alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           5,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                        93
<INVENTORY>                                     14,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,504
<PP&E>                                          53,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,398
<BONDS>                                         16,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           775
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,012
<SALES>                                         58,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,671
<CGS>                                           45,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    65
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,959
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,703
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 15

- 00222

- CV IN THE ESTATE OF Carlos AGUILAR , Deceased From the County Court at Law No

. 2 , Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012

- PB4

- 0000 48

- L2 Honorable Jesus Garza , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 3, 2015 MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION Appellants Vanessa Arce and Eudelia Aguilar filed a notice of appeal from a probate court order dated February 13, 2015. In response, appellee Clarissa Aguilar filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, arguing the order from which app ellants are attempting to appeal is not a final, appealable order, but is merely a discovery order that is not appealable. We grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final ju dgments. De Ayala v. Mackie , 193 S.W.3d 575, 578 (Tex. 2006) (citing Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001)). A judgment or order is final for purposes of appeal if it actually disposes of all pending parties and claims before the court

. Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195. In the probate context, however, there may be multiple judgments on discrete issues that are final for purposes on appeal. De Ayala ,04

- 15

- 00222

- CV

- 2

- 193 S.W.3d at 578. However, not every interlocutory order in a probate case is appealable. Id. In De Ayala , the supreme court held that if there is no express statute declaring the phase of the probate proceeding to be final and appealable, a probate court order is final and appealable only if it disposes of all parties or issues in a particu lar phase of the proceedings. Id. at 579.
Here , the order appellants seek to appeal concerns discovery issues. Because w e found no statute declaring such an order appealable under the Probate Code, it d id not appear that the order dispose d of all parti es or issues in a particular phase of the proceedings , and we discovered no other statutory authority permitting an appeal from an interlocutory discovery order , we ordered appellants to file in this court, on or before May 18, 2015, a written response sho wing cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. ; see also T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. &
R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2014). We advised appellants that if they fail ed to satisfactorily respond within the time provided, the appeal would be dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a), (c). Appellants did not file a response. Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We order costs assessed against appellants.

PER CURIAM
#### § 310.4 Access exemptions.

DoD may deny an individual access to certain information about the individual that resides in a DoD Component's system of records when an exemption from the Privacy Act is claimed for the system of records and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations as described in § 310.12. When an exemption pursuant to subsection (j) or (k) of the Privacy Act exists, it will be listed in the SORN for the particular system in which the individual's information is located. Records compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding may be withheld pursuant to subsection (d)(5) of the Privacy Act.
#### § 2402.12 Disclaimer.

Nothing in this part shall be construed to entitle any person, as a right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10809

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDD C DOUGLAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:92-CR-141-1

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Edd C. Douglas, federal prisoner # 23799-077, appeals the district court’s

denial of his motions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction of his

sentence for drug trafficking conspiracy, possession with intent to manufacture

and distribute cocaine, money laundering, possession with intent to manufacture

and distribute cocaine base, possession with intent to distribute and distribution

of cocaine base, maintaining a place to manufacture and distribute a controlled

substance, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. However, Douglas died

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 14, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 08-10809 Document: 00511320536 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/14/2010
No. 08-10809

during the pendency of this appeal. Accordingly, his appeal is dismissed as

moot.

DISMISSED.

2

Case: 08-10809 Document: 00511320536 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/14/2010
#### Cornelius B. Chapman et al., Copartners Practicing Law under the Name of Chapman & Marko v. Frances M. Purdy et al., Individually and as Executrices of Herbert McL. Purdy, Deceased.

Motion for an enlargement of time granted insofar as to extend the defendants’ time to serve and file the record on appeal and appellants’ points to and including February 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the April 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. If appellants fail to comply with the condition imposed, the respondents may enter an order dismissing the appeal without notice to the appellants. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1344 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1344

Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is 
 in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain 
                               subpoena.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2024

Mrs. Luna (for herself, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. McCormick, Mr. Burchett, and 
 Mr. Alford) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is 
 in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain 
                               subpoena.

Whereas, on February 27, 2024, Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United 
        States, was duly served with a subpoena to produce a narrow and specific 
        set of materials possessed by the Department of Justice and related to 
        Special Counsel Robert K. Hur's investigation of President Joe Biden's 
        ``willful'' mishandling of classified documents to the Committee on the 
        Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Oversight 
        and Accountability of the House of Representatives in Washington, DC;
Whereas Attorney General Garland has, in disobedience of such subpoena, failed 
        to produce the set of materials; and
Whereas the set of materials possessed by the Department of Justice is material 
        and necessary in order that the House of Representatives may properly 
        execute the functions imposed on it and may obtain information necessary 
        as a basis for such legislative and other action as the House of 
        Representatives may deem necessary and proper: Now, therefore be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, 
        is found in contempt of the House of Representatives for 
        disobeying the February 27, 2024, subpoena; and
            (2) the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall 
        impose a fine, which may not be paid with appropriated funds, 
        on Attorney General Garland of $10,000 per day, until such time 
        as Attorney General Garland complies with the subpoena of the 
        House of Representatives by turning over the audio tapes.
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Americanarmies and battlefields in Europe.**
 
PDF | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:D 114.2:AR 5/4/2018
Item Number:0344 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001057767
 
May 21, 2018
Exhibit 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors
Cyanotech Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 33-63789, 33-55310 and 333-42484 on Form S-8 and
333-42486 and 333-101401 on Form S-3 of Cyanotech Corporation of our report dated May 2, 2003 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cyanotech
Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2003, which report is included in the 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Cyanotech Corporation. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report dated May 2, 2003 relating to the financial statement schedule of Cyanotech Corporation and subsidiaries in the aforementioned 2003 annual report on
Form 10-K, which report is included in said Form 10-K.

Our
report dated May 2, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cyanotech Corporation and subsidiaries and our report dated May 2, 2003 with respect
to the financial statement schedule of Cyanotech Corporation and subsidiaries contain an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has
limited sources of additional liquidity to enable it to sufficiently liquidate its debts as they be come due, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/
KPMG LLP
Honolulu, Hawaii
July 14, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### § 286.6 Preservation of records.

Each DoD Component shall preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives under this part, as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized pursuant to title 44 of the United States Code or the General Records Schedule 4.2 of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Records shall not be disposed of or destroyed while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the FOIA.
Exhibit 11
                 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>

                                                   Three Months Ended                          Twelve Months Ended
                                                        October 31,                                  October 31,
                                          ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                2003                   2002                   2003                  2002
                                          ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands, except per share amount)
                                            Basic     Diluted      Basic     Diluted     Basic     Diluted      Basic     Diluted
                                          ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------

<S>                                       <C>          <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>      <C>          <C>
Net loss                                  $      574   $   574    $ (1,760)   $(1,760)   $ 462      $ 462    $ (8,263)    $ (8,263)

Weighted average shares
  outstanding                                  5,578     5,578       5,583      5,583    5,582      5,582       5,583        5,583

Assumed issuances under
  stock options plans                             --        34          --         --       --         --          --           --
                                          ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               5,578     5,612       5,583      5,583    5,582      5,582       5,583        5,583

Loss per common share                     $     0.10   $  0.10   $   (0.32)   $ (0.32)  $ 0.08     $ 0.08      $(1.48)      $(1.48)
                                          =========== ========= =========== ========== ======== ============ =========== ===========

</TABLE>
# C_2023039EN.01001701.xml

| 1.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/17

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2023/C 39/04)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 21.12.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 21.12-2022 – 31.12.2022 |
| Member State | European Union (All Member States) |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/1N2AB. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus Morhua) |
| Zone | Norwegian waters of 1 and 2 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | --- |
| Reference number | 16/TQ109 |

Date and time of closure

21.12.2022

Duration

21.12-2022 – 31.12.2022

Member State

European Union (All Member States)

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/1N2AB.

Species

Cod (Gadus Morhua)

Zone

Norwegian waters of 1 and 2

Type(s) of fishing vessels

---

Reference number

16/TQ109

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129132 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129132 

 COA: 260780 

Gratiot CC: 04-004769-FH 

WALLACE EUGENE ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2005 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
Exhibit 10.4

                                  LARRY SOSTAD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      818 - 470 Granville Street
                                                  Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6C 1V5




                                                                January 30, 2005

Cantop Ventures Inc.
4252 Bonita Road, #151
Bonita, California
U.S.A. 91902

                                 TRUST AGREEMENT

I, Larry Sostad, agree to hold in trust the Copper Road I-VI Mineral Property,
Tenure Number 526652, located two kilometres east of Deep Water Bay on Quadra
Island, British Columbia.


                                     Signed: /s/ Larry Sostad
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Larry Sostad
EXHIBIT 23     INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Longs Drug Stores Corporation Registration
Statement Nos. 033-54959, 033-60005, 333-88786, 33398913, and 33398915
on Form S8 of our report dated February 26, 2003 (which
expresses an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating
to the adoption of a new accounting standard), appearing in the Annual Report
on Form 10K of Longs Drug Stores Corporation for the year ended
January 30, 2003.      San Francisco, California April 18, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                          91,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  186,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               277,286
<PP&E>                                       5,587,542
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,164,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,799,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          221,619
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       436,537
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,140,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,799,006
<SALES>                                        648,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               648,100
<CGS>                                          815,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  815,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (162,419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (162,419)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (162,419)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (162,419)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          28,000
<SECURITIES>                                   290,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               335,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,242,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,237,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,242,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                164,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            164,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   164,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>