alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NO. 12

- 20

- 00221

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BRADLEY DION FERREL L

, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 173RD

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORAN DUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant , Bradley Dion Ferrell, filed a motion to d ismiss this appeal. The motion is

sig ned by Appellant and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal.

Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and t he appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered N ovember 30, 2020.

P anel consisted of Wor then, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMEN T

NOVEMBER 30 , 2020

NO. 12

- 20

- 00221

- CR

BRADLEY DION FERRELL

, Appellant

V.

THE STAT E OF TEXAS

, Appellee

Appeal from the 173rd District Court

of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CR18

- 0780

- 173 )

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the App ellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered , it is hereby ORDERED , ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observ ance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoy le, J. and Neeley, J.
Exhibit   21.01
 
 
 Subsidiaries
of the Registrant
 
 
 CommunityOne
Bank, National Association -
 National
banking association headquartered in the State of North Carolina
 
 First
National Investor Services, Inc. -
 A North
Carolina corporation and operating subsidiary
 
 Premier
Investment Services, Inc. –
 A North
Carolina corporation and operating subsidiary
 
 Dover
Mortgage Company –
 A North
Carolina corporation and operating subsidiary
 
 FNB
United Statutory Trust I –
 A
Connecticut statutory business trust
 
 FNB
United Statutory Trust II –
 A
Delaware statutory business trust
 
 Catawba
Valley Capital Trust II –
 A
Delaware statutory business trust
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         179,338
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  727,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,571
<INVENTORY>                                  1,149,945
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,176,567
<PP&E>                                       4,807,814
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,895,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,858,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,485,218
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,858,557
<SALES>                                      3,824,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,824,623
<CGS>                                        3,095,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  405,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105,438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                218,638
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (87,455)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            131,183
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   131,183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
#### FLAGG, Respondent, v. FISK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Cornelia C. Flagg against Almira G. Fisk and others.

H. B. Kinghorn, for appellants. M. K. Flagg, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### § 1624.2 Issuance of induction orders.

The Director of Selective Service, upon receipt of a call from the Secretary of Defense for persons to be inducted into the Armed Forces in accord with § 1624.4, shall issue orders to report for induction to registrants whose registration records are in the master computer file at the beginning of any day on which orders are issued. Orders shall be issued in such numbers and at such times as will assure that such call or requisition is filled. The names contained in the Selective Service System data base on a given day will constitute the valid list of registrants from which induction orders can be issued on that day.
Exhibit 32.2



Section 1350 Certification of the

Chief Financial Officer



I, Michael Smith, the chief financial officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics
Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.



/s/ Michael SmithMichael SmithPrincipal Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, H. R. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 16, 2006



/s/    H. R. BrownH. R. BrownPresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2023182EN.01000101.xml

| 24.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11070 – CHEMOURS / BWT FUMATECH MOBILITY / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 182/01)

On 8 May 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11070. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11070. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### § 924.17 State regulatory program provisions and amendments not approved.

The proposed language in section 53-9-55(3), as submitted by Mississippi on May 6, 1997, that allows the commission to promulgate regulations regarding a waiver from the requirement to post a penalty payment bond upon a showing by the operator of an inability to post the bond is disapproved.

[63 FR 1362, Jan. 9, 1998]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9732 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9732

To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify that private, one-on-
one communications constitute a notice or advertisement for purposes of 
the Federal crime of making a notice or advertisement to seek or offer 
                           child pornography.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2024

Ms. Lee of Florida (for herself and Mr. Ivey) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify that private, one-on-
one communications constitute a notice or advertisement for purposes of 
the Federal crime of making a notice or advertisement to seek or offer 
                           child pornography.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection of Child Victims from 
Online Predators Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE.

    Section 2251(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) For purposes of this subsection, a notice or advertisement 
can occur in a private, one-on-one communication.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 922.777 General content requirements for permit applications.

Part 777 of this chapter, *General Content Requirements for Permit Applications,* shall apply to any person who applies for a permit to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.

[52 FR 13811, Apr. 24, 1987]
#### Nora O’Connell, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph K. O’Connell, Deceased, Respondent, v. Enterprise Paper Corp., et al., Appellants. New Amsterdam Motor Transportation Corp., Third-Party .Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Motion by defendants-appellants and third-party plaintiff-appellant for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Wyoming Greater Sage-Grouse 

DRAFT 

Land Use Plan Amendment 

and 

DRAFT 

Environmental Impact Statement 

for the 

Casper, Kemmerer, Newcastle, Pinedale, 

Rawlins, and Rock Springs Field Offices 

and 

Bridger-Teton and Medicine Bow National 

Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland 

for 

Public Lands Administered by the 

Bureau of Land Management 

Wyoming State Office 

and 

National Forest System Lands Administered by the 

Medicine Bow and Bridger-Teton National Forests 

and 

Thunder Basin National Grassland

December 2013
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 2 April 2008 – Maison de l’Europe Avignon Méditerranée v Commission**

**(Case T-100/03)**

Action for annulment – Setting up of an Info-Point Europe – Termination of an agreement entered into by the Commission and the applicant – Manifest inadmissibility

Actions for annulment – Action relating in reality to a contractual dispute (Arts 225 EC, 230 EC, 238 EC and 249 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court
of First Instance, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 21-24)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of the decision of the Commission of 24 January 2003 terminating the agreement between the Commission and the applicant on the setting up of an Info-Point Europe (IPE) in Avignon. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Maison de l’Europe Avignon Méditerranée to pay the costs. |
### §302704. Contracts and cooperative agreements

At the request of an Indian tribe whose preservation program has been approved to assume functions and responsibilities pursuant to section 302702 of this title, the Secretary shall enter into a contract or cooperative agreement with the Indian tribe permitting the assumption by the Indian tribe of any part of the responsibilities described in section 302304(b) of this title on tribal land, if—

(1) the Secretary and the Indian tribe agree on additional financial assistance, if any, to the Indian tribe for the costs of carrying out those authorities;

(2) the Secretary finds that the tribal historic preservation program has been demonstrated to be sufficient to carry out the contract or cooperative agreement and this division; and

(3) the contract or cooperative agreement specifies the continuing responsibilities of the Secretary or of the appropriate State Historic Preservation Officers and provides for appropriate participation by—

(A) the Indian tribe's traditional cultural authorities;

(B) representatives of other Indian tribes whose traditional land is under the jurisdiction of the Indian tribe assuming responsibilities; and

(C) the interested public.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3200.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302704 | 16 U.S.C. 470a(d)(4). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §101(d)(4), as added Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4006(a)(2), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4757. |

Section
Exhibit 21.1
                               Lancer Corporation
                              List of Subsidiaries

United States:

Lancer Capital Corporation
San Antonio, Texas

Lancer International Sales, Inc.
San Antonio, Texas

Lancer Investment Corporation
Wilmington, Delaware

Lan-Leasing, Inc.
San Antonio, Texas

Lancer Partnership, Ltd.
San Antonio, Texas

Mexico:

Industrias Lancermex, S.A. de C.V.
Piedras Negras, Coahuila, Mexico

Lancer de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico

Servicios Lancermex, S.A. de C.V.
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico

Brazil:

Lancer do Brasil, Participacoes, Empreendimentos e Representacoes, Ltda.
Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Europe:

Lancer Europe, S.A.
Brussels, Belgium

Lancer Limited
Ruislip, Middlesex, United Kingdom

OOO Lancer Sales Company
Moscow, Russia

Australia:

Lancer Pacific, Pty. Ltd.
Lancer Pacific Industies, Pty. Ltd.
Beverly, South Australia, Australia

Lancer Pacific, Ltd.
Auckland, New Zealand
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 October 2007 – Feralpi Siderurgica v Commission**

**(Case T-77/03)**

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Producers of reinforcing bars – Decision establishing an infringement of Article 65 CS – Decision based on the ECSC Treaty after expiry of that treaty – Lack of competence of the Commission

1.                     *ECSC – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Commission decision establishing an infringement of Article 65 CS after
the expiry of that treaty (Art. 65(1), (4) and (5) CS; Council Regulation No 17, Arts 3 and 15(2)) (see paras 55, 57, 72-73,
77)*

2.                     *ECSC – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Commission’s competence under Article 65(4) and (5) CS to establish
and penalise an infringement of Article 65(1) CS – Disappearance on expiry of the ECSC Treaty (Arts 65(1), (4) and (5) CS
and 97 CS; Art. 305(1) EC; Merger Treaty) (see paras 89-92, 94, 96)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2002) 5087 final of 17 December 2002, relating to a proceeding under Article 65 CS (Case COMP/37.956 – Reinforcing bars). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls Commission Decision C(2002) 5087 final of 17 December 2002 relating to a proceeding under Article 65 CS (Case COMP/37.956 – Reinforcing bars) with regard to Feralpi Siderurgica SpA; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Feralpi Siderurgica; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs. |
#### Carrie A. Maginnis, appellant, v. Eugene Maginnis, appellee.

Gen. No. 29,573.

Divorce. Order modifying alimony provisions in decree. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas J. Lynch, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 9, 1925.

Millard R. Powers, for appellant.

George A. McCorkle and Edward G. Purkhiser, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### First Federal Savings *&*Loan Association of New York, Respondent, v. United States of America, Appellant, and Harry Lewis et al., Respondents.

Motion by appellant to extend time to perfect appeal, granted; time extended to the February Term, beginning January 30, 1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before January 9, 1961. Stay granted by order of December 14, 1960, continued. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                             -----------------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                             -----------------------

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): July 24, 2003

                            MS Structured Asset Corp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

  Delaware                      333-64879                  13-4026700
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction  (Commission File     (IRS Employer
      of Incorporation)            Number)            Identification No.)

 1585 Broadway, New York, New York                                  10036
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                         (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

                                    Not Applicable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)




<PAGE>


Item 7.  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits

Exhibit 4.1       Trust Agreement

Exhibit 5.1       Validity Opinion of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton

Exhibit 23.1      Consent of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton
                  (included in Exhibit 5.1)


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereto duly authorized.

Date: July 25, 2003

                                      MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.
                                      (Registrant)


                                      By: /s/ John Kehoe
                                         -----------------------------------
                                      Name:  John Kehoe
                                      Title: Vice President


<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit 4.1       Trust Agreement

Exhibit 5.1       Validity Opinion of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton

Exhibit 23.1      Consent of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton
                  (included in Exhibit 5.1)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Jack C. BridgesJack C. BridgesExecutive Vice-PresidentNovember 14, 2008Date
#### § 810.3 Authority.

The Secretary shall approve and promulgate minimum coal exploration and surface mining and reclamation operations performance standards and design requirements applicable under regulatory programs which are at least as stringent as subchapter K in accordance with subchapter C of this chapter.