alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2








The following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 and is not filed as provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission.




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics Research Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:




(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April 29, 2011
/s/ David KeleherSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                                                      0000315621
<NAME>                                                     WEDGESTONE FINANCIAL
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000
       
<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                                     365
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              6,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                               256
<INVENTORY>                                                4,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           11,392
<PP&E>                                                     12,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                             7,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             21,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      6,475
<BONDS>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                   21,886
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (16,139)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               21,398
<SALES>                                                    46,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           46,112
<CGS>                                                      31,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              31,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           12,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           29
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         1,340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            587
<INCOME-TAX>                                               (1,258)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        1,845
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                               1,845
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .08
        

</TABLE>
(Mark One)

[X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

     

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

     

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of theSecurities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)of the Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for suchshorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 

Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check mark ifdisclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) containedherein, and will not be contained, to the best of theregistrant's knowledge in definitive proxy or information statementsincorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K. [X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantis a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No[X]

 

State the aggregate marketvalue of the voting and non-voting partnership interests held by non-affiliatescomputed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were lastsold, or the average bid and asked price of such partnership interests as of thelast business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscalquarter.  No market exists for the limited partnership interests of theRegistrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can bedetermined.

 

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE**

**None**

** **
### §1445b–3a. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §171(b)(2)(D), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 938

Section, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title I, §107B, as added Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, title III, §301(3), 104 Stat. 3382; amended Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–508, title I, §§1101(a), 1102(a), 104 Stat. 1388–1; Dec. 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–237, title I, §§102(d), 103(b), 106(d), 113(6), 105 Stat. 1822, 1823, 1826, 1837; Aug. 10, 1993, Pub. L. 103–66, title I, §1102, 107 Stat. 314; Oct. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–354, title I, §119(a)(5), 108 Stat. 3207, related to loans, payments, and acreage reduction programs for 1991 through 1995 crops of wheat.
Exhibit 23.2

                 Consent of Independent Auditors'




The Board of Directors
Unique Mobility, Inc:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-61166, 33-63399, 333-01919, 333-13883 and 333-23843) on Form S-3 and
in the registration statements (Nos. 33-23113, 33-24071, 33-34612, 33-35055,
33-34613, 33-41325, 33-64852, 34-47454, 33-81430, and 33-92288) on Form S-8
of Unique Mobility, Inc. of our report dated January 16, 1997 relating to the
balance sheets of Taiwan UQM Electric Co., Ltd. as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1996,
which report appears in the March 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Unique Mobility, Inc.


                                   Horwath & Co.


Taipei, Republic of China
June 25, 1997
#### W. E. GARRISON CO. v. LEE PAVING CO.

No. 404P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 833

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
#### Roy J. Baranski, appellee, v. Yellow Cab Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,903.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in being struck by defendant’s taxicab. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John P. MeGoorty, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

Moloney & Postelnek, John E. Kehoe and Busby, Weber, Miller & Donovan, for appellant; Benjamin Samuels, of counsel.

James C. McShane, for appellee; George H. Meyer, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 552.70 Applications by companies to solicit on installations in foreign countries. ( a ) Each May and June only, DOD accepts applications from commercial life insurance companies for accreditation to solicit the purchase of commercial life insurance on installations in foreign countries for the fiscal year beginning the following October.
( b ) Information about permission to solicit on installations outside the United States (exclusive of its territories and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico) is contained in instructions issued by DOD. Applications and any correspondence relating thereto should be addressed to Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower, Reserve Affairs, and Logistics), ATTN: Directorate, Personnel Services, ODASD(MPP), WASH DC 20301.
( c ) Advice of action taken by DOD is announced annually by letters sent to overseas commanders as soon as practicable after 15 September. The list of companies and agents may vary from year to year.
Exhibit 4.26


 


STATE OF DELAWARE


CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION


 


Crdentia Corp., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


 


DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:


 


1. The name of the corporation is Crdentia Corp.


 


2. That a Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the corporation was filed by the Secretary of State of
Delaware on March 20, 2006 and that said Certificate requires correction as
permitted by Section 103 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.


 


3. The inaccuracy or defect of said Certificate to be corrected is as
follows:


 


The combination of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock effected
by said Certificate should be effective as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April
4, 2006, not as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on March 30, 2006.


 


4. Article IV Paragraph (A) of the Certificate is corrected to read as
follows:


 


“(A)  Classes of Stock. This
corporation is authorized to issue two classes, denominated Common Stock and
Preferred Stock. The Common Stock shall have a par value of $0.0001 per share
and the Preferred Stock shall have a par value of $0.0001 per share. The total
number of shares of Common Stock which this corporation is authorized to issue
is one hundred fifty million (150,000,000), and the total number of shares of
Preferred Stock which this corporation is authorized to issue is ten million
(10,000,000). Effective as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 4, 2006, each
ten (10) shares of this corporation’s Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per
share, issued and outstanding shall, automatically and without any action on
the part of the respective holders thereof, be combined and converted into one
(1) share of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of this corporation. No
fractional shares shall be issued and, in lieu thereof, any holder of less than
one share of Common Stock shall be entitled to receive cash for such holder’s
fractional share based upon the fair market value of the Common Stock as of the
date this Certificate of Amendment is filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware as determined by this corporation’s Board of Directors.”


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Crdentia Corp. has caused this certificate to be
signed by its Chief Financial Officer as of April 3, 2006.


 


 


	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   /s/ James J. TerBeest

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  James J. TerBeest,

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Financial Officer
2 So.2d 188

#### In re DELTA DEVELOPMENT CO., Inc., et al.

No. 36141.

April 28, 1941.

Fred A. Middleton, of New Orleans, for relators.

Eugene Stanley, Atty. Gen., J. Bernard Cocke, Dist. Atty., of New Orleans, and W. C. Perrault, Asst. Atty. Gen. (James J. Morrison and L. F. Wingerter, both of New Orleans, of counsel), for respondents.

PONDER, Justice.

This is a companion case to In re Louisiana Coastal Lands, Inc., et al., 2 So.2d 184.1 The issues and facts in both cases are identical, and the only difference between *713them is that different defendants are involved.

For the reásons assigned in In re Louisiana Coastal Lands, Inc., et al., 2 So.2d 184,1this cause is remanded to the lower court in order that the subpoena duces tecum may be modified consistent with the views therein expressed.

1

197 La. 701.

O’NIELL, Chief Justice

(concurring).

I concur in the opinion that the judge of the criminal district court should modify his order to produce the books and records of the corporation, so as to make the order a reasonable one; but, inasmuch as this investigation is in the nature of a criminal proceeding, being conducted under the provisions of article 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, I do not consider the articles of the Code of Practice, relating to writs of subpoena duces tecum, as being applicable to this case.
§ 241.8 Terms and conditions. ( a ) A DoD employee assigned under this part: ( 1 ) Remains a Federal employee without loss of employee rights and benefits attached to that status. These include, but are not limited to: ( i ) Consideration for promotion;
( ii ) Leave accrual;
( iii ) Continuation of retirement benefits and health, life, and long-term care insurance benefits; and
( iv ) Pay increases the employee otherwise would have received if he or she had not been assigned;
( 2 ) Remains covered for purposes of the Federal Tort Claims Act, and for purposes of injury compensation as described in 5 U.S.C. chapter 81; and
( 3 ) Is subject to any action that may impact the employee's position while he or she is assigned.
( b ) An employee of a private sector organization: ( 1 ) May continue to receive pay and benefits from the private sector organization from which such employee is assigned;
( 2 ) Is deemed to be an employee of the DoD for the purposes of: ( i ) Chapter 73 of title 5, United States Code (Suitability, Security, and Conduct);
( ii ) Sections 201 (Bribery of Public Officials and Witnesses), 203 (Compensation to Members of Congress, Officers and Employees Against and Other Matters Affecting the Government), 205 (Activities of Officers and Employees in Claims Against Other Matters Affecting the Government), 207 (Restrictions on Former Officers, Employees, and Elected Officials of the Executive and Legislative Branches), 208 (Acts Affecting a Personal Financial Interest), 209 (Salary of Government Officials and Employees Payable only by the United States), 603 (Making Political Contributions), 606 (Intimidation to Secure Political Contributions), 607, (Place of Solicitation), 643 (Accounting Generally for Public Money), 654 (Officer or Employee of the United States Converting Property of Another, 1905 (Disclosure of Confidential Information Generally), and 1913 (Lobbying with Appropriated Moneys) of title 18, United States Code;
( iii ) Sections 1343, 1344, and 1349(b) of title 31, United States Code;
( iv ) The Federal Tort Claims Act and any other Federal tort liability statute;
( v ) The Ethics in Government Act of 1978;
( vi ) Section 1043 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
( vii ) Section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act; and
( 3 ) May not have access to any trade secrets or to any other nonpublic information which is of commercial value to the private sector organization from which he or she is assigned;
( 4 ) Is subject to such regulations as the President may prescribe;
( 5 ) Is covered by 5 U.S.C. chapter 81, Compensation for Work Injuries; and
( 6 ) Does not have any right or expectation for Federal employment solely on the basis of his or her assignment.
#### § 585.236 If I have a limited lease, how long will my lease remain in effect?

(a) For limited leases, the lease periods are as shown in the following table:

| Lease period | Extension or suspension | Requirements |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Each limited lease has a preliminary period of 12 months within which to submit a GAP. The preliminary period begins on the effective date of the lease | If we receive a GAP that satisfies the requirements of §§ 585.640 through 585.648, the preliminary period will be automatically extended for the period of time necessary for us to conduct a technical and environmental review of the GAP | The GAP must meet the requirements of §§ 585.640 through 585.648. |
| (2) Each limited lease has an operations period as specified by BOEM (if the lease is issued competitively) or negotiated with the applicant (if the lease is issued noncompetitively). In either case, the duration of the operations period will depend on the intended use of the lease. The operations period begins on the date that we approve your GAP | We may order or grant a suspension of the operations period as provided in §§ 585.415 through 585.421 | |

(b) You may request an extension of any of the lease periods outlined in paragraph (a) of this section for good cause. In its discretion, BOEM may approve your request.
DSpace Repository

# The distributional ecology and zoogeographical relationships of stomatopod Crustacea from Pacific Costa Rica

Login

      -  DSpace Home 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions Series 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences 
      - →
      - View Item

# The distributional ecology and zoogeographical relationships of stomatopod Crustacea from Pacific Costa Rica

Reaka, M. L.Manning, Raymond B.

DOI:					https://doi.org/10.5479/si.01960768.7.1

Date:					1980

### Citation:					

The distributional ecology and zoogeographical relationships of stomatopod Crustacea from Pacific Costa Rica*Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences*https://doi.org/10.5479/si.01960768.7.1

### Description:					

Show full item record

## Files in this item

Name:SCMS-0007-Hi_res.pdf

Size:16.67Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCMS-0007-Lo_res.pdf

Size:903.9Kb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCMS-0007.epub

Size:274.1Kb

Format:Unknown

Description:ePub

View/Open

Name:SCMS-0007.mobi

Size:598.6Kb

Format:Unknown

Description:mobi

View/Open

## This item appears in the following Collection(s)

            -  Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences  [43]  

# Search DSpace

# Browse

              -  All of DSpace                  -  Communities & Collections 
                -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 
              -  This Collection                  -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 

# My Account

              -  Login 

Terms of UsePrivacyContact UsSend Feedback

DSpace softwareDuraSpace

Theme by
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIcing Simulation Research Supporting the Ice-Accretion Testing of Large-Scale Swept-Wing ModelsThe work summarized in this report is a continuation of NASA's Large-Scale, Swept-Wing Test Articles Fabrication; Research and Test Support for NASA IRT contract (NNC10BA05 -NNC14TA36T) performed by Boeing under the NASA Research and Technology for Aerospace Propulsion Systems (RTAPS) contract. In the study conducted under RTAPS, a series of icing tests in the Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) have been conducted to characterize ice formations on large-scale swept wings representative of modern commercial transport airplanes. The outcome of that campaign was a large database of ice-accretion geometries that can be used for subsequent aerodynamic evaluation in other experimental facilities and for validation of ice-accretion prediction codes.Document ID20180002545Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsYadlin, Yoram*(Boeing Aerospace Co. Huntington Beach, CA, United States)*Monnig, Jaime T.*(Boeing Co. Seattle, WA, United States)*Malone, Adam M.*(Boeing Co. Seattle, WA, United States)*Paul, Bernard P.*(Boeing Co. Seattle, WA, United States)*Date AcquiredApril 24, 2018Publication DateMarch 1, 2018Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberDOT/FAA/TC-18/17GRC-E-DAA-TN52477E-19482NASA/CR-2018- 219781Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: SPEC5732CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL16AA04BWBS: WBS 081876.02.03.08.02.01TASK: NNC16TA90TDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsAerodynamicsAircraft icingScale modelsAvailable DownloadsNameType20180002545.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 of Robert Half International Inc. (the Form 10-K), I, M. Keith Waddell, Chief Financial Officer of Robert Half International Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Form 10-K fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Robert Half International Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Robert Half International Inc. and will be retained by Robert Half International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



|                  |  |                                                                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|February 18, 2010 |  | /s/ M. Keith Waddell                                                   
|                  |  | M. Keith Waddell Chief Financial Officer Robert Half International Inc.