alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10QSB AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1995             FEB-28-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1995             MAR-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995             FEB-28-1995
<CASH>                                         102,500                 328,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,791,900               1,949,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                   246,900                 206,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,537,200               6,588,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,616,500               9,087,866
<PP&E>                                       1,165,300                 711,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 416,000                 347,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,514,100               9,665,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,663,100               3,392,774
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       473,800                 468,824
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,452,200               4,803,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,514,100               9,665,378
<SALES>                                     14,607,900              12,479,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,607,900              12,479,907
<CGS>                                        6,065,500               5,629,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,272,600               9,873,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               598,500                 706,351
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,000                  58,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             204,400                   9,952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,487,400               1,831,786
<INCOME-TAX>                                   974,000                 660,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,513,400               1,171,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,513,400               1,171,786
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57                     .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57                     .45
        

</TABLE>
### §4404. Repealed or Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was comprised of section 8 of act Mar. 8, 1946, ch. 82, 60 Stat. 45, as amended. Subsections (a) to (c) of section 8 of act Mar. 8, 1946, were repealed by Pub. L. 101–225, title III, §307(12), Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1925. Subsection (d) of section 8 of act Mar. 8, 1946, was redesignated as and transferred to section 56308 of Title 46, Shipping, by Pub. L. 115–91, div. C, title XXXV, §3502(a)(2), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1910.

Section was formerly classified to section 1741 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### Stephan Vos, Appellant, v. Eugene J. Fisher, Doing Business as Fisher Marine Co., Respondent.

Amended judgment dismissing the complaint in a personal injury action during the course of the trial, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, decision was reserved on a motion to dismiss. However, in the course of defendant’s case, the trial court granted the motion. We hold that the plaintiff’s proof was sufficient to present a prima facie case that Williams was acting within the scope of his employment for defendant at the time of the occurrence of the accident. Whether the alleged negligence occurred at a time when the employee was *664acting within the scope of his employment is a question of fact for the jury *(Burns*v. *City of New York,*6 A D 2d 30, 35). It was error, therefore, to dismiss the complaint in the course of the trial. 'Concur — Botein, P. J., Val ente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
### §4506. Regulations

The Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations and instructions under which the awards programs set forth by this subchapter shall be carried out.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 443; Pub. L. 95–454, title V, §503(d), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1184; Pub. L. 97–35, title XVII, §1703(b)(2), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 756; Pub. L. 107–67, title VI, §641(b), Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 555.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 2121 (1st 29 words). | Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1208, §302 (1st 29 words), 68 Stat. 1112. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Pub. L. 107–67 substituted "the awards programs" for "the agency awards program".

1981—Pub. L. 97–35 substituted "subchapter" for "chapter".

1978—Pub. L. 95–454 substituted "Office of Personnel Management shall" for "Civil Service Commission may".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2001 Amendment

Pub. L. 107–67, title VI, §641(d), Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 555, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting section 4507a of this title and amending this section] shall take effect for awards granted in 2003."

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–35 effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 1703(c) of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as a note under section 4501 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Pub. L. 95–454, title V, §504(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1184, provided that amendment by Pub. L. 95–454 was effective on first day of first applicable pay period which began on or after Oct. 1, 1981, except it could take effect with respect to any category or categories of positions before such day to extent prescribed by Director of Office of Personnel Management.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Ben D. Hare, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Panhandle Royalty Company(the Company);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have: a).  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b).  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c).  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d).  Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors: a).  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b).  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   /s/ Ben D. Hare   Ben D. Hare  Chief Operating Officer  Date: December 12, 2006
#### *Heyman *vs.*The State of Georgia.

[Wabkeb, Chief Justice, being engaged as presiding officer of the senate organized as-a court of impeachment, did not sit in this case.]

This case is ruled hy the case of *Newman vs. The State,*decided at this-term.

*

No reports or opinions are published in the following cases under the provisions of act of March 2, 1875. (R.)

Jackson, Justice.
# C_2008008EN.01001201.xml

| 12.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/12

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 November 2007 — Ianniello v Commission

(Case T-308/04) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Career evaluation report - 2001/2002 evaluation period - Action for annulment - Action for damages)

(2008/C 8/21)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Francesco Ianniello (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the applicant's career evaluation report for the 2001/2002 evaluation period and payment of compensation for the non-material suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision adopting the applicant's career evaluation report for the 2001/2002 evaluation period; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision adopting the applicant's career evaluation report for the 2001/2002 evaluation period;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of the applicant.

---

(1)  OJ C 262 of 23.10 2004.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.408 Plan of notification required. ( a ) *Manufacturer's plan required.* Except as provided in § 3282.407, if a manufacturer determines that it is responsible for providing notification under § 3282.405, the manufacturer must prepare a plan in accordance with this section and § 3282.409. The manufacturer must, as soon as practical, but not later than 20 days after making the determination of defect, serious defect, or imminent safety hazard, submit the plan for approval to one of the following, as appropriate: ( 1 ) The SAA of the State of manufacture, when all of the manufactured homes covered by the plan were manufactured in that State; or
( 2 ) The Secretary, when the manufactured homes were manufactured in more than one State or there is no SAA in the State of manufacture.
( b ) *Implementation of plan.* Upon approval of the plan, including any changes for cause required by the Secretary or SAA after consultation with the manufacturer, the manufacturer must carry out the approved plan within the agreed time limits.
#### Edward Cranmer, Respondent, v. John G. Grozine, Appellant.

On the call of the calendar, appeal dismissed. There was no appearance for appellant, and appellant failed to comply with an order of this court, dated April 12, 1962, requiring him to perfect his appeal for the June 1962 Term. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-150-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

AFM TR 

Incorporation 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 959 $81,515.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $81,515

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
MOSS ADAMS LLP
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS                  438 First Street, Suite 320
                                              Santa Rosa, CA 95401-6339
              
                                              Phone 707-527-0800
                                              Fax 707-575-1712
                          
                                              Offices in Principal Cities of
                                              Washington, Oregon and California


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
   Healthy Planet Products, Inc.


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
Healthy  Planet  Products,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.  33-84740)  of our report
dated February 7, 1997, on our audits of the financial  statements and financial
statement schedules of Healthy Planet Products, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and
1995,  and for each of the two fiscal  years in the period  ended  December  31,
1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.




                                         /s/ Moss Adams LLP


Santa Rosa, California
March 24, 1997


A member of
Moores Rowland
INTERNATIONAL
An association of independent
accounting firms throughout the world.
### §1929b. Purchase of guaranteed portions of loans; terms and conditions; exercise of authorities

The Secretary may purchase, on such terms and conditions as the Secretary deems appropriate, the guaranteed portion of any loan guaranteed under this chapter: Provided, That the Secretary may not pay for any such guaranteed portion of a loan in excess of an amount equal to the unpaid principal balance and accrued interest on the guaranteed portion of the loan. The Secretary may use for such purchases funds from the Rural Development Insurance Fund with respect to rural development loans as defined in section 1929a(a) of this title and funds from the Agricultural Credit Insurance Fund with respect to all other loans under this chapter. This authority may be exercised only if the Secretary determines that an adequate secondary market is not available in the private sector.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §309B, as added Pub. L. 95–334, title I, §111, Aug. 4, 1978, 92 Stat. 424.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.
### §1736g–3. Use of certain local currency

Local currency payments received by the United States pursuant to agreements entered into under subchapter II (as in effect on November 27, 1990) may be utilized by the Secretary in accordance with section 1708 of this title (as in effect on November 27, 1990).

(July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title IV, §416, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title II, §223, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 958.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1708 of this title (as in effect on November 27, 1990), referred to in text, was omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1512, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3633.
CITY COUNCIL 

Geoff Dale - Mayor 

Mark Gran - Mayor Pro - rem 

Doug Cox - Council Member 

Rick Breland - Council Member 

Retty Sampson - COt)n(iI Merr'ther 

ClTYCUHK 

Df'bra Jackson 

CITY TREASUREH 

StacC'y(ox 

November 4, 2010 

Dennis DeVanny 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

INCORPORATED 1904 

Subject: Docket OST-2008-0299 - EAS at EI Centro/Imperial, California 

Dear Mr. DeVanny: 

CITY HAll 

420 South Imperial Avenue 

Imperial, California 92251 

City Hall (760) 355-4371 

f'ilx (760) 355-4718 

(lTY ATTOHNfY 

Dennis Morita 

Dennis fLMorita APC. 

Ul 

On behalf of myself and the City Council of the City of Imperial, I would like to take this time to thank 

you for the opportunity to provide comments regarding the EI Centro/Imperial, California Essential 

Airline Service proposal. Furthermore, I would also like to thank you for the two time extensions 

granted by your office while we reviewed the best option for the constituents of my community. 

At our Regular meeting of November 3, 2010, this City Council voted 3-1 to request that the carrierselection decision that you issue goes to Seaport. Comments by Council expressed a preference to this 

airline due to greater responsiveness in flight scheduling requests, less expensive airfares, the 

opportunity for local community involvement and support, willingness to station aircraft locally and 

better opportunity to meet the needs of our region. 

The City Council of the City of Imperial values the air service at the Imperial County Airport and supports 

Seaport Airlines. The City of Imperial waives the assurances of a 15 passenger twin engine aircraft for 

purposes of this two year contract period to allow for operation of Seaport Airlines during this time. 

Thank you again for the opportunity to provide comments. Should you have any questions regarding 

this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me or City Manager Marlene Best at (760) 355-4373. 

~2-- Geoff Dale 

Mayor, City of Imperial
Appeal No. 76-455.

#### Rhode Island Lung Association *et al. v.*Dr. Joseph P. Cannon *et al.*

*Thomas C. Mullaney, Harold R. Ward,*for petitioner.

*Thomas J. Grady,*for defendant.

The motion for special assignment is denied.
EXHIBIT 10.7
                                                                    ------------

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

         THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into
effective as of December 30, 2005, by and between TREY RESOURCES, INC., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP, a
Delaware limited partnership (the "Investor").

                                    Recitals:

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Investor entered into an Equity Line of
Credit Agreement (the "Equity Line of Credit Agreement"); a Registration Rights
Agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement"); an Escrow Agreement (the
"Escrow Agreement"); and a Placement Agent Agreement (the "Placement Agent
Agreement"), all of which are dated January 27, 2005 (collectively, the Equity
Line of Credit Agreement, the Registration Rights Agreement, the Escrow
Agreement and Placement Agent Agreement are referred to as the "Transaction
Documents").

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual
promises, conditions and covenants contained herein and in the Transaction
Documents and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

          1.   Termination. Each of the parties to this Agreement hereby
               terminate the Transaction Documents and the respective rights and
               obligations contained therein. As a result of this provision,
               none of the parties shall have any rights or obligations under or
               with respect to the Transaction Documents.

          2.   Structuring Fees. The Investor shall retain all structuring
                  fees.

          3.   Fees. The Investor shall retain any and all fees previously paid
               under the Transaction Documents.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed and delivered this
Termination Agreement on the date first set forth above.

TREY RESOURCES, INC.                          CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP

By: ____________________                      By: Yorkville Advisors, LLC
Name: Mark Meller                             Its: General Partner
Title: President & CEO
                                              By: ____________________
                                              Name: Mark A. Angelo
                                              Title: Portfolio Manager