alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1656.13 Review of alternative service job assignments. ( a ) Review of ASW job assignments will be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of this subsection.
( b ) Whenever the ASW believes that his job assignment violates his religious, moral or ethical beliefs or convictions as to participation in war that led to his classification as a conscientious objector or is in violation of the provisions of this part he may request a reassignment by the ASOM, as provided for in § 1656.12.
( c ) The ASOM shall reassign the ASW if the ASOM concludes that the ASW's work assignment violates his religious, moral or ethical beliefs or convictions as to participation in war which led to his classification as a CO or is in violation of the provisions of this part.
( d ) If the ASOM does not reassign the ASW, the ASW may, within 15 days after the date of mailing of the decision of the ASOM, request a review of his job assignment by a District Appeal Board.
( e ) It shall be the function of the District Appeal Board to determine whether or not an ASW's job assignment violates the ASW's religious, moral, or ethical beliefs of convictions as to participation in war which led to his classification as a conscientious objector or is in violation of the provisions § 1656.5(a) of this part. In making the former determination, the Review Board must be convinced by the ASW that if the ASW performed the job, his convictions as to participation in war would be violated in a similar way as if the ASW had participated in war.
( f ) The District Appeal Board may affirm the assignment or order the reassignment of the ASW in any matter considered by it.
( g ) Procedures of the District Appeal Board are: ( 1 ) Appeals to the Board shall be in writing, stating as clearly as possible the ground for the appeal.
( 2 ) The ASW may appear before the Board at his request. He may not be represented by counsel or present witnesses. The ASOM or his representative may represent the Selective Service System at the hearing and present evidence.
( 3 ) The Board's determination will be based on all documents in the ASW's file folder and statements made at the hearing.
( 4 ) The decision of the Board will be binding only in the case before it. A decision of a Board will not be relied upon by a Board in any other case.
( 5 ) A decision of the Board is not subject to review within the Selective Service System.
[48 FR 16676, Apr. 19, 1983, as amended at 69 FR 20544, Apr. 16, 2004]
# C_2010301EN.01002001.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/20

---

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission

(Case T-279/04) (1)

1

(Competition - Concentrations - French-language publishing - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets - Action for annulment brought by an unsuccessful prospective purchaser - Obligation to state reasons - Fraud - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89)

2010/C 301/29

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Éditions Odile Jacob SAS (Paris, France) (represented by: O. Fréget, W. van Weert, I. de Seze, M. Struys, M. Potel and L. Eskenazi, lawyers

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially A. Whelan, O. Beynet, A. Bouquet and F. Arbault, then A. Bouquet and O. Beynet, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Lagardère SCA (Paris) (represented by: initially A. Winckler and I. Girgenson, then A. Winckler, F. de Bure and J.-B. Pinçon, lawyers

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2004/422/EC of 7 January 2004 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2978 — Lagardère/Natexis/VUP) (OJ 2004 L 125, p. 54).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Éditions Odile Jacob SAS to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the European Commission and Lagardère SCA. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Éditions Odile Jacob SAS to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the European Commission and Lagardère SCA.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, of 23.10.2004.

1

---
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic 

and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of 

any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go 

to press. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 21-BG-848

IN RE JAN C. SMITH

2020 DDN 219

An Administratively Suspended Member of the 

Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 956375

BEFORE: Beckwith and Deahl, Associate Judges, and Fisher, Senior Judge. 

O R D E R

(FILED— March 3, 2022)

On consideration of the certified copy of an order from the state of Virginia

suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of 

one year and one day; this court’s December 27, 2021, order suspending respondent 

pending resolution of this matter and directing him to show cause why reciprocal 

discipline should not be imposed; and it appearing that respondent has not filed any 

response or his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14(g) affidavit, it is 

ORDERED that Jan C. Smith is hereby suspended from the practice of law in 

the District of Columbia for a period of one year and one day. See In re Sibley, 990 

A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable 

presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies unless one of the exceptions is 

established). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s 

suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully 

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). 

PER CURIAM
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Daniel W. Warren, Beneficiary of the Daniel Steven Weiner

1996 Trust

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00471

- CV

Trial court case number: 425,576

- 401

Trial court: Probate Court No

. 4 of Harris County

It is ORDERED that the relator’s request for an emergency stay pending resolution of the

petition for a writ of mandamus is GRANTED. All proceedings in this cause number in the

probate court are hereby STAYED un til further notice. The real party in interest is ORDERED to

file a response, if any, no later than June 26, 2015.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 27, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 85658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4559-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-4559-DR), dated August 28, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 12, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of August 28, 2020.

    Caddo, La Salle, and St. Landry Parishes for Individual 
Assistance (already designated for emergency protective measures 
[Category B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public 
Assistance program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-28727 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
**EXHIBIT 32**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Double Eagle PetroleumCo. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, each of Stephen H. Hollis, the ChiefExecutive Officer, and David C. Milholm, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: (1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: August 12, 2005 /s/ Stephen H. Hollis   Stephen H. Hollis   Chief Executive Officer                                            /s/ David C. Milholm   David C. Milholm   Chief Financial Officer
1/28/2016

1

SUMMARY OF DRAFT AMBIENT AIR 

MONITORING PROTOCOL FOR 

METHYL BROMIDE IN THE MARITIME 

EXCHANGE REGION FOR THE 

DELAWARE RIVER AND BAY

US EPA GUIDELINE SS-1076

JANUARY 28, 2016

PERSONNEL

Sponsor: Methyl Bromide Industry Panel

Confidential Business Information
1/28/2016

2

PARAMETERS

• Requested by GDCI Dated August 6, 2014

• To be conducted in the Maritime Exchange Region of 

Delaware River and Bay

• Study duration – two consecutive years

• To be conducted in compliance with FIFRA Good 

Laboratory Practices

• Protocol to be approved by EPA prior to study initiation

• Annual reports to EPA

PROPOSED STUDY 

LOCATION

Confidential Business Information
1/28/2016

3

PROPOSED STUDY 

LOCATION - DETAIL

Confidential Business Information

Confidential Business Information
1/28/2016

4

Confidential Business Information Confidential Business Information
1/28/2016

5

Confidential Business Information Confidential Business Information
1/28/2016

6

Confidential Business Information Confidential Business Information
1/28/2016

7

Confidential Business Information Confidential Business Information
1/28/2016

8

Confidential Business Information Confidential Business Information
1/28/2016

9

Confidential Business Information

Confidential Business Information
1/28/2016

10

PROPOSED PROJECT 

SCHEDULE

Tentative project schedule, depending on EPA review and 

approval of Protocol.

Confidential Business Information
#### § 1906.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 1906.150, no qualified individual with handicaps shall, because the Agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with handicaps, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the Agency.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21




                          CENTRAL SPRINKLER CORPORATION

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




                                                                   Names      
                                     Jurisdiction of            Under Which
 Name                                Organization              Doing Business
 -----------------------------       ---------------           -------------- 
 CSC Finance Company                 Delaware                  Corporate Name 
                                                            
 CSC Investment Company              Delaware                  Corporate Name
                                                            
 Central Sprinkler Company           Pennsylvania              Corporate Name
                                                            
 Spraysafe Automatic                                        
   Sprinklers Limited                United Kingdom            Corporate Name
                                                            
 Central Castings Corporation        Alabama                   Corporate Name
                                                            
 Central CPVC Corporation            Alabama                   Corporate Name
                                                            
 Central Sprinkler                                          
   Export Corporation                Barbados                  Corporate Name
EXHIBIT 23(ii)



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Forms S-3 No. 333-15371 as supplemented on July 13, 1998 and February
8, 1999) of Techdyne, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated
March 10, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Techdyne, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999 included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                                        /s/ WISS & COMPANY, LLP



March 29, 2000
Livingston, New Jersey
### §6329d. Parental bereavement leave

(a) Definitions.—In this section—

(1) the terms "employee" and "son or daughter" have the meanings given those terms in section 6381; and

(2) the term "paid leave" means, with respect to an employee, leave without loss of or reduction in—

(A) pay;

(B) leave to which the employee is otherwise entitled under law; or

(C) credit for time or service.

(b) Bereavement Leave.—

(1) In general.—Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), an employee shall be entitled to a total of 2 administrative workweeks of paid leave during any 12-month period because of the death of a son or daughter of the employee.

(2) Limitation.—Leave under paragraph (1) may not be taken by an employee intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule unless the employee and the employing agency of the employee agree otherwise.

(3) Notice.—In any case in which the necessity for leave under this subsection is foreseeable, the employee shall provide the employing agency with such notice as is reasonable and practicable.

(Added Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XI, §1111(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1953.)
#### In the Matter of International Printing Pressmen & Assistants Union of North America, Petitioner, v. H. Muron Lewis et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the State of New York, Respondents.

Motion by Allied Printing Trades Council of Greater New York for permission to file a brief *amicus curia,*granted.
#### § 77.1110 Examination and maintenance of firefighting equipment.

Firefighting equipment shall be continuously maintained in a usable and operative condition. Fire extinguishers shall be examined at least once every 6 months and the date of such examination shall be recorded on a permanent tag attached to the extinguisher.

(Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*))

[36 FR 9364, May 22, 1971, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
Exhibit 99.02


     I, Steven B. Graham, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sbarro, Inc.

     2. Based on my  knowledge,  this Annual  Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this Annual
Report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included  in this Annual  Report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report.


Date:  March 31, 2003

/s/ Steven B. Graham
---------------------------
Steven B. Graham,
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)



A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO SBARRO,  INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY SBARRO,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT NO. 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration
Statement No. 333-08609 of Greene County Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated
January 16, 2004 on the consolidated financial statements of Greene County
Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2003 as included in the registrant's
annual report on Form 10-K.

                                               /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Oak Brook, Illinois
March 8, 2004

                                       1
### §302901. Awarding of grants and availability of grant funds

(a) In General.—No grant may be made under this division unless application for the grant is submitted to the Secretary in accordance with regulations and procedures prescribed by the Secretary.

(b) Grant Not Treated as Taxable Income.—No grant made pursuant to this division shall be treated as taxable income for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).

(c) Availability.—The Secretary shall make funding available to individual States and the National Trust as soon as practicable after execution of a grant agreement. For purposes of administration, grants to individual States and the National Trust each shall be deemed to be one grant and shall be administered by the Service as one grant.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3202.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302901(a) | 16 U.S.C. 470b(a) (1st sentence paragraph (1)). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §102(a) (1st sentence paragraph (1)), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 916; Pub. L. 94–422, title II, §201(1), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1319. |
| 302901(b) | 16 U.S.C. 470b(a) (last sentence). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §102(a) (last sentence), as added Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §202(b), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2993; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095. |
| 302901(c) | 16 U.S.C. 470b(d) (relating to availability). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §102(d) (relating to availability), as added Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4009(3), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4759. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "Notwithstanding any other provision of law" are omitted as unnecessary.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                      GENICOM Corporation and Subsidiaries
      STATEMENT REGARDING THE COMPANY'S COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    -----------------------------
                                                                    DECEMBER 31,       JANUARY 1,
                                                                         1995            1995
                                                                    ------------       ---------
<S>                                                                      <C>              <C>
SHARES USED IN THIS COMPUTATION:                                                   
                                                                                   
Weighted average common shares outstanding                               10,760           10,630
                                                                                   
Shares applicable to stock options, net of shares                                  
  assumed to be purchased from proceeds at                                         
  average market                                                          1,278              715
                                                                    -----------        ---------
TOTAL SHARES FOR EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE                                         
  AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENTS (PRIMARY)                                 12,038           11,345
                                                                                   
Shares applicable to stock options in addition to                                  
  those used in primary computation due to the use                                 
  of period-end market price when higher than                                      
  average                                                                    18               71
                                                                    -----------        ---------
TOTAL FULLY DILUTED SHARES                                               12,056           11,416
                                                                    ===========        =========
</TABLE>


                                      E-36
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600439

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

KAYLA M. HOLLONBECK

Aviation Ordinanceman Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, USS NIMITZ (CVN 68).

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Commander 

James M. Kennedy, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Captain Armando A. Rodriguez-Feo, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 6 April 2017

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, HUTCHISON, and JONES, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court