Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 30, 2020 / Proposed Rules 86527 

alter EPA’s right to take enforcement 

actions, as appropriate. The NPL is 

designed primarily for informational 

purposes and to assist EPA 

management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of 

the NCP states that the deletion of a site 

from the NPL does not preclude 

eligibility for future response actions, 

should future conditions warrant such 

actions. 

IV. Basis for Partial Site Deletion 

The site to be partially deleted from 

the NPL, the location of the site, and 

docket number with information 

including reference documents with the 

rationale and data principally relied 

upon by the EPA to determine that the 

Superfund response is complete are 

specified in Table 1. The NCP permits 

activities to occur at a deleted site or 

that media or parcel of a partially 

deleted site, including operation and 

maintenance of the remedy, monitoring, 

and five-year reviews. These activities 

for the site are entered in Table 1, if 

applicable, under Footnote such that; 

1 = site has continued operation and 

maintenance of the remedy, 2 = site 

receives continued monitoring, and 3 = 

site five-year reviews are conducted. 

TABLE 1 

Site name City/county, state Type Docket No. Footnote 

North Penn—Area 6 ...................... Lansdale, PA ................................ Partial ................ EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0008 ..... 1, 2, 3 

Table 2 includes a description of the 

area, media or Operable Units (OUs) of 

the NPL site proposed for partial 

deletion from the NPL, and an email 

address to which public comments may 

be submitted if the commenter does not 

comment using https://

www.regulations.gov. 

TABLE 2 

Site name Media/parcels for partial deletion Email address for 

public comments 

North Penn—Area 6 ............................. 1.66-acres soil and groundwater of the Second Administrative Parcel, 135 

East Hancock Street.

Ngo.huu@epa.gov. 

EPA maintains the NPL as the list of 

sites that appear to present a significant 

risk to public health, welfare, or the 

environment. Deletion from the NPL 

does not preclude further remedial 

action. Whenever there is a significant 

release from a site deleted from the NPL, 

the deleted site may be restored to the 

NPL without application of the hazard 

ranking system. Deletion of a site from 

the NPL does not affect responsible 

party liability in the unlikely event that 

future conditions warrant further 

actions. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous 

substances, Hazardous waste, 

Intergovernmental relations, Natural 

resources, Oil pollution, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Superfund, Water 

pollution control, Water supply. 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 

9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 

2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 

3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 

FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193. 

Dated: December 18, 2020. 

Dana Stalcup, 

Acting Office Director, Office of Superfund 

Remediation and Technology Innovation. 

[FR Doc. 2020–28839 Filed 12–29–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 20–428; RM–11870; DA 20– 

1487; FRS 17346] 

Television Broadcasting Services: 

Columbia, Missouri 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commission has before it 

a petition for rulemaking filed by The 

Curators of the University of Missouri 

(the University), licensee of KOMU–TV, 

channel 8, Columbia, Missouri, 

requesting the substitution of channel 

27 for channel 8 at Columbia in the DTV 

Table of Allotments. The University 

states that the Commission has 

recognized that VHF channels have 

certain propagation characteristics 

which may cause reception issues for 

some viewers. The University states that 

since the end of the DTV transition in 

2009, the station regularly receives 

complaints from viewers who report 

being able to receive all other signals in 

the market, including a low power 

television station operating on a UHF 

channel, but not KOMU–TV. While 

KOMU–TV’s proposed channel 27 

facility would result in a slight 

reduction of service to existing viewers, 

the University demonstrates that only 

401 people are predicted to live in 

portions of the loss area, and that all but 

seven of those persons will continue to 

be served by at least five full power 

television stations. The Commission has 

found that population loss of less than 

500 persons is de minimus and the 

predicted population loss as presented 

by the University is only 401 persons 

and virtually all of them will continue 

to be well-served by five other full 

power television stations. 

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before January 29, 2021 and reply 

comments on or before February 16, 

2021. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 45 

L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. In 

addition to filing comments with the 

FCC, interested parties should serve 

counsel for petitioner as follows: Lauren 

Lynch Flick, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop 

Shaw Pittman LLP, 1200 Seventeenth 

Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at (202) 

418–1647; or Joyce Bernstein, Media 

Bureau, at Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 

20–428; RM–11870; DA 20–1487, 

adopted December 16, 2020, and 

released December 16, 2020. The full 

text of this document is available for 

download at https://www.fcc.gov/edocs. 

86528 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 30, 2020 / Proposed Rules 

To request materials in accessible 

formats (braille, large print, computer 

diskettes, or audio recordings), please 

send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or call 

the Consumer & Government Affairs 

Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (VOICE), (202) 

418–0432 (TTY). 

This document does not contain 

information collection requirements 

subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

proposed information collection burden 

‘‘for small business concerns with fewer 

than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the 

Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601– 

612, do not apply to this proceeding. 

Members of the public should note 

that all ex parte contacts are prohibited 

from the time a Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking is issued to the time the 

matter is no longer subject to 

Commission consideration or court 

review, see 47 CFR 1.1208. There are, 

however, exceptions to this prohibition, 

which can be found in § 1.1204(a) of the 

Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.1204(a). 

See §§ 1.415 and 1.420 of the 

Commission’s rules for information 

regarding the proper filing procedures 

for comments, 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Television. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Thomas Horan, 

Chief of Staff, Media Bureau. 

Proposed Rule 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR 

part 73 as follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303, 

307, 309, 310, 334, 336, and 339. 

§ 73.622 [Amended] 

■ 2. Amend § 73.622(i), the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments 

under Missouri, by removing channel 8 

and adding channel 27 at Columbia. 

[FR Doc. 2020–28613 Filed 12–29–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P