alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 174.6 LRA and the redevelopment plan. ( a ) The LRA should have broad-based membership, including, but not limited to, representatives from those jurisdictions with zoning authority over the property. Generally, there will be one recognized LRA per installation.
( b ) The LRA should focus primarily on developing a comprehensive redevelopment plan based upon local needs. The plan should recommend land uses based upon an exploration of feasible reuse alternatives. If applicable, the plan should consider notices of interest received under a base closure law. This section shall not be construed to require a plan that is enforceable under state and local land use laws, nor is it intended to create any exemption from such laws.
( c ) ( 1 ) The Secretary concerned will develop a disposal plan and, to the extent practicable, complete the appropriate environmental documentation no later than 12 months after receipt of the redevelopment plan. The redevelopment plan will be used as part of the proposed Federal action in conducting environmental analyses required under NEPA.
( 2 ) In the event there is no LRA recognized by DoD or if a redevelopment plan is not received from the LRA within 9 months from the date referred to in section 2905(b)(7)(F)(iv) of Pub. L. 101-510, (unless an extension of time has been granted by the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment)), the Secretary concerned shall, after required consultation with the governor and heads of local governments, proceed with the disposal of property under applicable property disposal and environmental laws and regulations.
# C_2008209EN.01003902.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/39

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2008 — Deutsche Post v Commission

(Case T-266/02) (1)

1

(State aid - Measures implemented by the German authorities for Deutsche Post AG - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Service of general economic interest - Compensation for additional costs generated by a policy of selling below cost in the door-to-door parcel delivery sector - No advantage)

(2008/C 209/66)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: J. Sedemund and T. Lübbig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Kreuschitz and J. Flett, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: W.-D. Plessing and M. Lumma, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant

Intervener in support of the defendant: Bundesverband Internationaler Express- und Kurierdienste eV (BIEK) (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: F. Mitzkus, T. Wambach and R. Wojtek, lawyers); and UPS Europe NV/SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially by T. Ottervanger and A. Bijleveld, and subsequently by T. Ottervanger, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2002/753/EC of 19 June 2002 on measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany for Deutsche Post AG (OJ 2002 L 247, p. 27).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2002/753/EC of 19 June 2002 on measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany for Deutsche Post AG; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2002/753/EC of 19 June 2002 on measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany for Deutsche Post AG;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Deutsche Post; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Deutsche Post;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Bundesverband Internationaler Express- und Kurierdienste eV (BIEK) and UPS Europe NV/SA to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Bundesverband Internationaler Express- und Kurierdienste eV (BIEK) and UPS Europe NV/SA to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 9.11.2002.

1

---
§ 1801.21 Processing requests for access to or amendment of records. ( a ) *In general.* Requests meeting the requirements of § 1801.11 through § 1801.13 shall be processed under both the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and the applicable regulations, unless the requester demands otherwise in writing. Such requests will be processed under both Acts regardless of whether the requester cites one Act in the request, both, or neither. This action is taken in order to ensure the maximum possible disclosure to the requester.
( b ) *Receipt, recording and tasking.* Upon receipt of a request meeting the requirements of §§ 1801.11 through 1801.13, NACIC shall within ten (10) days record each request, acknowledge receipt to the requester, and thereafter effect the necessary taskings to the office(s) reasonably believed to hold responsive records.
( c ) *Effect of certain exemptions.* In processing a request, NACIC shall decline to confirm or deny the existence or nonexistence of any responsive records whenever the fact of their existence or nonexistence is itself classified under Executive Order 12958 and that confirmation of the existence of a record may jeopardize intelligence sources and methods protected pursuant to section 103(c)(6) of the National Security Act of 1947. In such circumstances, NACIC, in the form of a final written response, shall so inform the requester and advise of his or her right to an administrative appeal.
( d ) *Time for response.* Although the Privacy Act does not mandate a time for response, our joint treatment of requests under both the Privacy Act and the FOIA means that the NACIC should provide a response within the FOIA statutory guideline of ten (10) days on initial requests and twenty (20) days on administrative appeals. However, the volume of requests may require that NACIC seek additional time from a requester pursuant to § 1801.33. In such event, NACIC will inform the requester in writing and further advise of his or her right to file an administrative appeal.
Requested NMP Data 

Rick Wilburn to: tzick, Lambesis.Christopher, Ramaly.Todd 09/22/2010 12:46 PM 

Cc: "Gary Wood" 

"Rick Wilburn" <wilburnr@trimatrixlabs.com > 

<tzick@cticompanies.com>, <Lambesis.Christopher@epamail.epa.gov>, 

<Ramaly.Todd@epamail.epa.gov> 

"Gary Wood" <woodgl@trimatrixlabs.com> 

Please respond to <wilbumr@trimatrixlabs .com> 

Attached please find the requested NMP data. 

Rick 

Rick D. Wilburn 

Quality Assurance Manager 

Corporate / Laboratory Main:616-975-4500 

5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE Direct:616-940-4246 

Grand Rapids, Michigan 49512 Fax:616-942-7463 

wilburnr@trim atrixlabs.com 
NMP Calculations 

Example calculation for sample 1003151-01 

Assuming pure product concentration is 1,000,000 ppm 

1,000,000 ng /uLx 50 uL = 1,000,000 ng/mLug/L=1,000mg/L=ug/mL=ng/uL 

50 mL 

1„000ng/uLx100uL = 1,0,000ng/mLug/L=10mg/L 

10mL 

Overall, the pure product was diluted 100,000 times: 50 uL into 50 mL (1000x dilution), then 100 uL of that into 10 

mL (100x dilution). 

Sample #1003151-01 

17913109 

 x 

5 ug /mL =37 .4 x100 ,000 =3,740 ,000 mg /L 

2394878 1 

Example for samples 

Sample Peak Area Internal S tan dard Concentration 

 x 

 Final Extract Volume 

Internal Stan dard Peak Area 

x 

Response Factor Initial Sample Volume 

= ug / g = (mg / kg) 

Sample #1003151-03 

1305710 x5 ug /mL = 4.23 ug /mL x10 mL _1.42u ug / g = mg /kg 

1542096 1 29 .8 g 

Sample #1003151-05 

757007 x 5ug/mL= 1.43ug/mLx10mL = 0.48 ug/g=mg/kg 

2641963 1 29.9g 
File :C:\Documents and Settings\analystsv\Desktop\031710\1003151-0 

1.D 

Operator : JLB 

Instrument : 308 

Acquired : 17 Mar 2010 15:25 using AcqMethod 030810BNA.M 

Sample Name: 1003151-01 

Misc Info : 
File :C:\Documents and Settings\analystsv\Desktop\031710\1003151-0 

1.D 

Operator : JLB 

Instrument : 308 

Acquired : 17 Mar 2010 15:25 using AcqMethod 030810BNA.M 

Sample Name: 1003151-01 

Misc Info : 
TIC: 1003151-01.D\data.ms 

1003151-01 

Peak # Ret Time Type Width Area Start Time End Time 

1 7.901 rm 0.204 2394878 7.855 8.059 

2 8.257 rm 0.239 17913109 8.181 8.420 
File :C:\Documents and Settings\analystsv\Desktop\031710\1003151-0 

3.D 

Operator : JLB 

Instrument : 308 

Acquired : 17 Mar 2010 16:00 using AcqMethod 030810BNA.M 

Sample Name: 1003151-03 

Misc Info : 
TIC: 1003151-03.D\data.ms 

1003151-03 

Peak # Ret Time Type width Area Start Time End Time 

1 8.263 rm 0.047 1305710 8.233 8.280 
File :C:\Documents and Settings\analystsv\Desktop\031710\1003151-0 

5.D 

Operator : JLB 

Instrument : 308 

Acquired : 17 Mar 2010 17:10 using AcqMethod 030810BNA.M 

Sample Name: 1003151-05 

Misc Info 
TIC: 1003151-05.D\data.ms 

1003151-05 

Peak # Ret Time Type Width Area Start Time End Time 

1 8.286 rm 0.035 757007 8.280 8.315
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jacques Tizabi, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
Universal Detection Technology (the "registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 16, 2009

By: /s/ Jacques Tizabi
    ------------------
Jacques Tizabi,
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
### §515. Reports to Congress

The Administrator shall submit semi-annual written reports to the Congress covering the selection of institutions and contracts entered into pursuant to section 512 of this title together with other pertinent information relative to the Administrator's activities and accomplishments thereunder.

(Oct. 27, 1949, ch. 766, title I, §105, 63 Stat. 937; Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §301(d)(2), July 29, 1958, 72 Stat. 433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1958—Pub. L. 85–568 substituted "Administrator" for "Committee" and "Administrator's" for "Committee's".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–568 effective 90 days after July 29, 1958, or on any earlier date on which the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration determines, and announces by proclamation, that the Administration has been organized and is prepared to discharge the duties and exercise the powers conferred upon it, see section 301(e) of Pub. L. 85–568, set out as a note under section 511 of this title.
### §1222. Availability of other remedies

Except as provided in section 1221(i), nothing in this chapter or chapter 23 shall be construed to limit any right or remedy available under a provision of statute which is outside of both this chapter and chapter 23.

(Added Pub. L. 101–12, §3(a)(13), Apr. 10, 1989, 103 Stat. 31.)
§ 150.2 Jurisdiction. ( a ) The jurisdiction of the Court is as follows: ( 1 ) *Review under Article 66.* All cases of trial by court-martial in which the sentence as approved extends to: ( i ) Death; or
( ii ) Dismissal of a commissioned officer, cadet or midshipman, dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for 1 year or longer; and in which the accused has not waived or withdrawn appellate review.
( 2 ) *Review upon direction of the Judge Advocate General under Article 69.* All cases of trial by court-martial in which there has been a finding of guilty and a sentence: ( i ) For which Article 66 does not otherwise provide appellate review, and
( ii ) Which the Judge Advocate General forwards to the Court for review pursuant to Article 69(d), and
( iii ) In which the accused has not waived or withdrawn appellate review.
( 3 ) *Review under Article 62.* All cases of trial by court-martial in which a punitive discharge may be adjudged and a military judge presides, and in which the government appeals an order or ruling of the military judge that terminates the proceedings with respect to a charge or specification or excludes evidence that is substantial proof of a fact material to the proceedings, or directs the disclosure of classified information, imposes sanctions for nondisclosure of classified information, or refuses to issue or enforce a protective order sought by the United States to prevent the disclosure of classified information.
( 4 ) *Review under Article 73.* All petitions for a new trial in cases of trial by court-martial which are referred to the Court by the Judge Advocate General.
( b ) *Extraordinary writs.* The Court may, in its discretion, entertain petitions for extraordinary relief including, but not limited to, writs of mandamus, writs of prohibition, writs of habeas corpus, and writs of error coram nobis.
( c ) *Effect of rules on jurisdiction.* Nothing in this part shall be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the Courts of Criminal Appeals as established by law.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9877 

To impose limitations on the amount of unobligated balances of the Bureau 

of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2024 

Mr. MOONEY (for himself, Mr. BARR, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. OGLES, Mr. 

MEUSER, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, and Mr. LOPEZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To impose limitations on the amount of unobligated balances 

of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CFPB Budget Integ5 rity Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9877 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON UNOBLIGATED BALANCES OF THE 

2 BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTEC3 TION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1017(a)(2) of the Con5 sumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 

6 5497(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

7 new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(D) LIMITATION ON UNOBLIGATED BAL9 ANCES.—For a fiscal year, the amount of unob10 ligated balances of the Bureau may not exceed 

11 5 percent of the dollar amount referred to in 

12 subparagraph (A)(iii). The Director shall trans13 fer any excess amount of such unobligated bal14 ances to the general fund of the Treasury.’’. 

15 (b) REPORT ON USE OF UNOBLIGATED BALANCES.— 

16 Section 1017(e)(4) of such Act (12 U.S.C. 5497(e)(4)) is 

17 amended by inserting ‘‘(including a description of the use 

18 of any unobligated balances)’’ after ‘‘funds of the Bu19 reau’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT      32 **

**Certifications      **

**Pursuant      to Section 906 **

**Of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **

**(18      U.S.C. Section 1350) **

|                                                                                                            |                                                          |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                September 27, 2007             | /S/                *Reginald                M. Fountain, Jr.* |
|                                                                                                            | Reginald                M. Fountain, Jr.                      |
|                                                                                                            | President                and Chief Executive Officer          |
|                                                                                                            |                                                          |
| Date:                September 27, 2007                                                                         | /S/                *Irving                L. Smith*           |
|                                                                                                            | Irving                L. Smith                                |
|                                                                                                            | Chief                Financial Officer                        |

----
### SUBCHAPTER VII–A—EDUCATION IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-13T19:58:16-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9984 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit qualified business 

trade expenses to be treated as qualified higher education expenses for 

purposes of 529 accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2024 

Ms. PEREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

qualified business trade expenses to be treated as qualified higher education expenses for purposes of 529 accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. QUALIFIED BUSINESS TRADE EXPENSES 

4 TREATED AS QUALIFIED HIGHER EDUCATION 

5 EXPENSES FOR PURPOSES OF 529 ACCOUNTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529(e)(3) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new subparagraph: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9984 IH

1 ‘‘(C) QUALIFIED BUSINESS TRADE EX2 PENSES.—The term ‘qualified higher education 

3 expenses’ includes qualified business trade ex4 penses (as defined in subsection (f)).’’. 

5 (b) QUALIFIED BUSINESS TRADE EXPENSES.—Sec6 tion 529 is amended by redesignating subsection (f) as 

7 subsection (g) and by inserting after subsection (e) the 

8 following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(f) QUALIFIED BUSINESS TRADE EXPENSES.—For 

10 purposes of this section— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘qualified post 

12 business trade expenses’ means amounts paid by the 

13 designated beneficiary for specified business prop14 erty used by the designated beneficiary in a qualified 

15 trade field. 

16 ‘‘(2) SPECIFIED BUSINESS PROPERTY.—The 

17 term ‘specified business property’ means tangible 

18 property (other than buildings) which is of a char19 acter subject to the allowance for depreciation. 

20 ‘‘(3) QUALIFIED TRADE FIELD.—The term 

21 ‘qualified trade field’ means any field which is de22 scribed by one of the following National industry 

23 codes of the North American Industry Classification 

24 System: 113110, 1113210, 113310, 114111, 

25 114112, 114119, 114210, 115310, 236115, 236116, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9984 IH

1 236117, 236118, 236210, 236220, 237110, 237120, 

2 237130, 237210, 237310, 237990, 238110, 238120, 

3 238130, 238140, 238150, 238160, 238170, 238190, 

4 238210, 238220, 238290, 238310, 238320, 238330, 

5 238340, 238350, 238390, 238910, 238990, 811111, 

6 811114, 811198, 811210, 811310, 811411, 811412, 

7 811420, 811430, or 811490.’’. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to expenses paid in taxable years 

10 beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 1602.11 District appeal board.

A district appeal board or a panel thereof of the Selective Service System is a group of not less than three civilian members appointed by the President to act on cases of registrants in accordance with the provisions of parts 1651 and 1656 of this chapter.

[69 FR 20543, Apr. 16, 2004]
### §214. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section, R.S. §5310, provided that property taken on inland waters of the United States was not a maritime prize. See section 7651 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Proposed Rule: Final Confidentiality Determinations for Nine Subparts and Amendments to Subpart A and I under 

the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule

Meeting Documentation: Phone communication with American Petroleum Institute, April 26, 2012

Date EPA Staff Contact 

Information (Name, email, 

phone #)

Name of Organization 

(Attach list of all 

attendees names and 

emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, 

reporting requirements, etc.)

Written Comments 

Provided?

Did they also 

submit to Docket?

Date sent to EPACCD

4/26/12 Lisa Hanle

Lisa Bacanskas, 

bacanskas.lisa@epa.gov, 

202-343-9758

API:

Karin Ritter,

ritterk@api.org

Follow up call on API's comment that 

some data elements, if made publicly 

available, would reveal information 

concerning exploratory wells.

Comments 

previously 

provided and 

submitted to 

Docket

4/6/12