alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DRS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     2,920,000
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             71,525,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                               1,235,000
<INVENTORY>                                               70,773,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         147,670,000
<PP&E>                                                    76,882,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                            46,036,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           315,498,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    126,232,000
<BONDS>                                                  104,600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                      97,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                77,499,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             315,498,000
<SALES>                                                  105,664,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         105,664,000
<CGS>                                                     98,318,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             98,318,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         3,426,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            3,057,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                               1,284,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        1,773,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               1,773,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.18



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification PursuantTo 18 U.S.C. 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CyanotechCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, William R. Maris, Vice President—Finance and Administrationof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

2)               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  |   | June 26, 2006 |   | /s/ William R.  Maris      |
|--------|--------|--------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|   |   |               |   | William R. Maris           |
|   |   |               |   | *Chief Financial  Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection
with the Annual Report of Lancer Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L. Freitas,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  (1)           The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and  (2)           The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.   June 28,
  2004
  /s/ MARK L.
  FREITASMark L.
  Freitas,Chief
  Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

Lancer Corporation

San Antonio, Texas

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-8 (No. 333-36393, 333-47998 and 333-12351) of Lancer Corporation ofour report dated February 7, 2004, relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 
|   | /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP |   |
|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   | BDO SEIDMAN, LLP     |

 

 

Dallas, Texas

March 18, 2005

 

----
§ 1665.9 SSS Compliance with the Social Security Fraud Prevention Act of 2017 to limit the use of Social Security numbers on documents mailed by the Selective Service System (SSS). ( a ) A document that SSS sends by mail shall not include the Social Security number (SSN) of an individual, except where the Director of Selective Service (or other Agency official whom the Director of Selective Service may designate) determines that it is necessary. If so, the SSN must be truncated to the extent feasible, as follows— ( 1 ) The document shall include no more than the last four digits of the SSN; or
( 2 ) If the document needs to include more digits, then only where they are: ( i ) Required by law (including, but not limited to, a statute, court order, or other legal mandate);
( ii ) Needed to identify a specific individual when no adequate substitute is available; or
( iii ) Needed to fulfill some other compelling SSS business need.
( b ) No portion of an SSN may be visible on the outside of any SSS mailing.
( c ) For purposes of this section, “mail” and “mailing” means printed documents or correspondence, and does not include emails or any other documents, correspondence, or communications in electronic form.
( d ) The requirements of this section shall apply to mail sent by SSS, including mailings by a contractor on SSS's behalf, on or after November 13, 2023.
[88 FR 78641, Nov. 16, 2023]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GPS Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to GPS Industries, Inc. and
will be retained by GPS Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




                                       /s/ ROBERT C. SILZER, SR.
Date:  November 15, 2004          By:  ___________________________
                                       Robert C. Silzer, Sr.
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Duly Authorized Officer)
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ducommun Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), we, Anthony J. Reardon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joseph P. Bellino, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    Anthony J. ReardonAnthony J. ReardonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/    Joseph P. BellinoJoseph P. BellinoVice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:
November 1, 2010

The foregoing certification is accompanying the Form 10-Q solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 840.14 Availability of records. ( a ) Each State regulatory authority shall make available to the Director, upon request, copies of all documents relating to applications for and approvals of existing, new, or revised coal exploration approvals or surface coal mining and reclamation operations permits and all documents relating to inspection and enforcement actions.
( b ) Copies of all records, reports, inspection materials, or information obtained by the regulatory authority shall be made immediately available to the public in the area of mining until at least five years after expiration of the period during which the subject operation is active or is covered by any portion of a reclamation bond so that they are conveniently available to residents of that area, except— ( 1 ) As otherwise provided by Federal law; and
( 2 ) For information not required to be made available under §§ 772.15 and 773.6(d) of this chapter or paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) The State regulatory authority shall ensure compliance with paragraph (b) by either: ( 1 ) Making copies of all records, reports, inspection materials, and other subject information available for public inspection at a Federal, State or local government office in the county where the mining is occurring or proposed to occur; or,
( 2 ) At the regulatory authority's option and expense, providing copies of subject information promptly by mail at the request of any resident of the area where the mining is occurring or is proposed to occur, *Provided,* That the regulatory authority shall maintain for public inspection, at a Federal, State or local government office in the county where the mining is occurring or proposed to occur, a description of the information available for mailing and the procedure for obtaining such information.
( d ) In order to protect preparation for hearings and enforcement proceedings, the Director and the State regulatory authority may enter into agreements regarding procedures for the special handling of investigative and enforcement reports and other such materials.
(Pub. L. 95-87, 30 U.S.C. 1201 *et seq.*)
[47 FR 35633, Aug. 16, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 44781, Sept. 30, 1983; 65 FR 79670, Dec. 19, 2000]
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHRISTOPHER PERKINS NO. 

### 2023 KW 0352


### JULY 5, 

### 2023

In Re: Christopher Perkins, applying for 

### supervisory writs,



### 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 

### 703-176.
BEFORE: LANIER, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.



### WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. 

### Relator failed to include 

## thedistrictcourt's ruling, the courtminutes fromthe February 16, 

### 2023 

## hearing, the State's response, 

### if any, the 

### bill of 

### information, the uniform commitment order, and 

### any other portions of the 

### district court' s record that might support the claims raised 

### in the writ application. 

### Therefore, this court cannot 

### adequately review the 

### ruling at 

### issue herein. Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application 

### for rehearing will not 

### be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 

### 2-18.7 & 4- 

### 9. In the event 

### relator elects to file a new application with this court, 

## hemay do so without the 

### necessity of 

### obtaining a return date. 

## Any future 

## filing on this 

### issue should 

### include the entire contents of this application, 

## the missing items noted above, and a 

### copy 

## ofthis ruling. WIL CHH SMM



### COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

### N

# LDEPUTY CLERKOF COURT 

### Q FOR THE COURT
§ 239.8 Funding. ( a ) *Revolving fund account.* The revolving fund account contains money appropriated in accordance with the ARRA, and receipts from the management, rental, or sale of the properties acquired.
( b ) *Appropriation, receipts, and allocation.* Funds required for administration of the program will be made available by DoD to the HQUSACE. Funds provided will be used for purchase or reimbursement as provided herein and to defray expenses connected with the acquisition, management, and disposal of acquired properties, including payment of mortgages or other indebtedness, as well as the cost of staff services, contract services, Title Insurance, and other indemnities.
( c ) *Obligation of funds.* For government acquisition of homes under the authority of this Rule, funds will be committed prior to the Government's offer to purchase is conveyed to the applicant. The obligation will occur upon timely receipt of the accepted offer returned by the applicant.
§ 1801.12 Requirements as to form. ( a ) *In general.* No particular form is required. All requests must contain the identification information required at § 1801.13.
( b ) *For access.* For requests seeking access, a requester should, to the extent possible, describe the nature of the record sought and the record system(s) in which it is thought to be included. Requesters may find assistance from information described in the Privacy Act Issuances Compilation which is published biennially by the Federal Register. In lieu of this, a requester may simply describe why and under what circumstances it is believed that NACIC maintains responsive records; NACIC will undertake the appropriate searches.
( c ) *For amendment.* For requests seeking amendment, a requester should identify the particular record or portion subject to the request, state a justification for such amendment, and provide the desired amending language.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

WI L BERT L EE HAWKI NS, Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

. § § § § § § No. 08-10-00029- CR

Appea l from 252nd District Court of Jeffer son County , Texas (TC # 08-04659)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Wil bert L ee H awkins appe als his conviction of eva ding a rre st. W e af

firm. Appellant enter ed a neg otiated plea of g uilty and the trial co u rt place d him on defe rre d adjudication community supervisio n fo r five y ear s. The State subsequently filed a motion to adjudicate g uilt based on alleg ations Appellant had violated the terms and conditions of community supervision. Appellant enter ed a plea of true to the alleg ation that he committed ag g rava ted robber y since being place d on community supervision. The trial co u rt revoke d Appellant’s community supervision, adjudicate d him g uilty of evading arr est, and assessed his punishment at confine ment in the state jail for two y ear s. Appellant’s court-a

ppointed counsel has fi led a brief in which he has conclude d that the
appea l is wholly frivolous and wi t h o u t m erit. The brief meets the require ments of Anders v. Calif ornia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct

. 1396, 18 L .Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct

. 2094,
18 L .Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by prese nting a profe ssional evalua tion of the rec ord demonstrating why , in eff ect, there are no arg uable g rounds to be advanc ed. See High v. S t ate, 573 S.W .2d 807(Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. Stat e, 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jack son v. S t a te , 485 S.W .2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969).
A copy of counsel’s brief has been deli v er ed to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his rig ht to ex amine the a

ppellate r ecor d and file a pro se brief. N o pro se brief ha s been f iled.
We have car efully revie wed the rec ord and counsel’s brief, and ag ree that the appea l is wholl y frivolous and without merit. Fur ther, we find nothing in the rec ord that might arg uably support the appe al. The judg ment is affirme d.
Aug ust 18, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

. (Do Not Publish)
### §308104. Battlefield interpretation modernization grant program

(a) Establishment.—The Secretary shall establish a battlefield interpretation modernization grant program under which the Secretary may provide competitive grants to States, Tribes, local governments, and nonprofit organizations for projects and programs that deploy technology to modernize battlefield interpretation and education.

(b) Eligible Sites.—The Secretary may make grants under this section for Revolutionary War, War of 1812, and Civil War battlefield sites eligible for assistance under the battlefield acquisition grant program established under section 308103(b).

(c) Federal Share.—The Federal share of the cost of a project or program funded through a grant provided under the program established under subsection (a) shall be not more than 50 percent of the total cost of the applicable project or program.

(d) Authorization of Appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to provide grants under this section $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2028.

(Added Pub. L. 116–94, div. P, title VII, §703(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3195.)
Director Compensation Summary



 Exhibit 10.18 
  
 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY 
  

Our directors who are not employed by USA Risk Group (Bermuda), Ltd., the management company, receive an annual retainer of $15,000. They are also paid
$700 per half day for each board meeting and $175 per hour for each committee meeting attended during the calendar year. All of our officer positions are filled by directors without any salary or other compensation. Directors are entitled to receive
reimbursement for expenses incurred in attending board or committee meetings or when otherwise acting on our behalf. The chairman of the board, as well as the chairman of each committee, receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000.
EX-10.7
                            PATENT APPLICATION

(b)  United States Patent Application No. 10/845,858

George S. Avery, May 14, 2004

Abstract

A golf mat includes artificial grass fibers attached to and extending
upward from a backing material, which may be one or more layers.  The
artificial grass fibers include groups of at least two different kinds
of fiber sewn through a common path in the backing material.  One of
the kinds of fibers in each group is shaped so as to appear like a
blade of grass.  The other kind of fiber in each group is pre-
stressed/crimped so that the relaxed shape of the fiber is non-linear.
resembling a curlicued or articulated form having lateral excursions.
The latera1 excursions cause portions of one such pre-stressed fiber
to overlap and interfere with another, forming a mesh.  The height of
the pre-stressed fibers in their relaxed state in the turf is less
than the height of the relatively unstressed artificial grass
fiber(s). The crimped fibers form a resilient mat with impact
characteristics similar to natural turf.
### SUBCHAPTER IX—NATIONAL HOMELAND SECURITY COUNCIL
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex Parte Nii-Otabil Nelson

Appellate case number: 01-17-00152-CR

Trial court case number: 1372073-B

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

This Court’s May 25, 2017 Order had directed appellant’s counsel, Alphonsus O. 

Ezeoke, to file a motion for rehearing addressing this Court’s March 28, 2017 Memo 

Opinion dismissing this appeal for want of jurisdiction, along with a second motion for 

an extension of time, within ten days of that Order or else appellant’s “Opening Brief” 

would be stricken as non-compliant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a); cf. id. 42.3(c). 

Appellant has failed to timely respond.

Accordingly, the Court sua sponte STRIKES appellant’s “Opening Brief” because 

he failed to timely comply with this Court’s Order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a), 42.3(c). 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to mark appellant’s brief, received on May 19, 2017, 

as stricken.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

  Acting individually 

Date: June 13, 2017
# C_2011347EN.01004403.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/44

---

Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Ciga and Others v Commission

(Case T-255/00) (1)

1

2011/C 347/79

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 9.12.2000.

1

---
#### § 191.10 Effective date.

This part is effective May 21, 1987.
### §1205. Hazardous materials security inspections and study

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Transportation shall consult with the Secretary to limit, to the extent practicable, duplicative reviews of the hazardous materials security plans required under part 172, title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.

#### (b) Transportation costs study

Within 1 year after August 3, 2007, the Secretary of Transportation, in conjunction with the Secretary, shall study to what extent the insurance, security, and safety costs borne by railroad carriers, motor carriers, pipeline carriers, air carriers, and maritime carriers associated with the transportation of hazardous materials are reflected in the rates paid by offerors of such commodities as compared to the costs and rates, respectively, for the transportation of nonhazardous materials.

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1555, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 475.)
### Subdivision 3—Administered by Other Than National Park Service