alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011331EN.01001501.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — 3F v Commission

(Case T-30/03 RENV) (1)

1

(State aid - Fiscal aid granted by the Danish authorities - Seafarers employed on board vessels registered in the Danish International Register - Commission decision not to raise objections - Action for annulment - Serious difficulties)

2011/C 331/25

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: 3F, formerly Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID) (Copenhagen, Denmark) (represented by: P. Bentley QC and A. Worsøe, lawyer, and subsequently by Mr. Bentley and P. Torbøl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and N. Khan, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervening party on behalf of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by V. Pasternak Jørgensen and C. Vang, acting as Agents)

Intervening party on behalf of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2002) 4370 final of 13 November 2002 not to raise objections to the Danish fiscal measures applicable to seafarers employed on board vessels registered in the Danish International Register.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders 3F, formerly Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID), to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission before the Court of Justice and the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders 3F, formerly Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID), to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission before the Court of Justice and the General Court;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs incurred before the Court of Justice and the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs incurred before the Court of Justice and the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 70, 22.3.2003.

1

---
#### § 933.816 Performance standards—surface mining activities.

Part 816 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Surface Mining Activities,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Company                                                               Domicile
-------                                                               --------
<S>                                                                   <C>
MMI Companies, Inc.                                                   Delaware
     AmCon Reinsurance, Inc.                                          Cayman Islands, B.W.I.
     American Continental Insurance Company                           Missouri
        American Continental Life Insurance Company                   Missouri
     Health Providers Insurance Company                               Illinois
     Healthcare Credentials Management Services, Inc.                 Delaware
     Healthcare Risk Underwriters Ltd.                                United Kingdom
     Management Science Associates, Inc.                              Delaware
     McManis Associates, Inc.                                         Delaware
     MMI Agency, Inc.                                                 Illinois
     MMI Risk Management Resources, Inc.                              Illinois
     Healthcare Risk Resources International Ltd.                     United Kingdom
     MMedica Insurance Limited - (80% owned)                          Ireland
     Professional Risk Management, Inc.                               Delaware
     MMI Capital Trust I - (3% (100% of common stock) owned)          Delaware
     Unionamerica Holdings, plc                                       United Kingdom
        Unionamerica Intermediate Company Limited                     United Kingdom
        Unionamerica Acquisition Company Limited                      United Kingdom
           Unionamerica Insurance Company Limited                     United Kingdom
           UA Management Company Limited  - (99% owned)               United Kingdom
           UA Combined Investment Company Limited - (80% owned)       United Kingdom
              Jago Dedicated Limited - (89% owned)                    United Kingdom
              Jago Capital Limited                                    United Kingdom
           Marketform Corporate Member Limited - (95% owned)          United Kingdom
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  |  |                                
| |  |  |  | -------------------------------
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | /s/ David J. Noble             
| |  |  |  | David J. Noble                 
| |  |  |  | Chairman/Director              
| |  |  |  | And Principal Executive Officer
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | November 16, 2009              
| |  |  |  | Date
##### 



Eaton Corporation
First Quarter 2007 Report on Form 10-Q
Item 6
Exhibit 12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 ThreemonthsendedMar. 31,
    
    
    Year ended December 312007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Income from continuing operations
before income taxes
    
    $
    234
    
    
    $
    989
    
    
    $
    988
    
    
    $
    768
    
    
    $
    492
    
    
    $
    384AdjustmentsMinority interest in consolidated
subsidiaries
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    14(Income) losses of equity investees
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (1
    )Interest expensed
    
    
    43
    
    
    
    139
    
    
    
    109
    
    
    
    88
    
    
    
    93
    
    
    
    110Amortization of debt issue costs
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    2Estimated portion of rent expense
representing interest
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    41
    
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    34Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    13Distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    3Adjusted income from continuing
operations before income taxes
    
    $
    292
    
    
    $
    1,194
    
    
    $
    1,158
    
    
    $
    921
    
    
    $
    647
    
    
    $
    556Fixed chargesInterest expensed
    
    $
    43
    
    
    $
    139
    
    
    $
    109
    
    
    $
    88
    
    
    $
    93
    
    
    $
    110Interest capitalized
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    8Amortization of debt issue costs
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    2Estimated portion of rent expense
representing interest
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    41
    
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    34Total fixed charges
    
    $
    57
    
    
    $
    195
    
    
    $
    161
    
    
    $
    134
    
    
    $
    140
    
    
    $
    154Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    5.12
    
    
    
    6.12
    
    
    
    7.19
    
    
    
    6.87
    
    
    
    4.62
    
    
    
    3.61
 Page 20
### §312303. Establishment

(a) Establishment.—There is established a commission to be known as the Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad.

(b) Membership.—The Commission shall consist of 21 members appointed by the President, 7 of whom shall be appointed after consultation with the Speaker of the House of Representatives and 7 of whom shall be appointed after consultation with the President pro tempore of the Senate.

(c) Term.—

(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), a member of the Commission shall be appointed for a term of 3 years.

(2) Vacancy.—A member appointed to fill a vacancy on the Commission shall serve for the remainder of the term for which the member's predecessor was appointed.

(3) Member until successor appointed.—A member may retain membership on the Commission until the member's successor has been appointed.

(d) Chairman.—The President shall designate the Chairman of the Commission from among its members.

(e) Meetings.—The Commission shall meet at least once every 6 months.

(f) Compensation and Expenses.—

(1) Compensation.—Members of the Commission shall receive no pay on account of their service on the Commission.

(2) Expenses.—While away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission, members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in the same manner as individuals employed intermittently in the Government service are allowed expenses under section 5703 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3252.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 312303(a) | 16 U.S.C. 469j(b). | Pub. L. 99–83, title XIII, §1303(b), (d) through (f), Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 280. |
| 312303(b) through (f) | 16 U.S.C. 469j(d) through (f). | |

Section

In subsection (c), the text of 16 U.S.C. 469j(d)(2)(B) is omitted as obsolete.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2006
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 7, 2007
    By:
    /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBSAndrew F. JacobsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 7, 2007
    By:
    /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCHPhillip A. ReinschExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
### §8127. Representation; attorneys' fees

(a) A claimant may authorize an individual to represent him in any proceeding under this subchapter before the Secretary of Labor.

(b) A claim for legal or other services furnished in respect to a case, claim, or award for compensation under this subchapter is valid only if approved by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 545.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 773(b) (less last sentence). | Oct. 14, 1949, ch. 691, §208 "Sec. 23(b) (less last sentence)", 63 Stat. 865. |

Statutes at Large

Administration of this subchapter was transferred to the Secretary of Labor by section 1 of 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 19, 64 Stat. 1271 (see section 8145).

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
#### Marie J. Lederman, Respondent, v. Theodore Lederman, Appellant.

In an action by a wife for a judicial separation, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 15, 1961, as granted plaintiff’s motion for temporary alimony and counsel fees to the extent of directing payment of alimony of $75 a, week and payment of a counsel fee of $750. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
, C.J. 

Hardesty 

"Ter ciDo J. 

Marchand's offense does not warrant the imposition of a temporary 

suspension or referral to a disciplinary board at this time. 

It is so ORDERED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

Parraguirre Douglas 

cc: Stan Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada 

Christopher Marchand 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

2 

(C9 I947A GIDE.>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         154,100                  54,433
<SECURITIES>                                 2,349,792               3,313,664
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,528                 100,359
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (10,500)                (15,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                          35,714                  37,235
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (30,000)                (25,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,612,634               3,465,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,011                  72,322
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,511                  50,511
<COMMON>                                       128,307                 128,307
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,410,805               3,214,551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,612,634               3,465,691
<SALES>                                         89,311                 103,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,311                 103,274
<CGS>                                           76,621                  71,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,621                  71,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                  38,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,690                 (6,917)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,000)                    361
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,690                 (6,556)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,690                 (6,556)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.0

# SUBSIDIARIES

|Name                             |  | Jurisdiction of Formation 
|-------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|                                
|CyberOptics UK, Ltd.             |  | United Kingdom            
|                                
|CyberOptics Holdings UK, Ltd.    |  | United Kingdom            
|                                
|CyberOptics (Singapore) Pte. Ltd |  | Singapore                 
|                                
|CyberOptics Semiconductor, Inc.  |  | Minnesota                 
|                                
|CyberOptics (China) Co., Ltd.    |  | Peoples Republic of China

54

---
#### § 939.955 Certification of blasters.

Part 955 of this chapter, *Certification of Blasters in Federal Program States and on Indian Lands,* shall apply to the training, examination and certification of blasters for surface coal mining and reclamation operations.

[51 FR 19462, May 29, 1986]
### SUBCHAPTER I—FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL PERSONNEL
Exhibit 10.4.1



FIRST AMENDMENT TO REORGANIZATION AGREEMENT



This First Amendment to Reorganization Agreement (Amendment) is entered into by and among ConocoPhillips, Duke
Capital LLC and Duke Energy Field Services, LLC.



Recitals



ConocoPhillips, Duke Capital LLC and
Duke Energy Field Services, LLC are parties to a Reorganization Agreement dated May 26, 2005 (the Agreement). Any capitalized term used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Agreement.



The Parties desire to amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms of
this Amendment.



NOW, THEREFORE, in and for the terms and
provisions hereof and other good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows:



1. Amendment. Section 3.3(a) is generally amended to reflect that any transfer to be made by the Company pursuant to clause (ii) thereof shall be in U.S. dollars (versus Canadian Dollars) and the amount to be
transferred pursuant to clause (ii) thereof shall be converted to U.S. dollars from Canadian Dollars using the Bank of Canada Noon Canadian/USD Exchange Rate on June 30, 2005 as reflected on Bloomberg screen CDCFUSD Index on the same
date.



2. Miscellaneous. This Amendment may be executed
in one or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and same agreement, and shall be effective when the one or more counterparts have been signed by each Party and delivered (including by facsimile) to the other Parties.



Executed and delivered on the date first set forth above.



CONOCOPHILLIPSBy:

/s/ John E. LoweName:

John E. LoweTitle:

Executive Vice President, Planning, Strategy and
Corporate AffairsDUKE CAPITAL LLCBy:

/s/ Paul H. BarryName:

Paul H. BarryTitle:

Vice PresidentDUKE ENERGY FIELD SERVICES, LLCBy:

/s/ Brent L. BackesName:

Brent L. BackesTitle:

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
### Deformation of host rocks and flow of magma during growth of minette dikes and breccia-bearing intrusions near Ship Rock, New Mexico

By: Paul T. DelaneyDavid D. Pollard

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1202

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-3724

___________ Johnny Paul Dodson, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * E astern District of Arkansas. Department of Correction; Ray Hobbs, * Assistant Director, Arkansas * [UNPUBLISHED] Department of Correction; Gaylon Lay, * Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC; Randall * Manus, Assistant Warden, Cummins * Unit, ADC; Kim Luckett, Assistant * Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC; William * Fowler, Treatment Coordinator, * Cummins Unit, ADC; Angela West, * Mailroom Supervisor, Cummins Unit, * ADC; Melody Barnett, Inmate * Attorney; Sue Newbery, Criminal * Justice Coordinator, Arkansas Supreme * Court, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: January 30, 2006 Filed: February 22, 2006

___________ Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopti ng in part the report and recommendations of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2- PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Johnny Dodson appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust and the court’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel.
We conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing Dodson’s complaint against the prison officials for failure to e xhaust, as the record does not show Dodson filed any grievances about his claims against defendants Melody Barnett, Randall Manus, Gaylon Lay, Ray Hobbs , and Larry Norris. See Graves v. Norris , 218 F.3d 884, 885 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (p risoner must exhaust all available administrative remedies before § 1983 acti on can be brought with respect to prison conditions; when multiple prison claims are joined, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) requires exhaustion as to all claims).
As for the claims against defendant Susan Newbery, in her capacity as Criminal Justice Coordinator for the Arkansas Supr eme Court, the district court properly dismissed the claim for monetary dama ges with prejudice due to immunity, as Newbery was clearly acting in her official capacity. SeeMorstad v. Dept. of Corrs. and Rehab. , 147 F.3d 741, 744 (8th Cir. 1998). Although Newbery was not immune from Dodson’s requested injunctive relief, see Campbell v. Ark. Dept. of Corr. , 155 F.3d 950, 962 (8th Ci r. 1998), injunctive relief would be inappropriate, because Dodson failed to show, among other things, that he was faced with a threat of irreparable harm, see Davis v. Francis Howell Sch. Dist. , 104 F.3d 204, 205-06 (8th Cir. 1997).-3- Finally, we conclude that the court di d not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for appointment of counsel. See Abdullah v. Gunter , 949 F.2d 1032, 1035 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied , 504 U.S. 930 (1992). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________