FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT June 29, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 12163 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 9 6 - 0 0 0 7 6 - C R - F T M- 2 9 - DN F U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s R O D E R I C K N A N C E , a .k .a . R aR a , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju n e 29, 2006) B efo re C A RN E S , B A R K E T T an dP R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: R od er i ck N ance appeal s hi s s ent ence fol l ow i ng re vo ca t i on of supervi se d rel ease, rai si n g tw o i ssu es. F i rst , N an ce arg u es th ath i s t erm o f su p erv i sedrel ease2

t o f ol l ow hi s c urr e nti nc a r c e r a t i on i s i l l e ga l . S e c ond, N a nc e c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notc ons i de rthe r e qui r e d f a c t or s i n i m pos i ng the r e voc a t i on se nt ence . S ent enci ng i ss ues, such as thi s one, ra i se d for the fi rs tt i m e on app ea l ar e r e v ie w e do n lyf

o rp la in e rr o r . U n ite dS ta te s v . C h is h o lm , 7 3 F .3 d3 0 4 , 3 0 7 ( 1 1 th C ir . 1 9 9 6 ) . T h is r e q u ir e s th a t th e e rr o rb e p la in a n dth a t it a f f e c t s u b s ta n tia l r ig h ts and ser i ou sl y i m pl i ca t e the fa i rnes s, i nt egri ty, or pu bl i c r eput at i on of j ud i ci al p r o c e e d in g s . U n ite dS ta te s v . H a n s e n , 2 6 2 F .3 d1 2 1 7 , 1 2 4 8 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) . W here the expl i ci tl angu age of a s t atut e does notspec i fi ca l l y r es ol ve an i ss ue, there c a n b e n o p la in e rr o rab s e n t p r e c e d e n t f r o m th e S up r e m e C o u rt o ru s d ir e c tly re sol vi ng i t . U ni t ed S t at es v. L ej ar de-R ada, 31 9 F . 3d 12 88 , 12 91 (11th C i r. 20 03 ). B e c aus e the m a xi m um t e rm of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e appl i c abl e t o N a nc e ’ s s t a tut e of c onvi c t i on i s l i f

e , hi s 33- m onth t e rm of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e f

ol l ow i ng hi s c urr e nt t e rm o f i n c a r c e r a t i o n d o e s n o te x c e e dth e s t a tu t o ryma x i mu m. N a nc e a l s o a r gue s tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourti m pr ope r l yi m pos e d the r e voc a t i on s e nt e nc e w i thoutc ons i de r i ng the r e qui r e d f a c t or s a s s e tf

orth i n the S e nt e nc i ng G ui del i nes and 18 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(a) . In i m po si ng a r evocat i on se nt ence , a di stri ct c ourti s i ns truc t e d t o c ons i de rs e ve r a l f a c t or s : ( 1) the na tur e a nd c i r c um s t a nc e s of the of f e ns e a nd the hi s t orya nd c ha r a c t e r i s t i c s of the de f e nda nt ; ( 2) the ne e d f

orthe3

s e nt e nc e t o ( a ) a f

f or d a de qua t e de t e rr e nc e t o c r i m i na l c onduc t ; ( b) pr ot e c tthe p u b lic f r o m f u rth e rc r im e s o f

th e d e f e n d a n t; a n d( c ) p r o v id e th e d e f e n d a n t w ith needed educat i on alor vo ca t i on altra i ni ng , m edi ca l care , or other c orre ct i on al tr e a tm e nti n the m os te f f e c t i ve m a nne r ; ( 3) the ki nds of s e nt e nc e s a nd the s e nt e nc i ng r a nge e s t abl i s he d f orthe of f e ns e ; ( 4) the pol i c ys t a t e m e nt s of the S e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s ; ( 5) the ne e d t o a voi d unw a rr a nt e d s e nt e nc e di s pa r i t i e s ; a nd (6) the need t o p rovi de re st i tut i on for any vi ct i m s. 18 U . S . C . §§ 35 83 (e ); 3553( a ) ( 1) , ( a ) ( 2) ( B ) , ( C ) a nd ( D ) , ( a ) ( 4) , ( a ) ( 5) , ( a ) ( 6) , a nd ( a ) ( 7) . T he S e nt e nc i ng G u i d el i n es h ere reco m m en d eda rev o cat i o n sen t en ce o f 4 t o 1 0 m o n th s’ i ncar ce ra t i on . U . S . S . G . § 7 B 1. 4(a) . T h e r e c o r ds h o w s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt w a s a w a r e o f th e ap p lic ab le gu i del i ne rang e. T he courthere t oo k i nt o con si dera t i on the rang e of s ent ence s a va i l abl e , N a nc e ’ s hi s t ory , hi s l a c k of s uc c e s s i n e ndi ng hi s drug habi tw hi l e on re l ea se , and h i s nee d for m ore r es tri ct i ve re habi l i t at i on . In short , the di stri ctcourt di d notc om m i te rr or , pl a i n, i nvi t e d, orothe rw i s e , i n i m pos i ng N a nc e ’ s r e voc a t i on se nt ence . AF F I RME D.