alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ROUNDY'S
INC. FROM 10-K405 FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 01-02-99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                      72,094,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               78,489,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                159,743,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           322,047,400
<PP&E>                                     214,592,300
<DEPRECIATION>                             103,955,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             462,411,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      237,304,100
<BONDS>                                     73,298,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,342,200
<OTHER-SE>                                 123,330,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               462,411,600
<SALES>                                  2,576,222,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,578,650,600
<CGS>                                    2,330,300,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,330,300,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           218,820,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,189,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,293,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,046,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,149,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,897,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,897,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. Inaccordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: March 13, 2009

 

/s/ F. STEPHEN WARD 

F. Stephen Ward

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
### §6332. General authority

Notwithstanding any provision of subchapter I, and subject to the provisions of this subchapter, the Office of Personnel Management shall establish a program under which annual leave accrued or accumulated by an employee may be transferred to the annual leave account of any other employee if such other employee requires additional leave because of a medical emergency.

(Added Pub. L. 100–566, §2(a), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2834.)
Exhibit 10.35

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 8

  TO TRADEMARK LICENSE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR MEN'S COLLECTIONS

     This  Amendment  no. 8,  dated as of March 29,  2006,  is to the  Trademark
License and Technical  Assistance  Agreement for Men's Collections dated January
15, 1998,  as  previously  amended (the  "Agreement"),  by and between  Latitude
Licensing  Corp.  ("Licensor")  and I.C.  Isaacs & Company L.P.  ("Licensee" who
together  with  Licensor,   are  hereinafter  referred  to  as  the  "Parties").
Capitalized terms used herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement
unless otherwise indicated.

     WHEREAS,  pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Agreement,  Licensee must annually
spend upon  advertising  of the Products  throughout  the Territory a minimum of
three  percent  (3%)  of Net  Sales  but no less  than  $500,000  (the  "Minimum
Advertising Expense"); and

     WHEREAS,  Licensor and Licensee wish to amend the Agreement with respect to
the  Minimum  Advertising  Expense for  2007-2009  to reflect an increase in the
advertising budget for 2007-2009 in order to, among other things, facilitate and
support a repositioning of the Girbaud brand for better store distribution.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the  foregoing,  and the  terms and
provisions hereinbelow set forth, and for good and valuable  consideration,  the
sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged,  the Parties agree, as
follows:

     1.   Section 8 - Advertising and Promotion

     Section 8.1 of the  Agreement is hereby  amended by inserting the following
at the end of the first sentence thereof before the period thereto:

          ",  provided  that  for  each of  2007,  2008  and  2009  the  Minimum
          Advertising Expense shall be increased by an additional $200,000."

     2.   Full Force and Effect

     Except  as  expressly  amended  herby,  the  Agreement  and all  terms  and
provisions thereof are and shall continue to be in full force and effect.


                            [Signatures on Next Page]


<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, by their duly authorized  representatives,
have executed this Amendment no. 8 as of the date first above written.


LATITUDE LICENSING CORP.             I.C. ISAACS & COMPANY L.P.

                                     By: I.C. Isaacs & Company, Inc.,
                                           its General Partner
By:    /s/ Serge J. Massat
      --------------------------
Name:  Serge J Massat
      --------------------------
Title: Secretary                     By: /s/ Peter J. Rizzo
      --------------------------         ---------------------------------------
                                         Peter J. Rizzo, Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7189** 

GEORGE BRIDGES, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JERRY R. TOWNSEND, Assistant Warden; ELIZA S. WILLIS, Treatment Program Supervisor; M. K. LEFEVERS, NCC Unit Manager , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 2:12

- cv
- 00703

- MSD

- TEM )

Submitted : November 19 , 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER , KING , and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

George Bridges, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George Bridges, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Bridges v. Townsend , No. 2:12

- cv
- 00703

- MSD

- TEM (E.D.

Va. filed July 2, 2015 , entered July 6, 2015 ) . We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented i n the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York v. Frank Walker.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
### §30303. Tracking and data relay satellite services

(a) Contracts.—The Administration is authorized, when so provided in an appropriation Act, to enter into and to maintain a contract for tracking and data relay satellite services. Such services shall be furnished to the Administration in accordance with applicable authorization and appropriations Acts. The Government shall incur no costs under such contract prior to the furnishing of such services except that the contract may provide for the payment for contingent liability of the Government which may accrue in the event the Government should decide for its convenience to terminate the contract before the end of the period of the contract. Facilities which may be required in the performance of the contract may be constructed on Government-owned lands if there is included in the contract a provision under which the Government may acquire title to the facilities, under terms and conditions agreed upon in the contract, upon termination of the contract.

(b) Reports to Congress.—The Administrator shall in January of each year report to the Committee on Science and Technology and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate the projected aggregate contingent liability of the Government under termination provisions of any contract authorized in this section through the next fiscal year. The authority of the Administration to enter into and to maintain the contract authorized hereunder shall remain in effect unless repealed by legislation enacted by Congress.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3363.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30303(a) | 42 U.S.C. 2463 (1st par.). | Pub. L. 95–76, §6, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 315; Pub. L. 103–437, §15(c)(3), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4592. |
| 30303(b) | 42 U.S.C. 2463 (last par.). | |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "Committee on Science and Technology" are substituted for "Committee on Science, Space, and Technology" on authority of section 1(a)(10) of Public Law 104–14 (2 U.S.C. note prec. 21), Rule X(1)(n) of the Rules of the House of Representatives, adopted by House Resolution No. 5 (106th Congress, January 6, 1999), and Rule X(1)(o) of the Rules of the House of Representatives, adopted by House Resolution No. 6 (110th Congress, January 5, 2007).

In subsection (b), the word "hereafter" is omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
#### Belle La Fountain, administratrix, and William La Fountain, administrator of the estate of Louis La Fountain, deceased, appellees, v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,785.

Action to recover damages for wrongful death. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ford county; the Hon. Stevens R. Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 6, 1925.

F. M. Thompson, for appellant.

Schneider *&*Schneider, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                AUG-2-1997
<CASH>                                      12,858,000
<SECURITIES>                                 9,661,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,660,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   884,000
<INVENTORY>                                 67,755,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           105,039,000
<PP&E>                                     269,944,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             157,558,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             249,795,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       89,431,000
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,965,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               249,795,000
<SALES>                                    485,320,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           485,320,000
<CGS>                                      360,669,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              360,669,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,905,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,166,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,166,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,166,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                Exhibit 18.2



June 18, 2002




Eagle Food Centers, Inc.
Route 67 and Knoxville Road
Milan, IL


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have been furnished with a copy of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eagle
Food Centers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended May 4, 2002, and
have read the Company's statements contained in the note entitled "Inventories"
to the consolidated financial statements included therein. The note entitled
"Inventories" states that the Company implemented a change in accounting
principle from valuing substantially all inventories utilizing the last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method to valuing all inventories utilizing the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method and states that the newly adopted accounting principle
is preferable in the circumstances because the FIFO method of valuing
inventories more clearly follows the actual flow of inventory, due to its
perishable nature, and more closely matches actual costs and revenues. In
accordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Company
officials the circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the
decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to February 2, 2002, nor have we audited the
information set forth in the aforementioned note entitled "Inventories" to the
consolidated financial statements; accordingly, we do not express an opinion
concerning the factual information contained therein.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have
not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method
of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the
Company's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business
judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Company's circumstances.


                                                        /s/ KPMG LLP
#### § 37.620 What financial management standards do I include for participants that are nonprofit?

So as not to force system changes for any State, local government, institution of higher education, or other nonprofit organization, your expenditure-based TIA's requirements for the financial management system of any nonprofit participant are the same as those that apply to the participant's other Federal assistance awards.

[85 FR 51245, Aug. 19, 2020]
§ 903.817 Performance standards—Underground mining activities. ( a ) Part 817 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Underground Mining Activities,* applies to any person who conducts underground mining activities, except § 817.116(a)(1) of this chapter regarding revegetation success standards, for which paragraph (b) of this section substitutes.
( b ) Standards for success shall be those identified at § 817.116(a)(2) and (b) of this chapter. Statistically valid sampling techniques for measuring success shall be included in the mining and reclamation plan and approved by the regulatory authority.
#### In the Matter of Julio Camacho, Respondent, v John P. Iafrate, as Director of Pilgrim Psychiatric Center, Appellant.

In a proceeding, inter *alia,*to compel the production of various records maintained by Pilgrim Psychiatric Center (a State hospital), concerning a patient allegedly assaulted by petitioner, an employee of that State hospital, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 13, 1978, as "directs that the attorney for petitioner may inspect the records of the patient * * * at Pilgrim Psychiatric Center, should the aforesaid patient be called as a witness in the arbitration proceeding.” (The arbitration proceeding involves disciplinary charges brought against petitioner based upon the alleged assault.) Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. (See *Matter of Board of Educ. v Butcher,*61 AD2d 1011; *Matter of McWilliams v Haveliwala,*61 AD2d 1032; *People v Rensing,*14 NY2d 210.) Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O'Connor, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
GENICOM Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (FILE Nos. 33-29388, 33-41148,
33-49472, 33-53843 and 333-01845) of our report dated January 30, 1997, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of GENICOM Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 29, 1996 and
December 31, 1995 and for the three fiscal years in the period ended December
29, 1996, which report is included on page F-2 in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.





Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.

McLean, Virginia
March 27, 1997





                                     E - 24
### §235. Coordination of information and information technology

#### (a) Definition of affected agency

In this section, the term "affected agency" means—

(1) the Department;

(2) the Department of Agriculture;

(3) the Department of Health and Human Services; and

(4) any other department or agency determined to be appropriate by the Secretary.

#### (b) Coordination

The Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the head of each other department or agency determined to be appropriate by the Secretary, shall ensure that appropriate information (as determined by the Secretary) concerning inspections of articles that are imported or entered into the United States, and are inspected or regulated by 1 or more affected agencies, is timely and efficiently exchanged between the affected agencies.

#### (c) Report and plan

Not later than 18 months after November 25, 2002, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the head of each other department or agency determined to be appropriate by the Secretary, shall submit to Congress—

(1) a report on the progress made in implementing this section; and

(2) a plan to complete implementation of this section.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §427, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2187.)
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 11-2331

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

LAURIE BOHAN,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on August 30, 2012 is amended

as follows:

On the cover sheet replace "Laurie Bohan on brief pro se."

with "Benjamin L. Falkner, with whom Krasnoo|Klehm LLP was on

brief, for appellant."
#### Clara E. Bardwell, appellee, v. Citizens Trust & Savings Bank, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,361.

Suit to recover value of jewelry delivered to defendant for safekeeping. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joel C. Pitch, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Bulkley, More & Tallmadge, for appellant.

Edward L. England, for appellee; James T. Pales, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
# C_2008128EN.01003101.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/31

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 April 2008 — SIDE v Commission

(Case T-348/04) (1)

1

(State aid - Export aid in the book sector - Failure to give prior notification - Article 87(3)(d) EC - Temporal scope of Community law - Method of calculating the amount of the aid)

(2008/C 128/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Société internationale de diffusion and d'édition SA (SIDE) (Vitry-sur-Seine, France) (represented by: N. Coutrelis and V. Giacobbo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne, Agent)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and S. Ramet initially and, subsequently, by G. de Bergues and A.-L. Vendrolini, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of the last sentence of Article 1 of Commission Decision 2005/262/EC of 20 April 2004 on the aid implemented by France in favour of the Coopérative d'exportation du livre français (CELF) (OJ 2005 L 85, p. 27).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the last sentence of Article 1 of the Commission's Decision of 20 April 2004 on the aid implemented by France in favour of the Coopérative d'exportation du livre français (CELF). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the last sentence of Article 1 of the Commission's Decision of 20 April 2004 on the aid implemented by France in favour of the Coopérative d'exportation du livre français (CELF).

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and those of the Société internationale de diffusion et d'édition SA (SIDE). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and those of the Société internationale de diffusion et d'édition SA (SIDE).

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---
#### STATE v. GOODE

No. 10A94-2

Case below: Johnston County Superior Court

Petition by defendant for writ of supersedeas denied 4 September 1997.