alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Lawrence Patrick Adrian Davies, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Sasol Limited;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.     Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)   Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:26 October 2005
|        | By:    | /s/ LAWRENCE  PATRICK ADRIAN DAVIES |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Lawrence Patrick Adrian Davies           |
|   |   | Chief executive                          |
|        |        |                                          |  |

 

----
# C_2013071EN.01001901.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/19

---

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2013 — La Vigile San Marco v Commission

(Case T-262/00) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and requiring the recovery of aid paid - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 71/29

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: La Vigile San Marco SpA (Venice, Italy) (represented by: A. Vianello, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Italian Republic (initially represented by: U. Leanza, then by I. Braguglia, then by R. Adam, and finally by I. Bruni, Agents, assisted by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance;

| 2. | The action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law;

| 3. | La Vigile San Marco SpA shall bear the Commission’s costs in addition to its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

La Vigile San Marco SpA shall bear the Commission’s costs in addition to its own costs;

| 4. | The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 9.12.2000.

1

---
#### § 252.1 Purpose.

This part updates policy and outlines fiscal and logistical support that the DoD may provide to qualified scouting organizations operating on U.S. military installations overseas.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,230
<PP&E>                                         102,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          354,615
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       255,222
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,660
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               780,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,898,376)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,898,376)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,898,376)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 1807.141-1807.148 [Reserved]
| Exhibit                32.1 |
|-----------------------------|

| (a)   | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 28, 2007,                which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements                of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                as                amended; and                                                          |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b)   | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the                quarter                ended October 29, 2006, which accompanies this certification, fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results                of                operation of Duckwall-ALCO Stores,                Inc. |

*/s./*
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the Company and itssubsidiaries. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Kenneth A. Joyce                       |   | /s/ Duane L. Sinn                                             |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Kenneth      A. Joyce,                     |   | Duane      L. Sinn                                            |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive      Vice President and ChiefFinancial      Officer |
|                                       |   |                                                          |
| Dated:  March      17, 2010      |   | Dated:  March      17, 2010                         |

| * | This      certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and      shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act      or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.  This      certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any      filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,      except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference      in such filing. |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
(December 8, 1978)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lawrence Brown, Jr., Petitioner.

Petition, dated August 19, 1978, for writ of habeas corpus or for release on bail pending appeal, denied. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul M. Anderson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|/S/    PAUL M. ANDERSON                                                         
|Paul M. AndersonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer August 9, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leslie Renous, Appellant.

— Motion to dismiss appeal denied.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wages in the Nonferrous-Metals Industry, June 1943

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wages in the Nonferrous-Metals Industry, June 1943 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 765*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4249,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
(July 5, 1963)

R epublished.

#### In the Matter of James O. Evans, Appellant, v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., Respondent-Respondent.

Orders entered on September 18, 1961 and October 6, 1961 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. On any view the award was proper. It is not necessary therefore to reach the question of petitioner’s standing in the arbitration. Appeal from decision entered October 6,1961 unanimously dismissed, without costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ. [19 A D 2d 702.]
**Exhibit 21**

Subsidiaries of the Registrant 

S-K Item 601 (21) – Subsidiaries of the Registrant 

Artist to Market Distribution LLC, a Michigan LLC 

Handleman – CE, Inc., a California Corporation 

Handleman – CEG, Inc., a California Corporation 

Handleman Canada, Inc., a Canadian Corporation 

Handleman Category Management Company, a Michigan Corporation 

Handleman Company of Canada, Limited, an Ontario Corporation

Handleman do Brasil Commercial Ltda. 

Handleman Real Estate, LLC, a Michigan LLC 

Handleman Services Company, a Michigan Corporation 

Handleman – SVGD, Inc., a California Corporation 

Handleman UK Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation 

Hanley Advertising Company, a Michigan Corporation 

REPS, L.L.C., a Michigan LLC 

The itsy bitsyEntertainment Company, a Delaware Corporation
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Visitorguide, Carlsbad Caverns & Guadalupe Mountains National Parks**
 
2006:Fall | Summer
2007:Fall | Summer
2010:Spring/Summer
2012:Guide
2013:Spring/Summer
2015:Summer/Fall | Winter/Spring
2016:Summer/Fall | Winter/Spring
2017:Fall/Winter | Winter/Spring
2018:Spring/Summer
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.21/2:C 19/
Item Number:0650-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000988796
 
May 15, 2018
#### The People of the State of New York v. Samuel Duncan.

Motion to dispense with printing granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon the original record, without printing the same, except that a certified copy of the indictment shall be substituted in place of the original indictment, but upon printed appellant’s points; the original record and appellant’s printed points to be filed on or before March 28, 1961 with notice of argument for the May 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### § 942.783 Underground mining permit applications—Minimum requirements for information on environmental resources.

Part 783 of this chapter, *Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Information on Environmental Resources,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct underground coal mining operations.
### Assessing	the	Effect	of	Five	Gasoline	Properties	on	Exhaust	Emissions	from	Light **** **Duty	Vehicles	certified	to	Tier -**  **2	Standards Analysis**  **of	Data	from	EPA	Phase	3 (EPAct/V2/E**  **- 89)**  

## Appendix **O .3** 

**Model	Fitting	Information	for** 

## Benzene **( Bag	1**  **)**
This appendix summarizes model fitting for Bag- 1 Benzene . Model
- fitting techniques and approaches summarized in Section 8 .7 . Features of the data and modeling for this compound are listed below. Fuel
-parameter matrix: REDUCED Media contamination: NO No. measurements: 176 No. censored values: 0 Modeling approach: MIXED MODEL Estimated Dependent Variable model: NO

### Models fit for Bag**- 1**  **Benzene** Model Term Notation Model Main Effects (Full) MM2 MM3 etOH Z

e ● × Arom Z

a ● ● ● RVP Z

r T50 Z

5 ● ● × T90 Z

9 ● × 

### Fitting history for Bag**- 1**  **Benzene**
**– with “**  **MM3 ” selected as best fit model.**  

### Fit Parameters Test with respect to Full Test with respect to Previous Model 

### Model p -2 ln

L BIC 1 

### Dev. 1 

### d Pr>χ 2 

### Dev. d Pr>χ 2 Main Effects 5 248.12 267.08 MM2 3 248.27 261.81 0.144 2 0.93 MM3 2 250.02 260.85 1.89 3 0.59 1.75 1 0.19 1 A lower value indicates a better fit. 1 The deviation is the difference in the
- 2loglik statistics for the nested and reference models, respectively, per 

### Error! **Reference source not found.** 

. 

### Coefficients and Type**- III Tests of Effect for the**  **Full and Best** **- Fit Models** 
**– Benzene**  **(Bag 1).** Effect Full Model Best
-Fit Model ( M M3 ) Estimate Std.Err. d.f. t- value Pr> t Estimate Std.Err. d.f. t- value Pr> t Intercept
- 4.1019 0.1392 15.07
- 29.48 <0.0001
- 4.1074 0.1391 15.05
- 29.52 <0.0001 Z e - 0.004685 0.03704 161.12
- 0.126 0.90 Z a 0.4056 0.03389 161.17 11.97 <0.0001 0.4032 0.03284 161.20 12.28 <0.0001 Z 5 0.04142 0.03789 161.15 1.09 0.28 Z 9 0.01133 0.03255 161.20 0.35 0.73 2 veh 

###  0.2741 0.2739 2  

###  0.1873 0.1896
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, Group
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Duke Energy Carolinas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Carolinas.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID L. HAUSER                     
|David L. Hauser                            
|Group Executive and Chief Financial Officer
|May 14, 2008
### §764. National exercise simulation center

The President shall establish a national exercise simulation center that—

(1) uses a mix of live, virtual, and constructive simulations to—

(A) prepare elected officials, emergency managers, emergency response providers, and emergency support providers at all levels of government to operate cohesively;

(B) provide a learning environment for the homeland security personnel of all Federal agencies;

(C) assist in the development of operational procedures and exercises, particularly those based on catastrophic incidents; and

(D) allow incident commanders to exercise decisionmaking in a simulated environment; and

(2) uses modeling and simulation for training, exercises, and command and control functions at the operational level.

(Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §664, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1433.)
#### In the Matter of Walter Higgins, an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement to the Bar granted. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally. Stevens and Eager, JJ.
### §9504. Recruitment, retention, relocation incentives, and relocation expenses

(a) Before September 30, 2013 and subject to approval by the Office of Personnel Management, the Secretary of the Treasury may provide for variations from sections 5753 and 5754 governing payment of recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives.

(b) Before September 30, 2013, the Secretary of the Treasury may pay from appropriations made to the Internal Revenue Service allowable relocation expenses under section 5724a for employees transferred or reemployed and allowable travel and transportation expenses under section 5723 for new appointees, for any new appointee appointed to a position for which pay is fixed under section 9502 or 9503 after June 1, 1998.

(Added Pub. L. 105–206, title I, §1201(a), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 713; amended Pub. L. 110–161, div. D, title I, §106, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1977; Pub. L. 113–6, div. F, title III, §1309, Mar. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 418.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2013—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 113–6 substituted "Before September 30, 2013" for "Before July 23, 2013".

2007—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 110–161 substituted "Before July 23, 2013" for "For a period of 10 years after the date of enactment of this section".
#### Max J. Le Boyer, Respondent, v. Benjamin Margolis et al., Appellants.

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.