alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Core KM-3, a surface-to-bedrock record of late Cenozoic sedimentation in Searles Valley, California

By: George I. SmithV.J. BarczakG. F. MoultonJ. C. Liddicoat

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1256

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■ ■

■

★

■ ■

■

■

★

● ●

●

●

★

● ●

● ●
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Union Agreements in Agricultural-Machinery Industry, 1943

              																	Kassalow, Everett M. (Everett Malcolm). 						*Union Agreements in Agricultural-Machinery Industry, 1943 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 761*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4245,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
ALASKA CALIFORNIA FLORIDA MID-PACIFIC NORTHEAST NORTHERN ROCKIES 

NORTHWEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN WASHINGTON, DC INTERNATIONAL 

156 WILLIAM STREET SUITE 800 NEW YORK, NY 10038 

T: 212.791.1881 F: 212.918.1556 E: neo ffice@earthjustice.org W: www.earthjustice.org 

September 10, 1010 

Alan Carpien 

Office of General Counsel, U.S. EPA 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Daniel Dertke 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Environment & Natural Resources Div. 

Environmental Defense Section 

P.O. Box 23986 

Washington, D.C. 20026-3986 

Via Electronic Mail and U.S. Mail 

Dear Alan and Dan, 

 I am writing to confirm that the Sierra Club withdraws its January 29, 2009 petition to 

reconsider and repeal the 2008 Revisions to the Definition of Solid Waste in keeping with the 

terms of the settlement agreement entered into by the Sierra Club and the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (“EPA”) on September 7, 2010. 

 We are very pleased that EPA has agreed to consider the concerns raised in the petition in 

the context of a formal rulemaking process, and we very much look forward to working with the 

agency as that process goes forward. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Abigail Dillen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1997
<CASH>                                      13,859,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               76,193,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,651,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 97,938,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           216,020,000
<PP&E>                                     579,746,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             130,233,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             830,680,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      121,125,000
<BONDS>                                    509,799,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           146
<OTHER-SE>                                  89,421,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               830,680,000
<SALES>                                    311,068,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           311,068,000
<CGS>                                      233,727,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              233,727,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                31,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          28,408,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,058,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (7,000,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,058,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,058,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)
        

</TABLE>
#### GINGER ANN BRADY, R.D.H., Petitioner v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS, Respondent

No. 398A97

(Filed 6 March 1998)

Appeal by petitioner pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the unpublished decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 126 N.C. App. 829, 488 S.E.2d 855 (1997), affirming a judgment entered by Spencer (James C., Jr.), J., on 25 July 1996, in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 10 February 1998.

*Harry H. Harkins, Jr., for petitioner-appellant.*

*Bailey & Dixon, L.L.P., by Ralph McDonald and Denise Stanford Haskell, for respondent-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
section 1350): I, Gregory J. Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of ElkCorp, certify to my
knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. section 1350) that:  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2004, which this statement accompanies, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of ElkCorp. Date: November 5, 2004By
    
    /s/ Gregory J. FisherGregory J. FisherChief Financial Officer
§ 37.210 To what types of recipients may I award a TIA? ( a ) As a matter of DoD policy, you may award a TIA only when one or more for-profit firms are to be involved either in the: ( 1 ) Performance of the research project; or
( 2 ) The commercial application of the research results. In that case, you must determine that the nonprofit performer has at least a tentative agreement with specific for-profit partners who plan on being involved when there are results to transition. You should review the agreement between the nonprofit and for-profit partners, because the for-profit partners' involvement is the basis for using a TIA rather than another type of assistance instrument.
( b ) Consistent with the goals of civil-military integration, TIAs are most appropriate when one or more commercial firms (as defined at § 37.1250) are to be involved in the project.
( c ) You are encouraged to make awards to consortia (a consortium may include one or more for-profit firms, as well as State or local government agencies, institutions of higher education, or other nonprofit organizations). The reasons are that: ( 1 ) When multiple performers are participating as a consortium, they are more equal partners in the research performance than usually is the case with a prime recipient and subawards. All of them therefore are more likely to be directly involved in developing and revising plans for the research effort, reviewing technical progress, and overseeing financial and other business matters. That feature makes consortia well suited to building new relationships among performers in the defense and commercial sectors of the technology and industrial base, a principal objective for the use of TIAs.
( 2 ) In addition, interactions among the participants within a consortium potentially provide a self-governance mechanism. The potential for additional self-governance is particularly good when a consortium includes multiple for-profit participants that normally are competitors within an industry.
( d ) TIAs also may be used for carrying out research performed by single firms or multiple performers in prime award-subaward relationships. In awarding TIAs in those cases, however, you should consider providing for greater involvement of the program official or a way to increase self-governance (*e.g.,* a prime award with multiple subawards arranged so as to give the subrecipients more insight into and authority and responsibility for programmatic and business aspects of the overall project than they usually have).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF UNIQUE MOBILITY, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1996, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,230,246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  569,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    587,628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,453,461
<PP&E>                                       3,978,916
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,613,786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,712,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,984,264
<BONDS>                                        744,389
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,138,853
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,545,977)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,712,649
<SALES>                                        611,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,047,697
<CGS>                                        1,620,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,792,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (42,661)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             202,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,904,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,904,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,904,743)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 13a

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Caledonia Mining
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Stefan
E. Hayden, President of Caledonia , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Caledonia .

By:   /s/ S. E. HAYDEN
      ---------------------
      Stefan E. Hayden, President
      Caledonia Mining Corporation

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by Stefan E. Hayden and will be retained by Caledonia Mining
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Caledonia Mining
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven
W. Poad, Vice President Finance of Caledonia , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

3.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Caledonia .

By:   /s/ S. W. POAD
      -------------------
      Steven W. Poad, Vice President Finance
      Caledonia Mining Corporation

  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by Steven W. Poad and will be retained by Caledonia Mining Corporation
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
                                  upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF R.C.

PETITION OF: R.C. :

:

:

:

: No. 351 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of December, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Monroe, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[833 NYS2d 832]—

*1280Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Patricia D. Marks, J.), rendered May 21, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]) and two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (former § 265.03 [2]). We reject defendant’s contention that County Court erred in allowing in evidence a statement made by the victim to a police officer. Upon responding to the scene, the officer found the victim bleeding from a gunshot wound, and it appeared that the victim was going into shock. The victim was taken to the hospital, where he told the officer that he had been shot by “T.” Although the victim was coherent when he made the statement, he was in substantial pain. We conclude that the court properly admitted the testimony of the victim as an excited utterance because the victim was not capable of studied reflection, and the statement therefore had the necessary indicia of reliability (see *People v Cotto,*92 NY2d 68, 78-79 [1998]; *see generally People v Johnson,*1 NY3d 302, 305-307 [2003]). In any event, any error in the admission of the statement is harmless in light of the fact that there was no evidence that “T” was defendant, the victim testified that defendant shot him, and defendant admitted in his testimony that he shot the victim *(see People v Fermin,*250 AD2d 389 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 851 [1998], *cert denied*525 US 1111 [1999]; *see generally People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]). We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. Present— Martoche, J.P.., Smith, Centra, Lunn and Peradotto, JJ.
#### UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSN. v. SIMPSON

No. 309P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 393

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 September 1997.
No. 07

- 17

- 00153

- CV

Joe Busby Appellant

v. Alderson Enterprises Ltd, Inc. and Dennis Johnson Appellee s § § § § From the 99th District Court of Lubbock County July 18, 2017 Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 18, 2017 , it is ordered, adjudged and decree d that this appeal is dismissed.
It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which
let execution issue.
It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that inasmuch as the appeal is dismissed at the appellant’s request, no m otion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
### §§1727f, 1727g. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1512, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3633.

Section 1727f, act July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title III, §307, as added Aug. 3, 1977, Pub. L. 95–88, title II, §211(a)(2), 91 Stat. 551; amended Aug. 14, 1979, Pub. L. 96–53, title II, §207(b), 93 Stat. 369, related to annual presidential review of agreements for use of proceeds from sales of commodities.

A prior section 307 of act July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title III, as added Sept. 21, 1959, Pub. L. 86–341, title I, §12, 73 Stat. 609, which enacted section 1696 of this title, was repealed by Pub. L. 89–808, §2(D), Nov. 11, 1966, 80 Stat. 1535.

Section 1727g, act July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title III, §310, formerly §303, 68 Stat. 459; Pub. L. 85–931, §6, Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1791; Pub. L. 90–436, §7, July 29, 1968, 82 Stat. 451; renumbered §310, Pub. L. 95–88, title II, §211(a)(1), Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 548; Pub. L. 99–198, title XI, §1167(c), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1503, related to authority of Secretary to barter agricultural commodities for strategic and other materials.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Barter of Agricultural Commodities for Strategic and Critical Materials

Pub. L. 99–198, title XI, §1167(a), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1502, set out findings by Congress concerning the barter or exchange of agricultural commodities for strategic and critical materials for the national defense stockpile, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1572(3), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3702.
### §488h. Deadlines for regulations

The Secretary—

(1) shall issue a proposed rule implementing this part not later than 6 months after December 26, 2007; and

(2) issue a final rule implementing this part not later than 1 year after December 26, 2007.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §899I, as added Pub. L. 110–161, div. E, title V, §563(a), Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2089.)