alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1736u. Cooperator market development program

#### (a) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that the cooperator market development program of the Foreign Agricultural Service should be continued to help develop new markets and expand and maintain existing markets for United States agricultural commodities, using nonprofit agricultural trade organizations to the maximum extent practicable.

#### (b) Exemption from requirements of OMB circular

The cooperator market development program shall be exempt from the requirements of Circular A 110 issued by the Office of Management and Budget.

(Pub. L. 99–198, title XI, §1126(a), (b), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1482.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section consists of subsecs. (a) and (b) of section 1126 of Pub. L. 99–198. Subsec. (c) of section 1126 amended section 1736m(a)(5)(B) of this title.

Section was enacted as part of the Food Security Act of 1985, and not as part of the Food for Peace Act which comprises this chapter.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert O. Rossi, Appellant.

Motion by respondent to amend or resettle the order and the opinion or decision of this court, made on July 5, 1961 *(People*v. Rossi, 14 A D 2d 558) so as to indicate definitely that our reversal was on the law alone and not on the facts. Motion granted; the order and decision are resettled accordingly; and the decision is amended by striking out the statement therein that “Under all the circumstances, it is our opinion that a new trial is required in the interests of justice.” Appellant in his brief in this court raised only questions of law. This court’s decision reversing the judgment *651and directing a new trial was based on questions of law only. Precisely as stated in said order and decision, the facts were not considered by this court. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 1626 New York
Associates Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                  2,701,000 
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                             189,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              (85,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<PP&E>                                100,685,000
<DEPRECIATION>                        (51,925,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         65,033,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           0
<BONDS>                               169,231,000 <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                           (107,915,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           65,033,000
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       48,481,000 <F3>
<CGS>                                           0       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          23,418,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     23,208,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,379,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,379,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        36,156,000
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                           37,535,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           28,490.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                           28,490.30
<FN>
<F1>
Cash includes $2,410,000 of restricted cash.
<F2>
Includes accrued interest of $63,930,000.
<F3>
Revenues include gain on sale of property of $17,046,000.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. HOWARD

No. 37P98

Case below: 128 N.C.App. 532

Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay denied 5 February 1998.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

18 U.S.C. Certification
of Richard A. Mansfield 
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of 
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.

I, Richard A. Mansfield,  Vice
President,  Chief Financial Officer of Duckwall-ALCO  Stores,  Inc., hereby certify,  in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (a) | The
 Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  October 31, 2004,  which
 accompanies  this  certification,  fully               complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) | The
information  contained the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October
31, 2004,  which  accompanies this               certification,  fairly  presents,  in
all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operation  of
              Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed  original of this  written
 statement  required by Section 906 has been  provided to  Duckwall-ALCO  Stores,  Inc.
and will be retained by Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  December 9, 2004

| | By: | /s/ Richard
      A. Mansfield
      Richard A. Mansfield
      
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 24 | 
| | -- | 

---
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Serologicals
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2003 (the "Report") as filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: March 12, 2004


                                         /s/ David A. Dodd
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         David A. Dodd
                                         President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Director
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Park guide:the official newspaper of Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Rainbow BridgeNational Monument**
 
2006: SpringSummer | 2007
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.21/2: G 48/
Item Number:0650-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001059126
 
May 30, 2018
1 | Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group DiscussionRegional StandardsEnforcement Working GroupDefinitions2 | Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group DiscussionUndefined Terms42 USC § 6295(o)(6)(D)(ii): “...market participants,including ... dealers, contractors, and installers”• Dealer• Contractor• Installer3 | Regional Standards Enforcement Working Group DiscussionOther terms?
#### BROWN v. DON PLOTKINS HOME CENTER

No. 506P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 555

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied *4*December 1997.
<PAGE>

                          Haifa, Israel, June 25, 2003

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No.333-10570) of
our report dated March 10, 2003, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of Elbit Systems Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002,
and for the year then ended, which are included in the Elron Electronic
Industries Ltd. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                            /s/ Luboshitz Kasierer

                                            Luboshitz Kasierer
                              An affiliate member of Ernst & Young International
### §8713. Effect of other statutes

Any provision of law outside of this chapter which provides coverage or any other benefit under this chapter to any individuals who (based on their being employed by an entity other than the Government) would not otherwise be eligible for any such coverage or benefit shall not apply with respect to any individual appointed, transferred, or otherwise commencing that type of employment on or after October 1, 1988.

(Added Pub. L. 100–238, title I, §108(a)(2)(A), Jan. 8, 1988, 101 Stat. 1747.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8713, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 598; Pub. L. 90–83, §1(93), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 219; Pub. L. 95–454, title IX, §906(a)(1), (4), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1224, 1225, provided for an advisory committee to be appointed by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management to be composed of five employees insured under this chapter, to serve without additional pay, to advise the Office regarding matters of concern to employees under this chapter, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–427, §9(a), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1837, effective Oct. 10, 1980, with the repeal to have no effect in the case of an employee who died, was separated, or retired before Oct. 10, 1980.
### §1334b. Designation of States outside commercial wheat-producing areas

If the acreage allotment for any State for any crop of wheat is twenty-five thousand acres or less, the Secretary, in order to promote efficient administration of this chapter and the Agricultural Act of 1949 [7 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.], may designate such State as outside the commercial wheat-producing area for the marketing year for such crop. If such State is so designated, acreage allotments for such crop and marketing quotas for the marketing year therefor shall not be applicable to any farm in such State. Acreage allotments in any State shall not be increased by reason of such designation.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §334a, as added Pub. L. 87–703, title III, §314, Sept. 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 620.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Agricultural Act of 1949, referred to in text, is act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, 63 Stat. 1051, which is classified principally to chapter 35A (§1421 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective only with respect to programs applicable to crops planted for harvest in calendar year 1964 or any subsequent year and marketing years beginning in calendar year 1964, or any subsequent year, see section 323 of Pub. L. 87–703, set out as an Effective Date of 1962 Amendment note under section 1301 of this title.

#### Inapplicability of Section

Section inapplicable to 2014 through 2018 crops of covered commodities, cotton, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Feb. 7, 2014, through Dec. 31, 2018, see section 9092(a)(1) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2008 through 2012 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning June 18, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2012, see section 8782(a)(1) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2002 through 2007 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning May 13, 2002, through Dec. 31, 2007, see section 7992(a)(1) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 1996 through 2001 crops of loan commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Apr. 4, 1996, and ending Dec. 31, 2002, see section 7301(a)(1)(A) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 1991 through 1995 crops of wheat, see section 303 of Pub. L. 101–624, set out as a note under section 1331 of this title.
1

Jones, Ricardo

From: luanne.jeram@lanxess.com

Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 5:15 PM

To: Jones, Ricardo; ONeill, Sandra

Subject: Questions on Thiabendazole Preliminary Workplan data requirements for antimicrobial 

uses

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Completed

Dear Ricardo and Sandra, 

I hope you are both well. 

I have a few questions on the data requirements for the antimicrobial uses presented in the Thiabendazole Preliminary 

Workplan (March 2014). 

1) Indoor residue data (guideline 875.2300) is indicated. Testing on which surfaces/surface residues will be required? 

What test method(s) should be used? It's difficult to determine how the information presented in the 1996-02 Working Draft Indoor Surface Residue Dissipation 

(Chapter 6 - Indoor surface residue dissipation) document would be applied to the material preservation uses. 

2) Leaching from treated textiles (special study) is indicated. Will this be more of a migration test or a leaching test? If leaching, will data from a European laboratory test method (EN 16105) be acceptable? Are there any test methods that are recommended to use as a basis of developing a protocol? 

Thank you and please let me know if you require additional information to respond. 

Have a good weekend. 

Best Regards, 

Luanne 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Luanne Jeram 

LANXESS Corporation 

Material Protection Products 

111 RIDC Park West Drive 

Pittsburgh, PA 15275-1112 

Telephone: 412-809-4773 

Fax: 412-809-1074 

Mobile: 412-925-7339 

luanne.jeram@lanxess.com 

www.US.LANXESS.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or 

entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure 

under applicable law. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete 

the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

 
2

This e-mail, including any attachments, contains information that may be confidential, protected by the attorney-client or other 

applicable privileges, or constitutes non-public information. If you are not the designated recipient, please notify the sender by 

replying to this message and then delete it from your system without retaining a copy.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-30772 

Summary Calendar

 

IVORY THOMAS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CV-1885

--------------------

January 28, 2002

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ivory Thomas appeals the district court’s judgment reversing

the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and remanding

his case to the Commissioner for further administrative

proceedings. Thomas argues that the district court abused its

discretion in remanding his case to the Commissioner for further

proceedings without deciding the issue whether he waived his

right to representation. He contends that the determination of

this issue constitutes “law of the case” that should accompany

the district court’s order on remand. In any event, Thomas
No. 01-30772 

-2-

asserts that his IQ score of 53 constitutes evidence of a per se

severe impairment which entitles him to benefits as a matter of

law, and that the district court therefore erred in remanding his

case for additional proceedings.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the

parties and hold that the district court did not err in remanding

Thomas’ case for further administrative proceedings. See

Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-99 (1991); Istre v. Apfel,

208 F.3d 517, 519 (5th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED.
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, David Orlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/27/2011 03:32 PM

Subject: Re: A couple small suggested edits soon

Heidi, 

We don't object to these changes, but would like to understand why they are being made. As you know, 

the language that has been edited is boilerplate language that appears in all of our rules. We don't 

understand why the parentheticals have been added here. Can you help us understand why they have 

been added and whether it is essential that these changes be made to clear the package? Thanks.
### §1310. American agriculture protection program

#### (a) Determination of short supply; suspension of commercial export sales; parity price

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, whenever the President or any other member of the executive branch of the Federal Government causes to be suspended, based upon a determination of short supply, the commercial export sales of any commodity, as defined in subsection (c) of this section, to any country or area with which the United States otherwise continues commercial trade, the Secretary of Agriculture shall, on the day the suspension is initiated, set the loan level for such commodity under the Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended [7 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.], if a loan program is in effect for the commodity, at 90 per centum of the parity price for the commodity, as such parity price is determined on the day the suspension is initiated.

#### (b) Duration of loan level

Any loan level established pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall remain in effect as long as the suspension of commercial export sales described in subsection (a) remains in effect.

#### (c) "Commodity" defined

For purposes of this section, the term "commodity" shall include any of the following: wheat, corn, grain sorghum, soybeans, oats, rye, barley, rice, flaxseed, and cotton.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title X, §1002, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 950.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Agricultural Act of 1949, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, 63 Stat. 1051, which is classified principally to chapter 35A (§1421 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977, and not as part of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1977, see section 1901 of Pub. L. 95–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 1307 of this title.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JOSE LUIS MANZO, AKA Jose Manzo, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 19-30166 

 19-30168

D.C. Nos. 2:07-cr-02042-LRS-2 

 2:07-cr-02088-LRS-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Lonny R. Suko, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 4, 2020**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Jose Luis Manzo appeals pro se from the 

district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-30166 & 19-30168

Manzo contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under the safety 

valve provision of the First Step Act of 2018. The safety valve provision of the 

First Step Act does not appear to be applicable to Manzo, whose criminal 

convictions pre-date the statute’s enactment. See First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. 

No. 115-391, § 402(b), 132 Stat. 5194, 5221 (“The amendment made by this 

section shall apply only to a conviction entered on or after the date of enactment of 

this Act.”). But even if it were, Manzo would not be entitled to safety valve relief. 

As the district court correctly concluded, the First Step Act’s changes to the safety 

valve provision do not help Manzo because, at sentencing, Manzo was determined 

to have six criminal history points, including one three-point offense. See 18 

U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1)(A)-(B) (2019) (defendant is ineligible for safety valve relief if 

he has more than four criminal history points or a prior three-point offense).

Manzo’s motion to take judicial notice is granted. 

AFFIRMED.
### §1015. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–861, §36A, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1569

Section, act July 9, 1952, ch. 608, pt. II, §264, as added Apr. 23, 1956, ch. 209, §2, 70 Stat. 115, related to training period and to eligibility for benefits. See sections 3687, 3721, 6148, 8687, and 8721 of Title 10, Armed Forces.