alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8143a. Members of the National Teacher Corps

Subject to the provisions of this section, this subchapter applies to a member of the National Teacher Corps. In administering this subchapter for a member covered by this section—

(1) "performance of duty" does not include an act of a member while—

(A) on authorized leave; or

(B) absent from his assigned post of duty, except while participating in an activity authorized by or under the direction or supervision of the Commissioner of Education; and

(2) in computing compensation for disability or death, the monthly pay of a member is deemed his actual pay or that received at the minimum rate for GS–6, whichever is greater.

(Added Pub. L. 90–83, §1(66)(A), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 212.)

| Section of title 5 | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8143a | 20: 1105(b). | Nov. 8, 1965, Pub. L. 89–329, §515(b), 79 Stat. 1257. |

The words "a member of the National Teacher Corps" are substituted for "such members" on authority of 20 U.S.C. 1102, 1105(a). In paragraph (1)(B), the words "Commissioner of Education" are substituted for "Commissioner" on authority of 20 U.S.C. 1141(f). In paragraph (2), the words "at the minimum rate for GS–6" are substituted for "under the entrance salary for grade 6," and the reference to the General Schedule of the Classification Act of 1949 is omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Commissioner of Education of Department of Health, Education, and Welfare transferred to Secretary of Education by section 3441(a)(1) of Title 20, Education.
M. P. No. 77-114.

#### Thomas A. McCormick *v.*R. I. State Board of Elections.

*Keven A. McKenna,*for petitioner.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Stephen F. Achille,*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the writ shall issue forthwith.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Handleman Company (the Registrant) that the Annual Report of the Registrant on
Form 10-K for the period ended May 2, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 30, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ A. A. Koch                                                 
|                    |  |  |  | A. A. KOCH President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                    |  | 
|Date: July 30, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Rozanne Kokko                                              
|                    |  |  |  | ROZANNE KOKKO Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

These certifications are not deemed filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### Rose Albin, Respondent, v. Michael B. Albin, Appellant.

In an action for the partition of real property between parties formerly wife and husband, the defendant husband appeals from an order, of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 28, 1960, which denied his motion for summary judgment, granted summary judgment to the plaintiff wife and directed a reference to ascertain the respective rights of the parties in the property. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., concurs in the affirmance of the order insofar as it denied the husband’s motion for summary judgment; but dissents from the affirmance of the order insofar as it granted summary judgment to the wife, and votes to modify the order by striking out its provisions granting summary judgment to the plaintiff wife and directing a reference, with the following memorandum: Both parties to this appeal correctly concede that an agreement not to partition (real property), containing a limitation of time or an express contingency which might terminate the agreement, is valid and binding and constitutes a good defense to an action for partition. In the action at bar, the parties (formerly wife and husband) entered into an agreement wherein it was expressly agreed: (1) that the defendant husband should have the right to continue his occupancy of his medical office in the subject property after its ownership had changed from a tenancy by the entirety to a tenancy in common; and (2) that the defendant husband would not be obligated to consent to and join in any sale of the said property unless and until he should decide to vacate his office therein. It is my view that implicit in this agreement was the promise by the plaintiff wife that no sale of the property could be effected or compelled until the stated contingency should occur. In resisting the defendant husband’s motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff wife did not deny that under said agreement she had made such a promise. On the contrary, she contended only that the defendant should not be permitted to have the benefit of the defense which the agreement prima facie afforded him because, as she claimed, he had breached the agreement by failing to rent *934out the remaining portions of the property and thereby failed to endeavor to produce therefrom a profit over and above its carrying charges. In my opinion, the said agreement is ambiguous with respect to the alleged obligation on the part of the defendant husband to rent out the remaining portions of the premises; and this alleged obligation as well as its alleged breach by the defendant present triable issues of fact which require a denial of summary judgment as to both parties. [26 Misc 2d 383.]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 150 (Monday, August 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47479-47480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18864]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8405]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Turkmenistan

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), as carried forward by the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013, (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6) and Department of 
State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act with respect to 
Turkmenistan, and I hereby waive this restriction.
    This Determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the

[[Page 47480]]

Congress, and the determination shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: June 24, 2013.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-18864 Filed 8-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-46-P
```
§ 34.51 Termination. ( a ) Awards may be terminated in whole or in part only in accordance with one of the following: ( 1 ) By the grants officer, if a recipient materially fails to comply with the terms and conditions of an award.
( 2 ) By the grants officer with the consent of the recipient, in which case the two parties shall agree upon the termination conditions, including the effective date and, in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated.
( 3 ) By the recipient upon sending to the grants officer written notification setting forth the reasons for such termination, the effective date, and, in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated. The recipient must provide such notice at least 30 calendar days prior to the effective date of the termination. However, if the grants officer determines in the case of partial termination that the reduced or modified portion of the award will not accomplish the purposes for which the award was made, he or she may terminate the award in its entirety.
( b ) If costs are allowed under an award, the responsibilities of the recipient referred to in § 34.61(b), including those for property management as applicable, shall be considered in the termination of the award, and provision shall be made for continuing responsibilities of the recipient after termination, as appropriate.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1191 

Expressing support for the designation of May 4, 2024, as a ‘‘National 

Day of Reason’’ and recognizing the central importance of reason in 

the betterment of humanity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2024 

Mr. RASKIN (for himself, Mr. HUFFMAN, Ms. NORTON, and Ms. BROWNLEY) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 4, 2024, 

as a ‘‘National Day of Reason’’ and recognizing the 

central importance of reason in the betterment of humanity. 

Whereas the application of reason has been the essential precondition for humanity’s extraordinary scientific, medical, 

technological, and social progress since before the founding of the United States; 

Whereas reason provides vital hope today for confronting the 

environmental crises of today, including— 

(1) the civilizational emergency of climate change; 

(2) for advancing civil liberties for all, including the 

rights of LGBTQIA+ individuals and access to all reproVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:53 May 02, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1191.IH HR1191

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1191 IH 

ductive health care such as in-vitro fertilization, contraception, and abortion; and 

(3) for cultivating the rule of law, democratic institutions, justice, and peace among nations; 

Whereas America’s Founders insisted upon the primacy of 

reason and knowledge in public life, and drafted the Constitution to prevent official establishment of religion and 

to protect freedom of thought, speech, and inquiry in civil 

society; 

Whereas James Madison, author of the First Amendment 

and fourth President of the United States, stated, ‘‘The 

advancement and diffusion of knowledge is the only 

guardian of true liberty’’, and ‘‘Knowledge will forever 

govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own 

governors, must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives’’; and 

Whereas May 4, 2024, would be an appropriate date to designate as a ‘‘National Day of Reason’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

3 Day of Reason’’; and 

4 (2) encourages all citizens, residents, and visi5 tors to join in observing this day and focusing on the 

6 central importance of reason, critical thought, the 

7 scientific method, and free inquiry to resolving social 

8 problems and promoting the welfare of humankind. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### § 2103.51 Information Security Oversight Committee.

The NCS Information Security Oversight Committee shall be chaired by the Staff Counsel of the National Security Council Staff. The Committee shall be responsible for acting on all suggestions and complaints concerning the administration of the National Security Council information security program. The chairperson, who shall represent the NSC Staff on the Interagency Information Security Committee shall also be responsible for conducting an active oversight program to ensure effective implementation of Executive Order 12065.
#### § 1804.4 Suggestions and complaints.

NACIC welcomes suggestions or complaints with regard to its administration of the historical access program established pursuant to Executive Order 12958. Letters of suggestion or complaint should identify the specific purpose and the issues for consideration. NACIC will respond to all substantive communications and take such actions as determined feasible and appropriate.
RIN 2060-AR62 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: RobertJ Wayland 

 11/16/2012 01:41 PM 

 Cc: Peter Tsirigotis, Bill Maxwell, Karen Thundiyil 

 

Hi all, 

We have concluded review of RIN 2060-AR62, “National Emission Standards 

for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam 

Generating Units.” 

 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 1 1 , 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00821

- CV

Ha Duong Nhu and D&H Restaurant Equipment, Appellant

v.

Hunan Ranch Corporation, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND SHANNON *

REVERSED AND REMANDED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SHANNON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on June 30, 2014 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the district court’s judgment

. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s judgment and

remands the case to the district court for a ne w trial on the issue of lost profits. The appellee

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.

* Before Bob E. Shannon, Chief Justice (retired), Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment

. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 74.003(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1653
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               79
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1653
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    94
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       17
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.95)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered September 3, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00299-CR

JOSE MONTADELGADO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-53575-L

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 28, 2020 pro se motion for access to 

the record in order to file a pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. Appellant’s 

motion is GRANTED.

We ORDER appellate counsel Lawrence B. Mitchell to provide appellant 

with copies of the clerk’s and reporter’s records. We FURTHER ORDER Mr. 

Mitchell to provide this Court, within TWENTY-ONE DAYS of the date of this 

order, with written verification that the record has been sent to appellant.
–2–

Appellant’s pro se response to the Anders brief is due by November 20, 

2020. If appellant does not file a pro se response by November 20, 2020, the 

appeal will be submitted upon the brief of counsel. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order, by 

electronic transmission, to the Honorable Carter Thompson, Presiding Judge, 

Criminal District Court No. 5; Lawrence B. Mitchell; and the Dallas County 

District Attorney’s Office.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order, by firstclass mail, to Jose Montedelgado, BIN # 19014731, North Tower, 6E04, P.O. Box 

660334, Dallas, Texas 75266-0334. 

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
### §20903. Guaranteed minimum payment amount

#### (a) In general

In addition to any other payments made under this subchapter, the Administrator shall make a payment to each State to which a payment is made under either section 20901 or 20902 of this title and with respect to which the aggregate amount paid under such sections is less than $5,000,000 in an amount equal to the difference between the aggregate amount paid to the State under sections 20901 and 20902 of this title and $5,000,000. In the case of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and the United States Virgin Islands, the previous sentence shall be applied as if each reference to "$5,000,000" were a reference to "$1,000,000".

#### (b) Pro rata reductions

The Administrator shall make such pro rata reductions to the amounts described in sections 20901(d) and 20902(c) of this title as are necessary to comply with the requirements of subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 107–252, title I, §103, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15303 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Alaska Maritime
National Wildlife
Refuge

x

Rat___+y .
Island Nes,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                      19,338,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,460,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,419,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,400,000
<INVENTORY>                                 58,966,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            98,875,000
<PP&E>                                     260,971,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             145,847,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             238,152,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       97,617,000
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,350,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               238,152,000
<SALES>                                    203,037,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           203,037,000
<CGS>                                      151,240,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              151,240,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            65,069,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,251,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,523,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,523,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,523,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.51)


</TABLE>
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1408 

Recognizing August 6, National Night Out, the national coming together 

of Americans all over the Nation to unite and promote public safety. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2024 

Mrs. TORRES of California (for herself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing August 6, National Night Out, the national coming together of Americans all over the Nation to unite 

and promote public safety. 

Whereas, on the first Tuesday of August, the Nation will observe National Night Out, a day to cultivate a better relationship between residents of a community and their 

local law enforcement, and to promote public safety; 

Whereas the participation in National Night Out by over 

38,000,000 neighbors in over 16,000 communities across 

the United States for over 40 years is inspiring; 

Whereas the relationship between local law enforcement and 

the residents which they are sworn to protect is important in creating a true sense of community; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1408 IH 

Whereas general awareness of public safety has improved, because of the continued efforts of communities to meet 

their law enforcement officers and participate in National 

Night Out activities; and 

Whereas National Night Out not only includes Americans on 

the mainland, but includes those in United States territories and military bases to ensure all are included in the 

effort of community building and public safety awareness: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) encourages law enforcement departments to 

3 use National Night Out to improve relationships 

4 with the communities they serve; 

5 (2) encourages public safety departments to in6 form communities— 

7 (A) how to most effectively contact their 

8 911 responders and emergency service pro9 viders; and 

10 (B) how they carry out their duties; and 

11 (3) recognizes the impact that has been made 

12 for over 40 years in communities all over the United 

13 States of America by National Night Out in creating 

14 a more united country by fostering relationships be15 tween residents, neighbors, and local law enforce16 ment, and promoting public safety awareness. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB