alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,430
<SECURITIES>                                       117
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (120)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,183
<PP&E>                                          70,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,684)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,322
<BONDS>                                         59,242
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           29,515
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,356
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,552)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,883
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,828
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (14,046)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (6,521)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (459)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,810)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    440
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,568)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.99)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.99)
<FN>
<F1>Common shares of beneficial interest equivalents were anti-dilutive. The EPS
figures presented above include the effects of stock dividends, discounts and
accretion of discounts on redeemable convertible preferred stock.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §1031. Conveyance of mineral rights with land

Any conveyance of real estate by the Government or any Government agency under this Act shall include all mineral rights.

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 964, §9, 60 Stat. 1080.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 964, 60 Stat. 1062, known as the Farmers' Home Administration Act of 1946. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Farmers' Home Administration Act of 1946, and not as part of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act which constitutes a major part of this chapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
July 1, 2015

Mr. Cody Perry

P.O. Box 774000 PMB 216

Steamboat Springs, CO 80477

Dear Mr. Perry:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request, posted to the public docket on April 27, 2015, into the 

public docket (No. FAA−2015−1216), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
1PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLISTFOR SAFE OPERATION OF UAVs• Preplan fl ight path and confi rm any nearby restrictedfl ight areas.• Obtain necessary permissions from relevant propertyholders• Confi rm weather/wind conditions are acceptable for safefl ight• Transmitter fi rmware up to date• UAV fi rmware up to date• Inspect UAV for obvious defects / loose screws• Batteries fully charged• Propellors tightened and/or locked• ND fi lter needed? Yes/No• SD card in camera, SD card formatted if needed• Monitor brightness set to high & hood installed• Transmitter antenna up• Transmitter turned on• UAV turned on• Compass calibrated• Confi rm strong GPS/Transmitter connection signal• Confi rm “Safe to Fly GPS” notifi cation in app• Maximum altitude and fl ight boundary restrictionsconfi gured• Minimum return height adjusted for tallest obstruction• Auto-return home set for 20% battery power• UAV placed in safe launch and recover position• Area clear of peoplecontinued...2FLIGHT• Warn bystanders of imminent takeoff• Hover close for 20 seconds. Look/listen for defects• Confi rm expected controls operation• Monitor battery power and return home when batterynears 20%• Keep line of sight with UAV• Monitor signal strengthFLY SAFE, FLY SMART, DON’T TAKE RISKS!!!!
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Walter Dmytreshin, Respondent. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.

The Industrial Commissioner appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, holding, contrary to the initial determination of the Commissioner, that claimant had worked in a covered employment in New York and was qualified for benefits. Claimant was employed by the New York office of the employer as a “ layout ” man. The employer was engaged in a nationwide business of designing, redesigning and planning machine layouts for any concern that engaged its services anywhere in the United States. Claimant was not hired for any particular job, but was hired generally to perform services for the employer anywhere he was assigned. It so happened that his first assignment was to a plant in New Jersey, and it so happened that his employment ended before he was assigned elsewhere. If his employment during the period he worked for the employer can be considered a New York employment he is entitled to benefits. Claimant was not only hired in New York for general service anywhere, but all written instructions for the work in New Jersey emanated from the New York office of the employer, and claimant and his group were in almost constant touch with the New York office of the employer by telephone for instructions. Claimant had to go to the New York office of the employer on occasions for written plans and instructions. Appellant contends that claimant’s work was “localized” in the State of New Jersey, and that the services “if any” performed in New York were “incidental” to those performed in New Jersey. We do not agree with appellant’s contention that, in order to uphold the decision appealed from, we must find, as a matter of law, the converse of his contention. The Referee and the Appeals Board have found the converse as a question of fact and have applied subdivision 3 of section 511 of the Labor Law covering “Work within and without the state”. We think the record justifies such a finding on the facts that claimant’s service is not localized in any State, some of the service is performed in this State, claimant’s base of operations is in this State, and his service was directed and controlled from this State. It is interesting to note that, under an almost identical statute, it has been held in New Jersey that claimant did not have a covered employment there and was ineligible for benefits. The main contention of appellant seems *675to be that because claimant actually worked only on one job in New Jersey before his employment terminated, the board must be controlled by that factor alone. We do not think that the fortuitous circumstance that his employment ended before he was sent elsewhere is controlling. This was an unusual type of employment emanating from New York for service expected to be in numerous localities, or so the board could find, and the record affords adequate basis for the decision of the Referee and the Appeals Board. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdvanced air revitalization system testingA previously developed experimental air revitalization system was tested cyclically and parametrically. One-button startup without manual interventions; extension by 1350 hours of tests with the system; capability for varying process air carbon dioxide partial pressure and humidity and coolant source for simulation of realistic space vehicle interfaces; dynamic system performance response on the interaction of the electrochemical depolarized carbon dioxide concentrator, the Sabatier carbon dioxide reduction subsystem, and the static feed water electrolysis oxygen generation subsystem, the carbon dioxide concentrator module with unitized core technology for the liquid cooled cell; and a preliminary design for a regenerative air revitalization system for the space station are discussed.Document ID19840009787Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHeppner, D. B.*(Life Systems, Inc. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Hallick, T. M.*(Life Systems, Inc. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Schubert, F. H.*(Life Systems, Inc. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1983Subject CategoryMan/System Technology And Life SupportReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-166540NAS 1.26:166540LSI-TR-406-4Accession Number84N17855Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-10961PROJECT: RTOP 506-64-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840009787.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
** 
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of UQM Technologies, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ William G. Rankin
William G. Rankin
Chairman, President and    Chief Executive Officer
 

/s/ Donald A. French
Donald A. French
Treasurer, Secretary and    Chief Financial Officer
 
Date:  May 25, 2005

 **
# C_2008008EN.01003001.xml

| 12.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/30

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 November 2007 — Michail v Commission

(Case F-67/05) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Evaluation - Career evaluation report - 2003 evaluation period - Action for annulment - Action for damages)

(2008/C 8/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Christos Michail (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Meïdanis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agent, assisted by E. Bourtzalas, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

On the one hand, an application for the annulment of the applicant's career evaluation report for the evaluation period from 1 April 2003 to 31 December 2003 and, on the other, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls Mr Michail's career evaluation report for the evaluation period from 1 April 2003 to 31 December 2003; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Mr Michail's career evaluation report for the evaluation period from 1 April 2003 to 31 December 2003;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 229 of 17.9.2005, p. 33 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities as Case T-284/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
§ 37.1045 To whom must I send copies of the award document? You must send a copy of the award document to the: ( a ) Recipient. You must include on the first page of the recipient's copy a prominent notice about the current DoD requirements for payment by electronic funds transfer (EFT).
( b ) Office you designate to administer the TIA. You are strongly encouraged to delegate post-award administration to the regional office of the Defense Contract Management Agency or Office of Naval Research that administers awards to the recipient. When delegating, you should clearly indicate on the cover sheet or first page of the award document that the award is a TIA, to help the post-award administrator distinguish it from other types of assistance instruments.
( c ) Finance and accounting office designated to make the payments to the recipient.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                 CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this
Quarterly Report of EDO Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ JAMES M. SMITH
                                  ---------------------------
                                  James M. Smith
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  July 30, 2004

                                  /s/ FREDERIC B. BASSETT
                                  ---------------------------
                                  Frederic B. Bassett
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  July 30, 2004
§ 220.7 Remedies and procedures. ( a ) Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1095(e)(1), the United States may institute and prosecute legal proceedings against a third party payer to enforce a right of the United States under 10 U.S.C. 1095 and this part.
( b ) Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1095(e)(2), an authorized representative of the United States may compromise, settle or waive a claim of the United States under 10 U.S.C. 1095 and this part.
( c ) The authorities provided by 31 U.S.C. 3701, *et seq.,* 28 CFR part 11, and 4 CFR parts 101-104 regarding collection of indebtedness due the United States shall be available to effect collections pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1095 and this part.
( d ) A third party payer may not, without the consent of a U.S. Government official authorized to take action under 10 U.S.C. 1095 and this part, offset or reduce any payment due under 10 U.S.C. 1095 or this part on the grounds that the payer considers itself due a refund from a facility of the Uniformed Services. A request for refund must be submitted and adjudicated separately from any other claims submitted to the third party payer under 10 U.S.C. 1095 or this part.
[55 FR 21748, May 29, 1990, as amended at 65 FR 7728, Feb. 16, 2000]
Exhibit 12 (b)

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                       AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DIVIDENDS

                          (in thousands, except ratios)

                                                       For the Nine Months Ended
                                                           September 30, 2004
                                                              (unaudited)
                                                       -------------------------
Net income                                                           $ 17,154
                                                                       ======
Fixed charges:
      Audit fees                                                           39
      Trustee fees                                                         93
      Administrative and consulting fees                                  907
                                                                       ------
Total fixed charges                                                     1,039
                                                                       ------
Earnings before fixed charges                                        $ 18,193

Fixed charges, as above                                                 1,039
                                                                       ------
Preferred securities dividend                                          19,345
                                                                      -------
Fixed charges including preferred securities dividends               $ 20,384
                                                                      -------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
  securities dividend                                                     .89
                                                                      -------
### §1534. Cybercrime

Subject to the availability of appropriations, and in accordance with the comparable level of the General Schedule, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide incentive pay, in an amount that is not more than 25 percent of the basic pay of the individual, to an individual appointed to a position in the Department of Justice (including the Federal Bureau of Investigation) or the Department of Homeland Security (including positions in Homeland Security Investigations), respectively, requiring significant cyber skills, including to aid in—

(1) the protection of trafficking victims;

(2) the prevention of trafficking in persons; or

(3) the prosecution of technology-facilitated crimes against children by buyers or traffickers in persons.

(Pub. L. 117–347, title IV, §401, Jan. 5, 2023, 136 Stat. 6207.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Schedule, referred to in text, is set out under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Abolish Trafficking Reauthorization Act of 2022, and not as part of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 which comprises this chapter.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 0995 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 -NM - 243 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**