alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Pieter A. Van der Vorst, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sybase, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 14, 2004

                                         /s/ PIETER A. VAN DER VORST
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                           Pieter A. Van der Vorst
                              Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### §403x. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403x, comprising section 2 of the Central Intelligence Agency Voluntary Separation Pay Act, Pub. L. 103–36, was editorially reclassified as section 3519a of this title.
The Home of Michigan State University 

February 10, 2012 

/PARTIv^ENiOF 

,,,,Kivi OPERATION; 

'••\l ;-[[^ ! b P 1- ^^' 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

West Building, Grand Floor 

Room W-120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

410 Abbott Road 

East Unsing, Ml 48823 

(517)337-1731 

Fax (517)337-1559 

vvww.cityofeastlansing.com 

On behalf of the City of East Lansing, I am writing to convey deep concern regarding the potential 

suspension of Sun Country Airline's Capital City Airport non-stop flights to Washington, DC. It has 

come to my attention that Sun Country may lose access to the slots it now utilizes at the Reagan 

International Airport, as the result of a U.S. Court of Appeals decision. It is also my understanding 

that the Department of Transportation has the discretion to authorize additional slots under an 

exemption rule and that Sun Country is pursuing this very option. 

As you wilt note from the attached letter, in 2010 the City of East Lansing expressed strong support 

for the restoration of this vital service to the Mid-Michigan region. Thankfully, the twice-daily 

flights resumed in April of 2011 representing valuable access to the Greater Lansing Area and to 

Washington, DC. Our continued support is unwavering. 

Great things are happening in Mid-Michigan. This area is experiencing a steady renaissance that 

reflects an entrepreneur-friendly business climate. Michigan State University (MSU) is on the eve 

of opening the Eli and Edythe Broad Museum which will attract international visitors to the region. 

Likewise, MSU continues to grow its global reputation as a world class institution and of course, 

Lansing proudly serves as the State Capital of Michigan. 

..The.value.of continuing.this.service to our region-cannot.be overstated,.nor-can-Sun-Country's 

commitment to providing it. As the attached letter states, access to direct travel between MidMichigan and Washington, DC benefits multiple sectors of our region including business, 

government, non-profit, education and culture. The economy of our region and our great state 

continues to rebound slowly but steadily and every available tool is needed to continue on this 

positive path. I therefore strongly and enthusiastically urge the DOT to grant Sun Country the 

exemption to provide landing accommodations in Washington, DC and would be pleased to 

respond to any questions you have regarding this letter. 

Sincerely,. 

h\om^'^ 

Diane Goddeeris 

Mayor 

George l^hanas 

City Manager
### §584. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 104–320, §10(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3873.)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-06859, No. 333-32555, No.333-62917, No. 333-81787, No. 333-31304, No. 333-37216, No. 333-41688, No.333-47722, No. 333-54384, No. 333-56776, No. 333-61682,No. 333-87382, No. 333-105296, No. 333-115658, No. 333-125904, No.333-153025, No. 333-141007) and Form S-3 No. 333-44746 of Altera Corporation of our report dated February 23, 2009 relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California 

February 25, 2009
### §11703. Enforcement by the Attorney General

(a) The Attorney General may, and on request of the Board shall, bring court proceedings to enforce this part, or a regulation or order of the Board or certificate issued under this part, and to prosecute a person violating this part or a regulation or order of the Board or certificate issued under this part.

(b) The United States Government may bring a civil action on behalf of a person to compel a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part to provide that transportation to that person in compliance with this part at the same rate charged, or on conditions as favorable as those given by the rail carrier, for like traffic under similar conditions to another person.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 845.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 11703, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1450, related to authority of Attorney General and United States Government to bring civil actions to enforce this subtitle, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a). See sections 11703, 14703, and 15903 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

                              EAC INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X



The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  financial statements for the three months ended April 30, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.


</LEGEND>


<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  jan-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       apr-30-1999
<CASH>                                             596,761
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      208,928
<ALLOWANCES>                                       20,000
<INVENTORY>                                        87,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   987,484
<PP&E>                                             392,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                     172,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,490,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              390,137
<BONDS>                                            251,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           289,282
<OTHER-SE>                                         559,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1,490,895
<SALES>                                            346,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   346,533
<CGS>                                              238,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      238,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (35,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (35,438)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     205,482
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                       170,044
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.06



</TABLE>
#### § 2400.32 Transmittal of classified information.

The transmittal of classified information outside of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall be in accordance with procedures of § 2001.44 of Directive No. 1. The Security Officer shall be responsible for resolving any questions relative to such transmittal.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-2134

JUSTIN K. HOLDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARK DUVALL THOMAS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:23-cv-01874-GLR)

Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 26, 2024

Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Justin K. Holder, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2134 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Justin Holder appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint for 

lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. 

Holder v. Thomas, No. 1:23-cv-01874-GLR (D. Md. July 27, 2023; Sept. 27, 2023). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2134 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Rogers, Chief
Executive Officer of Duke Energy Carolinas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Carolinas.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    JAMES E. ROGERS 
|James E. Rogers        
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 13, 2007
#### § 1642.2 The claim for classification in Class 3-A.

A claim for classification in Class 3-A must be made by the registrant in writing. Prior to the consideration of the claim, the registrant shall submit supporting documentation, such documents being placed in his file folder.
Exhibit 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Sbarro, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended  December 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Anthony J. Puglisi,
Vice President-Chief  Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  March 29, 2004


/s/ Anthony J. Puglisi
----------------------
Anthony J. Puglisi,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

NOTE: A signed original of this  certification  has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2008209EN.01004102.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/41

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 July 2008 — Lafarge v Commission

(Case T-54/03) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Plasterboard market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Liability - Deterrence - Repeat infringement - Fine - Guidelines on the method of setting fines)

(2008/C 209/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Lafarge SA (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Lesguillons, J.-C. Bermond, N. Jalabert-Doury, A. Winckler, F. Brunet and I. Simic initially, then by N. Jalabert-Doury, A. Winckler and F. Brunet, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and C. Ingen-Housz initially, then by F. Castillo de la Torre and F. Arbault, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Marquardt and E. Karlsson, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2005/471/EC of 27 November 2002 relating to proceedings under Article 81 [EC] against BPB plc, Gebrüder Knauf Westdeutsche Gipswerke KG, Société Lafarge SA and Gyproc Benelux NV (Case No COMP/E-1/37.152 — Plasterboard) (OJ 2005 L 166, p. 8), or, in the alternative, an application for the annulment of or a reduction in the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Lafarge SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lafarge SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Council to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 26.4.2003.

1

---
2004 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

12-13-2004

Southco Inc v. Kanebridge Corp

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 02-1243

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Southco Inc v. Kanebridge Corp" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 21.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/21
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 02-1243

SOUTHCO, INC.,

 

 Appellant

 

v.

 

KANEBRIDGE CORP.

 

_________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

District Court Judge: Honorable Norma L. Shapiro

(D.C. No. 99-cv-4337)

____________________

Argued: December 3, 2002

Reargued En Banc: October 8, 2003

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, McKEE,

RENDELL, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, CHERTOFF, and BECKER,

Circuit Judges

(Opinion Filed: December 3, 2004)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The concurring opinion in the above case is hereby amended as follows:
On the first line, delete “Part II” and replace it with “Parts I and II”.

:

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Edward R. Becker 

Circuit Judge

DATED: December 13, 2004
#### § 922.846 Individual civil penalties.

Part 846 of this chapter, *Individual Civil Penalties,* shall apply to the assessment of individual civil penalties under section 518(f) of the Act.

[53 FR 3676, Feb. 8, 1988]
#### Anthony Spadanuta et al., Appellants, v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre et al., Respondents.

Motion by respondents to dismiss for lack of prosecution the pending appeal from an order, dated November 14, 1961, denying appellants’ motion for a temporary injunction, and cross motion by appellants to enlarge time to perfect the appeal. In view of our decision made herewith in a companion appeal *(Spadanuta*v. *Incorporated Vil. of Rockville Centre,*16 A D 2d 966), in which we reversed an order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action and granted such motion, the motion to dismiss is granted; appeal dismissed; cross motion denied. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         DIAPULSE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                                   FORM 10-QSB
                   FOR THE QUARTER PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Item 7.  Certifications

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 C.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diapulse, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 C.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


         By:      /s Jesse Ross                  August 2, 2004
                  ------------------------
                  Jesse Ross
                  Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FIRST QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1997
<CASH>                                          64,138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  187,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                       229
<INVENTORY>                                        873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               267,537
<PP&E>                                          37,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 414,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           386
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,672)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   414,412
<SALES>                                        271,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,137
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  259,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,286
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,311
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,311
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        


</TABLE>