# Seattle-Tacoma International Airport SMS Self-Inspection Program

Prepared For: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Airports Airport Safety and Operations Division Prepared By: Landry Consultants LLC, on behalf of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and Operations Senior Manager, Mark Coates Date: 11/25/2009SMS Self-Inspection Program Revision History Date Version Summary 11/15/09 v.0.1 Initial draft for SEA review 11/17/09 v.0.2 Review with Ramp Manager and revisions included. 11/19/09 v.0.3 Revisions included; new review 11/25/09 v.1.0 Final 

### Prepared in Support of Statement of Work Section C – Safety Assurance, Task 3 Develop a ramp and bagwell (if applicable) self-inspection program that ensures safety is maintained. While FAA currently does not regulate airport ramp areas, the increase in safetyrelated incidents in the ramp and bagwell areas on airports is disturbing. Selfinspection techniques required under Part 139 for movement areas may be useful to an airport to decrease the number of incidents in non-movement areas. Under this task, the airport will review Part 139 to determine if requirements for self-inspection in the movement areas would be useful for self-inspection in the non-movement areas including the ramp and bagwell (if applicable); develop maps of the non-movement area; create an audit checklist/self-inspection form for the given airport; create forms for reporting/documenting hazards and incidents/accidents; and, develop processes for reporting, tracking, and trending safety issues on the ramp and bagwell (if applicable).

Safety Assurance iSMS Self-Inspection Program

Safety Assurance ii 

## Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 2. Inspection Program Schedule ........................................................................ 2 3. Inspection Program Procedures .................................................................... 4 3.1 Preparation and Equipment .................................................................................... 4 3.2 Conducting Inspections - Purpose .......................................................................... 4 3.3 Conducting Inspections - Procedures ..................................................................... 5 3.3.1 Ramp and Cargo Areas ............................................................................... 5 3.3.2 Bagwell ........................................................................................................ 5 3.4 Inspection Hazard Reporting ................................................................................... 5 3.5 Post Inspection Procedures .................................................................................... 6 3.6 Tracking and Resolving Hazards ............................................................................ 6 

### 4. Inspection Checklist ....................................................................................... 7 5. Summary of Findings ................................................................................... 11 

## List of Tables Table 1 - Ramp/Cargo Inspection Schedule ......................................................... 2 Table 2 - Bagwell Inspection Schedule ................................................................. 3 

## List of Figures Figure 1 - Ramp and Cargo Area Map .................................................................. 3 Figure 2 - Bagwell Area Map ................................................................................ 3SMS Self-Inspection Program 

## 1. Introduction Under the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 139 (14 CFR Part 139), airports that obtain an Operating Certificate are required to perform regular (daily or more frequently) self inspections (139-327) of the airfield with a focus on the movement area including runways and taxiways. Many airports conduct additional inspections of the ramp or apron areas for concerns such as pavement conditions, lighting, markings, wildlife attractants, and foreign object debris (FOD). Currently at Sea-Tac inspections are conducted thrice daily, and findings are logged into an electronic application (Sea-Tac Inspector) by Airport Operations Specialists (AOSs), reviewed by Airport Duty Managers (ADMs), compiled, and approved daily. Hazards are recorded and routed to maintenance, or other appropriate resources for resolution in compliance with Part 139 regulations. Today no formal ramp inspections exist within Part 139 compliance. Airports and tenants typically agree to certain airport Rules and Regulations and Lease Agreements for ramp safety. In some cases airports operate common use gates at which a joint responsibility exists to maintain safety.At Sea-Tac the current ramp safety program includes daily sweeping, installation of SeaTac FOD cans, and routing of safety issues to operations and maintenance. For detailed information on the current and future FOD program, see the FOD Program Manual. It should be noted that the FOD program includes an inspection checklist assigned to individual ADMs by area. The FOD Coordinator role is filled by an ADM assigned to coordinate all FOD activities and will co-coordinate FOD issues with the FOD Sub Committee chaired by an airline representative. While FOD is considered a separate program, opportunities exist to share responsibilities with the proposed ramp, cargo, and bagwell self-inspection program. Additional ramp and bagwell inspections are conducted by the Sea-Tac Fire department to ensure fire hydrants, fire extinguishers, and fueling operations are in compliance with both fire and Part 139 oversight. Recently Sea-Tac has begun the process of requiring all Ground Service Providers (GSPs) to participate in the IATA Safety Audit for Ground Operations (ISAGO) program as a measure to improve safety on the ramp. This requirement has been added to GSP License Agreements which are renewed on an annual basis. While Sea-Tac anticipates that the ISAGO implementation will improve safety on the ramp, it is a compliance program and does not require that Sea-Tac conduct inspections as part of the program. In February of 2009, Sea-Tac requested the participation of the Regional Office of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Runway Safety Action Team (RSAT) to assist in developing a comprehensive ramp safety checklist and inspection process. The RSAT and Sea-Tac Ramp Manager jointly conducted a 2-hour inspection of the ramp and taxi lane areas using a draft checklist. The checklist has since been modified to include additional elements. See Section 4 for reference to the checklist. The inspection resulted in a number of findings and recommendations which were reported to Sea-Tac management. Based on the success and important findings of the RSAT event, Sea-Tac plans, as part of the SMS, to perform ramp inspections on a scheduled and formal basis. The Safety Assurance 1SMS Self-Inspection Program inspections will be conducted by the AOSs (or equivalent staff) daily by area (see Figure1 Ramp and Cargo Area Map) on a rotating basis. Inspections will include bagwell walkthroughs as well (see Figure 2 – Bagwell Area Map). Additional inspections will occur during construction activities, weather events such as high wind or snow, and after ramp or bagwell accidents/incidents occur. AOSs (or equivalent staff) will be instructed to identify and collect safety information (hazards) through formal and hands on training. Staff will be trained to conduct inspections and to report findings in a consistent manner. See the SMS Training and Orientation Documentation for more information on staff training and Section 3.0 Inspection Program Procedures. As part of the formal communication plan, tenants will be alerted to the new SMS inspection program prior to the start. Tenant s will be asked to comment on the program and to commit to supporting the new safety initiative. 

## 2. Inspection Program Schedule The schedules on the following pages provide a comprehensive airfield-wide inspection program for ramp and cargo areas and include the bagwell. Each ramp, cargo, and bagwell area will be inspected at least once a week. Based on the size and complexity of the inspection durations are provided for daily planning. These inspections will be conducted independent of the Part 139 Movement Area daily inspections and may be combined with the FOD inspections as described in the FOD Program Manual.

Table 1 - Ramp/Cargo Inspection Schedule Areas (weeks 1 & 3) Day of Inspection Specific Locations Estimated Duration Shift (mid, day, swing) AOS or Equivalent Staff 1 Monday South Satellite NWA Hangar ASA Hangar 1 hour Mid As per scheduled
2 Tuesday Cargo 7 A& B Gates 1 hour Day As per scheduled 3 Wednesday C & D Gates 2 hours Swing As per scheduled 4 Thursday North Satellite Cargo 6 2 hours Mid As per scheduled 5 Friday Cargo 4 UAL Maintenance 1 hour Day As per scheduled 6 Saturday Cargo 1, 2, 3 1 hour Swing As per scheduled As Needed Sunday As Needed As Needed As Needed As per scheduled

Note : at least one inspection per month needs to be conducted during night time operations (hours of darkness). Inspections are conducted in v ehicles and on foot as necessary to capture all checklist items.

Safety Assurance 2SMS Self-Inspection Program

Safety Assurance 3 Figure 1 - Ramp and Cargo Area Map

Table 2 - Bagwell Inspection Schedule Areas Bagwell Areas (weeks 2 & 4) Day of Inspection Estimated Duration Shift (mid, day, swing) AOS or Equivalent Staff 1 Main Terminal North Monday 1.5 hours Mid As per scheduled 2 Main Terminal Mid Tuesday 1.5 hours Day As per scheduled 3 Main Terminal South Wednesday 1.5 hours Swing As per scheduled 4 North Satellite Thursday 1 hour Mid As per scheduled 5 South Satellite Friday 1 hour Day As per scheduled TBD As Needed Saturday As Needed As Needed As per scheduled TBD As Needed Sunday As Needed As Needed As per scheduled Note : Bagwell inspections are conducted on foot not in vehicles to ensure thoroughness.

Figure 2 - Bagwell Area MapSMS Self-Inspection Program 

## 3. Inspection Program Procedures To ensure a consistent level of quality control in all inspections, the following procedures have been designed and developed to guide staff conducting inspections. 

## 3.1 Preparation and Equipment Staff conducting inspections will be expected to compile necessary equipment prior to the event to ensure the most effective and efficient gathering of information. In the early stages of the inspection program a paper-based checklist will be used; eventually, as part of the Sea-Tac data system upgrades, an electronic version of the checklist will be integrated into the Sea-Tac Inspector application. 

### 3.1.1 Pre Electronic Checklist Process Prior to inspections, the following list of items will be collected:

• Checklist (ramp and bagwell depending on the scheduled activity – See Schedules in Section 2) • Clipboard for paper checklist • Camera • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including reflective safety vest and hearing protection. For the Bag Room gloves and safety glasses are recommended. Also, it is recommended staff wear steel toed foot wear for both types of inspections • Radio 

### 3.1.2 Electronic Checklist Process

• Laptop or handheld device with checklist (ramp and bagwell depending on the scheduled activity – See Schedules in Section 2) • Camera • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including safety vest and hearing protection. For the Bag Room gloves and safety glasses are recommended. Also, it is recommended that staff wear steel toed foot wear for both types of inspections • Radio 

## 3.2 Conducting Inspections - Purpose Inspections are considered critical to the success of the SMS and are part of the collaborative effort to ensure safety on the ramp and in the bagwell. The role of inspections in SMS for airports is to cont inuously review the environment in which staff and tenants operate. The intent of inspections is not to deliver punitive citations, but to indicate areas where hazards or hazardous behavior is present. The outcome and findings of the inspections are to alert tenants and staff to potential accidents and incidents and to jointly resolve the findings in a productive and corrective manner. However, if inspection findings do not result in changed actions or changes in activities, then appropriate citations and associated fines wi ll be delivered to the responsible party. Safety Assurance 4SMS Self-Inspection Program 

## 3.3 Conducting Inspections - Procedures While conducting inspections (ramp, cargo, and bagwell) using the paper-based checklists, staff will provide detailed information on the conditions for that particular inspection including weather, time (using a 24-hour method), and location. Ramp, cargo, and bagwell operations at Sea-Tac have both busy and slow periods relating to inbound and outbound flight schedules; strategically, inspections should be conducted at different times to ensure the most broad and thorough scope of findings. It is recommended that inspections be rotated by one of the three AOS shifts (See schedules in Section 2) to provide comprehensive monitoring. Depending on ramp, cargo, or bagwell inspections, staff will select the appropriate checklist and complete all areas listed. Staff are expected to conduct a thorough and detailed survey of the identified ramp, cargo or bagwell area and report any findings. 

### 3.3.1 Ramp and Cargo Areas Inspections of the ramp and cargo areas will be conducted by vehicle and by foot. Staff will perform the inspection beginning at one end of the designated area and thoroughly inspect all aspects of the gate or cargo areas including entrances to the bagwell. As part of the inspection, staff will make observations on facility and staff issues such as fire safety, proper PPE, Ground Service Equipment (GSE) chocked, parked, or stowed, and will also address issues such as speeding, sm oking, etc. If challenged by tenant staff or management, the AOS will provide a brief overview of the program and contact information. If tenants are interested in participating in the inspection, they will be allowed as long as they do not interfere with the assessment. 

### 3.3.2 Bagwell Inspections of the bagwell by areas will be conducted on foot. Staff will begin at one end of the designated area and will ensure that the entire facility will be inspected including stairwells and exits to the ramp. As part of the inspection, staff will make observations on facility and staff issues such as fire safety, proper PPE, Ground Service Equipment (GSE) chocked, parked, or stowed, and will also address issues such as speeding, smoking, etc. If challenged by tenant sta ff or management, the AOS will provide a brief overview of the program and contact information. If tenants are interested in participating in the inspection, they will be allowed as long as they do not interfere with the assessment. 

## 3.4 Inspection Hazard Reporting During ramp and bagwell inspections if a hazard is observed, staff will record the following information:

• Location – will include as much information as possible such as gate or carousel number • Responsible party for correction - this is typically tenant information such as airline, GSP, or in certain cases, the appropriate Sea-Tac department • Photo – the photo or photos are expected to provide additional documentation on location and the particular deficiency identified

Safety Assurance 5SMS Self-Inspection Program

• If staff believe the hazard requires immediate action, the responsible party will be contacted immediately; alternatively if the responsible party cannot be found, the Airport Duty Manager will be called and the hazard process will be initiated (see Roles and Responsibilities Figure 2 – Hazard Flow by SMS Role. In some cases, the responsible party will be Sea-Tac and calls will be routed to the communication center for proper dispatch. • If a potentially new or undocumented hazard (not on the checklist) is observed or if staff are unsure of the status, a photo will be taken and comments will be included at the bottom of the form for review with the Safety Manager. • At the end of the inspection, the checklist and any associated photos will be delivered to the Safety Specialist who will compile checklist information into a master spreadsheet and link photos to the hazard. When the inspection program is automated, these tasks will be completed electronically much like the current, Part 139 airport inspection program. 

## 3.5 Post Inspection Procedures After inspections are completed, hazard information will be routed electronically to the responsible party. As mentioned above, the inspection staff will complete the checklist and drop off the information to the Safety Specialist for processing. The Safety Specialist will compile the information and forward it to the responsible party by email. The hazard and any associated photos will be included with a proposed correction date and other relevant information. The responsible party will be asked to respond by the proposed due date and will be provided a contact number for questions or further discussion. The Safety Specialist will monito r due dates and provide alerts to the Safety Manager if hazards are not resolved within the proposed timeframe. 

## 3.6 Tracking and Resolving Hazards All hazards collected during the inspection process will be logged and tracked initially in an Excel spreadsheet. Eventually, as part of the proposed electronic system, hazards will be tracked and associated maintenance requests (if necessary) will be integrated into a report that will be available to all AOSs, ADMs, and the Safety Manager for tracking and trending. If multiple or repeat hazards are recorded, the Safety Manager will contact the appropriate Airlines or GSP to discuss resolutions and timelines. If collaboration with Sea-Tac groups is neces sary, the Safety Manager will coordinate a resolution meeting. The Safety Specialist will monitor the program and provide updates to AOSs, ADMS, Maintenance (as needed) and upper management. If necessary, a formal escalation process to airport o perations upper management will ensure that deficiencies are addressed and resolved quickly. In some cases, findings will be considered identified hazards and the risk process will address these potential hazards. See the Guide to Safety Risk Management for more information on hazard identification and processes. When hazards are resolved, staff will re-inspect the area and report back through the checklist the hazard status as closed. The hazard information will be archived and used for future tracking and trending especially if there is a re-occurrence.

Safety Assurance 6SMS Self-Inspection Program 

## 4. Inspection Checklist The inspection checklist is comprised of an Excel spreadsheet which eventually will be automated as part of the Sea-Tac Inspector application. The spreadsheet contains two tabs including a ramp checklist and a bagwell checklist. Also, note that separate FOD inspection checklists exist and will be conducted in addition to the ramp and bagwell inspections. If FOD issues are identified as part of the ramp and bagwell inspections, appropriate ADMS (by area) will be notified during the inspection. The figures below present the contents of the Excel spreadsheet.

Safety Assurance 7SMS Self-Inspection Program

Date: Inspector: Location Time: General Conditions: For FOD Issues, please refer to FOD Checklist H - Hazard H Location Party Responsible for Correction Reported To (Date/Name) Date Corrected (Date/Name) Inspected By (Date/Initials) □

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Smoking

Illegal discharge into storm drainAircraft Servicing Hazard Category Conditions

Other operational safety Issues Failure to give way to wing walkers Failure to secure cargo, mail, or FOD producing Above idle engine run-up at gate Open flames

Driving outside designated driving lanes Wildlife hazards/attractants

Movement area violation Driving between aircraft and marshaller Towing too many carts (6 max) Ramp Inspection Checklist

Blocking fire hydrants Wheeled fire extinguisher at POS gates

Open containers with HAZMAT material Other fire safety hazards HAZMAT spills/leaks

Failure to give way to aircraft and or emergency vehicles Crossed zipper lines

Failure to secure cargo, mail, or FOD producing Used absorbent not properly disposed of Flammables not stored in a fire storage locker

Other environmental hazards

DeicingVehiclular Movement

Other operational safety IssuesEnvironmentalHuman FactorsFire Safety Personnel wearing reflective outer garment Other personnel hazard Driving without a blue badge on ramp

Damaged containers w/o secondary containment

Safety Assurance 8SMS Self-Inspection Program

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Other Deficiencies/Comments: Other construction hazards

Light pole and ramp lighting functioning Gate designation lighting operational if present Jet bridge roll up doors closed between operations Jet bridges and jetway stairs stowed properly Damage to airport property

Equipment parking areas No parking areasGate/Hardstand/Directional Markings Non-movement area boundary markings Gate ID signs/box visible Object free area (OFA) lines visibleLightingConditions

Drivelane markingsTenant Construction

Multi use parking positions Aircraft parking areas /aircraft safety envelope Pedestrian pathways Aircraft parking walkways Equipment restraint lines Taxi lane lines visibleRoadwayMarkings

J lines visible

Nose stops visible Speed limit markings Leaking or malfunctioning equipment Illegally parked vehicle/equipment GSE brakes/chocks utilized Damaged barricades or lighting FOD produced by construction Improper construction barricadingGSEProperties Equipment not stowed properly Other property Issues

Other GSE/vehicle Issues Operational headlights or brake lights GSE with appropriate markings identifying

Safety Assurance 9SMS Self-Inspection Program

Date: Location Inspector: General Conditions: Time: For FOD Issues, please refer to FOD Checklist H - Hazard H Location Party Responsible for Correction Reported To (Date/Name) Date Corrected (Date/Name) Inspected By (Date/Initials) □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Other Deficiencies/Comments:Vehicular Movement Damaged containers w/o secondar y containment Other environmental hazards Hazard Category

Used absorbent not disposed of properly

Other sign issuesSurface SignsConstruction Towing too many carts ( 4 max )

Damage to airport propertyHumanFactors Personnel wearing reflective outer garment Other personnel hazards

Garbage produced by construction

Illegally parked vehicle/e q ui p ment GSE in good working order Speeding

Other construction hazards Improper construction barricadin g /conin g Other operational safety Issues

Direction signs Other property issues

Other GSE/vehicle Issues Leaking or malfunctioning e q ui p ment GSE with appropriate markings identifying co.

Operational headlights and brake li g hts Brakes on GSE equipment utilized Component

Open flamesLighting Lights missing or damaged Adequate lighting for o p erations Location signsGSE Driving without a blue badge Failure to secure cargo, mail, or FOD producing itemsProperties Flammables not stored in a fire stora g e locke r

Equipment not stowed p ro p erl y Bagwell Inspection Checklist

Blocking fire hydrants Other fire safety hazards

Open containers with HAZMAT material SmokingFire SafetyEnvironmental HAZMAT spills/leaks

Safety Assurance 10SMS Self-Inspection Program

Safety Assurance 11 

## 5. Summary of Findings Adding a self inspection program to the ramp, cargo, and the bagwell areas to support SMS should not require additional staffing, with the exception of the Safety Manager and Safety Specialist positions which will be new ly created in support of SMS. Existing AOSs will require additional classroom and hands on training to ensure consistent assessments are conducted and documentation is collected. Today the AOSs and ADMs informally monitor the ramp but with SMS and the associated ramp, cargo, and bagwell self inspection program, consistent safety reviews and documentation will result in a comprehensive safety program for both the movement and non movement areas.