83886 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 23, 2020 / Notices 

1See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from Mexico, the People’s Republic of China, and 

the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders; 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the 

Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 

FR 45403 (August 5, 2008) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

53411 (October 7, 2019) (Initiation Notice). The 

Initiation Notice listed 19 companies and 20 

company names since it included both the current 

and former versions of Regiopytsa’s company name. 

3Based on the record evidence in this review, we 

are preliminarily finding Regiomontana de Perfiles 

y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. to be successor-ininterest to Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. 

de C.V. For additional information on Commerce’s 

analysis regarding the successor-in-interest finding, 

see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the 

Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: LightWalled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico; 

2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum) at 6. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘2018–2019 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Light-Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: 

Respondent Selection,’’ dated October 22, 2019 

(Respondent Selection Memorandum) at 2–3 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational 

Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 

2020. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Light-Walled Rectangular 

Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Extension of Time 

Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated April 

17, 2020. 

LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT

ASSISTANCE—Continued 

[11/26/2020 through 12/10/2020] 

Firm name Firm address Date accepted 

for investigation Product(s) 

Midwest Precision, Inc ........... 9725 East Admiral Place, Tulsa, OK 74113 .. 12/10/2020 The firm manufactures miscellaneous metal

parts and assemblies. 

Any party having a substantial 

interest in these proceedings may 

request a public hearing on the matter. 

A written request for a hearing must be 

submitted to the Trade Adjustment 

Assistance Division, Room 71030, 

Economic Development Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten 

(10) calendar days following publication 

of this notice. These petitions are 

received pursuant to section 251 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Please follow the requirements set 

forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR 

315.9 for procedures to request a public 

hearing. The Catalog of Federal 

Domestic Assistance official number 

and title for the program under which 

these petitions are submitted is 11.313, 

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. 

Bryan Borlik, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 2020–28401 Filed 12–22–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–836] 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube From Mexico: Preliminary 

Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on light-walled 

rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico, 

covering the period August 1, 2018 

through July 31, 2019. We preliminarily 

find that Regiomontana de Perfiles y 

Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. (Regiopytsa) 

(successor-in-interest to Regiomontana 

de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V.) made 

sales of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value (NV) during the period of 

review (POR), and that Maquilacero S.A. 

de C.V. (Maquilacero) did not have sales 

of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review. We are also rescinding this 

review for 12 companies where timely 

requests for withdrawals were filed by 

all parties who requested the reviews. 

We invite interested parties to comment 

on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable December 23, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Samuel Brummitt or John Conniff, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–7851 or (202) 482–1009, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 7, 2019, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of the initiation of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order 1 on lightwalled rectangular pipe and tube from 

Mexico for 19 companies.2 On October 

22, 2019, we selected Maquilacero and 

Regiopytsa 3 for individual examination 

as the mandatory respondents in this 

administrative review.4

On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled 

all deadlines in administrative reviews 

by 50 days.5 On July 21, 2020, 

Commerce tolled all deadlines in 

administrative reviews by an additional 

60 days.6 On June 11, 2020, we 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results to November 18, 

2020.7 The deadline for the preliminary 

results of this review is now December 

16, 2020. 

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of the 

review, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

The signed and the electronic versions 

of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

A list of topics included in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

included in the Appendix to this notice. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the scope of 

the order are certain light-walled 

rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico. 

For a complete description of the scope, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party who requested the review 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 23, 2020 / Notices 83887 

8See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 2–3. 

9We preliminarily find that Regiomontana de 

Perfiles y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. is the successorin-interest to Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. 

de C.V. For further discussion, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

10See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

11See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

12See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also Temporary 

Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due 

to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020) (Temporary Rule). 

13See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

14See 19 CFR 351.303. 

15See Temporary Rule. 

16See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

17 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied 

the assessment rate calculation methodology 

adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 

of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the 

date of publication of notice of 

initiation of the requested review. On 

January 6, 2020, Independence Tube 

Corporation, a Nucor company, and 

Southland Tube, Incorporated, a Nucor 

company, timely withdrew their 

requests for an administrative review on 

the following 12 companies: Arco Metal 

S.A. de C.V.; Galvak, S.A. de C.V.; Hylsa 

S.A. de C.V.; Industrias Monterrey S.A. 

de C.V.; Internacional de Aceros, S.A. 

de C.V.; Nacional de Acero S.A. de C.V.; 

PEASA-Productos Especializados de 

Acero; Talleres Acero Rey S.A. de C.V.; 

Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V.; Tuberias 

Aspe S.A de C.V.; Tuberia Laguna, S.A. 

de C.V.; and Tuberias y Derivados S.A. 

de C.V. No other party requested a 

review of these 12 companies.8

Accordingly, we are rescinding this 

review, in part, with respect to these 

companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with sections 751(a)(2) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). Export price was calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value was calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

For the rate for companies not 

selected for individual examination in 

an administrative review, generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a 

market economy investigation. Under 

section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the allothers rate is normally ‘‘an amount 

equal to the weighted average of the 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margins established for exporters and 

producers individually investigated, 

excluding any zero or de minimis 

margins, and any margins determined 

entirely {on the basis of facts 

available}.’’ In this segment of the 

proceeding, we calculated a margin for 

Regiopytsa that was not zero, de 

minimis, or based on total facts 

available. Accordingly, we have 

preliminarily applied the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated for 

the non-examined companies in this 

review based on the weighted-average 

dumping margin calculated for 

Regiopytsa. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that, for 

the period August 1, 2018 through July 

31, 2019, the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist: 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. and 

Tecnicas de Fluidos S.A. de 

C.V .......................................... 0.00 

Regiomontana de Perfiles y 

Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V.9 ...... 5.44 

Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de 

C.V .......................................... 5.44 

Fabricaciones y Servicios de 

Mexico ..................................... 5.44 

Grupo Estructuras y Perfiles ...... 5.44 

Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V ............ 5.44 

Productos Laminados de 

Monterrey S.A. de C.V ............ 5.44 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We will disclose to parties to the 

proceeding the calculations performed 

in connection with these preliminary 

results of review within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice.10

Interested parties may submit case briefs 

not later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register.11 Rebuttal briefs, limited to 

issues raised in the case briefs, may be 

filed not later than seven days after the 

date for filing case briefs.12 Parties who 

submit case or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.13 Case and rebuttal briefs 

should be filed using ACCESS.14 Note 

that Commerce has temporarily 

modified certain of its requirements for 

serving documents containing business 

proprietary information, until further 

notice.15

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing must submit a written request 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance within 30 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice.16 Requests should contain: (1) 

The party’s name, address and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues 

parties intend to discuss. Issues raised 

in the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case and 

rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing 

is made, Commerce intends to hold the 

hearing at a time and date to be 

determined. Parties should confirm by 

telephone the date, time, and location of 

the hearing two days before the 

scheduled date. 

Unless extended, we intend to issue 

the final results of this administrative 

review, which will include the results of 

our analysis of all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, within 120 days 

of publication of these preliminary 

results in the Federal Register, pursuant 

to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

For individually examined 

respondents whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), we 

will calculate importer-specific ad 

valorem duty assessment rates based on 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).17 We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review when the importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is not zero or de 

minimis. If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

rate is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. The final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by this review 

where applicable. 

Regarding entries of subject 

merchandise during the period of 

review that were produced by 

Maquilacero and Regiopytsa and for 

which they did not know that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the all-others 

rate of 3.76 percent, as established in 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
83888 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 23, 2020 / Notices 

18See Order, 73 FR at 45405. 

19See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 

20See Order, 73 FR at 45405. 

1See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Results of New Shipper Review; 2012–2013, 

80 FR 41476 (July 15, 2015) (Final Results). 

2 Id. 

3See Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry 

Co., Ltd., et al. , v. United States, 322 F. Supp 3d 

1308 (CIT 2018) (Senmao I). 

4See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Order, Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood 

Industry Co., Ltd., et al. , v. United States, dated 

June 3, 2019 (First Remand Redetermination). 

5See Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry 

Co., Ltd., et al., v. United States, Court No. 15– 

00225. Slip Op. 20–31 (March 11, 2020) (Senmao 

II). 

6 Id. 

the less-than-fair-value investigation, if 

there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.18 For a full discussion of 

this matter, see Assessment Policy 

Notice.19

For those companies which were not 

individually examined, we will instruct 

CBP to assess antidumping duties at an 

ad valorem rate equal to that companies 

weighted-average dumping margin as 

determined in the final results of this 

review. 

In accordance with 19 CFR 356.8, we 

intend to issue liquidation instructions 

to CBP on or after 41 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be equal to 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies not 

listed above, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which they were reviewed; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or in the 

investigation but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be the all-others rate of 3.76 percent.20

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: December 16, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

V. Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

VI. Successor-in-Interest 

VII. Single Entity Treatment 

VIII. Discussion of the Methodology 

IX. Currency Conversion 

X. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2020–28347 Filed 12–22–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

ADMINISTRATION 

[A–570–970] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Court Decision Not in Harmony With 

the Final Results of the Second 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 10, 2020, the 

United States Court of International 

Trade (the Court) entered final judgment 

sustaining the final results of the second 

remand redetermination pursuant to 

court order by the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of multilayered wood flooring (MLWF) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) covering the period of review 

(POR), December 1, 2012 through 

November 30, 2013. Commerce is 

notifying the public that the final 

judgment in this case is not in harmony 

with Commerce’s final results in the 

2012–2013 administrative review of 

MLWF from China. 

DATES: Applicable December 20, 2020 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Aleksandras Nakutis, Office IV, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC, 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3147. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 15, 2015, Commerce 

published the Final Results in the 2012– 

2013 administrative review of 

multilayered wood flooring from China 

in which Commerce assigned a rate of 

13.74 percent to Jiangsu Senmao 

Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

(Senmao) and all separate rate 

respondents in the Final Results.1

Commerce applied the weighted-average 

dumping margin of Senmao (the only 

mandatory respondent to receive a rate 

that was not de minimis or based solely 

on adverse facts available) to all parties 

eligible for a separate rate, pursuant to 

section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act).2

Senmao and certain separate rate 

respondents appealed the Final Results. 

In its first remand order, the Court 

directed Commerce to reconsider or 

further explain certain of its surrogate 

value selections, its downward 

adjustment for irrevocable VAT, as well 

as its decision to deny voluntary 

respondent status to Fine Furniture 

(Shanghai) Limited (Fine Furniture).3

Upon reconsidering these issues in the 

First Remand Redetermination, 

Commerce made certain changes and 

calculated a revised weighted-average 

dumping margin for Senmao and the 

separate rate companies.4

In Senmao II, the Court affirmed the 

First Remand Redetermination as it 

pertained to the surrogate value 

selections.5 However, the Court found 

that Commerce’s downward adjustment 

for irrevocable VAT was contrary to law 

in relying upon an unlawful 

interpretation of the Act.6 The Court, 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES