alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 8, 2006

|MS Structured Asset Corp.                         
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

|Delaware                                        | 333-101155                | 13-4026700                        
|----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                                               
|(State or Other Jurisdiction  of Incorporation) | (Commission File  Number) | (IRS Employer  Identification No.)



|1585 Broadway, Second Floor  New York, New York  Attention: Madhu Philips | 10036     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------
|                                                                         
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                                  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

|Not Applicable                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





---









Section 8Other Events



| | Item 8.01 | Other Events
| | --------- | ------------



Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS), AT&T Corp. Debenture Backed Series 2004-7 Trust (the Trust) (New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol HJM) has liquidated its assets and terminated.  Settlement of a sale of the securities held by the Trust occurred on February 8, 2006, and a liquidation distribution was made with respect to the Units of the Trust on February 8, 2006.



In respect of the Class A Units, the amount of the distribution was $25.444 per Class A Unit, representing the full Unit Principal Balance of the Class A Units plus accrued interest in respect of the Class A Units through and excluding February 8, 2006.



In respect of the Class B Units, the amount of the distribution was $834.292 per $1,000 Initial Notional Amortizing Balance of Class B Units, representing the full Class B Present Value Amount as determined for value on February 8, 2006.





| |  | 
| |  | 





---











SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.



Date: February 14, 2006

MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.

(Registrant)

By: /s/ Madhu Philips

Name:    Madhu Philips
  Title:     Vice President





| |  | 
| |  | 





---
# CI2023070EN.01000501.xml

| 27.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 70/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 70/5

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decisions (CFSP) 2023/432, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/429 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2023/C 70 I/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/432 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/429 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address, before 1 June 2023:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 59 I, 25.2.2023, p. 437.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 59 I, 25.2.2023, p. 278.

---
# C_2008183EN.01003001.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/30

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 23 May 2008 — FagorBrandt v Commission

(Case T-273/04) (1)

1

(2008/C 183/56)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 9.10.2004.

1

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.3

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steven G. Larson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LaserCard Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

        (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

        (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2004

/s/ Steven G. Larson
--------------------
Steven G. Larson
Chief Financial Officer


                                       39
California Home ARB: Home Search Site Map Software ContactUs AQD: Home



### Select 8 Summary FAQs PM2.5 PM10 Natl Annual Std Design Value National 24-Hour Design Value High National 24-Hour Average Monitoring Sites 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 Eastern Kern 8-Hour Ozone Planning Area Kern County Canebrake * * * * 38.6 43.3 Mojave-923 Poole Street * 7.2 * 24 * 120.2

Notes: PM10 statistics may include data that are related to an exceptional event

. * There was insufficient (or no) data available to dete rmine the value. Go to: Data Statistics Home Page Select 8 Summary Start Pag e
#### § 941.795 Small operator assistance.

Part 795 of this chapter, *Small Operator Assistance,* shall apply to any person making application for assistance under the small operator assistance program.
#### § 910.845 Civil penalties.

Part 845 of this chapter, *Civil Penalties,* shall apply when civil penalties are assessed for violations on surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
### §3597. Reemployment following limited appointment in the Foreign Service

An employee of any agency who accepts, with the consent of the head of that agency, a limited appointment in the Foreign Service under section 309 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 is entitled, upon the expiration of that appointment, to be reemployed in that employee's former position or in a corresponding or higher position in that agency. Upon reemployment under this section, an employee shall be entitled to any within-grade increases in pay which the employee would have received if the employee had remained in the former position in the agency.

(Added Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2301(a), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2164.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 309 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980, referred to in text, is classified to section 3949 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as a note under section 3901 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
### §306108. Effect of undertaking on historic property

The head of any Federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed Federal or federally assisted undertaking in any State and the head of any Federal department or independent agency having authority to license any undertaking, prior to the approval of the expenditure of any Federal funds on the undertaking or prior to the issuance of any license, shall take into account the effect of the undertaking on any historic property. The head of the Federal agency shall afford the Council a reasonable opportunity to comment with regard to the undertaking.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3227.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 306108 | 16 U.S.C. 470f. | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §106, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 917; Pub. L. 94–422, title II, §201(3), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1320. |

Section

The words "historic property" are substituted for "district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register" because of the definition of "historic property" in section 300308 of the new title.
### §100701. Protection, interpretation, and research in System

Recognizing the ever increasing societal pressures being placed upon America's unique natural and cultural resources contained in the System, the Secretary shall continually improve the ability of the Service to provide state-of-the-art management, protection, and interpretation of, and research on, the resources of the System.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3105.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 100701 | 16 U.S.C. 5911. | Pub. L. 105–391, title I, §101, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3498. |

Section
#### John Weber, Respondent, *v.*John Ebling, Appellant.

April 10, 1876.

1. Ebling and Able are not *idem sonans,*and it is error to admit evidence of a judgment against John Able in a proceeding to revive a judgment against John Ebling.

*'2.*A judgment cannot be revived against E. by showing that judgment was rendered against him under the name of A.; but, if he has knowingly allowed judgment to be rendered against him by the name of A., an. execution on that judgment can be made effectual against any property he may have subject to execution.

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

*Reversed and remanded.*

*Gottschalh,*for. appellant.

*16
      *Francis Garvey,*for respondent,

cited: Stone *v.*Powell, 5 Mo. 435 ; Wag. Stat, 831, sec. 10.

Bakewell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding to revive a judgment rendered on October 8, 1863, before a justice of the peace.

On the trial plaintiff ivas allowed, against the objection of defendant, to introduce in evidence the docket of the justice showing a judgment against John Able, and also to introduce evidence tending to prove that the John Ebling, defendant in the present proceeding, and the John Able,, against whom the original judgment had been obtained, are the same man.

There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and the-cause is brought here by appeal.

Beyond all controversy, the names, John Ebling and John Able, are not *idem sonans;*and it is difficult to see-how entering a judgment against John Ebling can be the revival of a judgment against John Able. The statute-authorizes the justice, in this proceeding, to make an entry reviving the judgment already upon his docket; it gives, him no power to change the original judgment or to correct any mistake as to name or amount. If the original judgment was against John Able, the judgment must be revived against John Able, and cannot be revived against John Smith by showing that judgment was got against Smith by the name of Able. There is no hardship in this.

It is too late now to correct a mistake in the original judgment; but that judgment, on proper notice to the defendant and compliance with the statute, can be revived as it stands. If, in fact, the defendant has gone by the-name of Able, or has knowingly allowed judgment to be-rendered against him by that name, an execution on that judgment can be made effectual against any property subject to execution that he may have.

If the name Ebling cannot be thus connected- with the person of defendant, plaintiff may, perhaps, have: *17another remedy. Be that as it may, the courts cannot, in a proceeding to revive a judgment, relieve against the consequences of a mistake of name in the judgment itself.

The Circuit Court erred in admitting evidence of a judgment against John Ebling, in a proceeding to revive a judgment against John Able. The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

The other judges concur.
Editorial Note on Part 780
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54949, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 780 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 780.37 Road systems. ( a ) *Plans and drawings.* Each applicant for a surface coal mining and reclamation permit shall submit plans and drawings for each road, as defined in § 701.5 of this chapter, to be constructed, used, or maintained within the proposed permit area. The plans and drawings shall— ( 1 ) Include a map, appropriate cross sections, design drawings and specifications for road widths, gradients, surfacing materials, cuts, fill embankments, culverts, bridges, drainage ditches, low-water crossings, and drainage structures;
( 2 ) Contain the drawings and specifications of each proposed road that is located in the channel of an intermittent or perennial stream, as necessary for approval of the road by the regulatory authority in accordance with § 816.150(d)(1) of this chapter;
( 3 ) Contain the drawings and specifications for each proposed ford of perennial or intermittent streams that is used as a temporary route, as necessary for approval of the ford by the regulatory authority in accordance with § 816.151(c)(2) of this chapter;
( 4 ) Contain a description of measures to be taken to obtain approval of the regulatory authority for alteration or relocation of a natural stream channel under § 816.151(d)(5) of this chapter;
( 5 ) Contain the drawings and specifications for each low-water crossing of perennial or intermittent stream channels so that the regulatory authority can maximize the protection of the stream in accordance with § 816.151(d)(6) of this chapter; and
( 6 ) Describe the plans to remove and reclaim each road that would not be retained under an approved postmining land use, and the schedule for this removal and reclamation.
( b ) *Primary road certification.* The plans and drawings for each primary road shall be prepared by, or under the direction of, and certified by a qualified registered professional engineer, or in any State which authorizes land surveyors to certify the design of primary roads a qualified registered professional land surveyor, with experience in the design and construction of roads, as meeting the requirements of this chapter; current, prudent engineering practices; and any design criteria established by the regulatory authority.
( c ) *Standard design plans.* The regulatory authority may establish engineering design standards for primary roads through the State program approval process, in lieu of engineering tests, to establish compliance with the minimum static safety factor of 1.3 for all embankments specified in § 816.151(b) of this chapter.
[53 FR 45211, Nov. 8, 1988, as amended at 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54949, Nov. 17, 2017]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1037 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1037

   Providing the sense of the House of Representatives that in vitro 
    fertilization (IVF) is necessary for women who cannot conceive 
                   naturally, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 29, 2024

   Mrs. Chavez-DeRemer (for herself, Mrs. Steel, and Mr. Ciscomani) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                         on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing the sense of the House of Representatives that in vitro 
    fertilization (IVF) is necessary for women who cannot conceive 
                   naturally, and for other purposes.

Whereas, infertility presents a significant challenge for women across the 
        nation, affecting their ability to conceive and realize their 
        aspirations of parenthood;
Whereas, CDC reports that roughly 19 percent of women deal with infertility;
Whereas, advancements in medical science have led to the emergence of in vitro 
        fertilization (IVF), providing hope and options for those grappling with 
        infertility;
Whereas, IVF has proven to be a widely embraced and effective solution for 
        couples contending with infertility, affording them the opportunity to 
        establish families and experience the blessings of parenthood; and
Whereas, the Columbia University Fertility Center reports over 8 million babies 
        have been born through IVF: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) strongly supports the access to and use of IVF 
        treatments across the United States;
            (2) remains committed to commonsense policies that enable 4 
        families to grow and thrive; and
            (3) recognizes the fundamental truth that life is precious.
                                 <all>
```
### §200301. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) Fund.—The term "Fund" means the Land and Water Conservation Fund established under section 200302 of this title.

(2) State.—The term "State" means a State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3171.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 200301(1) | no source. | |
| 200301(2) | 16 U.S.C. 460l–8(b)(5) (last sentence). | Pub. L. 88–578, title I, §6(b)(5) (last sentence), formerly §5, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 900; renumbered §6, Pub. L. 92–347, §2, July 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 459; Pub. L. 94–422, title I, §101(3), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1315. |

Section
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                          35,476
<SECURITIES>                                     4,119
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,248
<INVENTORY>                                      4,964
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,949
<PP&E>                                         398,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                 253,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,463
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           245
<OTHER-SE>                                     364,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586,688
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,742
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,890
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,411
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,539
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,539
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>