alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM MARCH 31, 1997 AND 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,936,880
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
### §241. Prevention of international child abduction

#### (a) Program established

The Secretary, through the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (referred to in this section as "CBP"), in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, shall establish a program that—

(1) seeks to prevent a child (as defined in section 1204(b)(1) of title 18) from departing from the territory of the United States if a parent or legal guardian of such child presents a court order from a court of competent jurisdiction prohibiting the removal of such child from the United States to a CBP Officer in sufficient time to prevent such departure for the duration of such court order; and

(2) leverages other existing authorities and processes to address the wrongful removal and return of a child.

#### (b) Interagency coordination

#### (1) In general

The Secretary of State shall convene and chair an interagency working group to prevent international parental child abduction. The group shall be composed of presidentially appointed, Senate confirmed officials from—

(A) the Department of State;

(B) the Department of Homeland Security, including U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and

(C) the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

#### (2) Department of Defense

The Secretary of Defense shall designate an official within the Department of Defense—

(A) to coordinate with the Department of State on international child abduction issues; and

(B) to oversee activities designed to prevent or resolve international child abduction cases relating to active duty military service members.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §433, as added Pub. L. 113–150, title III, §301(a), Aug. 8, 2014, 128 Stat. 1822.)
<TABLE>

EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

EDISON BROTHERS STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

<CAPTION>
                                                                  
                                    13 Weeks Ended      39 Weeks Ended
                                                         
                                    Nov. 2, Oct 28,     Nov. 2, Oct 28,
                                    1996    1995         1996   1995
                                   (In thousands, except per share data)
                                                         
<S>                                 <C>      <C>        <C>      <C> 
Loss from continuing operations     $(11,460)$(83,240) $(54,350)$(115,378)
Preferred stock dividends                                              (2)
Net Loss applicable to common stock $(11,460)$(83,240) $(54,350)$(115,380) 
                                                        
SIMPLE AND PRIMARY
Weighted average shares outstanding   22,202   22,087   22,180    22,063
Net effect of dilutive stock options-                             
   based on the treasury method                                          
       TOTAL                          22,202    22,087  22,180    22,063
                                            
Per common share amounts: Simple                        
  Net Loss applicable to common 
       stock                        $  (.52)   $ (3.77) $ (2.45) $ (5.23)
                                                        
Per common share amounts: Primary                       
  Net Loss applicable to common 
       stock                        $  (.52)   $ (3.77) $ (2.45) $ (5.23)
                                                        
FULLY DILUTED                                           
  Weighted average shares 
       outstanding                    22,202   22,087   22,180    22,063
  Net effect of dilutive stock options-                            
    based on the treasury method                                      14 
       TOTAL                          22,202    22,087  22,180    22,077
                                                        
Per common share amounts: Fully Diluted                           
Net Loss applicable to common stock $  (.52)   $ (3.77) $ (2.45) $ (5.23)

</TABLE>
### §§131 to 134. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 131, Pub. L. 107–296, title II, §212, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2150; Pub. L. 114–113, div. N, title II, §204, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2961, which related to definitions, was renumbered section 2222 of Pub. L. 107–296 by Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(2)(H), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4178, and transferred to section 671 of this title.

Section 132, Pub. L. 107–296, title II, §213, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2152, which related to designation of critical infrastructure protection program, was renumbered section 2223 of Pub. L. 107–296 by Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(2)(H), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4178, and transferred to section 672 of this title.

Section 133, Pub. L. 107–296, title II, §214, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2152; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 112–199, title I, §111, Nov. 27, 2012, 126 Stat. 1472, which related to protection of voluntarily shared critical infrastructure information, was renumbered section 2224 of Pub. L. 107–296 by Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(2)(H), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4178, and transferred to section 673 of this title.

Section 134, Pub. L. 107–296, title II, §215, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2155, which prohibited the construction of former part B as creating a private right of action for enforcement of any provision of this chapter, was renumbered section 2225 of Pub. L. 107–296 by Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(2)(H), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4178, and transferred to section 674 of this title.
Faulk, Scott (OST)
From: Sent: To: Subject: Janelle Lani <janellelani@yahoo.com> Monday, November25, 2013 5:53 PM EAS (OST) Mokulele airlines 4 year bid ; ,_,-; -·-( --- .

...)

...., '.**t.~** Aloha, my name is Janelle Lani Tancayo and I'm a resident of Moloka'i and use MokuleleAirlines to fly frequently. I love the idea of Mokulele Airlines 4year bid to link Kalaupapa to the rest ofthe islands'. Ifeel it's a great idea. Mokulele has been in the business for quite sometime now. They are the on-time airlines. Very dependable with a very friendly staff. It's very importantthatwe have a dependable, stable and affordable airlines servicing Kalaupapa. Please select Mokuleleto service Kalaupapa. Mahala, Janelle Lani Tancayo

1
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 12

- 11775

_____________ D. C. Docket No. 3:09

- cv
- 00077

- TJC

- TEM
GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

versus SHARON K. ELLIOTT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas R. Elliott, deceased , MARY ANN HOOPER, Defendants

- Appellants, WILLIAM ROBERT ELLIOTT,
Defendant.

______________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

______________ (March 1, 2013)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Case: 12-11775 Date Filed: 03/01/2013 Page: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: This appeal involves the determination of whether a farm and ranch insurance policy affords coverage for alleged injuries and damages resulting from the insured’s murder of appellants’ mot her, mutilation and burning of her corpse, and disposi tion of her remains. Appellee Great American Assurance Company (“Great American”) brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration from the district court that it had no duty to defend or in demnify William Robert
Elliott (“Elliott”) for an underlying lawsuit brought against him by his siblings in Florida State Court. The jury returned a verdict against Elliott and awarded damages in excess of $1 million. On appeal, Florida’s District Court of Appeals
ruled Elliott was entitled to a directed verdict on the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim and vacated the damages awarded as to that count. The property damage award was $100,000 for both siblings combined. The siblings each currently hold a final judgment against Elliott in the amount of $284, 191.00.
We review de novo the district court’s i nterpretation of an insurance policy
because it is a matter of law

. Admiral Ins. Co. v. Feit Mgmt. Co. , 321 F.3d 1326, 1328 (11th Cir 2003). We also review de novo the district court’s order granting

sum mary judgment. Penley v. Eslinger , 605 F.3d 843, 848 (11th Cir. 2010).

Case: 12-11775 Date Filed: 03/01/2013 Page: 2 of 33 After reviewing the record, and reading the parties’ briefs, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Great American based upon
its well

- reasoned order fi led on March 6, 2012.
AFFIRMED. Case: 12-11775 Date Filed: 03/01/2013 Page: 3 of 3
Webinar Attendees: The Package Terminal Air Conditioning and Package Terminal Heat Pumps Standards Meeting

Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Email

Bauman, Jeff Engineering Project 

Manager

Continental Refrigerator 539 Dunksferry Road Bensalem PA 19020 267-525-3256 215-244-9579 jbauman@nrac.com

Buynacek, Brian Engineer Emerson 138 Ashwood Lane Orchard Park NY 14127 937-238-1160 N/A brian.buynacek@emerson.com

Edwards, David N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street, NW Washington DC 20036 N/A N/A david.edwards@navigant.com

Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy 

Coordinator

Appliance Standards Awareness 

Project (ASAP)

529 14th Street NW,

Suite 600

Washington DC 20045 202-507-4034 N/A jmauer@appliance-standards.org

Morin, Jeanne N/A N/A Akerman LLP 750 9th ST NW, Suite 750 Washington DC 20001 N/A N/A jeanne.morin@akerman.com

Noll, Elizabeth Energy Efficiency 

Advocate

Natural Resources Defense Council 

(NRDC)

1152 15th Street, NW, 

Suite 300

Washington DC 20005 202-513-6277 202-289-1060 enoll@nrdc.org

Voogd, Eric N/A IHG 3 Ravinia Dr Atlanta GA 30346 N/A N/A eric.voogd@ihg.com

Whitfield, Greg N/A Selah Energy 453 S Spring St #1128 Los Angeles CA 90013 N/A N/A greg@selahenergy.com

Wilson, Linda Environmental Scientist New York State Office of the Attorney 

General (NYS OAG)

120 Broadway New York NY 10271 212-416-8948 212-416-6007 Linda.Wilson@ag.ny.gov

Woodford, Michael W. Vice President, 

Standards

Air-Conditioning, Heating & 

Refrigeration Institute (AHRI)

2111 Wilson Boulevard,

Suite 500

Arlington VA 22201 703-600-0328 703-528-3816 mwoodford@ahrinet.org

Wuesthoff, Edward Sustainment 

Engineering Manager

Friedrich Air Conditioning Co. 10001 Reunion Place San Antonio TX 78216 N/A N/A ewuesthoff@friedrich.com

Young, Daniel Project Manager Energy Solutions 1610 Harrison Street Oakland CA 94612 510-482-4420 

x 246

510-482-4421 DYoung@energy-solution.com
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 47493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19413]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held on August 30, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, 10th 
floor, MacCracken Room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee Butner, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, 
telephone (202) 267-5093; fax (202) 267-5075; email 
Renee.Butner@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), we are giving notice of a 
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee taking place on August 30, 2012, at the Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, 20591. The 
Agenda includes:
    1. ARAC Restructure
    2. ARAC Tasking: Airman Testing Standards and Training Working 
Group
    3. Status Report from the Rulemaking Prioritization Working Group 
(RPWG)
    4. Status Reports from Assistant Chairs
    5. Remarks from EXCOM members
Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to the space 
available. The FAA will arrange teleconference service for individuals 
wishing to join in by teleconference if we receive notice by August 21. 
Arrangements to participate by teleconference can be made by contacting 
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 
Callers outside the Washington metropolitan area are responsible for 
paying long-distance charges.
    The public must arrange by August 21 to present oral statements at 
the meeting. The public may present written statements to the executive 
committee by providing 25 copies to the Executive Director, or by 
bringing the copies to the meeting.
    If you are in need of assistance or require a reasonable 
accommodation for this meeting, please contact the person listed under 
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 2, 2012.
Lirio Liu,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012-19413 Filed 8-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-03-1999
<CASH>                               32,369
<SECURITIES>                      3,860,402
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3,918,658
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,918,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               118,297
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            608,293
<OTHER-SE>                        3,192,068
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,918,658
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    114,134
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       123,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (8,932)
<INCOME-TAX>                         (2,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         (6,932)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





Date: December 1, 2015








/s/Tony C. McKim


Tony C. McKim


President and Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER IV—GENERAL AUTHORITIES AND REQUIREMENTS
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





In connection with the quarterly report of Educational Development Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  January 14, 2011                                                      By      /s/ Randall W. White


Randall W. White


President and Chief Executive Officer











Date:  January 14, 2011                                                      By     /s/ Marilyn R. Pinney


Controller and Corporate Secretary


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
### **CHAPTER 81—NATIONAL COMMISSION ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY**
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

Order 

October 11, 2019

158098

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 158098

COA: 343551

Wayne CC: 86-006219-FC;

86-006250-FH

ERIC MIGUEL DOWDY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of February 4, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the 

application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals. On order 

of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of 

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

CAVANAGH, J. (concurring).

I concur in the denial of leave to appeal in this case, but write separately to 

highlight particular circumstances I believe should be considered in future Parole Board 

decisions.

In 1987 defendant was sentenced for two second-degree murder convictions to 

terms of 30 to 45 years’ imprisonment, to be served concurrently to each other and 

consecutively to 2-year sentences for two felony-firearm convictions. At that time, 

conventional thinking was that parole would be achieved earlier from a parolable life 

sentence than from the effective 32-year minimum term defendant had received. 

Defendant’s attorney filed a motion for resentencing seeking a parolable life sentence. 

Indeed, defendant had a sentencing agreement to that effect in one of his cases. The trial 

court granted the motion, converting defendant’s sentence to parolable life. 

However, the Parole Board’s practices changed before it considered defendant’s 

case. See Yantus, Sentence Creep: Increasing Penalties in Michigan and the Need for 
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 11, 2019 

p1008

2

Clerk

Sentencing Reform, 47 U Mich J L Reform 645, 690 (Spring 2014) (noting that, 

“[a]lthough many sentencing judges imposed a life sentence before 1992 with the 

assumption that the inmate would be eligible for parole, and presumptively released on 

parole after twelve to twenty years, [after 1992] this was no longer the state’s practice”). 

Thirty-two years later, after his original 32-year minimum sentence would have ended, 

defendant remains in prison. The Parole Board has many factors to weigh in each of its 

decisions, to be sure. But when the Parole Board next considers this case, it might also 

consider that the trial court may have intended this defendant to have been paroled 

already.