alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Map 3-24: Watersheds and

Surface Water Features

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundaries

County Boundaries

Major Rivers and Streams

Watersheds

Bear River

Big Horn River

Cheyenne River

Great Divide-Upper Green River

Great Salt Lake

Little Missouri River

Niobrara River

North Platte River

Powder-Tongue Rivers

South Platte River

Upper Snake River

Upper Yellowstone River

White-Yampa Rivers

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
#### § 819.17 Auger mining: Subsidence protection.

Auger mining shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of § 817.121 (a) and (c) of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
the year ended  December  31,  1996 for May  Limited  Partnership  1984-3 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000765946
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         390
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  535
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               925
<PP&E>                                         7,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   925
<SALES>                                        2,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,301
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,063
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,063
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  207.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  207.15
        


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-15-00236-CV

Silvia G. Sanchez and Isaias Sanchez 

v.

Federal National Mortgage Association

NO. 1056888 IN THE CO CIVIL CT AT LAW NO 1 OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

$10.00

$68.00

$175.00

$20.00

04/03/2015

03/20/2015

03/17/2015

03/17/2015

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$273.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this June 26, 2015.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Gloria Hall, Respondent. Lord and Taylor, Appellant; Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Motion for an order appointing an attorney at law to represent the claimant-respondent. Motion granted and Donald L. Slater, Esq., 12 Central Ave., Cortland, New York, is hereby assigned as counsel for claimant-respondent.
EXHIBIT 10.7
                                                                    ------------

             AMENDMENT TO SUTRON CORPORATION STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS

Pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in the Sutron Corporation Stock
Option Agreements dated November 1, 1996 and October 18, 2002 (the "Agreement")
between Raul S. McQuivey and Sutron Corporation, and the Sutron Corporation 1996
Stock Option Plan and 2002 Stock Option Plan (the "Plans"), you were granted
options to purchase 93,600 shares and 110,000 shares of Sutron Corporation
Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.125 and $.55. Your options originally
vested over a five year period.

On December 22, 2005, the Board of Directors of Sutron Corporation approved
amendments to all outstanding stock option agreements whereby Sutron accelerated
the vesting of all unvested options issued under the Plan, including your
options. As a result of such acceleration, effective December 22, 2005, all of
your options to purchase Sutron Corporation Common Stock that were not then
vested became immediately vested and exercisable. Accordingly, effective
December 22, 2005 all of your options to purchase Sutron Corporation Common
Stock are immediately vested and exercisable. All other terms and conditions of
your Agreements remain unchanged.

This Amendment is effective as of December 22, 2005. As amended by this letter,
all of the provisions of the Agreement are hereby approved, confirmed and
ratified. Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing terms by signing in
the space provided below and returning the originally executed letter.

SUTRON CORPORATION
By:      /s/ Robert F. Roberts, Jr.
         --------------------------------
          Robert F. Roberts, Jr.

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO THIS 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2005
By:      /s/ Raul S. McQuivey
         --------------------------------
         Raul S. McQuivey
#### In the Matter of Ramon Falu, Appellant, v Edward Hammock, as Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to compel respondent to place petitioner on parole or, alternatively, to provide him with a new parole hearing, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 18, 1977, which denied his application. Appeal dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner seeks to annul the determination of the Board of Parole dated September 19, 1977, which denied him release on parole. However, the petitioner has since been released on parole and, therefore, any decision by this court would necessarily be academic (see *Matter of La Croix v Olgiati,*60 AD2d 652). Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe Microgravity Vibration Isolation Mount: A Dynamic Model for Optimal Controller DesignVibration acceleration levels on large space platforms exceed the requirements of many space experiments. The Microgravity Vibration Isolation Mount (MIM) was built by the Canadian Space Agency to attenuate these disturbances to acceptable levels, and has been operational on the Russian Space Station Mir since May 1996. It has demonstrated good isolation performance and has supported several materials science experiments. The MIM uses Lorentz (voice-coil) magnetic actuators to levitate and isolate payloads at the individual experiment/sub-experiment (versus rack) level. Payload acceleration, relative position, and relative orientation (Euler-parameter) measurements are fed to a state-space controller. The controller, in turn, determines the actuator currents needed for effective experiment isolation. This paper presents the development of an algebraic, state-space model of the MIM, in a form suitable for optimal controller design.Document ID19970025158Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHampton, R. David*(McNeese State Univ. Lake Charles, LA United States)*Tryggvason, Bjarni V.*(Canadian Space Agency Saint Hubert, Quebec Canada)*DeCarufel, Jean*(Canadian Space Agency Saint Hubert, Quebec Canada)*Townsend, Miles A.*(Virginia Univ. Charlottesville, VA United States)*Wagar, William O.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1997Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberE-10766NASA-TM-107478NAS 1.15:107478Accession Number97N24781Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 963-60-0CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970025158.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
•

SPA 19

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 167 C: Land Disposal Restrictions

Phase IV--Corrections (cont'd)

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 167 C

Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV - Corrections

63 PR 28556-28753

May 26,1998

as amended at 63 PR 31266, June 8, 1998

(RCRA Cluster VIII, HSWA provisions)

x

e vaca e was es S ou remam as sown m e av , ruemta es an

STATEANALOG IS:

ANALOGOUS STATE

FEDERALREQUIREMENTS FEDERALRCRA CITAnON CITATION EQUIV- LESS MORE BROADER WAC 173-303- STRIN- STRIN- ALENT GENT GENT IN SCOPE

PART 268 - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS

SUBPART A - GENERAL

TREATMENT SURFACE ThfPOUNDMENT EXEMPTION

140(2)(a)

The State has

incorporated 40

CPR 268 by

reference. The

checklist entries

were deleted to

save space and

paper.

replace colon after

"at least annually"

with a semicolon;

delete second 268.4(a)(2)(ii)

sentence beginning

with "However,

residues which are"

Note: On August 10, 1998 (63 FR 42580), a rule was promulgated to clarify the correct adoption sequence of the

May 4,1998 rule (63 FR 24596, CL 165), the May 26, 1998 rule (63 FR 28556, CL 167), and the June 29, 1998

(63 FR 35147) technical amendment to the May 4, 1998 rule, as they relate to the organobromine production waste

entries at 40 CFR 268.40 and 268.48. Subsequently, on April 9, 1999, the U.S. Court of Appeals vacated the

listing of these organobromine production wastes and in tum, the May 4, 1998; June 29, 1998; and August 10,

1998 rules have been withdrawn. If a State chooses to follow this vacatur, it should remove the vacated wastes in

the tables at 40 CFR 268.40 and 268.48, as indicated in footnotes 3 and 4. If the vacatur is not followed by a State,

then th t d t h ld . h . th M 26 1998 I' bl 40 CFR 268 40 d 268 48

•

APPENDIX vm TO PART 268

revise title; add in 140(2)(a) alphanumeric order Appendix vm End ofIBR X

the entry for "NA"

•
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32-2


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, David E. Meador, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The
Detroit Edison Company (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 13, 2003                      /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                                              David E. Meador
                            Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
                                         The Detroit Edison Company
December 28, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RC Aerial Platforms, LLC 

225 Crossroads Blvd. STE 328 

Carmel, CA 93923 

831.291 .3971 

www.rcaerialplatforms.com 

Re. Petition to Amend FAA Exemption No. 13566 (the "Exemption") 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

RC Aerial Platforms, LLC, hereby requests approval to amend the Exemption to permit RCAP to 

operate an additional model of UAS-the DJI Phantom 3 Professional (N214AP). The FAA has 

previously authorized use of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional for commercial purposes on 

multiple occasions (e.g., Exemption Nos. 13022, 11822, 11481). 

On November 6, 2015, the FAA issued the Exemption to RCAP to utilize the DJIInspire 1, RC 

Timer S-1100 Pro, and RC Timer Trooper Y6 UAS for aerial data collection. 

All UAS operations will continue to fully adhere to the conditions of the Exemption and all 

operations will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption. 

Thank you for your consideration of our request. 

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 831 .291 .3971 . 

Sincerel urs , 

RC Aerial Platforms, LLC
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1098 

Supporting the designation of April 2024 as ‘‘National Native Plant Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2024 

Mr. NEGUSE (for himself, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. CASE, and Mr. BUCK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of April 2024 as ‘‘National 

Native Plant Month’’. 

Whereas native plants are indigenous species that have 

evolved and occur naturally in a particular region, ecosystem, and habitat; 

Whereas there are more than 17,000 native plant species in 

the United States, which include trees, shrubs, vines, 

grasses, and wildflowers; 

Whereas native plants help prevent flooding, drought, and 

erosion and can help restore damaged ecosystems; 

Whereas native plants provide shelter as well as nectar, pollen, and seeds that serve as food for native butterflies, insects, birds, and other wildlife in ways that non-native 

plants cannot; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1098 IH 

Whereas more than 200 of the native plant species in the 

United States are estimated to have been lost since the 

early 19th century; 

Whereas habitat loss and degradation, extreme weather 

events, and invasive species have contributed to the decline of native plants in the United States; and 

Whereas native plants are essential components of resilient 

ecosystems and the natural heritage of the United States: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Na3 tive Plant Month’’; and 

4 (2) recognizes the benefits of native plants to 

5 the environment and economy of the United States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

                          Independent Auditors Consent


The Board of Directors
Lancer Corporation:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-36393) on Form S-8 of Lancer Corporation of our report dated March 11, 1998,
relating  to  the  consolidated   balance  sheets  of  Lancer   Corporation  and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 1997 and 1996,  and the related  consolidated
statements of income,  shareholders  equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the  three-year  period ended  December 31,  1997,  and related  consolidated
financial  statement  schedule,  which  report  appears in the December 31, 1997
annual report on Form 10-K of Lancer Corporation.






KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

San Antonio, Texas
March 11, 1998
§ 931.16 Required program amendments. Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17, New Mexico is required to submit for OSM's approval the following proposed program amendments by the dates specified. ( a ) - ( aa ) [Reserved]
[55 FR 48841, Nov. 23, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 28486, June 21, 1991; 56 FR 67527, Dec. 31, 1991; 57 FR 12723, Apr. 13, 1992; 58 FR 65929, Dec. 17, 1993; 61 FR 26836, May 29, 1996; 65 FR 18894, Apr. 10, 2000; 65 FR 54795, Sept. 11, 2000; 65 FR 65779, Nov. 2, 2000; 67 FR 46385, July 15, 2002]
Map 3-22: BLM Visual Resource

Management Classifications

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundaries

County Boundaries

BLM Surface Management by VRM Class

VRM Class I

VRM Class II

VRM Class III

VRM Class IV

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
##### 



EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARY OF THE REGISTRANT

|                   |  |                  |     |                        |  |           |  | 
|------------------ |  | ---------------- | --- | ---------------------- |  | --------- |  | 
|                   |  | Percentage Owned |     | State of Incorporation
|                   |  |                  |     |                       
|Greene County Bank |  |                  | 100 | %                      |  | Tennessee

SUBSIDIARIES OF GREENE COUNTY BANK

|                                  |  |  |     |   |  |           |  | 
|--------------------------------- |  |  | --- | - |  | --------- |  | 
|Superior Financial Services, Inc. |  |  | 100 | % |  | Tennessee
|GCB Acceptance Corporation        |  |  | 100 | % |  | Tennessee
|Fairway Title Company             |  |  | 100 | % |  | Tennessee
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with this Annual Report of Sionix Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in
my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and,




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
    Report.







Date:
January 13, 2010




/s/
      David R. WellsDavid
      R. WellsPresident,
      Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer







A
certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject
to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates
it by reference.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 15


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that our report dated October 13, 1998 on our review of the interim
financial information of Dexter Corporation as of September 30, 1998 and 1997
and for the three and nine-month periods then ended and included in this Form
10-Q, is incorporated by reference in the Company's registration statements on
Form S-8, Registration Nos. 2-63959, 33-27597, 33-53307, 33-53309, 333-02985,
333-04081, and 333-42663. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of
1933, this report should not be considered a part of the registration statements
prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Springfield, Massachusetts
November 13, 1998
#### § 1801.14 Fees.

No fees will be charged for any action under the authority of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, irrespective of the fact that a request is or may be processed under the authority of both the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act.
#### Northern Haulers Corporation, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

Appeal by the State from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for property damage. There is little dispute as to the facts. While the tractor-trailer of the plaintiff was being operated in an easterly direction on Route 5 in the Village of St. Johnsville on July 12, 1956 about 4:00 a.m., the trailer collided with an overhanging limb of a tree, which resulted in extensive property damage to it. The overhanging limb was 12 feet above the curb and the trailer was from 12 feet to 121⁄2 feet in height. The plaintiff produced by witnesses and photographs testimony which demonstrated that the limb of the tree overhung the road; that the condition had existed over a long period of time; that there were no signs and the State had actual and constructive notice of this condition which it had allowed to continue. The only evidence presented by the State consisted of exhibits. The facts were sufficient to sustain a finding of negligence on the part of the State which was the proximate cause of the accident and freedom from contributory negligence on the part of the driver of plaintiff’s tractor-trailer. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.