alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 85683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28634]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-338-SLR and 50-339-SLR; ASLBP No. 21-970-01-SLR-01]


Virginia Electric and Power Company; Establishment of Atomic 
Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission, see 37 FR 28,710 (Dec. 
29, 1972), and the Commission's regulations, see, e.g., 10 CFR 2.104, 
2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given that 
an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to 
preside over the following proceeding:

Virginia Electric and Power Company (North Anna Power Station, Units 1 
and 2)

    This proceeding involves an application seeking a twenty-year 
subsequent license renewal of Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. 
NPF-4 and NPF-7, which currently authorize Virginia Electric and Power 
Company to operate the North Anna Power Company, Units 1 and 2, located 
in Louisa, Virginia, until, respectively, April 1, 2038 and August 21, 
2040. In response to a notice published in the Federal Register 
announcing the opportunity to request a hearing, see 85 FR 65,438 (Oct. 
15, 2020), a hearing request was filed on December 14, 2020 on behalf 
of Beyond Nuclear, Sierra Club, and Alliance for Progressive Virginia.
    The Board is comprised of the following Administrative Judges:
G. Paul Bollwerk, III, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

Nicholas G. Trikouros, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302.

    Rockville, Maryland. December 21, 2020.
Edward R. Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2020-28634 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
§ 1701.6 Disclosure of records/policy. Consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a(b), ODNI will not disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means (written, oral or electronic) without the consent of the subject individual unless disclosure without consent is made for reasons permitted under applicable law, including: ( a ) Internal agency use on a need-to-know basis;
( b ) Release under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) if not subject to protection under the FOIA exemptions;
( c ) A specific “routine use” as described in the ODNI's published compilation of Routine Uses Applicable to More Than One ODNI System of Records or in specific published Privacy Act Systems of Records Notices (available at *http://www.dni.gov*);
( d ) Release to the Bureau of the Census, the National Archives and Records Administration, or the Government Accountability Office, for the performance of those entities' statutory duties;
( e ) Release in non-identifiable form to a recipient who has provided written assurance that the record will be used solely for statistical research or reporting;
( f ) Compelling circumstances in which the health or safety of an individual is at risk;
( g ) Release pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction or to a governmental entity for a specifically documented civil or criminal law enforcement activity;
( h ) Release to either House of Congress or to any committee, subcommittee or joint committee thereof to the extent of matter within its jurisdiction;
( i ) Release to a consumer reporting agency in accordance with section 3711(e) of Title 31.
§ 240.4 Policy. It is DoD policy that: ( a ) The Department of Defense shall recruit, develop, and retain a highly skilled cadre of professionals to support the critical IA and information technology (IT) management, technical, digital and multimedia forensics, cyber, and infrastructure protection functions required for a secure network-centric environment.
( b ) The DoD IASP shall be used to attract new entrants to the DoD IA and IT workforce and to retain current IA and IT personnel necessary to support the DoD's diverse warfighting, business, intelligence, and enterprise information infrastructure requirements.
( c ) The academic disciplines, with concentrations in IA eligible for IASP support include, but are not limited to: biometrics, business management or administration, computer crime investigations, computer engineering, computer programming, computer science, computer systems analysis, cyber operations, cybersecurity, database administration, data management, digital and multimedia forensics, electrical engineering, electronics engineering, information security (assurance), information systems, mathematics, network management/operations, software engineering, and other similar disciplines as approved by DoD Chief Information Officer (DoD CIO).
( d ) Subject to availability of funds, the DoD may provide grants to institutions of higher education for faculty, curriculum, and infrastructure development and academic research to support the DoD IA/IT critical areas of interest.
#### In the Matter of Ronald Appel, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

February 27, 1979

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Nicholas C. Cooper*for petitioner.

*Appel & Goldman*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on June 22, 1960. This court *454heretofore censured respondent for neglect of an estate matter, observing as follows: "Although retained in 1964 in connection with an estate matter, respondent failed and neglected to wind up said estate and even subsequent to June 9, 1975, when first notified of charges, failed to conclude said estate, although given further opportunity to do so.” It is clear that respondent is guilty of neglect, which neglect has been exacerbated by his continued failure to attend to this estate matter for two years after his censure by this court. In answer, respondent candidly admits that the evidence sustains the charge of misconduct. Accordingly, the report of petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, dated September 22, 1978, should be confirmed.

As to the appropriate sanction, we note the following mitigating circumstances. Respondent’s record is otherwise unblemished, and his failure to complete work in the estate matter did not result from self-seeking or hope of financial or other personal gain.

Respondent’s dereliction is a serious one, ordinarily resulting in a sanction more severe than we impose. However, in the special circumstance we find here in connection with his current employment by an eleemosynary institution, the consequences of a heavier penalty may well be far more onerous than we would contemplate. We believe that the conduct is not likely to recur, and, accordingly, we consider severe censure to be condign to the dereliction. Respondent should be severely censured.

Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Evans, Lane and Markewich, JJ., concur.

Respondent severely censured.
### §9503. Streamlined critical pay authority

(a) Notwithstanding section 9502, and without regard to the provisions of this title governing appointments in the competitive service or the Senior Executive Service and chapters 51 and 53 (relating to classification and pay rates), the Secretary of the Treasury may, Before 1 September 30, 2013, establish, fix the compensation of, and appoint individuals to, designated critical administrative, technical, and professional positions needed to carry out the functions of the Internal Revenue Service, if—

(1) the positions—

(A) require expertise of an extremely high level in an administrative, technical, or professional field; and

(B) are critical to the Internal Revenue Service's successful accomplishment of an important mission;

(2) exercise of the authority is necessary to recruit or retain an individual exceptionally well qualified for the position;

(3) the number of such positions does not exceed 40 at any one time;

(4) designation of such positions are approved by the Secretary of the Treasury;

(5) the terms of such appointments are limited to no more than 4 years;

(6) appointees to such positions were not Internal Revenue Service employees prior to June 1, 1998;

(7) total annual compensation for any appointee to such positions does not exceed the highest total annual compensation payable at the rate determined under section 104 of title 3; and

(8) all such positions are excluded from the collective bargaining unit.

(b) Individuals appointed under this section shall not be considered to be employees for purposes of subchapter II of chapter 75.

(Added Pub. L. 105–206, title I, §1201(a), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 712; amended Pub. L. 110–161, div. D, title I, §105, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1977; Pub. L. 113–6, div. F, title III, §1309, Mar. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 418.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The provisions of this title governing appointments in the competitive service, referred to in subsec. (a), are classified generally to section 3301 et seq. of this title.

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–6, which directed substitution of "Before September 30, 2013" for "Before July 23, 2013" wherever appearing, was executed by making the substitution for "before July 23, 2013" in introductory provisions to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

2007—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–161 substituted "before July 23, 2013" for "for a period of 10 years after the date of enactment of this section" in introductory provisions.

1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.
#### Emma D. Bond, Respondent, v. Curtis Hale et al., Defendants, and Ervin L. Eckert, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages impersonal injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of a collision in the State of Pennsylvania between a trailer-truck owned by defendant Ervin L. Eckert *691and an automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger, the said defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 8, 1960, denying his motion to vacate: (1) an order of the same court, dated November 18, 1959, permitting substituted service of the summons and verified complaint upon him; and (2) the service made thereunder. Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. The record affords no basis for holding that defendant Eckert is estopped from denying that he is a resident of New York. The information furnished in the accident investigation report which was filed in the office of the Pennsylvania State Police identified defendant Eckert’s residence to be in Pennsylvania, where his tractor was registered. Facts have not been shown indicating that defendant Eckert ever resided in New York. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
From: "DELONEY, SCOTT" <SDELONEY@idem.IN.gov> To: Edward Doty/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Kathleen Dagostino/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, John Summerhays/R5/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "PEDERSEN, CHRISTINE" <CPEDERSE@idem.IN.gov> Date: 09/14/2011 11:12 AM Subject: Redesignation/Maintenance Plan Clarification



### This note is to provide clarification concerning a statement referenced in Section 8.2 of Indiana’s Petitions for Redesignation and Maintenance Plans for the PM2.5 annual standard. In reference to the Action Level Response, Indiana’s documents include the following statement: “In the event that the Action Level is triggered and is not found to be due to an atypical unfavorable meteorological condition”....

I wish to clarify that Indiana considers an atypical unfavorable meteorological condition to be equivalent to the U.S. EPA’s interpretation of an exceptional event. This clarification pertains to Section 8.2 of Indiana’s submittals for Southwest Indiana, Northwest Indiana, Central Indiana, and Indiana’s portions of Louisville and Cincinnati.

I hope this clarification is helpful in your review of Indiana’s submittals. Please contact me if you need any further clarification or assistance.

Scott Deloney Air Programs Branch Office of Air Quality sdeloney @ idem

. in

. gov (317) 233-5694
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Manual on Industrial-Injury Statistics

              																	Kossoris, Max D. (Max Davis). 						*Manual on Industrial-Injury Statistics : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 667*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1940,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4174,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
| (a)   | The              Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 29, 2007,              which              accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements              of              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;              and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   | The              information contained the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter              ended April 30, 2006, which accompanies this certification, fairly              presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results              of              operation of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §3103. Employment at seat of Government only for services rendered

An individual may be employed in the civil service in an Executive department at the seat of Government only for services actually rendered in connection with and for the purposes of the appropriation from which he is paid. An individual who violates this section shall be removed from the service.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 415.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 46. | Aug. 5, 1882, ch. 389, §4 (less 255th through 316th words), 22 Stat. 255.Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1010, §7, 64 Stat. 986. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 47 (so much as relates to removal). | Aug. 23, 1912, ch. 350, §5 (so much as relates to removal), 37 Stat. 414. |

Statutes at Large

Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1010, §7, 64 Stat. 986.

The words "civil officer, draughtsman, copyist, messenger, assistant messenger, mechanic, watchman, laborer, or other employee" are omitted as obsolete language and "individual" is substituted therefor. The words "in the civil service" are added to preserve the application of former section 46 to civilian employees. The words "or subordinate bureaus or offices thereof" are omitted as surplusage. The words "and at the rate of pay usual and proper for the services" are omitted as surplusage since all pay rates are governed by statute.

All after the 75th words of section 4 of the Act of Aug. 5, 1882, as amended by section 7(b) of the Act of Sept. 23, 1950, except the 255th through 316th words, are omitted as executed. The 255th through 296th words are scheduled for repeal as superseded (see Table II–b), and the 297th through 316th words are codified in section 5501. The Act of Aug. 15, 1876, ch. 287, §5, 19 Stat. 169, cited as authority for former section 46 was repealed by section 7(a) of the Act of Sept. 23, 1950.

In the last sentence, the word "removed" is substituted for "summarily removed" because of the provisions of the Lloyd-LaFollette Act, 37 Stat. 555, as amended, and the Veterans' Preference Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 387, as amended, which are carried into this title.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
### SUBCHAPTER I—LAW ENFORCEMENT
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Tradequest International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Luis Alvarez, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

May 15, 2006                            /s/ Luis Alvarez
                                        ----------------
                                        Luis Alvarez, CEO,
                                        principal executive officer
                                        and principal accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 941.842 Federal inspections. ( a ) Part 842 of this chapter, *Federal Inspections,* shall apply to all exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) The Office will furnish a copy of any inspection report or enforcement action taken to the South Dakota Department of Water and Natural Resources upon request.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Christopher J. Dyball, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Drexler Technology
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

        (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

        (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 11, 2004

/s/ Christopher J. Dyball
-------------------------
Christopher J. Dyball
Co-Chief Executive Officer
(Co-Principal Executive Officer)


                                       49
March 25, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Additional Information Regarding Contend, LLC's Section 333 Petition for 

Exemption [Docket No. FAA-2015-0155]

To Whom it May Concern:

This letter is to clarify that the petitioner is incorrectly identified as "Contend Corp." on 

the first page of the Petition for Exemption. The correct name of the petitioner is "Contend,

LLC."

If you have any other questions, or need any additional information to process this

exemption request, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

Very truly yours, 

Matthew J. Clark

Mark E. McKinnon

Mark A. Dombroff 

 

 Counsel for Contend, LLC

Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com

Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336.8714

Matthew J. Clark

703.336.871

Email Address

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com
### SUBCHAPTER III—POLITICAL ACTIVITIES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–94, §2(a), Oct. 6, 1993, 107 Stat. 1001, reenacted subchapter heading without change.