alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1544. Congressional action

#### (a) Transmittal of report and referral to Congressional committees; joint request for convening Congress

Each report submitted pursuant to section 1543(a)(1) of this title shall be transmitted to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate on the same calendar day. Each report so transmitted shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate for appropriate action. If, when the report is transmitted, the Congress has adjourned sine die or has adjourned for any period in excess of three calendar days, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, if they deem it advisable (or if petitioned by at least 30 percent of the membership of their respective Houses) shall jointly request the President to convene Congress in order that it may consider the report and take appropriate action pursuant to this section.

#### (b) Termination of use of United States Armed Forces; exceptions; extension period

Within sixty calendar days after a report is submitted or is required to be submitted pursuant to section 1543(a)(1) of this title, whichever is earlier, the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces with respect to which such report was submitted (or required to be submitted), unless the Congress (1) has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces, (2) has extended by law such sixty-day period, or (3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Such sixty-day period shall be extended for not more than an additional thirty days if the President determines and certifies to the Congress in writing that unavoidable military necessity respecting the safety of United States Armed Forces requires the continued use of such armed forces in the course of bringing about a prompt removal of such forces.

#### (c) Concurrent resolution for removal by President of United States Armed Forces

Notwithstanding subsection (b), at any time that United States Armed Forces are engaged in hostilities outside the territory of the United States, its possessions and territories without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, such forces shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution.

(Pub. L. 93–148, §5, Nov. 7, 1973, 87 Stat. 556.)
#### PEOPLE ex rel. CAPRON, Respondent, v. CLARK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people, on the relation of Albert S. Capron, against Orson Clark and another.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and determination reversed with costs and disbursements of this appeal, and writ dismissed with $50 costs and disbursements.

STOVER, J., not voting.
#### GUILES, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF CATTARAUGUS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 1, 1903.)

Action by Emma E. Guiles against the village of Cattaraugus.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### BRONNER, Appellant, v. FULLER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 20, 1903.)

Action by Emanuel Bronner against Bert Fuller.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Ibsen Potter et al., Appellants, v. James Clark et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The order grants a motion of the defendant Clark for an order severing the cause of action as against Clark from all other issues and for separate trial. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff wife was in two separate automobile accidents in Syracuse, New York, one on October 14, 1960 and the other on the 20th of October, 1960. In each case it was alleged that while her ear was standing still it was struck in the rear by another automobile, the first the Clark vehicle, and the second the Lewis vehicle. Permanent injuries are claimed. It is the plaintiffs’ contention that, because of difficulties of proof as to cause, aggravation and the like, if the eases are tried separately each defendant will try to place the blame on the other for all or most of the injuries, and the plaintiffs might not be as completely protected as if they were tried together. This case is the type that particularly lends itself to a single trial. The claims against the defendants should be tried and presented together under sections 212 and 258 of the Civil Practice Act. Section 212 does not necessarily require identity of parties, and section 258 specifically does not. “ ‘ Complete freedom should be allowed in the joinder of causes of action as in the joinder of parties, and it is submitted that the correct approach to the joinder of parties and of causes of action is the English one: May the matters conveniently be tried together?”’ *(Great Northern Tel. Co.*v. *Yokohama Specie Bank,*297 N. Y. 135, 141.) These cases may conveniently be tried together; in fact there are many reasons why they should be tried together in the interests of justice. We conclude therefore that a provident exercise of discretion would have dictated the denial of the motion at Special Term. *(Wilson*v. *Algeria,*5 Misc 2d 520; *Better*v. *Butuola,*203 Misc. 723; see, also, *Bresler v. Brunt,*9 A D 2d 596.) The codefendant Lewis moved for an order directing plaintiffs to separately state and number each cause of action. The Special Term Justice did not pass on that motion because, in view of the granting of Clark’s motion it had become academic. No order of denial was entered and this matter is not before us. However, in view of our reversal, that motion is not now necessarily academic. The order appealed from should be reversed without prejudice to the right of Lewis to renew his motion to separately state and number if so advised. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term granting defendant Clark’s motion severing the causes of action against defendant Clark.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.
Conference Call with Tribal Environmental Professionals

April 21, 2010

Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On April 21, 2010, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

participated in a meeting to update interested members from the National Tribal Air 

Association (NTAA) on the status of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and 

Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed the: 

• Proposed schedule for finalizing the rule
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 EAGLEPICHER HOLDINGS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of EaglePicher Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
H. Weber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1984; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John H. Weber
    
    Date: July 12, 2004John H. Weber, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 252.3 Definitions.

These terms and their definitions are for the purposes of this part.

*DoD personnel and their families.* Members of the Military Services and their family members and DoD civilian employees and their family members.

*Military Services.* The Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps.

*Qualified scouting organization.* The Girl Scouts of the United States of America (GSUSA) and the Boy Scouts of America (BSA).

*Sponsored organization or sponsored council.* Scouting organizations or councils authorized to operate as scouting affiliates on military installations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                     
<ARTICLE>                                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
                           
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                      426
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            22,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                866
<INVENTORY>                              20,485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         45,195
<PP&E>                                    5,157
<DEPRECIATION>                           11,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           55,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    28,175
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  2,346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                               22,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             55,649
<SALES>                                  26,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         26,223
<CGS>                                    19,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            19,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          5,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             678
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         678 
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                678 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.11 
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.11   



</TABLE>
#### § 1803.33 Determination by NACIC Office Chiefs.

Each NACIC Office Chief in charge of an office which originated or has an interest in any of the records subject to the appeal, or designee, is a required party to any appeal; other interested parties may become involved through the request of the Coordinator when it is determined that some or all of the information is also within their official cognizance. These parties shall respond in writing to the Coordinator with a finding as to the classified status of the information including the category of protected information as set forth in § 1.5 of this Order, and, if older than ten (10) years, the basis for continued classification under §§ 1.6 and 3.4 of this Order. These parties shall also provide a statement as to whether or not there is any other statutory, common law, or Constitutional basis for withholding as required by § 6.1(c) of this Order. This response shall be provided expeditiously on a “first-in, first-out” basis taking into account the business requirements of the parties and consistent with the information rights of members of the general public under the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                     18,134
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                             187,824
<ALLOWANCES>                              (43,783)
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          162,175
<PP&E>                                     22,692
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,250)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,505,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     454,266
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                   13,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,505,111
<SALES>                                   805,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          805,655
<CGS>                                     788,777
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             788,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         (144,391)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          9,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           151,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       151,751
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              151,751
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.01


</TABLE>
### §244. Maritime security capabilities assessments

Not later than 180 days after October 5, 2018, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives, an assessment of the number and type of maritime assets and the number of personnel required to increase the Department's maritime response rate pursuant to section 223 of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §436, as added Pub. L. 115–254, div. J, §1811(a), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3538.)
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1301 

Expressing support for the inaugural Heart Recovery Awareness Day on 

February 20, 2025. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2024 

Mr. MOULTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the inaugural Heart Recovery 

Awareness Day on February 20, 2025. 

Whereas cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death 

both globally and in the United States; 

Whereas one-third of all global deaths in 2021 were caused 

by a cardiovascular condition; 

Whereas cardiovascular disease accounted for 12 percent of 

total United States health expenditures from 2018–2019; 

Whereas heart recovery, which preserves the native heart, is 

a burgeoning field of medicine; 

Whereas heart recovery will positively impact Medicare resources through reduced hospital expenditures, reduced 

length of hospital stays, and fewer repeat hospital visits; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1301 IH 

Whereas heart recovery is increasingly helping patients live 

longer and fuller lives with their native hearts intact; and 

Whereas February 20, 2025, is designated to observe Heart 

Recovery Awareness Day: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives sup2 ports— 

3 (1) the goals of Heart Recovery Awareness 

4 Day; 

5 (2) increasing awareness of innovative treat6 ments available to patients with cardiovascular dis7 ease; 

8 (3) improving outcomes and quality of life for 

9 patients with heart failure; and 

10 (4) expanding access to treatments that change 

11 the standard of care for heart failure, such that all 

12 Americans regardless of age, gender, or geography 

13 can have an opportunity to preserve their native 

14 heart. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### §7504. Regulations

The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe regulations to carry out the purpose of this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title II, §204(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1135.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1101 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11


                NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


                Statement re computation of per share earnings

                Statement of Computation of Earnings per Share



                                      For the Year
                                    Ended December 31
                              ----------------------------
                                2000      1999      1998
                              --------  --------  --------

Net Earnings                  $  7,889  $ 12,685  $ 14,518
                              ========  ========  ========

Average common shares
   outstanding                  15,005    15,005    15,005
                              ========  ========  ========

Basic and diluted earnings
   per share                  $    .53  $    .85  $    .97
                              ========  ========  ========
[No. 9402.

Department Two.

August 3, 1911.]

#### Jessie W. Fish, *as Administrator etc., Appellant,*v. Thomas Fear *et al., Respondents.**1*

Taxation—Tax Titles—Actions to Vacate—Limitation of Actions. An action to cancel a tax deed is harred within three years, by Rem. & Bal. Code, § 162, although the tax judgment on which- it was based was void for want of jurisdiction.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Preble, J., entered September 26, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, -dismissing an action to quiet title.

Affirmed.

*Parker Richards,*for appellant.

*Floyd Hatfield,*for respondents.

1

Reported in 116 Pac. 1083.

Per Curiam.

This is an action to quiet title, but in effect to set aside and vacate a tax deed executed and delivered by the treasurer of Yakima county, more than three years prior to the commencement of the action.

The only question before us is whether the tax deed, conceded to be regular in form, is of itself sufficient to sustain respondents’ title, after the running of the statute of limitations, Rem. & Bal. Code, § 162. Appellant contends there is an irregularity in the tax foreclosure proceedings which deprived the court of jurisdiction, and that he is now entitled to question the validity of the foreclosure decree upon *415which the tax sale and the tax deed are predicated. The trial court entered an order of dismissal, for the reason that the action had not been commenced within the time limited by law. On the authority of *Huber v. Brown,*57 Wash. 654, 107 Pac. 850, and *Baylis v. Kerrich, ante*p. 410, 116 Pac. 1082, the judgment must be affirmed. It is so ordered.
### §255. Report on improving enforcement functions

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, not later than 1 year after being sworn into office, shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations and the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate a report with a plan detailing how the Bureau of Border Security, after the transfer of functions specified under section 251 of this title takes effect, will enforce comprehensively, effectively, and fairly all the enforcement provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) relating to such functions.

#### (b) Consultation

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall consult with the Attorney General, the Secretary of State, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Labor, the Commissioner of Social Security, the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, and the heads of State and local law enforcement agencies to determine how to most effectively conduct enforcement operations.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §445, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2194.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Immigration and Nationality Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163, which is classified principally to chapter 12 (§1101 et seq.) of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of Title 8 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Bureau of Border Security, referred to in subsec. (a), changed to Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement by Reorganization Plan Modification for the Department of Homeland Security, eff. Mar. 1, 2003, H. Doc. No. 108–32, 108th Congress, 1st Session, set out as a note under section 542 of this title.
§ 22.215 Distinguishing grants and cooperative agreements. ( a ) Once a grants officer judges, in accordance with §§ 22.205 and 22.210, that either a grant or cooperative agreement is the appropriate instrument, the grants officer shall distinguish between the two instruments as follows: ( 1 ) Grants shall be used when the grants officer judges that substantial involvement is not expected between the Department of Defense and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated in the agreement.
( 2 ) Cooperative agreements shall be used when the grants officer judges that substantial involvement is expected. The grants officer should document the nature of the substantial involvement that led to selection of a cooperative agreement. Under no circumstances are cooperative agreements to be used solely to obtain the stricter controls typical of a contract.
( b ) In judging whether substantial involvement is expected, grants officers should recognize that “substantial involvement” is a relative, rather than an absolute, concept, and that it is primarily based on programmatic factors, rather than requirements for grant or cooperative agreement award or administration. For example, substantial involvement may include collaboration, participation, or intervention in the program or activity to be performed under the award.
### §20928. Requiring majority approval for actions

Any action which the Commission is authorized to carry out under this chapter may be carried out only with the approval of at least three of its members.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title II, §208, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–252, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1666, known as the Help America Vote Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15328 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
EXHIBIT 32.1


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), We, Craig T Dunham, President and Chief Executive Officer of The
Company and Laura Lunardo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
        of The Company.



                                /s/ Craig T Dunham
                              -------------------
                              Craig T Dunham
                              President and Chief Executive
                              Officer


                                /s/ Laura Lunardo
                              -------------------
                              Laura Lunardo
                              Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2008