alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000031364                         
<NAME> Eckerd Corporation                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000  
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Feb-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-25-1997
<CASH>                                              37,834
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      129,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,000
<INVENTORY>                                      1,228,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,398,301
<PP&E>                                             889,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                     370,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,520,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              835,854
<BONDS>                                          1,279,870
<COMMON>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         255,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,520,423
<SALES>                                          4,276,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,276,610
<CGS>                                            3,347,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,347,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   743,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2,695
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  46,543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    136,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41,310
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 95,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        95,012
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009180EN.01003801.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/38

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 June 2009 — ACEA v Commission

(Case T-297/02) (1)

1

(State aid - Scheme of aid granted by the Italian authorities to certain public utilities in the form of tax exemptions and loans at preferential rates - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Actions for annulment - Individual concern - Admissibility - Existing aid or new aid - Article 87(3)(c) EC)

2009/C 180/68

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ACEA SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Giardina, L. Radicati di Brozolo and V. Puca, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: ACSM Como SpA (Como, Italy) (represented by L. Radicati di Brozolo and M. Merola, lawyers) and AEM — Azienda Energetica Metropolitana Torino SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by M. Merola and L. Radicati di Brozolo, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 2003/193/EC of 5 June 2002 on State aid granted by Italy in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding (OJ 2003 L 77, p. 21).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible in so far as it relates to the Cassa Depositi e Prestiti loans. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible in so far as it relates to the Cassa Depositi e Prestiti loans.

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action as unfounde. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action as unfounde.

| 3. | Orders ACEA SpA to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders ACEA SpA to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the Commission.

| 4. | Orders ACSM Como SpA and AEM — Azienda Energetica Metropolitana Torino SpA to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders ACSM Como SpA and AEM — Azienda Energetica Metropolitana Torino SpA to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
THIRD QUARTER 10 - Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH 10 - Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  336,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,522
<INVENTORY>                                        955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               382,986
<PP&E>                                          56,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 618,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          221,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           482
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   618,312
<SALES>                                        428,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               428,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  427,103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,397
<INCOME-TAX>                                       344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                476
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       476
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01



</TABLE>
HeinOnline -- 65 Fed. Reg. 67249 2000
HeinOnline -- 65 Fed. Reg. 67250 2000
HeinOnline -- 65 Fed. Reg. 67251 2000
HeinOnline -- 65 Fed. Reg. 67252 2000
#### § 910.702 Exemption for coal extraction incidental to the extraction of other minerals.

Part 702 of this chapter, *Exemption for Coal Extraction Incidental to the Extraction of Other Minerals,* shall apply to any person who conducts coal extraction incidental to the extraction of other minerals for purposes of commercial use or sale.

[54 FR 52123, Dec. 20, 1989]
#### FLINT et al., Appellants, v. BURNS, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by Arden A. Flint and Charles H. Sabin against John A. Burns.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

PARKER, P. J., and CHESTER, J., dissent.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Gary O. Marino                   |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Gary O. Marino                       |   |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                 |   |
| /s/ Larry Forman                     |   |
| Larry Forman                         |   |
| Vice President and                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer              |   |

----
890.06305
### §3037. Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency

#### (a) Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency

There is a Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency who shall be appointed by the President.

#### (b) Duties

The Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shall—

(1) assist the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency in carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency; and

(2) during the absence or disability of the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, or during a vacancy in the position of Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, act for and exercise the powers of the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title I, §104B, as added Pub. L. 111–259, title IV, §423(a), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2727.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 403–4c of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 111–259, title IV, §423(c), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2728, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section and amending section 5314 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees] shall apply on the earlier of—

"(1) the date of the appointment by the President of an individual to serve as Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency pursuant to section 104B of the National Security Act of 1947 [50 U.S.C. 3037], as added by subsection (a), except that the individual administratively performing the duties of the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency as of the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 7, 2010] may continue to perform such duties until the individual appointed to the position of Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency assumes the duties of such position; or

"(2) the date of the cessation of the performance of the duties of the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency by the individual administratively performing such duties as of the date of the enactment of this Act."
§ 950.16 Required program amendments. Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17, Wyoming is required to submit for OSMRE's approval the following required amendments by the dates specified. ( a ) By September 15, 2024, Wyoming shall correct the provision in Chapter 14, where the final word in the provision, “location,” was inadvertently used in place of “condition,” as previously approved.
( b ) By September 15, 2024, Wyoming shall add the word “Division” to the “Land Quality Coal Rules and Regulations” as referenced in Chapter 14, Subsections 3(c), 3(d), 3(e), and 4(d).
[89 FR 3569, Jan. 19, 2024]
#### § 955.2 Implementation.

In accordance with §§ 750.19, 816.61(c) and 817.61(c) of this chapter, after June 30, 1987, in Federal program States and on Indian lands any person who is responsible for conducting blasting operations at a blasting site shall have a current OSM blaster certificate.
# C_2023300EN.01000501.xml

| 25.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2023/C 300/05)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 31.7.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 31.7.2023 – 31.12.2023 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or Group of stocks | BUM/ATLANT |
| Species | Blue marlin (Makaira nigricans) |
| Zone | Atlantic Ocean |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 09/TQ194 |

Date and time of closure

31.7.2023

Duration

31.7.2023 – 31.12.2023

Member State

Portugal

Stock or Group of stocks

BUM/ATLANT

Species

Blue marlin (Makaira nigricans)

Zone

Atlantic Ocean

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

09/TQ194

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000766041
<NAME> CENTRAL SPRINKLER CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,205
<SECURITIES>                                    10,079
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,813
<INVENTORY>                                     35,955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,433
<PP&E>                                          43,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,141
<BONDS>                                         27,516
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,360
<SALES>                                        158,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,849
<CGS>                                          107,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,379
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,945
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,458
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,458
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.50



</TABLE>
### §6106. Time clocks; restrictions

A recording clock may not be used to record time of an employee of an Executive department in the District of Columbia, except that the Bureau of Engraving and Printing may use such recording clocks.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 516; Pub. L. 97–221, §6(a), July 23, 1982, 96 Stat. 234.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 27. | Feb. 24, 1899, ch. 187, §1 (14th par. on p. 864), 30 Stat. 864. |

Statutes at Large

The words "District of Columbia" are substituted for "Washington" as a clearer statement.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1982—Pub. L. 97–221 substituted "District of Columbia, except that the Bureau of Engraving and Printing may use such recording clocks" for "District of Columbia".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Pub. L. 97–221, §6(b), July 23, 1982, 96 Stat. 234, provided that: "The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect October 1, 1982. Section 5 of this Act [set out in the Termination Date of 1982 Amendment note under section 6101 of this title] shall not apply to the amendment made by this section."
§ 740.5 Definitions. ( a ) As used in this subchapter, the term: *Authorized officer* means any person authorized to take official action on behalf of a Federal agency that has administrative jurisdiction over Federal lands.
*Coal lease* means a Federal coal lease or license issued by the Bureau of Land Management pursuant to the Mineral Leasing Act and the Federal Acquired Lands Leasing Act of 1947 (30 U.S.C. 351 *et seq.*).
*Cooperative agreement* means a cooperative agreement entered into in accordance with section 523(c) of the Act and part 745 of this chapter.
*Federal land management agency* means a Federal agency having administrative jurisdiction over the surface of Federal lands that are subject to these regulations.
*Federal lease bond* means the bond or equivalent security required by 43 CFR part 3400 to assure compliance with the terms and conditions of a Federal coal lease.
*Federal lessee protection bond* means a bond payable to the United States or the State, whichever is applicable, for use and benefit of a permittee or lessee of the surface lands to secure payment of any damages to crops or tangible improvements on Federal lands, pursuant to section 715 of the Act.
*Lease terms, conditions and stipulations* means all of the standard provisions of a Federal coal lease, including provisions relating to lease duration, fees, rentals, royalties, lease bond, production and recordkeeping requirements, and lessee rights of assignment, extension, renewal, termination and expiration, and site-specific requirements included in Federal coal leases in addition to other terms and conditions which relate to protection of the environment and of human, natural and mineral resources.
*Leased Federal coal* means coal leased by the United States pursuant to 43 CFR part 3400, except mineral interests in coal on Indian lands.
Mineral Leasing Act or MLA means the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, 30 U.S.C. 181, *et seq.*
*Mining plan* means the plan for mining leased Federal coal required by the Mineral Leasing Act.
*Permit application package* means a proposal to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations on Federal lands, including an application for a permit, permit revision or permit renewal, all the information required by the Act, this subchapter, the applicable State program, any applicable cooperative agreement and all other applicable laws and regulations including, with respect to leased Federal coal, the Mineral Leasing Act and its implementing regulations.
*Regulatory authority* means the State regulatory authority pursuant to a cooperative agreement approved under part 745 of this chapter or, in the absence of a cooperative agreement, OSM.
*TVA-owned lands* means land owned by the United States and entrusted to or managed by the Tennessee Valley Authority.
( b ) The following terms shall have meanings as set forth in 43 CFR parts 3400: Exploration; exploration plan; maximum economic recovery; method of operation; mine; and resource recovery and protection plan.
[48 FR 6935, Feb. 16, 1983, as amended at 48 FR 44779, Sept. 30, 1983]
#### ARLINGTON CO., Appellant, v. COLONIAL ASSUR. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by the Arlington Company against the Colonial Assurance Company.

George Richards, for appellant. W. B. Ellison, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
### **CHAPTER 3029—GRANTS**

Sec.
302901.
Awarding of grants and availability of grant funds.
302902.
Grants to States.
302903.
Grants to National Trust.
302904.
Direct grants for the preservation of properties included on National Register.
302905.
Religious property.
302906.
Grants and loans to Indian tribes and nonprofit organizations representing ethnic or minority groups.
302907.
Grants to Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations.
302908.
Grants to the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau.
302909.
Prohibited use of grant amounts.
302910.
Recordkeeping.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Essaid Mezrioui

*Martin Zeldis,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Timothy J. Sugrue,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided October 30, 1992

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 395, is denied.
# C_2008197EN.01001902.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/19

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 June 2008 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Abril Sánchez and Ricote Saugar (BoomerangTV)

TV

(Case T-420/03) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the Community figurative mark BoomerangTV - Earlier national and Community word and figurative marks BOOMERANG and Boomerang - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention - No damage to reputation - Failure to produce evidence before the Opposition Division of the existence of certain earlier trade marks or translations thereof - Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 8(1)(b) and (2)(c), Article 8(5) and Article 74(2) of Regulation EC No 40/94 - Rule 16(2) and (3), Rule 17(2) and Rule 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

TV

(2008/C 197/32)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Rivas Zurdo and E. López Leiva, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: José Matías Abril Sánchez and Pedro Ricote Saugar (Madrid) (represented by: J.M. Iglesias Monravá, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 October 2003 (Case R 88/2003-2), relating to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés SA, and J.M. Abril Sánchez and P. Ricote Saugar.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders El Corte Inglés SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders El Corte Inglés SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 47, 21.2.2004.

1

---
#### § 875.5 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Reclamation plan* or *State reclamation plan* means a plan that a State or Indian tribe submitted and that we approved under section 405 of SMCRA and part 884 of this chapter.

[73 FR 67640, Nov. 14, 2008]