Draft EIS Appendix J 

Wyoming Sage-grouse Land Use Plan Amendment J-1 

APPENDIX J—GREATER SAGE-GROUSE WILDFIRE 

AND INVASIVE SPECIES HABITAT ASSESSMENT 

J.1 GREATER SAGE-GROUSE WILDLAND FIRE AND INVASIVE 

SPECIES ASSESSMENT

The process that is identified here is a suggestion for a consistent approach in conducting an assessment 

of the Greater Sage-Grouse habitat and wildfire threat at the local planning unit level. Variations to this 

approach may be made based on interdisciplinary team input and other priorities identified in this plan. 

This collaborative analysis is intended to ensure that actions will be beneficial for long-term enhancement 

and protection of Greater Sage-Grouse habitat. 

This four step process will influence the determination of appropriateness and resulting character of 

projects to protect, maintain, and enhance Greater Sage-Grouse habitat. This process will also identify 

“priority,” or “focus,” areas which spatially define priorities within the planning area for purposes of 

wildland fire and invasive species. Subsequent program planning and resource management planning 

should be developed with and incorporate the results of this analysis in coordination with other priorities 

identified in this plan. Initiation and/or completion of project level National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969 (NEPA) for actions stemming from this assessment will increase certainty of implementation and 

effectiveness. 

This same type of process should be developed at the regional level by both the U.S. Forest Service and 

the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that would focus on a prioritized process to: 1) ensure 

completion and assessment updates of the local unit level Wildland Fire and Invasive Species 

Assessments prior to December 2014; and 2) outline a process in which funding is prioritized and 

allocated by need. 

Step 1: Characterization of Greater Sage-Grouse Habitat 

Relationship to the Larger Scale Setting 

• How does the planning unit lie within the context of the Greater Sage-Grouse habitat? 

Location 

• Describe the relationship of Greater Sage-Grouse habitat with the planning unit. 

Analysis Area Setting and Spatial Boundary 

• Brief description of Greater Sage-Grouse habitat, specifically in terms of acreage and the 

selection of the analysis area. 

• Analysis area should be large enough to provide buffers around Greater Sage-Grouse habitat to 

effectively address fire hazard, risk to the habitat, and restoration opportunities. 
Appendix J Draft EIS 

J-2 Wyoming Sage-grouse Land Use Plan Amendment 

Step 2: Issues and Key Questions 

Fire and Fuels Issue 

• In coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), identify where fire is a major 

threat to Greater Sage-Grouse habitat and where fire may help enhance the habitat in the local 

planning area. In a brief paragraph, summarize the issues related to wildland fire. 

Key Questions 

Fire Management 

1. Where are the priority fire management areas (spatially defined polygons) having the highest need 

for preparedness and suppression action? 

2. Where is the greatest wildfire risk, considering trends in fire occurrence, fuel conditions, and 

highly valued Greater Sage-Grouse habitat? 

3. Where will fire suppression resources be most successful to mitigate the risk and protect Greater 

Sage-Grouse habitats? 

4. Where do opportunities exist that could enhance or improve suppression capability in important 

Greater Sage-Grouse habitats? 

a. For example, increased water availability through installation of heli wells or stock tanks. 

b. Decreased response time through pre-positioned resources or remote stations. 

5. Where should wildfire be managed to achieve land use plan (LUP) objectives for improving or 

restoring Greater Sage-Grouse habitat (old decadent sagebrush/juniper encroachment)? 

6. How can fire management be coordinated across jurisdictional boundaries to reduce risk or to 

improve Greater Sage-Grouse habitat? 

Fuels Management 

1. Where are the priority fuel management areas (spatially defined treatment opportunity areas which 

consider fire risk, fuels conditions, and highly valued Greater Sage-Grouse habitat)? 

2. Based on fire risk to important Greater Sage-Grouse habitats, what types of fuels treatments should 

be implemented that will reduce the risk? Where should fuels treatments be prioritized, and what is 

the amount of treatment acres needed for long-term enhancement and protection of Greater SageGrouse habitat? 

3. Based on opportunities for fire to improve/restore Greater Sage-Grouse habitats, what types of 

fuels treatments should be implemented that will increase ability to allow fire? Where should fuels 

treatments be prioritized, and what amount of treatment is needed for long-term enhancement and 

protection of Greater Sage-Grouse habitat? 

4. Are there opportunities to utilize a coordinated approach across jurisdictional boundaries? 

a. Fuel reduction techniques include, but are not limited to: grazing, prescribed fire, chemical, 

biological and mechanical treatments. 

5. Are there areas where fuel treatments help restore Greater Sage-Grouse habitat as well as reduce 

risk? 

Restoration 

1. Are there opportunities for restoration treatments to protect, enhance or maintain Greater SageGrouse habitat? 
Draft EIS Appendix J 

Wyoming Sage-grouse Land Use Plan Amendment J-3 

2. Where will post-fire restoration be most successful? 

Step 3: Current Conditions 

The purpose of this step is to develop information relevant to the issues and key questions identified in 

Step 2. 

Biological Features 

Fire and Fuels 

• Has fire played a role in shaping the vegetation? 

• Description should include dominant cover types, plant associations, and seral stages to identify 

the condition of Greater Sage-Grouse habitat. 

• What has been the impact of fire exclusion (increased conifer encroachment)? 

• What is the current extent of annual grasses, their effect on fire frequency/severity/size, and 

implications for fire suppression? 

• What are the trends related to plant succession and fire regimes? 

Fuels Management 

• Describe current fuels management within the planning area. 

Fire Management 

• Describe fire occurrence trends. 

• Describe suppression capabilities. 

Restoration 

• Describe the spatial depiction of invasive species occurrence. 

Methodology 

• What are the analysis methods to be utilized and analysis assumptions? 

Use of best available Science 

• Describe data sets used, such as the Large Fire Simulator (FSIM) layer, local data, etc. 

• What are the elements of science used? 

Fire Risk 

Step 4: Interpretation and Recommendations 

In this section, consider the analysis in Section 3. Interpret, refine and recommend temporal, spatial, and 

quantifiable outcomes that are prioritized based on need (This can also be correlated to the Vegetation 

Dynamics Development Tool [VDDT] modeling as a comparison and refine the results.). Include broad 

statements related to each question, including how you got to the results. 

• There is a need for XXXX amount of restoration treatments. 

• There is a need for XXXX amount of fuel treatments. 

• There is a need to prioritize XXXX Greater Sage-Grouse habitats for aggressive initial attack that 

were identified at highest risk from losing key habitat components. 
Appendix J Draft EIS 

J-4 Wyoming Sage-grouse Land Use Plan Amendment 

• To enhance initial attack capabilities, there is a need to install XXXX or staff XXXX remote 

station during XXXX timeframe or XXXX conditions. 

Fire Management 

1. Identify priority areas for fire suppression resources to protect Greater Sage-Grouse habitats that 

are at greatest risk. 

• Include spatially defined priority areas, tables, maps, or appropriate information. 

2. Identify opportunities to enhance or improve suppression capability. 

• Include tables, maps, or appropriate information. 

3. Identify areas where wildfires can be managed to achieve LUP objectives. 

• Include tables, maps, or appropriate information. 

Fuels Management 

1. Identify, based on fire risk, fuel conditions and burn probability, fuels treatment priority areas and 

the level of treatment (acres) needed for long-term enhancement and protection of Greater SageGrouse habitat. 

• Include spatially defined priority areas, tables, maps, or appropriate information. 

• Proposed fuels treatments should be delineated by type, such as: 

i. Linear fuel breaks along roads 

ii. Other linear fuel breaks to create anchor points 

iii. Prescribed burning 

iv. Mechanical conifer removal 

v. Other mechanical, biological or chemical treatment 

2. Identify where fuel treatments would increase the ability to use fire to improve/enhance Greater 

Sage-Grouse habitat? 

• Include tables, maps, or appropriate information. 

3. Identify coordination between XXXX and XXXX to facilitate the planning and implementation for 

fuels treatments. 

• Include tables, maps, or appropriate information. 

Restoration 

1. Identify restoration treatments needed to protect, enhance or maintain Greater Sage-Grouse habitat. 

• Include tables, maps, or appropriate information. 

2. Identify locations where post-fire restoration treatments should be focused. 

• Include tables, maps, or appropriate information. 
Draft EIS Appendix J 

Wyoming Sage-grouse Land Use Plan Amendment J-5 

Annual Treatment Needs 

1. Based on the information above and within the planning area, what are the annual needs based on 

the key questions and summary statements? 

Annual Treatment Abilities 

1. Putting Greater Sage-Grouse habitat protection and enhancement into perspective with other high 

valued resources and important land management goals, how does the annual need relate to 

capabilities? 

2. What are the realistic annual expectations in fire management, fuels management, and restoration 

for the next five years?