alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 168a.4 Policy and procedures. ( a ) Sponsoring Agencies, in awarding NDSEG fellowships, shall award: ( 1 ) Solely to U.S. citizens and nationals who agree to pursue graduate degrees in science, engineering, or other fields of study that are designated, in accordance with § 168a.5(b)(2), to be of priority interest to the Department of Defense.
( 2 ) Through a nationwide competition in which all appropriate actions have been taken to encourage applications from members of groups (including minorities, women, and disabled persons) that historically have been underrepresented in science and engineering.
( 3 ) Without regard to the geographic region in which the applicant lives or the geographic region in which the applicant intends to pursue an advanced degree.
( b ) The criteria for award of NDSEG fellowships shall be: ( 1 ) The applicant's academic ability relative to other persons applying in the applicant's proposed field of study.
( 2 ) The priority of the applicant's proposed field of study to the Department of Defense.
March 28, 2005

Mr. Francis M. Ciancarelli
2451 Magnolia Road
Vineland, NJ 08361-6679 USA

Dear Fran:

I  am  pleased to offer you the position of Vice  President-
Sales and Marketing for Dynasil Corporation.   This position
will have direct responsibility for Dynasil Sales/ Marketing
as well as dotted line responsibility for Optometrics Sales/
Marketing.

The  following  outlines  the details  of  compensation  and
benefits:

  1)    Base  salary of $80,000 per year which will be  paid
     weekly.

  2)   Annual incentive bonus with a target payout of 10% of
     base salary and a maximum payout of 15% of base salary.  The
     payout goals would be mutually agreeable goals including
     sales, profitability, and potentially other key business
     goals.  Goals would be set for each fiscal year prior to the
     start of the year with an annual payout within the quarter
     following the end of the fiscal year.  For the 2005 fiscal
     year ending September 30, 2005, a payout of at least 10%
     would be guaranteed.

3)   Standard Dynasil benefit package which includes medical
insurance after a 90 day waiting period, short term
disability, the purchase of Dynasil shares at 85% of market
price, a small amount of life insurance, and other benefits.
4)   Stock options to purchase 185,000 shares at the market
price when this agreement is completed.  The Board of
Directors will evaluate the award of additional options on
an annual basis.
5)   Three weeks of vacation which will be prorated for the
first year plus standard Dynasil holidays.
  6)   A weekly car allowance of $112.50 per week as well as a
     company supplied cell phone and computer.

7)   Participate in Quarterly Board of Directors meetings to
provide a sales and marketing update.
A  requirement for employment is signing an insider  trading
and  confidentiality agreement.    Employee  further  agrees
that  for  a  period of two (2) years subsequent to  Dynasil
employment,  he  shall not directly or indirectly  cause  or
attempt  to  cause any existing customer of the  Company  to
divert, terminate, limit, modify adversely or not enter into
any business relationship with the Company.

If  you  are in agreement with the terms as outlined  above,
please sign where indicated and return the original.   I  am
looking forward to you joining Dynasil on a permanent basis.

Sincerely,





Craig T. Dunham         Agreed to:_/s/ F.M. Ciancarelli    Date:3/31/05
President and CEO       Francis M. Ciancarelli
### §745. National planning scenarios

#### (a) In general

The Administrator, in coordination with the heads of appropriate Federal agencies and the National Advisory Council, may develop planning scenarios to reflect the relative risk requirements presented by all hazards, including natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters, in order to provide the foundation for the flexible and adaptive development of target capabilities and the identification of target capability levels to meet the national preparedness goal.

#### (b) Development

In developing, revising, and replacing national planning scenarios, the Administrator shall ensure that the scenarios—

(1) reflect the relative risk of all hazards and illustrate the potential scope, magnitude, and complexity of a broad range of representative hazards; and

(2) provide the minimum number of representative scenarios necessary to identify and define the tasks and target capabilities required to respond to all hazards.

(Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §645, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1425.)
§ 1903.20 Penalties and effects on other laws. ( a ) Whoever shall be found guilty of violating any rule or regulation enumerated in this part is subject to the penalties permitted by 50 U.S.C. 3515(b).
( b ) Nothing in this part shall be construed to abrogate or supersede any other Federal law or any non-conflicting State or local law, ordinance or regulation applicable to any location where the Agency installation is situated.
[63 FR 44786, Aug. 21, 1998, as amended at 88 FR 20763, Apr. 7, 2023]
### §1386. Exemption from laws prohibiting interest of Members of Congress in contracts

The provisions of section 6306 of title 41 and sections 431 and 432 of title 18 shall not be applicable to loans or payments made under this chapter (except under section 1383(a) of this title).

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §386, 52 Stat. 68.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In text, "section 6306 of title 41" substituted for "section 3741 of the Revised Statutes (U.S.C., 1934 edition, title 41, sec. 22)" on authority of Pub. L. 111–350, §6(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3854, which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.

"Sections 431 and 432 of title 18" substituted in text for "sections 114 and 115 of the Criminal Code of the United States (U.S.C., 1934 edition, title 18, secs. 204 and 205)" on authority of act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 683, the first section of which enacted Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wool Support Program

Wool support program, application of this section to, see note set out under section 713a–8 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
[No. 9315.

Department Two.

August 25, 1911.]

#### Little Bill or Maquiqui, *Appellant,*v. Jessie A. Dyslin *et al., Respondents.**1*

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered May 21, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action of ejectment

Affirmed.

-27. *D. Wilcox*and *Wesley Lloyd,*for appellant.

*Boyle, WarJyurton & Brockway*and *J. J. Anderson,*for respondents.

1

Reported in 117 Pac. 487.

Pee Cubiam.

This action was commenced by Little Bill or Maquiqui, against Jessie A. Dyslin and others, to recover possession of' certain Puyallup Indian land in Pierce county. Prom a judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff has appealed.

The issues here raised involve the same questions presented on appeal in the cause of *Little Bill v. Swanson, ante*p. 650, 117 Pac. 481. Upon the authority of the opinion in that cause, filed on this date, the judgment herein is affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00272-CV

Erika Saenz Salmeron, Appellant

v.

Tiofilia Linda Constancio Govea, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-15-002970, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Erika Saenz Salmeron appeals from a judgment awarding possession in a forcible

detainer suit. Her opening brief was originally due on August 20, 2015. After Salmeron failed to

timely file her brief, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to her—on September 21, 2015—advising

that her brief was overdue and that if she did not file a brief or otherwise respond with a reasonable

explanation by October 1, 2015, her appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.1

The October 1 deadline has passed, and to date Salmeron has not filed a brief or otherwise

responded. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.2

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) (if appellant fails to timely file a brief, this Court is 1

empowered to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant reasonably explains the

failure and appellee is not significantly injured by that failure).

 See id. R. 42.3(b). 2
__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: October 15, 2015

2
### SUBCHAPTER III—REPRESENTATION ALLOWANCES, REGULATIONS, GENERAL PROVISIONS, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Edward A. Tomechko, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp., (the "Company"), do
hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the year
ended May 3, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 15, 2003     By:  /s/  Edward A. Tomechko
                                 -----------------------

                            Name:     Edward A. Tomechko
                            Title:   Executive Vice President - Chief Financial
                                     Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Educational Development Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2008,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  |   October 15, 2008 |                                          | By     | /s/ Randall W. White   |
|--------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|   |                         | Randall W. White                              |
|   |                         | President and  Chief Executive Officer        |
|   |                         |                                          |   |
|   |                         |                                          |   |
| Date:  |   October 15, 2008 |                                          | By     | /s/ Marilyn R. Welborn |
|   |                         | Controller and Corporate Secretary            |
|   |                         | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VICTORIA OLEFIR,

Appellant,

v.

KONSTANTIN OLEFIR,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1071

[July 28, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Dale C. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE-21-015656.

Bruce Prober of The Law Offices of Bruce Prober, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellant.

Nancy A. Hass of Nancy A. Hass, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Millici, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on appellant’s typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. Appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the September Term, beginning September 6, 1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Henry V. Scardapane, Esq., 66 Court Street, Brooklyn 1, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 552.95 Compatible use. ( a ) Unit commanders may, during training area scheduling, request that no permit holders be allowed in their areas. Justification must be in the remarks column of HFL Form 473 (Range, Facility and Training Area Request). If this restriction is granted, the Ft. Lewis Area Access Section will close the appropriate areas. In the absence of a trainer's request for closure, the following military activities are considered incompatible with non-training access and will, when scheduled, block affected areas: ( 1 ) Live-fire training events with surface danger zones falling into training areas.
( 2 ) Parachute and air assault operations.
( 3 ) Field artillery firing. The numbered training area occupied by the weapons will be closed.
( 4 ) Motorized infantry operations that will use the majority of the road net in a training area, traveling at higher than normal speeds.
( 5 ) Training employing riot agents or smoke generating equipment.
( b ) The Range Officer may close training areas based on multiple occupation by large units.
( c ) Areas allocated to modern firearm deer hunting are closed to training and recreational activities. When State Fish and Game pheasant release sites can be isolated by swamps, streams, or roads from the rest of a training area, multiple occupancy is authorized.
• Capabilities 

Overview 

Current test methods and 

approaches for poorly water 

soluble substances 

Lee E. Sayers

Senior Research Biologist
• Inhomogeneous solutions

– Flow through conditions

• Variable analytical recoveries

• Undissolved material

– Potential physical toxicity

– Disruption of toxicant delivery

2

Effects of Poorly Soluble Materials
• Settling time (Water Accomodated Fraction)

• Filtration

– Membrane filters (active filtration)

– Filter floss (passive filtration)

• Centrifugation

3

Removal of Undissolved Material
So, you need to test a poorly soluble material 

and you know the pitfalls. What are your 

options??

4

• Advantages

– Eliminates potential solvent 

effect

– Lower microbial growth

• Disadvantages

– Volume limitations

– Instability in water

• Poorly Soluble Materials

– Potentially non-homogenous 

stocks

– Can be a challenge to 

actively filter

– Passive filtration may not be 

effective

Direct Addition-Water Stock
Increased Mixing Time

• Advantages of water 

stocks apply

• Disadvantages

– Material must be 

stable in water

– Limitations during flow 

through exposures

– Need for mixing time 

evaluation – analytical 

support

7
Use of Co-Solvents

Examples of acceptable 

co-solvents

• Acetone

• Dimethyl formamide

(DMF)

• Triethylene glycol (TEG)

• Methanol

8
Solvent Considerations

Advantages

• Aid in achieving 

solubility

• Consistency of test 

concentrations over 

time

• Efficient delivery of test 

substance if delivery is 

not impeded by 

undissolved material

Disadvantages

• Microbial growth 

– Increased labor to 

maintain systems

• Water quality

– Dissolved oxygen 

levels

9
Special Considerations with Solvent 

10

• Concerns of interaction of co-solvent 

with the test item 

• Potential issues in interpretation of 

toxicity data

• Possible rejection of studies 

• Increased cost of compound 

registration

• Animal welfare – vertebrate usage

• Decreased capacity in CROs
Sonication

• Advantages

– Powerful method for 

solid materials

• Disadvantages

– Volume limitations

– Concern with 

temperature increases

11
pH Adjustment

• Advantages

– Preparation of 

concentrated aqueous 

stocks

• Disadvantages

– Molecule specific

– Potential pH effects on 

test solutions

– Low buffering capacity of 

some dilution matrices

12
Saturator columns

• Advantages

– Eliminates concern over 

solvent use

– Single preparation in some 

cases

• Disadvantages

– Pilot work to evaluate 

longevity and consistency

– Limited by flow rates

– Test material needs can be 

great

13
Questions??
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Hydrogeologicterranes and potential yield of water to wells in the Valley and RidgePhysiographic Province in the eastern and southeastern United States**
 
Report
Plates:One | Two | Three | Four | Five
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1422-C
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001059396
 
June 1, 2018
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Nicholas A. Kamisaroff, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person denied.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Newhorizons in astronomy**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:1/1
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001058517
 
May 29, 2018
### SUBCHAPTER II—LANDSAT
### §242b. Reports

#### (a) Information sharing to facilitate reports and analysis

Each subagency of the Department of Homeland Security shall share with CCHT—

(1) any information needed by CCHT to develop the strategy and proposal required under section 4(a);1 and

(2) any additional data analysis to help CCHT better understand the issues surrounding human trafficking.

#### (b) Report to Congress

Not later than 1 year after December 27, 2022, the CCHT Director shall submit a report to Congress that identifies any legislation that is needed to facilitate the Department of Homeland Security's mission to end human trafficking.

#### (c) Annual report on potential human trafficking victims

Not later than 1 year after December 27, 2022, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a report to Congress that includes—

(1) the numbers of screened and identified potential victims of trafficking (as defined in section 7102(17) of title 22) at or near the international border between the United States and Mexico, including a summary of the age ranges of such victims and their countries of origin; and

(2) an update on the Department of Homeland Security's efforts to establish protocols and methods for personnel to report human trafficking, pursuant to the Department of Homeland Security Strategy to Combat Human Trafficking, the Importation of Goods Produced with Forced Labor, and Child Sexual Exploitation, published in January 2020.

(Pub. L. 117–322, §5, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4435.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

CCHT, referred to in text, means the Center for Countering Human Trafficking, see section 242a(a)(1) of this title.

Section 4(a), referred to in subsec. (a)(1), means section 4(a) of Pub. L. 117–322, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4435, which is not classified to the Code.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Countering Human Trafficking Act of 2021, and not as part of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
EXHIBIT 10.3
 R.H. Donnelley Corporation  2009 Long-Term Incentive Program  For Executive Officers
 I. Introduction
 Purposes
 Certain Definitions




---



##### 



provided however
      provided however
   2




---



##### 



provided however
  Administration .
 3




---



##### 



provided however
  II. Terms Of Long-Term Incentive Awards
 Eligibility
 Terms of Long-Term Incentive Awards . In General
 4




---



##### 



Amount of Long-Term Incentive Award and Performance Measures
 Cumulative Free Cash Flow
 Cumulative Free Cash Flow
    
    Percentage of Target Long-Term IncentiveLess than $0
    
    
    0
    %$75 million
    
    
    50
    %$150 million
    
    
    100
    %$225 million
    
    
    150
    %$300 million or more
    
    
    200
    %
 provided however
 Successful Restructuring
 Special Termination Rules and Forfeiture
 Termination by the Participant for Good Reason, by the Company without Cause or
as a Result of the Participants Death or Disability
 5




---



##### 



Any Other Termination
 Payment
 Section 409A .
 III. General
 Effective Date and Term of Program .
 Amendments . provided however
 Non-Transferability .
 Tax and Other Withholding .
 6




---



##### 



No Right of Participation or Employment .
 Unfunded Arrangement .
 Severability; Entire Agreement
 Governing Law .
 7
Sf E P l() E &) 0 II N S () NilI' 

William Karas 

202.4296223 

wkaras@steptoe.com 

Mr. Todd M. Homan 

Director 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

\ Ii'! I{ " l ~" \, I I \ \\ 

January 13,2011 

Re: Transfer to Iberia Operadora 

of Iberia's Business 

Docket DOT -OST -2008-0252 

Dear Mr. Homan: 

1330 Connecticut Avenue. NW 

Washington. DC 20036-1795 

Tel 202.4293000 

Fax 202.429.3902 

steptoe.com 

o 

TJ 

r.y 

w 

..D 

We wish to inform you that, effective January 20,2011, the entire business of Theria 

Lineas Aercas de Espana, S.A. ("Iberia") will transfer to its wholly-owned subsidiary Iberia 

Lineas Aereas de Espana Sociedad Anonima Operadora ("Iberia Operadora"). After the transfer, 

Iberia Operadora will stand in the shoes of iberia with respect to the latter's existing business 

arrangements, including in particular the alliance and joint business arrangements for which the 

Department granted approval and antitrust immunity in the above-referenced docket. The 

transfer wi-II not change those Department-approved arrangements. 

Additional information on the transfer is provided in the joint application of Iberia and 

Iberia Operadora for transfer of foreign air carrier pcrmit and rclated authorizations filed in 

Docket DOT -OST-201 0-0283. 
Mr. Todd M. Homan 

Director, Office of Aviation Analysis 

January 13,2011 

Page 2 of2 

SflPrOI &)OII>..JSO\i"· 

Respectfully submitted, 

~·D~~I (\ G' 

William Karas 

Carol Gosain 

Steptoe & Johnson LLP 

1330 Connecticut Avenue, N. W. 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

Phone: (202) 429-6223 

Fax: (202) 261-0651 

Email: wkaras@stcptoe.com 

cgosain@stcptoc.com 

Attorneys for Iberia Lineas 

Aereas de Espana, S.A. and 

Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana 

Sociedad Anonima Operadora