alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Geology of the Apollo 16 area, Central Lunar Highlands

By: Carroll Ann HodgesWilliam R. Muehlberger

Edited by: George E. Ulrich

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1048

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Coal resource occurrence and coal development potential maps of the Gould NW Quadrangle, Jackson County, Colorado(1979)                                    

                                        Geologic map of the Apollo 16 landing site and vicinity(1979)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### Part C—Studies
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of UQM Technologies,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended March31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in thereport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in theReport.

| /s/  William G. Rankin 
William G. Rankin 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/  Donald A. French 
Donald A. French 
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 21, 2008

 

 

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Changes in Cost of Living In Large Cities In the United States, 1913-41

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Changes in Cost of Living In Large Cities In the United States, 1913-41 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 699*,												Washington, D.C.: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1941,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/315,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 37.865 Should my patent provision include march-in rights?

Your TIA's patent rights provision should include the Bayh-Dole march-in rights clause at paragraph (j)(1) of 37 CFR 401.14, or an equivalent clause, concerning actions that the Government may take to obtain the right to use subject inventions, if the recipient fails to take effective steps to achieve practical application of the subject inventions within a reasonable time. The march-in provision may be modified to best meet the needs of the program. However, only infrequently should the march-in provision be entirely removed (*e.g.,* you may wish to do so if a recipient is providing most of the funding for a research project, with the Government providing a much smaller share).
### §677b. Declaration

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Declaration

The Secretary, in consultation with the National Cyber Director, may make a declaration of a significant incident in accordance with this section for the purpose of enabling the activities described in this part if the Secretary determines that—

(A) a specific significant incident—

(i) has occurred; or

(ii) is likely to occur imminently; and

(B) otherwise available resources, other than the Fund, are likely insufficient to respond effectively to, or to mitigate effectively, the specific significant incident described in subparagraph (A).

#### (2) Prohibition on delegation

The Secretary may not delegate the authority provided to the Secretary under paragraph (1).

#### (b) Asset response activities

Upon a declaration, the Director shall coordinate—

(1) the asset response activities of each Federal agency in response to the specific significant incident associated with the declaration; and

(2) with appropriate entities, which may include—

(A) public and private entities and State and local governments with respect to the asset response activities of those entities and governments; and

(B) Federal, State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies with respect to investigations and threat response activities of those law enforcement agencies; and

(3) Federal, State, local, and Tribal emergency management and response agencies.

#### (c) Duration

Subject to subsection (d), a declaration shall terminate upon the earlier of—

(1) a determination by the Secretary that the declaration is no longer necessary; or

(2) the expiration of the 120-day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary makes the declaration.

#### (d) Renewal

The Secretary, without delegation, may renew a declaration as necessary.

#### (e) Publication

#### (1) In general

Not later than 72 hours after a declaration or a renewal, the Secretary shall publish the declaration or renewal in the Federal Register.

#### (2) Prohibition

A declaration or renewal published under paragraph (1) may not include the name of any affected individual or private company.

#### (f) Advance actions

#### (1) In general

The Secretary—

(A) shall assess the resources available to respond to a potential declaration; and

(B) may take actions before and while a declaration is in effect to arrange or procure additional resources for asset response activities or technical assistance the Secretary determines necessary, which may include entering into standby contracts with private entities for cybersecurity services or incident responders in the event of a declaration.

#### (2) Expenditure of funds

Any expenditure from the Fund for the purpose of paragraph (1)(B) shall be made from amounts available in the Fund, and amounts available in the Fund shall be in addition to any other appropriations available to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency for such purpose.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XXII, §2233, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. G, title VI, §70602(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1268.)
§ 1701.12 ODNI responsibility for responding to requests for accounting. ( a ) *Acknowledgement of request.* Upon receipt of a request for accounting, the D/IMO shall acknowledge receipt of the request in writing and provide an assigned request number for further reference.
( b ) *Tasking of component.* Upon receipt of a request for accounting, the D/IMO shall forward the request to the POC in the component maintaining the record. The POC shall work with the component's information management officer and the systems administrator to generate the requested disclosure history.
( c ) *Action on request for accounting.* The D/IMO will notify the requester when the accounting is available for on-site review or transmission in paper or electronic medium.
( d ) *Notice of court-ordered disclosures.* The D/IMO shall make reasonable efforts to notify an individual whose record is disclosed pursuant to court order. Notice shall be made within a reasonable time after receipt of the order; however, when the order is not a matter of public record, the notice shall be made only after the order becomes public. Notice shall be sent to the individual's last known address and include a copy of the order and a description of the information disclosed. No notice shall be made regarding records disclosed from a criminal law enforcement system that has been exempted from the notice requirement.
( e ) *Notice of emergency disclosures.* ODNI shall notify an individual whose record it discloses under compelling circumstances affecting health or safety. This notice shall be mailed to the individual's last known address and shall state the nature of the information disclosed; the person, organization, or agency to which it was disclosed; the date of disclosure; and the compelling circumstances justifying the disclosure. This provision shall not apply in circumstances involving classified records that have been exempted from disclosure pursuant to subsection (j) or (k) of the Privacy Act.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Paul M. Joeckel, the Secretary and Vice President Operations of Eagle Exploration Company, (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 10, 2006



/s/ Paul M. JoeckelName: Paul M. Joeckel Title: Secretary and Vice President of Operations
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.516-1 Installed insulators.

Well-insulated insulators is interpreted to mean well-installed insulators. Insulated J-hooks may be used to suspend insulated power cables for temporary installation not exceeding 6 months and for permanent installation of control cables such as may be used along belt conveyors.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Mesa Verde
National ParkColorado
#### W. H. Lowe, appellee, v. M. Huber, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,389.

Suit on contract of employment. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kankakee county; the Hon. Arthur W. De Seim, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924. *Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 27, 1925.

Alex J. Powell and Werner H. Sommers, for appellant.

H. H. Wheeler and Miller & Streeter, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.
## APPENDIX L. Degradation Product Structures

(3 Pages)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         320,210
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  868,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,216,339
<PP&E>                                      28,295,756
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,600,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,019,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          764,069
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,254
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,735,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,019,312
<SALES>                                      5,337,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,440,182
<CGS>                                          961,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,980,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,456,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                   142,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,314,835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,314,835
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.92
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
the year ended  December  31, 1996 for  Hallwood  Energy  Partners,  L.P. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000768172
<NAME>                        Hallwood Energy Partners, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         5,540
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,380
<PP&E>                                         612,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                 523,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21,735
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     64,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,792
<SALES>                                        50,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               51,066
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                15,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            15,726
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   15,726
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.34
        



</TABLE>
#### SAMMONS et al., Respondents, v. ITHACA ST. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by Honorah Sammons, as administratrix, etc., and others, against the Ithaca Street Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 23, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 23, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0243. GLENN BRADLEY MAFFETT v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

ST14CR2126
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Educational Development Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  |   January 14,  2009           |   | By |      /s/  Randall W. White   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Randall W. White                             |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer       |
|   |                                         |   |
|   |                                         |   |
| Date:  |   January 14,  2009           |   | By |      /s/  Marilyn R. Welborn |   |
|   | Controller and Corporate Secretary           |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05237

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05237\05237_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05237\05237_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

05237\Certification Statement Plant ID 05237.pdf Plant certification statement

05237\Supporting Documents\KU-TY - Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05237\05237_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05237\05237_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 2004.24 Insider threat program. ( a ) Responsible CSAs oversee and analyze entity activity to ensure entities implement an insider threat program in accordance with the National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs (via requirements in the NISPOM or its equivalent) and guidance from the CSA. CSA oversight responsibilities include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Verifying that entities appoint insider threat program SOs;
( 2 ) Requiring entities to monitor, report, and review insider threat program activities and response actions in accordance with the provisions set forth in the NISPOM (or equivalent);
( 3 ) Providing entities with access to data relevant to insider threat program activities and applicable reporting requirements and procedures;
( 4 ) Providing entities with a designated means to report insider threat-related activity; and
( 5 ) Advising entities on appropriate insider threat training for entity employees eligible for access to classified information.
( b ) CSAs share with other CSAs any insider threat information reported to them by entities, as lawful and appropriate.