alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.4



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Duquesne Light Company (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mark E. Kaplan, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (7) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (8) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 8thday of November, 2005.



/s/ Mark E. KaplanMark E. KaplanSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Duquesne Light Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Crowe
Horwath LLP












We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-144510) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-48204 and 333-149809) of Hurco
Companies, Inc. of our report dated January 12, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in this
Form 10-K of Hurco Companies, Inc. as of and for the year ended October 31,
2008.







/s/Crowe
Horwath LLP





Indianapolis,
Indiana


January
12, 2009
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2*


Section 1350 Certification


        I, Steven G. Larson, the chief financial officer of LaserCard
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certify pursuant to section
1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge:

        (i)     the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and

        (ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    November 8, 2004

/s/ Steven G. Larson
--------------------
Steven G. Larson


-----------------------

*       The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed "filed" with
the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.





                                       41
### §3344. Details; administrative law judges

An agency as defined by section 551 of this title which occasionally or temporarily is insufficiently staffed with administrative law judges appointed under section 3105 of this title may use administrative law judges selected by the Office of Personnel Management from and with the consent of other agencies.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 425; Pub. L. 95–251, §2(a)(1), (b)(2), Mar. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 183; Pub. L. 95–454, title IX, §906(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1224.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 1010 (4th sentence). | June 11, 1946, ch. 324, §11 (4th sentence), 60 Stat. 244. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–454 substituted "Office of Personnel Management" for "Civil Service Commission".

Pub. L. 95–251 substituted references to administrative law judges for references to hearing examiners in section catchline and wherever appearing in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–454 effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
### §4219. Compliance with Budget Act

No authority under this subchapter to enter into contracts or to make payments shall be effective in any fiscal year except to such extent and in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts. In any fiscal year, total benefits conferred by this subchapter shall be limited to an amount not in excess of the appropriations for such fiscal year. Any provision of this subchapter which, directly or indirectly, authorizes the enactment of new budget authority shall be effective only for fiscal year 1989 and thereafter.

(Pub. L. 100–383, title I, §109, Aug. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 910.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Budget Act, referred to in section catchline, probably means the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, titles I through IX of Pub. L. 93–344, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 297. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 621 of Title 2, The Congress, and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1989b–8 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §1572. Records

All persons transporting, or delivering for transportation, in interstate commerce, agricultural seeds shall keep for a period of three years a complete record of origin, treatment, germination, and purity of each lot of such agricultural seeds, and all persons transporting, or delivering for transportation, in interstate commerce, vegetable seeds shall keep for a period of three years a complete record of treatment, germination and variety of such vegetable seeds. The Secretary of Agriculture, or his duly authorized agents, shall have the right to inspect such records for the purpose of the effective administration of this chapter.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title II, §202, 53 Stat. 1281; Pub. L. 85–581, §9, Aug. 1, 1958, 72 Stat. 477; Pub. L. 89–686, §11, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 978.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1966—Pub. L. 89–686 required record of treatment of agricultural and vegetable seeds.

1958—Pub. L. 85–581 required keeping of records of vegetable seeds.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

See section 1610 of this title.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2014 - 0650 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM162AD

A605 - 28 - 008, R01 --- 5/28 /14

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1425 

Reaffirming the House of Representatives’s commitment to ensuring secure 

elections throughout the United States by recognizing that the presentation of valid photograph identification is a fundamental component 

of secure elections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. 

NEHLS, Mr. CRANE, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, and Mr. ROSENDALE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Reaffirming the House of Representatives’s commitment to 

ensuring secure elections throughout the United States 

by recognizing that the presentation of valid photograph 

identification is a fundamental component of secure elections. 

Whereas elections allow United States citizens to empower 

their fellow citizens to be their voice in the constitutional 

republic; 

Whereas the operation of free and fair elections is vital to 

Americans’ trust in government; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1425 IH 

Whereas countries that hold elections without very basic security measures eventually lose the support of their people 

and erode faith in elections and the rule of law; 

Whereas absentee voting systems and voting by mail systems 

that lack photograph verification are less secure than inperson voting with photograph verification; 

Whereas United States citizens are required by law to present 

valid photograph identification to prove identity for a 

wide array of other interactions with government, including applications for taxpayer-funded food stamps, welfare, Social Security, and Medicaid; 

Whereas United States citizens are required by law to present 

valid photograph identification to prove identity for a 

wide array of interactions with private institutions, including to open a bank account, rent or buy a house, 

apply for a mortgage, buy, rent, or operate a motor vehicle, board an airplane, get married, purchase firearms, 

buy a cell phone, apply for fishing and hunting licenses, 

pick up prescription medication, and many other functions; and 

Whereas United States citizens possess no greater commodity 

than the franchise, and understand that protection of the 

security of voting and elections is crucial for the maintenance of the Republic and its way of life: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) reaffirms and reiterates its commitment to 

3 ensuring secure elections throughout the United 

4 States; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1425 IH 

1 (2) recognizes that the presentation of valid 

2 photograph identification is a fundamental compo3 nent of secure elections throughout the United 

4 States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Greg G. Gruber, Chief Financial Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



                                              /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Greg G. Gruber
                                              Chief Financial Officer

                                              August 13, 2002
§ 37.300 What is the difference between an expenditure-based and fixed-support TIA? The fundamental difference between an expenditure-based and fixed-support TIA is that: ( a ) For an expenditure-based TIA, the amounts of interim payments or the total amount ultimately paid to the recipient are based on the amounts the recipient expends on project costs. If a recipient completes the project specified at the time of award before it expends all of the agreed-upon Federal funding and recipient cost sharing, the Federal Government may recover its share of the unexpended balance of funds or, by mutual agreement with the recipient, amend the agreement to expand the scope of the research project. An expenditure-based TIA therefore is analogous to a cost-type procurement contract or grant.
( b ) For a fixed-support TIA, the amount of assistance established at the time of award is not meant to be adjusted later if the research project is carried out to completion. In that sense, a fixed-support TIA is somewhat analogous to a fixed-price procurement contract (although “price,” a concept appropriate to a procurement contract for buying a good or service, is not appropriate for a TIA or other assistance instrument for stimulation or support of a project).
**Exhibit 3.3**

 

**ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TOTHE RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OFLANCER CORPORATION**

** **

Pursuantto the provisions of article 4.04 of the Texas Business Corporation Act,the undersigned corporation adopts the following articles of amendment to itsrestated articles of incorporation.

 

**Article One**

 

Thename of the corporation is LANCER CORPORATION.

 

**Article Two**

 

Thefollowing amendment to the restated articles of incorporation was adopted bythe shareholders of the corporation on May 22, 1997.

 

The amendment amends the first paragraph of Article Fourof the Restated Articles of Incorporation to read in its entirety as follows:

 

The Corporation shall have authority to issue twoclasses of shares, to be designated respectively, “preferred” and “common”. Thetotal number of shares which the Corporation is authorized to issue isfifty-five million (55,000,000) shares. The number of preferred shares authorized is five million (5,000,000)nonassessable shares, which shares are without par value.  The number of common shares authorized isfifty million (50,000,000) nonassessable shares and the par value of each suchshare is $0.01.

 

**Article Three**

 

Thenumber of shares of the Corporation outstanding at the time of such adoptionwas 5,837,798; and the number of shares entitled to vote thereon was 5,837,798.

 

**Article Four**

 

Thenumber of shares voted for such amendment was 5,128,923; and the number ofshares voted against such amendment was 434,338.

 
| Dated  June 2, 1997. |               |
|---------------------------|--------------------|
|                      |               |
|                      | LANCER CORPORATION |
|                      |               |
|                      |               |
|                      | By:                |  /s/  GEORGE F. SCHROEDER |   |
|                      |               | George  F. Schroeder, President |

 

----
### SUBCHAPTER II—LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES
'I 

### SERVED: March 21,2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION · OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF OFFSHORE FLIGHT SCHOOL, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0691 (Civil Penalty Action)

ORDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDlNG - t-**~·** { '·1.,. l 1
.**'--~ ~~**  • · ..•,\ . ' " :**~** t ·, j i .i '·
. .!

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin has transferred to the Food and Drug Administration. Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby reassigned from Judge Goodwin to Administrative Law Judge Douglas M. Rawald. Any dates set tor hearing orprehearing conference are suspended until further notice. All otherorders remain in full force and effect absent further,order. SO ORDERED.

### SERVICE LIST- BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WI000 1

President Offshore Flight School, Inc., Respondent 100 lolana Place, #A Honolulu, HI 96819 TEL: 808-836-8688 

### ONE COPY

David Glenn Bettencourt, Respondent's Counsel Dillingham Transportation Building, Suite 304 735 Bishop Street Honolulu, HI 96813 TEL: 808-521-3491 FAX: 808-521-7749 Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 1601 Lind Ave., S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 2'0590
·TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant

FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo.

**FAA~2014-0691** (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00096-CV

______________________________

IN RE: RICHARD M. KING, JR.

 

Original Mandamus Proceeding

 

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Richard M. King, Jr., was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child. He complained

to the trial court that his attorney failed to consult with an expert in the area of child sexual abuse.

For reasons not thoroughly explained in King's petition for writ of mandamus with this Court, he

filed a civil suit against his attorney, clerk of the court, and several deputy clerks. King asks this

Court to issue mandamus relief against Judge Eric Clifford due to his "conspiracy with one or more

of the defendants in this matter, [and refusal] to allow King to file his civil suit." King's petition

clearly states that he did not pay the filing fee for this civil suit. Although he submitted an affidavit

of indigency, it is not included as part of any record for our review. 

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that issues only to correct a clear abuse of discretion

or violation of a duty imposed by law when no other adequate remedy by law is available. State v.

Walker, 679 S.W.2d 484, 485 (Tex. 1984) (orig. proceeding). Due to the nature of this remedy, it

is King's burden to properly request and show entitlement to the mandamus relief. See generally

Johnson v. Fourth Dist. Court of Appeals, 700 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Tex. 1985) (orig. proceeding);

Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding)

("Even a pro se applicant for a writ of mandamus must show himself entitled to the extraordinary

relief he seeks."). 

King had the obligation to provide us with evidence in support of his claim that he is entitled

to mandamus relief. No record has been filed with this Court. The absence of a mandamus record
3

prevents us from evaluating the circumstances of this case and, consequently, the merits of King's

complaints. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7; Barnes, 832 S.W.2d at 426. 

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. 

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: November 10, 2009

Date Decided: November 12, 2009
EXHIBIT 10.20.19




             Third Amendment to Letter Agreement (European Facility)
                               dated May 31, 1995
            among the Registrant's Foreign Subsidiaries and NBD Bank

































<PAGE>


                                    NBD BANK
                              611 Woodward Avenue
                            Detroit, Michigan 48226




                                          Dated as of May 31, 1995





Hurco Europe Limited
Hurco GmbH Werkzeugmaschinen
  CIM-Bausteine Vertrieb und Service

                           Re:   Third Amendment to European Facility

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         This letter amends the letter  agreement  with you dated June 17, 1993,
as previously  amended by the letter  agreements dated March 24, 1994, and as of
January 31, 1995 (as amended, the "European Facility"),and is being entered into
in  conjunction  with the  Second  Amendment  to Credit  Agreement  of even date
herewith with your parent, Hurco Companies, Inc.

         The definition of "Expiration Date" in the European Facility is amended
to read as follows:


                  "Expiration  Date"  means the  earlier  to occur of (a) May 1,
                  1996, and (b) the date on which NBD declares  under  paragraph
                  13 all principal and interest on  indebtedness to NBD provided
                  under this agreement to be immediately due and payable.

       Should the foregoing be agreeable to you, as it is to us, please indicate
your  agreement  and  acceptance by executing and returning the enclosed copy of
this  letter,  whereupon  the  European  Facility  shall be  amended  as  herein
provided,  and  references  to the  European  Facility  shall be to the European
Facility as so amended.  Except as amended hereby,  the European  Facility shall
remain in full force and effect.

                                                   Very truly yours,

                                                   NBD Bank (formerly known as 
                                                   NBD Bank, N.A.)


                                                   By: /S/ ANDREW P. ARTON
                                                       ----------------------
                                                       Andrew P. Arton
                                                   Its: Second Vice President




<PAGE>


Agreed and accepted:


HURCO EUROPE LIMITED


By: /S/ ROGER J. WOLF
    ----------------------
Its: Director

Dated as of May 31, 1995


HURCO GmbH WERKZEUGMASCHINEN
CIM-BAUSTEINE VERTRIEB UND
SERVICE


By: /S/ GERHARD KOHLBACHER
    ----------------------
Its: General Manager

Dated as of May 31, 1995
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Security Capital Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Brian D. Fitzgerald, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|                     |  | /s/ Brian D. Fitzgerald       
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|                     |  | Name: Brian D. Fitzgerald     
|                     |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
|Date: March 28, 2003 |  |                               

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---
#### § 37.1355 Recipient.

An organization or other entity that receives a TIA from a DoD Component. Note that a for-profit recipient may be a firm or a segment of a firm (e.g., a division or other business unit).