Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 248 / Monday, December 28, 2020 / Notices 84299 

13See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty 

Order, 83 FR 37465 (August 1, 2018). 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 39531 

(July 1, 2020). 

2See Armonie’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Dry Pasta from 

Italy; C–475–819; Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated July 28, 2020; Fratelli’s Letter, 

‘‘Certain Dry Pasta from Italy; C–475–819; Request 

for Administrative Review,’’ dated July 28, 2020; 

CAMS’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Dry Pasta from Italy; C– 

475–819; Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated July 28, 2020; and Colavita’s Letter, ‘‘Certain 

Dry Pasta from Italy; C–475–819; Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated July 31, 2020. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

54983 (September 3, 2020). 

4See Colavita’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: 

Withdrawal of Request for CVD Administrative 

Review of Indalco S.p.A,’’ dated November 30, 

2020. 

5See CAMS’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Dry Pasta from Italy; 

C–475–819; Withdraw Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated December 2, 2020; Armonie’s Letter 

‘‘Certain Dry Pasta from Italy; C–475–819; 

Withdraw Request for Administrative Review’’; 

Fratelli’s Letter ‘‘Certain Dry Pasta from Italy; C– 

475–819; Withdraw Request for Administrative 

Review’’. 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the notice of final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of olives from Spain entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication as provided by section 

751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 

rate for companies subject to this review 

will be equal to the company-specific 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of the 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

a company not covered in this review 

but covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the completed segment for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established in the completed segment 

for the most recent period for the 

producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will be the all-others rate 

established in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation for this proceeding, 19.98 

percent.13 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221. 

Dated: December 18, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Requests for Withdrawal of 

Administrative Review 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Currency Conversion 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2020–28590 Filed 12–23–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–475–819] 

Certain Pasta from Italy; Rescission of 

Antidumping Administrative Review; 

2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

certain pasta from Italy for the period of 

review (POR) January 1, 2019, through 

December 31, 2019, based on the timely 

withdrawal of the requests for review. 

DATES: Applicable December 28, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Konrad Ptaszynski, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office I, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482- 6187. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2020, Commerce published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the CVD order on certain pasta 

from Italy for the period January 1, 2019 

through December 31, 2019.1 By July 31, 

2020, Commerce received timely 

requests for an administrative review 

from Armonie D’Italia S.r.l. (Armonie), 

Pastificio Fratelli De Luca S.r.l. 

(Fratelli), Pastificio C.A.M.S. S.r.l 

(CAMS), and Industria Alimentare 

Colavita, S.p.A (Colavita), in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 

351.213(b). 2 Commerce received no 

other requests for administrative review. 

On September 3, 2020, pursuant to 

these requests, and in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register initiating an administrative 

review of the CVD order on certain pasta 

from Italy.3 On November 30, 2020, 

Colavita withdrew its request for an 

administrative review.4 On December 2, 

2020, CAMS, Armonie, and Fratelli 

withdrew their requests for an 

administrative review.5

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party or parties that 

requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the 

publication date of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. 

Armonie, CAMS, Colavita, and Fratelli 

withdrew their requests within 90 days 

of the publication date of the notice of 

initiation. No other parties requested an 

administrative review of the order. 

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding the 

administrative review of the CVD order 

on certain pasta from Italy covering 

January 1, 2019, through December 31, 

2019, in its entirety. 

Assessment 

Commerce intends to instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries of pasta from Italy 

during the POR. Countervailing duties 

shall be assessed at rates equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated countervailing 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to all parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES
84300 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 248 / Monday, December 28, 2020 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

53411 (October 7, 2019). 

2 Vinh Hoan, Van Duc Food Export Joint Stock 

Company, and Van Duc Tien Giang Food Export 

Company have previously been treated as a single 

entity. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of 

Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the 

Sixth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 

and Sixth New Shipper Review, 75 FR 56062 

(September 15, 2010), unchanged in Certain Frozen 

Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Final Results of the Sixth Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Sixth New Shipper 

Review, 76 FR 15941 (March 22, 2011). We refer to 

the companies, collectively, as Vinh Hoan. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Selection of Respondents 

for Individual Review,’’ dated December 13, 2019. 

4For a detailed history of the events following 

initiation of this review, see Memorandum, 

‘‘Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Frozen Fish Fillets 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam; 2018– 

2019,’’ dated concurrently with this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Selection of Replacement 

Respondent for Individual Review,’’ dated January 

22, 2020. 

6See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

7See Appendix II for a list of companies for 

which we are rescinding this review. 

8See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for a 

complete list of companies with no shipments 

during the POR. 

9The collapsed entity includes: An Giang 

Fisheries Import and Export Joint Stock Company; 

Asia Pangasius Company Limited; Europe Joint 

Stock Company; Hung Vuong Ben Tre Seafood 

Processing Company Limited; Hung Vuong Joint 

Stock Company (aka Hung Vuong Corporation); 

Hung Vuong Mascato Company Limited; Hung 

Vuong—Sa Dec Co. Ltd.; and Hung Vuong—Vinh 

Long Co., Ltd. (collectively, HVG). See Certain 

Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments and Partial 

Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 46479 (September 13, 

2018), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM) at 4, unchanged in Certain 

Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Final Results, and Final Results of No 

Shipments of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016–2017, 84 FR 18007 (April 20, 2019). 

10As noted above, HVG is a single entity 

consisting of eight companies. 

11See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) and the 

‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below. 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: December 18, 2020. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2020–28594 Filed 12–23–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–801] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, Preliminary Determination of 

no Shipments, and Partial Rescission 

of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that certain producers and exporters of 

frozen fish fillets (fish fillets) from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) 

made sales of subject merchandise at 

prices below normal value (NV) during 

the period of review (POR) August 1, 

2018 through July 31, 2019. We also 

preliminarily determine that two 

companies are eligible for separate rate 

status, 27 companies did not establish 

eligibility for a separate rate and are part 

of the Vietnam-wide entity, and 21 

companies had no shipments during the 

POR. Finally, we are rescinding this 

review with respect to 16 companies. 

We invite interested parties to comment 

on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable December 28, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2243. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 7, 2019, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

notice of initiation of an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty (AD) 

order on fish fillets from Vietnam with 

respect to 76 companies.1 We selected 

the largest exporters, Bien Dong Seafood 

Co., Ltd. (Bien Dong) and Vinh Hoan 

Corporation (Vinh Hoan),2 as mandatory 

respondents.3 Following the withdrawal 

of all review requests for Bien Dong,4

Commerce selected Seafood Joint Stock 

Company No.4 Branch Dongtam 

Fisheries Processing Company 

(DOTASEAFOOD) as an additional 

mandatory respondent on January 22, 

2020.5

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are fish fillets from Vietnam. For a full 

description of the scope of the order, see 

the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.6

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested a review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation. As noted above, all interested 

parties timely withdrew their requests 

for review for 16 companies. 

Accordingly, Commerce is rescinding 

this review with respect to these 16 

entities, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1).7 The review will 

continue with respect to the other firms 

for which a review was requested and 

initiated. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Based on an analysis of information 

from U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) and the letters filed by 

20 companies certifying no shipments, 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that these companies had no shipments 

during the POR.8 In addition, with 

regard to an additional company, HVG,9

information on the record establishes 

that HVG had no shipments during the 

POR. For additional information 

regarding this finding, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Consistent with our assessment 

practice in non-market economy (NME) 

administrative reviews, Commerce is 

not rescinding this review for these 21 

companies,10 but intends to complete 

the review and issue appropriate 

instructions to CBP based on the final 

results of the review.11

Separate Rates 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that information placed on the record by 

mandatory respondent, Vinh Hoan, and 

separate rate applicant, Nam Viet 

Corporation (NAVICO), demonstrates 

that these companies are entitled to 

separate rate status. The remaining 27 

companies subject to this review have 

not established eligibility for a separate 

rate, and are, therefore, considered to be 

part of the Vietnam-wide entity for these 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES