alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Irene Butler, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Alveda Butler et al., Appellants, v. Martin R. Schneider et al., Respondents.

The motion for leave to appeal as a poor person will be treated as a motion to dispense with printing. Motion to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on a typewritten record (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. Appellants are directed to file two copies of the record and five copies of appellants’ brief, and to serve one copy of the record and the brief on the attorneys for respondents. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### DRYE v. NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO.

No. 432F97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 811

Fetition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: GlacierNational Park vacation planner**
 
2008 | 2009 | 2011
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.21/2:G 45/3/
Item Number:0650-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001058434
 
May 29, 2018
#### ASFAR v. CHARLOTTE AUTO AUCTION, INC.

No. 527P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 502

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
Extension of Empolyment Agreement of J. Michael Hightower dated 8/28/2004



 Exhibit 10.38 
 

 
 As of August 28, 2004 
 Mr. James Michael Hightower 
 Vivendi Universal Entertainment LLLP 
 1000 Universal Studios Plaza B-30 
 Orlando, FL 32819 
 Dear Mr. Hightower: 
 Reference is made to the employment agreement between you and Universal Studios, Inc., as assumed by
Vivendi Universal Entertainment LLLP (the “Company”) dated April 25, 2002 (the “Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which you have been employed in an executive capacity. It is now our mutual intention to amend the
Employment Agreement as follows: 
 1. Effective as of August 28, 2004, the current Term (as defined in Paragraph 1 of the Employment
Agreement) shall hereby be extended for a period through and including August 27, 2007. 
 2. Effective as of August 28, 2004, the
two-year option period as described in Paragraph 1(a)(ii) shall be hereby deleted and replaced with nothing. 
 3. Effective as of
August 28, 2004, the title of “Vice President, Project Management for Universal Creative “, as set forth in Paragraph 2 of the Employment Agreement, is hereby deleted and replaced with the title “Senior Vice President, Technical
Services for Universal Parks & Resorts”. 
 4. Effective as of August 28, 2004, your Base Salary (as defined in Paragraph
3(a) of the Employment Agreement) will increase to an annual rate of Two Hundred Eighty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($280,000.00). 
 5.
Effective as of August 28, 2004, your target amount, pursuant to Paragraph 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, shall be thirty percent (30%) of your Base Salary and shall be pro-rated for fiscal year 2004. 
 6. All of the other provisions of the Employment Agreement, which are not modified hereunder, shall remain in full force and effect. 
 Please confirm your agreement to the foregoing by signing in the space provided below. 
  

			
	Sincerely,
	
	Vivendi Universal Entertainment LLLP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kenneth Kahrs



  

			
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:	 	
		
	 /s/ James Hightower
	 	  

	JAMES MICHAEL HIGHTOWER	 	Date

 A00386
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.809 Final disposition of the record of proceedings.

The original decisional document and all appendices thereto, shall in all cases be incorporated in the military service record of the applicant and the service record shall be returned to the custody of the appropriate record holding facility. If a portion of the original record of proceedings cannot be stored with the service record, the service record shall contain a notation as to the place where the record is stored. Other copies including any electromagnetic records, audio and/or videotape recordings or any combination thereof shall be filed in the NDRB case folder and disposed of in accordance with appropriate naval regulations.
#### John Di Costanzo v. Ferdinand J. Fiumano.

Motion to dismiss

appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

      
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         303,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               350,409
<PP&E>                                       2,419,091
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,910,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 881,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,813
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     772,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   881,220
<SALES>                                        942,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               956,802
<CGS>                                          747,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  747,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               186,246
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,437
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,437
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,437
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.31
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2








The
following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 and is not
filed as provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and
Exchange Commission.





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics Research
Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his
knowledge:





(1) the
Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May
      4, 2010
            /s/
      David KeleherSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
  Treasurer
### §1933. Guaranteed rural housing loans; Hawaiian home lands

(a) Rural Housing Loans which (1) are guaranteed by the Secretary under section 517(a)(2) 1 of the Housing Act of 1949 [42 U.S.C. 1487(a)(2)], (2) are made by other lenders approved by the Secretary to provide dwellings in rural areas for the applicants' own use, and (3) bear interest and other charges at rates not above the maximum rates prescribed by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for loans made by private lenders for similar purposes and guaranteed by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under the National Housing Act [12 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.] or superseding legislation shall not be subject to sections 501(c) and 502(b)(3) of the Housing Act of 1949 [42 U.S.C. 1471(c) and 1472(b)(3)].

(b) For the purposes of title V of the Housing Act of 1949 [42 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.] or this chapter, a guarantee of payment given under the color of law by the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (or its successor in function) shall be found by the Secretary reasonably to assure repayment of any indebtedness so guaranteed.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §310C, as added Pub. L. 92–419, title I, §119, Aug. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 664; amended Pub. L. 101–624, title XVIII, §1804, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3819.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 517(a) of the Housing Act of 1949 [42 U.S.C. 1487(a)], referred to in subsec. (a), was amended by Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title V, §514(a)(1)], Nov. 30, 1983, 98 Stat. 1247, and, as so amended, does not contain a par. (2).

The National Housing Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, 48 Stat. 1246, which is classified principally to chapter 13 (§1701 et seq.) of Title 12, Banks and Banking. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 1701 of Title 12 and Tables.

Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, referred to in subsec. (b), is title V of act July 15, 1949, ch. 338, 63 Stat. 432, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§1471 et seq.) of chapter 8A of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 1441 of Title 42 and Tables.

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–624 substituted "or this chapter" for ", as amended".

1 See References in Text note below.
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 13 May 2008 – SNIV v Commission**

**(Case T-327/04)**

Action for annulment – State aid – Time-limit for instituting proceedings – Starting point – Publication of a brief notice in the Official Journal – Internet site – Inadmissibility

Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Point from which time starts to run – Date of publication – Day on which a measure came to the knowledge of the applicant – Subsidiary matter (Art. 230, fifth para., EC) (see paras 21-22, 25-27, 34)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 936 final of 30 March 2004 in relation to the aid measures planned by the French authorities to finance the public rendering service (State aid N 515/2003 – France). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Syndicat national de l’industrie des viandes (SNIV) to bear its own costs and pay those of the Commission; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs. |
§ 1662.22 The FOIA Exemption 5: Internal documents. This exemption covers inter-agency or intra-agency government documents that fall within an evidentiary privilege recognized in civil discovery. Such internal government communications include an agency's communications with an outside consultant or other outside person, with a court, or with Congress, when those communications are for a purpose similar to the purpose of privileged intra-agency communications. Some of the most commonly applicable privileges are described in the following paragraphs: ( a ) *Deliberative process privilege.* This privilege protects the decision-making processes of government agencies. Information is protected under this privilege if it is pre-decisional and deliberative. The purpose of the privilege is to prevent injury to the quality of the agency decision-making process by encouraging open and frank internal discussions, by avoiding premature disclosure of decisions not yet adopted, and by avoiding the public confusion that might result from disclosing reasons that were not in fact the ultimate grounds for an agency's decision. Purely factual material in a deliberative document is within this privilege only if it is inextricably intertwined with the deliberative portions so that it cannot reasonably be segregated, if it would reveal the nature of the deliberative portions, or if its disclosure would in some other way make possible an intrusion into the decision-making process. The privilege continues to protect pre-decisional documents even after a decision is made; however, the Chief FOIA Officer will release pre-decisional deliberative communications that were created 25 years or more before the date on which the records are requested, unless disclosure is otherwise prohibited by law.
( b ) *Attorney work product privilege.* This privilege protects records prepared by or for an attorney in anticipation of or for litigation. It includes documents prepared for purposes of administrative and court proceedings. This privilege extends to information directly prepared by an attorney, as well as materials prepared by non-attorneys working for an attorney.
( c ) *Attorney-client communication privilege.* This privilege protects confidential communications between an attorney and the attorney's client where legal advice is sought or provided.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Greg G. Gruber
                                           Senior Vice President, Chief
                                           Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)

                                           November 10, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural
Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### LLOYD v. JONES

No. 539P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 556

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 March 1998.
#### § 537.7 Notice to USARCS.

Upon receipt of notice of a claim involving either actual or potential amounts within USARCS' monetary jurisdiction, that is, where final action will be taken by USARCS or the Department of Justice, immediate notice will be given to USARCS. Forwarding a copy of the serious incident report, discussed in § 536.22(c) of this chapter, to USARCS, will meet this requirement. Thereafter, mirror file copies will be furnished to USARCS in accordance with AR 27-20, paragraph 2-12. This allows for continuous monitoring and discussion between the ACO and the USARCS area action officer (AAO).
#### COOK v. WATTS

No. 357P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 829

Petition by defendant (Melissa Cook) for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 October 1997.
#### § 225.1 Purpose.

This part establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures for the implementation of patronage expansion pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1065.
#### GRIFFIN v. WOODARD

No. 364P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 649

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-21-0000717

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

YOUNGHUN BAIK, Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

HONOLULU DIVISION

(CASE NO. 1DTA-19-01614)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal of

Appeal, filed April 14, 2022, by Defendant-Appellant Younghun

Baik (Baik), the papers in support, and the record, it appears

that the parties stipulate to dismiss this docketed appeal, under

Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b), attached

to the stipulation is Baik's declaration showing he understands

the consequences of voluntary dismissal, consistent with HRAP

Rule 42(c), and there are no outstanding fees or costs due.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation

for Dismissal of Appeal is approved and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, April 22, 2022.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-21-0000717

22-APR-2022

08:08 AM

Dkt. 14 OAWST
#### (A) Pearl Lebow v. Drah Cab Corp. et al. (B) John F. Donohue v. Progress Marine Corp. et al. (C) Frost House, Inc., v. Preferred Mutual Insurance Company.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bérgan, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ. (D) Northerly Corp. v. Hermett Realty Corporation et al. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ. — [In each action] Motion for leave to reargue or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs.
##### 



ENNIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2006
 EXHIBIT 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 /s/ Keith S. Walters

Keith S. WaltersChairman of the Board andChief Executive OfficerDate: December 22, 2006
 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
§ 553.26 Design of Government-furnished headstones, niche covers, and memorial markers. ( a ) Headstones and memorial markers shall be white marble in an upright slab design. Flat-type granite markers may be used, at the Executive Director's discretion, when the terrain or other obstruction precludes use of an upright marble headstone or memorial marker.
( b ) Niche covers shall be white marble.
( c ) The Executive Director shall approve the design of headstones and memorial markers erected for group burials, consistent with the policies of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134819 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134819 COA: 270382 Ionia CC: 05-013053-FH WILLIE LEE NASH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e August 9, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1213 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 20, 2007

Clerk