alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1.2

                         Amendment Dated 8-29-01 to the
                            Microchip Technology Inc.
                          Supplemental Retirement Plan

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                        MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
                                SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN

     WHEREAS, Microchip Technology Incorporated (the "Employer") adopted the
Microchip Technology Incorporated Supplemental Retirement Plan (the "Plan")
through adoption of the Fidelity Investments CORPORATEplan FOR RETIREMENT(sm)
Select Plan Basic Plan Document and Amendments ("the Basic Plan Document"),
effective as of January 1, 1997, for which Fidelity Management Trust Company
(the "Trustee") serves as trustee of the trust established to hold Plan assets
(the "Trust"); and

     WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan to remove the choice of
investment options from the Adoption Agreement:

     NOW THEREFORE, the Employer amends the Plan as follows effective October 4,
2001:

     1.   Section 1.11(b) is amended to replace all language between the first
          sentence and the total "Note" with the following sentence:

               Participant Accounts under the Trust will be invested among the
               Permissible Investments designated in the Service Agreement.

     2.   Section 2.01(a)(20) is amended to read as follows:

               "Registered Investment Company" means any one or more
               corporations, partnerships or trusts registered under the
               Investment Company Act of 1940.

     3.   Section 2.01(a)(28) is added to the Basic Plan Document as follows:

               "Permissible Investment" means the investments specified by the
               Employer as available for investment of assets of the Trust and
               agreed to by the Trustee.

     4.   Section 2.01(a)(29) is added to the Basic Plan Document as follows:

               "Service Agreement" means the agreement between the Employer and
               the Trustee relating to the provision of investment and other
               services to the Plan and shall include any addendum to the
               agreement and any other separate written agreement between the
               Employer and the Trustee relating to the provision of services to
               the Plan.

     5.   All occurrences of "Section 1.11(b)" in the Basic Plan Document No. 07
          will be replaced with "the Service Agreement".

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has signed this instrument this 29th day of
August, 2001.

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED

By: /s/ Linda Croft
    -------------------------

Title: Sr. HR Specialist
       ----------------------
~G USGS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

science fora changing world U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1411-A

Thickness and lithology of the Darwin-Humbug zone—PLATE 12

Geldon, AL., 2002, Geology ‘of Paleozoic rocks in the Upper Colorado River Basin in
fexico, Utah, and Wyoming, excluding the San Juan Basin

Arizona, Colorado, New

110°,

UPPER PART
OF MISSION
CANYON LIMESTONE
AND DARWIN
SANDSTONE
MEMBER OF
AMSDEN
FORMATION

4 42° BULL RIDGE MEMBER
OF MADISON LIMESTONE
AND DARWIN SANDSTONE
MEMBER OF AMSDEN
107° FORMATION

Wiss

Lies 4
ne

se Gpiinisot 7 ~

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO

G Ga RIVER BASIN

Springs

= 37°
Navajo 7

Reservoir =,

AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY

oo

1:2,000,000
25 50 75 100 MILES
; ; ; ! J
50 75 100 KILOMETERS

STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE AND THICKNESS

1:2,000,000

o-oo

25 50 75 100 MILES
L L 1 J
T T T T
25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS
LITHOLOGY

AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY

Navajo

Reservoir wa

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO
RIVER BASIN

ayia
“Hor SubpbudSprings , >

EXPLANATION

—*] Area where Darwin-Humbug zone is missing because of erosion

or nondeposition or thrust under Precambrian rocks
e Borehole with lithologic log used to prepare map

+ Measured surface stratigraphic section used to prepare map

Stratigraphic Nomenclature and Thickness

ae] Area where Darwin-Humbug zone crops out (generalized)

—zoo— Line of equal thickness—Interval is 100 feet

Approximate boundary between component geologic units

Lithology

Sandstone and shale with less than 25 percent limestone and dolomite

interbeds

Sandstone, shale, limestone, and dolomite; carbonate rocks commonly
are brecciated. Anhydrite or gypsum present locally

—25— Line of equal percent sandstone—Location generally is approximate because

of sparse control. Interval is 25 percent

Approximate boundary between lithofacies

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. base map, 1:2,500,000

By
Arthur L. Geldon

rovavat? }

STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE, THICKNESS, AND LITHOLOGY OF THE DARWIN-HUMBUG ZONE OF THE MADISON AQUIFER IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN AND VICINITY
IN ARIZONA, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, UTAH, AND WYOMING
### §20103. Selection of registration facilities

(a) Each State or political subdivision responsible for registration for Federal elections shall provide a reasonable number of accessible permanent registration facilities.

(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to any State that has in effect a system that provides an opportunity for each potential voter to register by mail or at the residence of such voter.

(Pub. L. 98–435, §4, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1679.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1973ee–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to elections taking place after Dec. 31, 1985, see section 9 of Pub. L. 98–435, set out as a note under section 20101 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 85673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28650]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Discount Rates for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Federal 
Programs

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget

ACTION: Revisions to Appendix C of OMB Circular A-94

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) revised Circular A-
94 in 1992. With this action, OMB has revised the Circular and 
specified certain discount rates to be updated annually when the 
interest rate and inflation assumptions used to prepare the Budget of 
the United States Government were changed. These updated discount rates 
are found in Appendix C of the revised Circular and are to be used for 
cost-effectiveness analysis, including lease-purchase analysis, as 
specified in the revised Circular. These rates do not apply to 
regulatory analysis.
    The revised Circular can be accessed at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Appendix-C.pdf.

DATES: The revised discount rates will be in effect through December 
2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Hern[aacute]ndez, Office of 
Economic Policy, Office of Management and Budget, (202) 395-3585.

Gideon Lukens,
Deputy Associate Director for Economic Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-28650 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
### §5101. Purpose

It is the purpose of this chapter to provide a plan for classification of positions whereby—

(1) in determining the rate of basic pay which an employee will receive—

(A) the principle of equal pay for substantially equal work will be followed; and

(B) variations in rates of basic pay paid to different employees will be in proportion to substantial differences in the difficulty, responsibility, and qualification requirements of the work performed and to the contributions of employees to efficiency and economy in the service; and

(2) individual positions will, in accordance with their duties, responsibilities, and qualification requirements, be so grouped and identified by classes and grades, as defined by section 5102 of this title, and the various classes will be so described in published standards, as provided by section 5105 of this title, that the resulting position-classification system can be used in all phases of personnel administration.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 443.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 1071. | Oct. 28, 1949, ch. 782, §101, 63 Stat. 954. |

Statutes at Large

The words "and for rates of basic compensation" are omitted as inapplicable to this chapter since the provisions of former chapter 21 relating to rates of basic compensation are carried into subchapter III of chapter 53. The word "officer" is omitted as included in "employee" is defined in section 5102.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface of the report.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Occupational Series for Digital Career Fields

Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XI, §1118, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1956, provided that: "Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 27, 2021], the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall, pursuant to chapter 51 of title 5, United States Code, establish or update one or more occupational series covering Federal Government positions in the fields of software development, software engineering, data science, and data management."

#### References in Other Laws to Chapter 51 and Subchapter III of Chapter 53

References in laws to fix pay in accordance with this chapter and subchapter III of chapter 53 of this title considered to include authority under section 5376 of this title, if applicable, but not to include any authority under section 5304 of this title or section 529 [title III, §302] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out as a note under section 5304 of this title, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(2)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates; Regulations note under section 5376 of this title.
§ 948.10 State regulatory program approval. The West Virginia program, as submitted on March 3, 1980, as clarified on July 16, 1980, and as resubmitted on December 19, 1980, is conditionally approved, effective January 21, 1981. Beginning on that date and continuing until July 11, 1985, the Department of Natural Resources was deemed the regulatory authority in West Virginia for all surface coal mining and reclamation operations and all exploration operations on non-Federal and non-Indian lands. Beginning on July 11, 1985, the Department of Energy was deemed the regulatory authority pursuant to the program transfer provisions of Enrolled Committee Substitute for House Bill 1850, as signed by the Governor of West Virginia on May 3, 1985. Beginning on October 16, 1991, the Division of Environmental Protection was deemed the regulatory authority pursuant to Enrolled Committee Substitute for House Bill 217 that was signed by the Governor on October 25, 1991. On December 3, 1991, OSM found that it was not necessary to amend the State program to effect the redesignation of the regulatory authority from the Division of Energy to the Division of Environmental Protection (58 FR 42904, August 12, 1993). Beginning on April 14, 2001, the Department of Environmental Protection was deemed the regulatory authority pursuant to Enrolled Committee Substitute for House Bill 2218. The bill, which was signed by the Governor on April 30, 2001, transferred programs and redesignated the Division of Environmental Protection as the Department of Environmental Protection within the executive branch. Copies of the conditionally approved program, as amended, are available at: ( a ) Office of Surface Mining, Charleston Field Office, 1027 Virginia Street East, Charleston, West Virginia 25301-2816. Telephone: (304) 347-7158.
( b ) West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Mining and Reclamation, 10 McJunkin Road, Nitro, West Virginia 25143-2506. Telephone: (304) 759-0510.
[66 FR 67453, Dec. 28, 2001]
# C_2023230EN.01013601.xml

| 30.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/136 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/136

---

Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia

(2023/C 230/09)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia, the subject of which is the granting of state aid to air carriers for the start-up of operation of new air routes, for the carriage of passengers to or from a public airport in the territory of the Republic of Slovenia at which international air transport is performed, to a single landing point in the territory of the countries of the European Common Aviation Area (ECAA).

The text of the Tender (in the Slovene and English language) will be available on Government’s official website www.gov.si on the date of the publishment of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union together with the Tender documentation.

The applications for aid must be submitted within 30 days of the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Applicants may ask any questions regarding the Tender by sending an email to mzi.air-connect@gov.si with the subject: ‘Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia’.

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ruth B. Kupfer, Respondent, v. Mrs. A. Felix Du Pont et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appellants correctly define the sole issue as whether claimant was an employee or an independent contractor. Claimant, a registered nurse, whose name was upon the nurses’ registry in the hospital where the employer was a patient, was called to attend the employer. When the employer was discharged 12 days later she asked claimant to go home with her. Claimant did so and continued to care for her for some years. Claimant was first paid by the day but after a time was paid monthly at the rate of $600, working eight hours per day, with occasional unpaid overtime, with one day off each week and a paid *924annual vacation, the employer also furnishing room and hoard at her homes in New York, Maine and Florida. At the employer’s direction, claimant rendered services to the household employees, without additional compensation; and, indeed, at the employer’s request, was on her way to see an ailing maid in the latter’s room and to take her temperature when she fell and sustained the injury for which this award was made. Although it is true that claimant rendered professional services under the direction of the employer’s' physician, who, however, usually came to the house but once in 10 days and sometimes but once a month, she nevertheless rendered such nonprofessional services as shopping, making and receiving telephone calls and performing other household duties. Also inconsistent with appellants’ theory of an independent contractual arrangement are the facts that, when injured, claimant was furnished medical care and was paid, whether as advance payment of compensation or otherwise, her full salary during her eight months’ disability, following which she returned to her duties with the employer. Although, perhaps, of no compelling weight, a report of accident was filed by the employer, upon which she designated herself as such. The employer withheld no income tax or social security payments, but such an omission is not fatal to the claim. *(Matter of Waterbury*v. *Lieges Clwst,*284 App. Div. 912, mot. for iv. to opp. den. 307 N. Y. 944; *Matter of Webster*v. *Mason,*13 A D 2d 355, 357.) Neither is it conclusive that some, or perhaps most, of the services rendered were professional in nature; as was held in *Matter of Bernstein*v. *Beth Israel Hosp.*(236 N. Y. 268), which involved a hospital interne and in which (p. 270) a distinction was drawn “ between the position of a visiting or consulting physician, and that of an interne, who has placed his time and service at the call of a superior” and a like distinction noted “ between attorneys at law retained for a specific service, and those serving a single employer in consideration of a salary”. In many cases presenting conflicting inferences upon the issue of employment status it has been held that the board’s finding must prevail. *(Matter of Gordon*v. *New York Life Ins. Co.,*300 N. Y. 652, 654.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
# C_2008301EN.01003501.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/35

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2008 — Jacobs v Commission

(Case T-131/04) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Interlocutory judgment - No need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 301/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Luc Jacobs (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

First, application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 14 April 2003 altering the applicant's classification in grade, in so far as it fixes his classification in step on recruitment in step 2 of Grade B4, fixes 5 October 1995 as the date on which the decision was to have pecuniary effect and did not re-establish the applicant's career grade, and an application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant's complaint and, second, an application for compensation for the damage allegedly caused by that decision.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action.

| 2. | The Commission shall pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission shall pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 30.4.2004.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LIFECORE
BIOMEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000028626
<NAME> LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,409,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,046,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   393,000
<INVENTORY>                                 24,671,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,487,000
<PP&E>                                      42,159,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,791,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,798,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,044,000
<BONDS>                                      6,649,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,479,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,798,000
<SALES>                                     15,667,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,667,000
<CGS>                                        6,879,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,702,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             466,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                502,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            502,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   502,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ David J. Noble                               
| |  | David J. Noble                                   
| |  | Chairman/Director And Principal Executive
Officer
| | 
| |  | August 11, 2004                                  
| |  | Date
#### § 90.2 Definitions.

Until April 14, 2025, the following definitions apply in this part:
#### § 903.736 Permit fees.

Section 736.25 of this chapter, *Permit fees* applies to any person who makes application for a permit to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations in Arizona.
#### § 1633.12 Reconsideration of classification.

No classification is permanent. The Director of Selective Service may order the reconsideration of any classification action when the facts, upon which the classification is based, change or when he finds that the registrant made a misrepresentation of any material fact related to his claim for classification. No action may be taken under the preceding sentence of this paragraph unless the registrant is notified in writing of the impending action and the reasons thereof, and is given an opportunity to respond in writing within 10 days of the mailing of the notice. If the Director orders a reconsideration of a classification in accord with this paragraph, the claim will be treated in all respects as if it were the original claim for that classification.
#### SCHUTZ, Respondent, v. UNION RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by Friedrich Otto Schutz against the Union Railway Company of New York City.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

WOODWARD, J., dissents.
### §2771. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–239, div. C, title XXXI, §3131(u)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2184

Section, Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVII, §4731, formerly Pub. L. 95–509, title II, §208, Oct. 24, 1978, 92 Stat. 1779; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVII, §4731, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(j)(7), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1782, provided that the Secretary was to submit to the Congress for fiscal year 1980, and for each subsequent fiscal year, a single request for authorization of appropriations for common defense and security programs.