alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1045 

Expressing support for the designation of March 3, 2024, as ‘‘National 

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 29, 2024 

Mr. MORELLE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of March 3, 2024, 

as ‘‘National Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Day’’. 

Whereas triple-negative breast cancer was recognized as a 

distinct type of cancer in 2006; 

Whereas triple-negative breast cancer disproportionately affects young women, Black and Hispanic women, and 

those with BRCA gene mutations; 

Whereas triple-negative breast cancers are estrogen receptornegative, progesterone receptor-negative, and HER2-negative, making them distinct from other breast cancers; 

Whereas there is no targeted therapy for triple-negative 

breast cancers; 

Whereas 10 to 20 percent of all breast cancer diagnoses are 

designated as triple-negative; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1045 IH 

Whereas triple-negative breast cancer can be more aggressive 

and more likely to spread and recur; 

Whereas triple-negative breast cancer accounts for around 25 

percent of all deaths from breast cancer in the United 

States; and 

Whereas March 3, 2024, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as ‘‘National Triple-Negative Breast Cancer 

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘National Triple-Negative Breast Can3 cer Day’’ to create awareness of the devastating effect of 

4 these cancers on families in the United States and the 

5 need for strong action to eradicate triple-negative breast 

6 cancer. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### SCHINDLER, Appellant, v. BANCO DE LONDRES Y MEXICO, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Blrst Department.

February 24, 1905.)

Action by Morris D. Schindler against the Banco de Londres y Mexico. H. Sillcoeks, for appellant. R. S. Rounds, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
§ 716.1 General obligations. ( a ) This part establishes special initial performance standards that apply in the following special circumstances— ( 1 ) § 716.2 applies to surface coal mining operations on steep slopes.
( 2 ) § 716.3 applies to surface coal mining operations involving mountaintop removal.
( 3 ) § 716.4 applies to special bituminous coal mines.
( 4 ) § 716.5 applies to anthracite surface coal mining operations.
( 5 ) § 716.6 applies to surface coal mining operations in Alaska.
( 6 ) § 716.7 applies to surface coal mining operations on prime farmlands.
( b ) All surface coal mining and reclamation operations subject to this part shall comply with the applicable special performance standards in this part. Such operations shall also comply with all general performance standards in part 715 of this chapter unless specifically exempted *in this part* from the requirements of part 715.
#### Martin Timan, Administrator, etc., Respondent, *v.*Thomas E. Kinney, Appellant.

(Argued February 10, 1882;

decided February 28, 1882.)

Decided upon the facts.

*William Kernam,*for appellant.

*D. O. Stoddard*for respondent.

Andrews, Oh. J., reads for affirmance.

All concur, except Tracy, J., who does not vote.

Judgment affirmed.
**Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 September 2011 – Gul Ahmed Textile Mills v Council**

**(Case T-199/04)**

Dumping – Imports of cotton bed linen originating in Pakistan – Injury – Causal link

1.                     *Common commercial policy – Protection against dumping – Injury – Establishing of the causal link – Obligations of the institutions
– Whether factors extraneous to dumping to be taken into account – Abolition of previous anti-dumping duties and ordinary
customs duties under the system of generalised tariff preferences – Included (Agreement on the implementation of Article VI
of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, ‘1994 Anti-dumping Code’, Art. 3.5; Council Regulations No 384/96, Art. 3(6)
and (7), and No 1225/2009, Art. 3(6) and (7)) (see paras 53, 55-61, 68-69, 83)*

2.                     *European Union law – Interpretation – Methods – Interpretation having regard to international agreements concluded by the
Community – Interpretation of Regulation No 384/96 having regard to the 1994 GATT anti-dumping Code (Agreement on the implementation
of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, ‘1994 Anti-dumping Code’; Council Regulation No 384/96) (see
para. 54)*

3.                     *Common commercial policy – Protection against dumping – Injury – Establishing of the causal link – Obligations of the institutions
– Whether factors extraneous to dumping to be taken into account – Need for overall analysis (Council Regulations No 384/96,
Arts 3(6) and (7), and 17(3), and No 1225/2009) (see paras 75-81)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 of 2 March 2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan (OJ 2004 L 66, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicant. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls Council Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 of 2 March 2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan in so far as it concerns Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Gul Ahmed Textile Mills; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Christopher W. Vieth, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 of Dow Jones & Company, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 7, 2004 

 

/s/CHRISTOPHER W. VIETH

Christopher W. Vieth 

Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133523 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133523 COA: 264765 Cass CC: 04-010321-FH TERRY LEE GEORGE, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 15, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                       658
<INVENTORY>                                     23,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,439
<PP&E>                                          41,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,522
<BONDS>                                          5,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           381
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,565
<SALES>                                         96,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,198
<CGS>                                           77,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (421)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (122)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                     251
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,854
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.06
        

</TABLE>
### §421. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 421, comprising section 601 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3121 of this title.
exv10w63



 






EXHIBIT 10.63



ENDORSEMENT IX TO THE FACTORING AGREEMENT OF MARCH 31st, 2002




Between,

Fortis Commercial Financial N.V.

located at Turnhout, Steenweg op Tielen 51




and Supplies Distributors S.A.

located at Grace-Hologne, rue Louis Bleriot 5



has been agreed to modify §1, §2 and §8 of the Particular Conditions as follows:



§ 1.
COUNTRIES* : Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland,
Denmark, Finland, Hungaria, Sweden, South-Africa, Germany, Spain, France, United Kingdom,
Italy, Ireland, Portugal, Greece and Turkey.



If there are agreements with debtors, the client is obliged to submit them tot the fator for
analysis.



Invoices related to prepayments are excluded from this agreement as well as the following
debtors : PFS Web and Supplies Distributors Inc.






 




			
	*	 	minimum assigned turnover per factoring year = 30,000,000 EUR




§2. FACTOR COMMISSION : 0.05 %



§8. INTEREST CONDITIONS :



a. cash advance :



Euribor + 0,60%



b. quarterly provision :



A provision on the highest three monthly debit balance : 0,14%



c. overdraw provision :



A monthly
provision of 1% on the highest amount of the overdraw.



Made out in duplicate at Turnhout on December 12th, 2005




			
	 	 	 
	Supplies Distributors S.A.
	 	Fortis Commercial Finance N.V.






Thierry Denaisse

Managing Director
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30569

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEVIN LOVE, also known as Kelvin Love,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CR-10008-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Kevin Love appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to

possession of cocaine base and cocaine hydrochloride with intent

to distribute. He contends that the district court erred in

imposing a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2 for

reckless endangerment during flight. After reviewing the record

and the briefs of the parties, we hold that the district court

did not clearly err in imposing the two-level enhancement. See
No. 

-2-

United States v. Lee, 989 F.2d 180, 183 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.8


                                                               [GRAPHIC OMITTED]

CEDRIC KUSHNER PROMOTIONS, LTD.

1 Montauk Highway
Southampton, NY 11968
Tel: (631) 726-2700
Fax: (631) 726-7777

October 31, 2002

Mr. Steven Angel
245 East 63rd Street, Apt. 1420
New York, NY 10021


Dear Mr. Angel:

This letter will serve as an amendment to the Consulting Agreement dated May 1,
2002 between Zenascent, Inc. (the "Company") and Steven Angel (the
"Consultant").

In reference to Section 3, Effective Date, Term and Termination of the
Consulting Agreement, the Company shall extend the term of this agreement. This
agreement shall now terminate on November 30, 2002.

All other aspects of this Consulting Agreement shall remain effective for the
entire term of the Agreement.

If the foregoing change is satisfactory, please indicate your acceptance below
and return this letter.

Very truly yours,

ZENASCENT, INC.


/s/ James DiLorenzo
----------------------------------
Jim DiLorenzo, Vice President

Accepted and agreed to
This the 31st day of October, 2002


/s/ Steven Angel
----------------------------------
Steven Angel
### §3193. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–259, title III, §313(b)(1)(B), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2666

Section, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title X, §1003, as added Pub. L. 108–458, title I, §1043, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3679; amended Pub. L. 111–259, title VIII, §804(8), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2747, related to Intelligence Community Scholarship Program.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 441g–2 of this title and repealed prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 111–259, title III, §313(b)(2), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2666, provided that: "Notwithstanding the repeals made by paragraph (1) [repealing this section, amending provisions set out as a note under section 3023 of this title, and repealing provisions set out as a note under section 3021 of this title], nothing in this subsection [repealing this section, amending provisions set out as a note under section 3023 of this title, and repealing provisions set out as a note under section 3021 of this title] shall be construed to amend, modify, or abrogate any agreement, contract, or employment relationship that was in effect in relation to the provisions repealed under paragraph (1) on the day prior to the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 7, 2010]."
§ 90.209 Respirable dust samples; report to operator. ( a ) MSHA shall provide the operator, as soon as practicable, a report with the following data on respirable dust samples submitted or whose results were transmitted electronically, if using a CPDM, in accordance with this part: ( 1 ) The mine identification number;
( 2 ) The locations within the mine from which the samples were taken;
( 3 ) The concentration of respirable dust, expressed as an equivalent concentration for each valid sample;
( 4 ) The average equivalent concentration of respirable dust for all valid samples;
( 5 ) The occupation code;
( 6 ) The reason for voiding any sample; and
( 7 ) The part 90 miner's MSHA Individual Identification Number (MIIN).
( b ) Upon receipt, the operator shall provide a copy of this report to the part 90 miner. The operator shall not post the original or a copy of this report on the mine bulletin board.
( c ) If using a CPDM, the person certified in sampling shall print, sign, and provide to each part 90 miner, a paper record (Dust Data Card) of the sample run within one hour after the start of the part 90 miner's next work shift. This hard-copy record shall include the data entered when the sample run was first programmed, and the following: ( 1 ) The mine identification number;
( 2 ) The location within the mine from which the sample was taken;
( 3 ) The concentration of respirable dust, expressed as an equivalent concentration reported and stored for each sample;
( 4 ) The sampling status conditions encountered for each sample;
( 5 ) The shift length; and
( 6 ) The part 90 miner's MSHA Individual Identification Number (MIIN).
( d ) The operator shall not post data on respirable dust samples for part 90 miners on the mine bulletin board.
Brussels

Green

Bay (All

Water)

Peshtigo

Harbor

Oconto

SE

Oconto

East

Namur

Little

Sturgeon

Dyckesville

Little

Sturgeon SW

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

#

!"

n

█

750

650

700

650

650

700

750

650

650

600

600

700

650

700

650

750

700

700

600

750

650

FOX LN

4 CORNERS RD

SKEET AVE

LOVERS LN

GARDNER RD E GARDNER RD

TRUWAY RD

WHITE STAR RD

PLAINVIEW RD

GARDNER BLUFF RD

LEDGE RD

CO H

WY-N

BRUSSELS RD

CO HWY-N

CO HWY-N

CO HWY-K

DOOR

CO

MARINETTE

CO

DOOR

CO

MARINETTE

CO

S

u

g

ar Cr

Sug

ar Cr

Lake

Michigan

White

Star Cem

Goat Hill

Farm

Wautier

Farm

44°

42'

49

87°

44°

44°

49

40'

49

87°

87°

49

49

49

30"

30"

40'

48 580

66

4

57

49

69

67

48

000 30"

59

50'

350

4

49

4

52' E

62

45'

69

67

E

68

59

43 46

45

4

47 4

49

42'

2

FEET

49

49

49

4

56

63

49

49

4

380

49

49

44°

4

61

49

68

49

64

49

000

000

49

49

66

4

57

63

46

47'

49

49

61

50

62

65

30"

41

58

4 45'

50

30"

43 49 30" 41

49

560

000m

56

30"

58

49

52'

37'

000

4

4

64

50'

87°

N

42

30"

000m

47'

4 4

37'

4

N

49

45

45'

2 000m

FEET

42

000m

49

45'

FEET

FEET

4

65

4

LITTLE STURGEON SW, WI

2013

Expressway Local Connector

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

Secondary Hwy Local Road

WXInterstate Route /. US Route H State Route

LITTLE STURGEON SW QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

Imagery..................................................NAIP, July 2010

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2013

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 16T

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983 (central

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.12

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

DQ

16T

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 29 ́

9 MILS

4° 15 ́

75 MILS
#### §§ 1807.112-1807.129 [Reserved]
### §3152. Limitation on pay

Members of the FBI–DEA Senior Executive Service shall be subject to the limitation under section 5307.

(Added Pub. L. 100–325, §1(a), May 30, 1988, 102 Stat. 581; amended Pub. L. 102–378, §2(9), Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1347.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–378 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to allow the aggregate amount payable to a member of the FBI–DEA Senior Executive Service under this subchapter during any fiscal year to exceed the annual rate payable for positions at level I of the Executive Schedule in effect at the end of such year. This section shall be applied in a manner consistent with paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 5383(b)."
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9965 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9965

 To designate the Maine Forest and Logging Museum, located in Bradley, 
     Maine, as the National Museum of Forestry and Logging History.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2024

 Mr. Golden of Maine introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                    to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Maine Forest and Logging Museum, located in Bradley, 
     Maine, as the National Museum of Forestry and Logging History.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL MUSEUM OF FORESTRY AND LOGGING HISTORY.

    The Maine Forest and Logging Museum, located in Bradley, Maine, 
shall be known and designated as the ``National Museum of Forestry and 
Logging History''. Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States to that museum shall be 
held to be a reference to the National Museum of Forestry and Logging 
History.
                                 <all>
```
#### Margaret Murphy, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, *v.*The Onondaga Iron Company, Appellant.

(Argued March 6, 1882;

decided March 14, 1882.)

*Hisoock, Gifford c& Dolieny*for appellant

*William G. Puger*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

Judgment affirmed.