alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4334. Insurance of property

The Alien Property Custodian may procure insurance in such amounts, and from such insurers, as he believes will adequately protect him against loss in connection with property or interest or proceeds held by him.

(Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, §37, as added Dec. 18, 1941, ch. 593, title III, §305, as added Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 878, §1, 60 Stat. 930.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 37 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Prior to classification as section 37, section was formerly classified to section 620 of the former Appendix to this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by law in Alien Property Custodian and Office of Alien Property Custodian transferred to Attorney General by Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1947, §101, eff. July 1, 1947, 12 F.R. 4534, 61 Stat. 951, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1*

                           Section 1350 Certification


        I, Richard M. Haddock, the chief executive officer of LaserCard
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certify pursuant to section
1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to our knowledge:

        (i)     the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and

        (ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:   February 3, 2006


/s/ Richard M. Haddock
----------------------
Richard M. Haddock



-----------------------

*       The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed "filed" with
the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.


                                       39
<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
-----------------------------------------


Security Capital Corporation:

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective 
Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 2-91703 (which is also 
Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 2-82443) on Form 
S-8 of our report dated December 6, 1996, appearing in this annual report on 
Form 10-K of Security Capital Corporation for the year ended September 30, 
1996.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
January 10, 1997
<PAGE>   1
                                   Exhibit 11

                        Computation of Earnings per Share



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                                           June 30
                                                                    1997             1996
                                                                    ----             ----
<S>                                                               <C>              <C>     
Net income                                                        $  8,982         $  8,412
                                                                  ========         ========

Common stock outstanding, net of treasury stock,
  beginning of year                                                 16,803           17,594
Weighted average treasury stock issued during the quarter               42               53
Weighted average common stock equivalents                              573              685
Weighted average treasury stock repurchased                            (75)             (31)
                                                                  --------         --------

Weighted average common stock outstanding, net of
  treasury stock, end of quarter                                    17,343           18,301
                                                                  ========         ========

Earnings per share                                                $   0.52         $   0.46
                                                                  ========         ========
</TABLE>
#### Charles R. Rinaldo, as Assignee of Sam Aricidiacona, Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 3.) (Claim No. 50396.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in *Crisafulli v State*(66 AD2d 1009). (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims—negligence, flooding.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 07, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0209. TUSCANY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC, v. C.P., AN ADULT FEMALE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 23C08296
## Phantom Pre**- Flight Checklist** 

Prior to flight
 Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of other aerial traffic  Ensure area/zone of intended flightpath is clear of any electrical/power lines  Ensure atmospheric conditions are optimal for safe operation of UAS
Pre - Flight checklist
 Visual inspection for defects  Batteries fully charged and checked -transmitter, UAS, IPhone, approved/compatible  Props tightened and locked  SD card in camera  Lens cap removed  Antennae up and parallel  Transmitter turned on  WII FI turned on  UAS Turned on  DJI Pilot app turned on, no other apps running  Calibrate compass  Wait for minimum reception of seven satellites  Verify home point established  Area clear of people/obstructions Flight Check list
 Hover close for 20 seconds. Look/listen for defects  Confirm expected stick operation  Monitor battery power  Monitor signal strength  Verify satellite reception/minimum seven  Keep line of sight with UAS at all times
### [§§1207, 1208. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–12, §3(a)(8), Apr. 10, 1989, 103 Stat. 18]

Section 1207, added Pub. L. 95–454, title II, §202(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1130, provided for hearings and decisions on complaints filed by Special Counsel. See section 1215(a)(2) to (5) of this title.

Section 1208, added Pub. L. 95–454, title II, §202(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1130, related to stays of certain personnel actions. See section 1214(b) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of sections effective 90 days following Apr. 10, 1989, see section 11 of Pub. L. 101–12, set out as an Effective Date of 1989 Amendment note under section 1201 of this title.
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Samex Mining Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Larry D. McLean, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





“Larry D. McLean”


Larry D. McLean


Chief Financial Officer


May
 30, 2012
### §312301. Definition

In this chapter, the term "Commission" means the Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad established under section 312303 of this title.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3252.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 312301 | no source. | |

Section
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Ducommun Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Anthony J. Reardon, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joseph P. Bellino, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Anthony J. ReardonAnthony J. ReardonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Joseph P. BellinoJoseph P. BellinoVice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: January 6, 2012

The foregoing certification is accompanying the Form 10-Q solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30242

Summary Calendar

 

DARRELL J. GUILLOT,

Plaintiff,

versus

BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

versus

KAREN DEVILLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Louisiana

(94-CV-2370)

 

October 9, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

Having reviewed the briefs and record, we conclude,

essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s well
2

considered February 15, 1996, memorandum opinion, that summary

judgment was properly granted for appellee-defendant Bellsouth

Telecommunications, Inc. dismissing the severed Title VII claim

against it of appellant-cross-claimant Karen Deville. The district

court’s judgment is accordingly

AFFIRMED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7405** 

TIMOTHY R. MUELLER , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. JOHN M. JABE, Deputy Director of Operations , Defendant

– Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Cou rt for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. ( 7:10

- cv - 00239

- jlk

- mfu )

Submitted : December 16, 2010 Decided: December 29, 2010

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un pub lished per curiam opinion
. Timothy R. Mueller, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Timothy R. Mueller see ks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions to appoint counsel, for class certification, and to amend his complaint
. No final judgment has been entered in the underlying case, which remains pending in the district court. This court may exe rcise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). To the extent that Mue ller seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his motions for appointment of counsel and to amend his complaint, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal in the absence of a final judgment. Further, although an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a mo tion for class certification may proceed with leave of this court, Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); see Fed. R. App. P . 5 , Mueller has not properly petitioned this court for such leave
. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Mueller’ s motion to this court for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Stevan R. Schott, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 10thday of May, 2005.



/s/ Stevan R. SchottStevan R. SchottSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-1

PLATE 9

a2

Baton Rou
° ge

GULF OF MEXICO

UPPER CLAIBORNE AQUIFER

°
Stuttgart

33°

Era

GULF OF MEXICO

MIDDLE WILCOX AQUIFER

BOUNDARY OF
‘STUDY AREA

3x

50 MILES

0 25 50 KILOMETERS GULF OF MEXICO

MIDDLE CLAIBORNE AQUIFER

BOUNDARY OF
.— STUDY AREA

azl

25

50 MILES

0 25 50 KILOMETERS GULF OF MEXICO

LOWER WILCOX AQUIFER

BOUNDARY OF

BOUNDARY OF
y STUDY AREA

STUDY AREA

33°

sel

Baton Rous
0 Baton Rouge

25 50 MILES

50 MILES

25 50 KILOMETERS GULF OF MEXICO 0 25 50 KILOMETERS

LOWER CLAIBORNE-UPPER WILCOX AQUIFER

BOUNDARY OF
STUDY AREA

EXPLANATION
—10—— Line of equal water-level decline—

Hachures indicate closed areas of greater
decline. Interval is 5 feet

25

50 MILES

25 50 KILOMETERS

MAPS SHOWING SIMULATED WATER-LEVEL DECLINES IN THE UPPER CLAIBORNE, MIDDLE CLAIBORNE,
LOWER CLAIBORNE-UPPER WILCOX, MIDDLE WILCOX, AND LOWER WILCOX AQUIFERS, 1987-2000 WITH A 20 PERCENT INCREASE
IN 1985 PUMPAGE RATES, MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT AQUIFER SYSTEM, SOUTH-CENTRAL UNITED STATES
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 1040

In re: DEANDRE JOHNSON , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 2:20

- cv - 00474

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : February 21 , 2023 Decided: February 24, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ , Circuit Judge s , and MOTZ , Senior Circuit Judge

.
Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Deandre Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1040 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Deandre Johnson petitions for a writ of mandamus , seeking an order directing the district court to grant relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, which the district court denied in August 2022

. We conclude that Johnson is not entitl ed to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018)

. M andamus relief is availabl e only when the petitioner “has no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires” and demonstrates “a clear and indisputable right” to that relief. Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted). Furth er, mandamu s may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Johnson is not available by way of mandamus. A ccordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. W e dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1040 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
### §645. Victim protection training for the Department of Homeland Security

#### (a) Directive to DHS law enforcement officials and task forces

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after December 21, 2018, the Secretary shall issue a directive to—

(A) all Federal law enforcement officers and relevant personnel employed by the Department who may be involved in the investigation of human trafficking offenses; and

(B) members of all task forces led by the Department that participate in the investigation of human trafficking offenses.

#### (2) Required instructions

The directive required to be issued under paragraph (1) shall include instructions on—

(A) the investigation of individuals who patronize or solicit human trafficking victims as being engaged in severe trafficking in persons and how such individuals should be investigated for their roles in severe trafficking in persons; and

(B) how victims of sex or labor trafficking often engage in criminal acts as a direct result of severe trafficking in persons and such individuals are victims of a crime and affirmative measures should be taken to avoid arresting, charging, or prosecuting such individuals for any offense that is the direct result of their victimization.

#### (b) Victim screening protocol

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after December 21, 2018, the Secretary shall issue a screening protocol for use during all anti-trafficking law enforcement operations in which the Department is involved.

#### (2) Requirements

The protocol required to be issued under paragraph (1) shall—

(A) require the individual screening of all adults and children who are suspected of engaging in commercial sex acts, child labor that is a violation of law, or work in violation of labor standards to determine whether each individual screened is a victim of human trafficking;

(B) require affirmative measures to avoid arresting, charging, or prosecuting human trafficking victims for any offense that is the direct result of their victimization;

(C) be developed in consultation with relevant interagency partners and nongovernmental organizations that specialize in the prevention of human trafficking or in the identification and support of victims of human trafficking and survivors of human trafficking; and

(D) include—

(i) procedures and practices to ensure that the screening process minimizes trauma or revictimization of the person being screened; and

(ii) guidelines on assisting victims of human trafficking in identifying and receiving restorative services.

#### (c) Mandatory training

The training described in sections 642 and 644 of this title shall include training necessary to implement—

(1) the directive required under subsection (a); and

(2) the protocol required under subsection (b).

(Pub. L. 114–22, title IX, §906, as added Pub. L. 115–392, §5(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5252.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015, and not as part of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 which comprises this chapter.
#### Erie County Board of Social Welfare, Respondent, v. Matthew McDowell, Appellant.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, witli $10 motion costs.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Isaac J. Gaon,  Chief Executive  Officer of Datatec  Systems,
Inc.,  a Delaware  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify,  to his
knowledge, that:

            The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  April
            30, 2002 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with
            the   requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the
            Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and  the  information
            contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
            respects,   the   financial   condition   and  results  of
            operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ Isaac J. Gaon
                                           -----------------
                                           Isaac J. Gaon
                                           Chief Executive Officer

                                           Dated: October 3, 2002
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Power Company LLC (Duke Power) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Myron L. Caldwell, Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Duke Power, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Power.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MYRON L. CALDWELL                        
|Myron L. Caldwell                               
|Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                
|May 9, 2006
#### WANAMAKER, Respondent, v. HEBBLETHWAITE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 16, 1903.)

Action by John Wanamaker against Frank H. Hebblethwaite.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs.