alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §321. The National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center

#### (a) Definition

In this section, the term "National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center" means the National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center established under section 5195c(d) of title 42.

#### (b) Authority

#### (1) In general

There is in the Department the National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center which shall serve as a source of national expertise to address critical infrastructure protection and continuity through support for activities related to—

(A) counterterrorism, threat assessment, and risk mitigation; and

(B) a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster.

#### (2) Infrastructure modeling

#### (A) Particular support

The support provided under paragraph (1) shall include modeling, simulation, and analysis of the systems and assets comprising critical infrastructure, in order to enhance preparedness, protection, response, recovery, and mitigation activities.

#### (B) Relationship with other agencies

Each Federal agency and department with critical infrastructure responsibilities under Homeland Security Presidential Directive 7, or any successor to such directive, shall establish a formal relationship, including an agreement regarding information sharing, between the elements of such agency or department and the National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center, through the Department.

#### (C) Purpose

#### (i) In general

The purpose of the relationship under subparagraph (B) shall be to permit each Federal agency and department described in subparagraph (B) to take full advantage of the capabilities of the National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center (particularly vulnerability and consequence analysis), consistent with its work load capacity and priorities, for real-time response to reported and projected natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters.

#### (ii) Recipient of certain support

Modeling, simulation, and analysis provided under this subsection shall be provided to relevant Federal agencies and departments, including Federal agencies and departments with critical infrastructure responsibilities under Homeland Security Presidential Directive 7, or any successor to such directive.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title V, §511, as added Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §611(13), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 321, Pub. L. 107–296, title V, §510, as added Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, §7303(d), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3844, related to urban and other high risk area communications capabilities, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §611(5), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1395.
#### Sylvester Kipp and another *vs.*Hortense Hill and Husband.

February 20, 1889.

Taxes — Sale to State — Certificate Void unless Seasonably Made. — A certificate issued to the state for lands bid in at a tax sale, made out and executed by the county auditor months after the expiration of the time reasonably needed for such purpose, although within the period of redemption provided in Laws 1874, c. 1, is of no effect. Following *Stewart*v. *Minn. <& St. Louis liy. Go.,*36 Minn. 355, and *Gilflll'an*v. *Chatterton,*37 Minn. 11.

Action to determine adverse claims to land in Eamsey county, brought in the district court for that county, in October, 1887, and tried by *Kelly,*J., who ordered judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal from an order refusing a new trial. It was agreed that the plaintiffs were owners of the land unless their title had been divested by the tax sale mentioned in the opinion, under which the defendant Hortense, as assignee of the right acquired by the state, claimed title.

*E. S. Chittenden,*for appellants.

*S. é 0. Kipp,*for respondents.

Collins, J.

The land involved in this action was bid in by the state at a tax sale held December 22,1874. On November IS, 1876, the state assigned its right and interest to one Langelier, from whom, through intermediate conveyances, the defendant Hortense Hill claims title. The certificate of sale required by Laws 1874, *e.*1, § 124, was not 'made out until the day of the assignment to Langelier, almost two years after.the day of the tax sale in 1874. The trial court found as a fact that the auditor making the sale could have, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, in addition to performing all other official duties, caused to be prepared, and could have executed, all certificates provided for in said section 124, within eight weeks from and after the day of sale, December 22, 1874, and that said period of eight weeks was all the time reasonably necessary within which to prepare and execute all said certificates. It is laid down in *Stewart*v. *Minn. & St. Louis Ry. Co.,*36 Minn. 355, (31 N. W. Rep. 351,) *189and reaffirmed in *Gilfillan v. Chatterton,*37 Minn. 11, (33 N. W. Rep. 35,) that these certificates must be executed within a reasonable time after the sale. The views of this court, clearly expressed in each of those cases, foreclose all argument upon the proposition that this need not be done for months after a reasonable and necessary period of time has elapsed.

Order affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JAQUAN GAMBOA, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ERIKA D. BALLOU, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest. No. 84139 

# FILE

ORDER DENYING PETITION This petition for a writ of mandamus seeks an order directing the district court to set reasonable bail. We conclude that extraordinary relief is not warranted because petitioner has not met his substantial burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the relief requested. NRS 34.160; Walker v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev. 678, 680-81, 476 P.3d 1194, 1196-97 (2020) (recognizing the petitioner's substantial burden to demonstrate a clear legal right to a particular course of action where the court is entrusted with discretion on the issue); Poulos v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 98 Nev. 453, 455, 652 P.2d 1177, 1178 (1982) (recognizing that it is within this court's discretion whether to issue a writ of mandamus); Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603-04, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981) (recognizing that a writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an action which the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion). Here, the district court conducted a hearing on petitioner's motion to set reasonable bail and entered written



## Z2-osS-0.3 SUPREME COURT OF NEvADA

(0) 1947A 446Plofindings addressing the relevant statutory factors. Valdez-Jimenez v.

Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev. 155, 164-66, 460 P.3d 976, 986-87 (2020). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.'



## Ai4G4i1 , J. Stiglich Sr.J.

cc: Hon. Erika D. Ballou, District Judge The Law Firm of C. Benjamin Scroggins, Esq. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.

2
#### Marie L. Fetsch et al., Appellants, v. Village of Sands Point et al., Respondents.

Motion to dispense with the printing of an exhibit, to wit, a prior record on appeal on file in this court, granted. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 000300tp
- 00040000
- 00050000
- 00060000
- 00070001
- 00080002
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110000
- 00120000
- 00130003
- 00140004
- 00150000
- 00160000
- 00170005
- 00180006
- 001900bi
- 002000bc
#### POSTELL v. S & N COMMUNICATIONS

No. 524P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 209

Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 December 1997.
#### § 536.51 Collateral source rule.

Where permitted by applicable state or maritime law, damages recovered from collateral sources are payable under subparts D and H, but not under subparts C, E, F, or J of this part. For further discussion see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-57.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6091

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BILL W. CONARD, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-86-A, CA-97-147-1) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bill W. Conard, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion and his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Conard , Nos. CR-86-A; CA-97-147-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 1997, Nov. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
March 22, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CEDRIC DEWAYNE ROBINSON, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00282-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 28, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 686 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-58, CP2021-60.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2020-29310 Filed 1-6-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit (32)(b)**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Empire District Electric Company(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Gregory A. Knapp, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **By**                                                       | **/s/  Gregory A. Knapp** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|------------|
| Name: Gregory A. Knapp                                       |                      |
| Title: Vice President - Finance and Chief  Financial Officer |                      |

 

Date:       August 5, 2010

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to The Empire District ElectricCompany and will be retained by The Empire District Electric Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1369 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1369

Remembering the life of Corey Comperatore who passed away on Saturday, 
                             July 13, 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2024

 Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, 
      Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Meuser, Mr. 
  Reschenthaler, Mr. Perry, Ms. Houlahan, Mr. Deluzio, Ms. Wild, Mr. 
   Cartwright, Ms. Scanlon, Mr. Evans, Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
   Murphy, Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Smith of 
 Missouri, Mr. Amodei, Mrs. Chavez-DeRemer, Mr. Baird, Ms. Van Duyne, 
 Mrs. Bice, Mr. Steube, Mr. Moylan, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Nunn of Iowa, 
  Mr. Fulcher, Mr. Self, Mr. Huizenga, Mr. Williams of New York, Mr. 
   Weber of Texas, Mr. Banks, Mr. Miller of Ohio, Mr. Armstrong, Mr. 
Alford, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Collins, Mr. Bucshon, Mr. Lawler, Mr. Pence, 
   Mr. Issa, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. Womack, Mr. Pfluger, Mr. Kean of New 
 Jersey, Mr. Walberg, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Aderholt, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Rose, 
Mrs. Miller of West Virginia, Mr. Bilirakis, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. Lamborn, 
  Ms. Letlow, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Yakym, Mr. LaLota, Mr. 
     Hudson, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Feenstra, Mr. Carl, Mr. 
    McCormick, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Gooden of Texas, Mr. Bishop of North 
   Carolina, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Guthrie, and Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                    on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Remembering the life of Corey Comperatore who passed away on Saturday, 
                             July 13, 2024.

Whereas Corey Comperatore was from Sarver, Pennsylvania, leaving behind his 
        wife, Helen, and two daughters, Allyson and Kaylee;
Whereas Corey Comperatore was a respected community leader who dedicated years 
        of service to the Buffalo Township Volunteer Fire Department of Sarver, 
        Pennsylvania;
Whereas Corey Comperatore served his country as a veteran of the United States 
        Army Reserves;
Whereas Corey Comperatore left behind a legacy of service for his country and 
        his community, a devoted member of the Cabot Methodist Church; and
Whereas Corey Comperatore died a hero, protecting his family, shielding his wife 
        and daughter from danger: Now, therefore be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) mourns the loss of Corey Comperatore, a husband, 
        father, volunteer firefighter, community leader, and hero from 
        Sarver, Pennsylvania; and
            (2) commemorates and celebrates the selfless and courageous 
        life of Corey Comperatore;
                                 <all>
```
#### § 243.2 Applicability.

This section governs all contracts with the Department of Defense where awards to the air carriers, either through individual contracts or teaming arrangements, are commensurate with the relative amount of airlift capability committed to the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF).
<PAGE>




EXHIBIT 3.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      STATE OR JURISDICTION OF
                                                          INCORPORATION OR                          NAME UNDER WHICH
          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT                        ORGANIZATION                        SUBSIDIARIES DO BUSINESS
<S>                                                   <C>                                    <C>
1.) Potomac Energy (BVI), Ltd.                        Tortola, British Virgin Islands        Potomac (BVI), Ltd.
2.) Magdalena Energia, LLC                            Texas                                  Magdalena Energia
3.) Carbones De Guaduas, Ltd.                         Bogota, Colombia                       Carbones De Guaduas
4.) Potomac Exploration Acquisition Corporation       Oklahoma                               Potomac Exploration Acquisition
                                                                                             Corporation
</TABLE>







                                       31
#### James F. Stepina et al., appellees, v. Charles P. R. Macaulay et al., defendants. Charles P. R. Macaulay, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,766.

Order confirming report of master in chancery of sale of real estate pursuant to decree of court. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles M. Foell, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924. *Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 11, 1925.

Walter B. Prendergast, for appellant.

Wyman, Hopkins, MeKeever & Colbert, for appellees; Vincent D. Wyman and Austin L. Wyman, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this
Quarterly Report of EDO Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 25, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ JAMES M. SMITH
                                                -----------------------
                                                James M. Smith
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                October 29, 2004

                                                /s/ FREDERIC B. BASSETT
                                                -----------------------
                                                Frederic B. Bassett
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                October 29, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6616
MICHAEL ALLEN KOKOSKI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES FELTS, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (5:06-cv-00605) Submitted: August 6, 2007 Decided: August 17, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Allen Kokoski, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Allen Kokoski, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2007) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kokoski v. Felts , No. 5:06-cv-00605 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 12, 2007). We di spense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 99

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 9.4 OF THE PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT (UNAUDITED)


1.  Statement of Cash Available for Distribution:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Three Months
                                                             Year Ended        Ended
                                                             December 31,   December 31,
                                                                 2003          2003
                                                             -----------    -----------
<S>                                                          <C>            <C>
Net income                                                   $ 1,925,000    $ 1,501,000
     Add:  Depreciation and amortization charged to income
             not affecting cash available for distribution       140,000         27,000
           Net proceeds from sale of property                  2,377,000      2,377,000
           Cash from reserves                                    238,000        133,000

     Less: Gain on sale of property                           (1,400,000)    (1,400,000)
                                                             -----------    -----------

           Cash Available for Distribution                   $ 3,280,000    $ 2,638,000
                                                             ===========    ===========

           Distributions allocated to General Partners       $        --    $        --
                                                             ===========    ===========

           Distributions allocated to Limited Partners       $ 3,280,000    $ 2,638,000
                                                             ===========    ===========
</TABLE>

2.  Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
    General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
    December 31, 2003:

Entity Receiving                         Form of
 Compensation                          Compensation                     Amount
 ------------                          ------------                     ------
Winthrop
Management LLC       Property Management Fees                          $   2,000

General Partners     Interest in Cash Available for Distribution       $    -

Affiliates of the
General Partner      Interest in Cash Available for Distribution       $ 591,000