alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant 

 

S-K Item 601 (21) - Subsidiaries of the Registrant: 

 

Artist to Market Distribution LLC, a Michigan LLC 

 

Crave Entertainment Group, Inc., a California Corporation 

 

Crave Entertainment, Inc., a California Corporation 

 

Entertainment Fulfillment Services, L.L.C., a Michigan LLC 

 

Handleman Canada, Inc., a Canadian Corporation 

 

Handleman Category Management Company, a Michigan Corporation 

 

Handleman Company of Canada, Limited, an Ontario Corporation 

 

Handleman de Argentina S.R.L. 

 

Handleman de Mexico S.A. de C.V. 

 

Handleman do Brasil Commercial Ltda. 

 

Handleman Entertainment Resources, L.L.C., a Michigan LLC 

 

Handleman Ontario Ltd., a British Virgin Islands Corporation 

 

Handleman Real Estate, LLC, a Michigan LLC 

 

Handleman UK Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation 

 

Hanley Advertising Company, a Michigan Corporation 

 

Lifetime Holding, Inc., a Michigan Corporation 

 

Rackjobbing Services, S.A. de C.V. 

 

REPS, L.L.C., a Michigan LLC 

 

SVG Distribution, Inc., a California Corporation 

 

The itsy bitsy Entertainment Company, a Delaware Corporation
EXHIBIT 32.1


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNASIL CORPORATION
OF AMERICA (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We, Craig T
Dunham, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Company and
Laura Lunardo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and result of operations of The Company.



                                    /s/ Craig T Dunham
                                   -------------------
                                   Craig T Dunham
                                   President and Chief Executive
                                   Officer


                                   /s/ Laura Lunardo
                                   -------------------
                                   Laura Lunardo
                                   Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2007
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

## ©FF8G8ALBUSI 

## STATE OFTEXAS/. PENALTY FOR 12/17/2014 r COOPER, MARCUS 4 

## ft PITNEY BOWES 02 1M 9 UU 0004279596 DEC 1 8 2014 

## MAILEDFROMZjtfRIg^&'-fK IS

This is to advise that the Court has denied without written order motion for leave to 

### file the original application for writ otmandamus Abel Acosta, Clerk 

## JVIARCUSJ^OOPER

N3B "7B20" 

## !l2'00!MP6e¥^LVFORMATION •'''•"''"'TOlDENTir' loganon 

# TO SENDE tb 

# .WCOMPLETBiNFWMATlON 

# ii'Mh-'ilimiil'-qi |N^^ I 1 1OCAlIONTO U-

- ••

_ •__ J
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





Date: March 16, 2018








/s/F. Stephen Ward


F. Stephen Ward


Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 1660.10 Procedures—fees. Parties seeking official information by litigation request or demand may be charged reasonable fees to reimburse expenses associated with the Government's response. These reimbursable expenses may include the cost of: ( a ) Materials and equipment used to search for, copy, and produce responsive information.
( b ) Personnel time spent processing and responding to the request or demand.
( c ) Attorney time spent assisting with the Government's response, to include reviewing the request or demand and the potentially responsive information.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 11, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41555

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN ANTONIO REYES-JUAREZ, also known as Juan Reyes-Juarez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:06-CR-188-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Antonio

Reyes-Juarez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Nash, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated September 8, 1961, denying, after a hearing, his *coram nobis*application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered June 27, 1958 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a third felony offender. *932to serve a term of four to five years. Order affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
### Potentially favorable areas for large-yield wells in the Red River Formation and Madison Limestone in parts of Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming

By: L.M. MacCaryE. M. CushingD.L. Brown

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1273E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Potentially favorable areas for large-yield wells in the Red River Formation and Madison Limestone in parts of Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, and Nebraska(1981)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### MILNER v. LITTLEJOHN

No. 307P97

Case below: 126 N.CApp. 184

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 24
- 00253
- CV

__________________
IN RE BAYTOWN APARTMENT GROUP LLC, D/B/A PORT ARTHUR TOWNHOMES, GURINDA SINGH AKHTAR, AMBERS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, AIR AKHTAR, LLC, AND JEFF AKHTAR

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 136th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. D206,018

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators Baytown Apartment Group LLC, d/b/a Port Arthur Townhomes, Gurinda Singh Akhtar, Ambers Construction, LLC, Air Akhtar, LLC, and Jeff Akhtar filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a motion to stay all trial court proceedings while we consider the petition

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( b) ;

s ee also Tex. R. App. P. 52. 10(a). Relators argue the trial court abused its discretion by denying Relators ’ no evidence motion for summary judgment and that they lack an ade quate remedy by appeal because the case is still pending

.2 Mandamus relief is an extraordinary remedy that issues only to correct a clear abuse of discretion for which the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal

. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

- 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). “[M]andamus is generally unavailable when a trial court denies summary judgment, no matter how meritorious the motion.” In re McAllen Med. Ctr., Inc. , 275 S.W.3d 458, 465 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding). One exception occurs when “the very act of proceeding to trial

— regardless of the outcome

— would defeat the substantive right involved. ” In re Academy, Ltd. , 625 S.W.3d 19, 32 (Tex.
2021 ) (orig. proceeding). After considering the mandamus petition and appendix , we conclude that Relators have failed to establish that the trial court ’ s order denying their motion for summary judgment constitute s an abuse of discretion from which there is no adequate remedy by appeal. We deny the petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PETITION DENIED

. PER CURIAM Submitted on Augu st 7, 2024 Opinion Delivered August 8, 2024 Before Golemon , C.J., Johnson and Wright , JJ.
#### Francis E. O’Neill, Appellant, v. James Kohls, as Executor of Leon W. Kohls, Deceased, Respondent.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The cause of action arose in Genesee County and despite technical defects in the papers, we think it is sufficiently shown that the convenience of witnesses will be promoted by changing the place of trial from Monroe County to Genesee County. (See *Wilson*v. *Orser,*243 App. Div. 855.) The order should be modified by striking out the two ordering paragraphs thereof and substituting in place *889thereof the following: “ Ordered that the first and second above entitled actions be removed from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, and joined for trial with the third above entitled action in Genesee County.” (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting defendant’s motion to change the place of trial from Genesee County to Monroe County, and denying motion to join the first action with the second and third, without prejudice to renew.) Present—-Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ
#### Miriam M. Mintz, Appellant, v. T. Louis Mintz, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente and Stevens, JJ.
#### § 1907.11 Prerequisites.

The Central Intelligence Agency has established liaison and procedures with many agencies for declassification issues. Prior to reliance on this Part, authorized holders are required to first exhaust such established administrative procedures for the review of classified information. Further information on these procedures is available from the point of contact, see 32 CFR 1907.03.
#### Brazil Stamping *&*Manufacturing Company, appellee, v. Practical Die *&*Specialty Manufacturing Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,398.

Suit in replevin. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. George Fred Rush, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Joel 0. Carlson, for appellant.

Bernstein, Zoila & Bernstein, for appellee; Fred Bernstein, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.
### SUBCHAPTER XV—HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                    1,470
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            27,680
<ALLOWANCES>                              1,608
<INVENTORY>                              18,587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         53,035
<PP&E>                                   18,563
<DEPRECIATION>                           13,906

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           68,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    22,465
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  2,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                               20,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             68,882
<SALES>                                  35,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         35,847
<CGS>                                    25,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            25,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          6,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           2,695
<INCOME-TAX>                              1,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,658
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              1,658
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.26




</TABLE>
#### In re WARREN’S ESTATE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 13, 1903.)

In the matter of the estate of Gardner D. Warren.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
### [§5337. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–454, title VIII, §801(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1221]

Section, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 470; Pub. L. 92–392, §3, Aug. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 573, set forth provisions relating to pay saving for employees reduced in grade from a grade in the General Schedule. See section 5361 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on first day of first applicable pay period beginning on or after 90th day after Oct. 13, 1978, and an employee receiving pay on day before such effective date not to have such pay reduced or terminated and, unless section 5362 applies, employee is entitled to continuation of such pay, etc., see section 801(a)(4) of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5361 of this title.
#### R. M. Tashjian, appellee, v. H. M. Tashjian, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,491.

Action upon a stated account. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Alfar M. Eberhardt, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the

first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 3, 1925.

Edward C. Guilmez, for appellant.

Jeffery, Townley, Wild, Campbell & Clark, for appellee; Charles V. Clark and Frederick D. Carroll, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThermocapillary flows and their stability:  Effects of surface layers and combinationThe theoretical analysis of the fluid mechanics and heat transfer of motions driven by surface tension gradients (Marangoni convection) was researched. Convection accompanying the process of growing high quality single crystals from the melt in a micro-g environment was examined. The geometries considered include two dimensional liquid filled slots and axisymmetric float-zone configurations.Document ID19840009454Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDavis, S. H.*(Northwestern Univ. Evanston, IL, United States)*Homsy, G. M.*(Stanford Univ.)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-170962NAS 1.26:170962Accession Number84N17522Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-33881Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840009454.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### C. C. Stevens, appellant, v. Lavinia McConnell Donaldson and Percy Donaldson, appellees.

Gen. No. 29,515.

Suit to foreclose mortgage. Decree dismissing bill for want of equity. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Francis S. Wilson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

Rehearing denied April 27, 1925.

Louis Reineeker, Jr., for appellant; Walter Hamilton, of counsel Cyrus Heren, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                            <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997 
<CASH>                                               40,342 
<SECURITIES>                                              0       
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,696,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (214,200)
<INVENTORY>                                       6,675,906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 12,938,723
<PP&E>                                            3,674,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (1,408,834)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   15,696,572 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10,532,163
<BONDS>                                                   0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0   
<COMMON>                                            201,970   
<OTHER-SE>                                        4,222,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     15,696,572
<SALES>                                           7,709,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7,709,241
<CGS>                                             6,217,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6,217,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,266,887  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  187,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      37,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  37,415 
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0 
<CHANGES>                                                 0 
<NET-INCOME>                                         37,415 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .02 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .02 
        

</TABLE>