Name: John M. McManus

Title: Vice President- Environmental Service

Company: American Electric Power

Sign Date: 6/30/2010

Name: Scott W. Banach

Title: Director, Project Engineering

Company: Platt Environmental Services, Inc

Sign Date: 6/25/2010

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

Kammer Unit 3

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 1 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Facility Information:

Kammer Unit 3

State Route 2

Moundsville W 26041

Contact: Paul Jackson

Phone: 614-716-3278

Fax: 614-716-1252

Email: pmjackson@aep.com

Testing Company:

Platt Environmental Services, Inc.

1520 Kensington Road

Suite 204

Oak Brook IL 60523

Contact: Scott Banach

Phone: 630-521-9400

Fax: 630-521-9494

Email: sbanach@plattenv.com

Air Permit Number:

R30-05100006-2009

Permitted Source ID/Name:

Unit 3 Boiler 3

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:

N/A

Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:

N/A

Target Process Test Rate

N/A

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

Electric generating wet bottom cyclone boiler utilizing bituminous coal. Control equipment consists of an 

electrostatic precipitator and overfire air. Unit is rated at 2156 mmBTU/hr. Unit shares a common stack with units 1 

and 2.

Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description 10100203 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal - Cyclone Furnace (Bituminous Coal) 

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Stack 276 0 0 0 5238 4824 4 16

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Stack 2,3,7,8-TCDD Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD Method 23 3 8 0

Stack OCDD Method 23 3 8 0

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 2 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

Stack 2,3,7,8-TCDF Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF Method 23 3 8 0

Stack OCDF Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 3,3',4,4'-TCB (PCB77) Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 3,4,4',5-TCB (PCB81) Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 2,3,3',4,4'-PeCB (PCB105) Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 2,3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB114) Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 2,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB118) Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 2',3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB123) Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 3,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB126) Method 23 3 8 0

2,3,3',4,4',5/2,3,3',4,4',5'-

HxCB (PCBs156/157)

Stack Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 2,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB167) Method 23 3 8 0

Stack 3,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB169) Method 23 3 8 0

2,3,3',4,4',5,5'-HpCB 

(PCB189)

Stack Method 23 3 8 0

Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 2 0

Stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 2 0

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 3 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack - Method 23

Average

Run Number M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Test Date 2/23/2010 2/24/2010 2/25/2010

Run Start Time 9:00:00 AM 8:15:00 

AM

8:55:00 AM

Run Finish Time 5:30:00 PM 4:35:00 PM 5:20:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 480 480 480

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 305.513 406.851 419.788 377.384

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 6.20 6.00 6.06 6.087

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000

Carbon Dioxide, % 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.700

Oxygen, % 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.667

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 261.47 259.84 259.75 260.353

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,211,017.8 1,190,273.9 1,199,124.4 1,200,138.70

0

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 1,825,767.7 1,786,629.9 1,800,839.2 1,804,412.26

7

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 100.8 103.2 101.700

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 4 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 5 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Emissions Summary

Location: Stack - Method 23

Compound: 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000015 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.80E-13 1.45E-13 1.41E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.73E-04 1.39E-04 1.35E-04 0.000

Compound: 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000048 0.0000000039 0.000000011 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 5.76E-13 3.54E-13 9.68E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 5.55E-04 3.39E-04 9.26E-04 0.001

Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000019 0.0000000017 0.000000002 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 2.28E-13 1.54E-13 1.76E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 2.20E-04 1.48E-04 1.68E-04 0.000

Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.45E-13 1.41E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.39E-04 1.35E-04 0.000

Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.0000000015 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.45E-13 1.32E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.39E-04 1.26E-04 0.000

Compound: 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.0000000015 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.45E-13 1.32E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.39E-04 1.26E-04 0.000

Compound: 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000015 0.0000000014 0.0000000014 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.80E-13 1.27E-13 1.23E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.73E-04 1.22E-04 1.18E-04 0.000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 6 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Compound: 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000015 0.0000000015 0.0000000015 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.80E-13 1.36E-13 1.32E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.73E-04 1.30E-04 1.26E-04 0.000

Compound: 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000018 0.0000000018 0.0000000017 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 2.16E-13 1.63E-13 1.50E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 2.08E-04 1.56E-04 1.43E-04 0.000

Compound: 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.0000000016 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.45E-13 1.41E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.39E-04 1.35E-04 0.000

Compound: 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000015 0.0000000016 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.36E-13 1.41E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.30E-04 1.35E-04 0.000

Compound: 2,3,3',4,4',5,5'-HpCB (PCB189)

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.000000012 0.0000000076 0.000000012 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.44E-12 6.90E-13 1.06E-12 0.000

ng/dscm 1.39E-03 6.60E-04 1.01E-03 0.001

Compound: 2,3,3',4,4',5/2,3,3',4,4',5'-HxCB (PC

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000049 0.0000000048 0.0000000077 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 5.88E-13 4.36E-13 6.78E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 5.66E-04 4.17E-04 6.48E-04 0.001

Compound: 2,3,3',4,4'-PeCB (PCB105)

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000081 0.0000000047 0.0000000054 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 9.71E-13 4.27E-13 4.75E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 9.36E-04 4.08E-04 4.54E-04 0.001

Compound: 2,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB167)

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000048 0.0000000047 0.0000000075 0.000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 7 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

lb/mmBtuO2 5.76E-13 4.27E-13 6.60E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 5.55E-04 4.08E-04 6.31E-04 0.001

Compound: 2,3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB114)

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.000000008 0.0000000046 0.0000000053 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 9.59E-13 4.18E-13 4.66E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 9.25E-04 3.99E-04 4.46E-04 0.001

Compound: 2,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB118)

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000078 0.0000000045 0.00000031 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 9.35E-13 4.09E-13 2.73E-11 0.000

ng/dscm 9.02E-04 3.91E-04 2.61E-02 0.009

Compound: 2',3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB123)

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000081 0.0000000047 0.0000000054 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 9.71E-13 4.27E-13 4.75E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 9.36E-04 4.08E-04 4.54E-04 0.001

Compound: 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000018 0.0000000017 0.0000000017 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 2.16E-13 1.54E-13 1.50E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 2.08E-04 1.48E-04 1.43E-04 0.000

Compound: 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000015 0.0000000015 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.36E-13 1.32E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.30E-04 1.26E-04 0.000

Compound: 2,3,7,8-TCDD

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.000000002 0.0000000017 0.0000000017 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 2.40E-13 1.54E-13 1.50E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 2.31E-04 1.48E-04 1.43E-04 0.000

Compound: 2,3,7,8-TCDF

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000016 0.0000000015 0.0000000018 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-13 1.36E-13 1.58E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.85E-04 1.30E-04 1.51E-04 0.000

Compound: 3,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB169)

Average

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 8 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Process Run Data

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.000000005 0.0000000049 0.0000000078 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 6.00E-13 4.45E-13 6.86E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 5.78E-04 4.25E-04 6.56E-04 0.001

Compound: 3,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB126)

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.000000008 0.0000000046 0.0000000053 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 9.59E-13 4.18E-13 4.66E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 9.25E-04 3.99E-04 4.46E-04 0.001

Compound: 3,3',4,4'-TCB (PCB77)

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.000000015 0.0000000064 0.0000000098 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.80E-12 5.81E-13 8.62E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 1.73E-03 5.56E-04 8.25E-04 0.001

Compound: 3,4,4',5-TCB (PCB81)

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000067 0.0000000082 0.0000000096 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 8.03E-13 7.44E-13 8.45E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 7.75E-04 7.12E-04 8.08E-04 0.001

Compound: OCDD

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.000000003 0.0000000052 0.0000000035 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 3.60E-13 4.72E-13 3.08E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 3.47E-04 4.51E-04 2.94E-04 0.000

Compound: OCDF

Average

RunNumber M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Mass_mg 0.0000000041 0.0000000038 0.0000000039 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 4.92E-13 3.45E-13 3.43E-13 0.000

ng/dscm 4.74E-04 3.30E-04 3.28E-04 0.000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 9 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Process Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 Bituminous Coal Burned 91.4 Tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

86

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 10 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 Bituminous Coal Burned 90.3 Tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

86

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 11 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

3 Bituminous Coal Burned 92.9 Tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

86

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 12 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

1 Steam Temperature 1002 Degrees F The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 13 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 Steam Temperature 1002.4 Degrees F The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 14 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

3 Steam Temperature 967.5 Degrees F The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 15 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

1 Steam Pressure 2000.8 PSIG The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

2000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 16 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 Steam Pressure 2000.2 PSIG The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

2000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 17 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

3 Steam Pressure 2000 PSIG The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

2000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 18 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

1 Excess Air 12.7 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

13

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 19 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 Excess Air 13.6 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

13

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 20 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

3 Excess Air 12.6 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

13

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 21 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

1 Duct Opacity 6.1 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

10

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 22 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 Duct Opacity 7.6 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

10

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 23 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

3 Duct Opacity 6.5 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

10

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 24 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

1 PPT 42.5 # in Service The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

48

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 25 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

2 PPT 40.9 # in Service The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

48

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 26 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

3 PPT 38.4 # in Service The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

48

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

42.5 # in Service 48

2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

40.9 # in Service 48

3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

38.4 # in Service 48

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 27 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack - Method 23

Average

Run Number M23-1 M23-2 M23-3

Test Date 2/23/2010 2/24/2010 2/25/2010

Run Start Time 9:00:00 AM 8:15:00 AM 8:55:00 AM

Run Finish Time 5:30:00 PM 4:35:00 PM 5:20:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 36 36 36

Net Run Time, minutes 480 480 480

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.199 0.232 0.232 0.221

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.002 1.002 1.002 1.002

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.13 29.13 29.13 29.130

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.11 2.03 2.05 1.730

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 307.843 408.158 419.308 378.436

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 60.47 59.39 57.16 59.007

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 305.513 406.851 419.788 377.384

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 429.2 551.8 575.5 518.833

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 20.20 25.97 27.09 24.420

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 6.20 6.00 6.06 6.087

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000

Dry Mole Fraction 0.938 0.94 0.9394 0.939

Carbon Dioxide, % 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.700

Oxygen, % 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.667

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.7 80.6 80.6 80.633

Fuel Factor 1.15 1.14 1.14

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.06 30.06 30.06 30.060

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.31 29.34 29.33 29.327

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -3 -3 -3 -3.000

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.91 28.91 28.91 28.910

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 261.47 259.84 259.75 260.353

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.2217124983

8789

1.173781599

38876

1.192285077

73315

1.196

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 73.24 71.67 72.24 72.383

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 415.476 415.476 415.476 415.476

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,211,017.8 1,190,273.9 1,199,124.4 1,200,138.7

00

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 1,825,767.7 1,786,629.9 1,800,839.2 1,804,412.2

67

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 100.8 103.2 101.700

Percent Excess Air, % 67.7 69.2 69.2 68.700

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 276 276 276

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 28 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 29 of 30
Kammer Unit 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 30 of 30