alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §727. Improvements to information technology systems

#### (a) Measures to improve information technology systems

The Administrator, in coordination with the Chief Information Officer of the Department, shall take appropriate measures to update and improve the information technology systems of the Agency, including measures to—

(1) ensure that the multiple information technology systems of the Agency (including the National Emergency Management Information System, the Logistics Information Management System III, and the Automated Deployment Database) are, to the extent practicable, fully compatible and can share and access information, as appropriate, from each other;

(2) ensure technology enhancements reach the headquarters and regional offices of the Agency in a timely fashion, to allow seamless integration;

(3) develop and maintain a testing environment that ensures that all system components are properly and thoroughly tested before their release;

(4) ensure that the information technology systems of the Agency have the capacity to track disaster response personnel, mission assignments task orders, commodities, and supplies used in response to a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster;

(5) make appropriate improvements to the National Emergency Management Information System to address shortcomings in such system on October 4, 2006; and

(6) provide training, manuals, and guidance on information technology systems to personnel, including disaster response personnel, to help ensure employees can properly use information technology systems.

#### (b) Report

Not later than 270 days after October 4, 2006, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report describing the implementation of this section, including a description of any actions taken, improvements made, and remaining problems and a description of any additional funding needed to make necessary and appropriate improvements to the information technology systems of the Agency.

(Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §640, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1423.)
### §4523. Award authority

(a) An agency may pay a cash award, up to 5 percent of basic pay, to any law enforcement officer employed in or under such agency who possesses and makes substantial use of 1 or more foreign languages in the performance of official duties.

(b) Awards under this section shall be paid under regulations prescribed by the head of the agency involved (or designee thereof). Regulations prescribed by an agency head (or designee) under this subsecton 1 shall include—

(1) procedures under which foreign language proficiency shall be ascertained;

(2) criteria for the selection of individuals for recognition under this section; and

(3) any other provisions which may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 101–509, title V, §529 [title IV, §408(a)], Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1427, 1467.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1992, see section 529 [title IV, §408(d)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out as a note under section 4521 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "subsection".
### §644. Assistance to non-Federal entities

The Secretary may provide training curricula to any State, local, or tribal government or private organization to assist the government or organization in establishing a program of training to identify human trafficking, upon request from the government or organization.

(Pub. L. 114–22, title IX, §904, May 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015, and not as part of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 which comprises this chapter.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce Bowen, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County *823Court, Suffolk County, rendered February 8, 1977, convicting him of assault in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to a definite term of imprisonment of one year. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a term of intermittent imprisonment for a period of one year, to be served on the first Saturday of each month, from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 85.00 of the Penal Law and CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein (see Penal Law, § 60.05, subd 4; § 85.00). Hopkins, J. P., Damiapi, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
American Country Holdings Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-39657) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan of American 
Country Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 24, 1998, with respect to 
the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997, and the related 
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for 
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1997, and related 
schedules of American Country Holdings Inc. included in this Annual Report 
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,424,216
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    178,595
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         266,002
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,116,291
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,985,104
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      766,902
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             18,431
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 785,333
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,500
<PREFERRED>                                    224,737<F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,060,530
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       66,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  145,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     16,937
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   664
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,681,403
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,985,104
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      892,152
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            53,432
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     659,225
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     712,657
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        179,495
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              18,085
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 197,580
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        96,096<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                   101,484
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,016
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   98,468
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       107,738
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       55,878
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         233,177
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes $14,129 of Preference Stock.
<F2>Includes $9,422 of Monthly Income Preferred Securities dividend requirements.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6786

RONALD G. BAILEY-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden; JAMES SMITH, Security Chief, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA00-803-DKC) Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 31, 2003 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald G. Bailey-El, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronald G. Bailey-El seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his claims filed under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (West Supp. 2003). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Although the district court administratively closed Bailey-El’s case when it consolidated his case with those filed by other inmates, his co-plaintiffs’ actions are still pending. Only once those claims have been adjudicated may this court assert appellate jurisdiction. See Robinson v. Parke-Davis & Co. , 685 F.2d 912, 913 (4th Cir. 1982) (holding that order not final if it disposes of “fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §7122. Exceptions to arbitral awards

(a) Either party to arbitration under this chapter may file with the Authority an exception to any arbitrator's award pursuant to the arbitration (other than an award relating to a matter described in section 7121(f) of this title). If upon review the Authority finds that the award is deficient—

(1) because it is contrary to any law, rule, or regulation; or

(2) on other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts in private sector labor-management relations;

the Authority may take such action and make such recommendations concerning the award as it considers necessary, consistent with applicable laws, rules, or regulations.

(b) If no exception to an arbitrator's award is filed under subsection (a) of this section during the 30-day period beginning on the date the award is served on the party, the award shall be final and binding. An agency shall take the actions required by an arbitrator's final award. The award may include the payment of backpay (as provided in section 5596 of this title).

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title VII, §701, Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1212; amended Pub. L. 98–224, §4, Mar. 2, 1984, 98 Stat. 48.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–224 amended subsec. (b) generally, substituting "beginning on the date the award is served on the party" for "beginning on the date of such award".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1101 of this title.
| **Exhibit 10.16**Description of Director    Compensation Arrangement
Upon election to the Board    of Directors, each non-employee director of the Company receives 2,000 shares of the    Company’s common stock under the stock bonus plan described at Exhibit 10.15 to    this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, each non-employee director receives an    annual retainer of $15,000. The director may elect to receive the retainer in cash or by    the grant of options under the UQM Technologies, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee    Directors incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K as    Exhibit 10.1, or a combination of cash and options. If options are elected, the    director receives options to acquire a number of shares of the Company's common stock that    is determined by utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of grant.    Directors electing option grants in lieu of cash compensation may elect option exercise    periods ranging from three years to ten years, and must elect to receive options at least    six months prior to the anticipated grant date. Directors are also reimbursed for ordinary    and necessary expenses of attending meetings.
 **** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                           19,291
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    29,578
<ALLOWANCES>                        658
<INVENTORY>                       9,693
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 60,022
<PP&E>                           87,694
<DEPRECIATION>                   64,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  100,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            26,161
<BONDS>                          42,484
<COMMON>                          8,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                          71
<OTHER-SE>                        3,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    100,026
<SALES>                          67,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 68,157
<CGS>                            52,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    65,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     75
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    102
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   1,630
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 869
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                        869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .13
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Grigoli, Respondent, against Anthony Nito, Doing Business as Anthony Nito & Son, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from decision of Workmen’s Compensation Board finding the relationship of employer-employee and not independent contractor. Claimant was employed by G. B. Manino and because of the odd and irregular hours of his employment he was able to do extra work for Anthony Nito, doing business as Anthony Nito & Son, a noninsured employer, delivering grapes for which he received five cents per box. He used the truck of his other employer, Manino, with his permission and paid for the gas, oil and other incidentals. Nito gave claimant the names and addresses of customers to receive the grapes and he would on some occasions collect money at the time of delivery. Part of the time he was furnished with a helper, paid for by Nito. While delivering grapes on October 25, 1956 he fell, injuring his leg. The board found the relationship of employer-employee between the parties. In compensation eases, the principal factors to be considered in determining relationship are right to control, method of payment, furnishing of equipment, right to discharge and the so-called relative nature of the work test. Employment can *582often be established on the basis of one of these factors alone. (See 1 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 44.31; *Matter of Klein*v. *Sunrise Bldg. Co.,*7 A D 2d 805, motion for leave to appeal denied 5 N Y 2d 711.) While the board made a negative finding “he was not an independent contractor ”, there was evidence in the record to establish control, method of payment and furnishing a coemployee. *(Matter of Gordon*v. *New York Life Ins. Co.,*300 N. Y. 652; *Matter of Glielmi*v. *Netherland Dairy Co.,*25.4 N. Y. 60, 64.) Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Borgan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
Unassociated Document


    Schedule
      10.16

    Purchasers

    


    


    1. PFK
      Acquisition Group, LLC executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant
      Purchase Agreement as of February 21, 2006. 

    


    2. Alfred
      F.
      Bracher, executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of February 14, 2006. 

    


    3. Howard
      Goldberg executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 13, 2006. 

    


    4. Thomas
      A.
      Nicolette executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 24, 2006. 

    


    5. Real
      Path, Inc. executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of February 14, 2006. 

    


    6. Robert
      Schachter Trust, Diane Schachter, Trustee executed the Senior Secured
      Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement as of February 7, 2006.


    


    7. Harvey
      Goldberg executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 24, 2006. 

    


    8. Larry
      Chimerine executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 21, 2006.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25


                           AMERICAN VANTAGE COMPANIES
                    7674 WEST LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD, SUITE 108
                             LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89128


                                             October 25, 2002

Mr. Ronald J. Tassinari
7889 Rancho Mirage Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada  89113

                           Re:      Employment Agreement

Dear Ron:

                  This letter shall serve to confirm and memorialize our
agreement that the option (the "April 2002 Option") granted to you pursuant to
Paragraph 5(c)(ii) of the Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2002 (the
"Employment Agreement"), between American Vantage Companies ("AVC") and you, to
purchase 28,470 shares of common stock of AVC at a purchase price of $2.49 per
share, exercisable commencing on April 1, 2002 and expiring on March 31, 2012,
as evidenced by the Incentive Stock Option Agreement, dated April 1, 2002,
between AVC and you, has been cancelled, voided and nullified, effective as of
July 31, 2002; and you agree that you shall have no further right to purchase
shares of AVC's common stock pursuant to Paragraph 5(c)(ii) of the Employment
Agreement.

                  If the foregoing accurately reflects our agreement with
respect to the cancellation of the April 2002 Option, please indicate such by
signing your name in the space indicated for such below.


                                        Very truly yours,

                                        American Vantage Companies


                                        By: /s/ Jeanne Hood
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jeanne Hood, Member and Representing
                                                         Compensation Committee


Acknowledged and accepted
as of the date first set forth above:


/s/ Ronald J. Tassinari
---------------------------
    Ronald J. Tassinari
### Part K—Infringement of Plant Variety Protection
### §459. Office of International Affairs

#### (a) Establishment

There is established within the Office of the Secretary an Office of International Affairs. The Office shall be headed by a Director, who shall be a senior official appointed by the Secretary.

#### (b) Duties of the Director

The Director shall have the following duties:

(1) To promote information and education exchange with nations friendly to the United States in order to promote sharing of best practices and technologies relating to homeland security. Such exchange shall include the following:

(A) Exchange of information on research and development on homeland security technologies.

(B) Joint training exercises of first responders.

(C) Exchange of expertise on terrorism prevention, response, and crisis management.

(2) To identify areas for homeland security information and training exchange where the United States has a demonstrated weakness and another friendly nation or nations have a demonstrated expertise.

(3) To plan and undertake international conferences, exchange programs, and training activities.

(4) To manage international activities within the Department in coordination with other Federal officials with responsibility for counter-terrorism matters.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §879, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2245.)
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R.H. Donnelley
Corporation for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officers knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of R.H. Donnelley Corporation as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report. /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    SVP and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2004
    
    
    
    August 9, 2004
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document. 76