alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 118 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 118

                         Maintaining Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

 Ms. Van Duyne (for herself, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Wittman, Mrs. Miller of 
 West Virginia, Mr. Moolenaar, Ms. Greene of Georgia, Mr. Mills, Mrs. 
 Lesko, Mr. McCormick, Mrs. McClain, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Donalds, and Mr. 
    Jackson of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                         Maintaining Medicare.

Whereas, created in 1965, Medicare was established to provide Government health 
        insurance to senior citizens;
Whereas now roughly 65,200,000 individuals utilize Medicare to provide health 
        care coverage;
Whereas under President Biden, health care prices have risen nearly 30 percent 
        in 2022 where seniors and everyday Americans saw the largest increase on 
        record;
Whereas, due in part to the increased cost of living caused by President Biden's 
        mismanagement of the economy, the standard Medicare beneficiary saw an 
        increase of $21.60 a month for their 2022 premiums;
Whereas, during the 117th Congress, funds meant for Medicare were reallocated to 
        pay for partisan policies outside of the Medicare program in the 
        Inflation Reduction Act;
Whereas Democrats cut over $289,000,000 out of Medicare to give insurance 
        companies handouts to boost Obamacare and finance Democrats' pet green 
        energy projects instead of strengthening Medicare for future 
        generations; and
Whereas President Biden has accused House Republicans of threatening to cut 
        Medicare: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the House of Representatives affirms current retirees 
        and those nearing retirement expect certain Medicare 
        commitments to be made, as Medicare has been one of the vital 
        pillars for senior citizens to access health care; and
            (2) it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
        its commitment to the United States is to save and strengthen 
        Medicare and no longer use Medicare as a slush fund to finance 
        Democrats' partisan policy agenda.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 905.822 Special performance standards—Operations in alluvial valley floors.

Part 822 of this chapter, Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Operations in Alluvial Valley Floors, shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations on alluvial valley floors.
Exhibit Exhibit (31.2)





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Rebecca A. Roof, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Eastman Kodak Company; and





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.












/s/ Rebecca A. RoofRebecca A. RoofInterim Chief Financial Officer







Date:          October 18, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ROUNDY'S
INC. FORM 10-K 405 FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 01-03-98 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                      52,366,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               86,998,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                150,898,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           301,707,400
<PP&E>                                     205,520,100
<DEPRECIATION>                             102,219,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             440,309,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      217,633,700
<BONDS>                                     83,457,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,362,400
<OTHER-SE>                                 114,722,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               440,309,800
<SALES>                                  2,610,696,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,614,392,400
<CGS>                                    2,362,355,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,362,355,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           221,908,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,389,100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,220,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,518,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,315,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,203,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,203,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

©FF8G8AL BUSI

STATE OF TEXAS/.

PENALTY FOR

12/17/2014 r

COOPER, MARCUS

4

ft

PITNEY BOWES

02 1M 9 UU

0004279596 DEC 1 8 2014

MAILED FROM ZjtfRIg^&'-fK

IS

This is to advise that the Court has denied without written order motion for leave to

file the original application for writ otmandamus

Abel Acosta, Clerk

JVIARCUSJ^OOPER

N3B "7B20"

!l2'00!MP6e¥^LVFORMATION

•'''•"''"'TOlDENTir' loganon

TO SENDE

tb .WCOMPLETBiNFWMATlON

ii'Mh-'ilimiil'-qi |N^^ I 1 1OCAlIONTO U- - •• _ •__ J
§ 45.8 Calculation of damages: disability rating. ( a ) *In general.* For certain purposes relating to calculating damages for a member in a claim under this part, DoD will use the disability rating established in the DoD Disability Evaluation System under DoD Instruction 1332.18[1] or otherwise established by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to assess the extent of the harm alleged to have been caused by medical malpractice. This rating is stated as a disability percentage under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) under 38 CFR part 4 or a successor provision. Under 10 U.S.C. 1216a, DoD is required to use the VASRD for assessing the degree of disability of a member under the Disability Evaluation System. DoD will use it for purposes of this part as well. A VASRD-based disability percentage represents the Government's estimate of the lost earning capacity attributable to an illness or injury incurred during military service. A Service member medically separated or retired through the Disability Evaluation System may receive distinct DoD and VA disability ratings. DoD will consider disability ratings, to the extent DoD deems pertinent, for other purposes relating to calculating damages, such as calculating loss of earning capacity and non-economic damages.
( b ) *Disability rating procedures.* ( 1 ) If a claimant disagrees with the disability rating received in the DoD or VA disability evaluation or claims processes, the member must pursue the appeal opportunities available within the DoD and/or VA to change the member's disability rating.
( 2 ) In any case in which a member has filed a claim under this part and also has a disability determination pending under DoD or VA disability evaluation or claims processes applicable to determinations or appeals, DoD may, in its discretion, hold in abeyance the claim under this part pending the outcome of the disability evaluation or claims process. DoD will notify the claimant that his or her claim is being held in abeyance.
( 3 ) In any case in which a member has not yet received a DoD or VA disability evaluation because the member is retained on active duty, DoD will use the VASRD as the standard for assessing the degree of disability of the member relevant to the member's claim under this part.
Footnotes -
45.8
[1] Available at *https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/133218p.pdf?ver=2018-05-24-133105-050 .*
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Stephan W. Zumsteg, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Energy Conversion
  Devices, Inc.;

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
  a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
  our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
  the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
  directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.



  Date: February 17, 2004                      /s/ Stephan W. Zumsteg
                                               ------------------------------
                                                   Stephan W. Zumsteg
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.4

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
Serologicals Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 28,
2003 (the "Report") as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 2, 2004



/s/ Harold W. Ingalls
--------------------------
Harold W. Ingalls
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1439 

Expressing support for the recognition of September 7, 2024, as ‘‘Liturgical 

Dance Day’’ and the International Dance Commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself, Mr. CARTER of Louisiana, Ms. WILSON

of Florida, and Mr. THANEDAR) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the recognition of September 7, 2024, 

as ‘‘Liturgical Dance Day’’ and the International Dance 

Commission, and for other purposes. 

Whereas, on September 7, 2024, the International Dance 

Commission will celebrate ‘‘Liturgical Dance Day’’ as 

dancers from around the world will take part in a day 

of fasting, prayer, and worship; 

Whereas, every Sunday morning, liturgical dance is expressed 

in thousands of ministries across the Nation, and liturgical dance ministers provide valuable outreach programs 

serving inner-city youth and instilling them with discipline, the desire to pursue excellence, and a love of 

dance; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1439 IH 

Whereas the International Dance Commission’s purpose is to 

serve as a multicultural umbrella organization and resource pool for dance, worship arts ministries, and dance 

companies throughout the world; and 

Whereas the members of the International Dance Commission dedicate themselves to service in their communities, 

sharing their gifts through the creative arts: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes ‘‘Liturgical Dance Day’’ and the International 

3 Dance Commission and its contributions to the creative 

4 arts and worship in communities across the State of Geor5 gia. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

In re :

Extensión de términos ante el paso de

la Tormenta Tropical Ernesto 202 4 TSPR 8 8

21 4 DPR ___

Número del Caso: E M

- 202 4

- 0 0 11

Fecha: 13 de agosto de 2024

Materia: Extensión de términos ante el paso de la Tormenta Tropical

Ernesto

Este documento está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del proceso

de compilación y publicación oficial de las decisiones del Tribunal

Supremo. Su distribución electrónica se hace como un servicio público

a la comunidad.EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

In re:

Extensión de t érminos ante EM

- 2024

- 00 11

el paso d e la Tormenta

Tropical Ernesto

RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 13 de agosto de 2024

.

A yer, 12 de agosto de 2024 , el Servicio Nacional de

Meteorología emitió un aviso de tormenta tropical para

todo Puerto Rico. En vista de la situación

climatológica, se decretó la suspensión de los trabajos

en el Poder Judicial a partir de las 12:00 p

. m

. de hoy

,

hasta el jueves

, 15 de agosto de 202 4 , cuando se

reanudarán las operaciones si las condiciones del

tiempo lo permiten.

Como resultado de lo anterior, y conforme nuestra

facultad para reglamentar los procedimientos judiciales

al computar los términos en las distintas leyes, reglas

o reglamentos que aplican a esos procedimientos, se

decreta que aplicará lo dispuesto en los artículos 388 y

389 del Código Político de 1902, 1 LPRA secs. 72 y 73.

En consecuencia, se considerará n el 13 y el 14 de agosto

de 202 4 como si fuera n día s feriado s . Cualquier término

que venza en esta s fecha s se extenderá hasta el jueves

,

15 de agosto de 2024 o hasta que las condiciones del

tiempo permitan reanudar las labores en los tribunales

y así se anuncie

.

S e decreta además que todo término que dispone el

Reglamento del Programa de Educación Jurídica Continua,

4 LPRA Ap. XVII

- F, se extenderá por igual periodo

.EM

- 202 4

- 0011 2

Se ordena la difusión pública e inmediata de esta

Resolución.

Notifíquese al Director Administrativo de los Tribunales,

al Director de la Oficina de Prensa de la Oficina de

Administración de los Tribunales y a la Directora del Programa

de Educación Jurídica Continua.

Publíquese.

Lo acordó el Tribunal y certifica el Secretario del

Tribunal Supremo.

Javier O. Sepúlveda Rodríguez

Secretario del Tribunal Supremo
#### Magda Velez, Respondent, v New York City Housing Authority et al., Appellants.

[831 NYS2d 704]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J), entered July 28, 2006, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiffs cross motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the cross motion denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff failed to file the motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim within the applicable period of limitations. The action is thus time-barred *(see Kellogg v Office of Chief Med. Examiner of City of N.Y.,*24 AD3d 376 [2005]; *Hall v City of New*York, 1 AD3d 254 [2003]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find *230them without merit. Concur—Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Marlow, Williams and Catterson, JJ.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Eagle  Exploration  Company  and
Subsidiaries  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Raymond N.  Joeckel,  Director,  Principal  Executive  and
Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                    /s/ Raymond N. Joeckel
                                    Raymond N. Joeckel
                                    Director, Principal Executive and
                                    Accounting and Financial Officer

Officer Dated:  February 13, 2003
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 147-148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29035]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--International Priority Airmail, 
Commercial ePacket, Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service Agreement: 
Postal Service\TM\

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add an International Priority Airmail, 
Commercial ePacket, Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service contract to 
the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Competitive Product 
List in the Mail Classification Schedule.

DATES: Date of notice: January 4, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 28, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add International Priority Airmail, Commercial ePacket, 
Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & 
First-Class Package International Service Contract 10 to Competitive 
Product List. Documents

[[Page 148]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-55 and CP2021-57.

Joshua J. Hofer,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-29035 Filed 12-31-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### § 1804.3 Contact for general information and requests.

For general information on this part, to inquire about historical access to NACIC records, or to make a formal request for such access, please direct your communication in writing to the Information and Privacy Coordinator, Executive Secretariat, 3W01 NHB, National Counterintelligence Center, Washington, DC 20505. Inquiries will also be accepted by facsimile at (703) 874-5844. For general information only, the telephone number is (703) 874-4121. Collect calls cannot be accepted.
#### John Hanson, trading as John Hanson & Company, appellee, v. Anna Behrens, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,614.

Action on written guaranty. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William L. Morgan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 11, 1925.

Rehearing denied May 25, 1925.

R. W. Vanier, for appellant.

William A. Either, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.