alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1268 

Expressing support for the designation of the week of June 2 through June 

8, 2024, as ‘‘National Trailer Safety Week’’ in the United States, and 

supporting the goals and ideals of National Trailer Safety Week to 

educate American motorists about the importance of proper towing techniques and maintenance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2024 

Mr. YAKYM (for himself, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. BURCHETT, and Mr. BISHOP

of Georgia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of the week of June 

2 through June 8, 2024, as ‘‘National Trailer Safety 

Week’’ in the United States, and supporting the goals 

and ideals of National Trailer Safety Week to educate 

American motorists about the importance of proper towing techniques and maintenance. 

Whereas ‘‘National Trailer Safety Week’’ was launched to 

raise awareness about the need for increased education 

on trailer safety to further reduce injuries and fatalities 

on the road; 

Whereas educating end-users is crucial to utilize the connections that dealers and manufacturers have with conVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:42 Jun 04, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1268.IH HR1268

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1268 IH 

sumers in order to raise awareness of proper towing techniques and maintenance; 

Whereas national trailer growth remains high, with 980,000 

new light- and medium-duty trailers registered in 2023; 

and 

Whereas the National Association of Trailer Manufacturer’s 

Trailer Safety Week reaches hundreds of thousands of individuals each year, and is the first nationwide traffic 

safety initiative aimed at addressing safe towing practices 

for light- and medium-duty trailers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Trail3 er Safety Week’’; and 

4 (2) expresses strong support for— 

5 (A) the goals and ideals of National Trail6 er Safety Week; 

7 (B) efforts to increase awareness of the 

8 importance of being committed to trailer safety; 

9 (C) educating end-users about proper trail10 er maintenance and usage; 

11 (D) creating a stronger partnership and al12 liance between stakeholders of the industry, in13 cluding suppliers, trailer dealers, and manufac14 turers, and end-users; and 

15 (E) encouraging the people of the United 

16 States to participate in National Trailer Safety 

17 Week events and activities, and educate themVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:42 Jun 04, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1268.IH HR1268

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1268 IH 

1 selves and others on the importance of regularly 

2 inspecting, maintaining, and operating light3 and medium-duty trailers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 47691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19563]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7975]

In the Matter of the Designation of Azzam Abdullah Zureik Al-
Maulid Al-Subhi, Also Known as Azzam al-Subhi, Also Known as Mansur al-
Harbi, Also Known as Azam Abdullah Razeeq Al Mouled Alsbhua, Also Known 
as Abu Muslem al-Maky, Also Known as Abu Suliman al-Harbi, Also Known 
as Abu Abdalla al-Harbi, Also Known as Azam A.R. Alsbhua; as a 
Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended.

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Azzam Abdullah 
Zureik Al-Maulid Al-Subhi, also known as Azzam al-Subhi, also known as 
Mansur al-Harbi, also known as Azam Abdullah Razeeq Al Mouled Alsbhua, 
also known as Abu Muslem al-Maky, also known as Abu Suliman al-Harbi, 
also known as Abu Abdalla al-Harbi, also known as Azam A.R. Alsbhua, 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in Section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 18, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-19563 Filed 8-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
#### Gordon M. Shoolman, Appellant, v. Gannett Company Inc., Respondent.

Appeal dismissed unless records and briefs are filed and served on or before June 20,1960.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000766041
<NAME> CENTRAL SPRINKLER
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,884
<SECURITIES>                                    12,466
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,622
<INVENTORY>                                     43,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,137
<PP&E>                                          60,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,615
<BONDS>                                         24,674
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,918
<SALES>                                        187,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,220
<CGS>                                          134,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,060
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,297
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,763
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,763
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
        

</TABLE>
#### § 222.2 Applicability.

This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within DoD (hereafter referred to collectively as the “DoD Components”).
Exhibit 21.1


                          BEN & JERRY'S HOMEMADE, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


                                                                 Percentage of
                                           Jursidiction       Voting Stock Owned
Name of Subsidiary                       of Incorporation       by Registration
------------------                       ----------------       ---------------

Ben & Jerry's Canada (1992), Inc.             Canada                 100%

Ben & Jerry's Children's Center, Inc.         Vermont                100%

Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Ltd.              United Kingdom             100%

Ben & Jerry's Homemade (FSC), Inc.           Barbados                100%

Ben & Jerry's Homemade Holdings, Inc.         Vermont                100%

Ben & Jerry's of New York                    New York                100%

Ben & Jerry's International, Inc.            Delaware                100%

<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a  14(a)/15d  14(a) Certification

of the Chief Executive Officer

I, James R. Bazet, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ James R. Bazet           
|                        |  | James R. Bazet               
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Rates in the California Airframe Industry, 1941

              																	Solomon, Louis M.					 and 	Tolles, N. Arnold. 						*Wage Rates in the California Airframe Industry, 1941 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 704*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1942,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4206,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### SUBCHAPTER XVIII—CYBERSECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY AGENCY
# C_2008223EN.01004001.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/40

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 26 June 2008 — Gibtelecom v Commission

(Joined Cases T-433/03, T-434/03, T-367/04 and T-244/05) (1)

1

(Competition - Telecommunications - Decisions not to take any further action on complaints based on Article 86 EC - Failure of the Commission to define a position on complaints based on Article 86 EC - Actions for annulment - Actions for failure to act - Action which becomes devoid of purpose in the course of proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 223/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gibtelecom Ltd (Gibraltar) (represented by: M. Llamas, barrister, and B. O'Connor, solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and A. Whelan, and subsequently by F. Castillo de la Torre, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Actions for (i) annulment of the alleged decisions of the Commission of 17 October 2003, 5 July 2004 and 26 April 2005 not to take any further action in respect of two complaints calling on the Commission to act, on the basis of Article 86(3) EC, to put an end to infringements of Community law allegedly committed by the Kingdom of Spain, and (ii) a declaration under Article 232 EC that, by failing to define a position on the further action which it proposed to take with respect to certain aspects of one of those complaints, the Commission failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the actions;

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the Kingdom of Spain's application to intervene in Case T-367/04; |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the Kingdom of Spain's application to intervene in Case T-367/04;

| 3. | Gibtelecom Ltd and the Commission shall each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Gibtelecom Ltd and the Commission shall each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 6.3.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Discovery Oil, Ltd, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew V. Ippolito, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Andrew V. Ippolito By  __________________________________ Andrew V. Ippolito President, Chairman of the Board Date:  November 14, 2007
Unassociated Document


     

     

    Exhibit
      10v-1

    


    SCHEDULE
      OF INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS FOR EXECUTIVES

    


    In
      accordance with the Instructions to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant
      has omitted filing the Indemnification Agreement for Executives by and between
      Rogers Corporation and the following employees as exhibits to this Form 10-K
      because they are identical to the Form of Indemnification Agreement for
      Executives (the “Form Agreement”) by and between Rogers Corporation and certain
      employees, which was filed on Form 8-K on December 14, 2004.

    


    
      	 	
              1.

            	
              Michael
                D. Bessette

            


    

    
      	 	
              2.

            	
              Michael
                L. Cooper

            


    

    
      	 	
              3.

            	
              Robert
                C. Daigle

            


    

    
      	 	
              4.

            	
              Frank
                J. Gillern

            


    

    
      	 	
              5.

            	
              Debra
                J. Granger

            


    

    
      	 	
              6.

            	
              Peter
                G. Kaczmarek

            


    

    
      	 	
              7.

            	
              Mario
                C. Kerr

            


    

    
      	 	
              8.

            	
              Richard
                F. Marani

            


    

    
      	 	
              9.

            	
              Ty
                L. McFarland

            


    

    
      	 	
              10.

            	
              Paul
                B. Middleton

            


    

    
      	 	
              11.

            	
              John
                A. Richie

            


    

    
      	 	
              12.

            	
              W.
                David Smith

            


    

    
      	 	
              13.

            	
              Robert
                M. Soffer

            


    

    
      	 	
              14.

            	
              Luc
                Van Eenaeme

            


    

    
      	 	
              15.

            	
              Robert
                D. Wachob

            


    

    
      	 	
              16.

            	
              Dennis
                M. Loughran
### §9806. Term appointments

(a) The Administrator may authorize term appointments within the Administration under subchapter I of chapter 33, for a period of not less than 1 year and not more than 6 years.

(b) Notwithstanding chapter 33 or any other provision of law relating to the examination, certification, and appointment of individuals in the competitive service, the Administrator may convert an employee serving under a term appointment to a permanent appointment in the competitive service within the Administration without further competition if—

(1) such individual was appointed under open, competitive examination under subchapter I of chapter 33 to the term position;

(2) the announcement for the term appointment from which the conversion is made stated that there was potential for subsequent conversion to a career-conditional or career appointment;

(3) the employee has completed at least 2 years of current continuous service under a term appointment in the competitive service;

(4) the employee's performance under such term appointment was at least fully successful or equivalent; and

(5) the position to which such employee is being converted under this section is in the same occupational series, is in the same geographic location, and provides no greater promotion potential than the term position for which the competitive examination was conducted.

(c) Notwithstanding chapter 33 or any other provision of law relating to the examination, certification, and appointment of individuals in the competitive service, the Administrator may convert an employee serving under a term appointment to a permanent appointment in the competitive service within the Administration through internal competitive promotion procedures if the conditions under paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (b) are met.

(d) An employee converted under this section becomes a career-conditional employee, unless the employee has otherwise completed the service requirements for career tenure.

(e) An employee converted to career or career-conditional employment under this section acquires competitive status upon conversion.

(Added Pub. L. 108–201, §3(a), Feb. 24, 2004, 118 Stat. 466.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH LAMAR FOSTER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 194 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27 th day of December, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED . The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether, under the applicable totality of the circumstances test, the detective’s representation to petitioner that he was not a suspect rendered petitioner’s subsequent statement involuntary?
#### Samuel Chase, as Administrator of the Estate of Anna Chase, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

Order, dated December 11, 1957, granting plaintiffs’ motion, pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.