alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Newcastle

Yellowstone

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse RMP

Amendments Planning Area

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

RMP Amendments Planning Area

Private and State Mineral Ownership

Federal Mineral Ownership

Leased Federal Minerals

Field Office Boundaries

Counties

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 4: Federal Mineral Estate

and Existing Oil and Gas Leases
Exhibit 10.2



                          SETTLEMENT & WAIVER AGREEMENT

         THIS SETTLEMENT & WAIVER AGREEMENT ("Agreement"),  by and between Omega
Holdings,  Bahamas, Ltd., 201 Saffrey Square, P.O. Box N303, Bay Street and Bank
Lane,  Nassau,  Bahamas  ("Omega"),  and Light Management Group,  Inc., a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Company"),  (hereinafter  collectively  referred  to as  the
"Parties"),  is entered into this 1st day of March 2001, to settle the Company's
$1.6 million debt to Omega.

                                    RECITALS

         A.  Omega  paid  approximately  $1.6  million  to satisfy a debt of the
Company on or before September 1, 2000 (the "Debt");

         B. The  Company  desires  to settle  the Debt owed to Omega by  issuing
Omega shares of the Company's common stock.

         C. Based on recent  financing  attempts,  during which potential equity
investors  have noted resale  restrictions  and the OTC-BB listing and therefore
demanded 40-50% discounts to the prevailing market price of the Company's common
stock,  the board of directors  believes it to be in the Company's best interest
to discount the  prevailing  price of the Company's  common  stock,  which as of
February  28,  2001  closed  at $1.50,  by  42.5%.  Such  discount  reduces  the
applicable  price to be utilized in computing  the number of shares  required to
satisfy the Debt to $0.8625 per share,  thus requiring the issuance of 1,855,072
shares of the Company's common stock to resolve the Company Debt.

                                    AGREEMENT

         NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing premises, which are incorporated
herein by this reference,  and for and in  consideration of the mutual covenants
and agreements  contained  herein,  and in reliance on the  representations  and
warranties  set forth in this  Agreement,  the benefits to be derived herein and
for other valuable  consideration,  the sufficiency of which is hereby expressly
acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

         1. The Company hereby agrees to repay the Debt by  immediately  issuing
Omega One Million  Eight Hundred  Fifty-five  Thousand  Seventy-two  (1,855,072)
shares of Common Stock (the "Common Shares").

         2. Omega agrees to waive and fully discharge the Debt upon the issuance
of the Common Shares in Omega's name.

         3. Omega and the Company  agree that the execution of the above actions
will cancel the Debt as heretofore is owed by the Company to Omega.


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the signatures below hereby evidence the Parties
execution of and satisfaction with this Settlement Agreement.

Light Management Group, Inc.                     Omega Holdings, Bahamas, Ltd.


/s/ Donald Iwacha                                /s/ Cristina Santos
------------------------------                   -------------------------------
Dr. Donald Iwacha, President                     Cristina Santos, Directors
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14014-14015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5619]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-03]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: OCC--250 E Street SW., Room 8C, Washington, DC 20219.
    Date: March 14, 2012.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.
    Matters To Be Considered:
    Summary Agenda:

February 8, 2012 minutes--Open Session.

(No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)
    Discussion Agenda:

[[Page 14015]]

Appraisal Foundation September-November 2011 Grant Reimbursement 
Requests
Revised ASC Delegations of Authority
Hawaii Compliance Review
Montana Compliance Review
Nebraska Compliance Review
New Mexico Compliance Review
New York Compliance Review
Wisconsin Compliance Review

    How to Attend and Observe an ASC meeting: Email your name, 
organization and contact information to meetings@asc.gov. You may also 
send a written request via U.S. Mail, fax or commercial carrier to the 
Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H Street NW., Ste 760, Washington, 
DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-4101. Your request must be received 
no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the Monday prior to the meeting. 
Attendees must have a valid government-issued photo ID and must agree 
to submit to reasonable security measures. The meeting space is 
intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will 
not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: March 2, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-5619 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
### SUBCHAPTER III—RURAL ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of NOXSO Corporation. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
J. Anderson, principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard J. Anderson
-----------------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
July 14, 2003
First Amendment to First amended and Restated Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.11 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, made as of the 1st day of January 2005, by and between
COMMONWEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Virginia corporation (the “Employer”), and JAMES H. BRENNAN (the “Officer”). 
 WHEREAS, the Employer and the Officer previously entered into a First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2005 (the “Initial Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Initial Agreement contained an equation to determine certain performance-based cash, restricted stock and incentive option bonuses;
and 
 WHEREAS, the Employer and the Officer wish to amend the Initial Agreement to correct a mathematical error contained therein.

 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto,
the Employer and the Executive hereby amend the Initial Agreement as follows: 
 1. The equation contained in Section 3(c) is hereby
removed in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “A + (A * (1-B)) = C” 
 2. All other portions of the Initial Agreement remain in effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed as a sealed instrument by the Employer, by its duly authorized officer, and by the Executive, as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	 COMMONWEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Richard J. Freer, Ph.D.
	 Name:
	 	Richard J. Freer, Ph.D.
	 Title:
	 	Chairman and Chief Operating Officer
		
	 Date:
	 	7/1/06
		
		 	/s/ James H. Brennan
		 	James H. Brennan
		
	 Address:
	 	601 Biotech Drive             
		 	Richmond, Virginia 23235
		
	 Date:
	 	2/1/06
### §8506. Dissemination of information

(a) Each agency of the United States and each wholly or partially owned instrumentality of the United States shall make available to State agencies which have agreements under this subchapter, or to the Secretary of Labor, as the case may be, such information concerning the Federal service and Federal wages of a Federal employee as the Secretary considers practicable and necessary for the determination of the entitlement of the Federal employee to compensation under this subchapter. The information shall include the findings of the employing agency concerning—

(1) whether or not the Federal employee has performed Federal service;

(2) the periods of Federal service;

(3) the amount of Federal wages; and

(4) the reasons for termination of Federal service.

The employing agency shall make the findings in the form and manner prescribed by regulations of the Secretary. The regulations shall include provision for correction by the employing agency of errors and omissions. This subsection does not apply with respect to Federal service and Federal wages covered by subchapter II of this chapter.

(b) The agency administering the unemployment compensation law of a State shall furnish the Secretary such information as he considers necessary or appropriate in carrying out this subchapter. The information is deemed the report required by the Secretary for the purpose of section 503(a)(6) of title 42.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 589; Pub. L. 94–566, title III, §313(a), Oct. 20, 1976, 90 Stat. 2680.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 42 U.S.C. 1367. | Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1212, §4(a) "Sec. 1507", 68 Stat. 1134. |
| | | Aug. 28, 1958, Pub. L. 85–848, §4, 72 Stat. 1089. |
| | | Sept. 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–778, §531(f), 74 Stat. 984. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–566 struck out provision that findings made in accordance with the Secretary's regulations were final and conclusive for the purpose of sections 8502(d) and 8503(c) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Pub. L. 94–566, title III, §313(b), Oct. 20, 1976, 90 Stat. 2680, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to findings made after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 20, 1976]."
### §3227c. Continued applicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act to the Board of Visitors

The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) 1 shall continue to apply to the Board of Visitors of the National Intelligence University on and after the transfer date.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title X, §1034, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. W, title III, §305(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2367.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Advisory Committee Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 92–463, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 770, which was set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, and was substantially repealed and restated in chapter 10 (§1001 et seq.) of Title 5 by Pub. L. 117–286, §§3(a), 7, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4197, 4361. For disposition of sections of the Act into chapter 10 of Title 5, see Disposition Table preceding section 101 of Title 5.

1 See References in Text note below.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-1068

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM073AD

737-57A1271, R2 --- 1/17/11

737-57A1271, R1 --- 7/30/08

737-57A1271 --- 9/11/03

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
March 24, 1977.

M. P. No. 76-441.

#### Narragansett Electric Company *v.*Edward F. Burke *et al.*

*Julius C. Michael-son,*Attorney General, *R. Daniel Prentiss,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for Public Utilities Commission.

*Dennis J. Roberts II, Roberts Sc, Willey,*for Rhode Island Consumers’ Council.

*John F. Sherlock, Jr.,*for The Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce.

*John M. Mola, Rhode Island Legal Services, Inc.,*for Coalition for Consumer Justice.

Petitioner’s motion to remand this case to the Public Utilities Commission is assigned to the calendar for April 7, 1977, 9:30 a.m. for oral argument.
#### B. W. Dyer & Co., v. Monitz, Wallack & Colodney. Skrod *&*Co., Inc. v. Monitz, Wallack & Colodney.

Motion by appellants for reargument of appeal or for a modification of this court’s decision denied. The trial court, upon sufficient evidence, found that the particular item of $23,000 was “subsequently reduced to $6,500 by repayments totaling $9,000 received from Skrod & Company and a retransfer of $7,500 from the futures into the pledge account.” Cross motion by defendant-respondent for rehearing of appeal or, in the alternative, for the withdrawing of this court’s decision and, in lieu thereof, the directing of an affirmance of judgment below, denied. It is clear that defendant Monitz, Wallack & Colodney was not a pledgee in good faith and for value with respect to the item of $23,000 (reduced to $6,500). In addition to what was said in this court’s memorandum opinion, it is to be noted that, at time of transfer of this sum to the futures trading account of Skrod, substantial losses were being sustained in connection with such account; and a member of defendant’s firm testified that transfers were made from corporate accounts to Skrod’s personal or futures accounts when the latter were short. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
### §302108. Review of threats to historic property

At least once every 4 years, the Secretary, in consultation with the Council and with State Historic Preservation Officers, shall review significant threats to historic property to—

(1) determine the kinds of historic property that may be threatened;

(2) ascertain the causes of the threats; and

(3) develop and submit to the President and Congress recommendations for appropriate action.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3194.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302108 | 16 U.S.C. 470a(a)(8). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §101(a)(8), as added Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4003, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4753. |

Section
#### THURN v. WILLIAMS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Master and Servant—Negligence—Respondeat Superior.

Defendant, while driving his own horse and a wagon borrowed from his codefendant, negligently collided with plaintiff's horse and wagon. At the time, defendant was not in the employment of the codefendant, but was driving on his own account. *Melé*not to show the relation of master and servant, and therefore the codefendant was not responsible for the accident, notwithstanding the evidence that the codefendant was defendant’s son-in-law; that, after the collision, defendant stated that the horse or wagon, or both, belonged to the codefendant; and that the codefendant, the day after the accident, said he was sorry that it had happened, and that he would settle it in a decent way.

Appeal from Municipal' Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District.

Action by Frank Thurn against James Williams, impleaded with Fred H. Pontin. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Williams appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

John Goode, for appellant.

Daniel M. Van Cott, for respondent.

MacLEAN, J.

In this action, to recover damages for negligently causing of a horse and damaging a wagon and harness, the property of the plaintiff, the liability of the defendant Williams rests, if at all, upon the rule of respondeat superior, for he was not personally present when the collision of the teams driven by the driver of the plaintiff and the defendant Pontin occurred. “But the doctrine of respondeat superior applies only when the relation of master and servant is shown to exist between the wrongdoer and the person sought to be charged for the result of the wrong at the time and in respect to very transaction out of which the injury arose.” Higgins v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 156 N. Y. 75, 78, 50 N. E. 500, 66 Am. St. Rep. 537. That the defendant Williams was the son-in-law of his codefendant, or that after the collision the latter stated that the horse or wagon, or both, belonged to his sonrin-law, or that the son-in-law, the day after the accident, said, “I am very sorry that it happened, and if he wouldn’t ask too much, I would settle it in a decent way,” even if in particular undenied, was clearly insufficient to bring him within the- application of the rule, in the face of the sworn testimony of the two defendants, not otherwise impeached or contradicted, that Pontin was the owner of the horse, had borrowed the wagon, and at the time of the accident was not in the employment of his son-in-law, but was driving on his own account, favoring another. The judgment against the defendant Williams must therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Judgment against defendant Williams reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

What are Virtual Currencies?

A digital representation of value that 

functions as a medium of exchange, a unit 

of account, and/or a store of value.

In some cases, you can spend it like money, 

but it does not have legal tender status in 

the United States.

Some virtual currencies have an equivalent 

value in other currencies, such as U.S. 

dollars or Euros, or can be traded for other 

virtual currencies. These are referred to as 

convertible virtual currencies. Bitcoin is an 

example of a convertible virtual currency.

When you buy or sell virtual currencies with 

dollars for your personal wallet, you are 

buying on the cash or spot market. Virtual 

currencies can also be purchased through 

initial coin offerings or ICOs.

CFTC

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

866-366-2382 (Consumer Hotline)

202-418-5514 (TTY)

consumers@cftc.gov

This brochure was prepared by the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission’s Office of Customer Education and Outreach. The 

brochure is provided for general informational purposes only 

and does not provide legal or investment advice to any 

individual or entity. Please consult with your own legal adviser 

before taking any action based on this information.

@CFTCgov @CFTC 

Learn more at www.cftc.gov/bitcoin
Virtual Currencies are Commodities

Virtual currencies have been determined to be 

commodities under the Commodity Exchange 

Act. While its regulatory oversight authority 

over commodity cash markets is limited, the U.S. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) 

maintains general anti-fraud and manipulation 

enforcement authority over virtual currency cash 

markets as a commodity in interstate commerce.

Risks Buying Virtual Currencies

Purchasing virtual currencies on the cash market

comes with a number of risks, including:

• Most cash markets are not regulated or

supervised by a government agency.

• Trading platforms may lack customer

protections or safeguards against market

manipulation.

• Extreme price volatility or “flash” crashes.

• Platforms selling from their own accounts and

putting customers at a disadvantage.

Beware of Fraud 

There may be no recourse if your virtual 

currency is stolen.

• Virtual currencies are commonly targeted by

hackers and fraudsters.

• Do not invest in products you do not

understand.

• There is no such thing as a guaranteed

investment or trading strategy.

• Some ICOs can be used to improperly entice

investors with promises of high returns.

• If someone says they are a broker or advisor,

check their registration at SmartCheck.gov.

Suspect Fraud? 

If you believe you may have been the victim of 

fraud, or to report suspicious activity, contact us at 

866.366.2382 or visit SmartCheck.gov/submitatip.

Keep a pulse on virtual currencies. 

Find podcasts, weekly reports, and tips for 

protecting yourself at www.cftc.gov/bitcoin.
### §1132. Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) 182 public transportation systems throughout the world have been primary targets of terrorist attacks;

(2) more than 6,000 public transportation agencies operate in the United States;

(3) people use public transportation vehicles 33,000,000 times each day;

(4) the Federal Transit Administration has invested $93,800,000,000 since 1992 for construction and improvements;

(5) the Federal investment in transit security has been insufficient; and

(6) greater Federal investment in transit security improvements per passenger boarding is necessary to better protect the American people, given transit's vital importance in creating mobility and promoting our Nation's economy.

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XIV, §1403, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 401.)