alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,760
<PP&E>                                          51,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,813
<BONDS>                                         22,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           873
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,377
<SALES>                                         46,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,549
<CGS>                                           39,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,037
<INCOME-TAX>                                       855
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNASIL CORPORATION
OF AMERICA (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We, Craig T
Dunham, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Company and
Laura Lunardo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and result of operations of The Company.



                                    /s/ Craig T Dunham
                                   -------------------
                                   Craig T Dunham
                                   President and Chief Executive
                                   Officer


                                   /s/ Laura Lunardo
                                   -------------------
                                   Laura Lunardo
                                   Chief Financial Officer

February 14, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           5,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,270)
<INVENTORY>                                     46,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,447
<PP&E>                                          92,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                (66,096)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,356
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   186,079
<SALES>                                        182,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303,258
<CGS>                                          127,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,903
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,577)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,658)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (422)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,659
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.2


                                 April 9, 2002


The Board of Directors
Techdyne, Inc.


         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
on Form S-3 (No. 33-81270) of Techdyne, Inc. of our report dated March 9, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Techdyne, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2000, and the consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2000 and 1999. This report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on
Form 10-K of Techdyne, Inc.


                                                     Wiss & Company
### §5755. Supervisory differentials

(a)(1) The Office of Personnel Management may authorize the head of an agency to pay a differential to an employee under the General Schedule who has supervisory responsibility for 1 or more employees not under the General Schedule, if 1 or more of the subordinate employees would, in the absence of such a differential, be paid more than the supervisory employee.

(2) For the purposes of comparing the pay of a supervisory employee under the General Schedule with the pay of a subordinate employee not under the General Schedule, comparability payments under section 5304, differentials, and allowances that are not a part of basic pay may be taken into consideration, as provided by regulations of the Office.

(b)(1) A supervisory differential, which shall be stated as a percentage of the supervisory employee's rate of basic pay (excluding any comparability payments under section 5304) or as a dollar amount, may not cause the supervisory employee's pay to exceed the pay of the highest paid subordinate employee by more than 3 percent.

(2) A supervisory differential may not be considered to be part of the basic pay of an employee, and the reduction or elimination of a supervisory differential may not be appealed. The preceding sentence shall not be construed to extinguish or lessen any right or remedy under subchapter II of chapter 12 or under any of the laws referred to in section 2302(d).

(3) A supervisory differential shall be paid in the same manner and at the same time as the employee's basic pay is paid.

(c) For the purpose of this section—

(1) the terms "agency" and "employee" have the meanings given them by section 5102; and

(2) any reference to "an employee under the General Schedule" shall be considered to be a reference to any employee holding a position to which subchapter III of chapter 53 applies.

(d) The Office shall prescribe such regulations as it considers necessary for the administration of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 101–509, title V, §529 [title II, §211(a)], Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1427, 1461; amended Pub. L. 115–73, title I, §107(a)(2)(B), Oct. 26, 2017, 131 Stat. 1239; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1097(b)(3)(B), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1617.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Schedule, referred to in subsecs. (a)(1), (2) and (c)(2), is set out under section 5332 of this title.

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 115–91 substituted "section 2302(d)" for "section 2302(c)".

Pub. L. 115–73 substituted "section 2302(c)" for "section 2302(d)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on such date as the President shall determine, but not earlier than 90 days, and not later than 180 days, after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 529 [title III, §305] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 5301 of this title.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the Company and itssubsidiaries. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Kenneth A. Joyce                       |   | /s/ Duane L. Sinn                                             |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Kenneth      A. Joyce,                     |   | Duane      L. Sinn                                            |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive      Vice President and ChiefFinancial      Officer |
|                                       |   |                                                          |
| Dated:  March      19, 2009      |   | Dated:  March      19, 2009                         |

| * | This      certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and      shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act      or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.  This      certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any      filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,      except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference      in such filing. |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>         0000031364
<NAME>        Eckerd Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                              54,254
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      144,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,000
<INVENTORY>                                      1,234,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,435,667
<PP&E>                                           1,032,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                     415,973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,881,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              736,995
<BONDS>                                          1,662,859
<COMMON>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         336,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,881,334
<SALES>                                          3,375,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,375,440
<CGS>                                            2,616,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,616,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   600,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2,119
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    111,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42,499
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 69,339
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        69,339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 2400.19 Declassification by the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office.

If the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) determines that information is classified in violation of Executive Order 12356, the Director, ISOO may require the information to be declassified by the agency that originated the classification. Any such decision by the Director ISOO may be appealed by the Director, OSTP to the National Security Council. The information shall remain classified, pending a prompt decision on the appeal.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*Albert E. Moreli, Jr., and Frank J. De Masi, Respondents.

Third Department,

December 2, 1960.

*Morris Marshall Cohn, District Attorney,*for appellant.

*Louis Lombardi*for Frank J. De Masi, respondent.

*Gordon, Gordon & Siegel (Arnold M. Gordon*and *Robert Siegel*of counsel), for Albert E. Moreli, Jr., respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The People appeal from orders which granted defendants’ separate motions for inspection of the minutes of the Grand Jury which found a joint indictment for violations of section 970 of the Penal Law — the common gambler statute. These appeals were heard with the article 78 proceeding *People ex rel. Cohn*v. *County Court of Schenectady County,*decided herewith (11 A D 2d 438), in which the District Attorney sought relief in the nature of prohibition against the enforcement of the orders here appealed from.

The orders are not appealable. *(People*v. *Howell,*3 N Y 2d 672, 675.) The District Attorney’s contention to the contrary rests upon the construction he would give to section 518 of the Code of Criminal Procedure providing that, *‘1*An appeal may be taken by the people as of right * ** **5. In all eases where an appeal may be taken by the defendant, except where a verdict or judgment of not guilty has been rendered.” Subdivision 5 (then 4) was added by chapter 337 of the Laws of 1927 and we find no clear indication of its purpose. The only memorandum in the bill jacket is that of the Committee on Criminal Courts Law and Procedure of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York which advanced the opinion that the bill would confer upon the People no additional right. Since *438an appeal may not be taken by the defendant from a denial of inspection *(People*v. *Howell, supra),*clearly subdivision 5 is inapplicable. The District Attorney, however, would equate “ an appeal [which] may be taken by the defendant” to the defendant’s supposed right of review of any order denying inspection, upon an appeal to the Appellate Division from a judgment of conviction; and would thereupon assume an immediate right of appeal in the People co-ordinate with the defendant’s right of review incidental to his appeal from conviction; but he cites no authority sustaining such supposed right of subsequent review in any case in which the question was squarely raised and put directly in issue, and we know of none. (See *People*v. *Harrell,*282 App. Div. 1051, 1052, affd: 307 N. Y. 890; and, cf., dissenting opinion in *People*v. *Howell,*3 A D 2d 153, 163-164, affd. 3 N Y 2d 672, *supra.)*

In any event, and considering that ‘ ‘ the appellate jurisdiction of the courts of this state in criminal cases is purely statutory; and * * * can never be assumed, unless a statute can be found which expressly sanctions its exercise ” *(People*v. *Zerillo,*200 N. Y. 443, 446), there seems to us no justification for attributing to subdivision 5 a meaning which its clear language does not support.'

The appeals should be dismissed.

Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Appeals dismissed, without costs.
§ 174.18 Historic preservation. ( a ) The transfer, lease, or sale of National Register-eligible historic property to a non-Federal entity at installations subject to this part may constitute an “adverse effect” under the regulations implementing the National Historic Preservation Act (36 CFR 800.5(a)(2)(vii)). One way of resolving this adverse effect is to restrict the use that may be made of the property subsequent to its transfer out of Federal ownership or control through the imposition of legally enforceable restrictions or conditions. The Secretary concerned may include such restrictions or conditions (typically a real property interest in the form of a restrictive covenant or preservation easement) in any deed or lease conveying an interest in historic property to a non-Federal entity. Before doing so, the Secretary should first consider whether the historic character of the property can be protected effectively through planning and zoning actions undertaken by units of State or local government; if so, working with such units of State or local government to protect the property through these means is preferable to encumbering the property with such a covenant or easement.
( b ) Before including such a covenant or easement in a deed or lease, the Secretary concerned shall consider— ( 1 ) Whether the jurisdiction that encompasses the property authorizes such a covenant or easement; and
( 2 ) Whether the Secretary can give or assign to a third party the responsibility for monitoring and enforcing such a covenant or easement.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant  To 18 U.S.C. 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew H. Jacobson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date: June 24, 2009

/s/ Andrew H. Jacobson Andrew H. Jacobson, President and Chief Executive Officer
and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Torrence Langhorne, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 722]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), rendered November 2, 2005, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention regarding the imposition of a sentence which was greater than that originally promised to *565him at the time of his plea of guilty is not preserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v K.F.,*208 AD2d 948 [1994]; *People v Ellis,*162 AD2d 701 [1990]). Mastro, J.P., Ritter, Skelos, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
### §1002. Homeland Security Science and Technology Advisory Committee

The Under Secretary for Science and Technology shall utilize the Homeland Security Science and Technology Advisory Committee, as appropriate, to provide outside expertise in advancing cargo security technology.

(Pub. L. 109–347, title III, §302(c), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1921.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                    13,205
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            177,096
<ALLOWANCES>                             (37,486)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         197,806
<PP&E>                                    22,692
<DEPRECIATION>                           (15,439)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,546,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    372,968
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                  13,709
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                               573,019
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,546,301
<SALES>                                  623,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         823,358
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            729,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           93,981
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       93,981
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              93,981
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
#### CRENSHAW, Respondent, v. BURKE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 22, 1903.)

Action by May V. Crenshaw against Bernard J. Burke.

No opinion. Jugdment reversed on consent of the parties, and new trial granted; costs to the appellant to abide the event.
#### Frank Chisholm et al. v. Bernard R. Lieberman, as Receiver. Leoanzo Simmons v. Bernard R. Lieberman, as Receiver. Jonah Mitchell v. Bernard R. Lieberman, as Receiver.

Application denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, J J.