Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2020 / Notices 86905 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice. 

1See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China: Final Determination 

of Anti-Circumvention Inquiry, 85 FR 9737, 9738 

(February 20, 2020) (Final Determination); see also 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China and the Republic of 

Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 57145 

(November 4, 2009). 

2See Final Determination, 85 FR at 9739. 

3 Id. 

hereby adopted by this notice.6 The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. A list of 

topics discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is included as 

an appendix to this notice. In addition, 

a complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

The signed and the electronic versions 

of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Review 

Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3) 

of the Act, Commerce finds that 

revocation of the Order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies, at the 

following rates: 

Producer/exporter Net subsidy rate 

Fasten Group Corporation (Fasten Corp.), Fasten Group Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Fasten I&E), Jiangyin 

Hongsheng Co. Ltd. (Hongsheng), Jiangyin Fasten Steel Products Co., Ltd. (Fasten Steel), Jiangyin Hongyu 

Metal Products Co., Ltd. (Hongyu Metal), and Jiangyin Walsin Steel Cable Co., Ltd. (Walsin) (Collectively, the 

Fasten Companies).

9.42 percent ad valorem. 

Xinhua Metal Products Company Ltd. (Xinhua), Xinyu Iron and Steel Joint Stock Limited Company (Xinyu), and 

Xingang Iron and Steel Joint Stock Limited Liability Company (Xingang) (Collectively the Xinhua Companies).

45.85 percent ad valorem. 

All Others ....................................................................................................................................................................... 27.64 percent ad valorem. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing the 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218. 

Dated: December 28, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. History of the Order 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Likely to 

Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidy 

VII. Final Results of Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2020–28984 Filed 12–30–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–900] 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 20, 2020, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published the initiation and preliminary 

results of a changed circumstances 

review (CCR) of the antidumping duty 

order on diamond sawblades and parts 

thereof (diamond sawblades) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China). For 

these final results, Commerce continues 

to find that Protech Diamond Tools Inc. 

(Protech) and Gogo International Inc. 

(Gogo) are affiliated. Additionally, 

Commerce continues to find that 

Protech is eligible to participate in a 

certification process because Protech 

has demonstrated that it can identify 

diamond sawblades that it produced in 

Canada using non-Chinese cores and 

Chinese segments. 

DATES: Applicable December 31, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael A. Romani, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office I, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–9180. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 20, 2020, Commerce 

found ‘‘that diamond sawblades made 

with Chinese cores and Chinese 

segments joined in Canada by Protech 

and then subsequently exported from 

Canada to the United States are 

circumventing the antidumping duty 

order on diamond sawblades from 

China.’’ 1 In the Final Determination, 

Commerce found that diamond 

sawblades ‘‘assembled or completed in 

Canada using non-Chinese origin cores 

and/or non-Chinese origin segments are 

not subject to this anti-circumvention 

inquiry.’’ However, because Protech was 

unable ‘‘to identify diamond sawblades 

produced with non-Chinese origin cores 

and/or non-Chinese origin segments,’’ 

Commerce decided not to ‘‘implement a 

certification process for diamond 

sawblades already suspended,’’ and 

required ‘‘cash deposits on all entries of 

diamond sawblades produced and 

exported by Protech in Canada.’’ 2 We 

indicated that Protech could, at some 

future point request reconsideration of 

Commerce’s denial of the certification 

process in, e.g., a CCR.3

On August 19, 2020, Protech 

submitted a request for a CCR, in which 

Protech claimed that it is able to 

identify and segregate diamond 

sawblades made with non-Chinese cores 

and Chinese segments joined in Canada 

by Protech and then subsequently 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
86906 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2020 / Notices 

4See Protech’s Letters, ‘‘Request for Changed 

Circumstances Review,’’ dated August 19, 2020 

(CCR Request) at 1–2; see also ‘‘Response of Protech 

Diamond Tools Inc. to the Department’s September 

1, 2020, Supplemental Questionnaire’’ dated 

September 15, 2020 (Protech’s First Supplemental 

Response) at 1. 

5See DSMC’s Letter, ‘‘Comments in Support of 

Protech’s Request for Changed Circumstances 

Review,’’ dated August 26, 2020. DSMC is the 

petitioner in this proceeding. 

6See Protech’s First Supplemental Response. 

7See Protech’s Letter, ‘‘Response of Protech 

Diamond Tools Inc. to the Department’s September 

28, 2020, Second Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ 

dated October 1, 2020. 

8See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China: Initiation and 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 85 FR 74315 (November 20, 

2020) (Initiation and Preliminary Results). 

9See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from 

the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 

76128 (December 6, 2011). 

10See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 

2017, 83 FR 64331 (December 14, 2018), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

3. 

11See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and 

Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Affiliation of Protech Diamond Tools Inc. and Gogo 

International Inc.’’ dated November 17, 2020, for 

details containing Protech’s business proprietary 

information. 

12The circumvention determination covered 

diamond sawblades produced in Canada by Protech 

with Chinese cores and Chinese segments and 

exported by Protech. See Final Determination, 85 

FR at 9738. Other exporters are not covered by the 

circumvention determination. 

exported from Canada by Protech, its 

affiliate Gogo, or a third party, to the 

United States.4 Protech requested that 

Commerce find it eligible for 

certification of these diamond 

sawblades as non-subject merchandise. 

On August 26, 2020, the Diamond 

Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition 

(DSMC) submitted a letter supporting 

the CCR Request.5 In response to our 

request for additional information, 

Protech submitted its supplemental 

responses on September 15, 2020,6 and 

October 1, 2020.7

Commerce preliminarily determined 

that Protech is able to track and certify 

the country of origin of the diamond 

sawblade cores used in the production 

of diamond sawblades produced at its 

facility in Canada. Commerce further 

determined that diamond sawblades 

produced in Canada by Protech, using 

Chinese cores and Chinese segments, 

and exported by Protech or its affiliate, 

Gogo, to the United States are subject to 

the antidumping duty order on diamond 

sawblades from China.8

No party commented on the Initiation 

and Preliminary Results regarding 

Commerce’s analysis of Protech’s 

practices to track the country of origin 

of the cores it uses to produce diamond 

sawblades which are exported to the 

United States, the determination that 

Protech and Gogo are affiliated, the 

sufficiency of the certification process, 

or the certification language. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

all finished circular sawblades, whether 

slotted or not, with a working part that 

is comprised of a diamond segment or 

segments, and parts thereof, regardless 

of specification or size, except as 

specifically excluded below. Within the 

scope of the order are semi-finished 

diamond sawblades, including diamond 

sawblade cores and diamond sawblade 

segments. Diamond sawblade cores are 

circular steel plates, whether or not 

attached to non-steel plates, with slots. 

Diamond sawblade cores are 

manufactured principally, but not 

exclusively, from alloy steel. A diamond 

sawblade segment consists of a mixture 

of diamonds (whether natural or 

synthetic, and regardless of the quantity 

of diamonds) and metal powders 

(including, but not limited to, iron, 

cobalt, nickel, tungsten carbide) that are 

formed together into a solid shape (from 

generally, but not limited to, a heating 

and pressing process). 

Sawblades with diamonds directly 

attached to the core with a resin or 

electroplated bond, which thereby do 

not contain a diamond segment, are not 

included within the scope of the order. 

Diamond sawblades and/or sawblade 

cores with a thickness of less than 0.025 

inches, or with a thickness greater than 

1.1 inches, are excluded from the scope 

of the order. Circular steel plates that 

have a cutting edge of non-diamond 

material, such as external teeth that 

protrude from the outer diameter of the 

plate, whether or not finished, are 

excluded from the scope of the order. 

Diamond sawblade cores with a 

Rockwell C hardness of less than 25 are 

excluded from the scope of the order. 

Diamond sawblades and/or diamond 

segment(s) with diamonds that 

predominantly have a mesh size number 

greater than 240 (such as 250 or 260) are 

excluded from the scope of the order. 

Merchandise subject to the order is 

typically imported under heading 

8202.39.00.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

When packaged together as a set for 

retail sale with an item that is separately 

classified under headings 8202 to 8205 

of the HTSUS, diamond sawblades or 

parts thereof may be imported under 

heading 8206.00.00.00 of the HTSUS. 

On October 11, 2011, Commerce 

included the 6804.21.00.00 HTSUS 

classification number to the customs 

case reference file, pursuant to a request 

by U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP).9 Pursuant to requests by CBP, 

Commerce included to the customs case 

reference file the following HTSUS 

classification numbers: 8202.39.0040 

and 8202.39.0070 on January 22, 2015, 

and 6804.21.0010 and 6804.21.0080 on 

January 26, 2015.10

The tariff classification is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes; 

however, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

Commerce is conducting this CCR in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216. 

For the reasons stated in the Initiation 

and Preliminary Results, and because 

we received no comments from 

interested parties, Commerce continues 

to find that, since the publication of the 

Final Determination, Protech has 

demonstrated in its CCR request and 

supplemental responses that it is able to 

identify and segregate diamond 

sawblades produced in Canada by 

Protech, using non-Chinese cores and 

Chinese segments and exported to the 

United States. Based on information 

provided by Protech, we also continue 

to find that Protech and Gogo are 

affiliated, in accordance with section 

771(33)(F) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(3).11 Therefore, we continue 

to find that diamond sawblades 

produced in Canada by Protech using 

Chinese cores and Chinese segments 

and exported by Gogo to the United 

States are subject to the antidumping 

duty order on diamond sawblades from 

China. 

Accordingly, effective on the 

publication date of these final results, 

Protech, Gogo and their importers will 

be eligible, where appropriate, to certify 

that the diamond sawblades produced 

in Canada by Protech and exported by 

either Protech or Gogo were produced 

using non-Chinese cores and Chinese 

segments. Attached as an appendix to 

this notice is the final certification 

language. Commerce also determines, 

based on the request in this CCR, that 

no other exporters are eligible for this 

certification process.12

Suspension of Liquidation and 

Certification Requirements 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.225(l)(3), the suspension of 

liquidation instructions will remain in 

effect until further notice. Commerce 

will direct CBP to suspend liquidation 

and to require a cash deposit of 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2020 / Notices 86907 

13See Final Determination, 85 FR at 9739. 14See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 64331, 64332 (December 

14, 2018). 

estimated duties on unliquidated entries 

of diamond sawblades produced (i.e., 

assembled or completed) using Chinese 

cores and Chinese segments by Protech 

in Canada and exported by Gogo that 

were entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

November 20, 2020, the date of 

initiation of the CCR.13

Diamond sawblades produced by 

Protech in Canada using non-Chinese 

cores and Chinese segments and 

exported from Canada by either Protech 

or Gogo are not subject to the 

antidumping duty order on diamond 

sawblades from China. However, 

imports of such merchandise are subject 

to certification requirements, and cash 

deposits may be required if the 

certification requirements are not 

satisfied. Accordingly, if an importer 

imports finished diamond sawblades 

produced in Canada by Protech and 

exported from Canada by either Protech 

or Gogo and claims that the finished 

diamond sawblades were produced 

from non-Chinese cores and Chinese 

segments, in order not to be subject to 

cash deposit requirements, the importer 

and exporter are required to meet the 

certification and documentation 

requirements described herein and in 

the certifications contained in the 

appendix to this notice. Where no 

certification is provided for an entry of 

diamond sawblades produced by 

Protech in Canada and exported by 

Protech or Gogo to the United States, 

and the antidumping duty order on 

diamond sawblades from China 

potentially applies to that entry, 

Commerce intends to instruct CBP to 

suspend the entry and collect cash 

deposits at the China-wide rate of 82.05 

percent of the entered value of the 

merchandise.14 For shipments and/or 

entry summaries made on or after the 

date of publication of the initiation of 

the CCR through 30 days after the date 

of publication of the final results of CCR 

for which certifications are required, 

importers and exporters should 

complete the required certification 

within 30 days after the publication of 

the final results of this CCR in the 

Federal Register. Accordingly, where 

appropriate, the relevant bullet in the 

certification should be edited to reflect 

that the certification was completed 

within the time frame specified above. 

For such entries/shipments, importers 

and exporters each have the option to 

complete a blanket certification 

covering multiple entries/shipments, 

individual certifications for each entry/ 

shipment, or a combination thereof. For 

shipments and/or entries made on or 

after 31 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

CCR in the Federal Register, for which 

certifications are required, importers 

should complete the required 

certification at or prior to the date of 

entry summary, and exporters should 

complete the required certification and 

provide it to the importer at or prior to 

the date of shipment. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.222. 

Dated: December 28, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

Exporter Certification 

Special Instructions: The party that made 

the sale to the United States should fill out 

the exporter certification. Only Protech 

Diamond Tools Inc., and Gogo International 

Inc., are eligible for this certification process. 

I hereby certify that: 

(A) My name is {COMPANY OFFICIAL’S 

NAME} and I am an official of {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY}, located at 

{ADDRESS}; 

(B) I have direct personal knowledge of the 

facts regarding the production and 

exportation of the finished diamond 

sawblades identified below. ‘‘Direct personal 

knowledge’’ refers to facts the certifying party 

is expected to have in its own books and 

records. For example, an exporter should 

have direct personal knowledge of the 

producer’s identity and location. 

(C) Finished diamond sawblades produced 

in Canada and covered by this certification 

were not manufactured using cores produced 

in China. 

(D) This certification applies to the 

following sales to {NAME OF U.S. 

CUSTOMER}, located at {ADDRESS OF U.S. 

CUSTOMER}. (repeat this block as many 

times as necessary): 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice # to U.S. Customer: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice to U.S. Customer 

Line item #: 

Producer Name: Protech Diamond Tools 

Inc. 

Producer’s Address: Unit 105, 1626 –115 

Avenue NE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T3K 

2E4 

Producer’s Invoice # to Foreign Seller: (If 

the foreign seller and the producer are the 

same party, put NA here.) 

(E) The finished diamond sawblades 

covered by this certification were shipped to 

{NAME OF U.S. PARTY TO WHOM 

MERCHANDISE WAS SHIPPED}, located at 

{U.S. ADDRESS TO WHICH MERCHANDISE 

WAS SHIPPED}. 

(F) I understand that {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of this certification and 

sufficient documentation supporting this 

certification (i.e., documents maintained in 

the normal course of business, or documents 

obtained by the certifying party, for example, 

mill certificates, production records, 

invoices, etc.) for the later of (1) a period of 

five years from the date of entry or (2) a 

period of three years after the conclusion of 

any litigation in the United States courts 

regarding such entries. 

(G) I understand that {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY} must provide a 

copy of this Exporter Certification to the U.S. 

importer by the date of shipment. 

(H) I understand that {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

provide a copy of this certification and 

supporting records, upon request, to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and/or 

the Department of Commerce (Commerce). 

(I) I understand that the claims made 

herein, and the substantiating documentation 

are subject to verification by CBP and/or 

Commerce. 

(J) I understand that failure to maintain the 

required certification and/or failure to 

substantiate the claims made herein, and/or 

failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to 

verify the claims made herein, may result in 

a de facto determination that all sales to 

which this certification applies are within 

the scope of the antidumping duty order on 

diamond sawblades and parts thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China. I understand 

that such finding will result in: 

(i) suspension of all unliquidated entries 

(and entries for which liquidation has not 

become final) for which these requirements 

were not met; and 

(ii) the requirement that the importer post 

applicable antidumping duty cash deposits 

(as appropriate) equal to the rates as 

determined by Commerce; and 

(iii) the revocation of {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY}’s privilege to 

certify future exports of finished diamond 

sawblades from Canada as not manufactured 

using cores from China. 

(K) This certification was completed at or 

prior to the date of shipment; 

(L) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but 

not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes 

criminal sanctions on individuals who 

knowingly and willfully make material false 

statements to the U.S. government. 

Signature 

NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL 

TITLE 

DATE 

Importer Certification 

I hereby certify that: 

(A) My name is {IMPORTING COMPANY 

OFFICIAL’S NAME} and I am an official of 

{NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY}, 

located at {ADRESS OF IMPORTING 

COMPANY}. 

(B) I have direct personal knowledge of the 

facts regarding the importation into the 

Customs territory of the United States of 

finished diamond sawblades produced in 

Canada that entered under entry summary 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
86908 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2020 / Notices 

1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the 

People’s Republic of China, 75 FR 37382 (June 29, 

2010) (Order). 

2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85 

FR 54348 (September 1, 2020). 

3 See Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘Prestressed 

Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the People’s 

Republic of China—Domestic Industry’s Notice of 

Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 14, 2020. 

4 See Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘Prestressed 

Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the People’s 

Republic of China—Domestic Industry’s 

Substantive Response,’’ dated September 30, 2020. 

number(s) identified below and are covered 

by this certification. ‘‘Direct personal 

knowledge’’ refers to facts the certifying party 

is expected to have in its own records. For 

example, the importer should have direct 

personal knowledge of the importation of the 

product (e.g., the name of the exporter) in its 

records. 

(C) If the importer is acting on behalf of the 

first U.S. customer, complete this paragraph, 

if not put ‘‘NA’’ at the end of this paragraph: 

finished diamond sawblades covered by this 

certification were imported by {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} on behalf of 

{NAME OF U.S. CUSTOMER}, located at 

{ADDRESS OF U.S. CUSTOMER}. 

(D) Finished diamond sawblades covered 

by this certification were shipped to {NAME 

OF PARTY TO WHOM MERCHANDISE 

WAS FIRST SHIPPED IN THE UNITED 

STATES}, located at {ADDRESS OF 

SHIPMENT}. 

(E) I have personal knowledge of the facts 

regarding the production of the finished 

diamond sawblades identified below. 

‘‘Personal knowledge’’ includes facts 

obtained from another party, (e.g., 

correspondence received by the importer (or 

exporter) from the producer regarding the 

country of manufacture of the imported 

products). 

(F) Finished diamond sawblades covered 

by this certification were not manufactured 

using cores produced in China. 

(G) This certification applies to the 

following entries (repeat this block as many 

times as necessary): 

Entry Summary #: 

Entry Summary Line Item #: 

Foreign Seller: 

Foreign Seller’s Address: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice #: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice Line Item #: 

Producer: Protech Diamond Tools Inc. 

Producer’s Address: Unit 105, 1626 –115 

Avenue NE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T3K 

2E4 

(H) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of this certification and 

sufficient documentation supporting this 

certification (i.e., documents maintained in 

the normal course of business, or documents 

obtained by the certifying party, for example, 

mill certificates, production records, 

invoices, etc.) for the later of (1) a period of 

five years from the date of entry, or (2) a 

period of three years after the conclusion of 

any litigation in the United States courts 

regarding such entries. 

(I) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

provide this certification and supporting 

records to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) and/or the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce), upon request by the 

respective agency. 

(J) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of the exporter’s certification 

(attesting to the production and/or export of 

the imported merchandise identified above), 

and any supporting records provided by the 

exporter to the importer, for the later of (1) 

a period of five years from the date of entry 

or (2) a period of three years after the 

conclusion of any litigation in United States 

courts regarding such entries. 

(K) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required, upon 

request, to provide a copy of the exporter’s 

certification and any supporting records 

provided by the exporter to the importer, to 

CBP and/or Commerce. 

(L) I understand that the claims made 

herein, and the substantiating 

documentation, are subject to verification by 

CBP and/or Commerce. 

(M) I understand that failure to maintain 

the required certifications, and/or failure to 

substantiate the claims made herein, and/or 

failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to 

verify the claims made herein, may result in 

a de facto determination that all entries to 

which this certification applies are within 

the scope of the antidumping duty order on 

diamond sawblades and parts thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China. I understand 

that such finding will result in: 

(i) suspension of liquidation of all 

unliquidated entries (and entries for which 

liquidation has not become final) for which 

these requirements were not met; 

(ii) the requirement that the importer post 

applicable antidumping duty cash deposits 

(as appropriate) equal to the rates determined 

by Commerce; and 

(iii) the revocation of {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY}’s privilege to 

certify future imports of diamond sawblades 

from Canada as not manufactured using cores 

from China. 

(N) I understand that agents of the 

importer, such as brokers, are not permitted 

to make this certification. Where a broker or 

other party was used to facilitate the entry 

process, {NAME OF IMPORTING 

COMPANY} obtained the entry summary 

number and date of entry summary from that 

party. 

(O) This certification was completed at or 

prior to the date of entry summary. 

(P) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but 

not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes 

criminal sanctions on individuals who 

knowingly and willfully make material false 

statements to the U.S. government. 

Signature 

NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL 

TITLE 

DATE 

[FR Doc. 2020–28980 Filed 12–30–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–945] 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire 

Strand From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of the Expedited 

Second Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on prestressed 

concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Sunset Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

DATES: Applicable December 31, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0176. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 29, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) published the 

antidumping duty order on PC strand 

from China.1 On September 1, 2020, 

Commerce initiated the second sunset 

review of the Order pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act).2 On September 14, 

2020, Commerce received a notice of 

intent to participate in this sunset 

review from Insteel Wire Products 

Company, Sumiden Wire Products 

Corporation, and Wire Mesh 

Corporation (collectively, ‘‘Domestic 

Industry’’), within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3

The members of the Domestic Industry 

claimed interested party status under 

section 771(9)(C) of the Act as producers 

of the domestic like product in the 

United States. On September 30, 2020, 

Commerce received a substantive 

response from the Domestic Industry 

within the 30-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 Commerce 

received no substantive responses from 

respondent interested parties, nor was a 

hearing requested. On October 27, 2020, 

Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that it did not receive an adequate 

substantive response from respondent 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES