alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration [Docket Nos. FDA-2012-N-0197; FDA-2017-N-1095; FDA-2011-N-0424; FDA-2017-N-2021 and FDA-2010-N-0493]
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of information collections that have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-7726, 
                        *PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov*.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a list of FDA information collections recently approved by OMB under section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). The OMB control number and expiration date of OMB approval for each information collection are shown in table 1. Copies of the supporting statements for the information collections are available on the internet at 
                    *https://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Table 1—List of Information Collections Approved by OMB
Title of collection
OMB 
                             control No.
Date approval expiresShortages Data Collection
0910-0491
05/31/2021Electronic Submission of Allegations of Regulatory Misconduct Associated with Medical Devices
0910-0769
11/30/2023( print page 85646)Temporary Marketing Permit Applications
0910-0133
12/31/2023Channels of Trade Policy for Commodities with Residues of Pesticide Chemicals for Which Tolerances Have Been Revoked, Suspended, or Modified by the EPA
0910-0562
12/31/2023Additional Criteria and Procedures for Classifying Over-the-Counter Drugs as Generally Recognized as Safe and Effective and Not Misbranded
0910-0688
12/31/2023
 Dated: December 21, 2020. Lauren K. Roth, Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.


[FR Doc. 2020-28608 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Exhibit 10.26.1



INSURANCE BINDER

This binder is a temporary insurance  contract,  subject to the conditions shown
on the reverse side of this form.

Producer:
Smith Bell & Thompson, Inc.
P.O. Box 730
102 S. Winooski Ave.
Burlington, VT 05402-0730

Company:                   Federal Insurance Co.
Date Effective:            2/24/96
Time:                      12:01 AM

Date Expiration:           04/24/96
Time:                      12:01 AM


Description of Operations: Manufacturer of Premium Ice Cream and Frozen
                           Yogurt

Insured:                   Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
                           P.O. Box 240
                           Waterbury, VT 05676

This binder is issued to extend coverage in the above named Company per expiring
                           policy No.:  8121-24-97F

Coverages:
Executive Liability & Defense Coverage:                $7,500,000;
                                                       $  500,000 Ded./Org.
Fiduciary liability & Defense Coverage:                $1,000,000;
                                                       Nil Deductible
Commercial Crime Coverage:                             $  500,000;
                                                       $   10,000 Deductible
Kidnap/Ransom & Extortion Coverage:                    $1,000,000;
                                                       Nil Deductible

Agreed Allocation Endorsement: 80%/20%


CONDITIONS

This Company binds the kinds of insurance  stipulated on the preceding page. The
Insurance is subject to the terms, conditions and limitations of the policies in
current use by the Company.


<PAGE>


This binder may be  cancelled  by the Insured by  surrender of this binder or by
written notice to the Company stating when cancellation will be effective.  This
binder may be  cancelled  by the Company by notice to the Insured in  accordance
with the policy  conditions.  This binder is cancelled when replace by a policy.
If this binder is not replaced by a policy,  the Company is entitled to charge a
premium for the binder according to the Rules and Rates in use by the Company.

APPLICABLE IN NEVADA

Any person who refuses to accept a binder which  provides  coverage of less than
$1,000,000.00 when proof is required:  (a) Shall be fined not more than $500.00,
and (B) is liable to the party  presenting  the binder as proof of insurance for
actual damages sustained therefrom.





<PAGE>
F3C

C C

CF3

H H
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Union Agreements in the Airframe Industry, 1944

              																	Kassalow, Everett M. (Everett Malcolm)					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Union Agreements in the Airframe Industry, 1944 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 792*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4267,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; R13 Conference Grant Applications.                    

*Date:*                         February 25, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jian Yang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7111, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7799,                         *yangj@extra.niddk.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 23, 2020. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-28935 Filed 12-30-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1291 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1291

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 12, 2024.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Kennedy.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                       20,664,264 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                11,033,758 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             31,698,022 
<PP&E>                       81,443,065 
<DEPRECIATION>               31,766,188 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              174,989,293 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>       137,463,717 
<BONDS>                     100,932,989 
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                  (80,575,338)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>174,989,293 
<SALES>                      26,916,089 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             28,496,327 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                19,711,618 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             13,251,199 
<LOSS-PROVISION>             26,000,000 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           23,796,808 
<INCOME-PRETAX>             (54,263,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         (49,291,781)
<DISCONTINUED>               12,665,186 
<EXTRAORDINARY>              35,222,897 
<CHANGES>                   (30,000,000)
<NET-INCOME>                (31,403,748)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (64.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (64.72)

        


</TABLE>
#### § 21.435 Must DoD Components formally select and appoint grants officers and agreements officers?

Yes, each DoD Component that awards grants or enters into cooperative agreements must have a formal process (see § 21.425) for selecting and appointing grants officers and for terminating their appointments. Similarly, each DoD Component that awards or administers technology investment agreements must have a process for selecting and appointing agreements officers and for terminating their appointments.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed August 10, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-11-00405-CV 

WILLIAM BRYAN ADAMS AND BA ACQUISITIONS, LLC, Appellants 

V. 

STAXXRING, INC. AND MOLLY LANGFORD, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-07879-D 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

The Court REINSTATES the appeal. 

On January 17, 2012, we abated this appeal due to the filing of bankruptcy by appellees. 

In response to our July 7, 2015 letter inquiring about the status of the bankruptcy proceedings, 

appellants filed a letter stating the bankruptcy proceedings have been closed and that the parties 

reached a settlement agreement. Appellants state the appeal should be dismissed. We will treat 

the letter as a motion to dismiss the appeal. As such, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

110405F.P05 

 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

WILLIAM BRYAN ADAMS AND BA 

ACQUISITIONS, LLC, Appellants 

No. 05-11-00405-CV V. 

STAXXRING, INC. AND MOLLY 

LANGFORD, Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-07879-D. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, 

Justices Lang-Miers and Whitehill 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. Subject to 

any agreement between the parties, we ORDER that appellees Staxxring, Inc. and Molly 

Langford recover their costs of this appeal from appellant William Bryan Adams and BA 

Acquisitions, LLC. 

Judgment entered August 10, 2015.
§ 1903.7 Trespassing. ( a ) Entering, or remaining on any Agency installation without proper authorization is prohibited. Failure to obey an order to leave given under this section by an authorized person, or reentry or attempted reentry onto the Agency installation after being ordered to leave or after being instructed not to reenter by an authorized person under this section is also prohibited.
( b ) Any person who violates the provisions of this part may be ordered to leave the Agency installation by an authorized person. A violator's reentry may also be prohibited.
CTRL-a to begin

ESC to stop

6.72 6.72 6.74 6.74 6.73 6.72 6.72 6.72 6.74 6.74 6.73 V 

# 116°F Continuous temperature and flow display6.11 6.13 6.15 6.14 6.14 6.13 6.12 6.14 6.14 6.13 6.13 V 

# 38.3 ft/s Continuous temperature and flow displayMassena West Pretest Anemometer Data 4/22/13



## 45.99590168 Vd Desired velocity in Duct in Method 14 room (ft/sec) 

## 1.416666667 Dn Diameter of a roof monitor nozzle (ft) 

## 1.229 Dd Diameter of a duct at sampling location (ft) 

## 4.32828 Vm Average velocity of the air stream in roof vents for 36hr period before test (ft/sec) 2.9511 Vm Average velocity of the air stream in roof vents for 36 hr period before test (mph)
* To use, enter the new average Vm from anemometers
Date: 4-22-13 TF MW and the spreadsheet automatically recalculates a new **A = 0.30** desired duct velocity. **B = 0.23**

**Preliminary adjustment of velocity**

delta P across entire traverse (0.62, 0.61, 0.66, 0.62, 0.60, 0.60, 0.62, 0.68, 0.68, 0.62, 0.52, 0.48) AVG = 0.609

Ts = 551 R Vs = KpCp(sqrt delta P avg) X sqrt (Ts/Ps X Ms) Ps = 29.75 + 0.22 = 29.97 Ms = 28.84 Vs = (85.49)(0.84)(sqrt 0.609) X sqrt (551 / (29.97)(28.84)) Kp = 85.49 Cp = 0.84 **Vs = 45.2 ft/sec**
Exhibit 32.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Sbarro, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended  December 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Michael  O'Donnell,
Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  March 29, 2004

/s/ Michael O'Donnell
---------------------
Michael O'Donnell
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


NOTE: A signed original of this  certification  has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, William E. Nixon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AccuPoll Holding Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


September 28, 2005                          /s/ William E. Nixon
                                            -----------------------
                                            William E. Nixon
                                            Chief Executive Officer
(April 26, 1978)

#### In the Matter of the People of the State of New York et al., Petitioners, v Edward S. Conway, as Justice of the Supreme Court, Respondent.

Application by petitioners pursuant to CPLR article 78, to vacate ex parte order to show cause granted by the respondent Justice of the Supreme Court on April 24, 1978. Although brought in the form of an article 78 proceeding, we treat this application as a motion pursuant to CPLR 5704 (subd [a]) which empowers the Appellate Division to vacate orders of the Supreme Court granted without notice to the adverse party. While such power should be exercised by this court only in unusual circumstances (see *Matter of Willmark Serv. System,*21 AD2d 478; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5704.04), we deem the instant case, which concerns ongoing criminal prosecutions by the Statewide Organized Crime Task Force, to be a proper one in which to act. Turning to the order to show cause in question, we note initially that the stay contained therein was improperly granted since the required notice was not given to the petitioners *(Matter of McArdle,*41 AD2d 401). More importantly, the Supreme Court was without authority to entertain this matter which, in essence, seeks relief in the nature of prohibition against an Acting Supreme Court Justice and which, as defendants’ attorneys admit, should have been commenced in this court in the first instance (CPLR 506, subd [b]; see *Matter of Snee v County Ct. of County of Cayuga,*31 AD2d 303, 308). These considerations alone would justify the granting of the instant motion. We would add, however, that we disagree with defendants’ substantive argument that this court could not delegate authority to the Third District Administrative Judge to make the temporary assignment here in issue (see 22 NYCRR 840.3). Such a delegation of authority, sanctioned by section 216 of the Judiciary Law is proper (cf. *Matter of Seidenberg v County Ct. of County of Rockland,*34 NY2d 499, 506) and in our opinion is not violative of article VI (§26, subd i) of the State Constitution. Also without merit is defendants’ contention that the temporary assignment of the Acting Supreme Court Justice to these cases could not exceed 30 days (see 22 NYCRR 840.3, final ordering paragraph). *1108Motion granted, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.