alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August!26,!2014

The!Honorable!Anthony!R.!Foxx

Secretary

Department!of!Transportation

1200!New!Jersey!Avenue!SE

Washington,!DC!20590

RE:!Norwegian!Air!International!– Docket!No.!OSTQ2013Q0204

Dear!Secretary!Foxx:

I!am!a!pilot working!for!Norwegian!Air!International!and!its!affiliates,!I!am writing!in!support!of!

Norwegian!Air!International’s!(NAI)!exemption!and!foreign!air!carrier!permit!applications currently!

pending!before!the U.S. Department!of!Transportation.!!!I urge!the!Department!to!grant!NAI’s!

applications without!further!delay.

I can!assure!you!that!the!allegations!made!by!pilots!unions!and!others!calling!into!question!Norwegian’s!

labor!practices!and!safety!records!have!no!basis!in!fact.!!

I!am!an!experienced!Training!Captain!with!12,000!hours!flying!and!over!6000!hours!in!command!of!B737!

and!B757!aircraft.!I!chose!to!move!to!Norwegian!and!NAI!because!of!the!introduction!of!the!B787.!

Previously!I!had!flown!for!KLM!UK,!Astraeus!Airlines!and!Titan!Airlines,!I!find!it!exceptionally!insulting!

that!my!professionalism!should!be!called!into!question!in!an!attempt!to!undermine!NAI’s!application.!

Norwegian!is!the!forth!airline!I!have!worked!for,!and!I!have!to!say!it!is!by!far!the!most!professional.!My!

colleagues!mainly!come!from!European!airlines!such!as!KLM,!Austrian,!Virgin!Atlantic,!Atlas!and!BA!

Openskies, I!am!sure!that!they!will!feel!equally!hurt!by!the!unfounded!allegations!of!ALPA.

Our!training!to!fly!the!B787!was!conducted!by!Boeing,!and!was!excellent. The!Dreamliner!is!a!stateQofQ

theQart!aircraft!and!is!maintained!on!line!by!Boeing. I!am!amazed!that!ALPA!thinks!that!this!is!not!

acceptable,!whom else!would!they!recommend?

Norwegian!is!attempting!to!do!something!new!and!exciting,!and!ALPA!are!trying!to!undermine it!on!

behalf!of!our!competition.

We!urge the!U.S. Department!of!Transportation!to!swiftly!approve!NAI’s!exemption!and!foreign!air!

carrier!permit!applications.!!! Let!us!continue!to!fly!– in!accordance!with!the!Open%Skies regime.!!!!!!!

Yours!sincerely,!

Tom!Wilson BEng!(Aeronautical Engineering, London)
EXHIBIT 23.1


Document: P:\DOC\HEPK.DOC
                                                       -64-

<PAGE>



                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-76668  of Hallwood  Energy  Partners,  L.P.  on Form S-2 of our report  dated
February  28,  1997,  appearing  in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Hallwood
Energy Partners, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 1996.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 20, 1997

Document: P:\DOC\HEPK.DOC
                                                       -65-

<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.2
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED**
 
 I, Stephen J. Alesia, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hurco Companies, Inc.; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
 
 /s/ Stephen J. Alesia
 Stephen J. Alesia
 Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
 January 19, 2005
#### § 161.9 DoD benefits.

The benefits population is defined by roles. There are roles that have a direct affiliation with the DoD, such as an active duty Service member, or those that have an association to someone who is affiliated, such as the spouse of an active duty member. This section reflects benefit eligibility established by law and associated DoD policy, and addresses the roles that receive benefits. These benefits can include civilian health care, direct care at an MTF, commissary, exchange, and MWR, which are conveyed on the authorized CAC or uniformed services ID card. Sections 161.10 through 161.22 identify the categories of eligible persons and their authorized benefits as they would be recorded in the Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System (DEERS).

(a) Sections 161.10 through 161.22 reflect the eligibility of persons for the benefits administered by the uniformed services in accordance with 10 U.S.C. chapter 55 and DoD Instruction 1330.17, “Armed Services Commissary Operations” (available at *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/133017p.pdf*); DoD Instruction 1330.21, “Armed Services Exchange Regulations” (available at *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/133021p.pdf*); and DoD Instruction 1015.10.

(1) Additional benefits may be authorized by DoD Instruction 1330.17, DoD Instruction 1330.21, and DoD Instruction 1015.10, but are not printed on the DoD ID card; access to benefits may be facilitated in another manner in accordance with DoD Instruction 1330.17, DoD Instruction 1330.21, and DoD Instruction 1015.10.

(2) Installation commanders may never authorize benefits beyond those allowed by DoD Instruction 1330.17, DoD Instruction 1330.21, and DoD Instruction 1015.10, but they may deny privileges indicated when base support facilities cannot handle the burden imposed as authorized by DoD Instruction 1330.17, DoD Instruction 1330.21, and DoD Instruction 1015.10.

(b) A sponsor's begin date for benefit eligibility is based on the date the sponsor begins their affiliation with the Department.

(c) A dependent's begin date for benefit eligibility is based on the date the dependent becomes associated as an eligible dependent to an eligible sponsor.

(d) Guidance on benefit eligibility begin dates and ID card expiration dates based on benefits will be maintained at *http://www.cac.mil.*

(e) Refer to the figure 1 to this subpart for abbreviations for the tables in this subpart.

| CHC | civilian health care. |
| --- | --- |
| DC | direct care at MTFs. |
| C | commissary privileges. |
| MWR | MWR privileges. |
| E | exchange privileges. |

Figure 1 to Subpart C of Part 161—Benefits Table Abbreviations
### §8149. Regulations

The Secretary of Labor may prescribe rules and regulations necessary for the administration and enforcement of this subchapter including rules and regulations for the conduct of hearings under section 8124 of this title. The rules and regulations shall provide for an Employees' Compensation Appeals Board of three individuals designated or appointed by the Secretary with authority to hear and, subject to applicable law and the rules and regulations of the Secretary, make final decisions on appeals taken from determinations and awards with respect to claims of employees. In adjudicating claims under section 8146 of this title, the Secretary may determine the nature and extent of the proof and evidence required to establish the right to benefits under this subchapter without regard to the date of injury or death for which claim is made.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 555; Pub. L. 90–83, §1(71), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 213.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 783 (less last 9 words). | Sept. 7, 1916, ch. 458, §32 (less last 9 words), 39 Stat. 749. |
| | [Uncodified]. | 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §3 (2d sentence), eff. July 16, 1946, 60 Stat. 1095. |
| | [Uncodified]. | 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 19, §2, eff. May 24, 1950, 64 Stat. 1272. |

Statutes at Large

The words "administration and" are added for clarity.

Administration of this subchapter was transferred to the Secretary of Labor by section 1 of 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 19, 64 Stat. 1271 (see section 8145).

The first sentence of section 2 of 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 19 is omitted as executed. The word "employees" is coextensive with and substituted for "employees of the Federal Government or of the District of Columbia" in view of the definition of "employee" in section 8101.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

| Section of title 5 | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8149 | 5 App.: 783. | July 4, 1966, Pub. L. 89–488, §§11(a), 12, 80 Stat. 255. |

In the first sentence, the words "section 8124 of this title" are substituted for "section 36" to reflect the codification of that section in title 5, United States Code.

In the second sentence, the word "adjudicating" is substituted for "in the adjudication of". The words "section 8146 of this title" and "this subchapter" are substituted for "section 42 of this Act" and "this Act", respectively, to reflect the codification of the Federal Employees' Compensation Act in title 5, United States Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Personnel Not Affected by 1967 Increase

Increases authorized under amendment by section 1(71) of Pub. L. 90–83 not applicable to specified personnel, see section 7 of Pub. L. 90–83, set out as a note under section 8103 of this title.
AFS-10-167-E 

March 12, 2010 

 Exemption No. 9704A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2008-0332 

Mr. Ian A. Shavitz 

Counsel for Inter American University of Puerto Rico 

Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP 

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW. 

Washington, DC 20036

Dear Mr. Shavitz: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9704. 

It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated February 12, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Inter American University of Puerto Rico (Inter American) for an extension of 

Exemption No. 9704. That exemption from § 61.129(a)(4) and part 141, appendix D, 

paragraph 5(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Inter American’s commercial 

pilot students to satisfy their cross-country flight of no less than 300 nautical miles (nm ) total 

distance, with landings at a minimum of three points, one of which is a straight-line distance 

of at least 150 nm from the original departure point. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Inter American. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9704 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and limitations below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. The cross-country flight must be accomplished as a solo flight. 

2. The commercial student’s logbook must be endorsed by the certificated flight 

instructor (CFI) as follows: “I certify that (INSERT STUDENT’S FIRST NAME, 

MIDDLE INITIAL, LAST NAME), (INSERT PILOT CERTIFICATE), (INSERT 

CERTIFICATE NUMBER), has satisfactorily completed the solo single-engine crosscountry flight in Puerto Rico in accordance with the provision of FAA Exemption 

No. 9704 on (INSERT DATE). S/S (INSERT DATE) (INSERT CFI NAME), 

(INSERT CFI CERTIFICATE NUMBER), EXPIRATION DATE (INSERT DATE). 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9704 to May 31, 2012, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 28, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-03-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-28-2000
<CASH>                                             249,173
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,865,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500,000
<INVENTORY>                                     27,930,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,276,999
<PP&E>                                          75,268,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,956,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,265,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,252,614
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           392,732
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,136,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,265,074
<SALES>                                        106,017,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,017,817
<CGS>                                           63,881,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,881,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,328,368
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,803,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,415,430
<INCOME-TAX>                                        13,050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,402,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,402,380
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.07



</TABLE>
#### Ellen Callahan, appellant, v. E. J. Welter, sheriff of La Salle county, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,423.

Replevin to recover personal property levied upon by- defendant sheriff. Judgment for the defendant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. Edgar Eldredge, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924. *Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 27, 1925.

Rehearing denied April 29, 1925.

W. A. Panneek, for appellant.

Arthur H. Shay and J. E. Malone, Jr., for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, Group Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Duke Energy Carolinas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Carolinas.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID L.
HAUSER                     
|David L. Hauser                            
|Group Executive and Chief Financial Officer
|May 13, 2009
# C_2008079EN.01002601.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/26

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 February 2008 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-266/04) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Withdrawal of fruit and vegetables - Check on all products withdrawn - Arable crops and beef premiums - Period of 24 months)

(2008/C 79/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, abogado del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Visaggio, S. Pardo Quintillán and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2004/457/EC of 29 April 2004 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2004 L 156, p. 48, corrigendum in OJ 2004 L 202, p. 35), inasmuch as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by Spain

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2004/457/EC of 29 April 2004 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2004 L 156, p. 48, corrigendum in OJ 2004 L 202, p. 35), inasmuch as it excludes expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain in the Autonomous Communities of the Basque Region and La Rioja in financial year 1998/1999 relating to arable crops and beef premiums, on the one hand, and expenditure incurred before 22 March 2000 by the Kingdom of Spain in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Region in financial year 1999/2000 relating to arable crops and beef premiums, on the other; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2004/457/EC of 29 April 2004 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2004 L 156, p. 48, corrigendum in OJ 2004 L 202, p. 35), inasmuch as it excludes expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain in the Autonomous Communities of the Basque Region and La Rioja in financial year 1998/1999 relating to arable crops and beef premiums, on the one hand, and expenditure incurred before 22 March 2000 by the Kingdom of Spain in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Region in financial year 1999/2000 relating to arable crops and beef premiums, on the other;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 28.8.2004.

1

---
### §§1027 to 1029. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §341(a), Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 318

Section 1027, acts July 22, 1937, ch. 517, title IV, §53, 50 Stat. 532; Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 964, §3, 60 Stat. 1064, related to fees and commissions.

Section 1028, acts July 22, 1937, ch. 517, title IV, §54, 50 Stat. 532; Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 964, §3, 60 Stat. 1064; July 26, 1947, ch. 339, §1(b), 61 Stat. 493, related to application of provisions to territories.

Section 1029, acts July 22, 1937, ch. 517, title IV, §55, 50 Stat. 533; Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 964, §3, 60 Stat. 1064, related to separability of provisions.

For subject matter of sections 1027 to 1029 of this title, see section 1921 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective one hundred and twenty days after Aug. 8, 1961, or such earlier date as the provisions of chapter 50 of this title are made effective by regulations of Secretary of Agriculture, see section 341(a) of Pub. L. 87–128, set out as a note under section 1921 of this title.

Sections repealed effective Oct. 15, 1961, by former section 300.1 of Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, see Effective Date note set out under section 1921 of this title.