alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005019EN.01002901.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/29

---

Action brought on 1 October 2004 by Sumitomo Chemical (UK) PLC against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-403/04)

(2005/C 19/61)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 1 October 2004 by Sumitomo Chemical (UK) PLC, London, (United Kingdom), represented by K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Order the defendant to respond to the applicant's request; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to respond to the applicant's request;

| — | Or, in the alternative, order the annulment of the European Commission's act D 341571(04); |
| --- | --- |

—

Or, in the alternative, order the annulment of the European Commission's act D 341571(04);

| — | Order the defendant to compensate the applicant in the provisional amount of 1 euro for damages suffered as a result of the defendant's failure to comply with its obligations under Community law by failing to respond to the applicant, or, in the alternative, as a result of the European Commission's act D 341571(04), as well as any applicable interests, pending the exact calculation and determination of the exact amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to compensate the applicant in the provisional amount of 1 euro for damages suffered as a result of the defendant's failure to comply with its obligations under Community law by failing to respond to the applicant, or, in the alternative, as a result of the European Commission's act D 341571(04), as well as any applicable interests, pending the exact calculation and determination of the exact amount;

| — | Order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law invoked are similar to those invoked in Case T-400/04, Arch Chemicals and Arch Timber Protection/Commission.

---
<PAGE>

EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION


                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Randall W. White certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Educational Development
Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date October 14, 2003                       By /s/ Randall W. White
     -----------------                         ---------------------------------
                                               Randall W. White
                                               President and Chief Executive
                                               Officer
### §1391. Authorization of appropriations; loans from Commodity Credit Corporation

(a) Beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 1938, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated, for each fiscal year for the administration of this chapter and for the making of soil conservation and other payments such sums as Congress may determine, in addition to any amount made available pursuant to section 590o of title 16.

(b) For the administration of this chapter (and the provisions of chapter 36 of this title) during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1938, there is hereby authorized to be made available from the funds appropriated for such fiscal year for carrying out the purposes of sections 590g, 590h, 590i, and 590j to 590q of title 16, a sum not to exceed $5,000,000.

(c) During each fiscal year, beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 1941, the Commodity Credit Corporation is authorized and directed to loan to the Secretary such sums, not to exceed $50,000,000, as he estimates will be required during such fiscal year, to make crop insurance premium advances and to make advances pursuant to the applicable provisions of sections 590h and 590l of title 16, in connection with programs applicable to crops harvested in the calendar year in which such fiscal year ends, and to pay the administrative expenses of county agricultural conservation associations for the calendar year in which such fiscal year ends. The sums so loaned during any fiscal year shall be transferred to the current appropriation available for carrying out sections 590g, 590h, 590i, and 590j to 590q of title 16 and shall be repaid, with interest at a rate to be determined by the Secretary but not less than the cost of money to the Commodity Credit Corporation for a comparable period, during the succeeding fiscal year from the appropriation available for that year or from any unobligated balance of the appropriation for any other year.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §391, 52 Stat. 69; July 2, 1940, ch. 521, §8, 54 Stat. 728.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1940—Subsec. (c). Act July 2, 1940, added subsec. (c).

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Administration of program of Commodity Credit Corporation transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §501, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7877, 60 Stat. 1100, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Exceptions From Transfer of Functions

Functions of Corporations of Department of Agriculture, boards of directors and officers of such corporations; Advisory Board of Commodity Credit Corporation; and Farm Credit Administration or any agency, officer, or entity of, under, or subject to supervision of said Administration excepted from functions of officers, agencies, and employees transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, effective June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9988 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9988

   To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Transportation to issue regulations to ensure airfare fairness in the 
        wake of a disaster or emergency, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2024

Ms. Velazquez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Transportation to issue regulations to ensure airfare fairness in the 
        wake of a disaster or emergency, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Airline Freeze of Astronomical 
Increases in Rates Act'' or the ``AirFAIR Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCESSIVE AVIATION TICKET PRICE INCREASES DURING DISASTERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 41712 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Excessive Ticket Price Increases During Disasters.--
            ``(1) In general.--It shall be an unfair or deceptive 
        practice under subsection (a) for any ticket agent, air 
        carrier, foreign air carrier, or other person offering to sell 
        tickets for air transportation to impose an excessive increase 
        in the price of such tickets in circumstances related to a 
        disaster or emergency.
            ``(2) Regulations.--The Secretary shall issue regulations 
        to establish standards for determining whether an increase in a 
        ticket price is excessive for purposes of paragraph (1). At a 
        minimum, the standards shall ensure that an increase of 30 
        percent or more is treated as being excessive.
            ``(3) Definitions.--In this section, the terms `disaster' 
        or `emergency' means a disaster or emergency as declared by a 
        State, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession 
        of the United States.''.
    (b) Unfair Ticket Pricing Practices.--
            (1) Study.--The Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
        Administration shall conduct a study on whether any ticket 
        agent, air carrier, foreign air carrier, or other person 
        offering to sell tickets for air transportation has engaged in 
        unfair practices in the sale of such tickets in circumstances 
        related to a disaster or emergency.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to 
        Congress a report on the results of the study.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1907.26 Prohibition on adverse action.

Agency correspondence to the challenger shall include a notice that CIA will take no adverse action or retribution against the challenger for bringing the classification challenge in good faith.

[76 FR 59032, Sept. 23, 2011]
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2006

# FORM 6-K

# SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
  Washington, D.C. 20549

Report of Foreign Private Issuer 
  Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934For the month of**April**2006

TELE2 AB(Translation of registrants name into English)

Skeppsbron 18
  Box 2094
  S103 13 Stockholm
  Sweden
  (Address of principal executive offices)

> Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

|
|

> Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

|
|

> If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
>     ..................................................N/A.......................................................................................................................................

---











FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

April 10, 2006







CHANGES TO FINANCIAL CALENDAR 2006



Stockholm  Tele2 AB (Tele2), (Stockholmsbörsen: TEL2A and TEL2B), announces the following changed dates for the releases of its quarterly results statements for 2006:

| | Q1 2006 Interim Report             | May 3             | 
| | ---------------------------------- | ----------------- | 
| | Q2 2006 Interim Report             | August 1          | 
| | Q3 2006 Interim Report             | November 1        | 
| | Annual General Meeting (Stockholm) | May 10(unchanged)
| |                                    |                   | 



CONTACTS

|Dwayne Taylor | Telephone: | + 44 20 7321 5038
|------------- | ---------- | -----------------
|Lena Krauss   | Telephone: | + 46 8 562 000 45
|              |            |                  

Investor enquiries



Visit us at our homepage:http://www.tele2.com





Tele2 is Europes leading alternative telecom operator. Our mission is to offer cheap and simple telecoms. Tele2 always strives to offer the markets best prices. We have over 30 million customers in 23 countries. Tele2 offers products and services in fixed and mobile telephony, broadband and cable TV. Ever since Jan Stenbeck founded Tele2 in 1993, the company has been a tough challenger to the former government monopolies. Tele2 has been listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange since 1996. In 2005, we reported operating revenue of SEK 50 billion and a profit (EBITDA) of SEK 6.6 billion.





---



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



TELE2 AB 
  By:   /s/ Håkan Zadler
  Name: 
  Title:   CFO
  Date: April 18, 2006
#### In the Matter of Todd H., Respondent. City of New York, Appellant.

Order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 8, 1978, affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see *Matter of Anthony P.,*65 AD2d 294). Latham, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER I—NUTRITION MONITORING AND RELATED RESEARCH
#### § 536.42 Constitutional torts.

A claim for violation of the U.S. Constitution does not constitute a state tort and is not cognizable under any subpart. A constitutional claim will be scrutinized in order to determine whether it is totally or partially payable as a state tort. For example, a Fifth Amendment taking may be payable in an altered form as a real estate claim. For further discussion see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-36.
#### Irving Kessler, Appellant-Respondent, v. Estelle Kessler, Respondent-Appellant.

In an action by plaintiff husband for separation, in which the defendant wife counter-claimed for a separation, the parties cross-appeal as follows from portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered July 30, 1962 upon the decision of the court, after a nonjury trial, which (a) denied both parties a separation; (b) granted defendant custody of their three minor children; (e) granted plaintiff certain visitation rights; (d) directed plaintiff to pay defendant $105 a week for the children’s support, allocated at $35 a week for each child; and (e) denied defendant alimony and additional counsel fees: (1) Plaintiff appeals from so much of the judgment as directed him to make said payments and as provided that the visitation rights are to be exercised in part in defendant’s home in Hartford, Connecticut. (2) Defendant appeals from the judgment insofar as it: (a) directed said payments to be made; (b) denied defendant an additional counsel fee; (c) failed to require plaintiff to give notice of his intention ■ to visit the children; and *544(d) failed to require plaintiff to pay for the children’s medical costs and expenses. Judgment modified on the facts, by striking out from the sixth decretal paragraph the provisions fixing the amount of the weekly payments at $105, allocated at $35 a week for each child; and by substituting therefor provisions fixing the amount of the weekly payments at $90, allocated at $30 a week for each child. As so modified the judgment is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the amount fixed for the support of the children was excessive. Under all the circumstances plaintiff should pay the sum of $30 for the support, maintenance and education of each of the three children. Finding of fact No. 8 is modified accordingly. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### Earth flows: Morphology, mobilization, and movement

By: David K. KeeferArvid M. Johnson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1264

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (11363 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (3942 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (1287 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (5063 pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 507.17 Authority to manufacture. ( a ) The Secretary of Defense has designated the Secretary of the Army to grant certificates of authority for the manufacture and commercial sale of Service flags and Service lapel buttons.
( b ) Any person, firm, or corporation that wishes to manufacture the Service flag or lapel button must apply for a certificate of authority to manufacture from TIOH.
§ 245.15 Appropriate military authority. Appropriate military authority will take the following actions: ( a ) Notify or coordinate, as appropriate, the extent or termination of ESCAT implementation with DOT and DHS.
( b ) Disseminate the extent of ESCAT implementation through the Noble Eagle Conferences and the FAA DEN.
( c ) Specify what restrictions are to be implemented. Some examples of restrictions to be considered include: ( 1 ) Defining the affected area.
( 2 ) Defining the type of aircraft operations that are authorized.
( 3 ) Defining the routing restrictions on flights entering or operating within appropriate portions of the affected area.
( 4 ) Defining restrictions for the volume of air traffic within the affected area, using the EATPL, paragraph 245.22 of this part) and Security Control Authorizations, as required.
( 5 ) Setting altitude limitations on flight operations in selected areas.
( 6 ) Restricting operations to aircraft operators regulated under specified security programs (e.g., the Aircraft Operator Standard Security Program (AOSSP), and the Domestic Security Integration Program (DSIP).
( d ) Revise or remove restrictions on the movement of air traffic as the tactical situation permits.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      15,371,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  180,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,897,000
<PP&E>                                         180,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,187,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          279,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       151,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,908,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,187,000
<SALES>                                      8,565,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,565,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,097,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,411,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,974,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,905,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,069,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,069,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>