17856 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 61 / Monday, March 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

Title VI of the Appropriations Act 

supports an interim final rulemaking as 

the limitation arguably makes formal 

proposed and final rulemaking 

procedures ‘‘impracticable, 

unnecessary, or contrary to the public 

interest.’’ Further, we believe amending 

the rule to remove the requirements for 

non-binding, advisory votes will ensure 

compliance with the Appropriations 

Act. Consistent with the Appropriations 

Act, as well as the Farm Bill, this 

interim final rulemaking is limited to 

the advisory vote provisions of the 

October 3, 2012, (77 FR 60582) 

rulemaking. 

Specifically, we are removing the 

following rule provisions: 

D § 611.100(a), defining the term 

‘‘advisory vote’’; 

D § 611.360, requiring policies and 

procedures for non-binding, advisory 

votes on senior officer compensation; 

D § 611.410, addressing non-binding, 

advisory votes on senior officer 

compensation; 

D § 620.5(a)(11), requiring disclosure 

of any advisory votes held during the 

reporting year at the institution; 

D § 620.6(c)(6), requiring disclosure 

(adjacent to the compensation table) in 

the annual report of a stockholder’s 

right to petition for a non-binding, 

advisory vote on senior officer 

compensation; and 

D § 630.20(i)(last sentence), requiring 

disclosure of any advisory votes held 

during the reporting year within the 

System. 

All other regulatory provisions and 

changes resulting from the October 3, 

2012 (77 FR 60582) rulemaking remain 

in effect. 

IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Pursuant to section 605(b) of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.), the FCA hereby certifies that 

this interim final rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Each of the banks in the System, 

considered together with its affiliated 

associations, has assets and annual 

income in excess of the amounts that 

would qualify them as small entities. 

Therefore, System institutions are not 

‘‘small entities’’ as defined in the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects 

12 CFR Part 611 

Agriculture, Banks, banking, Rural 

areas. 

12 CFR Part 620 

Accounting, Agriculture, Banks, 

banking, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Rural areas. 

12 CFR Part 630 

Accounting, Agriculture, Banks, 

banking, Organization and functions 

(Government agencies), Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Rural 

areas. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, parts 611, 620, and 630 of 

chapter VI, title 12 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations are amended as 

follows: 

PART 611—ORGANIZATION 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 611 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.12, 

1.13, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.10, 2.11, 2.12, 3.0, 3.1, 

3.2, 3.3, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.21, 4.3A, 4.12, 4.12A, 

4.15, 4.20, 4.21, 4.25, 4.26, 4.27, 4.28A, 5.9, 

5.17, 5.25, 7.0–7.13, 8.5(e) of the Farm Credit 

Act (12 U.S.C. 2002, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2020, 

2021, 2071, 2072, 2073, 2091, 2092, 2093, 

2121, 2122, 2123, 2124, 2128, 2129, 2130, 

2142, 2154a, 2183, 2184, 2203, 2208, 2209, 

2211, 2212, 2213, 2214, 2243, 2252, 2261, 

2279a–2279f–1, 2279aa–5(e)); secs. 411 and 

412 of Pub. L. 100–233, 101 Stat. 1568, 1638; 

sec. 414 of Pub. L. 100–399, 102 Stat. 989, 

1004. 

§ 611.100 [Amended] 

■ 2. Section 611.100 is amended by 

removing paragraph (a) and 

redesignating paragraphs (b) through (h) 

as new paragraphs (a) through (g), 

respectively. 

§ 611.360 [Removed and reserved] 

■ 3. Section 611.360 is removed and 

reserved. 

§ 611.410 [Removed and reserved] 

■ 4. Section 611.410 is removed and 

reserved. 

PART 620—DISCLOSURE TO 

SHAREHOLDERS 

■ 5. The authority citation for part 620 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 4.3, 4.3A, 4.19, 5.9, 5.17, 

5.19 of the Farm Credit Act (12 U.S.C. 2154, 

2154a, 2207, 2243, 2252, 2254); sec. 424 of 

Pub. L. 100–233, 101 Stat. 1568, 1656; sec. 

514 of Pub. L. 102–552, 106 Stat. 4102. 

§ 620.5 [Amended] 

■ 6. Section 620.5 is amended by 

removing paragraph (a)(11) and 

redesignating paragraph (a)(12) as new 

paragraph (a)(11). 

§ 620.6 [Amended] 

■ 7. Section 620.6 is amended by 

removing paragraph (c)(6) and 

redesignating paragraph (c)(7) as new 

paragraph (c)(6). 

PART 630—DISCLOSURE TO 

INVESTORS IN SYSTEM-WIDE AND 

CONSOLIDATED BANK DEBT 

OBLIGATIONS OF THE FARM CREDIT 

SYSTEM 

■ 8. The authority citation for part 630 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 4.2, 4.9, 5.9, 5.17, 5.19 of 

the Farm Credit Act (12 U.S.C. 2153, 2160, 

2243, 2252, 2254); sec. 424 of Pub. L. 100– 

233, 101 Stat. 1568, 1656; sec. 514 of Pub. L. 

102–552, 106 Stat. 4102. 

§ 630.20 [Amended] 

■ 9. Section 630.20 is amended by 

removing the last sentence of paragraph 

(i). 

Dated: March 21, 2014. 

Dale L. Aultman, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 2014–06783 Filed 3–28–14; 8:45 a.m.] 

BILLING CODE 6705–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0740; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NE–24–AD; Amendment 39– 

17804; AD 2014–05–32] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & 

Whitney Turbofan Engines 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all Pratt 

& Whitney (PW) PW2037, PW2037D, 

PW2037M, PW2040, PW2040D, 

PW2043, PW2146, PW2240, PW2337, 

PW2643, and F117–PW–100 turbofan 

engines. This AD was prompted by a 

rupture of the diffuser-to-high-pressure 

turbine (HPT) case flange. This AD 

requires a one-time eddy current 

inspection (ECI) of affected engines with 

certain diffuser and HPT cases installed. 

This AD also requires a fluorescentpenetrant inspection (FPI) of the 

diffuser case rear flange and HPT case 

front flange. We are issuing this AD to 

prevent failure of the diffuser-to-HPT 

case flange, which could lead to 

uncontained engine failure and damage 

to the airplane. 

DATES: This AD is effective May 5, 2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in this AD 

as of May 5, 2014. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 61 / Monday, March 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 17857 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Pratt & 

Whitney, 400 Main St., East Hartford, 

CT 06108; phone: 860–565–8770; fax: 

860–565–4503. You may view this 

service information at the FAA, Engine 

& Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0740; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Document Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Riley, Aerospace Engineer, Engine 

Certification Office, FAA, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; 

phone: 781–238–7758; fax: 781–238– 

7199; email: mark.riley@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to all PW PW2037, PW2037D, 

PW2037M, PW2040, PW2040D, 

PW2043, PW2146, PW2240, PW2337, 

PW2643, and F117–PW–100 turbofan 

engines. The NPRM published in the 

Federal Register on October 29, 2013 

(78 FR 64419). The NPRM was 

prompted by a rupture of the diffuserto-HPT case flange. The NPRM 

proposed to require a one-time ECI of 

affected engines with certain diffuser 

and HPT cases installed and an FPI of 

the diffuser case rear flange and HPT 

case front flange. We are issuing this AD 

to prevent failure of the diffuser-to-HPT 

case flange, which could lead to 

uncontained engine failure and damage 

to the airplane. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. The 

following presents the comments 

received on the proposal and the FAA’s 

response to each comment. 

Request Credit for FPI at Piece Part 

Level 

Delta Air Lines (DAL), PW, Federal 

Express, and United Parcel Service 

(UPS) requested that previous FPI of 

cases at the piece part level be allowed 

for AD compliance in lieu of ECI. The 

justification for this request is that FPI 

of diffuser/HPT cases at the piece part 

level performed after January 1, 2010 are 

equivalent to the ECI procedures. 

We agree. We changed the AD to 

allow credit for FPI of diffuser and HPT 

cases performed after January 1, 2010. 

Request to Eliminate Initial Inspection 

and Mandated Repetitive Inspections 

DAL and PW requested elimination of 

inspection for diffuser/HPT cases 

identified in Table 1 to paragraph (e) of 

this AD because the inspections have 

already been completed. DAL and PW 

also requested that mandated repetitive 

inspections of the diffuser and HPT case 

be eliminated since this requirement is 

already in the engine manual and part 

of DAL’s PW2000 maintenance program. 

Mandated inspection results in a quality 

records burden. The AD is requested to 

be withdrawn based on these requested 

actions. 

We partially agree. We agree that 

many of the diffuser/HPT case 

inspections have been completed. PW 

reports that all diffuser and HPT cases 

have been inspected except for three. 

Those three cases are installed on 

engines not currently in service. We 

changed the AD to eliminate Table 1 to 

paragraph (e) of this AD. We added the 

remaining diffuser cases and HPT cases 

requiring inspection to paragraph (e) of 

this AD. 

We do not agree that mandated 

inspections for the diffuser and HPT 

cases are not required as diffuser or HPT 

case failure may result in a catastrophic 

aircraft event. We did not change the 

AD requirement for repetitive 

inspections. This AD will not be 

withdrawn. 

Request to Exclude F117–PW–100 

Requirements 

PW requested that F117–PW–100 

requirements not be included in this AD 

as the inspections will be completed by 

December 2013. 

We partially agree. We received 

confirmation that the diffuser and HPT 

cases that are applicable to F117–PW– 

100 engines have been inspected. 

However, since the F117–PW–100 

engine model has been certified by the 

FAA and is on the type certificate data 

sheet, we will require repetitive FPI of 

the diffuser and HPT cases at piece part 

opportunity. We changed this AD by 

deleting diffuser and HPT cases that 

have been inspected. 

Request Definition for Piece Part 

Exposure 

DAL, UPS, and an individual 

commenter requested that a definition 

be provided for ‘‘piece part exposure’’ as 

it applies to repetitive inspections of 

diffuser and HPT cases. The reason for 

this request was to clarify when 

inspections are required. 

We agree. We added a definition for 

‘‘piece part exposure’’ in this AD. 

Request for New Compliance Method 

DAL requested that the compliance 

requirement for repetitive inspections 

direct operator’s to revise their 

approved maintenance programs with 

an FPI of the diffuser and HPT cases and 

not require documenting AD 

compliance for each individual case. 

This change would help to eliminate 

undue burden on operator/maintenance 

facility for AD tracking requirements. 

We partially agree. We agree that 

changing the continuous airworthiness 

maintenance program (CAMP) to require 

diffuser and HPT case inspections 

adequately addresses our safety 

concerns. 

We do not agree that tracking 

repetitive inspections to show AD 

compliance is an undue burden. We 

changed the AD by adding an Optional 

Terminating Action allowing diffuser 

and HPT case inspections to be added 

to the CAMP to satisfy repetitive 

inspection requirements of this AD. 

Request FAA Standard Practices, 

Processes, Consumables, and Standard 

Tooling be Allowed to Perform ECI 

One individual commenter requested 

that only Non-destructive Inspection 

Procedure sections IX through XVIII be 

mandated as these sections contain the 

only items that have an actual effect on 

the unsafe condition of the AD. 

We disagree. The specific ECI 

inspection equipment and procedures 

developed by PW have been verified as 

being able to detect cracks in the 

diffuser case and HPT case M-flange. 

The specific equipment and procedures 

must be used to ensure proper 

inspection results. However, operators 

and maintenance facilities can propose 

use of other equipment and/or 

procedures as an alternative method of 

compliance if they can validate 

equivalent results. We did not change 

this AD. 

Request Clarification for Applicability 

The same individual commenter 

requested clarification that the 

Compliance paragraph apply to all HPT 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
17858 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 61 / Monday, March 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

and diffuser cases regardless of whether 

they are listed in Table 1 to paragraph 

(e) or not. The reason for this request is 

that it is unclear if the repetitive 

inspections are required only for those 

cases specified in Table 1. 

We agree. We deleted Table 1 to 

paragraph (e) of this AD and added the 

remaining diffuser cases and HPT cases 

requiring inspection to paragraph (e) of 

this AD. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

with the changes described previously 

and minor editorial changes. We have 

determined that these changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 

64419, October 29, 2013) for correcting 

the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 64419, 

October 29, 2013). 

We also determined that these 

changes will not increase the economic 

burden on any operator or increase the 

scope of this AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD will affect 

638 engines installed on airplanes of 

U.S. registry. Of the 638 engines, we 

estimate that about 3 engines will be 

subject to ECI and all engines will be 

subject to the FPI. We also estimate that 

it will take about 5 hours to perform the 

ECI and 3 hours to perform the FPI 

required by this AD. Materials cost for 

the FPI will be about $20 per engine. 

The average labor rate is $85 per hour. 

Based on these figures, we estimate the 

total cost of this AD to U.S. operators is 

$176,725. 

Authority for this Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that it justifies 

making a regulatory distinction, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2014–05–32 Pratt & Whitney: Amendment 

39–17804 Docket No. FAA–2013–0740; 

Directorate Identifier 2013–NE–24–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective May 5, 2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to all Pratt & Whitney 

(PW) PW2037, PW2037D, PW2037M, 

PW2040, PW2040D, PW2043, PW2146, 

PW2240, PW2337, PW2643, and F117–PW– 

100 turbofan engines. 

(d) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a rupture of the 

diffuser-to-high-pressure turbine (HPT) case 

flange. We are issuing this AD to prevent 

failure of the diffuser-to-HPT case flange, 

which could lead to uncontained engine 

failure and damage to the airplane. 

(e) Compliance 

Unless already done, comply with this AD 

within the compliance times specified. 

(1) For diffuser case part number (P/N) 

1B7461, serial numbers (S/Ns) DGGUAK1306 

and DGGUAK1308, and HPT case P/N 

1B2440, S/N DKLBCS1032: 

(i) Within 100 flight cycles or 30 days after 

the effective date of this AD, whichever is 

later, eddy current inspect (ECI) the diffuser 

case and the HPT case M-flange. Use PW 

Service Bulletin (SB) No. PW2000 72–763, 

Revision 1, dated August 30, 2013, to do the 

inspection. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(2) For all diffuser and HPT cases at the 

next piece part opportunity and every piece 

part opportunity thereafter, perform a high 

sensitivity fluorescent-penetrant inspection 

(FPI) of the entire diffuser case rear flange 

(M-flange) and bolt holes, and the entire HPT 

case forward flange (M-flange) and bolt holes. 

(f) Optional Terminating Action 

As a terminating action to the repetitive 

inspection requirements of this AD, you may 

insert the repetitive inspection requirement 

identified in paragraph (e)(2) of this AD into 

the required inspection portion of your 

continuous airworthiness maintenance 

program. 

(g) Definition 

For the purpose of this AD, piece part 

opportunity is defined as when the part is 

completely disassembled. 

(h) Prohibition Statement 

After the effective date of this AD, do not 

install any engine with a diffuser or HPT case 

onto any airplane that was not inspected 

using paragraph (e) of this AD. 

(i) Credit for Previous Actions 

If you performed an ECI of the diffuser case 

and HPT case M-flange using the 

Accomplishment Instructions of PW SB No. 

PW2000 72–763, dated March 22, 2013, or 

you performed a high sensitivity FPI of the 

diffuser case and HPT case at the piece part 

opportunity after January 1, 2010, you met 

the requirements of paragraph (e)(1) of this 

AD. 

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

The Manager, Engine Certification Office, 

FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use 

the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to 

make your request. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Mark Riley, Aerospace Engineer, 

Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; 

phone: 781–238–7758; fax: 781–238–7199; 

email: mark.riley@faa.gov. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 61 / Monday, March 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 17859 

(2) Pratt & Whitney Engine Manual, P/N 

1A6231, (PW2000) and P/N 1B2412 (F117), 

Chapter 72–41–00, Inspection/Check-02, 

(Task 72–41–00–230–002) and Chapter 72– 

52–00, Inspection/Check-02 (Task 72–52–00– 

230–000), which are not incorporated by 

reference in this AD, can be obtained from 

Pratt & Whitney, using the contact 

information in paragraph (l)(3) of this AD. 

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Pratt & Whitney Service Bulletin No. 

PW2000 72–763, Revision 1, dated August 

30, 2013. 

(ii) Reserved 

(3) For PW service information identified 

in this AD, contact Pratt & Whitney, 400 

Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108; phone: 

860–565–8770; fax: 860–565–4503. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 

12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 

MA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

(5) You may view this service information 

at the National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

March 6, 2014. 

Colleen M. D’Alessandro, 

Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–06953 Filed 3–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0079; Airspace 

Docket No. 09–AWA–4] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Amendment to Class B Airspace Area; 

Detroit, MI 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final 

rule published in the Federal Register 

January 21, 2014. In that rule, the shared 

boundary between the Detroit Class B 

airspace Area A and Area B subareas 

did not match, as originally intended, in 

the regulatory text descriptions. This 

correction is necessary to close the 

unintended gap between subareas 

created by the boundary error and to 

ensure the accuracy of the charted 

Detroit Class B airspace area. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, April 

3, 2014. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under 3 CFR part 51, 

subject to the annual revision of FAA 

Order 7400.9 and publication of 

conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Mission Support, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 

267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On January 21, 2014, a final rule for 

FAA Docket No. FAA–2012–0661, 

Airspace Docket No. 09–AWA–4, was 

published in the Federal Register (79 

FR 3305) to amend the Detroit Class B 

airspace area. The Detroit Class B 

airspace area was modified to contain 

aircraft conducting published 

instrument procedures at Detroit 

Metropolitan Wayne County Airport 

(DTW) within Class B airspace, enhance 

safety, improve the flow of air traffic, 

and reduce the potential for midair 

collisions in the DTW terminal area, 

while accommodating the concerns of 

all airspace users. 

Subsequent to publication of the rule, 

the FAA determined the boundary 

segment described in Area A, from lat. 

42°17′18′′ N., long. 83°27′27′′ W. on the 

4.4-mile radius of the Detroit Willow 

Run Airport to lat. 42°20′47′′ N., long. 

83°22′12′′ W. on the 8-mile arc of the 

DXO VOR/DME, and the boundary 

segment described in Area B, from the 

intersection of the DXO VOR/DME 354° 

radial and the Detroit Willow Run 

Airport 047° bearing to lat. 42°20′47′′ N., 

long. 83°22′12′′ W., did not align as 

intended and contained a gap between 

the two adjacent subareas. The FAA is 

correcting this minor error by adding 

the geographic point defined by the 

intersection of the DXO VOR/DME 354° 

radial and the Detroit Willow Run 

Airport 047° bearing in the Area A 

description to remove the gap. 

Correction to Final Rule 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, in the 

Federal Register of January 21, 2014, 

the text on page 3312, column 2, line 47, 

is corrected to read: 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

AGL MI B Detroit, MI [Corrected] 

For Area A, between the words 

‘‘Airport;’’ and ‘‘thence’’, add the 

following: ‘‘thence northeast to the 

intersection of the DXO VOR/DME 354° 

radial and the Detroit Willow Run 

Airport 047° bearing:’’. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 24, 

2014. 

Ellen Crum, 

Acting Manager, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group. 

[FR Doc. 2014–06959 Filed 3–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 558 

[Docket No. FDA–2014–N–0002] 

Zoetis Inc., et al.; Withdrawal of 

Approval of New Animal Drug 

Applications for Combination Drug 

Medicated Feeds Containing an 

Arsenical Drug; Correction 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Final rule; correcting 

amendments. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is correcting a 

document amending the animal drug 

regulations to reflect the withdrawal of 

approval of new animal drug 

applications (NADAs) that appeared in 

the Federal Register of February 27, 

2014 (79 FR 10976). That document 

listed an NADA for which a withdrawal 

of approval (WOA) was not intended 

and failed to remove all conditions of 

use associated with the withdrawn 

NADAs. This correction is being made 

to improve the accuracy of the animal 

drug regulations. 

DATES: This correction is effective 

March 31, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

George K. Haibel, Center for Veterinary 

Medicine (HFV–6), Food and Drug 

Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., 

Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–9019, 

george.haibel@fda.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is 

correcting a document amending the 

animal drug regulations to reflect the 

WOA of NADAs that appeared in the 

Federal Register of February 27, 2014 

(79 FR 10976). That document listed an 

NADA for which a WOA was not 

intended and failed to remove all 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES