AlllDD TflTTST

fMBS

PUBLICATIONS

NATL INST OF STANDARDS & TECH R.I.C.

A1 11 00989759

/NBS monograph

QC100 .U556 V142;1974 C.2 NBS-PUB-C 1959

.;'V i'; ^> It; ^.^ 1: t

U.$, CXEP^I^TMENJ WCOWIMER<iE;/ Natiariai; Bureau of Standards

ICO

M55io

I<t7«f



JUL 3 0 1974.

750085- ' ^

THE MEASUREMENT OF NOISE PERFORMANCE FACTORS:

A METROLOGY GUIDE

M. G. Arthur

Electromagnetic Metrology Information Center

Electromagnetics Division

Institute for Basic Standards

f / -V , National Bureau of Standards

' Boulder, Colorado 80302

W. J. Anson

Editor, Metrology Guides

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Frederick B. Dent, Secretary

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Richard W. Roberts, Director

Issued June 1974
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Arthur, M. G. The Measurement of Noise Performance Factors.

(NBS Monograph 142)

Supt. of Docs. No.: C13.44:142

1. Noise. 2. Noise—Measurement. I. Title. II. Series: United States. National Bureau of Standards. Monograph 142.

QC100.U556 No. 142 [QC228.21 389'.08s [534'.42] 74-7439

National Bureau of Standards Monograph 142

Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), Monogr. 142, 202 pages (June 1974)

CODEN: NBSMA6

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON: 1974

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402

(Order by SD Catalog No. C13.44:142). Price $5.45

Stock Number 0303-01290
ABSTRACT

This metrology guide provides the basis for critical comparisons among seven

measurement techniques for average noise factor and effective input noise temperature. The techniques that are described, discussed, and analyzed include

the (1) Y-Factor, (2) 3-dB, (3) Automatic, (4) Gain Control, (5) CW,

(6) Tangential, and (7) Comparison Techniques. The analyses yield working

equations and error equations by which accuracy capabilities are compared.

Each technique is also analyzed for (a) frequency range for best measurement

results, (b) special instrumentation requirements, (c) speed and convenience, ,

(d) operator skill required, and (e) special measurement problems. General

instrumentation requirements and practical measurement problems are discussed

for the benefit of the non-expert metrologist. Worked examples illustrate the

principles involved in applying the working and error equations. An extensive

bibliography and suggested reading list aid the metrologist to locate additional

material on these measurements. Taken altogether, this guide will be helpful in

selecting the best measurement technique for any of a wide range of operational

requirements and, once the technique is selected, it will be of further benefit

in helping the metrologist identify where his efforts should be placed to

derive the greatest efficiency and accuracy from his measurement system.

KEY WORDS

Effective input noise temperature; measurement errors; noise factor;

noise measurements; noise performance factors; noise temperature;

Y-factor measurements.

ill
EDITOR'S NOTE

This Guide is one of a series of Metrology Guides sponsored by The Electromagnetic

Metrology Information Center of the National Bureau of Standards Electromagnetics

Division designed to be critical comparisons of measurement methods for a variety

of electromagnetic quantities. The objective is to provide guidance in the

selection, use and evaluation of methods for a particular application. These

Guides, written by measurement specialists and based on extensive literature

searches, are tailored to the needs of technical people who may not possess

specialized training in the measurement of the quantity that is the subject of a particular guide. Therefore, these Guides will be useful to teachers, design

engineers, contract monitors, and practicing metrologists , as well as general

engineers and scientists who need specific measurement know-how but do not have

the time or facilities to do their own research and study on the complexities

involved. With the above objective in mind, each guide includes the following:

1. A description of the physical principles underlying the

measurement technique.

2. An indication of the accuracy obtainable with each method

whether by discussion of typical ranges and accuracies

or through discussion of the error equations

3. A discussion of the technical strengths and weaknesses of

each technique. This includes a discussion of the sources

of error or, wherever possible, the error equations of

specific operating systems.

4. A discussion of the instrumentation requirements (including

standards) for each technique.

5. Operational problems, suggestions, or examples.

6. An extensive bibliography to assist the reader in

pursuing the details of methods beyond the depth of

the guide.

If the reader wishes to receive information about any future Guides or wishes to

comment on this Guide, please use the form at the back of the book.

W. J. Anson

Editor - Metrology Guide Series

iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENT

My sincere appreciation goes to the following persons for their contributions

to this Guide. Wilbur J. Anson provided much guidance, assistance, and encouragement throughout the long process from conception to birth of this Guide.

Margaret Woolley typed the manuscript with much dedication to the task.

Illustrations were drawn by Nick Sanchez. The manuscript was read by Drs

William D. McCaa, Robert A. Kamper and Charles H. Manney for technical accuracy.

Finally, this Guide could not have been produced without the commitment and

support of Dr. R. C. Sangster, Chief of the Electromagnetics Division, NBS

V
CONTENTS

Page

LIST OF FIGURES xi

LIST OF TABLES xi

ABSTRACT iii

EDITOR'S NOTE iv

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 5

2.1. Average Noise Factor 5

2.2. Average Effective Input Noise Temperature 10

2.3. Noise Bandwidth 13

2.4. Transducer Linearity 14

3. MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES 15

3.1. Y-Factor Technique 16

3.1.1. Power Meter Method 16

3.1.2. Attenuator Method 21

3.2. 3-dB Technique 24

3.2.1. Variable Source Method 25

3.2.2. Fixed Source Method 28

3.3. Automatic (ANFM) Technique 31

3.4. Gain Control Technique 33

3.4.1. Variable Source Method 3 4 3.4.2. Fixed Source Method 37

3.5. CW Technique 40

3.6. Tangential Technique 44

3.7. Comparison Technique... 48

vi
Contents (Continued)

Page

4. INSTRUMENTATION 52

4.1. Noise Generators 52

4.1.1. General Features 52

4.1.1.1. Thermal Noise Generators 52

4.1.1.2. Shot Noise Generators 54

4.1.1.3. Plasma (Gas Discharge) Noise

Generators 58

4.1.2. Important Characteristics 58

4.1.2.1. Accuracy 58

4.1.2.2. Output Level 59

4.1.2.3. Frequency Range 60

4.1.2.4. Stability 60

4.2. CW Signal Generators 61

4.3. Power Meters 62

4.3.1. True Power 62

4.3.2. Accuracy 62

4.3.3. Sensitivity 62

4.3.4. Bandwidth 6 3

4.4. Signal Level Indicators 6 3

4.5. Attenuators 6 3

4.5.1. Precision Variable Attenuators 6 3

4.5.1.1. Accuracy 6 3 4.5.1.2. Range 64

4.5.1.3. Bandwidth 6 4 4.5.2. Precision Fixed Attenuators 6 4

4.6. Amplifiers 65

4.6.1. Gain 65

4.6.2. Dynamic Range 65

4.6.3. Noise Factor 65

4.6.4. Bandwidth 66

4.7. : Filters 66

4.7.1. Pre-Detection Filters 66

4.7.2. Post-Detection Filters 6 8

vii
Contents (Continued)

Page

4.8. Impedance Bridge/Reflectometer 6 8

5. PRACTICAL MEASUREMENT PROBLEMS 70

5.1. Source Impedance 70

5.2. Input Termination Temperature 71

5.3. TLD Frequency Correction 72

5.4. Non-Linearity 72

5.5. Leakage and Shielding 73

5.6. Spurious Responses 74

5.7. System Gain 76

5.7.1. Gain 76

5.7.2. Dynamic Range 76

5.7.3. Noise Factor 76

5.7.4. Frequency Response 80

5.7.5. Input Impedance •. 81

5.7.6. Spurious Generation of Signals 81

5.8. Gain Stability 81

5.9. Connectors and Cables • 82

5.9.1. Connectors 82

5.9.2. Cables and Waveguide 83

5.10. Detection 83

5.10.1. Built-in Detectors 83

5.10.2. External Detectors 84

5.11. Cooled Networks 85

5.12. Multiport Transducers 85

vlii
Contents (Continued) Page

6. WORKING EQUATIONS 88

6.1. Y-Factor Technique (Idealized Conditions) 8 8

6.1.1. Power Meter Method 88

6.1.2. Attenuator Method 9 3

6.2. 3-dB Technique (Idealized Conditions) 96

6.2.1. Variable Source Method 96

6.2.2. Fixed Source Method 99

6.3. Automatic Technique (Idealized Conditions) 102

6.4. Gain Control Technique (Idealized Conditions) 105

6.4.1. Variable Source Method 105

6.4.2. Fixed Source Method 10 8

6.5. CW Technique (Idealized Conditions) Ill

6.6. Tangential Technique (Idealized Conditions) 113

6.7. Comparison Technique (Idealized Conditions) 117

7. MEASUREMENT ERRORS 122

7.1. Y-Factor Technique 122

7.1.1. Power Meter Method 122

7.1.2. Attenuator Method 123

7.2. 3-dB Technique 124

7.2.1. Variable Source Method 12 4

7.2.2. Fixed Source Method 125

7.3. Automatic Technique 126

7.4. Gain Control Technique 127

7.4.1. Variable Source Method 127

7.4.2. Fixed Source Method 129

ix
Contents (Continued) Page

7.5. CW Technique 129

7.6. Tangential Technique 130

7.7. Comparison Technique 131

8. MEASUREMENT EXAMPLES 133

8.1. Y-Factor/Power Meter Method 135

8.2. Y-Factor/Attenuator Method 136

8.3. 3-dB/Variable Source Method 13 8

8.4. 3-dB/Fixed Source Method 141

8.5. Automatic Technique 143

8.6. Gain Control/Variable Source Method 146

8.7. Gain Control/Fixed Source Method 148

8.8. CW Technique 150

8.9. Tangential Technique 153

8.10. Comparison Technique 155

9. APPENDICES 158

Appendix A. Definition of Terms 158

Appendix B. Treatment of Errors 165

Appendix C. Measurement of Noise Bandwidth 168

10. SUGGESTED READING 174

11. REFERENCES 175

12. BIBLIOGRAPHY 180

12.1 Measurement Techniques 180

12.2 Noise Sources 181

12.3 General Noise Topics 184

X
LIST OF FIGURES

Page

Figure 1. Effect of Transducer Noise on Signal-to-noise Ratio.

Basis for Noise Factor, F 3

Figure 2. Effect of Transducer Noise on Total Output Noise Power.

Basis for Effective Input Noise Temperature, T^ 4

Figure 3. D. O. North's Concept of F 6

Figure 4. H. T. Friis ' Concept of F 7

Figure 5. IEEE's Concept of F 8

Figure 6. IEEE's Concept of 11

Figure 7. Y-Factor/Power Meter Method 19

Figure 8. Y-Factor/Attenuator Method 22

Figure 9. 3-dB/Variable Source Method 26

Figure 10. 3-dB/Fixed Source Method 29

Figure 11. Automatic (ANFM) Technique 32

Figure 12. Gain Control/Variable Source Method 35

Figure 13. Gain Control/Fixed Source Method 38

Figure 14. CW Technique 41

Figure 15. Tangential Technique 45

Figure 16. Oscilloscope Display of the "Tangential Pattern" 46

Figure 17. Comparison Technique 49

Figure 18. Variation of Correction Factor, <(), With Frequency

For a Plane-Parallel Diode 56

Figure 19. Possible Locations For Pre-Detection Filters 67

Figure 20. Two Cascaded Twoport Transducers 77

xi
List of Figures (Continued)

Page

Figure 21. Y-Factor/Power Meter Method for a Multiport Transducer 86

Figure 22. Y-Factor/Power Meter Method 91

Figure 23. Y-Factor/Attenuator Method 94

Figure 24. 3-dB/Variable Source Method 97

Figure 25. 3-dB/Fixed Source Method 100

Figure 26. Automatic (ANFM) Method 10 3

Figure 27. Gain Control/Variable Source Method 106

Figure 28. Gain Control/Fixed Source Method 109

Figure 29. CW Technique 112

Figure 30. Tangential Technique 114

Figure 31. Comparison Technique 118

Figure 32. Ideal (fictional) Gain Function 169

Figure 33. Typical Gain Function 170

LIST OF TABLES

Table I. Summary of Characteristics of Measurement Techniques 17

Table II. Summary of Noise Generator Characteristics 53

Table III. Summary of Working Equations 89

Table IV. Summary of Measurement Examples for Ten Measurement

Techniques 134

xii
The Measurement of Noise Performance Factors

A Metrology Guide

1 . INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this guide is to describe, discuss, and analyze methods of

measuring the average noise factor and average effective input noise temperature

of an electronic transducer-^ . Noise factor is a measure of the degree to which

a transducer degrades the signal-to-noise ratio of an incoming waveform. Every

signal source supplies both signal power and noise power, and therefore its output waveform has a signal-to-noise ratio (see figure 1) . Real-world transducers

add noise, thus producing an output waveform having a poorer signal-to-noise

ratio. Effective input noise temperature is a measure of how much noise power

the transducer adds to its input signal (see figure 2) . Further discussion of,

and the relationship between, noise factor and effective input noise temperature

are found in Sections 2.1 and 2.2.

Strictly speaking, noise factor, F(f) , and effective input noise temperature,

Tg(f), are functions of frequency, and are defined in terms of the noise power

in a one hertz bandwidth at a specified frequency, f. However, the manner in

which transducers are used and the practical limitations of instrumentation

usually require measurements to be made over a band of frequencies greater than

one hertz in width. Thus the quantities actually measured are AVERAGE NOISE

FACTOR, F, and AVERAGE EFFECTIVE INPUT NOISE TEMPERATURE, T^, the averages being

taken over the frequency band.

This guide is not primarily concerned with the validity of the definitions of

F and T^, nor with questions pertaining to their applicability. Discussions of

those matters can be found in the technical literature [1] - [9]

F and T^ are widely measured by a large number of people for a variety of

purposes. The cost, quality, and sometimes even the feasibility of an electronics system are often significantly influenced by noise performance. For

example, the operating costs of commercial satellite communications systems can

increase by many hundreds of thousands of dollars per decibel of noise factor

increase. The effective range of radar is inversely proportional to noise

factor. The sensitivity of nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometers; the

ability to detect, measure, and study heavy organic molecules in deep space with

radio telescopes; the radiometric mapping of Earth for natural resources,

ecological purposes, etc.; all these improve with reduced noise factor.

^The term "transducer" as used in this guide is a generalized concept as defined

in Appendix A, Definition of Terms. Refer to Appendix A for definitions of

terms important to the proper understanding of this guide.
Indeed, the noise performance of systems is a fundamental limiting factor to

their ultimate sensitivity, capacity, and operational efficiency. The measurement of noise performance factors therefore often serves an important role in

the design and operation of systems.

2
1

_l UJ

I— i-t O O

LUo

Q- I—

LU a.

hO

oe: LUoQ

CO LU

CC l-H q: o

LUo

a.

LU LU > Q I—I Q

I— <:

oe:

k

LUO

00

LU

1/1

oo

1—1 O II o

o3 1—

I—

—1 cC

<C cH O LU

l-H CO

C/1 I—

o

I—

ZD I Q- O

h- I—I o _J<:ot—

CO

LU '-rf 3 00 O

0- II

LU

O

CO 1—

1-

H I— O <C

o3 LU

OO

_J I—

ca;

o

2: 2: O I t-1 o

C/0 I—

r3 <c

QZ

I—I I—

00

t—i Q O 00

—I LU

2: q:

l-H

o

00 00

+->

<uoI c

cn

•r— CO

I/) Ll_ O " z s-o

<u

a

O (O

-o

to O) C (/) 03 -i- S- o

h4- s- o o

4-> u to

M- t/) <+- 03 LU oa

(U

CD
!—

_l LU o o

K1 1—1

o

Q- I—

LU

II

LjJ o

ZDQ

OO UJ

q;o

O

Q-> Q

1—I Q

I— <

H—

00I—

oz

£2.

o

=3 cei

Cl. UJ I— 3

=3

O

O D- o o

LlJ O

O

t—I z O CD Z t—

CO

QO

a:

LU

>-

o

1—

na

o oo

IRAN

(U

,so

a.

O)V)

a

•r— 1— O

O)

+-> sCL4->

4-> s- o

a.E

iQ

4-> 1— O

I—

V)

•1—

oo

2:

0)

+-) •1— 3 o Q.C1—

s-

<u 0) a >

:3 -o -l-> to o

O) Ms- M1— LU

so o

M-

+-> o (/) O) •r—to

<+- LU

CM

(U

4
2. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

To establish the basis for the measurement methods discussed in this guide,

the definitions and certain fundamental features of F and T^ are given below.

2.1. Average Noise Factor

Average noise factor, F, is a dimensionless ratio that was originated to

indicate the noisiness of a two-port transducer. There are two points of view

that lead to F. Historically, the first, introduced by North [10] , is that F is

the ratio of (1) the output noise power from the transducer to (2) the output

noise power from an equivalent noise-free transducer (see figure 3). Thus, it

is the ratio of two powers. The second, introduced by Friis [11], is that F is

the ratio of (1) the input signal-to-noise ratio, S^^/N^, to (2) the output signal

to-noise ratio, S^/N^, of the transducer (see figure 4). Thus, it is the ratio

of two power ratios. These two points of view lead to the same result, which is

expressed formally by the IEEE definition [12] (see figure 5) given in Appendix A

The essential part of this definition is as follows

The average noise factor (average noise figure) of a two-port

transducer is the ratio of N^, the total noise power delivered

by the transducer into its output termination when the noise

temperature of its input termination is standard (290 K) at all

frequencies , to N , that portion of N engendered by the input

s o termination . Thus

N

F = _o

N

• s

For a transducer that has gain in more than one frequency band, such as a heterodyne or other multiple-response system, the denominator, N^, includes only

that noise power from the input termination that lies in the same frequency

interval (s) as an information-bearing system signal. does not include noise

contributions, such as those from an unused image-frequency or \anused idlerfrequency band, where no system signal exists. Because of this interpretation

of the definition, F of a given transducer may depend upon the signal characteristics of the system in which it is used. This situation has given rise to terms

such as

a. single channel noise figure

b. narrow band noise figure

c. radar noise figure

d. single sideband noise figure

5
,1

1 (SIGNAL) I

TOTAL

NOISE

RELATIVE POWER OUTPUT

^ ^ TOTAL OUTPUT NOISE POWER

N OUTPUT NOISE POWER FROM

^ EQUIVALENT NOISE-FREE TRANSDUCER

Figure 3. D. 0. North's Concept of T.

6
CDI—

1

—I

o

cC 00

I— •-« O O I o

Q- 1

00 1 1 1 ' ' ' /—

1 1 (4_ 1 1 r\ 1 1 [ I +J 1 1 1 (~l 1 , 1 1 1 1 d) 1 1 ' ' ' \J 1 (_) 00 1—

1—

o o o e ^ 1 1 o o 1— (/) \— 1 _J

_i <: s_ <t Ll_ 21

CD 1—

• 1—

OO 1—

I/O 1—

1— ZD zr.

:z) QQ. 1—

ZD

1—

O

II (U

s>

•c—

o

cc -21 C7> UJ O o OO OO I—

OO

OO

I—

o

LU 7
i

(SIGNAL) J

TOTAL

NOISE

1

s 0

RELATIVE POWER OUTPUT

^ ^ ^ _ TOTAL OUTPUT NOISE POWER

N PORTION OF ORIGINATING

IN INPUT TERMINATION

Figure 5. IEEE's Concept of F.

8
which pertain to transducers in which the system signal lies in only one

frequency band, and

e. double channel noise figure

f. broad band noise figure

g. astronomy noise figure

h. double sideband noise figure

which pertain to transducers in which the system signal lies in two or more

frequency bands. In the special case of a transducer that has gain in only

one frequency interval, F is by definition a "single channel" type of noise

factor, regardless of the bandwidth of the transducer. In general, for a given multiple-response transducer, the single channel noise factor, F , is

greater than the broad band noise factor, F^ (see Section 5.6.)

The relationship between F^ and F^ is given by the equation

— — (GB)b ^ (GB)g (2)

where (GB) is the area under that part of the transducer gain fiinction, G(f) , that includes the frequency band(s) in which the system signal lies. That is,

(GB)g = G(f)df (3)

and

CGB)j^ = j^^ GCf)df, (4)

where the integral in (3) is over only the frequency range, f^ , that includes

the narrow band signal, and the integral in (4) is over the frequency ranges,

fj^, that includes the broad band signal.

Measurement techniques that use a broad band test source, such as a wideband

noise generator, will normally yield Fj^ unless the transducer has gain in only

a single band of frequencies, or unless special measures are taken to limit the

measurement frequency range by filters (see Section 4.7.1), Conversely, measurement techniques that use a CW signal generator as a test source will yield

either F^ or Fj^ depending upon whether (GB) is evaluated over one or more bands

of G(f) . Thus measurements of F^ are readily made by dispersed-signal techniques

but the F of a multiple-response transducer must be made either by a CW techs
nique or by using filters in a dispersed-signal technique. The measured value

of F (i.e., either F^ or F^) has meaning only when the measurement frequency

interval, f or f, , is specified,

s b

^

Average noise factor depends also upon the impedance (admittance) of the

transducer's input termination; therefore, it is meaningful only when the

impedance (or admittance) of the input termination is specified (see Section

5.1).

Some engineers have adopted the practice of using the term "noise factor" to

indicate the numerical power ratio and the term "noise figure" to indicate the

power ratio expressed in decibels. This practice is not universally followed

and, since it is contrary to the intent of the committee who formulated the IEEE

definition (see p. 42 of reference [13]), this practice is discouraged. These

terms may be used interchangeably.

2.2. Average Effective Input Noise Temperature

Average effective input noise temperature, T^, is another widely used measure

of transducer noisiness, but the basic concept is different from that of noise

factor. T^ is a fictitious TEMPERATURE, having the dimensions of kelvins (K)

that is assigned to a real transducer to represent how much noise power the

transducer adds to an input signal. The IEEE definition of T^ [14] is given

in Appendix A; the essential part of this definition is as follows:

The average effective input noise temperature, T^, of a multi-port

transducer, with one port designated as the output port, is the

noise temperature, in kelvins, which, when assigned simultaneously

to the specified impedance terminations at all frequencies at all

accessible ports except the designated output port of a NOISEFREE

EQUIVALENT of the transducer, would yield the same total noise

power in a specified output band delivered to the output termination

as that of the ACTUAL TP^SDUCER connected to noisefree equivalents

of the terminations at all ports except the output port

To help understand this definition, two block diagrams are shown in figure 6.

In the upper diagram, the input ports of the NOISE-FREE EQUIVALENT of the

multiport transducer are terminated in source impedances, each at temperature

T^. The total noise power available from the transducer is P^^. In the lower

diagram, the input ports of the ACTUAL (noisy) multiport transducer are terminated in source impedances of the same impedance values as before, but each such

input termination is NOISE-FREE (noise temperature of 0 K) . The total noise

power available from this transducer is also . The value of T necessary to

ij e

10
n

= T

= T

NOISE-FREE

EQUIVALENT OF

MULTIPORT

TRANSDUCER

T^ = 0 K

T2 = 0 K

T = 0 K

ACTUAL

(NOISY)

MULTIPORT

TRANSDUCER

Figure 6. IEEE's Concept of Tg.

11
produce the same value of P^^ in both diagrams is equal to the value of the

average effective input noise temperature of the actual multiport transducer.

Note that each of the diagrams of figure 6 requires the use of fiction (e.g.,

noise-free equivalent components) . However, the real quantity, of the real,

noisy multiport transducer is established through the use of this fiction.

For a two-port transducer with a single input and a single output frequency

band, is related to F by the equations

= 290 (F - 1) , . (5)

and

290

F = + 1. (6)

For transducers with gain in more than one frequency band, is related to Fj_^ as given in (5) and (6) , above, and to F^ according to the relationships [13]

T = 290

e

F ^ - 1 (7)

\ (GB) /

and

(GB)

-sM^-2foj^- ^ llo)

differs from F in the following ways:

a. F pertains to a two-port transducer;

pertains to multi-port transducers.

b. F is defined only when the input teirmination to the transducer is at

a temperature of 290 K;

is defined independently of the temperature of the input termination.

c. F is a function of the frequency distribution of the system signal;

is independent of the frequency distribution of the

system signal.

12
d. F has a minimum limiting value of unity;

has a minimum limiting value of zero.

is most readily measured by wide band dispersed-signal techniques,

although it can be measured by CW techniques. In the latter case, the transducer's noise bandwidth must also be measured to obtain (see Appendix C)

2.3. Noise Bandwidth

Noise bandwidth, B, is the width of an ideal rectangular gain function whose

area, G B, is the same as the transducer's gain function area, (GB) (see o s Appendix C) . That is

(GB)

B = ^ (9)

G

o

where G^ is the transducer gain at some reference frequency, f^.

It is important to recognize that B is a variable parameter of the transducer.

Its value depends upon the choice of f^ because G^ depends upon frequency. A

given transducer does not have a unique value of B because there are no adequate

standards that specify the choice of f^. For a transducer with a single maximum in its gain function, f^ is commonly chosen as the frequency of maximiam gain,

and B has a well-defined value. However, for transducers having gain functions

of more complicated shape or for those having gain in more than one frequency

band, the choice of f^ may not be so obvious; f^ may not be selected the same

by all metrologists . Hence the value of B may differ from case to case. The

effect of arbitrarily choosing f^ is to make B large if G^ is small, or to make

B small if G^ is large.

A brief analysis of the CW techniques would show that the actual value of B,

per se, is not important (see Appendix C) . The important transducer parameter,

for the purpose of measuring F, is not its noise bandwidth, B, but rather its

gain-bandwidth product, (GB) . Indeed, B is "measured" by measuring (GB) and

dividing it by the measured value of G I15J . (GB) is a constant for a given

transducer. Therefore, f^ can be selected, in principle, at any frequency

within the interval of f^ without affecting the value of F. In practice however,

the measurement is normally most accurate if f^ is chosen where G(f) is large

(at or near a maximum) rather than out on the "skirts" of the gain function.

The need to evaluate either B or (GB)^ does not arise with dispersed-signal

measurement techniques. These techniques are distinctly advantageous for

this reason; the measurement of (GB)^ in the absence of competent equipment

of advanced design can be tedious, difficult, and inaccurate.

13
This discussion of noise bandwidth is given to place B into proper perspective

in the MEASURERMENT of F. It must not be inferred that the noise PERFORMANCE

of a transducer is independent of its noise bandwidth. On the contrary, if

a transducer's noise bandwidth is poorly chosen with respect to the system

signal's bandwidth, the transducer's performance may be quite poor.

2.4. Transducer Linearity

*\ The definitions of F and T^ do not require that the transducer be linear.

In principle, every transducer has an F and T regardless of the signal level. _ e However, if the transducer is non-linear, F and T^ may vary with signal level,

depending upon the nature of the non-linearity and other transducer characteristics. A single value of F (or T^) then does not describe the noisiness

of the transducer, and its meaningfulness is reduced.

On the other hand, each of the known techniques for measuring F and T^

is tacitly based on the assumption that either (1) the transducer is linear

or (2) F and T^ are independent of signal level. When either condition is

not the case, measurement results on a given transducer may be variable. This

is the reason for the practically sound but technically incorrect belief that

F and T~ apply only to linear transducers

14
3. MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES

Techniques for measuring F and T^ are broadly divided between broad band

and narrow band techniques. Broad band techniques typically use noise generators

or other dispersed-signal sources as a measurement signal, whereas narrow

band techniques use CW signal generators, either unmodulated or modulated.

The most generally accurate broad band measurement technique is the Y-factor

techniaue. Two variations of this technique are described below. The most

widely used broadband techniques are the 3-dB and automatic noise figure meter

(ANFM) techniques. Another broad band technique that has at times been used

is the gain control technique

The most widely used narrow band measurement technique is the CW technique

using an unmodulated signal. Other narrow band techniques include the tangential

and comparison techniques

All of these techniques are described in this section, along with their

relative merits and weaknesses. The purpose of these discussions is to provide

an understanding of the basic procedures involved in each technique. Therefore,

certain ideal conditions are assumed, viz., (a) the two-port transducer is

linear, stable, well shielded and has gain in only one frequency band, (b) the

measurement instrumentation is properly selected for the intended purpose,

(c) the transducer has no peculiar electrical or mechanical characteristics

that prevent the measurement from being made as indicated, and (d) the noise

temperature of generator source impedances is standard (29 0 K) unless otherwise

stated. Deviations from these ideal conditions, including their effects and

how to cope with them, are discussed in later sections of this Guide , particularly

Section 5, Practical Measurement Problems.

Although the equations included in this section are for the assumed ideal

conditions, they are often adequate for many real-world situations where,

e.g., the measurement accuracy requirements are modest. For more complete

equations, and for an understanding of the derivation of these equations,

refer to Section 6, Working Equations.

Some idea of test equipment characteristics and availability as required

by these techniques can be obtained from Section 4, Instrumentation. The

accuracy that can be expected under a given set of conditions can be estimated

by the methods given in Section 7, Measurement Errors, and examples of hypothetical measurement results are given in Section 8, Measurement Examples.

15
These measurement techniques apply generally across the full frequency

spectrum, from very low frequencies through the millimeterwave frequencies.

The particular choice of technique for a given situation will depend upon

many factors including (a) desired accuracy/ (b) instrumentation required,

(c) equipment availability, (d) equipment costs, (e) frequency range,

(f) transducer type, (g) convenience of technique, (h) measurement speed,

and (i) operator experience. Most of these factors are discussed briefly

in this section. Costs are not discussed in detail since they will vary from

time to time and from one situation to another. However, the information

contained in this Guide should be helpful in estimating comparative costs

when used in conjunction with current manufacturer's price information.

A summary of the more important characteristics of these measurement techniques is given in Table I.

3.1. Y-Factor Technique

The Y-factor technique uses dispersed-signal sources of power applied to

the transducer under test. The most commonly used sources generate random

noise power that is distributed over a wide frequency range. The Y-factor

technique derives its name from the quantity

(10)

where and are two noise power levels at the OUTPUT PORT of the transducer

that result from two different levels of noise power applied to its input

port

Two Y-factor methods are commonly used, viz., (a) the power meter method

and (b) the variable attenuator method. They differ principally in the way

the Y-factor is measured.

3.1.1. Power Meter Method

Basic Method

This method uses a pair of random noise generators and a power meter [13] as shown in figure 7. One of the noise generators (designated "hot") has

a higher noise temperature, T, , than the other (designated "cold"), T . The

hot and cold noise generators provide known available powers to the transducer.

The power meter measures the output power levels from the transducer. The

ratio of the two output power levels corresponding to the two input powers

16
rj3 J- J-

(U

B

(U -rH

H 4-) 4J -P +J -p T) -d W 'O m cn 0 w to

w (11 fd fii fd OJ (1) ,—1 03

Tt. Ft. M-l fcl l-H

A-i

(~t A-t

U 

Bb

H i-( fj

1-1 •ri -H ,c •H

•0

n

Q 111QQ 01 d)

c; -P

-P

to 5 5 0

•H

o

r-<

i-J t-t r-< -P 4J

4j

u *H *H 'H •iH *rH ^3 O U/ (U 0 Q) 0

»-» 5"' . T

i-H

tfl fit nivy

1-1

H

'H

to , 1 \J rri jJ 'O

ti "H r\\J \J \J

u

nn r\\j (11 Cs\J Tn in

,—1 -H >i >i t3 >i >1 >i

-p fd

u

U 0 u

o 0 u

uuu

c \J n\

yit /S n\\V »^

iiiie

h

k> 1^

rn t> k>

U

NNN 3 N N N N N hr" H-t w N T* l-M N 1-L4 CD

(0

r ^ T'i-Ihr 1

<U r*>-i

r 1 r 1 s ftJ o ,—

m ro , 1 o s«»>i r \ \J A o o r\\J n\j

Q

4J -p 4-J 4J 4J +J

o

-H «-i f*

NNNNN

NN

-P •t^ f-U

H-(

M-l T*H-t !t! "T* t-M to tu An yj

•rH

u

O

O

O I—

i-H fa , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ^ ^

0) \/ \y \/ ,—

4JU dp

(0 <^o oV> (^p o\o dP 0 0 O o O in irj O 0 in 0 0

(0 ,—CN ^» CN CN ^

Chi

r\\j

Q \j

m -H -P +-' 1 

_ij

-t-' 0 >1 a u >i

fO CM

o in

o in in 0 u M 1^ 1—1 ro fO

(0 3UO

<:

-P dP

[0 o\o o\o o\o o\o o\o in

0) f-i iH CN IT) in CN iH ro CN

03 >( )( HW

\Jr\\J

nn r-« 4^

Eh

c 4J

4j ni d) (\S niu/ r 1 r\\J 5* M r-t

i-J fll

'X' nl

M r*}~t

n

r

\ \J r^\J

ni

a rnyjj tiM

(U 4J •H 3 111

o (11 0

lU 1—CO

n r-H CO •H «-< H rH C frt n (J U

w

;C yu >-i 111 ri rn O r\\J 1 ) <j V 1 \ . . .1 Q) 4J H (Tt r \ \-/ (rt (11 •H iiM

E-<

r 1 A Tt. t\\ (0 CQ O c Cn

\J J^J i' 1 IS (0 0

(0 ro < O 03

u &-I

u

.H (N in

17
• ca3O

•H

p

Q 0)

l-l -P (U 13

EH E< > CU

>1

CO •H

>i rl -p rl

c

JQ

p ec gu 0 Tj c • •n <u -H <U (U (1) u

-P -P -s

fO rl 0) -rl CO

w

Pi

H Pi

M -P rl •H Xi •rl 3

rH

H1—

1—

CO x!

(d -P hi: er

CO

w <U -rl

u

H

U rl •rl 3

X! 13

(1)

c x!P cn

QJ

o

P 4H cn

C

rH rl

c 13 r) •rl (d

lO

P rl

U

M fd

U

S 13 -p

P

-p 13

c

>i

H !:! >i

H

G -P 0)

O 0 CD

O

O (0

C 6 I—

C -P R C -P ,Q 0) 0) >< 1T< iD cu n3 3 QJ (d V^ •P *H M 3 U 0) a 3 0 u -P ij^ Q) W rl CO p

0)

c

c cu

a

c 05 (D

C

C

H 3 (d 0 O. u U

i-t

i-tM Q)

o 0 CJ' Q)

u

tn

H 2: 3 W

S

-P

(U 3

rH

H CO O4

10 0 •rl -P dl -p o 3 rH

•t-\ nJ 0 Id o Sh 3

0) Mh IH

•H

M

cU 0 0 Q)

H

O a) 0 M -P Cn -p Ul

P -P -P

(UH «S

u (d >H

cC 3 m -p o u 0 <D M O Q) x; Q) 0 u ^ Q) -p o -p w 1) P S -P XI s (0 (CS -rt c fd (U 13 0) (d (U —

3 a) 3 O <D 3 5h H u O M M C 1T> 3 H 0 (U QJ (U CO 13 cn 3 Vh §

4J

Q -P -P

Q •p (dC rd

s

c

OM -P -P 0 -p Q) (d cu

\ (d CO w < EH < K EH < S CO S

xi

iH tn

rH •H •H •H •r(

•rH X! X! X!

CO >i

rH

>i rH >i

rH

>1

rH

M 'D (U (U (U (U O Q) -p -P -P •P

fO (0 (d

RR (d

U >H

Sh 3 0) -H 0) -rH

H (U •rl X! -H

0) cr T) -a -a 13 13 T) T3 in 13 0 0 <u 0 0) O <u H (D o ec; s s s S s S s s K S

x:

-r( 3 •H 3

Q) •H -HH xi -H

U Hi C o 0 (0

<U -p

s •p

B

•H

o f-t G o o H o 0

Q) -p -p

p > •H x: •H >1 X! X! •> > •>

l> > tn

o 5 0 0 H

o

H -rl

u ^^

S ^^K > K

(UCO

CO3u

CO rl

13

<uu

(d

COe

rH

X) in OU C

04O

-rl rH -P

Id

O

U 0)

CU CO c

cu

c

CJ -rl

18
O UJ

i \

hUJ CO

o LU

ZD I— Q

tn OL

UJQ

a: z:

\— ZD

A t

0

L 1— 00 <

o H-i q;

3: o UJ

CD

4

0

UJ 1—

Q OO <C

_l 1--1 OL 0 0 UJ 0 2: Z

CD

T3

O

!->

S-

(U

SO)s

o

Q.

S-o

+J

O

03 UI >-

19
is the Y- factor. and F are computed from the measured Y- factor and the

known noise temperatures of the two noise sources.

Operational Characteristics

This method is capable of very high accuracy; measurement uncertainties as small as 1% (0.04 dB) are possible under best conditions, and typical uncertainties lie between 2% (0.1 dB) and 10% (0.4 dB) . It is capable of high precision^

particularly when the measurement system is automated [16 J . For these reasons,

this method often is chosen over other methods (except for the Y-factor/

attenuator method) when high accuracy and precision are desired. It is used

when an accurate power meter is available and an accurate variable attenuator

is not. The principal measurement error in most typical situations comes

from the power meter rather than from the noise sources

The method is applicable over a very wide range of frequencies, e.g., from

below 10 kHz to beyond 60 GHz.

Measurement apparatus for this method is commercially available for many,

but not all, of the measurement situations encountered. When using precision

noise generators, instrumentation tends to be expensive; this is also true

if the measurement system is automated and if the highest accuracy is desired.

Otherwise, instrumentation costs are modest.

When performed manually, the power meter method is not rapid, and is not

as convenient as the ANFM technique for displaying the effects of adjustments

on the transducer. However, it is straight-forward and comparatively troublefree. It requires a moderately high level of operator skill.

Test Equipment Required

a. Hot noise generator

bj Cold noise generator

c. Power meter

Basic Procedure

1. Arrange the equipment as shown in figure 7.

2. Connect the Hot Noise Generator to the transducer input port.

3. Record the reading of the Power Meter, P, .

20
4. Disconnect the Hot Noise Generator and connect the Cold Noise Generator

to the transducer input port.

5. Record the reading of the Power Meter, •

6. Compute the Y-factor from the equation

(11) c

7 . Compute T from the equation

(12)

8. Compute F from the equation

T, - YT

F = ^— + 1, (13)

290 (Y - 1)

or from (6)

T

F = + 1 (6)

290

Also,

F (dB) = 10 logio F. (14)

3.1.2. Attenuator Method

Basic Method

This method is similar to the Power Meter method, except that it uses an accurate variable attenuator and a signal level indicator to measure Y [17]

See figure 8.

21
o

-=C —1 1—

Z u-1 -sa: CJ > o •—1 Li OO _J Q

—

(

t

q:

LlJ o

_J 1— cn cc

1—

z:

cc UJ

< I—

> I—

i

t

cc 1—

LlJ 00 O UJ ZD t— O

oo cc

LjJ <: Q

q: •z. I—

-oo

JCZ

(U

s-o

4->

(U

4J

+J<:

s-oM

o

to

>-

00

<u

sa:o

UJ 1—

1— oo O HH oc ^ O LlJ z: LU

CD

o

uJ 1—

Q

_j 1—1 q: O O LlJ o z: z:

LU

22
Operational Characteristics

li

The operational characteristics of this method are generally the same as

[j for the Power Meter method. This method is used when an accurate variable

attenuator is available and an accurate power meter is not. The principal

I measurement error comes typically from the attenuator error rather than from

the noise sources or the signal level indicator.

Test Equipment Required

a. Hot noise generator

b. Cold noise generator

c. Variable attenuator

d. Signal level indicator

Basic Procedure

1. Arrange the apparatus as shown in figure 8.

2. Connect the Cold Noise Generator to the transducer input port.

3. Adjust the Variable Attenuator to produce an Indicator reading near

full scale.

4. Record the Indicator reading I^.

5. Record the Attenuator setting, A^(dB), in decibels.

6. Disconnect the Cold Noise Generator and connect the Hot Noise Generator

to the transducer input port.

7. Adjust the Attenuator to produce the same Indicator reading I^.

8. Record the new Attenuator setting, Aj^(dB), in decibels.

9. Compute the Y-factor in decibels from the equation

Y (dB) = A^ (dB) - Aj^ (dB) . (15)

23
10 . Convert the Y-factor in decibels to Y-factor by the equation

Y = antilogj o

11. Compute from equation (12)

Y (dB)

10

(IS)

T =

e

T, - YT h c

(12)

Y - 1

12. Compute F and F(dB) from equations (6) or (13) , and (14)

F = + 1

290

(6)

F =

- YT

+ 1

290 (Y - 1)

F (dB) = 10 logio F

(13)

(14)

3.2. 3-dB Technique

This technique is similar to the Y-Factor/Attenuator Method except that

an accurate fixed attenuator of 3 dB insertion loss is inserted in place of

the variable attenuator, and the Y-factor is forced to have the fixed value

of 2 (i.e., 3 dB) . Because of this, the noise source must have a continuously

adjustable output level.

Two methods are possible. The most common method uses a temperature- limited

diode (TLD) of the thermionic vacuum type as a source of shot noise. Such

a generator has an easily adjustable output level. A less common method uses

a fixed- level noise generator and a variable attenuator to adjust its output

level. The choice of method depends primarily upon the equipment available

and the transducer frequency range.

24
3.2.1. Variable Source Method

Basic Method

This method uses a TLD noise generator, a 3 dB attenuator, and a signal

level indicator [18] as shown in figure 9. The TLD noise generator supplies an

adjustable but known input power to the transducer over a range of frequencies

that normally exceeds that passed by the transducer. The signal level indicator

is used to indicate a reference level of output power, which needs not be

measured.

With the generator output control adjusted to produce zero shot noise (output

is only residual thermal noise) , and with the 3 dB attenuator out of the system,

the transducer output power produces an indication on the signal level indicator.

Then the 3 dB attenuator is inserted into the system, and the noise generator

output is increased until the same indication is obtained. F is read directly

from the calibrated emission current meter for the TLD generator, or is computed

from the measured TLD emission current.

Note: In some situations, inserting the 3 dB attenuator into the system

may be difficult. An alternate scheme is to use a power meter instead

of the 3 dB attenuator and signal level indicator, and adjust the noise

generator for twice the initial output power level from the transducer.

Operating Characteristics

Typically, the accuracy of available TLD noise generators is not as good

as for fixed level generators, and the practical accuracy of this method suffers.

Measurement uncertainties as small as 5% (0.2 dB) are possible under best

conditions, and typical uncertainties lie between 10% (0.4 dB) and 60% (2 db)

This method is commonly used over a moderately wide range of frequencies,

e.g., from 1 MHz to 3 GHz, although in principle it can be used outside this

range. The frequency range is limited primarily by the range of shot noise

generators (see Section 4.1.2.3.).

Measurement apparatus is commercially available for use in the frequency

range just cited, and is typically less expensive than apparatus required

for other broad band methods (except the Gain Control/Variable Source Method)

25
—I o

=a: —1 1—

s: Lij es > o I—I UJ I—

I

CO _1 Q

T3

O

+-> O)

o

s-n

o

SI—

LlJ 00 O LU

ID I— Q

Z LU

T3

CO

<u

sa:

LU 0 1 Q 1—

LlJ 0 cC

cc: >—

1

OL Q LU

1—

< Q LU

LU

LjlI I—

Q_ 1—

1

LU s: 2:

LU 1—

1

1—

1

1— _J 0

26
This 3-dB method is somewhat faster to perform than most other methods,

but not as convenient as the ANFM technique for displaying the effects of

adjustments on the transducer. However, it is comparatively simple to perform and requires a moderate level of operator skill.

Test Equipment Required

a. Temperature-limited diode noise generator

b. 3 dB fixed attenuator

c. Signal level indicator

Basic Procedure

1. Arrange the apparatus as shown in figure 9.

2. Connect the output port of the transducer directly to the Signal Level

Indicator.

3. Turn the emission current of the TLD Noise Generator to zero (leave

the generator connected to the transducer under test)

4. Adjust the sensitivity of the Signal Level Indicator to produce a reading near full scale.

5. Record the Indicator reading, I.

6. Disconnect the transducer from the Signal Level Indicator.

7. Insert the 3 dB Attenuator between the transducer output port and the

Signal Level Indicator.

8. Increase the emission current of the TLD Noise Generator to produce

the Indicator reading, I.

9. Record the indicated value of F(dB) , in decibels, as read from the TLD

Generator meter.

10. If the emission current meter is not calibrated in terms of F(dB),

c compute F from the equation

F = 20 I^R, (17)

where

27
= emission current, in amperes, obtained in Step 8,

R = TLD source resistance, in ohms.

11. Compute, if desired, the value of F from the equation

F = antilogi

F (dB)

(18)

10

12. Compute the value of T from (5)

T = 290 (F - 1) (5)

3.2.2. Fixed Source Method

Basic Method

This method uses a fixed- level noise generator, a variable attenuator,

a 3 dB attenuator, and a signal level indicator [19] as shown in figure 10. The

noise generator supplies a known input power to the variable attenuator

whose attenuation, a, is known. Thus, the generator-attenuator pair serves

the same function as the TLD noise generator described above. Except for

the noise source, this method is closely similar to the Variable Source

Method (see Section 3.2.1.). However, instead of F, T^ is computed from

the known values of noise temperature and a.

Operating Characteristics

Because high precision noise generators and attenuators can be used, this

method is capable of very high accuracy; measurement uncertainties as small as 2% (0.1 dB) are possible under best conditions, and typical uncertainties lie

between 5% (0.2 dB) and 25% (1 dB)

This method is applicable over a very wide range of frequencies, e.g.,

from below 10 kHz to beyond 60 GHz.

Measurement apparatus for this method is commercially available for many, but

not all, of the measurement situations encountered. Instrumentation costs

range from modest to high, depending primarily upon the desired measurement

accuracy

28
o

-o :=)

ro UJ

1

o: 1—

UJ 00 0 LU

1—

Q

CO q: z: UJ <: Q

q;

1—

ai

LU 0

_J 1—

CQ ct

1—

r

q; UJ <: I— > 1—

-ao

(U

o

s-3

o

oo

-o

(I) X

03

oI ro

so

UJ I—

00 cj:

I—I q; O UJ

29
The method is moderately fast, but not as convenient as the ANFM Technique.

It has little to offer over the Y- factor/Attenuator Method, except in special

cases where the Y-factor must be fixed at 3 dB . It requires a moderately high

level of operator skill, but is comparatively straight-forward and troiible-free

Test Equipment Required

a. Random noise generator

b. Variable attenuator

c. 3 dB fixed attenuator

d. Signal level indicator

Basic Procedure

1. Arrange the apparatus as shown in figure 10.

2. Connect the output port of the transducer directly to the Signal Level

Indicator.

3. Turn the Noise Generator OFF (leave the generator connected to the

transducer under test)

4. Adjust the sensitivity of the Signal Level Indicator to produce a reading near full scale.

5. Record the Indicator reading, I.

6. Disconnect the transducer from the Signal Level Indicator.

7. Insert the 3 dB Attenuator between the transducer output port and the

Signal Level Indicator.

8. Turn the Noise Generator ON and adjust the Variable Attenuator to again

produce the Indicator reading, I.

9. Record the attenuation, A (dB) , in decibels, of the Variable Attenuator.

10. Convert the attenuation, A (dB) , in decibels, to transmittance , a, by

the equation

a = antilogioj^"^ ^^^^ j

. (19)

30
11. Compute from the equation

T~ = (T - T )a - T , (20) e n a a

where T is the noise temperature of the Noise Generator, and T is the temperan a ture of both the generator source impedance and the Variable Attenuator.

12. Compute F and F(dB) from equations (6) and (14).

F = — + 1 (6)

290

F(dB) = 10 logio F (14)

3.3. Automatic (ANFM) Technique

Basic Method

This technique uses an automatic noise figure measurement system [20],

[21] , [22] , which includes a switched random noise generator and an automatic

noise figure meter (ANFM) as shown in figure 11. The ANFM cyclicly switches

the noise generator between two output power levels, and automatically computes

F from the transducer output power. The measured value of F(dB) is displayed

by the ANFM's panel meter.

Operating Characteristics

This technique, as typically performed with commercial equipment, has

medium accuracy because of difficulties in calibrating the switched noise

generator and the analog circuitry in the ANFM. It is, however, in principle

capable of high accuracy, but usually at the sacrifice of speed and convenience.

Measurement uncertainties as small as 5% (0.2 dB) are possible under best

conditions with commercial equipment, and typical uncertainties lie between

7% (0.3 dB) and 25% (1 dB) .

Commercially available apparatus is available only for frequencies between

10 MHz and 40 GHz, although the principle of the method can be applied over

the range from below 10 kHz to over 60 GHz. Apparatus is modest in cost and

not difficult to use.

The method is fast, and is probably the most convenient of all methods of

medium to high accuracy for quickly displaying the effects of adjustments on

the transducer under test. It requires only a moderate level of operator skill.

Regular calibration of the automatic display apparatus may be necessary for

best results.

31
o ai

>—i ZD

1— ej a:

H LU

"sr 1 1 1 O LU

Li s:

ZD OO

<

o

i

LU

1— 1—

UJ _l

o LU

IT)

oo q: \—

LU

< Q o

zi " J—

1— 1—

3

00

i

Q q;

LU o

:n uJ 1—

O OO CC

1— H- •—t O LU 3 Z Z

00 LU

<u

cr

<u

o

(O

E

O

4->

0)

cn

32
Test Equipment Required

a. Automatic noise figure meter (ANFM)

b. Noise generator for use with the ANFM

Basic Procedure

1. Arrange the apparatus as shown in figure 11.

2. Adjust the Noise Generator current and other controls according to

manufacturer's instructions.

3. Set Operate switch to read Noise Figure on panel meter.

4. Record the indicated value of F{dB).

5. Compute, if desired, the value of F from equation (18)

r F(dB)

"I F = antilogio [ 10 J

^"""^^

6. Compute the value of from equation (5)

T~ = 290 (F - 1) (5) e

3.4. Gain Control Technique

The gain control technique [2 3] uses a random noise generator having an adjustable output level, such as is used in the 3-dB technique. It requires

that the gain of the transducer be adjustable over a limited range, and this

gain change must not significantly change the F or T^ of the transducer.

The gain control technique is useful in cases where the transducer tends

to saturate or clip in its later stages. If the transducer includes either

a linear or a power detector, this detector can often be used in the measurement

system.

As with the 3-dB technique, two methods are possible; one uses a temperaturelimited diode noise generator and the other uses a fixed-level noise generator

and a variable attenuator. The choice of method depends primarily upon the

equipment availability and the transducer frequency range.

33
3.4.1. Variable Source Method

Basic Method

This method uses a TLD noise generator and a signal level indicator as shown in figure 12. The TLD noise generator supplies an adjustable but known

input power to the transducer over a range of frequencies that normally exceeds

that passed by the transducer. The signal level indicator is used to indicate

two different reference levels of output power, neither of which needs to

be known.

With the generator output control adjusted to produce zero shot noise (output

is only residual thermal noise) , and with maximum transducer gain, the transducer

output power produces an indication, I^, on the signal level indicator. Then

the noise generator output is increased to produce a larger indication,

The transducer gain is reduced to again produce 1^^, and the noise generator

output is increased to again produce I^' F is computed from the measured

values of TLD emission current by means of (21) which is given below.

Operating Characteristics

Typically, the accuracy of available TLD noise generators is not as good

as for fixed level generators, and the practical accuracy of this method suffers.

Measurement uncertainties as small as 5% (0.2 dB) are possible under best

conditions, and typical uncertainties lie between 10% (0.4 dB) and 60% (2 dB)

dB) .

The method is commonly used over a moderately wide range of frequencies,

e.g.^ from 1 MHz to 3 GHz, although in principle it can be used outside this

range. The frequency range is limited primarily by the range of shot noise

generators (see Section 4.1.2.3.).

Measurement apparatus is commercially available for use in the frequency

range just cited, and is typically less expensive than apparatus required

for other broad band methods (except the 3-dB/Variable Source method)

This method is moderately fast, but not as convenient as the ANFM technique.

It requires a moderate level of operator skill, and is comparatively straightforward to perform.

Test Equipment Required

a. Temperature-limited diode noise generator

b. Signal level indicator

34
O

SI

+J

(U

^-

o UJ

1—

O

(/) UJ <

Or; 1— ZD

a:

UJ

o 1 Q 1—

LU

O1—1

q; rD Q UJ

1—< Q UJ

en UJ C3

LlJ 1—

Q- 1—1

UJ

s:' oo

LlJ >—1

1—1

H- _l

o

2:

0)oo

</)

s_o

s4-> c:oo

C3

CM

S35
Basic Procedure

1. Arrange the apparatus as shown in figure 12.

2. Turn the emission current of the TLD Noise Generator to zero (leave

the generator connected to the transducer under test)

3. Adjust the transducer gain to its maximum value.

4. Adjust the sensitivity of the Signal Level Indicator to produce a reading at least 10 dB above its own noise level.

5. Record the Indicator reading 1^^.

6. Increase the emission current of the TLD Noise Generator to produce

a new Indicator reading I2 that is 3 dB or more above l^-

7. Record the Indicator reading

8. Record the emission current, I^^^f in amperes, that produces I2.

9. Reduce the gain of the transducer to produce the Indicator reading 1^^ with emission current I-,,. dl

10 . Increase the emission current of the TLD Noise Generator to again produce

the Indicator reading I2.

11. Record the emission current, 1^2' amperes, that produces I2 with

reduced transducer gain.

12 . Compute F from the equation

20R(I,t)^

F = , (21)

^d2-2Idl

v/here R = TLD source resistance, in ohms.

Compute F(dB) and T^ from equations (14) and (5)

36
F(dB) = 10 log

1 0

T = 290 (F - 1) e

(14)

(5)

3.4.2. Fixed Source Method

Basic Method

This method uses a fixed-level noise generator, a variable attenuator,

and a signal level indicator as shown in figure 13. The noise generator supplies

a known input power to the variable attenuator whose attenuation, a, is known.

Thus the generator-attenuator pair serves the same function as the TLD noise

generator described above. Except for the noise source, this method is closely

similar to the Variable Source Method (see Section 3.4.1.) . However, instead

of F, T^ is computed from the known values of noise temperature and a.

Operating Characteristics

Because high precision generators and attenuators can be used, this method

is capable of very high accuracy. However, since changing the transducer

gain may change some of the other transducer properties, this accuracy potential

is not always obtained. Measurement uncertainties as small as 2% (0.1 dB)

are possible under best conditions, and typical uncertainties lie between

5% (0.2 dB) and 40% (1.5 dB)

This method is applicable over a very wide range of frequencies, e.g.,

from below 10 kHz to beyond 60 GHz.

Measurement apparatus for this method is commercially available for many,

but not all, of the measurement situations encountered. Instrumentation costs

range from modest to high, depending primarily upon the desired measurement

accuracy

The method is moderately fast, but not as convenient as the ANFM technique.

It requires a moderately high level of operator skill, but is comparatively

straight-forward and trouble-free.

Test Equipment Required

a. Random noise generator

37
hLU

C_3 LU

Z3 I— Q

cc

UJ

h- ZD

o

CD

OO

-ao

O)o

&-=3o

00

<uXoooc

LU

o

_J hQQ eX.

o < ZD

1—

• UJ > 1— 3 o

LU I—

(/I ca;

t-i q; O LU

CD

38
b. Variable attenuator

c. Signal level indicator

Basic Procedure

1. Arrange the apparatus as shown in figure 13.

2. Turn the Noise Generator OFF (leave the generator connected to the

transducer under test)

3. Adjust the transducer gain to its maximum value.

4. Adjust the sensitivity of the Signal Level Indicator to produce a reading at least 10 dB above its own noise level.

5. Record the Indicator reading, 1^,

6. Turn the Noise Generator ON and adjust the Variable Attenuator to

produce a new Indicator reading ±2 that is from 3 dB to 6 dB above I

7. Record the Indicator reading

8. Record the attenuation, A^ (dB) , in decibels, of the Variable

Attenuator, that produces I^.

9 . Reduce the gain of the transducer to again produce the Indicator

reading 1^^ with the Attenuator set to A^ (dB) .

10 . Decrease the attenuation of the Variable Attenuator to again produce

the Indicator reading I2.

11. Record the attenuation, A2 (dB) , in decibels, that produces 1^ with

the reduced transducer gain.

12. Convert the attenuations, A^ (dB) and A2 (dB) , in decibels, to

attenuations, and a, , by the equations

(22)

39
r -A^ (dB) 1 a J = antilogio • (23)

L 10 J

13. Compute from the equation

°'2~ 1

where is the noise temperature of the Noise Generator,

and T is the temperature of both the Generator source

a impedance and the Variable Attenuator.

14. Compute F and F (dB) from equations (6) and (14).

_ ^

F = — + 1 (6)

290

F(dB) = 10 logio F (14)

3.5. CW Technique

The CW technique of measuring F is a narrow band measurement technique that

uses an adjustable frequency sine-wave signal generator [15] . Thus it has

application when a dispersed-signal (noise) generator is unavailable.

Basic Method

This technique uses a CW signal generator and a power meter as shown in

figure 14. A frequency meter is also required if the generator's frequency

calibration is inadequate. The CW generator supplies a known input power,

P , to the transducer at the measurement frequency, f . The power meter meas o sures the transducer output power xinder two conditions: (a) with the CW

generator OFF, in which case the output power P^, is entirely noise, and

(b) with the CW generator ON, in which case the output power, V^, is a mixture

of noise and CW. The signal generator and power meter are also used to measure

the noise bandwidth of the transducer (see Appendix C) . F is computed from the

known generator output, the measured output powers from the transducer, and the

measured noise bandwidth.

40
q; eel O LU

Q- S

13cr

q: I—

LlJ CO

o UJ

(U

o

Z LlJ

cu

>-o

=> I—

o

I—

<: O LlJ

LlJ CU

41
Note: For convenience in practice, is often adjusted to make

P2 = 2P^. This results in a second "3-dB" technique that is

similar in concept to that described in Section 3.2.1. However,

note that in the CW 3-dB technique, the transducer output power,

P^' is a mixture of noise and CW power. Therefore care must be

taken that the meter used to indicate the output level is a true

power detector and is not one that responds differently to noise

and CW power. Otherwise, an indicated 3 dB change in output level

may be in error (see Section 4.3.1.)

Operating Characteristics

In principle, this technique is capable of high accuracy. However, primarily

because of uncertainties in measuring noise bandwidth, the potential accuracy

is not always obtained. Measurement uncertainties in F as small as 1% (0.04 dB) are possible under best conditions, but typical uncertainties lie between

5% (0.2 dB) and 25% (1 dB)

This technique is applicable over an extremely wide range of frequencies,

e.g., from near zero hertz to over 300 GHz. It probably finds its greatest

application below 10 MHz, where other techniques are less applicable for

one reason or another.

Measurement apparatus for this technique is commercially available for

virtually every measurement situation encountered. No special instruments

are needed beyond those required for other common measurements such as gain,

bandwidth, sensitivity, etc.

The CW technique is somewhat tedious and time-consuming, especially if

high accuracy is desired and if ordinary laboratory equipment is used. However,

when automated generators and detectors are available, relatively rapid measurements are possible. Even so, its speed does not approach that of other techniques with presently available equipment. The technique requires a moderately

high level of operator skill.

Because of the time required by the technique, drifts in both the transducer

and the measurement apparatus can be a problem. Other troublesome problems

include (a) CW signal purity, (b) power meter response to the noise/CW mixture,

and (c) properly accounting for the multiple responses of the transducer (see

Sections 4 and 5)

Test Equipment Required

a. CW signal generator

42
b . Power Meter

c. Frequency Meter

Basic Procedure

1. Arrange the equipment as shown in figure 14.

2. Adjust the CW Generator output to zero (leave the generator

connected to the transducer under test)

3. Record the transducer output power, P^.

4. Adjust the CW Generator output to a level that the transducer can

amplify linearily, and which produces at least a 20 dB greater

output power level than P^ when the frequency of the CW signal

is tuned to the measurement frequency , f^

5. Record the available power level, P^, from the Signal Generator.

6. Record the transducer output power,

7. Determine the noise bandwidth, B, of the transducer by standard means

(see Appendix C)

8 . Compute F from the equation

P

s F = (25)

4x10 -21 B

9 . Compute F(dB) and T from equations (14) and (5).

F(dB) = 10 log 10 F (14)

T = 290 (F - 1) (5)

43
3.6. Tangential Technique

The tangential technique is a visual estimation technique that uses an oscilloscope to display information about the transducer noise [24] . It is

a narrow band technique in that it uses a CW signal generator, but it may

also be classified a broad band technique in that the CW signal generator

is 100% modulated with a square-wave signal, thus producing sidebands that

extend over a wide range of frequencies

Basic Method

This technique uses a pulsed signal generator and an oscilloscope as shown

in figure 15. If the transducer under test does not contain a suitable detector

(see Section 5.10), an external detector must be supplied. The frequency

and power meters are used with the signal generator to measure the transducer's

noise bandwidth, B (see Section 2.3). When pulsed ON, the signal generator

supplies a known CW power, , to the transducer at the measurement frequency,

f^. When pulsed OFF, the transducer input is thermal noise power. The oscilloscope displays the detected output from the transducer as a square-wave modulated noise signal. When is adjusted to produce a "tangential pattern,"

as shown in figure 16, a known output signal-to-noise ratio, (S/N)^ is assumed.

This has been emperically found to be approximately 11 dB for linear detectors

and approximately 8 dB for square-law detectors. F is computed from the known

value of Pg, the measured value of B, and the assumed value of (S/N)^.

Operating Characteristics

The tangential technique is a low-accuracy technique because of the subjective

nature of visually interpreting what one sees on the oscilloscope screen. Measurement uncertainties are probably never smaller than 30% (1.2 dB) even under

best conditions. The precision of measurement by a single, well-trained operator

is typically 10% (0.4 dB) to 25% (1 dB) , but the spread of measurement results

among different well-trained operators is typically no smaller than 30%

(1.2 dB)

The technique can be applied, in principal, over a very wide range of

frequencies, but best results are obtained with wide -bandwidth systems.

It is commonly used only with radar and similar equipment, although it applies

to other VHF and UHF transducers as well.

This technique is rapid and simple, and uses commonly-available test

equipment. The measurement data are displayed instantly and continuously

44
Q.oo

COoo

_l Cd

<t

o z I—

on c_> LU UJ

I— I— X LiJ UJ o

OC I—

UJ oo O UJ

rD I— QZ UJ

UJ UJ

IS I— 0 UJ

Cl. 2:

cmo

Q —J I—

LU ca: ca: CO Z

_j CD UJ

cr

•r—Co

d)

4-> c

un

D_ 00 UJ

45
46
on the oscilloscope screen, an advantage when making adjustment on the transducer. The technique requires a high degree of operator skill to reliably

interpret when the desired "tangential pattern" is obtained.

Test Equipment Required

a. Pulsed signal generator

b. Oscilloscope

c. External detector

d. Frequency meter

e. Power meter

Basic Procedure

1. Arrange the equipment as shown in figure 15. The Detector may

be either a linear (envelope) or square-law (power) detector.

2. Adjust the output power of the Signal Generator to zero.

3. Adjust the gain of the Oscilloscope to produce a noise trace of

1/4 to 2 centimeters height.

4. Square-wave modulate the Signal Generator 100% with a modulation

frequency between 1 kHz and 5 kHz

5. Adjust the output level of the Signal Generator so that the upper

segment of the trace is just completely above the bottom segment

of the trace (see figure 16)

6. Determine the power, P , in the CW signal during the ON half-cycle

of modulation.

7. Determine the noise bandwidth, B, of the transducer by standard

means (see Appendix C)

8. Compute F by either equation (26) or (27)

2P

F =

s X 10 1 9 (linear detector) (26)

B

4P

F =

s X 10 1 9 (square-law detector) (27)

B

47
9, Compute F(dB) and from equations (14) and (5).

F(dB) = 10 logio F (14)

= 290 (F - 1) (5)

3.7. Comparison Technique

The comparison technique requires a "master" transducer of known noise

factor against which transducers of like kind are compared [ 15J. It is

normally classified a narrow band technique in that it uses a CW generator as

a reference source.

Basic Method

This technique uses a CW signal generator, a master transducer, and a power

meter as shown in figure 17, The master transducer is a prototype of the

transducer under test, and its average noise factor, F^^, is assumed to be

known. The CW generator supplies an adjustable input power, , to the transducer at the measurement frequency, f ^ . The value of P^ need not be known.

The power meter measures each transducer's output under two conditions:

(a) with the CW generator OFF, in which case the output power, P^^, is entirely

noise, and (b) with the CW generator ON, in which case the output power, P2 is a mixture of noise and CW. F^ for the transducer under test is computed from

the known value of F^ and the measured output powers P-^^t ^2m' ^Ix ^2x'

Note 1: Since the measured output powers are used in ratio to each

other to compute F^, the ratios (P^2 /^mi^ ^^"^ ^^x2''^xl^ determined

directly by ratio techniques (e.g., with an attenuator) if desired.

Note 2: This technique may also be performed with an amplitude modulated

signal generator, in which case P^ and P^ are the audio or video powers

of the demodulated signals.

Operating Characteristics

The comparison technique is typically a low-accuracy technique because

of the inherent differences between the master transducer and the transducer

under test. Measurement uncertainties are probably never smaller than 25%

(1 dB) , and typically lie between 30% (1.2 dB) and 100% (3 dB)

48
3

UJ

o

LlJ 1— Q

1—

A

4

^11

1

1

h1—

UJ 00 o

o UJ to 1— •1—S- CO en. fO LU Q.

E

O

1— o

ure

17

_l o

<C I—

13 2: =t

o o q:

1—I UJ

UJ

o

49
1

1 This technique is applicable over a very wide range of frequencies and j noise factor. It is rapid and simple, and requires no special equipment.

It requires only a moderate level of operator skill.

Test Equipment Required

a. CW signal generator

b. Master transducer

c. Power meter

Basic Procedure

1. Arrange the equipment as shown in figure 17.

2. Connect the CW Signal Generator to the Master Transducer's input

port, and the Master Transducer's output port to the Power Meter.

3. Tune the Signal Generator to the measurement frequency, f^.

4. Adjust the output level of the Signal Generator to zero (leave

the Signal Generator connected to the Master Transducer)

5. Measure the power output, from the Master Transducer.

6. Adjust the output level of the Signal Generator to a value that

produces a transducer output power that is approximately 20 dB

above P ,

ml

7. Record the output power, P^, of the Signal Generator.

8. Measure the power output, ^^2' Master Transducer.

9. Disconnect the Signal Generator and the Power Meter from the Master

Transducer, and connect them to the Transducer Under Test.

10. Repeat steps 4 and 5 to obtain Pj^^-

11. Repeat steps 6, 7, and 8 to obtain P Be certain the output power

from the signal generator is P^ , as in step 6.

12. Compute for the Transducer Under Test, in terms for the Master

Transducer, by the equation

50
(P _ p J p , ¥- = ¥- '"^ - "^^ ^ , (28) ^ (P „ P J P T x2 - xl ml

or

13. Cumpute F (dB) and T from equations (14) and (5)

(dB) = 10 logio F^ (14)

T = 290 (F - 1) (5) ex X ^

'

51
I 4 . INSTRUMENTATION |

In this section we will discuss the important characteristics of the instruj ments that are required by the various measurement methods. The availability

or cost of such instruments often determine which method is used.

j 4.1, Noise Generators i

i

Random noise power is generated by a variety of means, but the three basic I types of generators that are commonly used for these measurements are thermal, I shot, and plasma (gas discharge) sources. Each of these sources uses a different

fundamental physical phenomenon, and their operational characteristics are

different. However, the random signals that are produced by each are all nearly j gaussian and therefore equivalent for the purposes of this measurement, at

| least in the frequency ranges of current engineering use. A brief summary j of commercial noise generator characteristics is given in Table II.

j

I 4.1.1. General Features

j

4.1.1.1. Thermal Noise Generators

Operationally, a thermal noise generator uses a resistive termination,

in either hollow [25] or coaxial [26] waveguide, at a controlled temperature,

T, to produce Johnson noise [2 7] according to the relationship

(i) S(f) = hf [exp l^] -- l]-i (30)

where I

S(f) = available noise power per unit bandwidth centered at frequency f

h = Planck's constant, 6.626x10"^'* joule-second

k = Boltzmann's constant, 1.381x10"^^ joule per kelvin.

For frequency-to- temperature ratios, f/T, of less then 10^ hertz per kelvin,

S{f) is approximated by the equation

S(f) = kT . (31)

The noise power, P^, available in a frequency interval (f^^f """^ therefore

52
O

-P

•rH Si rH

g

-rl to >i> T3 "b 0 0 0) u s w s

jh

C nj nS (d n) H rH rH

-r-l rH rH

(0 to (0 -H fd • rl • rH (d X -P >^ hj 4J > (0 U (0: (0 0 O CD Q 0 w u « u u « u Q• r-t +Jw N N

QJ

N

N t-M HM tn tr! M-t d) q; o 4J (0 LO

Oh CO ro [

(0>^

Q 0 0

(0

u 4J 4J 4J

(U

oN

N

N

rj III fT\j —

o Q) f—

+J

(0 r-j rH <N

a) 0 [—

o +J 00 CD

(i5 ;^ jh d)

Cfl <U rH I4_l 00

.,-1 Qi Cvjn ,—

0 & (0 a) o 0 • rl HJ

5h

o a) 4J JH

4-1 ro ><

X 0 d) > 0

U) «. I4_| 4H >1 ^ 0 0 0

(01 3 r~- ro <D rH

(0 ^0 ^0

1—

o\o LO

1—1-

u , 1 u

w

nn\j +j 4J -P 4J

ffl rH

03 cAO Eh u r-l LO ro

.,-( Ci

>i

C_| • rl • rl

(U 'H

a. <D iH Id c: 4J

p

q Eh CO CO Q) 0 (d iH

E-i CM • rH 00

53
or

where

(32)

(33)

(34)

if S(f) is constant over the interval (f-j^f '

The noise temperature, T^, of a thermal noise generator differs from the

thermodynamic temperature, T, of the termination because of losses in the

waveguide that conveys the noise power from the termination to the output

port of the generator. A first-order approximation of this effect is given

by the equation

T = aT + (l-a)T (35) n a

where

a = power efficiency of the waveguide

and

= temperature of the waveguide.

The value of T^ is obtained either by calibration [28], [29] or by calculation

from noise theory, using the physical parameters (temperature, resistivity,

linear dimensions, etc.) of the generator apparatus.

4.1.1.2. Shot Noise Generators

Operationally, a shot noise generator consists of a resistor, R, through

which current from a shot noise source is passed. The shot noise source is

typically a biased diode, either thermionic [30] or semiconductor [31], through

which electrons flow in a random manner [32]

In a thermionic diode operating in the temperature-limited mode, the meansquare fluctuations, i^, in the average (d.c.) emission current, I, is given by

the equation

54.
= 2 e I J $(f) df (36) o

where

e = electron charge, 1. 602x10" '^ coulomb

and <j>(f) = correction factor.

The correction factor cf)(f) accounts for the effects of transit time, operating

frequency, cathode temperature, and cathode-anode potential gradient. It

typically has a value near unity at low frequencies, and decreases towards

zero as frequency increases (see figure 18)

The available power per unit bandwidth, S(f), from a temperature- limited

diode (TLD) generator is given by the equation

S(f) = %eIR(f) + k T^ (37)

where T^ is the thermodynamic temperature of R. The first term on the righthand side of equation (37) is shot noise, and the second term is thermal noise

from R. From the definition of noise temperature, T^, and (37),

T = IIM + T (38)

2k

for a TLD noise generator.

The TLD noise generator can be made very stable by stabilizing I [33].

Also it is particularly easy to vary T^ by adjusting the value of I. However,

because of the great difficulty of evaluating (})(f) from the physical parameters

of the generator circuit [34], the value of T^ must be obtained by calibration

at frequencies where (t)(f) deviates significantly from unity. Depending upon

the accuracy desired, this may occur as low as 100 MHz. Special thermionic

diodes have been designed to provide useful output up to 3 GHz.

At low operating frequencies, (e.g., <10'* hertz), a TLD generator produces

flicker noise in addition to shot and thermal noise. The theory of flicker

or (1/f) noise is not yet well established, so no equations to account for

this effect are given here. For this reason, TLD generators are not normally

used below 10 0 kilohertz.

55
o

Ln

C\J

oa

0)3

cr

(U

4->

O

C\J

No

>-

cr

UJ

o

s-o

+-> o •

Li_ -ao

c: -r- o Q

+-> I— o O) O) I—

S- r—

S- (O o sa. M- I O O)c C fO O I—

•1- Q_

4->(O fO

S- S- ro O I I I J__l I I L

00o

O

o

^-

-e00

(USC7>

56
As indicated by equation (38) , the smallest noise temperature from a TLD

generator is T (1=0), which is typically between 300 and 310 kelvins. Common

thermionic diodes generate shot noise power that is approximately 16 to 20

dB above this level (in 50-ohm systems); i.e., (due to both shot and thermal

noise) reaches approximately 12,0 00 to 29,30 0 kelvins. The latter level is

in excess of that produced by either thermal or plasma (gas discharge) sources.

The theory of shot noise in a semiconductor diode is still in the process

of development [35], and no equations for this source are given here. The

most common source of this noise is from microplasmas that occur when current

is passed through the diode operating in the avalanche mode. Random fluctuations

of this current are passed through a resistor as in the TLD noise generator

to produce a random noise voltage. Semiconductor diodes generate additional

noise by other mechanisms (thermal, recombination, etc.) which adds to the

shot noise power available from these devices.

Because of the low junction voltages involved, a large average current

can be passed through the semiconductor diode with the result that a large

value of T^ can be produced. Values between 10^ and 10^ kelvins have been

reported [36]. However, because of the temperature sensitivity of the semiconductor junction, T^ may be unstable unless special means are used to stabilize this effect.

The transit time in a semiconductor diode is quite small with the result

that the noise spectrum extends into the UHF and SHF ranges (3x10^ to 3x10 '^Hz).

However, the impedance of the mounted diode is usually quite variable with

frequency so that the VSWR of the generator deviates from unity to a significant

amount. To overcome this problem, common practice is to "pad" the output of

the source to stabilize the VSWR. Since the noise temperature of the source

is large to begin with, the loss of power due to padding presents no particular

concern, and typical generators provide noise temperatures from 1000 to 30,000

kelvins with VSWR's of 1.0 2 or less.

Flicker noise is also present in semiconductor noise sources, thus limiting

the lower frequency at which they are used to approximately 10 0 kHz.

At the present state-of-the-art, it is not usual to vary T^ by varying

the current through the semiconductor diode. T^ is determined by calibration

at a specified current and frequency.

57
4.1.1.3. Plasma (Gas Discharge) Noise Generators

This type of noise generator uses the random fluctuations in the electromagnetic fields produced by the ionization of a noble gas confined in a suitable

container. The configuration commonly used is a special form of the fluorescent

lamp [37] filled with either neon or argon at pressures that are chosen according

to the dimensions of the lamp tube. The fluorescent coating is, of course,

omitted.

The noise temperature of a plasma noise generator is approximately the

electron temperature in the ionized gas. However, a definite difference exists

between these two temperatures, and attempts to calculate T^ from the electron

temperature and other physical parameters of the source have been only partially

successful [38]. Thus, T^ of a plasma generator must be obtained by calibration.

Noise temperatures range between approximately 10,000 and 18,000 kelvins,

depending upon the gas, pressure, and dimensional configuration. When operated

from a stabilized excitation power supply, plasma sources are very stable

and repeatable.

The noise generating mechanism for plasma noise is a very wideband phenomenon.-

However, the frequency range over which gas -discharge sources can be used

depends principally upon the method used to couple the electromagnetic fluctua'^ij

tions into a waveguide system.

The important characteristics of noise sources for these measurement techniques include the following considerations:

a. Accuracy

b. Output level

c. Frequency range

d. Stability

The uncertainty in the generator's available noise power may cause a large

measurement error, depending upon the transducer's F or T^ . This can be seen

by examining the uncertainty coefficients in the error equations given in

Section 7, Measurement Errors. Therefore, for high accuracy results, it is

necessary to use a noise source of certified and adequate accuracy. Accuracies

for typical commercial noise generators range from 1% to 15% (see Table II)

The effect of a given generator accuracy may be estimated by means of the

4.1.2. Important Characteristics

4.1.2.1. Accuracy

58
equations given in Section 7 • In some techniques the generator inaccuracy

may be the principal source of measurement error (see Table I)

4.1.2.2. Output Level

The output power level available from the generator may affect the measurement accuracy, and may even determine whether or not a particular measurement

technique can be used.

Generally speaking, best results are obtained with the Y-factor technique

when the source noise temperatures bracket T^ according to the relation [25]

T~ = /T tT . (39) e c h

Thus the measurement system for a transducer having a large T^ should use

a hot noise generator having a large T^ . Similarly, if T^ is small, T^ should

be low. Otherwise, the measurement system may lack sufficient sensitivity

for an accurate measurement. The same applies to the 3-dB and Gain Control

Techniques using a fixed- level source. All three types of noise sources (thermal, shot, and plasma) are suitable for use in these methods. However, thermal

noise sources are limited in their maximum noise power, and both shot and

plasma noise sources are limited in their minimum power levels (see Table

II) . Some selection can be made, therefore, to obtain the best source temperature for a particular measurement situation.

The 3-dB and Gain Control variable source methods require noise generators

having an adjustable output level. At the present time, only temperaturelimited diode shot noise generators are generally available with this feature.

Further, the output level must be sufficient for the value of F being measured.

Commercial units are suitable for measuring F(dB) up to 16 dB or 20 dB, depending

upon the type of noise diode that is used.

The maximum F that can be measured by the automatic noise figure meter technique increases as the noise temperature of the higher temperature source

increases. On the other hand, in some ANFM designs the resolution and accuracy

for the lower values of F improve as this noise source temperature decreases.

Therefore, when a choice is available, choose the proper noise source according

to the value of F that is expected.

In any of the techniques using fixed-level noise generators, there will be

an optimum pair of noise source temperatures for a given value of F or T^.

Situations where the highest accuracy and precision are required may warrant

the extra effort required to determine those temperatures, and to acquire

sources that generate them accurately.
4.1.2.3. Frequency Range

For best measurement accuracy, the noise power should be constant with

frequency over the ranges of frequencies passed by the transducer. All noise

sources exhibit some variation in either their available or delivered power,

and for high accuracy measurements this must be taken into account.

The frequency range of thermal noise sources is generally very wide. It

is normally limited by the transmission system that connects the noise generating element to the generator output port. Corrections for this transmission

effect are given by the manufacturer of the thermal noise generator. Although

thermal noise changes with frequency due to the quantum effect accordinq

to (30) , this effect is not great enough to be seen by present-day equipment.

Plasma noise sources are believed to have a constant frequency spectrum

over a large range, but the method of mounting noise tubes in helixes or in

hollow waveguide causes their frequency range to be restricted to a moderately

narrow band. This problem is met by building sources for individual segments

of the frequency spectrum, and such sources are commercially available for

a wide range of frequencies . Accurate measurements do require corrections

within a given band segment, however.

The upper frequency range of shot noise generators is significantly limited

by the transit time effect in TLD noise sources (less so in solid state sources)

and is further limited by the parasitic reactances in the noise generator

circuit package. Therefore, exercise care in choosing a shot noise source for

use at high frequencies.

A further precaution must be exercised when choosing a noise source for

measurements at very low frequencies. Thermal noise sources are generally

satisfactory, but some shot noise generators contain a large amount of flicker

(1/f) noise. Select a generator that has been designed for use at low frequencies .

4.1.2.4. Stability

Noise sources must be stable for best measurement results. Thermal noise

sources must be adequately designed to assure a constant noise temperature that

is insensitive to normal variations in the measurement environment (temperature,

atmospheric pressure, power supply fluctuations, etc.). Corrections may be

required as indicated by the manufacturer. As an example, the noise temperature

of a liquid nitrogen cooled source will fluctuate with changes in atmospheric

pressure. This may amount to one or two kelvins for elevation changes between

sea level and 5000 feet.

60
Shot and plasma noise sources can be stabilized by stabilizing the emission,

junction, or discharge current. Some commercial sources incorporate this

feature; others do not. Stabilization factors greater than 1000:1 are possible,

and are adequate for most purposes. Thermal stabilization may also be required,

particularly with solid state and plasma sources.

The noise power from plasma sources may not be stable under pulsed conditions.

Specially designed noise tubes are available for this type of service.

Several measurement techniques require a shot or plasma noise source to

supply thermal noise in an "OFF" condition. Such a source should be designed

so that the thermal noise power is stable and predictable, as discussed in

Section 5.2.

The source impedance (or reflection coefficient) of a source should be

constant under conditions that require it to be pulsed or tuned on and off.

This is particularly important for a transducer whose F or T^ is sensitive

to its input termination impedance.

Finally, noise sources must be adequately shielded and filtered to prevent

extraneous signals from entering the measurement system and altering the source's

apparent noise temperature. See also Section 5.5.

4.2. CW Signal Generators

In noise performance measurements, CW signal generators are used for two

purposes: (a) as a source of reference power, and (b) to determine noise

bandwidth. The first application requires a known output level of CW power;

therefore, the generator must either have a calibrated output indicator, or

the output must be measured by some means. The second application requires

the output level to be adjustable in known amounts; this also requires either

a calibrated output indicator, or a calibrated attenuator. Laboratory CW signal

generators usually have these features, and are generally applicable to the

CW technique.

A further requirement is accurate frequency calibration. If the chosen

generator does not provide sufficient accuracy, a precision frequency meter,

either digital or cavity type, can be used to measure the signal frequency.

Adequate shielding and signal purity are essential. These should be checked

by conventional means to be certain that harmonics or spurious signals do

not degrade the measurement results.

61
The Tangential technique requires that the CW signal be 100% square-wave

modulated. The duty factor of the square wave is not highly important; however,

it should be near 50% and must be stable for best results. An adjustable modulation frequency is a convenience in the measurement, but the exact frequency

is not so important as long as a crisp, stable display can be obtained on the oscilloscope.

4.3. Power Meters

Several of these techniques require a power meter to measure the noise

and/or CW power delivered by the transducer. Because of the characteristics

of noise signals, the power meter must meet the requirements given below.

4.3.1. True Power

The power meter must measure the true power in the signal regardless of

waveform. This requires (a) a true power response, (b) a bandwidth sufficient

to pass all frequency components delivered by the transducer, and (c) a dynamic

range sufficient to respond to noise peaks without significant distortion. The

bolometer-type power meter meets these requirements for most frequency ranges

from below 10 MHz to over 60 GHz. Rectifier-type power meters, that are

intended to measure CW power, are unsuitable for this application except when

crude measurements of low accuracy are acceptable.

4.3.2. Accuracy

As shown in Section 8 , the uncertainty in the power meter reading contributes

a large amount of the total measurement uncertainty for certain techniques

Therefore, for high accuracy results, it is necessary to use a power meter of

certified and adequate accuracy. Unless it has been calibrated recently, the

meter's accuracy may be as poor as 10%, whereas a 2% to 5% accuracy is typical

of calibrated meters.

4.3.3. Sensitivity

The power meter must be capable of giving a reliable reading of transducer

output power for the lowest levels involved, e.g., when a cryogenically-cooled

noise source is connected to a low-noise amplifier of low gain. If the power

meter has perceptible internal noise, correction of the reading may be desirable

depending upon the desired measurement accuracy. See Section 5.7 for methods of

making this correction. Further, if the power meter sensitivity is insufficient to provide a reliable reading, an amplifier must be used between it and

the transducer. In this case, the measurement results may be corrected (as

6.2
explained in Section 5,7) for the noise contribution of the amplifier, when

significant

Sensitivities in the range of 0.01 to 10 milliwatts full scale are commonly

suitable for these measurements.

4.3.4. Bandwidth

The CW bandwidth of the power meter should normally be greater than that

of the transducer under test. However, if it is desired to make the measurement

within a bandwidth that is smaller than that of the transducer, the power meter

may be selected with this narrower bandwidth, or a filter may be used as described

below in Section 4.7.1. In the former case, the frequency response of the power

meter must be known in order to properly interpret the measurement results

(see Section 5.7.4.).

The bandwidth of bolometer-type power meters is normally very wide, e.g.,

from 10 MHz to over 10 GHz, depending upon the bolometer mount. Other types,

such as the calorimeter type, extend to d.c.

4.4. Signal Level Indicators

In several of these measurement techniques, an uncalibrated output level

indicator may be used because a measurement of output power is not required.

Suitable instruments for this purpose include radio receivers, broad band

voltmeters, and other sensitive detectors of various types.

Inasmuch as the signal level indicator serves only to indicate a fixed

level of output noise power, its detector law is not important. However,

it must be stable for the time required to make a measurement, and it must

have sufficient sensitivity and bandwidth. These requirements are generally

the same as for power meters (see Sections 4.3.3. and 4.3.4.).

4.5. Attenuators

4.5.1. Precision Variable Attenuators

For use in the Y-factor/attenuation and the 3-dB and gain control fixed source

methods, choose a variable attenuator with the following characteristics:

4.5.1.1. Accuracy

High attenuator accuracy is important because the attenuator error can

be a large part of the total measurement error (see Section 8) . Attenuator
uncertainties of 0.5 dB to 2 dB per 10 dB are typical, and uncertainties as small as 0.1 dB per 10 dB are possible in highly stable, recently calibrated

attenuators . The contribution of a given attenuator uncertainty to the overall

measurement uncertainty are discussed in Sections 7 and 8.

4.5.1.2. Range

A change in attenuation of 20 dB is sufficient for the transducers normally

encountered and the noise sources normally used. This can be seen from equation

(40); the minimum change will occur when T^ is very large, and the maximum

will occur when T^ is very small. In the latter case, Y approaches the ratio

^hot'^'^^cold'

^'^'^'^ -"-^ normally no greater than 100 (20dB) .

T T

Y = Jlot_jL_g^

cold + e

When measuring large values of Y, accuracy can be improved by using a fixed

precision attenuator in series with a variable attenuator. The fixed attenuator

is chosen such that the variable attenuator is used over only a small portion of

its range. In this way, the variable attenuator error is kept small and hence

also the total attenuator error.

4.5.1.3. Bandwidth

Bandwidth requirements are similar to those discussed for a power meter

(see Section 4.3.4.) . If the bandwidth is so narrow as to affect the measurement

bandwidth of the system (rather than the transducer bandwidth being the limiting

factor) the frequency response of the attenuator must be known in order to

properly interpret the measurement results (see Section 5.7.4.).

The bandwidth of resistive-type variable attenuators is normally very wide,

e.g., dc to over 1 GHz. Other types, such as directional coupler and waveguidebelow-cutoff types, have narrower bandwidths that typically range from 5%

to over 100% of their design frequency.

4.5.2. Precision Fixed Attenuators

For use in the 3-dB technique, the requirements of accuracy and bandwidth

are generally the same as given for variable attenuators. The potential accuracy

of a fixed attenuator is normally greater than for a variable attenuator, with

uncertainties as small as 0.0 5 dB in 3 dB attainable. To get high accuracy,

take care that the termination impedances match the characteristic impedance

of the attenuator. Otherwise the insertion attenuation will not be equal to

the expected value.

64
4.6. Amplifiers

When the gain of the transducer under test is insufficient to provide proper

operation of the indicator in a given measurement set-up, additional gain must

be supplied by auxiliary amplifiers. The important considerations are as follows

a. Gain

b. Dynamic range

c. Noise factor

d. Bandwidth

4.6.1. Gain

The gain of the auxiliary amplifier must of course be sufficient to provide

proper operation of the measurement system. However, when a gain control is

provided, make certain that it does not degrade the noise figure of the amplifier,

as might occur if the control were an input attenuator or a bias setting on an input tube or transistor. Also, make certain that no automatic gain control

(AGC, AVC) circuits are in operation; otherwise, the amplifier gain is not

constant with signal level, and the measurement results are meaningless.

Gain requirements for auxiliary amplifiers range from 10 dB to 120 dB . These

requirements can often be met with generally available amplifiers. However,

in special cases a custom amplifier may be required, or a duplicate of the

transducer under test can be pressed into service.

4.6.2. Dynamic Range

Due care must be given to the choice of an auxiliary amplifier to make certain

that it does not overload or significantly clip the noise peaks that it is

required to pass [39], [40]. The measurement error caused by clipping generally

increases as the clipping threshold level decreases. A normally safe practice is

to select an auxiliary amplifier with a distortion-free CW power handling

capability that is 10 dB greater than the average noise power that is to be

delivered by the amplifier.

4.6.3. Noise Factor

The auxiliary amplifier should have a small value of F or T^ for the reasons

discussed in Section 5.7.3. Generally speaking, noise factors from 3 dB to 20 dB

greater than the transducer under test are permissible, depending upon the transducer's gain and noise factor. If the latter parameters are large, the auxiliary

amplifier's noise factor need not be small.
4,6.4. Bandwidth

As discussed in Section 5.7.4., it is generally best to select an auxiliary

amplifier with a bandwidth that is comparable to (e.g., from one to three

times) the bandwidth of the transducer under test. When the transducer noise

figure is fairly constant with frequency over its operating range, the auxiliary

amplifier bandwidth may be narrower without serious effect. When the transducer

noise figure and/or gain are large, the auxiliary amplifier bandwidth may

be larger without serious effect.

4.7. Filters

Filters for noise measurements fall into two classes: "pre-detection" and

"post-detection" filters. Pre-detection filters are used to establish the

location and bandwidth of the measured noise power in the frequency domain.

Post-detection filters are used to establish the time-constant of the

measurement system indicator. Each class of filters is discussed below.

4.7.1. Pre-Detection Filters

Pre-detection filters may be bandpass, band stop, high pass or low pass

filters, depending on the required application. They may be located at a variety of places in the measurement system as shown in figure 19.

A bandpass, high pass, or low pass filter would be located at position A

to limit the noise power entering a superheterodyne transducer via the image

or principal response frequencies , depending upon which noise factor is to be

measured, so as to obtain a "single-sideband" noise factor rather than a "double-sideband" noise factor. A band pass filter would be located at positions B and/or C to restrict the measurement bandwidth to less than the transducer bandwidth if, for example, it were desired to measure a more nearly "spot"

noise factor (see Appendix A) at one or more frequencies within the pass band

of the transducer. A band pass filter would be located at position C to

restrict the bandwidth of a very wide band auxiliary amplifier when it is

greater than the transducer bandwidth or the desired measurement bandwidth (see

Section 5.7.4.).

A band stop filter would be located at any of the three positions to reject

a narrow-band signal, such as a CW signal, which might be present, as, for

example, when a measurement is to be made with the transducer in an operating

system (on-line testing)

66
a: <11>_) 11UJI

ai * > h-1 VI/ 1—

1 \ -f—

Li-

•r~ i Ll_ O

>-

LjJ .1

\ T—

<c 1—

o 1—

u_ U.I _J 1—

•t—

1—

_J CD

X

Q

rD 1 < «=c d)r ; ' ' r>-

OL 1 1 LlJ 1— C/) _l1—

Ll_ •rTM > fd

C\

_j

1—

UJ 1 o LU

I— /--\

CC

LU (/) Q o

2: Q.

\— rD i r— Q

f\\

UJ

1-_J C7) 1—) •r— u IiiIm t

q:o

O 1—<

LU

LU

1—

O LU

Ci3

67
other applications of pre-detection filters will become apparent upon

study of the system conditions and measurement requirements.

4.7.2. Post-Detection Filters

Post-detection filters are used primarily to obtain maximum measurement

accuracy. In most measurement systems, the relative error, 6P/P, in the

measurement or indication of noise power is given by the general relationship

P /^T

where B is the pre-detection measurement bandwidth and t is the post-detection

time constant. Thus an increase in post-detection system time constant will

produce a decrease in the measurement uncertainty.

Time constant x can be increased in a variety of ways; for example:

1) Choose a power meter having a mechanical movement with a long

time constant.

2) Insert on large time constant RC network between detector

and indicator.

3) Use an integrator, either electrical or mechanical, in

the detector output.

4) Use a strip chart recorder to display the detector

output, and average the output graphically.

Improved accuracy by these means is obtained at the sacrifice of measurement

speed. Given a pre-detection bandwidth, the metrologist must balance the

trade-off of accuracy versus the economics of speed for his particular

measurement situation.

4.8. Impedance Bridge/Reflectometer

To assure an accurate measurement of F or T^, the terminal impedances as a function of frequency should be measured for both the signal sources and

the transducer input. This accomplishes two things: CI) It reveals any

discrepancies between the desired source impedance and the actual source

impedance (s) of the generators. (2) It reveals any deviations of input

impedance from the design specification of the transducer. With this information,

corrections can be applied to account for the actual impedance conditions

prevailing during the measurement.

68
Measurement of source impedance can usually be made by common techniques

with no need to observe special precautions. However, measuring the input

impedance of an active transducer often requires a system which applies only

a very small signal to the transducer input port in order to insure that the

impedance remains unchanged from its normal operating value during the

measurement. This requires either a very sensitive bridge/ref lectometer

detector or a sensitive vector impedance meter.

69
5. PRACTICAL MEASUREMENT PROBLEMS

In actual practice, many circumstances complicate the idealized situations

described in Section 3. We now discuss the nature and effects of these

complications

5.1. Source Impedance

Noise factor is not a constant of the transducer; it changes with the source

impedance, Z^, of the signal source. For example, a given transducer will not

have the same F when fed from a 45-ohm resistive source as when fed from a 50-ohm resistive source, all other conditions being kept the same. Nor will the

transducer have the same F when fed from a 50 + jO-ohm source as when fed from

a 50 + j5-ohm source. Therefore, source impedance must be established and known

before a meaningful measurement of F can be made. Further, if the source

impedances of the noise or CW sources are not the same as the required source

impedance, the measurement result will be in error [41].

Experimental evidence and approximation models 1 42 J indicate that F is

a hyperbolic function of Z^, and that a minimum F exists at some particular value

of Z^, viz., Z^(opt).

The amount of measurement error, 6F, in F due to the source impedance effect

depends upon the individual transducer. Typically, 6F ranges from 0% to

10% of F as Z varies from Z (opt)

s s

A measurement error occurs in the Y-factor methods when the source impedances

of and T^ are equal to each other but different from the required source

impedance [43] . Another possibility is for the source impedances of Tj^ and T^

to be different from each other, with either one or the other, or neither, being

equal to the required source impedance [44]

Another aspect of the problem has to do with the variation of source

impedance with frequency. Suppose we require the transducer to operate from a given source, such as an antenna, whose source impedance varies over the range

of frequencies passed by the transducer. We desire the F of the transducer for

this condition. To measure F with maximum accuracy the source impedances of

both Tj^ and T^ must duplicate that of the antenna over the frequency range of

the transducer. Measurement error occurs when either or both impedance functions

deviate from that of the antenna.

70
5.2. Input Termination Temperature

Because F is defined only when the noise temperature of the transducer's

input termination is standard (290 K) , many commercial noise figure meters are

calibrated for this condition. Also, the working eauations found in the literature are often written for this condition. However, this condition seldom

exists in practice, and the measurement results are therefore in error. For

non-critical situations, this error is often ignored, but high-accuracy measurements require correcting for this effect. The measurement techniques

affected by this condition include the following:

a. 3-dB Technique (Variable Source Method)

b. Automatic Noise Figure Meter Technique

c. Gain Control Technique (Variable Source Method)

d. CW Technique

e. Tangential Technique

Not all manufacturers of TLD noise generators provide guidance in their

instruction manuals to correct for this effect. On the other hand, the manufacturers of high quality automatic noise figure meters usually provide such

information. In the CW and Tangential techniques, the metrologist is on his

own. Normally, this effect is ignored in the Tangential technique, which is

inherently a low-accuracy technique.

The relationship between the measured value, F^, of noise factor and the

true value, F, is given by the equation

_ T

F = F +1 —, (42) ^ 290

where T^ is the noise temperature of the input termination connected to the

transducer under test. For example, if a commercial TLD noise source is used

in the 3-dB technique, the meter reading will be F^ (dB) . The true noise

factor in decibels, is found by converting F^ (dB) to a numeric ratio by

equation (18) , adding the quantity

T

1

- 290

and converting this result to true noise factor (in decibels) by equation

(14). In the case of commercial ANFM's (42) is incorporated into the

manufacturer's instructions for finding the true noise factor. The working

equations of Section 6 include the correction given by (42)
T is frequently difficult to evaluate. Suggested techniques include the

Si following: (a) Estimate T from a temperature measurement of the interior of

a the noise or CW generator. (b) When accessible, directly measure the physical

temperature (s) of the components comprising the source impedance with a thermocouple or other suitable sensor. (c) Directly measure the noise temperature at

the generator's output port with a noise radiometer [45]. This method requires

equipment not normally available. (d) Use a WAG.

5.3. TLD Frequency Correction

When a temperature- limited diode (TLD) is used for measurements at very high

frequencies, the correction factor, (f)(f), (see Section 4.1.1.2.) may have a significant effect upon the measurement results. Manufacturers of TLD noise

generators usually treat this effect in one of two ways: (a) some place an

upper frequency limit on their instruments, above which the specified accuracy

no longer holds; (b) others supply a correction curve for correcting the measured

value of F as a function of frequency. Either procedure is satisfactory as long

as the instrument is within specifications. However, for critical work at the

higher frequencies, the noise generator should be calibrated [28], [29] or

otherwise compared against a known source [45]

With diodes mounted in the conventional T-5% glass envelope or similar

construction (e.g.. Type 5722), TLD noise generators can be designed to have a constant noise temperature with frequency up to 100 or 200 MHz, and to be

within 10% of their low frequency value up to 400 or 500 MHz but falling off

rapidly thereafter. Using the special TT-1 coaxial construction (Type 6144),

the useful range is extended, and the noise temperature may be within 50% of its

low frequency value up to 3 GHz . Solid state noise diodes maintain their low

frequency output level to even higher frequencies (see Section 4.1.1.2.).

5.4. Non-Linearity

Non-linearity in the transducer may cause either a positive or a negative

error in the measured value of F or T^, depending upon the cause of the nonlinearity. Typical causes of non-linearity are (a) voltage amplitude limiting,

(b) square-law behavior of circuit elements, and (c) feedback. When amplitude

limiting occurs, the Y-factor may be smaller than for a linear transducer

of the same T^ because of the relatively greater clipping of the noise peaks

from Tj^ than from T^ (see equation (40)). In the case of positive feedback

where transducer gain increases with signal amplitude, the opposite may be

true

72
In addition to the above non-linear effects which are manifest as

variations in the effective power gain of the transducer^ non-linear phenomena may also change the actual value of T^. That is, may be a function

of signal level. An example is a transistor or mixer diode whose noisiness

varies with signal amplitude.

The amount of error introduced into the measured value of T^ by transducer

non-linearity cannot be readily predicted without detailed knowledge of the

transducer. However, for typical well-designed transducers, the error is

generally less than 5%.

An estimate of this error can be made by measuring T^with several differing

values of T^^ and plotting on a chart. A trend away from a constant T^ may

indicate a significant non-linear effect.

5.5. Leakage and Shielding

Extraneous electromagnetic energy may cause error in the measured value

of T if it is able to enter the measurement system because of inadequate

e shielding or filtering. If the same amount of extraneous energy enters when

either T, or T are connected to the transducer the measured value of Y will

h c be smaller than if no extraneous energy is present. This is because

[k (T, + T ) B + P ]G k (T + T ) BG

< ii S = Y (43)

[k (T + T ) B + P ]G k (T + T^) BG

c e X c e

where P^ is the extraneous power referred to the input port of the transducer.

On the other hand, if the leakage through Tj^ is different from that through

T^, the measured value of Y may fall either less than or greater than the

value obtained in the absence of the extraneJous energy.

To be certain that extraneous signals are not a source of error, follow

one or more of the following procedures: (1] Perform the measurement in a shielded enclosure of known integrity. (2) Test for leakage into the measurement

system by deliberately attempting to introduce energy from a medium power

signal source. (3) Display the output signal from the transducer on an oscilloscope and inspect for any periodic waveforms. (4) Check for interference

produced within the measurement apparatus itself, e.g., timing circuits in

digital power meter.

73
5.6 . Spurious Responses

The ideal two-port transducer power gain function, G(f), has a form that is

optimum for the particular transmitted signal. G(f) is zero at frequencies

where the signal is zero, and its value at signal frequencies is shaped for

best signal-to-noise ratio. However, most real-world transducers have gain at

other than signal frequencies which may give rise to iindesired or spurious

responses. The most common such response for narrow-band communications

systems is the image response of a superheterodyne receiver. Responses can be

caused by energy at other than the image frequency band because of transducer

non-linearity, instability, leakage, or impure heterodyning signals.

For transducers having spurious responses, the total output noise power,

N^^, contains energy originating at frequencies other than within the principalfrequency transformation (s) of the system. Therefore, N^^ may be larger than for

a similar transducer having no spurious responses, and the measured value of F may

differ from the true value of F, depending upon whether a broad band or narrow

band technique is used. N^^ is given by the equation

(44) N

on

= k/°°(T + T ) G(f ) df

•'on e

ere T is the noise temperature of the signal source. Assuming T and T

n n e wh

are constant with frequency (44) can be approximated by the equation

N = k(T + T ) [(GB) + (GB) . + (GB) , + (GB) „ + , . . 1 , (45)

on ne|_p i J- ^ J

where

(GB) = G(f) df (46)

P fp

is the area under the gain function over the band of frequencies that is the

transducer's principal-frequency transformation,

(GB) . = X. G(f ) df (47)

1 f1

is the area under the gain function over the transducer's image- frequency band,

and

(GB)^ = 5^^ G(f) df (48)

(GB)2 = ^^^^ ^'^^^

etc . ,
are the areas under the gain function over the transducer's spurious-frequency

bands. From the definition of average noise factor, the transducer with spurious

responses has a larger F than an equivalent spurious-free transducer because

N „ > k(T^ + O (GB)^. (50) on n e p

This also follows from Note 1 of the IEEE definition, (see Appendix A)

If the measurement technique treats the spurious response frequencies as signal channels, as might be the case with broad band techniques, the measured

noise factor will in general be smaller than that obtained by a narrow band

technique. For example, consider a transducer having gain in only the principaland image- frequency bands and at no other spurious response frequencies. The

single channel noise factor, F^ , is given by

k(T + T ) [(GB) + (GB) . ^ | - o e' L P ij

If

then

F = ^ 1 . (51)

k T (GB) o p

(GB)p = (GB)^ , (52)

2 k(T + T ) (GB)

F„ = 2 ^= _E^ = 2 (•?) I 1 + J . (53)

kT (GB) o P

A broad band measurement technique would measure the double channel noise factor,

F^, where _ k(T

F^ =

+ T ) ((GB) + (GB) . 1 T

[(GB) + (GB) .] o L p 1

d

=

r T~ = -L + — • (54) kT (GB) + (GB) .] T

From (53) and (54) ,

o

F^ = 2 F^ . (55)

If the desired noise factor is F^, the measurement result, F^, will be in error

by a factor of two. Note that, in general, F , may range in value from fT to

s cl (or greater) depending upon the relative transducer gain in the imagefrequency band. Thus the popular concept that F^ (dB) is always 3 dB greater

than F^(dB) is correct only when (GB)^ equals (GB) .

75
5.7. System Gain

It is not uncommon to proceed to measure the F of an amplifier only to find

that there is insufficient gain in the measurement system to give an adequate

display on the output indicator. For example, commercial automatic noise

figure meters typically require a minimum signal level of -6 0 to -70 dBm

for proper operation. Or your particular power meter may require several

milliwatts to obtain a reliable reading. In such cases, auxiliary amplifiers

must be used.

Several factors must be borne in mind when selecting an auxiliary

amplifier

a

Gain; gain stability

b. Dynamic range

cNoise factor

d. Frequency response

eInput impedance

f Spurious generation of signals

5.7.1. Gain

Select an auxiliary amplifier to have adequate gain stability as well as adequate gain. Short-term stability is adequate for the automatic, tangential,

and comparison techniques, but longer-term stability may be required for the

other non-automatic techniques [46] . In general, the measurement uncertainty,

in percent, due to gain fluctuations, will be approximately equal to twice

the gain fluctuation (gain uncertainty) , in percent.

5.7.2. Dynamic Range

The comments of Section 4.6.2. apply also to auxiliary amplifiers.

Clipping is often a greater problem here because of the larger signals passed

by the auxiliary amplifier.

5.7.3. Noise Factor

When two twoport transducers are connected in cascade (see figure 20) , the

overall noise factor, F , is given by the equation [47]

1 2 — (GB) . (GB) = F" LIE + (F~ - 1) ^, (56)

12 1 (GB) ^

2 (GB)

1 2S 1 2S

76
77
where F and F are the narrow band average noise factors for the first and

1 2 second transducers, respectively. The gain-bandwidth products, (GB) . , (GB) , i2t las

and ( GB ) , ^ ^

2t, are as follows:

CO (GB) = /g (f) df, (57)

1 2 1 1 2

where G (f) is the overall gain function of the two cascaded transducers, and

1 2 (GB) . is the total area under this gaia function.

1 2t

(GB) ^ = /, G (f) df, (58)

1 2S rS 12

where (GB) ^ is the area under G (f) for only the frequency range(s), f^,

that includes the system signal (see Section 2.1).

(GB) . = / G (f) df, (59) 2t 2

where G (f) is the gain function of the second transducer, and (GB) , is the

2 2 t

total area under this gain function.

Equation (56) shows that the contribution of Fi and F2 to the measured

noise factor, F12, is affected by the gain-bandwidth products, GB, of the

individual transducers. For transducers each having gain in only one

frequency band, the ratio (GB) ^/GB » by which F~ is multiplied, reduces

1 2 L. 1 2S 1 to unity . That is ,.

(GB) , = (GB) ^. (60)

1 2t 1 2S

In general, however, for multiple-response transducers, the ratio is

greater than unity, i.e.,

(GB) . > (GB) ^. (61)

1 at 1 2S

78
For transducers with gain in only one and exactly the same frequency range,

the ratio (GB) ./(GB) ^, by which (F~ - 1) is multiplied, reduces to

21- 1 2S 2 1/ G , that is,

1

(GB) ^ = G~ (GB) . , (62)

1 2S 1 2t

where G^ is the average gain of the first transducer in the frequency interval

f s ; viz..

In general, however, this ratio may range in value from a lower limit of 1/Gi

to a large value without limit (infinity) , depending upon the shapes of Gi (f)

and Gz (f ) (see Section 5.7.4. below).

In the simple cases where (60) and (62) apply, (56) becomes

F~ - 1

F = F + -2 , (64)

12 1 Q1

which is the relationship commonly found in the literature [11], [13], [18].

From the above discussion, it can be readily seen that F is usually

1 2 greater than F , and that the difference between these two quantities is

determined by the relative sizes of F and F and by the characteristics of

1 2 G (f) cind G (f ) . If F and G (f) are small, or if G is large, the measured.

1 2 2 2 1 value of F may be very nearly equal to F , which is sought. It is therefore

12 1 pxnoident to select an auxiliary amplifier with as small an F as possible. When

G is small, or when f~ is large, the value of F~ for the transducer under test

I 2 ' 1 can be computed from the measured values of F , F and G by the relationship

12 2 1

F~ - 1

F = F - , (65)

1 1 2

if the conditions for (64) prevail. Otherwise use (56)

79
An analysis of two cascaded twoport transducers in terms of effective input

noise temperature would show that, for the simple case where (64) applies, the

overall average effective input noise temperature, T , is given by

e 1 2

T

e2 T = T + ei2 ei

^ . (66)

1

The extension of the cascading equations, (64) and (66), to more than two

transducers is, for the simple case, straight forward. It is seldom necessary

to go beyond the two transducer case when measuring F or T^, however. For

further information about multiple cascading, the reader is referred to

references [13] or [18],

5.7.4. Frequency Response

The frequency response of an auxiliary amplifier can alter the measurement

results according as it includes a narrower or wider range of frequencies than

that of the transducer under test. The shape of the amplifier's gain function,

G2 (f ) , in conjunction with the transducer's gain function, Gi (f )

, determines the

frequencies that are involved in the measurement of F and T

1 e X

It goes without saying that the auxiliary amplifier must have gain in the

frequency range of the output power from the transducer under test. If such is

not the case because of an oversight or misunderstanding, the gain-bandwidth

product (GB)i2s of (56) will be very small or zero and f77 will be a very large

value. An apparent measurement can be obtained, but the computed value of Fi may

be completely unreliable.

If the auxiliary amplifier has gain in only one frequency range whose width

is narrower than that of the transducer, Fi 2 becomes a narrow band noise factor

whose value pertains to the frequency range passed by the measurement system. In

this case, the measurement frequency range is determined primarily by the amplifier rather than by the transducer (assuming of course, that other parts of the

system, such as the power meter and attenuators, do not narrow the frequency

range). In general, the measured value of Fi for the transducer may then vary

according to the center frequency and width of the auxiliary amplifier's frequency response, depending upon how FT varies with frequency. If fT is constant

with frequency over the transducer's frequency range, it may be measured anywhere within this range and with any practical measurement bandwidth without

obtaining a variation in its measured value.

80
If the auxiliary amplifier has gain in frequency ranges in addition to those

passed by the transducer, f7 may be difficult to determine because, depending

upon f7 and G2 (f )

, the output power from the amplifier may consist largely of

noise originating within the auxiliary amplifier. In this case, the measured

value of fTT is comparatively insensitive to the value of Fi . This can be seen

from (56); the gain-bandwidth product (GB) may be very large, and it would

dominate the right-hand term rather than the transducer gain Gi (f ) , which enters

via the qain-bandwidth product (GB) (compare equation (63)). The result is a

^ 1 2S

potentially large error in Fi , as can be seen by rearranging (56) as follows:

Fi = Fi

(GB) _ (GB)

_ (f7"2 - 1)

2t

^ (GB) . (GB) 12t Izt

Both terms on the right-hand side of (67) will be large, and they will be nearly

equal. Therefore, a small relative error in either term will produce a large

relative error in f7.

From the above discussion, it can be appreciated that the auxiliary

amplifier selected should have a frequency response that is similar to that of

the transducer under test. In general, it should not be narrower unless a specific narrow band noise factor measurement is desired, and it should not be

a great amount wider unless G (f) is large and both F and G (f) are small. A

frequency response that is from

1 one to three times wider22

than that of the

transducer under test is usually satisfactory for the normal measurement

situation.

5.7.5. Input Impedance

The input impedance of the auxiliary amplifier affects the measured value

of F inasmuch as it affects G (f) [48]. Normally, measurement difficulties

1 1 are minimized when this impedance matches the output impedance of the transducer

under test, and a transmission line of the same impedance is used to connect

the two units.

5.7.6. Spurious Generation of Signals

The auxiliary amplifier must be stable and free of spurious signal sources.

Check out the amplifier before using it.

5-8. Gain Stability

Short-term gain variations in the transducer under test can cause

measurement errors in all of the techniques described in this Guide. The

81 .
automatic Y-factor technique, and automated power or attenuator methods tend to

reduce this effect when the switching rate is fast compared with the rate of

gain fluctuations. Very high-gain transducers can be particularly difficult to

measure. For example, in one case of a low noise 30 MHz IF amplifier having

7 8 dB gain, repeated measurement resulted in data spread over a range of 2 to

1. This was traced to gain changes caused by (1) unstable feedback due to

leakage between the input, output, and power cables, and (2) variations in

source impedance due to faulty connectors. Had only a single measurement been

made, this phenomenon would not have been apparent.

5.9. Connectors and Cables

A prevalent problem source in noise measurements is the means by which

networks are connected together in the measurement system. Connectors, cables

and waveguide can contribute to leakage, mismatch, losses, and change of

frequency response. Accurate measurements cannot be made unless proper

selection of these components is made.

5.9.1. Connectors

When the transducer under test is fitted at both its input and output

ports with good connectors, problems generally arise only when making precision

measurements. Otherwise, other sources of error usually predominate. In

precision measurements, connectors must be carefully selected and installed.

When the transducer under test is not fitted with connectors, new problems

arise which often require ingenuity to solve. The most common problem occurs

when the signal to be measured must be extracted from the transducer at a point

where no connector has been provided, such as the input to the detector in a receiver. When such a point is actually inaccessible, either (1) an alternate

point must be chosen, (2) an alternate measurement technique must be used which

allows the detector and post-detector circuits to be included in the measurement

system, or (3) give up. If the desired extraction point is accessible, a connection technique must be used that either (1) insignificantly alters the

circuit conditions in the transducer, or (2) alters conditions in a known way

so that corrections can be made in the measurement results. Successful

connection methods include the following:

(1) High impedance circuit: - Capacitively couple from the point of

measurement. Use a matching network if necessary. In tube circuits using glass

tubes, fit a connector to a tube shield that is modified so as not to contact

chassis ground. Disconnect input to receiver detector, or otherwise isolate

the measured signal from being affected by the detector.

82
(2) Low impedance circuit: - Inductively couple or use a resistance

matching network. Locate the ground return with care to minimize undesired

ground loop interactions

(3) Miscellaneous: - (a) Devise a connector to plug in place of the tube or

transistor at the stage where the measurement is made. (b) Install a connector

on the chassis near the point of measurement, and connect to the circuit

through a suitable coupling/matching network.

5.9.2. Cables and Waveguide

An ideal measurement system has no interconnecting cables or waveguide.

Practical systems, however, usually require a line from the signal source to

the transducer input port, and from the transducer output port to the remainder

of the measurement system. Serious measurement errors can be caused by

improper choice and installation of these lines. Many of the measurement

problems discussed in this section can be minimized by (1) using the shortest

length practicable; (2) using the correct characteristic impedance; (3) using

high-quality, low-loss, lines; (4) properly installing the correct connectors

on the lines.

5 . 10 . Detection

Proper attention must be given to detection in the measurement system

if the desired measurement results are to be obtained. Detector requirements

are not the same for all of the techniques discussed above. Some transducers,

such as voltage and power amplifiers, do not have built-in detectors; others,

such as receivers, include detectors of which there is a variety of types

(envelope, square-law, phase, video, etc.). In this section we will discuss

some of the more important considerations that influence the choice and

treatment of detectors

5.10.1. Built-in Detectors

The detector that is built into the transducer under test, may or may not

be used in the measurement, depending upon the following factors:

(1) If it is an envelope detector (linear rectifier, video detector), it

can be used without calibration in the 3-dB Gain Control, Tangential, and

Comparison Techniques , and in the Attenuator Method of the Y-Factor Technique

If the envelope detector is calibrated so that its output signal voltage is

known as a function of its input noise power, it can also be used in the Power

Meter Method of the Y-Factor Technique. This calibration is not ordinarily

known, however. An envelope detector cannot be used in the CW Technique to

83
yield good accuracy because its response depends upon the particular mixture of

noise and CW powers present [49]

(2) If it is a square-law detector (power detector, quadratic detector), it

can be used in any of the techniques described except the Automatic Y-Factor

Technique, which uses its own external detector.

(3) If it is a phase detector (multiplier, product detector), it behaves

simply as a frequency translator and the transducer is equivalent to one having

no detector (see below)

When the built-in detector is used in the measurement, the measurement

technique is chosen as indicated in (1) or (2) above. The instrumentation

required to follow the detector is chosen according to the needs for additional

gain and filtering as required by the selected output indicator.

When the built-in detector is not used in the measurement, proceed as discussed below under External Detectors. The principal problem in this case

is usually that of tapping into the receiver ahead of the detector to extract

the signal without introducing changes in the system that cause the measurement

results to be inaccurate.

5.10.2. External Detectors

When the transducer under test has no built-in detector, the detector

network of the measurement system is chosen according to the desired measurement

technique and/or the instrumentation at hand.

The Y-Factor/Power Meter Method and the CW Technique require a power

measuring device. A square-law, power or quadratic detector works well for both

techniques, and a commercial power meter can be used for convenience. A

calibrated linear detector (calibrated in terms of noise power) , can also be

used in the Y-Factor method but not in the CW Technique, for reasons given above.

All other techniques described in this Guide except the Automatic Technique

can use either a linear or a power-type external detector in the measurement

system. The reason for this is that in those techniques the detector and

post-detector networks serve only to indicate one or more reference levels of

power. These levels need not be known. And, since these levels remain constant

for a given measurement of F or T , the law of the detector is unimportant as

e long as it is stable during the measurement.

84
The Automatic Technique utilizes a detector that is internal to the noise

factor indicator system. This detector is usually a square- law device, which

simplifies the meter scale calibration on the indicator.

5.11. Cooled Networks

When a noise source and a transducer under test are at different thermodynamic temperatures, the heat flow between them can give rise to measurement

errors. An illustration of this condition is the case of a cooled parametric

amplifier to which is connected a hot thermal noise generator for making a Y-Factor measurement. Alternatively, one might have a very warm tube- type

receiver to which is connected a cryogenically cooled thermal noise generator.

In each case, heat flow could change the noise temperatures of either device,

depending upon the heat capacities and/or temperature regulation that might

prevail.

For precision measurements, some form of thermal isolation should be used

between source and transducer. For example, a length of stainless steel

waveguide with a thin plating of silver on its inner surfaces will provide

good electrical conductivity and poor thermal conductivity. With careful

design, the thermal gradients and electrical losses can be determined so

as to provide information for computation of corrections for the effects

of heat transfer. Without such precautions, the noise temperature of a thermal

noise generator cooled with a liquid cryogen might be raised to several

degrees above the cryogen temperature, thus producing a significant error

when measuring small values of T^.

5.12. Multiport Transducers

The noise factor of a multiport transducer is undefined. The T^ of a transducer having one output port and more than one input port can be measured

by the Y-Factor technique in the following way (basic procedure)

1. Arrange the equipment as shown in figure 21.

2. Connect Hot Noise Generators to the transducer input ports.

3. Record the reading of the Power Meter, P, .

85
LU UJ 3 I— O UJ

1—

ID • a. • UJ 1—1 o 1—

rD 3: CM o

oo ^/^ z. I— <t 1—4 cc: a: > o

I— Q- oo1—

o

UJ I—

1—1 cc C\J o UJ 1—

UJ

CD

(Uo

XJ

toc

03

s-

+->s-o

a.

•I— +J

s-o

-oo

SI

+-> cu

+->o

D_

s-o

+-> a

O)

s86
4. Disconnect the Hot Noise Generators and connect Cold Noise Generators to

the transducer input ports

5. Record the reading of the Power Meter, P^.

6 . Calculate the Y-Factor from the equation

P

Y = . (68) c

7 . Calculate from the equation

T =

e Y-1

00 _O0 00

T / T, , G, df +/ T, „ G„ df +. . .+ / T, G df

1 o hi 1 o h2 2 o hn n olG, df + / G„ df +. . . + / G df

J o 2 Jon

/CO ^OO /•CO T , G, df +/ T - G^ df +...+ / T G df

o ^cl 1 y o c2 2 ^ o cn n Y-1

/OO ^00 y» oo Ol_ G, df + / G„ df +. . .+ / G

J o 2 Jon df

(69)

where the subscript "n" refers to the nth port.

8. If noise sources are chosen such that

^^hl = ^h2 = ••• = ^hn = ^h (70)

and

T„icl = T^o = ... = T = T (71) c2 cn c

\

' •I

at all frequencies, equation (69) becomes

T, - YT

m— _ n c

e - — • (72) Y-1

It is evident from the above brief procedure outline that the measurement

of for this particular example would be difficult and probably unsatisfactory.

However, it illustrates the nature of the problem. There are other possible

multi-port configurations which pose even more difficult challenges. These

multi-port situations are rare, and a discussion of them is not considered to

be within the scope of this guide.

87
6. WORKING EQUATIONS

The derivations in this section are based on idealized models of the ten

measurement methods in order that the reader can clearly and quickly see what i

basically taking place in each technique. Actual measurement set-uos using

these methods will introduce additional factors that complicate their analysis.

Many of these factors have been discussed in Section 5, Practical Measurement

Problems . A thorough rigorous analysis of these real-world situations is

beyond the scope of this guide.

A summary of working equations for these techniques is given in Table III.

6.1. Y-Factor Technique (Idealized Conditions)

6.1.1. Power Meter Method

The three parts of the measurement system are the following (see figure 22

a. Transducer under test

b. Random noise generator

c. Power Meter

The transducer has two ports, an in-port and an out-port, and is linear.

It has a gain G that is constant from frequency f to ±2 and is zero outside

of this interval. It has a T^ that is constant in the interval (f-j^f ^2^'

The random noise generator provides two levels of available noise power

per unit bandwidth, viz., kT^ and kT^ where

T, > T . (73 h c

Both and T^ are constant from frequency f^^ to The generator source

impedance is the value for which the transducer has an average effective

input noise temperature T^

The power meter is noise-free, linear, and sensitive enough to measure

the noise power levels available from the transducer out-port. Its sensitivity

is constant over the frequency interval i^^.' ^2^ ' reflection of power

occurs at its in-port.

The measurement system is assumed to be perfectly shielded against all

extraneous interference.

88
Ifl o

>1 mo

uico

•H

4J -HC

•H

MH

0) aMOmc

(U

+J

(0

>i

0)(U w

in

m

n

rH rH

CO

B

(0

B rH B 8 1 CM CM

B 1< rH < 1 

8

IrH rH CN rH 73 8

rH -eH

nS 1 CN

B « <C

o 0 -e- CNI rH 1 B B rH

fn « < B

rH rH 1 C -a IB 1 1 rH B 1 M

C

H

H

B

J3 (N B (0 CM 3 B

u CN

II II II 1 II II II 1 0) 1 0) 1 (U 1 0 1 0) 1 01 1 <D IB IB IB IB IB IB IB

U3 r~ Lf)

oo u\O rH (N 00 CO (Tl rH rH H

rH

rH rH

+

++ <u 0 B B

(0 0 B B b"' B°

rH

rH

+ rH 8 < CN B^ 0 < +

rH rH

B rH "Th 1 rH 8 + + 1 rH CN rH e- H S

Ol 0 < Cr> r^i Ol 0 B 1 « B IB -e- < - 0 rH tN (0 1 B B B° CNI rH B

>^ rH

H

rH rH

C 1 cn 1 Iji rH 1 0 1 1 1 1 -a 0 B 0 B X >l H B (N B° H B C

xi\ 0 J5l 0 EH

B

E-> IB

B Ib

U 8 U (N

II II II II II II II \h Ih Ih lb. Ih lb.

-a0 0 p

D 0)

p 0 0 s 0) Sh in a 3 <U 3 0) 0 O 0 u u w u U3 M

-p 0 3 3 r-t rJ 0) 4J (U 0 rH (1) 0

CJ* (0 rHw 0 H CO 3 ja H XI

V-<

a

O 4-1 (fl T) •H <u •H C -H <D 0 s p M X +1 0 M X

vu -M 0 -p nj •H O Pn < > >

(0 § G

03

PH 1 «

>4 Ifl < XI

<N 'J
CD

73

0)aCOo

pa

EH

lOl

O

Eh IEh

Eh

II

EHI 3\mm

(dO

Eh Ieh

EH

II

IfcH

+1C

(8 Eh 10

Oo

iHX

tnl pa <N I

-II

IHO

-Pu

(U

4-) <D QU

(0

<UC

•H

1^

CU CQ I

•IIuopo

(U +)

<u Qs

ro rHI0)^

10Cw

in

CM

CM

in

CM

CMe

•II I ^co

tn H

(0aeou

<u

to

u

<u <U <D

u

15

H

U 0 0 3 e

O) • CM • Cn 0 0 0 •H u

tl 3 IH MH 3 3 a c CM C 0 Jh P o P 0 01 0) 3 -rH 3-H rH o +J 0 -P O

•H -Hc CM

M -OH -0

C

(ua (U

c

o rH 0)

U

o

o

O 0 lO rH 0 3 0 3 O -P •P -d t) (0 3

to -P 01 -P

e SH rH

C 3 G 3 0 (U rH (1) (0 Q) lO CM p -p (0 C

^4

a 3 <D EH -H Eh-H < e H 01 CM CM CM 1 \

ij

>H Q4' 1 1 ^ } u

r-l

i-J 4-*1 M

CD ^

-H p-* rrtU

•rl (J rHvJ W •H 03

>>

P 5 D 0 a 0) 0

l-tj 'ri (0 HJ +• 3 3 Id u a -P o n (U (U M 01 3

01 +> 0)a

a

rH 01

S rd -P 0 (d 0 H 3 2 s a EH 0 0 1 1 1

CO

e

X

CM CM 0 >i

rH

m -P 3 CJ rl 0 01 1 > 0 dJ 0 -r) rH P

at 0)

X 4->

i*

rH r( 1 00 g 0 0 01 ro 01 rH e C 3 X G rH (d 0

<N •r) 0 SH 01 0 p

VO

PG 0 -P MH

c

HPG

u 0

rH 0)U (0 0 M (U (d -P 4J Hi U 0 MH 01 (0 u 3 G G 3 3

Cn 0 (d

G 0 G 4J

)H 4J 0 0 (U (d <d C 01 H G 4J u 0 P 01 H +J (U 0 M 01 0 - > (d

01 (UG

H

c 01

G <U 0) 0 H (d ^ rH •p M e 0) 0 e \ 4J 0) 0 0 N d) <u 0 4-) rH •rH 01 (U Q 3 Q rH 3 M H

rH 1^ 0 0 0 (d 0 w Eh w Eh ffl -n > 3 U H « -e- ^ 8 Eh

0)

•p rH 3

•P 0 0 •P 3 si 0 lO CM U

u

G UH MH (U 0 -H 0 0 <D -p U 0 <u 0) <u 0) 3

10 g!

M •p 4J

m •H 3 3 U 3 U Id

M

•P 4J -P 0 4-) 0 <u 0 >,

<u 0 Id (d •P (0 4J ID (U •P •P

01 <U

U

M <d Sh 10

H 10 •rl ri MH 0) (U M 0) M 0 3 > 0 <4H CM CM <D CM <U G G •H G (U e e G e G p 0) 4J

01 3) <U 0) •a IH 4J 4J rH (U (1) +1 •P Cn 4J CJi u 0 4J +J •H 0 0< (0 4J G Id g

(d Ifl (U 0) 0) 0). (!)

U (U 01 i u U 01 0) 01 to 01 a Id •H CQ G

0) •H

H •H •rl •rl (0 0 -a Id

w 0 0 0 0 0 •P CTl 1 u c 3 G 2 G W CM n 4J 0

+J 1 1 1 1 1 >1 I 1

Id <D (a 0 0

1^ 1^ EH EH EH

90
Ct: UJ UJ

1— O UJ a.

ai 1—

III f O UJ

ZD I— Q

oo q: li- ^ UJ

1— 13

q:o

UJ 1— O

00 =a: h1—1 q; O UJ n-E

UJ hC3

t3O

(U

<u

sO)

o

a.

s-o

4-> O

CM

CVJ

<U

S-=5

91
The generator, transducer and meter are connected together as shown in

figure 22. When the generator noise temperature is T^, the power meter

reading is Pj^, where

P, = k(T, + T~)BG (74) h h e

and

B = £2 - fj^. (75)

When the generator noise temperature is T^, the power meter reading

is P^, where

P^ = k(T^ + Tg)BG. (76)

The Y-Factor is

P

P

From (74 ) , (76 ) , and (77) ,

Y = — . (77) c

T + T

Y = — -| . (78)

T + T

c e

Solving (78) for T^ gives

T, - YT

T = — — . (79)

® Y -1

From (6) and (79)

— 290 290

F = — + 1. (80)

Y - 1

9.2
6.1.2. Attenuator Method

The four parts of the measurement system are the following (see figure 23)

a. Transducer under test

b. Random noise generator

c. Variable attenuator

d. Signal level indicator

The transducer has two ports, an in-port and an out-port, and is linear.

It has a gain G that is constant from frequency f^ to £2 and is zero outside

of this interval. It has a T^ that is constant in the interval (^^r ^2^'

The random noise generator provides two levels of available noise power

per unit bandwidth, viz., kT, and kT where

Both T^ and T^ are constant from frequency f^ to f^- The generator source

impedance is the value for which the transducer has an average effective input

noise temperature T^.

The variable attenuator is a precision unit with enough range to meet

the measurement requirements stated below. Its attenuation at a given setting

is constant over the frequency interval (f^^, £2)' Its terminal impedances

match those of the transducer output impedance and signal level indicator

input impedance, respectively.

The signal level indicator is noise-free, stable, and sensitive enough

to provide a precise indication of the signal level applied to it. It responds

equally to all frequencies in the interval i^-^i ^2^'

The measurement system is assumed to be perfectly shielded against all

extraneous interference.

The generator, transducer, attenuator, and indicator are connected together

as shown in figure 23. When the generator noise temperature is T^ and the

attenuator transmittance is a^, the indicator reading is I , where

> T

c

(81)

I = k(T + T )BG a

c ^ c e' c

(82)

93
_J o

<: —I H- ^ UJ <c o > o I—1 LU I—

—1 Q

Q

UJ O

_l 1—

CO ea: <:

J <C 1—

> 1—

<:

i

cc: 1—

UJ 00 O UJ

ho cu Z LU

< o

q; ^

-oo

CU

o

-»->

0) +J

4->

o

4->O

fO

Ll_

I >-

CO

CM

CU

%-

cn

o

UJ h-

^

CyO <=C I—

1—1 Ql O UJ •>

UJ I—

CD

94
and

B = £2 - t^. (75)

When the generator noise temperature is T^, the attenuator transmittance is

changed to ot^, where

< a^, (83)

to produce the same indicator reading I^. Then

^c " '^e^^^ "h- (^4)

The Y-Factor is

a Y = — . (85)

from (82), (84), and (85),

T, + T

Y = . (78)

T + T

c e

Solving (7 8) for T^ gives

T - YT

T = ^ . (79)

Y -1

From (6) and (79) ,

T, T h

_Y c F = 290 29^ (80)

Y -1

95
6.2. 3-dB Technique (Idealized Conditions)

6.2.1. Variable Source Method

The four parts of the measurement system are the following (see figure 24):

a. Transducer under test

b. Temperature- limited diode (TLD) noise generator

c. 3-dB fixed attenuator

d. Signal level indicator

The transducer has two ports, an in-port and an out-port, and is linear.

It has a gain G that is constant from frequency f^ to ±2 and is zero outside

of this interval. It has an F that is constant in the interval (fj^/ ^2^'

The TLD noise generator has a continuously adjustable available noise

power with a range sufficient for the measurement. The available noise power

at any given setting is constant from frequency f^ to The meter scale

of the generator is calibrated directly in F (dB) . The generator source impedance

is the value, R, for which the transducer has an average effective input

noise temperature T^. The temperature of the source impedance is 290K.

The fixed attenuator is a precision unit with a transmittance , A, of 0.5

(3dB) . Its attenuation is constant over the frequency interval (f^^f ^2^'

Its terminal impedances match those of the transducer output impedance and

signal level indicator impedance, respectively.

The signal level indicator is noise-free, stable, and sensitive enough

to provide a precise indication of the signal level applied to it. It responds

equally to all frequencies in the interval (f-j^/ ^2^' input impedance

matches the output impedance of the transducer.

The measurement system is assumed to be perfectly shielded against all

extraneous interference.

The generator, transducer, attenuator, and indicator are connected together

as shown in figure 24. When the TLD emission current is zero and the transducer

is connected directly to the indicator, the indicator reading is I, where

I = kT F BG, (86)

96
on

—1 o

<i: -J I— ^ llj <: o > o t—I UJ I—

I

OO _J Q

OC I—

LU C/) O LU

ZD I— Q

Z LU

-oo

(U

cuo

S-o

<u

•r—&-

00

I CO

CVJ

sLU 0

1 Q I—

UJ 0 <c

DC 1—

1

q:

ZD Q LU

1—

eC Q UJ ER TE

Q_ 1—

1

LU

2:

UJ

s:

I—

1

H- _i NO

97
T = 290 K, o

(87)

and

B = f2 - (75)

When the attenuator is inserted between the transducer and the indicator,

the emission current is increased to the value I^, in amperes, that produces

the same indicator reading I. Then

I = A k (T F + — I, R (1))BG (88) ° 2k °

where A = transmittance of the 3-dB attenuator, 0.5

— 2 3 k = Boltzmann's constant, 1.381x10 joule per kelvin

— 19

e = electron charge, 1.602x10 coulomb

R = source resistance of noise generator, in ohms

and (J) = frequency correction factor (see Section 5.3.).

Solving (86) and (88) for F gives

_ e I R * A

F = . (89)

2 k T (1-A) o Substituting into (89) the values for A, e, k, and gives

F = 20 I, R. (90) a

For R = 50 ohms, F becomes

F = 1000 I,. (91) d

As stated above, the generator's milliammeter, which measures I^, is

calibrated directly in units of F(dB) so that the measurement result is

read directly without need of any computation for a 50-ohm source impedance.

When the source impedance R has a temperature that is different from

= 290K, F is given by

98
_ e 1, R 4> A T

F = ^ + 1, (92)

2 k T (l-A) T o o

instead of by (89) . From (5) and (9 2)

e I , R ()) A

T = T (93)

® 2 k(l-A) ^

6.2.2. Fixed Source Method

The five parts of the measurement system are the following (see figure 25)

a. Transducer under test

b. Random noise generator

c. Variable attenuator

d. 3-dB fixed attenuator

e. Signal level indicator

The transducer, 3-dB fixed attenuator and signal level indicator are as described in Section 6.2.1.

The random noise generator provides two levels of available noise power per

unit bandwidth, viz., kT^ when it is turned OFF, and kT^ when it is turned

ON. T anand T are constant from frequency f^ to f„. The generator source

J. z impedance is also constant in the interval (fj^/ '

The variable attenuator is a precision unit with enough range to meet

the measurement requirements stated below. Its attenuation at a given setting

is constant over the frequency interval (fj^/ • ^^^ input impedance matches

the output impedance of the noise generator. Its output impedance is the

value for which the transducer has an average effective input noise temperature

T . The thermodynamic temperature of the attenuator is T . 6 3.

The measurement system is assumed to be perfectly shielded against all

extraneous interference

The generator, variable attenuator, transducer, fixed attenuator, and

indicator are connected together as shown in figure 25. When the generator

99
I—

O

I—<

ai (—

LU to O LlJ ZD 1—

Q

2: LlJ < Q

q: ^

l

q:

LU 0

_i I—

OQ <

< ZD

1—1 ;z 3

q; lLl > h-<:

i

T5

O

4->

o

S-o

-aX

OQ

T3

CO

LO

CVJ

<U

O

UJ h- c

oo ca; I—

I—I q; O UJ »>

LU I—

100
is turned OFF and the transducer is connected directly to the indicator,

the indicator reading is I, where

I = k (T + f~) BG

a e

and

When the 3-dB fixed attenuator is inserted between the transducer and

the indicator, the generator is turned ON and and the variable attenuator

is adjusted to a transmittance of a that produces the same indicator reading,

Then, using (35)

= Ak T a + T (l-a)+T n a e BG,

where A is the transmittance of the 3-dB attenuator.

Solving (9 4) and (9 5) for gives

If A = 0.5, T becomes

e

T = a(T - T ) — T . a

T

e =(Tn

- T)a-T. a a

If T = 29 OK, F is given by

Si

F = al

^ - 1

I ^

29 0 / 1-A

If T is different from T = 290K, F is given by

o. O

' T - T \ , T

F = al ^ ) ^ ^ + 1

^o / ^o

instead of by (98)

101
6.3. Automatic Technique (Idealized Conditions)

The three parts of the measurement system are the following (see figure 26):

a. Transducer under test

b. Switched noise generator

c. Automatic noise figure meter (ANFM)

The transducer has two ports, an in-port and an out-port, and is linear.

It has a gain G that is constant from frequency f^ to and is zero outside

of this interval. It has an F that is constant in the interval (f^^f ^2^'

The noise generator is capable of being switched rapidly between two

noise power levels, kT,B and kT„B, where

and T2 are constant over the frequency interval, (f ^, • The generator

source impedance is the same at both noise power levels, and is the value

for which the transducer has an effective input noise temperature T^. Switching

between kT^B and kT^B is automatically controlled by a signal from the ANFM.

The ANFM is a signal processing/display instriament that provides sufficient

gain and low noise to properly process its input signals. Its circuits are

designed to electronically compute and display F by one of the several

methods described below. The measurement range of the instrument is adequate

for the measurement.

The measurement system is assumed to be perfectly shielded against all

extraneous interference

The generator, transducer, and ANFM are connected together as shown in

figure 26. When the noise generator is switched to the kT^^B level, the output

power, P, , from the transducer is given by

k T, B < k T_ B. (100)

P, = k (T, + T ) BG.

1 1 e

(101)

When the generator is switched to the kT B level, the output power is

P2 = k (T2 + T^) BG. (102)

102
LxJ o al

1—1 rD 1— e> cc: <C ' UJ ^ Li_ 1

o UJ

\— u

ID tn

-1 • O T3

O^4-> 0)

UJ <c

1—

cm \— 1 UJ o O UJ •r" ID 1— 4-> Q 03 oo or: lu. HI E Z UJ *^—

O

<C Q r~ -M

1—

\— rD IS. 00

i

«

CM

O)

io>

•1—

1

Q cm

UJ o

a: UJ 1— OJ

<_> oo < 1—

1— i-< ai

l-H o 1 1 1 •> —

3: z Z r—

00 UJ 1—

o

103
Let the gain of the ANFM be g, so that the power detected in the ANFM is

gP^ and gP2 , respectively, for the two conditions given above. Further, let the

automatic gain control (AGC) system in the ANFM operate so as to hold gain

g at a constant value that will produce a full scale deflection on the ANFM

display meter when the noise source is generating kT^B. From (101) and (102),

gP^ = g k (T^ + f^) BG (103)

and

gP2 = g k (T2 + T^) BG. (104)

Solving (103) and (104) for T gives

e

/gP,

'^2 - ^1 ('

T = ^ . (1051

gP.

-2 - 1

gP,

Using (6) , F is given by

290 290 gP,

F = + 1. (106)

gP

- 1

Note that the ratio gF^/gP^ is the Y-Factor.

The Quantity gP2 is fixed by circuit design as stated above. The display

meter circuit is designed to deflect as a function of gP^^. Therefore, since

all the factors on the right-hand side of (106) are constant except gP-^,

the meter scale can be printed to indicate F or F(dB) directly.

In the above description, the automatic gain control operates so as

to maintain a constant value of gP2 • Note that it is also possible to design

an ANFM in which the value of gP^^ is held constant, or in which the average

of gP^ and gP2 (i.e., g(P^ + ^2^/2) is held constant. Such variations as these are the basis for different designs used in commercial ANFM's.

104
6.4. Gain Control Technique (Idealized Conditions)

g^4 Variable Source Method

The three parts of the measurement system are the following (see figure 27):

a. Transducer under test

b. Temperature-limited diode (TLD) noise generator

c. Signal level indicator

The transducer has two ports, an in-port and an out-port, and is linear.

It has a gain G that is adjustable over a range sufficient to meet the measureiment requirements stated below. At any given setting, G is constant within

the frequency interval (f^' ^2^' ^"'^ zero outside of this interval. The

value of F is constant in the interval i^-^' ^2^' independent of the

gain settings required in the measurement.

The TLD noise generator has a continuously adjustable available noise

power with a range sufficient for the measurement. The available noise power

at any given setting is constant from frequency f^^ to f^- The meter scale

of the generator displays the TLD emission current, I^. The generator source

impedance is the value, R, for which the transducer has an average effective

input noise temperature f^. The temperature of the source impedance is 29 OK.

The signal level indicator is noise-free, stable, and sensitive enough

to provide a precise indication of the signal level applied to it. It responds

equally to all frequencies in the interval (f^, f^) • Its input impedance

matches the output impedance of the transducer

The measurement system is assumed to be perfectly shielded against all

extraneous interference.

The generator, transducer, and indicator are connected together as shown

in figure 27. When the TLD emission current is zero and the transducer

gain is maximum , G, , the indicator reading is I, , where

I^ = k (T^ + T^) BG^, (107)

T = 290 K, (87)

105
cx: _l o

>=C -1 1—

;z ll.1 <C

o >• o 1—1 LlJ 1—

CO _1 o

1—

t

ai 1—

CNJ O UJ

=D 1—

Q 1—1 ^ LU Ci3 < Q

1— =)

i

Lu o

1 Q I—

LU O <

q; >--1 ck: ZD Q UJ

c£ Q UJ

q: l UJ HQ- 1—1 UJ

2: s: on

1 1 1

1—1

1—

1— —1 o

-ao

j=

4->

a

3

O

•r—

03

O

%-

O

C_)

n3

CJ3

O)

sCD

106
and

B = f2 - f^. (75)

When the TLD emission current is adjusted to a value I^-j^f the new indicator

reading is l^t where

I2 = + "^e^ + ^ ^ ^dl ^ *] ^1 ^ ^1°^)

and

I2 > • (109)

Now, reducing G to a value to again produce the former indicator reading

1^ gives

^1 = (Tq + T^) + k e 1^3^ R (() j + ^ e I^T R (()

I G, B (110)

where

^2 < (111)

Finally, increasing the TLD emission current to a value 1^^ that again

produces the larger indicator reading I2 gives

^2 = ['^ (^o ^e^ ^ ^d2 ^ *J ^2 <112)

Solving (107), (108), (110), and (112) for gives

Tg = T . (113)

2 k (1^2 - 2 Idi)

Using (6), F is given by

e (I,,)* R * F = ^

(114)

2 "^o (^d2 - 2 Idl>

10 7
or,

20 (I,,)^ R <f) F = ^ . (115)

^d2 - 2 Idl

When the source impedance R has a temperature T that is different from

3. = 290K, and F are given by

T = ^T (116)

2 k (1^2 - 2 Idl^

and

e (1)2 R <}. T

F = — ^ + 1, (117) 2kT (I,_-2I,J T

o d2 dl o

instead of by (113) and (114)

6.4.2. Fixed Source Method

The four parts of the measurement system are the following (see figure 28)

a. Transducer under test

b. Random noise generator

c . Variable attenuator

d. Signal level indicator

The noise generator and variable attenuator have the characteristics

described in 6.2.2., and the transducer and signal level indicator have the

characteristics described in 6.4.1. When the generator noise temperature

is T , the power meter reading is p , , where °- ol

PqI = k (T^ + Tg) B. (118)

108
_l 0

cC _J hz uJ <:

CJ3 > O

I—1 UJ HH

C/) _l Q

1 1

i

0

•t—

n 1 SI

CH 1— CM

UJ CO C3 O LU

rD H- ffi 1—

CJ3 Z UJ CO

<C Q

CD (— 13 II- d)

X

• r" U.

i

4J

C

0

q:

LU o

_l 1— CM CD

CO cc a

cC ZD ' 1—1 z " CO

a: LU 1—1 C\J <C 1-- 3

> 1—

c3

C7>

•p—

i

o

UJ 1—

oo <: c

O LlJ

UJ

CD

109
As in 6.4.1., we can continue by writing

^02

Pol =

= k Inla T a + T (1-a, ) + T G, B (119)

l ejl

and

^02 = ^

where

[^n ^2 ^ "^a^^-V ^ \ ] S (121)

and

G2 < . (Ill)

Solving (118), (119), (120), and (121) for gives

T = (T - T ) ± T . (123) e n a ^ a

«2 " ^a^^

If T = 290K, F is given by

F = (t^ - 1 . (124)

\ o / - 2a^

If is different from = 290K, F is given by

(TT„ - T_ \ ( Oj^) ^ T. F=(^^ ^1 - — + 1, (125)

0^ - 2

instead of by (124)

110
6.5. CW Technique (Idealized Conditions)

The three parts of the measurement system are the following (see figure 29):

a. Transducer under test

b. CW signal generator

c . Power meter

The transducer has two ports, an in-port and an out-port, and is linear.

It has a gain G that is constant from frequency f^ to f.^ and is zero outside

of this interval. It has an F that is constant in the interval (f^, f 2) •

The CW generator has both adjustable frequency and adjustable output power

level, the ranges of which are adequate for the measurement requirements

stated below. The CW signal is a pure sinusoid with no modulation or spurious

components . The generator source impedance is the value for which the transducer

has an average effective input noise temperature of T^. The thermodynamic

temperature of the source impedance is T . a

The power meter is noise free, linear, and sensitive enough to measure

the noise power levels available from the transducer out-port. Its sensitivity

is constant over the frequency interval (f ' ^° reflection of power

occurs at its in-port.

The measurement system is assumed to be perfectly shielded against all

extraneous interference.

The generator, transducer, and power meter are connected together as shown

in figure 29. When the CW signal level is zero, the power meter reading

is P^, where

= k (T^ + f^) GB, (126)

and

B = f2 - f^. (75)

When the available CW power from the generator is set to P^ , and its frequency

is set to the measurement frequency, f^, the power meter reading is P2,

where

P2 = k (T^ + f^) GB + Pg G. (127)

111
O LU

cl. s:

CC I—

Lul 00

C_3 UJ

1—

Q

to q; Z LU

or 2:

1— ZD

(U

oo

CM

(U

s01

o

so; 10

C_) UJ

112
Solving (126) and (127) for gives

T- = - T . (128) e , „/Po \ a

Using (6), F is given by

p

F = 1 + 1. (129) T

o

If T = T = 290K, F is given by

Si o

p

4x10-2

F = ^T^=^ r- • (130)

6.6. Tangential Technique (Idealized Conditions)

The four parts of the measuring system are the following (see figure 30)

a. Transducer under test

b. Pulsed CW generator

c. Linear detector or square-law detector

d. Oscilloscope

The transducer has two ports, an in-port and an out-port, and is linear.

It has a gain G that is constant from frequency f to ±2 and is zero outside

of this interval. It has an F that is constant in the interval (fj^/ •^2^"

The CW generator has both adjustable frequency and adjustable output

power level, the ranges of which are adequate for the measurement requirements

stated below. The CW signal is 100% modulated with a square wave voltage.

No other modulation or spurious components exist on the signal. The generator

source impedance is the value for which the transducer has an average effective

input noise temperature T . The temperature of the source impedance is 290K.
PE

o

o

CO

o

_l

_l

1—

o

ooc

; L

_i

< o —

1— (T\J

q: o

LjJ LU

I— 1— C~ X LU U

LU O

hI (0

• 1"c

(U

c

fC

• oc t—

UJ oo y 9 O LU

13 1— Q

OO CC

2: LU 1 IS < Q

LL. 1— r3

i

_i

<

o o HH 1—

</> Q LU QLU Z

OO LU

—1 Ci3 r)

Q_

114
The linear detector follows the law

= a for -v^ > o (131)

= o for < o (132)

where v^^ and are the input and output voltages, respectively, and

a is a characteristic parameter of the detector. The value of a is constant

over the frequency interval (f^, f2)'

The square-law detector follows the law

v^ = b V? (133)

where b is a characteristic parameter of the detector. The value of b is

constant over the frequency interval (f f^) .

The oscilloscope is noise-free, stable, and sensitive enough to provide

a clear display of the signal levels applied to it. It responds equally to

all frequencies in the output voltages from both detectors

The measurement system is assumed to be perfectly shielded against all

extraneous interference.

The generator, transducer, detector, and oscilloscope are connected together

as shown in figure 30. When the CW signal level is zero, the power delivered to

the detector is P^^, where

Pj^ = k (T^ + f^) GB (134)

and

B = f2 - f^. (75)

When the available CW power from the modulated signal generator is set to

Pg during the ON period of modulation, and the CW frequency is set to

the measurement frequency, f^, the power delivered to the detector is P^, where

P- = k (T + T~) GB + P G. (135)

^ O 6 S

is entirely noise power. P^ is a mixture of noise power, k(T^ + T^)GB,

and CW power, P^G. The output signal-to-noise power ratio, (S/N)^, when the

CW generator is ON, is

115
(S/N)^ = (136)

k (T + T ) B ^ o e'

and the input signal-to-noise power ratio, (S/N) . , is

(S/N)^ =

T B

o

(137)

From one definition of F, Section 2.1., and using (137),

(S/N). P

F = = 2 . (138)

(S/N)^ ^ <2/N)o

When the generator source impedance has a temperature, T , that is different

from = 290K, F is given by

+ 1.

k T B (S/N) o ^ ' 'o

(139)

(S/N)^ is determined empirically for a "tangential pattern" display on the

oscilloscope. The "tangential pattern" occurs when is set to a value that

causes the upper segment of the oscilloscope trace to be just completely above

the lower segment of the trace. The value of P^ that produces the tangential

pattern is not specific because the determination of when the tangential pattern

is obtained is a subjective determination. However, experiments indicate that

(S/N) is within ±1 dB of 11 dB for most "linear" detectors, and within +i of

o

8 dB for most "square-law" detectors.

Using these values of (S/N) , F is given very approximately by

2P

B

and

F = —- X 10^' for linear detectors (140)

4P

B

F = —— X 10^^ for square-law detectors. (141)

116
From (5) and (139)

P

s T - T (142) e a k B (S/N)^

6.7. Comparison Technique (Idealized Conditions)

The four parts of the measurement system are the following (see figure 31)

a. Transducer under test

b. Master transducer

c . CW signal generator

d. Power meter

The transducer under test has two ports, an in-port and an out-port, and

is linear. It has a gain that is constant from frequency f^^ to f^' ^^'^ is

zero outside this interval. It has an F = that is constant in the interval

(f , , f„) , and which obtains when its in-port is terminated by an impedance

The master transducer is the same as the transducer under test except that

it has a gain G and F = F . m m

The CW generator has both adjustable frequency and adjustable output power

level, the ranges of which are adequate for the measurement requirements stated

below. The CW signal is a pure sinusoid with no modulation or spurious components.

The generator source impedance, , is the value for which the transducers

have average effective input noise temperatures of T^^ and T^^. The thermodynamic temperature of the source impedance is T . 3.

The power meter is noise-free, linear, and sensitive enough to measure the

noise power levels available from the transducer out-port. Its sensitivity is

constant over the frequency interval (f^, f^) . No. reflection of power occurs

at its in-port.

The measurement system is assumed to be perfectly shielded against all

extraneous interference.

Z s

117
q; I—

LU 00

C_3 LlJ ZD 1—

O

00 OH ^ UJ

=a: Q

q; ^

1— ZD

o

c

o

CO

'P-sa.E

o

o

CO

<u

szscn

118
The generator, transducers, and power meter are connected together as shown

in figure 31. When the generator is connected to the master transducer and

the CW signal level is zero, the power meter reading is Pjj,j^/ where

ml

= k

a em

B G

m

(143)

and

B = f2 - f^. (75)

When the available CW power from the generator is set to , and its frequency

is set to the measurement frequency, f^, the power meter reading is Pj^2 ' where

P- = k(T + T )BG„ + P G. m2 a em m s m

(144)

When the generator is connected to the transducer under test and the CW

signal level is zero, the power meter reading is P , , where

P,=k(T + T )BG. xl ^ a ex X

(145)

Similarly for a CW power level of P^,

P ^ = k {T + T )BG + P G. x2 a ex x s x

(146)

Solving (143) and (144) for T gives em ^

T

em / P o bI - 1

-ml

- ^a' (147)

so that, from (6)

F~ = m

k T B/ - 1 o

+ 1.

T

"ml

(148)

If = = 290K, is given by

119
F = m

, „ _ , in2 , , k T B/ 1' o ml

Similarly, from (145) and (146),

(149)

s

k B/ — - 1

- ^a' (150)

so that, from (6 )

xl

F = X

+ 1,

k T B

o x2

xl

- 1

and, if = = 290K, F^^ is given by

F = x

x2 k T B/ - 1 o xl

From (149) and (152), F^ is given in terms of F^^ by the equation

(151)

(152)

F = F X m

(P - - P T

) P T m2 ml xl

(P _ - P , ) P , x2 xl ml

(153)

If P^2 Pjni ^^'^ ' approximately x2 xl' x

F = F X m

P P m2 xl

P P ml x2

(154)

From (147) and (150), T is given in terms of T by the equation 6^ Sin

120
ex

= T

em

P P T s xl

P . - P , x2 xl

k T B

a

P P , s ml

P - P m2 ml

(155)

k T B

a

If P _ >> P , , P ~ >> P 1

, and if P P , and P P , are much greater x2 xl' m2 ml s xl s ml ^ than

k T B, T is approximately

a ex

P P m2 xl ^ —^

(156) ex em ^

' ml ''x2

121
7. MEASUREMENT ERRORS

The uncertainty in the measured value of F or T^ is found by considering

all of the significant sources of uncertainty and combining their individual

contributions by means of an error equation. In this section we will discuss

the error equation for each of the measurement techniques, and also we will

briefly discuss the various sources of measurement uncertainty. General

comments on the treatment of errors are found in Appendix B.

The basic error equations are derived from the working equations given

in Section 6. The first-order (linear) error equation usually provides sufficient

accuracy for most measurement requirements. Worked examples that illustrate

the use of the working and error equations are found in Section 8.

7.1. Y-Factor Technique

7.1.1. Power Meter Method

The working equation for the Y-Factor/power meter method is the following:

T - YT

T = — . (79) ^ Y-1

The uncertainty, 5T^, in T^ comes from uncertainties in T^^, T^, and Y.

The uncertainty in Y comes from the uncertainty in measuring P^^ and P^. The

first-order approximation of 6T^ is

9T 9T 9T

6t = 6T, —- + 6T —- + 6Y —- , (157)

9T, ^ 9T 9Y h c

where 6T, , 6T , and 6Y are the uncertainties in the values of T, , T , and Y, h e h e respectively, and the partial derivatives are "uncertainty coefficents"

corresponding to each of these quantities (more on this below) . 6T^ is

evaluated by evaluating each uncertainty and uncertainty coefficient on the

right-hand side of (157)

Uncertainties 6Tj^ and 6T^ are obtained from the accuracy specification of

the noise generators. This may be obtained from the manufacturer, from a calibration of the generators, or by computing v the' generator noise temperature

uncertainty from its physical characteristics.

122
Uncertainty 6Y is comprised of several parts as follows:

a. Power meter inaccuracy

b. Source impedance differences

c. Non-linearity

d . Leakage

e. Spurious response

f. Gain fluctuations

g. Connector and line imperfections

The part due to the power meter inaccuracy is obtained from the manufacturer's

specifications on the meter. The remaining parts of 6Y are discussed in

Section 5 and are often very difficult to determine. With care, in some measurement situations these parts can be made less significant than the power

meter inaccuracy, in which case they are ignored in the determination of

6Y. Since Y is the ratio of two power measurements, the uncertainties in

these two measurements must be pooled properly to give 6Y (see Appendix B)

The uncertainty coefficients are obtained by differentiating (79) thus:

_ _i_ (158) " Y-1

'h

3f7

e

9T,

e ^ _ Y

8f~ Y-1

c 3f~ T, - T

e he

(159)

3Y (Y-1)

7.1.2. Attenuator Method

The working equation, error equation, and uncertainty coefficients for

the Y-factor/attenuator method are the same as for the Y-factor/power meter

method (Section 7.1.1). The only difference is that the variable attenuator

inaccuracy is used where the power meter inaccuracy was used in the previous

discussion.

(160)

123
7.2. 3-dB Technique

7.2.1. Variable Source Method

The working equation for this 3-dB method is the following:

e I , R (|) A T

F = ^ _ _a

+ 1, (92)

2k T (1-A) T

o ' o

The uncertainty, 6F, in F comes from uncertainties 61,, 6R, 6c}), 6A, and 6T

ct a in I^, R, (f)(f). A, and T^, respectively. The first-order approximation of 6F is

9F 3F 9F 3F 3F

6F = 61^ + 6R . 6* + 6A 3^ -H 6T^ . (^^^

d a

The uncertainty 61^ represents the uncertainty in the calibration of the

emission current milliammeter , whereas 6(1) represents the uncertainty in

the correction to be applied to because of the effects of the various

phenomena cited in 4.1.1.2. The uncertainty 6R is obtained from the tolerances

on the components that comprise the source impedance of the generator. 6R may

be reduced by measurement of the source impedance with accurate instruments.

6A is obtained from the manufacturer's specifications on the 3 dB attenuator.

The uncertainty 6T is obtained by estimation or by measurement.

a

Measurement uncertainties resulting from system imperfections discussed

in Section 5 are often difficult to determine. Their effect enters the working

and error equations through the factor A which then takes on an expanded

meaning to include these system parameters as well as the 3 dB attenuator

transmittance . With care, the effect of these imperfections can be made

insignificant in comparison with other uncertainties.

The uncertainty coefficients are obtained by differentiating (92) thus:

= R 4. -A (162)

91^ 2kT^ (1-A)

d o

9F e T , A (163)

3R 2kT ^ (1-A)

124
3F ^ e_

J. A (164)

9(j) 2kTQ ^ (1-A)

3F e I , R (() = d (165)

3A 2k (1-A) ^

9f_ = - ^

(166)

9T T

a o

7.2.2. Fixed Source Method

The working equation for this 3-dB method is the following:

T" = a (T - T ) - T . (96) e n a' 1-A a

The uncertainty, <5Tg» in T^ comes from uncertainties 6a, 6T^, 6T^, and 6A

in a, T , T , and A, respectively. The first-order approximation of 6T is n 3. "

3f~" aT~ 3f~ 3T~

6t7 = 6a —- + 6T —- + 6T —- + 6A —- . (167)

3a 3T ^ 3T 3A n a

Uncertainty 6T^ is obtained from the specifications of the noise generator.

6T is obtained by estimating or otherwise determining the uncertainty in the

value of T . 6a and 6A are obtained from the specifications of the variable

and the 3 dB fixed attenuators, respectively. Refer to Section 7.2.1. for a brief discussion of how to determine uncertainties resulting from system

imperfections

The uncertainty coefficients are obtained by differentiating (96) thus:

3t~ —^ = (T - T ) -2- (168)

3a n a

3T aA — = (169)

3T^ 1-A

125
8T / aA —^ = - I + 1 j (170)

9T^ \1-A

3T~ a(T - T ) (P^Ap

7.3. Automatic Technique

The working equation for the automatic technique is tne following:

T2_ _ 290 " 290 gP

F = ^ + 1. (106) —- - 1

The uncertainty, 6F, in F comes from uncertainties 6T^, <5T2, SgP-j^/ and SgP^

in T^, T^, gP^, and gP2, respectively. The uncertainty SgP-j^ includes the uncertainty, 6(gP^)^, of detecting the power in gP^ ana zne uncertainty, 6(gPj^)j^, of

displaying this detected power on the panel meter of the ANFM. The uncertainty

6(gP2) includes the uncertainty, 6(gP^)^, of detecting the power in gP2f and the

uncertainty, 6(gP2)^, of holding gP2 constant with the AGC system. The first-order

approximation of 6F is

6F = 6T,

^ + 6T_

^ + 6gP, + 6gP„ . (172)

^ ^ SgPj^ ^ 3gp2

Uncertainties 6T^ and 6T2 are obtained from the specified accuracy of the

noise generator for its two output power levels. Uncertainties 6gP^ and !SgP2

are obtained from the manufacturer of the ANFM, or from measurements made on

the ANFM circuits

In addition to these uncertainties , other measurement errors occur that

do not appear explicitly in the error equation. They depend upon the particular

ANFM design and upon the measurement set-up. Examples include errors due to

cable loss, VSWR, frequency, termination temperature, insertion loss (gasdischarge sources) , and image response. A thorough analysis of all of these

errors has not been made, and is beyond the scope of this guide. The manufacturer's

instruction book on a given automatic noise figure meter usually has an adequate

treatment of the more important of these errors

126
The uncertainty coefficients are obtained by differentiating (106) thus:

3T^ 290 (gP2 - gP^^)

9F gP,

(173)

1

290 (gP2 - gP^^)

dW (T„ - T, ) gP,

(174)

9gPj^ 290 (gP2 - gP^^) =

(T^ - T2) gPi

(175)

9F

(176)

9gP2 290 (gP2 - gP^^)^

7.4. Gain Control Technique

7.4.1. Variable Source Method

The working equation for the gain control technique, using a TLD noise

generator, is the following:

e(I,,)2 R ()) T

F = ^ ^ ^ + 1. (117) 2kT^ (1^2 - 2Idl) T^

The uncertainty, 6F, in F comes from uncertainties, Sl^jj^' ^'d2'

ir

6F is

6T in I,,, R, <i> ' and T , respectively. The first-order approximation of

a q1 u2 a

5F = 51^,

^+ 61^, + 6R IF + 6<^ 11 + 6T^

^ . (177)

S^dl ^^d2 '^a

The uncertainties ^^^2. ^^d2 ^^^^^^^^^ uncertainty in the calibration of

the emission current milliammeter , whereas 6(() represents the uncertainty in the

correction to be applied to because of the effects of the various phenomena

cited in 4.1,1.2. The uncertainty 6R is obtained from the tolerances on the

components that comprise the source impedance of the generator. 6Rmay be

reduced by measurement of the source impedance with accurate instruments. The

uncertainty is obtained by estimation or by measurement.

127
The uncertainty coefficients are obtained by differentiating (117) thus:

!!_ ^

^ R ^ (Id2 - ^dl> ^^^3j

^^dl ^ '^o (^d2 - 2ldl)'

3F e R (t) (I,, ) 2 (179)

3^d2 2 k T^(I^2 - 2Idl)'

— = ^

(180)

3R 2 k T (I - 21,, ) o d2 dl

3F e(I,,)' R — = — (181)

3* 2 k (1^2 - 2Idl)

^

(182)

9T T

128
7.4.2. Fixed Source Method

The working equation for this gain control technique is the following:

(a,) 2 T = (T - T ) ^ T . (123) e n a - a

°'2 ~

1

The uncertainty, ST^, in comes from the uncertainties, ^T^^ , i5T^, 6a^, and

fia^, in T , T , a, , and a„, respectively. The first-order approximation of 6T

is

3f7 9f7 8f~ 9f7

6T = 6T —- + 6T —- + 6a, —- + 6a_ —- . (183) e n a l ^ g^ n a 1 2

Uncertainty 6T^ is obtained from the specifications of the noise generator.

6T is obtained by estimating or otherwise determining the uncertainty in the

a value of T^. and obtained from the specifications of the variable

attenuator. Refer to Section 7.2.1. for a brief discussion of how to treat

uncertainties resulting from system imperfections.

The uncertainty coefficients are obtained by differentiating (123) thus:

9T a_ - 2a, n z 1

(a^)2

(184)

9T a- - 2a, a 2 1

- 1 (185)

9Tg

^ 2{T^ - T^) (a^^ a2 - (a^)^)

da^ (a2 - 2a^)^

9T^ (a^)2 (T^ - T^)

(186)

(187)

9a2 (a2 - 2a^)^

7.5. CW Technique

The working equation for the CW technique is the following:

_ P T

f = TT. T

- + 1- (129)

129
The uncertainty, 6F, in F, comes from uncertainties 6P , 6T , 6B, 6Fi , and

in I of 6F is

6P2, in P^, T^, B, P^, and respectively. The first-order approximation

3F 9F_ 9F 9F_ 9F_

= ^^s 3P ^ ^'^a 3T 3B '^1 3P, ^ ^^2 9P, " ^ ^

s a 12

Uncertainty is obtained from the specifications of the CW generator.

6T is obtained by estimating or otherwise determining the uncertainty in the

a value of T^. 6B is obtained as described in Appendix C. 6P-^ and 6P2 are

obtained from the specifications of the power meter.

The uncertainty coefficients are obtained by differentiating (129) thus:

9F_

(189)

kT

9F_ ^ _ _1

8T '^o a

8F ^s

9B

(190)

(191)

kT

9F P„ P,

_ 8 2

3Pj^ kT^B (P2 - P^)"-

3F PsiP.

(192)

9P2 kT^B (P2 - P^)2

7.6. Tangential Technique

The working equation for the tangential technique is the following:

(193)

F = kT B(S/N)

o ' o

- ^ + 1. o

(139)

130
The uncertainty, 6F, in F comes from uncertainties 6P , 6T , 6B, and

S 3. 6(S/N)^ in Pg, T^, B, and (S/N)^, respectively. The first-order approximation

of 6F is

= ^^s If; ^ ^^a II; ^ H ^ ^(s/N)o T(s7W^ ^^''^

Uncertainty 6?^ is obtained from the specifications of the CW generator.

6T is obtained by estimating or otherwise determining the uncertainty in

a the value of T . 6B is obtained as described in Appendix C. 6 (S/N) is

a o obtained either from the values given in Section 6.6., or by measurement as indicated therein.

The uncertainty coefficients are obtained by differentiating (139) thus:

3F_ ^ 1

8P kT B(S/N)

s o ^

'o

(195)

3F_ ^ _ _1

8T T

a o

3F P

s

(196)

»B kT B2 (S/N)^

3P P

s

(197)

(198; 8(S/N)^ kTQB(S/N)^2

7.7. Comparison Technique

The working equation for the comparison technique is the following:

P P

P i s" m2 xl

X

~ ^m P , P ^

• (154) ml x2

The uncertainty, 6F~, in F comes from uncertainties 6F , 6P , , 6P ^. 6P

, . . _ AX ui' xl'

x2 ^m' -^ml' ^m2' ^xl' ^x2 ' respectively. The first-order

approximation of 6F^ is

131
_ _ 3F 3F 3F dF dF

6f = 6f —- + 6P T —— + 6P _ —— + 6P T —^ + 6P _ —— . (199) m ml Xl

m ml m2 xl x2

Uncertainty 6F^ is obtained from the specifications of the master transducer.

6P^^, '5Pj^2' "^^xl'^^'^ ^^x2' obtained from the specifications of the power

meter

The uncertainty coefficients are obtained by differentiating (154) thus:

3F P T P , _^ = m2 xl (200)

3F P , P - m ml x2

3F F P - P T X = _ ^ xl (201)

3P -, (P , ) ^ P „ ml ml x2

3F F P , x m xl

3P - P , P „ m2 ml x2

(202)

3F F P o X = ^ m2 (203)

3P 1 P 1 P o xl ml x2

3F F P P , X ^ _ m m2 xl (204')

9^x2 ^ml (^x2>'

132
8. MEASUREMENT EXAMPLES

This section is provided to illustrate how F, T^, and their uncertainties

are computed from measurement data. To do this, a hypothetical but typical

two-port amplifier has been "measured" and an error analysis performed for

each of the ten methods described in this Guide. These examples show not only

the comparative accuracies obtained with the various methods for the assumed

conditions, but they also show the relative contributions of the individual

sources of error to the total measurement error. A summary of these results

is given in Table IV.

It must be emphasized that these results apply only to the hypothetical

conditions that are stated. In actual practice, individual circumstances may

cause the accuracies that may be attained by a given measurement method to

differ from those given in this section. The hypothetical amplifier has the

following specifications:

f = 2 GHz

o

B 60 MHz (no image response)

F 6 dB

T 870 K

e

10 5 (50 dB)

Z .1 50 a

z 50 n o

Other Characteristics:

Linear amplitude response

No spurious responses

No spurious signals generated

Perfect shielding

Matched output termination

Proper input termination for desired F, T^

133
m

<D3

cr Hc

x:o

(1)

leasuremei

NN

XX

m

OS TI

rsl

o 870 K

50

dB

cm

01

uH

4J

u

m 0) 0 •H in •H

0) 0

CO 4-1 0 c

OJ

U

rH HI Ifc,

p

n 3

Id

a

x:

c

X

u

C 0 H

M Q) JJ u 3 0

•P 0) CT Id ^ C o 0) 4-1 -H

0) 3 H 4J E a »w OJ O OJ

0) in

m cn o;u

c H-l 3 3 Id C - 0 U-l P

C

V4 <U

£

c OJ Id y-i (d Eh e -p ij —

0) 0) Tl OJ 01 OJo

S 01

a 3 s Id Id E -

14-) in TS

uu OJ

c 0 Id c 0) OJ P -H

0) Id > > Id >1 S m <: < o unMm<

Eh 11

cr> dp dP dP

c r*i ai ID ^ 1 ^ 3 1 0) 0 m o ro in ro 1 3 E ^ 1 r-J cr H 1 >. c OJ 0) a u 1 o ^H CN

OJ 3 Eh 3 Eh

Eh

o 0 -aa

OJ

C 10 to OJ rH OJ CN i c

Ou rH IH

M

rH

u 0) OJ 3 Cn 3 P 3 H 10 10 10 10

Id 0 O

H

H Id >. Id

E UJ

u

o 0 0)U OJ ' u 0 u c c E OJ e OJ 1 ^H p OJ s OJ 3 0 g E S 0 E 0

<:u .-H 0 0 0 a 0 a 1 iH u Id u Vh u u 1 Id Id p b-, Cu 1 P 0 i 0

in Eh 1 ^ p tjp dP dP §

IN

o IN 1 0 in r-t O ID 1 '~'

OJ 1 ^ u^ OJ Id 3 O O u c

cn 3 Eh lc>. OJ 0 OJ Tl 01 C rH H in p tH U c

0>oH

Q 0 c 3 0 1 X IH Id P 0) OJ p p

rH 3 ^ rH Id ID

H Id (D Id

n

fc< 0 0 U 3 H

M •o 3 1 0

in IH Id

c 0 01C 1 u

ta > OJ

c Ida 1*1 OJ • u

u

up

E

P 1 I o E P E E OJ E HJ u rH 0 Id 0 o p O Id 1 ^ u Id u u u u 1 'd u p Cu Cu 1 p 0 I 0 ^ 1 ^ p dP dP dP 1 1^ in O in ID ro 1 1^ 0 r- CN o O ^ o I ^ O E nH rH t IN U < 30

U2 OJ OJ OJ Id

-p dp dP dP dP dP df>

—11I dP

OJ

c

ooO

OO

O 1 O 3 3 1 cr 0 o o in in in in 1 ^ H E m rH 1 m a iS t .c - 1 o * - •- 1 OJ 0, U M rH u IN , Eh

ICn

JJ

E OJ

E OJS OJX OJ

X

pP ChP

p Q)

C

\ Id OJ OJ OJ <u 0 OJ c iw E E e E ; c

UI 0 H

H

H Lh OJ

u

M

u 3 n to 0) OJ 0) 0) 1 ^^

Id 0 0 H 3 3 3 3 0

a,

u 0 0 0 0 0 >-l

E

u

c a. 0,a

a 0 OJ 0> u 0 e E E e E

-H 0 0 0 0 0

Id

uu

uu

u 1 Id Cd p b-, Ch Cu Ch 1 P

o 0 0

rH Eh 1 ^ P dP dP dP dp dP 1 dP C in o m rH , 3

OJ 0 m IN

o in l^ 1 3 m INI cr Hc OJu Id m OJ o a

OJ

Iti- 3 10 0 H 0 .c u

10 OJ

p 10 .H 0) C P U a 0 1 C

Id

uH

c 3 •H < -H

H

H Id OJ 4-1 3 iH

P 3 M

C rH Id

aH 1 - C 0 0 Di n c O — ' 0

OJ in

UH 01 Id 10 0 ' u

CT'u 10 Id Cu J3 0 z 1 >-<

c

u OJ

E 1 OJ

Id 0 e

E OJ

E

E tn

Eh

n 0 0 p 0 0 ^ ! ^

IH Id Vh

u Vh IH Id CJ p Ci^ ClH Cu 1 p 0 • 0

Ol

H Eh 3 M O

•a

u3 a oocEou

Ch

Eou

op

CQ Id T) 3c n OJ P E P O Id

OJ

Pu

C 3

OJ

p

H Id § (U Id aE E OJ O P

IH Cu

4-1 1 c dP dp dP dp dP

u 3 o ID

O 1 r~- OJ 0 p Ol IN o ID 1 ^

OJ a

—

c

OJ

—

c

OJ

iHOo

(Uu s:H 0 OJ 1 3 3 Eh 3 Eh 4J 0 u 0 0 OJ 0. o c 10 CO S 1 c \ u •H • H u 3 01 OJ IH 0 0 M in in OJ 1 M

H-> 02 0 HH 3 0 o U 0 0 0

IdUU

c

ca I u

Cu 0 UI i 1 14 E E E » u nH 0 0 0 tH a Id u Id P Cu Cu Cu -P o 0

Eh 1 ^ P dP dp dP dP dp dP 1 ^ C in O P-l rH O nH 30 IN O in fN tN 1 ^

Am .H ' rH

OJu Id

o

u Eh Vh .H Vh in 3 CO OJ OJ a<

OJ ICu 0 CU .c 4-1 4-1 ||e? 3 in 0) p OJ OJ cr OJ c 4J H T) e E 1 c H u H C 3 H 1 -H c n Id OJ p 3 IH Vh •C 3 tl c H Id Tl OJ OJ i ^ u 0 0 Oi u C 3 3 0

OJ in

u

H OJ Id 0 Vh Eh

er

to Id

aE•Q

a er

s 0 E

E OJEEE

u t4 nHo 0 p 0 0 0

Idu IHu Vh Vh Id cq

ot Cu Cu Cu Cu Cuot 00 1 Eh

OJ

4-1 dP dP dP dP 1 dP

u

p dP dP dP dP dP 1 1^

c:

O IDo 1 u

c ID -H in 1 t^ 3 3 3 0 o IN o 1 0 0 in CN o IN o 1 Vh rH tJJ H rH 1 rH 0P 1

Id •a

OJ 3 OJ X 0) OJ C o o H o LI rH IN

lU Ieh^Vh

£ Vh 0 Vh ' ICu

Cu Ieh^Vh

C Vh Id

aa ! 4-J 3 eh 3 Eh 0 \ 3 H 3 H itu 4J 01 0 0 4-1 rH OJ 0 0 OJ 01 < 0 c CO to Id 0 u c cr. CO rH Vh rH Vh 1 c

VhH 3 ! 'Vh Vh -H .a 0 .Q 0 ' H

M 3 OJ OJ

C

P 3 OJ 0) Id 4-1 Id 4-1 0 0 M in to OJ i ^ C 0 Vh CO CO H Id H Id 1 >-l 4-1 in 0 H H p 0 0 cn 0 H H Vl 3 Vh 3 1 0 U Vh 0 0 p •h a Vh 0 0 Id C Id C 1 Vl

Id Vh Vh

cc Id 1 ^ Vh Vi

c c; > OJ > OJ 1 ^

Cu 0 (d I OJ

c 0 OJ

pp 1 1J 1 VI E E E -rH u E E £ P E p

>H Vh rH 0 0 0 ' iH Id

u rH 0 0 0 Id 0 Id 1 l-l Cd Id Vh Vh M Id O Cd Id VI Vl Vh Vh Id P Cu Cu Cu 1 4-1 p Cu Cu lu Cu 1 4-1 0 ' 0 0 ' 0

fN Eh 1 ^ i ^ Eh 1 ^

OJ0 p dp dP dP dP dP dP ' dp

Vh

c ID in rH IN • rH 3 3 0 0 in o o O 1 1^

C/J Am

rH rH CM

Vh

Id 01 OJ OJ OJ Id -r > o rH o CN V 0 Eh \ ICu

Vh Vl T3u Vh rH 3 H 3 H 3 « 3 iiEH-' 0 0 0 0 0 OJ

VI OJ

C CO CO CO CO

P Vh 1 C

4-1 0 H

c 3 1 ''^

c Vh OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 4J 0 3 H CO CO CO CO H Id • Vh V 0 0 H H H H Vh 1 0

in Vl 0 0 0 0 OJ 1 Vh

c Vhccc

ca 1 Vh

H

u OJe 1 Id 0 E E s E E 0) u n rH 0 0 0 0 0 p 1 i-l Vh Id Vh H Vl Vl Vl 1 Id Cd ot Cu liH Cu Cu Cu ot VD Eh 1 ^

134
8.1. Y-Factor/Power weter Method

a. Given parameters:

= 10,580 K (ENR*= 15.5 dB)

T = 300 K

c

6T, = 200 K

h

6T = 3 K

c

6P = 2% of P

b. Let the calculated value of Y, from (77) , be

Y = 9.79; Y(dB) = 9.9 8 dB

c. From (79)

f- = lQ/580 - (9.79x300) ^ ^^^^

® 9.79 -1

d. From (158), (159), and (160),

3T , —- = = 0.114

8T 9,79 -1

—^"^e 9 79 - = - = -1.114

8T 9.79 -1

c

^^e ^ _ 10,580 - 300 = _ 133 ^

3Y (9.79 -1)

e. The uncertainty 6Y is taken to be the worst-case value, viz.,

6Y = (2% + 2%)Y = 0.040 x 9.79 = 0.392 .

f . From (157)

6T^ = (200 X 0.114) + (3 X 1.11) + (0.392 x 133)

* ENR = Excess Noise Ratio

135
22.8 + 3.33 + 52.1 = 78.2 K

g . Summary

Y = 9.79 (9.98 dB)

T = 870 K

e

6T = 78.2 K (9.0% of T ) 6 6

Components of : From T^^: 22.8 K (2.6%)

From T : 3.3 K (0.4%)

c

From P : 52.1 K (6.0%)

870

h. F = + 1 = 4.00 ( 6.0 dB )

6T

6F = —- = = 0.270

290 290

6F ^ 0.27 ^ 0.067 (6.7% ; 0.28 dB ) F 4.00

8.2. Y-Factor/Attenuator Method

a. Given parameters:

= 10,580 K (ENR =15.5 dB)

= 300 K

6T, = 200 K

n

6T = 3 K

c

6A(dB) = 2% of A(dB)

78.2 K (9.0%)

136
b. Let the calculated value of Y(dB), from (85), be

Y(d3) = 9.98 dB ; Y = 9.79

c. From (79)

T- = 10,580 - (9.79x300 )_ ^

^ 9.79 -1

d. From (158), (159), and (160),

9T , —- = = 0.114

3T. 9.79 -1 n

—^"^e 9 79 - = - = - 1.114

8T 9.79 -1

c

- 10'580 - 300 ^ .133 K

9Y (9.79 -1)

e. The uncertainty 6Y is given by

6Y(dB) = 0.02 X 9.98 dB = 0.20 dB

.-. 6Y = 0.047 Y= 0.0 47 X 9. 79 = 0 .460

f . From (157)

6T = (200x0.114) + (3x1.11) + (0.460x133)

e

= 22.8 + 3.33 + 61.2 ^ 87.3 K

g . Summary

Y = 9.79 (9.98 dB)

T~ = 870 K

e 6T~ = 87.3 K (10.0% of T~)

e e

137
Components of 61^: From T^^ : 22.8 K (2.6%)

From T^: 3.3 K (0.4%)

From A : 61.2 K (7.0%)

87.3 K (10.0%)

h. F = —- + 1 = 4.00 (6.0 dB)

6T p_ - 6F = — = ^ 0.301

290 290

6F 0.301 = 0.075 (7.5% ; 0.31 dB)

F 4.00

8.3. 3-dB/Variable Source Method

a. Given parameters:

<5(f) = 0.62

R = 50 Q

T = 300 K

a

0.5

61^ = 2% of

6<j» = 10% of <|)(f)

5R = 5% of R

6T = 3 K

a

6A = 0.1 dB (2.3%)

b. Let the measured value of be

= 6.50 ma.

138
Note: On an uncorrected TLD noise generator, this would indicate

an F of

F = 6.50 (8.1 dB)

c. From (92)

1.602x10-'^ X 50 X 6.50 x 10"^ .x 0.62 , 300,

F = + (J- - 290"^

2 X 1.381 X 10"^ ^ ^ 290

= 4.033 - 0.0344 = 4.00

d. From (162), (163), (164), (165) and (166),

8F 1.602x10"^^ x50x0.62 _i = = 620 ampere

31, 2x1.381x10"^^ X 290 d

9F ^ 1.602x10"^^ x6.50 x 10"^ xO.62 ^ q qqq^ ohm"^

8R 2x1.381x10"^^ X 290

df 1.602xl0"^^x6.50xl0"^x50

2x1.381x10-2 ^x 290 = 6.50

—dF 1.602x10"^^ x6. 50x10-^x50x0. 62 , — = ±0 . X

9A 2x1.381x10-2^x290x0.25 — = — = -0.00345 K

^ 8T 290

Si

e. The uncertainty 6a is given by

6A = 0.023 X 0.5 = 0.0115 .

f . From (161)

6F= (0.02x6.50x10-^ x 620) + (0.05x50x0.0807) + (0.10x0.62x6.50) +

139
+ (0.0115x16.1) + (3x0.00345)

= 0.0806 + 0.0202 + 0.404 + 0.185 + 0.0104= 0-700

6F ^ 0 .700

F 4.00

0.175 17.5%

g. Summary:

6.50 ma

4.00 (6.0 dB)

6F 0.700 (17.5% of F; 0.70 dB)

Components of 6F: From I^:

From R

From (l)(f)

From A :

From T

0.0806

0 .0202

0.404

0.185

0.0104

0.700

(2.0%)

(0.5%)

(10.1%)

(4.6%)

(0.3%)

(17.5%)

h. T = 290 (4.00 -1) = 870 K

e

6T = 290 X 0.700 = 203 K

e

6T

e 203

= 0.233 -> 23.3%

T 870

e

140
8.4. 3-dB/Fixed Source Method

a. Given parameters:

T,n 10,580 K (ENR = 15.5 dB)

300 K

A 0.5

200 K

n

3 K

a

6a = 2% of a(dB)

6A = 0.1 dB (2.3%)

b. Let the measured value of a(dB) be

a(dB) = - 9.44 dB ; a = 0.1138

c. From (96)

= 0.1138 X (10,580 - 300) - 300 = 870 K

d. From (168), (169), (170) and (171),

—- = (10,580 - 300) — = 10,2 80 K

3a 1 - 0.5

e 0.1138x0.5 0.1138

3T. 1-0,5

n

141
e ^ 0.1138(10,580 - 300) ^ ^gg^ ^

3A (1 - 0.5)

e. The uncertainty 6a is given by

6ot(dB) = 0.02 X 9.44 dB = 0.189 dB

.-. 5a = 0.045a = 0.045 x 0.1138 = 0 .00506

f. The uncertainty 6A is given by

6A = 0.023A = 0.023x0.500 = 0 .0115

g. From (16 7)

6T~ = (0.00506x10,280) + (200 x 0.1138) + (3x1.1138) + (0.0115x4680)

= 52.0 + 22.8 + 3.34 + 53.8 = 131.9 K

h. Suramary

a = - 9 . 4 4 dB

T = 870 K

e

6t = 131. 9K (15.2% of T ) e e'

Components of 6T^: From a : 52.0 K (6.0%)

From T : 22.8 K (1.6%) n

From T : 3.34 K (0.4%)

cl

From A : 53.8 K (6.2%)

131.9 K (15.2%)

14 2
F = + 1 = 4.00 (6.0 dB)

290

6T~ — G 131 9 6F = —- = iiLiZ = 0.455

290 290

§1. = 0.455 ^ (11.4% ; 0.47 dB ) F 4,00

Automatic Technique

Given parameters

= 300 K

T2 = 10,580 K (ENR = 15.5 dB)

g = • 10"* (40 dB)

6T^ = 3 K

= 400 K

(6gPj^)^ = 2% of gP^

(6gPj^)^ = 3% of gP-^

(6gP2)^ = 2% of gP2

(6gP2)^ = 1% of gP2

(See the NOTE at the end of this example.)

Let the value of gP2 be

gP2 = 9.48 mw.

Let the indicated value of gP^ be

gP^ = 0.969 mw.

143
From (10 6) ,

10 ,580 _ 300 9.48

290 - 290 - 0.969 ^ ^ ^ ^^.^^

9.48 _ ^ 0.969

From (173), (174), (175), and (176)

3Tj^ 290 (9.48 - 0 .969)xl0-^

H 0-969xl0-^ ^ 0.000393 K"^

dT^ 290(9.48 - 0.969)xl0"'

i^L = (10,580 - 300)9.48x10-^ ^ ^^^^ ^^^^-x

2,,T n — 6 9gP^ 290(9.48 - 0.969)^x10

3F (300 - 10,580)0.969x10-^ = = - 4 7 4 watt-^

8gP2 290(9.48 - 0.969)^x10"^

From (172)

6F = (3x0.00384) + (400x0.000393) +

+ (0.05x0.969x10-^x4640) + (0.03x9.48x10-^x474)

= 0.0115 + 0.157 + 0.225 + 0.135 = 0.529

6F ^ 0 .529 ^ 0.132 ^ 13.2%

F 4.00

Summary:

9.71 (9.87 dB)

gP,

144
F = 4.00 (6.0 dB)

6F = 0.529 (13.2% of F; 0.54 dB)

Components of 6F: From T^^: 0.0115 (0.29%)

From 0.15 7 (3.9%)

6T

e

From gP^: 0.225 (5.6%)

From gP^: 0.135 (3.4%)

0.529 (13.2%)

h. T = 290(4.00 -1) = 870 K

e

6T = 290 X 0.529 = 153 K

e

153 = 0 .176 -> 17.6'

T 870

e

NOTE: Other measurement uncertainties, discussed

in Section 7.3, have not been taken into account

in this example, thus making the results optimistic.

145
6 . Gain Control/Variable Source Method

Given parameters:

(j)(f) = 0.62

R = 50 Q

T = 300 K

a

61^ = 2% of

6(|) = 10% of (j) (f

6r = 5% of R

6T^ = 3 K

a

Let the measured values of I, be d

I^j^ = 19.5 ma .

I, - = 97. 6 ma

az

From (117)

1.602xl0~^^ X (19.52x10"^)^ x50x0.62 _ 300_ ^ ^ 2x1.381x10-^^ X 290 (97. 58-2x19. 52)xl0-^ 290

= 4.034 - 1.034 + 1 = 4.00

From (178), (179), (180), (181), and (182),

1.602x10"^^ x50x0 .62x19.5 xlQ-^ x(97 . 6-19 . 5) xlQ- ^ 1.381x10"^ ^x290 (97.6-2x19.5) ^ xlO"^

551.4 ampere"^

1.602x10"^^ X 50 X 0.62 x (19.5)^ x 10"^

2x1.381x10-2^ x290(97.6 - 2 xl9.5)2 x 10"^

- 6 8.94 ampere"^

146

9F

81dl

8F

81 d2
in = 1.602x10 X (19.5)^ X 10-° x 0.62 ^ 0.0807 ohm'*

9R 2xl.381xl0"^^x290(97.6 - 2xl9.5)xl0"^

9F _ 1.602x10"^^ x50 x (19.5) ^ xlO~^

9(|> 2x1.381x10-2^ x290(97.6 - 2 x 19.5)xl0"^

^ 1_ ^ -0.00345 K"^

9T 290

a

i

From (177)

6F = (0.02x19.5x10-* x 551.4) + (0.02x97.6x10"^ x68.9) +

+ (0.05x50x0.0807) + (0.1x0.62x6.509) + (3x0.00345)

= 0.215 + 0.135 + 0.0202 + 0.4036 + 0.0103 = 0.784

1£= 0.196 -V 19.6%

F 4.00

Summary

I^j^ = 19.5 ma

1^2 ~ 97.6 ma

F = 4.00 (6.0 dB)

6F = 0.784 (19.6% of F; 0.78 dB)

147
Components of 6F: From I^^: 0.215 (5.4%)

From 1^2" 0.135 (3.4%)

From R : 0,0202 (0.5%)

From (() : 0.404 (10.1%)

From : 0 .0103 (0.2%)

0.784 (19.6%)

g. = 290 (4.00 -1) = 870 K

6T = 290 X 0.784 = 227 K

e

6T—^ = =^ = 0.261 ^ 26. 1^ T 870

e

8.7. Gain Control/Fixed Source Method

a. Given parameters:

= 10,5 80 K (ENR = 15.5 dB)

T = 300 K

a

6T = 200 K

n

6T = 3 K

a

6a = 2% of a(dB)

b. Let the measured values of a be

= 0 .228 (-6 .43 dB)

= 0 .210 (-0 . 408 dB)

c. From (123)

T~ = (10,580 -300) ^.ilii^ 300 = 870 K

® 0.910 - 2 X 0.228

148
From (184), (185), (186), and (187),

^'^e ^ 0.228^

8T 0.910 - 2 xO.228

n

0.1138

9T^ y (0.910 - 2 xO.228) /

9T

e _ 2(10,580 - 300) (0.228 x 0.910 - 0.228^) 15420

9a^ (0.910 - 2 X 0.228)

!^ = - 0 -228' (10,580 - 300) ^ _ ^570

9a2 (0.910 - 2 X 0.228)'

The uncertainties, 6a, are given by

6a^ (dB) = 0.02 x 6.43 dB = 0.129 dB

:-6a-^ = 0 .030a^ = 0.030x0.228 = 0 .00683

(dB) = 0.02 X 0.408 dB = 0.00816 dB

6a2 = 0.0019a2 = 0 .0019 x 0 .910 = 0 . 00173

From (183) ,

6T^ = (200x0.1138) + (3x1.1138) + (0.00683x15420) +

+ (0.00173 x 2570)

= 22.8 + 3.34 + 105.3 + 4.45 = 135.9 K

149
g . Summary

= 0.228 (-6.43 dB)

o.^ = 0.910 (-0.408 dB)

T = 870 K

e

6T = 135.9 K (15.6% of T ) e e

Components of 6T^: From T^: 22. 8K (2.6%)

From T: 3.34K (0.4%)

a

From aj_; 105.3 K (12.1%)

From 4.45 K (0.5%)

135. 9K (15.6%)

R 7 n h. F = 1^ + 1 = 4.00 (6.0 dB)

6T'

6F = —- = i£^-L£- = 0 .469

290 290

— = 0 .469 = 0 .117 (11.7% ; (0.48 dB)

F 4.00

8.8. CW Technique

a. Given parameters:

P = 10-^° watt

s

T = 300 K

a

6P = 2% of P

6T = 3 K

a

6B = 5% of B

150
Let the measured values of P-j^ and P2 be

= 9.69 X 10~^ watt (0.097 yw)

P^ = 10.1 X 10~^ watt (10.1 yw)

From (129)

p = 10-^° -300 + 1

1,381x10-^^ X 290 X 6x10 ^ / lO .1x10"^ _ 290

\9. 69x10"^ /

= 4,035 - 1.034 + 1 = 4.00

From (189), (190), (191), (192), and (193),

3F

8P 1,381x10"^^ X 290 x 6x10 10 . 1x10"

= 4.035 X 10-^° watt-^

69x10-

9F 1 „ ..... .,-1 = - 0.00345 K3T 290

a

- - 6.726xl0-« Hz-i

8B 1.381x10-^^ X 290 x 6 ^xlO * VlO .IxlQ-

/ lO.lxlQ-^ _ ^\

\9. 69x10"^ /

3F 10"' " X 10.1 X 10'

3Pj^ 1.381x10"^ ^ X 290 X 6x10^' (10.1x10-^-9.69x10-^)

4.205x10^ watt-^

= - 10-^° X 9.69 X 10-^ „ ^ - 4 .035x10 ^ watf^

9P2 1.381x10-^^ X 290 x 6x10'' (10.1x10-^-9.69x10-^)^

From (188)

6F = (0.02x10-^° X 4 .035x10^") + (3 x 0 .0034 5) +

151
+ (0.05x6x10^x6.726x10-^) +

+ (0. 02x9. 69xl0~^x4 . 205x10'') +

+ (0.02x10.1x10-^x4.035x10^)

0.0807 + 0.0103 + 0.2018 + 0.0815 + 0.0848 = 0.459

6F ^ 0.459

F 4.00

= 0.115 -> 11.5%

f. Summary:

9.69 X 10-^ watt

^2 = 10.1 X 10 ^ watt

P =

s 10-^° watt

4.00 (6.0 dB)

5F 0.459 (11.5% of F; 0.47 dB)

Components of 6F: From P : 0.0807 (2.0^

From T : 0.0103 (0.3%]

From B 0.202 (5.1%)

From P, 0,0815 (2.0!

From P,

g. T = 290(4.00 -1) = 870 K ^ e

6T = 290 X 0 . 459 = 133 K

0.0848 (2.1%)

0.459 (11.5%)

6T

e 133

= 0.153 15.3%

T 870

e

152
8.9. Tangential Technique

a. Given parameters:

T = 300 K

a

(S/N)^ = 11 dB (12.59)

6P = 2% of P

s s

6T = 3 K

a

6(S/N)^ = 1 dB (25.9%)

6B = 5% of B

b. Let the measured value of be

P = 12 .2 X 10"^ ^ watts

c. From (139)

- ^ 12.2 X 10~^^ 300_ ^ ^ 1.381x10"^ ^x290x6xl0^xl2 .59 290

= 4.034 - 1,034 + 1 = 4.00

d. From (195), (196), (197), and (198),

3F ^ 1

3P 1.381x10"^ ^x290x6xl0''xl2. 59

s

= — = - 0 . 00345

3T 290

a

= 0.3305xl0^2watt-^

^ = - ^^'^ ^ 1°"''

= -r 6.72xlO-^Hz:-^

3B 1.381xl0-^^x290x36xl0^'*xl2.59

^ = - 12.2 X 10-^^ ^ _ 0^3205

3(S/N)^ 1.381x10-^ ^x290x6xl0^x( 12. 59)

153
e. The uncertainty 6(S/N)^ is given by

6(S/N)^ = 0.259 X 12.59 = 3.261

f . From (19 4) ,

6F = (0.02 X 12.2xl0"^^x0.3305xl0^^) +

+ (3x0.00345) + (0.05x6x10^x6.724x10"^) +

+ (3.261x0.3205)

= 0.0807 + 0.0134 + 0.2017 + 1.045 = 1.34

^= 1^= 0.335 . 33.5%

4.00

g . Summary

P = 12.2 X 10 watts

s

F = 4.00 (6.0 dB)

6F = 1.34 (33.5% of F; 1.25 dB)

Components of 6F: From P^: 0.081 (2.0%)

From T : 0.013 (0.3%)

Si

From B : 0.202 (5.1%)

From (S/N) : 1.045 (26 .1%) o

h. T = 290 (4 .00 -1) = 870 K

e

6T = 290 X 1.34 = 389 K

e

6T -„„ —- = = 0 .447 -> 44. 7^ T 870

e

1.34 (33.5%)

154
10. Comparison Technique

Given parameters

F = 4.00 (6.0 dB)

m

T = 300 K

a

6f = 0.40 (0.41 dB)

m

6p = 5% of P

(See the NOTE at the end of this example)

Let the measured values of P be

P , = g-TxlO"** watt- mi

P ^ = 9.7x10"^ watt m2

P = 9.6x10"^^ watt

P , = 10.5x10"^ watt xl

P ^ = 9.7x10"^ watt x2

From (15 4)

- ^ 4.00 9.7xl0-^xl0.5xl0-« ^ ^^33 (5.4^3)

^ 9.7x10-^x9.7x10"^

From (200), (201), (202), (203), and (204),

3FX _ 9.7xl0"^xl0.5xl0~^ _ 1.08

9F 9.7x10-^x9.7x10"^

m

^^x ^ _ 4.00x9.7x10-^x10.5x10-^ ^ _ 0. 448x10*

8P , (9.7)^x10-^^x9.7x10-^ ml

3 F _x ^ 4.00x10.5x10-^ ^ 0.448x10^ watt-^

3P „ 9 .7xl0-"x9 .7x10-^ m2

155
3 V

X 4.00x9.7x10-^ „ ,,.__,„8 _i

3P , 9.7x10-^x9.7x10-^ xl

= 0.412x10^ watf

X ^ 4.00x9.7xl0-xl0.5xl0-^ ^ _ 0.447,106 ^^^^-i

3P^2 9,7xl0-^x(9.7) ^xlO"^^

e. From (199) ,

6F^ = (0.40 X 1.08) + (0.05 x 9.7x10-^x0.448x10^) +

+ (0.0 5x9. 7x10-^x0. 4 48x10^) +(0.05x10. 5x10-^x0 .412x10^)+

+ (0.05x9. 7x10-^x0. 447x10^

0.432 + 0.217 + 0.217 + 0.217 + 0.217 = 1.30

6F , ^„ _^ = = 0.300 ^ 30 .0%

F 4.33

x

f. Summary;

F = 4.00 (6.0 dB)

m

6F = 0.40 (10.0% of F ; 0.41 dB)

m m

F^ = 4.33 (6.4 dB)

6F = 1.30 (30.0% of F ; 1.1 dB) X X

Components of 6F : From F : 0.432 (10.0%) x m

From P,: 0.217 (5.0^ ml

From P 0.217 (5.0%) m2

From P,: 0.217 (5.0%) xl

From P,2= 0-217 (5.0%)

1.30 (30.0%:

156
g. T = 290 (4.33 -1) = K

6T = 290 X 1.30 = 377 K

B

6T 377

966

= 0.390 39.0%

NOTE: This example assumes there are no differences between the

transducers. In practice, the transducers will have somewhat

different transfer functions, terminal impedances, and F's. Such

differences may increase the measurement uncertainty.

157
9 . APPENDICES

APPENDIX A

Definitions of Terms

The terms defined in this Appendix have been selected to aid in understanding

this Guide. They by no means represent all the terms pertaining to the subject.

For terms not included, the reader is referred to standard sources and to the

literature. Definitions taken from the IEEE standards are identified in

parentheses at the end of the definition.

158
1. Accuracy - The degree to which a stated or measured value of a quantity

agrees with its true value. Correctly expressed in qualitative terms

(high, low, good, poor), it is often wrongly used to express a quantitative concept which is properly expressed by the term "error" or "uncertainty." For a discussion of this and related terms, see

reference [50]

2. Bandwidth, effective (bandpass filter in a signal transmission system).

- The width of an assiraied rectangular bandpass filter having the same

transfer ratio at a reference frequency and passing the same mean square

of a hypothetical current and voltage having even distribution of energy

over all frequencies. (IEEE Std 100-1972) [51]

Note: In this Guide, effective bandwidth of a filter and noise

bandwidth of a transducer are considered to be identical.

3. Dispersed-Signal Source - A signal source whose available power is

distributed over a range of frequencies. Examples include noise

generators, impulse generators, comb generators, noise-modulated

sinusoids, etc.

4. Effective Input Noise Temperature T^ (of a multiport tranducer with

one port designated as the output port) . - The noise temperature in

kelvins which, assigned simultaneously to the specified impedance

terminations at the set of frequencies contributing to the output, at all

accessible ports except the designated output port of a noisefree

equivalent of the transducer, would yield the same available power per

unit bandwidth at a specified output frequency at the output port as that

of the actual transducer connected to noisefree equivalents of the

terminations at all ports except the output port. (62 IRE 7.S2)

Note 1: A noisefree equivalent of the transducer is one for which all

internal (inaccessible) noise sources are removed, and for which the

termination at the output port is noisefree.

Note 2: The effective input noise temperature may depend significantly

on the impedance and the noise temperature of the termination at the

output port at frequencies other than the specified output frequency.

Note 3: For a two-port transducer with a single input and a single output

frequency the effective input noise temperature T^ is related to the

noise factor F by the equation

T = 290 (F - 1)

159
5. Effective Input Noise Temperature, Average (of a multiport transducer

with one port designateu as tlie output port) . - The noise temperature

in kelvins which, assigned simultaneously to the specified

impedance terminations at all frequencies at all accessible ports

except the designated output port of a noisefree equivalent of the

transducer, would yield the same total noise power in a specified

output band delivered to the output termination as that of the actual

transducer connected to noisefree equivalents of the terminations at

all ports except the output port. (62 IRE 7.S2)

Note 1: A noisefree equivalent of the transducer is one for which all

internal (inaccessible) noise sources are removed and for which the

termination at the output port is noisefree.

Note 2 : The load is to be taken as noisefree over the output frequency

band when determining the delivered output power.

Note 3: T^ m^ depend significantly on the impedances and averaged

noise temperatures of the termination at the output port within frequency

bands other than the specified output frequency band.

Note 4: For a two-port transducer with a single input and a single

output frequency band, the average effective input noise temperature

T^ is related to the average noise factor F by the equation

T~ = 290 (F - 1)

e

6. Error - The difference between the stated or measured value and the true

value of a quantity. Usually expressed in the same units as the quantity,

or in per cent.

7. Linear Transducer - A transducer for which the pertinent measures of all

the waves concerned are linearly related. (IEEE Std 100-1972)

Note 1: By linearly related is meant any relation of linear character

whether by linear algebraic equation, by linear differential equation, by

linear integral equation, or by other linear connection.

Note 2: The term WAVES CONCERNED connotes actuating waves and related

output waves, the relation of which is of primary interest in the problem

at hand

150
8. Noise - Unwanted disturbances superposed upon a useful signal that tend

to obscure its information content. (IEEE Std 100-1972)

Note: When applied to the measurement of noise factor and effective

input noise temperature, a randomly fluctuating signal which would be

classified as noise in a communications system becomes a useful signal

for the purposes of the measurement.

9. Noise Bandwidth - See bandwidth, effective.

10. Noise Factor (Noise Figure) (of a Two-Port Transducer). - At a specified

input frequency the ratio of 1) the total noise power per unit bandwidth

at a corresponding output frequency available at the output port when the

Noise Temperature of its input termination is standard (290 K) at all

frequencies to 2) that portion of 1) engendered at the input frequency by

the input termination at the Standard Noise Temperature (290 K)

(57 IRE 7.S2)

Note 1: For heterodyne systems there will be, in principle, more than one

output frequency corresponding to a single input frequency, and vice

versa; for each pair of corresponding frequencies a Noise Factor is

defined. 2) includes only that noise from the input termination which

appears in the output via the principal-frequency transformation of the

system, i.e., via the signal-frequency transformation (s ) , and does not

include spurious contributions such as those from an unused imagefrequency or an unused idler-frequency transformation.

Note 2: The phrase "available at the output port" may be replaced by

"delivered by system into an output termination."

Note 3: To characterize a system by a Noise Factor is meaningful only

when the admittance (or impedance) of the input termination is specified,

11. Noise Factor (Noise Figure) , Average (of a Two- Port Transducer) . - The

ratio of 1) the total noise power delivered by the transducer into its

output termination when the Noise Temperature of its input termination

is standard (290 K) at all frequencies, to 2) that portion of 1)

engendered by the input termination. (57 IRE 1 .32)

Note 1: For heterodyne systems, 2) includes only that noise from the

input termination which appears in the output via the principal-frequency

transformation of the system, i.e., via the signal-frequency transformation (s), and does not include spurious contributions such as those from

an unused image- frequency or an unused idler-frequency transformation.

161
Note 2 : A quantitative relation between the Average Noise Factor F and

the Spot Noise Factor F(f) is

/ F(f)G(f)df

p _ Jo

/"°°G(f)df

where f is the input frequency, and G(f) is the transducer gain, i.e.,

the ratio of 1) the signal power delivered by the transducer into its

output termination, to 2) the corresponding signal power available from

the input termination at the input frequency. For heterodyne systems,

1) comprises only power appearing in the output via the principalfrequency transformation i.e., via the signal-frequency transformation (s)

of the system; for example, power via unused image- frequency or unused

idler- frequency transformation is excluded.

Note 3: To characterize a system by an Average Noise Factor is meaningful

only when the admittance (or impedance) of the input termination is

specified.

12. Noise Factor (Noise Figure), Spot. See: Noise Factor (Noise Figure) (of a Two-Port Transducer), (57 IRE 7.S2)

Note: This term is used where it is desired to emphasize that the Noise

Factor is a point function of input frequency.

13. Noise Temperature (general) (at a pair of terminals and at a specific

frequency) . - The temperat\ire of a passive system having an available

noise power per unit bandwidth equal to that from the actual terminals.

(IEEE Std 100-1972)

Note: Thus, the noise temperature of a simple resistor is the actual

temperature of the resistor, while the noise temperature of a diode

through which current is passing may be many times the observed absolute

temperature

14. Noise Temperature (standard) . - The standard reference temperature T^ for

noise measurements is 290 kelvins . (IEEE Std 100-1972)

Note: kT^/e = 0.0250 volt, where e is the electron charge and k is

Boltzmann's constant.

15. Plasma Noise - Random noise generated by non-equilibrium processes in

a gas discharge device or its solid-state equivalent. See reference [52]

162
16. Port (electronic devices or networks) - A place of access to a device or

network where energy uxay be supplied or withdrawn or where the device or network variables may be observed or measured. (IEEE Std 100-1972)

Notes: (A) In any particular case, the ports are determined by the way

the device is used and not by its structure alone. (B) The terminal

pair is a special case of a port. (C) In the case of a waveguide or

transmission line, a port is characterized by a specified mode of propagation and a specified reference plane. (D) At each place of access, a separate port is assigned to each significant independent mode of propagation. (E) In frequency changing systems, a separate port is also

assigned to each significant independent frequency response.

17. Precision - The degree to which a collection of measurement results

cluster together. Usually expressed in qualitative terms (e.g., high,

low, moderate, good, poor). For a discussion of this and related terms,

see reference [50].

18. Random Noise - Noise that comprises transient disturbances occurring at

random. (IEEE Std 100-1972) Examples include thermal noise, shot noise,

and plasma noise. Examples may not include impulsive noise, ignition

noise, and interference of a non-random nature.

19. Signal-to-noise ratio - The ratio of the value of the signal to that

of the noise. (IEEE Std 100-1972)

Note: When dealing with random noise, this ratio is a power ratio,

usually expressed in decibels.

20. Shot Noise - Random noise generated by a non-equilibrium process in

which fluctuations occur on an otherwise steady-state flow of current.

See references [35] and [53]

21. Source - That which supplies signal power to a transducer or system.

(IEEE Std 100-1972)

22. Termination - A one-port load that teirminates a section of a transmission

system in a specified manner. (IEEE Std 100-1972)

23. Thermal Noise - Random noise generated by thermal processes in equilibrium

with their environment. See reference 127]

163
24. Thermionic Diode, temperature- limited - A vacuum diode tube operating

with a cathode temperature and a cathode-anode voltage such that all

electrons emitted from the cathode are collected at the anode.

25. Transducer - A device by means of which energy can flow from one or more transmission systems or media to one or more other transmission

systems or media, (IEEE Std 100-1972) Examples include amplifiers,

receivers, mixers, detectors, attenuators, couplers, transformers,

filters, etc.

26. Transducer gain - The ratio of the power that the transducer delivers

to the specified load under specified operating conditions to the

available power of the specified source. (IEEE Std 100-1972)

Notes: (A) If the input and/or output power consists of more than

one component, such as multifrequency signals or noise, then the

particular components used and their weighting must be specified.

(B) This gain is usually expressed in decibels.

27. Uncertainty - The amount of lack of absolute certainty in the value

of a quantity or measurement result. Usually expressed either in

the same units as the quantity, or in percent. Example: "The

measured value of is 40 0 K; the uncertainty in this value is

20 K or 5%.

164
APPENDIX B

Treatment of Errors

This Appendix deals very briefly with the treatment of measurement errors.

A thorough treatment of this subject is beyond the scope of this Guide, and

may be foxind by reference to the literature [50], [54], [55].

Measurement Errors

A measurement error is the difference between the true value and the

measured value of a quantity. Measurement errors are of two types: systematic

and random. A systematic error is an error caused by a bias in some feature of

the measurement system, and is the difference between the true value and

the limiting mean of a set of measured values of a quantity. A random error

is an error caused by a random process , and is often expressed in terms of the

standard deviation of the measurement data.

Measurement errors result primarily from uncertainties in the data. They

can also result from procedural mistakes, but this source of error can be

removed by using care, repeating measurements, cross-checking, and a variety

of other procedural methods. Uncertainties in the data come from such sources

as (a) uncertainties in the true value of a meter or dial reading,

(b) uncertainties in the calibration of an instrument, (c) imprecision in

the indicated meter reading due to random fluctuations or poor resolution,

(d) variations in the parameter being measured during the measurement interval,

and (e) variations caused by hioman frailties in performing the measurement.

The total measurement error is obtained by means of an error equation.

The error equation comes as a result of an error analysis of the measurement

process, and contains terms which represent the individual sources of error.

The total error of a measurement normally consists of both systematic and

random errors. In general, the error equation applies separately to both

types of errors. Thus, the error equation is used twice, once for systematic

errors and once for random errors . The total error is then expressed in two

parts; viz., a systematic part and a random part. In some cases, one type

may predominate over the other, in which case the total error may be substantially systematic or random. For proper use of error equations, refer

to the section on Pooling Errors, below.

165
Repeating Measurements

Measurements should be made more than once for the following reasons

a. Gross errors and mistakes may be revealed.

b. The average result usually has a smaller error than each individual

result.

c. The spread of the individual results provides an estimate of the measurement error.

Repeating the measurement many times can reduce the random error, but it

will not reduce the systematic error. Systematic error is reduced by using

test equipment having greater inherent accuracy, and by eliminating any erroneous

adjustments or procedures.

Random error is expressed in terms of the standard deviation, s, of the

measurement data. It is common practice to take 3s (three standard deviations)

as the random error of the measured value of the parameter.

Standard deviation decreases with the square root of the number of measurement

results, n. Significant improvements accrue as n increases from one to two

to three, but note that the relative improvement decreases with increasing n. Seldom is it worth while to repeat measurements of the type given in this Guide

more than ten times

Pooling Errors

Independent systematic errors are combined algebraically. That is, if one

error is positive {+) and the other negative (-) , the total of these two errors

is their algebraic sum. If a systematic error can be either positive or negative

(±) then judgement must be excercised when combing it with other errors. Unless

knowledge about an error directs otherwise, the worst-case combination should

be used. This normally means that the errors are pooled by adding their absolute

values, thus disregarding their algebraic signs. If there is some interdependence

(correlation) between individual errors, it may be taken into account to obtain

a pooled error that is smaller than their worst-case sum.

Random errors are combined on a root-mean-square basis. That is, the two

errors, Aa and Ab, produce a total error, Ac, given by the equation

Ac = [(Aa)2 + (Ab) ^]^. (205)

166
When there is a question as to whether an error is systematic or random,

usual practice is to pool it with other errors on a worst-case basis.

Obtaining Measurement Uncertainties

In order to estimate a measurement error, it is necessary to obtain quantitative values for the uncertainties in the data. The usual source of information

for systematic measurement uncertainties is the manufacturer's accuracy specification for the particular test equipment involved. An alternative and possibly

superior source is a recent calibration certificate for the instrument, which

should include the limits of error on the calibration results. Lacking either

of these sources , measurement uncertainties can be obtained by measuring a known quantity with the instrument, and comparing the measurement results with

the known value.

Random uncertainties are obtained from a statistical analysis of the data.

Refer to standard textbooks on the subject for procedures [56] , [57]

167
APPENDIX C

Measurement of Noise Bandwidth

Certain of the measurement techniques discussed in this Guide (see Sections

3.5 and 3.6) require a value for the noise bandwidth, B, of the transducer. In

other techniques , a knowledge of B is useful to interpret the measurement

results, as, for example, to distinguish between "broad band noise factor" and

"narrow band noise factor." This Appendix is a brief discussion of techniques

for measuring B.

Noise Bandwidth

Noise bandwidth, B, is defined in terms of a fictional gain function having

the shape of a rectangle (see figure 32) . The area. A, enclosed by this

rectangle is, by definition, the same as the area beneath the actual gain

function, G(f), of the transducer or system involved (see figure 33), where

A = -^gG(f)df . (206)

The height (gain) , G^, of the fictional gain function is chosen as discussed

below. The width, B, of the fictional gain function is then determined by the

area under the actual gain function, and is, by definition, this area divided

by the height of the fictional gain function.

Therefore, to determine the noise bandwidth of a transducer or system, two

quantities must be known; viz., (1) the area under the actual gain function,

and (2) the value of gain for which noise bandwidth is computed. These two

quantities are discussed below.

Measurement of Area A

The first step to obtain A is to measure the gain function, G(f), of the

transducer. Techniques for doing this are well established and referenced in

the literature [58] , [59] . They include point-by-point techniques and sweptfrequency techniques. Variations on the several techniques have been devised

to meet particular measurement problems imposed by frequency range, dynamic

range, terminal impedances, feedback, leakage, interference susceptibility, and

noise factor.

The next step is to produce a plot of G(f) on linear graph paper. If G(f)

is known analytically, it can be plotted from its equation. If data on G(f) is

in tabular numerical form, G(f) is plotted manually. Some measurement techniques

for G(f) produce data directly as a curve, either on an X-Y plotter, or on an

168
>-o

(i)9 'NIV9

u

c:o

o

•r—

CVJ CO

(U

169
4-> O

c

3

CD

«4- o

rOU

•I—Q.

>)

CO

CO

0)

s170
oscilloscope screen which must then be photographed or the curve can be traced.

In any event, the area may then be determined by any of the well-known

techniques such as (a) counting squares, (b) use of a planimeter, or (c) linear

line-segment approximation [60 ] . If the plot is on semi-log or log- log

coordinates, or if the data are in decibels rather than as a simple ratio of

powers, perform whatever steps are necessary to obtain the equivalent results

as from a linear plot of power ratio versus frequency.

Measurement of Gain G

o

Gain G^ is measured by any of several well established techniques as mentioned in the preceeding section. G^ may be assigned the arbitary value of

unity "1", and the values of G(f) are then measured relative to G^.

The choice of measurement frequency, f^, at which G^ is evaluated, is, in

principle, arbitrary. That is, B can be determined from any value of G(f), and

the computed value of F will be independent of the choice of f^ as explained

below. However, f^ should be chosen such that G^ may be measured accurately;

therefore f^ is normally chosen in a range where G(f) is large. In the case

of a simple gain function having a shape similar to that shown in figure 33,

f^ is commonly chosen as the frequency of maximum gain.

Computation of B

Transducer noise bandwidth, B, is computed simply by dividing the value of

A by the value of G . ^ o f G(f)df

B = ^=^5_^ (207) o o

In cases where the transducer has gain in more than one frequency interval

(multiple-response systems) the interval (s) for which A is evaluated must be

stated. Also, the frequency f at which G is evaluated should be stated to

o o complete the information concerning B.

The uncertainty, 6B, in the value of B comes from uncertainties 6 A and 6G

o in A and G^, respectively. The first-order approximation of 6B is

6B = 6A If H- 6G^ II- . (208)

171
Uncertainty 6 A is obtained by evaluating the uncertainties in (a) gain measurement (power meter error) , (b) frequency measurement (frequency meter error)

and (c) the technique used to determine A (planimeter error, etc.). <5G^ is

obtained from the power meter specifications.

The uncertainty coefficients are obtained by differentiating (208) thus:

^ = ^

(209)

3A G.

8B

3G G

o (

2 (210)

Choice of f o

The reason why f^ is arbitrary is explained as follows: Note that in the

CW technique, F is given by the equation

F =

k T

- T^ ^

1 o

(129)

where

= k(T^ + Tg) G(f)df (126)

and

t^a ^e) Jo P2 = k(T^ + T^) I G(f)df + P3 G^. (127)

By definition.

B = 4g G(f)df

(9)

172
From (126) and (127),

- 1 =

P

s G

o

(211)

Substituting (9) and (211) into (129) gives

F =

P

s (212)

, ^ /V G(f)df P G

k T -'fs so

° G P— o 1

For a given measurement set-up, all of the quantities in (212) EXCEPT G^

are independent of the choice of f^ . But G^ has no effect on the computed

value of F since its effect on B is exactly cancelled by its effect on the

quantity (P2/P-|^) - 1. Therefore, f^ may be chosen at any frequency except

where G(f) is zero (B is then undefined).

A similar argument can be presented based upon the Tangential technique.

173
10, SUGGESTED READING

The published literature on noise factor and noise factor measurement is

quite extensive. It represents a large fraction of the total literature on

noise, which itself is vast. To read it all is for most people an impractical

task. However, from this huge resource may be selected certain papers which

have various valuable features that recommend themselves

Basic to the understanding of noise factor and effective input noise temperature are the tutorial papers and standards written by the IEEE Subcommittee 7.9

on Noise [12] , [15] , [42] . A very helpful recent book on this subject is a small one by Mumford and Scheibe [13J , which, although succinct, covers the

subject clearly and in a way that is adequate for many purposes.

To obtain a historical perspective of the subject, one should read the

original papers by North [10] and Friis [11] who presented the first discussions

of noise factor in the open literature. Goldberg's paper [18] is a good but

dated review of Friis' work. As the siabject has matured, various circuit models

have been proposed as bases for interpreting observations , and the one by Rothe

and Dahlke [B87] has received good acceptance.

The practice of measuring and specifying noise factor has not been without

its trials and tribulations. It is helpful to read the frustrations and

travesties described by Cohn [8] and Greene [9] in order to be alerted to common

and sometimes subtle difficulties that continue to plague the unwary.

The techniques of noise factor measurement are described in a large number

of books and papers. Unfortunately, some of these are misleading or too

simplistic, and in other cases, incorrect. Although old, Lebenbaum's chapter

[B73 ] in the Handbook of Electronic Measurements, Vol. II, is still an excellent treatment of the subject. The IEEE paper on measurement methods [15]

should also be read.

The literature contains hundreds of articles pertaining to noise generation

and noise sources of various types. The classic papers by Johnson [27]' Nyquist

[B33], Schottky [B40 ] and Mumford [37] should be read for historical perspective. The paper by Hart [B24] is an excellent review of the basic principles of

thermal, diode, and discharge gas sources suitable for noise factor measurements.

Gupta [35] provides an up-to-date review of solid-state noise sources, including

an extensive list of references. Potential accuracy capabilities are discussed

in IEEE Standards Report No. 294 [45] .

Finally, for help in the treatment of measurement errors, Zapf's chapter

[50] on "Accuracy and Precision", in the Basic Electronic Instrument Handbook,

will be found useful.

174
11. REFERENCES

1. A Note on Two Definitions of Noise Figure in Radio Receivers

MacDonald, D. K. C.

Philosophical Magazine

June 1944, Vol. 35, No. 245, 386-395

2. Discussion on "Noise Figurers of Radio Receivers"

Friis, H. T.

Proceedings IRE

Feb. 1945, Vol. 33, No. 2, 125-127

3. Optimum Noise Performance of Linear Amplifiers

Haus, H. A. and R. B. Adler

Proceedings IRE

Aug. 1958, Vol. 46, No. 8, 1517-1533

4. On The Definition of Noise Peformance

Rhodes, D. R.

Proceedings IRE

Jan. 1961, Vol. 49, No. 1, 376

5. Comment on 'On The Definition of Noise Performance'

Talpey, T. E.

Proceedings IRE

Jan. 1961, Vol. 49, No. 1, 376-377

6. A Completely Consistent Definition of Temperature Sensitivity

Including Negative Conductance Devices

Fisher, S. T.

Proceedings IRE

Feb. 1962, Vol. 50, No. 2, 204

7. A New Method of Characterizing Amplifier Noise Performance

Engen, G. F.

IEEE Trans. Instrumentation & Measurement

Nov. 1970, Vol. IM-19, No. 4, 344-349

8 . The Noise Figure Muddle

Cohn, S. B.

Microwave Journal

Mar. 1959, Vol. 2, 7-11

9. 'Noisemanship' - The Art of Measuring Noise Figures Nearly

Independent of Device Performance

Greene, J. C.

Proceedings IRE

July 1961, Vol. 49, No. 7, 1223-1224

10. The Absolute Sensitivity of Radio Receivers

North, D. 0.

RCA Review

Jan. 1942, Vol. 6, 332-343

11. Noise Figures of Radio Receivers

Friis, H. T.

Proceedings IRE

July 1944, Vol. 32, No. 7, 419-422

12. Description of The Noise Performance Of Amplifiers and

Receiving Systems

Proceedings IEEE

Mar. 1963, Vol. 51, No. 3, 436-442

175
13 . Noise Performance Factors in Communications Systems

Mumford, W. W. and E. H. Scheibe

Horizon House - Microwave, Inc., Dedham, Mass.,

1968, Chapt, IV., 25-32

14. IRE Standards on Electron Tubes: Definitions of Terms,

1962 (62 IRE 7.S2)

Proceedings IEEE

Mar, 1963, Vol. 51, No. 3, 434-435

15. IRE Standards on Methods of Measuring Noise in Linear Twoports,

1959

Proceedings IRE

Jan. 1960, Vol. 48, No. 1, 60-68

16. An Automated Precision Noise Figure Measurement System at 60 GHz

Boyle, D. R. , F. R. Clague, G. R. Reeve, D. F. Wait and

M. Kanda

IEEE Trans . Instrumentation & Measurement

Nov. 1972, Vol. IM-21, No. 4, 543-549

17. Microwave Theory and Applications

Adam , S . F

Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

1969, 495

18. Some Notes on Noise Figures

Goldberg, H.

Proceedings IRE

Oct. 1948, Vol. 36, No. 10, 1205-1214

19 . Microwave Theory and Applications

Adam, S. F,

Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

1969, 494

20 . Microwave Theory and Applications

Adam , S . F

Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

1969, 495-498

21. An Automatic Noise Figure Meter For Improving Microwave

Device Performance

Poulter, H. C.

Hewlett-Packard Journal

Jan. 1958, Vol. 9, No. 55, 1-3, 5-8

22. Automatic Indication of Receiver Noise Figure

Haneman, F. G. and A. J. Hendler

Topics In Noise, Airborne Inst. Labs., L. I., N. Y.

Aug. 1960, 5-11

23. Handbook of Microwave Measurements

Wind, M. and H. Rapaport (ed.)

Polytechnic Inst, of Brooklyn, Ann Arbor, Mich.,

Edwards Brother Inc.,

1955, 16-8, .16-9

24. Visual Measurement of Receiver Noise

Williams, D.

Wireless Engineer

Apr. 1947, Vol. 24, 100-104

176
25. Refrigerated Microwave Noise Sources

Eisele, K. M.

IEEE Trans. Instrumentation & Measurement

Dec. 1964, Vol. IM-13, No. 4, 336-342

26. Design and Development of a Standard White Noise Generator and

Noise Indicating Instrument

Zucker, H. , Y. Baskin, S. I. Cohn, I. Lerner, and

A. Rosenblum

IRE Trans. Instrumentation

Dec. 1958, Vol. 1-7, Nos. 3 & 4, 279-291

27. Thermal Agitation of Electricity in Conductors

Johnson, J. B.

Physical Review

July 1928, Vol. 32, 97-109

28. Measurement of Effective Temperature of Microwave Noise

Sources

Wells, J. S., W. C. Daywitt and C.K.S. Miller

IEEE Trans . Instrumentation & Measurement

Mar. 1964, Vol. IM-13, No. 1, 17-28

29. A Precision HF Noise Power Measurement System

Arthur, M. G.

ISA Transactions

1971, Vol. 10, No, 264-268

30. Temperature-Limited Noise Diode Design

Slinkman, R. W.

Sylvania Technology

Oct. 1949, Vol. 2, 6-8

31. A Solid-state Broad-Band Microwave Noise Source

Haitz, R. H. and F. L. Opp

IEEE Trans . Electron Devices

Feb. 1969, Vol. ED-16, No. 2, 240

32. Schrot-Ef feet in High-Frequency Circuits

Ballantine, S.

J. Franklin Institute

Aug. 1928, Vol. 206, 159-167

33. Emission Stabilization of Thermionic Diode Noise Sources

Randall, M. W. and M. G. Arthur

NBS Technical Note 160

Sept. 1962, 9 pages

34. A Coaxial-Line Diode Noise Source for U-H-F

Johnson, H.

RCA Review

Mar. 1947, Vol. 8, 169-185

35. Noise in Avalanche Transit-Time Devices

Gupta, M. S.

Proceeding IEEE

Dec. 1971, Vol. 59, No. 12, 1674-1687

36. The Avalanching Transit-Time Diode - A New Semiconductor

Microwave Device

Val'dPerlov, V. M. , A. V. Krasilov and A. S. Tager

Radio Eng. Electron Phys . (USSR)

Nov. 1966, Vol. 11, 1764-1779

177
A Broad-Band Microwave Noise Source

Miomford, W. W.

Bell System Technical Journal

Oct. 1949, Vol. 28, No. 4, 608-618

Measured Noise Temperature Versus Theoretical Electron

Temperature for Gas Discharge Noise Sources

Olson, K. W.

IEEE Trans . Microwave Theory & Techniques

Sept. 1968, Vol. MTT-16, No. 9, 640-645

Linearity Range of Noise-Measuring Amplifiers

Bell, R. L.

Wireless Engineer

Apr. 1947, Vol. 24, No. 282, 119-122

Errors in Noise Measurements Due to the Finite Amplitude

Range of the Measuring Instrument

Cohn, C. E.

Review Scientific Instruments

June 1964, Vol. 35, No. 6, 701-703

Transmission-Line Mismatches and System Noise Figure

Imboldi, E.

Electrical Communication

1965, Vol. 40, No. 2, 233-241

Representation of Noise in Linear Twoports

Proceedings IRE

Jan. 1960, Vol. 48, No. 1, 69-74

The Influence of Mismatch Error in Noise Performance Measurements

Brady, M. M.

Proceedings IEEE

Sept. 1967, Vol. 52, No. 9, 1075-1076

New Equation Analyzes Mismatch Errors in Noise Measurements

Pastori, W. E.

Microwaves

Apr. 1968, Vol. 7, No. 4, 58-63

State of the Art of Measuring Noise Temperature of Noise

Generators

IEEE Standards Report No. 29 4 May 1969, 8 pages

Stability Requirements and Calibration of Radiometers When

Measuring Small Noise Powers

Greene, J. C.

Proceedings IRE

Mar. 1957, Vol. 45, No. 3, 359-360

To be pi±)lished (Arthur, M. G.)

Applications and Analysis of Noise Generation in N-Cascaded

Mismatched Two-Port Networks

Mukaihata, T.

IEEE Trans . Microwave Theory & Techniques

Sept. 1968, Vol. MTT-16, No. 9, 699-708

178
49 . Response of a Linear Rectifier to Signal and Noise

Bennett, W. R.

Bell System Technical Journal

Jan. 1944, Vol. 23, No. 1, 97-113

50. Basic Electronic Instrument Handbook

Coombs, C. F. Jr. (Editor-in-Chief)

McGraw-Hill Book Company

1972, Chapter 4 by T. L. Zapf, 4-1 to 4-20

51. IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms

Westman, H. P. (Chairman)

John Wiley & Sons, New York

1972, 716 pages

52. Current Fluctuations in the Direct-Current Gas Discharge

Plasma

Parzen, P. and L. Goldstein

Physical Review

June 1, 1951, Vol. 82, No. 5, 724-726

53. Physical Sources of Noise

Pierce, J. R.

Proceeding IRE

May 1956, Vol. 44, No. 5, 601-608

54. An Introduction to Scientific Research

Wilson, E. B. Jr.

McGraw-Hill, New York

1952, 373 pages

55. Experimententation and Measurement

Youden , W . J

National Science Teachers Association

Vistas of Science Series, New York

1962, 127 pages

56. Experimental Statistics

Natrella, M. G.

NBS Handbook 91

(Washington, D. C, U. S. Government Printing Office)

1966, 496 pages

57. Statistics Manual

Crow, E. L., F. A. Davis and W. M. Maxfield

Dover Publications , New York

1960, 288 pages

58. Handbook of Electronic Measurements

Wind, M. (Editor)

Polytechnic Inst, of Brooklyn, New York

1956, Vol. II, Chapter X by W. Lynch, 10-1 to 10-32

59 . Electronic Measurements

Terman, F. E. and J. M. Pettit

McGraw-Hill, New York

1952, Second Edition, Chapter 8, 311-379

60 . A Note on Noise Factor Measurement

Hildner, E. G.

ESSA Technical Report ERL 133-WPL 9,

Oct. 1969, 94 pages, (16-17)

179
12. BIBLIOGRAPHY

In addition to the references cited in the text of this Guide,

the technical literature contains many papers and books that are

useful to the person making noise measurements . A selection from

this vast literature is given below. Additional papers can be found

by using the references contained in these papers

This bibliography is divided into three broad categories

Measurement Techniques, Noise Sources, and General Noise Topics

12.1. Measurement Techniques

Direct-Reading Noise-Figure Indicator

Chase, C. E.

Electronics

Nov. 1955, Vol. 28, No. 11, 161-163

B2. A Direct-Reading Instrument for the Measurement of Noise Factor

and Its Application to the Testing of Microwave Mixer Crystals

Dresel, L.A.G., L. A. Moxon and E. E. Schneider

Journal Scientific Instruments

Sept. 1948, Vol. 25, No. 9, 295-298

B3 . A. M. Receiver Noise Factor Measurements Using Sinewave Test

Signals

Golding, J. F.

Electronic Engineering

Aug. 1968, Vol. 40, 420-422

B4. Practical Technique for Noise-Figure Measurement

Klarl, J. F. and H. W. Lamberty

Electronic Design

Aug. 30, 1962, 4 pages

B5. How to Measure Noise

Koblick, S. N.

Electronic Products

Nov. 1964, 34

B6 , Absolute Measurement of Receiver Noise Figures at UHF

Maxwell, E. and B. J. Leon

IRE Trans . Microwave Theory & Techniques

Apr. 1956, MTT-4, No. 4, 81-85

B7 . Noise Figure Measurement

Minck , J . and E . Smith

Instruments & Control Systems

Aug. 1963, Vol. 36, No. 8, 115-118

B8. A Survey of Techniques in Microwave Noise Measurement

Mukaihata, T.

ISA Transactions

Oct. 1964, Vol. 3, No. 4, 342-352

B9 . Measuring Microwave Noise - A Series of Notes

Pas tori, W. E.

7th Annual Region 3 IEEE Convention

Nov. 18-20, 1968, Sec. 4, Paper 5, 1-8

180
BIO. Direct-Reading Noise-Factor Measuring Systems

Peter, R. W,

RCA Review

June 1951, Vol. 12, No. 2, 269-281

Bll. Microwave Noise Figure Measurements Using a Signal Generator

Saul, R. and E. L. Luloff

Microwave Journal

Apr. 1959, Vol. 2, No. 4, 33-36

B12 . A Guide To Accurate Noise Measurement

Sleven, R. L.

Microwaves

July, 1964, Vol. 3, No. 7, 14-21

B13. A Noise Figure Meter Having Large Dynamic Range

Strum, P. D.

IRE Trans. Instrumentation

Oct. 1955, Vol. PGI-4, 51-54

B14 . An Automatic Noise Figure Indicator

Stumpers, F.L.H.M. and N. Van Hurck

Philips Technical Review

1956/1957, Vol. 18, Nos. 4/5, 141-144

B15 . An Absolute Method of Measurement of Receiver Noise Factor

Ullrich, E. H. and D. C. Rogers

Proceedings lEE

1946, Vol. 93, Part III-A, No. 1, 233-234

B16. Considerations for the Precise Measurement of Amplifier Noise

Wait, D. F.

NBS Technical Note 6 40

Aug. 1973, 125 pages

12.2 Noise Sources

B17 . Spectral-Noise Characteristics of Glow Discharges in the

Frequency Range lkc/s-8Mc/s

Barker, K. and F. A. Benson

Proceedings lEE

June 1966, Vol. 113, No. 6, 937-942

B18. A Gas-Discharge Noise Source for Eight-Millimeter Waves

Bridges, T. J.

Proceedings of the IRE

May 1954, Vol. 42, No. 5, 818-819

B19 . Electrical Noise Generators

Cobine, J. D. and J. R. Curry

Proceedings IRE

Sept. 1947, Vol. 35, No. 9, 875-879

B20. Quantum Theory of Fluctuations

Ekstein, H. and N. Rostoker

Physical Review

Nov. 15, 1955, Vol. 100, No. 4, 1023-1029

B21. Noise Spectrum of Temperature-Limited Diodes

Fraser, D. B.

Wireless Engineer

Apr. 1949, 129-132

181
B22, A New Helical Coupled Noise Source

Gribben, H. C.

Marconi Instrumentation

Sept. 1961, Vol. 8, No. 3, 67-70

B23. A Noise Diode For Ultra-High Frequencies

Groendijk, H,

Philips Technical Review

1958/59, Vol. 20, No. 4, 108-110

B24. Standard Noise Sources

Hart, P.A.H.

Philips Technical Review

July 25, 1962, Vol. 23, No. 10, 293-324

B25. Gaseous Discharge Super-High-Frequency Noise Sources

Johnson, H. and K. R. Deremer

Proceedings IRE

Aug. 1951, Vol. 39, No. 8, 903-914

B26. A Novel Microwave Noise Temperature Generator Having An Output

Temperature of from below 40 to above 370 K

Jordan, P. R. Jr.

Review Scientific Instruments

Nov. 1970, Vol. 41, No. 11, 1649-1651

B27. Avalanche Diodes as Transfer Noise Standards for Microwave

Radiometers

Keen, N. J.

Radio & Electronic Engineer

Mar. 1971, Vol, 41, No. 3, 133-136

B28. Determination of the Electron Temperature in Gas Discharges

by Noise Measurements

Knol, K. S.

Philips Research Report

1951, No. 6, Vol. 6, 288-302

B29. Gas Discharge Noise Sources In Pulsed Operation

Kuhn, N. J. and M. R. Negrete

IRE International Conventional Record

Mar. 1961, Vol. 9, Pt. 3, 166-173

B30. Some Noises with 1/f Spectrum, a Bridge Between Direct

Current and White Noise

Mandelbrot, B.

IEEE . Trans . Information Theory

Apr. 1967, Vol. IT-13, No. 2, 289-298

B31. Data on the Temperature Dependence of X-Band Fluorescent * Lamp Noise Sources

Mumford, W. W. and R. L. Schafersman

IRE Trans . Microwave Theory & Techniques

Dec. 1955, MTT-3, No. 6, 12-17

B32. Maintenance-Free Cryogenic Noise Standard for Continuous

Antenna Operation Independent of Elevation Angle

Mukaihata, T. and P. S. Roberts

IEEE Trans. Instrumentation & Measurement

Nov. 1970, Vol. IM-19, No. 4, 403-407

182
B33. Thermal Agitation of Electric Charge in Conductors

Nyquist, H.

Physical Review

July 1928, Vol. 32, 110-113

B34. Thermal and Quantum Noise

Oliver, B. M.

Proceedings IEEE

May 1965, Vol. 53, No. 5, 436-454

B35. Reproducible Gas Discharge Noise Sources as Possible

Microwave Noise Standards

Olson, K. W.

IRE Trans. Instrumentation

Dec. 1958, Vol. 1-7, Nos . 3&4, 315-318

B36. Apparent Frequency Dependence of the Microwave Power

Radiated from Gas Discharge Noise Sources

Olson, K. W.

IEEE Trans . Microwave Theory & Techniques

Sept. 1971, Vol. MTT-19, No. 9, 776-778

B37. Helium-Cooled Reference Noise Source in a 4-kMc Waveguide

Penzias, A. A.

Review Scientific Instruments

Jan. 1965, Vol. 36, No. 1, 68-70

B38. Effect of Space Charge and Transit Time on the Shot

Noise in Diodes

Rack, A. J.

Bell System Technical Journal

Oct. 1938, Vol. 17, No. 4, 592-619

B39. Measurements on a Solid-State Noise Source

Roberts, J. A. and W. Gosling

Radio & Electronic Engineer

Dec. 1970, Vol. 40, No. 6, 323-324

B40. Uber Spontane Stromschwankungen in Verschiedenen

Elektrizi tats leitern

Schottky, W.

Ann. Phys . (Leipzig)

Dec. 1918, Vol. 57, 541-567

B41. Small-Shot Effect and Flicker Effect

Schottky, W.

Physical Review

July 1926, Vol. 28, 74-103

B42. An Appraisal of Four Types of High-Level Video

Noise Sources

Shepertycki, T. H.

Canadian Electronics Engineering

Feb. 1963, Vol. 7, 36-40

B43. Microwave Thermal Noise Standards

Stelzried, C. T.

IEEE Trans . Microwave Theory & Techniques

Sept. 1968, Vol. MTT-16 , No. 9, 646-655

B44. Helix Coupled Gas Tube Noise Sources

Steward, K.W.F.

Marconi Review

1958, 2nd Quarter, Vol. 21, No. 129, 43-55

183
B45. A Low-Temperature Microwave Noise Standard

Trembath, C. L. , D. F. Wait, G. F. Engen and W. J. Foote

IEEE Trans . Microwave Theory & Techniques

Sept. 1968, Vol. MTT-16, No. 9, 709-714

B46. Noise in Solid-State Devices and Lasers

Van Der Ziel, A.

Proceedings IEEE

Aug. 1970, Vol. 58, No. 8, 1178-1206

B47. Noise in Semiconductors and Photoconductors

van Vliet, K. M.

Proceedings IRE

June 1958, Vol. 46, No. 6, 1004-1018

12.3. General Noise Topics

348. Noise-Factor Dependence on Mismatch of Low-Level R.F.

Signal

Anand, Y.

Electronics Letters

Feb. 25, 1971, Vol. 7, No. 4, 111-112

B49 . Noise in Microwave Transistors

Baechtold, W. and M.J.O. Strutt

IEEE Trans . Microwave Theory & Techniques

Sept. 1968, Vol. MTT-16, No. 9, 578-585

B50. Power Law Detector

Bare, C. C. , A. Steppe and D. Thacker

Proceedings IEEE

Dec. 1965, Vol. 53, No. 12, 2155-2156

B51. Micro-Wave Measurements

Barlow, H. M. and A. L. Cullen

Constable & Co. LTD., 10 Orange St. London W.C.2

1950, 307-310

B52. Noise in Transistor Circuits - 1. Mainly on Fundamental

Noise Concepts; 2. Noise Figure: Negative Feedback:

Measurements

Baxandall, P. J.

Wireless World

Nov. 1968, 388-392 & Dec. 1968, 454-459

B53. The Noise Factor of Four-Terminal Networks

Becking, A. G. Th., H. Groendijk and K. S. Knol

Philips Res. Rep. 10

Oct. 1955, 349-357

B54. Electrical Noise

Bell, D. A.

D. Van Nostrand Co., LTD, New York

1960, 340 pages

B55. Electrical Noise

Bennett, W. R.

McGraw-Hill, New York

1960, 280 pages

184
B56. The Theory of Low-Temperature Bolometer Detectors Applied

to the Measurement of Low-Level RF Power

Birx, D. L. and N. Fuschillo

IRE Trans. Instrumentation

Dec. 1958, Vol. 1-7, Nos . 3&4, 310-315

B57 Circle Diagrams for Representing the Relationship Between the

Noise Factor and Source Admittance of a Linear Two Port

Bridgen, R.

Electronic Engineering

June 1966, Vol. 38, 392-393

B58. Noise in Transistor Amplifier Circuits

Crawford, B.

Electro-Technology

Nov. 1962, Vol. 70, No. 9, 63-70

B59 _ Random Signals and Noise

Davenport, W. B. Jr., and W. L. Root

McGraw-Hill, New York

1958, 389 pages

B50. A Note on Receivers For Use in Studies of Signal Statistics

Deutsch, R. and H, V. Hance

IRE Convention Record

1953 Vol. 1, Ft. 8, 7-13

B61. Corrections and Coordination of Some Papers on Noise Temperature

Dyke , E

Proceedings IRE

Apr. 1961, Vol. 49, No. 4, 814-815

B62. The Rectification of Signal and Noise

Francis, V. J. and E. G. James

Wireless Engineer

Jan. 1946, Vol. 23, 16-25

B63. Principles of Noise

Freeman , J . J

John Wiley & Sons, New York

1958, 299 pages

B6 4. Measurement of Receiver Noise

Gardner, F. F.

Proceedings IRE Australia

Oct. 1960, 654-659

B65. Microwave Engineering

Harvey, A. F.

Academic Press, London & New York

1963, 784-795

B66. An Extension of the Noise Figure Definition

Haus , H. A. and R. B. Adler

Proceedings IRE

May 1950, Vol. 45, No. 5, 690-691

B67. Noise-Figure Measurements - Definitions, Techniques and Pitfalls

Hendler, A. J.

Topics in Noise

Aug. 1960, 1-4

185
B6 8. Noise Factor

Hendler, A. J. and M. T. Lebenbaum

Handbook of Microwave Measurements

Polytechnic Press, Polytechnic Inst, of Brklyn., N. Y.

1963, Vol. Ill, Chapt. XVII, 865-887

B69. An Analysis of the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Ultra-HighFrequency Receivers

Herold, E. W.

RCA Review

Jan. 1942, Vol. 6, 302-331

B70. Spiral Chart Relates Noise Figure and Noise Temperature

Hudson, A. C.

Microwaves

Sept, 1965, Vol. 4, No. 9, 68

B71. Electronic Noise: The First Two Decades

Johnson, J. B.

IEEE Spectrum

Feb. 1971, Vol. 8, No. 2, 42-46

B72. Noise Characterization of Linear Twoports in Terms of

Invariant Parameters

Lange, J.

IEEE J. Solid State Circuits

June 1967, Vol. SC-2, No. 2, 37-40

B7 3. Measurement of Noise Figure

Lebenbaum, M.

Handbook of Electronic Measurements

Polytechnic Inst, of Brklyn, New York

1956, Vol. II, Chap. XI, 11-1 to 11-51

B74. Noise and Fluctuations: An Introduction

MacDonald, D. K. C.

John Wiley & Sons, New York

1962, 118 pages

B75. Equating 'Noise-Temperature' with 'Noise Figure'

MacGlashan, D. W.

Electronic Industries

Nov. 1961, 108-110

B76. How to Measure FET Noise

Mclntyre, R. and T. Prosser

EEE Circuit Design Engineering

Oct. 1966, Vol. 14, 56, 58, 60

B77. Noise Generators and Measuring Technics

Melman, I. J.

Tele-Tech

May 1950, Vol. 9, No. 5, 28-29, 58, 60-61

June 1950, Vol. 9, No. 6, 26-28, 86

July 1950, Vol. 9, No. 7, 36-38, 61, 62, 64

Sept. 1950, Vol. 9, No. 9, 83-85

B7 8. Effects of Some Component Tolerances and Measuring

Errors on Noise Measurements

Merlo, D., E. W. Houghton and G. J. Halford

Electronics Letters

June 1966, Vol. 2, No. 6, 226

186
An Introduction to Statistical Communication Theory

Middleton, D.

McGraw-Hill, New York

1960, 1140 pages

Noise Standards, Measurements, and Receiver Noise Definitions

Miller, C.K.S., W. C. Daywitt and M. G. Arthur

Proceedings IEEE

June 1967, Vol. 55, No. 6, 865-877

Technique of Microwave Measurements

Montgomery, C. G. (Editor)

McGraw-Hill, New York

1947, 228-231

Radio Noise Measurement Methods and Standards

Mumford, W. W.

NBS J. Res. -Radio Science

May 1964, Vol. 68D, No. 5, 536-538

Spontaneous Fluctuations of Voltage

Moullin, E. B.

Oxford At The Clarendon Press

1938, 200-205

Noise Figure and Its Measurement

Oliver, B. M.

Hewlett-Packard Journal

Jan. 1958, Vol. 9, No. 5, 3-5

The Effect of Mismatched Components on Microwave

Noise-Temperature Calibrations

Otoshi, T. Y.

IEEE Trans . Microwave Theory & Techniques

Sept. 1968, Vol. MTT-16 , No. 9, 675-686

The Effect of Fluctuation Voltages on the Linear Detector

Ragazzini, J. R.

Proceedings IRE

June 1942, Vol. 30, No. 6, 277-287

Theory of Noise Fourpoles

Rothe, H. and W. Dahlke

Proceedings IRE

June 1956, Vol. 44, No. 6, 811-818

Probing Transistor Noise

Sato, T.

EDN-EEE

May 15, 19 71, Vol. 16, No. 10, 21-26

Finding True Receiver Sensitivity

Schultz, J. J.

CQ

Nov. 1968, Vol. 24, No. 11, 43-48

A Linear Detector and Integrator for Low Frequency

Noise Measurements

Smi th , D . T

J, Physics E - Scientific Instruments

June 1970, Vol. 3, 472-474

187
Noise in Electron Devices

Smullin, L. D. and H. A. Haus (Editors)

Technology Press of Mass., Inst. Of Technology,

John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chapman & Hall, London

1959, 413 pages

A Note on Noise Temperature

Strum, P. D.

IRE Trans . Microwave Theory & Techniques

July 1956, Vol. MTT-4, No. 7, 145-151

Noise

van der Ziel, A.

Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J.

1954, 443 pages

Noise: Sources, Characterization, Measurement

van der Ziel, A.

Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J.

1970, 184 pages

A Graphical Method for the Determination of Equivalent

Noise Bandwidth

Vigneri, R. , G. G. Gulbenkian and N. Diepeveen

Microwave Journal

June 1968, Vol. 12, No. 6, 49-52

Selected Papers on Noise and Stochastic Processes

Wax, N. (Editor)

Dover Publications, New York

1954, 337 pages

Understanding Receiver Noise Figure and Sensitivity

West, J. T.

Popular Electronics

Nov. 1971, 33-37

Introduction to Microwaves

Wheeler, G. J.

Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J.

1963, 171-175

On Probability Distributions for Filtered White Noise

Wolff, S. S. and J.' L. Gastworth

IEEE Trans . Information Theory

July 1967, Vol. IT-13, No. 3, 481-484

Noise in Electronic Devices

Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York

1961, 413 pages

Swept Noise-Figure Measurements

Microwave Journal

July 1971, Vol. 14, No. 7, 58

188 •{j U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1974 0-547-
FORM NBS-114A (1-71)

2. Gov't Accession

No.

U.S. DEPT. OF COMM.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA

SHEET

1. PUBLICATION OR REPORT NO.

NBS-MN-142

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

The Measurement of Noise Performance Factors;

A Metrology Guide

3. Recipient's Accession No.

5. Publication Date June 1974

6. Perfonniog Or^nization Code

7. AUTHOR(S)

M. G. Arthur

8. Performing Organization

10. Project/Task/Work Unit Nc 2729103

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Boulder, Colorado 80302

11. Contract/Grant No.

12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address

Same as 9 above

13. Type of Report & Period

Covered

Final

14. Sponsoring Agency Code

IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 74-743 9

16- ABSTRACT (A 200-word or less factual summary of most significant information. If document includes a significant

bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.)

This metrology guide provides the basis for critical comparisons among

seven measurement techniques for average noise factor and effective input

noise temperature. The techniques that are described, discussed, and analyzed include the (1) Y-Factor, (2) 3-dB, (3) Automatic, (4) Gain Control

(5) CW, (6) Tangential, and (7) Comparison Techniques. The analyses yield

working equations and error equations by which accuracy capabilities are

compared. Each technique is also analyzed for (a) frequency range for besj:

measurement results, (b) special instrumentation requirements, (c) speed

and convenience, (d) operator skill required, and (e) special measurement

problems. General instrumentation requirements and practical measurement

problems are discussed for the benefit of the non-expert metrologist.

iVorked examples illustrate the principles involved in applying the working

and error equations. An extensive bibliography and suggested reading list

aid the metrologist to locate additional material on these measurements.

Taken altogether, this guide will be helpful in selecting the best measurement technique for any of a wide range of operational requirements and, onpe

the technique is selected, it will be of further benefit in helping the

metrologist identify where his efforts should be placed to derive the

greatest efficiency and accuracy from his measurement system.

17. KEY WORDS (Alphabetical order, separated by semicolons)

Effective input noise temperature; measurement errors; noise factor; noise

measurements; noise performance factors; noise temperature; Y-factor meas.urements

18. AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

[x1 UNLIMITED.

I I FOR OFFICIAL DISTRIBUTION. DO NOT RELEASE

TO NTIS.

19. SECURITY CLASS

(THIS REPORT)

UNCL ASSIFIED

20. SECURITY CLASS

(THIS PAGE)

UNCLASSIFIED

21. NO. OF PAGES

2 02

22. Price

$5. 45

USCOMM-DC 66244-P7I
READER'S COMMENT AND MAILING LIST FORM

Your comments, accompanied by answers to the following questions, help us produce

better publications for your use. If your answer to a question is "No" or re- quires qualification, please explain in the space provided below.

Yes No No Opinion

Does this publication meet your needs? I I I I I I

Did you find the material:

Easy to read and understand?

Organized for convenient Use?

Complete?

Arranged for convenient reference?

Written for your technical level? I | | | |

How do you use this publication? I—. i—

As an introduction to the subject? — — —

For advanced knowledge of the subject? —

For information about operating procedures?

As an instructor in a class?

As a reference manual? | | | | | Other

COMMENTS

What other Metrology Guides would be

useful to you or your organization?

Your comments will aid us in selecting topics of future guides

Attenuation Measurements

Near Field Measurements

including Radiation Hazard

Measurements

RF Power and Voltage Measurements

One-port Noise Source Evaluation

Transducers as applied to

Precision Electrical Measurements

Time Domain Measurements

Field Strength Measurements

Anechoic Chambers Performance

evaluation

Shielded Enclosure Evaluation

Automated Precision Electrical

Measurements

Network Analyzers applied to Precision

Electrical Measurements

Other (please specify)

Would you like your name on a MAILING

LIST to receive information about

future Metrology Guides? If so,

please complete the following.

Name

Title

Department

Company

Address

City State

Zip Code

Send this form to:

W. J. Anson

Electromagnetic Metrology

Information Center

National Bureau of Standards

Boulder, Colorado 80302