alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DAILY READING FILE 

Message Information 

Date 07/14/20 1 1 04:46 PM 

From "Rhoten, Kathleen" <Kathleen.Rhotenlegislature.maine.gov>


To <ray.lahooddot.gov >; LisaP Jackson/DC/USEPAIUS@EPA 

cc 

Subject National Fuel Economy Standards 

Message Body 

Good afternoon: 

The attached is sent per the request of Representative Philip A. Curtis, State of Maine. 

A hardcopy of the attached letter has been sent to your respective offices. 

Kathleen Rhoten 

Legislative Aide 

House Republican Office 

2 State House Station 

Augusta, ME 04333-0002 

(207) 287-1440 

Kathleen. Rhoten@legislature.rnaine.gov

OEX Processing Information 

Processed Date: 

Processed By 

P0 Office 

Message count
PHILIP A. CURTIS 

IOU S L MAR) R JY IA DER 

[he Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590

STATE OF MAINE 

HOUSE OF REPRFSENI'ATIVES


HOUSE REPUBLICAN OFFICE


AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0002

(207) '57-140 

a x	

(207) 257H149 

f) C C U fl's 2 hot ma cow 

The Honorable Lisa Jackson 

Administrator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Secretary Lailood and Administrator Jackson: 

As the Majority Lmder of the Maine House of Representatives and a highway consultant, lam writing to 

you about the national fuel economy standards that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 

and Environmental Protection Agency are developing for 2017 to 2025. 

Serving in both positions provides ne with a clear understanding of the important role that transportation 

plays in Maine's economy. We are a rural state and rely a great deal on our cars and trucks to keep our 

families moving and businesses growing. Policies that make transportation more affordable - not more 

burdensome - are crucial to Maine ñimilies and businesses. This is especially true now as so many 

struggle to survive these tough economic times. 

As you focus the attention of your agencies on developing new fuel economy standards, please keep in 

mind the many Maine people who, along with millions of Americans, live in rural areas and depend on 

our vehicles to travel each and every day. I ask that you consider adopting a single, national fuel 

economy standard that allows us to meet our transportation needs without increasing costs and limiting 

choices for families and businesses. That would be good policy. 

I appreciate your time and attention to a matter that is crilical to our state 	affordable transportation. 

Sincerely 

4 

Philip A. curtis 

State Representative 

c: honorable Olympia J. Snowe 

Honorable Susan M. Collins 

Ilonorable Michael II. Michaud 

11onorable Chellie Pingree
#### § 188.1 Purpose.

This part implements policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures to be used by DoD personnel for the operation and management of the DoD ELAP.
#### § 37.920 What requirement for access to a nonprofit participant's records do I include in a TIA?

Your TIA must include for any nonprofit participant, including any FFRDC or GOCO administered by a nonprofit organization, the standard access-to-records requirement that subpart B of 2 CFR part 1136 specifies in Section F of OAR Article II (the standard wording for Section F of OAR Article II is provided in appendix B to 2 CFR part 1136).

[85 FR 51246, Aug. 19, 2020]
### §8912. Jurisdiction of courts

The district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, concurrent with the United States Court of Federal Claims, of a civil action or claim against the United States founded on this chapter.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 607; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §160(a)(3), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 48; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 3014. | Sept. 28, 1959, Pub. L. 86–382, §15, 73 Stat. 716. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 129 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 129

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
          Intelligence in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2023

 Mr. Turner submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
          Intelligence in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $17,200,000 for the One 
Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $8,200,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2023, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2024; and
            (2) not more than $9,000,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2024, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2025.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
§ 44.5 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)) adjudicates, before mobilization, conflicts the Ready Reserve screening process has identified, but has not resolved, between the mobilization manpower needs of the civilian sector and the Military Services.
( b ) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (ASD(M&RA)), under the USD(P&R), coordinates resolution of conflicts between the mobilization manpower needs of the civilian sector and the Military Services identified but not resolved through the Ready Reserve screening process.
( c ) The Secretaries of the Military Departments and Commandant, United States Coast Guard, ensure coordination with the ASD(M&RA) to resolve conflicts (identified, but not resolved through the Ready Reserve screening process) between the mobilization manpower needs of the civilian sector and the military. They will review petitions submitted by employers, take applicable action, and promptly transmit the results of that determination to the reservist concerned and their employer after making a determination in response to the petition. Materials provided or produced with regard to the petition will be retained by the Secretary Concerned.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-41458

Summary Calendar

 

CLIFTON DALE PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GERALD GARRETT,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CV-226

--------------------

October 24, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clifton Dale Phillips, Texas prisoner # 601560, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

action against Gerald Garrett as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Phillips argues that the district court

erred in dismissing his § 1983 action as not timely filed within

the applicable two-year limitations period. He argues that his

complaint filed on September 28, 1999, was timely filed within

two years of two incidents in 1998 and 1999 in which the Parole

Board considered an offense of which he was acquitted. He argues
No. 99-41458 

-2-

that the Parole Board’s consideration of the offense of which he

was acquitted violated his constitutional rights. Even if the

district court may have erred in dismissing Phillips’ § 1983

action as untimely, the district court’s judgment may be affirmed

on the alternative ground that Phillips’ allegations, that the

Parole Board considered unreliable or false information in making

a parole determination, do not state a federal constitutional

violation. See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 308-09 (5th

Cir. 1997); see also Sojourner T v. Edwards, 974 F.2d 27, 30 (5th

Cir. 1992) (court may affirm district court’s judgment on any

ground supported by the record).

Phillips has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. 

Because Phillips’ pleadings in the district court and on appeal

indicate that he is capable of representing himself adequately

and because this case does not present “exceptional

circumstances” warranting appointment of counsel, Phillips’

motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See Cooper v.

Sheriff, Lubbock County, Tex., 929 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir.

1991).

AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1293 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1293

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 12, 2024.
    Resolved, That Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, U.S. Department of 
Justice, shall be found to be in contempt of Congress for failure to comply with 
a congressional subpoena.
    Resolved, That pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  192 and 194, the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives shall certify the report of the Oversight 
Committee, detailing the refusal of Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, U.S. 
Department of Justice, to produce documents, records, and materials to the 
Oversight Committee as directed by subpoena, to the United States Attorney for 
the District of Columbia, to the end that Attorney General Merrick B. Garland be 
proceeded against in the manner and form provided by law.
    Resolved,  That the Speaker of the House shall otherwise take all 
appropriate action to enforce the subpoena.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 18.1





EXHIBIT TO THE SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 FORM 10-Q OF


DYNAMICS RESEARCH CORPORATION





November 3, 2010





Board of Directors


Dynamics Research Corporation


Two Tech Drive


Andover, MA 01810





Dear Directors:





We are providing this letter solely for inclusion as an exhibit to Dynamics Research Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company") Form 10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.





As stated in Note 5 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, the Company changed the date of its annual goodwill impairment test from December 31 to November 30. Note 5 also states management’s belief that the change in accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it better aligns the timing of the Company’s long-range planning with this test and allows them more time to accurately complete the impairment testing process prior to its yearend close.





With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, it should be understood that authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another acceptable method and, in expressing our concurrence below, we have relied on management’s business planning and judgment and on management’s determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable.





Based on our reading of management’s stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Company’s circumstances.





We have not audited the application of the aforementioned accounting change to the financial statements included in Part I of the Company’s Form 10-Q. We also have not audited any consolidated financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2009. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on whether the accounting for the change in accounting principle has been properly applied or whether the aforementioned financial statements are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America





Very truly yours,





/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 85658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28739]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3538-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Louisiana (FEMA-3538-EM), dated August 23, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 11, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective August 27, 2020.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-28739 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
| (a)   | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 3, 2008, which      accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended July 29, 2007, which accompanies this certification, fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operation of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and  Subsidiaries. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §590. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Assistant Secretary

The term "Assistant Secretary" means the Assistant Secretary for the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office.

#### (2) Intelligence community

The term "intelligence community" has the meaning given such term in section 3003(4) of title 50.

#### (3) Office

The term "Office" means the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office established under section 591(a) of this title.

#### (4) Weapon of mass destruction

The term "weapon of mass destruction" has the meaning given the term in section 1801 of title 50.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XIX, §1900, as added Pub. L. 115–387, §2(a)(2), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5162.)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1357 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1357

Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is 
 in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain 
                               subpoena.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2024

Mrs. Luna submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is 
 in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain 
                               subpoena.

Whereas, on February 27, 2024, Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United 
        States, was duly served with a subpoena to produce a narrow and specific 
        set of materials possessed by the Department of Justice and related to 
        Special Counsel Robert K. Hur's investigation of President Joe Biden's 
        ``willful'' mishandling of classified documents to the Committee on the 
        Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Oversight 
        and Accountability of the House of Representatives in Washington, DC;
Whereas Attorney General Garland has, in disobedience of such subpoena, failed 
        to produce the set of materials; and
Whereas the set of materials possessed by the Department of Justice is material 
        and necessary in order that the House of Representatives may properly 
        execute the functions imposed on it and may obtain information necessary 
        as a basis for such legislative and other action as the House of 
        Representatives may deem necessary and proper: Now, therefore be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, 
        is found in contempt of the House of Representatives for 
        disobeying the February 27, 2024, subpoena; and
            (2) the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall 
        impose a fine, which may not be paid with appropriated funds, 
        on Attorney General Garland of $10,000 per day, until such time 
        as Attorney General Garland complies with the subpoena of the 
        House of Representatives by turning over the audio tapes.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 24, 2014

t0616 

# Order

Clerk June 24, 2014

148640 & (17)(18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148640

COA: 319064

Wayne CC: 94

- 010112

- FC

L. C. BROWN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). T he

motion to remand and the motion to correct sentence are DENIED.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—DATA REQUESTS