alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   923
<PP&E>                                           1,656
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              359
<BONDS>                                            873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        350
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,699
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   117
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       61
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     49
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 30
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        30
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Not separately indentified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §2006d. Market placement

The Secretary shall establish a market placement program for qualified beginning farmers and ranchers and other borrowers of farmer program loans that the Secretary believes have a reasonable chance of qualifying for commercial credit with a guarantee provided under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §362, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XVIII, §1821, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3831.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 1730 Lower Tribunal No. 2019

- CA

- 006548

- O

_____________________________
M ARIA J. L OZANO and C ENTRAL F LORIDA P SYCHIATRIC A SSOCIATES , P.A.
, Appellant s ,

v.

F ARAH P ROPERTIES , I NC

. , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. John E. Jordan , Judge.

March 5, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

SMITH
, MIZE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur.

Eric P. LaRue II, of The LaRue Firm, PLLC, Winter Park, for Appellant.

Robert J. Stovash and Joseph E. Somake, of Stovash, Case, Shay & Pearce, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee

.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.104 NDRB Traveling Panel.

An NDRB Panel that travels for the purpose of conducting personal appearances discharge review hearings at locations outside of the National Capital Region (NCR).
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Weatherford International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Lisa W. Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Lisa W. Rodriguez
-------------------------------------
Name:   Lisa W. Rodriguez
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Date:   August 14, 2002
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 14 December 2005 − Regione autonoma della Sardegna v Commission**

**(Case T-200/04)**

State aid – Measures on the part of the Italian authorities aimed at compensating for the damage caused by ovine catarrhal fever (blue
tongue) – Guidelines concerning State aid in the agricultural sector

1.                     *State aid – Prohibitions – Exceptions – Aid to compensate for damage to agricultural production – Aid benefiting undertakings
or activities in the processing sector and intended to compensate for damage caused by animal disease – Aid benefiting cheese-producing
cooperatives – Excluded (Commission Communication 2000/C 28/02, para. 11) (see paras 46-49)*

2.                     *State aid – Investigation by the Commission – No observations from interested parties – No effect on the validity of the Commission’s
decision – Obligation to consider of its own motion information which has not been expressly invoked – No such obligation
(Art. 88(2) EC) (see paras 50-58, 70)*

3.                     *State aid – Investigation by the Commission – Investigation of an aid scheme taken in its entirety – Whether permissible –
Choice made by the Commission in the exercise of its wide discretion to prohibit an aid scheme rather than to approve a scheme
subject to the imposition of possible review measures to be taken by the national authorities in each specific case – Unlawful
interference by the Commission in the review measures laid down under the national law governing the application of the aid
scheme in question – None (see paras 59-61)*

4.                     *State aid – Commission decision finding non-notified aid to be incompatible with the common market – Duty to state reasons
– Information required (Art. 253 EC) (see paras 63-64)*

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| APPLICATION for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 471 final of 16 March 2004 concerning the aid scheme which Italy is planning to implement in favour of processing and marketing cooperatives in order to compensate the damage caused by ovine catarrhal fever (blue tongue) (Article 5 of Law No 22 of the Region of Sardinia of 17 November 2000) |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Dismisses the application; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
Editorial Note on Part 250
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 250 appear at 77 FR 50891, Aug. 22, 2012.

§ 250.907 Where must I locate foundation boreholes? ( a ) For fixed or bottom-founded platforms and tension leg platforms, your maximum distance from any foundation pile to a soil boring must not exceed 500 feet.
( b ) For deepwater floating platforms which utilize catenary or taut-leg moorings, you must take borings at the most heavily loaded anchor location, at the anchor points approximately 120 and 240 degrees around the anchor pattern from that boring, and, as necessary, other points throughout the anchor pattern to establish the soil profile suitable for foundation design purposes.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-21569) of Spinnaker Industries, Inc. and in the related Prospectus
of our report dated February 27, 1998, except for Note 15, as to which the date
is March 26, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Spinnaker Industries, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 26, 1998
### §1508. Report on cybersecurity threats

#### (a) Report required

Not later than 180 days after December 18, 2015, the Director of National Intelligence, in coordination with the heads of other appropriate elements of the intelligence community, shall submit to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives a report on cybersecurity threats, including cyber attacks, theft, and data breaches.

#### (b) Contents

The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) An assessment of the current intelligence sharing and cooperation relationships of the United States with other countries regarding cybersecurity threats, including cyber attacks, theft, and data breaches, directed against the United States and which threaten the United States national security interests and economy and intellectual property, specifically identifying the relative utility of such relationships, which elements of the intelligence community participate in such relationships, and whether and how such relationships could be improved.

(2) A list and an assessment of the countries and nonstate actors that are the primary threats of carrying out a cybersecurity threat, including a cyber attack, theft, or data breach, against the United States and which threaten the United States national security, economy, and intellectual property.

(3) A description of the extent to which the capabilities of the United States Government to respond to or prevent cybersecurity threats, including cyber attacks, theft, or data breaches, directed against the United States private sector are degraded by a delay in the prompt notification by private entities of such threats or cyber attacks, theft, and data breaches.

(4) An assessment of additional technologies or capabilities that would enhance the ability of the United States to prevent and to respond to cybersecurity threats, including cyber attacks, theft, and data breaches.

(5) An assessment of any technologies or practices utilized by the private sector that could be rapidly fielded to assist the intelligence community in preventing and responding to cybersecurity threats.

#### (c) Form of report

The report required by subsection (a) shall be made available in classified and unclassified forms.

#### (d) Intelligence community defined

In this section, the term "intelligence community" has the meaning given that term in section 3003 of title 50.

(Pub. L. 114–113, div. N, title I, §109, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2955.)
§ 634.24 Traffic planning and codes. ( a ) Safe and efficient movement of traffic on an installation requires traffic supervision. A traffic supervision program includes traffic circulation planning and control of motor vehicle traffic; publication and enforcement of traffic laws and regulations; and investigation of motor vehicle accidents.
( b ) Installation commanders will develop traffic circulation plans that provide for the safest and most efficient use of primary and secondary roads. Circulation planning should be a major part of all long-range master planning at installations. The traffic circulation plan is developed by the installation law enforcement officer, engineer, safety officer, and other concerned staff agencies. Highway engineering representatives from adjacent civil communities must be consulted to ensure the installation plan is compatible with the current and future circulation plan of the community. The plan should include the following: ( 1 ) Normal and peak load routing based on traffic control studies.
( 2 ) Effective control of traffic using planned direction, including measures for special events and adverse road or weather conditions.
( 3 ) Point control at congested locations by law enforcement personnel or designated traffic directors or wardens, including trained school-crossing guards.
( 4 ) Use of traffic control signs and devices.
( 5 ) Efficient use of available parking facilities.
( 6 ) Efficient use of mass transportation.
( c ) Traffic control studies will provide factual data on existing roads, traffic density and flow patterns, and points of congestion. The installation law enforcement officer and traffic engineer usually conduct coordinated traffic control studies to obtain the data. Accurate data will help determine major and minor routes, location of traffic control devices, and conditions requiring engineering or enforcement services.
( d ) The (Military) Surface Deployment and Distribution Command Transportation Engineering Agency (SDDCTEA) will help installation commanders solve complex highway traffic engineering problems. SDDCTEA traffic engineering services include— ( 1 ) Traffic studies of limited areas and situations.
( 2 ) Complete studies of traffic operations of entire installations. (This can include long-range planning for future development of installation roads, public highways, and related facilities.)
( 3 ) Assistance in complying with established traffic engineering standards.
( e ) Installation commanders should submit requests for traffic engineering services in accordance with applicable service or agency directives.
Exhibit 12.01


                                  SBARRO, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      FISCAL YEAR
                                                                      -----------

                                       2002            2001           2000              1999            1998
                                     -------         -------        -------           --------        --------
<S>                                  <C>             <C>            <C>                <C>            <C>
Fixed charges:

Interest expense                     $30,959        $ 30,950        $30,243           $ 7,899          $     -
Rental expense                        23,424          24,154         22,412            21,845           20,552
                                      ------          ------         ------            ------           ------

Total fixed charges (1)              $54,383        $ 55,104        $52,655           $29,744          $20,552
                                     =======         =======        =======           =======          =======

Earnings available for fixed charges:

Earnings (2)                         $ 4,165        $(14,573)       $20,113           $48,156          $57,136
Add fixed charges                     54,383          55,104         52,655            29,744           20,552
                                      ------          ------         ------            ------           ------

Total earnings available
    for fixed charges                $58,548        $ 40,531        $72,768           $77,900          $77,688
                                     =======         =======        =======           =======          =======

Ratio of earnings to
    fixed charges (3)                    1.1             0.7            1.4               3.8              3.8
                                         ===             ===            ===               ===              ===

</TABLE>


(1)  Total fixed  charges  consist of interest  and  one-third  of rent  expense
     (deemed to be a reasonable approximation of the interest factor for rent).
(2)  Earnings represents income before income taxes, cumulative effect of change
     in method of accounting,  minority interest and equity in net income (loss)
     of unconsolidated affiliates.
(3)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed  based on dividing
     total earnings available for fixed charges by total fixed charges.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 18


                                                               February 18, 2000


CONFIDENTIAL

CB Bancshares, Inc.
Honolulu, Hawaii

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of CB Bancshares, Inc. and
subsidiaries (Company) as of December 31, 1999 and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and comprehensive income,
and cash flows for the year then ended, and have reported thereon under date of
February 18, 2000. The aforementioned consolidated financial statements and our
audit report thereon are incorporated by reference in the Company's annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. As stated in note B to
those financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for the
recoverability of goodwill and states that the newly adopted accounting
principle is preferable in the circumstances because it is consistent with the
basis used for investment decisions (acquisitions and capital projects) and
takes into account the specific and detailed operating plans and strategies of
each business segment. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and
discussed with Company officials the circumstances and business judgment and
planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting
was based.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have
not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method
of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the
Company's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business
judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Company's circumstances.

                                                               Very truly yours,


KPMG LLP
##### 



ENNIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2007
 EXHIBIT 32.2
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended May 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report.
 /s/ Richard L. Travis, Jr.Richard L. Travis, Jr.Chief Financial Officer Date: July 3, 2007 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
### §6130. Application of programs in the case of collective bargaining agreements

(a)(1) In the case of employees in a unit represented by an exclusive representative, any flexible or compressed work schedule, and the establishment and termination of any such schedule, shall be subject to the provisions of this subchapter and the terms of a collective bargaining agreement between the agency and the exclusive representative.

(2) Employees within a unit represented by an exclusive representative shall not be included within any program under this subchapter except to the extent expressly provided under a collective bargaining agreement between the agency and the exclusive representative.

(b) An agency may not participate in a flexible or compressed schedule program under a collective bargaining agreement which contains premium pay provisions which are inconsistent with the provisions of section 6123 or 6128 of this title, as applicable.

(Added Pub. L. 97–221, §2(a)(2), July 23, 1982, 96 Stat. 231.)
§ 284.2 Applicability and scope. This part applies to: ( a ) The Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the Department of Defense Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the Department of Defense (hereafter referred to collectively as the “DoD Components”).
( b ) The Coast Guard, when it is not operating as a Service in the Navy under agreement with the Department of Homeland Security, the Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service (PHS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) under agreements with the Departments of Health and Human Services and Commerce, respectively (hereafter referred to collectively as the “non-DoD Components”).
( c ) Certain functions for considering waiver applications that, by statute or delegation, are vested in the Department of Defense or the Secretary of Defense.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
section 1350): I, Thomas D. Karol, Chief Executive Officer of ElkCorp, certify to my
knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. section 1350) that:  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2004, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
ElkCorp. Date: May 14, 2004 By /s/ Thomas D. KarolThomas D. KarolChief Executive Officer