alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA review of fracture mechanics life technologyLifetime prediction technology for structural components subjected to cyclic loads is examined. The central objectives of the project are: (1) to report the current state of the art, and (2) recommend future development of fracture mechanics-based analytical tools for modeling subcritical fatigue crack growth in structures. Of special interest is the ability to apply these tools to practical engineering problems and the developmental steps necessary to bring vital technologies to this stage. The authors conducted a survey of published literature and numerous discussions with experts in the field of fracture mechanics life technology. One of the key points made is that fracture mechanics analyses of crack growth often involve consideration of fatigue and fracture under extreme conditions. Therefore, inaccuracies in predicting component lifetime will be dominated by inaccuracies in environment and fatigue crack growth relations, stress intensity factor solutions, and methods used to model given loads and stresses. Suggestions made for reducing these inaccuracies include development of improved models of subcritical crack growth, research efforts aimed at better characterizing residual and assembly stresses that can be introduced during fabrication, and more widespread and uniform use of the best existing methods.Document ID19860011384Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBesuner, P. M.*(Failure Analysis Associates, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, United States)*Harris, D. O.*(Failure Analysis Associates, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, United States)*Thomas, J. M.*(Failure Analysis Associates, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1986Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-3957NAS 1.26:3957Accession Number86N20855Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-34746Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860011384.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6145

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALTON BERNARD COUTHER, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:12-cr-00187-RAJ-TEM-1)

Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: April 21, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alton Bernard Couther, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alton Bernard Couther, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2018) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

United States v. Couther, No. 2:12-cr-00187-RAJ-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2020). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
### §8478a. Investigative authority

Any authority available to the Secretary of Labor under section 504 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 is hereby made available to the Secretary of Labor, and any officer designated by the Secretary of Labor, to determine whether any person has violated, or is about to violate, any provision of section 8477 or 8478.

(Added Pub. L. 99–556, title I, §110(a), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3132.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 504 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, referred to in text, is classified to section 1134 of Title 29, Labor.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

            Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Duquesne Light
Company for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Frosina C. Cordisco, as
Vice President and Treasurer of Duquesne Light Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 (3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duquesne
     Light Company.

     WITNESS the due execution hereof this 14/th/ day of August, 2002.

                                         /s/ Frosina C. Cordisco
                                         --------------------------
                                         Frosina C. Cordisco
                                         Vice President and Treasurer
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)

     This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Duquesne Light Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
AMENDING TRUST AGREEMENT





Exhibit 10.4

AMENDING TRUST AGREEMENT


THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference the 1st day of January, 2006.



BETWEEN: 


  Knightsbridge RESOURCES, INC., a company duly incorporated under the
  laws of the State of Nevada and having a registered office at 50 West Liberty
  Street, Suite 880, Reno Nevada.

 



("Knightsbridge") 

  
 

AND: 


  RON SCHMITZ, businessman, having an office at 609 Granville Street,
  Suite 1260, Vancouver, British Columbia V7Y 1G5 

  ("Trustee") 

 


WHEREAS: 

	Knightsbridge and Trustee entered into a trust agreement dated for reference
 November 15, 2002 ("Trust Agreement"); 

 
	The Trust Agreement was to expire January 1, 2006; and 

 
	The parties have agreed to extend the expiry date of the Trust Agreement.


NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of the premises
and the mutual promises, covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties
hereto agree as follows: 

	Subsection 2(1) of the Trust Agreement is replaced with the following: 

 "2.1 This Agreement will terminate on: 

 (a) January 01, 2008, unless on or before that date; or 

 (b) on the date that Knightsbridge terminates in writing this agreement; or 

 (c) the date on which Knightsbridge incorporates a British Columbia subsidiary
 to hold Knightsbridge's interest in the Claims and transfers such interest to
 the subsidiary."

 

	All other terms of the Trust Agreement will remain the same.

  
	The Trust Agreement remains in full force and effect except as expressly
 amended by this Amending Agreement. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above written. 


KNIGHTSBRIDGE RESOURCES, INC. 

 


/S/ Ron Schmitz                        


Per: Ron Schmitz

Director and Officer

 


TRUSTEE:

/s/ Ron Schmitz                      


Ron Schmitz, as Trustee
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of R.H. Donnelley
Corporation as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    SVP and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 9, 2005
    
    November 9, 2005
  81
**Exhibit 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT**

 
| **Entity**                                    | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
| Serologicals Finance Company                  |       | Delaware                          |
| Serologicals Royalty Company                  |       | Delaware                          |
| Celliance Corporation                         |       | Delaware                          |
| Serologicals Research Products, Inc.     |       | Delaware                          |
| Serologicals Global Holding Company Limited   |       | United Kingdom                    |
| Upstate Group, L.L.C.                         |       | Delaware                          |
| Serologicals Investment Company               |       | Delaware                          |
| AltaGen Biosciences, Inc.                |       | California                        |
| Celliance Kankakee, Inc.                 |       | Delaware                          |
| Celliance Lawrence, Inc.                 |       | Delaware                          |
| Celliance Milford, Inc.                  |       | Massachusetts                     |
| Intergen Biomanufacturing Corporation         |       | Delaware                          |
| Chemicon International, Inc.             |       | California                        |
| Serologicals European Holding Company Limited |       | United Kingdom                    |
| Upstate USA, Inc.                        |       | New York                          |
| Upstate Limited                               |       | United Kingdom                    |
| Upstate GmbH                                  |       | Germany                           |
| Celliance BioServices, Inc.              |       | California                        |
| Celliance Toronto, Inc.                  |       | Ontario, Canada                   |
| Chemicon Specialty Media, Inc.           |       | Delaware                          |
| Chemicon Australia, Pty.                      |       | Australia                         |
| Serologicals UK Holding Company Limited       |       | United Kingdom                    |
| Chemicon Europe Limited                       |       | United Kingdom                    |
| Celliance Limited                             |       | United Kingdom                    |
| Cymbus Biotech Limited                        |       | United Kingdom                    |
| Serologicals Hong Kong Limited                |       | Hong Kong                         |

 

----
### **CHAPTER 1007—RESOURCE MANAGEMENT**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—SYSTEM RESOURCE INVENTORY AND MANAGEMENT

Sec.
100701.
Protection, interpretation, and research in System.
100702.
Research mandate.
100703.
Cooperative study units.
100704.
Inventory and monitoring program.
100705.
Availability of System units for scientific study.
100706.
Integration of study results into management decisions.
100707.
Confidentiality of information.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—SYSTEM UNIT RESOURCE PROTECTION

100721.
Definitions.
100722.
Liability.
100723.
Actions.
100724.
Use of recovered amounts.
100725.
Donations.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—MINING ACTIVITY WITHIN SYSTEM UNITS

100731.
Findings and declaration.
100732.
Preservation and management of System units by Secretary; promulgation of regulations.
100733.
Recordation of mining claims; publication of notice.
100734.
Report on finding or notification of potential damage to natural and historical landmarks.
100735.
Civil actions for just compensation by mining claim holders.
100736.
Acquisition of land by Secretary.
100737.
Financial disclosure by officer or employee of Secretary.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—ADMINISTRATION

100751.
Regulations.
100752.
Destruction of animals and plant life.
100753.
Disposal of timber.
100754.
Relinquishment of legislative jurisdiction.
100755.
Applicability of other laws.
Order entered July 14, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01333-CR

EILEEN FRANCES NORTH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-35144-L

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s motion to reconsider the briefing order.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the amended brief tendered as of the date of 

this order.

We ORDER the State to file its brief within THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### Michael Lukanik, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Irma Lukanik et al., Appellants, v. Mary L. Atkinson, Respondent.

In a negligence action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries, and by his mother to recover damages for medical expenses and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Moiuit Vernon, dated October 20,1960 and entered October 25, 1960 after trial upon a jury’s verdict, dismissing the complaint on the merits. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### Marine Trust Company of Western New York, Respondent, v. John L. Collins et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying defendants’ motion to vacate a notice of examination before trial.) Present-— Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
Exhibit35.1



CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE



The undersigned hereby certifies that she is the
duly elected and acting Assistant Treasurer-Corporate Finance and Cash Management of Public Service Company of New Hampshire, as servicer
(the “Servicer”) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2018, (the “Servicing Agreement”),
between the Servicer and PSNH Funding LLC 3 (the “Issuer”), and further certifies on behalf of the Servicer that:



1.       In
my capacity as Assistant Treasurer-Corporate Finance and Cash Management of the Servicer, I am responsible for assessing the Servicer’s
compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to the Servicer set forth in the Servicing Agreement and Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB;



2.       A review
of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 has
been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB and Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement;
and



3.       To
the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its material obligations in all material respects
under the Servicing Agreement throughout the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 except as listed on Annex A hereto.



4.       Deloitte
 & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on its assessment of compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria as of December 31, 2021, and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021.



Executed as of this 25th day of March
2022.



| | By: | /s/ Emilie G. O’Neil                                             
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Emilie G. O’Neil                                           
| |     | Title: Assistant Treasurer- Corporate Finance and Cash Management













ANNEX A



LIST OF SERVICER DEFAULTS



|Nature of Default | Status
|----------------- | ------



None.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, Group
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Duke Energy Carolinas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Carolinas.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID L. HAUSER                     
|David L. Hauser                            
|Group Executive and Chief Financial Officer
|August 13, 2007
1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-30654 Summary Calendar

DOLORES M. OUBRE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana

March 10, 1998

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Dolores M. Oubre filed suit against Entergy Operations, Inc . (Entergy) on

September 26, 1995. Oubre alleged that she was constructively discharged from

employment by En tergy in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

(ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq

. and LSA-R.S. 23: 972 and 51: 2231, et seq

. Entergy

filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that Oubre had waived her right

to bring this action by executing a release which waived all cl aims relating to her

employment. Entergy further argued that Oubre ratified the release by accepting and

not returning the consideration given to her in exchange for her execution of the release.2

The district court granted Entergy’s motion in accordance with our decisions in

Blakeney v. Lomas Information Systems, Inc.

, 65 F.3d 482 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied

,

116 S.Ct. 1042 (1996), and W amsley v. Champlin Refining & Chemicals, Inc.

, 11 F.3d

534 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 115 S.Ct. 1403 (1995). We affirmed. See Oubre v.

Entergy Operations, Inc.

, No. 96-30654 (5th Cir. Nov. 6, 1996) (per curiam). The

Supreme Court reversed. S ee Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.

, 118 S.Ct. 838 (1998).

Accordingly, the distri ct court’s order of May 23, 1996, granting summary

judgment is REVERSED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for proceedings

consistent with the Supreme Court’s pronouncement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                               5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0000764763
<NAME>       Triangle Imaging Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                   U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                            229,423
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     912,241
<ALLOWANCES>                      105,000
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,082,841
<PP&E>                          1,121,362
<DEPRECIATION>                    833,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3,894,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,825,129
<BONDS>                         1,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              13,012
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                     (1,328,735)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,894,406
<SALES>                         7,608,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                7,608,904
<CGS>                           2,272,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,272,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                9,638,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                130,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (4,432,593)
<INCOME-TAX>                      226,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (4,658,593)
<DISCONTINUED>                   (473,771)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (5,132,364)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.43)
        

</TABLE>
#### Briell-Rodgers Cotton Goods Company, appellant, v. F. Lewald & Company, appellee.

Gen. No. 29,551.

Action for price of goods sold. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Daniel P. Trude, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Johnston, J., dissenting.

Opinion filed May 11, 1925.

Van Matt a & King, for appeEant.

Urion, Drueker, Reichmann & Boutell, for appeEee.

Mr. Justice Matehett

deEvered the opinion of the court.
M. P. No. 77-213.

#### Thomas Firth *v.*William Laurie *et al.*

Treating the petition for habeas corpus as a motion for bail pending appeal pursuant to Rule 9, the respondent is directed to file his answer to the motion and therein to *show cause,*if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed, said answer to be made in compliance with the provisions of Rule 14, to which reference is made herein.

The petitioner is directed to file the transcript of the hearing in Superior Court in which he was denied bail.

Bevilacqua, *952C. J., not participating.

*Bevilacqua & Cicilline, John F. Cicilline,*for petitioner.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for respondent.