alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 925.16 Required program amendments. Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17, Missouri is required to make the following program amendments: ( a ) - ( o ) [Reserved]
( p ) By May 10, 2002, Missouri shall amend its program as follows: ( 1 ) - ( 21 ) [Reserved]
( q ) - ( u ) [Reserved]
( v ) By November 19, 2018, Missouri shall submit a proposed amendment, or a description of an amendment to be proposed, along with a timetable for enactment, that will add a counterpart to 30 CFR 778.11(b)(4), pertaining to the requirement for applicant and operator information provided in the permit application, at 10 CSR 40-6.030 and 10 CSR 40-6.100.
( w ) By November 19, 2018, Missouri shall submit a proposed amendment, or a description of an amendment to be proposed, along with a timetable for enactment, that will add a counterpart to 30 CFR 778.11(d)(1), pertaining to the requirement to include telephone numbers for certain individuals in the permit application, at 10 CSR 40-6.030(1)(B)-(C) and 10 CSR 40-6.100(1)(B)-(C).
[49 FR 19476, May 8, 1984] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 925.16, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
#### Kutusoff N. MacFee and another *vs.*Margaret Horan.

January 14, 1889.

Pleading — General Denial — Evidence.—In an action by an agent to sell real estate, for his commissions on a sale, a denial, in the answer, of the agreement authorizing him to sell, will not admit proof that, while making the sale, he was also acting as agent for the buyer in making the purchase.

Plaintiffs brought this action in the district court for Hennepin county, to recover commissions claimed to have been earned by the sale of certain real estate for the defendant. The answer admitted( the employment of plaintiffs by defendant, and the sale of the real estate, but alleged that it was agreed between plaintiffs and defendant that the plaintiffs’ commission should only be paid out of certain proceeds of the sale, and that the purchaser had refused to complete the sale, and such proceeds had never been received by defendant. No other defence w^s pleaded, excepting a general denial. Upon the trial, before *Rea,*J., without a jury, the defendant was allowed, against plaintiffs’ objection, upon cross-examination, to bring out the evidence referred to in the opinion. On defendant’s motion the action was dismissed by the court when plaintiffs rested their case. Plaintiffs appeal from an order refusing a new trial.

*Jackson, Ativater & Hill,*for appellants.

*G. D. & Thos. D. O’Brien,*for respondent.

Gilfillan, C. J.

It was error in the court below to admit, against plaintiffs’ objection, evidence tending to prove that, while plaintiffs were the agents for the defendant to sell the land, and were making the sale of it to Peck, one of them — MacFee—was agent also for his (MacFee’s) brother, and was acting for him in forming a “pool,” of which the brother was to be a member, for the purpose of taking from Peck, at a small advance on the price to be paid by him, a transfer of the land. Without considering whether the facts of which evidence was thus admitted would bring the case within the rule that denies the right of compensation for making a sale of property to an agent authorized to sell it, where he, without the consent of his *31principal, — the seller, — has acted in the inconsistent relation of agent for the buyer in purchasing at the sale, it is enough for the purposes of this ease that the facts of which evidence was thus admitted were not pleaded. Such facts could not be proved under a denial of the agreement sued on, nor under a denial of plaintiffs’ performance of it. That agreement was valid. There was nothing in it immoral or contrary to public policy. The case is therefore not analogous to that in *Oscanyan*v. *Arms Co.,*103 U. S. 261, 267, (even if the rule as to pleading laid down in that case would be followed here,) for in that case the contract sued on was' a corrupt one, forbidden by morality and public policy. Here what is relied on to defeat a recovery is alleged conduct or acts of plaintiffs independent of the contract, and not affecting its validity. A denial of the contract authorizing plaintiffs to sell would in no way apprise them that defendant intended to rely as a defence on proof of such conduct or acts.

Order reversed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0618

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TROY ALLAN NELSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 5, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2020

04/29/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0618
#### § 939.783 Underground mining permit applications—minimum requirements for information on environmental resources.

Part 783 of this chapter, *Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Information on Environmental Resources,* shall apply to any person who submits an application to conduct underground coal mining operations.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Energroup Technologies  Corporation
(the  "Registrant")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31,  2004,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Annual  Report"),  We,  Stephen R. Fry,  President  and  director and Thomas J.
Howells,  Secretary,Treasurer and director of the Registrant,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


By/S/ Stephen R. Fry
-----------------
Stephen R. Fry
President and Director
Dated this 28th day of March, 2005


By/S/ Thomas J. Howells
-----------------
Thomas J. Howells
Secretary, Treasurer and Director
Dated this 24th day of March, 2005
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         Independent Auditors' Consent




The Board of Directors
American Technical Ceramics Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No.333-50913) on Form S-8 of American Technical Ceramics Corp. of our report
dated September 4, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
American Technical Ceramics Corp. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1998 and
1997, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30,
1998, which report appears in the June 30, 1998 annual report on form 10-K of
American Technical Ceramics Corp.


                                               KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Jericho, New York
September 14, 1998
Exhibit
23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-136500, 333-115973, 333-103310, 333-85321, 333-51200, 33-80838, 33-50510,
33-41515, 33-41509, 333-39091, 33-21092, 333-153015) of CyberOptics Corporation
of our report dated March 9, 2009 relating to the financial statements,
financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Minneapolis, Minnesota 
March 11, 2010



---
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
---------------------

                                                            Contact: Julian Reid
                                                                        Chairman
                                                      Tel:       44 20 7233 1333
                                                 E-Mail   julianreid@3afunds.com

            SAFFRON FUND, INC. ANNOUNCES APPOINTMENT OF NEW DIRECTOR

NEW YORK, July 25, 2003 -- The Board of Directors of Saffron Fund, Inc. (the
"Fund") announces the appointment of Mr. Andrew Pegge of Laxey Partners Ltd as a
director.

The Board's decision follows discussions between the Fund and some of its larger
institutional stockholders, during which those stockholders expressed a desire
for representation on the Board of Directors. Mr. Pegge will occupy the seat
previously held by Mr. A. Douglas Eu of JF International Management Inc.
("JFIMI"), who resigned on May 8, 2003 in connection with the resignation of
JFIMI as investment manager to the Fund effective June 30, 2003. Mr. Pegge will
be a Class III director under the Fund's staggered board system, and his term
will expire at the 2004 Annual General Meeting.

Saffron Fund, Inc. is a closed-end, non-diversified management investment
company.
### §302706. Eligibility for inclusion on National Register

(a) In General.—Property of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization may be determined to be eligible for inclusion on the National Register.

(b) Consultation.—In carrying out its responsibilities under section 306108 of this title, a Federal agency shall consult with any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that attaches religious and cultural significance to property described in subsection (a).

(c) Hawaii.—In carrying out responsibilities under section 302303 of this title, the State Historic Preservation Officer for Hawaii shall—

(1) consult with Native Hawaiian organizations in assessing the cultural significance of any property in determining whether to nominate the property to the National Register;

(2) consult with Native Hawaiian organizations in developing the cultural component of a preservation program or plan for the property; and

(3) enter into a memorandum of understanding or agreement with Native Hawaiian organizations for the assessment of the cultural significance of a property in determining whether to nominate the property to the National Register and to carry out the cultural component of the preservation program or plan.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3201.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302706 | 16 U.S.C. 470a(d)(6). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §101(d)(6), as added Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4006(a)(2), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4757. |

Section
EXHIBIT 31.1
                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert C. Silzer, Sr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GPS Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  November 19, 2007

/s/    ROBERT C. SILZER, SR.
       -----------------------
Name:  Robert C. Silzer, Sr.
Its:   Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Steven G. Larson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(i) the Quarterly Report of LaserCard Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 2, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LaserCard Corporation.


Date: August 10, 2010/s/Steven G. LarsonSteven G. LarsonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Motion to Withdraw Granted; Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October

4 , 2012.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00316

- CR

CHRISTOPHER SOTO

- JOHNSON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Ha rris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1251860



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. After a pre

- sentence investigation and hearing, o n February 29, 2012 , the trial court sentenced appellant t o confinement for seven years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.2

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 80 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this dat e, more than sixty days has passed and no pro se response has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. We

are not t o address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State
, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
| 1.   | I      am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Rudy      Nutrition. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Attached      to this certification is Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,      2008, a periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with      the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which      contains consolidated financialstatements. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | I      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | The      periodic report containing the consolidated financial statements fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange      Act, and |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | The      information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the issuer for the periodspresented. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                  |   |                                                                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      October 14, 2008        |   | /s/      Daniel E. Ruettiger                        |   |
|                                                                  |   | Daniel      E. Ruettiger                                                |   |
|                                                                  |   | ChCChief      Executive Officer and Chief      Financial Officer        |   |
|                                                                  |   | (Principal      executive officer and      Principal financial officer) |   |
Exhibit 12 (b)

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.
                Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                 and preferred securities dividend requirements
                          (in thousands, except ratios)



                                                        Three-month period ended
                                                              March 31, 2002
                                                              --------------

Net Income..................................................      $ 7,995
                                                                 -----------
Fixed Charges
         Trustee Fees.......................................           30
         Audit Fees.........................................            5
         Administrative and Consulting Fees.................          255.88

Total Fixed Charges.........................................          290.88
                                                                 -----------
Earnings before fixed charges...............................     $  8,285.88
                                                                 -----------

Fixed charges, as above.....................................     $    290.88
                                                                 ===========
Preferred securities dividend...............................             ---
                                                                 -----------
Fixed charges including preferred securities dividends......     $    290.88
                                                                 ===========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred securities.           28.49
                                                                 ===========
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-130055, 033-54959, 033-60005, 333-88786, 333-98913, 333-98915 and333-109863 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 15, 2006, relating to the financial statements and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofLongs Drug Stores Corporation for the year ended January 26, 2006. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

San Francisco, California 

March 15, 2006
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GPS Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to GPS Industries, Inc. and
will be retained by GPS Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       /s/ ROBERT C. SILZER, SR.
Date:  August 16, 2004          By:  ___________________________
                                       Robert C. Silzer, Sr.
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Duly Authorized Officer)


                                       /s/ GEORGE DORIN.
Date:  August 16, 2004          By:  ___________________________
                                       George Dorin.
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Duly Authorized Officer)