alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §557. Reference

With respect to any function transferred by or under this chapter (including under a reorganization plan that becomes effective under section 542 of this title) and exercised on or after the effective date of this chapter, reference in any other Federal law to any department, commission, or agency or any officer or office the functions of which are so transferred shall be deemed to refer to the Secretary, other official, or component of the Department to which such function is so transferred.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XV, §1517, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2311.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, known as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.

The effective date of this chapter, referred to in text, is 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of this title.
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Kehoe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of MS Structured Asset Corp.
on behalf of SATURNS Trust No. 2002-4;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National
Association and its officers and agents.



                                                   By: /s/ John Kehoe
                                                      ----------------------
                                                   Name:  John Kehoe
                                                   Title: Vice President
                                                   Date:  February 27, 2004
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

Consent of Independent Auditors

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-182192) of McEwen Mining Inc.,

 

(2)Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-178306) of McEwen Mining Inc., and

 

(3) Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-144563, 333-144569, 333-112269, 333-36600, 333-179144 and 333-179143);

 

of our report dated June 30, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Minera Santa Cruz S.A. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of McEwen Mining Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

 
| City   of Buenos Aires, Argentina               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| June 30,   2014                            |   |
|                                            |   |
|                                            |   |
| /s/   Pistrelli, Henry Martin y Asociados S.R.L |   |
| PISTRELLI,   HENRY MARTIN Y ASOCIADOS S.R.L.    |   |
| Member of Ernst & Young Global         |   |

 

----
§ 884.17 Other uses by certified States and Indian tribes. ( a ) The reclamation plan for a certified State or Indian tribe may provide for the construction of specific public facilities related to the coal or minerals industries in States impacted by coal or minerals development. This form of assistance is available when the Governor of the State or the head of a governing body of an Indian tribe determines there is a need for such activities or construction and the Director concurs.
( b ) Grant applications for uses other than coal reclamation by certified States and Indian tribes may be submitted in accordance with § 885.15 of this chapter.
[47 FR 28600, June 30, 1982, as amended at 73 FR 67642, Nov. 14, 2008; 80 FR 6447, Feb. 5, 2015]
### §8525. Effect on other statutes

(a) Subsection (b)(2) does not apply to an individual who—

(1) is otherwise entitled to compensation under this subchapter;

(2) is described in section 3311(b) of title 38;

(3) is not receiving retired pay under title 10; and

(4) was discharged or released from service in the Armed Forces or the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (including through a reduction in force) under honorable conditions, but did not voluntarily separate from such service.

(b) An individual is not entitled to compensation under this subchapter for any period with respect to which the individual receives—

(1) a subsistence allowance under chapter 31 of title 38 or under part VIII of Veterans Regulation Numbered 1(a);

(2) except in the case of an individual described in subsection (a), an educational assistance allowance under chapter 33 of title 38; or

(3) an educational assistance allowance under chapter 35 of title 38.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 591; Pub. L. 90–83, §1(90), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 219; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title V, §560, Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 828.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 42 U.S.C. 1371(g)–(i). | Aug. 28, 1958, Pub. L. 85–848, §3 "Sec. 1511 (g)–(i)", 72 Stat. 1089.Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–857, §13(i)(3), 72 Stat. 1265. |

Statutes at Large

Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–857, §13(i)(3), 72 Stat. 1265.

In subsection (b), the words "an education and training allowance under subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d) of section 1632 of title 38" are omitted as obsolete. The authority to pay an education and training allowance under section 1632 of title 38 terminated on January 31, 1965, pursuant to section 1613(a) of title 38.

Section 1371(i) of title 42, providing that certain individuals are not entitled to unemployment compensation under the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 41 of title 38, is omitted as obsolete. Subchapter I of chapter 41 of title 38, which related to unemployment compensation for Korean conflict veterans, was repealed by the Act of Sept. 19, 1962, Pub. L. 87–675, 76 Stat. 558.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### 1967 Act

This section deletes subsection (a) of 5 U.S.C. 8525. That subsection is now obsolete in view of the repeal, effective July 1, 1966, of chapter 43 of title 38, U.S.C., by Public Law 89–50, section 1(a) (79 Stat. 173).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2015—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–92, §560(b), added subsec. (a).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–92, §560(a)(1), substituted "the individual receives" for "he receives" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (b)(2), (3). Pub. L. 114–92, §560(a)(2)–(4), added par. (2) and redesignated former par. (2) as (3).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                         DIAPULSE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                                   FORM 10-QSB
                   For the Quarter Period ended March 31, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Item 7.  Certifications

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 C.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diapulse, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 C.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
         of the Company.


         By:     /s/ Jesse Ross                           May 4, 2004
                ----------------------------
                  Jesse Ross
                  Chief Executive Officer
#### § 57.22313 Explosion-protection systems (I-C mines).

Pressure-relief systems including vents, or explosion suppression systems, shall be provided on explosive dust handling and processing equipment and on facilities housing such equipment. Vents shall be installed so that forces are directed away from persons should an explosion occur. The ratio of vent size to internal size of the equipment or facility shall not be less than one square foot of vent for each 80 cubic feet of volume or space.
### §7351. Gifts to superiors

(a) An employee may not—

(1) solicit a contribution from another employee for a gift to an official superior;

(2) make a donation as a gift or give a gift to an official superior; or

(3) accept a gift from an employee receiving less pay than himself.

(b) An employee who violates this section shall be subject to appropriate disciplinary action by the employing agency or entity.

(c) Each supervising ethics office (as defined in section 7353(d)(1)) is authorized to issue regulations implementing this section, including regulations exempting voluntary gifts or contributions that are given or received for special occasions such as marriage or retirement or under other circumstances in which gifts are traditionally given or exchanged.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 527; Pub. L. 101–194, title III, §301, Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1745; Pub. L. 101–280, §4(a), May 4, 1990, 104 Stat. 157.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 113. | R.S. §1784. |

Statutes at Large

The application of the section is confined to employees, since the President and Members of Congress, though officers, could not have been intended to be "summarily discharged", and members of uniformed services are not covered by this statute. In the last sentence, the word "removed" is substituted for "summarily discharged" because of the provisions of the Lloyd-LaFollette Act, 37 Stat. 555, as amended, and the Veterans' Preference Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 387, as amended, which are carried into this title.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 101–280, §4(a)(1), inserted "or give a gift" after "donation as a gift".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–280, §4(a)(2), substituted "Each supervising ethics office (as defined in section 7353(d)(1))" for "The Office of Government Ethics" and "circumstances in which gifts are traditionally given or exchanged" for "similar circumstances".

1989—Pub. L. 101–194 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), struck out "An employee who violates this section shall be removed from the service." at end, and added subsecs. (b) and (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Inapplicability to Transfers of Unused Accrued Annual Leave by Federal Employees; Exception

Pub. L. 100–284, Apr. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 81, provided that section 7351 of this title would not apply to leave transfers under certain programs covering Federal employees during fiscal year ending on Sept. 30, 1988, except as the Office of Personnel Management may by regulation prescribe.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Cyanotech Corporation:

We
have issued our report dated June 24, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule listed in index appearing under 15(a)(2) in the
Annual Report of Cyanotech Corporation and subsidiary on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of Cyanotech Corporation and subsidiary on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-42486, 333-97755, and 333-101401) and on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-63789,
333-42484, 333-141911, 333-141912 and 333-154165).

/s/
Grant Thornton LLP

Honolulu,
Hawaii
June 24, 2009

---



QuickLinks
#### Stephen Guzy, Appellant, v. Hazel M. Guzy et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for false imprisonment, plaintiff appeals: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 18, 1959, which grants the motion of defendant Vickers (sued herein as Viekors) to dismiss the complaint as against him on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4); and (2) from so much of an order of said court, dated March 18, 1959, as denies plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint upon all the defendants. Plaintiff was confined to a mental institution for treatment and observation on the petition of defendant Guzy, his former wife, and on the unverified certificate of the defendant physicians, Sherwood and Viekors, upon which an order of commitment was signed by a Supreme Court Justice. This action is brought against the said wife and physicians to recover damages for false imprisonment on the theory that plaintiff was sane at the time of his commitment and that the petition and certificates of defendants were false and fraudulent. Order of March 18, 1959, insofar as appealed from, and order of February 18, 1959, affirmed, without costs. *(Douglas*v. *State of New York,*269 App. Div. 521, affd. 296 N. Y. 530; *Warner*v. *State of New York,*297 N. Y. 395; *Fischer*v. *Langbein,*103 N. Y. 84; *Mezullo*v. *Maletz,*331 Mass. 233.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### §§ 1699.161-1699.169 [Reserved]
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF

LONGS DRUG STORES CORPORATION



|                                   |  |                                         
|---------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                                   |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporationor Formation
|                                   | 
|Longs Drug Stores California, Inc. |  | California                              
|                                   | 
|RxAmerica L.L.C.                   |  | Delaware                                
|                                   | 
|Accendo Holding Company            |  | Delaware                                
|                                   | 
|Escalante Solutions, LLC           |  | Delaware                                
|                                   | 
|LDG Property Company, Inc.         |  | California                              
|                                   | 
|LDG Property Company, LLC          |  | California                              
|                                   | 
|Accendo Insurance Company          |  | Utah
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Lawn, Appellant, against Samuel Sheran et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Claimant appeals from a decision of the board which held that he was not an employee of the respondent employer at the time he was injured performing janitorial duties in respondent’s building. The decision could be affirmed on this record on the basis that an employer-employee relationship was not established; that respondent Sheran never authorized his part-time superintendent Hafner to hire claimant or anyone else in his building; that claimant was only hired to work at the East 94th Street building owned by Dr. Henry Smuckier (not Duff and Brown as stated in the board’s decision) and that any work claimant did in respondent’s building was gratuitous as a favor to Hafner, and not as a result of any agreement or contract of hire. Perhaps that is what the board meant in its decision but the inclusion of the *563statement “ there was a mutual arrangement between the superintendents of both premises to relieve each other from time to time without recompense to either.” which is completely without foundation in the record requires us to reverse and remit. Decision reversed and claim remitted, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
#### § 912.764 Process for designating areas unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.

Part 764 of this chapter, *State Processes for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* pertaining to petitioning, initial processing, hearing requirements, decisions, data base and inventory systems, public information, and regulatory responsibilities shall apply to surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended October 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                    FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                      OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                623,688
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         175,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           20,000
<INVENTORY>                                                            78,684
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      997,957
<PP&E>                                                                405,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        188,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      1,431,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 453,517
<BONDS>                                                               151,789
<COMMON>                                                              289,282
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            536,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        1,431,152
<SALES>                                                             1,139,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    1,139,368
<CGS>                                                                 726,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       1,205,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      4,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       (35,991)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   (35,991)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        182,716
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          146,725
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             .05



</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 8, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00525

- CV

M. H., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY
BEFORE C HIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTI CES TRIANA AND SMITH MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order of termination signed by the tr i a l court on July 19, 2019

.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s order but that there are clerical error s requi ring corre ction.

Therefore, the C ourt modifies the trial court’s order to replace the wo rd “ mother ” with “ father ”

in Paragra ph s 7.2.3

. and 7.2.4

. of the ord er . The Court affirms the order as modified. Because

appellant is indigent and u nable to pay cost s, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
### §3705. Application to Office of the Chief Technology Officer of the District of Columbia

(a) In General.—The Chief Technology Officer of the District of Columbia may arrange for the assignment of an employee of the Office of the Chief Technology Officer to a private sector organization, or an employee of a private sector organization to such Office, in the same manner as the head of an agency under this chapter.

(b) Terms and Conditions.—An assignment made pursuant to subsection (a) shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as an assignment made by the head of an agency under this chapter, except that in applying such terms and conditions to an assignment made pursuant to subsection (a), any reference in this chapter to a provision of law or regulation of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the applicable provision of law or regulation of the District of Columbia, including the applicable provisions of the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 (sec. 1–601.01 et seq., D.C. Official Code) and section 601 of the District of Columbia Campaign Finance Reform and Conflict of Interest Act (sec. 1–1106.01, D.C. Official Code).

(c) Definition.—For purposes of this section, the term "Office of the Chief Technology Officer" means the office established in the executive branch of the government of the District of Columbia under the Office of the Chief Technology Officer Establishment Act of 1998 (sec. 1–1401 et seq., D.C. Official Code).

(Added Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §209(c)(1), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2929.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978, referred to in subsec. (b), is an act of the District of Columbia and is not classified to the Code.

The District of Columbia Campaign Finance Reform and Conflict of Interest Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 93–376, Aug. 14, 1974, 88 Stat. 447, which is not classified to the Code.

The Office of the Chief Technology Officer Establishment Act of 1998, referred to in subsec. (c), is an act of the District of Columbia and is not classified to the Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days after Dec. 17, 2002, see section 402(a) of Pub. L. 107–347, set out as a note under section 3601 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.