alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32






                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.
     (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as
     filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), Robert C. Stempel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
     Stephan W. Zumsteg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively,
     do each hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
     2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that based on his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


     /S/ Robert C. Stempel
     ------------------------------
     Robert C. Stempel
     Chief Executive Officer
     November 9, 2004



     /S/ Stephan W. Zumsteg
     ------------------------------
     Stephan W. Zumsteg
     Chief Financial Officer
     November 9, 2004
#### § 202.3 Notification of formation of a Restoration Advisory Board.

Prior to establishing a RAB, an installation shall notify potential stakeholders of its intent to form a RAB. In announcing the formation of a RAB, the installation should describe the purpose of a RAB and discuss opportunities for membership.
#### § 284.3 Definitions.

*Committee.* The person or persons invested, by order of a proper court, with the guardianship of a minor or incompetent person and/or the estate of a minor or incompetent person.

*Component concerned.* The agency/activity (as well as the official designated by the Head of the agency/activity) required to perform the function or take the action indicated or that notifies the individual of the debt that is the subject of a waiver application.

*Debt.* An amount an individual owes the Government as the result of erroneous payments of pay and allowances (including travel and transportation allowances) to or on behalf of members of the Uniformed Services or civilian DoD employees.

*Employee.* A person who is or was an officer or employee as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2104 and 2105.

*Erroneous payment.* A payment that is not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations.

*Final action.* A finding by the appropriate official under this part concerning a waiver application from which there is no right to appeal or request reconsideration, or for which the time limit prescribed in this part for submitting an appeal or request for reconsideration has expired without such a submission.

*Member.* A member or former member of the Uniformed Services.

*Waiver application.* A request that the United States relinquish its claim against an individual for a debt resulting from erroneous payments of pay or allowances (including travel and transportation allowances) under 10 U.S.C. 2774, 32 U.S.C. 716, and 5 U.S.C. 5584.
#### § 536.28 Claims acknowledgment.

Claims personnel will acknowledge all claims immediately upon receipt, in writing, by telephone, or in person. A defective claim will be acknowledged in writing, pointing out its defects. Where the defects render the submission jurisdictionally deficient based on the requirements discussed in DA Pam 27-162, paragraphs 2-5 and 2-6, the claimant or attorney will be informed in writing of the need to present a proper claim no later than two years from the date of accrual. Suit must be filed in maritime claims not later than two years from the date of accrual. See § 536.122. In any claim for personal injury or wrongful death, an authorization signed by the patient, natural or legal guardian or estate representative will be obtained authorizing the use of medical information, including medical records, in order to use sources other than claims personnel to evaluate the claim as required by the Health Care Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), 42 U.S.C. 1320d-1320d-8. See the parallel discussion at DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-7.
### SUBCHAPTER III–A—FOOD FOR DEVELOPMENT
### SUBCHAPTER II—SERVICE CAREER DEVELOPMENT, TRAINING, AND MANAGEMENT
• There is often a systemic reaction within 24-36 hours characterized by restlessness,

fever, chills, nausea, weakness

and joint pain. 

• Tissue at the site of the bite

and the surrounding area dies

and eventually sheds.

Protection 

• Wear a long-sleeved shirt, hat,

gloves, and boots when handling stored boxes, firewood,

lumber and rocks, etc.

• Inspect and shake out clothing

and shoes before getting

dressed.

• Use insect repellants, such as

DEET or Picaridin, on clothing

and footwear.

Treatment

• Clean the bite area with soap

and water.

• Apply ice to the bite area to

slow absorption of the venom.

• Elevate and immobilize the

bitten extremity.

• Capture the spider, if at all possible, for identification purposes.

• Seek medical attention.

Identification 

• Body size: 1/4 to 3/4 inch 

(6.4-19.1mm)

• Color: Golden brown 

• A dark violin/fiddle shape

(see top photo) is located on

the top of the leg attachment

region (cephalothorax) with

the neck of the violin/fiddle

pointing backward toward 

the abdomen.

• Unlike most spiders that

have 8 eyes, the brown

recluse has 6 eyes. The eyes,

arranged in pairs – one pair

in front and a pair on either

side – can be readily seen

under low magnification. 

Habitat 

The Brown Recluse Spider

builds small retreat webs

behind objects of any type. 

Symptoms 

• The severity of the bite may

vary. Symptoms may vary

from none to very severe. 

• The bite generally becomes 

reddened within several 

hours.

FactSheet

Protect Yourself! Workers may be exposed to

Brown Recluse Spider

The brown recluse belongs to a group of spiders commonly known as violin spiders

or fiddlebacks. The characteristic fiddle-shaped pattern is located on the top of the

leg attachment region (cephalothorax). Because they are secluded and withdrawn,

as their name implies, the brown recluse avoids open spaces. Brown recluse spiders

are dangerous and they can bite and inject toxic venom.

This is one in a series of informational fact sheets highlighting OSHA programs, policies or standards. It does

not impose any new compliance requirements. For a comprehensive list of compliance requirements of OSHA

standards or regulations, refer to Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This information will be made

available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. The voice phone is (202) 693-1999; teletypewriter (TTY)

number: (877) 889-5627.

U.S. Department of Labor

www.osha.gov

(800) 321-OSHA

For more complete information:

DSG 10/2005

Photo: R. Bessin, University of Kentucky

Photo: creatures.ifas.ufl.edu
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Injuries and Accident Causes in the Slaughtering and Meat-Packing Industry, 1943

              																	McCormack, George R. (George Robertson)					,	McElroy, Frank S. (Frank Shafer)					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Injuries and Accident Causes in the Slaughtering and Meat-Packing Industry, 1943 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 855*,												Washington: 								For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., 										1946,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4321,			accessed on September 24, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel J. Macon, Appellant.

On the court’s own motion, the decision handed down May 9, 1960 (10 A D 2d 953) is amended by striking out the designation of counsel and by substituting therefor John Dunaif, Esq., 66 Court St., Brooklyn, N. Y., as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                       6,755,000
<SECURITIES>                                 8,751,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,830,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   982,000
<INVENTORY>                                 69,259,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            99,131,000
<PP&E>                                     287,398,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             151,036,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             266,927,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       76,561,000
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,768,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               266,927,000
<SALES>                                    230,744,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           230,744,000
<CGS>                                      171,362,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              171,362,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            57,739,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,171,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,528,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,528,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,528,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Ari Bronshtein, Co-Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 28, 2010
/s/ Ari BronshteinAri BronshteinCo-Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
### §1446c. Domestic disposal programs for dairy products

In order to prevent the accumulation of excessive inventories of dairy products the Secretary of Agriculture shall undertake domestic disposal programs under authorities granted in the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 [7 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.] and the Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended [7 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.], or as otherwise authorized by law.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title II, §204(c), 68 Stat. 900.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, referred to in text, is act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, 52 Stat. 31, which is classified principally to chapter 35 (§1281 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1281 of this title and Tables.

The Agricultural Act of 1949, referred to in text, is act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, 63 Stat. 1051, which is classified principally to chapter 35A (§1421 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agricultural Act of 1954, and not as part of the Agricultural Act of 1949 which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of the 1949 Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Report of Dairy Product Purchases

Pub. L. 101–624, title I, §105, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3379, provided that: "The Secretary of Agriculture shall make available to the public quarterly evaluations of the acquisition and disposal of Commodity Credit Corporation purchases of dairy products."
### Tectonic implications of the Indian Run Formation— A newly recognized sedimentary mélange in the northern Virginia Piedmont

By: Avery Ala Drake

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1324

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit
      4.4





**[Rurban
      Financial Corp. Letterhead]**





March
      21,
      2008





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      D.C. 20549





Re:
            Rurban
                Financial Corp. – Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
                ended December 31, 2007





Ladies
      and Gentlemen:





Rurban
      Financial Corp., an Ohio corporation (“Rurban”), is today filing with the
      Securities and Exchange Commision (the “SEC”) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
      Rurban for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 ( “Rurban’s 2007 Form
      10-K”)





Pursuant
      to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of
      Regulation S-K, Rurban hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies
      of instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of long-term debt
      and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being
      filed as exhibits to Rurban’s 2007 Form 10-K. None of such long-term debt
      exceeds 10% of the total assets of Rurban and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
      basis.





Very
                truly yours,RURBAN
                FINANCIAL CORP./s/
                Duane L. SinnDuane
                L. SinnExecutive
                Vice President andChief
                Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 153 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 153

   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Veterans' 
            Affairs in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2023

     Mr. Bost (for himself and Mr. Takano) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Veterans' 
            Affairs in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $10,753,197 for the One Hundred 
Eighteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,271,175 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2023, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2024; and
            (2) not more than $5,482,022 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2024, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2025.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4947

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JUAN CARLOS MEJIA, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District 

Judge. (6:08-cr-00005-nkm-2) 

Submitted: August 21, 2009 Decided: September 10, 2009 

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Larry W. Shelton, Federal Public Defender, Randy V. Cargill, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Christine Madeleine Spurell, 

Research and Writing Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. 

Julia C. Dudley, United States Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Juan Carlos Mejia was found guilty by a jury of 

conspiracy to distribute less than 500 grams of methamphetamine 

(Count 1), and possession with intent to distribute more than 50 

grams of methamphetamine (Count 2). On appeal, Mejia argues: 

(1) that the district court erred by denying his motion for a 

mistrial, and (2) the district court erred by sentencing him 

based on greater drug amounts than found by the jury. For the 

reasons that follow, we affirm. 

 We review a district court’s refusal to grant a new 

trial for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Huggins, 191 

F.3d 532, 536 (4th Cir. 1999). Mejia argues that the prosecutor 

asked a question that impermissibly impinged on his right to 

remain silent in violation of Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 

(1976). We agree with the district court that the facts of the 

instant case are very similar to those discussed in Greer v. 

Miller, 483 U.S. 756, 764-65 (1987), and thus do not violate 

Doyle. Therefore, we find no abuse of discretion by the 

district court for denying Mejia’s motion on that basis. 

Huggins, 191 F.3d at 536. 

 After United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), we 

review a district court’s sentence for an abuse of discretion. 

Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, , 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 

(2007) (providing review standard). Despite an advisory 

2 
3 

Sentencing Guidelines range of 188-235 months, Mejia was 

sentenced to 150 months imprisonment for each count to be served 

concurrently. We find no significant procedural error, id., or 

substantive error, United States v. Evans, 526 F.3d 155, 161 

(4th Cir.), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 476 (2008), in Mejia’s 

sentence. Thus, we find the sentence was reasonable. See

United States v. Pauley, 511 F.3d 468, 473 (4th Cir. 2007) 

(stating that reasonableness review focuses on whether a 

sentencing court abused its discretion when imposing a 

sentence). 

 Accordingly, we affirm Mejia’s convictions and 

sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED