alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit99.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

                In connection with the Annual Report of LancerCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002,as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Mark L. Freitas, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                (1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

                (2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| March 26, 2003 | /s/ MARK L. FREITAS     |
|----------------|-------------------------|
|           | Mark L. Freitas,        |
|           | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
Exhibit
23.3






CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No.
333-153186) on Form S-8, pertaining to the 2007 Share Incentive Plan of CVD
Equipment Corporation of our report dated March 31, 2010 relating to our audit
of the consolidated financial statements, which appear in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of CVD Equipment Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2009.











/s/
MSPC


Certified
Public Accountants and Advisors,


A
Professional Corporation








Cranford,
New Jersey


March 31,
2010
# C_2008079EN.01002602.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/26

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 February 2008 — Orsay v OHIM — Jiménez Arellano (Orsay)

(Case T-378/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for the word and figurative trade mark Orsay - Earlier national word and figurative trade mark D'ORSAY - Ground for refusal - Risk of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 79/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Orsay GmbH (Willstät, Germany) (represented by: D. von Schultz and S. Elbe, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially, by: T. Eichenberg, later by: G. Schneider, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: José Jiménez Arellano S.A. (Madrid, Spain) (represented initially, by: J. Astiz Suárez, later by: S. Hernán-Carrillo Portolés and finally by: A. Tarí Lázaro, lawyers,

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2004 (Case R 909/2002-4) concerning an opposition procedure between José Jiménez Arellano S.A. and Orsay GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The application is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed;

| 2. | Orsay GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orsay GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314 of 18.12.2004.

1

---
### §306107. Planning and actions to minimize harm to National Historic Landmarks

Prior to the approval of any Federal undertaking that may directly and adversely affect any National Historic Landmark, the head of the responsible Federal agency shall to the maximum extent possible undertake such planning and actions as may be necessary to minimize harm to the landmark. The head of the Federal agency shall afford the Council a reasonable opportunity to comment with regard to the undertaking.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3226.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 306107 | 16 U.S.C. 470h–2(f). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §110(f), as added Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §206, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2996. |

Section
§ 2102.41 Fees. ( a ) Individuals will not be charged for: ( 1 ) The first copy of any record provided in response to a request for access or amendment;
( 2 ) The search for, or review of, records in NSC files;
( 3 ) Any copies reproduced as a necessary part of making a record or portion thereof available to the individual.
( b ) After the first copy has been provided, records will be reproduced at the rate of twenty-five cents per page for all copying of four pages or more.
( c ) The Staff Secretary may provide copies of a record at no charge if it is determined to be in the interest of the Government.
( d ) The Staff Secretary may require that all fees be paid in full prior to the issuance of the requested copies.
( e ) Remittances shall be in the form of a personal check or bank draft drawn on a bank in the United States, or a postal money order. Remittances shall be made payable to the “United States Treasury” and mailed to the Staff Secretary, National Security Council, Washington, DC 20506.
( f ) A receipt for fees paid will be given only upon request. Refund of fees paid for services actually rendered will not be made.
### SUBCHAPTER II—OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS
#### GIRVIN, Respondent, v. HUNTINGTON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Action by James C. Girvin against William S. Huntington.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

STOVER, J., not voting.
### §302503. Requirements for certification

(a) Approved State Program.—Any local government shall be certified to participate under this section if the applicable State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Secretary, certify that the local government—

(1) enforces appropriate State or local legislation for the designation and protection of historic property;

(2) has established an adequate and qualified historic preservation review commission by State or local legislation;

(3) maintains a system for the survey and inventory of historic property that furthers the purposes of chapter 3023;

(4) provides for adequate public participation in the local historic preservation program, including the process of recommending properties for nomination to the National Register; and

(5) satisfactorily performs the responsibilities delegated to it under this division.

(b) No Approved State Program.—Where there is no State program approved under sections 302301 and 302302 of this title, a local government may be certified by the Secretary if the Secretary determines that the local government meets the requirements of subsection (a). The Secretary may make grants to the local government certified under this subsection for purposes of this subdivision.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3197.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302503 | 16 U.S.C. 470a(c)(1) (2d, last sentences). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §101(c)(1) (2d, last sentences), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 915; Pub. L. 91–383, §11, as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1942; Pub. L. 93–54, §1(d), July 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 139; Pub. L. 96–205, title VI, §608(a)(1), (2), Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 92; Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §201(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2991. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "State program approved under section 302302 of this title" are substituted for "approved State program" for clarity.
#### In the Matter of Louise L. Johnson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Lawrence W. Bailey, Deceased, Respondent, v Ethel F. Sharpe, Also Known as Ethel F. Sharp, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered May 17, 1977 in Albany County, which, following reargument, adhered to its prior decision and order granting summary judgment to petitioner. Lawrence W. Bailey died intestate on September 28, 1974 as a result of an accident. At the time of his death, he was employed by Penn Central Railroad Corp., and he was insured under a *956group insurance policy issued by Travelers Insurance Company. The said policy did not name a designated beneficiary. Louise L. Johnson, the decedent’s natural mother, was appointed administratrix of decedent’s estate and, as such, she claimed the proceeds of the said policy. Ethel F. Sharpe also claimed the proceeds of the policy. Decedent had lived with Mrs. Sharpe and her husband as foster parents, for which the Sharpes were compensated by the Albany County Social Services Department. Decedent had not lived with the Sharpes for several years. As a result of the diverse claims to the proceeds of the policy, Travelers instituted an interpleader action and was discharged as a stakeholder by order of Supreme Court. Louise L. Johnson then moved for an order directing payment of the proceeds of the policy to her as administratrix of the decedent’s estate. Special Term treated the motion as one for summary judgment and granted the motion directing payment of the insurance proceeds to Mrs. Johnson. The only affidavit submitted in opposition to the motion for summary judgment was that of appellant’s attorney, who could not have any personal knowledge of the facts. Further, not even a semblance of evidentiary facts was submitted by appellant in opposition to the original motion. Special Term noted that the additional proof submitted on the motion for renewal and reargument was a report of a telephone conversation with a Mr. Lyons who stated that the deceased told him that he wanted to name appellant and her husband as beneficiaries rather than petitioner. The court found that "such evidence indicates at best that the deceased insured intended to designate the [appellant] or her husband as the beneficiaries of the subject life insurance, but it does not tend to show that he ever acted upon that intention.” The affidavit of an attorney who has no personal knowledge of the facts has no probative value and must be disregarded *(Chickering v Colonial Life Ins. of Amer.,*51 AD2d 566; *Israelson v Rubin,*20 AD2d 668). A burden rests upon the party opposing a motion for summary judgment to put forth evidentiary facts which present a triable issue of fact *(Capelin Assoc, v Globe Mfg. Corp.,*34 NY2d 338), and bald conclusory allegations are not enough to defeat summary judgment. Appellant has failed to present any triable issues of fact, and summary jugment was properly granted. Order affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
§ 1656.1 Purpose; definitions. ( a ) The provisions of this part govern the administration of registrants in Class 1-W and the Alternative Service Program.
( b ) The definitions of this paragraph shall apply in the interpretation of the provisions of this part: ( 1 ) *Alternative Service (AS).* Civilian work performed in lieu of military service by a registrant who has been classified in Class 1-W.
( 2 ) *Alternative Service Office (ASO).* An office to administer the Alternative Service Program in a specified geographical area.
( 3 ) *Alternative Service Office Manager (ASOM).* The head of the ASO.
( 4 ) *Alternative Service Work.* Civilian work which contributes to the maintenance of the national health, safety or interest, as the Director may deem appropriate.
( 5 ) *Alternative Service Worker (ASW).* A registrant who has been found to be qualified for service and has been ordered to perform alternative service (Class 1-W).
( 6 ) *Creditable Time.* Time that is counted toward an ASWs fulfillment of his alternative service obligation.
( 7 ) *Director.* The Director of Selective Service, unless used with a modifier.
( 8 ) *Employer.* Any institution, firm, agency or corporation engaged in lawful activity in the United States, its territories or possessions, or in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, that has been approved by Selective Service to employ ASWs.
( 9 ) *Job Assignment.* A job with an eligible employer to which an ASW is assigned to perform his alternative service.
( 10 ) *Job Bank.* A current inventory of alternative service job openings.
( 11 ) *Job Matching.* A comparison of the ASW's work experience, education, training, special skills, and work preferences with the requirements of the positions in the job bank.
( 12 ) *Job Placement.* Assignment of the ASW to alternative service work.
( 13 ) *Open Placement.* The assignment of ASWs without employer interview to employers who have agreed to employ all ASWs assigned to them up to an agreed number.
[48 FR 16676, Apr. 19, 1983, as amended at 69 FR 20544, Apr. 16, 2004]
Jeremiah W Oay) Nixon, Governor • Sara Parker Pauley, Director 

# T OF NATURAL RESOURCES

www.dnr.mo.gov
September 25,2015
Mr. Mark Hague Acting Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region VII 11201 Renner Boulevard Lenexa, KS 66219
Dear Mr. Hague: The Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' Air Pollution Control Program (Air Program) hereby submits the following: Area Boundary Recommendationsfor the 2010 I-hour Sulfur Dioxide Standard: July 2016 Designations Through this submittal, the Air Progran1 is requesting that EPA take these recommendations into consideration during the designation process to be completed by July 2, 2016. The state is recommending area designations (e.g., attainment, nonattainment, unclassifiable) for the 2010 I-hour S02 standard. The recommendations are based on technical evaluations using air quality modeling and monitoring data to address three parts ofthe State ofMissouri: the areas surrounding the Sikeston Power Station, Sibley Generating Station, and Ameren Labadie Energy Center. The EPA identified these three areas as meeting the criteria specified in the March 2,2015 Federal Consent Decree for the next round ofS02 designations. The EPA also identified the S02 monitor located in Iron County, Missouri as a violating n10nitor. Missouri is not making a recommendation on this monitor at this tin1e, and an evaluation ofthe monitor is included for informational purposes. The Missouri Air Conservation Commission adopted these recon1mendations at the September 24, 2015 commission meeting. A public hearing for the proposed recon1mendations was held on August 27 , 2015. A 30-day public comment period opened by July 27,2015 and closed on September 3 , 2015. During the public comment period for the proposed plan, the Air Program received several comments from many commenters. A summary ofthe comments received and our responses are attached.
In order to comply with Attachment A ofthe "Regional Consistency for the Administrative Requirements of State Implementation Plan Submittals and the Use of 'Letter Notices'" memo dated April 6, 2011 , a searchable pdfversion ofthis document will be emailed to the EPA Regional Office. Within three business days , this complete submittal package will be posted on 

# o Ree)'c1cd PaperMr. Mark Hague Page Two

our website at http: //dnr.nlo.gov/env/apcp/stateplans.htm. The disk included with this submittal also includes an electronic copy ofthe recommendation. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Ifyou have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Ms. En1ily Wilbur with the Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' Air Pollution Control Program at P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 or by telephone at (573) 751-4817. Sincerely,
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM 

## / ,A/l

# ~~**. X~(I/~**  Kyra L. Moore Director KLM:akc Enclosures: Copy ofrecommendations and appendices Copy ofpublic hearing notices Copy ofpublic hearing transcript introductory statement Copy ofrecommendation for adoption and summary of the comments and responses CD with electronic copy of the recommendations and appendices

c: Missouri Air Conservation Commission Project# 201 O-S02-4 Consent Decree
Exhibit 99.02-Certification  of Chief Financial Officer

 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Catherine Thompson, Chief Executive Officer  of  Ohana Enterprises, Inc. (The
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

   (1)  The amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Registrant, to
        which this certification is attached as an exhibit (The "Report"), fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(A) of The Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78M);

        And

   (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        registrant.

Date: May 20, 2003


 /s/ Catherine Thompson
     --------------
     Catherine Thompson
     Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
### §7513. Cause and procedure

(a) Under regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, an agency may take an action covered by this subchapter against an employee only for such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service.

(b) An employee against whom an action is proposed is entitled to—

(1) at least 30 days' advance written notice, unless there is reasonable cause to believe the employee has committed a crime for which a sentence of imprisonment may be imposed, stating the specific reasons for the proposed action;

(2) a reasonable time, but not less than 7 days, to answer orally and in writing and to furnish affidavits and other documentary evidence in support of the answer;

(3) be represented by an attorney or other representative; and

(4) a written decision and the specific reasons therefor at the earliest practicable date.

(c) An agency may provide, by regulation, for a hearing which may be in lieu of or in addition to the opportunity to answer provided under subsection (b)(2) of this section.

(d) An employee against whom an action is taken under this section is entitled to appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board under section 7701 of this title.

(e) Copies of the notice of proposed action, the answer of the employee when written, a summary thereof when made orally, the notice of decision and reasons therefor, and any order effecting an action covered by this subchapter, together with any supporting material, shall be maintained by the agency and shall be furnished to the Board upon its request and to the employee affected upon the employee's request.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title II, §204(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1136.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1101 of this title.
No. 8187.

#### Bowlus *v.*Cable.

(Decided December 15, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Mr. D. B. Austin*and *Mr. G. Harmon,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. 0. 8. Brumback*and *Mr. C. A. Thatcher,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Shauck and Crew, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Bioengineering Sciences and Technologies: AREA/REAP Review.
    Date: January 28, 2021.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: David Filpula, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 6181, MSC 7892, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
2902, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#284e4144585d44494c5a684549414406464140064f475e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b0d6d9dcc0c5dcd1d4c2f0ddd1d9dc9eded9d89ed7dfc6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 17, 2020.
Patricia B. Hansberger,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-28276 Filed 12-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors Cyanotech Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement Nos. 33-63789, 33-55310, and 333-42484on Form S-8 and 333-42486 and 333-101401 on Form S-3of Cyanotech Corporation of our reports dated June 16, 2006, except as to Note13, which is as of February 13, 2007 with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of Cyanotech Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006 and2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended March 31, 2006, and the relatedfinancial statement schedule, which reports appear in the March 31, 2006annual report on Form 10-K/A of Cyanotech Corporation.

As discussed in Note 13 to the consolidated financialstatements, the Company has restated its consolidated financial statements asof March 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the years in the three-year periodended March 31, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Honolulu,Hawaii

February 13, 2007

----
#### § 193.3 Policy.

In order to insure that the national defense is served by adequate, safe and efficient highway transportation, it shall be the policy of the DoD to (a) integrate the highway needs of the national defense into the civil highway programs of the various State and Federal agencies, and (b) cooperate with those agencies in matters pertaining to the use of public highways and in planning their development and construction.