Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 AGENCY: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, HHS.
 ACTION: Request for public comment.
 SUMMARY: The Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (OPRE), Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), is requesting a 3-year extension with changes to continue collecting data for the study Variations in Implementation of Quality Interventions (VIQI). In addition to extending data collection, OPRE proposes to update burden estimates to accommodate a different sample size of centers, administrators, teachers, and coaches; to revise data collection instruments and activities for the impact evaluation and process study in line with lessons learned during the pilot study; to add a second timepoint of data collection for the teacher reports to questions about children; to provide one new instrument to collect parent report of children's skills and behaviors; and to provide one new instrument in anticipation of COVID-19 necessitating further information gathering to contextualize findings from the impact evaluation and process study.
 DATES: *Comments due within 60 days of publication.*
                         In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ACF is soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described above.
 ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and comments may be forwarded by emailing 
                        *OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov.*
                         Alternatively, copies can also be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20201, Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer. All requests, emailed or written, should be identified by the title of the information collection.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  *Description:*
                     Through the VIQI Project, OPRE aims to inform policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders about effective ways to support the quality and effectiveness of early care and education (ECE) centers for promoting young children's learning and development. The VIQI Project completed a pilot study in about 40 centers in three metropolitan areas in 2018-2019 that is informing a year-long impact evaluation and process study that involves testing the effectiveness of two curricular and professional development models aiming to strengthen the quality of classroom processes and children's outcomes. The impact evaluation and process study is expected to begin in the fall of 2021 and will include about 140 community-based and Head Start ECE centers spread across about 12 different metropolitan areas in the United States. The VIQI Project will consist of a 3-group experimental design where the initial quality and other characteristics of ECE centers are measured. For details about the study design, see the Supporting Statements at 
                    *https://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAViewDocument?​ref_​nbr=​202008-0970-009.* In anticipation of changes to center characteristics due to COVID-19, annual burden estimates and instruments have been updated to accommodate a different sample size of centers, administrators, teachers, and coaches for the impact evaluation and process study. The previously approved data collection instruments for the impact evaluation and process study include the following: (1) Instruments for Screening and Recruitment of ECE Centers. We do not propose any changes to these materials; (2) Baseline Instruments. Modifications made to surveys remove items that showed little variation in the pilot study, edit item wording to increase clarity and ease of understanding, and add a few new items to capture new constructs of interest based upon the insights gained from the pilot study. The child assessment and classroom observation instruments have been updated to reflect the selected assessments and observations. We added an additional time point of data collection (baseline) for teacher reports on questions about children in the classroom and have added in questions about children's academic skills. Parent/guardian reports to questions about children have been added to gather information about children's skills at the beginning of the impact evaluation and process study. Administrator/teacher COVID-19 supplemental survey questions have been added to gather information about how the pandemic has changed typical center and classroom programming and functioning, if there is a need to contextualize findings from the impact evaluation and process study due to circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic at the time of data collection; (3) Follow-Up Instruments. Modifications made to surveys remove items that showed little variation in the pilot study, edit item wording to increase clarity and ease of understanding, and add a few new items to capture new constructs of interest based upon insights gained from the pilot study. The child assessment and classroom observation instruments have been updated to reflect the selected assessments and observations. We added in questions about children's academic skills to the teacher reports on questions about children in the classroom. Parent/guardian reports to questions about children have been added to gather information about children's skills at the end of the impact evaluation and process study; and (4) Fidelity of Implementation Instruments. Modifications to the Coach Log have been made to remove or consolidate items that showed little variation or proved less useful in the pilot study and to edit item wording to increase clarity and ease of understanding. *Respondents:*
                     Staff members working in Head Start grantee and community-based child care oversight agencies, staff members working in about 140 ECE centers in about 12 metropolitan areas across the United States, and parents and children being served in these centers.
                    ( print page 544) Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of
                             respondents 
                             (total over 
                             request 
                             period)
Number of
                             responses per 
                             respondent 
                             (total over 
                             request 
                             period)
Average
                             burden per 
                             response 
                             (in hours)
Total burden
                             (in hours)
Annual burden
                             (in hours)**Instruments for Screening and Recruitment of ECE Centers for the Impact Evaluation and Process Study**Landscaping protocol with stakeholder agencies (staff burden in Head Start (HS) 
                            *grantee*
                             and community-based child care 
                            *agencies*)
120
1
1.50
180
60Screening protocol for phone calls (staff burden in HS 
                            *grantees*
                             and community-based child care 
                            *agencies*)
132
1
2.0
264
88Screening protocol for phone calls (HS and community-based child care 
                            *center*
                             staff burden)
336
1
1.2
403
134Protocol for follow-up calls/in-person visits for screening and recruitment activities (staff burden in HS 
                            *grantees*
                             and community-based child care 
                            *agencies*)
610
1
1.5
915
305Protocol for follow-up calls/in-person visits for screening and recruitment activities (HS and community-based child care 
                            *center*
                             staff burden)
950
1
1.2
1,140
380**Baseline Instruments for the Impact Evaluation and Process Study**Baseline administrator survey
175
1
0.6
105
35Baseline coach survey
59
1
0.6
35
12Baseline teacher/assistant teacher survey
1,050
1
0.6
630
210Baseline parent/guardian information form
6,300
1
0.1
630
210Baseline classroom observation protocol (teacher burden)
420
1
0.3
126
42Baseline protocol for child assessments (child burden)
4,200
1
0.5
2,100
700Parent/guardian reports to questions about children (administered as part of the baseline parent/guardian information form)
6,300
1
0.1
630
210Teacher reports to questions about children in classroom (administered as part of the baseline teacher survey)
420
10
0.17
714
238Administrator/teacher COVID-19 supplemental survey questions (administered as part of or in addition to administrator and/or teacher survey, to contextualize findings from impact evaluation and process study due to circumstances surrounding COVID-19 at the time of data collection)
980
1
0.25
245
82**Follow-Up Instruments for Impact Evaluation and Process Study**Follow-up administrator survey
140
1
0.5
70
23Follow-up coach survey
47
1
0.5
24
8Follow-up teacher/assistant teacher survey
840
1
0.75
630
210Parent/guardian reports to questions about children
6,300
1
0.1
630
210Teacher reports to questions about children in classroom (administered as part of the follow-up teacher survey)
420
10
0.17
714
238Follow-up classroom observation protocol (teacher burden)
420
3
0.3
378
126Follow-up protocol for child assessments (child burden)
4,200
1
0.9
3,780
1,260**Fidelity of Implementation Instruments for the Process Study**Coach log
47
108
0.25
1,269
423Teacher/assistant teacher log
840
36
0.25
7,560
2,520Implementation fidelity observation protocol (teacher burden)
80
1
0.3
24
8Interview/Focus group protocol (administrator, teacher/assistant teacher and coach burden)
236
1
1.5
354
118*Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*
                         7,850.
 *Comments:*
                     The Department specifically requests comments on (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted within 60 days of this publication. 
 
 (Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9858(a)(5); 42 U.S.C. 9835; and 42 U.S.C. 9844) Mary B. Jones, ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.


[FR Doc. 2020-29230 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-23-P