alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 516.1 Purpose. ( a ) This part prescribes policies and procedures for the following: ( 1 ) Defensive and affirmative litigation in Federal and state civilian courts where the Army or DOD has an interest in the matter.
( 2 ) Proceedings before Federal or state administrative bodies, such as utility rate commissions.
( 3 ) Release of official information and testimony by DA personnel with regard to litigation.
( 4 ) Remedies for procurement fraud and corruption.
( 5 ) Environmental civil litigation and administrative proceedings.
( 6 ) Proceedings before the Office of Special Counsel.
( b ) This regulation does not apply to DA or DOD proceedings such as courts-martial or administrative boards.
Exhibit
10.44


 


EXECUTION COPY


 


THIS
NOTE HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT


OF 1933 AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR OTHERWISE


DISPOSED OF UNLESS REGISTERED UNDER THAT ACT


OR AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION IS AVAILABLE.


 


REVOLVING LOAN NOTE


 




	
  $5,000,000

  	
   

  	
  New York, New York

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  March 30, 2006

  






 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, VISTULA
COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. (“Borrower”) hereby promises to pay to the
order of Indigo Investments I LLC (“Lender”), in immediately available
funds, at the conclusion of the Term, the principal sum of up to FIVE MILLION
DOLLARS ($5,000,000), or, if less, the unpaid principal amount of all loans
made pursuant to the Revolving Credit Agreement entered into as of the date
hereof by Lender and Borrower (the “Credit Facility”) then outstanding.


 


The
Borrower also promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount hereof in
like money from the date hereof until paid at the rates and at the times
provided in the Credit Facility.


 


The
date and amount of each advance made under this Revolving Loan Note (“Note”)
shall be set forth on Schedule A hereto.


 


This
Note is referred to in the Credit Facility and is entitled to the benefits
thereof and shall be subject to the provisions thereof. The Company’s
obligations under the Credit Facility and this Note are guaranteed pursuant to
the term of the Guaranty by and between Rupert Galliers-Pratt and Lender.


 


Capitalized
terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning specified
therefor in the Credit Facility.


 


In
case an Event of Default shall occur and be continuing, the principal of and
accrued interest on this Note may be declared due and payable in the manner and
with the effect provided in the Credit Facility.


 


The
Borrower hereby waives presentment, dishonor, notice of dishonor, and protest.


 


THIS
NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICT OF LAW PRINCIPLES THEREOF.


 


 


	
   

  	
  VISTULA COMMUNICATIONS
  SERVICES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Rupert Galliers-Pratt

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Rupert Galliers-Pratt

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  President
  & Chief Executive

  
					



 

















 


Schedule
A


 


	
  Date of Advance

  	
   

  	
  Amount of Advance

  	
   

  	
  Use of Proceeds

  	
   

  
	
  March 30, 2006

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,000,000

  	
   

  	
  Working capital and general corporate purposes.

  	
   

  
							



 


2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>  
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          70,291                  67,244
<SECURITIES>                                 3,165,540               2,321,169
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,428                 855,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,000                 167,793
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                          40,004                  78,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,769                  41,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,377,494               3,112,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,799                  36,052
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,511                  50,511
<COMMON>                                       128,307                 128,307
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,154,877               2,897,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,377,494               3,112,902
<SALES>                                         48,471                  45,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,471                  45,982
<CGS>                                           33,843                  30,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,843                  30,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,628                  15,339
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,000                   4,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,628                  11,039
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,628                  11,039
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00                     .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00                     .00
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6145

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ALTON BERNARD COUTHER, III , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:12

- cr - 00187

- RAJ

- TEM

- 1 )

Submitted : April 16, 2020 Decided: April 21, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Alton Bernard Couther, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alton Bernard Couther, III, appeals the district court’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2018) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Couther , No. 2:12

- cr - 00187

- RAJ

- TEM

- 1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2020)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED
§ 920.16 Required program amendments. Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17, Maryland is required to submit for OSMRE's approval the following proposed program amendments by the dates specified. ( a ) - ( o ) [Reserved]
[51 FR 44790, Dec. 12, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 19282, Apr. 26, 1991; 56 FR 37851, Aug. 9, 1991; 56 FR 63659, Dec. 5, 1991; 57 FR 62222, Dec. 30, 1992; 58 FR 33912, June 22, 1993; 63 FR 13784, Mar. 23, 1998; 63 FR 26454, May 13, 1998; 64 FR 17980, Apr. 13, 1999; 64 FR 36786, July 8, 1999; 66 FR 50829, Oct. 5, 2001]
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1423-B

Hydrogeologic section A-A' and location map—PLATE 1

Casey, 6.0., 1996, Hydrogeologic framework ofthe Midwestern
Basins and Arches Region of Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, and linois

WISCONSIN,
| | [ :

aie

ILLINOIS —-

—

|

|

|

; |
i

——

 ] |
MICHIGAN

= eas
| Bas

_ | INDIANA

B26

| gS ¥ eae B37
| ss oes |e

B30 |
B31

I
ONTARIO
f
wi 42°
——$_—_———
|
oe
| TMm
a
as
es

|

VINV
=i ee

7
z
/ =z
&
S
=
3
>

40°

38°

Base from U.S. Geological Survey digital data,
1:2,000,000, 1972

UNDIFFERENTIATED
MISSISSIPPIAN ROCKS
(not included in study)

200 4

100 4

SEA LEVEL
1004

800 4
—900

ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE AND UNDIFFERENTIATED OLDER ROCKS
(not included in study)

0 20 40

60 MILES

0 20 40 60 KILOMETERS

~1,000 ~ VERTICAL SCALE GREATLY EXAGGERATED

20 40
1 I

60 MILES
J

0
L
r
0

T T T
60 KILOMETERS

SPONTANEOUS

= Miilivotts +

EXPLANATION
Trace of hydrogeologic section

Fault—Location compiled from various sources.
Bar and ball on downthrown side

Location of the Bowling Green Fault Zone—
From VanWagner, 1988

Contact—Dashed where approximate

Potentiometric surface of the Devonian and Silurian
carbonate-rock aquifer—Dashed where approximate

Location of well—Used to construct the
hydrogeologic section

Well in hydrologic section—Number refers to
location of well on location map and in listing of
wells in table 1

GAMMA-RAY

POETENTIAL LOG

Radiation increases,
——

UTHOLOGY HYDROGEOLOGIC

UNITS

Glacial deposits
| Devonian shale UPPER
CONFINING UNIT
Devonian limestone | __ DEVONIAN
or dolomite |CARBONATE-ROCK
i AQUIFER
2
a
z
46
3
2 Silurian limestone ‘SILURIAN
s or dolomite CARBONATE-ROCK
= AQUIFER
5
434
a ‘ BASAL
Ordovician shale | coNINING UNIT

HYDROGEOLOGIC SECTION A-A’' AND LOCATION OF HYDROGEOLOGIC SECTIONS
IN THE MIDWESTERN BASINS AND ARCHES REGION

By
George D. Casey
1996
#### § 552.161 References.

See appendix E to this subpart.
§ 536.66 The “Parker” denial. ( a ) When suit is filed before final action is taken on a subpart D of this part claim, a denial letter will be issued only upon request of DOJ or the trial attorney. If suit is filed prematurely or in error, the claimant may be requested to withdraw the suit without prejudice. Such a request must be coordinated with the trial attorney.
( b ) Claimants who have filed companion claims should be notified that, due to suit being filed, no action can be taken pending the outcome of suit and they may file suit if they wish.
Note to § 536.66 :
For further discussion see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-76.
Flying for: ________________________________ 

Contact: _____________________________

Phone: _________________________

Email: ___________________

 What is your ultimate goal for making this video?

 Demographic who you are trying to reach?

 Music and tempo preference for the video?

 Venue that you would like to showcase?

o Time of day -

o Length of video -

o Specific shots -

o Specific people or items -

o Other -

 Text within the video?

 Your high quality logo and call to action?

 Our logo and splash page

 Editing time, repository and sharing

 Do you have any questions or concerns?
### SUBCHAPTER VI—1890 LAND-GRANT COLLEGE FUNDING
NO. 12-14-00307-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

MARY BROWN HOGG, 

APPELLANT

V.

BUILDERS CAPITAL, LTD.,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on September 25, 

2014. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal, which failed to contain the information required by 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on 

all parties to the trial court's judgment.

On October 27, 2014, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). She 

was further notified that unless she filed an amended notice of appeal on or before November 26, 

2014, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The 

deadline for filing an amended notice of appeal has passed, and Appellant has not corrected her 

defective notice of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12–04–00004–CV, 

2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.–Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied) (mem. op.); Feist v. Hubert, 

No. 12–03–00442–CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.–Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied) 

(mem. op).

Opinion delivered December 10, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 10, 2014

NO. 12-14-00307-CV

MARY BROWN HOGG,

Appellant

V.

BUILDERS CAPITAL, LTD.,

Appellee

Appeal from the 7th District Court 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 11-3112-A)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
### SUBCHAPTER II—HIGH PRIORITY AERONAUTICS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
C. A. No. 76-382.

#### State *v.*John L. Andrews.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for plaintiff.

*William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Barbara Hurst, John A. MacFadyen III,*Asst. Public Defenders, for defendant.

The defendant’s motion that this case be remanded to Superior Court for hearing on motion for bail pending appeal is granted.

At the conclusion of said hearing this case will be returned to this court forthwith.
§ 339.10 Petitions for guidance. ( a ) Any person may petition the Department to withdraw or modify a particular guidance document by sending a written request to the DoD Regulatory Program staff at email address *osd.mc-alex.ocmo.mbx.guidance-documents@mail.mil*. Please use the words “GUIDANCE: [Insert the title of the guidance document]” in the subject line of the email message. The DoD Regulatory Program staff will provide the request to the issuing component of the guidance document for response.
( b ) The issuing component should respond to all requests within 90 days after receipt of the request, or as timely as possible given any constraints of the request. For recordkeeping purposes, the issuing component will provide a copy of their response to the DoD Regulatory Program staff at email address *osd.mc-alex.ocmo.mbx.guidance-documents@mail.mil*.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Health-Benefit Programs Established Through Collective Bargaining, 1945

              																	Kassalow, Everett M. (Everett Malcolm)					,	Nelson, Jean R.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Health-Benefit Programs Established Through Collective Bargaining, 1945 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 841*,												Washington: 								For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4311,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 905.843 Federal enforcement. ( a ) Part 843 of this chapter, Federal Enforcement, shall apply regarding enforcement action on coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) In addition to the requirements of part 843, copies of enforcement actions and orders to show cause will be furnished, upon request, to the California Division of Mining and Geology.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1851

STANLEY JONES; DEBRA JONES,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

CARRIE M. WARD; BWW LAW GROUP; NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:20-cv-03225-GJH)

Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 19, 2021

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Jones, Debra Jones, Appellants Pro Se. Melissa O. Martinez, MCGUIREWOODS, 

LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stanley and Debra Jones appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil 

complaint related to a state foreclosure action. On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because the Joneses’ informal 

brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, they have forfeited 

appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 

2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our 

review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. We further deny the Joneses’ motion for abeyance. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Wallrocks of the central Sierra Nevada batholith, California: A collage of accreted tectono-stratigraphic terranes

By: Warren J. Nokleberg**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1255

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 239.1 Purpose. This part: ( a ) Continues to authorize the Homeowners Assistance Program (HAP) under Section 3374 of title 42, United States Code (U.S.C.), to assist eligible military and civilian Federal employee homeowners when the real estate market is adversely affected directly related to the closure or reduction-in-scope of operations due to Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). Additionally, in accordance with section 1001, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), Public Law 111-5, this part temporarily expands authority provided in section 3374, of title 42 U.S.C., to provide assistance to: Wounded, Injured, or Ill members of the Armed Forces (30 percent or greater disability), wounded Department of Defense (DoD) and Coast Guard civilian homeowners reassigned in furtherance of medical treatment or rehabilitation or due to medical retirement in connection with their disability, surviving spouses of fallen warriors, Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 2005 impacted homeowners relocating during the mortgage crisis, and Service member homeowners undergoing Permanent Change of Station (PCS) moves during the mortgage crisis. This authority is referred to as “Expanded HAP.”
( b ) Establishes policy, authority, and responsibilities for managing Expanded HAP and defines eligibility for financial assistance.
( c ) In accordance with this part, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) has overall responsibility and, through the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment (DUSD(I&E)), provides oversight for this program. The Army, acting as the DoD Executive Agent for administering the HAP, uses the Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE) to implement the program.
#### Charles W. Helmig, appellant, v. Frank L. Dean, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,398.

Suit for commission on sale of real estate. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. Edgar Eldredge, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 27, 1925.

Rehearing denied April 28, 1925.

Butters & Butters, for appellant.

Kelly, Kelly & Kelly, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.