alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Winthrop Partners 80 Limited
Partnership (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.

Date: March 29, 2004                                /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                    ---------------------
                                                    Michael L. Ashner
                                                    Chief Executive Officer




Date: March 29, 2004                                /s/ Thomas Staples
                                                    ------------------
                                                    Thomas Staples
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21



                NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                          Subsidiaries of Registrant



      North Pittsburgh Telephone Company, Penn Telecom, Inc. and Pinnatech, Inc.
are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant.  The wholly-owned subsidiaries
of the Registrant are incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.  In
addition, Penn Telecom, Inc. owns 49.5% of Boulevard Communications, L.L.P.
(Boulevard).  The Registrant owns 50% of the voting capital stock of Multi, Inc.
which in turn owns 0.5% of Boulevard.  Neither Boulevard nor Multi, Inc. is
considered a significant subsidiary.  Penn Telecom, Inc.'s ownership of
Boulevard and the Registrant's ownership of Multi, Inc. are accounted for using
the equity method.
Our Very 

Own Star: 

the Sun

Walk outside on a clear day and say,

"Hello!" to our very own star - the Sun!

(But don’t ever look directly at the Sun.

You may damage your eyes.)

g

dot would be the size of the Earth. Of

course, the Earth is not this close to

the Sun.
26 years
yy

you be when you got to the Sun? How old

would you be when you got back?

What do we get from the Sun? The

Sun gives us heat and light necessary for

us to live. Without the Sun, the Earth

would be a frozen ball of ice.

gases. If you look closely at the candle,

you can see brighter and darker spots in

the flame. The hot gases of the Sun also

show darker and lighter spots, and the

gases move and flow.

g 

There are also huge explosions called

solar flares in which the hot gases are

spit away from the Sun - like spaghetti

sauce that bubbles and spatters. These

great storms blast material out of the

Sun and into space.

solar wind. It takes one to five days for

this wind to reach Earth. Sometimes the

solar wind causes beautiful lights in the

night sky, called auroras. These lights

look like moving sheets of colors high in

the sky.

rupt electricity, telephones, televisions,

and radios. This can be very dangerous

for police, firefighters, airplanes, and

ships at sea. 

y 

the Earth’s weather and climate. NASA

helps us to learn more about the Sun by

sending satellites into space to study the

space weather. Perhaps one day you can

work for NASA, too!

the daytime sky and gives us warmth just

as the nighttime stars give the sky a

special beauty.
Design & Illustrations by Daniel Vong

Families, enjoy the on-line interactive

version of “Our Very Own Star: the

Sun” on the Solar Terrestrial Probes

Education and Outreach homepage!

http://stp.gsfc.nasa.gov
### §1443. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title I, §102, as added Aug. 28, 1958, Pub. L. 85–835, title I, §101, 72 Stat. 988, related to acreage allotment and price support levels for the 1959 and 1960 crops of upland cotton.
#### § 2700.32 Declassification general.

Declassification of classified information shall be given emphasis comparable to that accorded to classification. The determination to declassify information shall not be made on the basis of the level of classification assigned, but on the loss of the sensitivity of the information with the passage of time, and with due regard for the public interest in access to official information. At the time of review, any determination not to declassify shall be based on a determination that despite the passage of time since classification, release of information reasonably could still be expected to cause at least identifiable damage to the national security.
#### WERNER, Respondent, v. HEARST, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by Melle S. T. Werner against William R. Hearst.

No opinion. Order settled by certifying that a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals, under subdivision 2 of section 191 of the Code of Civil Procedure, without specifying any particular question. See Commercial Bank v. Sherwood, 162 N. Y. 310, 56 N. E. 834.
### §1337. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–703, title III, §317, Sept. 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 622

Section, act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §337, 52 Stat. 55, related to adjustment and suspension of quotas.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective only with respect to programs applicable to crops planted for harvest in calendar year 1964 or any subsequent year and marketing years beginning in calendar year 1964, or any subsequent year, see section 323 of Pub. L. 87–703, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
§ 507.14 Articles not authorized for manufacture or commercial sale. The following articles are not authorized for manufacture and commercial sale, except under contract with the Defense Logistics Agency, Troop Support (DLA Troop Support): ( a ) The Medal of Honor.
( b ) Service ribbon for the Medal of Honor.
( c ) Medal of Honor Rosette.
( d ) Medal of Honor Flag.
( e ) Military Department Service flags (prescribed in Army Regulation 840-10).
( f ) Articles for commercial sale that incorporate designs or likenesses of insignia listed in § 507.13, except when authorized in writing by the Army Trademark Licensing Program as specified in § 507.10(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6769

DONALD LLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

D. SMITH-HARRIS, Corporal; ANGELA PICKNEY

RUIZ, Hearing Officer; JOHN I. NICHOLS,

Inmates' Representative; EDSELL T. TAYLOR,

Warden of MacDougall Correctional Institution

and the Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-3255-6-1AK)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Dargan McMaster, TOMKINS &

MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. SmithHarris, No. CA-95-3255-6-1AK (D.S.C. Apr. 18, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1609.3 Eligibility. ( a ) The President, upon the recommendation of the respective Governors, will consider for appointment as a member of a local board, any person who: ( 1 ) Is within the age limits prescribed by the Military Selective Service Act; and
( 2 ) Is a citizen of the United States; and
( 3 ) Is a resident of the county in which the local board has jurisdiction; and
( 4 ) Is not an active or retired member of the Armed Forces or any reserve component thereof; and
( 5 ) Has not served as a member of a Selective Service board for a period of more than 20 years; and
( 6 ) Is able to perform such duties as necessary during standby status; and
( 7 ) Is able to devote sufficient time to board affairs; and
( 8 ) Is willing to fairly and uniformly apply Selective Service Law.
( b ) The President, upon the recommendation of the Director of Selective Service, will consider for appointment as a member of a district appeal board any person who: ( 1 ) Is within the age limits prescribed by the Military Selective Service Act; and
( 2 ) Is a citizen of the United States; and
( 3 ) Is a resident of the Federal Judicial District in which the district appeal board has jurisdiction; and
( 4 ) Is not an active or retired member of the Armed Forces or any reserve component thereof; and
( 5 ) Has not served as a member of a Selective Service board for a period of more than 20 years; and
( 6 ) Is able to perform such duties as necessary during standby status; and
( 7 ) Is able to devote sufficient time to the district appeal board affairs; and
( 8 ) Is willing to fairly and uniformly apply Selective Service Law.
### §456. Military activities

Nothing in this chapter shall confer upon the Secretary any authority to engage in warfighting, the military defense of the United States, or other military activities, nor shall anything in this chapter limit the existing authority of the Department of Defense or the Armed Forces to engage in warfighting, the military defense of the United States, or other military activities.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §876, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2244.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, known as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER


THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND SECTION 1350 OF


CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Each of the undersigned, H. Craig Dees and Peter R. Culpepper, certifies pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that (1) this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, of Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and (2) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This Certification is signed on March 16, 2011




/s/ H. Craig DeesH. Craig Dees, Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer/s/ Peter R. CulpepperChief Financial OfficerChief Operating Officer
§ 282.2 Applicability and scope. This part applies to: ( a ) The Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities in the Department of Defense (hereafter referred to collectively as “the DoD Components”).
( b ) The Coast Guard, when it is not operating as a Service in the Navy under agreement with the Department of Homeland Security, and the Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service (PHS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), under agreements with the Departments of Health and Human Services and Commerce (hereafter referred to collectively as “the non-DoD Components”).
### §136w–3. Identification of pests; cooperation with Department of Agriculture's program

#### (a) In general

The Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall identify those pests that must be brought under control. The Administrator shall also coordinate and cooperate with the Secretary of Agriculture's research and implementation programs to develop and improve the safe use and effectiveness of chemical, biological, and alternative methods to combat and control pests that reduce the quality and economical production and distribution of agricultural products to domestic and foreign consumers.

#### (b) Pest control availability

#### (1) In general

The Administrator, in cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall identify—

(A) available methods of pest control by crop or animal;

(B) minor pest control problems, both in minor crops and minor or localized problems in major crops; and

(C) factors limiting the availability of specific pest control methods, such as resistance to control methods and regulatory actions limiting the availability of control methods.

#### (2) Report

The Secretary of Agriculture shall, not later than 180 days after November 28, 1990, and annually thereafter, prepare a report and send the report to the Administrator. The report shall—

(A) contain the information described in paragraph (1);

(B) identify the crucial pest control needs where a shortage of control methods is indicated by the information described in paragraph (1); and

(C) describe in detail research and extension efforts designed to address the needs identified in subparagraph (B).

#### (c) Integrated pest management

The Administrator, in cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall develop approaches to the control of pests based on integrated pest management that respond to the needs of producers, with a special emphasis on minor pests.

#### (d) Public health pests

The Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall identify pests of significant public health importance and, in coordination with the Public Health Service, develop and implement programs to improve and facilitate the safe and necessary use of chemical, biological, and other methods to combat and control such pests of public health importance.

(June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §28, as added Pub. L. 95–396, §24(2), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 838; amended Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1495, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3629; Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §862(b)(1), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1174; Pub. L. 104–170, title II, §236, Aug. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1509.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (b)(2)(A). Pub. L. 104–127 struck out "and the information required by section 5882 of this title" after "paragraph (1)".

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–170 added subsec. (d).

1990—Pub. L. 101–624 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
### §1431f. Assistance to foreign countries to mitigate effects of HIV and AIDS

On and after November 10, 2005, of any shipments of commodities made pursuant to section 1431(b) of this title, the Secretary of Agriculture shall, to the extent practicable, direct that tonnage equal in value to not more than $25,000,000 shall be made available to foreign countries to assist in mitigating the effects of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome on communities, including the provision of—

(1) agricultural commodities to—

(A) individuals with Human Immunodeficiency Virus or Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome in the communities; and

(B) households in the communities, particularly individuals caring for orphaned children; and

(2) agricultural commodities monetized to provide other assistance (including assistance under microcredit and microenterprise programs) to create or restore sustainable livelihoods among individuals in the communities, particularly individuals caring for orphaned children.

(Pub. L. 109–97, title VII, §725, Nov. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 2153.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006, and not as part of the Agricultural Act of 1949 which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of the 1949 Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 108–447, div. A, title VII, §728, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2843.

Pub. L. 108–199, div. A, title VII, §725, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 34.

Pub. L. 108–7, div. A, title VII, §725, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 42.

Pub. L. 107—76, title VII, §727, Nov. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 735.

Pub. L. 106—387, §1(a) [title VII, §743], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–35.
#### CARROLL v. KOONTZ

No. 409P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 208

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
April 5, 2013

Docket Operations M-30 West Building Ground Floor W 12-140, 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE, Washington DC 20590;3

United States ofAmerica Department ofTransportation Office ofSecretary Washington DC

RE. Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 SLt

Itwould not be in the best interest ofthe 7 communities being served by Silver Airways in Montana to suspend service to Miles City and Lewistown Montana at this time.

Ifthis were to happen wefeel the whole system ofservice could be in jeopardy for the rest ofthe communities being served by Silver Airways.

We as the Airport Authorityfeel this service must be continued at least intothe next two year period to give these two communities ample time to make adjustments and form a new plan for increasing ridership. We understand that the lawwas changed and Lewistown and Mile City have not had ampletime to address the impeding loss oftheir air carrier. We are sure you can understand the impactto both communities ifthis service is terminated. Once it is gone it may never return. Montana is a large state and distances are very large in the scope of being able to move people to a destination hub. Certainlythere needs to be some latitude forthe two communities to worktoward a solution totheir existing lack of boarding's and cost ofthe subsidy per passenger.At ourtask force meeting in Billings on the 4th ofthis month some interesting information was presented to demonstrate when Denver was the hub their boarding's were far greaterthan having Billings as their hub. This should be investigated and a determination needs to be made based on the prior ridership from both communities. We are recommending that before you rush to judgmentthatyou look atall the facts that may impactthese and the other communities thatwill be impacted by eliminatingthem from the EAS service now being provided. The dynamics of Montana are changing and the purpose ofthe EAS program was and we hope will continue to be to provide this service tothe
seven communities in Montana thatthe system was designed for.

Thank you foryour prompt attention to this state wide problem and our hope is thatyou will not enforce this Order ofShow Cause atthis time and give the task force time to address this problem. Atthis time we are confident there is a solution that needs to be worked out bythe communities in Montana and not a Washington solution that is far removed from the real problems in Montana.

Thank you for consideration and addressing the problem pertinentto Montana.
Sincerely Sidney Richland Airport Authority Sidney, Montana
H. Res. 1431 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 10, 2024. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Garcı ́a of Illinois. 

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS: Mr. Horsford. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
### §6334. Donations of leave

(a) An employee may, by written application to the employing agency of such employee, request that a specified number of hours be transferred from the annual leave account of such employee to the annual leave account of a leave recipient in accordance with section 6332.

(b)(1) In any one leave year, a leave donor may donate no more than a total of one-half of the amount of annual leave such donor would be entitled to accrue during the leave year in which the donation is made.

(2) A leave donor who is projected to have annual leave that otherwise would be subject to forfeiture at the end of the leave year under section 6304(a) may donate no more than the number of hours remaining in the leave year (as of the date of the transfer) for which the leave donor is scheduled to work and receive pay.

(3) The employing agency of a leave donor may waive the limitation under paragraphs (1) and (2). Any such waiver shall be made in writing.

(c) The Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations to include procedures to carry out this subchapter when the leave donor and the leave recipient are employed by different agencies.

(Added Pub. L. 100–566, §2(a), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2835.)
#### James J. McGinty, as Guardian ad Litem of Susan McGinty, an Infant, et al., Appellants, v. Roxbury Ski Center, Incorporated, Respondent.

nt. In a negligence action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries arising from her use of a ski slide, and by her father for loss of services, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 11, 1959, dismissing the complaint by reason of their failure to submit to an examination before trial unless they submit to such examination within 90 days after service upon their attorney of a copy of the said order. Order modified on the law and the facts, so as to provide that the motion is granted unless the plaintiffs submit to an examination before trial within 60 days after the return of the infant plaintiff to the continental United States. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. After the commencement of this action, the infant plaintiff was married. Thereafter her husband was inducted into the Armed Forces, and was sent to Germany, accompanied by his wife, the infant plaintiff. The notice for examination before trial was served subsequent to their departure from the United States. The infant plaintiff’s husband’s tour of duty in Germany is expected to be terminated in June or July, 1962. Defendant will be protected by the *“*statement of readiness rule ” from being obliged to proceed to trial without having an opportunity to examine plaintiffs before trial. No facts are disclosed showing prejudice to defendant by postponement of the examination pending the infant plaintiff’s return. On this record, we are of the opinion that it is onerous and presently unnecessary to compel the infant plaintiff to travel round trip across the ocean for this examination before trial (cf. *Holcomb*v. *Union Confectionery Mach, Co.,*280 App. Div. 252). We are also of the opinion that under the particular circumstances here, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to grant an order having such an effect. If the infant plaintiff’s absence from this continent is unreasonably protracted beyond the time of her expected return, defendant *959may move, upon proper papers, to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.