alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Walter Garraway, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Warren Garraway, an Infant, Respondent, v. J. Corelli, Doing Business as J. Corelli Homes, Appellant.

In an action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when a block of wood, insecurely fastened to the roof of a house being constructed by the defendant, was caused to become loosened by a gust of wind and to strike the infant plaintiff (then four years of age) on the head while playing in a sand pile on defendant’s property, and by the infant’s father to recover damages for loss of services and for medical expenses, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 23, 1961, after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiffs. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion, Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld and Rabin, JJ,, concur; Ughetta and Brennan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: The defendant was the owner of real property on which he was constructing a one-family home with a pitched roof. Strips of tar paper had been applied to a portion of the roof and, according to the infant plaintiff’s father’s testimony, four or five blocks of wood had been nailed to the tar paper. In the early part of a Saturday afternoon, March 4, I960, the infant plaintiff, then four years of age, was playing on the top of a sand pile 12 feet in from the sidewalk line. Coneededly the infant was a trespasser on defendant’s property. For about one hour prior to the accident there were strong gusts of wind, increasing in velocity. Suddenly a gust of wind lifted the tar paper and dislodged the blocks of wood which had been nailed to it. One of the blocks of wood struck the infant plaintiff, causing him to be injured. To trespassers and mere licensees, such as this infant, the defendant owed a duty only of refraining from any willful or wanton acts directed against them and from the reckless usé or maintenance of inherently dangerous agencies or contrivances likely to inflict injury *(Carbone*v. *Mackchil Reatty Corp.,*296 N. Y. 154; *Mendelowitz*v. *Neisner,*258 N. Y. 181; *Keenan*v. *Lawyers Mtge.*
      *663
      *Co.,*254 App. Div. 348, affd. 280 N. Y. 525). In nailing blocks of wood to hold the tar paper on the roof, defendant acted solely in the furtherance of his business and upon his own property 22 feet from the public highway *(Stinnett*v. *Liberty Aircraft Prods. Corp.,*273 App. Div. 909). There is no evidence in the record of any affirmative wanton act by the defendant; nor, in our opinion, can it be said that the defendant brought about an inherently hazardous situation in disregard of the safety of human life and that the consequences could have been anticipated (cf. *Mayer*v. *Temple Props.,*307 N. Y. 559).
# C_2008301EN.01003502.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/35

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2008 — Tachelet v Commission

(Case T-293/04) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Interlocutory judgment - No need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 301/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Guy Tachelet (Rijmenam, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 2 September 2003 altering the applicant's classification in grade, in so far as it fixes his classification in step on recruitment in step 2 of Grade B4 and did not re-establish the applicant's career grade, and an application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant's complaint and, second, an application for compensation for the damage allegedly caused by that decision.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action.

| 2. | The Commission shall pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission shall pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives

          - [Docket No. 2020R-10W]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Department of Justice.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”) is announcing the withdrawal of a notice and request for comments entitled “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with `Stabilizing Braces',” that was published on December 18, 2020.

# DATES:

The withdrawal is effective December 31, 2020.

# ADDRESSES:

                        This Notice also will be made available on the ATF website (                        *www.atf.gov*).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Andrew Lange, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Enforcement Programs and Services, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice, 99 New York Ave. NE, Mail Stop 6N-518, Washington, DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648-7070 (this is not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Upon further consultation with the Department of Justice and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, ATF is withdrawing, pending further Department of Justice review, the notice and request for comments entitled “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with `Stabilizing Braces',” that was published on December 18, 2020. 85 FR 82516. As explained in the notice, the proposed guidance was not a regulation. The notice informed and invited comment from the industry and public on a proposed guidance prior to issuing a final guidance document.

The withdrawal of the guidance does not change any law, regulation, or other legally binding requirement.

Marvin G. Richardson,

Associate Deputy Director.

[FR Doc. 2020-28930 Filed 12-30-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-FY-P
### §8502. Compensation under State agreement

(a) The Secretary of Labor, on behalf of the United States, may enter into an agreement with a State, or with an agency administering the unemployment compensation law of a State, under which the State agency shall—

(1) pay, as agent of the United States, compensation under this subchapter to Federal employees; and

(2) otherwise cooperate with the Secretary and with other State agencies in paying compensation under this subchapter.

(b) The agreement shall provide that compensation will be paid by the State to a Federal employee in the same amount, on the same terms, and subject to the same conditions as the compensation which would be payable to him under the unemployment compensation law of the State if his Federal service and Federal wages assigned under section 8504 of this title to the State had been included as employment and wages under that State law.

[(c) Repealed. Pub. L. 90–83, §1(86)(B), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 218.]

(d) A determination by a State agency with respect to entitlement to compensation under an agreement is subject to review in the same manner and to the same extent as determinations under the State unemployment compensation law, and only in that manner and to that extent.

(e) Each agreement shall provide the terms and conditions on which it may be amended or terminated.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 586; Pub. L. 90–83, §1(86), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 218.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 42 U.S.C. 1362. | Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1212, §4(a) "Sec. 1502", 68 Stat. 1131. |
| | | Sept. 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–778, §542(b)(1)(A), 74 Stat. 985. |

Statutes at Large

In subsection (a), the words "under this subchapter" are substituted for "on the basis provided in subsection (b) of this section".

In subsection (b), the words "with respect to unemployment after December 31, 1954" are omitted as obsolete.

In subsection (c), the words "with respect to unemployment after December 31, 1960" are omitted as obsolete. In the last sentence, the application to section 8503(b) is omitted and carried into that section.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### 1967 Act

This section amends 5 U.S.C. 8502 to eliminate certain provisions that are now obsolete. The obsolete provisions were based on section 542(b)(1)(A) of the act of September 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 985, that amended section 1502(b) of the Social Security Act effective January 1, 1961, but only in the case of weeks of unemployment beginning before January 1, 1966. Any existing rights are preserved by section 7 of this bill.
EPA Support Form 

Support Form Report Number Mark (X) if anything is CBI

I. ORIGINAL NOTICE SUBMISSION IDENTIFICATION 

Report Number TS 

Number 

Case 

Number 

Original Submission Date 

Original Submission Media Type 

II. ORIGINAL NOTICE SUBMITTER IDENTIFICATION CBI 

Authorized Official 

Name 

Company Name

Mailing Address 

(Number & Street) 

City State Postal Code 

e-mail Telephone 

(include area code) 

III. CURRENT SUPPORT DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION CBI 

Mailing Address 

(Number & Street) 

City State Postal Code 

e-mail Telephone 

(include area code) 

IV. TYPE OF SUPPORT (Check One) 

Letter of Support (Mark the certification statement checkbox below)

Withdrawal Request 

Other Correspondence 

TEST DATA (Health/Eco/Fate) 

Amendment (Changes made to PMN pages 1-13, MSDS or Physical/Chemical 

properties) 

Check if requested by EPA/ contractor 

EPA person/ contractor 

Position

(first) (last)

Name 

Position Company Name

(first) (last)

Submitter Signature

Province Country

All information provided in this Letter of Support is complete and truthful

as of the date of the submission.

Form Approved. O.M.B. No. 2070-0173.

DO46130206532126461

DO462W

Feb 6, 2013

CDX

Imogene Treble

Product Regulatory Leader The Dow Chemical Company

trebleie@dow.com 908-431-5934

1803 Building

Midland MI 48674

Imogene Treble

Product Regulatory Leader The Dow Chemical Company

trebleie@dow.com 908-431-5934

1803 Building

Midland MI 48674

USA

X

SANITIZED SUBMISSION

SUP2013P1
V. TEXT / DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES CBI 

Insert Attachment 

Due to the large file size the test data will be submitted in 4 support files

SANITIZED SUBMISSION

SUP2013P2
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

# Number 

of Pages 

Associated 

Section 

Number 

CBI 

 

 

 Mark (X) this box if the data continues on the next page.

Attachment Name Attachment Filename 

001 14 Day Palatability Public 14 Day Palatability Study

Public.pdf

53

002 28 Day Dietary Tox Study Public 28 Day Dietary Tox Study

Public.pdf

326

003 Acute Eye Irritation Public AC Eye Irritation Public.pdf 50

004 Ames Assay Public Ames Assay Public.pdf 59

SANITIZED SUBMISSION

SUP2013P3
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 001

Attachment Name

14 Day Palatability Public

Associated PMN Section Number

N/A

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

DO46130206532126461

SANITIZED SUBMISSION
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 002

Attachment Name

28 Day Dietary Tox Study Public

Associated PMN Section Number

N/A

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

DO46130206532126461

SANITIZED SUBMISSION
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 003

Attachment Name

Acute Eye Irritation Public

Associated PMN Section Number

N/A

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

DO46130206532126461

SANITIZED SUBMISSION
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 004

Attachment Name

Ames Assay Public

Associated PMN Section Number

N/A

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

DO46130206532126461

SANITIZED SUBMISSION
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,757,513
<SECURITIES>                                   797,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,558,962
<PP&E>                                         302,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                 235,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,652,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,504
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,632,998
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,997,356)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,652,146
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,092,386
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               152,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,939,442
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,939,442
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,939,442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .63
        


</TABLE>
Appeal No. 76-107.

#### Augusto Ambrosino *v.*Joseph Bevilacqua *et al.*

*Giovanni Folcarelli,*for petitioner.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for respondents.

This case is assigned to the calendar for May 3, 1977, 9:30 a.m., for oral argument. The petitioner will be expected to *show cause*in what manner the trial justice abused his discretion in denying the petition for mandamus, in view of the trial justice’s finding of fact that petitioner had been directed, in writing, to return to his former position, and in view of the trial justice’s finding of fact that petitioner’s failure to return was attributable to his own lack of diligence.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11



                NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


                Statement re computation of per share earnings

                Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                              For the Year                   
                                             Ended December 31              
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  1998             1997            1996
                                  ----             ----            ----
<S>                             <C>              <C>              <C> 

Net Earnings                    $ 14,518         $ 22,185         $ 11,730
                                ========         ========         ========

Average common shares
   outstanding                    15,005           15,019           15,040
                                ========         ========         ========

Basic and diluted earnings
   per share                    $    .97         $   1.48         $    .78
                                ========         ========         ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.36

                             Cabletron Systems, Inc.

                                 August 3, 2001

Eric Jaeger
51 Evans Road
Madbury, VT  03820

Eric:

We have agreed that the terms below will govern your relationship with Cabletron
going forward. If these terms are acceptable to you, please sign and return a
copy of this letter to me, at which point it will become a binding agreement
between you and Cabletron.

     1.   CURRENT SALARY. You will be paid your current base salary through
          Sept. 2, 2001.

     2.   TRANSFORMATION BONUS. You will be paid a transformation bonus of
          $100,000 on Aug. 3, 2001. Also on Aug. 3, 2001, you will receive your
          normal quarterly bonus of $48,000 for Q2 on Sept. 9.

     3.   ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. We agree to pay you additional compensation
          equal to one year salary plus bonus. One-half of the Additional
          Compensation shall be paid on Aug. 3. The other half of the Additional
          Compensation will be paid to you on Jan 2. 2002; this amount shall be
          placed in an escrow account to be released on Jan. 2 unless you have
          materially breached the confidentiality provision set forth below. At
          such time as you cease to be an employee of the Company, you will be
          paid a lump sum based upon your unused vacation time at your current
          base salary.

     4.   CONFIDENTIALITY. You agree not to disclose any material confidential
          information of the Company or its subsidiaries to any third parties
          under circumstances that one would reasonably expect to cause material
          harm to the Company or its subsidiaries.

     5.   STOCK OPTIONS. Your Cabletron stock options will be treated the same
          as other employees, that is, the vesting on you Cabletron stock
          options will be accelerated through Feb. 28, 2002 and you will receive
          Riverstone rainbow options using the same ratio used with respect to
          Cabletron stockholders. With respect to your Aprisma, Enterasys, and
          Riverstone stock options, the remaining restrictions that prevent the
          transfer of the shares issued on exercise of the options will be
          lifted as of Aug. 6. This will not affect the exercisability of the
          stock options.

     6.   EXISTING LOAN. For purposes of your existing loan from Cabletron, as
          of August 6, 2001 you will be deemed to satisfy the conditions for
          complete forgiveness of the loan. You will not be required to repay
          any portion of the loan as a result of sales of Cabletron, Riverstone
          or Enterasys shares either prior to or after the date of this letter
          agreement.



                                                Cabletron Systems, Inc.

          /s/ Eric Jaeger                       By: /s/ Piyush Patel
          --------------------------                ---------------------------
          Eric Jaeger                               Piyush Patel
                                                    CEO and President
**Exhibit32(a)**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hickory Tech Corporation onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John W. Finke, ChiefExecutive Officer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofHickoryTech.

 
| /s/ John W. Finke                      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| John W. Finke                          |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| March 14, 2007                         |

 

----
### §677c. Cyber Response and Recovery Fund

#### (a) In general

There is established a Cyber Response and Recovery Fund, which shall be available for—

(1) the coordination of activities described in section 677b(b) of this title;

(2) response and recovery support for the specific significant incident associated with a declaration to Federal, State, local, and Tribal, entities and public and private entities on a reimbursable or non-reimbursable basis, including through asset response activities and technical assistance, such as—

(A) vulnerability assessments and mitigation;

(B) technical incident mitigation;

(C) malware analysis;

(D) analytic support;

(E) threat detection and hunting; and

(F) network protections;

(3) as the Director determines appropriate, grants for, or cooperative agreements with, Federal, State, local, and Tribal public and private entities to respond to, and recover from, the specific significant incident associated with a declaration, such as—

(A) hardware or software to replace, update, improve, harden, or enhance the functionality of existing hardware, software, or systems; and

(B) technical contract personnel support; and

(4) advance actions taken by the Secretary under section 677b(f)(1)(B) of this title.

#### (b) Deposits and expenditures

#### (1) In general

Amounts shall be deposited into the Fund from—

(A) appropriations to the Fund for activities of the Fund; and

(B) reimbursement from Federal agencies for the activities described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subsection (a), which shall only be from amounts made available in advance in appropriations Acts for such reimbursement.

#### (2) Expenditures

Any expenditure from the Fund for the purposes of this part shall be made from amounts available in the Fund from a deposit described in paragraph (1), and amounts available in the Fund shall be in addition to any other appropriations available to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency for such purposes.

#### (c) Supplement not supplant

Amounts in the Fund shall be used to supplement, not supplant, other Federal, State, local, or Tribal funding for activities in response to a declaration.

#### (d) Reporting

The Secretary shall require an entity that receives amounts from the Fund to submit a report to the Secretary that details the specific use of the amounts.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XXII, §2234, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. G, title VI, §70602(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1270.)
# Appendix 1,2,3

# Appendix 4,5,6

# Appendix 7

# Sheet8

# Sheet9

# Sheet10

# Sheet11

# Sheet12

# Sheet13

# Sheet14