alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 234.19 Penalties and effect on other laws. ( a ) Whoever shall be found guilty of willfully violating any rule or regulation enumerated in this part is subject to the penalties imposed by Federal law for the commission of a Class B misdemeanor offense.
( b ) Whoever violates any rule or regulation enumerated in this part is liable to the United States for a civil penalty of not more than $1,000.
( c ) Nothing in this part shall be construed to abrogate any other Federal laws.
Map 3-13: Coal and Trona Leasing

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Active Coal Leases

Known Trona Leasing Area

Federal Mineral Estate

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
Exhibit 99.4  October 9, 2013  Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549  Ladies and Gentlemen:  We are currently principal accountants for Sasol Limited and, under the date of October 9, 2013, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of Sasol Limited as of and for the years ended June 30, 2013, June 30, 2012, and June 30, 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013.  On February 12, 2013, we were notified that the Sasol Limited audit committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. (PwC) as its principal accountant for the year ending June 30, 2014, their appointment being subject to approval by Sasol Limited shareholders at the companys annual general meeting scheduled for November 22, 2013. The auditor-client relationship with KPMG Inc. will cease following such approval/confirmation.  We have read Sasol Limiteds statements included under Item 16F of its Form 20-F dated October 9, 2013, and we agree with such statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with Sasol Limiteds statement that PwC were not engaged regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Sasol Limiteds consolidated financial statements.  Very truly yours,(signed) KPMG Inc.
**UNITEDSTATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION**

**Washington****, D.C.****  20549**

 

**FORM10-K**

(Mark One)

[X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thefiscal year ended December 31, 2008

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934

 

For thetransition period from __________ to __________

 

Commission file number0-09782

 

**REALESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED II**

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code (864) 239-1000

 

Securities registeredpursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

NONE

 

Securities registeredpursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Limited PartnershipInterests

(Titleof class)

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of theSecurities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days. Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark ifdisclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is notcontained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’sknowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated byreference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.[X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).Yes [ ] No [X]

 

State the aggregate marketvalue of the voting and non-voting partnership interests held by non-affiliatescomputed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were lastsold, or the average bid and asked prices of such partnership interests as ofthe last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscalquarter.  No market exists for the limited partnership interests of theRegistrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can bedetermined.

 

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE**

**None**
EXHIBIT 10.7

                      PRODUCT PURCHASE AND SALES AGREEMENT

Party A (hereinafter referred to as the "Biological"): Tianjin Tianshi
Biological Development Co., Ltd.

Party B (hereinafter referred to as the "Engineering"): Tianjin Tianshi
Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.

Biological and Engineering sign this agreement on a basis of equality and mutual
benefit.

1.   Biological agrees that Engineering sells Biological's products, and
     promises to supply required products to Engineering timely.

2.   Engineering provides its coming year's order plan to Biological by each
     December 25. Engineering is in charge of selling all of Biological's
     products domestically. Biological sells its products to Engineering at a
     price which is 25% of its domestic market's retail price.

3.   Biological promises that all the products sold shall be in accordance with
     the quality requirement of Engineering, and is responsible for any losses
     of Engineering resulted from quality problems.

4.   Engineering shall make payment for goods to Biological monthly. Any delay
     of payment for goods is prohibited.

5.   Both parties shall observe this agreement, and cooperate with each other if
     any dispute arises.

Party A:                                  Party B:
Tianjin Tianshi Biological Development    Tianjin Tianshi Biological Engineering
Co., Ltd.                                 Co., Ltd.

[COMPANY SEAL AFFIXED]                    [COMPANY SEAL AFFIXED]

June 25, 2003                             June 25, 2003
#### John S. Garrity, appellee, v. John W. Ford, Jr., and C. P. Bellock, trading as Ford, Bellock & Company, and Bernard G. Blanchard, appellants.

Gen. No. 29,217.

Action to recover money paid on contract for purchase of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. John D. Biggs, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1624.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

James B. MeKeon, for appellants Ford, Bellock & Co. Delbert A. Clithero, for appellant Bernard G. Blanchard.

O’Brien, Rutledge & Hayes, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §9808. Assignments of intergovernmental personnel

For purposes of applying the third sentence of section 3372(a) (relating to the authority of the head of a Federal agency to extend the period of an employee's assignment to or from a State or local government, institution of higher education, or other organization), the Administrator may, with the concurrence of the employee and the government or organization concerned, take any action which would be allowable if such sentence had been amended by striking "two" and inserting "four".

(Added Pub. L. 108–201, §3(a), Feb. 24, 2004, 118 Stat. 468.)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStraddle design of spiral bevel and hypoid pinions and gearsThe design of spiral bevel and hypoid gears that have a shaft extended from both sides of the cone apex (straddle design) is considered. A main difficulty of such a design is determining the length and diameter of the shaft that might be undercut by the head cutter during gear tooth generation. A method that determines the free space available for the gear shaft is proposed. The approach avoids collision between the shaft being designed and the head cutter during tooth generation. The approach is illustrated with a numerical example.Document ID19910005289Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLitvin, Faydor L.*(Illinois Univ. Chicago., United States)*Kuan, Chihping*(Illinois Univ. Chicago., United States)*Kieffer, Jonathan*(Illinois Univ. Chicago., United States)*Bossler, Robert*(Lucas Western, Inc., City of Industry CA., United States)*Handschuh, Robert F.*(Army Aviation Systems Command Cleveland, OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1990Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberL-5467NASA-TM-103621NAS 1.15:103621AVSCOM-TR-90-C-010Accession Number91N14602Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-51PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-62211-A-47-ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910005289.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED
HEREIN AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,544
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,051
<INVENTORY>                                     71,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,255
<PP&E>                                         495,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                 208,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 597,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,491
<BONDS>                                        175,404
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           203
<OTHER-SE>                                     264,396
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   597,917
<SALES>                                      1,053,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,053,272
<CGS>                                          860,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  860,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   504
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,666
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,056
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.12


</TABLE>
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1450
PLATE 2

FREMONT CASPER MOUNTAIN CASPER MOUNTAIN BANNER STEEPLE BOX ELDER
CANYON ROAD B TV TOWER MOUNTAIN PASTURE CANYON
Secs. 15, 16, 21, Sec. 8, Secs. 8, 9, Sec. 2, Sec. 11, Sec. 13
T. 29N., T. 32 N., T.32N., T. 31N., T.31N., T. 32N.,
R. 83 W. R.79 W. R. 79 W. R.77 W. R.77 W. R.75 W.
b < 30 mi > p< 05> fe 45 mi >+ 1 mite 14 mi >|—____|
METERS FEET
90
a)
]
6 ia 1-70
WwW
w BIG GOOSE
6 MEMBER 2-4
n
a
=i
S
z + 60
a
>] 10
=
: a)
9 9
B CK (e506 MISSISSIPPIAN ||
bet Cs Ts 6 sie wm ws 0 eee
8z/7 7
6c DEVONIAN 6 C-D (26036)
55
ws|6
BE L- 40
ge
5
-— _ 104
z ee
2 —_ 1-30
Zela 5
6
Ba
OZ
SG
a
f
PRECAMBRIAN L_ 90
GRANITE
EXPLANATION
LOCATIONS OF STRATIGRAPHIC SECTIONS ARE SHOWN IN FIGURE 2. CONODONT FAUNAS ARE LISTED IN TABLES 2 AND 3
LITHOLOGY
i 7 Dolomicrite (dolomitic limestone) Quartz siltstone ig
|
Dolomicrite (dolomite) Quartz sandstone
Dolomicrite, sandy (dolomitic limestone) Quartz sandstone, conglomeratic
o—-o
"| Dolomicrite, sandy (dolomite) S11 Granite
“ OTHER
reer ape j
Dolobiomicrite, crinoi BEDDING Unit number in measured section
| Chert, nodular, lenticular, irregular Regular Platy
| peat USGS conodont sample and age:
D, Devonian; K, Kinderhookian
Clay shale, silty [I imegular |__—~}_Crossbedded
a - —~-.-_ Formation contact, wavy where unconformable
#6 © © © © © © Disconformable Devonian-Mississippian boundary

BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF ENGLEWOOD FORMATION AND ADJACENT ROCKS IN STUDY AREA
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant
To 18 U.S.C. 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William R. Maris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Date: June 26, 2008 |  | /s/ William R. MarisWilliam R. Maris Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Cascades Volcano Observatory

#### U.S. Geological Survey  General Information Product 64 version 1.0

# Geologic Hazards at Volcanoes

### *By*Bobbie Myers and Carolyn Driedger

### 2008

Most volcano hazards are associated with eruptions.  However, some hazards, such as lahars and debris avalanches, can occur even when a volcano is not erupting.

----

Download this report as an 18" x 27" PDF file (gip64.pdf; 140 kB)

For questions about this report, contact Carolyn Driedger.

Suggested citation and version history

----

| Help | Publications main page | Western General Information Products |  | Geology | Volcano Hazards Program |

----

This report is also available in print from:

USGS Information Services, Box 25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225telephone: 888 ASK-USGS; e-mail: infoservices@usgs.gov

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/64/ Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles Page Last Modified: June 9, 2008 (mfd)
### **CHAPTER 7B—PLANT PESTS**
### §1005. Responsibilities of the President

(a) Delegation.—The President may delegate responsibility for evaluating and taking action, where appropriate, with respect to all public recommendations made to the President by Presidential advisory committees.

(b) Report on Response to Recommendations.—Within 1 year after a Presidential advisory committee submits a public report to the President, the President or the President's delegate shall submit to Congress a report stating either proposals for action or reasons for inaction, with respect to the recommendations contained in the public report.

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(a), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4199.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1005 | 5 U.S.C. App. (FACA §6(a), (b)) | Pub. L. 92–463, §6(a), (b), Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 772. |

Section
### §5356. Appropriations

Funds appropriated to an agency for expenses of its hospitals, clinics, and laboratories to which student-employees are assigned or attached are available to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 472.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 1058. | Aug. 4, 1947, ch. 452, §9, 61 Stat. 728. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20732

Summary Calendar

STEPHEN PAUL SHARP, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

STEPHEN PAUL SHARP,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NOBLE DRILLING CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Defendants,

NOBLE DRILLING CORPORATION; NOBLE DRILLING

(U.S.), INC.; NOBLE DRILLING SERVICES CORPORATION; NOBLE DRILLING (U.S.), INC.; NOBLE DRILLING (WEST AFRICA), INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(CA H 95-5215)

February 18, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
 

1Noble Drilling (U.S.), Inc.; Noble Drilling Services Corporation; Noble Drilling (West

Africa), Inc.

 

2Conoco International, Inc. and Conoco Energy (Nigeria), Ltd.

 

3Chevron International Oil Company, Inc. and Chevron International (Nigeria), Ltd.

2

Stephen Paul Sharp appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment

in favor of Noble Drilling Corporation and affiliates.1 Finding the appeal to be

interlocutory, we dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

Sharp filed a complaint against (1) Noble, (2) Conoco, Inc. and affiliates,2

and (3) Chevron, Inc. and affiliates.3 Sharp advanced negligence, wrongful death,

and survivorship claims against Conoco and Chevron and wrongful death and

survivorship actions under the Jones Act against Noble. The district court granted

Noble’s motion for summary judgment. Subsequently Sharp moved to non-suit

Conoco and Chevron, and Conoco filed a motion for summary judgment. The

district court denied both motions. Sharp and Chevron then reached a settlement

agreement, and Sharp’s claims against Conoco are setfortrial beginning March 28,

1997.

A district court may attest to finality and thus qualify for appeal a judgment

that partially disposes of multiple claims or parties “only upon an express

determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction
 

4Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); see Bader v. Atlantic Intn’l, Ltd., 986 F.2d 912 (5th Cir. 1993).

3

for the entry of judgment.”4 In the case at bar the district court entered summary

judgment in favor of Noble but the claims against Conoco remain. Before us,

therefore, is a partial disposition of a multiparty action. The judgment contains no

Rule 54(b) attestation by the district court. We lack appellate jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

d0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141466(21) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141466 

 COA: 297404 

Oakland CC: 2008-219261-FH 

RONNIE WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 

22, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
EXHIBIT 32.1


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), We, Craig T Dunham, President and Chief Executive Officer of The
Company and Laura Lunardo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
        of The Company.



                                /s/ Craig T Dunham
                              -------------------
                              Craig T Dunham
                              President and Chief Executive
                              Officer


                                /s/ Laura Lunardo
                              -------------------
                              Laura Lunardo
                              Chief Financial Officer

February 14, 2007
#### § 925.1 Scope.

This part contains all rules applicable only within Missouri that have been adopted under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.

[45 FR 77027, Nov. 21, 1980]
§ 37.1370 Termination. The cancellation of a TIA, in whole or in part, at any time prior to either: ( a ) The date on which all work under the TIA is completed; or
( b ) The date on which Federal sponsorship ends, as given in the award document or any supplement or amendment thereto.