alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7541. Definitions

For the purpose of this subchapter—

(1) "employee" means a career appointee in the Senior Executive Service who—

(A) has completed the probationary period prescribed under section 3393(d) of this title; or

(B) was covered by the provisions of subchapter II of this chapter immediately before appointment to the Senior Executive Service; and

(2) "suspension" has the meaning set forth in section 7501(2) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title IV, §411(2), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1174; amended Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title XI, §1105(c)(5), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1024; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XI, §1106(b)(2)(E), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1950.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Par. (1)(A). Pub. L. 117–81 struck out "or section 1599e of title 10" after "section 3393(d) of this title".

2015—Par. (1)(A). Pub. L. 114–92 inserted "or section 1599e of title 10" after "this title".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–81 applied as if effective Dec. 31, 2022, to correspond to the effective date of the repeal of section 1599e of Title 10, Armed Forces, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. See Effective Date of Repeal note under section 1599e of Title 10.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 9 months after Oct. 13, 1978, and congressional review of provisions of sections 401 through 412 of Pub. L. 95–454, see section 415 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 3131 of this title.
§ 1911.1 Authority and purpose. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued under the authority of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, as amended, Executive Order 13526 (or successor Orders), and section 1.6 of Executive Order 12333, as amended (or successor Orders).
( b ) *Purpose.* This part prescribes procedures for providing, as a matter of discretion, appropriately cleared staff and contractor personnel of other Federal agencies with access to classified historical CIA records that their agency has requested when such access is not expressly required by statute.
#### In re WHITE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 16, 1903.)

In the matter of the application of John A. White for admission to the bar.

No opinion. Application granted.
J. A1 5 0 19 /18

NON
- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION
– SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

v. :
: ROBIN DWAYNE SMITH , : No. 1927 M DA 20 17
: Appellant :

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence , November 15 , 2017, in the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County Criminal Division at No. CP

- 28

- CR

- 0001098

- 2016

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., MURRAY , J., AND FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.

DISSENTING MEMORANDUM STATEMENT BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.:

FILED AUGUST 29, 2018
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s disposition in th is matter.
Although I agree that there exists ample support for the trial court’s
determination that Officer Lynch possessed the requisite probable cause to
stop appellant’s vehicle, based upon a violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3111(a), m y

review of the record simply does not support the majority’s conclu sion that
appellant voluntarily consented to the blood draw. Quite the contrary, there

are a number of factors in this case that weigh against a finding of

voluntariness, including: the fact that appellant was placed in handcuffs when
he was transported to the hospital ; was under arrest at the time of the blood

draw; and was not read a DL

- 26 form informing him of his right to refuse a

blood draw

. Our supreme court has held that,J. A1 5 0 19 /18

- 2

- [i] n determining the validity of a given consent, the Commonwealth bears t he burden of establishing that a consent is the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice

— not the result of duress or coercion, express or implied, or a will overborne

— under the totality of the circumstances. The standard for measuring the s cope of a person’ s consent is based on an objective evaluation of what a reasonable person would have understood by the exchange between the officer and the person who gave the consent. Such evaluation includes an objective examination of the maturity, so phistication and mental or emotional state of the defendant. G auging the scope of a defendant’ s consent is an inherent and necessary part of the process of determining, on the totality of the circumstances presented, whether the consent is objectively val id, or instead the product of coercion, deceit, or misrepresentation.

Commonwealth v. Smith , 77 A.3d 562, 573 (Pa. 2013) (internal citations,
quotation marks , and brackets omitted).

B ased on the totality of circumstances, I do not believe that a reasonable

person in appellant’s position would have understood that they were
voluntarily consenting to a blood draw by simply choosing to remain silent

. As such, without appellant’s consent and without a warrant, appellant’s blood

draw was an unlawful s earch under both the Fourth Amendment to the United
States Constitution and Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.
Accordingly, I would find that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s

motion to suppress the results of his blood alco hol test.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-57-2020]

On September 2, 2020, Patheon Puerto Rico, Inc. (Patheon), submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 7L, in Manatí, Puerto Rico.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (85 FR 56577—56578). On December 31, 2020, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act                           ( print page 501)                        and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: December 31, 2020.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-29271 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  OCTOBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000                 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                  NOV-01-1994               
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                          2,072
<SECURITIES>                    0               
<RECEIVABLES>                   18,879              
<ALLOWANCES>                    1,070          
<INVENTORY>                     25,238         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                46,356         
<PP&E>                          22,368         
<DEPRECIATION>                  11,739         
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  61,421         
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           26,479         
<BONDS>                         0              
<COMMON>                        543            
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0              
<PREFERRED>                     0              
<OTHER-SE>                      6,940          
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    61,421          
<SALES>                         89,632         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                89,632         
<CGS>                           85,164         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   85,164         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0              
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0              
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              4,250          
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 204            
<INCOME-TAX>                    0              
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             204            
<DISCONTINUED>                  0              
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0              
<CHANGES>                       0              
<NET-INCOME>                    204            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .04            
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .04            
        


</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 19—COTTON STATISTICS AND ESTIMATES**

Sec.
471.
Statistics and estimates of grades and staple length of cotton; collection and publication.
472.
Information furnished of confidential character; penalty for divulging information.
473.
Persons required to furnish information; request; failure to furnish; false information.
473a.
Cotton classification services.
473b.
Market supply, demand, condition and prices; collection and publication of information.
473c.
Rules and regulations.
473c–1.
Offenses in relation to sampling of cotton for classification.
473c–2.
Penalties for offenses relating to sampling of cotton.
473c–3.
Liability of principal for act of agent.
473d.
Quality tests and analyses by Secretary for breeders and others; fees.
474.
Powers of Secretary of Agriculture; appropriation.
475.
Repealed.
476.
Acreage reports.
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Yaron Elad, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date March 13, 2012
/s/ Yaron EladYaron EladVice - President & Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
<PAGE>   1
                              EAC INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  For The Nine Months                   For The Three Months
                                                                   Ended October 31,                     Ended October 31,
                                                             -----------------------------         -----------------------------
                                                                1996               1995              1996                1995
                                                             ----------         ----------         ----------         ----------
<S>                                                          <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>
NET INCOME (LOSS)                                            $  (65,310)        $  207,076         $   25,999         $   (6,007)
                                                             ==========         ==========         ==========         ========== 
SHARES:
   Weighted average shares outstanding                        2,311,687          2,311,687          2,311,687          2,311,687
   Other - options, warrants etc.                                   -                  -                  -                  -     
                                                             ----------         ----------         ----------         ----------
                                                              2,311,687          2,311,687          2,311,687          2,311,687
                                                             ==========         ==========         ==========         ==========
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                                        $(.03)              $.09              $ .01              $   -  
                                                                  =====               ====              =====              =====
</TABLE>




                                 - Exhibit 11 -





                                                                        Page 11.
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. HENDRICKSON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 16, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Vincent Hendrickson.

No opinion. Motion granted.
#### ANDREWS, Respondent, v. WESTERN NEW YORK & P. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 27, 1903.)

Action by Jennie Andrews, as administratrix, etc., against the Western New York & Pennsylvania Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
##### 



Exhibit 12
 Sybase, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands, except for ratios)
(For the years ended December 31,)
 2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Earnings:Income before income taxes
and cumulative effect of an
accounting change
    
    $
    136,714
    
    
    $
    100,966
    
    
    $
    118,095
    
    
    $
    71,209
    
    
    $
    978Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    20,233
    
    
    
    11,988
    
    
    
    13,204
    
    
    
    14,556
    
    
    
    10,610Total Earnings, as defined
    
    
    156,947
    
    
    
    112,954
    
    
    
    131,299
    
    
    
    85,765
    
    
    
    11,588Fixed ChargesInterest Expense
    
    
    8,116
    
    
    
    308
    
    
    
    62
    
    
    
    198
    
    
    
    276Amortization of debt expense
    
    
    1,671
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Estimated interest portion
on rental expense
    
    
    10,446
    
    
    
    11,680
    
    
    
    13,142
    
    
    
    14,358
    
    
    
    10,334Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    20,233
    
    
    
    11,988
    
    
    
    13,204
    
    
    
    14,556
    
    
    
    10,610Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    7.8
    
    
    
    9.4
    
    
    
    9.9
    
    
    
    5.9
    
    
    
    1.1
From: Rogers, Bob

To: Fritchie, Denis; Holt, Jim

Subject: FW: report from meeting

Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 3:12:33 PM

Attachments: SIP AMENDMENT Mayor"s Powerpoint 8-30-13.ppt

Carter used this for the muni mayors to explain our SIP. I think it could be a good basis to use at

MPO presentations and possibly the public hearing when we get around to that.

Bob Rogers, Manager

Pollution Control

Shelby County Health Department

814 Jefferson Ave.

Memphis TN 38105

(901)222-9599

From: Gray, Carter 

Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 11:29 AM

To: Rogers, Bob

Subject: report from meeting

It went well, but he took a copy of the draft plan to read so hold your breath. Attached is the final

powerpoint.

He looks like he wants to get back with the other mayors sooner rather than later. I mentioned the

Conference call with EPA was now scheduled for the 10th ( or at least that is my recollection) and so I

think we will be reconvening the meeting with the mayors around the 17th. I have been told to get him

a draft letter inviting them to such a meeting and he will be filing in the date. I hate being at 160..

Carter
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27


                           AMERICAN VANTAGE COMPANIES
                    7674 WEST LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD, SUITE 108
                             LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89128


                                                  October 25, 2002

Mr. Roy K. Keefer
6101 Golden Saddle Road
Las Vegas, NV   89130

                           Re:      Employment Agreement

Dear Roy:

                  This letter shall serve to confirm and memorialize our
agreement that the option (the "April 2002 Option") granted to you pursuant to
Paragraph 5(c)(ii) of the Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2002 (the
"Employment Agreement"), between American Vantage Companies ("AVC") and you, to
purchase 9,269 shares of common stock of AVC at a purchase price of $2.49 per
share, exercisable commencing on April 1, 2002 and expiring on March 31, 2012,
as evidenced by the Incentive Stock Option Agreement, dated April 1, 2002,
between AVC and you, has been cancelled, voided and nullified, effective as of
July 31, 2002; and you agree that you shall have no further right to purchase
these 9,269 shares of AVC's common stock pursuant to Paragraph 5(c)(ii) of the
Employment Agreement.

                  If the foregoing accurately reflects our agreement with
respect to the cancellation of the April 2002 Option, please indicate such by
signing your name in the space indicated for such below.


                                        Very truly yours,

                                        American Vantage Companies


                                        By: /s/ Ronald J. Tassinari
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                       [Name, Title]


Acknowledged and accepted
as of the date first set forth above:

/s/ Roy K. Keefer
-------------------------------------
            Roy K. Keefer
### §192. Homeland Security Institute

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall establish a federally funded research and development center to be known as the "Homeland Security Institute" (in this section referred to as the "Institute").

#### (b) Administration

The Institute shall be administered as a separate entity by the Secretary.

#### (c) Duties

The duties of the Institute shall be determined by the Secretary, and may include the following:

(1) Systems analysis, risk analysis, and simulation and modeling to determine the vulnerabilities of the Nation's critical infrastructures and the effectiveness of the systems deployed to reduce those vulnerabilities.

(2) Economic and policy analysis to assess the distributed costs and benefits of alternative approaches to enhancing security.

(3) Evaluation of the effectiveness of measures deployed to enhance the security of institutions, facilities, and infrastructure that may be terrorist targets.

(4) Identification of instances when common standards and protocols could improve the interoperability and effective utilization of tools developed for field operators and first responders.

(5) Assistance for Federal agencies and departments in establishing testbeds to evaluate the effectiveness of technologies under development and to assess the appropriateness of such technologies for deployment.

(6) Design of metrics and use of those metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of homeland security programs throughout the Federal Government, including all national laboratories.

(7) Design of and support for the conduct of homeland security-related exercises and simulations.

(8) Creation of strategic technology development plans to reduce vulnerabilities in the Nation's critical infrastructure and key resources.

#### (d) Consultation on Institute activities

In carrying out the duties described in subsection (c), the Institute shall consult widely with representatives from private industry, institutions of higher education, nonprofit institutions, other Government agencies, and federally funded research and development centers.

#### (e) Use of centers

The Institute shall utilize the capabilities of the National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center.

#### (f) Annual reports

The Institute shall transmit to the Secretary and Congress an annual report on the activities of the Institute under this section.

#### (g) Termination

The Homeland Security Institute shall terminate 5 years after its establishment.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title III, §312, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2176; Pub. L. 108–334, title V, §519, Oct. 18, 2004, 118 Stat. 1318.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 108–334 amended heading and text of subsec. (g) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The Homeland Security Institute shall terminate 3 years after the effective date of this chapter."