alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 37.525 What is my responsibility for determining the value and reasonableness of the recipient's cost sharing contribution? You must: ( a ) Determine that the recipient's cost sharing contributions meet the criteria for cost sharing and determine values for them, in accordance with §§ 37.530 through 37.555. In doing so, you must: ( 1 ) Ensure that there are affirmative statements from any third parties identified as sources of cash contributions.
( 2 ) Include in the award file an evaluation that documents how you determined the values of the recipient's contributions to the funding of the project.
( b ) Judge that the recipient's cost sharing contribution, as a percentage of the total budget, is reasonable. To the maximum extent practicable, the recipient must provide at least half of the costs of the project, in accordance with § 37.215.
### §643. Certification and report to Congress

#### (a) Certification

Not later than 1 year after May 29, 2015, the Secretary shall certify to Congress that all personnel referred to in section 402(a) 1 have successfully completed the training required under that section.

#### (b) Report to Congress

Not later than 1 year after May 29, 2015, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall report to Congress with respect to the overall effectiveness of the program required by this subchapter, the number of cases reported by Department personnel in which human trafficking was suspected, and, of those cases, the number of cases that were confirmed cases of human trafficking.

(Pub. L. 114–22, title IX, §903, May 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 265.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 402(a), referred to in subsec. (a), probably should be a reference to section 902(a), meaning section 902(a) of Pub. L. 114–22, which is classified to section 642(a) of this title. Section 402 of Pub. L. 114–22, which is classified to section 21301 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement, does not contain a subsec. (a) and does not relate to the training of personnel.

This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this title", meaning title IX of Pub. L. 114–22, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title IX to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015, and not as part of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Pediatric and Obstetric Pharmacology and Therapeutics.                    

*Date:*                         January 15, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dianne Hardy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6175, MSC 7892, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1154,                         *dianne.hardy@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 29, 2020. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-29147 Filed 1-4-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
§ 281.4 Policy. It is DoD policy that: ( a ) The claim settlement and advance decision authorities that, by statute or delegation, are vested in the Department of Defense or the Secretary of Defense shall be exercised by the officials designated in this part. The appendix to this part describes the claims included under these functional authorities.
( b ) Claims shall be settled and advance decisions shall be rendered in accordance with pertinent statutes and regulations, and after consideration of other relevant authorities.
#### § 2400.37 Mandatory review.

Except as provided in this paragraph, OSTP shall process mandatory review requests for classified records containing foreign government information in accordance with § 2400.21. The agency that initially received or classified the foreign government information shall be responsible for making a declassification determination after consultation with concerned agencies. If OSTP receives a request for mandatory review and is not the agency that received or classified the foreign government information, it shall refer the request to the appropriate agency for action. Consultation with the foreign originator through appropriate channels may be necessary prior to final action on the request.
#### MANHART et al., Respondents, v. PRINDLE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Action by Moses L. Manhart and another against Albert T. Prindle and another.

PER CURIAM.

Order modified by requiring plaintiffs to pay, as a condition of granting such order, all costs of the action subsequent to the service of the complaint, including costs _ and disbursements of the trial, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements of this appeal.

STOVER, J., not voting.
#### §§ 1699.141-1699.148 [Reserved]
Second Department,

May, 1962

(May 3, 1962)

#### Minnie Siegel, Respondent, v. Isaac Siegel, Appellant. In the Matter of Louis Mishell et al., Respondents, v. Isaac Siegel, Appellant.

In an action for the annulment of a marriage and in a proceeding for the substitution of defendant’s attorney in such action, defendant (the husband, as appellant) moves: (1) to stay execution of the judgment in the action, pending appeal therefrom, insofar as it directs the payment of alimony and counsel fees; and (2) to stay execution of the order in the proceeeding, pending appeal therefrom, insofar as it directs the payment of a balance of $3,750 to attorneys Mishell and Garlock (respondents) for legal services rendered by them to defendant. Motion for stay granted upon condition that defendant continue to pay the sum of $100 a week to plaintiff pending the determination of the appeals; and on the further condition that defendant shall perfect the *787appeals and be ready to argue or submit them at the October Term, beginning October 1, 1962; appeals ordered on the calendar for said term; they will be heard together on one record. Motion by plaintiff (the wife, as respondent) for an additional counsel fee to oppose the defendant’s pending appeal from so much of a judgment in her favor in the annulment action as awarded her alimony and counsel fees, and to oppose the defendant’s pending motion in this court for a stay of such judgment. Motion denied, without prejudice to an application for such additional counsel fee at Special Term, if plaintiff be so advised. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, J J., concur.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1480 

Recognizing Hispanic Restaurant Week and the contributions of Hispanic 

restaurant owners and employees to the restaurant industry. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 

Ms. CARAVEO (for herself, Ms. SALAZAR, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. CISCOMANI, Mr. 

RUIZ, Mr. COSTA, Mr. GALLEGO, Mrs. RAMIREZ, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. 

SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. CORREA, Ms. SALINAS, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. TITUS, and 

Mr. VASQUEZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Hispanic Restaurant Week and the contributions 

of Hispanic restaurant owners and employees to the restaurant industry. 

Whereas Hispanic Restaurant Week is celebrated from September 22, 2024, through October 3, 2024, during the 

national celebration of Hispanic Heritage Month from 

September 15, 2024, through October 15, 2024; 

Whereas, in 2020, the Bureau of Census estimated that 

41,817 owners of accommodation and food service businesses were Hispanic; 

Whereas the restaurant industry plays a significant role in 

the economy of the United States as the second-largest 

private sector employer in the United States; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1480 IH 

Whereas 25.9 percent of workers in the restaurant industry 

are Hispanic; 

Whereas, during the last decade, Hispanic entrepreneurs have 

started small businesses, including restaurants, at a higher rate than any other demographic; 

Whereas, according to a 2023 Latino Entrepreneurship Initiative report published by the Stanford Graduate School 

of Business, during the last decade, Hispanic entrepreneurs have started small businesses, including restaurants, at a higher rate than any other demographic; 

Whereas, of the nearly 5,000,000 Hispanic-owned businesses 

in the United States, the restaurant industry has the second-highest number of Hispanic owners; 

Whereas 8 in 10 restaurant owners started their restaurant 

industry careers in entry-level positions; 

Whereas 63 percent of adults in the United States have 

worked in the restaurant industry, making it ‘‘the Nation’s training ground’’; and 

Whereas the restaurant industry employs more minority managers than any other industry: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) celebrates Hispanic Restaurant Week; and 

3 (2) acknowledges— 

4 (A) the contributions of Hispanic owners 

5 and staff of the restaurant industry to the 

6 United States economy; and 

7 (B) the fact that the restaurant industry 

8 provides restaurant owners, chefs, dishwashers, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1480 IH 

1 and other staff the opportunity to work hard, 

2 persevere, support their families, and live the 

3 American Dream. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
§ 2102.2 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The following regulations set forth procedures whereby individuals may seek and gain access to records concerning themselves and will guide the NSC Staff response to requests under the Privacy Act. In addition, they outline the requirements applicable to the personnel maintaining NSC systems of records.
( b ) These regulations, published pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-579, Section 552a (f) and (k), 5 U.S.C. (hereinafter the Act), advise of procedures whereby an individual can: ( 1 ) Request notification of whether the NSC Staff maintains or has disclosed a record pertaining to him or her in any non-exempt system of records;
( 2 ) Request a copy of such record or an accounting of that disclosure;
( 3 ) Request an amendment to a record; and,
( 4 ) Appeal any initial adverse determination of any request under the Act.
( c ) These regulations also specify those systems of records which the NSC has determined to be exempt from certain provisions of the Act and thus not subject to procedures established by this regulation.
§ 2400.8 Limitations on delegation of original classification authority. ( a ) The Director, OSTP is the only official authorized to delegate original classification authority.
( b ) Delegations of original classification authority shall be held to an absolute minimum.
( c ) Delegations of original classification authority shall be limited to the level of classification required.
( d ) Original classification authority shall not be delegated to OSTP personnel who only quote, restate, extract or paraphrase, or summarize classified information or who only apply classification markings derived from source material or as directed by a classification guide.
( e ) The Executive Director, OSTP, shall maintain a current listing of persons or positions receiving any delegation of original classification authority. If possible, this listing shall be unclassified.
( f ) Original classification authority may not be redelegated.
( g ) *Exceptional Cases.* When an employee, contractor, licensee, or grantee of OSTP that does not have original classification authority originates information believed by that person to require classification, the information shall be protected in a manner consistent with these Regulations as provided in § 2400.6(d) of this part. The information shall be transmitted promptly as provided in these Regulations to the official in OSTP who has appropriate subject matter interest and classification authority with respect to this information. That official shall decide within thirty (30) days whether to classify this information. If the information is not within OSTP's area of classification responsibility, OSTP shall promptly transmit the information to the responsible agency. If it is not clear which agency has classification responsibility for this information, it shall be sent to the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office. The Director shall determine the agency having primary subject matter interest and forward the information, with appropriate recommendations, to that agency for a classification determination.
### SUBCHAPTER I—ADJUSTMENT IN FREIGHT RATES, NEW USES AND MARKETS, AND DISPOSITION OF SURPLUSES
#### § 552.76 Preliminary investigation.

When unauthorized solicitation practices have apparently occurred, an investigating officer will be appointed (Army Regulation 15-6). The investigating officer will gather sworn statements from all interested parties who have any knowledge of the alleged violations.
### SUBCHAPTER III—COMMODITY BENEFITS
### §1448. Price support levels for storable nonbasic agricultural commodities

Without restricting price support to those commodities for which a marketing quota or marketing agreement or order program is in effect, price support shall, insofar as feasible, be made available to producers of any storable nonbasic agricultural commodity for which such a program is in effect and who are complying with such program. The level of such support shall not be in excess of 90 per centum of the parity price of such commodity nor less than the level provided in the following table:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| If the supply percentage as of the beginning of the marketing year is: | The level of support shall be not less than the following percentage of the parity price: |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Not more than 102 | 90 |
| More than 102 but not more than 104 | 89 |
| More than 104 but not more than 106 | 88 |
| More than 106 but not more than 108 | 87 |
| More than 108 but not more than 110 | 86 |
| More than 110 but not more than 112 | 85 |
| More than 112 but not more than 114 | 84 |
| More than 114 but not more than 116 | 83 |
| More than 116 but not more than 118 | 82 |
| More than 118 but not more than 120 | 81 |
| More than 120 but not more than 122 | 80 |
| More than 122 but not more than 124 | 79 |
| More than 124 but not more than 126 | 78 |
| More than 126 but not more than 128 | 77 |
| More than 128 but not more than 130 | 76 |
| More than 130 | 75 |

Provided, That the level of price support may be less than the minimum level provided in the foregoing table if the Secretary, after examination of the availability of funds for mandatory price support programs and consideration of the other factors specified in section 1421(b) of this title, determines that such lower level is desirable and proper.

(Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title III, §302, 63 Stat. 1053.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Inapplicability of Section

Section inapplicable to 2014 through 2018 crops of covered commodities, cotton, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Feb. 7, 2014, through Dec. 31, 2018, see section 9092(b)(9) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2008 through 2012 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning June 18, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2012, see section 8782(b)(9) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2002 through 2007 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning May 13, 2002, through Dec. 31, 2007, see section 7992(b)(9) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 1996 through 2002 crops of loan commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Apr. 4, 1996, and ending Dec. 31, 2002, see section 7301(b)(1)(I) of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         337,606
<SECURITIES>                                   297,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               639,487
<PP&E>                                         272,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                 232,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 674,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,632,998
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,970,762)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   674,421
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,326
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,964)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Educational Development Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, W. Curtis Fossett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date
    
    January 12, 2004
    
    By
    
    /s/ W. Curtis FossettW. Curtis Fossett
Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Vivian Ferentz v. Melvin Ferentz.

Motion for a stay granted only to the extent as stated in the order to show cause, dated March 23, 1962, on condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served, and filed on or before April 19, 1962, with notice of argument for May 1, 1962, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
# C_2008092EN.01004502.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/45

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 1 February 2008 — Nomura Principal Investment and Nomura v Commission

(Case T-430/04) (1)

1

(2008/C 92/89)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 5.2.2005.

1

---
#### WILLIAMS v. SUTTON

No. 458P97

Case below: 124 N.C.App. 673

Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 November 1997.
#### STATE v. SEARLES

No. 597P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 558

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1998.
#### § 552.30 Purpose.

The regulations in §§ 552.30 to 552.39 set forth the authority, policy, responsibility, and procedure for the acquisition of real estate and interests therein, for use for military purposes by the Department of the Army. The regulations of §§ 552.30 to 552.39 do not apply to Civil Works Projects which are under the supervision of the Chief of Engineers.