alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Wilderness Areas

Research Natural Areas

Special Interest Areas

Designated Wild and Scenic Rivers 

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 3-17: Forest Service Special

Designation Areas
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 996 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 329
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 996

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 3, 2023

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                            February 6, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Dr. Rudy 
                         Lombard Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. RUDY LOMBARD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dr. Rudy Lombard Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Rudy 
Lombard Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 329

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 996

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Dr. Rudy 
                         Lombard Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 6, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
### §201. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–125, title VIII, §802(g)(2), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 212

Section, Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §401, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2177, established the Directorate of Border and Transportation Security headed by an Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Handleman Company (the Registrant) that the Annual Report
of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended April 28, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.



|                    |  |                                                
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: July 24, 2012 |  | /s/A.A. KOCH                                   
|                    |  | A.A. KOCH President and Chief Executive Officer



|                    |  |                                                                
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 24, 2012 |  | /s/ROZANNE KOKKO                                               
|                    |  | ROZANNE KOKKO Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

These certifications are not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### § 228.2 Control of activities on protected property.

Persons in and on protected property shall at all times comply with official signs of a prohibitory, regulatory, or directory nature and with the direction of Security Protective Officers and any other duly authorized personnel.
#### § 77.900-1 Testing, examination, and maintenance of circuit breakers; procedures.

Circuit breakers protecting low- and medium-voltage circuits serving portable or mobile three-phase alternating current equipment and their auxiliary devices shall be tested and examined at least once each month by a person qualified as provided in § 77.103. In performing such tests, the circuit breaker auxiliaries or control circuits shall be actuated in any manner which causes the circuit breaker to open. All components of the circuit breaker and its auxiliary devices shall be visually examined and such repairs or adjustments as are indicated by such tests and examinations shall be carried out immediately.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, Group
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Duke Energy Carolinas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Carolinas.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID L. HAUSER                     
|David L. Hauser                            
|Group Executive and Chief Financial Officer
|August 13, 2008
#### § 148.4 Policy documentation.

Agency heads shall ensure that any policy documents their agency issues setting out facilities security policies and procedures incorporate the policy set out herein, and that such policies are reasonable, effective, efficient, and enable and promote interagency reciprocity.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7383
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SAMAD HAASIM ARRINGTON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-94-26, CA-96-69-1-V) Submitted: September 30, 1997 Decided: October 17, 1997 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samad Haasim Arrington, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Arrington , Nos. CR-94-26; CA-96-69-1-V (W.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Ann Magnotti, Respondent, v. Alphonse Magnotti, Appellant.

Tn a proceeding under article 4 (§ 411 *et seq.)*of the Family Court Act, instituted 'by a wife against her husband, the husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond' County, entered December 7, 1962 after trial, which: (1) awarded the wife $70 per week for her support; and (2) awarded her $300 for counsel fees. Order modified on the facts by reducing the amount of support to $00 per week. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. From all of the circumstances it appears that the wife was justified in leaving her husband; that the husband is presently able to afford $60 a week for support; and that the award of $300 for counsel fees was justified. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Ivleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 10(v)**

 

FIRST AMENDMENT 

TO THE 

HANDLEMAN COMPANY 

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 

(United States) 

 

WHEREAS, Handleman Company (the “Company”) has established and maintains the Handleman Company SupplementalExecutive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) for the benefit of selected key executives; and 

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.1 of the SERP, the Company has reserved the right to amend the SERP at any time; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Company is desirous of amending the SERP to insure that benefitsare not lost as a result of a participant’s participation in certain other deferred compensation programs offered by the Company. 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PREMISES, Section 3.2 of the SERP is hereby amended, effective January 1, 1999, to read as follows: 

 

“3.2 Amount. Subject to Section 3.4 hereof, theSERP Retirement Benefit for an Executive, as of any date, shall be an annual amount equal to the product of the Executive’s total years of Credited Service as of such date, not in excess of thirty (30) years, multiplied by one and one-quarterpercent (1.25%) (or such higher percentage as may be designated by the Board as applicable to the Executive, but not to exceed one and one-half percent (1.5%)) of the Executive’s Final Average Compensation, minus his/her Accrued Benefitdetermined as of such date under the Pension Plan, payable at age sixty-five (65) in the form of a single life annuity. For purposes of determining the amount of the SERP retirement benefit under this Section 3.2, the Executive’s Final AverageCompensation shall include any amounts deferred under the Handleman Company Deferred Compensation Plan in any year included in the period for which his/her Final Average Compensation is determined.” 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company hereby adopts this First Amendment to theSERP, effective January 1, 1999, this 3rd day of February, 1999.
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Samex Mining Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey P. Dahl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





“Jeffrey P. Dahl”


Jeffrey P. Dahl


President and Chief Executive Officer


, 2012
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Cyanotech Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 33-63789, 333-42484, 333-141911, 333-141912 and
333-154165 on Form S-8 and 333-42486, 333-97755, and 333-101401 on Form S-3 of Cyanotech Corporation of our
reports dated June 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year ended March 31,
2008, and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Cyanotech Corporation.

/s/
KPMG

Honolulu,
Hawaii
June 24, 2010

---



QuickLinks
Map 2-16: Alternative C

Areas Closed to Mineral Material Disposal

Related to Greater Sage Grouse Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

Closed to Mineral Material Disposal

Federal Salable Mineral Estate

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: Identified restrictions displayed on this map

are in addition to existing restrictions already

approved through previous planning efforts.
EXPERIENCE YOUR AMERICA

TM www.nps.gov/npsa

Local Area Map: Utulei, Fagatogo, and Pago Pago Villages

National Park

Visitor Center

Sadies by the Sea

Governor’s 

Mansion

Utulei Beach

Internet

Bank of 

Hawaii ANZ Bank

Police

IBM 

Laundromat

Lee Auditorium

Museum

Senate

Fono Building

Market

McDonald’s

Sadie 

Thompson Inn

Bus Station

Fagatogo Square

Blunts Point

World War II Cannons

Fale Library

American Samoa Government

Executive Office Building$

$

National Park of American Samoa National Park Service

U.S. Department of the Interior Local Area / Island Map

001

Port Entrance 001

Samoan youth in their traditional clothing

Rainmaker Mountain

World War II cannon at Blunts Point

Ocean Fire Station

Center

LEGEND

Restrooms

$

Bus Stop

First Aid

Information

Lodging

Gas Station

Trailhead

Post Office

Picnic Area

Laundromat

Library

Snack Bar

Beach Access

Police

Telephone

Convenience Store

Souvenir Shop

Bookstore

Bank

Taxi 

––– Trail

Money Transfer

Tutuila Island
Āfono

Bay

Fagasā

(bay)

Tāfeu

Cove Vatia Bay

SOUTH PACIFIC OCEAN

PAGO PAGO

 HARBOR

Mount ‘Alava

1610ft

491m

Āfono Pass

North Pioa Mountain

1718ft

523m

Fagasā

Pass

Hospital

Matafao

2142ft

653m

Rainmaker Mountain

National Natural

Landmark

Fagatele Bay

National Marine

Sanctuary

Vai’ava Strait

National Natural

Landmark

Cape Taputapu

National Natural

Landmark

Le’ala Shoreline

National Natural

Landmark Fogama’a Crater

National Natural

Landmark

Matafao Peak

National Natural

Landmark

‘Aunu’u

National Natural

Landmark

Manofā

Pola Island

420ft

128m

Cape Matātula


AUNU’U

ISLAND

Amalau

Valley

Ridge

Fatu Rock

(Flower Pot Rock)

Maugaloa

Golf

Course

Pago Pago

International Airport

Turtle and Shark Legend site

Hiking trail

Temporarily 

Authorized park area Coral reef Closed

Paved road Unpaved road

North

Star

Mound

site

Faga’alu

A’oloaufou

1340ft

408m

Leone

Vaitogi

Fogāgogo

Fūtiga

Pava’ia’i

Tafuna Nu’uuli

Fagasā

Fagatogo

Pago Pago

Vatia

Utulei

Masefau

Faga’itua

Āmouli

‘Aunu’u

Aūa

Vailoatai

Poloa

‘Āmanave

Fagamalo Fatumafuti

Sa’ilele

Onenoa Tula

‘Au’asi

Ālega

‘Aoa

‘Ili’ili

0.3 mi / 0.5 km

001

001

001

001

001

001

005

006

002

National Park

Visitor Center

11/12 www.nps.gov/npsa

Fruit Bat

Pola Island

Coral Reef

Tutuila Island

Printed on recycled paper with soy-based ink
### §9507. Streamlined demonstration project authority

(a) The exercise of any of the flexibilities under sections 9502 through 9510 shall not affect the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to implement for the Internal Revenue Service a demonstration project subject to chapter 47, as provided in subsection (b).

(b) In applying section 4703 to a demonstration project described in section 4701(a)(4) which involves the Internal Revenue Service—

(1) section 4703(b)(1) shall be deemed to read as follows:

"(1) develop a plan for such project which describes its purpose, the employees to be covered, the project itself, its anticipated outcomes, and the method of evaluating the project;";

(2) section 4703(b)(3) shall not apply;

(3) the 180-day notification period in section 4703(b)(4) shall be deemed to be a notification period of 30 days;

(4) section 4703(b)(6) shall be deemed to read as follows:

"(6) provides each House of Congress with the final version of the plan.";

(5) section 4703(c)(1) shall be deemed to read as follows:

"(1) subchapter V of chapter 63 or subpart G of part III of this title;";

(6) the requirements of paragraphs (1)(A) and (2) of section 4703(d) shall not apply; and

(7) notwithstanding section 4703(d)(1)(B), based on an evaluation as provided in section 4703(h), the Office of Personnel Management and the Secretary of the Treasury, except as otherwise provided by this subsection, may waive the termination date of a demonstration project under section 4703(d).

(c) At least 90 days before waiving the termination date under subsection (b)(7), the Office of Personnel Management shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of its intention to waive the termination date and shall inform in writing both Houses of Congress of its intention.

(Added Pub. L. 105–206, title I, §1201(a), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 715.)
(April 19, 1962)

#### In the Matter of Frank O. Monico, Petitioner, v. Stephen P. Kennedy, as Police Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York, Respondent.

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dismissing petitioner from the Police Department at the end of his probationary period, unanimously confirmed and the petition dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Following a brawl between petitioner and another officer, respondent directed a departmental trial. Adopting the Trial Commissioner’s findings without independent knowledge of the facts or the testimony, respondent issued the order appealed from. While a decision so made is generally improper and not allowed to stand, that is not the case here. The effect of the order is that at the conclusion of the petitioner’s probationary period he was not appointed to the police force. In determining whether or not to appoint a probationary patrolman to the regular force, the respondent Commissioner may rely on reports of his subordinates as to the conduct or character of the probationer and, barring a determination that can be shown to be arbitrary, his conclusion is final *(Matter of Delicati*v. *Schechter,*3 A D 2d 19). There is no requirement that there be a hearing *(Matter of Voll*v. *Helbing,*256 App. Div. 44). The provision of the determination fining the petitioner 10 days’ pay has not been enforced and petitioner has not been aggrieved thereby. The determination is consequently confirmed as a justifiable failure to appoint petitioner rather than as a disciplinary action. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
**Exhibit32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hickory Tech Corporation(HickoryTech) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,David A. Christensen, Chief Financial Officer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.

 

 
| /s/ David A. Christensen                                          |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| David A. Christensen  Chief Financial Officer  March 3, 2005 |

 

----
### §805. Judicial review

No determination, finding, action, or omission under this chapter shall be subject to judicial review.

(Added Pub. L. 104–121, title II, §251, Mar. 29, 1996, 110 Stat. 873.)