alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
  
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Enodis plc (the “Company”) dated December 12, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew J. Allner, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
  
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
  
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
  
 
	 
	 /s/    ANDREW J. ALLNER
 

	 Andrew J. Allner
 Chief Executive Officer
 

 
 December 12, 2002 
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
  
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Enodis plc (the “Company”) dated December 12, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, W. David Wrench, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
  
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
  
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. 
  
 
	 
	 /s/    W. DAVID WRENCH 
 

	 W. David Wrench
 Chief Financial Officer
 

 
 December 12, 2002
§ 203.9 Submission of application. The applicant must submit a TAPP application to begin the TAPP procurement process. The application form is included as appendix A of this part and can be obtained from the DoD installation, the DoD Component headquarters, or directly from the Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Environmental Security, 3400 Defense Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 20301-3400. The applications will not be considered complete until the following data elements have been entered into the form: ( a ) Installation.
( b ) Source of TAPP request (names of RAB or TRC).
( c ) Certification of majority request.
( d ) RAB/TRC contact point for TAPP project.
( e ) Project title.
( f ) Project type (e.g. data interpretation, training, etc.).
( g ) Project purpose and description (descriptions, time and locations of products or services desired).
( h ) Statement of eligibility of project.
( i ) Proposed provider, if known.
( j ) Specific qualifications or criteria for provider.
§ 2400.16 Derivative classification markings. ( a ) Documents classified derivatively on the basis of source documents or classification guides shall bear all markings prescribed in § 2400.12 of this part and Directive No. 1 as are applicable. Information for these markings shall be taken from the source document or instructions in the appropriate classification guide. When markings are omitted because they may reveal a confidential source or relationship not otherwise evident, as described in § 2400.12 of this part, the information may not be used as a basis for derivative classification.
( b ) The authority for classification shall be shown as directed in Directive No. 1.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/Aof Lancer Corporation, as filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher D. Hughes, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| April 22, 2005 | /s/ CHRISTOPHER  D. HUGHES |   |
|----------------|----------------------------|--------|
|           | Christopher D.  Hughes,    |
|           | Chief Executive  Officer   |

 

----
National Archives and Records Administration

Office afthe Federal Register

Dec.mber 13,20)0

,

Ms. Nancy Moli.~or

Regulations Division (AGe-200)

Office of the Chief Counsel

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Dear Ms. Molitor:

The materiai listed in the attachment is approved for incorporation by reference in 14 CFR Pa.--t39.

This approval is contingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were

agreed upon by our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) is effective

on tbe effective date OfyOUT final rule. If you wish to enforce some other edition of the

publication(s) approved, you must:

1. Publish notice of the change in the Federal Register, and amend the

Code of Federal Regulations; and

2. Ensure that a copy afthat edition is on file at the Office of the Federal Register; and

3. Notify me in writing of the change.

rely, ~

~YM NDA.MOSLEY

Director of the Federal Register

FederalRegiste~~ttorneyMe

Attaclunent ; j ,-, '.' .'

US- mail address: 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park. MD 20740-6001

Office location: 800 North CapifDl Sl:I'fft,l\l'V", Suite 700, Washington. DC 200.12--4244

Federal Register web sites: http://\\:,,''V_~v'i'S_g9v/,f~9era1-regisler and http://www.gpoaccess.gov/naIa

. -.- -- '. " .. ," .
Incorporation by Reference

Docket No. FAA-2007-27042; Directorate Idcmlijier 2006-NJvf-225-AD; Amendment 39-16531; AD 2010-24-12

Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Alert Service Bulletin

777-57A0051

Alert Service Bulletil1 Revision 1

777-57 A0057

Alert Service Bulletin

777·57A0059

Service Bulletin 777- Revision 2

57A0050,

05/15/2006

08/02/2007

10/30/2008

05/1412009

Docket No. FAA-2008-1098; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-108-AD; Amendment 39-16532; AD 2010-24-13

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Service Bulletin 747· Revision 1

28A228B

01/2'1!2010

Docket No, FAA-2009-0430; Directorate Identijier 2008-NA1-148-AD; Amendment 39-16540; AD 2010-26-01

Boeing .commercial Airplanes Alert Service Bulletin Revision 2

777-78A0066

04108/2010

[Jacket No. FAA-20lO-0596; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-22-AD; Amendment 39~16533; AD 2010~24-14

Pratt & Whrtney

Pratt & Whitney

Service Bulletin No.

PW4ENG 72-799

Service Bulletin No.

PW4G-100-72-226

Revision 1 10/1412010

04f22/2010

Docket No. FAA-20lO-l02l; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-053-AD; Amendment 39·16541; AD 2010-26-02

Pacinc Aerospace Ltd. Mandatory Service Issue 1

Bulletin· PACSBIFU/094

08114/2008

Docket No. FAA-20l0-1242; Direcforate Identifier 2010-CE-062-AD; Amendl/1el.lt 39-16542; AD 2010-26-03

Hawker Beechcraft

Prillted 12/13/2010

Mandatory Service

Bulietin SB 30-3889

Revision 1 10/2010

Page 10fl
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Consumers' Cooperation in the United States in 1941

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Division of Industrial Relations. 						*Consumers' Cooperation in the United States in 1941 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 725*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1943,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4220,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 21.305 What is the purpose of the DoDGARs?

The DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations provide uniform policies and procedures for the award and administration of DoD Components' awards. The DoDGARs are the primary DoD regulations for achieving the DGARS purposes described in § 21.210.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       7,063,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,537,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 18,728,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,137,466
<PP&E>                                       8,030,387
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,661,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,189,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,461,638
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,968
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,922,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,189,381
<SALES>                                     61,679,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            61,679,499
<CGS>                                       43,030,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,521,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,842,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             6,714,361
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,447,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,317,408)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,317,408)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,317,408)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.51)
        

</TABLE>
#### POWELL v. HARRISON et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 8, 1905.)

Action by Martin Powell against Everett Harrison and others.

PER CURIAM.

Motion granted staying all proceedings in Surrogate’s Court until the determination of the appeal now pending in the Court of Appeals, on condition that the printed papers on the appeal now pending be filed in the Court of Appeals on or before March 20th.
### §21084. Minimum requirements

The requirements established by this subchapter are minimum requirements and nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to prevent a State from establishing election technology and administration requirements that are more strict than the requirements established under this subchapter so long as such State requirements are not inconsistent with the Federal requirements under this subchapter or any law described in section 21145 of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title III, §304, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1714.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 107–252, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1704, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15484 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 192.5 Responsibilities. The *Secretaries of the Military Departments* shall: ( a ) Ensure nondiscrimination in referring DoD personnel to off-base housing facilities.
( b ) Continue efforts (as described in DoD 4165.63-M[2] to identify and solicit nondiscriminatory assurances for housing facilities within the commuting area, which are considered to be suitable for occupancy by Service members.
( c ) Ensure that an office and staff required by DoD 4165.63-M are available in conjunction with the cognizant staff judge advocate or other legal authority to advise Service members on the following: ( 1 ) The procedures in this part.
( 2 ) The application of Public Law 90-284, 42 U.S.C. 1982, and Public Law 100-430 in specific situations.
( 3 ) The rights of individuals to pursue remedies through civilian channels, without recourse and in addition to the procedures prescribed in this part, including the right to: ( i ) Make a complaint directly to the Department of HUD and/or to the Department of Justice (DoJ) in the United States.
( ii ) Bring a private civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction.
( d ) Periodically review off-base housing procedures and policies to ensure effectiveness and compliance with this part. (Appendix A to this part is a checklist to help commanders with this review.)
( e ) Cooperate with other Government Agencies investigating housing discrimination complaints filed by Service members.
( f ) Ensure that each Military Service reports any housing discrimination cases and their results in the Annual Military Equal Opportunity Assessment Report required by DoD Instruction 1350.3.
[55 FR 6248, Feb. 22, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 56 FR 32964, July 18, 1991] Footnotes -
192.5
[2] See footnote 1 to § 192.4.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ ALESYA M. PASCHAL, Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent

______________________
2024

- 1689

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT

- 0752

- 16

- 0498

- I

- 1

.

______________________ O R D E R
The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52 (a) (1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is Case: 24-1689 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 06/03/2024P ASCHAL V

. D EFENSE 2

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

June 3, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 3, 2024 Case: 24-1689 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 06/03/2024
#### WATERS, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 27, 1905.)

Action by George B. Waters against the city of New York. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Maddox, J., at Special Term. 88 N. Y. Supp. 238.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WILBERT LEE HAWKINS,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-10-00029-CR

Appeal from

252nd District Court

of Jefferson County, Texas

(TC # 08-04659)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Wilbert Lee Hawkins appeals his conviction of evading arrest. We affirm.

Appellant entered a negotiated plea of guilty and the trial court placed him on deferred

adjudication community supervision for five years. The State subsequently filed a motion to

adjudicate guilt based on allegations Appellant had violated the terms and conditions of community

supervision. Appellant entered a plea of true to the allegation that he committed aggravated robbery

since being placed on community supervision. The trial court revoked Appellant’s community

supervision, adjudicated him guilty of evading arrest, and assessed his punishment at confinement

in the state jail for two years. 

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094,

18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why,

in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807
(Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State,

485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). 

A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his

right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and agree that the appeal is

wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably

support the appeal. The judgment is affirmed.

August 18, 2010 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
### §306121. Lease or exchange

(a) Authority To Lease or Exchange.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, each Federal agency, after consultation with the Council—

(1) shall, to the extent practicable, establish and implement alternatives (including adaptive use) for historic property that is not needed for current or projected agency purposes; and

(2) may lease historic property owned by the agency to any person or organization, or exchange any property owned by the agency with comparable historic property, if the agency head determines that the lease or exchange will adequately ensure the preservation of the historic property.

(b) Proceeds of Lease.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the proceeds of a lease under subsection (a) may be retained by the agency entering into the lease and used to defray the costs of administration, maintenance, repair, and related expenses incurred by the agency with respect to that property or other property that is on the National Register that is owned by, or are under the jurisdiction or control of, the agency. Any surplus proceeds from the leases shall be deposited in the Treasury at the end of the 2d fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the proceeds are received.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3228.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 306121(a) | 16 U.S.C. 470h–3(a). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §111(a), as added Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §207, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2997; Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4013, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4761. |
| 306121(b) | 16 U.S.C. 470h–3(b). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §111(b), as added Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §207, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2997. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Historic Lease Process Simplification

Pub. L. 105–391, title VIII, §802(b), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3523, provided that: "The Secretary is directed to simplify, to the maximum extent possible, the leasing process for historic properties with the goal of leasing available structures in a timely manner."

[For "Secretary" as used in section 802(b) of Pub. L. 105–391, set out above, as meaning the Secretary of the Interior, see section 2 of Pub. L. 105–391, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3498, which was classified to section 5901 of Title 16, Conservation, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–287.]
§ 2400.1 Authority. ( a ) Executive Order 12356 “National Security Information,” dated April 2, 1982, 47 FR 14874 (Apr. 6, 1982); 47 FR 15557 (Apr. 12, 1982) and Order of Designation of May 7, 1982, 47 FR 20105 (May 11, 1982).
( b ) Information Security Oversight Office, Directive No. 1, “National Security Information,” dated June 23, 1982, 47 FR 27836 (June 25, 1982) (Directive No. 1).
```

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a)
      AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

            Dated:   September 26, 2006                  /S/ANDREW R. PERZ
                   ----------------------            -------------------------
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
**Exhibit21.1**

 

**Lancer Corporation**

**List of Significant Subsidiaries**

 

 

 

 

**UnitedStates of America:**

Lancer Capital Corporation

Lancer International Sales, Inc.

Lancer Investment Corporation

Lancer Partnership, Ltd.

Lancer Frank Corporation

Lancer FBD Partnership, Ltd.

Lancer Ice Link, LLC

Advanced Beverage Solutions, LLC

Lauch Lancer LLC

 

**Mexico:**

Industrias Lancermex, S.A. de C.V.

Lancer de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

Servicios Lancermex, S.A. de C.V.

 

**Brazil:**

Lancer do Brasil, Industria e Comercio Ltda.

 

**Ecuador**

Ecualancer S.A.

 

**Europe:**

Lancer Europe, S.A.

OOO Lancer Sales Company

 

**Australia:**

Lancer Pacific, Pty. Ltd.

Lancer Pacific Industies, Pty. Ltd.

 

**NewZealand:**

Lancer Pacific, Ltd.

 

 

1

----