alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1423-B
Hydrogeologic sections B-B', C-C', D-D', and E-E'-PLATE 2

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Casey, 6.0., 1996, Hycrogeologic framework ofthe Midwestern
Basins and Arches Region of Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, and linois

FEET
r— 1,200

B'

‘Now3s

F- 1,100

[— 1,000

f- 900

t— 800

f— 700

}— 600

[~ SEA LEVEL

[- —100

+ -300
/- ~400
500
[600
100
L- -800

NIONaa

5
8

Jony wey apa:

2041y PW

NoW93s

9-0

NoUg3S

ougas
NIGNSE

NoUgas
NONE

Nol33s

MISSISSIPPIAN ROCKS AND
UNDIFFERENTIATED YOUNGER

ROCKS (not included in study)

wan

Jeny

NiaNae § Kies

NoUwoas
NIGNSE as

lwaishs Aajen y20upeg 1ewWOYEHY
shea] ayy jo Aayen we

os

a
3

NUON

Nowaas
NIONG

NoUo3s
NIONSE

NoUoas
NIONSE

Nowo3s

NION3® NOUDIS

NIGN3E

NoWaas

042] emaulssissin =

FEET

8

sen ys

Es

NOONE

oe

aS
By.
a
eq
5

Jang aayequey

Nougas

a Y

———

a
KA

Juded in study)

AND UNDIFFERENTIATED OLDER
ROCKS (not inc!

ORODVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE

EXPLANATION
Contact—Dashed where approximate

— =1,000

3 s|_s 5
s ze Le
ze gs|2e8 zu
gs £2/235 5
ae £2) S23 228
g =) gs 58
= 8) 4 =

BASAL
CONFINING UNIT

Glacial deposits

Devonian shale

Devonian limestone
or dolomite

Silurian limestone
or dolomite

LITHOLOGY

. g 8 g &
l ! ! ! |

Ordovician shale

41334 NI Zavauns GNI MOTaS Hd30

carbonate-rock aquifer—Dashed where approximate

(plate 1) and in listing of wells in table 1

T T T T

Potentiometric surface of the Devonian and Silurian

Well—Number refers to location of well on location map

GAMMA-RAY
LOG
Radiation increases

Be, L L Ll l 1
ES2&egesgege¢e¢e28 28 85 & 88
Ltt | tt tt |

fF 800

}—- ~900

[— -1,000

60 MILES
J

T

60 KILOMETERS

f—- -1,100

— -1,200

200

NoUg3s.
NIONaa

a ee

Noitoas

NoUgas
NUON

NaUgas
NIONaE

NoWoas
NIONaa—~

GLACIAL DEPOSITS

Nowa3s

NIGNI

as
wee 8 (¢
NI ON3E \\

i

AND UNDIFFERENTIATED OLDER
ROCKS (not included in study)

|ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE

\
Nola3s 5 ll

NIONSG
i

ousas “Nw suewawes

NION@

Naua3s

NIONaS

wifer absent:

Nows3s_§

NIFONG

bonate-rock|

nouns 8S

NTONaE 6
5

NOLL93S S Af
NIGNSE 6

ad

Nous

NONE Ny
Na193.

Le sony ang big N

_.

Nowgas

insu

‘TRENTON LIMESTONE AND UNDIFFERENTIATED
OLDER ROCK (not included

3

3

g

5

| a a a a

P2ER SF SRESREREESER EE SRE REE R
By

EI g8 8

BR28sege2egsseeg8h8 $8 FF FSR SECTS

Lp} tt |

Q

YNVION!

OIKO _ Nawg3s

Nowsas
NIGNIE

Nouwgas
NION38 Nou1935

Nauigas NI GNIS
NI GN

“OHO

Nolas
NION@

NoUa3s
NONI

NIGNag

NoU3as

NOWaS
2,

Noingas
1

sony ydasop wes.

ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE
‘AND UNDIFFERENTIATED OLDER
ROCKS (not included in study)

VERTICAL SCALE GREATLY EXAGGERATED

LY NOWLIIS

: 8 ae

2 2 ws oe

Fi Fl com

20 = ze

5 &
ee ee ee ee ee ee ee eee T T T T T T T TT TTT ST TT TO OT OT hu UT UT Trd?g?r?rrTirgrge?? -o errr rer eri ri et! ee
ESERERERERREESRRERERERE GRERRRRERERREZSRH SHER ER EER PRSERREREER REGS RR ER HR ER EES

SEA LEVEL 4

‘SEA LEVEL 4

SEA LEVEL 4

HYDROGEOLOGIC SECTIONS B-B', C-C', D-D', AND E-E'IN THE MIDWESTERN BASINS AND ARCHES REGION

By
George D. Casey

1996
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the ‘‘Company’’) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), the undersigned, Rinat Remler, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2008





/s/ Rinat RemlerRinat RemlerVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)


---
§ 34.22 Federally owned property. ( a ) *Annual inventory.* Recipients shall submit annually an inventory listing of all Federally owned property in their custody (property furnished by the Federal Government, rather than acquired by the recipient with Federal funds under the award), to the DoD Component or other Federal agency responsible for administering the property under the award.
( b ) *Use on other activities.* ( 1 ) Use of federally owned property on other activities is permissible, if authorized by the DoD Component responsible for administering the award to which the property currently is charged.
( 2 ) Use on other activities will be in the following order of priority: ( i ) Activities sponsored by DoD Components' grants, cooperative agreements, or other assistance awards;
( ii ) Activities sponsored by other Federal agencies' grants, cooperative agreements, or other assistance awards;
( iii ) Activities under Federal procurement contracts, or activities not sponsored by any Federal agency. If so used, use charges shall be assessed to those activities. For real property or equipment, the use charges shall be at rates equivalent to those for which comparable real property or equipment may be leased. The use charges shall be treated as program income.
( c ) *Disposition of property.* Upon completion of the award, the recipient shall report the property to the responsible agency. The agency may: ( 1 ) Use the property to meet another Federal Government need (e.g., by transferring accountability for the property to another Federal award to the same recipient, or by directing the recipient to transfer the property to a Federal agency that needs the property, or to another recipient with a currently funded award).
( 2 ) Declare the property to be excess property and either: ( i ) Report the property to the General Services Administration, in accordance with the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 483(b)(2)), as implemented by General Services Administration regulations at 41 CFR 101-47.202; or
( ii ) Dispose of the property by alternative methods, if there is statutory authority to do so (e.g., DoD Components are authorized by 15 U.S.C. 3710(i), the Federal Technology Transfer Act, to donate research equipment to educational and nonprofit organizations for the conduct of technical and scientific education and research activities. Such donations shall be in accordance with the DoD implementation of E.O. 12999 (3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 180), “Educational Technology: Ensuring Opportunity for All Children in the Next Century,” as applicable.) Appropriate instructions shall be issued to the recipient by the responsible agency.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF PETER KOSTYSHYN FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS § § No. 116, 2019 § § Submitted: March 28, 2019 Decided: April 2, 2019

ORDER On March 12, 2019, the petitio ner, Peter Kostyshyn, file d a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the Superior Court to release him immediately to Level III supervision. On March 12, 2019, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Kostyshyn to show why this appeal should not be dismissed based on: (i) his failure to comply with this Court’s July 16, 20 13 order requiring him to include the filing fee or a properly completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with pro se filings relating to his criminal cases; and (ii) his failure to state a basis for the issuance of a writ of mandamus. Kostyshyn failed to re spond to the notice to show cause within the required the ten-day period, making dismissal deemed to be unopposed. This is the third proceeding Kostyshyn ha s instituted in this Court relating to his alleged violation of probation in 2018. 1 If Kostyshyn files any additional

1 Kostyshyn v. State , 2019 WL 327961, at *1 (Del. Jan. 23, 2019) (dismissing interlocutory appeal regarding Kostyshyn’s competency for a co ntested violation of probation hearing); In re Kostyshyn , No. 115, 2019 (interlocutory appeal from the Superior Court’s February 21, 2019 rulings).2 interlocutory appeals or writs in this Court relating to this violation of probation, the

Clerk is directed not to docket such filings absent leave of the Court. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, unde r Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(c), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ERIE
FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS DATED JUNE 30, 1999 AND ARE QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       636,785,293
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                 150,463,356
<MORTGAGE>                                  10,062,729
<REAL-ESTATE>                                1,500,015
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             823,159,292
<CASH>                                         884,124
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             150,060
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      74,415,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             927,965,115
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            702,814,935
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            193,102
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,195,333
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        5,477,316
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,410,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 166,526,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               927,965,115
<PREMIUMS>                                  20,821,338
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         27,299,855
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           2,650,641
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 372,736
<BENEFITS>                                  25,962,562
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  3,003,551
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         5,406,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,771,884
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,011,516
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,760,368
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,760,368
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0



</TABLE>
### §124f. Intelligence training development for State and local government officials

#### (a) Curriculum

The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis, shall—

(1) develop a curriculum for training State, local, and tribal government officials, including law enforcement officers, intelligence analysts, and other emergency response providers, in the intelligence cycle and Federal laws, practices, and regulations regarding the development, handling, and review of intelligence and other information; and

(2) ensure that the curriculum includes executive level training for senior level State, local, and tribal law enforcement officers, intelligence analysts, and other emergency response providers.

#### (b) Training

To the extent possible, the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center and other existing Federal entities with the capacity and expertise to train State, local, and tribal government officials based on the curriculum developed under subsection (a) shall be used to carry out the training programs created under this section. If such entities do not have the capacity, resources, or capabilities to conduct such training, the Secretary may approve another entity to conduct such training.

#### (c) Consultation

In carrying out the duties described in subsection (a), the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis shall consult with the Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and other appropriate parties, such as private industry, institutions of higher education, nonprofit institutions, and other intelligence agencies of the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title II, §209, as added Pub. L. 110–53, title V, §503(a), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 312.)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 996 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Dr. Rudy 

Lombard Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Mr. CARTER of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana, Ms. LETLOW, and Mr. SCALISE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Dr. Rudy Lombard Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DR. RUDY LOMBARD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New 

6 Orleans, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Dr. Rudy Lombard Post Office Building’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 996 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Rudy Lombard 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 26.630 Debarment.

*Debarment* means an action taken by a Federal agency to prohibit a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions. A recipient so prohibited is debarred, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID MORDEKHAY and CONTINENTAL CONNECTIONS USA, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

ORI DARMON, derivatively as a member and on behalf of D.O.D. 

INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, S.B. MIAMI 

DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, and BERAZ 

INVESTMENT LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company derivatively as 

members and on behalf of D.O.D. HOLDINGS, LLC, a Florida Limited 

Liability Company,

Appellees.

No. 4D2022-3153

[March 14, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Sandra Perlman, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE16-014391.

Nancy W. Gregoire Stamper of Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, 

Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Lyle E. Shapiro and Beatriz M. Carta of Herskowitz Shapiro, PLLC, 

Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 210.4 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower, Reserve Affairs, and Logistics) shall modify this part as appropriate.
( b ) Secretaries of the Military Departments shall comply with this part.
§ 536.108 Claims payable under international agreements (for those arising in the United States). ( a ) Within the United States, Art. VIII, NATO SOFA applies to claims arising within the North Atlantic Treaty Area, which includes CONUS and its territories and possessions north of the Tropic of Cancer (23.5 degrees north latitude). This excludes Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and parts of Hawaii. Third-party scope claims are payable under subpart D or, if the claim arises incident to noncombat activities, under subpart C of this part. Maritime claims are payable under subpart H of this part. The provisions of these subparts on what claims are payable apply equally here. The members of the foreign force or civilian component must be acting in pursuance of the applicable treaty's objectives.
( b ) Within the United States, third-party ex gratia claims are payable only by the sending State and are not payable under subpart E of this part.
#### § 37.1310 Intellectual property.

Inventions, data, works of authorship, and other intangible products of intellectual effort that can be owned by a person, whether or not they are patentable or may be copyrighted. The term also includes mask works, such as those used in microfabrication, whether or not they are tangible.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the annual report of Energroup Holdings Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wang Shu, Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.






Date:
      March 31, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Wang
      ShuWang
      ShuChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 516.74 General. ( a ) This subpart implements 10 U.S.C. § 982 and DOD Directive 5525.8. It establishes Army policy concerning soldiers on active duty who are summoned to serve on state and local juries.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to Army National Guard soldiers in an annual training or full-time AGR (Active Guard Reserve) status under Title 32, U.S. Code. Soldiers in a Title 32 status must refer to their respective state law for relief from state or local jury duty.
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
May 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 135427 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. BOBBIE J. BRASHERS, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 135427 COA: 279999 Kalamazoo CC: 06-000638-NI DEBORAH J. VANDERROEST, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 28, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

W EAVER , J., dissents from the denial order, wo uld grant leave to appeal, and states as follows:

I dissent from the majority of four’s (Chief Justice Taylor, and Justices Corrigan, Young, and Markman’s) denial of plaintiff’s application fo r leave to appeal requesting that this Court reconsider its decision in Kreiner v Fischer , 471 Mich 109 (2004), because this Court needs to reexamine the misinterpretation of MCL 500.3135 contained in the majority of four’s opinion in Kreiner . I would grant leave to appeal to reconsider and correct the majority’s misinterp retation of MCL 500.3135 in Kreiner

. By importing the concept of permanency of in jury into MCL 50 0.3135—a concept that is nowhere referenced in the text of the statute—the majority of four, in Kreiner
, actively and judicially legislated a permanency and temporal requirement to recover noneconomic damages in automobile accident cases. 1 The Kreiner interpretation of MCL 500.3135 is an unrestrained misuse a nd abuse of the power of interpretation,

1 For further analysis of the problems created by the majority of four’s Kreiner opinion, see my dissent in Jones v Olson (Docket No. 132385), _ __ Mich ___, ___ (2008)._______________________________________ __ 2

masquerading as an exercise in following the Legislature’s intent, which needs to be corrected to comport with the actual text of MCL 500.3135.

I would grant leave to appeal.

d0506 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
May 9, 2008
Clerk
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Hurco Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ John G. OblazneyJohn
      G. OblazneyVice
      President & Chief Financial OfficerJanuary
      12, 2011




69