alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 274.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this memorandum is to prescribe regulations under which the Secretary of Defense or his designee may, from time to time, by public notice, offer financial institutions the opportunity to bid on the interest rates for the subject agreements. The bids made will be subject to the terms, conditions, and procedures herein set forth, except as they may be supplemented in the public notice or notices issued by the Secretary of Defense or his designee in connection with particular offerings.
### SUBCHAPTER I—TRANSITIONAL PAYMENTS TO TOBACCO QUOTA HOLDERS AND PRODUCERS OF TOBACCO
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

Melissa Mays v Governor Rick Snyder 

Docket No. 335555, 335725, 335726 

LC No. 16-000017-MM 

Kathleen Jansen 

Presiding Judge 

Karen M. Fort Hood 

Michael J. Riordan 

Judges 

The Court orders that the January 25, 2018 opinion is hereby AMENDED. The opinion 

contained the following clerical error: On Page 8, Paragraph 2, the op in ion incorrectly refers to June 21, 

2015, when in fact, the opinion should read July 21, 2015. 

In all other respects, the January 25, 2018 opinion remains unchanged. 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

JAN 2 6 2018 

Date
###### Editorial Note on Part 800

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 54972, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 800 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 800.10 Information collection.

The collection of information contained in §§ 800.11, 800.21(c), 800.23(b)(2), 800.23(b)(3), 800.40(a), and 800.60(a) have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned clearance number 1029-0043. The information will be used to determine if reclamation bonds are sufficient to comply with the Act. Response is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the requirements of 30 U.S.C. 1201 *et seq.* Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 28 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspects of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Information Collection Clearance Officer, 1951 Constitution Avenue NW., rm 5415 L, Washington, DC 20240 and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (1029-0043), Washington, DC 20503.

[56 FR 59994, Nov. 26, 1991, as amended at 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54972, Nov. 17, 2017]
### **CHAPTER 46—SURPLUS DISPOSAL OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES**

Sec.
1851 to 1853. Repealed.
1854.
Agreements limiting imports.
1855.
Supplemental appropriations to encourage exportation and domestic consumption of agricultural products.
1856.
Transfer of bartered materials to supplemental stockpile; limitation of acquisition to certain programs; authorization of appropriations.
1857, 1858. Repealed.
1859.
Donation to penal and correctional institutions.
1860.
Federal irrigation, drainage, and flood-control projects.
Summary of Director Compensation Arrangements



 EXHIBIT 10.28 
 Summary of Director Compensation Arrangements 
 We currently pay each director who is not employed by
us or any of our affiliates (i.e., all of our directors except for our Chairman, Frank F. Khulusi) a quarterly retainer of $6,000, $2,500 for each regular board meeting attended in person or telephonically, $1,000 for each special board meeting
attended in person or telephonically, $1,000 for each committee meeting attended in person, and $500 for each committee meeting attended telephonically. We also pay the chairperson of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors an additional
annual retainer of $12,500 (paid quarterly) for serving in such capacity. Directors who are employed by us or any of our affiliates are not paid any additional compensation for their service on our Board of Directors. We reimburse each of our
directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that they incur in connection with attending board or committee meetings. We have entered into indemnification agreements, a form of which is attached as an exhibit to the accompanying Annual Report on
Form 10-K, with each of our directors. 
 Our directors are also eligible to participate in our 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, which
is administered by our Compensation Committee under authority delegated by our Board of Directors. The terms and conditions of option grants to our non-employee directors under our 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, are determined in the
discretion of our Compensation Committee, and must be consistent with the terms of the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, which is filed as an exhibit to the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K. 
 The compensation arrangements we have with our directors are reviewed and may be modified from time to time by our Board of Directors.
#### § 507.8 Authority to sell.

No certificate of authority to manufacture is required for selling controlled heraldic items listed in § 507.13. However, all sellers must ensure that all articles they sell bear hallmarks assigned by TIOH and are manufactured by certified manufacturers in conformance with applicable Government specifications.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Family Allowances in Various Countries

              																	Waggaman, Mary T. (Mary Theresa). 						*Family Allowances in Various Countries : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 754*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1943,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4239,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy
Carolinas) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy Carolinas,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Carolinas.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    JAMES E.
ROGERS 
|James E. Rogers        
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 12, 2009
Exhibit 23.0
    

           Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-9420,  33-17594 and 33-64421) of Ben & Jerry's Homemade,  Inc.
of our report dated January 23, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Ben & Jerry's Homemade,  Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 27, 1997.



                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                        32,422
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 32,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                  373
<INVENTORY>                                   7,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              76,189
<PP&E>                                        60,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                47,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                106,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         36,076
<BONDS>                                       40,339
<COMMON>                                      8,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   66
<OTHER-SE>                                    15,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  106,554
<SALES>                                       46,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              46,950
<CGS>                                         35,179
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 43,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              30
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              24
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3,264
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           2,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .37
        

</TABLE>
### Physical properties of the surface materials at the Viking landing sites on Mars

By: H. J. MooreR.E. HuttonG.D. ClowC.R. Spitzer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1389

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (2129 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (2342 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §1040. Farmers' Home Administration funds account

When authorized by appropriation or other law, funds of the Farmers' Home Administration available for administrative expenses may be placed in a single account.

(Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 950, §9(b), 70 Stat. 1034.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1956, and not as part of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act which constitutes a major part of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         57,050
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3940843
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (73250)
<INVENTORY>                                    4814589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9460996
<PP&E>                                         3870392
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1775356)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11945166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10149976
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       202390
<OTHER-SE>                                     902612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11945166
<SALES>                                        6658155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6658155
<CGS>                                          5792111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5792111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               933566
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             200058
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (267580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (267580)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (267580)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.16)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         815,912
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,955,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,775,319
<PP&E>                                      33,717,733
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,390,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,210,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,062,513
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,673
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,285,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,210,327
<SALES>                                      9,091,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,277,974
<CGS>                                        1,458,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,476,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,785,927
<INCOME-TAX>                                   925,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,860,927
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,860,927
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38


</TABLE>
### §1186. Memorandum of Understanding annex

Not later than 1 year after August 3, 2007, the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary shall execute and develop an annex to the Memorandum of Understanding between the two departments signed on September 28, 2004, governing the specific roles, delineations of responsibilities, resources, and commitments of the Department of Transportation and the Department of Homeland Security, respectively, in addressing motor carrier transportation security matters, including over-the-road bus security matters, and shall cover the processes the Departments will follow to promote communications, efficiency, and nonduplication of effort.

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1541, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 469.)
#### George Goldberg, Appellant, v New York Times, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 9, 1978, dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the complaint reinstated, with $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellant. The ground for dismissal assigned at Special Term is that "it is impossible for the plaintiff to prove the essential element of damages” resulting from defendant-respondent’s failure to print the advertisement accepted from plaintiff-appellant. The activities of defendant in receiving the advertisement, in assuring timely insertion in the newspaper, in attempting to secure a reorder, and in the very belated act of explanation for failure to print the advertisement all add up to a contract that was deliberately breached. If breach is proven, a remedy is available even though provable damage may actually be no more than nominal. "A person violating his contract should not be permitted entirely to escape liability because the amount of the damages which he has caused is uncertain.” *(Wakeman v Wheeler & Wilson Mfg. Co.,*101 NY 205, 209.) Nor should the second cause, seeking exemplary damage, have been dismissed. The allegation is that defendant deliberately failed to run the advertisement because its credit records reflected adversely on plaintiff. That information was erroneous, and defendant failed to advise plaintiff of its reason in time to be corrected and to have the advertisement run. The relief sought, though erroneously stated as a separate cause, should be deemed part of the prayer for damages. *(Gill v Montgomery Ward & Co.,*14 AD2d 987.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Silverman, Fein and Markewich, JJ.
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James C. Cook, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

          (2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ JAMES C. COOK                                                      |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                        |   |
| **James C. Cook Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** |   |

May 14, 2003

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Constar International Inc. and will be retained by Constar International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 263.6 Speeding or reckless driving. ( a ) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on the site at a speed greater than or in a manner other that what is reasonable and prudent for the particular location, given the conditions of traffic, weather, and road surface and having regard to the actual and potential hazards existing.
( b ) Except when a special hazard exists that requires lower speed, the speed limit on the site is 15 m.p.h., unless another speed limit has been duly posted, and no person shall drive a motor vehicle on the site in excess of the speed limit.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 10, 2014

NO. 03-13-00128-CR

Robert LeBlanc, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction signed by the district court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s

judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication 

of costs is made.
----

| Name                                        |   | Jurisdiction                    Of Incorporation  |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Hurco                  B.V.                 |   | the                  Netherlands                       |
| Hurco                  Europe Limited       |   | United                  Kingdom                        |
| Hurco                  GmbH                 |   | Federal                  Republic of Germany           |
| Hurco                  Manufacturing Ltd.   |   | Taiwan                  R.O.C.                         |
| Hurco                  S.a.r.l.             |   | France                                                 |
| Hurco                  S.r.l.               |   | Italy                                                  |
| Hurco                  (S.E. Asia) Pte Ltd. |   | Singapore                                              |

----
§ 37.540 May I accept fully depreciated real property or equipment as cost sharing? You should limit the value of any contribution of a fully depreciated asset to a reasonable use charge. In determining what is reasonable, you must consider: ( a ) The original cost of the asset;
( b ) Its estimated remaining useful life at the time of your negotiations;
( c ) The effect of any increased maintenance charges or decreased performance due to age; and
( d ) The amount of depreciation that the participant previously charged to Federal awards.