alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of GPS Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
      certifies that, to his knowledge:





(i)
        The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended; and





(ii)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                November 14, 2008
            /s/ DAVID
                CHESSLERDavid
                Chessler
              Chief
                Executive Officer
EXHIBIT No. 10.41
 GREENE COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC.  CHANGE IN CONTROL PROTECTION PLAN   Participation Agreement
 Company Plan Participation Agreement William C.
Adams Employee
        (a)
    
    any severance agreement that the Employee has entered into with
the Company or any of its affiliates; and
 (b)
    
    any plan, program, or arrangement under which the Company or
any of its affiliates provides severance benefits (excluding any retirement
plan, stock-based plan, or other plan that is not a welfare plan within the
meaning of ERISA).
    nd
 The Employee:
    
    
    
    The Company:/s/ William C. Adams
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ R. Stan Puckett

A Duly Authorized Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                  462,585
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                        18,313,660
<ALLOWANCES>                         (4,809,631)
<INVENTORY>                           4,524,943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     24,109,967
<PP&E>                               69,322,369
<DEPRECIATION>                      (28,236,129)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       83,639,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                15,700,740
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                449,894
<OTHER-SE>                           12,064,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         83,639,364
<SALES>                              31,281,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     31,281,348
<CGS>                                25,319,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        25,319,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      4,586,856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    1,099,093
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         275,637
<INCOME-TAX>                            170,179
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     105,458
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            105,458
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .02
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have issued our reports dated March 1, 2011 with respect to the consolidated finan­cial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting in the Annual Report of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-78051) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-69827, No. 333-107932, No. 333-127394, No. 033-65142, No. 033-62718 and No. 033-49704).




/s/ Grant Thornton LLP











Minneapolis, Minnesota


March 1, 2011
**EXHIBIT 15**

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Morgan Stanley:

We have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information of Morgan Stanley and subsidiaries as of February 28, 2005 and for the three-month periods ended February 28, 2005 and February 29, 2004, and have issued our report dated April 4, 2005 (October 12, 2005 as to the effects of discontinued operations and segment classification discussed in Note 22) (which report included an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-based Payment”). As indicated in such report, because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

Additionally, we have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information of Morgan Stanley and subsidiaries as of May 31, 2005 and for the six-month periods ended May 31, 2005 and May 3 2004, and have issued our report dated July 7, 2005 (October 12, 2005 as to the effects of discontinued operations and segment classification discussed in Note 22) (which report included an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-based Payment”). As indicated in such report, because we did not perform an audit, WC expressed no opinion on that information.

Additionally, we have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information of Morgan Stanley and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2005 and for the nine-month periods ended August 31, 2005 and August 31, 2004, and have issued our report dated October 7, 2005 (which report included an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-based Payment”). As indicated in such report, because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our reports referred to above, which are included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2005 and in your Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 12, 2005, are being incorporated by reference in the Prospectus Supplement of MS Structured TILES Series 2006-1 for the offering of Treasury Index LinkEd Securities (TILESsm) Series 2006-1 due February 15, 2034 (which Prospectus Supplement will form part of Registration Statement No. 333-101155 of MS Structured Asset Corp. on Form S-3 in relation to the TILES Series 2006-1 securities).

We also are aware that the aforementioned reports, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, are not considered a part of the Registration Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York

February 6, 2006
### §8914. Effect of other statutes

Any provision of law outside of this chapter which provides coverage or any other benefit under this chapter to any individuals who (based on their being employed by an entity other than the Government) would not otherwise be eligible for any such coverage or benefit shall not apply with respect to any individual appointed, transferred, or otherwise commencing that type of employment on or after October 1, 1988.

(Added Pub. L. 100–238, title I, §108(a)(3)(A), Jan. 8, 1988, 101 Stat. 1747.)
#### § 22.600 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth grants officers' responsibilities relating to the award document and other actions at the time of award.
Exhibit 32.2



Section 1350 Certification of the

Chief Financial Officer



I, Michael Smith, the chief financial officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the Form
10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.



/s/    MICHAEL SMITHMichael SmithNovember 14, 2003
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2*


Section 1350 Certification


        I, Steven G. Larson, the chief financial officer of LaserCard
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certify pursuant to section
1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge:

        (i)     the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and

        (ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: February 8, 2005

/s/ Steven G. Larson
--------------------
Steven G. Larson



-----------------------

* The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed "filed" with the SEC
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.

                                       41
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1170 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1170

 Prohibiting Members of the House of Representatives from bringing or 
 displaying a flag of a foreign nation on the floor of the House, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2024

 Mrs. Cammack (for herself, Mr. Alford, Mr. Allen, Mr. D'Esposito, Mr. 
 Bilirakis, Mr. Timmons, Mr. Wenstrup, Mr. Finstad, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. 
    Van Orden, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Luttrell, Mr. Mills, Mrs. Bice, Ms. 
  Hageman, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Mr. Fry, Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mrs. 
   Luna, Mr. Harris, Mrs. Houchin, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. Collins, Mr. 
Miller of Ohio, Mr. Babin, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Ms. Mace, Mrs. Fischbach, 
    Ms. Lee of Florida, Mr. Langworthy, Ms. Maloy, and Ms. Tenney) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                                on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Prohibiting Members of the House of Representatives from bringing or 
 displaying a flag of a foreign nation on the floor of the House, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION WITH RESPECT TO FLAG OF A FOREIGN NATION ON THE 
              FLOOR OF THE HOUSE.

    (a) Prohibition.--
            (1) In general.--During a session of the House of 
        Representatives, a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner 
        may not bring or display on the floor of the House any flag of 
        a foreign nation.
            (2) Application.--Except as provided under subsection (b), 
        the prohibition under subsection (a) shall apply to a flag of a 
        foreign nation regardless of the size of the flag.
    (b) Exception.--The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not 
apply--
            (1) to a flag of a foreign nation worn as a lapel pin by a 
        Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner; or
            (2) to a depiction of a flag of a foreign nation used as 
        part of an exhibit by a Member, Delegate, or Resident 
        Commissioner during a speech or debate under the Rules of the 
        House of Representatives.
    (c) Enforcement.--The Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of 
Representatives is charged with the enforcement of the prohibition 
under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         142,818
<SECURITIES>                                   557,275
<RECEIVABLES>                                  170,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                       890
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               934,207
<PP&E>                                         186,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,299,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          470,664
<BONDS>                                          5,183
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           313
<OTHER-SE>                                     822,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,299,462
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,637,305
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,872,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               685,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   999
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,094
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                122,780
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,827
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             71,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.27
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER III—GENERAL SCHEDULE PAY RATES
§ 2002.56 Sanctions for misuse of CUI. ( a ) To the extent that agency heads are otherwise authorized to take administrative action against agency personnel who misuse CUI, agency CUI policy governing misuse should reflect that authority.
( b ) Where laws, regulations, or Government-wide policies governing certain categories or subcategories of CUI specifically establish sanctions, agencies must adhere to such sanctions.
<PAGE>
                                WILLIAM E. EHARDT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT                 
                                                              
                      
                        INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT



Board of Directors and Shareholders
Quality Resorts of America, Inc.
Fair Oaks, California


I have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Quality Resorts of America, Inc. (a California corporation), and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997 and 1996, and the related
statements of income, stockholders' equity/(deficit), and cash
flow for the fiscal years then ended.  These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. 
My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on my audit.

I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards.  Those standards require that I plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation.  I believe that my
audits provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Quality Resorts of America, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June
30, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its operations,
stockholders' equity/(deficit), and its cash flows for the years
then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.



__________________________
San Francisco, California
January 23, 1998

                             

                 45 Hoffman Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94114
                     (415)824-2012  Fax (415)695-1244
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GPS Industries,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the six  months  ended  June  30,  2005 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to GPS Industries, Inc. and
will be retained by GPS  Industries,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





                                       /s/ GEORGE DORIN
Date:  August 15, 2005           By:  ___________________________
                                       George Dorin
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Duly Authorized Officer)
#### ZAFARANO v. BAIRD.

(Supreme Court, Appellate División, First Department.

February 20, 1903.)

1. Action — Dismissal.—Unreasonable Delay.

Under Code Civ. Proc. § 822, and General Rules of Practice, No. 36, authorizing dismissal of a complaint where plaintiff unreasonably neglects to proceed in the action, an action should be dismissed; more than five years having elapsed since issue was joined and the case noticed for trial, *511during which there has been no note of issue filed, and no steps taken to bring the issue to a hearing, and there being no explanation of the delay.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by Giuseppe Zafarano against William P. Baird. From an order denying a motion for dismissal of the action on the ground that plaintiff had unreasonably neglected to prosecute it, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, O’BRIEN, INGRAHAM, and LAUGHLIN, JJ.

J. Woolsey Shepard, for appellant.

Abraham Nelson, for respondent.

LAUGHLIN, J.

The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant. The summons was served on the 27th day of July, 1897, and issue was joined on the 8th day of October of the same year. On the 29th day of October, 1897, the plaintiff noticed the action for trial for the following December term, and the defendant also noticed it for trial at that term. The plaintiff failed to file a note of issue for the term for which he noticed the case for trial, or for any subsequent term, and it has never been.placed upon the calendar. More than five years have elapsed since issue was joined and the case noticed for trial, and during this time the plaintiff has taken no steps to bring the issue to a hearing. Later similar issues have been tried. The defendant, upon affidavits showing these facts, moved for an order dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff presented no affidavit explaining his neglect to prosecute. The court denied the motion upon condition that plaintiff file a note of issue, and serve a notice of trial for the February term, 1903; and, on his failure to do so, it was ordered that the motion be granted, with $10 costs. Section 822 of the Code of Civil Procedure and rule 36 of the General Rules of Practice authorized the dismissal of a complaint where the plaintiff unreasonably neglected to proceed in the action. The defendant fairly established a prima facie case of neglect on the part of the plaintiff to proceed with the action, within this Code provision and rule, and the plaintiff was called upon to explain his apparent negligence and unreasonable neglect, or submit to a dismissal. Rule 36, General Rules of Practice; Seymour v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co., 12 App. Div. 300, 42 N. Y. Supp. 92; James v. Shea, 28 Hun, 74. The appellant’s motion, therefore, should have been granted.

It follows that the order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion for judgment dismissing the complaint, with costs, should be granted, with $10 costs. All concur.

¶

 1. See Dismissal and Nonsuit, vol. 17, Cent. Dig. § 141.