alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement (No.
333-138903)  on Form S-8 of CVD Equipment  Corporation of our report dated March
24, 2008 relating to our audit of the consolidated  financial  statements which,
appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CVD Equipment  Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 2007.



                                          /s/Moore Stephens, P.C.
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          MOORE STEPHENS, P.C.
                                          Certified Public Accountants


Cranford, New Jersey
March 27, 2008
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Lancer Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-36393 and 33-47998) on Form S-8 of Lancer Corporation of our report dated
February 28, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Lancer
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and related
consolidated financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December
31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Lancer Corporation.


                                                     KPMG LLP

San Antonio, Texas
March 28, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income and the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000766916
<NAME> AMOCO COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              78
<SECURITIES>                                       768
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3683
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7
<INVENTORY>                                        876
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6442
<PP&E>                                           43070
<DEPRECIATION>                                   23798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   30062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5165
<BONDS>                                           2791
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       12505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     30062
<SALES>                                          28490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 32986
<CGS>                                            20970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    20970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6184
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3235
<INCOME-TAX>                                       961
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2274
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2274
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF INCOME, BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,708
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                       413
<INVENTORY>                                      2,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,836
<PP&E>                                         164,979
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,791
<BONDS>                                        111,149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,379
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,804
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,069
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,666
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,666
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06


</TABLE>
# C_2010328EN.01005901.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/59

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — Jacobs v Commission

(Case F-41/05) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Appointment - Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Classification in grade under the new, less favourable rules - Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

2010/C 328/93

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kurt Jacobs (Bruges, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, annulment of the Commission’s decision classifying the applicant, who was placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations, under the less favourable provisions of those regulations (Article 12 of Annex XIII to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials) and, second, an application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 20.8.2005, p. 26. (Case originally registered at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities as Case T-220/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005.)

1

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNASTRAN documentation for flutter analysis of advanced turbopropellersAn existing capability developed to conduct modal flutter analysis of tuned bladed-shrouded discs was modified to facilitate investigation of the subsonic unstalled flutter characteristics of advanced turbopropellers. The modifications pertain to the inclusion of oscillatory modal aerodynamic loads of blades with large (backward and forward) varying sweep.Document ID19840007085Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsElchuri, V.*(Textron Bell Aerospace Co. Buffalo, NY, United States)*Gallo, A. M.*(Textron Bell Aerospace Co. Buffalo, NY, United States)*Skalski, S. C.*(Textron Bell Aerospace Co. Buffalo, NY, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1982Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-167927D2536-941010NAS 1.26:167927Accession Number84N15153Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-22533Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840007085.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements listed on pages 2 and 3 of this Form 10-Q and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001060513
<NAME> PARAGON CORPORATE HOLDINGS INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,523
<SECURITIES>                                    17,637
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,593
<INVENTORY>                                     48,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,290
<PP&E>                                          25,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,165
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,340)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,063
<SALES>                                        188,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,149
<CGS>                                          118,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  187,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,238)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        29
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,267)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1134 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1134

     Expressing support for the designation of April 11, 2024, as 
                        ``Remanufacturing Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2024

 Ms. Stevens submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing support for the designation of April 11, 2024, as 
                        ``Remanufacturing Day''.

Whereas remanufacturing is a comprehensive and rigorous industrial process by 
        which a previously sold, leased, used, worn, remanufactured, or 
        nonfunctional product or part is returned to a like-new, same-as-when-
        new, or better-than-when-new condition, from both a quality and 
        performance perspective, through a controlled, reproducible, and 
        sustainable process;
Whereas a 2012 United States International Trade Commission (ITC) report found 
        that remanufacturers support at least 180,000 full-time jobs in the 
        United States, and the ITC report states that production of 
        remanufactured goods in the United States increased by 15 percent from 
        2009 to 2011 and exports totaled $11,200,000,000 annually;
Whereas remanufacturing has been recognized by leading universities, research 
        institutions, and manufacturers in the United States as good for the 
        environment for its ability to divert end-of-life products from 
        landfills;
Whereas, by encouraging businesses, State agencies, nonprofit organizations, 
        schools, and individuals to celebrate ``Remanufacturing Day'' on April 
        11, 2024, Congress can further promote remanufacturing as 
        environmentally friendly and economically smart; and
Whereas, to focus the attention of the United States on the benefits of 
        remanufacturing, businesses, educational institutions, and nonprofit 
        organizations have joined together to celebrate ``Remanufacturing Day'' 
        and are encouraging their colleagues, friends and families, and their 
        communities to learn more about the benefits of remanufactured products: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of ``Remanufacturing Day''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York v. Stuart Mitchell.

Motion for leave to reargue all prior motions made to this court for leave to appeal as a poor person denied without prejudice, however, to a renewal thereof upon proper papers. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
### §6336. Restoration of transferred leave

(a)(1) The Office of Personnel Management shall establish procedures under which, except as provided in paragraph (2), any transferred leave remaining to the credit of a leave recipient when the medical emergency affecting the leave recipient terminates shall be restored on a prorated basis by transfer to the appropriate accounts of the respective leave donors.

(2) Nothing in paragraph (1) shall require the restoration of leave to a leave donor—

(A) if the amount of leave which would be restored to such donor would be less than 1 hour or any other shorter period of time which the Office may by regulation prescribe;

(B) if such donor retires, dies, or is otherwise separated from service, before the date on which such restoration would otherwise be made; or

(C) if such restoration is not administratively feasible, as determined under regulations prescribed by the Office.

(b) At the election of the leave donor, transferred annual leave restored to such leave donor under subsection (a) may be restored by—

(1) crediting such leave to the leave donor's annual leave account in the then current leave year;

(2) crediting such leave to the leave donor's annual leave account, effective as of the first day of the first leave year beginning after the date of the election; or

(3) donating such leave in whole or part to another leave recipient; if a leave donor elects to donate only part of restored leave to another recipient, the donor may elect to have the remaining leave credited to the donor's annual leave account in accordance with paragraph (1) or (2).

(c) The Office shall prescribe regulations under which this section shall be applied in the case of an employee who is paid other than on the basis of biweekly pay periods.

(d) Restorations of leave under this section shall be carried out in a manner consistent with regulations prescribed to carry out section 6334(c), if applicable.

(Added Pub. L. 100–566, §2(a), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2836.)
#### § 90.210 Status change reports.

If there is a change in the status of a part 90 miner (such as entering a terminated, injured, or ill status, or returning to work), the operator shall report the change in the status of the part 90 miner to the MSHA District Office or to any other MSHA office designated by the District Manager. Status changes shall be reported in writing or by electronic means within 3 working days after the status change has occurred.
1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3242

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the 

Cesar Antonio Cortez-Rocha, * Western District of Arkansas.

*

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: September 7, 2004

Filed: September 15, 2004

___________

Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Cesar Antonio Cortez-Rocha (Cortez) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after

deportation following an aggravated-felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court1

 sentenced him to 77 months imprisonment

and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, Cortez’s counsel has moved to withdraw

under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and has filed a brief in which he

argues that (1) the sentence imposed for Cortez’s 2001 Arkansas conviction for

criminal impersonation should not have been counted in his criminal history score,
-2-

(2) the district court should have departed downward because Cortez’s criminal

history score was overstated, and (3) trial counsel was ineffective.

After careful review, we find that counsel’s arguments lack merit. Cortez has

not shown plain error in the district court’s inclusion of his criminal-impersonation

sentence in his criminal history score: the sentence included 37 days in jail, and

Cortez has not shown that the jail time was imposed for any reason other than the

criminal conviction or for his related contempt of court. See United States v. Evans,

285 F.3d 664, 674 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1196

(2003); U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(c)(1) (sentences for certain offenses, including giving false

information to police officer and contempt of court, and those similar to them, do not

count in criminal history score unless defendant receives at least 1 year probation or

30 days imprisonment, or unless such prior offense is similar to instant offense).

Further, Cortez waived his downward-departure argument by failing to move for

departure in the district court, see United States v. Murphy, 248 F.3d 777, 779-80 (8th

Cir. 2001), and Cortez’s ineffective-assistance claim would be more properly raised

in postconviction proceedings, see United States v. Smith, Nos. 03-2862, 03-3494,

2004 WL 1737335, at *1 (8th Cir. Aug. 4, 2004).

Following our independent review, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we

find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion

to withdraw.

______________________________
§ 150.19 Reconsideration. ( a ) The Court may, in its discretion and on its own motion, enter an order announcing its intent to reconsider its decision or order in any case not later than 30 days after service of such decision or order on appellate defense counsel or on the appellant, if the appellant is not represented by counsel, provided a petition for grant of review or certificate for review has not been filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, or a record of trial for review under Article 67(b) has not been received by that Court. No briefs or arguments shall be received unless the order so directs.
( b ) Provided a petition for grant of review or certificate for review has not been filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, or a record of trial for review under Article 67(b) or writ appeal has not been received by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, the Court may, in its discretion, reconsider its decision or order in any case upon motion filed either: ( 1 ) By appellate defense counsel within 30 days after receipt by counsel, or by the appellant if the appellant is not represented by counsel, of a decision or order, or
( 2 ) By appellate government counsel within 30 days after the decision or order is received by counsel.
( c ) A motion for reconsideration shall briefly and directly state the grounds for reconsideration, including a statement of facts showing jurisdiction in the Court. A reply to the motion for reconsideration will be received by the Court only if filed within 7 days of receipt of a copy of the motion. Oral arguments shall not be heard on a motion for reconsideration unless ordered by the Court. The original of the motion filed with the Court shall indicate the date of receipt of a copy of the same by opposing counsel.
( d ) The time limitations prescribed by this part shall not be extended under the authority of §§ 150.24 or 150.25 beyond the expiration of the time for filing a petition for review or writ appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, except that the time for filing briefs by either party may be extended for good cause.
### §404d–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 404d–1, comprising section 110 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was renumbered section 112 of act July 26, 1947, by Pub. L. 105–107, title III, §303(b), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2252, and transferred to section 404g of this title, which was editorially reclassified as section 3047 of this title.
§ 225.6 Procedures. ( a ) *Commissary Credit/Debit Card User Fee.* ( 1 ) Only patrons of groups newly authorized privileges by this part must pay a user fee when using a credit or debit card to pay for commissary purchases to offset additional costs charged to the U.S. Treasury associated with credit or debit card use.
( 2 ) The user fee will be set as a transaction-based flat rate, calculated within a range of the average annual rates of credit and debit card transaction costs incurred by the Department of Treasury on behalf of DeCA and in compliance with applicable card network rules. One rate will be set for credit and signature debit card transactions, which are processed as credit cards. Another rate will be set for personal identification number debit card transactions. These rates will be reviewed annually and adjustments may be made as necessary to meet the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 1065.
( 3 ) Purchases made with electronic benefit transfer cards (*e.g.,* Women, Infants, and Children or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and the MILITARY STAR card are not subject to this credit/debit card user fee.
( 4 ) No user fee reimbursement will be made on customer return of merchandise.
( 5 ) All credit/debit card user fee amounts collected in commissary stores will be deposited in the General Fund of the Treasury.
( b ) [Reserved]