alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: 

Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:37 AM

To: 

Subject: ADCOTE 76R36B/9L7 Diisocyanate Information (1-9QMS07) 

Attachments: ADCOTE(TM) 76R36B MSDS-US.PDF; COREACTANT 9L7 MSDS-US.PDF; 

ADCOTETM 76R36B, rev 2012, CPDS.pdf; COREACTANT 9L7, rev 2012, CPDS.PDF 

 

Subject: ADCOTETM 76R36B/COREACTANT 9L7 Adhesive System

 In response to your question of September 18 2012, copied and pasted here: 

 Thank you for sending the CPDS for Coreactant 9L7. My interest is not how much Hexamethylene 

Diisocyanate (H-D) is in Coreactant 9L7, but how much is emitted to the atmosphere. It is my 

understanding that the purpose of the H-D in the coreactant is to facilitate a reaction and that all of the 

H-D would not be expected to be emitted to the atmosphere. How much of the H-D will react or bond 

in the process and will not be emitted to the atmosphere? 

As stated in the MSDS and CPDS (attached), ADCOTETM 76R36B does not contain isocyanates, while 

COREACTANT 9L7 contains approximately 0.5% Hexamethylene Diisocyanate (HMDI), as supplied in the 

original unopened container. At the recommended mix ratio of 100 parts ADCOTE 76R36B to 4 parts 

COREACTANT 9L7, the theoretical HMDI concentration in the wet adhesive blend is estimated to be 

approximately 0.0192% by weight, or 192 ppm. 

 The diisocyanate is consumed (reacts with the polyester polymer) during the drying and curing process. 

The finished laminate structure is not expected to contain any residual diisocyanate. Our customers are 

expected to use our Adhesive Systems in an industrial setting according to the guidelines stated in the 

Material Safety Data Sheet, including proper ventilation and environmental controls. 

 Our information is based upon the theoretical compositions. We are disclosing this information, to the 

best of our knowledge, based upon data from our raw material suppliers and knowledge of our 

manufacturing processes. We believe our information to be accurate and reliable as of this date. 

 

Best Regards, 
Product Specialist – Performance Plastics 

Customer Information Group 

Dow Business Services LLC, Market & Sales Solutions 

2007 Austin, Midland, MI 48674 

This information is considered accurate and reliable as of the date appearing above and is presented in 

good faith. Because use conditions and applicable laws may differ from one location to another and 

may change with time, recipient is responsible for determining whether the information in this 

document is appropriate for recipient's use. Since Dow has no control over how this information may 

ultimately be used, all liability is expressly disclaimed and Dow assumes no obligation or liability 

therefore. No warranty, expressed or implied, is given nor is freedom from any patent owned by The 

Dow Chemical Company or others to be inferred.
### §396. Lead system integrator; financial interests

#### (a) In general

With respect to contracts entered into after July 1, 2007, and except as provided in subsection (b), no entity performing lead system integrator functions in the acquisition of a major system by the Department of Homeland Security may have any direct financial interest in the development or construction of any individual system or element of any system of systems.

#### (b) Exception

An entity described in subsection (a) may have a direct financial interest in the development or construction of an individual system or element of a system of systems if—

(1) the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives, the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, and the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate that—

(A) the entity was selected by the Department of Homeland Security as a contractor to develop or construct the system or element concerned through the use of competitive procedures; and

(B) the Department took appropriate steps to prevent any organizational conflict of interest in the selection process; or

(2) the entity was selected by a subcontractor to serve as a lower-tier subcontractor, through a process over which the entity exercised no control.

#### (c) Construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude an entity described in subsection (a) from performing work necessary to integrate two or more individual systems or elements of a system of systems with each other.

#### (d) Regulations update

Not later than July 1, 2007, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall update the acquisition regulations of the Department of Homeland Security in order to specify fully in such regulations the matters with respect to lead system integrators set forth in this section. Included in such regulations shall be: (1) a precise and comprehensive definition of the term "lead system integrator", modeled after that used by the Department of Defense; and (2) a specification of various types of contracts and fee structures that are appropriate for use by lead system integrators in the production, fielding, and sustainment of complex systems.

(Pub. L. 110–28, title VI, §6405, May 25, 2007, 121 Stat. 176.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007, and not as part of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 which comprises this chapter.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officers of Longs Drug Stores Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 25, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    WARREN F. BRYANT                          
|                     |  |  |  | Warren F. Bryant                                 
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer  
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    STEVEN F.
MCCANN                          
|                     |  |  |  | Steven F. McCann                                 
|                     |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Longs Drug Stores Corporation and will be retained by Longs Drug Stores Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul M. Anderson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PAUL M. ANDERSON                                                           
|Paul M. Anderson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer May 10, 2005
Opinion issued December 18, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 4
- 0 0159
- C V

——————————— JENNIFER BRADEN , Appellant

V. HUSSAIN RAHIM , Appellee
On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2012
- 45660

MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 24 , 2014, appellant was notified of intent to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution for failure to file a brief by November 4, 2014. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1)

. To date, no appellate brief has been received.2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to file a proper appellate brief and this Court’s notice, is o f the opinion this appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown

.
### [§3306. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–228, §1, Feb. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 25]

Section, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 419, related to apportionment of appointments in the departmental service in the District of Columbia among the States, territories, etc.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-59041, 333-59043, 333-47433, 333-03769, 333-97640, 333-09549, and 333-60942
of Serologicals Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated February 28, 2003
relating to the consolidated financial statements of Serologicals Corporation as
of and for the year ended December 29, 2002 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to (1) the
Company's change in its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible
assets to conform with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 and
(2) the application of procedures relating to certain adjustments and
disclosures of financial statement amounts related to the 2001 and 2000
financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased
operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance
other than with respect to such adjustments and disclosures) appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Serologicals Corporation for the year ended
December 29, 2002.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 25, 2003
### §425. Application of certain commercial items authorities to certain procurements

#### (a) Authority

#### (1) In general

The head of an executive agency may apply the provisions of law listed in paragraph (2) to a procurement referred to in section 422 of this title without regard to whether the property or services are commercial items.

#### (2) Commercial item laws

The provisions of law referred to in paragraph (1) are as follows:

(A) Sections 1901 and 1906 of title 41.

(B) Section 3205 of title 10.

(C) Section 3305 of title 41.

#### (b) Inapplicability of limitation on use of simplified acquisition procedures

#### (1) In general

The $5,000,000 limitation provided in section 1901(a)(2) of title 41, section 3205(a)(2) of title 10, and section 3305(a)(2) of title 41 shall not apply to purchases of property or services to which any of the provisions of law referred to in subsection (a) are applied under the authority of this section.

#### (2) OMB guidance

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall issue guidance and procedures for the use of simplified acquisition procedures for a purchase of property or services in excess of $5,000,000 under the authority of this section.

#### (c) Continuation of authority for simplified purchase procedures

Authority under a provision of law referred to in subsection (a)(2) that expires under section 4202(e) of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (divisions D and E of Public Law 104–106; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) shall, notwithstanding such section, continue to apply for use by the head of an executive agency as provided in subsections (a) and (b).

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §855, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2236; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1702(c)(3), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2155.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4202(e) of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996, referred to in subsec. (c), is section 4202(e) of Pub. L. 104–106, which is set out as a note under section 2304 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 117–81, §1702(c)(3)(A), added subpars. (A) to (C) and struck out former subpars. (A) to (C) which read as follows:

"(A) Sections 1901 and 1906 of title 41.

"(B) Section 2304(g) of title 10.

"(C) Section 3305 of title 41."

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 117–81, §1702(c)(3)(B), substituted "provided in section 1901(a)(2) of title 41, section 3205(a)(2) of title 10, and section 3305(a)(2) of title 41 shall not" for "provided in section 1901(a)(2) of title 41, section 2304(g)(1)(B) of title 10, and section 3305(a)(2) of title 41 shall not".
#### PEOPLE ex rel. KENEFICK, Appellant, v. FINN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Jeremiah Kenefick, against Daniel B. Finn. C. O. Maas, for appellant. W. B. Crowell, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### § 1645.5 Impartiality.

Boards may not give preferential treatment to one religion or sect over another and no preferential treatment will be given a duly ordained minister over a regular minister.
#### § 1602.21 Selective Service Law.

The term *Selective Service Law* includes the Military Selective Service Act, all rules and regulations issued thereunder, and Proclamations of the President pertaining to registration under that Act.
### §193. Technology clearinghouse to encourage and support innovative solutions to enhance homeland security

#### (a) Establishment of program

The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall establish and promote a program to encourage technological innovation in facilitating the mission of the Department (as described in section 111 of this title).

#### (b) Elements of program

The program described in subsection (a) shall include the following components:

(1) The establishment of a centralized Federal clearinghouse for information relating to technologies that would further the mission of the Department for dissemination, as appropriate, to Federal, State, and local government and private sector entities for additional review, purchase, or use.

(2) The issuance of announcements seeking unique and innovative technologies to advance the mission of the Department.

(3) The establishment of a technical assistance team to assist in screening, as appropriate, proposals submitted to the Secretary (except as provided in subsection (c)(2)) to assess the feasibility, scientific and technical merits, and estimated cost of such proposals, as appropriate.

(4) The provision of guidance, recommendations, and technical assistance, as appropriate, to assist Federal, State, and local government and private sector efforts to evaluate and implement the use of technologies described in paragraph (1) or (2).

(5) The provision of information for persons seeking guidance on how to pursue proposals to develop or deploy technologies that would enhance homeland security, including information relating to Federal funding, regulation, or acquisition.

#### (c) Miscellaneous provisions

#### (1) In general

Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the Secretary or the technical assistance team established under subsection (b)(3) to set standards for technology to be used by the Department, any other executive agency, any State or local government entity, or any private sector entity.

#### (2) Certain proposals

The technical assistance team established under subsection (b)(3) shall not consider or evaluate proposals submitted in response to a solicitation for offers for a pending procurement or for a specific agency requirement.

#### (3) Coordination

In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall coordinate with the Technical Support Working Group (organized under the April 1982 National Security Decision Directive Numbered 30).

(Pub. L. 107–296, title III, §313, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2176.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0024

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

FELIPE AGUSTIN TORRES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 8, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 21 2020

12/21/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0024
| Name of Subsidiary                                 |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Mankato Citizens Telephone Company                 |   | Minnesota                     |
| Mid-Communications, Inc.                           |   | Minnesota                     |
| Cable Network, Inc.                                |   | Minnesota                     |
| Heartland Telecommunications Company of Iowa, Inc. |   | Minnesota                     |
| Crystal Communications, Inc.                       |   | Minnesota                     |
| National Independent Billing, Inc.                 |   | Minnesota                     |
| Enventis Telecom, Inc.                             |   | Minnesota                     |
| CP Telecom, Inc.                                   |   | Minnesota                     |

----
### §1509. Exception to limitation on authority of Secretary of Defense to disseminate certain information

Notwithstanding subsection (c)(3) of section 393 of title 10, the Secretary of Defense may authorize the sharing of cyber threat indicators and defensive measures pursuant to the policies, procedures, and guidelines developed or issued under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 114–113, div. N, title I, §110, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2956.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. John H. Billman, Defendant.

Motion by defendant to dispense with printing and for assignment of counsel denied on the ground that the motion is premature. It appears that the defendant has not yet been sentenced and that no judgment of conviction has been entered. Until the entry of the judgment of conviction no appeal may be taken. Motion by plaintiff to dismiss appeal granted. Until the entry of the judgment of conviction no appeal lies. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 823.12 Soil removal and stockpiling. ( a ) Prime farmland soils shall be removed from the areas to be disturbed before drilling, blasting, or mining.
( b ) The minimum depth of soil and soil materials to be removed and stored for use in the reconstruction of prime farmland shall be sufficient to meet the requirements of § 823.14(b).
( c ) Soil removal and stockpiling operations on prime farmland shall be conducted to— ( 1 ) Separately remove the topsoil, or remove other suitable soil materials where such other soil materials will create a final soil having a greater productive capacity than that which exist prior to mining. If not utilized immediately, this material shall be placed in stockpiles separate from the spoil and all other excavated materials; and
( 2 ) Separately remove the B or C soil horizon or other suitable soil material to provide the thickness of suitable soil required by § 823.14(b), except as approved by the regulatory authority where the B or C soil horizons would not otherwise be removed and where soil capabilities can be retained. If not utilized immediately, each horizon or other material shall be stockpiled separately from the spoil and all other excavated materials. Where combinations of such soil materials created by mixing have been shown to be equally or more favorable for plant growth than the B horizon, separate handling is not necessary.
( d ) Stockpiles shall be placed within the permit area where they will not be disturbed or be subject to excessive erosion. If left in place for more than 30 days, stockpiles shall meet the requirements of § 816.22 or § 817.22 of this chapter.
[48 FR 21463, May 12, 1983, as amended at 53 FR 40839, Oct. 18, 1988]
#### § 147.21 Expanding investigations.

Investigations and reinvestigations may be expanded under the provisions of Executive Order 12968 (60 FR 40245, 3 CFR 1995 Comp., p. 391) and other applicable statutes and Executive Orders.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7909** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. CHRISTOPHER TOBY HAYES , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Cameron McGowan Currie , Senior District Judge. ( 3:02

- cr - 00548

- CMC

- 7 )

Submitted : March 17, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Christopher Toby Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, John C. Potterfield, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, Carrie Fisher Sherard, Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorneys, Gre enville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Toby Hayes appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) ( 2012 ) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines, as well as its order dismissing his motion for reconsideration
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order granting Hayes’ § 3582(c)(2) motion for the reasons stated by the district court
. See United States v. Hayes , No. 3:02

- cr - 00548

- CMC

- 7 (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2015 ). We also agree with the district
court ’s assessment that it lacked authority to entertain Hayes’ motion for reconsideration. See Un ited States v. Goodwyn , 596
F. 3d 233, 235

- 36 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we likewise af firm the district court’s order dismissing Hayes’ motion for reconsideration
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED