alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

U.S.C. Section 1350,

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Mark C. McIntosh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2008                          
|                                            
|/s/ Mark C. McIntosh                        
|Mark C. McIntosh                            
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Collection Activity

Number of 

Respondents

Number of 

Responses 

per Party

Total 

Number of 

Responses

Time per 

Response

Cost per 

Response 

(Dollars) Total Hours

Total Cost 

(Dollars)

80.1431 - Recordkeeping to reflect invalid RINs 45 1 45 0.5 35.5 22.5 1597.5

80.1432 - Recordkeeping to reflect "spilled" RINs 45 1 45 0.25 17.75 11.25 798.75

80.1441 - small refinery exemption

(b)(2) verification letter 25 1 25 4 284 100 7100

(e)(2) extension petition (economic hardship) 25 1 25 4 284 100 7100

80.1442(b) - small refiner status letter 25 1 25 4 284 100 7100

80.1442(d) - written notice to waive exemption 2 1 2 4 284 8 568

80.1450 - Registration

(a) at $71/hour 450 1 450 8 568 3600 255600

80.1454 - Recordkeeping 450 365 164250 0.25 17.75 41062.5 2915437.5

80 1451(a) and 80.1452 - Reporting

Annual compliance reporting 450 1 450 4 284 1800 127800

Real time batch reporting (EMTS) 450 365 164250 0.25 17.75 41062.5 2915437.5

RIN transaction reports (quarterly) 450 4 1800 1 71 1800 127800

RIN activity reports (quarterly) 450 4 1800 1 71 1800 127800

80.1453 - PTD 450 365 164250 0.25 17.75 41062.5 2915437.5

80.1464 - Attest engagement (at $142/hour) 450 1 450 24 3408 10800 1533600

CDX Registration 450 1 450 2 142 900 63900

TOTALS 4217 498317 144229.25 11007076.75

Information Collection Burden by Type of Party

Table III - "Obligated Parties" (Including Refiners and Exporters or Renewable Fuels) [Assumes 150 refiners and 100 exporters.]
§ 246.1 Purpose. This part: ( a ) Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for the S&S organizations owned by designated Unified Commands consistent with 32 CFR part 372.
( b ) Supersedes policies and procedures in 32 CFR part 247 about the S&S newspapers.
( c ) Authorizes the establishment, management, operation, and oversight of the Stars and Stripes, including the resale of commercial publications necessary to support the overall S&S mission, production, distribution authority, and business operations as mission-essential activities of the Department of Defense and the designated Unified Commands.
( d ) Designates the Secretary of the Army as the DoD Executive Agent for providing administrative and logistical support to the American Forces Information Service (AFIS), designated Unified Commands, and the S&S.
( e ) Authorizes the Commander in Chief, U.S. European Command, and the Commander in Chief (CINC), U.S. Pacific Command, to establish and maintain a S&S board of directors to address S&S business operations in their Unified Commands.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's SEC Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                            3808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   431881
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4897
<INVENTORY>                                     747012
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1237914
<PP&E>                                         1270411
<DEPRECIATION>                                  575747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2466820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           497586
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         62702
<OTHER-SE>                                      983983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2466820
<SALES>                                        1693127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1693127
<CGS>                                          1280394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   301062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  94950
<INCOME-TAX>                                     33232
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              61718
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     61718
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
        

</TABLE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 8, 2006

|MS Structured Asset Corp.                         
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

|Delaware                                        | 333-64879                 | 13-4026700                        
|----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                                               
|(State or Other Jurisdiction  of Incorporation) | (Commission File  Number) | (IRS Employer  Identification No.)



|1585 Broadway, Second Floor  New York, New York  Attention: Madhu Philips | 10036     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------
|                                                                         
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                                  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

|Not Applicable                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





---









|Section 9 | Financial Statements and Exhibits
|--------- | ---------------------------------



|Item 9.01 |  | Financial Statements and Exhibits
|--------- |  | ---------------------------------

| | Exhibit 23.1 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
| | ------------ | --------------------------------



---





SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.

Date: February 15, 2006

| | MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.(Registrant)                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:/s/ Madhu Philips
      Name: Madhu PhilipsTitle: Vice President



---



EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit 23.1         Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

---
1 ... S ee Te x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 0 8 - 2 7 7 - CV ALL AN C. TATE AND DEB T ATE APPE L L AN TS SPE NC ER V . LAR RI SO N CO N STR U C TI O N , I N C . A PPELL EES A N D SA FECO I N SU RA N C E COMP ANYOFAME R I CA

----- ----- -- FR O M THE 342ND DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- -- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1 

### ANDJUDG MENT

----- ----- -- A ppe l l ant s A l l an C . Tat e and D eb Tat e Spenc erf i l ed a n ot i ceofap pea l of t het r i a l c ou rt ’ s f i na l j ud gm e ntd a t e d M a r c h 27, 2008 . On J a nu a r y 21, 2009 , t hi s courtgr ant ed t he “M ot i on to W i th d r aw A s C oun sel ” f i l ed by A ppel l ant s’ c o u n s e l a n d o rd e re d th a t A p p e l l a n ts ’ b ri e f b e d u e M a rc h 9 , 2 0 0 9 . O n F e b ru a ry2 ... A p p e l l a n ts a l so elec ted n o t t o fi l e an ap p e l l a te b ri e f. 2 11 , 20 09 , A ppel l ant s, act i ng pr o se, n ot i f i ed t hi s courtby a si gned l et t ert hat t he y “el ec t t o no t . . . pu r su e an app ea l of t hi s c a s e .” 2W e c o n s t r u e t h is do c u m e n t a s a m o t i o n t o d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l p u r s u a n t t o Te x a s Rul e o f A ppel l at e Pr ocedu r e 42 . 1( a) ( 1) . Tex . R. A pp. P. 42 . 1( a) ( 1) . H avi ng con si der ed t he m ot i on, i ti s t he cou rt ’ s opi ni on t hatt he m ot i on shou l d begr ant ed; th e re fo re , w e d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l . S ee T e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .1 (a )(1 ), 4 3 .2 (f). C os t s oft he app ea l s hal l be i ncu r r ed by t he part y i ncu r r i ng t he sa m e, f or w hi c h l e te xe c ut i on i s s ue . Se e Te x. R. App . P. 43. 4.

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: M EI ER, J. ; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d M C C O Y, J. DEL I VERE D: J un e 18, 2009
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 8, 2020

NO. 03-19-00525-CV

M. H., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order of termination signed by the trial court on July 19, 2019. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s order but that there are clerical errors requiring correction. 

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s order to replace the word “mother” with “father”

in Paragraphs 7.2.3. and 7.2.4. of the order. The Court affirms the order as modified. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1409-G

Areal extent of phreatophytes and location of cells having discharge by evapotranspiration— PLATE 2

Base from U.S. Geological Survey

113°00"
COLYMNS
1 5 10 15 20. 25
1 et
V
Bp = T2458.
5 E ee eee
= ;
Pe }— 38°40"
a a a
L
T.258.
|
1
é on me Mit-AREEOpNTY
& + CEpNTY
fe)
§ 2
g S
= 15 ie
& 2
> &
fe UI -
38°30! 7 . = vi
y
ny |
2
(0) set a2)
~fe— = Bc vee rd ES ns
25 t Gi PEAK
SS
F z
30 E a
t =
q S
38°20' hs % Z5e8 ae
35 ett
emma
40 \\
a Ss.
45
I = = [J rR
= l=
LY a cz Tt
50 P| Pret .
|_—}—} i IN
1 T
Caml
err ee i a 4
( DN woboaty A
| Y
si)
113°00"
113°10°
R.13 W. R12W. R.11W. R.10W. ROW.
5 0 5 10 MILES:

Richfield, Utah 1:250,000,
1953, revised 1972

a

5

° 5

10 KILOMETERS

Mason, J. L., Ground-water hydrology and simulated effects of
development in the Milford area, an arid basin in southwestem Utah

EXPLANATION

| Cell having discharge by evapotranspiration

[) men

Boundary of study area

——— Boundary of phreatophytes mapped in 1971—

From Mower and Cordova (1974, pl. 3)

Map showing areal extent of phreatophytes and location of cells in the ground-water flow
model having discharge by evapotranspiration, Milford area, southwestern Utah

By

James L. Mason

1998
#### § 1602.14 Local board.

A local board or a panel thereof of the Selective Service System is a group of not less than three civilian members appointed by the President after nomination by a Governor to act on cases of registrants in accord with the provisions of part 1648 of this chapter.

[52 FR 24454, July 1, 1987]
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 125 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri (for himself and Mr. LARSEN of Washington) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure in the One Hundred 

Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 

4 and Infrastructure (hereafter in this resolution referred 

5 to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff 

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $21,766,388 for the One 

9 Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 125 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $10,883,194 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2023, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

7 (2) not more than $10,883,194 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2024, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2025. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT 12.1****DUQUESNE LIGHT HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES****Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred and Preference Stock DividendRequirements**                           (Millions of Dollars)   Six Months Ended      June 30,  Year Ended December 31,   **2006**  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001    **Fixed Charges:**                        Interest on long-term debt **$****29.9**  $54.2  $55.2  $53.1  $55.3  $62.3 Other interest  **3.0**   1.1   2.0   12.3   13.3   25.6 Portion of lease payments representingan interest factor  **1.8**   3.1   3.9   4.9   3.2   3.1 Dividend requirement (a)  **4.0**   8.0   6.6   9.5   15.8   16.0                    Total Fixed Charges **$****38.7**  $66.4  $67.7  $79.8  $87.6  $107.0                                             **Earnings:**                        Income (loss) from continuing operations **$****25.7**  $112.9  $87.2  $93.2  $26.7  $(44.5)Income taxes  **17.5**   53.0   20.6   17.7   (11.6)  (77.4)Fixed charges as above  **38.7**   66.4   67.7   79.8   87.6   107.0                    Total Earnings **$****81.9**  $232.3  $175.5  $190.7  $102.7  $(14.9)                    **Ratio Of Earnings To Fixed Chargesand Preferred and Preference StockDividend Requirements**  **2.12**   3.50   2.59   2.39   1.17   (0.14) (b)                    (a) Includes annual dividend requirements of $12.6 million for the Monthly Income PreferredSecurities (MIPS) per year for 2002 and prior. For 2003, only $6.3 million is included forthe period January 1 – June 30. From July 1, 2003 until their redemption in 2004, MIPSdividends were included with interest on long-term debt due to the adoption of SFAS No.150. (b) In order to achieve a ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred and preferencestock dividend requirements of one to one, Total Earnings would need to increase byapproximately $122 million.
40
§ 208.2 Applicability. This part applies to: ( a ) The Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities in the DoD (referred to collectively in this part as the “DoD Components”).
( b ) The administrative agent, and all recipients of awards by NSEP.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.4

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Harold W. Ingalls, certify that

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of
Serologicals Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: June 2, 2004


/s/ HAROLD W. INGALLS
--------------------------------
Harold W. Ingalls
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO MURCIA-NAJARRO,

AKA Francisco Murcia,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73983

Agency No. A095-013-224

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 9, 2014** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Murcia-Najarro, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

DEC 15 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.

2006). We deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Murcia-Najarro’s untimely

asylum application was filed within a reasonable period of time from the denial of

his application for temporary protected status. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(5); Dhital

v. Mukasey, 532 F.3d 1044, 1050 (9th Cir. 2008) (application filed 22 months after

expiration of lawful nonimmigrant status was not reasonable). Thus, MurciaNajarro’s asylum claim fails.

Murcia-Najarro does not contend he suffered past persecution. Substantial

evidence supports the agency’s determination that Murcia-Najarro failed to

establish the government of El Salvador is unable or unwilling to control the

people he fears. See Truong v. Holder, 613 F.3d 938, 941-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (per

curiam); Nahrvani v. Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2005) (record did

not compel finding petitioner faced persecution by the government or forces the

government was unwilling or unable to control). Thus, Murcia-Najarro’s

withholding of removal claim fails.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of MurciaNajarro’s CAT claim because he failed to show that it is more likely than not that

2 11-73983
he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if

returned to El Salvador. See Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir.

2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 11-73983