alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1636.1 Purpose; definitions. ( a ) The provisions of this part govern the consideration of a claim by a registrant for classification in Class 1-A-0 (§ 1630.11 of this chapter), or Class 1-0 (§ 1630.17 of this chapter).
( b ) The definitions of this paragraph shall apply in the interpretation of the provisions of this part: ( 1 ) *Crystallization of a Registrant's Beliefs.* The registrant's becoming conscious of the fact that he is opposed to participation in war in any form.
( 2 ) *Noncombatant Service.* Service in any unit of the Armed Forces which is unarmed at all times; any other military assignment not requiring the bearing of arms or the use of arms in combat or training in the use of arms.
( 3 ) *Noncombatant Training.* Any training which is not concerned with the study, use, or handling of arms or other implements of warfare designed to destroy human life.
# C_2023313DE.01000601.xml

| 4.9.2023 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 313/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2023

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 313/6

---

Berichtigung der Mitteilung an Bryan D’Ancona, Mesut Sekerci, Osama Mahmood, Faruq Al-Suri, Sami Al-Aridi, Jafar Dicko, Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS), Hurras Al-Din (HaD) und Ansarul Islam Personen, Gruppen, Unternehmen und Einrichtungen, die den restriktiven Maßnahmen nach dem Beschluss (GASP) 2016/1686 und der Verordnung (EU) 2016/1686 unterliegen (siehe Anhang des Beschlusses (GASP) 2023/848 des Rates vom 24. April 2023 sowie Anhang der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2023/845 des Rates vom 24. April 2023)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 260 vom 24. Juli 2023
  )

(2023/C 313/05)

Inhaltsverzeichnis und Seite 3, Titel:

Anstatt:

„Berichtigung der Mitteilung an Bryan D’Ancona, Mesut Sekerci, Osama Mahmood, Faruq Al-Suri, Sami Al-Aridi, Jafar Dicko, Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS), Hurras Al-Din (HaD) und Ansarul Islam

Personen, Gruppen, Unternehmen und Einrichtungen, die den restriktiven Maßnahmen nach dem Beschluss (GASP) 2016/1686 und der Verordnung (EU) 2016/1686 unterliegen

(siehe Anhang des Beschlusses (GASP) 2023/848 des Rates vom 24. April 2023 sowie Anhang der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2023/845 des Rates vom 24. April 2023)“

muss es heißen:

„Berichtigung der Mitteilung an Bryan D’Ancona, Mesut Sekerci, Osama Mahmood, Faruq Al-Suri, Sami Al-Aridi, Jafar Dicko, Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS), Hurras Al-Din (HaD) und Ansarul Islam

Personen, Gruppen, Unternehmen und Einrichtungen, die den restriktiven Maßnahmen nach dem Beschluss (GASP) 2016/1693 und der Verordnung (EU) 2016/1686 unterliegen

(siehe Anhang des Beschlusses (GASP) 2023/848 des Rates vom 24. April 2023 sowie Anhang der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2023/845 des Rates vom 24. April 2023)“.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.704-1 Approved methods of grounding.

The methods of grounding stated in § 75.701-1 will also be approved with respect to the grounding of frames of high-voltage equipment referred to in § 75.704.
Office of Disability Employment Policy 

U.S. Department of Labor • 200 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20210

Voice: 1-866-ODEP-DOL (633-7365) • TTY: 1-877-889-5627 • Fax: 1-202-693-7888 

www.dol.gov/odep 

Corporate Initiatives that Include Employees 

with Disabilities

WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE

The workforce as a whole will age as 

employees stay on the job well past today’s

standard retirement age. One of the residual

effects will be an increase in the numbers 

of workers with disabilities.

All businesses and organizations 

are engaged in a “war for talent” 

Employer Resources:

1-866-EARN-NOW, V/TTY

www.earnworks.com

www.jan.wvu.edu

800-526-7234 (V/TTY)
The Office of Disability

Employment Policy’s Job

Accommodation Network (JAN)

conducted a customer

satisfaction survey on uses of

JAN's services. The most

frequently mentioned direct

benefits of working with JAN

were: 

(1) Retaining qualified employees 

(2) Increasing worker productivity 

(3) Eliminating costs of training 

Implementing a vigorous, expansive recruiting strategy

provides companies with a wide-range of talent, 

critical to the success of any enterprise 

It’s time your organization took a closer look at

workers with disabilities

18.6 million workers with disabilities contribute 

their talents to companies and

organizations large and small*

They are attorneys, warehouse

managers, retail service

personnel and local, state 

and federal employees

Students with

disabilities are graduating

with IT, engineering, accounting,

law and science degrees

Cultivating an inclusive

corporate culture can

attract top

talent among 

candidates with and

without disabilities

What do NFI Award** winners IBM®, Cingular

Wireless® and SunTrust Banks, Inc.®

have in common? They actively recruit, hire and

promote candidates with disabilities

Why? Performance –

Retention – Attendance 

The typical cost of a job

accommodation is $600 

or less, some don’t cost anything

How to access this talent

pool? Visit www.dol.gov/odep

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Retention

Productivity

Eliminate Training Costs

Percentage of Employers Interviewed

Source: JAN/Law, Health Policy, and Disability Center (LHPDC) satisfaction survey 01/2004 - 09/2005.

As of September 2005, LHPDC interviewed 890 employers.

**The New Freedom Initiative Awards are presented to organizations, employers and individuals who

make a difference in the workplace for Americans with disabilities.

*Reference: Census 2000 Summary File #3 

(March 2003, U.S. Census Bureau).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-10615

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MORGAN CLIFFORD WOOD, also known as Roca Mick,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-198-3

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Morgan Clifford Wood has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Wood has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 16, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-10615 Document: 00512210155 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2013
No. 12-10615

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-10615 Document: 00512210155 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2013
### §4135. Claims of stockholders

#### (a) Ownership interest in entity which is a national of the United States

A claim under section 4132 of this title based upon an ownership interest in any corporation, association, or other entity which is a national of the United States shall be denied.

#### (b) Ownership interest in entity which was not a national of the United States on date of loss

A claim under section 4132 of this title, based upon a direct ownership interest in a corporation, association, or other entity which suffered a loss within the meaning of said section, shall be allowed, subject to other provisions of this subchapter, if such corporation, association, or other entity on the date of the loss was not a national of the United States, without regard to the per centum of ownership vested in the claimant in any such claim.

#### (c) Indirect ownership interest; minimum requirement

A claim under section 4132 of this title, based upon an indirect ownership interest in a corporation, association, or other entity which suffered a loss within the meaning of said section, shall be allowed, subject to other provisions of this subchapter, only if at least 25 per centum of the entire ownership interest thereof at the time of such loss was vested in nationals of the United States.

#### (d) Calculation of award

Any award on a claim under subsection (b) or (c) of this section shall be calculated on the basis of the total loss suffered by such corporation, association, or other entity, and shall bear the same proportion to such loss as the ownership interest of the claimant bears to the entire ownership interest thereof.

(July 3, 1948, ch. 826, title II, §205, as added Pub. L. 87–846, title I, §103, Oct. 22, 1962, 76 Stat. 1109.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 2017d of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42286

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WORTHLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 838

Filed: December 3, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Christopher Allen Worthley pled guilty to attempted strangulation and violation of a no 

contact order. Idaho Code §§ 18-923, 18-920. The district court entered a withheld judgment 

and placed Worthley on probation for a period of seven years. Subsequently, he violated his 

probation and the district court revoked his probation and imposed a unified sentence of ten 

years with three years determinate and retained jurisdiction. After the period of retained 

jurisdiction, the district court placed Worthley on probation for ten years. Just over a year later, 

Worthley admitted to again violating his probation. The district court revoked his probation and 

ordered his underlying sentence executed without reduction. Worthley filed an Idaho Criminal 

Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied. Worthley appeals asserting that the district 

court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 35 motion for a reduction of sentence.
2

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Gill, 150 Idaho 183, 186, 244 P.3d 1269, 1272 (Ct. App. 2010). In 

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). An appeal from the 

denial of a Rule 35 motion cannot be used as a vehicle to review the underlying sentence absent 

the presentation of new information. Id. Because no new or additional information in support of 

Worthley’s Rule 35 motion was presented, the district court did not abuse its discretion. For the 

foregoing reasons, the district court’s order denying Worthley’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Bear

Big Horn

Cheyenne

Great Divide-Upper Green

Great Salt Lake

Missouri-Little Missouri

Niobrara

North Platte

Powder-Tongue

South Platte

Upper Snake

Upper Yellowstone

White-Yampa

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Major Streams

Cities

Map 3-24: Watersheds and 

Surface Water Features
#### § 1800.3 Contact for general information and requests.

For general information on this part, to inquire about the FOIA program at NACIC, or to file a FOIA request (or expression of interest), please direct your communication in writing to the Information and Privacy Coordinator, Executive Secretariat Office, National Counterintelligence Center, 3W01 NHB, Washington, DC 20505. Such inquiries will also be accepted by facsimile at (703)874-5844. For general information or status information on pending cases only, the telephone number is (703)874-4121. Collect calls cannot be accepted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1997

<CASH>                      54,580,706
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                1,276,293
<ALLOWANCES>                      0
<INVENTORY>                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>            55,856,999
<PP&E>                      91,675,837
<DEPRECIATION>                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>             160,776,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        1,795,941
<BONDS>                     63,123,525
<COMMON>                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       0
<OTHER-SE>                  70,694,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>160,776,991
<SALES>                     26,345,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>            48,208,830
<CGS>                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>               11,464,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               764,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           6,108,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>             27,714,839
<INCOME-TAX>                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         27,714,839
<DISCONTINUED>              (6,455,513)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                393,705
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                21,653,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   111.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                   111.81




</TABLE>
#### M. W. Douglas et al., copartners, trading as Douglas Products Company, appellees, v. Louis Meyer, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,787.

Action by tenant against landlord to recover for damage to merchandise from flooding of basement caused by clogged drains and down spouts. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George B. Holmes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 9, 1925.

Charles J. Mueller, for appellant.

A. S. and E. W. Eroehlich, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Statement of Financial Position and Condensed Statement of Income and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          86,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  196,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,966
<INVENTORY>                                    160,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               483,245
<PP&E>                                         701,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                 357,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 952,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          249,409
<BONDS>                                        168,459
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,984
<OTHER-SE>                                     342,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   952,037
<SALES>                                        852,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               861,688
<CGS>                                          545,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  545,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 84,557
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,441
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,112
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1106-2 Transportation of liquefied and nonliquefied compressed gas cylinders; requirements. ( a ) Liquefied and nonliquefied compressed gas cylinders transported into or through an underground coal mine shall be: ( 1 ) Placed securely in devices designed to hold the cylinder in place during transit on self-propelled equipment or belt conveyors;
( 2 ) Disconnected from all hoses and gages;
( 3 ) Equipped with a metal cap or “headband” (fence-type metal protector around the valve stem) to protect the cylinder valve during transit; and,
( 4 ) Clearly labeled “empty” or “MT” when the gas in the cylinder has been expended.
( b ) In addition to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, when liquefied and nonliquefied compressed gas cylinders are transported by a trolley wire haulage system into or through an underground coal mine, such cylinders shall be placed in well insulated and substantially constructed containers which are specifically designed for holding such cylinders.
( c ) Liquefied and nonliquefied compressed gas cylinders shall not be transported on mantrips.
[36 FR 22061, Nov. 19, 1971]
#### Madeline B. O’Malley, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward O’Malley, Deceased, Respondent, v. City of New York, Defendant, and Michael Painter et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendants Michael Painter and Catherine Clark appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 22, 1961 upon the jury’s verdict after trial, as is in favor of the plaintiff and against said defendants. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to abide the event; new trial ordered as between the plaintiff and said defendants only; and action severed as to the defendant City of New York. In our opinion, the learned Trial Justice erred in excluding the Medical Examiner’s report, and in refusing to recess the trial for a reasonable period of time to await the arrival of the Medical Examiner who had been subpoenaed as a witness and was on his way to court. We are also of the opinion that the learned Trial Justice unduly participated in the trial, and that inadvertently he may have indicated to the jury a hostile attitude toward the defendants’ ease. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet dated September 30, 1999 and its
Consolidated Statement of Operations covering the period from October 1,
1998 to September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statement and notes thereof.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          258263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   204492
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    6768573
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         2650008
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1382678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9251262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        2521154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5918
<OTHER-SE>                                     6199296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9251262
<SALES>                                        2316526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2316526
<CGS>                                           892092
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   892092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1533976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              168351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (183441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (183441)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (183441)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)



</TABLE>