alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Morton M. Epstein et al., Respondents, v. Bardonia Park Homes, Inc., Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for breach of a written agreement, under the terms of which defendant agreed at its own cost and expense to widen and deepen a stream which drains the lands of the parties, *981and to do certain other work, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Rockland County, dated September 12, 1960, denying its motion, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta and Christ, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to grant the motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint, with the following memorandum: The agreement provides that defendant “ may enter upon ” plaintiffs’ land *“*for the sole purpose of ” widening and deepening a stream running from defendant’s land to plaintiffs’ land. The complaint contains no allegation to the effect that defendant availed itself of the right of entry, and hence no obligation arose on defendant’s part to perform any of the covenants in the agreement.
Exhibit 10.1
 DEX ONE CORPORATION EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
 [Template for Executive Officers]
 * * * * *
 Participant:
 Grant Date: [      ]
 Number of Shares of
Restricted Stock Granted:
 * * * * *
 Agreement Company Plan
  Incorporation By Reference; Plan Document Receipt .




---



##### 



Grant of Restricted Stock Award .
 Vesting .
  Vesting Date
    
    Number of Shares[       ]
    
    [       ]
  Accelerated Vesting; Committee Discretion Cause Good Reason
 Change in Control Change in Control
 2




---



##### 



Forfeiture
 Certain Definitions Cause Good Reason Change in Control Employment
Agreement
 Period of Restriction; Delivery of Unrestricted Shares .
 Dividends and Other Distributions; Voting .
 Non-Transferability .
 3




---



##### 



Governing Law .
 Withholding of Tax .
 Section 83(b) .
 Securities Representations .
 Securities Act
 4




---



##### 



Entire Agreement; Amendment .
 Notices .
 Acceptance .
 No Right to Service .
 Transfer of Personal Data .
 Compliance with Laws .
 5




---



##### 



Section 409A .
 Binding Agreement; Assignment .
 Headings .
 Counterparts .
 Further Assurances .
 Severability .
 Acquired Rights .
 6




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 DEX ONE CORPORATIONBy:Name:
    Gretchen ZechTitle:
    Senior Vice President, 
Human ResourcesPARTICIPANT[          ] 7
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1512 

Establishing the Congressional Modernization Competition, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. KILMER (for himself, Mr. MORELLE, and Mr. CAREY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Establishing the Congressional Modernization Competition, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional 

4 Modernization Competition Resolution of 2024’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

6 The House of Representatives finds the following: 

7 (1) The House of Representatives was designed 

8 to be the representative branch of government clos9 est to the people. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1512 IH 

1 (2) The House of Representatives must contin2 ually assess its capacity to fulfill its constitutional 

3 responsibilities. 

4 (3) Civic education and citizen participation are 

5 vital components to the continued health of our de6 mocracy. 

7 (4) Research shows that participation in civic 

8 life at an early age allows students to build interest 

9 and skillsets that will keep them engaged citizens 

10 throughout their lives. 

11 (5) Ideas to modernize Congress can and should 

12 come from Americans of different ages, back13 grounds, and walks of life. 

14 (6) It is therefore appropriate for the House of 

15 Representatives to institute a new competition to 

16 both encourage students’ participation in civic life, 

17 while providing Congress with additional rec18 ommendations to modernize and improve its work. 

19 SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL COMPETITION IN EFFECTIVE20 NESS, EFFICIENCY, AND TRANSPARENCY. 

21 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF COMPETITION.—There is 

22 hereby established an academic competition for the pur23 poses of developing ideas for increasing the effectiveness, 

24 efficiency, and transparency of the operations of the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1512 IH 

1 House of Representatives which shall be held each year 

2 among students in each congressional district. 

3 (b) REGULATIONS.—The competition under this sub4 section (a) shall be carried out in accordance with such 

5 regulations as may be prescribed by the Committee on 

6 House Administration, except that the regulations shall 

7 permit the office of a Member to seek guidance from out8 side experts in the fields of government, political science, 

9 and civics education for the purposes of establishing cri10 teria for the selection of competition judges and for the 

11 judgment of competition submissions. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 651.32 Introduction. ( a ) An EA is intended to facilitate agency planning and informed decision-making, helping proponents and other decision makers understand the potential extent of environmental impacts of a proposed action and its alternatives, and whether those impacts (or cumulative impacts) are significant. The EA can aid in Army compliance with NEPA when no EIS is necessary. An EA will be prepared if a proposed action: ( 1 ) Is not an emergency (§ 651.11(b)).
( 2 ) Is not exempt from (or an exception to) NEPA (§ 651.11(a)).
( 3 ) Does not qualify as a CX (§ 651.11(c)).
( 4 ) Is not adequately covered by existing NEPA analysis and documentation (§ 651.19).
( 5 ) Does not normally require an EIS (§ 651.42).
( b ) An EA can be 1 to 25 pages in length and be adequate to meet the requirements of this part, depending upon site-specific circumstances and conditions. Any analysis that exceeds 25 pages in length should be evaluated to consider whether the action and its effects are significant and thus warrant an EIS.
### **CHAPTER 43—FOREIGN MARKET DEVELOPMENT**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS; AGRICULTURAL COUNSELORS AND AGRICULTURAL ATTACHÉS

Sec.
1761.
Foreign markets; collection of information.
1762.
Personnel.
1763.
Transferred.
1764.
Reports and dispatches.
1765.
Foreign service appropriations; applicability.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—UNITED STATES AGRICULTURAL TRADE OFFICES

1765a.
Agricultural Trade Offices.
1765b.
Functions.
1765b–1.
Omitted.
1765c.
Performance of functions in foreign localities.
1765d.
Acquisition of property.
1765d–1.
Repealed.
1765e.
Location of offices.
1765f.
Availability of agency services, personnel, and facilities.
1765g.
Availability of reports and dispatches.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—REPRESENTATION ALLOWANCES, REGULATIONS, GENERAL PROVISIONS, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS

1765h.
Representation allowance.
1766.
Rules and regulations; advance payment for rent and other service; funds for courtesies to foreign representatives.
1766a.
Presidential regulations.
1766b.
Language training for families of officers and employees assigned abroad.
1766c.
Allowances and benefits.
1767.
Authorization of appropriations.
1768.
Foreign Operations Administration unaffected.
1769.
"Agricultural commodity" defined.
#### Doran Lumber Corp. et al., Respondents, v. James Talcott, Inc., Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay of trial pending determination of appeal, dismissed on the ground that the motion papers were not served within the time prescribed by the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR, rule 2214, subd. [b]). Beldock, P.J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10-K.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    .72
<CASH>                                             188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      346
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   655
<PP&E>                                           7,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              666
<BONDS>                                          2,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        577
<COMMON>                                         1,660
<OTHER-SE>                                         213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,629
<SALES>                                          1,254
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,677
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    263
<INCOME-TAX>                                        59
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58


</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R OB ER TO HER

RER A, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. PERR Y , individual a

nd offic ia l c a

pa c i ty ; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 14-56003 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-01873-JAKDTB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia John A. Kronstadt, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2015 ** B e fore : WALLAC E, R AW LINSON, a

n d IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. R obe rto He rre ra , a C a lifornia sta te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging tha t de fe nda nts viola te d his c onstitutiona

l rights in obta

i ning a sta te c ourt c rim ina l c onvic tion. W e have



# FIL ED DEC 16 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo. Gue rre ro v . Gate s , 442 F.3d 697, 703 (9th C ir. 2006) (dismissa l unde r Fe d. R . C i v. P. 12(b)(6)); W hitak e r v . Garc e tti , 486 F.3d 572, 579 (9th C ir. 2007) (dismissa l unde r H e c k v . Humphre

y , 512 U.S. 477 (1994)). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d He rre ra ’ s a c tion for da m a ge s a s He c k

ba rre d be c a use if suc c e ssful, his c la im s would ne c e ssa rily im ply the inva lidity

of his c onvic tion, a

nd He rre ra

ha s not de m onstra

t e d tha t his c onvic tion ha s be e n ove rturne d. Se eHe c k

, 512 U.S. a

t 486-87 (thedistric t

c ourt m ust dismiss a dam a ge s a c tion, whic h, if suc c e ssful, would ne c e ssa rily im ply the inva lidity

of a c onvic tion, a

bse nt a showing tha

t thec onvic tion ha s be e n ove rturne d). He rre ra ’ s m otion for c opie s of c e rta in distric t c o urt doc um e nts, file d on M arc h 16, 2015, is de

nie d a s m oot. AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 5 6 0 0 3 2
"EXHIBIT (3)(C)"

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                      INTERNATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION


        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 4.04 of the Texas Business
Corporation Act, International Bancshares Corporation (the "Corporation") hereby
adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

                                   ARTICLE ONE

      The name of the corporation is International Bancshares Corporation.

                                   ARTICLE TWO

        The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the
Corporation was adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation on May 21, 1998
in conformity with the provisions of the Texas Business Corporation Act.

        Article IV of the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                                   ARTICLE IV

        The aggregate number of shares which the corporation shall have the
        authority to issue is Forty Million (40,000,000) shares of Common Stock
        of the par value of One Dollar ($1.00) per share.

                                  ARTICLE THREE

        The number of shares of the capital stock of the Corporation outstanding
and entitled to vote on the amendment was 11,260,197 shares of Common Stock, par
value $1.00 per share.

                                  ARTICLE FOUR

        The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the
Corporation voted for (representing at least a majority of the shares entitled
to vote on such matter as required by the Articles of Incorporation of the
Corporation) and against the amendment, respectively, are as follows:

                             For:        9,025,257
                             Against:       84,607



                                         35
<PAGE>
                                    ARTICLE FIVE

        The amendment will have no effect on the stated capital of the
Corporation.


        EXECUTED this 22nd day of May, 1998.


                                    INTERNATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION


                                    By: /s/ DENNIS E. NIXON
                                            Dennis E. Nixon, President


                                       36
§ 202.12 Administrative support and eligible expenses. ( a ) *Administrative support.* Subject to the availability of funding, the installation shall provide administrative support to establish and operate a RAB.
( b ) *Eligible administrative expenses for a RAB.* The following activities specifically and directly associated with establishing and operating a RAB shall qualify as an administrative expense of a RAB: ( 1 ) RAB establishment.
( 2 ) Membership selection.
( 3 ) Training if it is: ( i ) Site specific and benefits the establishment and operation of a RAB.
( ii ) Relevant to the environmental restoration activities occurring at the installation.
( 4 ) Meeting announcements.
( 5 ) Meeting facilities.
( 6 ) Meeting facilitators, including translators.
( 7 ) Preparation of meeting agenda materials and minutes.
( 8 ) RAB-member mailing list maintenance and RAB materials distribution.
( c ) *Funding.* Subject to the availability of funds, administrative support to RABs may be funded as follows: ( 1 ) At active installations, administrative expenses for a RAB shall be paid using funds from the Military Component's Environmental Restoration accounts.
( 2 ) At BRAC installations, administrative expenses for a RAB shall be paid using BRAC funds.
( 3 ) At FUDS, administrative expenses for a RAB shall be paid using funds from the Environmental Restoration account for the Formerly Used Defense Sites program.
#### § 552.61 Products and services offered in solicitation.

Products and services, including life insurance, offered and sold on Army installations must comply with the laws of the States (and other civil jurisdictions) in which the installations are located. If a dispute or complaint arises, the applicable State will make the determination (§ 552.56).
### §21025. Reports

#### (a) Reports by recipients

Not later than the 1 6 months after the end of each fiscal year for which an eligible State or eligible unit of local government received a payment under this subpart, the State or unit shall submit a report to the Secretary on the activities conducted with the funds provided during the year, and shall include in the report a list of expenditures made with respect to each category of activities described in section 21021(b) of this title.

#### (b) Report by Secretary to Committees

With respect to each fiscal year for which the Secretary makes payments under this subpart, the Secretary shall submit a report on the activities carried out under this subpart to the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title II, §265, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1699.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15425 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

1 So in original.
§ 516.40 General. ( a ) *Introduction.* This subpart implements DOD Directive 5405.2 (See appendix C to this part and 32 CFR part 97). It governs the release of official information and the appearance of present and former DA personnel as witnesses in response to requests for interviews, notices of depositions, subpoenas, and other requests or orders related to judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings. Requests for records, if not in the nature of legal process, should be processed under AR 25-55 (The Department of the Army Freedom of Information Act Program) or AR 340-21 (The Army Privacy Program). This subpart pertains to any request for witnesses, documents, or information for all types of litigation, including requests by private litigants, requests by State or U.S. attorneys, requests by foreign officials or tribunals, subpoenas for records or testimony, notices of depositions, interview requests, civil cases, criminal proceedings, private litigation, or litigation in which the United States has an interest.
( b ) *Definitions.* (See appendix F to this part).
Exhibit 1.4



                                    Autoriteit
                                    Financiet Markten






Form for the disclosure of securities transactions in the own issuing
institution

<PAGE>

Form for the disclosure of securities transactions in the own issuing
institution



Part 1


1.  Name of issuing institution:                       New Skies Satellites N.V.

2.  Name of person obliged to notify:                  New Skies Satellites N.V.


Sort of security
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3.  Sort of security: Ordinary shares

    (Share/Bond/Option/Warrant/other)

4.  To be filled out if applicable:

      Nominal value of the security:                   0.05 EUR

      Optional series (call option/put option):

      Exercise price:

      Expiration date:


Transaction in the security indicated in questions 3 and 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


5.  Date of the transaction:                           10-03-03

6a. Number of securities acquired in the transaction:  1,747

 b. Number of securities sold in the transaction:

7.  Price of the securities:                           3.75EUR

8. Open/Close (in case of options)





To the best of my knowledge and belief I certify that the information set forth
in this statement is true, complete and correct:


Andrew R. D'Uva Compliance Officer of New Skies Satellites N.V.,
----------------------------------------------------------------
Name

Rooseveltplantsoen 4                                               11 March 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------   -------------
Address                                                            Date

2517 KR The Hague
---------------------------------------------------------------    -------------
Postal code & city & country                                       Signature
131 STAT. 10 PUBLIC LAW 115–5—FEB. 16, 2017 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 38: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Feb. 1, considered and passed House. Considered in Senate. 

Feb. 2, considered and passed Senate. 

DAILY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS (2017): 

Feb. 16, Presidential remarks. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–5 

115th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known as 

the Stream Protection Rule. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Office of Surface Mining 

Reclamation and Enforcement of the Department of the Interior 

relating to the ‘‘Stream Protection Rule’’ (published at 81 Fed. 

Reg. 93066 (December 20, 2016)), and such rule shall have no 

force or effect. 

Approved February 16, 2017. 

Feb. 16, 2017 

[H.J. Res. 38] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
Re: *** Disregard MATS Briefing I Sent You   RobertJ Wayland to: Higgins, Cortney 11/14/2011 04:04 PM Cc: Bill Maxwell

Cortney -

Attached below is the revised briefing package for tomorrow. I apologize for the confusion, but Bill/I weren't on the same page with the CAMD folks on the IPM slides!

sorry!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

** ******************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

*********************************************************

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/14/2011 02:56 PM Subject: Re: *** Disregard MATS Briefing I Sent You  

Thanks! Looking forward to the revised version.

----- Original Message ----- From: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 02:28 PM To: Higgins, Cortney Subject: ** * Disregard MATS Briefing I Sent You ****

Cortney -

We've updated the IPM slides for tomorrow's briefing, so I will besending you a revised version later this afternoon - please use that version. Sorry for the confusion.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

*********************************************************

MATS OMB Briefing 111511a.pptx