alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
20°07'30"

20°00°

19°52'30"

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

155°37'30"

EES

20°07'30"

a aaa
Why CISTERN ty “

SM 2una Loa and-Hualalai_~
a

155°37'30" INTERIOR—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, RESTON, VA—1997

‘SCALE 1:100 000 (ee Geology mapped by W.S. Wise in 1981-87;

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, fee

Hawaii County, Hawaii, Sheet 1 of 3, 1980 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 MILES OS geology based in part on work of M.A. Kuntz
Universal Transverse Mercator projection | /£ See a) 2> (unpub. mapping, 1987) in vicinity of
5| |= 1 0 1 2 2 yi eae HAWAIAN Puu Ulaula to Puu lo
3|/E eee ; ISLANDS
a CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 METERS net

‘APPROXIMATE MEAN NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929

DECLINATION, 1997

GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE LOWER NORTHWEST FLANK OF MAUNA KEA VOLCANO, HAWAII
By
William S. Wise
1997

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1557
PLATE 1

CORRELATION OF LAVAS OF THE HAMAKUA VOLCANICS

[Boxes represent actual lava flows. Boxes (both touching and nontouching) in any vertical sequence, as well as laterally touching boxes, represent
true stratigraphic relation of flows; however, equivalent horizontal position of nontouching boxes does not imply age correlation. Box size does not
represent true thickness or lateral extent of flow; horizontally lengthened box shows multiple stratigraphic relations, Contacts between boxes are
dashed where stratigraphic relations are inferred. Box numbers (in italic) refer to numbered flows on map. Flow 35 is shown twice to portray its
stratigraphic relation to both flow 36 and flow 47. Sample numbers refer to localities plotted on plate 4; chemical analyses are given in table 1.
Newly reported radiometric ages (in ka) shown in parentheses; analytical data given in table 4]

JO5; JO-13; J0-25
10-14; 1018 o>
JQ-2+

10-21; SS 4a 47 J02-GaT

65. 85 JO-

JOQ-22 (187440)

G S

78 5 PS (T175O)

JO-5; JO-7 (81436)

EXPLANATION

{Darker colors, cinder cones; lighter colors, lava flows; internal contacts distinguish individual flow
units. Flow numbers (in italic) refer to diagram entitled "Correlation of Lavas of the Hamakua
Volcanics"; unnumbered flows and cones lack field evidence for relative age and, therefore, are
omitted from correlation diagram. See table 2 for description of basalts of the Hamakua Volcanics]

Alluvium

Eolian deposits

Littoral deposits

Hawaiitic lava flows and cinder cones of the Laupahoehoe Volcanics, undivided

Lava flows and cinder cones of the Hamakua Volcanics
Basalt

Olivine basalt
Plagioclase basalt
Porphyritic basalt
Ankaramite

High-titanium basalt

BEAREE BH

Lava flows and cinder cones of neighboring volcanoes, undivided

Contact
Fissure vent of the Laupahoehoe Volcanics

Wolfe, Edward W., Wise, William S., and Dalrymple,
G. Brent, 1997, The geology and petrology of Mauna
Kea Volcano—a study of postshield volcanism:

U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1557.
exv10w6



 







Exhibit 10.6




Term Sheet for Luis Padilla



Luis Padilla accepted the role of Chief Executive Officer for the Kuhlman Company on December
22, 2005. At that time, Mr. Padilla accepted the following terms in consideration of his new
position:




Board Review of the General Terms




Of The Employment Agreement with Luis Padilla




Proposed Framework




	 	 	 
	Company:

	 	Kuhlman Company, Inc.
	 
	 	 
	Executive:

	 	Luis Padilla
	 
	 	 
	Position:

	 	Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 
	Employment Contract:

	 	The Company will agree to enter into an Employment Contract whereby
the Employee shall provide Services to the Company.
	 
	 	 
	Term:

	 	The Term of the Employment Contract will be for three years.
	 
	 	 
	Compensation:

	 	The Company will provide the Executive with the following elements of
compensation:







	 	•	 	500,000 Shares of Restricted Stock issued by the Company with
the following vesting requirements:






	 	 	 ̄	100,000 vesting 3/01/06 immediately
	 
	 	 	 ̄	200,000 vesting on 12/31/06 provided Board approved financial
performance targets are met.
	 
	 	 	 ̄	200,000 vesting on 12/30/07 provided Board
approved financial performance targets are met.






	 	•	 	Initially, the Executive will receive no salary no salary nor
is he eligible for an annual bonus. However, when the Compensation
Committee reviews compensation for the Executive Officers, the
Committee will include a compensation review for the Executive. To
decide whether to add a salary and bonus, the Committee will consider
among other factors, the compensation plans in place for the other
Executive Officers, the business and financial situation at the
Company, the market for comparable executive talent, and the
Executive’s role.
	 
	 	•	 	The Executive will commute from his home in Illinois. The
Company will reimburse reasonable travel and lodging expenses.




 









 











	 	 	 	 	 
	Purchase of Stock

	 	•	The Executive will purchase a total of 500,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock from the following founders at the following
prices:
	 
	 

	 			 ̄
 500,000 @ $1.00 per share, from Scott Kuhlman.
	 
	 

	 		Sale of the Stock would be restricted for one year. After the
restriction, the Executive may sell a maximum of 200,000 shares per
quarter.
	 
	 

	 		The Executive and Mr. Kuhlman will agree to the purchase terms and
conditions.
	 
	Employment Status:

	 	•	In addition to this role at Kuhlman Company, the Executive
will continue his consulting practice. Outside consulting may
continue until the CEO role requires full-time attention. Currently,
the CEO role will require at least 50% of full-time employment.
	 
	Responsibilities,
Conditions of Employment,
and Termination:

	 	•	Upon Board approval of the general terms of the employment
agreement, the Compensation Committee will establish position
responsibilities, conditions of employment, and termination
provisions.
	 
	Other:

	 	•	Scott Kuhlman to retain titles of Chairman of the Board,
President, and Chief Creative Officer.
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Diane M. LaPointe, certify that:   1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of
Security Capital Corporation (the 
registrant); 2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this 
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this  report; 4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of these disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)Reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and  5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)All significant deficiencies and weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 31, 2004/s/ Diane M. LaPointeDiane M. LaPointeChief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k
David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,
J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

March 21, 2018

p0314 

# Order

Clerk 

### March 21, 2018

156370

SAAD AKRAM BAHODA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 15 6370 COA: 332313 Macomb CC: 2015-001714-CZ STEVEN M. KAPLAN, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIE D, because we are not persuaded that the questions pre sented should be reviewed by th is Court.
### §301b. Current and proposed agreements

Nothing in this part or in section 4 of the Cross-Border Trade Enhancement Act of 2016 may be construed as affecting—

(1) any agreement entered into pursuant to section 560 of division D of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113–6) or section 559 of title V of division F of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (6 U.S.C. 211 note; Public Law 113–76), as in existence on the day before December 16, 2016, and any such agreement shall continue to have full force and effect on and after such date; or

(2) a proposal accepted for consideration by U.S. Customs and Border Protection pursuant to such section 559, as in existence on the day before December 16, 2016.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §483, as added Pub. L. 114–279, §2(a), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1421.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4 of the Cross-Border Trade Enhancement Act of 2016, referred to in text, is section 4 of Pub. L. 114–279, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1422, which repealed section 560 of division D of Pub. L. 113–6 and section 559 of title V of division F of Pub. L. 113–76. Section 560 of Pub. L. 113–6, was not classified to the Code. Section 559 of Pub. L. 113–76 was classified as a note under section 211 of this title.
From: Garth Tayler [ mailto:gtayler@brick.com ]

Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:50 PM

To: Telander, Jeff

Cc: Tsirigotis, Peter; Barnett, Keith; Fruh, Steve; Schimmel, Terry (Bricks

- Phenix City); ( SMiller@bia.org )

Subject: Potential Mercury Emissions from Clay Brick Kilns

Dear Mr. Telander

I attach a memo from Terry Schimmel and Susan Miller, key members of the BIA MACT Task Force.

The Memo highlights some vi tal and important factors relating to Mercury Emissions from Clay Brick

Kilns.

Please would you give this your undivided attention.

Thank you



## Dr. Garth Tayler

BIA MACT Task Force Chairman

Technical Director

Acme Brick Company

Fort Worth, Texas
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the Three months ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dennis J. Allingham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By        /s/ DENNIS J. ALLINGHAM
  -------------------------------------------
Dennis J. Allingham
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
November 12, 2002
EXHIBIT 11



NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Statement re computation of per share earnings

(Amounts in Thousands  Except Per Share Data)



|                                           |  |                               |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                           |  | For the YearEnded December 31
|                                           |  | 2004                          |        | 2003 |   | 2002  
|Net income                                 |  | $                             | 18,960 |      | $ | 14,617 |  | $ | 12,118
|                                           |  |                               |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Weighted average common shares outstanding |  |                               | 15,005 |      |   | 15,005 |  |   | 15,005
|                                           |  |                               |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Basic and diluted earnings per share       |  | $                             | 1.26   |      | $ | .97    |  | $ | .81   
|                                           |  |                               |        |      |   |        |  |   |
§ 229.17 Other penalties and rewards. ( a ) Section 6 of the Act contains criminal prohibitions and provisions for criminal penalties. Section 8(b) of the Act provides that archaeological resources, vehicles, or equipment involved in a violation may be subject to forfeiture.
( b ) Section 8(a) of the Act provides for rewards to be made to persons who furnish information which leads to conviction for a criminal violation or to assessment of a civil penalty. The Federal land manager may certify to the Secretary of the Treasury that a person is eligible to receive payment. Officers and employees of Federal, State, or local government who furnish information or render service in the performance of their official duties, and persons who have provided information under § 229.16(b)(1)(iii) shall not be certified eligible to receive payment of rewards.
( c ) In cases involving Indian lands, all civil penalty monies and any item forfeited under the provisions of this section shall be transferred to the appropriate Indian or Indian tribe.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff v. Harry Bareika, Harry Bareika, Inc., Walter Motor Truck Company and Rand-MacMurray, Inc., Defendants.

Motion by defendants Walter Corporation and RandMacMurray Corporation to require the Attorney-General to make further statements and disclosures in respect of the minutes of the Grand Jury. Moving defendants have been allowed an inspection of the minutes of the Grand Jury which indicted them (9 A D 2d 1002). The affidavit by the Special Assistant Attorney-General states that defendants have now been furnished with all the testimony and all the exhibits before the Grand Jury relating to the indictment. This statement sufficiently satisfies some parts of the additional information sought by the moving parties. The certificate of the official stenographer as to completeness of the testimony further supplements this affidavit. All the *568information that was disclosed to the Grand Jury on standardization of the subject matter of bids seems now to have been furnished defendants in conformity with our order. What legal advice the Attorney-General gave the Grand Jury, or the question of his duty to give any, is not germane to this motion. If on all the proof now furnished the Grand Jury did not have a legally sufficient record to indict, defendants have an appropriate remedy. We think there now has been a. satisfactory compliance with our order directing inspection. The further testimony taken before the Grand Jury on a date after the indictment is immaterial to this motion. Motion denied. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 5, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

128730 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver & (14) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128730 COA: 261522 Wayne CC: 03-011706-01 TERRENCE WESLEY JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the May 10, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to add issue is DENIED.

K ELLY , J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan , lv gtd 472 Mich 881 (2005).

l1128 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5, 2005

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          768408
<NAME>                                         Cyanotech Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2775
<SECURITIES>                                   3954
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2791
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                    1138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              11186
<PP&E>                                        18395
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                26015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2121
<BONDS>                                         559
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       1
<COMMON>                                         63
<OTHER-SE>                                    23271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  26015
<SALES>                                       11399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              11399
<CGS>                                          4590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4159
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4159
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .25
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Jack C. BridgesJack C. BridgesExecutive Vice-PresidentAugust 12, 2005Date
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1521 

Expressing support for the designation of September 30, 2024, as ‘‘Rare 

Cancer Day’’ to highlight the challenges patients with rare cancers face 

and to raise awareness and support efforts to improve early diagnosis 

and treatment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2024 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. KILMER, Ms. 

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, and Mrs. DINGELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of September 30, 

2024, as ‘‘Rare Cancer Day’’ to highlight the challenges 

patients with rare cancers face and to raise awareness 

and support efforts to improve early diagnosis and treatment. 

Whereas, approximately 1 in 5 people living with cancer in 

the United States is diagnosed with a rare cancer; 

Whereas all pediatric cancers are rare; 

Whereas a quarter of all cancer deaths each year are due to 

rare cancers; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1521 IH 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate is lower for patients with a 

rare cancer than for those diagnosed with a more common cancer; 

Whereas the early detection and treatment of rare cancers is 

challenging for patients, providers, and scientists; 

Whereas early detection of rare cancers currently is challenging for patients because they are not aware of rare 

cancer symptoms; 

Whereas the length of time that it takes for providers to diagnose a rare cancer is longer than for more common 

cancers because symptoms may be unusual and less recognizable; 

Whereas efforts to increase awareness of rare cancer symptoms among patients and clinicians would lead to earlier 

detection and improvements in survival rates; 

Whereas scientific understanding of and the development of 

effective treatments for many rare cancers are less established than with more common cancers; and 

Whereas treatment options for many rare cancers currently 

are more limited than with more common cancers: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports designating a ‘‘Rare Cancer Day’’; 

3 (2) recognizes the challenges of detecting rare 

4 cancer; 

5 (3) understands that rare cancer is prevalent 

6 among cancer patients; 

7 (4) acknowledges the devastating impact that 

8 rare cancer has on individuals; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1521 IH 

1 (5) recognizes the low survival rate of individ2 uals with rare cancer compared to more common 

3 cancers; 

4 (6) supports increasing awareness of rare can5 cer symptoms to increase early detection and im6 prove survival rates; 

7 (7) encourages partnerships with the medical 

8 and scientific fields to improve the early diagnosis of 

9 rare cancers and to develop effective treatments to 

10 eradicate them; and 

11 (8) supports the dedication of funding to ex12 plore cures and treatments for rare cancers. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS