alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                 13,120
<SECURITIES>                           15,880
<RECEIVABLES>                          32,999
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            12,009
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       79,166
<PP&E>                                 35,713
<DEPRECIATION>                         26,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        119,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  38,918
<BONDS>                                35,576
<COMMON>                               8,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            58
<OTHER-SE>                             30,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          119,182
<SALES>                                70,495
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       70,495
<CGS>                                  52,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          64,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        5,975
<INCOME-TAX>                           1,790
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    4,185
<DISCONTINUED>                        (3,066)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,119
<EPS-BASIC>                          .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .06


</TABLE>
#### JOHN T. TIERNEY, W.R. ARMSTRONG, JR., DIANNE JUBY, W.W. BECK, JR., JAMES C. HEDGECOCK, JACQUE HEDGECOCK, ROBERT DOWNING, STEVEN COHEN, TIMOTHY J. DENAULT, SUSAN P.A. DENAULT, DENNIS HALL, CAROL HALL, CAREY BERG, CONNALLY BRANCH, AND SUBSCRIBERS OF FIRST CONSUMERS STATE BANK, SOUTHERN PINES (PROPOSED) v. ROBERT M. GARRARD

No. 496PA96

(Filed 3 October 1997)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 124 N.C. App. 415, 477 S.E.2d 73 (1996), affirming orders entered on 5 June 1995 and 24 July 1995 by Webb, J., in Superior Court, Moore County. Heard in the Supreme Court 8 September 1997.

*Britt & Britt, by William S. Britt, for plaintiff-appellants.*

*Bugg & Wolf, P.A., by John E. Bugg and William J. Wolf, for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William B. Carroll, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated July 5, 1961, which denied, without a hearing, his application to vacate the sentence of said court on August 16,1960 upon his conviction, on a plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree; such sentence having been imposed upon him as a third felony offender. Order affirmed. Defendant contends that one of his prior convictions, namely, his conviction in New Jersey in 1939 for receiving stolen property, would not have been a felony in this State; hence, he was improperly sentenced on August 16, 1960 as a third felony offender. We find this contention to be untenable. Section 1308 of the Penal Law of this State, as it read on the date of defendant’s New Jersey conviction in 1939, did not distinguish between a felony and a misdemeanor as it presently does (L. 1943, ch. 180). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Glen Canyon
National Recreation AreaAZ, UT
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

**Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Leonard F. Leganza, the Chief Executive Officer of The Eastern Company (the “Company”) and John L. Sullivan III, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

| 1) | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period ended June 28, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 29th day of July, 2008.

 

|   | /s/ Leonard F. Leganza    |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Leonard F. Leganza

CEO   |
|   |                      |
|   | /s/ John L. Sullivan III  |
|   | John L. Sullivan III

CFO |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Eastern Company and will be retained by The Eastern Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                                            STATE OF
COMPANY NAME                                                INCORPORATION
------------                                                -------------

FSC Corporation                                             Georgia
FSC Advisory Corporation                                    Georgia
FSC Realty Advisors Corporation                             Georgia
FSC Resources Corporation                                   Georgia
Financial Service Corporation of America                    Georgia
FSC Realty, Inc.                                            Georgia
FSC Securities Corporation                                  Georgia
FSC Agency, Inc.                                            Georgia
Forthright Agency of Nevada, Inc.                           Georgia
Forthright Agency of Ohio, Inc.                             Ohio
Forthright Agency of Oklahoma, Inc.                         Georgia
Forthright Insurance Agency of Massachusetts, Inc.          Georgia
Forthright Agency of Alabama, Inc.                          Alabama
FSC Agency of Hawaii, Inc.                                  Hawaii
FSC Agency of Louisiana, Inc.                               Louisiana
Forthright Agency of Arizona, Inc.                          Arizona
FSC Agency of Arkansas, Inc.                                Arkansas
Forthright Service Corporation                              Indiana
FSC Insurance Agency of Indiana, Inc.                       Indiana
Forthright Agency of Pennsylvania, Inc.                     Pennsylvania
Forthright Agency of North Dakota, Inc.                     North Dakota
Forthright Agency of Montana, Inc.                          Montana
FSC Agency of Puerto Rico, Inc.                             Puerto Rico
UAS to be used by the petitioner

FCC compliance label
**Exhibit 12.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Trevor StewartMunday, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Sasol Limited;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.     Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

5.     Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:26 October 2005
|        | By:    | /s/ TREVOR  STEWART MUNDAY                     |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Trevor Stewart Munday                               |
|   |   | Deputy chief executive and chief  financial officer |
|        |        |                                                     |  |

 

----
*

Honorable Harlington Wood, Jr., Senior U.S. Circuit Judge

for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. 

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 95-3020.

Arthur MODDER and Gail Modder, Plaintiffs-Counter DefendantsAppellants,

v.

AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS, DefendantCounter Claimant-Appellee.

May 29, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida. (No. 92-1243-CIV-T-24C), Elizabeth A. Jenkins,

Judge.

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WOOD*

,

Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In a prior opinion, Modder v. American Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 86

F.3d 1070 (11th Cir.1996), we determined that this case involved a

dispositive but unsettled question of Florida law. Accordingly, we

certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida:

Does the exclusionary provision of Section 627.6515(2),

Florida Statutes, exempt an insurer from liability under

Section 627.6698, Florida Statutes, and if so, has the insurer

in this case provided the factual predicate necessary to come

within the exclusionary provision?

Modder, 86 F.3d at 1071-72.

The Supreme Court of Florida has now answered the certified

question in the affirmative stating:

[W]e answer the first part of the Eleventh Circuit's certified

question in the affirmative and hold that the clear language

of section 627.6515(2) establishes that the attorney's fee

penalty of section 627.6698, like the rest of part VII, is not

applicable to policies described in section 627.6515(2).
....

In light of the district court's factual findings that

(1) the NBA [National Business Association] was formed

primarily for purposes other than providing insurance, and (2)

that ANTEX [American National Life Insurance Company of Texas]

also has complied with section 627.6515(2)(b) and (c), we

answer the second part of the Eleventh Circuit's question in

the affirmative.

Modder v. American Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 688 So.2d 330, 333-34

(Fla.1997).

Based on this answer, we conclude, as did the Supreme Court of

Florida, that the ANTEX group policy providing health insurance

coverage to the Modders comes within the exclusionary provision of

Section 627.6515(2), Florida Statutes. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court's order denying the Modders' motion for attorney's

fees.

AFFIRMED.
§ 107.5 Procedures. ( a ) Each contract under 10 U.S.C. 1091 with an individual or with an entity, such as a professional corporation or partnership, for the personal services of an individual must contain language specifically acknowledging the individual as a personal services contractor whose performance is subject to supervision and direction by designated officials of the Department of Defense.
( b ) The appearance of an employer-employee relationship created by the DoD supervision of a personal services contractor will normally support a limited recognition of the contractor as equal in status to a DoD employee in disposing of personal injury claims arising out of the contractor's performance. Personal injury claims alleging negligence by the contractor within the scope of his or her contract performance, therefore, will be processed as claims alleging negligence by DoD military or civil service personnel.
( c ) Compensation for personal services contractors under 10 U.S.C. 1091 shall be within the limits established in the Table of Authorized Compensation Rates (see enclosure 1). Prorated compensation based upon hourly, daily, or weekly rates may be awarded when a contractor's services are not required on a full-time basis. In all cases, however, a contractor may be compensated only for periods of time actually devoted to the delivery of services required by the contract.
( d ) Contracts for personal services entered into shall be awarded and administered pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), part 37 and DoD and departmental supplementary contracting provisions.
### §966. Tier 3 participants in C–TPAT

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall establish a third tier of C–TPAT participation that offers additional benefits to participants who demonstrate a sustained commitment to maintaining security measures and supply chain security practices that exceed the guidelines established for validation as a Tier 2 participant in C–TPAT under section 965 of this title.

#### (b) Criteria

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall designate criteria for validating a C–TPAT participant as a Tier 3 participant under this section. Such criteria may include—

(1) compliance with any additional guidelines established by the Secretary that exceed the guidelines established pursuant to section 965 of this title for validating a C–TPAT participant as a Tier 2 participant, particularly with respect to controls over access to cargo throughout the supply chain;

(2) submission of additional information regarding cargo prior to loading, as determined by the Secretary;

(3) utilization of container security devices, technologies, policies, or practices that meet standards and criteria established by the Secretary; and

(4) compliance with any other cargo requirements established by the Secretary.

#### (c) Benefits

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, in consultation with the Commercial Operations Advisory Committee and the National Maritime Security Advisory Committee, shall extend benefits to each C–TPAT participant that has been validated as a Tier 3 participant under this section, which may include—

(1) the expedited release of a Tier 3 participant's cargo in destination ports within the United States during all threat levels designated by the Secretary;

(2) further reduction in examinations of cargo;

(3) priority for examinations of cargo; and

(4) further reduction in the risk score assigned pursuant to the Automated Targeting System; and

(5) inclusion in joint incident management exercises, as appropriate.

#### (d) Deadline

Not later than 2 years after October 13, 2006, the Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall designate appropriate criteria pursuant to subsection (b) and provide benefits to validated Tier 3 participants pursuant to subsection (c).

(Pub. L. 109–347, title II, §216, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1910.)
### **CHAPTER 78—AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY RESEARCH**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                              96
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3588
<ALLOWANCES>                                       507
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1743
<PP&E>                                            6814
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1067
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          2515
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2399)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6399
<SALES>                                           2384
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4422
<CGS>                                             1153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   451
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    300
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                298
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       298
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
### §13143. Outside earned income limitation

(a) Outside Earned Income Limitation.—

(1) In general.—Except as provided by paragraph (2), a Member or an officer or employee who is a noncareer officer or employee and who occupies a position classified above GS–15 of the General Schedule or, in the case of positions not under the General Schedule, for which the rate of basic pay is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the minimum rate of basic pay payable for GS–15 of the General Schedule, may not in any calendar year have outside earned income attributable to such calendar year which exceeds 15 percent of the annual rate of basic pay for level II of the Executive Schedule under section 5313 of this title, as of January 1 of such calendar year.

(2) Portion of year.—In the case of any individual who during a calendar year becomes a Member or an officer or employee who is a noncareer officer or employee and who occupies a position classified above GS–15 of the General Schedule or, in the case of positions not under the General Schedule, for which the rate of basic pay is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the minimum rate of basic pay payable for GS–15 of the General Schedule, such individual may not have outside earned income attributable to the portion of that calendar year which occurs after such individual becomes a Member or such an officer or employee which exceeds 15 percent of the annual rate of basic pay for level II of the Executive Schedule under section 5313 of this title, as of January 1 of such calendar year multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of days such individual is a Member or such officer or employee during such calendar year and the denominator of which is 365.

(b) Honoraria Prohibition.—An individual may not receive any honorarium while that individual is a Member, officer or employee.

(c) Treatment of Charitable Contributions.—Any honorarium which, except for subsection (b), might be paid to a Member, officer or employee, but which is paid instead on behalf of such Member, officer or employee to a charitable organization, shall be deemed not to be received by such Member, officer or employee. No such payment shall exceed $2,000 or be made to a charitable organization from which such individual or a parent, sibling, spouse, child, or dependent relative of such individual derives any financial benefit.

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(c), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4303.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 13143 | 5 U.S.C. App. (EGA §501) | Pub. L. 95–521, title V, §501, as added Pub. L. 101–194, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1760; amended Pub. L. 101–280, §7(a), May 4, 1990, 104 Stat. 161; Pub. L. 102–378, §4(b)(1), (2), Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1357. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

GS–15, referred to in subsec. (a), is contained in the General Schedule, which is set out under section 5332 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Hartsdale Station Shopping Center, Inc., Appellant, v. Julian Liberman et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Greenburgh, Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, denying petitioner’s application for a variance in the town’s zoning ordinance, and to direct said board to grant the variance, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 5, 1960, which dismisses its petition. Petitioner seeks the variance for the purpose of erecting a six-story multifamily dwelling, 65 feet high, in a district permitting multifamily dwellings of not more than three stories with a maximum height of 35 feet. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and matter remitted to the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals for the making of a determination consistent herewith. In our opinion, the petitioner established practical difficulties and unnecessary hardship. Hence, the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals denying the variance as to the height of the proposed building was arbitrary and capricious. (Cf. *Matter of Vergara*v. *Campbell,*8 A D 2d 823, motion for leave to appeal denied 7 N" Y 2d 706; *Matter of McManus*v. *Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of New Rochelle,*3 A D 2d 932.) Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur; Ughetta, Acting P. J., dissents and votes to affirm the order upon the opinion of the Special Term. Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes and affirm. (25 Mise 2d 684.)