alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David J. NobleDavid J. NobleChairman/DirectorAnd Principal Executive Officer05/16/05Date
#### § 228.3 Restrictions on admission to protected property.

Access to protected property shall be restricted to ensure the orderly and secure conduct of Agency business. Admission to protected property will be restricted to employees and other persons with proper authorization who shall, when requested, display government or other identifying credentials to the Security Protective Officers or other duly authorized personnel when entering, leaving, or while on the property.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Bernard E. Davidson, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which held him ineligible for benefits for the period December 16, 1958 to March 15, 1959, finding that he filed for benefits effective March 16, 1959, about one year after he became unemployed, and thus failed to comply with reporting and registration requirements (Labor Law, § 590, subd. 1; § 596). Although claimant was under the care of a physician, he was about and compliance was not prevented by illness or other condition. The board’s findings, being supported by substantial evidence, all of it, in fact, submitted by claimant, must be affirmed: and the record discloses no basis upon which we could disturb the denial *o?*claimant’s application to predate the claim. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Carlin Dennis, Relator, v. John F. McNeill, as Superintendent of Matteawan State Hospital, Respondent.

Application for a writ of habeas corpus denied, on the ground that the application fails to comply with section 1234 of the Civil Practice Act. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
§ 22.210 Authority for providing assistance. ( a ) Before a grant or cooperative agreement may be used, the grants officer must: ( 1 ) Identify the program statute, the statute that authorizes the DoD Component to carry out the activity the principal purpose of which is assistance (see 32 CFR 21.410 through 21.420.
( 2 ) Review the program statute to determine if it contains requirements that affect the: ( i ) Solicitation, selection, and award processes. For example, program statutes may authorize assistance to be provided only to certain types of recipients; may require that recipients meet certain other criteria to be eligible to receive assistance; or require that a specific process shall be used to review recipients' proposals.
( ii ) Terms and conditions of the award. For example, some program statutes require a specific level of cost sharing or matching.
( b ) The grants officer shall ensure that the award of DoD appropriations through a grant or cooperative agreement for a research project meets the standards of 10 U.S.C. 2358, DoD's broad authority to carry out research, even if the research project is authorized under a statutory authority other than 10 U.S.C. 2358. The standards of 10 U.S.C. 2358 are that, in the opinion of the Head of the DoD Component or his or her designee, the projects must be: ( 1 ) Necessary to the responsibilities of the DoD Component.
( 2 ) Related to weapons systems and other military needs or of potential interest to the DoD Component.
[63 FR 12164, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 47160, Aug. 7, 2003]
#### § 910.775 Administrative and judicial review of decisions.

Part 775 of this chapter, *Administrative and Judicial Review of Decisions,* shall apply to all decisions on permits.

[52 FR 13807, Apr. 24, 1987]
### §8451. Disability retirement

(a)(1)(A) An employee who completes at least 18 months of civilian service creditable under section 8411 and has become disabled shall be retired on the employee's own application or on application by the employee's agency.

(B) For purposes of this subsection, an employee shall be considered disabled only if the employee is found by the Office to be unable, because of disease or injury, to render useful and efficient service in the employee's position.

(2)(A) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), an employee shall not be eligible for disability retirement under this section if the employee has declined a reasonable offer of reassignment to a vacant position in the employee's agency for which the employee is qualified if the position—

(i) is at the same grade (or pay level) as the employee's most recent grade (or pay level) or higher;

(ii) is within the employee's commuting area; and

(iii) is one in which the employee would be able to render useful and efficient service.

(B) An employee who is applying for disability retirement under this subchapter shall be considered for reassignment by the employee's agency to a vacant position described in subparagraph (A) in accordance with such procedures as the Office shall by regulation prescribe.

(C) An employee is entitled to appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board under section 7701 any determination that the employee is not unable, because of disease or injury, to render useful and efficient service in a position to which the employee has declined reassignment under this section.

(D) For purposes of subparagraph (A), an employee of the United States Postal Service shall not be considered qualified for a position if such position is in a different craft or if reassignment to such position would be inconsistent with the terms of a collective-bargaining agreement covering the employee.

(b) A Member who completes at least 18 months of service as a Member and is found by the Office to be disabled for useful and efficient service as a Member because of disease or injury shall be retired on the Member's own application.

(c) An employee or Member retiring under this section is entitled to an annuity computed under section 8452.

(Added Pub. L. 99–335, title I, §101(a), June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 565.)
<PAGE>
 
[LETTERHEAD OF MOSS-ADAMS LLP APPEARS HERE]


                                                          EXHIBIT 23.1



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Carver Corporation


We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-65005, 33-70902, 33-50076, 33-31344, 33-23168, 33-
23167 and 33-04273) of our reports on the financial statements and supplementary
schedules dated February 15, 1996, which appear in the December 31, 1995 annual
report on Form 10-K of Carver Corporation, and to the reference to our firm
under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Seattle, Washington
February 15, 1996
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 251 (Thursday, December 31, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 86941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Cell Biology Integrated Review Group; 
Cellular Signaling and Regulatory Systems Study Section.
    Date: January 28-29, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: David Balasundaram, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5189, MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1022, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d9bbb8b5b8aaacb7bdb8abb8b4bd99baaaabf7b7b0b1f7beb6af"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f5d5e535e4c4a515b5e4d5e525b7f5c4c4d1151565711585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Risk, Prevention and Health Behavior 
Integrated Review Group; Biobehavioral Medicine and Health Outcomes 
Study Section.
    Date: February 1-2, 2021.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mark Allen Vosvick, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3110 Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 
402-4128, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f49995869fda829b87829d979fb49a9d9cda939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b161a0910550d14080d1218103b151213551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 23, 2020.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-28936 Filed 12-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Notice: This opin ion is subject to form al revision before publication in the Atl antic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal

errors so that correc tions m ay be made before the boun d volum es go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF AP P EALS

No. 1 5- BG- 45 9

IN RE: HERBER T J. TAN,

Res po nd en t.

Ba r Reg is tra tio n No. 4 96 86 0 BDN: 9 1- 15

BEFORE: Tho m

ps on , Ass oc ia te Ju dg e, an d Neb ek er an d F arre ll , Sen io r Ju dg es

.

ORDER (FILED – J ul y

23 , 20 15 )

On co nsi de ra

tio n of the ce rt ifi ed or de r su sp en di ng res po nd en t fro m th e pr act ic e of la w i n th e st at e o f New Je rs ey for a pe rio d o f on e y ear an d un ti l fu rth er or de r of

th e co ur t, t hi s co ur t’s Ma y 18 , 20 15 , ord er d ire ct in g re sp on de nt to sh ow ca us e why

th e fu nc ti on al eq ui va le nt reci pr oc al di sc ip li ne in th e fo rm of a on e y ear su sp en si on wit h a fit ne ss req ui rem en t sh ou ld no t be im po se d, an d th e st at em en t of Bar Co un se l,

an d it ap pe ari ng th at res po nd en t ha s fai le d to fil e ei th er a res po ns e to th i s c o u rt’s

or de r to sh ow ca us e o r th e aff id av it req ui red by D .C. Bar R . XI, §1 4 (g ), it is

ORDERED th at Herb ert J. Tan is he reb y su sp en de d fo r a pe r i o d o f on e y ear wit h rei ns ta te m en t co nd it io ne d on a sh owi ng of fit ne ss

. Se e In re S ib le y , 99 0 A.2 d

48 3 (D.C. 20 10 ); In re Ful le r , 93 0 A.2d 19 4

, 1 9 8 ( D .C. 20 07 ) (reb ut ta bl e

pr es um pt io n of id en ti cal re c i p ro cal di sc ip li ne ap pl ie s to al l cas es in whi ch th e

res po nd en t d oe s n ot pa rti ci pa te ). It i s

FURTHER ORDERED th at fo r pu rp os es of rei ns ta te m en t th e pe rio d of

res po nd en t’s sus pe ns io n will no t beg in to ru n un ti l su ch ti m e as he fil es a D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 1 4 (g ) affi da vi t.

P ER CURIAM
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of Gustav Radtke et al. to Harvey T. Cleveland.

(Argued March 14, 1882;

decided March 21, 1882.)

*E. T. Wood*for appellant.

*E. H. Berm*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Rapallo, j., absent.

Order affirmed.
Opinion issued November 5, 2013.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00399
- CV

——————————— ANGELLE MARIE KERGOS I E N , Appellant

V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE ASSOCIATION

A/K/A FANNIE MAE , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

A ustin County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 12
- CV
- 4988

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Angelle Marie Kergosien , has neither established indigence nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See2

T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1, 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. Se e T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.3(b). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as
an officer of Handleman Company (the Registrant) that the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended April 29, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.



|                    |  |                                                                       
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 30, 2006 |  | /s/ Stephen Strome                                                    
|                    |  | STEPHEN STROME Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer      
|                    | 
|Date: June 30, 2006 |  | /s/ Thomas C. Braum, Jr.                                              
|                    |  | THOMAS C. BRAUM, JR. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



These certifications are not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Registrant
specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### § 1903.18 Distribution of materials.

Distributing, posting, or affixing materials, such as pamphlets, handbills, or flyers, on any Agency installation is prohibited except as authorized by § 1903.17(b), or by other authorization from the CIA Director of Security, or from his or her designee.

[88 FR 20763, Apr. 7, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9827 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9827

To impose additional duties on imports of goods into the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2024

 Mr. Golden of Maine introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To impose additional duties on imports of goods into the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL DUTIES ON IMPORTS OF GOODS INTO THE 
              UNITED STATES.

    (a) In General.--The President shall--
            (1) impose a duty on imports of any good into the United 
        States in an amount equal to 10 percent ad valorem of the good 
        for each calendar year beginning on or after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act; and
            (2) for each calendar year beginning after the calendar 
        year referred to in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) if the United States has a deficit in the trade 
                of goods and services generally for the immediately 
                preceding calendar year, increase the duty imposed 
                under paragraph (1) on such good by an additional 
                amount equal to 5 percent ad valorem of the good; or
                    (B) if the United States has a balance or surplus 
                in the trade of goods and services generally for the 
                immediately preceding calendar year, decrease the duty 
                imposed under paragraph (1) on such good by an amount 
                equal to 5 percent ad valorem of the good for each 
                calendar year beginning after the calendar year 
                referred to in paragraph (1), except that the duty 
                imposed under paragraph (1) on such good shall not be 
                reduced below $0.
    (b) Duties To Be Considered Additional Duties.--The duty required 
by subsection (a) with respect to a good is in addition to any other 
duty imposed by law with respect to the good.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER XIV—COUNTERING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION OFFICE

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 115–387, §2(a)(1), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5162, substituted "COUNTERING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION OFFICE" for "DOMESTIC NUCLEAR DETECTION OFFICE" in subchapter heading.

This subchapter is comprised of title XIX, formerly title XVIII, of Pub. L. 107–296, as added by Pub. L. 109–347, title V, §501(a), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1932, and renumbered title XIX by Pub. L. 110–53, title I, §104(a)(1), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 294.
#### Peter H. Young, Appellant, *v.*Caroline C. Cuddy et al., Executors, etc., Respondents.

(Argued February 9, 1882;

decided February 10, 1882.)

*Hamilton Ha/rris*for appellant.

*M. H. Hersohlerg*for respondents.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 26.650 Grant. *Grant* means an award of financial assistance that, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship— ( a ) The principal purpose of which is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Federal Government's direct benefit or use; and
( b ) In which substantial involvement is not expected between the Federal agency and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the award.
### §2905. Oath; renewal

(a) An employee of an Executive agency or an individual employed by the government of the District of Columbia who, on original appointment, subscribed to the oath of office required by section 3331 of this title is not required to renew the oath because of a change in status so long as his service is continuous in the agency in which he is employed, unless, in the opinion of the head of the Executive agency, the Secretary of a military department with respect to an employee of his department, or the Commissioners of the District of Columbia, the public interest so requires.

(b) An individual who, on appointment as an employee of a House of Congress, subscribed to the oath of office required by section 3331 of this title is not required to renew the oath so long as his service as an employee of that House of Congress is continuous.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 412.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (a) | 5 U.S.C. 17b. | Aug. 14, 1937, ch. 624, 50 Stat. 640.Nov. 22, 1943, ch. 303, 57 Stat. 591. |
| (b) | 5 U.S.C. 17c. | Mar. 28, 1955, ch. 17, 69 Stat. 14. |

Statutes at Large

Nov. 22, 1943, ch. 303, 57 Stat. 591.

In subsection (a), the word "civilian" is omitted as unnecessary because of the definition of "employee" in section 2105. The words "Executive agency" are coextensive with and substituted for "executive departments and independent establishments of the United States" because of the definition of "Executive agency" in section 105. The words "the Secretary of a military department with respect to an employee of his department" are inserted to preserve the application of the source law. Before enactment of the National Security Act Amendments of 1949 (63 Stat. 578), the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Department of the Air Force were Executive departments. The National Security Act Amendments of 1949 established the Department of Defense as an Executive Department including the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Department of the Air Force as military departments, not as Executive departments. However, the source law for this section, which was in effect in 1949, remained applicable to the Secretaries of the military departments by virtue of section 12(g) of the National Security Act Amendments of 1949 (63 Stat. 591), which is set out in the reviser's note for section 301.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—APPOINTMENT, REASSIGNMENT, TRANSFER, AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter VIII, added Pub. L. 95–437, §3(a), Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1056, which related to part-time career employment opportunities, was redesignated as chapter 34 of this title by Pub. L. 95–454, title IX, §906(c)(1)(A), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1226.
#### § 942.775 Administrative and judicial review of decisions.

Part 775 of this chapter, *Administrative and Judicial Review of Decisions,* shall apply to all decisions on permits.
### Part E—Citizenship and Immigration Services