alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.2





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Hurco Companies, Inc. on Form S-3 (No. 333-144510) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-48204
and 333-149809) of our report dated January 12, 2009 on the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule as of October 31, 2008 and
for the years ended October 31, 2008 and 2007 which appears in this Form 10-K of
Hurco Companies, Inc.





/s/Crowe
Horwath LLP





Indianapolis,
Indiana


January
12, 2010
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________ 

No. 19-2235

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Christopher Williams

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ 

Submitted: May 6, 2022

 Filed: May 13, 2022 

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before SMITH, Chief Judge, BENTON and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________ 

PER CURIAM.

Christopher R. Williams pled guilty, without a plea agreement, to possessing 

a firearm as a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The 

district court sentenced him to 190 months in prison pursuant to the Armed Career 

Criminal Act (ACCA). He appealed, among other things, the ACCA sentence, 

arguing he did not have at least three prior convictions for a serious drug offense, 

which were committed on different occasions. This court affirmed the ACCA 
-2- 

sentence. See United States v. Williams, 976 F.3d 781, 787 (8th Cir. 2020). 

Williams sought certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court 

vacated the judgment of this court and remanded “for further consideration in light 

of Wooden v. United States.” Williams v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 1439, 1439

(2022), citing Wooden v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 1063 (2022) (holding that the 

defendant’s prior convictions for burglary were not offenses committed on different 

occasions within the meaning of the ACCA). Considering Wooden v. United States, 

this court remands to the district court for a new factual determination on the issue 

of whether Williams had three prior convictions committed on different occasions. 

* * * * * * * *

The judgment of the district court is vacated, and the case remanded for 

further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information restating the financial
statements previously filed on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001060515
<NAME> PARAGON CORPORATE HOLDINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,523
<SECURITIES>                                    17,637
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,593
<INVENTORY>                                     48,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,290
<PP&E>                                          25,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,165
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,340)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,063
<SALES>                                        125,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,318
<CGS>                                           91,783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,893
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,755)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,488
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                            183
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                     368
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   36
<PP&E>                         49,659
<DEPRECIATION>                (32,240)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 17,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,406
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                       (100)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   18,006
<SALES>                         4,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,507
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (1,061)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                   (1,061)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (892)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (892)<F2>
<FN>
<F1> Partner equity - 1,190 Partnership units outstanding.
<F2> Per Partnership Unit in thousands.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's SEC Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           21497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   443404
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4328
<INVENTORY>                                     685296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1198497
<PP&E>                                         1377400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  651430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2365480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           648700
<BONDS>                                         702740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         63421
<OTHER-SE>                                      873584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2365480
<SALES>                                         889473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                889473
<CGS>                                           671065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   158669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   576
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  49357
<INCOME-TAX>                                     16790
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              32567
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     32567
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Zvi Slovin, Co-Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: April 13, 2010

/s/ Zvi SlovinZvi SlovinCo-Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
### §5705. Advancements and deductions

An agency may advance, through the proper disbursing official, to an employee entitled to per diem or mileage allowances under this subchapter, a sum considered advisable with regard to the character and probable duration of the travel to be performed. A sum advanced and not used for allowable travel expenses is recoverable from the employee or his estate by—

(1) setoff against accrued pay, retirement credit, or other amount due the employee;

(2) deduction from an amount due from the United States; and

(3) such other method as is provided by law.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 500; Pub. L. 94–22, §2(b), May 19, 1975, 89 Stat. 84.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 838. | June 9, 1949, ch. 185, §5, 63 Stat. 166. |

Statutes at Large

The words "disbursing official" are substituted for "disbursing officer" because of the definition of "officer" in section 2104 which excludes a member of a uniformed service. Application to section 5703 is based on former section 73b–2, which is carried into section 5703.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1975—Pub. L. 94–22 struck out "or individual" after "employee" wherever appearing.
### §488i. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary—

(1) $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and

(2) $10,750,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2012.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §899J, as added Pub. L. 110–161, div. E, title V, §563(a), Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2090.)
#### § 37.1205 Advance.

A payment made to a recipient before the recipient disburses the funds for program purposes. Advance payments may be based upon recipients' requests or predetermined payment schedules.
### §677. Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) the purpose of this part is to authorize the Secretary to declare that a significant incident has occurred and to establish the authorities that are provided under the declaration to respond to and recover from the significant incident; and

(2) the authorities established under this part are intended to enable the Secretary to provide voluntary assistance to non-Federal entities impacted by a significant incident.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XXII, §2231, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. G, title VI, §70602(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1267.)
Stack Testing during 2005, 2008, 2010 and 2011

This was compiled from confidential testing submitted to EPA Region 7 by Certainteed. 

 This spreadsheet does not contain CBI.

The permitted production rate of the K2 furnace is 158952.9 tons per year

The following chromium emissions were determined based on measured emissions of chromium

on a pounds per ton glass melted, at the permitted production rate (158952.9 tons per year)

Year Month

Test 

Method Analyte

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Chromium Emissions at permitted 

production rate, pounds per year

2011 Sept 61 Cr (VI) 7.49E-05 12

2010 Nov 61 Cr (VI) 3.20E-03 509

2010 Nov 29 Cr 3.50E-03 556

2008 Nov 29 Cr 1.17E-03 186

2005 Nov 29 Cr 5.31E-05 8

Certainteed Chromium Emission Testing on the K2 Furnace
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Great Sand Dunes
National Park & PreserveColorado
#### § 905.955 Certification of blasters.

Part 955 of this chapter, Certification of Blasters in Federal Program States and on Indian Lands, shall apply to the training, examination and certification of blasters for surface coal mining operations.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7432** 

FRANKLIN CHARLES SMITH , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

– Appellee, and
KENNETH STOLLE, Virginia Beach Sheriff , Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:13

- cv - 00479

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : December 21, 2015 Decided: January 5, 2016

Before MOTZ and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS , Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Franklin Charles Smith , Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, Senior Assistant Attorney General , Richmond, Vir ginia, for Appellee
.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Franklin Charles Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability . 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sat isfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Smith’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Smith’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and4 legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1385 

Designating the week of August 4 through August 10, 2024, as ‘‘National 

Farmers Market Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2024 

Mr. VALADAO (for himself and Ms. PINGREE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of August 4 through August 10, 2024, 

as ‘‘National Farmers Market Week’’. 

Whereas farmers markets accounted for $1,700,000,000 in 

income for farmers of the United States in 2020, demonstrating the crucial role of farmers markets in local 

economies; 

Whereas, according to the Agricultural Marketing Service of 

the Department of Agriculture, the number of farmers 

markets in the United States rose from 1,755 in 1994 

to 8,771 in 2019, an average growth of nearly 7 percent 

per year; 

Whereas farmers markets serve as significant educational 

sites and as bridges between urban and rural communities, contributing to a better public understanding of 

farming and ranching; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1385 IH 

Whereas the adoption of more sustainable farming practices 

is closely associated with farmer-to-consumer interactions 

facilitated by farmers markets; 

Whereas farmers markets and direct marketing farmers help 

improve the health and wellness of low-income people in 

the United States who receive Federal nutrition benefits; 

Whereas National Farmers Market Week is a time to recognize the unique and indispensable role farmers markets 

play in supporting food access, bolstering local economies, 

promoting healthy communities, and fostering sustainable 

farming; and 

Whereas the establishment of August 4 through August 10, 

2024, as ‘‘National Farmers Market Week’’ would raise 

awareness for these important markets: Now, therefore 

be it 

1 Resolved, That Congress— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National 

3 Farmers Market Week’’; and 

4 (2) recognizes the vital role that farmers mar5 kets play in bringing communities together and in 

6 supporting the livelihoods of millions of people in the 

7 United States, from farmers and food producers to 

8 consumers. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 920.20 Approval of Maryland abandoned mine plan. The Maryland Abandoned Mine Plan, as submitted on March 8, 1982, is approved. Copies of the approved program are available at the following locations: ( a ) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Harrisburg Field Office, Harrisburg Transportation Center, Third Floor, Suite 3C, Fourth and Market Streets, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101.
( b ) Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Administration, Bureau of Mines, 160 South Water Street, Frostburg, Maryland 21532.
[59 FR 17929, Apr. 15, 1994]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                          12,449 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  290,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    188,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               500,378      
<PP&E>                                         192,973     
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,254   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 667,886     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          239,442   
<BONDS>                                        135,520 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           334
<OTHER-SE>                                     283,319      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   667,886        
<SALES>                                      1,181,037         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,181,037         
<CGS>                                          906,779         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  906,779         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               250,286      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,967      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,005      
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,909     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,352     
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,352<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        
                                  
<FN> 
<F1>  The Company recognized minority interest expense in the amount of
      $2,744,000 in the consolidated statement of operations, which represents
      the minority shareholders' portion of the income for less than wholly-
      owned subsidiaries. The minority interest share of the net assets of these
      subsidiaries of $2,343,000 as of May 3, 1997 is included in other
      liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet of the Company.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of Sasol Limited (Sasol) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management is required to assess the effectiveness of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether the Company's internal control over financial reporting is
effective.

Sasol's
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide
reasonable assurance as to the reliability of Sasol's financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorisations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management
assessed the effectiveness of Sasol's internal control over financial reporting as of 30 June 2015. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in "Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013)". Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of
30 June 2015, Sasol's internal control over financial reporting was effective.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.,
an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an opinion on the effectiveness of Sasol's internal control over financial reporting as
stated in their report which appears herein.

Date: 9 October 2015By:

/s/ DAVID EDWARD CONSTABLEDavid Edward Constable President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: 9 October 2015By:

/s/ BONGANI NQWABABABongani Nqwababa Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks