NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LTD., CREATIVE LABS,

INC.,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

GOOGLE LLC, MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, 

LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., LENOVO 

GROUP LTD., BLACKBERRY LTD., BLACKBERRY 

CORPORATION, HTC CORPORATION, HTC 

AMERICA, INC., LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG 

ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., LG ELECTRONICS 

MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC., SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SONY 

CORPORATION, SONY MOBILE 

COMMUNICATIONS INC., SONY MOBILE 

COMMUNICATIONS AB, SONY MOBILE 

COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC., ZTE 

CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC.,

Intervenors

______________________ 

2016-2715

______________________ 
 

Appeal from the United States International Trade 

Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-994.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JONATHAN DANIEL BAKER, Farney Daniels PC, San 

Mateo, CA, argued for appellants. Also represented by 

MICHAEL D. SAUNDERS, GURTEJ SINGH. 

 HOUDA MORAD, Office of the General Counsel, United 

States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

argued for appellee. Also represented by WAYNE W.

HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, DOMINIC L.

BIANCHI. 

 DAN L. BAGATELL, Perkins Coie LLP, Hanover, NH, 

argued for all intervenors. Intervenors Google LLC, and

Motorola Mobility LLC, Lenovo (United States) Inc., 

Lenovo Group Ltd., Blackberry Ltd., and Blackberry

Corporation also represented by VERONICA SUSANA 

ASCARRUNZ, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, 

Washington, DC. Intervenors Blackberry Ltd. and Blackberry Corporation also represented by DANIEL P. MUINO, 

Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC; VINCENT 

JOSEPH BELUSKO, Los Angeles, CA.

 FRED WILLIAMS, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Austin, TX, for 

intervenors HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. 

Also represented by JONATHAN LLOYD HARDT. 

 SCOTT ANDREW ELENGOLD, Fish & Richardson, PC, 

Washington, DC, for intervenors LG Electronics, Inc., LG 

Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics Mobilecomm 

U.S.A., Inc. Also represented by CHRISTIAN A. CHU,

MICHAEL J. MCKEON. 
 3

 RICHARD L. RAINEY, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, for intervenors Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 

and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Also represented 

by ALEXANDER CHINOY; GREGORY SCOTT NIEBERG, New 

York, NY; ALICE JUWON AHN, San Francisco, CA.

 MICHAEL N. RADER, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, 

Boston, MA, for intervenors Sony Corporation, Sony 

Mobile Communications Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. 

Also represented by CHRISTOPHER HENRY, GERALD B.

HRYCYSZYN; JAMES ALTMAN, BARBARA A. MURPHY, Foster, 

Murphy, Altman & Nickel, PC, Washington, DC.

 LYLE BRENT VANDER SCHAAF, Brinks Gilson & Lione, 

Washington, DC, for intervenors ZTE Corporation and

ZTE (USA) Inc. Also represented by JEFFREY J.

CATALANO, RALPH JOSEPH GABRIC, Chicago, IL. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court