alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Associated Metals *&*Minerals Corporation, Appellant, and Kemikalija, Respondent.

Order, entered 'February 29, 1960, denying petitioner-appellant’s motion to stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The refusal of the buyer to make payment for the balance due on goods sold and delivered was a sufficient dispute authorizing arbitration within the provisions of the broad arbitration clause contained in the contract of sale. To the extent that *Matter of Webster*v. *Van Allen*(217 App. Div. 219 [4th Dept.]) seems to point to the contrary, the reasoning and conclusion in that case are not found persuasive. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Eager, JJ. [23 Misc 2d 98.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                        206,239
<SECURITIES>                  930,000<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              224,895
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,752,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         290,284
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      608,293
<OTHER-SE>                    854,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,752,816
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              114,261
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 50,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               63,714
<INCOME-TAX>                  28,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  35,714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
<FN>
<F1>
United States Treasury Obligations.
        

</TABLE>
##### 



(1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period June 30,
2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Jeffrey A. LudrofJeffrey A. LudrofPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Philip A. GarciaPhilip A. GarciaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   36
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-1

PLATE 3

GULF OF MEXICO

UPPER CLAIBORNE AQUIFER

100
Memphis

GULF OF MEXICO

MIDDLE WILCOX AQUIFER

0 25 50 MILES

0 25 50 KILOMETERS

BOUNDARY OF
STUDY AREA

BOUNDARY OF

"eer.

az

fombiabee jp

Te

LOUISIANA pen

River

) 25 50 MILES

GULF OF MEXICO 0 25 50 KILOMETERS GULF OF MEXICO

BOUNDARY OF
STUDY AREA

25

50 MILES

0 25 80 KILOMETERS

MIDDLE CLAIBORNE AQUIFER LOWER CLAIBORNE-UPPER WILCOX AQUIFER

BOUNDARY OF

BOUNDARY OF
.— STUDY AREA

‘STUDY AREA

EXPLANATION

100 and 500 feet

9 Baton Rouge

25

50 MILES

GULF OF MEXICO 0 25 50 KILOMETERS

0 25 50 KILOMETERS

LOWER WILCOX AQUIFER

——200— Line of equal sand thickness—Interval

—— —— Downdip extent of aquifer—Area north
of line has dissolved-solids concentrations
less than 10,000 milligrams per liter

MAPS SHOWING TOTAL SAND THICKNESS OF THE UPPER CLAIBORNE, MIDDLE CLAIBORNE,
LOWER CLAIBORNE-UPPER WILCOX, MIDDLE WILCOX, AND LOWER WILCOX AQUIFERS,
MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT AQUIFER SYSTEM, SOUTH-CENTRAL UNITED STATES
#### BROADWAY TRUST CO., Respondent, v. HART, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by the Broadway Trust Company against Max Hart, alias Max Hertz. M. D. Steuer, for appellant. I. L. Bamberger, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
### Part D—Acquisitions
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1362 

Expressing condemnation of political violence and denouncing the attempted 

assassination of Former President Donald J. Trump. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2024 

Mr. MILLER of Ohio (for himself and Mr. MOSKOWITZ) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing condemnation of political violence and denouncing 

the attempted assassination of Former President Donald 

J. Trump. 

Whereas political violence undermines the democratic principles upon which our nation is founded, threatening the 

safety and security of all citizens; 

Whereas the recent attack on the former President of the 

United States is a reprehensible act that violates the rule 

of law, a cornerstone of our democracy; 

Whereas such acts of violence serve to incite fear, division, 

and instability within our society, detracting from constructive political discourse and the pursuit of common 

goals; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1362 IH 

Whereas it is the responsibility of all elected officials, political 

leaders, and citizens to promote a culture of respect, tolerance, and nonviolence in political engagements and 

public discourse; 

Whereas the condemnation of political violence in all its 

forms is essential to safeguarding the integrity of our 

democratic institutions and ensuring the safety of public 

servants and private citizens alike; 

Whereas the attack on the former President represents not 

only an attack on an individual but also an assault on the 

democratic values that unite our nation; 

Whereas it is imperative that justice is pursued for those responsible for acts of political violence, and that appropriate measures are taken to prevent future occurrences; 

and 

Whereas the strength of our democracy depends on our collective commitment to resolving differences through 

peaceful means and upholding the rule of law; 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) calls on United States Government officials 

3 and politicians to— 

4 (A) condemn the attempted assassination 

5 of former President Donald J. Trump; 

6 (2) condemn political violence in all its forms; 

7 (3) recognize this attack as an assault not only 

8 on the former President but also on our collective 

9 democracy; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1362 IH 

1 (4) recognize that all elected officials, political 

2 leaders, and citizens— 

3 (A) have the freedom for spirited debate 

4 and to honorably and respectfully showcase dif5 ferences in opinion; and 

6 (B) have the responsibility to always put 

7 country over political affiliation and serve the 

8 people of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2008285EN.01005401.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/54

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 25 September 2008 — Guido Strack v Commission

(Case F-44/05) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Rejection of candidature - Action for annulment and for damages - Admissibility - Interest in bringing proceedings - Retirement - Preselection comittee - Composition - Temporal application of new provisions - Independence - Impartiality - Notification of a decision)

(2008/C 285/96)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Guido Strack (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: J. Mosar initially, then by M. Wehrheim, then by F. Gengler, lastly by P. Goergen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and H. Kraemer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's decision to reject the applicant's candidature for the post of head of the ‘Calls for tender and contracts’ unit and to appoint another candidate to that post and, secondly, an application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the application for annulment of the decision to appoint Mr A to the post of head of the ‘Calls for tender and contracts’ unit of the Publications Office of the European Communities as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application for annulment of the decision to appoint Mr A to the post of head of the ‘Calls for tender and contracts’ unit of the Publications Office of the European Communities as inadmissible;

| 2. | Annuls the decision to reject the candidature of Mr Strack for the post of head of the ‘Calls for tender and contracts’ unit of the Publications Office of the European Communities; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision to reject the candidature of Mr Strack for the post of head of the ‘Calls for tender and contracts’ unit of the Publications Office of the European Communities;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the applicant EUR 2 000 by way of damages; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the applicant EUR 2 000 by way of damages;

| 4. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 5. | Orders Mr Strack to bear half of his own costs; |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Mr Strack to bear half of his own costs;

| 6. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay its own costs and half of the costs incurred by Mr Strack. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay its own costs and half of the costs incurred by Mr Strack.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 20.8.2005. p. 28 (Case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-225/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard M. Haddock, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LaserCard Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

        (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

        (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2004

/s/ Richard M. Haddock
----------------------
Richard M. Haddock
Co-Chief Executive Officer


                                       38
Exhibit 32.1

 

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

I, Leonard A. Rosenbaum, President and Chief Executive Officer of CVD Equipment Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2017 of CVD Equipment Corporation (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CVD Equipment Corporation.

 

 

| Dated: May 1, 2018 | /s/ Leonard A. Rosenbaum      |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                    | Leonard A. Rosenbaum          |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer) |
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55-56]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29115]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-202-2020]


Approval of Expansion of Subzone 18F, Lam Research Corporation, 
Fremont, California

    On November 12, 2020, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the City of San 
Jose, grantee of FTZ 18, requesting an expansion of Subzone 18F, 
subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 18, on behalf of Lam 
Research Corporation, in Fremont, California.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (85 FR 73458-73459, November 18, 2020). The FTZ staff examiner 
reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for

[[Page 56]]

approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board 
Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to expand 
Subzone 18F was approved on December 29, 2020, subject to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further 
subject to FTZ 18's 2,000-acre activation limit.

    Dated: December 29, 2020.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-29115 Filed 12-31-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**EXHIBIT 12.2****DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES****Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred and Preference Stock DividendRequirements**                           (Millions of Dollars)   Three Months Ended      June 30,  Year Ended December 31,   **2006**  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001    **Fixed Charges:**                        Interest on long-term debt **$****20.8**  $47.4  $45.6  $53.1  $55.2  $62.3 Other interest  **0.2**   1.3   1.4   1.5   2.2   0.7 Company obligated mandatorilyredeemable preferred securitiesdividend requirement (a)  **—**   —   —   6.3   12.6   12.6 Portion of lease payments representingan interest factor  **1.5**   2.0   2.5   3.9   1.9   3.1 Dividend requirements  **4.0**   8.0   6.6   3.2   3.3   3.4                    Total Fixed Charges **$****26.5**  $58.7  $56.1  $68.0  $75.2  $82.1                                             **Earnings:**                        Net income **$****14.3**  $73.0  $67.8  $69.6  $75.4  $53.4 Income tax expense  **8.9**   42.5   44.3   45.4   48.9   30.8 Fixed charges as above  **26.5**   58.7   56.1   68.0   75.2   82.1                    Total Earnings **$****49.7**  $174.2  $168.2  $183.0  $199.5  $166.3                                             **Ratio Of Earnings To Fixed Chargesand Preferred and Preference StockDividend Requirements**  **1.88**   2.97   3.00   2.69   2.65   2.03                     (a) From July 1, 2003 until their redemption in 2004, dividends on the monthly incomepreferred securities were included with interest on long-term debt due to the adoption ofSFAS No. 150.
41
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven K. Young, Chief Financial Officer and Comptroller of Duke Energy Carolinas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Carolinas.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/    STEVEN K.
YOUNG                 
|Steven K. Young                        
|Chief Financial Officer and Comptroller
|August 12, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,312
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                       106
<INVENTORY>                                     10,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,720
<PP&E>                                          62,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,638
<BONDS>                                         16,498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           815
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,749
<SALES>                                         12,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,156
<CGS>                                            9,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (294)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (993)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (993)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Davis, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed January 25, 1977. Sentence affirmed (see People v McGowen, 42 NY2d 905). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of
Double Eagle Petroleum Co. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004,
each of Stephen H. Hollis, the Chief Executive Officer, and David C. Milholm,
the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief: (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 14, 2004                   /s/  Stephen H. Hollis
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Stephen H. Hollis
                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                       /s/ David C. Milholm
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                        David C. Milholm
                                        Chief Financial Officer
### §6122. Flexible schedules; agencies authorized to use

(a) Notwithstanding section 6101 of this title, each agency may establish, in accordance with this subchapter, programs which allow the use of flexible schedules which include—

(1) designated hours and days during which an employee on such a schedule must be present for work; and

(2) designated hours during which an employee on such a schedule may elect the time of such employee's arrival at and departure from work, solely for such purpose or, if and to the extent permitted, for the purpose of accumulating credit hours to reduce the length of the workweek or another workday.

An election by an employee referred to in paragraph (2) shall be subject to limitations generally prescribed to ensure that the duties and requirements of the employee's position are fulfilled.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, but subject to the terms of any written agreement referred to in section 6130(a) of this title, if the head of an agency determines that any organization within the agency which is participating in a program under subsection (a) is being substantially disrupted in carrying out its functions or is incurring additional costs because of such participation, such agency head may—

(1) restrict the employees' choice of arrival and departure time,

(2) restrict the use of credit hours, or

(3) exclude from such program any employee or group of employees.

(Added Pub. L. 97–221, §2(a)(2), July 23, 1982, 96 Stat. 228.)