alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§121 to 134. Repealed. June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §16, 61 Stat. 172

Sections, act Apr. 26, 1910, ch. 191, 36 Stat. 335, formerly known as "The Insecticides Act", are covered by subchapter II of this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal; Savings Provision

Act June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §16, 61 Stat. 172, repealed this subchapter effective one year after June 25, 1947, and further provided that this subchapter should be deemed to remain in full force for the purpose of sustaining any proper suit, action, or other proceeding with respect to any violations, liabilities incurred, or appeals taken prior to such date of repeal or to sales, shipments, or deliveries of insecticides and fungicides exempted by the Secretary.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 129 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee 

on Intelligence in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Mr. TURNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select 

Committee on Intelligence in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee 

4 on Intelligence (hereafter in this resolution referred to as 

5 the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff sala6 ries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $17,200,000 for the One 

9 Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 129 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $8,200,000 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2023, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,000,000 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2024, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2025. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAutonomous RPRV Navigation, Guidance and ControlDryden Flight Research Center has the responsibility for flight testing of advanced remotely piloted research vehicles (RPRV) to explore highly maneuverable aircraft technology, and to test advanced structural concepts, and related aeronautical technologies which can yield important research results with significant cost benefits. The primary purpose is to provide the preliminary design of an upgraded automatic approach and landing control system and flight director display to improve landing performance and reduce pilot workload. A secondary purpose is to determine the feasibility of an onboard autonomous navigation, orbit, and landing capability for safe vehicle recovery in the event of loss of telemetry uplink communication with the vehicles. The current RPRV approach and landing method, the proposed automatic and manual approach and autoland system, and an autonomous navigation, orbit, and landing system concept which is based on existing operational technology are described.Document ID19890004857Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsJohnston, Donald E.*(Systems Technology, Inc. Hawthorne, CA, United States)*Myers, Thomas T.*(Systems Technology, Inc. Hawthorne, CA, United States)*Zellner, John W.*(Systems Technology, Inc. Hawthorne, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1983Subject CategoryAircraft Communications And NavigationReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-179425TR-1180-1NAS 1.26:179425Accession Number89N14228Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS4-2896Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890004857.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA - 2011 - Directorate Identifier: 2011 - NE - 31 - AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA,**  **etc)?** (You might need to submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “ **Ex Parte Contacts** .”) ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE 

### Timken 480 - 606 - 3010 Cy rus Ghassemi Sept 9, 2011 Concur.

Other/Additional Information:
# EUR-Lex - 61996O0174 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 61996O0174

**Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 December 1996. - Orlando Lopes v Court of Justice of the European Communities. - Inadmissibility - Applicant not represented. - Case C-174/96 P. **

*
European Court reports 1996 Page I-06401 *

Summary

## Keywords

Procedure - Originating application - Procedural requirements - Application not brought through a lawyer - Applicant's standing as a lawyer authorized to plead before a national court - Not relevant - Inadmissibility

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 17, third para., and Art. 19, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 37(1), first subparagraph)

Summary

Whatever his standing, a party within the meaning of the third paragraph of Article 17 of the Statute of the Court of Justice is not authorized to act in person before the Court, but must use the services of a third person authorized to practise before a court of a Member State or of a State which is a party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area.

## Summary

Since no derogation from or exception to that obligation is provided for by the Statute or the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, the submission of an application signed by the applicant himself, even if he is a lawyer authorized to plead before a national court, cannot be sufficient for the purpose of bringing an action.
#### § 516.24 Preservation of evidence.

Because documents needed for litigation or administrative proceedings are subject to routine destruction, the SJA or legal adviser will ensure that all relevant documents are preserved.
#### SIMEON v. HARDIN

No. 386P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 831

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Stevan R. Schott, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 24th day of March, 2005.



/s/ Stevan R. SchottStevan R. Schott Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Effectof finite span on the airload distributions for oscillating wings.

 
v1 |v2 |
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 21/5:6/1194
Item Number:�(online)
System Number: 001105181
August 28, 2019
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6786

RONALD G. BAILEY-EL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden; JAMES SMITH, Security

Chief,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA00-803-DKC)

Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 31, 2003

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald G. Bailey-El, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald G. Bailey-El seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his claims filed under the Civil Rights Act, 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and the Religious Land Use and

Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5

(West Supp. 2003). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

Although the district court administratively closed Bailey-El’s

case when it consolidated his case with those filed by other

inmates, his co-plaintiffs’ actions are still pending. Only once

those claims have been adjudicated may this court assert appellate

jurisdiction. See Robinson v. Parke-Davis & Co., 685 F.2d 912, 913

(4th Cir. 1982) (holding that order not final if it disposes of

“fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer

than all the parties”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §531. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives

#### (a), (b) Transferred

#### (c) Transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets to the Department of Justice

#### (1) Transferred

#### (2) Administration and revenue collection functions

There shall be retained within the Department of the Treasury the authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms relating to the administration and enforcement of chapters 51 and 52 of title 26, sections 4181 and 4182 of title 26, and title 27.

#### (3) Transferred

#### (d) Tax and Trade Bureau

#### (1) Establishment

There is established within the Department of the Treasury the Tax and Trade Bureau.

#### (2) Administrator

The Tax and Trade Bureau shall be headed by an Administrator, who shall perform such duties as assigned by the Under Secretary for Enforcement of the Department of the Treasury. The Administrator shall occupy a career-reserved position within the Senior Executive Service.

#### (3) Responsibilities

The authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms that are not transferred to the Department of Justice under this section shall be retained and administered by the Tax and Trade Bureau.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XI, §1111, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2274; Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1187(b), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3127.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–162 transferred section catchline and subsecs. (a)–(c)(1), (3), to section 599A of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
### SUBCHAPTER III—ADVANCEMENT, ALLOTMENT, AND ASSIGNMENT OF PAY
### §984. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–254, div. J, §1816(f), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3541

Section, Pub. L. 109–347, title II, §235, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1919, related to pilot program to improve the security of empty containers.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James L. Turner,
Group Executive and Chief Commercial Officer of Duke Energy Carolinas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Carolinas.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/    JAMES L. TURNER                      
|James L. Turner                             
|Group Executive and Chief Commercial Officer
|November 13, 2006
### **CHAPTER 102—UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE UNIFORMED DIVISION PERSONNEL**

Sec.
10201.
Definitions.
10202.
Authorities.
10203.
Basic pay.
10204.
Rate of pay for original appointments.
10205.
Service step adjustments.
10206.
Technician positions.
10207.
Promotions.
10208.
Demotions.
10209.
Clothing allowances.
10210.
Reporting requirement.
#### Mary Pound, Administratrix, etc., Respondent, *v.*The Jefferson Iron Company, Appellant.

(Argued February 3, 1882;

decided February 10, 1882.)

*F. W. Hubbard*for appellant.

*D. O'Brien*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Andrews, Oh. J., absent.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                24,988
<SECURITIES>                          9,518
<RECEIVABLES>                         35,070
<ALLOWANCES>                          201
<INVENTORY>                           10,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      83,885
<PP&E>                                64,682
<DEPRECIATION>                        51,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        118,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 38,338
<BONDS>                               38,626
<COMMON>                              8,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           61
<OTHER-SE>                            26,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          118,391
<SALES>                               69,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      69,897
<CGS>                                 50,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         63,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      75
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      42
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    1,675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       6,455
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   5,651
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          5,651
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .74
        

</TABLE>
§ 2001.36 Classified information in the custody of private organizations or individuals. ( a ) *Authorized holders.* Agencies may allow for the holding of classified information by a private organization or individual provided that all access and safeguarding requirements of the Order have been met. Agencies must provide declassification assistance to such organizations or individuals.
( b ) *Others.* Anyone who becomes aware of organizations or individuals who possess potentially classified national security information outside of government control must contact the Director of ISOO for guidance and assistance. The Director of ISOO, in consultation with other agencies, as appropriate, will ensure that the safeguarding and declassification requirements of the Order are met.
§ 536.91 Scope for claims under the Non-Scope Claims Act. ( a ) This subpart applies worldwide and prescribes the substantive bases and special procedural requirements for the administrative settlement and payment of not more than $1,000 for any claim against the United States for personal injury, death or damage to, or loss of, property caused by military personnel or civilian employees, incident to the use of a U.S. vehicle at any location, or incident to the use of other U.S. property on a government installation, which claim is not cognizable under any other provision of law.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart, a “government installation” is a facility having fixed boundaries owned or controlled by the government, and a “vehicle” includes every description of carriage or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as means of transportation on land (1 U.S.C. 4).
( c ) Any claim in which there appears to be a dispute about whether the employee was acting within the scope of employment will be considered under subparts C, D, or F of this part. Only when all parties, including an insurer, agree that there is no “in scope” issue will the claim be considered under this subpart.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Annual Report of Accupoll  Holding Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-K for the year  ended  June 30,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Dennis
Vadura, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

               A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section
906 has been provided to Accupoll Holding Corp. and will be retained by Accupoll
Holding Corp.  and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

September 28, 2004                /s/ Dennis Vadura
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Dennis Vadura
                                  Chief Executive Officer



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23





	CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
	-----------------------------------------


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our reports included in this Form 10-K, into
the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 2-93964, 2-93963, 2-87076, 2-72454, 33-16489, 33-
36457, 33-43645, 33-67132, 33-67134, 33-55755, 333-13029, 333-
43257 and 333-51735) and Form S-3 (Nos. 33-50682 and 333-27415).










Milwaukee, Wisconsin,                      ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
March 28, 2000.
§ 37.305 When may I use a fixed-support TIA? You may use a fixed-support TIA if: ( a ) The agreement is to support or stimulate research with outcomes that are well defined, observable, and verifiable;
( b ) You can reasonably estimate the resources required to achieve those outcomes well enough to ensure the desired level of cost sharing (*see* example in § 37.560(b)); and
( c ) Your TIA does not require a specific amount or percentage of recipient cost sharing. In cases where the agreement does require a specific amount or percentage of cost sharing, a fixed-support TIA is not practicable because the agreement has to specify cost principles or standards for costs that may be charged to the project; require the recipient to track the costs of the project; and provide access for audit to allow verification of the recipient's compliance with the mandatory cost sharing. You therefore must use an expenditure-based TIA if you: ( 1 ) Have a non-waivable requirement (*e.g.,* in statute) for a specific amount or percentage of recipient cost sharing; or
( 2 ) Have otherwise elected to include in the TIA a requirement for a specific amount or percentage of cost sharing.