alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9203. Agency policies; complaint procedures

The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall—

(1) develop, implement, and publish a policy to assist employees of agencies in complying with section 9202 and the regulations issued pursuant to such section; and

(2) establish and publish procedures under which an applicant for an appointment to a position in the civil service may submit a complaint, or any other information, relating to compliance by an employee of an agency with section 9202.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XI, §1122(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1606.)
### SUBCHAPTER III—AWARD TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE CAPABILITIES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–378, §2(20), Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1348, substituted "OFFICERS" for "OFFICER".
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1156 

Expressing support for the designation of April 17, 2025, as ‘‘Cambodian 

Genocide Remembrance Day’’ to remember the horrific slaughter of 

almost 2,000,000 Cambodian people at the hand of the Khmer Rouge 

regime. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2024 

Mrs. TRAHAN (for herself, Mr. ROBERT GARCIA of California, and Mr. SMITH

of New Jersey) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of April 17, 2025, 

as ‘‘Cambodian Genocide Remembrance Day’’ to remember the horrific slaughter of almost 2,000,000 Cambodian people at the hand of the Khmer Rouge regime. 

Whereas, April 17th, 1975, marked the fall of Phnom Penh 

to the Khmer Rouge, thereby marking the beginning of 

the Cambodian Genocide; 

Whereas, beginning on April 17, 1975, and for the next 4 

years, almost 2,000,000 Cambodian people were starved, 

tortured, and murdered under the direct orders of the 

Khmer Rouge regime and their leader Pol Pot; 

Whereas nearly one fourth of the population of Cambodia at 

the time were killed during the genocide; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1156 IH 

Whereas, April 17th, 2025, marks the 50th anniversary of 

the beginning of the Cambodian Genocide; 

Whereas by designating April 17th as a day of remembrance, 

the utmost respect and reverence can be given to the lives 

that were lost; 

Whereas recognizing this day serves to honor those who survived the genocide with the utmost admiration; 

Whereas Cambodian communities have found new beginnings 

across the United States, acting as a symbol of resiliency 

and strength; 

Whereas, in 2019, the cities of Lowell, Los Angeles, and 

Long Beach proclaimed April 17th to be Cambodian 

Genocide Remembrance Day; and 

Whereas, in 2023, the State of Massachusetts proclaimed 

April 17th to be Cambodian Genocide Remembrance 

Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the principles and values of ‘‘Cam3 bodian Genocide Remembrance Day’’; 

4 (2) acknowledges the long and continued strug5 gle of the Cambodian people to foster a free and just 

6 democratic process; 

7 (3) further acknowledges the work of the Cam8 bodian diaspora community throughout the United 

9 States to gain recognition of the Cambodian Geno10 cide by the Federal Government; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1156 IH 

1 (4) encourages all to reflect on the history of 

2 the Cambodian Genocide and the legacy that it has 

3 left, both within Cambodia and abroad; and 

4 (5) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling upon the people of the United States 

6 to observe such a day with appropriate ceremonies 

7 and activities. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1130 

Supporting the designation of April 2024 as the ‘‘Month of the Military 

Child’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2024 

Mrs. RODGERS of Washington (for herself and Mr. BISHOP of Georgia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of April 2024 as the ‘‘Month 

of the Military Child’’. 

Whereas thousands of brave Americans have demonstrated 

their courage and commitment to freedom by serving the 

Armed Forces of the United States of America in activeduty posts around the world; 

Whereas there are more than 1,560,000 children connected to 

the military across the United States; 

Whereas it is only fitting that we take time to recognize their 

contributions, celebrate their spirit, and let our men and 

women in uniform know that while they are taking care 

of us, we are taking care of their children and youth; 

Whereas the recognition of a ‘‘Month of the Military Child’’ 

will allow us to pay tribute to military children and youth 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1130 IH 

for their commitment, their struggles, and their unconditional support of our troops because when someone joins 

the military, it’s a family commitment to our country, 

military children are heroes in their own way; and 

Whereas a monthlong salute to military children and youth 

will encourage our country to provide direct support to 

military children and families: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports a ‘‘Month of the Military Child’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) urges all citizens, business, and government 

5 leaders to observe the month with appropriate cere6 monies and activities that honor, support, and show 

7 appreciation for military children. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 921.817 Performance standards—underground mining activities.

Part 817 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Underground Mining Activities,* shall apply to any person who conducts underground coal mining operations.
#### In the Matter of Albert Shelton, an Attorney. Denis M. Hurley, Petitioner; Albert Shelton, Respondent.

Motion by petitioner to confirm the Referee’s report finding the respondent guilty of the charges and recommending that he be disbarred. Motion granted; report confirmed; respondent disbarred and his name struck from the roll of attorneys and counsellors at law, effective 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD BERNARD,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74526

Agency No. A071-781-322

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Richard Bernard, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for suspension of deportation

as a battered spouse, and denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction

FILED

MAR 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-74526

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

determinations, Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 345 F.3d 824, 832 (9th Cir. 2003), and for

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037,

1039 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Bernard failed to

establish he was battered or subject to extreme cruelty by his former spouse. See

8 U.S.C. § 1254(a)(3) (repealed 1996); cf. Hernandez, 345 F.3d at 840-41. 

 The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Bernard’s motion to

reopen, because his new evidence addressed only hardship resulting from removal

and did not address the dispositive finding that Bernard failed to show he had been

subjected to extreme cruelty or battery, and he therefore could not establish prima

facie eligibility for suspension of deportation as a battered spouse. See Singh, 295

F.3d at 1039 (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is

“arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### §3330e. Review of official personnel file of former Federal employees before rehiring

(a) If a former Government employee is a candidate for a position within the competitive service or the excepted service, prior to making any determination with respect to the appointment or reinstatement of such employee to such position, the appointing authority shall review and consider merit-based information relating to such employee's former period or periods of service such as official personnel actions, employee performance ratings, and disciplinary actions, if any, in such employee's official personnel record file.

(b) In subsection (a), the term "former Government employee" means an individual whose most recent position with the Government prior to becoming a candidate as described under subsection (a) was within the competitive service or the excepted service.

(c) The Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations to carry out the purpose of this section. Such regulations may not contain provisions that would increase the time required for agency hiring actions.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XI, §1136(a), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2460.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XI, §1136(b), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2460, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [enacting this section] shall apply to any former Government employee (as described in section 3330e of title 5, United States Code, as added by such subsection) appointed or reinstated on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2016]."
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 19

- 10085 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:16

- cr - 00404

- EAK

- JSS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus

JARVIS RODRICK THOMAS , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (September 10, 2019) Before WILSON , WILLIAM PRYOR and HULL , Ci rcuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 19-10085 Date Filed: 09/10/2019 Page: 1 of 22 Thomas Burns , appointed counsel for Jarvis Thomas in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of t he relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Thomas ’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

. Further, Thomas’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT

.

Case: 19-10085 Date Filed: 09/10/2019 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         171,848
<SECURITIES>                                   691,686
<RECEIVABLES>                                  148,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,012,479
<PP&E>                                       3,953,972
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,493,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,566,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       388,062
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,917,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,566,875
<SALES>                                        517,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               537,674
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  488,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,983
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,010
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,243
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1126 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1126

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 10, 2024.
    Resolved, That the Speaker, in concurrence with the Minority Leader, is 
authorized to direct the Chief Administrative Officer to record proceedings 
during a joint meeting of Congress on April 11, 2024, to provide a virtual 
reality experience for educational use by the public.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### §4511. Definition and general provisions

(a) For purposes of this subchapter, the term "agency" means any Executive agency.

(b) A cash award under this subchapter is in addition to the regular pay of the recipient. Acceptance of a cash award under this subchapter constitutes an agreement that the use by the Government of an idea, method, or device for which the award is made does not form the basis of a further claim of any nature against the Government by the employee, his heirs, or assigns.

(Added Pub. L. 97–35, title XVII, §1703(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 755.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 1703(c) of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 4501 of this title.

#### Authority To Make Awards

Pub. L. 102–487, §1(c), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3134, provided that: "Awards may be made under subchapter II of chapter 45 of title 5, United States Code, on and after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 24, 1992]."
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Kehoe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of MS Structured Asset Corp.
on behalf of SATURNS Trust No. 2002-12;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National
Association and its officers and agents.



                                                   By: /s/ John Kehoe
                                                      ----------------------
                                                   Name:  John Kehoe
                                                   Title: Vice President
                                                   Date:  February 27, 2004
### §102711. Authority of Secretary to use applicable appropriations for the System to render assistance to nearby law enforcement and fire prevention agencies and for related activities outside the System

To facilitate the administration of the System, the Secretary may use applicable appropriations for the System to render emergency rescue, firefighting, and cooperative assistance to nearby law enforcement and fire prevention agencies and for related purposes outside the System.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3162.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 102711 | 16 U.S.C. 1b (matter before (1)), (1). | Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 384, §1 (matter before (1)), (1), 67 Stat. 495; Pub. L. 91–383, §2(a), Aug. 18, 1970, 84 Stat. 826. |

Section

The words "and he may use applicable appropriations for the aforesaid system for the following purposes" are retained because the appropriation is to be used for something outside the System.
## Subtitle II—Outdoor Recreation Programs
### **CHAPTER 313—HEALTHCARE**

Sec.
31301.
Healthcare program.
31302.
Astronaut healthcare survey.
This directory contains Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry News Notes from February 2009 - December 2010. For its predecessor title Northeastern Area News Notes see http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps55676/. For Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry April 2011 through to present see: http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo39906
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule containst summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part II, Item 8. of this Form 10-K and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         250,209
<SECURITIES>                                   443,067
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               763,977
<PP&E>                                           3,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,063,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,447
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,649
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,010,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,063,919
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               227,902
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,403
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,443
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

RE: Docket Number 2022 -CA -1193

Advanced Benefit Concepts, Inc. 

Versus - - 

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Access Health, Inc. 

Preferred Care Services, Inc. 

On Application for Rehearing filed on

Rehearing

19th Judicial District Court

Case #: 709719

East Baton Rouge Parish

by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, et al

Mitchell R. Theriot

7 k - 

Wayne Ray Chutz

Chris Hester

A11C O A 9fl') Q
### §573. Neutrals

(a) A neutral may be a permanent or temporary officer or employee of the Federal Government or any other individual who is acceptable to the parties to a dispute resolution proceeding. A neutral shall have no official, financial, or personal conflict of interest with respect to the issues in controversy, unless such interest is fully disclosed in writing to all parties and all parties agree that the neutral may serve.

(b) A neutral who serves as a conciliator, facilitator, or mediator serves at the will of the parties.

(c) The President shall designate an agency or designate or establish an interagency committee to facilitate and encourage agency use of dispute resolution under this subchapter. Such agency or interagency committee, in consultation with other appropriate Federal agencies and professional organizations experienced in matters concerning dispute resolution, shall—

(1) encourage and facilitate agency use of alternative means of dispute resolution; and

(2) develop procedures that permit agencies to obtain the services of neutrals on an expedited basis.

(d) An agency may use the services of one or more employees of other agencies to serve as neutrals in dispute resolution proceedings. The agencies may enter into an interagency agreement that provides for the reimbursement by the user agency or the parties of the full or partial cost of the services of such an employee.

(e) Any agency may enter into a contract with any person for services as a neutral, or for training in connection with alternative means of dispute resolution. The parties in a dispute resolution proceeding shall agree on compensation for the neutral that is fair and reasonable to the Government.

(Added Pub. L. 101–552, §4(b), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2739, §583; renumbered §573, Pub. L. 102–354, §3(b)(2), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 944; amended Pub. L. 104–320, §7(b), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3872.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 573 of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees, was transferred to section 2258 of Title 7, Agriculture.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 573 was renumbered section 593 of this title.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–320, §7(b)(1), added subsec. (c) and struck out former subsec. (c) which related to power of Administrative Conference of the United States to establish and utilize standards for neutrals and to enter into contracts for services of neutrals.

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 104–320, §7(b)(2), struck out "on a roster established under subsection (c)(2) or a roster maintained by other public or private organizations, or individual" after "contract with any person".

1992—Pub. L. 102–354 renumbered section 583 of this title as this section.