alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MULLER v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Street Railroads—Crossing Accident—Negligence—Contributory Negligence—Jury Questions.

Evidence in an action for injuries by the driver of a wagon struck by defendant street railway company’s car at a crossing *held*to justify the submission to the jury of the issues of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence.

MacLean, J., dissenting.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh District.

Action by Christian Muller against the Interurban Street Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

H. A. Robinson (Arthur K. Wing and Wm. E. Weaver, of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph I. Green, for respondent.

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

The action is for While the plaintiff may have been somewhat confused on cross-examination, still his evidence shows that when his horses got onto the west track of defendant he saw the car a block away on the same track. He was driving slowly. He had his horses over the west track, onto the east track, when he looked again, and saw the car half a block away. Before he could get the hiiid part of his wagon over the west track, the car struck the wagon, and caused the injuries complained of. The evidence was such that the question of the negligence of defendant’s servant in charge of the car and of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence was a proper one for the jury. The charge of the learned justice was a correct statement of the law applicable to the case. We can find no reason for disturbing the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

FREEDMAN, P..J., concurs.

MacLEAN, J. (dissenting).

The plaintiff, driving an empty two-horse stone truck easterly through mth street, was struck on Second avenue by a south-bound car of the defendant, and in this action charged his injuries upon the defendant. That he looked and saw the car before he got upon its track is clear, but not his direct testimony to where and when. Upon his cross-examination he testified that he saw the car at 112th street as soon as he came out from the house line; that the distance from the first rail to the edge of the street was 43 feet, and he saw the car when he commenced to drive the 43 feet; that his horses were walking, and the car was coming extremely fast, and he kept right on, watching it all the time, and if the motorman did not stop the car he knew he would get struck. The collision occurring at a point where the parties had similar rights and *235similar" düties, the plaintiff might not impose greater duties upon the defendant, or assume for himself superior rights, or recover when the fault of the defendant but equals his own. •

Judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0356 

Focus Ready Draft 4/9/2015

 

ENGINEER: Avcin \ AFD 

 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Ventilation system/Suitable gloves/Eye protection/Long 

sleeve protective clothing

Respirator: If ventilation is insufficient, wear 

respiratoryprotection.

Health Effects: Flammable/May cause respiratory irritation

TLV/PEL:

None established. 

 

 

 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (04/02/2015):

Almost same as 

; Bottom structure same as .

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 
Migration to groundwater: Negligible 

PBT rating: P3B2T1 

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation 

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb) 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0356 

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide 

with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.


 

 

 

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0356 

 

 
 

es
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 EAGLEPICHER HOLDINGS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of EaglePicher Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Thomas R. Pilholski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1984; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Thomas R. Pilholski
    
    Date: April 5, 2004Thomas R. Pilholski, Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
### Part G—Appeals to Courts and Other Review
July 1, 2015

Meredith Kurpius, PhD Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office USEPA Region 9 75 Hawthorne St., Mail Code: AIR-7 San Francisco, CA 94105

Dear Ms. Kurpius,

Please find attached the 2015 Ambient Air Monitoring Ne twork Plan (ANP) for the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District. In order to s atisfy the requirements for public review and comment specified in 40 CFR 58.10, a notice was placed o n our homepage ( http://www.slocleanair.org ) from June 1 to June 30 announcing the availability o f this document and soliciting public comment. One comment was received and it is attached to this letter along with our response. No changes were made to the ANP as a res ult of this comment, and the attached ANP is identical to that posted for review.

Please contact myself or Jaime Contreras if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Karl Tupper Air Quality Specialist – Monitoring Division San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control Distri ct Ph: 805.781.4645 Email: ktupper@co.slo.ca.us

cc: Dena Vallano, EPA Region 9 Gwen Yoshimura, EPA Region 9 Gayle Sweigert, California Air Resources Board Aeron Arlin-Genet, SLOCAPCD
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT**

**REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-3 (Nos. 333-44204, 333-34648, 33-86930, 33-90392, 33-96620, 33-97490, and 333-132447) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-45118, 333-40508, 333-44212, 33-41027, 333-142980, 333-13387, 333-13359, 333-13357, 333-56244, 333-48110, 333-35276, 333-34622,333-94999, 333-92885, 333-87039, 333-55983, 333-55991, 333-34671, 333-81414, 333-102747, 33-88992, 333-133830, 333-115123, 333-128427, 333-152966 and 333-159174) of our reports dated February 24, 2010 relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedules of PMC-Sierra Inc. (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of *Financial Accounting Standards Codification 470-20-65,Debt Topic for the Accounting of Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlements)*),** and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of PMC-Sierra Inc. for the year ended December 27, 2009. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Independent Registered Public Accountants 

Vancouver, Canada 

February 24, 2010
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2*


                           Section 1350 Certification


         I, Steven G. Larson, the chief financial officer of Drexler Technology
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certify pursuant to section
1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge:

         (i)   the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and

         (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    November 14, 2003


/s/ Steven G. Larson
--------------------
Steven G. Larson


-----------------------

*  The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed "filed" with the
   SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
   under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
   whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general
   incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 13.1


CertificationPursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(a) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S.A. de C.V., asociedad anónima de capital variableorganized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: June 22, 2005 |                                                        
|------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                    | /s/ Adolfo Castro Rivas                                
|                    | Name: Adolfo Castro RivasTitle: Chief Financial Officer
|                    |                                                        
|                    |                                                        
|Date: June 22, 2005 |                                                        
|                    | /s/ Kjeld Binger                                       
|                    | Name: Kjeld BingerTitle: Chief Executive Officer       



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Noxso Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
J. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard J. Anderson
---------------------------
Richard J. Anderson
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
July 14, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the AccuPoll Holding Corp. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis Vadura, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2)      The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
         presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ Dennis Vadura
------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Director
October 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Accupoll Holding Corp. and will be
retained by Accupoll Holding Corp.. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### Relationship of porosity and permeability to petrology of the Madison Limestone in rock cores from three test wells in Montana and Wyoming

By: P.A. Thayer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1273C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Table:  **Table 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Petrology and petrography for USGS test wells 1, 2, and 3 in the Madison Limestone in Montana and Wyoming(1981)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6033

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JEREMY MOUZON, a/k/a Ferris Earl Scott Green,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (2:03-cr-00896-PMD-1; 2:07-cv-70041-PMD)

Submitted: June 24, 2008 Decided: August 19, 2008

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeremy Mouzon, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jeremy Mouzon seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mouzon has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 15.9

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. on form S-8 (File No. 333-111310) of our
report dated February 25, 2004 with respect to the statements of operation,
changes in shareholders equity (capital deficiency) and cash flows of Pulsicom
Israel Technologies Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2003, which is
included in the Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. annual report on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Kesselman
& Kesselman
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2005
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 10, 2006
    By:
    /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBSAndrew F. JacobsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 10, 2006
    By:
    /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCHPhillip A. ReinschSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Rinat Remler, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                   
|-------------------
|Date: June 27, 2007
|                   
|                   
|                   



---
(May 20, 1964)

#### In the Matter of Walter Diamond, Appellant, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Order, entered May 19,1964, dismissing the petition to invalidate the designating petition of the respondent candidate, Isaac Ben Greenman, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts and, in the exercise of discretion, without costs. The motion to dismiss the petition is denied. Petitioner-appellant will be permitted to amend his petition, *wane pro tunc,*to include the page of the petition inadvertently omitted, and the petition will be deemed so amended, and the matter is remanded for immediate trial on the allegations of the petition as so amended. It is obvious that the omission from the petition of the page reciting that petitioner was the objector before the Board of Elections and that he is a duly enrolled voter in the party and district involved was a clerical inadvertence and irregularity. It was error to regard the absence of the page containing the allegations as jurisdictional and appropriate amendment should have been allowed. The petition was verified and was timely served. Furthermore, there is no question but that petitioner was a proper objector before the Board of Elections. Where there is timely service of a verified petition by a proper objector, there is jurisdiction to entertain a proceeding under subdivision 1 of section 330 and section 335 of the Election Law. Absent any defect in those three essentials, other omissions and irregularities should be curable by amendment, where as here, no prejudice resulted to the opposing party. It unnecessarily exalts form over substance to refuse amendment in the circumstances of this ease. The hearing on the objections should proceed forthwith. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
#### § 2700.44 Administrative sanctions.

Officers and employees of the United States Government assigned to OMSN shall be subject to appropriate administrative sanctions if they knowingly and willingly commit a violation under section 5-5 of E.O. 12065. These sanctions may include reprimand, suspension without pay, removal, termination of classification authority, or other sanction in accordance with applicable law or the applicable regulations of the agency from which they are assigned to OMSN.
### subpart i—marketing quotas—tobacco
§ 536.84 Scope for claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act. ( a ) *General.* This subpart applies in the United States, its commonwealths, territories and possessions (all hereinafter collectively referred to as United States or U.S.). It prescribes the substantive bases and special procedural requirements under the FTCA and the implementing Attorney General's regulations for the administrative settlement of claims against the United States based on death, personal injury, or damage to, or loss of, property caused by negligent or wrongful acts or omissions by the United States or its employees acting within the scope of their employment. If a conflict exists between this part and the Attorney General's regulations, the latter governs.
( b ) *Effect of the Military Claims Act.* A tort claim arising in the United States, its commonwealths, territories, and possessions may be settled under subpart C of this part if the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) does not apply to the type of claim under consideration or if the claim arose incident to noncombat activities. If a claim is filed under both the FTCA and the Military Claims Act (MCA), or when both statutes apply equally, final action thereon will follow the procedures set forth in DA Pam 27-162, paragraphs 2-74 through 2-76, discussing final offers and denial letters.