alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1994
<CASH>                                          36,343
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,116
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    110,831
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          73,688
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            72,815
<LOANS>                                        483,592
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 731,764
<DEPOSITS>                                     615,968
<SHORT-TERM>                                    24,285
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,392
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 731,764
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 38,110
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               10,374
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   747
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                49,231
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              17,838
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,550
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           30,681
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      (5)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (170)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 21,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,754
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,754
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.84
<LOANS-NON>                                        734
<LOANS-PAST>                                       522
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   134
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 15,952
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,791
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      619
<RECOVERIES>                                       627
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,794
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,627
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,167
        

</TABLE>
### §13142. Administration

This subchapter shall be subject to the rules and regulations of—

(1) and administered by—

(A) the Committee on Ethics of the House of Representatives, with respect to Members, officers, and employees of the House of Representatives; and

(B) in the case of Senators and legislative branch officers and employees other than those officers and employees specified in subparagraph (A), the committee to which reports filed by such officers and employees under subchapter I are transmitted under that subchapter, except that the authority of this section may be delegated by such committee with respect to such officers and employees;

(2) the Office of Government Ethics and administered by designated agency ethics officials with respect to officers and employees of the executive branch; and

(3) and administered by the Judicial Conference of the United States (or such other agency as it may designate) with respect to officers and employees of the judicial branch.

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(c), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4303.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 13142 | 5 U.S.C. App. (EGA §503) | Pub. L. 95–521, title V, §503, as added Pub. L. 101–194, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1761; amended Pub. L. 101–280, §7(c), May 4, 1990, 104 Stat. 161; Pub. L. 102–90, title I, §6(b)(1), Aug. 14, 1991, 105 Stat. 450. |

Section

In paragraph (1)(A), the words "Committee on Ethics of the House of Representatives" are substituted for "Committee on Standards of Official Conduct of the House of Representatives" because of House Resolution No. 5, 112th Congress, January 5, 2011.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,255
<SECURITIES>                                   245,564
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,675,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,703
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,998,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          869,258
<BONDS>                                     13,894,203
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       184,960
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,998,274
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,742,471
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,735,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,878
<INCOME-TAX>                                       405
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,473
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 22.100 Purpose.

This part outlines grants officers' and DoD Components' responsibilities related to the award and administration of grants and cooperative agreements.

[85 FR 51242, Aug. 19, 2020]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DENNIS AINSWORTH MCCARTHY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-98-26-R, CA-00-73-7) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Ainsworth McCarthy, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Ainsworth McCarthy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McCarthy , Nos. CR-98-26- R; CA-00-73-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §124e. Training for employees of intelligence components

The Secretary shall provide training and guidance for employees, officials, and senior executives of the intelligence components of the Department to develop knowledge of laws, regulations, operations, policies, procedures, and programs that are related to the functions of the Department relating to the collection, processing, analysis, and dissemination of information within the scope of the information sharing environment, including homeland security information, terrorism information, and weapons of mass destruction information, or national intelligence (as defined in section 3003(5) of title 50).

(Pub. L. 107–296, title II, §208, as added Pub. L. 110–53, title V, §503(a), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 312.)
§ 200.2014 Sanctions. ( a ) The ALJ may sanction a person, including any party or attorney, for failing to comply with an order or procedure, for failing to defend an action or for other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the hearing. Such sanctions will reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct. Such sanction may include— ( 1 ) In the case of refusal to provide or permit discovery under the terms of this part, drawing negative factual inferences or treating such refusal as an admission by deeming the matter, or certain facts, to be established;
( 2 ) Prohibiting a party from introducing certain evidence or otherwise supporting a particular claim or defense;
( 3 ) Striking pleadings, in whole or in part;
( 4 ) Staying the proceedings;
( 5 ) Dismissal of the action;
( 6 ) Entering a decision by default; and
( 7 ) Refusing to consider any motion or other action that is not filed in a timely manner.
( b ) In civil money penalty cases commenced under section 1128A of the Social Security Act or under any provision in this part which incorporates section 1128A(c)(4) of the Social Security Act, the ALJ may also order the party or attorney who has engaged in any of the acts described in paragraph (a) of this section to pay attorney's fees and other costs caused by the failure or misconduct.
§ 229.2 Authority. ( a ) The regulations in this part are promulgated pursuant to section 10(a) of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 U.S.C. 470ii), which requires that the Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture and Defense and the Chairman of the Board of the Tennessee Valley Authority jointly develop uniform rules and regulations for carrying out the purposes of the Act.
( b ) In addition to the regulations in this part, section 10(b) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 470ii) provides that each Federal land manager shall promulgate such rules and regulations, consistent with the uniform rules and regulations in this part, as may be necessary for carrying out the purposes of the Act.
### §5502. Unauthorized office; prohibition on use of funds

(a) Payment for services may not be made from the Treasury of the United States to an individual acting or assuming to act as an officer in the civil service or uniformed services in an office which is not authorized by existing law, unless the office is later sanctioned by law.

(b) Except as otherwise provided by statute, public money and appropriations may not be used for pay or allowance for an individual employed by an official of the United States retired from active service.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 475.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (a) | 5 U.S.C. 52. | R.S. §1760. |
| (b) | 5 U.S.C. 85. | July 1, 1898, ch. 546, §1 (3d proviso on p. 644), 30 Stat. 644. |

Statutes at Large

In subsection (a), the words "in the civil service or uniformed services" are substituted for "civil, military, or naval".

In subsection (b), the words "Except as otherwise provided by statute" are added in recognition of the Act of Aug. 25, 1958, Pub. L. 85–745, 72 Stat. 838, which authorizes an office staff for former Presidents. The reference to "public money and appropriations" is added for clarity.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
§ 1900.44 Action by appeals authority. ( a ) The Coordinator, acting in the capacity of Executive Secretary of the ARP, shall place administrative appeals of FOIA requests ready for adjudication on the agenda at the next occurring meeting of that Panel. The Executive Secretary shall provide the ARP membership with a summary of the request and issues raised on appeal for the Panel's consideration and make available to the Panel the complete administrative record of the request consisting of the request, the document(s) at issue (in redacted and full-text form), if any, and the findings and recommendations of the relevant components.
( b ) The ARP shall determine whether an appeal before the Panel is meritorious. The ARP may take action when a simple majority of the total membership is present. Issues shall be decided by a majority of the members present. In all cases of a divided vote, before the decision of the ARP becomes final, any member of the ARP may by written memorandum to the Executive Secretary of the ARP, refer such matters to the CIA Chief Data Officer (CDO) for resolution. In the event of a disagreement with any decision by the CDO, Directorate or Independent Office heads may appeal to the CIA Chief Operating Officer (COO) for a final Agency decision. The final Agency decision shall reflect the vote of the ARP, unless the CDO or COO disagrees with the ARP and makes a superseding final Agency decision.
( c ) Appeals of denials of requests for fee waivers or reductions and/or denial of requests for expedited processing shall go directly from the Coordinator to the Agency Release Panel for a final Agency determination.
#### § 947.783 Underground mining permit applications—minimum requirements for information on environmental resources.

Part 783 of this chapter, *Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Information on Environmental Resources,* shall apply to any person who submits an application to conduct underground coal mining operations.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1859

___________________________

Justin E. Riddle; Erin M. Riddle

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants

v.

Charter West Bank, A Nebraska Corporation

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Federal Reserve Bank, of Kansas City

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

 ____________

 Submitted: December 5, 2019

Filed: December 10, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Nebraska residents Justin and ErinRiddle appealfollowing the district court’s

1

adverse grant of summary judgment in their pro se civil action. For reversal, they

challenge the district court’s dismissal of their claim seeking relief under the Fair

Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). They also argue that the district court erred in

granting summary judgment on their claim for tortious interference with a business

relationship.

After careful review, we agree with the district court that the Riddles failed to

state a claim under the FCRA. See Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th

Cir. 2016) (grant of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion is reviewed de novo). Further,

we conclude that summary judgment was proper on the tortious interference claim. 

See Tusing v. Des MoinesIndep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 639 F.3d 507, 514 (8th Cir. 2011)

(summary judgment decision is reviewed de novo, viewing record in light most

favorable to non-moving party); see also Pettit v. Paxton, 583 N.W.2d 604, 609-11

(Neb. 1998) (discussing requirements of tortious interference claim under Nebraska

law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Nebraska.

-2-
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 130 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Natural Resources 

in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Mr. WESTERMAN (for himself and Mr. GRIJALVA) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Natural Resources in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Natural Re4 sources (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $17,602,284 for the One Hundred 

9 Eighteenth Congress. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 130 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $8,801,142 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2023, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

7 (2) not more than $8,801,142 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2024, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2025. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
National Centers for Environmental Information

          - Home
          - Contact Us
          - About NCEI
          - Help

NCEIStorm Events Database

#### Storm Events Database

                  - Data Access
                  - Search
                  -  Bulk Data Download (CSV) 
                  -  Storm Data Publication 
                  - Documentation
                  -  Database Details 
                  -  Version History 
                  -  Storm Data FAQ 
                  -  NOAA's NWS Documentation 
                  - Tornado EF Scale
                  - External Resources
                  - NOAA's SPC Reports
                  - NOAA's SPC WCM Page
                  - NOAA's NWS Damage Assessment Toolkit
                  - NOAA's Tsunami Database
                  - ESRI/FEMA Civil Air Patrol Images
                  - SHELDUS
                  - USDA Cause of Loss Data 

# Storm Events Database

NOAA Storm Data publication              -  The occurrence of storms and other significant weather phenomena having sufficient intensity to cause loss of life, injuries, significant property damage, and/or disruption to commerce; 
              -  Rare, unusual, weather phenomena that generate media attention, such as snow flurries in South Florida or the San Diego coastal area; and 
              -  Other significant meteorological events, such as record maximum or minimum temperatures or precipitation that occur in connection with another event. 
Database DetailsRegister your email address

#### Select State or Area

#### Narrative Text Search

[help and examples]

List all events from September 25version information pageContact NCEI

Privacy PolicyFOIAInformation QualityDisclaimerContact Us
#### Edward A. Fleckenstein, as Administrator D. B. N. of the Estate of Herbert T. Kerrigan, Deceased, Appellant, v. Harold A. Nehrbas et al., Trading as Parrish & Co., Respondents. In the Matter of the Estate of Herbert T. Kerrigan, Deceased. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Appellant.

In an action against stockbrokers (defendants Nehrbas et al., trading as Parrish *&*Co.) to recover damages by reason of their having guaranteed the decedent’s forged signatures on certain stock certificates, such guarantee having been procured by his widow prior to his death; and in a reopened accounting *812proceeding to recover such damages from the Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, the successor surety on the bond filed by the widow-administratrix, such action having been transferred from the Supreme Court to the Surrogate’s Court and having been consolidated with the accounting proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court, the said surety and the plaintiff Fleekeustein, as administrator *de bonis non*of the decedent’s estate, separately appeal, as limited by the briefs: (1) from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated August 14, 1961, as granted summary judgment in the action in favor of the defendant-stockbrokers (Parrish & Co.) and against plaintiff Fleckenstein and dismissed the action on the merits; and (2) as directed the said surety to interpose any further pleading and make any motion in the said accounting proceeding within six weeks after service upon it of a copy of the order. Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs, and motion of said defendant stockbrokers (Parrish & Co.) for summary judgment denied. In our opinion, there are issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment. If it be assumed that the complaint states a cause of action in negligence, it may be found that the administratrix’ alleged conversion of the stock certificates after their release from escrow was not a foreseeable risk of such release and, hence, the escrowees did not violate any claimed duty to the estate or to Parrish & Co. (cf. *Palsgraf*v. *Long Is. R. R. Co.,*248 N. Y. 339, 344; *Benenson*v. *National Sur. Co.,*260 N. Y. 299, 302-303). The record does not warrant a holding that as a matter of law the release of the stock certificates by the surety and the escrowees exculpated defendants Parrish *&*Co. from their antecedent acts in furthering the transfer of the decedent’s stock certificates. Several acts may occur to produce a result, one or more being the proximate cause (cf. *Carlock*v. *Westchester Light. Co.,*268 N. Y. 345, 349). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### AMERICAN PUBLISHERS’ CORP. v. MUNRO et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by American Publishers’ Corporation against George W. Munro and others.

No opinion. Motion granted, so far as to dismiss appeal, with $10 costs.
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Wilderness Study Areas (WSA)

Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)

Other Management Areas (OMA)

Suitable Wild and Scenic Rivers 

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 3-16: BLM Special Designations 

and Management Areas