alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4558-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of California (FEMA-4558-DR), dated August 22, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued September 10, 2020.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of California is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 22, 2020.

Butte, Plumas, and Yuba Counties for emergency protective measures (Category B), including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2020-28724 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Constance Plaines et al., Appellants, v. Evelyn Jones, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, 'made October 23, 1963, which granted the motion of the defendant Jones to dismiss the complaint as against her for lack of prosecution. The record fails to contain the order of October 23, 1963 appealed *from.*It does contain, however, an order of said court, dated November 15, 1963, granting the motion to dismiss the complaint. It appears from the record and briefs that such order was made upon the granting of reargument, although the order itself does not so indicate. Such order has been reviewed on the court’s own motion, pursuant to statute (former Civ. Prac. Act, § 562-a, now CPLR 5517). Order of November 15, 1963, made on reargument, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appeal from order of October 23, 1963 dismissed as academic. That order in any event was superseded by the later order of November 15, 1963. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### § 37.1335 Program income.

Gross income earned by the recipient or a participant that is generated by a supported activity or earned as a direct result of a TIA. Program income includes but is not limited to: income from fees for performing services; the use or rental of real property, equipment, or supplies acquired under a TIA; the sale of commodities or items fabricated under a TIA; and license fees and royalties on patents and copyrights. Interest earned on advances of Federal funds is not program income.
§ 37.670 Must I require participants to flow down audit requirements to subrecipients? ( a ) Yes, in accordance with § 37.610, your expenditure-based TIA must require participants to flow down the same audit requirements to a subrecipient that would apply if the subrecipient were a participant.
( b ) For example, a for-profit participant that is audited by the DCAA: ( 1 ) Would flow down to a university subrecipient the Single Audit Act requirements that apply to a university participant.
( 2 ) Could enter into a subaward allowing a for-profit participant, under the circumstances described in § 37.650(a), to use an IPA to do its audits.
( c ) This policy applies to subawards for substantive performance of portions of the research project supported by the TIA, and not to participants' purchases of goods or services needed to carry out the research.
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## November 5, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r 

## 136056 & (43) Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,
J ustices 

## Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136056 COA: 282662 Berrien CC: 2007-411918-FH JOSEPH ALLEN TRAPP, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

By order of June 11, 2008, we remande d this case to the Court of Appeals and retained jurisdiction. On order of the Court, the Court of Appeals having issued its decision on remand on September 9, 2008, the application for leave to appeal is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we ar e not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be revi ewed by this Court.

d1029 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 5, 2008

Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent-Appellant, v. Jerome Dooling, Appellant-Respondent.

Judgment of conviction and order unanimously affirmed. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of (1) manslaughter, second degree, (2) failure to furnish food, shelter and medical attendance to minors and (3) endangering health of *755infants; also appeal by the People from an order, entered on the minutes, dismissing the first count of the indictment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern, and Henry, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER III—REINSTATEMENT OR RESTORATION AFTER SUSPENSION OR REMOVAL FOR NATIONAL SECURITY
### §1387. Photographic reproductions and maps

The Secretary may furnish reproductions of information such as geo-referenced data from all sources, aerial or other photographs, mosaics, and maps as have been obtained in connection with the authorized work of the Department to farmers and governmental agencies at the estimated cost of furnishing such reproductions, and to persons other than farmers at such prices as the Secretary may determine (but not less than the estimated costs of data processing, updating, revising, reformatting, repackaging and furnishing the reproductions and information), the money received from such sales to be deposited in the Treasury to the credit of the appropriation charged with the cost of making such reproductions. This section shall not affect the power of the Secretary to make other disposition of such or similar materials under any other provisions of existing law.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §387, 52 Stat. 68; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(3) [title IV, §407], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–214.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–113 substituted "information such as geo-referenced data from all sources, aerial" for "such aerial", struck out "(not less than estimated cost of furnishing such reproductions)" after "such prices", and inserted "(but not less than the estimated costs of data processing, updating, revising, reformatting, repackaging and furnishing the reproductions and information)" after "determine".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wool Support Program

Wool support program, application of this section to, see note set out under section 713a–8 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
### §1359hh. Regulations; violations; publication of Secretary's determinations; jurisdiction of the courts; United States attorneys

#### (a) Regulations

The Secretary or the Commodity Credit Corporation, as appropriate, shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the authority vested in the Secretary in administering this subpart.

#### (b) Violation

Any person knowingly violating any regulation of the Secretary issued under subsection (a) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each violation.

#### (c) Publication in Federal Register

Each determination issued by the Secretary to establish, adjust, or suspend allotments under this subpart shall be promptly published in the Federal Register and shall be accompanied by a statement of the reasons for the determination.

#### (d) Jurisdiction of courts; United States attorneys

#### (1) Jurisdiction of courts

The several district courts of the United States are vested with jurisdiction specifically to enforce, and to prevent and restrain any person from violating, this subpart or any regulation issued thereunder.

#### (2) United States attorneys

Whenever the Secretary shall so request, it shall be the duty of the several United States attorneys, in their respective districts, to institute proceedings to enforce the remedies and to collect the penalties provided for in this subpart. The Secretary may elect not to refer to a United States attorney any violation of this subpart or regulation when the Secretary determines that the administration and enforcement of this subpart would be adequately served by written notice or warning to any person committing the violation.

#### (e) Nonexclusivity of remedies

The remedies and penalties provided for in this subpart shall be in addition to, and not exclusive of, any remedies or penalties existing at law or in equity.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §359h, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1403, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 202.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1359hh, act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §359h, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title IX, §902, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3486; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title I, §111(j), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1836, related to regulations, violations, publication of Secretary's determinations, jurisdiction of courts, and United States attorneys, prior to the general amendment of this subpart by Pub. L. 107–171.
# C_2008197EN.01003503.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/35

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 June 2008 — Martins v Commission

(Case T-11/04) (1)

1

(2008/C 197/62)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 6.3.2004.

1

---
#### BOYD v. UNITED STATES MORTGAGE & TRUST CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Julia S. Boyd against the United States Mortgage & Trust Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSE SANTIAGO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 676 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### § 21.400 To what instruments does this subpart apply?

This subpart applies to grants, cooperative agreements, and technology investment agreements, which are legal instruments used to reflect assistance relationships between the United States Government and recipients.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R.H. Donnelley Inc. for the period
ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers
knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of R.H.
Donnelley, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    Steven M. BlondyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    SVP and Chief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2005
    
    May 10, 2005
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 73
### **CHAPTER 59—RURAL FIRE PROTECTION, DEVELOPMENT, AND SMALL FARM RESEARCH AND EDUCATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—RURAL COMMUNITY FIRE PROTECTION

Sec.
2651 to 2654. Repealed.
2655.
Rural firefighters and emergency medical service assistance program.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND SMALL FARM RESEARCH AND EDUCATION

2661.
Statement of purposes and goals.
2662.
Programs authorized.
2662a.
Repealed.
2663.
Funding.
2664.
Cooperating colleges and universities.
2665.
Withholding funds.
2666.
Definitions.
2667.
Regulations.
2668.
Omitted.
2669.
Pilot projects for production and marketing of industrial hydrocarbons and alcohols from agricultural commodities and forest products.
2670.
Repealed.
2671.
Establishment of technical assistance program.
----

----

|                                           | DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYINTERNAL REVENUE SERVICEWASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| TAX EXEMPT ANDGOVERNMENT ENTITIESDIVISION |                                                                     |

| PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO OF AMERICA 200 WOOD AVENUE EASTISELIN, NJ 08830Dear Applicant: | Contact Person:Janell Hayes/Letitia Young Telephone Number:513-263-3602/513-263-3584 In Reference To:TEGE: EP: 7521Date: 03/31/2008 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29205]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than February 5, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Mary S. Johnson, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#43002c2e2e262d37306d2233332f2a2022372a2c2d3003202f26356d2531216d2c3124"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e1d3133333b302a2d703f2e2e32373d3f2a3731302d1e3d323b2870382c3c70312c39">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 
and PNC Bancorp, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware; to acquire BBVA USA 
Bancshares, Inc., Houston, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire BBVA 
USA, Birmingham, Alabama.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 30, 
2020.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2020-29205 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
65

10. Tanks

All the tanks emit both VOM and benzene. The actual VOM emissions are those reported in 

the Annual Air Emissions Report for 2012. The VOM and benzene PTEs were calculated from 

the emission factor determined using 2012 emission rates and throughputs. The emission factor 

was then multiplied times the maximum hourly throughput to yield the potential VOM 

emissions in pounds per hour; and then converted to tons per year using 8,760 hours per year.

Tank Emissions Summary

Tank 

Number Pollutant

Actual 

Emissions 

2012 

(lb/yr)

2012 

Throughput 

(103gals/yr)

Emission 

Factor 

(lbs/103

gals)

PTE

(Lb/hr)

PTE

(Ton/yr)

Tank #2

VOM 1.58

602

0.0026 0.0052 0.0230

Benzene 0.0015 2.49E-06 4.98E-06 2.18E-05

Tank #4

VOM 1.73

602

0.0029 0.0057 0.0252

Benzene 0.017 2.82E-05 5.65E-05 2.47E-04

Tank #6

VOM 2.76

3061

0.0009 0.0018 0.0079

Benzene 0.0027 8.82E-07 1.76E-06 7.73E-06

Tank #8

VOM 2.81

2461

0.0011 0.0023 0.0100

Benzene 0.0027 1.10E-06 2.19E-06 9.61E-06

Tank #10

VOM 10.68

500

0.0214 0.0427 0.1871

Benzene 0.0104 2.08E-05 4.16E-05 1.82E-04

Tank #20

VOM 1.12

310

0.0036 0.0072 0.0316

Benzene 0.0011 3.55E-06 7.10E-06 3.11E-05

Tank #30

VOM 2.33

79

0.0295 0.0590 0.2584

Benzene 0.0023 2.91E-05 5.82E-05 2.55E-04

Tank #40

VOM 2.42

657

0.0037 0.0074 0.0323

Benzene 0.0023 3.50E-06 7.00E-06 3.07E-05

Tank #50

VOM 0.7650

764

0.0010 0.0020 0.0088

Benzene 0.0007 9.46E-07 1.83E-06 8.03E-06

Tank #60

VOM 5.55

950

0.0058 0.0117 0.0512

Benzene 0.0054 5.68E-06 1.14E-05 4.98E-05

Tank #300

VOM 1.90

580

0.0033 0.0066 0.0287

Benzene 0.0018 3.10E-06 6.21E-06 2.71E -05

Tank #302

VOM 11.74

543

0.0216 0.0432 0.1894

Benzene 0.0114 2.10E-05 4.20E-05 1.84E-04

Tank #304

VOM 2.81

434

0.0065 0.0130 0.0567

Benzene 0.0027 6.22E-06 1.24E-05 5.45E-05

Tank #306

VOM 5.28

466

0.0113 0.0227 0.0993

Benzene 0.0051 1.09E-05 2.19E-05 9.59E-05

Tank #308

VOM 8.99

355

0.0253 0.0506 0.2218

Benzene 0.0087 2.45E-05 4.90E-05 2.15E-04

Tank #310 VOM 8.27 282 0.0293 0.0587 0.2569
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-41213

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERRANCE LAMAR WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:96-Cr-9-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terrance Lamar Williams pleaded guilty to aiding and

abetting the possession of cocaine base with intent to

distribute. Williams argues on appeal that the Government

breached his plea agreement by failing to move for a downward

departure at sentencing pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K.1.1. We have

reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and find no

breach of the plea agreement. United States v. Cerverizzo, 74
No.

- 2 -

F.3d 629, 632 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.
§ 922.843 Federal enforcement. ( a ) Part 843 of this chapter, *Federal Enforcement,* shall apply when enforcement action is required for violations on surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) The Office will furnish a copy of each enforcement action document and order to show cause issued pursuant to this subpart to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey Division upon request.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARVINDER KAUR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73009

Agency No. A095-576-861

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Parvinder Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum and

FILED

SEP 30 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-73009

withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny

the petition for review.

The BIA adopted and affirmed the IJ’s decision including the IJ’s adverse

credibility determination. See Abebe v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 1037, 1040 (9th Cir.

2005) (en banc) (where the BIA cites its decision in Matter of Burbano, 20 I. & N.

Dec. 872 (BIA 1994), and does not express any disagreement with any part of the

IJ’s decision, the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision in its entirety).

In her opening brief, Kaur fails to raise any challenge to the agency’s

dispositive adverse credibility determination. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94

F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued are

deemed waived). Accordingly, Kaur’s asylum and withholding of removal claims

fail.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.