alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
w
a USGS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
science forachanging world U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1411-B

Transmissivity of and maximum yields from the Weber-De Chelly zone—PLATE 8
Geldon, AL, 2002, Hydrologic properties and ground-water flow systems of the Paleazoic rocks in the Upper
Colorado River Basin in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, excluding the San Juan Basin

36°
107-239

GSS

EPNG N-1 7
and N-2

Th <
ah;

P3ymington

AREA EXCLUDED FROM Ty }
ip

107°

= 36°

JS

1:2,000,000

4.700%
Leupp 0 25 50 78 100 MILES
ae | N | l J
I T T T T
0 25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS.
COMPOSITE TRANSMISSIVITY

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO
RIVER BASIN

Castle fone
; 7

be

oo

1:2,000,000
25 50 75 100 MILES
| | 1 J
T T T T
25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS
MAXIMUM YIELDS

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO
RIVER BASIN

Pagosa
Springs g

Composite Transmissivity

Maximum Yields

—100-—

EXPLANATION

Area where the Weber-De Chelly zone is missing because of erosion or
nondeposition

Relative composite transmissivity
Large
Moderate
Small

Line of equal estimated composite transmissivity—Location is approximate.
Interval, in feet squared per day, is variable

Aquifer test from which transmissivity was determined—Number shown is
transmissivity, in feet squared per day. Labeled wells are listed in table 15

Relative maximum yield
Large
Moderate
Small

Line of equal yield from wells and springs under artesian conditions—
Dashed where approximately located. Interval, in gallons per minute, is
variable

Limit of data

Data sites
Borehole—Discharge during a drill-stem test, flow into a well during drilling,

or flow from a well after completion is indicated. Wells mentioned in text

are labeled

Spring—Moderate to large springs mentioned in the text and other large
springs are labeled

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. base map, 1:2,500,000

By
Arthur L. Geldon
2002

COMPOSITE TRANSMISSIVITY OF AND MAXIMUM YIELDS FROM THE WEBER-DE CHELLY ZONE OF THE CANYONLANDS AQUIFER IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN AND VICINITY
IN ARIZONA, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, UTAH, AND WYOMING
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundary

VRM Class I

VRM Class II

VRM Class III

VRM Class IV

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 3-22: BLM Visual Resource 

Management Classifications
#### In the Matter of Wilbur N. Creswell, as Administrator of the Estate of James J. Stiehle, Deceased, Respondent, v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to section 618 of the Insurance Law, by petitioner, as the administrator of the estate of James J. Stiehle, deceased, for the court’s permission to institute an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation to recover damages for decedent’s wrongful death, the corporation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 25, 1961, which granted the application and which gave petitioner the permission requested. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
### §5402. Definitions

For the purpose of this chapter—

(1) "agency" means an Executive agency under section 105, but does not include the Government Accountability Office;

(2) "employee" includes—

(A) an individual paid under a statutory pay system defined in section 5302(1);

(B) a prevailing rate employee, as defined in section 5342(a)(2); and

(C) a category of employees included by the Office of Personnel Management following the review of an agency plan under section 5403(b)(1);

but does not include—

(i) an individual paid at an annual rate of basic pay for a level of the Executive Schedule, under subchapter II of chapter 53, or at a rate provided for one of those levels under another provision of law;

(ii) a member of the Senior Executive Service paid under subchapter VIII of chapter 53, or an equivalent system;

(iii) an administrative law judge paid under section 5372;

(iv) a contract appeals board member paid under section 5372a;

(v) an administrative appeals judge paid under section 5372b; and

(vi) an individual in a position which is excepted from the competitive service because of its confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character; and

(3) "Office" means the Office of Personnel Management.

(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title XI, §1129(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1642; amended Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5402, added Pub. L. 95–454, title V, §501, Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1181; amended Pub. L. 98–615, title II, §201(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3208, related to applicability of chapter, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–89, §3(a)(1), (c), Sept. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 981, 983, eff. Nov. 1, 1993.

#### Amendments

2004—Par. (1). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office".
(41 Misc. Rep. 428.)

#### TOWN OF EAST FISHKILL v. TOWN OF WAPPINGER.

(Supreme Court, Trial Term, Dutchess County.

October, 1903.)

1. Bridges—Liability of Towns—Repairs.

Laws 1890, p. 1201, c. 568, § 130, making towns jointly liable for the cost of repairing bridges over a stream forming the boundary line, applies when the boundary is along one side of the stream as well as when it runs through the middle thereof.

Action by the town of East Fishkill against the town of Wappinger to recover one-half of the expense of repairing bridges over a boundary stream. Judgment for plaintiff.

The town of Fishkill in Dutchess county was divided in 1849 by an act of the board of supervisors, the new town of East Fishkill (the plaintiff) being created thereby. The line of division was east along Fishkill creek to its junction with Sprout creek, “then up and along the west bank of said Sprout creek to,” etc. The territory to the east of this line was constituted as the new town. Chapter 411, p. 701, Laws 1852. By still another division of the town of Fishkill (chapter 400, p. 476, Laws 1875) this territory along the west side of Sprout creek became of the town of Wappinger (the defendant).

Charles A. Hopkins, for plaintiff.

George Wood and C. Morschauser, for defendant.

GAYNOR, J.

If the words, “thence up and along the west bank of said Sprout creek,” established the line along the west bank instead of along the middle of Sprout creek, which is doubtful (Gouverneur v. National Ice Co., 134 N. Y. 355, 31 N. E. 865, 18 L. R. A. 695, 30 Am. Sti Rep. 669), the creek lies wholly within the town of East Fishkill, the plaintiff. But even so, I think both towns are jointly liable for the repair of the bridges over it. The statute is that in case of bridges “over streams or other waters forming the boundary

*1068line of towns,” such joint liability exists. Highway Law, § 130, chapter 568, p. 1201, Laws 1890. Though the line be along the west bank, it is formed by the creek as much as though it were along the middle. Whether the line touches and follows the water only along its edge, or is in the stream a foot, or to the middle, does not make a different case. The statute has to be interpreted liberally, for its intention is to make two towns share equally the expense of bridges which abut on each town for the use of both towns, and that is necessarily the case whether the town line be at the bank or in the middle.

Judgment for the plaintiff.
### §442a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 442a, comprising section 1102 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3232 of this title.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10(r)

                               SECOND AMENDMENT OF
                            INTEGRA BANK CORPORATION
                             EMPLOYEES' 401(k) PLAN

            This Second Amendment of Integra Bank Corporation Employees' 401(k)
Plan is adopted by Integra Bank Corporation.

                                   Background

      1.    Effective July 1, 2000, Integra Bank Corporation ("Employer")
amended and completely restated  the Integra Bank Corporation Employees'
401(k) Plan ("Plan").

      2.    The Plan was amended by the First Amendment executed March 7,
2001.

      3.    The Employer wishes to amend the Plan further.

                                    Amendment

            Therefore the Plan is amended as follows:

            Effective immediately, a new Section 14.06 is added to the Plan to
read as follows:

            Section 14.06. Transfers From Merged Plans. Upon the merger of the
following named plans (the "Merged Plans") into the Plan, the Trust shall accept
all assets of the Merged Plans from the trusts of the Merged Plans:

      Bank of Illinois in Mt. Vernon 401(k) Plan (the "Bank of Illinois Plan")
      Community First Financial, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the "Community First Plan")
      First State Bank of Vienna 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the "Vienna Plan")
      PBI 401(k) Plan (the "PBI Plan")
      Illinois One Bancorp, Inc., 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the "Illinois One
      Plan").

Except as otherwise provided in Section 14.01 and this Section, the assets
transferred to the Plan from the Merged Plans shall be administered in
accordance with the provisions of this Plan. Notwithstanding the preceding
sentence, the following benefits shall be preserved with respect to the
transferred assets:

            (a)   Bank of Illinois. At any time upon reaching age 59-1/2,
Participants may withdraw from their Accounts any amounts attributable to assets
transferred from the Bank of Illinois Plan.
<PAGE>
            (b)   Community First Plan. At any time upon reaching age 59-1/2,
Participants may withdraw from their Accounts any amounts attributable to their
elective deferral contributions to the Community First Plan; and at any time
upon reaching age 65, or upon reaching age 55 with 6 years of service,
Participants may withdraw from their Accounts any amounts attributable to the
assets transferred from the Community First Plan.

            (c)   PBI Plan. At any time upon reaching age 59-1/2, Participants
may withdraw from their Accounts any amounts attributable to assets transferred
from the PBI Plan.

            (d)   Illinois One Plan. At any time, Participants may withdraw from
their Accounts any amounts attributable to their rollover contributions to the
Illinois One Plan.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-138-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended March 31, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                  3,268
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             378
<ALLOWANCES>                                1
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        3,658
<PP&E>                                 62,278
<DEPRECIATION>                         15,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         52,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     515
<BONDS>                                16,140
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             35,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           52,242
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        5,108
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           4,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (256)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (256)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            (256)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-20-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-0338

_____________________________

DEMETRE ANTOINE MOORE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

William E. Davis, Judge.

July 2, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Atwater v. State, 233 So. 3d 1276 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2018).

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and OSTERHAUS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Universal Detection Technology (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacques Tizabi, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
the Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.



Date: April 16, 2009


By: /s/ Jacques Tizabi
    ------------------
Jacques Tizabi,
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

85 FR 81961, December 17, 2020

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 

Monday, December 21, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING: 

The Closed Meeting scheduled for Monday, December 21, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. has been changed to Monday, December 21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 18, 2020.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-28540 Filed 12-21-20; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
### §2746. Conceptual and construction design

#### (a) Conceptual design

#### (1) Requirement

Subject to paragraph (2) and except as provided in paragraph (3), before submitting to Congress a request for funds for a construction project that is in support of a national security program of the Department of Energy, the Secretary of Energy shall complete a conceptual design for that project.

#### (2) Requests for conceptual design funds

If the estimated cost of completing a conceptual design for a construction project exceeds $5,000,000, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a request for funds for the conceptual design before submitting a request for funds for the construction project.

#### (3) Exceptions

The requirement in paragraph (1) does not apply to a request for funds—

(A) for a construction project the total estimated cost of which is less than the minor construction threshold; or

(B) for emergency planning, design, and construction activities under section 2747 of this title.

#### (b) Construction design

#### (1) Authority

Within the amounts authorized by a DOE national security authorization, the Secretary may carry out construction design (including architectural and engineering services) in connection with any proposed construction project if the total estimated cost for such design does not exceed $5,000,000.

#### (2) Limitation on availability of funds for certain projects

If the total estimated cost for construction design in connection with any construction project exceeds $5,000,000, funds for that design must be specifically authorized by law.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVII, §4706, formerly div. C, title XXXVI, §3625, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2759; renumbered div. D, title XLVII, §4706, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(j)(2)(A)–(C), (D)(ii), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1781; Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3120, Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1059; Pub. L. 114–328, div. C, title XXXI, §3121, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2764; Pub. L. 117–81, div. C, title XXXI, §3115(c), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2227.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 7386e of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 108–136.

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–81 substituted "$5,000,000" for "$2,000,000" in two places.

2016—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 114–328, §3121(a), substituted "$5,000,000" for "$3,000,000".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–328, §3121(b), substituted "$2,000,000" for "$1,000,000" in two places.

2013—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 113–66 substituted "$1,000,000" for "$600,000" in two places.

2003—Subsec. (a)(3)(B). Pub. L. 108–136, §3141(j)(2)(D)(ii), made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 2747 of this title.