alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4424-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]


Ohio; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Ohio (FEMA-4424-DR), dated April 8, 2019, and related 
determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on December 28, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Joseph Cirone, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Steven W. Johnson as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.


Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-29290 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### § 552.106 Applicability.

This regulation is applicable to all persons, both military and civilian, who enter the Fort Lewis Military Reservation.
#### TANENBAUM, Appellant, v. WHIFFEN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Di*1150vision, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Moses Tanenbaum against Thomas B. Whiffen. L. N. Levi, for appellant. O. C. Sommerich, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
<PAGE>   1
              EXHIBIT 11.1
              
              AMERICAN VANTAGE COMPANIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
              
              SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
              AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT
              
              YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND 1996



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              1997            1996    
                                                           -----------     -----------
<S>                                                      <C>             <C>
                         PRIMARY:
Net income ............................................... $ 4,468,000     $ 3,796,000
                                                           ===========     ===========
Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding during the period ..........................  14,868,000      14,368,000

Add:
  Common stock equivalents (determined
  using the "treasury stock" method) representing
  shares issuable upon exercise of options
  and warrants that are in the money .....................   1,187,000       1,835,000
                                                           -----------     -----------

Weighted average number of shares used in
  calculation of primary income per share ................  16,055,000      16,203,000
                                                           ===========     ===========

PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT .............................. $      0.28      $     0.23
                                                           ===========     ===========

                      FULLY DILUTED

Net income ............................................... $ 4,468,000     $ 3,796,000
                                                           ===========     ===========

Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding during the year ............................  14,868,000      14,368,000

Add:
  Common stock equivalents (determined
  using the "treasury stock" method) representing
  shares issuable upon exercise of options
  and warrants that are in the money .....................   1,187,000         956,000
                                                           -----------     -----------
Weighted average number of shares used in
  calculation of fully diluted per share ................   16,055,000      15,324,000
                                                           ===========     ===========

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT .............................. $      0.28      $     0.25
                                                           ===========     ===========

NOTE: Fully diluted earnings per common share and common share
  equivalent is not presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income
  because the effect is antidilutive or the dilutive effect is less than three percent.

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134819 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134819 

 COA: 270382 

Ionia CC: 05-013053-FH 

WILLIE LEE NASH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1213 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 20, 2007 

 Clerk
#### COOPERATIVE WAREHOUSE, INC. v. CARDINAL CHEMICALS, INC.

No. 240P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 223

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 September 1997. Motion by defendant (Cardinal) to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 September 1997.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1994
<CASH>                                         124,042
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  530,265
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,931
<INVENTORY>                                    159,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               928,030
<PP&E>                                       1,178,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                 630,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,761,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          736,563
<BONDS>                                         86,481
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,905
<OTHER-SE>                                     935,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,761,885
<SALES>                                      1,408,047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,738,750
<CGS>                                          531,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  745,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               232,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,060
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,671
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,053
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            153,618
<DISCONTINUED>                                  16,582
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   170,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
        

</TABLE>
### §1308–4. Education program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall carry out a payment provisions education program for appropriate personnel of the Department of Agriculture and members and other personnel of county and State committees established under section 590h(b) of title 16, for the purpose of fostering more effective and uniform application of the payment limitations and restrictions established under sections 1308 through 1308–3 of this title.

#### (b) Training

The education program shall provide training to the personnel in the fair, accurate, and uniform application to individual farming operations of the provisions of law and regulation relating to the payment provisions of sections 1308 through 1308–3 of this title.

#### (c) Administration

The State office of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service shall make the initial determination concerning the application of payment limitations and restrictions established under sections 1308 through 1308–3 of this title to farm operations consisting of more than 5 persons, subject to review by the Secretary.

#### (d) Commodity Credit Corporation

The Secretary shall carry out the program provided under this section through the Commodity Credit Corporation.

(Pub. L. 99–198, title X, §1001E, formerly §1001D, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XI, §1111(g), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3499; renumbered §1001E, Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1604(1), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 215.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food Security Act of 1985, and not as part of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 which comprises this chapter.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1001E of Pub. L. 99–198 was renumbered section 1001F and is classified to section 1308–5 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective beginning with 1991 crop of an agricultural commodity, with provision for prior crops, see section 1171 of Pub. L. 101–624, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 1421 of this title.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00171-CV

ROSS MANDEL AND LEA MANDEL APPELLANTS

V.

LEWISVILLE INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT; COUNTY OF

DENTON, TEXAS; AND CITY OF

PLANO

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 431ST DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

AND

NO. 02-13-00412-CV

IN RE ROSS MANDEL AND LEA

MANDEL

RELATORS

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

FILE COPY
ORDER

------------

We have considered “Constable Ron Smith’s Motion to Quash Orders to

Show Cause.” The motion is DENIED. In ordering the trial court to conduct a

show-cause hearing as dictated in our February 28, 2014 order, it is our intention

that the trial court will rule on evidentiary matters that arise during the hearing

while allowing for a full record for this court’s consideration.

The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the trial

court judge, the trial court clerk, the attorney of record for each of the parties to

the appeal and the mandamus action, the attorney who filed an amicus brief in

the appeal, and the attorney of record for Constable Ron Smith.

DATED April 11, 2014.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GARDNER and GABRIEL, JJ.

2

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32.1 

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of UQMTechnologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the annual periodended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periodscovered in the Report.

 

| /s/  ERIC      R. RIDENOUR 
Eric R. Ridenour  
President and Chief Executive      Officer                                                                                                                      
 

/s/  DONALD      A. FRENCH 
Donald A. French  
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial      Officer 
 

Dated:  June 1, 2011

 

  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I,
Alan M. Schnaid, certify that:



| | 1) | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Starwood Hotels &
Resorts Worldwide, Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2016



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Schnaid    
|Alan M. Schnaid        
|Chief Financial Officer
### §1781. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–130, §4(a), Nov. 1, 1993, 107 Stat. 1369

Section, acts Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title VII, §702, 68 Stat. 910; Sept. 29, 1977, Pub. L. 95–113, title III, §301, 91 Stat. 921, declared encouragement of continued domestic production of wool to be policy of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Act Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title VII, §701, 68 Stat. 910, provided that title VII of act Aug. 28, 1954 (enacting this chapter) could be cited as the "National Wool Act of 1954", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–130, §3(a), Nov. 1, 1993, 107 Stat. 1369.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

September 18, 2020

Order 

Clerk

September 18, 2020

161597(29)

EARL L. SULLIVAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 161597

v COA: 352985

MICHIGAN REFORMATORY WARDEN,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant for reconsideration 

of the August 17, 2020 order that administratively closed this case is GRANTED. Plaintiffappellant shall have 28 days from the date of this order to file a motion for the temporary 

waiver of fees and a certificate of prisoner account activity for the past twelve months. If 

those documents are timely filed, the case will be re-opened to give plaintiff-appellant the

opportunity to comply with the requirements of MCL 600.2963 and proceed to a decision 

on the merits of his application.
#### STATE v. SADLER

No. 481P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 832

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 November 1997.
--------· -·--**----·---~----------~--·-** ---- . --·-------- ·-**-·---------~-----··-··--- ~-.** **----~** -·



### Writ ofMandamus Denied, Opinion issued January 16, 2013

In 

### The 

## Qtourt of Appeals lf.ifth, 

## ilistrid of IDexas at ilallas No. 05-12-01729-CV
IN RE RODOLFO HERNANDEZ, Relator Original Proceedingfrom the 363rdJudicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial CourtCause No. F12-11218 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Francis, and Murphy Opinion by Justice Francis Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not ruling on his motion for examining trial. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based onthe record beforeus, we conclude relatorhas not shownhe is entitled to the relief requested. See TEx. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318,320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State ofTex. ex rei. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ ofmandamus.

121729F.POS
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Brian D. Fitzgerald, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of
Security Capital Corporation (the 
registrant); 2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this 
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this  report; 4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of these disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)Reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and  5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)All significant deficiencies and weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 31, 2004/s/ Brian D. FitzgeraldBrian D. FitzgeraldPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 900.2 Objectives.

The objective of this part is to provide an introduction to the synopsis of the approved State programs, the Abandoned Mined Lands Reclamation programs, the cross referencing provisions of Federal programs and the full texts of State and Federal cooperative agreements for regulation of mining on Federal lands. The introduction explains the content and authority of the permanent regulatory programs.
(May 18, 1964)

#### In the Matter of Robert F. J. Hanigan, Petitioner, v. County Court of the County of Rockland et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, instituted by petitioner, who is the defendant in a certain criminal action now pending in the County Court, Rockland County: (a) to annul certain orders of said court relating to said action; and (b) to transfer certain pretrial motions and trial of the action to the Supreme Court, Rockland County, the respondents, the said County Court and the District Attorney of Rockland County, severally move to dismiss the petition, pursuant to subdivision (f) of section 7804 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, as insufficient in law; and the petitioner cross-moves to dismiss such motions. The respondents' motions to dismiss the petition are granted; proceeding dismissed. Petitioner’s cross motion is dismissed as academic. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### §1304. Consumer safeguards

The powers conferred under this chapter shall not be used to discourage the production of supplies of foods and fibers sufficient to maintain normal domestic human consumption as determined by the Secretary from the records of domestic human consumption in the years 1920 to 1929, inclusive, taking into consideration increased population quantities of any commodity that were forced into domestic consumption by decline in exports during such period, current trends in domestic consumption and exports of particular commodities, and the quantities of substitutes available for domestic consumption within any general class of food commodities. In carrying out the purposes of this chapter it shall be the duty of the Secretary to give due regard to the maintenance of a continuous and stable supply of agricultural commodities from domestic production adequate to meet consumer demand at prices fair to both producers and consumers.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §304, 52 Stat. 45.)