alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1161 

Commemorating innocent civilian lives lost in Gaza, especially children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2024 

Mr. GREEN of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating innocent civilian lives lost in Gaza, especially 

children. 

Whereas this resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Original Resolution Commemorating Innocent Civilian Lives Lost in 

Gaza, Especially Children’’; 

Whereas, on October 7, 2023, Hamas conducted a heinous 

attack on Israel, leading to Israel declaring war on 

Hamas, not Palestine or Palestinians; 

Whereas both Palestinians and Israelis are in mourning; 

Whereas, in 2020, the population of Gaza was over 

2,000,000, with approximately half being children under 

the age of 18; 

Whereas the pain, suffering, and deaths of innocent Palestinian men, women, and especially children are too often 

reduced to statisticization; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1161 IH 

Whereas people of good will must do more to humanize the 

pain and suffering of Palestinians in Gaza with explanations of how they lost arms, legs, eyes, hearing, and 

lives; 

Whereas, because of the war, homes, schools, businesses, and 

hospitals within Gaza have been decimated; 

Whereas hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian men, 

women, and especially children in Gaza have suffered 

through the loss of mothers, fathers, brothers, and sisters 

while starving and suffering the mental anguish associated with war; 

Whereas civilians in Gaza live in constant fear of the sudden 

loss of arms, legs, and life; and 

Whereas tens of thousands of innocent civilians, including 

thousands of children, have been brutally killed in a war 

beyond their control: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the House of Representatives commemo3 rates the tens of thousands of innocent civilian lives 

4 lost in Gaza, especially those of children; 

5 (2) the lives lost should be viewed as more than 

6 mere statistics; 

7 (3) the humanity, pain, suffering and deaths of 

8 the tens of thousands of men, woman, and especially 

9 children must be commemorated and memorialized; 

10 (4) the killing of innocent men, women, and es11 pecially children in Palestine must cease imme12 diately; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1161 IH 

1 (5) all hostages must be returned immediately; 

2 and 

3 (6) because United States largesse has contrib4 uted to the purchase of munitions used by the 

5 Netanyahu administration, the United States must 

6 do everything it can to address the humanitarian ca7 tastrophe in Gaza, perpetrated by the destruction of 

8 homes, infrastructure, schools, and hospitals. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Di Ciervo and Matthew Chiarello, Appellants.

Two judgments (one as to each defendant) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both rendered January 5, 1978, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
M. P. No. 77-114.

#### Thomas A. McCormick *v.*State Board of Elections *et al.*

*Keven A. McKenna, for*petitioner.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Stephen F. Achille, William Y. Chaika,*for Lloyd Griffin, for respondents.

The order of April 11, 1977 in this case is vacated.

The petitioner is ordered to file an amended petition setting forth the names of all proper parties forthwith.

Bevilacqua, C. J., not participating.
### §308102. Preservation assistance

(a) In General.—Using the established national historic preservation program to the extent practicable, the Secretary shall encourage, support, assist, recognize, and work in partnership with citizens, Federal, State, local, and tribal governments, other public entities, educational institutions, and private nonprofit organizations in identifying, researching, evaluating, interpreting, and protecting historic battlefields and associated sites on a national, State, and local level.

(b) Financial Assistance.—To carry out subsection (a), the Secretary may use a cooperative agreement, grant, contract, or other generally adopted means of providing financial assistance.

(c) Authorization of Appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000 for each fiscal year, to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3233.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 308102 | 16 U.S.C. 469k–1(b). | Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, subtitle D, §7301(b), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1213. |

Section
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         14,271
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    53,196
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         52,636
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        265,029
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 396,067
<DEPOSITS>                                     322,767
<SHORT-TERM>                                   18,402
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            3,968
<LONG-TERM>                                    15,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,153
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 396,067
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                20,808
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              6,410
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               94
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               27,312
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             10,796
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,815
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          15,497
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  405
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                11,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,644
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     6,644
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,657
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.42
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,451
<LOANS-PAST>                                   298
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,517
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  328
<RECOVERIES>                                   151
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,745
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,462
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        283



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Edith Frankle, Respondent, v Leon Greenman, Appellant.

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated February 24, 1978, which *inter alia,*(1) fixed arrears at $27,920 and (2) denied the appellant’s motion for a downward modification of his support obligations. Order afirmed, without costs or disbursements. We note only that the Family Court’s finding, that petitioner’s daughter Roseanne was a fully matriculated student, was extraneous to the issues presented to that *800court. Roseanne’s educational status will become relevant only when she reaches the age of 21. When and if that question is litigated, the Family Court’s finding should not be given collateral estoppel effect. Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### § 1903.16 Restriction on animals.

Animals, except for those animals used for the assistance of persons with disabilities, or animals under the charge and control of the Central Intelligence Agency, shall not be brought onto an Agency installation for other than official purposes.
**Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2006 – *Commission* v *Spain***

**(Case C-132/04)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 89/391/EEC – Scope – Non-civilian personnel in public authorities – Armed forces and police – Included

1.                     *Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 89/391 on the introduction of measures to encourage
improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (Council Directive 89/391, Arts 2(1), (2) and 4 (see paras 22, 26,
40)*

2.                     *Acts of the institutions – Directives – Implementation by Member States (Art. 249, third para., EC) (see para. 35)*

3.                     *Action for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration –
Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 37)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Incomplete transposition of Article 2(1) and (2) and Article 4 of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ 1989 L 183, p. 1) – Non-civilian personnel in public authorities – Scope of Directive 89/391 |

**Operative part:**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to transpose in their entirety into its national legislation Article 2(1) and (2) and Article 4 of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work, as regards non-civilian personnel in public authorities, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
Editorial Note on Part 800
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54972, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 800 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 800.17 Bonding requirements for underground coal mines and long-term coal-related surface facilities and structures. ( a ) *Responsibilities.* The regulatory authority shall require bond coverage, in an amount determined under § 800.14, for long-term surface facilities and structures, and for areas disturbed by surface impacts incident to underground mines, for which a permit is required. Specific reclamation techniques required for underground mines and long-term facilities shall be considered in determining the amount of bond to complete the reclamation.
( b ) *Long-term period of liability.* ( 1 ) The period of liability for every bond covering long-term surface disturbances shall commence with the issuance of a permit, except that to the extent that such disturbances will occur on a succeeding increment to be bonded, such liability will commence upon the posting of the bond for that increment before the initial surface disturbance of that increment. The liability period shall extend until all reclamation, restoration, and abatement work under the permit has been completed and the bond is released under the provisions of § 800.40, or until the bond has been replaced or extended in accordance with § 800.17(b)(3).
( 2 ) Long-term surface disturbances shall include long-term coal-related surface facilities and structures, and surface impacts incident to underground coal mining, which disturb an area for a period that exceeds 5 years. Long-term surface disturbances include, but are not limited to: surface features of shafts and slope facilities, coal refuse areas, powerlines, bore-holes, ventilation shafts, preparation plants, machine shops, roads, and loading and treatment facilities.
( 3 ) To achieve continuous bond coverage for long-term surface disturbances, the bond shall be conditioned upon extension, replacement, or payment in full, 30 days prior to the expiration of the bond term.
( 4 ) Continuous bond coverage shall apply throughout the period of extended responsibility for successful revegetation and until the provisions of § 800.40 have been met.
( c ) *Bond forfeiture.* The regulatory authority shall take action to forfeit a bond pursuant to this section, if 30 days prior to bond expiration, the operator has not filed: ( 1 ) A performance bond for a new term as required for continuous coverage, or
( 2 ) a performance bond providing coverage for the period of liability, including the period of extended responsibility for successful revegetation.
[48 FR 32959, July 19, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54972, Nov. 17, 2017]
Exhibit
10.7.6




iLabor
Network Supplier Agreement


Amendment
No. 3






WHEREAS,
pursuant to the iLabor Network Supplier Agreement entered into between
ClearPoint Resources, Inc. (“ClearPoint”), Staffchex, Inc. (Staffchex”) and
Staffchex Servicing, Inc. (Staffchex Servicing and together with “Staffchex”,
the “Company”) on February 28, 2008 (the “Agreement”), collectively the parties
(the “Parties), and as Amended on March 16, 2009, and November 18, 2009,
ClearPoint and the Company hereby further amend (the “Third Amendment”) the
Agreement dated this 11th day of January, 2010 as follows:





WHEREAS,
the Company and ClearPoint agreed to a reduction in the Compensation from 1.25%
to 0.75%, effective November 1, 2009 in exchange for the Transferred Accounts,
generating a minimum of $96,153 in gross billings on a weekly basis, and that
minimum has not been met.  The Parties hereby agree that the
Compensation rate effective as of the date of this Amendment No. 3, shall be
0.75% on all Staffchex collections, excluding those accounts listed on
Attachment A of Amendment No. 2.  Of the 0.75% Compensation rate,
0.50% shall be deferred in accordance with Amendment No. 2 until February 1,
2010.   Additionally, Staffchex agrees to direct WFBC to pay
ClearPoint $2,885 per week, effective January 11, 2010, in lieu of Transferred
Accounts until such time as the total Transferred Accounts increases to
$96,153.  For the period December 14, 2009 through January 8, 2010,
Staffchex will pay ClearPoint 3% of actual billings for Transferred
Accounts.  Determination of a completed transfer is in the sole
discretion of ClearPoint.  Further it is agreed that all Compensation,
Prior Compensation, Deferred Compensation, and any amounts due from the
shortfall of Transferred Accounts, will be paid to ClearPoint, or its designee
directly from WFBC from first available funds pursuant to the Account Transfer
Agreement between Staffchex and WFBC dated May 16, 2008, on a weekly
basis.





In
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this iLabor
Network Supplier Amendment No. 3 as of the date above.





This
letter agreement may be executed in two counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which shall be considered one and the same
agreement.





CLEARPOINT
      RESOURCES, INC/s/
      John G. PhillipsName:  John
      G. PhillipsTitle:  CFO


STAFFCHEX,
      INC./s/ Ruben GarzaName:  Ruben
      GarzaTitle:  CEO


STAFFCHEX
      SERVICING, INC./s/
      Ruben GarzaName:  Ruben
      GarzaTitle:  CEO
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



                                                      YEAR ENDED DECEMBER  31,
                                                      ------------------------ 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               1995              1994             1993
                                          ---------------  ----------------  ---------------
<S>                                       <C>              <C>               <C>
 
Primary
   Net loss                                  $(3,157,000)      ($2,873,000)     $(5,408,000)
                                          ---------------  ----------------  --------------- 
   Shares
      Weighted average common
           shares outstanding                  3,680,000         3,678,000        3,676,000
      Net common shares issuable
           on exercise of certain
           stock options                               -                 -                -
                                          ---------------  ----------------  --------------- 
   Average common and common
      share equivalents outstanding,
      as adjusted                              3,680,000         3,678,000        3,676,000
                                          ---------------  ----------------  --------------- 
Primary loss per common share             $(         .86)  $(          .78)   (        1.47)
                                          ---------------  ----------------  --------------- 
 
Assuming full dilution
   Average common and
      common share equivalents
      as adjusted                              3,680,000         3,678,000        3,676,000
   Net additional common shares
      issuable on exercise of
      certain stock options                            -                 -                -
                                          ---------------  ----------------  --------------- 
   Average common and common
      share equivalents outstanding,
      as adjusted                              3,680,000         3,678,000        3,676,000
                                          ---------------  ----------------  --------------- 
Loss per common share assuming              
      full dilution                         $(       .86)    $(        .78)    $(      1.47)
                                          ---------------  ----------------  --------------- 
</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of James H. Mellion, as Executive Assistant District Attorney of Rockland County, Petitioner, v Harry Edelstein, as Judge of the County Court, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 by James H. Mellion, Executive Assistant District Attorney of Rockland County, to prohibit the respondent, a County Court Judge, from accepting guilty pleas, without the consent of the District Attorney, in the cases of *People v Torres*and *People v Bermudez,*now pending before him, and to compel respondent to vacate any pleas already taken in such cases. Petition granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondent is directed to vacate the pleas of guilty already accepted by him from the defendants Torres and Bermudez. Aurea Torres and Anna Bermudez were charged in a one-count indictment with grand larceny in the third degree. At a plea bargaining conference, the Assistant District Attorney present *789agreed to accept a guilty plea from both to the lesser included crime of attempted grand larceny in the third degree, a class A misdemeanor, in full satisfaction of the indictment, upon condition that the minimum sentence to be imposed would be 30 days of jail time, plus a period of probation. Thereafter, at another plea conference, respondent indicated that he would consider imposing an eight-weekend sentence as an alternative if the probation report would permit him to do so. In view of this, the People withdrew their consent to the plea bargain. The respondent subsequently accepted the guilty pleas over the People’s objection. The guilty pleas were erroneously accepted by the respondent (see *Matter of Gribetz v Edelstein,*66 AD2d 788). Although sentencing is completely within the discretion of a trial court, We do not find what might be interpreted as an attempted sentence bargain herein to be an unlawful exercise of the District Attorney’s prerogative. The respondent was a participant in the plea bargaining negotiations and made his thoughts as to sentencing known to the People prior to the plea taking, thus permitting the opportunity for withdrawal of consent in view of the new alternative. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         999,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,002,228
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,002,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,596
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     310,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,002,288
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,427
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                140,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            140,919
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   140,919
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1409.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1409.19<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS is per 1% Beneficiary Interest.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>