alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008209EN.01004301.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/43

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2008 — Compagnie maritime belge v Commission

(Case T-276/04) (1)

1

(Competition - Abuse of collective dominant position - Shipping conference - Decision imposing a fine on the basis of an earlier decision annulled in part by the Court of Justice - Regulation (EEC) No 2988/74 - Reasonable time-limit - Rights of the defence - Legal certainty - Force of res judicata)

res judicata

(2008/C 209/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Compagnie maritime belge SA (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by É. Gippini Fournier, P. Hellström and F. Amato, then by É. Gippini Fournier, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2005/480/EC of 30 April 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 82 EC (Cases COMP/D2/32.448 and 32.450) (summarised in OJ 2005 L 171, p. 28), imposing a fine on the applicant for alleged abuses of a collective dominant position engaged in by the Cewal conference and, in the alternative, the reduction of that fine.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Compagnie maritime belge SA to pay two-thirds of its own costs and two-thirds of the costs incurred by the Commission, and orders the Commission to pay one-third of its own costs and one-third of the costs incurred by Compagnie maritime belge. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Compagnie maritime belge SA to pay two-thirds of its own costs and two-thirds of the costs incurred by the Commission, and orders the Commission to pay one-third of its own costs and one-third of the costs incurred by Compagnie maritime belge.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---
#### § 933.795 Small operator assistance.

Part 795 of this chapter, *Small Operator Assistance,* shall apply to any person making application for assistance under the small operator assistance program.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Earl L. Jordan, Appellant, against Walter B. Martin, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Reargument of motion to prosecute appeal on original papers, typewritten briefs, from order entered September 10, 1957, granted on court’s own motion, and upon reargument, motion granted. Donald N. Fitzer, Esq., assigned as counsel to conduct appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1034 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1034

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 29, 2024.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Homeland Security: Mr. Suozzi (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Menendez).
    Committee on Oversight and Accountability: Ms. Pressley.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 99.3 -- Report of Management

HOMEQ SERVICING


      		MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, HomEq Servicing Corporation
(the "Company") complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same
period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions
policy in the amounts of $200 million and $20 million, respectively.


HomEq Servicing Corporation

/s/  Arthur Q. Lyon 			February 25, 2005
Arthur Q. Lyon				Date
President


/s/  Keith G. Becher 			February 25, 2005
Keith G. Becher				Date
Chief Operating Officer
#### § 937.761 Areas designated unsuitable for surface coal mining by Act of Congress.

Part 761 of this chapter, *Areas Designated by Act of Congress,* shall apply to surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
### **CHAPTER 309—AWARDS**

Sec.
30901.
Congressional Space Medal of Honor.
30902.
Charles "Pete" Conrad Astronomy Awards.
#### § 922.780 Surface mining permit applications—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan.

Part 780 of this chapter, *Surface Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-Federal and non-Indian lands.
AAM-13-364-E

June 06, 2013

 Exemption No. 10792

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0409

Mr. Byron DeVries

ApexHeli Oregon, Inc.

89060 Condon Creek Road

Florence, OR 97439

Dear Mr. DeVries:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 25, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of ApexHeli Oregon, Inc. (ApexHeli) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow ApexHeli to cover its safetysensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ApexHeli.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing 

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of 

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was 

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.
2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant ApexHeli Oregon, Inc. an exemption from 14 CFR 

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow ApexHeli to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations

described below.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of ApexHeli are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the ApexHeli part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2016, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
# C_2023222EN.01003701.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/37

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11131 – PIERER / LEONI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 222/11)

On 13 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11131. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11131. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
### §104904. Hire of work animals, vehicles, and equipment with or without personal services

The Secretary may hire, with or without personal services, work animals and animal-drawn and motor-propelled vehicles and equipment at rates to be approved by the Secretary and without compliance with section 6101 of title 41.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3168.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 104904 | 16 U.S.C. 17i. | May 26, 1930, ch. 324, §10, 46 Stat. 383. |

Section

The word "Secretary" is substituted for "National Park Service" to reflect the transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of the Department of the Interior to the Secretary by sections 1 and 2 of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1950 (5 U.S.C. App.). The reference to section 16 of title 41 is omitted as obsolete because section 3744 of the Revised Statutes, classified to 41 U.S.C. 16, was repealed by the Act of October 21, 1941 (ch. 452, 55 Stat. 743).
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

     Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of GPS Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

                  (i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
         quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                  (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 14, 2007                              By: /s/ JOSEPH MILLER
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Joseph Miller
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### § 77.502-1 Qualified person.

A qualified person within the meaning of § 77.502 is an individual who meets the requirements of § 77.103.
* The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3783

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Patrick L. Bark, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 20, 2002 Filed: May 29, 2002

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. On appeal from the district court's * revocation of Patrick L. Bark's supervised release and imposition of an additional term of imprisonment, Bark's counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although Bark was granted permission to file a supplemental brief, he has not done so.-2- Having reviewed counsel's Anders brief, we reject counsel's argument that the district court abused its discretion by imposing imprisonment in excess of the Chapter 7 Sentencing Guidelines range and by not considering the severity of Bark's medical condition. (Bark testified he needed double knee replacements and had been unable to have the surgery in prison.) The Chapter 7 ranges are merely advisory, see United States v. Holmes , 283 F.3d 966, 968 (8th Cir. 2002), and the district court–which was fully apprised of Barks's medical condition–was not required to impose a lesser sentence on that basis. Indeed, the district court considered the Chapter 7 policy statements and believed the Guidelines range was inadequate to promote respect for the law, afford adequate deterrents to criminal conduct, and protect the public from further crimes. Having reviewed the record independently, we find no other nonfrivolous issues for appeal. SeePenson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We thus affirm the district court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1316 Preparation before blasting. ( a ) ( 1 ) All nonbattery-powered electric equipment, including cables, located within 50 feet from boreholes to be loaded with explosives or the sites where sheathed explosive units are to be placed and fired shall be deenergized or removed to at least 50 feet from these locations before priming of explosives. Battery-powered equipment shall be removed to at least 50 feet from these locations before priming of explosives.
( 2 ) As an alternative to paragraph (a)(1) of this section, electric equipment, including cables, need not be deenergized or removed if located at least 25 feet from these locations provided stray current tests conducted prior to priming the explosives detect stray currents of 0.05 ampere or less through a 1-ohm resistor. ( i ) Tests shall be made at floor locations on the perimeter, on energized equipment frames and on repaired areas of energized cables within the area between 25 to 50 feet from the locations where the explosives are to be primed.
( ii ) Tests shall be conducted using a blasting multimeter or other instrument specifically designed for such use.
( 3 ) The blasting cable or detonator circuitry shall not come in contact with energized electric equipment, including cables.
( b ) Before loading boreholes with explosives, each borehole shall be cleared and its depth and direction determined.
( c ) No borehole drilled beyond the depth of cut coal shall be loaded with explosives unless that portion of the borehole deeper than the cut is tamped with noncombustible material.
( d ) When two working faces are approaching each other, cutting, drilling and blasting shall be done at only one working face at a time if the two faces are within 25 feet of each other.
[35 FR 17890, Nov. 20, 1970, as amended at 56 FR 51616, Oct. 11, 1991]
# TablesLibrary (5)
The Wyoming Greater Sage-Grouse 

Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment 

and 

Final Environmental Impact Statement 

Volume 3: Chapters 4–5, Acronyms, Glossary, 

and Literature Cited 

May 2015 
BLM/WY/PL-15/015+1610 

The BLM’s multiple-use mission is to sustain the health and productivity of the 

public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. The 

Bureau accomplishes this by managing such activities as outdoor recreation, 

livestock grazing, mineral development, and energy production, and by 

conserving natural, historical, cultural, and other resources on public lands. 

The mission of the USDA Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity, and 

productivity of the Nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present 

and future generations.
Exhibit 32 (b)



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                            
|------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: 3/10/04 |  | /s/ Thomas K. Derbyshire   
|              |  | Vice President, Treasurer  
|              |  | Principal Financial Officer
### §70706. Public meetings, information, and hearings

(a) Public Meetings and Release of Public Versions of Reports.—A Commission shall—

(1) hold public hearings and meetings to the extent appropriate; and

(2) release public versions of the reports required under this chapter.

(b) Public Hearings.—Any public hearings of a Commission shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the protection of information provided to or developed for or by the Commission as required by any applicable statute, regulation, or Executive order.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3434.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70706 | 42 U.S.C. 16846. | Pub. L. 109–155, title VIII, §826, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2943. |

Section
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the annual report of Energroup Holdings Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Shi Huashan, Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:
      March 31, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Shi
      HuashanShi
      HuashanChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9697 

To reallocate funds from the Internal Revenue Service to the Secret Service, 

for purposes of providing protection equivalent to that afforded the 

President to Vice Presidents, major Presidential and Vice Presidential 

candidates, and former presidents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 

Mrs. HOUCHIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reallocate funds from the Internal Revenue Service to 

the Secret Service, for purposes of providing protection 

equivalent to that afforded the President to Vice Presidents, major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates, and former presidents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Presidential Election 

5 Resource Investment for Major Threat Response Act of 

6 2024’’ or as the ‘‘PERIMTR Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9697 IH

1 SEC. 2. REALLOCATION OF FUNDS. 

2 (a) RESCISSION.—There is rescinded from the unobli3 gated balances of amounts made available under section 

4 10301(1) of Public Law 117–169 (commonly known as 

5 the ‘‘Inflation Reduction Act of 2022’’) (136 Stat. 2053) 

6 $3,000,000,000. 

7 (b) APPROPRIATION.—There is appropriated to the 

8 Director of the United States Secret Service 

9 $3,000,000,000, to remain available until expended, for 

10 the purpose of applying the same standards, practices, and 

11 protocols for protecting the President to protecting Vice 

12 Presidents, major Presidential and Vice Presidential can13 didates, and former presidents. These standards, prac14 tices, and protocols include the number of agents, equip15 ment, and other assets needed to carry out the require16 ments of this subsection. 

17 (c) DEFINITION.—In this Act, the term ‘‘major Pres18 idential and Vice Presidential candidates’’ has the mean19 ing given such term in section 3056 of title 18, United 

20 States Code, and includes any other Presidential or Vice 

21 Presidential candidate for whom the President has other22 wise authorized the Secret Service to protect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### SUBCHAPTER III—TRANSPORTATION OF REMAINS, DEPENDENTS, AND EFFECTS
#### § 873.11 Applicability.

The provisions of this part apply to funds awarded, as defined in § 872.5 of this chapter, under section 402(g)(6)(A) of SMCRA before its amendment on December 20, 2006, and their use by the States or Indian tribes for coal reclamation purposes after September 30, 1995.

[73 FR 67638, Nov. 14, 2008]
#### Ana Perez, as Administratrix of the Estate of Leonarda Pichardo, Deceased, Respondent, v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation et al., Appellants.

[832 NYS2d 435]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J), entered November 13, 2006, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Based upon the medical history given to defendants in the emergency room, the normal test results for vital signs taken at the time, the physical examination results and the decedent’s own complaints, which were limited to musculoskeletal ailments, there was no evidence that defendants deviated from accepted medical standards. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.