alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 800
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54972, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 800 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 800.4 Regulatory authority responsibilities. ( a ) The regulatory authority shall prescribe and furnish forms for filing performance bonds.
( b ) The regulatory authority shall prescribe by regulation terms and conditions for performance bonds and insurance.
( c ) The regulatory authority shall determine the amount of the bond for each area to be bonded, in accordance with § 800.14. The regulatory authority shall also adjust the amount as acreage in the permit area is revised, or when other relevant conditions change according to the requirements of § 800.15.
( d ) The regulatory authority may accept a self-bond if the permittee meets the requirements of § 800.23 and any additional requirements in the State or Federal program.
( e ) The regulatory authority shall release liability under a bond or bonds in accordance with § 800.40.
( f ) If the conditions specified in § 800.50 occur, the regulatory authority shall take appropriate action to cause all or part of a bond to be forfeited in accordance with procedures of that section.
( g ) The regulatory authority shall require in the permit that adequate bond coverage be in effect at all times. Except as provided in § 800.16(e)(2), operating without a bond is a violation of a condition upon which the permit is issued.
[48 FR 32959, July 19, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93381, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54972, Nov. 17, 2017]
NO. 07-01-0079-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	JANUARY 17, 2002

	______________________________

	EX PARTE JOHN MAYTON

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. L-2925; HONORABLE JAMES W. ANDERSON, JUDGE

	_______________________________

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	Proceeding pro se, John Mayton filed a petition for a pretrial writ of habeas corpus in the County Court at Law of Randall County claiming that the summons on a charge of obscene display and his misdemeanor bond in cause number 167141, Justice Court Precinct One, Randall County, was based on a defective charging instrument that rendered his restraint by virtue of a summons and bond illegal.  Following an evidentiary hearing the petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied and the stay of the proceedings in justice court was dissolved.  Presenting two issues, Mayton contends 1) the initial complaint and information was insufficient as a matter of law and failed to invoke the jurisdiction of the justice court, and  2) the unfiled and “revised” complaint and information was insufficient as a matter of law to invoke the jurisdiction of the justice court.  Based upon the rationale expressed herein, we affirm.

	Habeas corpus is an extraordinary writ and will not be entertained where there is an adequate remedy at law.  Ex parte Groves, 571 S.W.2d 888, 890 (Tex.Cr.App. 1978).  Habeas corpus may not be used as a substitute for appeal.  See Ex parte Hopkins, 610 S.W.2d 479, 480 (Tex.Cr.App. 1980); Ex parte Powell, 558 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Tex.Cr.App. 1977).  Moreover, the writ is generally not available before trial to test the sufficiency of the complaint, information, or indictment.  See Ex parte Weise, 55 S.W.3d 617, 620 (Tex.Cr.App. 2001).  One exception is when the applicant alleges the statute under which he is prosecuted is unconstitutional on its face.  Id.  However, Mayton did not allege that the obscene display statute, Tex. Pen. Code Ann. 43.22 (Vernon 1994), was facially unconstitutional.  Thus, issues one and two are overruled.

	Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

							Per Curiam 

Do not publish.
#### § 21.510 Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA?

The Federal Program Information Act (31 U.S.C. 6101 through 6106), as implemented through OMB guidance at 2 CFR 200.202 requires the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies to provide certain information about their assistance programs to the OMB and the General Services Administration (GSA). The GSA makes this information available to the public by publishing it in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA).

[68 FR 47153, Aug. 7, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 51240, Aug. 19, 2020]
#### Paul E. Kelley, Appellant, v. Hearst Corporation, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**UNDER18 U.S.C. 1350**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                In connection withthe Annual Report of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Christensen, SeniorVice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                      The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                      The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financialcondition and results of operations of HickoryTech.

 
| Date: February 29, 2008 | /s/ David A. Christensen                          |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                         | David A. Christensen                              |
|                         | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 30, 2003


                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                           For the month of July 2003
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                        MODERN TIMES GROUP MTG AB (publ)

                   Skeppsbron 18, S-103 13, Stockholm, Sweden

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

         Form 20-F...X...                                   Form 40-F......


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         Yes......                                          No...X...


If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):

..............................N/A................................................


<PAGE>



                               [MODERN TIMES LOGO]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                               30 July 2003


            SCHEDULE FOR ANNOUNCEMENT OF SECOND QUARTER RESULTS 2003


                           WEDNESDAY, 6TH AUGUST 2003


                     STATEMENT ISSUED: 12.00 BST (07.00 EST)
                     Available at company website www.mtg.se


                     CONFERENCE CALL: 14.00 BST (09.00 EST)

Presented By:       Hans-Holger Albrecht - President and Chief Executive Officer
                    Mia Brunell - Chief Financial Officer
                    Andrew Barron - Chief Operating Officer

          PLEASE EMAIL info@mtg.se TO REGISTER FOR THE CONFERENCE CALL.
                (Alternatively, the conference call will also be
                    streamed live from the company website.)


For further information, please telephone +44 20 7321 5010.


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                    MODERN TIMES GROUP MTG AB (publ)



                                    By:  /s/ Hans-Holger Albrecht
                                         ------------------------
                                    Name: Hans-Holger Albrecht


Dated:  July 30, 2003
#### § 196.550 Sex as a bona fide occupational qualification.

A recipient may take action otherwise prohibited by §§ 196.500 through 196.550 provided it is shown that sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for that action, such that consideration of sex with regard to such action is essential to successful operation of the employment function concerned. A recipient shall not take action pursuant to this section that is based upon alleged comparative employment characteristics or stereotyped characterizations of one or the other sex, or upon preference based on sex of the recipient, employees, students, or other persons, but nothing contained in this section shall prevent a recipient from considering an employee's sex in relation to employment in a locker room or toilet facility used only by members of one sex.
FERRY

STEVENS

OKANOGAN

LINCOLN

SPOKANE

PEND OREILLE

GRANT

CANADA

IDAHO

89.7

59.8

965

31.3

46.5

50.3

76.5

82

119

115

33.6

39.7

84.1

58.2

98.8

90.1

44.3

36.4

70.8

85.9

49.6

57.3

62.8

39.4

51.2

0 25 50 MILES

0 25 50 KILOMETERS

119° 118° 117°

49°

48°

EXPLANATION

Generalized geologic material at the open 

interval of the well—Number is uranium 

concentration labeled only when greater 

than or equal to 30 micrograms per liter

BT - basalt and interbeds

GN - gneiss

GR - granite

LM - limestone

M - multiple units

QT - quartz or quartzite

SG - sand and gravel; some silt and clay

SH - shale

Base from U.S. Geological Survey digital data, 1:750,000

Lambert Conformal Conic projection: State Plane Washington North

Figure 5. Locations of wells with associated uranium concentrations showing generalized geologic material of open interval, Ferry, Pend Oreille, and Stevens

Counties, Washington. Wells with groundwater samples with uranium concentrations greater than or equal to 30 micrograms per liter are labeled.
### §5113. Classification records

The Office of Personnel Management may—

(1) prescribe the form in which each agency shall record the duties and responsibilities of positions and the places where these records shall be maintained;

(2) examine these or other pertinent records of the agency; and

(3) interview employees of the agency who have knowledge of the duties and responsibilities of positions and information as to the reasons for placing a position in a class or grade.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 456; Pub. L. 95–454, title IX, §906(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1224.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 1106. | Oct. 28, 1949, ch. 782, §506, 63 Stat. 959. |

Statutes at Large

In paragraph (1), the words "to which this chapter applies" are omitted as unnecessary in view of section 5102.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–454 substituted "Office of Personnel Management" for "Civil Service Commission".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–454 effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
### §5734. Travel, transportation, and relocation expenses of employees transferred from the Postal Service

Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, officers and employees of the United States Postal Service promoted or transferred under section 1006 of title 39, United States Code, from the Postal Service to an agency (as defined in section 5721 of this title), for permanent duty may be authorized travel, transportation, and relocation expenses and allowances under the same conditions and to the same extent authorized by this subchapter for other transferred employees within the meaning of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 99–234, title I, §106(a), Jan. 2, 1986, 99 Stat. 1758.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective (1) on effective date of regulations to be promulgated not later than 150 days after Jan. 2, 1986, or (2) 180 days after Jan. 2, 1986, whichever occurs first, see section 301(a) of Pub. L. 99–234, set out as an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment note under section 5701 of this title.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Ju ly 15, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00061

- CR

Edison CARRAMAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CR

- 6386

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due July 13, 2022. On July 13, 2022, appellant filed a

motion requesting an extension of time to file his brief until September 12, 2022. After

consideration, we GRANT IN PART the motion and O RDER appellant to file his brief by

August 12, 2022.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on thi s 15th day of July, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
§ 1665.7 Information available to the public or to those seeking confirmation of SSS registration status to convey benefits related to registration. ( a ) SSS maintains a record which contains the name, Selective Service number, and registration status of those that have registered with SSS.
( b ) Any compensated employee of SSS may disclose to an entity seeking to convey a benefit related to SSS registration status by law whether the individual has or has not registered with SSS.
[47 FR 7224, Feb. 18, 1982; 69 FR 1525, Jan. 9, 2004, as amended at 89 FR 35006, May 1, 2024]
Exhibit 31.4







Certification Pursuant

To 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Jole Deal, Chief Financial Officer certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Cyanotech Corporation;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|Date: August 27, 2015 | /s/ Jole Deal                                                                                       
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Jole DealVice President—Finance & Administration and CFO(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
### §200102. Definitions

As used in this chapter:

(1) State.—The term "State", to the extent practicable, as determined by the Secretary, includes Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

(2) United States.—The term "United States"—

(A) includes the District of Columbia; and

(B) to the extent practicable, as determined by the Secretary, includes Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3169.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 200102 | 16 U.S.C. 460l–3. | Pub. L. 88–29, §4, May 28, 1963, 77 Stat. 50; Pub. L. 96–205, title VI, §608(c), Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 92. |

Section

The words "the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands" are omitted as obsolete. See note at 48 U.S.C. prec. 1681. For continued application of certain laws of the United States in certain cases, see the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of America (48 U.S.C. 1801 note), the Compact of Free Association between the Government of the United States of America and the Governments of the Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia (48 U.S.C. 1901 note), and the Compact of Free Association between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Palau (48 U.S.C. 1931 note). The words "as determined by the Secretary" are added to make it clear that it is the Secretary who determines if it is practicable to include the stated entities.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50383

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALVIN SHINETTE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-91-CR-94-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alvin Shinette, Jr., appeals the denial of his motion for

return of property, specifically, $18.12, which he alleges was

seized from him along with $14,880 when he was arrested shortly

after robbing a bank in Midland, Texas, in 1991. The total

amount seized was $14,898.12. The bank reported $14,880 missing

and Shinette contends that the remaining $18.12 is his personal

property. He seeks relief pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e). 
No. 96-50383

- 2 -

There is no evidence in the record to indicate that Shinette

was the lawful owner of any of the money seized when he was

arrested. The district court did not abuse its discretion in

denying Shinette’s motion. See Industrias Cardoen, Ltda. v.

United States, 983 F.2d 49, 51 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v.

Schinnell, 80 F.3d 1064, 1067 (5th Cir. 1996). 

This appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we impose upon

Shinette a sanction in the amount of $200 payable to the clerk of

this court for deposit with the United States Treasury. Until

such is paid, the clerk of this court shall not accept from

Shinette, except upon the written permission of a judge of this

court, any further briefs, motions, pleadings, or notices of

appeal, even if such nonacceptance results in the clerk’s

dismissal of Shinette’s existing appeals under Fifth Circuit Rule

42.3.1.2 for failure to prosecute. 

APPEAL DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

SANCTION IMPOSED.
# E C 

# /

R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Telephone: (919)484

- 0222  Fax: (919) 484

- 0122 MEMORANDUM

DATE: Au gust 1, 2013

SUBJECT: Summary of May 1 3 , 2013, Teleconference with Representatives from British

Petroleum

FROM: Heather P. Brown

, EC/R Incorporated

TO: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/FIG

I. PURPOSE

This memorandum summarizes the May 1 3 , 2013 teleconference between the Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) and British Petroleum (BP) personnel. The intent of the teleconference

was to allow BP personnel to ask clarifying questions about the structure of the regulatory text

before preparing written comments on the April 12, 2013, proposed amendments.

II. DATE

The meeting took place on May 13 , 2013, via teleconference at 2 :00 p m.

III. ATTENDEES

The following individuals participated in the teleconference:

BP Personnel

Jeff Adams

Matt Colbreth

R uben Herrera

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Bruce Moore , Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS)

Marcia Mia, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA)

Rachel Agnew , OAQPS

EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown

David Hendricks

IV. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION2 Three issues were discussed : (1) concerns that flare use is excluded under proposed amendments ;

(2) concerns about the training required for conducting Method 22 monitoring ; and (3) concerns

with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements.

Possible Exclusion of Flare Use under Proposed Amendments

The following items were discussed regarding the use of flares under the proposed amendments:

• BP expressed concerns that the rule does not specifically allow the use of flares;

• EPA explained that section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) does not allow EPA to

specify what type of control technology can be used under NSPS.

• EPA suggested that BP highlight the language in the proposed amendments that was of

concern when they submit their comments.

Issues with Method 22 Monitoring

BP expressed concerns with the requirement to conduct EPA Method 22 monitoring. They were

concerned about the level of training that would be required for personnel to be able to conduct

this type of monitoring. EPA pointed to §60.5412(d)(1)(iii), which specifies that only section 11

of Method 22 applies. BP thanked EPA for clarifyin g that only section 11 of Method 22 was

applicable

.

Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements

The following recordkeeping and reporting issues were discussed:

• BP expressed some concerns about the recordkeeping and reporting requirements being

spread throughout the NSPS and not just in §60.5420. Additionally, they had concerns

that some of the requirements that were included outside of §60.5420 were repeated in

§60.5420, but were not consistent.

• EPA clarified t hat some requirements had to be kept outside of §60.5420.
#### Erich Kahn, Respondent, v. Radio City Music Hall, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6479
FRANK LIPOVSKY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. J. ROBERTS, Sheriff; LIND W. DOCTOR; LARRY WINDER, Medical Practitioner; STEPHENIE LAWLESS, Nurse; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-423-2) Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank Lipovsky, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom , 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied , 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED