alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §136s. Solicitation of comments; notice of public hearings

#### (a) Secretary of Agriculture

The Administrator, before publishing regulations under this subchapter, shall solicit the views of the Secretary of Agriculture in accordance with the procedure described in section 136w(a) of this title.

#### (b) Secretary of Health and Human Services

The Administrator, before publishing regulations under this subchapter for any public health pesticide, shall solicit the views of the Secretary of Health and Human Services in the same manner as the views of the Secretary of Agriculture are solicited under section 136w(a)(2) of this title.

#### (c) Views

In addition to any other authority relating to public hearings and solicitation of views, in connection with the suspension or cancellation of a pesticide registration or any other actions authorized under this subchapter, the Administrator may, at the Administrator's discretion, solicit the views of all interested persons, either orally or in writing, and seek such advice from scientists, farmers, farm organizations, and other qualified persons as the Administrator deems proper.

#### (d) Notice

In connection with all public hearings under this subchapter the Administrator shall publish timely notice of such hearings in the Federal Register.

(June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §21, as added Pub. L. 92–516, §2, Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 996; amended Pub. L. 94–140, §2(b), Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 752; Pub. L. 100–532, title VIII, §801(l), Oct. 25, 1988, 102 Stat. 2682; Pub. L. 102–237, title X, §1006(b)(1), (2), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1895; Pub. L. 104–170, title II, §234, Aug. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1509.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 104–170 added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsecs. (b) and (c) as (c) and (d), respectively.

1991—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–237 substituted "the Administrator" for "he" before "deems" and "the Administrator's" for "his".

1988—Pub. L. 100–532, §801(l), inserted headings for subsecs. (a) to (c).

1975—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–140 inserted "in accordance with the procedure described in section 136w(a) of this title" after "Secretary of Agriculture".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–532 effective on expiration of 60 days after Oct. 25, 1988, see section 901 of Pub. L. 100–532, set out as a note under section 136 of this title.

#### Effective Date

For effective date of section, see section 4 of Pub. L. 92–516, set out as a note under section 136 of this title.
§ 37.1295 Grant. A legal instrument which, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship: ( a ) The principal purpose of which is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Department of Defense's direct benefit or use.
( b ) In which substantial involvement is not expected between the Department of Defense and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the grant.
§ 651.40 Introduction. ( a ) An EIS is a public document designed to ensure that NEPA policies and goals are incorporated early into the programs and actions of federal agencies. An EIS is intended to provide a full, open, and balanced discussion of significant environmental impacts that may result from a proposed action and alternatives, allowing public review and comment on the proposal and providing a basis for informed decision-making.
( b ) The NEPA process should support sound, informed, and timely (early) decision-making; not produce encyclopedic documents. CEQ guidance (40 CFR 1502.7) should be followed, establishing a page limit of 150 pages (300 pages for complex projects). To the extent practicable, EISs will “incorporate by reference” any material that is reasonably available for inspection by potentially interested persons within the time allowed for comment. The incorporated material shall be cited in the EIS and its content will be briefly described. Material based on proprietary data, that is itself not available for review and comment, shall not be incorporated by reference.
### **CHAPTER 63—FARMER–TO–CONSUMER DIRECT MARKETING**

Sec.
3001.
Congressional statement of purpose.
3002.
Definitions.
3003.
Survey.
3004.
Direct marketing assistance within the States.
3005, 3006.
Repealed.
3007.
Seniors farmers' market nutrition program.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 27, 2017

t0920

Order 

Clerk

September 27, 2017

155630

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155630

COA: 330217 

Oakland CC: 2015-255155-FH

SCOTT LARRY CHANDLER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 2103.14 Challenges to classification.

If holders of classified information believe that the information is improperly or unnecessarily classified, or that original classification has been extended for too long a period, they should discuss the matter with their immediate superiors or the classifier of the information. If these discussions do not satisfy the concerns of the challenger, the matter should be brought to the attention of the chairperson of the NSC Information Security Oversight Committee (see § 2103.51 of this part).
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 7, 2009

s0430 

# Order

May 7, 2009

137251

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137251 COA: 274945 Macomb CC: 2 006-002756-FC JASON MICHAEL GURSKY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is GR ANTED, limited to the issues: (1) whether the statem ents made by the complainant to Stacy Morgan on or about May 4, 2006 were “shown to have been spontaneous and without indication of manufacture” within the meaning of MRE 803A(2), and (2) whether it was more probable than not that any error in this regard was ou tcome determinative. See People v Lukity , 460 Mich 484, 495-496 (1999).

We further ORDER the Macomb Circuit C ourt, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine wh ether the defendant is indige nt and, if so, to appoint counsel to represent the de fendant in this Court.

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are inv ited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups
interested in the determinati on of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
#### MUSE v. BRITT

No. 373P97

Case below: 344 N.C. 632

123 N.CApp. 357

Petition by petitioner (Muse) for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 October 1997.
### §1736g. Coordination of foreign assistance programs

To the maximum extent practicable, assistance for a foreign country under subchapter III–A shall be coordinated and integrated with United States development assistance objectives and programs for that country and with the overall development strategy of that country. Special emphasis should be placed on, and funds devoted to, activities that will increase the nutritional impact of programs of assistance under subchapter III–A, and child survival programs and projects, in least developed countries by improving the design and implementation of such programs and projects.

(July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title IV, §413, as added Pub. L. 96–53, title II, §210, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 370; amended Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1512, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3656; Pub. L. 104–127, title II, §221, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 958; Pub. L. 110–246, title III, §3022, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1829; Pub. L. 113–79, title III, §3015, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 778.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–79 struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading before "To the maximum" and struck out subsec. (b) which required a report to Congress regarding efforts to improve procurement planning not later than 90 days after June 18, 2008.

2008—Pub. L. 110–246 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

1996—Pub. L. 104–127 substituted "subchapter III–A" for "this chapter" in two places.

1990—Pub. L. 101–624 amended section generally, substituting present provisions for provisions requiring, to maximum extent practicable, availability of commodities on multiyear basis.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, see section 4(b) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–624 effective Jan. 1, 1991, see section 1513 of Pub. L. 101–624, set out as a note under section 1691 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 512(a) of Pub. L. 96–53, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 2151 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
### DIVISION C—NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS
### SUBCHAPTER XIV—INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN INSULAR AREAS
#### § 67.1 Purpose.

This part provides guidance for implementing policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes under 10 U.S.C. 12205 for identifying criteria for determining educational institutions that award baccalaureate degrees which satisfy the educational requirement for appointment of officers to a grade above First Lieutenant in the Army Reserve, Air Force Reserve, and Marine Corps Reserve, or Lieutenant (Junior Grade) in the Naval Reserve, or for officers to be federally recognized in a grade level above First Lieutenant as a member of the Army National Guard or Air National Guard.
SERVED OCTOBER M/^Ol l ]£PARTMFNT OF 

. Ul^NSPOFfWTION 

U.S. DEPAR'rMF-NT OF TRANSPORTATION ^' •'^^••^ET OPERATIONS 

OFFICE OP HEARINGS , , ^ . , 

WASHINGTON, DC ?-^'5 CO H P l'- UM 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CARLILE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS 

FA A DOCKET NO. CPI0AL0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-20IO-0789 

AiMENDED NOTICE O F HEARING DATES 

NOTICE \S HEREBY GWEN l\vd\ lestimoi-iy and evidence WiW be heard and considered 

the week of December 5 and 6, 2011, at the U.S. District Court for the District of 

Alaska, 222 W. 7'" Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. 

Hearings will commeace at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:00 p.m. each day. The parties 

should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be 

removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper pleading(s). Pleadings 

may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 

U.S. Aihriinistrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP10AL0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) . 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Roy L. Longacre, Respondeni 's Counsel 

Longacre Law Offices, Ltd. 

425 G Street, Suite 910 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

TEL: 907-276-6354 

FAX: 907-279-4685 

Howard L. Martin, Jr., Compiainan/'s Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7*^ Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AL 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5269 

FAX; 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 _ _ 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20550 _ — -

-TECr^202^^6^lT9 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use Ihe following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Hurco Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/John G.
    OblazneyJohn
      G. OblazneyVice
      President & Chief Financial OfficerJanuary
      12, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               2,377
<SECURITIES>                                         6,518
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (540)
<INVENTORY>                                          4,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    14,881
<PP&E>                                              17,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (12,646)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      25,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,743
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                99
<OTHER-SE>                                          22,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        25,289
<SALES>                                              5,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,171
<CGS>                                                3,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,457
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        812
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (628)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,440
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,440
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .14



</TABLE>
### §1037. Sale of reserved mineral interests; disposition of proceeds

All proceeds from sales made under sections 1033 to 1039 of this title of mineral interests described in section 1033 of this title shall be covered into the Treasury of the United States as miscellaneous receipts, except that the proceeds from sales of mineral interests which were a part of or derived from the assets transferred pursuant to the transfer agreements with State rural rehabilitation corporations shall be credited to the appropriate corporation account.

(Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 897, §5, 64 Stat. 770.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act which constitutes a major part of this chapter.
### §191. "Packer" defined

When used in this chapter the term "packer" means any person engaged in the business (a) of buying livestock in commerce for purposes of slaughter, or (b) of manufacturing or preparing meats or meat food products for sale or shipment in commerce, or (c) of marketing meats, meat food products, or livestock products in an unmanufactured form acting as a wholesale broker, dealer, or distributor in commerce.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title II, §201, 42 Stat. 160; Pub. L. 94–410, §2, Sept. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 1249.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–410 substituted definition of "packer" for former definition which included provisions dealing with direct or indirect control of specified businesses through stock ownership or otherwise.
|   | Exhibit 32 |
|--------|------------|

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert C. Stempel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Sanjeev Kumar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley* Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that based on his knowledge:

 

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Robert C. Stempel
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R.H. Donnelley
Inc. for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officers knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of R.H. Donnelley Corporation as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    Steven M. BlondyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    SVP and Chief Financial OfficerMay 7, 2004
    
    May 7, 2004
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document. 67
P.1 

OAR Box 1500 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

24) ll-C-50 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/5/2008 1:51:27 PM Sheet 24 of 343 
•4.4=0 ST*, . 

\~o*f 

UJ 

o 

P.2 

A-94-52 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 

JAN I 3 I997 

OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

Ms. Glynn Rountree 

Aerospace Industries Association 

1250 Eye Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20005-3922 

Dear Glynn: 

'0OC<<7T 

This is in response to your December 20, 1996 request for 

clarification of the intended scope of the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for reinforced 

plastic composites production. The analysis for this standard 

has focused on styrene-containing resins and gel coats, including 

polyester and vinyl ester resins. While we have not yet defined 

applicability for the NESHAP, we would envision at this point 

that epoxy resins that do not contain styrene or significant 

amounts of other hazardous air pollutants (HAP) would not be 

covered. However, aerospace facilities that use styrenecontaining resins may be affected by this rule. We have 

requested information from individual aerospace companies on 

reinforced plastic operations. We would appreciate any 

assistance you could provide to help define the extent to which 

styrene or other HAP are emitted from reinforced plastics 

operations in the aerospace industry. 

As you can imagine, the reinforced plastics NESHAP covers a 

wide range of industrial processes and markets. Therefore, our 

primary communication with industry stakeholders has been through 

the broad-based trade associations of the Society of the Plastics 

Industry and the Composite Fabricators Association. We also 

welcome input and participation from the Aerospace Industries 

Association. The project lead for the reinforced plastics NESHAP 

is Madeleine Strum. You may contact her at (919) 541-2383 if you 

have any questions regarding the development of this NESHAP. 

Also feel free to contact the Group Leader for the Coatings and 

Consumer Products Group, Linda Herring, at (919) 541-5358. 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Postconsumer) 

/ 
P.3 

I hope this information has been helpful to you. If you 

should require further assistance, please contact the abovementioned members of my staff or call me directly at 

(919) 541-5572. 

Sincerely, 

J^^Brtifee 2T Jordan 

Director 

Emission Standards Division 

<3L
#### Ralph Musone, Respondent, v. Rose Musone, Appellant.

In a partition action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered February 9, 1960, which: (1) granted plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment striking out defendant’s answer; and (2) denied defendant’s motion to preclude. Order affirmed, without costs. Under the deed by which the parties acquired title to the property, the intention was to take as tenants by the entirety. The parties, however, were not then and never have been legally married. Therefore, they are tenants in common of the property involved and partition is maintainable. The respective contributions of the parties to the purchase and upkeep of the property, and the propriety of the respective items, will be passed on before the Referee in partition. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.