alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         PACIFICARE HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                        STATE OF INCORPORATION
------------------                                        ----------------------

California Dental Health Plan                             California
Clinica Pasteur, Inc.                                     Florida
COMPREMIER, Inc.                                          California
Covantage, Inc.                                           Delaware
CRM Insurance Services, Inc.                              California
Dental Plan Administrators                                California
Interstate Medical Equipment, Inc.                        Florida
Oregon Health Management Company                          California
PacifiCare Administrative Services, Inc.                  California
PacifiCare Administrative Services of Florida, Inc.       Florida
PacifiCare Behavioral Health, Inc.                        Delaware
PacifiCare Behavioral Health of California, Inc.          Delaware
PacifiCare Benefit Administrators, Inc.                   Washington
PacifiCare Life and Health Insurance Company              Indiana
PacifiCare Life Insurance Company                         Arizona
PacifiCare Military Health Systems, Inc.                  Delaware
PacifiCare of California                                  California
PacifiCare of Florida, Inc.                               Florida
PacifiCare of Oklahoma, Inc.                              Oklahoma
PacifiCare of Oregon, Inc.                                Oregon
PacifiCare of Texas, Inc.                                 Texas
PacifiCare of Washington, Inc.                            Washington
PacifiCare Pharmacy Centers, Inc.                         California
PacifiCare Ventures, Inc.                                 California
PacifiCare Wellness Company                               California
PacifiClinic, P.C.                                        Oregon
PC-CWD Vista Associates                                   California
Pasteur Delivery Systems, Inc.                            Florida
Pasteur Systems, Inc.                                     Florida
Secure Horizons USA, Inc.                                 California
#### Clarence P. Bilhorn et al., Appellants, v Earl S. Lipman et al., Defendants, and Smith-Kline Corporation, Herein Sued as Smith, Kline & French Laboratories, Respondent.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the following memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to appellants. Memorandum: In this personal injury action brought against a physician, defendant Lipman, a pharmacy, defendant Clinton Drugs, and a drug manufacturer, defendant Smith-Kline Laboratories, plaintiffs appeal an order which denied their motion for production of the transcript of a meeting held at defendant Smith-Kline Laboaratories on September 30, 1957. An earlier protective order limited production of documents to those made between January 17, 1965, three years before plaintiffs’ first prescription for the drug in question, and February 15, 1972, the date of alleged injury by the drug. Plaintiffs did not appeal from the prior protective order and defendants assert that the doctrine of law of the case required denial of the present motion. This motion was made neither to renew nor to reargue the prior motion; however, the court, by its adherence to its original decision, impliedly granted reargument. Consequently, the present order superseded the original order and it is appealable *(Dennis v Stout,*24 AD2d 461). Therefore the propriety of the court’s ruling is properly before us. Inasmuch as the document in question may be relevant and material to the issue of defendant Smith-Kline’s knowledge of the dangerousness of the drug, the order should be modified to the extent of allowing discovery of this document *(Allen v Crowell-Collier Pub. Co.,*21 NY2d 403, 406-407). (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court-art 78.) Present-Moule, J. P., Simons, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Schnepp., JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

l0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

138266 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138266 

 COA: 280508 

Oakland CC: 2007-213591-FC 

ANTHONY QUARMARKIM ROWE, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Josey, Appellant.

Permission to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted. Appeal *1018may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief. Myron Komar, Esq., 101 Columbia St., Albany, New York, is hereby appointed counsel.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Environmental impact statement on theconstruction and operation of a proposed mixed oxide fuel fabrication facilityat the Savannah River site, South Carolina, final report.
 
Vol.1: Chapters1-8 & Appendices A-E
Vol. 2Appendices: F-L | L (1-102) | L (103-242) | L (243-348)
 
SuDoc Number: Y 3.N 88:10/1767/FINAL/V.1-2
Item Number1051-H-48 (online):
CGP System Number:001013550
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 22, 2017********
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-4752

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DENNIS AINSWORTH MCCARTHY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-98-26-R)

Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: May 14, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Joseph Damico, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert P.

Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Anthony P. Giorno, Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Ainsworth McCarthy was convicted by a jury for conspiring to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846

(1994) and possessing with intent to distribute marijuana in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994). He was sentenced to two

concurrent sentences of 121 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, he

maintains that: (1) the district court erred in denying his motion

to suppress the drugs seized because the officer exceeded the scope

of the consent to search; (2) the district court erred in granting

a willful blindness instruction; and (3) the district court improperly enhanced his sentence for obstruction of justice without

making the necessary findings.

After reviewing the record and the applicable law, we find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm McCarthy’s conviction and

sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         240,322                 240,322
<SECURITIES>                                   491,000                 491,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,069                   5,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                         257,273                 257,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                 216,986                 216,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,252,413               1,252,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     6,632,998               9,632,998
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,404,540)             (5,404,540)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,252,413               1,252,413
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,295                  57,213
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,448                 165,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (144,051)               (224,734)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                115,898                 116,228
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            115,898                 116,228
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   115,898                 116,228
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04                     .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04                     .04
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

The following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 and
is not filed as provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes -- Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics Research
Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:

(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ James P. Regan
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            James P. Regan
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            May 10, 2005
#### LEVY et al., Appellants, v. ARMSTRONG, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Isaac Levy and another against Walter J. Armstrong. J. Rosenzweig, for appellants. B. Johnson, for respondent.

No opinion. Crder affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Exhibit
10.41


 


Preparer                        Nathan
H. Sevilla, Esq., Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, 1675 Broadway, New York, NY
10019, (212) 506-2196


Information


 


SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE


FOR RECORDER


 


RELEASE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE


 


The undersigned, the
present owner of the mortgage hereinafter described, does hereby acknowledge
that a certain mortgage bearing date of the 13th day of May, 2005,
made and executed by DIAMOND JO WORTH, LLC
to WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC., AS AGENT
and recorded in the records of the office of the Recorder of the County of Worth,
State of Iowa, as document number 20051170 on the
16th Day of May, 2005 and encumbering the land set forth on Exhibit
A attached hereto is redeemed, paid off, satisfied and discharged in full.


 


Words and phrases herein,
including acknowledgment hereof, shall be construed as in the singular or
plural number, and as masculine, feminine or neuter gender, according to the
context.


 


Dated this 19th
day of July, 2005.


 


 


 


	
   

  	
  WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC.,

  
	
   

  	
  a California corporation, as Agent and as a Lender

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: 

  	
  /s/ Larissa Megerdichian

  
	
   

  	
  Name: 

  	
  Larissa Megerdichian

  
	
   

  	
  Title: 

  	
  Vice President

  
					



 

















 


EXHIBIT A


 


Legal Description of Real
Property


 


Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in Block 1 and lot 5 in Block
2, Top of Iowa Addition, Worth County, Iowa, according to the recorded plat
thereof.
### §570. Judicial review

Any agency action relating to establishing, assisting, or terminating a negotiated rulemaking committee under this subchapter shall not be subject to judicial review. Nothing in this section shall bar judicial review of a rule if such judicial review is otherwise provided by law. A rule which is the product of negotiated rulemaking and is subject to judicial review shall not be accorded any greater deference by a court than a rule which is the product of other rulemaking procedures.

(Added Pub. L. 101–648, §3(a), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4976, §590; renumbered §570, Pub. L. 102–354, §3(a)(2), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–354 renumbered section 590 of this title as this section.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1246 

Condemning the Department of State’s statement expressing condolences for 

the death of Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi, Foreign Minister AmirAbdollahian, and other members of their delegation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2024 

Mr. HUIZENGA (for himself, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. NORMAN, Mrs. MILLER of 

West Virginia, Mr. BURCHETT, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. MCCORMICK, Mr. 

FEENSTRA, Mr. MORAN, and Mrs. KIM of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the Department of State’s statement expressing 

condolences for the death of Iranian President Ebrahim 

Raisi, Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian, and other 

members of their delegation. 

Whereas Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi was notably referred to as the ‘‘Butcher of Tehran’’ and helped oversee 

the mass executions of thousands of political prisoners in 

1988 after the Iran-Iraq war; 

Whereas, in 2019, the Department of the Treasury sanctioned President Raisi for his participation ‘‘in a so-called 

‘death commission’ that ordered the extrajudicial executions of thousands of political prisoners’’; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1246 IH 

Whereas the Iranian regime, under President Raisi’s watch, 

subjected thousands of protesters to mass arrests, enforced disappearance, torture, and killings following nationwide protests; 

Whereas President Raisi supported the Iranian regime’s security services as they cracked down on dissent following 

the aftermath of the 2022 death of Masha Amini leading 

to more than 500 people killed and over 22,000 people 

detained; 

Whereas President Raisi supported the Iranian regime’s enrichment of uranium up to near-weapons-grade levels 

while denying international inspectors in a move to undermine Western ideals; 

Whereas President Raisi supported the April 2024 assault on 

Israel that saw over 300 drones and missiles fired from 

Iranian soil; 

Whereas the Iranian regime routinely provides about 

$100,000,000 annually to Palestinian terror groups that 

have killed Americans and have taken others hostage during the barbaric assault on Israel; and 

Whereas, on May 20, 2024, the Department of State released 

a press statement expressing ‘‘its official condolences for 

the death of Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi, Foreign 

Minister Amir-Abdollahian, and other members of their 

delegation in a helicopter crash in northwest Iran’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 demns the Department of State’s statement expressing 

3 condolences for the death of Iranian President Ebrahim 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1246 IH 

1 Raisi, Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian, and other 

2 members of their delegation. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### In re CLARK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 27, *11321903.)

In the matter of Eugene P. Olarb, an incompetent person.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals and to have questions certified denied, without costs. Held, that such leave is unnecessary. See Code Civ. Proc. §§ 190, 2336.
#### § 273.13 Policy.

It is DoD policy consistent with 41 CFR chapters 101 and 102 that excess DoD property must be screened and redistributed among the DoD Components, and reported as excess to the GSA. Pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 701, DoD will efficiently and economically dispose DoD FEPP.
EXHIBIT 32.3



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Duquesne Light Company (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Morgan K. OBrien, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 24th day of March, 2005.



/s/ Morgan K. OBrienMorgan K. OBrienPresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Company and will be retained by Duquesne Light Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Paperson reduction methods for photographic meteors.**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:1/2
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001057916
 
May 23, 2018
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wages in Department and Clothing Stores, Large Cities, Spring and Summer 1943

              																	Sherman, Joseph M. 						*Wages in Department and Clothing Stores, Large Cities, Spring and Summer 1943 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 801*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4272,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER