Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data fro

fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not 

supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in t

if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 se

runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one 

one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet.

yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop-down lists. You do not need to 

cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. 

resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls 

(example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksh

2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. 

spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission 

results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or c

family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter bot

Hg+2, or if the Ontario-Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg0, HgP, and Hg

Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General ins

follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample.

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop-downs in the Fuel Type Selection 

You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more sa

then enter an input rate of zero. 

2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided.

3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate.

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information fie

Emission Data
1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while other

If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) 

ppmvd @ 7% O2(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both.

2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used 

Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010).

3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information fie

4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for p

enter these data.
nformation about emission data from fossil 

ses where the test methods are not currently 

nly be used if the method is not in the ERT or 

T. You must complete at least 3 separate 

sheet is intended to be used for one boiler of 

copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in 

down lists. You do not need to populate 

rmation worksheet. Please name each 

nit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls 

ler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 

ent family required for this analysis. On each 

fuel input information, and emission test 

d depending on the constituent or constituent 

Mercury requires that you enter both Hg0 and 

, HgP, and Hg+2. However, both the Speciated 

low you to use a drop-down provided in the 

at you have results for. General instructions 

er Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. 

fuel types entered in one or more samples, 

he Other Supporting Information field.
erent units of measure, while others do not. 

b/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and 

, you are required to provide both.

mple given in the Test Method Used field. 

ethod (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010).

he Other Supporting Information field.

 method you are entering data for please also 
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1
Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICR
lectronic ICR
EIA Facility Code

Facility 

Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Measured 

Value 

(ppm)

Basis 

(Wet or 

Dry)

Test 

Method 

Used 

Run Number Test Start 

Date

Test Start 

Time

Test End 

Time

CO Emission Test Results

Test End 

Date
Data Flag 

(ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test 

Method 

Comments

lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 

7% O2

Steam 

Output 

(1000 

lb/hr)

Total 

Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/h

r)

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

mission Test Results Calculated Emission 

Rate
Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measure

ment 

Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measure

ment 

Method

Flue Gas 

Temperat

ure (F)

Fuel #1 Fuel #2 Flue Gas 

Flow 

Rate 

(dscfm)
Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measure

ment 

Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measure

ment 

Method

Fuel #3 Fuel #4 Other 

Supporti

ng 

Informati

on
EIA Facility 

Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time
Measured Value 

(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL)

Formaldehyde Emission Test Results
Test Method 

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O2

Steam Output (1000 

lb/hr)

Total Heat Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Calculated Emission Rate
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)

Fuel #1 Flue Gas 

Moisture (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas Flow 

Rate (dscfm)
Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Fuel #2 Fuel #3
Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #4

Other Supporting Information
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time
Measured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test End Date Test End Time

Methane Emission T
Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test Method 

Comments lb/mmBtu

Methane Emission Test Results Calculated Emission Rate
ppmdv @ 7% O2

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

lated Emission Rate

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)
Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Flue Gas 

Temperat

ure (F)

Fuel #1 Fuel #2
Measurement 

Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Fuel #3 Fuel #4
Measurement 

Method

Other Supporting 

Information
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date
Measured Value 

(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Test End Time

SO2 Emission Test Results
Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test Method 

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O

2

Calculated Emission Rate
Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

CO

2

 (%)

Flue Gas O2

 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #1 Fuel #2
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #3 Fuel #4
Other Supporting Information
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time
Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Measured Value 

(μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test End Time

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Em

Test End Date
 starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test Method 

Comments (lb/mmBtu)

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)
Fuel Input Rate

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F)

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)
Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate

Fuel #1 Fuel #2
Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #3 Fuel #4
 QA/QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1 

Mass (ng)

Section 2 

Mass (ng)

Total 

Mass (ng)

Initial 

Spike 

(ng)

Total NonSpike (ng)

Other Supporting Information
Sample 

Volume 

(dscm)

Volume 

Difference (%)

Volume Diff. 

Limit

Breaktrough 

(%)

Breaktrough 

Limit

Concentration 

(μg/dscm) Trap ID

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of 

Section 1 Hg 

mass for Hg 

conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 

Trap #1
Section 1 

Mass

Section 2 

Mass

Total 

Mass

Initial 

Spike

Total NonSpikeSample 

Volume

Volume 

Difference (%)

Volume Diff. 

Limit

≤20% of field 

recovery test

Trap #2
Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough 

Limit

Concentration 

(μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit Crec

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spik

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or 

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 

μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1 

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for 

Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 
R (%) by 

Run Ravg (%) Limit

Average 

Recovery, 

between 85 and 

115%

Measured Spike Recovery ( R )

#DIV/0!
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time
Measured Hg

0

 Value 

(μg/dscm)

Measured Hg+2 Value 

(μg/dscm)

Test End Date Test End Time
Measured HgP

 Value 

(μg/dscm)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL)

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results
Test Method 

Comments

Total Mercury 

(lb/mmBtu)

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture (%)

Flue Gas 

CO

2

 (%)
Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #1 Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)
Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #2 Fuel #3
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Other Supporting Information

Fuel #4
EIA Facility Code

Facility 

Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Speciated Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data

2-Hexanone 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Benzene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Bromochloromethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Bromodichloromethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Bromomethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Carbon disulfide 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Carbon tetrachloride 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Chlorobenzene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Chloroform 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Chloromethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Methylene Chloride 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

p-Isopropyltoluene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Tetrachloroethylene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Toluene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Trichlorofluoromethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

Xylenes (isomer & mixtures) 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM

2-Hexanone 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Benzene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Bromochloromethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Bromodichloromethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Bromomethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Carbon disulfide 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Carbon tetrachloride 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Chlorobenzene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Chloroform 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Chloromethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Dichlorodifluoromethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Methylene Chloride 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

p-Isopropyltoluene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Tetrachloroethylene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Toluene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Trichlorofluoromethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

Xylenes (isomer & mixtures) 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM

2-Hexanone 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Benzene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Bromochloromethane 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Bromodichloromethane 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Bromomethane 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Carbon disulfide 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Carbon tetrachloride 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Chlorobenzene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Chloroform 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Chloromethane 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Compound 

(use drop down to define for as many rows as 

needed)

Run 

Number

Test Start 

Date

Test Start 

Time

Test End 

Date

Test End 

Time
Dichlorodifluoromethane

3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Methylene Chloride3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

p-Isopropyltoluene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Tetrachloroethylene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Toluene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Trichlorofluoromethane3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Xylenes (isomer & mixtures)3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM






Footnote

s:

* Front half fraction contains filter, cyclone, and cartridge

** Back half fraction contains condensate, solvent, impingers

Measured 

Value 

(μg/m3)

Basis Test Method Used 

Data Flag 

(ADL, BDL, 

DDL)

Front Half 

Mass (ng)

Back Half 

Mass (ng)

2.316E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 0.0 21.0

3.595E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 32.6 0.0

5.882E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 0.0 5.3

1.081E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 9.8 0.0

1.875E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 170.0 0.0

4.808E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 436.0 0.0

3.419E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 3.1 0.0

4.963E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 4.5 0.0

7.058E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 56.0 0.8

3.683E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 334.0 0.0

1.015E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 9.2 0.0

4.793E+01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 132.0 43,330.0

1.467E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 13.3 0.0

2.603E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 23.6 0.0

4.900E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 38.1 6.3

3.066E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 27.8 0.0

2.426E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 2.2 0.0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0

3.257E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 32.3 0.0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0

5.142E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 5.1 0.0

1.198E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 118.8 0.0

7.335E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 727.4 0.0

1.815E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 1.8 0.0

2.521E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 2.5 0.0

6.218E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 43.0 18.7

2.753E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 273.0 0.0

9.478E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 9.4 0.0

2.521E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 150.0 100.0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0

1.402E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 13.9 0.0

3.778E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 35.5 2.0

1.523E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 15.1 0.0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0

2.985E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 31.5 0.0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0

1.090E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 11.5 0.0

1.944E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 205.2 0.0

4.184E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 441.6 0.0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0

2.558E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 2.7 0.0

7.201E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 58.0 18.0

1.146E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 1,206.0 3.0
2.691E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 28.4 0.0

6.030E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 503.0 133.3

1.042E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 1.1 0.0

8.339E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 8.8 0.0

3.424E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 14.8 21.3

1.241E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 13.1 0.0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0






Total Mass 

(ng)

Test 

Method 

Comment

s

lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 

7% O2

21.0 2.02E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

32.6 3.14E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

5.3 5.14E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

9.8 9.45E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

170.0 1.64E-07 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

436.0 4.20E-07 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

3.1 2.99E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

4.5 4.34E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

56.8 6.17E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

334.0 3.22E-07 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

9.2 8.87E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

43,462.0 4.19E-05 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

13.3 1.28E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

23.6 2.28E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

44.4 4.28E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

27.8 2.68E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

2.2 2.12E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30

0.0 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

32.3 2.82E-08 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

0.0 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

5.1 4.46E-09 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

118.8 1.04E-07 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

727.4 6.36E-07 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

1.8 1.57E-09 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

2.5 2.19E-09 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

61.7 5.39E-08 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

273.0 2.39E-07 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

9.4 8.22E-09 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

150.1 2.19E-07 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

0.0 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

13.9 1.22E-08 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

37.5 3.28E-08 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

15.1 1.32E-08 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

0.0 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18

0.0 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

31.5 2.60E-08 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

0.0 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

11.5 9.50E-09 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

205.2 1.70E-07 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

441.6 3.65E-07 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

0.0 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

2.7 2.23E-09 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

76.0 6.28E-08 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

1,209.0 9.99E-07 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Calculated Emission Steam 

Output 

(1000 

lb/hr)

Total 

Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/h

r)

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)
28.4 2.35E-08 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

636.3 5.26E-07 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

1.1 9.09E-10 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

8.8 7.27E-09 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

36.1 2.99E-08 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

13.1 1.08E-08 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

0.0 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26






Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measure

ment 

Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160775.43 214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

158643.17 220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(scfm)

Flue Gas 

Temperat

ure (F)

Fuel #1 Fuel #2
160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

160012.75 219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation






Measure

ment 

Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measure

ment 

Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measure

ment 

Method

Fuel #3 Fuel #4







Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Other Supporting Information
Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.






r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu. 

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

r of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.
or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

or of 9780 scf/MMBtu.
EIA Facility Code

Facility 

Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data

Acetophenone 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Benzidine 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Benzoic Acid 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Phenol 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

2-Methylnaphthalene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Acenaphthene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Acenaphthylene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Anthracene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Benzo(a)anthracene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Benzo(a)pyrene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Benzo(e)pyrene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Chrysene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Fluoranthene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Fluorene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Naphthalene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Perylene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Phenanthrene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Pyrene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM

Acetophenone 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Benzidine 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Benzoic Acid 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Phenol 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

2-Methylnaphthalene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Acenaphthene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Acenaphthylene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Anthracene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Benzo(a)anthracene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Benzo(a)pyrene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Benzo(e)pyrene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Chrysene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Fluoranthene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Fluorene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Naphthalene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Compound 

(use drop down to define for as many rows as 

needed)

Run 

Number

Test Start 

Date

Test Start 

Time

Test End 

Date

Test End 

Time
Perylene

2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Phenanthrene2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Pyrene2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Acetophenone3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Benzidine3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Benzoic Acid3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Phenol3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

2-Methylnaphthalene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Acenaphthene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Acenaphthylene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Anthracene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Benzo(a)anthracene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Benzo(a)pyrene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Benzo(b)fluoranthene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Benzo(e)pyrene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Benzo(k)fluoranthene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Chrysene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Fluoranthene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Fluorene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Naphthalene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Perylene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Phenanthrene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM

Pyrene3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM






Footnote

s:

* Front Half Composite contains particulate filter, front half of the filter holder, and probe solvent rinses

** Back Half Composite contains XAD-2 resin tube, back half of the filter holder, and coil condenser solvent rin

*** Condensate Composite contains condensate and Impinger contents and the glassware solvent rinses

Measured 

Value (μg/m3)

Basis 

(Wet or 

Dry)

Test Method Used 

Data Flag 

(ADL, 

BDL, 

DDL)

Front 

Half 

mass* 

(ng)

Back Half 

mass* 

(ng)

Condensate 

Mass*** (ng)

Total 

Composit

e (ng)

1.885E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 1100 3600 0 4700

1.363E+01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 17000 0 17000 34000

2.807E+01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 70000 0 70000

1.363E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 3400 0 3400

1.059E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW ADL -846 Method 8270D4 210 30 264

1.163E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 2.9 0 0 2.9

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 0 0

3.529E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 8.8 0 0 8.8

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 0 0

4.171E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW ADL -846 Method 8270D 4.6 4 1.8 10.4

2.887E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 4 0 3.2 7.2

2.125E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 5.3 0 0 5.3

7.419E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW ADL -846 Method 8270D 10 4.8 3.7 18.5

8.822E-04 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 2.2 0 0 2.2

1.019E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 1.6 0 0.94 2.54

5.935E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW ADL -846 Method 8270D 7.1 4 3.7 14.8

4.491E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 4.8 6.4 0 11.2

7.258E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 4.1 14 0 18.1

4.491E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 8.2 0 3 11.2

2.743E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW ADL -846 Method 8270D 51 550 83 684

2.206E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 3.6 0 1.9 5.5

1.484E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 16 21 0 37

6.015E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 15 0 15

2.403E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 1100 4800 0 5900

6.924E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 17000 0 0 17000

2.647E+01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 65000 0 65000

1.792E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 4400 0 4400

2.036E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D4 26 0 50

1.181E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 2.9 0 0 2.9

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 0 0

2.851E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 7

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 0 0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 0 0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 0 0

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 0 0

9.775E-04 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 2.4 2.4

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 0 0

3.421E-04 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 0.84 0.84

1.100E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 0 2.7 2.7

3.747E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 3.9 5.3 0 9.2

4.480E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 4.1 6.9 0 11

9.368E-04 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 2.3 0 0 2.3

2.281E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 56 0 0 56

Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Test Results
0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0

000

4.888E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 1200 12

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

1.679E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 42000 4200

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

2.638E+01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 660000 66000

1.399E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 35000 3500

2.159E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D5 290 54

1.239E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 3.100 3.1

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

2.438E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 6.100 6.1

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

1.991E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 4.5 0.48 4.98

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

5.756E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 4.8 9.60 14.4

6.196E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 4.5 110 15.5

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

2.438E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 6100 61

0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW BDL -846 Method 8270D 0000

1.439E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 13 230 36

3.957E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW DDL -846 Method 8270D 0 9.90 9.9






be solvent rinses

oil condenser solvent rinses

are solvent rinses

Test Method 

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 

7% O2

1.648E-06 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

1.192E-05 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

2.454E-05 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

1.192E-06 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

9.255E-08 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

1.017E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

0.000E+00 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

3.085E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

0.000E+00 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

3.646E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

2.524E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

1.858E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

6.486E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

7.713E-10 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

8.905E-10 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

5.189E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

3.927E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

6.346E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

3.927E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

2.398E-07 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

1.928E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

1.297E-08 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

5.259E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1

2.084E-06 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

6.004E-06 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

2.296E-05 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

1.554E-06 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

1.77E-08 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

1.02E-09 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

2.47E-09 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

8.48E-10 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

2.97E-10 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

9.54E-10 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

3.25E-09 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

3.88E-09 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

8.12E-10 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

1.98E-08 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow 

Rate 

(scfm)

Calculated Emission 

Steam 

Output 

(1000 

lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)
0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

4.24E-09 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1

1.464E-06 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.000E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

2.300E-05 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

1.220E-06 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

1.88E-08 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

1.08E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

2.13E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

1.74E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

5.02E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

5.40E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

2.13E-08 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

1.25E-08 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1

3.45E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1






Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

214.3 540 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

Flue Gas 

Temperat

ure (F)

Fuel #1 Fuel #2
220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

220.2 541 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation

219.9 536 bituminous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation






Measure

ment 

Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measure

ment 

Method

Fuel 

Input 

Rate

Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measure

ment 

Method

Fuel #3 Fuel #4







Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Other Supporting Information
Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 






 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu
 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

1 5/4/2010 7:50 AM 5/4/2010

2 5/4/2010 11:20 AM 5/4/2010

3 5/4/2010 2:47 PM 5/4/2010

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date
Measured Value 

(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used 

8:50 AM 4.79E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod

12:20 PM 2.93E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod

3:47 PM 5.15E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod

Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results

Test End Time
Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test Method 

Comments

ADL 4.42E-05 510 647 12.4 13.77

BDL 2.71E-06 515 647 11.3 13.84

ADL 4.81E-06 512 653 11.9 13.74

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/mmBtu)

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

5.34 152203.3 235.3 605 bituminous ton/day

5.43 157195.3 230.3 605 bituminous ton/day

5.54 158782.9 216.5 615 bituminous ton/day

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)

Fuel #1 Flue Gas O2

 (%)
Measurement Method Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method Fuel Input Rate

boiler efficiency calculation

boiler efficiency calculation

boiler efficiency calculation

Fuel #2
Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #3 Fuel #4
Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 

Emission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 

Other Supporting Information
 during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

 during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date
Measured Value 

(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Test End Time

Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test Results
Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test Method 

Comments

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/mmBtu)

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

 Test Results

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)

Fuel #1 Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)
Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate

Fuel #2 Fuel #3
Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #4

Other Supporting Information
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date
Measured Value 

(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used 

Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results

Test End Time
Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test Method 

Comments

Test Results

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/mmBtu)

Flue Gas 

Moisture (%)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)

Fuel #1 Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #2 Fuel #3
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #4

Other Supporting Information
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time
Measured NO (ppm) Test End Date Test End Time
Measured NO2

 (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used 

NOX Emission Test Results
Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments (lb/mmBtu)

Total NOX Calculated Emission Rate
ppmdv @ 7% O2

Flue Gas 

Moisture (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input 

(mmBtu/hr)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)

Fuel #1
Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate

Fuel #2 Fuel #3
Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #4

Other Supporting Information
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time
Total Dissolved Solids 

(mg solids/liter)

Total Suspended Solids 

(mg solids/liter)

Test End Date Test End Time
Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Constisuent Emission Test Results
Test Method Comments Fuel Input Rate

Flue Gas 

Temperat

ure (F)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input 

(mmBtu/hr)
Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method Fuel Input Rate

Fuel #1 Fuel #2
Fuel Type Units of 

Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #3 Fuel #4
Other Supporting Information