alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.51


 


BASE
SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT


 


As of February 1, 2006, the Compensation
Committee of Focus Enhancements Inc. (Focus) set the following base salaries
(on an annual basis) for our named executive officers: 


 


	
  Brett Moyer

  President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  326,025

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Michael Conway

  Senior Vice President of Strategy and Business Development

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  171,250

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Thomas Hamilton

  Executive Vice President and GM of Semiconductor Group

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  185,000

  	
  *

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Peter Mor

  Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  210,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Gary Williams

  Executive Vice President of Finance & CFO

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  215,250

  	
   

  



 






* Mr. Hamilton’s base salary was not adjusted. Mr. Hamilton’s
salary is scheduled to be reviewed in July 2006.


 


Each of the named executive officers will be
eligible to receive a discretionary bonus for 2006 between 25% and 50% of their
base salary.


 


Like all employees of Focus, each of the named
executive officers is also eligible to receive an allocation pursuant to Focus’
401(k) Plan.


 


Each of the named executive officers is also
eligible to participate in Focus’ Stock Incentive Plans.
§ 339.9 Public access to effective guidance documents. ( a ) The DoD Regulatory Policy Team shall: ( 1 ) Ensure all final guidance documents in effect are identified by a unique identifier which includes, at a minimum, the document's title and date of issuance or revision and its Z-RIN, if applicable, are published and maintained on a central website located at *https://open.defense.gov/Regulatory-Program/Guidance-Documents/* in a single, searchable, indexed database, and available to the public;
( 2 ) Note on its website that guidance documents do not bind the public, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract;
( 3 ) Announce on its website a means for the public to comment electronically on any guidance documents that are subject to the notice and comment procedures; and
( 4 ) Receive complaints from the public that a component of the Department is not following the requirements of OMB's Memorandum M-20-02, “Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13891, Titled “Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents”,” dated October 31, 2019, or is improperly treating a guidance document as a binding requirement.
( b ) Each component responsible for issuing guidance documents shall: ( 1 ) Submit final guidance documents to the DoD Regulatory Policy Team at the email address *osd.mc-alex.ocmo.mbx.guidance-documents@mail.mil* for posting to the Department's central website.
( 2 ) Address complaints from the public that they are not following the requirements of OMB's Memorandum M-20-02, “Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13891, Titled “Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents”,” dated October 31, 2019, or are improperly treating a guidance document as a binding requirement.
Responses to Questions EPA Posed in December 20, 2012 Final Rule on Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste 

Reconsideration and Final Amendments; Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste: 

Non-Pulp & Paper Facilities

# Industry Sector Boiler Type (kilns, stoker, 

circulating fluidized bed, etc.) 

Traditional Fuel Questions 

Fuel Type i.e. fuel oil, #6 bunker C, etc. 

1 Power Plant stoker boilers with traveling 

grates to remove the ash 

Startup with natural gas then go to 100% co100% biomass. They prefer at least 50% biWith 50% or more biomass that may use the fertilizer. 

2 Electricity generator. Power and steam 

generation only. Consumes all steam and some power but most is sold to the grid. 

Stoker Has used fuel oil in the past. 100% biomass 

scrap ties, are used as fuel. NG used only aplant shutdown to restart. 

3 Electricity generator. Power and steam 

generation only. Consumes all steam and some power but most is sold to the grid. 

2 cogeneration stations, one using a stoker and the other uses the fluidized bed. 

100% biomass including scrap ties, are useNG used only after a plant shutdown to restoil can be burned if nozzles were installed. 

4 Electricity generator. Produces power and 

steam. Consumes all steam and some power but most is sold to the grid. 

Stoker Capable of burning fuel oil but does so only 

up. Burns 100% biomass including scrap tie

5 Generating Station/Resource Recovery 

Facility 

Fluidized Bed Boiler (x2) Wood Waste 

6 Power Generation Traveling Grate Ground up railroad ties, biomass (bark and 

from satellite wood-yards & sawmills and forresiduals from clearing. Originally designed coal. 

7 Paper/Power Bubbling Bed Currently- Biomass, coal, ground up railroad 

sludge. Next Phase: All the above except coal. 

8 Electrical Power Traveling Grate Whole railroad ties, creosote treated wood, 

untreated construction & demolition wood 

9 Power Generating Traveling Grate Biomass-yard waste-C&D-landfill gas-TDF, 

railroad ties 

10 Power Generation Circulation fluidized bed Natural Gas, recycled material (agricultural 

railroad ties). Cannot burn fuel oil at this tim

11 Power Generation Traveling grate boiler Natural Gas, propane, 

recycled materials (agricultural biomass, cleconstruction wood, railroad ties), could burn without modification to the boiler if an approdelivery system was installed 

1 It should be noted that the boilers could be retrofit with nozzles and a delivery system to burn fuel oil and other liquid fuels but the facilities sh

systems installed at the present time.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1117 

Opposing efforts to place one-sided pressure on Israel with respect to Gaza. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2024 

Ms. SALAZAR (for herself, Mrs. CAMMACK, Mrs. KIGGANS of Virginia, Mrs. 

MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. LANGWORTHY, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. 

RESCHENTHALER, Mr. SELF, Mr. TONY GONZALES of Texas, Mr. ADERHOLT, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. WILLIAMS of New York, Mr. NUNN of Iowa, 

Mr. TIFFANY, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Mr. LAWLER, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. MAST, 

Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. LAMBORN, 

Mr. ARMSTRONG, Mr. D’ESPOSITO, Mrs. HINSON, and Ms. STEFANIK) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Opposing efforts to place one-sided pressure on Israel with 

respect to Gaza. 

Whereas, on October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists launched a 

massive, unprovoked war on Israel by air, land, and sea, 

including firing thousands of rockets; 

Whereas the Hamas October 7 attack resulted in the murder 

of over 1,200 innocent people, the taking of over 250 innocent hostages, and widespread sexual assault and torture, and the victims and hostages include United States 

citizens; 

Whereas Israel has a right to self-defense; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1117 IH 

Whereas the State of Israel was founded on May 14, 1948, 

and recognized by the United States as a State the same 

day; 

Whereas Israel has been designated by the United States 

Government as a major non-NATO ally; 

Whereas, in 2014, Congress designated Israel as a ‘‘major 

strategic partner’’; 

Whereas the United States and Israel have a close and robust 

bilateral relationship marked by strong people-to-people 

ties and close cooperation on a wide range of issues including defense, diplomacy, energy, cybersecurity, agriculture, science, and space; and 

Whereas, on April 4, 2024, a White House press release stated that President Biden ‘‘underscored that an immediate 

ceasefire is essential to stabilize and improve the humanitarian situation and protect innocent civilians’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) stands with Israel as it defends itself 

3 against the barbaric war launched by Hamas and 

4 other terrorists; 

5 (2) reaffirms Israel’s right to self-defense; and 

6 (3) opposes efforts to place one-sided pressure 

7 on Israel with respect to Gaza, including calls for an 

8 immediate cease-fire, such as the recent statement 

9 by President Biden and United Nations Security 

10 Council Resolution 2728, which was adopted due to 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1117 IH 

1 the Biden administration’s decision not to exercise 

2 the United States veto. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Zond-PanAero Windsystem Partners I (the
Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mary H.
Cilia, Chief Financial Officer of Zond Windsystems Management LLC, as General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of
my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


Date: March 31, 2005
                                   /s/ MARY H. CILIA
                                   ------------------------------
                                  Mary H. Cilia
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   Zond Windsystems Management LLC, as General
                                   Partner of Zond-PanAero Windsystem Partners I
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of Experimental Icing Simulation Capability for Full-Scale Swept Wings: Hybrid Design Process, Years 1 and 2This report presents the key results from the first two years of a program to develop experimental icing simulation capabilities for full-scale swept wings. This investigation was undertaken as a part of a larger collaborative research effort on ice accretion and aerodynamics for large-scale swept wings. Ice accretion and the resulting aerodynamic effect on large-scale swept wings presents a significant airplane design and certification challenge to air frame manufacturers, certification authorities, and research organizations alike. While the effect of ice accretion on straight wings has been studied in detail for many years, the available data on swept-wing icing are much more limited, especially for larger scales.Document ID20180001238Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsFujiwara, Gustavo*(Washington Univ. Seattle, WA, United States)*Bragg, Mike*(Washington Univ. Seattle, WA, United States)*Triphahn, Chris*(Illinois Univ. Urbana, IL, United States)*Wiberg, Brock*(Illinois Univ. Urbana, IL, United States)*Woodard, Brian*(Illinois Univ. Urbana, IL, United States)*Loth, Eric*(Virginia Univ. Charlottesville, VA, United States)*Malone, Adam*(Boeing Commercial Airplane Group Seattle, WA, United States)*Paul, Bernard*(Boeing Commercial Airplane Group Seattle, WA, United States)*Pitera, David*(Boeing Research and Technology Huntington Beach, CA, United States)*Wilcox, Pete*(Boeing Research and Technology Huntington Beach, CA, United States)*Khodadoust, Abdi*(Boeing Research and Technology Huntington Beach, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 15, 2018Publication DateDecember 1, 2017Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberE-19420NASA/CR-2017-219573GRC-E-DAA-TN46251Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 648987.02.02.03.66CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX12AB04ACONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AC04-94AL85000Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsAircraft icingScale modelsAerodynamicsAvailable DownloadsNameType20180001238.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Dear Colleague:

The U.S. Department of Education requests your participation in updating your 

listing in the Education Resources Organization Directory (EROD)

Please review the verification report below.  A customer comment section is also provided for your convenience should you wish to give any comments or suggestions. 

If there are changes, deletions, or additions you wish to make, you may make them on the online verification form or you may reply to this email and denote changes with an "*".

If there are no changes that need to be made, please reply to this email with "no changes". 

Note: If the link above is not working properly, please copy and paste the following url to your web browser.

http://wWW.ed.gov/erod

--------------------------------------------------------------

LOCATION INFORMATION

Service, Program, or Organization Name: 

Address 1: Address 2: 

Address 3: 

City: 

State: 

Zip: 

 

CONTACT INFORMATION

Phone: 

Toll-free: 

Toll-free Restrictions: 

TTY: 

Fax: 

E-mail Address: 

E-mail Address 2: 

WWW Address: 

 

OPERATING INFORMATION

Director's Name 1:  

Director's Title 1: 

Director's Name 2: 

Director's Title 2: 

Director's Name 3: 

Director's Title 3: 

Contact's Name:  

Contact's Title: 

Sponsoring Agency: 

Description: 

Hours of Operation and Days Open: 

Time Zone: 

 

INDEXING INFORMATION

Audience(s: 

Service(s): 

State(s)/ Territory(ies) Served: 

Publication(s): 

Subject(s): 

Special Collections: 



SUBMITTER INFORMATION

First Name: 

Last Name: 

Title: Executive 

Phone: 

Email: 

--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENTS (OPTIONAL)

We value your opinion and have provided these optional questions to assist us in evaluating and improving the directory and our service.  

1. The information in this EROD verification report is requested once per year.  Should we update your organization's information every 6 months, yearly, or other (please list)?

2. Are the reporting instructions and the format clear, concise, well organized, and easy to follow?  If not, please provide your suggestion for improvement.

3. Based on your experience, was customer service courteous, prompt, and clearly communicated?  If not, please provide your suggestion for improvement.

4. Are there other fields/types of information that you would like to see included in the directory? If so, please specify the desired information.

5. Please provide any additional comments/suggestions about the annual information verification process, the directory, or website.

--------------------------------------------------------------

We appreciate your time and effort in assisting us to provide the best resources for

people in need of education information.

Thank you for your time,

EROD Staff
### §273. Professional responsibility and quality review

#### (a) In general

The Director of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services shall be responsible for—

(1) conducting investigations of noncriminal allegations of misconduct, corruption, and fraud involving any employee of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services that are not subject to investigation by the Inspector General for the Department;

(2) inspecting the operations of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services and providing assessments of the quality of the operations of such bureau as a whole and each of its components; and

(3) providing an analysis of the management of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services.

#### (b) Special considerations

In providing assessments in accordance with subsection (a)(2) with respect to a decision of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, or any of its components, consideration shall be given to—

(1) the accuracy of the findings of fact and conclusions of law used in rendering the decision;

(2) any fraud or misrepresentation associated with the decision; and

(3) the efficiency with which the decision was rendered.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §453, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2199.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date on which the transfer of functions specified under section 251 of this title takes effect, see section 455 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 271 of this title.
#### § 1909.12 Termination of access.

The Coordinator shall cancel any authorization and deny any further access whenever the Director of Security cancels the security clearance of any person who has been granted access to classified CIA information under the part; or whenever the Senior Agency Official, or the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, determines that continued access would no longer be consistent with the requirements of this part; or at the conclusion of the authorized period of up to two years if there is no renewal under § 1909.11.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference of our report dated March 2, 1998 and to all reference to our firm, 
included in this Form 10-K into the Company's previously filed Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-97640, 333-03771, 333-03769, 333-09549 
and 333-47433), and the Company's previously filed Registration Statement on 
Form S-3 (File No. 333-34345).

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
-----------------------------

Atlanta, Georgia
   
March 20, 1998
### SUBCHAPTER IV—NATIONAL SECURITY
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

The State of Texas, Appellant

No. 06-13-00109-CR v.

Earl Scott Chesnut, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1021768). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 12, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 19 July 2007 – FG Marine v Commission**

**(Case T-360/04)**

Non-contractual liability – Decision ordering repayment of State aid granted by France to the company Stardust Marine – Annulment of the decision by judgment of the Court

1.                     *Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para.,
and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 33-34)*

2.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Cumulative nature – Damage – Causal link – Burden of proof (Arts 235 EC and 288,
second para., EC) (see paras 40-41, 50-53)*

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| CLAIM for compensation for loss allegedly caused by Commission Decision 2000/513/EC of 8 September 1999 on aid granted by France to the company Stardust Marine. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Dismisses the action as unfounded; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
### **CHAPTER 1029—LAND TRANSFERS**

Sec.
102901.
Conveyance of property and interests in property in System units or related areas.
# C_2010037EN.01003201.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2009 — Arizmendi and Others v Council and Commission

(Joined Cases T-440/03, T-121/04, T-171/04, T-208/04, T-365/04 and T-484/04 (1))

1

(Non-contractual liability - Customs Union - Action for failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Reasoned Opinion - Abolition in French legislation of the monopoly of the profession of ship brokers - Sufficiently serious breach - Causal link)

2010/C 37/40

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Jean Arizmendi (Bayonne, France) and the 60 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the judgment (represented in Case T-440/03 by: J.-F. Péricaud, P. Péricaud and M. Tournois and, in Cases T-121/04, T-171/04, T-208/04, T-365/04 and T-484/04, by J.-F. Péricaud and M. Tournois, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented initially by J.-P. Jacqué and M. Giorgi Fort, then by F. Florindo Gijón and M. Balta, Agents); and the European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis and, in Case T-121/04, by X. Lewis and B. Stromsky, Agents)

Defendants:

Intervener in support of the applicants in Case T-440/03: Chambre nationale des courtiers maritimes de France (National Chamber of French ship brokers), Paris, France (represented by: J.-F. Péricaud, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the applicants in Case T-440/03:

Re:

Re:

Action for damages, brought under Article 235 EC and Article 288 EC, second paragraph, seeking compensation from the Community for the damage caused by the abolition of the monopoly of the French profession of ship brokers.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders Mr Jean Arizmendi and the 60 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to bear their own costs and those of the Council of the European Union and the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Jean Arizmendi and the 60 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to bear their own costs and those of the Council of the European Union and the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Chambre nationale des courtiers maritimes de France to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Chambre nationale des courtiers maritimes de France to bear its own costs;

| 4. | Orders the Council and the Commission to bear their own costs incurred by the intervention of the Chambre nationale des courtiers maritimes de France. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Council and the Commission to bear their own costs incurred by the intervention of the Chambre nationale des courtiers maritimes de France.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 6.3.2004.

1

---