alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY

                           EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                   Form 10-Q

                   (In Thousands, except earnings per share)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Third Quarter         Nine Months
                                              -----------------   -------------------
                                                1997     1996       1997        1996
                                              -------   -------   --------    ------- 
<S>                                           <C>       <C>       <C>         <C>
Income available for common stock dividends   $44,171   $24,807   $134,666    $13,984 

Primary average common shares outstanding      58,907    36,319     58,285     35,667
Primary earnings per share                    $0.7498   $0.6830    $2.3105    $0.3921   

Fully diluted average common shares
  outstanding                                  59,068    37,306     58,473     36,603  
Fully diluted earnings per common share       $0.7478   $0.6650    $2.3030    $0.3820
</TABLE>
DEVAL L. PATRICK

Governor TIMOTHY P. MURRAY Lieutenant Governor April 4, 2008 Mr . Robert Varney, Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region I One Congress Street Boston, MA Dear Mr . Varney: IAN A . BOWLES Secretary LAURIE BURT Commissioner

Enclosed please find the Massachusetts Certification ofState Implementation Plan Adequacy Regarding Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and (2)for PM2 .S. This certification reaffirms the ability and authority ofthe Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) to implement, maintain and enforce the 1997 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for PM2.5. MassDEP prepared this certification pursuant to the October 2, 2007 U .S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Guidance. According to the EPA Guidance, to the extent that existing SIPS for ozone and particulate matter already meet the requirements of Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and (2), states need only certify that fact to EPA . MassDEP submitted its certification with respect to the ozone NAAQS on December 14, 2007. With respect to particulate matter, Massachusetts submitted its original SIP in 1971 and has revised the SIP numerous times since then to incorporate revised NAAQS and other EPArequirements. The existing Massachusetts SIP meets the Clean Air Act Section I 10(a)(1) and (2) requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. If you have questions with respect to our certification of legal authority, please contact Margaret Stolfa, MassDEP's General Counsel, or with respect to the overall Massachusetts PM2.5 certification, contact Barbara Kwetz, BWP Planning &Evaluation Division Director .

Enclosures. Cc: Carl Dierker, EPA-Region 1, OGC

This information is available in alternate format. Call Donald M . Gomes, ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057. TDD Service - 1-800-298-2207 . 

### COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500

MassDEPon the World Wide Web: http ://www .mass.gov/dep £'a Printed on Recycled Paper
<PAGE>

                                                Exhibit 23




                                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                           Arthur Andersen LLP


<PAGE>



                                                           Exhibit 23




                                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Hurco Companies, Inc.
Indianapolis, Indiana



   
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated  December 5, 1996,  except with respect to the matter  discussed in
Note 4 as to which the date is January  22,  1997,  included  in this Form 10-K,
into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement File No. 2-71597.
    






                                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP




Indianapolis, Indiana
January 24, 1997
§ 536.127 Proper claimants; unknown accused—under the UCMJ. ( a ) A proper claimant under this subpart includes any individual (whether civilian or military), a business, charity, or state or local government that owns, has an ownership interest in, or lawfully possesses property.
( b ) When cognizable claims are presented against a unit because the individual offenders cannot be identified, this subpart sets forth the procedures for approval authorities to direct pay assessments, equivalent to the amount of damages sustained, against the unit members who were present at the scene and to allocate individual liability in such proportion as is just under the circumstances.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard M. Haddock, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Drexler Technology
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

        (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

        (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 11, 2004

/s/ Richard M. Haddock
----------------------
Richard M. Haddock
Co-Chief Executive Officer
(Co-Principal Executive Officer)


                                       50
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                      29,752,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,983,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,905,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,400,000
<INVENTORY>                                 51,701,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            98,980,000
<PP&E>                                     239,122,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             126,588,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             234,121,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       93,830,000
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,521,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               234,121,000
<SALES>                                    393,600,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           393,600,000
<CGS>                                      292,568,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              292,568,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           111,297,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,091,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,356,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,356,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,356,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.50)


</TABLE>
### §1765c. Performance of functions in foreign localities

Each United States Agricultural Trade Office shall carry out its functions under section 1765b of this title in the nation where the United States Agricultural Trade Office is located and in such other nations as the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the Secretary of State, may prescribe in order to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title VI, §605C, as added Pub. L. 95–501, title IV, §401(1), Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1690.)
Order filed May 9, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-12-00019-CR

__________

RICKEY ELLISON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 331st District Court

Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-DC-09-900320

O R D E R

This appeal has been unduly stalled due to the failure of Appellant’s retained

counsel, Alexander L. Calhoun, to file an appellate brief. The brief was originally 

due on December 31, 2012. On January 18, counsel filed a motion for extension, 

which this court granted and which extended the deadline to March 1, 2013. We 
2

have had no further communication from counsel. More than two months have 

passed since the extended deadline, and counsel has yet to file a brief. 

By this order, Alexander L. Calhoun is ORDERED to file in this court a 

brief on behalf of Appellant on or before May 24, 2013. 

PER CURIAM

May 9, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
ENCLOSURE 3
**RECORD OF HEA RING A**  **ND SUMMA RY OF TESTIMONY** 
As required by 40 CFR 51.102(e), the complete record of the hearing, along with a list of witnesses and the text of the written presentations or summary of the oral presentations, is located at t he Office of Air Regulatory Development of the Department of Environmental Quality. The Department contact to access this information is the Director, Office of Air Regulatory Development. As required by Section 2.1(h) of Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 51, be low is a summary of the testimony received and responses thereto. Included is a brief statement of the subject, the identification of the commenter, the summary of the comment and the response (analysis and action taken). Each issue is discussed in light of all of the comments received that affect that issue. All comments have been reviewed and responses developed based on an evaluation of the issues raised in consideration of the overall goals and objectives of the air quality program and the intended p urpose of the document under review. 1. **SUBJECT :**  Sulfur dioxide reductions **COMMENTER :**  USDA Forest Service **TEXT :**  The commenter reviewed the permit conditions and agrees with the department's recommendations. The sulfur dioxide emissions reductio ns, especially those from adding a scrubber to Boiler 4, will make a big difference at nearby James River Face W ilderness. Not only will visibility improve, but sulfur deposition will be reduced. **RESPONSE :**  Support for the proposal is appreciated.

TE MPLATES \ SOURCE
- SPECIFIC \ PLN03 SRCESPEC \ G
- P BIG ISLAND \ GPBI
- SIP
- 3.DOC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,593,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,864,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,673,188
<PP&E>                                     109,501,515
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,876,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,626,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,733,818
<BONDS>                                     52,400,131<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        300
<COMMON>                                     1,511,084
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,281,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,626,542
<SALES>                                     28,351,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,622,174
<CGS>                                        9,150,742<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,150,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,067,920<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,066,602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                336,910
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            336,910
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (2,134,764)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,258,696)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
<FN>
<F1>14 7/8% SENIOR SECURED NOTES DUE 2002.
<F2>OIL & GAS PRODUCTION COSTS & GAS PLANT COSTS
<F3>EXPLORATION, DD&A, G&A AND OTHER
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 2003.6 Voting (Article VI). ( a ) *Motions.* When the Panel is required to make a decision or recommendation to resolve a matter before it, the Chair requests or accepts a motion for a vote. Any member, including the Chair, may make a motion for a vote. No second is required to bring any motion to a vote. A quorum must be present when a vote is taken.
( b ) *Eligibility.* Only the member, including the Chair, may vote on a motion before the ISCAP, with each represented member organization having one vote.
( c ) *Voting procedures at meetings.* Votes are ordinarily taken and tabulated by a show of hands.
( d ) *Passing a motion.* In response to a motion, members may vote affirmatively, negatively, or abstain from voting. A motion passes when it receives a majority of affirmative votes of the members voting. In circumstances in which members abstain from voting, a Panel decision to reverse an agency's classification decision requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the members present.
( e ) *Votes in a non-meeting context.* The Chair may call for a vote of the membership outside the context of a formal ISCAP meeting. An alternate member may also participate in such a vote if the primary member cannot be present. The Executive Secretary records and retains such votes in a documentary form and immediately reports the results to the Chair and other primary or alternate members, including all notes of concurrence or dissent. If a member expresses dissent to taking a non-meeting vote, any member may request the Chair call a meeting of the members to discuss the issue under consideration and to hold an in-person vote.
#### STATE v. SEXTON

No. 543P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 558

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1998.
§ 634.7 Stopping and inspecting personnel or vehicles. ( a ) Government vehicles may be stopped by law enforcement personnel on military installations based on the installation commander's policy. ( 1 ) In overseas areas, Government vehicles may be stopped on or off installations as determined by host nation agreement and command policy.
( 2 ) Stops and inspections of vehicles at installation gates or entry points and in restricted areas will be conducted according to command policy.
( b ) Stops and inspections of POVs within the military installation, other than at restricted areas or at an installation gate, are authorized only when there is a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, or of a violation of a traffic regulation or of the installation commander's policy. Marine Corps users will be guided by publication of Marine Corps order and Military Rules of Evidence 311-316 and local command regulations. DLA users, see DLAR 5700.7.
( c ) At the time of stop, the driver and occupants may be required to display all pertinent documents, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) DD Form 2A.
( 2 ) Documents that establish the identity and status of civilians; for example, Common Access Card (CAC), DD Form 1173 (Uniformed Services Identification and Privilege Card), DA Form 1602 (Civilian Identification), AF Form 354 (Civilian Identification Card), DD Form 2 (Armed Forces of the United States Identification Card), post pass, national identity card, or other identification.
( 3 ) Proper POV registration documents.
( 4 ) Host nation vehicle registration documents, if applicable.
( 5 ) Authorization to operate a Government vehicle, if applicable.
( 6 ) Drivers license or OF 346 valid for the particular vehicle and area of operation.
( 7 ) Proof of insurance.
"EXHIBIT 21"

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                Subsidiaries of International Bancshares Corporation

        NAME                         BUSINESS                 % OF OWNERSHIP

IBC Subsidiary Corporation           Bank Holding Company          100%
IBC Life Insurance Company           Credit Life Insurance         100%
IBC Trading Company                  Export Trading                100%
IBC Capital Corporation              Investments                   100%


                   Subsidiaries of IBC Subsidiary Corporation

        NAME                         BUSINESS                 % OF OWNERSHIP

International Bank of Commerce       State Bank                    100%
Commerce Bank                        State Bank                    100%
International Bank of Commerce,
  Zapata                             State Bank                    100%
International Bank of Commerce,
  Brownsville                        State Bank                    100%
#### M. A. Cremer *vs.*Joseph Wimmer and Wife.

May 24, 1889.

Action by Agent in his Own líame for his Principal. — Where a con tract has been taken by an agent in his own name, although for the bene fit of his principal, lie-is a “trustee of an express trust,” within the mean ing of Gen. St. 1878, *e.*66, § 28, and may sue in his own name.

Appeal by plaintiff from a j udgment of the municipal court of St. Paul.

*H. C. McCartey,*for appellant,

*Gebhard Willrich,*for respondents.

Mitchell, J.

Action for damages for the non-performance of a contract for the sale of land. Taking the complaint and reply together, and waiving a discrepancy in dates not here important, they show the following facts: Defendant Joseph Wimmer employed plaintiff as his agent to sell the land in question, agreeing to pay him as commission, in case he found a purchaser, all that was obtained by plaintiff over $900. Plaintiff found a purchaser, one Engel, at $1,000, and so reported to defendants, who thereupon executed to him a contract, by which they sold and agreed to convey to plaintiff personally for $900. Assuming that in taking this contract plaintiff was Engel’s agent, and that although in the name of the former it *512was made for the benefit of the latter, yet under Gen. St. 1878, *c.*66, § 28, plaintiff might sue in his own name; for while he was not technically what would at common law have been called “a trustee of an express trust,” yet the statute referred to expressly provides that this term shall include “a person with whom or in whose name a contract is made for the benefit of another.” The court therefore erred in dismissing the action on the pleadings.

Judgment reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                            <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1996 
<CASH>                                              196,271 
<SECURITIES>                                              0       
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4,333,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (140,000)
<INVENTORY>                                       5,882,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10,909,318
<PP&E>                                            2,672,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (1,375,823)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   12,433,032 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9,389,950
<BONDS>                                                   0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0   
<COMMON>                                            105,539   
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,509,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     12,433,032
<SALES>                                           6,055,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6,055,707
<CGS>                                             5,031,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5,031,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,002,056  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  181,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (159,722)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (159,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0 
<CHANGES>                                                 0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       (159,722)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.18)
        

</TABLE>