alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
THIRD QUARTER 10 - Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH 10 - Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1997
<CASH>                                          26,329
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  187,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                       503
<INVENTORY>                                      6,670
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,312
<PP&E>                                          43,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 378,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,566
<BONDS>                                        152,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           385
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,980)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   378,481
<SALES>                                        843,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               843,665
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  806,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,781
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,351
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,433
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79
        


</TABLE>
#### § 877.10 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in §§ 877.11 and 877.13(b) were approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 44 U.S.C. 3507 and assigned clearance number 1029-0055. This information is being collected to meet the mandate of section 407 of the Act, which provides that States or Indian tribes, pursuant to an approved reclamation program, may use the police power, if necessary, to effect entry upon private lands to conduct reclamation activities or exploratory studies if the landowner's consent is refused or the landowner is not available.

This information will be used by the regulatory authority to ensure that the State/Indian tribe has sufficient programmatic capability to conduct reclamation activities on private lands. The obligation to respond is mandatory.
### §40905. Program to expand distance learning in rural underserved areas

(a) In General.—The Administrator shall develop or expand programs to extend science and space educational outreach to rural communities and schools through video conferencing, interpretive exhibits, teacher education, classroom presentations, and student field trips.

(b) Priorities.—In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator shall give priority to existing programs, including Challenger Learning Centers—

(1) that utilize community-based partnerships in the field;

(2) that build and maintain video conference and exhibit capacity;

(3) that travel directly to rural communities and serve low-income populations; and

(4) with a special emphasis on increasing the number of women and minorities in the science and engineering professions.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3393.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40905 | 42 U.S.C. 16791. | Pub. L. 109–155, title VI, §612, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2932. |

Section
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gordon Fink, Appellant.

Appeal from denial of a writ of error *coram nobis,*Supreme Court, Otsego County. Defendant appeals from an order dismissing a writ of error *coram nobis.*He argues that he was deprived of his constitutional right to a prompt trial. Appellant was indicted in Otsego County in November, 1954 for burglary, third degree, and grand larceny. He was returned to prison on violation of parole for an earlier conviction; and in 1956 he was tried for murder. In the course of this trial, an order of mistrial was granted; and, thereupon, with the advice of counsel, on July 17, 1956 defendant pleaded guilty to the 1954 indictment for burglary and grand larceny. No constitutional right to a prompt trial is shown violated on this record, which shows the voluntary plea of the defendant in 1956 to the 1954 indictment. Order unanimously affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of HCP, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   May 23, 2013 | /s/   JAMES F. FLAHERTY III                                                                    |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | James   F. Flaherty III*President and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HCP, Inc. and will be retained by HCP, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Quality Office Equipment Corporation, Respondent, v. Burroughs Corporation, Appellant.

Order, entered on September 9, 1963, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the contract alleged therein is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion to dismiss the complaint granted, with $10 costs. Even assuming that the “ speed-o-letter ” dated November 16, 1962 was something more than a mere invitation by defendant to plaintiff to enter into negotiations for the purchase of certain adding machines manufactured by defendant, and was in fact an offer to sell, it and the other documents relied upon by plaintiff do not constitute memoranda sufficient to satisfy the requirements of section 85 (subd. 1, par. [a]) of the Personal Property Law. They do not include certain essential terms of the contract alleged in the complaint. The memoranda collectively recite three different types of adding machines allegedly offered for sale by defendant, and discuss an order for two hundred of such otherwise unidentified machines; but there is no specification of the number of each model which were to comprise the aggregate number sold, or whether in fact the alleged order included all three models. Furthermore, the price list relied on by plaintiff indicates that there was a wide variance in price among the three specified models. Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00216

- CV

IN RE CONNIE RAY PAL MER RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandam us and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, DAUPHINOT, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 6 , 2013

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).
## Subpart H—Access to Criminal History Record Information
§ 1900.33 Allocation of resources; agreed extensions of time. ( a ) *In general.* Agency components shall devote such personnel and other resources to the responsibilities imposed by the Freedom of Information Act as may be appropriate and reasonable considering: ( 1 ) The totality of resources available to the component;
( 2 ) The business demands imposed on the component by the DCIA or otherwise by law;
( 3 ) The information review and release demands imposed by the Congress or other governmental authority; and
( 4 ) The rights of all members of the public under the various information review and disclosure laws.
( b ) *Discharge of FOIA responsibilities* — ( 1 ) *Chief FOIA Officer.* The Chief FOIA Officer shall monitor the Agency's compliance with the requirements of the FOIA and administration of its FOIA program. The Chief FOIA Officer shall keep the DCIA, the General Counsel of the CIA, and other officials appropriately informed regarding the Agency's implementation of the FOIA and make recommendations, as appropriate. The Chief FOIA Officer shall designate one or more CIA FOIA Public Liaisons. The CIA FOIA Public Liaison shall be responsible for assisting in reducing delays and assisting in the resolution of disputes between requesters and the Agency.
( 2 ) *Multi-track processing.* The Agency shall exercise due diligence in its responsibilities under the FOIA. The Agency shall designate a specific track for requests that are granted expedited processing, as set forth in § 1900.34. In addition, although the Agency will generally process requests and administrative appeals on a “first in, first out” basis, based upon a reasonable allocation of available resources, the Agency may designate additional processing queues that distinguish between simple and more complex requests based on the estimated amount of time or work needed to complete the processing of the request. The Agency may provide requesters in a slower queue an opportunity to limit the scope of their request in order to qualify for faster processing.
( c ) *Requests for extension of time.* When the Agency is unable to meet the statutory time requirements of the FOIA due to unusual circumstances, as defined in the FOIA, and the Agency extends the time limit on that basis, the Agency shall, before the expiration of the 20-business day time limit to respond, notify the requester in writing of the unusual circumstances involved and of an estimated date by which processing of the request is expected to be completed. When the extension exceeds 10 business days, the Agency shall, as described in the FOIA, provide the requester with an opportunity to modify the scope of the request or arrange an alternative time period for processing the original or modified request. CIA's FOIA Requester Service Center or the CIA FOIA Public Liaison are available to assist in this process. The Agency shall also alert the requester to the availability of the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) to provide dispute resolution services.
#### § 1803.32 Receipt, recording, and tasking.

The Coordinator shall promptly record each appeal received under this part, acknowledge receipt to the requester, and task the originator and other interested parties. Additional taskings, as required during the review process, shall be accomplished within ten (10) days of notification.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000766004
<NAME>                        Sbarro, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     usd

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-02-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         33812
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4786
<ALLOWANCES>                                   419
<INVENTORY>                                    3686
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               43770
<PP&E>                                         320926
<DEPRECIATION>                                 183694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 417833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          46314
<BONDS>                                        251310
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       71
<OTHER-SE>                                     110209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   417833
<SALES>                                        366630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               379464
<CGS>                                          73986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                48845
<INCOME-TAX>                                   19322
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   29523
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 1009—ADMINISTRATION**

Sec.
100901.
Authority of Secretary to carry out certain activities.
100902.
Rights of way for public utilities and power and communication facilities.
100903.
Solid waste disposal operations.
100904.
Admission and special recreation use fees.
100905.
Commercial filming.
100906.
Advisory committees.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: July 7, 2016 D-38-16 

 

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN

VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW

§ 468-a.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANDARDS, ON MOTION

Petitioner;

MICHELE V. McCORMICK,

Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 2250165)

 

Calendar Date: March 28, 2016

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

 

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,

Albany, for petitioner.

Michele V. McCormick, Essex, Massachusetts, respondent 

pro se.

 

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in

1989, was suspended by this Court's order dated September 24,

2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration

requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that

she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of
-2- D-38-16 

Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of

the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object

to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and she is ordered

reinstated, effective immediately.

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is

further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and

counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
AFS-11-350-E 

July 14, 2011 

 Exemption No. 8593C 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-12993 

Ms. Kathleen A. Yodice 

Counsel 

Stallion 51 Corporation 

411 Aviation Way, Suite 245 

Frederick, MD 21701 

Dear Ms. Yodice: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 8593, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated June 10, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Stallion 51 Corporation (Stallion 51), for an extension of Exemption No. 8593, as 

amended. That exemption from § 91.315 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

allows Stallion 51 to provide initial and recurrent training and training under contract with the 

U.S. military in its two North American TF-51 (TF-51) airplanes certificated as limited 

category civil aircraft. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Stallion 51. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8593, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and 

limitations below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Stallion 51 must continue to maintain its TF-51 aircraft in an airworthy condition in 

accordance with— 

a. The maintenance requirements specified in the TF-51 aircraft type 

specification sheet, as amended; 

b. An inspection program that meets the requirements of § 91.409; and 

c. Appropriate military technical manuals for the TF-51 aircraft. 

2. The pilot in command (PIC) must— 

a. Hold at least a commercial pilot certificate with a single-engine land airplane 

rating; 

b. Hold at least a second-class medical certificate; 

c. Hold a certificated flight instructor certificate with an airplane single-engine 

rating; 

d. Have completed TF-51 aircraft qualification and recurrent flight and ground 

training within the previous 12 calendar months; and 
 3

e. Have accomplished three takeoffs and three landings to a full stop in a TF-51 

aircraft within the previous 90 days before serving as PIC. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8593, as amended, to 

July 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

David C. Gillion 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

 

**Subsidiaries of Registrant**

 

North Pittsburgh Telephone Company, Penn Telecom, Inc. and Pinnatech, Inc. (which does business under the name “Nauticom”) are wholly-ownedsubsidiaries of the Registrant. The wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant are incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. In addition, Penn Telecom, Inc. owns 49.5% of Boulevard Communications, L.L.P., a Pennsylvania limited liabilitypartnership (Boulevard). The Registrant owns 50% of the voting capital stock of Multi, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, which in turn owns 1.0% of Boulevard. Neither Boulevard nor Multi, Inc. is considered a significant subsidiary. Penn Telecom,Inc.’s ownership of Boulevard and the Registrant’s ownership of Multi, Inc. are accounted for using the equity method.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1187 

Recognizing the 49th anniversary of Black April and the Fall of Saigon 

on April 30, 1975. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2024 

Mrs. STEEL (for herself and Mr. CORREA) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition 

to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 49th anniversary of Black April and the 

Fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975. 

Whereas, since 1975, hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese 

have resettled in the United States and built vibrant 

communities across the United States which contribute to 

the rich diversity of the Nation; 

Whereas, on April 30, 1975, the Republic of Vietnam was 

overthrown by communist forces in an event known as 

‘‘Black April’’ or the ‘‘Fall of Saigon’’, which is observed 

in Vietnamese-American communities across the United 

States each year; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1187 IH 

Whereas members of the South Vietnamese military fought 

side by side with the United States Armed Forces in defense of the ideals of democracy and freedom; 

Whereas Vietnamese Americans have continuously advocated 

for freedom and democracy in Vietnam, and spoken out 

against human rights abuses by the Vietnamese Government; and 

Whereas Vietnam continues to hold one of the worst records 

on human rights in the region, violating religious freedom, obstructing press freedom, restricting its own citizens’ freedom of speech and assembly, and detaining 

prisoners of conscience: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the significance of the 49th anni3 versary of Black April and the Fall of Saigon on 

4 April 30, 1975; 

5 (2) honors the contributions of Vietnamese 

6 Americans to the United States over the last 49 

7 years and their tireless commitment to upholding 

8 freedom, human rights, and democracy in Vietnam; 

9 (3) honors the service of members of the United 

10 States Armed Forces and of the South Vietnamese 

11 forces who fought in Vietnam, including those who 

12 gave their lives; 

13 (4) honors the memory of the Vietnamese who 

14 lost their lives while attempting to flee Vietnam; and 

15 (5) encourages all citizens of the United States 

16 to join in remembering Black April and the Fall of 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1187 IH 

1 Saigon, honoring the contributions of the Viet2 namese-American community, and calling for free3 dom, human rights, and democracy in Vietnam. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### §§ 1699.104-1699.109 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 784
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 784 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 784.18 Relocation or use of public roads. Each application shall describe, with appropriate maps and cross sections, the measures to be used to ensure that the interests of the public and landowners affected are protected if, under § 761.14 of this chapter, the applicant seeks to have the regulatory authority approve— ( a ) Conducting the proposed surface coal mining operations within 100 feet of the right-of-way line of any public road, except where mine access or haul roads join that right-of-way; or
( b ) Relocating a public road.
[44 FR 15366, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 64 FR 70838, Dec. 17, 1999; 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017]
#### § 219.112 Review by Institution

Research covered by this policy that has been approved by an IRB may be subject to further appropriate review and approval or disapproval by officials of the institution. However, those officials may not approve the research if it has not been approved by an IRB.
#### § 725.20 Administrative procedures.

The Agency shall follow administrative procedures governing accounting, payment property, and related requirements contained in Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102.