alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMultifrequency synthetic aperture radar antenna comparison studyThree multifrequency, dual polarization SAR antenna designs are reviewed. The SAR antenna design specifications were for a "straw man' SAR which would approximate the requirements for projected shuttle-based SAR's. Therefore, the physical dimensions were constrained to be compatible with the space shuttle. The electrical specifications were similar to those of SIR-A and SIR-B with the addition of dual polarization and the addition of C and X band operation. Early in the antenna design considerations, three candidate technologies emerged as having promise. They were: (1) microstrip patch planar array antennas, (2) slotted waveguide planar array antennas, and (3) open-ended waveguide planar array antennas.Document ID19840009366Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBlevins, B. A.*(New Mexico State Univ. Las Cruces, NM, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1983Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:171736NASA-CR-171736Accession Number84N17434Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-95519Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840009366.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wages in the Basic Lumber Industry, 1944

              																	Baril, Victor S.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wages in the Basic Lumber Industry, 1944 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 854*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4320,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 37.845 What data rights should I obtain? ( a ) You should seek to obtain what you, with the advice of legal counsel, judge is needed to ensure future Government use of technology that emerges from the research, as long as doing so is consistent with the balance between DoD interests described in § 37.840(b). You should consider data in which you wish to obtain license rights and data that you may wish to be delivered; since TIAs are assistance instruments rather than acquisition instruments, however, it is not expected that data would be delivered in most cases. What generally is needed is an irrevocable, world-wide license for the Government to use, modify, reproduce, release, or disclose for Governmental purposes the data that are generated under TIAs (including any data, such as computer software, in which a recipient may obtain a copyright). A Governmental purpose is any activity in which the United States Government participates, but a license for Governmental purposes does not include the right to use, or have or permit others to use, modify, reproduce, release, or disclose data for commercial purposes.
( b ) You may negotiate licenses of different scope than described in paragraph (a) of this section when necessary to accomplish program objectives or to protect the Government's interests. Consult with legal counsel before negotiating a license of different scope.
( c ) In negotiating data rights, you should consider the rights in background data that are necessary to fully utilize technology that is expected to result from the TIA, in the event the recipient does not commercialize the technology or chooses to protect any invention as a trade secret rather than by a patent. If a recipient intends to protect any invention as a trade secret, you should consult with your intellectual property counsel before deciding what information related to the invention the award should require the recipient to report.
### **CHAPTER 13—AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—COLLEGE-AID LAND APPROPRIATION

Sec.
301.
Land grant aid of colleges.
302.
Method of apportionment and selection; issuance of land scrip.
303.
Management expenses paid by State.
304.
Investment of proceeds of sale of land or scrip.
305.
Conditions of grant.
306.
Repealed.
307.
Fees for locating land scrip.
308.
Reports by State governors of sale of scrip.
309.
Land grants in the State of North Dakota.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—COLLEGE-AID ANNUAL APPROPRIATION

321.
Secretary of Agriculture to administer annual college-aid appropriation.
322.
Annual appropriation.
323.
Racial discrimination by colleges restricted.
324.
Time, manner, etc., of annual payments.
325.
State to replace funds misapplied, etc.; restrictions on use of funds; reports by colleges.
326.
Ascertainment and certification of amounts due States; certificates withheld from States; appeal to Congress.
326a.
Annual appropriations for Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of the Marshall Islands, and Republic of Palau.
327.
Repealed.
328.
Power to amend, repeal, etc., reserved.
329.
Additional appropriation for agricultural colleges.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—RETIREMENT OF EMPLOYEES

331.
Retirement of land-grant college employees.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION WORK APPROPRIATION

341.
Cooperative extension work by colleges.
342.
Cooperative agricultural extension work; cooperation with Secretary of Agriculture.
343.
Appropriations; distribution; allotment and apportionment; Secretary of Agriculture; matching funds; cooperative extension activities.
343a to 343g. Repealed or Transferred.
344.
Ascertainment of entitlement of State to funds; time and manner of payment; State reporting requirements; plans of work.
345.
Replacement of diminished, lost or misapplied funds; restrictions on use; reports of colleges.
346, 347.
Repealed.
347a.
Disadvantaged agricultural areas.
348.
Rules and regulations.
349.
"State" defined.
#### Jessie Mangin et al., Appellants, v. P. T. and L. Construction Co., Respondent.

Motion by appellants to resettle the order of this court, dated May 23, 1960, to add the provision that “ the attachment is hereby reinstated.” Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision. Nolan, P. L, Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur. Motion by appellants to resettle order of this court, dated May 23, 1960, denied. On the court’s own motion, the decision of this court, handed down May 23, 1960 (10 A D 2-d 990), is amended by adding thereto the following paragraphs: “Defendant is given leave to serve its answer within ten days after the service of the order hereon, with notice of entry. Defendant is directed, within said ten days period, to file *1061and serve an undertaking, with corporate surety, to pay to plaintiffs any judgment which may be rendered in this action in favor of plaintiffs against defendant (Civ. Prac. Act, § 587). The amount of the undertaking shall be equal to the amount of the settlement of defendant’s action against Kennedy Park Homes, Inc.” An order upon this amended decision will be entered accordingly. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMorphology and movements of polarization features on VenusGround and spacecraft based polarization observations of Venus detected the signature of the so called 1-micron radius cloud particles that constitute the main cloud deck on Venus, as well as that of sub-micron sized particles that form a haze above this main cloud layer. Whether such observations showed any local clustering or organization in the polarimetry data remained uncertain until the relatively high resolution observations from the Pioneer Venus Orbiter Cloud Photopolarimeter (OCPP) became available. The available polarization data from this instrument was studied to see whether local organization was present, to study the morphology of such features or polarization clouds, and finally, to see if they can be followed in a sequence of observations to study their motions.Document ID19840010069Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLimaye, S. S.*(Wisconsin Univ. Madison, WI, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 30, 1982Subject CategoryLunar And Planetary ExplorationReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-166464NAS 1.26:166464Accession Number84N18137Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG2-93Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840010069.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We have issued our reports dated February 11, 2000 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Michael Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries which
are incorporated by reference or included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Michael Foods, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999. We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of
Michael Foods, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-31914 effective November 21, 1989,
and March 25, 1997 as amended; File Nos. 33-64076 and 33-64078 effective June 9,
1993, and March 25, 1997 as amended; File No. 33-57969 effective March 7, 1995,
and March 25, 1997 as amended; and File Nos. 333-23949 and 333-85251 effective
March 25, 1997 and August 16, 1999 as amended).

                                                   /s/GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 11, 2000


                                       23
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 21


                    SUBSIDIARIES OF HICKORY TECH CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Jurisdiction of
              Subsidiaries                                    Incorporation
              ------------                                    -------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Mankato Citizens Telephone Company                            Minnesota
Mid-Communications, Inc.                                      Minnesota
Cable Network, Inc.                                           Minnesota
Heartland Telecommunications Company of Iowa, Inc.            Minnesota
Amana Colonies Telephone Company                              Minnesota
National Independent Billing, Inc.                            Minnesota
Collins Communications Systems Co.                            Minnesota
Crystal Communications, Inc.                                  Minnesota
Minnesota Southern Wireless Company                           Minnesota
</TABLE>

All such subsidiaries are 100%-owned by Hickory Tech Corporation. The 
financial statements of all such subsidiaries are included in the 
Consolidated Financial Statements of Hickory Tech Corporation.




                                    IV-31
Exhibit 13.2

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of Sasol Limited (Sasol) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management is required to assess the effectiveness of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether the Company's internal control over financial reporting is
effective.

Sasol's
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer to provide reasonable assurance
as to the reliability of Sasol's financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting practice, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorisations of our management and directors; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.

Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management
assessed the effectiveness of Sasol's internal control over financial reporting as of 30 June 2013. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in "Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (1992)". Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of
30 June 2013, Sasol's internal control over financial reporting was effective.

KPMG Inc.,
an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an opinion on the effectiveness of Sasol's internal control over financial reporting as stated in their
report which appears herein.

Date: 9 October 2013By:

/s/ DAVID EDWARD CONSTABLEDavid Edward Constable Chief Executive OfficerDate: 9 October 2013By:

/s/ PAUL VICTORPaul Victor Acting Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
### **CHAPTER 15—BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY**

Sec.
391.
Establishment of bureau; appointment of chief; duties.
392.
Repealed.
393.
Sale of pathological and zoological specimens; disposition of moneys.
394.
Repealed.
394a.
Overtime of employees working at establishments which prepare virus, serum, toxin, and analogous products.
395.
Fees for rabies diagnoses; disposition of moneys.
396.
Inspection of livestock, hides, animal products, etc.; place; charges; disposition of funds.
397.
Omitted.
398.
Purchase and testing of serums or analogous products; dissemination of test results.
399.
Domestic raising of fur-bearing animals; classification.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           4,271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,616)
<INVENTORY>                                     43,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,121
<PP&E>                                          89,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                (58,689)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,591
<BONDS>                                         44,474
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   161,539
<SALES>                                        168,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               294,052
<CGS>                                          116,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  217,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,437
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,152
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51


</TABLE>
exhibit 10.6





Hydroflo, Inc. and Thomas Barbee agree as of January 1, 2001, to amend the
EMPLOYMENT OFFER FOR THOMAS F. BARBEE to read as follows:


COMPENSATION:              $8333.33 per month cash (total $100,000.00 / annum)
                           based on a 5-day workweek.

The remainder of the provisions of employment under the offer remain unchanged.

HydroFlo, Inc.


By: /s/ Dennis Mast
    ------------------------------
        Dennis Mast, Chairman, CEO

    /s/ Thomas F. Barbee
    ------------------------------
        Thomas F. Barbee
#### § 21.220 What publications are in the DGARS?

The DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations comprise the principal element of the DGARS. The ASD(R&E) also may publish DGARS policies and procedures in DoD instructions and other DoD publications, as appropriate.

[85 FR 51240, Aug. 19, 2020]
§ 37.615 What standards do I include for financial systems of for-profit firms? ( a ) To avoid causing needless changes in participants' financial management systems, your expenditure-based TIAs will make for-profit participants that currently perform under other expenditure-based Federal procurement contracts or assistance awards subject to the same standards for financial management systems that apply to those other awards. Therefore, if a for-profit participant has expenditure-based DoD assistance awards other than TIAs, your TIAs are to apply the standards in 32 CFR 34.11. You may grant an exception and allow a for-profit participant that has other expenditure-based Federal Government awards to use an alternative set of standards that meets the minimum criteria in paragraph (b) of this section, if there is a compelling programmatic or business reason to do so. For each case in which you grant an exception, you must document the reason in the award file.
( b ) For an expenditure-based TIA, you are to allow and encourage each for-profit participant that does not currently perform under expenditure-based Federal procurement contracts or assistance awards (other than TIAs) to use its existing financial management system as long as the system, as a minimum: ( 1 ) Complies with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
( 2 ) Effectively controls all project funds, including Federal funds and any required cost share. The system must have complete, accurate, and current records that document the sources of funds and the purposes for which they are disbursed. It also must have procedures for ensuring that project funds are used only for purposes permitted by the agreement (*see* § 37.625).
( 3 ) Includes, if advance payments are authorized under § 37.805, procedures to minimize the time elapsing between the payment of funds by the Government and the firm's disbursement of the funds for program purposes.