alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-11176 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PAUL WAYNE HOLT, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CR-340-ALL-L

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Paul Wayne Holt appeals following his guilty plea to using, carrying, and possessing a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) & (B), and to unlawful possession of a weapon by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The Government argues that we lack appellate jurisdiction because Holt's notice of appeal failed to designate the final judgment as the order being appealed. We conclude that United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-11176 -2- we have appellate jurisdiction. See United States v. Knowles , 29 F.3d 947, 949-50 (5th Cir. 1994). Holt argues that the factual basis for his guilty plea was insufficient to support the interstate commerce element of the felon-in-possession offense because the parties stipulated only that the firearms had previously been shipped and transported in interstate commerce at some unspecified date. He acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Fifth Circuit precedent and states that he raises the claim to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review. Holt's claim is foreclosed by circuit precedent. See United States v. Cavazos , 288 F.3d 706, 712-13 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 537 U.S. 910 (2002); United States v. Daugherty , 264 F.3d 513, 518 & n.12 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### § 37.100 What does this part do?

This part establishes uniform policies and procedures for the DoD Components' award and administration of technology investment agreements (TIAs).
### §1404. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–4, title V, §566, Mar. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 73

Section, Pub. L. 110–161, div. E, title VI, §605, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2096, related to the port of entry technology demonstration program.
EXHIBIT 32.2

ALTERA CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Altera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Timothy R. Morse, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 25, 2008



/s/ TIMOTHY R. MORSETimothy R. MorseSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altera Corporation and will be retained by
Altera Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1630.44 Class 4-F: Registrant not acceptable for military service.

In Class 4-F shall be placed any registrant who is found by the Secretary of Defense, under applicable physical, mental or administrative standards, to be not acceptable for service in the Armed Forces; except that no such registrant whose further examination or re-examination is determined by the Secretary of Defense to be justified shall be placed in Class 4-F until such further examination has been accomplished and such registrant continues to be found not acceptable for military service.

[52 FR 24456, July 1, 1987]
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Paul M. Joeckel, the Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Exploration Company, (the Company),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 13, 2007



/s/ Paul M. JoeckelName: Paul M. JoeckelTitle: Secretary and Vice President Operations
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1031 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the situation 

at the southern border is an invasion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2024 

Mrs. LESKO (for herself, Mr. GOODEN of Texas, Mr. OGLES, Mr. SELF, Mr. 

NORMAN, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. BURGESS, Ms. DE LA CRUZ, Mrs. 

HINSON, Mr. BRECHEEN, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. MIKE GARCIA of 

California, Ms. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. BURLISON, Mr. FULCHER, Mr. 

BAIRD, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BIGGS, Ms. 

MACE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. BABIN, Mr. FEENSTRA, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, and 

Mr. NEHLS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the situation at the southern border is an invasion. 

Whereas over 8 million illegal immigrants have crossed the 

southern border since January of 2021; 

Whereas there has been an over 1,000-percent increase of 

people on the terrorist watchlist crossing the southern 

border; and 

Whereas thousands of pounds of deadly drugs have flowed 

over the southern border, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans: Now, therefore, be it 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1031 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the situation at the southern border is 

3 an invasion. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### § 228.11 Restrictions on the taking of photographs.

In order to protect the security of the Agency's facilities, photographs may be taken on protected property only with the consent of the NSA Director of Security or his designee. The taking of photographs includes the use of television cameras, video taping equipment, and still or motion picture cameras.
(June 11, 1962)

#### George Abrams et al., Respondents, v. Gordon Barnes, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, the defendant Barnes appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 19, 1962, which denied his motion to set aside a default judgment entered against him, and to permit him to interpose an answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint. Order reversed, without costs; and motion granted, without costs, upon condition that, within 10 days after the service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, defendant Barnes shall serve his answer and pay the sum of $300 to plaintiffs and their attorneys for the expenses incurred and the services rendered by reason of his default. In our opinion, the alleged carelessness of the moving defendant’s insurance carrier in losing the copy of the summons and complaint served upon such defendant should not be attributed to him. In view of the fact that plaintiffs have had to take an inquest against him, the plaintiffs and their attorneys should be recompensed to the extent of $300 for their extra expenses and work. The opening of this defendant’s default should not seriously prejudice plaintiffs in the prosecution of the action, since the action is still at issue as to the codefendant Seidito, and since both defendants are represented by the same insurance carrier. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-22877, No. 33-37159, No. 33-57350, No. 33-61085, No. 333-06859, No. 333-32555, No. 333-62917, No. 333-81787, No. 333-31304, No. 333-37216, No. 333-41688,No. 333-47722, No. 333-54384, No. 333-56776, No. 333-61682, No. 333-87382, No. 333-105296, No. 333-115658, and No. 333-125904) of Altera Corporation of our report dated February 26, 2007 relating to theconsolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

February 26, 2007
Exhibit 10.01.1


                            Modification Agreement


     Modification Agreement made as of this 1st day of March, 1997 by and 
between Eastco Industrial Safety Corp., a New York corporation with offices at
130 West 10th Street, Huntington Station, New York 11746 (hereinafter referred
to as the "Employer") and Alan E. Densen, an individual residing at 325 Doral 
Court, Jericho, New York 11753, (hereinafter referred to as the "Employee").

     Whereas, the Employee has entered into an employment agreement with the
Employer dated as of July 1, 1995 (the "Agreement"); and

     Whereas, the parties desired to amend the Agreement.

     Now Therefore, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants
hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows:

     1.   The first "Whereas" clause and Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby
amended to change the corporate position of the Employee from President to
Senior Vice-President.

     2.   Section 4 a.(i) of the Agreement is amended to change the first
sentence in the Agreement to provide that the Employee shall be paid a minimum
of $133,000 through and including June 30, 1997.

     3.   Section 10 of the Agreement is amended to provide that the first
sentence of Section 10 a.(ii) is amended to change 120 days during any twelve-
month period to any 6 months in any consecutive 24 month period.

     4.   Except as modified hereunder the Employment Agreement of July 1, 1995
shall continue in full force and effect.

     In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above written.

                                   EASTCO INDUSTRIAL SAFETY CORP.

                                   By: /s/ ANTHONY P. TOWELL
                                       ---------------------
                                        ANTHONY P. TOWELL


                                   By:/s/ ALAN E. DENSEN
                                      -------------------
                                       ALAN E. DENSEN, Employee
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Stevan R. Schott, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 9thday of August, 2005.



/s/ Stevan R. SchottStevan R. SchottSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §8150. Effect on other statutes

(a) This subchapter does not affect the maritime rights and remedies of a master or member of the crew of a vessel.

(b) Section 8141 of this title and section 9491 of title 10 do not confer military or veteran status on any individual.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 555; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §809(c)(4), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1841.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (a) | 5 U.S.C. 791–4(b). | Oct. 14, 1949, ch. 691, §305(b), 63 Stat. 868. |
| (b) | 5 U.S.C. 803a. | Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 926, §1 "Sec. 4", 70 Stat. 981. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "section 9491 of title 10" for "section 9441 of title 10".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Exhibit 32










                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.
     (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, as
     filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), Robert C. Stempel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
     Stephan W. Zumsteg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively,
     do each hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
     2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that based on his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


     /s/ Robert C. Stempel
     ------------------------------
     Robert C. Stempel
     Chief Executive Officer
     February 9, 2005


     /s/ Stephan W. Zumsteg
     ------------------------------
     Stephan W. Zumsteg
     Chief Financial Officer
     February 9, 2005
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 51810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20368]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at George M. Bryan Airport Starkville, Mississippi

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on land release request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(c), 
notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from the 
Starkville Board of Alderman to waive the requirement that a 10.01-acre 
parcel of surplus property, located at the George M. Bryan Airport, be 
used for aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 20, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Jackson Airports 
District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208-
2307.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Rodney Lincoln, Airport Manager, at the 
following address: George M. Bryan Airport, 120 Airport Rd., 
Starkville, MS 39759.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Shumate, Program Manager, or 
Brian Hendry, Community Planner, at the Jackson Airports District 
Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208-2307, 
(601)664-9882. The land release request may be reviewed in person at 
this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by George M. 
Bryan Airport to release 10.01 acres of surplus property at the 
Starkville/Oktibbeha County Airport. The property will be purchased by 
Golden Triangle Planning and Development District for a passive 
recreation park. The net proceeds from the sale of this property will 
be used for Airport Improvement Program eligible development.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, any 
person may, upon request, inspect the request, notice and other 
documents germane to the request in person at the George M. Bryan 
Airport.

    Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on August 12, 2013.
Rans D. Black,
Manager, Jackson Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2013-20368 Filed 8-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### Louis Stone v. William Andacht, Inc.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing granted only insofar as to dispense with the printing of the record on appeal and the appellant’s points and permitting the appeal to be heard upon three printed copies of the case on appeal used in the Appellate Term plus three typewritten copies of the additional papers required on appeal to this court and upon typewritten appellant’s points upon condition that one typewritten copy of the additional papers required on appeal to this court and one typewritten copy of the appellant’s points are served upon the attorney for the respondent and six typewritten, copies of the appellant’s points are filed with this court together with three copies of the record on appeal as hereinbefore provided. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
Exhibit 13.2

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of Sasol is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under Section 404 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management is required to assess the effectiveness of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether the Company's internal control over financial reporting is
effective.

Sasol's
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the chief executive and chief financial officer to provide reasonable assurance as to the
reliability of Sasol's financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting practice, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorisations of our management and directors; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.

Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management
assessed the effectiveness of Sasol's internal control over financial reporting as of 30 June 2009. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in "Internal ControlIntegrated Framework". Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of 30 June 2009,
Sasol's internal control over financial reporting was effective.

KPMG Inc.,
an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an opinion on the effectiveness of Sasol's internal control over financial reporting as stated in their
report which appears herein.

Date: 9 October 2009By:

/s/ LAWRENCE PATRICK ADRIAN DAVIESLawrence Patrick Adrian Davies
Chief ExecutiveDate: 9 October 2009By:

/s/ KANDIMATHIE CHRISTINE RAMONKandimathie Christine Ramon
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### § 536.146 Claims against nonappropriated fund employees—generally.

This subpart sets forth the procedures to follow in the settlement and payment of claims generated by the acts or omissions of the employees of nonappropriated fund (NAF) activities. NAF activities include NAF or Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) facilities, post exchanges, bowling centers, officers and noncommissioned officers' clubs, and other facilities located on land or situated in a building used by an activity that employs personnel compensated from NAFs.