alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 244 (Friday, December 18, 2020)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 82869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28154]



[[Page 82867]]

Vol. 85

Friday,

No. 244

December 18, 2020

Part VI





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of December 16, 2020--Continuation of the National Emergency 
With Respect to Serious Human Rights Abuse and Corruption


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 85 , No. 244 / Friday, December 18, 2020 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 82869]]

                Notice of December 16, 2020

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Serious Human Rights Abuse and Corruption

                On December 20, 2017, by Executive Order 13818, the 
                President declared a national emergency with respect to 
                serious human rights abuse and corruption around the 
                world and, pursuant to the International Emergency 
                Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), took 
                related steps to deal with the unusual and 
                extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 
                policy, and economy of the United States.

                The prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and 
                corruption that have their source, in whole or in 
                substantial part, outside the United States, continue 
                to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the 
                national security, foreign policy, and economy of the 
                United States. For this reason, the national emergency 
                declared on December 20, 2017, must continue in effect 
                beyond December 20, 2020. Therefore, in accordance with 
                section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 
                U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the 
                national emergency declared in Executive Order 13818 
                with respect to serious human rights abuse and 
                corruption.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    December 16, 2020.

[FR Doc. 2020-28154
Filed 12-17-20; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3295-F1-P
#### § 77.507 Electric equipment; switches.

All electric equipment shall be provided with switches or other controls that are safely designed, constructed, and installed.
EXHIBIT 3.7

                             AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS OF

                        WESTERN INTERNATIONAL PIZZA CORP.


         The following amendment to the Bylaws of Western International Pizza
Corp. was adopted by unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of the Company
on the 20th day of April, 2000:

         Section 2.11 Written Consent to Action by Stockholders. Any action
which may be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders may be taken
without a meeting and without prior notice, if one or more consents in writing,
setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of outstanding
shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary
to authorize or take the action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to
vote thereon were entitled to be present and to vote.

         I, Luke Bradley, Secretary of Western International Pizza Corp., hereby
certify that the foregoing Amendment to the Bylaws of Western International
Pizza Corp. was duly adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors on the 20th
Day of April, 2000.


                                             /s/ Luke Bradley
                                            ---------------------
                                            Luke Bradley
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sarah Fishman, Respondent, v. Lousan General Construction Corp. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Decedent was a carpenter. He was working on an eight-foot high ceiling, standing on a platform of boards mounted on horses with cross pieces usable as steps. He was alone in the room arid had apparently completed the nailing of a plate to the ceiling. He was found dead with his head wedged between two studs, one leg on the step of the horse and the other extending upward supported by the horse. There were no cuts, bruises or other external signs of injury. Death was due to atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries with myocardial infarction. There is no proof of unusual exertion connected with his death. One physician speculated on the possibility that decedent may have lost his balance because of the *“*precarious ” place in which he worked and in the course of falling “ sustained such a severe emotional shock that it precipitated a fatal myocardial infarction”. That decedent lost Ms balance is speculation in a field, not of medicine, but of generalized occurrences in which a physician has no special competence. The presumption which attaches *888to unwitnessed accidents resulting in death is here effectively. overcome by proof that the only cause of death is a natural cause. No injury resulting from the fall is shown from which it might be inferred that the fall came first and the impact hastened death or affected the physical condition of the decedent. The lack of any physical consequences such as bruise or bleeding, from the fall indicates that the decedent was dead when his head struck the studs. The ease is governed by our decision in *Matter of Commissioner of Taxation é Finance*v. *Jordan Bros.*(279 App. Div. 1123), to which it is closely similar; and seems also to be within the general rule affecting presumptions laid down in *Matter of McCormack*v. *National City Bank of N. Y.*(303 N. Y. 5). Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
### §3975. Policy restrictions

#### (a) Dividends

While a policy is protected under this subchapter, a dividend or other monetary benefit under a policy may not be paid to an insured or used to purchase dividend additions without the approval of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. If such approval is not obtained, the dividends or benefits shall be added to the value of the policy to be used as a credit when final settlement is made with the insurer.

#### (b) Specific restrictions

While a policy is protected under this subchapter, cash value, loan value, withdrawal of dividend accumulation, unearned premiums, or other value of similar character may not be available to the insured without the approval of the Secretary. The right of the insured to change a beneficiary designation or select an optional settlement for a beneficiary shall not be affected by the provisions of this subchapter.

(Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, title IV, §405, as added Pub. L. 108–189, §1, Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2853.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 545 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 405 of act Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, art. IV, 54 Stat. 1184; Oct. 6, 1942, ch. 581, §13, 56 Stat. 775; Pub. L. 102–12, §9(16), Mar. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 40, related to deduction of unpaid premiums upon settlement of policies maturing during protection, prior to the general amendment of this Act by Pub. L. 108–189. See section 3976 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to any case not final before Dec. 19, 2003, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–189, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.
#### § 585.117 Severability.

If a court holds any provisions of this part or their applicability to any persons or circumstances invalid, the remainder of the provisions and their applicability to any persons or circumstances will not be affected.
#### § 942.828 Special performance standards—In situ processing.

Part 828 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—In Situ Processing,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations which include the in situ processing of coal.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Harry W. Graff, Inc., Appellant, and Cirker's Moving and Storage Co., Inc., Respondent.

Order, entered on September 19, 1960, denying petitioner’s motion to stay arbitration unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur —Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
#### § 887.15 Grant administration requirements and procedures.

The requirements and procedures for grant administration set forth in part 885 of this chapter for reclamation grants to certified States and Indian tribes or in part 886 of this chapter for reclamation grants to uncertified States and Indian tribes must be used for subsidence insurance funds in grants.

[73 FR 67647, Nov. 14, 2008]
FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of

                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



                         For the month of November 2002


                               Luxfer Holdings PLC

                   The Victoria, Harbour City, Salford Quays,
                                Manchester M5 2SP


         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

         Form 20 F...X.............       Form 40 F...............



         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to
the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

         Yes.......................       No........X.............


         If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule
12g3-2(b): 82- ..............................................

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                             Luxfer Holdings PLC

                                             By: /s/ Linda F. Seddon
                                                 --------------------------
                                             Name: Linda F. Seddon
                                             Title: Company Secretary

Dated:  November 7, 2002

<PAGE>


Exhibit Index

1. Luxfer Holdings PLC Announcement to Bondholders & Analysts: Financial Results
for the Nine Months Ended 30 September 2002
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1415-C
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Distribution of stratified-drift aquifers—PLATE 3

Kontis, A.L, and others, 2004, Regional hydrology and simulation of flow
in stratified-drift aquifers in the glaciated northeastern United States

83° ye e me or ee ee co e e jo . 6r°

asi 3uiNn

i pe
oe

—! .

on
- —--—--

—— LAKE ONTARIO

ATLANTIC
OCEAN |

x D
aay
ein i
a5 Xs i
(s PUFNAM *, ©
- i | Jf tp TM arity
15 d T | 5 CY “¢ Taek, ot
~ ef: “59) aay

; = “i ; , eg . _-
mel: . oar RA Se Sy i |e
156) a5 . whe (oc an a wf ; A360 KLAND é 0) alia |
es ff - } BN -
ye

wry
2

LACKAWANNA

T6149) “}-55.2149)

i
Rite ne

MEDINA

i
~ Sti
ino Wh i
rt Ae

“RA Aa
Aly

: in

eo
4

<9 \ \ ! \ L \
75° i T° TR 7m 70° 69° 68°

DISTRIBUTION OF STRATIFIED-DRIFT AQUIFERS IN THE GLACIATED NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES

By
D.H. Tepper and T.S. Miller
2004

oe Bie 80°
Base map from U.S. Geological Survey digital data, 1:2,000,000, NAD 1927, Lambert conformal projection, standard parallels at 41°15' and 46°15’, central meridian at 74°15"
Opinion issued November 10, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 16
- 00 7 98
- CV

——————————— IN RE VERONICA LOWE , Relator

O rigi n al Proceeding on Petition f o r Writ o f Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Veronica Lowe , ha s filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

c ontending that respondent, the Honorable Judy Warne, has refused to sign an order transferring a suit affecting the parent

- child relationship and seeking issuance of a writ directing respondent to sign an order transferring the proceeding to Lubbock County

. 1

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of T.L.

- B. and P.L.

- B. , C ause N o. 20 1 5

- 46034 , in the 2 5 7 th District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Judy Warne presiding.2

We deny the petition and vacate our October 7, 2016 order staying the trial court proceedings

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and B land

.
#### § 912.845 Civil penalties.

Part 845 of this chapter, *Civil Penalties,* shall apply when civil penalties are assessed for violations on surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Danny Musacchio, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, rendered April 17, 1961 after trial, convicting him of criminally buying and receiving stolen property as a misdemeanor (Penal Law, § 1308), and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and information dismissed. The evidence was insufficient to establish the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard Harris, Appellant.

Order, entered September 11, 1959, denying without a hearing defendant’s motion for a writ of error *coram nobis,*reversed, on the law, and proceeding remanded for a hearing. Upon the present record we are constrained to hold that the defendant’s claims are not *“*conclusively refuted by unquestionable documentary proof”. *(People*v. *Bichetti,*302 N. Y. 290, 296.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.; Valente, J., dissents and votes to affirm in the following memorandum: I dissent and would affirm. On five previous occasions the defendant has unsuccessfully moved to vacate the judgment convicting him of murder, second degree, because he was not represented by counsel of his own choosing. On this, his sixth application, apparently he has found the open sesame — an allegation that he was fraudulently induced by court officers to execute an affidavit of no means and request for the appointment of counsel to defend him on the charge of murder, first degree. With this history of prior applications and the chronology of the indorsements on the indictment — all of which the District Attorney would have been well advised to have included in an opposing affidavit — greater factual support should be required in a petition made 21 years after the event before directing a hearing. What transpired on the arraignment in 1939 is so obvious as not to require any comment. Suffice it to state that if the defendant had an attorney, ready and willing to appear and defend him, all that was necessary was the filing of a notice of appearance. The absence thereof conclusively refutes defendant’s allegation that the Judge, then presiding, dismissed his attorney. We should not lend encouragement to such obviously disingenuous claims by dignifying them to the extent of directing useless hearings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       703078
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     142955
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          152101
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        235122
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   67552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1300808
<COMMON>                                        102180
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       213775
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              58588
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  374543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            27721
<PREFERRED>                                       6900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            330297
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        70766
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    72520
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  418061
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1300808
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       139306
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                              6585
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      114230
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      120815
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          18491
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                2758
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   21249
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          9557
<NET-INCOME>                                     11692
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        576
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    11116
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          8481
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                         7682
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           26429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1648.7 Procedures upon transfer for classification.

A board to which a registrant is transferred for classification shall classify the registrant in the same manner it would classify a registrant assigned to it. When the classification has been decided by the transfer board, the file will be returned to the local board of jurisdiction in the manner prescribed by the Director.

[47 FR 4661, Feb. 1, 1982]
#### § 1801.3 Contact for general information and requests.

For general information on this part, to inquire about the Privacy Act program at NACIC, or to file a Privacy Act request, please direct your communication in writing to the Information and Privacy Coordinator, Executive Secretariat Office, National Counterintelligence Center, 3W01 NHB, Washington, DC 20505. Requests with the required identification statement pursuant to § 1801.13 must be filed in original form by mail. Subsequent communications and any inquiries will be accepted by mail or facsimile at (703) 874-5844 or by telephone at (703) 874-4121. Collect calls cannot be accepted.
#### D’AMATTO, Appellant, v. URBAN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Action by Joseph D'Amatto against Wenzel C. Urban.

No opinion. Order affirmed on argument, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### PEOPLE, ex rel. BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO., Appellant, v. FEITNER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people, on the relation of the Brooklyn Union Gas Company, against Thomas L. Feitner and others, constituting the board of taxes and assessments of the city of New York.

No opinion. Motion to amend order of reversal granted.
#### SNIDER, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Amy Snider against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. C. F. Brown, for appellant. P. D. Trafford, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment modified, by striking out extra allowance, and judgment, as so reduced to the sum of $3,257.90, and order appealed from, affirmed, with costs of appeal.

VAN BRUNT, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, J:, dissent.
### §4814. Administration of export controls

#### (a) In general

The President shall rely on, including through delegations, as appropriate, the Secretary, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Energy, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of other Federal agencies as appropriate, to exercise the authority to carry out the purposes set forth in subsection (b).

#### (b) Purposes

The purposes of this section include to—

(1) advise the President with respect to—

(A) identifying specific threats to the national security and foreign policy that the authority of this subchapter may be used to address; and

(B) exercising the authority under this subchapter to implement policies, regulations, procedures, and actions that are necessary to effectively counteract those threats;

(2) review and approve—

(A) criteria for including items on, and removing such an item from, a list of controlled items established under this subchapter;

(B) an interagency procedure for compiling and amending any list described in subparagraph (A);

(C) criteria for including a person on a list of persons to whom exports, reexports, and in-country transfers of items are prohibited or restricted under this subchapter;

(D) standards for compliance by persons subject to controls under this subchapter; and

(E) policies and procedures for the end-use monitoring of exports, reexports, and in-country transfers of items controlled under this subchapter; and

(3) benefit from the inherent equities, experience, and capabilities of the Federal officials described in subsection (a).

#### (c) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that the administration of export controls under this subchapter should be consistent with the procedures relating to export license applications described in Executive Order 12981 (1995).

(Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVII, §1755, Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsecs. (b)(1), (2) and (c), was in the original "this part", meaning part I (§§1751–1768) of subtitle B of title XVII of div. A of Pub. L. 115–232, known as the Export Controls Act of 2018, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of part I to the Code, see section 1751 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a Short Title note under section 4801 of this title and Tables.

Executive Order 12981, referred to in subsec. (c), is Ex. Ord. No. 12981, Dec. 5, 1995, 60 F.R. 62981, which is set out as a note under former section 4603 of this title.