# TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR 2002 MANE-VU

SIP MODELING INVENTORIES, VERSION 3

Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 3622 Lyckan Parkway, Suite 2005 Durham, NC 27707

November 20, 2006

for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU)

## [This page intentionally left blank.]

## iii CONTENTS

TABLES .............................................

................................................... ........................................ vi

FIGURES............................................

................................................... ......................................viii

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .........................

................................................... .......... ix

CHAPTER I – INTRODUCTION...........................

................................................... .................... 1 A. What is the purpose of this TSD? ................

................................................... .................... 1 B. What are Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the 2002 MANE-V U Inventory?.................................... 2 C. How is this TSD organized? ......................

................................................... ...................... 3

CHAPTER II – POINT SOURCES.........................

................................................... .................... 4 A. General Methods for all State and Local Agencies

................................................... ......... 4

1. What Data Sources Were Used? ....................

................................................... ............ 4 2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? ....

................................................... . 5 3. Version 3 Emissions Summary.....................

................................................... ........... 18 B. State-Specific Methods ..........................

................................................... ........................ 20

1. Connecticut .....................................

................................................... ......................... 20

2. Delaware ........................................

................................................... .......................... 21

3. District of Columbia ............................

................................................... .................... 21

4. Maine ...........................................

................................................... ............................ 22 5. Maryland........................................

................................................... .......................... 22

6. Massachusetts ...................................

................................................... ....................... 23 7. New Hampshire ...................................

................................................... .................... 23 8. New Jersey......................................

................................................... ......................... 24

9. New York........................................

................................................... ......................... 24 10. Pennsylvania (State, Excluding Allegheny and Ph iladelphia Counties) .................... 25 11. Pennsylvania (Allegheny County, FIPS code 42003 )................................................. 2 7 12. Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County, FIPS code 42 101) ............................................. 28

13. Rhode Island ...................................

................................................... ......................... 28

14. Vermont ........................................

................................................... ........................... 30

C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons? ............................................... ... 30

CHAPTER III – AREA SOURCES .........................

................................................... ................. 32

A. General Methods for all States..................

................................................... ..................... 32

1. What Data Sources Were Used? ....................

................................................... .......... 32 2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? .... .................................................. 3 4

3. Version 3 Revisions .............................

................................................... .................... 53 4. Version 3 Emissions Summary.....................

................................................... ........... 57 B. State-Specific Methods .........................

................................................... ........................... 58

1. Connecticut .....................................

................................................... ......................... 58

2. Delaware ........................................

................................................... .......................... 59

3. District of Columbia ............................

................................................... .................... 60

4. Maine ...........................................

................................................... ............................ 60 5. Maryland........................................

................................................... .......................... 61

6. Massachusetts ...................................

................................................... ....................... 62 7. New Hampshire ...................................

................................................... .................... 63 8. New Jersey......................................

................................................... ......................... 65

9. New York........................................

................................................... ......................... 65 10. Pennsylvania ...................................

................................................... ......................... 70

11. Rhode Island ...................................

................................................... ......................... 71

## iv

12. Vermont ........................................

................................................... ........................... 72

C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons? ............................................... ... 73

CHAPTER IV – NONROAD SOURCES .......................

................................................... .......... 75

A. General Methods for all States..................

................................................... ..................... 75

1. What Data Sources Were Used? ....................

................................................... .......... 75 2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? .... .................................................. 7 9

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries....................

................................................... ........... 82 B. State-Specific Methods ..........................

................................................... ........................ 84

1. Connecticut .....................................

................................................... ......................... 84

2. Delaware ........................................

................................................... .......................... 84

3. District of Columbia ............................

................................................... .................... 85

4. Maine ...........................................

................................................... ............................ 86 5. Maryland........................................

................................................... .......................... 87

6. Massachusetts ...................................

................................................... ....................... 88 7. New Hampshire ...................................

................................................... .................... 89 8. New Jersey......................................

................................................... ......................... 89

9. New York........................................

................................................... ......................... 90 10. Pennsylvania ...................................

................................................... ......................... 91

11. Rhode Island ...................................

................................................... ......................... 92

12. Vermont ........................................

................................................... ........................... 93

CHAPTER V – ONROAD SOURCES .........................

................................................... ............ 94

A. General Methods for All States..................

................................................... .................... 94

1. Data Sources ....................................

................................................... ........................ 94 2. What Quality Assurance Steps were Performed? ....

................................................... 95

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries....................

................................................... ........... 96 B. State-Specific Methods .........................

................................................... ........................... 97

1. Connecticut .....................................

................................................... ......................... 97

2. Delaware ........................................

................................................... .......................... 99

3. District of Columbia ............................

................................................... .................. 100

4. Maine ...........................................

................................................... .......................... 102 5. Maryland........................................

................................................... ........................ 103

6. Massachusetts ...................................

................................................... ..................... 105 7. New Hampshire ...................................

................................................... .................. 106 8. New Jersey......................................

................................................... ....................... 108

9. New York........................................

................................................... ....................... 110 10. Pennsylvania ...................................

................................................... ....................... 111

11. Rhode Island ...................................

................................................... ....................... 113

12. Vermont ........................................

................................................... ......................... 114

CHAPTER VI – BIOGENIC SOURCES......................

................................................... .......... 117

A. General Methods for all States..................

................................................... ................... 117

1. What Data Sources Were Used? ....................

................................................... ........ 117 2. Version 3 Emissions Summary.....................

................................................... ......... 118 B. State-Specific Methods ..........................

................................................... ...................... 118 CHAPTER VII. TEMPORAL, SPECIATION, AND SPATIAL ALLO CATION PROFILES AND PREPARATION OF SMOKE (IDA) AND RPO DATA EXCHANG E PROTOCOL (NIF 3.0) FORMATS .........................

................................................... ... 119 A. Temporal Profiles...............................

................................................... .......................... 119

1. Point and Area Sources..........................

................................................... ................ 119

## v

2. Nonroad Sources.................................

................................................... ................... 120

3. Onroad Sources..................................

................................................... .................... 120 B. Speciation Profiles .............................

................................................... .......................... 121

1. Point and Area Sources..........................

................................................... ................ 121

2. Nonroad Sources.................................

................................................... ................... 121

3. Onroad Sources..................................

................................................... .................... 121 C. Spatial Allocation Profiles .....................

................................................... ...................... 122 D. Preparation of SMOKE (IDA) and RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0) Formats .. 122

CHAPTER VIII. METHODS FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE MANE -VU REGION ..... 155

CHAPTER IX. REFERENCES .............................

................................................... ........... 157

APPENDIX A - POINT SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: DA TA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT................

................................................... .A-1

APPENDIX B - AREA SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: DAT A SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT................

................................................... .B-1

APPENDIX C - NONROAD SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: FINAL COUNTY, MONTHLY NATIONAL MOBILE INVENTORY MODEL (NMIM) INPU TS TEMPORAL

PROFILES FOR POINT AND AREA SOURCES................

................................................... .C-1

## vi

TABLES

Table II-1. Description of the Field Names and Des criptions for the SCC Control Device

Ratios Table .......................................

................................................... ............................ 14

Table II-2. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Point Source Em issions by State.................................. 1 9 Table II-3. Connecticut 2002 Point, Version 3: Uni que List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 20 Table II-4. Delaware 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types..............................................

................................................... ................................ 21 Table II-5. District of Columbia 2002 Point, Versi on 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type ......................................

................................................... ......................... 21 Table II-6. Maine 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique Li st of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types..............................................

................................................... ................................ 22 Table II-7. Maryland 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types..............................................

................................................... ................................ 22 Table II-8. Massachusetts 2002 Point, Version 3: U nique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 23 Table II-9. New Hampshire 2002 Point, Version 3: U nique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 23 Table II-10. New Jersey 2002 Point, Version 3: Uni que List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 24 Table II-11. New York 2002 Point, Version 3: Uniqu e List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type ......................................

................................................... ......................... 25 Table II-12. Pennsylvania 2002 Point, Version 3: U nique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 26 Table II-13. Pennsylvania - Allegheny County 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types .......................

................................................... ............... 27 Table II-14. Pennsylvania - Philadelphia County 20 02 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.................

................................................... ............ 28 Table II-15. Rhode Island 2002 Point, Version 3: U nique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 30 Table II-16. Vermont 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types..............................................

................................................... ................................ 30 Table III-1. Summary of MANE-VU-Sponsored Inventor ies Included in Version 1 of the Area Source Consolidated Emissions Inventory ............

................................................... ........ 41 Table III-2. Area Source Industrial, Commercial/In stitutional, and Residential Fossil Fuel

Combustion Uncontrolled Emission Factors for PM10-P RI/FIL, PM25-PRI/FIL, and

PM-CON.............................................

................................................... ........................... 44

Table III-3. SCCs for which PM25-PRI Emissions wer e Estimated by Applying a Ratio to the PM10-PRI Emissions in the State inventory ..........

................................................... ....... 49

Table III-4. Revisions to PM25-PRI and PM25-FIL Em issions for Paved and Unpaved Roads

and Construction ...................................

................................................... ......................... 56

Table III-5. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Area Source Em issions by State ................................. 57 Table III-6. Connecticut 2002 Area, Version 3: Uni que List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 58 Table III-7. Delaware 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types..............................................

................................................... ................................ 59

## vii

Table III-8. District of Columbia 2002 Area, Versi on 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types .................................

................................................... ...................... 60 Table III-9. Maine 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique Li st of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types..............................................

................................................... ................................ 60 Table III-10. Maryland 2002 Area, Version 3: Uniqu e List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 61 Table III-11. Massachusetts 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 62 Table III-12. New Hampshire 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 64 Table III-13. New Jersey 2002 Area, Version 3: Uni que List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 65 Table III-14. New York 2002 Area, Version 3: Uniqu e List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 66 Table III-15. Summary of New York's Revisions to V ersion 3 of MANE-VU's Area Source Inventory..........................................

................................................... .............................. 68 Table III-16. Pennsylvania 2002 Area, Version 3: U nique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 70 Table III-17. Rhode Island 2002 Area, Version 3: U nique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.....................................

................................................... ......................... 71 Table III-18. Vermont 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types..............................................

................................................... ................................ 72 Table IV-1. List of Unique Aircraft, Commercial Mar ine, and Locomotive SCCs Reported by States in MANE-VU Inventory ........................

................................................... ............. 76 Table IV-2. Summary of Basis for 2002 MANE-VU Airc raft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive Inventory...............................

................................................... ..................... 77 Table IV-3. Data Source Code Descriptions.........

................................................... .................... 82

Table IV-4. Annual 2002 Nonroad Sector Emissions b y MANE-VU State................................ 82

Table IV-5. Annual 2002 NONROAD2005 Model Emission s by MANE-VU State ................. 83 Table IV-6. Annual 2002 Aircraft, Commercial Marin e, and Locomotive Emissions by

MANE-VU State......................................

................................................... ...................... 83

Table IV-7. Delaware NONROAD External Data Files...

................................................... ......... 85 Table IV-8. Maryland NONROAD External Data Files ..

................................................... ........ 87 Table V-1. Annual 2002 Onroad Sector Emissions by MANE-VU State................................... 97 Table V-2. Connecticut Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files.............................................. ....... 98 Table V-3. Delaware Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Fil es................................................. ...... 100

Table V-4. District of Columbia Onroad Data in SMO KE Input Files ..................................... 101 Table V-5. Maine Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files .

................................................... ........ 102 Table V-6. Maryland Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Fil es................................................. ...... 104 Table V-7. Massachusetts Onroad Data in SMOKE Inpu t Files ............................................ ... 105 Table V-8. New Hampshire Onroad Data in SMOKE Inpu t Files ............................................ 107 Table V-9. New Jersey Onroad Data in SMOKE Input F iles............................................... ..... 108 Table V-10. New York Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Fi les ................................................ ... 110 Table V-11. Pennsylvania Onroad Data in SMOKE Inpu t Files............................................ ... 112 Table V-12. Rhode Island Onroad Data in SMOKE Inpu t Files ............................................ ... 113 Table V-13. Vermont Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Fil es ................................................. ..... 115 Table VI-1. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Biogenic Source Emissions by State ........................ 118

## viii

Table VII-1. Profiles, Cross-references, and Docum entation for Model Inputs for Version 3 of 2002 MANE-VU Inventory .............................

................................................... ............ 123 Table VII-2. Point Source Temporal Cross-reference Additions ......................................... ..... 126

Table VII-3. Unknown SCCs in the MANE-VU Point Sour ce Inventory.................................. 130 Table VII-4. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference Updates ............................................ .... 131 Table VII-5. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference Additions.......................................... .... 136 Table VII-6. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference and Profile Additions for the MANE-VU Inventory..........................................

................................................... ............................ 141 Table VII-7. Point Source Speciation Profiles Adde d to Speciation Cross-reference File for CBIV with PM Mechanism...............................

................................................... ................ 151 Table VII-8. Point Source SCCs Lacking Speciation Profile Assignments for CB-IV with PM

Mechanism..........................................

................................................... ......................... 152 Table VII-9. Summary of Version 3 Mass Emissions a nd SMOKE Input Files ....................... 153 Table VII-10. Unique List of Start Date, End Date , and Emission Type Combinations for Daily

Emissions in the MANE-VU 2002 Point and Area Source Inventories, Version 3 ....... 154 Table VIII-1. Description of Non-MANE-VU Region In ventory Data Used for MANE-VU BaseB Modeling.....................................

................................................... ...................... 156 Table C-1. MANE-VU County, Monthly NMIM/NONROAD In puts...................................... C-2

FIGURES

Figure 1. MANE-VU 12-Kilometer CMAQ Modeling Domai n .................................................. . 2 Figure VIII-1. MANE-VU 12-Kilometer CMAQ Modeling D omain........................................ 155

## ix

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ATP Anaerobic Thermal Processor BEIS Biogenic Emissions Inventory System

CAA Clean Air Act

CAIR Clean Air Interstate Rule

CAMD Clean Air Markets Division CAP criteria air pollutant CE Control Equipment (NIF 3.0) table CEM Continuous Emissions Monitoring CENRAP Central Regional Air Planning Organization CERR Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule CMU Carnegie Mellon University CNG compressed natural gas

CO carbon monoxide

CO 2 

## carbon dioxide

EF emission factor EFIG Emission Factors and Inventory Group EGU electricity generating unit EI inventory EM Emission (NIF 3.0) table EP Emission Process (NIF 3.0) table EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ERP Emission Release Point (NIF 3.0) table ETBE ethyl tertiary butyl ether

ETOH ethanol ETS Emission Tracking System EU Emission Unit (NIF 3.0) table FIPS Federal Information Processing Standard

FIRE Factor Information and REtrieval Factor GIS geographic information system GSE ground support equipment HAP hazardous air pollutant HC hydrocarbon HPMS Highway Performance Monitoring System

ID identification IDA Inventory Data Analyzer format I/M inspection and maintenance

km kilometer

LAI leaf area indices

LEV low emission vehicle LPG liquified petroleum gas MACT maximum achievable control technology MANE-VU Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union MARAMA Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Associ ation MTBE methyl tertiary butyl ether NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard NAICS North American Industrial Classification Sys tem

## x

NEI National Emissions Inventory

NH 3 

## ammonia NIF NEI Input Format NMIM National Mobile Inventory Model

NO nitrous oxide

NO

x 

## oxides of nitrogen NYSDEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ORIS Office of Regulatory Information Systems OTC Ozone Transport Commission PAR photosynthetic active radiation PE Emission Period (NIF 3.0) table Pechan E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. PFC portable fuel container PM particulate matter

PM-CON condensible PM

PM 10 

## particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter le ss than or equal to a

nominal 10 micrometers

PM10-FIL filterable PM 10 

## PM10-PRI primary PM 10 

## PM 2.5 

## particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter l ess than or equal to a

nominal 2.5 micrometers

PM25-FIL filterable PM 2.5 

## PM25-PRI primary PM 2.5 

## POTWs public owned treatment works ppm parts per million psi pounds per square inch QA quality assurance QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan RPO Regional Planning Organization RVP Reid vapor pressure

SCC Source Classification Code SPDPRO speed profile SPDREF speed cross reference SI Site (NIF 3.0) table

SIC Standard Industrial Classification SIP State Implementation Plan

S/L State and Local SMOKE Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions

SO 2 

## sulfur dioxide TAME tertiary amyl methyl ether TR Transmittal (NIF 3.0) table TSD technical support document

U.S. United States VISTAS Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Ass ociation of the Southeast

VMT vehicle miles traveled VOC volatile organic compound WRAP Western Regional Air Partnership

## 1

CHAPTER I – INTRODUCTION

A. What is the purpose of this TSD?

This technical support document (TSD) explains the data sources, methods, and results for preparing Version 3 of the 2002 base year criteria air pollutant (CAP) and ammonia (NH 3 

## ) emissions inventories for point, area, onroad, nonr oad, and biogenic sources for the MidAtlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) Regio nal Planning Organization (RPO). The MANE-VU region includes Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Local air planning agencies include Phila delphia and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The region also includes the Penobsc ot Tribe of Maine Indian Nation (Tribal code 018) and the St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians of Ne w York (Tribal code 007). However, these tribal authorities did not provide any data f or the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. MANE-VU will use these inventories to support air quality m odeling, State Implementation Plan (SIP) development, and implementation activities for the regional haze rule and fine particulate matter (PM) and ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standar ds (NAAQS).

The inventories and supporting data prepared includ e the following:

(1) Comprehensive, county-level, mass emissions and modeling inventories for of 2002

emissions for CAPs and NH 3 

## for the State and Local (S/L) agencies included in the MANE-VU region; (2) The temporal, speciation, and spatial allocatio n profiles for the MANE-VU region inventories; (3) Inventories for wildfires, prescribed burning, and agricultural field burning for the southeastern provinces of Canada; and (4) Inventories for other RPOs, Canada, and Mexico.

The mass emissions inventory files were prepared in the National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Input Format Version 3.0 (NIF 3.0). The modeling i nventory files were prepared in Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions/Inventory Data Ana lyzer (SMOKE/IDA) format. Ancillary files (holding spatial, temporal, and speciation pr ofile data) were prepared in SMOKE/IDA compatible format. Figure 1 shows the Models-3 Com munity Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System (CMAQ) modeling domain for the MANE-VU regio n.

The inventories include annual emissions for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

## ), oxides of nitrogen (NO

x 

## ), volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide ( CO), NH 3 

## , and particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nomina l 10 and 2.5 micrometers (i.e., primary PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## ). The inventories included summer day, winter day , and average day emissions. However, not all agencies included daily emissions in their inventories, and, for the agencies that did, the temporal basis for the daily emissions var ied between agencies. The temporal profiles prepared for this project will be used to calculate daily emissions when not available in the inventory files.

## 2 Figure 1. MANE-VU 12-Kilometer CMAQ Modeling Domai n

B. What are Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the 2002 MANE-V U Inventory?

Work on Version 1 of the 2002 MANE-VU inventory beg an in April 2004. The consolidated inventory for point, area, onroad, and nonroad sour ces was prepared by starting with the inventories that S/L agencies submitted to the Unit ed States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from May through July of 2004 as a req uirement of the Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR). The EPA’s format and conten t quality assurance (QA) programs (and other QA checks not included in EPA’s QA software) were run on each inventory to identify format and/or data content issues (EPA, 2004a). E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. (Pechan) worked with the MANE-VU S/L agencies and the staff of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA) to resolve QA issue s and augment the inventories to fill data gaps in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) prepared for this project (MANE-VU, 2004a). MARAMA is the MANE-VU or ganization’s employees, whereas

## 3

MANE-VU is the member S/L agencies plus MARAMA empl oyees. MARAMA is one of three RPOs (in addition to Ozone Transport Commission (OT C) and North East States for Coordinated Air Use Management) supporting the MANE-VU effort.

A draft of the point and area source inventories an d summary files were provided for stakeholder review during August 2004. Stakeholder comments we re reviewed by the S/L agencies and revisions to the inventory files were made to the f iles to incorporate stakeholder comments as approved by each S/L agency. The inventories were finalized during December 2004 and the SMOKE input files were prepared and reviewed by the modelers during December 2004 and early January 2005. The final inventory and SMOKE input files were finalized during January

2005.

Work on Version 2 (covering the period from April t hrough September 2005) involved incorporating revisions requested by some S/L agenc ies on the point, area, and onroad inventories. Work on Version 3 (covering the perio d from December 2005 through April 2006) included additional revisions to the point, area, a nd onroad inventories as requested by some states. Thus, the Version 3 inventory for point, a rea, and onroad sources were built upon Versions 1 and 2. This work also included developm ent of the biogenics inventory. Version 3 of the nonroad inventory was completely redone due to changes that EPA made to the

NONROAD2005 model.

C. How is this TSD organized?

Chapters II through V of this TSD present the gener al and State-specific methods and data sources used to develop Version 3 of MANE-VU’s 2002 inventory for point, area, nonroad, and onroad sources. Chapter VI presents the methods, d ata sources, and model used to develop the biogenics inventory. Chapter VII documents the tem poral allocation, speciation, and spatial allocation modeling input files used for Version 3 of MANE-VU’s 2002 inventory for all sectors. Chapter VIII describes the non-MANE-VU region inven tory data used for MANE-VU BaseB Modeling. References for the TSD are provided in C hapter IX. Appendices A and B provide the QA Summary Report files prepared during development of the State-specific inventories for point and area sources, respectively. Appendices A and B also provide tables that identify for each S/L agency, the Version 3 data sources, emissi on type period, pollutant, and the number of counties by source classification code (SCC). For the nonroad inventory, Appendix C provides the final county, monthly National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) inputs provided or confirmed by the States for Reid vapor pressure (RV P), weight percent oxygen, and gasoline

sulfur.

## 4

CHAPTER II

–

POINT SOURCES

A. General Methods for all State and Local Agencies

1. What Data Sources Were Used?

Version 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU point source inventor y is based primarily on Version 1 with some state-specific revisions incorporated into Ver sions 2 and 3. Version 1 was developed using the inventories that S/L agencies submitted to EPA from May through July of 2004 as a requirement of the CERR. All 12 State agencies sub mitted point source inventories to EPA. In addition, Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties in Pe nnsylvania each submitted their own point source inventories to EPA. The EPA performed some limited QA review of the S/L inventories to identify format, referential integrity, and dupl icate record issues. The EPA revised the

inventories to address these issues and made the fi les available to the S/L agencies on August 6, 2004. These inventory files were used as the start ing point for Version 1 of the MANE-VU inventory. These inventory files were obtained fro m EPA, consolidated into a single data set, subjected to extensive QA review, revised (as appro ved by the MANE-VU S/L agencies) to address QA issues and to fill data gaps identified while preparing Version 1. Subsequently, the following agencies provided revisions to their poin t source inventories:

• Version 2 – Connecticut, Delaware, and Maryland

• Version 3 – Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Isla nd

The revisions that these states provided for Versio ns 2 and 3 are discussed in the “State-Specific Methods” section of this chapter.

In order to track the origin of data, the temporal period of emissions, and to facilitate generation of emission summaries, the following NIF plus field s were added to the Transmittal (TR), Site (SI), Emission Unit (EU), Emission Release Point (E R), Emission Process (EP), Emission Period (PE), Emission (EM), and Control Equipment (CE) tab les:

• Data Source Codes:

Code Description S State agency-supplied data. L Local agency-supplied data to incorporate S/L com ments for individual

records.

P NH 3 

## emissions from MANE-VU inventory for cement kilns. AUG-A PM Augmentation: ad-hoc change. AUG-C PM Augmentation: standard augmentation metho d. AUG-O PM Augmentation: set PMxx-FIL = PMxx-PRI for SCCs starting with 10 (external fuel combustion) and 20 (internal fuel combustion). Note: emission factors and particle-size data for estimat ing condensible emissions for fuel combustion SCCs starting with 30 were not available; therefore, condensible emissions were not estimated for these processes

## 5 if an agency provided filterable and not primary em issions for these processes. In other words, the primary emissions w ere assumed to equal

the filterable emissions. AUG-Z PM Augmentation: automated fill-in of zero v alues where all PM for a

particular process is zero.

• Revision Date: This field indicates the month and year during which the last revision

was made to a record.

• State Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS ): This field indicates the state

FIPS code of the submittal.

• County FIPS: This field indicates the county FIPS code of the submittal.

The following NIF plus fields were added to the EM table:

• Emission Ton Value: This field indicates the value s of the emissions in tons. This field was used to prepare summaries of emissions on a consistent EU basis.

• Emission Type Period: This field indicates the per iod of the Emission Type – either ANNUAL or NONANNUAL. This field was used to prepar e summaries of annual

emissions.

• CAP_HAP: This field identifies records for CAP ver sus records for hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). For the MANE-VU inventory, the flag is CAP for all records.

• Year: This field indicates the year of the data; f or this inventory, it is 2002.

Note that the QAPP for Version 1 includes more data source codes than were used in Version 3 of the point source inventory. The data source cod es listed above are the codes used in Version 3. The exception is for Rhode Island, who requested that their Version 2 inventory be replaced with its inventory included in the final 2 002 NEI prepared by EPA. Thus, for Rhode Island, it was agreed to maintain the data source c odes used in the NEI in Version 3 of the MANE-VU inventory. The data source codes for Rhode Island’s point source inventory are explained under the state-specific section for Rhod e Island.

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed?

A QAPP was prepared and approved by MANE-VU/MARAMA and the EPA Regional Office prior to initiating work on Version 1 of the invent ory (MANE-VU, 2004a). This QAPP was followed during preparation of all three versions o f the inventory. This section provides an overview of the QA checks completed on each version of the inventory. The QA process for each S/L inventory involved the following steps:

• Conduct QA checks on each S/L inventory;

• Prepare a QA Summary Report for submittal to the ag ency for review;

## 6

• Revise the inventory to resolve QA issues as direct ed by the agency;

• Repeat the QA checks on the revised inventory to ve rify that the corrections were completed;

• Perform augmentation to correct for missing data; a nd

• Repeat the QA checks to verify that the augmentatio n was completed correctly.

a. QA checks for S/L agency inventories

The following discusses the QA diagnoses that were run on the consolidated point source inventory data set. For each S/L agency, a “QA Sum mary Report” was prepared for each QA

check in an Excel Workbook file. The results of ea ch QA check was summarized in a separate spreadsheet and submitted to the S/L agency for rev iew and resolution. The agencies provided

corrections to the data in the Excel files or via e -mail and the inventory was updated with the

corrections.

i. Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM) Analysis

The goal of this analysis was to compare annual NO

x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions that were measured with CEM systems and reported to EPA to the annual NO

x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions reported in the S/L inventories. Facilities report hourly CEM data to EPA for units that are subject to CEM reporting requirements of the NO

x 

## SIP Call rule and Title IV of the Clean Air Act (C AA). Thus, hourly CEM emissions were summed to the annual leve l and compared to the annual emissions in the S/L inventories. If the S/L agencies agreed , the CEM hourly emissions would be used to support air quality modeling to accurately reflect the temporal distribution of emissions from CEM units during 2002. Since some of the states re quire facilities to certify the emissions they report for inclusion in the inventory, the agencies needed proof that the emissions in the CEM inventory compared well with the emissions in the S /L inventory.

The 2002 CEM inventory containing hourly NO

x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions and heat input data were

downloaded from the EPA/Clean Air Markets Division’ s (CAMD) web site (www.epa.gov/airmarkets) on July 8, 2004 (CAMD, 200 4). The data were provided by quarter and state resulting in 48 separate files for the 12 states in the MANE-VU region. For each state, the hourly emissions were summed to the annual leve l by facility and EU.

The first stage in the CEM analysis involved prepar ing a crosswalk file to match facilities and units in the CEM inventory to facilities and units in the S/L inventories. In the CEM inventory, the Office of Regulatory Information Systems (ORIS) identification (ID) code identifies unique facilities and the unit ID identifies unique boiler s and internal combustion engines (i.e., turbines and reciprocating engines). In the S/L inventories , the state and county FIPS and state facility ID together identify unique facilities and the EU ID i dentifies unique boilers or internal combustion engines. However, in some of the S/L inventories, the emissions for multiple EUs were summed and reported under the same EU ID. Thus, an Excel Workbook was sent to the S/L agencies that

contained an initial crosswalk with the ORIS ID and unit ID in the CEM inventory matched to the state and county FIPS, state facility ID, and E U ID in the S/L inventory. Agencies were asked to confirm/correct/supplement the information in the crosswalk. The initial crosswalk also contained annual emissions summed from the hourly C EM emissions and flags that indicated if

## 7

CEM units were subject to reporting requirements un der the NO

x 

## SIP Call and/or Title IV of the CAA. It should be noted that the initial matching of the IDs in both inventories was based on previous crosswalks that had been developed for the 1999 NEI and in-house information compiled by Pechan. The matching at the facility l evel was nearly complete; however, S/L agency assistance was needed to match most of CEM u nits to EUs in the S/L inventories.

The crosswalk was updated with corrections to facil ity and CEM unit-to-EU matches, and with new matches provided by the S/L agencies. The matc hing of each CEM unit to an EU was still incomplete. Consequently, the comparison of annual emissions was performed at the facility

level.

The second stage in the CEM analysis was to prepare an Excel Workbook file for each S/L agency that compared the annual emissions summed fr om the hourly CEM inventory to the annual emissions reported in the S/L inventory. Th e file included three spreadsheets that compared annual emissions at the facility level, li sted the facilities in the CEM inventory that

could not be matched to the facilities in the S/L i nventory, and listed the facilities in the S/L inventory identified as an electricity generating u nit (EGU) that could not be matched to a facility in the CEM inventory. The Excel files wer e sent to the S/L agencies for review. The S/L agencies then indicated if they did or did not want to use the hourly CEM inventory.

The facility-level comparison of CEM to emission in ventory NO

x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions found that for some facilities, the annual emissions from the S/L inventory exceeded the CEM annual emissions because the facility in the S/L inventory contained more than just CEM units. This condition was determined to be acceptable. However , S/L agencies were asked to review data for facilities where the CEM emissions were higher than the emissions summed from the S/L inventory. For these cases, CEM emissions may be h igher than those reported in a S/L inventory due to methods EPA uses for using artificially high default values to fill in hourly CEM data when not reported or when a CEM unit was not workin g properly.

After reviewing the comparison of the CEM to S/L in ventory emissions, New York and Vermont elected to use the 2002 CEM inventory containing ho urly NO

x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions for all facilities. Maryland; New Hampshire; and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania elected to use the

2002 CEM data for some but not all of the facilitie s within their jurisdiction. The Excel Workbook files containing the comparison of CEM to S/L inventories provides a spreadsheet identifying the facilities for which these S/L agen cies elected to use the CEM inventory.

Subsequent to the completion of this analysis, it w as determined that the structure of the EPA/CAMD file would not be compatible with the form at of the SMOKE input file. The

database structure did not affect the annual emissi ons summed from the hourly CEM emissions used in the comparison to S/L inventory data. For each of the S/L agencies that elected to use the 2002 CEM data, CAMD agreed to provide separate database files for each state with a structure compatible with the SMOKE input file form at. Pechan then used the crosswalk to add to the CEM inventory files the state and county FIP S, state facility ID, and EU ID (if the crosswalk contains a CEM unit to EU match) to the h ourly CEM database files provided by

CAMD. The modified database was then used to creat e the SMOKE input files for these states.

## 8

Note that Delaware requested that the 2002 CEM inve ntory for its facilities not be used for regional haze modeling. However, if the consolidat ed point source inventory prepared under this project is used to support ozone episode modeling, Delaware may consider using the CEM hourly data for the episodes modeled. Therefore, t he 2002 CEM inventory was also processed

for Delaware’s facilities.

ii. PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness Revie w

The following consistency checks were performed at the EM table data key level (for annual emissions) to compare PM emissions:

• If a process was associated with a PM emission reco rd, but was missing one or more of the following (as appropriate for the SCC [i.e., condensible PM (PM-CON) is associated with fuel combustion only]): filterable PM 10 

## (PM10-FIL), primary PM 10 

## (PM10-PRI), filterable PM 2.5 

## (PM25-FIL), primary PM 2.5 

## (PM25-PRI), or PM-CON, the record was flagged for review.

• The following equations were used to determine cons istency:

PM10-FIL + PM-CON = PM10-PRI

PM25-FIL + PM-CON = PM25-PRI

PM-FIL + PM-CON = PM-PRI

• The following comparisons were applied to determine consistency:

PM10-PRI >= PM10-FIL

PM25-PRI >= PM25-FIL

PM10-PRI >= PM-CON

PM25-PRI >= PM-CON

PM10-FIL >= PM25-FIL

PM10-PRI >= PM25-PRI

PM-PRI >= PM10-PRI

PM-PRI >= PM25-PRI

PM-FIL >= PM10-FIL

PM-FIL >= PM25-FIL

If the data failed one of these checks it was diagn osed as an error, summarized in an Excel Workbook file, and provided to the S/L agency for c orrections. If a S/L agency did not provide corrections to these errors, the errors were correc ted or filled in according to the augmentation procedures.

## 9 iii. ERP Coordinate Review

Location coordinates for point sources were evaluat ed using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to determine if the coordinates were within 0.5-kilometers of the boundary of the county in which the source was located. If not, th e S/L agency was asked to review the coordinates and provide corrections to either the c oordinates or the state and county FIPS codes. The 0.5-kilometer test resulted in a large number o f ERPs for review by the agencies. Therefore, to assist S/L agencies in prioritizing their review of coordinates, ERP records with coordinates located more than 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 or mor e kilometers from their county boundary, and coordinates that mapped outside of their state boun dary were identified. Annual emissions summed to the ERP level were included in the QA Sum mary Report to identify records with zero emissions for all pollutants and to identify the hi ghest emitting stacks. The QA Summary Report was provided to the S/L agency for review and corre ctions.

iv. ERP Parameter Review

The EPA’s QA guidance for diagnosing ERP issues for the point source NEI (EPA, 2004b) was applied to identify QA issues in the S/L point sour ce inventories. The QA guidance involved diagnosing the correct assignment of the ERP type ( i.e., stack or fugitive), parameters with zero values, parameters not within the range of values s pecified in the EPA’s QA procedures, and consistency checks (i.e., comparing calculated valu es against the values reported in the inventory). In many cases errors were caused by mi ssing or zero values. In other cases, out-ofrange errors were caused by unit conversion issues (e.g., stack parameters were in ft, ft/sec, cu ft/sec, or degrees Fahrenheit). The QA issues were summarized in a separate QA Summary Report for each agency and each agency was asked to provide corrections. If an agency did not provide corrections for out-of-range or missing val ues, the data were corrected or filled in according to the ERP augmentation procedures.

v. Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data Review

The CE codes in the “Primary Device Type Code” and “Secondary Device Type Code” fields were reviewed to identify invalid codes (i.e., code s that did not exist in the NIF 3.0 reference table) and missing codes (e.g., records with a null or uncontrolled code of 000 but with control efficiency data).

QA review of control efficiency data involved diagn osis of two types of errors. First, records were reviewed to identify control efficiency values that were reported as a decimal rather than as a percent value. Records with control efficiencies with decimal values were flagged as a potential error (although not necessarily an error, since the real control efficiency may be less than 1%).

The second check identified records where 100% cont rol was reported in the CE table, but the emissions in the EM table were greater than zero an d the rule effectiveness value in the EM table was null, zero, or 100% (implying 100% control of e missions). Because many agencies did not populate the rule effectiveness field or a default value of zero was assigned, records with null or

zero rule effectiveness values were included where the CE was 100% and emissions were greater

## 10

than zero. The records that met these criteria wer e summarized in a QA Summary Report for review and correction, if necessary, by the S/L age ncy.

vi. Start and End Date Checks

QA review was conducted to identify start date and end date values in the PE and EM tables to confirm consistency with the inventory year in the TR table, and to confirm that the end date reported was greater than the start date reported. This check did not identify any QA issues in the three versions of the inventory.

vii. Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison

The following QA checks were conducted to identify potential errors associated with the incorrect reporting of daily and/or annual emission s:

• Any “DAILY” type record that is greater than its as sociated “ANNUAL”.

A review of the daily vs. annual comparison reveale d that in many cases, the daily value was nonzero (but very small), but the annual value was zero. This was generally a result of rounding in a S/L agency’s original emissions database, wher e annual records were recorded in tons per year to a set number of decimal places, while the c orresponding daily records were recorded in pounds per year to a set number of decimal places. The annual record rounds to zero in the original database, while the daily value remains no n-zero. A tolerance check reveals the following (comparison in tons):

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> 0

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .000001

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .00001

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .0001

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .001

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .01

For Version 1, the affected S/L agencies were as fo llows:

• Connecticut (09) 11 records

• Maine (23) 4 records

• Maryland (24) 72 records

• New Jersey (34) 2935 records

• Pennsylvania Allegheny County (42003) 17 records

• Pennsylvania Philadelphia County (42101) 146 recor ds

• Rhode Island (44) 1 record

Rhode Island, Philadelphia, and New Jersey responde d that the dailies that were greater than the annuals could be deleted. Maryland determined that they should be kept since the difference values were small. The records for the remaining S /L agencies were kept. This QA issue only occurred during processing of Version 1.

## 11 b. Responses from S/L agencies

Each S/L agency reviewed its “QA Summary Report” fi les and the S/L agency provided direction for correcting QA issues either in the QA Summary Report Excel files or via e-mail. The inventory was then revised to incorporate respo nses from each agency and the QA checks were run again to verify that the QA issues were ad dressed. If an agency responded to a QA issue by e-mail, the direction was recorded in the “QA Summary Report” file. The “QA Summary Report” file for each S/L agency was updated to document QA issues and resolution of issues associated with developing Versions 2 and 3 of the point source inventory. The “QA Summary Report” files for Version 3 are provided wi th this report in a separate zip file. The files in the zip file are organized in separate fol ders for each S/L agency. Each folder includes a separate Excel workbook file for the following QA c hecks if a QA issue existed:

• PM Augmentation QA Summary;

• Stack Parameter QA Summary;

• Stack Coordinates QA Summary;

• Stack Parameter and Coordinate Augmentation Summary ;

• CEM Comparisons and Revisions; and

• Control Device/Efficiency Summary.

c. Gap Filling and Augmentation

The following discusses the augmentation procedures that were used to fill in missing data that were not supplied by the S/L agencies. The S/L age ncies approved the procedures before they were applied. These procedures were applied after revising the inventory to address QA issues as directed by each S/L agency.

i. MANE-VU-Sponsored Inventories

MANE-VU prepared a 2002 NH 3 

## emissions inventory for cement kilns for SCCs 3050 0606 and 30500706 located in four MANE-VU states. Maryland chose to add one new facility 24013/0012 (state and county FIPS code/facility ID) . New York chose to add the following three sites 36001/4010300016, 36001/4012400001, and 36111/3514800084. Maine and Pennsylvania chose not to add emissions from this i nventory. The data for Maryland and New

York were added to Version 1. These data were not changed in Versions 2 and 3 of the point source inventory.

ii. PM Augmentation

The PM augmentations process gap-fills missing PM p ollutant complements. For example, if a S/L agency provided only PM10-PRI pollutants the PM augmentation process filled in the PM25-PRI pollutants. The steps in the PM augmentat ion process were as follows:

• Step 1: Initial QA and remediation of S/L provided PM pollutants;

## 12

• Step 2: Development of PM factor ratios based on f actors from the Factor Information and REtrieval (FIRE) Data System, versi on 6.2, and the PM Calculator (EPA, 2003a; EPA, 2004c);

• Step 3: Implementation of the ratios developed in step 2.; and

• Step 4: Presentation of PM augmentation results to S/L agencies for review and

comment.

An Access database (named Reference Tables for PM Augmentation ) accompanies this

document. This database contains the SCC Control D evice Ratio table, the Emission Factors table, and Emission Factors Crosstab table discusse d in Step 2. The Emission Factors Crosstab table contains the ratios developed from the Emissi on Factors table. The Emission Factors table

contains detailed information on the emission facto rs used to develop the ratios. The PM Calculator ratio table can be provided upon request – it contains all possible combinations for SCC and Control Device types that are available in the PM Calculator. Ratios from the PM calculator were developed using a standard input of 100 TONS of uncontrolled PM-FIL

emissions.

1. Initial QA and Remediation of PM Pollutants

S/L agencies were initially presented with files th at detailed potential inconsistencies and missing information in their PM pollutant inventory . Inconsistencies in PM pollutants include the following:

• PM-PRI less than PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25 -FIL, or PM-CON;

• PM-FIL less than PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL;

• PM10-PRI less than PM25-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL or PM-CON;

• PM10-FIL less than PM25-FIL;

• PM25-PRI less than PM25-FIL or PM-CON;

• The sum of PM10-FIL and PM-CON not equal to PM10-PR I; and

• The sum of PM25-FIL and PM-CON not equal to PM25-PR I.

Potential missing information was summarized in a t able which detailed the variety of cases provided by each S/L agency. For example, an S/L a gency might have provided PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL for some processes, but provided only PM10 -FIL for other processes.

S/L agencies were asked to review this information and provide corrections where possible. In general, corrections (or general directions) were p rovided in the case of the potential inconsistency issues. An example of a general dire ction provided by a S/L agency was to remove PM25-FIL where greater than PM10-FIL because the PM10-FIL was (in their particular case) known to be more reliable. In other cases, t he agency-provided specific process-level pollutant corrections. If specific direction was n ot provided by the agency, zero PM pollutants were generally removed, or complements were set equ al to the higher number.

## 13

2. Development of PM Factor Ratio

The primary deliverable of this step of the process was the development of a table keyed by SCC, primary control device, and secondary control device. This table is called the SCC Control Device Ratios table (see Table II-1). This table w as filled according to the following steps:

• Ratios (both condensible and noncondensible) were a dded from FIRE for SCCs starting with 10* (external fuel combustion) and 20 * (internal fuel combustion) where there was a direct match between the provided SCC, and primary and secondary

control devices.

• Ratios (non-condensable) were added from the PM Cal culator for SCCs starting with

10* and 20* where there was not a direct match betw een the provided SCC, and primary and secondary control devices. Condensible ratios were added from the PM

Calculator based on the uncontrolled SCC for these SCCs. In some cases, it was necessary to map the SCC and control devices to the PM calculator to find a match for the noncondensible ratios. In other cases, it was necessary to map the SCC to

FIRE to find a match for condensible ratios.

• For natural gas, process gas, and liquified petrole um gas (LPG) SCCs starting with 10* and 20*, it was assumed (based on FIRE emission factors) that the PMPRI/PM10-PRI/PM25-PRI ratio was equal to 1. It was also assumed that the PMFIL/PM10- FIL /PM25- FIL was equal to 1. Condensib le ratios were calculated from

uncontrolled FIRE emission factors for these SCCs. In some cases it was necessary to map the SCC to FIRE to find a match for condensi ble ratios.

• Ratios for SCCs not like 10* and 20* were obtained from the PM Calculator. It was assumed that the condensible component was zero.

## 14

Table II-1. Description of the Field Names and Des criptions for the SCC Control

Device Ratios Table

Field Name Field Description

PM Calculator A “Yes” in this field indicates that at least some of the information was retrieved from the PM
Calculator

FIRE A “Yes” in this field indicates that at least some of the information was retrieved from the Emis sion
Factors table. A “Condensible Ratios” in this fiel d indicates that the condensible ratios factors wer e retrieved from this table.

Other A field to indicate other sources as necessar y. SCC Source category code from the S/L agency-provid ed data. SCC_DESC Description of source category code from t he S/L agency-provided data. maptoSCC This field equals SCC unless the SCC provi ded was not found in the appropriate source table. In that case, the SCC was mapped using the closest ava ilable appropriate mapping choice. maptoSCC_DESC Description of the maptoSCC. mapSCCNote Any notes related to the mapping of the SCC. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the SCC was mapped. PD Primary device type from the S/L agency provided data. PD_DESC Description of the primary device (PD). maptoPD This field equals PD unless the PD provided was not found in the appropriate source table. In that case, the PD was mapped using the closest available appropriate mapping choice. maptoPD_DESC Description of the maptoPD. mapPDNote Any notes related to the mapping of the P D. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the PD was mapped. SD Secondary device type from the S/L agency provid ed data. SD_DESC Description of the secondary device (SD). maptoSD This field equals SD unless the SD provided was not found in the appropriate source table. In that case, the SD was mapped using the closest available appropriate mapping choice. maptoSD_DESC Description of the maptoSD. mapSDNote Any notes related to the mapping of the S D. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the SD was mapped. PM-FIL/PM10-FIL This field and the following are ra tios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the
PM calculator. PM-FIL/PM25-FIL This field and the following are ra tios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator. PM-FIL/PM-PRI This field and the following are rati os calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator. PM-PRI/PM10-PRI This field and the following are ra tios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator. PM-PRI/PM25-PRI This field and the following are ra tios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator. PM10-FIL/PM25-FIL This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found eithe r in FIRE or the
PM calculator. PM10-PRI/PM25-PRI This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found eithe r in FIRE or the

PM calculator.

PM-CON/PM10-FIL Condensible ratios were calculate f rom FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If con densible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero.
PM-CON/PM10-PRI Condensible ratios were calculate f rom FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If con densible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero.
PM-CON/PM25-FIL Condensible ratios were calculate f rom FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If con densible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero.
PM-CON/PM25-PRI Condensible ratios were calculate f rom FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If con densible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero.
PM-CON/PM-FIL Condensible ratios were calculate fro m FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If conde nsible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero.
PM-CON/PM-PRI Condensible ratios were calculate fro m FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If conde nsible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. RPO Specific Note Indicates SCC and control device combinations are in the RPO inventory. Additional Notes Any notes regarding assumptions ab out ratios.

## 15

3. Implementation of the QA Ratios

In order to calculate the additional PM pollutants based on the SCC Control Device ratio table developed in the above step, a crosstab table was c reated from the EM table based on the following fields:

• State FIPS

• County FIPS

• Tribal Code

• EU ID

• Process ID

• Start Date

• End Date

• Emission Type

• SCC

• Primary Device Type

• Secondary Device Type

The primary and secondary device type fields were a dded based on information from the CE

table. If CE information was not available these f ields were defaulted to 000 (“UNCONTROLLED”). In the few cases where there was a conflict between the control devices reported for the same process for PM pollutants (e. g., a PM10-PRI is listed as controlled, but PM-PRI did not have control information), the contr ol device type was selected based on the controlled pollutant.

In addition to the fields listed above, the crossta b included the PM emission amounts for the particular process and a field that indicated wheth er those emissions existed in the inventory.

These fields were as follows:

• PM_PRI

• PM_FIL

• PM10_PRI

• PM10_FIL

• PM25_PRI

• PM25_FIL

• PM_CON

• PM_PRI_EXISTS

• PM_FIL_EXISTS

• PM10_PRI_EXISTS

• PM10_FIL_EXISTS

• PM25_PRI_EXISTS

• PM25_FIL_EXISTS

• PM_CON_EXISTS

## 16

The emission values were in the PM_PRI, PM_FIL, PM1 0_PRI, PM10_FIL, PM25_PRI, PM25_FIL, PM_CON fields. The _EXISTS field indicat ed whether the pollutant was provided by the S/L agency. A zero indicated that the pollu tant was not provided; a number greater than zero (usually one) indicates that it was provided b y the S/L agency.

Prior to the development of this crosstab, the EM t able was filled in as much as possible using basic assumptions. For example, if the S/L agency provided zero emissions for some but not all forms of PM for a particular process, it was assume d that all forms of PM for that process were zero and they were filled in accordingly. Since th at assumption was that for non 10* and 20* SCCs, the condensible value was zero – that would l ead to PM10-FIL = PM10-PRI and PM25-

FIL = PM25-PRI and PM-FIL = PM-PRI. Given that ass umption, values for these pollutants were also filled in. After this data insertion, a subset of the crosstab was created. This subset only contained processes that required additional a ugmentation. The SCC Control Device Type ratio table was based on only those SCC and control device types that required augmentation.

The next step was to fill in the missing informatio n in this crosstab using the information found

in the SCC Control Device Ratio table.

In calculating PM complement pollutants, priority w as given to calculating –PRI and –CON pollutants. FIL pollutants were only calculated if necessary to calculate other pollutants or if it was a by-product of this calculation.

In augmenting the PM pollutants, the non 10* and 20 * SCCs were augmented first, with order given to augmenting based on PM 10 

## where available, PM 2.5 

## where available, and then PM.

Augmenting the PM pollutants for the 10* and 20* SC Cs is more complicated, but the basic approach was to augment based on PM 10 

## (FIL or PRI) where available, PM 2.5 

## (FIL or PRI) where available, and then PM (FIL or PRI) if PM 10 

## or PM 2.5 

## variations were not available. Where both

PM 10 

## (FIL or PRI) and PM 2.5 

## (FIL or PRI) variations were both available, the c alculation for PM-CON was generally driven from the PM 10 

## number and the complements as necessary were

back calculated. Where a PRI emission factor ratio was required and was not available, the FIL

emission factor ratio was used.

After completing the calculations, the data was QA checked to ensure that the calculations resulted in consistent values for the PM complement . On a few occasions, the mix of ratio value and the pollutants and values provided by the S/L a gency resulted in negative values when FIL was back-calculated. In this case the negative FIL value was set to zero and the PRI value was readjusted. In a few cases the appropriate combina tion of ratios, SCC, and control efficiencies

were not available to calculate the PM10-PRI and PM 25-PRI values. In these cases, PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were set equal. The resultant PM tabl e information was appended to the EM

table.

Note: The augmentation procedures resulted in some high condensible ratios that were calculated for some SCC control device type combina tions. In most cases, these high

condensible ratios were the result of the back calc ulation of PM-CON from PMxx-PRI records.

## 17

Since the state had already provided the PMxx-PRI r ecords, these PM-CON values were not

added.

The data source code field was used to identify rec ords that were added to the inventory to complete the set of PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions

.

iii. ERP Coordinates

If an S/L agency did not provide corrections for ER P coordinates that map more than 5 km outside of the county boundary, or provide coordina tes for ERP records that did not have any coordinates in the S/L inventory, the following pro cedures were applied to replace the

coordinates:

• Coordinates for other ERPs at the same facility, if available, that map within the

county;

• Coordinates for the centroid of the zip code for a facility if a valid zip code was provided or could be obtained from the agency if it is not valid; or

• County centroid coordinates.

The zip code was taken from the SI NIF 3.0 table. The zip code was compared to a reference table of valid zip codes to verify that it was an a ctive zip code and existed in the state and county reported in the inventory. If a valid zip code for a facility could not be identified, the centroid for the facility’s county was used as a last resort . In some cases, the S/L agency provided

confirmation that the S/L coordinates were correct even if the analysis indicated that the coordinates were outside of the county. These coor dinates were not changed. Additionally, all coordinates were converted to latitude/longitude me asurements.

iv. ERP Parameters

If valid ERP parameters were not provided by the S/ L agency, the ERP augmentation procedures that EPA developed for the 2002 point source NEI we re applied to the MANE-VU inventory (EPA, 2004b). It has been determined that the augm entation procedures in this document regarding SCC-specific ERP types and temperatures m ay be difficult to resolve. When this situation occurs, preference was given to the S/L a gency -supplied ERP type and SCC. For example, the procedures do not account for cases wh ere an EU has two processes with one defined as a stack source and the other as a fugiti ve source. Therefore, the S/L-supplied ERP type was used when this situation occurred. If the ERP type was null, and information was not available from the S/L agency, the stack height inf ormation was used as a guide. If stack height information was available, the ERP was treated as a stack, if stack height information was not available, the ERP was treated as a fugitive. An a dditional modification to the augmentation procedure was also implemented. Since in many case s null values were filled in with zeros by S/L local databases when comparing out-of-range vel ocities and flows (after it was determined

that the stack and diameter information was correct ) – null and zero values were treated in the same manner to prevent inappropriate replacement of stack parameter values. Additionally, stack parameter values were rounded to 1 decimal pl ace when comparing with range values (just

## 18

for the purposes of comparison) to prevent replacem ent of S/L parameter values based on negligible decimal differences.

v. Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data

Control efficiencies that were 100% and rule effect iveness of 100% with non-zero emissions were diagnosed as potential errors and sent to the S/L agencies. Where possible these data were updated with S/L data corrections. Decimal control efficiencies were also diagnosed and sent to the S/L agencies. A decimal control efficiency was usually a sign that a control efficiency had not been entered as a percentage as is required by NIF 3.0. Where possible these data was updated with S/L data corrections.

c. QA Review of Final Inventory

Final QA checks were run on the revised point sourc e inventory data set to ensure that all corrections provided by the S/L agencies were incor porated into the S/L inventories and that there were no remaining QA issues that could be add ressed during the duration of the project. The EPA QA program was run on the inventory and the QA output was reviewed to verify that all QA issues that could be addressed were resolved . The QA output file was provided in an Access database along with Version 3 of the invento ry.

3. Version 3 Emissions Summary

Table II-2 presents a State-level summary of the an nual point source emissions in Version 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. Note that PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions are included in the inventory for all SCCs for which S/L agencies r eported any form of PM, PM 10 

## , and/or PM 2.5 

## emissions. If an agency did not report PM10-PRI an d/or PM25-PRI but reported PM-PRI, PMFIL, PM-CON, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL, the PM augm entation procedures discussed in the TSD were applied to the form of PM emissions suppli ed by the agency to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM emissions. If an agency repo rted PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI emissions but not PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, or PM-CON emissions, th e agency's inventory was not augmented to calculate filterable or condensible em issions. Note that PM-CON is associated with only fuel combustion sources.

## 19

Table II-2. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Point Source Em issions by State (Tons/Year)

State CO NH 3 NO
x PM10-

FIL PM10-

PRI PM25-

FIL PM25-

PRI PM-CON SO 2 VOC

Connecticut 4,053 12,923 738 1,617 0 1,283 389 15 ,988 4,907

Delaware 9,766 196 16,345 2,466 4,217 1,919 3,666 1 ,750 73,744 4,755

District of
Columbia 248 4 780 91 161 54 132 68 963 69

Maine 17,005 845 19,939 4,535 7,289 2,567 5,787 2,7 53 23,711 5,319

Maryland 99,024 305 95,328 3,723 9,029 0 5,054 2,01 8 290,927 6,184

Massachusetts 21,262 1,463 47,086 2,776 5,852 997 4 ,161 2,984 101,049 8,263

New Hampshire 2,725 74 9,759 1,180 3,332 786 2,938 2,151 46,560 1 ,599

New Jersey 12,300 51,593 2,928 6,072 2,543 4,779 3 61,217 14,401

New York 66,427 1,861 118,978 1,808 10,392 1,965 7, 080 210 294,729 11,456

Pennsylvania 121,524 1,388 297,379 18,044 40,587 6, 038 20,116 5,065 995,175 37,323

Rhode Island 2,234 58 2,764 233 300 117 183 68 2,66 6 1,928

Vermont 1,078 787 130 304 97 267 2 905 1,097

MANE-VU 357,645 6,194 673,660 38,654 89,150 17,083 55,447 17,462 1,907,634 97,300

## 20

B. State-Specific Methods

For each of the MANE-VU states and two local agenci es in Pennsylvania, this section identifies the temporal basis of the emissions included in Ver sion 3 and discusses revisions incorporated into Version 3. In addition, this section also dis cusses the origin of each S/L agency’s emissions included in Version 3. For each agency, a table is provided in Appendix A that lists the data source codes by SCC, emission type period, and poll utant. In addition, an electronic folder is provided for each S/L agency containing the QA Summ ary Reports prepared during Version 1 and other files documenting revisions included in V ersions 2 and 3.

1. Connecticut

Connecticut’s Version 3 point source inventory orig inates from Version 1 except for the following revisions that Connecticut provided for V ersion 2 and included in Version 3:

• Changed coordinates for AES Thames, Inc. in New Lon don County to -72.3184, 41.4499 (FIPS code 09011, facility identifier 1544).

• Changed values for Hartford Steam (FIPS code 09003, facility identifier 3471), EU P0250, process 02 for summer daily values as follows: Cha nged actual throughput from 1934 E6FT3 to 1.934 E6FT3, CO summer daily emissions fro m 53.185 tons to 0.0532 tons,

NO

x 

## summer daily emissions from 255.288 tons to 0.1021 tons, and VOC summer daily

emissions from 1.2569 tons to 0.0027 tons.

Table II-3 shows the emission type periods for whic h Connecticut provided emissions.

Table II-3. Connecticut 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 27

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 27

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29



## Table A-1 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This tabl e also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. Connecticut provided the data for CO, NO

x 

## , PM10-PRI, SO 2 

## , and VOC. Connecticut did not provide any data for NH 3 

## . Emissions for PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and PM-CON were calculated from the PM10-PRI emissions provided by Connecticut using the PM augmentation procedures.

## 21 2. Delaware

Delaware’s Version 3 point source inventory origina tes from Version 1 except for some updates to ORIS Boiler IDs in the EU table that were incorp orated into Version 2 and included in Version 3. Table II-4 shows the emission type peri ods for which Delaware provided emissions.

Table II-4. Delaware 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29



## Table A-2 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This tabl e also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. Delaware provided the data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Delaware also provided much of the PM emissions data but in some cases the PM augm entation procedures were applied to the PM data provided by Delaware to calculate emissions for other forms of PM (e.g., to estimate PM10-PRI from PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI from PM25-FIL, PM1 0-PRI and PM10-FIL from PM25- PRI and PM25-FIL).

3. District of Columbia

The District of Columbia’s Version 3 point source i nventory originates from Version 1. Table II-5 shows the emission type period for which the D istrict of Columbia provided emissions.

Table II-5. District of Columbia 2002 Point, Versi on 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ype

Emission Type

Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30



## Table A-3 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This tabl e also shows the number of counties by SCC. The District of Columbia provided the data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. The District of Columbia provided at least one form of PM emissions and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions provided by the Distr ict of Columbia to calculate emissions for the

other forms of PM.

## 22 4. Maine

Maine’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. Table II-6 shows the emission type periods for which Maine provided emis sions.

Table II-6. Maine 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29



## Table A-4 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This tabl e also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. Maine provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Maine provided PM10- FIL and/or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM augme ntation procedures were applied to the emissions that Maine provided to calculate emission s for the other forms of PM.

5. Maryland

Maryland’s Version 3 point source inventory origina tes from Version 1 except for some updates to ORIS Boiler IDs in the EU table that were incorp orated into Version 2 and included in Version 3. Table II-7 shows the emission type peri ods for which Maryland provided emissions.

Table II-7. Maryland 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type

Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20040101 20041231 30

NONANNUAL 20020101 20021231 29

NONANNUAL 20020501 20020930 29

NONANNUAL 20040101 20041231 29



## Table A-5 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This tabl e also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. Maryland provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , VOC, PM10-PRI, and PM-PRI. The PM augmentation procedures were applied to the PM10-PRI emissions that Maryland provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. Maryland provided NH 3 

## emissions for its point sources except for one new facility ( state and county FIPS code 24013, facility ID 0012, SCC 30500622, data source code P) for which i t used NH 3 

## emissions for four EUs (preheater kiln/dry process) prepared by MANE-VU.

## 23 6. Massachusetts

Massachusetts’ Version 3 point source inventory ori ginates from Version 1 except for the some stack parameter revisions that Massachusetts provid ed and were incorporated into Version 3. For Version 3, Massachusetts provided revisions to stack parameters in the ERP table for six

EUs at three facilities. The revisions are listed in the Excel file named “MA Revisions to
MANEVU V3 Point EI_040706.xls”. Table II-8 shows t he emission type periods for which Massachusetts provided emissions.

Table II-8. Massachusetts 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20030101 20031231 30



## Table A-6 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This tabl e also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. Massachusetts provided the emissions data for CO, N H 3 

## , NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Massachusetts provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL emission s data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Massa chusetts provided to calculate emissions for

the other forms of PM.

7. New Hampshire

New Hampshire’s Version 3 point source inventory or iginates from Version 1. Table II-9 shows the emission type periods for whic h New Hampshire provided emissions.

Table II-9. New Hampshire 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type

Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29



## Table A-7 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This tabl e also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. New Hampshire provided the emissions data for CO, N H 3 

## , NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. New Hampshire provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FI L emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissio ns that New Hampshire provided to

calculate emissions for the other forms of PM.

## 24 8. New Jersey

New Jersey’s Version 3 point source inventory origi nates from Version 1. In addition to the QA checks discussed previously in this TSD, New Jersey ’s original inventory submittal to EPA contained several issues with SCCs. For Version 1, per direction provided by New Jersey, SCCs that were less than 8 digits were changed to SCCs w ith 8 digits. Also, as approved by New Jersey, inactive SCC 39999901 was changed to active SCC 39999999. The invalid unit “GAL” was changed to the valid unit “E6GAL” in the EP tab le.

Table II-10 shows the emission type periods for whi ch New Jersey provided emissions.

Table II-10. New Jersey 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29



## Table A-8 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This tabl e also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. New Jersey provided the emissions data for CO, NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. New Jersey provided PMPRI, PM10-PRI, and/or PM25-PRI emissions data and t he PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that New Jersey provided t o calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. New Jersey did not provide any data for NH 3



## .

9. New York

New York’s Version 3 point source inventory origina tes from Version 1 except for the following revisions that New York provided and were incorpora ted into Version 3.

For Version 3, New York provided an Access database named “MANEVU_NY2002_
Point_Corrected_093005.mdb” with revisions to recor ds in the EM table. New York also provided in this database 651 records that were not included in Version 2 of MANE-VU's point source inventory, and, therefore, these records wer e added to Version 3 of MANE-VU's point source inventory. The new records added emissions for pollutants (not in Version 2) for EUs and processes that existed in Version 2 of MANE-VU' s point source inventory.

The records in Version 2 that were revised and the records that were added to Version 3 are

listed in the Excel file named “NY Revisions to MAN E-VU V3 Point EI_040706.xls”. Table II-11 shows the emission type period for whic h New York provided emissions.

## 25 Table II-11. New York 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ype

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30



## Table A-9 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This tabl e also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. New York provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. New York provided PM-PRI, PM10-PRI, and/or PM25-PRI emissions data an d the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that New York provide d to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. New York provided NH 3 

## emissions for its point sources except for four ce ment kilns for

which it used NH 3 

## emissions from a MANE-VU-sponsored inventory. The following identifies the facilities for which the MAEN-VU-sponsored NH 3 

## emissions inventory for cement kilns was

used.

FIPS Code Facility ID SCC Data Source 36001 4010300016 30500606 (2 kilns/dry process) P 36001 4012400001 30500706 (1 kiln/wet process) P 36111 3514800084 30500606 (1 kiln/dry process) P



## 10. Pennsylvania (State, Excluding Allegheny and Ph iladelphia Counties)

The Version 3 point source inventory for the state of Pennsylvania originates from Version 1. The following summary excludes Allegheny and Philad elphia Counties who provided their own point source inventories for Versions 1, 2, and 3.

Table II-12 shows the emission type periods for whi ch Pennsylvania provided emissions. Table A-10 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by S CC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table a lso shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. Pennsylvania provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Pennsylvania provided PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI emissions data an d the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Pennsylvania pro vided to calculate emissions for the other

forms of PM.

## 26 Table II-12. Pennsylvania 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20020104 30 ANNUAL 20020131 2002081 2 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020111 30 ANNUAL 20020131 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020120 30 ANNUAL 20020201 2002022 8 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020123 30 ANNUAL 20020201 2002042 4 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020130 30 ANNUAL 20020201 2002083 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020131 30 ANNUAL 20020201 2002093 0 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020212 30 ANNUAL 20020201 2002103 0 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020215 30 ANNUAL 20020201 2002113 0 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020221 30 ANNUAL 20020201 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020228 30 ANNUAL 20020205 2002122 3 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020313 30 ANNUAL 20020213 2002091 3 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020329 30 ANNUAL 20020214 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020331 30 ANNUAL 20020216 2002033 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020412 30 ANNUAL 20020301 2002033 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020414 30 ANNUAL 20020301 2002043 0 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020422 30 ANNUAL 20020301 2002053 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020427 30 ANNUAL 20020301 2002103 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020430 30 ANNUAL 20020301 2002113 0 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020503 30 ANNUAL 20020301 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020514 30 ANNUAL 20020311 2002121 3 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020517 30 ANNUAL 20020311 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020521 30 ANNUAL 20020314 2002120 9 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020531 30 ANNUAL 20020318 2002122 3 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020603 30 ANNUAL 20020320 2002091 5 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020614 30 ANNUAL 20020320 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020626 30 ANNUAL 20020328 2002112 0 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020628 30 ANNUAL 20020330 2002112 2 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020630 30 ANNUAL 20020401 2002043 0 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020701 30 ANNUAL 20020401 2002053 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020731 30 ANNUAL 20020401 2002073 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020813 30 ANNUAL 20020401 2002093 0 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020831 30 ANNUAL 20020401 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020909 30 ANNUAL 20020409 2002120 5 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020415 2002111 7 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021031 30 ANNUAL 20020415 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021101 30 ANNUAL 20020421 2002102 4 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021112 30 ANNUAL 20020424 2002101 6 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021130 30 ANNUAL 20020428 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021213 30 ANNUAL 20020429 2002092 2 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021216 30 ANNUAL 20020429 2002103 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021217 30 ANNUAL 20020501 2002063 0 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021220 30 ANNUAL 20020501 2002093 0 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020501 2002101 3 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021230 30 ANNUAL 20020501 2002103 1 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020501 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20020703 30 ANNUAL 20020506 2002120 2 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021203 30 ANNUAL 20020511 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021215 30 ANNUAL 20020515 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020519 2002072 7 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021227 30 ANNUAL 20020525 2002123 1 30

## 27 Table II-12. (Continued)

Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020102 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020601 2002060 2 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021229 30 ANNUAL 20020601 2002083 1 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021230 30 ANNUAL 20020601 2002093 0 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020601 2002101 9 30

ANNUAL 20020103 20021126 30 ANNUAL 20020603 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020103 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020606 2002112 7 30

ANNUAL 20020103 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020629 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020104 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020701 2002073 1 30

ANNUAL 20020104 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020701 2002093 0 30

ANNUAL 20020104 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020701 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020105 20021218 30 ANNUAL 20020708 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020105 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 2002083 1 30

ANNUAL 20020106 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 2002093 0 30

ANNUAL 20020107 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 2002113 0 30

ANNUAL 20020108 20021221 30 ANNUAL 20020801 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020108 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020802 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020110 20021204 30 ANNUAL 20020901 2002093 0 30

ANNUAL 20020111 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020901 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020113 20021006 30 ANNUAL 20020920 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020114 20021203 30 ANNUAL 20021001 2002103 0 30

ANNUAL 20020115 20020318 30 ANNUAL 20021001 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020115 20020323 30 ANNUAL 20021028 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020115 20020326 30 ANNUAL 20021101 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020115 20020830 30 ANNUAL 20021118 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020123 20020127 30 ANNUAL 20021201 2002123 1 30

ANNUAL 20020124 20021127 30



## 11. Pennsylvania (Allegheny County, FIPS code 42003 )

The Version 3 point source inventory for Allegheny County, Pennsylvania originates from Version 1. Table II-13 shows the emission type per iods for which Allegheny County provided

emissions.

Table II-13. Pennsylvania - Allegheny County 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

## 28

Table A-11 in Appendix A identifies the data source s by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Allegheny County provided the emissions da ta for CO, NH 3 

## , NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Allegheny County provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, PM25-FI L, and/or PM-CON emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Allegheny County provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM.

12. Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County, FIPS code 42 101)

The Version 3 point source inventory for Philadelph ia County, Pennsylvania originates from Version 1. Table II-14 shows the emission type per iods for which Philadelphia County provided

emissions.

Table II-14. Pennsylvania - Philadelphia County 20 02 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29



## Table A-12 in Appendix A identifies the data source s by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Philadelphia County provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Philadelphia County provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/ or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissio ns that Philadelphia County provided to

calculate emissions for the other forms of PM.

13. Rhode Island

Rhode Island requested that their Version 2 invento ry be replaced with the CAP and NH 3 

## inventory in the final 2002 point source NEI that E PA released during March 2006. Therefore, all of Rhode Island’s point source data in Version 2 was replaced with the point source data provided in the final 2002 point source NEI. The f ollowing provides a summary of the QA

issues identified and addressed in Version 1. The Excel file named “RI Revisions to MANE-VU V3 Point EI_040706.xls” provides documentation and correction of each of these issues for

Version 3.

The Site table in the NEI did not include the ORIS IDs for all of the EGUs identified in the EGU crosswalk table. Therefore, the crosswalk table wa s used to add the ORIS IDs to the Site table. Matching of boiler IDs to the EU table for one faci lity was maintained in the NEI, and, therefore, included in Version 3 of MANE-VU’s inventory. Howe ver, matching of boiler IDs for other

facilities was not available in the crosswalk table

.

## 29

The data source codes that EPA used in the Rhode Is land’s point source inventory for the NEI were maintained in the MANE-VU inventory. The foll owing defines the codes:

Code Description A Augmented PM data. CAMD Record only in 2002 Emission Tracking System ( ETS)/CEM for

SO 2 

## , NO

x 

## , and heat input values; other emissions estimated.

SCAMD1 Data were received from the state. The sta te’s NO

x 

## and SO 2



## emission values were replaced with the ETS values. 99_PMPRI Not defined – presumed to mean PM-PRI data originating from the

1999 NEI. SUM Primary PM emissions calculated as the sum of t he filterable PM

and PM-CON emissions

DIFF PM-CON emissions calculated as the difference between the

primary PM and filterable PM emissions

QA of PM emissions was also performed in accordance with the QAPP for the 2002 base year inventory for EM table records that were revised or added for Rhode Island and New York. As a result, it was identified that the emission ton val ue was not correctly calculated from the

emission unit numerator and emission numeric value fields in the NEI file, therefore, the

emission ton value was corrected for the MANE-VU in ventory. In addition, the final NEI for

Rhode Island contained NH 3 

## emissions for several facilities but no SCCs were provided for the

NH 3 

## emissions; therefore, the NH 3 

## emissions were removed for the MANE-VU inventory a s requested by Rhode Island.

For Version 3 of MANE-VU's inventory, Facility ID E GU1036 and Facility Name MANCHESTER STREET in the final 2002 NEI was changed to Facility ID AIR936 and Facility Name USGEN NEW ENGLAND INC per Rhode Island’s reque st because this is the same facility (with ORIS ID 3236). Also, for State Faci lity ID AIR594, EU ID 2, ERP 2, and Process ID 2, the SCC was changed from 39000589 to 39000599 . In addition, the ORIS IDs reported in

the NEI were revised to make them consistent with t he crosswalk prepared for MANE-VU that matches state facility IDs to ORIS IDs.

One issue was identified with one record for Rhode Island where the sum of the PM10-FIL and

PM-CON emissions was more than the PM10-PRI emissio ns, and the sum of the PM25-FIL and

PM-CON emissions was more than the PM25-PRI emissio ns for facility ID AIR1248 in County FIPS 44007; SCC 10300601 (External Combustion Boile rs : Commercial/Institutional : Natural Gas : > 100 Million Btu/hr). In addition, the PM10 -FIL emissions reported was 1.6 tons more than the PM10-PRI emissions reported, and the PM25- FIL emissions reported was 1.6 tons more than the PM25-PRI emissions reported for this facil ity. The record has very low emissions and it was not clear how the PM consistency issues should be addressed; therefore, due to time and resource constraints, this issue was not corrected in Version 3.

Table II-15 shows the emission type periods for whi ch Rhode Island provided emissions.

## 30 Table II-15. Rhode Island 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 30



## Table A-13 in Appendix A identifies the data source s by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type perio d combinations are listed more than once

because the data source codes are different for mor e than one SCC and emission type period combination. Rhode Island provided the emissions d ata for CO, NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , VOC, and PM-PRI. The EPA applied PM augmentation procedures to the P M-PRI emissions that Rhode Island provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. The EPA added NH 3 

## emissions for an EGU from EPA’s CAMD data; otherwise, NH 3 

## emissions are not available for other point

sources in Rhode Island.

14. Vermont

Vermont’s Version 3 point source inventory originat es from Version 1. Table II-16 shows the emission type periods for which Vermont provided em issions.

Table II-16. Vermont 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20020101 20020331 27

NONANNUAL 20020101 20021231 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 27



## Table A-14 in Appendix A identifies the data source s by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type perio d combinations are listed more than once

because the data source codes are different for mor e than one SCC and emission type period combination. Vermont provided the emissions data f or CO, NO

x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Vermont provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL emission s data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Vermo nt provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. Vermont’s inventory does not in clude NH 3 

## emissions.

C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

This section provides a summary of potential revisi ons to incorporate into future versions of the MANE-VU point source inventory.

## 31

All States – A coordinated effort between the S/L a gencies should be developed to apply consistent methods to avoid having to apply procedu res to augment inventory data to correct for the QA issues and fill in missing data as discussed previously in this chapter. For example, this will ensure that consistent methods are applied acr oss S/L agencies to ensure accurate reporting of stack parameters, PM emissions, and minimize oth er QA issues that were identified during the development of Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the inventor y.

For PM emissions, the S/L agencies should develop a nd apply a consistent method for including

condensible emissions for fuel combustion sources t hat can be applied when the agencies develop their inventories. This may include compil ing the emission factors for all forms of PM into one database, organized by SCC and control typ e (for filterable emissions), and sharing the database among the MANE-VU S/L agencies. Use of a consistent set of emission factors will help to avoid the PM consistency issues identified in Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the MANE-VU inventory as well as ensure that condensible emissi ons are included in the primary emissions reported in the inventory.

The EGU crosswalk should be maintained to ensure th at State Facility IDs and EU IDs are correctly matched with ORIS IDs and boiler IDs.

State-specific suggestions are as follows:

Connecticut, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont – Include NH 3 

## emissions.

New Jersey – Develop a method to translate the SCCs that are less than 8 digits reported by facilities to 8 digit SCCs for reporting in the inv entory.

## 32

CHAPTER III

–

AREA SOURCES

A. General Methods for all States

1. What Data Sources Were Used?

Version 1 of the 2002 MANE-VU area source inventory was built on the inventories that the State agencies submitted to EPA from May through Ju ly of 2004 as a requirement of the CERR. Except for Rhode Island, all of the MANE-VU States also submitted area source inventories to EPA. Rhode Island elected to use the preliminary 2 002 NEI for its area source inventory. The EPA performed some limited QA review of the State i nventories to identify format, referential integrity, and duplicate record issues. The EPA re vised the inventories to address these issues and made the files available to the State agencies on August 6, 2004. These inventory files were used as the starting point for the MANE-VU inventor y. These inventory files were obtained from EPA, consolidated into a single data set, subj ected to extensive QA review, and revised (as approved by the MANE-VU State agencies) to address QA issues and fill data gaps identified while preparing Version 1. Subsequently, the follo wing agencies provided revisions to their area

source inventories:

• Version 2 – District of Columbia, Massachusetts, Ma ryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont.

• Version 3 – Massachusetts, Maine, New Jersey, New Y ork, and Rhode Island.

The Version 2 and 3 revisions for these States are discussed in section III.B (State-Specific Methods) of this chapter. In addition, as requeste d by MANE-VU, revisions were made to Version 3 to (1) add emissions for portable fuel co ntainers (PFCs), industrial adhesives, and

outdoor residential wood combustion for some States ; (2) decrease the PM 2.5 

## emissions for paved and unpaved roads and construction for all States; and (3) remove invalid CE records that originated from the preliminary 2002 NEI for some S tates. These revisions are explained in section III.A.3 of this chapter.

## 33

To track the origin of data, the temporal period of emissions, and to facilitate generation of emission summaries, the following NIF plus fields w ere added to the EP, PE, EM, and CE tables:

• Data Source Codes:

For the area source inventory data, the data source codes are based on the following 9-character

format:

[Data Origin]-[Year]-[Grown/Not Grown/Carried Forwa rd]-[PM Augmentation Code]

Code Field Length
Data Origin 1

Year 3 (including leading hyphen)
Grown/Not Grown/Carried Forward 2 (including lea ding hyphen) PM Augmentation 3 (including leading hyphen)

Data Origin Codes

Code Description S State agency-supplied data L Local agency-supplied data R Tribal agency-supplied data P Regional Planning Organization E EPA/Emission Factors and Inventory Group (EFIG)- generated data

Year Codes

Year for which data are supplied (e.g., Year = -02 for 2002), or from which prior year data are taken (e.g., Year = -99 for 1999; -01=2001 ).

Grown/Carried Forward/Not Grown Codes

Code Description -G Used when emissions in a pre-2002 inventory are grown to represent 2002

emissions. -F Used when emissions in a pre-2002 inventory are carried forward and included

in the 2002 inventory without adjustment for growth

. -X Used when the emissions are not grown or are no t carried forward. For

example, X is used when emissions are calculated fo r the 2002 inventory using 2002 activity, or when data are replaced with 2002 State data.

## 34

PM Augmentation Codes

-PA PM Augmented Emissions: Record for PM 10 

## /PM 2.5 

## emissions that were

updated or added using ad-hoc updates. -PC PM Augmented Emissions: Record added for PM 10 

## /PM 2.5 

## emissions estimated

using the PM Calculator. -PR PM Augmented Emissions: Record added for PM 10 

## /PM 2.5 

## emissions estimated

using ratios of PM 10 

## -to-PM or PM 2.5 

## -to-PM 10 

## . If PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## emissions are equal and one of the pollutants is assigned thi s code, the ratio is assumed to

be 1.

• Revision Date: This field indicates the month and year during which the last revision was

made to a record.

• State FIPS: This field indicates the State FIPS co de of the submittal.

• County FIPS: This field indicates the county FIPS code of the inventory.

The following NIF plus fields were added to the EM table:

• Emission Ton Value: This field indicates the value s of the emissions in tons. This field was used to prepare summaries of emissions on a con sistent EU basis.

• Emission Type Period: This field indicates the per iod of the Emission Type – either ANNUAL, SEASONAL, MONTHLY, or DAILY. Emission tabl e records designated as ANNUAL were used to prepare summaries of annual emi ssions.

• CAP_HAP: This field identifies records for CAP ver sus records for HAPs. For the MANE-VU inventory, the flag is CAP for all records.

• Year: This field indicates the year of the data; f or this inventory, it is 2002.

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed?

A QAPP was prepared and approved by MANE-VU/MARAMA and the EPA Regional Office prior to initiating work on Version 1 of the invent ory (MANE-VU, 2004a). This QAPP was followed during preparation of all three versions o f the inventory. This section provides an overview of the QA checks completed on each version of the inventory. The QA process for each State inventory involved the following steps t hat are also included in the following

discussion:

• Conduct QA checks on each State inventory;

• Prepare a QA Summary Report for submittal to the ag ency for review;

• Revise the inventory to resolve QA issues as direct ed by the agency;

• Repeat the QA checks on the revised inventory to ve rify that the corrections were completed;

## 35

• Perform augmentation to correct for missing data; a nd

• Repeat the QA checks to verify that the augmentatio n was completed correctly.

a. QA checks for State emission inventories

The following QA checks were run on each State inve ntory:

i. County and SCC coverage ii. Pollutant coverage iii. EPA QA summaries sent to State agencies iv. Range errors v. PM emissions consistency and completeness review vi. Control device type and control efficiency data review

vii. Start and end date checks viii. Annual and daily emissions comparison County and SCC Coverage

The county coverage in the State inventories appear ed to be reasonable for all States. The SCC coverage was difficult to evaluate simply by showin g a count of the number of SCCs by State. Each State inventory was compared to the preliminar y 2002 NEI, and area source categories in the NEI but not in a State inventory were sent to e ach agency for review. Each State agency then selected the NEI categories that were then added to the MANE-VU inventory.

Pollutant Coverage

The pollutant coverage in the State inventories was complete for all pollutants except for PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## . Diagnosis and resolution of PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## pollutant emissions is discussed later in section III.A.2.c. The exception was Connecticut w ho included only VOC, NO

x 

## , and CO emissions in its inventory submittal to EPA.

EPA QA Summaries Sent to State Agencies

Under a separate project with EPA, Pechan performed QA review of the State area source inventories. This QA review involved running EPA’s QA program on each data set to identify and resolve QA issues. Using the results of this Q A work, Pechan prepared two sets of QA summaries that EPA sent to the State agencies. Pec han contacted each State agency with QA issues identified in the EPA reports to obtain dire ction for correcting the QA issues identified in the reports. The following explains these two summ aries:

## 36

High-level Summary of State Inventories Submitted t o EPA:

The first summary was an Excel workbook file with f our spreadsheets that provided the following information:

• 2002 Nonpoint File Names: This spreadsheet documen ted names and formats of the files that EPA received from the State agencies and the dates on which they were

transferred to Pechan.

• 2002 Nonpoint Summary: This spreadsheet documented the name of the state agency, type of inventory (i.e., CAP, HAP, or both) , a comparison of the number of the counties in the inventory to the total number o f counties in the State to identify the geographic coverage of the inventory, a unique list of CAP codes, and the total number of area source SCCs. This spreadsheet also indicated if any nonroad or onroad emissions data were moved from the agency’s area source inventory to its nonroad or onroad inventory.

• 2002 Nonpoint Emission Sums: This spreadsheet summ arized emissions by start date, end date, and emission type and assigned the appropriate code to the emission type period NIF plus field.

• 2002 Nonpoint Error Summary: This spreadsheet prov ided a copy of the “SummaryStats” table from the EPA QA program (EPA, 2004a). This table provided the count of records for each NIF 3.0 tabl e and identified the number of records with errors by type of error.

Detailed Summary of QA Issues:

This summary (sent to State agencies on August 11) was prepared in a text file that listed by

State and NIF table the number of records with erro rs, and provided corrections for the errors. To support documentation of corrections to some of the errors in the text file, Pechan prepared

an Excel workbook file that summarized the followin g errors and corrections by State: invalid pollutants codes; invalid units; invalid maximum ac hievable control technology (MACT) codes; and invalid and inactive SCCs. A spreadsheet was a lso included to show the mapping of standard industrial classification (SIC) codes to N orth American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes. This crosswalk was used to correct invalid NAICS codes if a valid SIC code

was available in the State inventories and vice ver sa.

## 37

Additional QA for the MANE-VU Area Source Inventory

The following explains additional QA and data track ing that was performed for the MANE-VU inventory. The following data elements were review ed to identify QA issues:

• Range Errors;

• PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness;

• Control Device Codes and Control Efficiency Values;

• Start and End Dates;

• Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison; and

• Comparison of State Inventories to the 2002 Prelimi nary NEI.

For each State inventory for which QA issues were i dentified, a separate QA Summary Report was prepared in an Excel workbook file, and sent to each State agency for review. The State agencies provided directions in the Excel Workbook file, via e-mail, or by submitting revised

records in NIF 3.0 in an Access database to correct the inventories. The QA reports are

discussed under section III.A.2.b.

Range Errors

The EPA’s QA program contains routines that compare annual emission values, numeric fields in the PE and EP tables, and other temporal numeric fields against a range of values. The QA program flags records that are less than or greater than the range of values for review. Pechan summarized the range errors for the State agencies to review and provide corrections. According to EPA, the ranges to which values in inventories a re compared represent “normal” ranges that are based on percentiles from previous inventories. The range values are conservative in that EPA wants to identify suspicious values even though the values may be real (Thompson, 2002).

PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness Review

The following consistency checks were performed at the EM table data key level (for annual emissions) to compare PM emissions:

• If an SCC was associated with a PM emission record, but was missing one or more of the following (as appropriate for the SCC [i.e., PM -CON is associated with fuel combustion only]): PM10-FIL, PM10-PRI, PM25-FIL, P M25-PRI, or PM-CON, the record was flagged for review.

• The following equations were used to determine cons istency:

PM10-FIL + PM-CON = PM10-PRI

PM25-FIL + PM-CON = PM25-PRI

## 38

• The following comparisons were made to determine co nsistency:

PM10-PRI >= PM10-FIL

PM25-PRI >= PM25-FIL

PM10-PRI >= PM-CON

PM25-PRI >= PM-CON

PM10-FIL >= PM25-FIL

PM10-PRI >= PM25-PRI

If the data failed one of these checks it was diagn osed as an error. If a State agency did not provide corrections to these errors, the errors wer e corrected/filled in according to an augmentation procedure explained in section III.A.2 .c.

For information purposes, all PM-PRI and PM-FIL rec ords were flagged to indicate that these pollutants were included instead of, or in addition to, the standard PM10-PRI/FIL, PM25- PRI/FIL, and PM-CON pollutants.

Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data Rev iew

The CE codes in the “Primary Device Type Code” and “Secondary Device Type Code” fields were reviewed to identify invalid codes (i.e., code s that did not exist in the NIF 3.0 reference table) and missing codes (e.g., records with a null or uncontrolled code of 000 but with control efficiency data).

QA review of control efficiency data involved diagn osis of two types of errors. First, records were reviewed to identify control efficiency values that were reported as a decimal rather than as a percent value. Records with control efficiencies with decimal values were flagged as a potential error (although not necessarily an error, since the real control efficiency may be less than 1%). Records with a 1% control efficiency val ue were also identified for review by the State agency to determine if the value was reported as a decimal in its internal data system but

rounded to 1% when the data were converted to NIF 3 .0.

The second check identified records where 100% cont rol was reported in the CE table, but the emissions in the EM table were greater than zero an d the rule effectiveness value in the EM table was null, zero, or 100% (implying 100% control of e missions). Because many agencies did not populate the rule effectiveness field or a default value of zero was assigned, records with null or

zero rule effectiveness values were included where the CE was 100% and emissions were greater than zero. For records that met these criteria, Pe chan consulted with the State agency to determine if corrections were needed to any of the fields.

Start and End Date Checks

QA review was conducted to identify start and end d ate values in the PE and EM tables to confirm consistency with the inventory year in the TR table, and to confirm that the end date reported was greater than the start date reported.

## 39

Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison

The State inventories were reviewed to determine if any of the following conditions existed:

• Multiple records coded at the SCC level as emission type 30, but with different start and end dates. While not a true duplicate, this ma y indicate an error or inclusion of

both annual and seasonal values.

• Multiple records coded at the SCC level as a daily emission type (27, 29, etc.) but

with different start and end dates. While not a tr ue duplicate, this may indicate an error or just inclusion of additional types of dail y emissions.

• Multiple records coded at the SCC level with the sa me start and end date, but different emission types. While not a true duplica te, this may indicate an error or just inclusion of additional types of daily emissio ns.

• Any “DAILY” type record that was missing its associ ated “ANNUAL” record was flagged for review.

• Any “DAILY” type record that was greater than its a ssociated “ANNUAL” record was flagged for review.

b. Responses from State Agencies

QA Summary Reports were sent to the State agencies to review the QA issues identified. The State agencies were asked to return these reports t o MANE-VU with their corrections documented in the reports. These reports were then used to document revisions to the State inventories. The QA Summary Reports containing the revisions provided by the State agencies are provided in Excel Workbook files with this TSD.

c. Gap Filling and Augmentation

This section explains the methods used to add data for categories and/or pollutants missing in a State’s inventory after revising the inventory to a ddress QA issues.

i. MANE-VU sponsored inventories ii. PM augmentation

iii. Fossil fuel combustion sources

iv. Other sources of PM emissions v. Merging of NEI data into S/L inventories vi. Revisions to the preliminary 2002 NEI incorpora ted into Version 1 of the MANE-VU inventory

vii. Additional work on Area source methods - Fugitive Dust Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Ro ads - Wildfires and Prescribed Burning

## 40

The following discusses the augmentation procedures that were applied to the State inventories to improve the inventories or to fill in missing da ta not supplied by the State agencies.

MANE-VU -Sponsored Inventories

MANE-VU sponsored inventory development for residen tial wood combustion, open burning, public owned treatment works (POTWs), compositing, and industrial refrigeration. At the beginning of the project for developing Version 1, each State agency was requested to indicate if it (1) included the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory for one or more of these categories in the inventory it submitted to EPA; (2) included its own estimates for a category in the inventory it submitted to EPA; or (3) if it did not include a ca tegory in its inventory, if the MANE-VUsponsored inventory or the 2002 preliminary NEI sho uld be used as the source of data for the category. The results of this Version 1 inventory development request are summarized in Table

III-1.

Improvements to fugitive dust emissions for the pav ed and unpaved road categories were completed after the draft version of the consolidat ed area source inventory was prepared. Agencies provided guidance on if they wanted the MA NE-VU-sponsored inventory for these two categories to replace the paved and unpaved road in ventories they had included in their inventories. For paved roads, all States requested that the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory be used; however, New Jersey and Maryland requested th at the winter-time sand/silt adjustment not be included in their inventories. For unpaved road s, nine of the 12 States requested that the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory be used. New Jersey re quested that its unpaved road inventory be used instead of the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory. In addition, the District of Columbia and Delaware do not have any unpaved road activity and excluded this category from their

inventories.

PM Augmentation

Procedures were developed to estimate missing pollu tant data from data provided by the State agencies in order to develop a complete set of PM10 -PRI and PM25-PRI emissions to support air quality modeling. The following discusses the proc edures for fossil fuel combustion sources first followed by the procedures for all other area sourc es of PM emissions.

Fossil Fuel Combustion Sources

Fossil fuel combustion sources include industrial, commercial/institutional, and residential anthracite coal, bituminous/subbituminous coal, dis tillate oil and kerosene, residual oil, natural gas, and LPG. All of these sources emit both filte rable and condensible emissions. The QA

review of the PM emissions data for these sources f ocused on verifying that the emissions reported in the State inventories included both fil terable and condensible emissions. The emissions for these pollutants can be reported in S tate inventories individually (i.e., as filterable and condensible separately) or as primary emissions (i.e., the sum of the filterable and condensible emissions). The QA review also focused on evaluating the emission factors reported in the State inventories to determine if they were reasonable.41Table III-1. Summary of MANE-VU-Sponsored Inventories Included in Version 1 of the AreaSource Consolidated Emissions InventoryMANE-VU Inventory Included inState’s Inventory Submitted toEPANot Included in State’sInventory - Add to MANE-VUInventoryState’s Inventory Includes StateDeveloped EstimatesNot Included in State’sInventory - Add 2002Preliminary NEI Data toState’s InventoryArea SourceCategory Pollutant SCCsAnnualSummerDayWinterDay AnnualSummerDayWinterDay AnnualSummerDayWinterDay AnnualPOTWsNH3,VOC 2630020010(WastewaterTreatment)DE, NJ, PADE, NJ, PAVT VTCT, DC, DE,MA, MD, NH,NJ, NYCT, DC, DE,MA, MD, NH,NJNJ ME, RI2630020020(BiosolidsProcesses)DE, NJ, PADE, NJ, PAVT VTCT, DC, DE,MA, MD, NH,NJ, NYCT, DC, DE,MA, MD, NH,NJNJ ME, RI2630050000(Digested Sludge)DE, NH,NJ, PADE, NH, NJ,PAVT VTCT, DC, DE,MA, MD, NYCT, DC, DE,MA, MDME, RICompostingNH3,VOC 2680001000(Biosolids)NH, NJ NH, NJCT, DC,MA, ME,PA, VTCT, DC, MA,ME, PA, VT2680002000(Mixed Biosolids andGreen Waste)NH, NJ NH, NJCT, DC,MA, ME,PA, VTCT, DC, MA,ME, PA, VT2680003000(Composting; GreenWaste)DC, MA,MEDC, MA, MEIndustrialRefrigerationNH32399010000 ME, NH,NJME, NH, NJCT, MA,PA, VTCT, MA, PA,VT2104008000(Indoor)MA, MD,NHMA, MD,NHMA, MD,NHCT, DE,MECT, DE, MECT, DE,MENJ, NY, VT NJ NJ DC, PA, RIResidentialWoodCombustionAll criteriapollutants/precursors, andmany toxic airpollutants2104008070(Outdoor)MA, MD,NHMA, MD,NHMA, MD,NHCT, DE,MECT, DE, MECT, DE,ME2610000100(Leaves)MA, MD,NH, PADC, DE,NY, VTNJ NJ NJ ME, RI2610000400(Brush)MA, MD,PACT, DC,DE, NY, VTNJ NJ NJ ME, NH, RI2610030000(Municipal SolidWaste)MA, MD,PADC, DE,NYNH, NJ NH, NJ NJ ME, RI, VTOpen BurningAll criteriapollutants/precursors, andmany toxic airpollutants2610040400(Municipal YardWaste)MA, NY,PADC, NY,VTDE, NJ DE, NJ DE, NJTable III-1 (continued)42Notes:Gray shading identifies categories for which dailyemissions are not available.POTWs:CT, MD: Provided VOC but not NH3emissions in its State inventory.DC, MA, MD, ME, NH, RI: Reported POTW emissions under SCC 2630020000 (Total Processed).DE: MANE-VU inventory used for NH3; DE provided its own VOC emissions under SCC 2630020000 (Total Processed).NJ: MANE-VU-sponsored inventory used for NH3only. NJ included its own inventory for the othercriteria pollutants under SCCs 2630010000 and 2630020000.NY: Reported VOC emissions under SCC 2630000000 (from the preliminary 2002 NEI) and SCC 2630020000 (State-developed inventory). MANE-VU-sponsored NH3inventory was not used.Composting:CT, NH: SCC 2680003000 is not in the MANE-VU-sponsored composting inventory for these States.DE: This State does not have composting activity.MD: State requested that the MANE-VU inventory forthis category not be included in its inventory.NY, RI: Did not include emissions for this category in the 2002 inventory.Industrial Refrigeration:DC: Requested that the preliminary 2002 NEI be used but the NEI does not contain any emissions for this category in DC.DE: State-developed emissions are included in point source inventory.MD, RI: Did not include emissions for this category in its inventory.ME: Used the MANE-VU inventory emissions under SCC2302080002 (Miscellaneous Food and Kindred Products/Refrigeration).NH: Original inventory submittal to EPA includes SO2and PM emissions for SCC 2399000000 from the preliminary 2002 NEI; NH3emissions for SCC 2399010000 are from the MANE-VUinventory.NY: Original inventory submittal to EPA includes SO2and PM emissions for SCC 2399000000 from the preliminary 2002 NEI; NY did not use the MANE-VU-sponsored NH3inventory for SCC2399010000.Residential Wood Combustion:DC: RWC inventory in 2002 NEI covers seven SCCs and does not include daily emissions.Open Burning:CT: Statewide activity for SCC 2610000100 (Leaves)and SCC 2610030000 (Municipal Solid Waste) is negligible.For SCCs 2610000400 (Brush) and 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Waste), State initially provided VOC, NOx, and CO emissions under SCC 2610000000 which is nolonger a valid SCC in EPA’smaster SCC list. CT recalculated emissions to include VOC, NOx, CO, PM10-PRI/-FIL, and PM25-PRI/-FIL, and placedthe emissions on valid SCC 2610000500 (Land Clearing Debris)since the majority of the activity is associated with activities covered by this SCC.MD: The MANE-VU inventory for SCC 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Waste) reports zero emissions indicatingthat the activity for the category does not occur in MD. MD did not include the SCC in itsinventory for this reason.NH: Did not include NH3emissions in MANE-VU inventory for SCC 2610040400(Municipal Yard Waste).

## 43

To support the QA review effort, the uncontrolled P M emission factors shown in Table III-2 were compiled from AP-42. The emission factors rep orted in the State inventories were compared to the emission factors in this table. Em ission factors that appeared too high or too low were flagged for review by the State agency. I n addition, inventory data were flagged for review by the State agency if the emissions were re ported under the primary PM pollutant codes

but the emission factors matched with the emission factors for filterable PM in Table III-2. Finally, if emission factors were not reported in t he State agency inventory, the emission factors were back-calculated using the throughput data (if available), emissions, rule effectiveness values, and control efficiency data (if available). The back-calculated emission factors were compared to the factors in Table III-2 to identify data with major difference between the factors. It is emphasized that the uncontrolled emission fac tors in Table III-2 were used as a reference for reviewing State inventory data. The emission facto rs in this table should not be construed to be the best available for all State agencies since the emission factors will vary depending on the composition of the boiler population in an agency’s area source inventory.

Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Hampshire, N ew Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania provided their own inventory for all fossil fuel co mbustion categories. Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont used fossil fuel combustion inventory data in the preliminary 2002 NEI for some or all of the cat egories. The following provides details on the origin of the fossil fuel combustion inventories fo r these States:

Connecticut supplied VOC, NO

x 

## , and CO emissions from its 1999 inventory for indu strial

and commercial/institutional fossil fuel combustion . PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, SO 2 

## , and

NH 3 

## emissions were taken from preliminary NEI estimate s (carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI). For the residential se ctor, Connecticut’s inventory was taken from the preliminary 2002 NEI. Connecticut provide d guidance on the counties with natural gas and LPG activity for which to use the N EI estimates.

For the District of Columbia, the preliminary NEI w as used to gap fill missing PM10-PRI

and PM25-PRI emissions for commercial/institutional bituminous/ subbituminous coal combustion and PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, SO 2 

## , and NH 3 

## for commercial/institutional natural gas combustion. The NEI estimates for these commer cial/institutional categories were

carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI. Th e District of Columbia used the NEI

estimates for residential bituminous/subbituminous coal combustion.

Maine and Rhode Island used the preliminary 2002 NE I for all three sectors. The NEI

estimates for the industrial and commercial/institu tional sectors were carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI, while the residential se ctor estimates are based on 2000 or 2002 activity estimates prepared by EPA.

Vermont used the preliminary 2002 NEI for the indus trial and commercial/ institutional sectors and residential anthracite coal (carried fo rward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI), but provided its own inventory for residential dist illate oil, natural gas, and LPG.44Table III-2. Area Source Industrial, Commercial/Institutional, and Residential Fossil Fuel CombustionUncontrolled Emission Factors for PM10-PRI/FIL, PM25-PRI/FIL, and PM-CONPollutant1UncontrolledEmission Factor(EF) EF Numerator EF DenominatorCalculatedUncontrolled EFReferenceIndustrial Boilers: Anthracite Coal (SCC 2102001000)PM10-FIL 2.3 x % Ash contentof coalLB TON 30.77 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula of 2.3 * % Ash Content(13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002.PM25-FIL 0.6 x % Ash contentof coalLB TON 8.03 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula of 0.6 * % Ash Content(13.38%) (used Commercial/Institutional emission factors). Reference for ashcontent is EPA, 2002.PM-CON 0.08 x % Ashcontent of coalLB TON 1.07 AP-42 Table 1.2-3 Used formula for SCC10300101, EF calculated fromformula of .08 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Referencefor ash content is EPA,2002.PM10-PRI LB TON 31.84PM25-PRI LB TON 9.10Industrial Boilers: Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal (SCC 2102002000)PM10-FIL 13.2 LB TON 13.2 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EF (used Commercial/Institutional emission factors)PM25-FIL 4.6 LB TON 4.6 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EF (usedCommercial/Institutional emission factors)PM-CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP-42 Table 1.1-5 (used Commercial/Institutional emission factors)PM10-PRI LB TON 14.24PM25-PRI LB TON 5.64Industrial Boilers and IC Engines: Distillate Oil (SCC 2102004000)PM10-FIL 1 LB E3GAL 1 AP-42 Table 1.3-6PM25-FIL 0.25 LB E3GAL 0.25 AP-42 Table 1.3-6PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.30PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 1.55Industrial Boilers: Residual Oil (SCC 2102005000)PM10-FIL 7.17 x % Sulfurcontent of oilLB E3GAL 10.683 AP-42 Table 1.3-5. EF calculated from formula of 7.17(A); whereA=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios.PM25-FIL 4.67 x % Sulfurcontent of oilLB E3GAL 6.958 AP-42 Table 1.3-5. EF calculated from formula of 7.17(A); whereA=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios.PM-CON 1.5 LB E3GAL 1.5 AP-42 Table 1.3-2PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 12.18PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 8.46Industrial Boilers and IC Engines: Natural Gas (SCC2102006000)PM10-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM25-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM-CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM10-PRI 7.6 LB E6FT3 7.60PM25-PRI 7.6 LB E6FT3 7.60Table III-2 (continued)45Pollutant1UncontrolledEmission Factor(EF) EF Numerator EF DenominatorCalculatedUncontrolled EFReferenceIndustrial Boilers - Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2102007000)PM10-FIL 0.6 LB E3GAL 0.6 AP-42 Table 1.5-1PM25-FIL 0.6 LB E3GAL 0.6 AP-42 Table 1.5-1PM-CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM-CONemission factor of 5.7 lb/Million Cubic Feet (forallPM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0.0887 to convert emissionfactor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas tolb/1,000 gallons of propane.Reference: AP-42, Table 1.4-2. Conversion factorassumes 1020 Btu/scf fornatural gas (AP-42, Table 1.4-2) and 90,500 Btu/gallon for propane (AP-42,Appendix A, page A-5).PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 1.11PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 1.11Industrial Boilers: Kerosene (SCC 2102011000)PM10-FIL 1 LB E3GAL 1 AP-42 Table 1.3-6PM25-FIL 0.25 LB E3GAL 0.25 AP-42 Table 1.3-6PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-6PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.30PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 1.55Commercial/Institutional Heating: Anthracite Coal(SCC 2103001000)PM10-FIL 2.3 x % Ash contentof coalLB TON 30.77 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula of 2.3 * % Ash Content(13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002.PM25-FIL 0.6 x % Ash contentof coalLB TON 8.03 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula of 0.6 * % Ash Content(13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002.PM-CON 0.08 x % Ashcontent of coalLB TON 1.07 AP-42 Table 1.2-3 Used formula for SCC10300101, EF calculated fromformula of 0.08 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA,2002.PM10-PRI LB TON 31.84PM25-PRI LB TON 9.10Commercial/Institutional Heating: Bituminous and Lignite (SCC 2103002000)PM10-FIL 13.2 LB TON 13.2 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EFPM25-FIL 4.6 LB TON 4.6 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EFPM-CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP-42 Table 1.1-5 (0.04 lb/MMBtu * 26MMBtu/ton=1.04)PM10-PRI LB TON 14.24PM25-PRI LB TON 5.64Commercial/Institutional Heating: Distillate Oil (SCC 2103004000)PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.13Table III-2 (continued)46Pollutant1UncontrolledEmission Factor(EF) EF Numerator EF DenominatorCalculatedUncontrolled EFReferenceCommercial/Institutional Heating: Residual Oil (SCC 2103005000)PM10-FIL 5.17 x % Sulfurcontent of oilLB E3GAL 7.703 AP-42 Table 1.3-7. EF calculated from formula of 5.17(A); whereA=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios.PM25-FIL 1.92 x % Sulfurcontent of oilLB E3GAL 2.861 AP-42 Table 1.3-7. EF calculated from formula of 5.17(A); whereA=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios.PM-CON 1.5 LB E3GAL 1.5 AP-42, Table 1.3-2PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 9.20PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 4.36Commercial/Institutional Heating: Natural Gas (SCC2103006000)PM10-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM25-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM-CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM10-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60PM25-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60Commercial/Institutional Heating: Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2103007000)PM10-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Propane for Commercial Boilers)PM25-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Propane for Commercial Boilers)PM-CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM-CONemission factor of 5.7 lb/Million Cubic Feet (forallPM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0.0887 to convert emissionfactor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas tolb/1,000 gallons of propane.Reference: AP-42, Table 1.4-2. Conversion factorassumes 1020 Btu/scf fornatural gas (AP-42, Table 1.4-2) and 90,500 Btu/gallon for propane (AP-42,Appendix A, page A-5).PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91Commercial/Institutional Heating: Kerosene (SCC 2103011000)PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 UsedEF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 UsedEF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.13Residential Heating: Anthracite Coal (SCC 2104001000)PM10-FIL 10 LB TON 10 EPA, 2002.PM25-FIL 0.6 x % Ash contentof coalLB TON 8.03 EF calculated from formula of 0.6 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference forEF and ash content is EPA, 2002.PM-CON 0.08 x % Ashcontent of coalLB TON 1.07 EF calculated from formula of 0.08 * %Ash Content (13.38%). Reference forEF and ash content is EPA, 2002.PM10-PRI LB TON 11.07PM25-PRI LB TON 9.10Table III-2 (continued)47Pollutant1UncontrolledEmission Factor(EF) EF Numerator EF DenominatorCalculatedUncontrolled EFReferenceResidential Heating: Bituminous and Lignite Coal (SCC 2104002000)PM10-FIL 6.2 LB TON 6.2 AP-42 Table 1.1-11PM25-FIL 3.8 LB TON 3.8 AP-42 Table 1.1-11PM-CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP-42 Table 1.1-5 (0.04 lb/MMBtu * 26 MMBtu/ton=1.04)PM10-PRI LB TON 7.24PM25-PRI LB TON 4.84Residential Heating: Distillate Oil (SCC 2104004000)PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 (Commercial/Institutional EF)PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 (Commercial/Institutional EF)PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.13Residential Heating: Natural Gas - All types (SCC 2104006000)PM10-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4.2PM25-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4.2PM-CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP-42 Table 1.4.2PM10-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60PM25-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60Residential Heating: Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2104007000)PM10-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Same factor used for Propane for Commercial Boilers;based on EIIP)PM25-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Same factor used for Propane for Commercial Boilers;based on EIIP)PM-CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM-CONemission factor of 5.7 lb/Million Cubic Feet (forallPM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0.0887 to convert emissionfactor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas tolb/1,000 gallons of propane.Reference: AP-42, Table 1.4-2. Conversion factorassumes 1020 Btu/scf fornatural gas (AP-42, Table 1.4-2) and 90,500 Btu/gallon for propane (AP-42,Appendix A, page A-5).PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91Residential Heating: Kerosene (SCC 2104011000)PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 UsedEF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 UsedEF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.131 PM10-PRI EF = sum of PM10-FIL and PM-CON emission factors; PM25-PRI EF = sum of PM25-FIL and PM-CONemission factors.

## 48

Revisions to the NEI for residential LPG and kerose ne were completed after the preliminary 2002 NEI was released in February 2004. Connecticu t, the District of Columbia, Maine, and Rhode Island approved replacement of the preliminar y 2002 NEI estimates with the revised estimates for LPG. Connecticut was the only State that elected to use the NEI for the residential kerosene category, and Connecticut approved replaci ng the preliminary 2002 NEI for this category with the revised inventory prepared by EPA

.

Other Sources of PM Emissions

For States that provided only PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL emissions, PM10-PRI emissions were set equal to PM10-FIL emissions and PM25-PRI emissi ons were set equal to PM25-FIL

emissions. The PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions tha t were added to the inventory were assigned a data source code of S-02-X-PR where S-02 -X represents the code assigned to the PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL emissions provided by the Sta te agency and the “-PR” indicates that the ratio was applied to estimate the primary emiss ions (in this case, the ratio of primary to filterable emissions is “1”).

PM25-PRI emissions missing from State inventories w ere estimated by applying a ratio of

PM25-PRI-to-PM10-PRI emissions to the PM10-PRI emis sions provided by the State agency. Table III-3 identifies the agencies with SCCs for w hich ratios were applied to estimate PM25-

PRI emissions. This table also shows the ratios an d the reference for the ratios.

## 49

Table III-3. SCCs for which PM25-PRI Emissions wer e Estimated by Applying a

Ratio to the PM10-PRI Emissions in the State invent ory

SCC SCC Description Agency Ratio of

PM25-

PRI to

PM10-
PRI Reference

2309100010 Industrial Processes: Fabricated Metals:

SIC 34: Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services: Electroplating NY 0.947 AP-42 emission factors for hard chrome plating tank controlled with mist eliminator. AP-42 (Table 12.20-3)
shows 94.7% of total PM as less than 2.35 micrometers. Applied factor to State-supplied PM10-PRI emissions to

estimate PM25-PRI emissions.

2461023000 Solvent Utilization: Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Commercial: Asphalt Roofing: Total: All Solvent Types MA 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI equals PM10-PRI.

2601000000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery:

On-site Incineration: All Categories: Total MD, NH 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI equals PM10-PRI.

2610000100 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery:

On-site Incineration: All Categories: Yard Waste - Leaf Species Unspecified NH 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI equals PM10-PRI.

2810001000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other

Combustion: Forest Wildfires: Total MD 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI equals PM10-PRI.

2810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other

Combustion: Prescribed Burning for Forest Management: Total MD 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI equals PM10-PRI.

2810020000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other

Combustion: Prescribed Burning of Rangeland: Total MD 0.86 Based on ratio of PM25-PRI to PM10- PRI for same SCC used by States in

2002 NEI.

2810030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other

Combustion: Structure Fires: Total MD, NH 0.91 NEI Method.

2810050000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other

Combustion: Motor Vehicle Fires: Total MD, NH 0.91 NEI Method.



## d. 2002 NEI

Merging of NEI Data into State Inventories

The area source inventory provided by each State ag ency was compared to the 2002 NEI to identify categories in the NEI that were not in eac h State inventory. The list of categories identified was provided to each State agency and ea ch agency then selected the NEI categories to be added to its inventory. Identification of categ ories included in the 2002 NEI but not in a State inventory involved a two-step process. First, Pech an identified the categories in the NEI that did not have an electronic match on the data key of the EM table between the State inventory and the NEI. Then, Pechan manually compared the NEI catego ries without an electronic match to the State inventory to identify and eliminate NEI categ ories that were in the State inventory but had a different SCC. For example, a State inventory ma y use a general SCC for a category while the NEI may use different SCCs to breakout emissions at a finer detail. Examples of categories where this typically occurred include the residenti al wood combustion, open burning of land clearing debris, solvent utilization, and petroleum marketing and transportation categories. In

## 50

addition, if a State agency requested that a MANE-V U-sponsored inventory be added to its inventory, the NEI categories that overlapped with the MANE-VU -sponsored categories were removed from the list of NEI categories considered for incorporation into a State inventory.

The source categories in the 2002 NEI that were add ed to a State inventory can be identified

where the data source code starts with “E”. These categories can be identified using the data

source code field in the NIF 3.0 files or in the su mmary of area source emissions that contains

the data source code.

Revisions to the Preliminary 2002 NEI

During preparation of the MANE-VU inventory, EPA co mpleted revisions to the emissions for six categories in the preliminary 2002 NEI released in February 2004. As agreed to with each State agency, the revised emissions were used in th e MANE-VU inventory in lieu of the preliminary 2002 NEI emissions if the agency reques ted that the category be included.

• Non-Residential Construction (SCC 2311020000): 200 2 emissions data replaced data in preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forw ard from 1999 NEI.

• Highway Construction (SCC 2311030000): 2002 emissi ons data replaced data in preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI.

• Open Burning of Land Clearing Debris (SCC 261000050 0): 2002 emissions data replaced data in preliminary 2002 NEI that were car ried forward from 1999 NEI. The activity for this category was based on activit y prepared for the non-residential and highway construction categories. For 2002, emi ssions were set to zero for counties with a population that was 80% urban or mo re based on 2000 Census data.

This was not done for the 1999 NEI. For the NEI me thod, it was assumed that highly urban counties do not allow this activity to take place. Note that 2002 emissions data were already included in the prelimi nary 2002 NEI for the open burning of residential municipal solid waste, open burning of yard waste, and the residential construction categories.

• Residential LPG Combustion (SCC 2104007000): 2000 emissions data replaced data in the preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI.

• Residential Kerosene Combustion (SCC 2104011000): 2000 emissions data replaced data in the preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999

NEI.

• Residential Wood Combustion (SCCs starting with 210 4008xxx; 4 SCCs for fireplaces and 3 SCCs for woodstoves): The prelimi nary 2002 NEI emissions were

revised to:

## 51 • Correct the CO, PM10-PRI, and PM25-PRI emission fac tors for fireplaces without inserts (this change doubled the emission f actors associated with correcting an error in converting the values from g /kg to lb/ton);

• Correct the climate zone map for allocating nationa l activity to States;

• Replace 1997 total residential wood consumption wit h 2001 estimates (this change reduced wood consumption for fireplaces with inserts and woodstoves);

• Update urban/rural population data to reflect 2002 estimates based on year 2002 total county population and year 2000 county r atios of urban/rural population to total population; and

• Change the data source code from E-02-X (this was i ncorrect) to E-01-X to reflect 2001 activity data adjusted to 2002.

e. QA Review of Final Inventory

Final QA checks were run on the revised data set to ensure that all corrections provided by the State agencies were incorporated into the State inv entories and that there were no remaining QA issues that could be addressed during the duration of the project. After exporting the inventory in Oracle to an Access database in NIF 3.0, the EPA ’s QA program was run on the Access database and the QA output was reviewed to verify t hat all QA issues that could be addressed were resolved (EPA, 2004a).

The output file from the EPA’s QA program run on th e area source inventory is provided in an Access 2000 database along with the Access da tabase containing the area source inventory

in NIF 3.0.

Additional Work on Area Source Methods

• Fugitive Dust Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Road s

Review of Methods

This work involved compiling and summarizing inform ation on emission estimation methods and data sources from the MANE-VU State agencies, R POs, and EPA for the following fugitive dust area source categories: windblown dust, paved and unpaved roads, agricultural tiling and harvesting, and construction activities. A short s urvey form was prepared and sent to the MANE-VU State agencies to collect information on wh ether an agency had activity for each category during 2002. For each agency for which ac tivity occurred in its jurisdiction during 2002, information was requested on the methods and data sources it used to prepare its 2002 inventory for each category. This information was used to prioritize the categories (e.g., work on agricultural field burning was eliminated from furt her consideration if MANE-VU State agencies

## 52

did not have activity for this category). The meth ods and data applied by RPOs other than

MANE-VU were obtained from RPO websites and discuss ions with the RPOs.

The results of this review were documented in a tec hnical memorandum (MANE-VU, 2004b). Based on the results of the review, MANE-VU decided to proceed with developing a paved and unpaved road fugitive dust inventory that incorpora ted improvements to activity data used in the NEI methodology.

Methods for Improving Paved and Unpaved Road Fugiti ve Dust Inventory

Fugitive dust emissions from paved and unpaved road s are classified under SCCs 2294000000 and 2296000000, respectively. Fugitive dust emissi ons from paved and unpaved road traffic were estimated for PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, an d PM25-FIL. Since these categories are not sources of PM-CON, PM10-PRI emissions are e qual to PM10-FIL emissions and PM25- PRI emissions are equal to PM25-FIL. The following provides a summary of the methods.

Paved Roads

Several changes were made in the paved road fugitiv e dust emission calculations to improve these estimates over those prepared for EPA’s 2002 NEI. First, the monthly precipitation data representing the number of days in a month with at least 0.01 inches of precipitation were developed at the county level. In comparison, a si ngle monthly precipitation value was used to model an entire State in the 2002 NEI. Thus, the r esulting MANE-VU county-specific paved road fugitive dust emission estimates should be mor e representative of each county than the NEI data since precipitation events can vary significan tly from one part of the State to another.

The second improvement made to the paved road fugit ive dust emission calculations was the use of county and road-type-specific average vehicle we ights. This is an improvement over the NEI where a single average vehicle weight is applied na tionwide. Thus, in the MANE-VU inventory, county/road type combinations with significant heav y truck traffic have a higher average vehicle weight and a corresponding emission factor compared to county/road type combinations with primarily lighter vehicle traffic.

The final improvement made to the MANE-VU paved roa d emission calculations was the use of the winter silt loading adjustments. These adjustm ents account for the application of sand and salt on the roads during months with frozen precipi tation. The 2002 NEI does not include any wintertime silt loading adjustments. The effect of the wintertime silt loading adjustments is an increase in the paved road emission factors during the months in which it is applied. The months during which this adjustment was applied varied by State in the MANE-VU inventory.

Unpaved Roads

The county-specific precipitation data used in the paved road fugitive dust calculations were also used to improve the unpaved road fugitive dust calc ulations. As with the paved roads, this represents an improvement over the State-specific p recipitation data used in the 2002 NEI

## 53

unpaved road emission inventory. The other improve ment made to the unpaved roads was the use of State-supplied unpaved road mileage data by county for Maine.

• Wildfires and Prescribed Burning

Review of Methods

This work involved compiling and summarizing inform ation on emission estimation methods and data sources from the MANE-VU State agencies, R POs, and EPA for the following area source categories: wildfires, prescribed burning, slash burning, and agricultural field burning. The approach previously described for the fugitive dust categories was used to collect and compile data from the MANE-VU State agencies, RPOs other than MANE-VU, and EPA for the fire categories. All of the information collected from these various information sources was summarized in a technical memorandum (MANE-VU, 2004 c).

Results of Methods Review

MANE-VU recognized the need to improve the methods for estimating emissions for the fire categories. The most important revision would be t o inventory fire events as point sources rather than as area sources at the county-level. However, due to resource constraints, it was decided not to pursue improvements to the methods for estim ating emissions from the fire categories. It should be noted that during this project, some of t he MANE-VU States provided revisions to their wildfire and prescribed burning inventories t o add PM25-PRI emissions and to improve the spatial allocation of activity data at the county l evel. These improvements were incorporated into the MANE-VU area source inventory.

3. Version 3 Revisions

The following explains revisions to Version 3 that applied to several or all of the MANE-VU

States.

Gap Filling

In Version 2 of MANE-VU’s inventory, emissions for PFCs, industrial adhesives, and residential outdoor wood burning existed for some States but we re missing for other States. Since these are categories for which SIP rules may be developed, it was determined that emissions for these categories should be added to Version 3. The follo wing provides a summary of the Version 3 revisions to address missing data concerns for thes e categories:

• PFCs: MANE-VU estimated default 2002 emissions for these States using a per capita emission factor and county population data for each State. The derivation of the emission factor, population data, and calculation of annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs is provided in an Excel file named “PFC_Adhesive Calcs for 2002_022106.xls” along with

this TSD.

## 54

Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, R hode Island, and Vermont elected to use MANE-VU’s default inventory which was added to Version 3. Massachusetts elected to use the per capita emission factor but p rovided revisions to the population data, used 2002 owner occupied units to allocate the emis sions to counties, and then allocated emissions between the commercial (16%) and resident ial (84%) sectors. Massachusetts’ calculations are provided in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named MA_AR_QA_Report_030806.xls" provided wit h this TSD.

• Industrial Adhesives: Emissions for industrial adh esives were missing in Version 2 for Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Ma ryland, Massachusetts, and Rhode

Island. MANE-VU estimated default 2002 emissions f or these States using a per capita emission factor and county population data for each State. The derivation of the emission factor, population data, and calculation of annual and daily VOC emissions for industrial adhesives is provided in an Excel file named “PFC_A dhesive Calcs for 2002_022106.xls” along with this TWD.

Massachusetts elected to use MANE-VU’s gap-filling inventory which was added to

Version 3. The rest of the States elected to use E PA’s 2002 inventory which is based on a top-down, mass balance methodology where national industrial adhesive solvent estimates were allocated to counties using industri al employment. The EPA estimates were adjusted to remove uncontrolled VOC emissions included in the final 2002 point source NEI. The point-source adjustments were cond ucted at the county level. Note that the point-source-adjusted emissions for Rhode Islan d are zero for all three counties.

Note New Jersey is the only State that prepared its own 2002 inventory for this category

that is included in Version 3. The industrial adhe sive inventory data for the rest of the MANE-VU States originates from the 1999 NEI. These States were contacted to determine if they wanted the 1999 data replaced wit h the default estimates or with the EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives. Mai ne commented that the 1999

estimates are more realistic of the solvent emissio ns for their State than the 2002 NEI or

MANE-VU default estimates. The other States did no t indicate that they wanted their data replaced. Therefore, the 1999 NEI data for Ma ine, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont was not changed in Versio n 3 of MANE-VU’s inventory.

• Residential Wood Burning: Residential outdoor wood burning emissions were missing in Version 2 of the MANE-VU inventory for the District of Columbia, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. In Versions 1 and 2, New Jers ey’s and New York’s emissions for outdoor wood burning were included with their inven tory for indoor wood burning. The District of Columbia, Rhode Island, and Vermont ele cted to use MANE-VU’s outdoor wood burning inventory which was added to Version 3 . In addition, per direction provided by New Jersey, its wood burning inventory was replaced with the MANE-VUsponsored indoor wood burning inventory in Version 3, and the MANE-VU outdoor wood burning inventory was added to Version 3.

## 55

New York’s inventory in Version 2 included emission s for both residential indoor and outdoor wood burning. For Version 3, New York prov ided revisions that lowered its

overall emissions relative to Version 2 and broke o ut its inventory to show emissions for fireplaces, woodstoves, and outdoor equipment separ ately. New York also added NH 3 

## emissions to its inventory for Version 3.

Adjustments to PM 2.5 

## Emissions for Fugitive Dust Categories

Information developed by the Western Governors’ Ass ociation, Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Dust Emissions Joint Forum and E PA indicates that, for paved and unpaved roads and the construction nonpoint source categori es, the PM 2.5 

## -to-PM 10 

## ratio is lower than the

ratio used in the EPA method to estimate PM25-PRI/- FIL emissions from PM10-PRI/-FIL emissions (WRAP, 2005). Therefore, for the final 2 002 NEI, EPA applied an adjustment factor

to the PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions to correct for overe stimates of PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions for these categories. Because the PM 2.5 

## -to-PM 10 

## ratio used for the MANE-VU States is based on the EPA method, this information was communicated to th e MANE-VU States and all of the States agreed that these adjustments should be made to the MANE-VU inventory. Table III-4 identifies the categories to which this adjustment was applied , the old and new PM 2.5 

## -to-PM 10 

## ratios, and the adjustment factors applied to the PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions in Version 3 of MANE-VU’s inventory. Note that these adjustments to PM 2.5 

## emissions were applied prior to applying the transport adjustment factors for PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## emissions. The modelers applied the transport adjustment factors to the mass emissions in Version 3. Documentation of the file containing the transport adjustment factors is provided under “Spe ciation Profiles” section of Table VII-1 in Chapter VII.

For the construction categories, the EPA assumed an original PM 2.5 

## -to-PM 10 

## ratio of 0.15 and an adjustment factor of 0.67. However, the original P M 2.5 

## -to-PM 10 

## ratio used for both the NEI method and MANE-VU's inventory for construction is 0.2. Based on discussions with EPA, the goal is to revise the original PM 2.5 

## emissions such that the PM 2.5 

## -to-PM 10 

## ratio is 0.1. Therefore,

for Version 3 of MANE-VU's 2002 area source invento ry, an adjustment factor of 0.5 (ratio of 0.1-to-0.2) was applied to adjust the PM 2.5 

## emissions.

Note that based on Pechan’s discussions with EPA du ring the week of March 6, 2006 concerning the application of the paved road PM 2.5 

## adjustment factor, it was determined that adjustin g the emissions by applying the factor (shown in Table II I-4) to the PM 2.5 

## emissions is a simplistic approach. The EPA noted that it is evaluating this issue and will be issuing guidance in the near future for revising the equation for estimating PM 2.5 

## emissions which, when applied, will likely yield different results. Because EPA was unable to provide guidance on how to address this issue before Version 3 needed to be completed durin g the week of March 6, the adjustment factor shown in Table III-4 was applied to the PM 2.5 

## emissions for paved roads because this adjustment will provide a better estimate of PM 2.5 

## emissions than the unadjusted emissions.

## 56

Table III-4. Revisions to PM25-PRI and PM25-FIL Em issions for Paved and

Unpaved Roads and Construction

SCC SCC Description Original

PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 Ratio Revised

PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 Ratio Adjustment

Factor 1,2

2294000000 Mobile Sources : Paved Roads : All Paved Roads :

Total: Fugitives 0.25 0.15 0.6

2296000000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : All Unp aved

Roads : Total: Fugitives 0.15 0.1 0.67

2296005000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : Public Unpaved

Roads : Total: Fugitives 0.15 0.1 0.67

2296010000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : Industr ial

Unpaved Roads : Total: Fugitives 0.15 0.1 0.67

2311000000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

All Processes : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50

2311010000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Residential : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50

2311010040 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Residential : Ground Excavations 0.2 0.1 0.50

2311020000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50

2311020040 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional : Ground

Excavations 0.2 0.1 0.50

2311030000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Road Construction : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50

1 For these categories, filterable and primary emis sions are equal because they are not sources of co ndensible emissions. The adjustment factor was applied to both the PM25-PRI and PM25-FI L emissions and emission factors in the MANE-VU inv entory.

2 See text for discussion of issue concerning the a djustment factor for paved road PM 2.5 emissions. Also, for construction, see text for explanation of PM 2.5 adjustment factor shown in this table.



## Removal of Invalid CE Records

For the following SCCs, Version 2 contained invalid CE records for Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylva nia, Rhode Island, and Vermont that

were removed in Version 3:

SCC SCC Description

2311020000 Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : Industrial/ Commercial/Institutional : Total

2311030000 Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : Road Constr uction : Total 2610000100 Open Burning : All Categories : Yard Wa ste - Leaf Species Unspecified 2610000400 Open Burning : All Categories : Yard Wa ste - Brush Species Unspecified 2610030000 Open Burning : Residential : Household Waste



## The CE records all originate from the preliminary 2 002 NEI that have been removed from the final 2002 nonpoint NEI. They are invalid because they have a control efficiency value of 100% and corresponding records in the EM table with rule effectiveness and rule penetration values of 100% (implying that the emissions are zero), but wi th emissions greater than zero. The Excel spreadsheet file named “CE_records_removed from V3. xls” provides the CE records by State and county FIPS, SCC, and pollutant code that were removed in Version 3.

## 57 4. Version 3 Emissions Summary

Table III-5 presents a State-level summary of the a nnual area source emissions in Version 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. Note that PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions are included in the inventory for all SCCs for which State agencies reported any form of PM, PM 10 

## , and/or PM 2.5 

## emissions. If an agency did not report PM10-PRI an d/or PM25-PRI but reported PM-PRI, PMFIL, PM-CON, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL, the PM augm entation procedures discussed in the TSD were applied to the form of PM emissions suppli ed by the agency to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM emissions. If an agency repo rted PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI emissions but not PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, or PM-CON emissions, th e agency's inventory was not augmented to calculate filterable or condensible em issions. Note that PM-CON is associated with only fuel combustion sources.

For NH 3 

## , the area source inventory includes emissions for natural sources for the following States: SCCs 28060xxxxx for domestic cats and dogs in Delaware, Massachusetts, and New Jersey; 28070xxxxx for wild animals in Delaware, Ma ssachusetts, New Jersey, and New York; and SCC 2810010000 for human perspiration in Delawa re, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. The area source inventory also includes NH 3 

## biogenic emissions (SCC 2701420000) for

Massachusetts.

Table III-5. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Area Source Em issions by State (Tons/Year)

State CO NH 3 NO
x PM10-FIL PM10-

PRI PM25-

FIL PM25-

PRI PMCON SO 2 VOC

Connecticut 70,198 5,318 12,689 37,790 48,281 4,038 14,247 846 12,418 87,302

Delaware 14,052 13,279 2,608 12,910 13,039 3,075 3, 204 128 1,588 15,519

District of
Columbia 2,300 14 1,644 5,745 6,293 507 1,029 147 1,337 6,43 2

Maine 109,223 8,747 7,360 155,237 168,953 19,090 32 ,774 686 13,149 100,621

Maryland 141,178 25,834 15,678 31,116 95,060 3,375 27,318 611 12,393 120,254

Massachusetts 136,552 18,809 31,358 150,046 192,839 23,354 42,067 1,156 54,923 162,016

New Hampshire 79,647 2,158 10,960 32,138 43,328 6,688 17,532 449 7,072 65,370

New Jersey 97,657 17,572 26,692 37,282 61,601 2,811 19,350 476 10,744 167,882

New York 356,254 67,422 98,803 288,991 369,595 30,8 94 87,154 102 130,409 507,292

Pennsylvania 266,935 79,911 47,591 363,173 391,897 51,792 74,925 266 63,679 240,785

Rhode Island 8,007 883 3,886 7,090 8,295 887 2,064 336 4,557 31,402

Vermont 43,849 9,848 3,208 51,392 56,131 6,729 11,0 65 180 4,087 23,265

MANE-VU 1,325,853 249,795 262,477 1,172,909 1,455, 311 153,243 332,729 5,383 316,357 1,528,141

## 58

B. State-Specific Methods

For each of the MANE-VU States, this section identi fies the temporal basis of the emissions

included in Version 3 and discusses revisions incor porated into Version 3. In addition, this section also discusses the origin of each State age ncy’s emissions included in Version 3. For each agency, a table is provided in Appendix B that lists the data source codes by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant. In addition, an electr onic folder is provided for each State agency containing the QA Summary Reports prepared for Vers ions 1, 2, and/or 3 and other files documenting revisions included in Versions 2 and 3. Except for Rhode Island, a QA Summary Report was prepared for Version 1. Subsequently, a QA Summary Report was prepared for States that provided Version 2 or 3 revisions. Rho de Island elected to use EPA’s draft 2002 NEI for Versions 1 and 2 but provided revisions for Ver sion 3; therefore, a QA Summary Report is available for Version 3 only for Rhode Island.

1. Connecticut

Table III-6 shows the emission type periods for whi ch Connecticut provided emissions.

Table III-6. Connecticut 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29



## Table B-1 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. Connecticut provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3. Connecticut elected to use the EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives. Connecticut elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for th e following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor residential wood combustion;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes;

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs; and

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI. For Connecticut, these emissions are either based on 20 02 data prepared by EPA or carried forward

## 59

from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI. Data carried forward from the 1999 NEI originate from

either State data included in the 1999 NEI or EPA d ata developed for the 1999 NEI.

2. Delaware

Table III-7 shows the emission type periods for whi ch Delaware provided emissions.

Table III-7. Delaware 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20020831 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20020101 20020831 27

ANNUAL 20020512 20020512 30 DAILY 20020512 20020512 27

ANNUAL 20020629 20020629 30 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

ANNUAL 20021029 20021029 30 DAILY 20020629 20020629 27

ANNUAL 20021104 20021104 30 DAILY 20021029 20021029 27

ANNUAL 20021205 20021205 30 DAILY 20021104 20021104 27

DAILY 20021205 20021205 27



## Table B-2 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. Delaware provided 2002 emissions for the majority o f the area source categories in Version 3, and used 2002 data that EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI or MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the remaining categories. Delaware elected to use the EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives, and prepared its own inventor y for PFCs. Delaware elected to use data from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the followin g source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved roads (note: there are no unpaved roads in Delaware);

• Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for POTWs; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories.

## 60 3. District of Columbia

Table III-8 shows the emission type periods for whi ch the District of Columbia provided

emissions.

Table III-8. District of Columbia 2002 Area, Versi on 3:

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27



## Table B-3 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. The District of Columbia provided 2002 emissions fo r the majority of the area source categories in Version 3. The District of Columbia provided an nual VOC emissions for PFCs for Version 2 that were kept in Version 3. The District of Colum bia elected to use the EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives and indoor wood burning. The exception is for the following categories

for which the District of Columbia elected to use d ata from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved roads (note: there are no unpaved roads in the District o f Columbia);

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories.

4. Maine

Table III-9 shows the emission type periods for whi ch Maine provided emissions.

Table III-9. Maine 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29

DAILY 20020601 20020929 29

## 61

Table B-4 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than o ne SCC and emission type period combination. Maine provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3. Maine’s inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. Maine provided annual and daily VOC and annual NH 3 

## emissions for industrial wastewater treatment that were added to

Version 3. Maine elected to use data from MANE-VU- sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs; and

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting.

5. Maryland

Table III-10 shows the emission type periods for wh ich Maryland provided emissions. Table B5 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also s hows the number of counties by SCC.

Table III-10. Maryland 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30

SEASONAL 20020401 20020930 30 MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30

SEASONAL 20020401 20021031 30 MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30

SEASONAL 20020601 20020831 30 MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30

DAILY 20020101 20021231 29 MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30

DAILY 20020401 20020930 29 MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30

DAILY 20020401 20021031 29 MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30

MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30

MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30



## Maryland provided 2002 annual, seasonal, and daily emissions for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3 and used 2002 data that EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI for industrial adhesives and commercial cooking. Maryl and prepared its own inventory for PFCs.

Maryland elected to use data from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

## 62

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories; and

• Annual and monthly NH 3 

## emissions for agricultural crop fertilizers.

For Version 2, Maryland provided revisions to annua l, seasonal, and daily VOC emissions for SCC 2505030120 (Storage and Transport : Petroleum a nd Petroleum Product Transport : Truck : Gasoline). Maryland also removed PM10-FIL and PM25 -FIL annual, seasonal, and daily records for open burning of land clearing debris (S CC 2610000500). Maryland had revised the

PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions in an earlier versi on of the MANE-VU inventory but not the PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL. As a result of revising the primary emissions, the filterable emissions were no longer met the consistency check as compared to the primary emissions.

QA of PM emissions in Version 3 identified one reco rd for Maryland in county 510 for SCC 2801000003 (Agriculture - Crops : Tilling) where PM 10-PRI annual emissions are 2317.2 tons

and PM25-PRI annual emissions are 0 tons. For the other counties in Maryland with this SCC,

PM25-PRI emissions are about 20% of the PM10-PRI em issions. This issue was not addressed due to time and resource constraints for completing revisions to Version 3.

6. Massachusetts

Table III-11 shows the emission type periods for wh ich Massachusetts provided emissions.

Table III-11. Massachusetts 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29



## Table B-6 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Massachusetts provided 2002 annual and daily emissi ons for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3 and used 2002 data that EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI for residential coal combustion, asphalt roofing, and a gricultural livestock (NH 3 

## ).

## 63

Massachusetts elected to use data from MANE-VU-spon sored inventories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for industrial adhes ives and PFCs;

• Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes;

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories.

For Version 2, Massachusetts revised annual and sum mer day VOC emissions for 14 counties for the following categories: aircraft refueling, surface coating, degreasing, miscellaneous nonindustrial: consumer and commercial products and pe sticides, and gasoline service stations (stage 1: balanced submerged fill). Massachusetts also re vised annual and daily emissions for 14 counties for forest wildfires, revised annual emiss ions for four counties for residential open burning of brush using the correct rule penetration factors for the counties, and revised control efficiency and control device data for selected cat egories in the CE table.

For Version 3, Massachusetts revised annual and sum mer day VOC emissions for 14 counties for auto refinishing. In the CE table, Massachusetts c hanged control device code 102 (low-solvent coatings) to 000 (uncontrolled) and associated cont rol efficiency values were set to null for all

counties. Massachusetts also added annual and summ er day VOC emissions for 14 counties for gasoline service stations (stage 2: displacement lo ss/controlled).

For PFCs, Massachusetts elected to use the per capi ta emission factor but provided revisions to the population data, used 2002 owner occupied units to allocate the emissions to counties, and then allocated emissions between the commercial (16 %) and residential (84%) sectors. Massachusetts’ calculations are provided in the spr eadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named MA_AR_QA_Report_030806.xls".

7. New Hampshire

Table III-12 shows the emission type periods for wh ich New Hampshire provided emissions. Table B-7 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. New Hampshire provided 2002 emissions for many of t he area source categories in Version 3. New Hampshire’s inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI.

## 64 Table III-12. New Hampshire 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29

MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30

MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30

MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30

MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30

MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30

MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30

MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30

MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30

MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30

MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30

MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30

MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30



## New Hampshire elected to use data from MANE-VU-spon sored inventories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs;

• Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes a nd POTWs;

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting;

• Annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories; and

• Annual and monthly NH 3 

## emissions for agricultural crop fertilizers and li vestock.

Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI; these emissions are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forward from final

Version 3 of the 1999 NEI.

New Hampshire provided revisions to Version 2 that were kept in Version 3. For Version 2, New Hampshire revised annual and daily VOC emission s for the gasoline storage and transport

sector to reflect revisions it made to the 2002 inv entory that EPA prepared for the 2002 NEI. The categories revised include bulk plant breathing losses, gasoline service stations (stages 1 and 2 total and underground tank breathing and emptying losses), and gasoline tank trucks.

## 65 8. New Jersey

Table III-13 shows the emission type periods for wh ich New Jersey provided emissions.

Table III-13. New Jersey 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20011201 20020228 29

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29



## Table B-8 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. New Jersey provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories. New Jersey provided its own 2002 inventory for industrial adhe sives and PFCs. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 20 02 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forward from fi nal Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANEVU-sponsored inventories. New Jersey elected to us e MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor residential wood combustion (rep lacing New Jersey’s indoor residential wood combustion inventory provided in V ersions 1 and 2);

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved roads;

• Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes a nd POTWs; and

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting.

For Version 3, New Jersey added annual and summer d ay VOC emissions for 21 counties for SCC 2501060100 (gasoline service stations : stage 2 : total). The emissions are summarized in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named "NJ_AR_QA_Report_ 030806.xls". New Jersey provided 2002 emissions da ta for the industrial adhesives and PFC categories in Version 1. For Version 2, New Jersey corrected PM25-PRI emissions that were greater than PM10-PRI emissions for SCC 2601000000 (on-site incineration : all categories : total).

9. New York

Table III-14 shows the emission type periods for wh ich New York provided emissions. Table B9 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also s hows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because the

data source codes are different for more than one S CC and emission type period combination or

## 66

because emissions are not reported for all pollutan ts for the same SCC and emission type period

combination.

Table III-14. New York 2002 Area, Version 3:

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30

MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30

MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30

MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30

MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30

MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30

MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30

MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30

MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30

MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30

MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30

MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30



## New York provided revisions to annual emissions for all 62 counties for the categories and pollutants shown in Table III-15. This revision co mpletely replaced the 2002 emissions that New York provided in Version 2. Table III-15 also identifies categories and pollutants for which emissions were added to Version 3 (i.e., not in Ver sion 2). The emissions are summarized in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Exce l file named NY_AR_QA_Report_030806.xls".

New York’s inventory in Version 2 included emission s for both residential indoor and outdoor wood burning. For Version 3, New York provided rev isions that lowered its overall emissions relative to Version 2 and broke out its inventory t o show emissions for fireplaces, woodstoves, and outdoor equipment separately. New York also ad ded NH 3 

## emissions to its inventory for Version 3. New York’s inventory for industrial adh esives originates from the 1999 NEI. New York provided its own 2002 inventory for PFCs. Emi ssions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared by

EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE-VUsponsored inventories.

New York elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inventori es for the following source categories:

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for agricultural livestock; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories.

## 67

A QA issue that may affect the use of the MANE-VU i nventory for air quality modeling and revisions to the projection year inventory is the a ddition of SCCs 2103004001 and 2103004002 by New York that are not in EPA’s master SCC list u sed by the EPA QA program. These SCCs are defined in Table III-15. In addition, the QA p rogram shows SCCs for PFCs and outdoor wood burning as invalid because EPA has not updated the master list to include these SCCs for the EPA QA program. These SCCs were included in Ve rsion 2 and should have been assigned speaciation profiles and included in the projection year inventory prepared from Version 2.68Table III-15. Summary of New York's Revisions to Version 3 of MANE-VU's Area Source InventorySCC SCC DescriptionPollutantType of Revision to EmissionsRevisions to Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery : Wastewater Treatment2630020000 Public Owned : Total Processed VOCRevised emissions for all pollutantsRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Residential : Wood2104008001 Fireplaces: GeneralVOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added NH3, revised emissions for restof pollutants2104008052 Non-catalytic Woodstoves: Low Emitting VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutants2104008070 Outdoor Wood Burning Equipment VOC, NOX,CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutantsRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Electric Utility2101001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change to emissions2101002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2101004000 Distillate Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2101005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2101006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutantsRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Industrial2102001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change to emissions2102002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2102004000 Distillate Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2102005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2102006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2102007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2102008000 Wood : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX,CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change to emissions2102011000 Kerosene : Total: All Boiler Types VOC,NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutantsRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Commercial/Institutional2103001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change to emissions2103002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2103005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2103004000 Residual Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Removed and replaced with data forSCCs 2103004001 and 21030040022103004001 Distillate Oil : BoilersVOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutants2103004002 Distillate Oil : IC EnginesVOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutants2103006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2103007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2103008000 Wood : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX,CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions forall pollutants2103011000 Kerosene : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutants69Table III-15. Summary of New York's Revisions to Version 3 of MANE-VU's Area Source Inventory (Continued)SCC SCC DescriptionPollutantType of Revision to EmissionsRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Residential2104001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Nochange to emissions2104002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2104004000 Distillate Oil : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2104006010 Natural Gas : Residential Furnaces VOC,NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissionsfor all pollutants2104007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2104011000 Kerosene : Total: All Heater Types VOC,NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutants

## 70 10. Pennsylvania

Table III-16 shows the emission type periods for wh ich Pennsylvania provided emissions.

Table III-16. Pennsylvania 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30

MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30

MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30

MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30

MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30

MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30

MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30

MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30

MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30

MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30



## Table B-10 in Appendix B identifies the data source s by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type perio d combinations are listed more than once

because the data source codes are different for mor e than one SCC and emission type period combination. Pennsylvania provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories. Pennsylvania provided its own 2002 inv entory for PFCs and residential indoor wood burning. Pennsylvania’s inventory for industrial a dhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA da ta carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE-VU-sponsored inventories.

Pennsylvania elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inven tories for the following source categories:

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes a nd agricultural crop fertilizers and livestock;

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for POTWs and composting; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories.

## 71 11. Rhode Island

Table III-17 shows the emission type periods for wh ich Rhode Island provided emissions.

Table III-17. Rhode Island 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29



## Table B-11 in Appendix B identifies the data source s by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Rhode Island provided 2002 annual VOC emis sions for several solvent utilization categories (surface coating, degreasing, graphic ar ts, rubber/plastics, and industrial adhesive); annual and daily VOC emissions for petroleum and pe troleum product storage (gasoline service stations and all transport types); and annual VOC e missions for POTWs. Rhode Island’s indoor wood burning inventory originates from the draft 20 02 NEI. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NE I (that are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forward from fi nal Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE-VU-sponsored inventories.

Rhode Island elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inven tories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved and unpaved roads; and

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs.

## 72 12. Vermont

Table III-18 shows the emission type periods for wh ich Vermont provided emissions.

Table III-18. Vermont 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission T ypes

Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29



## Table B-12 in Appendix B identifies the data source s by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Vermont provided 2002 annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, PM10-PRI or PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI or PM25-FIL, and SO 2 

## emissions for residential fuel combustion (distill ate oil, natural gas, LPG, and indoor wood burning); annual VOC emissions for gasoline service stations and breathing losses at bulk terminals; annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for residential open burning; annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, and PM25-PRI emissions for forest fires, and annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, PM10-PRI, and PM25-PRI emissions for structur e fires. Vermont’s inventory for industrial adhesives origin ates from the 1999 NEI.

For Version 2, Vermont provided revisions to EPA’s draft 2002 inventory for SCC 2501050120 (bulk stations and terminals : breathing loss : gas oline) to incorporate the effects of vapor

balance controls not accounted for in the EPA estim ates. The revised inventory for this category was added to Version 2 (and kept in Version 3) that did not include this category. Control

records were added to the NIF 3.0 CE table for the counties with vapor balance controls. In addition, Vermont provided emissions for three coun ties (i.e., county FIPS codes 50015, 50017, and 50019) that were not in EPA's inventory. Emiss ions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA

data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 19 99 NEI) or MANE-VU-sponsored inventories. Vermont elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inventorie s for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 

## emissions for outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL e missions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes a nd POTWs;

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs;

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories.

## 73

C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

This section provides a summary of potential revisi ons to incorporate into future versions of the MANE-VU area source inventory.

All States – A coordinated effort between the State agencies should be developed to apply consistent methods to avoid having to apply procedu res to augment inventory data to correct for the QA issues and fill in missing data as discussed previously in this chapter. For example, this will ensure that consistent methods are applied acr oss State agencies to ensure consistent and accurate reporting of source categories using the s ame SCCs across States, PM emissions, and minimize other QA issues that were identified durin g the development of Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the inventory.

For PM emissions, the State agencies should develop and apply a consistent method for including condensible emissions for fuel combustion sources that can be applied when the agencies develop their inventories. This may inclu de compiling the emission factors for all forms of PM into one database, organized by SCC and control type (for filterable emissions), and sharing the database among the MANE-VU State agenci es. Use of a consistent set of emission factors will help to avoid the PM consistency issue s identified in Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the MANE-VU inventory as well as ensure that condensibl e emissions are included in the primary emissions reported in the inventory.

State-specific suggestions are as follows:

Delaware: Revise the residential wood combustion e missions inventory with the latest revisions sponsored by MARAMA.

Rhode Island: This State felt that the area source s (from the nonpoint inventory EPA prepared) which they had changed to zeros in Version 3 would revert back to the Version 2 numbers which were from the EPA report. Rhode Island would like to see this change in the next version of the inventory. (Table with changes can be received upo n request).

New Jersey:

• Why is the EPA VOC emission factor for fireplaces c ompletely out of proportion with the

other emission factors? The ratio of conventional wood stoves/fireplaces = 0% to 10% for other pollutants and is 77% for VOC. It is dis cussed in the Pechan Technical Memo #5, 9/3/03, page 19, how a study of the accuracy of the emission factors showed the VOC should be more like 10 to 30 lb/ton, instead of 229 lb/ton and the woodstove emission factors (certified) should be higher than Emission Inventory Improvement Program guidance.

• The summer seasonal adjustment factors for indoor w ood burning used in the model appear high. This combined with the very high VOC emission factor results in high ozone season wood burning emissions.

## 74

• In general, the accuracy of the very large resident ial wood burning numbers, all pollutants.

• The large fugitive dust inventory numbers don not c orrelate to dust found in monitors, even with the latest 30% to 40% reduction in paved and unpaved road emissions.

• We need consistent guidance from the EPA for adhesi ves and sealants, PFC, and commercial cooking.

## 75

CHAPTER IV

–

NONROAD SOURCES

A. General Methods for all States

This section provides an overview of the data sourc es and QA steps used in preparing the 2002 nonroad sector inventory for the MANE-VU States. T he nonroad sector is comprised of nonroad engines included in EPA’s NONROAD model, as well as other engines not modeled in NONROAD, including aircraft, commercial marine vess els and locomotives.

1. What Data Sources Were Used?

Data sources used for the various nonroad categorie s are described below.

a. Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive Cate gories

As a starting point, aircraft, commercial marine ve ssel and locomotive inventories were prepared using the inventories that State agencies submitted to the EPA in June 2004 as a requirement of the CERR. In addition, some States provided data d irectly to MANE-VU for use in this inventory that were not submitted for the CERR.

Missing data were supplemented with estimates from EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. For the aircraft and commercial marine vessel source catego ries, the 2002 NEI CAP emissions were estimated by carrying over the 2001 estimates. 200 1 emissions were estimated using the methodologies described in EPA’s Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine Vesse l, Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components of the Nat ional Emissions Inventory (EPA, 2003b). The 2002 locomotive emissions were calculated using 2002 activity data and the methodologies described in the EPA, 2003b documentation.

Table IV-1 provides a summary of the aircraft, comm ercial marine, and locomotive emission SCCs reported in the MANE-VU inventory. Table IV-2 provides a summary of the basis for these nonroad subsector emissions by State.76Table IV-1. List of Unique Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive SCCs Reported by States in MANE-VU InventorySCC SCC Description 1 SCC Description 2 SCC Description 3 SCC Description 42275000000 Mobile Sources Aircraft All Aircraft Types and Operations Total2275001000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Military Aircraft Total2275020000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Commercial Aircraft Total: All Types2275050000 Mobile Sources Aircraft General AviationTotal2275060000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Air Taxi Total2275070000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Aircraft Auxiliary Power Units Total2280000000 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial All Fuels Total, All Vessel Types2280002000 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Total, All Vessel Types2280002010 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Ocean-going Vessels2280002020 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Harbor Vessels2280002100 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Port emissions2280002200 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Underway emissions2280003100 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Residual Port emissions2280003200 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Residual Underway emissions2285000000 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment All Fuels Total2285002000 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment DieselTotal2285002005 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment DieselTotal Line Haul Locomotives2285002006 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment DieselLine Haul Locomotives: Class I Operations2285002007 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment DieselLine Haul Locomotives: Class II / III Operations2285002008 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment DieselLine Haul Locomotives: Passenger Trains (Amtrak)2285002009 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment DieselLine Haul Locomotives: Commuter Lines2285002010 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment DieselYard Locomotives77Table IV-2. Summary of Basis for 2002 MANE-VU Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive InventoryBasis for Subsector of Nonroad InventoryFIPSST State Aircraft Commercial Marine Vessels Locomotives09 Connecticut 2002 Preliminary NEI 2002 Preliminary NEI State supplied in March 200610 Delaware June 2004 CERR Submittal; Statesupplied revisions in Sep 2004June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CERR Submittal11 District of Columbia Not supplied by State and not availablefrom NEI2002 Preliminary NEI June 2004 CERR Submittal23 Maine State supplied in Oct 2004 State suppliedin Oct 2004 State supplied in Oct 200424 Maryland June 2004 CERR Submittal; Statesupplied revisions in Sep 2004June 2004 CERR Submittal; Statesupplied revisions in Oct 2004June 2004 CERR Submittal25 Massachusetts June 2004 CERR Submittal State-supplied for June 2004 CERRSubmittal, with revisions as directed byStateJune 2004 CERR Submittal33 New Hampshire June 2004 CERR Submittal 2002 Preliminary NEI June 2004 CERR Submittal34 New Jersey June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CERR Submittal36 New York 2002 Preliminary NEI State supplied inOct 2004 2002 Preliminary NEI42 Pennsylvania State supplied to Pechan in June 2004 State supplied to Pechan in June 2004 State supplied to Pechan in June 2004;State supplied revisions in Aug 200544 Rhode Island State-supplied for June 2004 CERRSubmittal, with revisions as directed byStateState-supplied for June 2004 CERRSubmittal, with revisions as directed byStateState-supplied in Oct 200450 Vermont 2002 Preliminary NEI Not supplied by State and not availablefrom NEINot supplied by State and not availablefrom NEI

## 78 b. NONROAD Model Categories

NONROAD model categories include equipment such as recreational marine and land-based vehicles, farm and construction machinery, and lawn and garden equipment. Aircraft ground support equipment (GSE) and rail maintenance equipm ent are also included in NONROAD. These equipment are powered by diesel, gasoline, co mpressed natural gas (CNG) and LPG engines.

EPA released a final version of NONROAD during Dece mber 2005 called NONROAD2005 (EPA, 2005a). To reflect the updates made to EPA’s final NONROAD model, all MANE-VU Version 2 NONROAD model estimates were replaced wit h updated NONROAD2005 emission

estimates.

EPA also released an updated version of its NMIM, w hich incorporates the final

NONROAD2005 model. EPA’s NMIM2005 is a consolidate d modeling system that incorporates the NONROAD and MOBILE models, along w ith a county database of inputs (EPA, 2005b). The NMIM county database contains mo nthly input data to reflect countyspecific fuel parameters and temperatures. Because incorporating revised monthly inputs for use in NMIM2005 is more efficient than preparing county -specific monthly option files needed to run NONROAD2005 independently, Pechan used NMIM2005 for most MANE-VU States. The two exceptions were for the District of Columbia an d Maine due to the differences in oxygenated fuel inputs used for NMIM versus NONROAD.

As a first step, Pechan compiled fuel input data av ailable from NMIM2005 by county and by

month for all MANE-VU states for 2002. Pechan deve loped a spreadsheet that summarized the gasoline RVP, gasoline weight percent oxygen, and g asoline and diesel sulfur content proposed as inputs to the updated runs. Values consistent w ith State-supplied MOBILE6 inputs used for the development of 2002 MANE-VU highway vehicle inv entories were presented for use where they differed from NMIM. Pechan requested that Sta tes confirm the use of these data for the NONROAD model runs, or provide alternative inputs.

The final county, monthly NMIM inputs provided or c onfirmed by the States for RVP, weight percent oxygen, and gasoline sulfur are presented i n Appendix C, Table C-1. Pechan used

NMIM’s 2002 default value for nonroad diesel sulfur content. This value is 2,457 parts per million (ppm) for land-based equipment, and 2,767 p pm for recreational marine, for all

MANE-VU counties.

Pechan also requested that States provide any local activity data in the format of updated

NONROAD external data files. These include data fi les which specify activity parameters such as equipment populations, equipment annual hours of use, county allocation factors, and monthly allocation profiles.

Pechan updated the NMIM county database for 2002 to add in new gasoline profiles to reflect the monthly and county fuel input values provided b y States. Pechan also updated the NMIM county database to cross reference the State-suppli ed NONROAD data files that replaced default

## 79

NONROAD2005 inputs. Pechan then ran NMIM/NONROAD20 05 at the county and monthly level for 2002 and generated the results in NIF 3.0

.

c. NONROAD2005 Model Runs

The majority of the model runs were performed using NMIM2005. NMIM and NONROAD have differences in the required format of the oxyg enated fuel inputs. For NONROAD, this variable is required to be expressed as a composite weight percent oxygen that accounts for the market share and the percent oxygen of all contribu ting oxygenates. Since NMIM models HAP emissions, the volume percent and market share of e ach of four oxygenates must be entered as fuel inputs. These oxygenates include methyl terti ary butyl ether (MTBE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), ethanol (ETOH), and tertiary amyl met hyl ether (TAME). In cases where only one known oxygenate is present, this is straightfor ward to reflect in NMIM, as weight percent can be easily converted to volume percent. However , two States (the District of Columbia and Maine) provided a composite weight percent value fo r more than one oxygenate, but could not provide the corresponding volume percent and market share for each oxygenate to use in NMIM. As such, Pechan used NONROAD2005 for both the Distr ict of Columbia and Maine so that their submitted values for weight percent oxygen could be used directly. The 2002 minimum, maximum, and average hourly temperatures included i n NMIM2005 were used to calculate average monthly temperature inputs to NONROAD for b oth States.

Pechan developed monthly NONROAD option files and r an these files through NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 2002 inventory. Pechan performed additional calculations using NMIM emission factors and fuel consumption to

calculate NH 3 

## , since NONROAD does not calculate NH 3 

## emissions.

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed?

The final MANE-VU nonroad inventory was comprised o f emission estimates that were either: 1) submitted by States for the June 2004 CERR submi ttal or as additional revisions after this date; 2) developed using NONROAD model inputs provi ded or approved by States; or 3) reported by EPA in the preliminary 2002 NEI. As such, the QA steps were tailored to each of these types of submittals. Note that a Quality Ass urance Plan was prepared prior to initiating work on Version 1 (MANE-VU, 2003). This plan was a pplied during development of all three versions of the MANE-VU inventory.

a. Summary of QA checks for State emission submitta ls

Nonroad emission submittals were accepted as part o f the June 2004 CERR submittals to EPA or as direct submittals to MANE-VU. Upon receipt of a n emissions submittal, Pechan prepared spreadsheets providing a unique list of errors iden tified by running the EPA NIF 3.0 QA software tool on the nonroad source inventory (EPA, 2004a). Notes were provided to identify the NIF 3.0 tables in which the errors appeared, as well as clarification as to where an error occurred (e.g., for what SCC and pollutant). For m any of the errors, Pechan provided a potential correction, and States indicated whether they agree d with the correction, or provided their own

## 80

instructions for correcting the error. These sprea dsheets served to document each state's

direction on how to correct errors and the state's representative authorizing the correction.

The list of general QA checks include the following :

• Duplicate records (i.e., only one record allowed for each unique county/SCC/ pollutant) • Invalid record type • Mandatory field is not populated • Invalid field length • Invalid data type (e.g., invalid SCCs or pollutan ts) • “Out-of-range” emission values • Referential integrity (i.e., the presence of wido w or orphan records in the NIF 3.0 relational tables)

Note that EPA’s NIF 3.0 QA software tool also check s for other specific QA issues by field not listed above. See EPA’s User Guide, Appendix A for a listing of all potential errors that are checked by the program, and EPA’s guidance for how they should be resolved.

Pechan also performed other general QA procedures o utside of EPA’s NIF 3.0 QA software tool, including pollutant augmentation, SCC reconciliatio n, and completeness and reasonableness

checks.

Pechan performed pollutant augmentation in cases wh ere the complete set of CAPs and NH 3 

## were not provided by a State. For example, several States did not provide PM25-PRI, but did provide PM10-PRI, so that PM25-PRI was estimated us ing EPA-published particle-size multipliers. Where multipliers were not available from EPA documentation, Pechan used available pollutant emission estimates reported by all other MANE-VU States to develop “emission ratios” for a given SCC. These “emission ratios” were then used to multiply available pollutant estimates to estimate values for the miss ing pollutants. Specific values used for a given State and SCC are cited in the “State-Specific Meth ods” section below.

In addition, SCC assignments were reviewed and reas signed after clarification from States as to what the specific SCC estimate represented. For ex ample, a State may have reported all aircraft activity under one of the specific aircraft type SC Cs (e.g., commercial or general aviation), when it should more accurately be reported under the gen eral SCC 2275000000 (All Aircraft Types and Operations).

Finally, completeness checks were performed on the inventory to determine that emissions for nonroad categories known to operate in a State or c ounty were being reported. Note that emissions may not be reported for all NONROAD SCCs for all counties in the MANE-VU RPO, and will depend on the geographic allocation method s used by the model, or specific allocation data provided by a State.

NONROAD model category estimates originally provide d by States for the June 2004 submittal were replaced by emission estimates developed using NMIM/NONROAD 2005. As such, this

## 81

TSD will not document corrections made by Pechan to these original NONROAD model estimates, since they were replaced for Version 3.

b. Data input summary spreadsheets for State review

As mentioned above for NONROAD model categories, Pe chan prepared the MANE-VU emission estimates using EPA’s final NMIM/NONROAD20 05 model. An important QA step in running NONROAD is to ensure that the inputs used f or fuel specifications and temperatures for a given county and month in 2002 are representative . As such, Pechan compiled the RVP, percent oxygen, and gasoline sulfur inputs reported by NMIM2005 by county and month for States to review. If a State had previously submit ted input data for the MANE-VU onroad inventory, these data were proposed in lieu of NMIM data. States either confirmed use of the default NMIM/onroad MANE-VU inputs, or provided alt ernate data in the specified format to replace the proposed inputs. Pechan updated the gasoline table in the NMIM county database to add in new gasoline profiles to reflect revised fue l input values provided by States. These profiles were then cross-referenced to the appropri ate county and month in a separate table called countyyearmonth . Pechan performed QA checks of these NMIM county database tables for each State to ensure that the correct fuel data were inp ut by county and by month as requested by the

State.

c. QA of final mass emissions

After performing QA of the inputs, Pechan ran NMIM/ NONROAD2005 at the county and monthly level for 2002 and generated the results in NIF 3.0. As a QA step, Pechan ran EPA’s NIF 3.0 QA software tool on the NIF 3.0 files. Err ors identified were resolved and checked to ensure they were corrected in the final files.

As part of final processing of the inventories, and to assist in tracking revisions and preparing emission summaries, Pechan added the following NIF plus fields to each table:

TblCE : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revis ion Date TblEM : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revis ion Date, CAP/HAP, Year, Emission Ton Value, Emission Type Period TblEP : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revis ion Date TblPE : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revis ion Date TblTR : State FIPS, County FIPS, Revision Date

Data source codes are included to document the orig in of the emissions data, which assists in tracking and quality-assuring revisions made to the emission estimates. Table IV-3 provides a listing of the data source codes included in the MA NE-VU nonroad inventories, as well as a definition of each code. State FIPS and County FIP S are separated out to assist in developing area-specific emission summaries, and the Emission Ton Value places all emissions on the same basis. The Emission Type Period describes the temp oral basis of the estimates (in this case, they are all annual). Finally, the Revision Date tracks when record-specific changes are made.

## 82 Table IV-3. Data Source Code Descriptions

Data
Source Code Description
E-02-F E = EPA-generated data; -02 = year 2002; -F = emissions are carried forward for inclusion in

the 2002 base year
E-02-X E = EPA-generated data; -02 = year 2002; -F = emissions are not grown or carried forward P-02-X P = RPO-generated data; -02 = year 2002; -X = emissions are not grown or carried forward S-02-X S = State data; -02 = year 2002 data; -X = e missions are not grown or carried forward



## 3. Version 3 Emission Summaries

Table IV-4 presents a summary of the annual 2002 no nroad sector pollutant emissions for each MANE-VU State, as well as a regional total. These emissions include SCCs for all NONROAD model engines, as well as aircraft, commercial mari ne vessel, and locomotive categories, where applicable, for each State. Table IV-5 presents th e emission results for NONROAD model equipment only, while Table IV-6 provides emission estimates for aircraft, commercial marine vessel, and locomotive categories separately.

Table IV-4. Annual 2002 Nonroad Sector Emissions b y MANE-VU State (Tons/Year)

State CO NH 3 NO x PM10-PRI PM25-PRI SO 2 VOC

Connecticut 276,773.0 16.6 25,460.2 1,952.1 1,793.9 2,087.4 33,880.2

Delaware 68,782.0 5.2 16,226.5 1,021.4 925.6 3,983. 3 8,010.1

District of Columbia 18,844.7 2.4 3,571.3 310.2 298 .7 375.4 2,072.5

Maine 153,423.6 11.4 9,820.4 1,436.8 1,329.4 916.8 31,144.1

Maryland 437,400.3 28.2 37,472.2 4,936.0 4,357.1 7, 941.6 56,330.4

Massachusetts 461,514.3 28.2 42,768.5 3,531.2 3,226 .4 3,791.2 56,748.5

New Hampshire 130,782.2 9.1 9,912.1 1,057.8 965.4 8 91.0 22,376.5

New Jersey 704,396.4 43.0 63,479.0 5,495.1 4,997.2 15,686.0 83,918.9

New York 1,233,968.3 79.3 109,878.3 9,605.3 8,820.9 12,919.7 157,611.7

Pennsylvania 931,978.0 55.0 103,824.2 9,737.9 8,440 .1 7,915.0 102,331.0

Rhode Island 73,012.7 4.1 5,001.5 500.2 443.1 377.2 7,779.7

Vermont 62,248.1 4.5 4,217.1 529.9 485.8 372.1 10,5 47.6

Total MANE-VU 4,553,123.5 286.9 431,631.3 40,113.9 36,083.6 57,256.6 572,751.3

## 83

Table IV-5. Annual 2002 NONROAD2005 Model Emission s by MANE-VU State (Tons/Year)

State CO NH 3 NO x PM10-PRI PM25-PRI SO 2 VOC

Connecticut 274,387.6 16.6 17,897.0 1,712.9 1,577.6 1,376.6 33,519.0

Delaware 65,954.1 4.9 5,798.3 570.4 525.1 513.0 7,530.5

District of Columbia 18,774.9 2.4 3,066.4 298.4 287 .8 341.3 2,052.9

Maine 148,555.3 11.4 8,228.9 1,204.2 1,135.1 771.8 30,741.0

Maryland 424,776.8 28.2 27,789.1 3,118.7 2,870.4 2,569.2 53,035.0

Massachusetts 448,398.7 28.2 30,046.7 2,887.2 2,658 .8 2,428.1 54,835.8

New Hampshire 128,571.5 9.1 8,149.5 946.8 871.7 672.7 22,237.8

New Jersey 692,547.9 43.0 43,515.2 4,285.4 3,950.5 3,524.9 81,900.4

New York 1,219,308.7 79.3 78,648.3 8,338.9 7,677.1 6,966.3 155,475.1

Pennsylvania 903,167.7 55.0 62,265.2 6,281.5 5,784. 3 5,292.4 99,240.9

Rhode Island 71,573.1 4.1 4,563.9 402.8 371.1 335.5 7,698.7

Vermont 61,732.1 4.5 4,169.9 517.6 476.6 367.6 10,520.4

Total MANE-VU 4,457,748.6 286.6 294,138.2 30,564.8 28,186.1 25,159.4 558,787.4



## Table IV-6. Annual 2002 Aircraft, Commercial Marin e, and Locomotive Emissions by MANE-VU State

(Tons/Year)

State CO NH 3 NO x PM10-PRI PM25-PRI SO 2 VOC

Connecticut 2,385.4 0.0 7,563.2 239.2 216.4 710.8 3 61.2

Delaware 2,827.9 0.3 10,428.2 451.1 400.5 3,470.3 4 79.6

District of Columbia 69.7 0.0 505.0 11.8 10.9 34.1 19.7

Maine 4,868.3 0.0 1,591.5 232.6 194.3 145.0 403.1

Maryland 12,623.5 0.0 9,683.2 1,817.3 1,486.7 5,372 .3 3,295.4

Massachusetts 13,115.6 0.0 12,721.7 644.0 567.6 1,3 63.1 1,912.7

New Hampshire 2,210.7 0.0 1,762.5 111.0 93.7 218.3 138.6

New Jersey 11,848.5 0.0 19,963.9 1,209.7 1,046.7 12 ,161.1 2,018.6

New York 14,659.6 0.0 31,230.0 1,266.4 1,143.8 5,95 3.4 2,136.6

Pennsylvania 28,810.2 0.0 41,559.0 3,456.4 2,655.8 2,622.7 3,090.2

Rhode Island 1,439.6 0.0 437.6 97.4 72.1 41.7 81.0

Vermont 516.0 0.0 47.3 12.2 9.2 4.5 27.2

Total MANE-VU 95,374.9 0.3 137,493.1 9,549.1 7,897 .4 32,097.3 13,963.9

## 84

B. State-Specific Methods

The following sections describe the methods used an d QA issues addressed for each MANE-VU State in developing Version 3.0 of MANE-VU’s nonroa d sector inventory.

1. Connecticut

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan ran EPA’s NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Pechan incorporated Connecticut-supplied data for gasoline sulfur content and RVP into the NMIM

database. Pechan used NMIM defaults for diesel sul fur content and for weight percent oxygenate values. The final input data by county a nd by month are summarized in Table B-1.

Aircraft and commercial marine vessel emissions are based on the preliminary 2002 nonroad NEI. In March 2006, Connecticut provided county-le vel emission estimates for VOC, NO

x 

## , and CO for all line-haul and switchyard locomotive SCCs

.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

For commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000), PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were not reported in the EPA’s NEI. For completeness, Pechan estimated PM10 -PRI emissions by applying an average

PM10-PRI/NO

x 

## emission ratio of 0.058 to available NO

x 

## emissions. Commercial aircraft PM25- PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PR I emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

Because EPA’s NEI does not include locomotive categ ory emission estimates for Connecticut, and since Connecticut only provided emission estima tes for VOC, NO

x 

## , and CO, estimates are still missing for PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2



## .

2. Delaware

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Delaware approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. The final fuel input data by county and by month are summarized in Table B-1. Delaware provid ed updated files listed in Table IV-7 to replace the default files used in NMIM. These incl uded county allocation files for five nonroad categories, and a revised equipment population file with updated populations for specific SCCs.

## 85 Table IV-7. Delaware NONROAD External Data Files

County NR File Name File Type 10000air.alo County allocation for airport GSE 10000gc.alo County allocation for golf carts 10000hou.alo County allocation for lawn & garden 10000log.alo County allocation for logging 10000rvp.alo County allocation for land-based recre ational 10000.pop Equipment population



## Pechan used Delaware’s June 2004 CERR submittal as the basis for aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel category estimates in the 2002 MANE-VU inventory.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

In September 2004, Delaware provided corrections to the general aviation emissions (SCC 227505000) for all pollutants for Kent County to ad d in general aviation activity at Dover Air

Force Base.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the fi le to address QA issues as approved by Delaware. Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) inc luded emission estimates for all pollutants except PM25-PRI. Pechan calculated comm ercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions using the assumption that 97.6% of PM10-PRI is PM25-PRI ( ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

3. District of Columbia

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan developed NONROAD Model SCC emissions for Di strict of Columbia using NONROAD2005. NONROAD2005 was used directly instead of NMIM2005 to incorporate State-supplied weight percent oxygen data. The Dis trict of Columbia also requested changes to the default NMIM RVP and gasoline values for some m onths. The final fuel input data by county and by month are summarized in Table B-1.

The 2002 minimum, maximum, and average hourly tempe ratures included in NMIM were used to calculate average monthly temperature inputs to NONROAD. Pechan developed monthly NONROAD2005 option files for the District of Columb ia. Pechan ran the option files through NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 2002 inventory. Pechan performed additional calcul ations using NMIM emission factors and NONROAD2005 fuel consumption to calculate NH 3 

## , since NONROAD does not calculate NH 3 

## emissions. NMIM reports NH 3 

## emission factors of 116 grams NH 3 

## per gallon gasoline for gasoline engines, and 83 grams NH 3 

## per gallon fuel for diesel engines.

## 86

The District of Columbia provided locomotive emissi ons for their nonroad sector June 2004

CERR submittal.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the fi le to address QA issues as approved by the

District of Columbia. PM emissions in the inventor y were not identified as either PM 10 

## or PM 2.5 

## , nor were the emissions identified as primary or fil terable. The District of Columbia authorized Pechan to change PM to PM10-PRI. Locomotive PM25-P RI emissions were estimated using the assumption that 90 percent of PM 10 

## is PM 2.5 

## (EPA, 2003b). Hydrocarbon (HC) pollutant emissions were also removed from the inventory, as this is not a valid pollutant code in NIF3.0.

Pechan added commercial marine vessel emissions fro m the preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI.

There are no aircraft emission estimates in the NEI for the District of Columbia, since there are not airports located in the District of Columbia.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

4. Maine

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan developed NONROAD model SCC emissions using NONROAD2005. For Maine, weight percent oxygen values were submitted based o n actual fuel survey results by county and by month, but Maine had not tracked the correspondi ng oxygenate volume percent and market share. As such, Pechan used NONROAD2005 so that Ma ine’s values for weight percent oxygen could be reflected. Maine also provided revisions to the RVP and gasoline sulfur values reported in NMIM2005. Pechan developed NONROAD2005 monthly option files for two county groups in Maine that shared values for all three fuel inpu ts (see Appendix C, Table C-1). The 2002 minimum, maximum, and average hourly temperatures i ncluded in NMIM were used to calculate average monthly temperature inputs to NONROAD. Pec han ran the option files through NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 2002 inventory. Pechan performed additional calcul ations using NMIM emission factors and fuel consumption to calculate NH 3 

## , since NONROAD does not calculate NH 3 

## emissions. NMIM reports NH 3 

## emission factors of 116 grams NH 3 

## per gallon gasoline for gasoline engines, and 83 grams NH 3 

## per gallon fuel for diesel engines.

## 87 i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

In October 2004, Maine provided aircraft, commercia l marine vessel, and locomotive SCC emissions to be added to their inventory. Commerci al marine emissions submitted by Maine only represented in-port emissions. Diesel and res idual commercial marine underway emissions (SCCs 2280002200 and 2280003200) were based on EPA’ s 2002 preliminary NEI.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

PM25-PRI estimates were missing from all aircraft S CC records provided by Maine. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). Commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM 10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004). In-port commercia l marine emissions (SCC 2280002100) were missing estimates for PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI. Pecha n estimated PM10-PRI emissions by applying a PM10-PRI/NO

x 

## emission ratio of 0.042 to available NO

x 

## emissions. PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI em issions by a particle size multiplier of 0.92 (EPA, 2003b).

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

5. Maryland

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to prepare NONROAD model SCC e mission estimates. Maryland reviewed the default NMIM inputs and provided revis ions to the input values for RVP and weight percent oxygen for all months. Maryland req uested that a value of 2.1 percent oxygen be used for all counties and months. This weight perc ent value was then converted to a volume percent of 11.8 percent for use in NMIM, assuming M TBE was the only oxygenate. In addition, gasoline sulfur content revisions were incorporated into NMIM for select counties for the months of April through September. The final fuel input d ata by county and by month are summarized

in Table B-1.

Maryland also provided updated files listed in Tabl e IV-8 to replace the default files used in NMIM. These included county allocation files for s everal nonroad categories.

Table IV-8. Maryland NONROAD External Data Files

County NR File Name File Type 24000pop.alo County allocation for several nonroad categories (population) 24000con.alo County allocation for construction 24000hou.alo County allocation for lawn & garden

## 88

Pechan used Maryland’s nonroad sector CERR submitta l as the basis for the MANE-VU inventory for the aircraft, locomotive and commerci al marine vessel categories.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

In September 2004, Maryland provided revised aircra ft and commercial marine vessel emission estimates. Pechan replaced the aircraft and commer cial marine vessel emissions from their

CERR submittal with the revised emissions.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the fi le to address QA issues as approved by Maryland. Maryland did not provide PM25-PRI aircra ft emissions in their inventory. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). Commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM 10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

6. Massachusetts

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Massachusetts reviewed the NMIM inputs and approved of the fuel input values for RVP and gasoline sulfur content. NMIM2005 reported a weigh t percent oxygen of 2.1 percent for all months for all counties in Massachusetts, and the S tate requested a value of 1.5 percent be used for all counties from October through April. This weight percent value was then converted to a volume percent of 8.4 percent for use in NMIM, give n that MTBE was the only oxygenate. Final fuel input data by county and by month are pr esented in Table B-1.

Massachusetts provided annual emissions for aircraf t, locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories for their nonroad sector CERR submittal. These inventories included all CAP.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

Massachusetts requested that Pechan incorporate rev isions supplied for annual emissions for inport diesel commercial marine (SCC 2280002010) for Dukes County (25007).

## 89 b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan changed the aircraft SCC “2275050000” to “22 75000000,” since Massachusetts verified that this emission record represents all aircraft t ypes, not just general aviation.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

7. New Hampshire

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New Hampshire reviewed and approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B-1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by county and month.

Pechan used New Hampshire’s nonroad sector CERR sub mittal as the basis for the MANE-VU aircraft and locomotive inventory. Pechan added co mmercial marine vessel emissions from the preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the fi le to address QA issues as approved by New Hampshire. New Hampshire did not provide PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## aircraft emissions in their inventory. New Hampshire authorized Pechan to deve lop aircraft PM 10 

## emissions for all aircraft types by applying an average PM10/NO

x 

## emission ratio to the aircraft NO

x 

## emissions in their inventory. The PM 10 

## /NO

x 

## ratios used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 for general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial aircraft. Pecha n estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying PM10 -PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For commercial ai rcraft, Pechan estimated PM25-PRI emissions using the assumption that 97.6% of PM 10 

## is PM 2.5 

## (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

8. New Jersey

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New Jersey approved of the default fuel inputs used in NMIM200 5. See Table B-1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by county and month. New Jer sey provided an updated data input file

## 90

containing revised equipment populations (34000.pop ) for specific SCCs for the NMIM model

runs.

Pechan used New Jersey’s nonroad sector CERR submit tal as the basis for the aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories. These inventories included all CAPs.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the fi le to address QA issues as approved by New Jersey. The only QA issue identified was the inclu sion of carbon dioxide (CO 2 

## ) in the inventory, which is not a valid pollutant code in NIF3.0, so t hese records were removed.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

9. New York

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New York reviewed the default NMIM inputs and provided revis ions to the input values for RVP and gasoline sulfur for all months. New York also requ ested revisions to weight percent oxygen values for all counties and months. These weight p ercent values were then converted to a volume percent for use in NMIM, based on MTBE as th e only oxygenate for all counties, with the exception of four counties. These included Cat taraugus, Chautauqua, Erie, and Niagara counties, which use ETOH as the oxygenate. The fin al fuel input data by county and by month

are summarized in Table B-1.

For the aircraft and locomotive categories, Pechan used emissions reported in the preliminary

2002 Nonroad NEI.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

In October 2004, New York provided commercial marin e vessel emissions to be added to their inventory. New York did not provide PM-2.5 commerc ial marine vessel emissions for some counties in their inventory. Pechan estimated the commercial marine vessel PM25-PRI emissions from PM10-PRI using the assumption that 9 2% of PM 10 

## is PM 2.5 

## (EPA, 2003b).

## 91 b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) emissions for PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were not reported in the EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. Pechan estimated PM10-PRI emissions by applying a PM10-PRI/NO

x 

## emission ratio of 0.058 to available NO

x 

## emissions for this SCC.

Commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions were estimat ed by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

10. Pennsylvania

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Pennsylvania approved of the fuel inputs provided, which were ba sed on the onroad MOBILE6 inputs. Since these differed from the values in NMIM2005, Pechan updated the NMIM profiles accordingly. See Table B-1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by county and month. Pennsylvania provided one county allocation file for the lawn an d garden category (42000hou.alo) to replace

the default file used in NMIM.

Pennsylvania submitted an aircraft, locomotive, and commercial marine vessel emissions inventory to MANE-VU after the CERR submittal date.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

In August 2005, Pennsylvania provided Pechan with c ounty-level updates to SCC 2285002006 (Line Haul Locomotives: Class I Operations) emissio ns for all pollutants. Pechan updated all emission records for this SCC in Pennsylvania's inv entory.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pennsylvania authorized Pechan to remove the CO 2 

## emission records from their inventory. In addition, the following data augmentation was perfo rmed to add missing SCCs and pollutants. Pennsylvania did not provide commercial aircraft em issions in their inventory. Pechan added commercial aircraft emissions from the 2002 prelimi nary NEI to Pennsylvania’s inventory. Pennsylvania did not provide PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI aircraft emissions in their inventory. Pechan developed aircraft PM 10 

## emissions for all aircraft types by applying an av erage PM 10 

## /

NO

x 

## emission ratio to Pennsylvania’s available aircraf t NO

x 

## emissions. The PM 10 

## /NO

x 

## ratios used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 fo r general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, milit ary aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle siz e multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For commercial aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25-PRI emis sions using the assumption that 97.6% of

PM 10 

## is PM 2.5 

## (ERG, 2004).

## 92

Pennsylvania also did not provide SO 2 

## general aviation and air taxi emissions in the inv entory.
Pechan estimated the SO 2 

## emissions by applying a SO 2 

## /NO

x 

## emission ratio to the general

aviation and air taxi NO

x 

## emissions, using ratios of 0.154 and 0.095, respec tively.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

11. Rhode Island

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Rhode Island approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B-1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by county and month. Rhode Island provi ded a revised equipment population file (44000.pop) with updated populations for specific S CCs to replace the default file used in

NMIM.

Rhode Island provided emissions for aircraft, locom otive and commercial marine vessel categories for their nonroad sector CERR submittal.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

Rhode Island provided updates in September 2004 to their county-level railroad equipment

emissions. The new emissions fall under SCC 228500 2005 and replace all line haul locomotive emissions provided in their CERR submittal. Emissi on estimates for yard locomotives were also provided (SCC 2285002010).

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the fi le to address QA issues as approved by

Rhode Island.

PM 10 

## was not identified as either primary or filterable . Rhode Island authorized Pechan to change it to PM10-PRI. To avoid double counting, P echan removed the following SCCs from Rhode Island’s inventory: 2275000000, 2280002000, 2 280002020, 2280003000, and

2280003020. These emissions are accounted for unde r more specific SCCs for aircraft, and more aggregate SCCs for commercial marine.

Rhode Island did not provide PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI aircraft emissions in their inventory. Pechan developed aircraft PM 10 

## emissions for all aircraft types by applying an av erage
PM 10 

## / ‌ NO

x 

## emission ratio to the aircraft NO

x 

## emissions in their inventory. The PM 10 

## /NO

x 

## ratios used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 fo r general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, milit ary aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle siz e multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For

## 93

commercial aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25-PRI emis sions using the assumption that 97.6% of

PM 10 

## is PM 2.5 

## (ERG, 2004).

Rhode Island did not provide yard locomotive, and c ommercial marine vessel PM25-PRI emissions in their inventory. Pechan estimated the yard locomotive PM25-PRI emissions from PM10-PRI using the assumption that 90% of PM 10 

## is PM25 (EPA, 2003b). Pechan estimated the

commercial marine vessel PM25-PRI emissions from PM 10-PRI using the assumption that 92%

of PM 10 

## is PM 2.5 

## (EPA, 2003b).

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

12. Vermont

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan developed NONROAD model SCC emissions for Ve rmont using NMIM2005. Vermont approved of the default fuel input values used in N MIM2005 for weight percent oxygen, but requested that the RVP and gasoline sulfur values r eflect values used for onroad mobile source

emissions.

Pechan added aircraft emissions for Vermont from th e preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) emissions for PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were not reported in the EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. Pechan estimated PM10-PRI emissions by applying an average PM10-PRI/NO

x 

## emission ratio of 0.058 to available NO

x 

## emissions.

Commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions were estimat ed by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

Note that there are no locomotive or commercial mar ine vessel emissions in the NEI for Vermont. Where activity for any of these SCCs occu rs in Vermont, these categories are not represented in the State’s inventory.

## 94

CHAPTER V

–

ONROAD SOURCES

A. General Methods for All States

This section provides an overview of the data sourc es and QA steps used in preparing the 2002 onroad sector inventory for the MANE-VU States and in preparing the corresponding modeling inputs for the MANE-VU Version 3 modeling inventory . The onroad sector is comprised of all motorized vehicles that travel on the public highwa ys including passenger cars, light-duty trucks, minivans, sport utility vehicles, heavy-duty trucks , and buses. It should be noted that, unlike the other emission sectors, the modeling inventory inpu ts for the onroad sector do not include any emissions data. The primary modeling inputs for th e onroad sector instead are the activity inputs (vehicle miles traveled (VMT)) and SMOKE-formatted MOBILE6 input files. The SMOKE model then generates full MOBILE6 input files using the MOBILE6 inputs, speed inputs, and meteorological inputs for the episode(s) to be mode led, runs the MOBILE6 emission factor model to calculate the appropriate emission factors , and calculates emissions using the supplied VMT and additional temporal allocation factors for the VMT.

1. Data Sources

a. Source of default model data

The MANE-VU 2002 onroad emissions inventory was com piled from data supplied by the MANE-VU State agencies in the form of onroad emissi ons input data or emissions inventories either directly to MANE-VU or to EPA through their CERR submittal. States provided information in one or more of the following ways: (1) an onroad emission inventory submittal to EPA, (2) MOBILE6 inputs and VMT data in NMIM format to EPA, (3) portions of MOBILE6 inputs or full MOBILE6 input files and supporting f iles plus VMT to EPA, or (4) portions of MOBILE6 inputs or full MOBILE6 input files and supp orting files plus VMT to MANE-VU. Different procedures were followed in developing th e MANE-VU 2002 onroad emission inventory depending upon how the data were submitte d.

As discussed above, the primary data needed in prep aring the inputs for the onroad modeling files were the VMT data and MOBILE6 input files. A ll of the MANE-VU States provided VMT data, which were incorporated in the SMOKE modeling . The level of detail of the supplied VMT data and any additional processing of the VMT d ata are discussed individually by State, below, in Section B: State-Specific Methods. Ther efore, no default data were needed for the VMT inputs. Default model inputs for the SMOKE MOB ILE6 input files were needed in some

cases. The source of default information to be inc luded in these input files was the NMIM national county database, as this was also the defa ult source of data for EPA in preparing the

2002 NEI. This database includes information on mo nthly fuel data by county, control program information by county, such as inspection and maint enance (I/M) program inputs, and other fleet information, such as vehicle registration distribut ions, that may have been supplied by the States. Additionally, vehicle speed information is needed i n the SMOKE modeling files. Some States supplied this information. In cases where no speed data were supplied, the default speeds used by EPA in calculating the NEI were used. These spe eds differ by road class group and by vehicle class group.

## 95

For the SMOKE modeling, Pechan did not provide any ambient data such as temperature or humidity. Instead, the SMOKE model needs meteorolo gical input data specific to the episode(s) being modeled. Thus, although the SMOKE MOBILE6 in put files do include temperature data and in some cases humidity data, these inputs will be replaced by the SMOKE model with the appropriate episode-specific data.

b. Model inputs and revisions provided by States

The model inputs and revisions provided by the Stat es are discussed in detail in Section B, below. These inputs include VMT data, VMT temporal data, vehicle speeds, I/M program inputs, registrations distributions, and other MOBI LE6 input data.

c. Model inputs provided vs. model inputs used

Pechan prepared the following model input files for Version 3 of the MANE-VU modeling inventory:

• MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt—contains VMT and spe eds by county and SCC;

• MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt—contains VMT tempora l profiles;

• MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt—contains cross refer ences between temporal profiles and county/SCC;

• MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt—contains VMT vehicl e mix fractions;

• MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt—contains cross refer ence between MANE-VU counties and the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files;

• MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt—contains general cou nty-level information for SMOKE;

• MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt—contains hourly speed profil es (SPDPRO);

• MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt—contains cross references be tween speed profiles and MANE-VU county/SCC;

• MANEVU_2002_mcodes.txt—contains information on SCCs used in MBINV file;

• MANEVU_SMOKE_M6Inputs_MA_NJ_02022006.zip—contains m onthly SMOKEformatted MOBILE6 input files for Massachusetts and New Jersey, updated for Version
3;

• MANEVU_2002_SMOKE_M6_InputFiles032004.zip—contains monthly SMOKEformatted MOBILE6 input files for all MANE-VU State s. Files for Massachusetts and New Jersey from this zip file should be replaced by the Version 3 files dated 02/02/2006.

• MANEVU_2002_SMOKE_M6_ExternalFiles.zip—contains ext ernal data files called by the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files.

2. What Quality Assurance Steps were Performed?

This section provides a brief summary of the QA ste ps and processes that were performed in the development of the onroad sector modeling inputs fo r MANE-VU. The initial QA procedures were performed on the emissions and input data used to calculate the MANE-VU 2002 onroad

## 96

emission inventory. Some of these QA procedures ar e also relevant here to the modeling inventory as many of the inputs are either the same or start with common information.

For States submitting onroad emission inventories t o EPA, Pechan performed QA checks on the State-provided emission inventory data to ensure co mpleteness, referential integrity, and correct formatting of the data. Where necessary as a resul t of these QA checks, and with the approval of the affected State, Pechan revised the inventories to meet the necessary inventory standards. For the modeling inventory, the VMT checks included in these QA checks are relevant. Note that a Quality Assurance Plan was prepared prior to initia ting work on Version 1 (MANE-VU, 2003). This plan was applied during development of all thr ee versions of the MANE-VU inventory.

a. Data input summary spreadsheets for State review

In reviewing the data submitted for both the annual onroad inventory and the onroad modeling files, Pechan prepared a State QA report for each S tate. These reports were in the form of Excel spreadsheets. In each of the State QA reports, a p age was included that summarized the modeling inputs. This included MOBILE6 input param eters, such as I/M data, registration data, and fuel data. Columns were included indicating th e data file name, data coverage (e.g., statewide or for specific counties), data source, a ny comments regarding the data, an indication of whether any guidance was requested from the Stat e agency before proceeding, and columns for State agency approval of the listed inputs. Th ese reports were provided to each State agency and the State could either approve the inputs summa rized or provide an alternate data source or

calculation method. For States that had submitted emission inventories in NIF format, results of the NIF QA checks were also included in these State QA reports for the states to review and approve and provide alternate data or methods. Thi s table also include information on the VMT data source and any proposed methodologies needed f or processing the VMT.

b. Responses from State Agencies

The appropriate State agency staff reviewed the Sta te QA reports and provided direction for correcting QA issues either in the QA Summary Repor t Excel file or via e-mail. The modeling inputs were then revised to incorporate responses f rom the agencies.

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries

Table V-1 presents a summary of the annual 2002 Ver sion 3 MANE-VU onroad sector pollutant emissions for each MANE-VU State, as well as a regi onal total. Differences between these

Version 3 annual emission totals and the Version 2 totals documented in the January 2005 MANE-VU mobile sources inventory report are the res ult of updated data provided by New Jersey and Massachusetts. Emissions for the remain ing states have not changed. It should be

noted that these emission results are from the annu al inventory modeling. These will differ from the results obtained by the SMOKE onroad modeling. Additionally, the emissions in this table do not reflect VMT updates from Vermont that were p rovided after the Version 2 MANE-VU annual inventory had been calculated, but were incl uded in the SMOKE Version 2 and Version 3 modeling inputs.

## 97

Table V-1. Annual 2002 Onroad Sector Emissions by MANE-VU State (Tons/Year)

State VOC NO x CO SO 2 PM10-PRI PM25-PRI NH 3
Connecticut 31,755.3 68,816.2 562,124.0 1,666.9 1,580.0 1,041.6 3,293.9

Delaware 10,563.8 21,340.5 160,760.4 583.9 581.1 414.9 902.8

District of Columbia 4,895.3 8,902.0 66,017.6 271.1 222.0 153.0 397.8

Maine 23,037.4 54,686.8 410,957.8 1,803.9 1,239.1 934.4 1,467.5

Maryland 61,846.7 122,210.0 1,000,762.8 4,057.6 3,168.3 2,200.4 5,594.3

Massachusetts 57,185.5 143,367.6 1,039,100.1 4,398.8 3,407.5 2,409.9 5,499.1

New Hampshire 16,762.3 33,283.0 306,792.5 776.9 814.3 561.8 1,447.0

New Jersey 89,752.9 152,076.1 1,273,513.1 3,648.6 3,725.3 2,469.0 7,382.0

New York 287,845.2 319,732.5 3,711,149.6 10,639.5 8,457.5 5,897.7 14,680.9

Pennsylvania 176,090.3 346,471.5 2,784,196.5 10,924.1 7,351.5 5,331.2 10,532.3

Rhode Island 12,537.8 16,677.2 186,196.8 425.3 345.1 210.5 852.6

Vermont 17,287.8 20,669.9 248,247.6 893.8 669.6 482.8 934.1

Total MANE-VU 789,560.3 1,308,233.3 11,749,818.8 4 0,090.5 31,561.3 22,107.2 52,984.3



## B. State-Specific Methods

The following sections describe what modeling input s were used for each State and how these inputs were developed.

1. Connecticut

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-2 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files t hat were prepared containing information

for the State of Connecticut. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to crea te these data files.

The VMT inputs provided by Connecticut were in the form of three sets of data. This included a file with VMT by county and four road types (Expres sway, Arterial/Collector, Local, and Ramp), a set of Statewide VMT mixes at the 16 vehic le type-level for each of the four Connecticut road types, and a Statewide hourly VMT distribution file. Additional data provided by Connecticut showing the correspondence between t he four Connecticut road types and the 12 Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) road t ypes were used to first distribute the county VMT to the 12 road types. Average daily mil es were converted to annual miles by multiplying the average daily miles by 365. Pechan then developed a simple MOBILE6 input file that used the Connecticut registration distrib ution and with a separate scenario for each of the VMT mixes provided at the 16 vehicle type level. P echan used the resulting MOBILE6 output file to extract the 28 vehicle type VMT mix corresp onding to each of the four Connecticut road types. The VMT data by county and 12 road types we re then multiplied by the 28 vehicle type

VMT fractions to obtain a VMT file at the 28 vehicl e type level and 12 road type level by county (for use in calculating the annual emission invento ry). VMT from these 28 vehicle types were

## 98

then aggregated to the 12 vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file. The VMT mix fractions by vehicle type for each county and r oad type were also calculated for inclusion in

the SMOKE VMTMIX file.

Table V-2. Connecticut Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC CT Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 v ehicle

groups Default

NEI Speed profiles MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt and

MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt County/hour/road type CT

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide/r oad type CT

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## For Connecticut, speed information is contained in both the MBINV SMOKE file as well as in the SMOKE speed profile (SPDPRO) and speed cross re ference file (SPDREF) files. The speed information contained in the MBINV file is simply t he default NEI speed data. The actual speed data to be used in the modeling inventory for Conne cticut are contained in the SMOKE SPDPRO and SPDREF. The speed data from these two files sh ould overwrite the default speed information contained in the MBINV file during the SMOKE modeling. The data used to develop the speed profiles were provided by Connect icut in the form of NMIM speed input files with the fraction of VMT occurring within each of 1 4 speed bins. These speed distributions differ by hour of day and by freeways versus arteri als and collectors. Separate speed distribution files were provided by Connecticut for each county. Pechan then converted these speed data into the speed profile format needed for SMOKE—hourly av erage speeds by county and the two specified road types.

Connecticut provided the following data that were i ncorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## Statewide registration distribution;

• 

## Hourly VMT distributions;

• 

## Statewide I/M program inputs and Anaerobic Thermal Processor (ATP); and

• 

## RVP and fuel program data.

The data submitted by Connecticut indicated that Fe deral Northern reformulated gasoline is in place in the State, with an ozone season RVP of 6.8 pounds per square inch (psi). Based on the NMIM modeling that was performed for the annual emi ssion inventory, the reformulated gasoline program was modeled in the SMOKE MOBILE6 i nput files using the combination of the FUEL PROGRAM: 4 command (indicating user-suppl ied gasoline sulfur inputs), RVP command, and the OXYGENATED FUELS command. The mon thly oxygenated fuel and gasoline sulfur inputs, and the non-ozone season mo nthly RVP values were obtained from the

## 99

NMIM national county database for Connecticut. Dur ing the ozone season months, the RVP value submitted by Connecticut of 6.8 psi was model ed. The fuel data obtained from NMIM are the same for all counties in Connecticut, except Fa irfield, which shows different fuel properties, but all represent reformulated gasoline. These valu es for both Fairfield and the remaining counties differed by season (i.e., the ozone season from May through September, transition months of March, April, October, and November, and the winter months of December, January, and February). Statewide diesel sulfur values mode led from NMIM were 367 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sul fur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 353 ppm sulfur in the s pring and fall months.

Data provided by Connecticut indicated that the Sta te follows the OTC low emission vehicle (LEV) program vehicle implementation schedule. The refore, the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Connecticut.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

2. Delaware

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-3 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files t hat were prepared containing information

for the State of Delaware. This table notes the le vel of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create t hese data files.

Delaware provided VMT data in the form of the NEI N IF PE table as well as in the NMIM BaseYearVMT table format. Additionally, Delaware p rovided monthly VMT fractions developed from VMT counts on a variety of road type s. These monthly VMT fractions were provided for each of the Delaware counties. Since the data in the NEI NIF PE table were at the level of detail needed for the SMOKE MBINV file, th e format of the VMT data was simply

converted from the NIF format to the SMOKE MBINV fo rmat. Similarly, the monthly VMT fractions were converted to the profile format need ed in the SMOKE MTPRO file, with the appropriate cross references in the MTREF file. Th e average speeds provided by Delaware at the county/road type level were included in the SMO KE MBINV file.

## 100 Table V-3. Delaware Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Fil es

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC DE Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road t ype DE VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by county/road type DE

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## The fuel data submitted by Delaware was based on th e NMIM defaults with the NMIM October data replaced by the NMIM November data. The refor mulated gas fuel parameters were modeled in the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files by using t he combination of the OXYGENATED FUELS, FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sul fur contents) commands for each

month. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 300 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 280 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 290 ppm sulfur in the spring and fal l months.

Data provided by Delaware indicated that the State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV pr ogram LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National L EV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Delaware.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

3. District of Columbia

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-4 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files t hat were prepared containing information

for the District of Columbia. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to crea te these data files.

## 101

Table V-4. District of Columbia Onroad Data in SMO KE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC DC Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type DC VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Road type D C

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## The District of Columbia provided 2002 VMT data in the form of the NMIM BaseYearVMT

table. This table included VMT at the 28 vehicle t ype level for each of the six urban road types

in the District of Columbia. VMT from these 28 veh icle types were then aggregated to the 12 vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file . The VMT mix fractions by vehicle type for each county and road type were also calcul ated for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. The District also provided a spreadsheet inc luding the daily average weighted speed by roadway class. These speeds were incorporated in t he SMOKE MBINV file. The District of Columbia provided the following data that were inco rporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## District-wide registration distribution;

• 

## I/M program and ATP inputs; and

• 

## Weekday trip length distribution file.

The District of Columbia specified that the NMIM fu el program default data for the District should be used for the MANE-VU modeling. This incl uded reformulated gasoline district wide, modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for g asoline sulfur contents) commands

for each month. Statewide diesel sulfur values mod eled from NMIM were 329 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 324 ppm sul fur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 326 ppm sulfur in the s pring and fall months.

Data provided by the District of Columbia indicated that the District follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore , the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for the District of Co lumbia.

## 102 c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for the District of Columbi a should include the OXYGENATED FUELS command to fully model reformulated gasoline in the District of Columbia. This command was inadvertently left out of the SMOKE MOB ILE6 files.

4. Maine

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-5 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files t hat were prepared containing information

for the State of Maine. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create t hese data files.

Table V-5. Maine Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC ME Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road t ype ME VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide/r oad type Default

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## Maine provided 2002 average daily VMT by county and 12 roadway types. Maine had no

information available on the distribution of VMT am ong vehicle types. Therefore, Pechan developed the VMT by county, roadway type, and vehi cle type by using the default MOBILE6 2002 VMT mix by vehicle type. These VMT data were converted to annual VMT by multiplying the average daily VMT by 365. The MOBI LE6 VMT default mix fractions by vehicle type for 2002 were included for Maine in th e SMOKE VMTMIX file. Maine also provided average speed data by county and roadway t ype. These data were included in the

SMOKE MBINV file.

Maine provided the following data that were incorpo rated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## I/M program inputs and ATP inputs for Cumberland Co unty only; and

• 

## Monthly average RVP data.

Statewide diesel sulfur values were obtained from t he NMIM defaults for Maine. A diesel sulfur value of 390 ppm sulfur was modeled in the summer months (June, July, and August), 338 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 364 ppm sulfur in the spring

and fall months.

## 103

Data provided by Maine indicated that the State fol lows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV pr ogram LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National L EV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Maine.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

5. Maryland

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-6 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files t hat were prepared containing information for the State of Maryland. This table notes the le vel of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create t hese data files.

Maryland submitted annual VMT data in the form of a NIF tblMobilePE table. This included VMT by county, 12 vehicle types, and 12 road types. These VMT data were then converted to

the format needed for the SMOKE MBINV file. Pechan calculated VMT mix fractions from the VMT data supplied by Maryland to obtain the VMT mix es by county and road type contained in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. In addition, Maryland provi ded monthly VMT distribution data by road type. Pechan converted these data to the form at needed for the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files. The same set of monthly temporal prof iles were applied to all counties in Maryland. Maryland also provided a spreadsheet sho wing the average speed Statewide for each of the 12 roadway types. These speed data were inc luded in the SMOKE MBINV file.

Maryland provided the following data that were inco rporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## County-specific registration distribution;

• 

## County-specific diesel sales fractions;

• 

## I/M program inputs and ATP inputs to be applied in the 14 I/M counties; and

• 

## Statewide monthly diesel sulfur content data.

Maryland indicated that the NMIM default fuel param eters for Maryland should be used in the MANE-VU modeling. This fuel data includes reformul ated gasoline in 14 of the Maryland counties. The reformulated gasoline program was mo deled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands for each month. Maryland provided monthly Statewide diesel sulfur values. These valu es ranged from 455 ppm sulfur to 500 ppm

## 104

sulfur. These values were included in the correspo nding monthly SMOKE MOBILE6 input

files.

Table V-6. Maryland Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Fil es

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC MD Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road t ype MD VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type MD Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Statewide monthly by road type MD

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## Data provided by Maryland indicated that the State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV pr ogram LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National L EV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Maryland affecting the modeling inventory files.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for Maryland should include the OXYGENATED FUELS command to fully model reformulated gasoline in the Maryland counties that implement the reformulated gasoline program. This command was in advertently left out of the Maryland

SMOKE MOBILE6 files.

## 105 6. Massachusetts

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-7 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files t hat were prepared containing information

for the State of Massachusetts. This table notes t he level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to crea te these data files.

Table V-7. Massachusetts Onroad Data in SMOKE Inpu t Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC MA Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road t ype MA VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type Default Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by county MA

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## The Version 3 MANE-VU onroad modeling for Massachus etts differed from the Version 2 modeling, based on updates provided by Massachusett s in December 2005. The primary changes for Massachusetts from Version 3 is the use of updated 2002 VMT data and vehicle speed date. Massachusetts provided a spreadsheet c ontaining revised VMT values and vehicle speeds for 2002 by county and SCC. Pechan prepared the revised Massachusetts VMT data and the speed data in the format of the SMOKE MBINV fil e. Using the revised VMT data by SCC, Pechan calculated the updated VMT mixes by vehicle type for each county and road type in Massachusetts and formatted the resulting data to b e included in the SMOKE VMTMIX file.

The original VMT data submitted by Massachusetts in cluded VMT for each of the four seasons. Pechan used these data to develop monthly VMT tempo ral profiles. Seasonal VMT was assigned to the months in that season based on the ratio of the number of days in a specific month to the number of days in the season. Pechan then formatted the monthly temporal VMT

allocation factors for inclusion in the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files.

## 106

Massachusetts provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## Statewide registration distribution;

• 

## Statewide I/M program inputs and ATP inputs;

• 

## RVP and fuel program data;

• 

## Diesel sulfur content of 350 ppm sulfur year-round and statewide; and

• 

## Massachusetts-specific LEV and Tier 2 implementatio n files.

Northern reformulated gasoline was modeled statewid e throughout the State, with a RVP value of 6.7 psi during the ozone season and 13.5 psi dur ing the remaining months, based on inputs provided by Massachusetts. The section below on QA issues for Massachusetts discusses the fuel inputs modeled in the Version 3 SMOKE MOBILE6 input files in more detail. Massachusetts provided the necessary inputs to mode l the State’s LEV implementation schedule and Tier 2 data, which differ from the OTC-LEV prog ram and from the default MOBILE6 Tier 2

data.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

In addition to the VMT updates, Pechan revised the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files for

Massachusetts for Version 3. This was done because Version 2 of the MANE-VU modeling inventory was prepared using the default setting of MOBILE6 to model reformulated gasoline (i.e., using the command line “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”) . Since the time that the Version 2 inventory was created, EPA found a bug with the sul fur content values used when the default reformulated gasoline command is used. To eliminat e this problem, Pechan created revised SMOKE MOBILE6 input files for Massachusetts that mo del reformulated gasoline by explicitly setting the RVP, gasoline sulfur contents, and gaso line oxygen contents. The gasoline sulfur contents and gasoline oxygen contents were set acco rding to the default parameters laid out in the MOBILE6 user’s guide. The summer (May through September) sulfur content is 129 ppm in 2002 and the winter sulfur content is 279 ppm in 20 02. The summer gasoline contains 2.1 percent oxygen, with MTBE as the oxygenate. The wi nter gasoline contains 1.5 percent oxygen in 70 percent of the fuel having MTBE as the oxygen ate, and 3.5 percent oxygen in 30 percent of the fuel having ETOH as the oxygenate. The RVP val ues were not changed from those modeled in Version 2 (6.7 psi in the summer and 13.5 psi in the winter).

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

7. New Hampshire

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-8 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files t hat were prepared containing information for the State of New Hampshire. This table notes t he level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to c reate these data files.

## 107 Table V-8. New Hampshire Onroad Data in SMOKE Inpu t Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC NH Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road t ype NH VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide N H

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## The VMT inputs provided by New Hampshire were in th e form of summer day VMT by county or nonattainment area and roadway type. In additio n, New Hampshire provided a Statewide VMT mix distribution by 16 vehicle types in the MOB ILE6 files provided by the State. Pechan then developed a simple MOBILE6 input file that use d the New Hampshire Statewide registration distribution and the Statewide VMT mix by vehicle type. Pechan used the resulting MOBILE6 output file to extract the 28 vehicle type VMT mix to be applied Statewide to the county/roadway type VMT data. Summer day miles wer e converted to annual miles by using national data from the Federal Highway Administrati on’s Travel Volume Trends which provides 2002 monthly VMT for groups of road categories. Ad ditionally, the VMT data from the three New Hampshire nonattainment areas represented four counties. To allocate these VMT by county, Pechan first totaled the VMT data from thes e three nonattainment areas by roadway type. Then, using ratios developed from the preliminary 2 002 NEI VMT, Pechan allocated the grouped VMT by county and roadway type. With VMT f or the entire State at the county/roadway type level of detail, Pechan then mu ltiplied the VMT data by the 28 vehicle type

VMT fractions to obtain a VMT file at the 28 vehicl e type level and 12 roadway type level by county for use in preparing the annual onroad emiss ion inventory. VMT from these 28 vehicle types were then aggregated to the 12 vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file. The VMT mix fractions by vehicle type for each coun ty and road type were also calculated for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. New Hampshire also provided a spreadsheet including the average speed by roadway class for each county or county group. These speeds were incorporated in the SMOKE MBINV file.

New Hampshire provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## Statewide registration distribution; and

• 

## Statewide ATP inputs.

New Hampshire specified that the NMIM fuel program default data for New Hampshire should be used for the MANE-VU modeling. This included re formulated gasoline in four counties, modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for g asoline sulfur contents) commands

for each month. Statewide diesel sulfur values mod eled from NMIM were 400 ppm sulfur in the

## 108

summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sul fur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 370 ppm sulfur in the s pring and fall months.

Data provided by New Hampshire indicated that the S tate follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OT C-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input fi les, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model

year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Through the State QA report process, New Hampshire provided updated inputs for VMT and speeds that were incorporated in the modeling inven tory inputs.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for the four New Hampshire that implement reformulated gasoline

should include the OXYGENATED FUELS command to full y model the benefits reformulated gasoline. This command was inadvertently left out of the SMOKE MOBILE6 files.

8. New Jersey

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-9 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files t hat were prepared containing information for the State of New Jersey. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create t hese data files.

Table V-9. New Jersey Onroad Data in SMOKE Input F iles

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC NJ Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 v ehicle

groups Default

NEI VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type NJ Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by 3 county groups and weekday/weekend NJ

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## Updates were made to the Version 2 MOBILE6 SMOKE in puts for New Jersey in December 2005 to create Version 3, based on revised data pro vided by the State. New Jersey provided the following files:

## 109 • 

## a set of SMOKE MOBILE6 input files by county and mo nth;

• 

## NJ_2002_mbinv.txt file that contained revised VMT a nd speeds by county and SCC, generated by NJDEP in August 2005, in SMOKE format;

• 

## amptref.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805_NJVMT.txt—a SMOK E-formatted file containing county/SCC-level temporal profile cross-references;

• 

## amptro.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805_NJVMT.txt—a SMOKE -formatted file containing county-specific VMT temporal profiles prepared by N JDEP in August 2005; and

• 

## zip files containing external files needed to run t he SMOKE MOBILE6 files.

After an initial review of these files, Pechan did not note any differences in the SMOKE

MOBILE6 files from the Version 2 files. Pechan the n confirmed with New Jersey that the only changes from the Version 2 date were in the VMT dat a. The VMT and speed data by county and SCC in the MBINV file provided by New Jersey were c opied to the MANE-VU SMOKE MBINV file, replacing the VMT and speed data from t he Version 2 SMOKE MBINV file for New Jersey. The speed data included by New Jersey are the default NEI speeds by road type and vehicle type. Using the new VMT data provided by N ew Jersey, Pechan calculated a revised set of VMT mix fractions by vehicle type and included t hese in the Version 3 SMOKE VMTMIX file. Pechan pasted the temporal profiles provided for New Jersey into the SMOKE MTPRO file. This included monthly temporal profiles and diurnal temporal profiles. The diurnal temporal profiles were applied to both weekdays and weekends. Similarly the temporal cross reference data included in the file provided by New Jersey was pasted into the SMOKE MTREF

file for MANE-VU Version 3.

The following New Jersey-provided were included in the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## Statewide registration distribution;

• 

## Statewide diesel sales fractions;

• 

## Statewide I/M program and ATP inputs; and

• 

## Diesel sulfur content data (340 ppm statewide).

Northern reformulated gasoline was modeled statewid e throughout the State, using NMIM fuel program input defaults for New Jersey. The section below on QA issues for New Jersey discusses the fuel inputs modeled in the Version 3 SMOKE MOBILE6 input files in more detail.

Data provided by New Jersey indicated that the Stat e follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV pr ogram LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National L EV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

As discussed above for New Jersey, the Version 2 Ne w Jersey SMOKE MOBILE6 input files modeled reformulated gasoline using the command lin e “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”, which is the default method for modeling reformulated gasoli ne with MOBILE6. To eliminate the effects

## 110

of the MOBILE6 reformulated gasoline bug from the S MOKE MOBILE6 inputs, Pechan explicitly modeled the reformulated gasoline progra m in the New Jersey MOBILE6 input files by explicitly modeling the appropriate settings of the RVP, oxygenated fuel content commands, and gasoline sulfur commands. The values for oxyge nated fuel settings and gasoline sulfur contents by month were extracted from the NMIM coun ty-level database used in developing the annual emissions inventory for the MANE-VU Version 2 onroad emissions inventory.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

9. New York

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-10 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing

information for the State of New York. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

Table V-10. New York Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Fi les

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC NY Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 v ehicle

groups Default

NEI Speed profiles MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt and

MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt County/hour/road type NY

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type NY Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by 3 county

groups NY

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## VMT for New York was provided in the form of a NIF PE table. These VMT data were

extracted and included in the SMOKE MBINV file. VM T mix fractions by vehicle type were

calculated from these VMT data and included in the SMOKE VMTMIX file.

New York provided a spreadsheet with average speeds in each of four daily time periods by county and road type. Pechan converted these speed data to the SMOKE SPDPRO format, assigning the speed for a given time period to all hours included in that time period. Pechan also prepared the SMOKE SPDREF file to appropriately cro ss reference each county and road type to the corresponding hourly speed profile. Because these more detailed speed files were provid ed for New York, the average speed by road type and co unty in the MBINV file was populated with default NEI speeds.

## 111

New York also provided spreadsheets showing monthly VMT by county and roadtype. After processing these VMT values to develop monthly temp oral factors, Pechan observed that there were only three unique monthly profiles in this dat a set. These three profiles were then added to

the SMOKE MTPRO file. Pechan then matched each cou nty and road type in the State to the corresponding monthly VMT profile in the SMOKE MTRE F file.

New York provided the following data that were inco rporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## Registration distributions—one for the New York met ropolitan area and one for the rest of the State;

• 

## Diesel sales fractions—one for the New York metropo litan area and one for the rest of the State;

• 

## Statewide mileage accumulation rate input;

• 

## Monthly RVP data—one set for the New York metropoli tan area and one for the rest of the State;

• 

## Reformulated gasoline program inputs for affected c ounties modeled with MOBILE6 defaults (i.e., “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”);

• 

## I/M program inputs for affected counties;

• 

## Statewide ATP inputs;

• 

## Hourly VMT distributions by county group;

• 

## Start distributions by county;

• 

## Diesel sulfur content data (400 ppm statewide).

New York also provided the necessary input files to model the State’s LEV program implementation schedule, which differs from the OTC LEV program. New York also provided MOBILE6 Tier 2 modeling files to be used along with the New York LEV program inputs. These inputs were included in the SMOKE MOBILE6 mod eling.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for New York affecting the modeling inventory files.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

10. Pennsylvania

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-11 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of Pennsylvania. This ta ble notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information u sed to create these data files.

## 112 Table V-11. Pennsylvania Onroad Data in SMOKE Inpu t Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC PA Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road t ype PA VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type PA Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by county PA

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## Pennsylvania provided a database file (NEIANN02.dbf ) that contained the VMT and speed data by county, roadway type, and vehicle type. This in cluded the same VMT used in the calculation of the annual onroad inventory submitted by Pennsyl vania for MANE-VU. Pechan converted the data from this database file into VMT and speed data in the format of the SMOKE MBINV file. From the VMT data, Pechan calculated VMT fra ctions by vehicle type by county and road type for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. Penns ylvania also provided estimates of VMT by month for each county. Pechan converted these d ata to monthly allocation factors in the format needed by the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files. A separate monthly profile was developed for each county, but applied to all road types within that county.

Pennsylvania provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## Registration distributions for each individual coun ty;

• 

## I/M program and ATP inputs for affected Philadelphi a and Pittsburgh area counties (inputs differ for the two areas);

• 

## Monthly RVP data for all counties including 7.8 psi RVP program from May through September for Pittsburgh counties;

• 

## Reformulated gasoline for the 5-county Philadelphia area modeled with MOBILE6 defaults (i.e., “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”); and

• 

## Diesel sulfur content data (500 ppm statewide).

Data provided by Pennsylvania indicated that the St ate follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV pr ogram LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National L EV program in the 2001 model year.

## 113 b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Pennsylvania affec ting the modeling inventory files.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

11. Rhode Island

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-12 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing

information for the State of Rhode Island. This ta ble notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information u sed to create these data files.

Table V-12. Rhode Island Onroad Data in SMOKE Inpu t Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC RI Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County group/ road type RI

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide R I

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## Rhode Island provided a spreadsheet with the 2002 V MT as well as Statewide 2002 VMT fractions by 16 vehicle types. Pechan prepared a s imple MOBILE6 input file including this Rhode Island 2002 VMT mix by vehicle type and the 2 002 Rhode Island registration distribution. The VMT mix in the MOBILE6 output fi le at the 28 vehicle type level was then used to distribute the VMT by vehicle category. Th e 2002 daily VMT was at the State level, broken down by the 12 roadway types. To allocate t hese VMT data to the county/road type level of detail, Pechan summed the VMT from the prelimina ry version of EPA’s 2002 NEI for Rhode Island first by State and roadway type and then by county and roadway type. Pechan calculated county/roadway type VMT fractions by dividing the V MT at the county/roadway type level by the State/roadway type VMT for the same roadway typ e. These fractions were then multiplied by the VMT supplied by Rhode Island at the State/ro adway type level of detail to obtain county/roadway type VMT data. These county/roadway type VMT data were then multiplied by the 28 vehicle type VMT fractions to obtain VMT at the level of detail needed to populate the NMIM BaseYearVMT table for calculating the annual i nventory and were then summed to the 16-vehicle type level of detail for use in the SMOK E MBINV file. The data were also converted from daily VMT to annual by multiplying the average daily VMT by 365. VMT mix fractions

## 114

from this final data set were then formatted in the SMOKE VMTMIX format at the State level of detail. Statewide speeds by road type, as provided by Rhode Island, were included in the

SMOKE MBINV file.

Rhode Island provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## Statewide registration distribution; and

• 

## Statewide I/M program inputs.

Data for fuel parameters were obtained from the NMI M national county database for Rhode Island. This included reformulated gasoline Statew ide, modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) command s for each month. These values differed by season, but were consistent Statewide. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 400 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June , July, and August), 340 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February) , and 370 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall

months.

The NMIM default LEV program for Rhode Island was m odeled, which includes the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Rhode Island.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

The Rhode Island SMOKE MOBILE6 input files did not include the OXYGENATED FUELS command. This should have been used to fully chara cterize the parameters of reformulated gasoline that is used Statewide in Rhode Island.

12. Vermont

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-13 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing

information for the State of Vermont. This table n otes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

## 115 Table V-13. Vermont Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Fil es

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC VT Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/veh icle group (light-duty vs. heavy-duty) VT

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type VT Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly statewide

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## Vermont submitted VMT data in the format of the NIF PE table. Vermont then provided updated VMT data for three road classifications (ru ral minor collectors, rural local roads, and urban local roads) in December 2004, after the time that these changes could be included in the MANE-VU annual onroad emission inventory. However, the updated VMT were included in the MANE-VU Version 3 onroad SMOKE modeling files. Thi s VMT change resulted in a

Statewide decrease in VMT from about 9.5 billion mi les to about 7.8 billion miles. As a result, the SMOKE modeling performed by MANE-VU will not ma tch the MANE-VU emission inventory for Vermont. The VMT data were converted to the SMOKE MBINV file format.

VMT mix fractions were calculated from the VMT data and included in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. Vermont also provided information on the tem poral allocation of VMT. From these data, Pechan prepared a monthly VMT profile for Vermont a nd included the data in the SMOKE

MTPRO and MTREF files.

Vermont provided information on Statewide speeds by roadway type. These speeds differed for light-duty vehicles and heavy-duty vehicles. Pecha n incorporated this speed information into the

SMOKE MBINV file.

Vermont provided the following data that were incor porated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• 

## Statewide registration distribution;

• 

## Statewide I/M program inputs; and

• 

## RVP data.

The RVP data provided by Vermont were based on data from a local gasoline tank farm and resulted in an RVP value of 8.5 psi during the ozon e season months (May through September) and 9.47 psi for the remaining months. Data for fu el parameters other than RVP (e.g., diesel and gasoline fuel sulfur content) were obtained from th e NMIM national county database for Vermont. These values differed by season, but were consistent Statewide. Statewide diesel

## 116

sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 300 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 290 ppm sulfur in the winter months (Decem ber, January, and February), and 295 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months.

The NMIM default LEV program for Vermont was modele d, which includes Vermont’s Statespecific LEV implementation schedule.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Through the State QA report process, Vermont provid ed a missing registration data file, RVP

data and revised VMT.

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi ons?

None identified by the State.

## 117

CHAPTER VI

–

BIOGENIC SOURCES

A. General Methods for all States

1. What Data Sources Were Used?

Biogenic emissions for the time period from January 1, 2002 – December 31, 2002 were calculated by the New York State Department of Envi ronmental Conservation (NYSDEC) for all of the MANE-VU states using the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS) version 3.12 integrated within SMOKE2.1. The inventory was prepa red at the state-level for CO, nitrous oxide (NO), and VOC.

General information about BEIS is available at http ://www.epa.gov/AMD/biogen.html while documentation about biogenic emissions processing w ithin SMOKE2.1 is available at http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/products/smoke/version2. 1/html/ch06s10.html and http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/products/smoke/version2. 1/html/ch06s17.html. Note that the

SMOKE documentation refers to BEIS3.09 and has not yet been updated for BEIS3.12. This affects the number of species modeled as well as th e use of different speciation profiles. However, the general processing approach has not ch anged from BEIS3.09 to BEIS3.12. In short, this processing approach is as follows and w as utilized by NYSDEC for its biogenic emission processing for MANE-VU and the OTC modelin g:

• Normbeis3 reads gridded land use data and emissions factors and produces gridded normalized biogenic emissions for 34 species/compou nds. The gridded land use file utilized by NYSDEC includes the fractional coverage of 230 different land use types for each of the 172 * 172 12-km grid cells in the M ANE-VU/OTC modeling domain. In a separate BEIS3.12 input file, both summer and winter emissions factors for each species/compound are provided for each of the 230 l and use types. On output,

Normbeis3 generates a file B3GRD 

## which contains gridded summer and winter emission fluxes for the modeling domain that are no rmalized to 30 °C and a photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) of 1000 μmol/ m 2 

## s. In addition, gridded summer and winter leaf area indices (LAI) are also written to B3GRD



## .

• Tmpbeis3 reads the gridded, normalized emissions file B3GRD and meteorological data from the MCIP-processed MM5 meteorological fie lds generated by the University of Maryland for MANE-VU/OTC modeling. S pecifically, the following MM5/MCIP meteorological variables are used by Tmpbeis3 to compute hourspecific, gridded biogenic emissions from the norma lized emission fluxed contained in B3GRD: layer-1 air temperature (“TA”), layer-1 p ressure (“PRES”), total incoming solar radiation at the surface (“RGRND”), and convective (“RC”) and nonconvective (“RN”) rainfall. Additionally, the emis sions for the 34 species/compounds modeled by BEIS3.12 are converted to CO, NO, and the CB-IV VOC species utilized in CMAQ via the use of the BEI S3.12-CB-IV speciation profile. Furthermore, an external file, BIOSEASON, was utilized to decide whether to use summer or winter emissions factors for any g iven grid cell on any given day. This file was generated by the SMOKE2.1 utility Metscan based on MM5 layer-1 air

## 118 temperatures to determine the date of the last spri ng frost and first fall frost at each grid cell. Summer emission factors are used by Tmpbeis3 for the time period between the day of the last spring frost and the da y of the first fall frost at any given grid cell, and winter emission factors are used for the remaining time period.

Documentation for the Metscan utility is available at http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd / products/smoke/version2.1/html/ch05s07.html. An an imated GIF file showing the BIOSEASON file used by NYSDEC can be found at ftp:/ /ftp.dec.state.ny.us/dar/ air_research/chogrefe/biog_reports/b3season_movie.g if.

• For reporting purposes, the hourly, speciated, grid ded emissions were aggregated to the county level for each day. For any given grid cell, emissions were distributed among the counties intersecting this grid cell in p roportion to the area of each of these counties within the grid cell. The area gridding s urrogates needed for this aggregation are based on a file obtained from EPA v ia http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ chief/emch/spatial/new/bgpro.2km_041604.us.gz, foll owed by windowing for the MANE-VU/OTC modeling domain.

2. Version 3 Emissions Summary

Table VI-1 presents a State-level summary of the an nual biogenic source emissions in Version 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. The annual emission s are based on the sum of the daily emissions prepared using the modeling approach prev iously discussed.

Table VI-1. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Biogenic Source

Emissions by State (Tons/Year)

State CO NO VOC* Connecticut 6,889 560 64,017 Delaware 4,274 990 46,343

District of Columbia 150 30 1,726 Maine 64,936 2,018 600,205 Maryland 18,351 2,934 210,104
Massachusetts 11,594 1,257 113,958 New Hampshire 14,306 482 141,894 New Jersey 14,058 1,813 181,617 New York 63,436 8,313 492,487 Pennsylvania 59,946 8,646 585,272 Rhode Island 1,764 211 19,233
Vermont 14,745 1,142 118,377
MANE-VU 274,451 28,396 2,575,232 * VOC emissions were calculated by adding the emiss ions for the following pollutants: ALD2, ETH, FORM, ISOP, NR, OL E, PAR, TERB, TOL, XYL.



## B. State-Specific Methods

No state-specific methods were used in Version 3 of the MANE-VU inventory for biogenic

emissions.

## 119

CHAPTER VII. TEMPORAL, SPECIATION, AND SPATIAL ALLO CATION

PROFILES AND PREPARATION OF SMOKE (IDA) AND RPO DAT A EXCHANGE PROTOCOL (NIF 3.0) FORMATS

Table VII-1 provides a summary of the file names an d documentation used for modeling inputs for Version 3 of MANE-VU’s 2002 inventory for point , area, nonroad, and onroad sources. The final input files used for temporal allocation, spe ciation, and spatial allocation of emissions were developed for Version 1 of the 2002 inventory and d elivered to MARAMA during January 2005 (MANE-VU, 2005). These files were developed starti ng with the latest model input files available from EPA and then revised to include upda tes needed for the MANE-VU region or to add SCCs and profile assignments not included in th e initial EPA data sets. The files were revised between September 2004 and January 2005 to incorporate comments provided by

MANE-VU. Files in Table VII-1 with a date that is later than January 2005 were prepared to support modeling for Version 3. The notes column i n the table identifies the modifications made to the files if the files were changed after this d ate. Otherwise, files with a date later than January 2005 were either provided by a state agency or were obtained from EPA and used for modeling Version 3.

The remainder of this chapter provides a brief summ ary of the revisions made to the EPA data sets prepared for Version 1 of the 2002 MANE-VU inv entory and subsequently carried for the modeling for Version 3. Sections A, B, and C of th is chapter discuss how the temporal allocation, speciation, and spatial allocation prof iles, respectively, were developed. Section D of this chapter describes how the emissions inventory data were prepared in the SMOKE (IDA) and RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0) Formats.

A. Temporal Profiles

1. Point and Area Sources

The most recent SMOKE temporal cross-reference file s available from EPA during the summer of 2004 were used as the starting point for develop ing the cross-reference files for point and area sources. The following 3 classes of modifications were completed to improve the temporal allocation input files:

• Update temporal cross-reference to assign an existi ng profile in the default SMOKE profiles for SCCs in the MANE-VU inventory

• Create a new temporal cross-reference to an existin g profile in the default SMOKE profiles for SCCs in the MANE-VU inventory; the cro ss-reference did not previously exist in the default SMOKE files but the profile di d exist.

• Create new temporal profiles and cross-references f or SCCs in the MANE-VU inventory; neither the cross-reference nor profiles for the MANE-VU SCCs previously existed in the default SMOKE files.

## 120 a. Point Sources

A total of 30 point SCCs existed in the MANE-VU poi nt source inventory that were not in the point source cross-reference file; therefore, the S CCs were added to the cross-reference file and assigned to existing profiles based on the assignme nt of similar SCCs already assigned to the profiles. Table II-2 lists the SCCs along with the state and county FIPS where they occurred in the MANE-VU inventory. Temporal profiles could not be identified for the SCCs listed in Table VII-3 due to either the SCC being shorter than 8-di gits or the lack of information about the source categories for identifying an appropriate pr ofile assignment. These SCCs were assigned the default profile by SMOKE.

b. Area Sources

For area sources, the improvements to the EPA cross -reference file included updates to existing profiles in the file based on MANE-VU-specific data (see Table VII-4), addition of SCCs that were assigned to existing profiles based on the ass ignment of similar SCCs already assigned to the profiles (see Table VII-5), and addition of new SCCs and profiles based on MANE-VU- or RPO-specific data (see Table VII-6).

Additional cross-referencing information used to re vise the temporal cross-reference file included MANE-VU county-level information for resid ential wood combustion, monthly temporal profiles developed for NH 3 

## source categories using the Carnegie Mellon Univer sity (CMU) model, and a Delaware-specific cross-referenc e file associated with the Delaware inventory. The additions of new SCCs and new profi les shown in Table VII-6 mostly apply to the state of Delaware (State FIPS=10). For the FIP S column, the “-9” designation means the cross-reference is applied for all counties that do not have a county or state-specific SCC crossreference record. These changes to the temporal cr oss-reference file allowed for the assignment of a non-flat temporal profile (262= uniform monthl y, 7=uniform weekly and 24=uniform diurnal) to 95% of the SCCs in the area inventory.

2. Nonroad Sources

Nonroad sources used the same temporal profile and cross-reference files as area sources.

3. Onroad Sources

For onroad sources, the following States provided t heir own data to update the default temporal profile files and the temporal cross reference file s: Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont. Each of these States provided VMT information that could be used to deve lop monthly temporal profiles. The data were provided in a variety of formats, ranging from monthly or seasonal VMT to SMOKEformatted monthly VMT temporal profiles. Where nec essary, the monthly or seasonal VMT data were converted into the SMOKE monthly temporal profile format. In addition, New Jersey provided information for diurnal temporal profiles. However, the level of detail or variability provided in these monthly profiles varied by State. Connecticut’s and Delaware’s profiles each varied by county and road type. Maryland’s profile s applied Statewide, with variability in the

## 121

profiles by road type. Massachusetts’ profiles var ied by county, road type, and vehicle type. Both New Jersey and New York provided information f or three monthly temporal profiles, each used throughout one of the three county groups in e ach State. The Pennsylvania profiles varied by county, but not by road type. Vermont provided information for a single monthly temporal profile to be used throughout the State.

B. Speciation Profiles

1. Point and Area Sources

The most recent SMOKE speciation cross-reference fi les available from EPA during the summer of 2004 were used as the starting point for develop ing the cross-reference files for point and area sources. These files were revised to complete SCC assignments for the Carbon Bond IV (CBIV) with PM mechanism for point and area sources. In addition, sulfur tagging species were added to the REMSAD7 CB-IV with PM mechanism (see T able VII-1).

a. Point Sources

Thirty-one SCCs in the MANE-VU point source invento ry did not have chemical speciation profile assignments for the CB-IV with PM mechanism in the default SMOKE chemical crossreference file. For 10 of the SCCs, assignments fo r VOC and PM 2.5 

## were added to the speciation cross-reference file based on the speciation profil e codes assigned to similar SCCs. Table VII-7 shows the SCCs where an SCC speciation cross-refere nce record was added, the VOC and PM 2.5 

## speciation profile code assigned, and the method us ed to assign the profiles. Assignments were not completed for the remaining 21 point source SCC s because of a lack of information on the emission sources needed to complete the assignments (see Table VII-8 for the list of the SCCs).

b. Area Sources

Speciation profile assignments were completed for m any area source SCCs for the CB-IV with PM mechanism and were documented in separate spread sheet files provided to MARAMA during September 2004. Assignments for VOC and PM 2.5 

## were added to the speciation crossreference file based on the speciation profile code s assigned to similar SCCs. Note that the transport fractions for fugitive dust were applied as a part of the modeling effort to adjust the mass emissions in Version 3 of the inventory.

2. Nonroad Sources

No updates to the speciation profiles or speciation assignments for nonroad sources were provided by the MANE-VU States.

3. Onroad Sources

No updates to the speciation profiles or speciation assignments for onroad sources were provided by the MANE-VU States.

## 122

C. Spatial Allocation Profiles

The most recent spatial profile data files availabl e from EPA during the summer of 2004 were used as the starting point for developing the spati al profile file for point and area sources. A detailed description of this surrogate dataset was provided in a file named “surrogate_
documentation_workbook052804.xls” from EPA’s websit e at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ chief/emch/spatial/newsurrogate.html. Many SCCs in the MANE-VU inventory did not have surrogate assignments in the default SMOKE gridding cross-reference file. About 200 SCC assignments were added to the gridding cross-refere nce file. The assignments were based on matching surrogate descriptions from the EPA99 surr ogate data with the SCC descriptions.

No updates to the spatial allocation files for nonr oad and onroad sources were provided by the

MANE-VU States.

D. Preparation of SMOKE (IDA) and RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0)

Formats

Table VII-9 identifies the mass emissions and SMOKE input files for Version 3 of the MANE-VU point, area, nonroad, and onroad inventorie s.

The SMOKE input file format contains one field for storing daily emissions for each pollutant. The area source inventory contains summer day, wint er day, and average day emissions depending on the state and source category. Thus, two sets of SMOKE input files were prepared for the area source inventory. One file contains a nnual, summer day, and average day emissions and the other file contains annual, winter day, and average day emissions. If summer day and average day emissions were provided for the same pr ocess and pollutant in the inventory, the summer day value was included in the SMOKE input fi le. If winter day and average day emissions were provided for the same process and po llutant in the inventory, the winter day value was included in the SMOKE input file.

The point source inventory contains summer day and winter day emissions. Two sets of SMOKE input files were prepared for point sources a s well (one file containing annual and summer day emissions and the other containing annua l and winter day emissions).

Table VII-10 provides the unique list of the start date, end date, and emission type combinations for daily emissions in the point and area source in ventories that were used to define summer, winter, and average day emissions. This table also shows the names of the SMOKE input files in

which the emissions are included.

For onroad sources, daily emissions were calculated by SMOKE using the monthly MOBILE6 input files included in the SMOKE input files.

The nonroad IDA file only has annual total emission s. The values in the “typical day” column

are zero. Annual total emissions were allocated for each hour using the monthly, weekly, and diurnal profiles described in Section A.2 of this c hapter.C-123Table VII-1. Profiles, Cross-references, and Documentation for Model Inputsfor Version 3 of 2002 MANE-VU InventoryDescription File Name FormatDate ofFile usedforVersion 3Size(Bytes) NotesSCC descriptions filescc_desc_manevu.083104.txt SMOKE 8/31/2004 1,335,524Temporal Allocation ProfilesTechnical memo onprofile/cross-referencereview for area sourcesMANE-VU_AreaEI_review_draft_090304.doc MSWord9/3/2004 760,320Technical memo onprofile/cross-referencereview for point sourcesMANE-VU_PointEI_review_draft_090304.doc MSWord9/3/2004 262,144Temporal profile crossreference file for pointsourcesamptref.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805.txt SMOKE 3/28/2005 704,998 Based on "amptref.m3.manevu.012405.txt"prepared forVersion 1, but added VISTAS BaseD cross-referencestothe state-specific 2002 continuous emissions monitoring(CEM)-derived point source temporal profiles generatedby VISTAS for their BaseD modeling.Temporal profiles file forpoint sourcesamptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.vistascem.032805.txt SMOKE3/28/2005 178,427 Based on "amptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.030205.txt"prepared for Version 1, but added state-specific 2002CEM-derived point source temporal profiles generated byVISTAS for their BaseD modeling.Temporal profile crossreference file for areasourcesamptref.m3.manevu.012405.txt SMOKE 1/24/2005 687,196Temporal profiles file forarea sourcesamptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.030205.txt SMOKE 3/2/2005136,131Temporal crossreference file containingstate-specific onroadmobile source data forConnecticut, Delaware,Maryland,Massachusetts, NewJersey, New York,Pennsylvania, andVermontMANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006_addCT.txt SMOKE 2/22/2006 2,522,013 Data for Connecticut were added to thefile after the filewas prepared for the other states. Hence the reason“_addCT” is included at the end of the file name.Table VII-1 (continued)124Description File Name FormatDate ofFile usedforVersion 3Size(Bytes) NotesTemporal profiles filecontaining state-specificonroad mobile sourcedata for Connecticut,Delaware, Maryland,Massachusetts, NewJersey, New York,Pennsylvania, andVermontMANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006_addCT.txt SMOKE 2/22/2006 23,122 Data for Connecticut were added to the file after the filewas prepared for the other states. Hence the reason“_addCT” is included at the end of the file name.Spatial/GriddingSpreadsheet summarygenerated for areasource gridding reviewMANE-VU_agref_review.xls 8/31/2004 1,607,680Spatial profile crossreference fileamgref.m3.us+can+mex.manevu.082404.txt SMOKE 8/31/2004 89,860Gridding surrogatecross-reference fileamgref_us_051704_manevu_added SMOKE 5/17/2004 35,825 Based on the surrogate cross-reference file downloadedfrom the EPA/CHIEF site that corresponds to the griddingsurrogates file. However, several MANE-VU-specificadditions included in"amgref.m3.us+can+mex.manevu.082404.txt" for Version1 were added to the gridding-cross reference filedownloaded from EPA. These are cross-references forSCCs 2806010000, 2806015000, 2870000011,2870000015, 2870000021, and 2870000022.Modeling grid (12-km) amgpro.12km_041604.otc12.us.txt SMOKE 4/16/2004 150,689,358 Based on downloaded12-km EPA gridding surrogateswindowed for the OTC domainSpeciation ProfilesSpreadsheet summarygenerated for areasource speciation reviewMANE-VU_asref_review.xls Excel 8/31/2004 5,626,880Speciation profiles filefor CB-IVgspro.cmaq.cb4p25.txt SMOKE 142,255Speciation crossreference file for CB-IVgsref.cmaq.cb4p25.manevu.083104.txt SMOKE 8/31/2004786,998Table VII-1 (continued)125Description File Name FormatDate ofFile usedforVersion 3Size(Bytes) NotesSpeciation profile crossreference assignmentfilegsref.cmaq.cb4p25.txt SMOKE 2/1/2005 754,302 This file is based on the file"gsref.cmaq.cb4p25.manevu.083104.txt" prepared forversion 1 of the MANE-VU inventory. The only revisionwas to change the PM2_5 speciation profile # from itsdefault 99999 to 35501 for some mobile sourcecategories. This update had been done by eitherCENRAP or VISTAS in the speciation profiles theyprovided and the update had a more recent creationdatethan the MANE-VU files created for Version 1, so thisappeared to be a refinement.Speciation profiles forREMSAD7gspro.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt_tag SMOKE 5/1/2005 532,990Based on "gspro.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt" in the SMOKE,but added tagged species for REMSAD state-level sulfurtagging.Speciation crossreference for REMSAD7gsref.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt_tag SMOKE 5/1/2005 2,614,360 Based on "gsref.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt" in the SMOKE,but added tagged species for REMSAD state-levelsulfur tagging.Transport fractions forfugitive dustgcntl.xportfrac.txt SMOKE 2/1/2004 124,495 File obtained from input file EPA used to adjust for PMtransport for modeling of Clean Air Interstate Rule(CAIR).C-126Table VII-2. Point Source Temporal Cross-referenceAdditionsRecommended profilesState FIPS SCCMonthlyWeeklyDiurnalMethod of assignmentSCC Description (Complete description not alwaysavailable)VT 50005 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/BarkWaste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)VT 50019 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/BarkWaste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)VT 50021 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/BarkWaste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)VT 50017 10300908 262 7 24 Use SCC=103009XX profiles External CombustionBoilers;Commercial/Institutional;Wood/Bark Waste;Woodfired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)PA 42009 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;NaturalGas;UnknownPA 42029 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;NaturalGas;UnknownPA 42045 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;NaturalGas;UnknownPA 42061 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;NaturalGas;UnknownPA 42067 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;NaturalGas;UnknownPA 42015 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal CombustionEngines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;UnknownPA 42029 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal CombustionEngines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;UnknownPA 42037 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal CombustionEngines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;UnknownPA 42071 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal CombustionEngines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;UnknownPA 42011 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other NotClassified;Specify in CommentsPA 42123 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other NotClassified;Specify in CommentsPA 42123 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other NotClassified;Specify in CommentsPA 42129 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other NotClassified;Specify in CommentsMD 24031 30500261 262 7 24 Use SCC=30500260 profileIndustrial Processes;Mineral Products;AsphaltConcrete;Drum Mix Plant: Rotary Drum Dryer/Mixer,Waste/Drain/#6 Oil-FiredTable VII-2 (continued)127Recommended profilesState FIPS SCCMonthlyWeeklyDiurnalMethod of assignmentSCC Description (Complete description not alwaysavailable)NY 36055 31603001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - SubstratePreparation;Extrusion OperationsNY 36055 31603002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - SubstratePreparation;Film Support OperationsNY 36055 31604001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - ChemicalPreparation;Chemical ManufacturingNY 36055 31604002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - ChemicalPreparation;Emulsion Making OperationsNY 36055 31604003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - ChemicalPreparation;Chemical Mixing OperationsNY 36055 31605001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - SurfaceTreatments;Surface Coating OperationsNY 36055 31605002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - SurfaceTreatments;Grid IonizersNY 36055 31605003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - SurfaceTreatments;Corona Discharge TreatmentNY 36055 31606001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - FinishingOperations;General Film ManufacturingNY 36055 31606002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - FinishingOperations;Cutting/Slitting OperationsPA 42101 31606002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - FinishingOperations;Cutting/Slitting OperationsNY 36055 31612001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - Cleaning Operations;TankCleaning OperationsNY 36055 31612002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - CleaningOperations;General Cleaning OperationsNY 36055 31613002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - StorageOperations;General Storage OperationsTable VII-2 (continued)128Recommended profilesState FIPS SCCMonthlyWeeklyDiurnalMethod of assignmentSCC Description (Complete description not alwaysavailable)NY 36055 31614001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - Material TransferOperations;Filling Operations (non petroleum)NY 36055 31614002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - Material TransferOperations;Transfer of ChemicalsNY 36055 31615001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - SeparationProcesses;Recovery OperationsNY 36055 31615003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - SeparationProcesses;Distillation OperationsNY 36055 31616002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;GeneralProcess Tank OperationsNY 36055 31616003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - OtherOperations;Miscellaneous Manufacturing OperationsNY 36055 31616004 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;PaintSpraying OperationsNY 36055 31616006 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - OtherOperations;Chemical Weighing OperationsPA Numerouscounties39000698 262 7 24 Use SCC=39000699 profile Industrial Processes;In-process Fuel Use;NaturalGas;UnknownNJ Numerouscounties39999901 262 7 24 Use SCC=399999XX profiles Industrial Processes;Miscellaneous ManufacturingIndustries;Miscellaneous Industrial Processes;UnknownPA 42015 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profilePetroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface CoatingOperations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;UnknownPA 42017 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profilePetroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface CoatingOperations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;UnknownPA 42091 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profilePetroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface CoatingOperations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;UnknownPA 42095 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profilePetroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface CoatingOperations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;UnknownPA 42097 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profilePetroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface CoatingOperations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;UnknownPA 42013 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum LiquidsStorage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;UnknownPA 42041 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum LiquidsStorage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;UnknownTable VII-2 (continued)129Recommended profilesState FIPS SCCMonthlyWeeklyDiurnalMethod of assignmentSCC Description (Complete description not alwaysavailable)PA 42045 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum LiquidsStorage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;UnknownPA 42071 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum LiquidsStorage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown

## C-130

Table VII-3. Unknown SCCs in the MANE-VU Point Sour ce Inventory

State FIPS SCC Description

PA 42101 24950002 Need more info: Unknown SCC

PA 42061 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; General

PA 42091 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; General

PA 42133 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; GeneralC-131Table VII-4. Area Source Temporal Cross-ReferenceUpdatesSMOKE Default profile New MANE-VU profileSCC SCC descriptionMonthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly Weekly Diurnal30502713 Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Industrial Sandand Gravel;Screening: Size Classification262 7 24 262 5 1230502760 Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Industrial Sandand Gravel;Sand Handling, Transfer, and Storage262 7 24 262 5 122302000000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC20;All Processes;Total262 7 26 262 7 2502302050000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC20;Bakery Products;Total262 7 26 262 5 262305000000 Industrial Processes;Mineral Processes:SIC 32;AllProcesses;Total262 7 26 262 5 102309100010 Industrial Processes;Fabricated Metals:SIC 34;Coating,Engraving, and Allied Services;Electroplating262 7 26 262 5 102311010000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;GeneralBuilding Construction;Total262 7 26 262 5 122311020000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;HeavyConstruction;Total262 7 26 262 5 122311030000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;RoadConstruction;Total262 7 26 262 5 122325000000 Industrial Processes;Mining and Quarrying: SIC 14;AllProcesses;Total262 7 26 262 5 102399000000 Industrial Processes;Industrial Processes: NEC;IndustrialProcesses: NEC;Total262 7 26 262 5 102399010000 Industrial Processes; IndustrialRefrigeration; Refrigerant Losses; AllProcesses262 7 26 262 5 102401015000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Factory FinishedWood: SIC 2426 thru 242;Total: All Solvent Types173 7 26 173 5 262401020000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;WoodFurniture: SIC25;Total: All Solvent Types287 7 26 287 5 262401025000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Furniture: SIC25;Total: All Solvent Types287 7 26 287 5 262401030000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Paper: SIC 26;Total:All Solvent Types257 7 26 257 5 262401040000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Cans: SIC341;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 262401045000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Coils: SIC3498;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 262401050000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;MiscellaneousFinished Metals: SIC 34 - (341 + 3498);Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 26Table VII-4 (continued)132SMOKE Default profile New MANE-VU profileSCC SCC descriptionMonthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly Weekly Diurnal2401055000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Machinery andEquipment: SIC 35;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 262401060000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Large Appliances:SIC 363;Total: All Solvent Types262 7 26 262 5 262401065000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Electronic and OtherElectrical: SIC 36 - 363;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 262401070000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Motor Vehicles: SIC371;Total: All Solvent Types140 7 26 140 5 262401075000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Aircraft: SIC372;Total: All Solvent Types169 7 26 169 5 262401080000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Marine: SIC373;Total: All Solvent Types266 7 26 266 5 262401085000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Railroad: SIC374;Total: All Solvent Types169 7 26 169 5 262401090000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;MiscellaneousManufacturing;Total: All Solvent Types260 7 26 260 5 262401090999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;MiscellaneousManufacturing;Solvents: NEC260 7 26 260 5 262401200000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Other SpecialPurpose Coatings;Total: All Solvent Types260 7 26 260 5 262401990000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;AllSurface CoatingCategories;Total: All Solvent Types260 7 26 260 5 262401990999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;AllSurface CoatingCategories;Solvents: NEC260 7 26 260 5 262415000000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Processes/AllIndustries;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 262415020000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products(SIC 34): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415025000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery andEquipment (SIC 35): All Processes;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415030000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.(SIC 36): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415035000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment(SIC 37): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415045000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;MiscellaneousManufacturing (SIC 39): All Processes;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415055000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Automotive Dealers (SIC55): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415060000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous RepairServices (SIC 76): All Processes;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 12Table VII-4 (continued)133SMOKE Default profile New MANE-VU profileSCC SCC descriptionMonthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly Weekly Diurnal2415065000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC75): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 6 122415100000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Open TopDegreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415105000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Furnitureand Fixtures(SIC 25): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415110000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Primary Metal Industries(SIC 33): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415120000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products(SIC 34): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415125000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery andEquipment (SIC 35): Open Top Degreasing;Total: AllSolvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415130000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.(SIC 36): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415135000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment(SIC 37): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415140000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Instruments and RelatedProducts (SIC 38): Open Top Degreasing;Total: AllSolvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415145000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;MiscellaneousManufacturing (SIC 39): Open Top Degreasing;Total:AllSolvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415200000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries:Conveyerized Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415230000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.(SIC 36): Conveyerized Degreasing;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415300000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: ColdCleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415305000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Furnitureand Fixtures(SIC 25): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415310000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Primary Metal Industries(SIC 33): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415320000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products(SIC 34): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415325000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery andEquipment (SIC 35): Cold Cleaning;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415330000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.(SIC 36): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 12Table VII-4 (continued)134SMOKE Default profile New MANE-VU profileSCC SCC descriptionMonthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly Weekly Diurnal2415335000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment(SIC 37): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415340000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Instruments and RelatedProducts (SIC 38): Cold Cleaning;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415345000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;MiscellaneousManufacturing (SIC 39): Cold Cleaning;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415355000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Automotive Dealers (SIC55): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415360000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC75): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 6 122415365000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous RepairServices (SIC 76): Cold Cleaning;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122425000000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;All Processes;Total: AllSolvent Types257 7 26 257 5 262425010000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Lithography;Total: AllSolvent Types257 7 26 257 5 262425020000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Letterpress;Total: AllSolvent Types257 7 26 257 5 262425030000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Rotogravure;Total: AllSolvent Types262 7 26 262 5 262425040000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Flexography;Total: AllSolvent Types257 7 26 257 5 262430000000 Solvent Utilization;Rubber/Plastics;AllProcesses;Total:All Solvent Types200 7 26 200 5 262601010000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;On-siteIncineration;Industrial;Total262 7 26 262 5 122601020000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;On-siteIncineration;Commercial/Institutional;Total262 7 26 262 5 122610010000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;OpenBurning;Industrial;Total262 7 26 262 5 122610020000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;OpenBurning;Commercial/Institutional;Total262 7 26 262 5 122805020000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Total489 7 26 1500 7 262805025000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Hogs and Pigs Waste Emissions;Total489 7 26 1500 7 262805030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Total489 7 26 1500 7 26Table VII-4 (continued)135SMOKE Default profile New MANE-VU profileSCC SCC descriptionMonthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly Weekly Diurnal2805035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Horses and Ponies Waste Emissions;Total262 7 26 1500 7 262805040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Sheep and Lambs Waste Emissions;Total489 7 26 1500 7 262805045001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Total489 7 26 262 7 242810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;OtherCombustion;Prescribed Burning for ForestManagement;Total14 7 24 3 11 13

## C-136 Table VII-5. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference Additions

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal

2104008002 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Fireplaces: Insert;

non-EPA certified 485 7 26

2104008003 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Fireplaces: Insert; EPA certified; non-catalytic 485 7 26

2104008004 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Fireplaces: Insert; EPA certified; catalytic 485 7 26

2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroiling 262 7 26

2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling 262 7 26

2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 262 7 26

2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 262 7 26

2302003200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Frying 262 7 26

2302080002 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Miscellaneous Food and Kindred Products;Refrigeration 262 7 26

2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural

Coatings - Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26

2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural

Coatings - Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26

2401102000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial

Maintenance Coatings-Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26

2401103000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial

Maintenance Coatings-Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26

2415270000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Manufacturing

(except SIC 36): Vapor and In-Line Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12

2415280000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other

Elec. (SIC 36): Vapor and In-Line Cleaning;Total: A ll Solvent Types 253 5 12

2415370000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation

Equipment Repair Services: Cold Cleaning;Total: A ll Solvent Types 253 5 12

2415380000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Manufacturing:

Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12

2610000400 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open

Burning;All Categories;Yard Waste - Brush Species Unspecified 262 7 26

2610000500 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open

Burning;All Categories;Land Clearing Debris (use 28

- 10-005-000 for Logging Debris Burning) 262 7 26

2610040400 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open

Burning;Municipal (collected from residences, parks,other for central burn);Yard Waste - Total 262 7 26

2630020010 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Wastewater Treatment Processes Total 262 7 24

## Table VII-5 (continued)

137 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal

2630020020 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Biosolids Processes Total 262 7 24

2630020030 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24

2630050000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24

2680001000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;Composting;100% Biosolids (e.g., sewage sludge, manure, mixtures of these matls);All

Processes 262 7 26

2680002000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;Composting;Mixed Waste (e.g., a 50:50 mixture of biosolids and green wastes);All Processe s 262 7 26

2801700011 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Calcium Ammonium

Nitrate 998 7 26

2801700012 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Potassium Nitrate 998 7 26

2801700013 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Diammonium Phosphate 998 7 26

2801700014 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Monoammonium Phosphate 998 7 26

2801700015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Liquid Ammonium Polyphosphate 998 7 26

2801700099 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Miscellaneous Fertiliz ers 998 7 26

2805001100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Confinement 1500 7 26

2805001200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26

2805001300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805002000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle Composite; Not Elsewhere
Classified 1500 7 26

2805003100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on pasture/range;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805007100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manu re management systems;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805007200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manu re management systems;Management 1500 7 26

2805007300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manu re management systems;Land application of manure 262 7 24

2805007330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manu re management systems; Land application 1500 7 26

2805007340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manu re management systems; Land application 1500 7 26

## Table VII-5 (continued)

138 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal

2805008100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manu re management systems;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805008200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manu re management systems;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26

2805008300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manu re management systems;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805009100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805009300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805010100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Confinement 262 7 24

2805010200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Manure handling and storage 262 7 24

2805010300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805018000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle composite; Not Elsewhere
Classified 1501 7 26

2805019100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805019200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Manure handlin g and storage 1500 7 26

2805019300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Land applicati on of

manure 1500 7 26

2805020001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Milk
Cows 1500 7 26

2805020002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Beef
Cows 1500 7 26

2805020003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Heifers
and Heifer Calves 1500 7 26

2805021300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;Land applicat ion
of manure 1500 7 26

2805022100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805022200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26

2805022300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805023300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805030001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Pullet Chicks and

Pullets less than 13 weeks old 1500 7 26

## Table VII-5 (continued)

139 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal

2805030002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Pullets 13 weeks

old and older but less than 20 weeks 1500 7 26

2805030003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Layers 1500 7 26

2805030004 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Broilers 1500 7 26

2805030008 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Geese 1500 7 26

2805039100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805039200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26

2805039300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805045000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Not Elsewhere
Classified 1500 7 26

2805045002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Angora Goats 1500 7 26

2805045003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Milk Goats 1500 7 26

2805047100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operations;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805047300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operations;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805053100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations;
Confinement 1500 7 26

2805054000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;"Mules; Donkeys; and Burros Waste Emissions";Not Elsewhere Classified 262 7 24

2806010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals

Waste Emissions;Cats;Total 262 7 24

2806015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals

Waste Emissions;Dogs;Total 262 7 24

2807020001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste

Emissions;Bears;Black Bears 262 7 26

2807020002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste

Emissions;Bears;Grizzly Bears 262 7 26

2807025000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste

Emissions;Elk;Total 262 7 26

2807030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste

Emissions;Deer;Total 262 7 26

2807040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste

Emissions;Birds;Total 262 7 26

2810060100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other

Combustion;Cremation;Humans 262 7 24

2870000001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Respiration

and Perspiration;Total 262 7 24

2870000002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Infant Diapered

Waste;Total 262 7 24

2870000011 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic

Activity;Household Products;Total 262 7 24

## Table VII-5 (continued)

140 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal

2870000015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Nonagricultural Fertilizers;Total 3 7 24

2870000021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic

Animals;Dogs;Total 262 7 24

2870000022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic

Animals;Cats;Total 262 7 24

2870000031 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals; Deer;Total 262 7 24

## C-141

Table VII-6. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference and Profile Additions for the MANE-VU Inventory

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2102002000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Industrial;Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal ;Total: All Boiler Types 1726 8 26 10000

2102006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Industrial;Natura l

Gas;Total: Boilers and IC Engines 1727 8 26 10000

2102007000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Industrial;Liquif ied

Petroleum Gas (LPG);Total: All Boiler Types 1727 8 26 10000

2103001000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Anthracite Coal ;Total: All Boiler Types 1720 8 26 10000

2103004000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Distillate Oil; Total: Boilers and IC Engines 1721 8 26 10000

2103006000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Tot al: Boilers and IC Engines 1722 8 26 10000

2103007000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Liquified Petro leum Gas (LPG);Total: All Combustor Types 1723 8 26 10000

2104002000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal;Total: All Combustor Types 1732 7 26 10000

2104004000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Disti llate

Oil;Total: All Combustor Types 1733 7 26 10000

2104006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Natur al

Gas;Total: All Combustor Types 1734 7 26 10000

2104007000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Liqui fied

Petroleum Gas (LPG);Total: All Combustor Types 1735 7 26 10000

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood; Total:

Woodstoves and Fireplaces 1740 2007 2014 10001

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood; Total:

Woodstoves and Fireplaces 1741 2008 2015 10003

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood; Total:

Woodstoves and Fireplaces 1742 2009 2016 10005

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood; Total:

Woodstoves and Fireplaces 1742 2009 2016 10005

2104008070 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Outdoor Wood Burning Equipment; 1743 2010 2017 10001

2104008070 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Outdoor Wood Burning Equipment; 1744 2011 2017 10003

2104008070 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Outdoor Wood Burning Equipment; 1745 2012 2017 10005

2104011000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;Kerosene;Total: All Heater T ypes 1736 7 26 10000

2294000000 Mobile Sources;Paved Roads;All Paved Roads;Total:

Fugitives 1729 7 26 10000

2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroilin g 262 7 26 10000

2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroilin g 262 7 26 10000

2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling 262 7 26 10000

## Table VII-6 (continued)

142 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling 262 7 26 10000

2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 262 7 26 10000

2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 262 7 26 10000

2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 262 7 26 10000

2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 262 7 26 10000

2302003200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Fry ing 262 7 26 10000

2302003200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Fry ing 262 7 26 10000

2311030000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;Road

Construction;Total 262 7 9 10000

2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural C oatings -

Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26 -9

2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural C oatings -

Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 20 27 10000

2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural C oatings -

Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26 -9

2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural C oatings -

Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 20 27 10000

2401005000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishin g: SIC

7532;Total: All Solvent Types 1702 5 27 10000

2401005500 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishin g: SIC

7532;Surface Preparation Solvents 1702 5 27 10000

2401005600 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishin g: SIC

7532;Primers 1702 5 27 10000

2401005700 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishin g: SIC

7532;Top Coats 1702 5 27 10000

2401005800 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishin g: SIC

7532;Clean-up Solvents 1702 5 27 10000

2401005800 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishin g: SIC

7532;Clean-up Solvents 1702 5 27 10001

2401008000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Traffic Marking s;Total: All

Solvent Types 1700 7 26 -9

2401008000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Traffic Marking s;Total: All

Solvent Types 1700 5 26 10000

2401008999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Traffic Marking s;Solvents:

NEC 1700 7 26 -9

2401102000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial Main tenance

Coatings-Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26 10000

2401103000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial Main tenance

Coatings-Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26 10000

2415100000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Open Top

Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 262 6 5 10000

2415130000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.

(SIC 36): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Ty pes 262 6 5 10000

2415300000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Cold

Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 262 6 5 10000

2415360000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC

75): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 262 5 5 10000

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1712 7 26 10001

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1714 7 26 10001

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1713 7 26 10003

## Table VII-6 (continued)

143 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1712 7 26 10003

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1714 7 26 10005

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1713 7 26 10005

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Ty pes 1709 7 26 10001

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Ty pes 1711 7 26 10001

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Ty pes 1710 7 26 10003

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Ty pes 1709 7 26 10003

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Ty pes 1711 7 26 10005

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Ty pes 1710 7 26 10005

2461850001 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Herb icides,
Corn 536 7 26 10000

2461850005 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Herb icides, Soy Beans 536 7 26 10000

2461850006 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Herb icides, Hay & Grains 536 7 26 10000

2461850051 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Othe r Pesticides, Corn 536 7 26 10000

2461850055 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Othe r Pesticides, Soy Beans 536 7 26 10000

2461850056 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Othe r Pesticides, Hay & Grains 536 7 26 10000

2501011010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Vapor Los ses 1701 7 26 10000

2501011010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Vapor Los ses 1701 7 26 10000

2501011011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Permeatio n 1701 7 26 10000

2501011011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Permeatio n 1701 7 26 10000

2501011012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000

2501011012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000

2501011015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501011015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501011016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Transport 1701 7 26 10000

2501011016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Transport 1701 7 26 10000

2501012010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Vapor Loss es 1701 7 26 10000

2501012010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Vapor Loss es 1701 7 26 10000

## Table VII-6 (continued)

144 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2501012011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Permeation 1701 7 26 10000

2501012011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Permeation 1701 7 26 10000

2501012012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000

2501012012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000

2501012015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501012015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501012016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Transport 1701 7 26 10000

2501012016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Transport 1701 7 26 10000

2501060000 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Total: All Gasoli ne/All

Processes 1701 7 26 -9

2501060050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 -9

2501060051 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Submerge d Filling 1701 7 26 -9

2501060052 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Splash F illing 1701 7 26 -9

2501060053 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Balanced Submerged Filling 1701 7 26 -9

2501060100 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 -9

2501060100 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Total 1724 7 26 10000

2501060101 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Displace ment
Loss/Uncontrolled 1701 7 26 -9

2501060102 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Displace ment
Loss/Controlled 1701 7 26 -9

2501060103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Spillage 1701 7 26 -9

2501060201 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Underground Tank: Breathing and Emptying 1701 7 26 -9

2501060204 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Off-High way Equipment Displacement Loss/Controlled 1701 7 26 10000

2501060205 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Off-High way Equipment Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501080050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Airports : Aviation Gasoline;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 10000

2501080102 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Airports: Aviation Gasoline;Stage 2: Displa cement
Loss 1701 7 26 10000

2501080103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Airports: Aviation Gasoline;Stage 2: Spilla ge 1701 7 26 10000

2501080201 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Airports: Aviation Gasoline;Underground Tan k: Breathing and Emptying 1701 7 26 10000

## Table VII-6 (continued)

145 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2501090050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP-8;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 10000

2501090060 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP-8;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 10000

2501090070 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Airports: Jet Naphtha or JP-4;Stage 1: Tota l 1701 7 26 10000

2501090080 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Airports: Jet Naphtha or JP-4;Stage 2: Tota l 1701 7 26 10000

2501090101 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP-8;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 10000

2501090102 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Marinas: Gasoline;Stage 2: Displacement Los s 1701 7 26 10000

2501090103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Marinas: Gasoline;Stage 2: Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501090201 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Storage;Marinas: Gasoline;Underground Tank: Emptyin g and Breathing 1701 7 26 10000

2505000000 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Produ ct

Transport;All Transport Types;Total: All Products 1701 7 26 -9

2610010000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open

Burning;Industrial;Total 262 9 2013 10000

2630020000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater

Treatment;Public Owned;Total Processed 262 7 24 10000

2630020010 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater

Treatment;Public Owned;Wastewater Treatment Process es Total 262 7 24 10000

2630020020 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater

Treatment;Public Owned;Biosolids Processes Total 262 7 24 10000

2630020030 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater

Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24 10000

2630050000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater

Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24 10000

2680001000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;Composting;100% Biosolids (e.g., sewage sl udge, manure, mixtures of these matls);All Processes 262 7 26 10000

2730100000 Natural Sources;Geogenic;Wind Erosion;To tal 1704 7 26 10000

2801001001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Corn;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801001005 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Wheat;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801001009 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Barley;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801001013 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Soybeans;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801001017 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Hay/Alfalfa;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801001021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Vegetables;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801002001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Corn;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

2801002002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Wheat;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

2801002003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Barley;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

2801002004 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Soybeans;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

2801002005 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Hay/Alfalfa;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

2801002006 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Vegetables;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

## Table VII-6 (continued)

146 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2801700020 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Corn 1705 7 26 10000

2801700021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Sorghum 1705 7 26 10000

2801700022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Wheat 1705 7 26 10000

2801700023 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Barley 1705 7 26 10000

2801700024 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Soybeans 1705 7 26 10000

2801700025 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Hay/Alfalfa 1705 7 26 10000

2801700026 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Vegetables 1705 7 26 10000

2805001100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on fe edlots (drylots);Confinement 1706 7 24 10000

2805001200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on fe edlots (drylots);Manure handling 1706 7 24 10000

2805001300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on fe edlots (drylots);Land application of 1706 7 24 10000

2805001310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on fee dlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000

2805001320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on fee dlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000

2805001330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on fee dlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000

2805001340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on fee dlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000

2805002000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle Composite; Total 1706 7 24 10000

2805007100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manu re management systems;Confinement 262 7 24 10000

2805007200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manu re management systems;Man 262 7 24 10000

2805007300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manu re management systems;Land applicati 262 7 24 10000

2805007340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manu re management systems;Lan 262 7 24 10000

2805008100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manu re management systems;Confinement 262 7 24 10000

2805008200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manu re management systems;Manure handlin 262 7 24 10000

2805008310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with wet manu re management systems;Lan 1708 7 24 10000

2805008320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with wet manu re management systems;Lan 1708 7 24 10000

## Table VII-6 (continued)

147 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2805009100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Confinement 262 7 24 10000

2805009200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Manure hand ling and storage 262 7 24 10000

2805009330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - broilers;Land Applic ation of

solid manure wit 1708 7 24 10000

2805009340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - broilers;Land Applic ation of

solid manure wit 1708 7 24 10000

2805010100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Confinement 262 7 24 10000

2805010200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Manure handl ing and storage 262 7 24 10000

2805010330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - turkeys;Land Applica tion of

solid manure with 1708 7 24 10000

2805010340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - turkeys;Land Applica tion of

solid manure with 1708 7 24 10000

2805019100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Confinement 1706 7 24 10000

2805019200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Manure handlin g and storage 1706 7 24 10000

2805019300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Land applicati on of

manure 1706 7 24 10000

2805019310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Applicati on of liquid

manure with 1706 7 24 10000

2805019320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Applicati on of liquid

manure witho 1706 7 24 10000

2805019330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Applicati on of solid

manure with i 1706 7 24 10000

2805019340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Applicati on of solid

manure withou 1706 7 24 10000

2805021100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;Confinement 1706 7 24 10000

2805021200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;Manure handli ng and storage 1706 7 24 10000

2805021310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Applicat ion of liquid manure with 1706 7 24 10000

2805021320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Applicat ion of liquid manure with 1706 7 24 10000

2805021330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Applicat ion of solid

manure with 1706 7 24 10000

2805021340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Applicat ion of solid

manure witho 1706 7 24 10000

2805023100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Confi nement 1706 7 24 10000

## Table VII-6 (continued)

148 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2805023200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Manur e handling and storage 1706 7 24 10000

2805023310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application of liquid man 1706 7 24 10000

2805023320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application of liquid man 1706 7 24 10000

2805023330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application
of solid manu 1706 7 24 10000

2805023340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application
of solid manu 1706 7 24 10000

2805035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Horses and Ponies Waste Emissions;Total 262 7 24 10000

2805038100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoon s (unspecified animal age);Confineme 1707 7 24 10000

2805038200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoon s (unspecified animal age);Manure ha 1707 7 24 10000

2805038300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoon s (unspecified animal age);Land appl 1707 7 24 10000

2805039100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Confinement 1707 7 24 10000

2805039200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoon s;Manure handling and storage 1707 7 24 10000

2805039310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000

2805039320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000

2805039330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000

2805039340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000

2805040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Sheep and Lambs Waste Emissions;Total 262 7 24 10000

2805045001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Total 262 7 24 10000

2805046100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operati ons (unspecified animal age);Confine 1707 7 24 10000

2805046300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operati ons (unspecified animal age);Land ap 1707 7 24 10000

2805047100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operations;Confinement 1707 7 24 10000

2805047200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operati ons (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000

## Table VII-6 (continued)

149 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2805047310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operati ons (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000

2805047320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operati ons (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000

2805047330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operati ons (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000

2805047340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operati ons (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000

2805052100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations (un specified animal age);Confinement 1707 7 24 10000

2805053100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations;
Confinement 1707 7 24 10000

2805053200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (un specified animal age);Man 1707 7 24 10000

2805053310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (un specified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000

2805053320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (un specified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000

2805053330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (un specified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000

2805053340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (un specified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000

2805054000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;"Mules; Donkeys; and Burros Waste Emissions";Not Elsewhere Classif 262 7 24 10000

2806010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals Waste

Emissions;Cats;Total 262 7 24 10000

2806015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals Waste

Emissions;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 10000

2807030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste

Emissions;Deer;Total 262 7 24 10000

2807040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste

Emissions;Birds;Total 262 7 24 10000

2810010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Human

Perspiration and Respiration;Total 1739 2006 24 10000

2810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Prescri bed

Burning for Forest Management;Total 1731 7 24 10000

2810030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Structu re

Fires;Total 1715 7 24 10000

2810035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Firefig hting

Training;Total 1716 2004 24 10000

2870000001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Respiration and

Perspiration;Total 262 7 24 10000

2870000002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Infant Diapered

Waste;Total 262 7 24 10000

2870000011 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Househ old

Products;Total 262 7 24 10000

2870000015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Nonagricultural Fertilizers;Total 3 7 24 10000

## Table VII-6 (continued)

150 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 2870000021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Anim als;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Anim als;Cats;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000031 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals; Deer;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000032 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals; Birds;Total 1728 7 24 10000

## C-151

Table VII-7. Point Source Speciation Profiles Adde d to Speciation Crossreference File for CB-IV with PM Mechanism

Recommended
Profiles
State FIPS SCC VOC PM 2.5 Method of Assignment SCC Description (Complete description not always available)

VT 50005 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)

VT 50019 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)

VT 50021 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)
VT 50017 10300908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=103009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Commercial/Institutional;Wood/Bark Waste;Wo od-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)
PA 42009 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas; Unknown

PA 42029 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas; Unknown

PA 42045 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas; Unknown

PA 42061 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas; Unknown

PA 42067 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas; Unknown

PA 42015 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutiona l;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42029 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutiona l;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42037 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutiona l;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42071 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutiona l;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42011 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Othe r Not Classified;Specify in Comments
PA 42123 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Othe r Not Classified;Specify in Comments

PA 42123 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Othe r Not Classified;Specify in Comments
PA 42129 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Othe r Not Classified;Specify in Comments

MD 24031 30500261 0025 22035 Use SCC=30500260 profile Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Asphalt Concr ete;Drum Mix Plant: Rotary Drum Dryer/Mixer, Waste/Drain/#6 Oil-Fired

PA Numerous

counties 39000698 0000 22004 Use SCC=39000699 profile Industrial Processes;In-process Fuel Use;Natural Gas;Unknown

NJ Numerous

counties 39999901 9003 22054 Use SCC=399999XX profiles Industrial Processes;Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries;Miscellaneous Industrial Processes;Unkno wn PA 42015 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown
PA 42017 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown

PA 42091 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown

PA 42095 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown
PA 42097 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown

PA 42013 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown
PA 42041 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown

PA 42045 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown

PA 42071 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and S olvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown

## C-152

Table VII-8. Point Source SCCs Lacking Speciation Profile Assignments for CB-IV

with PM Mechanism

State FIPS SCC Description

NY 36055 31603001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Substrate Preparation;Extrusion Operations

NY 36055 31603002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Substrate Preparation;Film Support Operations

NY 36055 31604001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Chemical Manufacturing

NY 36055 31604002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Emulsion Making Operations

NY 36055 31604003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Chemical Mixing Operations

NY 36055 31605001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Surface Treatments;Surface Coating Operations

NY 36055 31605002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Surface Treatments;Grid Ionizers

NY 36055 31605003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Surface Treatments;Corona Discharge Treatment

NY 36055 31606001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;General Film Manufacturing

NY 36055 31606002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;Cutting/Slitting Operations

PA 42101 31606002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;Cutting/Slitting Operations

NY 36055 31612001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Cleaning Operations;Tank Cleaning Operations

NY 36055 31612002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Cleaning Operations;General Cleaning Operations

NY 36055 31613002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Storage Operations;General Storage Operations

NY 36055 31614001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Material Transfer Operations;Filling Operations (non petrole um)

NY 36055 31614002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Material Transfer Operations;Transfer of Chemicals

NY 36055 31615001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Separation Processes;Recovery Operations

NY 36055 31615003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Separation Processes;Distillation Operations

NY 36055 31616002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Other Operations;General Process Tank Operations

NY 36055 31616003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Other Operations;Miscellaneous Manufacturing Operations

NY 36055 31616004 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Other Operations;Paint Spraying Operations

NY 36055 31616006 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Support Activities - Other Operations;Chemical Weighing Operations

## 153

Table VII-9. Summary of Version 3 Mass Emissions a nd SMOKE Input Files

S/L Agencies Included

in Files NIF 3.0 File Name

Containing Mass Emissions Inventory (Access 2000 Database

Files) Temporal Period of

Mass Emissions Inventory SMOKE Input File Name Temporal Period of

Emissions in
SMOKE/IDA File Point Source Inventory
CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA (state and Philadelphia, and Allegheny Counties), RI, VT MANEVU_2002_Pt_Versi on 3_040706.mdb Annual, Summer Day, and Winter Day MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_IN

PUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERD AY_042706.txt Annual and Summer Day

“ “ “ MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_IN PUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDA Y_042706.txt Annual and Winter Day

Area Source Inventory
CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_Area_04

0606.mdb Annual, Summer Day, Winter Day, and Average Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_I

NPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMER DAY_040606.txt Annual, Summer Day, and Average Day

“ “ “ MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_I NPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERD AY_040606.txt Annual, Winter Day, and Average Day

Nonroad Source Inventory
CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_NRD2002_NIF _030306.mdb Annual MANEVU_NRD2002_SMOK E_030306.ida Annual

Onroad Source Inventory

CT CT2002MANEVUORCAP

_122004.mdb Annual

DE DE2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual

DC DC2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual

ME ME2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual

MD MD2002MANEVUORCA

P_072004.mdb Annual

MA MA2002MANEVUORCAP

_022006_Access2000.md

b
MA2002MANEVUORCAP _022006_Access97.mdb Annual

NH NH2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual

NJ NJ2002MANEVUORCAP

_022006_Access2000.md

b
NJ2002MANEVUORCAP _022006_Access97.mdb Annual

NY NY2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual

PA PA2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual

RI DRI2002MANEVUORCA

P_072004.mdb Annual

VT VT2002MANEVUORCAP

_122004.mdb Annual

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_020

22006.txt

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_mcref_0202

2006.txt

## 154

S/L Agencies Included

in Files NIF 3.0 File Name

Containing Mass Emissions Inventory (Access 2000 Database

Files) Temporal Period of

Mass Emissions Inventory SMOKE Input File Name Temporal Period of

Emissions in
SMOKE/IDA File

DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, PA,

VT MANEVU_2002_mtpro_0202

2006.txt
DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, PA,

VT MANEVU_2002_mtref_0202

2006.txt
CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_mvref_0202

2006.txt

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02

022006.txt

MANEVU_2002_mcodes.txt CT, NY MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt
CT, NY MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt
CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT SMOKE MOBILE6 input
files—too numerous to list individually



## Table VII-10. Unique List of Start Date, End Date , and Emission Type Combinations for Daily Emissions in the MANE-VU 200 2 Point and Area Source Inventories, Version 3

Start

Date End Date Emission Type Emission

Type Period Season

Designation SMOKE File Point Source Inventory
20011201 20020228 27 NONANNUAL Winter MANEVU_Point_ SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt
20011201 20020228 29 NONANNUAL Winter MANEVU_Point_ SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt
20020101 20020331 27 NONANNUAL Winter MANEVU_Point_ SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt
20020101 20021231 29 NONANNUAL MD-Winter MANEVU_Poi nt_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt
VT-Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMME RDAY_042706.txt
20020501 20020930 29 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_ SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt
20020601 20020831 27 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_ SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt
20020601 20020831 29 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_ SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt
20020601 20020831 30 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_ SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt Area Source Inventory

20020101 20020831 27 Daily Average Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt

and MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt

20020101 20021231 29 Daily Average Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt

and MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt

20020401 20020930 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020401 20021031 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020512 20020512 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020601 20020831 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020601 20020831 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020601 20020929 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020629 20020629 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt

20011201 20020228 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20011201 20020228 29 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20021029 20021029 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20021104 20021104 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20021205 20021205 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_S MOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt

## 155

CHAPTER VIII. METHODS FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE MANE -VU REGION

Figure VIII-1 shows the geographic area for which t he 12-kilometer (km) CMAQ modeling domain was used to support air quality modeling for the MANE-VU region. The 36-km domain definition was used for geographical areas outside of the area shown in Figure VIII-1. Table VIII-1 identifies the geographic region as we ll as the types of emissions inventory and ancillary data used to in modeling for the MANE-VU region. The geographic areas for which data were obtained include the Visibility Improveme nt State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS), Central Regional Air Planning O rganization (CENRAP), and WRAP RPOs, the Midwest RPO, Canada, and Mexico.

Figure VIII-1. MANE-VU 12-Kilometer CMAQ Modeling D omain156Table VIII-1. Description of Non-MANE-VU Region Inventory Data Used for MANE-VU BaseB Modeling* Only utilized for 2002 BaseA 36-km modeling to generate boundary conditions for BaseA/BaseA1/BaseB current and future year 12-km modeling.GeographicalRegion/RPO Raw DataTime Periodand VersionNumberRaw DataFormat Source of Data Source of Ancillary DataDate Data and SummariesObtained by MANE-VU ModelersVISTAS Point, area,nonroad, andmobile2002 BaseGSMOKE IDA Gregory Stella, AlpineGeophysicsGregory Stella, AlpineGeophysicsJune/July 2006MRPO Point, area,nonroad, andmobile2002 BaseKSMOKE IDA NIF files provided by MarkJanssen, MRPO, andconverted to IDA format byGregory Stella, AlpineGeophysicsPart of VISTAS 2002 BaseDprovided by Gregory Stella,Alpine GeophysicsMay 2006CENRAP Point, area,nonroad, andmobile2002 BaseBSMOKE IDA CENRAP ftp siteLee Warden, Oklahoma DEQCENRAP ftp siteLee Warden, OklahomaDEQMarch 2006WRAP * Point, area,nonroad, andmobilePart ofVISTAS2002 BaseDSMOKE IDA Part of VISTAS 2002 BaseDprovided by Gregory Stella,Alpine GeophysicsPart of VISTAS 2002 BaseDprovided by Gregory Stella,Alpine GeophysicsJanuary 2005Area, nonroadand mobile2000 SMOKE IDA ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory/canada_2000inventorySMOKE 2.1 defaults February 2005CanadaPoint 2002 SMOKE IDAcreated byNYSDEC fromCanadian NPRIdatabasehttp://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/npri/npri_home_e.cfmSMOKE 2.1 defaults May 2005Mexico * Point, area,nonroad andmobile1999 SMOKE IDA EPA CAIR NODA SMOKE 2.1 defaults February 2005

## 157

CHAPTER IX. REFERENCES

CAMD, 2004: 2002 Continuous Emissions Monitoring D ata Files downloaded on July 8, 2004

from the EPA’s Clean Air Markets Division’s website (www.epa.gov/ airmarkets). [Note: The files can be found by clicking on Data and Maps on the left panel of the screen, then on Data Sets and Published Reports, and then on the fi rst item on the list, Emissions Data Prepackaged Datasets (http://cfpub.epa.gov/gdm/inde x.cfm?fuseaction= prepackaged.select). Year 2002 data for the quarte rly time period was selected and then “Display List” that provides 48 data sets (comma de limited text format) that were downloaded one by one and combined into a single da taset.]

EPA, 2002: Final Summary of the Development and Re sults of a Methodology for Calculating

Area Source Emissions from Residential Fuel Combust ion, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Factor and Inventory Group, Emissi ons Monitoring and Analysis Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standa rds. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. September 2002. (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volum e03/index.html).

EPA, 2003a: Enhanced Particulate Matter Controlled Emissions Calculator, User’s Manual, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Factor an d Inventory Group, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Office of Air Qua lity Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. September 2003.

EPA, 2003b: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine, Loco motive, and Other Nonroad Components of the National Emissions Invent ory, prepared by Eastern Research Group, Morrisville, NC, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 2003.

EPA, 2004a: Basic Format & Content Checker 3.0 (Fo rmerly known as the Quality Assurance / Quality Control Software 3.0) - March 2004; Extende d Quality Control Tool - Updated May 18, 2004. Available at the following EPA websi te: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/nif/index.html#nei.

EPA, 2004b: NEI Quality Assurance and Data Augment ation for Point Sources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emissions Monitori ng and Analysis Division, Emission Factor and Inventory Group, May 26, 2004.

EPA, 2004c: Factor Information and REtrieval (FIRE ) Data System, Version 6.24, located on the Technology Transfer Network Clearinghouse for I nventories & Emission Factors Web Site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/fire/ index.html. March 2004.

EPA, 2005a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final NONROAD2005 [computer software], Office of Transportation and Air Quality , Ann Arbor, MI. Available December 2005 at: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/nonroadmdl.htm.

## 158

EPA, 2005b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Mobile Inventory Model, NMIM2005 [computer software], Office of Transportat ion and Air Quality, Ann Arbor, MI. Available December 2005 at: http://www.epa.go v/otaq/nmim.htm.

ERG, 2004: Environmental Research Group, Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine, Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components of the Nat ional Emissions Inventory, technical memorandum prepared by Eastern Research G roup, Morrisville, NC, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 2004.

MANE-VU, 2003: Quality Assurance Plan for Developm ent of a 2002 Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the MANE-VU States, Final. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Vis ibility Union (MANE-VU). January
31, 2003.

MANE-VU, 2004a: Quality Assurance Project Plan (QA PP) for Area and Point Source Emissions Modeling Inventory Project, Final. Prepa red by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. and Carolina Environmental Program for the MidAtlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU). Aug ust 3, 2004.

MANE-VU, 2004b: Summary of Approaches Available f or Fugitive Dust Sources, Final. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU). July 15, 2004.

MANE-VU, 2004c: Summary of Approaches Available fo r Wildfires, Prescribed Burning, Slash Burning, and Agricultural Field Burn ing, Draft. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Nort heast Visibility Union (MANE-VU). July 24, 2004.

MANE-VU, 2005: Area and Point Source Emissions Mod eling Inventory Project, Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic /Northeast Visibility Union (MANEVU). January 31, 2005.

Thompson, 2002: Thompson, Rhonda L., “A Demonstrat ion of the Quality Assurance (QA) software specifically developed for the National Em ission Inventory (NEI),” presented at the International Emission Inventory Conference “Em ission Inventories - Partnering for the Future,” Atlanta, GA, April 15-18, 2002, (http: //www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/conference/ ei11/qa/thompson.pdf).

WRAP, 2005: Western Governors’ Association, Wester n Regional Air Partnership, “Analysis of the Fine Fraction of Particulate Matter in Fugitive Dust,” Final Report, October 12, 2005 (http://www.wrapair.org/forums/dejf/index.html).

## A-1 APPENDIX A

POINT SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLL UTANT

[ NOTE: The Appendix A table for each State is provi ded in a separate MS Word file because of the large size of each table. The Word files are p rovided in the zip file named “Appendix A.zip”; this zip file also includes an Excel Workbook file that contains the spreadsheet from which the Word file was created for each State.]

## B-1 APPENDIX B

AREA SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLL UTANT

[ NOTE: The Appendix B table for each State is provi ded in a separate MS Word file because of the large size of each table. The Word files are p rovided in the zip file named “Appendix B.zip”; this zip file also includes an Excel Workbook file that contains the spreadsheet from which the Word file was created for each State.]

## C-1 APPENDIX C

NONROAD SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: FINAL COUNTY, MONTHLY NATIONAL MOBILE INVENTORY MODEL (NMIM) INPUTS

CONTENTS

CONNECTICUT ........................................

................................................... ............................. C-2

DELAWARE ...........................................

................................................... ................................ C-2

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ...............................

................................................... .................... C-3

MAINE ..............................................

................................................... ...................................... C-3

MARYLAND ...........................................

................................................... ............................... C-4

MASSACHUSETTS......................................

................................................... .......................... C-6

NEW HAMPSHIRE ......................................

................................................... .......................... C-7

NEW JERSEY .........................................

................................................... ................................ C-7

NEW YORK ...........................................

................................................... ................................. C-9

PENNSYLVANIA.......................................

................................................... .......................... C-13

RHODE ISLAND .......................................

................................................... ........................... C-17

VERMONT............................................

................................................... ................................ C-18C-2Table C-1. MANE-VU County, Monthly NMIM/NONROAD InputsFIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC09CONNECTICUTRVP, psi001 Fairfield County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5003 Hartford County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.96.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3005 Litchfield County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3007 Middlesex County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3009 New Haven County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3011 New London County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3013 Tolland County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.96.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3015 Windham County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.96.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3Oxygen Weight Percent001 Fairfield County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172003 Hartford County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667005 Litchfield County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667007 Middlesex County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667009 New Haven County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667011 New London County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667013 Tolland County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667015 Windham County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Fairfield County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0003 Hartford County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0005 Litchfield County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0007 Middlesex County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0009 New Haven County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0011 New London County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0013 Tolland County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0015 Windham County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.010DELAWARERVP, psi001 Kent County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.86.8 10.6 10.6 13.4003 New Castle County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4005 Sussex County 13.4 13.4 10.4 10.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 10.4 10.4 13.4Oxygen Weight Percent001 Kent County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.08962.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442003 New Castle County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442005 Sussex County 1.4645 1.4645 1.5538 1.5538 1.6431 1.6431 1.6431 1.6431 1.6431 1.5538 1.5538 1.4645Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Kent County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0003 New Castle County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0005 Sussex County 225.0 225.0 186.0 186.0 134.0 134.0 134.0 134.0 134.0 186.0 186.0 225.0Table C-1 (continued)C-3FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC11DISTRICT OF COLUMBIARVP, psi001 District of Columbia 13.1 13.1 10.4 10.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.4 13.1Oxygen Weight Percent001 District of Columbia 1.7681 1.7681 1.8217 1.8217 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.82171.7681Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 District of Columbia 230.0 230.0 199.6 199.6 159.0 159.0 159.0 159.0 159.0 159.0 199.6 230.023MAINERVP, psi001 Androscoggin County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.57.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6003 Aroostook County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.48.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6005 Cumberland County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6007 Franklin County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.48.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6009 Hancock County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6011 Kennebec County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.77.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6013 Knox County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.39.7 10.7 10.3 11.6015 Lincoln County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6017 Oxford County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6019 Penobscot County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.48.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6021 Piscataquis County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6023 Sagadahoc County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.77.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6025 Somerset County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.48.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6027 Waldo County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.49.7 10.7 10.3 11.6029 Washington County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6031 York County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.39.7 10.7 10.3 11.6Oxygen Weight Percent001 Androscoggin County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.32350.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080003 Aroostook County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080005 Cumberland County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080007 Franklin County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080009 Hancock County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080011 Kennebec County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080013 Knox County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.24200.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080015 Lincoln County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080017 Oxford County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080019 Penobscot County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080021 Piscataquis County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.32350.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080023 Sagadahoc County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080025 Somerset County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080027 Waldo County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.37860.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080029 Washington County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080031 York County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.24200.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Androscoggin County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0003 Aroostook County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0005 Cumberland County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0007 Franklin County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0Table C-1 (continued)C-4FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC009 Hancock County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.023 MAINE (cont’d)011 Kennebec County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0013 Knox County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0015 Lincoln County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0017 Oxford County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0019 Penobscot County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0021 Piscataquis County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0023 Sagadahoc County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0025 Somerset County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0027 Waldo County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0029 Washington County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0031 York County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.024MARYLANDRVP, psi003 Anne Arundel County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6005 Baltimore County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.66.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6009 Calvert County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6011 Caroline County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6013 Carroll County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6015 Cecil County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.69.3 9.3 9.3 12.6017 Charles County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6019 Dorchester County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.28.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6021 Frederick County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.66.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6023 Garrett County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6025 Harford County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6027 Howard County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.69.3 9.3 9.3 12.6029 Kent County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6031 Montgomery County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.66.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6033 Prince George's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6035 Queen Anne's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6037 St. Mary's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.28.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6039 Somerset County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6041 Talbot County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.29.3 9.3 9.3 12.6043 Washington County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.28.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6045 Wicomico County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6047 Worcester County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.28.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6510 Baltimore city 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6Oxygen Weight Percent001 Allegany County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075003 Anne Arundel County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.10752.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075005 Baltimore County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075009 Calvert County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075011 Caroline County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075013 Carroll County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075015 Cecil County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.10752.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075017 Charles County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075019 Dorchester County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075021 Frederick County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075Table C-1 (continued)C-5FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC023 Garrett County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.107524 MARYLAND (cont’d)025 Harford County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075027 Howard County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075029 Kent County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.10752.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075031 Montgomery County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075033 Prince George's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075035 Queen Anne's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.10752.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075037 St. Mary's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075039 Somerset County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075041 Talbot County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075043 Washington County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075045 Wicomico County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075047 Worcester County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075510 Baltimore city 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Allegany County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9003 Anne Arundel County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0005 Baltimore County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0009 Calvert County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0011 Caroline County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9013 Carroll County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0015 Cecil County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 130.0 155.1 174.0017 Charles County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0019 Dorchester County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9021 Frederick County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0023 Garrett County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9025 Harford County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0027 Howard County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0029 Kent County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 130.0 155.1 174.0031 Montgomery County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0033 Prince George's County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0035 Queen Anne's County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 130.0 155.1 174.0037 St. Mary's County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9039 Somerset County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9041 Talbot County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9043 Washington County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9045 Wicomico County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9047 Worcester County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9510 Baltimore city 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0Table C-1 (continued)C-6FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC25MASSACHUSETTSRVP, psi001 Barnstable County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5003 Berkshire County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5005 Bristol County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.76.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5007 Dukes County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5009 Essex County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5011 Franklin County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.76.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5013 Hampden County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.76.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5015 Hampshire County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5017 Middlesex County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5019 Nantucket County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5021 Norfolk County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.76.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5023 Plymouth County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.76.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5025 Suffolk County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.76.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5027 Worcester County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5Oxygen Weight Percent001 Barnstable County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002003 Berkshire County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002005 Bristol County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002007 Dukes County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.10752.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002009 Essex County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.10752.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002011 Franklin County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002013 Hampden County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002015 Hampshire County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002017 Middlesex County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002019 Nantucket County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002021 Norfolk County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002023 Plymouth County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002025 Suffolk County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002027 Worcester County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Barnstable County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0003 Berkshire County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0005 Bristol County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0007 Dukes County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0009 Essex County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0011 Franklin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0013 Hampden County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0015 Hampshire County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0017 Middlesex County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0019 Nantucket County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0021 Norfolk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0023 Plymouth County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0025 Suffolk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0027 Worcester County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0Table C-1 (continued)C-7FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC33NEW HAMPSHIRERVP, psi001 Belknap County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.97.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6003 Carroll County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.97.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6005 Cheshire County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.97.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6007 Coos County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.97.9 11.2 11.2 13.6009 Grafton County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.97.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6011 Hillsborough County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.76.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9013 Merrimack County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9015 Rockingham County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9017 Strafford County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9019 Sullivan County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.97.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6Oxygen Weight Percent001 Belknap County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786003 Carroll County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786005 Cheshire County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786007 Coos County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.28580.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786009 Grafton County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786011 Hillsborough County 1.8217 1.8217 1.9110 1.91102.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 1.9110 1.9110 1.8217013 Merrimack County 1.8217 1.8217 1.9110 1.9110 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 1.9110 1.9110 1.8217015 Rockingham County 1.9825 1.9825 2.0539 2.0539 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.0539 2.0539 1.9825017 Strafford County 1.9825 1.9825 2.0539 2.0539 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.0539 2.0539 1.9825019 Sullivan County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Belknap County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1003 Carroll County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1005 Cheshire County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1007 Coos County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1009 Grafton County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1011 Hillsborough County 121.0 121.0 101.3 101.3 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 101.3 101.3 121.0013 Merrimack County 121.0 121.0 101.3 101.3 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 101.3 101.3 121.0015 Rockingham County 148.0 148.0 121.0 121.0 85.085.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 121.0 121.0 148.0017 Strafford County 148.0 148.0 121.0 121.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 121.0 121.0 148.0019 Sullivan County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.134NEW JERSEYRVP, psi001 Atlantic County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.86.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4003 Bergen County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5005 Burlington County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4007 Camden County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4009 Cape May County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.86.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4011 Cumberland County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4013 Essex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5015 Gloucester County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4017 Hudson County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5019 Hunterdon County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5021 Mercer County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4023 Middlesex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5Table C-1 (continued)C-8FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC34 NEW JERSEY025 Monmouth County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.86.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5(cont’d)027 Morris County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5029 Ocean County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5031 Passaic County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.86.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5033 Salem County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4035 Somerset County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.86.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5037 Sussex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5039 Union County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5041 Warren County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4Oxygen Weight Percent001 Atlantic County 1.6922 1.6922 1.8499 1.8499 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 1.8499 1.8499 1.6922003 Bergen County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172005 Burlington County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442007 Camden County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442009 Cape May County 1.6922 1.6922 1.8499 1.8499 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 1.8499 1.8499 1.6922011 Cumberland County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442013 Essex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.82341.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172015 Gloucester County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442017 Hudson County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172019 Hunterdon County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172021 Mercer County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442023 Middlesex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172025 Monmouth County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172027 Morris County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172029 Ocean County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.82341.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172031 Passaic County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172033 Salem County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.08962.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442035 Somerset County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172037 Sussex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172039 Union County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.82341.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172041 Warren County 1.8753 1.8753 1.9110 1.9110 1.9825 1.9825 1.9825 1.9825 1.9825 1.9110 1.9110 1.8753Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Atlantic County 207.0 207.0 174.0 174.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 174.0 174.0 207.0003 Bergen County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0005 Burlington County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0007 Camden County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0009 Cape May County 207.0 207.0 174.0 174.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 174.0 174.0 207.0011 Cumberland County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0013 Essex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0015 Gloucester County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0017 Hudson County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0019 Hunterdon County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0021 Mercer County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0023 Middlesex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0025 Monmouth County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0027 Morris County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0029 Ocean County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0031 Passaic County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0Table C-1 (continued)C-9FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC34 NEW JERSEY033 Salem County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0(cont’d)035 Somerset County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0037 Sussex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0039 Union County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0041 Warren County 125.0 125.0 123.7 123.7 122.0 122.0 122.0 122.0 122.0 123.7 123.7 125.036NEW YORKRVP, psi001 Albany County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4003 Allegany County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4005 Bronx County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.76.9 10.3 11.7 12.5007 Broome County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4009 Cattaraugus County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.38.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4011 Cayuga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4013 Chautauqua County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4015 Chemung County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4017 Chenango County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4019 Clinton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4021 Columbia County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4023 Cortland County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4025 Delaware County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4027 Dutchess County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4029 Erie County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.28.2 9.6 10.7 11.4031 Essex County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4033 Franklin County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4035 Fulton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4037 Genesee County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4039 Greene County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4041 Hamilton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4043 Herkimer County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4045 Jefferson County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4047 Kings County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.76.9 10.3 11.7 12.5049 Lewis County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4051 Livingston County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4053 Madison County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4055 Monroe County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4057 Montgomery County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4059 Nassau County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5061 New York County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.66.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5063 Niagara County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4065 Oneida County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4067 Onondaga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4069 Ontario County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4071 Orange County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5073 Orleans County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4075 Oswego County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4077 Otsego County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4079 Putnam County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5081 Queens County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5Table C-1 (continued)C-10FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC36 NEW YORK083 Rensselaer County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4(cont’d)085 Richmond County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.66.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5087 Rockland County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.66.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5089 St. Lawrence County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.38.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4091 Saratoga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4093 Schenectady County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.38.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4095 Schoharie County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4097 Schuyler County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4099 Seneca County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4101 Steuben County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4103 Suffolk County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5105 Sullivan County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4107 Tioga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4109 Tompkins County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4111 Ulster County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4113 Warren County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4115 Washington County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4117 Wayne County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4119 Westchester County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5121 Wyoming County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.38.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4123 Yates County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4Oxygen Weight Percent001 Albany County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930003 Allegany County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930005 Bronx County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.96461.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431007 Broome County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930009 Cattaraugus County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.65510.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965011 Cayuga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930013 Chautauqua County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965015 Chemung County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930017 Chenango County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930019 Clinton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930021 Columbia County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930023 Cortland County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930025 Delaware County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930027 Dutchess County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930029 Erie County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.89650.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965031 Essex County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.89300.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930033 Franklin County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930035 Fulton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930037 Genesee County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930039 Greene County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930041 Hamilton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930043 Herkimer County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930045 Jefferson County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930047 Kings County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.96461.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431049 Lewis County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.89300.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930051 Livingston County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930053 Madison County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930Table C-1 (continued)C-11FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC36 NEW YORK055 Monroe County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930(cont’d)057 Montgomery County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930059 Nassau County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431061 New York County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431063 Niagara County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965065 Oneida County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930067 Onondaga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930069 Ontario County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930071 Orange County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431073 Orleans County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930075 Oswego County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930077 Otsego County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930079 Putnam County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431081 Queens County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431083 Rensselaer County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930085 Richmond County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431087 Rockland County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431089 St. Lawrence County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.64300.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930091 Saratoga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930093 Schenectady County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.64300.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930095 Schoharie County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930097 Schuyler County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930099 Seneca County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930101 Steuben County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930103 Suffolk County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431105 Sullivan County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930107 Tioga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.89300.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930109 Tompkins County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930111 Ulster County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930113 Warren County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930115 Washington County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930117 Wayne County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.89300.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930119 Westchester County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.87531.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431121 Wyoming County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930123 Yates County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.89300.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Albany County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0003 Allegany County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0005 Bronx County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0007 Broome County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0009 Cattaraugus County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0011 Cayuga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0013 Chautauqua County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0015 Chemung County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0017 Chenango County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0019 Clinton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0021 Columbia County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0023 Cortland County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0025 Delaware County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0Table C-1 (continued)C-12FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC36 NEW YORK027 Dutchess County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0(cont’d)029 Erie County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0031 Essex County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0033 Franklin County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0035 Fulton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0037 Genesee County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0039 Greene County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0041 Hamilton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0043 Herkimer County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0045 Jefferson County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0047 Kings County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0049 Lewis County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0051 Livingston County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0053 Madison County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0055 Monroe County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0057 Montgomery County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0059 Nassau County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0061 New York County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0063 Niagara County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0065 Oneida County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0067 Onondaga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0069 Ontario County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0071 Orange County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0073 Orleans County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0075 Oswego County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0077 Otsego County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0079 Putnam County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0081 Queens County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0083 Rensselaer County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0085 Richmond County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0087 Rockland County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0089 St. Lawrence County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0091 Saratoga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0093 Schenectady County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0095 Schoharie County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0097 Schuyler County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0099 Seneca County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0101 Steuben County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0103 Suffolk County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0105 Sullivan County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0107 Tioga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0109 Tompkins County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0111 Ulster County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0113 Warren County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0115 Washington County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0117 Wayne County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0119 Westchester County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0121 Wyoming County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0123 Yates County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0Table C-1 (continued)C-13FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC42PENNSYLVANIARVP, psi001 Adams County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5003 Allegheny County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5005 Armstrong County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5007 Beaver County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5009 Bedford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5011 Berks County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5013 Blair County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5015 Bradford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5017 Bucks County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5019 Butler County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5021 Cambria County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5023 Cameron County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5025 Carbon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5027 Centre County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5029 Chester County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.76.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5031 Clarion County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5033 Clearfield County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5035 Clinton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5037 Columbia County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5039 Crawford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5041 Cumberland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5043 Dauphin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5045 Delaware County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.76.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5047 Elk County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 11.0 11.0 13.5049 Erie County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 11.0 11.0 13.5051 Fayette County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.87.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5053 Forest County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5055 Franklin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5057 Fulton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5059 Greene County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5061 Huntingdon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5063 Indiana County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5065 Jefferson County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5067 Juniata County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5069 Lackawanna County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5071 Lancaster County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5073 Lawrence County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5075 Lebanon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5077 Lehigh County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5079 Luzerne County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5081 Lycoming County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5083 McKean County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5085 Mercer County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5087 Mifflin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5089 Monroe County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5091 Montgomery County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5093 Montour County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5Table C-1 (continued)C-14FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC42 PENNSYLVANIA095 Northampton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5(cont’d)097 Northumberland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5099 Perry County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5101 Philadelphia County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.76.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5103 Pike County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 11.0 11.0 13.5105 Potter County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5107 Schuylkill County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5109 Snyder County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5111 Somerset County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5113 Sullivan County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5115 Susquehanna County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5117 Tioga County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5119 Union County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5121 Venango County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5123 Warren County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5125 Washington County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5127 Wayne County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5129 Westmoreland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.87.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5131 Wyoming County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5133 York County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 11.0 11.0 13.5Oxygen Weight Percent001 Adams County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965003 Allegheny County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965005 Armstrong County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965007 Beaver County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965009 Bedford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965011 Berks County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965013 Blair County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965015 Bradford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965017 Bucks County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.10752.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303019 Butler County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965021 Cambria County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965023 Cameron County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965025 Carbon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965027 Centre County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965029 Chester County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303031 Clarion County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965033 Clearfield County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965035 Clinton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965037 Columbia County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965039 Crawford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965041 Cumberland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965043 Dauphin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965045 Delaware County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303047 Elk County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965049 Erie County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965051 Fayette County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965053 Forest County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965055 Franklin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965Table C-1 (continued)C-15FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC42 PENNSYLVANIA057 Fulton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965(cont’d)059 Greene County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965061 Huntingdon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965063 Indiana County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965065 Jefferson County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965067 Juniata County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965069 Lackawanna County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965071 Lancaster County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965073 Lawrence County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965075 Lebanon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965077 Lehigh County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965079 Luzerne County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965081 Lycoming County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965083 McKean County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965085 Mercer County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965087 Mifflin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965089 Monroe County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965091 Montgomery County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303093 Montour County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965095 Northampton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.23220.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965097 Northumberland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.23220.1965099 Perry County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965101 Philadelphia County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.53032.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303103 Pike County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965105 Potter County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965107 Schuylkill County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965109 Snyder County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965111 Somerset County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965113 Sullivan County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965115 Susquehanna County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.23220.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965117 Tioga County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965119 Union County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965121 Venango County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965123 Warren County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965125 Washington County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965127 Wayne County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965129 Westmoreland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.23220.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965131 Wyoming County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965133 York County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Adams County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0003 Allegheny County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0005 Armstrong County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0007 Beaver County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0009 Bedford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0011 Berks County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0013 Blair County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0015 Bradford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0017 Bucks County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0Table C-1 (continued)C-16FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC42 PENNSYLVANIA019 Butler County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0(cont’d)021 Cambria County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0023 Cameron County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0025 Carbon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0027 Centre County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0029 Chester County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0031 Clarion County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0033 Clearfield County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0035 Clinton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0037 Columbia County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0039 Crawford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0041 Cumberland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0043 Dauphin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0045 Delaware County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0047 Elk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0049 Erie County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0051 Fayette County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0053 Forest County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0055 Franklin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0057 Fulton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0059 Greene County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0061 Huntingdon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0063 Indiana County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0065 Jefferson County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0067 Juniata County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0069 Lackawanna County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0071 Lancaster County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0073 Lawrence County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0075 Lebanon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0077 Lehigh County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0079 Luzerne County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0081 Lycoming County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0083 McKean County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0085 Mercer County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0087 Mifflin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0089 Monroe County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0091 Montgomery County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0093 Montour County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0095 Northampton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0097 Northumberland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0099 Perry County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0101 Philadelphia County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0103 Pike County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0105 Potter County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0107 Schuylkill County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0109 Snyder County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0111 Somerset County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0113 Sullivan County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0115 Susquehanna County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0Table C-1 (continued)C-17FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC42 PENNSYLVANIA117 Tioga County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0(cont’d)119 Union County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0121 Venango County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0123 Warren County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0125 Washington County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0127 Wayne County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0129 Westmoreland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0131 Wyoming County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0133 York County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.044RHODE ISLANDRVP, psi001 Bristol County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.96.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5003 Kent County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.96.9 10.1 10.1 12.5005 Newport County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.96.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5007 Providence County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5009 Washington County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5Oxygen Weight Percent001 Bristol County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110003 Kent County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.67451.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110005 Newport County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110007 Providence County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110009 Washington County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Bristol County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0003 Kent County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0005 Newport County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0007 Providence County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0009 Washington County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0Table C-1 (continued)C-18FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APRMAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC50VERMONTRVP, psi001 Addison County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.58.5 9.5 9.5 9.5003 Bennington County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5005 Caledonia County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5007 Chittenden County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5009 Essex County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5011 Franklin County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.58.5 9.5 9.5 9.5013 Grand Isle County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5015 Lamoille County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.58.5 9.5 9.5 9.5017 Orange County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5019 Orleans County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.58.5 9.5 9.5 9.5021 Rutland County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.58.5 9.5 9.5 9.5023 Washington County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5025 Windham County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.58.5 9.5 9.5 9.5027 Windsor County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.58.5 9.5 9.5 9.5Oxygen Weight Percent001 Addison County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786003 Bennington County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786005 Caledonia County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786007 Chittenden County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786009 Essex County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786011 Franklin County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786013 Grand Isle County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786015 Lamoille County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786017 Orange County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786019 Orleans County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786021 Rutland County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786023 Washington County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786025 Windham County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786027 Windsor County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Addison County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3003 Bennington County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3005 Caledonia County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3007 Chittenden County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3009 Essex County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3011 Franklin County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3013 Grand Isle County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3015 Lamoille County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3017 Orange County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3019 Orleans County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3021 Rutland County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3023 Washington County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3025 Windham County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3027 Windsor County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3