alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**OF      ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB/A**

**OF      SIONIX CORPORATION**

**FOR      THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007**

|   | (a) | Amendment                no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September                30, 2007 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section                13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | Information                contained in amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB                fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results                of                operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ___________,                2008 | /s/                James                J. HoutzChief                Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                                                                   |
| ___________,                2008 | /s/Rodney                AndersonChief                Financial Officer                |

----
### §13102. Administration of provisions

(a) In General.—The provisions of this subchapter shall be administered by—

(1) the Director of the Office of Government Ethics, the designated agency ethics official, or the Secretary concerned, as appropriate, with regard to officers and employees described in paragraphs (1) through (8) of section 13103(f) of this title;

(2) the Select Committee on Ethics of the Senate and the Committee on Ethics of the House of Representatives, as appropriate, with regard to officers and employees described in paragraphs (9) and (10) of section 13103(f) of this title; and

(3) the Judicial Conference in the case of an officer or employee described in paragraphs (11) and (12) of section 13103(f) of this title.

(b) Delegation by Judicial Conference.—The Judicial Conference may delegate any authority it has under this subchapter to an ethics committee established by the Judicial Conference.

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(c), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4270.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 13102 | 5 U.S.C. App. (EGA §111) | Pub. L. 95–521, title I, §111, as added Pub. L. 101–194, title II, §202, Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1744; amended Pub. L. 101–280, §3(1), (9), May 4, 1990, 104 Stat. 152, 157. |

Section

In subsection (a)(2), the words "Committee on Ethics of the House of Representatives" are substituted for "Committee on Standards of Official Conduct of the House of Representatives" because of House Resolution No. 5, 112th Congress, January 5, 2011.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transmittal of Financial Disclosure Reports

Pub. L. 101–194, title IX, §902, Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1780, as amended by Pub. L. 117–286, §4(c)(17), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4356, provided that:

"(a) The Select Committee on Ethics shall transmit a copy of each report filed with it under subchapter I of chapter 131 of title 5, United States Code, (other than a report filed by a Member of Congress) to the head of the employing office of the individual filing the report.

"(b) For purposes of this section, the head of the employing office shall be—

"(A) in the case of an employee of a Member, the Member by whom that person is employed;

"(B) in the case of an employee of a Committee, the chairman and ranking minority member of such Committee;

"(C) in the case of an employee on the leadership staff, the Member of the leadership on whose staff such person serves; and

"(D) in the case of any other employee of the legislative branch, the head of the office in which such individual serves."
#### § 179.1 Purpose.

The Department of Defense (the Department) is adopting this Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) (hereinafter referred to as the “rule”) under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2710(b). Provisions of 10 U.S.C. 2710(b) require that the Department assign to each defense site in the inventory required by 10 U.S.C. 2710(a) a relative priority for response activities based on the overall conditions at each location and taking into consideration various factors related to safety and environmental hazards.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS TO
COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
(In thousands, except ratios)
(Unaudited)
  Year Ended December 312007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Fixed charges
    
    $
    275,648
    
    
    $
    235,521
    
    
    $
    106,909
    
    
    $
    44,939
    
    
    $
    58,924Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,259
    
    
    
    20,273Combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    295,904
    
    
    $
    255,777
    
    
    $
    127,165
    
    
    $
    65,198
    
    
    $
    79,197Fixed charges
    
    $
    275,648
    
    
    $
    235,521
    
    
    $
    106,909
    
    
    $
    44,939
    
    
    $
    58,924Income from continuing
operations
    
    
    24,713
    
    
    
    3,843
    
    
    
    17,195
    
    
    
    39,869
    
    
    
    58,666$
    300,361
    
    
    $
    239,364
    
    
    $
    124,104
    
    
    $
    84,808
    
    
    $
    117,590Ratio of income from continuing
operations to combined
fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends
    
    
    1.02:1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.30:1
    
    
    
    1.48:1Deficiency of income from
continuing operations (before
fixed charges) to combined fixed
charges and preferred stock
dividends
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    16,413
    
    
    $
    3,061
§ 77.1004 Ground control; inspection and maintenance; general. ( a ) Highwalls, banks, benches, and terrain sloping into the working areas shall be examined after every rain, freeze, or thaw before men work in such areas, and such examination shall be made and recorded in accordance with § 77.1713.
( b ) Overhanging highwalls and banks shall be taken down and other unsafe ground conditions shall be corrected promptly, or the area shall be posted.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 6-K

                            REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER
                      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                           For the month of April 2004

                          (Commission File No. 1-14728)

                                 Lan Chile S.A.
                  (Translation of registrant's name in English)

                        Avenida Americo Vespucio Sur 901
                                     Renca,
                                 Santiago, Chile
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)


    (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
                 reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.)

                               Form 20-F  X  Form 40-F
                                         ---          ---

        (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
        information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the
       information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
                        Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)

                                  Yes       No   X
                                      ---       ---


<PAGE>

                                    LANCHILE


                                  MATERIAL FACT


Santiago, April 21, 2004


Mr. Alejandro Ferreiro Yazigi
Superintendent of Banking and Insurance
Present



To whom it may concern:

In compliance with Articles 9 and 10, Second Subsection, of Law 18.045, we are
informing you that Lan Chile S.A. is beginning the initial phases of negotiation
for a possible acquisition of shares in the Argentine airline operating company,
American Falcon S.A.

Said negotiations only constitute the beginning of a formal period of legal,
financial, accounting, tax and pension-related diligence of American Falcon; to
date there does not exist any agreement as to a possible acquisition nor with
respect to any specific conditions of the same. Even though the size of the
transaction does not constitute a material fact, it has been decided to make
this information public given the consequences that it could have in the market.


Sincerely,



Alejandro de la Fuente Goic
Vice President of Finance
Lan Chile S.A.


cc.   Bolsa de Comercio de Santiago
      Bolsa de Corredores de Valparaiso
      Bolsa Electronica de Chile

<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date:  April 22, 2004



                                  Lan Chile S.A.

                                  /s/ Alejandro de la Fuente Goic
                                  -------------------------------
                                  By: Alejandro de la Fuente Goic
                                      Chief Financial Officer
### §101322. Management development and training

The Secretary shall maintain a clear plan for management training and development under which career professional Service employees from any appropriate academic field may obtain sufficient training, experience, and advancement opportunity to enable those qualified to move into System unit management positions, including the position of superintendent of a System unit.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3126.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101322 | 16 U.S.C. 5913. | Pub. L. 105–391, title I, §103, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3498. |

Section

The word "maintain" is substituted for "Within 2 years after November 13, 1998 . . . develop" to eliminate obsolete words.
#### ENNIS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 6, 1903.)

Action by Matthew Ennis against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### Salvatore J. Porto, Respondent, v Yoel Blum et al., Appellants.

[833 NYS2d 245]

*615In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damages, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rivera, J.), dated September 29, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the defendants.

The defendants’ evidence, which consisted of the affirmed medical report of their examining neurologist and the plaintiffs bill of particulars, was sufficient to establish, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]; *Yakubov v CG Trans Corp.,*30 AD3d 509 [2006]; *Bell v Rameau,*29 AD3d 839 [2006]; *Collins v Stone,*8 AD3d 321 [2004]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury. The affidavit of his treating physician failed to note any range of motion limitations in the plaintiffs left shoulder and lumbar spine that resulted from the subject accident *(see Ramirez v Parache,*31 AD3d 415, 416 [2006]; *Ranzie v Abdul-Massih,*28 AD3d 447, 448 [2006]; *Li v Woo Sung Yun,*27 AD3d 624, 625 [2006]). Furthermore, the plaintiff’s physician improperly relied upon the unsworn magnetic resonance imaging report of another physician *(see Felix v New York City Tr. Auth.,*32 AD3d 527, 528 [2006]; *Baksh v Shabi,*32 AD3d 525 [2006]; *Vishnevsky v Glassberg,*29 AD3d 680, 681 [2006]), and failed to set forth the objective medical tests utilized at his most recent examination of the plaintiff that led him to determine that the plaintiff sustained limitations of motion in his left shoulder *(see Cardillo v Xenakis,*31 AD3d 683, 684 [2006]; *Springer v Arthurs,*22 AD3d 829, 830 [2005]; *Nelson v Amicizia,*21 AD3d 1015, 1016 [2005]). Although the plaintiffs bill of particulars does not raise this particular issue, we note that his complaint alleged that he had been unable to attend to his regular duties. Nevertheless, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he was prevented from performing substantially all of his usual activities for at least 90 of the first 180 days following the subject accident *(see Ranzie v Abdul-Massih, supra*at 448-449).

*616The Supreme Court, however, properly denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action to recover property damages *(see Pajda v Pedone,*303 AD2d 729, 730 [2003]; *McCauley v Ross,*298 AD2d 506, 507 [2002]; *Yaraghi v Zeller,*286 AD2d 765 [2001]). Crane, J.P., Santucci, Florio, Dillon and Balkin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certification of the

Chief Executive Officer



I, James R. Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the Form 10-Q)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.



/s/ James R. BazetJames R. BazetAugust 12, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GPS Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to GPS Industries, Inc. and
will be retained by GPS Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

       Date: November 20, 2006               By:/s/ MICHAEL MARTIN
                                              --------------------------
                                              Michael Martin
                                              Chief Accounting Officer
                                              (Duly Authorized Officer)
#### Robert H. Graham vs. City of Minneapolis and others.

May 7, 1889.

Demurrer — Defect of Parties. — A demurrer for defect of parties *held*properly sustained, where the complaint shows on its face that a third party named owns the claim the payment of which by the defendant the plaintiff seeks to enjoin

Appeal by plaintiff from an order df the district court for Hennepin county, *Iiea,*J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, in an action against the city, its mayor, clerk, comptroller and treasurer.

*437*Corrigan & Braclish,*for appellant.

*Robert D. Russell,*for respondents.

Vanderburgh, J.1

One of the grounds of the demurrer to the complaint is that there is a defect of parties defendant, and it was sustained by the trial court on that ground. The complaint shows that a certificate of indebtedness, to the amount of $1,000, being for money advanced for grading certain streets in the Ninth ward of the city, was issued by the treasurer and countersigned by the comptroller, in pursuance of certain resolutions of the city council, and this certificate or obligation is now held by one De Motte-as a claim against the city, to be charged in account against the Ninth ward funds. The plaintiff alleges that on the 10th day of September, 1887, the certificate was, for value received, assigned to De Motte, and that he is now the owner and holder thereof, and the .same is wholly unpaid; and, by reason of the further allegations appearing in the complaint, he insists that the claim is invalid, and'asks the- equitable aid of the court-in restraining and enjoining the city from taking any steps to provide for the payment of the same.

The objection on the ground of defect of parties is required by the statute to be taken by demurrer or answer, and is preliminary to a trial on the merits, to the end that all the parties whose presence is necessary to a complete and final determination of the controversy may be brought in. *Wallace*v. *Eaton, 5*How. Pr. 99. In equity practice, before the Code, the general rule was that you must have before the court all whose interests the decree may touch, because they are concerned to resist the demand, and in order to avoid the necessity of trying the case in halves. *Wiser*v. *Blachly,*1 John. Ch. 437. And “the decree should settle the rights of all parties interested in the subject-matter of the suit, so that the performance of the decree may be perfectly safe to those who are compelled to obey it, and also that future litigation may be prevented.” Story, Eq. Pl. § 72. In this case it is clear that De Motte is spécially interested in the controversy touching the validity of the claim, and is entitled to be heard upon that matter. And the defendant is also interested in be*438ing protected from future litigation. But a judgment against it alone would not bindDeMotte or end the controversy. *Fish*v. *Berkey,*10 Minn. 161, (199, 204.) The ease is within the rule. The objection was well taken, and the demurrer properly sustained.

Order affirmed.

1

 Gilfilian, C.. J., waa absent, and took no part in this decision.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in theevent that publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. (Historical purposes)

**Title:** Quantitative Assessments of SpectrumUsage

Report,Appendices

 
SuDoc:C 60.2:SP 3/2
Item Number:0126-E-04 (online)
CGP system Number:001054087
Final EIS Appendix F 

Wyoming Greater Sage-Grouse Land Use Plan Amendment F-1 

APPENDIX F—PREDATOR MANAGEMENT 

F.1 INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, Forest Service (Forest Service) will implement strategies and techniques in land management 

decisions that minimize the threat predators pose to sage-grouse. The land management agencies will also 

support and encourage other landowners and agencies in their efforts to minimize impacts from predators 

on sage-grouse where needs have been documented. 

F.2 REQUIRED DESIGN FEATURES RELATIVE TO SAGE-GROUSE 

PREDATORS IN LAND MANAGEMENT DECISIONS

Project proponents are encouraged to include all appropriate conservation measures in their proposals. 

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service) will require 

application of all appropriate conservation measures, warranted by site-specific analysis, in order to 

avoid, minimize, rectify, reduce, or compensate for impacts. Conservation measures not included in 

project proposals and determined appropriate from the site-specific analysis will be required as 

Conditions of Approval (COAs), stipulations, terms and conditions, etcetera. Additional COAs developed 

through consultation with other federal, state, and local regulatory and resource agencies may be applied 

when supported by site-specific analysis. 

Required Design Features include but are not limited to the following: 

• Prohibit open dumps.

• Require appropriate disposal of animal carcasses. 

• Construct or modify vertical structures in a manner that prevents nesting or perching by 

scavengers or raptors. 

• Require raptor perch deterrents on power poles as a component of permit issuance or renewal 

according to Avian Power Line Interaction Committee (APLIC) 2012 standards (APLIC 2012. 

Suggested Practices for Raptor Protection on Power Lines and Mitigating Bird Collisions with 

Power Lines. http://aplic.org).

• Remove vertical structures, such as utility poles, buildings, or windmills, where feasible and 

where these structures are either no longer necessary or operational. 

• Minimize creation of new roads. 

• Remove roads, unimproved roads, and two-tracks in core sage-grouse habitats according to travel 

management plans and restore sagebrush habitat. 

• Dispose of all garbage in containers that cannot be opened by animals. 

• Inventory and monitor predator populations by project proponents. 

• Identify and replace operational windmills with solar pumps. 
Appendix F Final EIS 

F-2 Wyoming Greater Sage-Grouse Land Use Plan Amendment 

This page intentionally left blank.