alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 516.56 Witnesses before foreign tribunals. ( a ) *Referral to the SJA.* Requests or subpoenas from a foreign government or tribunal for present DA personnel stationed or employed within that country to be interviewed or to appear as witnesses will be forwarded to the SJA of the command exercising general court-martial jurisdiction over the unit to which the individual is assigned, attached, or employed. The SJA will determine the following: ( 1 ) Whether a consideration listed in § 516.47(a)(1) through (a)(3) applies.
( 2 ) Whether the information requested is releasable under the principles established in § 516.43 through § 516.46.
( 3 ) Whether the approval of the American Embassy should be obtained because the person is attached to the Embassy staff or a question of diplomatic immunity may be involved.
( b ) *United States has an interest in the litigation.* If the SJA determines that the United States has an interest in the litigation, the commander may authorize the interview or order the individual's attendance in a temporary duty status. The United States will be deemed to have an interest in the litigation if it is bound by treaty or other international agreement to ensure the attendance of such personnel.
( c ) *United States has no interest in the litigation.* If the SJA determines that the United States does not have an interest in the litigation, the commander may authorize the interview or the appearance of the witness under the principles established in § 516.47 through § 516.50.
( d ) *Witnesses located outside the requester's country.* If the requested witness is stationed in a country other than the requester's, the matter will be referred to Litigation Division.
§ 28.400 Penalties. ( a ) Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited herein shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such expenditure.
( b ) Any person who fails to file or amend the disclosure form (see Appendix B) to be filed or amended if required herein, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
( c ) A filing or amended filing on or after the date on which an administrative action for the imposition of a civil penalty is commenced does not prevent the imposition of such civil penalty for a failure occurring before that date. An administrative action is commenced with respect to a failure when an investigating official determines in writing to commence an investigation of an allegation of such failure.
( d ) In determining whether to impose a civil penalty, and the amount of any such penalty, by reason of a violation by any person, the agency shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation, the effect on the ability of such person to continue in business, any prior violations by such person, the degree of culpability of such person, the ability of the person to pay the penalty, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
( e ) First offenders under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $10,000, absent aggravating circumstances. Second and subsequent offenses by persons shall be subject to an appropriate civil penalty between $10,000 and $100,000, as determined by the agency head or his or her designee.
( f ) An imposition of a civil penalty under this section does not prevent the United States from seeking any other remedy that may apply to the same conduct that is the basis for the imposition of such civil penalty.
#### § 552.116 Privately owned weapons—security.

Privately owned arms and ammunition will be secured in the manner required for military weapons and ammunition but separate from military arms, ammunition, and explosives (AA&E) items.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1382 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1382

 Expressing the need of all Americans, even when they care most deeply 
   or disagree most strongly, to settle their political differences 
         without resorting to threats or violence of any kind.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2024

    Mr. Krishnamoorthi (for himself and Mr. Wenstrup) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the need of all Americans, even when they care most deeply 
   or disagree most strongly, to settle their political differences 
         without resorting to threats or violence of any kind.

Whereas, over the past decade, there has been a steady increase in political 
        violence across the United States;
Whereas, on January 8, 2011, a domestic terrorist opened fire on then--
        Representative Gabby Giffords and killed 6 people and injured 12 others;
Whereas, on June 14, 2017, a domestic terrorist opened fire on Republican 
        members of Congress at a baseball practice, gravely wounding 
        Representative Steve Scalise and staff who were present;
Whereas threats made against election officials, judges, and lawmakers have 
        increased nearly tenfold since 2016 according to United States Capitol 
        Police;
Whereas political violence poses an existential threat to democracy and American 
        ideals;
Whereas the assassination attempt against former President Donald J. Trump must 
        be categorically condemned by everyone who believes in democracy;
Whereas President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., said, ``There is no place in America for 
        this kind of violence. We must unite as a nation to condemn it'';
Whereas former President Donald J. Trump said, ``In this moment, it is more 
        important than ever that we stand United, and show our True Character as 
        Americans, remaining Strong and Determined, and not allowing Evil to 
        Win''; and
Whereas the threat of potential spiraling violence after former President 
        Trump's assassination attempt are a threat to United States ideals: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives to 
recognizes the critical need for political leaders of both parties and 
at all levels of government, to condemn political violence consistently 
and often.
                                 <all>
```
### Field relations, crystallization, and petrology of reversely zoned granitic plutons in the Bottle Lake Complex, Maine

By: R. A. Ayuso**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1320

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 564.55 Claims not payable. ( a ) *Contributory negligence.* Negligence or wrongful act of the claimant or of his agent or employee, a proximate cause of the accident or incident, bars a claim. The law of the place where the accident or incident occurred will be followed in determining whether contributory negligence is present but the doctrine of comparative negligence will not be applied.
( b ) *Personal injury.* Claims for personal injury are not cognizable under the act of §§ 564.51 to 564.58.
( c ) *Use and occupancy.* Claims for use and occupancy, payment of which is governed by the terms of a lease or contract, are not cognizable under §§ 564.51 to 564.58.
1

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-3735

___________

Cheryl Brewer Southworth, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Missouri Department of Corrections, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant, *

*

Correctional Medical Services, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 6, 2007

Filed: December 27, 2007

___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Cheryl Brewer Southworth appeals the district court’s1

 adverse

grant of summary judgment to Correctional Medical Services (CMS) in her 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action. We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, viewing the

evidence in a light most favorable to Southworth. See Alberson v. Norris, 458 F.3d
-2-

762, 765 (8th Cir. 2006). To prevail in an Eighth Amendment lawsuit, an inmate must

show that her known serious medical needs were deliberately disregarded. See id. To

defeat CMS’s summary judgment motion, Southworth had to create trialworthy issues

as to whether there was a CMS policy, custom, or action by those who represent

official CMS policy, that inflicted an Eighth Amendment injury. See Sanders v.

Sears, Roebuck & Co., 984 F.2d 972, 975-76 (8th Cir. 1993) (corporate liability under

§ 1983). 

While Southworth offered documents showing that her physical and mental

condition significantly deteriorated during the period at issue, she did not establish a

jury question as to whether there was a CMS policy or custom of denying appropriate

tests and treatment to inmates who exhibit the signs and symptoms she reported or

experienced, or as to whether financial concerns dictated diagnostic and treatment

decisions. See Moody v. St. Charles County, 23 F.3d 1410, 1412 (8th Cir. 1994)

(party seeking to defeat summary judgment must substantiate allegations with

sufficient probative evidence to permit finding in his favor based on more than

speculation or conjecture). Southworth could not defeat summary judgment with

articles about CMS and prison medical care in general, or by offering the views of

laypersons that CMS provided Southworth with inadequate care, and that CMS

providers are known to base their treatment decisions on cost. See Brooks v. TriSystems, Inc., 425 F.3d 1109, 1111 (8th Cir. 2005) (hearsay cannot be used to defeat

summary judgment motion); Perry v. Kemna, 356 F.3d 880, 889 (8th Cir. 2004)

(noting that newspaper articles were hearsay and also unrelated to proceedings);

Erickson v. Farmland Indus., Inc., 271 F.3d 718, 728 (8th Cir. 2001) (affidavits

opposing summary judgment shall be made on personal knowledge, and show

affirmatively that affiant is competent to testify to matters stated therein).

Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny the pending motions. 

______________________________
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R OB ER T ANTHONY GARC IA, Sr., Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. DANIEL REB ER , Gle n da l e Polic e Offic e r B a d ge #15008; e t

a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-16890 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-01717-JATM HB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Jam e s A. Te ilborg, District Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 23, 2014 * * B e fore : W . FLETC HER , R AW LINSON, a

n d C HRISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Ariz ona sta te prisone r R o be rt Anthony Ga rc i a , Sr., a

ppe a l s pro se from

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging va rious c onstitutiona

l viola t ions. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e 

# FIL ED OCT 10 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re vie w de novo a dismissa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915A. Re snic k v . Hay e s , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th C ir. 2000). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d Ga

rc i a ’ s a c tion be c a

use Ga rc i a fa ile d to a l le ge fa c ts suffic ie nt to support one or m ore e le m e nts of his c la im s . Se eHe bbe v . Plile r , 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th C ir. 2010) (a lthough pro se ple a dings a

re libe ra l ly c onstrue d, pla intiff m

ust a lle g e suffic ie nt fa c ts to sta te a pla usiblec la im); C holla Re ady

Mix , Inc . v . C iv ish , 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th C ir. 2004) (c onc lusory a lle gations, unwa

rrante d de duc tions, or unre a sona ble infe re nc e s ne e d not be a c c e pte d a s true ); se ealso Samson v. C alifornia , 547 U.S. 843, 848 (2006) (c la im for unre a sona

ble se arc h); Graham v . C onnor , 490 U.S. 386, 395 (1989) (exc e ssive forc e ); Marsh v . C

ounty of San Die

go , 680 F.3d 1148, 1154-55 (9th C ir. 2012) (due proc e ss); Rhode

s v . Robinson , 408 F.3d 559, 567-68, n.11 (9th Cir. 2005) (re ta lia tion in the

prison c onte xt); Gritc he n v . C ollie r , 254 F.3d 807, 812 (9th C ir. 2001) (viola

tion of 42 U.S.C . § 1983). Garc ia ’ s m o tion to supple m e nt there c ord on a

ppe a l is gra

nte d. Howe ve r, we do not c onside r argum e nts a nd a lle gations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se ePadge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 6 8 9 0 2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11191 Conference Calendar

WILLIAM T. HENDERSON, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TDCJ; BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES; Individually and in Their Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CV-2209-X

- - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * William T. Henderson, Jr., Texas inmate # 280766, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) is GRANTED. The PLRA requires a prisoner appealing IFP in a civil action to pay the full amount of the filing fee, $105.No. 96-11191 - 2 - As Henderson lacks sufficient funds to pay the full filing fee, he is assessed a partial filing fee of $12.18. See § 1915(b)(1)(A). The agency having custody of Henderson is directed to forward payment of the partial filing fee from his prisoner account to the clerk of the district court. Additionally, Henderson is required to make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his account until the full filing fee is paid. See § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Henderson is directed to forward the appropriate payments from his account to the clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10 until the full filing fee of $105 is paid. The district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed Henderson’s complaint as frivolous and malicious. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Bailey v. Johnson , 846 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1988). The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Henderson is hereby WARNED that any future frivolous or malicious filings will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, he should review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous or malicious.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA (the
"Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Craig T Dunham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Paul
J. Weaver, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
        the Company.

                                    /s/ Craig T Dunham
                                   -------------------
                                   Craig T Dunham
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer

                                   /s/ Paul J. Weaver
                                   -------------------
                                   Paul J. Weaver
                                   Chief Financial Officer and Chief
                                   Accounting Officer
August 12, 2009
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Kenneth A, Joyce, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rurban Financial Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.       Dated:March 22, 2007 By: /s/ Kenneth A. Joyce     Kenneth A. Joyce    President and Chief Executive Officer
### §1444e. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title I, §105A, formerly §105C, as added Dec. 23, 1985, Pub. L. 99–198, title IV, §401, 99 Stat. 1395; amended Feb. 28, 1986, Pub. L. 99–253, §2, 100 Stat. 36; Mar. 20, 1986, Pub. L. 99–260, §§2(b), 7(b), 100 Stat. 46, 50; May 27, 1987, Pub. L. 100–45, §3, 101 Stat. 319; Dec. 22, 1987, Pub. L. 100–203, title I, §§1101(b), 1102(b), 1103, 1107, 1113(b), 1202, 101 Stat. 1330–1 to 1330–3, 1330–5, 1330–9, 1330–11; Dec. 12, 1989, Pub. L. 101–220, §1, 103 Stat. 1876; Dec. 19, 1989, Pub. L. 101–239, title I, §§1002(b), 1003(b)(2), 103 Stat. 2107, 2108; renumbered §105A, Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, title IV, §401(2), 104 Stat. 3400, related to loan rates, target prices, disaster payments, acreage limitation and set-aside programs, and land diversion. See Effective and Termination Dates note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective and Termination Dates

Pub. L. 99–198, title IV, §401, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1395, provided that this section is effective only for the 1986 through 1990 crops of feed grains.
§ 552.160 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart establishes procedures for entry to maneuver training areas at Fort Lewis, Yakima Training Center (YTC), and Camp Bonneville. Procedures for other sub-installations to Fort Lewis will be developed by the Commanders of those installations.
( b ) Uninterrupted military use of training areas is vital to the maintenance of US and Allied Armed Forces combat readiness. In addition, maneuver training areas may be dangerous to persons entering without warnings provided during training scheduling or use permit processing.
### §1622a. Authority to assist farmers and elevator operators

The Secretary may provide technical assistance (including information on such financial assistance as may be available) to grain producers and elevator operators to assist such producers and operators in installing or improving grain cleaning, drying or storage equipment.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XX, §2014, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3933.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Grain Quality Incentives Act of 1990, and also as part of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, and not as part of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 which comprises this chapter.