alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 20, 2005



FORM 6-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549   Report of Foreign Private Issuer  Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Annual Report Prepared Pursuant to an Indenture 
for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 and Exhibits thereto

DYNEA INTERNATIONAL OY

18-20 A Siltasaarenkatu, Helsinki, Finland and DYNEA CHEMICALS OY 18-20 A Siltasaarenkatu, Helsinki, Finland


> Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

| | Form 20-F | Form 40-F
| | --------- | ---------

> Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
>         1934

| | Yes | No
| | --- | --



> If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):

| | N/A | 
| | --- | 





---

SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| | DYNEA INTERNATIONAL OY  Company
| | -------------------------------
| | /s/ Filip Frankenhaeuser       
| | Name:                          
| | Title:                         
| |                                
| | DYNEA CHEMICALS OY  Company    
| | /s/ Filip Frankenhaeuser       
| | Name:                          
| | Title:                         



Date: April 20, 2005





2

---

Exhibits



|1.1  | Annual Report for Dynea International Oy for the Year Ended December 31,  2004.
|---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|8.1  | Principal subsidiary undertakings as at December 31, 2004.                     
|12.1 | CEO Certificate.                                                               
|12.2 | CFO Certificate.                                                               







3

---
### §3305. Competitive service; examinations; when held

(a) The Office of Personnel Management shall hold examinations for the competitive service at least twice a year in each State and territory or possession of the United States where there are individuals to be examined.

(b) The Office shall hold an examination for a position to which an appointment has been made within the preceding 3 years, on the application of an individual who qualifies as a preference eligible under section 2108(3)(C)–(G) of this title. The examination shall be held during the quarter following the application.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 418; Pub. L. 90–83, §1(8), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 197; Pub. L. 96–54, §2(a)(14), (15), Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 382.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (a) | 5 U.S.C. 635 (last 24 words of 6th sentence). | Jan. 16, 1883, ch. 27, §3 (last 24 words of 6th sentence), 22 Stat. 404. |
| (b) | 5 U.S.C. 859. | June 27, 1944, ch. 287, §10, 58 Stat. 390.Jan. 19, 1948, ch. 1, §3, 62 Stat. 3.Dec. 27, 1950, ch. 1151, §2(b), 64 Stat. 1117. |

Statutes at Large

Jan. 19, 1948, ch. 1, §3, 62 Stat. 3.

Dec. 27, 1950, ch. 1151, §2(b), 64 Stat. 1117.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### 1967 Act

This section amends various sections [§§3305, 3309, 3318] of title 5, United States Code, to reflect the redesignation of paragraphs (3)(B) through (F) of section 2108 of title 5 as paragraphs (3)(C) through (G) by section 1(6) of this bill.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1979—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–54, §2(a)(14), substituted "Office of Personnel Management" for "Civil Service Commission".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 96–54, §2(a)(15), substituted "Office" for "Commission".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–54 effective July 12, 1979, see section 2(b) of Pub. L. 96–54, set out as a note under section 305 of this title.
```

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 248 (Monday, December 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 84308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28577]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive Patent License

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act, and implementing regulations, 
the Department of the Air Force hereby gives notice of its intent to 
grant an exclusive patent license to Inquis Medical Inc., a small 
business having a place of business at 1735 East Bayshore Rd, Suite 4, 
Redwood City, CA 94063.

DATES: Written objections must be filed no later than fifteen (15) 
calendar days after the date of publication of this Notice.

ADDRESSES: Submit written objections to Chastity D. S. Whitaker, Ph.D., 
Air Force Materiel Command Law Office, AFMCLO/JAZ, 2240 B Street, Area 
B, Building 11, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7109; Facsimile: (937) 
255-9318; or Email: [email protected]. Include Docket No. A59-
201208A-PL in the subject line of the message.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chastity D. S. Whitaker, Ph.D., Air 
Force Materiel Command Law Office, AFMCLO/JAZ, 2240 B Street, Area B, 
Building 11, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7109; Telephone: (937) 904-
5787; Facsimile: (937) 255-9318; or Email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Abstract of patent application(s):

    A negative pressure surgical apparatus. The apparatus includes a 
mask configured to cover a portion of the face of a patient and 
including a first port and an instrument port. The first port is 
configured to draw negative pressure from between the mask and the face 
of the patient. The instrument port is configured to receive a medical 
instrument therethrough and form a seal therewith. The instrument port 
is positioned on the mask so as to permit surgery at a surgical site.

Intellectual Property

    --U.S. Application Serial No. 16/985,829, filed on August 5, 2020, 
and entitled Negative pressure oronasal apparatus.
    The Department of the Air Force may grant the prospective license 
unless a timely objection is received that sufficiently shows the grant 
of the license would be inconsistent with the Bayh-Dole Act or 
implementing regulations. A competing application for a patent license 
agreement, completed in compliance with 37 CFR 404.8 and received by 
the Air Force within the period for timely objections, will be treated 
as an objection and may be considered as an alternative to the proposed 
license.

Adriane Paris,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020-28577 Filed 12-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Cost of Clothing for Moderate-Income Families, 1935-44

              																	Schell, Emil D.					,	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	Brown, Laura Mae. 						*Cost of Clothing for Moderate-Income Families, 1935-44 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 789*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4264,			accessed on September 11, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of R.H. Donnelley
Corporation as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial OfficerJuly 27, 2007
    
    July 27, 2007
  44
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                10,565
<SECURITIES>                          16,038
<RECEIVABLES>                         44,749
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           10,269
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      85,646
<PP&E>                                54,103
<DEPRECIATION>                        40,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        125,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 43,073
<BONDS>                               36,574
<COMMON>                              8,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           61
<OTHER-SE>                            31,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          125,180
<SALES>                               27,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      27,227
<CGS>                                 20,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         25,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      25
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       2,020
<INCOME-TAX>                          600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   1,161
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          1,161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .15
        

</TABLE>
#### Harry Shapiro v. New York City Transit Authority.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### FRENCH v. CITY OF ROCHESTER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 27, 1903.)

Action by Porter M. French against the city of Rochester.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted.
Consent to Independent Auditors


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
USMX, INC.:

     We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements
(No. 33-16194,  33-16195, 33-38855, 33-49392, 33-68882 and 33-63599) on Form S-8
and  registration  statement  (No.  333-03561) on Form S-3 of USMX,  INC. of our
report dated March 11, 1997 relating to the consolidated statements of financial
position of USMX,  INC. and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related  consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended  December 31,
1996,  which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-KA
of USMX, INC.

     Our report  contains an explanatory  paragraph that states that the Company
has incurred  cost overruns  associated  with the  construction  of the Illinois
Creek Mine, has cash flow deficits from operations and currently has no mines in
operation.  At December  31,  1996,  the Company has an  accumulated  deficit of
$3,065,000, a working capital deficit of approximately $27,132,000 and is not in
compliance with certain covenants of its long term debt agreements. In addition,
significant  additional  funds will be required to bring the Company's  Illinois
Creek Mine into  production.  These  matters raise  substantial  doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do no
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


                                                      KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Denver, Colorado
May 5, 1997
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1*


Section 1350 Certification


        I, Richard M. Haddock, the chief executive officer of LaserCard
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certify pursuant to section
1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to our knowledge:

        (i)     the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and

        (ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: February 8, 2005


/s/ Richard M. Haddock
----------------------
Richard M. Haddock


-----------------------

* The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed "filed" with the SEC
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.


                                       40
Non-competition/non-solicitation agreement of Paula A. Vinson



 Exhibit 10.4 
 NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT 
 This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 24th day of January,
2006, between HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION., a Washington corporation (“Heritage”) and Paula Vinson (“Executive”), the Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice-President of Western Washington Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”)
and/or Washington State Bank, NA. (the “Bank”) (Bancorp and the Bank, collectively, being the “Company”). 
 Recitals 
 1. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and the Plan of Mergers dated as of the
     day of                     , 2006 (the “Plan”) among Heritage and the Company, Bancorp will be
merged into Heritage, and the Bank will be merged into Heritage Bank. 
 2. The obligation of Heritage to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the Plan is conditioned upon its receipt of non-competition agreements from Executives of the Company. 
 3. Executive is a
shareholder of Bancorp. 
 Agreement 
 Executive also agrees that during this two (2) year period, Executive (or any agent acting on behalf of Executive) will not directly or indirectly solicit or attempt to solicit on behalf or for the benefit of any
financial institution (i) any employees of the Company, Heritage, or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates, to leave their employment for employment with another financial institution or (ii) any customers of the Company, Heritage, or
any of their subsidiaries or affiliates to remove their business from the Company, Heritage, or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates. Solicitation prohibited under this section includes solicitation by any means, including, without limitation,
meetings, telephone calls, letters or other mailings, electronic communication of any kind, and internet communications. 
 Executive
recognizes and agrees that any breach of this Agreement by her will entitle Heritage and any of its successors or assigns to injunctive relief and/or specific performance, as well as any other legal or equitable remedies to which such entities may
otherwise be entitled. The substantially prevailing party in any such dispute will be entitled to recover from the other party its costs and expenses, including specifically, reasonable attorneys’ fees. 
 The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and the invalidity of any provision will not affect the validity of other provisions. If a court of
competent jurisdiction deems that the duration, geographic scope, or other restriction imposed by this Agreement is unenforceable, such court may reform the restriction as is necessary to make such restriction enforceable. 
 Executed as of the 24th day of January, 2006. 
  

					
	HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION	 	EXECUTIVE
			
	By:	 	  
	 	  

	Its:
#### STATE v. MEDLEY

No. 460P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App.-(2 September 1997)

Motion by defendant for temporary stay allowed 17 September 1997.
### [3128-01] Title 10-Energy
CHAPTER II-FEDERAi. ENERGY ADMINISTRATION 1
PART 

### 430-ENERGY CONSERVATION

PROGRAM FOR APPLIANCES Indefinite Suspension of Final Test

Procedures for Water Heaters AGENCY:DepartmentofEnergy, ACTION: Suspensionoffinalrule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy, by separate notice issued today, is proposing 

### an amendment to 

### its test procedures for water heaters, 10 CFR Part 430, Subpart B. Pending the hearing on this proposal and prescription of the final rule, the provisions of 10 CFR 430.22(e)(2) are hereby suspended. EFFECTIVEDATE:March 29, 1978. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

JamesA. Smith, <Office ofConservation and Solar Applications), Old Post Office Building, Room 307,

lEDITORIAL NOTE: It Is contemplated that Chapter II will be renamed at a future date to reflect the fact that it contains regulations administered by the Department of Energy, including regulations administered by the Office of Conservationand SolarAp- plications. 

## 13865

12th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20461, 202-566-4635. William J. Dennison, (Office of the General Counsel), 12th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue 1'1"'W., Room 7148, Washington, D.C. 20461, 202- 566-9750. SuPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 10 CFR 430.22(e)(2) is hereby suspendeduntilfurther notice.

Issued in Wa.shin.gton, D.C., March 29, 1978.
WILLIAM S. HEFFELFINGER, Directorof Administration. CFR Doc. 78-8659Filed 3-31-78; 8:45 amJ

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 43, NO. 64-MONDAY, APRIL 3, 1978
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Jack C. BridgesJack C. Bridges Executive
Vice-PresidentMay 10, 2007Date
### §103. Use of appropriated funds

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, any report, notification, or consultation addressing directly or indirectly the use of appropriated funds and stipulated by this chapter to be submitted to, or held with, the Congress or any Congressional committee shall also be submitted to, or held with, the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives under the same conditions and with the same restrictions as stipulated by this chapter.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1714, as added Pub. L. 108–7, div. L, §103(5), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 529.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, known as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1714 of Pub. L. 107–296 amended section 300aa–33 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 108–7, div. L, §102(a), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 528.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Notifications for Reprogramming or Transfer of Funds

Pub. L. 109–90, title V, §503(e), Oct. 18, 2005, 119 Stat. 2082, provided that: "Hereafter, notwithstanding any other provision of law, notifications pursuant to this section or any other authority for reprogramming or transfer of funds shall be made solely to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives."
### **CHAPTER 14—AGENCY CHIEF HUMAN CAPITAL OFFICERS**

Sec.
1401.
Establishment of agency Chief Human Capital Officers.
1402.
Authority and functions of agency Chief Human Capital Officers.
§ 1701.20 Exemption policies. ( a ) *General.* The DNI has determined that invoking exemptions under the Privacy Act and continuing exemptions previously asserted by agencies whose records ODNI receives is necessary: to ensure against the release of classified information essential to the national defense or foreign relations; to protect intelligence sources and methods; and to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of intelligence, investigative and law enforcement processes. Accordingly, as authorized by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, subsections (j) and (k), and in accordance with the rulemaking procedures of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, the ODNI shall: ( 1 ) Exercise its authority pursuant to subsections (j) and (k) of the Privacy Act to exempt certain ODNI systems of records or portions of systems of records from various provisions of the Privacy Act; and
( 2 ) Continue in effect and assert all exemptions claimed under Privacy Act subsections (j) and (k) by an originating agency from which the ODNI obtains records where the purposes underlying the original exemption remain valid and necessary to protect the contents of the record.
( b ) *Related policies.* ( 1 ) The exemptions asserted apply to records only to the extent they meet the criteria of subsections (j) and (k) of the Privacy Act, whether claimed by the ODNI or the originator of the records.
( 2 ) Discretion to supersede exemption: Where complying with a request for access or amendment would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect a counterterrorism or law enforcement interest, and unless prohibited by law, the D/IMO may exercise his discretion to waive the exemption. Discretionary waiver of an exemption with respect to a record will not obligate the ODNI to waive the exemption with respect to any other record in an exempted system of records. As a condition of such discretionary access, ODNI may impose any restrictions (*e.g.*, concerning the location of file reviews) deemed necessary or advisable to protect the security of agency operations, information, personnel, or facilities.
( 3 ) Records in ODNI systems also are subject to protection under 50 U.S.C. 403-1(i), the provision of the National Security Act of 1947 which requires the DNI to protect intelligence sources and methods from unauthorized disclosure.