alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joseph Large

Large Joe Photo LLC P.O. Box 6776 Breckenridge, CO 80424
Phone: ( 215) 565 5317 Email: joe@josephlarge.com
Exemption: Section 333

Extent & Reason: I am a professional photographer and filmmaker based in Breckenridge, CO. (www.josephlarge.com) I have been operating since 200 3 and I have become one of the most used

resource in Breckenridge and the surrounding areas. I have recently invested in several drones (DJI Inspire 1 & two DJI Phantom 2's) and would like to use the drone for aerial video and photography. Aerial photography and video has become a vital part of marketing real estate as it shows homes and the environment in their entirety.

Benefits: My use of drone video and photography would help the real estate agents and companies market properties in the area. With our already booming real estate market in the Colorado mountains, the level of service I provide with the drones would take the appeal to a new level.
Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety: I only fly the drone s in the best possible conditions ( winds less than mph ). I fly very low as most homes are not over 2 stories tall. Also, homes in the mountains are usually very secluded and most people won't even me flying them.
Summary: Large Joe Photo LLC ( Joseph Large ) is seeking an exemption for Section 333 in order to fly a drone (unmanned aircraft) commercially to help market real estate in Breckenridge, CO.
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification of the

Chief Financial Officer

I, Michael Smith, the chief financial officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.

/s/ Michael SmithMichael Smith August 13,
2007
Opinion issued April 8, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00732
- CV

——————————— IN RE CARLOS DAVID V ELASCO , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Carlos David Velasco, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging the trial court’s issuance of a protective order and asking that we “find the protective order v oid” and “order that the records [of the child’s testimony at2

the protective order hearing] be unsealed [and] that the trial court vacate its prior order and notify the authorities.” 1

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.

1 The underlying case is Ofelia Leija v. Carlos David Velasco , cause number 2012

- 71321, pending in the 280th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Hon. Lynn Bradshaw

- Hull presiding.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant
To 18 U.S.C. 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey H. Sakamoto, Vice PresidentFinance and Administration of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: |  | June 25, 2004 |  | /s/ Jeffrey H. SakamotoJeffrey H. Sakamoto Chief Financial Officer
|----- |  | ------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Vehicle Date Bag 1 City Bag 2 Hwy Bag 1 Avg Bag 2 Avg Delta Bag 1Delta Bag 2Delta Bag 1 Avg Delta Bag 2 Avg 20-May A/C Off, Denso SAS 346.5 206.8 21-May A/C Off, Denso SAS 342.1 205.6 22-May A/C Off, Denso SAS 319.6 204.4 23-May A/C Off, Denso SAS 318.4 205.3 319.0 204.9 3-JunA/C Off, Denso Baseline 320.7 210.0 4-JunA/C Off, Denso Baseline 320.8 205.6 5-JunA/C Off, Denso Baseline 315.6 204.4 6-JunA/C Off, Denso Baseline 317.1 205.6 316.4 205.0 20-May A/C On, Denso SAS 396.4 216.7 49.9 9.9 21-May A/C On, Denso SAS 371.9 215.9 29.8 10.3 22-May A/C On, Denso SAS 357.1 213.8 37.5 9.4 23-May A/C On, Denso SAS 358.2 214.2 357.7 214.0 39.8 8.9 38.7 9.1 3-JunA/C On, Denso Baseline 366.9 220.9 46.2 10.9 4-JunA/C On, Denso Baseline 354.6 215.3 33.8 9.7 5-JunA/C On, Denso Baseline 359.0 214.8 43.4 10.4 6-JunA/C On, Denso Baseline 354.3 215.6 356.7 215.2 37.2 10.0 40.2 10.30.091 0.115 0.365 0.112 delta =Avg

23.9

25.21.3
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our reports dated February 15, 1996 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of North Star Universal, Inc. and Subsidiaries
included in the Annual Report of North Star Universal, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1995.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the registration statements of North Star
Universal, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-15257 effective July 19, 1987; File
No.33-15258, effective July 19, 1987; and File No. 33-34748, effective May 29,
1990).


We have issued our reports dated February 15, 1996 accompanying the combined
financial statements and schedule of ENStar (an operating unit of North star
Universal, Inc.) included in the Annual Report of North Star Universal, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the registration statements of
North Star Universal, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-15257 effective July 19,
1987; File NO. 33-15258, effective July 19, 1987; and File No. 33-34748,
effective May 29, 1990).


                                                         /s/GRANT THORNTON LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 15, 1996

We have issued our reports dated February 14, 1996 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Michael Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries which
are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of North Star Universal, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 1995.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the registration statements of North star
Universal, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-15257 effective July 19, 1987; File
No. 33-15258, effective July 19, 1987; and File No. 33-34748, effective May 29,
1990).


                                                         /s/GRANT THORNTON LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 14, 1996
### Part A—Organization and Publications
Exhibit 10.2
 DEX ONE CORPORATION EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
(Time-Vested Award)
 [Template for Executive Officers]
 * * * * *
 Participant:
 Grant Date:
 Per Share Exercise Price:
 Number of Shares subject to this Option:
  Agreement Company Plan
  Incorporation By Reference; Plan Document Receipt .




---



##### 



Grant of Option . Option Option Shares
 Vesting and Exercise .
 Vesting
 Vesting Date
    
    Number of Shares[      ]
    
    [      ]
  Accelerated Vesting; Committee Discretion to Accelerate Vesting Cause Good Reason
 2




---



##### 



Change in Control Change in Control
 Expiration
 Certain Definitions Cause Good Reason Change in Control Employment
Agreement
 Termination .
 General
 Termination for Cause provided
 3




---



##### 



Treatment of Unvested Option upon Termination
 Method of Exercise and Payment .
 Non-Transferability .
 Governing Law .
 Withholding of Tax .
 4




---



##### 



Entire Agreement; Amendment .
 Notices .
 No Right to Service .
 Transfer of Personal Data .
 Compliance with Laws .
 Section 409A .
 Binding Agreement; Assignment .
 5




---



##### 



Headings .
 Counterparts .
 Further Assurances .
 Severability .
 Acquired Rights .
  6




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 DEX ONE CORPORATIONBy:Name:
    Gretchen ZechTitle:
    Senior Vice President, Human ResourcesPARTICIPANT[                     ] 7
December 14, 2015 

Dear Mr. Brantley: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3550). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Your petition references the material listed below, however the material was not 

submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials: 

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM). 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/28/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Program Analyst
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. SADE O. STEWART, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 640 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 3rd day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
### §9204. Adverse action

(a) First Violation.—If the Director of the Office of Personnel Management determines, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing on the record, that an employee of an agency has violated section 9202, the Director shall—

(1) issue to the employee a written warning that includes a description of the violation and the additional penalties that may apply for subsequent violations; and

(2) file such warning in the employee's official personnel record file.

(b) Subsequent Violations.—If the Director of the Office of Personnel Management determines, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing on the record, that an employee that was subject to subsection (a) has committed a subsequent violation of section 9202, the Director may take the following action:

(1) For a second violation, suspension of the employee for a period of not more than 7 days.

(2) For a third violation, suspension of the employee for a period of more than 7 days.

(3) For a fourth violation—

(A) suspension of the employee for a period of more than 7 days; and

(B) a civil penalty against the employee in an amount that is not more than $250.

(4) For a fifth violation—

(A) suspension of the employee for a period of more than 7 days; and

(B) a civil penalty against the employee in an amount that is not more than $500.

(5) For any subsequent violation—

(A) suspension of the employee for a period of more than 7 days; and

(B) a civil penalty against the employee in an amount that is not more than $1,000.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XI, §1122(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1606.)
### §8139. Employees of the District of Columbia

Compensation awarded to an employee of the government of the District of Columbia shall be paid in the manner provided by statute for the payment of the general expenses of the government of the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 550.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 794 (less 1st sentence). | July 11, 1919, ch. 7, §11 (less 1st sentence), 41 Stat. 104. |

Statutes at Large

The words "Compensation awarded" are substituted for "Such compensation as the Secretary may award".

The last sentence of former section 794, requiring that the Commissioners of the District of Columbia submit to Congress through the Bureau of the Budget estimates of appropriations, is omitted as obsolete. The Budget and Accounting Act, 1921, as amended, 31 U.S.C. 2 et seq., prescribes the procedures for presenting all budget estimates for the government of the District of Columbia and provides that the budget submission to Congress be made by the President.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Processing of Claims Filed by District of Columbia Employees

See Pub. L. 93–198, title II, §204(e), Dec. 24, 1973, 87 Stat. 783, set out as a note under section 8101 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1

EAGLE EXPLORATION COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Raymond N. Joeckel, the President and Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Exploration Company, (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 14, 2007



/s/ Raymond N. JoeckelName:

Raymond N. JoeckelTitle:

President and Chief Financial Officer
### Geology of the eastern part of the Harold D. Roberts Tunnel, Colorado (Stations 690+00 to 1238+58)

By: Lawrence Allen WarnerCharles Sherwood Robinson**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp831D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE>

              EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
               EDISON BROTHERS STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
<CAPTION>

                                        
                                        4 Weeks   13 Weeks  39 Weeks
                                        Ended     Ended     Ended
Nov 1,    Nov 2,    Nov 1,
                                         1997     1996      1996

                               (In thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                     <C>       <C>       <C>
Income/(Loss) from continuing operations          $(6,794)       $(11,460)
$(54,350)
Preferred stock dividends                  ----   ----      ----
Net Income/(Loss) applicable to common
     stock                              $(6,794)  $(11,460) $(54,350)

SIMPLE AND PRIMARY
 Weighted average shares outstanding    10,225    22,202    22,180
  Net effect of dilutive stock options
     based on the treasury method
TOTAL                                   10,225    22,202    22,180

Per common share amounts:  Simple
   Net Income/(Loss) applicable to common
     stock                              $ (.67)   $ (.52)      $(2.45)

Per common share amounts:  Primary
   Net Income/(Loss) applicable to common
      stock                             $ (.67)   $   (.52) $    (2.45)

FULLY DILUTED
  Weighted average shared outstanding   10,225    22,202    22,180
  Net effect of dilutive stock options -
     based on the treasury method

TOTAL                                   10,225    22,202    22,180

Per common share amounts:  Fully Diluted
  Net Income/(Loss) applicable to common
     stock                              $  (.67)  $  (.52)  $   (2.45)

</TABLE>
§ 21.210 What are the purposes of the DGARS? The purposes of the DGARS are to provide uniform policies and procedures for DoD Components' awards, in order to meet DoD needs for: ( a ) Efficient program execution, effective program oversight, and proper stewardship of Federal funds.
( b ) Compliance with relevant statutes; Executive orders; and applicable guidance, such as Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circulars.
( c ) Collection from DoD Components, retention, and dissemination of management and fiscal data related to awards.
<PAGE>  1
                                                          EXHIBIT 21
                                     WICOR, Inc.
                          Subsidiaries of the Registrant

                                      State or Country        Percent Voting
Subsidiaries of WICOR, Inc.        in Which Incorporated        Stock Owned 
 

Wisconsin Gas Company                       Wisconsin               100%

WICOR Energy Service Company                Wisconsin               100%

FieldTech, Inc.                             Wisconsin               100%

WICOR Industries, Inc.                      Wisconsin               100%

                                       State or Country       Percent Voting
Subsidiaries of Industries, Inc.     in Which Incorporated      Stock Owned

Sta-Rite Industries, Inc.                   Wisconsin               100%

SHURflo Pump Manufacturing Company          California              100%

Hypro Corporation                           Minnesota               100%

WEXCO of Delaware, Inc.                     Delaware                100%

WICOR FSC, Inc.                             Barbados                100%

Subsidiaries of Sta-Rite               State or Country       Percent Voting
       Industries, Inc.             in Which Incorporated       Stock Owned

WICOR Canada Inc.                           Canada                  100%

Sta-Rite de Mexico                          Mexico                   80%

Sta-Rite Industries GmbH                    Germany                  .5%
   Europa 

WICOR Industries 
  (Australia) Pty. Ltd.                     Australia               100%

Onga (New Zealand) Pty. Ltd.                New Zealand             100%

Sta-Rite Holdings, B.V.                     Netherlands             100%

Nocchi Pompe S.p.A.                         Italy                    47%

Webster Electric Co.                        Delaware                100%

Hydro-Flow Filtration Systems, Inc.         California               80%

  Subsidiary of WICOR                    Country in Which     Percent Voting
  (Australia) Pty. Ltd.                     Incorporated        Stock Owned

Onga Pty. Ltd.                              Australia               100%

Dega Research  Pty. Ltd.                    Australia               100%

Subsidiaries of Sta-Rite                 Country in Which     Percent Voting
     Holdings, B.V.                        Incorporated        Stock Owned

Sta-Rite Industries                         Germany                95.5%
GmbH Europa

Nocchi Pompe S.p.A.                         Italy                    30%

Subsidiary of Nocchi Pompe,              Country in Which     Percent Voting
          S.p.A.                           Incorporated           Stock 
Owned

Midi Pompes S.a.r.l.                        France                  100%

Nocchi Pompe Moscow                         Russia                   90%

Subsidiary of SHURflo Pump               Country in Which     Percent Voting
   Manufacturing Company                   Incorporated         Stock Owned

SHURflo Ltd.                                England                 100%
#### § 34.20 Purpose of property standards.

Sections 34.21 through 34.25 set forth uniform standards for management, use, and disposition of property. DoD Components shall encourage recipients to use existing property-management systems, to the extent that the systems meet these minimum requirements.
§ 37.415 Should I address cost sharing in the announcement or solicitation? To help ensure a competitive process that is fair and equitable to all potential proposers, you should state clearly in the solicitation: ( a ) That, to the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal parties carrying out a research project under a TIA are to provide at least half of the costs of the project (see § 37.215(b)).
( b ) The types of cost sharing that are acceptable;
( c ) How any in-kind contributions will be valued, in accordance with §§ 37.530 through 37.555; and
( d ) Whether you will give any consideration to alternative approaches a proposer may offer to demonstrate its strong commitment to and self-interest in the project's success, in accordance with § 37.215.
### SUBCHAPTER I—FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE