alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rose Pearlson et al., Respondents, v. Ethel Javits, Appellant.

In an action by three sisters of the. defendant to impress a trust on certain assets in the defendant’s possession, which are alleged to he properly a part of the estate of their father, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 4, 1962 on the decision of a Special Referee rendered following an inquest taken before said Referee after the defendant’s attorney had withdrawn his appearance and had refused to participate in the trial or to produce the defendant. The judgment granted to the plaintiffs the relief prayed for by them in their second amended complaint. Appeal dismissed, with costs. A judgment resulting from an inquest occasioned by the failure or refusal of a party to appear at the trial is deemed a default judgment from which no appeal lies *(Jensen*v. *Uni-on By. Go.,*260 N. Y. 1, 4; Prashker, New York Practice [4tli eel.], p. 991. Ug'hetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Raibin, JJ., concur.
### §763a. Training for Federal Government, foreign governments, or private entities

In fiscal year 2013 and thereafter: (a) the Center for Domestic Preparedness may provide training to emergency response providers from the Federal Government, foreign governments, or private entities, if the Center for Domestic Preparedness is reimbursed for the cost of such training, and any reimbursement under this subsection shall be credited to the account from which the expenditure being reimbursed was made and shall be available, without fiscal year limitation, for the purposes for which amounts in the account may be expended; (b) the head of the Center for Domestic Preparedness shall ensure that any training provided under (a) does not interfere with the primary mission of the Center to train State and local emergency response providers; and (c) subject to (b), nothing in (a) prohibits the Center for Domestic Preparedness from providing training to employees of the Federal Emergency Management Agency in existing chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosives, mass casualty, and medical surge courses pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4103 without reimbursement for the cost of such training.

(Pub. L. 113–6, div. D, title III, Mar. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 359.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2013, and not as part of the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 which comprises this chapter.
Amendment 1 dated March 29, 2006 to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.9 
 AMENDMENT 1 
 This Amendment 1, dated March 29, 2006 is an amendment to the EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”), dated June 14, 2004 by and between ANDREA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION (the “Company”), a New York corporation, and DOUGLAS J. ANDREA (the “Executive”). 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS,
the Company wishes to postpone the executive’s calendar year 2004 and 2005 until such time that the Company has positive cash flows and payment of such bonus would not cause the Company to receive a “going concern” audit opinion for
the Company’s financial statements; 
 WHEREAS, the Executive is in agreement to this postponement for the benefit of the
Company. 
 1. Postponed Bonus Payment 
 Section 1 of Amendment 1 replaces Section 4(b) for the years ending December 31, 2004 and 2005. 
 (a) The Company
shall pay the Executive a bonus of not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) payable when the Company has positive cash flows and such payment would not cause the Company to receive a “going concern” audit opinion for the
Company’s financial statements, as determined by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion. This bonus may be payable in lump sum or over time as determined by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion and consistent with the intent of
the Amendment 1. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. 

 

			
	ANDREA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Gary A. Jones

	Name:	 	Gary A. Jones
	Title:	 	Director
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Louis Libin

	Name:	 	Louis Libin
	Title:	 	Director
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Joseph J. Migliozzi

	Name:	 	Joseph J. Migliozzi
	Title:	 	Director
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jonathan D. Spaet

	Name:	 	Jonathan D. Spaet
	Title:	 	Director
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Douglas J. Andrea

		 	Douglas J. Andrea
**Exhibit 10.18a**

**FIRST AMENDMENT TO**

**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made by and between Constar International Inc. (the “Company”) and Walter Sobon(“Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to an Executive Employment Agreement datedDecember 12, 2005 (the “Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, the Agreement, pursuant to its terms, will terminate onDecember 12, 2008 (the “Termination Date”); 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement inorder to continue Executive’s employment with the Company. 

NOW THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties herebyamend the Agreement, effective as of the date hereof, as follows: 

1. Section 1 is hereby amended with the addition of the followingnew section 1.7 to the end thereof: 

“1.7 “Effective Date” means June 4, 2008, notwithstanding anything herein to thecontrary.” 

2. Section 3 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“The term of employment under this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and, unless earlier terminated under Section 6 below orextended pursuant to the next sentence, shall terminate on the third anniversary of the Effective Date (the “Term of Employment”). The Term of Employment shall automatically be extended, subject to the same terms, conditions andlimitations as provided herein, for an additional one year period on the first anniversary of the Effective Date and on each such anniversary date thereafter unless, not later than 180 days prior to any such anniversary, either party to thisAgreement shall have given notice to the other that the Term of Employment shall not be extended or further extended beyond its then automatically extended term, if any.” 

3. Section 10.5 of the Agreement, the section regarding identification of the Company’s counsel, is deleted in its entirety and replaced withthe following: 

“With a copy to Company’s counsel at: 

Jonathan A. Clark, Esq. 

Pepper Hamilton, LLP 

3000 Two Logan Square 

Eighteenth and Arch Streets 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799” 

4. Exceptas otherwise amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall apply to this Amendment (unless this Amendment specifically amends a particular provision of the Agreement) and the Agreement andthis Amendment shall be construed together and considered one and the same agreement. 

5. This Amendment may be executed in any number ofcounterparts and when so executed, all of such counterparts shall constitute a single instrument binding upon all parties notwithstanding the fact that all parties are not signatory to the original or to the same counterpart. Any and allcounterparts may be executed by facsimile. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company hascaused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative, and Executive has executed this Agreement, in each case on the 4th dayof June, 2008. 

 
**CONSTAR INTERNATIONAL INC.**By: 
/s/ Michael Hoffman

/s/ Walter Sobon
**Walter Sobon**
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the lim ited circumstances set forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 97-50137

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

RUSSELL L GANT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(W-96-CA-477)

July 9, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Russell L. Gant, Texas prisoner # 640934, argues that the

district court erred in dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas

petition as barred by the one-year statute of limitations provided

in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Ac t of 1996-2-

(AEDPA).

After the district court dismissed Gant’s habeas petition,

this court held that a ha beas petition that is filed in the

district court within one year of the passage of AEDPA is timely.

See United States v. Flores

, 135 F.3d 1000, 1005-06 (5th Cir.

1998). Gant filed his petition approximately three months after

the effective date of AEDPA. Accordingly, the district court’s

dismissal of Gant’s habeas petition is VACATED and the case is

REMANDED for further proceedings.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts-Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated December 17,
2002 in the Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (No. 333-100980)
and related Prospectus of Claymore Securities Defined Portfolios, Series 138.

                                                      /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
                                                          GRANT THORNTON LLP

Chicago, Illinois
December 17, 2002
### Part C—Chief Medical Officer
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Paul M. Joeckel, the Secretary/Vice President Operations of Eagle Exploration
Company, (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal  quarter
     ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
     of  Section  13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
     U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated  February 17, 2004
                                          /s/  Paul M. Joeckel
                                          Name: Paul M. Joeckel
                                          Title: Secretary/Vice President
                                                 Operations
```
### §276. Report on improving immigration services

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, not later than 1 year after the effective date of this chapter, shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary and Appropriations of the House of Representatives and of the Senate a report with a plan detailing how the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, after the transfer of functions specified in this part takes effect, will complete efficiently, fairly, and within a reasonable time, the adjudications described in paragraphs (1) through (5) of section 271(b) of this title.

#### (b) Contents

For each type of adjudication to be undertaken by the Director of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, the report shall include the following:

(1) Any potential savings of resources that may be implemented without affecting the quality of the adjudication.

(2) The goal for processing time with respect to the application.

(3) Any statutory modifications with respect to the adjudication that the Secretary considers advisable.

#### (c) Consultation

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Labor, the Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Border Security of the Department, and the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review to determine how to streamline and improve the process for applying for and making adjudications described in section 271(b) of this title and related processes.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §459, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2201.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The effective date of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), is 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Bureau of Border Security, referred to in subsec. (c), changed to Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement by Reorganization Plan Modification for the Department of Homeland Security, eff. Mar. 1, 2003, H. Doc. No. 108–32, 108th Congress, 1st Session, set out as a note under section 542 of this title.
### Part I—Reexamination After Issue, and Contested Proceedings
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Hickory Tech Corporation (HickoryTech) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Duffy, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech. |

 
| /s/ John E. Duffy                      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| John E. Duffy                          |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |
| March 7, 2006                          |

 

1

----
PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1422-C

REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS—
Terranes in Alabama, Georgia, and Tennessee —PLATE 5
Hollyday, E.F., and Hileman, G.E., 1997, Hydrogeologic terranes and potential yield of water to wells in the

APPALACHIAN VALLEY AND PIEDMONT
Valley and Ridge Physiographic Province in the Eastem and Southeastem United States

._ ; VIRGINIA
A TENNESSEE

KENTUCKY VIRGINIA . “ -
| a aw
is 5

=
TENNESSEE f : A es 5
z 2 2 &
e J rj /- =

o. > 5 < ‘\ : y st. ee A é

, | eae f 7 aS 5

q me Of) + . s

pe yy s

" 4 p y j ( Zz

} - 4
2

EPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
ZOLOGICAL SURVEY

80° 75°
EXPLANATION
Physiographic province MICH,
|| Valley and Ridge
[| Piedmont
oO Blue Ridge and ww . OHIO
New England
Plate area
0°
T
LL. (_IND.
MO.
ARK.
ae
MISS.
Geologic contacts from Hardeman (1966), 1:250,000; Lawton, Marsalis, and others
ALA. GA. Ny (1976), and Osbome and others (1989), 1:500,000; digitized by T.O. Mesko, 1990.
Lambert Conformal Conic projection; Standard parallels 33° and 45°; central meridian -85°
RO
0 100 200 MILES oy ms
LA. <> we
oot io ©
C) 100 200 KILOMETERS: 8 On
GULF OF MEXICO | _
: Ml FLA. , OF

Map showing the Appalachian Valley and Piedmont Regional Aquifer-System Analysis study area,
physiographic provinces, and plate area.

TENNESSEE | NORTH CAROLINA
GEORGIA

TENNESSEE
ALABAMA \ GEORGIA

EXPLANATION

Description of hydrogeologic terranes—The sequence
of units is not intended to imply stratigraphic position.
See plate 1 for stratigraphic position among geologic
units in the hydrogeologic terranes

Dolomite— Includes geologic units that are predominantly dolomite,
a combination of dolomite and sandstone or chert, and dolomite and
limestone with as much as 70 percent limestone

Limestone—Includes geologic units that are predominantly limestone
and limestone with less than 30 percent dolomite

Argillaceous carbonate rock—Includes geologic units that are
predominantly clay-rich dolomite or limestone, as well as shale units
that contain abundant calcite or magnesium calcite

t—— §

pe

Siliciclastic rock—Includes geologic units that are predominantly
shale with little or no carbonate content, claystone, siltstone, sandstone,
and conglomerate that consist of clay minerals, quartz grains, or
siliceous rock fragments

i"
@"

me

(1 OF SB

Undesignated—Includes geologic units that are too varied in lithology
to designate a terrane or are units that are commonly associ:
with the Blue Ridge, Piedmont, or Coastal Plain Physiographic Provinces

10 20 30 MILES

L n

o,°o

T
10 20 30 KILOMETERS

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
DLG data, 1:100,000

‘Sheet prepared and formatted by John S. Harvill and David C. Greene

87°
MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TERRANES IN THE
VALLEY AND RIDGE PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE IN ALABAMA, GEORGIA, AND TENNESSEE

B
E.F. Hollyday aid G.E. Hileman
1997
EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID



### 6041 Spurlock 3

1 5/19/2010 12:11 5/19/2010 2 5/20/2010 6:44 5/20/2010 3 5/20/2010 10:26 5/20/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used



### 15:23 678 Dry Method 26A 

### 9:56 1931 Dry Method 26A 

### 13:39 1390 Dry Method 26A Test End Time Chlorine Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments 

### 2033.58 2700.55 10.9 2027.91 2721.38 10.9 2031.87 2710.13 10.9 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)

### (SCFH)

Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure 

### 12.92 4.43 

### 37609404.48 166.89 235.38 bituminous KLB/HR 12.94 4.41 37899353.13 166.67 232.10 bituminous KLB/HR 12.90 4.46 37815674.83 167.35 229.04 bituminous KLB/HR Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Fuel #2 Fuel #3Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Other Supporting Information Fuel #4
### Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Supporting document to docket# EPA - HQ - OPP - 2014 - 0558 Listing of 7 2 c hemical s ubstances proposed for removal from the currently approved inert ingredient list.CAS Reg. No Chemical Name

1 109 - 89 - 7 Diethylamine 2 78 - 93 - 3 Methyl ethyl ketone 3 109 - 99 - 9 Tetrahydrofuran 4 123 - 92 - 2 1 - Butanol, 3 - methyl - , acetate 5 80 - 62 - 6 Methyl methacrylate 6 100 - 02 - 7 p - Nitrophenol 7 10024 - 97 - 2 Nitrous oxide (N2O) 8 100 - 37 - 8 2 - (Diethylamino)ethanol 9 101 - 68 - 8 4,4 - Methylenedi(phenyl isocyanate) 10 106 - 88 - 7 1,2 - Butylene oxide 11 107 - 18 - 6 Allyl alcohol 12 107 - 19 - 7 Propargyl alcohol 13 108 - 46 - 3 Resorcinol 14 110 - 19 - 0 Isobutyl acetate 15 110 - 80 - 5 Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether 16 112 - 55 - 0 Dodecyl mercaptan 17 117 - 81 - 7 1,2 - Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2 - ethylhexyl) ester 18 117 - 84 - 0 Dioctyl phthalate 19 119 - 61 - 9 Benzophenone 20 121 - 54 - 0 Benzenemethanaminium, N,N - dimethyl - N - (2 - (2 - (4 - (1,1,3,3 - tetramethylbutyl)phenoxy)ethoxy)ethyl) - , chloride 21 123 - 38 - 6 Propionaldehyde 22 124 - 16 - 3 Butoxyethoxypropanol 23 1303 - 86 - 2 Boron oxide (B2O3) 24 1309 - 64 - 4 Antimony trioxide 25 131 - 11 - 3 Dimethyl phthalate 26 131 - 17 - 9 Diallyl phthalate 27 1317 - 95 - 9 Tripoli 28 1319 - 77 - 3 Cresol 29 1321 - 94 - 4 Methyl naphthalene 30 1338 - 24 - 5 Naphthenic acid 31 139 - 13 - 9 Aminotriethanoic acid 32 141 - 32 - 2 Butyl acrylate 33 142 - 71 - 2 Copper acetate 34 149 - 30 - 4 2 - Mercaptobenzothiazole 35 150 - 76 - 5 p - Methoxyphenol 36 150 - 78 - 7 1,4 - Dimethoxybenzene 37 16919 - 19 - 0 Ammonium fluosilicate 38 1762 - 95 - 4 Ammonium thiocyanate39 25013 - 15 - 4 Vinyl toluene

40 25154 - 52 - 3 Nonylphenol 41 2761 - 24 - 2 Amyl triethoxysilane 42 28300 - 74 - 5 Antimony potassium tartrate 43 50 - 00 - 0 Formaldehyde 44 533 - 74 - 4 Dazomet 45 552 - 30 - 7 Trimellitic acid andydride 46 618 - 45 - 1 o - m - p - Isopropylphenols 47 71 - 55 - 6 1,1,1 - Trichloroethane 48 7440 - 37 - 1 Argon 49 74 - 84 - 0 Ethane 50 75 - 43 - 4 Dichloromonofluoromethane 51 75 - 45 - 6 Chlorodifluoromethane 52 75 - 68 - 3 1 - Chloro - 1,1 - difluoroethane 53 75 - 69 - 4 Trichlorofluoromethane 54 75 - 71 - 8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 55 76 - 13 - 1 1,1,2 - Trichloro - 1,2,2 - trifluoroethane 56 7758 - 01 - 2 x Potassium bromate 57 78 - 88 - 6 2,3 - Dichloropropene 58 79 - 11 - 8 Monochloroacetic acid 59 79 - 24 - 3 Nitroethane 60 79 - 34 - 5 1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane 61 8006 - 64 - 2 Turpentine, oil 62 83 - 79 - 4 Rotenone 63 85 - 44 - 9 Phthalic anhydride 64 88 - 12 - 0 N - Vinyl - 2 - pyrrolidone 65 88 - 69 - 7 2 - Isopropylphenol 66 88 - 89 - 1 2,4,6 - Trinitrophenol 67 94 - 36 - 0 Benzoyl peroxide 68 95 - 48 - 7 o - Cresol 69 97 - 63 - 2 2 - Propenoic acid, 2 - methyl - , ethyl ester 70 97 - 88 - 1 Butyl methacrylate 71 98 - 54 - 4 p - tert - Butylphenol 72 99 - 89 - 8 o - m - p - Isopropylphenols
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wages in the Basic Lumber Industry in the Far West, 1944

              																	Baril, Victor S.					,	Prager, Norbert J.					,	Standish, John					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wages in the Basic Lumber Industry in the Far West, 1944 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 840*,												Washington, D.C: 								For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4310,			accessed on September 17, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER