alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 10, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00454

- CV

Jeremy DELGADO, Appellant

v.

Charlene MENDEZ

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 10408
Honorab le Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late record, stating that the appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk ’ s record and that the appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee

.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk ’ s fee has been paid or arrangements have be en made to pay the clerk ’ s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk ’ s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appeal if appellant fails to comply with an order of this court).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set m y hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 10th day of August, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
§ 1605.25 Disqualification. ( a ) No member of a district appeal board shall act on the case of a registrant who is the member's first cousin or closer relation, either by blood, marriage, or adoption, or who is the member's employer, employee, or fellow employee, or stands in the relationship of superior or subordinate of the member in connection with any employment, or is a partner or close business associate of the member, or is a fellow member or employee of the board.
( b ) A member of a district appeal board must disqualify himself in any matter in which he would be restricted for any reason in making an impartial decision.
( c ) Whenever a quorum of the district appeal board or a panel thereof cannot act on the case of a registrant that it has been assigned, and there is no other panel of the district appeal board to which the case may be transferred, the district appeal board shall transmit such case to the director of Selective Service for transfer to another district appeal board.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1318 

Recognizing the Museum of Pop Culture in Seattle, Washington, as the 

‘‘National Museum of Pop Culture’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2024 

Ms. JAYAPAL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the Museum of Pop Culture in Seattle, 

Washington, as the ‘‘National Museum of Pop Culture’’. 

Whereas the Museum of Pop Culture in Seattle, Washington, 

is the flagship museum in the United States dedicated to 

the preservation and scholarship of pop culture and pop 

culture history; 

Whereas the Museum of Pop Culture acknowledges the universal language of pop culture and its ability to challenge 

society to uplift voices, inspire generations, and challenge 

societal paradigms; 

Whereas the Museum of Pop Culture explores the dynamic 

force of pop culture and how it shapes our perspective 

and conversations by delving into iconic moments, trends, 

creators, and creations that leave a lasting mark on our 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1318 IH 

collective consciousness and the profound impact of pop 

culture on our lives; 

Whereas the Museum of Pop Culture’s meticulous and dedicated efforts transcend traditional notions of museumworthiness, actively preserving the history of pop culture 

and honoring narratives that challenge established stories; 

Whereas the Museum of Pop Culture, through scholarship 

and shared expertise, catalyzes a new understanding of 

the significance of pop culture, contributing to a broader 

and more inclusive perspective; 

Whereas the Museum of Pop Culture pays tribute to how pop 

culture has shaped many different forms of creative expression, from fashion, music, visual art, television, film, 

and more; 

Whereas the Museum of Pop Culture proudly celebrates and 

preserves one of the world’s largest collections of pop culture artifacts and oral histories, including several of the 

largest collections of artifacts related to hip-hop, science 

fiction, Jimi Hendrix, and the original ‘‘Star Trek’’, recognizing pop culture as a cultural art form with global 

significance; 

Whereas the Museum of Pop Culture serves as a unique and 

valuable resource locally and nationwide in expanding 

knowledge of the importance of pop culture and pop culture history and its impact globally; and 

Whereas it is appropriate to designate the Museum of Pop 

Culture in Seattle, Washington, as the ‘‘National Museum of Pop Culture’’: Now, therefore, be it 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1318 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the Museum of Pop Culture in Seattle, Washington, 

3 as the ‘‘National Museum of Pop Culture’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1312 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1312

    Expressing support for the designation of July 2024 as Veterans 
                          Appreciation Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2024

Mr. Van Drew submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for the designation of July 2024 as Veterans 
                          Appreciation Month.

Whereas United States veterans have answered the Nation's call to serve;
Whereas veterans fought the Nation's battles in the air, on land, and on sea;
Whereas the brave men and woman who served in the United States Armed Forces 
        made great sacrifices to protect the freedom and democracy of the United 
        States;
Whereas United States veterans willingly placed the well-being of the Nation 
        above their own;
Whereas given their immense sacrifice and bravery, veterans deserve to be 
        honored during the entire month of November and throughout the year;
Whereas July, a time when America celebrates its independence and freedom, 
        serves as a fitting occasion to recognize the pressing issues faced by 
        veterans and the imperative to ensure that all individuals who have 
        served in the United States Armed Forces are adequately cared for and 
        protected; and
Whereas the people of the United States are proud of the courageous service of 
        all who served in the United States Armed Forces: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of Veterans Appreciation Month.
                                 <all>
```
#### Samuel S. Solow et al., Respondents, v Victor Herbert, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 28, 1978, affirmed for the reasons stated by Fraiman, J., at Special Term. Respondents shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Fein and Markewich, JJ.

Silverman, J., dissents in the following memorandum:

I would grant the motion to dismiss the complaint. In my view the allegedly defamatory statements were protected by the Federal doctrine of absolute privilege as being "within the outer perimeter of [defendant’s] line of duty” *(Barr v Matteo,*360 US 564, 575; *Savarirayan v English,*45 Ill App 3d 105).
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00830-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.O.G., a Child

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PA-01327

Honorable Victor Hugo Negron Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 7, 2012

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

A complete appellate record for this appeal was filed in this court on December 20, 2011. 

Since this appeal is accelerated, the deadline for filing the appellant’s brief was January 9, 2012. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). On December 22, 2011, the appellant filed a copy of an agreed order of 

referral to mediation signed by the trial court based on its consideration of a motion for new trial. 

The order stated that the mediation was set for January 12, 2011. 

Based on the agreed order, this court issued an order on January 17, 2012, granting 

appellant an extension of time to file her brief to February 1, 2012. The order stated that if the 

underlying cause was settled through mediation, appellant was required to file a motion 

requesting an appropriate disposition of the appeal no later than February 1, 2012.
04-11-00830-CV

- 2 -

The clerk’s office of this court contacted appellant’s attorney and was informed that a 

non-suit had been obtained and a motion to dismiss this appeal would be filed. Despite 

representations that the motion would be filed in a short time period, no motion was filed. On 

February 17, 2012, appellant was ordered to file the appellant’s brief in this appeal no later than 

February 27, 2012. Appellant was cautioned that if the brief was not filed by the deadline, the 

appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3.

Appellant’s brief has not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of 

prosecution.

PER CURIAM
IES Order Number 

This section contains 

Confidential Business Information 

This Page Intentionally Blank
EXHIBIT 32.1



Statement Pursuant to Section 1350(a) of title 18, United States Code



The undersigned, Richard F. Zannino and Christopher W. Vieth, certify that:





|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the Form 10-Q), which is being filed today with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. | 
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 







|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 





|/s/ Richard F. Zannino   
|-------------------------
|Richard F. Zannino       
|Chief Executive Officer  
|Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
|                         
|Date: May 4, 2006        
|                         
|/s/ Christopher W. Vieth 
|Christopher W. Vieth     
|Chief Financial Officer  
|Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
|                         
|Date: May 4, 2006
### §559. Effect on other laws; effect of subsequent statute

This subchapter, chapter 7, and sections 1305, 3105, 3344, 4301(2)(E), 5372, and 7521 of this title, and the provisions of section 5335(a)(B) of this title that relate to administrative law judges, do not limit or repeal additional requirements imposed by statute or otherwise recognized by law. Except as otherwise required by law, requirements or privileges relating to evidence or procedure apply equally to agencies and persons. Each agency is granted the authority necessary to comply with the requirements of this subchapter through the issuance of rules or otherwise. Subsequent statute may not be held to supersede or modify this subchapter, chapter 7, sections 1305, 3105, 3344, 4301(2)(E), 5372, or 7521 of this title, or the provisions of section 5335(a)(B) of this title that relate to administrative law judges, except to the extent that it does so expressly.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 388; Pub. L. 90–623, §1(1), Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1312; Pub. L. 95–251, §2(a)(1), Mar. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 183; Pub. L. 95–454, title VIII, §801(a)(3)(B)(iii), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1221.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 1011. | June 11, 1946, ch. 324, §12, 60 Stat. 244. |

Statutes at Large

In the first and last sentences, the words "This subchapter, chapter 7, and sections 1305, 3105, 3344, 4301(2)(E), 5362, and 7521, and the provisions of section 5335(a)(B) of this title that relate to hearing examiners" are substituted for "this Act" to reflect the codification of the Act in this title. The words "to diminish the constitutional rights of any person or" are omitted as surplusage as there is nothing in the Act that can reasonably be construed to diminish those rights and because a statute may not operate in derogation of the Constitution.

The third sentence of former section 1011 is omitted as covered by technical section 7. The sixth sentence of former section 1011 is omitted as executed.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–454 substituted "5372" for "5362" wherever appearing.

Pub. L. 95–251 substituted "administrative law judges" for "hearing examiners" wherever appearing.

1968—Pub. L. 90–623 inserted "of this title" after "7521" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–454 effective on first day of first applicable pay period beginning on or after the 90th day after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 801(a)(4) of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5361 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–623 intended to restate without substantive change the law in effect on Oct. 22, 1968, see section 6 of Pub. L. 90–623, set out as a note under section 5334 of this title.
### §1525. Termination

#### (a) In general

The authority provided under section 663 of this title, and the reporting requirements under section 1524(c) of this title shall terminate on September 30, 2024.

#### (b) Rule of construction

Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed to affect the limitation of liability of a private entity for assistance provided to the Secretary under section 663(d)(2) 1 of this title, if such assistance was rendered before the termination date under subsection (a) or otherwise during a period in which the assistance was authorized.

(Pub. L. 114–113, div. N, title II, §227, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2971; Pub. L. 115–278, §2(h)(1)(G), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4182; Pub. L. 117–328, div. O, title I, §101, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5226; Pub. L. 118–47, div. G, title I, §106, Mar. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 857.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2024—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 118–47 substituted "September 30, 2024" for "September 30, 2023".

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–328 substituted "September 30, 2023" for "the date that is 7 years after December 18, 2015".

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–278, §2(h)(1)(G)(i), substituted "section 663 of this title" for "section 151 of this title, as added by section 223(a)(6) of this division,".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–278, §2(h)(1)(G)(ii), substituted "section 663(d)(2) of this title" for "section 151(d)(2) of this title, as added by section 223(a)(6) of this division,".

1 So in original. Probably should be "663(c)(2)".
### SUBCHAPTER II—TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Opportunities to Strengthen Controls to Avoid Undue External Influence Over Capital Purchase Program Decision-Making

              																	United States. Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program. 						*Opportunities to Strengthen Controls to Avoid Undue External Influence Over Capital Purchase Program Decision-Making, SIGTARP-09-002*,												Washington: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										August 6, 2009,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5099,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 11.1

CYANOTECH CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
Fiscal years ended March 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999

`2001                2000                 1999
                                                        ----------------    ----------------    ----------------
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
Net loss                                                $    (1,067,000)    $    (4,485,000)    $    (2,557,000)
Undeclared Preferred Stock dividends                                 --            (237,000)           (238,000)
                                                        ----------------    ----------------    ----------------
Net loss attributable to Common stockholders            $    (1,067,000)    $    (4,722,000)    $    (2,795,000)
                                                        ================    ================    ================

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding                   15,997,000          13,775,000          13,602,000
                                                        ================    ================    ================

Net loss per Common Share                               $         (0.07)    $         (0.34)    $         (0.21)
                                                        ================    ================    ================`

For the years ended March
31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, warrants and options to purchase Common Stock shares of
the Company and convertible preferred stock were outstanding, but were not
included in the 2001, 2000 and 1999 computation of diluted net loss per common
share because the inclusion of these securities would have had an antidilutive
effect on the net loss per common share. During the year ended March 31, 2001,
convertible debentures were outstanding, but were not included in the
computation of diluted net loss per common share because the inclusion of these
instruments would have had an antidilutive effect on the net loss per common
share.
EGU MACT -- Additional comments on the EGU MACT Preamble

12/15/2011 10:18 AM

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Hi Bob, Below are additional interagency comments on the EGU MACT rule. The page numbers are in reference to the clean version we received on Monday.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney

Page 34, footnote 13: Suggest deleting footnote. The first sentence of the footnote has broader implications beyond this rule, and is not necessary to support the rule. The second and third sentences repeat information in the body of the rule, and are unnecessary.

Page 233, carry-over paragraph, last sentence: This sentence includes the statement that, “EPA’s finding of a hazard to public health . . . is based on the results for the female subsistence fishing population . . . .” This statement does not appear to be consistent with other, more general statements in the preamble regarding the basis for EPA’s decision. See, e.g., section III.G, beginning on page 302. Suggest revising the sentence as appropriate.

In Section XIII.J, beginning on page 693 (EO 12898/Environmental Justice), in several locations, the phrases “minority, low income, or indigenous” and “minority, low income, and tribal” are used in contexts in which the expression “minority or low income” (based on the EO) would appear to be appropriate.

Page 698, last paragraph: Should the statements in this paragraph be qualified (e.g., “potential to cause”; “potential for elevated levels of Hg deposition”)?

Was the proximity-to-the-source review based on “coal-fired EGUs” (page 700, last sentence) or “affected sources” (page 700, Table 12, title)?

Page 700, Table 12: Suggest adding a table note providing the definition used for “minority”.

Page 706, Section XIII.J.5, paragraph 1, sentence 2: In this context, it appears that “vulnerable” should be “minority and low income”.
### §4521. Definition

For the purpose of this subchapter, the term "law enforcement officer" means—

(1) a law enforcement officer within the meaning of section 5541(3) and to whom the provisions of chapter 51 apply;

(2) a member of the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division;

(3) a member of the United States Park Police;

(4) a special agent in the Diplomatic Security Service;

(5) a probation officer (referred to in section 3672 of title 18); and

(6) a pretrial services officer (referred to in section 3153 of title 18).

(Added Pub. L. 101–509, title V, §529 [title IV, §408(a)], Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1427, 1467; amended Pub. L. 102–141, title VI, §627, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 874; Pub. L. 102–378, §2(21), Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1348.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–378 amended section generally, substituting in par. (1) "section 5541(3)" for "section 8331(20) or section 8401(17)".

1991—Pub. L. 102–141 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "For the purpose of this subchapter, the term 'law enforcement officer' has the same meaning as under section 5949(a)."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 101–509, title V, §529 [title IV, §408(d)], Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1427, 1468, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this subchapter and amending provisions set out as a note under section 5541 of this title] shall be effective on January 1, 1992."

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of the functions, personnel, assets, and obligations of the United States Secret Service, including the functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 381, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.