alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Record of Conference Call

DATE: June 8, 2016 EPA ATTENDEES: Guy Donaldson, Dayana Medina, Barbara Nann, Adaobi Nwanko VISITORS: Stuart Spencer (ADEQ), Will Mont gomery (ADEQ), Mark McCorkle (ADEQ), Mark Thimke (Foley & Lardner), Annabeth Reitter (Domtar), Kelley Crouch (Domtar) This meeting was in response to a request from the visitors for an opportunity to have a conference call with EPA to go over the wri tten comments submitted by Domtar during the public comment period on the proposed Arkansas Regional Haze FIP, and to answer any questions from EPA regarding the submitted comments (see Meeting Agenda). Domtar’s written comments are found in the docket for the Arkans as RH FIP rulemaking (Docket ID: EPA–R06– OAR–2015–0189).

The topics discussed included the following:

 Status of EPA’s work on the Arkansas RH FIP, including timing of the final FIP.

 FIP compliance schedule for SO2 and NOx BART for Power Boiler No. 2.

 EPA’s proposed SO2 BART limit for Power Boiler No. 2.

 FIP to SIP process

 Domtar asked for consistency between the Boiler MACT requirement s and the FIP’s PM BART requirements for Power Boiler No. 2.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul M. Anderson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|/S/    PAUL M.
ANDERSON                          
|Paul M. Anderson                                 
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|November 9, 2005
### §195a. Emergency communications interoperability research and development

#### (a) In general

The Under Secretary for Science and Technology, acting through the Director of the Office for Interoperability and Compatibility, shall establish a comprehensive research and development program to support and promote—

(1) the ability of emergency response providers and relevant government officials to continue to communicate in the event of natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters; and

(2) interoperable emergency communications capabilities among emergency response providers and relevant government officials, including by—

(A) supporting research on a competitive basis, including through the Directorate of Science and Technology and Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency; and

(B) considering the establishment of a Center of Excellence under the Department of Homeland Security Centers of Excellence Program focused on improving emergency response providers' communication capabilities.

#### (b) Purposes

The purposes of the program established under subsection (a) include—

(1) supporting research, development, testing, and evaluation on emergency communication capabilities;

(2) understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the public safety communications systems in use;

(3) examining how current and emerging technology can make emergency response providers more effective, and how Federal, State, local, and tribal government agencies can use this technology in a coherent and cost-effective manner;

(4) investigating technologies that could lead to long-term advancements in emergency communications capabilities and supporting research on advanced technologies and potential systemic changes to dramatically improve emergency communications; and

(5) evaluating and validating advanced technology concepts, and facilitating the development and deployment of interoperable emergency communication capabilities.

#### (c) Definitions

For purposes of this section, the term "interoperable", with respect to emergency communications, has the meaning given the term in section 578 of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title III, §315, as added Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §673(a), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1443.)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29146]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Gut Microbiomes in Brain Diseases.
    Date: March 5, 2021.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Joshua Jin-Hyouk Park, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building 2W200, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6208, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#62080d110a17034c1203100956220c0b0a4c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcb6b3afb4a9bdf2acbdaeb7e89cb2b5b4f2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 29, 2020.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-29146 Filed 1-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T


March 27, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Serologicals
Corporation has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP,
the Company's independent public accountants, stating that the December 30, 2001
audit was subject to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate
continuity of Arthur Andersen LLP personnel working on the audit, availability
of national office consultation and availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Arthur Andersen LLP to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Very truly yours,



Serologicals Corporation

/s/ Harold W. Ingalls

Harold W. Ingalls
Vice President Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
23





We
consent to the incorporation by reference and use of our report dated February
17, 2009 on the consolidated financial statements of Rurban Financial Corp. and
Subsidiaries, which appears in Rurban Financial Corp.’s Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008, in Rurban Financial Corp.’s Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (SEC Registration No. 333-150911), filed May 14, 2008, pertaining to
the Rurban Financial Corp. Stock Incentive Plan.




/s/BKD,LLPBKD,
      LLP




Cincinnati,
Ohio


March 19,
2009
### [§§4306 to 4308. Omitted]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 4306 to 4308, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 441, 442, were omitted in the general revision of this chapter by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95–454, §203(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1131.

Section 4306 related to inspection of performance-rating plans.

Section 4307 related to prohibition of other rating procedures.

Section 4308 related to regulations for administration of the chapter, and is covered by revised section 4305.
### §195h. National Urban Security Technology Laboratory

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall designate the laboratory described in subsection (b) as an additional laboratory pursuant to the authority under section 188(c)(2) of this title. Such laboratory shall be used to test and evaluate emerging technologies and conduct research and development to assist emergency response providers in preparing for, and protecting against, threats of terrorism.

#### (b) Laboratory described

The laboratory described in this subsection is the laboratory—

(1) known, as of December 27, 2021, as the National Urban Security Technology Laboratory; and

(2) transferred to the Department pursuant to section 183(1)(E) of this title.

#### (c) Laboratory activities

The National Urban Security Technology Laboratory shall—

(1) conduct tests, evaluations, and assessments of current and emerging technologies, including, as appropriate, the cybersecurity of such technologies that can connect to the internet, for emergency response providers;

(2) act as a technical advisor to emergency response providers; and

(3) carry out other such activities as the Secretary determines appropriate.

#### (d) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section may be construed as affecting in any manner the authorities or responsibilities of the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office of the Department.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title III, §322, as added Pub. L. 117–81, div. F, title LXIV, §6406(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2402.)
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 11216 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. BA LD EM AR SO LI S, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he N or t her n D i st r i c tof Texas U SDC N o . 4 : 0 5 - CR- 8 8 - ALL B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , D AV IS, an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * A p p ea l i n g th e j u d gm en t i n a crim i n a l c a se, B a l d em a r S oli s p rese n ts ar gum ent s t hathe c onc ede s ar e f or ec l os ed by Un i t e dS t a t e s v . B ro wn , 920 F. 2d 1 2 1 2 , 1 2 1 6 -1 7 ( 5 th C ir . 1 9 9 1 ), abrogat e d on ot hergrounds by Uni t e d S t at e s v. Ca n d ia , 454 F . 3d468 , 472 - 73 (5t h C i r. 200 6) , w h i ch h el d that a d istr i ctcourt m a y o rd er a term of i m p ri son m en t t o ru n con secu tive l y w i tha n u n i m p ose dstate United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 11216

2 s e nt e nc e . The a ppe l l ant ’ s m o t i o n f o rs um m ar y di s po s i t i o n i s G RA N T E D , a nd t h e j u d g me n to f

t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 for Hallwood  Energy  Partners,  L.P.and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000768172
<NAME>                        Hallwood Energy Partners, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         11,874
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,518
<PP&E>                                         670,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                 565,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,240
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     62,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,091
<SALES>                                        43,177
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               43,586
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,895)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,895)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.86)
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Carrie Dawson, Respondent, v. North Hudson Woodcraft Corporation et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board for death benefits; the board finding that an accidental blow to the abdomen caused bilateral hernias, for which surgery was inadvisable because of a heart condition; that decedent became and remained disabled until his death more than eight years later following a cerebral hemorrhage of some months before; and that the hernias and their complications were contributory causes of death. Appellants’ medical proof was that death was due solely to the natural progression of decedent’s condition of arteriosclerosis and hypertension terminating in a cerebral vascular accident, but there was medical evidence that the hernia was of inordinate size and uncontrollable and *“*not only contained a large amount of bowel and mesentery but probably a part of the bladder”; that there was constant toxemia due to sluggish elimination of the bowel content and that a severe hemorrhage from the bowel caused a severe systemic shock from which decedent never recovered; that the condition aggravated his hypertension; and that death was hastened by these conditions. This evidence was substantial and the board was entitled to accept it. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.
#### James Sykes et al., Appellants, v RFD Third Avenue I Associates, LLC, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[833 NYS2d 76]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis Crespo, Special Referee), entered January 4, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ application for attorneys’ fees, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, plaintiffs’ application granted, and the matter remanded for a determination of the amount to be awarded.

Plaintiffs purchased a luxury penthouse apartment from defendant RFD Third Avenue I Associates, LLC, for a purchase price of $3.9 million. During the preclosing walk-through, plaintiffs found various deficiencies in the apartment, and a punch list of items to be completed or repaired was provided. Defendant agreed, in writing, to correct these deficiencies, and placed $75,000 in escrow to secure the completion of the work. The escrow agreement provided that if the work was not completed within 30 days, through no fault of the plaintiffs, defendant would pay plaintiffs $500 per day for each subsequent day the work was not completed, and further provided that in the event any legal action was commenced with regard to the escrow funds, “the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its legal fees and disbursements.” The work was not completed within the time frame allotted, and plaintiffs’ demanded the escrow monies. Defendant refused, contending that plaintiffs had frustrated the completion of the work, and litigation ensued.

Ultimately, the parties stipulated to the release of the escrow of $75,000, plus interest, to plaintiffs, and the matter was referred to a special referee for a determination of legal fees and expenses.

We disagree with the Referee’s view that the stipulation releasing the escrow funds to plaintiffs fails to establish that plaintiffs prevailed in this action. To determine whether a party has “prevailed” for the purpose of awarding attorneys’ fees, the court must consider the “true scope” of the dispute litigated and what was achieved within that scope *(see Excelsior 57th Corp. v Winters,*227 AD2d 146 [1996]). To be considered a “prevailing party,” one must simply prevail on the central claims advanced, and receive substantial relief in consequence thereof *(see Board of Mgrs. of 55 Walker St. Condominium v Walker St.,*6 AD3d 279 [2004]).

*280Plaintiffs’ essential legal claim against RED Third Avenue I Associates was their entitlement to the escrow funds, premised on their compliance with their obligations under the agreement, and defendant’s failure to “work diligently and use reasonable good faith efforts to complete” the punch list items as required. Although they received the funds they sought through stipulation rather than through a judicial determination, they sufficiently prevailed on their claim *(see e.g. Matter of Thomasel v Perales, 78*NY2d 561 [1991]). Accordingly, plaintiffs are entitled to recoup their attorneys’ fees, pursuant to the provision of the escrow agreement allowing for fees to the “prevailing party.” Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Marlow, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.
### §202. Border, maritime, and transportation responsibilities

The Secretary shall be responsible for the following:

(1) Preventing the entry of terrorists and the instruments of terrorism into the United States.

(2) Securing the borders, territorial waters, ports, terminals, waterways, and air, land, and sea transportation systems of the United States, including managing and coordinating those functions transferred to the Department at ports of entry.

(3) Carrying out the immigration enforcement functions vested by statute in, or performed by, the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization (or any officer, employee, or component of the Immigration and Naturalization Service) immediately before the date on which the transfer of functions specified under section 251 of this title takes effect.

(4) Establishing and administering rules, in accordance with section 236 of this title, governing the granting of visas or other forms of permission, including parole, to enter the United States to individuals who are not a citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States.

(5) Establishing national immigration enforcement policies and priorities.

(6) Except as provided in part C of this subchapter, administering the customs laws of the United States.

(7) Conducting the inspection and related administrative functions of the Department of Agriculture transferred to the Secretary of Homeland Security under section 231 of this title.

(8) In carrying out the foregoing responsibilities, ensuring the speedy, orderly, and efficient flow of lawful traffic and commerce.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §402, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2177; Pub. L. 114–125, title VIII, §802(g)(1)(B)(ii)(II), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 211.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Part C of this subchapter, referred to in par. (6), was in the original "subtitle C", meaning subtitle C (§421 et seq.) of title IV of Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2182, which enacted part C (§231 et seq.) of this subchapter and amended sections 2279e and 2279f of Title 7, Agriculture, and sections 115, 44901, and 47106 of Title 49, Transportation. For complete classification of subtitle C to the Code, see Tables.

The customs laws of the United States, referred to in par. (6), are classified generally to Title 19, Customs Duties.

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–125 substituted "Border, maritime, and transportation responsibilities" for "Responsibilities" in section catchline and struck out ", acting through the Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security," after "The Secretary" in introductory provisions.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.6.1

                                September 9, 1999

Serologicals Corporation
780 Park North Boulevard, Suite 110
Clarkston, Georgia 30021
Attention: Board of Directors


To the Board of Directors:

         Effective as of the date hereof, I am hereby resigning all positions as
officer and/or director which I hold with Serologicals Corporation (the
"Company") and all subsidiaries of the Company. By executing below, we mutually
agree that the Company shall (a) reimburse me for up to $10,000 for
out-placement expenses incurred by me in connection with an employment search
and (b) compensate me and provide me benefits as if I were terminated by the
Company pursuant to Section 6(d)(2) of the Employment Agreement by and between
the Company and me, dated as of March 8, 1993, and as amended on December 28,
1994 (the "Employment Agreement"). We mutually acknowledge and agree that the
terms of the following written agreements by and between the Company and me
remain in effect: (i) the Employment Agreement (except that the words "after the
termination of this Agreement" in the first paragraph of Section 8 of the
Employment Agreement shall be interpreted to mean "after the termination of his
Employment"), (ii) the Indemnification Agreement, dated as of May 9, 1995, by
and between the Company and me, and (iii) the stock option agreements by and
between the Company and me (and for the purposes of each such stock option
agreement this resignation shall be considered a termination without cause).

         Upon your signature and return of this Letter Agreement, this Letter
Agreement will be effective, enforceable and irrevocable.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   /s/ Harold J. Tenoso
                                   ---------------------------------
                                   Harold J. Tenoso

Agreed to and Accepted
as of the date hereof:

By: /s/ Lawrence E. Tilton
    ------------------------
Name:   Lawrence E. Tilton
Title:  Director

By: /s/ Matthew C. Weisman
    ------------------------
Name:   Matthew C. Weisman
Title:  Director