alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DAILY READING FILE

Message Information Date 07/14/20 1 1 04:46 PM From "Rhoten, Kathleen" <Kathleen.Rhotenlegislature.maine.gov > To <ray.lahooddot.gov >; LisaP Jackson/DC/USEPAIUS@EPA
cc Subject National Fuel Economy Standards Message Body
Good afternoon: The attached is sent per the request of Representative Philip A. Curtis, State of Maine. A hardcopy of the attached letter has been sent to your respective offices.

Kathleen Rhoten Legislative Aide House Republican Office 2 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333-0002 (207) 287-1440 Kathleen. Rhoten@legislature.rnaine.gov

OEX Processing Information Processed Date: Processed By P0 Office Message countPHILIP A. CURTIS

IOU S L MAR) R JY IA DER

[he Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 

# STATE OF MAINE HOUSE OF REPRFSENI'ATIVES HOUSE REPUBLICAN OFFICE AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0002 (207) '57-140 a x (207) 257H149

f) C C U fl's 2 hot ma cow

The Honorable Lisa Jackson Administrator Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Dear Secretary Lailood and Administrator Jackson: As the Majorit y Lmder of the Maine House of Representatives and a highway consultant, lam writing to you about the national fuel economy standards that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Environmental Protection Agency are developing for 2017 to 2025. Serving in both positions provides ne with a clear understanding of the important role that transportation plays in Maine's economy. We are a rural state and rely a great deal on our cars and trucks to keep our families moving and businesses growing. Policies that make transportation more affordable - not more burdensome - are crucial to Maine ñimilies and businesses. This is especially true now as so many struggle to survive these tough economic times. As you focus the attention of your agencies on developing new fuel economy standards, please keep in mind the many Maine people who, along with millions of Americans, live in rural areas and depend on our vehicles to travel each and every day. I ask that you consider adopting a single, national fuel economy standard that allows us to meet our transportation needs without increasing costs and limiting choices for families and businesses. That would be good policy. I appreciate your time and attention to a matter that is crilical to our state affordable transportation. Sincerely

4 Philip A. curtis State Representative

c: honorable Olympia J. Snowe Honorable Susan M. Collins Ilonorable Michael II. Michaud 11onorable Chellie Pingree
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)

**Title:** Simulated hydrologic response to climatechange during the 21st century in New Hampshire

report,Appendices

 
SuDoc:I 19.42/4-4:2018-5009
Item Number:0624-B-02(online)
CGP system Number:001054869
### SUBCHAPTER IV—TEMPORARY ORGANIZATIONS ESTABLISHED BY LAW OR EXECUTIVE ORDER
#### § 948.26 Required abandoned mine land reclamation program/plan amendments. [Reserved]
#### WARD et al., v. SMITH et al. (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Actions by Joseph Ward, Jr., and another against William E. R. Smith and others. No opinion. Motion denied. See memorandum.
# C_2009180EN.01003802.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/38

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 June 2009 — AMGA v Commission

(Case T-300/02) (1)

1

(State aid - Scheme of aid granted by the Italian authorities to certain public utilities in the form of tax exemptions and loans at preferential rates - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Actions for annulment - Not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 180/69

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Azienda Mediterranea Gas e Acqua SpA (AMGA) (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: L. Radicati di Brozolo and M. Merola, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: ASM Brescia SpA (Brescia, Italy) (represented by G. Caia, V. Salvadori, N. Pisani and F. Capelli, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 2003/193/EC of 5 June 2002 on State aid granted by Italy in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding (OJ 2003 L 77, p. 21).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders Azienda Mediterranea Gas e Acqua SpA (AMGA) to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Azienda Mediterranea Gas e Acqua SpA (AMGA) to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the Commission.

| 3. | Orders ASM Brescia SpA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders ASM Brescia SpA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.

1

---
### §606. Effect on other law

The requirements of sections 603 and 604 of this title do not alter in any manner standards otherwise applicable by law to agency action.

(Added Pub. L. 96–354, §3(a), Sept. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 1168.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1981, see section 4 of Pub. L. 96–354, set out as a note under section 601 of this title.
sourceTypeIDroadTypeIDroadTypeVMTFraction 11 1 0.000000 11 2 0.070001 11 3 0.320000 11 4 0.240002 11 5 0.369997 21 1 0.000000 21 2 0.070001 21 3 0.320000 21 4 0.240002 21 5 0.369997 31 1 0.000000 31 2 0.070001 31 3 0.320000 31 4 0.240002 31 5 0.369997 32 1 0.000000 32 2 0.070001 32 3 0.320000 324 0.240002 32 5 0.369997 41 1 0.000000 41 2 0.070001 41 3 0.320000 41 4 0.240002 41 5 0.369997 42 1 0.000000 42 2 0.070001 42 3 0.320000 424 0.240002 42 5 0.369997 43 1 0.000000 432 0.070001 43 3 0.320000 434 0.240002 43 5 0.369997 51 1 0.000000 51 2 0.070001 51 3 0.320000 51 4 0.240002 51 5 0.369997 52 1 0.000000 52 2 0.070001 52 3 0.320000 524 0.240002 52 5 0.369997 53 1 0.000000 532 0.070001 53 3 0.320000 534 0.240002 53 5 0.369997 54 1 0.00000054 2 0.070001 54 3 0.320000 544 0.240002 54 5 0.369997 61 1 0.000000 61 2 0.070001 61 3 0.320000 61 4 0.240002 61 5 0.369997 62 1 0.000000 62 2 0.070001 62 3 0.320000 624 0.240002 62 5 0.369997
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Leonard A. Rosenbaum,  President and Chief Executive Officer of CVD Equipment
Corporation,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2007 of CVD
Equipment  Corporation  (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and the
information  contained  in the Form  10-KSB  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of CVD Equipment
Corporation.


Dated: March 31, 2008            /s/  Leonard A. Rosenbaum
                                 ----------------------------------
                                 Leonard A. Rosenbaum
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 147.10 Guideline H—Drug involvement. ( a ) *The concern.* ( 1 ) Improper or illegal involvement with drugs raises questions regarding an individual's willingness or ability to protect classified information. Drug abuse or dependence may impair social or occupational functioning, increasing the risk of an unauthorized disclosure of classified information.
( 2 ) Drugs are defined as mood and behavior altering substances, and include: ( i ) Drugs, materials, and other chemical compounds identified and listed in the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, as amended (e.g., marijuana or cannabis, depressants, narcotics, stimulants, and hallucinogens),
( ii ) Inhalants and other similar substances.
( 3 ) Drug abuse is the illegal use of a drug or use of a legal drug in a manner that deviates from approved medical direction.
( b ) *Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:* ( 1 ) Any drug abuse (see above definition);
( 2 ) Illegal drug possession, including cultivation, processing, manufacture, purchase, sale, or distribution;
( 3 ) Diagnosis by a credentialed medical professional (e.g., physician, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist) of drug abuse or drug dependence;
( 4 ) Evaluation of drug abuse or drug dependence by a licensed clinical social worker who is a staff member of a recognized drug treatment program;
( 5 ) Failure to successfully complete a drug treatment program prescribed by a credentialed medical professional. Recent drug involvement, especially following the granting of a security clearance, or an expressed intent not to discontinue use, will almost invariably result in an unfavorable determination.
( c ) *Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:* ( 1 ) The drug involvement was not recent;
( 2 ) The drug involvement was an isolated or aberration event;
( 3 ) A demonstrated intent not to abuse any drugs in the future;
( 4 ) Satisfactory completion of a prescribed drug treatment program, including rehabilitation and aftercare requirements, without recurrence of abuse, and a favorable prognosis by a credentialed medical professional.
Exhibit 31.2

I, Craig Hewitt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: October 14, 2003

/s/ Craig Hewitt
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                    SUBSIDIARIES OF HICKORY TECH CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    JURISDICTION OF
            SUBSIDIARIES                                                            INCORPORATION
<S>                                                                                 <C>
Mankato Citizens Telephone Company                                                      Minnesota
Mid-Communications, Inc.                                                                Minnesota
Cable Network, Inc.                                                                     Minnesota
Heartland Telecommunications Company of Iowa, Inc.                                      Minnesota
Amana Colonies Telephone Company                                                        Minnesota
Crystal Communications, Inc.                                                            Minnesota
Minnesota Southern Wireless Company(dba CellularOne)                                    Minnesota
National Independent Billing, Inc.                                                      Minnesota
Collins Communications Systems Co.                                                      Minnesota

</TABLE>

All such subsidiaries are 100% owned by Hickory Tech Corporation. The
financial statements of all such subsidiaries are included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements of Hickory Tech Corporation.

                                       1
### §312305. Reports

As soon as practicable after the end of each fiscal year, the Commission shall transmit to the President a report that includes—

(1) a detailed statement of the activities and accomplishments of the Commission during the fiscal year; and

(2) any recommendations of the Commission for legislation and administrative actions.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3253.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 312305 | 16 U.S.C. 469j(h). | Pub. L. 99–83, title XIII, §1303(h), Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 282. |

Section

The words "and to each House of Congress" are omitted pursuant to section 3003 of the Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note). See the 4th item on page 174 of House Document No. 103–7.
#### § 1602.22 Singular and plural.

Words importing the singular number shall include the plural number, and words importing the plural number shall include the singular, except where the context clearly indicates otherwise.
# C_2008209EN.01004202.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/42

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 July 2008 — AC-Treuhand v Commission

(Case T-99/04) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Organic peroxides - Fines - Article 81 EC - Rights of the defence - Right to a fair hearing - Meaning of perpetrator of an infringement - Principle of nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege - Principle of legal certainty - Legitimate expectations)

nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege

(2008/C 209/72)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: AC-Treuhand AG (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Karl, C. Steinle and J. Drolshammer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Bouquet, Agent, and A. Böhlke, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of Commission decision 2005/349/EC of 10 December 2003 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-2/37.857 — Organic peroxides) (OJ 2005 L 110, p. 44)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders AC-Treuhand AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders AC-Treuhand AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 30.4.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



Statement Pursuant to Section 1350(a) of title 18, United States Code



The undersigned, Peter R. Kann and Christopher W. Vieth, certify that:



|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. (the Company) for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q), which is being
filed today with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ PETER R. KANNPeter R. KannChief Executive Officer,Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Dated: August 3, 2004/S/ CHRISTOPHER W. VIETHChristopher W. ViethChief Financial Officer,Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Dated: August 3, 2004
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

April 1, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00086

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Y.G.B., A CHILD,

From the 285th Judicial District C ourt, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 00166 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On January 21, 2014, the trial court signed an order terminating Appellant’s rights to his child Y.G.B. On February 4, 201 4, Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. On February 7, 2014, court

- appointed counsel Joe K. Bohac also filed a notice of appeal.
On March 26, 2014, Appellant filed a letter asking this court for help with his appeal. Appellant has court

- appointed co unsel to assist him with his appeal. C ounsel’s contact information is as follows:

The Law Office of Joe K. Bohac 111 Soledad Street, Suite 300 San Antonio, Texas 78205 210

- 308

- 0600 210

- 308

- 0678 (Fax) joe@bohac.ne t

_______________________________ __ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 1st day of April, 2014

.

_______________________________ ____ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 4.32

                                STATE OF DELAWARE

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                                   AWNA TRUST

            This Certificate of Trust of AWNA Trust, dated as of November 25,
2002 ("Certificate of Trust"), is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
to form a statutory trust in accordance with the provisions of the Delaware
Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et seq.). This Certificate of Trust
sets forth the following:

            1. Name. The name of the statutory trust is "AWNA Trust."

            2. Delaware Trustee. The name and address of the Delaware trustee
with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware is U.S. Bank Trust
National Association, 300 W. Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware
19809-1515.

            3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective at
the time of its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

            4. Counterparts. This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or
more counterparts.
<PAGE>
            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all the trustees of the
trust at the time of filing of this Certificate of Trust, have executed this
Certificate of Trust as of the date first written above.

                                    U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not
                                    in its individual capacity, but solely as
                                    trustee of the trust


                                    By:_________________________________________
                                         Name:
                                         Title:


                                    U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its
                                    individual capacity, but solely as trustee
                                    of the trust


                                    By:_________________________________________
                                         Name:
                                         Title:
<PAGE>
                                    THOMAS P. MARTIN, not in his individual
                                    capacity, but solely as trustee of the trust


                                    By:_________________________________________
                                          Name: Thomas P. Martin
#### § 583.105 What is the purpose of this part and to whom does it apply?

The regulations in this part provide procedures for entering into negotiated noncompetitive agreements for the use of OCS sand, gravel, and/or shell resources. The rules of this part apply exclusively to negotiated noncompetitive use of OCS sand, gravel, and/or shell resources and do not apply to competitive leasing of minerals, including oil, gas, sulphur, geopressured-geothermal and associated resources, and all other minerals that are authorized by an Act of Congress to be produced from “public lands” as defined in section 103 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended (43 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*).