alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DON EARLE MORGAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-342 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed October 13, 2017.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Michael E. Raiden, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Don Earle Morgan appeals his c onvictions and sentences for one count of

criminal mischief in violation of section 806.13(1)(b)(1), Flor ida Statutes (2014), and one

count of burglary of a dwelling in violation of section 810.02( 3)(a). The written judgment- 2 - improperly identifies the criminal mischief as a first-degree m isdemeanor, rather than a

second-degree misdemeanor. Accordingly, we remand with instruc tions for the trial

court to correct that scrivener's error in the written judgment . See Jackson v. State, 192

So. 3d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016); Riley v. State, 622 So. 2d 94 (F la. 2d DCA 1993);

Culbertson v. State, 547 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). We aff irm Mr. Morgan's

convictions and sentences in all other respects.

Affirmed; remanded with instruction to correct scrivener's err or.

LaROSE, C.J., and CRENSHAW and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
# C_2008223EN.01005801.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/58

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 July 2008 — Jungbunzlauer and Others v Commission

(Case T-492/04) (1)

1

(2008/C 223/102)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

1

---
### **CHAPTER 96—PERSONNEL FLEXIBILITIES RELATING TO LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCIES**

Sec.
9601.
Definitions.
9602.
Competitive service; time-limited appointments.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

United Telephone Company of the

Northwest, Lumen Technologies

Government Solutions, Inc. (fka

Qwest Government Services, Inc. dba

CenturyLink QGS), and Qwest

Corporation )

)

)

)

)

) ASBCA Nos. 63370, 63371, 63372

63373, 63374, 63375

)

Under Contract No. N00406

- 15

- F

- 0012 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Shelly Ewald, Esq.

Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, L.L.P.

McLean, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Trevor Davies, Esq.

Alan M. Mygatt

- Tauber, Esq.

Devin A. Wolak, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal s are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 1 1 , 2023

LAURA J. ARNETT

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63370, 63371, 63372, 63373,

63374, 63375

, Appeals of United Telephone Company of the Northwest, Lumen

Technologies Government Solutions, Inc. (fka Qwest Government Services, Inc. dba

CenturyLink QGS), and Qwest Corporation , rendered in conformance with the Board’s

Charter.

Dated: October 11, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
##### 



Exhibit 12
 Sybase, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands, except for ratios)
(For the years ended December 31,)
 2007
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004
    
    2003Earnings:Income before income taxes
and cumulative effect of an
accounting change
    
    $
    189,952
    
    
    $
    161,317
    
    
    $
    136,714
    
    
    $
    100,966
    
    
    $
    118,095Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    21,969
    
    
    
    21,699
    
    
    
    20,233
    
    
    
    11,988
    
    
    
    13,204Total Earnings, as defined
    
    
    211,921
    
    
    
    183,016
    
    
    
    156,947
    
    
    
    112,954
    
    
    
    131,299Fixed ChargesInterest Expense
    
    
    9,663
    
    
    
    9,516
    
    
    
    8,116
    
    
    
    308
    
    
    
    62Amortization of debt expense
    
    
    1,969
    
    
    
    1,969
    
    
    
    1,671
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Estimated interest portion
on rental expense
    
    
    10,337
    
    
    
    10,214
    
    
    
    10,446
    
    
    
    11,680
    
    
    
    13,142Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    21,969
    
    
    
    21,699
    
    
    
    20,233
    
    
    
    11,988
    
    
    
    13,204Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    9.6
    
    
    
    8.4
    
    
    
    7.8
    
    
    
    9.4
    
    
    
    9.9
<PAGE>
                                                               EXHIBIT 10.10A

                          Addendum No. 2 to Note
                         dated February 27, 1997
                    in the amount of $14,271,115.19
                              (the "Note")


     The Note is hereby amended to increase its principal sum up to an amount
not to exceed Seventeen Million Dollars ($17,000,000), to reflect additional
borrowings by SAC Holding Corporation from time to time.  All other terms and
conditions of the Note shall remain in place so long as they do not conflict
with this Addendum.

Dated as of the 8th day of July, 1998


                                                      SAC HOLDING CORPORATION

                                                     By: /s/ Bruce Brockhagen
                                                     Name:   Bruce Brockhagen
                                                     Title: Secretary
#### § 1703.1 Scope and purpose.

This part sets forth the policy and procedures with respect to the production or disclosure of material contained in the files of the ODNI, information relating to or based upon material contained in the files of the ODNI, and information acquired by any person while such person was an employee of the ODNI as part of the performance of that person's official duties or because of that person's association with the ODNI.
§ 955.12 Training. ( a ) *On-the-job training.* Except as provided in § 955.14(c) for reexamination, each applicant for the issuance of an OSM blaster certificate who does not qualify as a blaster or the equivalent shall: ( 1 ) Have received on-the-job training, including practical field experience in blasting operations, from a blaster or the equivalent for 2 out of the 3 years preceding the submission of his or her application; and
( 2 ) Have obtained from the blaster or the equivalent, the relevant employer, or other knowledgeable source, satisfactory evidence of having received on-the-job training in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) *Training course.* Except as provided in § 955.14(c) for reexamination, each applicant for the issuance or reissuance of an OSM blaster certificate shall: ( 1 ) Within 2 years prior to submitting an application, have completed a training course as follows: ( i ) For certificate issuance the course shall cover the technical aspects of blasting operations and State and Federal laws governing the storage, transportation and use of explosives, including the topics specified in § 850.13(b) of this chapter; or
( ii ) For certificate reissuance the course shall cover any significant changes that have occurred in the topics specified in § 850.13(b) of this chapter since the applicant last completed a course that was accepted by OSM for the issuance or reissuance of an OSM blaster certificate. If OSM determines that no significant changes have occurred, OSM may waive this requirement; and
( 2 ) Have obtained from the training provider satisfactory evidence that he or she has completed training in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) *Availability.* OSM shall ensure that courses are available as provided in § 850.13(b) of this chapter to train persons subject to this part who are responsible for the use of explosives in surface coal mining operations.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with this Annual Report of Sionix Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
R. Currier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and
in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and,




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
    Report.




Date:
January 13, 2010




/s/
      James R. CurrierJames
      R. CurrierChief
      Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer




A
certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject
to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates
it by reference.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-10-000021926-DEC-201209:05 AM
§ 1605.7 Region Manager. ( a ) Subject to the direction and control of the Director of Selective Service, the Region Manager of Selective Service for each region shall be in immediate charge of the Region Headquarters and shall be responsible for carrying out the region functions of the Selective Service System in the various States assigned to the region.
( b ) The Region Manager will perform such duties as are prescribed by the Director of Selective Service.
### §44742. Interference with the duties of organization designation authorization unit members

(a) In General.—The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall continuously seek to eliminate or minimize interference by an ODA holder that affects the performance of authorized functions by ODA unit members.

(b) Prohibition.—

(1) In general.—It shall be unlawful for any individual who is a supervisory employee of an ODA holder that manufactures a transport category airplane to commit an act of interference with an ODA unit member's performance of authorized functions.

(2) Civil penalty.—

(A) Individuals.—An individual shall be subject to a civil penalty under section 46301(a)(1) for each violation under paragraph (1).

(B) Savings clause.—Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as limiting or constricting any other authority of the Administrator to pursue an enforcement action against an individual or organization for violation of applicable Federal laws or regulations of the Administration.

(c) Reporting.—

(1) Reports to oda holder.—An ODA unit member of an ODA holder that manufactures a transport category airplane shall promptly report any instances of interference to the office of the ODA holder that is designated to receive such reports.

(2) Reports to the faa.—

(A) In general.—The ODA holder office described in paragraph (1) shall investigate reports and submit to the office of the Administration designated by the Administrator to accept and review such reports any instances of interference reported under paragraph (1).

(B) Contents.—The Administrator shall prescribe parameters for the submission of reports to the Administration under this paragraph, including the manner, time, and form of submission. Such report shall include the results of any investigation conducted by the ODA holder in response to a report of interference, a description of any action taken by the ODA holder as a result of the report of interference, and any other information or potentially mitigating factors the ODA holder or the Administrator deems appropriate.

(d) Definitions.—

(1) General applicability.—The definitions contained in section 44736(c) shall apply to this section.

(2) Interference.—In this section, the term "interference" means—

(A) blatant or egregious statements or behavior, such as harassment, beratement, or threats, that a reasonable person would conclude was intended to improperly influence or prejudice an ODA unit member's performance of his or her duties; or

(B) the presence of non-ODA unit duties or activities that conflict with the performance of authorized functions by ODA unit members.

(Added Pub. L. 116–260, div. V, title I, §107(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2323.)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-59244) pertaining to the Security National Bank and Trust 
Company 401(k) Profit Sharing Savings Plan and the Registration Statement (Form 
S-8 No. 33-80761) pertaining to the Security Banc Corporation 1995 Stock Option 
Plan of our report dated January 23, 1997, with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements of Security Banc Corporation incorporated by reference in 
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 28, 1997
# C_2008116EN.01003101.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/31

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Wilms v Commission

(Case F-99/05) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - 2004 promotion exercise - Allocation of priority points - Application ratione temporis of provisions of the new staff regulations)

(2008/C 116/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Günter Wilms (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. van der Woude and V. Landes, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, agents, and D. Slater, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

First, annulment of the decisions awarding promotion points to the applicant in respect of the 2004 promotion exercise and, second, annulment of the merit list of Grade A*10 officials promoted to Grade A*11 in the 2004 promotion exercise

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision fixing the total of Mr Wilms' promotion points in the 2004 promotion exercise and the decision refusing him promotion in that exercise. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision fixing the total of Mr Wilms' promotion points in the 2004 promotion exercise and the decision refusing him promotion in that exercise.

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action.

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 14.1.2006, p. 25 (Case originally registered at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under T-386/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15 December 2005).

1

---
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of      HickoryTech. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      2, 2010 | /s/ John W.      Finke                    |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                | John      W. Finke                        |
|                                | President      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
# l7fll SOLVAY**~SOLEXIS** HECEIV::D OPPT C81C 

# NOV 082012 2012OCT 22 Af1 

## II: 09

October 22, 2012



### VIA COURIER OPPTDocument Control Office (DCO) The United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA East Building, Room 6428 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 

### RE: SOLVAY SOLEXIS, INC. 2010/2015 PFOA STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM DOCKET ID NUMBER EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0621 Inresponse to industry's participation with the USEPA EPA 2010115 PFOA Stewardship Program, Solvay Solexis, Inc. hereby submits the year 2011 data for emissions and product content ofPFOA and related higherhomologues. This submission contains confidential business information and Solvay Solexis, Inc. expects it to be managed accordingly. As such, one original and one sanitized paper copy is included in the submission. In addition, electronic copies ofthe original and sanitized documents are enclosed. Ifyou have any questions or require additional information concerning this submittal, please contact me at (856) 251-3446. Sincerely,

Brad Kent, Ph.D. Manager, West Deptford Technology Center Solvay Solexis, Inc.

Enclosures 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 63130000002/S 

## Company Sanitized Solvay Solexis, Inc. 10 Leonard Lane, West Deptford, NJ 08086 856.853.8119 Fax: 856.853 6405 www.solvaysolexis.com

# ~~Responsible Care' Good Chemr1tryat Work
### **CHAPTER 3039—MISCELLANEOUS**

Sec.
303901.
Loan insurance program for preservation of property included on National Register.
303902.
Training in, and dissemination of information concerning, professional methods and techniques for preservation of historic property.
303903.
Preservation education and training program.
#### § 229.11 Appeals relating to permits.

Any affected person may appeal permit issuance, denial of permit issuance, suspension, revocation, and terms and conditions of a permit through existing administrative appeal procedures, or through procedures which may be established by the Federal land manager pursuant to section 10(b) of the Act and this part.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Hydrologic properties andground-water flow systems of the paleozoic rocks in the Upper Colorado RiverBasin in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, excluding the SanJuan Basin /**
 
Document
 
Plate 1 | Plate 2 | Plate 3 | Plate 4 | Plate 5 | Plate 6 | Plate 7
Plate 8 | Plate 9 | Plate 10 | Plate 11 | Plate 12 | Plate 13
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1411-B
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001052727
 
April 12, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       59
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2473
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               63
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2473
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 12954
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9423
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               9423
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    123
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      9546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   160.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   160.86
        

</TABLE>
Appeal No. 75-214.

#### Rego Displays, Inc. *v.*Louis Fournier.

*Gerald C. DeMaria,*for plaintiff.

*Matthew J. Zito, Jules Delade,*for defendant.

This case is assigned to the calendar for May 4, 1977, 9:30 a.m., for oral argument. The defendant will be expected to *show cause*in what manner the trial justice erred or overlooked or misconceived material evidence in finding that this case is controlled by *Colonial Laudries, Inc.*v. *Henry,*48 R.I. 332, 138 A. 47 (1927).
### §234. Preservation of Transportation Security Administration as a distinct entity

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Transportation Security Administration shall be maintained as a distinct entity within the Department.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §424, as added Pub. L. 114–125, title VIII, §802(g)(1)(B)(iv)(I), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 212.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, known as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 234, Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §424, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2185, provided for the preservation of the Transportation Security Administration as a distinct entity applicable until 2 years after Nov. 25, 2002, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–125, title VIII, §802(g)(1)(B)(iv)(I), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 212.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 1350 Certification of the**

**Chief Executive Officer**

I, James R. Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporationfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.