alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1207. Pipeline security inspections and enforcement

#### (a) In general

Not later than 9 months after August 3, 2007, consistent with the Annex to the Memorandum of Understanding executed on August 9, 2006, between the Department of Transportation and the Department, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, shall establish a program for reviewing pipeline operator adoption of recommendations of the September 5, 2002, Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration's Pipeline Security Information Circular, including the review of pipeline security plans and critical facility inspections.

#### (b) Review and inspection

Not later than 12 months after August 3, 2007, the Secretary and the Secretary of Transportation shall develop and implement a plan for reviewing the pipeline security plans and an inspection of the critical facilities of the 100 most critical pipeline operators covered by the September 5, 2002, circular, where such facilities have not been inspected for security purposes since September 5, 2002, by either the Department or the Department of Transportation.

#### (c) Compliance review methodology

In reviewing pipeline operator compliance under subsections (a) and (b), risk assessment methodologies shall be used to prioritize risks and to target inspection and enforcement actions to the highest risk pipeline assets.

#### (d) Regulations

Not later than 18 months after August 3, 2007, the Secretary and the Secretary of Transportation shall develop and transmit to pipeline operators security recommendations for natural gas and hazardous liquid pipelines and pipeline facilities. If the Secretary determines that regulations are appropriate, the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of Transportation on the extent of risk and appropriate mitigation measures, and the Secretary or the Secretary of Transportation, consistent with the Annex to the Memorandum of Understanding executed on August 9, 2006, shall promulgate such regulations and carry out necessary inspection and enforcement actions. Any regulations shall incorporate the guidance provided to pipeline operators by the September 5, 2002, Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration's Pipeline Security Information Circular and contain additional requirements as necessary based upon the results of the inspections performed under subsection (b). The regulations shall include the imposition of civil penalties for noncompliance.

#### (e) Funding

From the amounts appropriated pursuant to section 114(w) 1 of title 49, there shall be made available to the Secretary to carry out this section—

(1) $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;

(2) $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; and

(3) $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2010.

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1557, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 475.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 114(w) of title 49, referred to in subsec. (e)(1), was redesignated section 114(v) of title 49 by Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, §1904(b)(1)(I), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3545.

1 See References in Text note below.
Order filed November 19, 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00398

- CR NO. 14

- 15

- 00399

- CR NO. 14

- 15

- 00400

- CR

____________ SANDRA F. BERRY, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1462961



### ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Randall J. Ayers . Appellant ’ s brief was originally due July 20, 2015

. We have granted a total of 105 days to file appellant ’ s brief until November 2, 2015

. When we granted the last extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional
circumstances. No brief was filed. We notified the parties on November 4, 2015,that if appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file the brief within

10 days, the court would take appropriate action. On November 16 , 2015 , counsel filed a further request for extension of time to file ap pellant ’ s brief. Counsel did not allege any exceptional circumstances in the request.
We deny the request for extension and issue the following order.
Accordingly, we order Randall J. Ayers to file a brief with the clerk of this

c ourt on or before Decembe r 1, 2015 . If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as ordered, the c ourt will issue an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the
brief and the consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Boyce, Jamison, and Busby

.
#### § 1698.5 Basis of advisory opinions.

Advisory opinions will be based on the request therefor, responses to requests for information, and matters of which the Director can take official notice.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

CHRISTOPHER PERKINS

NO. 2023 KW 0352

JULY 5, 2023

In Re: Christopher Perkins, applying for supervisory writs, 

21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, 

No. 703- 176. 

BEFORE: LANIER, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include

the district court' s ruling, the court minutes from the February

16, 2023 hearing, the State' s response, if any, the bill of

information, the uniform commitment order, and any other

portions of the district court' s record that might support the

claims raised in the writ application. Therefore, this court

cannot adequately review the ruling at issue herein. 

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application

for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of

Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event

relator elects to file a new application with this court, he may

do so without the necessity of obtaining a return date. Any

future filing on this issue should include the entire contents

of this application, the missing items noted above, and a

copy

of this ruling. 

WIL

CHH

SMM

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

N

L

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

Q FOR THE COURT
#### In the Matter of Fausta Delbeau, as Administrator of the Estate of Jeannel Delbeau, Deceased, Respondent, v Julius St. Jean, a Financially Irresponsible Motorist, by the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to section 610 of the Insurance Law to compel payment by the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) of a judgment recovered by the petitioner against an alleged uninsured motorist, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 16, 1978, which granted the application. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and matter remanded to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance herewith. In accordance with subdivision (d) of section 611 of the Insurance Law, petitioner was "required to show * * * whether the judgment debtor at the time of the accident was insured”. Special Term erred in holding that MVAIC was estopped from claiming that the judgment debtor did, in fact, have such insurance merely because it had previously opted, pursuant to subdivision (b) of section 609 of the Insurance Law, to undertake the defense of the tort-feasor. Such a finding of estoppel, on these facts, is tantamount to granting to petitioner a judgment against MVAIC, merely because of its unsuccessful defense on behalf of the tort-feasor. This is contrary to the statutory scheme (cf. *Cudahy v MVAIC,*36 AD2d 717). The peculiar facts of *Matter of Eatman v MVAIC*(84 Misc 2d 910) render that decision inapposite. Accordingly, the proceeding must be remanded to Special Term for a determination as to whether the judgment debtor was covered by a policy of automobile insurance on the date of the accident. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                        32,462
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 34,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                  384
<INVENTORY>                                   7,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              77,247
<PP&E>                                        61,374
<DEPRECIATION>                                48,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                107,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         35,225
<BONDS>                                       40,012
<COMMON>                                      8,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   65
<OTHER-SE>                                    17,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  107,839
<SALES>                                       70,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              70,226
<CGS>                                         52,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 64,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              50
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              36
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               5,142
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           4,290
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  4,290
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .60
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                  "EXHIBIT 21"

                               LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


                Subsidiaries of International Bancshares Corporation

<Table>
<Caption>
        Name                         Business                 % of Ownership
        ----                         --------                 --------------
<S>                                  <C>                      <C>
IBC Subsidiary Corporation           Bank Holding Company          100%
IBC Life Insurance Company           Credit Life Insurance         100%
IBC Trading Company                  Export Trading                100%
IBC Capital Corporation              Investments                   100%
IB Capital Trust I                   Capital Securities            100%
IB Capital Trust II                  Capital Securities            100%
IB Capital Trust III                 Capital Securities            100%
IB Capital Trust IV                  Capital Securities            100%
</Table>

                   Subsidiaries of IBC Subsidiary Corporation

<Table>
<Caption>
        Name                         Business                 % of Ownership
        ----                         --------                 --------------
<S>                                  <C>                      <C>
International Bank of Commerce       State Bank                    100%
Commerce Bank                        State Bank                    100%
International Bank of Commerce,
  Zapata                             State Bank                    100%
International Bank of Commerce,
  Brownsville                        State Bank                    100%
Gulfstar Group I, Ltd.               Investment and Merchant
                                       Banking                      70%
Gulfstar Group II, Ltd.              Investment Banking             70%
</Table>
§ 634.33 Training of law enforcement personnel. ( a ) As a minimum, installation law enforcement personnel will be trained to do the following: ( 1 ) Recognize signs of alcohol and other drug impairment in persons operating motor vehicles.
( 2 ) Prepare DD Form 1920 (Alcohol Influence Report).
( 3 ) Perform the three field tests of the improved sobriety testing techniques (§ 634.36 (b)).
( 4 ) Determine when a person appears intoxicated but is actually physically or mentally ill and requires prompt medical attention.
( 5 ) Understand the operation of breath-testing devices.
( b ) Each installation using breath-testing devices will ensure that operators of these devices— ( 1 ) Are chosen for integrity, maturity, and sound judgment.
( 2 ) Meet certification requirements of the State where the installation is located.
( c ) Installations located in States or overseas areas having a formal breath-testing and certification program should ensure operators attend that training.
( d ) Installations located in States or overseas areas with no formal training program will train personnel at courses offered by selected civilian institutions or manufacturers of the equipment.
( e ) Operators must maintain proficiency through refresher training every 18 months or as required by the State.
#### STATE v. DANIELS

No. 553P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 752

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
#### § 246.2 Applicability.

This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments (including their National Guard and Reserve components), the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Unified and Specified Commands, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities (hereafter referred to collectively as “the DoD Components”). The term “the Military Services,” as used herein, refers to the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marine Corps.
#### § 720.21 Members or civilian employees subpoenaed as witnesses in State courts.

Where members or civilian employees are subpoenaed to appear as witnesses in State courts, and are served as described in §§ 720.20, 720.20(d) applies. If these persons are requested to appear as witnesses in State courts when the interests of the Federal Government are involved (e.g., Medical Care Recovery Act cases), follow the procedures described in § 720.22. If State authorities are attempting to obtain the presence of a member or a civilian employee as a witness in a civil or criminal case, and such person is unavailable because of an overseas assignment, the command should immediately contact the Judge Advocate General, or the Associate General Counsel (Litigation), as appropriate.
#### J.R.N., INC. v. RANKIN-PATTERSON OIL CO.

No. 598P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 560

Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1998.
§ 767.27 References. References for submission of permit application, including but not limited to, and as may be further amended: ( a ) National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, 54 U.S.C. 300101 *et seq.* (2014), and Protection of Historic Properties, 36 CFR part 800. This statute and its implementing regulations govern the section 106 review process established by the NHPA.
( b ) National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.,* and Protection of the Environment, 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508. This statute and its implementing regulations require agencies to consider the effects of their actions on the human environment.
( c ) Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation available at *http://www.cr.nps.gov/local-law/arch_stnds_0.htm .* These guidelines establish standards for the preservation planning process with guidelines on implementation.
( d ) Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 470aa-mm, and the Uniform Regulations, 43 CFR part 7, subpart A. This statute and its implementing regulations establish basic government-wide standards for the issuance of permits for archaeological research, including the authorized excavation and/or removal of archaeological resources on public lands or Indian lands.
( e ) Secretary of the Interior's regulations, Curation of Federally-Owned and Administered Archaeological Collections, 36 CFR part 79. These regulations establish standards for the curation and display of federally-owned artifact collections.
( f ) Antiquities Act of 1906, Public Law 59-209, 34 Stat. 225 (codified at 16 U.S.C. 431 *et seq.* (1999)).
( g ) Executive Order 11593, 36 FR 8291, 3 CFR, 1971-1975 Comp., p. 559 (Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment).
( h ) Department of Defense Instruction 4140.21M (DoDI 4140.21M, August 1998). Subject: Defense Disposal Manual.
( i ) Secretary of the Navy Instruction 4000.35A (SECNAVINST 4000.35A, 9 April 2001). Subject: Department of the Navy Cultural Resources Program.