alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         204,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               349,240
<PP&E>                                       5,406,737
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,115,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,739,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,873
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       436,537
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,197,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,739,611
<SALES>                                        446,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               446,909
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  555,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (106,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (106,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (106,067)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE VALDEZ

- MARTINEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 19 3

- C R

Appeal from the

171 st D istrict Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 6 0D0 3097 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s fourth mot ion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until August 1 8 , 201 8

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELLANT ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Veronica Teresa Lerma

, the Appellant ’s attorney,

prepare the Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before Augus t 1 8 , 201 8

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 3 th day of Ju ly , 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
### §40701. Research and development initiative

The Administrator may establish an initiative with the objective of developing, and demonstrating in a relevant environment, technologies to enable the following commercial aircraft performance characteristics:

(1) Noise levels.—Noise levels on takeoff and on airport approach and landing that do not exceed ambient noise levels in the absence of flight operations in the vicinity of airports from which such commercial aircraft would normally operate.

(2) Energy consumption.—Twenty-five percent reduction in the energy required for medium- to long-range flights, compared to aircraft in commercial service as of December 30, 2005.

(3) Emissions.—Nitrogen oxides on take-off and landing that are significantly reduced, without adversely affecting hydrocarbons and smoke, relative to aircraft in commercial service as of December 30, 2005.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3390.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40701 | 42 U.S.C. 16722(a). | Pub. L. 109–155, title IV, §422(a), Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2924. |

Section

In paragraphs (2) and (3), the date "December 30, 2005" is substituted for "the date of enactment of this Act" to reflect the date of enactment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–155, 119 Stat. 2895).
#### § 885.22 When and how can my grant be terminated for convenience?

Either you or we may terminate the grant for convenience following the procedures in 43 CFR part 12.
### §1114. Surface transportation security technology information sharing

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Information sharing

The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, shall establish a program to provide appropriate information that the Department has gathered or developed on the performance, use, and testing of technologies that may be used to enhance railroad, public transportation, and surface transportation security to surface transportation entities, including railroad carriers, over-the-road bus operators and terminal owners and operators, motor carriers, public transportation agencies, owners or operators of highways, pipeline operators, and State, local, and tribal governments that provide security assistance to such entities.

#### (2) Designation of qualified antiterrorism technologies

The Secretary shall include in such information provided in paragraph (1) whether the technology is designated as a qualified antiterrorism technology under the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–296) [6 U.S.C. 441 et seq.], as appropriate.

#### (b) Purpose

The purpose of the program is to assist eligible grant recipients under this Act and others, as appropriate, to purchase and use the best technology and equipment available to meet the security needs of the Nation's surface transportation system.

#### (c) Coordination

The Secretary shall ensure that the program established under this section makes use of and is consistent with other Department technology testing, information sharing, evaluation, and standards-setting programs, as appropriate.

(Pub. L. 110–53, title XIII, §1305, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 394.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), is subtitle G (§§861–865) of title VIII of Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2238, also known as the SAFETY Act, which is classified generally to part G (§441 et seq.) of subchapter VIII of chapter 1 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.

This Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 110–53, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 266, known as the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, which enacted this chapter and enacted and amended numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2007 Amendment note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.
#### Joseph U. Fiore, Appellant, v. Pasquale Amoruso et al., Respondents, and Frank Ferrino et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Oral motion by appellant for a further extension of time to perfect appeal, granted; time extended to the March Term, beginning February 27, 1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Oral cross motion by intervenors-respondents to dismiss appeal, denied. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before February 21, 1961. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.
NUMBER 13-18-00657-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

EX PARTE WILLIAM TRAYLOR MASSEY

On appeal from the 377th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Appellee’s counsel, Constance Filley Johnson, has filed a motion to withdraw as 

counsel. We GRANT said motion. Pursuant to Rule 6.5(c) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure, counsel is directed to notify appellee, in writing, of any previously 

undisclosed deadlines and file a copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court. 

Appellee is directed to notify the Court promptly if he retains new counsel on appeal 

by filing a notice including that attorney’s name, mailing address, email address, 

telephone number, facsimile number, and State Bar of Texas identification number. See 
2

generally TEX. R. APP. P. 6. In the interim, the Court expects this appeal to proceed as 

per the appellate rules. Appellee is expected to comply with all applicable deadlines and 

filings should comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

5th day of March, 2019.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9934 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9934

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide transportation to and 
   from Department of Veterans Affairs facilities in connection with 
                vocational rehabilitation or counseling.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2024

Mr. Panetta (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, and Mr. Lieu) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide transportation to and 
   from Department of Veterans Affairs facilities in connection with 
                vocational rehabilitation or counseling.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Earned Transportation Act'' 
or the ``Vets ETA''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO 
              PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION TO AND FROM DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS FACILITIES IN CONNECTION WITH VOCATIONAL 
              REHABILITATION OR COUNSELING.

    Section 111A(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1) The Secretary'' and inserting ``The 
        Secretary''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (2).
                                 <all>
```
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
|----------------------------------------



|18 U.S.C. Certification of Richard A. Mansfield
      
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of 
      Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|I, Richard A. Mansfield,  Vice President,  Chief
Financial Officer of Duckwall-ALCO  Stores,  Inc., hereby certify,  in accordance with
18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (a) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November  2, 2003, which accompanies
this certification, fully complies with  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The
information contained the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for  the quarter ended November
2, 2003, which accompanies this  certification, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the  financial condition and results of operation of Duckwall-ALCO  Stores, Inc.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been  provided to Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and will be
retained by Duckwall-ALCO  Stores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its  staff upon request.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:  December 5, 2003
|------------------------



| | By: | /s/ Richard A. Mansfield
      Richard A. Mansfield 
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | 
| |  | 



---
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1134 

Expressing support for the designation of April 11, 2024, as 

‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2024 

Ms. STEVENS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of April 11, 2024, 

as ‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’. 

Whereas remanufacturing is a comprehensive and rigorous 

industrial process by which a previously sold, leased, 

used, worn, remanufactured, or nonfunctional product or 

part is returned to a like-new, same-as-when-new, or better-than-when-new condition, from both a quality and 

performance perspective, through a controlled, reproducible, and sustainable process; 

Whereas a 2012 United States International Trade Commission (ITC) report found that remanufacturers support at 

least 180,000 full-time jobs in the United States, and the 

ITC report states that production of remanufactured 

goods in the United States increased by 15 percent from 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1134 IH 

2009 to 2011 and exports totaled $11,200,000,000 annually; 

Whereas remanufacturing has been recognized by leading 

universities, research institutions, and manufacturers in 

the United States as good for the environment for its 

ability to divert end-of-life products from landfills; 

Whereas, by encouraging businesses, State agencies, nonprofit organizations, schools, and individuals to celebrate 

‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’ on April 11, 2024, Congress can 

further promote remanufacturing as environmentally 

friendly and economically smart; and 

Whereas, to focus the attention of the United States on the 

benefits of remanufacturing, businesses, educational institutions, and nonprofit organizations have joined together 

to celebrate ‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’ and are encouraging their colleagues, friends and families, and their 

communities to learn more about the benefits of remanufactured products: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/Aof Lancer Corporation, as filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark L. Freitas, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| April 22, 2005 | /s/ MARK L.  FREITAS     |   |
|----------------|--------------------------|--------|
|           | Mark L. Freitas,         |
|           | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
### §6384. Employment and benefits protection

(a) Any employee who takes leave under section 6382 for the intended purpose of the leave shall be entitled, upon return from such leave—

(1) to be restored by the employing agency to the position held by the employee when the leave commenced; or

(2) to be restored to an equivalent position with equivalent benefits, pay, status, and other terms and conditions of employment.

(b) The taking of leave under section 6382 shall not result in the loss of any employment benefit accrued prior to the date on which the leave commenced.

(c) Except as otherwise provided by or under law, nothing in this section shall be construed to entitle any restored employee to—

(1) the accrual of any employment benefits during any period of leave; or

(2) any right, benefit, or position of employment other than any right, benefit, or position to which the employee would have been entitled had the employee not taken the leave.

(d) As a condition to restoration under subsection (a) for an employee who takes leave under section 6382(a)(1)(D), the employing agency may have a uniformly applied practice or policy that requires each such employee to receive certification from the health care provider of the employee that the employee is able to resume work.

(e) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit an employing agency from requiring an employee on leave under section 6382 to report periodically to the employing agency on the status and intention of the employee to return to work.

(Added Pub. L. 103–3, title II, §201(a)(1), Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 22.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of Title 29, Labor.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Scott B. Hall, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 913]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), rendered January 7, 2004, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), assault in the first degree (two counts), criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*670Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has not raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Schmidt, J.E, Krausman, Goldstein, Covello and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7405

TIMOTHY R. MUELLER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JOHN M. JABE, Deputy Director of Operations,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior 

District Judge. (7:10-cv-00239-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 29, 2010

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy R. Mueller, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy R. Mueller seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his motions to appoint counsel, for class 

certification, and to amend his complaint. No final judgment 

has been entered in the underlying case, which remains pending 

in the district court.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). To the extent that Mueller seeks to appeal the 

district court’s denial of his motions for appointment of 

counsel and to amend his complaint, we lack jurisdiction over 

the appeal in the absence of a final judgment. Further, 

although an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion for 

class certification may proceed with leave of this court, Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 23(f); see Fed. R. App. P. 5, Mueller has not 

properly petitioned this court for such leave. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We deny Mueller’s motion to this court for 

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Eugene Williams. (B) The People of the State of New York v. John Joseph Duffy. (C) The People of the State of New York v. Andrew Kay.

Concur—McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.— [In each action] Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court filed herein.