alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the WICOR,
Inc. FORM 10-k for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements and the related footnotes.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      379,971
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     65,923
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         384,668
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       200,770
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,031,332
<COMMON>                                        18,601
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      232,702
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            147,903
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 389,620
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           149,110
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      110,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  98,232
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   43,926
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 350,444
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,031,332
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,021,041
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            28,324
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     927,012
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     955,336
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         65,705
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,222
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  66,927
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        17,404
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,523
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   49,523
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        31,397
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          525
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          49,324
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.66
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.9(a)
AMENDMENT

ROUNDY'S, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN

1.  Article III of the Roundy's, Inc. Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan
("Plan"), adopted by the Board of Directors on December 15, 1998 and executed
on May 26, 1999, is amended by deleting subparagraph (b)(ii) of Section 3.3,
"Integration of Other Benefits and Plan Benefit Computation" and replacing
it with the following language:

(b)(ii)   fifty percent (50%) of such Participant's Primary Social Security
          Amount as calculated by the actuary for the Roundy's, Inc.
          Retirement Plan for purposes of determining such Participant's
          Accrued Monthly Benefit under such Retirement Plan.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 138 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 138

   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Financial 
            Services in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 2023

 Mr. McHenry submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Financial 
            Services in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Financial Services (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $20,370,000 for the One Hundred 
Eighteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $10,185,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2023, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2024; and
            (2) not more than $10,185,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2024, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2025.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          39,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,435
<INVENTORY>                                     51,244
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,670
<PP&E>                                          98,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 406,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,985
<BONDS>                                        275,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,221
<OTHER-SE>                                   (301,551)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   406,997
<SALES>                                        477,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               477,125
<CGS>                                          113,854
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               204,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,870
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
### §1322. Repealed. Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title III, §304, 68 Stat. 902

Section, acts Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §322, 52 Stat. 49; July 3, 1948, ch. 827, title II, §203, 62 Stat. 1255; Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title IV, §409(e), 63 Stat. 1057, related to establishment, referendum, and suspension of farm marketing quotas.
### §6125. Flexible schedules; time-recording devices

Notwithstanding section 6106 of this title, the Office of Personnel Management or any agency may use recording clocks as part of programs under section 6122 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 97–221, §2(a)(2), July 23, 1982, 96 Stat. 229.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-31-1997             JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,563,945               3,654,623
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         13,361,199              13,615,510
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,925,144              17,270,133
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     237,150                 295,481
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    15,687,994              16,974,652
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,925,144              17,270,133
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              227,175               2,428,543
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                         1,041,522               1,276,425
<COMMISSIONS>                                (658,592)               (661,043)
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                (22,382)               (212,319)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   587,723               2,831,606
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maciej Kowalewski, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 291]—

*771Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), rendered April 28, 2004, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years on the conviction of manslaughter in the second degree, to run consecutively with a determinate term of imprisonment of 15 years on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by directing that the term of imprisonment imposed on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree shall run concurrently with the term of imprisonment imposed on the conviction of manslaughter in the second degree; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see *People v Pons,*68 NY2d 264, 267-268 [1986]; *People v Licitra,*47 NY2d 554, 559 [1979]; *People v Coley,*289 AD2d 252 [2001]; *People v Johnson,*205 AD2d 707, 707-708 [1994]; *People v Topsy,*265 AD2d 353, 354 [1999]; *People v James M.,*92 AD2d 594 [1983]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the recording of his call made to the 911 operator immediately after the incident was properly admitted as evidence of consciousness of guilt, which outweighed any alleged prejudice *(see generally People v Yazum,*13 NY2d 302 [1963]; *see People v Aguirre,*248 AD2d 717 [1998]). Moreover, error, if any, in the prosecutor’s questions during cross-examination of the defendant regarding the tape recording did not constitute reversible error warranting a new trial where the court sustained objections to the questions, and promptly instructed the jury to disregard the same *(see People v Gibbs,*59 NY2d 930, 932 [1983]; *People v Misla,*2 AD3d 651, 652 [2003]).

Nor did the court err in refusing to instruct the jury with a specific charge on the mistake of fact defense since the court’s instructions on the elements of manslaughter and weapons possession adequately covered the defense theory *(People v Williams,*81 NY2d 303, 316-317 [1993]; *People v Grimaldi,*6 AD3d 722 [2004]; *People v Storms, 2*AD3d 757 [2003]; *People v Banks,*248 AD2d 183 [1998]).

We agree with the defendant, however, that concurrent sentences, rather than consecutive sentences, were mandated under *772the circumstances of this case *(see*Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; *People v Hamilton,*4 NY3d 654, 658 [2005]; *People v Day,*73 NY2d 208, 212 [1989]; *People v Ivory,*27 AD3d 664 [2006]; *People v Reyes,*239 AD2d 524, 525 [1997]; *People v Banks,*208 AD2d 759, 760 [1994]). Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Angiolillo and Balkin, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Vincent Vingo.

Motion to reinstate appeal denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
### §1123. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–331, §10, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1278

Section, act Aug. 8, 1947, ch. 519, title II, §213, as added July 13, 1962, Pub. L. 87–535, §12, 76 Stat, 163; amended July 19, 1962, Pub. L. 87–539, §2(e), 76 Stat. 170, made provision for import fees and set the amount and basis for such fees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1965, pursuant to section 14 of Pub. L. 89–331.
#### BECK et al., Respondents, v. KERR, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 20, 1903.)

Action by Henry Beck, Patrick O’Reilly, and Owen Reilly, as trustees of School District No. 3 of the city of Kingston, N. Y., against George A. Kerr.

No opinion. Motion denied, without costs.
§ 2001.35 Discretionary declassification. ( a ) In accordance with section 3.1(d) of the Order, agencies may declassify information when the public interest in disclosure outweighs the need for continued classification.
( b ) Agencies may also establish a discretionary declassification program that is separate from their automatic, systematic, and mandatory review programs.
§ 37.215 What must I conclude about the recipient's commitment and cost sharing? ( a ) You should judge that the recipient has a strong commitment to and self-interest in the success of the project. You should find evidence of that commitment and interest in the proposal, in the recipient's management plan, or through other means. A recipient's self-interest might be driven, for example, by a research project's potential for fostering technology to be incorporated into products and processes for the commercial marketplace.
( b ) You must seek cost sharing. The purpose of cost share is to ensure that the recipient incurs real risk that gives it a vested interest in the project's success; the willingness to commit to meaningful cost sharing therefore is one good indicator of a recipient's self-interest. The requirements are that: ( 1 ) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal parties carrying out a research project under a TIA are to provide at least half of the costs of the project. Obtaining this cost sharing, to the maximum extent practicable, is a statutory condition for any TIA under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2371, and is a matter of DoD policy for all other TIAs.
( 2 ) The parties must provide the cost sharing from non-Federal resources that are available to them unless there is specific authority to use other Federal resources for that purpose (*see* § 37.530(f)).
( c ) You may consider whether cost sharing is impracticable in a given case, unless there is a non-waivable, statutory requirement for cost sharing that applies to the particular program under which the award is to be made. Before deciding that cost sharing is impracticable, you should carefully consider whether there are other factors that demonstrate the recipient's self-interest in the success of the current project.
Exhibit23.1

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

 

 

 

Wehave issued our reports dated May 10, 2007, accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements and management's assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal controls over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of UQMTechnologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports inthe Registration Statements of UQM Technologies, Inc. on Forms S-8 (FileNo. 033-34612, File No. 033-81430, File No. 033-92288, File No.333-101371, File No. 333-129241, and File No. 333-129251), and Forms S-3(File No. 033-61166, File No. 333-50393 and File No. 333-126946).

 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

 

 

 

Denver, Colorado

May 10, 2007
### SUBCHAPTER I—TENANT PURCHASE LOANS AND MORTGAGE INSURANCE

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1946—Act Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 964, §5, 60 Stat. 1072, amended subchapter heading to read as now set out.
§ 269.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Department.* The Department of Defense.
( b ) *Civil monetary penalty.* Any penalty, fine, or other sanction that: ( 1 ) ( i ) Is for a specific monetary amount as provided by Federal law; or
( ii ) Has a maximum amount provided by Federal law; and
( 2 ) Is assessed or enforced by the Department pursuant to Federal law; and
( 3 ) Is assessed or enforced pursuant to an administrative proceeding or a civil action in the Federal Courts.
( c ) *Consumer Price Index.* The index for all urban consumers published by the Department of Labor.
[61 FR 67945, Dec. 26, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 33391, May 26, 2016]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stanley Weeks, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant: (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 26, 3959, convicting him, after a jury trial, on two counts of forgery in the second degree, and sentencing him (after the filing by the District Attorney of an information charging defendant with two prior felony convictions) to serve a term of 5 to 7% years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently; and (2) from every intermediate order. Judgment affirmed. Although some of the comments of the prosecutor were improper, it is our opinion that the verdict was not influenced thereby and that reversal is not required, in view of the fact that defendant’s guilt was clearly established. (Code Crim. Pro., § 542; ef. *People*v. *Maimone,*9 A D 2d 780, affd. 7 N Y 2d 998.) No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 21
 SYBASE, INC. SUBSIDIARIES
(AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009)
 COMPANY NAME
    
    JURISDICTION OF FORMATIONSybase Argentina, S.A.
    
    ArgentinaSybase Australia Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaSybase BVBA/SPRL
    
    BelgiumSybase Brasil Software Limitada
    
    BrazilSybase 365 Ltd.
    
    British Virgin IslandsSybase Canada Limited
    
    CanadaiAnywhere Solutions Canada Limited
    
    CanadaSybase Software (China) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaRuan Lian Technologies (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (WFOE)
    
    ChinaBeijing Zhang Zhong Hu Dong Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaSybase ApS
    
    DenmarkSybase France S.a.r.l.
    
    FranceSybase GmbH
    
    GermanySybase Hong Kong Limited
    
    Hong KongSybase 365 Limited
    
    Hong KongSybase Software (India) Private Limited
    
    IndiaPT Sybase 365 Indonesia
    
    IndonesiaSybase Italia S.r.l.  Società a Socio Unico
    
    ItalyiAnywhere Solutions K.K.
    
    JapanSybase KK
    
    JapanSybase Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
    
    LuxembourgSybase Software (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
    
    MalaysiaSybase de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoSybase Europe B.V.
    
    NetherlandsSybase Nederland B.V.
    
    NetherlandsChristie Partners Holding C.V.
    
    NetherlandsJoe D Partners CV
    
    NetherlandsSybase (N.Z.) Limited
    
    New ZealandSybase Norge AS
    
    NorwaySybase Philippines Inc.
    
    PhilippinesSybase (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
    
    SingaporeMicawber 447 (Pty) Ltd trading as Sybase 365
    
    South AfricaSybase Korea, Ltd.
    
    South KoreaSybase Iberia S.L.
    
    SpainSybase Sverige AB
    
    SwedenSybase (Schweiz) GmbH
    
    SwitzerlandSybase Taiwan Co., Ltd.
    
    TaiwanSybase (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomOasis Group Pension Trustees Limited
    
    United KingdomSybase 365 Limited
    
    United KingdomSybase International Holdings Corporation, LLC
    
    United StatesiAnywhere Solutions, Inc.
    
    United StatesFinancial Fusion, Inc.
    
    United StatesSybase Global, LLC
    
    United StatesSybase, Inc.
    
    United StatesSybase India, Ltd.
    
    United StatesSybase 365, LLC
    
    United StatesExtended Systems, Incorporated
    
    United States
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(i)


                                   SCHEDULE II



         Ferro Corporation has entered into an executive employment agreement
with James F. Kirsch (Exhibit 10(f)).

         The Company has entered into change in control agreements substantially
identical with its form of change in control agreement (Exhibit 10(h)) with the
following current executive officers:

                                  James C. Bays
                                Thomas M. Gannon
                                 Ann E. Killian
                                 James F. Kirsch
                                Celeste B. Mastin
                                Michael J. Murry
                                 Peter T. Thomas

         Ferro Corporation had entered into an executive employment agreement
with Hector R. Ortino which was substantially identical in all material respects
to the Form of Employment Contract (Exhibit 10(g)), except the lump sum
severance payment for Mr. Ortino was equal to a full year's compensation (base
salary and incentive compensation) multiplied by three.

         The Company had entered into change in control agreements with the
following former executive officers where agreements have since terminated:

                                 M. Craig Benson
                                 Dale G. Kramer
                                Robert W. Martel
                               Millicent W. Pitts