alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2751. Transfer of weapons activities funds

#### (a) Transfer authority for weapons activities funds

The Secretary of Energy shall provide the manager of each field office of the Department of Energy with the authority to transfer weapons activities funds from a program or project under the jurisdiction of that office to another such program or project.

#### (b) Limitations

#### (1) Number of transfers

Not more than one transfer may be made to or from any program or project under subsection (a) in a fiscal year.

#### (2) Amounts transferred

The amount transferred to or from a program or project in any one transfer under subsection (a) may not exceed $5,000,000.

#### (3) Determination required

A transfer may not be carried out by a manager of a field office under subsection (a) unless the manager determines that the transfer—

(A) is necessary to address a risk to health, safety, or the environment; or

(B) will result in cost savings and efficiencies.

#### (4) Limitation

A transfer may not be carried out by a manager of a field office under subsection (a) to cover a cost overrun or scheduling delay for any program or project.

#### (5) Impermissible uses

Funds transferred pursuant to subsection (a) may not be used for an item for which Congress has specifically denied funds or for a new program or project that has not been authorized by Congress.

#### (c) Exemption from reprogramming requirements

The requirements of section 2742 of this title shall not apply to transfers of funds pursuant to subsection (a).

#### (d) Notification

The Secretary, acting through the Administrator, shall notify Congress of any transfer of funds pursuant to subsection (a) not later than 30 days after such transfer occurs.

#### (e) Definitions

In this section:

(1) The term "program or project" means, with respect to a field office of the Department of Energy, a program or project that is for weapons activities necessary for national security programs of the Department, that is being carried out by that office, and for which weapons activities funds have been authorized and appropriated.

(2) The term "weapons activities funds" means funds appropriated to the Department of Energy pursuant to an authorization for carrying out weapons activities necessary for national security programs.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVII, §4711, formerly div. C, title XXXVI, §3630, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2761; renumbered div. D, title XLVII, §4711, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(j)(2)(A)–(C), (D)(v), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1781; Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(h)(3), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1081.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 7386j of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 108–136.

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 113–66 struck out "for Nuclear Security" after "Administrator".

2003—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–136, §3141(j)(2)(D)(v), made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 2742 of this title.
Clinical Guide > Testing and Assessment

# Guide for HIV/AIDS Clinical CareSection 2: Testing and Assessment- Initial History
- Initial Physical Examination
- Initial and Interim Laboratory and Other Tests
- Interim History and Physical Examination
- HIV Classification: CDC and WHO Staging Systems
- CD4 and Viral Load Monitoring
- Risk of HIV Progression/Indications for ART
- Primary HIV Infection
- Rapid HIV Testing
- Resistance Testing
- Karnofsky Performance Scale
#### Harry Nelson, Respondent, v. Sindos Realty Corp., Defendant, and North Shore Electric, Inc., Appellant.

Order, entered on March 7, 1963, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. No excuse for the delay of 18 months after the last pretrial proceedings was offered. Plaintiff’s offer to consent to a transfer of the ease to the Civil Court constitutes no excuse for a failure to proceed. Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### State Division of Human Rights, Respondent, v Stromberg Carlson Corporation, Petitioner, and I. U. E., Local No. 338, Respondent.

Determination unanimously reversed insofar as it awarded damages and otherwise confirmed, without costs, and matter remitted to State Division of Human Rights for further proceedings in accordance with memorandum in *SDHR (Truitt) v Stromberg Carlson Corp.*(66 AD2d 990). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present-Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Hancock, Jr., JJ.
### §105. Biodefense analysis and budget submission

#### (a) Annual analysis

For each fiscal year, beginning in fiscal year 2023, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall—

(1) conduct a detailed and comprehensive analysis of Federal biodefense programs; and

(2) develop an integrated biodefense budget submission.

#### (b) Definition of biodefense

In accordance with the National Biodefense Strategy, the Director shall develop and disseminate to all Federal departments and agencies a unified definition of the term "biodefense" to identify which programs and activities are included in the annual budget submission required under subsection (a).

#### (c) Requirements for analysis

The analysis required under subsection (a) shall include—

(1) the display of all funds requested for biodefense activities, both mandatory and discretionary, by agency and categorized by biodefense enterprise element, such as threat awareness, prevention, deterrence, preparedness, surveillance and detection, response, attribution (including bioforensic capabilities), recovery, and mitigation; and

(2) detailed explanations of how each program and activity included aligns with biodefense goals and objectives as part of the National Biodefense Strategy required under section 104 of this title.

#### (d) Submittal to Congress

The Director, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall submit to Congress the analysis required under subsection (a) for a fiscal year concurrently with the President's annual budget request for that fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title III, §363, Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3547.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, and not as part of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 which comprises this chapter.
#### § 764.10 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in §§ 764.21 and 764.25(b) have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3507 and assigned clearance number 1029-0030. The information required in § 764.21 is necessary to allow the regulatory authority to develop a data base and inventory system to evaluate whether reclamation is feasible in areas covered by petitions. The information required in § 764.25(b) is necessary to allow the regulatory authority to determine, when a permit application is filed, whether it includes any areas designated as unsuitable for surface coal mining.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Estanislao Cruz.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney, New York County, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court and on the further condition that the appeal be perfected and noticed for argument for a term on or before the March 1961 Term of this court. Anthony F. Marra, Esq., of 100 Centre Street, New York, New York is assigned as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
§ 234.15 Use of visual recording devices. ( a ) The use of cameras or other visual recording devices on the Pentagon Reservation is prohibited, unless the use of such items are approved by the Pentagon Force Protection Agency, the Installation Commander, or the Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs.
( b ) It shall be unlawful to make any photograph, sketch, picture, drawing, map or graphical representation of the Pentagon Reservation without first obtaining permission of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency, Installation Commander, or the Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs.
Appeal No. 75-326.

#### Violet M. Cavanagh *v.*Robert D. Cavanagh.

*Breslin, Sweeney & Gordon, Robert H. Breslin, Jr.,*for petitioner.

*George Ajootian, Isidore Kirshenbaum, Anthony J. Bucci,*Co-Commissioners, for respondent.

The petitioner’s motion to remand this case to the Family Court so that it may consider her motion for payment of utilities and maintenance of the real estate is granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1157 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1157

 Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of 
  these brave men and women who protect public safety, and expressing 
 support for the designation of April 18, 2024, as ``National Lineman 
                          Appreciation Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2024

  Mr. Rouzer (for himself, Mr. Flood, Ms. Perez, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. 
Kean of New Jersey, Mrs. Cammack, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Ms. Ross, Mr. 
  Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Fleischmann, Ms. Adams, Mrs. Miller of 
West Virginia, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Babin, Mrs. Chavez-DeRemer, Mr. Veasey, 
Ms. Wild, Mr. Dunn of Florida, Mr. Norman, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Ms. 
 Tokuda, Mr. Donalds, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Nickel, 
 Mr. McGarvey, and Mr. Boyle of Pennsylvania) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of 
  these brave men and women who protect public safety, and expressing 
 support for the designation of April 18, 2024, as ``National Lineman 
                          Appreciation Day''.

Whereas the profession of linemen is steeped in personal, family, and 
        professional tradition;
Whereas linemen are often first responders during storms and other catastrophic 
        events, working to make the scene safe for other public safety heroes;
Whereas linemen must work high atop powerlines 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, 
        to keep electricity flowing;
Whereas linemen play a vital role in the Nation's economy by maintaining and 
        growing the energy infrastructure of the United States;
Whereas linemen must often work under dangerous conditions separated from their 
        families to keep schools and businesses open;
Whereas linemen deserve recognition from the community regarding the danger of 
        their work; and
Whereas, April 18, 2024, would be an appropriate date to designate as ``National 
        Lineman Appreciation Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the efforts of linemen in keeping the power 
        on and protecting public safety;
            (2) supports the designation of ``National Lineman 
        Appreciation Day''; and
            (3) recognizes linemen as first responders.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Handleman Company (the Registrant) that the Annual Report of the
Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 27, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ A.A. KOCH                                                  
|                   |  |  |  | A.A. KOCH President and Chief Executive Officer                
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 27, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ ROZANNE KOKKO                                              
|                   |  |  |  | ROZANNE KOKKO Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

These certifications are not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 2, 2020

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20

- 1622 Lower Tribunal No. 17

- 25120

________________ 

### VME Group International, LLC, etc., et al. , Petitioner s ,
vs. 

### The Grand Condominium Association, Inc., etc., et al. , Respondent s .

A Case of Original Jurisdiction

– Prohibition

. Law Offices of Karen J. Haas, and Karen J. Haas , for petitioner s . Roniel Rodriguez, IV, P.A. , and Roniel Rodriguez, IV; Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Scott A. Cole, for respondent s .

Before EMAS, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 VME Group International , LLC files a petition for writ of prohibition, seeking review of the trial court’s order denying VME’s motion for disqualification of the trial judge. The petition is based upon documented ac tivity occurring in August of 2018. The motion to disqualify was filed in September of 2020. Neither the motion nor its attachments contain a ny averment or allegation regarding when these facts were discovered, nor any averment or allegation (save for a conclusory statement) that the motion was filed in a timely manner. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330 (e) (providing :

“ A motion to disqualify shall b e filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion . . . ” )

. See State

v. Oliu , 183 So. 3d 1161 , 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016 ) ( stating: “ While these allegations give rise to an objectivel y reasonable fear of bias or prejudice requiring disqualification of the trial judge, we are compelled to deny the petition for writ of prohibition because the motion to disqualify the trial judge was not timely filed. ” )
A lthough we are co mpelled to deny the petition, we note that the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration permit a judge to enter an order of disqualification on her own initiative. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(i) ( providing: “ Judge’s Initiative

. Nothing in this rule limi ts the judge’s authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge’s own initiative”) ; Oliu , 183 So. 3d 1163. Petition denied.
EXHIBIT 32.4



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Duquesne Light Company (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Stevan R. Schott, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 9thday of November, 2004.



/s/ Stevan R. SchottStevan R. SchottSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original
of this certification required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company, who will retain it and furnish a copy to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 12
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS TO
COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
(In thousands, except ratios)
(Unaudited)
  Year Ended December 312008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Fixed charges
    
    $
    258,453
    
    
    $
    275,648
    
    
    $
    235,521
    
    
    $
    106,909
    
    
    $
    44,939Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    20,251
    
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,259Combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    278,704
    
    
    $
    295,904
    
    
    $
    255,777
    
    
    $
    127,165
    
    
    $
    65,198Fixed charges
    
    $
    258,453
    
    
    $
    275,648
    
    
    $
    235,521
    
    
    $
    106,909
    
    
    $
    44,939Income from continuing
operations
    
    
    125,923
    
    
    
    24,713
    
    
    
    3,843
    
    
    
    17,195
    
    
    
    39,869$
    384,376
    
    
    $
    300,361
    
    
    $
    239,364
    
    
    $
    124,104
    
    
    $
    84,808Ratio of income from continuing
operations to combined
fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends
    
    
    1.38:1
    
    
    
    1.02:1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.30:1Deficiency of income from
continuing operations (before
fixed charges) to combined fixed
charges and preferred stock
dividends
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    16,413
    
    
    $
    3,061
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-1782V

UNPUBLISHED

COURTNEY and CHRISTOPHER 

COUNTS, on behalf of their minor 

child, M.C.,

 Petitioners,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: August 23, 2021

Withdrawal of petition; Order 

concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On December 7, 2020, Courtney and Christopher Counts filed a petition for 

compensation on behalf of their minor child, M.C., under the National Vaccine Injury 

Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.

2 Petitioners alleged that 

M.C. suffered injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on June 21, 

2017. ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine 

Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition 

under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section 

300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42 

U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On August 20, 2021, Petitioners timely filed a notice to 

withdraw their petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b). 

In light of Petitioners’ election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioners’ request to withdraw the

petition is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that 

proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment 

“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United 

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available 

to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, 

I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Income From Wages and Salaries in the Postwar Period

              																	Myers, Robert J. (Robert Julius), 1912-2010					,	Tolles, N. Arnold					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Income From Wages and Salaries in the Postwar Period : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 845*,												Washington, D.C: 								For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4314,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER