alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 401—AERONAUTICS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
40101.
Definition of institution of higher education.
40102.
Governmental interest in aeronautics research and development.
40103.
Cooperation with other agencies on aeronautics activities.
40104.
Cooperation among Mission Directorates.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—HIGH PRIORITY AERONAUTICS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS

40111.
Fundamental research program.
40112.
Research and technology programs.
40113.
Airspace systems research.
40114.
Aviation safety and security research.
40115.
Aviation weather research.
40116.
University-based Centers for Research on Aviation Training.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—SCHOLARSHIPS

40131.
Aeronautics scholarships.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—DATA REQUESTS

40141.
Aviation data requests.
### §§586 to 593. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 586, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 115, prescribed persons who may convene general courts-martial. See section 822 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 587, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 115, prescribed persons who may convene special courts-martial. See section 823 of Title 10.

Section 588, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 116, prescribed persons who may convene summary courts-martial. See section 824 of Title 10.

Section 589, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 116, related to persons who may serve on courts-martial. See section 825 of Title 10.

Section 590, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 117, provided for law officer of a general court-martial. See section 826 of Title 10.

Section 591, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 117, related to appointment of trial counsel and defense counsel. See section 827 of Title 10.

Section 592, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 117, provided for appointment of reporters and interpreters. See section 828 of Title 10.

Section 593, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 117, related to absent and additional members of courts-martial. See section 829 of Title 10.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1957, see act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53 footnote, 70A Stat. 680.
### §1131. Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter, the following terms apply:

#### (1) Appropriate congressional committees

The term "appropriate congressional committees" means the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

#### (2) Department

The term "Department" means the Department of Homeland Security.

#### (3) Disadvantaged businesses concerns

The term "disadvantaged business concerns" means small businesses that are owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals as defined in section 1 124, title 13, Code of Federal Regulations.

#### (4) Frontline employee

The term "frontline employee" means an employee of a public transportation agency who is a transit vehicle driver or operator, dispatcher, maintenance and maintenance support employee, station attendant, customer service employee, security employee, or transit police, or any other employee who has direct contact with riders on a regular basis, and any other employee of a public transportation agency that the Secretary determines should receive security training under section 1137 of this title.

#### (5) Public transportation agency

The term "public transportation agency" means a publicly owned operator of public transportation eligible to receive Federal assistance under chapter 53 of title 49.

#### (6) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XIV, §1402, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 400.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

For short title of this subchapter as the "National Transit Systems Security Act of 2007", see section 1401 of Pub. L. 110–53, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "part".
§ 47.81 Provisions for withholding trade secrets. ( a ) Operators may withhold the identity of a trade secret chemical, including the name and other specific identification, from the written list of hazardous chemicals, the label, and the MSDS, provided that the operator— ( 1 ) Can support the claim that the chemical's identity is a trade secret,
( 2 ) Identifies the chemical in a way that it can be referred to without disclosing the secret,
( 3 ) Indicates in the MSDS that the chemical's identity is withheld as a trade secret, and
( 4 ) Discloses in the MSDS information on the properties and effects of the hazardous chemical.
( b ) The operator must make the chemical's identity available to miners, designated representatives, and health professionals in accordance with the provisions of this subpart.
( c ) This subpart does not require the operator to disclose process or percentage of mixture information, which is a trade secret, under any circumstances.
#### § 912.779 Surface mining permit applications—minimum requirements for information on environmental resources.

Part 779 of this chapter, *Surface Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Information on Environmental Resources,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
#### Bhanu Desai, Petitioner, v Joseph Cimono, Individually and as Commissioner of the Westchester County Medical Center, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner-Medical Director of the Westchester County Medical Center, dated August 10, 1977, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and dismissed him from his position. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. In view of the evidence adduced against the petitioner, the punishment was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see *Matter of Ebner v Board of Educ.,*42 NY2d 938, revg 51 AD2d 799; *Matter of Ahsaf v Nyquist,*37 NY2d 182). We have considered the other issue raised by petitioner and find it to be without merit. Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O'Connor, JJ., concur.
North Dakota Regional Haze Proposed Rule

Copyright List for Administrative Record 225; BACT Enclosures

– NonCBI; Enclosure 13

– Hartenstein

Report Attachments (Non CBI); Attachment to HH Report

Number Copyright

1 Bubbling Fluidized Bed or Stoker

– Which is the Right Choice for Your Renewable Energy

Project? Technical Paper; J.P. DeFusco, P.A. McKenzie, M.D. Fick; The Babcock & Wilcox

Company; 2007

2 B&W for Biomass Proven Technologies to Utilize Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source;

Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc.; 2008

3 Babcock Power Inc.; R. Abrams; 2009 NOx

‐ Combustion/PCUG Conference Presentation

4 Coal

‐ Fired SCR Operating Experience with High Removal Efficiency and Low

‐ NOx Firing

Systems; Technical Publication; C. Erickson, E. Pear, Riley Power Inc., a Subsidiary of Babcock

Power Inc.; S. Straight, LG&E Energy Corp.; L. Hutcheson, Duke Energy; Riley Power Inc., LG&E

Energy Corp., Duke Energy 2003

5 Deactivation of V 2 O 5 ‐ WO 3 ‐ TiO 2 SCR Catalyst at Biomass Fired Power Plants: Elucidation of

Mechanisms by Lab

‐ and Pilot

‐ Scale Experiments; Y. Zheng, A.D. Jensen; J.E. Johnsson;

J.R.Th Ø gersen; p. 186

‐ 194; Volume 83; Applied Catalysis B: Environmental; 2008 Elsevier B.V.

6 Combating Particulate Emissions in Energy Generation and Industry; M. Ohlstr Ü m, J.

Jokiniemi; J. Hokkinen; P. Makkonen; J. Tissari; Tekes 2006

7 The NOxOUT CASCADE process is a multistage system, employing both urea

‐ based Selective

Non

‐ Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and a small Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) component;

Fuel Tech, Inc. 2005

8 NOxOUT SCR, is a cost

‐ effective, safer and simpler alternative to NH 3 SCR for industrial

generators; Fuel Tech, Inc. 1999

9 Alkali deactivation of high

‐ dust SCR catalysts used for NOx reduction exposed to flue gas from

100 MW

‐ scale biofuel and peat fired boilers: Influence of flue gas composition; Å. Kling et al.;

p. 240

‐ 251, Volume: 69; Applied Catalysis B:Environmental; 2006 Elsevier B.V.

10 Electrostatic Precipitator Collection Efficiency and Trace Element Emissions from Co

‐

Combustion Biomass and Recovered Fuel in Fluidized

‐ Bed Combustion; T. Lind et al.; p. 2842

‐

2846, V. 37, Environmental Science & Technology; American Chemical Society 2003

11 Impacts of Texas Lignite Coal on SCR Catalyst Life and Performance: Field Data From TXU’s

Martin Lake Plant: Post

‐ Combustion NOx Control Program; Electric Power Research Institute

(EPRI), Inc., 2003

12 Impacts of Texas Lignite Coal on SCR Catalyst Life and Performance: Field Data From TXU’s

Martin Lake Plant: Technical Report; Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Inc., 2003

Number CBI

1 Impact of biomass co

‐ combustion on SCR DeNOx operation; H. Jensen

‐ Holm, J.R. Th Ø gersen,

P. Lindenhoff; Haldor Tops Ø e A/S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             233
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,809
<PP&E>                                          54,257
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           891
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,602
<SALES>                                          6,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,790
<CGS>                                            4,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    943
<INCOME-TAX>                                       387
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                556
<DISCONTINUED>                                     171
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       727
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
132 STAT. 328 PUBLIC LAW 115–128—FEB. 22, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1438 (H.R. 3058): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–534 (Comm. on Natural Resources) accompanying 

H.R. 3058. 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Feb. 5, 7, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–128 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To redesignate the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial in the State of Missouri 

as the ‘‘Gateway Arch National Park’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gateway Arch National Park 

Designation Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF GATEWAY ARCH NATIONAL PARK. 

(a) REDESIGNATION.—The Jefferson National Expansion Memorial established under the Act of May 17, 1954 (16 U.S.C. 450jj 

et seq.), shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Gateway Arch 

National Park’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Gateway Arch National Park’’. 

Approved February 22, 2018. 

16 USC 450jj–10. 

Gateway Arch 

National Park 

Designation Act. 

16 USC 450jj 

note. 

Feb. 22, 2018 

[S. 1438]
### SUBCHAPTER I—COMMISSIONS, OATHS, AND RECORDS
#### § 1804.2 Definitions.

For purposes of this part, the following terms have the meanings indicated:

*NACIC* means the United States National Counterintelligence Center acting through the NACIC Information and Privacy Coordinator;

*Days* means calendar days when NACIC is operating and specifically excludes Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays. Three (3) days may be added to any requirement of this part if responding by U.S. domestic mail; ten (10) days may be added if responding by international mail;

*Control* means ownership or the authority of NACIC pursuant to federal statute or privilege to regulate official or public access to records;

*Coordinator* means the NACIC Information and Privacy Coordinator who serves as the NACIC manager of the historical access program established pursuant to Section 4.5 of this Order;

*Federal agency* means any executive department, military department, or other establishment or entity included in the definition of agency in 5 U.S.C. 552(f);

*Former Presidential appointee* means any person who has previously occupied a policy-making position in the executive branch of the United States Government to which they were appointed by the current or former President and confirmed by the United States Senate;

*Historian or historical researcher* means any individual with professional training in the academic field of history (or related fields such as journalism) engaged in a research project leading to publication (or any similar activity such as academic course development) reasonably intended to increase the understanding of the American public into the operations and activities of the United States government;

*Information* means any knowledge that can be communicated or documentary material, regardless of its physical form that is owned by, produced by or for, or is under the control of the United States Government;

*Interested party* means any official in the executive, military, congressional, or judicial branches of government, United States or foreign, or U.S. Government contractor who, in the sole discretion of NACIC, has a subject matter or physical interest in the documents or information at issue;

*Originator* means the NACIC officer who originated the information at issue, or successor in office, or a NACIC officer who has been delegated declassification authority for the information at issue in accordance with the provisions of this Order;

*This Order* means Executive Order 12958 of April 17, 1995 or successor Orders.
### §3307. Communications with the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives

#### (a) Requests of committees

The Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, the Director of a national intelligence center, or the head of any element of the intelligence community shall, not later than 45 days after receiving a written request from the Chair or ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate or the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives for any existing intelligence assessment, report, estimate, or legal opinion relating to matters within the jurisdiction of such Committee, make available to such committee such assessment, report, estimate, or legal opinion, as the case may be.

#### (b) Assertion of privilege

#### (1) In general

In response to a request covered by subsection (a), the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, the Director of a national intelligence center, or the head of any element of the intelligence community shall provide to the Committee making such request the document or information covered by such request unless the President determines that such document or information shall not be provided because the President is asserting a privilege pursuant to the Constitution of the United States.

#### (2) Submission to Congress

The White House Counsel shall submit to Congress in writing any assertion by the President under paragraph (1) of a privilege pursuant to the Constitution.

#### (c) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Intelligence community

The term "intelligence community" has the meaning given the term in section 3003(4) of this title.

#### (2) Intelligence assessment

The term "intelligence assessment" means an intelligence-related analytical study of a subject of policy significance and does not include building-block papers, research projects, and reference aids.

#### (3) Intelligence estimate

The term "intelligence estimate" means an appraisal of available intelligence relating to a specific situation or condition with a view to determining the courses of action open to an enemy or potential enemy and the probable order of adoption of such courses of action.

(Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, §1079, Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 334.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 413c of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### Irwin Vosburgh, Respondent, v. McLean Trucking Company, Appellant.

Order modified by striking therefrom the provision thereof directing the examination of the former employee Robert Hanks (see *McGowan*v. *Eastman,*271 N. Y. 195, 198; *Sundell Go.*v. *Pioneer Bldg.-Loan & Sav. Assn, of Troy,*197 Mise. 580), without prejudice to an application, upon a showing of proper and sufficient grounds, for his examination as a witness; and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Berg an, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

QUINTEZ TALLEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 405 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
§ 1903.12 Alcoholic beverages and controlled substance. ( a ) *Alcoholic beverages.* The possession or transportation of alcoholic beverages in closed containers and their consumption on an Agency installation will be administratively controlled by the Agency outside the provisions of this part.
( b ) *Controlled substances.* The following are prohibited on an Agency installation: ( 1 ) The delivery of a controlled substance, except when distribution is made by a licensed physician or pharmacist in accordance with applicable Federal or State law, or as otherwise permitted by Federal or State law. For the purpose of this paragraph, delivery means the actual, attempt, or constructive transfer of a controlled substance.
( 2 ) The possession of a controlled substance, unless such substance was obtained by the possessor directly from, or pursuant to a valid prescription or ordered by, a licensed physician or pharmacist.
[63 FR 44786, Aug. 21, 1998, as amended at 88 FR 20763, Apr. 7, 2023]
### §13125. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subchapter such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2007.

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(c), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4302.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 13125 | 5 U.S.C. App. (EGA §405) | Pub. L. 95–521, title IV, §405, Oct. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 1863; Pub. L. 98–150, §12, Nov. 11, 1983, 97 Stat. 963; Pub. L. 100–598, §2, Nov. 3, 1988, 102 Stat. 3031; Pub. L. 101–334, §2, July 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 318; Pub. L. 102–506, §2, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3280; Pub. L. 104–179, §3, Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 107–119, §2, Jan. 15, 2002, 115 Stat. 2382; Pub. L. 109–289, div. B, title II, §21069, as added Pub. L. 110–5, §2, Feb. 15, 2007, 121 Stat. 57. |

Section

Although provisions authorizing the appropriation of "such sums as may be necessary" are generally considered unnecessary, and although this provision is obsolete because it explicitly applies only to fiscal year 2007, the provision is nevertheless intentionally restated in chapter 131 of title 5, United States Code.
EXHIBIT 3.4

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                     WESTERN INTERNATIONAL PIZZA CORPORATION


         Western International Pizza Corporation, (the "Corporation") a
corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state
of Nevada, hereby certifies, pursuant to section 78.385 and 78.390 of the Nevada
revised Statutes, that:

         1.       The  Stockholders of the  Corporation  authorized the Board of
                  Directors to amend the Articles of Incorporation to change the
                  name of the  Corporation  pursuant  to  section  78.320 of the
                  Nevada revised Statutes.
         2.       This Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation
                  of the  Corporation  has been duly adopted in accordance  with
                  Section 78.315 of the Nevada Revised Statutes.
         3.       Article I of the Articles of  Incorporation  is hereby amended
                  as follows:

                  ARTICLE 1. The name of the Corporation shall be AccuPoll
         Holding Corp.

                  As of April 8, 2002, the record date for the meeting of
         stockholders held April 26, 2002, the Corporation had 397,500,000
         shares of outstanding Common Stock. The number of shares of Common
         Stock that voted for the name change of the Corporation is 212,673,314,
         with 29,000 abstaining and none opposing.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned certifies under penalty of
         perjury that he has read the forgoing Certificate of Amendment of the
         Articles of Incorporation and knows the contents thereof, and that the
         statements therein are true, and has caused this Certificate of the
         Amendment to be signed this 23rd day of May , 2002.




                                                  /s/ Frank Wiebe
                                                 -------------------------
                                                      Frank Wiebe
                                                      President