alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 553.42 General rules governing eligibility for interment or inurnment in Army Post Cemeteries. ( a ) Only those persons who meet the criteria of § 553.43 or are granted an exception to policy pursuant to § 553.49 may be interred in the twenty-five Army Post Cemeteries. Only those persons who meet the criteria of § 553.44 or are granted an exception to policy pursuant to § 553.49 may be interred or inurned in the West Point Cemetery. Only those persons who meet the criteria of § 553.45 may be interred in the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks Cemetery.
( b ) Derivative eligibility for interment or inurnment may be established only through a decedent's connection to a primarily eligible person and not to another derivatively eligible person.
( c ) No veteran is eligible for interment, inurnment, or memorialization in an Army Post Cemetery (except for the U.S. Disciplinary Cemetery) unless the veteran's last period of active duty ended with an honorable discharge. A general discharge under honorable conditions is not sufficient for interment, inurnment or memorialization in an Army Post Cemetery.
( d ) For purposes of determining whether a service member has received an honorable discharge, final determinations regarding discharges made in accordance with procedures established by chapter 79 of title 10, United States Code, will be considered authoritative.
( e ) The Executive Director has the authority to act on requests for exceptions to the provisions of the interment, inurnment, and memorialization eligibility policies contained in this subpart. The Executive Director may delegate this authority on such terms deemed appropriate.
( f ) Individuals who do not qualify as a primarily eligible person or a derivatively eligible person, but who are granted an exception to policy to be interred or inurned pursuant to § 553.49 in a new gravesite or niche, will be treated as a primarily eligible person for purposes of this subpart.
( g ) Notwithstanding any other section in this subpart, memorialization with an individual memorial marker, interment, or inurnment in an Army Post Cemetery is prohibited if there is a gravesite, niche, or individual memorial marker for the decedent in any other Government-operated cemetery or the Government has provided an individual grave marker, individual memorial marker or niche cover for placement in a private cemetery.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John McGuiness, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Appeal from an order denying application for a writ of habeas corpus. On October 18, 1949, while represented by counsel, the defendant pled guilty to robbery, third degree, and was sentenced as a second offender to Sing Sing *561Prison for a term of 19-20 years. Prior to the sentence, he was charged by information with being a second offender and acknowledged through his attorney and himself that he was the same person as mentioned in the information and accordingly guilty. Upon an arraignment, pursuant to section 1943 of the Penal Law, the only issue to be determined is that of identity. After his plea herein and before sentence a colloquy took place between the court, defendant and his attorney, the reading of which leads to the inevitable conclusion that the defendant was well aware of the criminal procedure and what took place on this particular occasion. The Attorney-General raised among other defenses that the issue had been previously decided by the Bronx County Court. It is not necessary to reach that issue as we conclude the defendant was not entitled to the benefits of habeas corpus. We have determined prior hereto that failure to specifically follow the statute (§ 1943) is not a jurisdictional defect or a constitutional deprivation and that habeas corpus is not the proper remedy. *(People ex rel. Zindelka*v. *McMann,*8 A D 2d 646, motion for leave to appeal denied 7 N Y 2d 706.) Order unanimously affirmed.
#### § 37.310 When would I use an expenditure-based TIA?

In general, you must use an expenditure-based TIA under conditions other than those described in § 37.305. Reasons for any exceptions to this general rule must be documented in the award file and must be consistent with the policy in § 37.230 that precludes payment of fee or profit to participants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          51,341
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,312,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (146,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,163,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,133,290
<PP&E>                                       2,691,135
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,304,686)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,596,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,884,425
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       189,970
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,106,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,596,699
<SALES>                                     20,472,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,472,420
<CGS>                                       16,645,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,645,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,394,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             502,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (70,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (70,422)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (70,422)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.06)
        

</TABLE>
§ 845.12 When penalty will be assessed. ( a ) The Office shall assess a penalty for each cessation order.
( b ) The Office shall assess a penalty for each notice of violation, if the violation is assigned 31 points or more under the point system described in 30 CFR 845.13.
( c ) The Office may assess a penalty for each notice of violation assigned 30 points or less under the point system described in 30 CFR 845.13. In determining whether to assess a penalty, the Office shall consider the factors listed in 30 CFR 845.13(b).
#### McAULIFFE v. PRECISION DENTAL LAB

No. 6P98

Case below: 128 N.C.App. 185

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1439 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1439

    Expressing support for the recognition of September 7, 2024, as 
 ``Liturgical Dance Day'' and the International Dance Commission, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2024

   Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Carter of Louisiana, Ms. 
     Wilson of Florida, and Mr. Thanedar) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for the recognition of September 7, 2024, as 
 ``Liturgical Dance Day'' and the International Dance Commission, and 
                          for other purposes.

Whereas, on September 7, 2024, the International Dance Commission will celebrate 
        ``Liturgical Dance Day'' as dancers from around the world will take part 
        in a day of fasting, prayer, and worship;
Whereas, every Sunday morning, liturgical dance is expressed in thousands of 
        ministries across the Nation, and liturgical dance ministers provide 
        valuable outreach programs serving inner-city youth and instilling them 
        with discipline, the desire to pursue excellence, and a love of dance;
Whereas the International Dance Commission's purpose is to serve as a 
        multicultural umbrella organization and resource pool for dance, worship 
        arts ministries, and dance companies throughout the world; and
Whereas the members of the International Dance Commission dedicate themselves to 
        service in their communities, sharing their gifts through the creative 
        arts: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes ``Liturgical 
Dance Day'' and the International Dance Commission and its 
contributions to the creative arts and worship in communities across 
the State of Georgia.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joseph Zbetovsky, plaintiff in error, v. Anton Doupnik, defendant in error.

Gen. No. 28,353.

Motion to set aside dismissal of cause and judgment for costs. Motion denied. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Carlton S. Badger, for plaintiff in error.

Stanley Vesely, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §2108a. Treatment of certain individuals as veterans, disabled veterans, and preference eligibles

(a) Veteran.—

(1) In general.—Except as provided under paragraph (3),1 an individual shall be treated as a veteran defined under section 2108(1) for purposes of making an appointment in the competitive service, if the individual—

(A) meets the definition of a veteran under section 2108(1), except for the requirement that the individual has been discharged or released from active duty in the armed forces under honorable conditions; and

(B) submits a certification described under paragraph (2) to the Federal officer making the appointment.

(2) Certification.—A certification referred to under paragraph (1) is a certification that the individual is expected to be discharged or released from active duty in the armed forces under honorable conditions not later than 120 days after the date of the submission of the certification.

(b) Disabled Veteran.—

(1) In general.—Except as provided under paragraph (3),1 an individual shall be treated as a disabled veteran defined under section 2108(2) for purposes of making an appointment in the competitive service, if the individual—

(A) meets the definition of a disabled veteran under section 2108(2), except for the requirement that the individual has been separated from active duty in the armed forces under honorable conditions; and

(B) submits a certification described under paragraph (2) to the Federal officer making the appointment.

(2) Certification.—A certification referred to under paragraph (1) is a certification that the individual is expected to be separated from active duty in the armed forces under honorable conditions not later than 120 days after the date of the submission of the certification.

(c) Preference Eligible.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply with respect to determining whether an individual is a preference eligible under section 2108(3) for purposes of making an appointment in the competitive service.

(Added Pub. L. 112–56, title II, §235(a)(1), Nov. 21, 2011, 125 Stat. 722.)

1 So in original. Subsec. does not contain a par. (3).
Appeal No. 76-198.

#### John Feole *v.*Hart Engineering Company.

*Rudolph E. Boffi,*for petitioner.

*Charles H. Anderson,*for respondent.

This case is assigned to the calendar for May 2, 1977, 9:30 a.m., for oral argument. Petitioner will be expected to *show cause*why the decree of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission should not be sustained in light of this court’s rule that where there is any legal evidence upon which the commission’s decree could reasonably be based, its findings 'are conclusive in the absence of fraud and cannot be disturbed. *Auclair*v. *American Silk Spinning Co.,*109 R.I. 395, 286 A.2d 253 (1972).
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Harold W. Ingalls, certify that

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Serologicals Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 18, 2005

|/s/HAROLD W. INGALLSHarold W. Ingalls
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1454 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1454

 Censuring Representatives Bennie Thompson, Troy Carter, Barbara Lee, 
    Frederica Wilson, Yvette Clarke, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Jasmine 
    Crockett, Joyce Beatty, and Steve Cohen for inciting violence, 
 including two assassination attempts, against President Donald Trump.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2024

  Ms. Greene of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was 
                  referred to the Committee on Ethics

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Censuring Representatives Bennie Thompson, Troy Carter, Barbara Lee, 
    Frederica Wilson, Yvette Clarke, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Jasmine 
    Crockett, Joyce Beatty, and Steve Cohen for inciting violence, 
 including two assassination attempts, against President Donald Trump.

Whereas Representative Bennie Thompson has introduced H. R. 8081, the DISGRACED 
        Former Protectees Act, targeting President Donald J. Trump by attempting 
        to remove his United States Secret Service protection, which is granted 
        to all former presidents;
Whereas Representatives Troy Carter, Barbara Lee, Frederica Wilson, Yvette 
        Clarke, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Jasmine Crockett, Joyce Beatty, and Steve 
        Cohen are cosponsors of the bill;
Whereas a staffer of Representative Bennie Thompson said after the first 
        assassination attempt on President Trump, ``I don't condone violence but 
        please get you some shooting lessons so you don't miss next time . . . 
        oops that wasn't me talking.'';
Whereas Representative Jasmine Crockett lashed out in a recent interview, just 
        hours before the second assassination attempt on President Trump, 
        saying, ``MAGA in general--they are threats to us domestically.'';
Whereas Representative Steve Cohen said, ``Trump is an enemy of the United 
        States.''; and
Whereas Representative Joyce Beatty said President Trump ``stepped on our 
        democracy. He defied the Constitution.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the House of Representatives censures Representatives 
        Bennie Thompson, Troy Carter, Barbara Lee, Frederica Wilson, 
        Yvette Clark, Bonnie Coleman, Jasmine Crockett, Joyce Beatty, 
        and Steve Cohen, for inciting violence, including two 
        assassination attempts, against President Donald Trump;
            (2) these Representatives will forthwith present themselves 
        in the well of the House of Representatives for the 
        pronouncement of censure; and
            (3) these Representatives will be censured with the public 
        reading of this resolution by the Speaker.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000315374
<NAME>                                       DAWN HIATT                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                    US DOLLARS 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,877
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                   785
<INVENTORY>                                    24,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               44,108
<PP&E>                                         21,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 59,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,336
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       653
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,488
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   59,750
<SALES>                                        99,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               99,351
<CGS>                                          92,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  92,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (491)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                   94
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,264
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .72
        







  

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              78
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         77
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,442
<PP&E>                                           6,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,050
<BONDS>                                          2,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,810
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    168
<INCOME-TAX>                                        65
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 91
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        91
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald E. De Groat, Appellant.

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted. The appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief. Application in all other respects denied. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
### §1728. Findings regarding emergency food assistance

The Congress finds that—

(1) acute food crises continue to cause loss of life, severe malnutrition, and general human suffering in many areas of the Third World, especially in sub-Saharan Africa;

(2) the United States continues to respond to these needs, as a reflection of its humanitarian concern for the people of the Third World, with emergency food and other necessary assistance to alleviate the suffering of those affected by severe food shortages;

(3) the timely provision of food and other necessary assistance to those in need is of paramount importance if the worst effects of such food crises are to be mitigated; and

(4) the ability of the United States to provide food and other necessary assistance on a timely basis, and to ensure that such assistance is distributed to those in need, should be enhanced in order to better enable the United States to help those affected by severe food shortages.

(Pub. L. 98–473, title III, §302, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2194.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the President's Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1984, and not as part of the Food for Peace Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 98–473, title III, §301, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2194, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter and amending section 1723 of this title] may be cited as the 'President's Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1984'."