alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 239.13 Program performance reviews.

HQUSACE will prepare monthly program performance reviews using the HAPMIS; HQUSACE Annual Management Command Plan and Management Control Checklist. In addition, program monitoring will also be conducted (through HAPMIS and CEFMS reports) at the Headquarters Department of the Army and at the DUSD(I&E) levels.
#### § 243.12 Required records retention.

The air carrier is required to retain copies of data submitted to support rate determination for a period identified in Subpart 4.7 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Contractor Records Retention.
Crittenden County Traffic Trends 

(2000-2010) 

• The information presented here is a trend analysis for traffic data collected in Crittenden 

County, Arkansas from 2000 - 2010. 

• The Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department collects Average Daily Traffic 

(ADT) on an annual basis. 

• All of the traffic data is collected and reported in accordance with Federal Highway 

Administration guidelines in the Traffic Monitoring Guide (TMG) and the American 

Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Guidelines for Traffic Data 

Programs. 

• The Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department has 241 count stations in 

Crittenden County. 

• Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is calculated from the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) using the 

formula: Total VMT = SUM (Section Length x ADT). 

• Chart 1 displays the historic Daily Vehicles Miles Traveled (DVMT) for all public roads in 

Crittenden County and Chart 2 displays the DVMT for all public roads (all State and US 

Highways, City Streets and County Roads) in the State of Arkansas. 

• The calculated Average Annual Growth Factor (AAGF) Statewide from 2000 through 2010 is 

1.91%, while in Crittenden County the AAGF is only 0.14%. 

• The Statewide DVMT (Chart 2) has increased 5.1% since 2006, while the Crittenden County 

DVMT (Chart 1) has decreased 9.5% during the same period. 
AHTD: P&R: PAS: MCH 1/25/2012 

Chart 1 

2000-2010 AAGF=0.14% increase in VMT 

2006-2010 9.5% decrease in VMT 

Chart 2 

2000-2010 AAGF=1.91% increase in VMT 

2006-2010 5.1% increase in VMT 

2,100,000 

2,150,000 

2,200,000 

2,250,000 

2,300,000 

2,350,000 

2,400,000 

2,450,000 

2,500,000 

2,550,000 

2,600,000 

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

DVMT

Year

Crittenden County DVMT

76,000,000 

78,000,000 

80,000,000 

82,000,000 

84,000,000 

86,000,000 

88,000,000 

90,000,000 

92,000,000 

94,000,000 

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

DVMT

Year

Statewide DVMT
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Stephen J. Alesia                        |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen                J. Alesia                            |   |
| Vice                President & Chief Financial Officer |   |
| January                23, 2006                             |   |

----
# C_2009282EN.01006301.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/63

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2009 — Neophytou v Commission

(Case F-22/05 RENV) (1)

1

(Civil service - Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside - Open competition - Not included on the reserve list - Selection board - Appointment)

2009/C 282/118

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Neophytos Neophytou (Itzig, Luxembourg) (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the selection board for open competition EPSO/A/1/03 for the constitution of a reserve list of assistant administrators (A8) having Cypriot citizenship not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list of successful candidates — Case T-43/07 P referred back after appeal)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Neophytou to bear half of his own costs relating to the proceedings before the Tribunal and the Court of First Instance; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Neophytou to bear half of his own costs relating to the proceedings before the Tribunal and the Court of First Instance;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay, in addition to all its own costs relating to the proceedings before the Tribunal and the Court of First Instance, half of the costs incurred by Mr Neophytou relating to those proceeding. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay, in addition to all its own costs relating to the proceedings before the Tribunal and the Court of First Instance, half of the costs incurred by Mr Neophytou relating to those proceeding.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.6.2005, p. 29.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         46,681,653
<SECURITIES>                                   47,006,928
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,354,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (579,000)
<INVENTORY>                                       990,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              114,625,917
<PP&E>                                         28,012,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,006,068)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                156,412,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,003,285
<BONDS>                                         9,442,308
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          190,954
<OTHER-SE>                                    102,137,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  156,412,768
<SALES>                                         3,191,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,134,110
<CGS>                                           3,194,559
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,560,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,471,646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                220,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,744,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,744,964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,744,964)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.09)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                             HUDDLESTON & CO. INC.

                      PETROLEUM AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERS

                            1111 FANNIN-SUITE 1700
                             HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

                                ---------------

                                (713) 658-0248

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEER

As independent petroleum consultants, Huddleston & Co., Inc., hereby consents
(i) to the reference to our Firm as experts and the summarization of our reports
entitled "HarCor Energy, Inc., Estimated Future Reserves and Revenues for
Certain Properties as of January 1, 1997," as detailed in the Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1996, for HarCor Energy, Inc., filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission in March 1997 and (ii) to the incorporation by reference
of such Form 10-K in the Registration Statements of HarCor Energy, Inc., on Form
S-8 (No. 33-69312) and Form S-3 (No. 33-84496).


                                        HUDDLESTON & CO., INC.


                                        By:  /s/ Peter D. Huddleston
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Peter D. Huddleston, P.E.
                                           President

Houston, Texas
March 27, 1997
§ 516.66 Administrative and contractual actions. ( a ) The following remedial options should be considered in response to confirmed fraudulent activity: ( 1 ) Contractual. ( i ) Termination of contract for default.
( ii ) Nonaward of contract based upon a finding of contractor nonresponsibility. (If this appears to be a valid option, a DFARS 209.406-3 (48 CFR 209.406-3) report must be prepared where contractor nonresponsibility is based on lack of integrity).
( iii ) Rescission of contract.
( iv ) Revocation of acceptance.
( v ) Use of contract warranties.
( vi ) Withholding of payments to contractor. In the case of withholding pursuant to DFARS 2032.173, the Chief, PFD, is the Army Remedy Coordinating Official.
( vii ) Offset of payments due to contractor from other contracts.
( viii ) Revocation of facility security clearances.
( ix ) Increased level of quality assurance.
( x ) Refusal to accept nonconforming goods.
( xi ) Denial of claims submitted by contractors.
( xii ) Removal of contract from automated solicitation or payment system.
( 2 ) Administrative. ( i ) Change in contracting forms and procedures.
( ii ) Removal or reassignment of government personnel.
( iii ) Review of contract administration and payment controls.
( iv ) Revocation of warrant of contracting officer.
( v ) Suspension of contractor.
( vi ) Debarment of contractor.
( b ) In cases which are pending review or action by DOJ, PFAs should coordinate with the DOJ attorney handling the case prior to initiating any contractual or administrative remedy. In the case of ongoing criminal investigations, this coordination will be accomplished through the appropriate DOD criminal investigation organization.
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

18 U.S.C. Certificationof Richard A. Mansfield

Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer of

Duckwall-ALCOStores, Inc.

I, Michael S.Marcus, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.,hereby certify, in  accordance with 18U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(a)          TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 2006, whichaccompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)         The information containedthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2005, whichaccompanies this certification, fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toDuckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and will be retained by Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

Dated:  September 13, 2006
|        | By:    | */s/ Michael S, Marcus*                 |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Michael S. Marcus                       |
|   |   | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R.H. Donnelley Corporation for the
period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officers knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of R.H. Donnelley
Corporation as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    SVP and Chief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2005
    
    May 10, 2005
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 72
*Pursuant to 5th Cir. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50820

Summary Calendar

 

CAMILLA A. HANCOCK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LOUIS CALDERA,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

(SA-01-CV-1130)

________________________________________________________________

December 30, 2002

Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This pro se appeal is from a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal.

Plaintiff alleged: her employer (United States Army) subjected her

to retaliation because she had earlier complained of

discrimination; and the retaliation took the form of a hostile and

abusive work environment. The district court granted the motion to

dismiss.
2

Subsequent to that dismissal, however, Swierkiewicz v. Sorema

N.A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002), was decided. It held a plaintiff need

not plead specific facts required to establish the elements of a

prima facie Title VII claim under McDonell Douglas Corp. v. Green,

411 U.S. 792 (1973). 534 U.S. at 508. The Court noted that the

prima facie case under McDonell Douglas is an evidentiary, rather

than a pleading, standard. The complaint need only contain “a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is

entitled to relief”, see FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a), thereby placing

defendant on notice of “what the plaintiff’s claim is and the

grounds upon which it rests”. 534 U.S. at 512 (internal citations

omitted). Moreover, Swierkiewicz held that even the elements of a

prima facie case can “vary depending on the context”. Id. 

In the light of Swierkiewicz, the district court issued an

Order and Advisory, stating: the dismissal was improvidently

granted; and it would be receptive to a motion for reconsideration.

Plaintiff, however, had already filed her notice of appeal. 

Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the district court for

it to examine plaintiff’s complaint under the standard stated in

Swierkiewicz.

VACATED AND REMANDED
Press releaseJanuary 27,
2004

# Appointments in Dynea
Group

Mr Roger Carlstedthas been
appointed President and CEO of Dynea Oy on November 5, 2003, and President and CEO of
Dynea International Oy and Dynea Chemicals Oy on January 22, 2004.

The Group Management also consists of
Mr Filip Frankenhaeuser, continuing as Executive Vice President and CFO, Mr
Pertti Silanterä,continuing as Executive Vice President and Deputy to the
CEO, and newly appointed Mr Tom Vestli,Executive Vice President. These
appointments are effective as of January 26, 2004.

Dyneas business operations are
reported in two divisions, Panel Board Resins and Industrial & Surfacing.

Roger Carlstedt, President and
CEO, will also be responsible for the Industrial & Surfacing division.

Tom Vestli, Executive Vice
President, is responsible for the Panel Board Resins division and Supply & Logistics.

Filip Frankenhaeuser, Executive
Vice President and CFO, will continue to be responsible for Finance and Treasury.

Pertti Silanterä,
Executive Vice President, Technology, and Deputy to the CEO, will be responsible for
R&D, Manufacturing Excellence & HSE, Process Technology and IT.

The former CEO of Dynea International
Oy, Mr Øivind Isaksen, will take on new responsibilities within the Dynea
Group.

# Dynea facts

Dynea is one of the worlds
leading providers of adhesion and surfacing solutions. With more than fifty production
units in 24 countries in Europe, the Americas and Asia Pacific, Dynea employs 3,200
persons. In 2002, Dynea had combined revenues of approximately EUR 1.0 billion.

Dyneas Panel Board Resins
division includes the Panel Board Resins Europe, Panel Board Resins North America and
Panel Board Resins Asia Pacific Business Lines. The Industrial & Surfacing division
includes the Industrial Resins, Wood & Specialty Adhesives and Paper Overlays Business
Lines. Business Line operations are managed by Senior Vice Presidents.

For more information,
please contact:Ms Leslie Petersen, Dynea Communications, tel +358 10 585 2031, mobile +358 50 385 2031
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,455,491
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    189,265
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         201,080
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,171,389
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,017,225
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      769,153
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             15,440
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 784,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,500
<PREFERRED>                                    224,440<F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,060,469
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       19,500
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  175,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     14,992
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                40,016
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,693,715
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,017,225
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      555,215
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            35,251
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     406,477
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     441,728
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        113,487
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              14,392
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 127,879
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        63,435<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                    64,444
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,980
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   62,464
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        66,254
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       37,849
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         136,857
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes $13,832 of Preference Stock.
<F2>Includes $6,281 of Monthly Income Preferred Securities dividend requirements.
</FN>


</TABLE>
exv10w37w1



 






Exhibit 10.37.1









March 27, 2006




John West

c/o Solexa, Inc.

25861 Industrial Boulevard

Hayward, CA 94545




     Re: Modification of Bonus Terms


Dear John:



As you know, you are eligible to receive a bonus under the Solexa, Inc. Company 2005-2006 Bonus
Plan (the “Plan”). Your Target Bonus under the Plan is forty percent (40%) of all base salary
earned by you from January 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006 (the “Bonus Period”).



Pursuant to Exhibit B of your written employment agreement with Solexa, Inc. (the “Company”) dated
June 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”), you are eligible to receive four different “annual and
special performance bonuses” on the terms set forth in subparagraphs (a) – (d) of Exhibit B to that
agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Sections A, B, C and D”).



You understand and agree that the Plan supersedes and replaces the performance bonus provisions set
forth in Sections A and B, and that the Plan sets forth the terms and conditions governing any
performance bonus payable to you for your services during the Bonus Period. Accordingly, you will
not be eligible for, or receive, any bonus earnings for your services pursuant to Section A or B
for your services during that time. You will, however, continue to be eligible to earn bonuses
pursuant to Sections C and D during and after the Bonus Period.



Effective July 1, 2006, Section B will become effective again. (Section A will have already lapsed
and expired by its terms, and will no longer have any force or effect.) You will be eligible to
receive a performance bonus for your services in 2006 on the terms and conditions set forth in
Section B; provided, however, that any such bonus will be pro-rated to reflect your partial year
service from July 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (which were not covered by the Plan).



Eligible employees in director and senior director level positions and executive-level positions
will be paid bonuses on or after August 31, 2006 based on SBS Revenues received during the Bonus
Period, and on or after November 30, 2006 for amounts based on SBS Revenues received during the
Backlog Period on a “rolling basis”, paid out of the Company’s incremental positive net cash flow
in any positive cash flow month.




 









 




Except as expressly modified herein, your employment will continue to be governed by all terms and
conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement.



Please sign and date below to confirm your understanding and agreement to the terms set forth
above.




Sincerely,




	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Kathy
San Roman 	 	 
	Kathy San Roman 	 	 	 
	Vice President Human Resources and Administration

Solexa, Inc.
	 
	 







Understood and Agreed:




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/
John West

	 	Dated:	 	3/28/06
	 

	 	 	 	 
	John West