alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 870.20 How to calculate excess moisture in LOW-rank coals. Here are the requirements for calculating the excess moisture in low-rank coals for a calendar quarter. ASTM standards D2234-89, *Standard Test Methods for Collection of a Gross Sample of Coal;* D3302-91, *Standard Test Method for Total Moisture in Coal;* and, D1412-93, *Standard Test Method for Equilibrium Moisture of Coal at 96 to 97 Percent Relative Humidity and 30 °C* are incorporated by reference as published in the 1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 05.05. The Director of the Federal Register approved this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Each applicable ASTM standard is incorporated as it exists on the date of the approval, and a notice of any change in it will be published in the Federal Register. You may obtain copies from the ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428. A copy of the ASTM standards is available for inspection at the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Administrative Record, Room 101, 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* ( a ) ( 1 ) Calculate the excess moisture percentage using one of these equations:
( 2 ) EM equals excess moisture percentage. TM equals total as-shipped moisture percentage calculated according to Table 1 of this section. IM equals inherent moisture percentage calculated according to Tables 2 and 3 of this section.
( b ) Multiply the excess moisture percentage by the tonnage from the bona fide sales, transfers of ownership, or uses by the operator during the quarter.
[62 FR 60146, Nov. 6, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 60276, Sept. 29, 2010]
§ 150.15 Assignments of error and briefs. ( a ) *General provisions.* Appellate counsel for the accused may file an assignment of error if any are to be alleged, setting forth separately each error asserted. The assignment of errors should be included in a brief for the accused in the format set forth in Appendix B to this part. An original of all assignments of error and briefs, and as many additional copies as shall be prescribed by the Court, shall be submitted. Briefs and assignments of errors shall be typed or printed, double-spaced on white paper, and securely fastened at the top. All references to matters contained in the record shall show record page numbers and any exhibit designations. A brief on behalf of the government shall be of like character as that prescribed for the accused.
( b ) *Time for filing and number of briefs.* Any brief for an accused shall be filed within 60 days after appellate counsel has been notified of the receipt of the record in the Office of the Judge Advocate General. If the Judge Advocate General has directed appellate government counsel to represent the United States, such counsel shall file an answer on behalf of the government within 30 days after any brief and assignment of errors has been filed on behalf of an accused. Appellate counsel for an accused may file a reply brief no later than 7 days after the filing of a response brief on behalf of the government. If no brief is filed on behalf of an accused, a brief on behalf of the government may be filed within 30 days after expiration of the time allowed for the filing of a brief on behalf of the accused.
( c ) *Appendix.* The brief of either party may include an appendix. If an unpublished opinion is cited in the brief, a copy shall be attached in an appendix. The appendix may also include extracts of statutes, rules, or regulations. A motion must be filed under § 150.23, *infra,* to attach any other matter.
# C_2023141EN.01000401.xml

| 24.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/4

---

Special report 09/2023

‘Securing agricultural product supply chains during COVID-19 – EU response was rapid, but insufficiently targeted by member states’

(2023/C 141/04)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 09/2023: ‘Securing agricultural product supply chains during COVID-19 – EU response was rapid, but insufficiently targeted by member states’.

The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=63733

---
# C_2008209EN.01006801.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/68

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2008 — Dalmasso v Commission

(Case F-61/05) (1)

1

(Staff case - Contract staff - Recruitment - Grading in function group - Application for review of grade and remuneration set on recruitment - Former auxiliary staff member employed as contract staff member - Article 3a and Article 80(2) and (3) of the CEOS - Duties falling under different function groups - Equal treatment - Action unfounded)

(2008/C 209/122)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Raffaelle Dalmasso (Schaerbeek, Belgium) (represented by: L.Vogel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by M. Arpio Santacruz and I. Sulce, agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Staff case — First, annulment of the Commission's decision rejecting the complaint submitted by the applicant, a former member of the auxiliary staff, against the decision fixing his grade and remuneration as a contract staff member and, secondly, an application for damages (formerly T-269/05)

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 229 of 17.9.2005, p. 30 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities as T-269/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal by order dated 15.12.2005).

1

---
### §3349b. Holdover provisions

Sections 3345 through 3349a shall not be construed to affect any statute that authorizes a person to continue to serve in any office—

(1) after the expiration of the term for which such person is appointed; and

(2) until a successor is appointed or a specified period of time has expired.

(Added Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title I, §151(b), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–615.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 30 days after Oct. 21, 1998, and applicable to any office that becomes vacant after such effective date, with certain exceptions, see section 151(d) of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as a note under section 3345 of this title.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RASHAD COLEMAN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3982

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed August 15, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; Mary M. Handsel, Judge. 

Rashad Coleman, pro se.

 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Map 3-33: Lands with

Wilderness Characteristics

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundaries

Lands with Wilderness Characteristics

BLM & USFS Surface Management

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
Exhibit 4.8

                                 THIRD AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                       SENA 401(k) PLAN FOR UNION MEMBERS
               (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2001)

         WHEREAS, Stora Enso North America, Corp. ("SENA") as sponsor of the
SENA 401(k) Plan for Union Members (As Amended and Restated Effective as of
January 1, 2001) (the "plan"), desires to amend the plan in accordance with the
powers granted to it under subsection 9.1 of the plan and acting pursuant to the
authority granted by resolution of the Board of Directors of SENA.

          NOW THEREFORE, the plan is amended in the following respects effective
January 1, 2003:

          1.   Section 4.5 of the plan is hereby amended by deleting the last
               sentence thereof and replacing it with the following:

"If no election has been made by a participant, 100 percent of his income
deferral contributions will be invested in the default investment fund. The
choice of default investment fund is at the designation of the Board."

          2.   Section 5.2 of the plan is hereby amended by adding the following
               paragraph to the end:

          "For the five day period immediately preceding each annual meeting of
SENA's parent company, Stora Enso Oyj, there may be a blackout period with
respect to the ADSs held by the plan in the SEO Unitized Stock Fund. During this
period, the ability of all participants and beneficiaries under the plan to
direct the ADSs in their accounts or to receive distributions of ADSs in their
accounts will be suspended."

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SENA has caused this Third Amendment to the plan
to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officers this 1st day of
May, 2003.

                                                  STORA ENSO NORTH AMERICA CORP.


                                                  By: /s/ Gary A. Parafinczuk
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Gary A. Parafinczuk
                                                  Its: SVP Human Resources
ATTEST:

By: /s/ Carl H. Wartman
   --------------------------
     Carl H. Wartman
Its: SVP Legal, Purchasing & Forest Resources

                                      * * *
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>            DEC-31-1995

<CASH>                         21,456,552 
<SECURITIES>                         0    
<RECEIVABLES>                   3,703,273 
<ALLOWANCES>                         0    
<INVENTORY>                          0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               25,159,825 
<PP&E>                        189,130,405 
<DEPRECIATION>                 52,390,756 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                178,508,742 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,318,265 
<BONDS>                        88,670,160 
<COMMON>                             0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0    
<PREFERRED>                          0    
<OTHER-SE>                     63,986,674 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  178,508,742 
<SALES>                        32,608,714 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               33,940,506 
<CGS>                                0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  19,463,881 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                6,261,705 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              8,991,027 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (776,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (1,635,175)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0    
<CHANGES>                            0    
<NET-INCOME>                   (1,635,175)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (9.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (9.15)

        


</TABLE>
Letter from Bank of Scotland



  
 Exhibit 10.35.2 
  
 [LOGO]    BANK OF SCOTLAND 
 
	             CORPORATE
BANKING
 	 	 Corporate Banking (Scotland)
 
	  	 	 4th
Floor
 
	  	 	 New Uberior House
 
	  	 	 11 Earl Grey Street
 
	  	 	 Edinburgh
 
	  	 	 EH3 9BN
 
	  	 	  
	 Strictly Private & Confidential
 	 	 Telephone: Direct Line:       0131-659-0717
 
	 Vernon Brannon, Senior Vice President
 	 	 Switchboard:    0131-442-7777
 
	 HLM Design Inc
 	 	 Fax:                  0131-669-0760
 
	 Suite 2950
 	 	  
	 121 West Trade Street
 	 	 Email:         chris_solley@bankofscotland.co.uk
 
	 Charlotte, NC 28202-5399
 	 	  
	 USA
 	 	 Our Ref:    CORP/CS
 
	  	 	  
	  	 	 Your Ref:
 
	  	 	  
	  	 	 13 December 2002
 

 
  
 Dear Vernon, 
  
 Re:    Term Loan dated 15th February 2002 (“the Term Loan”) between G A Design International (Holdings) Limited (“Borrower”) and Bank of Scotland (“BoS”) 
  

With reference to schedule 4 (Financial Covenants) of the Term Loan agreement. The purpose of this letter is to confirm that BoS is in the process of reviewing the current suite of covenants
prior to 31st January 2003, and in the meantime, BoS will waive the Borrowers obligation to comply with
the Gearing (clause 1.1), Trade Debtor Cover (1.2) and Consolidated Interest Cover (1.6) covenant tests, as at 31st October 2002. 
  
 This waiver is for a period of one year and a day and only applies to the financial covenants
and test date noted above, and is provided on the basis that, following receipt of the necessary financial information requested, the Borrower and BoS agree a revised suite of covenants prior to the 31st December 2002 test. 
  
 All other
rights are reserved under the facility letter as noted above. 
  
 I trust that this is in order. 
  
 Kind regards 
  
  
 Yours sincerely 
  
 /s/    Chris Solley 
 Chris Solley 
 Corporate Banking Manager
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Universal Detection Technology (the "Registrant") for the year ending December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jacques Tizabi, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date: April 8, 2016  By: /s/ Jacques Tizabi Jacques Tizabi, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                              GENICOM CORPORATION
                               STOCK OPTION PLAN

         AMENDMENT  to Genicom Corporation Stock Option Plan (the "Plan")
adopted by the Board of Directors of Genicom Corporation (the "Company") at a
meeting on February 13, 1995:


Section 6(d) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

In the event an Optionee shall cease to be employed by any Genicom Group
Company on a full-time basis for any reason other than as a result of his death
or "disability" (within the meaning of Section 105(d)(4) of the 1954 Code or
the 1986 Code, whichever is applicable), the unexercised portion of any Option
held by such Optionee at that time may only be exercised within one month, or
such other period greater than one month determined by the Board of Directors
(or the Committee), after the date on which the Optionee ceased to be so
employed, and only to the extent that his right to exercised such portion had
vested as of the date on which he ceased to be so employed.
Follow-up to your question

robert.j.morehouse to: Nick Parsons 02/17/2011 11:25 AM

Nick:

As a follow-up to your question, the RTO capacity at the existing Baton

Rouge Halobutyl unit is: 23340 scfm (design basis)

Bob Morehouse

ExxonMobil

Office: 281-870-6524; Cell: 281-384-5390

robert.j.morehouse@exxonmobil.com
Clinical Guide > Comorbidities and Complications

# Guide for HIV/AIDS Clinical CareSection 6: Comorbidities, Coinfections, and Complications- Abnormalities of Body-Fat Distribution
- Dyslipidemia
- Insulin Resistance, Hyperglycemia, and Diabetes on Antiretroviral Therapy
- Coronary Heart Disease Risk
- Renal Disease
- Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome
- Anal Dysplasia
- Candidiasis, Oral and Esophageal
- Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal
- Cervical Dysplasia
- Cryptococcal Disease
- Cryptosporidiosis
- Cytomegalovirus Disease
- Gonorrhea and Chlamydia
- Hepatitis B Infection
- Hepatitis C Infection
- Herpes Simplex, Mucocutaneous
- Herpes Zoster/Shingles
- Histoplasmosis
- Kaposi Sarcoma
- Molluscum Contagiosum
- *Mycobacterium avium* Complex
- *Mycobacterium tuberculosis*
- Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
- Pneumocystis Pneumonia
- Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy
- Seborrheic Dermatitis
- Sinusitis
- Syphilis
- Toxoplasmosis
#### Adler Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v County Holding Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, defendant County Holding Corp. appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 3, 1978, as denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 1) to dismiss the complaint on the ground of documentary evidence. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The instant motion having been *790made prior to the joinder of issue, it was not, as appellant appears to assume, a motion for summary judgment, nor was it converted into such a motion by the court pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [c]) (see, also, *Rovello v Oroñno Realty Co.,*40 NY2d 633). On the merits of appellant’s motion to dismiss, the documentary evidence submitted (a copy of the lease between it and its lessee) is not necessarily dispositive on the issue of the implied consent of the owner, as the agreement merely provides that "The Landlord’s permission to make alterations * * * or improvements shall not be construed to be a consent of [the] Landlord to the right of mechanics’ liens by materialmen, mechanics, laborers or other persons upon or about the demised premises, the entire liability therefor being assumed by the Tenant.” Assuming, *arguendo,*that this language is binding upon the plaintiff lienor, other factors giving rise to an implied consent are not precluded thereby. Whether the present action could withstand a motion for summary judgment is a separate question, not. properly before us at this juncture. Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1086 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1086

Expressing support for the designation of March 19, 2024, as ``National 
Agriculture Day'' and celebrating the importance of agriculture as one 
         of the most impactful industries in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2024

  Mr. Alford (for himself, Mr. Costa, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Davis of North 
Carolina, Mr. Mann, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Newhouse, 
Ms. Budzinski, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Finstad, Mr. Posey, Mrs. Cammack, Mr. 
   Luetkemeyer, Mr. Soto, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mrs. 
   Chavez-DeRemer, Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida, Mr. Feenstra, Mr. 
 Thompson of Pennsylvania, Ms. Salinas, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Flood, Mr. Van 
 Orden, Mr. Westerman, Ms. Davids of Kansas, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, 
 Ms. Perez, Mr. Duarte, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Langworthy, Mr. Sorensen, 
  Mr. Smith of Missouri, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. Webster of 
 Florida, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Bost, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. 
   Nunn of Iowa, Mr. Curtis, Mr. Kean of New Jersey, Mrs. Hayes, Mr. 
    Lucas, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Baird, Ms. Craig, Mrs. 
Fischbach, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Miller of Ohio, Mr. Huizenga, 
 Mr. Steil, Ms. Caraveo, Mr. Armstrong, Mrs. Hinson, Mr. LaTurner, Mr. 
 Rouzer, Mr. Rose, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Kustoff, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. Steube, 
 Ms. Tokuda, and Mrs. Harshbarger) submitted the following resolution; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of March 19, 2024, as ``National 
Agriculture Day'' and celebrating the importance of agriculture as one 
         of the most impactful industries in the United States.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses support for the designation of ``National 
        Agriculture Day''; and
            (2) celebrates the importance of agriculture as one of the 
        most impactful industries in the United States.
                                 <all>
```