alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald Eric Alexander, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for reconsideration of his motion: (1) to vacate an order of this court, entered January 6, 1958, which dismissed his appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered July 31, 1956; and (2) to enlarge his time to perfect the appeal, dispense with printing and for assignment of counsel. Motion granted, and order entered February 17, 1958, denying the original motion, vacated. Upon reconsideration, the original motion is granted, and order entered January 6, 1958, dismissing the appeal, is vacated. The appeal will be heard on the *1070original papers (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. Appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the February 1961 Term. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. John F. X. Masterson, Esq., 150 Broadway, New York, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
§ 516.47 Response to subpoenas, orders, or requests for witnesses. ( a ) *Policy.* The involvement of present or former DA personnel in private litigation is solely a personal matter between the witness and the requesting party, unless one or more of the following conditions apply: ( 1 ) The testimony involves official information. (See appendix F—Glossary to this part).
( 2 ) The witness is to testify as an expert.
( 3 ) The absence of the witness from duty will seriously interfere with the accomplishment of a military mission.
( b ) *Former DA personnel.* Former DA personnel may freely respond to requests for interviews and subpoenas except in instances involving official information (paragraph (a)(1) of this section) or concerning expert testimony prohibited by § 516.49. In those instances, the subject of the request or subpoena should take the action specified in §§ 516.41(c) and 516.42.
( c ) *Present DA personnel.* Present DA personnel will refer all requests for interviews and subpoenas for testimony in private litigation through their supervisor to the appropriate SJA or legal adviser.
( d ) *Discretion to testify.* Any individual not wishing to grant an interview or to testify concerning private litigation may seek the advice of an Army attorney concerning the consequences, if any, of refusal. Any individual not authorized to consult with Army counsel should consult with private counsel, at no expense to the government.
1 

### Jones, Ricardo

From: luanne.jeram@lanxess.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 5:15 PM
To: Jones, Ricardo; ONeill, Sandra Subject: Questions on Thiabendazole Preliminary Work plan data requirements for antimicrobial

uses

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed

Dear Ricardo and Sandra,

I hope you are both well.

I have a few questions on the data requirements for the antim icrobial uses presented in the Thiabendazole Preliminary Workplan (March 2014).

1) Indoor residue data (guideline 875.2300) is indicated. Testing on which surfaces/surface residues will be required? What test method(s) should be used? It's difficult to determine how the information presented in the 1996-02 Working Draft Indoor Surface Residue Dissipation (Chapter 6 - Indoor surface residue dissipation) document would be applied to the material preservation uses.

2) Leaching from treated textiles (special st udy) is indicated. Will this be more of a migration test or a leaching test? If leaching, will data from a European laborato ry test method (EN 16105) be acceptable? Are there any test methods that are recommend ed to use as a basis of developing a protocol?

Thank you and please let me know if you require additional information to respond.

Have a good weekend.

Best Regards, Luanne

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Luanne Jeram LANXESS Corporation Material Protection Products 111 RIDC Park West Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15275-1112 Telephone: 412-809-4773 Fax: 412-809-1074 Mobile: 412-925-7339 luanne.jeram@lanxess.com www.US.LANXESS.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including any attach ments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidentia l and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.2 This e-mail, including any attachments, contains information that may be confidential, protected by the attorney-client or othe r applicable privileges, or constitutes non-public information. If you are not the designated r ecipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system without retaining a copy.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133955 Michael F. Cavanagh 

& (18) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, BRIAN NUCKOLS, Justices 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v SC: 133955 

 COA: 277137 

Oakland CC: 2006-078132-AE 

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD 

OF MICHIGAN,

 Defendant, 

and 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & 

ECONOMIC GROWTH/ 

UNEMPLOYMENT AGENCY,

Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the May 9, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.333-48030) and Forms S-8 (No. 333-134316, No. 333-117489, No.33-53589, No. 2-94436, No. 333-57608, No. 333-57575, No. 333-46901, No.333-41363, No. 333-65265, No. 333-41904, No. 333-37308, No. 333-70560 and No.33-63958) of International Rectifier Corporation of our report dated September15, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting,  which appears in this Form10-K.
| /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     |
| Los Angeles, California        |
| September 15, 2006             |

 

----
### **CHAPTER 2005—URBAN PARK AND RECREATION RECOVERY PROGRAM**

Sec.
200501.
Definitions.
200502.
Federal assistance.
200503.
Rehabilitation grants and innovation grants.
200504.
Recovery action programs.
200505.
State action.
200506.
Non-Federal share of project costs.
200507.
Conversion of recreation property.
200508.
Coordination of program.
200509.
Recordkeeping.
200510.
Inapplicability of matching provisions.
200511.
Funding limitations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000032312
<NAME> EMCEE BROADCAST PRODUCTS, INC.
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,023,911
<SECURITIES>                                 4,095,880
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,006,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                    98,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,407,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,701,928
<PP&E>                                       2,904,928
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,908,360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,770,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,155,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        72,987
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,633,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,700,671
<SALES>                                      1,823,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,823,240
<CGS>                                        1,324,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,108,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (311,593)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,691
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,291
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,291
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to Results30/20 GHz spacecraft GaAs FET solid state transmitter for trunking and customer-premise-service applicationSixteen 30 dB 0.5 W amplifier modules were combined to satisfy the requirement for a graceful degradation. If one module fails, the output power drops by only 0.43 dB. Also, by incorporating all the gain stages within the combiner the overall combining efficiency is maximized. A 16 way waveguide divider combiner was developed to minimize the insertion loss associated with such a large corporate feed structure. Tests showed that the 16 way insertion loss was less than 0.5 dB. To minimize loss, a direct transition from waveguide to microstrip, using a finline on duroid substrate, was developed. The FETs fabricated on MBE grown material, demonstrated superior performances. For example, a 600 micrometer device was capable of 320 mW output power with 5 dB gain and 26.6% efficiency at 21 GHz. The 16 module amplifier gave 8.95 W saturated output power with 30 dB gain. The overall efficiency was 9%. The 3 dB bandwidth was 2.5 GHz. At 17.7 GHz the amplifier had 5 W output power and at 20.2 GHz it still had 4.4 W.Document ID19840008395Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSaunier, P.*(Texas Instruments, Inc. Dallas, TX, United States)*Nelson, S.*(Texas Instruments, Inc. Dallas, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1983Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberTI-08-83-42NASA-CR-168276NAS 1.26:168276Accession Number84N16463Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-22504Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840008395.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 37.1220 Applied research.

Efforts that attempt to determine and exploit the potential of scientific discoveries or improvements in technology such as new materials, devices, methods and processes. It typically is funded in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation programs within Budget Activity 2, Applied Research (also known informally as research category 6.2) programs. Applied research normally follows basic research but may not be fully distinguishable from the related basic research. The term does not include efforts whose principal aim is the design, development, or testing of specific products, systems or processes to be considered for sale or acquisition; these efforts are within the definition of “development.”
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No.333-55234 on Form S-8) of Security Capital Corporation of our report dated March28, 2006 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements andfinancial schedules of Security Capital Corporation and subsidiaries, whichappear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Security Capital Corporation forthe year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 
| /s/  McGladrey & Pullen, LLP |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| New  York, New York              |
| March  31, 2006                  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Quixote Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:



Date: May 9, 2008
By:

/s/LESLIE J. JEZUITLeslie J. Jezuit, Chairman and Chief Executive
OfficerDate: May 9, 2008
By:

/s/DANIEL P. GOREYDaniel P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure.

---



QuickLinks
C. A. No. 77-89.

#### State *v.*Warren J. Fifer.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff.

*William T. Murphy,*for defendant.

The defendant’s motion for bail pending appeal is denied, since a motion for bail pending appeal is pending in Superior Court. This case is remanded to Superior Court for the purpose of the aforesaid bail hearing.
### §2006c. Supervised credit

The Secretary shall provide adequate training to employees of the Farmers Home Administration on credit analysis and financial and farm management to—

(1) better acquaint the employees with what constitutes adequate financial data on which to base a direct or guaranteed loan approval decision; and

(2) ensure proper supervision of farmer program loans.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §361, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XVIII, §1820, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3830.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                            142
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                     682
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   99
<PP&E>                         49,659
<DEPRECIATION>                (27,743)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 20,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,064
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                        961 <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   20,839
<SALES>                         5,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                5,419
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                4,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (543)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                     (543)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (456)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (456)<F2>
<FN>
<F1> Partner equity - 1,190 Partnership units outstanding.
<F2> Per Partnership Unit in thousands.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
(December 15, 1978)

#### Maurice Tischler, Respondent, v Juanita McMillen et al., Appellants.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs (Matter of Bates v *La Vallee,*33 AD2d 833; 10 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac, § 70:27). Cross motion for permission to appeal to this court from order of Special Term dated May 23, 1978 referred to Mr. Justice Main who makes the following decision: Motion denied, without costs. Cross motion for substitution of parties denied, without costs and without prejudice to a proper application to the Supreme Court, Ulster County. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
§ 516.43 Release of Army and other agency records. ( a ) *Preservation of originals.* To preserve the integrity of DA records, DA personnel will submit properly authenticated copies rather than originals of documents or records for use in legal proceedings, unless directed otherwise by Litigation Division. (See 28 U.S.C. 1733.)
( b ) *Authentication of copies.* Copies of DA records approved for release can be authenticated for introduction in evidence by use of DA Form 4. (See § 516.25 for instructions.) ( 1 ) Records maintained in U.S. Army Engineer Districts and Divisions will be forwarded to HQDA(CECC-K), WASH DC 20314-1000.
( 2 ) All other records will be forwarded to the appropriate office at HQDA (See § 516.42).
( c ) *Fees and charges.* AR 37-60 prescribes the schedule of fees and charges for searching, copying, and certifying Army records for release in response to litigation-related requests.
( d ) *Release of records of other agencies.* Normally an individual requesting records originating in agencies outside DA (that is, FBI reports, local police reports, civilian hospital records) that are also included in Army records should be advised to direct his inquiry to the originating agency.
### §2155. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–544, §25, as added Pub. L. 91–579, §22, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1565; amended Pub. L. 94–279, §16, Apr. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 421; Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1012(a), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 711, which required the Secretary of Agriculture to submit an annual report to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives on licensing, investigation, inspection, and other activity related to carrying out this chapter, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 44 of House Document No. 103–7.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-134316, 333-117489, 33-53589, 2-94436, 333-57608, 333-57575, 333-46901, 333-41363,
333-65265, 333-41904, 333-37308, 333-70560 and 33-63958) of International Rectifier Corporation of our report dated September 15,
2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
September 15, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 14.2

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
  the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-111310) of Elron Electronic Industries
  Ltd pertaining to the Employees Stock Option Plans of Elron Electronic
  Industries Ltd. of our report dated February 26, 2003, with respect to the consolidated
  financial statements of Galil Medical Ltd., included in the Elron Electronic
  Industries Ltds Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
  31, 2004.

|                 |                                    | 
|---------------- | ---------------------------------- | 
|Tel-Aviv, Israel | KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER       | 
|March 12, 2006   | A Member of Ernst &
  Young Global | 

12

---
#### In the Matter of Dimitriy R., an Infant. Nassau County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Colleen R. et al., Appellants. (And a Related Proceeding.)

[833 NYS2d 898]

In a child protective proceeding pursuant, to Family Court Act article 10, Colleen R. and Gary R. appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Foskey, J.), dated December 22, 2005, as, after a hearing, found that they neglected the child Dimitriy R., and (2) an order of disposition of the same court dated May 10, 2006, which, inter alia, adjudged that the child Dimitriy R. is a neglected child and placed the child in the custody of the Nassau County Department of Social Services for a period of one year.

Ordered that the appeal from the fact-finding order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the fact-finding order was superseded by the order of disposition dated May 10, 2006; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In a child protective proceeding, the party seeking to establish neglect must show, “first, that a child’s physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired and second, that the actual or threatened harm to the child is a consequence of the failure of the parent or caretaker to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship” *(Nicholson v Scoppetta,*3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004]; *see*Family Ct Act § 1012

El).

The Nassau County Department of Social Services, as the petitioner,. had the burden of proving neglect by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]), and it satisfied that burden. Schmidt, J.E, Mastro, Garni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
§ 251.1 Purpose. This part: ( a ) Implements the responsibilities of the Secretary of Defense in 50 U.S.C. 1913 by establishing the NLSC program.
( b ) Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures for the management of the NLSC program.
( c ) Assigns responsibility to the National Security Education Board (NSEB) to oversee and coordinate the activities of the NLSC (as provided and determined by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 1903 and 1913 with policy and funding oversight provided by the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)) in accordance with DoD Directive 5124.02, “Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R))” (available at *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/512402p.pdf*).
| Exhibit 32 |
|------------|

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert C. Stempel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephan W. Zumsteg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley* Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that based on his knowledge:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Robert C. Stempel                                    

Robert C. Stempel

Chief Executive Officer

May 10, 2006

 

 

/s/ Stephan W. Zumsteg                                

Stephan W. Zumsteg

Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2006