SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control

Date Submitted: April 16, 2020 Subject: Amendment to Regulation 1124

- Contro l of Volatile Organic Compounds

- Section 2.0, Definitions; 12.0 Surface

Coating of Plastic Parts; 19.0

- Coating of Metal Furniture; 20.0

- Coating of Large Appliances; 22.0

- Coating of

Miscellaneous Metal Parts.

Completeness Review Completed by: Ellen Wentw orth /s/

Dat e Completed : October 5, 2010

Administrative Materials

ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision

thereof. 1. Letter dated April 1, 2010 from Collin P. O’Mara , Secretary, Delaware Department of Natural Resources & Environmental

Control to Shawn Garvin, Regional Administrator. X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 2. The Order has an issuance date o f March 11, 2010 , effective

date April 11, 2010. The Order was signed by the Secretary on March 11, 2010. X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. Title 7, Delaware Code, Chap ter 60. X

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the o fficial State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document 4. Copy of the Delaware Regulation No. 11 24

– Sections 2.0

- Definitions; 12.0

- Surface Coating of Plastic Parts; 19.0

- Coating of Metal Furniture; 20.0

- Coating of Large Appliances; 22.0

- Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts, effective April 11, 2010. XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. Secretary = s Order #20 10

- A

- 00 11 dated March 11, 2010. X

6. Evidence that pu blic notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Affidavit s of P ublication from two local newspapers: One

dated November 22 , 2009 for The Sunday News Journal and

one dated November 22, 2009 f or T he Delaware State News

. X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. Certification dated Ap ril 7, 2010 signed by the Program

Administrator , Air Quality Management

. A p ublic hearing w as held on January 5, 2010. X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response

thereto. 8. Hearing Officer = s Report dated February 26, 2010 on t he

responses to comments made on record on the proposed rule of the public hearing held on January 5, 2010. Response Document to Public Comment s dated March 11,

2010. X

Technical Materials

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by th e plan. 1. The plan amends emissions limit of VOCs from source coating categories

- plastic parts, metal furniture, large appliances, and miscellaneous metal parts. X

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including

the EPA attainment/ nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. All ozone non

- attainment areas X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of ch anges in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain 3. See revised regulations for adopted emission limits per EPA’s CTGs for source categories. XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

ls and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the

revision.

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonabl e further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. The plan addresses only the nonatta inment area pollutant of

VOCs. Therefore, PSD increments and protection (maintenance) of NAAQS are not applicable. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), mod es of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. Not applicable. No modeling demonstration was required to support the required revision. X

6. Evidence, where necessary, t hat emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6. Not applicable. X

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensur e emission levels. 7. See each individual source category revision. X

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8 . See each individual source category revision. X

9. Special economic and tec hnological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 9. No special justifications are required. X

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenanc e to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. Not applicable because this is not a section 107 request. X