alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Dated May 12, 2006



Commission File Number: 001-14666



MITTAL STEEL COMPANY N.V.

(Translation of registrants name into English)



15th Floor, Hofplein 20

3032 AC Rotterdam

The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-FxForm 40-Fo



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



YesoNox



If Yes marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________





















---









On May 12, 2006, Mittal Steel Company N.V. issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.



Exhibit List



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                          | 
|------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated May 12, 2006, announcing Mittal Steel Company N.V.s first quarter 2006 results.























| | 2 | 
| | - | 





---









SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: May 12, 2006



| | By: | /s/Henk Scheffer
| | --- | ----------------
| |     | Name:           
| |     | Title:          















| | 3 | 
| | - | 





---













Exhibit Index



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                          | 
|------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated May 12, 2006, announcing Mittal Steel Company N.V.s first quarter 2006 results.











| | 4 | 
| | - |
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 114TH DISTRIC T COURT OF SMITH COU NTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 2nd
day of September, 2015 , the caus e upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

TONYA ALLEN DDS, P.A

. , Appellant

NO. 12

- 15

- 00029

- CV; Trial Court No. 14

- 1121

- B

Opinion by Bill Bass, Justice.

SMITH COUNTY APPRAIS AL DISTRICT, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court

below be in all things affirmed , and that all costs of this appeal are hereby adjudged against the appellant, TONYA ALLEN DDS, P.A

., for which execution may issue, and that this decision be

certified to the court belo w for observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T . WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the 13 th day of November , 2015.

PAM ESTES , CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Cl erk
#### STATE v. FLOWERS

No. 553A94

Case below: Rowan County Superior Court

Motion by defendant (Flowers) to dismiss counsel and abandon appeal is remanded 4 December 1997 to Superior Court for a hearing on defendant’s motion.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Panhandle Royalty Company
5400 North Grand Blvd. Suite #210
Oklahoma City, OK 73112

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, H W Peace II, Chief Executive Officer of Panhandle Royalty
Company, (the Company), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, hereby certify in connection with the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period that ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ HW Peace II  HW Peace II
President &
Chief Executive Officer

December 18, 2003

(60)
§ 723.10 Settlement of claims. ( a ) *Authority.* ( 1 ) The Department of the Navy is authorized under 10 U.S.C. 1552 to pay claims for amounts due to applicants as a result of corrections to their naval records.
( 2 ) The Department of the Navy is not authorized to pay any claim heretofore compensated by Congress through enactment of a private law, or to pay any amount as compensation for any benefit to which the claimant might subsequently become entitled under the laws and regulations administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
( b ) *Application for settlement.* ( 1 ) Settlement and payment of claims shall be made only upon a claim of the person whose record has been corrected or legal representative, heirs at law, or beneficiaries. Such claim for settlement and payment may be filed as a separate part of the application for correction of the record.
( 2 ) When the person whose record has been corrected is deceased, and where no demand is presented by a duly appointed legal representative of the estate, payments otherwise due shall be made to the surviving spouse, heir or beneficiaries, in the order prescribed by the law applicable to that kind of payment, or if there is no such law covering order of payment, in the order set forth in 10 U.S.C. 2771; or as otherwise prescribed by the law applicable to that kind of payment.
( 3 ) Upon request, the applicant or applicants shall be required to furnish requisite information to determine their status as proper parties to the claim for purposes of payment under applicable provisions of law.
( c ) *Settlement.* ( 1 ) Settlement of claims shall be upon the basis of the decision and recommendation of the Board, as approved by the Secretary or his designee. Computation of the amounts due shall be made by the appropriate disbursing activity. In no case will the amount found due exceed the amount which would otherwise have been paid or have become due under applicable laws had no error or injustice occurred. Earnings received from civilian employment, self employment or any income protection plan for such employment during any period for which active duty pay and allowances are payable will be deducted from the settlement. To the extent authorized by law and regulation, amounts found due may be reduced by the amount of any existing indebtedness to the Government arising from military service.
( 2 ) Prior to or at the time of payment, the person or persons to whom payments are to be made shall be advised by the disbursing activity of the nature and amount of the various benefits represented by the total settlement and shall be advised further that acceptance of such settlement shall constitute a complete release by the claimants involved of any claim against the United States on account of the correction of the record.
( d ) *Report of settlement.* In every case where payment is made, the amount of such payment and the names of the payee or payees shall be reported to the Executive Director.
### **CHAPTER 49—CONSULTATION ON AGRICULTURAL PROGRAMS**

Sec.
1911.
Consultation of Secretary of Agriculture with farmers, farm and commodity organizations and other persons and organizations; travel and per diem expenses.
1912.
Submission of legislative proposals.
1913.
Authority of Secretary of Agriculture under other provisions of law and to establish and consult with advisory committees.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 162 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 162

     Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on House 
         Administration in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2023

Mr. Steil submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on House 
         Administration in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on House Administration 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $15,307,290 for the One 
Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $7,405,638 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2023, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2024; and
            (2) not more than $7,901,652 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2024, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2025.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. DA 23-0229 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

HALIE MARIA HERZOG, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

GRANT 

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until December 6, 2023, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's opening brief. 

10/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0229
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Sasol Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending 30 June 2018, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



Date:
27 August 2018



By:

/s/ BONGANI NQWABABA Bongani Nqwababa Joint President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ STEPHEN CORNELL Stephen Cornell Joint President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:
27 August 2018



By:

/s/ PAUL VICTOR Paul Victor Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Sasol Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even if the document with which it is
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.

---



QuickLinks
From: McKaughan, Colleen 

Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:36 PM 

To: Gary.Bohnee@SRPMIC-nsn.gov

Cc: Martz, Verle; Webb, Thomas; Nudd, Gregory 

Subject: Consultation with Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC) 

Dear Mr. Bohnee, 

I believe I left you a voicemail on this topic several days ago. I wanted to follow up on the SRPMIC's 

request for consultation regarding EPA's proposed action on the Arizona Regional Haze SIP. We would 

be glad to meet with you and other representatives of the Tribe at your convenience. 

We have extended the public comment period in response to several requests, including the Tribe's, and 

the public comment period now extends to March 6, 2013. We have provided Mr. Martz with the draft 

information prepared by our contractor. We are reviewing the contractor information internally but would 

be interested in any discrepancies noted by SRPMIC or Phoenix Cement. 

Please let me know when you would like consultation to take place. Thank you very much. 

Colleen W. McKaughan 

Associate Director, Air Division 

USEPA, Region 9 

(520) 498-0118
131 STAT. 2282 PUBLIC LAW 115–116—JAN. 12, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 954: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–203 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

July 11, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–116 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred to Rockingham County, 

Virginia, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION. 

Public Law 101–479 (104 Stat. 1158) is amended— 

(1) by striking section 2(d); and 

(2) by adding the following new section at the end: 

‘‘SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION. 

‘‘(a) The approximately 1-acre portion of the land referred to 

in section 3 that is used for purposes of a child care center, as 

authorized by this Act, shall not be subject to the use restriction 

imposed in the deed referred to in section 3. 

‘‘(b) Upon enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior 

shall execute an instrument to carry out subsection (a).’’. 

Approved January 12, 2018. 

Jan. 12, 2018 

[H.R. 954]
July 18, 2016

Mr. Matthew Wendeln

1963 West Argyle Street, # 3

Chicago, IL 60640

Dear Wendeln:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your February 7, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2016-

3976), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brandon Roberts

Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3

Project No.: AFS-16-8499-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-101:KJones:7/18/2016:Doc# 63972

ARM-1/100/101:Program Office AFS-200
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

136962 (34) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

JOHN H. RAY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136962 

 COA: 281591 

TODD R. PERKINS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $16.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$359.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

Clerk
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-18-00432-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 6

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1453917

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Bassel and Womack, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

NOLBERTA LOUISE VARGAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Nolberta Louise Vargas appeals her conviction for Class B 

misdemeanor driving while intoxicated, enhanced by one prior felony, for which she 

was sentenced to 100 days in Tarrant County Jail. In a single issue, Vargas argues that 

the trial court erred by denying her pretrial motion to suppress evidence of an 

electronic scale discovered during a search of her purse. The State responds that the 

correctness of the trial court’s pretrial ruling denying Vargas’s motion to suppress was 

rendered moot when later, during the trial, the trial court sustained her hearsay 

objection to the testimony relating to the scale. We agree with the State that the

record does not reflect that any testimony related to the scale was offered or admitted 

at trial. We therefore overrule Vargas’s sole issue as moot and affirm the trial court’s 

judgment. See Long v. State, 525 S.W.3d 351, 368 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 

2017, pet. ref’d) (holding that appellant’s argument challenging the trial court’s denial 

of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during the search of his residence was 

moot because none of the items seized was offered or admitted at trial).

/s/ Dabney Bassel

Dabney Bassel

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: July 3, 2019
Editorial Note on Part 816
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 816 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 816.87 Coal mine waste: Burning and burned waste utilization. ( a ) Coal mine waste fires shall be extinguished by the person who conducts the surface mining activities, in accordance with a plan approved by the regulatory authority and the Mine Safety and Health Administration. The plan shall contain, at a minimum, provisions to ensure that only those persons authorized by the operator, and who have an understanding of the procedures to be used, shall be involved in the extinguishing operations.
( b ) No burning or burned coal mine waste shall be removed from a permitted disposal area without a removal plan approved by the regulatory authority. Consideration shall be given to potential hazards to persons working or living in the vicinity of the structure.
[48 FR 44029, Sept. 26, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017]
### §§1445b, 1445b–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–624, title III, §301(1), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3382

Section 1445b, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title I, §107A, as added Sept. 29, 1977, Pub. L. 95–113, title IV, §§401, 402, 91 Stat. 921, 924; amended Mar. 18, 1980, Pub. L. 96–213, §§3, 4(d), 94 Stat. 119, 120; Sept. 26, 1980, Pub. L. 96–365, title II, §201(d), 94 Stat. 1320; Dec. 3, 1980, Pub. L. 96–494, title II, §202(b), 94 Stat. 2570, related to loan rates and target prices for the 1977 through 1981 crops of wheat.

Section 1445b–1, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title I, §107B, as added Dec. 22, 1981, Pub. L. 97–98, title III, §301, 95 Stat. 1221; Sept. 8, 1982, Pub. L. 97–253, title I, §§121, 122, 96 Stat. 768; amended Sept. 29, 1983, Pub. L. 98–100, §1(b), 97 Stat. 718; Apr. 10, 1984, Pub. L. 98–258, title I, §§101–103, 98 Stat. 130, 131, related to loan rates and target prices for 1982 through 1985 wheat crops.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective beginning with 1991 crop of an agricultural commodity, with provision for prior crops, see section 1171 of Pub. L. 101–624, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 1421 of this title.