alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 15, 2014

Order 

April 15, 2014

148066(42)

In re TALH, Minor.

SC: 148066

COA: 314749

Mecosta CC Family Division: 

12-001290-AY

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the joint motion of the parties to extend the time for 

filing the supplemental briefs required by this Court’s February 21, 2014 order directing 

oral argument on the leave application is GRANTED. The supplemental briefs will be 

accepted as timely filed if received on or before May 19, 2014.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose Cruz, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court convicting defendant of the crimes of robbery, first degree, grand larceny, first degree, and assault, second degree.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Thomas Wysokowski, Appellant, v. Joseph P. Conboy, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Institution, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Washington County, dismissing relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus following a hearing. Relator, convicted by a jury verdict of the crime of manslaughter, first degree, seeks his release from custody on the grounds that the indictment was not legally sufficient and that illegally obtained evidence was used to secure his conviction, citing *Mapp*v. *Ohio*(367 U. S. 643). Relator contends that the indictment was defective in that it did not contain facts stating the acts constituting the crime, that it did not inform him as to which defendant hit, kicked and stomped the victim, and that it did not apprise him as to the specific subdivision of section 1044 of the Penal Law which *664was involved. The sufficiency of an indictment must be raised before judgment (e.g., *People*v. *Parker,*8 A D 2d 863) unless the defect complained of would strip the court of jurisdiction, and such is clearly not the case here. The simplified form of indictment here utilized has long been held to constitutionally confer jurisdiction upon the trial court of the offense charged therein (e.g., *People*v. *Bogdanoff,*254 R. Y. 16). If relator believed the indictment insufficient or harbored any doubt as to the offense charged or his involvement therewith he could have resolved the issue by objecting to the sufficiency of the indictment prior to judgment or by the simple expediency of requesting a bill of particulars (Code Grim. Pro., § 295-g). Similarly, any defects in the arraignment procedure prior to indictment would not invalidate the indictment or conviction *(People ex rel. Hirschberg*v. *Close,*1 R Y 2d 258). Relator’s contention respecting the *Mapp*rule, even if properly raised by habeas corpus, has no merit here since the appellate process in this case was exhausted before the *Mapp*decision was rendered (e.g., *People*v. *Loria,*10 R Y 2d 368). Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herliky and Reynolds, JJ.
Exhibit 3.2.1

                                     By-Laws

                                       of

                          BEN & JERRY'S HOMEMADE, INC.

                                    Article V

                                 Shares of Stock

                 Stock  Certificates.  Each  shareholder  shall be entitled to a
  certificate representing the shares of the Corporation owned by him, under the
  corporate seal or a facsimile thereof,  in such form as may be prescribed from
  time to  time by the  directors.  The  certificate  shall  be  signed  (either
  manually or by  facsimile) by the  President or a  Vice-President,  and by the
  Treasurer  or the  Secretary.  In case any  officer  who has  signed  or whose
  facsimile  signature has been placed on such certificate  shall have ceased to
  be such officer  before such  certificate  is issued,  it may be issued by the
  Corporation with the same effect as if he or she were such officer at the time
  of its issue.

                  Every certificate  representing the Corporation's shares which
  are  subject to any  restriction  on  transfer  pursuant  to the  Articles  of
  Association, the By-Laws or any agreement to which the Corporation is a party,
  shall have the restriction  noted  conspicuously  on the certificate and shall
  also set  forth  on the  face or back  thereof  either  the  full  text of the
  restriction  or a  statement  of  the  existence  of  such  restriction  and a
  statement  that the  Corporation  will furnish a copy thereof to the holder of
  such  certificate upon written request and without charge.  Every  certificate
  representing  the   Corporation's   shares  issued  when  the  Corporation  is
  authorized to issue more than one class or series of shares shall set forth on
  its face or back  either  the full  text of the  preferences,  voting  powers,
  qualifications and special and relative rights of the shares of each class and
  series  authorized  to be  issued  or a  statement  of the  existence  of such
  preferences,  powers,  qualifications,  and rights,  and a statement  that the
  Corporation will furnish a copy thereof to the holder of such certificate upon
  written request and without charge.
<PAGE>
### An early-20th-century uplift in Southern California

By: R. O. CastleM.R. ElliottT.D. Gilmore

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1362

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 234.7 Disorderly conduct. A person commits disorderly conduct when, with intent to cause public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or violence, or knowingly or recklessly creating a risk thereof, such person commits any of the following prohibited acts: ( a ) Engages in fighting or threatening, or in violent behavior.
( b ) Uses language, an utterance, or gesture, or engages in a display or act that is obscene, physically threatening or menacing, or done in a manner that is likely to inflict injury or incite an immediate breach of the peace.
( c ) Makes noise that is unreasonable, considering the nature and purpose of the actor's conduct, location, time of day or night, and other factors that would govern the conduct of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances.
( d ) Creates or maintains a hazardous or physically offensive condition.
( e ) Impedes or threatens the security of persons or property, or disrupts the performance of official duties by Department of Defense employees, or obstructs the use of areas such as entrances, foyers, lobbies, corridors, concourses, offices, elevators, stairways, roadways, driveways, walkways, or parking lots.
To Whom it may concern,

My name is Brian Reubelt, I am the owner of Reubelt Photography. I am requesting a 

333 exemption for flying my UAS for aerial cinematography for my business. I believe 

that this exemption would benefit the public eye because I will be able to provide my 

services to wedding clients, real estate clients, and independent films as well. This 

exemption will not effect the safety of the public. I would not be operating the UAS near 

any people or places that may cause harm to persons or property. I will uphold all safety 

regulations and follow all guidelines while operating the UAS. The aircraft I am 

requesting exemption for is a DJI Phantom 3. My certificate number is FA3WWYWLYE. 

Thank you. If you have any questions please contact me by email at 

breubelt93@gmail.com or by phone at 561-859-6204.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Geohydrology and simulation ofsteady-state flow conditions in regional aquifer systems in Cretaceous andolder rocks underlying Kansas, Nebraska, and parts of Arkansas, Colorado,Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming**
 
Report | Plate 1 | Plate 2
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1414-C
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001056057
 
May 10, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995 for Hallwood Energy Partners, L.P. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768172
<NAME> HALLWOOD ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           4,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,503
<PP&E>                                         605,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 510,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,866
<BONDS>                                         37,557
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,152
<SALES>                                         41,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,780
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,031)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 2001.51 Technical security.

Based upon the risk management factors referenced in § 2001.40 of this directive, agency heads shall determine the requirement for technical countermeasures such as Technical Surveillance Countermeasures and TEMPEST necessary to detect or deter exploitation of classified information through technical collection methods and may apply countermeasures in accordance with NSTISSI 7000, *TEMPEST Countermeasures for Facilities,* and SPB Issuance 6-97, *National Policy on Technical Surveillance Countermeasures.*
### Part B—Port Operations
# Mark B. Goldstein, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW
April 9, 2015 

# RECEIVED APR 14 20!5 HEARING DOCKET VIA U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPTREQUESTED FEDERALAVIATION ADMINISTRATION 600 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE SW WILBUR WRIGHT BUILDING, SUITE 2Wl000 WASHINGTON, DC 20591 ATTENTION HEARING DOCKET CLERK, AGC 430 

### Re: 2014S0190149-ProfessionalFlight Transport, Inc. Gentlemen: We represent Professional FlightTransport, Inc. Request is hereby made for a hearing concerning the above-referenced matter. Ifyon should have any questions or comments concerningtheforegoing, please feel free to contact me so that we may discuss same.

MBG:agw Cc: DeitrickJohnson, Esquire (via electronic mail) Client (via electronic mail)

2700 N. MILITARY TRAIL, SUITE 130 • BocA RATON, FLORIDA 33431 • TELEPHONE (561) 989-9955 • FACSIMILE (561) 989-9966 

### mbg@bizavlaw.com • www.bizavlaw.com
#### § 933.824 Special performance standards—mountaintop removal.

Part 824 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Mountaintop Removal,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining operations constituting mountaintop removal mining.
Order entered May 16, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01464
- CR No. 05
- 18
- 014 82
- CR
MACKENZIE RENE CHESN EY, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Ap peal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 401
- 81645
- 2017 & 401
- 81646
- 2017



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record , requested December 5, 2018 , was due March 14, 2019

. By postcard dated March 18, 2019, we notified court r eporter Kimberly Tinsley that the reporter’s record was past due and directed her to file, by April 17, 2019, the reporter’s record or written verification that no hearings were recorded. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed, and we have had no communication from Ms. Tinsley.
We ORDER court reporter Kimberly Tinsley to file the reporter’s record in these appeals WITHIN TWENTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER . We caution Ms. Tinsley that the failure to do so will result in the Court taking what ever remedies it has available, including ordering that she not sit until the reporter’s record is filed.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Mark Rusch,

Presiding Judge, 401st Judicial District Court; Kimberly Tinsley, court reporter, 401st Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
### §4522. General provision

An award under this subchapter is in addition to the basic pay of the recipient.

(Added Pub. L. 101–509, title V, §529 [title IV, §408(a)], Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1427, 1467.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1992, see section 529 [title IV, §408(d)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out as a note under section 4521 of this title.
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Conroy, David

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 12:12 PM

To: Marc Cone; Jeff Crawford

Cc: Arnold, Anne; Moraff, Kenneth; Hamjian, Lynne; Simcox, Alison

Subject: SSM SIP Call Final Rule 

Marc:

This message is a follow‐up to my voice message earlier today notifying you about the final action the EPA

Administrator signed today to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times,

including when the source is operating during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).  

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning

the treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those

emissions are treated in state implementation plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as

part of this action, EPA has revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean

Air Act.

The EPA is calling for 36 states, including your state, to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health

and ensure consistency with the Clean Air Act and the EPA’s current SSM Policy.  Your state will have 18

months to submit revisions of your state plan to EPA. Your state’s revised SIP is due to EPA by November 22,

2016.  

As part of our notification to your state about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter from the

EPA’s Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe.  

To inform you of the details on the final action, including the specific SIP provisions your state needs to

address, I have attached a pre‐publication version of the action and final fact sheet.   These will be posted on

our website at:  http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html.

The EPA will continue to work closely with you to ensure the SIP revision process is as efficient as possible.  If

you or your staff have questions, please contact Anne Arnold, 617‐918‐1047.

David Conroy

Air Programs Branch

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1
2

Office: 617‐918‐1661

iPhone: 857‐829‐8239

Fax: 617‐918‐0661
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                                  SUBSIDIARIES

SEROLOGICALS CORPORATION

o        Serologicals Finance Company
         -        Serologicals License Company
         -        Serologicals Specialty Biologics, Inc.
                  *        Allegheny Biologicals, Inc.
                  *        Serologicals Ltd. (formerly known as Bioscot Ltd.)
                                    -        Bioscot Ltd.
                  *        Serologicals Investment Company
                  *        Serologicals Nevada, Inc.
                           *        Serologicals Trust Company
                                    -        Serologicals Investments LLC (1)
                                             -        Serologicals Management
                                                      Partnership, LP (2)
                  *        Serologicals Royalty Company
                  *        Bio-Lab, Inc.
                  *        Med-Lab, Inc.
         -        Serologicals Proteins, Inc.
         -        Serocor, Incorporated
                  *        Intergen Discovery Products, LLC
                  *        Bio Vest, Inc.
                  *        Intergen Biomanufacturing Corporation
o        Serologicals (Barbados), Inc. (FSC)

(1)      Serologicals Trust Company is the 99% limited partner in Serologicals
         Investments LLC. Serologicals Specialty Biologics, Inc. is the 1%
         general partner.


(2)      Serologicals Investments LLC is the 99% limited partner in Serologicals
         Management Partnership, LP. Serologicals Specialty Biologics, Inc. is
         the 1% general partner.

o        First tier subsidiary of Serologicals Corporation
         -        Second tier subsidiary
                  *        Third tier subsidiary
                           -         Fourth tier subsidiary
                                     -       Fifth tier subsidiary

Unless otherwise indicated, all subsidiaries are wholly owned
EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-85321, 33-21092, 33-41509, 33-41515,
33-50510, 33-80838 and 33-39091) of CyberOptics Corporation or our report dated
January 28, 2000 on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of
CyberOptics Corporation as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1999 which report is included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 28, 2000 relating to the financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                       PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 29, 2000
#### Emery Thompson Machine & Supply Company, appellee, v. Illinois Hydrox Company, formerly Hydrox Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,211.

Action to recover balance due for merchandise sold. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry Olson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Alfred E. MeCordie and Dent, Dobyns & Freeman, for

appellant.

D’Ancona & Pflaum, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1016 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5673) to advance responsible 

policies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2024 

Mr. MCGOVERN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5673) to 

advance responsible policies. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution, the House shall proceed to the consideration in 

3 the House of the bill (H.R. 5673) to advance responsible 

4 policies. All points of order against consideration of the 

5 bill are waived. An amendment in the nature of a sub6 stitute received for printing in the portion of the Congres7 sional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 

8 rule XVIII dated at least one day before the day of consid9 eration of H.R. 5673, if submitted by the ranking minority 

10 member of the Committee on Appropriations, shall be conVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:11 Feb 15, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1016.IH HR1016

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1016 IH 

1 sidered as adopted. If more than one such amendment is 

2 submitted, then only the last amendment submitted shall 

3 be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 

4 considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

5 in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 

6 shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, 

7 and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage 

8 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

9 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

10 minority member of the Committee on Appropriations or 

11 their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recom12 mit. 

13 SEC. 2. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to 

14 the consideration of H.R. 5673. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS