alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2.1 Purpose. Section 809 of Public Law 101-510, “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991,” as amended by section 811 of Public Law 102-484, “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993” and Public Law 103-160, “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994,” authorizes the Secretary of Defense to conduct the Defense Acquisition Pilot Program. In accordance with section 809 of Public Law 101-510, the Secretary may designate defense acquisition programs for participation in the Defense Acquisition Pilot Program. ( a ) The purpose of the pilot programs is to determine the potential for increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the acquisition process. Pilot programs shall be conducted in accordance with the standard commercial, industrial practices. As used in this policy, the term “standard commercial, industrial practice” refers to any acquisition management practice, process, or procedure that is used by commercial companies to produce and sell goods and services in the commercial marketplace. This definition purposely implies a broad range of potential activities to adopt commercial practices, including regulatory and statutory streamlining, to eliminate unique Government requirements and practices such as government-unique contracting policies and practices, government-unique specifications and standards, and reliance on cost determination rather than price analysis.
( b ) Standard commercial, industrial practices include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Innovative contracting policies and practices;
( 2 ) Performance and commercial specifications and standards;
( 3 ) Innovative budget policies;
( 4 ) Establishing fair and reasonable prices without cost data;
( 5 ) Maintenance of long-term relationships with quality suppliers;
( 6 ) Acquisition of commercial and non-developmental items (including components); and
( 7 ) Other best commercial practices.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 16, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40641

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUVENTINO IVAN ALVARADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-02-CR-333-1

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juventino Ivan Alvarado appeals the sentence he received

upon his conviction of possessing cocaine with intent to

distribute it, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). 

Alvarado contends that the district court erred by not

applying the safety-valve provision of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2,

rather than sentencing him to the mandatory minimum provided by

21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Alvarado is not entitled to relief

because he has not shown that the district court was clearly
No. 03-40641

-2-

erroneous in finding that he failed to provide truthful relevant

information to the Government. See United States v. Miller,

179 F.3d 961, 964-65 (5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
      32.01**






Exhibit
      32.01 - Certification of Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer




**CERTIFICATION
      OF INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




I,
      Catherine Thompson, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of VINOBLE, INC (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1) 
      the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this
      certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with
      the
      requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m);




and




(2) 
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date:
      November 21, 2005


/s/
      Catherine Thompson


Catherine
      Thompson


Interim
      Chief Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer
#### § 220.5 Records available.

Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1095(c), facilities of the uniformed services, when requested, shall make available to representatives of any third party payer from which the United States seeks payment under 10 U.S.C. 1095 for inspection and review appropriate health care records (or copies of such records) of individuals for whose care payment is sought. Appropriate records which will be made available are records which document that the services which are the subject of the claims for payment under 10 U.S.C. 1095 were provided as claimed and were provided in a manner consistent with permissible terms and conditions of the third party payer's plan. This is the sole purpose for which patient care records will be made available. Records not needed for this purpose will not be made available.
### §8982. Availability of vision benefits

(a) The Office shall establish and administer a program through which an eligible individual may obtain vision coverage to supplement coverage available through chapter 89.

(b) The Office shall determine, in the exercise of its reasonable discretion, the financial requirements for qualified companies to participate in the program.

(c) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit the availability of vision benefits provided by health benefits plans under chapter 89.

(Added Pub. L. 108–496, §3, Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 4007.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 23, 2004, and applicable to contracts that take effect with respect to the calendar year 2006, see section 7 of Pub. L. 108–496, set out as a note under section 8951 of this title.
Exhibit 13.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Caledonia Mining Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), that I, Stefan E. Hayden, President and Chief Executive Officer of  Caledonia , certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.
 
 
 By:           (signed)S. E. Hayden
 Stefan E. Hayden, President and Chief Executive Officer
 Caledonia Mining Corporation
 
 Date:           April 30, 2014
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by Stefan E. Hayden and will be retained by Caledonia Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Caledonia Mining Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), that I, Steven Curtis, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of  Caledonia , certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.
 
 
 By:   (signed)Steven Curtis
 Steven Curtis, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
 Caledonia Mining Corporation
 
 Date:           April 30, 2014
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by Steven Curtis and will be retained by Caledonia Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Tele-Consultants, Inc. Under Contract No. NOO 178-05-D-4611 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61378

James S. DelSordo, Esq.

Argus Legal, PLLC Manassas, VA Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Kara M. Klass, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: August 7, 2019

dministrative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 61378, Appeal ofTele-Consultants, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
### §3136. Regulations

The Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations to carry out the purpose of this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title IV, §402(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1160.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 9 months after Oct. 13, 1978, and congressional review of provisions of sections 401 through 412 of Pub. L. 95–454, see section 415(a)(1), (b), of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 3131 of this title.
#### In the Matter of American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Petitioner, v. Supreme Court of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

—■ Proceeding unanimously dismissed, without costs. The issue raised herein is properly reviewable on appeal and therefore the writ will not lie. Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### §§ 1699.112-1699.129 [Reserved]
§ 310.8 Civil remedies. In addition to the right to judicial review after a denied appeal for access to or amendment of a record, the requester has the right to bring a civil action against the Department if the Department: ( a ) Fails to maintain a record concerning the individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness and completeness as is necessary to assure fairness in any determination relating to the qualifications, character, rights, opportunities of, or benefits to the individual that may be made on the basis of such record, and consequently a determination is made which is adverse to the individual; or
( b ) Fails to comply with any other provision of the Privacy Act or this rule, in such a way as to have an adverse effect on the individual.
#### HOPCROFT, Appellant, v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Action by Harry E. Hopcroft as administrator against the Interurban Street Railway Company. G. S. Daniels, for appellant. J. M. O’Neill, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                  |   |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | /s/ Craig T Dunham                    |   |
|   |   |   | Craig T Dunham                        |   |
|   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |   |                                  |   |
|   |   |   |                                  |   |
|   |   |   | /s/ Richard A. Johnson                |   |
|   |   |   | Richard A. Johnson                    |   |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer               |   |
|   |   |   |                                  |   |

----
*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
§ 1659.1 Claims. ( a ) Claims for payment of actual and reasonable expenses of: ( 1 ) Emergency medical care, including hospitalization of registrants who suffer illness or injury; and
( 2 ) The transportation and burial of the remains of registrants who suffer death while acting under orders issued by or under the authority of the Director of Selective Service will be paid in accordance with the provisions of this section.
( b ) Claims for payment of expenses incurred for the purposes set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall be presented to the Director of Selective Service.
( c ) ( 1 ) The term *emergency medical care, including hospitalization,* as used in this section, shall be construed to mean such medical care or hospitalization that normally must be rendered promptly after an occurrence of illness or injury. Discharge by a physician or facility subsequent to such medical care or hospitalization shall be justification to terminate the period of emergency.
( 2 ) The death of a registrant shall be deemed to have occurred while acting under orders issued by or under the authority of the Director of Selective Service if it results directly from an illness or injury suffered by the registrant while so acting and occurs prior to the completion of an emergency medical care, including hospitalization, occasioned by such illness or injury.
( d ) No such claim shall be paid unless it is presented within the period of one year from the date on which the expenses were incurred.
( e ) No such claim shall be allowed in case it is determined that the cause of injury, illness, or death was due to negligence or misconduct of the registrant.
( f ) Burial expenses shall not exceed the maximum prescribed in Section 11 of the Military Selective Service Act in any one case.
( g ) Payment of such claims when allowed shall be made only: ( 1 ) Directly to the person or facility with which the expenses were incurred; or
( 2 ) By reimbursement to the registrant, a relative of the registrant, or the legal representative of the registrant's estate, for original payment of such expenses.
[47 FR 4664, Feb. 1, 1982]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ROUNDY'S,
INC. FORM 10-K 405 FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 12-28-96 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                      40,342,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               98,593,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                155,562,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           305,056,300
<PP&E>                                     189,575,900
<DEPRECIATION>                              90,840,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             434,641,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      214,558,400
<BONDS>                                     93,614,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,341,500
<OTHER-SE>                                 102,386,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               434,641,000
<SALES>                                  2,579,010,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,583,504,900
<CGS>                                    2,333,216,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,333,216,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           218,608,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             5,302,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,479,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             17,897,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,630,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,267,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,267,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# TablesLibrary (4)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6824
JOHN EDWARD STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-04-21860-0) Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 30, 2005 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Edward Stone, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., John Eric Kaufmann, MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: John Edward Stone appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stone v. Ozmint , No. CA-04-21860-0 (D.S.C. filed May 16, 2005 & entered May 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 2, 1998, and the condensed
consolidated statement of operations of the Company for the 13 weeks ended    
May 2, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                          18,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    163,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,700
<PP&E>                                         137,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 396,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,300
<BONDS>                                        127,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   396,100
<SALES>                                        206,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               206,200
<CGS>                                          155,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,300)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.18)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF
                          CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION



At December 31, 2003 the subsidiaries of Capstead Mortgage Corporation were as
follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                                       STATE OF
                                                                                                      DOMICILE
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PARENT COMPANY
  SUBSIDIARY
<S>                                                                                                <C>

Capstead Mortgage Corporation ("CMC")...................................................            Maryland
   Capstead Capital Corporation.........................................................            Delaware
   Capstead Securities Corporation IV...................................................            Delaware
   CMC Securities Corporation I.........................................................            Nevada
   CMC Securities Corporation III.......................................................            Delaware
   CMC Securities Corporation IV........................................................            Delaware
   CMCP Properties, Inc.................................................................            Delaware
     CMCP - Roswell LLC (1).............................................................            Delaware
     CMCP - Williamsburg LLC (1)........................................................            Delaware
     CMCP - Pinecastle LLC (1)..........................................................            Delaware
     CMCP - Montrose LLC (1)............................................................            Delaware
     CMCP - Texas, Inc. (1).............................................................            Delaware
       CMCP - Club Hill L.P. (2)........................................................            Texas
     CMCP - Florida SPE, Inc. (1).......................................................            Delaware
       CMCP - Island Lake LLC (3).......................................................            Delaware
   Capstead Inc.(4).....................................................................            Delaware
</Table>


(1)      CMC Properties, Inc. owns 100% of the indicated entity.

(2)      CMCP Properties, Inc. owns 99.99% of the indicated entity with the
         remainder held by CMCP - Texas, Inc.

(3)      CMCP - Florida SPE, Inc. owns 100% of the indicated entity.

(4)      CMC owns all of the issued and outstanding preferred stock.