[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 23, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 83804-83816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

19 CFR Part 361

[Docket No. 201014-0270]
RIN 0625-AB18


Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis System

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this final rule, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
adopts the Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis (AIM) system by 
promulgating new regulations that establish a website for the AIM 
system that consists of an online aluminum import license application 
platform and public AIM monitor; require importers, customs brokers or 
their agents to apply for and obtain an import license for each entry 
of certain aluminum products into the United States through the AIM 
system website; require license applicants to identify, among other 
requirements, the country or countries where the largest and the second 
largest volume of primary aluminum used in the manufacture of the 
imported aluminum product was smelted (subject to certain exceptions) 
and the country where the aluminum product was most recently cast; 
allow for the public release of certain import license data on an 
aggregate basis, as appropriate, on the public AIM monitor; and apply 
the license requirement to all imports of basic aluminum products. 
Further, Commerce is adopting the aluminum import license application 
form in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). Lastly, 
Commerce is notifying parties that, after the AIM system is in place, 
Commerce will seek additional comment from parties on potential 
improvements or changes to the system in a subsequent notice.

DATES: 
    Effective date: January 25, 2021.
    Applicability date: The AIM system website will be operational on 
January 4, 2021. Therefore, potential license applicants will be able 
to obtain their user identification numbers and apply for licenses 
beginning on January 4, 2021. Licenses will be required for all covered 
aluminum imports on or after January 25, 2021. For further information 
regarding a one-year delay for portions of the final rule, see 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The new AIM system website that will be operational on 
January 4, 2021 is https://www.trade.gov/aluminum. Through this 
website, potential license applicants can register for the online 
license application platform and apply for licenses. Additionally, the 
public AIM monitor is also featured on this website.
    More information can be found at https://www.trade.gov/aluminum. 
Commerce is offering a virtual demonstration of the online license 
application platform for potential license applicants. Commerce is also 
offering a virtual demonstration of the public AIM monitor, which is 
available to the general public. Although the demonstrations will be 
completely virtual, Commerce will have a limited number of spots 
available for participation in the demonstrations, that will occur 
prior to the effective date of this rule. For specific dates and times 
of the demonstrations, and to participate in the demonstrations, please 
visit https://www.trade.gov/aluminum.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Julie Al-Saadawi at (202) 482-1930, 
Brandon Custard at (202) 482-1823, or Jessica Link at (202) 482-1411.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 17, 2019, the United States announced joint understandings 
with Canada and Mexico, respectively, concerning trade in aluminum 
covered by the action taken pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade 
Expansion Act of 1962, as amended. Among other things, the 
understandings call for the monitoring of aluminum trade between the 
United States and Canada and Mexico, respectively. Consistent with the 
joint understandings, and to enhance U.S. Government monitoring and 
analysis of aluminum products more generally, Commerce published a 
proposed rule on April 29, 2020 to establish the AIM system. The goal 
of the AIM system is to allow for the effective and timely monitoring 
of import surges of specific aluminum products and to aid in the 
prevention of transshipment of aluminum products. Over the past two 
decades, Commerce has operated the similar recently updated Steel 
Import Monitoring and Analysis (SIMA) system that allows for the 
effective and timely monitoring of import surges of specific steel 
products, and aids in the prevention of transshipment of steel 
products.

Modeling the AIM System on the SIMA System

    To the extent practicable, the AIM System will operate in a similar 
manner as the SIMA system, which has been operating under its current 
authority

[[Page 83805]]

since March 11, 2005.\1\ The purpose of the SIMA system is to provide 
steel producers, steel consumers, importers, and the general public 
with accurate and timely information on anticipated imports of certain 
steel products into the United States. Steel import licenses, issued 
through the online SIMA licensing system, are required by U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection (CBP or Customs) for filing entry summary 
documentation, or its electronic equivalent, for imports of certain 
steel mill products into the United States. Through the monitoring 
tool, certain import data collected from the licenses are aggregated 
weekly and reported on the publicly available SIMA website, https://www.trade.gov/steel. This tool provides valuable data regarding U.S. 
imports of certain steel mill imports, as early as possible, and makes 
such data available to the public up to eight weeks in advance of 
official U.S. import statistics issued by the U.S. Census Bureau 
(Census).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System, Final Rule, 
70 FR 72373 (December 5, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 232 Tariff on Imports of Aluminum Into the United States

    On January 19, 2018, pursuant to section 232 of the Trade Expansion 
Act of 1962 (the Trade Expansion Act), as amended (19 U.S.C. 1862), the 
Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) transmitted to the President a report 
on his investigation into the effect of imports of aluminum articles on 
the national security of the United States.\2\ The Secretary found and 
advised the President that aluminum articles were being imported into 
the United States in such quantities and under such circumstances as to 
threaten to impair the national security of the United States.\3\ In 
Presidential Proclamation 9704 of March 8, 2018 (Adjusting Imports of 
Aluminum Into the United States) (Proclamation 9704), the President 
concurred with the Secretary's findings and decided to adjust the 
imports of aluminum articles, as defined in clause 1 of Proclamation 
9704, by imposing a 10 percent ad valorem tariff on such articles 
imported from most countries.\4\ Between March 2018 and August 2020, 
the President made several additional adjustments to the imports of 
aluminum articles.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See The Effect of Imports of Aluminum on the National 
Security: An Investigation Conducted Under Section 232 of the Trade 
Expansion Act of 1962, As Amended, U.S. Department of Commerce 
Report, dated January 11, 2018 (https://www.commerce.gov/files/effect-imports-aluminum-national-security-investigation-conducted-under-section-232-trade).
    \3\ Id.
    \4\ Adjusting Imports of Aluminum Into the United States, 
Proclamation 9704, 83 FR 11619, 11620 (March 15, 2018) (Presidential 
Proclamation 9704).
    \5\ See Adjusting Imports of Aluminum Into the United States, 
Proclamation 9710, 83 FR 13355 (March 22, 2018) (Presidential 
Proclamation 9710); Adjusting Imports of Aluminum Into the United 
States, Proclamation 9739, 83 FR 20677 (April 30, 2018) 
(Presidential Proclamation 9739); Adjusting Imports of Aluminum Into 
the United States, Proclamation 9758, 83 FR 25849 (May 31, 2018) 
(Presidential Proclamation 9758); Adjusting Imports of Aluminum Into 
the United States, Proclamation 9776, 83 FR 45019 (August 28, 2018) 
(Presidential Proclamation 9776); Adjusting Imports of Derivative 
Aluminum Articles and Derivative Steel Articles into the United 
States, Proclamation 9980, 85 FR 5281 (January 24, 2020) 
(Presidential Proclamation 9980); and Adjusting Imports of Aluminum 
Articles Into United States, Proclamation 10060, 85 FR 49921 (August 
14, 2020) (Presidential Proclamation 10060).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result, effective March 23, 2018, certain aluminum imports 
were subject to Section 232 tariffs, and imports from Canada and Mexico 
were exempted from these tariffs. With respect to Canada and Mexico, 
Proclamation 9704 provided that the United States would continue 
ongoing discussions with these countries and exempt aluminum imports 
from these countries from Section 232 tariffs.\6\ Further, Proclamation 
9704 stated that Canada and Mexico would be expected to take action to 
prevent transshipment of aluminum imports through these countries to 
the United States.\7\ Subsequently, Presidential Proclamation 9758 of 
May 31, 2018 (Adjusting Imports of Aluminum into the United States) 
(Proclamation 9758) removed the exemption for aluminum imports from 
Canada and Mexico, and imposed Section 232 duties on aluminum imports 
from these countries, effective June 1, 2018.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Presidential Proclamation 9704, 83 FR at 11620.
    \7\ Id.
    \8\ See Presidential Proclamation 9758, 83 FR at 25850.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 17, 2019, the United States announced that discussions had 
yielded joint understandings with Canada and Mexico, respectively, to 
remove the Section 232 tariffs for aluminum imports from those 
countries.\9\ As part of the joint understandings, the United States 
and Canada, and the United States and Mexico, agreed to implement 
effective measures to prevent the transshipment of aluminum products 
made outside of the United States, Canada, and Mexico, among other 
commitments. Additionally, the joint understandings provide that the 
countries will establish an agreed-upon process for monitoring aluminum 
trade between them. In light of the joint understandings, Presidential 
Proclamation 9893 of May 19, 2019 (Adjusting Imports of Aluminum into 
the United States) (Proclamation 9893) provided that a satisfactory 
alternative means had been agreed upon and, effective May 21, 2019, 
aluminum imports from Canada and Mexico would not be subject to Section 
232 tariffs.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Joint Statement by the United States and Canada on 
Section 232 Duties on Steel and Aluminum, dated May 17, 2019, 
available at https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Joint_Statement_by_the_United_States_and_Canada.pdf; Joint Statement 
by the United States and Mexico on Section 232 Duties on Steel and 
Aluminum, dated May 17, 2019, available at https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Joint_Statement_by_the_United_States_and_Mexico.pdf.
    \10\ See Adjusting Imports of Aluminum into the United States, 
Proclamation 9893, 84 FR 23983 (May 19, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Rule

    On April 29, 2020, Commerce published a proposal for the 
establishment of the AIM system in 19 CFR part 361.\11\ Commerce 
received 17 comments on the Proposed Rule, and we have addressed those 
comments below. The Proposed Rule, comments received, and this final 
rule can be accessed using the Federal eRulemaking portal at http://www.regulations.gov/. After analyzing and considering the comments 
received, we are adopting regulations to establish the AIM system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis System Proposed 
Rule, 85 FR 23748 (April 29, 2020) (Proposed Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Explanation of Regulatory Provisions and Changes From the Proposed Rule

    Pursuant to its authority under the Census Act, as amended (the 
Census Act) (13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 302), and consistent with the joint 
understandings, Commerce is establishing a system of import licensing 
to facilitate the monitoring of imports of aluminum articles, including 
monitoring for import surges, known as the AIM system. Commerce has 
thus proposed a rule and received comments regarding the establishment 
of the AIM system. The AIM system will operate in a similar way as the 
existing SIMA system (19 CFR part 360) and will be codified under 19 
CFR part 361. Also, Commerce recently incorporated minor changes into 
its regulations for the SIMA system.\12\ The AIM system tracks the 
modified SIMA system as closely as possible except where necessary to 
address the inherent differences between steel and aluminum imports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Steel Import 
Monitoring and Analysis System, 85 FR 56162 (September 11, 2020) 
(SIMA Modification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The responsibility for issuing these regulations is delegated to 
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

[[Page 83806]]

    The AIM system is based entirely on a web-based platform at https://www.trade.gov/aluminum and is comprised of the online registration 
system, automatic aluminum import license issuance system, and aluminum 
import monitor. As addressed in further detail below, for purposes of 
importing basic aluminum products,\13\ any importer, importing company, 
customs broker or importer's agent of basic aluminum products must (1) 
register and obtain a username, (2) file for and obtain a unique 
aluminum import license (issued automatically) for each shipment, and 
(3) provide the license number to CBP as part of the submission of the 
entry summary form, Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent. As 
discussed below, aluminum imports valued under $5,000 per shipment may 
obtain a multi-use low-value license. Additionally, informal entries 
are exempt from the licensing requirement.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The AIM system will cover basic aluminum products under the 
following HTS codes: 7601, 7604, 7605, 7606, 7607, 7608, 7609, 
7616.99.51.60, and 7616.99.51.70. As discussed in 19 CFR 
361.101(a)(1), a list of the products covered by the AIM system by 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes can be obtained on the AIM 
system website. The HTS codes, which are maintained by the U.S. 
International Trade Commission (ITC), may be updated periodically to 
reflect revisions to the codes.
    \14\ See 19 CFR 143.21 through 143.28 for further information on 
informal entries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The public AIM monitor, described further below, will aggregate and 
report certain information obtained from the aluminum licenses on a 
monthly basis and will be refreshed each week, as appropriate. 
Additionally, outdated license information will be replaced, where 
available, with publicly available U.S. import statistics. Like the 
public SIMA monitor, the public AIM monitor will function as an early 
warning system, yielding public data up to eight weeks prior to the 
release of publicly available import statistics by Census.

Online Registration System and Automatic Aluminum Import License 
Issuance System

    Similar to the SIMA system, the AIM system will include both an 
online registration system and an automatic aluminum import license 
issuance system, as provided in 19 CFR 361.101-103. Section 361.102, 
covering the online registration system, provides that in order to 
obtain an aluminum import license, any importer, importing company, 
customs broker or the importer's agent must first register with 
Commerce and obtain a username to log into the automatic aluminum 
import license issuance system. Although a primary username will be 
issued to an importing company or brokerage house, all operating units 
within the company (e.g., individual branches, divisions or employees) 
may have separate usernames associated with different email addresses 
that will be associated with the parent company. The AIM system will be 
designed to allow multiple users of a single Employer Identification 
Number (EIN) from different locations within the company to enter 
information simultaneously.
    There is no fee to register (see Sec.  361.106), and a username 
will be issued immediately if all registration fields are completed. As 
part of the registration process, the importer, importing company, 
customs broker, or importer's agent will be required to provide certain 
general information, including the applicant company name, EIN or the 
CBP-issued importer number (where no EIN is available), address, phone 
number, and email address for both the company's headquarters and any 
branch offices that will be applying for aluminum licenses. This 
information will be used solely for the purposes of administering the 
aluminum import licensing and monitoring programs. The information will 
not be released by Commerce, except as required by U.S. law.
    Section 361.103, covering the automatic issuance of import 
licenses, provides that aluminum import licenses will be issued to 
registered importers, customs brokers, or their agents through an 
automatic aluminum import licensing system. The separately issued 
username discussed above will be required to apply for the import 
license. There will be no fee charged to apply for the import licenses 
(see Sec.  361.106). Like steel import licenses, aluminum import 
licenses will be issued automatically after the completion of all 
fields on the application form. In order to obtain the license, the 
applicant (also referred to as the filer) must report the information 
identified under Sec.  361.103(c)(1) in the fields of the license 
application form. Certain fields will be generated automatically in the 
license form from the information in the registration system. Other 
information will be available from drop down lists in the application 
form (e.g., aluminum HTS numbers, country of origin, country of smelt, 
port of entry) and will not have to be typed.
    Much of the information requested on the license form is readily 
available to the importer or its broker and is similar to the 
information required by CBP for purposes of the entry summary. For 
certain fields, the information requested is not already required by 
CBP. Specifically, in the Proposed Rule Commerce proposed a field to 
reflect the country where the primary aluminum used in the manufacture 
of the imported aluminum product was smelted and poured. However, based 
on comments, and as discussed further below, in this final rule 
Commerce has altered this requirement. As stated in Sec.  
361.103(c)(1)(xiii), (xiv), and (xv), Commerce requires the applicant 
to provide information in three separate fields: (1) The country where 
the largest volume of primary aluminum used in the manufacture of the 
imported aluminum product was smelted (referred to as ``country of 
smelt for the largest volume of primary aluminum'' as shorthand), (2) 
the country where the second largest volume of primary aluminum used in 
the manufacture of the imported aluminum product was smelted (referred 
to as ``country of smelt for the second largest volume of primary 
aluminum'' as shorthand), and (3) the country where the aluminum used 
in the imported aluminum product was most recently cast (referred to as 
``country of most recent cast'' for shorthand). These fields are 
further described under Sec.  361.103(c)(3). The reference to ``pour'' 
and ``poured'' is removed from the final rule.
    Section 361.103(c)(3)(i)(A) defines the field for the country of 
smelt for the largest volume of primary aluminum as the country where 
the largest volume of new aluminum metal is produced from alumina (or 
aluminum oxide) by the electrolytic Hall-H[eacute]roult process.\15\ 
Section 361.103(c)(3)(i)(B) provides that filers may state ``not 
applicable'' in this field if the product contains only secondary 
aluminum and no primary aluminum. Secondary aluminum is defined as 
aluminum metal that is produced from recycled aluminum scrap through a 
re-melting process.\16\ Additionally, recognizing that importers may 
have some initial difficulties in securing this information,

[[Page 83807]]

Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(i)(C) allows filers to state ``unknown'' for this 
field on the license application on a temporary basis. Specifically, 
``unknown'' may be stated for a period of one year from the publication 
of the final rule (i.e., up to December 23, 2021) to allow license 
applicants sufficient time to gather the requisite information. 
Effective December 24, 2021, filers will no longer be able to state 
``unknown'' and then will be required to provide the requested 
information for this field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ As discussed further below, this definition is directly 
responsive to the comments raised on the Proposed Rule as well as 
third-party sources, such as the discussion of primary aluminum 
production featured on the website of the Aluminum Association 
(available at https://www.aluminum.org/industries/production/primary-production). This discussion demonstrates that there is a 
well-understood and generally accepted description of the primary 
aluminum production process in the aluminum industry that allows 
Commerce to adopt the definitions in this final rule.
    \16\ As discussed further below, this definition takes into 
account comments on the Proposed Rule as well as third-party 
sources, such as the discussion of secondary aluminum production 
featured on the website of the Aluminum Association (available at 
https://www.aluminum.org/industries/production/secondary-production).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similar to the country of smelt for the largest volume of primary 
aluminum field, Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(ii)(A) defines the field for the 
country of smelt for the second largest volume of primary aluminum as 
the country where the second largest volume of new aluminum metal is 
produced from alumina (or aluminum oxide) by the electrolytic Hall-
H[eacute]roult process. Section 361.103(c)(3)(ii)(B) also provides that 
filers may state ``not applicable'' in this field if the product 
contains only secondary aluminum and no primary aluminum. Additionally, 
filers may state ``not applicable'' in this field if the product does 
not contain a second largest volume of primary aluminum. Further, 
filers will be allowed to state ``unknown'' in this field for a period 
of one year from the publication of the final rule (i.e., up to 
December 23, 2021) for the reasons stated above. Effective December 24, 
2021, filers will no longer be able to state ``unknown'' and then will 
be required to provide the requested information for this field.
    Section 361.103(c)(3)(iii)(A) defines the field for the country of 
most recent cast as the country where the aluminum (with or without 
alloying elements) was last liquified by heat and cast into a solid 
state. The final solid state can take the form of either a semi-
finished product (slab, billets or ingots) or a finished aluminum 
product.\17\ Unlike the two fields described above, section 
361.103(c)(3)(iii)(B) and (C) provide that filers will not be allowed 
to state ``not applicable'' or ``unknown'' for this field. As discussed 
further below, the country of most recent cast is information that 
generally is readily available to the importer or its broker and is 
most likely to be identified in the import documentation accompanying 
the entry summary to be filed with CBP (invoices, lab reports, etc.). 
In some instances, the country of most recent cast may be identified as 
the country of origin. Further, because a semi-finished or finished 
aluminum product could go through the casting process multiple times 
before importation into the United States, the field only requests the 
country of most recent cast.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ As discussed further below, this definition takes into 
account comments on the Proposed Rule as well as third-party 
sources, such as the discussion of aluminum processing featured on 
the website of the Aluminum Association (available at https://www.aluminum.org/industries/processing).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A sample copy of the aluminum import license and the accompanying 
instructions will be available for viewing on Enforcement and 
Compliance's website (https://www.trade.gov/aluminum/). Upon completion 
of the application form, the importer, customs broker or the importer's 
agent will certify as to the accuracy and completeness of the 
information and submit the form electronically. Once the license is 
issued, the system will automatically issue an aluminum import license 
number which will appear on the application page. The applicant will 
also receive a confirmation email. The refreshed form containing the 
submitted information and the newly issued license number will appear 
on the screen (the ``license form''). Applicants can print the license 
form themselves. If needed, copies of completed license forms can be 
retrieved by the user or requested from Commerce during normal business 
hours.
    Section 361.103(e) requires that users correct licenses themselves 
if they determine that there is an error submitted. To access a 
previously issued license, a user must log on with his/her username and 
identify the license number and the volume (quantity in kilograms) for 
the first product shown on the license. The information on the license 
should match the information presented in the entry summary data as 
closely as possible which includes the value and quantity of the 
shipment, the expected date of importation, and the customs port of 
entry.
    Pursuant to Sec.  361.101(b), the aluminum import license will be 
required for every entry of covered aluminum products (with certain 
exceptions for foreign trade zones and informal entries described 
below). As with SIMA, a single license can cover multiple products, as 
long as the information at the top of the form (i.e., importer, 
exporter, manufacturer, country of origin and exportation, the expected 
date of export, first and second country of smelt, and expected date of 
import), are the same for the shipment. However, separate licenses will 
be required if any of the information above differs with respect to a 
given set of covered imported aluminum products. As a result, a single 
CBP entry may require more than one aluminum import license. The 
applicable license number(s) must cover the total quantity of the 
aluminum product entered and should match the information provided on 
the CBP entry summary. There is no requirement to present physical 
copies of the license forms at the time of entry summary. However, 
copies must be maintained in accordance with CBP's normal requirements. 
Licenses will be issued for single use and will be specific to an entry 
(as discussed above), with the exception of low-value licenses 
described below.
    Certain information collected from the license application system 
that can be aggregated without revealing business proprietary 
information will be reported on the public AIM monitor, as described in 
further detail below. All other information including copies of the 
licenses and the names of importers, exporters, and manufacturers, will 
be considered business proprietary information and will not be released 
to the public.

Duration of the Aluminum Import License

    In accordance with Sec.  361.103(d), the aluminum import license 
can be applied for up to 60 days prior to the expected date of import 
and until the date of filing of the CBP entry summary documents, or its 
electronic equivalent. The aluminum import license is valid for up to 
75 days. However, import licenses which are valid on the date of import 
but expire prior to the filing of CBP entry summary documents will be 
accepted. Issues related to foreign trade zones are addressed below.

License Rules for Certain Types of Entries

    In accordance with Sec.  361.101(e), aluminum import licenses are 
not required on temporary importation bond (TIB) entries, 
transportation and exportation (T&E) entries or entries into a bonded 
warehouse. Covered aluminum products withdrawn for consumption from a 
bonded warehouse will require a license at the entry summary.

Foreign Trade Zone Admissions

    Pursuant to Sec.  361.101(c), all shipments of covered aluminum 
products into foreign trade zone (FTZ), known as FTZ admissions, will 
require an aluminum import license prior to the filing of FTZ admission 
documents. The license number(s) must be reported on the FTZ admission 
documents and/or status designation (Customs Form 214) at the time of 
filing. There is no requirement to present physical copies of the 
license forms at the time of FTZ admission. However, copies must be

[[Page 83808]]

maintained in accordance with Customs' normal requirements. FTZ 
admission documents without the required license number(s) will not be 
considered complete and will be subject to liquidated damages for 
violation of the bond condition requiring timely completion of 
admission. A further aluminum import license will not be required for 
shipments of entries for consumption from zones into the commerce of 
the United States. In the case of FTZ admissions, the aluminum import 
license can be applied for up to 60 days prior to the expected date of 
importation into the Zone and until the date of filing of Customs Form 
214. For FTZs, the licenses do not expire and covered aluminum products 
do not require a new license when leaving the zone and entering for 
consumption.

Informal Entries and Low-Value Licenses

    In accordance with Sec.  361.101(d), no import license shall be 
required on informal entries of covered aluminum products, such as 
merchandise valued at less than $2,500 (see 19 CFR 143.21 through 
143.28 for further information). This exemption applies to informal 
entries only; imports of aluminum valued at less than $2,500 that are 
part of a formal entry will require a license.
    Pursuant to Sec.  361.103(f), for shipments containing less than 
$5,000 worth of aluminum, applicants can apply for a reusable low-value 
license.

Public AIM Monitor

    As provided in Sec.  361.104, the public AIM monitor, featured on 
the AIM system website, will report certain aggregate information on 
imports of aluminum product categories using both publicly available 
import data and data obtained from the aluminum licenses. The public 
AIM monitor will provide information on U.S. imports of aluminum from 
all countries by broad product categories in both value and volume 
measures. Once the license collection begins, additional data will be 
added to the public AIM monitor. Aggregate data will be reported, as 
appropriate, on a monthly basis by country of origin, country where the 
largest volume of primary aluminum used in the manufacture of the 
product was smelted, country where the second largest volume of primary 
aluminum used in the manufacture of the product was smelted, country of 
most recent cast, and relevant aluminum product grouping, etc. and will 
include import quantity (metric tons), import Customs value (U.S. $), 
and average unit value ($/metric ton). The website will also contain 
certain aggregate data at the 6-digit Harmonized Tariff Schedule level 
and will also present a range of historical data for comparison 
purposes. Provision of aggregate data on the website may be revisited 
should concerns arise over the possible release of proprietary data. 
The public AIM monitor will be similar to SIMA's but will not 
incorporate preliminary Census data. Commerce believes that the early 
release preliminary data from Census is not critical to the early 
warning monitor because the aluminum import license data will be 
available.
    With respect to the public AIM monitor, which will aggregate and 
report certain license data, Commerce will only release or update 
weekly data on the country of smelt and cast for each product group (at 
the 6-digit HTS level) if there are sufficient observations for the 
product groups. Commerce releases data on its public AIM monitor under 
the authority of the Census Act (13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 302) and must 
adhere to Census guidance for the release of data which requires the 
protection of proprietary data. After collecting the data on the 
countries of smelt and country of most recent cast, Commerce will 
determine whether there are sufficient data observations to report at a 
6-digit product group level without disclosing proprietary data. The 
public AIM monitor will divide license data into various product 
groupings, which can be seen at https://www.trade.gov/aluminum. In 
instances where there are few (i.e., less than three) observations of 
certain country of origin/product group combinations, Commerce will not 
provide this disaggregated data (i.e., product group level) when adding 
the countries of smelt and country of cast data. Further, provision of 
aggregate data on the public AIM monitor may be revisited should 
concerns arise over the possible release of business proprietary data.
    Reported monthly import data will be updated each week with new 
data collected from licenses issued in the prior week. The data 
collected may be adjusted periodically for corrected, canceled or 
unused aluminum import licenses, if deemed appropriate, for accurate 
monitoring purposes. Information provided in the public AIM monitor 
will mirror the information available on the public SIMA monitor.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See SIMA Modification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The public AIM monitor will also present a range of historical data 
for comparison purposes. This will include comparisons to the previous 
month and to the same month in the previous year; three month rolling 
averages along with similar comparisons to the immediately preceding 
period, the same period from the preceding year; and monthly import 
data on each aluminum product category.
    At the sub-regulatory level, Commerce will consider adding 
additional product groups (for example, aluminum scrap) to the public 
AIM monitor beyond the HTS categories covered by the license 
requirement, which will be based on publicly available import data.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ As discussed below, after the AIM system is in place, 
Commerce will seek additional comment from parties on potential 
improvements or changes to the system in a subsequent notice, 
including adding aluminum scrap products to the licensing 
requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Miscellaneous Provisions

    Section 361.105 is reserved. Section 361.106 provides that no fees 
will be charged for obtaining a username, issuing an aluminum import 
license or accessing the public AIM monitor. Additionally, Sec.  
361.107 provides that the AIM system will generally be accessible 24 
hours a day, 7 days a week but may be unavailable at times for server 
maintenance. If the system is unavailable for an extended period of 
time, parties will be able to obtain licenses from Commerce directly 
via email (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0d1dcc5ddd9dec5dd9edcd9d3d5dec3d5f0c4c2d1d4d59ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1808d948c888f948ccf8d8882848f9284a19593808584cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>) during regular business hours. 
Should the system be inaccessible for an extended period of time, 
Commerce would advise Customs to consider this as part of mitigation on 
any liquidated damage claims that may be issued. Lastly, Sec.  361.108 
states that Commerce may revoke a filer's electronic licensing 
privileges if the filer consistently files inaccurate licensing 
information or otherwise abuses the system. In such instances, the 
filer would only be able to obtain a license directly from Commerce, 
which may take 10 working days to process. Delays in the filing caused 
by the removal of a filer's electronic filing privilege will not be 
considered a mitigating factor by CBP.

Response to Comments Received on the Proposed Rule

    Commerce received 17 comments on the proposed rule that Commerce 
considered in finalizing this rule. Below is a summary of the comments, 
grouped by issue category, followed by Commerce's response. Further, 
because the AIM system is being adopted for the first time in this 
final rule, after the AIM system is in place, Commerce will seek 
additional comment from parties on potential improvements or changes to 
the system in a subsequent notice. Parties will have the opportunity to 
provide further comment on any issue

[[Page 83809]]

discussed herein or any related topic at that time.

1. Country of Smelt and Pour Field

    Several commenters supported the general concept of a ``smelt and 
pour'' requirement, while several other commenters opposed it. Most 
commenters recommended using the term ``smelt and cast'' instead of 
``smelt and pour'' because they argued that ``pour'' was not a term 
used widely in the aluminum industry. These commenters recommended a 
wide range of alternatives.
a. Replacing ``Pour'' With ``Casting''
    Several commenters recommended that Commerce collect information on 
the country of smelt and replace the term ``pour'' with the country of 
most recent cast. Another commenter recommended collecting information 
only on the country of most recent cast, but not the country where 
primary aluminum was smelted.
b. Traceability of Country of Smelt
    Several commenters stated that filers would not always know where 
primary aluminum used in their products was originally smelted because 
primary aluminum is often smelted and shipped to one or more third 
countries where it may be re-melted, alloyed, and/or shaped before 
shipment to the U.S. These commenters were concerned that tracing the 
primary aluminum, from the original smelting, through all the stages of 
re-melting in different countries might not be possible. However, 
several other commenters asserted that it is possible to trace the 
country of smelt, but it might take some time to gather such 
information. Another commenter requested that Commerce collect 
information on country of origin, and opposed collecting information on 
smelting, pouring, or casting. This commenter stated that it would be 
burdensome to collect information beyond country of origin for alloys 
and secondary products but did not provide further details about the 
burden. This commenter also stated that it would be impossible to 
collect ``smelt and pour'' information for scrap.
    One commenter asserted that aluminum semi-finished goods (profiles, 
castings, and rolled products) were produced using a mixture of primary 
aluminum, secondary (recycled) aluminum, and pre- and post-consumer 
aluminum scrap. The commenter stated that it was unclear how a smelt 
and pour field should be completed for typical aluminum products where 
the aluminum was smelted in various countries. This commenter 
recommended removing the smelt and pour field altogether, allowing an 
``unknown'' option, or replacing smelt and pour with ``last melted and 
poured.'' Several other commenters explained that some aluminum imports 
contain only secondary (recycled) aluminum and, as a result, requested 
that importers have the option of reporting ``no primary aluminum'' in 
the smelt and pour (or smelt and cast) field. Another commenter also 
requested that the AIM system collect information on country of 
alloying which may be different from the country of most recent cast.
c. Requiring Further Documentation and Additional Requirements
    Two commenters requested that Commerce collect documentation 
regarding the country of smelt and pour or the country of origin. One 
of these commenters requested that Commerce collect Country of Origin 
and Country of Analysis certificates, and another commenter requested 
the collection of mill test certificates for each stage of processing. 
Another commenter suggested that CBP examine the aluminum licenses, not 
just the license number, and inspect them against other import 
documents. Similarly, another commenter suggested that documentation 
proving Mexican country of origin should be required for imports from 
Mexico. These commenters expressed concerns that primary aluminum could 
be produced in countries other than Canada and Mexico, shipped to these 
countries as either ingots or other shapes, re-melted, and then entered 
duty-free if declared as Canadian or Mexican country of origin.
    Response: In the Proposed Rule, Commerce proposed a field to 
reflect the country where the primary aluminum used in the manufacture 
of the imported aluminum product was smelted and poured. Based on 
comments received on the Proposed Rule, Commerce will make several 
modifications to better reflect the characteristics of the aluminum 
industry and provide clarity to license applicants. These modifications 
are described in detail above and summarized here.
    Specifically, the reference to ``country of smelt'' has been 
further refined and the reference to ``country of pour'' is removed 
from the final rule. Pursuant to Sec.  361.103(c)(1)(xiii), (xiv), and 
(xv), Commerce will require the license applicant to provide 
information in three separate fields: (1) The country where the largest 
volume of primary aluminum used in the manufacture of the imported 
aluminum product was smelted (referred to as ``country of smelt for the 
largest volume of primary aluminum'' as shorthand), (2) the country 
where the second largest volume of primary aluminum used in the 
manufacture of the imported aluminum product was smelted (referred to 
as ``country of smelt for the second largest volume of primary 
aluminum'' as shorthand), and (3) the country where the aluminum used 
in the imported aluminum product was most recently cast (referred to as 
``country of most recent cast'' for shorthand). These fields are 
further described under Sec.  361.103(c)(3), including definitions. 
These updates also are adopted in the aluminum license application 
form. We address individual comments below.
    As discussed above, after the AIM system is in place, Commerce will 
seek additional comment from parties on potential improvements or 
changes to the system in a subsequent notice. In particular, parties 
may comment on the requirement to report the country of smelt for the 
largest and second largest volume of primary aluminum and the country 
of most recent cast discussed herein.
A. Replace ``Pour'' With the Term ``Most Recent Casting'' and Have 
Separate License Fields for ``Smelting'' and ``Most Recent Casting''
    We agree with commenters that the reference to ``country of pour'' 
should be removed from the final rule because this term is not widely 
used in the aluminum industry. Additionally, based on comments, we have 
adopted the three fields described above. Requiring the completion of 
these separate fields will allow Commerce to collect data that are most 
relevant to the aluminum industry while minimizing the burden to 
applicants. Moreover, collection of this data will allow for the 
effective and timely monitoring of import surges of specific aluminum 
products and will assist in preventing the transshipment of aluminum 
products. Separately requiring the identification of the country of 
smelt for the largest and second largest volume of primary aluminum and 
the country of most recent cast better reflects data available to the 
industry. Furthermore, the specificity of the requested information 
should minimize confusion caused by the initially proposed ``smelt and 
pour'' field.
    Commerce also agrees with certain commenters' requests that clear 
definitions regarding these terms should be included in the aluminum 
license application. Specifically, in the country of smelt for the 
largest volume of primary aluminum field, the license

[[Page 83810]]

applicant will be required to identify the country where the largest 
quantity of new aluminum metal is produced from alumina (or aluminum 
oxide) by the electrolytic Hall-H[eacute]roult process.\20\ The country 
of smelt for the second largest volume of primary aluminum field adopts 
a similar definition. The establishment of these fields and the adopted 
definitions for these fields takes into account comments on the 
Proposed Rule as well as third-party sources, such as the discussion of 
primary aluminum production featured on the website of the Aluminum 
Association.\21\ Thus, these definitions are consistent with the well-
understood and generally accepted description of the primary aluminum 
production process in the aluminum industry. Additionally, these 
precise field names and definitions are further refinements of the term 
``country of smelt,'' that was included the Proposed Rule, to provide 
increased clarity and consistency for all potentially regulated 
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See https://www.aluminum.org/industries/production/primary-production.
    \21\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Moreover, by including a field for the country of smelt for the 
second largest volume of primary aluminum, Commerce will address 
concerns from foreign producers, importers, and downstream producers 
that primary aluminum is often melted and chemically mixed with 
secondary aluminum and/or primary aluminum from multiple countries. At 
the same time, Commerce will allow applicants to state ``not 
applicable'' in this field if the product does not contain a second 
largest volume of primary aluminum. Additionally, applicants may state 
``not applicable'' in this field if the product contains only secondary 
aluminum and no primary aluminum. For clarity, Commerce defines 
secondary aluminum as aluminum metal that is produced from recycled 
aluminum scrap through a re-melting process.\22\ Consistent with other 
definitions adopted in this final rule, this definition takes into 
account comments on the Proposed Rule as well as third-party sources, 
and reflects a well-understood and generally accepted description of 
the secondary aluminum production process in the aluminum industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See https://www.aluminum.org/industries/production/secondary-production.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, in the country of most recent cast field, the license 
applicant will be required to identify the country where the aluminum 
(with or without alloying elements) was last liquified by heat, and 
cast into a solid state.\23\ The final solid state can take the form of 
either a semi-finished product (slab, billets or ingots) or a finished 
aluminum product.\24\ This is a refinement of the term ``country of 
pour,'' that was also in the Proposed Rule, and also provides increased 
clarity as requested by commenters. And similar to the above 
definitions, this definition takes into account third-party sources and 
reflects a well-understood and generally accepted description of 
aluminum processing in the aluminum industry. In light of this, we are 
adopting these fields and corresponding definitions in the final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See http://centuryaluminum.com/plants-products/sebree/index.html, accessed July 17, 2020 and https://www.aluminum.org/sites/default/files/GAG_001_Terms_and_Definitions_3rd_Edition_2011_01_August_21_2011_JW.pdf, accessed July 17, 2020.
    \24\ See https://www.aluminum.org/industries/processing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Option To State ``Unknown'' in the Fields for the Country of Smelt 
for the Largest and Second Largest Volume of Primary Aluminum for a 
One-Year Period
    As stated above, recognizing that importers may have some initial 
difficulty in securing the information necessary to complete the fields 
for the country of smelt for the largest and second largest volume of 
primary aluminum, Commerce will allow filers to state ``unknown'' in 
these fields on a temporary basis. Specifically, ``unknown'' may be 
stated for a period of one year from the publication of the final rule 
(i.e., up to December 23, 2021) to enable license applicants sufficient 
time to gather the requisite information. Effective one year from the 
publication of the final rule, December 24, 2021, filers will no longer 
be able to state ``unknown'' and then will be required to provide the 
requested information for this field.
    This will address concerns from commenters who do not always know 
the country where primary aluminum was smelted, especially when it is 
re-melted and alloyed with secondary aluminum. In contrast, for the 
modified SIMA system, Commerce determined that steel license applicants 
would be expected to know the country where the steel used in the 
manufacture of the product is melted and poured for purposes of 
completing this field in the license application. Specifically, 
Commerce determined that this information is identifiable in the mill 
test certification that would be readily available to the applicant, 
and, for this reason, declined to allow SIMA license applicants an 
option to state ``unknown'' in this field.\25\ Given the concerns 
identified above (i.e., that aluminum license applicants may not know 
the country where primary aluminum was smelted), Commerce is allowing 
the use of the ``unknown'' option for aluminum license applicants as 
described herein. Nevertheless, Commerce recognizes that allowing an 
``unknown'' option presents the potential for abuse and possible 
loophole concerns related to circumvention/transshipment and may 
inhibit the accurate collection of data. Therefore, Commerce will 
implement the following measures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See SIMA Modification, 85 FR at 56166.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, Commerce will allow the use of the ``unknown'' option for 
one year after the publication of the final rule, as described above. 
This will place importers on notice that they need to start collecting 
the necessary documentation that tracks this information within their 
supply chains. It will also allow the AIM system to be launched 
expeditiously while providing importers an adjustment period to start 
collecting this information. By providing this adjustment period and 
considering the burden to importers, the AIM system would then be 
aligned with SIMA requirements in one year when the ``unknown'' option 
is removed from the form.
    Second, applicants are required to certify that the information on 
the license application is correct to the best of the applicant's 
knowledge. Therefore, when importers select ``unknown'' in the license 
application, they are certifying that this is the best information 
available to them at the time of license application.
    Third, Commerce will monitor use of the ``unknown'' option for 
abuse, in a similar manner to current monitoring of the use of low-
value import licenses in the SIMA system. Commerce will identify 
license applicants who repeatedly report ``unknown'' in the fields for 
the countries where the largest and/or second largest volume(s) of 
primary aluminum is smelted and contact these applicants to confirm 
that they are providing the best available information.
    Fourth, to the extent possible without revealing business 
proprietary information, Commerce will also report data on the volume 
of imports associated with licenses that use the ``unknown'' option on 
the public AIM monitor. This will increase transparency and allow the 
industry to closely monitor, including raising concerns, of potential 
abuse and circumvention/transshipment.

[[Page 83811]]

C. Further Documentation and Additional Requirements
    Although commenters requested that Commerce collect further 
documentation (i.e., mill test certificates, Country of Analysis/Origin 
certificates) and/or require CBP to examine licenses in order to 
prevent transshipment and circumvention/evasion, Commerce will not 
require such documentation or requirement at this time. These 
suggestions would create additional burdens and the public has not had 
an opportunity to comment. Moreover, it would be administratively 
burdensome for Commerce to examine these documents in issuing licenses 
through the automated license application system, and for CBP to 
examine such documentation upon entry of covered aluminum products. 
Such a requirement would necessitate further inter-agency consultation 
and coordination and has not been considered for purposes of this final 
rule.
    Finally, Commerce will not collect information on the country of 
alloying because this would add another field to the license form and 
would likely provide redundant information that is already collected 
through the identification of country of most recent cast.
    That said, as discussed above, after the AIM system is in place, 
Commerce will seek additional comment from parties on potential 
improvements or changes to the system in a subsequent notice. Parties 
may further comment on the issues discussed above at that time.

2. Expanding the License Requirement for Aluminum Scrap and/or Other 
Aluminum Products Not Included in the Proposed Rule

    The Proposed Rule solicited comments on a licensing requirement for 
aluminum products subject to Section 232 tariffs, pursuant to 
Presidential Proclamation 9704,\26\ but several commenters discussed 
whether the licensing requirement should be expanded to cover 
additional aluminum products. Specifically, several commenters 
requested confirmation that scrap products (not subject to Section 232 
tariffs) be exempted from the Proposed Rule's smelt and pour 
requirement but did not comment on whether scrap products should be 
subject to the licensing requirement in the first instance. Several 
commenters stated that scrap should be subject to the licensing 
requirement, though not subject to the Proposed Rule's smelt and pour 
requirement, including one commenter that requested all of HTSUS 
Chapter 76 be subject to the licensing requirement. One commenter 
recommended allowing scrap importers to list the country where the 
scrap was purchased as the country of origin. Additionally, a commenter 
recommended expanding the licensing requirement to cover aluminum wire 
and cable products (HTS 7614.90.20, 7614.90.40, and 7614.90.50) because 
these products are now subject to Section 232 tariffs, pursuant to 
Presidential Proclamation 9980.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See Proposed Rule, 85 FR at 23751.
    \27\ See Presidential Proclamation 9980, 85 FR 5281.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Response: The AIM system will not require import licenses for 
aluminum scrap (HTS 7602), and certain downstream/derivative products 
whose inclusion is requested in comments and are now subject to Section 
232 tariffs pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 9980 (i.e., aluminum 
wire and cable products (HTS 7614.90.20, 7614.90.40, and 
7614.90.50)).\28\ Commerce did not request comments on including these 
products in the Proposed Rule \29\ and, as a result, the public has not 
been afforded an opportunity to provide comments on such a change to 
the scope of products subject to the AIM system. However, Commerce has 
considered the commenters' assertion that collecting data on scrap and 
downstream products will assist in monitoring potential evasion/
circumvention. Accordingly, as discussed above, after the AIM system is 
in place, Commerce will seek additional comment from parties on 
potential improvements or changes to the system in a subsequent notice. 
Parties may comment on the inclusion of these products in the AIM 
system's import license requirement at that time. Furthermore, as noted 
above, at the sub-regulatory level, Commerce will consider adding 
additional product groups (such as aluminum scrap) to the public AIM 
monitor beyond the HTS categories covered by the license requirement, 
which will be based only on publicly available import data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ Id.
    \29\ See Proposed Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Reconciling License Values Post-Entry

    Several commenters stated that aluminum prices are based on a 
London Metal Exchange (LME) reference price that is often unavailable 
at time of importation, so the price of the product imported would need 
to be corrected (reconciled) post-entry. These commenters were 
concerned that importers would need to correct values for all or nearly 
all aluminum imports after entry, increasing the public burden on 
completing the license application.
    Response: As per 19 CFR 361.103(e), applicants will need to correct 
their licenses if they determine that there was an error in their 
application. The information on the license should match the 
information presented in the Customs Form 7501 entry summary document 
as closely as possible; this includes the value and quantity of the 
shipment, the expected date of importation, and the Customs port of 
entry. Commerce has included instructions on the license application, 
specifying that importers are to provide their best estimate of the 
value of imports at the time of license completion. Although this 
estimate does not need to perfectly match the final reconciled value on 
CBP entry summary documents, the estimate should be reasonably 
accurate, based on invoices, shipping documents, or the current LME 
reference price for the commodity imported (at time of license 
completion). Further, the regulations state that licenses are to 
closely reflect the information contained in the entry summaries. 
Therefore, importers will have the ability to edit and correct the 
information provided on the licenses after entry and will be able to 
address large discrepancies in accordance with 19 CFR 361.103(e).

4. Reporting of Data in the Public AIM Monitor

    There were two comments about the reporting of data in the public 
AIM monitor. One commenter requested that data be collected and 
reported at the 10-digit HTS level in order to distinguish between two 
types of aluminum products, can sheet end and body stock, that are the 
same at the 8-digit HTS level. Another commenter requested that the 
public AIM monitor publicly disclose specific import data (including 
specific importers and sources of imports), rather than aggregate 
import data to increase transparency.
    Response: Commerce understands that it would be optimal from the 
data users' perspective to have the full 10-digit information collected 
through the licenses available to the users of the public AIM monitor. 
However, this may contain proprietary data, making it impossible for 
Commerce to provide so much detail. Commerce will release data in as 
much detail as possible (i.e., at the most disaggregated level 
possible) without releasing companies' proprietary information. Like 
the public SIMA monitor, Commerce will release data on its public AIM 
monitor under the authority of the Census Act (13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 
302) and must adhere

[[Page 83812]]

to Census guidance for the release of data which requires the 
protection of proprietary data. After collecting license data, Commerce 
will determine whether there are sufficient data observations (i.e., 
more than three) to report at a 6-digit HTS level without disclosing 
business proprietary data. As with steel license data, the rationale 
for releasing only 6-digit HTS detail information is based on the 
notion that releasing data at the 10-digit HTS level from the license 
collection (updated weekly) could violate these rules and likely 
release identifiable proprietary information. Once Commerce begins the 
license collection, Commerce will re-evaluate the level of product 
detail it can release appropriately without disclosing proprietary 
information.

5. Timing of License Application/Validity

    One commenter requested allowing quarterly licenses that were only 
estimates of the total import volume, created up to 120 days before 
importation to reduce the public burden and to provide an early warning 
about imports farther in advance than the 60 days in the proposed rule. 
Another commenter requested that Commerce not require licenses too far 
ahead of importation date (no more than 30 days).
    Response: In accordance with Sec.  361.103(d), and as described 
above, Commerce will require applicants to obtain a license prior to 
entry, up to 60 days in advance, the same period as the existing SIMA 
system. Licenses will be automatic and immediate, so an importer could 
create a license only minutes before entry. However, applicants will be 
encouraged to create licenses further in advance to maximize Commerce's 
ability to provide the public with an early warning about import 
trends. Licenses cannot be based on quarterly summaries, and volumes 
should closely match those on all other documents required for 
importation because allowing vague quarterly estimates would undermine 
the accuracy of the system.

6. Collecting Information Related to Section 232 Tariffs

    There were several comments about Section 232 tariffs and tariff 
exclusions. One commenter requested requiring importers to indicate 
whether they received an exclusion on the license and requested that 
the public AIM monitor present exclusion data on its website. Another 
commenter requested that licensing only be required for imports from 
countries that are not exempt from the Section 232 program.
    Response: Commerce, at this time, will not require AIM license 
applicants to report information on Section 232 exclusions in the 
license application. As an initial matter, the AIM system and the 
Section 232 exclusion process, although both housed within Commerce, 
are administered separately and under separate legal authorities. 
Therefore, inclusion of a new field for Section 232 exclusions will 
require further consideration and analysis. Further, because Commerce 
did not request comments on including this additional field in the 
Proposed Rule, the public has not been afforded an opportunity to 
provide comments on what would be a significant change to the license 
application.
    That said, Commerce has considered the commenters' assertion that 
collecting data on Section 232 exclusions could assist in monitoring 
for potential surges. Accordingly, as discussed above, after the AIM 
system is in place, Commerce will seek additional comment from parties 
on potential improvements or changes to the system in a subsequent 
notice, including the potential inclusion of a field for Section 232 
exclusions on the AIM license application, at that time.
    Additionally, Commerce is not accepting the commenter's request 
that licenses only be required for imports from countries that are not 
exempt from Section 232 tariffs. Requiring licenses for aluminum 
imports from all countries is consistent with the objectives of the 
joint understandings and the AIM system to monitor all imports of 
aluminum for potential surges. Indeed, a main objective of the joint 
understandings is to monitor potential surge patterns involving 
countries exempted from the Section 232 tariffs.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See Joint Statement by the United States and Canada on 
Section 232 Duties on Steel and Aluminum, dated May 17, 2019, 
available at https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Joint_Statement_by_the_United_States_and_Canada.pdf; Joint Statement 
by the United States and Mexico on Section 232 Duties on Steel and 
Aluminum, dated May 17, 2019, available at https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Joint_Statement_by_the_United_States_and_Mexico.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. Training Materials

    One commenter requested additional training material on how to 
create licenses and reconcile import values.
    Response: Commerce will create training webinars, a ``Frequently 
Asked Questions'' page on the AIM system website, and other materials 
to ensure that the public understands the licensing requirement. This 
does not require regulatory modifications.

8. Bonded Warehouses

    One commenter requested that bonded warehouses not be exempted from 
licensing requirements. The commenter raised concerns that, because 
licenses can be obtained quickly and automatically, exempting bonded 
warehouses from licensing requirements creates the potential for 
importers to stockpile aluminum without licenses and then to later 
import them into the United States for consumption based on more 
favorable pricing conditions in the U.S. market. This commenter 
asserted that storing goods in bonded warehouses would also undermine 
the early warning provided by requiring importers to obtain licenses 
prior to entry of aluminum products.
    Response: As provided in section 19 CFR 361.101(e) and consistent 
with the SIMA system, Commerce will not require users to obtain 
aluminum import licenses for entry into bonded warehouses. However, 
entries of covered aluminum products withdrawn for consumption from 
bonded warehouses will require a license at the entry summary. Entry 
into bonded warehouses does not constitute an entry for consumption as 
provided in Sec.  361.101(b) and (e), and some of the aluminum could 
subsequently be re-exported from bonded warehouses. Additionally, 
Commerce also finds that including these shipments in the aluminum 
license data would likely overestimate monthly imports of aluminum for 
consumption. Furthermore, this would require users to obtain two 
separate licenses for importation into bonded warehouses and 
importation into consumption. This would increase the public burden and 
further reduce the accuracy of AIM licenses because the system would 
double-count these licenses.

9. Request for Further Consultation With Mexican Government

    Several commenters requested that the United States and Mexico 
implement an ``agreed-upon process for monitoring aluminum trade 
between both countries'' as part of USMCA negotiations. One commenter 
sought explicit clarification regarding whether the AIM system 
constitutes the ``agreed-upon process for monitoring aluminum trade 
between countries'' in accordance with the joint understandings on 
aluminum.\31\ In particular, this commenter requested that the U.S.

[[Page 83813]]

clarify the role of the AIM system with regard to the objectives of the 
joint understandings. This commenter also requested that Commerce 
clarify whether any additional measures to prevent unfair imports and 
transshipment are intended to complement the AIM system. This commenter 
further requested clarification regarding whether the AIM system could 
be modified in the future in the event of an ``alternative bilateral'' 
agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See Joint Statement by the United States and Mexico on 
Section 232 Duties on Steel and Aluminum, dated May 17, 2019, 
available at https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Joint_Statement_by_the_United_States_and_Mexico.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Another commenter asserted that the joint understandings specify 
that the importing country may request consultation with the exporting 
country in the event of an import surge. This commenter requested that 
the AIM system therefore include a method for periodic consultations 
with the Government of Mexico.
    Response: Although Commerce is cognizant of commenters' concerns 
regarding increased imports and transshipment, Commerce will not 
consult further with the Government of Mexico at this time. The Office 
of the U.S. Trade Representative is already actively engaged in ongoing 
discussions with the Mexican Government regarding import surges. 
Commenters should therefore direct relevant comments or questions to 
USTR. The Government of Mexico is aware that the AIM system has been 
proposed by the U.S. Government for monitoring aluminum import 
surges.\32\ Furthermore, the AIM system is a monitoring system and not 
an enforcement mechanism, therefore, incorporating a consultation 
method into the system exceeds the authority under which the system is 
established and the scope of its intended activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See generally Proposed Rule, 85 FR at 23748.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Classifications

Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this 
final rule is significant, but not economically significant, for 
purposes of Executive Order 12866.

Executive Order 13771

    This final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13771 because it 
imposes de minimis costs.

Executive Order 13132

    This final rule does not contain policies with federalism 
implications as that term is defined in section 1(a) of Executive Order 
13132, dated August 4, 1999 (64 FR 43255 (August 10, 1999)).

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule contains a collection of information subject to the 
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 (PRA). Similar 
requirements have been approved for steel by OMB (OMB No.: 0625-0245; 
Expiration Date: 07/31/2023). Based on Commerce's experience with steel 
and sample data for aluminum entries, Commerce estimates that public 
reporting for the data collection of information in the aluminum import 
license will be less than 10.5 minutes per response, including the time 
for reviewing instructions, and completing and reviewing and correcting 
the collection of information. Commerce also estimates that the average 
registered applicant will complete about 173 licenses per year each and 
an estimated total of 278,538 regular licenses and 50 low value 
licenses will be issued each year.
Paperwork Reduction Act Data
    OMB Number: 0625-0279.
    ITA Number: ITA-4142a (regular license); ITA-4142b (low-value 
license).
    Type of Review: Regular Submission.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Registered Users: 1,750.
    Estimated Time per Response: Less than 10.5 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 48,749 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Costs: $0.00.
    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required 
to respond to nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to 
comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of 
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information 
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. As discussed above, after 
the AIM system is in place, Commerce will seek additional comment from 
parties on potential improvements or changes to the system in a 
subsequent notice. Parties may further comment on this collection of 
information at that time.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce 
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
Administration at the proposed rule stage that this rule if adopted, 
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities as that term is defined in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. (RFA). The factual basis for the 
certification is found in the proposed rule and is repeated below. No 
comments were received on the certification or the economic impacts of 
this action. As a result, no final regulatory flexibility analysis is 
required and none was prepared.
    This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. This rule, if implemented, would: 
(1) Require importers of covered aluminum products to apply for and 
obtain an import license from Commerce's online license application 
system; (2) for purposes of obtaining the license, require import 
license applicants to provide information that is largely already 
required for purposes of importation into the customs territory of the 
United States pursuant to CBP requirements; (3) for information that is 
not already required for entry purposes, require import license 
applicants to specify certain information including the country where 
primary aluminum used in the manufacture of the imported aluminum 
product was smelted and where the product was most recently cast; and 
(4) cover the following HTS codes: 7601, 7604, 7605, 7606, 7607, 7608, 
7609, 7616.99.51.60, and 7616.99.51.70, and any subsequent revisions to 
these HTS classifications.
    The entities that would be impacted by this rule are importers and 
brokerage companies that import aluminum products. Based on statistics 
derived from current license applications for steel under the SIMA 
system, of the approximately 563,107 licenses (both regular and low-
value licenses) issued each year, Commerce estimates that less than two 
percent (11,262) of steel license applications are filed by importers 
and brokerage companies considered to be small entities. Commerce 
estimates that the number of aluminum licenses issued under the AIM 
system will be about half of the number of steel licenses under the 
SIMA system, based on statistics for one month's entry information.\33\ 
Therefore, our estimate for aluminum is that approximately 278,588 
licenses (both regular and low-value licenses) will be issued each 
year, and of that figure, less than two percent (5,572) of the license 
applications will be filed by importers and brokerage companies 
considered to be small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ This estimate is based on CBP data covering May 2019. 
Specifically, in May 2019 there were approximately 64,000 entries 
subject to the SIMA licensing requirement based on the covered HTS 
categories for SIMA. In that same month, approximately 31,000 
entries entered under the covered HTS categories for AIM.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 83814]]

    Based on the current usage of the SIMA system, Commerce does not 
anticipate that this rule will have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. The AIM system will mirror the 
SIMA system to the extent practicable. In most cases, brokerage 
companies will apply for the license on behalf of the aluminum 
importers. Many of the same brokerage firms that handle steel imports 
will likely handle aluminum imports, and, therefore, are familiar with 
the SIMA online license application system upon which the AIM system is 
based. Most brokerage companies that are currently involved in filing 
documentation for importing goods into the United States are accustomed 
to CBP's automated entry filing systems. Today, CBP's filings are 
handled electronically. Additionally, the regulated entities are 
already required to provide certain information required by the 
aluminum license application, including the name and address of the 
importer, type of aluminum product, and country of origin, along with 
additional information for purposes of filing the entry summary 
documentation required by CBP. For certain fields, in particular, the 
fields for the country where the largest and second largest volume of 
primary aluminum is smelted and the country where the aluminum product 
was most recently cast, the information requested is not already 
required by CBP. For the first two fields, Commerce recognizes that 
there may be some difficulty in reporting the requested information, 
and, therefore, is allowing parties to state ``unknown'' for one year 
from the publication of the final rule for these fields. In this one 
year time, Commerce anticipates that those parties will be able to 
obtain the requisite information. Additionally, Commerce believes that 
the country where the aluminum product was most recently cast is 
information that generally is readily available to the importer or its 
broker and is most likely to be identified in the import documentation 
accompanying the entry summary to be filed with CBP (invoices, lab 
reports, etc.). In some instances, the country of most recent cast may 
be identified as the country of origin. Therefore, the license 
application should not be a significant obstacle to any firm.
    Further, should an importer or brokerage company need to register 
for an account or apply for a license non-electronically, an email/
phone option is available at Commerce during regular business hours. 
There will be no cost to register for a company-specific aluminum 
license account and no cost to file for the license. Each license form 
is expected to take less than 10.5 minutes to complete and collects 
much of the same information required on the CBP entry summary 
documentation. The import license is the only additional U.S. entry 
requirement that the importers or their representatives must fulfill in 
order to import each covered product shipment under 19 CFR part 361.
    Commerce does not charge fees for licenses. Similar to the 
estimates used for the steel license program, Commerce estimates that 
the likely aggregate license costs incurred by small entities in terms 
of the time to apply for licenses as a result of this rule would be 
less than two percent, or an estimated $19,500, of the estimated total 
$974,980 cost to all aluminum importers to process the on-line 
automatic licenses. These calculations are based on an hourly pay rate 
of $20.00 multiplied by the estimated 48,750 total annual burden hours. 
The average cost of a single license is less than $4.17 based on the 
estimate that one license requires less than 10.5 minutes of the 
filer's time.
    Therefore, the Department certified that the final rule will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
business entities.

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 361

    Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry, 
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Aluminum.

    Dated: December 16, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Commerce 
adds 19 CFR part 361 as follows:

PART 361--ALUMINUM IMPORT MONITORING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM

Sec.
361.101 Aluminum import licensing.
361.102 Online registration.
361.103 Automatic issuance of import licenses.
361.104 Aluminum import monitoring.
361.105 [Reserved]
361.106 Fees.
361.107 Hours of operation.
361.108 Loss of electronic licensing privileges.

    Authority: 13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 302.


Sec.  361.101  Aluminum import licensing.

    (a) In general. (1) All imports of basic aluminum products are 
subject to the import licensing requirements imposed by the U.S. 
Department of Commerce (Commerce). These products are listed on the 
Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis (AIM) system website (https://www.trade.gov/aluminum). Registered users will be able to obtain 
aluminum import licenses on the AIM system website. This website 
contains two sections related to import licensing--the online 
registration system and the automatic aluminum import license issuance 
system. Aluminum import licenses must be provided to U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection (CBP or Customs) as discussed in this section. 
Information gathered from these licenses will be aggregated and posted 
on the import monitoring section of the AIM system website.
    (2) A single license may cover multiple products as long as certain 
information on the license (e.g., importer, exporter, manufacturer and 
country of origin) remains the same. However, separate licenses for 
aluminum entered under a single entry will be required if the 
information differs. As a result, a single Customs entry may require 
more than one aluminum import license. The applicable license(s) must 
cover the total quantity of aluminum entered and should cover the same 
information provided on the Customs entry summary.
    (b) Entries for consumption. All entries for consumption of covered 
aluminum products, other than the exceptions discussed in paragraphs 
(c) and (d) of this section, will require an import license prior to 
the filing of Customs entry summary documents, or its electronic 
equivalent. The license number(s) must be reported on the entry summary 
(Customs Form 7501), or its electronic equivalent, at the time of 
filing. There is no requirement to present physical copies of the 
license forms at the time of entry summary. However, copies must be 
maintained in accordance with Customs' normal requirements. Entry 
summaries submitted without the required license number(s) will be 
considered incomplete and will be subject to liquidated damages for 
violation of the bond condition requiring timely completion of entry.
    (c) Foreign Trade Zone admissions. All shipments of covered 
aluminum products into a foreign trade zone (FTZ), known as FTZ 
admissions, will require an import license prior to the filing of FTZ 
admission documents, or its electronic equivalents. The license 
number(s) must be reported on the application for FTZ admission and/or 
status designation (Customs Form 214) at the time of filing. There is 
no

[[Page 83815]]

requirement to present physical copies of the license forms at the time 
of FTZ admission; however, copies must be maintained in accordance with 
Customs' normal requirements. FTZ admission documents submitted without 
the required license number(s) will not be considered complete and will 
be subject to liquidated damages for violation of the bond condition 
requiring timely completion of admission. The aluminum license for FTZ 
admission does not expire, and a further aluminum license will not be 
required for shipments of entries for consumption from zones into the 
commerce of the United States.
    (d) Informal entries. No import license shall be required on 
informal entries of covered aluminum products, such as merchandise 
valued at less than $2,500. This exemption applies to informal entries 
only; imports of aluminum valued at less than $2,500 that are part of a 
formal entry will require a license. For additional information, refer 
to 19 CFR 143.21 through 143.28.
    (e) Other non-consumption entries. Import licenses are not required 
on temporary importation bond (TIB) entries, transportation and 
exportation (T&E) entries or entries into a bonded warehouse. Covered 
aluminum products withdrawn for consumption from a bonded warehouse 
will require a license at the entry summary in accordance with 
paragraph (b) of this section.


Sec.  361.102  Online registration.

    (a) In general. (1) Any importer, importing company, customs broker 
or importer's agent with a U.S. street address may register and obtain 
the username necessary to log on to the automatic aluminum import 
license issuance system. Foreign companies may obtain a username if 
they have a U.S. address through which they may be reached; P.O. boxes 
will not be accepted. A username will be issued within two business 
days. Companies will be able to register online through the AIM system 
website. However, should a company prefer to apply for a username non-
electronically, a phone/email option will be available at Commerce 
during regular business hours.
    (2) This username will be required in order to log on to the 
aluminum import license issuance system. A single username will be 
issued to an importer, customs broker or importer's agent. Operating 
units within the company (e.g., individual branches, divisions or 
employees) will all use the same basic company username but can supply 
suffixes to identify the branches. The aluminum import license issuance 
system will be designed to allow multiple users of a single 
identification number from different locations within the company to 
enter information simultaneously.
    (b) Information required to obtain a username. In order to obtain a 
username, the importer, importing company, customs broker or importer's 
agent will be required to provide general information. This information 
will include: The filer company name, employer identification number 
(EIN) or Customs ID number (the Customs-issued importer number) (where 
no EIN is available), U.S. street address, phone number, contact 
information and email address for both the company headquarters and any 
branch offices that will be applying for aluminum licenses. It is the 
responsibility of the applicant to keep the information up to date. 
This information will not be released by Commerce, except as required 
by U.S. law.


Sec.  361.103  Automatic issuance of import licenses.

    (a) In general. Aluminum import licenses will be issued to 
registered importers, customs brokers or their agents through an 
automatic aluminum import licensing system. The licenses will be issued 
automatically after the completion of the form.
    (b) Customs entry number. Filers are not required to report a 
Customs entry number to obtain an import license but are encouraged to 
do so if the Customs entry number is known at the time of filing for 
the license.
    (c) Information required to obtain an import license. (1) The 
following information is required to be reported in order to obtain an 
import license (if using the automatic licensing system, some of this 
information will be provided automatically from information submitted 
as part of the registration process):
    (i) Filer company name and address;
    (ii) Filer contact name, phone number, email address;
    (iii) Entry type (i.e., Consumption, FTZ);
    (iv) Importer name;
    (v) Exporter name;
    (vi) Manufacturer name (filer may state ``unknown'');
    (vii) Country of origin;
    (viii) Country of exportation;
    (ix) Expected date of export;
    (x) Expected date of import;
    (xi) Expected port of entry;
    (xii) Current Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) number (from Chapter 
76);
    (xiii) Country where the largest volume of primary aluminum used in 
the manufacture of the product was smelted (see paragraph (c)(3)(i) of 
this section);
    (xiv) Country where the second largest volume of primary aluminum 
used in the manufacture of the product was smelted (see paragraph 
(c)(3)(ii) of this section);
    (xv) Country where the product was most recently cast (see 
paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section);
    (xvi) Quantity (in kilograms); and
    (xvii) Customs value (US$).
    (2) Certain fields will be automatically filled out by the 
automatic license system based on information submitted by the filer 
(e.g., product category, unit value). Filers should review these fields 
to help confirm the accuracy of the submitted data.
    (3)(i) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(xiii) of this section:
    (A) The field in the license application requiring identification 
of the country where the largest volume of primary aluminum used in the 
manufacture of the product was smelted applies to the country where the 
largest volume of new aluminum metal is produced from alumina (or 
aluminum oxide) by the electrolytic Hall-H[eacute]roult process.
    (B) Filers may state ``not applicable'' for this field if the 
product contains only secondary aluminum and no primary aluminum. 
Secondary aluminum is defined as aluminum metal that is produced from 
recycled aluminum scrap through a re-melting process.
    (C) For license applications up to December 23, 2021, filers may 
state ``unknown'' for this field. Effective December 24, 2021, filers 
may not state ``unknown'' for this field.
    (ii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(xiv) of this section:
    (A) The field in the license application requiring identification 
of the country where the second largest volume of primary aluminum used 
in the manufacture of the product was smelted applies to the country 
where the second largest volume of new aluminum metal is produced from 
alumina (or aluminum oxide) by the electrolytic Hall-H[eacute]roult 
process.
    (B) Filers may state ``not applicable'' for this field if the 
product does not contain a second largest volume of primary aluminum or 
if the product contains only secondary aluminum and no primary 
aluminum. Secondary aluminum is defined as aluminum metal that is 
produced from recycled aluminum scrap through a re-melting process.
    (C) For license applications up to December 23, 2021, filers may 
state

[[Page 83816]]

``unknown'' for this field. Effective December 24, 2021, filers may not 
state ``unknown'' for this field.
    (iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(xv) of this section:
    (A) The field in the license application requiring identification 
of the country where the product was most recently cast applies to the 
country where the aluminum (with or without alloying elements) was last 
liquified by heat and cast into a solid state. The final solid state 
can take the form of either a semi-finished product (slab, billets or 
ingots) or a finished aluminum product.
    (B) Filers may not state ``not applicable'' for this field.
    (C) Filers may not state ``unknown'' for this field.
    (4) Upon completion of the form, the importer, customs broker or 
the importer's agent will certify as to the accuracy and completeness 
of the information and submit the form electronically. After refreshing 
the page, the system will automatically issue an aluminum import 
license number. The refreshed form containing the submitted information 
and the newly issued license number will appear on the screen (the 
``license form''). Filers can print the license form themselves only at 
that time. For security purposes, users will not be able to retrieve 
licenses themselves from the license system at a later date for 
reprinting. If needed, copies of completed license forms can be 
requested from Commerce during normal business hours.
    (d) Duration of the aluminum import license. The aluminum import 
license can be applied for up to 60 days prior to the expected date of 
importation and until the date of filing of the entry summary 
documents, or in the case of FTZ admissions, the filing of Customs Form 
214, or their electronic equivalents. With the exception of the 
licenses for FTZ admission (see Sec.  361.101(c)), the aluminum import 
license is valid for 75 days; however, import licenses that were valid 
on the date of importation but expired prior to the filing of entry 
summary data will be accepted.
    (e) Correcting submitted license information. Users will need to 
correct licenses themselves if they determine that there was an error 
submitted. To access a previously issued license, a user must log on 
with his username and identify the license number and the volume 
(quantity in kilograms) for the first product shown on the license. The 
information on the license should match the information presented in 
the entry summary data as closely as possible. This includes the value 
and quantity of the shipment, the expected date of importation, and the 
Customs port of entry.
    (f) Low-value licenses. There is one exception to the requirement 
for obtaining a unique license for each Customs entry. If the total 
value of the covered aluminum portion of an entry is less than $5,000, 
applicants may apply to Commerce for a low-value license that can be 
used in lieu of a single-entry license for low-value entries.


Sec.  361.104  Aluminum import monitoring.

    (a) Commerce will maintain an import monitoring system on the 
public AIM system website that will report certain aggregate 
information on imports of aluminum products obtained from the aluminum 
licenses and, where available, from publicly available U.S. import 
statistics. Aggregate data will be reported, as appropriate, on a 
monthly basis by country of origin, country of smelt, country of last 
cast, relevant aluminum product grouping, etc., and will include import 
quantity (metric tons), import Customs value (U.S. $), and average unit 
value ($/metric ton). The website will also contain certain aggregate 
data at the 6-digit Harmonized Tariff Schedule level and will also 
present a range of historical data for comparison purposes. Provision 
of aggregate data on the website may be revisited should concerns arise 
over the possible release of proprietary data.
    (b) Reported monthly import data will be refreshed each week, as 
appropriate, with new data on licenses issued during the previous week. 
This data will also be adjusted periodically for cancelled or unused 
aluminum import licenses, as appropriate. Additionally, outdated 
license data will be replaced, where available, with publicly available 
U.S. import statistics.


Sec.  361.105  [Reserved]


Sec.  361.106  Fees.

    No fees will be charged for obtaining a username, issuing an 
aluminum import license or accessing the aluminum import monitoring 
system.


Sec.  361.107  Hours of operation.

    The automatic licensing system will generally be accessible 24 
hours a day, 7 days a week but may be unavailable at selected times for 
server maintenance. If the system is unavailable for an extended period 
of time, parties will be able to obtain licenses from Commerce directly 
via email (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#57363b223a3e39223a793b3e343239243217232536333279303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bddcd1c8d0d4d3c8d093d1d4ded8d3ced8fdc9cfdcd9d893dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>) during regular business hours. 
Should the system be inaccessible for an extended period of time, 
Commerce would advise CBP to consider this as part of mitigation on any 
liquidated damage claims that may be issued.


Sec.  361.108  Loss of electronic licensing privileges.

    Should Commerce determine that a filer consistently files 
inaccurate licensing information or otherwise abuses the licensing 
system, Commerce may revoke its electronic licensing privileges without 
prior notice. The filer will then only be able to obtain a license 
directly from Commerce. Because of the additional time needed to review 
such forms, Commerce may require up to 10 working days to process such 
forms. Delays in filing caused by the removal of a filer's electronic 
filing privilege will not be considered a mitigating factor by CBP.

[FR Doc. 2020-28166 Filed 12-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>