alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023190EN.01001301.xml

| 31.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/13

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 190/10)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Ancona – Milan Linate and vice versa
  Ancona – Rome Fiumicino and vice versa
  Ancona – Naples and vice versa |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 October 2023 |
| Address from which the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information:





  Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport |
| Department of Sustainable Mobility |
| Directorate-General for Airports, Air Transport and Satellite Services |
| Via Giuseppe Caraci, 36 |
| 00157 Rome |
| ITALY |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Ancona – Milan Linate and vice versa

Ancona – Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

Ancona – Naples and vice versa

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 October 2023

Address from which the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information:

Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport

Department of Sustainable Mobility

Directorate-General for Airports, Air Transport and Satellite Services

Via Giuseppe Caraci, 36

00157 Rome

ITALY

Tel. +39 0644127190

| National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) |
| --- |
| Air transport and licensing department |
| Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 |
| 00185 Rome |
| ITALY |

National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)

Air transport and licensing department

Viale Castro Pretorio, 118

00185 Rome

ITALY

Tel. +39 0644596532

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

Email: dg.ta@pec.mit.gov.it

osp@enac.gov.it.

---
### §308901. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) Collection.—The term "collection" means a collection of intellectual and cultural artifacts, including documents, sculpture, and works of art.

(2) Eligible entity.—The term "eligible entity" means a Federal entity, State, local, or tribal government, educational institution, or nonprofit organization.

(3) Historic property.—The term "historic property" has the meaning given the term in section 300308 of this title.

(4) Nationally significant.—The term "nationally significant", in reference to a collection or historic property, means a collection or historic property that meets the applicable criteria for national significance, in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Secretary pursuant to section 302103 of this title.

(5) Program.—The term "program" means the Save America's Treasures Program established under section 308902(a) of this title.

(6) Secretary.—The term "Secretary" means the Secretary, acting through the Director.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3243.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 308901 | 16 U.S.C. 469o(b). | Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, subtitle D, §7303(b), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1216. |

Section

In paragraph (4), the words "in reference to a collection or historic property" are added for clarity.
§ 1292.4 Responsibilities. ( a ) *HQ DLA.* ( 1 ) The Director, DLA/Deputy Director/Deputy Director, CAS will issue necessary security regulations and orders for PLFAs headed by civilians.
( 2 ) The Command Security Officer, DLA (DLA-T) will: ( i ) Provide technical staff guidance on the issuance of security regulations and orders.
( ii ) Keep the Director, DLA informed of violations of regulations/orders as reported.
( b ) *Field Activities.* ( 1 ) The Heads of Primary Level Field Activities will: ( i ) Publish a physical security plan which provides proper and economical use of personnel and equipment to prevent or minimize loss or damage from theft, espionage, sabotage, and other criminal or disruptive activities.
( ii ) Report violations of security regulations and orders to HQ DLA, ATTN: DLA-T, in accordance with DLAR 5705.1, Reporting of Security and Criminal Violations.
( 2 ) The Military Heads of DLA field activities will issue security regulations and orders as necessary for the protection of places and property under their jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of this part 1292 and other pertinent directives.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ruth Van De Walker, Appellant, v. Syracuse Bowling Center et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which disallowed her claim predicated upon an alleged industrial accident causing intervertebral disc injuries necessitating surgery and resulting in disability. In its decision, the board noted the evidence that claimant had a pre-existing hack condition and that at a time subsequent to the alleged industrial accident she sustained back pain while shoveling snow at home. The decision continued: *“*The Board finds on the credible evidence that it does not believe the claimant actually sustained the incident * * ***alleged * * * and that there is no causal relation between the claimant’s back condition and any alleged accidental injury.” The credibility of the claimant’s testimony was for the board, as was the weight of the medical evidence of causation dependent upon the history related by claimant. As was said in a recent ease: *“*The question of credibility is strictly within the province of the board and it was not bound as a matter of law to accept the testimony of claimant and his employer. The rejection of this evidence denuded the record of proof connecting the accident with the employment. *(Matter of Daus*v. *Gunderman & Sons,*283 N. Y. 459; *Matter of Gordon*v. *Gordon & Hyman,*11 A D 2d 833, motion for leave to appeal denied 8 N Y 2d 710; *Matter of Brenner*v. *Utilities Laundry,*14 A D 2d 626.) ” *(Matter of Manolakis*v. *Edison S. S. Corp.,*15 A D 2d 845.) Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
#### § 903.845 Civil penalties.

Part 845 of this chapter, *Civil Penalties,* applies to the assessment of civil penalties for violations on coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,148
<SECURITIES>                                     4,509
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,006)
<INVENTORY>                                      9,199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,175
<PP&E>                                          12,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,164
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,354)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,804
<SALES>                                         34,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,809
<CGS>                                           26,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,622
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (764)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,878)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,904)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      88
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,816)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.82)
        

</TABLE>
### §21101. Adoption of voluntary guidance by Commission

#### (a) In general

To assist States in meeting the requirements of part A of this subchapter, the Commission shall adopt voluntary guidance consistent with such requirements in accordance with the procedures described in section 21102 of this title.

#### (b) Deadlines

The Commission shall adopt the recommendations under this section not later than—

(1) in the case of the recommendations with respect to section 21081 of this title, January 1, 2004;

(2) in the case of the recommendations with respect to section 21082 of this title, October 1, 2003; and

(3) in the case of the recommendations with respect to section 21083 of this title, October 1, 2003.

#### (c) Quadrennial update

The Commission shall review and update recommendations adopted with respect to section 21081 of this title no less frequently than once every 4 years.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title III, §311, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1715.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15501 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 881.8 Withholding of payments.

Whenever the Secretary, after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing, finds that there is a failure by the State to expend funds in accordance with the terms and conditions governing the Government's contribution for an approved project, he shall notify the State that further payments will not be made to the State from available appropriations until he is satisfied that there will no longer be any such failure. Until the Secretary is so satisfied, payment of any financial contribution to the State shall be withheld.
### §101914. Term of concession contracts

A concession contract entered into pursuant to this subchapter shall generally be awarded for a term of 10 years or less. The Secretary may award a contract for a term of up to 20 years if the Secretary determines that the contract terms and conditions, including the required construction of capital improvements, warrant a longer term.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3142.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101914 | 16 U.S.C. 5953. | Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §404, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3508; Pub. L. 106–176, title III, §311, Mar. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 34. |

Section
Appeal No. 77-36.

#### Eleanor M. Johansen *v.*Harold L. Johansen.

*A. Norman LaSalle,*for plaintiff.

The motion of Ferdinand A. Bruno and Joseph J. 'Recupero to withdraw as counsel for the defendant is granted.
# C_2009141EN.01003801.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/38

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 2009 — CD-Contact Data v Commission

(Case T-18/03) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for Nintendo video games consoles and games cartridges - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Limitation of parallel exports - Proof of the existence of an agreement to limit parallel trade - Fines - Differential treatment - Attenuating circumstances)

2009/C 141/76

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CD-Contact Data GmbH (Burglengenfeld, Germany) (represented by: J. de Pree and R. Wesseling, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Oliver, X. Lewis and O. Beynet, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for the annulment of Commission Decision 2003/675/EC of 30 October 2002 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/35.587 PO Video Games, COMP/35.706 PO Nintendo Distribution and COMP/36.321 Omega — Nintendo) (OJ 2003 L 255, p. 33).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on CD-Contact Data GmbH at EUR 500 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on CD-Contact Data GmbH at EUR 500 000;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 70, 22.3.2003.

1

---
**EXHIBIT      32**

|                                       |   |   | **ECHELON                CORPORATION**                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November                9, 2006 |   | By:    | /s/                M. Kenneth Oshman                                                              |
|                                       |   |   | M.                Kenneth Oshman,Chairman                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

|                                       |   |   | **ECHELON                CORPORATION**                                                                         |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November                9, 2006 |   | By:    | /s/                Oliver R. Stanfield                                                                         |
|                                       |   |   | Oliver                R. Stanfield,Executive                Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
### SUBCHAPTER I—AIRPORTS
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.505 Mines classed gassy; use and maintenance of permissible electric face equipment.

[Statutory Provision]

Any coal mine which, prior to March 30, 1970, was classed gassy under any provision of law and was required to use permissible electric face equipment and to maintain such equipment in a permissible condition shall continue to use such equipment and to maintain such equipment in such condition.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Steven G. Larson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(i)           the Quarterly Report of LaserCard Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LaserCard Corporation.




Date: November 9, 2010




/s/ Steven G. LarsonSteven G. LarsonChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.1 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of North American Gaming and EntertainmentCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10–Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I E. H. Hawes II, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ E.H. HAWES, II

E.H.HAWES, II 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

 

**May 20, 2003**

 

----
#### § 947.707 Exemption for coal extraction incident to government-financed highway or other construction.

Part 707 of this chapter, *Exemption for Coal Extraction Incident to Government-Financed Highway or Other Construction,* shall apply to surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40571

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERTO RUANO-TENAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:17-CR-22-1

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto RuanoTenas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ruano-Tenas has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 20, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40571 Document: 00514354305 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
No. 17-40571

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-40571 Document: 00514354305 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 7 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DAVID K. HOEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DONALD B. ATKINS; T. BRETT

SWAB; TODD W. SINGER; DAN

MURDOCK; LAWRENCE A.G.

JOHNSON; BROWN J. AKIN, III;

LAURIE E. AKIN; J. PETER

MESSLER; BRADFORD GRIFFITH,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-5000

(D.C. No. 96-CV-268-E)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY, LOGAN, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral
-2-

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his complaint

alleging defendants are liable under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt

Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1961-1968. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.

The district court determined that plaintiff failed to allege interstate effects

sufficient to support a RICO claim, as he alleged in his complaint: “The impact

of [defendants’] schemes and activities occurred in Oklahoma. The participants

in this enterprise are residents of Oklahoma.” See Appellees’ Joint Supp’l App.

at 79-80; see also Appellant’s App. at 3; 18 U.S.C. § 1962. We have carefully

reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. We affirm for substantially the

same reasons as those set forth in the district court’s order filed December 6,

1996.

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Robert H. Henry

Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 10.320
                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$10,102.00                    Glendale, California                 June 29, 2000




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Rich Tobin (Payor") promises to pay in lawful money of
the United States of America to Pollution Research and Control Corp., a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale, California, the sum of
$10,102.00 Dollars from the date hereof on the unpaid principal payable in
installments of principal only in the sum of $50.00 Dollars commencing on July
15, 2000 and payable on the same day of each month thereafter until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each installment under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately due and payable if such default is not cured within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned written notice of such default. The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's common stock, no par value (the
"Shares"), pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason, the unpaid balance of this note shall be cancelled, and the pro rata
portion of Shares which then not fully paid for, shall be returned to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                                     Payor:



                                                     /s/ Rich Tobin
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     (Signature)