alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5737a. Employees temporarily deployed in contingency operations

(a) Definitions.—For purposes of this section—

(1) the term "covered employee" means an individual who—

(A) is an employee of an Executive agency or a military department, excluding a Government controlled corporation; and

(B) is assigned on a temporary change of station in support of a contingency operation;

(2) the term "temporary change of station", as used with respect to an employee, means an assignment—

(A) from the employee's official duty station to a temporary duty station; and

(B) for which such employee is eligible for expenses under section 5737; and

(3) the term "contingency operation" has the meaning given such term by section 1482a(c) of title 10.

(b) Quarters and Rations.—The head of an agency may provide quarters and rations, without charge, to any covered employee of such agency during the period of such employee's temporary assignment (as described in subsection (a)(1)(B)).

(c) Storage of Motor Vehicle.—The head of an agency may provide for the storage, without charge, or for the reimbursement of the cost of storage, of a motor vehicle that is owned or leased by a covered employee of such agency (or by a dependent of such an employee) and that is for the personal use of the covered employee. This subsection shall apply—

(1) with respect to storage during the period of the employee's temporary assignment (as described in subsection (a)(1)(B)); and

(2) in the case of a covered employee, with respect to not more than one motor vehicle as of any given time.

(d) Relationship to Other Benefits.—Any benefits under this section shall be in addition to (and not in lieu of) any other benefits for which the covered employee is otherwise eligible.

(Added Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title XI, §1104(a), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 346.)
### §3105a. Classified intelligence budget justification materials

#### (a) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Budget

The term "budget" has the meaning given the term "budget of the President" in section 3097 of this title.

#### (2) Classified intelligence budget justification materials

The term "classified intelligence budget justification materials" means, with respect to a fiscal year, the materials submitted to Congress by the Director of National Intelligence in support of the budget for that fiscal year that are classified or otherwise protected from public disclosure.

#### (b) Timely submission

Not later than 5 days after the date on which the President submits to Congress the budget for each fiscal year pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees the classified intelligence budget justification materials for the element for that budget.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title V, §506J, as added Pub. L. 117–263, div. F, title LXIII, §6305, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3504.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3105a, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title V, §506J, as added Pub. L. 113–126, title III, §306(a), July 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 1395, required annual assessments of intelligence community performance by function, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LVII, §5701(c), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2160.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1202 

Expressing support for the recognition of May 5 through May 11, 2024, 

as Wildfire Preparedness Week, the national event educating the public 

on fire safety and preparedness, and supporting the goals of a Wildfire 

Preparedness Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2024 

Mrs. TORRES of California (for herself, Mr. HUFFMAN, and Ms. JACOBS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the recognition of May 5 through 

May 11, 2024, as Wildfire Preparedness Week, the national event educating the public on fire safety and preparedness, and supporting the goals of a Wildfire Preparedness Week. 

Whereas Wildfire Preparedness Week increases awareness of 

the threat of wildfires and knowledge of lifesaving tactics; 

Whereas Wildfire Preparedness Week, like other designated 

weeks or days for natural disasters, promotes educational 

initiatives, encourages community programming, and increases overall knowledge and preparedness; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1202 IH 

Whereas the effects of long-term exposure to wildfire smoke 

will harm more people, as particle pollution triggers asthma attacks, heart attacks, and strokes, and can kill; 

Whereas firefighters are on the frontlines and are at an increased risk of developing cancer and respiratory diseases 

because they are exposed to smoke and hazardous chemicals in the line of duty; 

Whereas, in 2023, there were 56,580 wildfires that burned 

2,693,910 acres, and in California there were 7,127 

wildfires and over 324,917 acres burned; 

Whereas nearly 85 percent of wildland fires in the United 

States are caused by humans; 

Whereas, from January 1, 2024, there have been over 11,523 

wildfires and over 1,802,756 acres burned; 

Whereas the wildfire season in California increases every year 

in length and frequency of fires; 

Whereas the United States experienced a large number of 

wildfires from West Coast to East Coast; and 

Whereas preventative measures exist to help individuals and 

communities increase their fire resilience through— 

(1) evacuation planning and assistance for people 

and their animals; 

(2) vegetation and forest management; and 

(3) limited use of combustibles during high heat or 

drier seasons, including fireworks, exhaust, and open 

flames: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals of Wildfire Preparedness 

3 Week; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1202 IH 

1 (2) supports resources and educational initia2 tives that communicate how affected communities 

3 can take preventative measures such as instituting 

4 early warning systems and reducing unplanned 

5 human ignitions, as well as how to safely and effi6 ciently evacuating people and their animals; and 

7 (3) encourages increased awareness of and pre8 paredness for the threat of wildfires and subsequent 

9 suppression efforts. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### §5372a. Contract appeals board members

(a) For the purpose of this section—

(1) the term "contract appeals board member" means a member of an agency board of contract appeals appointed under section 7105(a)(2), (c)(2), or (d)(2) of title 41 or a member of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals appointed under section 7105(b)(2) of title 41; and

(2) the term "appeals board" means an agency board of contract appeals established pursuant to section 7105(a)(1), (c)(1), or (d)(1) of title 41.

(b) Rates of basic pay for contract appeals board members shall be as follows:

(1) Chairman of an appeals board—the rate of basic pay payable for level IV of the Executive Schedule.

(2) Vice chairman of an appeals board—97 percent of the rate under paragraph (1).

(3) Other members of an appeals board—94 percent of the rate under paragraph (1).

(c) Rates of pay taking effect under this section shall be printed in the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations.

(Added Pub. L. 101–509, title V, §529 [title I, §104(a)(2)], Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1427, 1446; amended Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VIII, §847(f)(1), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3395; Pub. L. 111–350, §5(a)(9), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3841.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Level IV of the Executive Schedule, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is set out in section 5315 of this title.

#### Amendments

2011—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 111–350, §5(a)(9)(A), substituted "section 7105(a)(2), (c)(2), or (d)(2) of title 41" for "section 8 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978" and "section 7105(b)(2) of title 41" for "section 42 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act".

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 111–350, §5(a)(9)(B), substituted "section 7105(a)(1), (c)(1), or (d)(1) of title 41" for "section 8 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978".

2006—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 109–163 inserted "or a member of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals appointed under section 42 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act" after "of 1978".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VIII, §847(g), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3395, provided that: "Section 42 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, as added by this section, and the amendments and repeals made by this section [enacting section 438 of Title 41, Public Contracts, amending this section and sections 601 and 607 of Title 41, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 607 of Title 41], shall take effect 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 6, 2006]."

#### Effective Date

Section effective on such date as the President shall determine, but not earlier than 90 days, and not later than 180 days, after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 529 [title III, §305] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 5301 of this title.
### §403h. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403h, comprising section 7 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, act June 20, 1949, ch. 227, was editorially reclassified as section 3508 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.0


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report of CyberOptics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Kathleen P. Iverson, Chief Executive Officer, and Scott G.
Larson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                               /s/ Kathleen P. Iverson
                               ---------------------------------------------
                               Kathleen P. Iverson
                               Chief Executive Officer.
                               March 26, 2004

                               /s/ Scott G. Larson
                               ---------------------------------------------
                               Scott G. Larson
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               March 26, 2004
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                CONSENT OF MOSS ADAMS LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Carver Corporation

      We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-65006, 33-70902, 33-50076, 33-31344,
33-23167 and 33-04273) of our reports on the financial statements dated February
6, 1998, except for Note 2, as to which the date is March 20, 1998, which appear
in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Carver Corporation, and
to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus.


                                                   /s/ MOSS ADAMS LLP


Seattle, Washington
February 6, 1998
(except for Note 2, as to
which the date is March 20, 1998).
§ 1907.23 Designation of authority to hear challenges. ( a ) *Chief, Classification Management and Collaboration Group* shall be responsible for the initial Agency decision in a classification challenge.
( b ) *Agency Release Panel (ARP).* Appeals of denials of classification challenges shall be reviewed by the ARP which shall issue the final Agency decision in accordance with 1907.25(c).
( c ) *ARP membership:* The ARP is chaired by the Chief, Information Review and Release Group and composed of the Information Review Officers from the various Directorates and the Director, Central Intelligence Agency area, as well as the representatives of the various release programs and offices. The Information and Privacy Coordinator also serves as Executive Secretary of the Panel.
[76 FR 59032, Sept. 23, 2011]
NO. 12-20-00221-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BRADLEY DION FERRELL, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 173RD 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, Bradley Dion Ferrell, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is 

signed by Appellant and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal.

Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered November 30, 2020.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 30, 2020

NO. 12-20-00221-CR

BRADLEY DION FERRELL,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 173rd District Court

of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CR18-0780-173)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 4, 2009 

p0128 

Order 

 

February 4, 2009 

137344 & (19) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137344 

 COA: 286260 

Kent CC: 06-003858-FC 

TERRY JAMES CASHA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion to file a reply to the prosecutor’s answer is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2008 order of the Court of 

Appeals is considered and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6



                               September 30, 2003



Sionix Corporation
9272 Jeronimo Road, Suite 108
Irvine, CA 92618

         Re:   STOCK RESTRICTION AGREEMENT; CANCELLATION OF SHARES
               ---------------------------------------------------

Dear Sirs:

         This is to confirm that, pursuant to a Stock Restriction Agreement
between the undersigned and Sionix Corporation (the "Agreement"), during 1999
and 2000 Sionix Corporation awarded an aggregate of 237,160 shares of Common
Stock (the "Award Shares") to the undersigned. The Agreement provided that the
Award Shares were subject to substantial restrictions, and could not be sold or
transferred until certain conditions were met.

         Since the conditions in the Agreement have not been met, we have agreed
that the Award Shares will be cancelled immediately. Accordingly, accompanying
this letter are certificates representing all of the Award Shares for
cancellation. The undersigned hereby transfers the Award Shares to you for
cancellation, and agrees to execute any Stock Assignment or Stock Power you may
request.

          Please instruct your Transfer Agent to cancel the certificates, remove
the shares from the stock register, and return the shares to the status of
authorized but unissued shares on its records.


                                                     Very truly yours,

                                                     /S/ ROBERT E. MCCRAY
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Robert E. McCray

Agreed and accepted:

Sionix Corporation

By JAMES J. HOUTZ
   --------------
ERxhibit 10.287



                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$9,184.00                                                   Glendale, California
   June 29, 2000




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  Thuan Chau (Payor") promises to pay in lawful money of
the  United  States of  America to  Pollution  Research  and  Control  Corp.,  a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale,  California, the sum of
$9,184.00  Dollars  from the date  hereof on the  unpaid  principal  payable  in
installments  of principal only in the sum of $50.00 Dollars  commencing on July
15,  2000 and  payable  on the same day of each month  thereafter  until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each  installment  under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce  payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately  due and payable if such  default is not cured  within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned  written notice of such default.  The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's  common stock,  no par value (the
"Shares"),  pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge  Agreement,  dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason,  the unpaid  balance of this note shall be  cancelled,  and the pro rata
portion  of Shares  which then not fully paid for,  shall be  returned  to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                            Payor:



                                            By:  /s/  Thuan Chau
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Thuan Chau
EXHIBIT 23




                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
FNB Corp.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-72686) on Form S-8 of FNB Corp. of our report dated March 7, 1997, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of FNB Corp. and subsidiary as of December
31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996
annual report on Form 10-KSB of FNB Corp.




                                                          KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Greensboro, North Carolina
March 31, 1997




<PAGE>
On May 18, 2011, representatives of Trane (I ngersoll Rand) met with DOE and Navigant Consulting to discuss DOE’s Request for Information on alternative efficiency determination methods (AEDMs) and alternative rating methods (ARMs), wh ich was published on April 18, 2011. 76 FR 21673. This meeting was requested by Trane and occurred at their facility in Clarksville, Tennessee with the following people in attendance:

Ashley Armstrong, DOE Jay Baggett, Trane Richard Bishop, Trane Richard Campbell, Trane Al Fullerton, Trane Andrew Geffken, Navigant Consulting Jill Hootman, Trane Ken Parks, Trane Jim VerShaw, Trane Roger Voorhis, Trane

The Trane representatives made several key poi nts pertaining to issues in the Request for
Information:

1) AEDMs and ARMs are applicable to both reside ntial and commercial heating, ventilation and airconditioning (HVAC)products, but Trane tests furn aces instead of using simulations because of safety concerns. Additionally, water heaters and bo ilers may be difficult to accurately model.

2) The second round of substantiation testing for an AEDM to be applied to commercial HVAC and water heaters is unnecessary and sufficient accuracy can be achieved through a single round of testing.

3) There is no added value in requiring pre-approval for either ARMs or AEDMs. This requirement would only add additional burden to the manufact urers and could lead to delays in making products available to consumers.

4) The current 1% tolerance for overall averages between AEDM predicted efficiency and tested efficiency is exceedingly strict and unreasonable. A more appropriate tolerance is between 3%
and 5%.

5) Standardized tolerances across similar products are feasible, but a single standardized set for all products may not be.

6) For low-volume, custom products, Trane believes that sufficient accuracy for substantiation can be accomplished by testing one unit. If necessary, a second unit could be tested, but not more than that because of the excessive costs of testing certa in units. For example, the testing of a large HVAC unit can cost between $30,000 a nd $50,000. Additionally, 3rd party test labs are operating at close to capacity and may not be able to me et the new demand that would be created if DOE required more testing for substantiation of AEDMs and ARMs.7) When there is a change in standards, manufact urers should re-substantiate an AEDM or ARM with units that are capable of m eeting the new standard levels.

8) The creation of a standardized package for verification to streamline the process of DOE review was discussed. This package would give manufact urers a sense of security in knowing exactly
which documents need to be submitted to DOE and also reduce the likelihood of requests for additional documentation. Trane agreed that the package would need to include the underlying
test data used to substantiate the AEDM or ARM as well as specific unit numbers. However, Trane suggested that a summary of the test data or AEDM/ARM output might be better than requiring all data because of the complexity of these programs and also because of the volume of data which is collected during the actual testing of units.