alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-461-CV

5 STAR STORAGE, LLC APPELLANT

V.

PROJECT COMPLIANCE , LLC APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal. It

is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 4, 2010

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
§ 219.123 Early termination of research support: Evaluation of applications and proposals. ( a ) The department or agency head may require that Federal department or agency support for any project be terminated or suspended in the manner prescribed in applicable program requirements, when the department or agency head finds an institution has materially failed to comply with the terms of this policy.
( b ) In making decisions about supporting or approving applications or proposals covered by this policy the department or agency head may take into account, in addition to all other eligibility requirements and program criteria, factors such as whether the applicant has been subject to a termination or suspension under paragraph (a) of this section and whether the applicant or the person or persons who would direct or has/have directed the scientific and technical aspects of an activity has/have, in the judgment of the department or agency head, materially failed to discharge responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects (whether or not the research was subject to federal regulation).
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Parturition Areas

Crucial Winter

Crucial Yearlong

Spring/Summer/Fall

Winter/Yearlong

Yearlong

Herd Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 3-31: Bighorn Sheep 

Habitat Locations
§ 1800.42 Right of appeal and appeal procedures. ( a ) *Right of Appeal.* A right of administrative appeal exists whenever access to any requested record or any portion thereof is denied, no records are located in response to a request, or a request for a fee waiver is denied. NACIC will apprise all requesters in writing of their right to appeal such decisions to the Director, NACIC through the Coordinator.
( b ) *Requirements as to time and form.* Appeals of decisions must be received by the Coordinator within forty-five (45) days of the date of NACIC's initial decision. NACIC may, for good cause and as a matter of administrative discretion, permit an additional thirty (30) days for the submission of an appeal. All appeals shall be in writing and addressed as specified in § 1800.3. All appeals must identify the documents or portions of documents at issue with specificity and may present such information, data, and argument in support as the requester may desire.
( c ) *Exceptions.* No appeal shall be accepted if the requester has outstanding fees for information services at this or another federal agency. In addition, no appeal shall be accepted if the information in question has been the subject of a review within the previous two (2) years or is the subject of pending litigation in the federal courts.
( d ) *Receipt, recording, and tasking.* NACIC shall promptly record each request received under this part, acknowledge receipt to the requester in writing, and thereafter effect the necessary taskings to the office(s) which originated or has an interest in the record(s) subject to the appeal.
( e ) *Time for response.* NACIC shall attempt to complete action on an appeal within twenty (20) days of the date of receipt. The volume of requests, however, may require that NACIC request additional time from the requester pursuant to § 1800.33. In such event, NACIC will inform the requester of the right to judicial review.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—BUDGET AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
### §101333. Criteria for providing housing

The Secretary shall maintain criteria under which housing is provided to employees of the Service. The Secretary shall examine the criteria with respect to the circumstances under which the Service requires an employee to occupy Federal Government quarters, so as to provide necessary services or protect Federal Government property or because of a lack of availability of non-Federal housing in a geographic area.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3127.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101333 | 16 U.S.C. 17o(3). | Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(a)(3), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4190. |

Section

The words "The Secretary shall maintain" are substituted for "On November 12, 1996, the Secretary shall review and revise the existing", and the word "existing" is omitted, to eliminate obsolete words.
T 28 N

R 98 W 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 R 61 W 60

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

T 12 N

Lusk

£¤85

£¤287

£¤18

£¤26

£¤30

£¤20

£¤85

£¤85

£¤20

¬«34

¬«487

¬«220

¬«789 ¬«130

¬«230

¬«59

¬«789

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

0 10 20 40

Miles

0 20 40 10

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments o NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Basin Soils (7 - 9 in. Precipitation Zone)

High Elevation Soils (15 - 19 in. Precipitation Zone)

Mid-Elevation Soils (10 - 14 in. Precipitation Zone)

Lower Elevation Soils (15 - 17 in. Precipitation Zone)

Stabilized Dunes (10 - 14 in. Precipitation Zone)

Rawlins Field Office

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 3-15: Rawlins Soil

/Precipitation Zones
#### § 22.200 Purpose.

This subpart provides the bases for determining the appropriate type of instrument in a given situation.
#### § 245.20 Purpose.

When ESCAT is implemented, a system of traffic priorities may be required to make optimum use of airspace, consistent with air defense requirements. The EATPL is a list of priorities that may be used for the movement of air traffic in a defined area. Priorities shall take precedence in the order listed and subdivisions within priorities are equal.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CyberOptics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Kathleen P. Iverson, Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey A. Bertelsen, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/   Kathleen P. IversonKathleen P. Iverson
Chief Executive Officer
March 7, 2008/s/   Jeffrey A. BertelsenJeffrey A. BertelsenChief Financial Officer
March 7, 2008










---
#### Sylvia Brown et al., Respondents, v. Edward Murphy et al., Defendants, and Surface Transit, Inc., Appellant.

— Order, entered on November 7, 1962, denying the motion of defendant Surface Transit, Inc., for a severance of the actions set forth in the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs, with leave to Surface to renew its motion, if so advised, after pretrial proceedings and upon a showing that there is no actual or substantial superimposition of injuries. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
§ 2001.31 Systematic declassification review. ( a ) *General.* Agencies shall establish systematic review programs for those records containing information exempted from automatic declassification. This includes individual records as well as file series of records. Agencies shall prioritize their review of such records in accordance with priorities established by the NDC.
Exhibit 32.1








The following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 and is not filed as provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission.




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics Research Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:




(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 9, 2011
/s/ James P. ReganChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 241.4 Eligibility. ( a ) To be eligible for an ITEP detail, a DoD or private sector employee must: ( 1 ) Work in the field of IT;
( 2 ) Be equivalent at the GS-11 level or above
( 3 ) Be considered an exceptional employee, meet or exceed successful performance levels and makes significant contributions towards achieving organizational goals;
( 4 ) Be expected to assume increased IT responsibilities in the future;
( 5 ) Be currently employed by an organization interested in participating in the ITEP pilot; and
( 6 ) Obtain supervisor and company approval before an employee can participate in an ITEP detail.
( b ) In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the DoD employee must be serving under a career or career-conditional appointment or an appointment of equivalent tenure in the excepted service.
( c ) The private sector employee must meet citizenship requirements for Federal employment in accordance with 5 CFR 7.3 and 338.101, as well as any other statutory requirements. When a position requires a security clearance, the person must possess, or be able to obtain an appropriate security clearance.
( d ) Proposed assignment meets applicable requirements of section 209(b) of the E-Government Act of 2002.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1240 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4121) to protect an individual’s 

ability to access contraceptives and to engage in contraception and to 

protect a health care provider’s ability to provide contraceptives, contraception, and information related to contraception. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2024 

Ms. MANNING submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4121) to protect 

an individual’s ability to access contraceptives and to 

engage in contraception and to protect a health care 

provider’s ability to provide contraceptives, contraception, 

and information related to contraception. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution, the House shall proceed to the consideration in 

3 the House of the bill (H.R. 4121) to protect an individ4 ual’s ability to access contraceptives and to engage in con5 traception and to protect a health care provider’s ability 

6 to provide contraceptives, contraception, and information 

7 related to contraception. The bill shall be considered as 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1240 IH 

1 read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are 

2 waived. The previous question shall be considered as or3 dered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 

4 passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

5 of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

6 ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy 

7 and Commerce or their respective designees; and (2) one 

8 motion to recommit. 

9 SEC. 2. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to 

10 the consideration of H.R. 4121. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
January 10, 2011

Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents Page 18 

Table 12. Strategies to Improve Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy

Strategies Examples

Use a multidisciplinary team approach

Provide an accessible, trusting health care team

• Nurses, social workers, pharmacists, and medication managers

Establish a trusting relationship with the patient

Establish readiness to start ART

Identify potential barriers to adherence prior to 

starting ART

• Psychosocial issues

• Active substance abuse or at high risk of relapse

• Low literacy level

• Busy daily schedule and/or travel away from home

• Lack of disclosure of HIV diagnosis

• Skepticism about ART

• Lack of prescription drug coverage

Provide resources for the patient • Referrals for mental health and/or substance abuse treatment

• Resources to obtain prescription drug coverage

• Pillboxes

Involve the patient in antiretroviral (ARV)

regimen selection

• For each option, review potential side effects, dosing frequency, 

pill burden, storage requirements, food requirements, and 

consequences of nonadherence

Assess adherence at every clinic visit • Use a simple checklist the patient can complete in the waiting 

room

• Have other members of the health care team also assess 

adherance

• Ask the patient open-ended questions (e.g., In the last 3 days, 

please tell me how you took your medicines.)

Identify the type of nonadherence • Failure to fill the prescription(s)

• Failure to take the right dose(s) at the right time(s)

• Nonadherence to food requirements

Identify reasons for nonadherence • Adverse effects from medications

• Complexity of regimen (pill burden, dosing frequency, etc.)

• Difficulty swallowing large pills

• Forgetfulness

• Failure to understand dosing instructions

• Inadequate understanding of drug resistance and its relationship 

to adherence

• Pill fatigue

• Other potential barriers (see list above) 

Assess and simplify regimen, if possible
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, David A. Dodd, certify that

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of
Serologicals Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: June 2, 2004

/s/ DAVID A. DODD
---------------------------
David A. Dodd
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.48 N 77.37 W Meters AGL
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0000030831
[NAME] DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          SEP-30-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-2000
[CASH]                                         181,772
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                  468,741
[ALLOWANCES]                                    10,883
[INVENTORY]                                    970,982
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             1,668,773
[PP&E]                                       5,613,419
[DEPRECIATION]                               3,655,559
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               3,648,871
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          409,182
[BONDS]                                      1,693,677
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                         1,498
[OTHER-SE]                                   1,544,514
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 3,648,871
[SALES]                                      1,805,742
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                             1,805,742
[CGS]                                        1,302,128
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                1,643,923
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              92,970
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 68,849
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             68,849
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    68,849
[EPS-BASIC]                                        .03
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .03
</TABLE>
Amendment No. 1 to Master Services Agreement, dated December 1, 2005



 Exhibit 10.17 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment No. 1 to Master Services Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into this 1st day of December 2005
between Hawaiian Telecom Services Company, Inc. (“HTSC”) and Verizon Select Services Inc. (“VSSI”). 
  
 WHEREAS, HTSC and VSSI are parties to that certain Master Services Agreement effective May 2, 2005 (the “Agreement”);

  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, VSSI
provides HTSC with certain communications and related services; and 
  
 WHEREAS,
the Parties wish to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional two months and modify certain rates set forth in the Agreement, 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Agreement. 

  

	2.	In Section 1 of the Agreement, the term “Initial Term” is amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

  

	    	“Initial Term” shall mean the period commencing on the Effective Date and expiring at 12:01 am Eastern Time, Saturday, April 1, 2006. 


 

	3.	The first sentence of Annex A, Price Schedule is amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

  

	    	There shall be a monthly fee of $855,000 for the period from the Effective Date through January 31, 2006, and a monthly fee of $956,000 for the period February 1, 2006
until the end of the Initial Term, conditioned upon: 

  

	4.	Except as expressly amended herein, all terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party has caused its duly authorized representative to execute this Amendment on such Party’s behalf on the
date first set forth above. 
  

									
	Verizon Select Services Inc.	 	 	 	 Hawaiian Telecom Services Company, Inc.

					
	By:	 	/s/    Stephen E. Smith	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    Michael S. Ruley
	Title:	 	Authorized Representative	 	 	 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer