alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-546
In Re: ROBERT LEE DAVIS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-96-896-H) Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Davis, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Lee Davis has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in this court seeking to reverse the district court's order denying his second petition for habeas corpus relief, under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and a motion for reconsideration of that order. The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy which should only be used in extraordinary situations. In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Petitioner must show that he has a clear right to the relief sought, that the respondent has a clear duty to perform the act requested by petitioner, and that there is no other adequate remedy available. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Durham , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Davis has failed to make the requisite showing for such extraordinary relief. Our review of the district court record discloses that the district court denied Davis' second habeas petition because he was no longer in custody. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(a). We therefore deny his petition for writ of mandamus and deny his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Average Hourly Earnings in the Explosives Industry, June 1944

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Average Hourly Earnings in the Explosives Industry, June 1944 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 819*,												Washington, D.C: 								For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4294,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### Part J—Secure Handling of Ammonium Nitrate
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Appellant, and Robert A. McKelvey, Respondent.

In a special proceeding by the MVAIC to stay arbitration of a claim for personal injury asserted against it by the respondent Robert A. McKelvey pursuant to statute (Insurance Law, § 167, subd. 2-a; § 600 *et seq.),*the MVAIC appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 22, 1963, which granted the respondent’s motion to set aside as “contrary to the weight of evidence ” the jury’s verdict that physical contact had not occurred between respondent’s vehicle and an unknown vehicle, after a trial of such *686preliminary issue; and which directed a new trial upon the issue. Order reversed, without costs; respondent’s motion denied; verdict reinstated, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for further action not inconsistent herewith. In our opinion, under all the circumstances, a jury question was fairly presented as to whether contact had occurred between the respondent’s vehicle and an unknown vehicle; hence, it was an abuse of discretion to set aside the jury’s verdict. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, J'J., concur.
### §803. Special rule on statutory, regulatory, and judicial deadlines

(a) In the case of any deadline for, relating to, or involving any rule which does not take effect (or the effectiveness of which is terminated) because of enactment of a joint resolution under section 802, that deadline is extended until the date 1 year after the date of enactment of the joint resolution. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to affect a deadline merely by reason of the postponement of a rule's effective date under section 801(a).

(b) The term "deadline" means any date certain for fulfilling any obligation or exercising any authority established by or under any Federal statute or regulation, or by or under any court order implementing any Federal statute or regulation.

(Added Pub. L. 104–121, title II, §251, Mar. 29, 1996, 110 Stat. 873.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997             FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997             FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                         271,000                  82,153
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,289,200               2,225,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                   228,200                 192,900
<INVENTORY>                                  9,172,700              10,048,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,705,700              12,502,287
<PP&E>                                       1,307,700               1,294,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                 650,100                 445,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,370,500              13,365,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,518,800               5,092,324
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,084,900               1,084,848
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,766,800               7,188,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,370,500              13,365,369
<SALES>                                     15,486,100              21,239,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,486,100              21,239,507
<CGS>                                        6,274,300               8,396,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,723,000              16,945,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,077,100               1,255,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,000                  60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,400                 344,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,494,600               2,634,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                   988,900               1,004,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,505,700               1,630,088
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,505,700               1,630,088
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28                     .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28                     .31
        

</TABLE>
### §1445b–5. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–624, title XI, §1161(a)(2), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3520

Section, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title I, §107F, as added Dec. 23, 1985, Pub. L. 99–198, title X, §1006, 99 Stat. 1448, related to export certificate programs for 1986 through 1990 crops of wheat and feed grains.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective beginning with 1991 crop of an agricultural commodity, with provision for prior crops, see section 1171 of Pub. L. 101–624, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 1421 of this title.
### §10. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section, acts Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §6(b), 42 Stat. 1001; June 15, 1936, ch. 545, §8(k), 49 Stat. 1499, related to review by Supreme Court on certiorari. See section 1254 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
### §312. Definition

In this subchapter, the term "Nuclear Incident Response Team" means a resource that includes—

(1) those entities of the Department of Energy that perform nuclear or radiological emergency support functions (including accident response, search response, advisory, and technical operations functions), radiation exposure functions at the medical assistance facility known as the Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site (REAC/TS), radiological assistance functions, and related functions; and

(2) those entities of the Environmental Protection Agency that perform such support functions (including radiological emergency response functions) and related functions.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title V, §502, formerly §506, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2214; renumbered §502, Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §611(9), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1395.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 316 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 109–295.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 502 of Pub. L. 107–296 was renumbered section 504 and is classified to section 314 of this title.
### §1632e. Cattle Contracts Library

There is hereby appropriated $1,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2023, for a Cattle Contracts Library pilot program that the Agricultural Marketing Service shall develop and maintain within the Livestock, Poultry, and Grain Market News Division. This program shall be similar, as determined by the Secretary, to the swine contract library the U.S. Department of Agriculture currently maintains pursuant to section 198a of this title. The promulgation of the regulations and administration of this section shall be made without regard to: (1) the notice and comment provisions of section 553 of title 5; and (2) chapter 35 of title 44 (commonly known as the "Paperwork Reduction Act").

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. A, title VII, §779, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2022, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, and not as part of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 which comprises this chapter.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputation of potential flows with embedded vortex rings and applications to helicopter rotor wakesA finite difference scheme for solving the motion of a number of vortex rings is developed. The method is an adaptation of the 'cloud-in-cell' technique to axisymmetric flows, and is thus a combined Eulerian-Lagrangian technique. A straightforward adaptation of the cloud-in-cell scheme to an axisymmetric flow field is shown to introduce a grid dependent self-induced velocity to each vortex ring. To correct this behavior the potential is considered to consist of two parts, a local and a global field. An improved difference formula is derived, allowing the accurate calculation of the potential at points near vortex locations. The local potential is then subtracted before calculating the velocity, leaving only the influences of the remaining vortices. The correct self-induced velocity is then explicitly added to the vortex velocity. Calculations of the motion of one and two vortex rings are performed, demonstrating the ability of the new method to eliminate the grid dependence of the self-induced velocity. The application of the method to the calculation of helicopter rotor flows in hover is attempted.Document ID19840009458Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRoberts, T. W.*(Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1983Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-166542CFDL-TR-83-5NAS 1.26:166542Accession Number84N17526Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NGT-22-009-901CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG2-105Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840009458.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §138c. Samples

#### (a) Performance evaluation samples

#### (1) Provided by Secretary

The Secretary shall ensure that performance evaluation samples are provided to any laboratory that has applied for accreditation under this chapter.

#### (2) Analysis by laboratory

A laboratory described in paragraph (1) shall analyze such performance evaluation samples and submit the results of such analysis to the Secretary, as provided for in section 138a of this title.

#### (3) Testing methods

Samples shall be tested by the laboratory according to methods specifically approved for such purpose by alternate methods of demonstrated adequacy or equivalence, as determined in regulations established under this chapter.

#### (b) Results of testing

#### (1) Submission of results

The laboratory shall submit the results of the tests conducted under subsection (a) to the Secretary on forms provided by the Secretary, on or before the date determined by the Secretary.

#### (2) Evaluation of tests

The Secretary shall evaluate the results of such tests achieved by the laboratory and shall determine whether such laboratory is capable of undertaking an accurate analysis of chemical residues in agricultural products.

#### (c) Review of accreditation

The Secretary shall ensure that performance evaluation samples for analysis are provided to laboratories accredited under this chapter not less than two times a year.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIII, §1324, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3564.)
§ 537.13 Enforcement of assertions. Meritorious assertions that do not result in collections should be enforced as follows: ( a ) Where the debtor is a business or corporation otherwise financially capable the RJA or equivalent should forward a recommendation to bring suit or intervene in an existing suit regardless of the amount of the debt. As authorized by 28 U.S.C. 3011, the demand amount in the complaint shall include an additional 10% of the original claimed amount, to cover the administrative costs of processing and handling the enforcement of the debt.
( b ) Where the debtor is an individual rather than a business, an asset determination should be made both as to existing assets or prospective earnings. If the injured party's attorney has made an assets search which is reliable, review the search before requesting a new one. Such a search can be paid for out of existing collections. ( 1 ) If the debtor has assets refer to USARCS for transfer to a debt collection contractor or an agency debt collection center as determined by USARCS.
( 2 ) If the debtor has no assets, but prospective future earnings, RJA may seek a confession of judgment and maintain contact with the debtor for future collection where authorized by state law and filing of suit is not required. If the amount is less then $5,000, enter into an installment payment arrangement.
### §1521. Ineligibility for catastrophic risk and noninsured assistance payments

If the Secretary determines that a person has knowingly adopted a material scheme or device to obtain catastrophic risk, additional coverage, or noninsured assistance benefits under this subchapter to which the person is not entitled, has evaded this subchapter, or has acted with the purposes of evading this subchapter, the person shall be ineligible to receive all benefits applicable to the crop year for which the scheme or device was adopted.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title V, §521, as added Pub. L. 103–354, title I, §114, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3203; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title XII, §§12002(b)(2), 12033(c)(2)(B), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1371, 1405; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XII, §§12002(b)(2), 12033(c)(2)(B), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2133, 2167.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–246, §§12002(b)(2), 12033(c)(2)(B), substituted "this subchapter" for "this chapter" wherever appearing and struck out at end "The authority provided by this section shall be in addition to, and shall not supplant, the authority provided by section 1506(n) of this title."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 13, 1994, and applicable to provision of crop insurance under Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) beginning with 1995 crop year, with such Act, as in effect on the day before Oct. 13, 1994, to continue to apply with respect to 1994 crop year, see section 120 of Pub. L. 103–354, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 1502 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Raymond N. Joeckel, the President and Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Exploration Company, (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 14, 2007



/s/ Raymond N. JoeckelName: Raymond N. JoeckelTitle: President and Chief Financial Officer
| (a)   | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 2, 2008,      which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as      amended; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended October 28, 2007, which accompanies this certification, fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operation of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and  Subsidiaries. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|