alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,622
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,835
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,540
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,377
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,510
<SALES>                                         37,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,224
<CGS>                                           30,197
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,015)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (370)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,420)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.55)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21  SUBSIDIARIES OF SECURITY
CAPITAL CORPORATION  NAME
  
  JURISDICTION
  OFINCORPORATIONSecurity Capital Insurance Group, Inc.
  
  DelawarePossible Dreams, Ltd.
  
  DelawareP.D. Holdings, Inc.
  
  DelawarePumpkin Masters Holdings, Inc.
  
  DelawarePumpkin, Ltd.
  
  DelawarePrimrose Holdings, Inc.
  
  DelawarePrimrose School Franchising Company
  
  GeorgiaThe Jewel I, Inc.
  
  GeorgiaPS-Bentwater, Inc.
  
  GeorgiaWC Holdings, Inc.
  
  DelawareWC Holdings, Inc.
  
  DelawareCompManagement, Inc.
  
  OhioCompManagement Disability Services Company
  
  VirginiaCompManagement Health Systems, Inc.
  
  OhioCompManagement of Virginia, Inc.
  
  VirginiaM&N Risk Management, Inc.
  
  OhioCMI Management Company
  
  OhioCMI Barron Risk Management Services, Inc.
  
  TexasOctagon Risk Services, Inc.
  
  California
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 1350 Certification of the**

**Chief Executive Officer**

I, James R. Bazet, the Chief Executive Officer of CobraElectronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CobraElectronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form  S-3(Nos. 333-74442, 333-63190, 333-38578, 333-34412, 333-31983, 333-37678,333-03719, 333-71457, 333-52973) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 333-107831, 333-59780, 333-53051) of SEDONA Corporation and itssubsidiary of our report dated April 15, 2010, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of SEDONA Corporation and its subsidiary as of December 31,2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended, which appears inthe December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of SEDONACorporation and its subsidiary.

 

 
|   | /s/ ASHER &  COMPANY, Ltd. |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

 

**Philadelphia, Pennsylvania**

**April 15, 2010**

 

----
§ 37.840 What general approach should I take in negotiating data and patent rights? ( a ) You should confer with program officials and legal counsel to develop an overall strategy for intellectual property that takes into account inventions and data that may result from the project and future needs the Government may have for rights in them. The strategy should take into account any intellectual property the Government is furnishing and any pre-existing proprietary information that the recipient is furnishing, as well as data and inventions that may be generated under the award (recognizing that new data and inventions may be less valuable without pre-existing information). All pre-existing intellectual property, both the Government's and the recipient's, should be marked to give notice of its status.
( b ) Because TIAs entail substantial cost sharing by recipients, you must use discretion in negotiating Government rights to data and patentable inventions resulting from research under the agreements. The considerations in §§ 37.845 through 37.875 are intended to serve as guidelines, within which you necessarily have considerable latitude to negotiate provisions appropriate to a wide variety of circumstances that may arise. Your goal should be a good balance between DoD interests in: ( 1 ) Gaining access to the best technologies for defense needs, including technologies available in the commercial marketplace, and promoting commercialization of technologies resulting from the research. Either of these interests may be impeded if you negotiate excessive rights for the Government. One objective of TIAs is to help incorporate defense requirements into the development of what ultimately will be commercially available technologies, an objective that is best served by reducing barriers to commercial firms' participation in the research. In that way, the commercial technology and industrial base can be a source of readily available, reliable, and affordable components, subsystems, computer software, and other technological products and manufacturing processes for military systems.
( 2 ) Providing adequate protection of the Government's investment, which may be weakened if the Government's rights are inadequate. You should consider whether the Government may require access to data or inventions for Governmental purposes, such as a need to develop defense-unique products or processes that the commercial marketplace likely will not address.
§ 516.65 Litigation reports in civil recovery cases. ( a ) All substantiated PFI cases will be evaluated by PFAs to determine whether it is appropriate to recommend civil recovery proceedings.
( b ) Recovery should be considered under both statutory and common law theories, including but not limited to the following: ( 1 ) False Claims Act, 31 USC 3729.
( 2 ) Anti-Kickback Act, 41 USC 51.
( 3 ) Sherman Act, 15 USC 1-7.
( 4 ) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 USC 1961-1968.
( 5 ) Common law fraud.
( 6 ) Unjust enrichment.
( 7 ) Constructive trust.
( 8 ) Cases where contracts have been procured in violation of the conflict of interest statute, 18 USC 218. See *K&R Engineering Co.* v. *United States,* 616 F.2d 469 (Ct. Cl., 1980).
( c ) When civil recovery appears possible, PFD should be consulted to determine if a litigation report is necessary. If requested by PFD, the report should summarize the available evidence and applicable theories of recovery and be prepared under § 516.23 of this part. To avoid unnecessary duplication of effort, recovery reports may include and make liberal references to other reports previously prepared on a given case such as the DFARS 209.406-3 (48 CFR 209.406-3) report.
( d ) The MACOM PFI coordinator and PFA will monitor all civil fraud recovery efforts throughout the command and will provide training and technical assistance as required. Status reports of all civil fraud recovery efforts will be provided through channels as required by PFD.
#### § 37.1110 What other responsibilities related to payments do I have?

If you are the administrative agreements officer, you have the responsibilities described in 32 CFR 22.810(c), regardless of the payment method. You also must ensure that you do not withhold payments, except in one of the circumstances described in 32 CFR 34.12(g).
#### § 37.905 Must I make receipt of the final performance report a condition for final payment?

If a final report is required, your TIA should make receipt of the report a condition for final payment. If the payments are based on payable milestones, the submission and acceptance of the final report by the Government representative will be incorporated as an event that is a prerequisite for one of the payable milestones.
**Exhibit No. 32.2**

**Certification ofCFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Schneider, ExecutiveVice President,**Chief Financial Officer of DRSTechnologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

1)              The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of DRS Technologies, Inc.
| August 9, 2007 | /s/ RICHARD A.  SCHNEIDER                           |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                | Richard A. Schneider                                |
| * *            | *Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIREDBY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRSTECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHEDTO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

----
§ 910.842 Federal inspections. ( a ) Part 842 of this chapter, *Federal Inspections,* shall apply to all exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) The Office will furnish a copy of any inspection report or enforcement action taken to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources upon request.
WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1587
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

PLATE 5
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
MINIDOKA
DAM
i,
9
S.
T.
9
Ss.
wt
PA YY ad!
7 y
/ P / I ad j '
vA re at a ll io) L zs
/ NS 7 ons) 17 on!
\ VA
* 7 ») ra dalg) cbi
\ V \| 7 ©) II dal
E=>\ 7
3 bal
\ Pi
NX , v4
ra
r \
\
of \
q \
10 \
Ss. \
[a
ddl
——
~~
< L
a |
1 = —
I
It —
I
\
\
\
\
x \
\Y
\
)
4
4Y
4 4
4
Y,
ti 7
iy,
ad abl
os
dl
idaho} : |
I
I
ll
I
I
7 4400——--—_ \
"= l|
t | |
t
12> -== | <
s II's
l
I
I
Il
ll
ll
i
= {|
——T
\ ee, Il
|
NS i
: J . =|
X Il
II
II
i
i
I
ll
ll
|
as I
S
Pin | = ey i
T ve < rae 4 T
13 ss S8asSS=pSaS4====—===5 13
* Z AD (ie a :
L—
pabel
poe?! |
4560
EXPLANATION Obal
aacl
4500— — cal a
Contour see
Dashed where approximately located eel
WATER-TABLE WELLS bbi~—458C
5 1a 6) ad!
© Aes
Irrigation or publie-supply, drilled aa\ \ eo! bd2ac
jad3
(44600 —
° <n, Te
Domestic and stock, drilled q
5 ce 5
T 2 co? ED ~ _ E
14 Destroyed, drilled 4 at ccl_ {Ul ccl— | =
Ss. ‘620. Ss.
1}
Irrigation or public-supply, dug
Oo
Domestic and stock, dug
Destroyed, dug
FLOWING ARTESIAN WELLS
© EIGHTMILE
Irrigation or public-supply, drilled
e
Domestic and stock, drilled >a
CANA,
NONFLOWING ARTESIAN WELLS a a
1O}
Irrigation or public-supply, drilled
oe
Domestie and stock, drilled
1
Sy Il
Tickon any well symbol indicates project !
observation well \| T
% = i 15
15 Stream-measuring station \I S
Ss. y
” l
Letters and numeral indicate well number. See text I
for explanation of well-numbering system lI
173° \|
J ik I
/ Ly | |
"lg IL
As : Ps i
ECLINATION. 1561 \
sx. : :
[ Ss. oll ofl I
a ; % he ==-4 ll
wes
NS SSE Ke X Peat N I
Ly Tre —Norrows_ PN \ I I
\ \ ! I
\ i i
\w 4 ! i
\ cal I I
 \ \G I |
\ \ ll | . oe!
4
= \ NAN \ i
= N\ \ \ \eal,. I
2 | \ \ <j :
| \ =
‘ a = Sy 16
16 V / I 2
s ah] NY | h
°
N \ i. I i
aaa wa a JL tt
Peal L ———— U__saal
ba 27 (@ | \ v bat] Bey Strevell =
gb Ss = Se eo an : Sy
° dd
Y,
Man wort | of IDAHO "9 JL dessin co LT NJ
SE - -t = = aie = UTAH R 27 E. R. 28 E.
R. 25 €. R. 26 € Hydrology by R. L. Nace, 1957
Base from Idaho Department of Highways

county map of Cassia County

WATER-TABLE CONTOURS IN THE RAFT RIVER VALLEY AND
NORTHERN PLAINS SECTION, OCTOBER-NOVEMBER 1952

593525 © - 61 (In pocket)
i 5 : 2 & 4 MILES
‘eye Be eh, 1 1 1 J

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET EXCEPT WHERE INDICATED
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Shuttle inflatable training articlesThe design, development, construction, and testing of the Long Duration Exposure Facility inflatable and the space telescope training articles are discussed. While these articles are of similar nature, materials, and construction, they vary in size and present different problems with regards to size, shape, gross/net lift, and balance.Document ID19840012550Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWest, M. L.*(Raven Industries, Inc. Sioux Falls, SD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateFebruary 20, 1984Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberR0184-002NAS 1.26:171761NASA-CR-171761Accession Number84N20618Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-16854Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840012550.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 99.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                            SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viskase
Companies, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, I, F. Edward Gustafson,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Viskase Companies, Inc.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:

(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viskase Companies, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Viskase Companies, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Viskase Companies, Inc.


Date:  May 15, 2003


                             /s/ F. Edward Gustafson
                             -----------------------------------------------
                             F. Edward Gustafson
                             Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.3



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Duquesne Light Company (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Morgan K. OBrien, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 10thday of May, 2004.



/s/ Morgan K. OBrienMorgan K. OBrien President and Chief Executive Officer




This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original
of this certification required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company, who will retain it and furnish a copy to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



37
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00612-CR

David Rivera CORTEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR5189

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 17, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

On February 1, 2021, the court ordered appellant, David Rivera Cortez, to show cause why 

this appeal should not be dismissed. On February 4, 2021, Cortez’s appointed counsel filed a 

response conceding that the trial court (1) ruled on no written motions before it took the parties’ 

negotiated plea agreement under advisement on March 2, 2020; (2) later followed this plea 

agreement on November 13, 2020; and (3) has since steadfastly refused to grant appellant any 
04-20-00612-CR

- 2 -

permission to appeal. Therefore, counsel agreed “this Court has little choice but to dismiss the 

instant attempted appeal.” Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
### §1433e. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §281(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3233

Section, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title IV, §426, as added Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, title XI, §1132(a), 104 Stat. 3512; amended Dec. 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–237, title I, §113(12), 105 Stat. 1838, related to appeals from determinations by State and county committees under Agricultural Act of 1949 and other Acts administered by Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. See section 6991 et seq. of this title.
§ 536.24 Delegation of investigative responsibility. ( a ) *Area Claims Office.* An ACO is authorized to carry out its investigative responsibility as follows: ( 1 ) At the request of the area claims authority, commanders and heads of Army and DOD units, activities, or components will appoint a commissioned, warrant, or noncommissioned officer or a qualified civilian employee to investigate a claims incident in the manner set forth in DA Pam 27-162 and this part. An ACO will direct such investigation to the extent deemed necessary.
( 2 ) CPOs are responsible for investigating claims incidents arising out of the activities and operations of their command or agency. An ACO may assign area jurisdiction to a CPO after coordination with the appropriate commander to investigate claims incidents arising in the ACO's designated geographic area. (See § 536.3(f).)
( 3 ) Claims incidents involving patients arising from treatment by a health care provider in an Army medical treatment facility (MTF), including providers defined in 536.23(b)(4)(ii), will be investigated by a claims judge advocate (CJA), medical claims judge advocate (MCJA), or claims attorney rather than by a unit claims officer.
( 4 ) An ACO will publish and distribute a claims directive to all DOD and Army installations and activities including active, Army Reserve, and ARNG units as well as units located on the post at which the ACO is located. The directive will outline each installations' and activities' claims responsibilities. It will institute a serious claims incident reporting system.
( b ) *Command claims service responsibility.* A command claims service is responsible for the investigation and processing of claims incidents arising in its geographic area of responsibility or for any incidents within the authority of any foreign claims commission (FCC) it appoints. This responsibility will be carried out by an ACO or a CPO to the extent possible. A command claims service will publish a claims directive outlining the geographic areas of claims investigative responsibilities of each of its installations and activities, requiring each ACO or CPO to report all serious claims incidents directly to the Commander USARCS.
( c ) *USARCS responsibility.* USARCS exercises technical supervision over all claims offices, providing guidance on specific cases throughout the claims process, including the method of investigation. Where indicated, USARCS may investigate a claims incident that normally falls within a command claims services', an ACO's, or a CPO's jurisdiction. USARCS typically acts through an area action officer (AAO) who is assigned as the primary point of contact with command claims services, ACOs or CPOs within a given geographic area. In areas outside the United States and its commonwealths, territories and possessions, where there is no command claims service or ACO, USARCS is responsible for investigation and for appointment of FCCs.
Note to § 536.24 :
See the parallel discussion at DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-3.
Population by Race Number Percent

Population by Sex Number Percent

Population by Age Number Percent

Households by Tenure Number Percent

Owner Occupied

Renter Occupied

Data Note: Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. Hispanic population can be of any race. 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1.

Total

Population Reporting Two or More Races

Pacific Islander

Other Race Alone

Male

Female

Two or More Races Alone

Non-Hispanic Asian Alone

Age 18+

Age 65+

Age 0-17

Age 0-4

Population Density (per sq. mile)

Minority Population

% Minority

Summary

Population

Some Other Race

White

Black

Pacific Islander Alone

White Alone

Black Alone

American Indian Alone

Total Hispanic Population

Total Non-Hispanic Population

American Indian

Asian

Census 2010

EJSCREEN Census 2010 Summary Report

Population Reporting One Race

Total

Households

Housing Units

Land Area (sq. miles)

% Land Area

Water Area (sq. miles)

% Water Area

Location:

Ring (buffer):

Description:

1/1

User-specified point center at 36.903135, -111.390242 9-mile radius SRP - Navajo Generating Station 8,89936 4,871 55% 2,897 3,240 249.24 99%3.67 1% 8,899 8,486 95% 4,289 48% 27 0% 3,943 44% 70 1% 3 0% 154 2% 413 5% 558 6% 8,341 94% 4,028 45% 27 0% 3,865 43% 63 1% 3 0% 12 0% 343 4% 4,471 50% 4,428 50% 744 8% 2,686 30% 6,213 70% 773 9% 2,897 2,089 72% 808 28%