alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6524** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. JAYCONUS CORNELLIUS SCOTT , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg
. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 7:08

- cr - 00211

- HMH

- 8 )

Submitted : June 1 6 , 2011 Decided: June 21, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Ju dge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jayconus Cornellius Scott , Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens , Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jayconus Cornellius Scott appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking credit toward his prison
sentence imposed after the revocation of his term of supervised release. Upon revocation of Scott’s supervis ed release, which was imposed as part of his sentence for conspiracy to defraud the United States, the district court sentenced Scott to six months’ imprisonment in February 2011. In April 2011, Scott moved the district court for credit toward the revocat ion sentence, arguing that he was entitled to credit for time served in a state prison from September 22, 2010 until sentencing on February 14, 2011
. District courts, however, are not authorized to compute credit for time spent in official deten tion when sentencing a convict. United States v. Wilson , 503 U.S. 329, 333 (1992). Rather, only the Attorney General, acting through the Bureau of Prisons, may compute sentencing credit
. Id. at 334

- 35. The district court was therefore without the authority
to a ward Scott credit for the time he spent in state custody. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Scott , No. 7:08

- cr - 00211

- HMH

- 8 (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions a re adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of EDO Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the six month period ended June 28, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Frederic
B. Bassett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respect, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Frederic B. Bassett
------------------------
Frederic B. Bassett
Chief Financial Officer
August 6, 2003
### §970. Noncontainerized cargo

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall consider the potential for participation in C–TPAT by importers of noncontainerized cargoes that otherwise meet the requirements under this part.

(Pub. L. 109–347, title II, §220, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1914.)
Appeal No. 77-96.

#### Muriel Jeannette Falardeau *v.*John Alfred Falardeau.

*Lavine & Sutherland, Lewis Z. Lavine,*for petitioner.

*Richard R. Acker-*

*man, Inc.,*for respondent.

The respondent’s motion to stay the decision of the Family Court judge in this case is denied.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Earnings in Cotton-Goods Manufacture During the War Years

              																	Kanninen, Toivo Peter					,	Schloss, Clara Fuchsberg					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Earnings in Cotton-Goods Manufacture During the War Years : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 798*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4270,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 12.2  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Paul Victor, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Sasol Limited;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarise and report financial information; and  b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: 28   August 2017By:
/s/ PAUL VICTORPaul VictorChief Financial Officer
### §21053. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated for grants under this subpart $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.

#### (b) Availability of funds

Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization under this section shall remain available, without fiscal year limitation, until expended.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title II, §283, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1702.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15453 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 536.147 Claims by NAFI employees for losses incident to employment.

Claims by employees for the loss of or damage to personal property incident to employment will be processed in the manner prescribed by AR 27-20, chapter 11 and will be paid from NAFs in accordance with § 536.152.
#### Gladys Briggs et al., Respondents, v. Spencerport Road Plaza, Inc., Defendant, and Loblaw’s, Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs sue to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff wife when she fell in a store operated by defendant, Loblaw’s, Inc., (herein Loblaw) in a shopping plaza owned by the codefendant. Plaintiffs’ attorney obtained from one of Loblaw’s employees who witnessed the accident, *944a signed statement. Loblaw was denied a discovery and inspection thereof and appeals. Subdivision (e) of section 3101 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules provides that *“ A*party may obtain a copy of his own statement.” This provision “is designed to enable an examining party to obtain his own statements without the difficult burden of proving special circumstances, such as fraud or over-reaching, on the part of the recipient of the statement — often an investigator from an opponent’s insurance company. While there was no counterpart in the Civil Practice Act to subdivision (e), it is supported .by recent decisions” (citing, among other cases, *Sacks*v. *Greyhound Corp.,*18 A D 2d 747). (4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prae., par. 3101.56.) If a party is entitled to receive a statement obtained by his adversary, we see no valid reason upon the present facts why this corporation should not be entitled to receive from plaintiffs the statement made by its employee. (Appeal from an order of Monroe Special Term denying motion requiring plaintiffs to produce and discover a statement.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, MeClusky, Henry and Noonan, JJ.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Spendable Earnings of Factory Workers, 1941-43

              																	Tolles, N. Arnold. 						*Spendable Earnings of Factory Workers, 1941-43 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 769*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4250,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                     27,202,000          
<SECURITIES>                               10,712,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              13,038,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                1,130,400
<INVENTORY>                                68,900,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          123,215,000 
<PP&E>                                    274,740,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            147,398,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            280,743,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      96,330,000
<BONDS>                                   100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 33,169,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              280,743,000
<SALES>                                   466,098,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          466,098,000
<CGS>                                     348,704,000         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             348,704,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          110,784,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          5,572,000     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,038,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,038,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                1,038,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $0.09
        
 

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0530

COLBERT'S ELECTRIC, INC.,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

LOCALOOP, INC.,

 Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT David L. Vicevich, whose name appears next on the list

of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this November 30, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Randall J. Colbert, Rachel Hendershot Parkin, 

Perry J. Schneider, David L. Vicevich

11/30/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0530
#### A. L. Flaningham *v.*C. Eugene Hogue.

*Filed at Ottawa June 13, 1896.*

Appeals and *errors—no question of law presented—effect.*A judgment of affirmance of the Appellate Court in an action of debt will be affirmed where no question of law is presented upon the record.

*Flaningham v. Hogue,*59 Ill. App. 315, affirmed.

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. F. Dunne, Judge, presiding.

A. L. Flaningham, *pro*se.

C. M. Hardy, for defendant in error.

*130Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court:

This was an action in debt, brought by A. L. Flaningham, against C. Eugene Hogue, in the circuit court of Cook county, to recover a balance claimed to be due on a judgment rendered July 22, 1885, in the same court, for $901.69, in favor of the former and against the latter. By agreement of the parties the cause was tried before the court without a jury, and the court rendered judgement in favor of the defendant. The Appellate Court affirmed that judgment, and the cause is brought here by writ of error.

By the judgments below the facts in the case have been settled adversely to the plaintiff in error.

No written propositions to be held as law by the trial court in the decision of the case'-were submitted to the court and no questions of law were otherwise raised, consequently there is no question presented by the record for our determination. *Bank of Michigan City*v. *Haskell,*124 Ill. 587; *Myers*v. *Union Nat. Bank,*128 id. 478; *Consolidated Coal Co.*v. *Peers,*150 id. 344.

The judgment of the Appellate Court will therefore be affirmed.

*„Judgment affirmed.*
<PAGE>


                   EXHIBIT 21. SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT






                                       41
<PAGE>


                    THE WASHINGTON CORPORATION - SUBSIDIARIES
                             As of December 31, 1997


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   State of
                                                  Formation or                Date of
            Subsidiary                            Incorporation               Formation
            ----------                            -------------               ---------
<S>                                               <C>                           <C>
Arlington Square Limited Partnership                 Maryland                   09/17/85

Four Year Trail Limited Partnership                  Virginia                   09/16/87

Nanjemoy Associates Limited Partnership              Maryland                   01/11/88

TWC Development Corporation                          Maryland                   04/08/85

TWC Real Estate, Inc.                                Virginia                   04/15/85

Arlington Square, Inc.                               Virginia                   02/28/91

Four Year Trail, Inc.                                Virginia                   02/28/91

</TABLE>



                                       42
Exhibit A



AMENDMENT TO HANDLEMAN COMPANY 1998 STOCK

OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN AND 2001 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN



Effective as of the date hereof the Handleman Company 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan is amended, by replacing the existing Paragraph 18 (e) and (f),
in its entirety, and the 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan is amended by replacing the existing Paragraph 17 (e) and (f), in its entirety, with the following:



| | (e) | Stock certificates may be issued in respect of shares of restricted stock awarded hereunder, in which event the certificates shall be registered in the name of the Participant. Such
certificates, if issued, shall be deposited with the Corporation or its designee, together with a stock power endorsed in blank, and, in the discretion of the Committee, a legend shall be placed upon such certificates reflecting that the shares
represented thereby are subject to restrictions against transfer and forfeiture. In the discretion of the Committee, in lieu of issuing certificates for shares of restricted stock granted hereunder, the shares may be registered in the name of the
Participant and held in book entry form by the Corporations stock transfer agent.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (f) | At the expiration of the restricted period applicable to the shares, the Corporation shall deliver to the Participant or the legal representative of the Participants estate
stock certificates for the shares. If certificates for the shares have previously been issued and a legend has been placed on such certificates, the Corporation shall cause such certificates to be reissued without the legend.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



As adopted by the Board of Directors on April 6, 2004.
### §1026. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section, acts July 22, 1937, ch. 517, title IV, §52, 50 Stat. 532; Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 964, §3, 60 Stat. 1064, related to penalties. See sections 657, 658, 1006, and 1014 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.