alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6654

ALVIN O. WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

APRIL RYDER; DOCTOR REESE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-02-575-7)

Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 6, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin O. Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Eckert Phillips,

Standardsville, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alvin O. Washington appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Washington v. Ryder,

No. CA-02-575-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.4



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Duquesne Light Company (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Stevan R. Schott, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 24th day of March,
2005.



/s/ Stevan R. SchottStevan R. SchottSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Company and will be retained by Duquesne Light Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 15 November 2007 – Sunplus Technology v OHIM – Sun Microsystems
(SUNPLUS)**

**(Case T-38/04)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for figurative mark SUNPLUS – Earlier national word mark SUN – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity between goods – Similarity between marks

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 43-44)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 October 2003 (Case R 642/2000-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Sun Microsystems, Inc. and Sunplus Technology Co. Ltd. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Sunplus Technology Co. Ltd |
| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark SUNPLUS for certain goods in Class 9 – Application No 214346 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | National word and figurative mark SUN for goods in Class 9 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Application dismissed |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Sunplus Technology Co. Ltd to pay the costs. |
1 So.2d 87

#### Succession of BANKER. Intervention of QUINN.

No. 34056.

March 3, 1941.

Charles Mundy, of New Orleans, for appellant.

*231A. W. Spiller, of Hammond, and Allen B. Pierson, of Ponchatoula, for appellee.

PONDER,' Justice.

Valentine Quinn instituted a suit in the district court against Leon Banker seeking to recover damages sustained as a result of assault and battery. From an adverse judgment she appealed devolutively to the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit. During the pendency of the appeal the defendant died on or about October 1, 1935, and W. A. Cobb, the administrator of the defendant’s succession, was made a party to the suit. The appeal was fixed for trial for January 29, 1936, at which time it was continued and reassigned for a hearing for February 3, 1936. After submission the Court of Appeal gave the plaintiff judgment for $98, with legal interest from date of judicial demand, and all costs. The administrator of the defendant’s succession filed an account on January 7, 1936, in the district court which was approved and homologated February 1, 1936, during the pendency of the appeal. The defendant’s succession was composed entirely of personal property and the proceeds derived therefrom with the exception of $30, now in the hands of the administrator, was distributed. On May 18, 1936, Valentine Quinn, through her counsel applied to the district court for the issuance of a rule ordering the administrator and his bondsman to show cause why they should not be condemned in solido to pay her $98, interest and costs, the amount of the judgment rendered by the Court of Appeal, and in the alternative that the administrator be ordered to turn over to her the $30 remaining in his hands. The administrator interposed exceptions of no right or cause of action which were sustained by the lower court. She has appealed devolutively to this court.

Counsel for' the administrator has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction. The amount claimed by the appellant in her main demand for $98 is below the jurisdictional limit of this court and the alternative claim for the distribution of the $30 remaining in the hands of the administrator is likewise below the jurisdictional limit of this court. Under the provisions of Section 10, Article 7 of the Constitution of 1921, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain an appeal where the amount in dispute or the fund to be distributed does not exceed $2,000 exclusive of interest.

The judgment homologating the administrator’s account has become final and the only fund left to be distributed is the $30 now in the hands of the administrator. There is no other fund remaining for distribution. Under such circumstances, the amount remaining in the hands of the administrator for distribution would govern the appellate jurisdiction. Succession of Duran, 34 La.Ann. 585; Succession of McDowell, 35 La.Ann. 1025.

The demands involved herein are below the jurisdictional limit of the Court of Appeal. Section 29, Article 7 of the Constitution of 1921.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.
#### § 552.112 Purpose.

To provide enhanced security for the protection of arms, ammunition, explosives (AA&E) and sensitive items at Fort Lewis.
EXHIBIT 32.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I, Ronald J. Tassinari, President and Chief Executive Officer of American
Vantage Companies (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual period
            ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), to which this certification
            has been made an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated:  April 12, 2006

                                          /s/ Ronald J. Tassinari
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Ronald J. Tassinari,
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer



                                     -101-
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.6 Sasol Limited   Group OUR INTEGRATED VALUE CHAIN Our integrated value chain, centered on our   gas-to-liquids, coal-to-liquids and chemical processes, is at the heart of   our differentiated value proposition. As we are becoming a more   chemicals-biased company, we will continue to leverage off the benefits of   the value chain as well as improve our processes in ways that ensure safe,   reliable and efficient operations with reduced environmental impacts.   GAS-TO-LIQUIDS (GTL) PROCESS Lower-carbon electricity Allows us the capacity   to cumulatively generate up to 70% of our total internal electricity   requirements in South Africa. NATURAL SASOL SLURRY GAS PHASE DISTILLATE   (SASOL SPDTM) PROCESS Low temperature OWN HYDROCARBON FEEDSTOCK   COAL-TO-LIQUIDS (CTL) PROCESS SASOL ADVANCED SYNTHOLTM REACTOR (SASTM) High   temperature COAL CRUDE OIL AND LIQUID FUELS CHEMICALS PROCESS PARAFFIN AND AX   FROM CRUDE OIL ETHANE CRACKER ETHANE Ethylene also sold directly to market.   ETHYLENE W Wax LAB, alcohols LAB PURCHASED FEEDSTOCK Sasol Fixed Bed Dry   Bottom Gasification (Sasol® FBDB) Light hydrocarbons Gas and chemical   components Reforming Wax Light hydrocarbons Gas engine power plant


ideal as a   low-emission, premium grade fuel and as a NATURAL GAS MARKETING AND SELLING   OF PRODUCTS LOWER-CARBON ELECTRICITY Gas-to-power LIQUID FUELS Vehicle fuel   Jet fuel Fuel components Refine and blend Our GTL diesel is of ultra-high   purity and therefore is blend stock for upgrading conventionally derived   diesels. METHANE-RICH AND Energy for factories/homes components Fuel   components Refine and blend In the liquid fuels business, synthetic fuels   components are upgraded and marketed together with conventional fuels   produced in a refinery from crude oil. CHEMICALS (COMMODITY) Polymers Wax   Surfactants Crude oil refinery CHEMICALS (HIGH-VALUE) Alumina Alcohols   Ethoxylates Chemical derivative units Co-products Recovery and beneficiation   Coal gasification produces co-products for recovery and beneficiation. Gas   and chemical Chemical processes Chemical intermediates from the FT process   are separated, purified and, together with conventional chemical raw   materials, converted into a range of final products. Electricity
## Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule

**Public Meeting**

**October 29, 2013**

**Attendee List**

1 M. Asfaw

NAHB

Susan Bodine

Barnes & Thornburg

Alan Ellsworth

National Park Service

Mark Gorman

Northeast

- Midwest Institute

Susan Kirsch

Association of Clean Water Administrators

David LaRo ss

Inside EPA

Theaux M. LeGardeur

Gunpowder Riverkeeper, Waterkeeper Alliance

Karlee Lichtenstein

Arnold B. Porter, LLP

Larissa Liebmann

Potomac Riverkeeper

Brenna Mannion

NACWA

Melissa McCoy

ACWA

Laura Morgan

Van Scoyoc Associates Max Perkins

Van Scoyoc Associates

Jerry Schwartz

American Forest and Paper Association

Judy Sheahan

The U.S. Conference of Mayors

C hris T ait

Anne Arundel County Department of Public

Works

William Telliard

Environmental Consultant
FORM 6-K



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



Washington, D.C. 20549



Report of Foreign Issuer



Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of



Securities Exchange Act of 1934



For the month of September 2006



ABBEY NATIONAL PLC

(Translation of registrant's name into English)



Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regents

Place, London NW1 3AN, England

(Address of principal executive offices)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . .



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Yes . . . . . . . No . . .X. . . .











---







ABBEY NATIONAL PLC

CUSIP # 002920601

NYSE CODE: SXA





Confirmation of Redemption to Holders of

$400,000,000 7.25% Perpetual Callable Subordinated Notes



Abbey National plc hereby confirms that it has given notice in accordance with the terms of its $400,000,000 7.25% Perpetual Callable Subordinated Notes that on October 16, 2006 it will redeem all of its outstanding $400,000,000 7.25% Perpetual Callable Subordinated Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof (in denominations of $25), together with accrued interest payable on October 16, 2006 in the normal manner in the amount of $0.307118 per $25 of principal amount of 7.25% Perpetual Callable Subordinated Notes.





Dated: September 12, 2006



Contacts



|Jo Wainwright (AFM Legal)
|-------------------------

001 44 20 7756 4723



Jon Burgess (Head of Investor Relations)

001 44 20 7756 4182









---













SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



| | ABBEY NATIONAL PLC        
| | --------------------------
| |                           
| | Dated: 12 September 2006  
| | Katy BondAbbey Secretariat
### §198. Definitions

Except as provided in section 198b(a) of this title, in this part:

#### (1) Market

The term "market" means the sale or disposition of swine, pork, or pork products in commerce.

#### (2) Packer

The term "packer" has the meaning given the term in section 1635i of this title.

#### (3) Pork

The term "pork" means the meat of a porcine animal.

#### (4) Pork product

The term "pork product" means a product or byproduct produced or processed in whole or in part from pork.

#### (5) State

The term "State" means each of the 50 States.

#### (6) Swine

The term "swine" means a porcine animal raised to be a feeder pig, raised for seedstock, or raised for slaughter.

#### (7) Type of contract

The term "type of contract" means the classification of contracts or risk management agreements for the purchase of swine by—

(A) the mechanism used to determine the base price for swine committed to a packer, grouped into practicable classifications by the Secretary (including swine or pork market formula purchases, other market formula purchases, and other purchase arrangements); and

(B) the presence or absence of an accrual account or ledger that must be repaid by the producer or packer that receives the benefit of the contract pricing mechanism in relation to negotiated prices.

#### (8) Other terms

Except as provided in this part, a term has the meaning given the term in section 1635a or 1635i of this title.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title II, §221, as added Pub. L. 106–78, title IX, §934(2), Oct. 22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1208.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section by section 942 of Pub. L. 106–78, see Livestock Mandatory Reporting note set out under section 1635 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination Date

Section to terminate Sept. 30, 2023, see section 942 of Pub. L. 106–78, set out in a Livestock Mandatory Reporting note under section 1635 of this title.
#### § 2003.2 Authority (Article II).

ISCAP was established by, and receives its authority from, Executive Order 13526 “Classified National Security Information” (hereafter the “Order”), December 29, 2009, section 5.3(a)(1), and the Order's implementing directives. Section 5.3(c) of the Order directs ISCAP to issue bylaws, rules, and procedures and to publish them in the Federal Register.
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth in 5

TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60167

Summary Calendar

BETTYE D. WEST, Individually and on behalf

of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FIRST ALLMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(2:96-CV-454-PG)

December 23, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bettye West appeals summary judgment in favor of defendant First

Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company on her personal and attempted

class action claims for employee benefits under 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. Our

review of the record, briefs, and controlling precedents persuades that this

appeal is devoid of merit. Accordingly, on the facts as found, authorities cited,
2

and analysis made by the district court in its comprehensive and scholarly

Memorandum Opinion and Order signed and filed on March 3, 1998, the

judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.

First Allmerica has filed a general motion for attorneys fees. We note a

pending motion in the district court for the fees relevant to that court’s

proceedings. Should First Allmerica desire to proceed with its general request

for attorneys fees incurred because of this appeal it may file an appropriate

request therefor, with the clerk of this court, within 15 days of the issuance of

the mandate herein.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7289
ROBERT E. MAYO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-823-JFM) Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert E. Mayo, Appellant Pro Se. Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Mayo v. Smith , No. CA-96-823- JFM (D. Md. July 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1590 

Expressing support for the designation of November 20, 2024, as ‘‘Carbon 

Monoxide Poisoning Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2024 

Mr. KEAN of New Jersey submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of November 20, 

2024, as ‘‘Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas carbon monoxide is an odorless, colorless gas that 

is produced whenever any fuel, such as natural gas, propane, gasoline, oil, kerosene, or charcoal, is burned; 

Whereas, according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, there are over 400 deaths and 20,000 emergency room visits as a result of carbon monoxide poisoning each year; 

Whereas devices that produce carbon monoxide include automobiles, boats, and heating systems; 

Whereas carbon monoxide from these devices may build up 

in enclosed spaces; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1590 IH 

Whereas carbon monoxide is often referred to as the ‘‘silent 

killer’’ because of its odorless or undetectable traits; 

Whereas when people inhale certain amounts of carbon monoxide, the gas enters the bloodstream and prevents the 

intake of oxygen, which may result in death; 

Whereas, on September 2, 2021, Suzan ‘‘Suzie’’ Marie 

Hanna, of Bridgewater Township, New Jersey, tragically 

passed away from carbon monoxide poisoning while driving from her job in Flemington, New Jersey, to her home 

in Bridgewater, New Jersey, due to floodwaters preventing the movement of her automobile; 

Whereas Suzan ‘‘Suzie’’ Marie Hanna graduated from 

Bridgewater Raritan High School and went on to receive 

her associate’s degree in criminal justice from Raritan 

Valley Community College; and 

Whereas the Hanna family, in memory of their daughter, has 

fought to normalize drivers to acquire a Safety Hammer 

for their automobiles to prevent tragedies like Suzie’s 

from happening again and make New Jersey and the rest 

of the United States a safer place: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses support for the designation of ‘‘Carbon Monoxide 

3 Poisoning Awareness Day’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-60491

H. KENNETH LEFOLDT, JR., in his capacity as Trustee for the Natchez 

Regional Medical Center Liquidation Trust, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

DONALD RENTFRO; CHARLES MOCK; WILLIAM HEBURN; LEROY 

WHITE; JOHN SERAFIN; LINDA GODLEY; LIONEL STEPTER; LEE 

MARTIN; WILLIAM ERNST; JENNIFER RUSS, 

 Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:15-CV-96

Before JONES and OWEN, Circuit Judges, and ENGELHARDT,* District 

Judge.

PER CURIAM:∗∗

Natchez Regional Medical Center (“NRMC”) filed for bankruptcy and H. 

Kenneth Lefoldt was appointed Trustee for the liquidation trust. As Trustee, 

 

* Chief District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation ∗∗ Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 16, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-60491 Document: 00514308352 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/16/2018
No. 16-60491

2

Lefoldt brought claims against the former directors and officers of NRMC, 

alleging breaches of their fiduciary duties of care, loyalty, and good faith. The 

district court held that the defendants were immune from suit under the 

Mississippi Tort Claims Act (“MTCA”). We certified this legal issue to the 

Mississippi Supreme Court, which held that the MTCA does not “provide[] the 

exclusive remedy for a public hospital’s bankruptcy trustee who, on behalf of 

the public hospital, sued former officers and directors of that public hospital.” 

In light of this controlling decision, we vacate the district court’s order 

dismissing the case and remand for further proceedings. 

VACATED and REMANDED.

 Case: 16-60491 Document: 00514308352 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/16/2018