Mojave Desert 

Air Quality Management District 

Final 

Staff Report 

Rescission of 

Rule 203.1 – Special Permit Provisions 

Rule 203.2 – Eligibility of Compensatory Emission 

Reductions 

Rule 213 – Standards for Permits to Construct: 

 Air Quality Impact

Rule 213.1 – Standards for Permits to Operate: 

 Air Quality Impact

Rule 213.2 – Definitions for RULES 213, 213.1, and 

213.3 

Rule 213.3 – Additional Standards for Permits to 

Construct And Operate 

Adopted on 

April 28, 2008 

14306 PARK AVE, VICTORVILLE, CA 92392-2310 

PHONE: (760) 245-1661 

FAX: (760) 245-2699 
This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 TC-1

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3

I. PURPOSE OF STAFF REPORT ............................................................................................ 1 

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 1 

III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ............................................................................................. 1 

IV. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST ............................................................................ 2 

V. DISCUSSION OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS..................................................................... 3 

A. REQUIRED ELEMENTS/FINDINGS............................................................................... 3 

1. State Findings Required for Adoption of Rules & Regulations ..................................... 3 

a. Necessity..................................................................................................................... 3 

b. Authority..................................................................................................................... 3 

c. Clarity ......................................................................................................................... 3 

d. Consistency................................................................................................................. 3 

e. Non-duplication .......................................................................................................... 3 

f. Reference .................................................................................................................... 4 

g. Public Notice & Comment, Public Hearing................................................................ 4 

2. Federal Elements (SIP Submittals, Other Federal Submittals)....................................... 4 

a. Satisfaction of Underlying Federal Requirements...................................................... 4 

b. Public Notice and Comment ....................................................................................... 4 

c. Availability of Document ........................................................................................... 5 

d. Notice to Specified Entities ........................................................................................ 5 

e. Public Hearing ............................................................................................................ 5 

f. Legal Authority to Adopt and Implement................................................................... 5 

g. Applicable State Laws and Regulations Were Followed............................................ 5 

B. WRITTEN ANALYSIS OF EXISTING REQUIREMENTS ............................................ 5 

C. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 6 

1. General............................................................................................................................ 6 

2. Incremental Cost Effectiveness....................................................................................... 6 

D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (CEQA)....................................................................... 6 

E. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS..................................................... 6 

1. Potential Environmental Impacts.................................................................................... 6 

2. Mitigation of Impacts...................................................................................................... 7

3. Alternative Methods of Compliance............................................................................... 7 

F. PUBLIC REVIEW.............................................................................................................. 7

VI. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION ................................................................................................ 7 

A. SOURCE DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................. 7 

B. EMISSIONS ....................................................................................................................... 7 

C. CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.......................................................................................... 7 

D. PROPOSED RULE SUMMARY....................................................................................... 8 

E. SIP HISTORY .................................................................................................................... 8 

1. SIP History..................................................................................................................... 8 

a. SIP in the San Bernardino County Portion of MDAQMD ......................................... 8 

b. SIP in the Riverside County Portion of the MDAQMD............................................. 8 
TC-2 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08

2. SIP Analysis.................................................................................................................... 9 

Appendix A - Iterated Version.................................................................................................... A-1 

Appendix B - Public Notice Documents..................................................................................... B-1 

Appendix C - Public Comments and Responses......................................................................... C-1 

Appendix D - California Environmental Quality Act Documentation ....................................... D-1 

Appendix E - Bibliography..........................................................................................................E-1 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 1

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3

I. PURPOSE OF STAFF REPORT 

A staff report serves several discrete purposes. Its primary purpose is to provide a summary and 

background material to the members of the Governing Board. This allows the members of the 

Governing Board to be fully informed before making any required decision. It also provides the 

documentation necessary for the Governing Board to make any findings, which are required by 

law to be made prior to the approval or adoption of a document. In addition, a staff report 

ensures that the correct procedures and proper documentation for approval or adoption of a 

document have been performed. Finally, the staff report provides evidence for defense against 

legal challenges regarding the propriety of the approval or adoption of the document. 

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

The Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) has the authority pursuant to 

California Health and Safety Code (H & S Code) §40702 to adopt, amend or repeal rules and 

regulations. Regulation II – Permits, specifically: Rule 203.1 – Special Permit Provisions; Rule 

203.2 – Eligibility of Compensatory Emission Reductions; Rule 213 – Standards for Permits to 

Construct: Air Quality Impact; Rule 213.1 – Standards for Permits to Operate: Air Quality 

Impact; Rule 213.2 – Definitions for RULES 213, 213.1, and 213.3; and Rule 213.3 – Additional 

Standards for Permits to Construct and Operate are proposed for rescission because these rules 

were superceded by the terms of Regulation XIII as adopted 7/21/80 and its subsequent 

incorporation into the State Implementation Plan (47 FR 25013, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(87)(iv)). 

Despite their inapplicability these rules were never officially rescinded from the MDAQMD 

rulebook. This is a procedural action to remove superceded rules from the MDAQMD rulebook. 

This action will clarify the rulebook and avoid confusion with Regulation XIII – New Source 

Review. Please note, Regulation XIII was most recently amended and SIP approved in 1996. 

The current version of Regulation XIII in the SIP is 03/25/96 (61 FR 58133; 40 CFR 

52.220(c)(239)(i)(A)(1)). 

III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 

Staff recommends that the Governing Board of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management 

District (District) rescind Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 and approve the 

appropriate CEQA documentation. This action is necessary to remove superceded rules from the 

MDAQMD rulebook. 

The Governing Board of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District rescinded Rule 

203.1 – Special Permit Provisions; Rule 203.2 – Eligibility of Compensatory Emission 

Reductions; Rule 213 – Standards for Permits to Construct: Air Quality Impact; Rule 213.1 – 

Standards for Permits to Operate: Air Quality Impact; Rule 213.2 – Definitions for RULES 213, 

213.1, and 213.3; and Rule 213.3 – Additional Standards for Permits to Construct and Operate 

on April 28, 2008. 
2 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

IV. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST 

The findings and analysis as indicated below are required for the procedurally correct rescission 

of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3. Each item is discussed, if applicable, in 

Section V. Copies of related documents are included in the appropriate appendices. 

FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR 

RULES & REGULATIONS:

 X Necessity 

 X Authority 

 X Clarity 

 X Consistency 

 X Non-duplication 

 X Reference 

 X Public Notice & Comment 

 X Public Hearing 

REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE 

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 

SUBMISSION (SIP): 

 X Public Notice & Comment 

 X Availability of Document 

 X Notice to Specified Entities (State, Air 

Districts, USEPA, Other States) 

 X Public Hearing 

 X Legal Authority to adopt and implement the 

document. 

 X Applicable State laws and regulations were 

followed. 

ELEMENTS OF A FEDERAL 

SUBMISSION:

 X Elements as set forth in applicable Federal 

law or regulations. 

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

ACT REQUIREMENTS (CEQA):

N/A Ministerial Action 

 X Exemption 

 N/A Negative Declaration 

N/A Environmental Impact Report 

 X Appropriate findings, if necessary. 

 X Public Notice & Comment 

SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL 

ANALYSIS (RULES & REGULATIONS ONLY):

 X Environmental impacts of compliance. 

N/A Mitigation of impacts. 

N/A Alternative methods of compliance. 

OTHER: 

 N/A Written analysis of existing air pollution 

control requirements 

 N/A Economic Analysis 

 X Public Review
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 3

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

V. DISCUSSION OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 

A. REQUIRED ELEMENTS/FINDINGS 

This section discusses the State of California statutory requirements that apply to the 

rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3. These are actions that 

need to be performed and/or information that must be provided in order to rescind the 

rules in a procedurally correct manner. 

1. State Findings Required for Adoption of Rules & Regulations: 

Before adopting, amending, or repealing a rule or regulation, the District 

Governing Board is required to make findings of necessity, authority, clarity, 

consistency, non-duplication, and reference based upon relevant information 

presented at the hearing. The information below is provided to assist the Board in 

making these findings. 

a. Necessity: 

The rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

is necessary to remove superceded rules from the MDAQMD 

rulebook. 

b. Authority: 

The District has the authority pursuant to California Health and 

Safety Code (H & S Code) §40702 to adopt, amend or repeal rules 

and regulations. 

c. Clarity: 

The rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

is clear in that they are written so that the persons subject to the 

rule can easily understand the meaning. 

d. Consistency: 

The rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

is in harmony with, and not in conflict with or contradictory to any 

state law or regulation, federal law or regulation, or court 

decisions. 

e. Non-duplication: 

The rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

does not impose the same requirements as any existing state or 
4 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

federal law or regulation because the rescission removes 

superceded rules from the MDAQMD rulebook. 

f. Reference: 

The District has the authority pursuant to H & S Code §40702 to 

adopt, amend or repeal rules and regulations. 

g. Public Notice & Comment, Public Hearing: 

Notice for the public hearing for the proposed rescission of Rules 

203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 was published 03/28/08. 

See Appendix “B” for a copy of the public notice. See Appendix 

“C” for copies of comments, if any, and District responses. 

2. Federal Elements (SIP Submittals, Other Federal Submittals). 

Submittals to USEPA are required to include various elements depending upon 

the type of document submitted and the underlying federal law that requires the 

submittal. The information below indicates which elements were required for the 

rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 and how they were 

satisfied. 

a. Satisfaction of Underlying Federal Requirements: 

Submittals to the United States Environmental Protection Agency 

(USEPA) are required to include various elements depending upon 

the type of document submitted and the underlying federal law that 

requires the submittal. 

Submission to USEPA is not required for the rescission of Rules 

203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 because these rules 

were superceded by Regulation XIII and are therefore not in the 

SIP. However, the MDAQMD plans to officially notify USEPA of 

this rescission and to follow SIP submission related procedures to 

avoid confusion regarding the SIP status of these rules in the 

future. 

b. Public Notice and Comment: 

Notice for the public hearing for the proposed rescission of Rules 

203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 was published 03/28/08. 

See Appendix “B” for a copy of the public notice. See Appendix 

“C” for copies of comments, if any, and District responses. 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 5

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

c. Availability of Document: 

Copies of the proposed rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 

213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 and the accompanying draft staff report 

were made available to the public on 03/19/08. 

d. Notice to Specified Entities: 

Copies of the proposed rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 

213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 and the accompanying draft staff report 

will be sent to all affected agencies. The proposed rescission was 

sent to CARB and USEPA on 03/19/08. 

e. Public Hearing: 

A public hearing to consider the proposed rescission of Rules 

203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 was conducted on 

04/28/08. 

f. Legal Authority to Adopt and Implement: 

The District has the authority pursuant to H&S Code §40702 to 

adopt, amend, or repeal rules and regulations and to do such acts as 

may be necessary or proper to execute the duties imposed upon the 

District. 

g. Applicable State Laws and Regulations Were Followed: 

Public notice and hearing procedures pursuant to H&S Code 

§§40725-40728 have been followed. See Section (V)(A)(1) above 

for compliance with state findings required pursuant to H&S Code 

§40727. See Section (V)(B) below for compliance with the 

required analysis of existing requirements pursuant to H&S Code 

§40727.2. See Section (V)(C) for compliance with economic 

analysis requirements pursuant to H&S Code §40920.6. See 

Section (V)(D) below for compliance with provisions of the 

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 

B. WRITTEN ANALYSIS OF EXISTING REQUIREMENTS 

H & S Code §40727.2 requires air districts to prepare a written analysis of all existing 

federal air pollution control requirements that apply to the same equipment or source type 

as the rule proposed for modification by the district. Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 

213.2, and 213.3 were rescinded because these rules were superceded by the terms of 

Regulation XIII as adopted 7/21/80 and its subsequent incorporation into the State 

Implementation Plan (47 FR 25013, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(87)(iv)). Regulation XIII was 

most recently amended and SIP approved in 1996. The current version of Regulation 

XIII in the SIP is 03/25/96 (61 FR 58133; 40 CFR 52.220(c)(239)(i)(A)(1)). Despite 
6 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

their inapplicability these rules were never officially rescinded from the MDAQMD 

rulebook. This is a procedural action to remove superceded rules from the MDAQMD 

rulebook. This action will clarify the rulebook and avoid confusion with Regulation XIII 

– New Source Review. Therefore the preparation of a written analysis of existing 

pollution control requirements that apply to the same equipment or source type is not 

required.

C. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 

1. General 

No economic impacts are anticipated from the rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 

213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3. This is a procedural action to remove superceded 

rules from the MDAQMD rulebook 

2. Incremental Cost Effectiveness 

Pursuant to H&S Code §40920.6, incremental cost effectiveness calculations are 

required for rules and regulations which are adopted or amended to meet the 

California Clean Air Act requirements for Best Available Retrofit Control 

Technology (BARCT) or “all feasible measures” to control volatile compounds, 

oxides of nitrogen or oxides of sulfur. The rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 

213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 were not subject to incremental cost effectiveness 

calculations because these rules did not impose BARCT or “all feasible 

measures”.

D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (CEQA) 

Through the process described below the appropriate CEQA process for the rescission of 

Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 was determined. 

1. The rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 meets 

the CEQA definition of “project”. They are not “ministerial” actions. 

2. The rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 causes 

no change in emissions. This action simply rescinds a set of rules that were 

superceded by the terms of Regulation XIII. Despite their inapplicability these 

rules were never officially rescinded from the MDAQMD rulebook. This is a 

procedural action to remove superceded rules from the MDAQMD rulebook. 

Copies of the documents relating to CEQA can be found in Appendix “D”. 

E. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 

1. Potential Environmental Impacts 

There are no potential environmental impacts of compliance with the rescission of 

Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3. These rules are pre-1990 

Amendments to the Federal Clean Air Act New Source Review Rules that were 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 7

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

superceded by the terms of Regulation XIII as adopted 7/21/80 and its subsequent 

incorporation into the State Implementation Plan (47 FR 25013, 40 CFR 

52.220(c)(87)(iv)). Despite their inapplicability these rules were never officially 

rescinded from the MDAQMD rulebook. This is a procedural action to remove 

superceded rules from the MDAQMD rulebook. This action will clarify the 

rulebook and avoid confusion with Regulation XIII – New Source Review. Please 

note, Regulation XIII was most recently amended and SIP approved in 1996. The 

current version of Regulation XIII in the SIP is 03/25/96 (61 FR 58133; 40 CFR 

52.220(c)(239)(i)(A)(1)).

2. Mitigation of Impacts 

N/A 

3. Alternative Methods of Compliance 

N/A 

F. PUBLIC REVIEW 

See Staff Report Section (V)(A)(1)(g) and (2)(b), as well as Appendix “B” 

VI. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION 

A. SOURCE DESCRIPTION 

Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 were pre-1990 Amendments to the 

Federal Clean Air Act New Source Review Rules that were superceded by the terms of 

Regulation XIII – New Source Review, as adopted 7/21/80 and its subsequent 

incorporation into the State Implementation Plan (47 FR 25013, 40 CFR 

52.220(c)(87)(iv)). Regulation XIII was most recently amended and SIP approved in 

1996. The current version of Regulation XIII in the SIP is 03/25/96 (61 FR 58133; 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(239)(i)(A)(1)).

B. EMISSIONS 

The rescission will yield no change in emissions because all of the provisions of Rules 

203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 are currently enforced by the terms of 

Regulation XIII – New Source Review, as adopted 7/21/80 and its subsequent 

incorporation into the State Implementation Plan (47 FR 25013, 40 CFR 

52.220(c)(87)(iv)). Regulation XIII was most recently amended and SIP approved in 

1996. The current version of Regulation XIII in the SIP is 03/25/96 (61 FR 58133; 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(239)(i)(A)(1)). 

C. CONTROL REQUIREMENTS 

The rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 does not change 

control requirements. The rescission removes rules that were superceded by the terms of 
8 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

Regulation XIII – New Source Review, as adopted 7/21/80. Regulation XIII was most 

recently amended and SIP approved in 1996. The current version of Regulation XIII in 

the SIP is 03/25/96 (61 FR 58133; 40 CFR 52.220(c)(239)(i)(A)(1)).

D. PROPOSED RULE SUMMARY 

This section gives a brief overview of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3. 

Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 were pre-1990 Amendments to the 

Federal Clean Air Act New Source Review Rules that were superceded by the terms of 

Regulation XIII as adopted 7/21/80. 

E. SIP HISTORY 

1. SIP History. 

a. SIP in the San Bernardino County Portion of MDAQMD 

Submission to USEPA is not required for the rescission of Rules 

203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3. These rules were 

superseded by the terms of Rule 1301(c) approved at 40 CFR 

52.220(c)(87)(iv) - 06/09/82 47 FR 25013. 

b. SIP in the Riverside County (Blythe/Palo Verde Valley) Portion of 

the MDAQMD 

One of the provisions of the legislations which created the 

MDAQMD allowed areas contiguous to the MDAQMD 

boundaries and within the same air basin to leave their current air 

district and become a part of the MDAQMD. On 07/01/94 the area 

commonly known as the Palo Verde Valley in Riverside County, 

including the City of Blythe, left South Coast Air Quality 

Management District (SCAQMD) and joined the MDAQMD. 

Since USEPA adopts SIP revisions in California as effective 

within the jurisdictional boundaries of local air districts, when the 

local boundaries change the SIP as approved by USEPA for that 

area up to the date of the change remains as the SIP in that 

particular area. Upon annexation of the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley 

the MDAQMD acquired the SIP prior to 07/01/94 that was 

effective in the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley. Therefore, the SIP 

history for the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley Portion of the MDAQMD 

is based upon the rules adopted and approved for that portion of 

Riverside County by SCAQMD. 

Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 were rescinded 

by the SCAQMD Board on 06/28/90 in accordance with their 

adoption of SCAQMD Regulation XIII. The rescission of these 

SCAQMD rules and the submission for removal from the SIP 

occurred prior to the annexation of the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley. 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 9

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

The USEPA took action and removed Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2 

from the SIP on 05/13/99 at 64 FR 25828. USEPA stated in at this 

time that Rules 203.1 and 203.2 were not part of the SIP and took 

no action. It does not appear that any action was taken on Rule 

213.3. The actions by USEPA occurred after the annexation of the 

Blythe/Palo Verde Valley into the MDAQMD. 

2. SIP Analysis. 

Submission to USEPA is not required for the rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 

213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 because these rules were superceded by Regulation 

XIII. However, the MDAQMD plans to officially notify USEPA of this 

rescission and to follow SIP submission related procedures to avoid confusion 

regarding the SIP status of these rules in the future. 

The District will request that CARB submit the rescission of Rules 203.1, 203.2, 

213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 to the SIP versions in effect in the Blythe/Palo Verde 

Valley portion of Riverside County. This submission is necessary to ensure that 

these rules were properly removed from the SIP in effect in the Blythe/Palo Verde 

Valley portion of Riverside County. 
10 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 A-1

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

Appendix “A”

Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 Iterated Version 

The iterated version is provided so that the changes to an existing rule may be easily found. The 

manner of differentiating text is as follows: 

1. Underlined text identifies new or revised language. 

2. Lined out text identifies language which is being deleted. 

3. Normal text identifies the current language of the rule which will remain unchanged by 

the adoption of the proposed amendments. 

4. [Bracketed italicized text] is explanatory material that is not part of the proposed 

language. It is removed once the proposed amendments are adopted. 
A-2 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

This page intentionally left blank. 
(Adopted: 01/07/77; CARB Ex. Ord. G-73: 02/01/77; 

Readopted: 07/25/77; Superceded by Regulation XIII as 

adopted: 07/21/80; Rescinded: mm/dd/yy)

MDAQMD Rule 203.1 203.1-1

Special Permit Provisions, d1 03/13/08 

RULE 203.1 

Special Permit Provisions

Any person operating basic equipment under permit pursuant to Rule 203 and who plans to make 

modifications to that equipment or related control equipment, or to install additional control 

equipment, for the purpose of effecting emission reductions under the provisions of Rule 213 (e) 

(2) or Rule 213 (e) (3), shall submit applications for new permits to construct or operate both the 

basic and control equipment involved in such reductions, regardless of whether modifications or 

additions are to be made either to the basic or control equipment, or both.

Existing permits to operate pertaining to the basic and control equipment as specified above shall 

be surrendered and canceled at the time such new permits to construct or operate are issued. 

Such new permits shall not be effective unless surrender of such existing permits has been made. 

If such new permits are denied, such existing permits surrendered pursuant to this section shall 

be reissued and restored.

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall impose those written conditions on such new permits 

specifying emission limits or other conditions which the Air Pollution Control Officer deems 

necessary to insure that the reductions considered for the purpose of Rule 213 (e) (2) or Rule 213 

(e) (3) are made.

[SIP: Not SIP; Superceded by approval of Reg. XIII as adopted 8/21/80, 6/9/82 47 FR 25013, 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(87)(iv); approved 11/9/78, 43 FR 52237, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(39(ii)(B) and 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(31)(vi)(C)] 
203.1-2 MDAQMD Rule 203.1 

Special Permit Provisions, d1 03/13/08 

This page intentionally left blank.
(Adopted: 02/20/79; Superceded by Regulation XIII as adopted: 

07/21/80; Rescinded: mm/dd/yy) 

MDAQMD Rule 203.2 203.2-1

Eligibility of Compensatory Emission Reductions, d1 03/13/08 

RULE 203.2

Eligibility of Compensatory

Emission Reductions

In evaluating applications under Rules 203.1 and 213, the Air Pollution Control Officer shall:

(a) Consider compensatory emission reductions only after applications have been 

submitted in accordance with Rule 203.1 and such applications are substantially 

complete in accordance with Rule 210.

(b) Not consider compensatory emission reductions if before the applications are 

substantially complete, a public hearing is set to consider adopting rules which 

would require the same emission reductions from the same equipment type as 

those proposed by the applicant. In the event that such rules are not adopted or 

are adopted only in part, the control technology not adopted will no longer be 

ineligible for compensatory emission reductions.

(c) Notify the applicant in writing when applications reviewed under Rule 203.1 and 

213 are considered substantially complete.

The provisions of this rule shall apply to applications received on or after date this rule is 

adopted.

[SIP: Not SIP; Superceded by approval of Reg. XIII as adopted 7/21/80, 6/9/82, 47 FR 25013, 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(87)(iv)] 
203.2-2 MDAQMD Rule 203.2 

Eligibility of Compensatory Emission Reductions, d1 03/13/08 

This page intentionally left blank.
(Adopted: 01/07/77; CARB Ex. Ord. G-73: 02/01/77; Readopted: 

07/25/77; Amended: 06/18/79; Superceded by Regulation XIII as 

Adopted: 07/21/80; Rescinded: mm/dd/yy)

MDAQMD Rule 213 213-1

Standards for Permits to Construct: Air Quality Impact, d1 03/13/08 

RULE 213

Standards for Permits to Construct

Air Quality Impact

(a) General: 

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall deny a permit to construct for any unit or units of 

a stationary source that fail to meet the applicable requirements of subsection (b) or (c) of 

this Rule.

(b) Best Available Control Technology:

(1) New Stationary Sources:

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall deny a permit to construct for any unit or 

units constituting a new stationary source if such source will emit more than 250 

pounds per day of nitrogen oxides, organic gases, or any contaminant for which 

there is a national ambient air quality standard (except carbon monoxide) for 

which the limits are 2500 pounds per day unless the applicant shows that the new 

source is constructed using best available control technology.

(2) Modifications to Existing Stationary Sources: 

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall deny a permit to construct for any 

modification of any existing stationary source if such modification will result in a 

net increase in emissions of more than 250 pounds per day of nitrogen oxides, 

organic gases, or any air containment for which there is a national ambient air 

quality standard (except carbon monoxide) for which the limits are 2500 pounds 

per day) unless the applicant demonstrates that the modification of the existing 

stationary source will be constructed using best available control technology.
213-2 MDAQMD Rule 213 

Standards for Permits to Construct: Air Quality Impact d1 03/13/08

(c) Air Quality Impact Analysis:

(1) New Stationary Sources:

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall deny a permit to construct for any unit or 

units constituting a new stationary source if such source will emit more than 250 

pounds per day of nitrogen oxides, organic gases, or any air contaminant for 

which there is a national ambient air quality standard except carbon monoxide, for 

which the limits are 2500 pounds per day or which is a precursor of any such air 

contaminant, unless he determines that the emissions from the new source will not 

cause a violation of the national ambient air quality standard for that same 

contaminant (or, in the case of a precursor, for the contaminant to which the 

precursor contributes).

(2) Modifications to Existing Stationary Sources:

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall deny a permit to construct for any 

modification of any existing stationary source if the modification will result in a 

net increase in emissions from the existing source of more than 250 pounds per 

day of nitrogen oxides, organic bases, or any air contaminant for which there is a 

national ambient air quality standard (except carbon monoxide, for which the 

limits are 2500 pounds per day), or which is a precursor of any such air 

contaminant, unless he determines that the emissions from the modified source 

will not cause a violation of the national ambient air quality standard for that same 

contaminant, (or in the case of a precursor, for that contaminant to which the 

precursor contributes).

(d) Determination of Emission Increases: 

In determining under subsection (b) (2) (A) and subsection (c) (2) whether there has been 

a net increase in emissions and, if so, the amount of any such increase, the Air Pollution 

Control Officer shall consider all increases and decreases of emissions caused by 

modifications to that stationary source pursuant to permits to construct issued during the 

preceding five years, or since the adoption of this Rule, whichever period is shorter. 

Emission reductions required to comply with federal, state, or district laws, emission 

limitations, or rules or regulations shall not be considered to be in emissions for the 

purposes of this subsection.
MDAQMD Rule 213 213-3

Standards for Permits to Construct: Air Quality Impact, d1 03/13/08 

(e) Consideration of Future Emission Reductions: 

In making the analysis required in subsection (h) (2), the Air Pollution Control Officer shall take 

into consideration the air quality impact of any reduction in the emissions of the same air 

contaminant which results from the elimination or modification of other existing stationary 

sources under the same ownership and operating within the same air basin. If reductions are to be 

based on planned elimination or modification of any stationary sources, the Air Pollution Control 

Officer shall condition the permit to operate to require such elimination or modification within 

not more than 90 days after the start-up of the new or modified source. Emission reductions 

required to comply with federal, state or district laws, emission limitations, or rules or 

regulations shall not be considered to be decreases in emission for the purposes of this 

subsection.

(f) Exemptions:

(1) The Air Pollution Control Officer shall exempt from the provisions of subsection 

(c) of this Rule, any new stationary source or modification of any existing 

stationary source which:

(A) Will be in whole or in part a replacement for an existing stationary source 

at the same location if the resulting emissions of any air contaminant will 

not be increased. The Air Pollution Control Officer may allow a 

maximum of 90 days as a start-up period for simultaneous operation of the 

existing stationary source or replaced portions thereof, and the new 

stationary source or replacement: or

(B) Will cause demonstrable air quality benefits within the air basin, provided 

however, that the written concurrence of the California Air Resources 

Board and United States Environmental Protection Agency shall be 

obtained prior to the granting of an exemption hereunder: or

(C) Will be used exclusively for providing essential public services such as 

schools, hospitals, or police and fire fighting facilities, but specifically 

excluding sources of electrical power generation other than for emergency 

standby use at public service facilities: or

(D) Is exclusively a modification to convert from use of gaseous fuels to fuel 

oil because of demonstrable shortages of gaseous fuels, provided that all 

units constituting the modification will utilize best available control 

technology. Modifications for the purpose of this paragraph shall include 

the addition or modification of facilities for storing, transferring and/or 

transporting such fuel oil at the stationary sources. A condition shall be 

placed on the operating permit requiring conversion to gaseous or other 

equivalent low polluting fuels when they are, or become, available: or
213-4 MDAQMD Rule 213 

Standards for Permits to Construct: Air Quality Impact d1 03/13/08

(E) Is air pollution control equipment which, when in operation, will reduce 

emissions from an existing source: or

(F) Is portable sandblasting equipment used on a temporary basis within the 

air basin.

(2) The Air Pollution Control Officer may exempt from the provisions of subsection 

(c) of this Rule, any new stationary source, or modification of an existing 

stationary source, which has been determined to be:

(A) A new stationary source or modification of an exiting stationary source 

utilizing unique and innovative control technology which will result in a 

significantly lower emission rate from the source than would have 

occurred with the use of previously known best available control 

technology, to be applied to similar stationary sources within a State. In 

order for a stationary source to be exempted under this paragraph, the 

applicant must obtain the written concurrence of the California Air 

Resources Board and the United States Environmental Protection Agency 

with the Air Pollution Control Officer's determination: or

(B) A new stationary source or modification of an existing stationary source 

that represents a significant advance in the development of a technology 

that appears to offer extraordinary environmental or public health benefits 

or other benefits of overriding importance to the public health or welfare. 

In order for a stationary source to be exempted under this paragraph, the 

applicant must obtain the written concurrence of the California Air 

Resources Board and the United States Environmental Protection Agency 

with the Air Pollution Control Officer's determination.

(g) Notice Requirements for Proposed Exemptions:

Before granting an exemption under subsection (f) (1) (B), (f)(2)(A) or (f)(2)(B) of this 

Rule, the Air Pollution Control Officer shall publish a notice by prominent advertisement 

in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the District and shall notify in writing 

of his intention: the applicant, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the 

California Air Resources Board and adjoining air pollution control districts. Calculations 

and technical data used by the Air Pollution Control Officer as the basis for granting 

exemptions pursuant to subsection (f)(1)(B), (f)(2)(A) or (f)(2)(B) shall be made 

available to the California Air Resources Board and the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency. Before granting an exemption under subsection (f)(1)(B), (f)(2)(A) or 

(f) (1) (B) of this Rule, the Air Pollution Control Officer shall consider any comments 

received within 30 days after the date of publication or date of notification of the above 

agencies, whichever occurs later, and shall have obtained the concurrence of the 

California Air Resources Board and the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
MDAQMD Rule 213 213-5

Standards for Permits to Construct: Air Quality Impact, d1 03/13/08 

In addition, the Air Pollution Control Officer shall notify in writing the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board of the granting 

of an exemption under subsection (f)(1)(A), (f)(1)(C) or (f)(1)(D). 

(h) Procedures for Evaluation of Applications for Permits to Construct:

Before granting a permit to construct for any unit of a new stationary source or 

modification subject to the requirements of subsection (c) of this Rule, the Air Pollution 

Control Officer shall:

(1) Require the applicant to submit information sufficient to describe the nature and 

amounts of emissions, location, design, construction, and operation of the source, 

to submit any additional information required by the Air Pollution Control Officer 

to make the analysis required by this Rule.

(2) Analyze the effect of the operation of the new or modified stationary source on air 

quality in the vicinity of the new source or modified stationary source, within the 

air basin and within adjoining air basins. Such analysis shall consider the air 

contaminant emissions and in the vicinity of the new source or modified source 

within the air basin and within adjoining air basins at the time the new source or 

modification is proposed to commence normal operation. Such analysis shall be 

based on the application of existing state and local rule and regulations.

(3) Upon completion of the evaluation, but before granting a permit to construct:

(A) Publish a notice by prominent advertisement in at least one newspaper of 

general circulation in the District, stating the preliminary decision to grant 

the permit to construct and where the public may inspect the information 

required by this subsection. A copy of the notice shall also be sent to the 

applicant, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the 

California Air Resources Board and adjoining air pollution control 

districts. The notice shall provide a period of 30 days, beginning on the 

date of publication, or on the date of notification of the above agencies, 

whichever occurs later, for the public to submit comments on the 

application. 

(B) Make available for public inspection at the Mojave Desert Air Quality 

Management District, except as otherwise limited by law: the information 

submitted by the applicant, the Air Pollution Control Officer's analysis of 

the effect of the source on air quality and the preliminary decision to grant 

the permit to construct. Such information shall also be forwarded to the 

California Air Resources Board for review.

(C) Consider all comments submitted. If within the 30-day notice period the 

Air Pollution Control Officer receives a written request from either the 

United States Environmental Protection Agency or California Air 

Resources Board to defer the Air Pollution Control Officer's decision 
213-6 MDAQMD Rule 213 

Standards for Permits to Construct: Air Quality Impact d1 03/13/08

pending the requesting agency's review of the application, the Air 

Pollution Control Officer shall honor such request for a period of 60 days 

from the date of such request.

(i) Additional Applicant Requirements:

Receipt of a permit to construct shall not relieve the stationary source owner or operator 

of the responsibility to comply with other applicable portions of the District's Rules and 

Regulations.

(j) Severability:

If any portion of this Rule shall be found to be unenforceable, such finding shall have no 

effect on the enforceability of the remaining portions of the Rule, which shall continue to 

be in full force and effect.

[SIP: Not SIP; Superceded by approval of Reg. XIII as adopted 7/21/80, 6/9/82, 47 FR 25013 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(87)(iv); Approved 11/9/78, 43 FR 52237, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(39)(ii)(B) and 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(31)(vi)(C)] 
(Adopted: 01/01/77; CARB Ex. Ord. G-73: 02/01/77; 

Readopted: 07/25/77; Superceded by Regulation XIII as 

adopted: 07/21/80; Rescinded; mm/dd/yy)

MDAQMD RULE 213.1 213.1-1 

Standards for Permits to Operate: Air Quality Impact d1, 03/13/08 

RULE 213.1

Standards for Permits to Operate

Air Quality Impact

(a) Requirement for Permit to Construct as Condition for Permit to Operate:

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall deny a permit to operate for any stationary source 

subject to the requirements of Rule 213 unless the applicant has obtained a permit to 

construct.

(b) Air Quality Impact Analysis for Sources Emitting Larger Quantities of Air Contaminants 

Than Assumed in the Analysis Performed Pursuant to Rule 213:

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall not grant a permit to operate to any stationary 

source that he determines emits quantities of air contaminants larger than were assumed 

in the analysis performed for the permit to construct for the source, unless the Air 

Pollution Control Officer performs the air quality impact analysis required by Rule 213 

and determines that the actual emissions from the source will not cause a violation of, or 

will not interfere with the attainment or maintenance of, any state or national ambient air 

quality standard.

(c) Permit Conditions:

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall condition the issuance of a permit to operate, on 

such terms as are deemed necessary to ensure that the stationary source will be operated 

in the manner assumed in making the analysis required by Rule 213 or subsection (b) of 

this Rule, whichever is applicable. Where appropriate, such conditions shall prohibit a 

new stationary source which is a replacement for an existing stationary source from 

operating, unless the operation of the existing source is terminated. The Air Pollution 

Control Officer may allow a maximum of 90 days as a start-up period for simultaneous 

operation of the existing stationary source or replaced portion thereof, and the new 

stationary source or replacement portions thereof.

(d) Exemptions:

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall exempt from the provisions of this Rule, any 

stationary source which:

(1) Has received a permit to construct prior to the adoption of Rule 213.
213.1-2 MDAQMD Rule 213.1 

Standards for Permits to Operate: Air Quality Impact d1, 03/13/08

(2) Is a continuing operation, without modification, of a stationary source that was 

previously exempt from the permit provisions of these Rules and Regulations and 

a permit to operate is required solely because of a change of permit exemptions 

stated in Rule 219.

(e) Severability

If any portion of this Rule shall be found to be unenforceable, such finding shall have no 

effect on the enforceability of the remaining portions of the Rule, which shall continue to 

be in full force and effect.

[SIP: Not SIP; Superceded by approval of Reg. XIII as adopted 7/21/80, 6/9/82, 47 FR 25013 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(887)(iv); Approved 11/9/78. 43 FR 52237, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(39)(ii)(B) and 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(31)(vi)(C)] 
(Adopted: 01/01/77; CARB Ex. Ord. G-73: 02/01/77; Readopted: 

07/25/77; Superceded by Regulation XIII as adopted: 07/21/80; 

Rescinded: mm/dd/yy) 

MDAQMD Rule 213.2 213.2-1

Definitions for RULES 213, 213.1, and 213.3, d1 03/13/08 

RULE 213.2

Definitions for RULES 213, 213.1, and 213.3 

(a) STATIONARY SOURCE means a unit or an aggregation of units of non-vehicular aircontaminant-emitting equipment which is located on one property or on contiguous 

properties: which is under the same ownership or entitlement to use and operate: and, in 

the case of an aggregation of units, those units which are related to one another. Units 

shall be deemed related to one another if the operation of one is dependent upon, or affects 

the operation of the other: if their operation involves a common or similar raw material, 

product, or function: or if they have the same first three digits in their standard industrial 

classification codes as determined from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual

published in 1972 by the Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and 

Budget. In addition, in cases where all or part of a stationary source is a facility used to 

load cargo onto or unload cargo from cargo carriers, other than motor vehicles, the Air 

Pollution Control Officer shall consider such carriers to be part of the stationary source. 

Accordingly, all emissions from such carriers (excluding motor vehicles) which will result 

in an adverse impact on air quality in the State of California, shall be considered as 

emissions from such stationary source. Emissions from such carriers shall include those 

that result from the operation of the carriers' engines; the purging or other method of 

venting of vapors; and from the loading. unloading, storage, processing, and transfer of 

cargo.

(b) MAJOR STATIONARY SOURCE means any new stationary source which emits more 

than 250 pounds per day of nitrogen oxides, organic gases, or any air contaminant for 

which there is a national ambient air quality standard (except carbon monoxide, for which 

the limit is 2500 pounds per day) or any modified stationary source if the modification will 

result in a net increase in emissions from the existing source of more than 250 pounds per 

day of nitrogen oxides, organic gases, or any air contaminant for which there is a national 

ambient air quality standard (except carbon monoxide, for which the limit is 2500 pounds 

per day).

(c) MODIFICATION means any physical change in, or any change in the method of 

operation of, a stationary source. For the purpose of this definition:

(1) Routine maintenance or repair shall not be considered to be physical changes, and 

(2) An increase in production rate or operating hours shall not be considered to be a 

change in the method of operation, provided that these increases are not contrary to 

any existing permit to operate conditions. 
213.2-2 MDAQMD Rule 213.2 

Definitions for RULES 213, 213.1, and 213.3, d1 03/13/08

(d) BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY means the more stringent of: 

(1) The most effective emissions control technique which has been achieved in 

practice, for such category or class of course; or

(2) The control technique which will result in the achievement of the most stringent 

emissions limitation, in effect, which the EPA certifies is contained in the implementation plan of any State for such class or category or source unless the owner or 

operator of the proposed source demonstrates that such control techniques are not 

available (i.e. that such emissions limitations are not presently achievable). No 

control technique, the application of which would result in emissions from a new 

or modified source in excess of the amount allowable under applicable new source 

performance standards, may be considered to be BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL 

TECHNOLOGY.

(e) SEVERABILITY:

If any portion of this Rule shall be found to be unenforceable, such finding shall have no 

effect on the enforceability of the remaining portions of the Rule, which shall continue to 

be in full force and effect.

[SIP: Not SIP; Superceded by approval of Reg. XIII as adopted 7/21/80, 6/9/82, 47 FR 25013 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(87)(iv); Approved 11/9/78, 43 FR 52237, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(39)(ii)(B) and 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(31)(vi)(C)] 
(Adopted: 07/18/79; Superceded by Regulation XIII as 

Adopted: 07/21/80; Rescinded: mm/dd/yy)

MDAQMD Rule 213.3 213.3-1

Additional Standards for Permits To Construct And Operate, d1 03/13/08 

RULE 213.3

Additional Standards for Permits

To Construct And Operate

(a) The Air Pollution Control Officer shall deny a permit to construct for any new or 

modified major stationary source, unless the owner or operator has certified in writing 

prior to the issuance of such permit that all major stationary sources owned or operated 

by such person (or by any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control 

with such person) in the State of California are in compliance or are on a compliance 

schedule approved by the appropriate federal, state or District officials, with all 

applicable emission limitations and standards which are part of the EPA approved State 

Implementation Plan, new source performance standards and NESHAPS.

(b) The Air Pollution Control Officer shall deny a permit to construct, or a permit to operate, 

for any new or modified major stationary source unless he determines that construction of 

such new major stationary source would not interfere with the schedule for reasonable 

further progress set forth in the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District 

Implementation Plan.

[SIP: Not SIP; Superceded by approval of Reg. XIII as adopted 7/21/80, 6/9/82, 47 FR 25013, 40 

CFR 52.220(c)(87)(iv)] 
213.3-2 MDAQMD Rule 213.3 

Additional Standards for Permits To Construct And Operate, d1 03/13/08 

This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 B-1

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

Appendix “B” 

Public Notice Documents 

1. Proof of Publication – Daily Press, March 28, 2008 

2. Proof of Publication – Riverside Press Enterprise, March 28, 2008 
B-2 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 B-3

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 
B-4 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

This page intentionally left blank.
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 B-5

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 
B-6 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

This page intentionally left blank.
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 C-1

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08

Appendix “C” 

Public Comments and Responses 

No comments received to date 
C-2 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 D-1

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

Appendix “D” 

California Environmental Quality Act 

Documentation 

1. Notice of Exemption – San Bernardino County 

2. Notice of Exemption – Riverside County 
D-2 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 D-3

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08
D-4 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 
MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 E-1

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08

Appendix “E” 

Bibliography

The following documents were consulted in the preparation of this staff report. 

1. 40 CFR 52.220(c)(87)(iv)) – 06/09/82 47 FR 25013 

2. 40 CFR 52.220(c)(239)(i)(A)(1) – 11/13/96 61 FR 58133 

3. 12/04/96 61 FR 64291 

4. 05/13/99 64 FR 25828 
E-2 MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 

Final Staff Report, 06/30/08 

This page intentionally left blank