CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1 

(Electronic Format) 

I. GENERAL INFORMATION 

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District 

Rule No(s): 1130 & 1128 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Rule 1130 Amended and Rule 1128 Rescinded 

November 19, 2013 

Rule Title(s): Rule 1130 - Graphic Arts & Rule 1128 - Paper, Fabric, and Film Coating Operations 

Date Submitted to ARB: January 7, 2014 

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 1130 - 3/8/96, 1128 - 3/8/96 

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No (If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Tracy Walters Phone Number: (760) 245-1661 x6122 E-mail Address: twalters@mdaqmd.ca.gov 

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule 

The proposed amendment of Rule 1130 – Graphic Arts satisfies the provisions of former Health & Safety (H&S) 

Code §39614(d) which required the adoption of readily available, feasible and cost-effective control measures for 

particulate matter, and also satisfies 42 U.S.C. §§7511a (Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) §182) which requires that 

ozone nonattainment areas implement Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for sources that are 

subject to Control Technology Guidelines (CTGs) for major sources of ozone. This rule amendment incorporates 

the provisions of Rule 1128 into the amended version of Rule 1130, as the basis for the rules are similar and 

many redundancies exist. Rule 1128 was rescinded. 

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 

 (CO) PM TAC (name): 

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS 

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) 

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined. 

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A 

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A 

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: N/A 

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible): 

N/A 
 

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2 

(Electronic Format) 

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A 

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A 

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A 

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A 

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and 

planning. 

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS 

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split 

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 3

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100% 

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A% 

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as 

necessary): N/A 

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY 

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No 

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) C of the Rule. 

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: Emission control system, application methods, work 

practices, AECP, 

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 

The Rule Contains: 

Emission Limits in Section(s): (C) Work Practice Standards in Section(s): (C)(11) 

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (E) Reporting Requirements in Section(s): (E) 
 

5/1/2002 

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3 

(Electronic Format) 

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN 

 No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment 

Discussion: The proposed amendments to Rule 1130 – Graphic Arts and the rescission of Rule 1128 – Paper, Fabric and 

Film Coating Operations does not cause the release of additional air contaminants, or create any adverse environmental 

impacts because the amended rule proposes combining the provisions of both rules, a more stringent applicability, as well 

as, more stringent VOC limits for all categories, including solvent cleaning operations, than the existing rule.