alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### [§7341. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–83, §1(45)(B), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 208]

Section, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 526, related to receipt and display of foreign decorations. See section 7342 of this title.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 
| **NAME**                                            | ** ** | **JURISDICTION OF  INCORPORATION** |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|
|                                                |       |                               |
| Security Capital Insurance  Group, Inc.             |       | Delaware                           |
| Possible Dreams, Ltd.                               |       | Delaware                           |
| P.D. Holdings, Inc.                                 |       | Delaware                           |
| S Holdings, Inc.                                    |       | Delaware                           |
| S Ltd.                                              |       | Delaware                           |
| Primrose Holdings, Inc.                             |       | Delaware                           |
| Primrose School  Franchising Company                |       | Georgia                            |
| PS-Bentwater, Inc.                                  |       | Georgia                            |
| WC Holdings, Inc.                                   |       | Delaware                           |
| CompManagement, Inc.                                |       | Ohio                               |
| CompManagement Disability  Services Company         |       | Virginia                           |
| CompManagement Health  Systems, Inc.                |       | Ohio                               |
| CompManagement of  Virginia, Inc.                   |       | Virginia                           |
| CompManagement Integrated  Disability Services Inc. |       | Ohio                               |
| CMI Management Company                              |       | Ohio                               |
| CMI Barron Risk Management  Services, Inc.          |       | Texas                              |
| Octagon Risk Services,  Inc.                        |       | Minnesota                          |
| Integrated Claims  Strategies, Inc.                 |       | Florida                            |
| KRAMMCO, Inc.                                       |       | Ohio                               |
| Managed Care Holdings  Corporation                  |       | Delaware                           |
| Caronia Corporation                                 |       | Delaware                           |

 

----
**Exhibit 99-4**



SOCIAL
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT



---

# BULLETIN N° 192 / 2004*

---



DATE: 08/ 19/ 2004

**PEMEX ISSUED SHORT-TERM
NOTES FOR  PS. 500 MILLION IN THE DOMESTIC MARKET.**

| | • |  | **PEMEX received offers from investors for 17.1 times more than the established amount**
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • |  | **The transaction and  payment thereof  was formalized today**                          

Petróleos
Mexicanos issued today short-term peso-denominated notes (certificados bursátiles a
corto plazo) in the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A. de C.V. (the Mexican Stock Exchange),
for an amount of Ps. 500 million, which shall be used to fund the working capital of
Pemexs Treasury department.

As
part of its short-term notes program in the Mexican market of local debt, Pemex received
yesterday offers from investors for approximately Ps. 8.551 billion, an amount that
represented close to 17.1 times in excess of the announced amount.

The
Ps. 500 million were issued with a term of 27 days, and a weighted average rate of 7.19
per cent, which represents 0.06 per cent over the weighted average rate of the primary
auction placement of CETES at 27 days.

The  intermediary  leaders of this operation were  Scotiabank  Inverlat Casa de Bolsa,  S.A. de
  C.V. and Casa de Bolsa Santander Serfin, S.A. de C.V.

The filing of the short-term  notes before the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores,  S.A. de C.V. and the
  payment thereof took place today.

The terms and  conditions of the public offer of short-term  notes are included in the Internet
    page of Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A. de C.V. (www.bmv.com.mx).



---

********
Employment Agreement - Ric Florell



 Exhibit 10.35 
 June 14, 2005 
 Ric Florell 
 6026 Jamestown Park

 Orlando, FL 32819 
 Re: Employment Agreement
– Option 
 Dear Ric: 
 Pursuant to your Employment
Agreement dated June 26, 2002 under which you have been employed as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Resort Revenue Operations, we hereby exercise our option to extend the term for two (2) years, commencing on December 4,
2005 and continuing until December 3, 2007 such employment to be on all the same terms and conditions presently applicable to your employment. 
 Please
acknowledge your receipt of this letter and agreement to the foregoing additional term of your Employment Agreement by signing and returning one original of this letter to me. 
 Very truly yours, 
 UNIVERSAL ORLANDO 
 By: John Sprouls 
 ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED: 
  

							
				
	 /s/ Ric Florell
	 		 	   	 	 
	 Ric Florell
	 		 	 Date
§ 516.28 Policy. ( a ) *General.* Commanders, supervisors, and SJAs or legal advisers will give highest priority to compliance with the requirements of this chapter with regard to current or former DA personnel who face criminal charges or civil litigation in their individual capacity as a result of performance of their official duties.
( b ) *DOJ policy on representation.* If in the best interest of the United States, upon request of the individual concerned, and upon certification by his agency that he was acting within the scope of his employment, DOJ may represent present and former DA personnel sued individually as a result of actions taken within the scope of their employment. Representation can be declined for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to the following: the employee was not acting within the scope of his office; there is a conflict of interest; or, actions were not taken in a good faith effort to conform to law.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Philip A. Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of Erie Family Life Insurance Company, certify
that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Erie Family Life Insurance
Company;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:  a.
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: April 27, 2005/s/ Philip A. GarciaPhilip A. Garcia, Executive Vice President & CFO 30
Appeal No. 77-183.

#### Gertrude Corrente *v.*Roger Corrente, Jr.

*Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Alfred Factor,*for petitioner.

*Harry Weiss, John M. Sears, Rhode Island Legal Services, Inc., Alden C. Harrington,*of Counsel for respondent.

The petitioner’s motion to dismiss the respondent’s appeal is denied.

The stay previously granted by this court is to remain in full force and effect.
```

EXHIBIT 32.1
------------

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,  Raymond N.  Joeckel,  the  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of Eagle
Exploration Company,  (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal  quarter
     ended   September  30,  2004  (the   "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
     requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 15, 2004

                                        /s/  Raymond N. Joeckel
                                        -----------------------
                                        Name: Raymond N. Joeckel
                                        Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
```
#### Leonard Knauer, Respondent, v. City of Rochester, Appellant.

Appeal dismissed unless appellant’s briefs are filed and served on or before December 6, I960. Respondent’s briefs must be filed on or before December 23, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at January 1961 Term.
§ 21.540 What are the duties of the DoD Components' central points for the DAADS? The office that serves, in accordance with § 21.535, as the central point for collecting DAADS information from contracting activities within each DoD Component must: ( a ) Establish internal procedures to ensure reporting by contracting activities that make awards subject to 31 U.S.C. chapter 61.
( b ) Collect information required by the DAADS User Guide from those contracting activities, and report it to the DAADS Administrator, in accordance with §§ 21.545 through 21.555. Note that the DAADS User Guide, which a registered DAADS user may find at the Resources section of the DAADS website (*https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/daads/*), provides further information about required data elements and instructions for submitting data.
( c ) Submit to the DAADS Administrator any recommended changes to the DAADS.
[68 FR 47153, Aug. 7, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 51241, Aug. 19, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,289
<SECURITIES>                                   240,885
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,729,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,102
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,057,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          714,468
<BONDS>                                     11,104,810
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       184,960
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,057,732
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,411,916
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,407,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                       910
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,641
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 26.200 What must I do to comply with this part? There are two general requirements if you are a recipient other than an individual. ( a ) First, you must make a good faith effort, on a continuing basis, to maintain a drug-free workplace. You must agree to do so as a condition for receiving any award covered by this part. The specific measures that you must take in this regard are described in more detail in subsequent sections of this subpart. Briefly, those measures are to— ( 1 ) Publish a drug-free workplace statement and establish a drug-free awareness program for your employees (see §§ 26.205 through 26.220); and
( 2 ) Take actions concerning employees who are convicted of violating drug statutes in the workplace (see § 26.225).
( b ) Second, you must identify all known workplaces under your Federal awards (see § 26.230).
Aerial videography for geographical awareness and for reat astate marketing has !>een around

for a Iong time through manned fixed wing aircraft and helicopters, but for small business owners, its expense has been oostyrohibi6ve. Granting this exemption to High Flight Photo woukf allow us to provide this service at a much lower co.st . Further Small UAS will pose no threat to the public given its small size antl lack of combustible fuel when compared to larger manned aircraft. Operation of this UAS will minimize eoDlogical damage and promote eoonomio growth by providing informalion to oompanies looking to relocate or buikf in the Puget Sound
area.

/ e po Pms

~ dent/Chief Pitot High Flight Photo 85 Conifer Court Port Ludlow. Wash. 98365 360 301 0341 

### p[ghfliahtohotoCn qmail.com

0
#### Dave Weisberg, Appellant, v. Henry E. McGuigan et al., Respondents.

Appeal from ex parte order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on March 18, 1960, denying plaintiff a preference pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule IV of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, unanimously dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Order, entered June 3, 1960, denying plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of his application for a preference pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule IV of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         6,367,179
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,921,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    268,959
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,428,983
<PP&E>                                         2,823,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                 747,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,854,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,795,856
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       24,394
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,582,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,854,716
<SALES>                                        71,583,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               71,583,115
<CGS>                                          1,933,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  68,310,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (11,731)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             491,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,162,979
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,758,974
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,404,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,404,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.06
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       56158 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             56158 
<PP&E>                                      383462 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              439620 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        31642 
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   2078322 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                (1670344)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                439620 
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           2558673 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2558673)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 516.2 References.

Applicable publications and forms are listed in appendix A to this part.
1

Filed 10/19/15 Turner v. Superior Court CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

CASEY RYAN TURNER,

Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT O F

RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

Respondent;

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest. E064073

(Super.Ct.No. BLF1500012)

OPINION

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate and/or prohibition.

Charles Everett Stafford, Jr., Judge. Petition is grant ed in part and denied in part.

John Patrick Dolan for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Michael A. Hestrin, District Attorney, and Natalie M. Lough, Deputy District

Attorney, for Real Party in Interest.2

In this matter we have reviewed the pet ition and the opposition filed by real party

in interest. We have determined that resolution of the matter involves the application of

settled principles of law, and that issuance of a peremptory writ in the first instance is

therefore appropriate. ( Palm a v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171,

178.)

DISCUSSION

As pertinent, petitioner was charged with two counts of attempted dissuasion of a

witness under Penal Code section 136.1. One count

— that involving statements made to

the victim a t the time of the assault

— is clearly supported by the evidence introduced at

the preliminary hearing. However, the second count was directed towards later

harassment of the victim, and the victim could only testify that he recognized the voice of

a second perpetrator. No evidence connected petitioner with this harassment. The

People concede the point.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandate and/or prohibition is granted in part

and denied in part.

DISPOSITION

Let a peremptory writ of mandate is sue directing the Superior Court of Riverside

County to vacate its order denying petitioner’s motion to dismiss count 3 of the

information, and to enter a new order granting the motion in that respect only. In all

other respects the petition is denied.3

Pe titioner is directed to prepare and have the peremptory writ of mandate and/or

prohibition issued, copies served, and the original filed with the clerk of this court,

together with proof of service on all parties. I n the interest of justice and given the

concession by the People, this order shall be final forthwith.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

McKINSTER

J.

We concur:

RAMIREZ

P. J.

HOLLENHORST

J.
M. P. No. 77-194.

#### Catherine A. Greene *v.*Gloria M. McDonald *et al.*

*Everett Petronio,*for petitioner.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *John R. McDermott,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for defendant.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted and a writ shall issue forthwith. The stay previously granted by this court shall remain in full force and effect.
#### § 37.925 What requirements do I include for termination and enforcement?

Your TIA must apply the standards of 32 CFR 34.51 for termination, 32 CFR 34.52 for enforcement, and your organization's procedures implementing 32 CFR 22.815 for disputes and appeals.