CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management D istrict

Rule No(s): 1130 & 1128 Date adopted/Amended/Resc inded: Rule 1130 Amended and Rule 1128 Rescinded

November 19, 2013

Rule Title(s): Rule 1130 - Graphic Arts & Rule 112 8 - Paper, Fabric, and Film Coating Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: January 7, 2014

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 1130 - 3/8/96, 1128 - 3/8/96

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Tracy Walters Phone Number: (7 60) 245-1661 x6122 E-mail Address: twalters@mdaqm d.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The proposed amendment of Rule 1130 – Graphic Arts satisfies the provisions of former Health & Safety (H&S) Code §39614(d) which required the adoption of readi ly available, feasible and cost-effective control m easures for particulate matter, and also satisfies 42 U.S.C. §§ 7511a (Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) §182) which req uires that ozone nonattainment areas implement Reasonably Avai lable Control Technology (RACT) for sources that ar e subject to Control Technology Guidelines (CTGs) for major sources of ozone. This rule amendment incor porates the provisions of Rule 1128 into the amended versio n of Rule 1130, as the basis for the rules are simi lar and many redundancies exist. Rule 1128 was rescinded.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 (CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when imp lemented, will result in quantifiable changes in em issions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s )

and other information. Attach calculation sheet sh owing how the emission information provided below w as determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Sourc e Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissio ns: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measu re: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluati on Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emis sion forecasting and
planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Source s Affected by this Amendment: 3

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Cont inuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) C of the Ru le.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Re ductions are: Emission control system, application methods, work practices, AECP,

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): (C) Work Practic e Standards in Section(s): (C)(11) Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (E) Rep orting Requirements in Section(s): (E)5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: The proposed amendments to Rule 1130 – Graphic Arts and the rescission of Rule 1128 – Pap er, Fabric and Film Coating Operations does not cause the release of additional air contaminants, or create any adver se environmental impacts because the amended rule proposes combining the provisions of both rules, a more stringent app licability, as well as, more stringent VOC limits for all categories, i ncluding solvent cleaning operations, than the exis ting rule.