alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 507.4 Responsibilities. The Director of The Institute of Heraldry (TIOH) will— ( a ) Monitor the overall operation of the Heraldic Quality Control Program.
( b ) Establish policy and procedures to: ( 1 ) Certify manufacturers of insignia and plaques.
( 2 ) Control the manufacture and quality assurance of military decorations, the DA seal and emblem, Branch of Service plaques, and other heraldic items.
( 3 ) Grant certificates of authority for the manufacture and commercial sale of Service flags and Service lapel buttons.
( 4 ) Provide heraldic services to the Executive branch, Department of Defense, and other Federal agencies on a reimbursable basis.
( 5 ) Provide advisory opinions on the use of Army heraldic items for licensing or other commercial purposes (for example, the Army Emblem, Army Flag, unit insignia, and items approved for wear on uniforms), at the request of the Army Trademark Licensing Program.
§ 21.465 What are grants officers' and agreements officers' responsibilities? Grants officers and agreements officers should be allowed wide latitude to exercise judgment in performing their responsibilities, which are to ensure that: ( a ) Individual awards are used effectively in the execution of DoD programs, and are made and administered in accordance with applicable laws, Executive orders, regulations, and DoD policies.
( b ) Sufficient funds are available for obligation.
( c ) Recipients of awards receive impartial, fair, and equitable treatment.
<PAGE>
                                                               EXHIBIT 24.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statement No 333-00905
on Form S-8 of American Vantage Companies of our report dated October 9, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of American Vantage Companies as of
July 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report
appears in the July 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Vantage
Companies.


/s/Bradshaw, Smith & Co., LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
November 12, 2002
Form of Certificate of Common Stock



 Exhibit 4.1 
 

 







 The Corporation shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement of the
powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such
requests shall be made to the Corporation’s Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. 
 The following abbreviations, when
used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

													
	 TEN COM
	  	–	  	 as tenants in common
	  	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT –	  	_________	  	Custodian	  	________
	 TEN ENT
	  	–	  	 as tenants by the entireties
	  		  	(Cust)	  		  	(Minor)
	 JT TEN
	  	–	  	 as joint tenants with right of
	  		  	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
		  		  	 survivorship and not as tenants in
	  		  	Act _____________________
		  		  	 common
	  		  	(State)
		  		  		  	UNIF TRF MIN ACT –	  	_______	  	Custodian (until age ____)
		  		  		  		  	(Cust)	  	
		  		  		  		  	__________ under Uniform ____
		  		  		  		  	(Minor)	  		  	
		  		  		  		  	to Minor Act ________________
		  		  		  		  		  	(State)

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ___________________________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
  

									
	 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
 IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	  		 		  		 	 
	  	  		 		  		 	 

 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Shares 
 of the common stock represented by the
within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Attorney 
 to transfer the said stock on the books
of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated _______________________________ 
  

			
		
	X 	 	  
	X 	 	  
	 NOTICE:
	 	THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE
WHATEVER.


 Signature(s) Guaranteed 
  

			
		
	By	 	  
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED
SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C RULE 17Ad-15.
----

**Exhibit        21**

**SUBSIDIARIES        OF THE REGISTRANT**

| Name                                        | Jurisdiction                  Of                  Incorporation |
|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Hurco                  B.V.                 | the                  Netherlands                                |
| Hurco                  Europe Limited       | United                  Kingdom                                 |
| Hurco                  GmbH                 | Federal                  Republic of Germany                    |
| Hurco                  Manufacturing Ltd.   | Taiwan                  R.O.C.                                  |
| Hurco                  S.a.r.l.             | France                                                          |
| Hurco                  S.r.l.               | Italy                                                           |
| Hurco                  (S.E. Asia) Pte Ltd. | Singapore                                                       |

----
### §138d. Application

#### (a) Contents of application

An application for accreditation under this chapter shall be prepared and submitted to the Secretary and shall include—

(1) the name and address of the laboratory;

(2) the name and address of the owners and managers of such laboratory;

(3) a statement concerning the type of analysis the laboratory intends to conduct;

(4) a brief history of the laboratory and its previous operations; and

(5) such other information as may be required by the Secretary.

#### (b) Restrictions on submission of application

A laboratory that has been denied, or has lost, accreditation under this chapter shall not reapply for accreditation until the expiration of at least 6 months after such denial or loss of accreditation. Corrective actions taken by the laboratory to address deficiencies upon which the denial or loss of accreditation was based must accompany the reapplication.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIII, §1325, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3564.)
H. Res. 1449 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 20, 2024. 

Whereas antisemitism is a threat to the fundamental freedoms, rights, security, and diversity of all citizens, societies, and countries; 

Whereas there has been an increase of antisemitic rhetoric 

and acts in many countries around the world; 

Whereas, in the months since the October 7, 2023, Hamas 

terrorist attack against Israel, Jewish communities 

around the world have experienced a significant increase 

in antisemitic threats; 

Whereas, in the Berlin Declaration of April 29, 2004, participating states of the Organization for Security and co-operation in Europe condemned antisemitism and committed to take specific actions to combat it; 

Whereas, in 2016, the 31 member states of the International 

Holocaust Remembrance Alliance adopted a legally nonbinding ‘‘working definition’’ of antisemitism, an important internationally recognized tool to increase understanding of antisemitism; 

Whereas, on May 25, 2023, the White House issued the 

United States National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism, making clear that the fight against antisemitism is a national, bipartisan priority that must be 
2 

•HRES 1449 EH 

successfully conducted through a whole-of-governmentand-society approach; 

Whereas, on July 17, 2024, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, the 

United States and partners unveiled the Global Guidelines for Countering Antisemitism; 

Whereas the Global Guidelines constitute a multilateral 

framework encompassing 12 areas of public policy, including: Jewish community protection, the need for leaders to speak out against antisemitism, uniform collection 

of data about antisemitism, and education of the Holocaust and Jewish heritage; 

Whereas the Global Guidelines include policies to monitor and 

combat antisemitism that can be implemented and adapted to a wide variety of national, regional, and cultural 

contexts; and 

Whereas more than 40 states and international bodies have 

endorsed the Global Guidelines for Countering Antisemitism: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) condemns the rise of antisemitism in countries 

around the world; 

(2) welcomes the Global Guidelines for Countering 

Antisemitism unveiled by the United States and partners 

in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on July 17, 2024; 

(3) calls upon states and international bodies to 

take action to counter antisemitism, including by endorsing and embracing the Global Guidelines for Countering 

Antisemitism; and 
3 

•HRES 1449 EH 

(4) encourages greater action and international cooperation to counter antisemitism. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
First Amendment dated August 2, 2002-Supplemental



 Exhibit 10.6.1 
  
 AMENDMENT TO THE JACK IN THE BOX INC. SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE 
 RETIREMENT PLAN 

 
 THIS AMENDMENT to the Jack in the Box Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is adopted effective as of August 2, 2002.

  
 Notwithstanding any provision of the Jack in the Box Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and
restated effective as of May 8, 2001, (the “SERP”) to the contrary, the SERP is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1.    Service with Jack in the Box Inc. (the “Company”) and salary paid by the Company to Ken Williams (the “Participant”) shall be deemed to continue, without interruption, through and until
October 31, 2004 (the “Deemed Service”). 
  
 2.    The deemed salary of the Participant
for the 2003 calendar year shall be equal to the Participant’s actual 2002 calendar year salary increased by two percent (2%). The Participant’s deemed bonus for the 2003 calendar year shall be deemed to be Level 4 (65%). 

 
 3.    The deemed salary of the Participant for the 2004 calendar year shall be equal to the Participants
deemed 2003 salary increased by two percent (2%). The Participant’s deemed bonus for the 2004 calendar year shall be deemed to be Level 4 (65%). 
  
 4.    The Participant shall be entitled to an additional benefit under the SERP equal to that amount which would have been accrued for the benefit of the Participant under the
qualified defined benefit plan maintained by the Company which qualifies under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Retirement Plan”) had the period of Deemed Service been taken into account under the terms of the Retirement
Plan in calculating such Participant’s accrued benefit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Retirement Plan, and any other retirement plan of the Company which is intended to be tax-qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code,
shall not be amended, nor shall any such plan be required, to accrue any additional benefit under the terms of such tax-qualified plan as a result of this Deemed Service or this SERP amendment. 
  

5.    Except as modified by this Amendment, all the terms and provisions of the SERP, as previously amended and restated effective as of May 8,
2001, shall continue in full force and effect. 
  
 This amendment is executed effective as of the date set forth
above at San Diego, California. 
  
  
 
	 PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
 FOR THE JACK IN THE BOX INC.

SUPPLEMENT EXECUTIVE
 RETIREMENT PLAN
 
	 
	 By:     CARLO E. CETTI
 
	 

	 On behalf of the Plan Administrative
 Committee
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, John S. Chen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sybase, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: March 1, 2007       /s/ JOHN S. CHEN         John S. Chen    Chief Executive Officer and President
### Court ofAppeals, State ofMichigan 

### ORDER Melissa Mays v Governor Rick Snyder Docket No. 335555, 335725, 335726 LC No. 16-000017-MM Kathleen Jansen Presiding Judge Karen M. Fort Hood Michael J. Riordan

Judges The Court orders that the January 25, 2018 opinion is hereby AMENDED. The opinion contained the following clerical error: On Page 8, Paragraph 2, the opin ion incorrectly refers to June 21, 2015, when in fact, the opinion should read July 21, 2015. In all other respects, the January 25, 2018 opinion remains unchanged.

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

# JAN 

# 2 

# 6 2018 Date
### §1136. Security exercises

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall establish a program for conducting security exercises for public transportation agencies for the purpose of assessing and improving the capabilities of entities described in subsection (b) to prevent, prepare for, mitigate against, respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism.

#### (b) Covered entities

Entities to be assessed under the program shall include—

(1) Federal, State, and local agencies and tribal governments;

(2) public transportation agencies;

(3) governmental and nongovernmental emergency response providers and law enforcement personnel, including transit police; and

(4) any other organization or entity that the Secretary determines appropriate.

#### (c) Requirements

The Secretary shall ensure that the program—

(1) requires, for public transportation agencies which the Secretary deems appropriate, exercises to be conducted that are—

(A) scaled and tailored to the needs of specific public transportation systems, and include taking into account the needs of the elderly and individuals with disabilities;

(B) live;

(C) coordinated with appropriate officials;

(D) as realistic as practicable and based on current risk assessments, including credible threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences;

(E) inclusive, as appropriate, of frontline employees and managers; and

(F) consistent with the National Incident Management System, the National Response Plan, the National Infrastructure Protection Plan, the National Preparedness Guidance, the National Preparedness Goal, and other such national initiatives;

(2) provides that exercises described in paragraph (1) will be—

(A) evaluated by the Secretary against clear and consistent performance measures;

(B) assessed by the Secretary to learn best practices, which shall be shared with appropriate Federal, State, local, and tribal officials, governmental and nongovernmental emergency response providers, law enforcement personnel, including railroad and transit police, and appropriate stakeholders; and

(C) followed by remedial action by covered entities in response to lessons learned;

(3) involves individuals in neighborhoods around the infrastructure of a public transportation system; and

(4) assists State, local, and tribal governments and public transportation agencies in designing, implementing, and evaluating exercises that conform to the requirements of paragraph (2).

#### (d) National Exercise Program

The Secretary shall ensure that the exercise program developed under subsection (a) is a component of the National Exercise Program established under section 748 of this title.

#### (e) Ferry system exemption

This section does not apply to any ferry system for which drills are required to be conducted pursuant to section 70103 of title 46.

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XIV, §1407, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 408.)
Exhibit 21.1

                          Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.

                                  Subsidiaries




                                                                 Percentage of
                                             Jursidiction     Voting Stock Owned
Name of Subsidiary                         of Incorporation     by Registration

Ben & Jerry's Canada (1992), Inc.               Canada               100%

Ben & Jerry's Children's Center, Inc.           Vermont              100%

Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Ltd.                United Kingdom           100%

Ben & Jerry's Homemade (FSC), Inc.             Barbados              100%

Ben & Jerry's Homemade Holdings, Inc.           Vermont              100%

Ben & Jerry=s of New York                      New York              100%

Ben & Jerry's France SARL                       France               100%

Ben & Jerry=s International, Inc.              Delaware              100%

Ben & Jerry's Franchising, Inc.                 Vermont              100%
§ 516.12 Service of civil process outside the United States. ( a ) *Process of foreign courts.* In foreign countries service of process issued by foreign courts will be made under the law of the place of service, as modified by status of forces agreements, treaties or other agreements. In foreign areas under exclusive U.S. jurisdiction, service of process issued by foreign courts will be made under the law specified by appropriate U.S. authority.
( b ) *Process of Federal courts.* Service of process on U.S. citizens or residents may be accomplished under the following provisions: The Hague Convention, reprinted in 28 USCA Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, following Rule 4; Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i); 28 USC 1781 and 1783; and, the rules of the Federal court concerned. If a DA official receives a request to serve Federal process on a person overseas, he will determine if the individual wishes to accept service voluntarily. Individuals will be permitted to seek counsel. If the person will not accept service voluntarily, the party requesting service will be notified and advised to follow procedures prescribed by the law of the foreign country concerned.
( c ) *Process of state courts.* If a DA official receives a request to serve state court process on a person overseas, he will determine if the individual wishes to accept service voluntarily. Individuals will be permitted to seek counsel. If the person will not accept service voluntarily, the party requesting service will be notified and advised to follow procedures prescribed by the law of the foreign country concerned. (See, for example, The Hague Convention, reprinted in 28 USCA Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, following Rule 4).
( d ) *Suits against the United States.* DA personnel served with foreign civil process will notify the appropriate SJA or legal adviser, who will return the document to the issuing authority explaining the lack of authority to accept service for the United States. Service on the United States must be made upon DOJ through established diplomatic channels.
#### KNIGHT PUBLISHING CO. v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK

No. 70P97

Case below: 346 N.C. 280

125 N.C.App. 1

Motion by defendant to suspend the Rules of Appellate Procedure in order to reconsider petition for discretionary review dismissed 4 September 1997. Motion by plaintiff to suspend rules in order to reconsider petition for discretionary review dismissed 4 September 1997.