alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                            | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION | OWNERSHIP |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|-----------|
|                                                          |                          |      |
| South American Mining & Exploration Corp.                 | British Columbia, Canada      | 100%      |
| SAMEX International Ltd.                                      | Bahamas                       | 100%      |
| SAMEX S.A.                                                    | Bolivia                       | 98%       |
| Minas Bolivex S.A. (“BOLIVEX “)                   | Bolivia                       | 98%       |
| Empresa Minera Boliviana S.A. (“EMIBOL”)          | Bolivia                       | 98%       |
| Minera Samex Chile S.A  (“Samex Chile”) | Chile                         | 99.9%     |

----
```

Authorization

The undersigned hereby appoints each of Peter Pounds, Lynda Tarbath, Bryan Fick, and Carren Walters, signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on the behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4 and Form 5 in accordance with section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4 and Form 5, complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in-fact's discretion.

    The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully  do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted.  The undersigned acknowledges that the foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the undersigned's responsibilities to comply with section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

    This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4 and Form 5, with respect to the undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company' unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be executed effective as of February 24, 2014.

/s/ Wilson Hughes
Signature

Wilson Hughes
Print Name

State of Alaska    )
Third Judicial District    ) ss.

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 24th day of February, 2014 by Wilson Hughes.

/s/ Tessa Holcomb
Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska

My commission expires: February 12, 2018

[SEAL]
```
#### GIBSON v. UNITED STATES.

No. 11176.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 19, 1954.

Decided April 7, 1954.

*426Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Thomas E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (W. Wilson White, U. S. Atty., Springer H. Moore, Jr., Rowland C. Evans, Jr., Krusen, Evans & Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit in admiralty brought by a seaman (now deceased) against the United States as owner and operator of the vessel upon which through a succession of heart attacks he became disabled. The liability of the United States is alleged by the libellant to be predicated upon an unseaworthy throttle, the use of which was asserted to have brought on one of the attacks, upon the negligence of the master of the vessel in failing to provide proper care and attention for the libellant, and, finally, upon the negligence of a medical officer of the United States Public Health Service in improperly advising the master as to the treatment to be given to libellant. It appeared that in a prior suit by the libellant against the general agent of the vessel based upon the alleged unseaworthiness of the vessel and the negligence of the master a verdict was rendered in favor of the defendant and judgment was entered thereon. Gibson v. International Freighting Corporation, 3 Cir., 1949, 173 F.2d 591, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 832, 70 S.Ct. 78, 94 L.Ed. 507. In the present case the district court, after hearing, dismissed the libel, holding that the judgment against the libellant in his prior suit against the general agent rendered the issues of unseaworthiness and negligence of the master res judicata and that the treatment prescribed for the libellant by the medical officer of the Public Health Service was not inconsistent with good medical practice. In view of these conclusions the district court did not pass upon the respondents' contention that the libellant’s tort claim against the United States based on the negligence of the medical officer of the Public Health Service could not be asserted in a libel filed under the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 741 et seq.

 We are satisfied that the libel was rightly dismissed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Judge Kalodner. 112 F.Supp. 855. The conclusion that the first two issues were res judicata was compelled by the rule laid down in Bruszewski v. United States, 3 Cir., 1950, 181 F.2d 419, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 865, 71 S.Ct. 87, 95 L.Ed. 632. The conclusion that the medical officer of the Public Health Service was not guilty of negligence necessarily follows from the court’s finding that the treatment which he prescribed for the libellant was not inconsistent with good medical practice. While there was a conflict in the medical testimony there was substantial support in the testimony for such a finding and we cannot say that it was erroneous.

The decree of the district court will be affirmed.
#### Daniel W. Ford, Assignee, etc., Appellant, *v.*The Union National Bank of Albany, Respondent.

(Argued March 21, 1882;

decided April 11, 1882.)

*Edga/r L. Fursmam,*for appellant.

*Samuel Hand*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Andrews, Oh. J., and Tracy, J., absent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute against plaintiff.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1400-4 Certifications and records of daily examinations.

At the completion of each daily examination required by § 75.1400, the person making the examination shall certify, by signature and date, that the examination has been made. If any unsafe condition is found during the examinations required by § 75.1400-3, the person conducting the examination shall make a record of the condition and the date. Certifications and records shall be retained for one year.

[48 FR 53239, Nov. 25, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 33723, June 29, 1995]
### SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

The provisions of this subchapter and chapter 7 of this title were originally enacted by act June 11, 1946, ch. 324, 60 Stat. 237, popularly known as the "Administrative Procedure Act". That Act was repealed as part of the general revision of this title by Pub. L. 89–554 and its provisions incorporated into this subchapter and chapter 7 hereof.
§ 196.435 Employment assistance to students. ( a ) *Assistance by recipient in making available outside employment.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making employment available to any of its students: ( 1 ) Shall assure itself that such employment is made available without discrimination on the basis of sex; and
( 2 ) Shall not render such services to any agency, organization, or person that discriminates on the basis of sex in its employment practices.
( b ) *Employment of students by recipients.* A recipient that employs any of its students shall not do so in a manner that violates §§ 196.500 through 196.550.
#### § 77.704-3 Work on energized high-voltage surface lines; reporting.

Any operator designating and assigning qualified persons to perform repairs on energized high-voltage surface lines under the provisions of § 77.704-2 shall maintain a record of such repairs. Such record shall contain a notation of the time, date, location, and general nature of the repairs made together with a copy of the information filed with the operator by the qualified person designated as responsible for performing such repairs.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1001 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1001

   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that former 
 President Donald J. Trump did not engage in insurrection or rebellion 
   against the United States, or give aid or comfort to the enemies 
                                thereof.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2024

 Mr. Gaetz (for himself, Ms. Greene of Georgia, Mr. Ogles, Mrs. Luna, 
    Mr. Collins, Mr. Hunt, Mr. Posey, Ms. Hageman, Mr. Steube, Mr. 
Rosendale, Mr. Burlison, Mr. Crane, Mr. Fry, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, 
Mr. Mooney, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Palmer, Mr. Nehls, 
Mr. Brecheen, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mrs. Harshbarger, Mr. Cloud, Mr. 
    Gooden of Texas, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. 
Armstrong, Mr. Bost, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. Carter of Texas, Mr. Banks, 
  Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Babin, Mr. Waltz, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Rose, Mr. 
Mann, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. Mills, Ms. Boebert, Mr. Alford, Mr. Bilirakis, 
Mr. Williams of Texas, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, Mr. Moore of Alabama, 
 Mr. Self, Mr. Mast, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Fallon, Mr. Jackson 
 of Texas, Mr. Clyde, Mrs. Lesko, Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Harris, 
    Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Bishop of North 
  Carolina, Mr. Timmons, Mrs. McClain, Mr. Burchett, Mr. Norman, Mr. 
 Davidson, Mr. Huizenga, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Walberg, and 
 Mr. Strong) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that former 
 President Donald J. Trump did not engage in insurrection or rebellion 
   against the United States, or give aid or comfort to the enemies 
                                thereof.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
former President Donald J. Trump did not engage in insurrection or 
rebellion against the United States, or give aid or comfort to the 
enemies thereof.
                                 <all>
```
### §2053. Voluntary retirement

(a) A participant who is at least 50 years of age and has completed 20 years of service may, on the participant's application and with the consent of the Director, be retired from the Agency and receive benefits in accordance with the provisions of section 2031 of this title if the participant has not less than 10 years of service with the Agency.

(b) A participant who has at least 25 years of service, ten years of which are with the Agency, may retire, with the consent of the Director, at any age and receive benefits in accordance with the provisions of section 2031 of this title if the Office of Personnel Management has authorized separation from service voluntarily for Agency employees under section 8336(d)(2) of title 5 with respect to the Civil Service Retirement System or section 8414(b)(1)(B) of such title with respect to the Federal Employees' Retirement System.

(Pub. L. 88–643, title II, §233, as added Pub. L. 102–496, title VIII, §802, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3225; amended Pub. L. 103–36, §3, June 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 106.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 233 of Pub. L. 88–643, title II, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1048, related to voluntary retirement and was set out as a note under section 403 of this title prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 88–643 by section 802 of Pub. L. 102–496.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–36 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of fourth month beginning after Oct. 24, 1992, see section 805 of Pub. L. 102–496, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
Exhibit 99-2





Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United States Code





I, Michael Smith, the chief financial officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.





/S/    MICHAEL SMITH





Michael Smith


November 14, 2002
#### § 1602.24 Claim.

A *claim* is a request for postponement of induction or classification into a class other than 1-A.

[52 FR 24454, July 1, 1987]
#### John Welter *vs.*City of St. Paul.

May 13, 1889.

Municipal Corporation — Negligence of Officers in Charge of Street Improvements. — Where a municipal corporation has under its charter the care and control of the public streets, and has general authority to make or cau&e to be made improvements therein, such as sewers or drains, it is liable for injuries to its employes or others, resulting from the negligence of its officers or agents, acting under its authority in making such improvements, and having the charge and supervision thereof, though in ■ the particular instance, in strict conformity to its charter, the work is required to be done by contract, and not directly by the corporation.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, *Simons,*J., presiding, overruling its demurrer to the complaint.

*W. P. Murray,*for appellant.

*James E. Markham,*for respondent.

Vanderburgh, J.

This case comes here upon appeal from an order overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. The complaint shows that the plaintiff was employed as a laborer by the defendant in-working on the streets. The city had caused an excavation or trench to be made in one of the streets for a sewer or drain, and carelessly neglected to brace or protect the sides of the same to prevent the earth from caving in, so that it was a dangerous place to work in. The plaintiff was subject to the orders of the defendant’s agent or foreman in charge of the work, and by his direction went to work in the sewer, and, without notice of its dangerous condition, was injured by the caving in of earth, and' stones upon him. The complaint states a cause of action. The city has the care and control of the streets, and is charged with the duty and has general authority to make improvements therein, and to construct sewers and drains. These are corporate powers and duties, and it is liable for its negligence, or the negligence of its officers, in the exercise of such powers and the performance of such duties. It is true that, under the charter of the city, improvements, where the costs exceed $200, *461are to be made under contract with the lowest bidder, but it does not appear that this work was not such as the city itself might undertake in strict conformity with the charter, or that it was not a mere local drain for a street improvement; and, even if its proceedings were not regular in this respect, yet, being a municipal improvement which it might within its general authority cause to be made, and which as it is alleged was in this instance in fact made by it, it will be held liable for injuries resulting to its servants or others resulting from the negligence of its authorized agents in executing the work. In other words, it cannot be permitted to set up the plea of *ult?’a*vires, if the work was authorized by it, and was within the scope of its corporate power or authority to act in reference to it under any circumstances. 2 Dill. Mun. Corp. § 968.

Order affirmed.
#### Philip J. Stroka, Respondent, v Kendra D. Hancock, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 836]—

Appeal from a judgment of the Chautauqua County Court (John T. Ward, J.), entered May 2, 2006. The judgment, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in amended decision at County Court. Present— Hurlbutt, J.E, Gorski, Smith, Fahey and Green, JJ.
### §1205. Transmittal of information to Congress

Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any rule, regulation or policy directive, any member of the Board, or any employee of the Board designated by the Board, may transmit to the Congress on the request of any committee or subcommittee thereof, by report, testimony, or otherwise, information and views on functions, responsibilities, or other matters relating to the Board, without review, clearance, or approval by any other administrative authority.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title II, §202(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1131, §1209(a); renumbered §1205 and amended Pub. L. 101–12, §3(a)(9), Apr. 10, 1989, 103 Stat. 18.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1205 was renumbered section 1204 of this title.

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–12 renumbered section 1209(a) of this title as this section and inserted section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1989 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–12 effective 90 days following Apr. 10, 1989, see section 11 of Pub. L. 101–12, set out as a note under section 1201 of this title.
### §111. Same; taxation affecting Federal employees; income tax

(a) General Rule.—The United States consents to the taxation of pay or compensation for personal service as an officer or employee of the United States, a territory or possession or political subdivision thereof, the government of the District of Columbia, or an agency or instrumentality of one or more of the foregoing, by a duly constituted taxing authority having jurisdiction, if the taxation does not discriminate against the officer or employee because of the source of the pay or compensation.

(b) Treatment of Certain Federal Employees Employed at Federal Hydroelectric Facilities Located on the Columbia River.—Pay or compensation paid by the United States for personal services as an employee of the United States at a hydroelectric facility—

(1) which is owned by the United States;

(2) which is located on the Columbia River; and

(3) portions of which are within the States of Oregon and Washington,

shall be subject to taxation by the State or any political subdivision thereof of which such employee is a resident.

(c) Treatment of Certain Federal Employees Employed at Federal Hydroelectric Facilities Located on the Missouri River.—Pay or compensation paid by the United States for personal services as an employee of the United States at a hydroelectric facility—

(1) which is owned by the United States;

(2) which is located on the Missouri River; and

(3) portions of which are within the States of South Dakota and Nebraska,

shall be subject to taxation by the State or any political subdivision thereof of which such employee is a resident.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §2(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 608; amended Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1075(b)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2138.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 84a | Apr. 12, 1939, ch. 59, §4, 53 Stat. 575. |

Statutes at Large

The words "received after December 31, 1938," are omitted as obsolete. The words "pay or" are added before "compensation" for clarity as the word "pay" is used throughout title 5, United States Code, to refer to the remuneration, salary, wages, or compensation for the personal services of a Federal employee. The word "territory" is not capitalized as there are no longer any "Territories." The words "to tax such compensation" are omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–261 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsecs. (b) and (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1075(b)(2), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2139, provided that: "The amendment made by this subsection [amending this section] shall apply to pay and compensation paid after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 1998]."
### §307107. Donations and bequests of money, personal property, and less than fee interests in historic property

(a) Money and Personal Property.—The Secretary may accept donations and bequests of money and personal property for the purposes of this division and shall hold, use, expend, and administer the money and personal property for those purposes.

(b) Less Than Fee Interest in Historic Property.—The Secretary may accept gifts or donations of less than fee interests in any historic property where the acceptance of an interest will facilitate the conservation or preservation of the historic property. Nothing in this section or in any provision of this division shall be construed to affect or impair any other authority of the Secretary under other provision of law to accept or acquire any property for conservation or preservation or for any other purpose.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3232.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 307107 | 16 U.S.C. 470w–2. | Pub. L. 89–665, title III, §303, as added Pub. L. 96–515, title V, §501, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3002. |

Section
§ 556.700 May I assign or sublease all or any part of the record title interest in my lease? ( a ) With BOEM approval, you may assign your whole, or a partial record title interest in your entire lease, or in any aliquot(s) thereof.
( b ) With BOEM approval, you may sever all, or a portion of, your operating rights.
( c ) You must request approval of each assignment of a record title interest and each sublease of an operating rights interest. Each instrument that transfers a record title interest must describe, by aliquot parts, the interest you propose to transfer. Each instrument that severs an operating rights interest must describe, by officially designated aliquot parts and depth levels, the interest proposed to be transferred.