alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 3.i.1**

**ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT**

**TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**ZAMAGE DIGITAL IMAGING, INC.**

Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Corporation Code, the Undersigned Corporation adopts the following
amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.

The following amendment of the Articles of Incorporation was adopted by the shareholder consent on November 15,
2001, said articles are hereby amended and shall read as follows:
________________________________________________________________

**Article I**

Name

The name of the corporation is Provectus Pharmaceutical, Inc.

**Article IV**

**Capitalization**

Section 1.  The authorized capital of this corporation shall consist of the following stock: One hundred million
(100,000,000) common shares, par value $.001 per share. Each common share shall have equal rights as to voting and in
the event of dissolution and liquidation. There shall be no cumulative voting by shareholders.
________________________________________________________________

The number of shares outstanding at the time of adoption was 1,179,567; and the number of shares entitled to vote
thereon was the same.

The number of shares represented at the meeting of the shareholders was 1,000,000. All shares voted in favor of the
amendment. The shares represented a majority of the issued and outstanding shares. There were no shares voting against
the amendment.

Effective the 1st day of April 2002

__________________________

Kelly Adams

President
§ 536.128 Effect of disciplinary action, voluntary restitution, or contributory negligence for claims under the UCMJ. ( a ) *Disciplinary action.* Administrative action under Article 139, UCMJ, and this subpart is entirely separate and distinct from disciplinary action taken under other sections of the UCMJ or other administrative actions. Because action under both Article 139, UCMJ, and this subpart requires independent findings on issues other than guilt or innocence, a soldier's conviction or acquittal of claim-related charges is not dispositive of liability under Article 139, UCMJ.
( b ) *Voluntary restitution.* The approval authority may terminate Article 139 proceedings without findings if the soldier voluntarily makes full restitution to the claimant.
( c ) *Contributory negligence.* A claim otherwise cognizable and meritorious is payable whether or not the claimant was negligent.
#### § 203.1 Authority.

Part 203 is issued under the authority of section 2705 of Title 10, United States Code. In 1994, Congress authorized the Department of Defense (DoD) to develop a program to facilitate public participation by providing technical assistance to local community members of Restoration Advisory Boards (RABs) and Technical Review Committees (TRCs) (section 326 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, Pub.L. 103-337). In 1996, Congress revised this authority (section 324 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, Pub.L. 104-112). It is pursuant to this revised authority, which is codified as new subsection (3) of section 2705, that the Department of Defense issues this part.
§ 537.18 Settlement authority for maritime claims. ( a ) The Secretary of the Army, the Army General Counsel as designee of the Secretary, or other designee of the Secretary may compromise an affirmative claim brought by the United States in any amount. A claim settled or compromised in a net amount exceeding $500,000 will be investigated and processed and, if approved by the Secretary of the Army or his or her designee, certified to Congress for final approval.
( b ) TJAG, TAJAG, the Commander USARCS, the Chief Counsel COE, or Division or District Counsel Offices may settle or compromise and receive payment on a claim by the United States under this part if the amount to be received does not exceed $100,000. These authorities may also terminate collection of claims for the convenience of the government in accordance with the standards specified by the DOJ.
( c ) An SJA or a chief of a command claims service and heads of ACOs may receive payment for the full amount of a claim not exceeding $100,000, or compromise any claim in which the amount to be recovered does not exceed $50,000 and the amount claimed does not exceed $100,000.
( d ) Any money collected under this authority shall be deposited into the U.S. General Treasury, except that money collected on civil works claims in favor of the United States pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 “shall be placed to the credit of the appropriation for the improvement of the harbor or waterway in which the damage occurred * * *” (33 U.S.C. 412; 33 U.S.C. 571).
§ 635.9 Release of information. ( a ) Release of information from Army records to agencies outside DoD will be governed by 32 CFR part 518, 32 CFR part 505, AR 600-37, Unfavorable Information (Available at *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r600_37.pdf*), and this part. Procedures for release of certain other records and information is contained in AR 20-1, Inspector General Activities and Procedures (available at *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r20_1.pdf*), AR 27-20, Claims (available at *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r27_20.pdf*), AR 27-40, Litigation (available at *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r27_40.pdf*), AR 40-66, Medical Record Administration and Healthcare Documentation (available at *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r40_66.pdf*), AR 195-2, Criminal Investigation Activities (available at *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r195_2.pdf*), AR 360-1, The Army Public Affairs Program (available at *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r360_1.pdf*), and AR 600-85, The Army Substance Abuse Program (available at *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r600_85.pdf*). Installation drug and alcohol offices may be provided an extract of DA Form 3997 (Military Police Desk Blotter) for offenses involving the use of alcohol or drugs (for example, drunk driving, drunk and disorderly conduct, or positive urinalysis).
( b ) Installation PM/DES are the release authorities for military police records under their control. They may release criminal record information to other activities as prescribed in 32 CFR part 518 and 32 CFR part 505, and this part.
( c ) Authority to deny access to criminal records information rests with the initial denial authority (IDA) for the FOIA and the denial authority for Privacy Acts cases, as addressed in 32 CFR part 518 and 32 CFR part 505.
On September 1, 2006, Mittal Steel Company N.V. (the "Company") granted 3,920,050 options to purchase its Class A Shares to certain executive board members, members of senior management and key employees of the Company at an exercise price of U.S.$33.755 per share (the "Option Grant"). The Option Grant was made pursuant to the Company's Global Stock Option Plan, dated September 15, 1999, and as amended on February 17, 2003 and May 15, 2006.

 

As part of the Option Grant, Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal received 100,000 stock options, Mr. Aditya Mittal received 75,000 stock options, Mr. Malay Mukherjee received 60,000 stock options, Mr. Sudhir Maheshwari received 33,000 stock options and Mr. Bhikam C. Agarwal received 33,000 stock options. The stock options expire on September 1, 2016 and will vest in one-thirds on September 1, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.

 

As required under Dutch law, the Option Grant was reported to the Autoriteit Financiele Markten on September 1, 2006.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

| Mittal Steel Company N.V.

Hofplein 20

3032 AC  Rotterdam

The Netherlands | T +31 10 217 88 00

F +31 10 217 88 88

www.mittalsteel.com

 

Registeredoffice as postal address

Registered no: 24 27 54 28 |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
No. 8096.

#### State ex rel. Sheets, Attorney General, *v.*The Cincinnati & Eastern Electric Railway Co.

(Decided September 29, 1903.)

Quo Warranto.

*Mr. J. M. Sheets,*attorney general; *Mr. G. H. Jones,*assistant attorney general, and *Mr. F. G. Rector,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. E. G. Kinkead*and *Mr. H. M. Daugherty,*for defendants in error.

Demurrer to supplemental answer overruled and petition dismissed on the ground that *quo warranto*is not the proper remedy, *State ex rel.*v. *Railroad Co.,*50 Ohio St., 239.

Burkht, C. J., Spear, Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew, JJ., concur.
#### THOMPSON, Appellant, v. THOMPSON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by May A. Thompson against John R. Thompson.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

CHESTER, J., dissents.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6596

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ULISES KEVELIER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-62) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 30, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Ulises Kevelier, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Victoria WatfordMcKinney, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ulises Kevelier appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Our review of the record reveals that the Government was not required by the plea agreement to file a motion for reduction of sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDynamic assessment of B-52B-008 carrier aircraft for the revised Space Shuttle solid rocket booster decelerator subsystem drop test vehicleThe structural integrity of B-52B-008, pylon, and hooks for the drop test missions was determined by theoretical analysis. The results of the analysis and conclusions are presented in this document. The major modification to the drop test vehicle was shortening it about 54 inches, which resulted in the forward hook attach structure being located at the base of the nosecone. The shims that are located in the aft hook structures are increased from two inches to three inches. Airspeed, aerodynamic configuration, and load charts are included.Document ID19840013538Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDoty, L. J.*(Boeing Military Airplane Development Wichita, KS, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 16, 1983Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:170989D500-10379-1NASA-CR-170989Accession Number84N21606Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-35016Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840013538.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Grant A. Ritter and Alfred Bader, copartners, trading as Rex Realty Company, appellees, v. Bernard A. Rooney, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,873.

Action to recover commission on sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Municipal Oourt of Chicago; the Hon. George A. Curran, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed with judgment of *nil capiat.*

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

Loueks, Eckert & Peterson, for appellant; John D. Peterson and Tom Leeming, of counsel.

Van Natta & King, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, appellee, v. Rebecca Heckelman, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,977.

Suit to cancel policy of life insurance and to restrain suit thereon. Interlocutory order restraining suit on policy. Interlocutory appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon.. Charles M. Foell, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 23, 1925.

Kremer, Branand & Hamer, for appellant.

Hoyne, O’Connor *&*Rubinkam, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
EXHIBIT 32 (a)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Enzo Biochem, Inc., and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                          |                                | 
|------------------------- | ------------------------------ | 
|Dated:
 October 14 , 2008 |                               
|                          | By: /s/
 Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
|                          |                                | 
|                          | Elazar
 Rabbani, Ph.D.        
|                          | Chief
 Executive Officer      

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Russell Kirk, et al.,*                     Civil No. 4:18-cv-00371-JEG-HCA, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa on December 28, 2020.                

This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against Russell Kirk, Breaking Gate, LLC, and Ottumwa Northshore, LLC, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendants for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the Defendants to restore impacted areas, perform mitigation, and pay a civil penalty.

                    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to the proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Patrick R. Jacobi, Environmental Defense Section, Denver Place Building, 999 18th Street, Suite 370—South Terrace, Denver, CO 80202, and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Russell Kirk, et al.,*                     DJ #90-5-1-1-21241.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 123 East Walnut Street, Des Moines, IA 50309. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined electronically at                     *http://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*

Cherie Rogers,

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 2020-29039 Filed 12-31-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit31.1          

> 
Certification

 

I, William G. Rankin, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of UQM      Technologies, Inc.:
2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not      contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material      fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances      under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the      period covered by this annual report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and      other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present      in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations      and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in      this annual report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for      the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or      caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the      registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us      by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which      this annual report is being prepared;
b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's      disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and      procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report      based on such evaluation; and
c.
Disclosed in this annual report any change in the      registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred      during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's      fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's      internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over      financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit      committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing      the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in      the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which      are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to      record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves      management or other employees who have a significant role in the      registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
Date:  May 16, 2007
/s/  William G. Rankin  
William G. Rankin  
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Darrell G., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 901]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about October 19, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and menacing in the third degree (two counts), and placed him on probation for a period of nine months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility, including its rejection of appellant’s alibi defense *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Concur—Saxe, J.E, Williams, Buckley, Catterson and Malone, JJ.