alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2003



                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                           Report Dated March 13, 2003

                            New Skies Satellites N.V.

                              Rooseveltplantsoen 4
                                2517 KR The Hague
                                 The Netherlands

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

         Form 20-F...X...                               Form 40-F......


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         Yes......                                      No...X...


If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
..............................N/A...................................

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



New Skies Satellites N.V.



By:    /s/ Mary J. Dent
       ------------------
Name:  Mary J. Dent
Title: General Counsel and Management Board Member

Date:  April 3, 2003

<PAGE>

Exhibit Index:


1.1  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated February 28, 2003.
1.2  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 6, 2003.
1.3  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 7, 2003.
1.4  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 11, 2003.
1.5  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 13, 2003.
1.6  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 14, 2003.
1.7  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 17, 2003.
1.8  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 25, 2003.
EXHIBIT 11

          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                      CTC COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

               (In Thousands Except Per Share Data)


                                             Year ended March 31
                                        1997         1996         1995
                                     ---------------------------------- 
Primary:
 Average shares outstanding            9,600        9,446        7,830 
 Net effect of stock options, if
  dilutive, based on the treasury
  stock method using the average
  market price                         1,174        1,266          935
                                     ----------------------------------  
Total                                 10,774       10,712        8,765
                                     ==================================
Net income                            $4,683       $4,094       $1,472
                                     ==================================
Net income per share                  $  .43       $  .38       $  .17
                                     ==================================

Fully diluted:
 Average shares outstanding            9,600        9,446        7,830 
 Net effect of stock options, if
  dilutive, based on the treasury
  stock method using the year-end
  market price                         1,190        1,282        1,531
                                     ----------------------------------  
Total                                 10,790       10,728        9,361
                                     ==================================
Net income                            $4,683       $4,094       $1,472
                                     ==================================
Net income per share                  $  .43       $  .38       $  .16
                                     ==================================
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 20 40 80

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Closed to leasing of non-energy solid minerals

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Sage-grouse Priority/Core Habitat Areas

Sage-grouse Connectivity Habitat Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2-24: Alternative A

Areas Closed to Non-energy 

Solid Leasable Minerals
§ 77.1906 Hoists; daily inspection. ( a ) Hoists used to transport persons shall be inspected daily. The inspection shall include examination of the headgear (headframe, sheave wheels, etc.), connections, links and chains, and other facilities.
( b ) Prior to each working shift, and before a hoist is returned to service after it has been out of normal service for any reason, the hoist shall be run by the hoist operator through one complete cycle of operation before any person is permitted to be transported.
( c ) At the completion of each daily examination required by paragraph (a) of this section, the person making the examination shall certify, by signature and date, that the examination has been made. If any unsafe condition in the hoisting equipment is present, the person conducting the examination shall make a record of the condition and the date. Certifications and records shall be retained for one year.
(Sec. 101, Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, Pub. L. 91-173 as amended by Pub. L. 95-164, 91 Stat. 1291 (30 U.S.C. 811))
[48 FR 53242, Nov. 25, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
#### § 77.802 Protection of high-voltage circuits; neutral grounding resistors; disconnecting devices.

High-voltage circuits supplying portable or mobile equipment shall contain either a direct or derived neutral which shall be grounded through a suitable resistor at the source transformers, and a grounding circuit, originating at the grounded side of the grounding resistor, shall extend along with the power conductors and serve as a grounding conductor for the frames of all high-voltage equipment supplied power from that circuit, except that the Secretary or his authorized representative may permit other high-voltage circuits to feed stationary electrical equipment, if he finds that such exception will not pose a hazard to the miners. Disconnecting devices shall be installed and so equipped or designed in such a manner that it can be determined by visual observation that the power is disconnected.
Exhibit 1.3



                                    Autoriteit
                                    Financiet Markten




Form for the disclosure of securities transactions
in the own issuing institution

<PAGE>


Form for the disclosure of securities transactions in the own issuing
institution



Part 1


1.  Name of issuing institution:                       New Skies Satellites N.V.

2.  Name of person obliged to notify:                  New Skies Satellites N.V.


Sort of security
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3.  Sort of security: Ordinary shares

    (Share/Bond/Option/Warrant/other)

4. To be filled out if applicable:

      Nominal value of the security:                   0.05 EUR

      Optional series (call option/put option):

      Exercise price:

      Expiration date:


Transaction in the security indicated in questions 3 and 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


5.  Date of the transaction: 06-03-03

6a. Number of securities acquired in the transaction:  505,030

 b. Number of securities sold in the transaction:

7.  Price of the securities:                           3.90EUR

8.  Open/Close (in case of options)





To the best of my knowledge and belief I certify that the information set forth
in this statement is true, complete and correct:


New Skies Satellites N.V., Mary J. Dent, General Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Name

Rooseveltplantsoen 4                                           7 March 2003
--------------------------------------------------------       -----------------
Address                                                        Date

2517 KR The Hague
--------------------------------------------------------       -----------------
Postal code & city & country                                   Signature
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 29, 2003



                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

             Report for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003


                             DYNEA INTERNATIONAL OY

                      13 Snellmaninkatu, Helsinki, Finland

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

         Form 20-F  |_|                            Form 40-F  |_|


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         Yes   |_|                                 No  |X|


If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
                  N/A

<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                           DYNEA INTERNATIONAL OY





                                           By: /s/ Filip Frankenhaeuser
                                               --------------------------
                                               Name: Filip Frankenhaeuser
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer





Date: August 29, 2003

<PAGE>

Exhibit 1.1 Report for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
### §5403. Human Capital Performance Fund

(a) There is hereby established the Human Capital Performance Fund, to be administered by the Office for the purpose of this chapter.

(b)(1)(A) An agency shall submit a plan as described in section 5406 to be eligible for consideration by the Office for an allocation under this section. An allocation shall be made only upon approval by the Office of an agency's plan.

(B)(i) After the reduction for training required under section 5408, ninety percent of the remaining amount appropriated to the Fund may be allocated by the Office to the agencies. Of the amount to be allocated, an agency's pro rata distribution may not exceed its pro rata share of Executive branch payroll.

(ii) If the Office does not allocate an agency's full pro rata share, the undistributed amount remaining from that share will become available for distribution to other agencies, as provided in subparagraph (C).

(C)(i) After the reduction for training under section 5408, ten percent of the remaining amount appropriated to the Fund, as well as the amount of the pro rata share not distributed because of an agency's failure to submit a satisfactory plan, shall be allocated among agencies with exceptionally high-quality plans.

(ii) An agency with an exceptionally high-quality plan is eligible to receive an additional distribution in addition to its full pro rata distribution.

(2) Each agency is required to provide to the Office such payroll information as the Office specifies necessary to determine the Executive branch payroll.

(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title XI, §1129(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1642.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5403, added Pub. L. 95–454, title V, §501, Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1182; amended Pub. L. 98–615, title II, §201(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3209; Pub. L. 101–509, title V, §529 [title I, §101(b)(4)(C)], Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1427, 1439; Pub. L. 102–378, §2(38), Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1351, related to general pay increases, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–89, §3(a)(1), (c), Sept. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 981, 983, eff. Nov. 1, 1993.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of James Harten, Deceased.

Motion to strike affidavit from records of this court denied, without prejudice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
#### § 1615.5 Persons not to be registered.

No person who is not required by selective service law or the Proclamation of the President to register shall be registered.
#### § 77.900-2 Testing, examination, and maintenance of circuit breakers; record.

The operator shall maintain a written record of each test, examination, repair or adjustment of all circuit breakers protecting low- and medium-voltage circuits serving three-phase alternating current equipment and such record shall be kept in a book approved by the Secretary.
#### § 910.701 General.

Sections 700.5, 700.11, 700.12, 700.13, 700.14, 700.15 and part 701 of this chapter shall apply to surface coal mining operations in Georgia.
#### REDIGER, Appellant, v. CORD MEYER CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 15, 1905.)

Action by Frank Rediger, as administrator. etc., of Isador Bjernaczki, against the Cord Meyer Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with HOOKER, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT 5.1
Genesys Conferencing


                                  July 22, 2003

Genesys S.A.
{{L'Acropole}} 954-980 Avenue Jean Mermoz
34000 Montpellier, France

Dear Sirs:

         I am the General Counsel of Genesys S.A., a French corporation (the
"Company") and in that capacity am familiar with the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by the Company of an aggregate of 1,000,000
shares of its common stock (the "Shares") issuable upon exercise of stock
options granted under the Amended and Restated Genesys Stock Incentive Plan (the
"Plan").

         In connection with this opinion letter, I have examined the originals
or copies certified or otherwise identified to my satisfaction of the
Registration Statement and such other records, documents, certificates,
agreements, or other instruments and have made such other inquiries, all as I
deemed necessary to enable me to render the opinions expressed below.

         Based on the foregoing, I am of the opinion that the Shares have been
duly and validly authorized for issuance and, when issued will be validly
issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

         I consent to the inclusion of this opinion as part of the Registration
Statement and to the reference to me contained therein. In giving this consent,
I do not admit that I come within the category of persons whose consent is
required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933 or the rule promulgated
thereunder.

                                                  Very truly yours,


                                                  /s/
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  General Counsel
### §20141. Misuse of agency name and initials

(a) In General.—No person (as defined by section 20135(a) of this title) may knowingly use the words "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" or the letters "NASA", or any combination, variation, or colorable imitation of those words or letters either alone or in combination with other words or letters—

(1) as a firm or business name in a manner reasonably calculated to convey the impression that the firm or business has some connection with, endorsement of, or authorization from, the Administration which does not, in fact, exist; or

(2) in connection with any product or service being offered or made available to the public in a manner reasonably calculated to convey the impression that the product or service has the authorization, support, sponsorship, or endorsement of, or the development, use, or manufacture by or on behalf of the Administration which does not, in fact, exist.

(b) Civil Proceeding To Enjoin.—Whenever it appears to the Attorney General that any person is engaged in an act or practice which constitutes or will constitute conduct prohibited by subsection (a), the Attorney General may initiate a civil proceeding in a district court of the United States to enjoin such act or practice.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3348.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20141 | 42 U.S.C. 2459b. | Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §311, formerly §310, as added Pub. L. 98–52, title I, §107, July 15, 1983, 97 Stat. 284; renumbered §311, Pub. L. 106–391, title III, §324(a)(1), Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1599. |

Section
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2530
CLARENCE N. FOXWORTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; JIM ADKINS, Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-97-3096-WMN) Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 27, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence N. Foxworth, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foxworth v. New York Life Ins. , No. CA-97-3096-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Noble and EPA Meeting – Sign-in Sheet

No. Name Organization

1. Amy Hambrick EPA

2. Lisa Thompson EPA

3. Jim Martin Noble Energy

4. Brian Lockard Noble Energy 

5. Brian Taylor Noble Energy

6. Kate Fay Noble Energy

7. Cheryl Vetter EPA

8. Charlene Spells EPA

9. Matthew Witosky EPA

10. Bruce Moore EPA

Participated via Phone

11. Jodi Howard EPA

12. Mark DeFigueiredo EPA 

13. Suzie Waltzer EPA

14. Carey Bylin EPA

15. David Hendricks EC/R Inc.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 15, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1712 Lower Tribunal No. 16-14544

________________ 

### Azran Miami 2, LLC , Appellant,

vs. 

### US Bank Trust, N.A., etc .,

Appellee.

An Appeal from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge. Jacobs Legal PLLC, and Bruce Jacobs, for appellant. Locke Lord LLP, and Steven J. Brotman (West Palm Beach), for appellee.
Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See U.S. Bank Nat. Ass'n v. Paiz, 68 So. 3d 940, 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding: “To entitle a movant to an evidentiary hearing on a motion for relief from judgment, a rule 1.540(b)(3) motion must specify the fraud with particularity and explain why the fraud, if it exists, would entitle the movant to have the judgment set aside. Flemenbaum v. Flemenbaum, 636 So. 2d 579, 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). ‘If a motion does not set forth a basis for relief on its face, then an evidentiary hearing is unnecessary, the time and expense of needless litigation is avoided, and the policy of preserving the finality of judgments is enhanced.’ Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 20 So. 3d 952, 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). The matter alleged must affect the outcome of the case and not merely be ‘de minimis.’ Thus, to obtain a hearing on a rule 1.540(b)(3) motion, the law requires a movant ‘to demonstrate a prima facie case of fraud, not just nibble at the edges of the concept.’ Hembd v. Dauria, 859 So. 2d 1238, 1240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)”) (citations and quotations omitted). See also Rusniaczek v. Tableau Fine Art Grp., Inc., 139 So. 3d 355, 357-58 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (explaining that the “purpose of this specificity requirement is to permit the court ‘to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie showing which would justify relief from judgment,’ and is not merely rehashing matters explored at trial”) (quotation omitted).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lancer Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher D. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|June 28, 2004 |  | /s/CHRISTOPHER D. HUGHESChristopher D. Hughes,
Chief Executive Officer
|------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











I,
Leonard A. Rosenbaum, President and Chief Executive Officer of CVD Equipment
Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 of CVD
Equipment Corporation (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CVD Equipment
Corporation.








Dated:
      March 31, 2010
            /s/   Leonard A.
      RosenbaumLeonard
      A. RosenbaumChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)