alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4617

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD TYRONE PIPKIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(4:05-cr-001129-TLW)

Submitted: November 14, 2007 Decided: December 13, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald R. Hall, West Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Rose

Mary Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*Pipkin erroneously states that the judgment was entered on

March 8, 2007, the date of his sentencing hearing. The Government

erroneously states that the judgment was entered on March 22, 2007,

the date on which the judgment was signed.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Edward Tyrone Pipkin seeks to appeal his conviction and

sentence. Pipkin has filed two motions in this court for an

extension of the appeal period. The Government has moved to

dismiss the appeal as untimely. 

 In criminal cases, the defendant must file a notice of

appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App.

P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of

excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an

extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.

App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th

Cir. 1985).

The district court’s judgment was entered on the docket

on March 23, 2007.* Pipkin filed a letter in the district court

indicating his intent to appeal dated May 3, 2007, after the tenday period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect

period. The letter, however, was not postmarked until May 8, 2007,

after the thirty-day excusable neglect period expired. We construe

Pipkin’s letter as a notice of appeal. See Smith v. Barry, 502

U.S. 244, 248 (1992). Because the notice of appeal may have been

filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to
- 3 -

the district court for the court to determine whether the notice

should be deemed to have been filed within the excusable neglect

period, which expired on May 7, 2007. Fed. R. App. P. 4 (b),

(c)(1). Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). If the district

court determines that Pipkin’s notice was filed within the

excusable neglect period, the court shall determine whether Pipkin

has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension

of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will

then be returned to this court for further consideration.

Pipkin’s motions in this court for an extension of the appeal

period are denied, as only the district court has jurisdiction to

extend the appeal period. We defer action on the government’s

motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

REMANDED
EXHIBIT 32.2



               Certification of Periodic Financial Report by
         Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, George R. Kirkland, Senior Vice-President and Treasurer of Southwest
Georgia Financial Corporation certify that:

  (1)  The Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period
       ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
       requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
       Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Corporation.



                                 By:   /s/George R. Kirkland
                                       George R. Kirkland
                                       Senior Vice-President and Treasurer
                                       (Chief Financial Officer)
                                       Southwest Georgia Financial Corporation
March 31, 2009
#### H. A. Kohler et al., appellants, v. George Boomgarden, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,812.

Action on promissory notes. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ford county; the Hon. Frank Bindley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 6, 1925.

M. H. Scott and F. M. Thompson, for appellants.

Schneider & Schneider, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00139

- CR

Ulyess Hughes
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 329th District Court of Wharton County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 21435

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
June 10, 2021
# /N^or-o^T

- /??^

- ^^^9 ? ^::mRTMENTO F

••' l 

## ''^ORTATfO N OPERATION S 

# TELEPHON E :.:I ^ mP hs s COOPERATIVE , INC
.

Januar y 13,201 1 Hon
. Ra y LaHood , Secretar y U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 RE : Continuatio n o f

Alask aAirlines ' Essential Ai r Servic e at

Cordova , Gustavus , Petersburg , Wrangell , an dYakutat , Alaska , Docke t OST-1998-489 9 Dear Secretary LaHood : Thi s lette r

i s t o expres s ou r

stron g support

fo r th e selectio n o f

Alask aAirline s t o continu e t o provid e essentia l ai r

servic e t o ou r

community
. Th e daU

y je t servic e Alask acurrentl y provide s t o Cordov ai s critica l for

th e continue dacces s an deconomi c wrel l bein g ou r

communit

y require s a s wel l a s tha

t o f thi s entir e regio n o f

th e state . Je t

sei-vice i s wha

t set s Cordov aapar

t fromothe r

rura l area s an dmake s u s aviabl e community
. Alaska' s curren t

pattern o f service , usm g je t

au-craft , meet s crucial need s tha t woul db e difBcult , i f

no t unpossible , t o mee t

wit han y othe r

typ e o f servic e o r

ahcraf t type : Alaska' s servic e connect s Southeas t Alask apassenger s t o on e o r mor e majo r

communitie s o f

interest , wit

h single-plan e servic e t o Anchorage , Juneau , Ketchikan o r Seattle
. Fro mthes e hubs , ou r community ca n acces s th e au-line' s extensiv e rout e syste man dbenefi t marketin g relationship s with other carriers
. Th e 737-40 0 combinatio n passenge r an dcarg o aircraft , whic hAlask aAhlme s propose s t o continu e usin g o n thi s route , provide s freight, mai l an dcarg o capacity that ano n -je t

carrie r simpl y canno t

provide
. Furthe r th e 737-40 0 comb i aircraf t i s equippe dwit

hRequire dNavigatio n Performanc e Technolog y precisio n technology , whic henable s th e airlin e t o reliabl y acces s th e airport durin g inclemen t

weather , thu s reducin g diversion s an dcanceUation s and , i n turn , enablin g peopl e an dproduct s t o dependabl y reac h th e community , h i sum . Alaska' s je t servic e i s critical t o th e economi c we Ubein g o f

our commumty . Fo r thes e reasons , w e respectfuUy urg e DO T t o selec t Alask aAirline s t o contmu e t o provid e essential ai r servic e t o Southeas t

Alaska , a s th e affline ha s successfiill y don e for mor e tha n thirty years . Smcerely , / j
Pau l Kelly , Genera l Manager/CE O c : Susa

n Kurland , Assistan t

Secretary for

Aviatio n an dhitemationa l Affeh s Denni s DeVay , Chief

, EA S an dDomesti c Analysi s Th e Honorabl e Sean Pamell , Governor , Stat e o f Alask a Mar c A
. Luiken , Commissioner , Alask aState Dept
. o f Transportatio n & Publi c FaciUtie s

P O Bo x 45 9 Cordova , A K 9957 4

Phone : 90 7 48 1 23J 5 Pax:90 7 42 4 234 4
**Exhibit 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF HICKORY TECH CORPORATION**

 
| **Subsidiaries**                                    |   | **Jurisdiction of  Incorporation** |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
| Mankato Citizens Telephone Company                  |   | Minnesota                          |   |
| Mid-Communications, Inc.                            |   | Minnesota                          |   |
| Cable Network, Inc.                                 |   | Minnesota                          |   |
| Heartland Telecommunications Company of  Iowa, Inc. |   | Minnesota                          |   |
| Crystal Communications, Inc.                        |   | Minnesota                          |   |
| Minnesota Southern Wireless Company                 |   | Minnesota                          |   |
| National Independent Billing, Inc.                  |   | Minnesota                          |   |
| Collins Communications Systems Co.                  |   | Minnesota                          |   |

 

All such subsidiaries are 100% owned byHickory Tech Corporation. The financial statements of all such subsidiaries areincluded in the Consolidated Financial Statements of Hickory Tech Corporation.

 

1

----
CREDITRISKMONITOR.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share - basic is computed by dividing  net loss less  dividends  on
preferred  stock by the  weighted  average  number of  shares  of  common  stock
outstanding  during  each  year.  Net loss per share - diluted  is  computed  by
dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and
the number of additional  common shares that would have been  outstanding if the
dilutive potential common shares had been issued.  The computation  excludes the
effect of dilutive potential  securities  (convertible  preferred stock, options
and warrants) because their inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect.


                           Loss Per Share Computation
                 For the Years Ended December 31, 1999 and 1998


                                                 1999               1998
                                                 ----               ----

Net loss applicable to common stock          $ (1,252,698)      $ (23,439)
                                             ============       =========

Basic average common shares outstanding         5,341,129         399,830
                                             ============       =========

Net loss per share - basic and dilutive      $      (0.23)      $   (0.06)
                                             ============       =========
### §2327. Plant Variety Protection Board

#### (a) Appointment

The Secretary shall appoint a Plant Variety Protection Board. The Board shall consist of individuals who are experts in various areas of varietal development covered by this chapter. Membership of the Board shall include farmer representation and shall be drawn approximately equally from the private or seed industry sector and from the sector of government or the public. The Secretary or the designee of the Secretary shall act as chairperson of the Board without voting rights except in the case of ties.

#### (b) Functions of Board

The functions of the Plant Variety Protection Board shall include:

(1) Advising the Secretary concerning the adoption of Rules and Regulations to facilitate the proper administration of this chapter;

(2) Making advisory decisions on all appeals from the examiner. The Board shall determine whether to act as a full Board or by panels it selects; and whether to review advisory decisions made by a panel. For service on such appeals, the Board may select, as temporary members, experts in the area to which the particular appeal relates; and

(3) Advising the Secretary on all questions under section 2404 of this title.

#### (c) Compensation of Board

The members of the Plant Variety Protection Board shall serve without compensation except for standard government reimbursable expenses.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title I, §7, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1543; Pub. L. 103–349, §13(a), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3142.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–349 substituted "the designee of the Secretary shall act as chairperson" for "his designee shall act as chairman" in last sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: April 25, 2011 Meeting with Wisconsin Energy on the 2011 NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

 

On April 25, 2011, EPA met with members of Wisconsin Energy, the Accord Group to discuss 

their issues and concerns with the final rule entitled, “Identification of Non-Hazardous 

Secondary Materials That are Solid Waste,” which was published in the Federal Register on 

March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is referred to as the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. 

During that meeting, the industry members expressed concerns with the rule’s impact on the coal 

ash that's "mined" from onsite piles and combusted. The industry members were interested in 

the beneficial use of the coal combustion products. 

EPA asked clarifying questions regarding the information presented. 

Attachment:

Please see the attached document “Coal Combustion Products and Benefits of Ash Fuel Reburn 

and Ash Recovery” for meeting details presented by Wisconsin Energy. 

Expected Meeting Attendees:

Bruce Raymey, VP, Wisconsin Energy 

Pat Quinn, Accord Group 

Invited EPA attendees: 

Jim Berlow, EPA 

George Faison, EPA 

Michael Galbraith, EPA 

Mimi Guernica, EPA 

Michael Svizzero, EPA 

Tab Tesnau, EPA 

Marc Thomas, EPA
### §307104. Inapplicability of division to White House, Supreme Court building, or United States Capitol

Nothing in this division applies to the White House and its grounds, the Supreme Court building and its grounds, or the United States Capitol and its related buildings and grounds.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3232.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 307104 | 16 U.S.C. 470g. | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §107, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 915. |

Section
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

# CERTIFICATION

(Certification of CEO of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Annual Report of Scitex Corporation Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Yahel Shachar,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       
          The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 28, 2006

| |  | /s/ Yahel Shachar
Yahel ShacharChief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Annualreport of the Consumer Advisory Board.**
 
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:FR 2.1/7:
Item Number:0443-G-17 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001061237
 
June 14, 2018
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Ennis Business Forms,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  August
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on
the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Keith  S.  Walters,  Chief
Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,
      in  all  material  respects, the  financial  condition  and
      result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Keith S. Walters

Keith S. Walters
Chief Executive Officer
September 29, 2003
#### TURNER v. GREENE

No. 567P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 753

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 March 1998.
#### § 1903.2 Applicability.

The provisions of this part apply to all Agency installations, and to all persons entering on to or when on an Agency installation. They supplement the provisions of Title 18, United States Code, relating to crimes and criminal procedures, and those provisions of State law that are federal criminal offenses by virtue of the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. 13. The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, or his or her designee, may suspend the applicability of this part, or a portion thereof, on any Agency installation, or any portion of the installation, covered under this part. Where necessary and when consistent with national security requirements notices will be posted on the affected Agency installation to indicate that the applicability of this part or a portion thereof has been suspended.

[63 FR 44786, Aug. 21, 1998, as amended at 88 FR 20762, Apr. 7, 2023]
### §302502. Certification as part of State program

Any State program approved under this subdivision shall provide a mechanism for the certification by the State Historic Preservation Officer of local governments to carry out the purposes of this division and provide for the transfer, in accordance with section 302902(c)(4) of this title, of a portion of the grants received by the States under this division, to those local governments.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3197.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302502 | 16 U.S.C. 470a(c)(1) (1st sentence). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §101(c)(1) (1st sentence), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 915; Pub. L. 91–383, §11, as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1942; Pub. L. 93–54, §1(d), July 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 139; Pub. L. 96–205, title VI, §608(a)(1), (2), Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 92; Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §201(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2991. |

Section
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 2, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-11225

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO JAVIER FUENTES-VILLARREAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-3-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Francisco Javier Fuentes-Villarreal was convicted of one

charge of illegal reentry into the United States. The district

court sentenced him to 88 months in prison and a three-year term

of supervised release. Fuentes-Villarreal argues on appeal that

the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the

indictment based on an alleged violation of his Sixth Amendment

right to a speedy trial. 
No. 03-11225

-2-

Fuentes-Villarreal has not shown that the district court

erred in denying his motion. Fuentes-Villarreal has not shown

that he is entitled to a presumption of prejudice in connection

with the delay between his indictment and prosecution, nor has he

shown actual prejudice arising from this delay. See United

States v. Serna-Villarreal, 352 F.3d 225, 230 (5th Cir. 2003),

cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 1896 (2004). Accordingly, the district

court’s denial of Fuentes-Villarreal’s motion to dismiss is

AFFIRMED.
### §1765g. Availability of reports and dispatches

The provisions of section 1764(a) of this title shall apply with respect to personnel appointed and assigned under this subchapter.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title VI, §605G, as added Pub. L. 95–501, title IV, §401(1), Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1690.)
EXHIBIT
32.B


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2008, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, John R. Sult, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Controller, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.







/s/
      John R. SultJohn
      R. SultSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)El
      Paso Natural Gas CompanyNovember
      7, 2008


















A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural Gas
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.