alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 946.25 Approval of Virginia abandoned mine land reclamation plan amendments.

(a) The following is a list of the dates amendments were submitted to OSM, the dates when the Director's decision approving all, or portions of these amendments, were published in the Federal Register and the State citations or a brief description of each amendment. The amendments in this table are listed in order of the date of final publication in the Federal Register.

| Original amendment submission date | Date of final publication | Citation/description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| November 8, 1985 | November 25, 1986 | VR 480-03-19.874 through 882. |
| February 3, 1987 | November 13, 1987 | VR 480-03-19.884.13(c) (2), (5), (6), (7), (d)(1), (2); Establish emergency program. |
| Feb. 29, 1996 | July 3, 1997 | Revisions to the Virginia State Reclamation Plan corresponding to 30 CFR 884.13(a), (b), (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(5), (c)(6), (c)(7), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3). |
| September 19, 1997 | February 5, 1998 | Revisions to the Virginia State Reclamation Plan corresponding to 30 CFR 884.13(c)(2)—Ranking and Selection: Set Aside Funds; and the AML Water Project Evaluation form. |
| September 10, 1999 | January 7, 2000 | Revisions to the Virginia State Reclamation Plan corresponding to 30 CFR 884.13(c)(2)—Ranking and Selection: Reclamation Projects Receiving Less Than 50% Government Funding. |

(b) You may receive a copy from:

(1) Virginia Division of Mined Land Reclamation, P.O. Drawer 900, Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219, or

(2) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Big Stone Gap Field Office, Powell Valley Square Shopping Center, 1941 Neeley Road, Suite 201, Compartment 116, Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219.

[62 FR 9957, Mar. 5, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 35968, July 3, 1997; 63 FR 5891, Feb. 5, 1998; 65 FR 1065, Jan. 7, 2000]
§ 2002.24 Agency self-inspection program. ( a ) The agency must establish a self-inspection program pursuant to the requirement in § 2002.8(b)(4).
( b ) The self-inspection program must include: ( 1 ) At least annual review and assessment of the agency's CUI program. The agency head or CUI SAO should determine any greater frequency based on program needs and the degree to which the agency engages in designating CUI;
( 2 ) Self-inspection methods, reviews, and assessments that serve to evaluate program effectiveness, measure the level of compliance, and monitor the progress of CUI implementation;
( 3 ) Formats for documenting self-inspections and recording findings when not prescribed by the CUI EA;
( 4 ) Procedures by which to integrate lessons learned and best practices arising from reviews and assessments into operational policies, procedures, and training;
( 5 ) A process for resolving deficiencies and taking corrective actions; and
( 6 ) Analysis and conclusions from the self-inspection program, documented on an annual basis and as requested by the CUI EA.
EXHIBIT 32.2

ALTERA CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Altera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Timothy R. Morse, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to
the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 25, 2009



/s/ TIMOTHY R. MORSETimothy R. Morse Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altera Corporation and will be retained by
Altera Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §6365. Contributions of annual leave

(a)(1) An employee may, by written application to the Leave Bank Board, request that a specified number of hours be transferred from the annual leave account of such employee to the leave bank established by such agency.

(2) An employee may state a concern and desire to aid a specified proposed leave recipient or a leave recipient in the application filed under paragraph (1).

(b)(1) Upon approving an application under subsection (a), the employing agency of the leave contributor may transfer all or any part of the number of hours requested for transfer, except that the number of hours so transferred may not exceed the limitations under paragraph (2).

(2)(A) In any one leave year, a leave contributor may contribute no more than a total of one-half of the amount of annual leave such contributor would be entitled to accrue during the leave year in which the contribution is made.

(B) A leave contributor who is projected to have annual leave that otherwise would be subject to forfeiture at the end of the leave year under section 6304(a) may contribute no more than the number of hours remaining in the leave year (as of the date of the contribution) for which the leave contributor is scheduled to work and receive pay.

(c) The Leave Bank Board of a leave contributor may waive the limitations under subsection (b)(2). Any such waiver shall be in writing.

(d) The Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations establishing an open enrollment period during which an employee may contribute leave under subsection (a) for a leave year.

(Added Pub. L. 100–566, §2(a), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2840.)
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

The undersigned officer of First National Lincoln Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act.In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: September 28, 2007

 

/s/ DANIEL R. DAIGNEAULT

Daniel R. Daigneault

President and Chief Executive Officer
RE: MATS RIA for OMB Distribution 12/09 (Message 1 of 2) 

12/09/2011 05:03 PM 

 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Hi Bob, 

I had a quick look at Ch. 3, and noticed reference to the TSD on the 

feasibility of retrofits has been removed. Are you cutting that TSD? 

Thanks, 

Cortney 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov 

[mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 4:15 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Fw: MATS RIA for OMB Distribution 12/09 (Message 1 of 2) 

Cortney, 

Attached below are the first portion of the revised MATS RIA chapters to 

be sent to OMB. (The remainder will follow in a 2nd email.) I have 

included redline and clean versions for every chapter but 4, which hasn't 

changed. This version includes revisions since the RIA delivered 11/23. 

The summary of changes document provides an overview of how we have 

addressed the comments received in the interagency process. 

(See attached file: MATS RIA Summary of Changes_1209.docx)(See attached 

file: 0_Executive SummaryMATS_1209_clean.doc)(See attached file: 

0_Executive SummaryMATS_1209 (REDLINE).docx)(See attached file: Chapter 

1_IntroductionBackground_1209_clean.doc)(See attached file: Chapter 

1_IntroductionBackground_1209 (REDLINE).doc)(See attached file: Chapter 

2_ElectricPowerSectorProfile_1209_clean.doc)(See attached file: Chapter 

2_ElectricPowerSectorProfile_1209 (REDLINE).doc)(See attached file: 

Chapter 3_CostEconomicEnergy_1209_clean.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 

3_CostEconomicEnergy_1209 (REDLINE).docx)(See attached file: Chapter 

4_mercuryHAPbenefits_1209 (NO CHANGES).docx) 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs 

Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

********************************************************* 

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

*********************************************************
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 11, 2015

NO. 03-14-00821-CV

Ha Duong Nhu and D&H Restaurant Equipment, Appellant

v.

Hunan Ranch Corporation, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND SHANNON*

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SHANNON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on June 30, 2014. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the district court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s judgment and 

remands the case to the district court for a new trial on the issue of lost profits. The appellee 

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.

* Before Bob E. Shannon, Chief Justice (retired), Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. 

See Tex. Gov’t Code § 74.003(b).
#### § 1908.22 [Reserved]
§ 1907.21 Exceptions. ( a ) Documents required to be submitted for prepublication review or other administrative process pursuant to an approved nondisclosure agreement is not covered by this section.
( b ) Whenever the Agency receives a classification challenge to information that has been the subject of a challenge within the past two years, the Agency is not required to process the challenge beyond informing the challenger of this fact and the prior review decision; advising the challenger of the right to appeal a final Agency decision to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP); and informing the challenger that if they wish to exercise this right, they must do so through Chief, Classification Management and Collaboration Group who will then forward the appeal to the ISCAP.
( c ) The Agency is not required to process classification challenges to information that is the subject of pending litigation. If the information that is the subject of a challenge falls into this category, the Agency will take no action on the challenge and will notify the challenger of this fact within 10 business days.
[76 FR 59031, Sept. 23, 2011]
# C_2008092EN.01002702.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/27

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 January 2008 — Efkon v Parliament and Council

(Case T-298/04) (1)

1

(Annulment - Directive 2004/52/EC - Interoperability of electronic road toll systems - Not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 92/55)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Efkon AG (Graz-Andritz, Austria) (represented by: G. Zanger, subsequently by M. Novak, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: U. Rösslein and A. Neergaard, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Lopes Sabino and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)

Defendants:

Intervener in support of the defendants: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Vidal Puig and G. Braun, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants:

Re:

Annulment in its entirety or, in the alternative, in part, of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 124, corrigendum OJ 2004 L 200, p. 50)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Efkon AG shall bear its own costs and pay those of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Efkon AG shall bear its own costs and pay those of the Council.

| 3. | The Parliament and the Commission shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Parliament and the Commission shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---
### §5733. Expeditious travel

The travel of an employee shall be by the most expeditious means of transportation practicable and shall be commensurate with the nature and purpose of the duties of the employee requiring such travel.

(Added Pub. L. 90–206, title II, §222(c)(1), Dec. 16, 1967, 81 Stat. 641.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective thirty days after Dec. 16, 1967, see section 220(a)(4) of Pub. L. 90–206, set out as an Effective Date of 1967 Amendment note under section 5542 of this title.
### §1119. Voluntary use of credentialing

#### (a) In general

An applicable individual who is subject to credentialing or a background investigation may satisfy that requirement by obtaining a valid transportation security card.

#### (b) Issuance of cards

The Secretary of Homeland Security—

(1) shall expand the transportation security card program, consistent with section 70105 of title 46, to allow an applicable individual who is subject to credentialing or a background investigation to apply for a transportation security card; and

(2) may charge reasonable fees, in accordance with section 469(a) of this title, for providing the necessary credentialing and background investigation.

#### (c) Vetting

The Administrator shall develop and implement a plan to utilize, in addition to any background check required for initial issue, the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Rap Back Service and other vetting tools as appropriate, including the No-Fly and Selectee lists, to get immediate notification of any criminal activity relating to any person with a valid transportation security card.

#### (d) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Applicable individual who is subject to credentialing or a background investigation

The term "applicable individual who is subject to credentialing or a background investigation" means only an individual who—

(A) because of employment is regulated by the Transportation Security Administration, Department of Transportation, or Coast Guard and is required to have a background records check to obtain a hazardous materials endorsement on a commercial driver's license issued by a State under section 5103a of title 49; or

(B) is required to have a credential and background records check under section 622(d)(2) of this title at a facility with activities that are regulated by the Transportation Security Administration, Department of Transportation, or Coast Guard.

#### (2) Valid transportation security card

The term "valid transportation security card" means a transportation security card that is—

(A) issued under section 70105 of title 46;

(B) not expired;

(C) shows 1 no signs of tampering; and

(D) bears 1 a photograph of the individual representing such card.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, §1977, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3617.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the TSA Modernization Act and also as part of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, and not as part of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition

For definition of "Administrator" as used in this section, see section 1902 of Pub. L. 115–254, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 49, Transportation.

1 So in original.
###### **Exhibit  99.1**

 

##### CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

 

In connection with theYear End Report of  The WashingtonCorporation  (the “Company”) on Form10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William N. Demas, theChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge,

 

a)              The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

b)             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| /s/ William N. Demas |
|----------------------|

William N. Demas

Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2003

 

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6033

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JEREMY MOUZON, a/k/a Ferris Earl Scott Green, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00896-PMD-1; 2:07-cv-70041-PMD) Submitted: June 24, 2008 Decided: August 19, 2008 Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeremy Mouzon, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jeremy Mouzon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mouzon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
First Amendment to Land Lease and Easement Agreement



 Exhibit 10.12(a) 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to Land Lease and Easement Agreement
(this “Amendment”) is entered into as of December 30, 2005 by and between Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. (“Lessor”) and MagnaChip Semiconductor Ltd. (“Lessee”) (each a “Party”, and collectively the
“Parties”). 
 WHEREAS, the Parties are parties to that certain Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated as of October 6, 2004 (the
“Agreement”), and wish to amend the Agreement as set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 4.2 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

 “Lessor shall provide an invoice (the “Invoice”) to Lessee by the last day of each calendar month which shall include the amount of Rent, Other Costs and the corresponding VAT amount payable by Lessee
for such month.” 
  

	 	2.	Section 4.3 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

 “Lessee shall pay in aggregate the Rent, Other Costs and the corresponding VAT amount stated on each Invoice to the Lessor’s designated account, or as otherwise designated by Lessor, by means of wire
transfer in immediately available funds by the 25th day of the next calendar month following the date of the Invoice
(the “Due Date”).” 
  

	 	3.	Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 

  

	 	4.	Wherever necessary, all terms of the Agreement are hereby amended to be consistent with the terms of this Amendment. Except as set forth herein, the Agreement remains in full force
and effect according to its terms. 

  

	 	5.	This Amendment shall become effective from the 6th of October, 2004. 

  

 1 









	 	6.	This Amendment shall be governed by, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of Korea. 

 [Signature Page Follows] 
  

 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Amendment as of the
date first set forth above. 
  

			
	MagnaChip Semiconductor, Ltd.
		
	 By:
	 	  
	 Name:
	 	 Youm Huh

	 Title:
	 	 President & Chief Executive Officer

	
	 Hynix Semiconductor, Inc.

		
	 By:
	 	  
	 Name:
	 	
	 Title:
	 	

  

 3