alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 8, 2006

|MS Structured Asset Corp.                         
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

|Delaware                                        | 333-101155                | 13-4026700                        
|----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                                               
|(State or Other Jurisdiction  of Incorporation) | (Commission File  Number) | (IRS Employer  Identification No.)



|1585 Broadway, Second Floor  New York, New York  Attention: Madhu Philips | 10036     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------
|                                                                         
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                                  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

|Not Applicable                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





---





Section 8Other Events



| | Item 8.01 | Other Events
| | --------- | ------------



Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS), AT&T Corp. Debenture Backed Series 2003-14 Trust (the Trust) (New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol DKZ) has liquidated its assets and terminated. Settlement of a sale of the securities held by the Trust occurred on February 8, 2006, and a liquidation distribution was made with respect to the Units of the Trust on February 8, 2006.



In respect of the Class A Units, the amount of the distribution was $25.437 per Class A Unit, representing the full Unit Principal Balance of the Class A Units plus accrued interest in respect of the Class A Units through and excluding February 8, 2006.



In respect of the Class B Units, the amount of the distribution was $183.658 per $1,000 Initial Notional Amortizing Balance of Class B Units, representing the full Class B Present Value Amount as determined for value on February 8, 2006.

| |  | 
| |  | 





---











SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.



Date: February 14, 2006

MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.

(Registrant)

By: /s/ Madhu Philips

Name:    Madhu Philips
  Title:     Vice President





| |  | 
| |  | 





---
EX 10.6


    EXHIBIT
      10.6

     

    
      	
              Schedule
                Identifying Material Differences Between Employment Agreements Between
                Neoprobe Corporation and the Individuals Listed
                Below

            
	
            	
              Salary

            	
              Vacation

            	
              Severance

            	
              Change
                of Control

              Severance

            	
              Effective
                Date

            	
              Term

            
	
              Brent
                L. Larson

            	
              $160,000

            	
              25
                days

            	
              $149,000

            	
              $298,000

            	
              January
                1, 2005

            	
              24
                Months

            
	
              Douglas
                L. Rash

            	
              $108,000

            	
              15
                days

            	
              $54,000

            	
              $108,000

            	
              January
                1, 2006

            	
              12
                Months

            
	
              Anthony
                K. Blair

            	
              $122,000

            	
              15
                days

            	
              $61,000

            	
              $122,000

            	
              January
                1, 2006

            	
              12
                Months

            
	
              Rodger
                A. Brown

            	
              $129,000

            	
              20
                days

            	
              $124,000

            	
              $248,000

            	
              January
                1, 2005

            	
              24
                Months

            
	
              Carl
                M. Bosch

            	
              $160,000

            	
              20
                days

            	
              $149,000

            	
              $298,000

            	
              January
                1, 2005

            	
              24
                Months
§ 250.2 Applicability and scope. ( a ) This part applies to: ( 1 ) All unclassified technical data with military or space application in the possession of, or under the control of, a DoD Component which may not be exported lawfully without an approval, authorization, or license under E.O. 12470 or the Arms Export Control Act. However, the application of this part is limited only to such technical data that disclose critical technology with military or space application. The release of other technical data shall be accomplished in accordance with DoD Instruction 5200.21 and DoD 5400.7-R.
( 2 ) The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and activities support administratively by OSD, the Military Departments, the Organization of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Defense Agencies, and the Unified and Specified Commands (hereafter referred to collectively as “DoD Components”).
( b ) This part does not: ( 1 ) Modify or supplant the regulations promulgated under E.O. 12470 or the Arms Export Control Act governing the export of technical data, that is, 15 CFR part 379 of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and 22 CFR part 125 of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).
( 2 ) Introduce any additional controls on the dissemination of technical data by private enterprises or individuals beyond those specified by export control laws and regulations or in contracts or other mutual agreements, including certifications made pursuant to § 250.3(a). Accordingly, the mere fact that the Department of Defense may possess such data does not in itself provide a basis for control of such data pursuant to this part.
( 3 ) Introduce any controls on the dissemination of scientific, educational, or other data that qualify for General License GTDA under 15 CFR 379.3 of the EAR (see § 250.7) or for general exemptions under 22 CFR 125.11 of the ITAR (see § 250.8).
( 4 ) Alter the responsibilities of DoD Components to protect proprietary data of a private party in which the Department of Defense has “limited rights” or “restricted rights” (as defined in 32 CFR 9-201(c) and 9-601(j) of the DoD Acquisition Regulation, or which are authorized to be withheld from public disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4).
( 5 ) Pertain to, or affect, the release of technical data by DoD Components to foreign governments, international organizations, or their respective representatives or contractors, pursuant to official agreements or formal arrangements with the U.S. Government, or pursuant to U.S. Government-licensed transactions involving such entities or individuals. In the absence of such U.S. Government-sanctioned relationships, however, this part does apply.
( 6 ) Apply to classified technical data. After declassification, however, dissemination of such data that are within the scope of § 250.2(a)(1) is governed by this part.
#### In the Matter of Borgia Butler Houses. City of New York, Appellant-Respondent; David Kushner et al., Respondents; 1349 Brook Ave., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Motion for an enlargement of time granted and the time of all of the parties who have taken appeals from the final decree of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on November 9, 1959, to file the record on appeal and their appellants’ points is extended to and including December 31, 1960, with notice of argument for the February 1961 Term of this court, said appeals to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          42,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                     48,313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,924
<PP&E>                                          63,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,348
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,721
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,590
<SALES>                                        104,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,320
<CGS>                                           42,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,982
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,982
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
        

</TABLE>
### §7134. Regulations

The Authority, the General Counsel, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Labor Management Relations, and the Panel shall each prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this chapter applicable to each of them, respectively. Provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5 of this title shall be applicable to the issuance, revision, or repeal of any such rule or regulation.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title VII, §701, Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1215.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1101 of this title.
#### Mary Erdei, plaintiff in error, v. Garden City Sand Company, defendant in error.

Gen. No. 29,533.

Action for personal injuries sustained in being run over by motor truck. Judgment for defendant. Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Emanuel Eller, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 3, 1925.

Charles C. Spencer, for plaintiff in error.

Alfred Roy Hulbert, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court,
### §4507a. Awarding of ranks to other senior career employees

(a) For the purpose of this section, the term "senior career employee" means an individual appointed to a position classified above GS–15 and paid under section 5376 who is not serving—

(1) under a time-limited appointment; or

(2) in a position that is excepted from the competitive service because of its confidential or policy-making character.

(b) Each agency employing senior career employees shall submit annually to the Office of Personnel Management recommendations of senior career employees in the agency to be awarded the rank of Meritorious Senior Professional or Distinguished Senior Professional, which may be awarded by the President for sustained accomplishment or sustained extraordinary accomplishment, respectively.

(c) The recommendations shall be made, reviewed, and awarded under the same terms and conditions (to the extent determined by the Office of Personnel Management) that apply to rank awards for members of the Senior Executive Service under section 4507.

(Added Pub. L. 107–67, title VI, §641(a), Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 554.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

GS–15, referred to in subsec. (a), is contained in the General Schedule, which is set out under section 5332 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective for awards granted in 2003, see section 641(d) of Pub. L. 107–67, set out as an Effective Date of 2001 Amendment note under section 4506 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998 
<CASH>                                               3,888 
<SECURITIES>                                        42,851 
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0 
<INVENTORY>                                              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    48,405 
<PP&E>                                              24,294 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (12,877)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      62,252 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               13,332 
<BONDS>                                              2,200 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                            400 
<COMMON>                                                25 
<OTHER-SE>                                          44,749 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        62,252 
<SALES>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     4,193 
<CGS>                                                    0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       28,194 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (3,054)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     435 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (21,382)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (21,382)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       (21,382)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.03)
                                               


</TABLE>
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1386 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on Project 2025. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2024 

Ms. UNDERWOOD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on 

Project 2025. 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, would strip away Americans’ most fundamental rights and freedoms; 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, would devastate working 

families across America, raising costs, lowering wages, 

destroying our environment, and dismantling access to 

health care; 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, would slash vital lifelines 

like Social Security and Medicare and make hardworking 

American taxpayers work longer for less; 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, would remove protections 

for people with pre-existing health conditions, raise prescription drug prices, ban Medicare from negotiating 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1386 IH 

lower drug costs, and put a new tax on health insurance 

for people who get coverage at work; 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, would criminalize abortion 

nationwide, restrict access to birth control, and even ban 

fertility services like IVF; 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, would allow government 

agents to monitor pregnancies to potentially prosecute 

parents if they miscarry; 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, would cut school meals for 

kids, end Head Start for preschoolers, slash public school 

funding, and fire teachers across the country; 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, would raise costs and slash 

investments for working families to give huge new tax 

breaks to billionaires, CEOs, and the biggest corporations; 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, threatens America’s national security and our ability to compete across the 

globe; 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, would destroy fundamental 

checks and balances on Presidential powers; and 

Whereas Project 2025, if enacted, would terminate the 

United States Constitution: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 demns in the strongest terms Project 2025. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Fred Edey, Deceased. Julia E. Paige et al., Respondents; Old Colony Trust Company, as Trustee under the Will of Fred Edey, Deceased, Appellant.

In a proceeding by a trust beneficiary under section 145 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, to construe the will of the testator, Fred Edey, with respect to the proper rate for the computation of the commissions payable to the testamentary trustee, such trustee, Old Colony Trust Company, as successor trustee of the four trusts created by the testator’s will, appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County, dated May 10, 1960, as determines that the commissions to which it is entitled are to be determined by and in accordance with the rates prescribed under the laws of the State of New York, as in effect from time to time. Decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable proportionately from each of the four trusts and charged to principal. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 27432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11557]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9132]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Three Paintings by Johan Christian Dahl'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following Determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Three Paintings by Johan Christian Dahl,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The 
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about June 
1, 2015, until on or about June 30, 2016, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy and 
Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of 
State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: section2459@state.gov). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 6, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-11557 Filed 5-12-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
### §104909. Wildlife management in parks

(a) Use of Qualified Volunteers.—If the Secretary determines it is necessary to reduce the size of a wildlife population on System land in accordance with applicable law (including regulations), the Secretary may use qualified volunteers to assist in carrying out wildlife management on System land.

(b) Requirements for Qualified Volunteers.—Qualified volunteers providing assistance under subsection (a) shall be subject to—

(1) any training requirements or qualifications established by the Secretary; and

(2) any other terms and conditions that the Secretary may require.

(c) Donations.—The Secretary may authorize the donation and distribution of meat from wildlife management activities carried out under this section, including the donation and distribution to Indian Tribes, qualified volunteers, food banks, and other organizations that work to address hunger, in accordance with applicable health guidelines and such terms and conditions as the Secretary may require.

(Added Pub. L. 116–9, title II, §2410(a), Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 752.)
§ 22.705 Policy. ( a ) DoD policy is to have each recipient deal with a single office, to the maximum extent practicable, for post-award administration of its grants and cooperative agreements. This reduces burdens on recipients that can result when multiple DoD offices separately administer grants and cooperative agreements they award to a given recipient. It also minimizes unnecessary duplication of field administration services.
( b ) To further reduce burdens on recipients, the office responsible for performing field administration services for grants and cooperative agreements to a particular recipient shall be, to the maximum extent practicable, the same office that is assigned responsibility for performing field administration services for contracts awarded to that recipient.
( c ) Contracting activities and grants officers therefore shall use cross-servicing arrangements whenever practicable and, to the maximum extent possible, delegate responsibility for post-award administration to the cognizant grants administration offices identified in § 22.710.
#### § 275.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to authorize DoD Components to request financial records from a financial institution pursuant to the formal written request procedure authorized by section 1108 of the Act and to set forth the conditions under which such requests may be made.