alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 THAT
     WERE FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000030966
<NAME>                        Erly Industries, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Aug-21-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### § 884.5 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Reclamation plan* or *State reclamation plan* means a plan that a State or Indian tribe submitted and that we approved under section 405 of SMCRA and part 884 of this chapter.

[73 FR 67642, Nov. 14, 2008]
#### § 246.7 Information requirements.

The reporting requirements in § 246.6, and appendix B to this part shall be submitted in accordance with DoD Instruction 7000.12, and 7600.6, unless specifically excepted by this part.
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00148

- CR

QUANTEL RAYSHON WAGGONER, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 7th District Court Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. 007

- 1699

- 18

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O RDER
Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, p assport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government

- issued personal identification number.”
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record includes a social security number. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper for m or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 2 8 , 2020
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10-k-2


         Amendment No. 1 to the Capacity & Reservation Deposit Agreement

This Amendment No. 1 to the Capacity & Reservation Deposit Agreement dated March
24, 2000 ("Effective Date") is entered by and between Conexant Systems, Inc., a
company incorporated in Delaware ("Conexant") and UMC Group (USA) ("UMC"),
(collectively the "Parties") for foundry services to be performed by United
Microelectronics Corporation.

Background

On March 20th, 2000 the Parties entered the Capacity & Reservation Deposit
Agreement (the "Agreement") whereby UMC shall provide certain foundry services
to Conexant in accordance with the Agreement terms. The Parties agree certain
terms of the Agreement require clarification. This Amendment intends to provide
such clarification.

Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, Conexant and UMC agree that the Agreement is amended as
follows:


New Section 5.3 reads:

      5.3 In the event of a breach of a material obligation which is not cured
      or otherwise resolved pursuant to subsections a, b or c of Section 5.2
      above:

      (a)   If the breach specified in the Default Notice is (i) attributable to
            Conexant and (ii) not disputed, then UMC is entitled to retain the
            entire remaining unused portion of the Deposit; or

      (b)   If the breach specified in the Default Notice is (i) attributable to
            UMC and not disputed, then Conexant is entitled to retain the entire
            remaining unused portion of the Deposit, which shall be remitted to
            Conexant within thirty (30) days of request therefor.

The following language is appended to Section 4.3:

In the event that the foundry agreement is not entered and either party elects
to terminate this Agreement for convenience for that reason, Conexant shall be
entitled to receive, within 30 days of such termination, a full refund, without
interest, of the unused portion of the Deposit.

Except as specifically modified herein, all terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

By:    /s/ Jim Kupec                            By:    /s/ Terry Ellis
       -----------------------------                   -------------------------

Name:  Jim Kupec                                Name:  Terry Ellis
       -----------------------------                   -------------------------

Title: President, UMC (USA)                     Title: SVP, Operations
       -----------------------------                   -------------------------

Date:  3/24/2000                                Date:  3/24/2000
       -----------------------------                   -------------------------
EXHIBIT 10.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
    (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Tele Nordeste Celular Participacoes S.A., a
Brazilian sociedade anonima (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

         The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Form 20-F") of the Company, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto filed by
the Company on Form 20-F/A on June 8, 2004 (the "First Amendment") fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 20-F as amended by
the First Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:   June 8, 2004              By:   /s/ Mario Cesar Pereira de Araujo
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Mario Cesar Pereira de Araujo
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer


Date:   June 8, 2004              By:   /s/ Walmir Urbano Kesseli
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Walmir Urbano Kesseli
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 20-F or of the First Amendment or as a separate disclosure
document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Tele Nordeste Celular Participacoes S.A. and will be
retained by Tele Nordeste Celular Participacoes S.A. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Alpha T. Dunn and another *vs.*Percival Barton.

May 2, 1889.

Contract — Prevention of Performance — Damages.—Findings of fact examined, and *held*to be insufficient to justify the judgment ordered by the trial court and entered thereon.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of St. Paul in favor of the plaintiff James M. Hutchinson. The complaint alleges a written contract between the plaintiff Dunn and the defendant, by which the former agreed to do certain cement-work *416and plastering for the latter, at the agreed price of $125 for the cement-work and specified rates per yard for the plastering. It further alleges full performance of all the work and acceptance by defendant,, except that defendant prevented Dunn from doing part of the cement-work, which he was willing and ready to do. • It also alleges an assignment to plaintiff Hutchinson of the amount due Dunn under the contract, and demands judgment for the contract price, less payments made. The answer alleged, among other things, full payment for the work actually done, and a counterclaim for damages for inferior work, etc. The action was tried by the court, who found the allegations of the complaint to be true, and ordered judgment against defendant for $90.73, including the amount unpaid of the contract price of the cement-work.

*S. G. Olmstead,*for appellant.

*Hutchinson & Pike,*for respondents.

Collins, J.

It is admitted in the complaint herein that the written contract between plaintiff’s assignor and the defendant, a copy of which is made a part of the pleading, was not fully completed, because it is alleged the defendant refused to allow the work (cementing a cellar for a stated sum of money) to be finished. There is no averment in the pleading under which plaintiff could be permitted to show the difference between the contract price and what it would have cost his assignor to have performed the contract, together with such sums of money as the contractor had expended for materials which had gone into the work prior to defendant’s refusal to allow it to proceed; nor was there any finding whatsoever upon the amount of damages suffered by the contractor by reason of defendant’s conduct. The court below evidently held the contract price to be the measure of damages, and ordered judgment accordingly. This was erroneous. *Glaspie*v. *Glassow,*28 Minn. 158, (9 N. W. Rep. 669;) *Pevey*v. *Schulenburg, etc., Lumber Co.,*33 Minn. 45, (21 N. W. Rep. 844.) The findings were defective in this regard, and a judgment based upon insufficient findings cannot be sustained. *Benjamin*v. *Levy,*39 Minn. 11, (38 N. W. Rep. 702,) and cases cited. It is quite apparent from the evidence that but few dollars are involved in this appeal, for the plaintiff’s assignor had nearly • completed the work *417upon the cellar when ordered to desist by defendant. For that reason we are of the opinion that the prevailing party should not be allowed statutory costs in this court; and it is so ordered.

Judgment reversed.

ÍTote. A motion for reargument of this case was denied May 11, 1889.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6829]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eighteenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight 
Visions Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of meeting RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight 
Visions Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
eighteenth meeting of RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight 
Visions Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

DATES: The meeting will be held April 17-19, 2012, from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 213. The agenda will 
include the following:

April 17, 2012

 Introductions and administrative items
 Review and approve minutes from last full plenary meeting
 Review and approve updated terms of reference for submittal to 
PMC
 Review SVS/CVS (WG1) and Vision Systems (WG2) objectives
 Work Group 2 (VS) Discussion

April 18, 2012

 Work Group 2 (VS) Discussion
 Work Group 1 (SVS/CVS) break discussion out if needed

April 19, 2012

 Work Group 1 and 2 Update
 Administrative items (action item review and meeting 
schedule--July 17-19 DC, September/October Europe)
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 15, 2012.
John Raper,
Manager, Business Operations Branch, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-6829 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
# FORM
6-K

SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

# Report of
Foreign Issuer

# Pursuant to
Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of

# Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

For the month
of February 2005

ABBEY NATIONAL
PLC (Translation of registrant's name into English)

Abbey National
House, 2 Triton Square, Regent's PlaceLondon NW1 3AN, England
   (Address of principal executive offices)

|Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
      under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . . Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
      contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
      Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934.  Yes . . . . . . . No . . .X. .
.. .


---



**Abbey Board Changes**

Further to the announcement on 22 December 2004, Angus Porter, Executive Director, Customer Propositions, will be resigning from the Abbey Board with immediate effect. He will remain at Abbey in a management capacity until 24 March 2005 to help with the transition of the Customer Propositions and Sales Divisions to Graeme Hardie the new Executive Director, Sales and Marketing.



**Media enquiries:**

Christina Mills, Abbey Media Relations. Tel: 020 7756 4212
  Matt Young, Abbey Media Relations. Tel: 020 7756 4232



---

# SIGNATURES

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.

|                                       |  | **ABBEY NATIONAL
      PLC**                 
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|**Date:


    **25th February 2005**** |  | **By: /s/





    ******Jason Wright********
|                                       |  | **(Authorised Signatory)**************
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors
Cyanotech Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 33-63789, 33-55310 and 333-42484 on Form S-8 and
333-42486 and 33-101401 on Form S-3 of Cyanotech Corporation of our report dated April 30, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Cyanotech Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2004, which report is included in the 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Cyanotech Corporation. We
also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 30, 2004 with respect to the financial statement schedule of Cyanotech Corporation and subsidiaries in the
aforementioned 2004 annual report of Form 10-K, which report is included in said Form 10-K.

/s/
KPMG LLP
Honolulu, Hawaii
June 28th, 2004

---



QuickLinks
§ 196.530 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *General.* A recipient shall not apply any policy or take any employment action: ( 1 ) Concerning the potential marital, parental, or family status of an employee or applicant for employment that treats persons differently on the basis of sex; or
( 2 ) Which is based upon whether an employee or applicant for employment is the head of household or principal wage earner in such employee's or applicant's family unit.
( b ) *Pregnancy.* A recipient shall not discriminate against or exclude from employment any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom.
( c ) *Pregnancy as a temporary disability.* Subject to § 196.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, recovery therefrom, and any temporary disability resulting therefrom as any other temporary disability for all job-related purposes, including commencement, duration, and extensions of leave, payment of disability income, accrual of seniority and any other benefit or service, and reinstatement, and under any fringe benefit offered to employees by virtue of employment.
( d ) *Pregnancy leave.* In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its employees, or in the case of an employee with insufficient leave or accrued employment time to qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence without pay for a reasonable period of time, at the conclusion of which the employee shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began or to a comparable position, without decrease in rate of compensation or loss of promotional opportunities, or any other right or privilege of employment.
§ 232.1 Authority, purpose, and coverage. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued by the Department of Defense to implement 10 U.S.C. 987.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to impose limitations on the cost and terms of certain extensions of credit to Service members and their dependents, and to provide additional protections relating to such transactions in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 987.
( c ) *Coverage.* This part defines the types of transactions involving “consumer credit,” a “creditor,” and a “covered borrower” that are subject to the regulation, consistent with the provisions of 10 U.S.C. 987. In addition, this part: ( 1 ) Provides the maximum allowable amount of all charges, and the types of charges, that may be associated with a covered extension of consumer credit;
( 2 ) Requires a creditor to provide to a covered borrower a statement of the Military Annual Percentage Rate, or MAPR, before or at the time the borrower becomes obligated on the transaction or establishes an account for the consumer credit. The statement required by § 232.6(a)(1) differs from and is in addition to the disclosures that must be provided to consumers under the Truth in Lending Act;
( 3 ) Provides for the method a creditor must use in calculating the MAPR; and
( 4 ) Contains such other criteria and limitations as the Secretary of Defense has determined appropriate, consistent with the provisions of 10 U.S.C. 987.
#### JONES v. WILLIAMSBURG FIRE INS. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Action by Benjamin W. Jones against the Williamsburg Fire Insurance Company.

No opinion. Motion granted, so far as to dismiss appeal, with $10 costs.