### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

-down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg+2

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

-downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg0 

### and , HgP, and Hg+2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

-down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICRListed (by boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICREIA

Facility Code Facility

Name Boiler ID 10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Measured Value (ppm) Basis

(Wet or Dry) Test

Method Used Run Number Test Start Date Test Start

Time Test End Time CO Emission Test Results

Test End DateData Flag

(ADL, BDL, DDL) Test

Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O2 Steam

Output (1000 lb/hr) Total

Heat Input (mmBtu/h r) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO2(%) Flue Gas

O2(%) CO Emission Test Results Calculated Emission RateFuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measure

ment Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measure

ment Method Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2 Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measure

ment Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measure

ment Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4 Other Supporti

ng Informati

onEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Time Test End DateMeasured Value

(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Formaldehyde Emission Test ResultsTest Method

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O2 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission RateFuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO2(%) Flue Gas

O2(%) Flue Gas Flow

Rate (dscfm)Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Fuel #2 Fuel #3Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test End Time Test End Date Methane Emission Test ResultsTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu Methane Emission Test Results Calculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O2 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO2(%) Flue Gas

O2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2Measurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Fuel #4 Fuel #3Measurement

Method Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Test End Time SO2Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O2 Calculated Emission RateFlue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO2(%) Flue Gas

O2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Temperature (F)Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Measured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test End Time Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results

Test End DatePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments (lb/mmBtu) Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate Flue Gas O2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas CO2(%)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA /QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1

Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng) Total

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng) Other Supporting InformationSample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≤20% of field

recovery test ≤10% of Section 1 Hg

mass for Hg conc. >1

μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section Trap #1Section 1

Mass Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike Total NonSpike Sample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit

≤20% of field

recovery test Trap #2Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Measured Spike Recovery ( R ) Paired Trap Agreement (RD)

≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 ≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1

μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1R (%) by

Run Ravg(%) Limit

Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% Measured Spike Recovery ( R )

#DIV/0!EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Hg 0Value (μg/dscm) Measured Hg +2Value (μg/dscm) Test End Time Test End DateMeasured Hg PValue

(μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsTest Method

Comments Total Mercury (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #1 Flue Gas O2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Speciated Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data

2-Hexanone 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Benzene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Bromochloromethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Bromodichloromethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Bromomethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Carbon disulfide 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Carbon tetrachloride 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Chlorobenzene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Chloroform 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Chloromethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Methylene Chloride 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM p-Isopropyltoluene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Tetrachloroethylene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Toluene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Trichlorofluoromethane 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM Xylenes (isomer & mixtures) 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:43 AM 2-Hexanone 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Benzene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Bromochloromethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Bromodichloromethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Bromomethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Carbon disulfide 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Carbon tetrachloride 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Chlorobenzene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Chloroform 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Chloromethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Dichlorodifluoromethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Methylene Chloride 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM p-Isopropyltoluene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Tetrachloroethylene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Toluene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Trichlorofluoromethane 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM Xylenes (isomer & mixtures) 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:35 PM 2-Hexanone 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Benzene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Bromochloromethane 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Bromodichloromethane 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Bromomethane 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Carbon disulfide 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Carbon tetrachloride 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Chlorobenzene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Chloroform 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Chloromethane 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as

needed) Run Number Test Start

Date Test Start

Time Test End

Date Test End

TimeDichlorodifluoromethane 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM

Methylene Chloride 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM p-Isopropyltoluene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Tetrachloroethylene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Toluene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Trichlorofluoromethane 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PM Xylenes (isomer & mixtures) 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:17 PMFootnote

s: * Front half fraction contains filter, cyclone, and cartridge ** Back half fraction contains condensate, solvent, impingers

Measured Value (μg/m3) Basis Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Front Half

Mass (ng) Back Half

Mass (ng)

2.316E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 0.0 21.0 3.595E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 32.6 0.0 5.882E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 0.0 5.3 1.081E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 9.8 0.0 1.875E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 170.0 0.0 4.808E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 436.0 0.0 3.419E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 3.1 0.0 4.963E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 4.5 0.0 7.058E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 56.0 0.8 3.683E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 334.0 0.0 1.015E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 9.2 0.0 4.793E+01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 132.0 43,330.0 1.467E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 13.3 0.0 2.603E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 23.6 0.0 4.900E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 38.1 6.3 3.066E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 27.8 0.0 2.426E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 2.2 0.0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0 3.257E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 32.3 0.0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0 5.142E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 5.1 0.0 1.198E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 118.8 0.0 7.335E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 727.4 0.0 1.815E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 1.8 0.0 2.521E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 2.5 0.0 6.218E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 43.0 18.7 2.753E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 273.0 0.0 9.478E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 9.4 0.0 2.521E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 150.0 100.0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0 1.402E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 13.9 0.0 3.778E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 35.5 2.0 1.523E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 15.1 0.0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0 2.985E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 31.5 0.0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0 1.090E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 11.5 0.0 1.944E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 205.2 0.0 4.184E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 441.6 0.0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0 2.558E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 2.7 0.0 7.201E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 58.0 18.0 1.146E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 1,206.0 3.02.691E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 28.4 0.0 6.030E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 503.0 133.3 1.042E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 1.1 0.0 8.339E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 8.8 0.0 3.424E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL 14.8 21.3 1.241E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DDL 13.1 0.0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL 0.0 0.0Total Mass

(ng) Test

Method Comment

s lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O2

21.0 2.02E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 32.6 3.14E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 5.3 5.14E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 9.8 9.45E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 170.0 1.64E-07 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 436.0 4.20E-07 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 3.1 2.99E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 4.5 4.34E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 56.8 6.17E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 334.0 3.22E-07 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 9.2 8.87E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 43,462.0 4.19E-05 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 13.3 1.28E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 23.6 2.28E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 44.4 4.28E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 27.8 2.68E-08 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 2.2 2.12E-09 487 578 10.6000 12.92 6.30 0.0 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 32.3 2.82E-08 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 0.0 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 5.1 4.46E-09 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 118.8 1.04E-07 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 727.4 6.36E-07 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 1.8 1.57E-09 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 2.5 2.19E-09 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 61.7 5.39E-08 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 273.0 2.39E-07 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 9.4 8.22E-09 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 150.1 2.19E-07 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 0.0 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 13.9 1.22E-08 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 37.5 3.28E-08 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 15.1 1.32E-08 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 0.0 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5000 13.14 6.18 0.0 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 31.5 2.60E-08 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 0.0 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 11.5 9.50E-09 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 205.2 1.70E-07 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 441.6 3.65E-07 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 0.0 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 2.7 2.23E-09 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 76.0 6.28E-08 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 1,209.0 9.99E-07 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 Flue Gas O2(%) Calculated Emission Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total

Heat Input (mmBtu/h r) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO2(%)28.4 2.35E-08 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26

636.3 5.26E-07 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 1.1 9.09E-10 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 8.8 7.27E-09 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 36.1 2.99E-08 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 13.1 1.08E-08 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26 0.0 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8000 13.11 6.26Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measure

ment Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure

160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160775.43 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 158643.17 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation Flue Gas Flow Rate (scfm) Flue Gas

Temperat ure (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 160012.75 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculationMeasure

ment Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measure

ment Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measure

ment Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Other Supporting InformationActual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.

Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,482 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 8,905 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-factor calculated during test: 9,079 scf/MMBtu, values shown calculated using standard F-factor of 9780 scf/MMBtu.EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data

Acetophenone 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Benzidine 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Benzoic Acid 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Phenol 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM 2-Methylnaphthalene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Acenaphthene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Acenaphthylene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Anthracene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Benzo(a)anthracene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Benzo(a)pyrene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Benzo(e)pyrene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Chrysene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Fluoranthene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Fluorene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Naphthalene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Perylene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Phenanthrene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Pyrene 1 5/5/2010 7:43 AM 5/5/2010 9:57 AM Acetophenone 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Benzidine 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Benzoic Acid 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Phenol 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM 2-Methylnaphthalene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Acenaphthene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Acenaphthylene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Anthracene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Benzo(a)anthracene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Benzo(a)pyrene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Benzo(b)fluoranthene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Benzo(e)pyrene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Chrysene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Fluoranthene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Fluorene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Naphthalene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as

needed) Run Number Test Start

Date Test Start

Time Test End

Date Test End

TimePerylene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM

Phenanthrene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Pyrene 2 5/5/2010 10:35 AM 5/5/2010 12:48 PM Acetophenone 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Benzidine 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Benzoic Acid 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Phenol 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM 2-Methylnaphthalene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Acenaphthene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Acenaphthylene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Anthracene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Benzo(a)anthracene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Benzo(a)pyrene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Benzo(e)pyrene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Benzo(k)fluoranthene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Chrysene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Fluoranthene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Fluorene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Naphthalene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Perylene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Phenanthrene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PM Pyrene 3 5/5/2010 1:17 PM 5/5/2010 3:30 PMFootnote

s: * Front Half Composite contains particulate filter, front half of the filter holder, and probe solvent rinses ** Back Half Composite contains XAD-2 resin tube, back half of the filter holder, and coil condenser solvent rinses *** Condensate Composite contains condensate and Impinger contents and the glassware solvent rinses

Measured Value (μg/m3) Basis

(Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Front

Half mass* (ng) Back Half

mass* (ng) Condensate Mass*** (ng) Total

Composit e (ng)

1.885E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 1100 3600 0 4700 1.363E+01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 17000 0 17000 34000 2.807E+01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 70000 0 70000 1.363E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 3400 0 3400 1.059E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D ADL 4 210 30 264 1.163E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 2.9 0 0 2.9 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 3.529E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 8.8 0 0 8.8 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 4.171E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D ADL 4.6 4 1.8 10.4 2.887E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 4 0 3.2 7.2 2.125E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 5.3 0 0 5.3 7.419E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D ADL 10 4.8 3.7 18.5 8.822E-04 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 2.2 0 0 2.2 1.019E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 1.6 0 0.94 2.54 5.935E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D ADL 7.1 4 3.7 14.8 4.491E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 4.8 6.4 0 11.2 7.258E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 4.1 14 0 18.1 4.491E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 8.2 0 3 11.2 2.743E-01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D ADL 51 550 83 684 2.206E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 3.6 0 1.9 5.5 1.484E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 16 21 0 37 6.015E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 15 0 15 2.403E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 1100 4800 0 5900 6.924E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 17000 0 0 17000 2.647E+01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 65000 0 65000 1.792E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 4400 0 4400 2.036E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 4 26 0 50 1.181E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 2.9 0 0 2.9 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 2.851E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 0 7 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 9.775E-04 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 0 2.4 2.4 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 3.421E-04 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 0 0.84 0.84 1.100E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 0 2.7 2.7 3.747E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 3.9 5.3 0 9.2 4.480E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 4.1 6.9 0 11 9.368E-04 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 2.3 0 0 2.3 2.281E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 56 0 0 56 Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Test Results0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 4.888E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 12 0 0 12 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 1.679E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 4200 0 4200 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 2.638E+01 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 66000 0 66000 1.399E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 3500 0 3500 2.159E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 5 29 0 54 1.239E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 3.1 0 0 3.1 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 2.438E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 6.1 0 0 6.1 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 1.991E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 4.5 0.48 4.98 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 5.756E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 4.8 9.6 0 14.4 6.196E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 4.5 11 0 15.5 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 2.438E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 61 0 0 61 0.000E+00 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D BDL 0 0 0 0 1.439E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 13 23 0 36 3.957E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270D DDL 0 9.9 0 9.9* Front Half Composite contains particulate filter, front half of the filter holder, and probe solvent rinses ** Back Half Composite contains XAD-2 resin tube, back half of the filter holder, and coil condenser solvent rinses *** Condensate Composite contains condensate and Impinger contents and the glassware solvent rinses

Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O2

1.648E-06 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 1.192E-05 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 2.454E-05 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 1.192E-06 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 9.255E-08 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 1.017E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 0.000E+00 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 3.085E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 0.000E+00 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 3.646E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 2.524E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 1.858E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 6.486E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 7.713E-10 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 8.905E-10 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 5.189E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 3.927E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 6.346E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 3.927E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 2.398E-07 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 1.928E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 1.297E-08 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 5.259E-09 487 578 10.6 12.92 6.30 160750.1 2.084E-06 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 6.004E-06 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 2.296E-05 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 1.554E-06 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 1.77E-08 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 1.02E-09 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 2.47E-09 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 8.48E-10 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 2.97E-10 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 9.54E-10 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 3.25E-09 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 3.88E-09 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 8.12E-10 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 1.98E-08 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 Flue Gas O2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (scfm) Calculated Emission Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO2(%)0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 4.24E-09 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 0.00E+00 490 578 10.5 13.14 6.18 158650.1 1.464E-06 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.000E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 2.300E-05 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 1.220E-06 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 1.88E-08 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 1.08E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 2.13E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 1.74E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 5.02E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 5.40E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 2.13E-08 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 0.00E+00 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 1.25E-08 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1 3.45E-09 490 573 10.8 13.11 6.26 159939.1Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure

214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 214.3 540 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 220.2 541 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculation 219.9 536 bitum inous ton/day boiler efficiency calculationMeasure

ment Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measure

ment Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measure

ment Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Other Supporting InformationEm ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu

Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtuEm ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtuEm ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtuEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

1 5/4/2010 7:50 AM 5/4/2010 2 5/4/2010 11:20 AM 5/4/2010 3 5/4/2010 2:47 PM 5/4/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

8:50 AM 4.79E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 12:20 PM 2.93E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 3:47 PM 5.15E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments ADL 4.42E-05 510 647 12.4 13.77 BDL 2.71E-06 515 647 11.3 13.84 ADL 4.81E-06 512 653 11.9 13.74 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure 5.34 152203.3 235.3 605 bitum inous ton/day 5.43 157195.3 230.3 605 bitum inous ton/day 5.54 158782.9 216.5 615 bitum inous ton/day

Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O2(%)Measurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate boiler efficiency

calculation boiler efficiency

calculation boiler efficiency

calculation Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu

Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtu Other Supporting InformationEm ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,482 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 8,905 scf/MMBtu Em ission values shown are based on standard F-Factor of 9,780 scf/MMBtu. Actual F-Factor calculated during test was 9,079 scf/MMBtuEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Test End Time Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments Calculated

Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO2(%) Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas CO2(%) Flue Gas

O2(%)Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured NO (ppm) Test End Time Test End DateMeasured NO2(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used NOXEmission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments (lb/mmBtu) Total NOXCalculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O2 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO2(%) Flue Gas

O2(%) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10377 James River Cogeneration Company 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeTotal Dissolved Solids (mg solids/liter) Total Suspended Solids (mg solids/liter) Test End Time Test End DateTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Constisuent Emission Test ResultsTest Method Comments Fuel Input Rate Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4Other Supporting Information