alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
File No. 33-14604

File No. 811-04963

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM N-1A

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 [X]  

Pre-Effective Amendment No. [ ]
Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 [X]

and/or

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940[X]  

Amendment No. 23   

(Check appropriate box or boxes.)

THE BERWYN FUNDS

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

1189 Lancaster Avenue, Berwyn, PA 19312

(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

Registrant s Telephone Number, including Area Code (610)296-7222

Kevin M. Ryan, Secretary and Treasurer

The Berwyn Funds

1189 Lancaster Avenue, Berwyn, PA 19312

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

Please send copies of all communications to:

Kevin M. Ryan

Approximate date of proposed public offering: May 1, 2003 
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriatebox):

..... immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b).

..X..on May 1, 2003 pursuant to paragraph (b)

.. .. 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)

..... on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)

..... 75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)

..... on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485.

If appropriate, check the following box:

..... This post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a

previously filed post-effective amendment
** 

 

 

 

 

 

THE BERWYN FUNDS

BERWYN FUND SERIES

BERWYN INCOME FUND SERIES

BERWYN CORNERSTONE FUND SERIES

 

 

 

 

PROSPECTUS

May 1, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
*The Securities and Exchange Commission has not approved ordisapproved these securities or passed upon the adequacy of this prospectus. Anyrepresentation to the contrary is a criminal offense.*
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
***TABLE OF CONTENTS*
 ****Page****Berwyn Fund Series
  **Risk/Return Summary
  1 **Performance
  2 **Fees and Expenses
  3 **Investment Objective, Principal Strategies and************
** 
Exhibit 31.2

 
Certification

 

I, Donald A. French, certify that:
1.
I    have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of UQM Technologies, Inc.:2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue    statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial    information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the    financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and    for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange    Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that    material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,    is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in    which this annual report is being prepared;b.
Evaluated    the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and    presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based    on such evaluation; andc.
Disclosed    in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial    reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the    registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has    materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s    internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,    based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the    registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to    adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report    financial information; andb.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other    employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over    financial reporting.
Date:  May    25, 2004
/s/ Donald    A. French
Donald A. French
Treasurer, Secretary and
Chief Financial Officer
 **
#### STATE v. MCDONALD

No. 606P97

Case below: 128 N.C.App. 188

Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay denied 30 December 1997. Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas denied 5 February 1998. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
o?--?-<;\

DocketNo.FAA-2010~

Record of Ex Parte Contacts

I

Directorate Idct;ltifier: 2009-NM-252-AD

,

With whom outside the FAA has this action beeD discusSed (i.c., Design Approval Holder,

,

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAM:A, ete)? (You might need 10 submit a separate

I !lii! record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual dEfines "Ex Pmte O,Olllucts. '') \;:,_7

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED I DATE RESPONSE

ATA JOE WHITE 09/08/20] 0 Concur.

Boeing LonO" Beach JlMFINN 09/08/2010 I Concur.

I

I

I

,

I

I

,

I

Other! Additionallnfomlation:
§ 750.47 Measure of damages for property claims. Determine the measure of damages in property claims arising in the United States or its territories, commonwealth, or possessions under the law of the place where the incident occurred. Determine the measure of damages in property claims arising overseas under general principles of American tort law, stated as follows: ( a ) If the property has been or can be economically repaired, the measure of damages shall be the actual or estimated net cost of the repairs necessary to substantially restore the property to the condition that existed immediately prior to the incident. Damages shall not exceed the value of the property immediately prior to the incident less the value thereof immediately after the incident. To determine the actual or estimated net cost of repairs, the value of any salvaged parts or materials and the amount of any net appreciation in value effected through the repair shall be deducted from the actual or estimated gross cost of repairs. The amount of any net depreciation in the value of the property shall be added to such gross cost of repairs, if such adjustments are sufficiently substantial in amount to warrant consideration. Estimates of the cost of repairs shall be based upon the lower or lowest of two or more competitive bids, or upon statements or estimates by one or more competent and disinterested persons, preferably reputable dealers or officials familiar with the type of property damaged, lost, or destroyed.
( b ) If the property cannot be economically repaired, the measure of damages shall be the value of the property immediately prior to the incident less the value immediately after the incident. Estimates of value shall be made, if possible, by one or more competent and disinterested persons, preferably reputable dealers or officials familiar with the type of property damaged, lost, or destroyed.
( c ) Loss of use of damaged property which is economically repairable may, if claimed, be included as an additional element of damage to the extent of the reasonable expense actually incurred for appropriate substitute property, for such period reasonably necessary for repairs, as long as idle property of the claimant was not employed as a substitute. When substitute property is not obtainable, other competent evidence such as rental value, if not speculative or remote, may be considered. When substitute property is reasonably available but not obtained and used by the claimant, loss of use is normally not payable.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 150

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and t hen out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### AFM TR In corporation 1.0 $ 85.00 $ 

### 0 $ 85.00 

### 959 $ 81,515.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of produ cts in compliance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 81,515 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

**On**

**- Cond**  **ition Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explai n warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:**
Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requiremen ts for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 28, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Parcel Select Contract 46 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-63, CP2021-65.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2020-29315 Filed 1-6-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
exv10w13



 







Exhibit 10.13




SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM




     Each member of the Company’s board of directors who is not an employee will receive the
following cash compensation for board services, as applicable:




	 	•	 	$17,500 per year for service as a board member;
	 
	 	•	 	$7,500 per year for service as chairman of the audit committee;
	 
	 	•	 	$2,500 per year for service as chairman of the compensation
committee or the
nominating and corporate governance committee;
	 
	 	•	 	$1,500 for each board meeting attended in person ($750 for meetings attended by
video or telephone conference);
	 
	 	•	 	$1,500 for each audit or compensation committee meeting attended by the chairman of
such committee in person ($750 for meetings attended by video or telephone conference); and
	 
	 	•	 	$1,000 for each committee meeting attended in person by members who are not chairman
of such committee ($500 for meetings attended by video or telephone conference).





     The foregoing annual payments will be made on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of
stockholders beginning in calendar 2007 and for years thereafter, and per-meeting payments will be
made for meetings occurring on or after the date of the closing of the Company’s initial public
offering.



     Each member of the Company’s board of directors who is not an employee will receive the
following equity compensation for board services, as applicable:




	 	•	 	Upon election to the board of directors, a stock option grant to purchase               
 shares of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan; and
	 
	 	•	 	On the date of each annual meeting of our stockholders beginning in 2007,
a stock option grant to purchase
              
shares of common stock pursuant to the
Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, for each non-employee director who has
served as a non-employee director for at least six months prior to that annual
meeting.
---



Exhibit 32
      CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December  31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mark D. Morelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Harry W. Zike, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that based on his knowledge:  1.
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Mark D. Morelli
 Mark D. Morelli
 Chief Executive Officer February 9, 2009   /s/ Harry W. Zike
 Harry W. Zike
 Chief Financial Officer February 9, 2009
§ 2002.30 Education and training. ( a ) The CUI SAO must establish and implement an agency training policy. At a minimum, the training policy must address the means, methods, and frequency of agency CUI training.
( b ) Agency training policy must ensure that personnel who have access to CUI receive training on designating CUI, relevant CUI categories and subcategories, the CUI Registry, associated markings, and applicable safeguarding, disseminating, and decontrolling policies and procedures.
( c ) Agencies must train employees on these matters when the employees first begin working for the agency and at least once every two years thereafter.
( d ) The CUI EA reviews agency training materials to ensure consistency and compliance with the Order, this part, and the CUI Registry.
§ 1901.52 Criminal penalties. ( a ) *Unauthorized disclosure.* Criminal penalties may be imposed against any officer or employee of the CIA who, by virtue of employment, has possession of or access to Agency records which contain information identifiable with an individual, the disclosure of which is prohibited by the Privacy Act or by these rules, and who, knowing that disclosure of the specific material is so prohibited, willfully discloses the material in any manner to any person or agency not entitled to receive same.
( b ) *Unauthorized maintenance.* Criminal penalties may be imposed against any officer or employee of the CIA who willfully maintains a system of records without meeting the requirements of section (e)(4) of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.552a. The Coordinator and the Inspector General are authorized independently to conduct such surveys and inspect such records as necessary from time to time to ensure that these requirements are met.
( c ) *Unauthorized requests.* Criminal penalties may be imposed upon any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning an individual from the CIA under false pretenses.
#### In the Matter of Jonathan H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 329]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Turbow, J.), dated November 3, 2005, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated August 26, 2005, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of assault in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated August 26, 2005.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as placed the appellant in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as the period of placement has expired; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

*857Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see Matter of David H.,*69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]; *cf. People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the appellant’s identity as the perpetrator beyond a reasonable doubt *(see*Family Ct Act § 342.2 [2]). “An identification is not precluded merely because the witness did not see the facial features of the perpetrator” *(Matter of Ryan W.,*143 AD2d 435, 436 [1988]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we cannot say that the court’s determination was against the weight of the evidence *(see Matter of James B.,*262 AD2d 480, 481 [1999]; *cf.*CPL 470.15 [5]). Crane, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Map 2-21: Alternative C

Areas Withdrawn from Mineral Entry

Related to Greater Sage Grouse Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

Withdrawn from Mineral Entry

Recommended for Withdrawal from

Mineral Entry

Federal Locatable Mineral Estate

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: Identified restrictions displayed on this map

are in addition to existing restrictions already

approved through previous planning efforts.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report of Quixote Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission as of the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the officersof the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to suchofficer’s knowledge:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
| Date: February 8, 2006  | /s/ LESLIE J. JEZUIT                      |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                         | Leslie J. Jezuit, Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: February 8,  2006 | /s/ DANIEL P. GOREY                       |
|                         | Daniel P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer  |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure.

----