alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (a)   | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 28, 2007,                which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements                of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                as                amended; and                                                               |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b)   | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the                quarter                ended October 29, 2006, which accompanies this certification, fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results                of                operation of Duckwall-ALCO Stores,                Inc. |

----
### §415d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 415d, comprising section 508 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3107 of this title.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joann Skinner, Appellant, v. Tobin Packing Co., Inc., Albany Packing Division, et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Application to amend the conditional order of dismissal entered herein March 13, 1962. Application granted and time to file and serve record, brief and note of issue extended to August 1, 1962 and appeal to be argued at the September 1962 Term.
#### Carol De Masco, Respondent, v. Cooper’s Express, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Judgment in favor of plaintiff for $25,346.70, unanimously reversed, on the law, and on the facts, the verdict vacated, and a new trial granted, with costs to defendant-appellant, unless plaintiff stipulates *593to accept $15,000 in lieu of the award by verdict in reduction of the judgment, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent, and is affirmed as thus modified, with costs to defendant-appellant. In this personal injury negligence action it is evident that the jury verdict is grossly excessive in its award of damages, and that a verdict in excess of $15,000 is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 31.B** **CERTIFICATION**     I, John R. Sult, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of El Paso Natural Gas Company;     2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this Report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this Report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this Report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. */s/  John    R. Sult*    John R. Sult    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer    and Controller    (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)    El Paso Natural Gas Company     Date: May 7, 2007
Exhibit 13.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Ari Bronshtein, Co-Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: April 13, 2010

/s/ Ari BronshteinAri BronshteinCo-Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
### §1604. Publication

After judgment by the court, or the issuance of a cease and desist order, in any case arising under this chapter, notice thereof shall be given by publication in such manner as may be prescribed in the rules and regulations made and promulgated under this chapter.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 615, title IV, §414, 53 Stat. 1289.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

See section 1610 of this title.
§ 2800.2 Guiding directives. ( a ) Executive Order 12065, June 28, 1978, Subject: National Security Information.
( b ) Information Security Oversight Office, Directive No. 1, October 2, 1978, Subject: National Security Information.
#### In the Matter of Pyro Incinerator & Supply Corp. v. John R. Miles, Doing Business as Structural Enterprises Co.

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellant within 10 days after the entry of the order filed herein, files a duly approved undertaking in the amount of $1,000 conditioned on the payment of the amount of the award of the arbitrator, dated October 18, I960, and interest, in the event the order appealed from is affirmed or the-appeal is dismissed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen J. Ruzika, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Stephen J. Ruzika        
|                        |  | Stephen J. Ruzika            
|                        |  | President and CEO            
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

Note: This certification is being furnished, not filed, as exhibit 32.1
#### In the Matter of Irene Austin, Respondent, v Philip L. Toia, as Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the State of New York, Appellant, et al., Respondents.

(1) Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the State commissioner, dated April 19, 1977, and made after a statutory fair hearing, as affirmed the determination of the local agency, denying the petitioner’s request for an excess fuel allowance and (2) an appeal by the State commissioner, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 13, 1977, as directed the commissioner of the local agency to make an emergency payment to the respondent Long Island Lighting Company in the amount of the arrears in petitioner’s payments to said company, subject to the commissioner’s right of recoupment should it be determined at a future time that the petitioner is not destitute. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements, and said portion of the proceeding dismissed on the merits. A transcript of the fair hearing reveals that the State commissioner’s determination insofar as reviewed, is supported by substantial evidence. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
Termination Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER 
 This TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”)
is made this 30th day of March, 2006 by and among CFCI HOLDINGS, INC., a Virginia corporation (“Parent”),
HOLO ACQUISITION CORP., a Delaware corporation (“Merger Sub”) and CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS,
Parent, the Merger Sub and the Company are parties to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 9, 2006 (the “Merger Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, Parent has informed the Company that the financing condition to its obligation to complete the Merger will not be satisfied; 
 WHEREAS, the Parties have determined to terminate the Merger Agreement; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Termination. The Merger Agreement is hereby terminated pursuant to Section 8.01(a) and shall have no further force and effect. 
 2. Mutual Releases. 
 (a) In consideration of the undertakings set forth herein,
Parent and Merger Sub finally and forever release and discharge the Company (and its officers, directors, shareholders, agents and representatives) from and against any and all legal and equitable claims, demands, actions, suits, damages and
expenses of any and every nature whatsoever arising in any way from the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. 
 (b) In consideration of the undertakings set forth herein, the Company finally and forever releases and discharges Parent and Merger Sub (and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, agents and representatives) from and against
any and all legal and equitable claims, demands, actions, suits, damages and expenses of any and every nature whatsoever arising in any way from the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. 
  

 -1- 








 3. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws
of the State of Illinois, regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflicts of laws. 
 2.
Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts (including by telecopy), each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
 3. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof. This
Agreement supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to such subject matter. 
 [Signature page
follows] 
  

 -2- 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

  

			
	 CFCI HOLDINGS, INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen M. Burns

		 	Stephen M. Burns
		 	President
	
	HOLO ACQUISITION CORP.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen M. Burns

		 	Stephen M. Burns
		 	President
	
	CFC INTERNATIONAL INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Roger F. Hruby

		 	Roger F. Hruby
		 	Chairman


  

 -3-
### §1367. Stay of proceedings and exclusive jurisdiction

The commencement of judicial proceedings under this subpart shall not, unless specifically ordered by the court, operate as a stay of the review committee's determination. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the jurisdiction conferred by this subpart to review the legal validity of a determination made by a review committee pursuant to this subpart shall be exclusive. No court of the United States or of any State shall have jurisdiction to pass upon the legal validity of any such determination except in a proceeding under this subpart.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §367, 52 Stat. 64.)
#### Morris Golding v. Warner D. Orvis.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before August 30, 1962, with notice of argument for September 11, 1962, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P„ J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, Jj.
The Board of Directors
United Solar Systems Corp.:


We consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 15, 2000 except for note
12 which was as of April 4, 2000, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of United Solar Systems Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999
and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the Form 10-Q of Energy
Conversion Devices, Inc. dated May 15, 2000.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Detroit, Michigan
May 15, 2000
### Reconnaissance stratigraphy of the Prichard Formation (middle Proterozoic) and the early development of the Belt Basin, Washington, Idaho, and Montana

By: E. R. Cressman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1490

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000315374
<NAME>                        SONJA BUCKLES
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,276
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                   769
<INVENTORY>                                    30,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               55,143
<PP&E>                                         20,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 71,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,794
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       634
<OTHER-SE>                                     37,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   71,696
<SALES>                                        93,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               93,422
<CGS>                                          65,483
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  65,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7,073)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,934
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            9,254
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9,254
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.39
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ducommun Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
April 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Anthony J. Reardon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joseph P. Bellino, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



By:

/s/    Anthony J. ReardonAnthony J. ReardonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/    Joseph P. BellinoJoseph P. BellinoVice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:
May 3, 2010

The foregoing certification is accompanying the Form 10-Q solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 53.2 Policy. ( a ) *Members of the Armed Forces* (including retired members and members of reserve components). The wearing of the uniform is prohibited under any of the following circumstances: ( 1 ) At any meeting or demonstration which is a function of, or sponsored by an organization, association, movement, group, or combination of persons which the Attorney General of the United States has designated, pursuant to E.O. 10450 as amended, as totalitarian, fascist, communist, or subversive, or as having adopted a policy of advocating or approving the commission of acts of force or violence to deny others their rights under The Constitution of the United States, or as seeking to alter the form of Government of the United States by unconstitutional means.
( 2 ) During or in connection with the furtherance of political activities, private employment or commercial interests, when an inference of official sponsorship for the activity or interest could be drawn.
( 3 ) Except when authorized by competent Service authority, when participating in activities such as public speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, rallies or any public demonstrations (including those pertaining to civil rights), which may imply Service Sanction of the cause for which the demonstration or activity is conducted.
( 4 ) When wearing of the uniform would tend to bring discredit upon the Armed Forces.
( 5 ) When specifically prohibited by regulations of the department concerned.
( b ) *Former members of the Armed Forces.* ( 1 ) Unless qualified under another provision of this part or under the provisions of 10 U.S.C. 772, former members who served honorably during a declared or undeclared war and whose most recent service was terminated under honorable conditions may wear the uniform in the highest grade held during such war service only upon the following occasions and in the course of travel incidents thereto: ( i ) Military funerals, memorial services, weddings, and inaugurals.
( ii ) Parades on national or State holidays; or other parades or ceremonies of a patriotic character in which any active or reserve U.S. military unit is taking part.
( 2 ) Wearing of the uniform or any part thereof at any other time or for any other purpose is prohibited.
( c ) *Medal of Honor holders.* Persons who have been awarded the Medal of Honor may wear the uniform at their pleasure except under the circumstances set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
[35 FR 1236, Jan. 30, 1970]