alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1901.45 Notification of decision and right of judicial review. ( a ) *In general.* The Executive Secretary of the Agency Release Panel shall promptly prepare and communicate the decision of the Panel or Board to the requester. With respect to any decision to deny information or deny amendment, that correspondence shall state the reasons for the decision, identify the officer responsible, and include a notice of the right to judicial review.
( b ) *For amendment requests.* With further respect to any decision to deny an amendment, that correspondence shall also inform the requester of the right to submit within forty-five (45) days a statement of his or her choice which shall be included in the official records of the CIA. In such cases, the applicable record system manager shall clearly note any portion of the official record which is disputed, append the requester's statement, and provide copies of the statement to previous recipients (if any are known) and to any future recipients when and if the disputed information is disseminated in accordance with a routine use.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Isaac J. Gaon,  Chief Financial  Officer with respect to this
certification of Datatec Systems,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

            The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  April
            30, 2002 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with
            the   requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the
            Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and  the  information
            contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
            respects,   the   financial   condition   and  results  of
            operations of the Company.

                                               /s/ Isaac J. Gaon
                                               -----------------
                                               Isaac J. Gaon
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               with respect to this Certification

                                               Dated: October 3, 2002
```
#### § 937.817 Performance standards—underground mining activities.

Part 817 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Underground Mining Activities,* shall apply to any person who conducts underground mining operations.
EXHIBIT 10(y)



FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE

HANDLEMAN COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

(United States)



WHEREAS, Handleman Company (the Company) has established and
maintains the Handleman Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the SERP) for the benefit of selected key executives; and



WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.1 of the SERP, the Company has reserved the right to amend the SERP at any time; and



WHEREAS, the Company is desirous of amending certain SERP actuarial factors
(i.e., the discount rate and mortality table) used in connection with determining Lump Sum Payments.



NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PREMISES, Section 3.3 of the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of May 1, 2005, to read as follows:



3.3 Payment. Subject to Section 3.4 hereof, an
Executives SERP Retirement Benefit shall be paid to him/her, or to his/her Surviving Spouse, at the same time, in the same manner, under the same terms and conditions, and applying the same actuarial factors and reductions, as his/her Accrued
Benefit under the Pension Plan provided, however, that notwithstanding the terms of the Pension Plan, the discount rate and mortality table for Lump Sum Payments will be based on the:



| | (a) | Moodys AA rate plus 25 basis points, to be reset bi-annually as of (1) March 31stfor Lump Sum Payments made between May 1stand October
31stof each Plan Year, and (2) September 30thfor Lump Sum Payments made between November 1stand April 30thof each Plan Year, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | Mortality table referenced in Code Section 417(e), as in effect from time to time.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company hereby adopts this Fourth Amendment to the SERP, effective as of June 8, 2005, this
8thday of June, 2005.



HANDLEMAN COMPANYBy:

/s/ Thomas C. Braum, Jr.Name:

Thomas C. Braum, Jr.Its:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,325,886
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     59,384
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         598,581
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       737,203
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,721,054
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      498,040
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             31,109
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 529,149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    222,627<F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,060,773
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      796
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     10,524
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   776
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 896,409
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,721,054
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      846,535
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            21,841
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     711,851
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     733,692
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        112,843
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              13,898
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 126,741
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        66,993<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,748
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,570
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   57,178
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       268,571
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       56,203
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         114,940
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes $12,019 of Preference Stock
<F2>Includes $9,422 of Monthly Income Preferred Securities Dividend
Requirements.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §795. Fraud, waste, and abuse controls

#### (a) In general

The Administrator shall ensure that—

(1) all programs within the Agency administering Federal disaster relief assistance develop and maintain proper internal management controls to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse;

(2) application databases used by the Agency to collect information on eligible recipients must record disbursements;

(3) such tracking is designed to highlight and identify ineligible applications; and

(4) the databases used to collect information from applications for such assistance must be integrated with disbursements and payment records.

#### (b) Audits and reviews required

The Administrator shall ensure that any database or similar application processing system for Federal disaster relief assistance programs administered by the Agency undergoes a review by the Inspector General of the Agency to determine the existence and implementation of such internal controls required under this section and the amendments made by this section.

(Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §696, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1460.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For the amendments made by this section, referred to in subsec. (b), see Codification note below.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 696 of Pub. L. 109–295. Subsec. (c) of section 696 of Pub. L. 109–295 amended section 5174 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dixie Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel K. Frierson, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/DANIEL K. FRIERSONDaniel K. Frierson, Chief Executive Officer
Date:    July 13, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dixie Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Dixie Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. CRANFORD

No. 396P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 210

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 September 1997.
### §7325. Political activity permitted; employees residing in certain municipalities

The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe regulations permitting employees, without regard to the prohibitions in paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 7323(a) and paragraph (2) of section 7323(b) of this title, to take an active part in political management and political campaigns involving the municipality or other political subdivision in which they reside, to the extent the Office considers it to be in their domestic interest, when—

(1) the municipality or political subdivision is—

(A) the District of Columbia;

(B) in Maryland or Virginia and in the immediate vicinity of the District of Columbia; or

(C) a municipality in which the majority of voters are employed by the Government of the United States; and

(2) the Office determines that because of special or unusual circumstances which exist in the municipality or political subdivision it is in the domestic interest of the employees and individuals to permit that political participation.

(Added Pub. L. 103–94, §2(a), Oct. 6, 1993, 107 Stat. 1004; amended Pub. L. 104–93, title III, §308, Jan. 6, 1996, 109 Stat. 966; Pub. L. 112–230, §3(f), Dec. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1617.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7325, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 526; Pub. L. 96–54, §2(a)(44), Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 384, related to penalties, prior to the general revision of this subchapter by Pub. L. 103–94.

#### Amendments

2012—Par. (1). Pub. L. 112–230 amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows: "the municipality or political subdivision is in Maryland or Virginia and in the immediate vicinity of the District of Columbia, or is a municipality in which the majority of voters are employed by the Government of the United States; and".

1996—Pub. L. 104–93 inserted "and paragraph (2) of section 7323(b)" after "section 7323(a)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2012 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–230 effective 30 days after Dec. 28, 2012, see section 5(a) of Pub. L. 112–230, set out as a note under section 1501 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         4,142,100
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,243,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                     507,000
<INVENTORY>                                      905,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,557,100
<PP&E>                                         1,177,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                   732,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,418,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            707,900
<BONDS>                                                0
<COMMON>                                          17,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                       25,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,667,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,418,300
<SALES>                                        5,892,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,027,500
<CGS>                                          2,286,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,865,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,161,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (983,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,135,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.05
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                   ------------

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
                          JOINT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trident Rowan Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30,2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Emanuel
Arbib, Joint Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                          /s/ Emanuel M. Arbib
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Emanuel M. Arbib
                                          Joint Chief Executive Officer
                                          May 25, 2004
§ 2004.10 Responsibilities of the Director, Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO). The Director, ISOO: ( a ) Implements E.O. 12829, including ensuring that: ( 1 ) The NISP operates as a single, integrated program across the executive branch of the Federal Government (*i.e.,* such that agencies that release classified information to entities adhere to NISP principles);
( 2 ) A responsible CSA oversees each entity's NISP implementation in accordance with § 2004.22;
( 3 ) All agencies that contract for classified work include the Security Requirements clause, 48 CFR 52.204-2, from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), or an equivalent clause, in contracts that require access to classified information;
( 4 ) Those agencies for which the Department of Defense (DoD) serves as the CSA or provides industrial security services have agreements with DoD defining the Secretary of Defense's responsibilities on behalf of their agency;
( 5 ) Each CSA issues directions to entities under their cognizance that are consistent with the NISPOM insider threat guidance;
( 6 ) CSAs share with each other, as lawful and appropriate, relevant information about entity employees that indicates an insider threat; and
( 7 ) CSAs conduct ongoing analysis and adjudication of adverse or relevant information about entity employees that indicates an insider threat.
( b ) Raises an issue to the National Security Council (NSC) for resolution if the EA's NISPOM coordination process cannot reach a consensus on NISPOM security standards (see § 2004.20(d)).
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 13 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit the consideration of a concurrent resolution to provide for a recess of the House 

after July 31 of any year unless the House has approved each regular 

appropriation bill for the next fiscal year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. WITTMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

prohibit the consideration of a concurrent resolution to 

provide for a recess of the House after July 31 of any 

year unless the House has approved each regular appropriation bill for the next fiscal year. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Stay on Sched4 ule (S.O.S.) Resolution’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 13 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING RECESS DURING AUGUST UNTIL AP2 PROVAL OF ALL REGULAR APPROPRIATION 

3 BILLS. 

4 Rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representa5 tives is amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 clause: 

7 ‘‘Concurrent resolution providing for adjournment 

8 during August 

9 ‘‘13. If by July 31 of any calendar year the House 

10 has not passed each of the regular appropriation bills for 

11 the fiscal year which begins on October 1 of that calendar 

12 year, it shall not be in order to consider a concurrent reso13 lution to provide that the House stand adjourned during 

14 any day occurring during August of that calendar year 

15 until the House has passed each such bill. For purposes 

16 of this clause, term ‘regular appropriation bill’ means any 

17 annual appropriation bill which is under the jurisdiction 

18 of a single subcommittee of the Committee on Appropria19 tions of the House of Representatives (as may be provided 

20 under the Rules for the fiscal year involved).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 26.645 Federal agency or agency.

*Federal agency or agency* means any United States executive department, military department, government corporation, government controlled corporation, any other establishment in the executive branch (including the Executive Office of the President), or any independent regulatory agency.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Herbert Aruz, Respondent, v. Warden of the City Prison, Brooklyn Branch, Respondent, and The People of the State of New York, Appellant.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the People appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 6, 1960 after a bearing, as sustained the writ insofar as it pertained to the relator’s confinement by virtue of a warrant for parole violation. Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law, without costs, writ dismissed, and relator remanded to the custody of respondent Warden of the City Prison. The implicit findings of fact are affirmed. On July 28, 1948, after a trial, the relator, then about 16 years of age, was convicted of the crime of robbery in the first degree and was sentenced to he “imprisoned and dealt with according to law and sent to the Reception Center of the Department of Correction at Elmira for classification and confinement pursuant to Article 3-A of the “ Correction Law ”; the length of the term was to be determined by article 13-A of the Correction Law. Relator was confined for more than six years before he was paroled in 1954. In 1960 relator was indicted for the crime of violating section 1897 of the Penal Law and, in default of $5,600 bail, was held in custody by the Warden of the City Prison pending trial. A parole violation warrant was filed against relator. Relator instituted this habeas corpus proceeding. The basic issue was whether the 1948 commitment and sentence involved a maximum term of imprisonment of five years as relator contended, or of 30 years as the People contended (see Penal Law, § 2125). Special Term agreed with relator. It sustained the writ insofar as it involved the warrant for the parole violation. It dismissed the writ insofar as it involved relator’s confinement by virtue of a commitment remanding relator in default of bail fixed by the County Court on the indictment for violation of section 1897 of the Penal Law, and ordered relator remanded until said bail was furnished. It is undisputed that, after the determination by Special Term of the habeas corpus proceeding, relator obtained his release from custody by posting the bail. Under the circumstances, if relator was illegally detained on the parole violation warrant, Special Term did not act improperly by passing on the merits of relator’s imprisonment under said warrant (see, e.g., Civ, Prac. Act, § 1231; *People ex rel. Stokrocki*v. *Fay,*8 A D 2d 984). nevertheless, it is our opinion that, under the sentence referring to the then article 13-A of the Correction Law, relator’s maximum term of imprisonment was 30 years (Correction Law, § 61, subds. 1, 2, as amd. by L. 1946, ch. 206, L, 1947, ch. 198; Correction Law, § 343 of former art. 13-A as it read prior to repeal by L. 1954, ch, 803; *People ex rel. Grady*v. *Jackson,*8 A D 2d 643; *People*v. *Glowacki,*174 Misc. 415, 420-421; 1941 Atty. Gen. 361; 1942 Atty. Gen. 280), Insofar as the dictum in *People ex rel. Stokrocki*v. *Fay (supra)*may be inconsistent herewith, it is overruled. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.
§ 1639.4 Exclusion from Class 2-D. A registrant shall be excluded from Class 2-D when: ( a ) He fails to establish that the theological or divinity school is a recognized school; or
( b ) He fails to establish that the church or religious organization which is sponsoring him is so recognized; or
( c ) He ceases to be a full-time student; or
( d ) He fails to maintain satisfactory academic progress.