alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5568. Income tax deferment

Notwithstanding other statutes, any Federal income tax return of, or the payment of any Federal income tax by, an employee who, at the time the return or payment would otherwise become due, is in a missing status does not become due until the earlier of the following dates:

(1) the fifteenth day of the third month in which he ceased (except because of death or incompetency) being in a missing status, unless before the end of that fifteenth day he is again in a missing status; or

(2) the fifteenth day of the third month after the month in which an executor, administrator, or conservator of the estate of the taxpayer is appointed.

That due date is prescribed subject to the power of the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate to extend the time for filing the return or paying the tax, as in other cases, and to assess and collect the tax as provided by sections 6851, 6861, and 6871 of title 26 in cases in which the assessment or collection is jeopardized and in cases of bankruptcy or receivership.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 494.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 50A U.S.C. 1013. | Mar. 7, 1942, ch. 166, §13, 56 Stat. 146. |
| | | Aug. 8, 1947, ch. 515, §6, 61 Stat. 918.Aug. 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–428, §1(9), 78 Stat. 437. |

Statutes at Large

Aug. 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–428, §1(9), 78 Stat. 437.

Only that portion of the source law which is applicable to civilian officers and employees and their dependents is codified in this section.

The words "in the case of any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1940" are omitted as unnecessary.

The words "an employee" are substituted for "any civilian officer or employee of any department" to conform to the definition in section 5561(2). The words "in a missing status" are substituted for "absent from his duty station under the conditions specified in section 2 of this Act" to conform to the definition in section 5561(5) and in view of the provisions of section 5562 establishing the entitlement of an employee in a missing status to receive pay and allowances or to have them credited to his account. Reference to "title 26" is substituted for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954".

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
### SUBCHAPTER I—PERSONNEL PROVISIONS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report of Sionix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

|                       |  |  |                    |                                                                                                                      
|---------------------- |  |  | ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |                    |                                                                                                                      
|Date: January 13, 2010 |  |  | /s/ DAVID R. WELLS
|                       |  |  |                    | David R. Wells
President, Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000766041
<NAME> CENTRAL SPRINKLER CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          18,801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,688
<INVENTORY>                                     43,319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,520
<PP&E>                                          74,984
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,093
<BONDS>                                         76,807
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,104
<SALES>                                        224,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,930
<CGS>                                          164,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,449)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,845)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,604)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.89)
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 12/31/99
INCOME STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         132,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,879,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (80,655)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,382,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,592,437
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           46,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,252,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,382,976
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               576,895
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               163,145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                41,917
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                250,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                    60,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            190,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                (22,947)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   167,472
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### Stratigraphy of the Silurian outcrop belt on the east side of the Cincinnati Arch in Kentucky, with revisions in the nomenclature

By: Robert C. McDowell

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1151F

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7075

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEON ANDRE RICHARDSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:15-cr-00088-RGD-LRL-1; 

4:17-cv-00085-RGD)

Submitted: January 28, 2019 Decided: February 7, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deon Andre Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Deon Andre Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for 

reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Richardson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# DAILY READING FILE



# JJ m 0 rn rn 

# NEWARK E XAS

Ms. Lisa Jackson Administrator of USEPA USEPA Headquarters 12000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Code: 1101A Washington, DC 20460
RE: ATTENTION DOCKET ID NO. EPA-HQOar-2008-0476 RESOLUTION OPPOSITION WITH REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CALL FOR CONGRESSIONAL INTERVENTION IN THE MATTER OF WISE COUNTY, TEXAS BEING DESIGNATED AS A MEMBER OF DALLAS-FORT WORTH (DFW) AREA NAAQS 2012 EIGHT HOUR OZONE NONATFAINMENT AREA. Dear Director Jackson: On behalf of the Newark City Council, Newark, Wise County, Texas, please accept this letter with attached Newark City Council Resolution No. 274 as official notice of request for re-review and reconsideration of your Conclusion Decision to add Wise County to the DEW Area nonattainment designation.

Matt Newby Mayor Newark City Council Newark, Wise County, Texas
cc: Caryn Dunn Administrative Coordinator Wise County P.O. Box 393 Decatur, TX 76234
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, James P. Regan, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics Research
Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 11, 2003


                                By:   /s/ James P. Regan
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    James P. Regan
                                    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 248 (Monday, December 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84306-84307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28554]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XA745]


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) 
Community Engagement Committee will meet via web conference on January 
12, 2021.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 12, 2021, from 9 
a.m. to 3 p.m., Alaska Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be a web conference. Join online through 
the link at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/1847.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 1007 W 
3rd Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501-2252; telephone: (907) 271-2809. 
Instructions for attending the meeting via video conference are given 
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve MacLean, Council staff; phone: 
(907) 271-2809; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9be8effeedfeb5f6faf8f7fefaf5dbf5f4fafab5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8dbdccddecd86c5c9cbc4cdc9c6e8c6c7c9c986cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>. For technical support 
please contact our admin Council staff, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e100e18131d501f1a1317103e10111f1f50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbd5cbddd6d895dadfd6d2d5fbd5d4dada95dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

    The Community Engagement Committee will meet to review and

[[Page 84307]]

finalize the report for the Council. The report will present a 
prioritized list of recommendations that the Council may consider 
implementing to improve Council engagement with rural and Alaska Native 
communities. The agenda is subject to change, and the latest version 
will be posted at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/1847 prior 
to the meeting, along with meeting materials.

Connection Information

    You can attend the meeting online using a computer, tablet, or 
smart phone; or by phone only. Connection information will be posted 
online at: https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/1847.

Public Comment

    Public comment letters will be accepted and should be submitted 
electronically to https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/1847.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 21, 2020.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-28554 Filed 12-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Harold Glantz, Appellant, v Nicholas Scoppetta, Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 19, 1978, denying petitioner’s application to inspect and copy all papers and documents in the custody of respondent’s department relating to petitioner and dismissing the petition, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the matter remanded to Special Term for reconsideration upon further submissions by the parties and an *in camera*inspection of documents by Special Term if it deems it necessary to a determination of the issues, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner proposed a site for a new amusement park for approval by the Economic Development Administration which in turn requested respondent’s department of investigation to inquire into his background. The department of investigation reported by a letter unfavorable to petitioner’s character and on the basis of this letter further consideration of the proposal was refused. Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law, art 6), petitioner demanded access to the information on which respondent based his letter. In seemingly unvarying custom, respondent refused. Special Term denied the ensuing article 78 petition because the object of petitioner’s inquiry would be to scrutinize investigatory files compiled for law enforcement purposes which were then exempted from disclosure (then Public Officers Law, §88, subd 7, par d, added by L 1974, ch 579, § 3). Article 6 has now been revised (L 1977, ch 933, § 1) and this appeal must be considered on the present expression of the law *(Matter of Demisay, Inc. v Petito,*31 NY2d 896). Files compiled for law enforcement purposes must now meet express criteria to be exempt from disclosure (Public Officers Law, § 87, subd 2, par [e]). The parties should be given an opportunity to expand their papers to claim or resist the applicability of the new criteria. This may be an appropriate situation for an *in camera*inspection to balance the right of a private citizen with the legitimate needs of the respondent *(Church of Scientology of N. Y. v State of New York,*61 AD2d 942, 943). Special Term also denied the petition because granting it "would not give the petitioner the ultimate relief which he is seeking, namely, the approval of development plans”. We observe, however, *717that the broad access to government records granted to petitioner by the Freedom of Information Law is not conditioned on its serving any purpose other than to acquaint him with "the process of governmental decisionmaking" (Public Officers Law, § 84). Concur-Birns, J. P., Fein, Lane, Lynch and Sandler, JJ.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00248-CV

Heather Hagen McConnell, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 05-FL-124, HONORABLE KARIN BONICORO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We will dismiss for want of prosecution because appellant has not filed a brief. The

clerk’s record was filed on April 19, 2005. No reporter’s record has been filed and this Court has

been informed by the court reporter that no arrangement has been made for payment. Appellant’s

brief was due on July 8, 2005. On July 19, this Court informed appellant that her brief was overdue.

This Court cautioned appellant that, unless she filed a motion to extend time to file her brief by July

29, this Court would dismiss her appeal. Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion to extend time

to file a brief. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(b).

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 31, 2005