alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
     TIMBERLINE SOFTWARE  CORPORATION'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN ITS
     ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               Dec-31-1995
<CASH>                                       3,856,533
<SECURITIES>                                 3,439,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,411,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                   225,909
<INVENTORY>                                    326,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,502,796
<PP&E>                                       5,738,256
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,374,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,384,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,609,236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       345,906
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,014,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,384,888
<SALES>                                     13,435,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,819,365
<CGS>                                        2,836,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,731,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,446,743
<INCOME-TAX>                                   714,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,732,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,732,743
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        


</TABLE>
Nuestra Propia 

Estrella: 

el Sol

pgq

En un día claro anda afuera y díle,

"Hola" a nuestra propia estrella - El Sol!

(Pero nunca lo mires directamente, ya que

puedes hacerte daño a los ojos.) 

e imagina que este gran círculo es el Sol.

Entonces el pequeño punto sería el tamaño

de la Tierra. Claro esta, la tierra no está

tan cerca del sol.
26 years
¿Qué edad tendrías al llegar al Sol?

¿Qué edad tendrías al regresar de tu

viaje al Sol? 

¿Qué recibimos del Sol? El Sol nos da

el calor y la luz necesarias para poder

vivir. Sin el Sol, la Tierra sería una bola

de hielo.

vela. Si te fijas bien en una vela puedes

ver puntos brillantes y oscuros en la llama.

Los gases calientes del Sol también tienen

puntos oscuros y brillantes. Los gases se

mueven y fluyen.

g

También hay explosiones gigantescas 

llamadas destellos solares, en los cuales

los gases calientes son arrojados desde el

Sol - como la salsa de espaguetis que hace

burbujas y salpica. Estas grandes 

tormentas lanzan material fuera del Sol

hacia el espacio.

pqp

llama "viento solar." Le toma a este 

viento de uno a cinco días para llegar a la

Tierra. Algunas veces el viento solar

causa en el cielo luces hermosas, llamadas

aurora. Estas luces parecen sábanas de

colores en el cielo.

pp

teléfonos, televisores y radios. Esto

puede ser muy peligroso para la policía, los

bomberos, los aviones y los barcos en el

mar.

pp

más del tiempo de la Tierra y su clima.

NASA nos ayuda a aprender más sobre el

Sol enviando satélites al espacio para

estudiar el tiempo espacial. Tal vez algún

día tú puedas trabajar para la NASA.

pp

alumbra el cielo durante el día y nos da calor

al igual que en la noche las estrellas le dan al

cielo su especial belleza.
Diseño e Ilustración por Daniel Vong

Las familias pueden disfrutar la versión interactiva en la red electrónica de “Nuestra

Propia estrella: el sol” en la página de

Educación del Solar Terrestrial Probes.

http://stp.gsfc.nasa.gov
#### § 339.13 Reports to Congress and GAO.

Upon the issuance of a final guidance document, the appropriate Federal Register Liaison Officer will submit a report to Congress and GAO in accordance with the procedures described in 5 U.S.C. 801 (the “Congressional Review Act”). If the CRA procedures are not followed, the guidance document can be nullified.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1814. ROLAND LINNETTE RAY v. THE STATE.

Following a jury trial, Roland Linnette Ray was convicted of aggravated

assault, reckless conduct, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, possession of

a firearm by a convicted felon during a crime, and three counts of influencing a

witness. He filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied on January 14,

2019. On February 14, 2019, Ray filed a notice of appeal. We lack jurisdiction

because the notice of appeal was untimely.

Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-38 (a), a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days

of entry of the order on appeal. The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is

an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon this Court. Couch v. United

PaperworkersIntl. Union, 224 Ga. App. 721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997). Here, Ray filed

his notice of appeal 31 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal. His appeal is

therefore untimely, and it is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Because Ray is represented by counsel, he is informed of the following in

accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This appeal

has been dismissed because of your counsel’sfailure to file a timely notice of appeal. 

If you still wish to appeal, you may request the trial court to grant an out-of-time

appeal. If the trial court grants an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from that

grant in which to instigate an appeal. If the trial court denies your request for an outof-time appeal, you may appeal that denial by filing a notice of appeal within 30 days

of the denial. If you no longer wish to appeal your conviction, you need not do

anything else.

The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to Ray as well as to

December 09, 2019
Ray’s attorney, who is also directed to send a copy to Ray.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/09/2019
§ 21.320 Are there areas in which DoD Components must establish policies and procedures to implement the DoDGARs? Yes, Heads of DoD Components or their designees must establish policies and procedures in areas where uniform policies and procedures throughout the DoD Component are required, such as for: ( a ) Requesting class deviations from the DoDGARs (*see* §§ 21.335(b) and 21.340(a)) or exemptions from the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 6301 through 6308, that govern the appropriate use of contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements (*see* 32 CFR 22.220).
( b ) Designating one or more Grant Appeal Authorities to resolve claims, disputes, and appeals (*see* 32 CFR 22.815).
( c ) Reporting data on assistance awards and programs, as required by 31 U.S.C. chapter 61 (*see* subpart E of this part).
[68 FR 47153, Aug. 7, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 51240, Aug. 19, 2020]
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 1350 Certification of the**

**Chief Executive Officer**

I, James R. Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporationfor the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.
#### § 277.2 Applicability.

This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD); the Military Departments; the Office of the Inspector General, Department of Defense (OIG, DoD); the Defense Agencies; and the DoD Field Activities (hereafter referred to collectively as “DoD Components”).
Exhibit 15.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111310 and 333-152335) pertaining to the Employees' Stock Option Plans of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd of our report dated January 28, 2013 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Pocared Diagnostics Ltd included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012.




Tel-Aviv, Israel

March 10, 2013
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER

A Member of Ernst & Young Global
#### § 37.1235 Award-specific audit.

An audit of a single TIA, usually done at the cognizant agreements officer's request, to help resolve issues that arise during or after the performance of the research project. An award-specific audit of an individual award differs from a periodic audit of a participant (as defined in § 37.1325).
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This  Amendment to Employment  Agreement (the  "Amendment")  is entered
into by and between Phar-Mor,  Inc., a Pennsylvania  corporation (the "Company")
and Warren E. Jeffery  (the  "Employee")  as of August 27, 1998 (the  "Effective
Date").

         WHEREAS,  Employee is currently  employed by the Company  pursuant to a
written  Employment   Agreement  dated  as  of  June  23,  1998  (the  "Existing
Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS,  the Company  and the  Employee  desire to amend the  Existing
Agreement.

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

1.  Section IV.,  TERMINATION,  sub-paragraph  F.3.,  Other Than for Cause or by
Reason of Death or Disability,  as set forth in the Existing  Agreement shall be
amended to provide,  notwithstanding  anything to the contrary  contained in the
Existing  Agreement,  should a Change of Control occur on or prior to August 27,
1999,  then the Employee shall be entitled to all of those benefits set forth in
sub-paragraph F.3.(b) in addition to any other benefits the Employee is entitled
to thereunder. The date "June 23, 1998" as contained in sub-paragraph F.3.(b) of
the Existing  Agreement shall be deleted and "August 27, 1999" shall be inserted
in its place as it applies  to any  Change of  Control  to provide  that in such
event the Employee  shall receive two times total  compensation  as described in
the Existing Agreement.

2. All other  current  terms and  conditions  of the Existing  Agreement,  shall
remain the same and any  defined  terms used  herein  shall have the  meaning as
defined in the Existing Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the date first above written.

PHAR-MOR, INC.

By:_______________________________            __________________________________
         Abbey J. Butler                               Warren E. Jeffery
         Co-Chairman and Chief
         Executive Officer

By:_______________________________
         Melvyn J. Estrin
         Co-Chairman and Chief
         Executive Officer
§ 196.505 Employment criteria. A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for any employment opportunity that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless: ( a ) Use of such test or other criterion is shown to predict validly successful performance in the position in question; and
( b ) Alternative tests or criteria for such purpose, which do not have such disproportionately adverse effect, are shown to be unavailable.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21.1


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


American Casino Enterprises, Inc.
American Care Group, Inc.
Diversy Enterprises, Inc.
F.A.S.T., Inc.
Fowler Card Club, Inc.
G&L Acquisition Corp.
Las Vegas Ad-Ventures
Nevada Publishing, Inc.
Millerton Games, Inc.
Motel Development, Inc.
Reservation Connection, Inc.
Royal Reservation, Inc.
Trinidad Management, Inc.
Mondel, Inc.
Sitka Restaurant Group, Inc.
Vantage Bay Group, Inc.
Placement 2000.com, Inc.
Opinion filed December 5, 2019



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ _____ 

### No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 049

- CR

____ _ ______ 

### LUIS RIVERA A/K/A LUIS RIVERA CINTRON , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 35 th District Court Brown County, Texas Trial Court Cause No

. CR26135

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant, Luis Rivera a/k/a Luis Rivera Cintron
, waived a jury and entered an open plea of guilty to sexual assault of a child

. Appellant also pleaded true to a felony enhancement allegation, and t he trial court ordered a presentence investigation report. The trial court convicted Appellant, found the habitual

offender enhancement allegation to be true, and assessed Appellant’s pu nishment at confinement for life

. We affirm

.2

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and conclude s that the appeal is without
merit as the re are no arguable issues to raise in this appeal. Counsel has provided
A ppellant with a copy of the brief , the motion to withdraw, an explanatory letter,
and a copy of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record

. Counsel advised A ppellant
of his right to review the record and file a response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his right to file a petition for discretionary review in order to seek review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

. Court

- appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); an d Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Appellant subsequently filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. We have reviewed Appellant’s response. In addressing an Anders brief and a pro se response, a court of appeals may only deter mine (1) that the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and finds no reversible error or (2) that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so that new counsel may be appo inted to brief the issues. Schulman , 252 S.W.3d at 409; Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman , we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree with counsel that no arguable grounds for appeal
exist

. 1

1 We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 68.3

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw
, and we affirm the judgment of the
trial court

.

PER CURIAM

December 5 , 2019 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher , J., and Wright, S.C.J. 2
Willson, J., not participating.

2 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Ea stland, sitting by assignment.
March 22, 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CEDRIC DEWAYNE ROBIN SON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00282

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified below for

observa nce.
§ 552.38 Acquisition of maneuver agreements for Army commanders. ( a ) *Authorization.* After a maneuver is authorized by the Department of the Army, the Army commander will select the specific areas desired for use.
( b ) *Real estate coverage.* Real estate coverage will be in the form of agreements with landowners, granting the right to conduct maneuvers at a given time or periodically. Short-term leases for exclusive use may also be acquired for special areas (such as headquarters areas, radio relay sites, base camp sites, field hospital sites, and supply dumps) and buildings needed for warehouses, ordnance shops and similar purposes directly related to the maneuver. Permits will also be obtained to cover the use of lands under the jurisdiction of another Government department or agency.
( c ) *Responsibility for negotiation and restoration.* The appropriate division or district engineer will be responsible for negotiating maneuver agreements and short-term leases and, after the maneuver is completed, will be responsible for negotiating restoration settlements and/or releases, as appropriate.
#### § 916.1 Scope.

This part contains all rules applicable only within Kansas which have been adopted under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.

[46 FR 5898, Jan. 21, 1981]
### §3106. Employment of attorneys; restrictions

Except as otherwise authorized by law, the head of an Executive department or military department may not employ an attorney or counsel for the conduct of litigation in which the United States, an agency, or employee thereof is a party, or is interested, or for the securing of evidence therefor, but shall refer the matter to the Department of Justice. This section does not apply to the employment and payment of counsel under section 1037 of title 10.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 415.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 49. | R.S. §189.Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–861, §7(a), 72 Stat. 1555. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 314. | R.S. §365.Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–861, §7(b), 72 Stat. 1555. |

Statutes at Large

Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–861, §7(a), 72 Stat. 1555.

Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–861, §7(b), 72 Stat. 1555.

Sections 189 and 365 of the Revised Statutes, as amended, are combined and the section is revised to express the effect of the law since department heads have long employed, with the approval of Congress, attorneys to advise them in the conduct of their official duties. The law which concentrates the authority for the conduct of litigation in the Department of Justice is codified in section 516 of title 28 by this bill.

The words "Executive department" are substituted for "department" as the definition of "department" applicable to R.S. §189 is coextensive with the definition of "Executive department" in section 101. The words "or military department" are inserted to preserve the application of the source law. Before enactment of the National Security Act Amendments of 1949 (63 Stat. 578), the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Department of the Air Force were Executive departments. The National Security Act Amendments of 1949 established the Department of Defense as an Executive Department including the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Department of the Air Force as military departments, not as Executive departments. However, the source law for this section, which was in effect in 1949, remained applicable to the Secretaries of the military departments by virtue of section 12(g) of the National Security Act Amendments of 1949 (63 Stat. 591), which is set out in the reviser's note for section 301.

R.S. §189 was part of title IV of the Revised Statutes. The Act of July 26, 1947, ch. 343, §201(d), as added Aug. 1, 1949, ch. 412, §4, 63 Stat. 579 (former 5 U.S.C. 171–1), which provides "Except to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this Act [National Security Act of 1947], the provisions of title IV of the Revised Statutes as now or hereafter amended shall be applicable to the Department of Defense" is omitted from this title but is not repealed.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
§ 536.79 Action on appeal under the Military Claims Act. ( a ) The appeal will be examined by the settlement authority who last acted on the claim, or his or her successor, to determine if the appeal complies with the requirements of this regulation. The settlement authority will also examine the claim file and decide whether additional investigation is required; ensure that all allegations or evidence presented by the claimant, agent, or attorney are documented; and ensure that all pertinent evidence is included. If claimants state that they appeal, but do not submit supporting materials within the 60-day appeal period or an approved extension thereof, these appeals will be determined on the record as it existed at the time of denial or final offer. Unless action under paragraph (b) of this section is taken, the claim and complete investigative file, including any additional investigation, and a tort claims memorandum will be forwarded to the appropriate appellate authority for necessary action on the appeal.
( b ) If the evidence in the file, including information submitted by the claimant with the appeal and that found by any necessary additional investigation, indicates that the appeal should be granted in whole or in part, the settlement authority who last acted on the claim, or his or her successor, will attempt to settle the claim. If a settlement cannot be reached, the appeal will be forwarded in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) As to an appeal that requires action by TJAG, TAJAG, or the Secretary of the Army or designee, the Commander USARCS may take the action in paragraph (b) of this section or forward the claim together with a recommendation for action. All matters submitted by the claimant will be forwarded and considered.
( d ) Since an appeal under this subpart is not an adversarial proceeding, no form of hearing is authorized. A request by the claimant for access to documentary evidence in the claim file to be used in considering the appeal will be granted unless law or regulation does not permit access.
( e ) If the appellate authority upholds a final offer or authorizes an award on appeal from a denial of a claim, the notice of the appellate authority's action will inform the claimant that he or she must accept the award within 180 days of the date of mailing of the notice of the appellate authority's action or the award will be withdrawn, the claim will be deemed denied, and the file will be closed without future recourse.