alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 20, 2003.


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 6-K

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                    Cable and Wireless Public Limited Company

                               124 Theobalds Road
                                 London WC1X 8RX
                                     England
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                      Form 20-F...X....  Form 40-F........

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to
the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

                             Yes......  No...X....

         If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):  N/A

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Cable and Wireless Public Limited Company



By: /s/ Kenneth Keith Claydon
    -------------------------------
Name:  Kenneth Keith Claydon
Title: Company Secretary



Date:  June 20, 2003

<PAGE>

Exhibits

1.1   Service Agreement between Cable & Wireless plc and Kevin Loosemore

1.2   Service Agreement between Cable & Wireless plc and David Norman Prince

1.3   Service Agreement between Cable & Wireless plc and Robert O. Rowley

1.4   Service Agreement between Cable & Wireless plc and Adrian Chamberlain

1.5   Service Agreement between Cable & Wireless plc and Francesco Caio
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David J. NobleDavid J. Noble Chairman/Director Principal Executive OfficerMay 10, 2007Date
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wages and Hours in the Glove Industry, 1941

              																	Bunn, Edyth Mae					 and 	Morris, Edward B. 						*Wages and Hours in the Glove Industry, 1941 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 702*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1942,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4204,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### §3362. Promotion; effect of incentive award

An agency, in qualifying and selecting an employee for promotion, shall give due weight to an incentive award under chapter 45 of this title. For the purpose of this section, "agency" and "employee" have the meanings given them by section 4501 of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 426.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 2123(f). | Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1208, §304(f), 68 Stat. 1113. |

Statutes at Large

The word "incentive" is added for clarification. The second sentence is added on authority of former section 2122, which is carried into section 4501.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
#### MURRAY v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1. Imputed Negligence—Fellow Servants.

Even if the negligence of the driver of an ice wagon, with which a street car collides, can be imputed to one riding on the wagon as a helper, he not having interfered in any manner with the driving, the question having been submitted to the jury as a question of fact, their finding in his favor should not be disturbed.

Appeal from City Court of New York, General Term.

Action by Mark Murray against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Henry A. Robinson (Bayard H. Ames and F. Angelo Gaynor, of counsel), for appellant.

John C. Robinson, for respondent.

FREEDMAN, P. J.

The plaintiff recovered for personal injuries sustained in a collision between a car of the defendant and an ice wagon on which he was riding as a helper. He was not driving, nor did he interfere in any manner with the driving. It may be questioned whether, under such circumstances, he can be charged with any negligence on the part of the driver. But even if it were so, the answer to it is that such question was submitted to the jury as one of fact, and that their finding upon this point in favor of the plaintiff should not be disturbed. The questions of defendant’s negligence and of plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence were properly submitted to the jury, and their verdict cannot be held to be against the weight of the evidence. The record discloses no reversible error.

The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### § 263.2 Applicability.

The provisions of this regulation apply to all areas in the Brookmont site and to all persons on or within the site. They supplement those penal provisions of Title 18, U.S. Code, relating to crimes and criminal procedures, which apply without regard to the place of the offense and those provisions of state law which are made federal criminal offenses by virtue of the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. 13.
#### § 200.300 Basis for civil money penalties and assessments.

The DHA may impose a penalty and an assessment against any person who it determines in accordance with this part has violated section 1128B(b) of the Act by unlawfully offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving remuneration to induce or in return for the referral of business paid for, in whole or in part, by TRICARE/CHAMPUS.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1023 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1023

Requiring Members of the House of Representatives to serve one shift in 
a passenger seat of a law enforcement vehicle observing the work day of 
 a local law enforcement officer once during each term as a Member of 
                   the House, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 20, 2024

Ms. Craig submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Requiring Members of the House of Representatives to serve one shift in 
a passenger seat of a law enforcement vehicle observing the work day of 
 a local law enforcement officer once during each term as a Member of 
                   the House, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Ride-Along Resolution''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO 
              PARTICIPATE IN ONE RIDE-ALONG DURING EACH TERM OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Each Member of the House of Representatives shall 
participate in one ride-along in the respective congressional district 
of the Member once during each term as a Member of the House.
    (b) Regulations.--The Committee on House Administration shall 
promulgate regulations to carry out this resolution.
    (c) Violation.--If the Committee on Ethics determines that a Member 
has not satisfied the requirement under subsection (a) by the deadline 
described in such subsection, the Committee shall--
            (1) publish the name of the Member on a readily available, 
        public list on the website of the Committee that identifies 
        Members who have not satisfied such requirement; and
            (2) cause to be published in the Congressional Record 
        information with respect to the failure of the Member to 
        satisfy such requirement.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Ride-along.--The term ``ride-along'' means an 
        arrangement for a Member of the House of Representatives to 
        serve one shift in a passenger seat of a law enforcement 
        vehicle observing the work day of a local law enforcement 
        officer in the respective congressional district of such 
        Member.
            (2) Member of the house of representatives.--The term 
        ``Member of the House of Representatives'' includes a Delegate 
        or Resident Commissioner to the Congress.
    (e) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to the 
One Hundred Eighteenth Congress and each succeeding Congress.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20569 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CAROL DENISE RICHARDSON; ESKICO TRUMAN GARNER Defendants-Appellants
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-323-2
Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Following a jury trial, Defendant-Appellant Carol Denise Richardson was found guilty of one count of conspiring to possess crack cocaine w ith intent to distribute and two counts of possessing crack cocaine with intent to distribute. The district court sentenced her to serve life in prison. Eskico Truman Garner
was found guilty of one count of conspiring to possess crack cocaine with intent todistributeand fivecountsofpossessing crack cocainewith intent todistribute. The district court sentenced him toserve 405 months in prison. Richardson and United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-20569

2 Garner both appeal their sentences. Richardson argues that her life sentence is improper because it was based on facts concerning her prior convictions that
were neither admitted by her nor found by a jury. This argument is foreclosed. See Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545, 565 (2002); Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.466, 490 (2000). Garner argues that the district court erred by determining that he was a leader ofthe offense and by sentencing him in accordancewith thisfinding. The record shows, inter alia, that Garner conducted drug transactions, manufactured crack cocaine, and directed the actions of other individuals who were involved with the offense. The record also shows that at least five people were involved with the offense. In light of these facts, the district court’s determination that Garner was a leader of the offense is plausible. The district court’s imposition of the disputed adjustment thus is not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 204 (5th Cir. 2005); United Statesv. Cooper, 274 F.3d 230, 238 (5th Cir. 2001). Garner’s challenge to the presumption of reasonableness afforded to a sentence that falls within the pertinent guidelines range is foreclosed. See Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007). Richardson and Garner have shown no error. Consequently, the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS              
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999       
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999       
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1999       
<CASH>                            2,061,523       
<SECURITIES>                              0       
<RECEIVABLES>                    18,325,765       
<ALLOWANCES>                     (4,829,393)      
<INVENTORY>                       4,178,680       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 23,748,177       
<PP&E>                           73,811,424       
<DEPRECIATION>                  (29,588,653)      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   81,764,070       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            15,910,374       
<BONDS>                                   0       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0       
<PREFERRED>                               0       
<COMMON>                            449,894       
<OTHER-SE>                       10,813,236       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     81,764,070       
<SALES>                          18,235,255       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 18,235,255       
<CGS>                            15,015,658       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    15,015,658       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,336,328       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  672,371       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     210,898       
<INCOME-TAX>                         83,800       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 127,098       
<DISCONTINUED>                            0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0       
<CHANGES>                                 0       
<NET-INCOME>                        127,098       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.03       
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.03       
                                                  

</TABLE>
| (a)   | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   | The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 1, 2009, which accompanies this certification, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
### §8321. Liability of accountable employees

An accountable employee may not be held responsible for a payment made in violation of this subchapter when the payment made is in due course and without fraud, collusion, or gross negligence.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 564.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 2286. | Sept. 26, 1961, Pub. L. 87–299, §1 "Sec. 7", 75 Stat. 645. |

Statutes at Large

The words "and section 3282 of Title 18" are omitted as unnecessary.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Leanora Homrig, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Cusac Gold Mines Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|By:    | /s/ Leanora Homrig
___________________________   
|------ | -------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Leanora Homrig                                   
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary 
and Treasurer
|Date:  | June 28, 2006                                    





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
### §7112. Determination of appropriate units for labor organization representation

(a) The Authority shall determine the appropriateness of any unit. The Authority shall determine in each case whether, in order to ensure employees the fullest freedom in exercising the rights guaranteed under this chapter, the appropriate unit should be established on an agency, plant, installation, functional, or other basis and shall determine any unit to be an appropriate unit only if the determination will ensure a clear and identifiable community of interest among the employees in the unit and will promote effective dealings with, and efficiency of the operations of the agency involved.

(b) A unit shall not be determined to be appropriate under this section solely on the basis of the extent to which employees in the proposed unit have organized, nor shall a unit be determined to be appropriate if it includes—

(1) except as provided under section 7135(a)(2) of this title, any management official or supervisor;

(2) a confidential employee;

(3) an employee engaged in personnel work in other than a purely clerical capacity;

(4) an employee engaged in administering the provisions of this chapter;

(5) both professional employees and other employees, unless a majority of the professional employees vote for inclusion in the unit;

(6) any employee engaged in intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or security work which directly affects national security; or

(7) any employee primarily engaged in investigation or audit functions relating to the work of individuals employed by an agency whose duties directly affect the internal security of the agency, but only if the functions are undertaken to ensure that the duties are discharged honestly and with integrity.

(c) Any employee who is engaged in administering any provision of law relating to labor-management relations may not be represented by a labor organization—

(1) which represents other individuals to whom such provision applies; or

(2) which is affiliated directly or indirectly with an organization which represents other individuals to whom such provision applies.

(d) Two or more units which are in an agency and for which a labor organization is the exclusive representative may, upon petition by the agency or labor organization, be consolidated with or without an election into a single larger unit if the Authority considers the larger unit to be appropriate. The Authority shall certify the labor organization as the exclusive representative of the new larger unit.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title VII, §701, Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1200; amended Pub. L. 102–378, §2(54), Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1354.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–378 struck out "(1)" after subsec. (a) designation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1101 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Jules Chopak, an Attorney.

— Motion for reinstatement to the Bar denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
§ 223.2 Applicability. This part applies to: ( a ) Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the Department of Defense (hereinafter referred to collectively as the “DoD Components”).
( b ) All SNM, regardless of form, whether in reactor cores or other items under the direct control of the DoD Components (hereinafter referred to as “DoD SNM”).
( c ) Nuclear weapons containing SNM that are in DoD custody (hereinafter referred to as “nuclear weapons in DoD custody”).
( d ) Contractors, consultants, and grantees of the Department of Defense.