alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
124 STAT. 2622 PUBLIC LAW 111–246—SEPT. 30, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4505: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

June 29, 30, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 20, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–246 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To enable State homes to furnish nursing home care to parents any of whose 

children died while serving in the Armed Forces. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF STATE HOME CARE FOR PARENTS OF VETERANS WHO DIED WHILE SERVING IN ARMED FORCES. 

In administering section 51.210(d) of title 38, Code of Federal 

Regulations, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall permit a State 

home to provide services to, in addition to non-veterans described 

in such subsection, a non-veteran any of whose children died while 

serving in the Armed Forces. 

Approved September 30, 2010. 

Sept. 30, 2010 

[H.R. 4505] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
Second Department,

July, 1960

(July 5, 1960)

#### Atlantic Beach Hotel & Cabana Club, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Edward P. Larkin et al., Respondents.

Motion for a stay pending appeal denied, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50501

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NATHAN WELLS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-300-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Nathan Wells on appeal has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Wells has not

responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Christopher Lynn Hale, Sr., Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00003

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District Court of Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 22,153

- 2014 ). Memorandum Op inion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Christopher Lynn Hale, Sr., has adequately indicated his

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 13, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. A utrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.
     (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as
     filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), Robert C. Stempel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
     Stephan W. Zumsteg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively,
     do each hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
     2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that based on his knowledge:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
             or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


     /S/ Robert C. Stempel
     ------------------------------
     Robert C. Stempel
     Chief Executive Officer
     November 9, 2005


     /S/ Stephan W. Zumsteg
     ------------------------------
     Stephan W. Zumsteg
     Chief Financial Officer
     November 9, 2005










                                      150
Mayor Stanley A. Clouse 

City of Kearney 

18 East 22nd Street 

P. 0. Box 1180 

Kearney, N E 68848-1180 

November 5, 2014 

Michael Martin 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

400 7th Street, SW 

Washington, DC 20590 

TELEPHONE· (308) 233-3216 

. FAX · (308) 234-6399 

E~MAIL · mayor@kearneygov.org 

v;I/EBSJTE · www.cityofkearney.org 

RE: Kearney's Supporl of DEN-EAR Route Operated by Aerodynamics Inc, 

Dear Mr. Martin: 

The Essential Air Service program has been and continues to be a vital economic lifeline for communities 

across the country, and especially in rural Nebraska. The continuing growth of our local economy is 

sustainable in large part because of the air service that has been supported and connections to the national 

and international air transportation system that exist today. However, the current provider, Great Lakes 

Airlines has failed to provide reliable service for the past several months and does not meet our goal to obtain 

regional jet service. Consistent with this goal we have demonstrated our commitment by investing invested 

significant financial and staff local resources including: 

Construction projects 

• New Airport Fire Station 

• New commercial hangar 

• New terminal parking lot 

• Renovated airport terminal 

• New airport road & entrance 

Other completed items 

$2,500,000 

$1,500,000 

$ 842,000 

$1,000,000 

$1,400,000 

• Completion of the required environmental assessment 

• Completion of air service leakage study 

• Increased fire department staffing 

• Designation as a Class II airport 

Accordingly, the City of Kearney requests the selection of Aerodynamics Inc. (ADI) to provide essential air 

service for our community. The City of Kearney stands ready to assist and partner with ADI in the promotion of 

regional jet service for our community. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. 

Sincerely yours, 

CITY OF KEARNEY 

~~lQ_~ 

Stanley A Clouse 

Mayor 

SAC:sjb
#### § 751.4 Construction.

The provisions of this section and the Personnel Claims Act provide limited compensation to service members and civilian employees of the DON for loss and damage to personal property incurred incident to service. This limited compensation is not a substitute for private insurance. Although not every loss may be compensated under the Personnel Claims Act, its provisions shall be broadly construed to provide reasonable compensation on meritorious claims. Adjudications must be based on common sense and the reasoned judgment of the claims examiner giving the benefit of realistic doubt to the claimant.
#### § 536.36 Related remedies.

An ACO or a CPO routinely receives claims or inquiries about claims that clearly are not cognizable under this part. It is the DA's policy that every effort be made to discover another remedy and inform the inquirer as to its nature. Claims personnel will familiarize themselves with the remedies set forth in DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-17, to carry out this policy. If no appropriate remedy can be discovered, forward the file to the Commander USARCS, with recommendations.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 2.7
         INVESTMENT COMPENSATION AGREEMENT WITH DOLPHIN INDUSTRIES, INC.

DOLPHIN INDUSTRIES, INC., (DOLPHIN), an Oklahoma Corporation, and/or its
assigns, HEREBY AGREES to enter into an exclusive and binding agreement with
POTOMAC ENERGY CORPORATION, (POTOMAC), an Oklahoma Corporation, as compensation
for $290,000 USD of investment capital Potomac and or its assigns have provided
for the sole purpose of providing Dolphin the necessary means to pursue
ownership and operations of the Barrett Refinery located in Thomas, Oklahoma.

1.       Potomac has caused $290,000 USD to be deposited with C. David Rhodes,
         Liquidating Agent for the Barrett Refinery, for the benefit of Dolphin
         on August 2, 1999 as evidenced by the attached copy of the actual
         Cashier's Check.

2.       As compensation for the aforementioned investment, Dolphin hereby
         agrees that Potomac will have a nine percent, (9%), equity ownership in
         Dolphin. This equity ownership will become effective immediately.

3.       In accordance with Potomac's percentage of ownership, Potomac is
         entitled to receive nine percent, (9%), of the net profits generated by
         Dolphin's effort and operation in the Thomas Refinery. In the event
         that the refinery project is unsuccessful, Potomac reserves the right
         to transfer, at no cost, it's nine percent, (9%), equity stake to other
         Dolphin projects upon agreement by both parties under separate cover.

4.       Since Potomac is recognized as a minority partner to Dolphin, Potomac
         will not have any management control, unless so desired and requested
         by Dolphin. Any compensation for such services desired by Dolphin and
         provided by Potomac will be covered under a separate agreement and
         separate terms.

5.       Additionally, since Potomac is recognized as a minority partner to
         Dolphin, Potomac shall not be held liable by Dolphin or any creditor to
         Dolphin for any business failures, shortcomings, loss of income,
         profit, product, or in general, any business operation.

6.       In accordance with this agreement, Dolphin, as the majority partner,
         shall have the right to buy Potomac's interest during the next twelve
         months at two, (2), times the initial investment.

Prentice Davis, President and Manager of Dolphin Industries, with full corporate
authority, hereby does agrees this first (1) day of November 1999 to the
aforementioned terms and conditions.


For Dolphin Industries, Inc.:
/s/ PRENTICE DAVIS
------------------------------------
Prentice Davis


For Potomac Energy Corporation:
/s/ CARL W. SWAN
------------------------------------
Carl W. Swan, Chairman
#### § 536.52 Subrogation.

Subrogation is the substitution of one person in place of another with regard to a claim, demand or right. It should not be confused with a lien, which is an obligation of the claimant. Applicable state law should be researched to determine the distinction between subrogation and a lien. Subrogation claims are payable under subparts D and H, but not under subparts C, E, F or J of this part. For further discussion see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-58.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of CB Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean K. Hirata,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/  DEAN K. HIRATA
---------------------------------------------------------------
    Dean K. Hirata
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 2003
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50693 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

RODRIGO ANTONIO GONZALEZ
,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 359

- 1

Before DAVIS, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodrigo Antonio

Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez h a s not filed a re sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 17 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50693 Document: 00514432336 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2018No. 17

- 50693

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withd raw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-50693 Document: 00514432336 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2018
### §195. Punishment for violation of order

Any packer or swine contractor, or any officer, director, agent, or employee of a packer or swine contractor, who fails to obey any order of the Secretary issued under the provisions of section 193 of this title, or such order as modified—

(1) After the expiration of the time allowed for filing a petition in the court of appeals to set aside or modify such order, if no such petition has been filed within such time; or

(2) After the expiration of the time allowed for applying for a writ of certiorari, if such order, or such order as modified, has been sustained by the court of appeals and no such writ has been applied for within such time; or

(3) After such order, or such order as modified, has been sustained by the courts as provided in section 194 of this title; shall on conviction be fined not less than $500 nor more than $10,000, or imprisoned for not less than six months nor more than five years, or both. Each day during which such failure continues shall be deemed a separate offense.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title II, §205, 42 Stat. 163; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(a), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107; Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10502(b)(1), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 509.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–171 substituted "packer or swine contractor" for "packer" in two places in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1949, substituted "court of appeals" for "circuit court of appeals", wherever appearing in this section.
• Contact Us • Site Map 

### Current Projects Membership Future Projects 

# Electric Generating Utility Growth Model The electric generating utility (EGU) growth model. has been constructed to provide a cost effective m ethod for growing the electric utility component of the emissions inventory. The focus of the project is to aid in the p roduction of invenories for photochemical transport modeling. Here is an in troductory powerpoint about the model. 

### Initial Documentation Below we have included the initial documentation fo r the model.

• Implimentation Outline • Data Files Needed • Needs Control File • Ertac Implimentation Diagram • Draft Growth Rates • Executive Summary • Unit Availability File 

### Meeting Summaries LADCO Stakeholders Meeting Announcement 

### Obtaining the Model The model is running great and we expect an early s ummer release of the model and all source data. 

### Active Projects: ERTAC attempts to keep no more than 2 projects running at one time. This way we do not spread our resources too thin. Currently the two projects are Area Source Comparability EGU growth 

# Page 1 of 1 ERTAC

6/ 3/2014 http://www.ertac.us/index_egu.html
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**WILDERNESS MINERAL POTENTIAL Assessment of Mineral-Resource Potential in U.S.Forest Service Lands Studied 1964-1984
 
v1|v2 | 
 
SuDoc Number: I 19.16:1300
Item Number:0624 (online)

System Number: 001059844
April 8, 2021
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant
To 18 U.S.C. 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Jacobson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Date: June 26, 2008 |  | /s/ Andrew JacobsonAndrew Jacobson, President and Chief Executive Officer
and Director
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
### §§1736v to 1736x. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1572(3), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3702

Section 1736v, Pub. L. 99–198, title XI, §1127, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1483; Pub. L. 99–260, §6, Mar. 20, 1986, 100 Stat. 50; Pub. L. 100–418, title IV, §4306, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1398, provided for program to develop and expand markets for United States agricultural commodities.

Section 1736w, Pub. L. 99–198, title XI, §1128, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1485, provided for program of export sales of poultry, beef and pork meats and meat-food products for 1986 through 1989.

Section 1736x, Pub. L. 99–198, title XI, §1132, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1488; Pub. L. 100–418, title IV, §4307, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1398, provided for reports by agricultural attachés. See section 1748 of this title.
§ 537.16 Scope for maritime claims. The Army Maritime Claims Settlement Act (10 U.S.C. 4803-4804) applies worldwide and includes claims that arise on high seas or within the territorial waters of a foreign country. ( a ) 10 U.S.C. 4803 provides for agency settlement or compromise of claims for damage to: ( 1 ) DA-accountable properties of a kind that are within the federal maritime jurisdiction.
( 2 ) Property under the DA's jurisdiction or DA property damaged by a vessel or floating object.
( b ) 10 U.S.C. 4804 provides for the settlement or compromise of claims in any amount for salvage services (including contract salvage and towage) performed by the DA. Claims for salvage services are based upon labor cost, per diem rates for the use of salvage vessels and other equipment, and repair or replacement costs for materials and equipment damaged or lost during the salvage operation. The sum claimed is usually intended to compensate the United States for operational costs only, reserving, however, the government's right to assert a claim on a salvage bonus basis in accordance with commercial practice.
( c ) The United States has three years from the date a maritime claim accrues under this section to file suit against the responsible party or parties.
### §4508. Limitation of awards during a Presidential election year

(a) For purposes of this section, the term—

(1) "Presidential election period" means any period beginning on June 1 in a calendar year in which the popular election of the President occurs, and ending on January 20 following the date of such election; and

(2) "senior politically appointed officer" means any officer who during a Presidential election period serves—

(A) in a Senior Executive Service position and is not a career appointee as defined under section 3132(a)(4); or

(B) in a position of a confidential or policy-determining character under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

(b) No senior politically appointed officer may receive an award under the provisions of this subchapter during a Presidential election period.

(Added Pub. L. 103–425, §2(a), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4369.)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

THE COMPANY OR ONE OF ITS WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES BENEFICIALLY OWNS THE
FOLLOWING PERCENT OF THE OUTSTANDING CAPITAL STOCK, VOTING SECURITIES AND
INTERESTS OF EACH OF THE CORPORATIONS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS LISTED BELOW.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 STATE OR OTHER
                                                 JURISDICTION OF      PERCENT
NAME                                              INCORPORATION        OWNED
----                                             ---------------      -------
<S>                                              <C>                  <C>
City Bank                                             Hawaii          100.0%
     Citibank Properties, Inc.                        Hawaii           97.7%
     ISL Capital Corporation                        California        100.0%
     ISL Financial Corp.                             Virginia         100.0%
     Pacific Access Mortgage, LLC                     Hawaii           50.0%
Datatronix Financial Services, Inc.                   Hawaii          100.0%
O.R.E., Inc.                                          Hawaii          100.0%
</TABLE>

All subsidiaries were included in the consolidated financial statements of the
Registrant.
### §§12–1 to 12–3. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 12–1 to 12–3 comprised the second, third, and fourth pars., respectively, of section 8 of the Commodity Exchange Act, Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §8, 42 Stat. 1003. Such section 8 was amended generally by Pub. L. 95–405, §16, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 873, and is classified in its entirety to section 12 of this title.

Section 12–1, as added Dec. 19, 1947, ch. 523, 61 Stat. 941; amended Feb. 19, 1968, Pub. L. 90–258, §19(b), 82 Stat. 32; Oct. 23, 1974, Pub. L. 93–463, title I, §103(a), (e), (f), 88 Stat. 1392, related to disclosure of names of traders on commodity markets by Commission. See section 12(e) of this title.

Section 12–2, as added Oct. 23, 1974, Pub. L. 93–463, title I, §105, 88 Stat. 1392, required an annual report to Congress. See Codification note under section 12 of this title.

Section 12–3, as added Oct. 23, 1974, Pub. L. 93–463, title I, §105, 88 Stat. 1392, related to reviews and audits by Comptroller General. See section 12(i) of this title.
#### § 196.440 Health and insurance benefits and services.

Subject to § 196.235(d), in providing a medical, hospital, accident, or life insurance benefit, service, policy, or plan to any of its students, a recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex, or provide such benefit, service, policy, or plan in a manner that would violate §§ 196.500 through 196.550 if it were provided to employees of the recipient. This section shall not prohibit a recipient from providing any benefit or service that may be used by a different proportion of students of one sex than of the other, including family planning services. However, any recipient that provides full coverage health service shall provide gynecological care.