alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Marilyn Oser, Appellant, v Michael Oser, Respondent.

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 24, 1978, which, *inter alia,*(1) awarded alimony of $25 per week, (2) awarded child support of $75 per week and (3) failed to provide for advance notice of visitation on Sundays. Judgment modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, by (1) increasing the alimony award to $75 per week and (2) adding thereto a provision requiring the defendant to give the plaintiff 72 hours’ notice of his intention to exercise his right of visitation on Sundays. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the plaintiff. On the record presented we find that the award of $25 per week is inadequate for the support of the plaintiff and therefore it should be increased to the extent indicated. The provision regarding notice of the defendant’s intent to exercise his right of visitation on Sundays is reasonable and necessary to permit the plaintiff to plan her weekends. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
# C_2008116EN.01003102.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/31

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Valero Jordana v Commission

(Case F-104/05) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - 2004 promotion exercise - Award of priority points - Temporal application of provisions of the new Staff Regulations)

(2008/C 116/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gregorio Valero Jordana (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Merola and I. van Schendel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, Agents, assisted by D. Slater, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission's decision awarding priority points to the applicant under the 2004 promotion exercise and of the decision not to promote him to Grade A*12 under that exercise

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision setting Mr Valero Jordana's total number of points at the end of the 2004 promotion exercise and the decision not to promote him under that exercise; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision setting Mr Valero Jordana's total number of points at the end of the 2004 promotion exercise and the decision not to promote him under that exercise;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 14.1.2006, p. 27 (Case initially registered at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under T-394/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15 December 2005).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>
        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>             JAN-03-1999
<CASH>                                               150,472
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          3,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                            3,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     158,412
<PP&E>                                               301,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                       163,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       303,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 37,032
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                 205
<OTHER-SE>                                           256,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         303,168
<SALES>                                              361,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     375,232
<CGS>                                                 76,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        169,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       56,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                          21,547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          822
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          34,334
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          1.67
        

</TABLE>
Lander

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Rock Springs

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

SWEETWATER

UINTA

FREMONT

LUP Amendments Planning

BLM Field Office Boundary

Kemmerer Grazing

Counties

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Water

Cities

Wyoming Sage-grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Map 3-3: Livestock 

Grazing Allotments

Kemmerer Field Office

0 10 20 30 40 5

Kilometers

0 5 10 20 30 40

Miles

o
<PAGE>
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-45036) pertaining to the 1982 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-60138) pertaining to the 1992 Director
Incentive Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-
60128) pertaining to the 1992 Key Employee Stock Option Plan of Industrial
Training Corporation of our report dated February 16, 1996, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Industrial Training Corporation included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1995.



Vienna, Virginia                                               Ernst & Young LLP

February 27, 1996
### §308602. United States African-American Burial Grounds Preservation Program

(a) In General.—The Secretary shall establish within the Service, in accordance with this chapter, a program to be known as the "United States African-American Burial Grounds Preservation Program".

(b) Duties of Secretary.—In carrying out the Program, the Secretary, in consultation with the National Trust for Historic Preservation and members of the African-American heritage community, shall develop a program for the provision of grants in accordance with section 308603(a).

(c) Donations.—The Secretary may accept monetary donations to further the purposes of this chapter.

(d) Consent of Private Property Owner Required.—Burial grounds shall only be considered for a grant under the Program—

(1) with the consent of the property owner; and

(2) at the request of an individual, landowner, private or nonprofit organization, State, Tribal, or local government, or other entity.

(Added Pub. L. 117–328, div. DD, title VI, §643(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5613.)
### §303101. Establishment

To carry out this division (except chapter 3041) and chapter 3121, there is established in the Treasury the Historic Preservation Fund.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3206.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 303101 | 16 U.S.C. 470h (1st paragraph). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §108 (1st paragraph), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 917; Pub. L. 91–243, §1(a), May 9, 1970, 84 Stat. 204; Pub. L. 93–54, §1(a), July 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 139; Pub. L. 94–422, title II, §201(4), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1320. |

Section

The words "(except chapter 3041) and chapter 3121" are added for clarity. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation does not receive amounts from the Fund. The National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States does receive amounts.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31397]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

 Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE AND TIME:  Friday, December 17, 2010, 11 a.m.

PLACE:  Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT:  Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. The BBG will hear a Middle East 
trip report, a report from the Board's Budget and Strategy Committee, 
and a report from the Chairman of the International Broadcasting Bureau 
Coordinating Committee on distribution/technology. The meeting is open 
to public observation via streamed Web cast, both live and on-demand, 
on the BBG's public Web site at http://www.bbg.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-31397 Filed 12-9-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```
#### § 947.846 Individual civil penalties.

Part 846 of this chapter, *Individual Civil Penalties,* shall apply to the assessment of individual civil penalties under section 518(f) of the Act.

[53 FR 3676, Feb. 8, 1988]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999 for May Litmited  Partnership 1984-3 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000765946
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         103
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  97
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               200
<PP&E>                                         165
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          88
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   365
<SALES>                                        348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               353
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  55
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                212
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            212
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   212
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
§ 875.14 Eligible lands and water after certification. ( a ) Following certification, eligible noncoal lands, waters, and facilities are those— ( 1 ) Which were mined or processed for minerals or which were affected by such mining or processing, and abandoned or left in an inadequate reclamation status before August 3, 1977. However, for Federal lands, waters, and facilities under the jurisdiction of the Forest Service, the eligibility date is August 28, 1974. For Federal lands, waters and facilities under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, the eligibility date is November 26, 1980; and
( 2 ) For which there is no continuing reclamation responsibility under State or other Federal laws.
( b ) If eligible coal problems are found or occur after certification, you must submit to us a plan that describes the approach and funds that will be used to address those problems in a timely manner. You may address any eligible coal problems with the certified in lieu funds that you have already received or will receive from § 872.32 of this chapter. You may also use the prior balance replacement funds received from § 872.29 of this chapter to address coal problems subsequent to certification. Any coal reclamation projects that you do must conform to sections 401 through 410 of SMCRA and part 874 of this chapter.
[73 FR 67640, Nov. 14, 2008]
### Chronological narrative of the 1969-71 Mauna Ulu eruption of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii

By: Donald A. SwansonW. A. DuffieldD. B. JacksonD. W. Peterson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1056

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Rita Stabile, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. M-4477.)

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims. Claimant alleges that on July 29, 1956 she was injured while roller skating in a State park. A claim was not filed within 90 days of accrual of the action (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd. 3), and a motion for permission for late filing within the permissive authorization of subdivision 5 of section 10 has been denied by the Court of Claims. Motion for permission to file the claim was made October 21, 1957, about 15 months after the accident, and six months after the elapse of the time set up in subdivision 5. The test provided by this subdivision is not a physical or mental inability to file the claim; but rather a “ reasonable excuse ” for not filing it on time. (Compare General Municipal Law, § 50-e; e,g. *Bloom*v. *State of New York,*5 A D 2d 930; *Matter of Osborn*v. *Board of Educ.,*5 A D 2d 929.) Although claimant does not show an excuse based on a complete physical disability; or an excuse based on an entirely unavoidable condition or circumstance, she does meet the test of reasonableness in showing why the claim *699was not filed earlier. She suffered a concussion of the brain, low back sprain and contusions; and her physician said that she had severe dizziness and frequent blackouts and lapses of memory. She was hospitalized twice. Her doctor swears that she asked him about consulting a lawyer several times in 1956 and he advised she postpone this because in his opinion it would aggravate her condition. The State claims prejudice; but it shows no report of the accident, although claimant presented proof that it was immediately reported to an official in charge of the skating area. The delay of six months beyond the nine-month period has not, in these circumstances, been shown to have prejudiced the State. On the general judicial policy on this subject, see *Bloom*v. *State of New York*(5 A D 2d 930, supra); *Rugg*v. *State of New York*(278 App. Div. 216, revd. 303 N. Y. 361; reconsidered 279 App. Div. 810); and *Lawrence*v. *State of New York*(281 App. Div. 922). Order reversed on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion; and motion granted, with $10 costs. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson and Herlihy, JJ., concur; Reynolds, J., dissents, and votes to affirm.
### §4566. Prohibition on purchase of United States defense contractors by entities controlled by foreign governments

#### (a) In general

No entity controlled by a foreign government may merge with, acquire, or take over a company engaged in interstate commerce in the United States that—

(1) is performing a Department of Defense contract, or a Department of Energy contract under a national security program, that cannot be performed satisfactorily unless that company is given access to information in a proscribed category of information; or

(2) during the previous fiscal year, was awarded—

(A) Department of Defense prime contracts in an aggregate amount in excess of $500,000,000; or

(B) Department of Energy prime contracts under national security programs in an aggregate amount in excess of $500,000,000.

#### (b) Inapplicability to certain cases

The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply if a merger, acquisition, or takeover is not suspended or prohibited pursuant to section 4565 of this title.

#### (c) Definitions

In this section:

(1) The term "entity controlled by a foreign government" includes—

(A) any domestic or foreign organization or corporation that is effectively owned or controlled by a foreign government; and

(B) any individual acting on behalf of a foreign government,

as determined by the President.

(2) The term "proscribed category of information" means a category of information that—

(A) with respect to Department of Defense contracts—

(i) includes special access information;

(ii) is determined by the Secretary of Defense to include information the disclosure of which to an entity controlled by a foreign government is not in the national security interests of the United States; and

(iii) is defined in regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for the purposes of this section; and

(B) with respect to Department of Energy contracts—

(i) is determined by the Secretary of Energy to include information described in subparagraph (A)(ii); and

(ii) is defined in regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Energy for the purposes of this section.

(Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title VIII, §835, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2461.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 2170a of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, and not as part of the Defense Production Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.
EXHIBIT 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
  In
connection with the annual report of Energroup Holdings Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Sharon Tang, Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.
   Date:
      June 16, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Sharon TangSharon
      TangChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §5503. Recess appointments

(a) Payment for services may not be made from the Treasury of the United States to an individual appointed during a recess of the Senate to fill a vacancy in an existing office, if the vacancy existed while the Senate was in session and was by law required to be filled by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, until the appointee has been confirmed by the Senate. This subsection does not apply—

(1) if the vacancy arose within 30 days before the end of the session of the Senate;

(2) if, at the end of the session, a nomination for the office, other than the nomination of an individual appointed during the preceding recess of the Senate, was pending before the Senate for its advice and consent; or

(3) if a nomination for the office was rejected by the Senate within 30 days before the end of the session and an individual other than the one whose nomination was rejected thereafter receives a recess appointment.

(b) A nomination to fill a vacancy referred to by paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a) of this section shall be submitted to the Senate not later than 40 days after the beginning of the next session of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 475.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 56. | R.S. §1761.July 11, 1940, ch. 580, 54 Stat. 751. |

Statutes at Large

July 11, 1940, ch. 580, 54 Stat. 751.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
#### § 147.22 Transferability.

Investigations that satisfy the requirements of a given standard and are current meet the investigative requirements for all levels specified for the standard. They shall be mutually and reciprocally accepted by all agencies.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm in the Registration Statement of Genesys
S.A. on Form S-8 pertaining to the Amended and Restated Genesys Stock Incentive
Plan and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated May 12,
2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Genesys S.A., which
appears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 15, 2003.

Montpellier, July 22, 2003


Ernst & Young Audit

/s/ Antoine Peskine
-------------------
Antoine Peskine