alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9918 

To exclude from gross income certain relief payments to the victims of 

the Chiquita Canyon elevated temperature landfill event. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2024 

Mr. MIKE GARCIA of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To exclude from gross income certain relief payments to 

the victims of the Chiquita Canyon elevated temperature 

landfill event. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chiquita Canyon Tax 

5 Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHIQUITA CANYON DISASTER RELIEF PAYMENTS. 

7 (a) DISASTER RELIEF PAYMENTS TO VICTIMS OF

8 CHIQUITA CANYON ELEVATED TEMPERATURE LANDFILL

9 EVENT.—Chiquita Canyon elevated temperature landfill 

10 event payments shall be treated as qualified disaster relief 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9918 IH

1 payments for purposes of section 139(b) of the Internal 

2 Revenue Code of 1986. 

3 (b) CHIQUITA CANYON ELEVATED TEMPERATURE

4 LANDFILL EVENT PAYMENTS.—For purposes of this sec5 tion, the term ‘‘Chiquita Canyon elevated temperature 

6 landfill event payments’’ means any amount received by 

7 or on behalf of an individual as compensation for loss, 

8 damages, expenses, relocation, suffering, loss in real prop9 erty value, closing costs with respect to real property (in10 cluding realtor commissions), or inconvenience (including 

11 access to real property) resulting from the Chiquita Can12 yon elevated temperature landfill event if such amount was 

13 provided by— 

14 (1) a Federal, State, or local government agen15 cy, 

16 (2) Waste Connections, Inc., or 

17 (3) any subsidiary, insurer, or agent of Waste 

18 Connections, Inc. or any related person. 

19 (c) ELEVATED TEMPERATURE LANDFILL EVENT.— 

20 For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘Chiquita Canyon 

21 elevated temperature landfill event’’ means the elevated 

22 temperature landfill event occurring beneath the Chiquita 

23 Canyon Landfill in Los Angeles County, California, begin24 ning on May 1, 2022. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9918 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply to 

2 amounts received on or after March 1, 2024. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
§ 917.17 State regulatory program amendments not approved. ( a ) The amendment to Kentucky's regulations at 405 KAR 16:060 Section 8(4)(c); 18:060 Section 12(4)(c) and 18:210 Section 3(5)(c) which were originally submitted by Kentucky on July 30, 1997 and later amended are disapproved.
( b ) The amendment at Kentucky Revised Statute 350.060(22) submitted by Kentucky on May 26, 1982, and the legal opinion (insofar as it relates to this amendment) and Reclamation Advisory Memorandum No. 33 submitted by Kentucky on October 28, 1983, are hereby disapproved effective September 17, 1985.
( c ) The amendment to Kentucky's program transferring $3,840,000 from the Kentucky Bond Pool Fund to the Commonwealth's General Fund for the 2002-2003 fiscal year is not approved.
( d ) The addition of the word “abated” to modify the term “violation” in paragraph (4)(a) of section 3 of Chapter 7:090 of Title 405 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations, as submitted to OSMRE by letter dated April 27, 1988, is hereby disapproved. The effect of the disapproval is to continue the requirement that any person who chooses not to contest the fact of violation (whether abated or not) or the assessment shall pay the assessment in full within 30 days of the date the final assessment order was mailed.
( e ) We are not approving the following provision of the proposed Kentucky program amendments dated November 25, 2019: KAR Chapter 10:001 Section 1, Subsection 26—Definition of “Long term treatment”.
[49 FR 50720, Dec. 31, 1984, as amended at 50 FR 37659, Sept. 17, 1985; 51 FR 29919, Aug. 21, 1986; 53 FR 39261, Oct. 6, 1988; 53 FR 39473, Oct. 7, 1988; 63 FR 40827, July 31, 1998; 69 FR 26503, May 13, 2004; 69 FR 48787, Aug. 11, 2004; 70 FR 11123, Mar. 8, 2005; 88 FR 65129, Sept. 21, 2023]
# C_2009180EN.01004001.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/40

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 June 2009 — ASM Brescia v Commission

(Case T-189/03) (1)

1

(State aid - Scheme of aid granted by the Italian authorities to certain public utilities in the form of tax exemptions and loans at preferential rates - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Actions for annulment - Individual concern - Admissibility - Article 87(3)(c) EC - Article 86(2) EC)

2009/C 180/72

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ASM Brescia SpA (Brescia, Italy) (represented by: F. Capelli, F. Vitale and M. Valcada, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 2003/193/EC of 5 June 2002 on State aid granted by Italy in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding (OJ 2003 L 77, p. 21).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ASM Brescia SpA to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ASM Brescia SpA to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 2.8.2003.

1

---
Reported Emissions and Product Content 

Table 1. Reported Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from U.S. Operations 

Company Fifth Year 

Reductions 

Chemical 

Category 

Emissions Product Content 

Releases to all 

media from FP 

and Telomer 

Manufacturing

(kg)

kg of 

release / 

kg of 

product 

produced 

Dispersions

(ppm wetweight basis)

Other 

Fluoropolymers

(ppm dry-weight 

basis)

Telomers 

(ppm dryweight basis, 

unless stated 

otherwise)

Dyneon/3M 2010 

PFOA, PFOA 

salts and 

Higher 

Homologues 

0 0 0 0 No Telomer 

Production 

Precursors 0 
Table 2. Reported Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from Non U.S. Operations 

Company Fifth Year 

Reductions 

Chemical 

Category 

Emissions Product Content 

Releases to all 

media from FP 

and Telomer 

Manufacturing 

(kg)

kg of 

release / kg 

of product 

produced 

Dispersions

(ppm wetweight basis)

Other 

Fluoropolymers

(ppm dry-weight 

basis)

Telomers 

(ppm dryweight basis, 

unless stated 

otherwise)

Dyneon/3M 2010 

PFOA, PFOA 

salts and 

Higher 

Homologues 0 

For FP 

Production: 

<1 kg / 100 

kg 

0 3 

No Telomer 

Production 

Precursors 0 
Reported Percent Reductions in Emissions and Product Content 

Table 3. Reported Percent Reductions in Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from

U.S. Operations 

Company Fifth Year 

Reductions 

Chemical 

Category 

% Reduction in 

Emissions % Reduction in Product Content 

% Reductions in 

total quantity of 

chemical(s) released 

from baseline year 

Fluoropolymer 

Dispersions 

Other 

Fluoropolymers 

Telomer based 

products 

Dyneon/3M 2010 

PFOA, 

PFOA salts 

and Higher 

Homologues 100% 100% Not Applicable 

No Telomer 

Production 

Precursors No Precursor production 
Table 4. Reported Percent Reductions in Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from 

Non U.S. Operations 

Company Fifth Year 

Reductions 

Chemical 

Category 

% Reduction in 

Emissions % Reduction in Product Content 

% Reductions in total 

quantity of 

chemical(s) released 

from baseline year 

Fluoropolymer 

Dispersions 

Other 

Fluoropolymers 

Telomer based 

products 

Dyneon/3M 2010 

PFOA, 

PFOA salts 

and Higher 

Homologues 100 % 100% 100 % 

No Telomer 

Production 

Precursors No Precursor production
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

**Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Leonard F. Leganza, the Chief Executive Officer of The Eastern Company (the “Company”) and John L. Sullivan III, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

| 1) | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period ended September 29, 2007, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 29th day of October, 2007.

 

|   | /s/ Leonard F. Leganza    |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Leonard F. Leganza

CEO   |
|   |                      |
|   | /s/ John L. Sullivan III  |
|   | John L. Sullivan III

CFO |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Eastern Company and will be retained by The Eastern Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
#### Erie County Board of Social Welfare, Appellant, v. Aloysius Radwan, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation.
#### Harriet Herrick, appellant, v. Robert Herrick, appellee.

Gen. No. 29,563.

Suit for divorce. Petition by defendant for specific performance by trustee under supplemental agreement. Order entered as prayed. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John J. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924. Reversed on opinion in Herrick *v. Herriok,*236 Ill. App. 478.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Montgomery Hart & Smith, for appellant.

John P. Cashen, Jr., for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### William Callahan, Respondent, v Mildred Callahan, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 30, 1977 after a jury verdict, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of directing judgment in favor of the appellant on her first counterclaim in the sum of $13,080, with interest thereon, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The parties’ separation agreement, prepared by respondent’s attorney, sets out the terms regarding the purchase of a $45,000 home for the wife, $15,000 in cash from the wife, $15,000 in cash from the husband to be treated as a loan to the wife, and a $15,000 mortgage to be obtained and paid for by the husband. When the husband stopped making the mortgage payments, the wife undertook to pay them. Later, when she sold the house, she paid off the balance of the mortgage. The husband thereupon commenced an action seeking, so far as is relevant on this appeal, repayment of his loan. She in turn counterclaimed for, among other things, $13,080 the amount she paid to satisfy the balance of the mortgage. The crux of this appeal is whether clause (c) of paragraph Fourth of the separation agreement which reads "The Husband shall obtain a mortgage in the sum of $15,000.00, and agrees to pay same.” is ambiguous, and was therefore for the jury to interpret. The trial court and the jury were persuaded an ambiguity existed apparently because the agreement did not recite what the parties’ obligations were in the event the house was sold. We see nothing in the language of clause (c) of paragraph Fourth, where, incidentally, the phrase "and agrees to pay same” was handwritten and initialed by both parties, for a jury to have ascertained or interpreted. It clearly sets forth an unconditional promise on the husband’s part to obtain and pay a $15,000 mortgage. Plain language of this kind is just not subject to testimony as to "what the parties meant but failed to state.” *(Oxford Commercial Corp. v Landau,*12 NY2d 362, 365; *Goldwater v Goldwater,*63 AD2d 599.) Settle order. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Evans, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.
### §101920. Contracting for services

(a) Contracting Authorized.—

(1) Management elements for which contract required to maximum extent practicable.—To the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall contract with private entities to conduct or assist in elements of the management of the Service concession program considered by the Secretary to be suitable for non-Federal performance. Those management elements shall include each of the following:

(A) Health and safety inspections.

(B) Quality control of concession operations and facilities.

(C) Strategic capital planning for concession facilities.

(D) Analysis of rates and charges to the public.

(2) Management elements for which contract allowed.—The Secretary may also contract with private entities to assist the Secretary with each of the following:

(A) Preparation of the financial aspects of prospectuses for Service concession contracts.

(B) Development of guidelines for a System capital improvement and maintenance program for all concession occupied facilities.

(C) Making recommendations to the Director regarding the conduct of annual audits of concession fee expenditures.

(b) Other Management Elements.—The Secretary shall consider, taking into account the recommendations of the Advisory Board, contracting out other elements of the concessions management program, as appropriate.

(c) Authority of Secretary Not Diminished.—Nothing in this section shall diminish the governmental responsibilities and authority of the Secretary to administer concession contracts and activities pursuant to this subchapter and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of this title. The Secretary reserves the right to make the final decision or contract approval on contracting services dealing with the management of the Service concessions program under this section.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3149.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101920 | 16 U.S.C. 5959. | Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §410, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3514. |

Section
§ 1660.11 Procedures—expert or opinion testimony. In any legal proceeding before the SSS or in which the United States (including any Federal agency or officer of the United States) is a party: ( a ) The SSS GC shall arrange for an employee to testify as a witness for the United States whenever the attorney representing the United States requests it.
( b ) SSS personnel may testify for the United States both as to facts within their personal knowledge and as an expert or opinion witness. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, SSS personnel may not testify as an expert or opinion witness, with regard to any matter arising out of their official duties or the functions of the SSS, for any party other than the United States in any legal proceeding in which the United States is a party. SSS personnel who receive a demand to testify on behalf of a party other than the United States may testify as to facts within the employee's personal knowledge, provided that the testimony be subject to the prior written approval of the SSS GC or other SSS legal advisor and to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable claims of privilege, the anticipated testimony is not adverse to the interests of the SSS or the United States Government, and is presented at no cost to the Government.
( c ) SSS personnel may testify as an expert or opinion witness on behalf of the SSS or in any legal proceeding conducted by the SSS or the United States.
§ 885.16 What responsibilities do I have after OSMRE approves my grant? ( a ) When we award your grant, we send you a written grant agreement stating the terms of the grant.
( b ) After you are awarded a grant, you may assign functions and funds to other Federal, State, or local organizations. However, we will hold you responsible for the overall administration of that grant, including the proper use of funds and reporting.
( c ) The grant award constitutes an obligation of Federal funds. You accept the grant and its conditions once you initiate work under the agreement or draw down awarded funds.
( d ) Although we have approved the grant agreement, you must ensure that any applicable laws, clearances, permits, or requirements are met before you expend funds for projects other than coal reclamation under part 874.
( e ) If you conduct a coal reclamation project under part 874 of this chapter or noncoal reclamation project under part 875 of this chapter, you must not expend any construction funds until you receive a written authorization from us to proceed on an individual project. Our authorization to proceed ensures that both you and we have taken all actions necessary to ensure compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*) and any other applicable laws, clearances, permits, or requirements.
( f ) To the extent technologically and economically feasible, you must use fuel other than petroleum or natural gas for all public facilities that are planned, constructed, or modified in whole or in part with Title IV grant funds.
( g ) You must not expend more funds than we have awarded. Our award of any grant does not commit or obligate the United States to award any continuation grant or to enter into any grant revision, including grant increases to cover cost overruns.
[73 FR 67642, Nov. 14, 2008, as amended at 80 FR 6447, Feb. 5, 2015]
Transport Transports

Canada Canada TP 7245E



# AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your na me. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 593 . Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H , the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidat e the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard

. This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada, Otta wa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address.

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communica tions Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 , or 1-800-305-2059

, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ addr ess.asp

24-0022 (01-2005) 1/1 No

. CF-2005-25

Issue Date 5 July 2005

Number: CF-2005-25

Subject: Power Turbine RPM Steady-State Operation Avoidance

Effective: 8 August 2005

Applicability: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) Model 430 helicopters, serial numbers 49001 through 49111

Compliance: As indicated.

Background: Transport Canada has been advised of multiple reports of failure of the third stage turbine wheel used in both the Rolls-Roy ce 250-C30S and 250-C47B engines. A similar

turbine wheel is also installed in the 250- C40B engine which is utilized by BHTC for the Model 430. Rolls-Royce has determined that det rimental vibrations can occur within a particular range of turbine speed as a potential c ontributing factor to these failures. BHTC revised their rotorcraft flight manual and prov ided a decal to inform pilots to avoid steady-state operations at these engine turbine speeds.

Corrective

Actions: Part A: Rotorcraft Flight Manual Amendment

Within 10 calendar days after the effective date of this directive, insert flight manual BHT-430-FM-1, Temporary Revision (TR-15), or later approved revisions, into the rotorcraft flight manual and advise the pilot of this change.

Part B: Installation of Decal

In conjunction with Part A above, install the decal as per Alert Service Bulletin 430-05-34, dated 10 June 2005, or later revisions approv ed by Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada.

Authorization: For Minister of Transport

A. Wan Acting Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Contact: Mr. Bill Taylor, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4366, facsimile 613 996-9178 or e-mail taylorw@tc.gc. ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 24, 2011

t1017 

# Order

October 24, 2011

143356

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 143356

COA: 297204

Jackson CC: 09

- 060000

- FH

MICHAEL LORENZO WHITE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 19, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  |  |                         
| |  |  |  | ------------------------
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | /s/ Jack C. Bridges     
| |  |  |  | Jack C. Bridges         
| |  |  |  | Executive Vice-President
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | November 16, 2009       
| |  |  |  | Date