alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 22

- 00592

- CV

IN RE Jonathan RIVAS

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 2, 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On September 15, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering

the petition and this record, this c ourt concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CVA000440D1, styled Roel Sauceda v. Jonathan Rivas , pending in

the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Joe Lopez presiding

.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 24

- 00229

- CV

In re Jacqueline Morales

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied , and the emergency motion to stay is

dismissed as moot

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a)

.

_______________________ ___________________

Darlene Byrne

, Chief Justice

Before Chief Just ice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Filed: April 12, 2024
#### § 219.113 Suspension or Termination of IRB Approval of Research.

An IRB shall have authority to suspend or terminate approval of research that is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects. Any suspension or termination of approval shall include a statement of the reasons for the IRB's action and shall be reported promptly to the investigator, appropriate institutional officials, and the department or agency head.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
§ 232.2 Applicability; examples. ( a ) ( 1 ) *Applicability.* This part applies to consumer credit extended by a creditor to a covered borrower, as those terms are defined in this part. Nothing in this part applies to a credit transaction or account relating to a consumer who is not a covered borrower at the time he or she becomes obligated on a credit transaction or establishes an account for credit. Nothing in this part applies to a credit transaction or account relating to a consumer (which otherwise would be consumer credit) when the consumer no longer is a covered borrower.
( 2 ) *Examples* — ( i ) *Covered borrower.* Consumer A is a member of the armed forces but not serving on active duty, and holds an account for closed-end credit with a financial institution. After establishing the closed-end credit account, Consumer A is ordered to serve on active duty, thereby becoming a covered borrower, and soon thereafter separately establishes an open-end line of credit for personal purposes (which is not subject to any exception or temporary exemption) with the financial institution. This part applies to the open-end line of credit, but not to the closed-end credit account.
( ii ) *Not a covered borrower.* Same facts as described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section. One year after establishing the open-end line of credit, Consumer A ceases to serve on active duty. This part never did apply to the closed-end credit account, and because Consumer A no longer is a covered borrower, this part no longer applies to the open-end line of credit.
( b ) *Examples.* The examples in this part are not exclusive. To the extent that an example in this part implicates a term or provision of Regulation Z (12 CFR part 1026), issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to implement the Truth in Lending Act, Regulation Z shall control the meaning of that term or provision.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex*rel. Walter McMillian, Appellant, v. Milton Klein, as Warden of Bronx House of Detention, Respondent.

Order entered on March 15, 1962 unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### Harry Sklar, appellee, v. Hydrox Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,175.

Action to recover damage to plaintiff’s automobile sustained in collision with defendant’s truck. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph S. La Buy, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Gallagher, Kohlsaat, Rinaker & Wilkinson, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice O ’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 191.7 Civilian EEO program staff. ( a ) EEO Managers, including SEP Managers and other staff who are responsible for EEO and affirmative action programs, shall function at a level that is sufficiently responsible with the assigned organization to enable them to communicate effectively the goals and objectives of the program and to enable them to obtain the understanding, support, and commitment of managers and other officials at all levels within the organization.
( b ) It shall be the responsibility of EEO Managers, SEP Managers, and other program staff to develop, coordinate, implement, and recommend to managers, other officials, and covered groups the policy, guidance, information, and activities necessary to attain the goals of the SEPs and the overall DoD Civilian EEO Program.
#### § 1662.5 Who can file a FOIA request?

Any member of the public may submit a FOIA request to SSS. Under the FOIA, “member of the public” includes requests from individuals, corporations, state, and local agencies, as well as foreign entities. Requests from Federal agencies and Federal or state courts are not covered by the FOIA.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1365 

Calling for the termination of United States Secret Service Director Kimberly 

Cheatle from her position, effective immediately. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2024 

Mr. LANGWORTHY (for himself, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. VAN DREW, Ms. MACE, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, 

Mr. DONALDS, Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. FRY, Mr. 

WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. GALLEGO, Mrs. BICE, Mr. BUCHANAN, Ms. 

TENNEY, Mr. FALLON, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. 

LAWLER, Mr. TURNER, Mr. MOLINARO, Mr. BALDERSON, Mrs. 

HOUCHIN, Mrs. KIGGANS of Virginia, and Mrs. MCCLAIN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Calling for the termination of United States Secret Service 

Director Kimberly Cheatle from her position, effective 

immediately. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls for 

2 the termination of United States Secret Service Director 

3 Kimberly Cheatle from her position, effective immediately. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### §321e. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–387, §2(c)(1), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5166

Section, Pub. L. 107–296, title V, §516, as added Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §611(13), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1409; amended Pub. L. 112–166, §2(f)(4), Aug. 10, 2012, 126 Stat. 1285, related to establishment, qualifications, and responsibilities of Chief Medical Officer. See section 597 of this title.
(May 13, 1963)

#### George S. Blair, Appellant, v. R. C. Motor Lines, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 19, 1962, which denied his renewed application for a preference in trial pursuant to article III of the Special Rule of this court regulating the granting of preferences in the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department. Order reversed, without costs; renewed application for a preference in trial pursuant to article III of said rule granted; and matter remitted to the Special Term for entry of an appropriate order under said article III. In view of the extent of the claimed special damages and of the fact that such claim is uneontroverted, it is our opinion that the jurisdictional monetary limitation of the Civil Court of the City of New York may preclude adequate recovery by the plaintiff in that court; hence, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny this article III preference application. Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., taking no part.
### SUBCHAPTER II—EMPLOYEES OF NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITIES
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 251 (Thursday, December 31, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 86914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
    Docket Number: PR21-11-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: COH Rates effective 
Nov 25 2020 to be effective 11/25/2020 Filing Type: 980.
    Filed Date: 12/22/20.
    Accession Number: 202012225073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/12/2021.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-326-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Volume No. 2--SWN Energy 
Services Company, LLC SP102504 to be effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20201222-5009.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-327-000.
    Applicants: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing--
January 1, 2021 SWEPCO 1006349 to be effective 1/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20201222-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 23, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-28970 Filed 12-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
§ 2402.2 Delegation of authority and responsibilities. ( a ) The Director of OSTP designates the OSTP General Counsel as the Chief FOIA Officer and hereby delegates to the Chief FOIA Officer the authority to act upon all requests for agency records and to re-delegate such authority at his or her discretion.
( b ) The Chief FOIA Officer shall designate a FOIA Public Liaison, who shall serve as the supervisory official to whom a FOIA requester can raise concerns about the service the FOIA requestor has received following an initial request. The FOIA Public Liaison will be listed on the OSTP website (*https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/foia*) and may re-delegate the FOIA Public Liaison's authority at his or her discretion.
( c ) The Director establishes a FOIA Requester Service Center that shall be staffed by the Chief FOIA Officer and the FOIA Public Liaison. The contact information for the FOIA Requester Service Center is: Address: Office of Science and Technology Policy, Eisenhower Executive Office Building, 1650 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20504; Telephone: (202) 456-4444; Fax: (202) 395-1224; Email: *ostpfoia@ostp.eop.gov .* Updates to this contact information will be made on the OSTP website.