alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 37.875 Should my TIA include a provision concerning foreign access to technology? ( a ) Consistent with the objective of enhancing the national security by increasing DoD reliance on the U.S. commercial technology and industrial bases, you must include a provision in the TIA that addresses foreign access to technology developed under the TIA.
( b ) The provision must provide, as a minimum, that any transfer of the: ( 1 ) Technology must be consistent with the U.S. export laws, regulations and policies (*e.g.,* the International Traffic in Arms Regulation at chapter I, subchapter M, title 22 of the CFR (22 CFR parts 120 through 130), the DoD Industrial Security Regulation in DoD 5220.22-R,[3] and the Department of Commerce Export Regulation at chapter VII, subchapter C, title 15 of the CFR (15 CFR parts 730 through 774), as applicable.
( 2 ) Exclusive right to use or sell the technology in the United States must, unless the Government grants a waiver, require that products embodying the technology or produced through the use of the technology will be manufactured substantially in the United States. The provision may further provide that: ( i ) In individual cases, the Government may waive the requirement of substantial manufacture in the United States upon a showing by the recipient that reasonable but unsuccessful efforts have been made to transfer the technology under similar terms to those likely to manufacture substantially in the United States or that under the circumstances domestic manufacture is not commercially feasible.
( ii ) In those cases, the DoD Component may require a refund to the Government of some or all the funds paid under the TIA for the development of the transferred technology.
( c ) You may, but are not required to, seek to negotiate a domestic manufacture condition for transfers of nonexclusive rights to use or sell the technology in the United States, to parallel the one described for exclusive licenses in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if you judge that nonexclusive licenses for foreign manufacture could effectively preclude the establishment of domestic sources of the technology for defense purposes.
[68 FR 47160, Aug. 7, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 51246, Aug. 19, 2020] Footnotes -
37.875
[3] Electronic copies may be obtained at the Washington Headquarters Services Internet site *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives .* Paper copies may be obtained, at cost, from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.
f Date. 7-20-2015

From :

Christopher Wayne Baker

#1301359

Telford Unit \

3899 State Hwy.98

New Boston, TX 75570

TO: The Honorable Clerk

of The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Dear Honorable Clerk. I need to know what my Case No. was in

your Court for my Petition for Discretionary Review(PDR). The

original case number out of the 104th Judicial District court of

Taylor county was 14512-B. The cause number in the 11th District

'court of Appeals(Eastland Texas) was 11-05-00165' CR. My court

appointed appeal lawyer filed a PDR in your court on or about the middle of April 2006. I have placed a self addressed stamped enve

lope in this letter for postage so that you can send me the info

requested please. I simply need to know the PD number in your

court,and the date your court refused it.

THAN&YOO,

JCTFULLY REQUESTED,

?/£•/? /J- /jsiM*—-

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 24 2015

Abe!Aeosta,Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1391 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1391

  Congratulating the American Motorcyclist Association on their 100th 
                              Anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2024

 Mr. Walberg (for himself, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Norcross, Mr. Van Orden, 
 Mr. Mann, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mrs. Miller of West Virginia, 
    and Mr. Davidson) submitted the following resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating the American Motorcyclist Association on their 100th 
                              Anniversary.

Whereas the American Motorcyclist Association has been promoting and protecting 
        the motorcycling lifestyle since 1924;
Whereas the American Motorcyclist Association's members compose the world's 
        largest and most dedicated group of motorcycle enthusiasts;
Whereas the American Motorcyclist Association represents motorcycle riders, 
        among the Nation's most passionate enthusiasts;
Whereas through member clubs, promoters, and partners, the American Motorcyclist 
        Association sanctions almost 3,000 motorsports competition events 
        annually; and
Whereas the American Motorcyclist Association's headquarters in Pickerington, 
        Ohio, is home to the AMA Motorcycle Hall of Fame, which honors those who 
        have contributed to the history of motorcycling through political 
        activism, culture, and sport, and which preserves the heritage of 
        motorcycling for future generations: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the 
American Motorcyclist Association on its 100th Anniversary and commends 
it for having promoted and protected the rights and interests of 
motorcyclists and motorcycle enthusiasts since 1924.
                                 <all>
```
M. P. No. 77-1.

#### Com-Cable, Inc. *v.*Archie Smith *et al.*

*Philip R. De Sano,*for petitioner.

*Harold W. Demopulos,*for Newport Cable TV, Inc.

*Tobin, LeRoy & Silverstein, Max Wistow, Merrill W. Sherman,*for Plantations CATV Co., Inc.

*George C. Berk,*for Cable Television of Rhode Island, Inc.

*Charles J. McGovern,*for Vision Cable Company of Rhode Island, Inc.

Petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the writ shall issue forthwith.
§ 534.1 General. ( a ) *Applicability.* This part applies to court reporters and interpreters appointed under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 28 (10 U.S.C. 828), and witnesses both in Government employ and those not in Government employ when subpoenaed to appear before a court.
( b ) *Use of term “court”.* The term “court” as used in this part will be construed to include court-martial, court of inquiry, military commission, or retiring board. “Military commission” includes any United States tribunal, by whatever name described, convened in the exercise of military government, martial law, or the laws of war.
#### § 21.460 What is the extent of grants officers' and agreements officers' authority?

Grants officers and agreements officers may bind the Government only to the extent of the authority delegated to them in their written statements of appointment (*see* § 21.445).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6810

GREGORY ROLAND PRUESS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-97-300; CA-01-59-5) Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Roland Pruess, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Marie Hoefling, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gregory Roland Pruess seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order denying Pruess’ motion for relief filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pruess has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Pruess’ motion for remand, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Raymond N. Joeckel, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Exploration Company, (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 11, 2006



/s/ Raymond N. JoeckelName: Raymond N. Joeckel Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2








The
following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 and is not
filed as provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and
Exchange Commission.





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics Research
Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to
his knowledge:





(1) the
Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
      9, 2009
            /s/
      David KeleherSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
  Treasurer
§ 536.8 Responsibilities and operations of command claims services. ( a ) *Chiefs of command claims services.* Chiefs of command claims services shall: ( 1 ) Exercise claims settlement authority as specified in this part, including appellate authority where so delegated.
( 2 ) Supervise the investigation, processing, and settlement of claims against, and in favor of the United States under the statutes and regulations listed in § 536.2, and pursuant to other appropriate statutes, regulations, and authorizations.
( 3 ) Designate and grant claims settlement authority to ACOs. A grant of such authority will not be effective until coordinated with the Commander USARCS, and assigned an office code. However, the chief of a command claims service may redesignate a CPO that already has an assigned office code as an ACO without coordination with the Commander USARCS. The Commander USARCS will be informed of such a designation.
( 4 ) Designate and grant claims approval authority to CPOs. Only CPOs staffed with a claims judge advocate (CJA) or claims attorney may be granted approval authority. A grant of such authority will not be effective until coordinated with the Commander USARCS, and assigned an office code.
( 5 ) Train claims personnel and monitor their operations and ongoing claims administration. Conduct a training course annually.
( 6 ) Implement pertinent claims policies.
( 7 ) Prepare and publish command claims directives.
( 8 ) Administer the command claims expenditure allowance, providing necessary data, estimates, and reports to USARCS on a regular basis.
( 9 ) Perform the responsibilities of an ACO (see § 536.9), as applicable, ensure that SOFA claims are investigated properly and timely filed with the receiving State and adequately funded.
( 10 ) Serve as the United States “sending State office,” if so designated, when operating in an area covered by a SOFA.
( 11 ) Supervise and provide technical assistance to subordinate ACOs within the command claims service's geographic area of responsibility.
( 12 ) Appoint FCCs.
( b ) *Operations of command claims services.* The SJA of the command shall supervise the command claims service. The command SJA may designate a field grade JA as the chief of the service. An adequate number of qualified claims personnel shall be assigned to ensure that claims are promptly investigated and acted upon. With the concurrence of the Commander USARCS, a command claims service may designate ACOs within its area of operations to carry out claims responsibilities within specified geographic areas subject to agreement by the commander concerned.
### SUBCHAPTER III—PROLIFERATION MATTERS
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dex One Corporation as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ Alfred T. Mockett
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyAlfred T. Mockett
    
    Steven M. BlondyChief Executive Officer and President
    
    Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerMay 2, 2011
    
    May 2, 2011
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1270 

Supporting the designation of June, as ‘‘Brain and Spine Metastasis 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2024 

Mrs. FOUSHEE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of June, as ‘‘Brain and Spine 

Metastasis Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas brain and spine metastasis can occur with almost 

any type of cancer; 

Whereas improved cancer treatments are leading to longer 

patient survival, but brain and spine metastasis rates are 

increasing; 

Whereas specific cancers commonly spread to the brain and 

spine, such as melanoma, lung, breast, colon, and prostate cancers; 

Whereas brain metastases are the leading cause of morbidity 

and mortality in patients with cancer; 

Whereas brain metastases are 5 times more common than 

primary brain tumors; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1270 IH 

Whereas advanced treatment options are available to improve 

patient outcomes; 

Whereas disparities in cancer care exist, and awareness is 

crucial to address these disparities; 

Whereas different treatments are needed for brain and spine 

metastasis than for other cancers; 

Whereas there are publicly available resources where patients 

and families can find information on brain and spine metastasis; and 

Whereas new and novel therapies are offering hope, but more 

support and funding for clinical trials and specialized 

centers is necessary: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses support for the designation of 

3 ‘‘Brain and Spine Metastasis Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) recognizes and affirms the commitment to 

5 increasing awareness of treatment options for people 

6 with cancer that has spread to the brain or spine; 

7 (3) recognizes and affirms the dedication to in8 creasing education for brain and spine metastasis so 

9 individuals can better understand their cancer or the 

10 cancer of a loved one; and 

11 (4) calls on the Department of Health and 

12 Human Services to— 

13 (A) increase education and awareness 

14 about treatment options available for patients 

15 with brain and spine metastases, including adVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:18 Jun 04, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1270.IH HR1270

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1270 IH 

1 vances and improvements in medical therapies 

2 such as targeted therapies or immunotherapies; 

3 (B) support resources to establish and sup4 port centers for brain and spine metastasis; 

5 (C) provide resources to increase access to 

6 dedicated clinical trials for patients with brain 

7 or spine metastases; and 

8 (D) invest in research specifically into the 

9 biology and treatment of brain and spine metas10 tasis, particularly across cancers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the period March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         19,569,417
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,492,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (310,000)
<INVENTORY>                                       409,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,471,707
<PP&E>                                         27,809,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,061,237)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 38,682,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,639,153
<BONDS>                                         1,735,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          144,043
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,594,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   38,682,658
<SALES>                                         4,037,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               20,827,412
<CGS>                                           6,574,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,714,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               17,791,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                304,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,350,364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,350,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,350,364)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.84)



</TABLE>
#### § 37.1245 Cash contributions.

A recipient's cash expenditures made as contributions toward cost sharing, including expenditures of money that third parties contributed to the recipient.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Daniel Wayne Tovar v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number s : 01

- 1 5

- 0036 9

- CR and 01

- 15

- 00370

- CR

Trial court case number s : CR23

, 522 and CR24,217

Trial court: 20th District Court of Milam County

Our review of the above

- referenced appeal requires a supplemental clerk’s record containing the pre

- trial sentencing investigation (PSI) report referenced at the March 13, 2015 sentencing hearing in the und erlying case s

. Accordingly, we order that the district court clerk file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the PSI report by no later than January 6 , 201 6

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ J a ne Bland

Acting individually

Date: December 3, 2015
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Union Agreements in the Leather-Tanning Industry, 1943

              																	Lehrer, Eleanor R.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Union Agreements in the Leather-Tanning Industry, 1943 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 777*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4256,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### §251. Transfer of functions

In accordance with subchapter XII (relating to transition provisions), there shall be transferred from the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization to the Secretary all functions performed under the following programs, and all personnel, assets, and liabilities pertaining to such programs, immediately before such transfer occurs:

(1) The Border Patrol program.

(2) The detention and removal program.

(3) The intelligence program.

(4) The investigations program.

(5) The inspections program.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §441, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2192; Pub. L. 114–125, title VIII, §802(g)(1)(B)(v)(I), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 212.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–125 substituted "Transfer of functions" for "Transfer of functions to Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security" in section catchline and "Secretary" for "Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security" in introductory provisions.
### Part A—Coordination With Non-Federal Entities
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Doughboy Industries, Inc. and Pantasote Company.

Motion for stay denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.