Page 1 of 10

EPA REGISTRATION DIVISION COMPANY NOTICE OF FILING FOR PESTICIDE 

PETITIONS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER 

EPA Registration Division contact:

Hope Johnson (703) 305-5410

OAT AGRIO CO., LTD.

EPA Company No. 11581

5F8408

EPA has received a pesticide petition (5F8408) from OAT AGRIO CO., LTD., 1-3-1 

Kanda Ogawa-machi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0052, Japan proposing, pursuant to section 

408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 

CFR part 180.

1. by establishing a tolerance for residues of

Flutianil, (Z)-2-[2-fluoro-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenylthio]-2-[3-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1,3-

thiazolidin-2-ylidene]acetonitrile, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on apple, fruit

at 0.2 ppm, apple, juice at 0.03 ppm, apple, wet pomace at 2 ppm, cantaloupe at 0.07 ppm, 

cherry, fruit at 0.4 ppm, cucumber at 0.02 ppm, grape, fruit at 0.7 ppm, grape, juice at 0.2 

ppm, grape, raisins at 0.3 ppm, squash at 0.03 ppm, and strawberry, fruit at 0.3 ppm. EPA 

has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in 

section 408 (d)(2) of FDDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the 

submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data 

may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.

A. Residue Chemistry 

1. Plant metabolism. 

The plant metabolism of flutianil is adequately understood in four diverse crops: apple, cucumber, grape 

and lettuce. The parent compound, flutianil, accounted for the majority of residues extracted in all crops. 

The metabolism of flutianil in plants is understood for the purposes of the proposed tolerances. 

2. Analytical method.

The following analytical method was used for apple, cantaloupe, cherry, cucumber, squash and strawberry

samples: residues were extracted with acetonitrile/water solution and the aqueous sample was cleaned up 

by liquid/liquid partition with hexane. The organic phase was concentrated and further cleaned up using a 

silica gel column. Quantitation was achieved by GC/MSD in selective ion monitoring mode. 

The lowest level of method validation (LLMV) in the apple study was 0.01 ppm. Based on recoveries of

samples fortified at the LLMV, the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were 
Page 2 of 10

calculated as 0.001 ppm and 0.0037 ppm, respectively for the apple RAC, 0.002 ppm and 0.0046 ppm for 

apple juice, and as 0.0003 ppm and 0.00076 ppm, respectively, for apple wet pomace.

The LLMV in the cantaloupe study was 0.010 ppm. Based on recoveries of samples fortified at the LLMV, 

the LOD and LOQ were calculated as 0.001 ppm and 0.0038 ppm, respectively. 

For the cherry study, the LLMV was 0.010 ppm. 

Based on recoveries of samples fortified at the LLMV, the LOD and LOQ were calculated as 0.0009 ppm 

and 0.0027 ppm, respectively in the cucumber study. The LLMV in the cucumber study was 0.01 ppm.

In the squash study, the LLMV in this study was 0.01 ppm. Based on recoveries of samples fortified at the 

LLMV, LOD and LOQ were calculated as 0.001 ppm and 0.0030 ppm, respectively.

The LOD was determined to be 0.0025 ppm for strawberry, and the LOQ was 0.0076 ppm. The LLMV was 

0.010 ppm for strawberry. 

In the grape RAC and PC study, the analytical method was as follows: flutianil residues were analyzed and 

quantified in grapes, grape juice and raisins by gas chromatography after extraction and cleanup. Flutianil 

metabolite OC-56635 residues were analyzed and quantified in grapes, grape juice and raisins by high 

performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectral detection (LCMS/MS). A LOQ of 0.01 

mg/kg was determined for flutianil and OC-56635 in grapes and grape juice. A LOQ of 0.10 mg/kg was 

determined for flutianil and OC-56635 in raisins. The limit of detection was set at 30% of the LOQ.

3. Magnitude of residues.

Apple

Foliar applications of flutianil (V-10118, a 5EC formulation) at a rate of approximately 0.04 lb ai/A each 

were made 4 times (~7 day retreatment interval), for a total of approximately 0.16 lb ai/A in the apple 

magnitude of residues study. The results from the trials show that the maximum residues in/on apple were 

0.095 ppm. V-10118 was also applied at 5X the application rate (approximately 0.2 lb ai/A) at three sites to

provide apples for processing into juice and wet pomace. The results from the trials show that the maximum 

residues in/on apple juice to be 0.016 ppm and wet pomace to be 1 ppm.

Cantaloupe

For cantaloupes, foliar applications of V-10118 at a rate of approximately 0.04 lb ai/A each were made 5 

times (~7 day retreatment interval), for a total of approximately 0.20 lb ai/A. The results from the trials 

show that the maximum residues in/on cantaloupe were 0.042 ppm. 

Cherry

Foliar applications of V-10118 at a rate of approximately 0.04 lb ai/A each were made 4 times (~7 day

retreatment interval), for a total of approximately 0.16 lb ai/A for cherry. Five applications were made at 

the Washington site for a total of approximately 0.20 lb ai/A due to a delay in crop maturity. The results 

from the trials show that the maximum residues in/on cherry were 0.26 ppm.

Cucumber

For cucumbers, six trials were conducted in the field and two trials were conducted in the greenhouse. 
Page 3 of 10

Foliar applications of V-10118 at a rate of approximately 0.04 lb ai/A each were made 5 times (~7 day

retreatment interval), for a total of approximately 0.20 lb ai/A. The maximum residues in/on cucumber were 

0.014 ppm.

Grape

Foliar applications of flutianil at a rate of approximately 0.09 lb ai/ha each were made 5 times (~7 day

retreatment interval), for a total of approximately 0.49 lb ai/ha in the grape residue study. Flutianil residues 

in treated grape samples ranged from <LOQ to 0.4977 ppm. OC-56635 residues in treated grape samples 

ranged from <LOQ to 0.0536 ppm. For grape raisins and juice, flutianil was also applied at 5X the 

application rate (approximately 0.49 lb ai/ha per application) at one site to provide grapes for processing 

into juice and raisins. Flutianil residues in grape juice were found with a maximum residue of 0.2059 

ppm. Flutianil residues in raisins were found with a maximum residue of 0.2993 ppm. OC-56635 residues 

in grape juice were found with a maximum residue of 0.0187 ppm. OC-56635 residues in raisins were 

found with a maximum residue of <LOQ. 

Squash

For squash (summer), the trials were conducted foliar applications of V-10118 at a rate of approximately

0.04 lb ai/A each were made 5 times (~7 day retreatment interval), for a total of approximately 0.20 lb ai/A. 

The results from the trials show that the maximum residue in/on summer squash is 0.021 ppm.

Strawberry

For strawberries, trials foliar applications of V-10118 at a rate of approximately 0.04 lb ai/A each were 

made 5 times (~7 day retreatment interval), for a total of approximately 0.20 lb ai/A. 

At the Florida trial, one additional application was needed to allow the fruit to ripen for a total of 

approximately 0.24 lb ai/A. At the Colorado trial, two additional applications were needed to obtain fruit 

for harvest for a total of approximately 0.28 lb ai/A. The results from the trials show that the maximum 

residues in/on strawberry were 0.24 ppm. 

B. Toxicological Profile

1. Acute toxicity. 

Technical flutianil shows low acute toxicity (Toxicity Category IV) via the oral, dermal and inhalation 

routes of exposure. Flutianil has a very low acute oral (LD50: >5,000 mg/kg bw), dermal (LD50: >5,000 

mg/kg bw) and inhalation toxicity (LC50: >5.17 mg/L air) in male and female rats. Flutianil shows no 

irritation to the eye or skin and shows no skin sensitization potential under the conditions of the guinea pig 

maximization test. There were no acute neurotoxicity concerns. 

2. Genotoxicity. 

Flutianil was tested for its genotoxic potential in a battery of four in vitro or in vivo studies covering all 

required end-points (gene mutations, chromosomal aberrations). There was no evidence of genotoxicity.

3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. 

Flutianil shows no evidence of primary developmental or reproductive effects. In the prenatal 

developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits and in the two-generation reproduction study in rats, 

neither fetal toxicity nor maternal toxicity was present. There was no evidence to suggest that Flutianil 
Page 4 of 10

possessed a teratogenic potential in either species. 

4. Subchronic toxicity.

The subchronic toxicity of Flutianil was investigated in 90-day toxicity studies via the oral route in mouse, 

rat and dog and via inhalation and dermal routes in 28-day toxicity studies in the rat. Rats, dogs, and mice 

tolerated the chemical in excess of the limit dose without mortalities or clinical signs. The NOAEL for oral 

studies were 1387 mg/kg, 1271 mg/kg, and 1000 mg/kg in mouse, rat and dog respectively. The NOEL in 

the rat for dermal exposure was >1000 mg/kg and for inhalation was 14.4 mg/kg (100 mg/m3).

5. Chronic toxicity. 

The chronic toxicity of Flutianil was evaluated in the dog, rat, and mouse. Oncogenic potential was 

evaluated in rats and mice. The NOAEL from the one-year feeding study in the dog was 1000 mg/kg 

bw/day. The NOAEL for the rat was 249 mg/kg, the highest dose evaluated. The NOAEL in the oncogenic 

mouse study was 1063 mg/kg bw/day. No flutianil induced carcinogenicity was observed. Flutianil is not 

likely to be carcinogenic, based on rat and mouse bioassays as well as negative in vivo and in vitro

mutagenic effects.

6. Animal metabolism. 

The elimination of flutianil was very rapid with over 90% being eliminated in the first 24 hours with little 

absorbed material. Absorption of [14C]-flutianil was low and biotransformation of absorbed radioactivity

was rapid, giving rise to an extensive range and number of metabolites. The number and nature of 

metabolites and difference in radio-profiles for animals dosed with [trifluoromethyl14C] and [2-

methoxyphenyl-U14C] labelled flutianil suggested that cleavage of the molecule was a significant process in

the metabolic pathway. This was observed in both the rat and goat metabolism studies.

7. Metabolite toxicology. 

One major soil metabolite was evaluated in a 28-day study which showed a NOAEL of 1380 mg/kg, which 

was similar to parent flutianil. Mutagenicity testing (in vitro bacterial reverse mutation and mouse 

lymphoma gene mutation and in vivo mouse micronucleus) was conducted with three major metabolites and 

all were negative. 

8. Endocrine disruption. 

The toxicology database for Flutianil is current and complete. Studies in this database include evaluation of 

the potential effects on reproduction and development and an evaluation of the pathology of the endocrine 

organs following short- or long-term exposure. No endocrine disruption is expected to be present following 

exposure to Flutianil.

9. Immunotoxicity.

Flutianil was evaluated in a 28-day dietary immunotoxicity study. The NOEL was greater than 1251 mg/kg.

There was no effect on immune function.

B. Toxicological Endpoints
Page 5 of 10

A summary of the toxicological endpoints for flutianil used for human risk assessment is shown in the 

following table:

Doses and Toxicological Endpoints for Flutianil

Exposure/Scenario

Dose Used in Risk Assessment, 

Interspecies, Intraspecies and 

any Traditional UF

FQPA SF and Level 

of

Concern for Risk 

Assessment

Study and Toxicological Effects

Acute Dietary 

(females 13-49 years 

of age)

Not selected NA No toxicological endpoint 

attributable to a single exposure 

was identified in the available 

toxicology studies.

Acute Dietary 

(General population 

including infants and 

children)

Not selected NA No toxicological endpoint 

attributable to a single exposure 

was identified in the available 

toxicology studies.

Chronic Dietary (All 

populations)

NOAEL = 249 mg/kg/day

UF = 100

Chronic RfD = 2.49 mg/kg/day

FQPA SF = 1x 

cPAD = Chronic RfD 

Combined Chronic Toxicity/

Carcinogenicity Study in Rat 

(MRID No. 49490550)

LOAEL = Not identified

NOAEL male: 249 mg/kg

Incidental Oral ShortTerm

(1 – 30 days)

NOAEL =1000 mg/kg/day

UF = 100

LOC for MOE = 100 Developmental Toxicity in Rabbit 

(MRID No. 49490545)

LOAEL = Not identified

NOAEL = 1000 mg/kg

Incidental Oral 

Intermediate-Term (1 

- 6 months)

NOAEL = 1271 mg/kg/day

UF = 100

LOC for MOE = 100 Subchronic Oral Toxicity in Rat 

(MRID No. 49490537)

LOAEL = Not identified

NOAEL 1271 mg/kg

Dermal (All 

durations)

NA NA No systemic toxicity was 

identified in the dermal 28-day 

study; Highest Dose Tested was 

1,000 mg/kg/day.

Inhalation (All 

durations)

NOAEL =14.4 mg/kg/day

UF = 100

LOC for MOE = 100

Residential

LOC for MOE = 100

Occupational

28-Day Inhalation Toxicity in Rat 

(MRID No. 49490541)

LOAEL = 1000 mg/m3based on 

organ weight changes and 

histopathological changes in liver 

and thyroid. (144 mg/kg 

conversion)

Cancer (oral, dermal, 

inhalation)

Classification: “Not likely to be carcinogenic in humans.''

UF = uncertainty factor, FQPA SF = any additional safety factor retained due to concerns unique to the FQPA, NOAEL = no observed adverse effect 

level, LOAEL = lowest observed adverse effect level, PAD = population adjusted dose (a = acute, c = chronic) RfD = reference dose, MOE = margin 

of exposure, LOC = level of concern, NA = Not Applicable

C. Exposure Assessment

1. Dietary Exposure

a. Acute exposure

Acute dietary risk assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide if a toxicological study has indicated 

the possibility of an effect of concern occurring as a result of a one day or single exposure. An acute risk 
Page 6 of 10

assessment was not performed. No toxicological endpoint attributable to a single (acute) dietary exposure 

was identified.

b. Chronic exposure

A chronic dietary risk assessment was conducted for flutianil use on apple, cantaloupe, cherry, cucumber, 

grape, squash and strawberry at the proposed tolerances using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model 

(DEEM-FCIDTM, Version 4.02) which uses food translations based on EPA/USDA FCID recipe set as of 

August 2014. The chronic dietary risk estimates are below HED’s level of concern for the general U.S. 

population and all population subgroups. The most highly exposed population subgroups (0.1% of the RfD) 

were children 1-2 years old and children 3-5 years old.

Summary of Chronic Dietary (Food + Drinking Water) Exposure and Risk for Flutianil

Population Subgroup Exposure (mg/kg bw/day) Percent of RfD

1

US population 0.000414 0.0%

All infants ( < 1 year old) 0.000901 0.0%

Children (1-2 years old) 0.002257 0.1%

Children (3-5 years old) 0.001446 0.1%

Children (6-12 years old) 0.000642 0.0%

Youth (13-19 years old) 0.000239 0.0%

Adults (20-49 years old) 0.000243 0.0%

Adults (50+ years old) 0.000304 0.8%

Females (13-49 years old) 0.000272 0.0%

1 RfD = 2.49 mg/kg/day

c. Cancer

In accordance with the EPA Final Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment, flutianil may be classified as 

“Not likely to be carcinogenic in humans” and is not expected to pose a cancer risk to humans. Animal 

evidence demonstrates the lack of carcinogenic effects in both sexes in well-designed and well-conducted 

studies in rats and mice.

2. Non-dietary exposure

a. Occupational exposure

Flutianil is formulated a 5% emulsifiable concentrate to be applied to strawberry, cantaloupe, cucumber, 

summer squash, apple, cherry, and grape using groundboom or airblast spray equipment. The potential 

exposures and associated risks for handlers mixing, loading and applying flutianil and for workers reentering treated areas are based on the proposed label for GATTEN® fungicide (flutianil 5% liquid 

formulation). The maximum application rate is 0.04 lb ai/acre. A maximum of four to five applications are 

allowed per year, depending upon crop, with a 7-day application interval. 

Short- and intermediate-term dermal and inhalation exposures are predicted for occupational handlers 

mixing, loading, and applying flutianil. Since flutianil-specific exposure data are not available, handler 

scenarios were assessed using the EPA Occupational Pesticide Handler Unit Exposure Surrogate Reference 
Page 7 of 10

Table - Revised March 2013. The occupational handler exposure and risk estimates for flutianil are listed 

below.

Occupational Handler Exposure & Risk Estimates for Flutianil 

Short- & 

IntermediateTerm

Exposure

Unit Exposure1

(mg/lb ai handled)

Application 

Rate

(lb ai/A)

Units 

Treated2

(A/day)

Average 

Daily Dose3

(mg ai/kg 

bw/day)

Short- & 

Intermediate-Term

MOE4

Mixer/Loader – Liquids – Open Loading for Airblast Application

Dermal 0.0376 0.04 40 0.000158 8,000,000

Inhalation 0.000219 0.04 40 0.00000438 3,300,000

Mixer/Loader – Liquids – Open Loading for Groundboom Application

Dermal 0.0376 0.04 80 0.000316 4,000,000

Inhalation 0.000219 0.04 80 0.00000876 1,600,000

Applicator – Liquids – Airblast

Dermal 1.59 0.04 40 0.00668 190,000

Inhalation 0.00471 0.04 40 0.0000942 150,000

Applicator – Liquids – Groundboom

Dermal 0.0161 0.04 80 0.000135 9,400,000

Inhalation 0.00471 0.04 80 0.000188 76,000

1 Unit Exposure (UE) = mg ai/lb ai handled from Occupational Pesticide Handler Unit Exposure Surrogate Reference Table - Revised March 2013. 

PPE = long-sleeve shirt, long pants, socks, shoes, gloves.

2 Units Treated taken from Science Advisory Council for Exposure, Standard Operating Procedure 9.1, Standard Values for Daily Acres Treated in 

Agriculture, Rev. 25, September 2001.

3 Average Daily Dose (ADD) = Unit Exposure x Application Rate x Units Treated x Absorption Factor ÷ Body Weight (80 kg). Dermal absorption 

factor = 21%, inhalation absorption factor = 100%.

4 Margin of Exposure (MOE) = NOAEL (mg/kg/day) ÷ ADD (mg/kg/day); NOAELdermal = 1271 mg/kg/day, NOAELinhalation = 14.4 mg/kg/day for all 

durations.

Short- and intermediate-term dermal exposures are predicted for post-application exposure to workers 

performing typical agricultural tasks. Since flutianil-specific exposure data are not available, postapplication scenarios were assessed using Science Advisory Council for Exposure (ExpoSAC) Policy 3 –

Revised March 2013. The occupational post-application exposure and risk estimates for flutianil are listed 

below.

Occupational Post-Application Exposure & Risk Estimates for Flutianil 

Short- & 

IntermediateTerm

Exposure

Crop

Activity

Transfer 

Coefficient1

(cm2/hr)

Application 

Rate

(lb ai/A)

Average 

Daily Dose2

(mg ai/kg 

bw/day)

Short- & 

Intermediate-Term

MOE3

Dermal Strawberry

Hand Harvest 1,100 0.04 0.0026 490,000

Dermal

Cantaloupe, 

Cucumber, Summer 

Squash

Hand Set Irrigation

1,900 0.04 0.0045 280,000

Dermal Apple, Cherry

Thinning Fruit 3,600 0.04 0.0085 150,000

Dermal Grapes

Tying/Training, 

10,100 0.04 0.024 53,000
Page 8 of 10

Occupational Post-Application Exposure & Risk Estimates for Flutianil 

Short- & 

IntermediateTerm

Exposure

Crop

Activity

Transfer 

Coefficient1

(cm2/hr)

Application 

Rate

(lb ai/A)

Average 

Daily Dose2

(mg ai/kg 

bw/day)

Short- & 

Intermediate-Term

MOE3

Hand Harvest, Leaf 

Pulling

1 Transfer Coefficient from Science Advisory Council for Exposure (ExpoSAC) Policy 3 – Revised March 2013. PPE = long-sleeve shirt, long 

pants, socks, shoes.

3 Average Daily Dose (ADD) = Transfer Coefficient (TC) x Dislodgeable Foliar Residue (DFR) x Duration * Absorption Factor ÷ Body Weight 

(80 kg). DFR = 25% * Application Rate, Duration = 8 hrs/day, Dermal Absorption Factor = 21%.

4 Margin of Exposure (MOE) = NOAEL (mg/kg/day) ÷ ADD (mg/kg/day); NOAELdermal = 1271 mg/kg/day for all durations.

All occupational handler and post-application exposures from agricultural applications of flutianil result in 

MOEs greater than 100 and therefore do not exceed HED’s level of concern. 

b. Residential (Non-occupational) exposure and risk

There are no proposed uses of flutianil which would lead to direct exposure to resident, either through 

mixing, loading and application, or due to post application exposure; however, there are potential indirect 

post-application exposures to adults and children due to drift onto residential lawns from agricultural 

applications. These indirect post-application scenarios were assessed based on the proposed label for 

GATTEN® fungicide (flutianil 5% liquid formulation) using draft Residential Exposure Assessment 

Standard Operating Procedures - Addenda 1: Consideration of Spray Drift (November 1, 2013). The 

greatest indirect residential exposure potential is from groundboom application to cantaloupe, cucumber, 

summer squash or strawberries. The residential post-application exposure and risk estimates for flutianil are 

listed below.

Residential Exposure & Risk Estimates for Flutianil 

Short- & 

Intermediate-Term

Exposure

Lifestage

Drift 

Application 

Rate1(lb ai/A)

Average Daily 

Dose2(mg 

ai/kg bw/day)

Short- & IntermediateTerm MOE3

High Contact Lawn

Dermal Adult 0.0075 0.00059 2,200,000

Dermal 1 to <2 years 0.0075 0.0012 1,100,000

Hand-to Mouth

Incidental Oral 1 to <2 years 0.0075 0.00011 11,000,000

Object-to-Mouth

Incidental Oral 1 to <2 years 0.0075 0.0000035 370,000,000

Soil Ingestion

Incidental Oral 1 to <2 years 0.0075 0.00000025 5,000,000,000

D. Cumulative Effects

Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of toxicity: Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the 

FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency

consider “available information” concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and 

“other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.”
Page 9 of 10

Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common 

mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to flutianil and any

other substances, and flutianil does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. 

Therefore for the purposes of this tolerance action, EPA has not assumed that flutianil has a common 

mechanism of toxicity with other substances.

E. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

In general, Section 408 of the FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an additional ten-fold margin of safety

for infants and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the 

completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure unless EPA determines that a different margin of 

safety will be safe for infants and children. Margins of safety are incorporated into EPA risk assessments 

either directly through use of a MOE analysis or through using uncertainty (safety) factors in calculating a 

dose level that poses no appreciable risk to humans.

Prenatal developmental toxicity studies in rabbits and rats showed no qualitative/qualitative evidence of 

increased susceptibility in offspring. The 2-generation reproduction study in rats did not show evidence of 

qualitative/qualitative evidence of increased susceptibility in offspring.

The toxicology database for flutianil is complete. The data are sufficient for endpoint selection for 

exposure/risk assessment scenarios and for evaluation of the requirements under the Food Quality

Protection Act (FQPA). Evidence of quantitative and qualitative susceptibility of offspring was not 

observed, and therefore, the FQPA 10x safety factor was reduced to 1x.

F. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

The proposed uses are the first uses proposed for flutianil in the United States. 

1. Acute risk

An acute risk assessment was not performed. No toxicological endpoint attributable to a single (acute) 

dietary exposure was identified. Therefore, acute risk from flutianil exposure to is not expected.

2. Chronic risk

Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for chronic exposure, it was concluded that exposure 

to flutianil from food and water will utilize 0.0% of the RfD for the U.S. population, and 0.1% of the RfD

for children 1-2 years old and children 3-5 years old, the subpopulations at greatest exposure. Based on the 

use pattern, chronic residential exposure to residues of flutianil is not expected. Therefore, the aggregate 

exposure is not expected to exceed 100% of the RfD.

3. Short-term risk

Short-term aggregate exposure takes into account residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food and 

water. There are no proposed uses of flutianil which would lead to direct exposure to resident, either 

through mixing, loading and application or due to post application exposure; however, there are potential 

indirect post-application exposures to adults and children due to drift onto residential lawns from 
Page 10 of 10

agricultural applications. Short-term aggregate exposure is not expected to exceed the Agency's level of 

concern.

4. Intermediate-term risk

Intermediate-term aggregate exposure takes into account non-dietary, non-occupational exposure plus 

chronic exposure to food and water. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure is not expected to exceed the 

Agency's level of concern.

Cancer risk

Flutianil should be classified as, “Not likely to be carcinogenic in humans.'' Flutianil is not expected to pose 

a cancer risk.

5. Determination of safety

Based on these risk assessments, it is concluded that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 

to the general population and to infants and children from aggregate exposure to flutianil residues.

G. International Tolerances

Tolerances have been established in Japan for the following crops: eggplant (0.2 ppm), cucumber

(including gherkin (0.2 ppm)), pumpkin (including squash (0.05 ppm)), watermelon (0.05 ppm), melons 

(0.05 ppm) and strawberry (0.5 ppm). Tolerances have been established in Korea for the following crops: 

green and red pepper (0.5 ppm), strawberry (0.3 ppm), melon (0.05 ppm), watermelon (0.05 ppm), 

cucumber (0.05 ppm), Korean melon (0.05 ppm) and sweet pepper (0.5 ppm).