alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert C. Stempel, certify that:

  1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form 10-Q of Energy
  Conversion Devices, Inc.;

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
  a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
  report.

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
    prepared;

    b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
    the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
    fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
    reporting; and

  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
  our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
  the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
  directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
    likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
    summarize and report financial information; and

    b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
  employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
  over financial reporting.


                                        /s/ Robert C. Stempel
                                        ---------------------------------
   Date: May 17, 2004                   Robert C. Stempel
                                        Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of EDO Corporation, a New York corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 24, 2005 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: October 28, 2005             /s/ JAMES M. SMITH
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: James M. Smith
                                    Title: Chairman, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer


Dated: October 28, 2005             /s/ FREDERIC B. BASSETT
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Frederic B. Bassett
                                    Title: Vice President-Finance, Treasurer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.3



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Duquesne Light Company (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Morgan K. OBrien, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (5) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 10thday of May, 2005.



/s/ Morgan K. OBrienMorgan K. OBrienPresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Duquesne Light Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SECOND DEPARTMENT,

DECEMBER, 1978

(December 4, 1978)

#### Leonard Caparatta et al., Plaintiffs, v. Fabrizio De Rosa, Defendant. Gerard Gering, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Cities Service Company, Doing Business as Citgo, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 20, 1978, as, upon reargument of its motion for summary judgment, adhered to the original determination denying the motion. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion for summary judgment granted. The service station, on which premises the accident occurred, is owned by the Maine Turnpike Authority. The authority leased the premises to the third-party defendant Cities Service Company. Permission was subsequently granted to permit the subleasing of the premises, with a conversion from a "salaried operation” to a "lessee dealer operation”. At the time of the accident such a sublease was in effect. In the complaint and plaintiffs’ bill of particulars, it is alleged that plaintiff Leonard Caparatta was injured when one of the defendants struck with a hammer or similar device a wheel bearing on a truck belonging to defendant De Rosa which caused a piece of metal to be propelled into Caparatta’s eye. In the third-party complaint and bill of particulars of the third-party plaintiff it is alleged that Cities Service was negligent in the ownership, operation and control of the service station in failing to provide a safe place for the defendants to work, in failing to provide them with adequate and proper tools, and in failing to supervise the repairs which were being made by the defendants with the consent of Cities Service in a "bay” service area of the station. Pursuant to the sublease, which was authorized by Cities Service, it had no control over the business and maintenance of the service station and could not direct the conduct and operations of the business in any respect. Thus, there is no basis for imposing liability on Cities Service (cf. *Jankowski v Crestburn Corp.,*23 AD2d 783, affd 17 NY2d 514). We also note in regard to the argument that the third-party plaintiff was a third-party beneficiary of the agreement between the Maine Turnpike Authority and Cities Service, a similar contention was rejected by this court in an opinion by Mr. Justice Hopkins in *Kornblut v Chevron Oil Co.*(62 AD2d 831). Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Hawkins and O'Connor, JJ., concur.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-20-00042-CV 

RORY CALHOUN, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

METROPLEX HOMES, LLC, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Tarrant County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2019-008620-1, Honorable Don Pierson, Presiding 

 

May 5, 2020 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant Rory Calhoun appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee 

Metroplex Homes, LLC. Calhoun’s brief was originally due on April 6, 2020, but was not 

filed. By letter of April 14, 2020, we notified Calhoun that the appeal would be dismissed 

for want of prosecution if his brief was not received by April 24, 2020. To date, we have 

not received a brief, a motion to extend the deadline for filing same, or any further 

communication from Calhoun.
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.1 TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1).

Per Curiam

1 On April 2, 2020, Metroplex Homes filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is rendered 

moot.
First Amendment to Building Lease Agreement for R, C1 and C2 Buildings



 Exhibit 10.11(a) 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO BUILDING LEASE AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to Building Lease Agreement (this
“Amendment”) is entered into as of December 30, 2005 by and between Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. (“Lessee”) and MagnaChip Semiconductor Ltd. (“Lessor”) (each a “Party”, and collectively the
“Parties”). 
 WHEREAS, the Parties are parties to that certain Building Lease Agreement with respect to R Building, C1 Building and C2 Building
located in Cheong-Ju, dated as of October 6, 2004 (the “Agreement”), and wish to amend the Agreement as set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
the Parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 6.1 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

 “Lessor shall provide an invoice (the “Invoice”) to Lessee by the last day of each calendar month which shall include the amounts of Rent (including Taxes), Lessor Maintenance Fee, Other Costs (as
defined in Section 6.3) and the corresponding VAT amount payable by Lessee for such month. Lessee shall pay in aggregate the Rent, Lessor Maintenance Fee, Other Costs and the corresponding VAT amount stated on each Invoice to the Lessor’s
designated account, or as otherwise designated by Lessor, by means of a wire transfer in immediately available funds by the 25th day of the next calendar month following the date of the Invoice (the “Due Date”). Lessee shall review each Invoice for Taxes by the 20th day of the next calendar month following the date of the Invoice, and, notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if not in agreement with the amount, then Lessee may require the Lessor to
contest such Taxes as provided in Section 4.3 of this Agreement.” 
  

	 	2.	Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 

  

	 	3.	Wherever necessary, all terms of the Agreement are hereby amended to be consistent with the terms of this Amendment. Except as set forth herein, the Agreement remains in full force
and effect according to its terms. 

  

 1 









	 	4.	This Amendment shall become effective from the 6th of October, 2004. 

  

	 	5.	This Amendment shall be governed by, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of Korea. 

 [Signature Page Follows] 
  

 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Amendment as of the
date first set forth above. 
  

			
	MagnaChip Semiconductor, Ltd.
		
	 By:
	 	  
	 Name:
	 	 Youm Huh

	 Title:
	 	 President & Chief Executive Officer

	
	Hynix Semiconductor, Inc.
		
	 By:
	 	  
	 Name:
	 	
	 Title:
	 	

  

 3
### §1364. Compensation of review committee

The members of the review committee shall receive as compensation for their services the same per diem as that received by the members of the committee utilized for the purposes of chapter 3B of title 16. The members of the review committee shall not be entitled to receive compensation for more than thirty days in any one year.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §364, 52 Stat. 63.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Chapter 3B [§590a et seq.] of title 16, referred to in text, was in the original a reference to the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act.
#### Rose Gangone et al., Respondents, v. J. J. Newberry Co., Inc., Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, medical expenses and loss of services, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 12, 1962 after trial, on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. Judgment reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The court has considered the questions of fact and has determined that it would not grant a new trial upon those questions. In our opinion it was error of law to refuse to permit the plaintiff to state that a portion of the step crumbled when she stepped on it. It is also our opinion that the charge as a whole was obscure and inadequately stated the issues and the applicable law (cf. *Logan*v. *Jackson,*1 A D 2d 146). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 536.124 Settlement authority for maritime claims. ( a ) The Secretary of the Army, the Army General Counsel as designee of the Secretary, or other designee of the Secretary may approve any settlement or compromise of a claim in any amount. A claim settled or compromised in a net amount exceeding $500,000 will be investigated and processed and, if approved by the Secretary of the Army or his or her designee, will be certified to Congress for final approval.
( b ) The Judge Advocate General (TJAG), The Assistant Judge Advocate General (TAJAG), the Commander USARCS, the Chief Counsel COE, or Division or District Counsel Offices are delegated authority to settle, such as to deny or approve payment in full or in part, any claim under this subpart regardless of the amount claimed, provided that any award does not exceed $100,000.
( c ) A Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) or chief of a command claims service and heads of area claims offices (ACOs) are delegated authority to pay up to $50,000, regardless of the amount claimed, and to disapprove or make a final offer on a claim presented in an amount not exceeding $50,000.
( d ) Authority to further delegate payment authority is set forth in § 536.3(g)(1) of this part. For further discussion also related to settlement and approval authority see paragraph 2-69 of DA Pam 27-162.
( e ) Where the claimed amount or potential claim damage exceeds $100,000 for COE claims or $50,000 for all others, Commander USARCS will be notified immediately, and be furnished a copy of the claim and a mirror file thereafter. See § 536.30 and AR 27-20, paragraph 2-12.
§ 2700.42 Responsibility for safeguarding classified information. ( a ) *General Policy.* The specific responsibility for the maintenance of the security of classified information rest with each person having knowledge or physical custody therof, no matter how obtained. The ultimate responsibility for safeguarding classified information rests on each supervisor to the same degree that supervisor is charged with functional responsibility.
( b ) *Security and Top Secret Control Officers.* The Director, OMSN, and the Status Liaison Officer, Saipan, are assigned specific security responsibilities as Security Officer and Top Secret Control Officer.
( c ) *Handling.* All documents bearing the terms “Top Secret,” “Secret” and “Confidential” shall be delivered to the Top Secret Control Officer or his designee immediately upon receipt. All potential recipients of such documents shall be advised of the names of such designees and updated information as necessary. In the event that the Top Secret Control Officer or his designees are not available to receive such documents, they shall be turned over to the office supervisor and secured, unopened, in a designated combination safe located in OMSN or SLNO, as appropriate until the Top Secret Control Officer is available. All materials not immediately deliverable to the Top Secret Control Officer shall be delivered at the earliest opportunity. Under no circumstances shall classified material that cannot be delivered to the Top Secret Control Officer be stored other than in the designated safe.
( d ) *Storage.* All classified documents shall be stored in the designated combination safe or safes located in OMSN or SLNO as appropriate. The combination shall be changed as required by ISOO Directive No. 1, section IV F (5)(a). The combinations shall be known only to the Security Officer and his designees with the appropriate security clearance.
( e ) *Security Education Program.* The Security Officer shall establish a program of briefings to familiarize personnel with the provisions of E.O. 12065 and implementing directives. Such briefings shall be held once per year, or more frequently. Before any new or newly assigned employee enters on duty, he shall be given instruction in sufficient detail in security procedures and practices to inform him of his responsibilities arising from his access to classified data.
( f ) *Access by Historical Researchers and Former Presidential Appointees.* In keeping with provisions 4-301 and 4-302 of E.O. 12065, the President's Personal Representative for Micronesian Status Negotiations shall designate appropriate officials to determine, prior to granting access to classified information, the propriety of such action in the interest of national security and assurance of the recipient's trustworthiness and need-to-know.
Exhibit 15.6

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-111310) of Elron Electronic
Industries Ltd pertaining to the Employees Stock Option Plans of Elron
Electronic Industries Ltd. of our report dated January 30, 2005, with respect
to the financial statements of ChipX (Israel) Limited (former name: Chip
Express (Israel) Ltd), included in Elron Electronic Industries Ltd.s Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.

|                |                                   
|--------------- | ----------------------------------
|Haifa,
  Israel | /s/ KOST
  FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
|June 25,
  2006 | A Member of Ernst & Young Global  

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           25924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    19164
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1010
<INVENTORY>                                       5705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 53599
<PP&E>                                           91511
<DEPRECIATION>                                   57735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   93025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10412
<BONDS>                                            157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         53125
<OTHER-SE>                                      121862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     93025
<SALES>                                          73238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 73238
<CGS>                                            49921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    49921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 13587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  10405
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3822
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6583
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>