NUREG/CR-7236, Vol. 

Results of Open Testing for 

the Program to Assess the 

Reliability of Emerging 

Nondestructive Techniques 

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Results of Open Testing for 

the Program to Assess the 

Reliability of Emerging 

Nondestructive Techniques 

NUREG/CR-7236, Vol. 

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Manuscript Completed: December 2016 

Date Published: August 2017 

Prepared by: 

R. M. Meyer, A. E. Holmes, and P. G. Heasler 

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

P.O. Box 999 

Richland, WA 99352 

I. Prokofiev and B. Lin, NRC Project Managers 

NRC Job Code V6286 

iii

ABSTRACT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has established the Program to Assess the 

Reliability of Emerging Nondestructive Techniques (PARENT) whose goal was to investigate 

the performance of current emerging and perspective novel nondestructive examination (NDE) 

procedures and techniques to find flaws in nickel-alloy welds and base materials. This was 

performed by conducting a series of open and blind international round-robin tests on a set of 

nickel alloy piping components that include large-bore dissimilar metal welds (LBDMW), smallbore dissimilar metal welds (SBDMW), and bottom-mounted instrumentation (BMI) penetration 

welds. The project was split into open and blind testing portions for the purpose of separating 

the evaluation of novel techniques that are at a stage of relative immaturity for field testing and 

which were implemented by teams that may not have significant experience in conducting field 

examinations (open testing) from the evaluation of more established techniques implemented by 

commercial inspection vendors (blind testing). This report is focused on documenting the open 

testing activity and results. The motivation for evaluating emerging NDE techniques includes the 

desire to identify more effective methods for detecting and characterizing rapidly growing forms 

of degradation, such as primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) and interdendritic 

stress corrosion cracking (IDSCC).

PARENT was a follow-on to the Program for Inspection of Nickel Alloy Components (PINC), 

which was based on the Bilateral International Agreements with participants and the in-kind 

contribution of resources from organizations of Finland, Japan, Republic of Korea, Sweden, and 

the United States of America to evaluate several nondestructive techniques for detection and 

characterization of PWSCC and IDSCC in SBDMW and BMI components. In February 2012, the 

NRC conducted new agreements with VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Nuclear 

Regulation Authority of Japan, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Swedish Radiation Safety 

Authority, and Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate to establish PARENT to conduct a 

series of round-robin tests on SBDMWs, BMIs, and LBDMWs. The open testing portion of 

PARENT was performed with knowledge of true-state information in the open test blocks 

provided to teams conducting tests. As a result, no detection performance analyses were 

performed on open test data. Thus, the evaluation of open test data is based on statistical 

analyses of sizing data and qualitative review of data response images.

v 

FOREWORD

Leakage events due to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) or interdendritic 

stress corrosion cracking (IDSCC) have been recorded in the United States and internationally. 

This cracking has been observed at several weld locations in reactor coolant systems including 

penetrations to the reactor vessel (e.g., control rod drive mechanism [CRDM] penetrations, 

bottom-mounted instrumentation [BMI] penetrations, and nozzle penetrations), and nozzle 

penetrations on steam generator and pressurizer components. Inservice inspections (ISI) are 

conducted at nuclear power plants to detect cracks before leakage occurs. The effectiveness of 

ISI is dependent on several factors such as the frequency with which periodic examinations 

occur, human factors, the performance capability of the nondestructive examination (NDE) 

procedures and techniques used, etc. Leakage events, both domestic and internationally, have 

indicated a need for additional research to evaluate the performance of NDE procedures and 

techniques for the detection and sizing of PWSCC and IDSCC flaws in reactor components. 

In February 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission executed agreements with 

organizations in Finland, Japan, Republic of Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States 

to establish the Program to Assess the Reliability of Emerging Nondestructive Techniques 

(PARENT) to investigate the performance of current and emerging NDE techniques to find flaws 

in nickel-alloy welds and base material. This assessment was performed by conducting a series 

of open and blind international round-robin tests on a set of mockups. The project was split into 

open and blind testing to separate the evaluation of novel techniques implemented by 

nonqualified teams from the evaluation of more established techniques implemented by 

commercial inspection service providers. The objective of the blind testing was to obtain 

quantitative empirical estimates of the performance of contemporary NDE inspection 

procedures and techniques used within the industry to determine which may be more reliable for 

detecting and accurate sizing PWSCC or IDSCC flaws. The objective of the open testing was to 

evaluate the performance of novel NDE procedures and techniques that have not yet reached 

the maturity level for field testing. The motivation for evaluating novel NDE procedures and 

techniques was to explore their potential for improving the performance of NDE in comparison 

to established techniques. Analysis of the open test data included a quantitative evaluation of 

sizing performance and qualitative evaluation of signal response images. 

The purpose of this report was to publish the results of the sizing analyses and the qualitative 

evaluation of signal response images for data collected in open testing for PARENT. The open 

test assessed several novel and non-standard NDE procedures and techniques such as 

nonlinear ultrasonic testing (NLUT) and advanced phased array UT (ADVPAUT). Some 

highlights obtained from the results of the sizing analysis include observations that ADVPAUT 

and NLUT procedures exhibited more consistent depth sizing error over the range of flaw 

depths sampled in comparison to established PAUT procedures. Further, sub-harmonic NLUT 

procedures exhibited better overall depth sizing performance than higher-harmonic NLUT 

procedures. Highlights of the qualitative analysis of data response images included the 

observation that identifying stress corrosion crack tip signals with established PAUT procedures 

can be difficult and that crack tip signal identification by image analysis is, in part, a subjective 

determination. Further, for both PAUT and ADVPAUT procedures, data response images 

illustrate the difficulty in distinguishing noise from SCC crack tip responses. The results obtained 

in open testing can be considered optimistic to what would be anticipated under blind test 

conditions or field conditions. Thus, the PARENT open test results have illustrated that NDE 

procedures and techniques are limited to less than ideal performance by their fundamental 

capability and that overall ISI effectiveness could benefit from NDE technology advancements 
vi

that improve upon fundamental capability. Finally, the data generated from PARENT open 

testing provides an understanding of the state of art in NDE capabilities and can be used to 

evaluate emerging inspection techniques in the future.
vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................................iii

FOREWORD .............................................................................................................................. v

LIST OF FIGURES...............................................................................................................................xi

LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................xix

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................xxiii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.......................................................................................................xxvii

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................xxix

1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1-1

1.1 Laboratory Grown SCC Specimens....................................................................1-2

1.2 Open NDE Techniques Report...........................................................................1-2

1.3 Atlas Information Tool ........................................................................................1-3

1.4 PARENT Organization........................................................................................1-3

1.5 Organization of Report .......................................................................................1-3

2 TEST BLOCK DESCRIPTIONS ....................................................................................2-1

2.1 Full Circumference Large Bore and Small Bore Dissimilar Metal Weld Test 

Blocks ................................................................................................................2-1

2.2 Partial Circumference Large Bore Dissimilar Metal Weld Test Blocks ................2-4

2.3 Flat Bar Test Blocks ...........................................................................................2-5

2.4 Bottom-Mounted Instrumentation Test Blocks ....................................................2-7

2.5 Simulated Flaw Types ........................................................................................2-9

2.5.1 Laboratory-Grown SCC (P12, P28, P29, P31, P32, and P38) ............. 2-10

2.5.2 Thermal Fatigue Cracks (P1, P4, and P5) ........................................... 2-14

2.5.3 Weld Solidification Cracks (P7, P37, and P41).................................... 2-14

2.5.4 Electrical Discharge Machined Notches (P1, P12, P42, P21, P22, 

P23, and P24) ..................................................................................... 2-15

2.5.5 Mechanical Fatigue Cracks (P30)........................................................ 2-15

2.5.6 Welding Defects (P37)......................................................................... 2-15

2.6 True-State Determination..................................................................................2-15

3 TECHNIQUE DESCRIPTIONS ......................................................................................3-1

3.1 Ultrasonic Techniques........................................................................................3-1

3.1.1 Through Transmission of Longitudinal Waves .......................................3-1

3.1.2 Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing ...........................................................3-3

3.1.3 Three-Dimensional Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique .................3-4

3.1.4 Phased Array Time Reversal Technique ...............................................3-6

3.1.5 Phased Array Asymmetrical Beam Time of Flight Diffraction.................3-7

3.1.6 Phased Array Twin Probe......................................................................3-9

3.1.7 Subharmonic Phased Array................................................................. 3-10

3.1.8 Large Amplitude Excitation Subharmonic ............................................ 3-13

3.1.9 Higher Harmonic Ultrasonic Technique ............................................... 3-13
viii

3.1.10 Nonlinear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy .................................... 3-15

3.1.11 Guided Ultrasonic Waves .................................................................... 3-16

3.1.12 Laser Ultrasound Visualization ............................................................ 3-18

3.1.13 Ultrasound Infrared Thermography...................................................... 3-18

3.2 Eddy Current Techniques................................................................................. 3-20

3.2.1 Exciter-Pickup Eddy Current Techniques ............................................ 3-20

3.2.2 Controlled Excitation ECT ................................................................... 3-21

3.2.3 Orthogonal Coil Array Eddy Current Technique................................... 3-23

3.2.4 Pulsed Excitation Eddy Current Technique.......................................... 3-23

3.3 Other Techniques............................................................................................. 3-24

3.3.1 Microwave Near Field Microscope....................................................... 3-24

3.3.2 Radiography Techniques..................................................................... 3-25

4 DATA OVERVIEW.........................................................................................................4-1

4.1 Data Reporting ...................................................................................................4-1

4.2 Records Collection Overview Summary .............................................................4-5

4.3 Procedure Type Categorization ..........................................................................4-5

4.4 Scoring Procedure Used for PARENT Open Testing..........................................4-5

4.5 Substitution for X1, X2, Y1, and Y2 Indication Fields..........................................4-9

4.6 Multiple Indications Associated with One Flaw ................................................. 4-11

4.7 Analysis of PARENT Open Round Robin Data................................................. 4-12

5 DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS ........................................................................................5-1

5.1 DMW Depth Sizing Results ................................................................................5-1

5.1.1 Depth Sizing Regression Plots for ADVPAUT Procedure Types............5-5

5.1.2 Depth Sizing Regression Plots for NLUT Procedure Types ...................5-9

5.1.3 Depth Sizing Regression Plots for PAUT Procedure Types................. 5-11

5.1.4 Depth Sizing Regression Plots for RT Procedure Types...................... 5-13

5.1.5 Depth Sizing Regression Plots for UIR Procedure Types ....................5-15

5.1.6 Depth Sizing Regression Plots for Conventional UT Procedure 

Types .................................................................................................. 5-17

5.2 DMW Length Sizing Results............................................................................. 5-19

5.2.1 Length Sizing Regression Plots for ADVPAUT Procedure Types ........ 5-21

5.2.2 Length Sizing Regression Plots for NLUT Procedure Types................ 5-22

5.2.3 Length Sizing Regression Plots for PAUT Procedure Types ............... 5-23

5.2.4 Length Sizing Regression Plots for Conventional UT Procedure 

Types .................................................................................................. 5-25

5.2.5 Length Sizing Regression Plots for ECT Procedure Types.................. 5-26

5.2.6 Length Sizing Regression Plots for MM Procedure Types ................... 5-27

5.3 BMI Data Analysis Results ............................................................................... 5-28

5.4 Indication Plots................................................................................................. 5-28
ix

6 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS .............................................................................................6-1

6.1 Comparison of ADVPAUT and PAUT Procedure Types .....................................6-1

6.2 Comparison of NLUT with PAUT and ADVPAUT Procedure Types....................6-7

6.3 Analysis of FB Test Block Results .................................................................... 6-11

6.4 Comparison of Linear and Sectorial PAUT by Team 122.................................. 6-15

6.5 UIR Results...................................................................................................... 6-17

6.6 RT, Conventional UT, and ECT Results ........................................................... 6-18

6.7 Analysis of Data Response Images from FB Test Blocks ................................. 6-21

6.7.1 Comparison of PAATOFD.29.2 Responses from P42, P30, and 

P32...................................................................................................... 6-21

6.7.2 Comparison of SAFT.17 Responses from P42, P30, and P32............. 6-24

6.7.3 PAUT.122.1 Responses from SCC Flaws............................................6-31

6.7.4 Team 22 SAFT and PATRT Responses from P29............................... 6-38

6.7.5 SAFT.17 Depth Measurement on P46................................................. 6-40

6.8 Procedures with Sparsely Populated Datasheets ............................................. 6-44

6.9 Discussion of Test Block Appropriateness........................................................ 6-48

6.10 Techniques to Consider for Blind Testing ......................................................... 6-49

7 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK ........................................................................7-1

8 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................8-1

APPENDIX A 11th ICNDE PAPERS .................................................................................. A-1

APPENDIX B SUMMARY TABLE OF OPEN NDE TECHNIQUES ................................... B-1

APPENDIX C SUMMARIES OF OPEN NDE TECHNIQUES............................................. C-1

APPENDIX D TEST BLOCK INFORMATION ................................................................... D-1

APPENDIX E TRUE-STATE SUMMARY .......................................................................... E-1

APPENDIX F DEPTH SIZING RESULTS.......................................................................... F-1

APPENDIX G LENGTH SIZING RESULTS ....................................................................... G-1

APPENDIX H INDICATION PLOTS .................................................................................. H-1

xi

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1 Organization Chart for Steering Committee and Task Groups .............................1-3

Figure 2.1 Coordinate System Definition for SBDMW Test Blocks P41 and 

LBDMW Test Block P37 ......................................................................................2-2

Figure 2.2 Coordinate System Definition for SBDMW Test Blocks P1...................................2-3

Figure 2.3 Coordinate System Definition for SBDMW Test Blocks P4...................................2-4

Figure 2.4 Coordinate System Definition and Illustration of LBDMW Partial 

Circumference Test Block P12.............................................................................2-5

Figure 2.5 Coordinate System Definition and Illustration of LBDMW Partial 

Circumference Test Blocks P23 and P24.............................................................2-5

Figure 2.6 Coordinate System Definition, Dimensions, and Illustrations of FB Test 

Blocks P28, P29, P30, P31, P32, P42, and P46 ..................................................2-6

Figure 2.7 Coordinate System Definition, Dimensions, and Illustrations of FB Test 

Block P38 ............................................................................................................2-6

Figure 2.8 Coordinate System Used for BMI Test Blocks: P5 and P7 ...................................2-7

Figure 2.9 Depiction of Configuration for BMI Test Blocks P21 and P22 with 

Coordinate System and Dimensions Labeled ......................................................2-8

Figure 2.10 Depiction of Configuration for BMI Test Blocks P5 and P7 with Labeled 

Dimensions..........................................................................................................2-9

Figure 2.11 Depiction of the Approach Used to Produce a Laboratory-Grown SCC in 

Test Block P12................................................................................................... 2-11

Figure 2.12 Flowchart of the Process Used to Produce a Laboratory-Grown 

PWSCC/IDSCC ................................................................................................. 2-11

Figure 2.13 Photograph and Depiction of FB Test Block Cut Out into Standard 

Fracture Mechanic Specimen from Reactor Pressure Vessel Material............... 2-12

Figure 2.14 Depiction of laboratory Autoclave Set-up for Growing SCC Flaws in FB 

Specimens under BWR and PWR Conditions.................................................... 2-12

Figure 2.15 Typical Micro-Fractographic Appearance of Laboratory-Grown SCC in 

FB Specimens ................................................................................................... 2-13

Figure 2.16 Uncracked Ligaments and Finger-Like Local Laboratory SCC Crack 

Growth in Destructively Analyzed FB Specimen ................................................ 2-14

Figure 3.1 Illustration of Mechanized Scanning Through-Transmission Longitudinal 

Pitch/Catch Technique.........................................................................................3-2

Figure 3.2 The C-scan Shows the Received Amplitude Color Coded (0% full 

screen height, FSH [white] to 100% FSH [red])....................................................3-2

Figure 3.3 Illustration of Time Delay Sequencing of Excitation of PAUT Transducer 

Elements to Achieve Beam Steering and Focusing..............................................3-3

Figure 3.4 PAUT Data Represented as A-scan (top left), C-scan (top right), B-scan 

(bottom left), and D scan (bottom right) ................................................................3-4
xii

Figure 3.5 2D Illustration of SAFT Correction for Focusing Distortion in Ultrasonic 

Inspections (left); B-scan Illustrating Distortion Caused by Beam 

Focusing Effects (right) ........................................................................................3-5

Figure 3.6 Implementation of 3D SAFT Using a Matrix Array Transducer. Individual 

elements are excited in sequence, while all elements “listen” for echoes.............3-6

Figure 3.7 Illustration of the Time Reversal Technique Concept for Focusing 

Ultrasonic Energy ................................................................................................3-7

Figure 3.8 Schematic Illustration of the PAATOFD Technique..............................................3-8

Figure 3.9 Data from Multiple Scan Angles and Depths of Focus are Synthesized 

in PAATOFD to Help Discriminate Crack Tip Signals from Noise.........................3-8

Figure 3.10 Schematic Illustration of the PATP Technique .....................................................3-9

Figure 3.11 Data from Multiple Scan Angles and Depths of Focus are Synthesized 

in PATP to Help Discriminate Crack Tip Signals from Noise .............................. 3-10

Figure 3.12 Illustration of the Crack Face “Clapping” Phenomena that is the Basis 

for Subharmonic Generation when Elastic Waves are Applied to Tight 

Cracks ............................................................................................................... 3-11

Figure 3.13 Illustration of SPACE Implementation in SAW Mode to Assess 

Detection and Length Sizing Capability and in Bulk Wave Mode to 

Assess Depth Sizing Capability ......................................................................... 3-12

Figure 3.14 Illustration of SHPA Data Analysis for Length and Depth Sizing of Flaws .......... 3-12

Figure 3.15 Depiction of the LASH Technique Implementation ............................................. 3-13

Figure 3.16 Illustration of Higher Harmonic Generation Because of the CAN 

Phenomenon ..................................................................................................... 3-14

Figure 3.17 Illustration of HHUT Implementation in PE (left) and TR (right) Modes............... 3-14

Figure 3.18 Resonance Frequency Shift in a Compact Tension Specimen in the 

Early Stage of Crack Initiation (top) and a Compact Tension Specimen 

with Crack Length of 7.0 mm (bottom) ............................................................... 3-15

Figure 3.19 Schematic Drawing of Possible Piezoelectric Sensor Configuration................... 3-16

Figure 3.20 Illustration of GUW Formation and Propagation in Test Material........................ 3-16

Figure 3.21 Guided Wave Dispersion Curves on Cylindrical Coordinate: (a) phase 

velocity dispersion curve; (b) group velocity dispersion curve ............................ 3-17

Figure 3.22 Schematic of the Envisioned LUV System ......................................................... 3-18

Figure 3.23 Illustration of the UIR Concept ........................................................................... 3-19

Figure 3.24 UIR Image of a Test Specimen with Crack......................................................... 3-19

Figure 3.25 Depiction of a Single Coil Eddy Current Probe with an Alternating 

Current Excitation, Induced Magnetic Fields, and Induced Eddy 

Currents. Disturbance of eddy current flow can be caused by existence 

of a defect.......................................................................................................... 3-21

Figure 3.26 Schematic Illustration of an Eddy Current Probe with Separate Coils for 

Field Excitation and for Signal Detection............................................................ 3-21
xiii

Figure 3.27 Illustration Showing that the Phase Response of CEECT has a 

Significant Correlation to Flaw Depth over a Large Range of Flaw Depth 

Values, Including for Deep Cracks..................................................................... 3-22

Figure 3.28 Illustration of the CEECT Probe for Measuring the Depth of Flaws .................... 3-22

Figure 3.29 Illustration of Orthogonal Coil Pair and Relative Orientation to Surface 

Crack Profiles .................................................................................................... 3-23

Figure 3.30 Comparison of Pulsed Excitation for PECT (left) to Continuous SineWave Excitation for Conventional ECT (right) and Illustration of the 

Frequency Spectrum Associated with Each Type of Excitation Source.............. 3-24

Figure 3.31 Illustration of the MM Technique for Crack Detection......................................... 3-25

Figure 3.32 Illustration of a Radiographic Examination and Interaction of Source Xrays with Density Discontinuities such as Flaws................................................. 3-26

Figure 3.33 Illustration Depicting the Sensitivity of Conventional Radiography Signal

to Planar Flaw Orientation ................................................................................. 3-27

Figure 4.1 Technique Datasheets for Techniques ET400Hz and TOFD.Ax for 

Fictitious Inspection 12.P89.1 ..............................................................................4-3

Figure 4.2 Technique Datasheet for Technique TOFD.Circ for Fictitious Inspection 

12.P89.1 ..............................................................................................................4-4

Figure 4.3 Inspection Summary Datasheet for Fictitious Inspection 12.P89.1.......................4-4

Figure 4.4 Diagram Illustrating How Procedures are Classified by Procedure Types 

for Data Analysis Purposes..................................................................................4-8

Figure 4.5 Illustration of Tolerance (δX and δY) Applied Flaw True-State (in red) 

Dimensions for the Purpose of Scoring in PARENT.............................................4-9

Figure 4.6 Depiction of Indication Plot Illustrating 2-D Representation of Test 

Block. The red filled rectangles represent the true-state (actual flaws), 

while red empty rectangles surrounding the flaws depict the scoring 

tolerance. Indications are shown as black empty rectangles................................4-9

Figure 4.7 Inspection Summary Datasheet for Inspection of Test block P1 by 

Procedure LASH.18 showing unpopulated X1, X2, Y1 and Y2 fields ................. 4-10

Figure 4.8 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view).................................................................. 4-11

Figure 4.9 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view).................................................................. 4-11

Figure 4.10 Indication Plot Illustrating Two Indications Intersecting the Region 

Bounded by the Tolerance Box.......................................................................... 4-12

Figure 4.11 Illustration of Tolerance Divided Between Flaw and Multiple Indications 

Intersecting the Region Bounded by the Flaw Tolerance Box ............................ 4-12

Figure 4.12 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27 Inspection of Test Block P1 .................. 4-14

Figure 4.13 Length Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ................................................ 4-14
xiv

Figure 4.14 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.131.1 on 

SBDMW Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB 

test blocks) ........................................................................................................ 4-15

Figure 4.15 Depth Sizing Regression for NLUT Procedures on SBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)............................. 4-16

Figure 4.16 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure HHUT.30 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)............ 4-16

Figure 5.1 Depth Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)....................5-6

Figure 5.2 Depth Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)..................5-6

Figure 5.3 Depth Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)..............................................................5-7

Figure 5.4 Depth Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access) ...............................................................5-7

Figure 5.5 Depth Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ..................................................5-8

Figure 5.6 Depth Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)....................................................5-8

Figure 5.7 Depth Sizing Regression for NLUT Procedures on SBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)...............................5-9

Figure 5.8 Depth Sizing Regression for NLUT Procedures on SBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)........................... 5-10

Figure 5.9 Depth Sizing Regression for NLUT Procedures on FB Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ............................................................... 5-10

Figure 5.10 Depth Sizing Regression for PAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)............................. 5-11

Figure 5.11 Depth Sizing Regression for PAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)........................... 5-12

Figure 5.12 Depth Sizing Regression for PAUT Procedures on FB Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ............................................................... 5-12

Figure 5.13 Depth Sizing Regression for PAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access) ............................................................. 5-13

Figure 5.14 Depth Sizing Regression for RT Procedures on SBDMW Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)................................. 5-14

Figure 5.15 Depth Sizing Regression for RT Procedures on SBDMW Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)............................... 5-14

Figure 5.16 Depth Sizing Regression for RT Procedures on FB Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ............................................................... 5-15

Figure 5.17 Depth Sizing Regression for UIR Procedures on SBDMW Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)................................. 5-16
xv 

Figure 5.18 Depth Sizing Regression for UIR Procedures on FB Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ............................................................... 5-16

Figure 5.19 Depth Sizing Regression for Conventional UT Procedures on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks).......... 5-17

Figure 5.20 Depth Sizing Regression for Conventional UT Procedures on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test 

blocks)............................................................................................................... 5-18

Figure 5.21 Depth Sizing Regression for Conventional UT Procedures on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ................................................ 5-18

Figure 5.22 Length Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ................................................ 5-21

Figure 5.23 Length Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ................................................ 5-22

Figure 5.24 Length Sizing Regression for NLUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ................................................ 5-23

Figure 5.25 Length Sizing Regression for PAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ................................................ 5-24

Figure 5.26 Length Sizing Regression for PAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ................................................ 5-24

Figure 5.27 Length Sizing Regression for PAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access).................................................. 5-25

Figure 5.28 Length Sizing Regression for Conventional UT Procedures on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ........................................ 5-25

Figure 5.29 Length Sizing Regression for ECT Procedures on SBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access) ............................................................. 5-26

Figure 5.30 Length Sizing Regression for ECT Procedures on LBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access) ............................................................. 5-27

Figure 5.31 Length Sizing Regression for MM Procedures on LBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access) ............................................................. 5-27

Figure 6.1 Depth Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)..................6-2

Figure 6.2 Depth Sizing Regression for PAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks).............................6-3

Figure 6.3 Depth Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)..............................................................6-3

Figure 6.4 Depth Sizing Regression for PAUT Procedures on FB Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) .................................................................6-4

Figure 6.5 Length Sizing Regression for PAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ..................................................6-6

Figure 6.6 Length Sizing Regression for ADVPAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) ..................................................6-7
xvi

Figure 6.7 Depth Sizing Regression Plot for HHUT.27.1 Applied to SBDMW Test 

Blocks (w/o FB test blocks) with O.D. Access ......................................................6-8

Figure 6.8 Depth Sizing Regression Plot for SHPA.6.1 Applied to SBDMW Test 

Blocks (w/o FB test blocks) with O.D. Access ......................................................6-9

Figure 6.9 Depth Sizing Regression Plot for LASH.18 Applied to SBDMW Test 

Blocks (w/o FB test blocks) with O.D. Access ......................................................6-9

Figure 6.10 Depth Sizing Regression Plot for HHUT.27.2 Applied to FB Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access ............................................................................................... 6-10

Figure 6.11 Depth Sizing Regression Plot for SHPA.6.3 Applied to FB Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access ............................................................................................... 6-10

Figure 6.12 Depth Sizing Regression Plot for LASH.18 Applied to FB Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access ............................................................................................... 6-11

Figure 6.13 Depth Sizing Regression for Procedure PAUT.122.1 (Linear) for FB 

Test Blocks by O.D. Access............................................................................... 6-16

Figure 6.14 Depth Sizing Regression for Procedure PAUT.122.2 (Sectorial) FB Test 

Blocks by O.D. Access....................................................................................... 6-16

Figure 6.15 UIR Image of FB Test Block P29 (view from side surface)................................. 6-17

Figure 6.16 UIR Image of FB Test Block P29 (view from side surface)................................. 6-17

Figure 6.17 UIR Image of FB Test Block P29 (view of surface from which crack 

initiates) ............................................................................................................. 6-17

Figure 6.18 Length Sizing Regression Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to 

SBDMW Test Blocks with I.D. Access ............................................................... 6-19

Figure 6.19 Length Sizing Regression Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to 

SBDMW Test Blocks with I.D. Access ............................................................... 6-20

Figure 6.20 Length Sizing Regression Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to 

LBDMW Test Blocks with I.D. Access................................................................ 6-20

Figure 6.21 PAATOFD.29.2 Inspection of P42 (EDM) from O.D. .......................................... 6-21

Figure 6.22 PAATOFD.29.2 Inspection of P42 (EDM) from I.D............................................. 6-22

Figure 6.23 PAATOFD.29.2 Inspection of P30 (MFC) from O.D. .......................................... 6-22

Figure 6.24 PAATOFD.29.2 Inspection of P30 (MFC) from I.D. ............................................ 6-23

Figure 6.25 PAATOFD.29.2 Inspection of P32 (SCC) from O.D. .......................................... 6-23

Figure 6.26 PAATOFD.29.2 Inspection of P32 (SCC) from I.D. ............................................ 6-24

Figure 6.27 Data Images of Responses Obtained by SAFT-17 on Test Block P42 

with EDM Notch................................................................................................. 6-25

Figure 6.28 Data Images of Responses Obtained by SAFT-17 on Test Block P30 

with MFC Flaw................................................................................................... 6-26

Figure 6.29 Data Images of Responses Obtained by SAFT-17 on Test Block P32 

with SCC Flaw ................................................................................................... 6-27

Figure 6.30 Indication Depth Profile Obtained by SAFT-17 on Test Block P42 with 

EDM Notch ........................................................................................................ 6-28
xvii

Figure 6.31 Indication Depth Profile Obtained by SAFT-17 on Test Block P30 with 

MFC Flaw .......................................................................................................... 6-29

Figure 6.32 Indication Depth Profile Obtained by SAFT-17 on Test Block P32 with 

SCC Flaw .......................................................................................................... 6-30

Figure 6.33 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view).................................................................. 6-30

Figure 6.34 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view).................................................................. 6-31

Figure 6.35 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view).................................................................. 6-31

Figure 6.36 Data Image Response for PAUT.122.1 Inspection of SCC Flaw in P28 

Viewed from the Right Side of Weld. The Inspection was performed by 

linear scanning with longitudinal wave modes from TRL probe at 60°. 

Two possible crack tip signals are highlighted by arrows in the image. .............. 6-32

Figure 6.37 Data Image Response for PAUT.122.1 Inspection of SCC Flaw in P28 

Viewed from the Right Side of Weld. The Inspection was performed by 

linear scanning with longitudinal wave modes from TRL probe at 50°. 

The likely crack tip signal is identified with the white circle................................. 6-33

Figure 6.38 Data Image Response for PAUT.122.1 Inspection of SCC Flaw in P32 

Viewed from the Right Side of Weld. The inspection was performed by 

linear scanning with longitudinal wave modes from TRL probe at 50°. 

The white circle indicates that it is difficult to separate the tip response 

from noise.......................................................................................................... 6-34

Figure 6.39 Data Image Response for PAUT.122.1 Inspection of SCC Flaw in P32 

Viewed from the Left Side of Weld. The inspection was performed by 

linear scanning with longitudinal wave modes from TRL probe at 55°. 

The white arrow highlights a weak signal considered to be the crack tip 

response............................................................................................................ 6-35

Figure 6.40 Data Image Response for PAUT.122.1 Inspection of SCC Flaw in P32 

Viewed from the Left Side of Weld. The inspection was performed by 

linear scanning with longitudinal wave modes from TRL probe at 45°. 

The white circle highlights the signal considered to be the crack tip 

response............................................................................................................ 6-36

Figure 6.41 Data Image Response for PAUT.122.1 Inspection of MFC Flaw in P30 

Viewed from the Left Side of Weld. The inspection was performed by 

linear scanning with longitudinal wave modes from TRL Probe at 50°. 

The white circle highlights the signal considered to be the tip response............. 6-37

Figure 6.42 Data Image Response for PAUT.122.1 Inspection of EDM Notch in P42 

Viewed from the Right Side of Weld. The inspection was performed by 

linear scanning with longitudinal wave modes from TRL probe at 50°. 

The white circle highlights the signal considered to be the tip response............. 6-38

Figure 6.43 Image of Response for Team 22 SAFT Response with L-waves ....................... 6-39
xviii

Figure 6.44 Image of Response for Team 22 SAFT Response with S-waves ....................... 6-39

Figure 6.45 Image of Response for Team 22 PATRT Response with L-waves ..................... 6-39

Figure 6.46 Image of Response for Team 22 PATRT Response with S-waves..................... 6-40

Figure 6.47 Coordinate System Definition, Dimensions, and Illustrations of FB Test 

Block P46 .......................................................................................................... 6-40

Figure 6.48 Data Images of Responses Obtained by SAFT-17 on Test Block P46 

from y-position 103.6 mm .................................................................................. 6-41

Figure 6.49 Indication Depth Profile Obtained by SAFT-17 on Test Block P46 from 

y-position 103.6 mm........................................................................................... 6-42

Figure 6.50 Data Images of Responses Obtained by SAFT-17 on Test Block P46 

from y-position 120 mm ..................................................................................... 6-43

Figure 6.51 Indication Depth Profile Obtained by SAFT-17 on Test Block P46 from 

y-position 120 mm ............................................................................................. 6-44

Figure 6.52 Example of Datasheet Submission for Procedures MM.28.1 and 

MM.28.2 with Non-Numerical Data in X, Y, and Z Fields for Indications............. 6-45

Figure 6.53 Example of Datasheet Submission for Procedure GUW.21 with Blank X, 

Y, and Z Fields for Indications............................................................................ 6-46

Figure 6.54 Example of Datasheet Submission for Procedures PECT.11 with NonNumerical Data in X, Y, and Z Fields for Indications .......................................... 6-47

Figure 6.55 Example of Datasheet Submission for Procedures NRUS.11 with NonNumerical Data in X, Y, and Z Fields for Indications .......................................... 6-48
xix

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1 Summary of Members of the PARENT Steering Committee, NDE Task 

Group, Atlas Task Group, and Invigilator/DAG.....................................................1-4

Table 2.1 Summary of Categories into which Test Blocks for Open Testing are 

Classified.............................................................................................................2-1

Table 2.2 Summary of Dimensions for LBDMW Full Circumference Test Blocks.................2-2

Table 2.3 Summary of Dimensions for SBDMW Full Circumference Test Blocks ................2-3

Table 2.4 Summary of Dimensions for LBDMW Partial Circumference Test Blocks.............2-5

Table 2.5 Tabulation of BMI Test Block P5 and P7 Dimensions ..........................................2-9

Table 2.6 Summary of Flaw Simulation Methods Used for Each Test Block and 

Quantities of Each Type of Simulated Flaw........................................................ 2-10

Table 4.1 Definitions of Data Fields for “Technique Datasheets” and “Inspection 

Summary Datasheets” .........................................................................................4-2

Table 4.2 Number of Inspection Summary Records by Procedure and Test Block 

Type ....................................................................................................................4-6

Table 4.3 Number of Inspection Summary Records for Procedure Types and 

Block Types by Access........................................................................................4-7

Table 4.4 Summary of Number of Flaw Observations (NOBS) for Different Flaw 

Types in Each Test Block Type............................................................................4-7

Table 4.5 Summary of Number of Flaw Observations (NOBS) by Flaw Orientation 

in Each Test Block Type ......................................................................................4-7

Table 5.1 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test 

Blocks with O.D. Access w/ FB Test Blocks.........................................................5-1

Table 5.2 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test 

Blocks with O.D. Access w/o FB Test Blocks.......................................................5-2

Table 5.3 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test 

Blocks with O.D. Access (only FB test blocks) .....................................................5-2

Table 5.4 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test 

Blocks with I.D. Access (only FB test blocks).......................................................5-2

Table 5.5 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test 

Blocks with O.D. Access ......................................................................................5-2

Table 5.6 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test 

Blocks with I.D. Access........................................................................................5-3

Table 5.7 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access w/ FB Test Blocks ....................................................................5-3

Table 5.8 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access w/o FB Test Blocks ..................................................................5-4

Table 5.9 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access (only FB blocks) .......................................................................5-4
xx 

Table 5.10 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

with I.D. Access (only FB test blocks) ..................................................................5-5

Table 5.11 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access .................................................................................................5-5

Table 5.12 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with I.D. Access ...................................................................................................5-5

Table 5.13 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test 

Blocks with O.D. Access .................................................................................... 5-19

Table 5.14 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test 

Blocks with I.D. Access...................................................................................... 5-19

Table 5.15 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test 

Blocks with O.D. Access .................................................................................... 5-19

Table 5.16 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test 

Blocks with I.D. Access...................................................................................... 5-20

Table 5.17 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access ............................................................................................... 5-20

Table 5.18 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

with I.D. Access ................................................................................................. 5-20

Table 5.19 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access ............................................................................................... 5-20

Table 5.20 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with I.D. Access ................................................................................................. 5-21

Table 5.21 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to BMI Test Blocks with 

J-Groove Weld Surface Access ......................................................................... 5-28

Table 6.1 Summary of Depth Sizing RMSEs for ADVPAUT and PAUT Techniques 

Applied to SBDMW and LBDMW Test Blocks with O.D. and I.D. Access.............6-2

Table 6.2 Summary of Depth Sizing Performances for ADVPAUT Procedure 

Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks with O.D. Access w/o FB Test 

Blocks ..................................................................................................................6-5

Table 6.3 Summary of Depth Sizing Performances for ADVPAUT Procedure 

Types Applied to FB Test Blocks with O.D. Access .............................................6-5

Table 6.4 Summary of Depth Sizing Performances for PAUT Procedure Types 

Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks with O.D. Access w/o FB Test Blocks................6-5

Table 6.5 Summary of Depth Sizing Performances for PAUT Procedure Types 

Applied to FB Test Blocks with O.D. Access ........................................................6-5

Table 6.6 Summary of Length Sizing RMSEs for ADVPAUT and PAUT 

Techniques Applied to SBDMW and LBDMW Test Blocks with O.D. 

Access .................................................................................................................6-6

Table 6.7 Summary of Length Sizing Performances for ADVPAUT Procedure 

Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks with O.D. Access w/o FB Test 

Blocks..................................................................................................................6-6
xxi

Table 6.8 Summary of Length Sizing Performances for PAUT Procedure Types 

Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks with O.D. Access w/o FB Test Blocks................6-6

Table 6.9 Comparison of Depth Sizing Performances for FB Test Blocks.......................... 6-12

Table 6.10 Depth Sizing Results for P28 by Procedure Type for I.D. Access ...................... 6-12

Table 6.11 Depth Sizing Results for P29 by Procedure Type for I.D. Access ...................... 6-12

Table 6.12 Depth Sizing Results for P30 by Procedure Type for I.D. Access ...................... 6-12

Table 6.13 Depth Sizing Results for P31 by Procedure Type for I.D. Access ...................... 6-12

Table 6.14 Depth Sizing Results for P32 by Procedure Type for I.D. Access ...................... 6-13

Table 6.15 Depth Sizing Results for P38 by Procedure Type for I.D. Access ...................... 6-13

Table 6.16 Depth Sizing Results for P42 by Procedure Type for I.D. Access ...................... 6-13

Table 6.17 Depth Sizing Results for P28 by Procedure Type for O.D. Access..................... 6-13

Table 6.18 Depth Sizing Results for P29 by Procedure Type for O.D. Access..................... 6-13

Table 6.19 Depth Sizing Results for P30 by Procedure Type for O.D. Access..................... 6-14

Table 6.20 Depth Sizing Results for P31 by Procedure Type for O.D. Access..................... 6-14

Table 6.21 Depth Sizing Results for P32 by Procedure Type for O.D. Access..................... 6-14

Table 6.22 Depth Sizing Results for P38 by Procedure Type for O.D. Access..................... 6-15

Table 6.23 Depth Sizing Results for P42 by Procedure Type for O.D. Access..................... 6-15

Table 6.24 Summary of Depth Sizing Performances for Procedures PAUT.122.1 

and PAUT.122.2 ................................................................................................ 6-15

xxiii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has established the Program to Assess the 

Reliability of Emerging Nondestructive Techniques (PARENT) whose goal is to investigate the 

performance of current emerging and perspective novel nondestructive examination (NDE) 

procedures and techniques to find flaws in nickel-alloy welds and base materials. This was

performed by conducting a series of open and blind international round-robin tests on a set of 

piping components that include large-bore dissimilar metal welds (LBDMW), small-bore 

dissimilar metal welds (SBDMW), and bottom-mounted instrumentation (BMI) penetration welds. 

In February 2012, the NRC entered into agreements with VTT Technical Research Centre of 

Finland, Nuclear Regulation Authority of Japan (NRA), Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS), 

Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM), and Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate 

(ENSI) to establish PARENT to conduct a series of round-robin tests on SBDMWs, BMIs, and 

LBDMWs. PARENT activities were split into blind testing and open testing activities. Blind 

testing was performed in PARENT to quantitatively estimate the performance of established 

NDE methods in the nuclear power industry and the results from blind testing are documented 

in another report that is under preparation. This report is focused on documenting the open

testing activity and results.

Open testing was performed on a set of test blocks with true-state information that was open 

and provided to teams performing the testing. The objective of open testing was to evaluate the 

performance of emerging NDE techniques, which are still in relatively early stages of 

development. The performances of emerging NDE techniques were evaluated based on 

quantitative sizing analyses and qualitative analysis of data response images. The motivation 

for evaluating emerging NDE techniques includes the desire to identify more effective methods 

for detecting and characterizing rapidly growing forms of degradation, such as primary water 

stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) and interdendritic stress corrosion cracking (IDSCC). 

Inspections with emerging NDE techniques were carried out by a variety of organizations 

including universities, industry organizations, and government research organizations. 

This report describes open testing performed in PARENT including a description of the test

blocks used, an overview of the NDE techniques applied, and analysis of the data. Data were 

collected for procedures incorporating novel NDE techniques on SBDMW, LBDMW, and BMI 

test blocks. There were 226 inspections performed on 4 BMI test blocks, 4 LBDMW test blocks, 

and 11 SBDMW test blocks. Some significant conclusions drawn for the results documented in 

this report include:

• A general trend was observed for oversizing shallow flaws and undersizing deep flaws with

the exception of advanced phased array ultrasonic testing (ADVPAUT) procedure types and

non-linear ultrasonic testing (NLUT) procedure types based on sub-harmonic techniques,

which exhibit a more consistent error over the range of flaw depths considered.

• NLUT procedures incorporating sub-harmonic techniques exhibited better depth sizing

performance than NLUT procedures incorporating higher harmonic techniques based on

overall root mean square error (RMSE) and regression analysis.

• ADVPAUT procedure types did not exhibit better overall depth sizing accuracy than phased

array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) procedure types in this study based on RMSE.
xxiv

• Overall, NLUT procedure types did not exhibit better overall depth sizing accuracy in

comparison to ADVPAUT and PAUT procedure types based on RMSE.

• PAUT procedures exhibited a more consistent length sizing error over the range of flaw

lengths considered for SBDMW test blocks in comparison to ADVPAUT, which exhibited a

tendency to oversize short flaws and undersize long flaws.

• Better depth sizing performance was observed on flat bar (FB) test blocks (most with

laboratory-grown SCC flaws) for ADVPAUT, NLUT, and conventional UT procedure types in

comparison to SBDMW test blocks (with weld solidification cracks). PAUT procedure types

exhibited better depth sizing performance on SBDMW test blocks in comparison to FB test

blocks.

• Eddy current testing (ECT) exhibits a more consistent length sizing error over the range of

flaw lengths considered for SBDMW test blocks in comparison to ”Advanced” ECT

procedures (AECT.33), which tend to oversize short flaws and undersize long flaws.

• Depth sizing data for ultrasound infrared thermography (UIR) was obtained in a way that

would not be practical in a field environment. However, the results indicated a capability for

flaw detection and flaw length sizing.

• Data response images for ADVPAUT techniques illustrate that SCC flaws result in weaker

crack tip responses in comparison to mechanical fatigue crack (MFC) and electro-discharge

machine (EDM) notch flaws.

• Data response images for PAUT techniques illustrate that identifying crack tip signals with

PAUT can be difficult and that crack tip signal identification by image pattern analysis is, in

part, a subjective determination.

• Data response images for ADVPAUT and PAUT techniques illustrate difficulty in

distinguishing noise from crack tip responses.

• Tip diffraction signals with low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were easier to detect under open

testing conditions with flaw information provided to test participants. Detecting tip diffraction

signals with low SNR under blind test conditions will be more challenging.

Based on the results documented in this report and the conclusions outlined above, the 

following recommendations can be made:

• Blind testing of some of the open test procedures described in this report could be

conducted based on the open testing results to obtain an estimate of detection performance

and more realistic estimates of sizing performance. The specific techniques for which blind

testing is recommended are summarized below:

− ADVPAUT

○ PAATOFD.29.0

○ PAATOFD.29.1

○ PAATOFD.29.2

○ PAATOFD.29.3

○ PATP.29
xxv 

○ PATRT.22

○ SAFT.17

− NLUT

○ SHPA.6.1

○ SHPA.6.2

○ SHPA.6.3

○ LASH.18

○ HHUT.27.1

○ HHUT.27.2

○ HHUT.30

− ECT

○ ECT.7

○ AECT.33

○ ECT.6

• Procedures UIR.20 and LUV.170 incorporated stand-off inspection techniques that have the 

potential for deployment during reactor operation. Evaluation of these procedures should be 

based on test pieces subject to relevant field conditions. 

• NLUT procedure types, which incorporated techniques that are sensitive to degradation in

early stages (i.e., before large cracks form), should be evaluated using test blocks with 

simulated early degradation to better evaluate their potential.

• Procedure GUW.21 had difficulty detecting flaws due to the geometrical limitations of the 

test blocks used in PARENT. Future efforts to evaluate GUW testing should ensure the 

dimensions of the test blocks are sufficient so that boundaries do not significantly influence 

the response.

xxvii 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

There have been significant contributions made by a number of people and organizations to

accomplish this work. The authors express appreciation to Iouri Prokofiev, Stephen Cumblidge, 

and Aladar Csontos, of the NRC for their leadership in helping to organize and start the Program 

to Assess the Reliability of Emerging Nondestructive Techniques (PARENT) program; to David 

Rudland of the NRC for his continued commitment to PARENT; to Stephen Cumblidge for 

continuing to provide technical and philosophical input to PARENT; and to Iouri Prokofiev for his 

continuous leadership of PARENT. Brett Braatz was the original Project Manager for PARENT 

and was responsible for the complex task of organizing and executing test block shipping and 

data collection. The authors also acknowledge the tireless efforts of the PARENT invigilators—

Tommy Zetterwall (Europe), Ichiro Komura (Japan), and Kyung-cho Kim (South Korea)—who

reviewed inspection procedures and monitored the work of inspection teams in their respective 

regions. The author also acknowledges contributions to the open testing portion of PARENT 

from the following organizations:

 Organizations from Japan

 Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA)

 Ultrasonic Materials Diagnosis Laboratory (UMDL)

 Institute of Nuclear Safety System, Incorporated (INSS)

 Tohoku University 

 Nagoya University 

 Toyama University

 Japan Power Engineering and Inspection Corporation (JAPEIC)

 Organizations from Europe

 Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM)

 Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI)

 Swedish Qualification Center (SQC)

 Swiss Association for Technical Inspections, Nuclear Inspectorate (SVTI)

 VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd.

 Alstom Power Products [Switzerland]

 Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA)

 Chalmers Institute of Technology [Sweden]

 Paul Scherer Institute (PSI) [Switzerland]

 Organizations from Korea

 Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS)

 Korea Plant Service KPS

 Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI)

 Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS)

 Pusan National University (PNU)

 Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU)

 Hanyangg University (HYU)

 Organizations from the USA

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
xxviii 

 IHI Southwest Technologies and Southwest Research Institute (SwRI)

 AlphaSense

 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

Finally, the authors thank Ms. Kay Hass for typing and editing versions and revisions of this 

document. 
xxix

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2D two-dimensional 

3D three-dimensional

ADVPAUT advanced phased array ultrasonic testing

AECT advanced ECT technique 

BMI bottom-mounted instrumentation

BWR boiling water reactor

CAN contact acoustic nonlinearity 

CCD charge coupled device

CEECT controlled excitation eddy current technique 

CT computed tomography 

DMW dissimilar metal weld

ECT eddy current techniques

EDM electrical discharge machining 

EPRI Electric Power Research Institute

FB flat bar

FFT Fast Fourier Transform 

FSH full screen height

GUW guided ultrasonic waves 

HHUT higher harmonic ultrasonic technique

I.D. inner diameter

ID identification

IGSCC intergranular stress corrosion cracking 

IQI image quality indicators 

IR infrared 

ISI inservice inspection 

LASH large amplitude excitation subharmonic UT

LBDMW large bore dissimilar metal weld

LOB lack of bond 

LOF lack of fusion 

LUV laser ultrasound visualization 

MA Method Multi-angle Synthesis Method 

MFC mechanical fatigue crack 

MM microwave near-field microscopy 

NDE nondestructive examination 
xxx 

NLUT nonlinear ultrasonic testing

NOBS number of observations

NRUS nonlinear resonant ultrasound spectroscopy 

O.D. outer diameter

OCECT orthogonal coil eddy current technique 

PA phased array

PAATOFD phased array asymmetrical beam time-of-flight diffraction 

PARENT Program to Assess the Reliability of Emerging Nondestructive 

Techniques

PATP phased array twin probe 

PAUT phased-array ultrasonic techniques 

PC pitch/catch 

PE pulse-echo 

PECT pulsed excitation eddy current technique 

photo-emf photo electromotive force 

PINC Program for the Inspection of Nickel Alloy Components

POD probability of detection

PWR pressurized water reactor 

PWSCC primary water stress corrosion cracking

PZT piezoelectric transducer 

RMSE root mean square error

SAFT synthetic aperture focusing technique 

SAW surface acoustic waves 

SBDMW small bore dissimilar metal weld

SC weld solidification cracks

SCC stress corrosion cracking

SHPA subharmonic phased array 

SI slag inclusion 

SPACE subharmonic phased array for crack evaluation 

stdev standard deviation

TFC thermal fatigue cracks 

TOFD time-of-flight diffraction 

TR transmit-receive 

TRL transmit-receive longitudinal

PATRT phased array time reversal technique 

UIR ultrasound infrared thermography 

w/ with

w/o without
xxxi 

Definitions

Bottom-mounted 

instrumentation (BMI) 

A cylindrical penetration in the bottom head of a nuclear reactor 

pressure vessel, into which a tube is welded. Typical inside 

diameters are a few centimeters. 

Dendrite weld grain (columnar or tree-like)

Dissimilar metal weld 

(DMW)

Weldments joining components made of different alloys. In the 

context of PINC and PARENT, refers primarily to nozzle welds.

Heat-affected zone a volume of base metal, adjacent to the fusion zone, changed by 

the heat of welding

Interdendritic between the tree-like grains, such as can form in castings or 

weld metal

Intergranular between the metal crystals rather than through them

J-groove weld a weld with profile shaped as the letter “J,” the seal weld of a 

CRDM or BMI penetration

Lack of fusion missing metallic bond either between the sidewall of a weld with 

the base metal or between weld passes (inter-run)

Partial penetration weld the weld preformed to eliminate leakage paths, also called a seal 

weld

Primary water stress 

corrosion cracking 

(PWSCC)

The intergranular or interdendritic cracking of nickel-base alloys 

that occurs in service and originates from the surfaces of a 

component that are wetted by the primary water of a pressurized 

water reactor (PWR)

Program for the 

Inspection of Nickel-Alloy 

Components (PINC)

An international cooperative research program, The purpose of 

PINC is to assess the capabilities of current and emerging NDE 

techniques to detect and size flaws associated with PWSCC in 

nuclear reactors. This information tool is the definitive source of 

information on PINC.

Round-robin test (RRT) a test performed independently several times (usually at multiple 

testing facilities)

APPENDIX D

–

TEST BLOCK INFORMATION

D-1

APPENDIX D

TEST BLOCK INFORMATION

D.1 BMI Test Blocks ..........................................................................................................D-1

D.2 SBDMW Test Blocks...................................................................................................D-3

D.3 LBDMW Test Blocks ................................................................................................. D-14

D.1 BMI Test Blocks

Figure D.1 BMI Test Block P21
D-2

Figure D.2 BMI Test Block P22

Figure D.3 BMI Test Block P5
D-3

Figure D.4 BMI Test Block P7

D.2 SBDMW Test Blocks

Figure D.5 SBDMW Test Block P1
D-4

Figure D.6 SBDMW Test Block P4
D-5

Figure D.7 SBDMW Test Block P41
D-6

Figure D.8 SBDMW Test Block P28
D-7

Figure D.9 SBDMW Test Block P29
D-8

Figure D.10 SBDMW Test Block P30
D-9

Figure D.11 SBDMW Test Block P31
D-10

Figure D.12 SBDMW Test Block P32
D-11

Figure D.13 SBDMW Test Block P38
D-12

Figure D.14 SBDMW Test Block P42
D-13

Figure D.15 SBDMW Test Block P46
D-14

D.3 LBDMW Test Blocks

Figure D.16 LBDMW Test Block P12

Figure D.17 LBDMW Test Block P23
D-15

Figure D.18 LBDMW Test Block P24

Figure D.19 LBDMW Test Block P37

APPENDIX E

–

TRUE-STATE SUMMARY

E-1 

APPENDIX E

TRUE-STATE SUMMARY

E.1 True States for Open BMI Test Blocks ......................................................................E-2

E.2 True States for Open SBDMW Test Blocks...............................................................E-3

E.3 True States for Open Flat Bar Test Blocks................................................................E-4

E.4 True States for Open LBDMW Test Blocks ...............................................................E-5
E

-2

E.1 True States for Open BMI Test Blocks

Flaw ID

Test 

Block ID u1 u2 u3 u4 u5 u6 Type Orientation Depth Length

Surface 

Breaking

P5.1 P5 9.5 18.9 34 37 0 3 TFC CA 3 6 YesP5.2 P5 149.3 157.1 39.6 40.9 0 2 TFC C 2 5 YesP5.3 P5 287.3 291.7 30.9 37.6 0 1 TFC CA 1 7 YesP21.1 P21 0 0 29.1 31.1 0 0.5 EDM A 0.5 2 YesP21.2 P21 270 270 29.1 31.1 0 2 EDM A 2 2 YesP21.3 P21 180 180 27.6 32.6 0 2 EDM A 2 5 YesP21.4 P21 90 90 25.1 35.1 0 10 EDM A 10 10 YesP22.1 P22 356.2 3.8 29.8 30.1 0 0.5 EDM C 0.5 4 YesP22.2 P22 266.2 273.8 28.9 30.1 0 2 EDM C 2 4 YesP22.3 P22 170.5 189.5 27.2 30.1 0 5 EDM C 5 10 YesP22.4 P22 71.6 108.4 24.3 30.1 0 10 EDM CA 10 17 YesP7.1 P7 64.3 65.2 42.4 50.5 0 7 SC A 7 8 YesP7.2 P7 103.7 103.8 41.9 47.7 0 1 SC A 1 6 YesP7.3 P7 165 165 33 36 0 6 SC A 6 3 YesP7.4 P7 283 287 42 50 0 3 SC CA 3 8 YesEDM = electrical discharge machining A = axialSC = weld solidification crack C = circumferentialTFC = thermal fatigue crack CA = circumferential + axial
E

-3

E.2 True States for Open SBDMW Test Blocks

Flaw ID

Test 

Block ID u1 u2 u3 u4 u5 u6 Type Orientation Depth Length

Surface 

Breaking

P41.1 P41 61 87 −10 −10 26 32 SC C 6 20 YesP41.2 P41 144 144 −20 0 26 32 SC A 6 20 YesP41.3 P41 202 202 −20 0 15 32 SC A 17 20 YesP41.4 P41 260 324 −8 −8 15 32 SC C 17 50 YesP41.5 P41 383 383 −20 0 26 32 SC A 6 20 YesP41.6 P41 441 467 −10 −10 26 32 SC C 6 20 YesP41.7 P41 524 524 −19 1 6 32 SC A 26 20 YesP41.8 P41 582 646 −9 −9 6 32 SC C 26 50 YesP41.9 P41 705 705 −15 −9 29 32 SC A 3 6 YesP41.10 P41 763 763 −14 −4 30 32 SC A 2 10 YesP41.11 P41 821 829 −9 −9 29 32 SC C 3 6 YesP41.12 P41 885 898 −7 −7 30 32 SC C 2 10 YesP1.1 P1 92 121.3 −13.9 −13.7 30.4 38.1 TFC C 7.7 23 YesP1.2 P1 438.9 475.4 −13.3 −8.3 21.6 36 TFC C 14.4 29 YesP1.3 P1 641 700 −13.7 −13.4 15.1 38.1 TFC C 23 46 YesP1.4 P1 976.9 1004.4 −11.7 −9.3 25.2 36 TFC C 10.8 22 YesP4.1 P4 973.2 44.2 −6.2 −6.2 22 33.7 EDM C 11.7 70 YesP4.2 P4 222.1 286.6 −5.3 −5.3 26.6 33.7 EDM C 7.1 51 YesP4.3 P4 463.6 553.8 −8.6 −6.3 19.5 33.7 TFC C 14.2 71 YesP4.4 P4 726.4 799.7 −7.8 −5 24.4 33.7 TFC C 9.3 58 Yes
E

-4

E.3 True States for Open Flat Bar Test Blocks

Flaw ID

Test 

Block ID u1 u2 u3 u4 u5 u6 Type Orientation Depth Length

Surface 

Breaking

P28.1 P28 0 35 110 110 18.3 30.3 SCC C 12 35 YesP29.1 P29 0 35 110 110 20.3 30.3 SCC C 10 35 YesP30.1 P30 0 35 110 110 12.3 30.3 MFC C 18 35 YesP31.1 P31 0 35 110 110 26.3 30.3 SCC C 4 35 YesP32.1 P32 0 35 110 110 15.3 30.3 SCC C 26 35 YesP38.1 P38 0 35 110 110 25.3 30.3 SCC C 5 35 YesP42.1 P42 0 35 110 110 20 30.3 EDM C 10.3 35 Yes
E

-5

E.4 True States for Open LBDMW Test Blocks

Flaw ID

Test 

Block ID u1 u2 u3 u4 u5 u6 Type Orientation Depth Length

Surface 

Breaking

P37.1 P37 340 400 −5 0 54 76 SC C 22 49 NoP37.2 P37 543 543 −17.5 17.5 59 76 SC A 17 35 NoP37.3 P37 726 726 −3 4 78 79 SC A 1 7 YesP37.4 P37 882 906 −89 −89 69 72 SI C 3 20 NoP37.5 P37 1339 1370 71 75 72 76 LOB/LOF C 4 26 NoP37.6 P37 1509 1516 −105 −105 78 79 SC C 1 6 YesP37.7 P37 1666 1666 −8 5 73 79 SC A 6 13 YesP37.8 P37 1869 1869 −17.5 17.5 51 79 SC A 28 35 YesP37.9 P37 2130 2137 8 8 78 79 SC C 1 6 YesP37.10 P37 2282 2294 −1 −1 73 79 SC C 6 10 YesP37.11 P37 2667 2713 3 3 51 79 SC C 28 38 YesP12.1 P12 36.6 36.6 −27 7 53.9 77 EDM A 23.1 34 YesP12.2 P12 91.5 91.5 −20 0 71.5 77 SCC A 5.5 20 YesP23.1 P23 352.9 352.9 −30.2 −3.8 79 87.7 EDM A 8.7 26 YesP23.2 P23 512.6 512.6 −30.5 12.5 65.8 87.7 EDM A 21.9 43 YesP23.3 P23 193.1 193.1 −38.5 4.5 43.8 87.7 EDM A 43.9 43 YesP24.1 P24 123.6 156.3 0 0 79 87.7 EDM C 8.7 26 YesP24.2 P24 531.3 612.7 0 0 65.8 87.7 EDM C 21.9 66 YesP24.3 P24 273.8 436.9 0 0 43.8 87.7 EDM C 43.9 132 Yes

APPENDIX F

–

DEPTH SIZING RESULTS 

F-1 

APPENDIX F

DEPTH SIZING RESULTS

F.1 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks and FB 

Test Blocks with O.D. Access.................................................................................... F-2

F.2 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

and FB Test Blocks with O.D. Access ..................................................................... F-13

F.3 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks and FB 

Test Blocks with I.D. Access.................................................................................... F-17

F.4 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

and FB Test Blocks with I.D. Access....................................................................... F-20

F.5 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks, 

Excluding FB Test Blocks, and with O.D. Access .................................................. F-22

F.6 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks, 

Excluding FB Test Blocks, and with O.D. Access .................................................. F-29

F.7 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to FB Test Blocks with O.D. 

Access....................................................................................................................... F-32

F.8 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to FB Test Blocks with 

O.D. Access............................................................................................................... F-40

F.9 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to FB Test Blocks with I.D. 

Access....................................................................................................................... F-44

F.10 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to FB Test Blocks with 

I.D. Access ................................................................................................................ F-46

F.11 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks with 

O.D. Access............................................................................................................... F-48

F.12 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access....................................................................................................... F-51

F.13 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks with 

I.D. Access ................................................................................................................ F-53

F.14 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with I.D. Access ........................................................................................................ F-54
F-2 

F.1 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks and FB 

Test Blocks with O.D. Access

Figure F.1 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure HHUT.27.1 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks) 

Figure F.2 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure HHUT.27.2 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-3 

Figure F.3 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure LASH.18 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.4 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-4 

Figure F.5 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.6 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-5 

Figure F.7 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PATP.29 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.8 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.114 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-6 

Figure F.9 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.122.1 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.10 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.122.2 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-7 

Figure F.11 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.131.1 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.12 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.131.2 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-8 

Figure F.13 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.131.4 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.14 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.20 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-9 

Figure F.15 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure RT.109 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.16 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure RT.112 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-10

Figure F.17 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SAFT.17 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.18 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SHPA.6.1 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-11

Figure F.19 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SHPA.6.2 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.20 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SHPA.6.3 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-12

Figure F.21 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure UIR.20 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.22 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure UT.104 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-13

F.2 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

and FB Test Blocks with O.D. Access

Figure F.23 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for ADVPAUT Procedures SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-14

Figure F.24 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for NLUT Procedures SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.25 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for PAUT Procedures SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-15

Figure F.26 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for RT Procedures SBDMW Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.27 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for UIR Procedures SBDMW Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-16

Figure F.28 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for UT Procedures SBDMW Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-17

F.3 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks and FB 

Test Blocks with I.D. Access

Figure F.29 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure HHUT.30 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access – w/ FB test blocks) 
F-18

Figure F.30 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.31 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-19

Figure F.32 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.131.1 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-20

F.4 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

and FB Test Blocks with I.D. Access

Figure F.33 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for ADVPAUT Procedures on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)
F-21

Figure F.34 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for NLUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access – w/ FB test blocks)

Figure F.35 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for PAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access – w/ FB test blocks) 
F-22

F.5 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks, 

Excluding FB Test Blocks, and with O.D. Access

Figure F.36 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure HHUT.27.1 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)

Figure F.37 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure LASH.18 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)
F-23

Figure F.38 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)

Figure F.39 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PATP.29 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)
F-24

Figure F.40 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.114 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)

Figure F.41 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.131.2 on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)
F-25

Figure F.42 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure 131.4 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)

Figure F.43 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.20 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)
F-26

Figure F.44 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure RT.112 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)

Figure F.45 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SAFT.17 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)
F-27

Figure F.46 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SHPA.6.1 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)

Figure F.47 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SHPA.6.2 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)
F-28

Figure F.48 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure UT.104 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)
F-29

F.6 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks, 

Excluding FB Test Blocks, and with O.D. Access

Figure F.49 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for ADVPAUT Procedures on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)
F-30

Figure F.50 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for NLUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)

Figure F.51 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for PAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)
F-31

Figure F.52 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for RT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)

Figure F.53 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for UT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access – w/o FB test blocks)
F-32

F.7 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to FB Test Blocks with O.D. 

Access

Figure F.54 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure HHUT.27.2 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.55 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure LASH.18 on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-33

Figure F.56 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.57 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-34

Figure F.58 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.114 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.59 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.122.1 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-35

Figure F.60 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.122.2 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.61 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.131.1 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-36

Figure F.62 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.20 on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.63 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure RT.109 on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-37

Figure F.64 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure RT.112 on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.65 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SAFT.17 on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-38

Figure F.66 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SHPA.6.1 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.67 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SHPA.6.3 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-39

Figure F.68 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure UIR.20 on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.69 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure UT.104 on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-40

F.8 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to FB Test Blocks with 

O.D. Access

Figure F.70 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for ADVPAUT Procedures on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-41

Figure F.71 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for NLUT Procedures on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.72 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for PAUT Procedures on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access) 
F-42

Figure F.73 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for RT Procedures on FB Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.74 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for UIR Procedures on FB Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-43

Figure F.75 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for UT Procedures on FB Test Blocks in 

PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-44

F.9 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to FB Test Blocks with I.D. 

Access

Figure F.76 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure HHUT.30 on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)

Figure F.77 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
F-45

Figure F.78 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)

Figure F.79 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.131.1 on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
F-46

F.10 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to FB Test Blocks with 

I.D. Access

Figure F.80 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for ADVPAUT Procedures on FB Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
F-47

Figure F.81 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for NLUT Procedures on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)

Figure F.82 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for PAUT Procedures on FB Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
F-48

F.11 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks with 

O.D. Access

Figure F.83 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure LASH.18 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-49

Figure F.84 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 on LBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.85 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PATP.29 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-50

Figure F.86 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for ProcedurePAUT.150 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.87 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SAFT.17 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-51

F.12 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access

Figure F.88 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for ADVPAUT Procedures on LBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-52

Figure F.89 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for NLUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure F.90 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for PAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
F-53

F.13 Depth Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks with 

I.D. Access

Figure F.91 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 on LBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
F-54

Figure F.92 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.7 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)

F.14 Depth Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with I.D. Access

Figure F.93 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for ADVPAUT Procedures on LBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
F-55

Figure F.94 Depth Sizing Regression (in mm) for PAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)

APPENDIX G

–

LENGTH SIZING RESULTS

G-1 

APPENDIX G

LENGTH SIZING RESULTS

G.1 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks with 

O.D. Access.................................................................................................................G-2

G.2 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access.........................................................................................................G-6

G.3 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks with 

I.D. Access ..................................................................................................................G-9

G.4 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

with I.D. Access ........................................................................................................G-10

G.5 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks with 

O.D. Access...............................................................................................................G-11

G.6 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access.......................................................................................................G-13

G.7 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks with 

I.D. Access ................................................................................................................G-15

G.8 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with I.D. Access ........................................................................................................G-18

G.9 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to BMI Test Blocks with JGroove Weld Access ................................................................................................G-20
G-2 

G.1 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks with 

O.D. Access

Figure G.1 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure HHUT.27.1 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure G.2 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.114 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-3 

Figure G.3 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.131.2 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure G.4 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.131.4 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-4 

Figure G.5 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.20 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure G.6 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SAFT.17 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-5 

Figure G.7 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SHPA.6.1 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure G.8 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SHPA.6.2 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-6 

Figure G.9 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure UT.104 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

G.2 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access

Figure G.10 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for ADVPAUT Procedures on SBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-7 

Figure G.11 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for NLUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)

Figure G.12 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for PAUT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-8 

Figure G.13 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for UT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-9 

G.3 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks with 

I.D. Access

Figure G.14 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure AECT.33 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)

Figure G.15 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure ECT.16 on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
G-10

G.4 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to SBDMW Test Blocks 

with I.D. Access

Figure G.16 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for ECT Procedures on SBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
G-11

G.5 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks with 

O.D. Access

Figure G.17 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.150 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-12

Figure G.18 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure SAFT.17 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-13

G.6 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with O.D. Access

Figure G.19 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for ADVPAUT Procedures on LBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-14

Figure G.20 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for PAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (O.D. access)
G-15

G.7 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks with 

I.D. Access

Figure G.21 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure AECT.33 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
G-16

Figure G.22 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure CEECT.5.2 on LBDMW 

Test Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)

Figure G.23 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure ECT.16 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
G-17

Figure G.24 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure MM.28.1 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)

Figure G.25 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure PAUT.7 on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
G-18

G.8 Length Sizing Results for Procedure Types Applied to LBDMW Test Blocks 

with I.D. Access

Figure G.26 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for ECT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
G-19

Figure G.27 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for MM Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)

Figure G.28 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for PAUT Procedures on LBDMW Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (I.D. access)
G-20

G.9 Length Sizing Results for Procedures Applied to BMI Test Blocks with JGroove Weld Access

Figure G.29 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure AECT.33 on BMI Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (J-groove weld access)
G-21

Figure G.30 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure ECT.16 on BMI Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (J-groove weld access)

Figure G.31 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure ECT.7 on BMI Test Blocks 

in PARENT Open Testing (J-groove weld access)
G-22

Figure G.32 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure LUV.170 on BMI Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (J-groove weld access)

Figure G.33 Length Sizing Regression (in mm) for Procedure MM.28.1 on BMI Test 

Blocks in PARENT Open Testing (J-groove weld access)
APPENDIX H

–

INDICATION PLOTS 

H-1 

APPENDIX H

INDICATION PLOTS

H.1 Indication Plots for BMIs............................................................................................H-1

H.2 Indication Plots for DMWs........................................................................................H-18

H.1 Indication Plots for BMIs

Figure H.1 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.2 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-2 

Figure H.3 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.4 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-3 

Figure H.5 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.6 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-4 

Figure H.7 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.8 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-5 

Figure H.9 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.10 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-6 

Figure H.11 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.12 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-7 

Figure H.13 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.14 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-8 

Figure H.15 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.16 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-9 

Figure H.17 Indication Plot for Procedure GW.21 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.18 Indication Plot for Procedure GW.21 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-10

Figure H.19 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P21 in 

PARENT Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.20 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P21 in 

PARENT Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-11

Figure H.21 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.22 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-12

Figure H.23 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.24 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-13

Figure H.25 Indication Plot for Procedure CEECT.5.1 Applied to Test Block P7 in 

PARENT Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.26 Indication Plot for Procedure CEECT.5.1 Applied to Test Block P7 in 

PARENT Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-14

Figure H.27 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.28 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P5 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-15

Figure H.29 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P21 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.30 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P21 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-16

Figure H.31 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P22 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.32 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P22 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-17

Figure H.33 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – R view)

Figure H.34 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P7 in PARENT 

Open Testing (theta – Z view)
H-18

H.2 Indication Plots for DMWs

H.2.1 Plots for Team 104

Figure H.35 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P28 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.36 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P28 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-19

Figure H.37 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P29 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.38 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P29 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-20

Figure H.39 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P30 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.40 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P30 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-21

Figure H.41 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P31 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.42 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P31 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-22

Figure H.43 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P32 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.44 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P32 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-23

Figure H.45 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P38 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.46 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P38 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-24

Figure H.47 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P41 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.48 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P41 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-25

Figure H.49 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P42 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.50 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P42 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-26

Figure H.51 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P46 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.52 Indication Plot for Procedure UT.104 Applied to Test Block P46 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-27

H.2.2 Plots for Team 109

Figure H.53 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P29 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.54 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P29 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-28

Figure H.55 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P30 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.56 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P30 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-29

Figure H.57 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P31 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.58 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P31 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-30

Figure H.59 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P32 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.60 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P32 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-31

Figure H.61 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P38 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.62 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P38 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-32

Figure H.63 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P42 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.64 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.109 Applied to Test Block P42 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-33

H.2.3 Plots for Team 11

Figure H.65 Indication Plot for Procedure NRUS.11 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.66 Indication Plot for Procedure NRUS.11 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-34

Figure H.67 Indication Plot for Procedure PECT.11 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.68 Indication Plot for Procedure PECT.11 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-35

Figure H.69 Indication Plot for Procedure NRUS.11 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.70 Indication Plot for Procedure NRUS.11 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-36

Figure H.71 Indication Plot for Procedure PECT.11 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.72 Indication Plot for Procedure PECT.11 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-37

Figure H.73 Indication Plot for Procedure NRUS.11 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.74 Indication Plot for Procedure NRUS.11 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-38

Figure H.75 Indication Plot for Procedure PECT.11 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.76 Indication Plot for Procedure PECT.11 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-39

H.2.4 Plots for Team 112

Figure H.77 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.112 Applied to Test Block P28 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.78 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.112 Applied to Test Block P28 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-40

Figure H.79 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.112 Applied to Test Block P29 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.80 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.112 Applied to Test Block P29 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-41

Figure H.81 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.112 Applied to Test Block P30 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.82 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.112 Applied to Test Block P30 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-42

Figure H.83 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.112 Applied to Test Block P41 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.84 Indication Plot for Procedure RT.112 Applied to Test Block P41 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-43

H.2.5 Plots for Team 114

Figure H.85 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.86 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-44

Figure H.87 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.88 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-45

Figure H.89 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.90 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-46

Figure H.91 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.92 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-47

Figure H.93 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.94 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-48

Figure H.95 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.96 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-49

Figure H.97 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.98 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-50

Figure H.99 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P4 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.100 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P4 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-51

Figure H.101 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.102 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-52

Figure H.103 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.104 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.114 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-53

H.2.6 Plots for Team 122

Figure H.105 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.106 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-54

Figure H.107 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.108 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-55

Figure H.109 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.110 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-56

Figure H.111 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.112 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-57

Figure H.113 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.114 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-58

Figure H.115 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.116 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-59

Figure H.117 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.118 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-60

Figure H.119 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.120 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-61

Figure H.121 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.122 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-62

Figure H.123 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.124 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-63

Figure H.125 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.126 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-64

Figure H.127 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.128 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-65

Figure H.129 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.130 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.1 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-66

Figure H.131 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.132 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.122.2 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-67

H.2.7 Plots for Team 131

Figure H.133 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.134 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-68

Figure H.135 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.136 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-69

Figure H.137 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.138 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-70

Figure H.139 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.140 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-71

Figure H.141 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.142 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-72

Figure H.143 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.144 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-73

Figure H.145 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.146 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-74

Figure H.147 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P4 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.148 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P4 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-75

Figure H.149 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.150 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-76

Figure H.151 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.2 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.152 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.2 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-77

Figure H.153 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.154 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.131.1 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-78

H.2.8 Plots for Team 150

Figure H.155 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.150 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.156 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.150 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-79

Figure H.157 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.150 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.158 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.150 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-80

H.2.9 Plots for Team 16

Figure H.159 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P28 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.160 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P28 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-81

Figure H.161 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P29 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.162 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P29 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-82

Figure H.163 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P30 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.164 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P30 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-83

Figure H.165 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P31 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.166 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P31 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-84

Figure H.167 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P32 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.168 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P32 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-85

Figure H.169 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P38 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.170 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P38 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-86

Figure H.171 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.172 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-87

Figure H.173 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P4 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.174 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P4 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-88

Figure H.175 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P41 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.176 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P41 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-89

Figure H.177 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P12 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.178 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P12 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-90

Figure H.179 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P42 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.180 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.16 Applied to Test Block P42 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-91

H.2.10 Plots for Team 17

Figure H.181 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.182 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-92

Figure H.183 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.184 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-93

Figure H.185 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.186 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-94

Figure H.187 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.188 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-95

Figure H.189 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view) 

Figure H.190 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-96

Figure H.191 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.192 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-97

Figure H.193 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.194 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-98

Figure H.195 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.196 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-99

Figure H.197 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.198 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-100

Figure H.199 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.200 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-101

Figure H.201 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P23 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.202 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P23 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-102

Figure H.203 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P24 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.204 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P24 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-103

Figure H.205 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.206 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-104

Figure H.207 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.208 Indication Plot for Procedure SAFT.17 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-105

H.2.11 Plots for Team 170

Figure H.209 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.210 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-106

Figure H.211 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.212 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-107

Figure H.213 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.214 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-108

Figure H.215 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.216 Indication Plot for Procedure LUV.170 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-109

H.2.12 Plots for Team 18

Figure H.217 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.218 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-110

Figure H.219 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.220 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-111

Figure H.221 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.222 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-112

Figure H.223 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.224 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-113

Figure H.225 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.226 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-114

Figure H.227 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.228 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-115

Figure H.229 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.230 Indication Plot for Procedure LASH.18 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-116

H.2.13 Plots for Team 20

Figure H.231 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.232 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-117

Figure H.233 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P28 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.234 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P28 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-118

Figure H.235 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.236 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-119

Figure H.237 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P29 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.238 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P29 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-120

Figure H.239 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.240 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-121

Figure H.241 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P30 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.242 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P30 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-122

Figure H.243 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.244 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-123

Figure H.245 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P31 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.246 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P31 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-124

Figure H.247 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.248 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-125

Figure H.249 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P32 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.250 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P32 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-126

Figure H.251 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.252 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-127

Figure H.253 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P38 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.254 Indication Plot for Procedure UIR.20 Applied to Test Block P38 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-128

Figure H.255 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.256 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-129

H.2.14 Plots for Team 21

Figure H.257 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.258 Indication Plot for Procedure PAUT.20 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-130

H.2.15 Plots for Team 22

Figure H.259 Indication Plot for Procedure PATRT.22 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.260 Indication Plot for Procedure PATRT.22 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-131

H.2.16 Plots for Team 27

Figure H.261 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.262 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-132

Figure H.263 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.264 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-133

Figure H.265 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.266 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-134

Figure H.267 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.268 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-135

Figure H.269 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.270 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-136

Figure H.271 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.272 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-137

Figure H.273 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.274 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-138

Figure H.275 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.276 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-139

Figure H.277 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.278 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-140

Figure H.279 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.280 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.27.1 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-141

H.2.17 Plots for Team 28

Figure H.281 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.282 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-142

Figure H.283 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.284 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-143

Figure H.285 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.286 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-144

Figure H.287 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.288 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-145

Figure H.289 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.290 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-146

Figure H.291 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.292 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-147

Figure H.293 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P4 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.294 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P4 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-148

Figure H.295 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.296 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-149

Figure H.297 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.298 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-150

Figure H.299 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P23 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.300 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P23 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-151

Figure H.301 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P24 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.302 Indication Plot for Procedure MM.28.1 Applied to Test Block P24 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-152

H.2.18 Plots for Team 29

Figure H.303 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.304 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-153

Figure H.305 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.306 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-154

Figure H.307 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.308 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-155

Figure H.309 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.310 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-156

Figure H.311 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.312 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-157

Figure H.313 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.314 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-158

Figure H.315 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.316 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-159

Figure H.317 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.318 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-160

Figure H.319 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.320 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-161

Figure H.321 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.322 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-162

Figure H.323 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.324 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-163

Figure H.325 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.326 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-164

Figure H.327 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.328 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-165

Figure H.329 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.330 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-166

Figure H.331 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.332 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-167

Figure H.333 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.334 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-168

Figure H.335 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.336 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-169

Figure H.337 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.338 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-170

Figure H.339 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.340 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-171

Figure H.341 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.342 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-172

Figure H.343 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.344 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view) 
H-173

Figure H.345 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.346 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-174

Figure H.347 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.348 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-175

Figure H.349 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.350 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-176

Figure H.351 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.352 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-177

Figure H.353 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.354 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-178

Figure H.355 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.356 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-179

Figure H.357 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.358 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-180

Figure H.359 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.360 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P1 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-181

Figure H.361 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.362 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-182

Figure H.363 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.364 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-183

Figure H.365 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.366 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-184

Figure H.367 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.368 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-185

Figure H.369 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.370 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-186

Figure H.371 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.372 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-187

Figure H.373 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P23 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.374 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P23 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-188

Figure H.375 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P23 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.376 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P23 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-189

Figure H.377 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P23 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.378 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P23 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-190

Figure H.379 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P24 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.380 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P24 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-191

Figure H.381 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P24 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.382 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P24 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-192

Figure H.383 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P24 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.384 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P24 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-193

Figure H.385 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.386 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-194

Figure H.387 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.388 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-195

Figure H.389 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.390 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-196

Figure H.391 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.392 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-197

Figure H.393 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.394 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.0 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-198

Figure H.395 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.396 Indication Plot for Procedure PATP.29 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-199

Figure H.397 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.398 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.1 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-200

Figure H.399 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.400 Indication Plot for Procedure PAATOFD.29.2 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-201

H.2.19 Plots for Team 30

Figure H.401 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.30 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.402 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.30 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-202

Figure H.403 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.30 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.404 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.30 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view) 
H-203

Figure H.405 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.30 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.406 Indication Plot for Procedure HHUT.30 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-204

H.2.20 Plots for Team 33

Figure H.407 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.408 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-205

Figure H.409 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.410 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-206

Figure H.411 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.412 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-207

Figure H.413 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.414 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-208

Figure H.415 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.416 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-209

Figure H.417 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.418 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P38 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-210

Figure H.419 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.420 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P37 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-211

Figure H.421 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.422 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P41 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-212

Figure H.423 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.424 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-213

Figure H.425 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.426 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P42 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-214

Figure H.427 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.428 Indication Plot for Procedure AECT.33 Applied to Test Block P46 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-215

H.2.21 Plots for Team 5

Figure H.429 Indication Plot for Procedure CEECT.5.1 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.430 Indication Plot for Procedure CEECT.5.1 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-216

Figure H.431 Indication Plot for Procedure CEECT.5.1 Applied to Test Block P4 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.432 Indication Plot for Procedure CEECT.5.1 Applied to Test Block P4 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-217

Figure H.433 Indication Plot for Procedure CEECT.5.1 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.434 Indication Plot for Procedure CEECT.5.1 Applied to Test Block P12 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-218

H.2.22 Plots for Team 6

Figure H.435 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.436 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P28 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-219

Figure H.437 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.438 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P29 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-220

Figure H.439 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.440 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P30 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-221

Figure H.441 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.442 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P31 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-222

Figure H.443 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.444 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P32 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-223

Figure H.445 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.446 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P1 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-224

Figure H.447 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P4 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.448 Indication Plot for Procedure SHPA.6.1 Applied to Test Block P4 in 

PARENT Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-225

H.2.23 Plots for Team 7

Figure H.449 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P37 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.450 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P37 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)
H-226

Figure H.451 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P12 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Y view)

Figure H.452 Indication Plot for Procedure ECT.7 Applied to Test Block P12 in PARENT 

Open Testing (X – Z view)


Results of Open Testing for the Program to Assess the Reliability of 

Emerging Nondestructive Techniques August 2017 

R. M. Meyer, A. E. Holmes, and P. G. Heasler

NUREG/CR-7236, Vol. 2

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

P.O. Box 999 

Richland, WA 99352

Division of Engineering

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555-0001

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) conducted agreements with organizations in Finland, 

Japan, South Korea, Sweden and Switzerland to establish the Program to Assess the Reliability of 

Emerging Nondestructive Techniques (PARENT) whose goal was to investigate the performance of current 

and emerging nondestructive examination (NDE) procedures and techniques to find flaws in nickel-alloy 

welds and base materials. This was performed by conducting a series of open and blind international 

round-robin tests on a set of nickel alloy piping components that included large-bore dissimilar metal welds 

(LBDMW), small-bore dissimilar metal welds (SBDMW), and bottom-mounted instrumentation (BMI) 

penetration welds. The project was divided into open and blind testing to separate the evaluation of novel 

techniques implemented by nonqualified teams (open testing) from the evaluation of more established 

techniques implemented by commercial inspection service providers (blind testing). This report is focused 

on documenting the open testing activity and results. The open testing portion of PARENT was performed 

with knowledge of true-state information in the open test blocks provided to teams conducting tests. As a 

result, no detection performance analyses were performed on open test data. Thus, the evaluation of open 

test data is based on statistical analyses of sizing data and qualitative review of data response images.

Nondestructive Examination, Stress Corrosion Cracking, Dissimilar Metal Welds, 

Ultrasonic Testing, Probability of Detection

Technical

V6286



NUREG/CR-7236, Vol. 2 Results of Open Testing for the Program to Assess the Reliability of Emerging 

Nondestructive Techniques

August 2017