alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Cyril John, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel and Rabin, JJ.; McNally and Stevens, JJ., dissent with memoranda. McNally, J. (dissenting). In the light of the extent of the punishment provided for habitual *480offenders by chapter 549 of the Laws of 1960 adding section 998 to the Penal Law, effective September 1, 1960, I vote to modify the judgment of conviction by reducing the sentence to the time already served on the ground that the sentence is excessive, and to affirm the judgment as so modified. Stevens, J. (dissenting). I dissent and vote to reverse and dismiss the information on the ground of insufficiency of proof.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial informtion extracted from Cash Plus I
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,841,353
<SECURITIES>                                 5,151,696
<RECEIVABLES>                                  533,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,205
<PP&E>                                      45,380,739
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,298,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,718,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          831,240
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    37,887,283<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,718,523
<SALES>                                      6,437,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,437,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,013,764<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,423,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,423,555
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,423,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Represents total equity of General Partners (146,193) and Limited Partners
38,033,476.
<F2>Includes operating expenses of $1,922,590, real estate taxes $1,051,596, and
depreciation expense of $2,039,578.
<F3>Net income allocated $28,471 to general partners $1,395,049 to limited
partners, for year ending 12/31/95.  Average net income is (.35) per unit,
4,000,000 units outstanding.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENTOF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-55234) pertaining to theSecurity Capital Corporation 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan of our report datedJune 10, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Security Capital Corporation and subsidiaries in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 
|                  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                  |                      |
| Stamford, Connecticut |                      |
| June 20, 2005         |                      |

 

----
#### § 2400.5 Basic policy.

Except as provided in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, Executive Order 12356, as implemented by Directive No. 1 and this Regulation, provides the only basis for classifying information. The policy of the Office of Science and Technology Policy is to make available to the public as much information concerning its activities as is possible, consistent with its responsibility to protect the national security. Information may not be classified unless its disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics Research
Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), for the period ended
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    By: /s/ David Keleher
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    David Keleher
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                    August 13, 2002
#### § 21.410 Must a DoD Component have statutory authority to make an assistance award?

Yes, the use of an assistance instrument to carry out a program requires authorizing legislation. That is unlike the use of a procurement contract, for which Federal agencies have inherent, Constitutional authority.
§ 2002.54 Misuse of CUI. ( a ) The CUI SAO must establish agency processes and criteria for reporting and investigating misuse of CUI.
( b ) The CUI EA reports findings on any incident involving misuse of CUI to the offending agency's CUI SAO or CUI Program manager for action, as appropriate.
Public Notice 

2012 Proposed Rules 

The West Virginia Division of Air Quality has scheduled a public hearing on July 11, 2011 for 

its 2012 proposed legislative rules, which will take place at the Division of Environmental 

Protection’s Charleston headquarters, 601 57th Street S.E., Charleston, WV 25304. Oral and 

written comments will be limited to the proposed revisions and will be made a part of the 

rulemaking record. Copies of the rules are available from the Secretary of State’s office or from 

the DEP at http://www.dep.wv.gov/pio/Pages/Rules.aspx. You may also obtain hard copies of the 

information by calling the phone number listed below. 

Written comments may be submitted to the Public Information Office at the above address. 

Comments may also be e-mailed to dep.comments@wv.gov. The hearing dates, locations and 

comment deadlines are as follows: 

Division of Air Quality 

45CSR8 – Ambient Air Quality Standards 

45CSR14 – Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationary Sources of Air 

Pollution for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

45CSR16 – Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources 

45CSR18 - Control of Air Pollution from Combustion of Solid Waste 

45CSR19 – Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationary Sources of Air 

Pollution Which Cause or Contribute to Nonattainment 

45CSR25 – Control of Air Pollution from Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal 

Facilities 

45CSR30 – Requirements for Operating Permits 

45CSR34 – Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

45CSR35 – Requirements for Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to Applicable 

Air Quality Implementation Plans (General Conformity) 

45CSR42 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Program 

The public hearing for all air quality rules will take place beginning at 6 p.m. on July 11, 2011 in 

the Dolly Sods Conference Room. The comment period will begin on June 10, 2011 and end at 

the conclusion of the public hearing on July 11, 2011. Upon authorization and promulgation of 

revisions to 45CSR8, 45CSR14, 45CSR19 and 45CSR35, the DAQ will submit the rules to the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as revisions to the State Implementation Plan pursuant to 

the federal Clean Air Act. Upon authorization and promulgation of revisions to 45CSR18, the 

DAQ will submit the final rule to the U.S. EPA for approval as a part of West Virginia’s Section 

111(d)/129 Plan and program delegation of the federal New Source Performance Standards. 

Rules 45CSR16, 45CSR25 and 45CSR34 will be submitted to EPA to fulfill other federal 

obligations under the Clean Air Act, including delegations, plans and program approvals. Upon 

authorization and promulgation of 45CSR30, the rule will be submitted to the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency as a revision to the State’s Operating Permit Program under 

Title V of the federal Clean Air Act. Rule 45CSR42 is proposed to be repealed. 

For more information on any of the DAQ rules call 304-926-0475.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1119 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6929) to appropriate funds 

for the Affordable Connectivity Program of the Federal Communications 

Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2024 

Ms. CLARKE of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6929) to appropriate funds for the Affordable Connectivity Program 

of the Federal Communications Commission. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution, the House shall proceed to the consideration in 

3 the House of the bill (H.R. 6929) to appropriate funds 

4 for the Affordable Connectivity Program of the Federal 

5 Communications Commission. All points of order against 

6 consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be con7 sidered as read. All points of order against provisions in 

8 the bill are waived. The previous question shall be consid9 ered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1119 IH 

1 to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 

2 hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair 

3 and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appro4 priations or their respective designees; and (2) one motion 

5 to recommit. 

6 SEC. 2. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to 

7 the consideration of H.R. 6929. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         NAME                                           STATE OF INCORPORATION
         ----                                           ----------------------
<S>                                                     <C>
American Casino Enterprises, Inc.                             Nevada

American Care Group, Inc.                                     Nevada

Diversy Enterprises, Inc.                                     Nevada

F.A.S.T., Inc.                                                Nevada

Fowler Card Club, Inc.                                        Nevada

G&L Acquisition Corp.                                         Nevada

Las Vegas Ad-Ventures                                         Nevada

Nevada Publishing, Inc.                                       Nevada

Millerton Games, Inc.                                         California

Motel Development, Inc.                                       Nevada

Reservation Connection, Inc.                                  Nevada

Royal Reservation, Inc.                                       Nevada

Trinidad Management, Inc.                                     Nevada

Mondel, Inc.                                                  Nevada

Sitka Restaurant Group, Inc.(1)                               Nevada

Vantage Bay Group, Inc.                                       Nevada
</TABLE>


--------

(1)   Sitka Restaurant Group, Inc. is a subsidiary of Mondel, Inc., which is
      wholly owned by the Registrant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,590
<INVENTORY>                                      2,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,586
<PP&E>                                         860,538
<DEPRECIATION>                                 445,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 487,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,748
<BONDS>                                         86,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       118,442
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   487,809
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               208,909
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,264
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,335
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,335
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 264.2 Scope.

This part applies to the activities of all Department of Defense personnel involved in the international interchange for defense purposes of patent rights and technical information. The policy prescribed herein applies to unclassified as well as classified information, owned by the United States Government or privately owned, but does not apply to patents, patent applications, and technical information in the field of atomic energy.
#### Albert S. Kleckner, Doing Business as A. S. K. Collection Service, Appellant, v. Julius Levine, Respondent.

In an action against an attorney for an accounting and incidental relief, in which defendant has interposed a counterclaim for an accounting, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 21, 1960, which denied his motion for summary judgment and conditionally granted defendant’s cross motion to preclude the plaintiff from offering evidence upon the trial as to the matters alleged in the complaint, by reason of plaintiff’s failure to furnish a bill of particulars pursuant to a demand. Order modified: (1) by striking out its first decretal paragraph denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment; (2) by substituting therefor a provision granting such motion to the extent of directing summary judgment in favor of plaintiff for an accounting only; (3) by striking out the second decretal paragraph granting defendant’s cross motion to preclude; and (4) by substituting therefor a provision denying such motion. As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. Where an attorney collects money and retains it, he is bound to render an account thereof to the client when called upon to do so *(Matter of Ernst,*54 App. Div. 363). In advance of such account, the client is not required to furnish a bill of particulars *(Moore*v. *Reinhardt,*132 App. Div. 707). Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,320,964
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,412,073
<PP&E>                                         271,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                 237,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,471,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20,395
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,632,998
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,083,225)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,471,785
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               88,765
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               118,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (29,747)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (29,747)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)



</TABLE>
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of R.H. Donnelley
Corporation as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial OfficerAugust 4, 2009
    
    August 4, 2009
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Sasol Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending
30 June 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our
knowledge:



Date: 6 October 2008By:

/s/ LAWRENCE PATRICK ADRIAN DAVIESLawrence Patrick Adrian Davies
Chief executiveDate: 6 October 2008By:

/s/ KANDIMATHIE CHRISTINE RAMONKandimathie Christine Ramon
Chief Financial officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Sasol Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even if the document with which it is
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.

---



QuickLinks
### §2109. Air traffic controller; Secretary

For the purpose of this title—

(1) "air traffic controller" or "controller" means a civilian employee of the Department of Transportation or the Department of Defense who, in an air traffic control facility or flight service station facility—

(A) is actively engaged—

(i) in the separation and control of air traffic; or

(ii) in providing preflight, inflight, or airport advisory service to aircraft operators; or

(B) is the immediate supervisor of any employee described in subparagraph (A); and

(2) "Secretary", when used in connection with "air traffic controller" or "controller", means the Secretary of Transportation with respect to controllers in the Department of Transportation, and the Secretary of Defense with respect to controllers in the Department of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 92–297, §1(a), May 16, 1972, 86 Stat. 141; amended Pub. L. 96–347, §1(a), Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1150; Pub. L. 99–335, title II, §207(b), June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 594.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Par. (1). Pub. L. 99–335 amended par. (1) generally including within term "air traffic controller" or "controller" references to a flight service station facility and to employment providing preflight, inflight, or airport advisory service to aircraft operators and striking out provision that regulations prescribed by the Secretary be used in determining who is an air traffic controller.

1980—Pub. L. 96–347 substituted "controller; Secretary" for "controller" in section catchline, and in text included employees of the Department of Defense within the meaning of air traffic controller or controller and defined "Secretary" to mean Secretary of Transportation with respect to controllers in the Department of Transportation and Secretary of Defense with respect to controllers in the Department of Defense.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–335 effective Jan. 1, 1987, see section 702(a) of Pub. L. 99–335, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8401 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Pub. L. 96–347, §3, Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1151, provided that: "This Act [amending this section and sections 3307, 3381 to 3385, and 8335 of this title and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 8335 of this title] shall take effect on the later of—

"(1) October 1, 1980, or

"(2) the ninetieth day after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 12, 1980]."

#### Effective Date

Section effective on 90th day after May 16, 1972, see, section 10 of Pub. L. 92–297, set out as a note under section 3381 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER V—SALE OF UNCERTIFIED SEED OF PROTECTED VARIETY