alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 10(iii)A4(b)


                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                        SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN FOR
                EXECUTIVES OF NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.
           (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 1994)


         THIS AMENDMENT made this 16th day of March, 1994, by NATIONAL SERVICE
INDUSTRIES, INC. (the "Company");

         WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Supplemental Retirement Plan for
Executives of National Service Industries, Inc. (the "Plan") for the benefit of
certain eligible executives of the Company; and

         WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective as of January 1,
1994; and

         WHEREAS, the Company now desires to clarify certain provisions of the
Plan in the manner hereinafter provided;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

                                       1.

         Section 1.1(a)(i) is hereby amended by adding the following after the
parenthetical in the seventh line of the present section:

         ", increased for purposes of this offset for any Participant who would
         not have been eligible for Early Retirement under Pension Plan C as in
         effect prior to February 15, 1989, buy who elects Early Retirement
         hereunder, by recalculating his February 14, 1989 accrued benefit as
         if he were eligible for an Early Retirement benefit."

                                       2.

         Section 1.1(gg)(2) is hereby amended by deleting the language after
the word "assuming" in the fourth line of the present section and substituting
the following therefor:

         "that he had no Compensation or other earnings after his date of
         termination of employment; and"


<PAGE>
                                       3.

         The amendment in Paragraph 1 shall be effective as of January 1, 1994
and the amendment in Paragraph 2 shall be effective as of July 1, 1983. Except
as hereby amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be
executed by its duly authorized officers the day and year first above written.


ATTEST:                             NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.



                                    By:
-------------------------------        ----------------------------------------
                                       David Levy
                                       Executive Vice President,
                                       Administration and Counsel

(CORPORATE SEAL)
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
American Vantage Companies

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statement No 333-00905
on Form S-8 of American Vantage Companies of our report dated October 9, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of American Vantage Companies as of
July 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which
report appears in the July 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-KSB of American
Vantage Companies.



/s/ Bradshaw, Smith & Co., LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
October 25, 2001
#### § 2001.20 General.

A uniform security classification system requires that standard markings or other indicia be applied to classified information. Except in extraordinary circumstances, or as approved by the Director of ISOO, the marking of classified information shall not deviate from the following prescribed formats. If markings cannot be affixed to specific classified information or materials, the originator shall provide holders or recipients of the information with written instructions for protecting the information. Markings shall be uniformly and conspicuously applied to leave no doubt about the classified status of the information, the level of protection required, and the duration of classification.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA study of pump cavitation damageThe cavitation assessment for the space shuttle main engine high pressure oxidizer turbopump is documented. A model of the flow through the pump was developed. Initially, a computational procedure was used to analyze the flow through the inlet casing including the prediction of wakes downstream of the casing vanes. From these flow calculations, cavitation patterns on the inducer blades were approximated and the damage rate estimated. The model correlates the heavy damage on the housing and over the inducer with unsteady blade surface cavitation. The unsteady blade surface cavitation is due to the large incidence changes caused by the wakes of the upstream vanes. Very high cavitation damage rates are associated with this type of cavitation. Design recommendations for reducing the unsteady cavitation include removing the set of vanes closest to the inducer and modifying the remaining vanes.Document ID19840012715Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBrophy, M. C.*(Applied Research Lab. State College, PA, United States)*Stinebring, D. R.*(Applied Research Lab. State College, PA, United States)*Billet, M. L.*(Applied Research Lab. State College, PA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 30, 1983Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:170992NASA-CR-170992Accession Number84N20783Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-34535Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840012715.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2008223EN.01000301.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 July 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-371/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 92/50/EEC - Articles 11 and 15(2) - Public service contracts - Award of IT services of the municipality of Mantova (Italy) - Direct award without prior publication of a notice to tender)

(2008/C 223/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis, C. Zadra, L. Visaggio and C. Cattabriga, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia, Agent and G. Fiengo, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 11 and Article 15(2) of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ L 209, 24.7.1992, p. 1) — Award of IT services for the Commune di Mantova — Direct award without prior publication of a contract notice

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 14.1.2006.

1

---
#### Hughes Contracting Industries, Ltd., Respondent, v A & N Restoration, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[834 NYS2d 146]

*379Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered on or about September 20, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied respondents’ cross motion to vacate an arbitration award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Respondents did not show that the award was subject to vacatur pursuant to CPLR 7511 (b). Specifically, they failed to demonstrate that the arbitrator was biased, much less that they sustained prejudice attributable to any such bias *(see Artists & Craftsmen Bldrs. v Schapiro,*232 AD2d 265 [1996]). Nor did they demonstrate that the award violated strong public policy, was irrational or in excess of the arbitrator’s power *(see Matter of Henneberry v ING Capital Advisors, LLC,*37 AD3d 353 [2007]). Bearing in mind particularly that an arbitrator is not bound by principles of substantive law, and may do justice as he or she sees fit, even if, in doing so, the arbitrator misconstrues aspects of an agreement *(id.),*we perceive no ground to find the award irrational. Nor do we perceive any substantial basis for respondents’ claim that they were coerced into consenting to the arbitrator’s appointment. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Williams and Catterson, JJ.
§ 21.530 What are the responsibilities of the DAADS Administrator? The DAADS Administrator, consistent with guidance issued by the PDASD(R&E): ( a ) Processes DAADS information twice a month and prepares recurring and special reports using such information.
( b ) Prepares, updates, and disseminates instructions for reporting information to the DAADS. The instructions are to specify procedures, formats, and editing processes to be used by DoD Components, including record layout, submission deadlines, media, methods of submission, and error correction schedules.
[85 FR 51241, Aug. 19, 2020]
From: Jennifer.Zagorski@potashcorp.com

To: Jim Staudt

Subject: Re: urea delivered to Wyoming

Date: Monday, October 15, 2012 4:43:20 PM

Hi Jim,

I hope you are well. Green Market's NOLA average for urea for September was $430 per short ton

FOB. Our list price is $650 per short ton FOB for commercial grade urea.

Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Kind Regards,

Jen

Jennifer A Zagorski

PCS Sales

1101 Skokie Blvd

Northbrook, IL 60062

Phone: 847.849.4377 

Fax: 847.849.4489

Cell: 847.612.5301 

Email: jennifer.zagorski@potashcorp.com 

From: "Jim Staudt" <staudt@andovertechnology.com>

To: "'Jennifer A. Zagorski'" <jennifer.zagorski@potashcorp.com>

Date: 10/15/2012 03:10 PM

Subject: urea delivered to Wyoming

Jen,

Could you give me a rough estimate of what urea would cost delivered to

Wyoming on a $/st basis? I need the number for a report that is due on

Friday. So, if you could provide it to me Wednesday, I'd be grateful. I apologize for the short notice.

Best Regards,

Jim Staudt, Ph.D., CFA

Andover Technology Partners

office: 978-683-9599

mobile: 978- 884-5510
[attachment "winmail.dat" deleted by Jennifer Zagorski/Sales/Northbrook/Inc/PCS]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Tradequest International, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luis Alvarez, CEO of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                        /s/Luis Alvarez
May 15, 2007                            Luis Alvarez, CEO,
                                        principal executive officer
                                        and principal accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a)
      AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

     Dated: September 23, 2004                 /S/ VICTOR INSETTA
            ----------------------             ---------------------------
                                               Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
### §962. Eligible entities

Importers, customs brokers, forwarders, air, sea, land carriers, contract logistics providers, and other entities in the international supply chain and intermodal transportation system are eligible to apply to voluntarily enter into partnerships with the Department under C–TPAT.

(Pub. L. 109–347, title II, §212, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1909.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9054-6]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 

Filed December 17, 2020 10 a.m. EST Through December 23, 2020 10 a.m. EST 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

EIS No. 20200263, Draft, DOE, ID, Draft Versatile Test Reactor Environment Impact Statement, Comment Period Ends: 02/16/2021, Contact: James Lovejoy 208-526-6805.

EIS No. 20200264, Draft, NMFS, ME, Regulatory Impact Review, and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Amending the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan: Risk Reduction Rule, Comment Period Ends: 03/01/2021, Contact: Colleen Coogan 978-281-9181.

## Amended Notice

EIS No. 20200199, Draft, USA, AK, Heat and Electrical Upgrades at Fort Wainwright, Alaska, Comment Period Ends: 02/22/2021, Contact: Laura Sample 907-361-6323. Revision to FR Notice Published 10/09/2020; Extending the Comment Period from 12/08/2020 to 02/22/2021.

Dated: December 23, 2020.

Cindy S. Barger,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2020-28940 Filed 12-30-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
KEYON IKEEM CARLTON

BELL

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 4

- 1739

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 16, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. James H. Daniel , Judge.

Wm. J. Sheppard, Elizabeth L. White, Matthew R. Kachergus, and Bryan E. DeMaggio of Sheppard, White, Kachergus & De Maggio, P.A., Jacksonville , for Appellant

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel A. Perrone, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, WETHERELL

, and SWANSON , JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 15.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors Given Imaging Ltd: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (File No. 333-111310 and 333-152335) on Form
S-8 of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. of our report dated March 24, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Given Imaging Ltd. (the Company) and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 20-F of
Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption by the Company of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006 and to the adoption of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, effective January 1, 2007. /s/ Somekh Chaikin Somekh Chaikin

Certified Public Accountants (Israel)

Member firm of KPMG International Tel-Aviv, Israel

June 25, 2009
Exhibit
      32.1








The
      following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation’s Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 and is
      not
      filed as provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission.





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes—Oxley
      Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics Research
      Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
                7, 2007
            /s/
                James P. ReganChairman,
                President and Chief Executive
                Officer
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1713-1 Arrangements for emergency medical assistance and transportation for injured persons; agreements; reporting requirements; posting requirements. ( a ) Each operator of an underground coal mine shall make arrangements with a licensed physician, medical service, medical clinic, or hospital to provide 24-hour emergency medical assistance for any person injured at the mine.
( b ) Each operator of an underground coal mine shall make arrangements with an ambulance service, or otherwise provide, for 24-hour emergency transportation for any person injured at the mine.
( c ) Each operator shall, on or before December 30, 1970, report to the District Manager for the district in which the mine is located the name, title and address of the physician, medical service, medical clinic, hospital or ambulance service with whom arrangements have been made, or otherwise provided, in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this § 75.1713-1.
( d ) Each operator shall, within 10 days after any change of the arrangements required to be reported under the provisions of this § 75.1713-1, report such changes to the District Manager. If such changes involve a substitution of persons, the operator shall provide the name, title, and address of the person substituted together with the name and address of the medical service, medical clinic, hospital, or ambulance service with which such person or persons are associated.
( e ) Each operator shall, immediately after making an arrangement required under the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this § 75.1713-1, or immediately after any change of such arrangement, post at appropriate places at the mine the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of all persons or services currently available under such arrangements to provide medical assistance and transportation at the mine.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 1350 Certification of the**

**Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, Michael Smith, the chief financial officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.
### §394. Unsolicited proposals

#### (a) Regulations required

Within 1 year of November 25, 2002, the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be revised to include regulations with regard to unsolicited proposals.

#### (b) Content of regulations

The regulations prescribed under subsection (a) shall require that before initiating a comprehensive evaluation, an agency contact point shall consider, among other factors, that the proposal—

(1) is not submitted in response to a previously published agency requirement; and

(2) contains technical and cost information for evaluation and overall scientific, technical or socioeconomic merit, or cost-related or price-related factors.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §834, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2227.)