alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 507.6 Authority to manufacture. ( a ) Only manufacturers that TIOH has certified and has issued a certificate of authority to may produce heraldic items. ( 1 ) TIOH will issue a certificate of authority to manufacturers who can demonstrate they have the capability to manufacture controlled heraldic items according to Government specifications or purchase descriptions through the certification process.
( 2 ) The certificate of authority to manufacture is applicable only for the individual, firm, or corporation indicated and will be valid for 5 years.
( 3 ) TIOH will assign a hallmark to each certified manufacturer. All controlled heraldic items manufactured for commercial sale will bear the manufacturer's hallmark.
( 4 ) TIOH exclusively uses the “IOH” hallmark for the development of new controlled heraldic items; it is not authorized for use on items for commercial sale.
( b ) A certificate of authority to manufacture may be revoked or suspended under the procedures prescribed in § 507.16.
( c ) A list of certified manufacturers is on the TIOH web page at *https://tioh.army.mil/ .*
### §17b. Separability of 1968 amendment

If any provision of this Act or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the Act and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby, and the provisions of the section of this chapter which is amended by such provision of this Act shall apply to such person or circumstances. Pending proceedings shall not be abated by reason of any provision of this Act but shall be disposed of pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, in effect prior to the effective date of this Act.

(Pub. L. 90–258, §27, Feb. 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 34.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 90–258, Feb. 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 26. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

Effective date of this Act, referred to in text, as one hundred and twenty days after Feb. 19, 1968, see section 28 of Pub. L. 90–258, set out as an Effective Date of 1968 Amendment note under section 2 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Commodity Exchange Act which comprises this chapter.
### §1431b. Distribution of surplus commodities to other United States areas

Notwithstanding any other provision of law those areas under the jurisdiction or administration of the United States are authorized to receive from the Department of Agriculture for distribution on the same basis as domestic distribution in any State, Territory, or possession of the United States, without exchange of funds, such surplus commodities as may be available pursuant to clause (2) of section 612c of this title and section 1431 of this title.

(Pub. L. 85–931, §9, Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1792; Pub. L. 87–703, title II, §204, Sept. 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 611; Pub. L. 89–808, §3(a), Nov. 11, 1966, 80 Stat. 1538.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Agricultural Act of 1949 which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of the 1949 Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1966—Pub. L. 89–808 struck out special authority of the Commodity Credit Corporation for purchase of fats and oils for donation abroad, now included in the general authority provided by section 1721 et seq. of this title.

1962—Pub. L. 87–703 inserted "and in nonprofit school lunch programs" after "needy persons".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

Pub. L. 89–808, §3(a), Nov. 11, 1966, 80 Stat. 1538, provided that the amendment made by section 3(a) is effective Jan. 1, 1967.
#### ECCARDT, Appellant, v. EISENHAUER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 30, 1903.)

Action by Catharine Eccardt against John Eisenhauer.

No opinion. Motion to resettle order granted.
Consent of Independent Auditors
                                
                                
                                
                                
                                
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Unique Mobility, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-23113, 33-24071, 33-34612, 33-35055, 33-34613, 33-41325, 33-64852,
34-47454, 33-81430, and 33-92288) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-61166, 33-63399, 333-01919, and 333-13883) on Form S-3 of Unique
Mobility, Inc. of our report dated January 10, 1997 relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Unique Mobility, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of October 31,
1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended October 31, 1996, which report appears in the October 31, 1996
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unique Mobility, Inc.


                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Denver, Colorado
January 28, 1997
#### Siegfried Pollak et al., Respondents, v. Lake Tibet Estates, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action by a number of grantees of a common grantor of certain real property, to restrain the defendants from violating certain restrictive covenants -contained in the deeds, for a declaration of plaintiffs’ rights under such covenants, and for other relief, all the defendants (except Tibet Lake Estates, Inc. and the defendants Holden) appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 15, 1962 and entered October 23, 1962 in Putnam County, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, triable issues of fact exist which cannot be determined on the basis of the conflicting affidavits submitted by the -parties. We take note of the undesirable, if not improper, practice -disclosed by the record on this appeal. It appears that this action was commenced in October, 1960 and that it first appeared on the Trial Calendar in September, 1961. It was set down for trial at the June 1962 Term, but was not reached. In August, 1962, the motion for summary judgment was made. Thus, the motion was made nearly two years after the inception of the action and less than a month prior to the time it would have been reached for trial. -Such tactics have -prevented the disposition of the action in the regular order. The remedy of summary judgment should be used to expedite, and not to delay, the disposition of actions *(Jordan*v. *Levy,*16 A D 2d 64, 65). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 37.1305 Institution of higher education. An educational institution that: ( a ) Meets the criteria in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001); and
( b ) Is subject to the provisions of OMB Circular A-110, “Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations,” as implemented by the Department of Defense at 32 CFR part 32.
### §13–1. Violations, prohibition against dealings in motion picture box office receipts or onion futures; punishment

(a) No contract for the sale of motion picture box office receipts (or any index, measure, value, or data related to such receipts) or onions for future delivery shall be made on or subject to the rules of any board of trade in the United States. The terms used in this section shall have the same meaning as when used in the Commodity Exchange Act [7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.].

(b) Any person who shall violate the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof be fined not more than $5,000.

(Pub. L. 85–839, §1, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 1013; Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §721(e)(10), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Commodity Exchange Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, 42 Stat. 998, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Commodity Exchange Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–203 inserted "motion picture box office receipts (or any index, measure, value, or data related to such receipts) or" after "sale of".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the later of 360 days after July 21, 2010, or, to the extent a provision of subtitle A (§§711–754) of title VII of Pub. L. 111–203 requires a rulemaking, not less than 60 days after publication of the final rule or regulation implementing such provision of subtitle A, see section 754 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 1a of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 85–839, §2, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 1013, provided that: "This Act [enacting this section] shall take effect thirty days after its enactment [Aug. 28, 1958]."
### §1444e–1. Loans and purchases for 1986 through 1996 crops of corn

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, effective only for each of the 1986 through 1996 crops of feed grains, the Secretary of Agriculture may make available loans and purchases, as provided in this section, to producers on a farm who—

(1) for silage—

(A) cut corn (including mutilated corn) that the producers have produced in such crop year; or

(B) purchase or exchange corn (including mutilated corn) that has been produced in such crop year by another producer (including a producer that is not participating in an acreage limitation or set-aside program for such crop established by the Secretary); and

(2) participate in an acreage limitation or set-aside program for such crop of corn established by the Secretary.

(b) Such loans and purchases may be made on a quantity of corn of the same crop, other than the corn obtained for silage, acquired by the producer equivalent to a quantity determined by multiplying—

(1) the acreage of corn obtained for silage; by

(2) the lower of the farm program payment yield or the actual yield on a field, as determined by the Secretary, that is similar to the field from which such silage was obtained.

(Pub. L. 99–198, title IV, §403, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1406; Pub. L. 101–624, title IV, §403, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3419.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food Security Act of 1985, and not as part of the Agricultural Act of 1949 which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of the 1949 Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–624 substituted "1996" for "1990" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–624 effective beginning with 1991 crop of an agricultural commodity, with provision for prior crops, see section 1171 of Pub. L. 101–624, set out as a note under section 1421 of this title.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Michael C. Coffman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Panhandle RoyaltyCompany (the Company);
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of, theCompany as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and we have:
 a). designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b). evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this annual report based on our evaluation; and  c). disclosed in this annual report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)and 15d-15(f) that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal year thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to theCompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors:
 a). all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information;  b). any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    /s/ Michael C. Coffman  Michael C. Coffman Chief Financial Officer Date: December 17, 2004
(44)
#### § 552.123 Storage of personal weapons other than firearms or handguns.

Privately owned weapons, such as knives, swords, air guns, BB guns, cross bows, pellet guns, bow and arrows, of personnel residing the unit billets will be stored in a separate locked container, within a secured storage area designated for this purpose by the unit commander, in a location other than the unit arms room.
AMENDMENT DATED 6/25/2002 TO PRO NOTE DATED 10/1/01



 Exhibit 10.36 
  
 AMENDMENT 
 This AMENDMENT No. 1, dated as of June 25, 2002, to Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated October 1, 2001 by
Gregory Fischbach (“Payor”) and Acclaim Entertainment, Inc. (“Payee”). The parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 
  
 1.    The first full paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Payor hereby unconditionally promises to pay to the order of the Payee, the principal amount of ONE MILLION SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY
DOLLARS ($1,676,250) together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon. The Payor further agrees to pay interest on such principal amount at the rate Payee is charged from time to time by GMAC Commercial Credit LLC (the “Bank Rate”). All
amounts payable hereunder shall be payable to Payee in United States dollars at such bank account as shall be designated by the Payee in immediately available funds or as otherwise specified to Payor in writing. Payment on this note shall be applied
first to any expenses of collection, then to accrued interest, and thereafter to the outstanding principal balance hereof. The principal amount and accrued interest are due and payable on the earlier of (i) August 31, 2003 and (ii) to the extent of
the proceeds of any “Warrant Share Sale” (as defined below), the third business day following the date upon which Payor sells any or all of the Warrant Shares (a “Warrant Share Sale”).” 
  
 2.    The principal amount and accrued interest due under the Note shall in any event be due and payable on August 31,
2003, and such due date shall not be extended under any circumstances. 
  
 3.    Except as
expressly amended hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the original terms thereof. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Note as of the day and year first above written. 
  
 
	 ACCLAIM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    GREGORY E. FISCHBACH        
 

	  	 	 Title:    Chief Executive Officer
 

 
  
 
	  
	 
	 /s/    JAMES SCOROPOSKI        
 

	 James Scoroposki
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 5, 2019

s0529

Order 

Clerk

June 5, 2019

157762

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157762

COA: 336332

Wayne CC: 16-006549-FC

DERRIN TOREY ABBOTT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of December 4, 2018, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer 

the application for leave to appeal the April 12, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals. 

On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to 

appeal is again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to address whether Offense 

Variable 12 (OV 12), MCL 777.42 was properly scored. In making this determination, 

the Court of Appeals shall consider whether the defendant committed three or more 

felonious criminal acts within 24 hours of the sentencing offense and whether the 

predicate offenses for the defendant’s conviction of conducting a criminal enterprise 

constitute “the sentencing offense” or can be considered as contemporaneous felonious 

criminal acts for the purpose of scoring OV 12. In all other respects, leave to appeal is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be 

reviewed by this Court.
#### § 2003.1 Purpose (Article I).

The Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (hereafter “ISCAP” or “the Panel”) advises and assists the President in the discharge of his constitutional and discretionary authority to protect the national security of the United States.
#### § 37.800 Which administrative matters are covered in this subpart?

This subpart addresses “non-systemic” administrative matters that do not impose organization-wide requirements on a participant's financial management, property management, or purchasing system. Because an organization does not have to redesign its systems to accommodate award-to-award variations in these requirements, a TIA that you award may differ from other TIAs in the non-systemic requirements that it specifies for a given participant, based on the circumstances of the particular research project. To eliminate needless administrative complexity, you should handle some non-systemic requirements, such as the payment method, in a uniform way for the agreement as a whole.
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.216 Failure to appear at a hearing or respond to a scheduling notice. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized by the Secretary concerned, further opportunity for a hearing shall not be made available in the following circumstances to an applicant who has requested a hearing: ( 1 ) When the applicant has been sent a letter containing the month and location of a proposed hearing and fails to make a timely response; or
( 2 ) When the applicant, after being notified by letter of the time and place of the hearing, fails to appear at the appointed time, either in person or by representative, without having made a prior, timely request for a continuation, postponement, or withdrawal.
( b ) In such cases, the applicant shall be deemed to have waived the right to a hearing, and the NDRB shall complete its review of the discharge. Further request for a hearing shall not be granted unless the applicant can demonstrate that the failure to appear or respond was due to circumstances beyond the applicant's control.
#### Henry Jordan v. Lester Levy, Individually and Doing Business as Teddy’ Shanty.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
§ 552.69 Application by companies to solicit on military installations in the United States, its territories, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Before a company may be accredited to solicit on a military installation, the commander must receive a letter of application, signed by the company's president or vice president. It must be understood that a knowing and willful false statement is punishable by fine or imprisonment (18 U.S.C. 1001). The letter of application will— ( a ) Report the States in which the company is qualified and licensed to sell insurance.
( b ) Give the name, complete address, and telephone number of each agent who will solicit on the installation if approval is granted; the State in which licensed; the date of licensing and the expiration date; and a statement of agreement to report all future additions and separations of agents employed for solicitation on the installation.
( c ) List all policies and their form numbers that are to be offered for purchase on the installation. Application will be offered for purchase and that these policies meet the requirements of § 552.67(d). Attest that— ( 1 ) The privilege of soliciting the purchase of life insurance is not currently suspended or withdrawn from the company by any of the military departments.
( 2 ) The privilege of soliciting the purchase of life insurance is not currently suspended or withdrawn by any Armed Forces installations from any of the agents named.
( 3 ) The company and the agent named have proper and currently validated licenses as required by § 552.68.
( 4 ) The company assumes full responsibility for its agents complying with this regulation and with any regulations published by the installation commander.
§ 634.50 Towing and storage. ( a ) Impounded POVs may be towed and stored by either the Services and DLA or a contracted wrecker service depending on availability of towing services and the local commander's preference.
( b ) The installation commander will designate an enclosed area on the installation that can be secured by lock and key for an impound lot to be used by the military or civilian wrecker service. An approved impoundment area belonging to the contracted wrecker service may also be used provided the area assures adequate accountability and security of towed vehicles. One set of keys to the enclosed area will be maintained by the installation law enforcement officer or designated individual.
( c ) Temporary impoundment and towing of POVs for violations of the installation traffic code or involvement in criminal activities will be accomplished under the direct supervision of law enforcement personnel.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—DAIRY