alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 800
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54972, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 800 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 800.15 Adjustment of amount. ( a ) The amount of the bond or deposit required and the terms of the acceptance of the applicant's bond shall be adjusted by the regulatory authority from time to time as the area requiring bond coverage is increased or decreased or where the cost of future reclamation changes. The regulatory authority may specify periodic times or set a schedule for reevaluating and adjusting the bond amount to fulfill this requirement.
( b ) The regulatory authority shall— ( 1 ) Notify the permittee, the surety, and any person with a property interest in collateral who has requested notification under § 800.21(f) of any proposed adjustment to the bond amount; and
( 2 ) Provide the permittee an opportunity for an informal conference on the adjustment.
( c ) A permittee may request reduction of the amount of the performance bond upon submission of evidence to the regulatory authority proving that the permittee's method of operation or other circumstances reduces the estimated cost for the regulatory authority to reclaim the bonded area. Bond adjustments which involve undisturbed land or revision of the cost estimate of reclamation are not considered bond release subject to procedures of § 800.40.
( d ) In the event that an approved permit is revised in accordance with subchapter G of this chapter, the regulatory authority shall review the bond for adequacy and, if necessary, shall require adjustment of the bond to conform to the permit as revised.
[48 FR 32959, July 19, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54972, Nov. 17, 2017]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Pension Income Fund XXIII 1996 Year-End 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-K filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000764543
<NAME> CENTURY PENSION INCOME FUND XXIII
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          87,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         41,939
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,392)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,893
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,282
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,681)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (37.66)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1334 

Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is 

in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain 

subpoena. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2024 

Mrs. LUNA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the 

United States, is in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain subpoena. 

Whereas, on February 27, 2024, Merrick Garland, Attorney 

General of the United States, was duly served with a subpoena to produce a narrow and specific set of materials 

possessed by the Department of Justice and related to 

Special Counsel Robert K. Hur’s investigation of President Joe Biden’s ‘‘willful’’ mishandling of classified documents to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House 

of Representatives and the Committee on Oversight and 

Accountability of the House of Representatives in Washington, DC; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1334 IH 

Whereas Attorney General Garland has, in disobedience of 

such subpoena, failed to produce the set of materials; 

and; 

Whereas the set of materials possessed by the Department of 

Justice is material and necessary in order that the House 

of Representatives may properly execute the functions 

imposed on it and may obtain information necessary as 

a basis for such legislative and other action as the House 

of Representatives may deem necessary and proper: Now, 

therefore be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the 

3 United States, is found in contempt of the House of 

4 Representatives for disobeying the February 27, 

5 2024, subpoena; and 

6 (2) Attorney General Garland shall be fined 

7 $10,000 per day until he complies with the sub8 poena. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### §2654. Department of Energy counterintelligence polygraph program

#### (a) New counterintelligence polygraph program required

The Secretary of Energy shall carry out, under regulations prescribed under this section, a new counterintelligence polygraph program for the Department of Energy. The purpose of the new program is to minimize the potential for release or disclosure of classified data, materials, or information.

#### (b) Authorities and limitations

(1) The Secretary shall prescribe regulations for the new counterintelligence polygraph program required by subsection (a) in accordance with the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5 (commonly referred to as the Administrative Procedures Act).

(2) In prescribing regulations for the new program, the Secretary shall take into account the results of the Polygraph Review.

(3) Not later than six months after obtaining the results of the Polygraph Review, the Secretary shall issue a notice of proposed rulemaking for the new program.

(4) In the event of a counterintelligence investigation, the regulations prescribed under paragraph (1) may ensure that the persons subject to the counterintelligence polygraph program required by subsection (a) include any person who is—

(A) a national of the United States (as such term is defined in section 1101 of title 8) and also a national of a foreign state; and

(B) an employee or contractor who requires access to classified information.

#### (c) Omitted

#### (d) Polygraph Review defined

In this section, the term "Polygraph Review" means the review of the Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph of the National Academy of Sciences.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4504, formerly Pub. L. 107–107, div. C, title XXXI, §3152, Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1376; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4504, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(h)(5)(A), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1772; Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(f)(2), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1079; Pub. L. 115–232, div. C, title XXXI, §3112, Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2290.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 4504 of Pub. L. 107–314. Subsec. (c) of section 4504 of Pub. L. 107–314 repealed section 2655 of this title.

Section was formerly classified to section 7383h–1 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 108–136.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 115–232 added par. (4).

2013—Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 113–66 redesignated subsec. (e) as (d) and struck out former subsec. (d) which required submission of a report on further enhancement of personnel security program.

2003—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–136, §3141(h)(5)(A)(iv), made technical amendment. See Codification note above.
### §581. Judicial Review 1

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person adversely affected or aggrieved by an award made in an arbitration proceeding conducted under this subchapter may bring an action for review of such award only pursuant to the provisions of sections 9 through 13 of title 9.

(b) A decision by an agency to use or not to use a dispute resolution proceeding under this subchapter shall be committed to the discretion of the agency and shall not be subject to judicial review, except that arbitration shall be subject to judicial review under section 10(b) 2 of title 9.

(Added Pub. L. 101–552, §4(b), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2744, §591; renumbered §581 and amended Pub. L. 102–354, §3(b)(2), (4), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 944, 945; Pub. L. 104–320, §8(b), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3872.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 10(b) of title 9, referred to in subsec. (b), was redesignated section 10(c) of title 9 by Pub. L. 107–169, §1(4), May 7, 2002, 116 Stat. 132.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 581 was renumbered section 571 of this title.

Another prior section 581 was renumbered section 561 of this title.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–320, which directed that section 581(d) of this title be amended by striking "(1)" after "(b)" and by striking par. (2), was executed to subsec. (b) of this section to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows: "A decision by the head of an agency under section 580 to terminate an arbitration proceeding or vacate an arbitral award shall be committed to the discretion of the agency and shall not be subject to judicial review."

1992—Pub. L. 102–354, §3(b)(2), renumbered section 591 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 102–354, §3(b)(4), substituted "section 580" for "section 590".

1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.

2 See References in Text note below.
#### Luther J. Hall, appellee, v. Edward F. Campbell, administrator of the estate of Horace Barnett, deceased, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,733.

Suit on promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of DeWitt county; the Hon. George A. Sentel, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 11, 1925.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Herrick & Herrick, for appellant.

F. K. Lemon and L. O. Williams, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
# C_2011252EN.01004701.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 June 2011 — de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission

(Case F-17/05 REV)

(Civil service - Application for revision of a judgment - No new facts - Application inadmissible)

2011/C 252/98

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: José Antonio de Brito Sequeira Carvalho (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Kanyonga Mulumba and M. Boury, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action by the applicant for revision of a judgment delivered by the Third Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal on 13 December 2006 in Case F-17/05

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the application as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders Mr. de Brito Sequeira Carvalho to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr. de Brito Sequeira Carvalho to pay all the costs.

---
July 1, 2015

Mr. Cody Perry

P.O. Box 774000 PMB 216

Steamboat Springs, CO 80477

Dear Mr. Perry :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request , posted to the public docket on Ap ril 27, 2015, into the

public docket (No. FAA− 20 15

− 1216 ), but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires yo u to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any que stions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Aircraft and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
§ 1636.10 Statement of reasons for denial. ( a ) Denial of a conscientious objector claim by a board must be accompanied by a statement specifying the reason(s) for such denial as prescribed in §§ 1633.9, 1651.4 and 1653.3 of this chapter. The reason(s) must, in turn, be supported by evidence in the registrant's file.
( b ) If a board's denial is based on statements by the registrant or on a determination that the claim is inconsistent or insincere, this should be fully explained in the statement of reasons accompanying the denial.
| (a)   | The              Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 29, 2007,              which              accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements              of              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;              and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   | The              information contained the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter              ended April 30, 2006, which accompanies this certification, fairly              presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results              of              operation of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

*/s./*
CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE



  
 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 
  
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-61638 of Enodis plc on Form S-8 of our report dated November 20, 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the
differences between accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the effect that the application of the latter would have on the determination of
profit/(loss) attributable to shareholders and the determination of equity shareholders’ funds, and relating to convenience translations for the translation of pounds sterling amounts into U.S. dollar amounts presented solely for the
convenience of readers in the United States of America), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Enodis plc for the year ended September 28, 2002. 
  
 /s/ Deloitte & Touche 
  
 London, England 
 December 10, 2002
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Injuries and Accident Causes in the Foundry Industry, 1942

              																	McCormack, George R. (George Robertson)					,	McElroy, Frank S. (Frank Shafer)					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Injuries and Accident Causes in the Foundry Industry, 1942 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 805*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4275,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER










18 U.S.C.
Certification of Donny R. Johnson


Chief
Financial Officer of


Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries, a Kansas corporation (the “Company”), for the
quarter ended May 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the
Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:




(a)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and;




(b)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.  and Subsidiaries and will be retained by
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  June
11, 2009




By:    /s/
Donny R. Johnson


Donny R.
Johnson


Executive
Vice President-Chief Financial Officer
§ 238.5 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs (ATSD(PA)) will serve as the sole authority for approving DoD assistance, including DoD involvement in marketing and publicity, to non-Government entertainment-oriented media. The ATSD(PA) will make DoD commitments, in consultation with the Heads of the Military Components, only after: ( 1 ) The script, treatment, or narrative description is found to qualify in accordance with the general principles in § 238.4(a).
( 2 ) The support requested is determined to be feasible.
( 3 ) For episodic television, motion pictures, and other nondocumentary entertainment media productions, the producer has an acceptable public exhibition agreement with a recognized exhibition entity (*i.e.,* studio or network), and the capability to complete the production (*i.e.,* completion bond or other industry-recognized guarantor of completion, such as the commitment of a major studio or other source of financial commitment). For documentaries, the producer has indicated a clear capability to complete the production.
( b ) The Heads of the Military Components will develop procedures for implementing this part and will ensure that the requirements of this part are met.
PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-F

EF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PLATE 7
ZUSGS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MT ene at eco eona en ar she
EXPLANATION 89°

© ESTIMATED BLOCK-AVERAGED HEAD—
Based on measurements from four or more
wells per block

—300— LINE OF EQUAL SIMULATED FRESHWATER
HYDRAULIC HEAD—Interval, in feet, is
variable. Datum is sea level

eermees DEPTH-AVERAGED DISSOLVED-SOLIDS
CONCENTRATION—Equal to 10,000
milligrams per liter

~—-—-— DEPTH-AVERAGED DISSOLVED-SOLIDS

CONCENTRATION—Equal to 35,000

milligrams per liter =

Model boundary

32°—/."

Study area boundary —_[

100°

Edge of Continental Shelf
277

i) 50 100 150 MILES

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
Scale 1:2,500,000 ti) 50 100 = 150 KILOMETERS

PLATE 7A. Estimated block-averaged and simulated 1982 freshwater hydraulic head:
Layer 11, permeable zone A and Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer.
B
Alex K. Williamson and Hayes F. Grubb
2001