alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                        19,447
<SECURITIES>                                  14,562
<RECEIVABLES>                                 34,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                  361
<INVENTORY>                                   8,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              79,797
<PP&E>                                        62,489
<DEPRECIATION>                                49,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                109,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         33,844
<BONDS>                                       39,332
<COMMON>                                      8,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   65
<OTHER-SE>                                    21,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  109,714
<SALES>                                       23,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              23,322
<CGS>                                         17,056
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 21,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              25
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              12
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,905
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           1,628
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,628
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .22
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York v. John Patrick Hughes.

Motion for an enlargement of time granted and the time within which the appeal may be perfected is enlarged to the March 1961 Term of this court. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER III—DAIRY
#### Ida Marks, appellee, v. Sons and Daughters of Abraham, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,556.

Action on insurance certificate. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edward E. Laughlin, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 3, 1925.

Freundlich & Froehlich, for appellant.

Sonnenschein, Berkson, Lautmann & Levinson, for appellee; Bernard Nath, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
#### In the Matter of Henry Laykind (Admitted as Henry G. Laykind), an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.

First Department,

June 30, 1964.

*John G. Bonomi*of counsel *(Richard A. Nachman*with him on the brief), for petitioner.

No appearance by respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent was admitted to practice in the First Department on April 11, 1932.

On October 4, 1962 respondent was admonished for the conversion of funds belonging to a client representing the proceeds of a claim for personal injuries. Respondent made restitution thereon after issuing his check to the client which was returned on two occasions for insufficient funds.

Respondent has converted escrow funds in the total amount of $1,993.80. There is outstanding an unsatisfied judgment thereon against respondent in the sum of $2,197.20.

Respondent has ignored requests of petitioner’s Committee on Grievances for explanations concerning four complaints involving conversion of escrow and client’s funds and failure to prosecute matters in which he was retained.

Responde:: t failed to appear before the Referee on the hearing of the charges herein and failed to oppose the motion to confirm the Referee’s report. The record sustains the findings of the Referee and the motion to confirm his report should be granted.

Respondent’s conduct demonstrates he is no longer qualified to remain a member of the legal profession and that he is indifferent to the consequences of his misconduct. Under the *384circumstances respondent should be disbarred. *(Matter of Bennett,*16 A D 2d 129; *Matter of Schner,*5 A D 2d 599.)

Botein, P. J., Babin, McNally, Eager and Stetjer, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.
### §§1323 to 1325. Repealed. Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title III, §304, 68 Stat. 902

Section 1323, act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §323, 52 Stat. 50, related to amount of farm marketing quota with respect to corn.

Section 1324, act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §324, 52 Stat. 50, related to storage amounts.

Section 1325, act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §325, 52 Stat. 51, related to penalties for marketing corn in excess of quota.
** 
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of UQM Technologies, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ William G. Rankin
William G. Rankin
Chairman, President and    Chief Executive Officer
 

/s/ Donald A. French
Donald A. French
Treasurer, Secretary and    Chief Financial Officer
 
Dated:  May 25, 2004**
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.F.1


                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                                STOCK OPTION PLAN
                           FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

         Pursuant to Sections 2.2 and 9.1 of the El Paso Energy Corporation
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, Amended and Restated Effective as
of January 1, 1998 (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows,
effective April 1, 1998:

         Section 2.1 is amended to read as follows:

         "2.1 Subject to Section 2.2, the maximum number of shares of common
         stock of the Company, $3 par value per share, (the "Common Stock") for
         which options may be granted under the Plan is two hundred thousand
         (200,000) (the "Shares"). The Shares shall be shares held in the
         Company's treasury or out of authorized but unissued shares of the
         Company, or partly out of each, as shall be determined by the Plan
         Administrator, subject to, and reduced by (on a post-split basis), the
         number of shares of Common Stock awarded prior to the occurrence of a
         two-for-one stock split effected by the Company in the form of a 100%
         stock dividend on April 1, 1998."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on this 1st day of April, 1998.


                                      EL PASO ENERGY CORPORATION


                                      By: /s/ JOEL RICHARDS III
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                          Joel Richards III
                                          Executive Vice President
                                          Plan Administrator
Attest:

/s/ David L. Siddall
----------------------------
    David L. Siddall
    Corporate Secretary
#### § 1602.5 Area office staff.

The compensated employees, civilian and military, of the Selective Service System employed in an area office will be referred to as the area office staff.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Preliminary evaluation andanalysis of LTPP faulting data - final report [electronic resource].**
 
pt1|pt2|
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30:00-076

Item Number:0982-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001059435

 
July 17, 2018
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNSI-1 Squib adapter development and final test report for usage on space shuttle gas sampler valve/bottle assembly 3270The possibility of utilizing the NSI-1 squib in place cartridge assembly 2270 for the function of both events required for the Space Shuttle Gas Sampler Valve/Bottle Assembly 3270 was determined. Additionally, it was a requirement that the closure disk of the NSI-1 squib and explosive residue therefrom be retained from the valve cavity in so far as possible to prevent any significant particulate from scratching the valve bore and causing sample leakage following the postfire 2 event.Document ID19840009488Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSiebel, J. E.*(Siebelair Corp. Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJune 15, 1983Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-171735ER-2273-8NAS 1.26:171735Accession Number84N17556Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-16814Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840009488.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 21.615 Assistance.

The transfer of a thing of value to a recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States (*see* 31 U.S.C. 6101(3)). Grants, cooperative agreements, and technology investment agreements are examples of legal instruments used to provide assistance.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBeta systems error analysisThe atmospheric backscatter coefficient, beta, measured with an airborne CO Laser Doppler Velocimeter (LDV) system operating in a continuous wave, focussed model is discussed. The Single Particle Mode (SPM) algorithm, was developed from concept through analysis of an extensive amount of data obtained with the system on board a NASA aircraft. The SPM algorithm is intended to be employed in situations where one particle at a time appears in the sensitive volume of the LDV. In addition to giving the backscatter coefficient, the SPM algorithm also produces as intermediate results the aerosol density and the aerosol backscatter cross section distribution. A second method, which measures only the atmospheric backscatter coefficient, is called the Volume Mode (VM) and was simultaneously employed. The results of these two methods differed by slightly less than an order of magnitude. The measurement uncertainties or other errors in the results of the two methods are examined.Document ID19840013049Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 26, 1984Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:170998NASA-CR-170998Accession Number84N21117Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-35329Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840013049.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### George J. Haberer, defendant in error, v. Albert Fuchs, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 29,111.

Suit for real estate broker’s commission. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Lee W. Carrier, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Brown, Alschuler & Reagh, for plaintiff in error.

Mather, Hutson & Traeger, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Richmond Gaddis, Appellant, against Thomas Crumpe et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, • by default, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
# C_2008079EN.01000201.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 31 January 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) — Centro Europa 7 Srl v Ministero delle Comunicazioni e Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Direzione Generale Autorizzazioni e Concessioni Ministero delle Comunicazioni

(Case C-380/05) (1)

1

(Freedom to provide services - Electronic communications - Television broadcasting activities - New common regulatory framework - Allocation of radio frequencies)

(2008/C 79/02)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Centro Europa 7 Srl

Applicant:

Defendants: Ministero delle Comunicazioni e Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Direzione Generale Autorizzazioni e Concessioni Ministero delle Comunicazioni

Defendants:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consiglio di Stato — Interpretation of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21) and Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33) — Interpretation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights — Obligation on Member States, in the sector of television broadcasting activities, to ensure access to networks and maintain multiplicity of undertakings on the market — National regulations allowing the grant of individual rights to undertakings not authorised under the national plan determining the licensees of television broadcasting services and not allowing an undertaking authorised under the national plan to carry on its activities

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 EC and, from the date on which they became applicable, Article 9(1) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive), Article 5(1), the second subparagraph of Article 5(2) and Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive), and Article 4 of Commission Directive 2002/77/EC of 16 September 2002 on competition in the markets for electronic communications networks and services must be interpreted as precluding, in television broadcasting matters, national legislation the application of which makes it impossible for an operator holding rights to broadcast in the absence of broadcasting radio frequencies granted on the basis of objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 14.1.2006.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 28, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 8 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-66, CP2021-68.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2020-29318 Filed 1-6-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### McKONE, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF WARSAW, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 1, 1903.)

Action by Henry T. McKone against the village of Warsaw.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

McLENNAN, P. J., dissents.
### SUBCHAPTER V—ANIMAL HEALTH AND DISEASE RESEARCH
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1561 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1561

  Condemning President Biden's remarks referring to President Trump's 
                       supporters as ``garbage''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 1, 2024

Mr. Rose (for himself, Mr. Self, Ms. Hageman, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Sessions, 
  Mr. Ogles, Mr. Babin, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Meuser, and Mr. 
Fleischmann) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Condemning President Biden's remarks referring to President Trump's 
                       supporters as ``garbage''.

Whereas, on October 29, 2024, President Biden stated, ``The only garbage I see 
        floating around there is his supporters'', referring to supporters of 
        President Trump: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives condemns President 
Biden's remarks referring to President Trump's supporters as 
``garbage''.
                                 <all>
```
## Subtitle I—National Park System
EXHIBIT 21

                                ROUNDY'S, INC.
                                 Subsidiaries


Roundy's, Inc. has eleven wholly-owned first-tier subsidiaries, each a
Wisconsin corporation (except as otherwise noted) doing business under their
corporate names.  These subsidiaries are:


Badger Assurance, Ltd. (1)           Mega Marts, Inc.
Holt Public Storage, Inc.            Midland Grocery of Michigan, Inc.(5)
I.T.A., Inc.                         Ropak, Inc.
Jondex Corp.                         Scot Lad Foods, Inc.
Kee Trans, Inc.                      The Copps Corporation
                                     Ultra Mart Foods, Inc.


Four Wisconsin corporations doing business under their corporate names
are wholly owned subsidiaries of Ropak, Inc.  These corporations are:


Insurance Planners, Inc.              Rindt Enterprises, Inc.
Pick 'n Save Warehouse Foods, Inc.    Shop-Rite, Inc.


Three corporations doing business under their corporate names are wholly
owned subsidiaries of Scot Lad Foods, Inc.  These corporations are:


Spring Lake Merchandise, Inc. (3)     Cardinal Foods, Inc.(4)
Scot Lad-Lima, Inc.(3)


Two corporations doing business under their corporate names are subsidiaries
of Shop-Rite, Inc.  These corporations are:


The Midland Grocery Company (3)(6)    Village Market, LLC (2)


One corporation doing business under its corporate name is a 50% owned
subsidiary of Jondex Corp.  The corporation is:

Clintonville Land Co., LLC (7)

-------------

(1) A Bermuda corporation.         (4) A Delaware corporation.
(2) An Indiana limited liability   (5) A Michigan corporation.
    company.                       (6) Partially owned by Cardinal
(3) An Ohio corporation.               Foods, Inc.
                                   (7) A Wisconsin limited liability
                                       company.
#### § 553.5 Maintaining order.

The Executive Director may order the removal from, and bar the re-entry onto, Army National Military Cemeteries of any person who acts in violation of any law or regulation, including but not limited to demonstrations and disturbances as outlined in 38 U.S.C. 2413, and in this part. This authority may not be re-delegated.