alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2002.38 Waivers of CUI requirements. ( a ) *Limited CUI marking waivers within the agency.* When an agency designates information as CUI but determines that marking it as CUI is excessively burdensome, an agency's CUI SAO may approve waivers of all or some of the CUI marking requirements while that CUI remains within agency control.
( b ) *Limited legacy material marking waivers within the agency.* ( 1 ) In situations in which the agency has a substantial amount of stored information with legacy markings, and removing legacy markings and designating or re-marking it as CUI would be excessively burdensome, the agency's CUI SAO may approve a waiver of these requirements for some or all of that information while it remains under agency control.
( 2 ) When an authorized holder re-uses any legacy information or information derived from legacy documents that qualifies as CUI, they must remove or redact legacy markings and designate or re-mark the information as CUI, even if the information is under a legacy material marking waiver prior to re-use.
( c ) *Exigent circumstances waivers.* ( 1 ) In exigent circumstances, the agency head or the CUI SAO may waive the provisions and requirements established in this part or the CUI Registry for any CUI while it is within the agency's possession or control, unless specifically prohibited by applicable laws, regulations, or Government-wide policies.
( 2 ) Exigent circumstances waivers may apply when an agency shares the information with other agencies or non-Federal entities. In such cases, the authorized holders must make recipients aware of the CUI status of any disseminated information.
( d ) *For all waivers.* ( 1 ) The CUI SAO must still ensure that the agency appropriately safeguards and disseminates the CUI. See § 2002.20(a)(7);
( 2 ) The CUI SAO must detail in each waiver the alternate protection methods the agency will employ to ensure protection of CUI subject to the waiver;
( 3 ) All marking waivers apply to CUI subject to the waiver only while that agency continues to possess that CUI. No marking waiver may accompany CUI when an authorized holder disseminates it outside that agency;
( 4 ) Authorized holders must uniformly and conspicuously apply CUI markings to all CUI prior to disseminating it outside the agency unless otherwise specifically permitted by the CUI EA; and
( 5 ) When the circumstances requiring the waiver end, the CUI SAO must reinstitute the requirements for all CUI subject to the waiver without delay.
( e ) The CUI SAO must: ( 1 ) Retain a record of each waiver;
( 2 ) Include a description of all current waivers and waivers issued during the preceding year in the annual report to the CUI EA, along with the rationale for each waiver and the alternate steps the agency takes to ensure sufficient protection of CUI; and
( 3 ) Notify authorized recipients and the public of these waivers.
#### § 21.550 Must DoD Components relate reported actions to listings in the CFDA?

Yes, DoD Components' central points must report each action as an obligation or deobligation under a specific programmatic listing in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA, see § 21.505). The programmatic listing to be shown is the one that provided the funds being obligated or deobligated. For example, if a grants officer or agreements officer in one DoD Component obligates appropriations of a second DoD Component's programmatic listing, the grants officer or agreements officer must show the CFDA programmatic listing of the second DoD Component on the DD Form 2566.
### §9901. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) the term "Director" means the Director of the Office of Personnel Management; and

(2) the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title XI, §1101(a)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1621.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Impact on Department of Defense Civilian Personnel

Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title XI, §1101(b), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1633, provided that:

"(1) Any exercise of authority under chapter 99 of such title [this chapter] (as added by subsection (a)), including under any system established under such chapter, shall be in conformance with the requirements of this subsection.

"(2) No other provision of this Act [see Tables for classification] or of any amendment made by this Act may be construed or applied in a manner so as to limit, supersede, or otherwise affect the provisions of this section [enacting this chapter], except to the extent that it does so by specific reference to this section."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, Section 309 and the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations, Section 107.1900 (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 03/03-0242 issued to NewSpring Mezzanine Capital, L.P., said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

Thomas Morris,

Acting Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2020-28938 Filed 12-30-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2009090EN.01003801.xml

| 18.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/38

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 March 2009 — Bouma and Others v Council and Commission

(Case T-533/93) (1)

1

2009/C 90/58

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed in part from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 334, 9.12.1993.

1

---
M. P. No. 77-101.

#### William H. Cheetham, Estate of.

*Francis J. Maguire,*for petitioner.

The petition for certiorari is denied.

The petitioner’s motions to file in forma pauperis and for cost of transcript, to consolidate, and to stay proceedings in probate court, are denied.
# FORM
6-K

SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

# Report of
Foreign Issuer

# Pursuant to
Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of

# Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

For the month
of February 2005

ABBEY NATIONAL
PLC (Translation of registrant's name into English)

Abbey National
House, 2 Triton Square, Regent's PlaceLondon NW1 3AN, England
   (Address of principal executive offices)

|Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
      under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . . Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
      contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
      Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934.  Yes . . . . . . . No . . .X. .
.. .


---



Abbey Board Changes




Further to the announcement on the 22nd December 2004 Abbey confirms that the appointment of Graeme Hardie as Executive Director, Sales and Marketing will be effective from 22nd February 2005. FSA approval has been received and was effective from 24th January 2005.



Abbey has also appointed Nathan Bostock as Executive Director, Finance & Markets with effect from 22nd February 2005. FSA approval has been received and was effective from 8th February 2005.





Media enquiries:
Matthew Young, Abbey Media Relations             Tel: 020 775 64232
Christina Mills, Abbey Media Relations             Tel: 020 775 64212





---

# SIGNATURES

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.

|                                       |  | **ABBEY NATIONAL
      PLC**          
|-------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|**Date:


    **22nd February 2005**** |  | **By: /s/





    **Jason Wright**** 
|                                       |  | **(Authorised Signatory)**************
#### Walter Zimmerman, appellee, v. Jake Goldstein and A. Becker, appellants.

Gen. No. 29,297.

Action on promissory notes. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Asa G. Adams, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

*651Edward E. Contarsy, for appellants.

Samuel L. Cohen, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §20942. Duties

The Standards Board and the Board of Advisors shall each, in accordance with the procedures described in subpart 3 of this part, review the voluntary voting system guidelines under such subpart, the voluntary guidance under subchapter III, and the best practices recommendations contained in the report submitted under section 20982(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title II, §212, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subchapter III, referred to in text, was in the original "title III", meaning title III of Pub. L. 107–252, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1704, which is classified principally to subchapter III (§21081 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15342 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**PursuantTo 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned certifies that:

 

1)             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

 

2)             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   June 23, 2011 | /s/ Brent D. Bailey                                                                                                               |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Brent D. Bailey,*President and Chief Executive Officer   and Director*                                                            |
|                       |                                                                                                                              |
|                       |                                                                                                                              |
| Date:   June 23, 2011 | /s/ Deanna L. Spooner                                                                                                             |
|                       | Deanna L. Spooner*Vice President—Finance &   Administration and CFO   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Aquatic habitats in relation toriver flow in the Apalachicola River floodplain, Florida**
 
Report | Plates: OneTwoThree
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1594
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:
 
May 7, 2018
#### Mildred Frankel et al., Respondents, v. Theodore J. Hamm, Appellant.

Order entered on September 20, 1960, striking out the answer of the defendant herein, granting summary judgment to plaintiff, and placing the case on the Ready Day Calendar of November 15, 1960 for assessment of damages, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion for summary judgment denied, with $10 costs, on the ground that there are issues of fact which must be determined upon a trial. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
§ 937.843 Federal enforcement. ( a ) Part 843 of this chapter, *Federal Enforcement,* shall apply when enforcement action is required for violations on surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) OSM will furnish a copy of each enforcement action document and order to show cause issued pursuant to this subpart to the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Maintenance-Of-Membership Awards of National War Labor Board

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	United States. National War Labor Board (1942-1945). 						*Maintenance-Of-Membership Awards of National War Labor Board : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 753*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1943,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4238,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  North  American  Gaming   and
Entertainment  Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2007  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I E. H. Hawes II, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)    The Report fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)    The information contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ E. H. HAWES, II,
--------------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

November 14, 2007
#### HORWITZ v. REINERT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Appeal—Affirmance.

W'here the judgment for plaintiff must be affirmed, and in fact has been satisfied, an order vacating the order approving the undertaking on appeal, whether proper or not, will be left undisturbed on appeal therefrom, without costs.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.

Action by Isaac Horwitz against Ferdinand Reinert. From an order setting aside a stay of execution and an order denying defendant’s motion to resettle the same in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

James E. Smith, for appellant.

Nathaniel Levy, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

On February 25th notice of appeal in an action entitled above, and copy of an undertaking dated February 21, 1903, were served. On March 2d notice of exceptions to the form and sufficiency was served. On March 6th notice of justification, first for March nth and then for March 9th, and in each case returned as not within the time provided by the statute. On. March 9th the undertaking was approved, but subsequently it was vacated by the same justice on an order to show cause. This was seemingly proper, under section 315 of the municipal court act (Laws 1902, p. 1580, c. 580). Whether so or not, however, as the judgment itself must be affirmed, and has in fact been satisfied, as stated in his brief by counsel for plaintiff, the orders above mentioned may be left undisturbed, without costs to either party.

Orders affirmed, without costs to either party.
#### WEIR et al. v. BARKER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department,

March 10, 1905.)

Action by John R. Weir and *1150Frederick Weir, copartners, etc., against Frances E. Barker, trustee, etc. No opinion. Motion granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          4,095
<SECURITIES>                    9,544
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                13,639
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  21,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,937,601
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        2,899
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,919,239)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    21,261
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                (9,453)
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                598,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (608,176)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (541,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1,149,176)
<DISCONTINUED>                  (922,466)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (2,071,642)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.07)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan F. Krock hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report of PMC on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.





|                    |  |     |  |                                                         
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 1, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Alan F. Krock                                       
|                    |  |     |  | Alan F. Krock                                           
|                    |  |     |  | Vice President                                          
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-22877, No. 33-37159, No. 33-57350, No. 33-61085, No. 333-06859, No. 333-32555, No. 333-62917, No. 333-81787, No. 333-31304, No. 333-37216, No. 333-41688, No. 333-47722, No. 333-54384, No. 333-56776, No.333-61682, No. 333-87382, No. 333-105296, No. 333-115658, No. 333-125904) and Form S-3 No. 333-44746 of Altera Corporation of our report dated February 25, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

February 25, 2008