alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,717
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,545
<PP&E>                                          49,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,949
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                    (39,603)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,402
<SALES>                                         70,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,226
<CGS>                                           61,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (53,523)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,527)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (51,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (51,996)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (5.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.24)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                               52
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                       712
<ALLOWANCES>                          4
<INVENTORY>                         245
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1163
<PP&E>                            19778
<DEPRECIATION>                     5564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    18338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              3365
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                            250
<OTHER-SE>                         9576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      18338
<SALES>                            3664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   3687
<CGS>                              3239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      6810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    468
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (3592)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (3592)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                      (3592)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.15)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called the optional “peg” rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This rate will be 1.13 percent for the January-March quarter of FY 2021.

Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New York Prime rate or, in the event that rate exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given State.

John Wade,

Chief, Secondary Market Division, Office of Financial Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2020-28533 Filed 12-23-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2008079EN.01002502.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/25

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 February 2008 — Orsay v OHIM — Jiménez Arellano (O orsay)

(Case T-39/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for the word and figurative trade mark O orsay - Earlier national word and figurative trade mark D'ORSAY - Ground for refusal - Risk of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 79/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Orsay GmbH (Willstät, Germany) (represented by: D. von Schultz and S. Elbe, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially, by: U. Pfeghar, later by: G. Schneider, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: José Jiménez Arellano S.A. (Madrid, Spain) (represented initially, by: J. Astiz Suárez, later by: S. Hernán-Carrillo Portolés and finally by: A. Tarí Lázaro, lawyers,

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 November 2003 (Case R 394/2002-4) concerning an opposition procedure between José Jiménez Arellano S.A. and Orsay GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The application is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed;

| 2. | Orsay GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

.

Orsay GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

Orsay GmbH is ordered to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004.

1

---
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Walter Hujar. (B) The People of the State of New York v. William D. Keyes. (C) The People of the State of New York v. Theodore R. Krzywosz. (D) The People of the State of New York v. Anthony Villa. (E) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Francis J. Higgins v. Walter H. Wilkins, as Warden of Attica Prison. (F) The People of the State of New York v. William R. Liss. (G) The People of the State of New York v. Robert Jackson. (H) The People of the State of New York v. Clarence McNair. (I) The People of the State of New York v. Richard John Simari. (J) The People of the State of New York v. Francis E. Bronson. (K) The People of the State of New York v. Charles La Placa.

(No counsel.) (Thomas G. Rickert, Esq.) (No counsel.) (Mario J. Rossetti, Esq.) (Anthony L. Sapienza, Esq.) (John H. Stenger, Esq.) (Alan H. Vogt, Esq.) (No counsel.) (Anthony I. Renaldo, Esq.) (No counsel.) (No counsel.) [In each action] Motion granted to prosecute appeal on original papers, typewritten briefs, and counsel assigned, as indicated.
#### MISNER, Respondent, v. STRONG et al. Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 17, 1903.)

Action by William L. Misner against William H. Strong and others.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. See Smith v. Satterlee, 130 N. Y. 677, 29 N. E. 225.

HISCOCK, J., dissents upon the ground that it was incompetent to admit evidence of what was said in course of negotiations of settlement.
### §51105. Authorization of appropriations

Not more than $10,000,000 may be appropriated to the Secretary of Transportation to make grants under this chapter. Amounts appropriated under this section remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1345, §70305 of title 49; renumbered §70305 then §51105 of title 51, Pub. L. 111–314, §4(d)(2), (4)(E), Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3440, 3441.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70305 | 15:5804(b) (2d, last sentences). | Nov. 4, 1992, Pub. L. 102–588, §505(b) (2d, last sentences), 106 Stat. 5125. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–314 successively renumbered section 70305 of title 49 and section 70305 of this title as this section.
### §10504. Judicial relief; civil actions by the Attorney General; three-judge district court; appeal to Supreme Court

Whenever the Attorney General has reason to believe that a State or political subdivision (a) has enacted or is seeking to administer any test or device as a prerequisite to voting in violation of the prohibition contained in section 10501 of this title, or (b) undertakes to deny the right to vote in any election in violation of section 10502 or 10503 of this title, he may institute for the United States, or in the name of the United States, an action in a district court of the United States, in accordance with sections 1391 through 1393 1 of title 28, for a restraining order, a preliminary or permanent injunction, or such other order as he deems appropriate. An action under this subsection shall be heard and determined by a court of three judges in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of title 28 and any appeal shall be to the Supreme Court.

(Pub. L. 89–110, title II, §204, formerly §203, as added Pub. L. 91–285, §6, June 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 317; renumbered §204 and amended Pub. L. 94–73, title III, §§302, 303, title IV, §406, Aug. 6, 1975, 89 Stat. 403, 405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1393 of title 28, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 100–702, title X, §1001(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4664.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1973aa–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section. Some section numbers referenced in amendment notes below reflect the classification of such sections prior to their editorial reclassification to this title.

#### Amendments

1975—Pub. L. 94–73 inserted reference to section 1973aa–1a of this title and substituted reference to section 2284 of title 28 for reference to section 2282 of title 28.

1 See References in Text note below.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1091 

Recognizing and thanking the Nation’s women’s colleges and universities 

and recognizing March 5 as ‘‘National Women’s Colleges and Universities 

Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2024 

Ms. GRANGER (for herself, Ms. DELAURO, and Ms. BALINT) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 

and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and thanking the Nation’s women’s colleges and 

universities and recognizing March 5 as ‘‘National Women’s Colleges and Universities Day’’. 

Whereas American women’s colleges, founded more than 250 

years ago to create access and opportunity for women in 

higher education, and the 30 remaining institutions in 

our Nation continue to operate toward that noble mission 

to this day; 

Whereas the number of American women’s colleges have decreased from 230 institutions in the 1960s to only 30 operating today; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1091 IH 

Whereas America’s women’s colleges have historically played 

and continue to play a critical economic, cultural, and social role in the life of the Nation; 

Whereas women’s colleges have played a hard-fought role in 

the history of the United States of America by forging 

the first means for higher educational parity for women 

of our Nation; 

Whereas women’s colleges have been particularly important in 

the establishment of early charitable, philanthropic, and 

cultural institutions in our Nation; 

Whereas our Nation’s women’s colleges enroll high numbers 

of diverse student populations and first-generation students, thereby addressing our Nation’s need for socioeconomic mobility as well as a more diverse workforce; 

Whereas 60 percent of women’s colleges have a higher than 

national average of Pell recipients, thus continuing their 

mission of serving the underserved of the Nation; 

Whereas the percent of bachelor’s degrees in STEM fields 

conferred to American women of color is significantly 

higher at women’s colleges than co-ed liberal arts colleges; 

Whereas women’s colleges are singularly focused on the advancement of women by providing exceptional leadership 

opportunities and experiences which empower women and 

prepare them for success in a global society; 

Whereas women’s colleges present a unique and individualized learning experience for their students, delivering 

well-qualified women to our Nation’s labor force; and 

Whereas, despite this, the role of women’s colleges in history 

has been consistently overlooked and undervalued, in the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1091 IH 

engagement, elevation of, and representation in our Nation’s higher education system: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the indelible impact of the women’s college move3 ment and sector, and we thank them, for their invaluable 

4 contribution to the American higher education landscape 

5 and to the Nation’s workforce. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### §10207. Promotions

(a) In General.—Each member who is promoted to a higher rank shall receive basic pay at the same step at which such member was being compensated prior to the date of the promotion.

(b) Credit for Service.—For the purposes of a service step adjustment under section 10205, periods of service at the lower rank shall be credited in the same manner as if it was service at the rank to which the employee is promoted.

(Added Pub. L. 111–282, §2(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3037.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of first pay period which begins after Oct. 15, 2010, see section 5 of Pub. L. 111–282, set out as an Effective Date of 2010 Amendment note under section 5102 of this title.
§ 590.6 Are informal resolutions permitted? ( a ) You may seek informal resolution with the issuing officer's next level supervisor during the 60-day period established in § 590.3.
( b ) Nothing in this subpart precludes resolution by settlement of any appeal or matter pending in the administrative process after the 60-day period established in § 590.3.
# C_2008260EN.01001901.xml

| 11.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/19

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Full Court) of 24 June 2008 — Carlos Andres and Others v European Central Bank

(Case F-15/05) (1)

1

(Staff case - ECB staff - Remuneration - Consultation of the ECB staff committee - Method of calculation of annual salary adjustment - Enforcement of a judgment of a Community judicature - Retroactivity)

(2008/C 260/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Carlos Andrés and Others (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Zilioli and K. Sugar, Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

First, application for annulment of the applicants' salary slips for the month of July 2004, in so far as they contain an salary increase set in accordance with an allegedly unlawful method of annual salary adjustment and that increase does not have retroactive effect with regard to the years 2001, 2002 and 2003, and, secondly, an application for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 132, 28.5.2005, p. 32 (Case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-131/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
### §911. Discharge of committee considering resolution

If the committee to which is referred a resolution introduced pursuant to subsection (a) of section 910 (or, in the absence of such a resolution, the first resolution introduced with respect to the same reorganization plan) has not reported such resolution or identical resolution at the end of 75 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after its introduction, such committee shall be deemed to be discharged from further consideration of such resolution and such resolution shall be placed on the appropriate calendar of the House involved.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 397; Pub. L. 92–179, §5, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 576; Pub. L. 95–17, §2, Apr. 6, 1977, 91 Stat. 34; Pub. L. 98–614, §3(b)(4), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3192.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 133z–13. | June 20, 1949, ch. 226, §204, 63 Stat. 207. |

Statutes at Large

In subsection (a), the words "at the end of 10 calendar days . . . it is" are substituted for "before the expiration of ten calendar days . . . it shall then (but not before) be".

In subsection (b), the words "A motion to discharge" are substituted for "Such motion".

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–614 substituted "75 calendar days" for "45 calendar days".

1977—Pub. L. 95–17 substituted provisions deeming the committee discharged from further consideration of a resolution where that committee has not reported the resolution within 45 days of continuous session of Congress after the resolution's introduction for provisions permitting a motion to discharge a committee where the committee considering a resolution has not reported the resolution within 20 calendar days after the resolution's introduction, provisions permitting a motion to discharge to be made only by an individual favoring the resolution and limiting debate to 1 hour, and provisions prohibiting a renewal of a motion to discharge where the original motion was agreed to or disagreed to or the making of another motion with respect to a resolution from the same reorganization plan.

1971—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 92–179 substituted "20 calendar days" for "10 calendar days".
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5



                               September 30, 2003



Sionix Corporation
9272 Jeronimo Road, Suite 108
Irvine, CA 92618

         Re:   STOCK RESTRICTION AGREEMENT; CANCELLATION OF SHARES
               ---------------------------------------------------

Dear Sirs:

         This is to confirm that, pursuant to a Stock Restriction Agreement
between the undersigned and Sionix Corporation (the "Agreement"), during 1999
and 2000 Sionix Corporation awarded an aggregate of 6,917,650 shares of Common
Stock (the "Award Shares") to the undersigned. The Agreement provided that the
Award Shares were subject to substantial restrictions, and could not be sold or
transferred until certain conditions were met.

         Since the conditions in the Agreement have not been met, we have agreed
that the Award Shares will be cancelled immediately. Accordingly, accompanying
this letter are certificates representing all of the Award Shares for
cancellation. The undersigned hereby transfers the Award Shares to you for
cancellation, and agrees to execute any Stock Assignment or Stock Power you may
request.

          Please instruct your Transfer Agent to cancel the certificates, remove
the shares from the stock register, and return the shares to the status of
authorized but unissued shares on its records.


                                                              Very truly yours,

                                                              /S/ JAMES J. HOUTZ
                                                              ------------------
                                                              James J. Houtz

Agreed and accepted:

Sionix Corporation

By JAMES J. HOUTZ
   --------------
#### § 1624.8 Transfer for induction.

The Director of Selective Service may direct that a registrant or registrants in a specified group of registrants be transferred for induction to such MEPS as he may designate.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—VOLUNTARY LEAVE BANK PROGRAM