alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Improved prediction models forPCC pavement performance-related specifications [electronic resource].**
 
pt1|pt2|
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30:00-131, TD 2.30:00-130

Item Number:0982-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001060368

 
July 17, 2018
§ 2400.12 Identification and markings. ( a ) At the time of original classification, the following information shall be shown on the face of all classified documents, or clearly associated with other forms of classified information in a manner appropriate to the medium involved, unless this information itself would reveal a confidential source or relationship not otherwise evident in the document or information: ( 1 ) One of the three classification levels defined in § 2400.6 of this part;
( 2 ) The identity of the original classification authority if other than the person whose name appears as the approving or signing official;
( 3 ) The agency and office of origin; and
( 4 ) The date or event for declassification, or the notation “Originating Agency's Determination Required.”
( b ) Each classified document shall, by marking or other means, indicate which portions are classified, with the applicable classification level, and which portions are not classified. The Director OSTP may, for good cause, grant and revoke waivers of this requirement for specified classes of documents or information. The Director of the Information Security Oversight Office shall be notified of any waivers.
( c ) Marking designations implementing the provisions of Executive Order 12356, including abbreviations, shall conform to the standards prescribed in Directive No. 1 issued by the Information Security Oversight Office.
( d ) Foreign government information shall either retain its original classification or be assigned a United States classification that shall ensure a degree of protection at least equivalent to that required by the entity that furnished the information.
( e ) Information assigned a level of classification under predecessor Executive Orders shall be considered as classified at that level of classification despite the omission of other required markings. Omitted markings may be inserted on a document by the officials specified in § 2400.18 of this part.
AFS

- 13

- 439

- E September 4, 2013

Exemption No. 10782A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 0279

Mr. Mario Cotumaccio

Aviation High School

45

- 30 36 th Street

Long Island

, NY 11101

Dear Mr. Cotumaccio :

This letter is to inform you that we have amended your Exemption No. 10782. It explains the

basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is amending Exemptio n No. 10782, as amended,

for Aviation High School

. That exemption from § 147.36 of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations ( 14 CFR) allows Aviation High School to conduct instruction wi th a

student/instructor ratio greater than the 25 to 1 ratio.

We are amending the current grant of exe mption from § 147.36 to permit Aviation High

School to conduct FAA

- approved mechanic courses in the 12 th year classes with a

student/instructor ratio up to 28 to 1 ration , subject to the condition that Aviation High School

ensures the facilities, instructional equipment, and instructor to student ratio continue to

provide a level of safety equivalent to § 147.36.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10782, as

amended, remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided

by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I have

amended Exemp tion No. 10782

.2

The Effect of Our Decision

The termination date of Exemption No. 10782, as amended, is extended to June 30, 2015,

unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 10782.

Sincerely

,

/s/

John Ba n bago llo

Acting Deputy Director , Flight

Standards Service
#### § 21.315 May DoD Components issue supplemental policies and procedures to implement the DoDGARs?

Yes, Heads of DoD Components or their designees may issue regulations, procedures, or instructions to implement the DGARS or supplement the DoDGARs to satisfy needs that are specific to the DoD Component, as long as the regulations, procedures, or instructions do not impose additional costs or administrative burdens on recipients or potential recipients.
#### STATE v. WILSON

No. 579P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 757

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss petition for discretionary review denied 5 February 1998.
### Part B—U.S. Customs and Border Protection

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 114–125, title VIII, §802(g)(1)(B)(iii)(I), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 211, substituted "U.S. Customs and Border Protection" for "United States Customs Service" in part heading.
#### Peter Schnabl, appellee, v. Joseph Moll, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,906.

Action to recover damages sustained in automobile collision. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Muuicipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Francis Borrelli, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 9, 1925.

*631Louis J. Behan and William J. Corrigan, for appellant.

Carpenter, Earnhardt & Reynolds, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
# C_2009082EN.01000201.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 February 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-110/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 28 EC - Concept of ‘measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports’ - Prohibition on mopeds, motorcycles, motor tricycles and quadricycles towing a trailer in the territory of a Member State - Road safety - Market access - Obstacle - Proportionality)

(2009/C 82/02)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Recchia and F. Amato, Agents,)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia, Agent, assisted by M. Fiorilli, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Breach of Article 28 EC — National legislation prohibiting motor vehicles (with the exception of tractors) from pulling trailers

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 115, 14.5.2005.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF INCOME, BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                       618
<INVENTORY>                                      2,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,184
<PP&E>                                         133,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,203
<BONDS>                                         75,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,366
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   161,429
<SALES>                                         28,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,573
<CGS>                                           24,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   746
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,819
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,526
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.99
        

</TABLE>
§ 45.5 Elements of payable claim: facilities and providers. ( a ) *In general.* This section describes some of the necessary elements of a payable claim. The health care involved must occur in a covered military medical treatment facility (MTF) and be provided by a DoD health care provider acting within the scope of employment.
( b ) *Covered MTF.* ( 1 ) As provided in section 2733a(b)(3) and (i)(1), the alleged act or omission constituting medical malpractice must have occurred in a covered MTF. For the purposes of this regulation, an MTF is a medical center, inpatient hospital, or ambulatory care center, as those facilities are described in 10 U.S.C. 1073d. Fixed dental clinics are also included.
( 2 ) A claim may not be based on health care services provided by DoD health care providers in any other location, such as in the field, battalion aid stations, ships, planes, deployed settings, or in any other place that is not a covered MTF.
( c ) *DoD health care provider.* As provided in section 2733a(i)(2), a DoD health care provider is a member of the uniformed services, DoD civilian employee, or personal services contractor of the Department (under 10 U.S.C. 1091) authorized by DoD to provide health care services. A non-personal services contractor or a volunteer working in an MTF is not a DoD health care provider for purposes of a payable claim under this part.
( d ) *Scope of employment.* As provided in section 2733a(b)(2), for a claim to be payable under this part, the DoD health care provider whose negligent or wrongful act or omission is the basis of a claim must be acting within the scope of employment, meaning that the provider was acting in furtherance of his or her duties in the MTF. For personal services contractors, “scope of employment” means the contractor was acting within the scope of his or her duties.
### SUBCHAPTER II—RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND SMALL FARM RESEARCH AND EDUCATION
**Exhibit 32.B****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2005, of El Paso NaturalGas Company (the “Company”) as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Greg G. Gruber           Greg G. Gruber *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial* *Officer and Treasurer* *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)*August 5, 2005A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to El Paso Natural GasCompany and will be retained by El Paso Natural Gas Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1998 and
the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
nine months ended September 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             262
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9853
<ALLOWANCES>                                       304
<INVENTORY>                                       4119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 14596
<PP&E>                                            7857
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   19975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11901
<BONDS>                                           2294
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1226
<OTHER-SE>                                        2897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19975
<SALES>                                          30082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 30216
<CGS>                                            27003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    27003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    13
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1473)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.09)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  |  |                                
| |  |  |  | -------------------------------
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | /s/ David J. Noble             
| |  |  |  | David J. Noble                 
| |  |  |  | Chairman/Director              
| |  |  |  | And Principal Executive Officer

DateAugust 6, 2009
#### In re NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 6, 1903.)

In the matter of the application of the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company to the board of railroad commissioners for the closing of certain grade crossings, etc.

No opinion. Determination of railroad commissioners affirmed, with costs.
#### § 516.45 Records determined to be releasable.

If the deciding official, after considering the factors set forth in § 536.44, determines that all or part of requested official records are releasable, copies of the records should be furnished to the requester.
J ULIE O ETTINGER M ANAGING D IRECTOR

– I NTERNATIONAL & R EGULATORY A FFAIRS (202) 296-2370 (202) 296-2869 FAX

JULIE

. OETTINGER @ UNITED

. COM

March 5, 2010

Esta Rosenberg, Chief

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division George Wellington, Chief

Foreign Carrier Licensing Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Joint Application and No tice of United Air Lines, Inc. and Spanair, S.A. (Blanket Code Share)

DOT-OST-2010- 0055, -2004-19148, -2003-16219

Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Wellington:

This is to advise that United has comple ted its poll of U.S. carrier representatives

in the attached service lis t for the above-referenced application, which was filed on March 2. No carrier had any objection to the ap proval of this application. A copy of this letter is today being filed with the Department's Docket Section.

Respectfully submitted,

Julie Oettinger Managing Director—International and Regulatory Affairs

cc: Service ListCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on

all persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

byerlyjr@state.gov

carl.nelson@aa.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

hkamen@coair.com howard_kass@usairways.com jim.ballough@faa.gov john.allen@faa.gov

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com

Annalei Avanceña Advisor—Regulatory Affairs

Dated: March 5, 2010
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Josephine M. Proben, Deceased. T. Frederick Roediger, Respondent; John A. Proben, Jr., et al., Appellants.

Motion tu dispense with the printing of the record and brief denied, without costs. Motion to extend time to perfect the appeal granted on condition that appellants be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the January 1961 Term, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before November 15, 1960.
#### § 284.4 Policy.

It is DoD policy under 32 CFR part 283 that waiver applications for debts resulting from erroneous payments of pay and allowances (hereafter referred to as “waiver applications”) be processed according to all pertinent statutes, regulations, and other relevant authorities.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF MICHAEL FOODS, INC.



|                                                |  |                       
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name                                            |  | State of Incorporation
|Crystal Farms Refrigerated Distribution Company |  | Minnesota             
|                                                | 
|Northern Star Co.                               |  | Minnesota             
|                                                | 
|KMS Dairy, Inc.                                 |  | Minnesota             
|                                                | 
|M. G. Waldbaum Company                          |  | Nebraska              
|                                                | 
|Papettis Hygrade Egg Products, Inc.            |  | Minnesota             
|                                                | 
|Casa Trucking, Inc.                             |  | Minnesota             
|                                                | 
|Wisco Farm Cooperative                          |  | Wisconsin             
|                                                | 
|WFC, Inc.                                       |  | Wisconsin             
|                                                | 
|Farm Fresh Foods, Inc.                          |  | Nevada                
|                                                | 
|Michael Foods of Delaware, Inc.                 |  | Delaware              
|                                                | 
|Minnesota Products, Inc.                        |  | Minnesota             
|                                                | 
|MFI Food Canada, Ltd.                           |  | Canada                
|                                                | 
|Trilogy Egg Products, Inc.                      |  | Canada
#### Mark Broxmeyer et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Harrison et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 29, 1977, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. On the court’s own motion, the cross appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
### §674. No private right of action

Nothing in this part may be construed to create a private right of action for enforcement of any provision of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XXII, §2225, formerly title II, §215, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2155; renumbered title XXII, §2225, Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(2)(H), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4178.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, known as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 134 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 115–278.