alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 245 (Monday, December 21, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83077-83078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28102]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Region 4 Library; FRL-10017-91-Region 4]


Notice of Library Changes

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Informational notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing this 
notice to advise the public of upcoming changes to the Region 4 
Library. Region 4 will be reducing the size of its library space, 
decreasing the amount of print materials maintained in its collection, 
and ceasing all on-site library support services. The library will 
retain a small, targeted collection of reference material on-site which 
will be accessible by appointment only to EPA staff and the public (For 
appointments, see contact information below). In addition, EPA staff 
and the public will continue to have remote access to the full suite of 
library services available at EPA through the Andrew W. Breidenbach 
Environmental Research Center (AWBERC) Library, located in Cincinnati, 
Ohio. The AWBERC Library can be reached by email 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#efaca6b0aeb8adaabdacb0a3868d9d8e9d96af8a9f8ec1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cc8f85938d9b8e899e8f9380a5aebeadbeb58ca9bcade2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>) or by phone (513-569-7703). For more 
information about the EPA National Library Network and

[[Page 83078]]

its information resources and services, visit https://www.epa.gov/libraries.

DATES: Region 4's Library changes will be effective February 1, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Region 4 Federal Library Manager, 
Shayla Patillo at (404) 562-8385 or via electronic mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f2f3e2b36333330712c373e26333e1f3a2f3e71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8d8c9dcc1c4c4c786dbc0c9d1c4c9e8cdd8c986cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 14, 2020.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2020-28102 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### **CHAPTER 3125—PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL AND ARCHEOLOGICAL DATA**

Sec.
312501.
Definition.
312502.
Threat of irreparable loss or destruction of significant scientific, prehistorical, historical, or archeological data by Federal construction projects.
312503.
Survey and recovery by Secretary.
312504.
Progress reports by Secretary on surveys and work undertaken as result of surveys.
312505.
Notice of dam construction.
312506.
Administration.
312507.
Assistance to Secretary by Federal agencies responsible for construction projects.
312508.
Costs for identification, surveys, evaluation, and data recovery with respect to historic property.
Very truly yours, 

Michael J. Elméiidorf 11 

President and CEO 

Associated General Contractors of New York State 

A Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America

^^·^z^^^vG^^I^LB'^

Associated General Contractors


of New York State, LLC 

10 Airline Drive, Suite 203


Albany, New York 12205-1025 

518-456-1134 P	518-456-1198 F


www.agcnys.org

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The Honorable Lisa Jackson 

Administrator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Secretary LaHood and Adminstrator .Jackson: 

The Associated General Contractors of New York State, LLC (AGC NYS), New York's 

largest statewide contractor association providing advocacy and education for contractors and 

aiThiated firms, is opposed to the aggressive and unprecedented Federal CAFE (Corporate Average 

Fuel Economy) standards set for the years 2017-2025. The proposed regulations will have a 

decidedly negative effect on many of our nation's businesses and specifically the construction 

industry.

Our members help support and grow the New York's economy by constructing its $30 billion 

annual building, transportation. civil and environmental infrastructure. The need for the power that 

exists in today's light trucks, vans and utility vehicles cannot be supplied with the miles-per-gallon 

this proposal would require without significantly higher costs--and with it a significantly higher cost 

of doing business on an industry already struggling with a treacherous economy and historic levels of 

unemployment. This proposal would pile on new costs that the construction industry simply cannot 

bear.

AGC NYS urges the NHTSA and EPA to reconsider this job-killing proposal and to instead 

pursue policies that more effectively balance environmental concerns with the need for economic 

recovery and job creation.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

**THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS**

**IMCLONE SYSTEMSINCORPORATED:**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3(File Nos. 333-117968, 333-37746, 333-07339, 333-21417,333-39067 and 333-67335) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-38620,333-10275, 033-95894, 333-64825, 333-64827, 333-117995,333-30172, 333-68534 and 333-101492) of ImClone SystemsIncorporated of our reports dated March 1, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of ImClone Systems Incorporated and subsidiary asof December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive income, and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, whichreports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-Kof ImClone Systems Incorporated. Our report on the consolidated financialstatements refers to the Company’s adoption of the provisions of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.”

|                       | **/s/ KPMG LLP** |
|-----------------------|------------------|
| Princeton, New Jersey |             |
| March 1, 2007    |             |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








As the independent registered public accountants of The First Bancorp, Inc., we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-167014) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 11, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of The First Bancorp, Inc.





/s/ Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC


Portland, Maine


December 1, 2015
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 7 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
DAVID K. HOEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. DONALD B. ATKINS; T. BRETT SWAB; TODD W. SINGER; DAN MURDOCK; LAWRENCE A.G. JOHNSON; BROWN J. AKIN, III; LAURIE E. AKIN; J. PETER MESSLER; BRADFORD GRIFFITH,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-5000 (D.C. No. 96-CV-268-E) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BRORBY, LOGAN, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral-2-

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s dismiss al of his complaint alleging defendants are liable under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1961-1968. W e have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm. The district court determined that plaintiff failedto allege interstate effects sufficient to support a RICO claim, as he alleged i n his complaint: “The impact of [defendants’] schemes and activities occurred inOklahoma. The participants in this enterprise are residents of Oklahoma.” See Appellees’ Joint Supp’l App. at 79-80; see also Appellant’s App. at 3; 18 U.S.C. § 1962. We have carefully reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. We a ffirm for substantially the same reasons as those set forth in the district cou rt’s order filed December 6, 1996. AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court
Robert H. Henry Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GREATE BAY CASINO CORPORTION AND
SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000030117
<NAME> GREATE BAY CASINO CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      248
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,717
<PP&E>                                             890
<DEPRECIATION>                                     454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,152
<BONDS>                                         36,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           519
<OTHER-SE>                                   (121,181)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,808
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,203
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (578)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (33)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,036)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,036)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.39)
        

</TABLE>
#### Nat YANISH, Appellant, v. Bruce G. BARBER, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, Appellee.

No. 13785.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 22, 1954.

See, also, 9 Cir., 211 F.2d 467.

Gladstein, Andersen & Leonard, Lloyd E. McMurray, Allan Brotsky, Benjamin Dreyfus, Francis J. McTernan, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Lloyd H. Burke, U. S. Atty., C. Elmer Collett, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HEALY, ORR, and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying and dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It is conceded by appellant that the cause has become moot, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. HALEY v. CAHILL et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 8, 1905.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of William Haley, against Daniel W. Cahill and others.

PER CURIAM.

Writ dismissed upon the merits, with $50 costs and disbursements.

WILLIAMS, J., not sitting.
#### § 1698.4 Confidentiality of advisory opinions and requests for advisory opinions.

Advisory opinions will be confidential except as provided in § 1698.6. Requests for advisory opinions will be confidential except as provided in § 1698.3.
Contacts, With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal been discussed? Organization Person Cohtacted Date Response National Business Aircraft A.ssociation EliCoW 

## LIh;t/1 

# - Regional A.irline Association Davc Lotterer 

## ''1///0'1 

# - Aircraft Owners & Pilol:SAssociation Robert Hackman 

# '-(Mer
ATA Craig Fabian 

# Lflr/lff 

# - ,
#### Thomas H. McGraw et al., Appellants, *v.*Henry Bagley et al., Respondents.

(Argued April 2, 1882;

decided April 11, 1882.)

*Adelbert Moot*for appellants.

*S. O. Peoh*for respondents.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Finoh, J., who takes no part, and Tracy, J., absent.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 108.5 Eligible senior officials of the U.S. government. ( a ) The following individuals are Secretarial Designees for space-available care in MTFs on a reimbursable basis, unless specified otherwise by a Service Secretary: ( 1 ) The President and Vice President, and their spouses and minor children.
( 2 ) Members of Congress.
( 3 ) Members of the Cabinet.
( 4 ) Officials of the Department of Defense appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
( 5 ) Article III Federal Judges. (Article III courts are: The Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. Courts of Appeal, U.S. District Courts, U.S. Court of International Trade, United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review.)
( 6 ) Judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
( 7 ) Assistants to the President.
( 8 ) Director of the White House Military Office.
( 9 ) Former Presidents of the United States and their spouses, widows, and minor children.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 750.15 Coal exploration.

Coal exploration operations on Indian lands shall be conducted in accordance with 25 CFR part 216 and 43 CFR part 3480, whichever is applicable.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                               REPORT ON SCHEDULE
                                       AND
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of  Directors
MAI Systems Corporation

The audits referred to in our report dated March 23, 1999, included the related
financial statement schedule as of December 31, 1997 and 1998, and for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, included in the
annual report on Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in
all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-92194) on Form S-8, of MAI Systems Corporation of our report dated March 23,
1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MAI Systems Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statement of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and all
related schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report
on Form 10-K of MAI Systems Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP
March 23, 1999
PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-F

~ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR : PLATE 7
USGS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY vant Car outa stone sorrel Ued Ses
EXPLANATION 0

é ESTIMATED BLOCK-AVERAGED HEAD—
on measurements from four or more
wells per block

—300— LINE OF EQUAL SIMULATED FRESHWATER
HYDRAULIC HEAD—Interval, in feet, is
variable. Datum is sea level

=== DEPTH-AVERAGED DISSOLVED-SOLIDS
CONCENTRATION—Eaual to 10,000
milligrams per liter

---— - DEPTH-AVERAGED DISSOLVED-SOLIDS o27 £
CONCENTRATION—Eaual to 35,000 (i
milligrams per liter 35°.

—37°

—36°

135°

ARKANSAS

Model boundary

32°

Study area boundary

Edge of Continental Shelf

0 50 100 150 MILES

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
Scale 1:2,500,000 ti) 50 100 = 150 KILOMETERS

PLATE 7E. Estimated block-averaged and simulated 1982 freshwater hydraulic head:
Layer 7, permeable zone E.

By
Alex K. Williamson and Hayes F. Grubb
2001
###### Editorial Note on Part 773

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 54938, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 773 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93323-93325, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 773.16 Performance bond submittal.

If the regulatory authority decides to approve the application, it shall require that the applicant file the performance bond or provide other equivalent guarantee before the permit is issued, in accordance with the provisions of subchapter J of this chapter.

[48 FR 44391, Sept. 28, 1983, as amended at 52 FR 4262, Feb. 10, 1987; 52 FR 17529, May 8, 1987; 53 FR 38890, Oct. 3, 1988; 54 FR 8991, Mar. 2, 1989; 59 FR 54353, Oct. 28, 1994; 60 FR 58491, Nov. 27, 1995; 62 FR 19458, Apr. 21, 1997; 64 FR 70837, Dec. 17, 1999; 65 FR 79663, Dec. 19, 2000. Redesignated at 65 FR 79663, Dec. 19, 2000; 66 FR 16127, Mar. 23, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


     <ARTICLE> 5
     <LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
     FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND
     IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS.
     </LEGEND>
     <MULTIPLIER> 1,000
            
     <S>                             <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
     <PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
     <CASH>                                           2,507
     <SECURITIES>                                         0
     <RECEIVABLES>                                   22,872
     <ALLOWANCES>                                       584
     <INVENTORY>                                     24,091
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,248
     <PP&E>                                          44,488
     <DEPRECIATION>                                  37,956
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,659
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,682
     <BONDS>                                          5,364
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
     <PREFERRED>                                          0
     <COMMON>                                           384
     <OTHER-SE>                                     118,388
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,659
     <SALES>                                         66,228
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,228
     <CGS>                                           49,408
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,408
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  84
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,911)
     <INCOME-TAX>                                      (55)
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,034
     <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
     <CHANGES>                                            0
     <NET-INCOME>                                     4,034
     <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
             

</TABLE>
§ 1800.34 Requests for expedited processing. ( a ) *In general.* All requests will be handled in the order received on a strictly “first-in, first-out” basis. Exceptions to this section will only be made in accordance with the following procedures. In all circumstances, however, and consistent with established judicial precedent, requests more properly the scope of requests under the Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure (or other federal, state, or foreign judicial or quasi-judicial rules) will not be granted expedited processing under this or related (e.g., Privacy Act) provisions unless expressly ordered by a federal court of competent jurisdiction.
( b ) *Procedure.* Requests for expedited processing will be approved only when a compelling need is established to the satisfaction of NACIC. A requester may make such a request with a certification of “compelling need” and, within ten (10) days of receipt, NACIC will decide whether to grant expedited processing and will notify the requester of its decision. The certification shall set forth with specificity the relevant facts upon which the requester relies and it appears to NACIC that substantive records relevant to the stated needs may exist and be deemed releasable. A “compelling need” is deemed to exist: ( 1 ) When the matter involves an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual; or
( 2 ) When the request is made by a person primarily engaged in disseminating information and the information is relevant to a subject of public urgency concerning an actual or alleged Federal government activity.
All data has been removed from this file as a result of CBI sanitization. All data used to develop capital

cost factors as a function of purchased equipment costs is considered CBI or CBI deducible.