alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §101918. Transfer or conveyance of concession contracts or leasehold surrender interests

(a) Approval of Secretary.—No concession contract or leasehold surrender interest may be transferred, assigned, sold, or otherwise conveyed or pledged by a concessioner without prior written notification to, and approval by, the Secretary.

(b) Conditions.—The Secretary shall approve a transfer or conveyance described in subsection (a) unless the Secretary finds that—

(1) the individual, corporation, or other entity seeking to acquire a concession contract is not qualified or able to satisfy the terms and conditions of the concession contract;

(2) the transfer or conveyance would have an adverse impact on—

(A) the protection, conservation, or preservation of the resources of the System unit; or

(B) the provision of necessary and appropriate facilities and services to visitors at reasonable rates and charges; and

(3) the terms of the transfer or conveyance are likely, directly or indirectly, to—

(A) reduce the concessioner's opportunity for a reasonable profit over the remaining term of the concession contract;

(B) adversely affect the quality of facilities and services provided by the concessioner; or

(C) result in a need for increased rates and charges to the public to maintain the quality of the facilities and services.

(c) Modification or Renegotiation of Terms.—The terms and conditions of any concession contract under this section shall not be subject to modification or open to renegotiation by the Secretary because of a transfer or conveyance described in subsection (a) unless the transfer or conveyance would have an adverse impact as described in subsection (b)(2).

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3147.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101918 | 16 U.S.C. 5957. | Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §408, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3512. |

Section

In subsection (b)(1), the word "other" is added for consistency in the subchapter. See section 101926 of the revised title.
**Exhibit 99-2**



SOCIAL
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT



---

# BULLETIN N° 189 / 2004

---



DATE: 08/ 17/ 2004

**PEMEX ISSUES AN INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC BID FOR THE MONCLOVA AND PIRINEO BLOCKS WITHIN THE BURGOS BASIN**

| | • |  | **Those interested should present their economic-technical offers in November**
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • |  | **Both blocks shall have an execution term of 5,478 natural days**             

In
the Official Gazette of the Federation it was published today the international public
call for bids N° 030. Through this call for bids, Petróleos Mexicanos invites
domestic and foreign companies to participate in the second round of the Multiple Services
Contracts for the execution of works related to the development, infrastructure and
maintenance of non-associated gas fields, corresponding to the Monclova and Pirineo blocks
within the Burgos Basin.

PEMEX
issued said call for bids according to the Law for Public Works and Related Services
Thereof and under the headings of public sector purchases of the free trade agreements
subscribed by Mexico.

In
the international public bids it is established that the works to be performed in both
blocks shall have an execution term of 5,478 natural days. Those interested will be able
to visit the working areas of the Monclova and Pirineo blocks on August 26 and 27,
respectively.

The
basis of this call for bids stipulate that all participants should have a net worth of 58
million pesos, as well as accredited experience and technical and financial capacity
according to the regulations of the Public Works Law.

The
presentation of offers and technical opening for the Monclova block shall take place
November 16 of this year, and the opening act of the economic offers shall take place two
days later.

Regarding
the Pirineo block, the interested entities should submit their technical offers on
November 23 and the economic offers on November 25 of this year.

After
evaluating the submitted offers, PEMEX shall award the contract to that company or
consortium that meets the legal, technical and economic requirements, and fulfills the
respective obligations.

Additionally,
if two or more solvent offers result, because they entirely satisfy the requirements
requested by PEMEX, the contract shall be awarded to the entity that presents the offer
with the lowest price.

The
bidding basis of these blocks shall be available for consultation and sale at the
purchasenet web page, as well as at the Executive Management for Multiple
Services Contracts of Pemex- Exploration and Production.

********
§ 1624.1 Random selection procedures for induction. ( a ) The Director of Selective Service shall from time to time establish a random selection sequence for induction by a drawing to be conducted in the place and on a date the Director shall fix. The random selection method shall use 365 days, or when appropriate, 366 days to represent the birthdays (month and day only) of all registrants who, during the specified calendar year(s) attain their 18th year of birth. The drawing, commencing with the first day selected, and continuing until all 365 days or, when appropriate 366 days are drawn, shall be accomplished impartially. The random sequence number thus determined for any registrant shall apply to him so long as he remains subject to induction for military training and service by random selection.
( b ) The date of birth of the registrant that appears on his Selective Service Registration Record on the day before the lottery is conducted to establish his random selection sequence will be conclusive as to his date of birth in all matters pertaining to his relations with the Selective Service System.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

**IMCLONESYSTEMS INCORPORATEDRATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(in thousands)**

| ** **                                                       | ** ** | **Year Ended** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                       | ** ** | **2005**            | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** |
| Income (loss)  before taxes                                      |       | $                   | 88,074     |   | $ | 131,014 |   | $ | (112,011 | ) | $ | (157,224 | ) | $ | (127,607 | ) |
| Add:                                                             |       |                |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges                                                    |       | 13,700              |       | 15,769 |   | 16,325 |   | 16,381 |   | 15,773 |   |
| Amortization of capitalized interest                             |       | 98                  |       | 98 |   | 98 |   | 98 |   | 49 |   |
| Less:                                                            |       |                |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest capitalized during the period                           |       | 5,394               |       | 6,087 |   | 6,059 |   | 2,077 |   | 1,656 |   |
| Income (loss) before income taxes, as  adjusted                  |       | $                   | 96,478     |   | $ | 140,794 |   | $ | (101,647 | ) | $ | (142,822 | ) | $ | (113,441 | ) |
| Fixed Charges:                                                   |       |                |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest (gross), including amortization of debt  issuance costs |       | 11,963              |       | 14,520 |   | 15,184 |   | 15,256 |   | 15,252 |   |
| Portion of rent representative of the interest factor       |       | 1,737               |       | 1,249 |   | 1,141 |   | 1,125 |   | 521 |   |
| Fixed charges                                                    |       | $                   | 13,700     |   | $ | 15,769 |   | $ | 16,325 |   | $ | 16,381 |   | $ | 15,773 |   |
| Deficiency of earnings available to cover fixed charges     |       | $                   | —     |   | $ | — |   | $ | (117,972 | ) | $ | (159,203 | ) | $ | (129,214 | ) |
| Ratio of earnings to  fixed charges                              |       | 7.0:1               |       | 8.9:1 |   | — |   | — |   | — |   |

 

----
#### Sophie Schmid, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, *v.*Hugh J. Jewett, as Receiver, etc., Appellant.

(Argued January *24,*1882;

decided February 7, 1882.)

*John O. Milium*for appellant.

*A. 6. Rice*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; .no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR SECOND QUARTER OF 1999 AND 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCES TO SUCH DIVERSIFIED MARKETING SERVICES, INC.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,393                   4,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,393                   4,800
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,393                   4,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        11,250                     250
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,248)                   4,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,393                   4,800
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,407                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,407)                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,407)                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,407)                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00                     .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00                     .00



</TABLE>
H. Res. 1009 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 14, 2024. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 7176) to 

repeal restrictions on the export and import of natural gas. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 

amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
### §1202. Term of office; filling vacancies; removal

(a) The term of office of each member of the Merit Systems Protection Board is 7 years.

(b) A member appointed to fill a vacancy occurring before the end of a term of office of the member's predecessor serves for the remainder of that term. Any appointment to fill a vacancy is subject to the requirements of section 1201. Any new member serving only a portion of a seven-year term in office may continue to serve until a successor is appointed and has qualified, except that such member may not continue to serve for more than one year after the date on which the term of the member would otherwise expire, unless reappointed.

(c) Any member appointed for a 7-year term may not be reappointed to any following term but may continue to serve beyond the expiration of the term until a successor is appointed and has qualified, except that such member may not continue to serve for more than one year after the date on which the term of the member would otherwise expire under this section.

(d) Any member may be removed by the President only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title II, §202(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1122; amended Pub. L. 100–202, §101(m) [title VI, §620], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–390, 1329–427; Pub. L. 101–12, §3(a)(2), (3), Apr. 10, 1989, 103 Stat. 17.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–12, §3(a)(2), substituted a semicolon for the comma after "office" in section catchline.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–12, §3(a)(3), substituted "the member's" for "his" in first sentence and struck out "of this title" after "section 1201" in second sentence.

1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–202 inserted provision permitting any new member serving portion of seven-year term to continue serving until successor is appointed and has qualified, with exception limiting duration of such service.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1989 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–12 effective 90 days following Apr. 10, 1989, see section 11 of Pub. L. 101–12, set out as a note under section 1201 of this title.
#### In the Matter of El Caribe Restaurant, Inc., Petitioner, v. New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Determination of the New York State Liquor Authority unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of dismissing Charge 1 as duplicative and reducing the punishment which we find excessive to a suspension of 15 days (CPLR, § 7803, subd. 3; § 7806; *Matter of Mitthauer*V. *Patterson,*8 N Y 2d 37, 42) and, as so modified, confirmed, without costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
§ 1662.15 FOIA Public Liaison and the Office of Government Information Services. The Chief FOIA Officer notifies requesters of their right to seek dispute resolution from the FOIA Public Liaison or OGIS within the SSS fee notices, responses to determinations identified in § 1662.9(a), and responses to appeals. ( a ) *FOIA Public Liaison.* If requesters have questions about the response to their request or wish to seek dispute resolutions services within SSS, the requester may contact the FOIA Public Liaison via email to *FOIA.Public.Liaison@sss.gov*.
( b ) *OGIS.* OGIS is an entity outside of SSS that offers mediation services to resolve disputes between FOIA requesters and Federal agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. OGIS' contact information will be provided in any decision letter issued by the Chief FOIA Officer and Director of Selective Service.
#### § 762.15 Exploration on land designated as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.

Designation of any area as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations pursuant to section 522 of the Act and regulations of this subchapter does not prohibit coal exploration operations in the area, if conducted in accordance with the Act, this chapter, any approved State or Federal program, and other applicable requirements. Exploration operations on any lands designated unsuitable for surface coal mining operations must be approved by the regulatory authority under part 772 of this chapter, to ensure that exploration does not interfere with any value for which the area has been designated unsuitable for surface coal mining.

[48 FR 41350, Sept. 14, 1983. Redesignated at 64 FR 70837, Dec. 17, 1999]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, James J. Houtz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sionix Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date") and

         c. Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 13, 2004                         /S/ JAMES J. HOUTZ
                                               ------------------
                                             James J. Houtz, President
374 A.2d 105.

#### Dorothy H. Stewart *vs.*David R. McGovern, *in his capacity as Treasurer of the City of Providence*

JUNE 16, 1977.

Present: Bevilaequa, C. J., Paolino. Joslin, Kelleher and Doris, JJ.

*406Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this civil action against the defendant, in his capacity as treasurer of the city of Providence, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on November 9, 1971, as a result of a fall on an allegedly defective sidewalk on Broad Street. A jury in the Superior Court returned a verdict finding that the plaintiff had suffered total damages in the amount of $6,000, but, in reply to interrogatories put to them under our comparative negligence statute, G.L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment) §9-20-4, the jury attributed 90 percent of the negligence to the city and 10 percent to the plaintiff. The damages were diminished accordingly and a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for $6,480. Interest is included in that amount. Thereafter the trial justice denied the defendant’s motion for a new trial and the defendant appealed.

During oral argument before us defendant expressly waived his challenge to the failure of the trial justice to give a certain instruction. Thus the only issue here relates to defendant’s contention that the trial justice was clearly wrong in denying the motion for a new trial on the *407grounds that the verdict was against the law and the evidence.

*Abedon, Stansler, Biener, Skolnik Ac, Lipsey, Howard I. Lipsey, Richard A. Skolnik,*for plaintiff.

*Louis A. Mascia,*City Solicitor, *Albert R. Ciullo,*Asst. City Solicitor, for defendant.

For defendant to succeed in his appeal he must establish that the trial justice in considering the motion for a new trial failed to perform his duty as set forth in *Barboto*v. *Epstein,*97 R.I. 191, 193-94, 196 A.2d 836, 837 (1964), or that in performing his duty he either overlooked or misconceived material evidence on a controlling issue or was otherwise clearly wrong. *Handy*v. *Geary,*105 R.I. 419, 435, 252 A.2d 435, 443 (1969). The defendant has failed to meet that burden.

Even if we assume that the trial justice failed to perform his duty in passing on the motion for a new trial, it does not follow that the defendant is automatically entitled to a new trial. In such a situation we examine the evidence ourselves in accordance with our appellate rule and sustain the verdict if there is any competent evidence which, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, supports the verdict. *Morinville*v. *Morinville,*116 R.I. 507, 516, 359 A.2d 48, 54 (1976). Here there is such evidence and therefore we affirm the trial justice’s denial of the motion for a new trial.

The defendant’s appeal is denied and dismissed and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Map 3-2: Casper Field Office

Livestock Grazing Allotments

0 10 20 30 40

Kilometers

0 10 20 30 40

Miles

1

Casper Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundaries

Casper Grazing Allotments

County Boundaries

Townships

Interstate Highways

State/US Highways

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M A P

A R E A

£¤20

¬«220

S D

N E

Douglas

Casper

Wheatland

Torrington

Thunder Basin

N.G.

§ ̈¦25

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

N

at r

o

n

a

C

o

n

v

e

r se

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

R 89 W R 88 W R 87 W R 86 W

R 85 W R 84 W R 83 W R 82 W R 81 W R 80 W R 79 W R 78 W R 77 W R 76 W R 75 W R 74 W

R 73 W R 72 W R 71 W

R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W

R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W R 62 W R 61 W R 60 W

T

19

N

T

20

N

T

21

N

T

22

N

T

23

N

T

24

N

T

25

N

T

26

N

T

27

N

T

28

N

¬«34

£¤85

£¤85

¬«487

Medicine Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

£¤26

¬«59

¬«259

¬«387

£¤20

£¤26

¬«313

¬«270

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

T

29

N

T

30

N

T

31

N

T

32

N

T

33

N

T

34

N

T

35

N

T

36

N

T

37

N

T

38

N

T

39

N

T

40

N

R 85 W

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Platte