alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 D0 11 4 . ARNOLD A. BOTCHW AY v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 1 7
, Arn o ld Bo t ch way p l ead ed g u i l t y to m u l ti p l e co u n t s of i d en t i t y frau d,
fo rg ery , an d t heft b y t ak i n g

. He recei v ed an ag g reg at e sen t e n c e o f fi ft een y ears , to

s erv e fi v e i n co n fi n em en t an d t h e rem ai n d er o n p ro b at i o n

. In Ap ri l 2 0 1 8
, Bo t ch way fi led a m o ti o n t o v acat e v o i d s en t en ces , arg u i n g t h at cert ai n co un t s s h o u l d h av e

m erg ed

. Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e m o t io n , an d Bo t ch way ap p l i ed t o t h i s Co u rt fo r d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew. W e d i s m is s ed t h e ap p l icat i o n b ecau s e Bo t ch way fai l ed t o rai s e

a v al i d v o i d -s en t en ce cl ai m . See Cas e No . A1 8 D 0 4 70 (d eci d ed J u n e 1 4 , 2 0 1 8 ).
Back i n t he tri al co u rt , Bo t ch way fi l e d a s e co nd m o t i o n t o v acat e a v o id

s en t en ce, arg u i n g t h at h i s s en t en ces were l eg al l y req u i red t o b e co n cu rren t rat h er t h an

co n secu ti v e. On J u l y

2 6
, 2 0 1 8
, t h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e m ot i o n , an d o n Sep t em b er 2 4
, 2 0 1 8
, Bo t ch way fi l ed t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n b ecau se t h e ap p l i cat i o n was n o t t i m el y fi l ed

. To b e ti m el y , an ap p l i cat i o n f o r d i s c ret i o n ary ap p eal m u st b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0
d ay s o f th e en try o f t h e o rd er o r j u d g m en t t o b e ap p eal ed

. See O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ).
Th e req u i rem en ts o f O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d i ct i o n al
, an d t h i s Co u rt can n o t accep t

an ap p l i cat i o n fo r ap p eal no t m ad e i n co m pl i an ce t h erewi t h

. See B o yl e v. S t a t e , 1 9 0
Ga. Ap p

. 73 4
, 7 3 4 (3 8 0 SE2 d 5 7 ) (1 9 8 9). Becau s e Bo t ch way d id n o t fi l e h i s
ap p li cat io n u nt il 6 0 d ay s aft er t he en t ry o f t h e o rd er h e s eek s t o ap p eal
, t h e
ap p li cat io n i s u n t i m el y

. October 17, 2018Th i s ap p l i cat i o n i s t h erefo re DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri sd i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/17/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at Sept. 30, 1997 and the
Company's Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three
and nine months ended Sept. 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9388
<ALLOWANCES>                                       478
<INVENTORY>                                       5379
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 15464
<PP&E>                                            7220
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1955)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   20760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11340
<BONDS>                                           2593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1223
<OTHER-SE>                                        4110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     20760
<SALES>                                          31035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 31272
<CGS>                                            26769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    26769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    35
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (683)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.51)
        

</TABLE>
#### (A) In the Matter of John Cantwell, Petitioner, v. Myles J. Lane et al., Respondents. (B) In the Matter of William P. Rice, Jr., Petitioner, V. Myles J. Lane et al., Respondents.

[In each action] Motion to resettle order dated May 24,1962 determined as follows: the resettled order shall provide for striking the second and third decretal paragraphs of the original order, the latter now of impractical consequence, the insertion of an appropriate provision denying the commission’s motion in respect to petitioner Rice, without costs, and to provide, further, that if the motions have not been rendered academic by a decision of Special Term prior to July 9, 1962, they may be renewed by respondents, if so advised, on that date without oral argument on the papers now before us; but with the further proviso that respondents proceed with due diligence to bring on for determination the pending proceedings before Special Term presently in adjournment at their instance.
<PAGE>   1
                              EAC INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  For The Three Months                 For The Nine Months
                                                    Ended October 31,                   Ended October 31,
                                            ------------------------------       ------------------------------
                                                1997              1996              1997               1996
                                            -----------        -----------       -----------        -----------
<S>                                         <C>                <C>               <C>                <C>         
NET INCOME (LOSS)                           $  (125,059)       $    25,999       $  (173,100)       $   (65,310)
                                            ===========        ===========       ===========        ===========
SHARES:
  Weighted average shares outstanding         2,311,687          2,311,687         2,311,687          2,311,687
  Other - options, warrants etc.                     --                 --                --                 --
                                            -----------        -----------       -----------        -----------
                                              2,311,687          2,311,687         2,311,687          2,311,687
                                            ===========        ===========       ===========        ===========
PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE           $      (.05)       $       .01       $      (.07)       $      (.03)
                                            ===========        ===========       ===========        ===========
</TABLE>

                                 - Exhibit 11 -


                                                                        Page 13.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 176 

Recognizing the historical significance of Lawrence Silas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2023 

Mr. SOTO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the historical significance of Lawrence Silas. 

Whereas, in 1891, Lawrence Silas was born in a rural area 

of Kenansville, Florida, to Tom, a formerly enslaved person, and Elizabeth Silas; 

Whereas Lawrence Silas, in his youth, became the breadwinner for his mother and his 12 siblings upon the passing of his father; 

Whereas Lawrence Silas, with the support from his dear wife, 

Sarah Laurence Silas, overcame financial struggles and 

discrimination biases to gradually transform his passion 

for cattle into a prominent business that aided to the development of his community; 

Whereas despite racism and discrimination, Lawrence Silas 

demonstrated remarkable dedication to work, great perseverance, and impressive entrepreneurial skills; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 176 IH 

Whereas Lawrence Silas’ virtuous character and superb competence as a cattle baron made him a role model for his 

community, and the power of his timeless legacy continues to reverberate in Osceola County; 

Whereas Lawrence Silas’ empathetic leadership helped many 

citizens of his community to overcome financial hurdles 

and to grow their passion for cattle business; 

Whereas Lawrence Silas’ story represents the resilience and 

power of cattle business in Osceola County and highlights 

Florida’s historical engagement with livestock business; 

Whereas Lawrence Silas represents the intelligence, the diligent work attitude, and the courageous spirit of the people in the cattle industry; 

Whereas Lawrence Silas was an influential man in his community despite all discriminations that Black people are 

subjected; 

Whereas Lawrence Silas contributed to the development of 

livestock business in Florida by several means: mastery 

managing his own land with thousands of heads of cattle, 

providing expert advice for affluent dealers and breeders, 

and creating jobs in his community; 

Whereas Lawrence Silas had recognizable knowledge on many 

kinds of cow diseases, which allowed him to handle his 

own cattle as well as from other owners; 

Whereas Lawrence Silas bravely endured all dangers associated with livestock management in a time where hunting 

wild cows was still necessary; and 

Whereas Lawrence Silas was dedicated to cattle work and development throughout his life: Now, therefore, be it 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 176 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Lawrence Silas is a historically signifi3 cant African American who has— 

4 (1) made important contributions for the devel5 opment of livestock business in Florida; and 

6 (2) defeated great challenges in his journey to 

7 becoming a notorious cattleman in a society with 

8 strong racial disparities. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Penny Post et al., Plaintiffs, v Henriette B. Meeler, as Executrix of Walter Meeler, Deceased, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Penny Post et al., Respondents, v Michael Brusilow, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 4, 1977, affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from a further order of the same court, dated February 8, 1978, dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Respondents are awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
### §1013. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 22, 1937, ch. 517, title III, §34, 50 Stat. 526, related to appropriations and expired by its own limitations at end of fiscal year 1940.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          94,594
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,373
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                26,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,005,369
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,508
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,505
<LOANS>                                      1,623,364
<ALLOWANCE>                                     25,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,987,877
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,369,637
<SHORT-TERM>                                   974,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             38,257
<LONG-TERM>                                    100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,791
<OTHER-SE>                                     353,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,987,877
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                145,016
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              180,822
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   336
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               326,174
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             128,242
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             181,909
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          144,265
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    8,571
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,893
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 99,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 78,345
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      78,345
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,725
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,538
<LOANS-PAST>                                     8,785
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   592
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,516
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    8,885
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,349
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               25,551
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            24,427
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              1,124
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 767.17 Liability for damages. ( a ) Any person who engages in an activity in violation of section 1402 or any regulation or permit issued under the Act that disturbs, removes, or injures any U.S. sunken military craft shall pay the United States enforcement costs and damages resulting from such disturbance, removal, or injury.
( b ) Damages referred to in paragraph (a) of this section may include: ( 1 ) The reasonable costs incurred in storage, restoration, care, maintenance, conservation, and curation of any sunken military craft that is disturbed, removed, or injured in violation of section 1402 or any regulation or permit issued under the Act; and
( 2 ) The cost of retrieving, from the site where the sunken military craft was disturbed, removed, or injured, any information of an archaeological, historical, or cultural nature.
### **CHAPTER 97—FRESH CUT FLOWERS AND FRESH CUT GREENS PROMOTION AND INFORMATION**

Sec.
6801.
Findings and declaration of policy.
6802.
Definitions.
6803.
Issuance of orders.
6804.
Required terms in orders.
6805.
Exclusion; determinations.
6806.
Referenda.
6807.
Petition and review.
6808.
Enforcement.
6809.
Investigations and power to subpoena.
6810.
Confidentiality.
6811.
Authority for Secretary to suspend or terminate order.
6812.
Construction.
6813.
Regulations.
6814.
Authorization of appropriations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                           8,256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,718
<INVENTORY>                                    185,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               341,896
<PP&E>                                          74,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 461,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,192
<BONDS>                                        143,226
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       260,357
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,975)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   461,920
<SALES>                                        141,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,944
<CGS>                                          104,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   943
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,728)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,071)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,071)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)


</TABLE>
Opinion issued February 25, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00910-CV

———————————

HSBC BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR

OPTEUM MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ASSET 

BACKED PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-3, Appellant

V.

DENISE A. LEINWEBER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2012-72323-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, HSBC Bank USA National Association, as Trustee for Opteum 

Mortgage Acceptance Corporation Asset Backed Pass Through Certificates, Series 
2

2005-3, has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion 

and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.
§ 211.12 Public outreach. ( a ) The DoD shall establish a Web site accessible to the public that— ( 1 ) Lists the applications that the DoD is currently considering.
( 2 ) Identifies the stage of the action, e.g., preliminary review, referred for mitigation discussions, determined to be an unacceptable risk.
( 3 ) Indicates how the public may provide comments to the DoD.
( b ) The Clearinghouse shall publish a handbook to provide applicants, requesters, and members of the public with necessary information to assist them in participating in the Mission Compatibility Evaluation Process.
§ 761.19 Forms. The following forms shall be used in connection with the processing of applications for authorization to enter defense areas and for revocation of authorizations as indicated: ( a ) *Application.* Statement of Personal History (Form DD 398, Stock Number 0102-004-220) may be obtained from NAVPUBFORMCEN, Building 26, 5801 Tabor Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19120.
( b ) *Entry authorization.* ( 1 ) Defense Area Entry Authorization (OPNAVForm 4600-2 (Rev. 5-59) may be obtained from Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OP-09B33), Navy Department, Washington, DC 20350.
( 2 ) Letter or message authorization.
( c ) *Disapproval of request for entry authorization.* My Dear ______: Your application of ___ has been reviewed and we regret to advise you that the requested authorization for ________ to enter ________ is not granted as the entry at this time for the purpose stated is not considered to be in the interest of national defense. The application may be resubmitted again in six months at which time it will be reconsidered in the light of then existing circumstances. If you desire to appeal this decision, you may do so by submitting a letter to this office setting forth in full why you consider that the granting of the application would be in the interest of national defense and any other information that you believe will be of value of this person considering the appeal. Your letter will be forwarded to the appropriate authority for review and you will be advised in due course of his determination.
Sincerely yours,
( d ) *Revocation of entry authorization.*
My Dear ______: This is to notify you that entry authorization to enter ________ granted by (issuing activity) on ____ is hereby revoked effective this date.
Sincerely yours,
[41 FR 28959, July 14, 1976]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6619

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LEONEL ROMEO CAZACO, a/k/a Phil, a/k/a Jimmy Fingers, a/k/a Frank Nisbett, 

a/k/a James Romeo Nelson, a/k/a Scott,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00066-REP-EWH-6)

Submitted: September 22, 2022 Decided: September 27, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Michael Stewart, LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW M. STEWART, Arlington, 

Virginia, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6619 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Leonel Romeo Cazaco appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no 

abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that, under the pertinent 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors, compassionate release was not warranted. See United States 

v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329-31 (4th Cir.) (providing standard of review and outlining steps 

for evaluating compassionate release motions), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6619 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2