alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William Martirano, Appellant, v. M. D. Valger, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, plaintiff appeals: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 25, 1962, which denied his motion for a general preference pursuant to the Trial Term Rules of said court; and (2) from an order of the same court, dated November 7, 1962, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to the court’s original decision. Order of November 7, 1962, insofar as it adheres to the court’s original decision to deny the preference, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to plaintiff; plaintiff’s motion for a general preference granted; and action remitted to the Trial Term of the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the entry of an order according a proper calendar preference to the action. Appeal from order of September 25, 1962, denying the motion, dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the later order of November 7, 1962. Plaintiff, a resident of Queens County, was injured on April 24, 1961 in New York County as a result of the negligence of defendant, a resident of Nassau County. Plaintiff commenced his action in the Supreme Court, Queens County, on October 17, 1961. Issue was joined on December 26, 1961, and a note of issue was filed for the September 1962 Term. In our opinion the Special Rule of this court (art. Ill) regulating the granting of preferences in negligence actions, effective March 1,1962, which rescinded rule IX of the Trial Term Rules of the Supreme Court, Queens County, and which contains the same provisions as the rescinded rule, was not intended to exclude a case from proceeding in the regular order on the calendar where a plaintiff has brought his action in the Supreme Court for jurisdictional reasons *(Slater*v. Margolin, 13 A D 2d 450). We are further of the opinion: (1) that subdivision a of section 19 of article VI of the Constitution of the State of New York (as amd., eff. Sept. 1, 1962) which *inter alla*authorizes the Supreme Court to transfer any action “to any other court having jurisdiction of the subject matter within the judicial department *545provided that such other court has jurisdiction over the classes of persons named as parties” to such action; and (2) that subdivision (b) of section 7 of the New York" City Civil Court Act, which so far as pertinent provides that the Civil Court shall have jurisdiction of actions for the recovery of money where *“*the cause of action arose within the city of New York and the defendant * * * resides 6 # * within [such] city * * # or the counties of Westchester or Nassau,” are not retroactive in the absence of a clear expression by the Legislature to that effect *(Garza*v. *Maid of Mist Steamboat Go.,*303 N. Y. 516, 522). Nor may this action be transferred to a lower court pursuant to the amended section 110-b of the Civil Practice Act, without the written consent of the parties *(Friedman*v. *Strand,*203 Mise. 170; *Kessler*v. *Rosenberg,*207 Mise. 143). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
### §316. Preserving the Federal Emergency Management Agency

#### (a) Distinct entity

The Agency shall be maintained as a distinct entity within the Department.

#### (b) Reorganization

Section 452 of this title shall not apply to the Agency, including any function or organizational unit of the Agency.

#### (c) Prohibition on changes to missions

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may not substantially or significantly reduce, including through a Joint Task Force established under section 348 of this title, the authorities, responsibilities, or functions of the Agency or the capability of the Agency to perform those missions, authorities, responsibilities,1 except as otherwise specifically provided in an Act enacted after October 4, 2006.

#### (2) Certain transfers prohibited

No asset, function, or mission of the Agency may be diverted to the principal and continuing use of any other organization, unit, or entity of the Department, including a Joint Task Force established under section 348 of this title, except for details or assignments that do not reduce the capability of the Agency to perform its missions.

#### (d) Reprogramming and transfer of funds

In reprogramming or transferring funds, the Secretary shall comply with any applicable provisions of any Act making appropriations for the Department for fiscal year 2007, or any succeeding fiscal year, relating to the reprogramming or transfer of funds.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title V, §506, as added Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §611(13), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1400; amended Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XIX, §1901(d)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2670.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 506 of Pub. L. 107–296 was renumbered section 502 and is classified to section 312 of this title.

#### Amendments

2016—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 114–328, §1901(d)(1)(A), inserted ", including through a Joint Task Force established under section 348 of this title, after "reduce".

Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 114–328, §1901(d)(1)(B), inserted "including a Joint Task Force established under section 348 of this title," after "Department,".

1 So in original. Probably should be "authorities, responsibilities, or functions".
**Exhibit 34.1**

** ** 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Board of Directors of

Public Service Company of New Hampshire

Hartford, Connecticut

 

We have examined management's assertion for the Public ServiceCompany of New Hampshire and subsidiaries (“PSNH” or the “Company”) regarding compliance with the servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB (“Regulation AB”) forthe Rate Reduction Bonds Series 2018-1 (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, excluding criteriaitems 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4 )(iii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix),1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicableto the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. PSNH’s management is responsible for the Company'scompliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company'scompliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standardsof the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and attestation standards established by the American Instituteof Certified Public Accountants, and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform,determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specifiedperiod, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selectedservicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not haveincluded servicing activities related to each item included in the Platform. An examination involves performing procedures to obtainevidence about management’s assertion. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment,including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of management’s assertion, whether due to fraud or error. Webelieve that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examinationdoes not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company compliedwith the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 for the Platform is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Hartford, Connecticut

March 27, 2020
#### HOWELL v. CLYDE

No. 569P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 717

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
Exhibit 15.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8, No.333-111310 and 333-152335) pertaining to the Employees' Stock Option Plans of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. of our reports dated March 11, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013.




Tel-Aviv, Israel
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERERMarch 11, 2014
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
Exhibit
  32.1


Certification
  of Glen L. Shank 
  President and Chairman of the Board 
  of 
  Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.

I,
Glen L. Shank, President and Chairman of the Board of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc., hereby
certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (a) | The Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 2004, which accompanies
      this certification, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) | The information
      contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August
      1, 2004, which accompanies this certification, fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duckwall-ALCO
      Stores, Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | By: | /s/ Glen L. Shank                  
| | --- | -----------------------------------
| |     |                                    
| |     | Glen L. Shank                      
| |     | President and Chairman of the Board

Dated:   September 9, 2004



| |  | 
| |  | 

---
§ 553.14 Eligibility for interment of cremated remains in the Arlington National Cemetery Unmarked Area. ( a ) The cremated remains of any person eligible for interment in Arlington National Cemetery as described in § 553.12 may be interred in the designated Arlington National Cemetery Unmarked Area.
( b ) Cremated remains must be interred in a biodegradable container or placed directly into the ground without a container. Cremated remains are not authorized to be scattered at this site or at any location within Arlington National Cemetery.
( c ) There will be no headstone or marker for any person choosing this method of interment. A permanent register will be maintained by the Executive Director.
( d ) Consistent with the one-gravesite-per-family policy, once a person is interred in the Unmarked Area, any derivatively eligible persons and spouses must be interred in this manner. This includes spouses who are also primarily eligible persons. No additional gravesite, niche, or memorial marker in a memorial area will be authorized.
§ 552.92 Group permit procedures. ( a ) A collective permit will be issued to an organization desiring to conduct a group event. The group leader must register in person at the Ft. Lewis Area Access Section, Bldg T-6127, and must be 21 years of age or older except for active duty military personnel.
( b ) Group registration requires the information listed in § 552.91, except that a legible list of names of all persons in the group is required in lieu of the names and ages of minors.
( c ) Group permits will be issued with the requirement that all members of the group will be with the leader throughout the event. If the group plans to separate while still on post, sub-group leaders must be appointed and must each obtain a permit as noted in this section. The group leader permit is not transferable.
( d ) Other group write-in requests may be authorized for extraordinary circumstances.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Davidson
Diversified Real Estate LP 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768598
<NAME> DAVIDSON DIVERSIFIED REAL ESTATE LP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             655
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       20
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          23,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         12,112
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,782
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,709
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,745
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,084
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        42
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 37.1300 In-kind contributions.

The value of non-cash contributions made by a recipient or non-Federal third parties toward cost sharing.
Exhibit 11

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.

                  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SECURITY

                      (in thousands, except per share data)



                                                                For the Nine
                                                                Months Ended
                                                               September 30,
                                                                    2003
                                                                (unaudited)
                                                               -------------

Net income                                                       $   18,342
Less:  preferred securities dividend requirement                     19,345
                                                                  ---------

Net loss applicable to common securities                         $   (1,003)
                                                                  ----------

Securities:
Weighted average number of common securities outstanding             53,011
                                                                  ----------
Net loss per common security                                     $   (18.92)
                                                                  ----------
EXHIBIT 4.1


    
      Exhibit
        4.1

       

       

      CORONADO
        INDUSTRIES, INC.

      16857
        E. Saguaro Boulevard

      Fountain
        Hills, AZ 85268

      


      April
        1,
        2006

      


      Coronado
        Employees and Consultants, 

      


      The
        Company’s Board of Directors has decided to make available to all employees and
        consultants, shares of the Company’s common stock
        at
        a negotiated price of not less than 90% of the lowest closing trading price
        during the week prior to the compensation being due.

      


      To
        participate in this program, all you have to do is execute this letter in
        the
        space below, and indicate the amount of wages you wish to
        have
        allocated to this Plan and the pay period from which your salary will be
        credited. Your free-trading shares will be delivered to
        you
        within a few days.

       

      
         

        
          	 	 	 
	 	CORONADO
                  INDUSTRIES, INC.
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	/s/ 
                  Gary R. Smith
	 	
                  

                
	 	Gary
                  R. Smith, President


        

      

       

      
        


      

      
        	
                

              	 	
                

              
	Amount of Compensation	 	Employee/Consultant
                Signature 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
                

              	 	
                

              
	Period From 	 	
                Name
                  of Employee/Consultant 

              
	Which To Be Paid 	 	
                (Please
                  Print)
### §1575. False advertising

It shall be unlawful for any person to disseminate, or cause to be disseminated, any false advertisement concerning seed, by the United States mails, or in interstate or foreign commerce, in any manner or by any means, including radio broadcasts: Provided, however, That no person, advertising agency, or medium for the dissemination of advertising, except the person who transported, delivered for transportation, sold, or offered for sale seed to which the false advertisement relates, shall be liable under this section by reason of disseminating or causing to be disseminated any false advertisement, unless he or it has refused, on the request of the Secretary of Agriculture, to furnish the Secretary the name and post-office address of the person, or advertising agency, residing in the United States, who caused, directly or indirectly, the dissemination of such advertisement.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title II, §205, 53 Stat. 1282.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

See section 1610 of this title.
§ 1605.1 Director of Selective Service. The Director of Selective Service shall be responsible directly to the President. The Director of Selective Service is hereby authorized and directed: ( a ) To prescribe such rules and regulations as he shall deem necessary for the administration of the Selective Service System, the conduct of its officers and employees, the distribution and performance of its business, and the custody, use, and preservation of its records, papers, and property.
( b ) To issue such public notices, orders, and instructions, as shall be necessary for carrying out the functions of the Selective Service System.
( c ) To obligate and authorize expenditures from funds appropriated for carrying out the functions of the Selective Service System.
( d ) To appoint and to fix, in accordance with provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5 U.S.C., relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates, the compensation of such officers, agents, and employees as shall be necessary for carrying out the functions of the Selective Service System.
( e ) To procure such space as he may deem necessary for carrying out the functions of the Selective Service System by lease pursuant to existing statutes.
( f ) To obtain by purchase, loan, or gift such equipment, supplies, printing, binding, and blankbook work for the Selective Service System as he may deem necessary to carry out the functions of the Selective Service System.
( g ) To perform such other duties as shall be required of him under the Selective Service Law or which may be delegated to him by the President.
( h ) To delegate any of his authority to such officers, agents, or persons as he may designate and to provide for the subdelegation of any such authority.
### §4705. Regulations

The Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations to carry out the purpose of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title VI, §601(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1188, §4706; renumbered §4705, Pub. L. 105–362, title XIII, §1302(b)(2)(B)(i), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3293.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4705, added Pub. L. 95–454, title VI, §601(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1188, required annual report on research programs and demonstration projects, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–362, title XIII, §1302(b)(2)(B)(i), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3293.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1101 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1609

ESTHER KINOBE MPUNGU NAKAGIRI,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, 

Maryland, for Petitioner. Joyce R. Branda, Acting Assistant 

Attorney General, Jennifer L. Lightbody, Senior Litigation 

Counsel, Andrea N. Gevas, Office of Immigration Litigation,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Esther Kinobe Mpungu Nakagiri, a native and citizen of 

Uganda, petitions for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the 

immigration judge’s order denying her motion to reopen. We have 

thoroughly reviewed the record, including the relevant orders, 

Nakagiri’s affidavit, and the various supporting exhibits, and 

conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS 

v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323–24 (1992); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 

F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009); Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 

747 (4th Cir. 2006); see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(3) (2014). 

Further, we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision not 

to sua sponte reopen Nakagiri’s removal proceedings. Mosere, 

552 F.3d at 400–01. Accordingly, we deny the petition for 

review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Nakagiri

(B.I.A. May 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED