alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7407

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PATRICK DEVONE WALKER, a/k/a Pat,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-95-5)

Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 21, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Devone Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Devone Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Walker, No. CR-95-5

(W.D.N.C. filed Aug. 10, 2001; entered Aug. 13, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered December 6, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00466-CR

JUAN MANUEL AREVALOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-00219-M

ORDER

Appellant has informed the Court that he wishes to file a pro se response to the Anders

brief filed by appellate counsel. Accordingly, we ORDER appellate counsel F. Clinton Broden 

to provide appellant with copies of the clerk’s and reporter’s records. We further ORDER Mr. 

Broden to provide this Court, within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order, with written 

verification that the record has been sent to appellant.

Appellant’s pro se response is due by February 7, 2020.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Ernest White, 

Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court; Belinda Baraka, Official Court Reporter, 194th 
Judicial District Court, Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; F. Clinton Broden; and the 

Dallas County District Attorney’s Office. 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first class mail, to Juan Manuel 

Arevalos, BIN 17058346, Dallas County Jail, North Tower 6E04, PO Box 660334, Dallas, TX 

75266-0334.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
#### § 37.110 What type of instruments are technology investment agreements (TIAs)?

TIAs are assistance instruments used to stimulate or support research. As discussed in appendix B to this part, a TIA may be either a kind of cooperative agreement or a type of assistance transaction other than a grant or cooperative agreement.
#### § 552.151 Scope.

This part does not list all activities or practices prohibited on the installation of Fort Jackson, South Carolina. Various other Army and Fort Jackson regulations specifically prohibit other activities or practices. See appendix A to this subpart.
### §5404. Human capital performance payments

(a)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Office may authorize an agency to provide human capital performance payments to individual employees based on exceptional performance contributing to the achievement of the agency mission.

(2) The number of employees in an agency receiving payments from the Fund, in any year, shall not be more than the number equal to 15 percent of the agency's average total civilian full- and part-time permanent employment for the previous fiscal year.

(b)(1) A human capital performance payment provided to an individual employee from the Fund, in any year, shall not exceed 10 percent of the employee's rate of basic pay.

(2) The aggregate of an employee's rate of basic pay, adjusted by any locality-based comparability payments, and human capital performance pay, as defined by regulation, may not exceed the rate of basic pay for Executive Level IV in any year.

(3) Any human capital performance payment provided to an employee from the Fund is in addition to any annual pay adjustment (under section 5303 or any similar provision of law) and any locality-based comparability payment that may apply.

(c) No monies from the Human Capital Performance Fund may be used to pay for a new position, for other performance-related payments, or for recruitment or retention incentives paid under sections 5753 and 5754.

(d)(1) An agency may finance initial human capital performance payments using monies from the Human Capital Performance Fund, as available.

(2) In subsequent years, continuation of previously awarded human capital performance payments shall be financed from other agency funds available for salaries and expenses.

(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title XI, §1129(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1643.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Executive Level IV, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is set out in section 5315 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5404, added Pub. L. 95–454, title V, §501, Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1183; amended Pub. L. 98–615, title II, §201(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3210; Pub. L. 101–103, §3(a), Sept. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 670, related to merit increases, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–89, §3(a)(1), (c), Sept. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 981, 983, eff. Nov. 1, 1993.
#### McKinney, administrator, *vs.*Wells *&*Avera; McKinney, administrator, *vs.*Avera.

WAirarn, Chief Justice, being engaged in presiding over the senate organized as a court of impeachment, did not sit in this case.]

The first item of a testator’s will was as follows: “I have sold the stock of goods now owned by me to my brother, D. *Q.*Avera, he to pay my executor the cost price of the same, and my brother is to *451have the use oí the store-house as long as he wants it.” Subsequent provisions oí the will directed that the testator’s wife keep his property together, and use her discretion in renting it out from year to year, for the benefit of herself and the children, who were to be reared and educated out of the rents and profits, and out of collections on the testator’s notes and accounts, The property was to be kept together until the youngest child became of age, and then was to be sold or divided, the wife and each of the children to have an equal share. The wife and the said brother of the testator were appointed executors of the will and guardians of the children, bond and security being dispensed with.

*Held,*that the use of the store-house was bequeathed to the brother, and that it was his as matter of right, to occupy during pleasure without paying rent, and that such occupation might be with or without a partner in his business.

Bleckley, Justice.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic
Industries Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Tal Raz, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

Date: June 28, 2004


                                        /s/ Tal Raz
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Tal Raz
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# C_2023318EN.01000201.xml

| 8.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11185 – PERMIRA / GRUPPO FLORENCE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 318/02)

On 4 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11185. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11185. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                          27,510
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234,005
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    100,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               377,849
<PP&E>                                         122,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,396
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 519,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          248,128
<BONDS>                                         33,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           277
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   519,683
<SALES>                                      1,137,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,137,605
<CGS>                                          848,829
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  848,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               219,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,648<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30
<FN>
<F1>The Company recognized minority interest expense in the amount of $1,070,000
in the consolidated statement of operations, which represents the minority
shareholders' portion of the income for less than wholly-owned subsidiaries. The
minority interest share of the net assets of these subsidiaries of $5,000,000 as
of April 29, 2000 is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheet of the Company.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.3



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Duquesne Light Company (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Morgan K. OBrien, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 24th day of March,
2005.



/s/ Morgan K. OBrienMorgan K. OBrienPresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Company and will be retained by Duquesne Light Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard Alvarez, Appellant.

Judgment,Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered February 26, 1976, convicting defendant after a jury trial of criminal sale of *710a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and otherwise affirmed. Defendant, on the facts of this case, could not have committed the criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree without also having committed the criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, the counts being inclusory and concurrent (CPL 300.30, subd *4; People v Rivers,*59 AD2d 847). Where the verdict is comprised of inclusory, concurrent counts, a verdict of guilty on the greater is deemed a dismissal of the lesser count (CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]; *People v Lee,*39 NY2d 388, 390). We have examined the other points raised by appellant and find them without merit. Moreover, although afforded an opportunity to do so, appellant *pro se*has failed to file any supplemental points. Concur-Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Fein, Markewich and Sullivan, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           129,526
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         353
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 129,879
<CASH>                                           4,973
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              15,233
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,033
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                104,493
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             18,728
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 11,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           320
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,033
<PREMIUMS>                                      69,677
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              7,618
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (342)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     215
<BENEFITS>                                      63,617
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     10,377
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             4,216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,042)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,092)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (75)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (75)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  92,417
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             59,227
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                4,389
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              18,368
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                34,364
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 91,349
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (4,389)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Julius Rose, Appellant, v. Irma Rose, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding brought by relator, the father of a boy seven years of age, for the purpose of obtaining unsupervised “ week-end ” visitation rights with respect to said child, the father appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 19, 1959, dismissing his petition, awarding custody of the infant to the infant’s mother and granting the father the right of “ supervised visitation ” on each Wednesday only at the home of the child’s mother. Order affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to the prosecution of a new proceeding at Special Term, based upon a written psychiatric report made after an examination of the father by a competent psychiatrist. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 936.16 Required regulatory program amendments. Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(f)(1), Oklahoma is required to submit to OSM by the specified date the following written, proposed program amendment, or a description of an amendment to be proposed that meets the requirements of SMCRA and 30 CFR Chapter VII and a timetable for enactment that is consistent with Oklahoma's established administrative or legislative procedures. ( a ) - ( g ) [Reserved]
[60 FR 2520, Jan. 10, 1995; 64 FR 70587, Dec. 17, 1999]
#### § 70.7 Effective date and implementation.

This part is effective immediately for the purpose of preparing implementing documents. DoD Directive 1332.28, March 29, 1978, is officially canceled, effective November 27, 1982. This part applies to all discharge review proceedings conducted on or after November 27, 1982. § 70.10 applies to all complaint proceedings conducted on or after September 28, 1982. Final action on complaints shall not be taken until September 28, 1982, unless earlier corrective action is requested expressly by the applicant (or the applicant's counsel) whose case is the subject of the decisional document. If earlier corrective action is requested, it shall be taken in accordance with § 70.10.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending October 6, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Keller, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/
 Robert J. Keller  
|                       
|Robert
 J. Keller      
|Chief Executive Officer
|October 24, 2007       

17

---
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 19, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Keller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Robert J. KellerChief Executive OfficerApril 21, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                           27981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    18962
<ALLOWANCES>                                       965
<INVENTORY>                                       6685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 57291
<PP&E>                                           90305
<DEPRECIATION>                                   56539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   96791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11923
<BONDS>                                            181
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         53125
<OTHER-SE>                                      121059
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     96791
<SALES>                                          36334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 36334
<CGS>                                            24812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    24812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5106
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3232
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>