alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-20-00154-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 233rd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 233-652702-18

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

DONNY W. NEVELS, Appellant

V.

JOYCE B. NEVELS-MILLER, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On October 28, 2020, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as 

the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with 

the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the 

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 10, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 245 (Monday, December 21, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the President's Cancer 
Panel.
    The meeting will be held as a virtual meeting and open to the 
public. Individuals who plan to view the virtual meeting and need 
special assistance or other reasonable accommodations to view the 
meeting should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the 
meeting. The meeting can be accessed by clicking on the following link: 
https://nci.rev.vbrick.com/#/webcasts/presidentscancerpanel.

    Name of Committee: President's Cancer Panel.
    Date: February 11, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: Improving Resilience and Equity in Cancer Screening: 
Innovation to Increase Screening.
    Place: National Institutes of Health 31 Center Drive, Building 
31, Room 11A48, Rockville, MD 20850 (Virtual Meeting) Access to 
Meeting: https://nci.rev.vbrick.com/#/webcasts/presidentscancerpanel.
    Contact Person: Maureen R. Johnson, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, 
President's Cancer Panel, Special Assistant to the Director, 
National Cancer Institute, NIH, 31 Center Drive, Room 11A48 MSC 
2590, Bethesda, MD 20892, 240-781-3327, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bf1f4f3f5e8f4f5e9dbf6faf2f7b5f5f2f3b5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f454047415c40415d6f424e46430141464701484059">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/pcp/index.htm, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 15, 2020.
Patricia B. Hansberger,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-28100 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,304
<PP&E>                                          54,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,108
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           895
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,347
<SALES>                                        102,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,230
<CGS>                                           89,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,377
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,385
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,992
<DISCONTINUED>                                     206
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,198
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
#### § 174.16 Real property containing explosive or chemical agent hazards.

The DoD Component controlling real property known to contain or suspected of containing explosive or chemical agent hazards from past DoD military munitions-related or chemical warfare-related activities shall, prior to transfer of the property out of Department of Defense control, obtain the DoD Explosives Safety Board's approval of measures planned to ensure protectiveness from such hazards, in accordance with DoD Directive 6055.9E, *Explosives Safety Management and the DoD Explosives Safety Board.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1240 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1240

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4121) to protect an 
    individual's ability to access contraceptives and to engage in 
   contraception and to protect a health care provider's ability to 
   provide contraceptives, contraception, and information related to 
                             contraception.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2024

 Ms. Manning submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4121) to protect an 
    individual's ability to access contraceptives and to engage in 
   contraception and to protect a health care provider's ability to 
   provide contraceptives, contraception, and information related to 
                             contraception.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution, the 
House shall proceed to the consideration in the House of the bill (H.R. 
4121) to protect an individual's ability to access contraceptives and 
to engage in contraception and to protect a health care provider's 
ability to provide contraceptives, contraception, and information 
related to contraception. The bill shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce or 
their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the 
consideration of H.R. 4121.
                                 <all>
```
### §4319. Fugitives from justice barred from recovery

No person shall be entitled to the return of any property or money under any provision of this chapter, or any amendment of this chapter, who is a fugitive from justice of the United States or any State or Territory thereof, or the District of Columbia.

(Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, §22, as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 285, §2, 42 Stat. 1516; amended Mar. 10, 1928, ch. 167, §16, 45 Stat. 275.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, 40 Stat. 411, known as the Trading with the enemy Act, also known as the Trading with the Enemy Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 4301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 22 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1928—Act Mar. 10, 1928, inserted ", or any amendment of this chapter," after "any provision of this chapter".
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Chandler Air Service, 

COMPLAINANT 

City of Chandler, AZ 

RESPONDENT. FAA Docket No. 16-13-05 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to September 11 , 2015. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

Randall S. Fiertz 

Director, Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

A"'s r-1 j 1.o t r 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August ~ , 2015, I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice of Extension of Time to 

September 11, 2015, for FAA Docket 16-13-08 addressed to: 

Timothy McCulloch 

Hinshaw and Culbertson LLP 

2375 East Camelback Road, Suite 750 

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

W. Eric Pilsk 

Daniel S. Reimer 

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell, LLP 

l 0 I Connecticut A venue NW Suite 800 

Washington, DC 20036 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, A CO-l 00 

FAA Airports District Office, Phoenix, AZ 

Jaudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
### SUBCHAPTER V—ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–354, §2(1), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 944, redesignated subchapter III of this chapter as this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Administrative Conference of United States

Pub. L. 104–52, title IV, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 480, authorized $600,000 for the prompt and orderly termination of the Administrative Conference of the United States by Feb. 1, 1996.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-30286 

Summary Calendar

 

RICKY SEABERRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD STALDER; VENETIA MICHAEL;

ROBERT DUNN; ORLANDO BEENE,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:04-CV-1875

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricky Seaberry, Louisiana prisoner # 131369, moves for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal following the

district court’s denial of IFP and order that he pay the filing

fee because he is barred by the three strikes provision of 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). Seaberry alleges that he faces an imminent

threat of serious physical injury because a fellow inmate

assaulted him as a result of a prison policy of double-bunking

inmates who are on DD/extended lock-down. 
No. 05-30286

-2-

 Seaberry fails to meet the showing required to avoid

application of the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

See Banos v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884-85 (5th Cir. 1998). His

motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the district court

properly applied 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Seaberry’s appeal is

without merit and is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d

215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

 IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### § 914.25 Approval of Indiana abandoned mine land reclamation plan amendments.

The following is a list of the dates amendments were submitted to OSM, the dates when the Director's decision approving all, or portions of these amendments, were published in the Federal Register and the State citations or a brief description of each amendment. The amendments in this table are listed in order of the date of final publication in the Federal Register.

| Original amendment submission date | Date of final publication | Citation/description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| January 22, 1988 | November 29, 1988 | Project selection reclamation coordination, land acquisition, rights of entry, lien consideration, public participation, procurement, accounting systems, endangered and threatened species listing, revised administrative and management structure of the plan. |
| December 6, 1991 | May 11 and October 6, 1992 | Revisions to the Indiana State Reclamation Plan corresponding to 30 CFR 884.13(c)(1), (2), (3), (5), (7), (d)(1), (e)(1), (2), (f)(1). |
| November 17, 1992 | October 26, 1994 | Emergency response reclamation program. |
| July 23, 1997 | March 16, 1998 | Indiana plan §§ 884.13(c)(2) through (7), (d)(1) through (3), (f)(2), (3); emergency response reclamation program. |
| June 2, 2004 | September 14, 2004 | IC 14-34-19-15. |
| March 14, 2016 | September 22, 2017 | Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan for the State of Indiana. |

[62 FR 9940, Mar. 5, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 12652, Mar. 16, 1998; 69 FR 55352, Sept. 14, 2004; 69 FR 69287, Nov. 29, 2004; 82 FR 44317, Sept. 22, 2017]
#### Murray Goodman, Respondent, v. Economy Processing Corp. et al., Appellants.

In an action based on alleged fraud and deceit, the defendants other than Beatrice Robertelli appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 22, 1960, denying their motion to dismiss for insufficiency each cause of action in the complaint insofar as the cause relates to them, respectively; and defendant Beatrice Robertelli appeals from an order of said court, dated March 15, 1960, denying her motion to dismiss for insufficiency each cause of action in the complaint insofar as the cause relates to her (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). Orders reversed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements, and motions granted, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within 30 days after the entry of the order hereon. In our opinion, every cause of action pleaded in the present complaint is insufficient. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Russell Robinson, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, imposed May 31, 1977, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, on his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment not to exceed 10 years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the maximum period of imprisonment to three years. As so modified, sentence affirmed. Before sentence was imposed the court stated: "this probation report is one of the most favorable I have received on any defendant who appeared before me. You must understand, Mr. Robinson, that it always disturbs a court tremendously to have a man of your intelligence and your background appear before me. However, the Court can’t ignore the fact that a life was taken here, and this charge has been reduced to a manslaughter charge. Mr. Insero [defendant’s counsel] properly stated and the record will show that this dispute arose over a small sum of money; that the victim here, Mr. Williams was the driver of a taxi; and by virture of that dispute with you, he punched you repeatedly—he was the aggressor—he punched you repeatedly in the face. Then, that you, in order to protect yourself, apparently lost control of yourself and you stabbed him not *904once but several times with a knife. The record will indicate here that you have a great deal of remorse. I am sure you have. The record shows that you have a high school education; you had a scholarship for basketball; you have spent time at Westchester Community College, you have done apparently a year and a half of college credits here.” Defendant, age 25, has been incarcerated since the date of the incident. Prior to the instant case he had an unblemished record. In support of his application for a reduction in sentence, defendant has submitted an 18-page letter setting forth constructive plans for the future when he is released from prison. He states that while incarcerated he has continued his education and has completed more than one year in printing school. Additionally, the defendant is currently spending one half of each day attending classes preparatory for his return to college and the other half of each day attending wood-finishing class. Having examined the defendant’s plea minutes, sentence minutes and probation report, we agree with the statements made by the sentencing Judge. Accordingly, under all the facts and circumstances here disclosed, we conclude that the sentence imposed was excessive and that this is a proper case for us to exercise our discretion by reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of imprisonment not to exceed three years. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hickory Tech Corporation(HickoryTech) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,John E. Duffy, Chief Executive Officer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.

 

 
| /s/ John E. Duffy                                          |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John E. Duffy  Chief Executive Officer  March 3, 2005 |

 

----
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Hickory Tech Corporation (HickoryTech) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Christensen, Chief Financial Officerof HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofHickoryTech.

 

 
| /s/ David A.  Christensen |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| David A.  Christensen     |
| Chief  Financial Officer  |
| February 27,  2004        |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 117 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 117

    Affirming that Social Security is one of the primary pillars of 
   retirement support for millions of older Americans, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

 Ms. Van Duyne (for herself, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Wittman, Mrs. Miller of 
 West Virginia, Mr. Moolenaar, Ms. Greene of Georgia, Mr. Mills, Mrs. 
 Lesko, Mr. McCormick, Mrs. McClain, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Donalds, and Mr. 
    Jackson of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Affirming that Social Security is one of the primary pillars of 
   retirement support for millions of older Americans, and for other 
                               purposes.

Whereas the Social Security Administration was established by the Social 
        Security Act of 1935;
Whereas Social Security pays cash benefits to more than 65 million people per 
        month;
Whereas benefits are expected to be paid in full on a timely basis only until 
        2033;
Whereas, the reserves for Social Security's Retirement and Survivors benefit 
        program may become exhausted as soon as 2033, and benefits are expected 
        to be paid out at only 77 percent;
Whereas, due to President Biden and his administration, inflation has risen 13.9 
        percent across the country since he has taken the oath of office;
Whereas sky rocketing costs are even worse as prices have outpaced seniors' 
        fixed incomes, causing this year's Social Security benefits to have the 
        highest automatic increase in 40 years, further exacerbating the strain 
        on the Social Security trust fund; and
Whereas it is the sense of the House of Representatives that its commitment to 
        the United States is to save and strengthen Social Security: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives affirms that current 
retirees and those nearing retirement expect certain Social Security 
commitments to be made, as Social Security has been one of the primary 
pillars of retirement support for millions of older Americans for the 
past eight decades and it is not the policy of the House of 
Representatives to cut Social Security as part of debt ceiling 
negotiations.
                                 <all>
```