alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael J. Hoffman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|/s/    MICHAEL J. HOFFMAN                               
|Michael J. Hoffman President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                        
|November 9, 2004
§ 1908.34 Establishment of appeals structure. ( a ) *In general.* Two administrative entities have been established by the Director of Central Intelligence to facilitate the processing of administrative appeals under the mandatory declassification review provisions of this Order. Their membership, authority, and rules of procedure are as follows.
( b ) *Historical Records Policy Board (“HRPB” or “Board”).* This Board, the successor to the CIA Information Review Committee, acts as the senior corporate board in the CIA on all matters of information review and release. It is composed of the Executive Director, who serves as its Chair, the Deputy Director for Administration, the Deputy Director for Intelligence, the Deputy Director for Operations, the Deputy Director for Science and Technology, the General Counsel, the Director of Congressional Affairs, the Director of the Public Affairs Staff, the Director, Center for the Study of Intelligence, and the Associate Deputy Director for Administration/Information Services, or their designees. The Board, by majority vote, may delegate to one or more of its members the authority to act on any appeal or other matter or authorize the Chair to delegate such authority, as long as such delegation is not to the same individual or body who made the initial denial. The Executive Secretary of the HRPB is the Director, Information Management. The Chair may request interested parties to participate when special equities or expertise are involved.
( c ) *Agency Release Panel (“ARP” or “Panel”).* The HRPB, pursuant to its delegation of authority, has established a subordinate Agency Release Panel. This Panel is composed of the Director, Information Management, who serves as its Chair; the Information Review Officers from the Directorates of Administration, Intelligence, Operations, Science and Technology, and the Director of Central Intelligence Area; the CIA Information and Privacy Coordinator; the Chief, Historical Review Group; the Chair, Publications Review Board; the Chief, Records Declassification Program; and representatives from the Offices of General Counsel and Congressional Affairs, and the Public Affairs Staff. The Information and Privacy Coordinator also serves as the Executive Secretary of the Panel. The Panel advises and assists the HRPB on all information release issues, monitors the adequacy and timeliness of Agency releases, sets component search and review priorities, reviews adequacy of resources available to and planning for all Agency release programs, and performs such other functions as deemed necessary by the Board. The Chair may request interested parties to participate when special equities or expertise are involved. The Panel, functioning as a committee of the whole or through individual members, will make final Agency decisions from appeals of initial denial decisions under E.O. 12958. Issues not resolved by the Panel will be referred by the Panel to the HRPB. Matters decided by the Panel or Board will be deemed a final decision by the Agency.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:30 a.m., Tuesday, January 12, 2021.

# PLACE: 

Virtual.

# STATUS: 

The one item may be viewed by the public through webcast only.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

                    64964—Pipeline Investigation Report                    *—*                    Atmos Energy Corporation Natural Gas-Fueled Explosion, Dallas, Texas, February 23, 2018                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Candi Bing at (202) 590-8384 or by email at                         *bingc@ntsb.gov.*

                        Media Information Contact: Keith Holloway by email at                         *keith.holloway@ntsb.gov*                         or at (202) 314-6100.                    

                        This meeting will take place virtually. The public may view it through a live                               ( print page 83629)                            or archived webcast by accessing a link under “Webcast of Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

                        There may be changes to this event due to the evolving situation concerning the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also available at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

The National Transportation Safety Board is holding this meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b).

Dated: Friday, December 18, 2020.

Candi R. Bing,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2020-28405 Filed 12-18-20; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
### SUBCHAPTER V—FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE
### §564. Publication of notice; applications for membership on committees

(a) Publication of Notice.—If, after considering the report of a convener or conducting its own assessment, an agency decides to establish a negotiated rulemaking committee, the agency shall publish in the Federal Register and, as appropriate, in trade or other specialized publications, a notice which shall include—

(1) an announcement that the agency intends to establish a negotiated rulemaking committee to negotiate and develop a proposed rule;

(2) a description of the subject and scope of the rule to be developed, and the issues to be considered;

(3) a list of the interests which are likely to be significantly affected by the rule;

(4) a list of the persons proposed to represent such interests and the person or persons proposed to represent the agency;

(5) a proposed agenda and schedule for completing the work of the committee, including a target date for publication by the agency of a proposed rule for notice and comment;

(6) a description of administrative support for the committee to be provided by the agency, including technical assistance;

(7) a solicitation for comments on the proposal to establish the committee, and the proposed membership of the negotiated rulemaking committee; and

(8) an explanation of how a person may apply or nominate another person for membership on the committee, as provided under subsection (b).

(b) Applications for Membership or 1 Committee.—Persons who will be significantly affected by a proposed rule and who believe that their interests will not be adequately represented by any person specified in a notice under subsection (a)(4) may apply for, or nominate another person for, membership on the negotiated rulemaking committee to represent such interests with respect to the proposed rule. Each application or nomination shall include—

(1) the name of the applicant or nominee and a description of the interests such person shall represent;

(2) evidence that the applicant or nominee is authorized to represent parties related to the interests the person proposes to represent;

(3) a written commitment that the applicant or nominee shall actively participate in good faith in the development of the rule under consideration; and

(4) the reasons that the persons specified in the notice under subsection (a)(4) do not adequately represent the interests of the person submitting the application or nomination.

(c) Period for Submission of Comments and Applications.—The agency shall provide for a period of at least 30 calendar days for the submission of comments and applications under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 101–648, §3(a), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4971, §584; renumbered §564, Pub. L. 102–354, §3(a)(2), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–354 renumbered section 584 of this title as this section.

1 So in original. Probably should be "on".
# C_2008272EN.01001502.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/15

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-381/04) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Animal subsidies and rural development - Inadequate national management and control system)

(2008/C 272/27)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: M.Fiorilli, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C.Cattabriga and L.Visaggio, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2004/561/EC of 16 July excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ L 250, p. 21), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic in the sectors of animal subsidies and rural development.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 6.11.2004.

1

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Meltech Corp., Inc. 

Under Contract No. N40080-12-D-1012 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61892 

Leonard A. Sacks, Esq. 

Leonard A. Sacks & Associates, P.C. 

Rockville, MD 

Craig D. Jensen, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Matthew S. Hawkins, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: March 28, 2019 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61892, Appeal of Mel tech Corp., Inc., 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.513-1 Electric conductor; size.

An electric conductor is not of sufficient size to have adequate carrying capacity if it is smaller than is provided for in the National Electric Code, 1968. In addition, equipment and trailing cables that are required to be permissible must meet the requirements of the appropriate schedules of the Bureau of Mines.
### [§24104. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title XI, §11202(c)(2), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1630]

Section, Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 902; Pub. L. 105–134, title III, §301(a), Dec. 2, 1997, 111 Stat. 2585, authorized certain appropriations for the benefit of Amtrak.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal by Pub. L. 114–94 effective Oct. 1, 2015, see section 1003 of Pub. L. 114–94, set out as an Effective Date of 2015 Amendment note under section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Reform Board

Pub. L. 105–134, title IV, §411(b), Dec. 2, 1997, 111 Stat. 2589, provided that provisions authorizing certain appropriations shall cease to be effective if the Reform Board had not assumed the responsibilities of the Board of Directors of Amtrak before July 1, 1998.
### §3005. Department of Defense

Except to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter or other provisions of law, the provisions of title 5 shall be applicable to the Department of Defense.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §201, as added Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXVII, §6742(b)(6), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, 61 Stat. 495, known as the National Security Act of 1947, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section 6742(b)(6) of Pub. L. 116–92, which directed the general amendment of section 201 of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was executed by adding a new section 201 to the Act and classifying it to this section, in light of the repeal of former section 201 by Pub. L. 87–651, §307, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 526.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3005, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §201(d), as added Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, §4, 63 Stat. 579, which applied the provisions of title 4 of the Revised Statutes to the Department of Defense, except to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter, was technically repealed by Pub. L. 87–651, §307, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 526, but continued to be set out as this section prior to the enactment of Pub. L. 116–92.

A prior section 201 of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, as added Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, §4, 63 Stat. 579, which established the Department of Defense as an Executive Department and established within it the various military departments, consisted of subsecs. (a) and (b), classified to section 171 of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees; subsec. (c), classified to section 1 of former Title 5; and subsec. (d), classified first to section 171–1 of former Title 5, then to section 408 of this title, and finally to this section (see note above). Section 201 was repealed by Pub. L. 87–651, §307, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 526.
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

ROW Exclusion Areas

ROW Avoidance Areas

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Sage-grouse Priority/Core Habitat Areas

Sage-grouse Connectivity Habitat Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2-10: Alternative B

ROW Exclusion 

and Avoidance Areas
§ 1636.4 Basis for classification in Class 1-0. ( a ) A registrant must be conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form and conscientiously opposed to participation in both combatant and noncombatant training and service in the Armed Forces.
( b ) A registrant's objection may be founded on religious training and belief; it may be based on strictly religious beliefs, or on personal beliefs that are purely ethical or moral in source or centent and occupy in the life of a registrant a place parallel to that filled by belief in a Supreme Being for those holding more traditionally religious views.
( c ) A registrant's objection must be sincere.
#### The Shear Company, appellee, v. James R. Baker & Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,254.

Action for breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Edward I). Shurtleff, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 9, 1925.

Rehearing denied March 23, 1925.

Tenney, Harding, Sherman *So*Rogers, for appellant.

Levinson,

Becker, Schwartz & Frank, for appellee; Marshall Solbcrg, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 244 (Friday, December 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 82565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27846]



[[Page 82565]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11280]


Designation of Ashraf al-Qizani as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 
1(a)(ii)(B) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended 
by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order 13284 of 
January 23, 2003, and Executive Order 13886 of September 9, 2019, I 
hereby determine that the person known as Ashraf al-Qizani, also known 
as Ashraf al-Gizani, also known as Abu `Ubaydah al-Kafi, also known as 
Achref Ben Fethi Ben Mabrouk Guizani, also known as Achraf Ben Fathi 
Ben Mabrouk Guizani, is a foreign person who is a leader of leader of 
Jund al-Khilafah in Tunisia (JAK-T), a group whose property and 
interests in property are blocked pursuant to a prior determination by 
the Secretary of State pursuant to Executive Order 13224.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 27, 2020.
Michael R. Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2020-27846 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
NORT 

®ISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 

FRED R, NORTON, JR. 

Board Certified In Tax Law and 

Estate Planning & Probate Law 

Texas Board of Legal Specialization 

MARSHALL C. WOOD 

Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law 

Texas Board of Legal Specialization 

315 Main Street 

Post Office Box 1808 

Texarkana, Texas 75504-1808 

Telephone: 903.823.1321 

Facsimile: 903.8231325 

www.nottanandwood.coin 

CORY J. FLOYD 

CAMMY R. KENNEDY 

April 9, 2015 

Clerk, 6th District Court of Appeals 

Bi-State Justice Building, No. 20 

100 N. State Line Avenue 

Texarkana, Texas 75501 

Re: William H. Scurlock v. John M. Hubbard 

Cause No. 06-15-00014-CV; 6thCOA, Texas, Texarkana Division 

Dear Madam: 

This letter will serve to advise that my client, Appellant William H. Scurlock, 

intends to file a response and objection to Appellee's Motion for Extension of Time to 

File Appellant's Brief. I would respectfully ask the Court to delay its ruling on said 

Motion until such time as our response has been received and considered by the Court. 

Thank you in advance for your courtesy and assistance with respect to this 

matter. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact 

me. 

Bes- e7r18,7\ 

Cory . loyd 

cc: Brent M. Langdon (via email transmission) 

Kyle B. Davis (via email transmission) 

CJF/ri 2079-001 

Solving problems. Seizing opportunities, 

ACCEPTED

06-15-00014-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

4/9/2015 12:27:54 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/9/2015 12:27:54 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
### §40703. Research alignment

In addition to pursuing the research and development initiative described in section 40702 of this title, the Administrator shall, to the maximum extent practicable within available funding, align the fundamental aeronautics research program to address high priority technology challenges of the National Academies' Decadal Survey of Civil Aeronautics, and shall work to increase the degree of involvement of external organizations, and especially of universities, in the fundamental aeronautics research program.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3390.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40703 | 42 U.S.C. 17722. | Pub. L. 110–422, title III, §303, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4787. |

Section
#### Sarah Slater v. Phyllis Margolin et al., Doing Business as Middletown Auto School.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before February 2, 1961, with notice of argument for February 14,1961, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.