alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of CyberOptics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Kathleen P. Iverson,
Chief Executive Officer, and Scott G. Larson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                                          |  |  |                           | 
| | -------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | ------------------------- | 
| |                                                          |  |  | /s/   Kathleen P. Iverson | 
| |                                                         
| | Kathleen P. IversonChief Executive OfficerMarch 14, 2005
| |                                                          |  |  | /s/   Scott G. Larson     | 
| |                                                         
| | Scott G. LarsonChief Financial OfficerMarch 14, 2005    

47

---
#### Central Bond & Mortgage Company, plaintiff in error, v. John Roeser, defendant in error.

Gen. No. 29,456.

Motion to vacate and set aside a judgment. Motion granted. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Daniel P. Trade, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 11, 1925.

Rehearing denied May 25; 1925.

Stebbins, Garey, L ’Amoreaux & Hurtubise, for plaintiff in error; Earl James Garey, of counsel.

Joseph G. Sheldon, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a)
      AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

          Dated: September 23, 2004         /S/ ANDREW R. PERZ
                 ---------------------      ----------------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: August 6, 2015 TO: File / Public Docket EPA

–R09

– OAR

– 2015
- FROM: Nicole Law , EPA Region 9, Air Rules Office RE: C all with San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Districts on July 29, 2015 regarding facilities using compliance fee option in SJVAPCD Rule 4702 between Nicole Law (EPA Region 9) and Errol Villegas (SJVAPCD) SJVAPCD (Errol) explained he obtained information regarding Rule 4702 from the southern region staff. The District is aware of 2 facilities that use the fee compliance option under rule 4702 for a total of 7 engines. EPA (Nicole) asked to clarify if these facilities were only located in the southern region of the District and whether this information is available for the entire District. Errol confirmed that although the southern region staff collected the information, it applies to the entire District. 2 facilities elect to use the compliance fee option and the majority of engines compl y with the limits of Table 2 in the rule.
### §222. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, R.S. §5318; act Jan. 28, 1915, ch. 20, §1, 38 Stat. 800, related to use of auxiliary vessels to enforce this chapter and was transferred to section 540 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
### **CHAPTER 3041—ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION**

Sec.
304101.
Establishment; vacancies.
304102.
Duties of Council.
304103.
Cooperation between Council and instrumentalities of executive branch of Federal Government.
304104.
Compensation of members of Council.
304105.
Administration.
304106.
International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property.
304107.
Transmittal of legislative recommendations, testimony, or comments to any officer or agency of the United States prior to submission to Congress.
304108.
Regulations, procedures, and guidelines.
304109.
Budget submission.
304110.
Report by Secretary to Council.
304111.
Reimbursements from State and local agencies.
304112.
Effectiveness of Federal grant and assistance programs.
# C_2008301EN.01003001.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/30

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — SGL Carbon v Commission

(Case T-68/04) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Principle of proportionality - Principle of equal treatment - Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover - Default interest)

(2008/C 301/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: SGL Carbon AG (Wiesbaden, Germany) (represented by: M. Klusmann and A. von Bonin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and W. Mölls, acting as Agents, and H.-J. Freund, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2004/420/EC of 3 December 2003 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case No C.38.359 — Electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products) and, in the alternative, an application for the reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant in that decision

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders SGL Carbon AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders SGL Carbon AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                           44,655
<SECURITIES>                                     9,065
<RECEIVABLES>                                    22,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,402
<INVENTORY>                                      176,069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 253,419
<PP&E>                                           106,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                   31,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   349,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            116,734
<BONDS>                                          130,993
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         122
<OTHER-SE>                                       82,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     349,455
<SALES>                                          1,100,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,100,851
<CGS>                                            887,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    887,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (8,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (8,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (8,830)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.72)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6419

TIMOTHY LEE SWEENEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-873-JFM) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 23, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Lee Sweeney, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Lee Sweeney appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sweeney v. Smith , No. CA-97-873-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1909.6 Designation of authority to waive need-to-know and grant historical access requests. ( a ) *The Agency Release Panel (ARP)* is designated to review requests and shall issue a recommendation to the Senior Agency Official who shall issue the final CIA decision whether or not to waive the need-to-know and grant requests for access by historical researchers, by former Presidential and Vice Presidential appointees and designees, or by former Presidents and Vice Presidents under Executive Order 13526 (or successor Orders) and these regulations.
( b ) *ARP Membership.* The ARP is chaired by the Director, Information Management Services and composed of the Chief, Information Review and Release Group, the Chief, Classification Management Program Office, the Information Review Officers from the various Directorates and the DCIA area, as well as the representatives of the various release programs and offices within CIA. The Information and Privacy Coordinator also serves as Executive Secretary of the ARP.
§ 57.7801 Jet drills. Jet piercing drills shall be provided with: ( a ) A system to pressurize the equipment operator's cab, when a cab is provided; and
( b ) A protective cover over the oxygen flow indicator.
Errata Sheet

Wyoming Greater Sage-Grouse LUP Amendment and Final Environmental Impact 

Statement

As of June 8, 2015 the following errata and clarifications to the FEIS are presented below.

Page Differences in the original text and the amendment are highlighted in gray

Appendix M

M-001 to M-336

Original Text:

All of Appendix M

Amendment:

The correct version is posted on the website at http://www.blm.gov/sagegrouse

Chapter 2

2-12

Original Text:

2.6.3 BLM Proposed LUP Amendments 

Amendment:

2.6.2 BLM Proposed LUP Amendments

Chapter 2

2-64

Original Text:

2.6.4 Forest Service Proposed LUP Amendments

Amendment:

2.6.3 Forest Service Proposed LUP Amendments

Chapter 2

2-64

Original Text:

GRSG-GRSGH-ST-003-Standard - Design habitat restoration projects to move 

towards the desired conditions in table 1 and incorporate the concepts outlined in 

Appendix C - Reclamation Plan and Appendix D - Monitoring Framework.

Amendment:

GRSG-GRSGH-ST-003-Standard - Design habitat restoration projects to move 

towards the desired conditions in Table 2-5 and incorporate the concepts outlined in 

Appendix C - Reclamation Plan and Appendix D – Implementation Framework.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     See accompanying notes
     $ in thousands, except per share data
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-26-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         25111
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11338
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    13090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               82309
<PP&E>                                         63451
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33928
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       245
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149501
<SALES>                                        209203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          136225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (693)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9776
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3534
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .84
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 1350 Certificationof the**

**Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, James R. Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra ElectronicsCorporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofCobra Electronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30,2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofCobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.

 

 
|   | /s/  James R. Bazet     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | James  R. Bazet         |
|   | November 12,  2010 |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1040

In re: DEANDRE JOHNSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:20-cv-00474-RAJ-LRL)

Submitted: February 21, 2023 Decided: February 24, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deandre Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1040 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Deandre Johnson petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the 

district court to grant relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, which the district court denied 

in August 2022. We conclude that Johnson is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Mandamus relief is available only when the 

petitioner “has no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires” and demonstrates 

“a clear and indisputable right” to that relief. Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration 

and internal quotation marks omitted). Further, mandamus may not be used as a substitute 

for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

The relief sought by Johnson is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, 

we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1040 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Fact Sheet

April 22, 2009 | www.mcc.gov

MCC: Matching a Commitment to 

Conservation Abroad with Compliance 

and Innovation at Headquarters 

Recent legislation, including the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of February 2009, and the Energy 

Independence and Security Act of December 2007, highlight the importance of energy efficiency and conservation efforts across the U.S. domestic economy and, in particular, within the federal government – which by many 

reports is the world’s largest energy consumer.

MCC believes that energy and resource conservation reflect its core values and commitment to sustainability. 

Even though the provisions referenced in the legislation do not generally apply to MCC because the agency 

headquarters is not in a federally-owned building, the agency is commitment to principles laid out in the legislation and has completed an initial audit of its headquarter operations to assess energy and resource consumption 

and identify opportunities to improve its environmental performance in a manner consistent with the tenor and 

substance of these laws.

MCC Headquarters Conservation Plan

In undertaking near-term opportunities for improvements in this area, MCC has already taken steps to reduce 

the impact of its headquarters operations on the environment. MCC paper now contains 100% post-consumer 

recycled content and MCC is pursuing strategies that will significantly reduce its paper consumption. The organization is now eliminating most non-biodegradable food service items (cups, plates, plastic ware). While much of 

MCC’s space already has motion sensors to automatically turn off lights when no one is around, MCC will make 

further investments to complete the installation of additional sensors, where needed, in its Washington offices. In 

addition, MCC is educating staff on the need to turn off lights and change energy use behaviors so that the organization can contribute to reducing costs and minimizing impacts on the environment from its energy consumption. 
MCC: Matching a Commitment to Conservation Abroad with Compliance and Innovation at Headquarters , April 22, 2009 2

Going forward, MCC is committed to systematically addressing energy, travel and overall consumption impacts 

on the environment. The organization is working to create incentives to reduce costs, energy and resource consumption, and looking at commuting and alternatives to travel, where appropriate, to address its carbon footprint. 

Building on these efforts, MCC has already begun working to engage on our longer-term goals, including offsetting carbon emissions, practicing green procurement and enhancing recycling efforts.

These efforts are consistent with MCC’s core commitment to sustainability and will align MCC headquarter operations with the Obama administration’s efforts to increase energy efficiency and conservation within the federal 

bureaucracy.
§ 222.4 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Director, Washington Headquarters Services, shall process MDR requests for OSD, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, and DoD Components not listed in the Appendix A to this part.
( b ) *Heads of the DoD Components.* The Heads of the DoD Components listed in the Appendix A to this part shall: ( 1 ) Establish procedures for the processing of MDR requests and appeals for information originating within the Component.
( 2 ) Appoint an appellate authority to adjudicate MDR appeals for the Component.
**Exhibit
      32**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Diapulse Corporation
      of America (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned,
      being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
            Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
              the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.


Date: August
              12, 2008
            By:
            /s/ David
              Mr.
              RossDavid
                M. Ross
              President,
                  Chief Executive Officer and
                Principal
                  Financial Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Diapulse Corporation of America and will be retained by Diapulse Corporation
      of
      America and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.




18