alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<CIK>          0000031364
<NAME>         Eckerd Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000  
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Feb-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-30-1999                          
<CASH>                                              55,314
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      129,903
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,000
<INVENTORY>                                      1,269,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,456,825
<PP&E>                                             993,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                     400,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,694,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              644,873
<BONDS>                                          1,612,859
<COMMON>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         311,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,694,527
<SALES>                                          1,736,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,736,846
<CGS>                                            1,341,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,341,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   301,536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       857
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     70,637
<INCOME-TAX>                                        26,843
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 43,794
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        43,794
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1630.11 Class 1-A-0: Conscientious objector available for noncombatant military service only.

In accord with part 1636 of this chapter any registrant shall be palced in Class 1-A-0 who has been found, by reason of religious, ethical, or moral belief, to be conscientiously opposed to participation in combatant military tranining and service in the Armed Forces.
## Subpart B—Employment and Retention
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,725
<PP&E>                                          52,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,545
<BONDS>                                         24,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           871
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,904
<SALES>                                         15,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,042
<CGS>                                           11,652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (19)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    504
<INCOME-TAX>                                       211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                293
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
July 28, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EUGENE JENKINS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00409

- CV V.

FORT BEND COUNTY DIS TRICT ATTORNEY

, Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on November 17, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Eugene Jenkins.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
§ 1801.52 Criminal penalties. ( a ) *Unauthorized disclosure.* Criminal penalties may be imposed against any officer or employee of NACIC who, by virtue of employment, has possession of or access to NACIC records which contain information identifiable with an individual, the disclosure of which is prohibited by the Privacy Act or by these rules, and who, knowing that disclosure of the specific material is so prohibited, willfully discloses the material in any manner to any person or agency not entitled to receive same.
( b ) *Unauthorized maintenance.* Criminal penalties may be imposed against any officer or employee of NACIC who willfully maintains a system of records without meeting the requirements of section (e)(4) of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a. The Coordinator and the Director of NACIC are authorized independently to conduct such surveys and inspect such records as necessary from time to time to ensure that these requirements are met.
( c ) *Unauthorized requests.* Criminal penalties may be imposed upon any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning an individual from NACIC under false pretenses.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuantTo 18 U.S.C. 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended March 31, 2009 as amended with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew H. Jacobson,Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1)                 The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

 

2)                 The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: July 10,  2009 | /s/ Andrew H.  Jacobson                  |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                      | Andrew H.  Jacobson,                     |
| * *                  | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |
| * *                  | *and  Director*                          |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Dixie Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary A. Harmon, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/GARY A. HARMON

Gary A. Harmon, Chief Financial Officer
Date:    May 7, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dixie Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Dixie Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 203.17 Technical assistance provider reporting requirements.

Each technical assistance provider shall submit progress reports, financial status reports, materials prepared for the RAB/TRC, and a final report to the DoD installation for the TAPP project as specified by the specific purchase order agreement. The final report shall document TAPP project activities over the entire period of support and shall describe the achievements with respect to stated TAPP project purposes and objectives.
### §4313. Criteria for performance appraisals

Appraisals of performance in the Senior Executive Service shall be based on both individual and organizational performance, taking into account such factors as—

(1) improvements in efficiency, productivity, and quality of work or service, including any significant reduction in paperwork;

(2) cost efficiency;

(3) timeliness of performance;

(4) other indications of the effectiveness, productivity, and performance quality of the employees for whom the senior executive is responsible;

(5) meeting affirmative action goals, achievement of equal employment opportunity requirements, and compliance with the merit systems principles set forth under section 2301 of this title; and

(6) protecting whistleblowers, as described in section 4302(b)(2).

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title IV, §405(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1168; amended Pub. L. 103–424, §6, Oct. 29, 1994, 108 Stat. 4364; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1097(d)(2), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1620.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Par. (6). Pub. L. 115–91 added par. (6).

1994—Par. (5). Pub. L. 103–424 amended par. (5) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (5) read as follows: "meeting affirmative action goals and achievement of equal employment opportunity requirements."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 9 months after Oct. 13, 1978, and congressional review of provisions of sections 401 through 412 of Pub. L. 95–454, see section 415(a)(1), (b), of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 3131 of this title.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-13-00450-CV

____________________

IN RE CHAD ALLEN BELL

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

In a petition for writ of mandamus, Chad Allen Bell seeks to compel the trial 

court to vacate its order of September 17, 2013, which denied Bell’s motion to 

disqualify counsel for the real parties in interest, Jeffrey Durham and Pamela 

Durham. Bell seeks an order from us requiring the trial court to disqualify counsel 

for the Durhams. The parties dispute whether a disqualification occurs when an 

associate, who never participated on a case where his employer represented the 

defendant, accepts employment by another firm that represents the plaintiff. After 

considering evidence, the trial court concluded that the associate’s change of

employment did not disqualify the associate’s new firm from representing the 
2

Durhams. After reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we conclude relator 

has not established an abuse of discretion by the trial court. See In re Guar. Ins. 

Servs., Inc., 343 S.W.3d 130, 133-34 (Tex. 2011); Henderson v. Floyd, 891 

S.W.2d 252 (Tex. 1995). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and 

motion for temporary relief are denied.

PETITION DENIED.

 PER CURIAM 

Opinion Delivered October 24, 2013

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
gpo91891
### §50505. Test facilities

(a) Charges.—The Administrator shall establish a policy of charging users of the Administration's test facilities for the costs associated with their tests at a level that is competitive with alternative test facilities. The Administrator shall not implement a policy of seeking full cost recovery for a facility until at least 30 days after transmitting a notice to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.

(b) Funding Account.—In planning and budgeting, the Administrator shall establish a funding account that shall be used for all test facilities. The account shall be sufficient to maintain the viability of test facilities during periods of low utilization.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3407.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50505 | 42 U.S.C. 16634. | Pub. L. 109–155, title II, §205, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2916. |

Section

This section restates provisions originally enacted as part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–155, 119 Stat. 2895), and not as part of title V of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–588, 106 Stat. 5107), which is generally restated in this chapter.

In subsection (a), the words "Committee on Science and Technology" are substituted for "Committee on Science" on authority of Rule X(1)(o) of the Rules of the House of Representatives, adopted by House Resolution No. 6 (110th Congress, January 5, 2007).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
### [§§5591 to 5594. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–83, §1(34)(B), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 201]

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section deletes sections 5591, 5592, 5593, and 5594 of title 5, United States Code, to reflect the repeal of the source statutes of those sections by the act of March 30, 1966, Public Law 89–380, section 5, 80 Stat. 95.

[Sections, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 496, 497, related to back pay for individuals or preference eligibles reinstated or restored, and are covered by section 5596 of this title.]
^^

^

^

^

^ ^

^ ^

FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

^ Historic sites

Historic site areas

National Historic Trails

Historic Trails

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 3-1: Historic Sites

and National Historic Trails

Wyoming Sage-Grouse
### Investigations of the characteristics, origin, and residence time of the upland residual mantle of the Piedmont of Fairfax County, Virginia

By: M.J. PavichG. W. LeoS. F. ObermeierJ.R. Estabrook

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1352

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §2106. Member of Congress

For the purpose of this title, "Member of Congress" means the Vice President, a member of the Senate or the House of Representatives, a Delegate to the House of Representatives, and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 409; Pub. L. 91–405, title II, §204(b), Sept. 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 852; Pub. L. 96–54, §2(a)(7), Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 381.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

The section is supplied to avoid the necessity of defining "Member of Congress" each time the term is used in this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–54 substituted "to the House of Representatives" for "from the District of Columbia".

1970—Pub. L. 91–405 included Delegate from District of Columbia.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–54 effective July 12, 1979, see section 2(b) of Pub. L. 96–54, set out as a note under section 305 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–405 effective Sept. 22, 1970, see section 206(b) of Pub. L. 91–405, set out as an Effective Date note under section 25a of Title 2, The Congress.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of HCP, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   May 23, 2013 | /s/   TIMOTHY M. SCHOEN                                                                                     |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Timothy   M. Schoen*Executive Vice President and Chief   Financial Officer   (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HCP, Inc. and will be retained by HCP, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

 

----
### §30503. Performance assessments

(a) In General.—The performance of each division in the Science directorate of the Administration shall be reviewed and assessed by the National Academy of Sciences at 5-year intervals.

(b) Timing.—Beginning with the first fiscal year following December 30, 2005, the Administrator shall select at least one division for review under this section. The Administrator shall select divisions so that all disciplines will have received their first review within 6 fiscal years of December 30, 2005.

(c) Reports.—Not later than March 1 of each year, beginning with the first fiscal year after December 30, 2005, the Administrator shall transmit a report to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate—

(1) setting forth in detail the results of any external review under subsection (a);

(2) setting forth in detail actions taken by the Administration in response to any external review; and

(3) including a summary of findings and recommendations from any other relevant external reviews of the Administration's science mission priorities and programs.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3368.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30503 | 42 U.S.C. 16651. | Pub. L. 109–155, title III, §301, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2916. |

Section

In subsections (b) and (c), the date "December 30, 2005" is substituted for "the date of enactment of this Act" to reflect the date of enactment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–155, 119 Stat. 2895).

In subsection (c), the words "Committee on Science and Technology" are substituted for "Committee on Science" on authority of Rule X(1)(o) of the Rules of the House of Representatives, adopted by House Resolution No. 6 (110th Congress, January 5, 2007).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edwin Chase, Appellant.

Motion to enlarge time to perfect the appeal granted; appellant’s time enlarged to the January 1961 term. The appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar for said term. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant  To 18 U.S.C. 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David I. Rosenthal, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date: June 24, 2010

/s/ David I. Rosenthal David I. Rosenthal, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
and Director
(Performing the Functions of
Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks