alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1543a. Report on hostilities involving United States Armed Forces

#### (a) In general

Not later than 48 hours after any incident in which the United States Armed Forces are involved in an attack or hostilities, whether in an offensive or defensive capacity, the President shall transmit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the incident, unless the President—

(1) otherwise reports the incident within 48 hours pursuant to section 1543 of this title; or

(2) has determined prior to the incident, and so reported pursuant to section 1549 of this title, that the United States Armed Forces involved in the incident would be operating under specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 1544(b) of this title.

#### (b) Matters to be included

Each report required by subsection (a) shall include—

(1) the authority or authorities under which the United States Armed Forces were operating when the incident occurred;

(2) the date, location, and duration of the incident and the other parties involved;

(3) a description of the United States Armed Forces involved in the incident and the mission of such Armed Forces;

(4) the numbers of any combatant casualties and civilian casualties that occurred as a result of the incident; and

(5) any other information the President determines appropriate.

(Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XII, §1230, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 457.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, and not as part of the War Powers Resolution which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Congressional Defense Committees" Defined

Congressional defense committees means the Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives, see section 3 of Pub. L. 118–31, 137 Stat. 164. See note under section 101 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
### §21052. Report

#### (a) In general

Each entity which receives a grant under this subpart shall submit to the Commission a report describing the activities carried out with the funds provided under the grant.

#### (b) Deadline

An entity shall submit a report required under subsection (a) not later than 60 days after the end of the fiscal year for which the entity received the grant which is the subject of the report.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title II, §282, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1702.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15452 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9969 

To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts 

of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2024 

Ms. HAGEMAN (for herself, Ms. MALOY, and Mr. CURTIS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address 

the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper 

Colorado River Basin Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING TO AD4 DRESS POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF A CERTAIN 

5 RECORD OF DECISION ON THE UPPER COLO6 RADO RIVER BASIN FUND. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Inte9 rior, acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation, 

10 and the Secretary of Energy, acting through the AdminisVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:32 Oct 24, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H9969.IH H9969

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9969 IH

1 trator of the Western Area Power Administration, in con2 sultation with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Manage3 ment Work Group, shall enter into a memorandum of un4 derstanding to explore and address the impact that the 

5 record of decision entitled the ‘‘Supplement to the 2016 

6 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Manage7 ment Plan Record of Decision’’ and dated July 2024 (re8 ferred to in this section as the ‘‘record of decision’’) has 

9 on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund (referred to in 

10 this section as the ‘‘Fund’’). 

11 (b) REQUIRED PLAN.—The memorandum of under12 standing entered into under subsection (a) shall, using in13 formation derived from existing hydropower contracts, in14 clude the establishment of a plan to— 

15 (1) address the effects that the record of deci16 sion may have on Fund obligations including routine 

17 operations, maintenance, and replacement of critical 

18 infrastructure; 

19 (2) address the impact that the record of deci20 sion has on hydropower production at Glen Canyon 

21 Dam, including costs to replace hydropower re22 sources and grid reliability; and 

23 (3) identify impacts that the record of decision 

24 has had on species listed as a threatened species or 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9969 IH

1 an endangered species under section 4 of the Endan2 gered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                                   (12/31/00)


The following is a list showing MAI Systems Corporation and each of its
subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2000, indicating each jurisdiction under the
laws of which it was organized:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 JURISDICTION OF
                      NAME:                                      INCORPORATION
                      ----                                       ---------------
               <S>                                               <C>
               MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION                           DELAWARE

               Hotel Information Systems, Inc.                   Delaware

               CIMPRO, Inc.                                      Delaware

               Gaming Systems International                      Nevada

               MAI Canada Ltd.                                   Canada

               CLS Software International, Inc.                  California

               CLS de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                       Mexico

               Computerized Lodging Systems B.V.                 Netherlands

               Hotel Information Systems Ltd.                    Hong Kong

               Hotel Information Systems, Pte. Limited           Singapore

               MAI Information Solutions Limited                 United Kingdom

               Boss Solutions Limited                            Hong Kong

               MAI del Caribe, Inc.                              Delaware

               HIS Solutions Malaysia                            Malaysia
</TABLE>
§ 1639.7 Types of decisions. ( a ) A board may grant a classification into Class 2-D until the end of the academic school year.
( b ) Upon the expiration of a 2-D classification, a board shall review any request for extension of the classification in the same manner as the first request for Class 2-D. This section does not relieve a registrant of his duties under § 1621.1 of this chapter.
( c ) The board may deny a claim for Class 2-D when the evidence fails to merit any of the criteria established in this section.
[47 FR 4657, Feb. 1, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 24458, July 1, 1987]
### §3596. Regulations

The Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations to carry out the purpose of this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title IV, §404(b), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1167, §3595; renumbered §3596, Pub. L. 97–35, title XVII, §1704(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 756.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–35 renumbered section 3596 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 9 months after Oct. 13, 1978, and congressional review of provisions of sections 401 through 412 of Pub. L. 95–454, see section 415(a)(1), (b), of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 3131 of this title.
700

650

700

650

650

650

S L A K E M IC H IG A N

D R

S L A K E M IC H IG A N D R

S A L O N A R D

C O U N T Y H W Y-U

C O U N T Y H W Y-U

L O W E R L A S A L L E

R D

C L A R L IN

R D

M O U N T L O O K O U T R D

S L A K E M IC H IG A N

D R

S L A K E M IC H IG A N D R

S A L O N A R D

C O U N T Y H W Y-U

C O U N T Y H W Y-U

L O W E R L A S A L L E

R D

C L A R L IN

R D

M O U N T L O O K O U T R D

Bear Creek

Schuyler Creek

Woodard

Creek

Sch

u

yler Creek

Woodard Creek

Woodard

Creek

L A K E M I C H I G A N

Salona

Claybanks

Cemetery

Jacksonport

SW

Sturgeon

Bay West

Sturgeon

Bay East

Algoma

Forestville Algoma NE

45' 44°

FEET

4 4

49

17'

44°

44

73 74

2

E

4

000m

49

40'

30"

310

000

74

49

52

49

49

2 4

49 000m

4

87°

30"

44

52

71

FEET

000

54

47

71 79

45'

49

49

4 87°

42'30"

44°

30"

000m

44°

87°

51

72

54

50

FEET

30"

49

49

000m

49

49

4 4

000

42

55

660 78

E 4

76 4

49

80

49

49

49

4

37'

43

30"

N

75 22' 87°

680

17'

37'

45

4

42

76

49

4

49

75

50

48

30"

30" 4

73

53

51

4

49

49

49

49

47

78

72 80

45

43

20'

20'

22' 15'

4

4

49

FEET

4

49

4 79

53

48

77

N

49

42'

40'

15'

000

49 49

340

49

55

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

ALGOMA NE, WI

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

ALGOMA NE QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 16T

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, July 2008

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1998

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 13 ́

4 MILS

4° 21 ́

77 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

16T

DQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE>      5
 <MULTIPLIER>        1000
        
 <S>                           <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
 <PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
 <CASH>                          133
 <SECURITIES>                       0
 <RECEIVABLES>                   736
 <ALLOWANCES>                       4
 <INVENTORY>                      560
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                1581
 <PP&E>                         20850
 <DEPRECIATION>                  5407
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                 20164
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1494
 <BONDS>                         1250
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
 <PREFERRED>                        0
 <COMMON>                         236
 <OTHER-SE>                     11736
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   20164
 <SALES>                         1124
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                1127
 <CGS>                            966
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                   1817
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                  56
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                51
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                 (746)
 <INCOME-TAX>                       0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>             (746)
 <DISCONTINUED>                     0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
 <CHANGES>                          0
 <NET-INCOME>                    (746)
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.03)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                   (.03)
         


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20954

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANIEL VALLE-CABRERA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CR-6-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

TheFederalPublic Defender appointed to represent Daniel Valle-Cabrera

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Valle-Cabrera has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 12, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
1 min read

# FY 2022 NASA Budget Request

### NASA

### Brian Dunbar

Jan 27, 2015

Article

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

NASA's fiscal year 2022 budget request and associated files.

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser thatsupports HTML5 video

NASA FY 2022 Budget Request (released May 28, 2021)

FY 2022 Budget Request SummaryFY 2022 NASA Agency Fact SheetFY 2022 Mission Fact SheetsFY 2022 Congressional Justification NASA Budget RequestFY 2022 Volume of Integrated Performance

Initial FY 2022 Budget Request Summary (released April 20, 2021)

**Reports and Plans**

 FY 2021 Volume of Integrated Performance (8 MB PDF)

Required Reporting under the Good Accounting Obligation in Government Act of 2019 (February 2021)Fiscal Year 2021 Agency Financial ReportFY 2021 Inspector General Act Amendments Report

Previous Years Budget Requests

z

Previous Years’ Strategic Plans and Reports
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50070 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEOPOLDO GARCIA-PARRA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-00-CR-1162-ALL-H

--------------------

August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leopoldo Garcia-Parra appeals the 57-month term of

imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of

being found in the United States after removal in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Parra argues that his sentence should not

have exceeded the two-year maximum term of imprisonment

prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Garcia-Parra acknowledges that

his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but
No. 01-50070 

-2-

seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of

the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). GarciaParra’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### In the Matter of Austin F. Hasselberg, Petitioner, v. William S. Hults, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.

Motion granted to prosecute appeal on original papers and five typewritten briefs.
1

The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of North Dakota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2267

___________

John V. Goetz, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of North Dakota.

Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of *

Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: May 18, 2006

Filed: June 2, 2006 

___________

Before MURPHY, BEAM, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

John V. Goetz appeals the district court’s1

 order affirming the denial of

disability insurance benefits. As relevant to the instant appeal, Goetz alleged

disability since June 2001 from obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). After a

hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that (1) Goetz’s OCD and

other medical problems were severe but not of listing-level severity; (2) his subjective

complaints were not fully credible; and (3) his residual functional capacity (RFC)
-2-

precluded his past relevant work, but he could perform jobs a vocational expert

identified in response to a hypothetical. The Appeals Council denied review, and the

district court affirmed. 

Goetz’s only argument on appeal is that the ALJ erred by not adopting the

mental RFC opinion of treating psychiatrist Elsa Remer, who rated many of Goetz’s

work-related abilities as poor or markedly limited. We find that the ALJ properly

discounted Dr. Remer’s opinion. See Goff v. Barnhart, 421 F.3d 785, 790 (8th Cir.

2005) (treating physician’s opinion does not automatically control because record

must be evaluated as whole); Ellis v. Barnhart, 392 F.3d 988, 994 (8th Cir. 2005)

(while medical source opinions are considered in assessing RFC, final RFC

determination is left to ALJ). We agree with the ALJ that there were inconsistencies

between Dr. Remer’s RFC assessment and her treatment notes. Further, it appears

that Goetz’s decision to stop taking his prescribed medications at one point caused

him to deteriorate and require hospitalization, see Brown v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 535,

540-41 (8th Cir. 2004) (ALJ was free not to give controlling weight to treating

physician’s opinion because claimant was noncompliant with prescribed treatment;

if impairment can be controlled by medication, it cannot be viewed as disabling); and

as the district court noted, Dr. Remer did not discourage Goetz from seeking work,

and she drafted her RFC opinion eight months after the period to which it related. 

Accordingly, we affirm, and we deny Goetz’s motion to supplement the record

with evidence that is unrelated to the period at issue here.

______________________________
#### (A) The People of The State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Fish, Appellant. (B) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Philip Marcus, Appellant. (C) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Verdia Irene Súber, Appellant.-— (D) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hazel Griffin, Appellant.

[In each action] Motion hy respondent to dismiss appeal granted, and appeal dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur. [Same decision] Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
November 10, 2014

Heather McTeer Toney Regional Administrator US EPA Region 4 Atlanta Federal Center, 12 th Floor 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303-8960

Re: EPA’s August 19, 2014, response to South Carolina’s designation recommendation for

the 2012 PM 2.5 NAAQS

Dear Ms. Toney:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on your response to our state’s designation recommendation. We support the EPA’s deferral of the PM 2.5 designation for the Aiken-Augusta area in consideration of the monitoring data conc erns. This is a prope r use of the Clean Air Act’s deferral option and forestalls a final desi gnation that would not show the area meeting the

PM 2.5 NAAQS. It is our expectation that the 20 14 monitoring data will support an “attainment” designation when the data is certified in 2015.

Please contact Robert J. Brow n of my staff by telephone at (803) 898-4105 or by email at brownrj@dhec.sc.gov if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Myra C. Reece, Chief Bureau of Air Quality

ec: Beverly Banister, U.S. EPA Keith Bentley, Georgia Department of Na tural Resources, Environmental Protection

Division
# C_2023174EN.01001401.xml

| 16.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/14

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 174/11)

| Member State | Greece |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned Route | Ioannina – Heraklion |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 October 2023 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority
  General Directorate for Economic Oversight &
  Administrative Support





  Athens International Airport, Building 45, |
| P.O. 190 1P.O. 190 19, Spata, GREECE |

Member State

Greece

Concerned Route

Ioannina – Heraklion

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 October 2023

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge

Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority

General Directorate for Economic Oversight &

Administrative Support

Athens International Airport, Building 45,

P.O. 190 1P.O. 190 19, Spata, GREECE

Tel. +30 210 3541313, 3541327, 3541349

Emails: info@hcaa.gov.gr, gd.ecfin@hcaa.gov.gr, a4.a@hcaa.gov.gr, pso@hcaa.gov.gr

Internet: https://hcaa.gov.gr/

---