alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 210.3 Policy. ( a ) It is the policy of the Department of Defense that an effective, comprehensive traffic safety program be established and maintained at all military installations as prescribed in DoD Directive 6055.4.1
( b ) State vehicular and pedestrian traffic laws that are now or may hereafter be in effect shall be expressly adopted and made applicable on military installations to the extent provided by this part. All persons on a military installation shall comply with the vehicular and pedestrian traffic laws of the state in which the installation is located.
( c ) Pursuant to the authority established in the Enclosure 1 to DoD Directive 5525.4[2] , installation commanders of all DoD installations in the United States and over which the United States has exclusive or concurrent legislative jurisdiction are delegated the authority to establish additional vehicular and pedestrian traffic rules and regulations for their installations. All persons on a military installation shall comply with locally established vehicular and pedestrian traffic rules and regulations.
( d ) A person found guilty of violating, on a military installation, any state vehicular or pedestrian traffic law or local installation vehicular or pedestrian traffic rule or regulation made applicable to the installation under the provisions of this part is subject to a fine of not more than $50 or imprisonment for not more than 30 days, or both, for each violation (40 U.S.C. 318c).
( e ) A copy of this part shall be posted in an appropriate place on the DoD installation concerned.
[46 FR 58306, Dec. 1, 1981, as amended at 56 FR 13285, Apr. 1, 1991; 56 FR 42939, Aug. 30, 1991] Footnotes -
210.3
[2] See footnote 1 to § 210.1.
Exhibit
21.0

SUBSIDIARIES

|                                  |  |                           
|--------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Name                              |  | Jurisdiction
 of Formation
|                                  |  |                           
|CyberOptics Ltd.                  |  | United Kingdom            
|                                  |  |                           
|CyberOptics Holdings Ltd.         |  | United Kingdom            
|                                  |  |                           
|CyberOptics (Singapore)
 Pte. Ltd |  | Singapore                 
|                                  |  |                           
|CyberOptics Semiconductor,
 Inc.  |  | Minnesota                 
|                                  |  |                           
|CyberOptics (China) Co.,
 Ltd.    |  | Peoples Republic of China



---
§ 903.842 Federal inspections. ( a ) Part 842 of this chapter, *Federal Inspections,* applies to all coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) In addition to the requirements of part 842 of this chapter, OSM will furnish copies of inspection reports when requested by a designated Arizona State agency with jurisdiction over mining.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Crimilda Lugo, Respondent.

Appeals by the People (1) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 16, 1976, as, after a hearing, granted defendant’s motion to suppress certain physical evidence, and (2) from a further order of the same court, dated November 19, 1976, which dismissed the indictment. Order dated July 16, 1976 reversed insofar as appealed from, and order dated November 19, 1976 reversed, on the law and the facts, motion to suppress denied, and indictment reinstated. In our opinion, the police were entitled, two days after an armed robbery, to stop a car which fit the victim’s description, and to search its occupants, two of whom also fit the victim’s description. Given the fact that a gun was used in the robbery, the police could reasonably suspect the possibility of serious physical injury, thus warranting the detention of the occupants and an inquiry as to the crime. Given the information at their disposal, the police were equally justified in halting defendant as she reached into her handbag. Accordingly, the gun found therein was legally seized. Specific and articulable facts, taken together with rational inferences, reasonably warranted the intrusion (see *Terry v Ohio,*392 US 1, 21). Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Roy C. Schoenhaar et al., Respondents, v. Irving Air Chute Co. Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal by respondents from an order of Erie Special Term declaring action of board of directors of Irving Air Chute Co., Inc., postponing date of annual meeting void and of no effect; denying respondent’s demand for a jury trial; ordering respondent Halpern as secretary to call a meeting for May 16, 1962 and to give due and proper notice to stockholders.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
§ 1802.1 Authority and purpose. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued under the authority of and in order to implement § 1.9 of Executive Order (E.O.) 12958 and section 102 of the National Security Act of 1947.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part prescribes procedures for authorized holders of information classified under the various provisions of E.O. 12958, or predecessor Orders, to seek a review or otherwise challenge the classified status of information to further the interests of the United States Government. This part and § 1.9 of E.O. 12958 confer no rights upon members of the general public, or authorized holders acting in their personal capacity, both of whom shall continue to request reviews of classification under the mandatory declassification review provisions set forth at § 3.6 of E.O. 12958.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, H. R. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 15,
2004



/s/     H. R. BROWNH. R. BrownPresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 912.702 Exemption for coal extraction incidental to the extraction of other minerals.

Part 702 of this chapter, *Exemption for Coal Extraction Incidental to the Extraction of Other Minerals,* shall apply to any person who conducts coal extraction incidental to the extraction of other minerals for purposes of commercial use or sale.

[54 FR 52123, Dec. 20, 1989]
P.O Box 3350

Lihue, HI 96766

PH 808-651-0679/Fax 808-245-2029

We, Air Ventures Hawaii certificate# I96A349P and LOA # 

40JJWP13 would like to apply for a grant of exemption from Title 

14, Part 120, to permit us, operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover, with an equivalent level of safety, our 

safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing 

program.

We are currently covered for both our 135 and our Air Tour 

programs by an approved FAA/DOT drug and alcohol testing 

program, through a Consortium/Third Party

Administrator:

Professional Air Charter Services, Inc.

(program manager John Carpenter)

Drug Abatement / AMPP Consortium

Kansas City, MO

816 942 2144
#### § 225.3 Definitions.

Unless otherwise noted, these terms and their definitions are for the purpose of this part.

*Caregiver.* Defined in 38 U.S.C. 1720G(d)

*Family Caregiver.* Defined in 38 U.S.C. 1720G(d)

*Former POW.* Defined in 38 U.S.C. 101

*Service-connected.* Defined in 38 U.S.C. 101

*Veteran.* Defined in 38 U.S.C. 101
# C_2008128EN.01002902.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/29

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 April 2008 — Dainichiseika Colour & Chemicals Mfg. v OHIM (Representation of a pelican)

(Case T-389/03) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a figurative Community trade mark depicting a pelican - Earlier Community or national figurative trade mark Pelikan - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 128/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dainichiseika Colour & Chemicals Mfg. Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: J. Hofmann and B. Linstow, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Laporta Insa, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Pelikan Vertriebsgessellschaft mbH & Co.KG (Hanover, Germany) (represented by: A. Renck, V. von Bomhard and A. Pohlmann, and subsequently by A. Renck, V. von Bomhard and T. Dolde, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Chamber of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 September 2003 (Case R 191/2002-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Dainichiseika Colour & Chemicals Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Dainichiseika Colour & Chemicals Mfg. Co. Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dainichiseika Colour & Chemicals Mfg. Co. Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 21, 21.1.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 10(m)

Retirement AgreementGeneral Release  and Covenant Not to Sue

This Severance Agreement, General Release and Covenant Not to Sue ("Agreement") is made this 19th day of December, 2001, in the City of Walnut Creek, County of
Contra Costa, State of California, between LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, INC., hereinafter "Longs" and Dan R. Wilson, hereinafter "Wilson."

WHEREAS,
Wilson is an employee and employed by Longs from his hiring date of September 16, 1964, to the present. Wilson desires to retire from employment with Longs.

WHEREAS,
Longs recognizes Wilson's many contributions to the corporation and desires to enter into this Agreement.

For
and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises set forth herein, Longs and Wilson covenant and agree as follows:



1

---



2

---



3

---







|LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, INC.
|----------------------------------
|BY:                               
|BY:                               
|Dated:                            

4

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 114 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 114

                    In the matter of George Santos.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

Mr. Robert Garcia of California (for himself, Ms. Balint, Mr. Sorensen, 
Mr. Torres of New York, Mr. Goldman of New York, Mr. Cicilline, and Mr. 
  Lieu) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                          Committee on Ethics

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                    In the matter of George Santos.

    Resolved, That, pursuant to article I, section 5, clause 2 of the 
Constitution of the United States, Representative George Santos, be, 
and he hereby is, expelled from the House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
### §21132. Transfer of functions

There are transferred to the Election Assistance Commission established under section 20921 of this title all functions which the Federal Election Commission exercised under section 20508(a) of this title before October 29, 2002.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title VIII, §802(a), Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1726.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15532 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 965 

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 

to provide research and extension grants to combat plant pests and 

noxious weeds that impact coffee plants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Ms. TOKUDA (for herself, Mrs. GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N, Mr. CASE, and Mr. 

GRAVES of Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade 

Act of 1990 to provide research and extension grants 

to combat plant pests and noxious weeds that impact 

coffee plants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coffee Plant Health 

5 Initiative Amendments Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COFFEE PLANT HEALTH INITIATIVE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1672(d) of the Food, Ag8 riculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 965 IH

1 5925(d)) is amended by striking paragraph (9) and insert2 ing the following: 

3 ‘‘(9) COFFEE PLANT HEALTH INITIATIVE.— 

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Research and exten5 sion grants may be made under this section for 

6 the purposes of— 

7 ‘‘(i) developing and disseminating 

8 science-based tools and treatments to com9 bat plant pests and noxious weeds that im10 pact coffee plants; 

11 ‘‘(ii) establishing an areawide inte12 grated pest management program in areas 

13 affected by, or areas at risk of being af14 fected by, plant pests or noxious weeds 

15 that impact coffee plants; 

16 ‘‘(iii) surveying and collecting data on 

17 coffee plant production and health; 

18 ‘‘(iv) investigating coffee plant biol19 ogy, immunology, ecology, genomics, and 

20 bioinformatics; and 

21 ‘‘(v) conducting research on— 

22 ‘‘(I) factors that may contribute 

23 to or be associated with coffee plant 

24 immune systems; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 965 IH

1 ‘‘(II) other serious threats to cof2 fee plants, including the sublethal ef3 fects of insecticides, herbicides, and 

4 fungicides on insects and plants bene5 ficial to coffee plant growth; and 

6 ‘‘(III) the development of miti7 gating and preventative measures to 

8 improve habitat conservation and best 

9 management practices in coffee-grow10 ing regions. 

11 ‘‘(B) DEFINITION OF NOXIOUS WEED; 

12 PLANT PEST.—In this paragraph, the terms 

13 ‘noxious weed’ and ‘plant pest’ have the mean14 ings given those terms in section 403 of the 

15 Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7702).’’. 

16 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

17 1672(h) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and 

18 Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(h)) is amended by 

19 striking ‘‘2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2035’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1097 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1097

 Supporting the designation of March as National CHamoru Heritage and 
                             Culture Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2024

 Mr. Moylan submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the designation of March as National CHamoru Heritage and 
                             Culture Month.

Whereas CHamoru are the indigenous people of Guam and the Northern Mariana 
        Islands;
Whereas the first inhabitants of Guam and the Marianas arrived thousands of 
        years ago and cultivated an advanced seafaring culture;
Whereas the CHamoru people are i Taotao Tano' yan i Taotao Tasi, the people of 
        the land and sea;
Whereas inafa' maolek is the foundation of CHamoru culture, emphasizing respetu, 
        manginge, chenchule, and familia;
Whereas Guam and the Mariana Islands have played essential roles in trans-
        Pacific crossings for centuries;
Whereas the CHamoru people experienced Imperial Japanese occupation during World 
        War II;
Whereas the CHamoru people were essential in the United States victories at the 
        Battle of Guam, the Battle of Saipan, and the Battle of Tinian;
Whereas Guam was liberated by the United States in July 1944 following the 
        second Battle of Guam;
Whereas more than 200,000 people living in Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, 
        and the mainland United States claim CHamoru ancestry;
Whereas CHamoru men and women go on to serve in the armed services at a rate 
        higher than the national average; and
Whereas the CHamoru people are a people of resilience and perseverance: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives acknowledges the 
contributions and achievements of the CHamoru people and encourages the 
people of the United States to observe National CHamoru Heritage and 
Culture Month.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50953

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN JOSÉ GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-96-CR-62-2

- - - - - - - - - -

June 16, 1998

Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Juan José Garcia has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the brief, Garcia’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.
### **CHAPTER 3021—NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES**

Sec.
302101.
Maintenance by Secretary.
302102.
Inclusion of properties on National Register.
302103.
Criteria and regulations relating to National Register, National Historic Landmarks, and World Heritage List.
302104.
Nominations for inclusion on National Register.
302105.
Owner participation in nomination process.
302106.
Retention of name.
302107.
Regulations.
302108.
Review of threats to historic property.
§ 950.10 State regulatory program approval. The Wyoming permanent program as submitted on August 15, 1979 and as revised on October 23, 1979 and May 30, 1980, is approved effective November 26, 1980. Copies of the approved program are available at: ( a ) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Casper Field Office, 100 East B Street, room 2128, Casper, Wyoming 82601-1918, Telephone: (307) 261-5776.
( b ) Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Land Quality Division, Herschler Building, 122 West 25th Street, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002, Telephone: (307) 777-7756.
[56 FR 3219, Jan. 29, 1991]
§ 21.655 Grant. A legal instrument which, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship: ( a ) Of which the principal purpose is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Department of Defense's direct benefit or use.
( b ) In which substantial involvement is not expected between the Department of Defense and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the grant.
#### § 941.828 Special performance standards—in situ processing.

Part 828 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—In Situ Processing,* shall apply to any person who conducts in situ processing activities.
**Exhibit 31 (b)**

 

**Citizens Financial Corp.**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Citizens Financial Corp; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results in operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: 5/24/05