alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended March 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                  5,753
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             203
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        5,818
<PP&E>                                 37,596
<DEPRECIATION>                         10,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         34,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     416
<BONDS>                                13,527
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             18,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           34,107
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       31,793
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           4,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      2,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        25,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    25,087
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           25,087
<EPS-BASIC>                           12.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                           12.41


</TABLE>
# C_2023322EN.01000201.xml

| 12.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/2

---

Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA’s) mission

(2023/C 322/02)

Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 (1), Article 36(2), provides that the European Food Safety Authority's ‘Management Board, acting on a proposal from the Executive Director, shall draw up a list to be made public of competent organisations designated by the Member States which may assist the Authority, either individually or in networks, with its mission.’

1

The list was first drawn up by EFSA’s Management Board on 19 December 2006, and since then is:

| i. | updated regularly, on the basis of proposals from EFSA’s Executive Director, taking account of reviews or new designation proposals from the Member States (in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004, Article 2(4) (2)), and |
| --- | --- |

i.

updated regularly, on the basis of proposals from EFSA’s Executive Director, taking account of reviews or new designation proposals from the Member States (in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004, Article 2(4) (2)), and

2

| ii. | made public on EFSA’s website, where the latest updated list of competent organisations is published. |
| --- | --- |

ii.

made public on EFSA’s website, where the latest updated list of competent organisations is published.

This respective information is available on the EFSA website, at the following locations:

| i. | the latest amendment to the list of competent organisations by EFSA’s Management Board on 4 September 2023 – http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/partnersnetworks/scorg. |
| --- | --- |

i.

the latest amendment to the list of competent organisations by EFSA’s Management Board on 4 September 2023 – http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/partnersnetworks/scorg.

EFSA will keep this Notice updated, specifically regarding the provided website links.

For more information please contact Cooperation.Article36@efsa.europa.eu.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1).

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004 of 23 December 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 with regard to the network of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s mission (OJ L 379, 24.12.2004, p. 64), as last amended.

2

---
Exhibit 10.59(c)


Exhibit 10.57(c)
  

	 	 	 	 	 
	SECOND
      AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
	 	 	 	 	 
	This Second
      Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of June 1,
      2001, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (“Employer”)
      and Brud Drachman (“Executive”). 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Recitals
	 	 	 	 	 
	A)	 	On January
      11, 2000 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between
      Employer and Executive.
	 	 	 	 	 
	B)	 	On January
      24, 2001, a First Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and entered
      into by and between Employer and Executive; 
	 	 	 	 	 
	C)	 	Employer
      and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth
      hereinbelow:
	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreement
	 	 	 	 	 
	1.	 	Section
      2.1 of the Agreement which provides:
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 2.1	 Salary.
      For Executive’s services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary
      to Executive the amount of $105,000 during each year of the Employment Term.
      Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer’s
      normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if
      any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine. 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	is hereby
      amended, effective June 1, 2001, to provide as follows:
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	2.1	Salary.
      For Executive’s services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary
      to Executive the amount of $137,000 during each year of the Employment Term.
      Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer’s
      normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if
      any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
	 	 	 	 	 
	2.	 	All other
      terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain unaltered and fully effective.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Executed
      in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.
	 	 	 	 	 


	EXECUTIVE	EMPLOYER
	 	 
	 	PRICESMART,
      INC.
	 	 
	Brud
        Drachman 

       /s/ B. E. Drachman
	By: /s/
      Robert M. Gans

      

      Name: Robert M. Gans

      

      Its: Executive Vice President
### §60503. Reauthorization of Glory Mission

Congress reauthorizes the Administration to continue with development of the Glory Mission, which will examine how aerosols and solar energy affect the Earth's climate.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3425.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60503 | 42 U.S.C. 17713(a). | Pub. L. 110–422, title II, §206(a), Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4785. |

Section
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble,
Chairman/Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David J. NobleDavid J. NobleChairman/Director
Chief Executive Officer


Date:    8/15/2011
No. 8336.

#### The Pennsylvania Co. *v.*The State ex rel. Gallinger.

(Decided October 6, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Crawford county.

*Messrs. Wheeler & Bentley,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Finley & Gallinger,*for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed; demurrer to answer overruled; demurrer to petition sustained, and petition dismissed on authority of the *P., C., C. & St. L. Ry.*Co. *537v. *Cox,*55 Ohio St., 497, and the *State ex rel.*v. *The P., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.,*68 Ohio St., 9.

Burket, O. J., Spear, Davis, Shauck, Price and. Grew, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

KEVIN KIMBLE,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 113 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
#### § 1802.13 Identification of material at issue.

Authorized holders shall append the documents at issue and clearly mark those portions subject to the challenge. If information not in documentary form is in issue, the challenge shall state so clearly and present or otherwise refer with specificity to that information in the body of the challenge.
§ 22.605 Grants officers' responsibilities. At the time of award, the grants officer is responsible for ensuring that: ( a ) The award: ( 1 ) Conforms to the award format specified in 2 CFR part 1120.
( 2 ) Includes appropriate general terms and conditions and any program-specific and award-specific terms and conditions needed to specify applicable administrative, national policy, and programmatic requirements. These requirements include: ( i ) Federal statutes or Executive orders that apply broadly to Federal or DoD grants and cooperative agreements; and
( ii ) Any requirements specific to the program, as prescribed in the program statute (see § 22.210(a)(2)), or specific to the funding, as stated in pertinent Congressional appropriations (see § 22.515).
( b ) Information about the award is reported to the Defense Assistance Award Data System (DAADS), in accordance with Subpart E of 32 CFR part 21.
( c ) ( 1 ) In addition to the copy of the award document provided to the recipient, a copy is forwarded to the office designated to administer the grant or cooperative agreement, and another copy is forwarded to the finance and accounting office designated to make the payments to the recipient.
( 2 ) For any award subject to the electronic funds transfer (EFT) requirement described in § 22.810(b)(2), the grants officer shall include a prominent notification of that fact on the first page of the copies forwarded to the recipient, the administrative grants officer, and the finance and accounting office. On the first page of the copy forwarded to the recipient, the grants officer also shall include a prominent notification that the recipient, to be paid, must submit a Payment Information Form (Standard Form SF-3881[6] ) to the responsible DoD payment office, if that payment office does not currently have the information (e.g., bank name and account number) needed to pay the recipient by EFT.
[63 FR 12164, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 47160, Aug. 7, 2003; 70 FR 49465, Aug. 23, 2005; 85 FR 51243, Aug. 19, 2020] Footnotes -
22.605
[6] See footnote 5 to § 22.510(b).
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 EAGLEPICHER HOLDINGS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of EaglePicher Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
H. Weber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1984; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ JOHN H. WEBER
    
    Date: October 12, 2004John H. Weber, President and Chief Executive Officer
# InventoryExpertService A division oftheAmerican Chemical Society Phone: 800-631-1884, 614-447-3870 Fax:614-447-3747 E-mail: answers@cas.org Web:www.cas.org/products/clientl INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

Please print the above CA lnde& Name on the appropriate page of your PMN, 

# D

CAS lf this bo& 

### is

**~hacked,** CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order, Please make the same cor:reotion(s) to your P!•ll>l before submitting it to the EPA, 

### ATTACHMENT THREE: PMN Substance Two (CONFIDENTIAL) 2540 Olentangy River Road P.O.ll<>x 334J Co(umbus, Ohio 43210·0334 USA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND ON PAGES
F-3 - F-5 OF THE COMPANY'S 10-K, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768162
<NAME> LANCER CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (85)
<INVENTORY>                                     20,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,552
<PP&E>                                          36,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,242)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,279
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            39
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,944
<SALES>                                         75,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,402
<CGS>                                           59,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,612
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,091
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,091
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02
        

</TABLE>
### §8413. Deferred retirement

(a) An employee or Member who is separated from the service, or transferred to a position in which the employee or Member does not continue subject to this chapter, after completing 5 years of service is entitled to an annuity beginning at the age of 62 years.

(b)(1) An employee or Member who is separated from the service, or transferred to a position in which the employee or Member does not continue subject to this chapter, after completing 10 years of service but before attaining the applicable minimum retirement age under section 8412(h) is entitled to an annuity beginning on the date designated by the employee or Member in a written election under this subsection. The date designated under this subsection may not precede the date on which the employee or Member attains such minimum retirement age and must precede the date on which the employee or Member becomes 62 years of age.

(2) The election of an annuity under this subsection shall not be effective unless—

(A) it is made at such time and in such manner as the Office shall by regulation prescribe; and

(B) the employee or Member will not otherwise be eligible to receive an annuity within 31 days after filing the election.

(3) The election of an annuity under this subsection extinguishes the right of the employee or Member to receive any other annuity based on the service on which the annuity under this subsection is based.

(Added Pub. L. 99–335, title I, §101(a), June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 525; amended Pub. L. 99–556, title I, §105(b)(1), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3132.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 99–556 inserted "but before attaining the applicable minimum retirement age under section 8412(h)" in first sentence and substituted "such minimum retirement age" for "the applicable minimum retirement age under section 8412(h)" in second sentence.
**Order of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2009 – Poland v Commission**

**(Case T-258/04)**

Action for annulment – Transitional measures to be adopted by reason of the accession of new Member States – Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector – Time-limit for bringing an action – Point from which time starts to run – Lateness – Inadmissibility

Procedure – Time-limit for instituting proceedings – Claim barred by lapse of time – Action against a regulation adopted pursuant to the 2003 Act of Accession by a State signatory to that Act not yet having
the capacity of Member State – No effect – Time-limit applicable in its capacity as a legal person (Art. 230, fourth and fifth paras, EC; Act of Accession of 2003)
(see paras 40-71)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for annulment of Articles 5, 6(1) to (3), 7(1) and 8(2)(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 of 14 January 2004 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union (OJ 2004 L 9, p. 8). |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | The Republic of Poland is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | The Republic of Cyprus is ordered to bear its own costs. |
# C_2010328EN.01005902.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/59

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — Torijano Montero v Council

(Case F-76/05) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Appointment - Candidates placed on a reserve list of a competition published prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Classification in grade under the new, less favourable rules - Article 5 of the Staff Regulations - Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Principle of equality - Principle of protection of legitimate expectations - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Proportionality)

2010/C 328/94

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Javier Torijano Montero (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially, S. Rodrigues and A. Jaume, lawyers, and subsequently, S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Arpio Santacruz and I. Sulce, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the Council’s decision classifying the applicant, who was placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations, under the less favourable provisions of those regulations (Article 12 of Annex XIII to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 12.11.2005, p. 23. (Case originally registered at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities as Case T-302/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005.)

1

---
#### Thelma Amie, Appellant, v. Helen Laure, Individually and Doing Business as James Laure Building Supplies, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The complaint sets forth a cause of action based on breach of warranty. (See *Randy Knitwear*v. *American Cyanamid Co,,*11 N Y 2d 5; *Thomas*v. *Leary,*
      *73715 A D 2d 438.) (Appeal by plaintiff from certain parts of an order of Onondaga Special Term granting the motion of defendant Laure to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 27, 2017

t0920 

# Order

Clerk September 27, 2017

155630

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155630

COA: 330217

Oakland CC: 2015

- 255155

- FH

SCOTT LARRY CHANDLER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# 05-16092 Judge v. Adams

B.Fletcher, Cliton, Ikuta, CJJ

2007

29.779804
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
STM Wireless, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-50806, 33-995570, 33-99572 and 333-94227) on Form S-8 and registration
statements (Nos. 33-70650, 33-73962, 33-99568, 333-50485, 333-85707 and
333-92723) on Form S-3 of STM Wireless, Inc. of our report dated March 2, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of STM Wireless, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, and the related
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form
10-K of STM Wireless, Inc.

                                                 KPMG LLP


Orange County, California

March 29, 2000


                                       65