alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DRAVO
CORPORATION'S MARCH 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            4737
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    22366
<ALLOWANCES>                                       700
<INVENTORY>                                      16743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 44164
<PP&E>                                          267305
<DEPRECIATION>                                  123972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  252627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            41186
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         15111
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            15000
<PREFERRED>                                         16
<OTHER-SE>                                       96878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    252627
<SALES>                                          42374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 42374
<CGS>                                            32366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    32366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3639
<INCOME-TAX>                                       673
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2966
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|    |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    | 
|(3) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jack C. BridgesJack C. BridgesExecutive Vice-PresidentAugust 11, 2006Date
#### § 920.1 Scope.

This part contains all rules applicable only within Maryland that have been adopted under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.

[45 FR 79449, Dec. 1, 1980]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9433 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9433

To direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct a threat analysis of any 
potential threats the illicit fentanyl drug trade poses to the defense 
                    interests of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 30, 2024

 Mr. Gallego introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct a threat analysis of any 
potential threats the illicit fentanyl drug trade poses to the defense 
                    interests of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THREAT ANALYSIS REGARDING FENTANYL CRISIS.

    (a) Threat Analysis.--The Secretary of Defense, in consultation 
with the Director of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and Office of 
the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Counternarcotics and 
Stabilization Policy, shall conduct a threat analysis of any potential 
threats the illicit fentanyl drug trade poses to the defense interests 
of the United States. The threat analysis shall contain the following:
            (1) An analysis of the illicit fentanyl drug trade, 
        including the manufacture, distribution, and sale or trade, and 
        trans-shipment of fentanyl and fentanyl-related substances.
            (2) An analysis of new or emerging techniques or 
        technologies that are likely to affect the evolution of the 
        illicit fentanyl drug trade.
    (b) Report.--Not later than March 31, 2025, and annually thereafter 
for each of the next four years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report that includes each of 
the following:
            (1) The threat analysis required under subsection (a), 
        including any recommendations of the Secretary for any related 
        actions.
            (2) Any actions the Department of Defense has taken in 
        response to such threat analysis.
            (3) Any other matter the Secretary determines appropriate.
    (c) Congressional Defense Committees.--In this section, the term 
``congressional defense committees'' has the meaning given that term in 
section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 0338

_____________________________
D EMETRE A NTOINE M OORE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. William E. Davis , Judge

. July 2, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. See Atwater v. State , 233 So. 3d 1276 ( Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

B.L. T HOMAS , C.J.
, and O STERHAUS and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Su ber , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
### §303102. Funding

For each of fiscal years 2012 to 2023,1 $150,000,000 shall be deposited in the Historic Preservation Fund from revenues due and payable to the United States under section 9 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1338), section 8733(b) of title 10, or both, notwithstanding any provision of law that those proceeds shall be credited to miscellaneous receipts of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3206; Pub. L. 114–289, title VIII, §802(a), (c)(1), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1494, 1495; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §809(s), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1844.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 303102 | 16 U.S.C. 470h (last paragraph 1st sentence). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §108 (last paragraph 1st sentence), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 917; Pub. L. 91–243, §1(a), May 9, 1970, 84 Stat. 204; Pub. L. 93–54, §1(a), July 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 139; Pub. L. 94–422, title II, §201(4), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1320; Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §205, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2995; Pub. L. 100–127, Oct. 9, 1987, 101 Stat. 800; Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4011, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4760; Pub. L. 106–208, §§2, 5(a)(7), May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 318, 319; Pub. L. 109–453, §1(c), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3367. |

Section

Reference to fiscal years 1977–2011 is omitted as obsolete.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "section 8733(b) of title 10" for "section 7433(b) of title 10".

2016—Pub. L. 114–289 substituted "Funding" for "Contents" in section catchline and "2023" for "2015" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

#### Application of Section

Pub. L. 118–42, div. E, title I, §122, Mar. 9, 2024, 138 Stat. 249, provided that: "Section 303102 of title 54, United States Code, shall be applied by substituting 'fiscal year 2024' for 'fiscal year 2023'."

1 See Application of Section note below.
FILED 

Bowen Greenwood 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

STATE OF MONTANA 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 23-0651

ALLISON SWEEM, individually and 

as Personal Representative of the 

ESTATE OF BRANDON E. 

ROBERTS,

Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, 

v.

FLATHEAD COUNTY, a political 

subdivision of the State of Montana, 

and DOES 1-10, 

Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

GRANT OF EXTENSION 

Upon review of Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension to File 

Appellants Opening Brief and with good cause;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time 

up to and including January 8, 2024 in which to file and serve its opening brief. 

11/27/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0651

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

November 27 2023

11/27/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0651
#### § 1803.22 Requests barred by res judicata.

The Coordinator shall respond to the requester and deny any request where the information in question has been the subject of a classification review within the previous two (2) years or is the subject of pending litigation in the federal courts.
### §100753. Disposal of timber

The Secretary, on terms and conditions to be fixed by the Secretary, may sell or dispose of timber in cases where, in the judgment of the Secretary, the cutting of timber is required to control attacks of insects or diseases or otherwise conserve the scenery or the natural or historic objects in any System unit.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3111.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 100753 | 16 U.S.C. 3 (2d sentence). | Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, §3 (2d sentence), 39 Stat. 535. |

Section
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Capstead Mortgage Corporation of our report dated January 28, 2004, included
in the 2003 Annual Report to Stockholders of Capstead Mortgage Corporation. We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements and the related prospectuses, of our report dated January 28, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Capstead Mortgage
Corporation incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003:

         o        Form S-8 (No. 33-40017);

         o        Form S-3 (No. 33-62212);

         o        Form S-8 (No. 33-53555);

         o        Form S-3 (No. 333-03187);

         o        Form S-8 (No. 333-12719);

         o        Form S-3 (No. 333-26419) and Amendment No.1 thereto;

         o        Form S-8 (No. 333-27215);

         o        Form S-3 (No. 333-43169) and Amendment No.1 thereto;

         o        Form S-3 (No. 333-63358);

         o        Form S-3 (No. 333-68424) and Amendment No.1 thereto; and

         o        Form S-3 (No. 333-112900).



                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Dallas, Texas
March 3, 2004
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. BERKMAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Israel Berkman. O. A. Rosaisky, for appellant. R. O. Taylor, for the People.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1057 

Denouncing calls for a cease-fire in Gaza. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2024 

Mr. GOOD of Virginia (for himself, Mr. OGLES, Ms. MACE, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. 

HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. POSEY, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. 

DONALDS, Mr. CLYDE, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. BRECHEEN, Mr. PALMER, Mr. EZELL, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. BIGGS, and Mr. BURLISON) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Denouncing calls for a cease-fire in Gaza. 

Whereas Hamas brutally attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, 

causing the death of over 1,200 Israeli citizens, including 

women and children; 

Whereas the United Nations Relief and Works Agency 

(UNRWA) employed several Hamas terror operatives; 

Whereas the Biden administration has funded UNRWA with 

over $1,000,000,000 American taxpayer dollars; 

Whereas the Biden administration restarted aid to the Palestinian Authority, which President Trump had suspended; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1057 IH 

Whereas additional developmental aid to any Palestinian entity is illegal under the Taylor Force Act, after dozens of 

American citizens were killed under the Biden administration’s watch by terrorists affiliated with Hamas and 

the Palestinian Authority, including on October 7; 

Whereas the Palestinian Authority continues to pay salaries 

to terrorists and their families who have murdered American citizens; 

Whereas progressive interest groups have demanded President Biden call for a cease-fire that would result in the 

laying down of arms by Israel and increased offensive 

measures by Hamas; 

Whereas those same groups are demanding the establishment 

of an independent State of Palestine; 

Whereas the Arabs rejected the 1947 United Nations Partition plan to establish an independent State of Palestine; 

and 

Whereas the United States unequivocally stands with Israel 

and its indisputable right to defend itself: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) denounces calls for a cease-fire in Gaza; 

3 (2) calls for an end of United States funding of 

4 Hamas via UNRWA; 

5 (3) condemns calls for the establishment of an 

6 independent State of Palestine; and 

7 (4) calls for a termination of United States as8 sistance to Palestinian entities, government officials, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1057 IH 

1 relief agencies, and NGOs until an independent and 

2 comprehensive investigation is completed. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 1290.4 Definitions. For the purpose of this part 1290 the following definitions apply: This part 1290 supersedes part 1290 April 26, 1972. ( a ) *Law Enforcement Personnel.* Persons authorized by the Head of the PLFA to direct, regulate, control traffic; to make apprehensions or arrests for violations of traffic regulations; or to issue citations or tickets. Personnel so designated will include the Command Security Officer and all other personnel in 080, 083, 085, or 1800 series positions.
( b ) *Minor Federal Offenses.* Those offenses for which the authorized penalty does not exceed imprisonment for a period of 1 year, or a fine of not more than $1000, or both (18 U.S.C. 3401f).
( c ) *Petty Federal Offenses.* Those offenses for which the authorized penalty does not exceed imprisonment for a period of 6 months or a fine of not more than $500, or both (18 U.S.C. 1(3)). Note:
A petty offense is a type of minor offense.
( d ) *Violation Notice.* DD Form 1805, Violation Notice, which will be used to refer all petty offenses to the U.S. Magistrate/District Courts for disposition.
Note:
A complaint, made under oath on forms provided by the magistrate, is the prescribed form for charging minor offenses other than petty offenses.
Order entered December 19, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00751-CV

NIKOLAY VLADOV, TEODORA ARSOVA, AND ELENA ARSOVA,

Appellants

V.

AUTOHAUS, LLC D/B/A EWING AUTOMOTIVE GROUP AND 

MERCEDES BENZ OF PLANO, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 002-02979-2020

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Antoinette Varela’s December 16, 2022 

request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the 

request and ORDER the record be filed no later than January 20, 2023.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
§ 947.772 Requirements for coal exploration. ( a ) Part 772 of this chapter, *Requirements for Coal Exploration,* shall apply to any person who conducts or seeks to conduct coal exploration operations.
( b ) The Office shall make every effort to act on an exploration application within 60 days of receipt or such longer time as may be reasonable under the circumstances. If additional time is needed, OSMRE shall notify the applicant that the application is being reviewed, but that more time is necessary to complete such review, setting forth the reasons and the additional time that is needed.
[52 FR 13816, Apr. 24, 1987]
#### § 150.26 Internal rules.

The Chief Judge of the Court has the authority to prescribe internal rules for the Court.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9751 

To include certain executive and judicial actions in the baseline calculation 

by the Congressional Budget Office, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 

Mr. ESTES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Budget 

A BILL 

To include certain executive and judicial actions in the baseline calculation by the Congressional Budget Office, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Executive Action Cost 

5 Transparency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVING BASELINE DATA BY INCLUDING EXECU7 TIVE AND JUDICIAL ACTIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 257 of the Balanced 

9 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9751 IH

1 U.S.C. 907) is amended by adding at the end the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(f) EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL ACTIONS.—To the 

4 extent practicable, any calculation of the baseline and any 

5 update shall include any judicial action and any executive 

6 action (including any proposed rule, final rule, executive 

7 order, or memorandum) consistent with the scorekeeping 

8 guidelines determined under section 252(d)(5).’’. 

9 (b) SEPARATE TABLE IN REPORT.—Section 

10 202(e)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 

11 U.S.C. 602) is amended by adding at the end the fol12 lowing: ‘‘To the extent practicable, the report and any up13 date to the report shall include a table of any judicial ac14 tion and any executive action described in section 257(f) 

15 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 

16 Act of 1985 that was issued on or after the last publica17 tion of the report or the most recent update to the report 

18 (as the case may be) if the Director estimates the judicial 

19 action or the executive action has budgetary effects of at 

20 least $50,000,000,000 during the current year, budget 

21 year, and the nine years following the budget year. Any 

22 proposed executive action shall be assumed to be final for 

23 purposes of determining whether to include the proposed 

24 action in the table and shall only be included consistent 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9751 IH

1 with the scorekeeping guidelines determined under section 

2 252(d)(5) of such Act.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
§ 56.4603 Closure of valves. To prevent accidental release of gases from hoses and torches attached to oxygen and acetylene cylinders or to manifold systems, cylinder or manifold system valves shall be closed when— ( a ) The cylinders are moved;
( b ) The torch and hoses are left unattended; or
( c ) The task or series of tasks is completed.
### SUBCHAPTER III—OVERSEAS DIFFERENTIALS AND ALLOWANCES
# C_2008142EN.01002302.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/23

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 April 2004 — KONGRA-GEL and Others v Council

(Case T-253/04) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Action for annulment - Statement of reasons)

(2008/C 142/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: KONGRA-GEL and the nine other applicants whose names are shown in the annex to the judgment (represented by M. Muller QC, E. Grieves and C. Vine, Barristers, and J.G. Pierce, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by E. Finnegan and D. Canga Fano, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by R. Caudwell, and subsequently by E. Jenkinson, Agents, and S. Lee, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

First, the partial annulment of Council Decision 2004/306/EC of 2 April 2004 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2003/902/EC (OJ 2004 L 99, p. 28), and of Regulation No 2580/2001 (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 70), and, secondly, damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision 2004/306/EC of 2 April 2004 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2003/902/EC in so far as it concerns KONGRA-GEL; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision 2004/306/EC of 2 April 2004 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2003/902/EC in so far as it concerns KONGRA-GEL;

| 2. | Orders the Council to bear, in addition to its own costs, all the costs incurred by the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council to bear, in addition to its own costs, all the costs incurred by the applicants;

Orders the Council to bear, in addition to its own costs, all the costs incurred by the applicants

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay its own costs.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay its own costs

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---