alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and income statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             723
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,113
<PP&E>                                             909
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,591
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           679
<OTHER-SE>                                     174,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,316
<SALES>                                         62,153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,153
<CGS>                                           57,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,709)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,709)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
# C_2009180EN.01004201.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/42

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 June 2009 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-257/04) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Transitional measures to be adopted by reason of the accession of new Member States - Regulation (EC) No 1972/2003 laying down measures in respect of trade in agricultural products - Action for annulment - Period within which proceedings must be commenced - Point from which time starts to run - Delay - Amendment of a provision of a regulation - Re-opening of the action against that provision and against all provisions forming a body of rules with it - Partial admissibility - Proportionality - Principle of non-discrimination - Legitimate expectations - Statement of reasons)

2009/C 180/76

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented: initially by J. Pietras, and subsequently by E. Ośniecka-Tamecka, T. Nowakowski, M. Dowgielewicz and B. Majczyna, acting as Agents, assisted by M. Szpunar, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented: initially by A. Stobiecka-Kuik, L. Visaggio and T. van Rijn, and subsequently by T. van Rijn, H. Tserepa-Lacombe and A. Szmytkowska, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Article 3, Article 4(3) and the eighth indent of Article 4(5) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1972/2003 of 10 November 2003 on transitional measures to be adopted in respect of trade in agricultural products on account of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (OJ 2003 L 293, p. 3), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 230/2004 of 10 February 2004 (OJ 2004 L 39, p. 13) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 735/2004 of 20 April 2004 (OJ 2004 L 114, p. 13).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 9.10.2004.

1

---
1

The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-1607

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Jeremy Michael Whitcher, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: July 5, 2011

Filed: July 8, 2011

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver, Jeremy Whitcher

pleaded guilty to making a false claim against the United States in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 287. The district court1

 sentenced him to a 12-month prison term to run

consecutively to his undischarged state sentences. Whitcher appeals. His counsel has

moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

questioning whether the court abused its discretion in imposing a consecutive

sentence.
-2-

We will enforce the appeal waiver. This appeal falls within the scope of the

waiver; Whitcher’s testimony at the plea hearing shows that he entered into both the

plea agreement and the waiver knowingly and voluntarily; and we conclude that

enforcing the waiver will not result in a miscarriage of justice. See United States v.

Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues not covered by the appeal waiver.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and we dismiss the appeal.

______________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0249

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

MAKUEEYAPEE WHITFORD,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Ray Dayton, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 8 2021

09/08/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0249
# C_2008008EN.01000202.xml

| 12.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2007 — Sniace SA v Commission of the European Communities — Republic of Austria, Lenzing Fibers GmbH, Land Burgenland

(Case C-260/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Admissibility - Measure of individual concern to the applicant)

(2008/C 8/03)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Sniace SA (represented by: J. Baró Fuentes, abogado)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Kreuschitz and J.L. Buendía Sierra, Agents), Republic of Austria (represented by: H. Dossi, Agent), Lenzing Fibers GmbH (formerly Lenzing Lyocell GmbH & Co. KG) (represented by U. Soltész, Rechtsanwalt), Land Burgenland (represented by U. Soltész, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber (Extended Composition)) of 14 April 2005 in Case T-88/01 Sniace SA v Commission declaring inadmissible the appellant's action for annulment of Commission Decision 2001/102/EC of 19 July 2000 on State aid granted by Austria to Lenzing Lyocell GmbH & Co. KG (OJ 2001 L 38, p. 33)

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Sniace SA to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sniace SA to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Austria to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Austria to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 6.8.2005.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9920 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9920

    To include sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence in the 
definition of aggravated felonies under the Immigration and Nationality 
   Act in order to expedite the removal of aliens convicted of such 
                                crimes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2024

 Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas (for himself, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. McCaul, 
Mr. Owens, Mr. Duncan, Ms. Mace, Ms. Van Duyne, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Smucker, 
     Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida, Mr. Stauber, and Mr. Feenstra) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To include sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence in the 
definition of aggravated felonies under the Immigration and Nationality 
   Act in order to expedite the removal of aliens convicted of such 
                                crimes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Better Enforcement of Grievous 
Offenses by unNaturalized Emigrants'' or the ``BE GONE Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF AGGRAVATED FELONIES UNDER THE 
              IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT.

    Section 101(a)(43) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1101(a)(43)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (T), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (U), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(V) sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 865.15 Formal adjudicatory proceedings. ( a ) Formal adjudication of a complaint filed under this part shall be conducted in the Office of Hearings and Appeals under 43 CFR part 4.
( b ) A hearing shall be held as promptly as possible consistent with the opportunity for discovery provided for under 43 CFR part 4.
( c ) Upon a finding of violation of § 865.11 of this part, the Secretary shall order the appropriate affirmative relief including, but not limited to, the rehiring or reinstatement of the employee or representative of employees to his former position with compensation. At the request of the employee a sum equal to the aggregate amount of all costs and expenses including attorneys' fees which have been reasonably incurred by the employee for, or in connection with, the institution and prosecution of the proceedings shall be assessed against the person committing the violation.
( d ) On or after 10 days after filing an application for review under this part the Secretary or the employee may seek temporary relief in the Office of Hearings and Appeals under 43 CFR part 4.
##### 



AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE
  Whereas, the Note was originally due to mature on August 1, 2007
(the Maturity Date); andWhereas,Maker has made no payments under the Note to date; andWhereas,Maker and the Holder desire to further extend the Maturity Date;Now Therefore,for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Note as follows:
 1.
    
    The Maturity Date of the Note shall be further extended until January 1, 20092.
    
    To effectuate the foregoing:Section 1 (d) of the Note shall be replaced in its entirety by the following:
 The termMaturity shall mean the date on which this Note shall be due and
payable in full, which date shall be January 1, 2009.
 Section 2 of the Note shall be replaced in its entirety by the following:
 Payment Terms. This Loan shall be effective commencing on the
effective date and continuing until Maturity. The Maker shall be obligated to make
one payment of all outstanding principal and interest due thereon at Maturity.
Unless otherwise designated in writing, mailed or delivered to Maker, the place for
payment of the indebtedness evidenced by this Note shall be the Holders principal
address as noted above. Payments received on this Note shall be applied first to
accrued interest, and the balance to principal.
 3.
    
    Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Note.




---



##### 



4.
    
    Except as amended by this Amendment, the Note shall remain in full force and effect,
enforceable in accordance with its terms and Maker hereby reaffirms and acknowledges
all of its obligations thereunder.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 William W. Rucks, IVSedona CorporationBy:
    Marco Emrich, President -2-
### SUBCHAPTER IV—COURTS-MARTIAL JURISDICTION
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a  14(a)/15d  14(a) Certification

of the Chief Executive Officer



I, James R. Bazet, certify that:



1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |
#### § 942.780 Surface mining permit applications—Minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan.

Part 780 of this chapter, *Surface Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








As the independent registered public accountants of The First Bancorp, Inc., we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-167014) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 13, 2015, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, which report appears in the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 10-K of The First Bancorp, Inc.











/s/ Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC


Portland, Maine


December 1, 2015
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

U.S.C. Section 1350,

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Richard Rochon, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                              
|------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2008            
|                              
|/s/ Richard Rochon            
|Richard Rochon                
|Acting Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
IMCLONE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (File Nos.333-49578,333-22341, 33-95860, 333-37746, 333-07339,
333-21417, 333-39067 and 333-67335) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-38620,
333-10275, 33-95894, 333-64825, 333-64827, 333-30172, 333-68534 and 333-101492)
of ImClone Systems Incorporated of our report dated June 20, 2003, with respect
to the consolidated balance sheets of ImClone Systems Incorporated and
subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which
report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of ImClone
Systems Incorporated. Our report refers to a change in the method of revenue
recognition for certain upfront non-refundable fees in 2000. Also, our report
refers to the Company's restatement of the consolidated financial statements
for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.


                                                  KPMG LLP


Princeton, New Jersey
June 20, 2003
### **CHAPTER 3081—AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD PROTECTION PROGRAM**

Sec.
308101.
Definition.
308102.
Preservation assistance.
308103.
Battlefield acquisition grant program.
308104.
Battlefield interpretation modernization grant program.
308105.
Battlefield restoration grant program.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2019**—Pub. L. 116–94, div. P, title VII, §703(b), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3196, added items 308104 and 308105.
#### § 1803.11 Preliminary information.

Members of the public shall address all communications to the point of contact specified above and clearly delineate the communication as a request under this part. Requests and appeals on requests received from members of the public who owe outstanding fees for information services under this Order or the Freedom of Information Act at this or another federal agency will not be accepted until such debts are resolved.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105

- 2498

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

May 7, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Porsche M eeting with EPA R egarding Proposal for 2017

- 2025 Light

- Duty (LD)

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards

FROM: Robin Moran, Senior Policy Advisor

TO: EPA Docket # EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0799

This memo documents a meeting held on January 10 , 2012 between representatives of Porsche

a nd EPA to discuss Porsche’s comments on the LD GHG proposed rule

. The meeting attendees

included the following:

Porsche : Stephan Schlaef f li, Jeff Gates, Jim Hall (consultant), Rep. Tom Downey (consultant)

EPA : Margo Oge, Chet France, Bill Charmley , Ro bin Moran, Steven Silverman, Christopher

Grundler

Porsche discussed their comments on the proposal, including interest in some form of additional

flexibility in meeting the 2017

- 2025 standards. EPA requested that Porsche submit additional

technical data to further illustrate the leadtime issues they are facing.
### §5907. Effective date

This chapter shall take effect 180 days after the date of enactment of the Intermodal Safe Container Transportation Amendments Act of 1996.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(d), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 862; Pub. L. 104–291, title II, §208(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3457.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5907(a) | 49:508 (note). | Oct. 28, 1992, Pub. L. 102–548, §2(d), 106 Stat. 3649. |
| 5907(b) | 49:508(a)(3) (related to effective date). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "shall initiate a proceeding to issue regulations . . . within 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act" are omitted as executed.

Subsection (b) is substituted for the source provision and made applicable to the entire chapter for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of the Intermodal Safe Container Transportation Amendments Act of 1996, referred to in text, is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 104–291, which was approved Oct. 11, 1996.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–291 substituted "Effective date" for "Regulations and effective date" in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

"(a) Regulations.—Not later than July 25, 1993, the Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe final regulations to enforce this chapter. The Secretary may establish by regulation exemptions to the regulations that are in the public interest and consistent with the purposes of this chapter.

"(b) Effective Date.—This chapter is effective on the date final regulations to enforce this chapter are prescribed."