

#### (a) In general

Beginning not later than 90 days after October 22, 1999, the Secretary shall compile and publish at least monthly (weekly, if practicable) information on retail prices for representative food products made from beef, pork, chicken, turkey, veal, or lamb.

#### (b) Information

The report published by the Secretary under subsection (a) shall include—

(1) information on retail prices for each representative food product described in subsection (a); and

(2) information on total sales quantity (in pounds and dollars) for each representative food product.

#### (c) Meat Price Spreads Report

During the period ending 2 years after the initial publication of the report required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall continue to publish the Meat Price Spreads Report in the same manner as the Report was published before October 22, 1999.

#### (d) Information collection

#### (1) In general

To ensure the accuracy of the reports required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall obtain the information for the reports from one or more sources including—

(A) a consistently representative set of retail transactions; and

(B) both prices and sales quantities for the transactions.

#### (2) Source of information

The Secretary may—

(A) obtain the information from retailers or commercial information sources; and

(B) use valid statistical sampling procedures, if necessary.

#### (3) Adjustments

In providing information on retail prices under this section, the Secretary may make adjustments to take into account differences in—

(A) the geographic location of consumption;

(B) the location of the principal source of supply;

(C) distribution costs; and

(D) such other factors as the Secretary determines reflect a verifiable comparative retail price for a representative food product.

#### (e) Administration

The Secretary—

(1) shall collect information under this section only on a voluntary basis; and

(2) shall not impose a penalty on a person for failure to provide the information or otherwise compel a person to provide the information.

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title II, §257, as added Pub. L. 106–78, title IX, §911(2), Oct. 22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1204.)
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI

GOVERNOR April 24. 2008 David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch U .S. EPA Region I 1 Congress St., Suite 1100 Boston, Ma. 02114-2023

I've enclosed Maine's recently-adopted Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) plan for your approval and inclusion into Maine's State Implementation Plan. TheSection 110(a)(2)(D)(i) plan was posted to a 30-day public comment period with an opportunity to request a public hearing. Public notice of the proposal and comment period was published in the Kennebec Journal onJanuary4, 2008. The Department did not receive any comments or requests for a public hearing on this proposal . On April 3, 2008, the Board of Environmental Protection adopted these amendments to the MaineState Implementation Plan. The Department is confident that the enclosed submission will satisfy all EPA requirements. Attachment 1 Memorandumto the Board of Environmental Protection dated November 14, 2007 requesting a 30-day public comment period and opportunity to request a public hearing; 2 Copy of legal notice for 30-day public comment period and opportunity to request a public hearing; 3 Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) plan demonstrating that that emissions fromMaine do not contribute significantly to other state's nonattainment or interfere with maintenance ofthe 8-hour ozone or PM2 .5 NAAQS, or otherwise interfere with visibility protection or other state's efforts to prevent significant deterioration of air quality. 4 Memorandumto the Board of Environmental Protection dated March 6, 2008, requesting adoption of the proposed SIPsubmittals; and DAVID P . LITTELL COMMISSIONER

AUGUSTA 17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 106 HOGAN ROAD 312 CANCOROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK (207) 287-7688 FAX

: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769-2094 RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 941-4570 FAX : (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX : (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX : (207) 760-3143 web site: www

.maine .gov/dep printed on recycled paper5 Certification by the Attorney General that the State followed all relevant requirements of the Maine Administrative Procedures Act in conducting the public hearing and completing the submittal process. If you should have anyquestions, please contactJeff Crawford at 207-287-2437. Sincerely,

ames P . Brooks, Director Bureau of Air Quality Attachments (7) cc: AnnArnold Jeff Crawford SIPfile (w/encl .) EPAfile
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 6-K



REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Dated July 5, 2006



Commission File Number: 001-14666



MITTAL STEEL COMPANY N.V.

(Translation of registrants name into English)



15th Floor, Hofplein 20

3032 AC Rotterdam

The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-FxForm 40-Fo



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



YesoNox



If Yes marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________































| |  | 
| |  | 





---







On July 5, 2006, Mittal Steel Company N.V. issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.



Exhibit List



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                               | 
|------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated July 5, 2006, announcing Mittal Steels final approval and timetable of its tender offer for Arcelor.















| |  | 
| |  | 





---







SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: July 5, 2006



| | By: | /s/ Henk Scheffer
| | --- | -----------------
| |     | Name:            
| |     | Title:           



























| |  | 
| |  | 





---







Exhibit Index



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                               | 
|------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated July 5, 2006, announcing Mittal Steels final approval and timetable of its tender offer for Arcelor.

















| |  | 
| |  |
#### § 552.97 Communications.

The Ft. Lewis Area Access Section communicates by telephone as noted on the permit. Tactical FM contact may be made through Range Operations.
Order entered January 18 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 22
- 01181
- CR
DEVYN KENARD COLEMAN , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 283 rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F21
- 57668
- T
O RDER Before the Court is C ourt R eporter Sharina A. Fowler’s January 17, 2023 request for an extension of time in which to file the reporter’s record. We
GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s record due FEBRUARY 1 7 , 2023

.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Sharina A. Fowler, Court Reporter, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
1 

Filed 10/9/14 P. v. Hipes CA3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT 

(Butte) 

---- 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

CHARLES DEAN HIPES, JR., 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

C075873 

(Super. Ct. No. CM039935) 

 This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). 

Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we affirm the judgment. 

 We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of 

the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.) 
2 

BACKGROUND 

 Law officers received a report that two sets of keys and a cell phone were stolen 

from a park bench. Defendant Charles Dean Hipes, Jr., who officers knew had been 

involved in a number of thefts, was nearby. Officers contacted him, conducted a 

probation search, and recovered the keys and cell phone. In addition, they found three 

hypodermic syringes in defendant’s pants pockets. 

 A complaint charged defendant with receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, 

subd. (a)),1 with an additional allegation that defendant had served two prior prison terms 

(§ 667.5, subd. (b)), and possession of an injection/ingestion device (Health & Saf. Code, 

§ 11364.1, subd. (a)(1)). 

 Defendant pleaded no contest to receiving stolen property, with an agreed 

maximum sentence of three years. The remaining charges were dismissed. The trial 

court sentenced defendant to the upper term of three years and ordered defendant to pay a 

$280 restitution fund fine (§ 1202.4), a $30 conviction assessment (Gov. Code, § 70373), 

and a $40 court operations assessment (§ 1465.8). The court awarded defendant 141 days 

of presentence custody credits. The trial court denied defendant’s request for a certificate 

of probable cause. 

DISCUSSION 

 We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening 

brief setting forth the facts of the case and, pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, 

requesting the court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable 

issues on appeal. Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental 

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. We have undertaken an 

 

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. 
3 

examination of the entire record pursuant to Wende, and we find no arguable error that 

would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. 

DISPOSITION 

 The judgment is affirmed. 

 RAYE , P. J. 

We concur: 

 BLEASE , J. 

 HULL , J.
Exhibit 15.4





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111310 and 333-152335) pertaining to the Employees' Stock Option Plans of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. Of our report dated March 9, 2010 with respect to the financial statements of Pocared Diagnostics Ltd. Included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERERTel-Aviv, Israel
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERERMarch 28, 2010
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10 (b)
                              SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE

     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made and entered into as of the 30th
day of January, 1995, between UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, as
"Landlord", and QUIXOTE CORPORATION, as "Tenant".

     WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant previously entered into a Lease (the
"Lease"), pursuant to which Landlord leased to Tenant, and Tenant leased
from Landlord, the premises commonly known as Suite 3000 on the 30th floor
of the One East Wacker Drive Building, Chicago, Illinois, on the terms and
provisions therein set forth.

     WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant thereafter entered into an amendment to
the Lease (the "First Lease Amendment"), pursuant to which Suite 2320,
located on the 23rd floor of the One East Wacker Drive Building, Chicago,
Illinois (the "Expansion Space"), was added to the Premises under the
Lease, on the terms and provisions set forth in the First Lease Amendment.

     WHEREAS, Tenant recently expressed its desire to delete the Expansion
Space from the Premises, and Landlord and Tenant have reached an agreement
with respect to the deletion of the Expansion Space from the Premises, and
they wish to set forth their agreement in said respects in writing.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the reciprocal agreements herein
contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and
receipt whereof hereby is acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
     1.  the above recitals are incorporated in and made an express part of
this Second Amendment to Lease.
     2.  As of December 31, 1994, the Expansion Space shall be deemed
deleted from the Premises under the Lease; as of said date, the increases
in the Base Rent which were set forth in paragraph 4 of the First Lease
Amendment no longer shall be applicable;  and as of said date, Tenant shall
have no further rights or options as set forth in the First Lease
Amendment.  After said date, the Premises shall consist only of the
Premises originally described in the Lease, and the Base Rent that is due
and payable by Tenant under the Lease shall be reduced to the Base Rent
originally set forth in the Lease.
     3.  Landlord hereby acknowledges receipt from Tenant of a Termination
Fee, which was paid by Tenant to Landlord in consideration for Landlord's
deletion of the Expansion Space from the Premises;  and Landlord hereby
acknowledges that Tenant has vacated and surrendered to Landlord possession
of the Expansion Space.
    4.  Except as expressly stated herein, the Lease shall be and
remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease
Termination Agreement as of the date and year above first written.


LANDLORD:                                   TENANT:

United Insurance Company of America         Quixote Corporation

By:/s/ David F. Bengston                    By:/s/ Myron R. Shain     
   --------------------------                  --------------------------
Its: Vice President                         Its: Vice President                
   --------------------------                  --------------------------
# o?--?-<;\

Docket No.FAA-2010~ Record ofEx Parte Contacts I Directorate Idct;ltifier: 2009-NM-252-AD

, With whom outside the FAA has this action beeD discusSed (i.c., Design Approval Holder, , manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAM:A, ete)? (You might need 10submit a separate I 

# !lii! record to the Rules Docket. TheAD Manual dEfines "ExPmte O,Olllucts. '') \;:,_7 ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED I DATE RESPONSE ATA JOE WHITE 

### 09/08/20] 0 Concur. 

### Boeing LonO" Beach JlMFINN 

### 09/08/2010 

# I Concur. I I 

### I

, I I

, I Other!Additionallnfomlation:
#### STEIN et al. v. MARKS et al.

(Supreme-Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Charles Stein and others against Michael Marks and others.

B. Patterson, for appellants.

N. Burkan, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with. $10 costs and disbursements.
#### STATE v. CASHWELL

No. 457P97

Case below: 127 N.CApp. 210

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997,
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03604**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03604\03604_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 03604\03604_Communication.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

03604\03604_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03604\03604_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03604\03604_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03604\03604_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03604\03604_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03604\03604_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03604\03604_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03604\Certification Statement Plant ID 03604.pdf Plant certification statement x 03604\Questions for Plant ID 03604.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up

03604\Supplemental Documents\03604_LGE-MC - Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03604\Supplemental Documents\03604_LGE-MC - D-1 Wastewater Treatment Block Diagram - 1011r7.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03604\Supplemental Documents\03604_LGE-MC - WB-1 Water Balance Block Diagram - 1011r7.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03604\Supplemental Documents\03604_LGE-Mill Creek A5-2 - Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We have issued our report dated May 20, 2009, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements and internal control over financialreporting included in the Annual Report of UQM Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Kfor the year ended March 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of said report in the Registration Statements of UQM Technologies,Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 033-34612, File No. 033-81430, File No. 033-92288,File No. 333-101371, File No. 333-129241 and File No. 333-129251) and Forms S-3(File No. 333-50393, File No 333-126946 and File No. 333-144835).

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

Denver, Colorado

May 20, 2009
* Honorable Harlington Wood, Jr., Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 95-3020.Arthur MODDER and Gail Modder, Plaintiffs-Counter DefendantsAppellants,

v.AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS, DefendantCounter Claimant-Appellee. May 29, 1997. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. (No. 92-1243-CIV-T-24C), Elizabeth A. Jenkins, Judge. Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WOOD * , Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM: In a prior opinion, Modder v. American Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 86 F.3d 1070 (11th Cir.1996), we determined that this case involved a dispositive but unsettled question of Florida law. Accordingly, we certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida: Does the exclusionary provision of Section 627.6515(2), Florida Statutes, exempt an insurer from liability under Section 627.6698, Florida Statutes, and if so, has the insurer in this case provided the factual predicate necessary to come within the exclusionary provision? Modder, 86 F.3d at 1071-72. The Supreme Court of Florida has now answered the certified question in the affirmative stating: [W]e answer the first part of the Eleventh Circuit's certified question in the affirmative and hold that the clear language of section 627.6515(2) establishes that the attorney's fee penalty of section 627.6698, like the rest of part VII, is not applicable to policies described in section 627.6515(2)..... In light of the district court's factual findings that (1) the NBA [National Business Association] was formed primarily for purposes other than providing insurance, and (2) that ANTEX [American National Life Insurance Company of Texas] also has complied with section 627.6515(2)(b) and (c), we answer the second part of the Eleventh Circuit's question in the affirmative. Modder v. American Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 688 So.2d 330, 333-34 (Fla.1997). Based on this answer, we conclude, as did the Supreme Court of Florida, that the ANTEX group policy providing health insurance coverage to the Modders comes within the exclusionary provision of Section 627.6515(2), Florida Statutes. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order denying the Modders' motion for attorney's fees.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Sasol Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending 30 June 2013, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



Date: 9 October 2013By:

/s/ DAVID EDWARD CONSTABLEDavid Edward Constable Chief Executive OfficerDate: 9 October 2013By:

/s/ PAUL VICTORPaul Victor Acting Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Sasol Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even if the document with which it is
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.

---



QuickLinks