alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010037EN.01003202.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2009 — EDF v Commission

(Case T-156/04) (1)

1

(State aid - Aid granted by the French authorities to EDF - Decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Procedural rights of the aid beneficiary - Effect on trade between Member States - Criterion of private investor)

2010/C 37/41

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Électricité de France (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Debroux, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra and C. Giolito, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the applicant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and A.-L. Vendrolini, Agents)

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the applicant:

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the defendant: Iberdrola, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado and É. Barbier de La Serre, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Articles 3 and 4 of the Commission’s Decision on State aid granted to EDF and to the gas and electricity industry sectors (C 68/2002, N 504/2003 and C 25/2003), adopted on 16 December 2003.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls articles 3 and 4 of the Commission’s Decision on State aid granted to EDF and to the gas and electricity industry sectors (C 68/2002, N 504/2003 and C 25/2003), adopted on 16 December 2003; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls articles 3 and 4 of the Commission’s Decision on State aid granted to EDF and to the gas and electricity industry sectors (C 68/2002, N 504/2003 and C 25/2003), adopted on 16 December 2003;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Électricité de France (EDF); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Électricité de France (EDF);

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs;

| 4. | Orders Iberdrola, SA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Iberdrola, SA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 10.7.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 15.9

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. on form S-8 (File No. 333-111310 ) of our report dated February 17, 2004 on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Notal Vision Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and for the years then ended, which is included in the Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. Annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 

 

 

 

| /s/ Kesselman & KesselmanCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International LimitedTel-Aviv, IsraelJuly 12, 2005 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 12 (Thursday, January 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more individuals that 
have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable 
legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property 
subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these individuals blocked, and U.S. 
persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with 
them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for effective date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2480; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; or 
Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and 
additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available 
on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On December 30, 2020 OFAC determined that the property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following 
individuals are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed 
below.

Individuals

    1. CORNIELLES RUIZ, Lorena Carolina, Coche Miguel Otero Silva 
Vereda 80, Casa 3, Caracas, Venezuela; DOB 03 Jul 1988; nationality 
Venezuela; Gender Female; Cedula No. V-18967792 (Venezuela) 
(individual) [VENEZUELA]. Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(ii)(C) of 
E.O. 13692, as amended by E.O. 13857, for being a current or former 
official of the Government of Venezuela.
    2. TORRES ESPINOZA, Ramon Antonio, Castillejo Principal del Portico 
0301, Guatire, Venezuela; DOB 13 Sep 1968; nationality Venezuela; 
Gender Male; Cedula No. V-6303894 (Venezuela) (individual) [VENEZUELA]. 
Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(ii)(C) of E.O. 13692, as amended by 
E.O. 13857, for being a current or former official of the Government of 
Venezuela.

    Dated: December 30, 2020.
Bradley T. Smith,
Deputy Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2020-29153 Filed 1-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
§ 552.128 Requirements for possession and use. All persons entering or otherwise on Fort Gordon may possess legally-defined and privately-owned firearms, ammunition, pellet and BB guns, knives, bows and arrows, and crossbows under the following conditions: ( a ) Privately-owned firearms, crossbows, pellet and BB guns possessed or stored on the installation must be registered at the Installation's Provost Marshal Office within 3 working days after arrival on the installation, or after obtaining the weapon, except: ( 1 ) Firearms legally brought onto the installation for the purpose of hunting or firing at an approved firing range, and only for the period of time the person possessing the firearms is hunting or firing on the range.
( 2 ) Firearms carried by federal, state, county, or local law enforcement personnel when in the performance of official law enforcement duties.
( b ) Personnel residing in family housing, bachelor officers' quarters/bachelor enlisted quarters/visiting officer quarters (BOQ/BEQ/VOQ) and guest housing, may store legally-acquired, authorized ammunition, knives with a blade measuring more than 3 inches, bows and arrows, registered crossbows, registered pellet and BB guns, and registered firearms within their quarters.
( c ) Personnel residing in troop billets may store legally-acquired authorized ammunition, knives and blades measuring more than 3 inches, bows and arrows, registered crossbows, registered pellet and BB guns and registered firearms in unit arms rooms. The unit arms room should utilize a standard weapons card and log book to document storage, removal, and return.
( d ) Persons 17 or under must be accompanied by a person over the age of 21, who will be responsible for compliance with the requirements of this subpart while hunting or target shooting on the installation and when purchasing legal arms (including knives with blades over 3 inches) and ammunition from installation retail outlets.
( e ) Persons must be in compliance with federal and state laws regarding possession (*i.e.*, age, criminal record restrictions, etc.).
( f ) Storage, accountability, and registration procedures will be in accordance with (IAW) Army Regulation (AR) 190-11 (Physical Security of Arms, Ammunition and Explosives) and supplements. Copies of the AR may be obtained from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.
( g ) Loss or theft of firearms and ammunition will be reported to the Fort Gordon military police desk sergeant immediately. Reports will contain all available details of the incident and a description of the lost item.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Sasol Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending 30 June 2014, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



Date: 29 September 2014By:

/s/ DAVID EDWARD CONSTABLEDavid Edward Constable President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: 29 September 2014By:

/s/ PAUL VICTORPaul Victor Acting Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Sasol Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even if the document with which it is
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549



FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Dated September 1, 2006



Commission File Number: 001-14666



MITTAL STEEL COMPANY N.V.

(Translation of registrants name into English)



15th Floor, Hofplein 20

3032 AC Rotterdam

The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-FxForm 40-Fo



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Yes o No x




If Yes marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):  82-________







| |  | 
| |  | 





---







On September 1, 2006, Mittal Steel Company N.V. issued the announcement attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, which is incorporated herein by reference.



Exhibit List



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                                   | 
|------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | September 1, 2006, Mittal Steel Company N.V. announces that it has granted 3,920, 050 options to purchase its Class A Shares.



| |  | 
| |  | 









---







SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: September 1, 2006



| |     |                         
| | --- | ------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Henk Scheffer       
| |     | Name: Henk Scheffer     
| |     | Title: Company Secretary







| |  | 
| |  | 





---







Exhibit Index



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                                   | 
|------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | September 1, 2006, Mittal Steel Company N.V. announces that it has granted 3,920, 050 options to purchase its Class A Shares.









| |  | 
| |  |
### §20982. Study, report, and recommendations on best practices for facilitating military and overseas voting

#### (a) Study

#### (1) In general

The Commission, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall conduct a study on the best practices for facilitating voting by absent uniformed services voters (as defined in section 20310(1) of this title) and overseas voters (as defined in section 20310(5) of this title).

#### (2) Issues considered

In conducting the study under paragraph (1) the Commission shall consider the following issues:

(A) The rights of residence of uniformed services voters absent due to military orders.

(B) The rights of absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters to register to vote and cast absentee ballots, including the right of such voters to cast a secret ballot.

(C) The rights of absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters to submit absentee ballot applications early during an election year.

(D) The appropriate preelection deadline for mailing absentee ballots to absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters.

(E) The appropriate minimum period between the mailing of absentee ballots to absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters and the deadline for receipt of such ballots.

(F) The timely transmission of balloting materials to absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters.

(G) Security and privacy concerns in the transmission, receipt, and processing of ballots from absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters, including the need to protect against fraud.

(H) The use of a single application by absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters for absentee ballots for all Federal elections occurring during a year.

(I) The use of a single application for voter registration and absentee ballots by absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters.

(J) The use of facsimile machines and electronic means of transmission of absentee ballot applications and absentee ballots to absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters.

(K) Other issues related to the rights of absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters to participate in elections.

#### (b) Report and recommendations

Not later than the date that is 18 months after October 29, 2002, the Commission shall submit to the President and Congress a report on the study conducted under subsection (a)(1) together with recommendations identifying the best practices used with respect to the issues considered under subsection (a)(2).

(Pub. L. 107–252, title II, §242, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1688.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15382 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §1562. False representations as certified seed; required provisions

Any labeling, advertisement, or other representation subject to this chapter which represents that any seed is certified seed or any class thereof shall be deemed to be false in this respect unless (a) it has been determined by a seed certifying agency that such seed conformed to standards of genetic purity and identity as to kind or variety, and is in compliance with the rules and regulations of such agency pertaining to such seed; and (b) the seed bears an official label issued for such seed by a seed certifying agency certifying that the seed is of a specified class and a specified kind or variety. Seed of a variety for which a certificate of plant variety protection under the Plant Variety Protection Act [7 U.S.C. 2321 et seq.] specifies sale only as a class of certified seed shall be certified only when

(1) the basic seed from which the variety was produced furnished by authority of the owner of the variety if the certification is made during the term of protection, and

(2) it conforms to the number of generations designated by the certificate, if the certificate contains such a designation.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title I, §102, as added Pub. L. 85–581, §4, Aug. 1, 1958, 72 Stat. 476; amended Pub. L. 91–89, §2, Oct. 17, 1969, 83 Stat. 134; Pub. L. 91–577, title III, §142(b), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1558.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Plant Variety Protection Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–577, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1542, which is classified principally to chapter 57 (§2321 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2321 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–577 inserted provisions setting out conditions for certification of seed of any variety for which a certificate of plant variety protection under the Plant Variety Protection Act specifies sale only as a class of certified seed.

1969—Pub. L. 91–89 struck out references to registered seed, and required labels, advertisement, or other representations to certify that the seed contained therein was determined by a seed certifying agency to be of a specified class and a specified kind of variety in conformity with the standards of genetic purity and identity as to kind or variety.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–577 effective Dec. 24, 1970, see section 141 of Pub. L. 91–577, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2321 of this title.
#### J. C. Williams, appellant, v. Frank F. Ferreria, appellee.

Gen. No. 29,509.

Motion to set aside judgment by confession on promissory note. Motion granted. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George B. Holmes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

James H. Turner, for appellant.

Ho appearance for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH THIRD QUARTER 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          52,355
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  317,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     38,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               493,892
<PP&E>                                       1,991,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,774,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          982,878
<BONDS>                                        665,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       113,197
<OTHER-SE>                                     595,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,774,066
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,937,782
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,843,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,979
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,984
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,984
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
AFS-14-130-E

February 28, 2014

Exemption No. 8333E

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2003-15381

Mr. E. Tazewell Ellett, Esq.

Counsel for Zero-Gravity Corporation

Hogan & Hartson, LLP

555 Thirteenth Street, 

NW. Washington, DC 

20004

Dear Mr. Ellett:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8333. 

It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and 

limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated January 22, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Amerijet International, Inc. (Amerijet), for an extension of Exemption No. 8333.

That exemption from §§ 91.303(f) and 91.307(c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

(14 CFR) allows Amerijet to operate a specially modified Boeing 727 aircraft (B-727) under 

14 CFR part 121 on behalf of the Zero- Gravity Corporation in parabolic flight operations (1)

when the flight visibility is less than 3 statute miles and (2) without each occupant of the 

aircraft wearing an approved parachute when the pilot executes an intentional maneuver that 

exceeds a nose-up or nose-down attitude of 30 degrees relative to the horizon.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Amerijet.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8333 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C.§§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I grant Amerijet International, Inc. an exemption from §§ 91.303(f) and 

91.307(c) to operate a specially modified Boeing 727 aircraft (B-727) under 14 CFR part 121 

on behalf of the Zero- Gravity Corporation in parabolic flight operations (1) when the flight 

visibility is less than 3 statute miles and (2) without each occupant of the aircraft wearing an 

approved parachute when the pilot executes an intentional maneuver that exceeds a nose-up or

nose-down attitude of 30 degrees relative to the horizon, subject to the conditions and 

limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. This exemption is not valid for operations outside of the United States. 

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8333 to May 31, 2016 unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service