alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Antoinette K. Jacobs et al., Appellants, v. Flora R. and Isidor M. Stettenheim Foundation, Inc., Respondent.

Order entered on January 7, 1960 granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs to plaintiffs-appellants, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied, with $10 costs, with leave, however, to defendant-respondent to renew its motion for summary judgment, if it is so advised, after the completion of pretrial proceedings. There are issues of fact which appear to require exploration, at least at the pretrial level. There is sufficient documentation, coupled with candid concessions by defendant’s directors lending support to the thesis that one of the objects of the founder and the moving spirits in defendant corporation was to provide for his relatives. Whether such object was to be limited by the stated corporate purposes of defendant, or by tax eligibility, or whether the stated corporate purposes were solely designed to secure tax exemption without subordination of such object, is not established as a matter of law on this record. Nor is it established at this time, as a matter of law, that if a trust was created it was lacking in sufficient definiteness as to fund or designation of beneficiaries. Similarly, it is not clear whether the original fund of defendant, or subsequent gifts to defendant by the founder were conditioned on benefiting his relatives. If so, the claim of *ultra vires*and the character of defendant’s stated corporate purposes may not suffice to defeat plaintiffs’ claims, because the fund or gifts before or at the time they vested in defendant would have been subjected to the trust purpose. This, like the other issues, is a mixed question of law and fact not determinable on this record. Quite different, of course, would be the situation if the claim and fact is that defendant corporation alone created the alleged trust. In that event, the defense of *ultra vires*is crucial, and may be determinative. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Compass 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 15, 2015

No. 04-14-00874-CV

Juan Alberto CASTILLO and Ana L. Perez,

Appellants

v.

COMPASS BANK,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CVD-000024-L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The court reporter’s notification of late record is GRANTED. The reporter’s record is 

due on February 6, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### Part B—Implementation
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Antonio M. Perez, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Eastman Kodak Company; and





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.












/s/ Antonio M. PerezAntonio M. PerezChief Executive Officer







Date:          October 18, 2013
#### STATE v. MORGANHERRING

No. 340A95

Case below: Wake County Superior Court

Application by defendant (Morganherring) for writ of habeas corpus dismissed as moot 15 October 1997.
### §1586. Certain acts prohibited

It shall be unlawful for any person—

(a) To sell or offer for sale—

(1) any seed for seeding purposes if imported under this subchapter for other than seeding purposes;

(2) any screenings of any seeds for seeding purposes if imported under this subchapter for other than seeding purposes; or

(3) any seed which is prohibited entry under the provisions of this chapter.

(b) To make any false or misleading representation with respect to any seed subject to this subchapter being imported into the United States or offered for import: Provided, That this subsection shall not be deemed violated by any person if the false or misleading representation is the name of a variety indistinguishable in appearance from the seed being imported or offered for import and the records and other pertinent facts reveal that such person relied in good faith upon representations with respect to the name of the indistinguishable variety made by the shipper of the seed.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title III, §304, formerly §306, 53 Stat. 1285; Pub. L. 85–581, §15, Aug. 1, 1958, 72 Stat. 479; renumbered §304, Pub. L. 97–439, §5(b)(4), Jan. 8, 1983, 96 Stat. 2288; Pub. L. 103–465, title IV, §441(4), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4973.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a)(4) to (7). Pub. L. 103–465, §441(4)(A), struck out pars. (4) to (7) which read as follows:

"(4) any seed which has been stained to resemble seed stained in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and the rules and regulations made and promulgated thereunder;

"(5) any seed stained under the provisions of this chapter and the rules and regulations made and promulgated thereunder, when mixed with seed of the same kind produced in the United States;

"(6) any seed stained with different colors;

"(7) any seed stained under the provisions of this chapter, the labeling of which states that such seed is adapted."

Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 103–465, §441(4)(B), (C), redesignated subsec. (c) as (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: "To change the proportion of seeds stained under the provisions of this chapter and the rules and regulations made and promulgated thereunder or to alter, modify, conceal, or remove in any manner or by any means the color of such stained seeds."

1958—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 85–581 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective on the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), except as otherwise provided, see section 451 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3601 of Title 19, Customs Duties.

#### Effective Date

See section 1610 of this title.
#### STATE v. HUFFMAN

No. 547P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 562

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 March 1998.
#### SMITH v. LEHIGH VALLEY R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 13, 1903.)

Action by Porter D. Smith, administrator, against the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion for re-argument denied, with $10 costs and disbursements. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.
[ARTICLE] 9
[MULTIPLIER] 1,000
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1996
[CASH]                                          40,132
[INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS]                         838,867
[FED-FUNDS-SOLD]                                     0
[TRADING-ASSETS]                                     0
[INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE]                    138,199
[INVESTMENTS-CARRYING]                          97,831
[INVESTMENTS-MARKET]                           102,388
[LOANS]                                      1,037,059
[ALLOWANCE]                                     15,431
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               1,397,169
[DEPOSITS]                                     951,910
[SHORT-TERM]                                   208,681
[LIABILITIES-OTHER]                             22,342
[LONG-TERM]                                     94,825
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                            3,551
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                             0
[OTHER-SE]                                     115,860
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY]               1,397,169
[INTEREST-LOAN]                                 96,825
[INTEREST-INVEST]                               12,584
[INTEREST-OTHER]                                 1,838
[INTEREST-TOTAL]                               111,247
[INTEREST-DEPOSIT]                              35,142
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              53,477
[INTEREST-INCOME-NET]                           57,770
[LOAN-LOSSES]                                    2,410
[SECURITIES-GAINS]                               1,401
[EXPENSE-OTHER]                                 51,785
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 11,690
[INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY]                      11,690
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                     7,059
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                     1.99
[EPS-DILUTED]                                     1.99
[YIELD-ACTUAL]                                    8.38
[LOANS-NON]                                     23,385
[LOANS-PAST]                                     2,379
[LOANS-TROUBLED]                                     0
[LOANS-PROBLEM]                                      0
[ALLOWANCE-OPEN]                                14,576
[CHARGE-OFFS]                                    1,905
[RECOVERIES]                                       350
[ALLOWANCE-CLOSE]                               15,431
[ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC]                            14,338
[ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN]                                  0
[ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED]                          1,093
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (A
             separate certification is required for each officer)

I, Olivier Meisel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BNP U.S. Funding
L.L.C.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which the report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based upon such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2004

                                              /s/ Olivier Meisel
                                              --------------------------
                                              Title: President and Director
Exhibit            10.1     

REVISED SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND COMPLETE RELEASE OF LIABILITY

 

| 1. | PARTIES: |
|----|----------|

JAMES METZGER (“METZGER”), and Energy Conversion Devices, Inc., Ovonic Battery Company and United Solar Ovonic, LLC and their subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates and joint ventures (collectively referred to as “ECD”), have mutually agreed to change their employment relationship and to provide certain benefits when employment is to be terminated at a future date.

| 2. | CONSIDERATION: |
|----|----------------|

ECD will provide the following benefits as a result of the resignation of METZGER from his position of Executive Vice President of ECD, effective December 31, 2007.

|   | A. | MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVE TO COBASYS: |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------|

METZGER will continue to provide services on behalf of ECD in the capacity as an ECD representative to the Management Committee of COBASYS LLC (“COBASYS”) and to assist management in connection with the potential sale or dissolution of COBASYS (in such capacity as the “ECD Representative”).  This representative position shall be without further compensation beyond the terms of this Agreement and METZGER will serve at the pleasure of the President and CEO of ECD.  METZGER will work out of his home in Connecticut and will be reimbursed for ordinary and necessary business expenses within the guidelines of ECD, including travel expenses.  Ordinary business expenses do not include home office expenses, cell phone expenses or first class travel expenses.  All expenses must be approved and reimbursement sought through submission of business expenses with required documentation toECD.  METZGER will resign his position of Executive Vice President with ECD effective December 31, 2007.

|   | B. | STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK AWARDS: |
|--------|----|---------------------------------|

Attached as Schedule A is a complete list of the stock options and stock awards granted to METZGER and outstanding as of the date hereof.   Subject to the vesting set forth below, such stock options and stock awards will continue in effect and be exercisable from and after December 31, 2007 and for so long as METZGER continues to serve as an ECD Representative, and such service shall be counted towards the vesting schedule of such stock options and stock awards, as provided in and pursuant to the terms of such stock options and stock awards; provided, however, that there is no guarantee that the vesting requirements will be met with continued service through the vesting 

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStudy of solar array switching power management technology for space power systemThis report documents work performed on the Solar Array Switching Power Management Study. Mission characteristics for three missions were defined to the depth necessary to determine their power management requirements. Solar array switching concepts were identified that could safisfy the mission requirements. These switching concepts were compared with a conventional buck regulator system on the basis of cost, weight and volume, reliability, efficiency and thermal control. For the missions reviewed, solar array switching provided significant advantages in all areas of comparison.Document ID19840014953Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCassinelli, J. E.*(TRW Space Technology Labs. Redondo Beach, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1982Subject CategoryEnergy Production And ConversionReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:167890-EXEC-SUMNASA-CR-167890-EXEC-SUMTRW-37243-EXEC-SUMAccession Number84N23021Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-22656Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840014953.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Ward V. Smith, Respondent, v. Ray C. Vaughn, Appellant.

— -Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Appeal from judgment of Steuben Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denied motions to dismiss the complaint, for a directed verdict, and to set aside the verdict as against the weight of evidence.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpem, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kelly,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 13, 2011

0112 

# Order

January 13, 2011

139856

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139856 COA: 284512 Monroe CC: 07-036291-FH CHARLES V. FACKELMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, leave to appeal was granted, 486 Mich 907 (2010), and this case was argued as part of th e November 2010 session calendar. It now appears to this
Court that the case of Michigan v Bryant , cert granted 130 S Ct 1685 (2010), is pending before the United States Suprem e Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present case. We ORDER that the disposition of this appeal be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                      THE WESTERN TRANSMEDIA COMPANY, INC.

                Under Section 242 of the General Corporation Law

================================================================================

         It is hereby certified that:

         1. The name of the corporation is The Western Transmedia Company,  Inc.
(the "Corporation").

         2. The amendment of the certificate of  incorporation  effected by this
certificate of amendment is to change the name of the Corporation.

         3.  To  accomplish  the  foregoing  amendment,  Article  FIRST  of  the
certificate of incorporation, relating to the name of the Corporation, is hereby
stricken out in its entirety,  and the following new Article is  substituted  in
lieu thereof:

         "FIRST:  The name of the  corporation is The Western Systems Corp. (the
"Corporation")."

         4. The amendment of the certificate of  incorporation  herein certified
has been duly adopted in accordance  with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         Signed and attested to on January 2, 1997.

                                  THE WESTERN TRANSMEDIA COMPANY, INC.


                                  /s/ Stuart M. Pellman
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  Stuart M. Pellman
                                  President & Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:

/s/ Ann C.W. Green
------------------
Ann C.W. Green
Assistant Secretary
#### § 536.37 Importance of the claims investigation.

Prompt and thorough investigation will be conducted on all potential and actual claims for and against the government. Evidence developed during an investigation provides the basis for every subsequent step in the administrative settlement of a claim or in the pursuit of a lawsuit. Claims personnel must gather and record adverse as well as favorable information. The CJA, claims attorney or unit claims officer must preserve their legal and factual findings.
#### § 552.150 Purpose.

This part is punitive in nature and applies to all persons assigned to, attached to, or present on the installation of Fort Jackson, South Carolina. A violation of, attempted violation of, or solicitation or conspiracy to violate any provision of this part provides the basis for criminal prosecution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, applicable Federal Law, other regulations, and/or adverse administrative action. Civilian visitors may be barred from the installation of Fort Jackson and prosecuted under appropriate Federal laws. The enumeration of prohibited activities in this part is not intended to preclude prosecution under other provisions of law or regulation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      732
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            25,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                945
<INVENTORY>                              15,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         50,047
<PP&E>                                   17,545
<DEPRECIATION>                           12,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           64,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    23,629
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  2,346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                               20,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             64,893
<SALES>                                  34,346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         34,346
<CGS>                                    26,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            26,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          6,740
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           1,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                442
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         885
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                885
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.15



</TABLE>