alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SUBCHAPTER II—OPERATING LOANS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1956—Act Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 829, §2[6], 70 Stat. 802, substituted "OPERATING LOANS" for "PRODUCTION AND SUBSISTENCE LOANS".

1946—Act Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 964, §4, 60 Stat. 1071, substituted "PRODUCTION AND SUBSISTENCE LOANS" for "REHABILITATION LOANS".
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Michael C. Coffman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Panhandle Royalty Company(the Company);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have: a).  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b).  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c).  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d).  Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors: a).  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b).  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   /s/ Michael C. Coffman   Michael C. Coffman  Chief Financial Officer  Date: December 12, 2006
### **CHAPTER 18—COOPERATIVE MARKETING**

Sec.
451.
"Agricultural products" defined.
452.
Supervision of division of cooperative marketing.
453.
Authority and duties of division.
454.
Advisers to counsel with Secretary of Agriculture; expenses and subsistence.
455.
Dissemination of crop, market, etc., information by cooperative marketing associations.
456.
Rules and regulations; appointment, removal, and compensation of employees; expenditures; authorization of appropriations.
457.
Separability.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Rochon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: April 12, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard Rochon           
|                     |  |  |  | Richard Rochon               
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

Note: This certification is being furnished, not filed, as exhibit 32.1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Theregression of the node of the Quadrantids**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:3/1
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001059559
 
June 4, 2018
#### Fredylyn B. F. Rubin et al., Respondents, v. Aero Mayflower Transit Company, Appellant.

Judgment entered on April 15, 1963, unanimously modified so as to reduce the award to the infant plaintiff to the sum of $22,500, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendant-appellant, as against the infant plaintiff and with costs to plaintiff Herbert M. Fern against the defendant-appellant. The award of damages in the sum of $30,000 to the infant plaintiff is excessive and not justified on the record. 'Settle order on notice. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
**Exhibit (32)(a)**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Empire District Electric Company(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),William L. Gipson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **By** | ** /s/  William L. Gipson**       | ** ** |
|--------|----------------------------------------|------------|
| Name:  | William  L. Gipson                     |       |
| Title: | President  and Chief Executive Officer |       |
|   |
| Date:  | November  7, 2007                      |
|        |                                        |            |  |  |  |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to The Empire District ElectricCompany and will be retained by The Empire District Electric Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
ALASKA CALIFORNIA FLORIDA MID-PACIFIC NORTHEAST NORTHERN ROCKIES

NORTHWEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN WASHINGTON, DC INTERNATIONAL

156 WILLIAM STREET SUITE 800 NEW YORK, NY 10038

T: 212.791.1881 F: 212.918.1556 E: neo ffice@earthjustice.org W: www.earthjustice.org September 10, 1010

Alan Carpien Office of General Counsel, U.S. EPA 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460

Daniel Dertke U.S. Department of Justice

Environment & Natural Resources Div.

Environmental Defense Section

P.O. Box 23986 Washington, D.C. 20026-3986

Via Electronic Mail and U.S. Mail

Dear Alan and Dan,

I am writing to confirm that the Sierra Club withdraws its Janua ry 29, 2009 petition to reconsider and repeal the 2008 Revisions to the Definition of Solid Waste in keeping with the terms of the settlement agreement entered into by the Sierra Club and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) on September 7, 2010.

We are very pleased that EPA has agreed to c onsider the concerns raised in the petition in the context of a formal rulemaking process, and we very much look forward to working with the agency as that process goes forward.

Sincerely,

Abigail Dillen
§ 757.15 Claims not asserted. In some cases, public policy considerations limit the DoN's assertion of claims against apparent third-party tortfeasors or a contract where the Government would be a third party beneficiary. Claims are not asserted against: ( a ) *Federal Government agencies.* Claims are not asserted against any department, agency or instrumentality of the United States. “Agency or instrumentality” includes self-insured, non-appropriated-fund activities but does not include private associations.
( b ) *Injured service members, dependents, and employees of the United States.* Claims are not asserted directly against a servicemember, the dependent of a servicemember, or an employee of the United States who is injured as a result of his own willful or negligent acts. The United States does assert, however, against policies that cover the injury.
( c ) *Employers of merchant seamen.* Claims are not asserted against the employer of a merchant seaman who receives Federal medical care under 42 U.S.C. 249.
( d ) *Department of Veterans' Affairs care for service-connected disability.* Claims are not asserted for care provided to a veteran by the Department of Veterans' Affairs when the care is for a service-connected disability. The United States will, however, claim for the reasonable value of care provided an individual before he is transferred to a Department of Veterans' Affairs hospital. This policy does not apply in cases where the MTF referred the patient to the Veterans' Affairs hospital and then paid for the care.
[57 FR 5072, Feb. 12, 1992, as amended at 72 FR 53428, Sept. 19, 2007]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER  30, 1998 AND THE RELATED  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS  OF INCOME AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 OF THREE-FIVE  SYSTEMS,  INC. AND ITS  SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.  THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED  FILED FOR  PURPOSES  OF  SECTION  11 OF THE  SECURITIES  ACT OF 1933 AND
SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE  SUBJECT TO THE
LIABILITY  OF SUCH  SECTIONS,  NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY OTHER FILING
WHICH INCORPORATES THIS REPORT BY REFERENCE,  UNLESS SUCH OTHER FILING EXPRESSLY
INCORPORATES THIS EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,706
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                       614
<INVENTORY>                                     13,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,045
<PP&E>                                          48,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,630
<BONDS>                                          4,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,601
<SALES>                                         65,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,733
<CGS>                                           53,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    70
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,957
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,715
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,715
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsModular approach for satellite communication ground terminalsThe trend in satellite communications is toward completely digital, time division multiple access (TDMA) systems with uplink and downlink data rates dictated by the type of service offered. Trunking terminals will operate in the 550 MBPS (megabit per second) region uplink and downlink, whereas customer premise service (CPS) terminals will operate in the 25 to 10 MBPS region uplink and in the 200 MBPS region downlink. Additional criteria for the ground terminals will be to maintain clock sychronization with the system and burst time integrity to within a matter of nanoseconds, to process required order-fire information, to provide adaptive data scrambing, and to compensate for variations in the user input output data rates, and for changes in range in the satellite communications links resulting from satellite perturbations in orbit. To achieve the required adaptability of a ground terminal to the above mentioned variables, programmable building blocks can be developed that will meet all of these requirements. To maintain system synchronization, i.e., all bursted data arriving at the satellite within assigned TDMA windows, ground terminal transmit data rates and burst timing must be maintained within tight tolerances. With a programmable synchronizer as the heart of the terminal timing generation, variable data rates and burst timing tolerances are achievable. In essence, the unit inputs microprocessor generated timing words and outputs discrete timing pulses.Document ID19840008357Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsGould, G. R.*(Analex Corp. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberE-1960NAS 1.26:168327NASA-CR-168327Meeting InformationMeeting: Commun. Satellite Systems Conf.Location: Orlando, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: March 18, 1984End Date: March 22, 1984Sponsors:AIAAAccession Number84N16425Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-23923Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840008357.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §2357. Unauthorized practice

Anyone who in the United States engages in direct or indirect practice before the Office of Plant Variety Protection while suspended or excluded under section 2356 of this title, or without being admitted to practice before the Office, shall be liable in a civil action for the return of all money received, and for compensation for damage done by such person and also may be enjoined from such practice. However, there shall be no liability for damage if such person establishes that the work was done competently and without negligence. This section does not apply to anyone who, without a claim of self-sufficiency, works under the supervision of another who stands admitted and is the responsible party; or to anyone who establishes that the person acted only on behalf of any employer by whom the person was regularly employed.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title I, §27, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1545; Pub. L. 103–349, §13(e), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3143.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–349 substituted "the person" for "he" in two places in last sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
#### Blanche Siekierski et al., Appellants, v. Ralph J. Derleth et al., Respondents.

Appeal dismissed unless records and briefs are filed and served on or before October 28, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed on or before November 17, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at November 1960 Term of court.
§ 634.10 Remedial driver training programs. ( a ) Navy activities will comply with OPNAVINST 5100.12 Series, and Marine Corps activities with current edition of MCO 5100.19C for establishment of remedial training programs.
( b ) Installation commanders may establish a remedial driver-training program to instruct and educate personnel requiring additional training. Personnel may be referred to a remedial program on the basis of their individual driving history or incidents requiring additional training. The curriculum should provide instruction to improve driving performance and compliance with traffic laws.
( c ) Installation commanders may schedule periodic courses, or if not practical, arrange for participation in courses conducted by local civil authorities.
( d ) Civilian personnel employed on the installation, contractor employees, and family members of military personnel may attend remedial courses on the installation, or similar courses off the installation which incur no expense to the government.
### §2009aa–7. Program development criteria

#### (a) In general

In considering programs and projects to be provided assistance under this subchapter, and in establishing a priority ranking of the requests for assistance provided by the Authority, the Authority shall follow procedures that ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, consideration of—

(1) the relationship of the project or class of projects to overall regional development;

(2) the per capita income and poverty and unemployment rates in an area;

(3) the financial resources available to the applicants for assistance seeking to carry out the project, with emphasis on ensuring that projects are adequately financed to maximize the probability of successful economic development;

(4) the importance of the project or class of projects in relation to other projects or classes of projects that may be in competition for the same funds;

(5) the prospects that the project for which assistance is sought will improve, on a continuing rather than a temporary basis, the opportunities for employment, the average level of income, or the economic development of the area served by the project; and

(6) the extent to which the project design provides for detailed outcome measurements by which grant expenditures and the results of the expenditures may be evaluated.

#### (b) No relocation assistance

No financial assistance authorized by this subchapter shall be used to assist a person or entity in relocating from one area to another, except that financial assistance may be used as otherwise authorized by this chapter to attract businesses from outside the region to the region.

#### (c) Reduction of funds

Funds may be provided for a program or project in a State under this subchapter only if the Authority determines that the level of Federal or State financial assistance provided under a law other than this subchapter, for the same type of program or project in the same area of the State within the region, will not be reduced as a result of funds made available by this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §382H, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(4) [div. B, title V, §503], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–279.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 20

- 00612

- CR

David Rivera CORTEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR5189

Honorable Sid L. Harle , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 17, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

On February 1, 2021, the court ordered appellant , David Rivera Cortez, t o show cause why

this appea l should not be dismissed. On Febru a ry 4, 2021, Cortez’s appointed counsel filed a

response conceding that the trial court (1 ) ruled on no written motions before it took the parties’

negotiated plea agreement under advisement on March 2, 2020; (2) later f ollowed this plea

agreement on November 13, 2020; and (3) has since steadfastly refused to grant appellant any04

- 20

- 00612

- CR

- 2

- permission to appeal

. T herefore, counsel agreed “ this Court has little choice but to dismiss the

instant attempted appeal.” Accordingly, we dis miss this appeal.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
### §2626. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this chapter and of the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 91–670, title III, §317, Jan. 11, 1971, 84 Stat. 2047.)