alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 19

- 14320 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:19

- cr - 00006

- EAK

- CPT

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus

JAMES STANLEY , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (June 12, 2020) Before MARTIN , ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Burns , appointed counsel for James Stanley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

Case: 19-14320 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 22 appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
t he relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Stanley ’s conviction s and sentence s are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 19-14320 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 2 of 2
### **CHAPTER 23—MERIT SYSTEM PRINCIPLES**

Sec.
2301.
Merit system principles.
2302.
Prohibited personnel practices.
2303.
Prohibited personnel practices in the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
2304.
Prohibited personnel practices affecting the Transportation Security Administration.
2305.
Responsibility of the Government Accountability Office.
2306.
Coordination with certain other provisions of law.
[2307.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1097(b)(1)(A), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1616, struck out item 2307 "Information on whistleblower protections".

Pub. L. 115–73, title I, §107(c), Oct. 26, 2017, 131 Stat. 1240, added item 2307.

**2012**—Pub. L. 112–199, §109(b), Nov. 27, 2012, 126 Stat. 1471, added items 2304 to 2306 and struck out former items 2304 "Responsibility of the Government Accountability Office" and 2305 "Coordination with certain other provisions of law".

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814, substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office" in item 2304.
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 000300tp
- 00040000
- 00050001
- 00060002
- 00070000
- 00080000
- 00090003
- 00100004
- 00110000
- 00120000
- 00130005
- 00140006
- 00150000
- 00160000
- 00170000
- 00180000
- 00190000
- 00200000
- 00210000
- 00220000
- 00230000
- 00240000
- 00250000
- 00260000
- 00270000
- 00280000
- 00290000
- 00300000
- 00310000
- 00320000
- 00330000
- 00340000
- 00350000
- 00360000
- 00370000
- 00380000
- 00390000
- 00400000
- 00410000
- 00420000
- 00430000
- 00440000
- 00450007
- 00460008
- 00470009
- 00480000
- 004900bi
- 005000bc
### §4120. Training for employees of the Capitol Police

(a) The Chief of the Capitol Police may, by regulation, make applicable such provisions of this chapter as the Chief determines necessary to provide for training of employees of the Capitol Police. The regulations shall provide for training which, in the determination of the Chief, is consistent with the training provided by agencies under the preceding sections of this chapter.

(b) The Office of Personnel Management shall provide the Chief of the Capitol Police with such advice and assistance as the Chief may request in order to enable the Chief to carry out the purposes of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 108–7, div. H, title I, §1010(a), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 360.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1998  
<CASH>                                              29,093  
<SECURITIES>                                             0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                       86,112  
<ALLOWANCES>                                        29,086  
<INVENTORY>                                              0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   106,917  
<PP&E>                                              22,692  
<DEPRECIATION>                                       8,688  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,327,264  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              483,680  
<BONDS>                                                  0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               11,780  
<PREFERRED>                                              0  
<COMMON>                                                 0  
<OTHER-SE>                                         256,979  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,327,264  
<SALES>                                            243,146  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   901,450  
<CGS>                                                    0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       804  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     804  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     98,422  
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 98,422  
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0  
<CHANGES>                                                0  
<NET-INCOME>                                        98,422  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0  
                                               


</TABLE>
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT OF RAINS COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 17th

day of December, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

HAROLD JAYLYNN COUCH, Appellant

NO. 12-13-00127-CR; Trial Court No. 5172

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 10th day of February, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
**Exhibit
      32.01**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER**


(Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I,
      Catherine Thompson, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of MATRIXX RESOURCE HOLDINGS, INC. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in
      accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:





(1)           the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this certification
      is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of  1934, as amended ;





and





(2)           the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Date:
                  May 21, 2007/s/
                  Catherine ThompsonCatherine
                  ThompsonInterim
                  Chief Executive Officer andChief
                  Financial Officer
# C_2008197EN.01003504.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/35

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 June 2008 — Martinez-Mongay v Commission

(Case T-101/04) (1)

1

(2008/C 197/63)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Christopher W. Vieth, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 of Dow Jones & Company, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 3, 2004
### §51303. Asteroid resource and space resource rights

A United States citizen engaged in commercial recovery of an asteroid resource or a space resource under this chapter shall be entitled to any asteroid resource or space resource obtained, including to possess, own, transport, use, and sell the asteroid resource or space resource obtained in accordance with applicable law, including the international obligations of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 114–90, title IV, §402(a), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 721.)
#### Helen Swirski, Appellant, v. William J. Price, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed unless record and appellant’s 'brief are filed and served on or before December 6, 1963. -Cross motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent of permitting appeal to be prosecuted upon one typewritten record on appeal and five typewritten briefs. Memorandum: It is not clear from the moving papers whether the appellant has ordered the minutes of the trial. It may be surmised therefrom, however, that she is without funds to do so. Section 1101 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules authorizes application to this court by any party for permission to proceed as a poor person. Such relief in the past has been granted by us either by authority of statute or in the exercise of our plenary power. (Cf. *Eagle Contrs. of Utica,*v. *Black,*5 A D 2d 954.) However, a stenographic transcript may not be furnished to such a poor person except upon order “of the court before whom the action was tried” upon notice to the County Attorney (CPLR, § 1102, subd. [b]).
\\DC - 004721/000002 - 4689019 v2 BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

INTRA-ALASKA SERVICE MAIL RATES ) ) ) ) Dockets DOT-OST-2003-14694 DOT-OST-2003-14695 June 12, 2013

NOTICE OF EQUALIZATION OF PENINSULA AIRWAYS, INC. Pursuant to a request by the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), Peninsula Airways, Inc. (“PenAir”), a certificated air carrier with authority to transport U.S. mail within the State of Alaska, hereby provides notice of its intent to equalize and match, on a total rate per pound basis, the lower rates or combination of rates now in effect or hereafter prescribed and paid to Everts and Northern Air Cargo (“NAC”) for each category of mail it transports between Anchorage and Aniak, effective immediately. 1 In further support of this Notice, PenAir states the following: 1. DOT Order 1990-10-34 provides that an air carrier may elect to establish a reduced charge equal to the charge prescribed for mail transportation actually being performed between the same origin and destination points by any other certificated carrier or combination of carriers, regardless of routing. 2. Subject to the conditions below and pursuant to the USPS’ request, PenAir gives this notice of its election to equalize and match on a total rate per pound basis, the lower rate or combination of rates now in effect or hereafter prescribed and paid to Everts and NAC for each category of mail it transports between Anchorage and Aniak. PenAir elects to equalize in this market to any lower rate or combination of rates prescribed and paid in the future to any other carrier or carriers. 3. Rate equalization under this notice is immediately effective and will remain in effect until terminated by written notice filed at least ten days in advance of such termination; provided, however, that this rate equalization notice ceases to be effective when and so long as a lower-rated service or combination of services is not offered between Anchorage and Aniak or is not utilized by the USPS for mail transportation.

1 Although PenAir is a mainline carrier on the Anchorage – Aniak route, PenAir is filing this notice at the request of the USPS.\\DC - 004721/000002 - 4689019 v2 WHEREFORE, PenAir give this notice of equalization of its mail rates and requests equitable tender of mail in this market pursuant to the practices and procedures of the Department of Transportation and the United States Postal Service. Respectfully submitted,

______________________ Scott Bloomquist Peninsula Airways

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Equalization of PenAir has been served this June 12, 2013 upon each of the following addressees: kevin.adams@dot.gov Joseph.Anzalone@usps.gov joefjr.mcdonald@usps.gov dsquier@nac.aero reverts@evertsair.com amiller@lac.lynden.com john@ACEAirCargo.com MLenorman@ERAaviation.com Joe.Sprague@Alaskaair.com mike.hageland@hageland.com bob@FrontierFlying.com

______________________
#### § 1662.25 The FOIA Exemptions 8 and 9: Records on financial institutions; records on wells.

Exemption 8 exempts from disclosure records about regulation or supervision of financial institutions. Exemption 9 exempts from disclosure geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2006 – Italy and Wam v Commission**

**(Joined Cases T-304/04 and T-316/04)**

State aid – Loans at reduced rates intended to make it possible to become established in certain non-member countries – Effect on trade between Member States and distortion of competition – Statement of reasons

State aid – Commission decision finding aid to be incompatible with the common market (Arts 87(1) EC and 253 EC) (see paras 60-78)

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/177/EC of 19 May 2004 on State aid No C 4/2003 (ex NN 102/2002) implemented by Italy for WAM SpA (OJ 2006 L 63, p. 11). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Annuls Commission Decision 2006/177/EC of 19 May 2004 on State aid No C 4/2003 (ex NN 102/2002) implemented by Italy for WAM SpA (OJ 2006 L 63, p. 11); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Dismisses the actions as to the remainder; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred, in Case T-304/04, by the Italian Republic and, in Case T-316/04, by Wam, including those relating to the interim proceedings. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-K AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           7,099,553
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          5,799,166
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     55,272
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>               45,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,899,774
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          95,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                95,954
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        7,104,207
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             150,570
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             150,570
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>       (1,300,387)
<NET-ASSETS>                    5,803,820
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                   8,703
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    783,043
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (774,340)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>       (1,257,715)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>       1,630,625
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            (401,430)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (401,430)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>             114,419
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   783,793
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            6,004,535
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  62
<PER-SHARE-NII>                       (13)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    49
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                     13.04
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not 
taxable.
</FN>

</TABLE>
§ 7.67 Construction test. The construction test is to be performed on the blasting unit subsequent to the output energy test of § 7.66. ( a ) *Test procedures.* ( 1 ) The blasting unit shall be dropped 20 times from a height of 3 feet onto a horizontal concrete floor. When dropped, the orientation of the blasting unit shall be varied each time in an attempt to have a different surface, corner, or edge strike the floor first for each drop.
( 2 ) After the blasting unit has been drop tested in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) above, it shall be submerged in 1 foot of water for 1 hour in each of 3 tests. The water temperature shall be maintained within ±5 °F (±2.8 °C) of 40 °F (4.4 °C), 70 °F (21.1 °C) and 100 °F (37.8 °C) during the tests.
( 3 ) Immediately after removing the blasting unit from the water at each temperature, the unit shall be operated first with the firing line terminals open circuited, then operated again with the firing line terminals short circuited, and last, the output energy tested in accordance with the output energy test of § 7.66.
( b ) *Acceptable performance.* ( 1 ) The blasting unit shall meet the acceptable performance criteria of the output energy test in § 7.66 each time it is performed.
( 2 ) There shall be no damage to the firing line terminals that exposes an electric conductor.
( 3 ) The visual indicator shall be operational.
( 4 ) The batteries shall not be separated from the blasting unit.
( 5 ) There shall be no water inside the blasting unit enclosure, except for the battery compartment.
### Deformation of the Roberts Mountains Allochthon in north-central Nevada

By: James George EvansTed G. Theodore

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1060

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.