alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 24, 2015

Mr. Joel B. Coggins

1411 West Main Street 

Greeneville TN 37743

Dear Mr. Coggins:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 13, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0450), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### § 2003.10 Approval, amendment, and publication of bylaws, rules, and procedures (Article X).

Approval and amendment of Panel bylaws, rules, and procedures requires the affirmative vote of at least four members. The Executive Secretary submits approved bylaws, rules, procedures, and their amendments, for publication in the Federal Register.
§ 2400.28 Dissemination of classified information. Heads of OSTP offices shall establish procedures consistent with this Regulation for dissemination of classified material. The originating official may prescribe specific restrictions on dissemination of classified information when necessary. ( a ) Classified information shall not be disseminated outside the executive branch except under conditions that ensure that the information will be given protection equivalent to that afforded within the executive branch.
( b ) Except as provided by directives issued by the President through the National Security Council, classified information originating in one agency may not be disseminated outside any other agency to which it has been made available without the consent of the originating agency. For purposes of this Section, the Department of Defense shall be considered one agency.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-541]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Seventeenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight 
Vision/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight Vision/
Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
seventeenth meeting of RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight 
Vision/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

DATES: The meeting will be held February 7-9, 2012, from 8 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Universal Avionics Systems 
Corporation, 3260 E. Universal Way, Tucson, AZ 85756.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight Vision/
Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS). The agenda will include the 
following:

February 7, 2012

     Introductions and Administrative Items
     Review and approve minutes from last full plenary meeting
     Introductions and administrative items
     Review and approve minutes from last full plenary meeting
     ED-179B status and update

February 8, 2012

 Plenary discussion (0800-1700, including breaks and lunch)
     Work Group 2 (VS) Discussion
     Work Group 1 (SVS/CVS) break discussion out if needed

February 9, 2012

 Plenary discussion (0800-1500, including breaks and lunch)
     E Work Group 1 and 2 Update
     Administrative items (meeting schedule)
 Adjourn at 1500

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 5, 2012.
John Raper,
Manager, Business Operations Branch, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-541 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
§ 241.1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to implement section 1110 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111-84), which authorizes DoD to implement a Pilot Program for the Temporary Exchange of Information Technology (IT) Personnel. This statute authorizes the temporary assignment of DoD IT employees to private sector organizations. This statute also gives DoD the authority to accept private sector IT employees assigned under the Pilot. This program is referred to as the Information Technology Exchange Program (ITEP) pilot.
( b ) DoD Component authorized approving official may approve assignments as a mechanism for improving the DoD workforce's competency in using IT to deliver government information and services. DoD Component authorized approving official may not make assignments under this part to circumvent personnel ceilings, or as a substitute for other more appropriate personnel decisions or actions. Approved assignments must meet the strategic program goals of the DoD Components. The benefits to the DoD Components and the private sector organizations are the primary considerations in initiating assignments; not the desires or personal needs of an individual employee.
# C_2009180EN.01004002.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/40

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2009 — Socratec v Commission

(Case T-269/03) (1)

1

(‘Competition - Concentrations - Market in road traffic telematic systems - Applicant declared insolvent in course of proceedings - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate’)

2009/C 180/73

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Socratec — Satellite Navigation Consulting, Research & Technology GmbH (Regensburg) (represented by: M. Adolf and M. Lüken, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: initially S. Rating, then A. Whelan and K. Mojzesowicz, and latterly K. Mojzesowicz and X. Lewis, agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Qualcomm Wireless Business Solutions Europe BV (Waarle, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Berrisch and D.W. Hull, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Daimler AG, formerly DaimlerChrysler AG (Stuttgart, Germany); Daimler Financial Services AG, formerly DaimlerChrysler Services AG (Berlin, Germany); Deutsche Telekom AG (Bonn, Germany); Toll Collect GmbH (Berlin) (represented by: J. Schütze and A. von Graevenitz, lawyers); and Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially C. D. Quassowski and S. Flockermann, then M. Lumma, agents, assisted by U. Karpenstein and A. Rosenfeld, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision 2003/792/EC of 30 April 2003 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2903 — DaimlerChrysler/Deutsche Telekom Joint Venture) (OJ 2003 L 300, p. 62).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | orders Socratec — Satellite Navigation Consulting, Research & Technology GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the Commission, Daimler AG, Daimler Financial Services AG, Deutsche Telekom AG and Toll Collect GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Socratec — Satellite Navigation Consulting, Research & Technology GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the Commission, Daimler AG, Daimler Financial Services AG, Deutsche Telekom AG and Toll Collect GmbH;

| 3. | orders Qualcomm Wireless Business Solutions Europe BV to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders Qualcomm Wireless Business Solutions Europe BV to bear its own costs;

| 4. | orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 18.10.2003.

1

---
#### § 2003.7 Support Staff (Article VII).

The staff of the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), National Archives and Records Administration, provides program and administrative support for the Panel. The Executive Secretary supervises the staff in this function pursuant to the direction of the Chair and ISCAP. On an as-needed basis, the Panel may seek detailees from agencies to augment the ISOO staff in support of the ISCAP. All staff must meet security access criteria in order to fulfill the Panel's functions.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

EARL GRAMBY,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 634 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
## Rules and Regulations

Special regulations help protect resources and visitors at DeSoto National Wildlife Refuge.  Please consult the refuge specific regulations brochure available at the kiosks or contact the visitor center for complete rules and regulations.  Visitors are permitted on the refuge 1/2 hour before sunrise until 1/2 hour after sunset.  An entrance fee is required.
          - Wildlife observation  from vehicles encouraged. Vehicles are allowed on public roads and designated parking areas only.  
          - Anglers  are welcome on DeSoto Lake from April 15 to October 14. State and federal regulations apply. An Iowa or Nebraska license is required.  Archery and spearfishing are permitted for roughfish only.
          - Boating  and paddling operation is permitted in accordance with state regulations.  Boating is limited to no-wake speeds not to exceed 5 mph.  DeSoto Lake closed October 15-April 14.
          - Limited  hunting  is available.  Refer to  hunting brochure  for more information.
          - Mushroom gathering  for personal consumption only is permitted in open areas of the refuge from April 15 through October 14.

**Prohibited Activities:**
          - Trespassing into closed areas.
          - Launching, landing, or disturbing wildlife by aircraft (drones) on the Refuge.
          - Camping, open fires, overnight parking, or any night fishing activities on the refuge.
          - Swimming on any refuge waters.
          - Horseback riding
          - Collecting or destruction of plant and animal life.
          - Collecting shed deer antlers
          - Searching for or removing artifacts or objects of antiquity.
          - Use of motorized All Terrain Vehicles (ATVs, snowmobiles, etc.)

This is a partial list of rules and regulations.  Consult the refuge regulations brochure for more details.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Cooperative Associations in Europe and Their Possibilities for Post-War Reconstruction

              																	Cowan, Helen I.					 and 	Parker, Florence E. (Florence Evelyn). 						*Cooperative Associations in Europe and Their Possibilities for Post-War Reconstruction : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 770*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4251,			accessed on September 24, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Annual Report of SEDONA Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the year endingDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Annual Report”), I, Marco A. Emrich, Chief Executive Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of SEDONA Corporation.        Dated:  April 16, 2007 /s/ MARCO A. EMRICH   Marco A. Emrich   President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 1900.22 Action and determination(s) by originator(s) or any interested party. ( a ) *Initial action for access.* ( 1 ) CIA components tasked pursuant to a FOIA request shall conduct a reasonable search of all relevant record systems within their areas of responsibility which have not been exempted from search, review, and disclosure under the FOIA by the CIA Information Act of 1984 and which are reasonably likely to contain records responsive to the request. They shall: ( i ) Determine whether any responsive records exist;
( ii ) Determine whether, and to what extent, any FOIA exemptions, as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(b), apply to the responsive records;
( iii ) Review the exempt records to determine whether they contain any reasonably segregable, non-exempt material;
( iv ) Approve the disclosure of all non-exempt records, or portions of records, within their areas of responsibility; and
( v ) Forward to the Coordinator all records approved for release or necessary for coordination with or referral to another component or interested party.
( 2 ) In making the decisions discussed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the CIA component officers shall be guided by the applicable law as well as the procedures specified at §§ 1900.31 and 1900.32 regarding confidential commercial or financial information and personal information (about persons other than the requester).
( b ) *Referrals and coordinations.* As applicable, any CIA records containing information originated by other CIA components shall be forwarded to those entities for appropriate action in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section. Records originated by other Federal agencies or CIA records containing other Federal agency information shall be forwarded to such agencies for appropriate action in accordance with the applicable procedures of each agency.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. RI CH A RD STEV EN RI ESS, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 10070 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - CR- 0 0 7 2 3 - SRB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona S us an R . B ol t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R ic h ar dS te v e n R ie s s ap p e a ls f r o m h is ju ry - tr ia l c o n v ic tio n an d2 4 - m o n th s e nt e nc e f

orpe r j ury , i n vi ol a t i on of

18 U . S . C . § 1621 and f a l s e l yr e pr e s e nt i ng h im s e lf to b e ac itiz e n o f

th e U n ite dS ta te s , in v io la tio n o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 9 1 1 . 

# FI LED APR20 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 10070 2 P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), R i es s’ coun se l has fi l ed a bri ef

st at i ng there ar e no g roun ds for r el i ef , al on g w i th a m ot i on t o w i thd raw a s c ouns e l of

r e c or d. A ppe l l antha s f i l e d apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f , butno ans w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o ar g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. A cco rd i n g l y, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D, and the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en ti s AF F I RME D.
§ 1700.1 Authority and purpose. ( a ) This part is issued under the authority of the Freedom of Information Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552; the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C. 3023-3025; and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Public Law 108-458, 118 Stat. 3638.
( b ) This part prescribes procedures for: ( 1 ) ODNI administration of the FOIA;
( 2 ) Requesting records from ODNI pursuant to the FOIA; and
( 3 ) Filing an administrative appeal with ODNI of an initial adverse decision under the FOIA.
( c ) This part contains the rules that ODNI follows in processing requests for records under the FOIA. The rules in this part should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 118 

Maintaining Medicare. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Ms. VAN DUYNE (for herself, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. WITTMAN, Mrs. MILLER of 

West Virginia, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Ms. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. MILLS, 

Mrs. LESKO, Mr. MCCORMICK, Mrs. MCCLAIN, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. 

DONALDS, and Mr. JACKSON of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in 

addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Maintaining Medicare. 

Whereas, created in 1965, Medicare was established to provide Government health insurance to senior citizens; 

Whereas now roughly 65,200,000 individuals utilize Medicare 

to provide health care coverage; 

Whereas under President Biden, health care prices have risen 

nearly 30 percent in 2022 where seniors and everyday 

Americans saw the largest increase on record; 

Whereas, due in part to the increased cost of living caused 

by President Biden’s mismanagement of the economy, the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 118 IH 

standard Medicare beneficiary saw an increase of $21.60 

a month for their 2022 premiums; 

Whereas, during the 117th Congress, funds meant for Medicare were reallocated to pay for partisan policies outside 

of the Medicare program in the Inflation Reduction Act; 

Whereas Democrats cut over $289,000,000 out of Medicare 

to give insurance companies handouts to boost 

Obamacare and finance Democrats’ pet green energy 

projects instead of strengthening Medicare for future 

generations; and 

Whereas President Biden has accused House Republicans of 

threatening to cut Medicare: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the House of Representatives affirms cur3 rent retirees and those nearing retirement expect 

4 certain Medicare commitments to be made, as Medi5 care has been one of the vital pillars for senior citi6 zens to access health care; and 

7 (2) it is the sense of the House of Representa8 tives that its commitment to the United States is to 

9 save and strengthen Medicare and no longer use 

10 Medicare as a slush fund to finance Democrats’ par11 tisan policy agenda. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.

                                  Subsidiaries

                                                                Percentage of
                                             Jursidiction     Voting Stock Owned
Name of Subsidiary                         of Incorporation     by Registration
------------------                         ----------------     ---------------

Ben & Jerry's Canada (1992), Inc.               Canada               100%

Ben & Jerry's Children's Center, Inc.           Vermont              100%

Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Ltd.                United Kingdom           100%

Ben & Jerry's Homemade (FSC), Inc.             Barbados              100%

Ben & Jerry's Homemade Holdings, Inc.           Vermont              100%

Ben & Jerry's of New York                      New York              100%

Ben & Jerry's International, Inc.              Delaware              100%

Ben & Jerry's France SARL                       France               100%
#### Oscar W. Schneider, appellant, v. Otto Neubert et al., appellees.

Gen. No. 7,347.

Suit on contract. Judgment for defendants. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry county; the Hon. C. J. Searle, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 27, 1925.

Sturtz & Ewan, for appellant.

Thomas J. Welch and Andrews & O’Connor, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.