alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1662.6 Requirements of a FOIA request. ( a ) To be considered a FOIA request under this part, the following must occur: ( 1 ) The request must be written (either by hand or electronically);
( 2 ) The request must be submitted in accordance with § 1662.7;
( 3 ) The requester must provide the following required contact information: requester's name, U.S. or foreign postal address, description of records sought, and fee willing to pay. While not required, the Agency encourages requesters to provide us with their email address and phone number; and
( 4 ) The request must clearly state and reasonably describe what SSS records are requested. Broad, sweeping requests and vague requests are not reasonably described. The requester must describe the records sought in sufficient detail to enable the Agency to locate the records within a reasonable amount of effort. When known, requests should identify the records sought by providing the name/title of the record, applicable date range, subject matter, offices, or employees involved, and record type. If the request is for electronic communications, such as email records, it would assist SSS if the requestor could provide as much information as possible, such as the names, position titles, or other identifying information about the Agency employees involved, as well as the applicable timeframe. Absent sufficient details, the Agency may be unable to search for or locate the records sought. The greater the date range, the longer it may take to process the request and the greater amount of fees that may be charged.
( b ) Requests that do not meet the required criteria above are not considered proper FOIA requests.
( c ) The FOIA requires an Agency to provide the record in any form or format requested by the person if the record is readily reproducible by the Agency in that form or format. SSS will not search or produce records in response to a FOIA request that the FOIA Officer determines would be unduly burdensome (as defined in case law) to process. FOIA requests are unreasonably burdensome when it is a broad, sweeping request that lacks specificity.
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 38 40 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/17 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●


## ★ ● ● ● ●
### §579. Arbitration proceedings

(a) The arbitrator shall set a time and place for the hearing on the dispute and shall notify the parties not less than 5 days before the hearing.

(b) Any party wishing a record of the hearing shall—

(1) be responsible for the preparation of such record;

(2) notify the other parties and the arbitrator of the preparation of such record;

(3) furnish copies to all identified parties and the arbitrator; and

(4) pay all costs for such record, unless the parties agree otherwise or the arbitrator determines that the costs should be apportioned.

(c)(1) The parties to the arbitration are entitled to be heard, to present evidence material to the controversy, and to cross-examine witnesses appearing at the hearing.

(2) The arbitrator may, with the consent of the parties, conduct all or part of the hearing by telephone, television, computer, or other electronic means, if each party has an opportunity to participate.

(3) The hearing shall be conducted expeditiously and in an informal manner.

(4) The arbitrator may receive any oral or documentary evidence, except that irrelevant, immaterial, unduly repetitious, or privileged evidence may be excluded by the arbitrator.

(5) The arbitrator shall interpret and apply relevant statutory and regulatory requirements, legal precedents, and policy directives.

(d) No interested person shall make or knowingly cause to be made to the arbitrator an unauthorized ex parte communication relevant to the merits of the proceeding, unless the parties agree otherwise. If a communication is made in violation of this subsection, the arbitrator shall ensure that a memorandum of the communication is prepared and made a part of the record, and that an opportunity for rebuttal is allowed. Upon receipt of a communication made in violation of this subsection, the arbitrator may, to the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the policies underlying this subchapter, require the offending party to show cause why the claim of such party should not be resolved against such party as a result of the improper conduct.

(e) The arbitrator shall make the award within 30 days after the close of the hearing, or the date of the filing of any briefs authorized by the arbitrator, whichever date is later, unless—

(1) the parties agree to some other time limit; or

(2) the agency provides by rule for some other time limit.

(Added Pub. L. 101–552, §4(b), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2742, §589; renumbered §579, Pub. L. 102–354, §3(b)(2), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–354 renumbered section 589 of this title as this section.
### §20983. Report on human factor research

Not later than 1 year after October 29, 2002, the Commission, in consultation with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, shall submit a report to Congress which assesses the areas of human factor research, including usability engineering and human-computer and human-machine interaction, which feasibly could be applied to voting products and systems design to ensure the usability and accuracy of voting products and systems, including methods to improve access for individuals with disabilities (including blindness) and individuals with limited proficiency in the English language and to reduce voter error and the number of spoiled ballots in elections.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title II, §243, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1688.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15383 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 1624.4 Selection and/or rescheduling of registrants for induction. A registrant in Class 1-A or a registrant subsequently classified 1-A-0 shall be selected and ordered or rescheduled to report for induction in the following categories and in the order indicated: *Provided,* That a registrant who has been identified in accord with the procedures prescribed by the Director of Selective Service as one who will become a member of one of the following categories on the next January 1, may, prior to January 1, be selected and ordered to report for induction on a date after January 1 as a member of such category. ( a ) Volunteers for induction in the order in which they volunteered.
( b ) Registrants whose postponements have expired in the order of expiration.
( c ) Registrants who previously have been ordered to report for induction and whose exemptions or deferments have expired, in the order of their random sequence number (RSN) established by random selection procedures in accord with § 1624.1
( d ) Registrants in the age 20 selection group for the current calendar year in the order of their random sequence number (RSN) established by random selection procedures in accord with § 1624.1.
( e ) Registrants in each succeeding age selection group commencing with age 21 selection group and terminating with the age 34 selection group, in turn, within the group, in the order of their random sequence number (RSN) established by random selection procedures in accord with § 1624.1.
( f ) Registrants in the age 19 selection group for the current calendar year in the order of their random sequence number (RSN) established by random selection procedures in accord with § 1624.1.
( g ) Registrants in the age 18 year and six months selection group and who have not attained the age of 19 in the order of their date of birth with the oldest being selected first.
[47 FR 4648, Feb. 1, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 24455, July 1, 1987]
Clinical Guide > Maintenance and Prevention

# Guide for HIV/AIDS Clinical CareSection 3: Health Care Maintenance and Disease Prevention- Occupational Postexposure Prophylaxis
- Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis
- Preventing HIV Transmission / Prevention with Positives
- Immunizations for HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents
- Preventing Exposure to Opportunistic and Other Infections
- Opportunistic Infection Prophylaxis
- Latent Tuberculosis Infection
- Smoking Cessation
- Nutrition
# Patent

## Title
Wrap

## Abstract

Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings and, therefore, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practised otherwise than as particularly described.

## Background
## Claims

1. In a process for upgrading high boiling hydrocarbon materials to valuable lower boiling materials .[.is.]. .Iadd.in .Iaddend.a hydrogenation operation including at least one expanded bed catalytic hydrogenation zone to produce an upgraded hydrogenated product, the improvement comprising: a 5-volume percent distillation temperature of at least 450.degree. F. with at least 25 -volume percent thereof boiling above 950.degree.F.; cooling the liquid recycle to a temperature of at least 350.degree. F. and no greater than 700.degree. F. to .[.separate.]. .Iadd.precipitate coke precursors; .Iaddend..Iadd.removing essentially only .Iaddend.coke precursors from the .Iadd.cooled .Iaddend.liquid recycle; and subsequent to .[.separation.].  .Iadd.removal .Iaddend.of said coke precursors providing the liquid recycle to an expanded bed catalytic hydrogenation zone.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the cooled liquid recycle is passed through a bed of particulate solids to deposit separated coke precursors on the solids.

3. The process of claim 2 wherein the recycle liquid is a 600.degree. F..sup.+ fraction.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein the recycle liquid is a 1000.degree. F..sup.+ fraction.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein the recycle is cooled to a temperature of at least 400.degree. F.

6. The process of claim 1 wherein the recycle is cooled to a temperature of no greater than 600.degree. F. .Iadd.7. The process of claim 1 wherein the cooled liquid recycle is centrifuged to enhance separation and removal of coke precursors. .Iaddend. .Iadd.8. The process of claim 7 wherein the recycle liquid is a 600.degree. F..sup.+ fraction. .Iaddend. .Iadd.9.  The process of claim 7 wherein the recycle is a 1000.degree. F..sup.+ fraction. .Iaddend. 10. The process of claim 7 wherein the recycle is cooled to a temperature of no greater than 600.degree. F.
### §13123. Administrative provisions

(a) Assistance to Director.—Upon the request of the Director, each executive agency is directed to—

(1) make its services, personnel, and facilities available to the Director to the greatest practicable extent for the performance of functions under this chapter; and

(2) except when prohibited by law, furnish to the Director all information and records in its possession which the Director may determine to be necessary for the performance of the Director's duties.

The authority of the Director under this section includes the authority to request assistance from the inspector general of an agency in conducting investigations pursuant to the Office of Government Ethics responsibilities under this chapter. The head of any agency may detail such personnel and furnish such services, with or without reimbursement, as the Director may request to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(b) Gift Acceptance Authority.—

(1) In general.—The Director is authorized to accept and utilize on behalf of the United States, any gift, donation, bequest, or devise of money, use of facilities, personal property, or services for the purpose of aiding or facilitating the work of the Office of Government Ethics.

(2) Limitations.—No gift may be accepted—

(A) that attaches conditions inconsistent with applicable laws or regulations; or

(B) that is conditioned upon or will require the expenditure of appropriated funds that are not available to the Office of Government Ethics.

(3) Criteria for determining appropriateness of gift acceptance.—The Director shall establish written rules setting forth the criteria to be used in determining whether the acceptance of contributions of money, services, use of facilities, or personal property under this subsection would reflect unfavorably upon the ability of the Office of Government Ethics, or any employee of such Office, to carry out its responsibilities or official duties in a fair and objective manner, or would compromise the integrity or the appearance of the integrity of its programs or any official involved in those programs.

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(c), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4301.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 13123 | 5 U.S.C. App. (EGA §403) | Pub. L. 95–521, title IV, §403, Oct. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 1863; Pub. L. 98–150, §5, Nov. 11, 1983, 97 Stat. 960; Pub. L. 100–598, §9, Nov. 3, 1988, 102 Stat. 3035; Pub. L. 104–179, §2, Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1566. |

Section
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 23.2






               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



Sedona Corporation
Limerick, Pennsylvania


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into Registration Statements
of Form S-3 (Nos. 333-71457, 333-31983, 33-47127, 333-03719, 333-52973) and
related prospectuses and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-53051)
of our report dated March 13, 1998, except for Note 14 which is dated March 27,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997, and
the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and
schedule for each of the two years in the period then ended December 31, 1997,
of Sedona Corporation (formerly Scan-Graphics, Inc.) included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectuses.




                                            BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

April 9, 1999
NO. 07-08 -008 9-CR IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL A APR IL 24 , 200 8

_________

_________

_________

___ BIL LIE DEAN RANDOLPH, APPE LLA NT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 64 T H DI ST RI CT COU RT OF HA L E CO UNT Y; NO . A1 6933- 0609; HO NO RA BLE R OBER T W . KI NK AID , J R. , J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before CAMPBE LL a nd HANCOCK an d PIRT LE, JJ. A BA TE A ND R EMA ND Appel lan t, Bi ll ie Dea n R andol ph filed a noti ce of ap peal , on Febr uar y 19, 2008, from his rev ocat ion of communi ty su per v is ion . The tr ial co urt fil ed i ts cer ti ficat ion repr esent ing that appel lan t has the ri g ht of appeal. How ev er , the appell ate record reflect s t hat a ppel lan t failed to sig n the certif ication , pursua n t t o Te x as Rule of Appe llate Proce dure 25.2 (d), w hic h req uires the c erti ficat ion to be s ig ned by appel lan t and a c opy

se rv ed on him. Conse quently, w e ab ate t he app eal and rem and t he ca use to the 64 th District Court of Hal e County

for f urther proce edi ng s. On remand, the tr ial courtsh all uti li z e w hatev er2

means itfinds nec ess ar y to deter mine w hether

appell ant desi re s to prosec ute t he appe al and, if so , t o obt ain hi s s ig nature on an amended tr ial co urt’ s c erti ficat ion . I f neces sar

y , t he tr ial co urt s hal l ex ecut e findi ng s of fact , c oncl usi ons of law , and any nec ess ar

y orders i t m a y enter

r eg ardin g the aforementi oned i ss ues and c ause it s findi ng s, conc lus ion s, and orders, if any , to be inc lud ed i n a s uppl emental cl er k’ s record. T he trial cou rt shall f ile the sup plem e nta l clerk’s record an d the supp lem ent al reporte r’s re cord, i f any , w it h the C ler k o f this C our t by M ay 23, 2008.

Pe r C ur i am

Do not p ubl is h.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, A. P. Kimble, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 16, 2006



/s/    A. P. KimbleA. P. KimbleSenior Vice President andChief Financial and Accounting Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1901.04 Suggestions and complaints.

The Agency welcomes suggestions or complaints with regard to its administration of the Privacy Act. Many requesters will receive pre-paid, customer satisfaction survey cards. Letters of suggestion or complaint should identify the specific purpose and the issues for consideration. The Agency will respond to all substantive communications and take such actions as determined feasible and appropriate.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. John Vincent Carothers, Defendant.

— Motion for removal of a criminal action from the County Court of Orange County to a term of the Supreme Court in another county (Code Grim. Pro., § 344, subd. 2; § 346), or, in the alternative, for a stay of trial, denied. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 7.85 Critical characteristics. The following critical characteristics shall be inspected or tested on each diesel engine to which an approval marking is affixed— ( a ) Fuel rate is set properly; and
( b ) Fuel injection pump adjustment is sealed, if applicable.
#### Susan Yager, Respondent, v. Dock and Coal Co. Inc., Defendant-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. M. H. Yager et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court dismissing defendant’s amended third-party complaint against third-party defendants. The plaintiff’s complaint seeks to recover for personal injuries sustained in a fall while she was attempting to assist her father in docking a cruiser at defendant’s dock. It alleges failure of defendant to supply a dock attendant, failure to answer standard signal, allowing accumulation of sea weed, failure to remove the same and in suffering the dock to become and remain slippery. We view these as allegations of active negligence. Because the complaint uses such blanket phrases as “ among other things ” and being *“*otherwise careless and negligent ” does not justify an inference of passive negligence. Moreover, as the court below held, the only negligence alleged against the third-party defendant is that the boat churned up the seaweed and deposited it on the dock, in which event there would be no liability on the part of defendant. We see nothing in the original complaint and the amended third-party complaint which alleges a situation calling for indemnity. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
### §5364. Remedial actions

Under regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, the Office may require any agency—

(1) to report to the Office information with respect to vacancies (including impending vacancies);

(2) to take such steps as may be appropriate to assure employees receiving benefits under section 5362 or 5363 of this title have the opportunity to obtain necessary qualifications for the selection to positions which would minimize the need for the application of such sections;

(3) to establish a program under which employees receiving benefits under section 5362 or 5363 of this title are given priority in the consideration for or placement in positions which are equal to their retained grade or pay; and

(4) to place certain employees, notwithstanding the fact their previous position was in a different agency, but only in circumstances in which the Office determines the exercise of such authority is necessary to carry out the purpose of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title VIII, §801(a)(1), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1220.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5364, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 473, which related to miscellaneous positions in the executive branch, was renumbered section 5374 of this title by Pub. L. 95–454, title VIII, §801(a)(3)(A)(ii), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1221.
#### § 955.5 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Applicant* means a person who submits an application for an OSM blaster certificate.

*Application* means a request for an OSM blaster certificate submitted on the prescribed form, including the required fee and any applicable supporting evidence or other attachments.

*Issue* and *issuance* mean to grant to an applicant his or her first OSM blaster certificate that is not granted through reciprocity.

*Reciprocity* means the recognition by OSM of a blaster certificate issued by a State regulatory authority under an OSM-approved blaster certification program as qualifying an applicant for the grant of an OSM blaster certificate.

*Reissue* and *reissuance* are synonymous with the term *recertification* in § 850.15(c) of this chapter, and mean to grant to an applicant who holds a renewed OSM blaster certificate, or who holds an OSM blaster certificate that expired more than 1 year prior to the date of his or her application, or who held an OSM blaster certificate that was revoked, a subsequent certificate that is not granted through reciprocity and for which additional training and examination are required.

*Renew* and *renewal* mean to grant to an applicant who holds an issued or reissued OSM blaster certificate a subsequent certificate that is not granted through reciprocity and for which additional training and examination are not required.

*Replace* and *replacement* mean to grant to an applicant a duplicate OSM blaster certificate as a substitute for one that was lost or destroyed.
#### William Tomasello, as Stockholder of and on Behalf of All Stockholders Similarly Situated of, and on Behalf of Beach Haven Apartments No. 1, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Fred C. Trump et al., Appellants.

In a stockholder’s action for an accounting and other relief, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 28, 1961, which denied their motion: (1) for a separate and prior trial of their separate defense and counterclaim based on an alleged settlement agreement, and (2) for a limitation of their examination before trial to the issues relating to the settlement agreement. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements; the examination to proceed on 20 days’ notice, or on a day to be mutually fixed by the parties. No opinion. Beldock, P, J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins,' JJ., concur.
Apr/26/2024 4:25:43 PM Ryan 40652130 4/4

IN TEE SUPREME COURT OF TRE STATE OF MONTANA

SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO, DA 24-0155 DANIEL R. WOOD, Petitioner &Appellant, vs. STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent &Appellee. Order Granting Extension Of Time It is hereby ordered that Daniel Wood is granted an extension of30 days to file the Appellant's Opening Brief. The original due date was April 25th. The new deadline is May 24th. BY: YUSTICE, MTSC 04/26/2024 Case Number: DA 24-0155