alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate recor d, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se eFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered sub mitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### NOV 4 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
HENRY LEE McCONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, vs. WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL; JUDIE L. CHITWOOD; JUDY UPHOFF, Defendants - Appellees. No. 97-8118 (D.C. No. 97-CV-142-D) (D. Wyo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges. ** Plaintiff-Appellant Henry Lee McCone appeals from the district court’s dismissal, without prejudice, of his 42 U.S.C. §198 3 claim seeking damages and alleging violation of his constitutional rights by state officers during proceedings to revoke his parole. Our jurisdiction arises unde r 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we- 2 -

affirm. The district court was correct in determin ing that Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994), bars the present action absent a d etermination that the parole revocation was invalid. See White v. Gittens , 121 F.3d 803, 807 (1st Cir. 1997); Crow v. Penry , 102 F.3d 1086, 1087 (10th Cir. 1996). Likewise, the district court was correct in holding that, even if the complaint was construed as a habeas corpus petition, Mr. McCone had failed to exhaust s tate court remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A); see also Demarest v. Price , 130 F.3d 922, 932 (10th Cir. 1997). AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Newcastle

Yellowstone

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse RMP 

Amendments Planning Area

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

RMP Amendments Planning Area

Partuition Areas

Crucial Winter

Crucial Yearlong

Severe Winter Relief

Spring/Summer/Fall

Winter

Winter/Yearlong

Yearlong

Field Office Boundaries

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 15: Mule Deer Habitat Locations
### Geology of the Decaturville impact structure, Missouri

By: Terry W. OffieldHoward A. Pohn

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1042

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Map 2-2: Alternative D

Greater Sage Grouse Surface Disturbance/

Surface Occupancy Restrictions Related to

Greater Sage Grouse Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

Surface Disturbance Restricted

BLM and USFS Surface

Management

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: Identified restrictions displayed on this map

are in addition to existing restrictions already

approved through previous planning efforts.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 24, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 24, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0284. JUDITH LEE MCFARLAND v. JAMES ROBERT HUDSON.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2015CV146
EXHIBIT 32.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  North  American  Gaming   and
Entertainment  Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the  period  ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on  the
date hereof  (the  "Report"), I Chen Weidong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,   pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350,as  adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)    The Report fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)     The information contained in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial  condition  and  result  of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Chen Weidong
----------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


May 15, 2009
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Examining Treasury's Use of Financial Crisis Contracting Authority

              																	United States. Congressional Oversight Panel. 						*Examining Treasury's Use of Financial Crisis Contracting Authority : Congressional Oversight Panel October Oversight Report*,												Washington: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										October 14, 2010,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5145,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 107.2 Applicability and scope. ( a ) This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and the Military Departments.
( b ) It applies only to personal services contracts awarded under 10 U.S.C. 1091 for direct health care providers.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD



### !(vou make cluti!Kes 

### to the va/11es ill tlu ! /aiJ/u 

### he/ow. you 111/tst unswe the totals U[)(late**o~.:curdin ly** **.** 

### (I they do not, click (o r li.thJ into 

### wid !h un out ult/1(! 

### dwnged ce ll.
Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g. , Inspection , propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost

# "''~ (labor+ 

# u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include on- access , testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered condition costs here and close-up) our) Products 

### Inspection 8.0 $01:>00

### ~-1lt~ 12 

## <t**~.J· ~** 

# ~ JLL**<~:n** 1")**"'![<~** ....... _

The known number of products in compliance: 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S

. fleet: $8,262 Costs covered under wan·anty Ulknown) $0

On-Condition Costs: · • Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g. , Inspection , (include access , (@$85/hour)**replaceme ~** **J,J,.~.~** testing , and close# ~/~0 up) 

### l l

... a.llc.ftM. "t_ ...I. .b.

.... 

## .::;**~-·** 

## z,., 

## m>()**'U>.LI~!> 8.~1:f\N.**  

### ;E,r(L**~r,.,p. ~** **~ v~t>**  

## C\. ,BO**~** 

# 1uo

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thisfield to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### **The doubler installation labor and part costs have been requested from Boeing and will be provided when they are available 

# -

### Executive Order 12866:
Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action ' '?

- YES* 

# 0 NO 

### 1:8] *Explanation : 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:
Is the AD significant?

- YES* 

# 0 NO 

### 1:8] *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. .

# , YES 

# 0 NO 

## [8J Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? • YES* 

# 0 NO 

## [8J *Explanation:
§ 1901.63 Specific exemptions. Pursuant to authority granted in section (k) of the Privacy Act, the Director of Central Intelligence has determined to exempt from section (d) of the Privacy Act those portions and only those portions of all systems of records maintained by the CIA that would consist of, pertain to, or otherwise reveal information that is: ( a ) Classified pursuant to Executive Order 12958 (or successor or prior Order) and thus subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1) and 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1);
( b ) Investigatory in nature and compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the scope of section (j)(2) of the Act; provided however, that if an individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit to which they are otherwise eligible, as a result of the maintenance of such material, then such material shall be provided to that individual except to the extent that the disclosure would reveal the identity of a source who furnished the information to the United States Government under an express promise of confidentiality, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise of confidentiality;
( c ) Maintained in connection with providing protective services to the President of the United States or other individuals pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3056;
( d ) Required by statute to be maintained and used solely as statistical records;
( e ) Investigatory in nature and compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for federal civilian employment, military service, federal contracts, or access to classified information, but only to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the United States Government under an express promise of confidentiality, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise of confidentiality;
( f ) Testing or examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the federal service the disclosure of which would compromise the objectivity or fairness of the testing or examination process; or
( g ) Evaluation material used to determine potential for promotion in the armed services, but only to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the United States Government under an express promise of confidentiality, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise of confidentiality.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER








18 U.S.C.
1350 Certification of Lawrence J. Zigerelli


President
and Chief Executive Officer


of


Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Duckwall-ALCO Stores,
Inc. and Subsidiaries, a Kansas corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter
ended May 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:




(a)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and;




(b)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.  and Subsidiaries and will be retained by
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  June
11, 2009




By:     /s/
Lawrence J. Zigerelli


Lawrence
J. Zigerelli


President
and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3538-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-3538-EM), dated August 23, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued September 11, 2020.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective August 27, 2020.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2020-28739 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
§ 225.5 Responsibilities. DIRECTOR, DeCA. Under the authority, direction, and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs, the Director, DeCA: ( a ) Establishes processes and updates systems necessary to collect and deposit with U.S. Treasury, user fees related to commercial debit/credit card use in commissaries in accordance with section 225.6 of this part.
( b ) Implements commissary credit/debit card user fee requirements.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130576 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130576 COA: 256497 Wayne CC: 03-013080-01 ASKIA HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1982—Pub. L. 97–221, §2(a)(1), July 23, 1982, 96 Stat. 227, added subchapter I heading so as to designate existing provisions as "SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS".
§ 1904.3 Procedures governing acceptance of service of process. ( a ) *Service of Process Upon the CIA or a CIA Employee in An Official Capacity* — ( 1 ) *Personal service.* Unless otherwise expressly authorized by the General Counsel, or designee, personal service of process may be accepted only by attorneys of the Office of General Counsel at CIA Headquarters in Langley, Virginia.
( 2 ) *Mail service.* Where service of process by registered or certified mail is authorized by law, unless expressly directed otherwise by the General Counsel or designee, such process may only be accepted by attorneys of the Office of General Counsel. Process by mail should be addressed as follows: Litigation Division, Office of General Counsel, Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, DC 20505.
( b ) *Service of Process Upon a CIA Employee Solely in An Individual Capacity* — ( 1 ) *General.* Consistent with section 6 of the CIA Act of 1949, as amended, 50 U.S.C. 403g, CIA will not provide the name or address of any current or former employee of CIA to individuals or entities seeking to serve process upon such employee solely in his or her individual capacity, even where the matter is related to CIA activities.
( 2 ) *Personal Service.* Subject to the sole discretion of appropriate officials of the CIA, process servers generally will not be allowed to enter CIA facilities or premises for the purpose of serving process upon any CIA employee solely in his or her individual capacity. The Office of General Counsel is not authorized to accept service of process on behalf of a CIA employee—except the Director and Deputy Director of Central Intelligence—in his or her individual capacity.
( 3 ) *Mail Service.* Unless otherwise expressly authorized by the General Counsel, or designee, CIA personnel are not authorized to accept or forward mailed service of process directed to any CIA employee in his or her individual capacity. Any such process will be returned to the sender via appropriate postal channels.
( c ) *Service of Process Upon a CIA Employee in A Combined Official and Individual Capacity.* Unless expressly directed otherwise by the General Counsel, or designee, any process to be served upon a CIA employee in his or her combined official and individual capacity, in person or by mail, can be accepted only by attorneys of the Office of General Counsel at CIA Headquarters in Langley, Virginia.
( d ) The documents for which service is accepted in official capacity only shall be stamped “Service Accepted in Official Capacity Only.” Acceptance of service of process shall not constitute an admission or waiver with respect to jurisdiction, propriety of service, improper venue, or any other defense in law or equity available under the laws or rules applicable to the service of process.