alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Basic Neuroscience of Aging Review Committee, January 19, 2021, 11:00 a.m. to January 21, 2021, 04:00 p.m., National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 25, 2020, 85 FR 75345.                

The meeting notice is amended to change the date of the meeting from January 20-21 to January 19-21, 2021. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: December 18, 2020. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-28525 Filed 12-23-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §100725. Donations

The Secretary may accept donations of money or services for expenditure or employment to meet expected, immediate, or ongoing response costs. The donations may be expended or employed at any time after their acceptance, without further Congressional action.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3108.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 100725 | 16 U.S.C. 19jj–4. | Pub. L. 101–337, §5, July 27, 1990, 104 Stat. 381. |

Section
### §1208. Pipeline security and incident recovery plan

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation and the Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, and in accordance with the Annex to the Memorandum of Understanding executed on August 9, 2006, the National Strategy for Transportation Security, and Homeland Security Presidential Directive–7, shall develop a pipeline security and incident recovery protocols plan. The plan shall include—

(1) for the Government to provide increased security support to the most critical interstate and intrastate natural gas and hazardous liquid transmission pipeline infrastructure and operations as determined under section 1207 of this title when—

(A) under severe security threat levels of alert; or

(B) under specific security threat information relating to such pipeline infrastructure or operations exists; and

(2) an incident recovery protocol plan, developed in conjunction with interstate and intrastate transmission and distribution pipeline operators and terminals and facilities operators connected to pipelines, to develop protocols to ensure the continued transportation of natural gas and hazardous liquids to essential markets and for essential public health or national defense uses in the event of an incident affecting the interstate and intrastate natural gas and hazardous liquid transmission and distribution pipeline system, which shall include protocols for restoring essential services supporting pipelines and granting access to pipeline operators for pipeline infrastructure repair, replacement, or bypass following an incident.

#### (b) Existing private and public sector efforts

The plan shall take into account actions taken or planned by both private and public entities to address identified pipeline security issues and assess the effective integration of such actions.

#### (c) Consultation

In developing the plan under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of Transportation, interstate and intrastate transmission and distribution pipeline operators, nonprofit employee organizations representing pipeline employees, emergency responders, offerors, State pipeline safety agencies, public safety officials, and other relevant parties.

#### (d) Report

#### (1) Contents

Not later than 2 years after August 3, 2007, the Secretary shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a report containing the plan required by subsection (a), including an estimate of the private and public sector costs to implement any recommendations.

#### (2) Format

The Secretary may submit the report in both classified and redacted formats if the Secretary determines that such action is appropriate or necessary.

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1558, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 476.)
§ 200.2020 Initial decision. ( a ) The ALJ will issue an initial decision, based only on the record, which will contain findings of fact and conclusions of law.
( b ) The ALJ may affirm, increase or reduce the penalties, assessment proposed or imposed by the DHA.
( c ) The ALJ will issue the initial decision to all parties within 120 days after the time for submission of post-hearing briefs and reply briefs, if permitted, has expired. The decision will be accompanied by a statement describing the right of any party to file a notice of appeal with the DAB and instructions for how to file such appeal. If the ALJ fails to meet the deadline contained in this paragraph (c), he or she will notify the parties of the reason for the delay and will set a new deadline.
( d ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, unless the initial decision is appealed to the DAB, it will be final and binding on the parties 30 days after the ALJ serves the parties with a copy of the decision. If service is by mail, the date of service will be deemed to be 5 days from the date of mailing.
( e ) If an extension of time within which to appeal the initial decision is granted under § 200.2021(a), except as provided in § 200.2022(a), the initial decision will become final and binding on the day following the end of the extension period.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2004

RAYMON REDMON HARMON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORMA RADAU; PAIGE M. GRIMBALL; BRENT DETER;

THE BUNCOMBE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL

SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-99-209-MU-1-3)

Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymon Redmon Harmon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymon Redmon Harmon, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000)

complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

Harmon’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district

court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App.

P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and

jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

December 13, 1999. Harmon’s notice of appeal was filed on July 17,

2000. Because Harmon failed to file a timely notice of appeal or

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
### SUBCHAPTER VII—BUDGET AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT MATTERS
Beverly, 

On Apri116, 2015, the State of North Carolina, through the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural 

Resources (NC DENR), Division of Air Quality (DAQ), submitted a request to redesignate the Charlotte-Gastonia-Salisbury 

ozone nonattainment area to attainment for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The request included a maintenance plan as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). 

On May 1, 2015, staff from EPA Region 4 requested that North Carolina supply additional clarification on the timing of 

the contingency measures submitted with the maintenance plan. North Carolina is submitting this note to provide this 

clarification. 

The maintenance contingency plan consisted of primary and secondary triggers which, if activated witt require the State 

to take corrective action to mitigate a violation of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS. I am writing to confirm that it is our 

intent to address and correct any violation of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable and within 

18-24 months from a trigger activation. Upon activation, we witt commence analysis to determine the cause of the 

violation or exceedance of the Ozone NAAQS and take action as described in the maintenance plan. 

If you require additional clarifications, please let me know. 

Sheila Sheila Holman, Director 

NCDENR, Division of Air Quality 

1641 Mail Service Center 

Raleigh, NC 27699-1641 

Phone/Fax: (919) 707-8430 

www.ncair.org 

sheila.holman@ncdenr.gov 

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed 

to third parties unless the content is exempt by statue or other regulation . 

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N C Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties 

1
Appeal No. 76-378.

#### Shepard & Morse Lumber Company *v.*Contractors Service Incorporated.

*Winograd, Shine & Zacks, P.C., John M. Roney,*for plaintiff.

*Nugent & Nugent, J. Joseph Nu-gent, Jr.,*for defendant.

The plaintiff’s motion to remand this case for the purpose of hearing and determination of plaintiff’s motion for a protective order, pursuant to Rule 7 of this court, is granted.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of John Deere Capital Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertify that to the best of our knowledge:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| August  27, 2004 | */s/  R. W. Lane*      | Chairman and Principal Executive Officer               |
|------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|             |                   |                                                   |
|             |                   |                                                   |
| August  27, 2004 | */s/  Nathan J. Jones* | Senior Vice President and Principal Financial  Officer |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toJohn Deere Capital Corporation and will be retained by John Deere CapitalCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
§ 1800.21 Processing of requests for records. ( a ) *In general.* Requests meeting the requirements of §§ 1800.11 through 1800.13 shall be accepted as formal requests and processed under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and these regulations. Pursuant to the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996, upon receipt, NACIC shall within twenty (20) days record each request, acknowledge receipt to the requester in writing, and thereafter effect the necessary taskings to the NACIC components reasonably believed to hold responsive records.
( b ) *Database of “officially released information.”* As an alternative to extensive tasking and as an accommodation to many requesters, NACIC maintains a database of “officially released information” which contains copies of documents released by NACIC. Searches of this database can be accomplished expeditiously. Moreover, requests that are specific and well-focused will often incur minimal, if any, costs. Requesters interested in this means of access should so indicate in their correspondence. Consistent with the mandate of the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996, on-line electronic access to these records is available to the public. Detailed information regarding such access is available from the point of contact specified in § 1800.3.
( c ) *Effect of certain exemptions.* In processing a request, NACIC shall decline to confirm or deny the existence or nonexistence of any responsive records whenever the fact of their existence or nonexistence is itself classified under Executive Order 12958 and may jeopardize intelligence sources or methods protected pursuant to section 103(c)(6) of the National Security Act of 1947. In such circumstances, NACIC, in the form of a final written response, shall so inform the requester and advise of his or her right to an administrative appeal.
( d ) *Time for response.* Pursuant to the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996, NACIC will utilize every effort to determine within the statutory guideline of twenty (20) days after receipt of an initial request whether to comply with such a request. However, should the volume of requests require that NACIC seek additional time from a requester pursuant to § 1800.33, NACIC will inform the requester in writing and further advise of his or her right to file an administrative appeal of any adverse determination.
Appeal No. 77-125.

#### Town of Glocester *v.*Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corp. *et al.*

*George W. Shuster,*Town Solicitor, for plaintiff.

*Keenan, Rice, Dolan, Reardon & Kiernan, Leonard A. Kiernan, Jr.,*for defendants.

The defendant’s motion to affirm the judgment below pursuant to Rule 16(g) is denied.
### §100755. Applicability of other laws

(a) In General.—This section and sections 100501, 100901(d) to (h), 101302(b)(2), 101901(c), and 102711 of this title, and the various authorities relating to the administration and protection of System units, including the provisions of law listed in subsection (b), shall, to the extent that those provisions are not in conflict with any such specific provision, be applicable to System units, and any reference in any of these provisions to a System unit does not limit those provisions to that System unit.

(b) Applicable Provisions.—The provisions of law referred to in subsection (a) are—

(1) section 100101(a), chapter 1003, sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, 101101, 101102, 101511, 102101, 102712, 102901, 104905, and 104906, and chapter 2003 of this title;

(2) the Act of March 4, 1911 (43 U.S.C. 961); and

(3) chapter 3201 of this title.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3112.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 100755 | 16 U.S.C. 1c(b). | Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 384, §2(b), 67 Stat. 496; Pub. L. 91–383, §2(b), Aug. 18, 1970, 84 Stat. 826. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "reference in such Act" are interpreted to mean "reference in such Acts" for clarity.

In subsection (b)(1), the words "relating to donation of land and money", "relating to roads and trails", "relating to approach roads to national monuments", "relating to conveyance of roads to States", "relating to acquisitions of inholdings", and "relating to aid to visitors in emergencies" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "the Act of March 3, 1905 (33 Stat. 873; 16 U.S.C. 10), relating to arrests" are omitted because the Act was repealed by section 10(a)(2) of the Act of August 18, 1970 (known as the National Park System General Authorities Act) (Public Law 91–383), as added by section 2 of the Act of October 7, 1976 (Public Law 94–458, 90 Stat. 1941). The words "relating to services or other accommodations for the public, emergency supplies and services to concessioners, acceptability of travelers checks, care and removal of indigents" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "the Act of October 9, 1965 (79 Stat. 696; 16 U.S.C. 20–20g), relating to concessions" are omitted because the Act was repealed by section 415(a) of the National Parks Omnibus Management Act of 1998 (Public Law 105–391, 112 Stat. 3515).

In subsection (b)(2), the words "relating to rights of way" are omitted as unnecessary.

Subsection (b)(3) is added for clarity because many of the laws that established a System unit provided that the Secretary, in addition to administering the unit in accordance with the Act of August 25, 1916 (16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 3, and 4) and with laws generally applicable to System units, administer the unit in accordance with the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 to 467).
January26, 2015 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations 1200 NewJerseyAvenue SE Washington, DC 20590



### SUBJ'ECT: !PETITION FOR EXEMPTION- FAR 121.434(c)(1)(ii)

Reference: DocketNumberFAA-2001-8722

Dear Sir/Madam: In accordance with the provisions of Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) 11.61, SkyWestAirl:ines petitions for an extension of Exemption No. 7689D (Docket No. FAA-2001-8722). If granted, this exemption would provide relief to the extent necessaryto substitute a quaHf:ied and authorized check airman in place of an FAA inspectorto observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) while that PIC is performing presonibed duties during at least one flight that includes a takeoff and landing when completing initial orupgrade training as specified in FAR 121.424. Additionally, the proposed exemption extension, if granted, would allowthe substitution only atthe discretion of the certificate holder and onlywhen an FAA Inspector is not immediately available, subjectto certain conditions and limitations. Exemption 7689D will expire on January 31, .2015, unless superseded or amended. Justification for extending this exemption was stated in the original exemption, dated January 3, 2001. SkyWestAirlines continues to expand its operation and foresees cont,inued growth for an extended period of time. The conditions and circumstances in regard to public interest and safety which warranted the original grant of exemption continue to exist. The exemption has been used since first granted with no known compromise of safety. Extending this exemption will not adversely affect safety, but will simply provide an equivalent alternative to an administrative aspect of the stated regulations. Extending this exemption will have no adverse impacton the interests oftheaircraft owners oron governmental agencies.

444 South River Road St. George, Utah 84790 Phone 435.634.3000 www.skywest.comU.S. DepartmentofTransportation January26, 2015 Pagetwo

As the renewal of this exemption is not precedent-setting, SkyWest Airlines requests thatpublication of our petition in the Federal Register be waived in accordance with Section 11.87(b). The renewal ofthis exemption is not a controversial issue, asthe reasons and conditions for implementation are identical to Exemption 7689 original issue.
Sincerely,

.

# ~#!a /./·?**~** 

# //?...____

... Chris Brown DirectorAircraft Operations SkyWestAirlines

cc: Andrew Ayers, Principal Operations Inspector, FAA David Moxham, DirectorTraining Robin Wall, Manaager Flight Standards
----

|                                                           | Country ofincorporation | Legalshareholding                                                   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                           |                    | 2015                                                                | 2014 |
| Subsidiaries within the Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc Group |                    |            % | % |
| Caledonia Holdings Zimbabwe (Private) Limited (1)              | Zimbabwe                | 100                                                                 | 100 |
| Caledonia Mining Services Limited (2)                          | Zimbabwe                | 100                                                                 | 100 |
| Eersteling Gold Mining Corporation Limited                     | South Africa            | 100                                                                 | 100 |
| Fintona Investments Proprietary Limited                        | South Africa            | 100                                                                 | 100 |
| Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited (1)          | South Africa            | 100                                                                 | 100 |
| Greenstone Management Services Limited (3)                     | United Kingdom          | 100                                                                 | 100 |
| Caledonia Holdings (Africa) Limited                            | Barbados                | 100                                                                 | 100 |
| Blanket (Barbados) Holdings Limited (4)                        | Barbados                | 100                                                                 | 100 |
| Blanket Mine (1983) (Private) Limited(5)                       | Zimbabwe                | (2)49                                                               | 49 |

|  | (1) | Direct subsidiary of Greenstone Management Services Holdings Limited (United Kingdom) |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | Direct subsidiary of Caledonia Holdings Zimbabwe (Private) Limited |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (3) | Direct subsidiary of  Blanket (Barbados) Holdings Limited |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (4) | Direct subsidiary of  Caledonia Holdings (Africa) Limited |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (5) | Direct subsidiary of Caledonia Holdings Zimbabwe (Private) Limited |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

----