alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Annual Report of Rurban Financial Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Kenneth A. Joyce, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Duane L. Sinn, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Kenneth A. Joyce                        /s/ Duane L. Sinn
---------------------------------------     ------------------------------------
Kenneth A. Joyce,                           Duane L. Sinn
President and Chief Executive Officer       Executive Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer

Dated: March 24, 2006                       Dated: March 24, 2006

*     This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and
      shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act
      or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification
      shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under
      the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the
      Company specifically incorporates it by reference in such filing.

                                                                            113.
#### § 536.21 Annual claims award.

The Commander USARCS will make an annual claims award to outstanding field offices. See DA Pam 27-162, para 1-23 for more information on annual claims awards.
#### In the Matter of Louis W. Vymer, an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement to the Bar granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      12,626,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,691,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    153,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,200,000
<PP&E>                                       2,029,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,206,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          724,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,335,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,206,000
<SALES>                                      7,665,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,665,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,402,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,173,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,147,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,026,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,026,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Using the Science of Science to Document and Accelerate Progress in Treating Alzheimer's Disease.                    

*Date:*                         February 12, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         12:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joshua Jin-Hyouk Park, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6208,                         *joshua.park4@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 29, 2020.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-29144 Filed 1-4-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §312106. Consultation with National Park System Advisory Board

In carrying out its functions under this chapter, the National Trust may consult with the National Park System Advisory Board on matters relating to the selection of sites, buildings, and objects to be preserved and protected pursuant to this chapter.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3251.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 312106 | 16 U.S.C. 468d. | Oct. 26, 1949, ch. 735, §5, 63 Stat. 929. |

Section

The words "National Park System Advisory Board" are substituted for "Advisory Board on National Parks, Historic Sites, Buildings, and Museums" because the Board was renamed when section 3 of the Act of August 21, 1935 (known as the Historic Sites, Buildings, and Antiquities Act (ch. 593, 49 Stat. 667)) was amended by section 9 of Public Law 91–383, as added by section 2 of Public Law 94–458 (90 Stat. 1940).
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-2423WA

_____________ Arkansas Emergency Transport LLC, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States City of Texarkana, Arkansas, * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Defendant, *

__________________ * [UNPUBLISHED] * Lifenet, Inc., * * Movant-Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: December 10, 1997

Filed: December 17, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Lifene t, Inc. appeals the district court's order denying Lifenet's motion fo r intervention. Lifenet's appeal is nothing more than an extension of Lifenet's Johnny

come-lately attempt to intervene after Lifenet's litigation strategy to stay out of this case to bolst er the City of Texarkana's argument that Arkansas Emergency Transport' s complaint should be dis missed because Lifenet was a necessary party backfired when-2-

the distr ict court resolved the issue of the City's liability in Arkansas Emergenc y Transport's favor. We review the district court's ruling on the timeliness of a motion to intervene as a matter of right under a well-established standard, and we are satisfied the district court correctly applied the controlling law. We thus affirm on the basis of the district court's ruling without further discussion. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2008142EN.01003801.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/38

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 23 April 2008 — Pickering v Commission

(Case F-103/05) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Remuneration - Correction coefficients - Transfer of part of remuneration out of the country of employment - Pensions - Default proceedings - Temporal application of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure - Pay slips - Plea of illegality - Equal treatment of officials - Principle of protection of legitimate expectations, acquired rights, principle of legal certainty and the duty to have regard for the interests of officials - Obligation to state reasons)

(2008/C 142/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Stephen Pickering (La Hulpe, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Joris and D. Martin, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the applicant's pay slips for the months of December 2004 and January and February 2005, and of all subsequent pay slips, in so far as they apply the allegedly unlawful provisions of Regulation No 723/2004 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials, concerning the transfer of part of remuneration to the official's country of origin (formerly Case T-393/05).

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 10 of 14.1.2006, p. 27 (Case originally registered at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-393/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15 December 2005).

1

---
NO. 07-11-0139-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 9, 2012

HARVEY BRAMLETT JR. and JASON BLAKENEY,  

Appellants 

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, et al.,

Appellees

_____________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 99,017-00-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS WOODBURN, PRESIDING

***Memorandum Opinion***

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Harvey Bramlett Jr. and Jason Blakeney, indigent inmates, appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their lawsuit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and specified individual employees of the Department (collectively referred to as “the Department”).  Though they allege various issues, we need only address one.  It pertains to the trial court’s execution of the dismissal order several months after the two inmates moved to recuse the trial judge.  We reverse and remand.

On November 10, 2010, the district clerk of Potter County received “Plaintiffs[‘] Verified Motion for Recusal.”  They alleged therein that the trial judge was subject to recusal because he was a defendant in a separate lawsuit they initiated against him.  Nothing of record indicates that the trial judge either denied the motion or forwarded it to the regional presiding judge for disposition.  Nor does anyone contend that such was done.  Instead, and in apparent response to the Department’s motion to dismiss, the trial judge executed a “Final Judgment” dismissing the cause on March 14, 2011.

Once a party files a motion to recuse, the trial court has the obligation to either recuse himself or request the presiding judge of the administrative judicial district to assign a judge to hear the matter.  Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(c).  And, “[e]xcept for good cause stated in the order in which further action is taken, the judge shall make no further orders and shall take no further action in the case after filing of the motion and prior to a hearing on the motion.”  *Id.* 18a(d).  More importantly, orders issued in contravention of Rule 18a(d) are void.  *In re Stearman*, 252 S.W.3d 113, 117 (Tex. App. –Waco 2008, orig. proceeding); *In re A.R.*, 236 S.W.3d 460, 477 (Tex. App.–Dallas 2007, no pet.).  Because the trial court did not comply with Rule 18a(c) once the motion to recuse was filed or 18a(d) when issuing its order dismissing the suit (*i.e.* provide good cause for proceeding), the dismissal order was and is void.

Accordingly, we reverse the “Final Judgment” and remand the cause.

Brian Quinn 

Chief Justice 

�Because the motion was filed and the dismissal executed before the 2011 changes to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 18a became effective, we apply the provisions of Rule 18a in existence before the 2011 changes.  But, the result would be the same irrespective of which rules were applied. 

2
### SUBCHAPTER VI—TREATMENT OF CHARITABLE TRUSTS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
August 14, 2015

Mr. Jay Jablonski

Vice President

Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company

One State Street

Hartford, CT 06103

Dear Mr. Jablonski:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a) and (b), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c) 

91.121, 91.151(a)(1) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (a)(2), and 91.417(a) 

and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 13, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Hartford Steam Boiler 

Inspection and Insurance Company into the public docket (No. FAA−2015−1904), but we are 

unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with 

the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you 

must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have. 

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MMI COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE TWELVE MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,150,622
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      57,981
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,259,422
<CASH>                                          13,323
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              26,418
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          28,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,959,409
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,184,399
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            141,939
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                118,817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,906
<OTHER-SE>                                     411,022
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,959,409
<PREMIUMS>                                     346,735
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             76,556
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               2,678
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  48,924
<BENEFITS>                                     291,481
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     56,217
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           105,502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                       164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 851,941
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            260,043
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               21,291
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              24,772
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               244,471
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                863,533
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                         21,291
        

</TABLE>
§ 516.3 Explanation of abbreviations and terms. ( a ) The Glossary contains explanations of abbreviations and terms.
( b ) The masculine gender has been used throughout this regulation for simplicity and consistency. Any reference to the masculine gender is intended to include women.
### Part E—Authorization of Appropriations
<PAGE>

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-10570)
of our report dated March 3, 2003, on the consolidated financial statements
of A.M.T Advanced Metal Technologies Ltd., appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2002.


/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.

BRIGHTMAN ALMAGOR & CO.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
A MEMBER OF DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU

Tel Aviv, Israel
June 25, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 6, 2011 

d0330 

Order 

 

April 6, 2011 

141845-46 

HEATHER SWANSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141845-46 

 COA: 275404; 278491 

St. Clair CC: 04-002438-NH 

PORT HURON HOSPITAL, a/k/a PORT 

HURON HOSPITAL MEDICAL GROUP, 

Defendant, 

and 

JEANNIE L. ROWE, D.O. and BLUEWATER 

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, P.C., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 28, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 CAVANAGH, MARILYN KELLY, and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
#### § 651.3 Explanation of abbreviations and terms.

Abbreviations and special terms used in this part are explained in the glossary in Appendix F of this part.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I,
David A. Dodd, certify that

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Serologicals Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 18, 2005

|/s/DAVID A. DODDPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks