alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
American Vantage Companies

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statement No 333-00905
on Form S-8 of American Vantage Companies of our report dated October 8, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of American Vantage Companies as of
July 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which
report appears in the July 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB of American
Vantage Companies.

/s/ BRADSHAW, SMITH & CO., LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
October 27, 1999
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Nomination of Ben S. Bernanke

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	One Hundred Ninth Congress, 2005-2007. 						*Nomination of Ben S. Bernanke : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, First Session, November 15, 2005*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										November 15, 2005,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/273,			accessed on September 11, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert T. DeVincenzi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(i)           the Quarterly Report of LaserCard Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LaserCard Corporation.




Date:  November 9, 2010




/s/ Robert T. DeVincenziRobert T. DeVincenzi

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 000300tp
- 00040000
- 00050000
- 00060000
- 00070001
- 00080002
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110000
- 00120000
- 00130000
- 00140000
- 00150003
- 00160004
- 00170000
- 00180000
- 00190000
- 00200000
- 00210000
- 00220000
- 00230000
- 00240000
- 00250005
- 00260006
- 00270007
- 00280000
- 002900bi
- 003000bc
Exhibit 15.1
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  The Board of Directors
 Given Imaging Ltd:
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (File No. 333-111310 and 333-152335) on Form S-8 of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. of our report dated March 6, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Given Imaging Ltd. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2011, which report appears in the December 31, 2011 annual report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd.
 
 Our report refers to the adoption by the Company of ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition included in ASC Topic 605: Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements and ASU 2009-14, Software included in ASC Topic 985, as of January 1, 2010.
  /s/ Somekh Chaikin
 Somekh Chaikin
 Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
 Member firm of KPMG International
  Haifa, Israel
 March 6, 2012
### §302. Delegation of authority

(a) For the purpose of this section, "agency" has the meaning given it by section 5721 of this title.

(b) In addition to the authority to delegate conferred by other law, the head of an agency may delegate to subordinate officials the authority vested in him—

(1) by law to take final action on matters pertaining to the employment, direction, and general administration of personnel under his agency; and

(2) by section 3702 of title 44 to authorize the publication of advertisements, notices, or proposals.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 379; Pub. L. 94–183, §2(1), Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1057.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 22a. | Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 744, §12, 60 Stat. 809. |

Statutes at Large

Clause (2) of former section 22a is omitted because of the repeal of R.S. §3683 (31 U.S.C. 675) by the Act of Sept. 12, 1950, ch. 946, §301(76), 64 Stat. 843.

The word "agency" is substituted for "department" and defined to conform to the definition of "department" in section 18 of the Act of Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 744, 60 Stat. 811.

In subsection (b), the words "In addition to the authority to delegate conferred by other law," are added for clarity and in recognition of the various reorganization plans which generally have transferred all functions of the departments and agencies to the heads thereof and have authorized them to delegate the functions to subordinates.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1975—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 94–183 substituted "3702" for "324".
#### § 187.6 Information requirements.

The documents to be prepared under § 187.5(d) and Enclosures 1 and 2, “Requirements for Environmental Considerations—Global Commons,” and “Requirements for Environmental Considerations—Foreign Nations and Protected Global Resources,” respectively, are assigned Report Control Symbol DD-M(AR) 1327.

[44 FR 21786, Apr. 14, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 56 FR 64481, Dec. 10, 1991]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**ANDREW GESSLEIN,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 20 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 23rd day of September, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           Year                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Feb-01-1998          Jan-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          Feb-03-1997          Feb-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            Feb-01-1998          Nov-01-1998
<CASH>                                        2,555               6,496
<SECURITIES>                                      0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 3,158               4,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0                   0
<INVENTORY>                                 103,445             128,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            111,289             139,202
<PP&E>                                       70,774              78,258
<DEPRECIATION>                              (30,627)            (34,670)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              158,114             189,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        35,303              47,583
<BONDS>                                           0                   0
<COMMON>                                          1                   1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                       0                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                   80,393              83,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                158,114             189,257
<SALES>                                     323,254              85,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            323,254              85,308
<CGS>                                       212,982              56,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               212,982              56,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            3,525               1,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              12,281               1,785
<INCOME-TAX>                                  4,790                 666
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           7,491               1,119
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                  7,491               1,119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.47                 .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.46                 .22
        

</TABLE>
#### Hilda Herscher, as Executrix of Harry Cherkoff, Deceased, Respondent, v. Raleigh Hotel Corp. et al., Appellants.

In an action by the executrix of an estate seeking, *inter alla,*to compel the decedent’s former partners to account with respect to certain claimed assets of the estate, the defendants appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 27, 1963, which denied their motion, pursuant to rule 107 of the former Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint; and (2) from an order of said court, dated August 9, 1963, which, upon renewal of the motion qn additional papers, again denied the motion. Order of August 9, 1963 denying the renewed motion, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Defendant’s time to *897answer the complaint extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Appeal from order of May 27, 1963 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the later order of August 9, 1963. [For prior appeal relating to this estate, see *Matter of Gherkoff,*9 A D 2d 557, affg. 19 Mise 2d 69.] Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### § 37.1330 Procurement contract.

A Federal Government procurement contract. It is a legal instrument which, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6303, reflects a relationship between the Federal Government and a State, a local government, or other recipient when the principal purpose of the instrument is to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the Federal Government. See the more detailed definition of the term “contract” at 48 CFR 2.101.
**DJI Inspire 1 Users Guide ver 1.2 references for Section 333. Compass Calibration (pg 49)**  **Low Battery Auto Go Home**Dynamic home point Current RTH (return to home)Low battery alarm
#### In the Matter of Anthony J. Anselmo et al., Appellants, v. Nelson A. Rockefeller, as Governor of the State of New York and Commander-in-Chief, et al., Respondents.

In an article 78 [Civ. Prae. Act] proceeding in the nature of mandamus petitioners appeal from an order of Supreme Court at Special Term which dismissed the petition. Petitioners employed in civilian capacities- as National Guard technicians at a Federal missile base located in New York State were first suspended and later dismissed from their employment. Their petition alleges that they occupied permanent positions in the competitive class of the classified civil service of the. State and were entitled before discharge to a hearing upon stated charges (Civil Service Law, § 75, subd. 1, par. [a,]) *762which eoneededly was not afforded them. Restoration to their former statuses with back pay is the relief which is sought. The positions occupied by petitioners were created by a Federal statute (U. S. Code, tit. 32, § 709, stibds. [a], [¡b]); their compensation was fixed by the Secretary of the Army and wholly paid from Federal funds. (U. S. Code, tit. 32, § 709, subds. [e], [f].) Regulations which he promulgated for administering the Army National Guard Technician Program under delegated authority to the Adjutants General of the various States governed their employment and discharge, controlled their work activities and the conditions of their employment in respect to salary schedules, pay periods, leaves of various types, hours of work, travel and per diem allowances, brought them within the purview of the Federal Employee’s Compensation Act, granted Federal unemployment insurance benefits and subjected them to the provisions of the so-called Hatch Act. (National Guard Regulations No. 51.) The Federal Government has assumed liability for their torts (U. S. Code, tit. 32, § 715) and has undertaken the payment of the employer’s contributions to the Social Security system. These indicia of employment demonstrate to our satisfaction that petitioners in their roles of civilian technicians were not State employees and hence were not improperly deprived of the benefits of the discharge procedure provided by the Civil Service Law of the State. *(Matter of Paris*[Corsil, 283 App. Div. 236, affd. 308 N. Y. 698; see, also, *Washington State Nat. Guard*v. *Washington State Personnel Bd.,*379 P. 2d 1002 [Wash.].) As members of the State militia petitioners are expressly excluded from the civil service of the State. (Military Law, § 1, subd. 6; § 19, subd. 4; Civil Service Law, § 2, subd. 5.) Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Coon, J. P., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
§ 50.5 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (PDUSD(P&R)), under the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall: ( 1 ) Identify and publish policies and procedures governing personal commercial solicitation on DoD installations consistent with the policy set forth in this part.
( 2 ) Maintain and make available to installation commanders and appropriate Federal personnel the current master file of all individual agents, dealers, and companies who have their privileges withdrawn at any DoD installation.
( 3 ) Develop and maintain a list of all State Insurance Commissioners' points of contact for DoD matters and forward this list to the Military Services.
( b ) The Heads of the DoD Components shall: ( 1 ) Ensure implementation of this part and compliance with its provisions.
( 2 ) Require installations under their authority to report each instance of withdrawal of commercial solicitation privileges.
( 3 ) Submit lists of all individuals and companies who have had their commercial solicitation privileges withdrawn at installations under their authority to the PDUSD(P&R) in accordance with this part.
<PAGE>
<PAGE>  1
                         ENDORSEMENT NO. 2
                                TO
                         SERVICE AGREEMENT
                    (DATED AS OF JUNE 1, 1994)


    WHEREAS, pursuant to Article VII, Section 2 of the Service
Agreement among and between WICOR, Inc. ("WICOR"), Wisconsin Gas
Company, Sta-Rite Industries, Inc. and WEXCO of Delaware, Inc.,
and SHURflo Pump Manufacturing Co., dated as of June 1, 1994
("Agreement"), new subsidiaries acquired by WICOR may become
parties to the Agreement by endorsement after review and approval
by the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin; and

    WHEREAS, on July 19, 1995, WICOR acquired all of the outstanding
common stock of Hypro Corporation; and

    WHEREAS, the parties desire to add Hypro Corporation as a party
to the Agreement by endorsement;

    NOW, THEREFORE, Hypro Corporation agrees to become a party to
the Agreement and to be bound by all the terms and conditions of
the Agreement.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Hypro Corporationhas caused this Endorsement
to be executed in its name and on its behalf by its duly
authorized officers as of the 19th day of July, 1995.




ATTEST:                      Hypro Corporation
    

R.A. Nuernberg                    By  W. Ted Dudley
Assistant Secretary                       Chairman<PAGE>
§ 516.34 Referral of medical care and property claims for litigation. ( a ) *Criteria for referral.* The RJA will forward the claims file and a litigation report (See § 516.35 of this part) through USARCS to Litigation Division when the claim has not been resolved administratively and any of the following conditions exist: ( 1 ) The claim exceeds $5,000;
( 2 ) It involves collection from the injured party or his attorney;
( 3 ) The claim raises an important question of policy; or,
( 4 ) There is potential for a significant precedent.
( b ) *Alternative methods.* When none of the conditions cited in the preceding subparagraph are present, the RJA may refer the claim directly to the U.S. Attorney for the district in which the prospective defendant resides. Similar property claims may be referred through USARCS to DOJ's Nationwide Central Intake Facility (NCIF) rather than directly to the U.S. Attorney. Notice of all such referrals shall be provided through USARCS to Tort Branch, Litigation Division. The RJA should be ready to provide support to the U.S. Attorney if requested.
( c ) *Closing files.* A file referred directly to the U.S. Attorney will be closed if the U.S. Attorney determines further action is unwarranted. If the RJA disagrees, the file should be forwarded with the RJA's recommendation through USARCS to Litigation Division.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 13 July 2006 – Italy v Commission**

**(Case T-225/04)**

Structural Funds – Financing of Community initiatives – Amendment of indicative allocations – Enforcement of the final judgment – Judgment annulling an act

1.                     *Economic and social cohesion – Structural assistance – Community financing (Council Regulation No 2052/88, Art. 12(4)) (see
paras 67-77)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Judgment annulling act – Effects (Art. 233 EC) (see paras 89-94)*

3.                     *Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope (Art. 253 EC) (see paras 145-155)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2003) 3971 final of 26 November 2003 establishing indicative allocations between the Member States of the commitment appropriations under Community initiatives for the period 1994-1999 and of all related prior measures. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the application; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and the costs of the defendant. |
### §308705. Designation of America's National Maritime Museum

(a) In General.—America's National Maritime Museum shall be composed of the museums designated by law to be museums of America's National Maritime Museum on the basis that the museums—

(1) house a collection of maritime artifacts clearly representing the Nation's maritime heritage; and

(2) provide outreach programs to educate the public about the Nation's maritime heritage.

(b) Initial Designation.—The following museums (meeting the criteria specified in subsection (a)) are designated as museums of America's National Maritime Museum:

(1) The Mariners' Museum, located at 100 Museum Drive, Newport News, Virginia.

(2) The South Street Seaport Museum, located at 207 Front Street, New York, New York.

(c) Future Designation of Other Museums Not Precluded.—The designation of the museums referred to in subsection (b) as museums of America's National Maritime Museum does not preclude the designation by law of any other museum that meets the criteria specified in subsection (a) as a museum of America's National Maritime Museum.

(d) Reference to Museums.—Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to a museum designated by law to be a museum of America's National Maritime Museum shall be deemed to be a reference to that museum as a museum of America's National Maritime Museum.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3242.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 308705 | 16 U.S.C. 5409. | Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1068, Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2135. |

Section
Exhibit 15.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNo. 333-111310on Form S-8 of our report dated March 2, 2006 (March 1, 2007 as to the effect
of the restatement), relating to the financial statements of A.M.T. Advanced Metal Technologies Ltd. for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (not presented separately herein),appearing in the annual report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd for the year ended December 31, 2006.



/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.



Certified Public AccountantsA member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu





Tel Aviv, IsraelJune 25, 2007

---