alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hurco Companies, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of  section 13(a)  or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Michael Doar
Michael Doar
Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer
January 16, 2004



<PAGE>
                                                                 exhibit 32.2


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hurco Companies, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.





/s/ Roger J. Wolf
-----------------------------------------------------
Roger J. Wolf
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
January 16, 2004
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1599 

Condemning the death threats against Representative Nancy Mace. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 26, 2024 

Mrs. LUNA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the death threats against Representative Nancy 

Mace. 

Whereas, on November 18, 2024, Representative Nancy Mace 

introduced a resolution prohibiting Members, officers, 

and employees of the House from using single-sex facilities other than those corresponding to their biological 

sex; 

Whereas, after introduction of this resolution, Representative 

Nancy Mace has received multiple death threats; 

Whereas one of the death threats came from a video posted 

on social media with the statement ‘‘This video goes out 

to Congresswoman Nancy Mace. Congresswoman Nancy 

Mace, I hope that one day I do find you in that woman’s 

bathroom and I grab your ratty looking f—ing hair and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1599 IH 

drag your face down to the floor while I repeatedly bash 

it in until the blood’s everywhere and you’re dead.’’; 

Whereas another death threat came from a phone call with 

a blocked number where it was stated that ‘‘We’re killing 

her. She’ll die today.’’; 

Whereas another death threat came from a post on social 

media with the statement ‘‘Prepare to die 

@repnancymace.’’; 

Whereas another death threat came from a phone call where 

it was stated ‘‘Nancy Mace doesn’t deserve to be alive.’’; 

Whereas another death threat came from a phone call where 

it was stated ‘‘Kill yourself motherf—er.’’; 

Whereas another death threat came from a phone call where 

it was stated ‘‘We know where you are, we’re going to 

kill you, Nancy.’’; and 

Whereas another death threat came from a phone call where 

it was stated ‘‘I never pray but I’m praying that Nancy 

Mace gets Stage 4 Ovarian Cancer and her children have 

to watch her suffer.’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) strongly condemns the death threats being 

3 sent to Representative Nancy Mace; and 

4 (2) condemns all threats of violence. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Michael H. Prendergast, Individually and as Chairman of the Democratic State Committee of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Mae Gurevich, as Vice-Chairman of the Democratic State Committee of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Order and judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
# Supreme Court of Florida

THURSDAY, MARCH 13 , 2014

CASE NO(S).: SC12

- 157 Lower Tribunal No.: 5D09

- 1488; 5D09

- 2091; 05

- 2007

- CA

- 22134

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY vs. ROBIN CURRAN

Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) Respondent’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees for services rendered in this Court pursuant to section 627.428, Florida Statutes (2011), is hereby provision ally granted and remanded to the trial court to determine the amount. Respondent’s additional request for a conditional award of fees and costs pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2011), is hereby denied. Respondent’s motion
for review of the Fif th District’s order denying respondent’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees is hereby denied as untimely pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(c). Petitioner’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees and costs for services
rendered in this Court pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes, is hereby
denied.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. POLSTON, C.J., dissents with an opinion, in which CANADY, J., concurs.
POLSTON, C.J., dissenting.

Because I would order the tr ial court to vacate the judgment against State Farm, I would deny Curran’s motion for attorney’s fees and grant State Farm’sCase No. SC12

- 157 Page 2

motion for attorney’s fees, conditioned upon the trial court’s finding that State
Farm is entitled to f ees pursuant to its proposal for settlement.

CANADY, J., concurs.

A True Copy Test:

__________________________ John A. Tomasino Clerk, Supreme Court

Served: HON. PAMELA R. MASTERS, CLERK ELIZABETH KOEBEL RUSSO THE TURNER LAW FIRM, LLC O. JOHN ALPIZ AR MARJORIE GADARIAN GRAHAM GARY M. FARMER BARD DANIEL ROCKENBACH HON. BRUCE WALDRON JACOBUS, JUDGE HON. MITCH NEEDELMAN, CLERK
#### § 50.7 Information requirements.

The reporting requirements concerning the suspension or withdrawal of solicitation privileges have been assigned Report Control Symbol (RCS) DD-P&R(Q)2182 in accordance with DoD 8910.1-M.[12]

###### Footnotes -
  50.7

[12] See footnote 1 to § 50.3.
#### § 552.169 Yakima Training Center Area Access Office.

The Yakima Training Center DPCA functions as the Area Access Officer (AAO).
#### SPEAR, Appellant, v. AMERICAN SERVICE UNION, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by Maude E. Spear, executrix, etc., of Arthur H. Spear, deceased, against the American Service Union.

No opinion. Motion denied.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sasol Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending 30 June 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



|Date: 21 November 2007 |  |     |  |                                                    
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | By: |  | /s/ LAWRENCE PATRICK ADRIAN DAVIES                 
|                       |  |     |  | Lawrence Patrick Adrian Davies
Chief executive     
|Date: 21 November 2007 |  |     |  |                                                    
|                       |  | By: |  | /s/ KANDIMATHIE CHRISTINE RAMON                    
|                       |  |     |  | Kandimathie Christine Ramon
Chief Financial officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Sasol Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even if the document with which it is
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.

---



QuickLinks
### Part F—Global Catastrophic Risk Management

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Part was enacted as part of the Global Catastrophic Risk Management Act of 2022 and also as part of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, and not part of the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 which comprises this chapter.
### §488. Definitions

In this part:

#### (1) Ammonium nitrate

The term "ammonium nitrate" means—

(A) solid ammonium nitrate that is chiefly the ammonium salt of nitric acid and contains not less than 33 percent nitrogen by weight; and

(B) any mixture containing a percentage of ammonium nitrate that is equal to or greater than the percentage determined by the Secretary under section 488a(b) of this title.

#### (2) Ammonium nitrate facility

The term "ammonium nitrate facility" means any entity that produces, sells or otherwise transfers ownership of, or provides application services for ammonium nitrate.

#### (3) Ammonium nitrate purchaser

The term "ammonium nitrate purchaser" means any person who purchases ammonium nitrate from an ammonium nitrate facility.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §899A, as added Pub. L. 110–161, div. E, title V, §563(a), Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2083.)
#### § 536.59 Settlement or approval authority.

“Settlement authority” is a statutory term (10 U.S.C. 2735) meaning that officer authorized to approve, deny or compromise a claim, or make final action. “Approval authority” means the officer empowered to settle, pay or compromise a claim in full or in part, provided the claimant agrees. “Final action authority” means the officer empowered to deny or make a final offer on a claim. Determining the proper officer empowered to approve or make final action on a claim depends on the claims statute involved and any limitations that apply under that statute. DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-69, outlines how various authority is delegated among offices.
§ 631.6 Responsibilities. ( a ) Regional Directors of the Army Installation Management Agency, Air Force commanders, Navy regional commanders, Marine Corps commanders, and Coast Guard commanders will— ( 1 ) Determine level and degree of participation by subordinate commanders in joint Service boards, when appropriate.
( 2 ) Resolve differences among subordinate commanders regarding board areas of responsibility, and the designation of sponsoring commanders.
( 3 ) Evaluate board recommendations, and actions from subordinate sponsoring commanders.
( 4 ) Forward recommendations to HQDA, OPMG (DAPM-MPD-LE), WASH DC 20310-2800, regarding circumstances that require Service headquarters action or programs having widespread applicability.
( 5 ) Ensure that subordinate commanders assess the availability of drug abuse paraphernalia in the vicinity of Department of Defense (DOD) installations through their AFDCBs, according to DOD Directive 1010.4. Coast Guard commanders should refer to COMDTINST M1000.6 series, chapter 20, for guidance on Coast Guard substance abuse policies.
( b ) Military installation commanders for off-installation enforcement actions will— ( 1 ) Conduct off-installation operations as authorized by law and Service policy.
( 2 ) Coordinate off-installation operations with other Service commanders, as applicable, for uniformity of effort, and economy of resources.
( 3 ) Assist Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies within the limits imposed by law and DOD policy.
( c ) Sponsoring commanders will provide administrative support for AFDCB programs to include the following— ( 1 ) Promulgating implementing directives, and convening the board.
( 2 ) Providing a recorder for the board.
( 3 ) Providing copies of the minutes of board meetings to other Service commanders who are represented on the board, and to other AFDCBs as appropriate.
( 4 ) Approving or disapproving the minutes, and recommendations of the board, and making appropriate distribution, as required.
( 5 ) Publishing lists of “off-limits” establishments and areas.
( 6 ) Ensuring that responsible individuals are notified of any unfavorable actions being contemplated or taken regarding their establishments per Annex A of appendix A of this part.
( 7 ) Distributing pertinent information to the following— ( i ) All units within their jurisdictional area.
( ii ) Units stationed in other areas whose personnel frequent their area of jurisdiction.
( 8 ) Ensuring that procedures are established to inform all Service personnel, including those who may be visiting or are in a travel status, of off-limits restrictions in effect within the respective AFDCB's jurisdictional area.
#### § 912.846 Individual civil penalties.

Part 846 of this chapter, *Individual Civil Penalties,* shall apply to the assessment of individual civil penalties under section 518(f) of the Act.

[53 FR 3676, Feb. 8, 1988]
§ 1630.14 Class 1-D-E: Exemption of certain members of a reserve component or student taking military training. In Class 1-D-E shall be placed any registrant who: ( a ) Is a student enrolled in an officer procurement program at a military college the curriculum of which is approved by the Secretary of Defense; or
( b ) Has been enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) at least ten days prior to his scheduled induction date; or
( c ) Has been transferred to a reserve component of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps or Coast Guard after a period of extended active duty, which was not for training only.
#### § 536.5 The Judge Advocate General.

TJAG has worldwide Army Staff responsibility for administrative settlement of claims by and against the U.S. government, generated by employees of the U.S. Army and DOD components other than the Departments of the Navy and Air Force. Where the Army has single-service responsibility, TJAG has responsibility for the Army. See DODD 5515.9. Certain claims responsibilities of TJAG are exercised by The Assistant Judge Advocate General (TAJAG) as set forth in this part and directed by TJAG.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and the consolidated statement of operations and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      10,699,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               49,022,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,120,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 94,871,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           175,070,000
<PP&E>                                     475,582,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             153,771,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             531,723,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      155,054,000
<BONDS>                                    374,032,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (72,036,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               531,723,000
<SALES>                                     92,067,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            92,067,000
<CGS>                                       69,382,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               69,382,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               233,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,333,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,156,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (820,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,336,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,366,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)


</TABLE>
§ 537.10 Recovery procedures. ( a ) Recovery personnel have three means of enforcing recovery following initial assertion. ( 1 ) Referral to litigation pursuant to § 537.11;
( 2 ) The head of an ACO should request Chief, Litigation Division, OTJAG to have the RJA appointed as a Special Assistant United States Attorney when the following criteria are met: ( i ) Filing suit is a frequent necessity, e.g., insurance companies are refusing payment on small claims either by raising issues well settled or by regularly reducing the amount of medical care as not fair and reasonable;
( ii ) The local U.S. Attorney's office is in favor of such appointment due to his previous experience with the RJA and the additional burden of affirmative claims litigation on his staff;
( iii ) The RJA has at least two years experience and is likely to continue in the RJA assignment for at least one year; and
( iv ) Commander USARCS concurs in the appointment and is willing to furnish support.
( 3 ) The RJA may request that the attorney representing the injured party include the amount asserted by the United States as part of special damages. The injured party's attorney may not represent the United States nor may the United States pay attorney fees as this would be in violation of 5 U.S.C. 3106. Where indicated, this arrangement should be reduced to writing. Be mindful that the attorney's duty to the injured party is in conflict with the interests of the United States where the amount potentially recoverable is small in comparison to the amount asserted by the United States. In this event the RJA should pursue recovery independently.
( b ) Careful monitoring of all assertions is required to insure timely follow-up resulting in collection or suit where indicated. Installation of a suspense system to avoid the expiration of the statute of limitations is essential. Recommendations to file suit should be forwarded by the RJA well prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. Within six months prior to the running of the statute of limitations, USARCS must be notified of the status of the claim or potential claim. Follow-up demands should precede filing suit to create a written record of efforts to avoid suit. Personal contact with all parties is encouraged. When represented, contact the representative.
( c ) Sources other than vehicle liability coverage should be exhausted in cases where the amount of the potential recovery exceeds $50,000 and the coverage is small. Coordination with USARCS is required. USARCS can obtain expert witnesses for medical malpractice cases, product liability cases, or other cases in which another tortfeasor may be involved.
### Part E—Administration
#### § 1602.6 Board.

The word *board* when used alone, unless the context otherwise indicates, includes a local board, district appeal board, and the National Appeal Board and panels thereof.
### §577. Urban and other high risk area communications capabilities

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, in consultation with the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission and the Secretary of Defense, and with appropriate State, local, and tribal government officials, shall provide technical guidance, training, and other assistance, as appropriate, to support the rapid establishment of consistent, secure, and effective interoperable emergency communications capabilities in the event of an emergency in urban and other areas determined by the Secretary to be at consistently high levels of risk from natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters.

#### (b) Minimum capabilities

The interoperable emergency communications capabilities established under subsection (a) shall ensure the ability of all levels of government, emergency response providers, the private sector, and other organizations with emergency response capabilities—

(1) to communicate with each other in the event of an emergency;

(2) to have appropriate and timely access to the Information Sharing Environment described in section 485 of this title; and

(3) to be consistent with any applicable State or Urban Area homeland strategy or plan.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XVIII, §1807, as added Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §671(b), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1441.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,224,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               47,213,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,787,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 81,394,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           146,893,000
<PP&E>                                     487,076,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             186,313,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             481,382,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      216,858,000
<BONDS>                                    301,344,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       151,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (100,560,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               481,382,000
<SALES>                                     51,770,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,770,000
<CGS>                                       38,705,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,705,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               179,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,159,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,840,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (713,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,127,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,231,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,896,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.59)


</TABLE>
#### William E. Moan, appellee, v. G. P. Racine, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,824.

Suit to recover balance of contract price of oil-burning heater. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Bedinger, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first *642division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and judgment of *nil capiat.*

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

Joseph Granick and Edward N. Sherburne, for appellant.

Ela, Grover & March, for appellee; Gerald L. McMullen, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Matehett

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### ADAMS, Appellant, v. CLEWS et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Nellie C. Adams against Henry Clews and others. W. J. Woods, for appellant. F. Bartlett, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.