alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 8, 2006

|MS Structured Asset Corp.                         
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

|Delaware                                        | 333-101155                | 13-4026700                        
|----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                                               
|(State or Other Jurisdiction  of Incorporation) | (Commission File  Number) | (IRS Employer  Identification No.)



|1585 Broadway, Second Floor  New York, New York  Attention: Madhu Philips | 10036     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------
|                                                                         
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                                  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

|Not Applicable                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





---















Section 8Other Events



| | Item 8.01 | Other Events
| | --------- | ------------



Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS), AT&T Corp. Debenture Backed Series 2004-3 Trust (the Trust) (New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol HJH) has liquidated its assets and terminated. Settlement of a sale of the securities held by the Trust occurred on February 8, 2006, and a liquidation distribution was made with respect to the Units of the Trust on February 8, 2006.



In respect of the Class A Units, the amount of the distribution was $25.430 per Class A Unit, representing the full Unit Principal Balance of the Class A Units plus accrued interest in respect of the Class A Units through and excluding February 8, 2006.



In respect of the Class B Units, the amount of the distribution was $823.679 per $1,000 Initial Notional Amortizing Balance of Class B Units, representing the full Class B Present Value Amount as determined for value on February 8, 2006.





| |  | 
| |  | 





---











SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.



Date: February 14, 2006

MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.

(Registrant)

By: /s/ Madhu Philips

Name:    Madhu Philips
  Title:     Vice President





| |  | 
| |  | 





---
J. A15019/18

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

v. :

:

ROBIN DWAYNE SMITH, : No. 1927 MDA 2017

:

 Appellant :

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence, November 15, 2017,

in the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County

Criminal Division at No. CP-28-CR-0001098-2016

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., MURRAY, J., AND FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.

DISSENTING MEMORANDUM STATEMENT BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.:

FILED AUGUST 29, 2018

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s disposition in this matter. 

Although I agree that there exists ample support for the trial court’s 

determination that Officer Lynch possessed the requisite probable cause to 

stop appellant’s vehicle, based upon a violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3111(a), my

review of the record simply does not support the majority’s conclusion that 

appellant voluntarily consented to the blood draw. Quite the contrary, there 

are a number of factors in this case that weigh against a finding of 

voluntariness, including: the fact that appellant was placed in handcuffs when 

he was transported to the hospital; was under arrest at the time of the blood 

draw; and was not read a DL-26 form informing him of his right to refuse a 

blood draw. Our supreme court has held that, 
J. A15019/18

- 2 -

[i]n determining the validity of a given consent, the 

Commonwealth bears the burden of establishing that 

a consent is the product of an essentially free and 

unconstrained choice—not the result of duress or 

coercion, express or implied, or a will overborne—

under the totality of the circumstances. The standard 

for measuring the scope of a person’s consent is based 

on an objective evaluation of what a reasonable 

person would have understood by the exchange 

between the officer and the person who gave the 

consent. Such evaluation includes an objective 

examination of the maturity, sophistication and 

mental or emotional state of the defendant. Gauging 

the scope of a defendant’s consent is an inherent and 

necessary part of the process of determining, on the 

totality of the circumstances presented, whether the 

consent is objectively valid, or instead the product of 

coercion, deceit, or misrepresentation.

Commonwealth v. Smith, 77 A.3d 562, 573 (Pa. 2013) (internal citations,

quotation marks, and brackets omitted).

Based on the totality of circumstances, I do not believe that a reasonable 

person in appellant’s position would have understood that they were 

voluntarily consenting to a blood draw by simply choosing to remain silent. 

As such, without appellant’s consent and without a warrant, appellant’s blood

draw was an unlawful search under both the Fourth Amendment to the United 

States Constitution and Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. 

Accordingly, I would find that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s 

motion to suppress the results of his blood alcohol test.
### §308105. Battlefield restoration grant program

(a) Establishment.—The Secretary shall establish a battlefield restoration grant program (referred to in this section as the "program") under which the Secretary may provide grants to States, Tribes, local governments, and nonprofit organizations for projects that restore day-of-battle conditions on land preserved under the battlefield acquisition grant program established under section 308103(b).

(b) Eligible Sites.—The Secretary may make grants under this section for Revolutionary War, War of 1812, and Civil War battlefield sites eligible for assistance under the battlefield acquisition grant program established under section 308103(b).

(c) Federal Share.—The Federal share of the cost of a restoration project funded through a grant provided under the program shall be not more than 50 percent of the total cost of the project.

(d) Restoration Standards.—All restoration work carried out through a grant awarded under the program shall be performed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties under part 68 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations).

(e) Authorization of Appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to provide grants under this section $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2028.

(Added Pub. L. 116–94, div. P, title VII, §703(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3196.)
### §7131. Official time

(a) Any employee representing an exclusive representative in the negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement under this chapter shall be authorized official time for such purposes, including attendance at impasse proceeding, during the time the employee otherwise would be in a duty status. The number of employees for whom official time is authorized under this subsection shall not exceed the number of individuals designated as representing the agency for such purposes.

(b) Any activities performed by any employee relating to the internal business of a labor organization (including the solicitation of membership, elections of labor organization officials, and collection of dues) shall be performed during the time the employee is in a non-duty status.

(c) Except as provided in subsection (a) of this section, the Authority shall determine whether any employee participating for, or on behalf of, a labor organization in any phase of proceedings before the Authority shall be authorized official time for such purpose during the time the employee otherwise would be in a duty status.

(d) Except as provided in the preceding subsections of this section—

(1) any employee representing an exclusive representative, or

(2) in connection with any other matter covered by this chapter, any employee in an appropriate unit represented by an exclusive representative,

shall be granted official time in any amount the agency and the exclusive representative involved agree to be reasonable, necessary, and in the public interest.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title VII, §701, Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1214.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1101 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 13837

Ex. Ord. No. 13837, May 25, 2018, 83 F.R. 25335, which limited the use of taxpayer-funded union time by Federal employees in representing labor organizations and performing other non-agency business, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 14003, §3(b), Jan. 22, 2021, 86 F.R. 7231, set out in a note under section 3301 of this title.

[Ex. Ord. No. 13837, formerly set out above, construed to be amended to the extent necessary, by Memorandum of President of the United States, Oct. 11, 2019, 84 F.R. 56095, set out as a note under section 7101 of this title.]
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-21,310-05

EX PARTE RICHARD GROSS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 32004-A IN THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM ANDERSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to sixty years’ imprisonment. 

The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Gross v. State, No. 12-15-00280-CR (Tex.

App.—Tyler July 20, 2016) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a

writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends in three grounds that Mark Cargill, trial and appellate counsel, was

ineffective. On July 15, 2020, the habeas judge entered a timely order designating issues. The

1

 The following day, the habeas judge signed an order of recusal and requested that the 1

Presiding Administrative Judge assign a judge to this proceeding. 
2

district clerk properly forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded before findings of fact and

conclusions of law were made. We remand this application so the habeas judge who is assigned to

this proceeding can complete an evidentiary investigation and make findings and conclusions.

The habeas judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the habeas

judge’s findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other

things, affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts

from hearings and depositions. See TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be

requested by the habeas judge and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 16, 2020

Do not publish
#### § 219.124 Conditions.

With respect to any research project or any class of research projects the department or agency head of either the conducting or the supporting Federal department or agency may impose additional conditions prior to or at the time of approval when in the judgment of the department or agency head additional conditions are necessary for the protection of human subjects.
EXHIBIT 10(d)

AMENDMENTS TO THE
LONGS DRUG STORES CORPORATION
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN OF 1995

The following amendments to the Plan are adopted pursuant to Section 2 of the Plan:

1.

Section 3(e)
shall be amended by deleting it in its entirety and by substituting in its place the following:

(e) "Compensation Period." With respect to any year, one of the three month periods commencing with the first day of the
Company's first, second, third or fourth fiscal quarter.

2.

The
first paragraph of Section 5 shall be amended by deleting it in its entirety and by substituting in its place the following:



3.

The
chart in Section 5 shall be amended to read as follows:

|FORM OF COMPENSATION |  | COMPENSATION OR
PERFORMANCE PERIOD |  | FINAL ELECTION DATE                         
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Salary               |  | First Fiscal Quarter               |  | Day Preceding Start of First
Fiscal Quarter 
|Salary               |  | Second Fiscal Quarter              |  | Day Preceding Start of Second
Fiscal Quarter
|Salary               |  | Third Fiscal Quarter               |  | Day Preceding Start of Third
Fiscal Quarter 
|Salary               |  | Fourth Fiscal Quarter              |  | Day Preceding Start of Fourth
Fiscal Quarter
|First Quarter Bonus  |  | First Fiscal Quarter               |  | Day Preceding Start of First
Fiscal Quarter 
|Second Quarter Bonus |  | Second Fiscal Quarter              |  | Day Preceding Start of Second
Fiscal Quarter
|                     |  |                                    |  |                                             

1

---

|Third Quarter Bonus  |  | Third Fiscal Quarter  |  | Day Preceding Start of Third
Fiscal Quarter 
|-------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Fourth Quarter Bonus |  | Fourth Fiscal Quarter |  | Day Preceding Start of Fourth
Fiscal Quarter

4.

Section 7
shall be amended by deleting the second paragraph thereof it in its entirety and by substituting in its place the following:



* * * * * *



2

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0191 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER PARIS STOCKDALE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 5 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 1 2021

10/01/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0191
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LIFECORE
BIOMEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000028626
<NAME> LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         273,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,963,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   193,000
<INVENTORY>                                 21,133,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,546,000
<PP&E>                                      42,462,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,596,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,223,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,914,000
<BONDS>                                      6,449,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       126,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,734,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,223,000
<SALES>                                      7,896,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,896,000
<CGS>                                        4,168,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,295,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             216,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (606,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (606,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (606,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Hourly Earnings in Private Ship-Repair Yards, Spring 1943

              																	Myers, Robert J. (Robert Julius), 1912-2010					 and 	Quant, Willis C. 						*Hourly Earnings in Private Ship-Repair Yards, Spring 1943 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 763*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4247,			accessed on September 17, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 77.1302 Vehicles used to transport explosives. ( a ) Vehicles used to transport explosives, other than blasting agents, shall have substantially constructed bodies, no sparking metal exposed in the cargo space, and shall be equipped with suitable sides and tail gates; explosives shall not be piled higher than the side or end.
( b ) Vehicles containing explosives or detonators shall be maintained in good condition and shall be operated at a safe speed and in accordance with all safe operating practices.
( c ) Vehicles containing explosives or detonators shall be posted with proper warning signs.
( d ) Other materials or supplies shall not be placed on or in the cargo space of a conveyance containing explosives, detonating cord or detonators, except for safety fuse and except for properly secured nonsparking equipment used expressly in the handling of such explosives, detonating cord or detonators.
( e ) Explosives and detonators shall be transported in separate vehicles unless separated by 4 inches of hardwood or the equivalent.
( f ) Explosives or detonators shall be transported promptly without undue delays in transit.
( g ) Explosives or detonators shall be transported at times and over routes that expose a minimum number of persons.
( h ) Only the necessary attendants shall ride on or in vehicles containing explosives or detonators.
( i ) Vehicles shall be attended, whenever practical and possible, while loaded with explosives or detonators.
( j ) When vehicles containing explosives or detonators are parked, the brakes shall be set, the motive power shut off, and the vehicles shall be blocked securely against rolling.
( k ) Vehicles containing explosives or detonators shall not be taken to a repair garage or shop for any purpose.
### §30122. Contributions in name of another prohibited

No person shall make a contribution in the name of another person or knowingly permit his name to be used to effect such a contribution, and no person shall knowingly accept a contribution made by one person in the name of another person.

(Pub. L. 92–225, title III, §320, formerly §325, as added Pub. L. 94–283, title I, §112(2), May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 494; renumbered §320, Pub. L. 96–187, title I, §105(5), Jan. 8, 1980, 93 Stat. 1354.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 441f of Title 2, The Congress, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 320 of Pub. L. 92–225 was renumbered section 315, and is classified to section 30116 of this title.

Another prior section 320 of Pub. L. 92–225 was classified to section 441 of Title 2, The Congress, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–283.

Another prior section 320 of Pub. L. 92–225 was renumbered section 314, and is classified to section 30115 of this title.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T PA RV I N D ER K A U R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73009 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 576- 861 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P arvi nde rK aur , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f ora s y l um and 

# FI LED SEP 30 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 73009 2 w i thhol di ng of

r e m ova l . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e de ny th e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T h e B IA ad o p t edan daffi rm edth e IJ’ s d eci si o n i n cl u d i n g th e IJ’ s ad v erse c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n . See A bebe v. G on zales , 43 2 F . 3d 10 37 , 10 40 (9th C i r. 2005) ( e n banc ) ( w he r e the B I A c i t e s i t s de c i s i on i n M at te rof B ur bano , 2 0 I . & N . D e c . 872 ( B I A 1994) , and doe s note xpr e s s anydi s a gr e e m e ntw i th anypartof the IJ ’ s dec i si on , the B IA adop t s the IJ ’ s dec i si on i n i t s e nt i re ty) . In h ero p en in g b rief

, K au r f ails to ra ise a n y c h allen g e to th e a g en cy ’s d is p o s itiv e a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n . Se e M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 12 56 , 12 59 -60 (9th C i r. 19 96 ) ( i ss ues notspec i fi ca l l y r ai se d and ar gu ed ar e d e e me dw a i v e d ) . A c c o r d i n g l y , K au r ’ s a s y l u m an dw i th h o l d i n g o f r e mo v a l c l a i ms f a il. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.