alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1645.6 Considerations relevant to granting or denying a claim for Class 4-D. ( a ) The board shall first determine whether the registrant is requesting classification in Class 4-D because he is a regular minister of religion or because he is a duly ordained minister of religion.
( b ) If the registrant claims to be a duly ordained minister of religion, the board will: ( 1 ) Determine whether the registrant has been ordained, in accordance with the ceremonial ritual or discipline of a church, religious sect, or organization established on the basis of a community of faith and belief, doctrines and practices of religious character, to preach and teach the doctrines of such church, sect, or organization and to administer the rites and ceremonies thereof in public worship; and
( 2 ) Determine whether the registrant as his regular, customary, and bona fide vocation, preaches and teaches the principles of religion and administers the ordinances of public worship, as embodied in the creed or principles of the church, sect, or organization by which the registrant was ordained.
( c ) If the registrant claims to be a regular minister of religion, the board will: ( 1 ) Determine whether the registrant as his customary and regular calling or customary and regular full-time profession, preaches and teaches the principles of religion of a church, a religious sect, or organization of which he is a member, without having been formally ordained as a minister of religion; and
( 2 ) Determine whether the registrant is recognized by such church, sect, or organization as a regular minister.
( d ) If the board determines that the registrant is a regular minister of religion or duly ordained minister of religion he shall be classified in Class 4-D.
Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------

             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post Effective Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-93773 of Potash Corporation of
Saskatchewan Inc. of our reports dated February 6, 2004 appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2003.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Registered Chartered Accountants

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
August 16, 2004
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 17, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-752 Lower Tribunal No. 20-62

________________ 

### S.Z., a Juvenile , Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Dawn Denaro, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Brian H. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. Jacobs v. State, 396 So. 2d 713, 716 (Fla. 1981) (“One who participates with another in a common criminal scheme is guilty of all crimes committed in furtherance of that scheme regardless of whether he or she physically participates in that crime.”).
#### § 77.801 Grounding resistors.

The grounding resistor, where required, shall be of the proper ohmic value to limit the voltage drop in the grounding circuit external to the resistor to not more than 100 volts under fault conditions. The grounding resistor shall be rated for maximum fault current continuously and insulated from ground for a voltage equal to the phase-to-phase voltage of the system.
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Subpart W 

Meeting Documentation: American Petroleum Institute 4/20/10 Date Staff Contact 

Information (Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.) 

Written CommeProvideDid they also subto Dock

4/20/10 

Roger Fernandez Akachi Imegwu 

Reid Smith British Petroleum Peter Dahling Chevron Mark DePaul ExxonMobil Al Collins Occidental Michele Schoeppe API Clint Gill ConocoPhillips Miriam Conner Shell Karen Ritter API Daniel Burt Suncor Tim Thuston Williams Mark Bareta Williams 

See following pages No writte

commentwere submprior to thmeeting. 
Bill Grygar 

Anadarko Arun Naik Shell Carol Butero Kinder Morgan Suzie Holland Chevron Olga Magas Devon Kevin Bailey ExxonMobil Clare Poffenburger ExxonMobil 
API / EPA Meeting 

USEPA OAR Offices, 1310 L Street, Washington DC 

April 20, 2010 3:00 pm EDT 

List of Issues Discussed

Subpart W

1. EPA should reconsider the large number of wells included in subpart W 

2. EPA’s cost for subpart W is too low 3. EPA should consider a phased in approach due to the large number of wells 

4. EPA should consider simpler methods, less cost, balanced against amount of emissions 

5. EPA should consider population averages at basin/sub basin level 

6. EPA should consider small exclusion for compressors, heaters, low bleed pneumatics 

7. EPA should consider the difficulty of reporting emissions for leased, rented, and contracte
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2284

In re: TIMOTHY GOVERNOR ALEXANDER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(3:04-cr-00197-RJC-DCK-1; 3:10-cv-00324-RJC)

Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Governor Alexander, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Governor Alexander petitions for a writ of 

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting 

on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. He seeks an 

order from this court directing the district court to act. Our 

review of the district court’s docket reveals that, on November 

20, 2012, the district court dismissed Alexander’s § 2255

motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently 

decided Alexander’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. 

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
§ 772.10 Information collection. ( a ) In accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.,* the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection and recordkeeping requirements of this part. The OMB clearance number is 1029-0112. OSM and State regulatory authorities use the information collected under this part to maintain knowledge of coal exploration activities, evaluate the need for an exploration permit, and ensure that exploration activities comply with the environmental protection, public participation, and reclamation requirements of parts 772 and 815 of this chapter and 30 U.S.C. 1262. Persons seeking to conduct coal exploration must respond to obtain a benefit.
( b ) OSM estimates that the combined public reporting and recordkeeping burden for all respondents under this part will average 11 hours per notice or application submitted, including time spent reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Specifically, OSM estimates that preparation of a notice of intent to explore under § 772.11 will require an average of 10 hours per notice, preparation and processing of an application for coal exploration under § 772.12 will require an average of 103 hours per application, compliance with § 772.14 will require an average of 18 hours per application, and recordkeeping and information collection under § 772.15 will require an average of approximately 1 hour per response. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of these information collection requirements, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Information Collection Clearance Officer, 1951 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20240; and the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Interior Desk Officer, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503. Please refer to OMB Control Number 1029-0112 in any correspondence.
[64 FR 70837, Dec. 17, 1999]
§ 931.26 Required plan amendments. Pursuant to 30 CFR 884.15, New Mexico is required to submit for OSM's approval the following proposed plan amendments by the date specified. ( a ) By January 21, 1997, New Mexico shall revise NMSA 69-25B-2 and 3.B to provide references to August 3, 1977, the effective date of SMCRA, or otherwise modify its plan, to ensure that the reclamation of post-August 3, 1977, sites is specifically provided for with counterpart provisions to sections 402(g)(4) and 403(b)(2).
( b ) By January 21, 1997, New Mexico shall further revise NMSA 69-25B-3.B to provide a definition for “eligible lands and water” that is consistent with the term as defined at section 404 of SMCRA.
( c ) By January 21, 1997, New Mexico shall revise NMSA 69-25B-6.A, or otherwise modify its plan, to reflect the same expenditure priorities as counterpart section 403(a) of SMCRA.
( d ) By January 21, 1997, New Mexico shall revise NMSA 69-25B-6.A by deleting NMSA 69-25B-6.A(4) and item No. I (d) of the “Ranking and Selection” section of its plan.
( e ) By January 21, 1997, New Mexico shall revise NMSA 69-25B-6.C by reinserting the word “coal.”
[61 FR 38381, July 24, 1996]
#### § 168a.3 Definition.

*Sponsoring Agency.* A DoD Component or an activity that is designated to award NDSEG fellowships under § 168a.5(a).
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2014 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





Date: December 1, 2015








/s/F. Stephen Ward


F. Stephen Ward


Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
### §565. Establishment of committee

(a) Establishment.—

(1) Determination to establish committee.—If after considering comments and applications submitted under section 564, the agency determines that a negotiated rulemaking committee can adequately represent the interests that will be significantly affected by a proposed rule and that it is feasible and appropriate in the particular rulemaking, the agency may establish a negotiated rulemaking committee. In establishing and administering such a committee, the agency shall comply with chapter 10 of this title with respect to such committee, except as otherwise provided in this subchapter.

(2) Determination not to establish committee.—If after considering such comments and applications, the agency decides not to establish a negotiated rulemaking committee, the agency shall promptly publish notice of such decision and the reasons therefor in the Federal Register and, as appropriate, in trade or other specialized publications, a copy of which shall be sent to any person who applied for, or nominated another person for membership on the negotiating 1 rulemaking committee to represent such interests with respect to the proposed rule.

(b) Membership.—The agency shall limit membership on a negotiated rulemaking committee to 25 members, unless the agency head determines that a greater number of members is necessary for the functioning of the committee or to achieve balanced membership. Each committee shall include at least one person representing the agency.

(c) Administrative Support.—The agency shall provide appropriate administrative support to the negotiated rulemaking committee, including technical assistance.

(Added Pub. L. 101–648, §3(a), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4972, §585; renumbered §565 and amended Pub. L. 102–354, §3(a)(2), (3), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 944; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(7), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4305.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 10 of this title" for "the Federal Advisory Committee Act".

1992—Pub. L. 102–354, §3(a)(2), renumbered section 585 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 102–354, §3(a)(3), substituted "section 564" for "section 584".

1 So in original. Probably should be "negotiated".
§ 1701.1 Purpose, scope, applicability. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart establishes the policies and procedures the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) will follow in implementing the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, as amended. This subpart sets forth the procedures ODNI must follow in collecting and maintaining personal information from or about individuals, as well as procedures by which individuals may request to access or amend records about themselves and request an accounting of disclosures of those records by the ODNI. In addition, this subpart details parameters for disclosing personally identifiable information to persons other than the subject of a record.
( b ) *Scope.* The provisions of this subpart apply to all records in systems of records maintained by ODNI directorates, centers, mission managers and other sub-organizations [hereinafter called “components”] that are retrieved by an individual's name or personal identifier.
( c ) *Applicability.* This subpart governs the following individuals and entities: ( 1 ) All ODNI staff and components must comply with this subpart. The terms “staff” and “component” are defined in § 1701.2.
( 2 ) Unless specifically exempted, this subpart also applies to advisory committees and councils within the meaning of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) which provide advice to: Any official or component of ODNI; or the President, and for which ODNI has been delegated responsibility for providing service.
( d ) *Relation to Freedom of Information Act.* The ODNI shall provide a subject individual under this subpart all records which are otherwise accessible to such individual under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40823 Conference Calendar

TODD W. ALTSCHUL, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-96-47

- - - - - - - - - - February 24, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Todd W. Altschul, Texas prisoner #586467, filed a notice of appeal from the magistrate judge’s report, which recommended that his petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if
necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). At the time of filing the notice of appeal, the district court had not entered a final or otherwise appealable order; orders ofNo. 96-40823 - 2 - the magistrate judge are not appealable to this court. Trufant v. Autocon, Inc. , 729 F.2d 308, 309 (5th Cir. 1984). Altschul’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9504 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require information on 

the national debt to be included on ballots in elections for Federal 

office, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 

Mr. LOPEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require 

information on the national debt to be included on ballots 

in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF INFORMATION ON NATIONAL 

4 DEBT ON BALLOTS IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS. 

5 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Subtitle A of title III of the 

6 Help America Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081 et seq.) 

7 is amended by inserting after section 303 the following 

8 new section: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9504 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 303A. INCLUSION OF INFORMATION ON NATIONAL 

2 DEBT ON BALLOTS. 

3 ‘‘(a) REQUIREMENT.—Each State shall ensure that 

4 a ballot used in an election for Federal office in the State 

5 includes a separate statement of the total gross Federal 

6 debt, as calculated by the Secretary of the Treasury, for 

7 each of the 3 most recent fiscal years ending before the 

8 date of the election. 

9 ‘‘(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply 

10 with respect to each election for Federal office held on 

11 or after the date of the enactment of this section.’’. 

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT RELATING TO EN13 FORCEMENT.—Section 401 of such Act (52 U.S.C. 21111) 

14 is amended by striking ‘‘and 303’’ and inserting ‘‘303, and 

15 303A’’. 

16 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

17 of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating 

18 to section 303 the following: 

‘‘Sec. 303A. Inclusion of information on national debt on ballots.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS) AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001059364
<NAME> EAGLE-PICHER HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,826
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,135
<INVENTORY>                                    101,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               245,980
<PP&E>                                         347,678
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 776,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          194,217
<BONDS>                                        394,761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          106,671
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   776,827
<SALES>                                        641,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               641,237
<CGS>                                          514,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  514,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               103,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,601
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,601
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.11)


</TABLE>
§ 1800.22 Action and determination(s) by originator(s) or any interested party. ( a ) *Initial action for access.* ( 1 ) NACIC components tasked pursuant to a FOIA request shall search all relevant record systems within their cognizance. They shall: ( i ) Determine whether a record exists;
( ii ) Determine whether and to what extent any FOIA exemptions apply;
( iii ) Approve the disclosure of all non-exempt records or portions of records for which they are the originator; and
( iv ) Forward to the Coordinator all records approved for release or necessary for coordination with or referral to another originator or interested party.
( 2 ) In making these decisions, the NACIC component officers shall be guided by the applicable law as well as the procedures specified at § 1800.31 and § 1800.32 regarding confidential commercial information and personal information (about persons other than the requester).
( b ) *Referrals and coordinations.* As applicable and within twenty (20) days, pursuant to the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996, of receipt by the Coordinator, any NACIC records containing information originated by other NACIC components shall be forwarded to those entities for action in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section and return. Records originated by other federal agencies or NACIC records containing other federal agency information shall be forwarded to such agencies within twenty (20) days of our completion of initial action in the case for action under their regulations and direct response to the requester (for other agency records) or return to NACIC (for NACIC records).
### SUBCHAPTER II—OTHER PAID LEAVE
#### § 914.1 Scope.

This part contains all rules applicable only within Indiana that have been adopted under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.

[47 FR 32107, July 26, 1982]
§ 113.5 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall monitor compliance with this part.
( b ) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall ensure Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) implementation of this part.
( c ) The Heads of the DoD Components shall ensure compliance with this part.