alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32 (b)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Enzo Biochem, Inc., and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Barry Weiner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |     |                        
|----------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|Date:
 October 12, 2007 | By: | /s/ Barry
 Weiner      
|                        |     |                        
|                        |     |                        
|                        |     | Barry Weiner           
|                        |     | Chief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
§ 68.1 Purpose. This part: ( a ) Implements policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for the operation of voluntary education programs in the DoD.
( b ) Establishes policy stating the eligibility criteria for tuition assistance (TA) and the requirement for a memorandum of understanding (MOU) from all educational institutions providing educational programs through the DoD TA Program.
( c ) Establishes policy that: ( 1 ) All educational institutions providing education programs through the DoD Tuition Assistance (TA) Program: ( i ) Will provide meaningful information to students about the financial cost and attendance at an institution so military students can make informed decisions on where to attend school.
( ii ) Will not use unfair, deceptive, and abusive recruiting practices.
( iii ) Will provide academic and student support services to Service members and their families.
( 2 ) Creates rules to strengthen existing procedures for access to DoD installations by educational institutions.
( 3 ) Requires an annual review and notification process of uniform semester-hour (or equivalent) TA caps and annual TA ceilings.
( 4 ) Requires the Military Departments to provide their Service members with a joint services transcript (JST).
( 5 ) Implements the DoD Postsecondary Education Complaint System for Service members, spouses, and adult family members to register student complaints.
( 6 ) Authorizes the Military Departments to establish Service-specific TA eligibility criteria and management controls.
( d ) Establishes the Interservice Voluntary Education Board.
§ 536.6 The Army claims mission. ( a ) Promptly investigate potential claims incidents with a view to determining the degree of the Army's exposure to liability, the damage potential, and when the third party is at fault, whether the Army should take action to collect for medical expenses, lost wages and property damage.
( b ) Efficiently and expeditiously dispose of claims against the U.S. by fairly settling meritorious claims at the lowest level within the claims system commensurate with monetary jurisdiction delegated, or by denying non-meritorious claims.
( c ) Develop a system that has a high level of proficiency, so that litigation and appeals can be avoided or kept to a minimum.
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—COORDINATION WITH NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES; INSPECTOR GENERAL; UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; COAST GUARD; GENERAL PROVISIONS
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.0 Scope.

This part establishes standard policies and procedures for all administrative claims resulting from Air Force activities and for which the Air Force has assigned responsibility.

[81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1
<CASH>                            28,205
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                     13,237
<ALLOWANCES>                       3,212
<INVENTORY>                        3,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  45,684
<PP&E>                            17,746
<DEPRECIATION>                    13,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    56,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             10,869
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                             118
<OTHER-SE>                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      56,283
<SALES>                           27,321
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  27,321
<CGS>                             12,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     25,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    2,322
<INCOME-TAX>                         939
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                1,383
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       1,383
<EPS-BASIC>                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.13



</TABLE>
# FORM 6-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

# Report of Foreign Issuer

# Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of

# Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of March 2004

ABBEY NATIONAL PLC(Translation of registrants
 name into English)

Abbey House, 2 Triton Square, Regents PlaceLondon
 NW1 3AN, England(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate
 by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form
 40-F.

Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . .

Indicate
 by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby
 furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934.

Yes . . . . . . . No . . .X. . . .

---







ABBEY NATIONAL PLC

NOTIFICATION OF DISPOSAL OF MAJOR INTEREST IN SHARES



Abbey National plc has received confirmation, pursuant to s198 of the Companies
  Act 1985, that as at the close of business on 24th March, 2004, the interest
  of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) in the ordinary share capital of Abbey
  National plc has fallen below 3%.



Contact



Shaun Coles
  Tel: 0207 756 4766



---

# SIGNATURES

Pursuant
 to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report
 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



|                          | ABBEY NATIONAL PLC                                           
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
      29 March 2004 |                                                              
|                          | By:  /s/ Shaun
      Coles
      Shaun ColesAbbey Secretariat
EXHIBIT 32.1

ALTERA CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Altera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Daane, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 25, 2008



/s/ JOHN DAANEJohn DaaneChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altera Corporation and will be retained by
Altera Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In re LAMB. In the matter of George A. Lamb, an attorney.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

No opinion. Order to show cause will be granted.
**EXHIBIT 31.A** **CERTIFICATION**     I, James J. Cleary, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of El Paso Natural Gas Company;     2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this Report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this Report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this Report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. */s/  James    J. Cleary*    James J. Cleary    President    (Principal Executive Officer)    El Paso Natural Gas Company     Date: May 7, 2007
§ 516.75 Policy. ( a ) Active duty soldiers should fulfill their civic responsibility by serving on state and local juries, so long as it does not interfere with military duties.
( b ) The following active duty soldiers are exempt from complying with summons to serve on state and local juries: ( 1 ) General officers.
( 2 ) Commanders.
( 3 ) Active duty soldiers stationed outside the United States, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands.
( 4 ) Active duty soldiers in a training status.
( 5 ) Active duty soldiers assigned to forces engaged in operations.
( c ) Other active duty soldiers may be exempted from serving on local juries if compliance with such summons would have either of the following effects: ( 1 ) It would unreasonably interfere with performance of the soldier's military duties; or,
( 2 ) It would adversely affect the readiness of a summoned soldier's unit, command, or activity.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 1542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00075]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nature McGinn, ACA Permit Officer, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-8030; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eaaba9ab9a8f9887839e99aa84998cc48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f4b5b7b5849186999d8087b49a8792da939b82">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 24, 2020, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. The permit was issued on December 28, 2020 to:

1. Ari S. Friedlaender Permit No. 2021-006

Erika N. Davis,
Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2021-00075 Filed 1-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.(a).1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Scailex Corporation Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |                          
|------------------- | -------------------------
|Date: June 30, 2008 |                          
|                   
|                    | /s/ Yahel
  Shachar      
|                    |                          
|                    | Yahel
  Shachar          
|                    | Chief
  Executive Officer

---

---
**Exhibit 21**

**List ofSubsidiaries**

Subsidiaries ofInternational Bancshares Corporation
|                            |   | State of Incorporation |   |                  |   |           |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|----------------|
| Name                       |   | or Organization        |   | Business              |   | % of Ownership |
|                       |   |                   |   |                  |   |           |
| IBC Subsidiary Corporation |   | Delaware               |   | Bank Holding Company  |   | 100%           |
| IBC Life Insurance Company |   | Texas                  |   | Credit Life Insurance |   | 100%           |
| IBC Trading Company        |   | Texas                  |   | Export Trading        |   | 100%           |
| IBC Capital Corporation    |   | Texas                  |   | Investments           |   | 100%           |

 

Subsidiaries ofIBC Subsidiary Corporation
|                                    |   | State of Incorporation |   |                            |   |           |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|----------------|
| Name                               |   | or Organization        |   | Business                        |   | % of Ownership |
|                               |   |                   |   |                            |   |           |
| International Bank of Commerce     |   | Texas                  |   | State Bank                      |   | 100%           |
| Commerce Bank                      |   | Texas                  |   | State Bank                      |   | 100%           |
| International Bank of Commerce,    |   |                   |   |                            |   |           |
|  Zapata                       |   | Texas                  |   | State Bank                      |   | 100%           |
| International Bank of Commerce,    |   |                   |   |                            |   |           |
|  Brownsville                  |   | Texas                  |   | State Bank                      |   | 100%           |
| Gulfstar Group I, Ltd.             |   | Texas                  |   | Investment and Merchant Banking |   | 70%            |
| Gulfstar Group II, Ltd.            |   | Texas                  |   | Investment Banking              |   | 70%            |
| Gulfstar Merchant Banking II, Ltd. |   | Texas                  |   | Merchant Banking                |   | 70%            |

 

----
#### PATTI v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO.

No. 376P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 643

Petition by plaintiffs for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 November 1997.
#### IN RE SHIREY

No. 466P97

Case below: 127 N.CApp. 396

Petition by juvenile for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997.
§ 761.8 General. ( a ) As indicated in § 761.7(a), certain persons, ships, and aircraft must be specifically authorized under the provisions of this part to enter defense areas.
( b ) When entering or transiting a defense area each person, ship, or aircraft must have a valid authorization or satisfactory evidence thereof.
#### Wilbur F. Connell, Respondent, v. Ardan A. Bradt et al., Appellants.

Order dated October 24, 1962, unanimously reversed and judgment thereon set aside and vacated, without costs of this appeal to either party. Appeal from order dated November 26, 1962 dismissed as academic. Memorandum: In this action to recover on a series of notes growing out of a joint venture between the parties, the defendants-appellants, after service of *856an answer containing a general denial, moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The affidavits in support of the motion set forth in detail that four years after delivery of the notes the plaintiff brought a declaratory judgment action for an accounting and dissolution of the joint venture in which the parties were engaged. In settlement of that action the defendants executed another series of notes for $15,000, and gave other consideration, all of which was paid in full to the plaintiff. Defendants further set forth an agreement between the parties purporting to release the parties from claims against each other. The affidavits of the plaintiff in opposition to the motion contained statements as to the execution of the notes which are the subject of this action but made no reference to and in no way disputed the averments of the defendants dealing with alleged settlement and release. Notwithstanding the issues of fact raised by these affidavits, Special Term *sna sponte*granted summary judgment to the plaintiff. Defendants promptly moved to reargue their motion and to vacate the order and summary judgment granted plaintiff. Defendants further asked leave to amend their answer to set forth affirmative defenses with reference to the settlement and release. In the argument before Special Term Justice who heard the original motion, the court made this statement: “ All I can say that had I known the facts at the original motion, as apparently there is the question about these two sets of notes, which creates an issue of fact as the Court here tells you right away, so you do not have to go into it; I recognize that as an issue of fact.” Notwithstanding the recognition by the court of the fact issues in the litigation, the court denied the motion to renew and vacate. The issues of fact urged by defendants in the second motion should have been obvious to Special Term from the affidavits in the first motion. Under these circumstances it was error to have granted summary judgment to the plaintiff. The defendants should have an opportunity, if they are so advised, to move to amend their answer to assert the affirmative defenses set forth in their moving papers so that upon trial all of the issues between the parties can be finally resolved. (Appeal from judgment and two orders of Niagara Special Term in favor of plaintiff in an action on promissory notes. The first order denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment to plaintiff. The second order denied defendants’ motion to reargue motion for summary judgment anew.) Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman and Henry, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, Lodge 2116, Appellant, and Buffalo Eclipse Corporation, Buffalo Bolt Company Division, Respondent.

Order entered December 18, 1959, and order entered June 21, 1960, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $25 costs and disbursements and motion granted, with $10 costs. Memorandum: Special 'Term should not have undertaken to decide whether the permanent termination of employment on the closing of the plant was a “lay-off” within the meaning of the contract. That is for the arbitrators to decide *(Matter of Potoker [Brooklyn Eagle],*2 R Y 2d 953; *Matter of Lipman [Haeuser Shellac Co.],*289 N. Y. 76). The duty to arbitrate a dispute arising during the term of the agreement survives the expiration thereof. *(Matter of Lane [Endicott Johnson Corp.],*274 App. Div. 833, affd. 299 N. Y. 725.) (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying motion by Clifford, individually and as president of Lodge 2116, to compel respondent to arbitrate certain disputes; also appeal from part of order of Erie Special Term granting leave to petitioner to renew the motion but again denying arbitration.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.