alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00045- CR
Christopher Bradley Young, App ellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 27TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 710 01, TH E H ONO RAB LE JO HN GAUNTT, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A ND U M O PI N I O N
After a bench trial, the trial court found appellant Christopher Br adley Young guilty of evading detention with a vehicle, see Tex. Penal Code § 38.04, and, pursuant t o the repe at offe nder provision of the Penal Code, assessed appellant’ s punishment at confine ment in the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice for five year s, see id. § 12.42(a)

. Appellant’s court-a

ppointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appea l is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the require ments of Anders v. Calif

ornia by prese nting a profe ssional evaluation of the rec ord demonstrating why there

are no arg

uable g rounds to be advanc ed. See Anders v. Calif ornia , 3 8 6 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State , 300 S.W .3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988).Appellant’s counsel has repr esente d to this Court that she sent copies of the motion

and brief t o appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appe llate re cord a nd file a pro se response, and p ro v i d ed a m o tion to assist appellant in obtaining the rec ord. See Kelly v. Stat e , 436 S.W .3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Ander s , 386 U.S. at 744. Appellant reque sted acc ess to the appellate rec ord, and pursuant to this Court’s order the cler k of the trial court provided written verific ation to this Court that the rec ord was provided to ap p el l ant. See Kelly , 436 S.W .3d at 321. To date, appellant has not filed a pro se response or reque sted an extension of time to file a re sponse.

We have conducte d an independe nt revie w of the rec ord and find no reve rsible err or. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; Garner , 300 S.W .3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the rec ord prese nts no arg uably meritorious grounds for revie w and the appea l is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is grante d. Th e judgme nt of conviction is aff irmed.

__________________________________________

J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Affir med Filed: September

17, 2014 Do Not Publish

2
### §1450. Repealed. Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title II, §203(b), 68 Stat. 899

Section, acts Mar. 31, 1950, ch. 81, §5, 64 Stat. 42; Jan. 30, 1954, ch. 2, §5(a), 68 Stat. 7, provided that for the crop year of 1951 and thereafter, no price support would be available for Irish potatoes unless marketing quotas were in effect.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—HEMP PRODUCTION
### §1593. Standards, tests, tolerances

(a) The samplings, analyses, tests, or examinations of seeds made in connection with the administration of this chapter shall be made by methods set forth by rules and regulations prescribed under section 1592 of this title.

(b) The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized and directed to make and promulgate by rules and regulations, reasonable tolerances as to the percentages and rates of occurrence required to be stated or required by this chapter.

(c) For the purpose of section 1571(b) of this title, the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized and directed to investigate, determine, establish, and promulgate from time to time such reasonable standards of germination for each kind of vegetable seed as will in his judgment best protect crop production.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title IV, §403, 53 Stat. 1285.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

See section 1610 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1498 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1498

   Supporting the designation of ``National Bourbon Heritage Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2024

   Mr. McGarvey (for himself, Mr. Barr, and Mr. Comer) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                           and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Supporting the designation of ``National Bourbon Heritage Month''.

Whereas bourbon is the only spirit distinctive to the United States, and 
        Congress declared bourbon as ``America's Native Spirit'' in 1964;
Whereas Kentucky is the birthplace of bourbon and the true home of America's 
        only native spirit;
Whereas Kentucky produces 95 percent of the world's supply of bourbon;
Whereas Kentucky has 100 licensed distilleries operated by 84 companies in 42 
        counties;
Whereas bourbon contributes over $9 billion and 23,000 jobs to Kentucky's 
        economy every year;
Whereas Kentucky distilleries shipped over $500 million of products abroad in 
        2022, most of which was bourbon;
Whereas bourbon production uses millions of bushels of corn and other grains 
        grown by Kentucky farmers;
Whereas bourbon is synonymous with Kentucky all over the world;
Whereas Kentucky distillers play a critical role in promoting responsible 
        consumption of their products and fighting against underage use, high-
        risk drinking, and impaired driving;
Whereas the Kentucky Bourbon Trail is celebrating its 25th anniversary this 
        year; and
Whereas, during the month of September, the Federal Government, States, cities, 
        and towns will celebrate ``National Bourbon Heritage Month'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Bourbon Heritage 
        Month'';
            (2) recognizes bourbon as ``America's Native Spirit'' and 
        celebrates its place in American history and culture; and
            (3) recognizes the contributions of the Commonwealth of 
        Kentucky to the culture of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
§ 552.74 Grounds for suspension. The installation commander will deny or revoke permission of a company and its agents to conduct commercial activities on the installation if it is in the best interests of the command. The grounds for taking this action will include, but will not be limited to, the following: ( a ) Failure of company to meet the licensing and other regulatory requirements prescribed in § 552.56.
( b ) An agent or representative engaged in any of the solicitation practices prohibited by this regulation.
( c ) Substantiated adverse complaints or reports about the quality of the goods, services, or commodities and the manner in which they are offered for sale.
( d ) Personal misconduct by agents or representatives while on the military installation.
( e ) The possession of or any attempt to obtain allotment forms, or to assist or coordinate the administrative processing of such forms.
( f ) Knowing and willful violation of the Truth-in-Lending Act or Federal Regulation Z.
( g ) Failure to incorporate and abide by the Standards of Fairness policies. (See § 552.83.)
### §186. Miscellaneous provisions

#### (a) Classification

To the greatest extent practicable, research conducted or supported by the Department shall be unclassified.

#### (b) Construction

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to preclude any Under Secretary of the Department from carrying out research, development, demonstration, or deployment activities, as long as such activities are coordinated through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology.

#### (c) Regulations

The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, may issue necessary regulations with respect to research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation activities of the Department, including the conducting, funding, and reviewing of such activities.

#### (d) Notification of Presidential life sciences designations

Not later than 60 days before effecting any transfer of Department of Energy life sciences activities pursuant to section 183(1)(D) of this title, the President shall notify the appropriate congressional committees of the proposed transfer and shall include the reasons for the transfer and a description of the effect of the transfer on the activities of the Department of Energy.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title III, §306, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2168.)
§ 1642.7 Types of decisions. ( a ) A board may grant a classification into Class 3-A for such period of time it deems appropriate but in no event the period exceed one year.
( b ) Upon the expiration of a 3-A classification a board shall review any request for an extension of the classification as if it were the first request for that classification, and the fact that the registrant was placed in Class 3-A under apparently similar circumstances will not be a factor in the decision of the board. This section does not relieve a registrant from his duties under § 1621.1 of this chapter.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) A board shall deny a claim for Class 3-A when the evidence fails to meet the criteria established in this part.
[47 FR 4658, Feb. 1, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 24458, July 1, 1987]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward Tempro, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 29, 1977, convicting him of *827endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the facts, indictment dismissed, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. The guilt of defendant was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1  

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

5001 Spring Valley Road

Suite 800 East

Dallas, Texas 75244 

September 29, 2006 

 

Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.

Av. República do Chile, 65/1702

Rio de Janeiro

Brazil 20035-900 

Gentlemen: 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the registration statement on Form F-3, Registration No. 333-118644, of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.—Petrobras and Petrobras International Finance Company (together, the “Registrants”), of the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton contained in the Annual Report of the Registrants on Form 20–F for the year ended December 31, 2005, under the heading Presentation of Information Concerning Reserves and under the heading Item 4—INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY—Exploration, Development and Production—Reserves. 

|   |                                                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                        |
|   | Very truly yours,                                                           |
|   | /s/  DeGolyer and MacNaughton       |
|   | DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON                                                    |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         27
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,331
<PP&E>                                           1,523
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              555
<BONDS>                                            975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        350
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,947
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   239
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     83
<INCOME-TAX>                                        32
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 51
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        51
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### RECORD, Respondent, v. BEDELL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 4, 1905.)

Action by Mary A. Record against Ida Bedell, as executrix of Martha K. Bordwell, deceased. No opinión. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSUE FAURELUS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 710 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of February, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# C_2009032EN.01002501.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/25

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 December 2008 — Ryanair v Commission

(Case T-196/04) (1)

1

(State aid - Agreements entered into by the Walloon Region and the Brussels South Charleroi airport with the airline Ryanair - Existence of an economic advantage - Application of the private investor in a market economy test)

(2009/C 32/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented: initially by D. Gleeson, A. Collins, SC, V. Power and D. McCann, Solicitors, and subsequently by V. Power and D. McCann, J. Swift, QC, J. Holmes, Barrister, and G. Berrisch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Khan, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Association of European Airlines (AEA) (represented by: S. Völcker, F. Louis and J. Heithecker, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission Decision of 12 February 2004 concerning advantages granted by the Walloon Region and Brussels South Charleroi Airport to the airline Ryanair in connection with its establishment at Charleroi (OJ 2004 L 137, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2004/393/EC of 12 February 2004 concerning advantages granted by the Walloon Region and Brussels South Charleroi Airport to the airline Ryanair in connection with its establishment at Charleroi; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2004/393/EC of 12 February 2004 concerning advantages granted by the Walloon Region and Brussels South Charleroi Airport to the airline Ryanair in connection with its establishment at Charleroi;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Ryanair Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Ryanair Ltd;

| 3. | Orders the Association of European Airlines (AEA) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Association of European Airlines (AEA) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 11.9.2004.

1

---
§ 2400.6 Classification levels. ( a ) National security information (hereinafter “classified information”) shall be classified at one of the following three levels: ( 1 ) “Top Secret” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.
( 2 ) “Secret” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security.
( 3 ) “Confidential” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided by statute, no other terms shall be used to identify classified information. Markings other than “Top Secret,” “Secret,” and “Confidential,” such as “For Official Use Only,” shall not be used to identify national security information. In addition, no other term or phrase shall be used in conjunction with one of the three authorized classification levels, such as “Secret Sensitive” or “Agency Confidential.” The terms “Top Secret”, “Secret”, and “Confidential” should not be used to identify nonclassified executive branch information.
( c ) Unnecessary classification, and classification at a level higher than is necessary shall be scrupulously avoided.
( d ) If there is reasonable doubt about the need to classify information, it shall be safeguarded as if it were classified “Confidential” pending a determination by an original classification authority, who shall make this determination within thirty (30) days. If there is reasonable doubt about the appropriate level of classification the originator of the information shall safeguard it at the higher level of classification pending a determination by an original classification authority, who shall make this determination within thirty (30) days. Upon the determination of a need for classification and/or the proper classification level, the information that is classified shall be marked as provided in § 2400.12 of this part.
#### § 1901.43 Determination(s) by Deputy Director(s).

Each Deputy Director in charge of a directorate which originated or has an interest in any of the records subject to the appeal, or designee, is a required party to any appeal; other interested parties may become involved through the request of the Coordinator when it is determined that some or all of the information is also within their official cognizance. These parties shall respond in writing to the Coordinator with a finding as to the exempt or non-exempt status of the information including citations to the applicable exemption and/or their agreement or disagreement as to the requested amendment and the reasons therefore. Each response shall be provided expeditiously on a “first-in, first-out” basis taking into account the business requirements of the parties and consistent with the information rights of members of the general public under the various information review and release laws.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ERIE
FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS DATED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000033416
<NAME> ERIE FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           657,082
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     150,868
<MORTGAGE>                                       8,381
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    1,417
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 868,421
<CASH>                                           5,937
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 318
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          79,742
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 989,735
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                747,156
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                210
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   2,509
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            4,819
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,410
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   989,735
<PREMIUMS>                                      22,115
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             32,100
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               3,852
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     515
<BENEFITS>                                      29,190
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      3,933
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             6,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,940
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,387
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0










</TABLE>
Exhibit 8.1



The following table sets forth a list of our subsidiaries. Omitted from the table are those subsidiaries which are not significant subsidiaries (as defined in rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended).

| | Name of Subsidiary                      |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
| | --------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
| | Elbit Ltd.                              |  | Israel                       
| | DEP Technology Holdings Ltd.            |  | Israel                       
| | Given Imaging Ltd.                      |  | Israel                       
| | Netvision Ltd.                          |  | Israel                       
| | A.M.T Advanced Metal Technologies Ltd.  |  | Israel                       
| | Oncura Inc.                             |  | USA                          
| | RDC Rafael Development Corporation Ltd. |  | Israel                       
| | Medingo Ltd.                            |  | Israel                       
| | Starling Advanced Communications Ltd.   |  | Israel                       

---