alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1138 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to deny certain privileges 

of the House of Representatives to former Members who have been 

expelled from the House, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2024 

Mr. D’ESPOSITO (for himself, Mr. LALOTA, and Mr. LAWLER) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

deny certain privileges of the House of Representatives 

to former Members who have been expelled from the 

House, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Upholding the 

4 Integrity of Our Institution Resolution’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1138 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DENYING ADMISSION TO HALL OF THE HOUSE TO 

2 FORMER MEMBERS WHO HAVE BEEN EX3 PELLED. 

4 Clause 4(a) of rule IV of the Rules of the House of 

5 Representatives is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

7 (3); 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub9 paragraph (4) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(5) has been expelled from the House.’’. 

13 SEC. 3. BENEFITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED TO CERTAIN 

14 FORMER MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REP15 RESENTATIVES. 

16 Rule XXIX of the Rules of the House of Representa17 tives is amended by adding at the end the following new 

18 clause: 

19 ‘‘5. In the case of a former Member, Delegate, or 

20 Resident Commissioner who has been expelled from the 

21 House of Representatives, such Member, Delegate, or 

22 Resident Commissioner may not retain possession of a 

23 Member pin after such expulsion and no benefit or service 

24 of the House shall be made available to such former Mem25 ber, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, including any of 

26 the following: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1138 IH 

1 ‘‘(a) Access to the floor of the House. 

2 ‘‘(b) Access to athletic facilities and other facili3 ties available for the use of Members of the House. 

4 ‘‘(c) Access to the Members’ Dining Room lo5 cated in the House of Representatives wing of the 

6 United States Capitol. 

7 ‘‘(d) Access to parking spaces. 

8 ‘‘(e) Access to material from the House docu9 ment room. 

10 ‘‘(f) Use of the collections in the House Legisla11 tive Resource Center without borrowing privileges. 

12 ‘‘(g) Short-term franking privileges. 

13 ‘‘(h) Access to materials through the Congres14 sional Research Service and the Library of Con15 gress.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16

- 1682 Filed July 19, 2017
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs. TERENCE LONDON WALKER , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, George L. Stigler , Judge.

Terence Walker challenge s by writ of certiorari the denial of his motion to correct an illegal senten ce. WRIT ANNULLED.

Mark C. Smith , State Appellate Defender, and Robert P. Ranschau , Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Louis S. Sloven , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Tabor and Mullins, JJ.2

MULLINS, Judge. A jury found Terrence Walker guilty of robbery in the second degree and burglary in the second degree. In 2014, he was sentenced to indeterminate prison terms of ten years on each offense, t o be served concurrently, requiring he serve a mandatory minimum of seventy percent before parole eligibility on the robbery conviction

. On August 12, 2016, Walker filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence, claiming , under legislation effective July 1 , 2016, his conviction

— and therefore his sentence

— should be for robbery in the third degree. The State resisted, and the district court denied the motion without setting it for a hearing. Walker appealed the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, arguing counsel was ineffective in not ensuring Walker had the benefit of a hearing on his motion and t hat denial of his motion without an evidentiary hearing was a denial of due process. 1 See State v. Ondayog , 722 N.W.2d 778, 784 (Iowa 2006) (“Ineffective

- assistance

- of

- counsel claims are not bound by traditional error

- preservation rules.”). Our supreme court treated his appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and granted the petition. See State v. Propps , ___ N.W.2d

___ , ___, 2017 WL 2291380 , at *3 (Iowa 2017) (“[I]f a case is initiated by a notice of appeal, but another form of review is proper, we may choose to proceed as though the proper form of review was requested by the defendant rather than dismiss the action. ”)

. Walker argues that at an evidentiary hearing he

1 “Normally, ineffective

- assistance

- of

- counsel claims are considered in postconviction relief proceedings.” State v. Vance , 790 N.W.2d 775, 785 (Iowa 2010). When , as here, the record is sufficient to address an ineffective

- assistance

- of

- counsel claim, we r esolve the claim on direct appeal. Id.3

would have had the opportunity to develop facts to support his motion. But his brief on appeal does not identify any facts that would have or should have been presented and cites no legal authority that the legislature’s adoption of robbery in the third degree requires reduction of his robbery conviction or reduction of his sentence. His argument that he was denied due process requires

— at the very least

— he assert that provision of a greater process woul d have the potential to benefit him in obtaining his requested relief

. Pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(a) and (e), we annul the writ.
WRIT AN N ULLED.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY - - 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

SEF 1 7 2003 

SEP 1 1 2008 

Carol A. Couch, Ph.D., Director 

Georgia Environmental Protection Division 

Suite 1152, East Tower 

Two Martin Luther King Jr. Drive 

Atlanta, Georgia 30334 

RECEIVED 

OCT 2 3 2008 

AIR PROTECTION BRANCH 

Dear Dr. Couch: 

Thank you for your August 19,2008, letter and the September 8,2008, email concerning 

the application of the new Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments 

(IMPROVE) equation. The September 8,2008, email provided additional documentation for the 

enclosures in your letter. You requested approval to use this new methodology to estimate 

visibility impacts from two Georgia facilities to implement the Best Available Retrofit 

Technology requirement of the Regional Haze Rule. 

The new methodology uses a spreadsheet developed by the Visibility Improvement - State 

and Tribal Association of the Southeast to post-process the visibility modeling output from the 

CALPUFF and CALPOST models. The spreadsheet implements the new IMPROVE equation for 

calculating visibility impacts that was adopted by the IMPROVE Steering Committee in December 

2005. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 has previously provided comments 

indicating that new methodology is an alternative modeling approach and should meet the 

requirements in Section 3.2 of Appendix W, Guideline on Air Quality Models contained in 

40 C.F.R. Part 5 1. We have reviewed your demonstration for using the new methodology, which 

includes a rationale for the need to use the new IMPROVE equation, a discussion of the 

performance of the equation versus measured values, a submittal of the modified post-processing 

methodology, and documentation to support the development of concentrations for the different 

terms in the equation. Based on ths Oemo~stration provided in your letter, we approve your 

request. 

We appreciate your desire to protect and preserve the environment. If we may be of 

further assistance, please contact me or have a member of your staff contact Beverly Banister, 

Director of the Region 4 Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, at (404) 562-9077. 

Sincerely, 

d-. J. I. Palmer, Jr. 

Regional Administrator 

Internet Address (URL) http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable -Printed wilh Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
§ 536.32 Transfer of claims among armed services branches. ( a ) Claims filed with the wrong federal agency, or claims that should be adjudicated by receiving State offices under NATO or other SOFA, will be immediately transferred to the proper agency together with notice of same to the claimant or legal representative. Where multiple federal agencies are involved, other agencies will be contacted and a lead agency established to take all actions on the claim. Where the DA is the lead agency, any final action will include other agencies. Similarly, where another agency is the lead agency, that agency will be requested to include DA in any final action. Such inclusion will prevent multiple dates for filing suit or appeal.
( b ) If another agency has taken denial action on a claim that involves the DA, without informing the DA, and in which the DA desires to make a payment, the denial action may be reconsidered by the DA not later than six months from the date of mailing and payment made thereafter.
Note to § 536.32 :
See also §§ 536.17 and 536.18; AR 27-20, paragraph 13-2; and the parallel and related discussion of this topic at DA Pam 27-162, paragraphs 1-19, 1-20, 2-13 and 13-2.
### §1611. Illegal sales of uncertified seed

It shall be unlawful in the United States or in interstate or foreign commerce to sell or offer for sale or advertise, by variety name, seed not certified by an official seed certifying agency, when it is a variety for which a certificate of plant variety protection under the Plant Variety Protection Act [7 U.S.C. 2321 et seq.] specifies sale only as a class of certified seed: Provided, That seed from a certified lot may be labeled as to variety name when used in a mixture by, or with the approval of, the owners of the variety.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title V, §501, as added Pub. L. 91–577, title III, §142(a), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1558; amended Pub. L. 97–98, title XI, §1118, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1272.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Plant Variety Protection Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–577, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1542, which is classified principally to chapter 57 (§2321 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2321 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–98 substituted "sell or offer for sale or advertise, by variety name, seed" for "sell by variety name seed", "certifying agency, when" for "certifying agency when", and "owners of the variety" for "owner of the variety".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–98 effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4301 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 24, 1970, see section 141 of Pub. L. 91–577, set out as a note under section 2321 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #16485 and #16486; CALIFORNIA Disaster Number CA-00319]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of California dated 06/17/2020.

*Incident:*                         Civil Unrest.                    

*Incident Period:*                         05/26/2020 to 12/28/2020.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 12/30/2020.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/16/2020.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/17/2021.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an Administrative declaration for the State of California, dated 06/17/2020, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 05/26/2020 and continuing through 12/28/2020.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Jovita Carranza,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2021-00169 Filed 1-7-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

MEMORANDUM

TO: Director, Institute of Education Sciences

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Authority to Designate an Employee to Serve as the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) for 

the National Board for Education Sciences (NBES)

I. DELEGATION

By the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 

U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you, or anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or delegated 

to perform the functions and duties of your position, the authority to designate an employee to serve 

as and carry out the duties of the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) for the National Board for 

Education Sciences (NBES), as set forth in 41 C.F.R. §§ 102-3.25 (definition of the term 

“Designated Federal Officer”), 102-3.105(i), and 102-3.120 and Sections 10(e) and (f) of the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the existing authorities 

delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following is not delegated:

The authority to appoint, and to fix the compensation of, members of an advisory committee.

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to the requirements of law, you may redelegate any of the authority delegated to you in this 

delegation and authorize further redelegation. Any redelegation must be done in accordance with the 

Administrative Communications System directive, ACSD-OFO-015, Delegation of Authority, dated 

August 26, 2016.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE 

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations Control 

Officer. I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification.

_________/s_____________ 

Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D.

OGC Concurrence and Date: Debbie Friendly, 10/7/2022

Control Number: EA/ER/118

Certification Date: 10/7/2022

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: 10/7/2022
§ 28.600 Semi-annual compilation. ( a ) The head of each agency shall collect and compile the disclosure reports (see appendix B) and, on May 31 and November 30 of each year, submit to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives a report containing a compilation of the information contained in the disclosure reports received during the six-month period ending on March 31 or September 30, respectively, of that year.
( b ) The report, including the compilation, shall be available for public inspection 30 days after receipt of the report by the Secretary and the Clerk.
( c ) Information that involves intelligence matters shall be reported only to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( d ) Information that is classified under Executive Order 12356 or any successor order shall be reported only to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives (whichever such committees have jurisdiction of matters involving such information) and to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( e ) The first semi-annual compilation shall be submitted on May 31, 1990, and shall contain a compilation of the disclosure reports received from December 23, 1989 to March 31, 1990.
( f ) Major agencies, designated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), are required to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives no later than with the compilations due on May 31, 1991. OMB shall provide detailed specifications in a memorandum to these agencies.
( g ) Non-major agencies are requested to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.
( h ) Agencies shall keep the originals of all disclosure reports in the official files of the agency.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Quixote Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:



|Date: |  | February 8, 2008 | /s/LESLIE J. JEZUITLeslie J. Jezuit, Chief Executive
Officer
|----- |  | ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | February 8, 2008 | /s/DANIEL P. GOREYDaniel P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer  

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure.

1

---



QuickLinks
from April 2,2009, through May 1 1,2009. 

The attainment demonstration documents that the Hickory and Greensboro/WinstonSalem/High Point areas will attain the 1997 fine particulate matter national ambient air quality 

standard, fulfilling requirements of Section 172(c), 182(a) and 182(b) of the Federal Clean Air 

Act as amended. Enclosed is the complete package containing the narrative and all of the 

appendices with the supporting documentation and the complete public notice record. 

I am requesting that the system-wide emission caps from the North Carolina Clean 

Smokestacks Act (CSA) be incorporated into the North Carolina Federally Approved State 

Implementation Plan. The language from the CSA to be incorporated is in the attachment to this 

letter. I respectfully request that you commence the federal approval process for the North 

Carolina fine particulate matter attainment demonstration and incorporation of the CSA systemwide emission caps. 

1641 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1641 

2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604 

Phone: 919-733-3340 \ FAX: 919-71 5-7175 \ Internet: www.daq.state.nc.us1 

An Equal Opportunity \ Affirma!ive Action Employer 

(d) An investor-owned public utility that owns or operates coal-fired generating units that 

collectively emitted more than 225,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (S02) in calendar year 2000: 

(1) Shall not collectively emit from the coal-fired generating units that it owns or 

operates more than 150,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (S02) in any calendar year 

beginning 1 January 2009. 

(2) Shall not collectively emit from the coal-fired generating units that it owns or 

operates more than 80,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (S02) in any calendar year 

beginning 1 January 20 1 3. 

(e) An investor-owned public utility that owns or operates coal-fired generating units that 

collectively emitted 225,000 tons or less of sulfur dioxide (S02) in calendar year 2000: 

(1) Shall not collectively emit from the coal-fired generating units that it owns or 

operates more than 100,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (S02) in any calendar year 

beginning 1 January 2009. 

(2) Shall not collectively emit from the coal-fired generating units that it owns or 

operates more than 50,000 tons of sulk dioxide (S02) in any calendar year 

beginning 1 January 20 13.
### §1639r. Regulations and guidelines; effect on other law

#### (a) Promulgation of regulations and guidelines; report

#### (1) Regulations and guidelines

#### (A) In general

The Secretary shall promulgate regulations and guidelines to implement this subchapter as expeditiously as practicable.

#### (B) Consultation with Attorney General

The Secretary shall consult with the Attorney General on the promulgation of regulations and guidelines under subparagraph (A).

#### (2) Report

The Secretary shall annually submit to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate a report containing updates on the implementation of this subchapter.

#### (b) Authority

Subject to subsection (c)(3)(B), the Secretary shall have sole authority to promulgate Federal regulations and guidelines that relate to the production of hemp, including Federal regulations and guidelines that relate to the implementation of sections 1639p and 1639q of this title.

#### (c) Effect on other law

Nothing in this subchapter shall affect or modify—

(1) the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.);

(2) section 262 of title 42; or

(3) the authority of the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and the Secretary of Health and Human Services—

(A) under—

(i) the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.); or

(ii) section 262 of title 42; or

(B) to promulgate Federal regulations and guidelines that relate to the production of hemp under the Act described in subparagraph (A)(i) or the section described in subparagraph (A)(ii).

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title II, §297D, as added Pub. L. 115–334, title X, §10113, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4913.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(1), (3)(A)(i), is act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, which is classified generally to chapter 9 (§301 et seq.) of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 301 of Title 21 and Tables.
#### BIGGERS v. JOHN HANCOCK MUT. LIFE INS. CO.

No. 459P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 199

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997.
#### §§ 1807.152-1807.159 [Reserved]