alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State ex rel. Lear Operations Corp. v. Crispen , 124 Ohio St.3d 444, 2010-Ohio-686.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . L EAR O PERATIONS C ORPORATION , A PPELLEE , v . C RISPEN , A PPELLANT , ET AL . [Cite as State ex rel. Lear Operations Corp. v. Crispen , 124 Ohio St.3d 444, 2010-Ohio-686.] Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2008-2326

— Submitted February 16, 2010

— Decided March 4, 2010.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 07AP-428, 2008-Ohio-5256.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
M OYER , C.J., and L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.
P FEIFER , J., dissents and would reverse th e judgment of the court of appeals.

__________________ Constance A. Snyder, for appell ee Lear Operations Corporation. Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer and Martha Joyce Wilson, for appellant. Richard Cordray, Attorney Genera l, and Sandra E. Pinkerton, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

______________________
|   | Exhibit 32 |
|--------|------------|

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert C. Stempel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Sanjeev Kumar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley* Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that based on his knowledge:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/S/ Robert C. Stempel                 
Robert C. Stempel

Chief Executive Officer

November 9, 2006

 

 

/S/ Sanjeev Kumar                      
Sanjeev Kumar

Chief Financial Officer

November 9, 2006
#### § 238.3 Definitions.

Unless otherwise noted, this term and its definition are for the purposes of this part.

*Assistance (as in “DoD Assistance to Non-Government, Entertainment-Oriented Media Productions”).* The variety of support that the DoD can provide. The assistance ranges from supplying technical advice during script development, to allowing access to military installations for production.
Third Department,

April, 1962

(April 6, 1962)

In decisions Nos. 1-8: Present—Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.

#### In the Matter of Ralph T. Roberts, Appellant, v. William S. Holts, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted by default, without costs.
#### STATE v. ANDERSON

No. 370P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 635

Notice of appeal by defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed 4 September 1997. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 September 1997.
#### In the Matter of Frank Egitto, Appellant, v. Paul D. McGinnis, as Commissioner of the Department of Correction, et al., Respondents.

Petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court which dismissed the- petition in a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. Petitioner sought an order directing that service of a sentence for a second felony conviction begin as of the date of imposition thereof. On January 28, 1946 petitioner was convicted of robbery, second degree, and sentenced to a term of 5 to 10 years. On June 7,1950 he was released on parole, owing 4 years, 11 months and 4 days on his maximum sentence. On June 6, 1951, while on parole, he was convicted of a second felony (robbery, second degree, while armed), and sentenced as a second felony offender for a term of 7% years minimum and 15 years maximum, and an additional sentence of 5 to 10 years under section 1944 of the Penal Law, or a total sentence of 12 years, 6 months minimum and 25 years maximum. Peti*687tioner, having been convicted of a felony while on parole, was compelled to serve the balance of his maximum term under the 1946 sentence, amounting to 4 years, 11 months and 4 days from the time of his release on parole on June 7, 1950. (Correction Law, §§ 219, 242.) Thus his maximum sentence on the 1946 conviction did not expire until May 19, 1956, and service on his sentence on the 1951 conviction did not start until that date. (Penal Law, § 2190, subd. 2.) Petitioner relies upon chapter 473 of the Laws of 1960, effective July 1, 1960, which, in effect, gave discretion to the Parole Board in respect to the service of delinquent time (which had theretofore been mandatory) where a person on parole is convicted of a second felony. However, chapter 473, by its express terms is not retroactive, providing, in part, that the act “ shall not apply to prisoners who upon the effective date of this act have completed service of such delinquent time ”. Such is petitioner’s status. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.
#### R. J. Steven, appellee, v. The Combination Fountain Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,790.

Action for deceit. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macon county; the Hon. James S. Baldwin, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 6, 1925.

Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Vail, Pogue *&*Allen, for appellant.

Wiley & Morey, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Shurtleff

delivered the opinion of the court.
### SUBCHAPTER I—DAIRY PROMOTION PROGRAM
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1475 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1475

  Expressing support for the designation of September 2024 as ``Peace 
    Month'' and calling on Congress to take action to promote peace.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 2024

 Ms. Norton submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the designation of September 2024 as ``Peace 
    Month'' and calling on Congress to take action to promote peace.

Whereas the United Nations designated September 21 ``International Day of 
        Peace'', otherwise known as Peace Day;
Whereas the United Nations General Assembly declared Peace Day as a day devoted 
        to ``commemorating and strengthening the ideals of peace, both within 
        and among all nations and peoples'';
Whereas all United Nations member states, organizations, regional and 
        nongovernmental organizations, and individuals are encouraged to 
        celebrate and recognize global peace efforts on Peace Day;
Whereas Peace Day represents shared hopes of an end to conflict in all forms;
Whereas the United Nations calls for a 24-hour global cease fire on Peace Day;
Whereas this year's Peace Day theme is ``Cultivating a Culture of Peace'';
Whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a milestone development in 
        contemporary human history promoting peace and well-being worldwide;
Whereas global peace promotion efforts improve the lives of Americans and all 
        peoples;
Whereas the United States has a long history of promoting peace and human rights 
        at home and abroad; and
Whereas September would be an appropriate month to designate as Peace Month: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Peace Month''; and
            (2) calls on Congress to promote peace, both at home and 
        abroad.
                                 <all>
```
#### Motor Car Securities Corporation, appellee, v. C. A. Miller, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,352.

Motion to vacate judgment by confession and for leave to defend. Motion denied. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John A. Bugee, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third *646division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

M. L. Carmody, for appellant. E. I. Rothbart, for appellee.

Seymour M. Lewis, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 4 (Thursday, January 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 1122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29313]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 28, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service 
Contract 187 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-61, CP2021-63.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2020-29313 Filed 1-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
#### § 552.32 Authority to acquire real estate and interests therein.

While the Federal Government has the inherent power to acquire land for its constitutional purposes, this power can be exercised only at the discretion of Congress (Van Brocklin v. Tennessee, 117 U.S. 151; 29 L. Ed. 845; 6 S. Ct. 670). No land shall be purchased on account of the United States, except under a law authorizing such purchase (R. S. 3736; 41 U.S.C. 14). No real estate not in Federal ownership shall be acquired by a military department, except as such acquisition is or shall be expressly authorized by law (section 501(b), Act July 27, 1954; Pub. L. 534, 83d Congress; 68 Stat. 560).
#### § 2103.52 Classification Review Committee.

The NSC Classification Review Committee shall be chaired by the Staff Secretary of the National Security Council. The Committee shall decide appeals from denials of declassification requests submitted pursuant to section 3-5 of Executive Order 12065. The Committee shall consist of the chairperson, the NSC Director of Freedom of Information, and the NSC Staff member with primary subject matter responsibility for the material under review.
#### § 552.104 Disposition of confiscated/seized weapons.

All weapons, ammunition, explosives or other devices defined in this regulation, that are confiscated pursuant to the commission of a crime or violation of this or other regulation or found unsecured/unattended on the installation, will be immediately turned over to the military police, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (USACIDC), or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for investigation, retention as evidence, or other lawful disposition. When retention for investigation or evidence is no longer required by military police, USACIDC, or other law enforcement or judicial agencies, the items will be disposed of under the provisions of AR 195-5, Evidence Procedures.
§ 536.17 Single-service claims responsibility (DODD 5515.8 and DODD 5515.9). ( a ) *Assignment for DOD claims.* The army is responsible for processing DOD claims pursuant to DODD 5515.9 (posted on the USARCS Web site; for the address see § 536.2(a)).
( b ) *Statutes and agreements.* DOD has assigned single-service responsibility for the settlement of certain claims in certain countries, pursuant to DODD 5515.8 (posted on the USARCS Web site; for the address see § 536.2(a)) under the following statutes and agreements: ( 1 ) FCA (10 U.S.C. 2734);
( 2 ) MCA (10 U.S.C. 2733);
( 3 ) Status of Forces Agreements (10 U.S.C. 2734a and 2734b);
( 4 ) NATO SOFA (4 U.S.T. 1792, Treaties and International Acts Series (T.I.A.S.) 2846) and other similar agreements;
( 5 ) FCCA (31 U.S.C. 3711-3720E) and FMCRCA (42 U.S.C. 2651-2653);
( 6 ) Claims not cognizable under any other provision of law, 10 U.S.C. 2737; and
( 7 ) Advance payments, 10 U.S.C. 2736.
( c ) *Specified foreign countries.* Responsibility for the settlement of claims cognizable under the laws listed above has been assigned to military departments pursuant to DODD 5515.8, as supplemented by executive agreement and other competent directives.
( d ) *When claims responsibility has not been assigned.* When necessary to implement contingency plans, the unified or specified commander with authority over the geographic area in question may, on an interim basis before receiving confirmation and approval from the General Counsel, DOD, assign single-service responsibility for processing claims in countries where such assignment has not already been made.
Note to § 536.17 :
See also § 536.32 for information on transferring claims among armed services branches.
#### § 1609.5 Suspension.

The Director of Selective Service may suspend from duty any uncompensated person engaged in the administration of the Selective Service Law pending his consideration of the advisability of removing such person.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John S. Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment
No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report of Sybase, Inc. for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Sybase, Inc. By:
    
    /S/ JOHN S. CHENName:
    
    John S. ChenTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer and President
 I, Pieter A. Van der Vorst, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report of Sybase, Inc. on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sybase,
Inc. By:
    
    /S/ PIETER A. VAN DER VORSTName:
    
    Pieter A. Van der VorstTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Complainant Exhibit C-3: Video recording of deposition of Jaime Tomchik 

A hard copy of this exhibit is on file with the FAA Docket Clerk at: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20597 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Phone: (202) 385-8229
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOperational Overview for UAS Integration in the NAS Project Flight Test Series 3The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration in the National Airspace System Project has conducted a series of flight tests intended to support the reduction of barriers that prevent unmanned aircraft from flying without the required waivers from the Federal Aviation Administration. The 2015 Flight Test Series 3, supported two separate test configurations. The first configuration investigated the timing of Detect and Avoid alerting thresholds using a radar equipped unmanned vehicle and multiple live intruders flown at varying encounter geometries.Document ID20180002002Acquisition SourceArmstrong Flight Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsValkov, Steffi B.*(Jacobs Technology, Inc. Edwards AFB, CA, United States)*Sternberg, Daniel*(Jacobs Technology, Inc. Edwards AFB, CA, United States)*Marston, Michael*(Jacobs Technology, Inc. Edwards AFB, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 22, 2018Publication DateMarch 1, 2018Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberAFRC-E-DAA-TN44848NASA/TM-2018-219540Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NND08RR01BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsUAS in the NASflight testingAvailable DownloadsNameType20180002002.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Seymour Weisman et al., Appellants, v. Abraham Kopf, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 24, 1959, denying their motion to open their default, vacate the dismissal of their complaint and permit them to file their statement of readiness and restore the action to the Trial Calendar. The action was dismissed pursuant to rule 302 of the Rules of Civil Practice after the lapse of one year from the time that it was struck from the calendar because of appellants’ failure to file a statement of readiness (see Rules App. Div. [2d Dept.], Special Rule, eff. January 15, 1957, as amd.). Order affirmed, without costs. The dismissal took place on October 2, 1958. Thereafter, in November, 1958, plaintiffs instituted a second action in which the complaint is identical with the complaint in this action. Eight months after the dismissal of this action, plaintiffs made the present motion to open their default. To open his default the moving party must submit an affidavit showing a sufficient excuse for his default and merit in his action. *{Walsh*v. *Ben Riley’s Arrowhead Inn,*2 A D 2d 714.) It is our opinion that plaintiffs here have not met this test. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

▲

▲ ★

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF USMX, INC.
                          FORM 10-K - December 31, 1996
                                   EXHIBIT 22

                                                                    Percent
              Subsidiary              Place of Incorporation         Owned
----------------------------------    ----------------------    ---------------
<S>                                   <C>                              <C>
USMX of Alaska, Inc.                  Alaska                           100%

USMX  of Montana, Inc.                Montana                          100%

USMX of Nevada, Inc.                  Nevada                           100%

USMX of Utah, Inc.                    Delaware                         100%

USMX Mining, Inc.                     British Columbia                 100%

MXUS S.A. de C. V.                    Mexico                           100%

USMX de Costa Rica C. V.              Costa Rica                       100%

CompaOia Minera USMX de
Chile Limitada                        Chile                            100%

Southern Gold Resources (USA), Inc.   Colorado                          80%

Mega Minerals S. A.                   Ecuador                          100%

</TABLE>
### §794. Limitation on length of certain noncompetitive contracts

#### (a) Regulations

The Secretary shall promulgate regulations applicable to contracts described in subsection (c) to restrict the contract period of any such contract entered into using procedures other than competitive procedures pursuant to the exception provided in paragraph (2) of section 3304(a) of title 41 to the minimum contract period necessary—

(1) to meet the urgent and compelling requirements of the work to be performed under the contract; and

(2) to enter into another contract for the required goods or services through the use of competitive procedures.

#### (b) Specific contract period

The regulations promulgated under subsection (a) shall require the contract period to not to exceed 1 150 days, unless the Secretary determines that exceptional circumstances apply.

#### (c) Covered contracts

This section applies to any contract in an amount greater than the simplified acquisition threshold (as defined by section 134 of title 41) entered into by the Department to facilitate response to or recovery from a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster.

(Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §695, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1460.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (a), "paragraph (2) of section 3304(a) of title 41" substituted for "paragraph (2) of section 303(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 253(c))" on authority of Pub. L. 111–350, §6(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3854, which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.

In subsec. (c), "section 134 of title 41" substituted for "section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)" on authority of Pub. L. 111–350, §6(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3854, which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.

1 So in original. Probably should be "period not to exceed".