alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### [§913. Omitted]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 398, providing for decision without debate with respect to motions to postpone, motions to proceed to the consideration of other business, and appeals from decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate or the House of Representatives, was omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 95–17, §2, Apr. 6, 1977, 91 Stat. 29. See section 912 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          40,162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,320
<INVENTORY>                                     43,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,167
<PP&E>                                          81,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 327,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,761
<BONDS>                                        275,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,214
<OTHER-SE>                                   (309,795)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   327,712
<SALES>                                        316,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               316,919
<CGS>                                          114,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,078
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,117
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
Filed 10/3/00 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2000 ND 172

City of Fargo, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Douglas Joseph Hersch, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20000108

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Timothy M. O'Keeffe, City Prosecutor, 1129 5th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1897, Fargo, ND 58107-1897, for plaintiff and appellee.

Richard E. Edinger (argued), P.O. Box 1295, Fargo, ND 58107, and L. Patrick O'Day, Jr. (on brief), 1024 3rd Avenue South, P.O. Box 1727, Fargo, ND 58107, for defendant and appellant.

City of Fargo v. Hersch

No. 20000108

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Douglas Joseph Hersch appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol.  Hersch claims the City of Fargo lacked sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hersch was driving while under the influence of alcohol when the vehicular stop arose from mechanical problems and no blood test was given to determine intoxication.  Based upon the evidence favorable to the judgment of conviction and the reasonable inferences therefrom, we conclude the trial court’s decision is supported by sufficient competent evidence.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom
#### § 147.32 Temporary eligibility for access at the top secret and SCI levels and temporary eligibility for “Q” access authorization: For someone who is not the subject of a current, favorable personnel or personnel-security investigation of any kind.

As a minimum, such temporary eligibility requires completion of the Standard Form 86, including any applicable supporting documentation, favorable review of the form by the appropriate adjudicating authority, immediate submission of a request for an expedited Single Scope Background Investigation (SSBI), and completion and favorable review by the appropriate adjudicating authority of relevant criminal history and investigative records of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and of information in the Security/Suitability Investigations Index (SII) and the Defense Clearance and Investigations Index (DCII).
#### § 939.816 Performance standards—surface mining activities.

Part 816 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Surface Mining Activities,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
### §392. Personal services

The Secretary—

(1) may procure the temporary or intermittent services of experts or consultants (or organizations thereof) in accordance with section 3109 of title 5; and

(2) may, whenever necessary due to an urgent homeland security need, procure temporary (not to exceed 1 year) or intermittent personal services, including the services of experts or consultants (or organizations thereof), without regard to the pay limitations of such section 3109.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §832, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2225.)
No. 7884.

#### Baxter et al. *v.*Hewitt et al.

(Decided October 13, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Richland county.

*Messrs. Bruclcer & Cummins,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Jenner & Weldon,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.38

                  Director Compensation--Revised and Restated

All directors of Temecula Valley Bank ("Bank") are entitled to receive $1,500
per month in consideration for their services as Bank board members. The board
authorized an increase in these fees, effective February 2, 2006, to $1,750 per
month.

Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc. ("Company") may also periodically award options to
its directors under its 2004 Incentive Stock Option Plan, or otherwise.

In addition to regular Bank board compensation, members of the audit committee
of the Company are entitled to receive $250 per month in consideration for their
services on this committee. The board authorized an increase in these fees,
effective February 2, 2006 to $350 per month.

In addition to regular board compensation, members (previously reported in error
as non-employee members) of the directors' loan committee of the Bank are
entitled to receive $250 per month in consideration for their services on this
committee. The board authorized an increase in these fees, effective February 2,
2006 to $350 per month.
§ 260.5 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (PDUSD(P&R)), under the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall establish policies and procedures and monitor the Vending Facility Program.
( b ) The Heads of the DoD Components, in monitoring their respective programs, shall: ( 1 ) Approve or disapprove State licensing agency applications for permits and the provision of satisfactory sites;
( 2 ) Issue policies and procedures to designate and establish responsibilities of the on-site official;
( 3 ) Suspend or terminate a permit to operate a vending facility after consulting with the PDUSD(P&R) where circumstances warrant.
( 4 ) Ensure appropriate real property outgrants are accomplished in accordance with DoDI 4165.70, “Real Property Management,”[1] and consistent with the Randolph-Sheppard Act (20 U.S.C. 107) and the implementing regulations (34 CFR part 395).
( 5 ) The On-Site Official shall be the point of contact with State licensing agencies and shall: ( i ) Consult with State licensing agencies on articles and services to be provided;
( ii ) Establish appropriate limitations on the location or operation of a vending facility upon finding that the granting of a priority under the Act would adversely affect the interests of the United States. The On-Site Official shall justify this limitation in writing through the Head of the DoD Component concerned and the PDUSD(P&R) to the Secretary of Education for determination of whether the limitation is warranted.
( iii ) Notify State licensing agencies of acquisition or substantial alteration or renovation of property;
( iv ) Negotiate with State licensing agencies on other matters and adhere to guidance provided in § 260.6 of this part.
Footnotes -
260.5
[1] Available from *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/416570.htm .*
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-9420, 33- 17594 and 33-64421) of Ben & Jerry's Homemade,  Inc.
of our report dated January 27, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Ben & Jerry's Homemade,  Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 28, 1996.



                                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 1997
Exhibit 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Zond-PanAero Windsystem Partners I (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Eric D. Gadd, Chief Executive Officer of Zond Windsystems
Management LLC, as General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except that the Report was not
     timely filed and the Report is a comprehensive Form 10-K for the years
     ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Partnership.


Date: May 10, 2004
                                   /s/ ERIC D. GADD
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Eric D. Gadd
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   Zond Windsystems Management LLC, as General
                                   Partner of Zond-PanAero Windsystem Partners I
### §6321. Absence of veterans to attend funeral services

An employee in or under an Executive agency who is a veteran of a war, or of a campaign or expedition for which a campaign badge has been authorized, or a member of an honor or ceremonial group of an organization of those veterans, may be excused from duty without loss of pay or deduction from annual leave for the time necessary, not to exceed 4 hours in any one day, to enable him to participate as an active pallbearer or as a member of a firing squad or a guard of honor in a funeral ceremony for a member of the armed forces whose remains are returned from abroad for final interment in the United States.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 521.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 30q. | Aug. 16, 1949, ch. 441, 63 Stat. 608.July 17, 1952, ch. 932, §1, 66 Stat. 758. |

Statutes at Large

July 17, 1952, ch. 932, §1, 66 Stat. 758.

The words "Executive agency" are coextensive with and substituted for "executive branch of the Government" in view of the definition of "Executive agency" in section 105. Applicability to the General Accounting Office is based on former section 933a.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,603,520
<SECURITIES>                                   707,760
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,517,818
<PP&E>                                         267,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                 219,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,593,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20,806
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,632,998
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,060,576)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,572,422
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               82,152
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               108,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (26,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (26,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,838)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.005)



</TABLE>
([ongre~~of tf)e mniteb ~tate~

mllll1)ington. llq[; 20510

January 17,2014

=

The Honorable Anthony Foxx

Secretary

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Secretary Foxx:

'"w

J>

, .,

---!:- ..,.

~~'J~~:~

r';~iTi

~?~~

~~bO

::_>.:-n

;.I.:

We write to express our support for the communities' preferred bids for Essential Air Service

(EAS) to Devils Lake Regional Airport, Devils Lake, North Dakota and Jamestown Regional

Airport, Jamestown, North Dakota.

Both Devils Lake and Jamestown have experienced numerous problems with their current EAS

contract, and have communicated an interest in pursuing a new route option to Denver, which will

provide a competitive option for customers. Because there are fewer regular routes to Denver from

North Dakota, the airports would be well positioned to attract ridership to the nearest major western

hub and subsequent connecting cities.

We want to specifically address two concerns with ,the preferred bids. The first is the increase in

costs per passenger. We recognize that budgetary pressures on the EAS program require the

Department of Transportation (DOT) to be discerning with the allocation of resources; however, we

believe an up-front investment in the preferred EAS bids will yield much higher dividends for the

program and the communities. With the increased attractiveness of the route option, paired with

more reliable service, we are hopeful the popularity of the communities' preferred bids will result in

increased ridership and allow the subsidy cost to fall in future contract periods.

Second, concerns have been raised that the communities' preferred EAS bids fall short of the 12

round trip EAS requirement. We request that you waive this requirement to allow consideration of

the EAS bids. The communities have made abundantly clear in their communications with the DOT

that they will accept a lower number of round trips in exchange for more reliable service. The

preferred EAS bids to Devils Lake and Jamestown would provide daily service, strongly fulfilling

the DOT's mandate to provide the EAS communities with access to the national air transportation

system.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important issue. If you have any questions or

require additional information, please feel free to contact our offices for assistance.

Sincerely,

~

U.S. Senator

J~~~~~

U.S. Senator

lt7~

U.S. Representative

Cc: Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs, U.S.

Department of Transportation

Dennis DeVaney, Chief, Essential Air Service and Domestic Analysis Division, U.S.

Department of Transportation
### §§74 to 81. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 74, act Jan. 22, 1923, ch. 28, 42 Stat. 1142, provided that net proceeds of sales of useless ordnance material by Navy Department should be covered into Treasury as "Miscellaneous receipts". See section 8763 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 75, act Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 391, §1, 37 Stat. 589, related to payment for transfers of ordnance or stores to bureaus or departments.

Section 76, act June 20, 1878, ch. 359, §1, 20 Stat. 223, authorized private use of a machine for testing iron and steel.

Section 77, acts Mar. 3, 1885, ch. 360, 23 Stat. 502; May 29, 1928, ch. 901, par. 27, 45 Stat. 988, regulated tests of iron and steel and other materials for industrial purposes.

Section 78, act June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §123, 39 Stat. 215, related to gauges, dies, and tools for manufacture of arms.

Section 79, act June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §124, 39 Stat. 215, related to nitrate plants.

Section 80, act June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §120, 39 Stat. 213, 214, related to procurement of war material and mobilization of industries. See sections 4882 to 4884, 4892, and 4971 of Title 10.

Section 81, act May 14, 1928, ch. 544, 45 Stat. 509, authorized Secretary of War to secure assistance, whenever practicable, of Geological Survey, Coast and Geodetic Survey, or other mapping agencies of the Government in execution of military surveys and maps. Provisions similar to former section 81 were contained in the following appropriation acts:

Mar. 23, 1928, ch. 232, title I, 45 Stat. 342.

Feb. 23, 1927, ch. 167, title I, 44 Stat. 1123.

Apr. 15, 1926, ch. 146, title I, 44 Stat. 273.

Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 225, title I, 43 Stat. 911.

June 7, 1924, ch. 291, title I, 43, Stat. 496.

Mar. 2, 1923, ch. 178, title I, 42 Stat. 1402.

June 30, 1922, ch. 253, title I, 42 Stat. 741.
""

""

""

""

""

""

""

""

""

""

""

""

""

#0 #0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

Truckee

Sierraville

East

Sierraville

West

Donner

Summit

Reservoirs

Sierraville

North

Yuba NE

Yuba NW

South

of 20

Yuba

West

Lafayette

Bowman

Black

Buttes

Barker

Foresthill

East

Foresthill

West

Summit

West

Foresthill

North

Yuba

South

Granite

Chief

Wilderness

North Fork

American Wild

And Scenic River

#0 Plowed Parking Areas

 Pacific Crest Trail Designated Crossings

Pacific Crest Trail (OSV Use Prohibited)

Designated OSV Trails Available for Grooming

Designated OSV Trails Not Available for Grooming

Marked, Ungroomed OSV Trails

OSV Trail Not Under Forest Service Jurisdiction

Designated OSV Use on National Forest System Lands

under Alternative 2

Tahoe National Forest Ranger Districts

OSV Area Names

0 1 2 4 6 8

Miles

®

Alternative 2

T a h o e N a t i o n a l F o r e s t

T a h o e N a t i o n a l F o r e s t

O v e r - S n o w V e h i c l e U s e D e s i g n a t i o n O v e r - S n o w V e h i c l e U s e D e s i g n a t i o n

The USDA Forest Service uses the most current and complete data available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary.

GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results. The

Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update, modify or replace GIS products without notification.

----

Land status is correct as of August 8, 2017. Subsequently land may be acquired or exchanged. Any acquired lands will be

managed in accordance with the management prescriptions for the area within which they occur. Designations do not

apply to private lands.
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

McEwen Mining Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements: Nos. 333-144563, 333-144569, 333-112269, 333-36600, 333-179144 and 333-179143 on Form S-8; No. 333-182192 on Form S-3; and No. 333-178306 on Form S-4 of McEwen Mining Inc. of our reports dated March 6, 2013 on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in the December 31, 2012 annual report on Form 10-K of McEwen Mining Inc.

 

 

***/s/ KPMG LLP***

 

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

Toronto, Canada

 

March 10, 2014

 

----
H. Res. 1204 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 7, 2024. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. Kennedy (to 

rank immediately after Mr. Suozzi). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Power Company LLC (Duke Power) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James L. Turner, Group Executive and Chief Commercial Officer of Duke Power, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Power.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/    JAMES L. TURNER                      
|James L. Turner                             
|Group Executive and Chief Commercial Officer
|                                            
|May 9, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio J. Solivan, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 421]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J. Connell, J), rendered April 2, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed. Present—Gorski, J.P, Martoche, Centra, Lunn and Green, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 44—WOOL PROGRAM**