alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
                        JOINT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trident Rowan Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark S.
Hauser, Joint Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                          /s/ Mark S. Hauser
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Mark S. Hauser
                                          Joint Chief Executive Officer
                                          May 25, 2004
Clinical Guide > Oral Health

# Guide for HIV/AIDS Clinical CareSection 9: Oral Health- Oral Health
- Oral Ulceration
- Oral Warts
- Oral Hairy Leukoplakia
- Necrotizing Ulcerative Periodontitis and Gingivitis
7 

Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-0165 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NE-02-AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Do not include oncondition costs here 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours 

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up) 

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our) 

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts) 

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet 

Remove FADEC 

S/W version B175 

or earlier

1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 40 $3,400.00

Remove FADEC 

S/W version C065 

or earlier

1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 40 $3,400.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $6,800 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup) 

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour) 

Parts Cost Cost per Product 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 
8

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2372

JERRY A. HURST, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; MARTY A. 

HARBIN, in his individual and representative capacity; DAVID 

L. JONES, in his individual and representative capacity; 

MARSHALL MAJOR, in his individual and representative 

capacity; JOHN D. MCGAVIN, in his individual and 

representative capacity, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District 

Judge. (1:08-cv-02907-WMN) 

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 29, 2009 

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.*

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

 *

 The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006). 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Jerry A. Hurst appeals from the district court’s order 

dismissing his complaint against State Farm Mutual Automobile 

Insurance Company and its agents as barred by res judicata. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Hurst v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 1:08-cv02907-WMN (D. Md. Nov 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Surface Disturbance Restricted

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Sage-grouse Priority/Core Habitat Areas

Sage-grouse Connectivity Habitat Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2-2: Alternative D

Greater Sage-Grouse Surface 

Disturbance/Surface

Occupancy Restrictions
EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

         Each of the undersigned officers and/or directors of Techdyne, Inc., a
Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby appoints Barry J. Pardon and David
L. Watts as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, or either one of them
individually with power to act without the other, as his or her true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, in his or her name and on his or her behalf, and in any and
all capacities stated below, to sign and to cause to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments thereto,
hereby granting unto said attorneys, and to each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any
and all such capacities, every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done in
and about the premises as fully as each of the undersigned could or might do in
person, hereby granting to each such attorney full power of substitution and
revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney or his substitute
may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of
Attorney in counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 27, 2003.

<table>
<caption>
          Signature                                             Title
          ---------                                             -----

                                        <C>
/s/ Samuel Russell                         Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
------------------------------------       Executive Officer
Samuel Russell

/s/ Barry J. Pardon                        President and Director
------------------------------------       (principal executive officer)
Barry J. Pardon

/s/ John Ian Durie                         Vice President - Finance and Director
------------------------------------
John Ian Durie

/s/ David L. Watts                         Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
------------------------------------       (principal financial and principal accounting officer)
David L. Watts

/s/ James A Clark                          Director
------------------------------------
James A. Clark

/s/ Christina Margaret Janet Russell       Director
------------------------------------
Christina Margaret Janet Russell

/s/ Thomas Foggo                           Director
------------------------------------
Thomas Foggo

/s/ Kenneth Greenhalgh                     Director
------------------------------------
Kenneth Greenhalgh
</table>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       3,954,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               68,475,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,769,000
<INVENTORY>                                 71,758,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           157,777,000
<PP&E>                                      85,456,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,827,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             238,476,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      100,169,000
<BONDS>                                      5,666,000
<COMMON>                                        43,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,407,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               238,476,000
<SALES>                                    347,914,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           347,914,000
<CGS>                                      299,927,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              299,927,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             7,200,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,430,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (641,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   632,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,273,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,273,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.30)


        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 1350 Certificationof the**

**Chief Executive Officer**

 

I,James R. Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation,certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CobraElectronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009(the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporationand its subsidiaries.

 

 
|   | /s/  James R. Bazet     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | James  R. Bazet         |
|   | November 12,  2009 |
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

Assigned on Briefs March 05, 2014

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JIMMY GRIFFIN, JR.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County

No. 1323 Donald H. Allen, Judge

No. W2013-01774-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 20, 2014

THOMAS T. WOODALL, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which sets aside the

order of restitution and remands for another hearing. I disagree that this is an appropriate

case to observe “plain error” and would accordingly affirm the judgment of the trial court.

___________________________________

THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE
Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-130055, 033-54959, 033-60005, 333-88786, 333-98913, 333-98915 and 333-109863 on Form
S-8 of our report dated March 18, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Longs Drug Stores Corporation and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of Longs Drug Stores Corporation and subsidiaries internal control over
financial reporting (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of new accounting pronouncements), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Longs Drug Stores Corporation for
the year ended January 31, 2008.



|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         

March 18, 2008
# C_2009019EN.01002401.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/24

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 December 2008 — Karatzoglou v EAR

(Case T-471/04) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Temporary staff - Referral back to the Court of First Instance after setting aside - Termination of contract - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Misuse of powers - Principle of sound administration)

(2009/C 19/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Georgios Karatzoglou (Préveza, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) (represented by: S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the EAR of 26 February 2004 to terminate the applicant's contract of employment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Georgios Karatzoglou and the European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) each to bear their own costs incurred before the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Georgios Karatzoglou and the European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) each to bear their own costs incurred before the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 57, 5.3.2005.

1

---
#### § 1704.6 Exceptions.

MDR requests will not be accepted from a foreign government entity or any representative thereof. MDR requests will not be accepted for documents required to be submitted for prepublication review or other administrative process pursuant to an approved nondisclosure agreement; for information that is the subject of pending litigation; nor for any document or material containing information from within an operational file exempted from search and review, publication, and disclosure under the FOIA. If the ODNI has reviewed the requested information for declassification within the past two years, the ODNI will not conduct another review, but the D/IMD will notify the requester of this fact and the prior review decision. Requests will not be accepted from requesters who have outstanding fees for MDR or FOIA requests with the ODNI or another federal agency.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, A. P. Kimble, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 16,
2005



/s/    A. P. KimbleA. P. Kimble Vice President, Treasurer andChief Financial and Accounting Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Jessie E. Barnes, Respondent, v. Willie Barnes, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present-—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT RICHARDSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 418 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
§ 1656.12 Job reassignment. ( a ) *Grounds for Reassignment.* The Director may reassign an ASW whenever the Director determines that: ( 1 ) The job assignment violates the ASW's religious, moral or ethical beliefs or convictions as to participation in a war that led to his classification as a conscientious objector or violates § 1656.5(a) of this part.
( 2 ) An ASW experiences a change in his mental or physical condition which renders him unfit or unable to continue performing satisfactorily in his assigned job;
( 3 ) An ASW's dependents incur a hardship which is not so severe as to justify a suspension of the Order to Perform Alternative Service under § 1656.15;
( 4 ) The ASW's employer ceases to operate an approved program or activity;
( 5 ) The ASW's employer fails to comply with terms and conditions of these regulations or;
( 6 ) Continual and severe differences between the ASW's employer and ASW remain unresolved.
( 7 ) The sanctions authorized in § 1656.11 should be applied.
( b ) *Who May Request Reassignment.* Any ASW may request reassignment to another job. An employer may request job reassignment of an ASW who is in his employ.
( c ) *Method for Obtaining a Reassignment.* All requests for reassignment must be in writing with the reasons specified. The request may be filed with the ASO of jurisdiction at any time during an ASW's alternative service employment. An ASW must continue in his assigned job, if available, until the request for assignment is approved.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     38,019
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,648
<PP&E>                                           6,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          124,456
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              670
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,372
<SALES>                                        424,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               424,708
<CGS>                                          401,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  401,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (33,609)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (33,609)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (33,609)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.76)
        

</TABLE>