alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 176.25 HUD's negotiations and consultations with the LRA.

HUD may negotiate and consult with the LRA before and during the course of preparation of the LRA's application and during HUD's review thereof with a view toward avoiding any preliminary determination that the application does not meet any requirement of this part. LRAs are encouraged to contact HUD for a list of persons and organizations that are representatives of the homeless operating in the vicinity of the installation.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApproaches to optimization of SS/TDMA time slot assignmentReduction techniques for traffic matrices are explored in some detail. These matrices arise in satellite switched time-division multiple access (SS/TDMA) techniques whereby switching of uplink and downlink beams is required to facilitate interconnectivity of beam zones. A traffic matrix is given to represent that traffic to be transmitted from n uplink beams to n downlink beams within a TDMA frame typically of 1 ms duration. The frame is divided into segments of time and during each segment a portion of the traffic is represented by a switching mode. This time slot assignment is characterized by a mode matrix in which there is not more than a single non-zero entry on each line (row or column) of the matrix. Investigation is confined to decomposition of an n x n traffic matrix by mode matrices with a requirement that the decomposition be 100 percent efficient or, equivalently, that the line(s) in the original traffic matrix whose sum is maximal (called critical line(s)) remain maximal as mode matrices are subtracted throughout the decomposition process. A method of decomposition of an n x n traffic matrix by mode matrices results in a number of steps that is bounded by n(2) - 2n + 2. It is shown that this upper bound exists for an n x n matrix wherein all the lines are maximal (called a quasi doubly stochastic (QDS) matrix) or for an n x n matrix that is completely arbitrary. That is, the fact that no method can exist with a lower upper bound is shown for both QDS and arbitrary matrices, in an elementary and straightforward manner.Document ID19840008175Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsWade, T. O.*(Analex Corp. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategorySpace Communications, Spacecraft Communications, Command And TrackingReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-168328NAS 1.26:168328Meeting InformationMeeting: Commun. Satellite Systems Conf.Location: Orlando, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: March 18, 1984End Date: March 22, 1984Sponsors:AIAAAccession Number84N16243Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-23293Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840008175.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### DARDEN v. HARRELL

No. 500P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 553

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Duckwall-Alco Stores, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and will be retained by Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  September 26, 2011


By: ____/s/ Richard E. Wilson___________


Richard E. Wilson


President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

EAGLEPICHER HOLDINGS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EaglePicher Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas
R. Pilholski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|                                           |  |                      
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|/s/ Thomas R. Pilholski                    |  | Date: October 9, 2003
|                                           |  |                      
|Thomas R. Pilholski, Senior Vice President |  |                      
|and Chief Financial Officer                |  |                      

5
§ 2004.26 Reviews of entity NISP implementation. ( a ) The responsible CSA conducts recurring oversight reviews of entities' NISP security programs to verify that the entity is protecting classified information and is implementing the provisions of the NISPOM (or equivalent). The CSA determines the scope and frequency of reviews. The CSA generally notifies entities when a review will take place, but may also conduct unannounced reviews at its discretion.
( b ) CSAs make every effort to avoid unnecessarily intruding into entity employee personal effects during the reviews.
( c ) A CSA may, on entity premises, physically examine the interior spaces of containers not authorized to store classified information in the presence of the entity's representative.
( d ) As part of a security review, the CSA: ( 1 ) Verifies that the entity limits entity employees with access to classified information to the minimum number necessary to perform on contracts requiring access to classified information.
( 2 ) Validates that the entity has not provided its employees unauthorized access to classified information;
( 3 ) Reviews the entity's self-inspection program and evaluates and records the entity's remedial actions; and
( 4 ) Verifies that the GCA approved any public release of information pertaining to a contract requiring access to classified information.
( e ) As a result of findings during the security review, the CSA may, as appropriate, notify: ( 1 ) GCAs if there are unfavorable results from the review; and
( 2 ) A prime entity if the CSA discovers unsatisfactory security conditions pertaining to a sub-entity.
( f ) The CSA maintains a record of reviews it conducts and the results. Based on review results, the responsible CSA determines whether an entity's eligibility for access to classified information may continue. See § 2004.32(g).
§ 552.66 Actions required by agents. ( a ) The agent must know that— ( 1 ) Soldiers to be solicited are in grades E-1, E-2, or E-3, and
( 2 ) The solicitation of these members is restricted to specified times and locations designated by the installation commander.
( b ) Agents must leave information on the policy applied for with each member in grades E-1, E-2, and E-3 who applies for insurance and the unit insurance officer or counselor. Agents must complete DA Form 2056 (Commercial Insurance Solicitation Record). Blank DA Forms 2056 (not allotment forms) will be available to insurance agents on request. In the “Remarks” section of DA Form 2056, agents will include all pertinent information and a clear statement that dividends are not guaranteed if the presentation refers to dividends.
### §1636a. Unlawful acts

It shall be unlawful and a violation of this subchapter for any packer or other person subject to this subchapter (in the submission of information required under part B, C, or D of this subchapter, as determined by the Secretary) to willfully—

(1) fail or refuse to provide, or delay the timely reporting of, accurate information to the Secretary (including estimated information);

(2) solicit or request that a packer, the buyer or seller of livestock or livestock products, or any other person fail to provide, as a condition of any transaction, accurate or timely information required under this subchapter;

(3) fail or refuse to comply with this subchapter; or

(4) report estimated information in any report required under this subchapter in a manner that demonstrates a pattern of significant variance in accuracy when compared to the actual information that is reported for the same reporting period, or as determined by any audit, oversight, or other verification procedures of the Secretary.

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title II, §252, as added Pub. L. 106–78, title IX, §911(2), Oct. 22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1201.)
Senior Executive Change in Control Agreement referred to in Exhibit 10.14



 Exhibit 10.15 
  
  
 Schedule to Form of Senior Executive Change in
Control Agreement between 
 Ryerson Inc. and the following parties: 
  
  
  
  
 Neil S. Novich 
 Jay M. Gratz 
 Gary J. Niederpruem
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Victorias Milling Co., Inc., and Hugo Neu Corporation.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before May 1, 1962, with notice of argument for the June 1962 Term of this court; said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur—Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
No. 8080.

#### Dickson *v.*Tom et al.

(Decided October 27, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Muskingum county.

*Mr. S. M. Winn*and *Mr. John C. Bassett, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Frank E. Southard,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Shauck and Crew, JJ., concur.
No. 99-40485 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40361 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERTO GUILLEN-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-599-ALL

-------------------- March 10, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto Guillen-Ramirez has filed a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Guillen received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief reveals no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
### **CHAPTER 92—SOYBEAN PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER INFORMATION**

Sec.
6301.
Findings and declaration of policy.
6302.
Definitions.
6303.
Issuance and amendment of orders.
6304.
Required terms in orders.
6305.
Referenda.
6306.
Petition and review.
6307.
Enforcement.
6308.
Investigations and power to subpoena.
6309.
Administrative provisions.
6310.
Suspension or termination of orders.
6311.
Authorization of appropriations; regulations.
#### In the Matter of Amber B., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Orange County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kenneth E., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (And Related Proceedings.)

[832 NYS2d 449]—

In a child protective proceeding and related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Kenneth E. appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Orange County (Kiedaisch, J.), entered June 13, 2005, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that he had sexually abused the child Amber B.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s finding that the appellant sexually abused *744the child Amber B. was supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see Matter of Sanjeeda M.,*24 AD3d 445 [2005]; *Matter of Shavar B.,*7 AD3d 619, 620 [2004]). Contrary to the appellant’s contention, Amber B.’s out-of-court statements were corroborated by several sources, including the validating testimony of the child abuse expert and the testimony of a Department of Social Services caseworker *(see Matter of Nicole V.,*71 NY2d 112, 117-119 [1987]; *Matter of Sanjeeda M., supra; Matter of Shavar B., supra).*Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4553-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of North Dakota (FEMA-4553-DR), dated July 9, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued December 18, 2020.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of North Dakota is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 9, 2020.

Kidder and Wells Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2020-29279 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                         10.3(a)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             ROHN Industries, Inc.

                               6718 W. Plan Road
                                 P.O. Box 2000
                               Peoria, IL  61656
                                 July 24, 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


By Hand Delivery
----------------

Mr. David V. LaRusso
12511 Triple Oaks Drive
St. Louis, MO  63128

Dear Dave:

     This letter is to confirm the conversation that we had today pertaining to
compensation issues.

     I have agreed with the Chairman of the Compensation Committee not to
request an increase in the base salary for any of the Executive Officers of the
Company, including myself, until on or after January 1, 2001.  The opportunity
for increased earnings until January 1, 2001, will relate to our combined and
individual performances under the bonus plan, which as you know was modified in
March of this year to provide you with greater bonus earnings potential.

     In consideration of the above, and your continued service to the Company, I
am pleased to extend to you an additional term of your employment with ROHN
Industries, Inc. ("ROHN").  As you know, your employment is at-will and either
party may terminate the employment relationship at any time for any reason.
However, in the event that your employment were to be terminated by ROHN without
cause during the next three years, you will be entitled to a severance payment
equal to one year's base salary then in effect plus the amount of the target
bonus for the year in which termination occurred.  In the event you are
terminated for cause at any time, no severance or termination payment shall be
made. The term "cause" as used herein shall mean an act or acts of dishonesty in
the course of employment, the conviction of a felony or the failure to perform
duties or responsibilities reasonably assigned by me or the Board of Directors.

     We appreciate all that you do for ROHN and we look forward to your
continued service.

                                Very truly yours,


                                /s/ Brian B. Pemberton
                                ----------------------
                                Brian B. Pemberton
                                President & CEO

BP/tk1419
§ 274.2 Definitions. ( a ) The terms *public notice, notices,* or *announcement* mean the public notice of invitation to bid and any supplementary or amendatory notices or announcements with respect thereto, including, but not limited to, any statement released to the press by the Secretary of Defense or his designee and notices sent to those who have filed notices of intent to bid or who have filed bids.
( b ) The term *Loan Agreement* means the proposed agreement between the foreign government and the private U.S. lender as described in the particular notice of Invitation to Bid.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                DSC COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     Computation of Income (Loss) per Share
                                 (In thousands)



The following table sets forth the computation of shares used in the
calculation of income (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994.


Average Shares Used in Income (Loss) per Share Calculation:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   1996                             1995                     1994
                                         ------------------------       ------------------------      ---------------------
                                                         Fully                           Fully                       Fully
                                         Primary       Diluted(B)       Primary        Diluted(B)     Primary      Diluted(B)
                                         -------        -------         -------         -------       -------       -------
 <S>                                    <C>              <C>            <C>             <C>          <C>            <C>
 Weighted average
  shares outstanding
  during the year................        116,514           --           114,681            --         112,254          --
 Common share equivalents
  outstanding:
  Options and warrants
    issued and
    contingently issuable........           --  (A)        --             5,271            --           6,104          --
  Assumed purchase of
    treasury shares..............           --  (A)        --            (1,826)           --          (1,469)         --
                                         -------        -------         -------         -------       -------       -------
 Weighted average shares
  used in calculation............        116,514           --           118,126            --         116,889          --
                                         =======        =======         =======         =======       =======       =======
</TABLE>



(A) Common stock equivalents are not included in the income (loss) per share
    calculation in a period in which a net loss is incurred since their
    inclusion would be antidilutive.

(B) Fully diluted income (loss) per share is not shown since the dilutive
    effect is less than three percent.