alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 37.515 Must I do anything additional to determine the qualification of a consortium? ( a ) When the prospective recipient of a TIA is a consortium that is not formally incorporated, your determination that the recipient meets the standard at 32 CFR 22.415(a) requires that you, in consultation with legal counsel, review the management plan in the consortium's collaboration agreement. The purpose of your review is to ensure that the management plan is sound and that it adequately addresses the elements necessary for an effective working relationship among the consortium members. An effective working relationship is essential to increase the research project's chances of success.
( b ) The collaboration agreement, commonly referred to as the articles of collaboration, is the document that sets out the rights and responsibilities of each consortium member. It binds the individual consortium members together, whereas the TIA binds the Government and the consortium as a group (or the Government and a consortium member on behalf of the consortium, as explained in § 37.1015). The document should discuss, among other things, the consortium's: ( 1 ) Management structure.
( 2 ) Method of making payments to consortium members.
( 3 ) Means of ensuring and overseeing members' efforts on the project.
( 4 ) Provisions for members' cost sharing contributions.
( 5 ) Provisions for ownership and rights in intellectual property developed previously or under the agreement.
### **CHAPTER 110—ENHANCING CONTROLS ON DANGEROUS BIOLOGICAL AGENTS AND TOXINS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Sec.
8401.
Regulation of certain biological agents and toxins.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—INTERAGENCY COORDINATION REGARDING OVERLAP AGENTS AND TOXINS

8411.
Interagency coordination.
Exhibit 31.3
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, David C. Swanson, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of R.H.Donnelley Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls or procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b.) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation;  c.) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5 The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming equivalent functions):
 a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 7, 2004 By: /s/ David C. Swanson       David C. Swanson   President and Chief Executive Officer
64
#### Eugene A. Kleila, Respondent-Appellant, v. Eugene T. Kleila et al., Appellants-Respondents.

In an action by one alleged partner against the other and a corporation alleged to be partnership property, to compel the return of books and records, to recover moneys due to plaintiff from the individual defendant, and for other relief, the parties cross-appeal as follows from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 11, 1963: (1) Defendants appeal from so much of said order: (a) as granted plaintiff’s motion for discovery and inspection of the books and records, etc., of certain named partnerships; for the return thereof to the partnership office; and for an injunction against their removal therefrom; and (b) as denied their cross motion to dismiss the complaint for patent insufficiency. (2) Plaintiff appeals from so much of said order as denied his motion to inspect the books, records and papers of the corporate defendant. Order modified by striking out its fourth decretal paragraph denying plaintiff’s motion to inspect the corporate defendant’s books, records and papers, and by including the name of the corporate defendant in the first and third decretal paragraphs, which granted such inspection with respect to certain partnerships named therein. As so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to plaintiff against the individual defendant. Defendants’ time to answer the complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Defendants’ time to comply with the terms of the order appealed from (as modified and affirmed), with respect to the return of the books and records, etc., specified therein, is extended until 10 days after entry of the order hereon. The discovery and inspection pursuant to the order appealed from (as modified and affirmed) shall proceed on 10 days’ written notice or at such other time and place as the parties may mutually stipulate in writing. Inspection of the books and records of the corporate defendant is, in our opinion, material in determining the ownership of partnership property, including that of the corporate defendant, as opposed to the property exclusively owned by the individual defendant. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### HAIGHT, Respondent, v. STOCK, GRAIN & PROVISION CO. OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by William C. Haight against the Stock, Grain & Provision Company of New York. J.

Delahunty, for appellant. W. P. Maloney, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,740
<PP&E>                                          53,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,092
<BONDS>                                         30,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           874
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,728
<SALES>                                        143,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,600
<CGS>                                          138,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,850)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,355)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,495)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,362
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,133)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)


</TABLE>
#### Albert Eidelberg, Appellant, v. George Newman et al., Respondents.

Motion by appellant to dispense with the printing of the appeal records, briefs and opinions, in two prior terminated actions, which are on file in this court and in the Appellate Division, First Department, granted. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 251 (Thursday, December 31, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 86903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28976]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2109]


Production Authority Not Approved, Foreign-Trade Zone 8, Arbor 
Foods Inc. (Blended Syrup), Toledo, Ohio

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority, grantee of FTZ 8, 
has requested production authority on behalf of Arbor Foods Inc. 
(Arbor), within FTZ 8 in Toledo, Ohio (B-63-2019, docketed October 10, 
2019);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (84 FR 55549, October 17, 2019) and the application 
has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the finding and recommendation of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations have not been satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby does not approve the application 
requesting production authority under zone procedures within FTZ 8 for 
Arbor, as described in the application and Federal Register notice.

    Dated: December 28, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2020-28976 Filed 12-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### McLAURIN, Respondent, v. CUBA CO., Appellant (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Actions by Peter F. McLaurin against the Cuba Company.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, without costs.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 4 (Thursday, January 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1119-1120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00036]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities


Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities; National 
Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given that the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities 
will hold a meeting of the Arts and Artifacts Domestic Indemnity Panel.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 17, 2021, from 
12:00 p.m. until adjourned.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held by videoconference originating at 
the National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Voyatzis, Committee 
Management Officer, 400 7th Street SW, Room 4060, Washington, DC 20506, 
(202) 606-8322; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc998a93859d8886958fbc929994d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7a2b1a8bea6b3bdaeb487a9a2afe9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is for panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for 
Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts 
and the Humanities, for exhibitions beginning on or after April 1, 
2021. Because the meeting will consider proprietary financial and 
commercial data provided in confidence by indemnity applicants, and 
material that is likely to disclose trade secrets or other privileged 
or confidential information, and because it is important to keep the 
values of objects to be indemnified and the methods of transportation 
and security measures confidential, I have determined that that the 
meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4) of 
section 552b of Title 5, United States Code. I have made this 
determination under the authority granted me by the Chairman's

[[Page 1120]]

Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee Meetings, dated 
April 15, 2016.

    Dated: January 4, 2021.
Caitlin Cater,
Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2021-00036 Filed 1-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          41,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,751,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (136,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,925,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,395,350
<PP&E>                                       2,700,738
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,404,488)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,777,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,176,090
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       189,970
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,986,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,777,113
<SALES>                                     12,849,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,849,145
<CGS>                                       10,512,665
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,512,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,179,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             347,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (191,391)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (191,391)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (191,391)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.18)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the ‘‘Company’’) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), the undersigned, Doron Birger, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2008





/s/ Doron BirgerDoron BirgerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)


---
§ 1907.25 Action on appeal of initial Agency determination. ( a ) The challenger may, within 45 calendar days of receiving notice of a denial of the challenge, appeal the denial to the ARP by sending the appeal and any supplementary information in support of the challenge to the Executive Secretary of the ARP (ES/ARP).
( b ) Within 10 business days of receipt of an appeal, the ES/ARP will record receipt, provide the challenger with written acknowledgement, and forward the appeal to C/CMCG, the appropriate IMTOs, originator, and other appropriate parties, who shall review the appeal and related materials, and within 30 business days provide a written recommendation to the ARP.
( c ) The ARP shall meet on a regular schedule and may take action when a simple majority of the total membership is present. Issues shall be decided by a majority of the members present. In all cases of a divided vote, before the decision of the ARP becomes final, any member of the ARP may by written memorandum to the ES/ARP, refer such matters to the Director, Information Management Services (D/IMS) for decision. In the event of a disagreement with any decision by D/IMS related to the classification challenge, Directorate heads may appeal to the Associate Deputy Director, CIA (ADD) for resolution. The final Agency decision shall reflect the vote of the ARP, unless changed by the D/IMS or the ADD.
( d ) The ES/ARP shall promptly provide the challenger with written notice of the final Agency decision and, if the appeal is denied, inform the challenger of the right to appeal to the ISCAP through C/CMCG, who will forward the appeal to the ISCAP.
[76 FR 59032, Sept. 23, 2011]
##### 



EXHIBIT 3(a)
 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of
Eaton Corporation
As Adopted by the Shareholders at the Annual Meeting
Held on April 23, 2008




---



##### 



-2-




---



##### 



Serial Preferred Shares
 Common Shares
   Issuance in Series
    -3-




---



##### 



Dividend Rights
    -4-




---



##### 



Dividends and Acquisitions of Shares
   Redemption
  -5-




---



##### 



Rights Upon Liquidation
   -6-




---



##### 



Voting Rights
   -7-




---



##### 



-8-




---



##### 



-9-




---



##### 



Dividend Rights
 Distribution of Assets
 Voting Power
    -10-




---



##### 



-11-




---



##### 



-12-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN IT'S ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                       102
<INVENTORY>                                     14,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,532
<PP&E>                                          60,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,273
<BONDS>                                         18,932
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           797
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,815
<SALES>                                         15,757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,757
<CGS>                                           14,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (24)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 471
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,769)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (817)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,952)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>