alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C-TP-77-002 COMMENT 04

[3128-01] 

Title 10-Energy 

CHAPTER II-FEDERAi. ENERGY 

ADMINISTRATION 1 

PART 430-ENERGY CONSERVATION 

PROGRAM FOR APPLIANCES 

Indefinite Suspension of Final Test 

Procedures for Water Heaters 

AGENCY: Department of Energy, 

ACTION: Suspension of final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Energy, by separate notice issued 

today, is proposing an amendment to 

its test procedures for water heaters, 

10 CFR Part 430, Subpart B. Pending 

the hearing on this proposal and prescription of the final rule, the provisions of 10 CFR 430.22(e)(2) are 

hereby suspended. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 29, 1978. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 

CONTACT: 

James A. Smith, <Office of Conservation and Solar Applications), Old 

Post Office Building, Room 307, 

l EDITORIAL NOTE: It Is contemplated that 

Chapter II will be renamed at a future date 

to reflect the fact that it contains regulations administered by the Department of 

Energy, including regulations administered 

by the Office of Conservation and Solar Ap- plications. 

13865 

12th Street and Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 

20461, 202-566-4635. 

William J. Dennison, (Office of the 

General Counsel), 12th Street and 

Pennsylvania Avenue 1'1"'W., Room 

7148, Washington, D.C. 20461, 202-

566-9750. 

SuPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

10 CFR 430.22(e)(2) is hereby suspended until further notice. 

Issued in Wa.shin.gton, D.C., March 

29, 1978. 

WILLIAM S. HEFFELFINGER, 

Director of Administration. 

CFR Doc. 78-8659 Filed 3-31-78; 8:45 amJ 

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 43, NO. 64-MONDAY, APRIL 3, 1978
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,208
<PP&E>                                          52,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           845
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,321
<SALES>                                          9,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,888
<CGS>                                            5,958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,310
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,310
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,310
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15


</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A1 00 5 . FI REMAN’S FUND I NSURANCE COMPANY v . DEVI LLE.

W e g ran t ed Fi rem an ’ s Fu n d In s u ran ce Co m p an y ’ s a pplic a tion f

or i nte r loc utor

y

rev i ew o f t h e St at e Co u rt o f Fu l t o n Co u n t y ’ s o rd er d en y i n g it s m o t i o n fo r s u m m ary ju d g m en t

. Aft er rev i ewi n g t h e reco rd i n i t s en t i ret y , we fi n d t h at ju di ci al eco n o m y i s n ot

s erv ed by g ran t in g t h e ap p l i cat i o n

. Acco rd i n g l y , t h e o rd er g ran t i n g Fi rem an ’ s Fu n d

In s u ran ce Co m

p an y ’ s ap p l icat i o n fo r i n t erl ocu t o ry ap p eal i s v acat ed

, an d i t s ap p eal

i s d i s m i s s ed as i m

p ro v i d en t ly g ran t ed

. See J.S

. Jo n es Co n s t r. Co

. v. Mo o r e , 1 3 8 Ga.
Ap p . 2 6 0 , 2 6 0 (2 2 6 SE2 d 1 0 0 ) (1 9 7 6 ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 07/27/2016 July 27, 2016
EXHIBIT 32.1

ALTERA CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Altera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Daane, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 25, 2009



/s/ JOHN DAANEJohn Daane Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altera Corporation and will be retained by
Altera Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                          27,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  217,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    102,589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               369,522
<PP&E>                                         108,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 487,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          216,801
<BONDS>                                         39,857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           310
<OTHER-SE>                                     225,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   487,856
<SALES>                                      1,058,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,058,553
<CGS>                                          791,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  791,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               339,044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,262)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (16,449)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (35,052)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,052)<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)
<FN>
<F1>The Company recognized minority interest expense in the amount of $2,239,000 in
the consolidated statement of operations, which represents the minority
shareholder portion of the income for less than wholly-owned subsidiaries.  The
minority interest share of the net assets of these subsidiaries of $5,244,000
as of May 1, 1999 is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheet of the Company.
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 1901.22 Action and determination(s) by originator(s) or any interested party. ( a ) *Initial action for access.* CIA components tasked pursuant to a Privacy Act access request shall search all relevant record systems within their cognizance. They shall: ( 1 ) Determine whether responsive records exist;
( 2 ) Determine whether access must be denied in whole or part and on what legal basis under both Acts in each such case;
( 3 ) Approve the disclosure of records for which they are the originator; and
( 4 ) Forward to the Coordinator all records approved for release or necessary for coordination with or referral to another originator or interested party as well as the specific determinations with respect to denials (if any).
( b ) *Initial action for amendment.* CIA components tasked pursuant to a Privacy Act amendment request shall review the official records alleged to be inaccurate and the proposed amendment submitted by the requester. If they determine that the Agency's records are not accurate, relevant, timely or complete, they shall promptly: ( 1 ) Make the amendment as requested;
( 2 ) Write to all other identified persons or agencies to whom the record has been disclosed (if an accounting of the disclosure was made) and inform of the amendment; and
( 3 ) Inform the Coordinator of such decisions.
( c ) *Action otherwise on amendment request.* If the CIA component records manager declines to make the requested amendment or declines to make the requested amendment but agrees to augment the official records, that manager shall promptly: ( 1 ) Set forth the reasons for refusal; and
( 2 ) Inform the Coordinator of such decision and the reasons therefore.
( d ) *Referrals and coordinations.* As applicable and within ten (10) days of receipt by the Coordinator, any CIA records containing information originated by other CIA components shall be forwarded to those entities for action in accordance with paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) of this section and return. Records originated by other federal agencies or CIA records containing other federal agency information shall be forwarded to such agencies within ten (10) days of our completion of initial action in the case for action under their regulations and direct response to the requester (for other agency records) or return to the CIA (for CIA records).
( e ) *Effect of certain exemptions.* This section shall not be construed to allow access to systems of records exempted by the Director of Central Intelligence pursuant to subsections (j) and (k) of the Privacy Act or where those exemptions require that the CIA can neither confirm nor deny the existence or nonexistence of responsive records.
##### 



Exhibit 21- Subsidiaries of the Company as of November 1, 2004  Parent Level:
    R.H. Donnelley Corporation (formerly known as The Dun &
Bradstreet Corporation), a Delaware corporation; publicly traded on NYSE
as RHD Tier 1 Subsidiary:
    
    R.H. Donnelley Inc. (formerly known as The
Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation), a Delaware corporation wholly
owned by R.H. Donnelley Corporation
  Tier 2 Subsidiaries (all 100% owned by R.H. Donnelley Inc.):  DonTech Holdings, LLC*
Get Digital Smart.com Inc.**
R.H. Donnelley APIL, Inc**
R.H. Donnelley Publishing & Advertising, Inc.***
R.H. Donnelley Publishing & Advertising of Illinois Holdings, LLC*Tier 3 Subsidiaries (both 100% owned by R.H.
Donnelley Inc. and a Tier 2 subsidiary):  The DonTech II Partnership****
R.H. Donnelley Publishing & Advertising of
Illinois Partnership****   *
    
    Delaware limited liability companies**
    
    Delaware corporations. Get Digital Smart is presently inactive.***
    
    Kansas corporation formerly known as Sprint Publishing & Advertising,
Inc., which now does business as R.H. Donnelley Publishing & Advertising
and Sprint Yellow Pages®.****
    
    Illinois general partnerships doing business as DonTech and R.H.
Donnelley Publishing & Advertising, respectively
 77
Exhibit 13.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Tal Raz, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

 

 

| Date:          July 13, 2005 |   |   |                                                                   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   |   |      /s/ Tal Raz                              |
|                         |   |   |  

 

 

Tal RazChief Financial Officer

 

  |
Exhibit 32.1

EAGLE EXPLORATION COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Raymond N. Joeckel, the President and Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Exploration Company, (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 12, 2008



/s/ Raymond N. JoeckelName: Raymond N. JoeckelTitle: President and Chief Financial Officer
### Gischia, Scott

From:

Sent:

To: Cc:

Subject: Beth Havlik [ bhavlik@barr.com ]

Wednesday, January 10, 2007 

### 1:56 PM

Gischia, Scott

George Pruchnofski

SO2 Scrubber Costs

We looked into the question from MCPA inquiring about the SO 2 scrubber calculations, specifically referring to the "SO 2

Scrubber Scale" sheet. The calculations in the "SO 2 Scrubber Scale" sheet take a vendor quotation for SO 2 scrubber

equipment and scales the costs for each stack based on the specific scrubber flue gas flow rate. The SO 2 scrubber

equipment costs are then used to calculate the installed capital costs for the SO 2 scrubbers.

MPCA's question pertained to the use of a 15% increase in the actual flue gas flow rate (to represent maximum flue gas

flow rate f or design cost estimate purposes) and the division of the flow rate by 0.85 in the scaling calculation. They

asked if this factor was "double counted." Barr has reviewed the calculations and our supporting documentation and we

have concluded that we did do uble count the 15% by mistake.

Barr has recalculated the costs removing the double

- counting. The results for your facility are summarized in the table

below. As illustrated in the table, the change in the calculations decreases the pollution control cost ( $/ton) by

approximately 5%. This change would have no impact on the conclusions of the report.

Furnace 11 Hood Exhaust 

### Pollution Control Cost ($/ton

Difference Previous Cost Corrected

Cost

$139,872 $132,924 5.0%

Furnace 11 Waste Gas $384,034 $365,347 4.9%

Furnace 12 Hood Exhaust $152,149 $144,592 5.0%

Furnace 12 Waste Gas 

### $417,742 $397,415 4.9%

We apologize for this mistake. We verified that this only affects the SO 2 scrubber calculations and no other control

equipment.

Please call me if you have any additional questions or comments as MPCA continues its review.

Beth T. Havlik, P.E.

Vice President, Barr Engineering

4700 West 77th Street

Minneapolis, MN 55435

- 4803

800/632

- 2277 toll free

952/832

- 2640 phone

952/832

- 2601 fax

734/255

- 0269 mobile



### bhavlikbarr.com

1
Exhibit 10.6.1


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated as of January 28, 2005 between ETS Payphones, Inc. (the “Company”) and
Jeffrey E. Fennell (the “Executive”) is made effective April 1, 2006.


 


Whereas in consideration of the mutual agreements contained herein, and
for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that Section  4(c) of the
Agreement is hereby amended to delete “...and shall continue medical insurance
for the Executive and his dependents on the same terms as exist on the date of
termination for a period of one (1) year. After that one year period, Executive
shall be entitled to elect eighteen months of continuation coverage under COBRA”.
Such language shall be replaced by the following: “...and shall receive monthly
payments of  one thousand, five hundred
and sixty dollars and seventy-three cents ($1,560.73) less applicable state and
federal individual taxes as well as any taxes required to be paid by the
Company in respect of such payment for a period of one (1) year. Executive
agrees to waive election of continuation of coverage for the Executive and his
dependents under COBRA under the Company’s medical insurance plan now and
forever more.”


 


All other provisions of the Agreement not specifically amended by this
Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. All capitalized but undefined
terms used herein shall the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement. This
Amendment may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts each of
which shall be deemed one and the same agreement. A photocopy or facsimile
reproduction of this Amendment and any signatures shall be deemed as effective
as the original.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have each executed
and delivered this Amendment as of the date first shown above.


 


	
   

  	
  COMPANY

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/  MICHAEL
  H. MCCLELLAN

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  March 29, 2006

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ JEFFREY E. FENNELL

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  March 29, 2006
§ 1901.21 Processing requests for access to or amendment of records. ( a ) *In general.* Requests meeting the requirements of 32 CFR 1901.11 through 1901.13 shall be processed under both the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and the applicable regulations, unless the requester demands otherwise in writing. Such requests will be processed under both Acts regardless of whether the requester cites one Act in the request, both, or neither. This action is taken in order to ensure the maximum possible disclosure to the requester.
( b ) *Receipt, recording and tasking.* Upon receipt of a request meeting the requirements of §§ 1901.11 through 1901.13, the Agency shall within ten (10) days record each request, acknowledge receipt to the requester, and thereafter effect the necessary taskings to the components reasonably believed to hold responsive records.
( c ) *Effect of certain exemptions.* In processing a request, the Agency shall decline to confirm or deny the existence or nonexistence of any responsive records whenever the fact of their existence or nonexistence is itself classified under Executive Order 12958 or revealing of intelligence sources and methods protected pursuant to section 103(c)(5) of the National Security Act of 1947. In such circumstances, the Agency, in the form of a final written response, shall so inform the requester and advise of his or her right to an administrative appeal.
( d ) *Time for response.* Although the Privacy Act does not mandate a time for response, our joint treatment of requests under both the Privacy Act and the FOIA means that the Agency should provide a response within the FOIA statutory guideline of ten (10) days on initial requests and twenty (20) days on administrative appeals. However, the current volume of requests require that the Agency often seek additional time from a requester pursuant to 32 CFR 1901.33. In such event, the Agency will inform the requester in writing and further advise of his or her right to file an administrative appeal.
April 28, 1977.

M. P. No. 77-43.

#### Gertrude M. Jayne Fowler *v.*Title Investment Co. of America.

This matter comes before the court on defendant’s motion to vacate the stay granted by this court on February 24, 1977 for failure of the plaintiff to post the bond required in that order, and on plaintiff’s motion to vacate that portion of the order requiring a bond.

The defendant’s motion to vacate the stay is denied. The plaintiff’s motion .to vacate that portion of the order, requiring *928the bond is granted, on condition that the plaintiff present evidence to this court that the defendant has been added as loss payee on plaintiff’s fire insurance policy on the real estate which is the subject of defendant’s mortgage.

*Gertrude M. Jayne Fowler,*pro se, for plaintiff.

*John E. Martinelli,*for defendant.

This case is assigned to the calendar for October, 1977 for oral argument.