alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 44.4 Policy. It is DoD policy that: ( a ) Members of the Ready Reserve shall be screened (see the appendix to this part for specific screening guidance) at least annually to meet the provisions of 10 U.S.C. 10149 and to provide a Ready Reserve force composed of members who: ( 1 ) Meet Military Service readiness standards of mental, moral, professional, and physical fitness and possess the military qualifications required in the various ranks, ratings, and specialties.
( 2 ) Are available immediately for active duty (AD) during a mobilization or as otherwise required by law.
( b ) Ready Reserve members whose immediate recall to AD during an emergency would create an extreme personal or community hardship shall be transferred to the Standby Reserve or the Retired Reserve, or shall be discharged, as applicable.
( c ) Ready Reserve members who occupy key positions shall be transferred to the Standby Reserve or the Retired Reserve, or shall be discharged, as appropriate.
( d ) After a mobilization is ordered, no deferment, delay, or exemption from mobilization will be granted to Ready Reserve members because of their civilian employment.
§ 37.1000 What are my responsibilities at the time of award? At the time of the award, you must: ( a ) Ensure that the award document contains the appropriate terms and conditions and is signed by the appropriate parties, in accordance with §§ 37.1005 through 37.1015.
( b ) Document your analysis of the agreement in the award file, as discussed in § 37.1020.
( c ) Provide information about the award to offices responsible for reporting, as described in § 37.1025.
( d ) Distribute copies of the award document, as required by § 37.1045.
[68 FR 47160, Aug. 7, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 51246, Aug. 19, 2020]
Abatement Order filed February 9, 2017 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-01014-CR

____________

CHARLES ALLEN HAWKINS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 239th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 61720

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant is not represented by counsel on appeal. This court is unaware 

whether appellant is entitled to appointment of counsel and to proceed without the 

payment of costs. Accordingly, we enter the following order. 

We ORDER the judge of the 239th District Court to immediately conduct a 

hearing at which appellant and counsel for the State shall be present to determine 

whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is 
indigent and, thus entitled to appointed counsel and a free record. The judge shall 

appoint appellate counsel for appellant, if necessary. The judge shall see that a record 

of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall 

order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing the findings and conclusions. Those records shall be filed with the 

clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the 

court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party 

seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule 

a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, 

the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties 

of such date.

PER CURIAM
§ 934.16 Required program amendments. Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(f)(1), North Dakota is required to submit to OSM by the specified date the following written, proposed program amendment, or a description of an amendment to be proposed that meets the requirements of SMCRA and 30 CFR Chapter VII and a timetable for enactment that is consistent with North Dakota's established administrative or legislative procedures. ( a ) - ( cc ) [Reserved]
[53 FR 2840, Feb. 2, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 10145, Mar. 10, 1989; 55 FR 1819, Jan. 19, 1990; 57 FR 827, Jan. 9, 1992; 59 FR 11933, Mar. 15, 1994; 59 FR 37431, July 22, 1994; 60 FR 18745, Apr. 13, 1995; 60 FR 36223, July 14, 1995; 62 FR 22895, Apr. 28, 1997; 63 FR 49434, Sept. 16, 1998; 64 FR 1130, Jan. 8, 1999; 64 FR 60660, Nov. 8, 1999]
E xhibit 32.2
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Hurco Companies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Stephen J. Alesia
 Stephen J. Alesia
 Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
 January 19, 2005
§ 1801.22 Action and determination(s) by originator(s) or any interested party. ( a ) *Initial action for access.* NACIC offices tasked pursuant to a Privacy Act access request shall search all relevant record systems within their cognizance. They shall: ( 1 ) Determine whether responsive records exist;
( 2 ) Determine whether access must be denied in whole or part and on what legal basis under both Acts in each such case;
( 3 ) Approve the disclosure of records for which they are the originator; and
( 4 ) Forward to the Coordinator all records approved for release or necessary for coordination with or referral to another originator or interested party as well as the specific determinations with respect to denials (if any).
( b ) *Initial action for amendment.* NACIC offices tasked pursuant to a Privacy Act amendment request shall review the official records alleged to be inaccurate and the proposed amendment submitted by the requester. If they determine that NACIC's records are not accurate, relevant, timely or complete, they shall promptly: ( 1 ) Make the amendment as requested;
( 2 ) Write to all other identified persons or agencies to whom the record has been disclosed (if an accounting of the disclosure was made) and inform of the amendment; and
( 3 ) Inform the Coordinator of such decisions.
( c ) *Action otherwise on amendment request.* If the NACIC office records manager declines to make the requested amendment (or declines to make the requested amendment) but agrees to augment the official records, that manager shall promptly: ( 1 ) Set forth the reasons for refusal; and
( 2 ) Inform the Coordinator of such decision and the reasons therefore.
( d ) *Referrals and coordinations.* As applicable and within ten (10) days of receipt by the Coordinator, any NACIC records containing information originated by other NACIC offices shall be forwarded to those entities for action in accordance with paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) of this section and return. Records originated by other federal agencies or NACIC records containing other federal information shall be forwarded to such agencies within ten (10) days of our completion of initial action in the case for action under their regulations and direct response to the requester (for other NACIC records) or return to NACIC (for NACIC records).
( e ) *Effect of certain exemptions.* This section shall not be construed to allow access to systems of records exempted by the Director, NACIC pursuant to subsections (j) and (k) of the Privacy Act or where those exemptions require that NACIC can neither confirm nor deny the existence or nonexistence of responsive records.
§ 37.685 May I allow for-profit firms to purchase real property and equipment with project funds? ( a ) With the two exceptions described in paragraph (b) of this section, you must require a for-profit firm to purchase real property or equipment with its own funds that are separate from the research project. You should allow the firm to charge to an expenditure-based TIA only depreciation or use charges for real property or equipment (and your cost estimate for a fixed-support TIA only would include those costs). Note that the firm must charge depreciation consistently with its usual accounting practice. Many firms treat depreciation as an indirect cost. Any firm that usually charges depreciation indirectly for a particular type of property must not charge depreciation for that property as a direct cost to the TIA.
( b ) In two situations, you may grant an exception and allow a for-profit firm to use project funds, which includes both the Federal Government and recipient shares, to purchase real property or equipment (*i.e.,* to charge to the project the full acquisition cost of the property). The two circumstances, which should be infrequent for equipment and extremely rare for real property, are those in which you either: ( 1 ) Judge that the real property or equipment will be dedicated to the project and have a current fair market value that is less than $5,000 by the time the project ends; or
( 2 ) Give prior approval for the firm to include the full acquisition cost of the real property or equipment as part of the cost of the project (see § 37.535).
( c ) If you grant an exception in either of the circumstances described in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section, you must make the real property or equipment subject to the property management standards in 32 CFR 34.21(b) through (d). As provided in those standards, the title to the real property or equipment will vest conditionally in the for-profit firm upon acquisition. Your TIA, whether it is a fixed-support or expenditure-based award, must specify that any item of equipment that has a fair market value of $5,000 or more at the conclusion of the project also will be subject to the disposition process in 32 CFR 34.21(e), whereby the Federal Government will recover its interest in the property at that time.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XUMANII INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS CORP., a Nevada corporation,

Petitioner,

v.

U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Respondent. No. 14

- 73103

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Securities & Exchange Commission

Argued and Submitted October 19, 2016

Stanford, California

Before: CALLAHAN, HURWITZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Xumanii International Holdings Corp. (“Xumanii”) petitions for review of an

order of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“ SEC ”) suspending trading in

Xumanii’s stock for ten days. We dismiss the petition in part and deny it in part.

1. Xumanii did n ot exhaust its claims before the SEC. An SEC rule, 17

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

NOV 3 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K
U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

C.F.R. § 201.550(a), provides for post

- deprivation review of trading suspensions

.

But, Xumanii did not avail itself of this process, and thus failed to exhaust the non

constitutional claims raised in its petition for review

. Because t he exhaustion

requirement in 15 U.S.C. § 78y(c)(1) is jurisdictional

, Sacks v. SEC , 648 F.3d 945,

950 (9th Cir. 2011) , w e dismiss Xumanii’s petition for review insofar as it raises

non

- constituti o nal claims

.

2. Xumanii a lso contends that it was denied due process of law because it

was not provided a pre

- suspension hearing. Assuming without deciding that

§ 78y(c)(1) does not require exhaustion of this constitutional challenge, we hold that

Xumanii’s due process rights wer e adequately protected by the availability of a

prompt post

- deprivation review of the trading suspension. See Mathews v. Eldridge

,

424 U.S. 319, 334

– 35 (1976). We deny Xumanii’s petition to the extent i t asserts

constitutional claims.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART

.
### §491. National Homeland Security Council

There is established within the Executive Office of the President a council to be known as the "Homeland Security Council" (in this subchapter referred to as the "Council").

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IX, §901, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2258.)
#### § 230.2 Applicability.

This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), the Combatant Commands, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the Department of Defense (hereafter collectively referred to as “the DoD Components”) and all nonappropriated fund instrumentalities including the Military Exchange Services and morale, welfare and recreation (MWR) activities.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1150 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1150

Expressing support for the designation of April 16, 2024, as ``FairTax 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2024

    Mr. Carter of Georgia (for himself and Mr. Clyde) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                           and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of April 16, 2024, as ``FairTax 
                                 Day''.

Whereas the current United States tax code is over 7,000 pages;
Whereas Americans will spend over 6,000,000,000 hours working on filing their 
        taxes this year;
Whereas the FairTax would repeal the current tax code and replace it with a 
        single national consumption tax that is progrowth and allows Americans 
        to keep every cent of their hard-earned money;
Whereas the FairTax allows Americans to keep 100 percent of their hard-earned 
        paycheck and ends the Internal Revenue Service headache;
Whereas a family of four could spend $30,000 annually without paying a penny in 
        taxes;
Whereas, in addition to eliminating all personal and corporate income taxes, the 
        death tax, gift taxes, and the payroll tax, the FairTax would also 
        eliminate the need for the Internal Revenue Service; and
Whereas the FairTax is the only tax system that is simple, efficient, friendly 
        to economic growth, nondiscriminatory, unintrusive, and FAIR: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of ``FairTax Day''.
                                 <all>
```
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA-2013-0329

Directorate Identifier: 2012NM032AD

A330-27-3176 --- 7/26/11

A330-27-3176, R01 --- 3/27/12

A340-27-4162 --- 1/10/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit
32.1 Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350





The
undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies
that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2009 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act.
In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall
not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.





Date:
March 12, 2010








/s/Daniel
R. Daigneault


President
and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.2 to General Mills, Inc. Form 10-Q for quarterly period ended February 26, 2006







Exhibit 10.2 




AMENDMENT TO GENERAL
MILLS, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN 




Effective January 1, 2006, the
General Mills, Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan is amended to provide that participants
shall receive a single sum distribution of their entire benefit on the February 1
immediately following their separation from service, subject to the other provision of
§409A of the Internal Revenue Code (for example, the six month delay imposed on
specified employees under §409A(a)(2)(B)(i)).
### §321i. Use of commercially available technology, goods, and services

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) the Secretary should, to the maximum extent possible, use off-the-shelf commercially developed technologies to ensure that the Department's information technology systems allow the Department to collect, manage, share, analyze, and disseminate information securely over multiple channels of communication; and

(2) in order to further the policy of the United States to avoid competing commercially with the private sector, the Secretary should rely on commercial sources to supply the goods and services needed by the Department.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title V, §520, formerly §509, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2215; renumbered §520, Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §611(6), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1395.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 319 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 109–295.
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification of the

Chief Financial Officer

I, Michael Smith, the chief financial officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.

/s/ Michael SmithMichael Smith November 13,
2007
#### § 1800.11 Preliminary information.

Members of the public shall address all communications to the NACIC Coordinator as specified at § 1800.03 and clearly delineate the communication as a request under the Freedom of Information Act and this regulation. NACIC employees receiving a communication in the nature of a FOIA request shall expeditiously forward same to the Coordinator. Requests and appeals on requests, referrals, or coordinations received from members of the public who owe outstanding fees for information services at this or other federal agencies will not be accepted and action on all pending requests shall be terminated in such circumstances.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Hudson, Also Known as David Anderson, Appellant.

Appeal unanimously dismissed as moot. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court—attempted criminal possession of stolen property, third degree.) PresentMoule, J. P., Cardamone, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Schnepp, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000031364
<NAME>ECKERD CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1,000                                  
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                               8,421
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       93,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,000
<INVENTORY>                                        968,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,070,996
<PP&E>                                             716,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                     320,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,688,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              661,610
<BONDS>                                            768,705
<COMMON>                                               704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         123,488
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,688,849
<SALES>                                          3,887,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,887,422
<CGS>                                            3,043,658
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,043,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   708,836
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  46,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     85,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18,840
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 66,796
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        66,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .93 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .93 <F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS PRIMARY AND DILUTED REFLECTS THE TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT EFFECTED IN THE
    FORM OF A STOCK DIVIDEND WHICH WAS PAID ON MAY 13, 1996 TO STOCKHOLDERS OF
    RECORD ON APRIL 22, 1996.  
</FN>                                     
        

</TABLE>
#### Marilyn Umanoff, Respondent, v. Ivan Umanoff, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay of execution of two orders and a judgment, pending appeal, denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.