alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-1998
<CASH>                                      11,714,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               69,317,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,474,000)
<INVENTORY>                                112,189,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           223,485,000
<PP&E>                                     600,267,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             162,865,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             812,798,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      161,865,000
<BONDS>                                    497,661,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       148,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  76,591,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               812,798,000
<SALES>                                    128,655,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           128,655,000
<CGS>                                       96,566,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               96,566,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               248,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,497,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,032,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (642,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,390,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,390,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)
        

</TABLE>
Section 333 Exemption Petition

OPERATION NEAR AIRPORTS

5/11/15 Battery Ion, inc.

UAS

Airport A

Airport B

Note: UAS is not to scale and is elevated higher than permitted only to illustrate operation's distance from airports. Certificate Of Waiver or Authorization (COA) for operations under 200' AGL if:

*5 nautical miles (NM) from an airport having an operational control tower; or

*3 NM from an airport with a published instrument flight procedure, but not an operational tower; or

*2 NM from an airport without a published instrument flight procedure or an operational tower

Figure 1
Section 333 Exemption Petition

OPERATIONS NEAR OFF AIRPORT HELIPORTS

5/11/15 Battery Ion, inc.

Ground Heliport FATO (0' AGL)

Imaginary protected air space

8':1' Flight Path

0' AGL

2 Nautical Miles from Final Approach Take Off Area (FATO)

sUAS operating air space.

Figure 2

Certificate Of Waiver or Authorization (COA) for operations under 200' AGL if:

*2 NM from a heliport with a published instrument flight procedure

200' - 500' AGL
Section 333 Exemption Petition

ON PROPERTY OPERATIONS AIRSPACE

5/11/15 Battery Ion, inc. Property

Line

500' AGL

Pilot In Command

sUAS Landing/Take Off area

Observer

Figure 3

200' AGL
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Paris G. Singer, Deceased. State Tax Commission, Appellant; Francis R. Appleton, Jr., et al., as Trustees Under the Will of Violet E. Singer, Deceased, and as Executors of Paris G. Singer, Deceased, Respondents.

Order entered October 4, 1962, adjudging improper the inclusion in the estate of Paris G. Singer, deceased, a nonresident, of real property located in New York over which he exercised a power of appointment, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of striking ihe second decretal paragraph, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. It is not within the jurisdiction of the Surrogate’s Court to order the State Tax Commission to refund any part of the tax paid. The remedy is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. *(Matter of Shepard,*225 App. Div. 782.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, E'ager and Steuer, JJ.
### §9201. Definitions

In this chapter—

(1) the term "agency" means "Executive agency" as such term is defined in section 105 and includes—

(A) the United States Postal Service and the Postal Regulatory Commission; and

(B) the Executive Office of the President;

(2) the term "appointing authority" means an employee in the executive branch of the Government of the United States that has authority to make appointments to positions in the civil service;

(3) the term "conditional offer" means an offer of employment in a position in the civil service that is conditioned upon the results of a criminal history inquiry;

(4) the term "criminal history record information"—

(A) except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), has the meaning given the term in section 9101(a);

(B) includes any information described in the first sentence of section 9101(a)(2) that has been sealed or expunged pursuant to law; and

(C) includes information collected by a criminal justice agency, relating to an act or alleged act of juvenile delinquency, that is analogous to criminal history record information (including such information that has been sealed or expunged pursuant to law); and

(5) the term "suspension" has the meaning given the term in section 7501.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XI, §1122(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1605.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XI, §1122(b)(1), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1607, provided that: "Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this subtitle [subtitle A of title XI of div. A of Pub. L. 116–92, approved Dec. 20, 2019], the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall issue such regulations as are necessary to carry out chapter 92 of title 5, United States Code (as added by this subtitle)."
§ 750.67 Scope of liability. ( a ) Subject to the exceptions in § 750.68 of specific claims not payable, the United States shall not pay more than $1,000.00 for a claim against the United States, not cognizable under any other provision of law, except Article 139, UCMJ.
( b ) Article 139, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. 939, is not preemptive. The prohibition in 10 U.S.C. 2737 on paying claims “not cognizable under any other provisions of law” applies only to law authorizing claims against the United States. Article 139 authorizes claims against servicemembers. See part 755 of this chapter.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—PROGRAMS FOR HISPANIC, ALASKA NATIVE, AND NATIVE HAWAIIAN SERVING INSTITUTIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter VII, consisting of parts A (§3241), B (§§3251, 3252), C (§§3261 to 3263), D (§3271), and E (§§3281, 3282), related to solar energy research and development, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1601(f)(1)(D), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3704.

Section 3241, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1449, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1012, related to farm and forest uses of solar energy and nonrenewable fuel and petrochemical substitutes.

Section 3251, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1450, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 1012, provided for a solar energy research information system.

Section 3252, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1451, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1013, provided for assistance from an advisory committee respecting functions of Secretary on model farms and demonstration projects.

Section 3261, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1452, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1013, provided for model farms.

Section 3262, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1453, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1014, provided for demonstration projects.

Section 3263, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1454, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1015; Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1434, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1312, authorized appropriation of funds.

Section 3271, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1455, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1015, provided for establishment of regional solar energy research, development, and demonstration centers.

Section 3281, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1456, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1015, authorized appropriation of funds.

Section 3282, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1457, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1015; Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1435, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1313, defined "solar energy".
#### Hylan Homes, Inc., Respondent, v. Hylan Terrace, Inc., Appellant.

Motion to stay an injunction granted pursuant to section 964 of the Penal Law, pending appeal to this court granted on condition that appellant be ready to argue or submit the appeal on September 7, 1960, for which day the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. Motion to dispense with printing denied, without costs. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before August 22, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER II—COORDINATION AND PLANNING OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, EXTENSION, AND TEACHING
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Escalade,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 3, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Deborah Meinert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|/s/ Deborah Meinert     |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer |  |  | 
|November 5, 2009        |  |  | 

---
§ 553.3 Statutory authorities. ( a ) *Historical.* Act of July 17, 1862, Sec. 18, 12 Stat. 594, 596; Act of February 22, 1867, Ch. 61, 14 Stat. 399; and the National Cemeteries Act of 1973, Public Law 93-43, 87 Stat. 75 (1973). The National Cemeteries Act established the National Cemetery System, which primarily consists of national cemeteries transferred from the management authority of the Department of the Army to the (now) Department of Veterans Affairs. Section 6(a) of the Act exempted Arlington National Cemetery and the Soldiers' and Airmen's Home National Cemetery from transfer to the National Cemetery System, leaving them under the management authority of the Secretary of the Army.
( b ) *Current.* Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 4721(a), the Secretary of the Army shall develop, operate, manage, oversee, and fund the Army National Military Cemeteries. Section 4721(c) provides that the Army National Military Cemeteries are under the jurisdiction of Headquarters, Department of the Army, and 10 U.S.C. 4721(d) provides that the Secretary of the Army shall prescribe such regulations and policies as may be necessary to administer the Army National Military Cemeteries. The responsibilities of Headquarters, Department of the Army with regard to the Army National Military Cemeteries are enumerated in 10 U.S.C. 4721-4726 and Army General Orders 2014-74 and 2014-75.
#### GREENE, Respondent, v. KNOX et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by J. Warren Greene against Charles H. Knox and others.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Oourt of Appeals granted, and the following questions certified: First. Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? Second. Has the plaintiff legal capacity to sue? Third. Have causes of action been improperly united in the complaint?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000768608
<NAME>                        Town & Country Corporation
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Feb-23-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                Feb-26-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  Feb-23-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                         10,431,911
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23,490,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,243,000
<INVENTORY>                                    42,752,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               77,496,215
<PP&E>                                         56,215,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                 33,242,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                121,312,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          40,340,476
<BONDS>                                        78,090,054
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           2,373,654
<PREFERRED>                                     1,302,673
<COMMON>                                          261,730
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,053,341)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  121,312,016
<SALES>                                       209,152,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              209,152,862
<CGS>                                         147,466,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 182,967,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               74,393,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                6,574,188
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,722,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (62,017,273)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      260,762
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (62,278,035)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (63,018,708)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (2.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (2.47)
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                               Consent of KPMG LLP



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
American Classic Voyages Co.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
33-80614 on Form S-3 and No. 333-44225 on Form S-8 of American Classic Voyages
Co. of our report dated February 19, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of American Classic Voyages Co. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1998, and the related financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of
American Classic Voyages Co.

                                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP

                                                                        KPMG LLP



Chicago, Illinois
March 31, 1999
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41229 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PATRICK ROSS, also known as Pat, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-29-8

-------------------- August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Patrick Neal Ross appeals his sentence following his guiltyplea conviction for conspiring to distribute or possess with intent to distribute cocaine base and for maintaining a place for the purpose of distributing cocaine base. Ross argues that the district court erred in finding that heplayed a supervisory role in the offense and in applying a threelevel increase pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b). The evidenceNo. 01-41229 -2- showed that Ross directed the drug distribution of others at his residence. The district court’s finding that he was a supervisor is not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Parker , 133 F.3d 322, 329 (5th Cir. 1998). Ross argues that the district court erred in denying him a three-level reduction for his acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, based on the “mere fact” that he testified as a witness for the defense at the trial of a codefendant. Ross is not being forthcoming with this court. The district court found that he obstructed justice, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, by testifying falsely at that trial. The district court’s finding that Ross did not accept responsibility because he obstructed justice is not clearly erroneous. Ross has not shown that his case was an “extraordinary” one in which both §§ 3C1.1 and 3E1.1 could have been applied. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.4).
AFFIRMED.
---

---

EXHIBIT 14(a)(3)

Chaikin, Cohen, Rubin & Gilboa.

|Atidim Technology Park, Bldg. 4,
P.O.B. 58143 Tel-Aviv 61580, Israel
Tel: 972-3-6489858 Fax: 972-3-6489946
E-mail:accounting@ccrcpa.co.il
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                         
|Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)                                                                                                      

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the inclusion in
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Scailex Corporation Ltd. (Scailex) for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Annual Report), and to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Scailex on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-34233, Registration No. 33-46861, Registration No. 33-87614,
Registration No. 33-97622, Registration No. 33-97624 and Registration No. 33-39364), of
our Report dated March 2, 2005, with respect to the financial statements of Objet
Geometries Ltd. as of December 31, 2004.

| |  | Sincerely Yours,/s/ Chaikin, Cohen, Rubin & GilboaChaikin, Cohen, Rubin & GilboaCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tel-Aviv,
IsraelJune 28, 2006



---

---
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 25, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel
A. Messmer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ DANIEL A. MESSMER
-------------------------
Daniel A. Messmer
Chief Executive Officer
March 9, 2007


                                       19
### §1390. Separability

If any provision of this chapter, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the chapter and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, and the provisions of chapter 3B of title 16, shall not be affected thereby. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if any provision of this chapter should be held not to be within the power of the Congress to regulate interstate and foreign commerce, such provision shall not be held invalid if it is within the power of the Congress to provide for the general welfare or any other power of the Congress. If any provision of this chapter for marketing quotas with respect to any commodity should be held invalid, no provision of this chapter for marketing quotas with respect to any other commodity shall be affected thereby. If the application of any provision for a referendum should be held invalid, the application of other provisions shall not be affected thereby. If by reason of any provision for a referendum the application of any such other provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the application of such other provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §390, 52 Stat. 69.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Chapter 3B [§590a et seq.] of title 16, referred to in text, was in the original a reference to the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1182 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-062-AD

Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-70, S-70A, S-70C, S-70C(M), and S70C(M1) Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 9 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect a plug in the intermediate 

gearbox (IGB) and prevent overheating and seizing of the IGB, failure of the tail rotor drive 

output shaft, loss of tail rotor drive, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $21,283

Labor per Helicopter

(2 x $85/work-hour for the 

inspection)

(3 x $85/work-hour for the 

replacement)

$170

$255

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $170 for the inspection

$21,538 for the replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $1,530 for the inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Mike Davison
June 23, 1977.

M. P. No. 77-156.

#### John F. Destefano *et al. v.*The Zoning Board of Review of the City of Warwick.

Petition for *951writ of certiorari is granted and the writ shall issue forthwith.

*Lynch & McDonald, Thomas A. Lynch,*.for petitioners.

*William J. Toohey,*City Solicitor, *Russell Bramley,*Asst..City Solicitor, for respondent.
§ 552.113 References. This regulation is to be used in conjunction with the following: ( a ) AR-190-11 with Forces Command and Training Command Supplement 1 (Physical Security of Arms, Ammunition and Explosives).
( b ) AR 190-13 with Forces Command and Training Command Supplement 1 (The Army Physical Security Program).
( c ) Fort Lewis Regulation 210-1 (Installation Fort Lewis Post Regulations).
( d ) Headquarters Fort Lewis Form 816 (Registration of Personal Firearms).