alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

 

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

I, Glen R. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of CVD Equipment Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2017 of CVD Equipment Corporation (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CVD Equipment Corporation.

 

 

| Dated: May 1, 2018 | /s/ Glen R. Charles           |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                    | Glen R. Charles               |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                    | (Principal Financial Officer) |
<PAGE>   1
                                  10-K/A NO. 1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                         ------------------------------

                       AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OR REPORT
                  FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12, 13 OR 15 (d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                            SECURITY BANC CORPORATION
               (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN CHARTER)

The undersigned registrant hereby amends the following items, financial
statements, exhibits or other portions of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1996, as set forth in the pages attached hereto:

     ITEM 14 EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

The following financial statement with respect to the Security National Bank and
Trust Co. 401(k) Profit Sharing Savings Plan (the "Plan") are filed herewith as
Exhibit 28.1, pursuant to Rule 15d-21 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
in lieu of a filing on Form 11-K:

     (a)  Report of Independent Auditors

     (b)  Statements of Assets Available for Distribution to Plan
          Participants-December 31, 1996 and 1995

     (c)  Statements of Changes in Assets Available for Distribution to Plan
          Participants - years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995

     (d)  Notes to Financial Statements

     (e)  Schedule of Assets Held for Investment - December 31, 1996

     (f)  Schedule of Transactions or Series of Transactions in Excess of 5% of
          the current value of Plan Assets - year ended December 31, 1996

The Plan is subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as
amended, and the foregoing financial statements are filed in lieu of the
financial statements required by Items 1, 2, and 3 of Form 11-K.

The Consent of the Plan's independent auditors to the inclusion of the foregoing
financial statements herein and to the incorporation by reference of such
financial statements in the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8
pertaining to the Plan is attached as EXHIBIT 24.1.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SECURITY BANC CORPORATION


By /s/ Thomas L. Miller                        Date:    June 5, 1997
   -------------------------------------------       ------------------------
   Thomas L. Miller    
   Vice President/Controller

                                         TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES:  17

(162)
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 2, 2020.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1622

Lower Tribunal No. 17-25120

________________

VME Group International, LLC, etc., et al.,

Petitioners,

vs.

The Grand Condominium Association, Inc., etc., et al.,

Respondents.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Prohibition.

Law Offices of Karen J. Haas, and Karen J. Haas, for petitioners.

Roniel Rodriguez, IV, P.A., and Roniel Rodriguez, IV; Cole, Scott & Kissane,

P.A., and Scott A. Cole, for respondents.

Before EMAS, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

VME Group International, LLC files a petition for writ of prohibition, seeking 

review of the trial court’s order denying VME’s motion for disqualification of the 

trial judge. 

The petition is based upon documented activity occurring in August of 2018. 

The motion to disqualify was filed in September of 2020. Neither the motion nor its 

attachments contain any averment or allegation regarding when these facts were 

discovered, nor any averment or allegation (save for a conclusory statement) that the 

motion was filed in a timely manner. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(e) (providing: 

“A motion to disqualify shall be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days 

after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion . . . ”). See State 

v. Oliu, 183 So. 3d 1161, 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (stating: “While these allegations 

give rise to an objectively reasonable fear of bias or prejudice requiring 

disqualification of the trial judge, we are compelled to deny the petition for writ of 

prohibition because the motion to disqualify the trial judge was not timely filed.”) 

Although we are compelled to deny the petition, we note that the Florida Rules 

of Judicial Administration permit a judge to enter an order of disqualification on her 

own initiative. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(i) (providing: “Judge’s Initiative. 

Nothing in this rule limits the judge’s authority to enter an order of disqualification 

on the judge’s own initiative”); Oliu, 183 So. 3d 1163. 

Petition denied.
#### § 1903.13 Under the influence while on an Agency installation.

Presence on an Agency installation when under the influence of alcohol, a drug, or a controlled substance or a combination thereof to a degree that interferes with, impedes or hinders the performance of the official duties of any government employee, or damages government or personal property is prohibited.
#### § 1602.12 Governor.

The word *Governor* includes, where applicable, the Governor of each of the States of the United States, the Mayor of the District of Columbia, the Governor of Puerto Rico, the Governor of the Virgin Islands, and the Governor of Guam.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
Serologicals Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 28,
2003 (the "Report") as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 2, 2004



/s/ David A. Dodd
----------------------------
David A. Dodd
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement



 EXHIBIT 4.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE RIGHTS AGREEMENT, effective as of
March 4, 2004 (the “Amendment”), among RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., formerly known as Alpha 1 Biomedical, Inc. (the “Company”) and American Stock Transfer & Trust. (the “Rights Agent”). 

WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Rights Agreement, dated as of April 29, 1994 (the “Agreement”);

 WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to modify and further amend the Agreement as set forth herein; 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26 of the Agreement, the Company may amend the Agreement without the approval of the Rights Agent or any holder of the rights
described therein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as
follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment to Section 7(a) of the Agreement. 

 Section 7(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 (a) Subject
to Section 7(e) and except as otherwise provided herein (including Section 11), each Right shall entitle the registered holder thereof, upon exercise thereof as provided herein, to purchase for the Purchase Price, at any time after the
Distribution Date and at or prior to the earlier of (i) the close of Business on the 20th anniversary of the
date of this Rights Agreement (the Close of Business on such date being the “Expiration Date”, or (ii) the Redemption Date, the one-thousandth (1/1,000) of a Preferred Share, subject to adjustment from time to time as provided in
Sections 11 and 12. 
  

	 	2.	Miscellaneous. 

 (a) The Agreement
is incorporated herein by reference. 
 (b) Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Agreement, as amended hereby, shall
remain in full force and effect and the parties shall have all the rights and remedies provided thereunder with the same force and effect as if the Agreement were restated herein in its entirety. 
 (c) The provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective executors, heirs, personal
representatives, successors and assigns. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date first above written. 
  

	
	REGENERX BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	
	 /s/ J.J. Finkelstein

	J.J. Finkelstein
	President and Chief Executive Officer
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ronald Wayne Sanders, * From the 42nd District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 24915A.

Vs. No. 11-12-00151-CR * August 7, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1
                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Cyanotech Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-63789
and  33-55310 on Form S-8 of  Cyanotech  Corporation  of our report dated May 5,
2000, relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Cyanotech  Corporation and
subsidiaries  as of  March  31,  2000 and  1999,  and the  related  consolidated
statements of  operations,  stockholders'  equity and cash flows for each of the
years  in  the  three-year   period  ended  March  31,  2000,  which  report  is
incorporated  by reference  in the 2000 annual  report on Form 10-K of Cyanotech
Corporation.  We also consent to  incorporation by reference of our report dated
May  5,  2000  relating  to  the  financial   statement  schedule  of  Cyanotech
Corporation and  subsidiaries in the  aforementioned  2000 annual report on Form
10-K, which report is included in said Form 10-K.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Honolulu, Hawaii
June XX, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9974 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9974

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the health care 
          benefits available for Gold Star surviving spouses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2024

 Ms. Kaptur (for herself and Mr. Bacon) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the health care 
          benefits available for Gold Star surviving spouses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gold Star Spouses Health Care 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF HEALTH CARE BENEFITS FOR GOLD STAR SURVIVING 
              SPOUSES.

    (a) Medical Benefits.--Section 1079(g) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``except as provided by 
        paragraph (5),'' after ``benefits under paragraph (1),''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:
    ``(5)(A) A dependent described in subparagraph (B) shall not be 
subject to the three-year time limit specified in paragraph (2) with 
respect to eligibility for benefits under TRICARE Prime.
    ``(B) A dependent described in this subparagraph is a dependent for 
purposes of section 1072 of this title by reason of being a surviving 
spouse of a member of the armed forces whose death is covered by 
section 1126.''.
    (b) Dental Benefits.--Section 1076a(k) of such title is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``Such term'' and 
        inserting ``Except as provided by paragraph (4), such term''; 
        and
            (2) by adding after paragraph (3) the following:
    ``(4)(A) A dependent described in subparagraph (B) shall not be 
subject to the three-year time limit specified in paragraph (3).
    ``(B) A dependent described in this subparagraph is a dependent for 
purposes of section 1072 of this title by reason of being a surviving 
spouse of a member of the armed forces whose death is covered by 
section 1126.''.
    (c) Application.--The amendments made by this section shall apply 
with respect to a surviving spouse of a member of the Armed Forces 
whose death is covered by section 1126 of title 10, United States Code, 
regardless of whether such death occurred before the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 163-164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90802; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2020-042]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Accommodate Exchange Listing 
and Trading of Options-Linked Securities

December 28, 2020.
    On May 15, 2020, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ 
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to permit Exchange 
listing and trading of Options-Linked Securities. The proposed rule 
change was

[[Page 164]]

published for comment in the Federal Register on June 3, 2020.\3\ On 
July 9, 2020, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the 
Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the 
proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute 
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule 
change.\5\ On September 1, 2020, the Commission instituted proceedings 
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to 
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On November 17, 
2020, the Commission designated a longer period within which to issue 
an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change.\8\ The 
Commission received no comment letters on the proposed rule change. On 
December 23, 2020, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-
CboeBZX-2020-042).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88968 (May 28, 
2020), 85 FR 34270.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89267, 85 FR 42933 
(July 15, 2020).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89722, 85 FR 55337 
(September 4, 2020).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90444, 85 FR 74777 
(November 23, 2020). The Commission designated January 29, 2021, as 
the date by which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove 
the proposed rule change.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-29019 Filed 12-31-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1225 

Expressing support for the designation of June, 9, 2024 in June as ‘‘Veterans 

Get Outside Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2024 

Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. MOULTON, and Mr. AMO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of June, 9, 2024 

in June as ‘‘Veterans Get Outside Day’’. 

Whereas between 2000 and 2023, the Secretary of Defense 

found that more than 460,000 members of the Armed 

Forces were diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries; 

Whereas studies have found that, after decades of combat in 

Afghanistan and Iraq, 20 percent of veterans suffer from 

post-traumatic stress and depression; 

Whereas the Secretary of Veterans Affairs found that veterans suffer a disproportionately higher rate of suicide 

compared to non-veterans, and post-traumatic stress, 

traumatic brain injury, depression, and anxiety are root 

causes of the suicide epidemic in the veteran community, 

with an estimated 17.5 suicides per day in 2021; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1225 IH 

Whereas, despite a strong effort by Congress and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to reduce veterans suicides, 

there are still gaps in mental health care for veterans, 

and the United States needs to use every treatment available to support the veteran community; 

Whereas studies have shown that exposure to nature and the 

outdoors have a positive therapeutic impact on mental 

health, including by resulting in lower risks of depression 

and improved focus and attention, and even a single day 

outside can improve an individual’s overall mood and 

lessen feelings of isolation; 

Whereas studies have found that individuals with increased 

access to green space have a lower suicide risk; 

Whereas the Forest Service sponsors a National Get Outdoors Day on the second Saturday in June to promote 

the health benefits of outdoor recreational activities; 

Whereas the National Park Service sponsors a National Get 

Outdoors Month in June to promote the health benefits 

of outdoor recreational activities; 

Whereas the United States has recognized the need to connect veterans with nature by providing free admission to 

national parks and forests; and 

Whereas a targeted outreach effort, such as Veterans Get 

Outside Day, to veterans living with post-traumatic 

stress, traumatic brain injury, depression, and anxiety 

may lead to further participation in outside events and 

improved mental health outcomes: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses support for the designation of 

3 ‘‘Veterans Get Outside Day’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1225 IH 

1 (2) encourages the Secretary of Veterans Af2 fairs, the Chief of the Forest Service, and the Direc3 tor of the National Park Service to coordinate and 

4 cooperate in promoting ‘‘Veterans Get Outside Day’’ 

5 with National Get Outdoors Day and Get Outdoors 

6 Month. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 780
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54949, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 780 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 780.11 Operation plan: General requirements. Each application shall contain a description of the mining operations proposed to be conducted during the life of the mine within the proposed permit area, including, at a minimum, the following: ( a ) A narrative description of the type and method of coal mining procedures and proposed engineering techniques, anticipated annual and total production of coal, by tonnage, and the major equipment to be used for all aspects of those operations; and
( b ) A narrative explaining the construction, modification, use, maintenance, and removal of the following facilities (unless retention of such facilities is necessary for postmining land use as specified in § 816.133): ( 1 ) Dams, embankments, and other impoundments;
( 2 ) Overburden and topsoil handling and storage areas and structures;
( 3 ) Coal removal, handling, storage, cleaning, and transportation areas and structures;
( 4 ) Spoil, coal processing waste, and non-coal waste removal, handling, storage, transportation, and disposal areas and structures;
( 5 ) Mine facilities; and
( 6 ) Water and air pollution control facilities.
[44 FR 15357, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 51550, Aug. 4, 1980; 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54949, Nov. 17, 2017]
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Robert Christopher Young, Appellant

No. 06-17-00195-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 276th District Court of 

Marion County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F14829). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess 

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by deleting the assessment of 

$350.00 in attorney fees. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Robert Christopher Young, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 2, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk