In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-0604V 

Filed: January 27, 2017

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

AILEEN HARRIS, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages; 

v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder

 * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”)

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Andrew D. Downing, Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for petitioner.

Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On May 23, 2016, Aileen Harris (“petitioner”), filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et 

seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related 

to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination she 

received on November 4, 2015. Pet. at 1; Stip., filed Jan. 27, 2017, at ¶¶ 1, 2, 4. 

Petitioner further states that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that she 

experienced the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there 

has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of her

condition. Pet. at ¶¶ 1, 10, 12; Stip. at ¶¶ 3-5. Respondent denies that petitioner’s 

alleged injuries were caused-in-fact by her flu vaccination, and denies that the vaccine 

caused any other injury or her current condition. Stip. at ¶ 6.

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

Nevertheless, on January 27, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, 

stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned 

finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding 

damages, on the terms set forth therein.

The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation: 

A lump sum of $60,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, 

Aileen Harris. Stip. at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all 

damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id. 

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. 

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of 

the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

 Chief Special Master

 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.