alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6131. Criteria and review

(a) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this subchapter or any collective bargaining agreement and subject to subsection (c) of this section, if the head of an agency finds that a particular flexible or compressed schedule under this subchapter has had or would have an adverse agency impact, the agency shall promptly determine not to—

(1) establish such schedule; or

(2) continue such schedule, if the schedule has already been established.

(b) For purposes of this section, "adverse agency impact" means—

(1) a reduction of the productivity of the agency;

(2) a diminished level of services furnished to the public by the agency; or

(3) an increase in the cost of agency operations (other than a reasonable administrative cost relating to the process of establishing a flexible or compressed schedule).

(c)(1) This subsection shall apply in the case of any schedule covering employees in a unit represented by an exclusive representative.

(2)(A) If an agency and an exclusive representative reach an impasse in collective bargaining with respect to an agency determination under subsection (a)(1) not to establish a flexible or compressed schedule, the impasse shall be presented to the Federal Service Impasses Panel (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "Panel").

(B) The Panel shall promptly consider any case presented under subparagraph (A), and shall take final action in favor of the agency's determination if the finding on which it is based is supported by evidence that the schedule is likely to cause an adverse agency impact.

(3)(A) If an agency and an exclusive representative have entered into a collective bargaining agreement providing for use of a flexible or compressed schedule under this subchapter and the head of the agency determines under subsection (a)(2) to terminate a flexible or compressed schedule, the agency may reopen the agreement to seek termination of the schedule involved.

(B) If the agency and exclusive representative reach an impasse in collective bargaining with respect to terminating such schedule, the impasse shall be presented to the Panel.

(C) The Panel shall promptly consider any case presented under subparagraph (B), and shall rule on such impasse not later than 60 days after the date the Panel is presented the impasse. The Panel shall take final action in favor of the agency's determination to terminate a schedule if the finding on which the determination is based is supported by evidence that the schedule has caused an adverse agency impact.

(D) Any such schedule may not be terminated until—

(i) the agreement covering such schedule is renegotiated or expires or terminates pursuant to the terms of that agreement; or

(ii) the date of the Panel's final decision, if an impasse arose in the reopening of the agreement under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph.

(d) This section shall not apply with respect to flexible schedules that may be established without regard to the authority provided under this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 97–221, §2(a)(2), July 23, 1982, 96 Stat. 231.)
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Extent of Federal Agencies' Oversight of AIG Compensation Varied, and Important Challenges Remain

              																	United States. Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program. 						*Extent of Federal Agencies' Oversight of AIG Compensation Varied, and Important Challenges Remain, SIGTARP-10-002*,												Washington: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										October 14, 2009,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5110,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Phyllis Ganas et al., Respondents, v. Mary Terry, Respondent. Avrach, Clark & Hollins, Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services sustained by the plaintiffs as a consequence of the negligence of the defendant in the operation, ownership and control of a motor vehicle, the attorneys of record for the defendant appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 22, 1962, which denied, after reconsideration, a motion by the said attorneys for permission to withdraw as the defendant’s attorneys and for *“*other and further relief ” on the ground that their principal, an insurance carrier, had disclaimed *827liability by reason of the defendant’s failure to co-operate in the defense of the action. Order modified by adding the following four paragraphs: (1) A paragraph that the denial of the attorneys’ motion to withdraw is without prejudice to the prosecution of a plenary action by the insurance carrier against the defendant for a judgment declaring their respective rights under the policy issued by the carrier to the defendant and declaring whether or not the defendant has breached her obligation of co-operation under the terms of such policy. (2) A paragraph that all further proceedings in this action are stayed pending the commencement and determination of the said action for the declaratory judgment. (3) A paragraph permitting the plaintiff or defendant in this action to move to vacate this stay in the event that the insurance carrier should fail to commence and prosecute such action for the declaratory judgment with all due diligence and expedition. (4) A paragraph that the denial of this motion by defendant’s attorneys to withdraw is without prejudice to its renewal upon the determination of the said action for the declaratory judgment. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, on this motion issues of fact and law are raised as to the defendant’s lack of co-operation with her insurance carrier in the proper defense of this action and as to the right of the carrier to disclaim liability and to withdraw completely from the defense. Such issues should first be promptly determined in a plenary action for a declaratory judgment brought by the insurance carrier against the defendant; and pending such determination this action should remain in *status quo*and its further prosecution stayed (cf. *Goldstein*v. *Goldstein,*13 Misc 2d 1084; *Westchester Fire Ins. Co.*v. *Lipsky,*9 Misc 2d 390; *Brooks*v. *City of New York,*1 Misc 2d 740, 741; *Nationwide Mut. Ins.*v. *Dennis,*14 A D 2d 188, 189; *United States Fid. & Guar. Co.*v. *von Bargen,*7 A D 2d 872, affd. 7 N Y 2d 932; *New Amsterdam Cas. Co.*v. *Kirschenbaum,*194 Misc. 104, 106). Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Sbarro, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended  January 2, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Peter  Beaudrault,
Principal  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  to  the  best  of my
knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  April 22, 2005

/s/  Peter Beaudrault
-------------------------------------
Peter Beaudrault
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


NOTE: A signed original of this  certification  has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00282-CV

AMANECER PRIMARY HOME CARE, LLC, NOELIA MORIN, ANDRES ALVAREZ, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CANTU HOME HEALTH AGENCY

v.

ACE PRIMARY HOME CARE, INC.

On Appeal from the

206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-0172-14-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 7, 2019
### §3525. Regulations

The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe regulations to carry out this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 107–296, title XIII, §1313(a)(1)(A), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2294.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3551, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 429; Pub. L. 90–491, §2, Aug. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 791, related to restoration of positions of Federal and District of Columbia employees upon release from duty in Reserves or National Guard, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–353, §§2(b)(2)(B), 8, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3169, 3175, effective with respect to reemployments initiated on or after first day after 60-day period beginning Oct. 13, 1994, with transition rules.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 1313(a)(4) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 3521 of this title.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DIANE KATHRYN PARRISH,

Appellant,

v.

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE,

Appellee.

No. 4D22

- 2724

[ May 17, 2023 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County; Jennifer Alcorta Waters, Judge; L.T. Case No. 22000903

-

SC

- AXMX.

Diane Kathryn Parrish, Port St. Lucie, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d

1050, (Fla. 1980).

W ARNER

, D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §4311. Definitions

For the purpose of this subchapter, "agency", "senior executive", and "career appointee" have the meanings set forth in section 3132(a) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title IV, §405(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1167.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 9 months after Oct. 13, 1978, and congressional review of provisions of sections 401 through 412 of Pub. L. 95–454, see section 415(a)(1), (b), of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 3131 of this title.
### §4141. Claims settlement period

The Commission shall complete its affairs in connection with the settlement of claims pursuant to this subchapter not later than four years following the enactment of legislation making appropriations to the Commission for payment of administrative expenses incurred in carrying out its functions under this subchapter.

(July 3, 1948, ch. 826, title II, §211, as added Pub. L. 87–846, title I, §103, Oct. 22, 1962, 76 Stat. 1111.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 2017j of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Protests Relating to Awards by Commission; Notice by Publication in Federal Register

Notwithstanding the provisions of this section and section 4140 of this title, receipt and consideration of filed and published protests relating to awards made by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission which result in modification of such awards shall be certified and paid by the Secretary of the Treasury out of the War Claims Fund in accordance with section 4143 of this title. See section 615 of act Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, as added by Pub. L. 94–542, Oct. 18, 1976; 90 Stat. 2512, set out as a note under section 1623 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
### §307102. Effective date of regulations

(a) Publication in Federal Register.—No final regulation of the Secretary shall become effective prior to the expiration of 30 calendar days after it is published in the Federal Register during which either or both Houses of Congress are in session.

(b) Disapproval of Regulation by Resolution of Congress.—The regulation shall not become effective if, within 90 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after the date of promulgation, both Houses of Congress adopt a concurrent resolution, the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: "That Congress disapproves the regulation promulgated by the Secretary dealing with the matter of         , which regulation was transmitted to Congress on         ," the blank spaces in the resolution being appropriately filled.

(c) Failure of Congress To Adopt Resolution of Disapproval of Regulation.—If at the end of 60 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after the date of promulgation of a regulation, no committee of either House of Congress has reported or been discharged from further consideration of a concurrent resolution disapproving the regulation, and neither House has adopted such a resolution, the regulation may go into effect immediately. If, within the 60 calendar days, a committee has reported or been discharged from further consideration of such a resolution, the regulation may go into effect not sooner than 90 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after its promulgation unless disapproved as provided for.

(d) Sessions of Congress.—For purposes of this section—

(1) continuity of session is broken only by an adjournment sine die; and

(2) the days on which either House is not in session because of an adjournment of more than 3 days to a day certain are excluded in the computation of 60 and 90 calendar days of continuous session of Congress.

(e) Congressional Inaction or Rejection of Resolution of Disapproval Not Deemed Approval of Regulation.—Congressional inaction on or rejection of a resolution of disapproval shall not be deemed an expression of approval of the regulation.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3231.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 307102 | 16 U.S.C. 470w–6. | Pub. L. 89–665, title III, §307, as added Pub. L. 96–515, title V, §501, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3004; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(29), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584; Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(d)(1)(O), (2)(E), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4196; Pub. L. 106–176, title I, §120(a)(2), Mar. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 28; Pub. L. 106–208, §5(a)(11)–(13), May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 319. |

Section
### SUBCHAPTER II—EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE PAY RATES
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Robert T. DeVincenzi, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(i)           the
Quarterly Report of LaserCard Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(ii)          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of LaserCard
Corporation.





Date:  February
10, 2009








/s/Robert T.
DeVincenzi


Robert T.
DeVincenzi


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 1282 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 007

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### In spection and Replacement 1.0 $ 85.00 $ 

### 227 $ 312.00 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?
YES * NO

* Exp lanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.
YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transport ation?
YES * NO



### * Exp lanation 

### :
### §40309. Availability of other Federal personnel and data

Each department, agency, or other instrumentality of the Federal Government that is engaged in or concerned with, or that has authority over, matters relating to space—

(1) may, upon a written request from the Administrator, make available, on a reimbursable basis or otherwise, any personnel (with their consent and without prejudice to their position and rating), service, or facility which the Administrator considers necessary to carry out any provision of this chapter;

(2) may, upon a written request from the Administrator, furnish any available data or other information which the Administrator considers necessary to carry out any provision of this chapter; and

(3) may cooperate with the Administration.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3388.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40309 | 42 U.S.C. 2486i. | Pub. L. 100–147, title II, §211, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 875. |

Section
#### § 1908.35 [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alfonso Palma, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to withdraw appeal, granted. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
# oijpo o 

# US AAirbill . ^ aD3Hb7^1flfiD D DBI D FedE

xBilli i U Fro m / / Dat e OyArA ^

A7P^'^^«:' ^

FedE xAccoun tNumbe t1305-9376~ 3 

# \/\nip2 > L.77777-7/O xPH.„.^/ VY^/n^-3/5 9 Sendei' s Nam e Compan y. Addres s 

# U S ENVIROMENTA L 144 5 ROS B AV E F L r.i^ , DALLA S U You rInterna l Billin o Referenc e Inlormalio n 

# PROTEC T 1 2

Stat e 

# AGC Y

T X 7I P 

# 7520 2 DeptyRoof/Suite/Roo m i k U Expres s Packag e Servic e Package s unde rI5 0 lbs . 1 KZp'^ ^

Priorit yOvernigh t R I i FedE xStandar d Overnigh t 1*^ 1 INcx tbusines s mornmo l 1 I INE» " busines s atloinonn l g I I FedE xFirs t Overnigh t I I (tatlies i nex tbusines s moiiwi g tteliwen ; l o eelec l lor.Blioni l tttislw i inte s BJP' I 3 1 1 FedE x2Da y2 0 F l ^^^ ^ Expres s Save r I 1 (Secon d busines s day l ' ' )Th«i l biisinos s ttnvl ' ' FedE xletiB i Rai fno t ovailable . Minimu m rharpp ; On e [imim trole . ' •Ji ] Expres s Freigh t Servic e Package s ove risoibs . 7 1 I FedE) ( Overnigh t freigh t 8 1 1 FedE xZDa yFreigh t 83 1 1 FedE xI I I iNBK

tbusines s day ) I 1 ISurDn d husimis s day ) 1 1 IU| tm 3 I (Cat I fo rdeliverysclieiiiilc . Se e bac k fo rdetaile d descriplion s o f ftc'i! 

# H Packagin g p FedE xZ^H^ U J Q FedE

x4^; ;
' — OcOaie d valu e llmi l S5D 0 —— ' 1 '

- fOii B hu n n)U5ll' o 

# EI Recipie i Nam e 

# ^ tobef f^j^TnhhJif y....3oiM7zA7M l WotPayPVil 4 C 7/ 4 A/Torv ^ z

Address . IT o 'HOLD " alfedt xlocation , ptin l redtxaddres s here ) 

# ^ D ^ l i J04/7P

^ Sf P 

# P U Specia l Handlin g ip- , .|— , ^^ ^ Doe s Ai S shipmen t contai n ilangeroii s goods? ' LJ'^ O ^ 1 1^^ ^ S^f e I lofvke.lUNlBl S » H I I •Oanucioi B Gooil s tietn o Q Paymen t Q
^ TM ^ H i«f"« L » ^DRecipien t 3Qlhit d Part y4QCr e

Cit y 

# ~^d(4cz>7i/7 x Dept/Root/Suite/Root n I j Chec k her e ' — ' i f residenc e |E)^>i ) charg p Bpplie f lo rtedt xEnptes s Ssvflr | secbo n I wil l b e brUed t - Itnte rFedE > actmm tD AO I Cindl l Coir tnn . belo w

Fo rHOL D a t FedE xLocatio n chec k her e 

# I r1 Hol d Weekda yn « i 1 Hol d SaturdH y(No t avallBbl e a t al i locations ) j I |ND I Availabl e wjit i ^ • I I lAvarlabl e lo rFedE xPriorii vDvBmigti i ' ' FedE xRrs t OuBmighl l "—- * en d (BdE > 2D3 Vonly l ' 

# ..ate/4/

^ .P^2/ 0 7 r FedE x Accoun tNo. _ Credi t Cart ) N o Tota l Package s Fo rSaturda yDeliver ychec k her e 

# 3 1 1 lEvU o CHame . tJotsvailabt t t o a' t lacaiions l

(A'.'Bilebl e (D

< Fr-dE'Priortt yOi'6ri>igh r ' ' anrtFtriE i ?Dfi vonly ) Tota l Weigh t Tota l Declare d Value ' % • • .0 0 'Whendlclarin g n valu e higlie rtttanSlDOpCTiliipmeni . vo cP^ VBiiaddiiionaltliarQc . Se e SERVIC E eONDITlONS . DECURE D VALU t AN D UMI 1 0 ^ UABIUTYscciro n lo rlirnhe p intofmatm n 

# L E T Releas e Signatur e You tsignalui e auttiDiife s Federa l Expres s t o dclive t thi s sliip ftien l witliou l obtainin g a signatur e an d agree s l o indemntt y an d hol d harmles s Federa l Expres s tio m an yresultin g claims . 

# Igp ] BDHNtTllBBD D 

# 0O460043 4 \



# Hzipn z / ^£iF P 

# Z44X- ^

905036 3



# illllllllll H