alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.3



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Duquesne Light Company (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Morgan K. OBrien, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (5) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 8thday of November, 2005.



/s/ Morgan K. OBrienMorgan K. OBrienPresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Duquesne Light Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The United States Asphalt Refining Company, defendant in error, v. Henry G. Goelitz, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 29,154.

Suit to recover purchase price of merchandise sold. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Claire C. Edwards, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

George E. Woods, for plaintiff in error; Roy S. Gaskill, of counsel.

Newman, Poppenhusen, Stern & Johnston, for defendant in error; Edward R. Johnston, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 536.113 Assistance to foreign forces for claims arising under international agreements (as to claims arising in the United States).

As claims arising from activities of members of NATO, Partnership for Peace, Singaporean, or Australian forces in the United States are processed in the same manner as those arising from activities of U.S. government personnel. All JAs and legal offices will provide assistance similar to that provided to U.S. armed services personnel.
#### Edward T. Roehner, Appellant, v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Respondent.

Order, entered on July 19, 1963, denying plaintiff’s motion to review and retax defendant’s bill of costs, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant, and the motion granted striking the item of $252.36 from the bill of costs. The supplemental papers were not properly made part of the printed record on appeal under former rule 234 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.
Third District.

#### Willis McGrew, defendant in error, v. William W. Wheelock and William G. Bierd, receivers of Chicago & Alton Railroad Company, plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 7,778.

Action for personal' injuries sustained in collision with train. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. E. S. Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924. Opinion modified and refiled April 7, 1925.

Reversed with finding of fact.

Opinion filed December 31, 1924.

Rehearing denied June 17, 1925.

William L. Patton and Silas H. Strawn, for plaintiffs in error.

Pain & Baker and L. E. Stone, for defendant in error; L. E. Stone, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice

Shurtleff delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 226.5 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) (DUSD(I&E)), under the authority, direction and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall administer the program and issue such supplemental guidance as is necessary.
( b ) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall provide guidance on the use of Department of Defense funds to finance the items issued in support of the Shelter for the Homeless program.
( c ) The Secretaries of the Military Departments shall: ( 1 ) Implement the Shelter for the Homeless program.
( 2 ) Appoint a senior manager to monitor the program within the Department and to provide any assistance that may be required to the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) (ODUSD(I&E)). Such official, after consultation with the ODUSD(I&E), shall approve or disapprove all requests to establish a shelter in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2556 and this part.
( 3 ) Ensure that upon receipt of a formal request for assistance, as defined in § 226.3(h) of this part, the Military Department concerned provides an appropriate response to the requester within 30 days.
( 4 ) Ensure that each Installation Commander is informed about the Program and the types of assistance that they may provide as authorized by 10 U.S.C. 2556.
( d ) Department of Defense Installation Commanders shall: ( 1 ) Acknowledge all requests for assistance.
( 2 ) Upon receipt of a request, initiate such action as is necessary to determine the availability of facilities at that installation for use as a shelter for the homeless.
( 3 ) Forward each request, through the chain of command, to the Service Senior Manager with a copy to the DUSD(I&E). The Installation Commander's recommendation shall accompany each request.
[52 FR 42638, Nov. 6, 1987. Redesignated and amended at 78 FR 21257, Apr. 10, 2013]
### §1351. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §351, 52 Stat. 60, set forth the legislative findings relating to rice marketing quotas pursuant to this subpart and was omitted in view of the repeal of the remaining sections of the subpart.
§ 26.400 What are my responsibilities as a(n) DOD Component awarding official? As a(n) DOD Component awarding official, you must obtain each recipient's agreement, as a condition of the award, to comply with the requirements in— ( a ) Subpart B of this part, if the recipient is not an individual; or
( b ) Subpart C of this part, if the recipient is an individual.
July 23, 2015

Mr. Ryan Wellvang

723 South Wisconsin Ave nue

Rice Lake, WI 54868

Dear Mr. Wellvang:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§§ 91.7(a), 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.405, 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2)

, and 91.417(a)

and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your May 18 , 2015

, exemption request into the public docket

(No. FAA− 2015

− 1754 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The

information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed ). For

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Avia tion Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions , you may call the 33 3 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999

.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst Airmen and Airspace

Rules Division

Enclosure3
#### § 536.126 Purpose of UCMJ claims.

This subpart sets forth the standards to apply and the procedures to follow in processing claims for the wrongful taking or willful damage or destruction of property by military members of the Department of the Army.
#### In the Matter of Manuel Messing et al., Appellants, v. Stephen A. Coffey, as Superintendent of Buildings of the Village of Freeport, Inc., Respondent; Jerome Bricker, Intervenor-Respondent.

The appeal herein having been discontinued by stipulation of the parties, the motion to dismiss the appeal is withdrawn. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            8586
<SECURITIES>                                   1063606
<RECEIVABLES>                                 22437705
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 23763
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                23533660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2059312
<BONDS>                                       21242798
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        184960
<OTHER-SE>                                       41652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  23533660
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3339636
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3327232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3217819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  12404
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Philip A. Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of Erie Family Life Insurance
Company, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Erie Family
Life Insurance Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors:  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 13, 2004 /s/ Philip A. Garcia
Philip A. Garcia, Executive Vice President & CFO
 31
### SUBCHAPTER III—RESEARCH FACILITIES
C. A. No. 75-257.

#### State *v.*Anthony Merola.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Nancy Marks Rahmes,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for petitioner.

*Bevilacqua & Cicilline, John F. Cicilline,*for defendant.

Petition for reargument is denied.

Bevilacqua, C.J. did not participate.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 /s/ Richard L. Travis, Jr.Richard L. Travis, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
Date: December 24, 2008 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements listed on page 2 and 3 of this Form 10-Q and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001060513
<NAME> PARAGON CORPORATE HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          15,394
<SECURITIES>                                     1,001
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,313
<INVENTORY>                                     56,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,887
<PP&E>                                          37,725
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,555
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,909)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   213,925
<SALES>                                         57,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,160
<CGS>                                           43,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   573
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,679)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     905
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,774)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Charles Thomas Ross, Jr.

Application by an attorney from the State of West Virginia for admission to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in this State. Application granted. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 221.1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of the overall part is to implement policy, assign responsibilities, and provide procedures for DoD personnel identification.
( b ) This part establishes implementation guidelines for DoD Self-Service (DS) Logon Program.
# Tier I Screen Model Evalua tion **1** U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency
Re uben Baris, M.S. Environmental F ate and E ffects Division Office of P es ticide Pr ogr ams

# Overview • Purpose of a Tier I screen is in te nded t o distinguish between: • Pe sticides that do not pose a risk to bees and those that ma y need additional information • Adult worker bee acut e t ox icity only • This does not include chr onic t ox icity U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency **2**

• This does not include chr onic t ox icity • It does not include larv al tox icity • RQs w ere c alculated and c ompared t o the acut e L OC (0.4) • Pr ovides co ntex t on the function of the Tier I screen for foliar applic ations • Limited acute or al t ox icity data for chemicals with soil applications; ther efore the Briggs model w as not included in this analysis

## Acut e Con ta ct Toxicity fo r Adult Wo rker Bees Wha t wa s included? • Insecticides (n = 22): • 8 chemical gr oups ( e.g. , neonicotinoid , orga nophospha te, carbamate, orga nochlorine, pyr ethr oid, etc.) comprising 7 differ ent modes of action. U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency **3**

orga nochlorine, pyr ethr oid, etc.) comprising 7 differ ent modes of action. • Herbicides (n = 19): • 19 chemical gr oups ( e.g. , triazinone , ur acil, ur ea, anilide, dinitr oaniline, triazine, etc.) comprising 9 differ ent modes of action. • Fungicides (n = 23): • 19 chemical gr oups ( e.g. , carbo xa mide, conaz ole , triaz ole, st ro bilurin , etc.) comprising 15 differ ent modes of action

## Acut e Oral Toxicity fo r Adult Wo rker Bees Wha t wa s included? • Insecticides (n = 29): • 13 chemical gr oups, comprising 6 differ ent modes of action. • Herbicides (n = 19): U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency **4**

• Herbicides (n = 19): • 28 chemical gr oups, comprising 12 differ ent modes of action. • Fungicides (n = 9): • 17 chemical gr oups, comprising 15 differ ent modes of action

## Fo liar Applic ati ons : Summary of Chemicals tha t pass the Tier I cont act ex posure screen Chemical Class n % of RQs < L OC Ko ch and We isser % of RQs < L OC

T - REX Con ta ct Insecticide 22 14% 14% U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency **5** Insecticide 22 14% 14% Herbicide 19 68% 63% Fungicide 23 96% 91%

## Fo liar Applic ati ons : Summary of Chemicals tha t pass the Tier I oral ex posure screen Chemical Class n % of RQs < L OC T - REX Or al Insecticide 29 17% U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency **6** Insecticide 29 17% Herbicide 19 68% Fungicide 9 67%

# Summary • Analysis pr ovides contex t fo r the efficiency of the Tier I scr een • Multiple chemical gr oups and modes of action ar e r epr esen te d U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency **7** of action ar e r epr esen te d • Expect ation is that fewer insecticides will pass the initial scr een compar ed t o Herbicides and Fungicides • Tier I contact/ or al scr een is functioning as e xpect ed (acut e adult to xicity)
#### CARTER v. FOOD LION, INC.

No. 479P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 271

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997.
§ 634.1 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart establishes policy, responsibilities, and procedures for motor vehicle traffic supervision on military installations in the continental United States (CONUS) and overseas areas. This includes but is not limited to the following: ( 1 ) Granting, suspending, or revoking the privilege to operate a privately owned vehicle (POV).
( 2 ) Registration of POVs.
( 3 ) Administration of vehicle registration and driver performance records.
( 4 ) Driver improvement programs.
( 5 ) Police traffic supervision.
( 6 ) Off-installation traffic activities.
( b ) Commanders in overseas areas are authorized to modify these policies and procedures in the following instances: ( 1 ) When dictated by host nation relationships, treaties, and agreements.
( 2 ) When traffic operations under military supervision necessitate measures to safeguard and protect the morale, discipline, and good order in the Services.