alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Department of the Air Force

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        On November 23, 2020, the United States Air Force (USAF) signed the Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the                               ( print page 84308)                            Edwards Air Force Base (AFB) Solar Project.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Mr. Mike Ackerman, AFCEC/CZN, Bldg 1, 2261 Hughes Ave (STE 155), JBSA-Lackland, TX 78236-9853, (210) 925-2741;                         *michael.ackerman.2@us.af.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The USAF has decided to lease up to 4,000 acres of undeveloped, non-excess land at Edwards AFB to a developer for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a solar photovoltaic renewable energy project.

                    The Air Force's decision, documented in the Record of Decision, was based on analysis provided in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, and includes inputs from the public and regulatory agencies. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was made available to the public on January 24, 2020 through a Notice of Availability in the                     **Federal Register**                     (Volume 85, Number 16, Page 4320) with a review period that ended on February 24, 2020.                

Authority:                         This Notice of Availability is published pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR part 1506.6) implementing the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321,                         *et seq.*) and the Air Force's Environmental Impact Analysis Process (32 CFR parts 989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7)).                    

Adriane S. Paris,

Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2020-28572 Filed 12-23-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
### §8454. Medical examination

An annuitant receiving a disability retirement annuity from the Fund shall be examined under the direction of the Office—

(1) at the end of 1 year from the date of the disability retirement; and

(2) annually thereafter until becoming 60 years of age;

unless the disability is permanent in character. If the annuitant fails to submit to examination as required by this section, payment of the annuity shall be suspended until continuance of the disability is satisfactorily established.

(Added Pub. L. 99–335, title I, §101(a), June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 568.)
---

EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry R. Lazar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Terry R. LazarTerry R. LazarChief Financial Officer





April 13, 2010
#### § 1800.41 Appeal authority.

The Director, NACIC will make final NACIC decisions from appeals of initial adverse decisions under the Freedom of Information Act and such other information release decisions made under parts 1801, 1802, and 1803 of this chapter. Matters decided by the Director, NACIC will be deemed a final decision by NACIC.
#### SCHAUB, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by Barbara Eyer Schaub, as executrix of Jacob Schaub, deceased, against the state of New York.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statement
No.  333-30895 on Form S-8 of our report dated  August 15, 1997  (September  19,
1997 as to Note 11),  appearing in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Phar-Mor,
Inc.  for the year ended June 28,  1997.  Our report  expresses  an  unqualified
opinion on the consolidated balance sheets of Phar-Mor, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of June 28, 1997 and June 29, 1996 and the related  consolidated  statements  of
operations,  changes in stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the
fifty-two  weeks  ended June 28, 1997 and the  forty-three  weeks ended June 29,
1996. Our report expresses a qualified opinion on the consolidated statements of
operations,  changes  in  stockholders'  equity  (deficiency)  and cash flows of
Phar-Mor,  Inc. and  subsidiaries for the nine weeks ended September 2, 1995 and
the  fifty-two  weeks  ended July 1, 1995 as  reliable  accounting  records  and
sufficient  evidential  matter to support the  acquisition  cost of property and
equipment were not available. Also, our report includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the  comparability  of financial  information  prior to September 2,
1995 as a result of Phar-Mor's  emergence from  bankruptcy and the creation of a
new entity.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

September 24, 1997
#### Roland R. Benzow, Individually and as District Councilman of the City of Buffalo, Appellant, v. Joseph J. Cooley, as City Clerk of the City of Buffalo, et al., Respondents.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### §6505. Telework Managing Officer

(a) Designation.—The head of each executive agency shall designate an employee of the agency as the Telework Managing Officer. The Telework Managing Officer shall be established within the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer or a comparable office with similar functions.

(b) Duties.—The Telework Managing Officer shall—

(1) be devoted to policy development and implementation related to agency telework programs;

(2) serve as—

(A) an advisor for agency leadership, including the Chief Human Capital Officer;

(B) a resource for managers and employees; and

(C) a primary agency point of contact for the Office of Personnel Management on telework matters; and

(3) perform other duties as the applicable delegating authority may assign.

(c) Status Within Agency.—The Telework Managing Officer of an agency shall be a senior official of the agency who has direct access to the head of the agency.

(d) Rule of Construction Regarding Status of Telework Managing Officer.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit an individual who holds another office or position in an agency from serving as the Telework Managing Officer for the agency under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 111–292, §2(a), Dec. 9, 2010, 124 Stat. 3168.)
### **CHAPTER 4—INSPECTORS GENERAL**

Sec.
401.
Definitions.
402.
Establishment and purpose of Offices of Inspector General.
403.
Appointments.
404.
Duties and responsibilities.
405.
Reports.
406.
Authority of Inspector General.
407.
Complaints by employees.
408.
Additional provisions with respect to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense.
409.
Special provisions concerning the Agency for International Development.
410.
Special provisions concerning the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
411.
Special provisions concerning the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
412.
Special provisions concerning the Department of the Treasury.
413.
Special provisions concerning the Department of Justice.
414.
Special provisions concerning the Corporation for National and Community Service.
415.
Requirements for Federal entities and designated Federal entities.
416.
Additional provisions with respect to Inspectors General of the intelligence community.
417.
Special provisions concerning the Department of Homeland Security.
418.
Rule of construction of special provisions.
419.
Special provisions concerning overseas contingency operations.
420.
Information on websites of Offices of Inspectors General.
421.
Additional provisions with respect to the Department of Energy.
422.
Transfer of functions.
423.
Pay of Inspectors General.
424.
Establishment of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.524 Electric face equipment; electric equipment used in return air outby the last open crosscut; maximum level of alternating or direct electric current between frames of equipment.

The maximum level of alternating or direct electric current that exists between the frames of any two units of electric face equipment that come in contact with each other in the working places of a coal mine, or between the frames of any two units of electric equipment that come in contact with each other in return air outby the last open crosscut, shall not exceed one ampere as determined from the voltage measured across a 0.1 ohm resistor connected between the frames of such equipment.

[38 FR 29998, Oct. 31, 1973]
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Brian F. Lavin, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the annual report on Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003, by NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership and to which
this certification is appended (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NTS-
Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership and will be retained by NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/ Brian F. Lavin                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|President of NTS Capital Corporation,                               
|General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VI,                    
|General Partner of NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 000300tp
- 00040000
- 00050000
- 00060000
- 00070001
- 00080002
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110003
- 00120004
- 00130005
- 00140006
- 00150007
- 00160008
- 00170009
- 00180010
- 00190011
- 00200012
- 00210000
- 00220000
- 00230000
- 00240000
- 00250000
- 00260000
- 00270000
- 00280000
- 00290000
- 00300000
- 00310000
- 00320000
- 00330000
- 00340000
- 00350000
- 00360000
- 00370000
- 00380000
- 00390013
- 00400014
- 00410015
- 00420016
- 00430017
- 00440018
- 00450019
- 00460020
- 004700bi
- 004800bc
### **CHAPTER 8—CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF AGENCY RULEMAKING**

Sec.
801.
Congressional review.
802.
Congressional disapproval procedure.
803.
Special rule on statutory, regulatory, and judicial deadlines.
804.
Definitions.
805.
Judicial review.
806.
Applicability; severability.
807.
Exemption for monetary policy.
808.
Effective date of certain rules.
EXHIBIT 23.2








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-135158 and 333-16585) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-90512, 333-47258, 333-116348, 333-116349, 333-160346, and 333-160347) of CAS Medical Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2010 except for Note 3 as to which the date is March 24, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CAS Medical Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009, and for the year then ended, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.









/s/ UHY LLP








Houston, Texas


March 24, 2011
# C_2008051EN.01000601.xml

| 23.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsrätten (Sweden)) — Skatteverket v A

(Case C-101/05) (1)

1

(Free movement of capital - Restriction on the movement of capital between the Member States and third countries - Tax on revenue from capital - Dividends received from a company established in an EEA Member State - Exemption - Dividends received from a company established in a third country - Exemption subject to the existence of a taxation convention providing for the exchange of information - Effectiveness of fiscal supervision)

(2008/C 51/09)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Regeringsrätten

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skatteverket

Applicant:

Defendant: A

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regeringsrätten — Interpretation of Articles 56 EC and 58 EC — Taxation, in the case of a taxable person resident in a Member State, in respect of dividends distributed by a company established in a non-member State — National legislation making the exemption of such dividends conditional upon the existence of a taxation convention with the non-member State that contains a provision on exchange of information

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 56 EC and 58 EC are to be interpreted as not precluding the legislation of a Member State which provides that exemption from income tax in respect of dividends distributed in the form of shares in a subsidiary may be granted only if the company making the distribution is established in a State within the EEA or a State with which a taxation convention providing for the exchange of information has been concluded by the Member State imposing the tax, where that exemption is subject to conditions compliance with which can be verified by the competent authorities of that Member State only by obtaining information from the State of establishment of the distributing company.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2005.

1

---
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


OF
      ANNUAL
      REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB


OF
      SIONIX
      CORPORATION


FOR
      THE
      YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007





The
      undersigned is the Chief Executive
      Officer of Sionix Corporation (the "Company"). This certification is made
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification
      accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      September 30, 2007 (the "Report").





I,
      Richard H. Papalian, certify
      that:





(i)      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(ii)     the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      certification is executed as of January 15, 2008





/s/
                Richard H.
                Papalian
              Richard
                H. Papalian
              Chief
                Executive Officer
## Subtitle VII—Access to Space
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Nomination of Alan Greenspan

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	One Hundred Second Congress, 1991-1993. 						*Nomination of Alan Greenspan : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, Second Session, January 29, 1992*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										January 29, 1992,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/276,			accessed on September 13, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30242 Summary Calendar

DARRELL J. GUILLOT, Plaintiff,

versus

BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee,

versus KAREN DEVILLE, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Louisiana

(94-CV-2370)

October 9, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: Having revi ewed the briefs and record, we conclude, essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s well2

considered February 15, 1996, memorandum opinion, that summary judgment was properly granted for appellee-defendant Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. dismiss ing the severed Title VII claim against it of appellant-cross-claimant Karen Deville. The district court’s judgment is accordingly

AFFIRMED.
### SUBCHAPTER I—ANTIDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–54, §2(a)(43), Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 383, added heading for subchapter I.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995             SEP-30-1994
<CASH>                                         290,723                 291,271
<SECURITIES>                                 2,419,275               2,452,966
<RECEIVABLES>                                  421,902                 367,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,293                  26,983
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                          53,697                  90,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,719                  87,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,154,559               3,134,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,205                 100,978
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<COMMON>                                       128,307                 128,307
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,511                  50,511
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,957,536               2,854,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,154,559               3,134,191
<SALES>                                        190,416                  78,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,416                  78,805
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,268                 103,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,124               2,387,616
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                 592,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,124               1,795,616
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,124               1,795,616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01                    1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01                    1.38
        

</TABLE>
#### Trebuhs Realty Co., Inc., et al. v. 210 Central Park South Corporation et al.

Motion for a stay denied. Concur — Valente, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.