TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR 2002 MANE-VU 

SIP MODELING INVENTORIES, VERSION 3 

Prepared by 

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 

3622 Lyckan Parkway, Suite 2005 

Durham, NC 27707 

November 20, 2006 

for the

Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) 
[This page intentionally left blank.]
iii 

CONTENTS 

TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ vi 

FIGURES.....................................................................................................................................viii 

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................... ix 

CHAPTER I – INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1 

A. What is the purpose of this TSD? ....................................................................................... 1 

B. What are Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU Inventory?.................................... 2 

C. How is this TSD organized? ............................................................................................... 3 

CHAPTER II – POINT SOURCES................................................................................................ 4 

A. General Methods for all State and Local Agencies ............................................................ 4 

1. What Data Sources Were Used? ................................................................................... 4 

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? ........................................................ 5 

3. Version 3 Emissions Summary................................................................................... 18 

B. State-Specific Methods ..................................................................................................... 20 

1. Connecticut ................................................................................................................. 20 

2. Delaware ..................................................................................................................... 21 

3. District of Columbia ................................................................................................... 21 

4. Maine .......................................................................................................................... 22 

5. Maryland..................................................................................................................... 22 

6. Massachusetts ............................................................................................................. 23 

7. New Hampshire .......................................................................................................... 23 

8. New Jersey.................................................................................................................. 24 

9. New York.................................................................................................................... 24 

10. Pennsylvania (State, Excluding Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties) .................... 25 

11. Pennsylvania (Allegheny County, FIPS code 42003)................................................. 27 

12. Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County, FIPS code 42101) ............................................. 28

13. Rhode Island ............................................................................................................... 28 

14. Vermont ...................................................................................................................... 30 

C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? .................................................. 30 

CHAPTER III – AREA SOURCES ............................................................................................. 32 

A. General Methods for all States.......................................................................................... 32 

1. What Data Sources Were Used? ................................................................................. 32 

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? ...................................................... 34 

3. Version 3 Revisions .................................................................................................... 53 

4. Version 3 Emissions Summary................................................................................... 57 

B. State-Specific Methods ....................................................................................................... 58 

1. Connecticut ................................................................................................................. 58 

2. Delaware ..................................................................................................................... 59 

3. District of Columbia ................................................................................................... 60 

4. Maine .......................................................................................................................... 60 

5. Maryland..................................................................................................................... 61 

6. Massachusetts ............................................................................................................. 62 

7. New Hampshire .......................................................................................................... 63 

8. New Jersey.................................................................................................................. 65 

9. New York.................................................................................................................... 65 

10. Pennsylvania ............................................................................................................... 70 

11. Rhode Island ............................................................................................................... 71 
iv 

12. Vermont ...................................................................................................................... 72 

C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? .................................................. 73 

CHAPTER IV – NONROAD SOURCES .................................................................................... 75 

A. General Methods for all States.......................................................................................... 75 

1. What Data Sources Were Used? ................................................................................. 75 

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? ...................................................... 79 

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries.................................................................................. 82 

B. State-Specific Methods ..................................................................................................... 84 

1. Connecticut ................................................................................................................. 84 

2. Delaware ..................................................................................................................... 84 

3. District of Columbia ................................................................................................... 85 

4. Maine .......................................................................................................................... 86 

5. Maryland..................................................................................................................... 87 

6. Massachusetts ............................................................................................................. 88 

7. New Hampshire .......................................................................................................... 89 

8. New Jersey.................................................................................................................. 89 

9. New York.................................................................................................................... 90 

10. Pennsylvania ............................................................................................................... 91 

11. Rhode Island ............................................................................................................... 92 

12. Vermont ...................................................................................................................... 93 

CHAPTER V – ONROAD SOURCES ........................................................................................ 94 

A. General Methods for All States......................................................................................... 94 

1. Data Sources ............................................................................................................... 94 

2. What Quality Assurance Steps were Performed? ....................................................... 95 

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries.................................................................................. 96 

B. State-Specific Methods ....................................................................................................... 97 

1. Connecticut ................................................................................................................. 97 

2. Delaware ..................................................................................................................... 99 

3. District of Columbia ................................................................................................. 100 

4. Maine ........................................................................................................................ 102 

5. Maryland................................................................................................................... 103 

6. Massachusetts ........................................................................................................... 105 

7. New Hampshire ........................................................................................................ 106 

8. New Jersey................................................................................................................ 108 

9. New York.................................................................................................................. 110 

10. Pennsylvania ............................................................................................................. 111 

11. Rhode Island ............................................................................................................. 113 

12. Vermont .................................................................................................................... 114 

CHAPTER VI – BIOGENIC SOURCES................................................................................... 117 

A. General Methods for all States........................................................................................ 117 

1. What Data Sources Were Used? ............................................................................... 117 

2. Version 3 Emissions Summary................................................................................. 118 

B. State-Specific Methods ................................................................................................... 118 

CHAPTER VII. TEMPORAL, SPECIATION, AND SPATIAL ALLOCATION PROFILES 

AND PREPARATION OF SMOKE (IDA) AND RPO DATA EXCHANGE 

PROTOCOL (NIF 3.0) FORMATS ............................................................................... 119 

A. Temporal Profiles............................................................................................................ 119 

1. Point and Area Sources............................................................................................. 119 
v 

2. Nonroad Sources....................................................................................................... 120 

3. Onroad Sources......................................................................................................... 120 

B. Speciation Profiles .......................................................................................................... 121 

1. Point and Area Sources............................................................................................. 121 

2. Nonroad Sources....................................................................................................... 121 

3. Onroad Sources......................................................................................................... 121 

C. Spatial Allocation Profiles .............................................................................................. 122 

D. Preparation of SMOKE (IDA) and RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0) Formats .. 122 

CHAPTER VIII. METHODS FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE MANE-VU REGION ..... 155 

CHAPTER IX. REFERENCES ........................................................................................... 157 

APPENDIX A - POINT SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, 

EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT....................................................................A-1 

APPENDIX B - AREA SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, 

EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT....................................................................B-1 

APPENDIX C - NONROAD SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: FINAL COUNTY, 

MONTHLY NATIONAL MOBILE INVENTORY MODEL (NMIM) INPUTS TEMPORAL 

PROFILES FOR POINT AND AREA SOURCES....................................................................C-1 
vi 

TABLES 

Table II-1. Description of the Field Names and Descriptions for the SCC Control Device 

Ratios Table ...................................................................................................................... 14 

Table II-2. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Point Source Emissions by State.................................. 19 

Table II-3. Connecticut 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 20 

Table II-4. Delaware 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission 

Types................................................................................................................................. 21 

Table II-5. District of Columbia 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Type .................................................................................................................. 21 

Table II-6. Maine 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission 

Types................................................................................................................................. 22 

Table II-7. Maryland 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission 

Types................................................................................................................................. 22 

Table II-8. Massachusetts 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 23 

Table II-9. New Hampshire 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 23 

Table II-10. New Jersey 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 24 

Table II-11. New York 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Type .................................................................................................................. 25 

Table II-12. Pennsylvania 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 26 

Table II-13. Pennsylvania - Allegheny County 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, 

End Date, and Emission Types ......................................................................................... 27 

Table II-14. Pennsylvania - Philadelphia County 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start 

Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................ 28 

Table II-15. Rhode Island 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 30 

Table II-16. Vermont 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission 

Types................................................................................................................................. 30 

Table III-1. Summary of MANE-VU-Sponsored Inventories Included in Version 1 of the Area 

Source Consolidated Emissions Inventory ....................................................................... 41 

Table III-2. Area Source Industrial, Commercial/Institutional, and Residential Fossil Fuel 

Combustion Uncontrolled Emission Factors for PM10-PRI/FIL, PM25-PRI/FIL, and 

PM-CON........................................................................................................................... 44 

Table III-3. SCCs for which PM25-PRI Emissions were Estimated by Applying a Ratio to the 

PM10-PRI Emissions in the State inventory .................................................................... 49 

Table III-4. Revisions to PM25-PRI and PM25-FIL Emissions for Paved and Unpaved Roads 

and Construction ............................................................................................................... 56 

Table III-5. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Area Source Emissions by State ................................. 57

Table III-6. Connecticut 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 58 

Table III-7. Delaware 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission 

Types................................................................................................................................. 59 
vii 

Table III-8. District of Columbia 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, 

and Emission Types .......................................................................................................... 60 

Table III-9. Maine 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission 

Types................................................................................................................................. 60 

Table III-10. Maryland 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 61 

Table III-11. Massachusetts 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 62 

Table III-12. New Hampshire 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 64 

Table III-13. New Jersey 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 65 

Table III-14. New York 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 66 

Table III-15. Summary of New York's Revisions to Version 3 of MANE-VU's Area Source 

Inventory........................................................................................................................... 68 

Table III-16. Pennsylvania 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 70 

Table III-17. Rhode Island 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and 

Emission Types................................................................................................................. 71 

Table III-18. Vermont 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission 

Types................................................................................................................................. 72 

Table IV-1. List of Unique Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive SCCs Reported by 

States in MANE-VU Inventory ........................................................................................ 76 

Table IV-2. Summary of Basis for 2002 MANE-VU Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and 

Locomotive Inventory....................................................................................................... 77 

Table IV-3. Data Source Code Descriptions................................................................................ 82 

Table IV-4. Annual 2002 Nonroad Sector Emissions by MANE-VU State................................ 82 

Table IV-5. Annual 2002 NONROAD2005 Model Emissions by MANE-VU State ................. 83 

Table IV-6. Annual 2002 Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive Emissions by 

MANE-VU State............................................................................................................... 83 

Table IV-7. Delaware NONROAD External Data Files............................................................... 85 

Table IV-8. Maryland NONROAD External Data Files ............................................................. 87 

Table V-1. Annual 2002 Onroad Sector Emissions by MANE-VU State................................... 97 

Table V-2. Connecticut Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files..................................................... 98 

Table V-3. Delaware Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files....................................................... 100 

Table V-4. District of Columbia Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ..................................... 101 

Table V-5. Maine Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ............................................................ 102 

Table V-6. Maryland Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files....................................................... 104 

Table V-7. Massachusetts Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ............................................... 105 

Table V-8. New Hampshire Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ............................................ 107 

Table V-9. New Jersey Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files.................................................... 108 

Table V-10. New York Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................................... 110 

Table V-11. Pennsylvania Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files............................................... 112 

Table V-12. Rhode Island Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ............................................... 113 

Table V-13. Vermont Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ...................................................... 115 

Table VI-1. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Biogenic Source Emissions by State ........................ 118 
viii 

Table VII-1. Profiles, Cross-references, and Documentation for Model Inputs for Version 3 of 

2002 MANE-VU Inventory ............................................................................................ 123 

Table VII-2. Point Source Temporal Cross-reference Additions .............................................. 126 

Table VII-3. Unknown SCCs in the MANE-VU Point Source Inventory.................................. 130 

Table VII-4. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference Updates ................................................ 131 

Table VII-5. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference Additions.............................................. 136 

Table VII-6. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference and Profile Additions for the MANE-VU 

Inventory......................................................................................................................... 141 

Table VII-7. Point Source Speciation Profiles Added to Speciation Cross-reference File for CBIV with PM Mechanism.................................................................................................. 151 

Table VII-8. Point Source SCCs Lacking Speciation Profile Assignments for CB-IV with PM 

Mechanism...................................................................................................................... 152 

Table VII-9. Summary of Version 3 Mass Emissions and SMOKE Input Files ....................... 153 

Table VII-10. Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type Combinations for Daily 

Emissions in the MANE-VU 2002 Point and Area Source Inventories, Version 3 ....... 154 

Table VIII-1. Description of Non-MANE-VU Region Inventory Data Used for MANE-VU 

BaseB Modeling.............................................................................................................. 156 

Table C-1. MANE-VU County, Monthly NMIM/NONROAD Inputs...................................... C-2 

FIGURES 

Figure 1. MANE-VU 12-Kilometer CMAQ Modeling Domain ................................................... 2 

Figure VIII-1. MANE-VU 12-Kilometer CMAQ Modeling Domain........................................ 155 
ix 

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

ATP Anaerobic Thermal Processor 

BEIS Biogenic Emissions Inventory System 

CAA Clean Air Act 

CAIR Clean Air Interstate Rule 

CAMD Clean Air Markets Division 

CAP criteria air pollutant 

CE Control Equipment (NIF 3.0) table 

CEM Continuous Emissions Monitoring 

CENRAP Central Regional Air Planning Organization 

CERR Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule 

CMU Carnegie Mellon University 

CNG compressed natural gas 

CO carbon monoxide 

CO2 carbon dioxide 

EF emission factor

EFIG Emission Factors and Inventory Group 

EGU electricity generating unit 

EI inventory 

EM Emission (NIF 3.0) table 

EP Emission Process (NIF 3.0) table 

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

ERP Emission Release Point (NIF 3.0) table 

ETBE ethyl tertiary butyl ether 

ETOH ethanol 

ETS Emission Tracking System 

EU Emission Unit (NIF 3.0) table 

FIPS Federal Information Processing Standard 

FIRE Factor Information and REtrieval Factor 

GIS geographic information system 

GSE ground support equipment 

HAP hazardous air pollutant 

HC hydrocarbon 

HPMS Highway Performance Monitoring System 

ID identification 

IDA Inventory Data Analyzer format 

I/M inspection and maintenance 

km kilometer 

LAI leaf area indices 

LEV low emission vehicle 

LPG liquified petroleum gas 

MACT maximum achievable control technology 

MANE-VU Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union 

MARAMA Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association 

MTBE methyl tertiary butyl ether 

NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

NAICS North American Industrial Classification System 
x 

NEI National Emissions Inventory 

NH3 ammonia 

NIF NEI Input Format 

NMIM National Mobile Inventory Model 

NO nitrous oxide 

NOx oxides of nitrogen 

NYSDEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 

ORIS Office of Regulatory Information Systems 

OTC Ozone Transport Commission 

PAR photosynthetic active radiation 

PE Emission Period (NIF 3.0) table 

Pechan E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 

PFC portable fuel container 

PM particulate matter 

PM-CON condensible PM 

PM10 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a 

nominal 10 micrometers 

PM10-FIL filterable PM10 

PM10-PRI primary PM10

PM2.5 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a 

 nominal 2.5 micrometers 

PM25-FIL filterable PM2.5 

PM25-PRI primary PM2.5

POTWs public owned treatment works 

ppm parts per million 

psi pounds per square inch 

QA quality assurance 

QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan 

RPO Regional Planning Organization 

RVP Reid vapor pressure 

SCC Source Classification Code 

SPDPRO speed profile 

SPDREF speed cross reference 

SI Site (NIF 3.0) table 

SIC Standard Industrial Classification 

SIP State Implementation Plan 

S/L State and Local 

SMOKE Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions 

SO2 sulfur dioxide 

TAME tertiary amyl methyl ether 

TR Transmittal (NIF 3.0) table 

TSD technical support document 

U.S. United States 

VISTAS Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast 

VMT vehicle miles traveled 

VOC volatile organic compound 

WRAP Western Regional Air Partnership 
 1 

CHAPTER I – INTRODUCTION 

A. What is the purpose of this TSD? 

This technical support document (TSD) explains the data sources, methods, and results for 

preparing Version 3 of the 2002 base year criteria air pollutant (CAP) and ammonia (NH3) 

emissions inventories for point, area, onroad, nonroad, and biogenic sources for the MidAtlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) Regional Planning Organization (RPO). The 

MANE-VU region includes Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, 

Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and 

Vermont. Local air planning agencies include Philadelphia and Allegheny County, 

Pennsylvania. The region also includes the Penobscot Tribe of Maine Indian Nation (Tribal code 

018) and the St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians of New York (Tribal code 007). However, 

these tribal authorities did not provide any data for the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. MANE-VU 

will use these inventories to support air quality modeling, State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

development, and implementation activities for the regional haze rule and fine particulate matter 

(PM) and ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). 

The inventories and supporting data prepared include the following: 

(1) Comprehensive, county-level, mass emissions and modeling inventories for of 2002 

emissions for CAPs and NH3 for the State and Local (S/L) agencies included in the 

MANE-VU region; 

(2) The temporal, speciation, and spatial allocation profiles for the MANE-VU region 

inventories; 

(3) Inventories for wildfires, prescribed burning, and agricultural field burning for the 

southeastern provinces of Canada; and 

(4) Inventories for other RPOs, Canada, and Mexico. 

The mass emissions inventory files were prepared in the National Emissions Inventory (NEI) 

Input Format Version 3.0 (NIF 3.0). The modeling inventory files were prepared in Sparse 

Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions/Inventory Data Analyzer (SMOKE/IDA) format. Ancillary 

files (holding spatial, temporal, and speciation profile data) were prepared in SMOKE/IDA 

compatible format. Figure 1 shows the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling 

System (CMAQ) modeling domain for the MANE-VU region. 

The inventories include annual emissions for sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), 

volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), NH3, and particles with an 

aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 and 2.5 micrometers (i.e., primary PM10

and PM2.5). The inventories included summer day, winter day, and average day emissions. 

However, not all agencies included daily emissions in their inventories, and, for the agencies that 

did, the temporal basis for the daily emissions varied between agencies. The temporal profiles 

prepared for this project will be used to calculate daily emissions when not available in the 

inventory files. 
 2 

Figure 1. MANE-VU 12-Kilometer CMAQ Modeling Domain 

B. What are Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU Inventory? 

Work on Version 1 of the 2002 MANE-VU inventory began in April 2004. The consolidated 

inventory for point, area, onroad, and nonroad sources was prepared by starting with the 

inventories that S/L agencies submitted to the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) from May through July of 2004 as a requirement of the Consolidated Emissions 

Reporting Rule (CERR). The EPA’s format and content quality assurance (QA) programs (and 

other QA checks not included in EPA’s QA software) were run on each inventory to identify 

format and/or data content issues (EPA, 2004a). E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. (Pechan) 

worked with the MANE-VU S/L agencies and the staff of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Air 

Management Association (MARAMA) to resolve QA issues and augment the inventories to fill 

data gaps in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) prepared for this 

project (MANE-VU, 2004a). MARAMA is the MANE-VU organization’s employees, whereas 
 3 

MANE-VU is the member S/L agencies plus MARAMA employees. MARAMA is one of three 

RPOs (in addition to Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) and North East States for Coordinated 

Air Use Management) supporting the MANE-VU effort. 

A draft of the point and area source inventories and summary files were provided for stakeholder 

review during August 2004. Stakeholder comments were reviewed by the S/L agencies and 

revisions to the inventory files were made to the files to incorporate stakeholder comments as 

approved by each S/L agency. The inventories were finalized during December 2004 and the 

SMOKE input files were prepared and reviewed by the modelers during December 2004 and 

early January 2005. The final inventory and SMOKE input files were finalized during January 

2005. 

Work on Version 2 (covering the period from April through September 2005) involved 

incorporating revisions requested by some S/L agencies on the point, area, and onroad 

inventories. Work on Version 3 (covering the period from December 2005 through April 2006) 

included additional revisions to the point, area, and onroad inventories as requested by some 

states. Thus, the Version 3 inventory for point, area, and onroad sources were built upon 

Versions 1 and 2. This work also included development of the biogenics inventory. Version 3 

of the nonroad inventory was completely redone due to changes that EPA made to the 

NONROAD2005 model. 

C. How is this TSD organized? 

Chapters II through V of this TSD present the general and State-specific methods and data 

sources used to develop Version 3 of MANE-VU’s 2002 inventory for point, area, nonroad, and 

onroad sources. Chapter VI presents the methods, data sources, and model used to develop the 

biogenics inventory. Chapter VII documents the temporal allocation, speciation, and spatial 

allocation modeling input files used for Version 3 of MANE-VU’s 2002 inventory for all sectors. 

Chapter VIII describes the non-MANE-VU region inventory data used for MANE-VU BaseB 

Modeling. References for the TSD are provided in Chapter IX. Appendices A and B provide the 

QA Summary Report files prepared during development of the State-specific inventories for 

point and area sources, respectively. Appendices A and B also provide tables that identify for 

each S/L agency, the Version 3 data sources, emission type period, pollutant, and the number of 

counties by source classification code (SCC). For the nonroad inventory, Appendix C provides 

the final county, monthly National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) inputs provided or 

confirmed by the States for Reid vapor pressure (RVP), weight percent oxygen, and gasoline 

sulfur. 
 4 

CHAPTER II – POINT SOURCES 

A. General Methods for all State and Local Agencies

 

1. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Version 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU point source inventory is based primarily on Version 1 with 

some state-specific revisions incorporated into Versions 2 and 3. Version 1 was developed using 

the inventories that S/L agencies submitted to EPA from May through July of 2004 as a 

requirement of the CERR. All 12 State agencies submitted point source inventories to EPA. In 

addition, Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties in Pennsylvania each submitted their own point 

source inventories to EPA. The EPA performed some limited QA review of the S/L inventories 

to identify format, referential integrity, and duplicate record issues. The EPA revised the 

inventories to address these issues and made the files available to the S/L agencies on August 6, 

2004. These inventory files were used as the starting point for Version 1 of the MANE-VU 

inventory. These inventory files were obtained from EPA, consolidated into a single data set, 

subjected to extensive QA review, revised (as approved by the MANE-VU S/L agencies) to 

address QA issues and to fill data gaps identified while preparing Version 1. Subsequently, the 

following agencies provided revisions to their point source inventories: 

• Version 2 – Connecticut, Delaware, and Maryland 

• Version 3 – Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island 

The revisions that these states provided for Versions 2 and 3 are discussed in the “State-Specific 

Methods” section of this chapter. 

In order to track the origin of data, the temporal period of emissions, and to facilitate generation 

of emission summaries, the following NIF plus fields were added to the Transmittal (TR), Site 

(SI), Emission Unit (EU), Emission Release Point (ER), Emission Process (EP), Emission Period 

(PE), Emission (EM), and Control Equipment (CE) tables: 

• Data Source Codes: 

Code Description

S State agency-supplied data. 

L Local agency-supplied data to incorporate S/L comments for individual 

records. 

P NH3 emissions from MANE-VU inventory for cement kilns.

AUG-A PM Augmentation: ad-hoc change. 

AUG-C PM Augmentation: standard augmentation method. 

AUG-O PM Augmentation: set PMxx-FIL = PMxx-PRI for SCCs starting with 

10 (external fuel combustion) and 20 (internal fuel combustion). Note: 

emission factors and particle-size data for estimating condensible 

emissions for fuel combustion SCCs starting with 30 were not available; 

therefore, condensible emissions were not estimated for these processes 
 5 

if an agency provided filterable and not primary emissions for these 

processes. In other words, the primary emissions were assumed to equal 

the filterable emissions. 

AUG-Z PM Augmentation: automated fill-in of zero values where all PM for a 

particular process is zero. 

• Revision Date: This field indicates the month and year during which the last revision 

was made to a record. 

• State Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS): This field indicates the state 

FIPS code of the submittal. 

• County FIPS: This field indicates the county FIPS code of the submittal. 

The following NIF plus fields were added to the EM table: 

• Emission Ton Value: This field indicates the values of the emissions in tons. This 

field was used to prepare summaries of emissions on a consistent EU basis. 

• Emission Type Period: This field indicates the period of the Emission Type – either 

ANNUAL or NONANNUAL. This field was used to prepare summaries of annual 

emissions. 

• CAP_HAP: This field identifies records for CAP versus records for hazardous air 

pollutants (HAPs). For the MANE-VU inventory, the flag is CAP for all records. 

• Year: This field indicates the year of the data; for this inventory, it is 2002. 

Note that the QAPP for Version 1 includes more data source codes than were used in Version 3 

of the point source inventory. The data source codes listed above are the codes used in 

Version 3. The exception is for Rhode Island, who requested that their Version 2 inventory be 

replaced with its inventory included in the final 2002 NEI prepared by EPA. Thus, for Rhode 

Island, it was agreed to maintain the data source codes used in the NEI in Version 3 of the 

MANE-VU inventory. The data source codes for Rhode Island’s point source inventory are 

explained under the state-specific section for Rhode Island. 

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? 

A QAPP was prepared and approved by MANE-VU/MARAMA and the EPA Regional Office 

prior to initiating work on Version 1 of the inventory (MANE-VU, 2004a). This QAPP was 

followed during preparation of all three versions of the inventory. This section provides an 

overview of the QA checks completed on each version of the inventory. The QA process for 

each S/L inventory involved the following steps: 

• Conduct QA checks on each S/L inventory; 

• Prepare a QA Summary Report for submittal to the agency for review; 
 6 

• Revise the inventory to resolve QA issues as directed by the agency; 

• Repeat the QA checks on the revised inventory to verify that the corrections were 

completed; 

• Perform augmentation to correct for missing data; and 

• Repeat the QA checks to verify that the augmentation was completed correctly. 

a. QA checks for S/L agency inventories 

The following discusses the QA diagnoses that were run on the consolidated point source 

inventory data set. For each S/L agency, a “QA Summary Report” was prepared for each QA 

check in an Excel Workbook file. The results of each QA check was summarized in a separate 

spreadsheet and submitted to the S/L agency for review and resolution. The agencies provided 

corrections to the data in the Excel files or via e-mail and the inventory was updated with the 

corrections. 

i. Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM) Analysis 

The goal of this analysis was to compare annual NOx and SO2 emissions that were measured with 

CEM systems and reported to EPA to the annual NOx and SO2 emissions reported in the S/L 

inventories. Facilities report hourly CEM data to EPA for units that are subject to CEM 

reporting requirements of the NOx SIP Call rule and Title IV of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Thus, 

hourly CEM emissions were summed to the annual level and compared to the annual emissions 

in the S/L inventories. If the S/L agencies agreed, the CEM hourly emissions would be used to 

support air quality modeling to accurately reflect the temporal distribution of emissions from 

CEM units during 2002. Since some of the states require facilities to certify the emissions they 

report for inclusion in the inventory, the agencies needed proof that the emissions in the CEM 

inventory compared well with the emissions in the S/L inventory. 

The 2002 CEM inventory containing hourly NOx and SO2 emissions and heat input data were 

downloaded from the EPA/Clean Air Markets Division’s (CAMD) web site 

(www.epa.gov/airmarkets) on July 8, 2004 (CAMD, 2004). The data were provided by quarter 

and state resulting in 48 separate files for the 12 states in the MANE-VU region. For each state, 

the hourly emissions were summed to the annual level by facility and EU. 

The first stage in the CEM analysis involved preparing a crosswalk file to match facilities and 

units in the CEM inventory to facilities and units in the S/L inventories. In the CEM inventory, 

the Office of Regulatory Information Systems (ORIS) identification (ID) code identifies unique 

facilities and the unit ID identifies unique boilers and internal combustion engines (i.e., turbines 

and reciprocating engines). In the S/L inventories, the state and county FIPS and state facility ID 

together identify unique facilities and the EU ID identifies unique boilers or internal combustion 

engines. However, in some of the S/L inventories, the emissions for multiple EUs were summed 

and reported under the same EU ID. Thus, an Excel Workbook was sent to the S/L agencies that 

contained an initial crosswalk with the ORIS ID and unit ID in the CEM inventory matched to 

the state and county FIPS, state facility ID, and EU ID in the S/L inventory. Agencies were 

asked to confirm/correct/supplement the information in the crosswalk. The initial crosswalk also 

contained annual emissions summed from the hourly CEM emissions and flags that indicated if 
 7 

CEM units were subject to reporting requirements under the NOx SIP Call and/or Title IV of the 

CAA. It should be noted that the initial matching of the IDs in both inventories was based on 

previous crosswalks that had been developed for the 1999 NEI and in-house information 

compiled by Pechan. The matching at the facility level was nearly complete; however, S/L 

agency assistance was needed to match most of CEM units to EUs in the S/L inventories. 

The crosswalk was updated with corrections to facility and CEM unit-to-EU matches, and with 

new matches provided by the S/L agencies. The matching of each CEM unit to an EU was still 

incomplete. Consequently, the comparison of annual emissions was performed at the facility 

level. 

The second stage in the CEM analysis was to prepare an Excel Workbook file for each S/L 

agency that compared the annual emissions summed from the hourly CEM inventory to the 

annual emissions reported in the S/L inventory. The file included three spreadsheets that 

compared annual emissions at the facility level, listed the facilities in the CEM inventory that 

could not be matched to the facilities in the S/L inventory, and listed the facilities in the S/L 

inventory identified as an electricity generating unit (EGU) that could not be matched to a 

facility in the CEM inventory. The Excel files were sent to the S/L agencies for review. The S/L 

agencies then indicated if they did or did not want to use the hourly CEM inventory. 

The facility-level comparison of CEM to emission inventory NOx and SO2 emissions found that 

for some facilities, the annual emissions from the S/L inventory exceeded the CEM annual 

emissions because the facility in the S/L inventory contained more than just CEM units. This 

condition was determined to be acceptable. However, S/L agencies were asked to review data 

for facilities where the CEM emissions were higher than the emissions summed from the S/L 

inventory. For these cases, CEM emissions may be higher than those reported in a S/L inventory 

due to methods EPA uses for using artificially high default values to fill in hourly CEM data 

when not reported or when a CEM unit was not working properly. 

After reviewing the comparison of the CEM to S/L inventory emissions, New York and Vermont 

elected to use the 2002 CEM inventory containing hourly NOx and SO2 emissions for all 

facilities. Maryland; New Hampshire; and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania elected to use the 

2002 CEM data for some but not all of the facilities within their jurisdiction. The Excel 

Workbook files containing the comparison of CEM to S/L inventories provides a spreadsheet 

identifying the facilities for which these S/L agencies elected to use the CEM inventory. 

Subsequent to the completion of this analysis, it was determined that the structure of the 

EPA/CAMD file would not be compatible with the format of the SMOKE input file. The 

database structure did not affect the annual emissions summed from the hourly CEM emissions 

used in the comparison to S/L inventory data. For each of the S/L agencies that elected to use 

the 2002 CEM data, CAMD agreed to provide separate database files for each state with a 

structure compatible with the SMOKE input file format. Pechan then used the crosswalk to add 

to the CEM inventory files the state and county FIPS, state facility ID, and EU ID (if the 

crosswalk contains a CEM unit to EU match) to the hourly CEM database files provided by 

CAMD. The modified database was then used to create the SMOKE input files for these states. 
 8 

Note that Delaware requested that the 2002 CEM inventory for its facilities not be used for 

regional haze modeling. However, if the consolidated point source inventory prepared under this 

project is used to support ozone episode modeling, Delaware may consider using the CEM 

hourly data for the episodes modeled. Therefore, the 2002 CEM inventory was also processed 

for Delaware’s facilities. 

ii. PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness Review 

The following consistency checks were performed at the EM table data key level (for annual 

emissions) to compare PM emissions: 

• If a process was associated with a PM emission record, but was missing one or more 

of the following (as appropriate for the SCC [i.e., condensible PM (PM-CON) is 

associated with fuel combustion only]): filterable PM10 (PM10-FIL), primary PM10

(PM10-PRI), filterable PM2.5 (PM25-FIL), primary PM2.5 (PM25-PRI), or PM-CON, 

the record was flagged for review. 

• The following equations were used to determine consistency: 

 PM10-FIL + PM-CON = PM10-PRI 

 PM25-FIL + PM-CON = PM25-PRI 

 PM-FIL + PM-CON = PM-PRI 

• The following comparisons were applied to determine consistency: 

 PM10-PRI >= PM10-FIL 

 PM25-PRI >= PM25-FIL 

 PM10-PRI >= PM-CON 

 PM25-PRI >= PM-CON 

 PM10-FIL >= PM25-FIL 

 PM10-PRI >= PM25-PRI 

 PM-PRI >= PM10-PRI 

 PM-PRI >= PM25-PRI 

 PM-FIL >= PM10-FIL 

 PM-FIL >= PM25-FIL 

If the data failed one of these checks it was diagnosed as an error, summarized in an Excel 

Workbook file, and provided to the S/L agency for corrections. If a S/L agency did not provide 

corrections to these errors, the errors were corrected or filled in according to the augmentation 

procedures. 
 9 

iii. ERP Coordinate Review 

Location coordinates for point sources were evaluated using geographic information system 

(GIS) mapping to determine if the coordinates were within 0.5-kilometers of the boundary of the 

county in which the source was located. If not, the S/L agency was asked to review the 

coordinates and provide corrections to either the coordinates or the state and county FIPS codes. 

The 0.5-kilometer test resulted in a large number of ERPs for review by the agencies. Therefore, 

to assist S/L agencies in prioritizing their review of coordinates, ERP records with coordinates 

located more than 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 or more kilometers from their county boundary, and 

coordinates that mapped outside of their state boundary were identified. Annual emissions 

summed to the ERP level were included in the QA Summary Report to identify records with zero 

emissions for all pollutants and to identify the highest emitting stacks. The QA Summary Report 

was provided to the S/L agency for review and corrections. 

iv. ERP Parameter Review 

The EPA’s QA guidance for diagnosing ERP issues for the point source NEI (EPA, 2004b) was 

applied to identify QA issues in the S/L point source inventories. The QA guidance involved 

diagnosing the correct assignment of the ERP type (i.e., stack or fugitive), parameters with zero 

values, parameters not within the range of values specified in the EPA’s QA procedures, and 

consistency checks (i.e., comparing calculated values against the values reported in the 

inventory). In many cases errors were caused by missing or zero values. In other cases, out-ofrange errors were caused by unit conversion issues (e.g., stack parameters were in ft, ft/sec, cu 

ft/sec, or degrees Fahrenheit). The QA issues were summarized in a separate QA Summary 

Report for each agency and each agency was asked to provide corrections. If an agency did not 

provide corrections for out-of-range or missing values, the data were corrected or filled in 

according to the ERP augmentation procedures. 

v. Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data Review 

The CE codes in the “Primary Device Type Code” and “Secondary Device Type Code” fields 

were reviewed to identify invalid codes (i.e., codes that did not exist in the NIF 3.0 reference 

table) and missing codes (e.g., records with a null or uncontrolled code of 000 but with control 

efficiency data). 

QA review of control efficiency data involved diagnosis of two types of errors. First, records 

were reviewed to identify control efficiency values that were reported as a decimal rather than as 

a percent value. Records with control efficiencies with decimal values were flagged as a 

potential error (although not necessarily an error, since the real control efficiency may be less 

than 1%). 

The second check identified records where 100% control was reported in the CE table, but the 

emissions in the EM table were greater than zero and the rule effectiveness value in the EM table 

was null, zero, or 100% (implying 100% control of emissions). Because many agencies did not 

populate the rule effectiveness field or a default value of zero was assigned, records with null or 

zero rule effectiveness values were included where the CE was 100% and emissions were greater 
 10 

than zero. The records that met these criteria were summarized in a QA Summary Report for 

review and correction, if necessary, by the S/L agency. 

vi. Start and End Date Checks 

QA review was conducted to identify start date and end date values in the PE and EM tables to 

confirm consistency with the inventory year in the TR table, and to confirm that the end date 

reported was greater than the start date reported. This check did not identify any QA issues in 

the three versions of the inventory. 

vii. Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison 

The following QA checks were conducted to identify potential errors associated with the 

incorrect reporting of daily and/or annual emissions: 

• Any “DAILY” type record that is greater than its associated “ANNUAL”. 

A review of the daily vs. annual comparison revealed that in many cases, the daily value was 

nonzero (but very small), but the annual value was zero. This was generally a result of rounding 

in a S/L agency’s original emissions database, where annual records were recorded in tons per 

year to a set number of decimal places, while the corresponding daily records were recorded in 

pounds per year to a set number of decimal places. The annual record rounds to zero in the 

original database, while the daily value remains non-zero. A tolerance check reveals the 

following (comparison in tons): 

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> 0 

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .000001 

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .00001 

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .0001 

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .001 

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .01 

For Version 1, the affected S/L agencies were as follows: 

• Connecticut (09) 11 records 

• Maine (23) 4 records 

• Maryland (24) 72 records 

• New Jersey (34) 2935 records 

• Pennsylvania Allegheny County (42003) 17 records 

• Pennsylvania Philadelphia County (42101) 146 records 

• Rhode Island (44) 1 record 

Rhode Island, Philadelphia, and New Jersey responded that the dailies that were greater than the 

annuals could be deleted. Maryland determined that they should be kept since the difference 

values were small. The records for the remaining S/L agencies were kept. This QA issue only 

occurred during processing of Version 1. 
 11 

b. Responses from S/L agencies 

Each S/L agency reviewed its “QA Summary Report” files and the S/L agency provided 

direction for correcting QA issues either in the QA Summary Report Excel files or via e-mail. 

The inventory was then revised to incorporate responses from each agency and the QA checks 

were run again to verify that the QA issues were addressed. If an agency responded to a QA 

issue by e-mail, the direction was recorded in the “QA Summary Report” file. The “QA 

Summary Report” file for each S/L agency was updated to document QA issues and resolution of 

issues associated with developing Versions 2 and 3 of the point source inventory. The “QA 

Summary Report” files for Version 3 are provided with this report in a separate zip file. The 

files in the zip file are organized in separate folders for each S/L agency. Each folder includes a 

separate Excel workbook file for the following QA checks if a QA issue existed: 

• PM Augmentation QA Summary; 

• Stack Parameter QA Summary; 

• Stack Coordinates QA Summary; 

• Stack Parameter and Coordinate Augmentation Summary; 

• CEM Comparisons and Revisions; and 

• Control Device/Efficiency Summary. 

c. Gap Filling and Augmentation 

The following discusses the augmentation procedures that were used to fill in missing data that 

were not supplied by the S/L agencies. The S/L agencies approved the procedures before they 

were applied. These procedures were applied after revising the inventory to address QA issues 

as directed by each S/L agency. 

i. MANE-VU-Sponsored Inventories 

MANE-VU prepared a 2002 NH3 emissions inventory for cement kilns for SCCs 30500606 and 

30500706 located in four MANE-VU states. Maryland chose to add one new facility 

24013/0012 (state and county FIPS code/facility ID). New York chose to add the following 

three sites 36001/4010300016, 36001/4012400001, and 36111/3514800084. Maine and 

Pennsylvania chose not to add emissions from this inventory. The data for Maryland and New 

York were added to Version 1. These data were not changed in Versions 2 and 3 of the point 

source inventory. 

ii. PM Augmentation 

The PM augmentations process gap-fills missing PM pollutant complements. For example, if a 

S/L agency provided only PM10-PRI pollutants the PM augmentation process filled in the 

PM25-PRI pollutants. The steps in the PM augmentation process were as follows: 

• Step 1: Initial QA and remediation of S/L provided PM pollutants; 
 12 

• Step 2: Development of PM factor ratios based on factors from the Factor 

Information and REtrieval (FIRE) Data System, version 6.2, and the PM Calculator 

(EPA, 2003a; EPA, 2004c); 

• Step 3: Implementation of the ratios developed in step 2.; and 

• Step 4: Presentation of PM augmentation results to S/L agencies for review and 

comment. 

An Access database (named Reference Tables for PM Augmentation) accompanies this 

document. This database contains the SCC Control Device Ratio table, the Emission Factors 

table, and Emission Factors Crosstab table discussed in Step 2. The Emission Factors Crosstab 

table contains the ratios developed from the Emission Factors table. The Emission Factors table 

contains detailed information on the emission factors used to develop the ratios. The PM 

Calculator ratio table can be provided upon request – it contains all possible combinations for 

SCC and Control Device types that are available in the PM Calculator. Ratios from the PM 

calculator were developed using a standard input of 100 TONS of uncontrolled PM-FIL 

emissions. 

1. Initial QA and Remediation of PM Pollutants 

S/L agencies were initially presented with files that detailed potential inconsistencies and 

missing information in their PM pollutant inventory. Inconsistencies in PM pollutants include 

the following: 

• PM-PRI less than PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, or PM-CON; 

• PM-FIL less than PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL; 

• PM10-PRI less than PM25-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL or PM-CON; 

• PM10-FIL less than PM25-FIL; 

• PM25-PRI less than PM25-FIL or PM-CON; 

• The sum of PM10-FIL and PM-CON not equal to PM10-PRI; and 

• The sum of PM25-FIL and PM-CON not equal to PM25-PRI. 

Potential missing information was summarized in a table which detailed the variety of cases 

provided by each S/L agency. For example, an S/L agency might have provided PM10-FIL and 

PM25-FIL for some processes, but provided only PM10-FIL for other processes. 

S/L agencies were asked to review this information and provide corrections where possible. In 

general, corrections (or general directions) were provided in the case of the potential 

inconsistency issues. An example of a general direction provided by a S/L agency was to 

remove PM25-FIL where greater than PM10-FIL because the PM10-FIL was (in their particular 

case) known to be more reliable. In other cases, the agency-provided specific process-level 

pollutant corrections. If specific direction was not provided by the agency, zero PM pollutants 

were generally removed, or complements were set equal to the higher number. 
 13 

2. Development of PM Factor Ratio 

The primary deliverable of this step of the process was the development of a table keyed by 

SCC, primary control device, and secondary control device. This table is called the SCC Control 

Device Ratios table (see Table II-1). This table was filled according to the following steps: 

• Ratios (both condensible and noncondensible) were added from FIRE for SCCs 

starting with 10* (external fuel combustion) and 20* (internal fuel combustion) where 

there was a direct match between the provided SCC, and primary and secondary 

control devices. 

• Ratios (non-condensable) were added from the PM Calculator for SCCs starting with 

10* and 20* where there was not a direct match between the provided SCC, and 

primary and secondary control devices. Condensible ratios were added from the PM 

Calculator based on the uncontrolled SCC for these SCCs. In some cases, it was 

necessary to map the SCC and control devices to the PM calculator to find a match 

for the noncondensible ratios. In other cases, it was necessary to map the SCC to 

FIRE to find a match for condensible ratios. 

• For natural gas, process gas, and liquified petroleum gas (LPG) SCCs starting with 

10* and 20*, it was assumed (based on FIRE emission factors) that the PMPRI/PM10-PRI/PM25-PRI ratio was equal to 1. It was also assumed that the PMFIL/PM10- FIL /PM25- FIL was equal to 1. Condensible ratios were calculated from 

uncontrolled FIRE emission factors for these SCCs. In some cases it was necessary 

to map the SCC to FIRE to find a match for condensible ratios. 

• Ratios for SCCs not like 10* and 20* were obtained from the PM Calculator. It was 

assumed that the condensible component was zero. 
 14 

Table II-1. Description of the Field Names and Descriptions for the SCC Control 

Device Ratios Table 

Field Name Field Description 

PM Calculator A “Yes” in this field indicates that at least some of the information was retrieved from the PM 

Calculator 

FIRE A “Yes” in this field indicates that at least some of the information was retrieved from the Emission 

Factors table. A “Condensible Ratios” in this field indicates that the condensible ratios factors were 

retrieved from this table. 

Other A field to indicate other sources as necessary. 

SCC Source category code from the S/L agency-provided data. 

SCC_DESC Description of source category code from the S/L agency-provided data. 

maptoSCC This field equals SCC unless the SCC provided was not found in the appropriate source table. In 

that case, the SCC was mapped using the closest available appropriate mapping choice. 

maptoSCC_DESC Description of the maptoSCC. 

mapSCCNote Any notes related to the mapping of the SCC. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the SCC was 

mapped. 

PD Primary device type from the S/L agency provided data. 

PD_DESC Description of the primary device (PD). 

maptoPD This field equals PD unless the PD provided was not found in the appropriate source table. In that 

case, the PD was mapped using the closest available appropriate mapping choice. 

maptoPD_DESC Description of the maptoPD. 

mapPDNote Any notes related to the mapping of the PD. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the PD was mapped. 

SD Secondary device type from the S/L agency provided data. 

SD_DESC Description of the secondary device (SD). 

maptoSD This field equals SD unless the SD provided was not found in the appropriate source table. In that 

case, the SD was mapped using the closest available appropriate mapping choice. 

maptoSD_DESC Description of the maptoSD. 

mapSDNote Any notes related to the mapping of the SD. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the SD was mapped. 

PM-FIL/PM10-FIL This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the 

PM calculator. 

PM-FIL/PM25-FIL This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the 

PM calculator. 

PM-FIL/PM-PRI This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the 

PM calculator. 

PM-PRI/PM10-PRI This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the 

PM calculator. 

PM-PRI/PM25-PRI This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the 

PM calculator. 

PM10-FIL/PM25-FIL This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the 

PM calculator. 

PM10-PRI/PM25-PRI This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the 

PM calculator. 

PM-CON/PM10-FIL Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios 

were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. 

PM-CON/PM10-PRI Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios 

were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. 

PM-CON/PM25-FIL Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios 

were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. 

PM-CON/PM25-PRI Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios 

were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. 

PM-CON/PM-FIL Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios 

were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. 

PM-CON/PM-PRI Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios 

were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. 

RPO Specific Note Indicates SCC and control device combinations are in the RPO inventory. 

Additional Notes Any notes regarding assumptions about ratios. 
 15 

3. Implementation of the QA Ratios 

In order to calculate the additional PM pollutants based on the SCC Control Device ratio table 

developed in the above step, a crosstab table was created from the EM table based on the 

following fields: 

• State FIPS 

• County FIPS 

• Tribal Code 

• EU ID 

• Process ID 

• Start Date 

• End Date 

• Emission Type 

• SCC 

• Primary Device Type 

• Secondary Device Type 

The primary and secondary device type fields were added based on information from the CE 

table. If CE information was not available these fields were defaulted to 000 

(“UNCONTROLLED”). In the few cases where there was a conflict between the control devices 

reported for the same process for PM pollutants (e.g., a PM10-PRI is listed as controlled, but 

PM-PRI did not have control information), the control device type was selected based on the 

controlled pollutant. 

In addition to the fields listed above, the crosstab included the PM emission amounts for the 

particular process and a field that indicated whether those emissions existed in the inventory. 

These fields were as follows: 

• PM_PRI 

• PM_FIL 

• PM10_PRI 

• PM10_FIL 

• PM25_PRI 

• PM25_FIL 

• PM_CON 

• PM_PRI_EXISTS 

• PM_FIL_EXISTS 

• PM10_PRI_EXISTS 

• PM10_FIL_EXISTS 

• PM25_PRI_EXISTS 

• PM25_FIL_EXISTS 

• PM_CON_EXISTS 
 16 

The emission values were in the PM_PRI, PM_FIL, PM10_PRI, PM10_FIL, PM25_PRI, 

PM25_FIL, PM_CON fields. The _EXISTS field indicated whether the pollutant was provided 

by the S/L agency. A zero indicated that the pollutant was not provided; a number greater than 

zero (usually one) indicates that it was provided by the S/L agency. 

Prior to the development of this crosstab, the EM table was filled in as much as possible using 

basic assumptions. For example, if the S/L agency provided zero emissions for some but not all 

forms of PM for a particular process, it was assumed that all forms of PM for that process were 

zero and they were filled in accordingly. Since that assumption was that for non 10* and 20* 

SCCs, the condensible value was zero – that would lead to PM10-FIL = PM10-PRI and PM25-

FIL = PM25-PRI and PM-FIL = PM-PRI. Given that assumption, values for these pollutants 

were also filled in. After this data insertion, a subset of the crosstab was created. This subset 

only contained processes that required additional augmentation. The SCC Control Device Type 

ratio table was based on only those SCC and control device types that required augmentation. 

The next step was to fill in the missing information in this crosstab using the information found 

in the SCC Control Device Ratio table. 

In calculating PM complement pollutants, priority was given to calculating –PRI and –CON 

pollutants. FIL pollutants were only calculated if necessary to calculate other pollutants or if it 

was a by-product of this calculation. 

In augmenting the PM pollutants, the non 10* and 20* SCCs were augmented first, with order 

given to augmenting based on PM10 where available, PM2.5 where available, and then PM. 

Augmenting the PM pollutants for the 10* and 20* SCCs is more complicated, but the basic 

approach was to augment based on PM10 (FIL or PRI) where available, PM2.5 (FIL or PRI) where 

available, and then PM (FIL or PRI) if PM10 or PM2.5 variations were not available. Where both 

PM10 (FIL or PRI) and PM2.5 (FIL or PRI) variations were both available, the calculation for 

PM-CON was generally driven from the PM10 number and the complements as necessary were 

back calculated. Where a PRI emission factor ratio was required and was not available, the FIL 

emission factor ratio was used. 

After completing the calculations, the data was QA checked to ensure that the calculations 

resulted in consistent values for the PM complement. On a few occasions, the mix of ratio value 

and the pollutants and values provided by the S/L agency resulted in negative values when FIL 

was back-calculated. In this case the negative FIL value was set to zero and the PRI value was 

readjusted. In a few cases the appropriate combination of ratios, SCC, and control efficiencies 

were not available to calculate the PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI values. In these cases, PM10-PRI 

and PM25-PRI were set equal. The resultant PM table information was appended to the EM 

table. 

Note: The augmentation procedures resulted in some high condensible ratios that were 

calculated for some SCC control device type combinations. In most cases, these high 

condensible ratios were the result of the back calculation of PM-CON from PMxx-PRI records. 
 17 

Since the state had already provided the PMxx-PRI records, these PM-CON values were not 

added. 

The data source code field was used to identify records that were added to the inventory to 

complete the set of PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions. 

iii. ERP Coordinates 

If an S/L agency did not provide corrections for ERP coordinates that map more than 5 km 

outside of the county boundary, or provide coordinates for ERP records that did not have any 

coordinates in the S/L inventory, the following procedures were applied to replace the 

coordinates: 

• Coordinates for other ERPs at the same facility, if available, that map within the 

county; 

• Coordinates for the centroid of the zip code for a facility if a valid zip code was 

provided or could be obtained from the agency if it is not valid; or 

• County centroid coordinates. 

The zip code was taken from the SI NIF 3.0 table. The zip code was compared to a reference 

table of valid zip codes to verify that it was an active zip code and existed in the state and county 

reported in the inventory. If a valid zip code for a facility could not be identified, the centroid 

for the facility’s county was used as a last resort. In some cases, the S/L agency provided 

confirmation that the S/L coordinates were correct even if the analysis indicated that the 

coordinates were outside of the county. These coordinates were not changed. Additionally, all 

coordinates were converted to latitude/longitude measurements. 

iv. ERP Parameters 

If valid ERP parameters were not provided by the S/L agency, the ERP augmentation procedures 

that EPA developed for the 2002 point source NEI were applied to the MANE-VU inventory 

(EPA, 2004b). It has been determined that the augmentation procedures in this document 

regarding SCC-specific ERP types and temperatures may be difficult to resolve. When this 

situation occurs, preference was given to the S/L agency -supplied ERP type and SCC. For 

example, the procedures do not account for cases where an EU has two processes with one 

defined as a stack source and the other as a fugitive source. Therefore, the S/L-supplied ERP 

type was used when this situation occurred. If the ERP type was null, and information was not 

available from the S/L agency, the stack height information was used as a guide. If stack height 

information was available, the ERP was treated as a stack, if stack height information was not 

available, the ERP was treated as a fugitive. An additional modification to the augmentation 

procedure was also implemented. Since in many cases null values were filled in with zeros by 

S/L local databases when comparing out-of-range velocities and flows (after it was determined 

that the stack and diameter information was correct) – null and zero values were treated in the 

same manner to prevent inappropriate replacement of stack parameter values. Additionally, 

stack parameter values were rounded to 1 decimal place when comparing with range values (just 
 18 

for the purposes of comparison) to prevent replacement of S/L parameter values based on 

negligible decimal differences. 

v. Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data 

Control efficiencies that were 100% and rule effectiveness of 100% with non-zero emissions 

were diagnosed as potential errors and sent to the S/L agencies. Where possible these data were 

updated with S/L data corrections. Decimal control efficiencies were also diagnosed and sent to 

the S/L agencies. A decimal control efficiency was usually a sign that a control efficiency had 

not been entered as a percentage as is required by NIF 3.0. Where possible these data was 

updated with S/L data corrections. 

c. QA Review of Final Inventory 

 

Final QA checks were run on the revised point source inventory data set to ensure that all 

corrections provided by the S/L agencies were incorporated into the S/L inventories and that 

there were no remaining QA issues that could be addressed during the duration of the project. 

The EPA QA program was run on the inventory and the QA output was reviewed to verify that 

all QA issues that could be addressed were resolved. The QA output file was provided in an 

Access database along with Version 3 of the inventory. 

3. Version 3 Emissions Summary 

Table II-2 presents a State-level summary of the annual point source emissions in Version 3 of 

the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. Note that PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions are included in 

the inventory for all SCCs for which S/L agencies reported any form of PM, PM10, and/or PM2.5

emissions. If an agency did not report PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI but reported PM-PRI, PMFIL, PM-CON, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL, the PM augmentation procedures discussed in the 

TSD were applied to the form of PM emissions supplied by the agency to calculate emissions for 

the other forms of PM emissions. If an agency reported PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI emissions 

but not PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, or PM-CON emissions, the agency's inventory was not 

augmented to calculate filterable or condensible emissions. Note that PM-CON is associated 

with only fuel combustion sources. 
 19 

Table II-2. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Point Source Emissions by State (Tons/Year) 

State CO NH3 NOx

PM10- 

FIL 

PM10- 

PRI 

PM25- 

FIL 

PM25- 

PRI PM-CON SO2 VOC 

Connecticut 4,053 12,923 738 1,617 0 1,283 389 15,988 4,907 

Delaware 9,766 196 16,345 2,466 4,217 1,919 3,666 1,750 73,744 4,755 

District of 

Columbia 248 4 780 91 161 54 132 68 963 69 

Maine 17,005 845 19,939 4,535 7,289 2,567 5,787 2,753 23,711 5,319 

Maryland 99,024 305 95,328 3,723 9,029 0 5,054 2,018 290,927 6,184 

Massachusetts 21,262 1,463 47,086 2,776 5,852 997 4,161 2,984 101,049 8,263 

New 

Hampshire 2,725 74 9,759 1,180 3,332 786 2,938 2,151 46,560 1,599 

New Jersey 12,300 51,593 2,928 6,072 2,543 4,779 3 61,217 14,401 

New York 66,427 1,861 118,978 1,808 10,392 1,965 7,080 210 294,729 11,456 

Pennsylvania 121,524 1,388 297,379 18,044 40,587 6,038 20,116 5,065 995,175 37,323 

Rhode Island 2,234 58 2,764 233 300 117 183 68 2,666 1,928 

Vermont 1,078 787 130 304 97 267 2 905 1,097 

MANE-VU 357,645 6,194 673,660 38,654 89,150 17,083 55,447 17,462 1,907,634 97,300 
 20 

B. State-Specific Methods 

For each of the MANE-VU states and two local agencies in Pennsylvania, this section identifies 

the temporal basis of the emissions included in Version 3 and discusses revisions incorporated 

into Version 3. In addition, this section also discusses the origin of each S/L agency’s emissions 

included in Version 3. For each agency, a table is provided in Appendix A that lists the data 

source codes by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant. In addition, an electronic folder is 

provided for each S/L agency containing the QA Summary Reports prepared during Version 1 

and other files documenting revisions included in Versions 2 and 3. 

1. Connecticut 

Connecticut’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for the 

following revisions that Connecticut provided for Version 2 and included in Version 3: 

• Changed coordinates for AES Thames, Inc. in New London County to -72.3184, 41.4499 

(FIPS code 09011, facility identifier 1544). 

• Changed values for Hartford Steam (FIPS code 09003, facility identifier 3471), EU P0250, 

process 02 for summer daily values as follows: Changed actual throughput from 1934 

E6FT3 to 1.934 E6FT3, CO summer daily emissions from 53.185 tons to 0.0532 tons, 

NOx summer daily emissions from 255.288 tons to 0.1021 tons, and VOC summer daily 

emissions from 1.2569 tons to 0.0027 tons. 

Table II-3 shows the emission type periods for which Connecticut provided emissions. 

Table II-3. Connecticut 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 27 

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 27 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

Table A-1 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

Connecticut provided the data for CO, NOx, PM10-PRI, SO2, and VOC. Connecticut did not 

provide any data for NH3. Emissions for PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and PM-CON were 

calculated from the PM10-PRI emissions provided by Connecticut using the PM augmentation 

procedures. 
 21 

2. Delaware 

Delaware’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for some updates 

to ORIS Boiler IDs in the EU table that were incorporated into Version 2 and included in 

Version 3. Table II-4 shows the emission type periods for which Delaware provided emissions. 

Table II-4. Delaware 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

Table A-2 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

Delaware provided the data for CO, NH3, NOx, SO2, and VOC. Delaware also provided much of 

the PM emissions data but in some cases the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the 

PM data provided by Delaware to calculate emissions for other forms of PM (e.g., to estimate 

PM10-PRI from PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI from PM25-FIL, PM10-PRI and PM10-FIL from PM25-

PRI and PM25-FIL). 

3. District of Columbia 

The District of Columbia’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. Table 

II-5 shows the emission type period for which the District of Columbia provided emissions. 

Table II-5. District of Columbia 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

Table A-3 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

The District of Columbia provided the data for CO, NH3, NOx, SO2, and VOC. The District of 

Columbia provided at least one form of PM emissions and the PM augmentation procedures 

were applied to the emissions provided by the District of Columbia to calculate emissions for the 

other forms of PM. 
 22 

4. Maine 

Maine’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. Table II-6 shows the 

emission type periods for which Maine provided emissions. 

Table II-6. Maine 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

Table A-4 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

Maine provided the emissions data for CO, NH3, NOx, SO2, and VOC. Maine provided PM10-

FIL and/or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the 

emissions that Maine provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. 

5. Maryland 

Maryland’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for some updates 

to ORIS Boiler IDs in the EU table that were incorporated into Version 2 and included in 

Version 3. Table II-7 shows the emission type periods for which Maryland provided emissions. 

Table II-7. Maryland 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20040101 20041231 30 

NONANNUAL 20020101 20021231 29 

NONANNUAL 20020501 20020930 29 

NONANNUAL 20040101 20041231 29 

Table A-5 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

Maryland provided the emissions data for CO, NH3, NOx, SO2, VOC, PM10-PRI, and PM-PRI. 

The PM augmentation procedures were applied to the PM10-PRI emissions that Maryland 

provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. Maryland provided NH3 emissions 

for its point sources except for one new facility (state and county FIPS code 24013, facility ID 

0012, SCC 30500622, data source code P) for which it used NH3 emissions for four EUs 

(preheater kiln/dry process) prepared by MANE-VU. 
 23 

6. Massachusetts 

Massachusetts’ Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for the some 

stack parameter revisions that Massachusetts provided and were incorporated into Version 3. 

For Version 3, Massachusetts provided revisions to stack parameters in the ERP table for six 

EUs at three facilities. The revisions are listed in the Excel file named “MA Revisions to 

MANEVU V3 Point EI_040706.xls”. Table II-8 shows the emission type periods for which 

Massachusetts provided emissions. 

Table II-8. Massachusetts 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20030101 20031231 30 

Table A-6 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

Massachusetts provided the emissions data for CO, NH3, NOx, SO2, and VOC. Massachusetts 

provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation 

procedures were applied to the emissions that Massachusetts provided to calculate emissions for 

the other forms of PM. 

7. New Hampshire 

New Hampshire’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. 

Table II-9 shows the emission type periods for which New Hampshire provided emissions. 

Table II-9. New Hampshire 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

Table A-7 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

New Hampshire provided the emissions data for CO, NH3, NOx, SO2, and VOC. New 

Hampshire provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM 

augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that New Hampshire provided to 

calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. 
 24 

8. New Jersey 

New Jersey’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. In addition to the QA 

checks discussed previously in this TSD, New Jersey’s original inventory submittal to EPA 

contained several issues with SCCs. For Version 1, per direction provided by New Jersey, SCCs 

that were less than 8 digits were changed to SCCs with 8 digits. Also, as approved by New 

Jersey, inactive SCC 39999901 was changed to active SCC 39999999. The invalid unit “GAL” 

was changed to the valid unit “E6GAL” in the EP table. 

Table II-10 shows the emission type periods for which New Jersey provided emissions. 

Table II-10. New Jersey 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

Table A-8 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

New Jersey provided the emissions data for CO, NOx, SO2, and VOC. New Jersey provided PMPRI, PM10-PRI, and/or PM25-PRI emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were 

applied to the emissions that New Jersey provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of 

PM. New Jersey did not provide any data for NH3. 

9. New York 

New York’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for the following 

revisions that New York provided and were incorporated into Version 3. 

For Version 3, New York provided an Access database named “MANEVU_NY2002_ 

Point_Corrected_093005.mdb” with revisions to records in the EM table. New York also 

provided in this database 651 records that were not included in Version 2 of MANE-VU's point 

source inventory, and, therefore, these records were added to Version 3 of MANE-VU's point 

source inventory. The new records added emissions for pollutants (not in Version 2) for EUs 

and processes that existed in Version 2 of MANE-VU's point source inventory. 

The records in Version 2 that were revised and the records that were added to Version 3 are 

listed in the Excel file named “NY Revisions to MANE-VU V3 Point EI_040706.xls”. 

Table II-11 shows the emission type period for which New York provided emissions. 
 25 

Table II-11. New York 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

Table A-9 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

New York provided the emissions data for CO, NH3, NOx, SO2, and VOC. New York provided 

PM-PRI, PM10-PRI, and/or PM25-PRI emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures 

were applied to the emissions that New York provided to calculate emissions for the other forms 

of PM. New York provided NH3 emissions for its point sources except for four cement kilns for 

which it used NH3 emissions from a MANE-VU-sponsored inventory. The following identifies 

the facilities for which the MAEN-VU-sponsored NH3 emissions inventory for cement kilns was 

used. 

FIPS Code Facility ID SCC Data Source

 36001 4010300016 30500606 (2 kilns/dry process) P 

 36001 4012400001 30500706 (1 kiln/wet process) P

 36111 3514800084 30500606 (1 kiln/dry process) P

10. Pennsylvania (State, Excluding Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties) 

The Version 3 point source inventory for the state of Pennsylvania originates from Version 1. 

The following summary excludes Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties who provided their own 

point source inventories for Versions 1, 2, and 3. 

Table II-12 shows the emission type periods for which Pennsylvania provided emissions. Table 

A-10 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in 

the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

Pennsylvania provided the emissions data for CO, NH3, NOx, SO2, and VOC. Pennsylvania 

provided PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures 

were applied to the emissions that Pennsylvania provided to calculate emissions for the other 

forms of PM. 
 26 

Table II-12. Pennsylvania 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020104 30 ANNUAL 20020131 20020812 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020111 30 ANNUAL 20020131 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020120 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020228 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020123 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020424 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020130 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020831 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020131 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020930 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020212 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20021030 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020215 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20021130 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020221 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020228 30 ANNUAL 20020205 20021223 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020313 30 ANNUAL 20020213 20020913 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020329 30 ANNUAL 20020214 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020331 30 ANNUAL 20020216 20020331 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020412 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20020331 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020414 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20020430 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020422 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20020531 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020427 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20021031 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020430 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20021130 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020503 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020514 30 ANNUAL 20020311 20021213 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020517 30 ANNUAL 20020311 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020521 30 ANNUAL 20020314 20021209 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020531 30 ANNUAL 20020318 20021223 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020603 30 ANNUAL 20020320 20020915 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020614 30 ANNUAL 20020320 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020626 30 ANNUAL 20020328 20021120 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020628 30 ANNUAL 20020330 20021122 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020630 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020430 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020701 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020531 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020731 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020731 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020813 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020930 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020831 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020909 30 ANNUAL 20020409 20021205 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020415 20021117 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021031 30 ANNUAL 20020415 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021101 30 ANNUAL 20020421 20021024 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021112 30 ANNUAL 20020424 20021016 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021130 30 ANNUAL 20020428 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021213 30 ANNUAL 20020429 20020922 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021216 30 ANNUAL 20020429 20021031 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021217 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20020630 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021220 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20020930 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20021013 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021230 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20021031 30 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020102 20020703 30 ANNUAL 20020506 20021202 30 

ANNUAL 20020102 20021203 30 ANNUAL 20020511 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020102 20021215 30 ANNUAL 20020515 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020102 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020519 20020727 30 

ANNUAL 20020102 20021227 30 ANNUAL 20020525 20021231 30 
 27 

Table II-12. (Continued) 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020102 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20020602 30 

ANNUAL 20020102 20021229 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20020831 30 

ANNUAL 20020102 20021230 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20020930 30 

ANNUAL 20020102 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20021019 30 

ANNUAL 20020103 20021126 30 ANNUAL 20020603 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020103 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020606 20021127 30 

ANNUAL 20020103 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020629 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020104 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020701 20020731 30 

ANNUAL 20020104 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020701 20020930 30 

ANNUAL 20020104 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020701 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020105 20021218 30 ANNUAL 20020708 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020105 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20020831 30 

ANNUAL 20020106 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20020930 30 

ANNUAL 20020107 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20021130 30 

ANNUAL 20020108 20021221 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020108 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020802 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020110 20021204 30 ANNUAL 20020901 20020930 30 

ANNUAL 20020111 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020901 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020113 20021006 30 ANNUAL 20020920 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020114 20021203 30 ANNUAL 20021001 20021030 30 

ANNUAL 20020115 20020318 30 ANNUAL 20021001 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020115 20020323 30 ANNUAL 20021028 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020115 20020326 30 ANNUAL 20021101 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020115 20020830 30 ANNUAL 20021118 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020123 20020127 30 ANNUAL 20021201 20021231 30 

ANNUAL 20020124 20021127 30 

11. Pennsylvania (Allegheny County, FIPS code 42003) 

The Version 3 point source inventory for Allegheny County, Pennsylvania originates from 

Version 1. Table II-13 shows the emission type periods for which Allegheny County provided 

emissions. 

Table II-13. Pennsylvania - Allegheny County 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 
 28 

Table A-11 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and 

pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties 

by SCC. Allegheny County provided the emissions data for CO, NH3, NOx, SO2, and VOC. 

Allegheny County provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, and/or PM-CON emissions data 

and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Allegheny County 

provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. 

12. Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County, FIPS code 42101) 

The Version 3 point source inventory for Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania originates from 

Version 1. Table II-14 shows the emission type periods for which Philadelphia County provided 

emissions. 

Table II-14. Pennsylvania - Philadelphia County 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

Table A-12 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and 

pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties 

by SCC. Philadelphia County provided the emissions data for CO, NH3, NOx, SO2, and VOC. 

Philadelphia County provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM 

augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Philadelphia County provided to 

calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. 

13. Rhode Island 

Rhode Island requested that their Version 2 inventory be replaced with the CAP and NH3

inventory in the final 2002 point source NEI that EPA released during March 2006. Therefore, 

all of Rhode Island’s point source data in Version 2 was replaced with the point source data 

provided in the final 2002 point source NEI. The following provides a summary of the QA 

issues identified and addressed in Version 1. The Excel file named “RI Revisions to MANE-VU 

V3 Point EI_040706.xls” provides documentation and correction of each of these issues for 

Version 3. 

The Site table in the NEI did not include the ORIS IDs for all of the EGUs identified in the EGU 

crosswalk table. Therefore, the crosswalk table was used to add the ORIS IDs to the Site table. 

Matching of boiler IDs to the EU table for one facility was maintained in the NEI, and, therefore, 

included in Version 3 of MANE-VU’s inventory. However, matching of boiler IDs for other 

facilities was not available in the crosswalk table. 
 29 

The data source codes that EPA used in the Rhode Island’s point source inventory for the NEI 

were maintained in the MANE-VU inventory. The following defines the codes: 

 Code Description

A Augmented PM data. 

CAMD Record only in 2002 Emission Tracking System (ETS)/CEM for 

SO2, NOx, and heat input values; other emissions estimated.

SCAMD1 Data were received from the state. The state’s NOx and SO2

 emission values were replaced with the ETS values.

99_PMPRI Not defined – presumed to mean PM-PRI data originating from the 

 1999 NEI. 

SUM Primary PM emissions calculated as the sum of the filterable PM 

and PM-CON emissions 

DIFF PM-CON emissions calculated as the difference between the 

primary PM and filterable PM emissions 

QA of PM emissions was also performed in accordance with the QAPP for the 2002 base year 

inventory for EM table records that were revised or added for Rhode Island and New York. As a 

result, it was identified that the emission ton value was not correctly calculated from the 

emission unit numerator and emission numeric value fields in the NEI file, therefore, the 

emission ton value was corrected for the MANE-VU inventory. In addition, the final NEI for 

Rhode Island contained NH3 emissions for several facilities but no SCCs were provided for the 

NH3 emissions; therefore, the NH3 emissions were removed for the MANE-VU inventory as 

requested by Rhode Island. 

For Version 3 of MANE-VU's inventory, Facility ID EGU1036 and Facility Name 

MANCHESTER STREET in the final 2002 NEI was changed to Facility ID AIR936 and Facility 

Name USGEN NEW ENGLAND INC per Rhode Island’s request because this is the same 

facility (with ORIS ID 3236). Also, for State Facility ID AIR594, EU ID 2, ERP 2, and Process 

ID 2, the SCC was changed from 39000589 to 39000599. In addition, the ORIS IDs reported in 

the NEI were revised to make them consistent with the crosswalk prepared for MANE-VU that 

matches state facility IDs to ORIS IDs. 

One issue was identified with one record for Rhode Island where the sum of the PM10-FIL and 

PM-CON emissions was more than the PM10-PRI emissions, and the sum of the PM25-FIL and 

PM-CON emissions was more than the PM25-PRI emissions for facility ID AIR1248 in County 

FIPS 44007; SCC 10300601 (External Combustion Boilers : Commercial/Institutional : Natural 

Gas : > 100 Million Btu/hr). In addition, the PM10-FIL emissions reported was 1.6 tons more 

than the PM10-PRI emissions reported, and the PM25-FIL emissions reported was 1.6 tons more 

than the PM25-PRI emissions reported for this facility. The record has very low emissions and it 

was not clear how the PM consistency issues should be addressed; therefore, due to time and 

resource constraints, this issue was not corrected in Version 3. 

 

Table II-15 shows the emission type periods for which Rhode Island provided emissions. 
 30 

Table II-15. Rhode Island 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 30 

Table A-13 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and 

pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties 

by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once 

because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period 

combination. Rhode Island provided the emissions data for CO, NOx, SO2, VOC, and PM-PRI. 

The EPA applied PM augmentation procedures to the PM-PRI emissions that Rhode Island 

provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. The EPA added NH3 emissions for 

an EGU from EPA’s CAMD data; otherwise, NH3 emissions are not available for other point 

sources in Rhode Island. 

14. Vermont 

Vermont’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. Table II-16 shows the 

emission type periods for which Vermont provided emissions. 

Table II-16. Vermont 2002 Point, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

NONANNUAL 20020101 20020331 27 

NONANNUAL 20020101 20021231 29 

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 27 

Table A-14 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and 

pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties 

by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once 

because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period 

combination. Vermont provided the emissions data for CO, NOx, SO2, and VOC. Vermont 

provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation 

procedures were applied to the emissions that Vermont provided to calculate emissions for the 

other forms of PM. Vermont’s inventory does not include NH3 emissions. 

C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

This section provides a summary of potential revisions to incorporate into future versions of the 

MANE-VU point source inventory. 
 31 

All States – A coordinated effort between the S/L agencies should be developed to apply 

consistent methods to avoid having to apply procedures to augment inventory data to correct for 

the QA issues and fill in missing data as discussed previously in this chapter. For example, this 

will ensure that consistent methods are applied across S/L agencies to ensure accurate reporting 

of stack parameters, PM emissions, and minimize other QA issues that were identified during the 

development of Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the inventory. 

For PM emissions, the S/L agencies should develop and apply a consistent method for including 

condensible emissions for fuel combustion sources that can be applied when the agencies 

develop their inventories. This may include compiling the emission factors for all forms of PM 

into one database, organized by SCC and control type (for filterable emissions), and sharing the 

database among the MANE-VU S/L agencies. Use of a consistent set of emission factors will 

help to avoid the PM consistency issues identified in Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the MANE-VU 

inventory as well as ensure that condensible emissions are included in the primary emissions 

reported in the inventory. 

The EGU crosswalk should be maintained to ensure that State Facility IDs and EU IDs are 

correctly matched with ORIS IDs and boiler IDs. 

State-specific suggestions are as follows: 

Connecticut, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont – Include NH3 emissions. 

New Jersey – Develop a method to translate the SCCs that are less than 8 digits reported by 

facilities to 8 digit SCCs for reporting in the inventory. 
32

CHAPTER III – AREA SOURCES 

A. General Methods for all States 

1. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Version 1 of the 2002 MANE-VU area source inventory was built on the inventories that the 

State agencies submitted to EPA from May through July of 2004 as a requirement of the CERR. 

Except for Rhode Island, all of the MANE-VU States also submitted area source inventories to 

EPA. Rhode Island elected to use the preliminary 2002 NEI for its area source inventory. The 

EPA performed some limited QA review of the State inventories to identify format, referential 

integrity, and duplicate record issues. The EPA revised the inventories to address these issues 

and made the files available to the State agencies on August 6, 2004. These inventory files were 

used as the starting point for the MANE-VU inventory. These inventory files were obtained 

from EPA, consolidated into a single data set, subjected to extensive QA review, and revised (as 

approved by the MANE-VU State agencies) to address QA issues and fill data gaps identified 

while preparing Version 1. Subsequently, the following agencies provided revisions to their area 

source inventories: 

• Version 2 – District of Columbia, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, 

New York, and Vermont. 

• Version 3 – Massachusetts, Maine, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island. 

The Version 2 and 3 revisions for these States are discussed in section III.B (State-Specific 

Methods) of this chapter. In addition, as requested by MANE-VU, revisions were made to 

Version 3 to (1) add emissions for portable fuel containers (PFCs), industrial adhesives, and 

outdoor residential wood combustion for some States; (2) decrease the PM2.5 emissions for paved 

and unpaved roads and construction for all States; and (3) remove invalid CE records that 

originated from the preliminary 2002 NEI for some States. These revisions are explained in 

section III.A.3 of this chapter. 
33

To track the origin of data, the temporal period of emissions, and to facilitate generation of 

emission summaries, the following NIF plus fields were added to the EP, PE, EM, and CE tables: 

• Data Source Codes: 

For the area source inventory data, the data source codes are based on the following 9-character 

format: 

[Data Origin]-[Year]-[Grown/Not Grown/Carried Forward]-[PM Augmentation Code] 

Code Field Length

Data Origin 1 

Year 3 (including leading hyphen) 

Grown/Not Grown/Carried Forward 2 (including leading hyphen) 

PM Augmentation 3 (including leading hyphen) 

Data Origin Codes

Code Description 

S State agency-supplied data 

L Local agency-supplied data 

R Tribal agency-supplied data 

P Regional Planning Organization 

E EPA/Emission Factors and Inventory Group (EFIG)-generated data 

Year Codes

Year for which data are supplied (e.g., Year = -02 for 2002), or from which prior year 

data are taken (e.g., Year = -99 for 1999; -01=2001). 

Grown/Carried Forward/Not Grown Codes

Code Description 

-G Used when emissions in a pre-2002 inventory are grown to represent 2002 

emissions. 

-F Used when emissions in a pre-2002 inventory are carried forward and included 

in the 2002 inventory without adjustment for growth. 

-X Used when the emissions are not grown or are not carried forward. For 

example, X is used when emissions are calculated for the 2002 inventory using 

2002 activity, or when data are replaced with 2002 State data. 
34

PM Augmentation Codes

-PA PM Augmented Emissions: Record for PM10/PM2.5 emissions that were 

updated or added using ad-hoc updates. 

-PC PM Augmented Emissions: Record added for PM10/PM2.5 emissions estimated 

using the PM Calculator. 

-PR PM Augmented Emissions: Record added for PM10/PM2.5 emissions estimated 

using ratios of PM10-to-PM or PM2.5-to-PM10. If PM10 and PM2.5 emissions 

are equal and one of the pollutants is assigned this code, the ratio is assumed to 

be 1. 

• Revision Date: This field indicates the month and year during which the last revision was 

made to a record. 

 

• State FIPS: This field indicates the State FIPS code of the submittal. 

• County FIPS: This field indicates the county FIPS code of the inventory. 

The following NIF plus fields were added to the EM table: 

• Emission Ton Value: This field indicates the values of the emissions in tons. This field 

was used to prepare summaries of emissions on a consistent EU basis. 

• Emission Type Period: This field indicates the period of the Emission Type – either 

ANNUAL, SEASONAL, MONTHLY, or DAILY. Emission table records designated as 

ANNUAL were used to prepare summaries of annual emissions. 

• CAP_HAP: This field identifies records for CAP versus records for HAPs. For the 

MANE-VU inventory, the flag is CAP for all records. 

• Year: This field indicates the year of the data; for this inventory, it is 2002. 

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? 

A QAPP was prepared and approved by MANE-VU/MARAMA and the EPA Regional Office 

prior to initiating work on Version 1 of the inventory (MANE-VU, 2004a). This QAPP was 

followed during preparation of all three versions of the inventory. This section provides an 

overview of the QA checks completed on each version of the inventory. The QA process for 

each State inventory involved the following steps that are also included in the following 

discussion: 

• Conduct QA checks on each State inventory; 

• Prepare a QA Summary Report for submittal to the agency for review; 

• Revise the inventory to resolve QA issues as directed by the agency; 

• Repeat the QA checks on the revised inventory to verify that the corrections were 

completed; 
35

• Perform augmentation to correct for missing data; and 

• Repeat the QA checks to verify that the augmentation was completed correctly. 

a. QA checks for State emission inventories 

The following QA checks were run on each State inventory: 

i. County and SCC coverage 

ii. Pollutant coverage 

iii. EPA QA summaries sent to State agencies 

iv. Range errors 

v. PM emissions consistency and completeness review

vi. Control device type and control efficiency data review 

vii. Start and end date checks 

viii. Annual and daily emissions comparison 

County and SCC Coverage

The county coverage in the State inventories appeared to be reasonable for all States. The SCC 

coverage was difficult to evaluate simply by showing a count of the number of SCCs by State. 

Each State inventory was compared to the preliminary 2002 NEI, and area source categories in 

the NEI but not in a State inventory were sent to each agency for review. Each State agency then 

selected the NEI categories that were then added to the MANE-VU inventory. 

Pollutant Coverage

The pollutant coverage in the State inventories was complete for all pollutants except for PM10

and PM2.5. Diagnosis and resolution of PM10 and PM2.5 pollutant emissions is discussed later in 

section III.A.2.c. The exception was Connecticut who included only VOC, NOx, and CO 

emissions in its inventory submittal to EPA. 

EPA QA Summaries Sent to State Agencies

Under a separate project with EPA, Pechan performed QA review of the State area source 

inventories. This QA review involved running EPA’s QA program on each data set to identify 

and resolve QA issues. Using the results of this QA work, Pechan prepared two sets of QA 

summaries that EPA sent to the State agencies. Pechan contacted each State agency with QA 

issues identified in the EPA reports to obtain direction for correcting the QA issues identified in 

the reports. The following explains these two summaries: 
36

High-level Summary of State Inventories Submitted to EPA: 

The first summary was an Excel workbook file with four spreadsheets that provided the 

following information: 

• 2002 Nonpoint File Names: This spreadsheet documented names and formats of the 

files that EPA received from the State agencies and the dates on which they were 

transferred to Pechan. 

• 2002 Nonpoint Summary: This spreadsheet documented the name of the state 

agency, type of inventory (i.e., CAP, HAP, or both), a comparison of the number of 

the counties in the inventory to the total number of counties in the State to identify 

the geographic coverage of the inventory, a unique list of CAP codes, and the total 

number of area source SCCs. This spreadsheet also indicated if any nonroad or 

onroad emissions data were moved from the agency’s area source inventory to its 

nonroad or onroad inventory. 

• 2002 Nonpoint Emission Sums: This spreadsheet summarized emissions by start 

date, end date, and emission type and assigned the appropriate code to the emission 

type period NIF plus field. 

• 2002 Nonpoint Error Summary: This spreadsheet provided a copy of the 

“SummaryStats” table from the EPA QA program (EPA, 2004a). This table 

provided the count of records for each NIF 3.0 table and identified the number of 

records with errors by type of error. 

Detailed Summary of QA Issues: 

This summary (sent to State agencies on August 11) was prepared in a text file that listed by 

State and NIF table the number of records with errors, and provided corrections for the errors. 

To support documentation of corrections to some of the errors in the text file, Pechan prepared 

an Excel workbook file that summarized the following errors and corrections by State: invalid 

pollutants codes; invalid units; invalid maximum achievable control technology (MACT) codes; 

and invalid and inactive SCCs. A spreadsheet was also included to show the mapping of 

standard industrial classification (SIC) codes to North American Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes. This crosswalk was used to correct invalid NAICS codes if a valid SIC code 

was available in the State inventories and vice versa. 
37

Additional QA for the MANE-VU Area Source Inventory

The following explains additional QA and data tracking that was performed for the MANE-VU 

inventory. The following data elements were reviewed to identify QA issues: 

• Range Errors; 

• PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness; 

• Control Device Codes and Control Efficiency Values;

• Start and End Dates; 

• Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison; and 

• Comparison of State Inventories to the 2002 Preliminary NEI. 

For each State inventory for which QA issues were identified, a separate QA Summary Report 

was prepared in an Excel workbook file, and sent to each State agency for review. The State 

agencies provided directions in the Excel Workbook file, via e-mail, or by submitting revised 

records in NIF 3.0 in an Access database to correct the inventories. The QA reports are 

discussed under section III.A.2.b. 

Range Errors

The EPA’s QA program contains routines that compare annual emission values, numeric fields 

in the PE and EP tables, and other temporal numeric fields against a range of values. The QA 

program flags records that are less than or greater than the range of values for review. Pechan 

summarized the range errors for the State agencies to review and provide corrections. According 

to EPA, the ranges to which values in inventories are compared represent “normal” ranges that 

are based on percentiles from previous inventories. The range values are conservative in that 

EPA wants to identify suspicious values even though the values may be real (Thompson, 2002).

PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness Review

The following consistency checks were performed at the EM table data key level (for annual 

emissions) to compare PM emissions: 

• If an SCC was associated with a PM emission record, but was missing one or more of 

the following (as appropriate for the SCC [i.e., PM-CON is associated with fuel 

combustion only]): PM10-FIL, PM10-PRI, PM25-FIL, PM25-PRI, or PM-CON, the 

record was flagged for review. 

• The following equations were used to determine consistency: 

 PM10-FIL + PM-CON = PM10-PRI 

 PM25-FIL + PM-CON = PM25-PRI 
38

• The following comparisons were made to determine consistency: 

 PM10-PRI >= PM10-FIL 

 PM25-PRI >= PM25-FIL 

 PM10-PRI >= PM-CON 

 PM25-PRI >= PM-CON 

 PM10-FIL >= PM25-FIL 

 PM10-PRI >= PM25-PRI 

If the data failed one of these checks it was diagnosed as an error. If a State agency did not 

provide corrections to these errors, the errors were corrected/filled in according to an 

augmentation procedure explained in section III.A.2.c. 

For information purposes, all PM-PRI and PM-FIL records were flagged to indicate that these 

pollutants were included instead of, or in addition to, the standard PM10-PRI/FIL, PM25-

PRI/FIL, and PM-CON pollutants. 

Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data Review

The CE codes in the “Primary Device Type Code” and “Secondary Device Type Code” fields 

were reviewed to identify invalid codes (i.e., codes that did not exist in the NIF 3.0 reference 

table) and missing codes (e.g., records with a null or uncontrolled code of 000 but with control 

efficiency data). 

QA review of control efficiency data involved diagnosis of two types of errors. First, records 

were reviewed to identify control efficiency values that were reported as a decimal rather than as 

a percent value. Records with control efficiencies with decimal values were flagged as a 

potential error (although not necessarily an error, since the real control efficiency may be less 

than 1%). Records with a 1% control efficiency value were also identified for review by the 

State agency to determine if the value was reported as a decimal in its internal data system but 

rounded to 1% when the data were converted to NIF 3.0. 

The second check identified records where 100% control was reported in the CE table, but the 

emissions in the EM table were greater than zero and the rule effectiveness value in the EM table 

was null, zero, or 100% (implying 100% control of emissions). Because many agencies did not 

populate the rule effectiveness field or a default value of zero was assigned, records with null or 

zero rule effectiveness values were included where the CE was 100% and emissions were greater 

than zero. For records that met these criteria, Pechan consulted with the State agency to 

determine if corrections were needed to any of the fields. 

Start and End Date Checks

QA review was conducted to identify start and end date values in the PE and EM tables to 

confirm consistency with the inventory year in the TR table, and to confirm that the end date 

reported was greater than the start date reported. 
39

Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison

The State inventories were reviewed to determine if any of the following conditions existed: 

• Multiple records coded at the SCC level as emission type 30, but with different start 

and end dates. While not a true duplicate, this may indicate an error or inclusion of 

both annual and seasonal values. 

• Multiple records coded at the SCC level as a daily emission type (27, 29, etc.) but 

with different start and end dates. While not a true duplicate, this may indicate an 

error or just inclusion of additional types of daily emissions. 

• Multiple records coded at the SCC level with the same start and end date, but 

different emission types. While not a true duplicate, this may indicate an error or 

just inclusion of additional types of daily emissions. 

• Any “DAILY” type record that was missing its associated “ANNUAL” record was 

flagged for review. 

• Any “DAILY” type record that was greater than its associated “ANNUAL” record 

was flagged for review. 

b. Responses from State Agencies 

QA Summary Reports were sent to the State agencies to review the QA issues identified. The 

State agencies were asked to return these reports to MANE-VU with their corrections 

documented in the reports. These reports were then used to document revisions to the State 

inventories. The QA Summary Reports containing the revisions provided by the State agencies 

are provided in Excel Workbook files with this TSD. 

c. Gap Filling and Augmentation 

This section explains the methods used to add data for categories and/or pollutants missing in a 

State’s inventory after revising the inventory to address QA issues. 

i. MANE-VU sponsored inventories 

ii. PM augmentation 

iii. Fossil fuel combustion sources 

iv. Other sources of PM emissions 

v. Merging of NEI data into S/L inventories 

vi. Revisions to the preliminary 2002 NEI incorporated into Version 1 of 

the MANE-VU inventory 

vii. Additional work on Area source methods 

- Fugitive Dust Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads 

- Wildfires and Prescribed Burning 
40

The following discusses the augmentation procedures that were applied to the State inventories 

to improve the inventories or to fill in missing data not supplied by the State agencies. 

MANE-VU -Sponsored Inventories

MANE-VU sponsored inventory development for residential wood combustion, open burning, 

public owned treatment works (POTWs), compositing, and industrial refrigeration. At the 

beginning of the project for developing Version 1, each State agency was requested to indicate if 

it (1) included the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory for one or more of these categories in the 

inventory it submitted to EPA; (2) included its own estimates for a category in the inventory it 

submitted to EPA; or (3) if it did not include a category in its inventory, if the MANE-VUsponsored inventory or the 2002 preliminary NEI should be used as the source of data for the 

category. The results of this Version 1 inventory development request are summarized in Table 

III-1. 

Improvements to fugitive dust emissions for the paved and unpaved road categories were 

completed after the draft version of the consolidated area source inventory was prepared. 

Agencies provided guidance on if they wanted the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory for these two 

categories to replace the paved and unpaved road inventories they had included in their 

inventories. For paved roads, all States requested that the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory be 

used; however, New Jersey and Maryland requested that the winter-time sand/silt adjustment not 

be included in their inventories. For unpaved roads, nine of the 12 States requested that the 

MANE-VU-sponsored inventory be used. New Jersey requested that its unpaved road inventory 

be used instead of the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory. In addition, the District of Columbia 

and Delaware do not have any unpaved road activity and excluded this category from their 

inventories. 

PM Augmentation

Procedures were developed to estimate missing pollutant data from data provided by the State 

agencies in order to develop a complete set of PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions to support air 

quality modeling. The following discusses the procedures for fossil fuel combustion sources first 

followed by the procedures for all other area sources of PM emissions. 

Fossil Fuel Combustion Sources

Fossil fuel combustion sources include industrial, commercial/institutional, and residential 

anthracite coal, bituminous/subbituminous coal, distillate oil and kerosene, residual oil, natural 

gas, and LPG. All of these sources emit both filterable and condensible emissions. The QA 

review of the PM emissions data for these sources focused on verifying that the emissions 

reported in the State inventories included both filterable and condensible emissions. The 

emissions for these pollutants can be reported in State inventories individually (i.e., as filterable 

and condensible separately) or as primary emissions (i.e., the sum of the filterable and 

condensible emissions). The QA review also focused on evaluating the emission factors reported 

in the State inventories to determine if they were reasonable. 
41 

Table III-1. Summary of MANE-VU-Sponsored Inventories Included in Version 1 of th

Source Consolidated Emissions Inventory 

MANE-VU Inventory Included in 

State’s Inventory Submitted to 

EPA 

Not Included in State’s 

Inventory - Add to MANE-VU 

Inventory 

State’s Inventory Include

Developed Estimat

Area Source 

Category Pollutant SCCs Annual 

Summer 

Day 

Winter 

Day Annual 

Summer 

Day 

Winter 

Day Annual 

Summer 

Day 

POTWs NH3, VOC 2630020010 

(Wastewater 

Treatment) 

DE, NJ, PA DE, NJ, PA VT VT CT, DC, DE, 

MA, MD, NH, 

NJ, NY 

CT, DC, DE, 

MA, MD, NH

NJ 

 2630020020 

(Biosolids 

Processes) 

DE, NJ, PA DE, NJ, PA VT VT CT, DC, DE, 

MA, MD, NH, 

NJ, NY 

CT, DC, DE, 

MA, MD, NH

NJ 

 2630050000 

(Digested Sludge) 

DE, NH, 

NJ, PA 

DE, NH, NJ, 

PA 

VT VT CT, DC, DE, 

MA, MD, NY

CT, DC, DE, 

MA, MD 

Composting NH3, VOC 2680001000 (Biosolids) NH, NJ NH, NJ CT, DC, MA, ME, 

PA, VT 

CT, DC, MA, 

ME, PA, VT

 2680002000 

(Mixed Biosolids and 

Green Waste) 

NH, NJ NH, NJ CT, DC, 

MA, ME, 

PA, VT 

CT, DC, MA, 

ME, PA, VT

 2680003000 

(Composting; Green 

Waste) 

DC, MA, 

ME 

DC, MA, ME

Industrial Refrigeration 

NH3 2399010000 ME, NH, 

NJ 

ME, NH, NJ CT, MA, 

PA, VT 

CT, MA, PA, 

VT 

2104008000 

(Indoor) 

MA, MD, 

NH 

MA, MD, 

NH 

MA, MD, 

NH 

CT, DE, 

ME 

CT, DE, ME CT, DE, 

ME 

Residential NJ, NY, VT NJ Wood Combustion 

All criteria 

pollutants/ 

precursors, and 

many toxic air 

pollutants 

2104008070 

(Outdoor) 

MA, MD, 

NH 

MA, MD, 

NH 

MA, MD, 

NH 

CT, DE, 

ME 

CT, DE, ME CT, DE, 

ME 

2610000100 

(Leaves) 

MA, MD, 

NH, PA 

DC, DE, 

NY, VT 

NJ NJ 

2610000400 

(Brush) 

MA, MD, 

PA 

CT, DC, 

DE, NY, VT

NJ NJ 

2610030000 

(Municipal Solid 

Waste) 

MA, MD, 

PA 

DC, DE, 

NY 

NH, NJ NH, NJ 

Open Burning All criteria pollutants/ 

precursors, and 

many toxic air 

pollutants 

2610040400 

(Municipal Yard 

Waste) 

MA, NY, 

PA 

DC, NY, 

VT 

DE, NJ DE, NJ 
Table III-1 (continued) 

42 

Notes: Gray shading identifies categories for which daily emissions are not available. POTWs: CT, MD: Provided VOC but not NH3 emissions in its State inventory. 

DC, MA, MD, ME, NH, RI: Reported POTW emissions under SCC 2630020000 (Total Processed). DE: MANE-VU inventory used for NH3; DE provided its own VOC emissions under SCC 2630020000 (Total Processed). 

NJ: MANE-VU-sponsored inventory used for NH3 only. NJ included its own inventory for the other criteria pollutants under SCCs 2630010000 and 2630020000. 

NY: Reported VOC emissions under SCC 2630000000 (from the preliminary 2002 NEI) and SCC 2630020000 (State-developed inventory). MANE-VU-sponsored 

Composting: CT, NH: SCC 2680003000 is not in the MANE-VU-sponsored composting inventory for these States. DE: This State does not have composting activity. MD: State requested that the MANE-VU inventory for this category not be included in its inventory. NY, RI: Did not include emissions for this category in the 2002 inventory. Industrial Refrigeration: DC: Requested that the preliminary 2002 NEI be used but the NEI does not contain any emissions for this category in DC. 

DE: State-developed emissions are included in point source inventory. MD, RI: Did not include emissions for this category in its inventory. ME: Used the MANE-VU inventory emissions under SCC 2302080002 (Miscellaneous Food and Kindred Products/Refrigeration). NH: Original inventory submittal to EPA includes SO2 and PM emissions for SCC 2399000000 from the preliminary 2002 NEI; NH3 emissions for SCC 239901000

NY: Original inventory submittal to EPA includes SO2 and PM emissions for SCC 2399000000 from the preliminary 2002 NEI; NY did not use the MANE-VU-spon

2399010000. 

Residential Wood Combustion: DC: RWC inventory in 2002 NEI covers seven SCCs and does not include daily emissions. Open Burning: CT: Statewide activity for SCC 2610000100 (Leaves) and SCC 2610030000 (Municipal Solid Waste) is negligible. 

 For SCCs 2610000400 (Brush) and 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Waste), State initially provided VOC, NOx, and CO emissions under SCC 2610000000 whic

master SCC list. CT recalculated emissions to include VOC, NOx, CO, PM10-PRI/-FIL, and PM25-PRI/-FIL, and placed the emissions on valid SCC 261

since the majority of the activity is associated with activities covered by this SCC. 

MD: The MANE-VU inventory for SCC 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Waste) reports zero emissions indicating that the activity for the category does not occur in M

inventory for this reason. 

NH: Did not include NH3 emissions in MANE-VU inventory for SCC 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Waste). 
43 

To support the QA review effort, the uncontrolled PM emission factors shown in Table III-2 

were compiled from AP-42. The emission factors reported in the State inventories were 

compared to the emission factors in this table. Emission factors that appeared too high or too 

low were flagged for review by the State agency. In addition, inventory data were flagged for 

review by the State agency if the emissions were reported under the primary PM pollutant codes 

but the emission factors matched with the emission factors for filterable PM in Table III-2. 

Finally, if emission factors were not reported in the State agency inventory, the emission factors 

were back-calculated using the throughput data (if available), emissions, rule effectiveness 

values, and control efficiency data (if available). The back-calculated emission factors were 

compared to the factors in Table III-2 to identify data with major difference between the factors. 

It is emphasized that the uncontrolled emission factors in Table III-2 were used as a reference for 

reviewing State inventory data. The emission factors in this table should not be construed to be 

the best available for all State agencies since the emission factors will vary depending on the 

composition of the boiler population in an agency’s area source inventory. 

Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania 

provided their own inventory for all fossil fuel combustion categories. Connecticut, the District 

of Columbia, Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont used fossil fuel combustion inventory data in 

the preliminary 2002 NEI for some or all of the categories. The following provides details on the 

origin of the fossil fuel combustion inventories for these States: 

 

Connecticut supplied VOC, NOx, and CO emissions from its 1999 inventory for industrial 

and commercial/institutional fossil fuel combustion. PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, SO2, and 

NH3 emissions were taken from preliminary NEI estimates (carried forward from 

Version 3 of the 1999 NEI). For the residential sector, Connecticut’s inventory was taken 

from the preliminary 2002 NEI. Connecticut provided guidance on the counties with 

natural gas and LPG activity for which to use the NEI estimates. 

For the District of Columbia, the preliminary NEI was used to gap fill missing PM10-PRI 

and PM25-PRI emissions for commercial/institutional bituminous/ subbituminous coal 

combustion and PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, SO2, and NH3 for commercial/institutional natural 

gas combustion. The NEI estimates for these commercial/institutional categories were 

carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI. The District of Columbia used the NEI 

estimates for residential bituminous/subbituminous coal combustion. 

Maine and Rhode Island used the preliminary 2002 NEI for all three sectors. The NEI 

estimates for the industrial and commercial/institutional sectors were carried forward from 

Version 3 of the 1999 NEI, while the residential sector estimates are based on 2000 or 

2002 activity estimates prepared by EPA. 

Vermont used the preliminary 2002 NEI for the industrial and commercial/ institutional 

sectors and residential anthracite coal (carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI), 

but provided its own inventory for residential distillate oil, natural gas, and LPG. 

 
44 

Table III-2. Area Source Industrial, Commercial/Institutional, and Residential Fossil Fuel 

Uncontrolled Emission Factors for PM10-PRI/FIL, PM25-PRI/FIL, and PM-CON 

Pollutant1 

Uncontrolled Emission Factor (EF) EF Numerator EF Denominator 

Calculated Uncontrolled EF Reference 

Industrial Boilers: Anthracite Coal (SCC 2102001000) PM10-FIL 2.3 x % Ash content 

of coal 

LB TON 30.77 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula o

(13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 20

PM25-FIL 0.6 x % Ash content 

of coal 

LB TON 8.03 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula o

(13.38%) (used Commercial/Institutional emissiocontent is EPA, 2002. 

PM-CON 0.08 x % Ash 

content of coal 

LB TON 1.07 AP-42 Table 1.2-3 Used formula for SCC 10300

formula of .08 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Refer2002. 

PM10-PRI LB TON 31.84 PM25-PRI LB TON 9.10 Industrial Boilers: Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal (SCC 2102002000) PM10-FIL 13.2 LB TON 13.2 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EF (used Commercial/InstitutPM25-FIL 4.6 LB TON 4.6 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EF (used Commercial/InstitutPM-CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP-42 Table 1.1-5 (used Commercial/InstitutionaPM10-PRI LB TON 14.24 PM25-PRI LB TON 5.64 Industrial Boilers and IC Engines: Distillate Oil (SCC 2102004000) PM10-FIL 1 LB E3GAL 1 AP-42 Table 1.3-6 PM25-FIL 0.25 LB E3GAL 0.25 AP-42 Table 1.3-6 PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2 PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.30 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 1.55 Industrial Boilers: Residual Oil (SCC 2102005000) PM10-FIL 7.17 x % Sulfur 

content of oil 

LB E3GAL 10.683 AP-42 Table 1.3-5. EF calculated from formula 

A=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of 

PM25-FIL 4.67 x % Sulfur 

content of oil 

LB E3GAL 6.958 AP-42 Table 1.3-5. EF calculated from formula 

A=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of 

PM-CON 1.5 LB E3GAL 1.5 AP-42 Table 1.3-2 PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 12.18 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 8.46 Industrial Boilers and IC Engines: Natural Gas (SCC 2102006000) PM10-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2 PM25-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2 PM-CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP-42 Table 1.4-2 PM10-PRI 7.6 LB E6FT3 7.60 PM25-PRI 7.6 LB E6FT3 7.60 
Table III-2 (continued) 

45 

Pollutant1 

Uncontrolled Emission Factor (EF) EF Numerator EF Denominator 

Calculated Uncontrolled EF Reference 

Industrial Boilers - Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2102007000) PM10-FIL 0.6 LB E3GAL 0.6 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 PM25-FIL 0.6 LB E3GAL 0.6 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 PM-CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM-CON emission factor of 5.

PM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0

factor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas to Reference: AP-42, Table 1.4-2. Conversion facnatural gas (AP-42, Table 1.4-2) and 90,500 BtuAppendix A, page A-5). 

PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 1.11 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 1.11 Industrial Boilers: Kerosene (SCC 2102011000) PM10-FIL 1 LB E3GAL 1 AP-42 Table 1.3-6 PM25-FIL 0.25 LB E3GAL 0.25 AP-42 Table 1.3-6 PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-6 PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.30 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 1.55 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Anthracite Coal (SCC 2103001000) PM10-FIL 2.3 x % Ash content 

of coal 

LB TON 30.77 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula o

(13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 20

PM25-FIL 0.6 x % Ash content 

of coal 

LB TON 8.03 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula o

(13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 20

PM-CON 0.08 x % Ash 

content of coal 

LB TON 1.07 AP-42 Table 1.2-3 Used formula for SCC 10300

formula of 0.08 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Refe2002. 

PM10-PRI LB TON 31.84 PM25-PRI LB TON 9.10 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Bituminous and Lignite (SCC 2103002000) PM10-FIL 13.2 LB TON 13.2 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EF PM25-FIL 4.6 LB TON 4.6 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EF PM-CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP-42 Table 1.1-5 (0.04 lb/MMBtu * 26MMBtu/toPM10-PRI LB TON 14.24 PM25-PRI LB TON 5.64 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Distillate Oil (SCC 2103004000) PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2 PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.13 
Table III-2 (continued) 

46 

Pollutant1

Uncontrolled Emission Factor (EF) EF Numerator EF Denominator 

Calculated Uncontrolled EF Reference 

Commercial/Institutional Heating: Residual Oil (SCC 2103005000) PM10-FIL 5.17 x % Sulfur 

content of oil 

LB E3GAL 7.703 AP-42 Table 1.3-7. EF calculated from formula 

A=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of 

PM25-FIL 1.92 x % Sulfur 

content of oil 

LB E3GAL 2.861 AP-42 Table 1.3-7. EF calculated from formula 

A=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of 

PM-CON 1.5 LB E3GAL 1.5 AP-42, Table 1.3-2 PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 9.20 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 4.36 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Natural Gas (SCC 2103006000) PM10-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2 PM25-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2 PM-CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP-42 Table 1.4-2 PM10-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60 PM25-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2103007000) PM10-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Propane for Commercial BoiPM25-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Propane for Commercial BoiPM-CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM-CON emission factor of 5.

PM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0

factor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas to Reference: AP-42, Table 1.4-2. Conversion facnatural gas (AP-42, Table 1.4-2) and 90,500 BtuAppendix A, page A-5). 

PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Kerosene (SCC 2103011000) PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.13 Residential Heating: Anthracite Coal (SCC 2104001000) PM10-FIL 10 LB TON 10 EPA, 2002. PM25-FIL 0.6 x % Ash content 

of coal 

LB TON 8.03 EF calculated from formula of 0.6 * % Ash Conte

EF and ash content is EPA, 2002. 

PM-CON 0.08 x % Ash 

content of coal 

LB TON 1.07 EF calculated from formula of 0.08 * % Ash Con

EF and ash content is EPA, 2002. 

PM10-PRI LB TON 11.07 PM25-PRI LB TON 9.10 
Table III-2 (continued) 

47 

Pollutant1

Uncontrolled Emission Factor (EF) EF Numerator EF Denominator 

Calculated Uncontrolled EF Reference 

Residential Heating: Bituminous and Lignite Coal (SCC 2104002000) PM10-FIL 6.2 LB TON 6.2 AP-42 Table 1.1-11 PM25-FIL 3.8 LB TON 3.8 AP-42 Table 1.1-11 PM-CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP-42 Table 1.1-5 (0.04 lb/MMBtu * 26 MMBtu/tPM10-PRI LB TON 7.24 PM25-PRI LB TON 4.84 Residential Heating: Distillate Oil (SCC 2104004000) PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 (Commercial/Institutional EF) PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 (Commercial/Institutional EF) PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2 PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.13 Residential Heating: Natural Gas - All types (SCC 2104006000) PM10-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4.2 PM25-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4.2 PM-CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP-42 Table 1.4.2 PM10-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60 PM25-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60 Residential Heating: Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2104007000) PM10-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Same factor used for Propan

based on EIIP) 

PM25-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Same factor used for Propan

based on EIIP) 

PM-CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM-CON emission factor of 5.

PM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0

factor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas to Reference: AP-42, Table 1.4-2. Conversion facnatural gas (AP-42, Table 1.4-2) and 90,500 BtuAppendix A, page A-5). 

PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91 Residential Heating: Kerosene (SCC 2104011000) PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38 PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.13 1 PM10-PRI EF = sum of PM10-FIL and PM-CON emission factors; PM25-PRI EF = sum of PM25-FIL and PM-CON emission factors. 
48

Revisions to the NEI for residential LPG and kerosene were completed after the preliminary 

2002 NEI was released in February 2004. Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maine, and 

Rhode Island approved replacement of the preliminary 2002 NEI estimates with the revised 

estimates for LPG. Connecticut was the only State that elected to use the NEI for the residential 

kerosene category, and Connecticut approved replacing the preliminary 2002 NEI for this 

category with the revised inventory prepared by EPA. 

Other Sources of PM Emissions

For States that provided only PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL emissions, PM10-PRI emissions were 

set equal to PM10-FIL emissions and PM25-PRI emissions were set equal to PM25-FIL 

emissions. The PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions that were added to the inventory were 

assigned a data source code of S-02-X-PR where S-02-X represents the code assigned to the 

PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL emissions provided by the State agency and the “-PR” indicates that 

the ratio was applied to estimate the primary emissions (in this case, the ratio of primary to 

filterable emissions is “1”). 

PM25-PRI emissions missing from State inventories were estimated by applying a ratio of 

PM25-PRI-to-PM10-PRI emissions to the PM10-PRI emissions provided by the State agency. 

Table III-3 identifies the agencies with SCCs for which ratios were applied to estimate PM25-

PRI emissions. This table also shows the ratios and the reference for the ratios. 
49

Table III-3. SCCs for which PM25-PRI Emissions were Estimated by Applying a 

Ratio to the PM10-PRI Emissions in the State inventory 

SCC SCC Description Agency 

Ratio of 

PM25-

PRI to 

PM10-

PRI Reference 

2309100010 Industrial Processes: Fabricated Metals: 

SIC 34: Coating, Engraving, and Allied 

Services: Electroplating 

NY 0.947 AP-42 emission factors for hard chrome 

plating tank controlled with mist 

eliminator. AP-42 (Table 12.20-3) 

shows 94.7% of total PM as less than 

2.35 micrometers. Applied factor to 

State-supplied PM10-PRI emissions to 

estimate PM25-PRI emissions. 

2461023000 Solvent Utilization: Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Commercial: Asphalt Roofing: 

Total: All Solvent Types 

MA 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI 

equals PM10-PRI. 

2601000000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery: 

On-site Incineration: All Categories: Total 

MD, NH 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI 

equals PM10-PRI. 

2610000100 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery: 

On-site Incineration: All Categories: Yard 

Waste - Leaf Species Unspecified 

NH 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI 

equals PM10-PRI. 

2810001000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other 

Combustion: Forest Wildfires: Total 

MD 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI 

equals PM10-PRI. 

2810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other 

Combustion: Prescribed Burning for Forest 

Management: Total 

MD 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI 

equals PM10-PRI. 

2810020000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other 

Combustion: Prescribed Burning of 

Rangeland: Total 

MD 0.86 Based on ratio of PM25-PRI to PM10-

PRI for same SCC used by States in 

2002 NEI. 

2810030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other 

Combustion: Structure Fires: Total 

MD, NH 0.91 NEI Method. 

2810050000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other 

Combustion: Motor Vehicle Fires: Total 

MD, NH 0.91 NEI Method. 

d. 2002 NEI 

Merging of NEI Data into State Inventories

The area source inventory provided by each State agency was compared to the 2002 NEI to 

identify categories in the NEI that were not in each State inventory. The list of categories 

identified was provided to each State agency and each agency then selected the NEI categories to 

be added to its inventory. Identification of categories included in the 2002 NEI but not in a State 

inventory involved a two-step process. First, Pechan identified the categories in the NEI that did 

not have an electronic match on the data key of the EM table between the State inventory and the 

NEI. Then, Pechan manually compared the NEI categories without an electronic match to the 

State inventory to identify and eliminate NEI categories that were in the State inventory but had 

a different SCC. For example, a State inventory may use a general SCC for a category while the 

NEI may use different SCCs to breakout emissions at a finer detail. Examples of categories 

where this typically occurred include the residential wood combustion, open burning of land 

clearing debris, solvent utilization, and petroleum marketing and transportation categories. In 
50

addition, if a State agency requested that a MANE-VU-sponsored inventory be added to its 

inventory, the NEI categories that overlapped with the MANE-VU -sponsored categories were 

removed from the list of NEI categories considered for incorporation into a State inventory. 

The source categories in the 2002 NEI that were added to a State inventory can be identified 

where the data source code starts with “E”. These categories can be identified using the data 

source code field in the NIF 3.0 files or in the summary of area source emissions that contains 

the data source code. 

Revisions to the Preliminary 2002 NEI

During preparation of the MANE-VU inventory, EPA completed revisions to the emissions for 

six categories in the preliminary 2002 NEI released in February 2004. As agreed to with each 

State agency, the revised emissions were used in the MANE-VU inventory in lieu of the 

preliminary 2002 NEI emissions if the agency requested that the category be included. 

• Non-Residential Construction (SCC 2311020000): 2002 emissions data replaced 

data in preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI. 

• Highway Construction (SCC 2311030000): 2002 emissions data replaced data in 

preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI. 

• Open Burning of Land Clearing Debris (SCC 2610000500): 2002 emissions data 

replaced data in preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI. 

The activity for this category was based on activity prepared for the non-residential 

and highway construction categories. For 2002, emissions were set to zero for 

counties with a population that was 80% urban or more based on 2000 Census data. 

This was not done for the 1999 NEI. For the NEI method, it was assumed that 

highly urban counties do not allow this activity to take place. Note that 2002 

emissions data were already included in the preliminary 2002 NEI for the open 

burning of residential municipal solid waste, open burning of yard waste, and the 

residential construction categories. 

• Residential LPG Combustion (SCC 2104007000): 2000 emissions data replaced 

data in the preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI. 

• Residential Kerosene Combustion (SCC 2104011000): 2000 emissions data 

replaced data in the preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 

NEI. 

• Residential Wood Combustion (SCCs starting with 2104008xxx; 4 SCCs for 

fireplaces and 3 SCCs for woodstoves): The preliminary 2002 NEI emissions were 

revised to: 
51

• Correct the CO, PM10-PRI, and PM25-PRI emission factors for fireplaces 

without inserts (this change doubled the emission factors associated with 

correcting an error in converting the values from g/kg to lb/ton); 

• Correct the climate zone map for allocating national activity to States; 

• Replace 1997 total residential wood consumption with 2001 estimates (this 

change reduced wood consumption for fireplaces with inserts and 

woodstoves); 

• Update urban/rural population data to reflect 2002 estimates based on year 

2002 total county population and year 2000 county ratios of urban/rural 

population to total population; and 

• Change the data source code from E-02-X (this was incorrect) to E-01-X to 

reflect 2001 activity data adjusted to 2002. 

e. QA Review of Final Inventory 

Final QA checks were run on the revised data set to ensure that all corrections provided by the 

State agencies were incorporated into the State inventories and that there were no remaining QA 

issues that could be addressed during the duration of the project. After exporting the inventory 

in Oracle to an Access database in NIF 3.0, the EPA’s QA program was run on the Access 

database and the QA output was reviewed to verify that all QA issues that could be addressed 

were resolved (EPA, 2004a). 

The output file from the EPA’s QA program run on the area source inventory is provided 

in an Access 2000 database along with the Access database containing the area source inventory 

in NIF 3.0. 

Additional Work on Area Source Methods

• Fugitive Dust Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads 

Review of Methods 

This work involved compiling and summarizing information on emission estimation methods 

and data sources from the MANE-VU State agencies, RPOs, and EPA for the following fugitive 

dust area source categories: windblown dust, paved and unpaved roads, agricultural tiling and 

harvesting, and construction activities. A short survey form was prepared and sent to the 

MANE-VU State agencies to collect information on whether an agency had activity for each 

category during 2002. For each agency for which activity occurred in its jurisdiction during 

2002, information was requested on the methods and data sources it used to prepare its 2002 

inventory for each category. This information was used to prioritize the categories (e.g., work on 

agricultural field burning was eliminated from further consideration if MANE-VU State agencies 
52

did not have activity for this category). The methods and data applied by RPOs other than 

MANE-VU were obtained from RPO websites and discussions with the RPOs. 

The results of this review were documented in a technical memorandum (MANE-VU, 2004b). 

Based on the results of the review, MANE-VU decided to proceed with developing a paved and 

unpaved road fugitive dust inventory that incorporated improvements to activity data used in the 

NEI methodology. 

Methods for Improving Paved and Unpaved Road Fugitive Dust Inventory 

Fugitive dust emissions from paved and unpaved roads are classified under SCCs 2294000000 

and 2296000000, respectively. Fugitive dust emissions from paved and unpaved road traffic 

were estimated for PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL. Since these categories 

are not sources of PM-CON, PM10-PRI emissions are equal to PM10-FIL emissions and PM25-

PRI emissions are equal to PM25-FIL. The following provides a summary of the methods. 

Paved Roads 

Several changes were made in the paved road fugitive dust emission calculations to improve 

these estimates over those prepared for EPA’s 2002 NEI. First, the monthly precipitation data 

representing the number of days in a month with at least 0.01 inches of precipitation were 

developed at the county level. In comparison, a single monthly precipitation value was used to 

model an entire State in the 2002 NEI. Thus, the resulting MANE-VU county-specific paved 

road fugitive dust emission estimates should be more representative of each county than the NEI 

data since precipitation events can vary significantly from one part of the State to another. 

The second improvement made to the paved road fugitive dust emission calculations was the use 

of county and road-type-specific average vehicle weights. This is an improvement over the NEI 

where a single average vehicle weight is applied nationwide. Thus, in the MANE-VU inventory, 

county/road type combinations with significant heavy truck traffic have a higher average vehicle 

weight and a corresponding emission factor compared to county/road type combinations with 

primarily lighter vehicle traffic. 

The final improvement made to the MANE-VU paved road emission calculations was the use of 

the winter silt loading adjustments. These adjustments account for the application of sand and 

salt on the roads during months with frozen precipitation. The 2002 NEI does not include any 

wintertime silt loading adjustments. The effect of the wintertime silt loading adjustments is an 

increase in the paved road emission factors during the months in which it is applied. The months 

during which this adjustment was applied varied by State in the MANE-VU inventory. 

Unpaved Roads 

The county-specific precipitation data used in the paved road fugitive dust calculations were also 

used to improve the unpaved road fugitive dust calculations. As with the paved roads, this 

represents an improvement over the State-specific precipitation data used in the 2002 NEI 
53

unpaved road emission inventory. The other improvement made to the unpaved roads was the 

use of State-supplied unpaved road mileage data by county for Maine. 

• Wildfires and Prescribed Burning 

Review of Methods 

This work involved compiling and summarizing information on emission estimation methods 

and data sources from the MANE-VU State agencies, RPOs, and EPA for the following area 

source categories: wildfires, prescribed burning, slash burning, and agricultural field burning. 

The approach previously described for the fugitive dust categories was used to collect and 

compile data from the MANE-VU State agencies, RPOs other than MANE-VU, and EPA for the 

fire categories. All of the information collected from these various information sources was 

summarized in a technical memorandum (MANE-VU, 2004c). 

Results of Methods Review 

MANE-VU recognized the need to improve the methods for estimating emissions for the fire 

categories. The most important revision would be to inventory fire events as point sources rather 

than as area sources at the county-level. However, due to resource constraints, it was decided 

not to pursue improvements to the methods for estimating emissions from the fire categories. It 

should be noted that during this project, some of the MANE-VU States provided revisions to 

their wildfire and prescribed burning inventories to add PM25-PRI emissions and to improve the 

spatial allocation of activity data at the county level. These improvements were incorporated 

into the MANE-VU area source inventory. 

3. Version 3 Revisions 

The following explains revisions to Version 3 that applied to several or all of the MANE-VU 

States. 

Gap Filling

In Version 2 of MANE-VU’s inventory, emissions for PFCs, industrial adhesives, and residential 

outdoor wood burning existed for some States but were missing for other States. Since these are 

categories for which SIP rules may be developed, it was determined that emissions for these 

categories should be added to Version 3. The following provides a summary of the Version 3 

revisions to address missing data concerns for these categories: 

• PFCs: MANE-VU estimated default 2002 emissions for these States using a per capita 

emission factor and county population data for each State. The derivation of the emission 

factor, population data, and calculation of annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs is 

provided in an Excel file named “PFC_Adhesive Calcs for 2002_022106.xls” along with 

this TSD. 
54

Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont elected 

to use MANE-VU’s default inventory which was added to Version 3. Massachusetts 

elected to use the per capita emission factor but provided revisions to the population data, 

used 2002 owner occupied units to allocate the emissions to counties, and then allocated 

emissions between the commercial (16%) and residential (84%) sectors. Massachusetts’ 

calculations are provided in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel 

file named MA_AR_QA_Report_030806.xls" provided with this TSD. 

• Industrial Adhesives: Emissions for industrial adhesives were missing in Version 2 for 

Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Rhode 

Island. MANE-VU estimated default 2002 emissions for these States using a per capita 

emission factor and county population data for each State. The derivation of the emission 

factor, population data, and calculation of annual and daily VOC emissions for industrial 

adhesives is provided in an Excel file named “PFC_Adhesive Calcs for 

2002_022106.xls” along with this TWD. 

Massachusetts elected to use MANE-VU’s gap-filling inventory which was added to 

Version 3. The rest of the States elected to use EPA’s 2002 inventory which is based on 

a top-down, mass balance methodology where national industrial adhesive solvent 

estimates were allocated to counties using industrial employment. The EPA estimates 

were adjusted to remove uncontrolled VOC emissions included in the final 2002 point 

source NEI. The point-source adjustments were conducted at the county level. Note that 

the point-source-adjusted emissions for Rhode Island are zero for all three counties. 

Note New Jersey is the only State that prepared its own 2002 inventory for this category 

that is included in Version 3. The industrial adhesive inventory data for the rest of the 

MANE-VU States originates from the 1999 NEI. These States were contacted to 

determine if they wanted the 1999 data replaced with the default estimates or with the 

EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives. Maine commented that the 1999 

estimates are more realistic of the solvent emissions for their State than the 2002 NEI or 

MANE-VU default estimates. The other States did not indicate that they wanted their 

data replaced. Therefore, the 1999 NEI data for Maine, New Hampshire, New York, 

Pennsylvania, and Vermont was not changed in Version 3 of MANE-VU’s inventory. 

• Residential Wood Burning: Residential outdoor wood burning emissions were missing in 

Version 2 of the MANE-VU inventory for the District of Columbia, Pennsylvania, Rhode 

Island, and Vermont. In Versions 1 and 2, New Jersey’s and New York’s emissions for 

outdoor wood burning were included with their inventory for indoor wood burning. The 

District of Columbia, Rhode Island, and Vermont elected to use MANE-VU’s outdoor 

wood burning inventory which was added to Version 3. In addition, per direction 

provided by New Jersey, its wood burning inventory was replaced with the MANE-VUsponsored indoor wood burning inventory in Version 3, and the MANE-VU outdoor 

wood burning inventory was added to Version 3. 
55

New York’s inventory in Version 2 included emissions for both residential indoor and 

outdoor wood burning. For Version 3, New York provided revisions that lowered its 

overall emissions relative to Version 2 and broke out its inventory to show emissions for 

fireplaces, woodstoves, and outdoor equipment separately. New York also added NH3

emissions to its inventory for Version 3. 

Adjustments to PM2.5 Emissions for Fugitive Dust Categories

Information developed by the Western Governors’ Association, Western Regional Air 

Partnership (WRAP) Dust Emissions Joint Forum and EPA indicates that, for paved and unpaved 

roads and the construction nonpoint source categories, the PM2.5-to-PM10 ratio is lower than the 

ratio used in the EPA method to estimate PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions from PM10-PRI/-FIL 

emissions (WRAP, 2005). Therefore, for the final 2002 NEI, EPA applied an adjustment factor 

to the PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions to correct for overestimates of PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions for 

these categories. Because the PM2.5-to-PM10 ratio used for the MANE-VU States is based on the 

EPA method, this information was communicated to the MANE-VU States and all of the States 

agreed that these adjustments should be made to the MANE-VU inventory. Table III-4 identifies 

the categories to which this adjustment was applied, the old and new PM2.5-to-PM10 ratios, and 

the adjustment factors applied to the PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions in Version 3 of MANE-VU’s 

inventory. Note that these adjustments to PM2.5 emissions were applied prior to applying the 

transport adjustment factors for PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. The modelers applied the transport 

adjustment factors to the mass emissions in Version 3. Documentation of the file containing the 

transport adjustment factors is provided under “Speciation Profiles” section of Table VII-1 in 

Chapter VII. 

For the construction categories, the EPA assumed an original PM2.5-to-PM10 ratio of 0.15 and an 

adjustment factor of 0.67. However, the original PM2.5-to-PM10 ratio used for both the NEI 

method and MANE-VU's inventory for construction is 0.2. Based on discussions with EPA, the 

goal is to revise the original PM2.5 emissions such that the PM2.5-to-PM10 ratio is 0.1. Therefore, 

for Version 3 of MANE-VU's 2002 area source inventory, an adjustment factor of 0.5 (ratio of 

0.1-to-0.2) was applied to adjust the PM2.5 emissions. 

Note that based on Pechan’s discussions with EPA during the week of March 6, 2006 concerning 

the application of the paved road PM2.5 adjustment factor, it was determined that adjusting the 

emissions by applying the factor (shown in Table III-4) to the PM2.5 emissions is a simplistic 

approach. The EPA noted that it is evaluating this issue and will be issuing guidance in the near 

future for revising the equation for estimating PM2.5 emissions which, when applied, will likely 

yield different results. Because EPA was unable to provide guidance on how to address this 

issue before Version 3 needed to be completed during the week of March 6, the adjustment 

factor shown in Table III-4 was applied to the PM2.5 emissions for paved roads because this 

adjustment will provide a better estimate of PM2.5 emissions than the unadjusted emissions. 
56

Table III-4. Revisions to PM25-PRI and PM25-FIL Emissions for Paved and 

Unpaved Roads and Construction 

SCC SCC Description 

Original 

PM2.5-to-PM10

Ratio 

Revised 

PM2.5-to-PM10

Ratio 

Adjustment 

Factor1,2

2294000000 Mobile Sources : Paved Roads : All Paved Roads : 

Total: Fugitives 

0.25 0.15 0.6 

2296000000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : All Unpaved 

Roads : Total: Fugitives 

0.15 0.1 0.67 

2296005000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : Public Unpaved 

Roads : Total: Fugitives 

0.15 0.1 0.67 

2296010000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : Industrial 

Unpaved Roads : Total: Fugitives 

0.15 0.1 0.67 

2311000000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : 

All Processes : Total 

0.2 0.1 0.50 

2311010000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : 

Residential : Total 

0.2 0.1 0.50 

2311010040 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : 

Residential : Ground Excavations 

0.2 0.1 0.50 

2311020000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : 

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional : Total 

0.2 0.1 0.50 

2311020040 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : 

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional : Ground 

Excavations 

0.2 0.1 0.50 

2311030000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : 

Road Construction : Total 

0.2 0.1 0.50 

1

 For these categories, filterable and primary emissions are equal because they are not sources of condensible emissions. The adjustment 

factor was applied to both the PM25-PRI and PM25-FIL emissions and emission factors in the MANE-VU inventory. 

2

 See text for discussion of issue concerning the adjustment factor for paved road PM2.5 emissions. Also, for construction, see text for 

explanation of PM2.5 adjustment factor shown in this table. 

Removal of Invalid CE Records

For the following SCCs, Version 2 contained invalid CE records for Connecticut, the District of 

Columbia, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont that 

were removed in Version 3: 

SCC SCC Description

2311020000 Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : Industrial/Commercial/Institutional : Total 

2311030000 Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : Road Construction : Total 

2610000100 Open Burning : All Categories : Yard Waste - Leaf Species Unspecified 

2610000400 Open Burning : All Categories : Yard Waste - Brush Species Unspecified 

2610030000 Open Burning : Residential : Household Waste 

The CE records all originate from the preliminary 2002 NEI that have been removed from the 

final 2002 nonpoint NEI. They are invalid because they have a control efficiency value of 100% 

and corresponding records in the EM table with rule effectiveness and rule penetration values of 

100% (implying that the emissions are zero), but with emissions greater than zero. The Excel 

spreadsheet file named “CE_records_removed from V3.xls” provides the CE records by State 

and county FIPS, SCC, and pollutant code that were removed in Version 3. 
57

4. Version 3 Emissions Summary 

Table III-5 presents a State-level summary of the annual area source emissions in Version 3 of 

the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. Note that PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions are included in 

the inventory for all SCCs for which State agencies reported any form of PM, PM10, and/or PM2.5

emissions. If an agency did not report PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI but reported PM-PRI, PMFIL, PM-CON, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL, the PM augmentation procedures discussed in the 

TSD were applied to the form of PM emissions supplied by the agency to calculate emissions for 

the other forms of PM emissions. If an agency reported PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI emissions 

but not PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, or PM-CON emissions, the agency's inventory was not 

augmented to calculate filterable or condensible emissions. Note that PM-CON is associated 

with only fuel combustion sources. 

For NH3, the area source inventory includes emissions for natural sources for the following 

States: SCCs 28060xxxxx for domestic cats and dogs in Delaware, Massachusetts, and New 

Jersey; 28070xxxxx for wild animals in Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York; 

and SCC 2810010000 for human perspiration in Delaware, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. 

The area source inventory also includes NH3 biogenic emissions (SCC 2701420000) for 

Massachusetts. 

Table III-5. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Area Source Emissions by State (Tons/Year) 

State CO NH3 NOx PM10-FIL 

PM10-

PRI 

PM25-

FIL 

PM25-

PRI 

PMCON SO2 VOC 

Connecticut 70,198 5,318 12,689 37,790 48,281 4,038 14,247 846 12,418 87,302 

Delaware 14,052 13,279 2,608 12,910 13,039 3,075 3,204 128 1,588 15,519 

District of 

Columbia 2,300 14 1,644 5,745 6,293 507 1,029 147 1,337 6,432 

Maine 109,223 8,747 7,360 155,237 168,953 19,090 32,774 686 13,149 100,621 

Maryland 141,178 25,834 15,678 31,116 95,060 3,375 27,318 611 12,393 120,254 

Massachusetts 136,552 18,809 31,358 150,046 192,839 23,354 42,067 1,156 54,923 162,016 

New 

Hampshire 79,647 2,158 10,960 32,138 43,328 6,688 17,532 449 7,072 65,370 

New Jersey 97,657 17,572 26,692 37,282 61,601 2,811 19,350 476 10,744 167,882 

New York 356,254 67,422 98,803 288,991 369,595 30,894 87,154 102 130,409 507,292 

Pennsylvania 266,935 79,911 47,591 363,173 391,897 51,792 74,925 266 63,679 240,785 

Rhode Island 8,007 883 3,886 7,090 8,295 887 2,064 336 4,557 31,402 

Vermont 43,849 9,848 3,208 51,392 56,131 6,729 11,065 180 4,087 23,265 

MANE-VU 1,325,853 249,795 262,477 1,172,909 1,455,311 153,243 332,729 5,383 316,357 1,528,141 
58

B. State-Specific Methods 

For each of the MANE-VU States, this section identifies the temporal basis of the emissions 

included in Version 3 and discusses revisions incorporated into Version 3. In addition, this 

section also discusses the origin of each State agency’s emissions included in Version 3. For 

each agency, a table is provided in Appendix B that lists the data source codes by SCC, emission 

type period, and pollutant. In addition, an electronic folder is provided for each State agency 

containing the QA Summary Reports prepared for Versions 1, 2, and/or 3 and other files 

documenting revisions included in Versions 2 and 3. Except for Rhode Island, a QA Summary 

Report was prepared for Version 1. Subsequently, a QA Summary Report was prepared for 

States that provided Version 2 or 3 revisions. Rhode Island elected to use EPA’s draft 2002 NEI 

for Versions 1 and 2 but provided revisions for Version 3; therefore, a QA Summary Report is 

available for Version 3 only for Rhode Island. 

1. Connecticut 

Table III-6 shows the emission type periods for which Connecticut provided emissions. 

Table III-6. Connecticut 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

Table B-1 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

Connecticut provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3. 

Connecticut elected to use the EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives. Connecticut 

elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source categories: 

• Annual and daily VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

indoor and outdoor residential wood combustion; 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and 

unpaved roads; 

• Annual and daily NH3 emissions for industrial refrigeration processes; 

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs; and 

• Annual and daily VOC and NH3 emissions for composting. 

Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI. For 

Connecticut, these emissions are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or carried forward 
59

from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI. Data carried forward from the 1999 NEI originate from 

either State data included in the 1999 NEI or EPA data developed for the 1999 NEI. 

2. Delaware 

Table III-7 shows the emission type periods for which Delaware provided emissions. 

Table III-7. Delaware 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20020831 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20020101 20020831 27 

ANNUAL 20020512 20020512 30 DAILY 20020512 20020512 27 

ANNUAL 20020629 20020629 30 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 

ANNUAL 20021029 20021029 30 DAILY 20020629 20020629 27 

ANNUAL 20021104 20021104 30 DAILY 20021029 20021029 27 

ANNUAL 20021205 20021205 30 DAILY 20021104 20021104 27 

 DAILY 20021205 20021205 27 

Table B-2 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

Delaware provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3, 

and used 2002 data that EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI or MANE-VU-sponsored 

inventories for the remaining categories. Delaware elected to use the EPA’s 2002 inventory for 

industrial adhesives, and prepared its own inventory for PFCs. Delaware elected to use data 

from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source categories: 

 

• Annual and daily VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

indoor and outdoor wood burning; 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved roads 

(note: there are no unpaved roads in Delaware); 

• Annual and daily NH3 emissions for POTWs; and 

• Annual VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO2

emissions for open burning categories. 
60

3. District of Columbia 

Table III-8 shows the emission type periods for which the District of Columbia provided 

emissions. 

Table III-8. District of Columbia 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 

Table B-3 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

The District of Columbia provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories 

in Version 3. The District of Columbia provided annual VOC emissions for PFCs for Version 2 

that were kept in Version 3. The District of Columbia elected to use the EPA’s 2002 inventory 

for industrial adhesives and indoor wood burning. The exception is for the following categories 

for which the District of Columbia elected to use data from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories: 

• Annual and daily VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

outdoor wood burning; 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved roads 

(note: there are no unpaved roads in the District of Columbia); 

• Annual and daily VOC and NH3 emissions for composting; and 

• Annual VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for open burning 

categories. 

4. Maine 

Table III-9 shows the emission type periods for which Maine provided emissions. 

Table III-9. Maine 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

DAILY 20020601 20020929 29 
61

Table B-4 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because 

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. 

Maine provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3. Maine’s 

inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. Maine provided annual and 

daily VOC and annual NH3 emissions for industrial wastewater treatment that were added to 

Version 3. Maine elected to use data from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following 

source categories: 

• Annual and daily VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

indoor and outdoor wood burning; 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and 

unpaved roads; 

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs; and 

• Annual and daily VOC and NH3 emissions for composting. 

5. Maryland 

Table III-10 shows the emission type periods for which Maryland provided emissions. Table B5 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the 

Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Table III-10. Maryland 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30 

SEASONAL 20020401 20020930 30 MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30 

SEASONAL 20020401 20021031 30 MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30 

SEASONAL 20020601 20020831 30 MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30 

DAILY 20020101 20021231 29 MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30 

DAILY 20020401 20020930 29 MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30 

DAILY 20020401 20021031 29 MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30 

 MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30 

 MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30 

Maryland provided 2002 annual, seasonal, and daily emissions for the majority of the area source 

categories in Version 3 and used 2002 data that EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI for 

industrial adhesives and commercial cooking. Maryland prepared its own inventory for PFCs. 

Maryland elected to use data from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source 

categories: 
62

 

• Annual and daily VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

indoor and outdoor wood burning; 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and 

unpaved roads; 

• Annual VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO2

emissions for open burning categories; and 

• Annual and monthly NH3 emissions for agricultural crop fertilizers. 

For Version 2, Maryland provided revisions to annual, seasonal, and daily VOC emissions for 

SCC 2505030120 (Storage and Transport : Petroleum and Petroleum Product Transport : Truck : 

Gasoline). Maryland also removed PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL annual, seasonal, and daily 

records for open burning of land clearing debris (SCC 2610000500). Maryland had revised the 

PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions in an earlier version of the MANE-VU inventory but not 

the PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL. As a result of revising the primary emissions, the filterable 

emissions were no longer met the consistency check as compared to the primary emissions. 

QA of PM emissions in Version 3 identified one record for Maryland in county 510 for SCC 

2801000003 (Agriculture - Crops : Tilling) where PM10-PRI annual emissions are 2317.2 tons 

and PM25-PRI annual emissions are 0 tons. For the other counties in Maryland with this SCC, 

PM25-PRI emissions are about 20% of the PM10-PRI emissions. This issue was not addressed 

due to time and resource constraints for completing revisions to Version 3. 

6. Massachusetts 

Table III-11 shows the emission type periods for which Massachusetts provided emissions. 

Table III-11. Massachusetts 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

Table B-6 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

Massachusetts provided 2002 annual and daily emissions for the majority of the area source 

categories in Version 3 and used 2002 data that EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI for 

residential coal combustion, asphalt roofing, and agricultural livestock (NH3). 
63

Massachusetts elected to use data from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following 

source categories: 

 

• Annual and daily VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

indoor and outdoor wood burning; 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and 

unpaved roads; 

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for industrial adhesives and PFCs; 

• Annual and daily NH3 emissions for industrial refrigeration processes; 

• Annual and daily VOC and NH3 emissions for composting; and 

• Annual VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO2

emissions for open burning categories. 

For Version 2, Massachusetts revised annual and summer day VOC emissions for 14 counties for 

the following categories: aircraft refueling, surface coating, degreasing, miscellaneous nonindustrial: consumer and commercial products and pesticides, and gasoline service stations (stage 

1: balanced submerged fill). Massachusetts also revised annual and daily emissions for 14 

counties for forest wildfires, revised annual emissions for four counties for residential open 

burning of brush using the correct rule penetration factors for the counties, and revised control 

efficiency and control device data for selected categories in the CE table. 

For Version 3, Massachusetts revised annual and summer day VOC emissions for 14 counties for 

auto refinishing. In the CE table, Massachusetts changed control device code 102 (low-solvent 

coatings) to 000 (uncontrolled) and associated control efficiency values were set to null for all 

counties. Massachusetts also added annual and summer day VOC emissions for 14 counties for 

gasoline service stations (stage 2: displacement loss/controlled). 

For PFCs, Massachusetts elected to use the per capita emission factor but provided revisions to 

the population data, used 2002 owner occupied units to allocate the emissions to counties, and 

then allocated emissions between the commercial (16%) and residential (84%) sectors. 

Massachusetts’ calculations are provided in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the 

Excel file named MA_AR_QA_Report_030806.xls". 

7. New Hampshire 

Table III-12 shows the emission type periods for which New Hampshire provided emissions. 

Table B-7 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

New Hampshire provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3. 

New Hampshire’s inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. 
64

Table III-12. New Hampshire 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30 

MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30 

MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30 

MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30 

MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30 

MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30 

MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30 

MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30 

MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30 

MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30 

MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30 

MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30 

New Hampshire elected to use data from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following 

source categories: 

 

• Annual and daily VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

indoor and outdoor wood burning; 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and 

unpaved roads; 

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs; 

• Annual and daily NH3 emissions for industrial refrigeration processes and POTWs; 

• Annual and daily VOC and NH3 emissions for composting; 

• Annual VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for open burning 

categories; and 

• Annual and monthly NH3 emissions for agricultural crop fertilizers and livestock. 

Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI; these 

emissions are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forward from final 

Version 3 of the 1999 NEI. 

New Hampshire provided revisions to Version 2 that were kept in Version 3. For Version 2, 

New Hampshire revised annual and daily VOC emissions for the gasoline storage and transport 

sector to reflect revisions it made to the 2002 inventory that EPA prepared for the 2002 NEI. 

The categories revised include bulk plant breathing losses, gasoline service stations (stages 1 and 

2 total and underground tank breathing and emptying losses), and gasoline tank trucks. 
65

8. New Jersey 

Table III-13 shows the emission type periods for which New Jersey provided emissions. 

Table III-13. New Jersey 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period Start Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 29 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

Table B-8 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant 

in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. 

New Jersey provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories. New Jersey 

provided its own 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives and PFCs. Emissions for the remaining 

area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data 

prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANEVU-sponsored inventories. New Jersey elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the 

following source categories: 

• Annual and daily VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

indoor and outdoor residential wood combustion (replacing New Jersey’s indoor 

residential wood combustion inventory provided in Versions 1 and 2); 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved roads; 

• Annual and daily NH3 emissions for industrial refrigeration processes and POTWs; and 

• Annual and daily VOC and NH3 emissions for composting. 

For Version 3, New Jersey added annual and summer day VOC emissions for 21 counties for 

SCC 2501060100 (gasoline service stations : stage 2: total). The emissions are summarized in 

the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named "NJ_AR_QA_Report_ 

030806.xls". New Jersey provided 2002 emissions data for the industrial adhesives and PFC 

categories in Version 1. For Version 2, New Jersey corrected PM25-PRI emissions that were 

greater than PM10-PRI emissions for SCC 2601000000 (on-site incineration : all categories : 

total). 

9. New York 

Table III-14 shows the emission type periods for which New York provided emissions. Table B9 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the 

Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note 

that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once because the 

data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination or 
66

because emissions are not reported for all pollutants for the same SCC and emission type period 

combination. 

Table III-14. New York 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30 

MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30 

MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30 

MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30 

MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30 

MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30 

MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30 

MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30 

MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30 

MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30 

MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30 

MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30 

New York provided revisions to annual emissions for all 62 counties for the categories and 

pollutants shown in Table III-15. This revision completely replaced the 2002 emissions that 

New York provided in Version 2. Table III-15 also identifies categories and pollutants for which 

emissions were added to Version 3 (i.e., not in Version 2). The emissions are summarized in the 

spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named 

NY_AR_QA_Report_030806.xls". 

New York’s inventory in Version 2 included emissions for both residential indoor and outdoor 

wood burning. For Version 3, New York provided revisions that lowered its overall emissions 

relative to Version 2 and broke out its inventory to show emissions for fireplaces, woodstoves, 

and outdoor equipment separately. New York also added NH3 emissions to its inventory for 

Version 3. New York’s inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. New 

York provided its own 2002 inventory for PFCs. Emissions for the remaining area source 

categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared by 

EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE-VUsponsored inventories. 

New York elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source categories: 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and 

unpaved roads; 

• Annual and daily NH3 emissions for agricultural livestock; and 

• Annual VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for open burning 

categories. 
67

A QA issue that may affect the use of the MANE-VU inventory for air quality modeling and 

revisions to the projection year inventory is the addition of SCCs 2103004001 and 2103004002 

by New York that are not in EPA’s master SCC list used by the EPA QA program. These SCCs 

are defined in Table III-15. In addition, the QA program shows SCCs for PFCs and outdoor 

wood burning as invalid because EPA has not updated the master list to include these SCCs for 

the EPA QA program. These SCCs were included in Version 2 and should have been assigned 

speaciation profiles and included in the projection year inventory prepared from Version 2. 
68

Table III-15. Summary of New York's Revisions to Version 3 of MANE-VU's Area Source 

SCC SCC Description Pollutant Type of ReRevisions to Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery : Wastewater Treatment 

2630020000 Public Owned : Total Processed VOC Revised em

Revisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Residential : Wood 

2104008001 Fireplaces: General VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added NH3

of pollutants 

2104008052 Non-catalytic Woodstoves: Low Emitting VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emis2104008070 Outdoor Wood Burning Equipment VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emis

Revisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Electric Utility 

2101001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change 2101002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2101004000 Distillate Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2101005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2101006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em

Revisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Industrial 

2102001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change 2102002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2102004000 Distillate Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2102005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2102006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2102007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2102008000 Wood : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change 2102011000 Kerosene : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emis

Revisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Commercial/Institutional 

2103001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change 2103002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2103005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2103004000 Residual Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Removed a

SCCs 2103

2103004001 Distillate Oil : Boilers VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emis2103004002 Distillate Oil : IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emis2103006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2103007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2103008000 Wood : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2103011000 Kerosene : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emis
69

Table III-15. Summary of New York's Revisions to Version 3 of MANE-VU's Area Source Inven

SCC SCC Description Pollutant Type of ReRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Residential 

2104001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change 2104002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2104004000 Distillate Oil : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2104006010 Natural Gas : Residential Furnaces VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2104007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised em2104011000 Kerosene : Total: All Heater Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emis
70

10. Pennsylvania 

Table III-16 shows the emission type periods for which Pennsylvania provided emissions. 

Table III-16. Pennsylvania 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30 

 MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30 

 MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30 

 MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30 

 MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30 

 MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30 

 MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30 

 MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30 

 MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30 

 MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30 

Table B-10 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and 

pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties 

by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combinations are listed more than once 

because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period 

combination. Pennsylvania provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source 

categories. Pennsylvania provided its own 2002 inventory for PFCs and residential indoor wood 

burning. Pennsylvania’s inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. 

Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are 

either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of 

the 1999 NEI) or MANE-VU-sponsored inventories. 

Pennsylvania elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source 

categories: 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and 

unpaved roads; 

• Annual and daily NH3 emissions for industrial refrigeration processes and agricultural crop 

fertilizers and livestock; 

• Annual and daily VOC and NH3 emissions for POTWs and composting; and 

• Annual VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for open burning 

categories. 
71

11. Rhode Island 

Table III-17 shows the emission type periods for which Rhode Island provided emissions. 

Table III-17. Rhode Island 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

Table B-11 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and 

pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties 

by SCC. Rhode Island provided 2002 annual VOC emissions for several solvent utilization 

categories (surface coating, degreasing, graphic arts, rubber/plastics, and industrial adhesive); 

annual and daily VOC emissions for petroleum and petroleum product storage (gasoline service 

stations and all transport types); and annual VOC emissions for POTWs. Rhode Island’s indoor 

wood burning inventory originates from the draft 2002 NEI. Emissions for the remaining area 

source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data 

prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or 

MANE-VU-sponsored inventories. 

Rhode Island elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source 

categories: 

• Annual and daily VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

outdoor wood burning; 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and 

unpaved roads; and 

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs. 
72

12. Vermont 

Table III-18 shows the emission type periods for which Vermont provided emissions. 

Table III-18. Vermont 2002 Area, Version 3: 

Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types 

Emission 

Type 

Period 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

Table B-12 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and 

pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties 

by SCC. Vermont provided 2002 annual VOC, NOx, CO, PM10-PRI or PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI 

or PM25-FIL, and SO2 emissions for residential fuel combustion (distillate oil, natural gas, LPG, 

and indoor wood burning); annual VOC emissions for gasoline service stations and breathing 

losses at bulk terminals; annual VOC, NOx, CO, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

residential open burning; annual VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, and PM25-PRI emissions for 

forest fires, and annual VOC, NOx, CO, PM10-PRI, and PM25-PRI emissions for structure fires. 

Vermont’s inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. 

For Version 2, Vermont provided revisions to EPA’s draft 2002 inventory for SCC 2501050120 

(bulk stations and terminals : breathing loss : gasoline) to incorporate the effects of vapor 

balance controls not accounted for in the EPA estimates. The revised inventory for this category 

was added to Version 2 (and kept in Version 3) that did not include this category. Control 

records were added to the NIF 3.0 CE table for the counties with vapor balance controls. In 

addition, Vermont provided emissions for three counties (i.e., county FIPS codes 50015, 50017, 

and 50019) that were not in EPA's inventory. Emissions for the remaining area source categories 

were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA 

data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE-VU-sponsored inventories. 

Vermont elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source categories: 

• Annual and daily VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2 emissions for 

outdoor wood burning; 

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and 

unpaved roads; 

• Annual and daily NH3 emissions for industrial refrigeration processes and POTWs; 

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs; 

• Annual and daily VOC and NH3 emissions for composting; and 

• Annual VOC, NOx, CO, NH3, PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO2

emissions for open burning categories. 
73

C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

This section provides a summary of potential revisions to incorporate into future versions of the 

MANE-VU area source inventory. 

All States – A coordinated effort between the State agencies should be developed to apply 

consistent methods to avoid having to apply procedures to augment inventory data to correct for 

the QA issues and fill in missing data as discussed previously in this chapter. For example, this 

will ensure that consistent methods are applied across State agencies to ensure consistent and 

accurate reporting of source categories using the same SCCs across States, PM emissions, and 

minimize other QA issues that were identified during the development of Versions 1, 2, and 3 of 

the inventory. 

For PM emissions, the State agencies should develop and apply a consistent method for 

including condensible emissions for fuel combustion sources that can be applied when the 

agencies develop their inventories. This may include compiling the emission factors for all 

forms of PM into one database, organized by SCC and control type (for filterable emissions), and 

sharing the database among the MANE-VU State agencies. Use of a consistent set of emission 

factors will help to avoid the PM consistency issues identified in Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the 

MANE-VU inventory as well as ensure that condensible emissions are included in the primary 

emissions reported in the inventory. 

State-specific suggestions are as follows: 

Delaware: Revise the residential wood combustion emissions inventory with the latest revisions 

sponsored by MARAMA. 

Rhode Island: This State felt that the area sources (from the nonpoint inventory EPA prepared) 

which they had changed to zeros in Version 3 would revert back to the Version 2 numbers which 

were from the EPA report. Rhode Island would like to see this change in the next version of the 

inventory. (Table with changes can be received upon request). 

New Jersey: 

• Why is the EPA VOC emission factor for fireplaces completely out of proportion with the 

other emission factors? The ratio of conventional wood stoves/fireplaces = 0% to 10% 

for other pollutants and is 77% for VOC. It is discussed in the Pechan Technical Memo 

#5, 9/3/03, page 19, how a study of the accuracy of the emission factors showed the VOC 

should be more like 10 to 30 lb/ton, instead of 229 lb/ton and the woodstove emission 

factors (certified) should be higher than Emission Inventory Improvement Program 

guidance. 

• The summer seasonal adjustment factors for indoor wood burning used in the model 

appear high. This combined with the very high VOC emission factor results in high 

ozone season wood burning emissions. 
74

• In general, the accuracy of the very large residential wood burning numbers, all pollutants. 

• The large fugitive dust inventory numbers don not correlate to dust found in monitors, 

even with the latest 30% to 40% reduction in paved and unpaved road emissions. 

• We need consistent guidance from the EPA for adhesives and sealants, PFC, and 

commercial cooking. 
75

CHAPTER IV – NONROAD SOURCES 

A. General Methods for all States 

This section provides an overview of the data sources and QA steps used in preparing the 2002 

nonroad sector inventory for the MANE-VU States. The nonroad sector is comprised of nonroad 

engines included in EPA’s NONROAD model, as well as other engines not modeled in 

NONROAD, including aircraft, commercial marine vessels and locomotives. 

1. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Data sources used for the various nonroad categories are described below. 

a. Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive Categories 

As a starting point, aircraft, commercial marine vessel and locomotive inventories were prepared 

using the inventories that State agencies submitted to the EPA in June 2004 as a requirement of 

the CERR. In addition, some States provided data directly to MANE-VU for use in this 

inventory that were not submitted for the CERR. 

Missing data were supplemented with estimates from EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. For the 

aircraft and commercial marine vessel source categories, the 2002 NEI CAP emissions were 

estimated by carrying over the 2001 estimates. 2001 emissions were estimated using the 

methodologies described in EPA’s Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine Vessel, 

Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components of the National Emissions Inventory (EPA, 2003b). 

The 2002 locomotive emissions were calculated using 2002 activity data and the methodologies 

described in the EPA, 2003b documentation. 

Table IV-1 provides a summary of the aircraft, commercial marine, and locomotive emission 

SCCs reported in the MANE-VU inventory. Table IV-2 provides a summary of the basis for 

these nonroad subsector emissions by State. 
76

Table IV-1. List of Unique Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive SCCs Reported by Stat

SCC SCC Description 1 SCC Description 2 SCC Description 3 SCC Description 4 2275000000 Mobile Sources Aircraft All Aircraft Types and Operations Total 2275001000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Military Aircraft Total 2275020000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Commercial Aircraft Total: All Types 2275050000 Mobile Sources Aircraft General Aviation Total 2275060000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Air Taxi Total 2275070000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Aircraft Auxiliary Power Units Total 2280000000 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial All Fuels Total, All Vessel Types 2280002000 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Total, All Vessel Types 2280002010 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Ocean-going Vessels 2280002020 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Harbor Vessels 2280002100 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Port emissions 2280002200 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Underway emissions 2280003100 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Residual Port emissions 2280003200 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Residual Underway emissions 2285000000 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment All Fuels Total 2285002000 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Total 2285002005 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Total Line Haul Locomoti2285002006 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: C2285002007 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: C2285002008 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: P2285002009 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: C2285002010 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Yard Locomotives 
77

Table IV-2. Summary of Basis for 2002 MANE-VU Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomo

Basis for Subsector of Nonroad Inventory 

FIPSST State Aircraft Commercial Marine Vessels L

09 Connecticut 2002 Preliminary NEI 2002 Preliminary NEI State supplied 10 Delaware June 2004 CERR Submittal; State 

supplied revisions in Sep 2004 

June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CE

11 District of Columbia Not supplied by State and not available 

from NEI 

2002 Preliminary NEI June 2004 CE

23 Maine State supplied in Oct 2004 State supplied in Oct 2004 State supplied 24 Maryland June 2004 CERR Submittal; State 

supplied revisions in Sep 2004 

June 2004 CERR Submittal; State supplied revisions in Oct 2004 

June 2004 CE

25 Massachusetts June 2004 CERR Submittal State-supplied for June 2004 CERR 

Submittal, with revisions as directed by State 

June 2004 CE

33 New Hampshire June 2004 CERR Submittal 2002 Preliminary NEI June 2004 CE34 New Jersey June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CE36 New York 2002 Preliminary NEI State supplied in Oct 2004 2002 Prelimina42 Pennsylvania State supplied to Pechan in June 2004 State supplied to Pechan in June 2004 State supplied 

State supplied 

44 Rhode Island State-supplied for June 2004 CERR 

Submittal, with revisions as directed by State 

State-supplied for June 2004 CERR Submittal, with revisions as directed by State 

State-supplied 

50 Vermont 2002 Preliminary NEI Not supplied by State and not available 

from NEI 

Not supplied bfrom NEI 
78

b. NONROAD Model Categories 

NONROAD model categories include equipment such as recreational marine and land-based 

vehicles, farm and construction machinery, and lawn and garden equipment. Aircraft ground 

support equipment (GSE) and rail maintenance equipment are also included in NONROAD. 

These equipment are powered by diesel, gasoline, compressed natural gas (CNG) and LPG 

engines. 

EPA released a final version of NONROAD during December 2005 called NONROAD2005 

(EPA, 2005a). To reflect the updates made to EPA’s final NONROAD model, all MANE-VU 

Version 2 NONROAD model estimates were replaced with updated NONROAD2005 emission 

estimates. 

EPA also released an updated version of its NMIM, which incorporates the final 

NONROAD2005 model. EPA’s NMIM2005 is a consolidated modeling system that 

incorporates the NONROAD and MOBILE models, along with a county database of inputs 

(EPA, 2005b). The NMIM county database contains monthly input data to reflect countyspecific fuel parameters and temperatures. Because incorporating revised monthly inputs for use 

in NMIM2005 is more efficient than preparing county-specific monthly option files needed to 

run NONROAD2005 independently, Pechan used NMIM2005 for most MANE-VU States. The 

two exceptions were for the District of Columbia and Maine due to the differences in oxygenated 

fuel inputs used for NMIM versus NONROAD. 

As a first step, Pechan compiled fuel input data available from NMIM2005 by county and by 

month for all MANE-VU states for 2002. Pechan developed a spreadsheet that summarized the 

gasoline RVP, gasoline weight percent oxygen, and gasoline and diesel sulfur content proposed 

as inputs to the updated runs. Values consistent with State-supplied MOBILE6 inputs used for 

the development of 2002 MANE-VU highway vehicle inventories were presented for use where 

they differed from NMIM. Pechan requested that States confirm the use of these data for the 

NONROAD model runs, or provide alternative inputs. 

The final county, monthly NMIM inputs provided or confirmed by the States for RVP, weight 

percent oxygen, and gasoline sulfur are presented in Appendix C, Table C-1. Pechan used 

NMIM’s 2002 default value for nonroad diesel sulfur content. This value is 2,457 parts per 

million (ppm) for land-based equipment, and 2,767 ppm for recreational marine, for all 

MANE-VU counties. 

Pechan also requested that States provide any local activity data in the format of updated 

NONROAD external data files. These include data files which specify activity parameters such 

as equipment populations, equipment annual hours of use, county allocation factors, and monthly 

allocation profiles. 

Pechan updated the NMIM county database for 2002 to add in new gasoline profiles to reflect 

the monthly and county fuel input values provided by States. Pechan also updated the NMIM 

county database to cross reference the State-supplied NONROAD data files that replaced default 
79

NONROAD2005 inputs. Pechan then ran NMIM/NONROAD2005 at the county and monthly 

level for 2002 and generated the results in NIF 3.0. 

c. NONROAD2005 Model Runs 

The majority of the model runs were performed using NMIM2005. NMIM and NONROAD 

have differences in the required format of the oxygenated fuel inputs. For NONROAD, this 

variable is required to be expressed as a composite weight percent oxygen that accounts for the 

market share and the percent oxygen of all contributing oxygenates. Since NMIM models HAP 

emissions, the volume percent and market share of each of four oxygenates must be entered as 

fuel inputs. These oxygenates include methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), ethyl tertiary butyl 

ether (ETBE), ethanol (ETOH), and tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME). In cases where only 

one known oxygenate is present, this is straightforward to reflect in NMIM, as weight percent 

can be easily converted to volume percent. However, two States (the District of Columbia and 

Maine) provided a composite weight percent value for more than one oxygenate, but could not 

provide the corresponding volume percent and market share for each oxygenate to use in NMIM. 

As such, Pechan used NONROAD2005 for both the District of Columbia and Maine so that their 

submitted values for weight percent oxygen could be used directly. The 2002 minimum, 

maximum, and average hourly temperatures included in NMIM2005 were used to calculate 

average monthly temperature inputs to NONROAD for both States. 

Pechan developed monthly NONROAD option files and ran these files through NONROAD2005 

to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 2002 inventory. 

Pechan performed additional calculations using NMIM emission factors and fuel consumption to 

calculate NH3, since NONROAD does not calculate NH3 emissions. 

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? 

The final MANE-VU nonroad inventory was comprised of emission estimates that were either: 

1) submitted by States for the June 2004 CERR submittal or as additional revisions after this 

date; 2) developed using NONROAD model inputs provided or approved by States; or 

3) reported by EPA in the preliminary 2002 NEI. As such, the QA steps were tailored to each of 

these types of submittals. Note that a Quality Assurance Plan was prepared prior to initiating 

work on Version 1 (MANE-VU, 2003). This plan was applied during development of all three 

versions of the MANE-VU inventory. 

a. Summary of QA checks for State emission submittals 

Nonroad emission submittals were accepted as part of the June 2004 CERR submittals to EPA or 

as direct submittals to MANE-VU. Upon receipt of an emissions submittal, Pechan prepared 

spreadsheets providing a unique list of errors identified by running the EPA NIF 3.0 QA 

software tool on the nonroad source inventory (EPA, 2004a). Notes were provided to identify 

the NIF 3.0 tables in which the errors appeared, as well as clarification as to where an error 

occurred (e.g., for what SCC and pollutant). For many of the errors, Pechan provided a potential 

correction, and States indicated whether they agreed with the correction, or provided their own 
80

instructions for correcting the error. These spreadsheets served to document each state's 

direction on how to correct errors and the state's representative authorizing the correction. 

The list of general QA checks include the following: 

• Duplicate records (i.e., only one record allowed for each unique county/SCC/ pollutant) 

• Invalid record type 

• Mandatory field is not populated 

• Invalid field length 

• Invalid data type (e.g., invalid SCCs or pollutants) 

• “Out-of-range” emission values 

• Referential integrity (i.e., the presence of widow or orphan records in the NIF 3.0 relational 

tables) 

 

Note that EPA’s NIF 3.0 QA software tool also checks for other specific QA issues by field not 

listed above. See EPA’s User Guide, Appendix A for a listing of all potential errors that are 

checked by the program, and EPA’s guidance for how they should be resolved. 

Pechan also performed other general QA procedures outside of EPA’s NIF 3.0 QA software tool, 

including pollutant augmentation, SCC reconciliation, and completeness and reasonableness 

checks. 

Pechan performed pollutant augmentation in cases where the complete set of CAPs and NH3 

were not provided by a State. For example, several States did not provide PM25-PRI, but did 

provide PM10-PRI, so that PM25-PRI was estimated using EPA-published particle-size 

multipliers. Where multipliers were not available from EPA documentation, Pechan used 

available pollutant emission estimates reported by all other MANE-VU States to develop 

“emission ratios” for a given SCC. These “emission ratios” were then used to multiply available 

pollutant estimates to estimate values for the missing pollutants. Specific values used for a given 

State and SCC are cited in the “State-Specific Methods” section below. 

In addition, SCC assignments were reviewed and reassigned after clarification from States as to 

what the specific SCC estimate represented. For example, a State may have reported all aircraft 

activity under one of the specific aircraft type SCCs (e.g., commercial or general aviation), when 

it should more accurately be reported under the general SCC 2275000000 (All Aircraft Types 

and Operations). 

Finally, completeness checks were performed on the inventory to determine that emissions for 

nonroad categories known to operate in a State or county were being reported. Note that 

emissions may not be reported for all NONROAD SCCs for all counties in the MANE-VU RPO, 

and will depend on the geographic allocation methods used by the model, or specific allocation 

data provided by a State. 

NONROAD model category estimates originally provided by States for the June 2004 submittal 

were replaced by emission estimates developed using NMIM/NONROAD 2005. As such, this 
81

TSD will not document corrections made by Pechan to these original NONROAD model 

estimates, since they were replaced for Version 3. 

b. Data input summary spreadsheets for State review

As mentioned above for NONROAD model categories, Pechan prepared the MANE-VU 

emission estimates using EPA’s final NMIM/NONROAD2005 model. An important QA step in 

running NONROAD is to ensure that the inputs used for fuel specifications and temperatures for 

a given county and month in 2002 are representative. As such, Pechan compiled the RVP, 

percent oxygen, and gasoline sulfur inputs reported by NMIM2005 by county and month for 

States to review. If a State had previously submitted input data for the MANE-VU onroad 

inventory, these data were proposed in lieu of NMIM data. States either confirmed use of the 

default NMIM/onroad MANE-VU inputs, or provided alternate data in the specified format to 

replace the proposed inputs. Pechan updated the gasoline table in the NMIM county database to 

add in new gasoline profiles to reflect revised fuel input values provided by States. These 

profiles were then cross-referenced to the appropriate county and month in a separate table called 

countyyearmonth. Pechan performed QA checks of these NMIM county database tables for each 

State to ensure that the correct fuel data were input by county and by month as requested by the 

State. 

c. QA of final mass emissions 

After performing QA of the inputs, Pechan ran NMIM/NONROAD2005 at the county and 

monthly level for 2002 and generated the results in NIF 3.0. As a QA step, Pechan ran EPA’s 

NIF 3.0 QA software tool on the NIF 3.0 files. Errors identified were resolved and checked to 

ensure they were corrected in the final files. 

As part of final processing of the inventories, and to assist in tracking revisions and preparing 

emission summaries, Pechan added the following NIF plus fields to each table: 

TblCE : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date 

TblEM : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date, CAP/HAP, Year, 

Emission Ton Value, Emission Type Period 

TblEP : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date 

TblPE : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date 

TblTR : State FIPS, County FIPS, Revision Date 

Data source codes are included to document the origin of the emissions data, which assists in 

tracking and quality-assuring revisions made to the emission estimates. Table IV-3 provides a 

listing of the data source codes included in the MANE-VU nonroad inventories, as well as a 

definition of each code. State FIPS and County FIPS are separated out to assist in developing 

area-specific emission summaries, and the Emission Ton Value places all emissions on the same 

basis. The Emission Type Period describes the temporal basis of the estimates (in this case, they 

are all annual). Finally, the Revision Date tracks when record-specific changes are made. 
82

Table IV-3. Data Source Code Descriptions 

Data 

Source 

Code Description 

E-02-F E = EPA-generated data; -02 = year 2002; -F = emissions are carried forward for inclusion in 

the 2002 base year 

E-02-X E = EPA-generated data; -02 = year 2002; -F = emissions are not grown or carried forward 

P-02-X P = RPO-generated data; -02 = year 2002; -X = emissions are not grown or carried forward 

S-02-X S = State data; -02 = year 2002 data; -X = emissions are not grown or carried forward 

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries 

Table IV-4 presents a summary of the annual 2002 nonroad sector pollutant emissions for each 

MANE-VU State, as well as a regional total. These emissions include SCCs for all NONROAD 

model engines, as well as aircraft, commercial marine vessel, and locomotive categories, where 

applicable, for each State. Table IV-5 presents the emission results for NONROAD model 

equipment only, while Table IV-6 provides emission estimates for aircraft, commercial marine 

vessel, and locomotive categories separately. 

Table IV-4. Annual 2002 Nonroad Sector Emissions by MANE-VU State 

(Tons/Year) 

State CO NH3 NOx PM10-PRI PM25-PRI SO2 VOC 

Connecticut 276,773.0 16.6 25,460.2 1,952.1 1,793.9 2,087.4 33,880.2 

Delaware 68,782.0 5.2 16,226.5 1,021.4 925.6 3,983.3 8,010.1 

District of Columbia 18,844.7 2.4 3,571.3 310.2 298.7 375.4 2,072.5 

Maine 153,423.6 11.4 9,820.4 1,436.8 1,329.4 916.8 31,144.1 

Maryland 437,400.3 28.2 37,472.2 4,936.0 4,357.1 7,941.6 56,330.4 

Massachusetts 461,514.3 28.2 42,768.5 3,531.2 3,226.4 3,791.2 56,748.5 

New Hampshire 130,782.2 9.1 9,912.1 1,057.8 965.4 891.0 22,376.5 

New Jersey 704,396.4 43.0 63,479.0 5,495.1 4,997.2 15,686.0 83,918.9 

New York 1,233,968.3 79.3 109,878.3 9,605.3 8,820.9 12,919.7 157,611.7 

Pennsylvania 931,978.0 55.0 103,824.2 9,737.9 8,440.1 7,915.0 102,331.0 

Rhode Island 73,012.7 4.1 5,001.5 500.2 443.1 377.2 7,779.7 

Vermont 62,248.1 4.5 4,217.1 529.9 485.8 372.1 10,547.6 

Total MANE-VU 4,553,123.5 286.9 431,631.3 40,113.9 36,083.6 57,256.6 572,751.3 
83

Table IV-5. Annual 2002 NONROAD2005 Model Emissions by MANE-VU State 

(Tons/Year) 

State CO NH3 NOx PM10-PRI PM25-PRI SO2 VOC 

Connecticut 274,387.6 16.6 17,897.0 1,712.9 1,577.6 1,376.6 33,519.0 

Delaware 65,954.1 4.9 5,798.3 570.4 525.1 513.0 7,530.5 

District of Columbia 18,774.9 2.4 3,066.4 298.4 287.8 341.3 2,052.9 

Maine 148,555.3 11.4 8,228.9 1,204.2 1,135.1 771.8 30,741.0 

Maryland 424,776.8 28.2 27,789.1 3,118.7 2,870.4 2,569.2 53,035.0 

Massachusetts 448,398.7 28.2 30,046.7 2,887.2 2,658.8 2,428.1 54,835.8 

New Hampshire 128,571.5 9.1 8,149.5 946.8 871.7 672.7 22,237.8 

New Jersey 692,547.9 43.0 43,515.2 4,285.4 3,950.5 3,524.9 81,900.4 

New York 1,219,308.7 79.3 78,648.3 8,338.9 7,677.1 6,966.3 155,475.1 

Pennsylvania 903,167.7 55.0 62,265.2 6,281.5 5,784.3 5,292.4 99,240.9 

Rhode Island 71,573.1 4.1 4,563.9 402.8 371.1 335.5 7,698.7 

Vermont 61,732.1 4.5 4,169.9 517.6 476.6 367.6 10,520.4 

Total MANE-VU 4,457,748.6 286.6 294,138.2 30,564.8 28,186.1 25,159.4 558,787.4 

Table IV-6. Annual 2002 Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and 

Locomotive Emissions by MANE-VU State 

(Tons/Year) 

State CO NH3 NOx PM10-PRI PM25-PRI SO2 VOC 

Connecticut 2,385.4 0.0 7,563.2 239.2 216.4 710.8 361.2 

Delaware 2,827.9 0.3 10,428.2 451.1 400.5 3,470.3 479.6 

District of Columbia 69.7 0.0 505.0 11.8 10.9 34.1 19.7 

Maine 4,868.3 0.0 1,591.5 232.6 194.3 145.0 403.1 

Maryland 12,623.5 0.0 9,683.2 1,817.3 1,486.7 5,372.3 3,295.4 

Massachusetts 13,115.6 0.0 12,721.7 644.0 567.6 1,363.1 1,912.7 

New Hampshire 2,210.7 0.0 1,762.5 111.0 93.7 218.3 138.6 

New Jersey 11,848.5 0.0 19,963.9 1,209.7 1,046.7 12,161.1 2,018.6 

New York 14,659.6 0.0 31,230.0 1,266.4 1,143.8 5,953.4 2,136.6 

Pennsylvania 28,810.2 0.0 41,559.0 3,456.4 2,655.8 2,622.7 3,090.2 

Rhode Island 1,439.6 0.0 437.6 97.4 72.1 41.7 81.0 

Vermont 516.0 0.0 47.3 12.2 9.2 4.5 27.2 

Total MANE-VU 95,374.9 0.3 137,493.1 9,549.1 7,897.4 32,097.3 13,963.9 
84

B. State-Specific Methods 

The following sections describe the methods used and QA issues addressed for each MANE-VU 

State in developing Version 3.0 of MANE-VU’s nonroad sector inventory. 

1. Connecticut 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan ran EPA’s NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Pechan 

incorporated Connecticut-supplied data for gasoline sulfur content and RVP into the NMIM 

database. Pechan used NMIM defaults for diesel sulfur content and for weight percent 

oxygenate values. The final input data by county and by month are summarized in Table B-1. 

Aircraft and commercial marine vessel emissions are based on the preliminary 2002 nonroad 

NEI. In March 2006, Connecticut provided county-level emission estimates for VOC, NOx, and 

CO for all line-haul and switchyard locomotive SCCs. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

For commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000), PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were not reported in the 

EPA’s NEI. For completeness, Pechan estimated PM10-PRI emissions by applying an average 

PM10-PRI/NOx emission ratio of 0.058 to available NOx emissions. Commercial aircraft PM25-

PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier 

of 0.976 (ERG, 2004). 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

Because EPA’s NEI does not include locomotive category emission estimates for Connecticut, 

and since Connecticut only provided emission estimates for VOC, NOx, and CO, estimates are 

still missing for PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO2. 

2. Delaware 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Delaware 

approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. The final fuel input data by county and by 

month are summarized in Table B-1. Delaware provided updated files listed in Table IV-7 to 

replace the default files used in NMIM. These included county allocation files for five nonroad 

categories, and a revised equipment population file with updated populations for specific SCCs. 
85

Table IV-7. Delaware NONROAD External Data Files 

County NR File Name File Type 

10000air.alo County allocation for airport GSE 

10000gc.alo County allocation for golf carts 

10000hou.alo County allocation for lawn & garden 

10000log.alo County allocation for logging 

10000rvp.alo County allocation for land-based recreational 

10000.pop Equipment population 

Pechan used Delaware’s June 2004 CERR submittal as the basis for aircraft, locomotive and 

commercial marine vessel category estimates in the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. 

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? 

In September 2004, Delaware provided corrections to the general aviation emissions (SCC 

227505000) for all pollutants for Kent County to add in general aviation activity at Dover Air 

Force Base. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved by 

Delaware. Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) included emission estimates for all 

pollutants except PM25-PRI. Pechan calculated commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions using 

the assumption that 97.6% of PM10-PRI is PM25-PRI (ERG, 2004). 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

3. District of Columbia 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan developed NONROAD Model SCC emissions for District of Columbia using 

NONROAD2005. NONROAD2005 was used directly instead of NMIM2005 to incorporate 

State-supplied weight percent oxygen data. The District of Columbia also requested changes to 

the default NMIM RVP and gasoline values for some months. The final fuel input data by 

county and by month are summarized in Table B-1. 

The 2002 minimum, maximum, and average hourly temperatures included in NMIM were used 

to calculate average monthly temperature inputs to NONROAD. Pechan developed monthly 

NONROAD2005 option files for the District of Columbia. Pechan ran the option files through 

NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 

2002 inventory. Pechan performed additional calculations using NMIM emission factors and 

NONROAD2005 fuel consumption to calculate NH3, since NONROAD does not calculate NH3

emissions. NMIM reports NH3 emission factors of 116 grams NH3 per gallon gasoline for 

gasoline engines, and 83 grams NH3 per gallon fuel for diesel engines. 
86

 

The District of Columbia provided locomotive emissions for their nonroad sector June 2004 

CERR submittal. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved by the 

District of Columbia. PM emissions in the inventory were not identified as either PM10 or PM2.5, 

nor were the emissions identified as primary or filterable. The District of Columbia authorized 

Pechan to change PM to PM10-PRI. Locomotive PM25-PRI emissions were estimated using the 

assumption that 90 percent of PM10 is PM2.5 (EPA, 2003b). Hydrocarbon (HC) pollutant 

emissions were also removed from the inventory, as this is not a valid pollutant code in NIF3.0. 

Pechan added commercial marine vessel emissions from the preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI. 

There are no aircraft emission estimates in the NEI for the District of Columbia, since there are 

not airports located in the District of Columbia. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

4. Maine 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan developed NONROAD model SCC emissions using NONROAD2005. For Maine, 

weight percent oxygen values were submitted based on actual fuel survey results by county and 

by month, but Maine had not tracked the corresponding oxygenate volume percent and market 

share. As such, Pechan used NONROAD2005 so that Maine’s values for weight percent oxygen 

could be reflected. Maine also provided revisions to the RVP and gasoline sulfur values reported 

in NMIM2005. Pechan developed NONROAD2005 monthly option files for two county groups 

in Maine that shared values for all three fuel inputs (see Appendix C, Table C-1). The 2002 

minimum, maximum, and average hourly temperatures included in NMIM were used to calculate 

average monthly temperature inputs to NONROAD. Pechan ran the option files through 

NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 

2002 inventory. Pechan performed additional calculations using NMIM emission factors and 

fuel consumption to calculate NH3, since NONROAD does not calculate NH3 emissions. NMIM 

reports NH3 emission factors of 116 grams NH3 per gallon gasoline for gasoline engines, and 83 

grams NH3 per gallon fuel for diesel engines. 
87

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? 

In October 2004, Maine provided aircraft, commercial marine vessel, and locomotive SCC 

emissions to be added to their inventory. Commercial marine emissions submitted by Maine 

only represented in-port emissions. Diesel and residual commercial marine underway emissions 

(SCCs 2280002200 and 2280003200) were based on EPA’s 2002 preliminary NEI. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

PM25-PRI estimates were missing from all aircraft SCC records provided by Maine. Pechan 

estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying 

PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). Commercial aircraft 

PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size 

multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004). In-port commercial marine emissions (SCC 2280002100) were 

missing estimates for PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI. Pechan estimated PM10-PRI emissions by 

applying a PM10-PRI/NOx emission ratio of 0.042 to available NOx emissions. PM25-PRI 

emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 

0.92 (EPA, 2003b). 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

 

None identified by the State. 

5. Maryland 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan used NMIM2005 to prepare NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Maryland 

reviewed the default NMIM inputs and provided revisions to the input values for RVP and 

weight percent oxygen for all months. Maryland requested that a value of 2.1 percent oxygen be 

used for all counties and months. This weight percent value was then converted to a volume 

percent of 11.8 percent for use in NMIM, assuming MTBE was the only oxygenate. In addition, 

gasoline sulfur content revisions were incorporated into NMIM for select counties for the months 

of April through September. The final fuel input data by county and by month are summarized 

in Table B-1. 

Maryland also provided updated files listed in Table IV-8 to replace the default files used in 

NMIM. These included county allocation files for several nonroad categories. 

Table IV-8. Maryland NONROAD External Data Files 

County NR File Name File Type 

24000pop.alo County allocation for several nonroad 

categories (population) 

24000con.alo County allocation for construction 

24000hou.alo County allocation for lawn & garden 
88

Pechan used Maryland’s nonroad sector CERR submittal as the basis for the MANE-VU 

inventory for the aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories. 

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? 

In September 2004, Maryland provided revised aircraft and commercial marine vessel emission 

estimates. Pechan replaced the aircraft and commercial marine vessel emissions from their 

CERR submittal with the revised emissions. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved by 

Maryland. Maryland did not provide PM25-PRI aircraft emissions in their inventory. Pechan 

estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying 

PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). Commercial aircraft 

PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size 

multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004). 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

6. Massachusetts 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. 

Massachusetts reviewed the NMIM inputs and approved of the fuel input values for RVP and 

gasoline sulfur content. NMIM2005 reported a weight percent oxygen of 2.1 percent for all 

months for all counties in Massachusetts, and the State requested a value of 1.5 percent be used 

for all counties from October through April. This weight percent value was then converted to a 

volume percent of 8.4 percent for use in NMIM, given that MTBE was the only oxygenate. 

Final fuel input data by county and by month are presented in Table B-1. 

Massachusetts provided annual emissions for aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel 

categories for their nonroad sector CERR submittal. These inventories included all CAP. 

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? 

Massachusetts requested that Pechan incorporate revisions supplied for annual emissions for inport diesel commercial marine (SCC 2280002010) for Dukes County (25007). 
89

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Pechan changed the aircraft SCC “2275050000” to “2275000000,” since Massachusetts verified 

that this emission record represents all aircraft types, not just general aviation. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

7. New Hampshire 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New 

Hampshire reviewed and approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B-1 for a 

summary of the final fuel input data by county and month. 

Pechan used New Hampshire’s nonroad sector CERR submittal as the basis for the MANE-VU 

aircraft and locomotive inventory. Pechan added commercial marine vessel emissions from the 

preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved by New 

Hampshire. New Hampshire did not provide PM10 and PM2.5 aircraft emissions in their 

inventory. New Hampshire authorized Pechan to develop aircraft PM10 emissions for all aircraft 

types by applying an average PM10/NOx emission ratio to the aircraft NOx emissions in their 

inventory. The PM10/NOx ratios used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 for general 

aviation, and 0.058 for commercial aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, 

and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size 

multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For commercial aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25-PRI 

emissions using the assumption that 97.6% of PM10 is PM2.5 (ERG, 2004). 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

8. New Jersey 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New Jersey 

approved of the default fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B-1 for a summary of the 

final fuel input data by county and month. New Jersey provided an updated data input file 
90

containing revised equipment populations (34000.pop) for specific SCCs for the NMIM model 

runs. 

Pechan used New Jersey’s nonroad sector CERR submittal as the basis for the aircraft, 

locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories. These inventories included all CAPs. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved by New 

Jersey. The only QA issue identified was the inclusion of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the inventory, 

which is not a valid pollutant code in NIF3.0, so these records were removed. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

9. New York 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New York 

reviewed the default NMIM inputs and provided revisions to the input values for RVP and 

gasoline sulfur for all months. New York also requested revisions to weight percent oxygen 

values for all counties and months. These weight percent values were then converted to a 

volume percent for use in NMIM, based on MTBE as the only oxygenate for all counties, with 

the exception of four counties. These included Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Erie, and Niagara 

counties, which use ETOH as the oxygenate. The final fuel input data by county and by month 

are summarized in Table B-1. 

For the aircraft and locomotive categories, Pechan used emissions reported in the preliminary 

2002 Nonroad NEI. 

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? 

In October 2004, New York provided commercial marine vessel emissions to be added to their 

inventory. New York did not provide PM-2.5 commercial marine vessel emissions for some 

counties in their inventory. Pechan estimated the commercial marine vessel PM25-PRI 

emissions from PM10-PRI using the assumption that 92% of PM10 is PM2.5 (EPA, 2003b). 
91

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) emissions for PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were not 

reported in the EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. Pechan estimated PM10-PRI emissions by 

applying a PM10-PRI/NOx emission ratio of 0.058 to available NOx emissions for this SCC. 

Commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions 

by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

10. Pennsylvania 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Pennsylvania 

approved of the fuel inputs provided, which were based on the onroad MOBILE6 inputs. Since 

these differed from the values in NMIM2005, Pechan updated the NMIM profiles accordingly. 

See Table B-1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by county and month. Pennsylvania 

provided one county allocation file for the lawn and garden category (42000hou.alo) to replace 

the default file used in NMIM. 

Pennsylvania submitted an aircraft, locomotive, and commercial marine vessel emissions 

inventory to MANE-VU after the CERR submittal date. 

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? 

In August 2005, Pennsylvania provided Pechan with county-level updates to SCC 2285002006 

(Line Haul Locomotives: Class I Operations) emissions for all pollutants. Pechan updated all 

emission records for this SCC in Pennsylvania's inventory. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Pennsylvania authorized Pechan to remove the CO2 emission records from their inventory. In 

addition, the following data augmentation was performed to add missing SCCs and pollutants. 

Pennsylvania did not provide commercial aircraft emissions in their inventory. Pechan added 

commercial aircraft emissions from the 2002 preliminary NEI to Pennsylvania’s inventory. 

Pennsylvania did not provide PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI aircraft emissions in their inventory. 

Pechan developed aircraft PM10 emissions for all aircraft types by applying an average PM10/ 

NOx emission ratio to Pennsylvania’s available aircraft NOx emissions. The PM10/NOx ratios 

used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 for general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial 

aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions 

by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For 

commercial aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25-PRI emissions using the assumption that 97.6% of 

PM10 is PM2.5 (ERG, 2004). 
92

Pennsylvania also did not provide SO2 general aviation and air taxi emissions in the inventory. 

Pechan estimated the SO2 emissions by applying a SO2/NOx emission ratio to the general 

aviation and air taxi NOx emissions, using ratios of 0.154 and 0.095, respectively. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

11. Rhode Island 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Rhode Island 

approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B-1 for a summary of the final fuel 

input data by county and month. Rhode Island provided a revised equipment population file 

(44000.pop) with updated populations for specific SCCs to replace the default file used in 

NMIM. 

Rhode Island provided emissions for aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel 

categories for their nonroad sector CERR submittal. 

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? 

Rhode Island provided updates in September 2004 to their county-level railroad equipment 

emissions. The new emissions fall under SCC 2285002005 and replace all line haul locomotive 

emissions provided in their CERR submittal. Emission estimates for yard locomotives were also 

provided (SCC 2285002010). 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved by 

Rhode Island. 

PM10 was not identified as either primary or filterable. Rhode Island authorized Pechan to 

change it to PM10-PRI. To avoid double counting, Pechan removed the following SCCs from 

Rhode Island’s inventory: 2275000000, 2280002000, 2280002020, 2280003000, and 

2280003020. These emissions are accounted for under more specific SCCs for aircraft, and 

more aggregate SCCs for commercial marine. 

Rhode Island did not provide PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI aircraft emissions in their inventory. 

Pechan developed aircraft PM10 emissions for all aircraft types by applying an average 

PM10/‌NOx emission ratio to the aircraft NOx emissions in their inventory. The PM10/NOx ratios 

used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 for general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial 

aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions 

by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For 
93

commercial aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25-PRI emissions using the assumption that 97.6% of 

PM10 is PM2.5 (ERG, 2004). 

Rhode Island did not provide yard locomotive, and commercial marine vessel PM25-PRI 

emissions in their inventory. Pechan estimated the yard locomotive PM25-PRI emissions from 

PM10-PRI using the assumption that 90% of PM10 is PM25 (EPA, 2003b). Pechan estimated the 

commercial marine vessel PM25-PRI emissions from PM10-PRI using the assumption that 92% 

of PM10 is PM2.5 (EPA, 2003b). 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

12. Vermont 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Pechan developed NONROAD model SCC emissions for Vermont using NMIM2005. Vermont 

approved of the default fuel input values used in NMIM2005 for weight percent oxygen, but 

requested that the RVP and gasoline sulfur values reflect values used for onroad mobile source 

emissions. 

Pechan added aircraft emissions for Vermont from the preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) emissions for PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were not 

reported in the EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. Pechan estimated PM10-PRI emissions by 

applying an average PM10-PRI/NOx emission ratio of 0.058 to available NOx emissions. 

Commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions 

by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004). 

 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

Note that there are no locomotive or commercial marine vessel emissions in the NEI for 

Vermont. Where activity for any of these SCCs occurs in Vermont, these categories are not 

represented in the State’s inventory. 
94

CHAPTER V – ONROAD SOURCES 

A. General Methods for All States 

This section provides an overview of the data sources and QA steps used in preparing the 2002 

onroad sector inventory for the MANE-VU States and in preparing the corresponding modeling 

inputs for the MANE-VU Version 3 modeling inventory. The onroad sector is comprised of all 

motorized vehicles that travel on the public highways including passenger cars, light-duty trucks, 

minivans, sport utility vehicles, heavy-duty trucks, and buses. It should be noted that, unlike the 

other emission sectors, the modeling inventory inputs for the onroad sector do not include any 

emissions data. The primary modeling inputs for the onroad sector instead are the activity inputs 

(vehicle miles traveled (VMT)) and SMOKE-formatted MOBILE6 input files. The SMOKE 

model then generates full MOBILE6 input files using the MOBILE6 inputs, speed inputs, and 

meteorological inputs for the episode(s) to be modeled, runs the MOBILE6 emission factor 

model to calculate the appropriate emission factors, and calculates emissions using the supplied 

VMT and additional temporal allocation factors for the VMT. 

1. Data Sources 

a. Source of default model data 

The MANE-VU 2002 onroad emissions inventory was compiled from data supplied by the 

MANE-VU State agencies in the form of onroad emissions input data or emissions inventories 

either directly to MANE-VU or to EPA through their CERR submittal. States provided 

information in one or more of the following ways: (1) an onroad emission inventory submittal to 

EPA, (2) MOBILE6 inputs and VMT data in NMIM format to EPA, (3) portions of MOBILE6 

inputs or full MOBILE6 input files and supporting files plus VMT to EPA, or (4) portions of 

MOBILE6 inputs or full MOBILE6 input files and supporting files plus VMT to MANE-VU. 

Different procedures were followed in developing the MANE-VU 2002 onroad emission 

inventory depending upon how the data were submitted. 

As discussed above, the primary data needed in preparing the inputs for the onroad modeling 

files were the VMT data and MOBILE6 input files. All of the MANE-VU States provided VMT 

data, which were incorporated in the SMOKE modeling. The level of detail of the supplied 

VMT data and any additional processing of the VMT data are discussed individually by State, 

below, in Section B: State-Specific Methods. Therefore, no default data were needed for the 

VMT inputs. Default model inputs for the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files were needed in some 

cases. The source of default information to be included in these input files was the NMIM 

national county database, as this was also the default source of data for EPA in preparing the 

2002 NEI. This database includes information on monthly fuel data by county, control program 

information by county, such as inspection and maintenance (I/M) program inputs, and other fleet 

information, such as vehicle registration distributions, that may have been supplied by the States. 

Additionally, vehicle speed information is needed in the SMOKE modeling files. Some States 

supplied this information. In cases where no speed data were supplied, the default speeds used 

by EPA in calculating the NEI were used. These speeds differ by road class group and by 

vehicle class group. 
95

For the SMOKE modeling, Pechan did not provide any ambient data such as temperature or 

humidity. Instead, the SMOKE model needs meteorological input data specific to the episode(s) 

being modeled. Thus, although the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files do include temperature data 

and in some cases humidity data, these inputs will be replaced by the SMOKE model with the 

appropriate episode-specific data. 

b. Model inputs and revisions provided by States 

The model inputs and revisions provided by the States are discussed in detail in Section B, 

below. These inputs include VMT data, VMT temporal data, vehicle speeds, I/M program 

inputs, registrations distributions, and other MOBILE6 input data. 

c. Model inputs provided vs. model inputs used 

Pechan prepared the following model input files for Version 3 of the MANE-VU modeling 

inventory: 

• MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt—contains VMT and speeds by county and SCC; 

• MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt—contains VMT temporal profiles; 

• MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt—contains cross references between temporal 

profiles and county/SCC; 

• MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt—contains VMT vehicle mix fractions; 

• MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt—contains cross reference between MANE-VU 

counties and the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files; 

• MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt—contains general county-level information for 

SMOKE; 

• MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt—contains hourly speed profiles (SPDPRO); 

• MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt—contains cross references between speed profiles and 

MANE-VU county/SCC; 

• MANEVU_2002_mcodes.txt—contains information on SCCs used in MBINV file; 

• MANEVU_SMOKE_M6Inputs_MA_NJ_02022006.zip—contains monthly SMOKEformatted MOBILE6 input files for Massachusetts and New Jersey, updated for Version 

3; 

• MANEVU_2002_SMOKE_M6_InputFiles032004.zip—contains monthly SMOKEformatted MOBILE6 input files for all MANE-VU States. Files for Massachusetts and 

New Jersey from this zip file should be replaced by the Version 3 files dated 02/02/2006. 

• MANEVU_2002_SMOKE_M6_ExternalFiles.zip—contains external data files called by 

the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files. 

2. What Quality Assurance Steps were Performed? 

This section provides a brief summary of the QA steps and processes that were performed in the 

development of the onroad sector modeling inputs for MANE-VU. The initial QA procedures 

were performed on the emissions and input data used to calculate the MANE-VU 2002 onroad 
96

emission inventory. Some of these QA procedures are also relevant here to the modeling 

inventory as many of the inputs are either the same or start with common information. 

For States submitting onroad emission inventories to EPA, Pechan performed QA checks on the 

State-provided emission inventory data to ensure completeness, referential integrity, and correct 

formatting of the data. Where necessary as a result of these QA checks, and with the approval of 

the affected State, Pechan revised the inventories to meet the necessary inventory standards. For 

the modeling inventory, the VMT checks included in these QA checks are relevant. Note that a 

Quality Assurance Plan was prepared prior to initiating work on Version 1 (MANE-VU, 2003). 

This plan was applied during development of all three versions of the MANE-VU inventory. 

a. Data input summary spreadsheets for State review

In reviewing the data submitted for both the annual onroad inventory and the onroad modeling 

files, Pechan prepared a State QA report for each State. These reports were in the form of Excel 

spreadsheets. In each of the State QA reports, a page was included that summarized the 

modeling inputs. This included MOBILE6 input parameters, such as I/M data, registration data, 

and fuel data. Columns were included indicating the data file name, data coverage (e.g., 

statewide or for specific counties), data source, any comments regarding the data, an indication 

of whether any guidance was requested from the State agency before proceeding, and columns 

for State agency approval of the listed inputs. These reports were provided to each State agency 

and the State could either approve the inputs summarized or provide an alternate data source or 

calculation method. For States that had submitted emission inventories in NIF format, results of 

the NIF QA checks were also included in these State QA reports for the states to review and 

approve and provide alternate data or methods. This table also include information on the VMT 

data source and any proposed methodologies needed for processing the VMT. 

b. Responses from State Agencies 

The appropriate State agency staff reviewed the State QA reports and provided direction for 

correcting QA issues either in the QA Summary Report Excel file or via e-mail. The modeling 

inputs were then revised to incorporate responses from the agencies. 

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries 

Table V-1 presents a summary of the annual 2002 Version 3 MANE-VU onroad sector pollutant 

emissions for each MANE-VU State, as well as a regional total. Differences between these 

Version 3 annual emission totals and the Version 2 totals documented in the January 2005 

MANE-VU mobile sources inventory report are the result of updated data provided by New 

Jersey and Massachusetts. Emissions for the remaining states have not changed. It should be 

noted that these emission results are from the annual inventory modeling. These will differ from 

the results obtained by the SMOKE onroad modeling. Additionally, the emissions in this table 

do not reflect VMT updates from Vermont that were provided after the Version 2 MANE-VU 

annual inventory had been calculated, but were included in the SMOKE Version 2 and Version 3 

modeling inputs. 
97

Table V-1. Annual 2002 Onroad Sector Emissions by MANE-VU State 

(Tons/Year) 

State VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10-PRI PM25-PRI NH3

Connecticut 31,755.3 68,816.2 562,124.0 1,666.9 1,580.0 1,041.6 3,293.9 

Delaware 10,563.8 21,340.5 160,760.4 583.9 581.1 414.9 902.8 

District of Columbia 4,895.3 8,902.0 66,017.6 271.1 222.0 153.0 397.8 

Maine 23,037.4 54,686.8 410,957.8 1,803.9 1,239.1 934.4 1,467.5 

Maryland 61,846.7 122,210.0 1,000,762.8 4,057.6 3,168.3 2,200.4 5,594.3 

Massachusetts 57,185.5 143,367.6 1,039,100.1 4,398.8 3,407.5 2,409.9 5,499.1 

New Hampshire 16,762.3 33,283.0 306,792.5 776.9 814.3 561.8 1,447.0 

New Jersey 89,752.9 152,076.1 1,273,513.1 3,648.6 3,725.3 2,469.0 7,382.0 

New York 287,845.2 319,732.5 3,711,149.6 10,639.5 8,457.5 5,897.7 14,680.9 

Pennsylvania 176,090.3 346,471.5 2,784,196.5 10,924.1 7,351.5 5,331.2 10,532.3 

Rhode Island 12,537.8 16,677.2 186,196.8 425.3 345.1 210.5 852.6 

Vermont 17,287.8 20,669.9 248,247.6 893.8 669.6 482.8 934.1 

Total MANE-VU 789,560.3 1,308,233.3 11,749,818.8 40,090.5 31,561.3 22,107.2 52,984.3 

B. State-Specific Methods 

The following sections describe what modeling inputs were used for each State and how these 

inputs were developed. 

1. Connecticut 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-2 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information 

for the State of Connecticut. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as 

the source of the original information used to create these data files. 

The VMT inputs provided by Connecticut were in the form of three sets of data. This included a 

file with VMT by county and four road types (Expressway, Arterial/Collector, Local, and 

Ramp), a set of Statewide VMT mixes at the 16 vehicle type-level for each of the four 

Connecticut road types, and a Statewide hourly VMT distribution file. Additional data provided 

by Connecticut showing the correspondence between the four Connecticut road types and the 12 

Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) road types were used to first distribute the 

county VMT to the 12 road types. Average daily miles were converted to annual miles by 

multiplying the average daily miles by 365. Pechan then developed a simple MOBILE6 input 

file that used the Connecticut registration distribution and with a separate scenario for each of the 

VMT mixes provided at the 16 vehicle type level. Pechan used the resulting MOBILE6 output 

file to extract the 28 vehicle type VMT mix corresponding to each of the four Connecticut road 

types. The VMT data by county and 12 road types were then multiplied by the 28 vehicle type 

VMT fractions to obtain a VMT file at the 28 vehicle type level and 12 road type level by county 

(for use in calculating the annual emission inventory). VMT from these 28 vehicle types were 
98

then aggregated to the 12 vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file. The VMT 

mix fractions by vehicle type for each county and road type were also calculated for inclusion in 

the SMOKE VMTMIX file. 

Table V-2. Connecticut Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC CT 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 vehicle 

groups 

Default 

NEI 

Speed 

profiles 

MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt and 

MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt 

County/hour/road 

type 

CT 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide/road type CT 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

For Connecticut, speed information is contained in both the MBINV SMOKE file as well as in 

the SMOKE speed profile (SPDPRO) and speed cross reference file (SPDREF) files. The speed 

information contained in the MBINV file is simply the default NEI speed data. The actual speed 

data to be used in the modeling inventory for Connecticut are contained in the SMOKE SPDPRO 

and SPDREF. The speed data from these two files should overwrite the default speed 

information contained in the MBINV file during the SMOKE modeling. The data used to 

develop the speed profiles were provided by Connecticut in the form of NMIM speed input files 

with the fraction of VMT occurring within each of 14 speed bins. These speed distributions 

differ by hour of day and by freeways versus arterials and collectors. Separate speed distribution 

files were provided by Connecticut for each county. Pechan then converted these speed data into 

the speed profile format needed for SMOKE—hourly average speeds by county and the two 

specified road types. 

Connecticut provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 

input files for the SMOKE modeling: 

• Statewide registration distribution; 

• Hourly VMT distributions; 

• Statewide I/M program inputs and Anaerobic Thermal Processor (ATP); and 

• RVP and fuel program data. 

The data submitted by Connecticut indicated that Federal Northern reformulated gasoline is in 

place in the State, with an ozone season RVP of 6.8 pounds per square inch (psi). Based on the 

NMIM modeling that was performed for the annual emission inventory, the reformulated 

gasoline program was modeled in the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files using the combination of 

the FUEL PROGRAM: 4 command (indicating user-supplied gasoline sulfur inputs), RVP 

command, and the OXYGENATED FUELS command. The monthly oxygenated fuel and 

gasoline sulfur inputs, and the non-ozone season monthly RVP values were obtained from the 
99

NMIM national county database for Connecticut. During the ozone season months, the RVP 

value submitted by Connecticut of 6.8 psi was modeled. The fuel data obtained from NMIM are 

the same for all counties in Connecticut, except Fairfield, which shows different fuel properties, 

but all represent reformulated gasoline. These values for both Fairfield and the remaining 

counties differed by season (i.e., the ozone season from May through September, transition 

months of March, April, October, and November, and the winter months of December, January, 

and February). Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 367 ppm sulfur in the 

summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, 

January, and February), and 353 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months. 

Data provided by Connecticut indicated that the State follows the OTC low emission vehicle 

(LEV) program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV program LEV 

implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting 

implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV 

program in the 2001 model year. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

No QA issues were identified for Connecticut. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

2. Delaware 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-3 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information 

for the State of Delaware. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the 

source of the original information used to create these data files. 

Delaware provided VMT data in the form of the NEI NIF PE table as well as in the NMIM 

BaseYearVMT table format. Additionally, Delaware provided monthly VMT fractions 

developed from VMT counts on a variety of road types. These monthly VMT fractions were 

provided for each of the Delaware counties. Since the data in the NEI NIF PE table were at the 

level of detail needed for the SMOKE MBINV file, the format of the VMT data was simply 

converted from the NIF format to the SMOKE MBINV format. Similarly, the monthly VMT 

fractions were converted to the profile format needed in the SMOKE MTPRO file, with the 

appropriate cross references in the MTREF file. The average speeds provided by Delaware at 

the county/road type level were included in the SMOKE MBINV file. 
100

Table V-3. Delaware Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC DE 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type DE 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type 

Temporal 

profiles 

MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and 

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt 

Monthly by 

county/road type 

DE 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

The fuel data submitted by Delaware was based on the NMIM defaults with the NMIM October 

data replaced by the NMIM November data. The reformulated gas fuel parameters were 

modeled in the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files by using the combination of the OXYGENATED 

FUELS, FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands for each 

month. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 300 ppm sulfur in the summer 

months (June, July, and August), 280 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and 

February), and 290 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months. 

Data provided by Delaware indicated that the State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle 

implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was 

included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year 

followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

No QA issues were identified for Delaware. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

3. District of Columbia 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-4 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information 

for the District of Columbia. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as 

the source of the original information used to create these data files. 
101

Table V-4. District of Columbia Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC DC 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type DC 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Road type DC 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

The District of Columbia provided 2002 VMT data in the form of the NMIM BaseYearVMT 

table. This table included VMT at the 28 vehicle type level for each of the six urban road types 

in the District of Columbia. VMT from these 28 vehicle types were then aggregated to the 12 

vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file. The VMT mix fractions by vehicle 

type for each county and road type were also calculated for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX 

file. The District also provided a spreadsheet including the daily average weighted speed by 

roadway class. These speeds were incorporated in the SMOKE MBINV file. The District of 

Columbia provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input 

files for the SMOKE modeling: 

• District-wide registration distribution; 

• I/M program and ATP inputs; and 

• Weekday trip length distribution file. 

The District of Columbia specified that the NMIM fuel program default data for the District 

should be used for the MANE-VU modeling. This included reformulated gasoline district wide, 

modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands 

for each month. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 329 ppm sulfur in the 

summer months (June, July, and August), 324 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, 

January, and February), and 326 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months. 

Data provided by the District of Columbia indicated that the District follows the OTC-LEV 

program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV program LEV 

implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting 

implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV 

program in the 2001 model year. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

No QA issues were identified for the District of Columbia. 
102

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for the District of Columbia should include the OXYGENATED 

FUELS command to fully model reformulated gasoline in the District of Columbia. This 

command was inadvertently left out of the SMOKE MOBILE6 files. 

4. Maine 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-5 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information 

for the State of Maine. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the 

source of the original information used to create these data files. 

Table V-5. Maine Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC ME 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type ME 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide/road type Default 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

Maine provided 2002 average daily VMT by county and 12 roadway types. Maine had no 

information available on the distribution of VMT among vehicle types. Therefore, Pechan 

developed the VMT by county, roadway type, and vehicle type by using the default MOBILE6 

2002 VMT mix by vehicle type. These VMT data were converted to annual VMT by 

multiplying the average daily VMT by 365. The MOBILE6 VMT default mix fractions by 

vehicle type for 2002 were included for Maine in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. Maine also 

provided average speed data by county and roadway type. These data were included in the 

SMOKE MBINV file. 

Maine provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files 

for the SMOKE modeling: 

• I/M program inputs and ATP inputs for Cumberland County only; and 

• Monthly average RVP data. 

Statewide diesel sulfur values were obtained from the NMIM defaults for Maine. A diesel sulfur 

value of 390 ppm sulfur was modeled in the summer months (June, July, and August), 338 ppm 

sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 364 ppm sulfur in the spring 

and fall months. 
103

Data provided by Maine indicated that the State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle 

implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was 

included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year 

followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

No QA issues were identified for Maine. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

5. Maryland 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-6 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information 

for the State of Maryland. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the 

source of the original information used to create these data files. 

Maryland submitted annual VMT data in the form of a NIF tblMobilePE table. This included 

VMT by county, 12 vehicle types, and 12 road types. These VMT data were then converted to 

the format needed for the SMOKE MBINV file. Pechan calculated VMT mix fractions from the 

VMT data supplied by Maryland to obtain the VMT mixes by county and road type contained in 

the SMOKE VMTMIX file. In addition, Maryland provided monthly VMT distribution data by 

road type. Pechan converted these data to the format needed for the SMOKE MTPRO and 

MTREF files. The same set of monthly temporal profiles were applied to all counties in 

Maryland. Maryland also provided a spreadsheet showing the average speed Statewide for each 

of the 12 roadway types. These speed data were included in the SMOKE MBINV file. 

Maryland provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input 

files for the SMOKE modeling: 

• County-specific registration distribution; 

• County-specific diesel sales fractions; 

• I/M program inputs and ATP inputs to be applied in the 14 I/M counties; and 

• Statewide monthly diesel sulfur content data. 

Maryland indicated that the NMIM default fuel parameters for Maryland should be used in the 

MANE-VU modeling. This fuel data includes reformulated gasoline in 14 of the Maryland 

counties. The reformulated gasoline program was modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL 

PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands for each month. Maryland provided 

monthly Statewide diesel sulfur values. These values ranged from 455 ppm sulfur to 500 ppm 
104

sulfur. These values were included in the corresponding monthly SMOKE MOBILE6 input 

files. 

Table V-6. Maryland Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC MD 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type MD 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type MD 

Temporal 

profiles 

MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and 

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt 

Statewide monthly by 

road type 

MD 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

Data provided by Maryland indicated that the State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle 

implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was 

included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year 

followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

No QA issues were identified for Maryland affecting the modeling inventory files. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for Maryland should include the OXYGENATED FUELS 

command to fully model reformulated gasoline in the Maryland counties that implement the 

reformulated gasoline program. This command was inadvertently left out of the Maryland 

SMOKE MOBILE6 files. 
105

6. Massachusetts 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-7 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information 

for the State of Massachusetts. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as 

the source of the original information used to create these data files. 

Table V-7. Massachusetts Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC MA 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type MA 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type Default 

Temporal 

profiles 

MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and 

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt 

Monthly by county MA 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

The Version 3 MANE-VU onroad modeling for Massachusetts differed from the Version 2 

modeling, based on updates provided by Massachusetts in December 2005. The primary 

changes for Massachusetts from Version 3 is the use of updated 2002 VMT data and vehicle 

speed date. Massachusetts provided a spreadsheet containing revised VMT values and vehicle 

speeds for 2002 by county and SCC. Pechan prepared the revised Massachusetts VMT data and 

the speed data in the format of the SMOKE MBINV file. Using the revised VMT data by SCC, 

Pechan calculated the updated VMT mixes by vehicle type for each county and road type in 

Massachusetts and formatted the resulting data to be included in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. 

The original VMT data submitted by Massachusetts included VMT for each of the four seasons. 

Pechan used these data to develop monthly VMT temporal profiles. Seasonal VMT was 

assigned to the months in that season based on the ratio of the number of days in a specific 

month to the number of days in the season. Pechan then formatted the monthly temporal VMT 

allocation factors for inclusion in the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files. 
106

Massachusetts provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 

input files for the SMOKE modeling: 

• Statewide registration distribution; 

• Statewide I/M program inputs and ATP inputs; 

• RVP and fuel program data; 

• Diesel sulfur content of 350 ppm sulfur year-round and statewide; and 

• Massachusetts-specific LEV and Tier 2 implementation files. 

Northern reformulated gasoline was modeled statewide throughout the State, with a RVP value 

of 6.7 psi during the ozone season and 13.5 psi during the remaining months, based on inputs 

provided by Massachusetts. The section below on QA issues for Massachusetts discusses the 

fuel inputs modeled in the Version 3 SMOKE MOBILE6 input files in more detail. 

Massachusetts provided the necessary inputs to model the State’s LEV implementation schedule 

and Tier 2 data, which differ from the OTC-LEV program and from the default MOBILE6 Tier 2 

data. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

In addition to the VMT updates, Pechan revised the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files for 

Massachusetts for Version 3. This was done because Version 2 of the MANE-VU modeling 

inventory was prepared using the default setting of MOBILE6 to model reformulated gasoline 

(i.e., using the command line “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”). Since the time that the Version 2 

inventory was created, EPA found a bug with the sulfur content values used when the default 

reformulated gasoline command is used. To eliminate this problem, Pechan created revised 

SMOKE MOBILE6 input files for Massachusetts that model reformulated gasoline by explicitly 

setting the RVP, gasoline sulfur contents, and gasoline oxygen contents. The gasoline sulfur 

contents and gasoline oxygen contents were set according to the default parameters laid out in 

the MOBILE6 user’s guide. The summer (May through September) sulfur content is 129 ppm in 

2002 and the winter sulfur content is 279 ppm in 2002. The summer gasoline contains 2.1 

percent oxygen, with MTBE as the oxygenate. The winter gasoline contains 1.5 percent oxygen 

in 70 percent of the fuel having MTBE as the oxygenate, and 3.5 percent oxygen in 30 percent of 

the fuel having ETOH as the oxygenate. The RVP values were not changed from those modeled 

in Version 2 (6.7 psi in the summer and 13.5 psi in the winter). 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

7. New Hampshire 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-8 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information 

for the State of New Hampshire. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well 

as the source of the original information used to create these data files. 
107

Table V-8. New Hampshire Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC NH 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type NH 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide NH 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

The VMT inputs provided by New Hampshire were in the form of summer day VMT by county 

or nonattainment area and roadway type. In addition, New Hampshire provided a Statewide 

VMT mix distribution by 16 vehicle types in the MOBILE6 files provided by the State. Pechan 

then developed a simple MOBILE6 input file that used the New Hampshire Statewide 

registration distribution and the Statewide VMT mix by vehicle type. Pechan used the resulting 

MOBILE6 output file to extract the 28 vehicle type VMT mix to be applied Statewide to the 

county/roadway type VMT data. Summer day miles were converted to annual miles by using 

national data from the Federal Highway Administration’s Travel Volume Trends which provides 

2002 monthly VMT for groups of road categories. Additionally, the VMT data from the three 

New Hampshire nonattainment areas represented four counties. To allocate these VMT by 

county, Pechan first totaled the VMT data from these three nonattainment areas by roadway type. 

Then, using ratios developed from the preliminary 2002 NEI VMT, Pechan allocated the 

grouped VMT by county and roadway type. With VMT for the entire State at the 

county/roadway type level of detail, Pechan then multiplied the VMT data by the 28 vehicle type 

VMT fractions to obtain a VMT file at the 28 vehicle type level and 12 roadway type level by 

county for use in preparing the annual onroad emission inventory. VMT from these 28 vehicle 

types were then aggregated to the 12 vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file. 

The VMT mix fractions by vehicle type for each county and road type were also calculated for 

inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. New Hampshire also provided a spreadsheet including 

the average speed by roadway class for each county or county group. These speeds were 

incorporated in the SMOKE MBINV file. 

New Hampshire provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 

input files for the SMOKE modeling: 

• Statewide registration distribution; and 

• Statewide ATP inputs. 

New Hampshire specified that the NMIM fuel program default data for New Hampshire should 

be used for the MANE-VU modeling. This included reformulated gasoline in four counties, 

modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands 

for each month. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 400 ppm sulfur in the 
108

summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, 

January, and February), and 370 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months. 

Data provided by New Hampshire indicated that the State follows the OTC-LEV program 

vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation 

schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 

model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model 

year. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Through the State QA report process, New Hampshire provided updated inputs for VMT and 

speeds that were incorporated in the modeling inventory inputs. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for the four New Hampshire that implement reformulated gasoline 

should include the OXYGENATED FUELS command to fully model the benefits reformulated 

gasoline. This command was inadvertently left out of the SMOKE MOBILE6 files. 

8. New Jersey 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-9 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information 

for the State of New Jersey. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the

source of the original information used to create these data files. 

Table V-9. New Jersey Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC NJ 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 vehicle 

groups 

Default 

NEI 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type NJ 

Temporal 

profiles 

MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and 

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt 

Monthly by 3 county 

groups and 

weekday/weekend 

NJ 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

Updates were made to the Version 2 MOBILE6 SMOKE inputs for New Jersey in December 

2005 to create Version 3, based on revised data provided by the State. New Jersey provided the 

following files: 
109

• a set of SMOKE MOBILE6 input files by county and month; 

• NJ_2002_mbinv.txt file that contained revised VMT and speeds by county and SCC, 

generated by NJDEP in August 2005, in SMOKE format;

• amptref.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805_NJVMT.txt—a SMOKE-formatted file containing 

county/SCC-level temporal profile cross-references;

• amptro.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805_NJVMT.txt—a SMOKE-formatted file containing 

county-specific VMT temporal profiles prepared by NJDEP in August 2005; and 

• zip files containing external files needed to run the SMOKE MOBILE6 files. 

After an initial review of these files, Pechan did not note any differences in the SMOKE 

MOBILE6 files from the Version 2 files. Pechan then confirmed with New Jersey that the only 

changes from the Version 2 date were in the VMT data. The VMT and speed data by county and 

SCC in the MBINV file provided by New Jersey were copied to the MANE-VU SMOKE 

MBINV file, replacing the VMT and speed data from the Version 2 SMOKE MBINV file for 

New Jersey. The speed data included by New Jersey are the default NEI speeds by road type and 

vehicle type. Using the new VMT data provided by New Jersey, Pechan calculated a revised set 

of VMT mix fractions by vehicle type and included these in the Version 3 SMOKE VMTMIX 

file. Pechan pasted the temporal profiles provided for New Jersey into the SMOKE MTPRO 

file. This included monthly temporal profiles and diurnal temporal profiles. The diurnal 

temporal profiles were applied to both weekdays and weekends. Similarly the temporal cross 

reference data included in the file provided by New Jersey was pasted into the SMOKE MTREF 

file for MANE-VU Version 3. 

The following New Jersey-provided were included in the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the 

SMOKE modeling: 

• Statewide registration distribution; 

• Statewide diesel sales fractions; 

• Statewide I/M program and ATP inputs; and 

• Diesel sulfur content data (340 ppm statewide). 

Northern reformulated gasoline was modeled statewide throughout the State, using NMIM fuel 

program input defaults for New Jersey. The section below on QA issues for New Jersey 

discusses the fuel inputs modeled in the Version 3 SMOKE MOBILE6 input files in more detail. 

Data provided by New Jersey indicated that the State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle 

implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was 

included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year 

followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

As discussed above for New Jersey, the Version 2 New Jersey SMOKE MOBILE6 input files 

modeled reformulated gasoline using the command line “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”, which is 

the default method for modeling reformulated gasoline with MOBILE6. To eliminate the effects 
110

of the MOBILE6 reformulated gasoline bug from the SMOKE MOBILE6 inputs, Pechan 

explicitly modeled the reformulated gasoline program in the New Jersey MOBILE6 input files 

by explicitly modeling the appropriate settings of the RVP, oxygenated fuel content commands, 

and gasoline sulfur commands. The values for oxygenated fuel settings and gasoline sulfur 

contents by month were extracted from the NMIM county-level database used in developing the 

annual emissions inventory for the MANE-VU Version 2 onroad emissions inventory. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

9. New York 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-10 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing 

information for the State of New York. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as 

well as the source of the original information used to create these data files. 

Table V-10. New York Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC NY 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 vehicle 

groups 

Default 

NEI 

Speed 

profiles 

MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt and 

MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt 

County/hour/road 

type 

NY 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type NY 

Temporal 

profiles 

MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and 

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt 

Monthly by 3 county 

groups 

NY 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

VMT for New York was provided in the form of a NIF PE table. These VMT data were 

extracted and included in the SMOKE MBINV file. VMT mix fractions by vehicle type were 

calculated from these VMT data and included in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. 

New York provided a spreadsheet with average speeds in each of four daily time periods by 

county and road type. Pechan converted these speed data to the SMOKE SPDPRO format, 

assigning the speed for a given time period to all hours included in that time period. Pechan also 

prepared the SMOKE SPDREF file to appropriately cross reference each county and road type to 

the corresponding hourly speed profile. Because these more detailed speed files were provided 

for New York, the average speed by road type and county in the MBINV file was populated with 

default NEI speeds. 
111

New York also provided spreadsheets showing monthly VMT by county and roadtype. After 

processing these VMT values to develop monthly temporal factors, Pechan observed that there 

were only three unique monthly profiles in this data set. These three profiles were then added to 

the SMOKE MTPRO file. Pechan then matched each county and road type in the State to the 

corresponding monthly VMT profile in the SMOKE MTREF file. 

New York provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input 

files for the SMOKE modeling: 

• Registration distributions—one for the New York metropolitan area and one for the 

rest of the State; 

• Diesel sales fractions—one for the New York metropolitan area and one for the rest 

of the State; 

• Statewide mileage accumulation rate input; 

• Monthly RVP data—one set for the New York metropolitan area and one for the rest 

of the State; 

• Reformulated gasoline program inputs for affected counties modeled with MOBILE6 

defaults (i.e., “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”); 

• I/M program inputs for affected counties; 

• Statewide ATP inputs; 

• Hourly VMT distributions by county group; 

• Start distributions by county; 

• Diesel sulfur content data (400 ppm statewide). 

New York also provided the necessary input files to model the State’s LEV program 

implementation schedule, which differs from the OTC LEV program. New York also provided 

MOBILE6 Tier 2 modeling files to be used along with the New York LEV program inputs. 

These inputs were included in the SMOKE MOBILE6 modeling. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

No QA issues were identified for New York affecting the modeling inventory files. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

10. Pennsylvania 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-11 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing 

information for the State of Pennsylvania. This table notes the level of detail of the data included 

as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files. 
112

Table V-11. Pennsylvania Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC PA 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type PA 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type PA 

Temporal 

profiles 

MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and 

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt 

Monthly by county PA 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

Pennsylvania provided a database file (NEIANN02.dbf) that contained the VMT and speed data 

by county, roadway type, and vehicle type. This included the same VMT used in the calculation 

of the annual onroad inventory submitted by Pennsylvania for MANE-VU. Pechan converted 

the data from this database file into VMT and speed data in the format of the SMOKE MBINV 

file. From the VMT data, Pechan calculated VMT fractions by vehicle type by county and road 

type for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. Pennsylvania also provided estimates of VMT 

by month for each county. Pechan converted these data to monthly allocation factors in the 

format needed by the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files. A separate monthly profile was 

developed for each county, but applied to all road types within that county. 

Pennsylvania provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 

input files for the SMOKE modeling: 

• Registration distributions for each individual county; 

• I/M program and ATP inputs for affected Philadelphia and Pittsburgh area counties 

(inputs differ for the two areas); 

• Monthly RVP data for all counties including 7.8 psi RVP program from May 

through September for Pittsburgh counties; 

• Reformulated gasoline for the 5-county Philadelphia area modeled with MOBILE6 

defaults (i.e., “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”); and 

• Diesel sulfur content data (500 ppm statewide). 

Data provided by Pennsylvania indicated that the State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle 

implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was 

included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year 

followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year. 
113

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

No QA issues were identified for Pennsylvania affecting the modeling inventory files. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 

11. Rhode Island 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-12 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing 

information for the State of Rhode Island. This table notes the level of detail of the data included 

as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files. 

Table V-12. Rhode Island Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC RI 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County group/road 

type 

RI 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide RI 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

Rhode Island provided a spreadsheet with the 2002 VMT as well as Statewide 2002 VMT 

fractions by 16 vehicle types. Pechan prepared a simple MOBILE6 input file including this 

Rhode Island 2002 VMT mix by vehicle type and the 2002 Rhode Island registration 

distribution. The VMT mix in the MOBILE6 output file at the 28 vehicle type level was then 

used to distribute the VMT by vehicle category. The 2002 daily VMT was at the State level, 

broken down by the 12 roadway types. To allocate these VMT data to the county/road type level 

of detail, Pechan summed the VMT from the preliminary version of EPA’s 2002 NEI for Rhode 

Island first by State and roadway type and then by county and roadway type. Pechan calculated 

county/roadway type VMT fractions by dividing the VMT at the county/roadway type level by 

the State/roadway type VMT for the same roadway type. These fractions were then multiplied 

by the VMT supplied by Rhode Island at the State/roadway type level of detail to obtain 

county/roadway type VMT data. These county/roadway type VMT data were then multiplied by 

the 28 vehicle type VMT fractions to obtain VMT at the level of detail needed to populate the 

NMIM BaseYearVMT table for calculating the annual inventory and were then summed to the 

16-vehicle type level of detail for use in the SMOKE MBINV file. The data were also converted 

from daily VMT to annual by multiplying the average daily VMT by 365. VMT mix fractions 
114

from this final data set were then formatted in the SMOKE VMTMIX format at the State level of 

detail. Statewide speeds by road type, as provided by Rhode Island, were included in the 

SMOKE MBINV file. 

Rhode Island provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 

input files for the SMOKE modeling: 

• Statewide registration distribution; and 

• Statewide I/M program inputs. 

Data for fuel parameters were obtained from the NMIM national county database for Rhode 

Island. This included reformulated gasoline Statewide, modeled using the FUEL RVP, and 

FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands for each month. These values 

differed by season, but were consistent Statewide. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from 

NMIM were 400 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sulfur in 

the winter months (December, January, and February), and 370 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall 

months. 

The NMIM default LEV program for Rhode Island was modeled, which includes the OTC-LEV 

program LEV implementation schedule. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

No QA issues were identified for Rhode Island. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

The Rhode Island SMOKE MOBILE6 input files did not include the OXYGENATED FUELS 

command. This should have been used to fully characterize the parameters of reformulated 

gasoline that is used Statewide in Rhode Island. 

12. Vermont 

a. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Table V-13 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing 

information for the State of Vermont. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as 

well as the source of the original information used to create these data files. 
115

Table V-13. Vermont Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files 

 Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail 

Data 

Source 

VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC VT 

Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/vehicle 

group (light-duty vs. 

heavy-duty) 

VT 

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type VT 

Temporal 

profiles 

MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and 

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt 

Monthly statewide 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County 

SMOKE 

MOBILE6 file 

listing 

MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

Vermont submitted VMT data in the format of the NIF PE table. Vermont then provided 

updated VMT data for three road classifications (rural minor collectors, rural local roads, and 

urban local roads) in December 2004, after the time that these changes could be included in the 

MANE-VU annual onroad emission inventory. However, the updated VMT were included in the 

MANE-VU Version 3 onroad SMOKE modeling files. This VMT change resulted in a 

Statewide decrease in VMT from about 9.5 billion miles to about 7.8 billion miles. As a result, 

the SMOKE modeling performed by MANE-VU will not match the MANE-VU emission 

inventory for Vermont. The VMT data were converted to the SMOKE MBINV file format. 

VMT mix fractions were calculated from the VMT data and included in the SMOKE VMTMIX 

file. Vermont also provided information on the temporal allocation of VMT. From these data, 

Pechan prepared a monthly VMT profile for Vermont and included the data in the SMOKE 

MTPRO and MTREF files. 

Vermont provided information on Statewide speeds by roadway type. These speeds differed for 

light-duty vehicles and heavy-duty vehicles. Pechan incorporated this speed information into the 

SMOKE MBINV file. 

Vermont provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input 

files for the SMOKE modeling: 

• Statewide registration distribution; 

• Statewide I/M program inputs; and 

• RVP data. 

The RVP data provided by Vermont were based on data from a local gasoline tank farm and 

resulted in an RVP value of 8.5 psi during the ozone season months (May through September) 

and 9.47 psi for the remaining months. Data for fuel parameters other than RVP (e.g., diesel and 

gasoline fuel sulfur content) were obtained from the NMIM national county database for 

Vermont. These values differed by season, but were consistent Statewide. Statewide diesel 
116

sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 300 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and 

August), 290 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 295 ppm 

sulfur in the spring and fall months. 

The NMIM default LEV program for Vermont was modeled, which includes Vermont’s Statespecific LEV implementation schedule. 

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed? 

Through the State QA report process, Vermont provided a missing registration data file, RVP 

data and revised VMT. 

c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? 

None identified by the State. 
117

CHAPTER VI – BIOGENIC SOURCES 

A. General Methods for all States 

1. What Data Sources Were Used? 

Biogenic emissions for the time period from January 1, 2002 – December 31, 2002 were 

calculated by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) for all 

of the MANE-VU states using the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS) version 3.12 

integrated within SMOKE2.1. The inventory was prepared at the state-level for CO, nitrous 

oxide (NO), and VOC. 

General information about BEIS is available at http://www.epa.gov/AMD/biogen.html while 

documentation about biogenic emissions processing within SMOKE2.1 is available at 

http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/products/smoke/version2.1/html/ch06s10.html and 

http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/products/smoke/version2.1/html/ch06s17.html. Note that the 

SMOKE documentation refers to BEIS3.09 and has not yet been updated for BEIS3.12. This 

affects the number of species modeled as well as the use of different speciation profiles. 

However, the general processing approach has not changed from BEIS3.09 to BEIS3.12. In 

short, this processing approach is as follows and was utilized by NYSDEC for its biogenic 

emission processing for MANE-VU and the OTC modeling: 

• Normbeis3 reads gridded land use data and emissions factors and produces gridded 

normalized biogenic emissions for 34 species/compounds. The gridded land use file 

utilized by NYSDEC includes the fractional coverage of 230 different land use types 

for each of the 172 * 172 12-km grid cells in the MANE-VU/OTC modeling domain. 

In a separate BEIS3.12 input file, both summer and winter emissions factors for each 

species/compound are provided for each of the 230 land use types. On output, 

Normbeis3 generates a file B3GRD which contains gridded summer and winter 

emission fluxes for the modeling domain that are normalized to 30 °C and a 

photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) of 1000 μmol/m

2

s. In addition, gridded 

summer and winter leaf area indices (LAI) are also written to B3GRD. 

• Tmpbeis3 reads the gridded, normalized emissions file B3GRD and meteorological 

data from the MCIP-processed MM5 meteorological fields generated by the 

University of Maryland for MANE-VU/OTC modeling. Specifically, the following 

MM5/MCIP meteorological variables are used by Tmpbeis3 to compute hourspecific, gridded biogenic emissions from the normalized emission fluxed contained 

in B3GRD: layer-1 air temperature (“TA”), layer-1 pressure (“PRES”), total 

incoming solar radiation at the surface (“RGRND”), and convective (“RC”) and nonconvective (“RN”) rainfall. Additionally, the emissions for the 34 

species/compounds modeled by BEIS3.12 are converted to CO, NO, and the CB-IV 

VOC species utilized in CMAQ via the use of the BEIS3.12-CB-IV speciation 

profile. Furthermore, an external file, BIOSEASON, was utilized to decide whether 

to use summer or winter emissions factors for any given grid cell on any given day. 

This file was generated by the SMOKE2.1 utility Metscan based on MM5 layer-1 air 
118

temperatures to determine the date of the last spring frost and first fall frost at each 

grid cell. Summer emission factors are used by Tmpbeis3 for the time period 

between the day of the last spring frost and the day of the first fall frost at any given 

grid cell, and winter emission factors are used for the remaining time period. 

Documentation for the Metscan utility is available at http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/ 

products/smoke/version2.1/html/ch05s07.html. An animated GIF file showing the 

BIOSEASON file used by NYSDEC can be found at ftp://ftp.dec.state.ny.us/dar/ 

air_research/chogrefe/biog_reports/b3season_movie.gif. 

• For reporting purposes, the hourly, speciated, gridded emissions were aggregated to 

the county level for each day. For any given grid cell, emissions were distributed 

among the counties intersecting this grid cell in proportion to the area of each of these 

counties within the grid cell. The area gridding surrogates needed for this 

aggregation are based on a file obtained from EPA via http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ 

chief/emch/spatial/new/bgpro.2km_041604.us.gz, followed by windowing for the 

MANE-VU/OTC modeling domain. 

2. Version 3 Emissions Summary 

Table VI-1 presents a State-level summary of the annual biogenic source emissions in Version 3 

of the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. The annual emissions are based on the sum of the daily 

emissions prepared using the modeling approach previously discussed. 

Table VI-1. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Biogenic Source 

Emissions by State (Tons/Year) 

State CO NO VOC* Connecticut 6,889 560 64,017

Delaware 4,274 990 46,343

District of Columbia 150 30 1,726

Maine 64,936 2,018 600,205

Maryland 18,351 2,934 210,104

Massachusetts 11,594 1,257 113,958

New Hampshire 14,306 482 141,894

New Jersey 14,058 1,813 181,617

New York 63,436 8,313 492,487

Pennsylvania 59,946 8,646 585,272

Rhode Island 1,764 211 19,233

Vermont 14,745 1,142 118,377

MANE-VU 274,451 28,396 2,575,232 

* VOC emissions were calculated by adding the emissions for the 

following pollutants: ALD2, ETH, FORM, ISOP, NR, OLE, PAR, TERB, 

TOL, XYL. 

B. State-Specific Methods 

No state-specific methods were used in Version 3 of the MANE-VU inventory for biogenic 

emissions. 
119

CHAPTER VII. TEMPORAL, SPECIATION, AND SPATIAL ALLOCATION 

PROFILES AND PREPARATION OF SMOKE (IDA) AND RPO DATA 

EXCHANGE PROTOCOL (NIF 3.0) FORMATS 

Table VII-1 provides a summary of the file names and documentation used for modeling inputs 

for Version 3 of MANE-VU’s 2002 inventory for point, area, nonroad, and onroad sources. The 

final input files used for temporal allocation, speciation, and spatial allocation of emissions were 

developed for Version 1 of the 2002 inventory and delivered to MARAMA during January 2005 

(MANE-VU, 2005). These files were developed starting with the latest model input files 

available from EPA and then revised to include updates needed for the MANE-VU region or to 

add SCCs and profile assignments not included in the initial EPA data sets. The files were 

revised between September 2004 and January 2005 to incorporate comments provided by 

MANE-VU. Files in Table VII-1 with a date that is later than January 2005 were prepared to 

support modeling for Version 3. The notes column in the table identifies the modifications made 

to the files if the files were changed after this date. Otherwise, files with a date later than 

January 2005 were either provided by a state agency or were obtained from EPA and used for 

modeling Version 3. 

The remainder of this chapter provides a brief summary of the revisions made to the EPA data 

sets prepared for Version 1 of the 2002 MANE-VU inventory and subsequently carried for the 

modeling for Version 3. Sections A, B, and C of this chapter discuss how the temporal 

allocation, speciation, and spatial allocation profiles, respectively, were developed. Section D of 

this chapter describes how the emissions inventory data were prepared in the SMOKE (IDA) and 

RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0) Formats. 

A. Temporal Profiles 

1. Point and Area Sources 

The most recent SMOKE temporal cross-reference files available from EPA during the summer 

of 2004 were used as the starting point for developing the cross-reference files for point and area 

sources. The following 3 classes of modifications were completed to improve the temporal 

allocation input files: 

• Update temporal cross-reference to assign an existing profile in the default SMOKE 

profiles for SCCs in the MANE-VU inventory 

• Create a new temporal cross-reference to an existing profile in the default SMOKE 

profiles for SCCs in the MANE-VU inventory; the cross-reference did not previously 

exist in the default SMOKE files but the profile did exist. 

• Create new temporal profiles and cross-references for SCCs in the MANE-VU 

inventory; neither the cross-reference nor profiles for the MANE-VU SCCs 

previously existed in the default SMOKE files. 
120

a. Point Sources 

A total of 30 point SCCs existed in the MANE-VU point source inventory that were not in the 

point source cross-reference file; therefore, the SCCs were added to the cross-reference file and 

assigned to existing profiles based on the assignment of similar SCCs already assigned to the 

profiles. Table II-2 lists the SCCs along with the state and county FIPS where they occurred in 

the MANE-VU inventory. Temporal profiles could not be identified for the SCCs listed in Table 

VII-3 due to either the SCC being shorter than 8-digits or the lack of information about the 

source categories for identifying an appropriate profile assignment. These SCCs were assigned 

the default profile by SMOKE. 

b. Area Sources 

For area sources, the improvements to the EPA cross-reference file included updates to existing 

profiles in the file based on MANE-VU-specific data (see Table VII-4), addition of SCCs that 

were assigned to existing profiles based on the assignment of similar SCCs already assigned to 

the profiles (see Table VII-5), and addition of new SCCs and profiles based on MANE-VU- or 

RPO-specific data (see Table VII-6). 

Additional cross-referencing information used to revise the temporal cross-reference file 

included MANE-VU county-level information for residential wood combustion, monthly 

temporal profiles developed for NH3 source categories using the Carnegie Mellon University 

(CMU) model, and a Delaware-specific cross-reference file associated with the Delaware 

inventory. The additions of new SCCs and new profiles shown in Table VII-6 mostly apply to 

the state of Delaware (State FIPS=10). For the FIPS column, the “-9” designation means the 

cross-reference is applied for all counties that do not have a county or state-specific SCC crossreference record. These changes to the temporal cross-reference file allowed for the assignment 

of a non-flat temporal profile (262= uniform monthly, 7=uniform weekly and 24=uniform 

diurnal) to 95% of the SCCs in the area inventory. 

2. Nonroad Sources 

Nonroad sources used the same temporal profile and cross-reference files as area sources. 

3. Onroad Sources 

For onroad sources, the following States provided their own data to update the default temporal 

profile files and the temporal cross reference files: Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, 

Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont. Each of these States 

provided VMT information that could be used to develop monthly temporal profiles. The data 

were provided in a variety of formats, ranging from monthly or seasonal VMT to SMOKEformatted monthly VMT temporal profiles. Where necessary, the monthly or seasonal VMT 

data were converted into the SMOKE monthly temporal profile format. In addition, New Jersey 

provided information for diurnal temporal profiles. However, the level of detail or variability 

provided in these monthly profiles varied by State. Connecticut’s and Delaware’s profiles each 

varied by county and road type. Maryland’s profiles applied Statewide, with variability in the 
121

profiles by road type. Massachusetts’ profiles varied by county, road type, and vehicle type. 

Both New Jersey and New York provided information for three monthly temporal profiles, each 

used throughout one of the three county groups in each State. The Pennsylvania profiles varied 

by county, but not by road type. Vermont provided information for a single monthly temporal 

profile to be used throughout the State. 

B. Speciation Profiles 

1. Point and Area Sources 

The most recent SMOKE speciation cross-reference files available from EPA during the summer 

of 2004 were used as the starting point for developing the cross-reference files for point and area 

sources. These files were revised to complete SCC assignments for the Carbon Bond IV (CBIV) with PM mechanism for point and area sources. In addition, sulfur tagging species were 

added to the REMSAD7 CB-IV with PM mechanism (see Table VII-1). 

a. Point Sources 

Thirty-one SCCs in the MANE-VU point source inventory did not have chemical speciation 

profile assignments for the CB-IV with PM mechanism in the default SMOKE chemical crossreference file. For 10 of the SCCs, assignments for VOC and PM2.5 were added to the speciation 

cross-reference file based on the speciation profile codes assigned to similar SCCs. Table VII-7 

shows the SCCs where an SCC speciation cross-reference record was added, the VOC and PM2.5

speciation profile code assigned, and the method used to assign the profiles. Assignments were 

not completed for the remaining 21 point source SCCs because of a lack of information on the 

emission sources needed to complete the assignments (see Table VII-8 for the list of the SCCs). 

b. Area Sources 

Speciation profile assignments were completed for many area source SCCs for the CB-IV with 

PM mechanism and were documented in separate spreadsheet files provided to MARAMA 

during September 2004. Assignments for VOC and PM2.5 were added to the speciation crossreference file based on the speciation profile codes assigned to similar SCCs. Note that the 

transport fractions for fugitive dust were applied as a part of the modeling effort to adjust the 

mass emissions in Version 3 of the inventory. 

2. Nonroad Sources 

No updates to the speciation profiles or speciation assignments for nonroad sources were 

provided by the MANE-VU States. 

3. Onroad Sources 

No updates to the speciation profiles or speciation assignments for onroad sources were provided 

by the MANE-VU States. 
122

C. Spatial Allocation Profiles 

The most recent spatial profile data files available from EPA during the summer of 2004 were 

used as the starting point for developing the spatial profile file for point and area sources. A 

detailed description of this surrogate dataset was provided in a file named “surrogate_ 

documentation_workbook052804.xls” from EPA’s website at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ 

chief/emch/spatial/newsurrogate.html. Many SCCs in the MANE-VU inventory did not have 

surrogate assignments in the default SMOKE gridding cross-reference file. About 200 SCC 

assignments were added to the gridding cross-reference file. The assignments were based on 

matching surrogate descriptions from the EPA99 surrogate data with the SCC descriptions. 

No updates to the spatial allocation files for nonroad and onroad sources were provided by the 

MANE-VU States. 

D. Preparation of SMOKE (IDA) and RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0) 

Formats 

Table VII-9 identifies the mass emissions and SMOKE input files for Version 3 of the 

MANE-VU point, area, nonroad, and onroad inventories. 

The SMOKE input file format contains one field for storing daily emissions for each pollutant. 

The area source inventory contains summer day, winter day, and average day emissions 

depending on the state and source category. Thus, two sets of SMOKE input files were prepared 

for the area source inventory. One file contains annual, summer day, and average day emissions 

and the other file contains annual, winter day, and average day emissions. If summer day and 

average day emissions were provided for the same process and pollutant in the inventory, the 

summer day value was included in the SMOKE input file. If winter day and average day 

emissions were provided for the same process and pollutant in the inventory, the winter day 

value was included in the SMOKE input file. 

The point source inventory contains summer day and winter day emissions. Two sets of 

SMOKE input files were prepared for point sources as well (one file containing annual and 

summer day emissions and the other containing annual and winter day emissions). 

Table VII-10 provides the unique list of the start date, end date, and emission type combinations 

for daily emissions in the point and area source inventories that were used to define summer, 

winter, and average day emissions. This table also shows the names of the SMOKE input files in 

which the emissions are included. 

For onroad sources, daily emissions were calculated by SMOKE using the monthly MOBILE6 

input files included in the SMOKE input files. 

The nonroad IDA file only has annual total emissions. The values in the “typical day” column 

are zero. Annual total emissions were allocated for each hour using the monthly, weekly, and 

diurnal profiles described in Section A.2 of this chapter. 
C-123 

Table VII-1. Profiles, Cross-references, and Documentation for Model Inputs 

for Version 3 of 2002 MANE-VU Inventory 

Description File Name Format 

Date of 

File used 

for 

Version 3 

Size 

(Bytes) 

SCC descriptions file scc_desc_manevu.083104.txt SMOKE 8/31/2004 1,335,524 Temporal Allocation ProfilesTechnical memo on profile/cross-reference review for area sources 

MANE-VU_AreaEI_review_draft_090304.doc MS 

Word 

9/3/2004 760,320 

Technical memo on profile/cross-reference review for point sources 

MANE-VU_PointEI_review_draft_090304.doc MS 

Word 

9/3/2004 262,144 

Temporal profile crossreference file for point sources 

amptref.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805.txt SMOKE 3/28/2005 704,998 Based on "amptref.m3

Version 1, but added Vthe state-specific 2002 

(CEM)-derived point soby VISTAS for their Ba

Temporal profiles file for point sources 

amptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.vistascem.032805.txt SMOKE 3/28/2005 178,427 Based on "amptpro.m3

prepared for Version 1CEM-derived point souVISTAS for their BaseD 

Temporal profile crossreference file for area sources 

amptref.m3.manevu.012405.txt SMOKE 1/24/2005 687,196 

Temporal profiles file for area sources 

amptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.030205.txt SMOKE 3/2/2005 136,131 

Temporal crossreference file containing state-specific onroad mobile source data for Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont 

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006_addCT.txt SMOKE 2/22/2006 2,522,013 Data for Connecticut w

was prepared for the o“_addCT” is included a
Table VII-1 (continued) 

124

Description File Name Format 

Date of 

File used 

for 

Version 3 

Size 

(Bytes) 

Temporal profiles file containing state-specific onroad mobile source data for Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont 

MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006_addCT.txt SMOKE 2/22/2006 23,122 Data for Connecticut w

was prepared for the o“_addCT” is included a

Spatial/GriddingSpreadsheet summary generated for area source gridding review 

MANE-VU_agref_review.xls 8/31/2004 1,607,680 

Spatial profile crossreference file amgref.m3.us+can+mex.manevu.082404.txt SMOKE 8/31/2004 89,860 Gridding surrogate cross-reference file 

amgref_us_051704_manevu_added SMOKE 5/17/2004 35,825 Based on the surrogate 

from the EPA/CHIEF ssurrogates file. Howevadditions included in "amgref.m3.us+can+m1 were added to the grdownloaded from EPA

SCCs 2806010000, 282870000015, 2870000

Modeling grid (12-km) amgpro.12km_041604.otc12.us.txt SMOKE 4/16/2004 150,689,358 Based on downloaded 

windowed for the OTC 

Speciation ProfilesSpreadsheet summary generated for area source speciation review 

MANE-VU_asref_review.xls Excel 8/31/2004 5,626,880 

Speciation profiles file for CB-IV 

gspro.cmaq.cb4p25.txt SMOKE 142,255 

Speciation crossreference file for CB-IV gsref.cmaq.cb4p25.manevu.083104.txt SMOKE 8/31/2004 786,998 
Table VII-1 (continued) 

125

Description File Name Format 

Date of 

File used 

for 

Version 3 

Size 

(Bytes) 

Speciation profile crossreference assignment file 

gsref.cmaq.cb4p25.txt SMOKE 2/1/2005 754,302 This file is based on the 

"gsref.cmaq.cb4p25.mversion 1 of the MANEwas to change the PM2default 99999 to 35501 categories. This updatCENRAP or VISTAS in provided and the updatthan the MANE-VU file

appeared to be a refine

Speciation profiles for REMSAD7 

gspro.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt_tag SMOKE 5/1/2005 532,990 Based on "gspro.remsa

but added tagged spectagging. 

Speciation crossreference for REMSAD7 gsref.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt_tag SMOKE 5/1/2005 2,614,360 Based on "gsref.remsa

but added tagged specsulfur tagging. 

Transport fractions for fugitive dust 

gcntl.xportfrac.txt SMOKE 2/1/2004 124,495 File obtained from inpu

transport for modeling (CAIR). 
C-126 

Table VII-2. Point Source Temporal Cross-reference Additions 

Recommended profiles 

State FIPS SCC Monthly Weekly Diurnal Method of assignment 

SCC Description (Complete 

availab

VT 50005 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Ind

Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry W

VT 50019 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Ind

Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry W

VT 50021 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Ind

Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry W

VT 50017 10300908 262 7 24 Use SCC=103009XX profiles External Combustion 

Boilers;Commercial/Institutional;fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% m

PA 42009 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Ind

Gas;Unknown 

PA 42029 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Ind

Gas;Unknown 

PA 42045 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Ind

Gas;Unknown 

PA 42061 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Ind

Gas;Unknown 

PA 42067 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Ind

Gas;Unknown 

PA 42015 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion 

Engines;Commercial/Institutiona

PA 42029 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion 

Engines;Commercial/Institutiona

PA 42037 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion 

Engines;Commercial/Institutiona

PA 42071 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion 

Engines;Commercial/Institutiona

PA 42011 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fu

Classified;Specify in Comments 

PA 42123 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fu

Classified;Specify in Comments 

PA 42123 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fu

Classified;Specify in Comments 

PA 42129 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fu

Classified;Specify in Comments 

MD 24031 30500261 262 7 24 Use SCC=30500260 profile Industrial Processes;Mineral Pro

Concrete;Drum Mix Plant: RotarWaste/Drain/#6 Oil-Fired 
Table VII-2 (continued) 

127

Recommended profiles 

State FIPS SCC Monthly Weekly Diurnal Method of assignment 

SCC Description (Complete 

availab

NY 36055 31603001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacPreparation;Extrusion Operation

NY 36055 31603002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacPreparation;Film Support Opera

NY 36055 31604001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacPreparation;Chemical Manufactu

NY 36055 31604002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacPreparation;Emulsion Making O

NY 36055 31604003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacPreparation;Chemical Mixing Op

NY 36055 31605001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacTreatments;Surface Coating Op

NY 36055 31605002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacTreatments;Grid Ionizers 

NY 36055 31605003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacTreatments;Corona Discharge T

NY 36055 31606001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacOperations;General Film Manufa

NY 36055 31606002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacOperations;Cutting/Slitting Oper

PA 42101 31606002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Product ManufacOperations;Cutting/Slitting Oper

NY 36055 31612001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities Cleaning Operations 

NY 36055 31612002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities Operations;General Cleaning Op

NY 36055 31613002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities Operations;General Storage Op
Table VII-2 (continued) 

128

Recommended profiles 

State FIPS SCC Monthly Weekly Diurnal Method of assignment 

SCC Description (Complete 

availab

NY 36055 31614001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities 

Operations;Filling Operations (n

NY 36055 31614002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities 

Operations;Transfer of Chemica

NY 36055 31615001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities Processes;Recovery Operations 

NY 36055 31615003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities Processes;Distillation Operation

NY 36055 31616002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities Process Tank Operations 

NY 36055 31616003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities Operations;Miscellaneous Manu

NY 36055 31616004 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities Spraying Operations 

NY 36055 31616006 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as 

guidance and evaluate specific sources 

Industrial Processes;PhotographManufacturing;Support Activities Operations;Chemical Weighing O

PA Numerous 

counties 

39000698 262 7 24 Use SCC=39000699 profile Industrial Processes;In-process 

Gas;Unknown 

NJ Numerous 

counties 

39999901 262 7 24 Use SCC=399999XX profiles Industrial Processes;Miscellaneo

Industries;Miscellaneous Industr

PA 42015 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evapora

Operations;Miscellaneous Metal 

PA 42017 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evapora

Operations;Miscellaneous Metal 

PA 42091 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evapora

Operations;Miscellaneous Metal 

PA 42095 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evapora

Operations;Miscellaneous Metal 

PA 42097 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evapora

Operations;Miscellaneous Metal 

PA 42013 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evapora

Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Pla

PA 42041 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evapora

Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Pla
Table VII-2 (continued) 

129

Recommended profiles 

State FIPS SCC Monthly Weekly Diurnal Method of assignment 

SCC Description (Complete 

availab

PA 42045 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evapora

Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Pla

PA 42071 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evapora

Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Pla
C-130 

Table VII-3. Unknown SCCs in the MANE-VU Point Source Inventory 

State FIPS SCC Description 

PA 42101 24950002 Need more info: Unknown SCC 

PA 42061 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; General 

PA 42091 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; General 

PA 42133 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; General 
C-131 

Table VII-4. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference Updates 

SMOKE Default profile New 

SCC SCC description Monthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly 

30502713 Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Industrial Sand 

and Gravel;Screening: Size Classification 

262 7 24 262 

30502760 Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Industrial Sand 

and Gravel;Sand Handling, Transfer, and Storage 

262 7 24 262 

2302000000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 

20;All Processes;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2302050000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 

20;Bakery Products;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2305000000 Industrial Processes;Mineral Processes: SIC 32;All 

Processes;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2309100010 Industrial Processes;Fabricated Metals: SIC 34;Coating, 

Engraving, and Allied Services;Electroplating 

262 7 26 262 

2311010000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;General 

Building Construction;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2311020000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;Heavy 

Construction;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2311030000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;Road 

Construction;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2325000000 Industrial Processes;Mining and Quarrying: SIC 14;All 

Processes;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2399000000 Industrial Processes;Industrial Processes: NEC;Industrial 

Processes: NEC;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2399010000 Industrial Processes; Industrial 

Refrigeration; Refrigerant Losses; All Processes 

262 7 26 262 

2401015000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Factory Finished 

Wood: SIC 2426 thru 242;Total: All Solvent Types 

173 7 26 173 

2401020000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Wood Furniture: SIC 

25;Total: All Solvent Types 

287 7 26 287 

2401025000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Furniture: SIC 

25;Total: All Solvent Types 

287 7 26 287 

2401030000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Paper: SIC 26;Total: 

All Solvent Types 

257 7 26 257 

2401040000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Cans: SIC 

341;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2401045000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Coils: SIC 

3498;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2401050000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Miscellaneous 

Finished Metals: SIC 34 - (341 + 3498);Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 
Table VII-4 (continued) 

132

SMOKE Default profile New 

SCC SCC description Monthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly 

2401055000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Machinery and 

Equipment: SIC 35;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2401060000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Large Appliances: 

SIC 363;Total: All Solvent Types 

262 7 26 262 

2401065000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Electronic and Other 

Electrical: SIC 36 - 363;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2401070000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Motor Vehicles: SIC 

371;Total: All Solvent Types 

140 7 26 140 

2401075000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Aircraft: SIC 

372;Total: All Solvent Types 

169 7 26 169 

2401080000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Marine: SIC 

373;Total: All Solvent Types 

266 7 26 266 

2401085000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Railroad: SIC 

374;Total: All Solvent Types 

169 7 26 169 

2401090000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Miscellaneous 

Manufacturing;Total: All Solvent Types 

260 7 26 260 

2401090999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Miscellaneous 

Manufacturing;Solvents: NEC 

260 7 26 260 

2401200000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Other Special 

Purpose Coatings;Total: All Solvent Types 

260 7 26 260 

2401990000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;All Surface Coating 

Categories;Total: All Solvent Types 

260 7 26 260 

2401990999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;All Surface Coating 

Categories;Solvents: NEC 

260 7 26 260 

2415000000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Processes/All 

Industries;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415020000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products 

(SIC 34): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415025000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery and 

Equipment (SIC 35): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415030000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec. 

(SIC 36): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415035000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment 

(SIC 37): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415045000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous 

Manufacturing (SIC 39): All Processes;Total: All Solvent 

Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415055000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Automotive Dealers (SIC 

55): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415060000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous Repair 

Services (SIC 76): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 
Table VII-4 (continued) 

133

SMOKE Default profile New 

SCC SCC description Monthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly 

2415065000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC 

75): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415100000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Open Top 

Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415105000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Furniture and Fixtures 

(SIC 25): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415110000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Primary Metal Industries 

(SIC 33): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415120000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products 

(SIC 34): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415125000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery and 

Equipment (SIC 35): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415130000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec. 

(SIC 36): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415135000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment 

(SIC 37): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415140000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Instruments and Related 

Products (SIC 38): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415145000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous 

Manufacturing (SIC 39): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415200000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: 

Conveyerized Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415230000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec. 

(SIC 36): Conveyerized Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415300000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Cold 

Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415305000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Furniture and Fixtures 

(SIC 25): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415310000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Primary Metal Industries 

(SIC 33): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415320000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products 

(SIC 34): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415325000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery and 

Equipment (SIC 35): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent 

Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415330000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec. 

(SIC 36): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 
Table VII-4 (continued) 

134

SMOKE Default profile New 

SCC SCC description Monthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly 

2415335000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment 

(SIC 37): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415340000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Instruments and Related 

Products (SIC 38): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent

Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415345000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous 

Manufacturing (SIC 39): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415355000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Automotive Dealers (SIC 

55): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415360000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC 

75): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

253 7 26 253 

2415365000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous Repair 

Services (SIC 76): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent

Types 

253 7 26 253 

2425000000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;All Processes;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

257 7 26 257 

2425010000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Lithography;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

257 7 26 257 

2425020000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Letterpress;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

257 7 26 257 

2425030000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Rotogravure;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

262 7 26 262 

2425040000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Flexography;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

257 7 26 257 

2430000000 Solvent Utilization;Rubber/Plastics;All Processes;Total: 

All Solvent Types 

200 7 26 200 

2601010000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;On-site 

Incineration;Industrial;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2601020000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;On-site 

Incineration;Commercial/Institutional;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2610010000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open 

Burning;Industrial;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2610020000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open 

Burning;Commercial/Institutional;Total 

262 7 26 262 

2805020000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - 

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Total 

489 7 26 1500 

2805025000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - 

Livestock;Hogs and Pigs Waste Emissions;Total 

489 7 26 1500 

2805030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Total 

489 7 26 1500 
Table VII-4 (continued) 

135

SMOKE Default profile New 

SCC SCC description Monthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly 

2805035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - 

Livestock;Horses and Ponies Waste Emissions;Total 

262 7 26 1500 

2805040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - 

Livestock;Sheep and Lambs Waste Emissions;Total 

489 7 26 1500 

2805045001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - 

Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Total 

489 7 26 262 

2810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other 

Combustion;Prescribed Burning for Forest Management;Total 

14 7 24 3 
C-136 

Table VII-5. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference Additions 

 

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal 

2104008002 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Fireplaces: Insert; 

non-EPA certified 

485 7 26 

2104008003 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Fireplaces: Insert; 

EPA certified; non-catalytic 

485 7 26 

2104008004 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Fireplaces: Insert; 

EPA certified; catalytic 

485 7 26 

2302002100 

Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized 

Charbroiling 

262 7 26 

2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling 262 7 26 

2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 262 7 26 

2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 262 7 26 

2302003200 

Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle 

Frying 

262 7 26 

2302080002 

Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Miscellaneous Food and Kindred 

Products;Refrigeration 

262 7 26 

2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural 

Coatings - Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26 

2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural 

Coatings - Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26 

2401102000 

Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings-Solvent-based;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

500 5 26 

2401103000 

Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings-Water-based;Total: All Solvent

Types 

500 5 26 

2415270000 

Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Manufacturing 

(except SIC 36): Vapor and In-Line Cleaning;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

253 5 12 

2415280000 

Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other

Elec. (SIC 36): Vapor and In-Line Cleaning;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

253 5 12 

2415370000 

Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation 

Equipment Repair Services: Cold Cleaning;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

253 5 12 

2415380000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Manufacturing: 

Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12 

2610000400 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open 

Burning;All Categories;Yard Waste - Brush Species 

Unspecified 

262 7 26 

2610000500 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open 

Burning;All Categories;Land Clearing Debris (use 28-

10-005-000 for Logging Debris Burning) 

262 7 26 

2610040400 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open 

Burning;Municipal (collected from residences, 

parks,other for central burn);Yard Waste - Total 

262 7 26 

2630020010 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public 

Owned;Wastewater Treatment Processes Total 

262 7 24 
Table VII-5 (continued) 

137

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal 

2630020020 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public 

Owned;Biosolids Processes Total 

262 7 24 

2630020030 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Land 

Application - Digested Sludge 

262 7 24 

2630050000 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Land 

Application - Digested Sludge 

262 7 24 

2680001000 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery;Composting;100% Biosolids (e.g., sewage 

sludge, manure, mixtures of these matls);All 

Processes 

262 7 26 

2680002000 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery;Composting;Mixed Waste (e.g., a 50:50 

mixture of biosolids and green wastes);All Processes 

262 7 26 

2801700011 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Calcium Ammonium 

Nitrate 

998 7 26 

2801700012 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Potassium Nitrate 998 7 26 

2801700013 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Diammonium Phosphate 998 7 26 

2801700014 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Monoammonium 

Phosphate 

998 7 26 

2801700015 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Liquid Ammonium 

Polyphosphate 

998 7 26 

2801700099 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Miscellaneous Fertilizers 

998 7 26 

2805001100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on 

feedlots (drylots);Confinement 

1500 7 26 

2805001200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on 

feedlots (drylots);Manure handling and storage 

1500 7 26 

2805001300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on 

feedlots (drylots);Land application of manure 

1500 7 26 

2805002000 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle Composite; Not Elsewhere 

Classified 

1500 7 26 

2805003100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on 

pasture/range;Confinement 

1500 7 26 

2805007100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure 

management systems;Confinement 

1500 7 26 

2805007200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure 

management systems;Management 

1500 7 26 

2805007300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure 

management systems;Land application of manure 

262 7 24 

2805007330 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure 

management systems; Land application 

1500 7 26 

2805007340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure 

management systems; Land application 

1500 7 26 
Table VII-5 (continued) 

138

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal 

2805008100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure 

management systems;Confinement 

1500 7 26 

2805008200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure 

management systems;Manure handling and storage 

1500 7 26 

2805008300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure 

management systems;Land application of manure 

1500 7 26 

2805009100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Confinement 1500 7 26 

2805009300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Land 

application of manure 

1500 7 26 

2805010100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Confinement 262 7 24 

2805010200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Manure 

handling and storage 

262 7 24 

2805010300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Land 

application of manure 

1500 7 26 

2805018000 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle composite; Not Elsewhere 

Classified 

1501 7 26 

2805019100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Confinement 1500 7 26 

2805019200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Manure handling 

and storage 

1500 7 26 

2805019300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Land application of 

manure 

1500 7 26 

2805020001 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Milk 

Cows 

1500 7 26 

2805020002 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Beef 

Cows 

1500 7 26 

2805020003 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Heifers

and Heifer Calves 

1500 7 26 

2805021300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;Land application 

of manure 

1500 7 26 

2805022100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Confinement 1500 7 26 

2805022200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Manure 

handling and storage 

1500 7 26 

2805022300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Land 

application of manure 

1500 7 26 

2805023300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land 

application of manure 

1500 7 26 

2805030001 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Pullet Chicks and

Pullets less than 13 weeks old 

1500 7 26 
Table VII-5 (continued) 

139

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal 

2805030002 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Pullets 13 weeks 

old and older but less than 20 weeks 

1500 7 26 

2805030003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Layers 1500 7 26 

2805030004 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Broilers 1500 7 26 

2805030008 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Geese 1500 7 26 

2805039100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with 

lagoons;Confinement 

1500 7 26 

2805039200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with 

lagoons;Manure handling and storage 

1500 7 26 

2805039300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with 

lagoons;Land application of manure 

1500 7 26 

2805045000 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Not Elsewhere 

Classified 

1500 7 26 

2805045002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Angora Goats 1500 7 26 

2805045003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Milk Goats 1500 7 26 

2805047100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house 

operations;Confinement 

1500 7 26 

2805047300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house 

operations;Land application of manure 

1500 7 26 

2805053100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations; 

Confinement 

1500 7 26 

2805054000 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;"Mules; Donkeys; and Burros Waste 

Emissions";Not Elsewhere Classified 

262 7 24 

2806010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals 

Waste Emissions;Cats;Total 262 7 24 

2806015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals 

Waste Emissions;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 

2807020001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste 

Emissions;Bears;Black Bears 262 7 26 

2807020002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste 

Emissions;Bears;Grizzly Bears 262 7 26 

2807025000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste 

Emissions;Elk;Total 262 7 26 

2807030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste 

Emissions;Deer;Total 262 7 26 

2807040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste 

Emissions;Birds;Total 262 7 26 

2810060100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other 

Combustion;Cremation;Humans 262 7 24 

2870000001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Respiration 

and Perspiration;Total 262 7 24 

2870000002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Infant Diapered 

Waste;Total 262 7 24 

2870000011 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic 

Activity;Household Products;Total 262 7 24 
Table VII-5 (continued) 

140

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal 

2870000015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Nonagricultural Fertilizers;Total 3 7 24 

2870000021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic 

Animals;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 

2870000022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic 

Animals;Cats;Total 262 7 24 

2870000031 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals;Deer;Total 262 7 24 
C-141 

Table VII-6. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference and Profile Additions 

for the MANE-VU Inventory 

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 

2102002000 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Industrial;Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal;Total: 

All Boiler Types 

1726 8 26 10000 

2102006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Industrial;Natural 

Gas;Total: Boilers and IC Engines 

1727 8 26 10000 

2102007000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Industrial;Liquified 

Petroleum Gas (LPG);Total: All Boiler Types 

1727 8 26 10000 

2103001000 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Anthracite Coal;Total: 

All Boiler Types 

1720 8 26 10000 

2103004000 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Distillate Oil;Total: 

Boilers and IC Engines 

1721 8 26 10000 

2103006000 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Total: 

Boilers and IC Engines 

1722 8 26 10000 

2103007000 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Liquified Petroleum 

Gas (LPG);Total: All Combustor Types 

1723 8 26 10000 

2104002000 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Residential;Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal;Total: All Combustor Types 

1732 7 26 10000 

2104004000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Distillate 

Oil;Total: All Combustor Types 

1733 7 26 10000 

2104006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Natural 

Gas;Total: All Combustor Types 

1734 7 26 10000 

2104007000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Liquified 

Petroleum Gas (LPG);Total: All Combustor Types 

1735 7 26 10000 

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood;Total: 

Woodstoves and Fireplaces 

1740 2007 2014 10001 

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood;Total: 

Woodstoves and Fireplaces 

1741 2008 2015 10003 

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood;Total: 

Woodstoves and Fireplaces 

1742 2009 2016 10005 

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood;Total: 

Woodstoves and Fireplaces 

1742 2009 2016 10005 

2104008070 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Outdoor Wood Burning 

Equipment; 

1743 2010 2017 10001 

2104008070 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Outdoor Wood Burning 

Equipment; 

1744 2011 2017 10003 

2104008070 

Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Residential;Wood;Outdoor Wood Burning 

Equipment; 

1745 2012 2017 10005 

2104011000 Stationary Source Fuel 

Combustion;Residential;Kerosene;Total: All Heater Types 

1736 7 26 10000 

2294000000 Mobile Sources;Paved Roads;All Paved Roads;Total: 

Fugitives 1729 7 26 10000 

2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroiling 

262 7 26 10000 

2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroiling 

262 7 26 10000 

2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling

262 7 26 10000 
Table VII-6 (continued) 

142

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 

2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling

262 7 26 10000 

2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 

262 7 26 10000 

2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 

262 7 26 10000 

2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 

262 7 26 10000 

2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 

262 7 26 10000 

2302003200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Frying 

262 7 26 10000 

2302003200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Frying 

262 7 26 10000 

2311030000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;Road

Construction;Total 

262 7 9 10000 

2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural Coatings - 

Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 

467 7 26 -9 

2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural Coatings - 

Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 

500 20 27 10000 

2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural Coatings - 

Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 

467 7 26 -9 

2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural Coatings - 

Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 

500 20 27 10000 

2401005000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Total: All Solvent Types 

1702 5 27 10000 

2401005500 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Preparation Solvents 

1702 5 27 10000 

2401005600 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Primers 

1702 5 27 10000 

2401005700 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Top Coats 

1702 5 27 10000 

2401005800 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Clean-up Solvents 

1702 5 27 10000 

2401005800 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Clean-up Solvents 

1702 5 27 10001 

2401008000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Traffic Markings;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

1700 7 26 -9 

2401008000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Traffic Markings;Total: All 

Solvent Types 

1700 5 26 10000 

2401008999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Traffic Markings;Solvents: 

NEC 

1700 7 26 -9 

2401102000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial Maintenance 

Coatings-Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 

500 5 26 10000 

2401103000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial Maintenance 

Coatings-Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 

500 5 26 10000 

2415100000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Open Top 

Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

262 6 5 10000 

2415130000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec. 

(SIC 36): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 

262 6 5 10000 

2415300000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Cold

Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

262 6 5 10000 

2415360000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC 

75): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 

262 5 5 10000 

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types

1712 7 26 10001 

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types

1714 7 26 10001 

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types

1713 7 26 10003 
Table VII-6 (continued) 

143

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types

1712 7 26 10003 

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types

1714 7 26 10005 

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types

1713 7 26 10005 

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 

1709 7 26 10001 

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 

1711 7 26 10001 

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 

1710 7 26 10003 

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 

1709 7 26 10003 

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 

1711 7 26 10005 

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 

1710 7 26 10005 

2461850001 

Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Herbicides, 

Corn 

536 7 26 10000 

2461850005 

Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Herbicides, 

Soy Beans 

536 7 26 10000 

2461850006 

Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Herbicides, 

Hay & Grains 

536 7 26 10000 

2461850051 

Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Other 

Pesticides, Corn 

536 7 26 10000 

2461850055 

Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Other 

Pesticides, Soy Beans 

536 7 26 10000 

2461850056 

Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Other 

Pesticides, Hay & Grains 

536 7 26 10000 

2501011010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Vapor Losses 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501011010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Vapor Losses 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501011011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Permeation 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501011011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Permeation 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501011012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Diurnal 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501011012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Diurnal 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501011015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Spillage 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501011015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Spillage 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501011016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Transport

1701 7 26 10000 

2501011016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Transport

1701 7 26 10000 

2501012010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Vapor Losses 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501012010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Vapor Losses 

1701 7 26 10000 
Table VII-6 (continued) 

144

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 

2501012011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Permeation

1701 7 26 10000 

2501012011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Permeation

1701 7 26 10000 

2501012012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Diurnal 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501012012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Diurnal 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501012015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Spillage 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501012015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Spillage 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501012016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Transport 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501012016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Transport 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501060000 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Total: All Gasoline/All 

Processes 

1701 7 26 -9 

2501060050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Total 

1701 7 26 -9 

2501060051 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Submerged 

Filling 

1701 7 26 -9 

2501060052 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Splash Filling 

1701 7 26 -9 

2501060053 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Balanced

Submerged Filling 

1701 7 26 -9 

2501060100 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Total 

1701 7 26 -9 

2501060100 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Total 

1724 7 26 10000 

2501060101 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Displacement 

Loss/Uncontrolled 

1701 7 26 -9 

2501060102 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Displacement 

Loss/Controlled 

1701 7 26 -9 

2501060103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Spillage

1701 7 26 -9 

2501060201 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Underground Tank:

Breathing and Emptying 

1701 7 26 -9 

2501060204 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Off-Highway 

Equipment Displacement Loss/Controlled 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501060205 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Off-Highway 

Equipment Spillage 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501080050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Airports : Aviation Gasoline;Stage 1: Total

1701 7 26 10000 

2501080102 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Airports: Aviation Gasoline;Stage 2: Displacement 

Loss 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501080103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Airports: Aviation Gasoline;Stage 2: Spillage 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501080201 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Airports: Aviation Gasoline;Underground Tank: 

Breathing and Emptying 

1701 7 26 10000 
Table VII-6 (continued) 

145

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 

2501090050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP-8;Stage 1: Total 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501090060 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP-8;Stage 2: Total 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501090070 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Airports: Jet Naphtha or JP-4;Stage 1: Total 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501090080 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Airports: Jet Naphtha or JP-4;Stage 2: Total 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501090101 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP-8;Stage 2: Total 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501090102 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Marinas: Gasoline;Stage 2: Displacement Loss 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501090103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Marinas: Gasoline;Stage 2: Spillage 

1701 7 26 10000 

2501090201 

Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage;Marinas: Gasoline;Underground Tank: Emptying and 

Breathing 

1701 7 26 10000 

2505000000 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Transport;All Transport Types;Total: All Products 

1701 7 26 -9 

2610010000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open 

Burning;Industrial;Total 

262 9 2013 10000 

2630020000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater 

Treatment;Public Owned;Total Processed 

262 7 24 10000 

2630020010 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater 

Treatment;Public Owned;Wastewater Treatment Processes 

Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2630020020 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater 

Treatment;Public Owned;Biosolids Processes Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2630020030 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater 

Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 

262 7 24 10000 

2630050000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater 

Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 

262 7 24 10000 

2680001000 

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery;Composting;100% Biosolids (e.g., sewage sludge, 

manure, mixtures of these matls);All Processes 

262 7 26 10000 

2730100000 Natural Sources;Geogenic;Wind Erosion;Total 1704 7 26 10000 

2801001001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Corn;Land preparation and cultivation 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801001005 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Wheat;Land preparation and cultivation 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801001009 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Barley;Land preparation and cultivation 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801001013 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Soybeans;Land preparation and cultivation 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801001017 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Hay/Alfalfa;Land preparation and cultivation 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801001021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Vegetables;Land preparation and cultivation 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801002001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Corn;Harvesting 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801002002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Wheat;Harvesting 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801002003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Barley;Harvesting 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801002004 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Soybeans;Harvesting 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801002005 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Hay/Alfalfa;Harvesting 

1703 20 132 10000 

2801002006 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Vegetables;Harvesting 

1703 20 132 10000 
Table VII-6 (continued) 

146

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 

2801700020 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Corn 

1705 7 26 10000 

2801700021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Sorghum 

1705 7 26 10000 

2801700022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Wheat 

1705 7 26 10000 

2801700023 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Barley 

1705 7 26 10000 

2801700024 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Soybeans 

1705 7 26 10000 

2801700025 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Hay/Alfalfa 

1705 7 26 10000 

2801700026 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Vegetables 

1705 7 26 10000 

2805001100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots 

(drylots);Confinement 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805001200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots 

(drylots);Manure handling 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805001300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots 

(drylots);Land application of 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805001310 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots 

(drylots);Land Appl 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805001320 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots 

(drylots);Land Appl 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805001330 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots 

(drylots);Land Appl 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805001340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots 

(drylots);Land Appl 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805002000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle Composite; Total 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805007100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure 

management systems;Confinement 

262 7 24 10000 

2805007200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure 

management systems;Man 

262 7 24 10000 

2805007300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure 

management systems;Land applicati 

262 7 24 10000 

2805007340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure 

management systems;Lan 

262 7 24 10000 

2805008100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure 

management systems;Confinement 

262 7 24 10000 

2805008200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure 

management systems;Manure handlin 

262 7 24 10000 

2805008310 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with wet manure 

management systems;Lan 

1708 7 24 10000 

2805008320 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with wet manure 

management systems;Lan 

1708 7 24 10000 
Table VII-6 (continued) 

147

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 

2805009100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Confinement

262 7 24 10000 

2805009200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Manure handling and 

storage 

262 7 24 10000 

2805009330 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - broilers;Land Application of 

solid manure wit 

1708 7 24 10000 

2805009340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - broilers;Land Application of 

solid manure wit 

1708 7 24 10000 

2805010100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Confinement 

262 7 24 10000 

2805010200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Manure handling and 

storage 

262 7 24 10000 

2805010330 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - turkeys;Land Application of 

solid manure with 

1708 7 24 10000 

2805010340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Poultry Production - turkeys;Land Application of 

solid manure with 

1708 7 24 10000 

2805019100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Confinement 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805019200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Manure handling and 

storage 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805019300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Land application of 

manure 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805019310 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of liquid 

manure with 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805019320 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of liquid 

manure witho 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805019330 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of solid 

manure with i 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805019340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of solid 

manure withou 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805021100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;Confinement 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805021200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;Manure handling and 

storage 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805021310 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of 

liquid manure with 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805021320 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of 

liquid manure with 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805021330 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of solid 

manure with 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805021340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of solid 

manure witho 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805023100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Confinement 

1706 7 24 10000 
Table VII-6 (continued) 

148

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 

2805023200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Manure handling 

and storage 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805023310 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application 

of liquid man 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805023320 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application 

of liquid man 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805023330 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application 

of solid manu 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805023340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application 

of solid manu 

1706 7 24 10000 

2805035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Horses and Ponies Waste Emissions;Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2805038100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons 

(unspecified animal age);Confineme 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805038200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons 

(unspecified animal age);Manure ha 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805038300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons 

(unspecified animal age);Land appl 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805039100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with 

lagoons;Confinement 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805039200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Manure 

handling and storage 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805039310 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon

(unspecified animal age) 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805039320 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon

(unspecified animal age) 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805039330 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon

(unspecified animal age) 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805039340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon

(unspecified animal age) 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Sheep and Lambs Waste Emissions;Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2805045001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2805046100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operations 

(unspecified animal age);Confine 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805046300 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operations 

(unspecified animal age);Land ap 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805047100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house 

operations;Confinement 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805047200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations 

(unspecified animal a 

1707 7 24 10000 
Table VII-6 (continued) 

149

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 

2805047310 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations 

(unspecified animal a 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805047320 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations 

(unspecified animal a 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805047330 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations 

(unspecified animal a 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805047340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations 

(unspecified animal a 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805052100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations (unspecified 

animal age);Confinement 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805053100 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations; 

Confinement 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805053200 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (unspecified 

animal age);Man 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805053310 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (unspecified 

animal age);Lan 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805053320 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (unspecified 

animal age);Lan 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805053330 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (unspecified 

animal age);Lan 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805053340 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (unspecified 

animal age);Lan 

1707 7 24 10000 

2805054000 

Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - 

Livestock;"Mules; Donkeys; and Burros Waste 

Emissions";Not Elsewhere Classif 

262 7 24 10000 

2806010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals Waste 

Emissions;Cats;Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2806015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals Waste 

Emissions;Dogs;Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2807030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste 

Emissions;Deer;Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2807040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste 

Emissions;Birds;Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2810010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Human 

Perspiration and Respiration;Total 

1739 2006 24 10000 

2810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Prescribed 

Burning for Forest Management;Total 

1731 7 24 10000 

2810030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Structure 

Fires;Total 

1715 7 24 10000 

2810035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Firefighting 

Training;Total 

1716 2004 24 10000 

2870000001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Respiration and 

Perspiration;Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2870000002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Infant Diapered 

Waste;Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2870000011 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Household 

Products;Total 

262 7 24 10000 

2870000015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Nonagricultural Fertilizers;Total 

3 7 24 10000 
Table VII-6 (continued) 

150

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 

2870000021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 10000 

2870000022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals;Cats;Total 262 7 24 10000 

2870000031 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals;Deer;Total 262 7 24 10000 

2870000032 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals;Birds;Total 1728 7 24 10000 
C-151 

Table VII-7. Point Source Speciation Profiles Added to Speciation Crossreference File for CB-IV with PM Mechanism 

Recommended 

Profiles 

State FIPS SCC VOC PM2.5

Method of 

Assignment 

SCC Description 

(Complete description not always available) 

VT 50005 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX 

profiles 

External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark 

Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture) 

VT 50019 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX 

profiles 

External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark 

Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture) 

VT 50021 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX 

profiles 

External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark 

Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture) 

VT 50017 10300908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=103009XX 

profiles 

External Combustion 

Boilers;Commercial/Institutional;Wood/Bark Waste;Wood-fired 

Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture) 

PA 42009 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas;Unknown 

PA 42029 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas;Unknown 

PA 42045 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas;Unknown 

PA 42061 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas;Unknown 

PA 42067 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas;Unknown 

PA 42015 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural 

Gas;Unknown 

PA 42029 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural 

Gas;Unknown 

PA 42037 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural 

Gas;Unknown 

PA 42071 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural 

Gas;Unknown 

PA 42011 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not 

Classified;Specify in Comments 

PA 42123 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not 

Classified;Specify in Comments 

PA 42123 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not 

Classified;Specify in Comments 

PA 42129 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX 

profiles 

Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not 

Classified;Specify in Comments 

MD 24031 30500261 0025 22035 Use SCC=30500260 

profile 

Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Asphalt Concrete;Drum 

Mix Plant: Rotary Drum Dryer/Mixer, Waste/Drain/#6 Oil-Fired 

PA Numerous 

counties 

39000698 0000 22004 Use SCC=39000699 

profile 

Industrial Processes;In-process Fuel Use;Natural 

Gas;Unknown 

NJ Numerous 

counties 

39999901 9003 22054 Use SCC=399999XX 

profiles 

Industrial Processes;Miscellaneous Manufacturing 

Industries;Miscellaneous Industrial Processes;Unknown 

PA 42015 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 

profile 

Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating 

Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown 

PA 42017 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 

profile 

Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating 

Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown 

PA 42091 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 

profile 

Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating 

Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown 

PA 42095 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 

profile 

Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating 

Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown 

PA 42097 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 

profile 

Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating 

Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown 

PA 42013 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX 

profiles 

Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage 

(non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown 

PA 42041 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX 

profiles 

Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage 

(non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown 

PA 42045 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX 

profiles 

Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage 

(non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown 

PA 42071 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX 

profiles 

Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage 

(non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown 
C-152 

Table VII-8. Point Source SCCs Lacking Speciation Profile Assignments for CB-IV 

with PM Mechanism 

State FIPS SCC Description 

NY 36055 31603001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Substrate 

Preparation;Extrusion Operations 

NY 36055 31603002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Substrate 

Preparation;Film Support Operations 

NY 36055 31604001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Chemical 

Preparation;Chemical Manufacturing 

NY 36055 31604002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Chemical 

Preparation;Emulsion Making Operations 

NY 36055 31604003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Chemical 

Preparation;Chemical Mixing Operations 

NY 36055 31605001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Surface 

Treatments;Surface Coating Operations 

NY 36055 31605002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Surface 

Treatments;Grid Ionizers 

NY 36055 31605003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Surface 

Treatments;Corona Discharge Treatment 

NY 36055 31606001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Finishing 

Operations;General Film Manufacturing 

NY 36055 31606002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Finishing 

Operations;Cutting/Slitting Operations 

PA 42101 31606002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Finishing 

Operations;Cutting/Slitting Operations 

NY 36055 31612001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Cleaning 

Operations;Tank Cleaning Operations 

NY 36055 31612002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Cleaning 

Operations;General Cleaning Operations 

NY 36055 31613002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Storage 

Operations;General Storage Operations 

NY 36055 31614001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Material 

Transfer Operations;Filling Operations (non petroleum) 

NY 36055 31614002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Material 

Transfer Operations;Transfer of Chemicals 

NY 36055 31615001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Separation 

Processes;Recovery Operations 

NY 36055 31615003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Separation 

Processes;Distillation Operations 

NY 36055 31616002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other 

Operations;General Process Tank Operations 

NY 36055 31616003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other 

Operations;Miscellaneous Manufacturing Operations 

NY 36055 31616004 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other 

Operations;Paint Spraying Operations 

NY 36055 31616006 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other 

Operations;Chemical Weighing Operations 
153

Table VII-9. Summary of Version 3 Mass Emissions and SMOKE Input Files 

S/L Agencies Included 

in Files 

NIF 3.0 File Name 

Containing Mass 

Emissions Inventory 

(Access 2000 Database 

Files) 

Temporal Period of 

Mass Emissions 

Inventory SMOKE Input File Name 

Temporal Period of 

Emissions in 

SMOKE/IDA File 

Point Source Inventory 

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, 

ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA 

(state and Philadelphia, 

and Allegheny Counties), 

RI, VT 

MANEVU_2002_Pt_Versi

on 3_040706.mdb 

Annual, Summer Day, 

and Winter Day 

MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_IN

PUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERD

AY_042706.txt 

Annual and Summer Day

“ “ “ MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_IN

PUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDA

Y_042706.txt 

Annual and Winter Day 

Area Source Inventory 

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, 

ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, 

VT 

MANEVU_2002_Area_04

0606.mdb 

Annual, Summer Day, 

Winter Day, and 

Average Day 

MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_I

NPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMER

DAY_040606.txt 

Annual, Summer Day, 

and Average Day 

“ “ “ MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_I

NPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERD

AY_040606.txt 

Annual, Winter Day, and 

Average Day 

Nonroad Source Inventory

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, 

ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, 

VT 

MANEVU_NRD2002_NIF

_030306.mdb 

Annual MANEVU_NRD2002_SMOK

E_030306.ida 

Annual 

Onroad Source Inventory

CT CT2002MANEVUORCAP

_122004.mdb 

Annual 

DE DE2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb 

Annual 

DC DC2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb 

Annual 

ME ME2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb 

Annual 

MD MD2002MANEVUORCA

P_072004.mdb 

Annual 

MA MA2002MANEVUORCAP

_022006_Access2000.md

b 

MA2002MANEVUORCAP

_022006_Access97.mdb

Annual 

NH NH2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb 

Annual 

NJ NJ2002MANEVUORCAP

_022006_Access2000.md

b 

NJ2002MANEVUORCAP

_022006_Access97.mdb

Annual 

NY NY2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb 

Annual 

PA PA2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb 

Annual 

RI DRI2002MANEVUORCA

P_072004.mdb 

Annual 

VT VT2002MANEVUORCAP

_122004.mdb 

Annual 

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, 

ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, 

VT 

 MANEVU_2002_mbinv_020

22006.txt 

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, 

ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, 

VT 

 MANEVU_2002_mcref_0202

2006.txt 
154

S/L Agencies Included 

in Files 

NIF 3.0 File Name 

Containing Mass 

Emissions Inventory 

(Access 2000 Database 

Files) 

Temporal Period of 

Mass Emissions 

Inventory SMOKE Input File Name 

Temporal Period of 

Emissions in 

SMOKE/IDA File 

DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, PA, 

VT 

 MANEVU_2002_mtpro_0202

2006.txt 

DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, PA, 

VT 

 MANEVU_2002_mtref_0202

2006.txt 

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, 

ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, 

VT 

 MANEVU_2002_mvref_0202

2006.txt 

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, 

ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, 

VT 

 MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02

022006.txt 

 MANEVU_2002_mcodes.txt 

CT, NY MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt 

CT, NY MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt 

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, 

ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, 

VT 

 SMOKE MOBILE6 input 

files—too numerous to list 

individually 

Table VII-10. Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type 

Combinations for Daily Emissions in the MANE-VU 2002 Point and Area Source 

Inventories, Version 3 

Start 

Date End Date 

Emission 

Type 

Emission 

Type Period 

Season 

Designation SMOKE File 

Point Source Inventory 

20011201 20020228 27 NONANNUAL Winter MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt 

20011201 20020228 29 NONANNUAL Winter MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt 

20020101 20020331 27 NONANNUAL Winter MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt 

20020101 20021231 29 NONANNUAL MD-Winter MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt 

 VT-Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt 

20020501 20020930 29 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt 

20020601 20020831 27 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt 

20020601 20020831 29 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt 

20020601 20020831 30 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt 

Area Source Inventory 

20020101 20020831 27 Daily Average Day 

MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt

and 

MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt

20020101 20021231 29 Daily Average Day 

MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt

and 

MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt

 

20020401 20020930 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 

20020401 20021031 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 

20020512 20020512 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 

20020601 20020831 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 

20020601 20020831 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 

20020601 20020929 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 

20020629 20020629 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 

 

20011201 20020228 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 

20011201 20020228 29 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 

20021029 20021029 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 

20021104 20021104 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 

20021205 20021205 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 
155

CHAPTER VIII. METHODS FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE MANE-VU REGION 

Figure VIII-1 shows the geographic area for which the 12-kilometer (km) CMAQ modeling 

domain was used to support air quality modeling for the MANE-VU region. The 36-km domain 

definition was used for geographical areas outside of the area shown in Figure VIII-1. 

Table VIII-1 identifies the geographic region as well as the types of emissions inventory and 

ancillary data used to in modeling for the MANE-VU region. The geographic areas for which 

data were obtained include the Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the 

Southeast (VISTAS), Central Regional Air Planning Organization (CENRAP), and WRAP 

RPOs, the Midwest RPO, Canada, and Mexico. 

 

Figure VIII-1. MANE-VU 12-Kilometer CMAQ Modeling Domain 
156

Table VIII-1. Description of Non-MANE-VU Region Inventory Data Used for MANE-VU Bas

* Only utilized for 2002 BaseA 36-km modeling to generate boundary conditions for BaseA/BaseA1/BaseB current and future year 12-km 

Geographical 

Region/RPO Raw Data 

Time Period and Version 

Number 

Raw Data 

Format Source of Data Source of Ancillary Data 

Date 

Obtaine

VISTAS Point, area, 

nonroad, and mobile 

2002 BaseG SMOKE IDA Gregory Stella, Alpine 

Geophysics 

Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics 

MRPO Point, area, 

nonroad, and mobile 

2002 BaseK SMOKE IDA NIF files provided by Mark 

Janssen, MRPO, and converted to IDA format by Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics 

Part of VISTAS 2002 BaseD provided by Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics 

CENRAP Point, area, 

nonroad, and mobile 

2002 BaseB SMOKE IDA CENRAP ftp site 

Lee Warden, Oklahoma DEQ 

CENRAP ftp site Lee Warden, Oklahoma DEQ 

WRAP * Point, area, 

nonroad, and mobile 

Part of 

VISTAS 

2002 BaseD

SMOKE IDA Part of VISTAS 2002 BaseD 

provided by Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics 

Part of VISTAS 2002 BaseD provided by Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics 

Area, nonroad and mobile 

2000 SMOKE IDA ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory

/canada_2000inventory 

Canada SMOKE 2.1 defaults 

Point 2002 SMOKE IDA 

created by NYSDEC from Canadian NPRI database 

http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/npri/npri_home_e.cfm 

SMOKE 2.1 defaults 

Mexico * Point, area, 

nonroad and mobile 

1999 SMOKE IDA EPA CAIR NODA SMOKE 2.1 defaults 
157

CHAPTER IX. REFERENCES 

CAMD, 2004: 2002 Continuous Emissions Monitoring Data Files downloaded on July 8, 2004 

from the EPA’s Clean Air Markets Division’s website (www.epa.gov/ airmarkets). [Note: 

The files can be found by clicking on Data and Maps on the left panel of the screen, then on 

Data Sets and Published Reports, and then on the first item on the list, Emissions Data 

Prepackaged Datasets (http://cfpub.epa.gov/gdm/index.cfm?fuseaction= 

prepackaged.select). Year 2002 data for the quarterly time period was selected and then 

“Display List” that provides 48 data sets (comma delimited text format) that were 

downloaded one by one and combined into a single dataset.] 

EPA, 2002: Final Summary of the Development and Results of a Methodology for Calculating 

Area Source Emissions from Residential Fuel Combustion, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Emission Factor and Inventory Group, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis 

Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, North 

Carolina. September 2002. 

(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/index.html). 

EPA, 2003a: Enhanced Particulate Matter Controlled Emissions Calculator, User’s Manual, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Factor and Inventory Group, Emissions 

Monitoring and Analysis Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. September 2003. 

EPA, 2003b: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards, Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine, Locomotive, and Other 

Nonroad Components of the National Emissions Inventory, prepared by Eastern Research 

Group, Morrisville, NC, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 2003. 

EPA, 2004a: Basic Format & Content Checker 3.0 (Formerly known as the Quality Assurance / 

Quality Control Software 3.0) - March 2004; Extended Quality Control Tool - Updated 

May 18, 2004. Available at the following EPA website: 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/nif/index.html#nei. 

EPA, 2004b: NEI Quality Assurance and Data Augmentation for Point Sources, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Emission 

Factor and Inventory Group, May 26, 2004. 

EPA, 2004c: Factor Information and REtrieval (FIRE) Data System, Version 6.24, located on 

the Technology Transfer Network Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emission Factors Web 

Site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/fire/index.html. March 2004. 

EPA, 2005a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final NONROAD2005 [computer 

software], Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor, MI. Available December 

2005 at: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/nonroadmdl.htm. 
158

EPA, 2005b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Mobile Inventory Model, 

NMIM2005 [computer software], Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor, 

MI. Available December 2005 at: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/nmim.htm. 

ERG, 2004: Environmental Research Group, Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine, 

Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components of the National Emissions Inventory, 

technical memorandum prepared by Eastern Research Group, Morrisville, NC, for the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, September 2004. 

MANE-VU, 2003: Quality Assurance Plan for Development of a 2002 Mobile Source 

Emissions Inventory for the MANE-VU States, Final. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & 

Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU). January 

31, 2003. 

MANE-VU, 2004a: Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for Area and Point Source 

Emissions Modeling Inventory Project, Final. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & 

Associates, Inc. and Carolina Environmental Program for the MidAtlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU). August 3, 2004. 

MANE-VU, 2004b: Summary of Approaches Available for Fugitive Dust Sources, 

Final. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast 

Visibility Union (MANE-VU). July 15, 2004. 

MANE-VU, 2004c: Summary of Approaches Available for Wildfires, Prescribed 

Burning, Slash Burning, and Agricultural Field Burning, Draft. Prepared by E.H. 

Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union 

(MANE-VU). July 24, 2004. 

MANE-VU, 2005: Area and Point Source Emissions Modeling Inventory Project, Prepared by 

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANEVU). January 31, 2005. 

Thompson, 2002: Thompson, Rhonda L., “A Demonstration of the Quality Assurance (QA) 

software specifically developed for the National Emission Inventory (NEI),” presented at 

the International Emission Inventory Conference “Emission Inventories - Partnering for 

the Future,” Atlanta, GA, April 15-18, 2002, (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/conference/ 

ei11/qa/thompson.pdf). 

WRAP, 2005: Western Governors’ Association, Western Regional Air Partnership, “Analysis of 

the Fine Fraction of Particulate Matter in Fugitive Dust,” Final Report, October 12, 2005 

(http://www.wrapair.org/forums/dejf/index.html). 
A-1

APPENDIX A 

POINT SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: 

DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT 

[NOTE: The Appendix A table for each State is provided in a separate MS Word file because of 

the large size of each table. The Word files are provided in the zip file named “Appendix A.zip”; 

this zip file also includes an Excel Workbook file that contains the spreadsheet from which the 

Word file was created for each State.]
B-1

APPENDIX B 

AREA SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: 

DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT 

[NOTE: The Appendix B table for each State is provided in a separate MS Word file because of 

the large size of each table. The Word files are provided in the zip file named “Appendix B.zip”; 

this zip file also includes an Excel Workbook file that contains the spreadsheet from which the 

Word file was created for each State.]
C-1 

APPENDIX C 

NONROAD SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: 

FINAL COUNTY, MONTHLY NATIONAL 

MOBILE INVENTORY MODEL (NMIM) INPUTS 

CONTENTS 

CONNECTICUT ........................................................................................................................ C-2 

DELAWARE .............................................................................................................................. C-2 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ...................................................................................................... C-3 

MAINE ....................................................................................................................................... C-3 

MARYLAND ............................................................................................................................. C-4 

MASSACHUSETTS................................................................................................................... C-6 

NEW HAMPSHIRE ................................................................................................................... C-7 

NEW JERSEY ............................................................................................................................ C-7 

NEW YORK ............................................................................................................................... C-9 

PENNSYLVANIA.................................................................................................................... C-13 

RHODE ISLAND ..................................................................................................................... C-17 

VERMONT............................................................................................................................... C-18 
C-2 

Table C-1. MANE-VU County, Monthly NMIM/NONROAD Inputs 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

09 CONNECTICUT 

RVP, psi 

001 Fairfield County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 003 Hartford County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 

005 Litchfield County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 

007 Middlesex County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 

009 New Haven County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 

011 New London County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 

013 Tolland County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 015 Windham County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Fairfield County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8003 Hartford County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6

005 Litchfield County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6

007 Middlesex County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6009 New Haven County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6011 New London County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6

013 Tolland County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6

015 Windham County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Fairfield County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 10003 Hartford County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 10

005 Litchfield County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 10

007 Middlesex County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 10

009 New Haven County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 10011 New London County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 10

013 Tolland County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 10015 Windham County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 10

10 DELAWARE 

RVP, psi 

001 Kent County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 

003 New Castle County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 

005 Sussex County 13.4 13.4 10.4 10.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Kent County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0003 New Castle County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0

005 Sussex County 1.4645 1.4645 1.5538 1.5538 1.6431 1.6431 1.6431 1.6

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Kent County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 13003 New Castle County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 13005 Sussex County 225.0 225.0 186.0 186.0 134.0 134.0 134.0 13
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-3 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

11 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

RVP, psi 

001 District of Columbia 13.1 13.1 10.4 10.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 District of Columbia 1.7681 1.7681 1.8217 1.8217 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 District of Columbia 230.0 230.0 199.6 199.6 159.0 159.0 159.0 15

23 MAINE 

RVP, psi 

001 Androscoggin County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 

003 Aroostook County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 

005 Cumberland County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 

007 Franklin County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 009 Hancock County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 011 Kennebec County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 013 Knox County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 

015 Lincoln County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 017 Oxford County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 

019 Penobscot County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 

021 Piscataquis County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 

023 Sagadahoc County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 

025 Somerset County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 027 Waldo County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 

029 Washington County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 

031 York County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Androscoggin County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6003 Aroostook County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5005 Cumberland County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6

007 Franklin County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5

009 Hancock County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5

011 Kennebec County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6

013 Knox County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6

015 Lincoln County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6

017 Oxford County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5

019 Penobscot County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5021 Piscataquis County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5023 Sagadahoc County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6025 Somerset County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5

027 Waldo County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5

029 Washington County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5

031 York County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Androscoggin County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 8003 Aroostook County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 29

005 Cumberland County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 8

007 Franklin County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 29
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-4 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

009 Hancock County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 29

23 MAINE (cont’d) 011 Kennebec County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 8

013 Knox County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 8015 Lincoln County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 8

017 Oxford County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 29

019 Penobscot County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 29021 Piscataquis County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 29023 Sagadahoc County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 8025 Somerset County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 29027 Waldo County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 29

029 Washington County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 29031 York County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 8

24 MARYLAND 

RVP, psi 

003 Anne Arundel County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

005 Baltimore County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 009 Calvert County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

011 Caroline County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 013 Carroll County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

015 Cecil County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

017 Charles County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

019 Dorchester County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 

021 Frederick County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 023 Garrett County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 

025 Harford County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

027 Howard County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

029 Kent County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

031 Montgomery County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

033 Prince George's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

035 Queen Anne's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

037 St. Mary's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 

039 Somerset County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 041 Talbot County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 

043 Washington County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 

045 Wicomico County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 047 Worcester County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 510 Baltimore city 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Allegany County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.003 Anne Arundel County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

005 Baltimore County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.009 Calvert County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

011 Caroline County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

013 Carroll County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

015 Cecil County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

017 Charles County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

019 Dorchester County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

021 Frederick County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-5 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

023 Garrett County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

24 MARYLAND (cont’d) 025 Harford County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

027 Howard County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

029 Kent County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

031 Montgomery County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

033 Prince George's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.035 Queen Anne's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

037 St. Mary's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

039 Somerset County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

041 Talbot County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

043 Washington County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

045 Wicomico County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

047 Worcester County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

510 Baltimore city 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Allegany County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 17003 Anne Arundel County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

005 Baltimore County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

009 Calvert County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

011 Caroline County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 17

013 Carroll County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

015 Cecil County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12017 Charles County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12019 Dorchester County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 17021 Frederick County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

023 Garrett County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 17

025 Harford County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12027 Howard County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

029 Kent County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12031 Montgomery County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

033 Prince George's County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12035 Queen Anne's County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

037 St. Mary's County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 17039 Somerset County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 17

041 Talbot County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 17

043 Washington County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 17

045 Wicomico County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 17

047 Worcester County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 17510 Baltimore city 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-6 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

25 MASSACHUSETTS

RVP, psi 

001 Barnstable County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 

003 Berkshire County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 

005 Bristol County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 007 Dukes County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 

009 Essex County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 

011 Franklin County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 

013 Hampden County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 015 Hampshire County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 

017 Middlesex County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 

019 Nantucket County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 

021 Norfolk County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 023 Plymouth County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 

025 Suffolk County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 027 Worcester County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Barnstable County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.003 Berkshire County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.005 Bristol County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

007 Dukes County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

009 Essex County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

011 Franklin County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

013 Hampden County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

015 Hampshire County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.017 Middlesex County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.019 Nantucket County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.021 Norfolk County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

023 Plymouth County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

025 Suffolk County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

027 Worcester County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Barnstable County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12003 Berkshire County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

005 Bristol County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

007 Dukes County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12009 Essex County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12011 Franklin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

013 Hampden County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

015 Hampshire County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

017 Middlesex County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12019 Nantucket County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12021 Norfolk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

023 Plymouth County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

025 Suffolk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

027 Worcester County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-7 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

33 NEW HAMPSHIRE 

RVP, psi 

001 Belknap County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 

003 Carroll County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 005 Cheshire County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 

007 Coos County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 

009 Grafton County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 011 Hillsborough County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 

013 Merrimack County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 

015 Rockingham County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 

017 Strafford County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 

019 Sullivan County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Belknap County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2003 Carroll County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2

005 Cheshire County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2

007 Coos County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2

009 Grafton County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2

011 Hillsborough County 1.8217 1.8217 1.9110 1.9110 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0

013 Merrimack County 1.8217 1.8217 1.9110 1.9110 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0015 Rockingham County 1.9825 1.9825 2.0539 2.0539 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.

017 Strafford County 1.9825 1.9825 2.0539 2.0539 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.019 Sullivan County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Belknap County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 18003 Carroll County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 18005 Cheshire County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 18

007 Coos County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 18009 Grafton County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 18

011 Hillsborough County 121.0 121.0 101.3 101.3 75.0 75.0 75.0 7

013 Merrimack County 121.0 121.0 101.3 101.3 75.0 75.0 75.0 7

015 Rockingham County 148.0 148.0 121.0 121.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 8

017 Strafford County 148.0 148.0 121.0 121.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 8

019 Sullivan County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 18

34 NEW JERSEY 

RVP, psi 

001 Atlantic County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 

003 Bergen County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 005 Burlington County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 

007 Camden County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 009 Cape May County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 

011 Cumberland County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 

013 Essex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 

015 Gloucester County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 

017 Hudson County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 019 Hunterdon County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 

021 Mercer County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 023 Middlesex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-8 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

34 NEW JERSEY 025 Monmouth County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 

(cont’d) 027 Morris County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 

029 Ocean County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 

031 Passaic County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 033 Salem County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 

035 Somerset County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 

037 Sussex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 039 Union County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 

041 Warren County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Atlantic County 1.6922 1.6922 1.8499 1.8499 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0003 Bergen County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8

005 Burlington County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0

007 Camden County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0

009 Cape May County 1.6922 1.6922 1.8499 1.8499 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0

011 Cumberland County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0

013 Essex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8

015 Gloucester County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0

017 Hudson County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8

019 Hunterdon County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8021 Mercer County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0

023 Middlesex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8025 Monmouth County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8

027 Morris County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8

029 Ocean County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8

031 Passaic County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8

033 Salem County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0

035 Somerset County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8

037 Sussex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8

039 Union County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8

041 Warren County 1.8753 1.8753 1.9110 1.9110 1.9825 1.9825 1.9825 1.9

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Atlantic County 207.0 207.0 174.0 174.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 13003 Bergen County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11

005 Burlington County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 13

007 Camden County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 13

009 Cape May County 207.0 207.0 174.0 174.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 13011 Cumberland County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 13

013 Essex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11015 Gloucester County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 13017 Hudson County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11

019 Hunterdon County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11021 Mercer County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 13

023 Middlesex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11025 Monmouth County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11027 Morris County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11

029 Ocean County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11

031 Passaic County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-9 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

34 NEW JERSEY 033 Salem County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 13

(cont’d) 035 Somerset County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11

037 Sussex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11

039 Union County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 11

041 Warren County 125.0 125.0 123.7 123.7 122.0 122.0 122.0 12

36 NEW YORK 

RVP, psi 

001 Albany County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

003 Allegany County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

005 Bronx County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 

007 Broome County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 009 Cattaraugus County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

011 Cayuga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

013 Chautauqua County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

015 Chemung County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 017 Chenango County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

019 Clinton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 021 Columbia County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

023 Cortland County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

025 Delaware County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

027 Dutchess County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

029 Erie County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

031 Essex County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

033 Franklin County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

035 Fulton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 037 Genesee County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 039 Greene County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 041 Hamilton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

043 Herkimer County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

045 Jefferson County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

047 Kings County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 

049 Lewis County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

051 Livingston County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

053 Madison County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 055 Monroe County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 057 Montgomery County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

059 Nassau County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 

061 New York County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 063 Niagara County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 065 Oneida County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 067 Onondaga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

069 Ontario County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 071 Orange County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 

073 Orleans County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 075 Oswego County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 077 Otsego County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 079 Putnam County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 

081 Queens County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-10 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

36 NEW YORK 083 Rensselaer County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

(cont’d) 085 Richmond County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 

087 Rockland County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 089 St. Lawrence County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

091 Saratoga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

093 Schenectady County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

095 Schoharie County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

097 Schuyler County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

099 Seneca County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 101 Steuben County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 103 Suffolk County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 105 Sullivan County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

107 Tioga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

109 Tompkins County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

111 Ulster County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 113 Warren County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 115 Washington County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

117 Wayne County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

119 Westchester County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 

121 Wyoming County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 123 Yates County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Albany County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9003 Allegany County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

005 Bronx County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8

007 Broome County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

009 Cattaraugus County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9011 Cayuga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

013 Chautauqua County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9

015 Chemung County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

017 Chenango County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

019 Clinton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

021 Columbia County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

023 Cortland County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

025 Delaware County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

027 Dutchess County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

029 Erie County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9

031 Essex County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

033 Franklin County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

035 Fulton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

037 Genesee County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

039 Greene County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

041 Hamilton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

043 Herkimer County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

045 Jefferson County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9047 Kings County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8

049 Lewis County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

051 Livingston County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

053 Madison County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-11 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

36 NEW YORK 055 Monroe County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

(cont’d) 057 Montgomery County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

059 Nassau County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8

061 New York County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8

063 Niagara County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9

065 Oneida County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

067 Onondaga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

069 Ontario County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

071 Orange County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8

073 Orleans County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

075 Oswego County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

077 Otsego County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

079 Putnam County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8

081 Queens County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8

083 Rensselaer County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

085 Richmond County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8

087 Rockland County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8

089 St. Lawrence County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

091 Saratoga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

093 Schenectady County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9095 Schoharie County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

097 Schuyler County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

099 Seneca County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

101 Steuben County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

103 Suffolk County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8

105 Sullivan County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

107 Tioga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

109 Tompkins County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

111 Ulster County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

113 Warren County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

115 Washington County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

117 Wayne County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

119 Westchester County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8121 Wyoming County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

123 Yates County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Albany County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29003 Allegany County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

005 Bronx County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19

007 Broome County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

009 Cattaraugus County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29011 Cayuga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

013 Chautauqua County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

015 Chemung County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29017 Chenango County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

019 Clinton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

021 Columbia County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

023 Cortland County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29025 Delaware County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-12 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

36 NEW YORK 027 Dutchess County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

(cont’d) 029 Erie County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

031 Essex County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29033 Franklin County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

035 Fulton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

037 Genesee County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

039 Greene County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

041 Hamilton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29043 Herkimer County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29045 Jefferson County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29047 Kings County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19

049 Lewis County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29051 Livingston County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29053 Madison County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29055 Monroe County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

057 Montgomery County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

059 Nassau County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19

061 New York County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19063 Niagara County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

065 Oneida County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

067 Onondaga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29069 Ontario County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

071 Orange County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19

073 Orleans County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

075 Oswego County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

077 Otsego County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

079 Putnam County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19

081 Queens County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19

083 Rensselaer County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

085 Richmond County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19

087 Rockland County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19089 St. Lawrence County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

091 Saratoga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

093 Schenectady County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29095 Schoharie County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29097 Schuyler County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29099 Seneca County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

101 Steuben County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

103 Suffolk County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19105 Sullivan County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

107 Tioga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

109 Tompkins County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

111 Ulster County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

113 Warren County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

115 Washington County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

117 Wayne County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29119 Westchester County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 19

121 Wyoming County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29

123 Yates County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 29
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-13 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

42 PENNSYLVANIA 

RVP, psi 

001 Adams County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

003 Allegheny County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 

005 Armstrong County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 

007 Beaver County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 009 Bedford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 011 Berks County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

013 Blair County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

015 Bradford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

017 Bucks County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 

019 Butler County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 021 Cambria County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 023 Cameron County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 025 Carbon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 027 Centre County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 029 Chester County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 031 Clarion County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 033 Clearfield County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

035 Clinton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 037 Columbia County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

039 Crawford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

041 Cumberland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

043 Dauphin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 045 Delaware County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 

047 Elk County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

049 Erie County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

051 Fayette County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 053 Forest County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 055 Franklin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

057 Fulton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 059 Greene County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 061 Huntingdon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

063 Indiana County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 065 Jefferson County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

067 Juniata County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 069 Lackawanna County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

071 Lancaster County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

073 Lawrence County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

075 Lebanon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 077 Lehigh County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 079 Luzerne County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 081 Lycoming County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

083 McKean County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 085 Mercer County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 087 Mifflin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 089 Monroe County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 091 Montgomery County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 

093 Montour County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-14 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

42 PENNSYLVANIA 095 Northampton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

(cont’d) 097 Northumberland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

099 Perry County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

101 Philadelphia County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 

103 Pike County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

105 Potter County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 107 Schuylkill County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

109 Snyder County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 111 Somerset County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

113 Sullivan County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

115 Susquehanna County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

117 Tioga County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

119 Union County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

121 Venango County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 123 Warren County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 125 Washington County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 

127 Wayne County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

129 Westmoreland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 

131 Wyoming County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

133 York County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Adams County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2003 Allegheny County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2005 Armstrong County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2007 Beaver County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

009 Bedford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

011 Berks County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

013 Blair County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

015 Bradford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

017 Bucks County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

019 Butler County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

021 Cambria County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

023 Cameron County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

025 Carbon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

027 Centre County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

029 Chester County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

031 Clarion County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

033 Clearfield County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

035 Clinton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

037 Columbia County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

039 Crawford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

041 Cumberland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

043 Dauphin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

045 Delaware County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

047 Elk County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2049 Erie County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

051 Fayette County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

053 Forest County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

055 Franklin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-15 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

42 PENNSYLVANIA 057 Fulton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

(cont’d) 059 Greene County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

061 Huntingdon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

063 Indiana County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

065 Jefferson County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

067 Juniata County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

069 Lackawanna County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

071 Lancaster County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

073 Lawrence County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

075 Lebanon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

077 Lehigh County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

079 Luzerne County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

081 Lycoming County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

083 McKean County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

085 Mercer County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

087 Mifflin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

089 Monroe County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

091 Montgomery County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

093 Montour County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

095 Northampton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2097 Northumberland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

099 Perry County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

101 Philadelphia County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.

103 Pike County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

105 Potter County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

107 Schuylkill County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

109 Snyder County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

111 Somerset County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

113 Sullivan County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

115 Susquehanna County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2117 Tioga County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

119 Union County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

121 Venango County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

123 Warren County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

125 Washington County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

127 Wayne County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

129 Westmoreland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

131 Wyoming County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

133 York County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Adams County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27003 Allegheny County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

005 Armstrong County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27007 Beaver County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

009 Bedford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

011 Berks County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27013 Blair County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27015 Bradford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

017 Bucks County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-16 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

42 PENNSYLVANIA 019 Butler County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

(cont’d) 021 Cambria County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

023 Cameron County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

025 Carbon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

027 Centre County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

029 Chester County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

031 Clarion County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27033 Clearfield County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27035 Clinton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27037 Columbia County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

039 Crawford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27041 Cumberland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

043 Dauphin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27045 Delaware County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

047 Elk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

049 Erie County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

051 Fayette County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

053 Forest County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

055 Franklin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27057 Fulton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

059 Greene County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

061 Huntingdon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

063 Indiana County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27065 Jefferson County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

067 Juniata County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

069 Lackawanna County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27071 Lancaster County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

073 Lawrence County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27075 Lebanon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

077 Lehigh County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

079 Luzerne County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

081 Lycoming County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

083 McKean County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

085 Mercer County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

087 Mifflin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

089 Monroe County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

091 Montgomery County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

093 Montour County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27095 Northampton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

097 Northumberland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27099 Perry County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

101 Philadelphia County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12

103 Pike County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

105 Potter County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

107 Schuylkill County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

109 Snyder County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

111 Somerset County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27113 Sullivan County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27115 Susquehanna County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-17 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

42 PENNSYLVANIA 117 Tioga County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

(cont’d) 119 Union County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

121 Venango County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

123 Warren County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

125 Washington County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

127 Wayne County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27129 Westmoreland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

131 Wyoming County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27133 York County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 27

44 RHODE ISLAND 

RVP, psi 

001 Bristol County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 

003 Kent County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 

005 Newport County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 007 Providence County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 

009 Washington County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Bristol County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6003 Kent County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6

005 Newport County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6

007 Providence County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6

009 Washington County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Bristol County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 13003 Kent County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 13

005 Newport County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 13

007 Providence County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 13009 Washington County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 13
Table C-1 (continued) 

C-18 

FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL A

50 VERMONT 

RVP, psi 

001 Addison County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 

003 Bennington County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 005 Caledonia County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 

007 Chittenden County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 009 Essex County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 

011 Franklin County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 

013 Grand Isle County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 015 Lamoille County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 

017 Orange County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 

019 Orleans County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 

021 Rutland County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 

023 Washington County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 025 Windham County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 

027 Windsor County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 

Oxygen Weight Percent 

001 Addison County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2003 Bennington County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

005 Caledonia County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2007 Chittenden County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

009 Essex County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

011 Franklin County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

013 Grand Isle County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

015 Lamoille County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

017 Orange County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

019 Orleans County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

021 Rutland County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

023 Washington County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

025 Windham County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

027 Windsor County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2

Gasoline Sulfur, ppm 

001 Addison County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18003 Bennington County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18005 Caledonia County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18

007 Chittenden County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18

009 Essex County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18011 Franklin County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18

013 Grand Isle County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18

015 Lamoille County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18

017 Orange County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18

019 Orleans County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18

021 Rutland County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18023 Washington County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18025 Windham County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18027 Windsor County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 18