alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
700

700

650

600

57

57

G R A V E L P IT R D

C O U N T Y H W Y-P

E D G E W A T E R B E A C H R D

R O P S O N R D

C O U N T Y H W Y-R D

S

S T U R G E O N B AY R D

B AY S H O R E PA R K D R

57

57

G R A V E L P IT R D

C O U N T Y H W Y-P

E D G E W A T E R B E A C H R D

R O P S O N R D

C O U N T Y H W Y-R D

S

S T U R G E O N B AY R D

B AY S H O R E PA R K D R

Gilson

Creek

G R E E N B A Y

L A K E M I C H I G A N

Edgewater

Beach

Dyckesville

Edgewater

Beach

Wellers

Dock

Barretts

Point Barretts

Point

Saint Louis

Catholic

Cemetery

Little

Tail

Point

Namur

Green

Bay East

Little

Sturgeon SW

Luxemburg

Pensaukee Oconto SE

Dyckesville

New

Franken

87°

30"

50'

45'

37'

40'

4 44°

32

38 39

33

000

44

44

49

4

49

000m

30" 2

49

49

49

32

340

4 4 000

49

52

49

40

37

51

47'30"

47'

49

49

4

55

45

42'

45'

000

39

550

30"

45'

50'

FEET 44°

44°

30"

49

4

49

49

52'

2

300

54

51

FEET

49

530 4 4

33 36

49

4

N

E

N

E

4

4

49

49

49

87°

48

46

46

45

000m

44°

4

4

49

4

35

30"

42

50

FEET

53

42

31 38

49

49

42'

FEET

000m

50

52

49

49

49

49

34

55

49

31

87°

37'

45'

87°52'

30"

30"

49

4

4 000

49

4

000m

37

48

53

43

36

35

47

54

40'

49

4

49

47

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

DYCKESVILLE, WI

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

DYCKESVILLE QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 16T

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, July 2008

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 34 ́

10 MILS

3° 55 ́

70 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

16T

DQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
### SUBCHAPTER I—EMPLOYMENT AUTHORITIES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–54, §2(a)(10), Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 381, added heading for subchapter I.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Milton Strecker, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County-Court, Kings County, dated March 14, 1960, denying without a hearing his *coram nobis*application to vacate a judgment of said court rendered May 2, 1952, convicting him, on his plea of guilty, of the crime of burglary in the third degree and sentencing him to serve a term of 2% to 5 years. Order affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                       1,803,052
<SECURITIES>                                   550,318
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,857,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                   227,494
<INVENTORY>                                  1,497,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,858,160
<PP&E>                                       4,866,710
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,784,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,230,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,899,015
<BONDS>                                        743,489
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,000
<COMMON>                                       157,219
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,253,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,230,246
<SALES>                                      1,582,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,960,315
<CGS>                                        1,019,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,969,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               972,544
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,452
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### § 150.9 Conduct of counsel.

The conduct of counsel appearing before the Court shall be in accordance with rules of conduct prescribed pursuant to Rule for Courts-Martial 109 by the Judge Advocate General of the service concerned. However, the Court may exercise its inherent power to regulate counsel appearing before it, including the power to remove counsel from a particular case for misconduct in relation to that case. Conduct deemed by the Court to warrant consideration of suspension from practice or other professional discipline shall be reported by the Court to the Judge Advocate General concerned.
#### § 933.784 Underground mining permit applications—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan.

Part 784 of this chapter, *Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct underground coal mining except that for the purposes of part 933, the paragraph in § 784.17 shall be replaced by the following two paragraphs:

(a) For any public parks, forest, or recreation areas, or historic places that may be adversely affected by the proposed operation, each plan shall describe the measures to be used to minimize or prevent these impacts and to obtain approval of the regulatory authority and other agencies as required in 30 CFR 761.12(f).

(b) Each application for an operation which will be visible from any public park, public highway, or residential area shall include measures to be taken to screen the operation from the view of public parks, public highways and residential areas, or shall set forth the reasons why such screening measures are either not feasible or not desirable.
NO. 07-06-0172-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A SEPTEMBER 8, 2006

______________________________ IN THE INTEREST O F K.C.B., A C HILD

_________________________________ FROM THE 1 00TH DI STRICT COURT OF CO LLINGS W ORTH COUNT Y;

NO. 6951; HON ORABLE PHIL VAN DERPOOL, JU DGE

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION By order dated M arch 31, 2006, the trial cour t ter minated the parental rights o f appellant

Angela Mel ton. Pursuant to s ection 201.015 of the Texas Famil y Code (Ve rnon 2002), on April 3, 2006, Melton filed a no tice of appeal to the referring court req uesting de novo review . The Texas Depar tment of Familyand Protective Servic es responded w ith a motion to strike the notice of appeal for d e novo rev iew. A hearing was set on the matter. Meanwhil e, Melton filed a notice of appeal w ith the trial court cler k express ing an intent to2

appeal the termina tion order to this Cour

t. Follow ing the heari ng, on June 19, 2006, the trial cour t granted M elton’s notice of appeal for de novo review to the referri ng court. Pending befo re this Cour t is Melton ’s motion to di smiss the appeal filed here as premature. She asserts ther e is no final j udgment from whi ch to appeal. See generally , Key Western Life Ins. Co. v . State Bd. of Ins., 163 Tex. 11, 350 S.W.2d 839, 846 (1961) (holding that de novo r

eview is not an appeal, butan independent actio n). See also Lamar County Appraisal Dist. v . Campbell Soup C o., 93 S.W.3d 642, 645 (Tex.App.–Texar kana 2002, no pet.) (noti ng that t rial de novo is a new trial on the entire case and cures all procedural defects

in the proceedi ngs below ).
We agree with Melton that there is no final judgment and grant themotion to dismiss the appeal. Hav ing dismis sed the appeal at M elton’s req uest, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate wi ll issue fort hwith.
Don H. Reavis Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>              1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               4,441
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (590)
<INVENTORY>                                         11,069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    26,216
<PP&E>                                              16,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (8,276)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      34,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               13,220
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 7
<OTHER-SE>                                          13,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        34,478
<SALES>                                             22,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    22,226
<CGS>                                               16,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       16,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    14,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (7,977)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (8,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (8,311)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (1.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.18)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 1350 Certificationof the**

**Chief Financial Officer**

 

I,Michael Smith, the chief financial officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation,certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CobraElectronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009(the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporationand its subsidiaries.

 

 
|   | /s/  Michael Smith      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Michael  Smith          |
|   | November 12,  2009 |

 

----
### §4138. Certain awards prohibited

No award shall be made under this subchapter to or for the benefit of (1) any person who has been convicted of a violation of any provision of chapter 115, title 18, or of any other crime involving disloyalty to the United States, or (2) any claimant whose claim under this subchapter is within the scope of title III of the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, as amended (69 Stat. 570) [22 U.S.C. 1641 et seq.], except any claimant whose award under section 303(1) of title III of the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, as amended [22 U.S.C. 1641b(1)], is recertified pursuant to subsection (b) of section 4139 of this title.

(July 3, 1948, ch. 826, title II, §208, as added Pub. L. 87–846, title I, §103, Oct. 22, 1962, 76 Stat. 1110.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, referred to in text, is act Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, 64 Stat. 12. Title III of the Act is classified generally to subchapter III (§1641 et seq.) of chapter 21 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1621 of Title 22 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 2017g of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                          1,544
<SECURITIES>                    19,553
<RECEIVABLES>                   750,000
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                771,097
<PP&E>                          2,700,000
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3,471,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,886,888
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        2,899
<OTHER-SE>                      (418,190)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,471,597
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                5,345
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                218,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (213,554)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (290,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (503,554)
<DISCONTINUED>                  (495,592)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (999,146)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.04)



</TABLE>
§ 47.82 Disclosure of information to MSHA. ( a ) Even if the operator has a trade secret claim, the operator must disclose to MSHA, upon request, any information which this subpart requires the operator to make available.
( b ) The operator must make a trade secret claim, no later than at the time the information is provided to MSHA, so that MSHA can determine the trade secret status and implement the necessary protection.
### Geophysical interpretation of the gneiss terrane of northern Washington and southern British Columbia, and its implications for uranium exploration

By: John W. CadyKenneth F. Fox

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1260

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1039 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1039

  Recognizing the significance of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and the 
   need for robust funding of the National Institute of Neurological 
       Disorders and Stroke at the National Institutes of Health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 29, 2024

  Mr. Gottheimer (for himself and Mr. Bacon) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the significance of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and the 
   need for robust funding of the National Institute of Neurological 
       Disorders and Stroke at the National Institutes of Health.

Whereas Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) causes damage to the peripheral 
        nerves, which transmit information and signals from the brain and spinal 
        cord to the rest of the body, and can also directly affect the nerves 
        that control the muscles;
Whereas it is estimated that 126,000 individuals in the United States have CMT 
        and 2,600,000 people worldwide;
Whereas nearly all cases of CMT are inherited;
Whereas the specific gene that causes CMT has not yet been identified;
Whereas there are many different types of CMT, including CMT4B3; and
Whereas, despite its impact, Federal funding for CMT research was actually less 
        in 2022 than in 2021: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes that Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease is a 
        significant disease impacting thousands of Americans and 
        millions around the world;
            (2) expresses that Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease should 
        receive robust funding for research to ensure all is being done 
        to study this disease at the National Institute of Neurological 
        Disorders and Stroke within the National Institutes of Health; 
        and
            (3) expresses the need to continue to invest in research 
        efforts to tackle Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and other rare 
        diseases that currently have no cure.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 816
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 816 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 816.64 Use of explosives: Blasting schedule. ( a ) *General requirements.* ( 1 ) The operator shall conduct blasting operations at times approved by the regulatory authority and announced in the blasting schedule. The regulatory authority may limit the area covered, timing, and sequence of blasting as listed in the schedule, if such limitations are necessary and reasonable in order to protect the public health and safety or welfare.
( 2 ) All blasting shall be conducted between sunrise and sunset, unless nighttime blasting is approved by the regulatory authority based upon a showing by the operator that the public will be protected from adverse noise and other impacts. The regulatory authority may specify more restrictive time periods for blasting.
( 3 ) Unscheduled blasts may be conducted only where public or operator health and safety so require and for emergency blasting actions. When an operator conducts an unscheduled blast, the operator, using audible signals, shall notify residents within 1 ⁄ 2 mile of the blasting site and document the reason for the unscheduled blast in accordance with § 816.68(p).
( b ) *Blasting schedule publication and distribution.* ( 1 ) The operator shall publish the blasting schedule in a newspaper of general circulation in the locality of the blasting site at least 10 days, but not more than 30 days, before beginning a blasting program.
( 2 ) The operator shall distribute copies of the schedule to local governments and public utilities and to each local residence within 1 ⁄ 2 mile of the proposed blasting site described in the schedule.
( 3 ) The operator shall republish and redistribute the schedule at least every 12 months and revise and republish the schedule at least 10 days, but not more than 30 days, before blasting whenever the area covered by the schedule changes or actual time periods for blasting significantly differ from the prior announcement.
( c ) *Blasting schedule contents.* The blasting schedule shall contain, at a minimum— ( 1 ) Name, address, and telephone number of operator;
( 2 ) Identification of the specific areas in which blasting will take place;
( 3 ) Dates and time periods when explosives are to be detonated;
( 4 ) Methods to be used to control access to the blasting area; and
( 5 ) Type and patterns of audible warning and all-clear signals to be used before and after blasting.
[48 FR 9807, Mar. 8, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017]