alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1513 

Affirming the term ‘‘woke’’ and its historical connection to Black history, 

Black liberation movements, and social justice. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Ms. LEE of California submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Affirming the term ‘‘woke’’ and its historical connection to 

Black history, Black liberation movements, and social justice. 

Whereas Black history is a critical aspect of United States 

history and has shaped United States culture, including 

the evolution of language; 

Whereas the words ‘‘wake up’’ and ‘‘woke’’ have served as a 

call to action as conveyed by social activist Marcus Garvey who stated, ‘‘Wake up Ethiopia! Wake up Africa’’, 

and the Negro Mine Workers who in 1940 issued the 

statement, ‘‘We were asleep. But we will stay woke from 

now on’’, in advocating against discriminatory pay; 

Whereas the term ‘‘woke’’ was first highlighted in the 1962 

essay, ‘‘If You’re Woke, You Dig It’’, featured in the 

New York Times by Harlem-based writer William Melvin 

Kelley, who documented the cultural appropriation and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1513 IH 

distortion of language, resulting in certain idioms being 

abandoned by their original Black creators; 

Whereas the term ‘‘woke’’ has been similarly misused, as traditional media have reframed ‘‘woke’’ as trendy new 

slang, eroding its cultural connection and separating the 

term from its historical grounding in social justice; 

Whereas, six decades later, right-wing extremists have engaged in a similar exercise of cultural appropriation to 

weaponize and misdefine the term ‘‘woke’’, as evidenced 

by the ‘‘Stop W.O.K.E. Act’’, specifically targeting the 

teaching of United States history and Black educators; 

and 

Whereas Black educators are more likely to teach subjects 

that incorporate an inclusive view of history, and legislation like the End Woke Higher Education Act threaten 

to undermine both diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and nondiscrimination protections: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) affirms the term ‘‘woke’’ and its historical 

3 connection to Black history, Black liberation move4 ments, and social justice; 

5 (2) encourages a historically accurate and cor6 rect use of the term ‘‘woke’’ when its misuse is iden7 tified; and 

8 (3) condemns cultural appropriation, misuse of 

9 Black idioms, and specific efforts to revise history 

10 and to distort and redefine the specific term ‘‘woke’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1 | Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group Discussion

Regional Standards 

Enforcement Working Group

Defi
2 | Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group Discussion

Undefined Terms

42 USC § 6295(o)(6)(D)(ii): “...market participantsincluding ... dealers, contractors, and installers”• Dealer• Contractor• Installer
3 | Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group Discussion

Other terms?
EXHIBIT 99.06.0

SCHEDULE OF PENDING ASBESTOS LITIGATION as of December 31, 1998

o    The actions set forth below in New York are in the Supreme Court,  New York
     County  (unless  otherwise  indicated).  The  actions  set forth a standard
     complaint  containing  various causes of action  including causes of action
     seeking  $10,000,000 in  compensatory  damages and  $10,000,000 in punitive
     damages on behalf of each plaintiff.

PLAINTIFFS     Number of  plaintiffs is as per inception of case or as otherwise
               indicated.

DEFENDANTS     Number of  defendants  excludes  John Does and  unnamed  parties.
               Certain  named  defendants are  successors to other  entities not
               included in the count.  No  representation  is made as to whether
               the named  defendants  were all served or are still  party to the
               actions as to whether  additional  defendants  have been  brought
               into the  actions.  No  representation  is given as to whether or
               not all or any of the  defendants  are still engaged in business,
               have  insurance,  or  their  ability  to pay any  claim  judgment
               against them.
Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Unique Mobility, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements  
(Nos. 33-23113, 33-24071, 33-34612, 33-35055, 33-34613, 33-41325, 33-64852, 
33-47454, 33-81430 and 33-92288) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements
( No. 33-61166 and 33-63399) on Form S-3 of Unique Mobility, Inc. of our report 
dated December 22, 1995 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Unique 
Mobility, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 1995 and 1994 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 1995, which report
appears in the October 31, 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unique Mobility,
Inc. 


                                        "KPMG Peat Marwick LLP"
                                         KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Denver, Colorado
January 26, 1996
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul M. Anderson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy.



|                     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  | /s/ Paul M. Anderson                             
|                     |  | Paul M. Anderson                                 
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 275.6 Cost reimbursement.

Cost reimbursement to financial institutions for providing financial records will be made consistent with 12 CFR part 219, subpart A.
Exhibit 11

                            DYNCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATIONS OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                 (Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)

                                     Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                   June 26,      June 27,    June 26,  June 27,
                                   1997          1996        1997      1996
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED
Earnings:
 Earnings from continuing
 operations before
 extraordinary item               $2,035        $3,553      $4,346      $5,794
 Discontinued operations               -           865           -         865

 Net earnings                      2,035         4,418       4,346       6,659
 Preferred stock Class C
  dividends not declared or
  recorded                             -          (558)          -      (1,092)

 Common stockholders' share
  of earnings                     $2,035        $3,860      $4,346      $5,567

 Shares:
  Weighted average common
   shares outstanding          8,863,265     8,427,168   8,732,800   8,483,667
  Common stock issuable
   upon exercise of warrants   1,416,259     3,247,372   1,931,871   3,254,338
  Common stock issuable upon
   exercise of stock options     136,430         2,387     131,860       2,387

                              10,415,954    11,676,927  10,796,531  11,740,392

 Earnings from continuing
  operations before
  extraordinary item               $0.20         $0.26       $0.40       $0.40
 Discontinued operations               -          0.07           -        0.07

Common stockholders' share
 of earnings                       $0.20         $0.33       $0.40       $0.47
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          51,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,628
<INVENTORY>                                     51,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,825
<PP&E>                                          67,229
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,159
<BONDS>                                        565,285
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (337,246)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,082
<SALES>                                        109,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,143
<CGS>                                           33,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,516
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,889)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,956)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,933)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,289,198
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    186,980
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         389,714
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,302,980
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,168,872
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      832,284
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             95,151
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 927,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,000
<PREFERRED>                                    223,077<F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,258,398
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   47,703
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     40,826
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                20,762
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,647,671
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,168,872
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      566,990
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            37,827
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     438,014
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     475,841
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         91,149
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              19,672
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 110,821
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        46,816<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                    64,005<F3>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,989
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   62,016<F3>
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        57,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       40,902
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         147,773
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Includes $12,470 of Preference Stock
<F2>Includes $6,281 of Monthly Income Preferred Securities Dividend Requirements
<F3>Excludes $82,548 extraordinary restructuring charge (net of taxes)
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 880.11 Qualifications of projects.

The purpose of all projects is to prevent injury and loss of life, protect public health, conserve natural resources, or protect public and private property. Federal funds cannot be used to fund projects in privately owned operating coal mines. Further, any such cooperative agreement that is entered into under the Energy Policy Act of 1992 with an AML State eligible to receive funds from the Appalachian Regional Development Commission is not subject to review by that Commission.

[59 FR 52377, Oct. 17, 1994]
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350),
the undersigned, Melissa Van Valkenburgh, Chief Financial Officer of ECC
International Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of the
Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                             
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Melissa Van Valkenburgh                                 
| |  |                                                             
| |  | Melissa Van Valkenburgh
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003
#### NEW HANOVER COUNTY v. JACKSON

No. 320P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 435

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
#### ROBINETTE v. BARRIGER

No. 527A94

Case below: 342 N.C. 181

342 N.C. 666

Motion by plaintiff for reconsideration of petition to rehear denied 4 December 1997.

Justice Orr recused.
#### § 37.700 What are the requirements for supplies?

Your expenditure-based TIA's provisions should permit participants to use their existing procedures to account for and manage supplies. A fixed-support TIA should not include requirements to account for or manage supplies.
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Yaron Elad, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 11, 2015





/s/ Yaron Elad

Yaron Elad

Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)
#### § 175.1 Purpose.

This part describes the process for filing a request for indemnification or defense, or providing proper notice to DoD, of a third-party claim pursuant to section 330 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, Public Law 102-484, October 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2371, as amended (hereafter “section 330”), or section 1502(e) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, Public Law 106-398, October 30, 2000, 1014 Stat. 1654A-350, as amended (hereafter “section 1502(e)”). This process identifies the minimum information that a request for indemnification or defense or notice to DoD of a third-party claim for indemnification must include, where that information must be sent, how to make such a request or provide such a notice, the time limits that apply to such a request or notice, and other requirements.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 4967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28875]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

19 CFR Chapter I


Notification of Temporary Travel Restrictions Applicable to Land 
Ports of Entry and Ferries Service Between the United States and 
Canada; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notification of continuation of temporary travel restrictions; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is making 
corrections to a notice that appeared in the Federal Register on 
December 22, 2020. The document contained incorrect dates.

DATES: The corrections apply to the notification published in the 
Federal Register December 22, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Watson, Office of Field 
Operations Coronavirus Coordination Cell, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) at 202-325-0840.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 22, 2020, in FR Doc. 2020-
28381--
    <bullet> On page 83432, in the first column, correct the words 
``January 21, 2020.'' to read, ``January 21, 2021.''; and
    <bullet> On page 83433, in the second column, correct the words 
``January 21, 2020.'' to read, ``January 21, 2021.''

Christina E. McDonald,
Associate General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2020-28875 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-12-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8029

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ISSAC RASHAD BELT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:04-cr-00559-AW-6)

Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Thomas Sarachan, Staff 

Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. 

Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Barbara S. Sale, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Issac Rashad Belt appeals the district court’s order 

granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). Although the district court granted Belt’s 

§ 3582 motion, the court did not reduce Belt’s sentence to the 

full extent he requested. On appeal, Belt argues that, under 

the Supreme Court’s decision in Dorsey v. United States, 132 S. 

Ct. 2321 (2012), the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA”), Pub. 

L. No. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2372, should apply to his motion. 

Contrary to Belt’s assertion, however, Dorsey did not alter this 

court’s prior holding that the FSA does not apply retroactively 

to defendants sentenced prior to its effective date. See United 

States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 248 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 

132 S. Ct. 356 (2011).* Because Belt was sentenced in April 

2006, prior to the FSA’s effective date, the FSA had no effect 

on Belt’s mandatory minimum sentence, and the district court 

properly concluded that Belt was not entitled to a sentence 

reduction under the Act. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the 

 * Belt’s attempt to distinguish Bullard is meritless, as the 

Supreme Court made clear in Dorsey that the FSA does not apply 

to defendants sentenced before the FSA’s effective date of 

August 3, 2010. 132 S. Ct. at 2335; see United States v. 

Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 201 (4th Cir. 2010) (acknowledging that 

consideration of a § 3582(c)(2) motion does not constitute “a 

full resentencing by the court”). 
3

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.B




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2008, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
John R. Sult, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Controller, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 
  /s/ John R. SultJohn
      R. SultSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)El
      Paso Natural Gas CompanyAugust
      8, 2008
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El PasoNatural
Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
### §12d. Commission action for noncompliance with export sales reporting requirements

The Commission may, in accordance with the procedures provided for in this chapter, refuse to register, register conditionally, or suspend, place restrictions upon, or revoke the registration of, any person, and may bar for any period as it deems appropriate any person from using or participating in any manner in any market regulated by the Commission, if such person is subject to a final decision or order of any court of competent jurisdiction or agency of the United States finding such person to have knowingly violated any provision of the export sales reporting requirements of section 612c–3 1 of this title, or of any regulation issued thereunder.

(Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §8d, as added Pub. L. 97–444, title II, §226, Jan. 11, 1983, 96 Stat. 2316.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 612c–3 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1578, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3702.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 11, 1983, see section 239 of Pub. L. 97–444, set out as an Effective Date of 1983 Amendment note under section 2 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.