alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[115th Congress Public Law 134]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 340]]

Public Law 115-134
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 324 West Saint Louis Street in Pacific, Missouri, as the ``Specialist 
  Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post Office''. <<NOTE: Mar. 16, 2018 -  [H.R. 
                                 452]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SPECIALIST JEFFREY L. WHITE, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 324 West Saint Louis Street in Pacific, Missouri, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Specialist Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post Office''.

    Approved March 16, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 452:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 163 (2017):
                                    Oct. 10, 11, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 164 (2018):
                                    Mar. 7, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Hickory Tech Corporation (HickoryTech) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Duffy, Chief Executive Officer ofHickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.

 

 
| /s/ John E.  Duffy       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| John E.  Duffy           |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| February 27,  2004       |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Cyanotech Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 33-63789, 333-42484, 333-141911, and 333-141912 on
Form S-8 and 333-42486, 333-97755, and 333-101401 on Form S-3 of Cyanotech Corporation of our reports dated June 26,
2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cyanotech Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2008, and the related financial statement
schedule, which reports appear in the March 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Cyanotech Corporation.

Honolulu,
Hawaii
June 26, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 23, 2020.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 11, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 2 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-45, CP2021-46.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2020-28447 Filed 12-22-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
§ 251.5 Responsibilities. ( a ) The USD(P&R): ( 1 ) Provides overall policy guidance for carrying out the responsibilities and duties of the Secretary of Defense in accordance with DoD Directive 5124.02 and 50 U.S.C. 1913.
( 2 ) Ensures appropriate resources are programmed for the administration and operation of the NLSC.
( b ) Under the authority, direction, and control of the USD(P&R), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness (ASD(R)): ( 1 ) Through the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Force Education: ( i ) Develops processes and polices regarding the NLSC oversight and coordination by the NSEB in accordance with 50 U.S.C. 1903 and 1913.
( ii ) Recommends and oversees the establishment and execution of policies, programs, and goals to ensure the NLSC supports the readiness of the Military Services.
( iii ) Oversees, and monitors compliance with the NLSC programs and processes on behalf of the Secretary of Defense to include the procedures in § 251.6.
( iv ) Ensures that functions needed to support the accomplishment of the NLSC mission are executed, including engagement with DoD Components, federal agencies, and State and local governments to identify language needs, assessment of language proficiency of its members, and skill sustainment training.
( v ) Determines eligibility for NLSC membership.
( 2 ) Hosts the annual program review identified in 50 U.S.C. 1913.
( 3 ) Designates a program manager responsible for overseeing implementation of NLSC programs and processes.
( c ) Under the authority, direction, and control of the USD(P&R), the Director, Department of Defense Human Resources Activity (DoDHRA): ( 1 ) Implements procedures and instructions for the appointment of NLSC members in support of DoD or other U.S. departments or agencies.
( 2 ) Authorizes and signs interagency agreements between the NLSC and organizations outside of the DoD, and delegates authority to sign such agreements as needed.
( 3 ) Provides administrative support to the NLSC, including actions related to intra- and inter-agency agreements, the intra- and inter-agency transfer of funds, personnel actions, and travel requirements.
( 4 ) Provides fiscal management and oversight to ensure all funds provided for the NLSC are separately and visibly accounted for in the DoD budget.
( d ) DoD Components heads ensure that the use of NLSC members is considered during exercise and operational planning.
# C_2008301EN.01006002.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/60

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italian Republic v Commission

(Case T-207/04) (1)

1

(2008/C 301/100)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 7.8.2004.

1

---
# C_2011063EN.01001803.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/18

---

Application for interpretation of judgment of 17 May 1990, Barber (C-262/88), lodged on 26 May 2010 by Manuel Enrique Peinado Guitart

(Case C-262/88 INT)

2011/C 63/35

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Manuel Enrique Peinado Guitart

Applicant:

By order of 17 December 2010, the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) declared the application for interpretation inadmissible.

---
FORE REEF GROUPER UTILIZE DEEP REEF OUTSIDE RESERVE

Research Project Description: Grouper are an important recreational and commercial fish species. Scientists tracked 

several species of grouper (red, Nassau, black, gag, goliath and rock hind) using acoustic tags to determine their habitat 

use within Western Sambo Ecological Reserve (WSER). WSER, a nine square nautical mile no-take reserve established 

in 1997, protects a range of habitats that help sustain both juvenile and adult grouper, including shallow grass beds, hardbottom, patch reefs, and spur and groove reefs in deeper waters. 

Research Results: Tracking studies showed that grouper captured on patch reefs remained on patch reefs and were 

protected for the most part within WSER. In contrast, grouper captured in the fore reef zone or deeper outlier reef (outside 

the reserve) showed substantial movement between reefs within WSER and those deeper reefs. WSER is effective in 

providing protection for patch reef habitat groupers, but is inadequate in protecting grouper using the fore reef zone and 

outlier reef, as these fish often crossed the reserve boundary. A related study for WSER spiny lobsters shows that this same 

outlier reef is visited by female lobsters releasing their eggs into the currents, confirming the importance of these deeper, 

low profile outlier reefs to fish and lobster reproduction. 

Tracking of red grouper shows movement between reefs within Western Sambo Ecological 

Reserve and those reefs outside the reserve. The thicker red lines indicate pathways most 

often utilized and the thin lines represent paths traveled less frequently by this fish. 

Figure: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

Reference: M.W. Feeley, et al., Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 

Finfish Movement Patterns and Habitat Use within a Marine Protected Area in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary.

Linking Science to Management: A Conference and Workshop on the Florida Keys Marine Ecosystem. 2010.

June 2012 floridakeys.noaa.gov
### §352. Annual employee award program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may establish an annual employee award program to recognize Department employees or groups of employees for significant contributions to the achievement of the Department's goals and missions. If such a program is established, the Secretary shall—

(1) establish within such program categories of awards, each with specific criteria, that emphasize honoring employees who are at the nonsupervisory level;

(2) publicize within the Department how any employee or group of employees may be nominated for an award;

(3) establish an internal review board comprised of representatives from Department components, headquarters, and field personnel to submit to the Secretary award recommendations regarding specific employees or groups of employees;

(4) select recipients from the pool of nominees submitted by the internal review board under paragraph (3) and convene a ceremony at which employees or groups of employees receive such awards from the Secretary; and

(5) publicize such program within the Department.

#### (b) Internal review board

The internal review board described in subsection (a)(3) shall, when carrying out its function under such subsection, consult with representatives from operational components and headquarters, including supervisory and nonsupervisory personnel, and employee labor organizations that represent Department employees.

#### (c) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section may be construed to authorize additional funds to carry out the requirements of this section or to require the Secretary to provide monetary bonuses to recipients of an award under this section.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VII, §712, as added Pub. L. 117–81, div. F, title LXIV, §6402(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2398.)
### SUBCHAPTER II—FEDERAL EVIDENCE-BUILDING ACTIVITIES
ASSIGNMENT
      AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE

     

    THIS
      ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE, made as of this 1st
      day of
      March, 2006 by and between StarInvest Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation
      (“Assignor”) and GoIP Global, Inc., a Nevada corporation
      (“Assignee”).

     

    W
      I T
      N E S S E T H:

     

    Assignor
      is Tenant under a lease with 122 East 42nd
      Corp.
      dated January 2005 (the “Lease”) relating to Suite 2715 at 122 East
      42nd
      Street,
      New York, NY.

     

    Assignor
      desires to assign to Assignee, and Assignee desires to accept the assignment
      from Assignor of all Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the
      Lease.

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained
      herein, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, covenant
      and
      agree as follows:

     

    1. Assignor
      hereby transfers, assigns and sets over unto Assignee all of Assignor’s right,
      title and interest in and to the Lease.

     

    2. Assignee
      hereby accepts the foregoing assignment and assumes all of Assignor’s
      obligations as Tenant under the Lease accruing on or after the date
      hereof.

     

    3. The
      provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
      of
      the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

     

    4. This
      Agreement may be executed by facsimile and by any number of counterparts, each
      of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall
      be
      deemed to be one and the same instrument.

     

    5.
       Each
      party hereto shall cooperate and take such other actions, and execute such
      other
      documents as may be reasonably requested by the other party in order to carry
      out the provisions and purposes of this Agreement.

     

    6. This
      Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the
      State of New York.

     

    


     

    [Remainder
      of Page Intentionally Omitted; Signature Pages to Follow]

     

    


    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly
      executed the day and year first above written.

     

    ASSIGNOR:

     

    STARINVEST
      GROUP, INC.

    


    


    


    By:                                                
                    

    Name:

    Title:

     

    ASSIGNEE:

     

    GOIP
      GLOBAL, INC.

     

    By:                                                                

    Name:
      

    Title:
      

     

    ACKNOWLEDGED
      AND AGREED:

     

    LANDLORD

     

    By:
                               

    Name:
      

    Title:
§ 1656.20 Expenses for emergency medical care. ( a ) Claims for payment of actual and reasonable expenses for emergency medical care, including hospitalization, of ASWs who suffer illness or injury, and the transportation and burial of the remains of ASWs who suffer death as a direct result of such illness or injury will be paid in accordance with the provisions of this section.
( b ) The term “emergency medical care, including hospitalization”, as used in this section, means such medical care or hospitalization that normally must be rendered promptly after occurrence of the illness or injury necessitating such treatment. Discharge by a physician or facility subsequent to such medical care or hospitalization shall terminate the period of emergency.
( c ) Claims will be considered only for expenses: ( 1 ) For which only the ASW is liable and for which there is no legal liability for his reimbursement except in accord with the provisions of this section; and
( 2 ) That are incurred as a result of illness or injury that occurs while the ASW is acting in accord with orders of Selective Service to engage in travel or perform work for his Alternative Service employer.
( d ) No claim shall be allowed in any case in which the Director determines that the injury, illness, or death occurred because of the negligence or misconduct of the ASW.
( e ) No claim shall be paid unless it is presented to the Director within one year after the date on which the expense was incurred.
( f ) Cost of emergency medical care including hospitalization greater than usual and customary fees for service established by the Social Security Administration, will *prima facie* be considered unreasonable. Payment for burial expenses shall not exceed the maximum that the Administrator of Veteran's Affairs may pay under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 902(a) in any one case.
( g ) Payment of claims when allowed shall be made only directly to the ASW or his estate unless written authorization of the ASW or the personal representative of his estate has been received to pay another person.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of CyberOptics Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
G. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                                    /s/ Scott G. Larson
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Scott G. Larson
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    March 21, 2003





                                  END OF FILING
Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JEB EUGENE MARQUIS 

Defendant and Appellant. 

GRANT 

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until August 14, 2023, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's opening brief.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOrion Ground Test Article Water Impact Tests: Photogrammetric Evaluation of Impact ConditionsThe Ground Test Article (GTA) is an early production version of the Orion Crew Module (CM). The structural design of the Orion CM is being developed based on LS-DYNA water landing simulations. As part of the process of confirming the accuracy of LS-DYNA water landing simulations, the GTA water impact test series was conducted at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) to gather data for comparison with simulations. The simulation of the GTA water impact tests requires the accurate determination of the impact conditions. To accomplish this, the GTA was outfitted with an array of photogrammetry targets. The photogrammetry system utilizes images from two cameras with a specialized tracking software to determine time histories for the 3-D coordinates of each target. The impact conditions can then be determined from the target location data.Document ID20180001984Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsVassilakos, Gregory J.*(Science and Technology Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Mark, Stephen D.*(Northrop Grumman Corp. Falls Church, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 20, 2018Publication DateJanuary 1, 2018Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberSTC-TR-3590NASA/CR-2018-219801NF1676L-28873Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 747797.06.13.06.32.04.02CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL12AA09CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180001984.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[4156]

#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Clara L. Bonesteel, Deceased. Ann E. Stowell, Appellant; Union National Bank of Troy et al., Respondents. In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Clara L. Bonesteel, Deceased. Barbara Mulvey, Appellant; Union National Bank of Troy et al., Respondents.

[4119]

Motions for reargument of the appeals and modification of the decisions. The decision in the Stowell case reversing the order admitting the will to probate affected the rights only of the appellant Stowell and did not operate to open the default of appellant Mulvey in appeal No. 4119. The dismissal of the Mulvey appeal as moot left the order of the Surrogate made on the Mulvey application unchanged; but the vacation of the order of probate on the Stowell application would change in essential respects the situation in respect of the probate proceedings at the time the Mulvey application was made; and we would assume that upon a renewal of the Mulvey application the Surrogate would view it in the light of the probate proceeding in which the order of probate has been vacated as to one interested party. Motions for reargument and modification of the decisions in appeals Nos. 4156 (Stowell) and 4119 (Mulvey) denied, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
§ 1804.1 Authority and purpose. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued under the authority of and in order to implement § 4.5 of Executive Order 12958 (or successor Orders); and Presidential Decision Directive/NSC 24, U.S. Counterintelligence Effectiveness, dated May 3, 1994.
( b ) *Purpose.* ( 1 ) This part prescribes procedures for: ( i ) Requesting access to NACIC records for purposes of historical research, or
( ii ) Requesting access to NACIC records as a former Presidential appointee.
( 2 ) Section 4.5 of Executive Order 12958 and this part do not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, officers, or employees.