alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Effect of War-Contract Cut-Backs on Selected Plants

              																	Proudfoot, Betty Churchill					,	Sadler, George E.					,	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Division of Industrial Relations. 						*Effect of War-Contract Cut-Backs on Selected Plants : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 818*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4293,			accessed on September 11, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 5.1

<PAGE>


                                                                   April 7, 2005



Veolia Environnement
36-38 avenue Kleber
75116 Paris



Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

         In connection with a Registration Statement on Form S-8 under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), relating to the offering of up
to 2,199,274 Ordinary Shares, nominal value (euro) 5.0 per share (the
"Securities"), of Veolia Environnement (the "Company"), I, General Counsel of
the Company, have examined such corporate records, certificates and other
documents, and such questions of law, as I have considered necessary or
appropriate for the purposes of this opinion. Upon the basis of such
examination, I advise you that, in my opinion, such Securities have been validly
authorized and will, when issued, be validly issued, fully paid, and
non-assessable.

         The foregoing opinion is limited to the laws of France, and I express
no opinion as to the effect of the law of any other jurisdiction.

         I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement in giving such consent. I do not thereby admit that I am
in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act.

                                                          Very truly yours,



                                                          Alain Tchernonog
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350),
the undersigned, James R. Henderson, President and Chief Executive Officer of
ECC International Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 of
the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/James R. Henderson                
| |  |                                      
| |  |                                      
| |  | James R. Henderson                   
| |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | February 14, 2003                    

19
Statement on Air Quality Regulation o

Oil and Natural Gas Industry

Kathleen Sgamma

Director of Government Affairs

August 3, 2010
EPA Chart Showing Air Quality Trends Since 19

Source: Annual Report on Air Quality Trends, http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/2010/report/highlights.pdf, released Ma

Accompanying graphic at http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/images/comparison70.jpg
US Emissions Sources, 2008

Sources: EPA “National Air Quality Status and Trends through 2007” (EPA-454/R-08-006 November 2008), “National Air Quality an

(EPA-454/R-03-005 September 2003)

Source CO NOx SO2 PM10 

2008 Total (1000's Tons) 77,685 16,339 11,429 14,806 

Vehicles (On & Off Road) 73% 58% 5% 3% 

Utilities 1% 18% 66% 4% Oil and Gas Production 0.0% 1.3% 0.5% 0.0% Service Stations - Gasoline Recyling,Waste Disposal 2% 1% 0.2% 2% Dust (Cars,) 53%Solvent,Paint,Coating Forest Fires, Agriculture 13% 25% Industrial Process - Other 11% 22% 29% 13% 

Utilities 66%Oil and Gas Production 

Vehicles (On & Off Road) 73% 58% 
Regulation

Below is a partial list of recent regulations and their enactment dates by •NSPS JJJJ Stationary Spark Ignition Engines 01/18/08

•NSPS IIII Stationary Compression Ignition engines 7/11/06

•NSPS KKK Equipment Leaks of VOC from Natural Gas Processing Plants 1

•MACT HH Dehys and Flash Emissions – inclusion of area HAP sources 1/

•MACT ZZZZ Stationary spark ignition and compression ignition engines – Stationary RICE with more than 500 hp 6/15/04 – New and reconstructed stationary RICE located at area sources of HAP or 

rating of less than or equal to 500 hp located at major HAP sources 1/18/

– Stationary compression ignition RICE located at HAP area sources or that 

500 horsepower and are located at HAP major sources; and existing non-stationary compression ignition RICE with greater than 500 hp located at source 3/3/10

•Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS - one hour standard 4/12/10

•Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Petroleum and Natural Gas Sy

1/1/11
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00592-CV

IN RE Jonathan RIVAS

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 2, 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On September 15, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering 

the petition and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CVA000440D1, styled Roel Sauceda v. Jonathan Rivas, pending in 

the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Joe Lopez presiding.
### §822. Assessment of global catastrophic risk

#### (a) In general

The Secretary and the Administrator shall coordinate an assessment of global catastrophic risk.

#### (b) Coordination

When coordinating the assessment under subsection (a), the Secretary and the Administrator shall coordinate with senior designees of—

(1) the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs;

(2) the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy;

(3) the Secretary of State and the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security;

(4) the Attorney General and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

(5) the Secretary of Energy, the Under Secretary of Energy for Nuclear Security, and the Director of Science;

(6) the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the Assistant Secretary of Global Affairs;

(7) the Secretary of Commerce, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, and the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology;

(8) the Secretary of the Interior and the Director of the United States Geological Survey;

(9) the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Assistant Administrator for Water;

(10) the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration;

(11) the Director of the National Science Foundation;

(12) the Secretary of the Treasury;

(13) the Secretary of Defense, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, and the Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the Army Corps of Engineers;

(14) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff;

(15) the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development;

(16) the Secretary of Transportation; and

(17) other stakeholders the Secretary and the Administrator determine appropriate.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. G, title LXXIII, §7303, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3685.)
### **CHAPTER 9—EXECUTIVE REORGANIZATION**

Sec.
901.
Purpose.
902.
Definitions.
903.
Reorganization plans.
904.
Additional contents of reorganization plan.
905.
Limitations on powers. 1

906.
Effective date and publication of reorganization plans.
907.
Effect on other laws, pending legal proceedings, and unexpended appropriations.
908.
Rules of Senate and House of Representatives on reorganization plans.
909.
Terms of resolution.
910.
Introduction and reference of resolution.
911.
Discharge of committee considering resolution.
912.
Procedure after report or discharge of committee; debate; vote on final passage.
[913.
Omitted.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–614, §3(e)(3), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3193, substituted "passage" for "disapproval" in item 912.

**1977**—Pub. L. 95–17, §2, Apr. 6, 1977, 91 Stat. 29, reenacted chapter heading and items 901 to 903, 905 to 909, and 911 without change, substituted "plan" for "plans" in item 904 and "Introduction and reference of resolution" for "Reference of resolution to committee" in item 910, inserted "; vote on final disapproval" in item 912, and omitted item 913 "Decisions without debate on motion to postpone or proceed".

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
Exhibit 31.2

                              Certification by the
                             Chief Financial Officer
         Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements.

Certification

I,  Yona Liebowitz, Chief Financial Officer of Clean Systems Technology Group,
Ltd.., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Clean Systems Technology
Group, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:    May 28, 2004                       By:      /S/ YONA LIEBOWITZ
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Yona Liebowitz
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
The EPA National Library Network Strategic Plan began in 2012 and is captured in the file SP2012_2014. The website makes extensive use of Java and Teleport Pro was unable to emulate the functionality of the site.
### §522. Statutory construction

Nothing in this chapter, any amendment made by this chapter, or in section 1103 of title 8, shall be construed to limit judicial deference to regulations, adjudications, interpretations, orders, decisions, judgments, or any other actions of the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XI, §1103, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2274.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, known as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date of the transfer of functions from the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization to officials of the Department of Homeland Security (Mar. 1, 2003), see section 1104 of Pub. L. 107–296, as added by Pub. L. 108–7, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Family Spending and Saving in Wartime

              																	Cornfield, Jerome					,	Epstein, Lenore A. (Lenore Alice)					,	Jones, Alice Hanson, 1904-1985					,	United States. Congress. House					,	United States. Bureau of Human Nutrition and Home Economics					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Family Spending and Saving in Wartime : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 822*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4295,			accessed on September 24, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### Part H—Certificates of Plant Variety Protection
§ 1807.150 Program accessibility: existing facilities. ( a ) *General.* The NACIC shall operate each program or activity so that the program or activity, viewed in its entirety, is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. This program does not: ( 1 ) Necessarily require the NACIC to make each of its existing facilities accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities;
( 2 ) ( i ) Require the NACIC to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens.
( ii ) The NACIC has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1807.150(a) would result in that alteration or those burdens.
( iii ) The decision that compliance would result in that alteration of those burdens must be made by the Director after considering all of the NACIC's resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion.
( iv ) If an action would result in that alteration or those burdens, the NACIC shall take any other action that would not result in the alteration of burdens but would nevertheless ensure that individuals with disabilities receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
( b ) *Methods.* ( 1 ) The NACIC may comply with the requirements of this section through such means as redesign of equipment, delivery of services at alternate accessible sites, alteration of existing facilities, or any other methods that result in making its programs or activities readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities.
( 2 ) The NACIC is not required to make structural changes in existing facilities if other methods are effective in achieving compliance with this section.
( 3 ) In choosing among available methods for meeting the requirements of this section, the NACIC shall give priority to those methods that offer programs and activities to qualified individuals with disabilities in the most integrated setting appropriate.
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 12

- 00088

- CR

JAMIE LEE COKER, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 32988

- A

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jamie Lee Coker appeals from his conviction of intoxication assault and sentence of ten years’ imprisonment

. Coker has filed a single brief, in which he raises issues common to all of
his appeals. 1 He argues that (1) the waiver of his right to a jury trial and the stipu lations of evidence entered by him were involuntary , (2) the trial court erred in failing to reinstate the right to a jury trial and in allowing the use of his stipulations of evidence , and (3) the trial court erred in admitting “various State’s exhibits” over objections to their admissibility, including hearsay, Confrontation Clause, Fifth Amendment, and Texas Code of Criminal Appeals Article 33.22 objections.
We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Coker’s appeal in cause
numb er 06

- 12

- 00084

- CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has
not been shown in this case.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice
Date Submitted: June 18, 2013 Date Decided: June 19, 2013
Do Not Publish

1 Coker also appeals two conviction s of intoxication manslaughter , one resulting in a sentence of t wenty years’ imprisonment in our cause number 06

- 12

- 0008 4

- CR , the other resulting in thirty years’ impr isonment in our cause number 06

- 12

- 00085

- CR, and two other convictions for intoxication assault, each resulting in senten ces of ten years’ imprisonment in our cause numbers 06

- 12

- 0008 6

- CR and 06

- 12

- 00087

- CR.
#### VIRMANI v. PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH SERVICES CORP.

No. 62P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 71

Motion by defendant for temporary stay allowed 26 August 1997. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 September 1997. Petition by defendant for writ of supersedeas denied 4 September 1997.
### §1156. Nuclear material and explosive detection technology

The Secretary, in coordination with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the head of each relevant Federal department or agency researching nuclear material detection systems or explosive detection systems, shall research, facilitate, and, to the extent practicable, deploy next generation technologies, including active neutron interrogation, to detect nuclear material and explosives in transportation systems and transportation facilities.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, §1984, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the TSA Modernization Act and also as part of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, and not as part of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition

For definition of "Secretary" as used in this section, see section 1902 of Pub. L. 115–254, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 49, Transportation.