alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph Miller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GPS Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  November 19, 2007

/s/   JOSEPH MILLER
      -----------------------
Name: Joseph Miller
Its:  Chief Financial Officer
#### WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. SYRACUSE, L. & B. RY., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 13, 1903.)

Action by Jenet C. Williams, an infant, by guardian, etc., against the Syracuse, Lakeside & Baldwinsville Railway.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs and disbursements. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the WICOR,
Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements and the related footnotes.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      387,616
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     75,452
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         386,581
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       240,274
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,089,923
<COMMON>                                        37,819
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      225,638
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            181,376
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 433,666
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           205,444
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               9,923
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      160,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 100,934
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   11,017
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 328,939
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,089,923
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,010,113
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            33,977
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     904,159
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     938,136
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         71,977
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (1,589)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  70,388
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        16,555
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,833
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   53,833
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        33,394
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          639
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          94,798
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42


</TABLE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Collective Bargaining in Paper and Allied Products Industry

              																	Frutkin, Arnold W. (Arnold Wolfe). 						*Collective Bargaining in Paper and Allied Products Industry : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 709*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1942,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4208,			accessed on September 17, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Schedule to Exhibit 10.6


     One executive's employment agreement differs from the form of
agreement attached as Exhibit 10.6 in the following respects:

     1.   Section 5(b) of such agreement reads as follows:

  (b)  Employee's employment may be terminated by the Company Without Cause
     (as  hereinafter defined) at any time, effective upon  the  giving  to
     Employee  of  a  written notice of termination  specifying  that  such
     termination is Without Cause, provided that if such termination is  to
     be  effective before April 1, 1998, the Company's notice  to  Employee
     must  be  given  not less than sixty (60) days prior to the  effective
     date of such termination.
     
     2.   Section 6 of such agreement contains the following provision:

  Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Section 6, if Employee gives
     the  Company  at  least ten (10) days prior written notice  that  such
     termination  is  to  be  effective on  April  1,  1998,  whether  such
     termination  is  for Good Reason or for other than Good  Reason,  then
     Employee  shall be entitled to the payments and benefits specified  in
     subparagraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of Section 7.
### SUBCHAPTER XII–A—TRANSPORTATION SECURITY
CITYCOUNCIL Geoff Dale - Mayor MarkGran - Mayor Pro - rem DougCox -Council Member Rick Breland -Council Member Retty Sampson

- COt)n(iI Merr'ther ClTYCUHK Df'bra Jackson CITY TREASUREH

StacC'y(ox November4, 2010 Dennis DeVanny Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Office ofAviation Analysis 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 INCORPORATED 1904

Subject: Docket OST-2008-0299 - EAS at EI Centro/Imperial, California Dear Mr. DeVanny: CITY HAll 420 South Imperial Avenue Imperial,California92251 City Hall (760) 355-4371

f'ilx (760) 355-4718

(lTY ATTOHNfY Dennis Morita Dennis fLMoritaAPC.

Ul

On behalf of myself and the City Council ofthe City of Imperial, I would like to take this time to thank you for the opportunity to provide comments regarding the EI Centro/Imperial, California Essential Airline Service proposal. Furthermore, I would also like to thank you for the two time extensions granted byyouroffice while we reviewed the best option forthe constituents ofmy community. At our Regular meeting of November 3, 2010, this City Council voted 3-1 to request that the carrierselection decision that you issue goes to Seaport. Comments by Council expressed a preference to this airline due to greater responsiveness in flight scheduling requests, less expensive airfares, the opportunity for local community involvement and support, willingness to station aircraft locally and betteropportunityto meetthe needs ofour region. The City Council ofthe City of Imperial values the air service at the Imperial County Airport and supports Seaport Airlines. The City of Imperial waives the assurances of a 15 passenger twin engine aircraft for purposes ofthistwo yearcontract period to allow foroperation ofSeaport Airlines during this time. Thank you again for the opportunity to provide comments. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me or City Manager Marlene Best at (760) 355-4373.

# ~2-- Geoff Dale Mayor, City of Imperial
Appeal No. 76-243.

#### Stanley Puc *et al. v.*Leaseway of New England *et al.*

*Keough, Parker & Gearon, Joseph A. Keough,*for plaintiffs.

*Higgins, Cavanagh & Cooney, Kenneth P. Borden,*for defendants.

The plaintiffs’ motion to supplement the record by adding thereto the decision of the trial justice is granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.36

                EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL PLANNING AND SERVICES PROGRAM

    (excerpt from letter from John Chen, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
       President to all Section 16 officers dated as of February 10, 2003)

I am also excited to announce a new Executive Financial Planning and Services
Program for our Section 16 officers that will reimburse you for up to $10,000 of
fees paid by you to a third party in 2003 for tax preparation, insurance
planning, investment planning, retirement planning and/or estate planning
services undertaken on your behalf. You may select your own provider for these
services. Alternatively, for most of these services, you may use KPMG with whom
we have negotiated reduced rates. If you choose to use KPMG, you are free to use
them for some of the services, while retaining different providers for other
services.

The amount of the reimbursement paid to you will be grossed up for federal and
state income tax purposes. To the extent that you do not fully utilize the
allowable reimbursement amount during 2003, you will not be entitled to any cash
payment of the balance nor will you be able to utilize it in subsequent years.

You will need to provide detailed invoices from the third party provider showing
the specific services rendered in order to obtain reimbursement. You need to
submit the invoices to the Vice President of Worldwide Human Resources for
processing.

In selecting your provider(s), it is important to do so in a manner that is
consistent with the philosophy of our Conflict of Interest Policy. Therefore,
you should not retain (1) a family member or other party with whom you have a
significant relationship, or (2) a close business associate of such a person. As
noted in the Conflict of Interest Policy, examples of "significant
relationships" that extend beyond family include domestic partners, dating
relationships, and business partnerships.

Note that KPMG is not able to finalize estate planning documents. Should you
want such services, you will need to retain your own attorney. The HR Department
does have a list of estate planning attorneys who have been recommended to the
HR Department by various people. If you would like to review such list, you can
contact Nita White-Ivy. However. Sybase has NOT undertaken a review of the
qualifications of the attorneys on this list and does NOT endorse or recommend
any particular attorney(s). You should do your own due diligence when selecting
an attorney.
### §9807. Pay authority for critical positions

(a) In this section, the term "position" means—

(1) a position to which chapter 51 applies, including a position in the Senior Executive Service;

(2) a position under the Executive Schedule under sections 5312 through 5317;

(3) a position established under section 3104; or

(4) a senior-level position to which section 5376(a)(1) applies.

(b) Authority under this section—

(1) may be exercised only with respect to a position that—

(A) is described as addressing a critical need in the workforce plan under section 9802(b)(2)(A); and

(B) requires expertise of an extremely high level in a scientific, technical, professional, or administrative field;

(2) may be exercised only to the extent necessary to recruit or retain an individual exceptionally well qualified for the position; and

(3) may be exercised only in retaining employees of the Administration or in appointing individuals who were not employees of another Federal agency as defined under section 5102(a)(1).

(c)(1) Notwithstanding section 5377, the Administrator may fix the rate of basic pay for a position in the Administration in accordance with this section. The Administrator may not delegate this authority.

(2) The number of positions with pay fixed under this section may not exceed 10 at any time.

(d)(1) The rate of basic pay fixed under this section may not be less than the rate of basic pay (including any comparability payments) which would otherwise be payable for the position involved if this section had never been enacted.

(2) The annual rate of basic pay fixed under this section may not exceed the per annum rate of salary payable under section 104 of title 3.

(3) Notwithstanding any provision of section 5307, in the case of an employee who, during any calendar year, is receiving pay at a rate fixed under this section, no allowance, differential, bonus, award, or similar cash payment may be paid to such employee if, or to the extent that, when added to basic pay paid or payable to such employee (for service performed in such calendar year as an employee in the executive branch or as an employee outside the executive branch to whom chapter 51 applies), such payment would cause the total to exceed the per annum rate of salary which, as of the end of such calendar year, is payable under section 104 of title 3.

(Added Pub. L. 108–201, §3(a), Feb. 24, 2004, 118 Stat. 467.)
### §1140. Threat assessments

Not later than 1 year after August 3, 2007, the Secretary shall complete a name-based security background check against the consolidated terrorist watchlist and an immigration status check for all public transportation frontline employees, similar to the threat assessment screening program required for facility employees and longshoremen by the Commandant of the Coast Guard under Coast Guard Notice USCG–2006–24189 (71 Fed. Reg. 25066 (April 8, 2006)).

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XIV, §1411, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 413.)
#### CRISP v. CRISP

No. 323A97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 625

Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 2 October.
#### DONALD L. SMITH, HAROLD D. COLEY, JR., D. REID COTTRELL, AND E. MICHAEL LATTA, AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, AND MURIEL OFFERMAN, SECRETARY OF REVENUE

61A98

(Filed 18 February 1998)

ORDER

On initiative of this Court pursuant to G.S. 7A-31(a) and Rule 15(e)(2) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> Discretionary review prior to a determination by the Court of Appeals is allowed *ex mero motu.*The record on appeal, all exhibits, and other documents in this case shall be certified to this Court by the Court of Appeals.

> The case shall be docketed in this Court as of the date of this order’s certification. Parties who have already submitted briefs to the Court of Appeals may elect to rebrief their case for the Supreme Court so long as their new briefs are filed in accordance with Appellate Rule 13(a)(1).

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 18th day of February, 1998.

Lake, J.

For the Court
### **CHAPTER 101—FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY PERSONNEL**

Sec.
10101.
Definitions.
10102.
Strategic human capital plan.
10103.
Career paths.
10104.
Recruitment bonuses.
10105.
Retention bonuses.
10106.
Quarterly report on vacancy rate in employee positions.
### NUMBER 13

- 1 8

- 00 657

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

EX PARTE WILLIAM TRAYLOR MASS EY

On a ppeal from the 377 th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Justices Benavides

, Longoria , and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Appell ee ’ s counsel, Constance Filley Johnson , has filed a motion to withdraw as

counsel. We GRANT said motion. Pursuant to Rule 6.5(c) of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, counsel is directed to notify ap pell ee , in writing, of any previously

undisclosed deadlines and file a copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court.

Appell ee is directed to notify the Court promptly if he retains new counsel on appeal

by filing a notice including that attorney ’ s name, mailing address, email address,

telephone number, facsimile number, and State Bar of Texas identification number. See2

generall y T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 6. In the interim, the Court expects this appeal to proceed as

per the appellate rules. Appell ee is expected to comply with all applicable deadlines and

filings should comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It is so ORDER ED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e

5 th day of March , 20 1 9

.
<PAGE>   1
                              EAC INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                For The Three Months                 For The Six Months
                                                   Ended July 31,                       Ended July 31,
                                               1997              1996              1997              1996
                                               ----              ----              ----              ----
<S>                                        <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
NET (LOSS)                                 $   (65,988)      $   (75,977)      $   (48,041)      $   (91,309)
                                           ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========


SHARES:
  Weighted average shares outstanding        2,311,687         2,311,687         2,311,687         2,311,687
  Other - options, warrants etc                     --                --                --                --
                                           -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------
                                             2,311,687         2,311,687         2,311,687         2,311,687
                                           ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========

PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE          $      (.03)      $      (.03)      $      (.02)      $      (.04)
                                           ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
</TABLE>

                                 - Exhibit 11 -

                                                                        Page 13.
```

[Federal Register: January 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 14)]
[Notices]               
[Page 3720]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22ja10-38]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
Office of Environmental Management; Environmental Management 
Advisory Board Charter Renewal

    Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and in accordance with Title 41 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), and following consultation 
with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services 
Administration, notice is hereby given that the Environmental 
Management Advisory Board will be renewed for a two-year period 
beginning January 23, 2010.
    The Board provides the Assistant Secretary for Environmental 
Management (EM) with information and strategic advice on a broad range 
of corporate issues affecting the EM program. These corporate issues 
include, but are not limited to, project management and oversight 
activities, cost/benefit analyses, program performance, human capital 
development, and contracts and acquisition strategies. Recommendations 
to the Department of Energy (DOE) on the programmatic resolution of 
numerous difficult issues will help achieve DOE's objective of the safe 
and efficient cleanup of its contaminated sites.
    Additionally, the renewal of the Environmental Management Advisory 
Board has been determined to be essential to conduct DOE's business and 
to be in the public interest in connection with the performance of 
duties imposed on DOE by law and agreement. The Board will operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
and rules and regulations issued in implementation of that Act.
    Further information regarding this Advisory Board may be obtained 
from Ms. Terri Lamb, Designated Federal Officer, at (202) 586-9007.

    Issued in Washington, DC on January 19, 2010.
Carol A. Matthews,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-1208 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### RIOLA, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November, 1904.)

Action by Gaetano Rióla against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. See Riola v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 98 App. Div. 633, 92 N. Y. Supp. 1143.