alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 EAGLEPICHER HOLDINGS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of EaglePicher Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John H. Weber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1984; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John H. Weber
    
    Date: April 5, 2004John H. Weber, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

     Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of GPS Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

                  (i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
         quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                  (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 21, 2007              /s/ MICHAEL MARTIN
                                      ---------------------
                                      Michael Martin
                                      Principal Accounting  Officer
Order entered May 16, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01464-CR

No. 05-18-01482-CR

MACKENZIE RENE CHESNEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 401-81645-2017 & 401-81646-2017

ORDER

The reporter’s record, requested December 5, 2018, was due March 14, 2019. By 

postcard dated March 18, 2019, we notified court reporter Kimberly Tinsley that the reporter’s 

record was past due and directed her to file, by April 17, 2019, the reporter’s record or written 

verification that no hearings were recorded. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed, and 

we have had no communication from Ms. Tinsley. 

We ORDER court reporter Kimberly Tinsley to file the reporter’s record in these appeals 

WITHIN TWENTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. We caution Ms. Tinsley that 

the failure to do so will result in the Court taking whatever remedies it has available, including 

ordering that she not sit until the reporter’s record is filed.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Mark Rusch, 

Presiding Judge, 401st Judicial District Court; Kimberly Tinsley, court reporter, 401st Judicial 

District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### HOGOBOOM v. LANDCRAFT PROPERTIES

No. 483P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 208

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997. Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the orders of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County and the decision and orders of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 November 1997.
### §722. Urban Search and Rescue Response System

#### (a) In general

There is in the Agency a system known as the Urban Search and Rescue Response System.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the system for fiscal year 2008, an amount equal to the amount appropriated for the system for fiscal year 2007 and an additional $20,000,000.

(Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §634, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1421.)
<TABLE>

                                                   HEALTHY PLANET PRODUCTS, INC.
                                               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                                      December 31, 1996 and 1995
                                                                      Exhibit 11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<CAPTION>
                                                                     1995          1996
                                                                  -----------    -----------
<S>                                                               <C>            <C>        
Primary earnings per share
     Net income                                                   $ 2,144,900    $   252,100
     Cumulative dividends on preferred stock                           (9,000)        (9,000)
                                                                  -----------    -----------

Income applicable to common stock                                 $ 2,135,900    $   243,100
                                                                  ===========    ===========

Shares
     Weighted average number of common shares outstanding         $ 1,645,005    $ 1,823,612
     Add dilutive effect of conversion of preferred stock and
         outstanding options and warrants (as determined by the
         application of the treasury stock method)                    396,640        190,011
                                                                  -----------    -----------

                                                                  $ 2,041,645    $ 2,013,623
                                                                  ===========    ===========

Primary earnings per share (1)                                    $      1.05    $      0.12
                                                                  ===========    ===========
<FN>

(1)  Fully diluted  earnings per share does not differ from primary earnings per
     share, because the effect would be antidilutive.
</FN>
</TABLE>

                                                                     Page F - 17
### SUBCHAPTER II—SECURITY OF THE INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY CHAIN
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAxial-torsional fatigue: A study of tubular specimen thickness effectsA room-temperature experimental program was conducted on AISI type 316 stainless steel to determine the effect of wall thickness on the cyclic deformation behavior and fatigue life of thin-wall, tubular, axial-torsional fatigue specimens. The following experimental variables were examined in this study: the depth of the surface work-hardened layer produced in specimen machining, and the effects of strain range and axial-torsional strain phasing. Tubular fatigue specimens were fabricated with wall thicknesses of 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm. One as-fabricated specimen from each wall thickness was sectioned for microstructural examination and microhardness measurement. A specimen of each wall thickness was tested at each of three conditions - high strain range in-phase, low strain range in-phase, and low strain range out-of-phase - for a total of nine axial-torsional fatigue experiments. The machining-induced work-hardened zone, as a percentage of the gage section material, was found to have a minimal effect on both deformation behavior and fatigue life. Also, little or no variation in fatigue life or deformation behavior as a function of wall thickness was observed. Out-of-phase fatigue tests displayed shorter fatigue lives and more cyclic hardening than in-phase tests.Document ID19910005319Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBonacuse, Peter J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Kalluri, Sreeramesh*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Brook Park OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberAD-A231725NASA-TM-103637NAS 1.15:103637E-5814AVSCOM-TM-90-C-014Accession Number91N14632Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-1BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910005319.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9054-4]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed December 7, 2020 10 a.m. EST Through December 14, 2020 10 a.m. EST

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

*Notice:*                     Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

EIS No. 20200260, Final Supplement, BR, CA, B.F. Sisk Dam Raise and Reservoir Expansion Project, Review Period Ends: 01/19/2021, Contact: Casandra Arthur 530-892-6202.

EIS No. 20200261, Draft Supplement, USACE, FL, Port Everglades Harbor, Broward County, Florida, Comment Period Ends: 02/01/2021, Contact: Angela Dunn 904-232-2336.

## Amended Notice

EIS No. 20200210, Draft, STB, UT, Uinta Basin Railway, Comment Period Ends: 01/28/2021, Contact: Joshua Wayland 202-245-0330.

Revision to FR Notice Published 10/30/2020; Extending the Comment Period from 12/14/2020 to 01/28/2021.

EIS No. 20200242, Draft, USACE, VA, Surry To Skiffes Creek to Whealton Transmission Project, Comment Period Ends: 02/10/2021, Contact: Randy Steffey 757-201-7579.

Revision to FR Notice Published 11/27/2020; Extending the Comment Period from 01/11/2021 to 02/10/2021.

Dated: December 14, 2020.

Cindy S. Barger,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2020-27888 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXHIBIT 23.2


Document: P:\DOC\HEPK.DOC
                                                       -66-

<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-73946  of Hallwood  Energy  Partners,  L.P.  on Form S-4 of our report  dated
February  28,  1997,  appearing  in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Hallwood
Energy Partners, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 1996.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 20, 1997

Document: P:\DOC\HEPK.DOC
                                                       -67-

<PAGE>
§ 196.310 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment.* A recipient to which §§ 196.300 through 196.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and admission of students. A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 196.110(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 196.110(b).
( b ) *Recruitment at certain institutions.* A recipient to which §§ 196.300 through 196.310 apply shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at educational institutions, schools, or entities that admit as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 196.300 through 196.310.
§ 241.5 Written agreements. ( a ) Before a detail begins, the DoD Component authorized approving official, private sector organization authorized approving official and the employee to be assigned to the ITEP detail must sign a three-party agreement. Prior to the agreement being signed the relevant legal office for the DoD Component shall review and approve the agreement. The agreement must include, but is not limited to the following elements: ( 1 ) The duties to be performed and length of detail;
( 2 ) Describe the core IT competencies and technical skills that the detailee will be expected to enhance or acquire;
( 3 ) Identification of the supervisor of detailee.
( b ) The agreement shall require DoD employees, upon completion of the assignment serve in the civil service for a period equal to the length of the detail; and
( c ) Provide that if the employee of the DoD or of the private sector organization (as the case may be) fails to carry out the agreement, such employee shall be liable to the United States for payment of all expenses of the assignment, unless that failure was for good and sufficient reason as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
### §8440f. Maximum percentage allowable for certain participants

(a) The maximum percentage allowable under this section shall be determined in accordance with the following table:

| **In the case of a pay period beginning in fiscal year:** | **The maximum percentageallowable is:** |
| --- | --- |
| 2001 | 6 |
| 2002 | 7 |
| 2003 | 8 |
| 2004 | 9 |
| 2005 | 10 |
| 2006 or thereafter | 100. |

in fiscal year:

allowable is:

(b) Notwithstanding any limitation under this section, an eligible participant (as defined by section 414(v) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) may make such additional contributions to the Thrift Savings Fund as are permitted by such section 414(v) and regulations of the Executive Director consistent therewith.

(Added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(4) [div. B, title I, §138(a)(7)(A)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–234; amended Pub. L. 107–304, §1(b)(2), Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 2363.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 414(v) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (b), is classified to section 414(v) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–304 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–304 effective as of the earliest practicable date determined by the Executive Director in regulations, see section 1(c) of Pub. L. 107–304, set out as a note under section 8351 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Morgan K. OBrien, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 24th day of March, 2005.



/s/ Morgan K. OBrienMorgan K. OBrien President and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered December 1 4 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 01091

- CR

BLAKE ANTHONY WOODAL L, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the C ounty Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 002

- 88546

- 2015



### O RDER

We REINSTATE this appeal

. On December 8, 2016, we abated this appeal for a hearing on why the reporter’s record

had not been filed. On December 12, 2016, court repo rter Kristen Kopp filed the reporter’s

record. In the interest of expediting this appeal, we VACATE that portion of our order requiring

a hearing and findings.

Appellant’s brief is due January 9, 2017.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
§ 516.55 Witnesses for a State or private litigant. ( a ) *Status of witness.* If authorized to appear as a witness for a state or private litigant, and the testimony to be given relates to information obtained in the performance of official duties, a military member will attend in a permissive TDY status. If authorized to appear as a witness, but the testimony does not relate to information obtained in the performance of official duties, a military member may be granted a pass or permissive TDY under AR 630-5, or be required to take ordinary leave. The status of a civilian employee will be determined under 5 CFR Chapter I.
( b ) *Travel arrangements.* The requesting party or state agency will make all travel arrangements for attendance of DA personnel authorized to appear as witnesses for a state or private litigant. The local commander may issue appropriate orders when necessary.
( c ) *Travel expenses.* The United States may not pay travel, meals, and lodging expenses of the witness, other than normal allowances for subsistence pursuant to the DOD Military Pay and Allowances Entitlements Manual. These expenses are solely a matter between the witness and the party seeking his appearance. Witnesses ordinarily should be advised to require advance payment of such expenses. Military personnel authorized to appear in a pass or permissive TDY status are not entitled to receive witness attendance fees, but may accept travel, meals, and lodging expense money from the requesting litigant. All witness fees tendered the military member, to the extent they exceed such actual expenses of the member, will be remitted to the Treasurer of the United States. A civilian employee authorized to appear in his or her official capacity will accept the authorized witness fees, in addition to the allowance for travel and subsistence, and make disposition of the witness fees as instructed by his or her personnel office.
( d ) *Funding by the United States.* Requests for DA personnel to appear at government expense as witnesses in state or local proceedings for a party other than the United States, including cases involving domestic violence or child abuse, will be referred to Litigation Division. Litigation Division may authorize travel and per diem expenses under § 516.54 when the case is one in which the United States has a significant interest.
§ 251.3 Definitions. Unless otherwise noted, these terms and their definitions are for the purposes of this part. *Consultant.* Defined in 5 CFR part 304.
*Excepted service.* Appointments in the excepted service are civil service appointments within the Federal Government that do not confer competitive status and are excepted from competitive service by or pursuant to statute, by the President, or by the Office of Personnel Management, and which are not in Senior Executive Service.
*Foreign language.* Any language other than English.
*Language proficiency.* The U.S. Government relies on the Interagency Language Roundtable (ILR) scale to determine language proficiency. According to the ILR scale: ( 1 ) 0 is No Proficiency.
( 2 ) 0+ is Memorized Proficiency.
( 3 ) 1 is Elementary Proficiency.
( 4 ) 1+ is Elementary Proficiency, Plus.
( 5 ) 2 is Limited Working Proficiency.
( 6 ) 2+ is Limited Working Proficiency, Plus.
( 7 ) 3 is General Professional Proficiency.
( 8 ) 3+ is General Professional Proficiency, Plus.
( 9 ) 4 is Advanced Professional Proficiency.
( 10 ) 4+ is Advanced Professional Proficiency, Plus.
( 11 ) 5 is Functional Native Proficiency.
*Special government employee (SGE).* Defined in 18 U.S.C. 202.