86908 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2020 / Notices 

1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the 

People’s Republic of China, 75 FR 37382 (June 29, 

2010) (Order). 

2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85 

FR 54348 (September 1, 2020). 

3 See Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘Prestressed 

Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the People’s 

Republic of China—Domestic Industry’s Notice of 

Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 14, 2020. 

4 See Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘Prestressed 

Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the People’s 

Republic of China—Domestic Industry’s 

Substantive Response,’’ dated September 30, 2020. 

number(s) identified below and are covered 

by this certification. ‘‘Direct personal 

knowledge’’ refers to facts the certifying party 

is expected to have in its own records. For 

example, the importer should have direct 

personal knowledge of the importation of the 

product (e.g., the name of the exporter) in its 

records. 

(C) If the importer is acting on behalf of the 

first U.S. customer, complete this paragraph, 

if not put ‘‘NA’’ at the end of this paragraph: 

finished diamond sawblades covered by this 

certification were imported by {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} on behalf of 

{NAME OF U.S. CUSTOMER}, located at 

{ADDRESS OF U.S. CUSTOMER}. 

(D) Finished diamond sawblades covered 

by this certification were shipped to {NAME 

OF PARTY TO WHOM MERCHANDISE 

WAS FIRST SHIPPED IN THE UNITED 

STATES}, located at {ADDRESS OF 

SHIPMENT}. 

(E) I have personal knowledge of the facts 

regarding the production of the finished 

diamond sawblades identified below. 

‘‘Personal knowledge’’ includes facts 

obtained from another party, (e.g., 

correspondence received by the importer (or 

exporter) from the producer regarding the 

country of manufacture of the imported 

products). 

(F) Finished diamond sawblades covered 

by this certification were not manufactured 

using cores produced in China. 

(G) This certification applies to the 

following entries (repeat this block as many 

times as necessary): 

Entry Summary #: 

Entry Summary Line Item #: 

Foreign Seller: 

Foreign Seller’s Address: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice #: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice Line Item #: 

Producer: Protech Diamond Tools Inc. 

Producer’s Address: Unit 105, 1626 –115 

Avenue NE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T3K 

2E4 

(H) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of this certification and 

sufficient documentation supporting this 

certification (i.e., documents maintained in 

the normal course of business, or documents 

obtained by the certifying party, for example, 

mill certificates, production records, 

invoices, etc.) for the later of (1) a period of 

five years from the date of entry, or (2) a 

period of three years after the conclusion of 

any litigation in the United States courts 

regarding such entries. 

(I) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

provide this certification and supporting 

records to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) and/or the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce), upon request by the 

respective agency. 

(J) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of the exporter’s certification 

(attesting to the production and/or export of 

the imported merchandise identified above), 

and any supporting records provided by the 

exporter to the importer, for the later of (1) 

a period of five years from the date of entry 

or (2) a period of three years after the 

conclusion of any litigation in United States 

courts regarding such entries. 

(K) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required, upon 

request, to provide a copy of the exporter’s 

certification and any supporting records 

provided by the exporter to the importer, to 

CBP and/or Commerce. 

(L) I understand that the claims made 

herein, and the substantiating 

documentation, are subject to verification by 

CBP and/or Commerce. 

(M) I understand that failure to maintain 

the required certifications, and/or failure to 

substantiate the claims made herein, and/or 

failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to 

verify the claims made herein, may result in 

a de facto determination that all entries to 

which this certification applies are within 

the scope of the antidumping duty order on 

diamond sawblades and parts thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China. I understand 

that such finding will result in: 

(i) suspension of liquidation of all 

unliquidated entries (and entries for which 

liquidation has not become final) for which 

these requirements were not met; 

(ii) the requirement that the importer post 

applicable antidumping duty cash deposits 

(as appropriate) equal to the rates determined 

by Commerce; and 

(iii) the revocation of {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY}’s privilege to 

certify future imports of diamond sawblades 

from Canada as not manufactured using cores 

from China. 

(N) I understand that agents of the 

importer, such as brokers, are not permitted 

to make this certification. Where a broker or 

other party was used to facilitate the entry 

process, {NAME OF IMPORTING 

COMPANY} obtained the entry summary 

number and date of entry summary from that 

party. 

(O) This certification was completed at or 

prior to the date of entry summary. 

(P) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but 

not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes 

criminal sanctions on individuals who 

knowingly and willfully make material false 

statements to the U.S. government. 

Signature 

NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL 

TITLE 

DATE 

[FR Doc. 2020–28980 Filed 12–30–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–945] 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire 

Strand From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of the Expedited 

Second Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on prestressed 

concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Sunset Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

DATES: Applicable December 31, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0176. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 29, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) published the 

antidumping duty order on PC strand 

from China.1 On September 1, 2020, 

Commerce initiated the second sunset 

review of the Order pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act).2 On September 14, 

2020, Commerce received a notice of 

intent to participate in this sunset 

review from Insteel Wire Products 

Company, Sumiden Wire Products 

Corporation, and Wire Mesh 

Corporation (collectively, ‘‘Domestic 

Industry’’), within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3

The members of the Domestic Industry 

claimed interested party status under 

section 771(9)(C) of the Act as producers 

of the domestic like product in the 

United States. On September 30, 2020, 

Commerce received a substantive 

response from the Domestic Industry 

within the 30-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 Commerce 

received no substantive responses from 

respondent interested parties, nor was a 

hearing requested. On October 27, 2020, 

Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that it did not receive an adequate 

substantive response from respondent 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2020 / Notices 86909 

5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on September 1, 2020,’’ dated October 27, 

2020. 

6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

interested parties.5 As a result, pursuant 

to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order is 

PC strand, produced from wire of nonstainless, non-galvanized steel, which is 

suitable for use in prestressed concrete 

(both pretensioned and post-tensioned) 

applications. The product definition 

encompasses covered and uncovered 

strand and all types, grades, and 

diameters of PC strand. PC strand is 

normally sold in the United States in 

sizes ranging from 0.25 inches to 0.70 

inches in diameter. PC strand made 

from galvanized wire is only excluded 

from the scope if the zinc and/or zinc 

oxide coating meets or exceeds the 0.40 

oz./ft2 standard set forth in ASTM–A– 

475. Imports of the subject merchandise 

are currently classifiable under 

subheadings 7312.10.3010 and 

7312.10.3012 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of this order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Commerce Received 

All issues raised in this review, 

including the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping in the event 

of revocation and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the order 

were revoked, are addressed in the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of topics discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

The signed and the electronic version of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on PC strand 

from China would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the following weighted-average 

margins and that the margins of 

dumping likely to prevail would be 

weighted-average margins of up to 

193.55 percent.6

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to interested parties subject to 

an APO of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305. Timely notification of the 

return or destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and terms 

of an APO is a violation which is subject 

to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. 

Dated: December 28, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to 

Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2020–28979 Filed 12–30–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Patent and Trademark Office 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; Substantive Submissions 

Made During Prosecution of the 

Trademark Application 

The United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit 

the following information collection 

request to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for review and clearance 

in accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, on or after the 

date of publication of this notice. The 

USPTO invites comment on this 

information collection renewal, which 

helps the USPTO assess the impact of 

its information collection requirements 

and minimize the public’s reporting 

burden. Public comments were 

previously requested via the Federal 

Register on October 23, 2020 during a 

60-day comment period. This notice 

allows for an additional 30 days for 

public comments. 

Agency: United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, Department of 

Commerce. 

Title: Substantive Submissions Made 

During Prosecution of the Trademark 

Application 

OMB Control Number: 0651–0054. 

Forms: (PTO = Patent and Trademark 

Office) 

• PTO 1553 (Allegation of Use 

(Statement of Use/Amendment to 

Allege Use)) 

• PTO 1581 (Request for Extension of 

Time to File a Statement of Use) 

• PTO 2194 (Petition to Revive 

Abandoned Application—Failure to 

Respond Timely to Office Action) 

• PTO 2195 (Petition to Revive 

Abandoned Application—Failure to 

File Timely Statement of Use or 

Extension Request) 

• PTO 2200 (Request to Delete Section 

1(b) Basis, Intent to Use) 

• PTO 2202 (Request for Express 

Abandonment (Withdrawal) of 

Application) 

• PTO 2301 (Petition to Director) 

Type of Review: Extension and 

revision of a currently approved 

information collection. 

Number of Respondents: 337,382 

respondents per year. 

Average Hour per Response: The 

USPTO estimates that it will take the 

public from approximately 25 minutes 

(0.4 hours) to 65 minutes (1.1 hours) to 

complete a response, depending on the 

complexity of the situation. This 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES