alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 12/31/96
INCOME STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,978,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                    98,721
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,347,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,386,196
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        46,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     932,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,347,002
<SALES>                                         26,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               772,664
<CGS>                                           22,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  238,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                66,529
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             201,543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                266,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                    86,855
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            179,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   179,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Discovery Oil, Ltd, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, M. Jeanett Ippolito, Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ M. Jeanett Ippolito

By  ____________________________________

M. Jeanett Ippolito

Secretary

Date:  May 15, 2009





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. and will be retained by Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1703.5 Interpretation.

Any questions concerning interpretation of this Regulation shall be referred to the OGC for resolution.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 134086 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134086 COA: 273562 Wayne CC: 03-012989 ROBERT LEE JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 25, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Veritas DGC
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
David B. Robson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               1.   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
                    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                    1934; and

               2.   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
                    in all material respects, the financial condition and
                    results of operations of the Company.

June 13, 2003
                                              /s/ David B. Robson
                                              -------------------
                                              David B. Robson
                                              Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning                           ( print page 318)                        individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Biobehavioral and Behavioral Sciences Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         February 25, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NIH/NACHHD 6710B, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Clay Mash, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Rm. 2131A, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6866,                         *mashc@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 29, 2020.

Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-29118 Filed 1-4-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### GROVER v. NORRIS

No. 389P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 829

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 27, 2019

p1120

Order 

Clerk

November 27, 2019

157370

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 157370

COA: 325627

Wayne CC: 14-003019-FC

FERNANDUS CORTEZ ELLEN,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

By order of July 3, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Dixon-Bey (Docket No. 156746). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been 

denied in Dixon-Bey on July 29, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again 

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REVERSE the Court of Appeals judgment finding that the trial court failed to explain 

why the extent of the guidelines departure was warranted, and remanding this case to the 

trial court for resentencing. The trial court adequately described the circumstances 

surrounding the offense as being at the most serious end of the spectrum of manslaughter 

cases and the defendant’s efforts to silence witnesses, thereby warranting the most severe 

sentence permitted. The principle of proportionality was satisfied and the trial court did 

not abuse its discretion.
### §40704. Research program on perceived impact of sonic booms

(a) Establishment.—The Administrator shall establish a cooperative research program with industry, including the conduct of flight demonstrations in a relevant environment, to collect data on the perceived impact of sonic booms. The data could enable the promulgation of appropriate standards for overland commercial supersonic flight operations.

(b) Coordination.—The Administrator shall ensure that sonic boom research is coordinated as appropriate with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, and as appropriate make use of the expertise of the Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction Center of Excellence sponsored by the Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3391.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40704(a) | 42 U.S.C. 17723(b). | Pub. L. 110–422, title III, §304(b), (c), Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4787. |
| 40704(b) | 42 U.S.C. 17723(c). | |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Purpose

Pub. L. 110–422, title III, §304(a), Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4787, provided that: "The ability to fly commercial aircraft over land at supersonic speeds without adverse impacts on the environment or on local communities would open new markets and enable new transportation capabilities. In order to have the basis for establishing appropriate sonic boom standards for such flight operations, a research program is needed to assess the impact in a relevant environment of commercial supersonic flight operations."
Exhibit 1.4



                                    Autoriteit
                                    Financiet Markten
















Form for the disclosure of securities transactions
in the own issuing institution

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
Form for the disclosure of securities transactions in the own issuing institution



Part 1

<S>                                                               <C>
1.   Name of issuing institution:                                 New Skies Satellites N.V.

2.   Name of person obliged to notify:                            New Skies Satellites N.V.


Sort of security
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3.   Sort of security:                                            Ordinary shares

     (Share/Bond/Option/Warrant/other)

4.   To be filled out if applicable:

               Nominal value of the security:                     0.05 EUR

               Optional series (call option/put option):

               Exercise price:

               Expiration date:


Transaction in the security indicated in questions 3 and 4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


5.   Date of the transaction:                                     10-03-03

6a.  Number of securities acquired in the transaction:            1,747

 b.  Number of securities sold in the transaction:

7.   Price of the securities:                                     3.75EUR

8.   Open/Close (in case of options)











To the best of my knowledge and belief I certify that the information set forth
in this statement is true, complete and correct:


Andrew R. D'Uva Compliance Officer of New Skies Satellites N.V.,
----------------------------------------------------------------
Name

Rooseveltplantsoen 4                                              11 March 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------  -----------------------------
Address                                                           Date

2517 KR The Hague
----------------------------------------------------------------  -----------------------------
Postal code & city & country                                      Signature
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### MESA AIRLINES, INC

.

-----------------------------------------------------------



### NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On August 21 , 2013

, Mesa Airlines, Inc. (“ Mesa ”)

, a U.S

. certificated air carrier, 1

request ed that the Department regist e r the trade name “ American Eagle ” for use in

certain air transportation operations

.

Part 215 (14 CFR Part 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier

wishing to use an alternative trade name must first register that name with the

Department. The rule further states that the Department may register such name after the

air carrier gives notification to similarly named air carriers of the proposed use of the

name. Part 215 also recognizes that the Department may intervene in the registration of a

trade name should there be evidence of a significant potential for, or of actual, public

confusion.

Mesa states that it has been authorized by American Airlines, Inc. (“American”) and

American Eagle Airlines, Inc. to use the American Eagle trade name in conjunction with

its code sharing relationship with American. In addition, Mesa states American

acknowledges that any applicable disclosures of the ident ity of the operating air carrier

and trade name in accordance with the provisions of Part 257 of the Department’s

regulations (14 CFR Part 257) will be made.

Since Mesa has complied with the requirements of Part 215 and based on the facts here,

we acknowl edge the registration of the trade name “American Eagle” for use in Mesa ’s

operations, effective as of the closing of the merger between American Airlines, Inc. and

US Airways, Inc. (“Effective Date”).

This authorization is effective for one year from the Effective Date, and is conditioned on

Mesa ’ s agreement that, prior to the expiration of the one year term, it will confer with the

Department to discuss whether there is any public confusion in connection with the use of

1 Mesa ’s i nterstate certificate was last re issued by Order 98

- 7

- 6

, on July 8

, 1998

.2

the trade name of “American Eagle” by one of the Amer ican Eagle carriers and whether

an extension of the authorization is needed or warranted.

Dated at Washington, D.C.

, November 27 , 2013.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http:// www.regulations.govAttachment A

SE RVICE LIST FOR MESA AIRLINES, INC.

MR ROBERT E COHN

MR PATRICK R RIZZI

COUNSEL FOR MESA AIRLINES, INC

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

COLUMBIA SQUARE

555 THIRTEENTH STREET NW

WASHINGTON DC 20004 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR STEVEN D. D’URSO

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION MR MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION MANAGE R

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

MR PETER LYNCH

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR E NFORCEMENT

FAA / AGC

- 300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591
Exhibit 10.32


 


BIOSANTE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


 


DESCRIPTION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR


COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS


 


 


Retainer and Meeting Fees. Except as described below, each of our
non-employee directors is paid a $20,000 annual retainer and $1,000 for each board
or committee meeting attended in person and $500 for each board or committee
meeting attended via telephone. Our Chairman of the Board is paid a $45,000
annual retainer and our Chairman of the Audit and Finance Committee is a paid a
$25,000 annual retainer.


 


Stock Options. Non-employee directors are granted options
to purchase shares of BioSante common stock from time to time in the sole
discretion of the board of directors.


 


Reimbursement of Expenses. Non-employee directors are reimbursed for
actual expenses, include travel expenses, incurred in attending board and
committee meetings.
No. 89-1056.

#### Department of Health Services of California et al. *v.*Citizens Action League et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------




               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T


March 22, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, CAS Medical
Systems, Inc. has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP
("Andersen") stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to
this audit.

Very truly yours,


/s/ CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
----------------------------
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
#### Manuel Barcelo, Respondent, v. Horn & Hardart Company et al., Defendants, and Harlem River Truckmen & Riggers, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment appealed from is unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial is ordered, with costs to abide the event. Upon a prior appeal in this case we held that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the credible evidence. The additional evidence introduced by plaintiff upon the second trial was so insignificant and insubstantial that a similar disposition of this appeal is dictated. We again hold that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the credible evidence. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Anna Brener, Deceased. Sidney S. Levine, as Executor of Anna Brener, Deceased, Respondent; Max Katz of Toronto, Canada, Appellant.

Appellant is directed to join Max Katz of New York as respondent in this appeal and to serve on him and file with the Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County, notice of the appeal; to serve upon said party the record on appeal and appellant’s brief; and to serve and file with the Clerk of this court notice of reargument with proof of service thereof on the respondent on or before November 14, 1960. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 289; *Smith*v. *Havens Relief Soc., infra.)*Upon appellant’s failure to comply with this order, the appeal shall be dismissed. The appeal is set down for reargument on November 22, 1960, by which date the brief of respondent Max Katz of New York shall be served and filed. The executor respondent urges dismissal of this appeal because the appellant has omitted to serve the notice of appeal upon and to join Max Katz of New York as respondent. Max Katz of New York appeared below *pro se*and is the appellant’s assignee. This appeal involves the validity of the assignment to Max Katz of New York made by the appellant Max Katz of Toronto. We are of the opinion that Max Katz of New York is a necessary party. It does not appear that appellant’s time to appeal as to Max Katz of New York has expired. *(Kilmer*v. *Hathorn,*78 N. Y. 228; *O’Brien*v. *City of New York,*6 A D 2d 63; *Smith*v. *Havens Relief Fund Soc.,*115 App. Div. 185.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER II—QUOTA PROVISIONS
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Ancientnovae and meteor showers.**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:2/6
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001057950
 
May 23, 2018
Exhibit
32
 
 FNB
UNITED CORP.
 
 Certification
of Periodic Financial Report
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of FNB United Corp. (the
“Company”) certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in that Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 
 Dated:  March
      16, 2009
                    
                    /s/Michael
      C. MillerMichael
      C. MillerChief
      Executive OfficerDated:  March
      16, 2009
                    
                    /s/Mark
      A SeversonMark
      A. SeversonChief
      Financial Officer
 
 
 *This
certificate is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the
knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.