alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1035 

Recognizing the significance of the Greensboro Four sit-in during Black 

History Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 29, 2024 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself, Ms. MANNING, Mrs. FOUSHEE, Mr. JACKSON of 

North Carolina, Mr. NICKEL, Ms. NORTON, Mr. VEASEY, Ms. LEE of 

California, Ms. TLAIB, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. GOLDMAN of New York, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. CARSON, Ms. 

BROWN, Mr. ESPAILLAT, and Mr. IVEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the significance of the Greensboro Four sitin during Black History Month. 

Whereas, February 1, 2024, is the 64th anniversary of the 

Greensboro Four sit-in; 

Whereas, February 1, 2024, also marks the beginning of 

Black History month, and the United States celebration 

of the contributions of Black Americans to the Nation’s 

rich history and culture; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1035 IH 

Whereas Joseph McNeil, Jibreel Khazan (formerly Ezell 

Blair, Jr.), Franklin McCain, and David Richmond are 

the members of the Greensboro Four; 

Whereas the Greensboro Four attended North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University; 

Whereas the Greensboro Four were refused service at the 

F.W. Woolworth cafeteria in Greensboro, North Carolina, 

on February 1, 1960; 

Whereas the Greensboro Four ignited a movement to challenge racial inequality throughout the South; 

Whereas the Greensboro Four were joined by female students 

from Bennett College and Greensboro Women’s College; 

Whereas the sit-ins spread nationwide with over 700,000 people participating, including students, clergymen, and citizens, both White and Black; 

Whereas the protests resulted in more than 3,000 arrests; 

Whereas the Greensboro Four remained peaceful throughout 

the 6-month sit-in; and 

Whereas the Woolworth Lunch Counter was integrated on 

July 26, 1960: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the Greensboro Four for their 

3 contribution to the civil rights movement and the 

4 significant role they played as a catalyst for the mo5 bilization of college students in the civil rights move6 ment coalescing in the formation of the Student 

7 Non-Violent Coordinating Committee; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1035 IH 

1 (2) recognizes that ethnic and racial diversity of 

2 the United States enriches and strengthens the Na3 tion; 

4 (3) recognizes the continued importance of sit5 ins as an effective form of nonviolent resistance to 

6 spur positive social change; and 

7 (4) encourages all States to include in their 

8 educational curriculum the history and contributions 

9 of the Greensboro Four. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-1
PLATE 5

sal

GULF OF MEXICO

UPPER CLAIBORNE AQUIFER

sal

25

GULF OF MEXICO

MIDDLE WILCOX AQUIFER

BOUNDARY OF
STUDY AREA

25 80 KILOMETERS

BOUNDARY OF
STUDY AREA

0 25 80 KILOMETERS

BOUNDARY OF
‘STUDY AREA

25

50 MILES

GULF OF MEXICO 0 25 50 KILOMETERS

MIDDLE CLAIBORNE AQUIFER

44
ma ENTUCKY
Missour! Y
(fhe bis
o- BOUNDARY OF

STUDY AREA

33°

Era

0 Baton Rouge

50 MILES 50 MILES

GULF OF MEXICO 0 25 50 KILOMETERS

LOWER WILCOX AQUIFER

BOUNDARY OF
.— STUDY AREA

36° TENNESSEE

Brownsville

az

) 25 50 MILES

GULF OF MEXICO 0 25 50 KILOMETERS

LOWER CLAIBORNE-UPPER WILCOX AQUIFER

EXPLANATION

——200—— Potentiometric contour—Shows altitude
at which water level would stand in tightly
cased wells. Hachures indicate depression.
Contour interval 20 feet. Datum is sea
level

MAPS SHOWING SIMULATED PREDEVELOPMENT POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACES OF THE UPPER CLAIBORNE, MIDDLE CLAIBORNE,
LOWER CLAIBORNE-UPPER WILCOX, MIDDLE WILCOX, AND LOWER WILCOX AQUIFERS,
MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT AQUIFER SYSTEM, SOUTH-CENTRAL UNITED STATES
#### The People of the State of New York v. Laurence Carroll.

Motion to dismiss appeals from orders of the County Court, Bronx County, entered February 6, 1962 and February 29, 1962 granted. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
### §101331. Definitions

In this subchapter:

(1) Field employee.—The term "field employee" means—

(A) an employee of the Service who is exclusively assigned by the Service to perform duties at a field unit, and the members of the employee's family; and

(B) any other individual who is authorized to occupy Federal Government quarters under section 5911 of title 5, and for whom there is no feasible alternative to the provision of Federal Government housing, and the members of the individual's family.

(2) Primary resource values.—The term "primary resource values" means resources that are specifically mentioned in the enabling legislation for that field unit or other resource value recognized under Federal statute.

(3) Quarters.—The term "quarters" means quarters owned or leased by the Federal Government.

(4) Seasonal quarters.—The term "seasonal quarters" means quarters typically occupied by field employees who are hired on assignments of 6 months or less.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3126.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101331 | 16 U.S.C. 17o(19). | Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(a)(19), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4194. |

Section

The text of 16 U.S.C. 17o(19)(B) is omitted because the term "land management agency" is not used.
§ 939.842 Federal inspections. ( a ) Part 842 of this chapter, *Federal Inspections,* shall apply to all coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) The Secretary will furnish copies of inspection reports and reports of any enforcement action taken to the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management upon request.
#### JOHNSON, Appellant, v. KEYES et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Action by Addie L. Johnson, as administratrix, against Alanson C. Keyes and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.3    
  


        5360 South Cicero Avenue

Chicago, Illinois

("the Building") 


FIRST AMENDMENT 

March 27, 2002 



	

LANDLORD:	
 	

LaSalle Bank, National Association

LaSalle National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, as Trustee under Trust Agreement dated June 26, 1997 and known as Trust Number 123103-06 and not personally
	

TENANT:	
 	

Archibald Candy Corporation 1137 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, Illinois 60607
	

PREMISES:	
 	

An area containing 112,222 square feet of Rentable Area on the first (1st) floor of the Building, substantially as shown on Lease Plan, Exhibit 2, attached to the lease.
	

TERM COMMENCEMENT DATE:	
 	

July 1, 2000
	

TERMINATION DATE:	
 	

June 30, 2002
	

OPTION TERM TERMINATION DATE:	
 	

June 30, 2003
	

LEASE EXECUTION DATE:	
 	

July 1, 2000
	

PREVIOUS LEASE AMENDMENTS:	
 	

NONE
	

EXTENDED TERMINATION DATE:	
 	

June 30, 2004





        WHEREAS,
Tenant desires to extend the term of the lease for an additional period; 


        WHEREAS,
Landlord is willing to extend the term of the lease on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; 


        NOW
THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree that the above-described lease, as previously amended ("the Lease"), is hereby further amended as follows: 


1.    Extension of Term



        The
term of the Lease is hereby extended for an additional One- (1)-year term commencing as of July 1, 2003 and termination as of June 30, 2004.
Said additional terms shall be upon all of the same terms and conditions of the Original Lease, except that the Yearly Rent payable in respect of the one-year additional term shall be as
follows: 



	Annual Rent	 	Monthly Rent
	$282,802.46	 	    $23,566.87






2.    Option Term


        Tenant
shall have the option to extend the terms of this agreement for three (3) one (1) year terms at the monthly rental amount which will be 102.0% greater than the
previous years monthly rent and provided that the Tenant delivers writing notice of its intent to extent the agreement to the Landlord 180 days prior to the expiration of the previous years
term. 


3.    Heading



        Title
and paragraph headings are for reference purposes and for convenience of the parties only and shall have no bearing upon nor force or effect in respect of the interpretation and
application of the substantive provisions in this Fifth Amendment contained. 


        As
hereby amended, the Lease is ratified, confirmed, and approved in all aspects. 





 



        WHEREFORE,
the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the date first above written. 



	LANDLORD:	 	TENANT:
	

LaSalle Bank, National Association, as trustee aforesaid and not personally	
 	

Archibald Candy Corporation

1137 West Jackson Blvd.

Chicago, Illinois 60607
	

By:	

/s/ Illegible
 Trust Officer	
 	

By:	

/s/ Alan W. Petrick
 Alan W. Petrik—Vice President

Hereunto Duly Authorized
	

Date Signed: 7-16-02                      	
 	

Dated Signed: 6/1/02                      




2









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.3
MARYLAND 

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

REVISION # 15 – 05 Modify

Continuous Opacity Monitors and 

Miscellaneous 

Amendments to COMAR 26.11.01.10

02/12/2016

Prepared by:

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230

410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101 • www.mde.state.md.us
#### § 1699.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
#### (A) Lyons National Bank, Respondent, v. Harrie B. Moore, Appellant. (B) Robert Warner, Appellant, v. Laurence Kenan, Respondent. Ronnie Days, Appellant, v. Laurence Kenan, Respondent. (C) In the Matter of Thomas P. Birmingham, Petitioner, v. William S. Hults, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Respondent. (D) Albert E. Bartlett, Respondent, v. Town oe Geddes et al., Appellants. (E) Thomas Manitta, Respondent, v. Town of Geddes et al., Appellants. (F) Coastal Commercial Corp., Respondent, v. Samuel Kosoff & Son, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-*997Appellant. Lincoln National Bank and Trust Co. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants. (G) Nellie C. Crawford, Respondent, v. Town of Hamburg, Appellant. (H) Virginia Haynos, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. Clara Krupczyk, Appellant.

[In each action] Appeal dismissed unless records and briefs are filed on or before March 1, 1961. Respondent’s brief must be filed on or before March 16, 1961 if appeal is to be argued at March 1961 Term.
### **CHAPTER 15—POLITICAL ACTIVITY OF CERTAIN STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES**

Sec.
1501.
Definitions.
1502.
Influencing elections; taking part in political campaigns; prohibitions; exceptions.
1503.
Nonpartisan candidacies permitted.
1504.
Investigations; notice of hearing.
1505.
Hearings; adjudications; notice of determinations.
1506.
Orders; withholding loans or grants; limitations.
1507.
Subpenas and depositions.
1508.
Judicial review.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1974**—Pub. L. 93–443, title IV, §401(b)(2), Oct. 15, 1974, 88 Stat. 1290, substituted "candidacies" for "political activity" in item 1503.
§ 1901.51 Limitations on disclosure. No record which is within a system of records shall be disclosed by any means of communication to any individual or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains, unless disclosure of the record would be: ( a ) To those officers and employees of this Agency which maintains the record who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties;
( b ) Required under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552;
( c ) For a routine use as defined in § 1901.02(m), as contained in the Privacy Act Issuances Compilation which is published biennially in the Federal Register, and as described in §§ (a)(7) and (e)(4)(D) of the Act;
( d ) To the Bureau of the Census for purposes of planning or carrying out a census or survey or related activity pursuant to the provisions of U.S.C. Title 13;
( e ) To a recipient who has provided the Agency with advance adequate written assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred in a form that is not individually identifiable;
( f ) To the National Archives and Records Administration as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government, or for evaluation by the Archivist of the United States or designee to determine whether the record has such value;
( g ) To another agency or to an instrumentality of any governmental jurisdiction within or under the control of the United States for a civil or criminal law enforcement activity if the activity is authorized by law, and if the head of that agency or instrumentality has made a written request to the CIA specifying the particular information desired and the law enforcement activity for which the record is sought;
( h ) To a person pursuant to a showing of compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of an individual if upon such disclosure notification is transmitted to the last known address of such individual;
( i ) To either House of Congress, or, to the extent of matter within its jurisdiction, any committee or subcommittee thereof, any joint committee of Congress or subcommittee of any such joint committee;
( j ) To the Comptroller General or any of his authorized representatives in the course of the performance of the duties of the General Accounting Office; or
( k ) To any agency, government instrumentality, or other person or entity pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction of the United States or constituent states.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

 

The Board of Directors

Lancer Corporation:

 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements(Nos. 333-36393 and 333-47998) on Form S-8 of Lancer Corporation of ourreport dated February 26, 2003, relating to the consolidated balancesheets of Lancer Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and related consolidatedfinancial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31,2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Lancer Corporation.

 

Our report refers to a change in the Company’s method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Antonio, TexasMarch 26, 2003

----
# C_2010037EN.01004801.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/48

---

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2009 — Enviro Tech Europe and Enviro Tech International v Commission

(Case T-422/03) (1)

1

2010/C 37/69

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 47, 21.2.2004.

1

---
Before the United States Department of Transportation 

August 20, 2014 

Essential Air Service at 

ATHENS, GEORGIA Docket OST -2002-11348 

Under49 U.S.C. 41731 etseq. 

NOTICE OF INTENT OF SEAPORT AIRLINES, INC. 

TO TERMINATE ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE (EAS) AT 

ATHENS, GEORGIA 

SeaPort Airlines, Inc. ("SeaPort"), pursuant to Part 323 of the Department's 

regulations, hereby provides notice of its intention to discontinue subsidized scheduled air 

service between Athens, Georgia ("Athens") and Nashville, Tennessee ("Nashville") on 

September 30, 2014. 

By Order 2012-9-27, the Department selected SeaPort to provide subsidized 

Essential Air Service ("EAS") at Athens for a two-year period ending on September 30, 

2014. 

By Order 2014-6-6, the Department determined that Athens was no longer eligible to 

receive subsidized EAS due to enplanement levels averaging below 10 or more passengers 

per service day during the 12 month period ending September 30, 2013 and as required by 

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 amended 49 U.S.C. § 41731 (a)(1)(b). The 

community requested no waiver from this determination. 

The discontinuance of service by SeaPort at Athens will leave the community with no 

scheduled air service. Prior to the end of service, SeaPort will contact any passengers 

booked for travel on or after October 1, 2014 and provide a full refund of any unused tickets, 

without penalty and provide assistance in making alternative travel arrangements. 
SeaPort Airlines, Inc. 

Notice of Intent to Terminate EAS at Athens, GA 

Page 2 of 2 

Any objections to the notice provided herein must be made within twenty (20) days 

from the date of this filing, in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 323.9 and 323.10. SeaPort will 

make all required notifications as outlined in 15 C.F.R. § 323.7. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Timothy Sieber 

Executive Vice President 

SeaPort Airlines, Inc. 

7505 NE Airport Way 

Portland International Airport 

Portland, Oregon 97218 

Office: (971) 340-1716 

email: tsieber@seaportair.com 

DATE: August 20, 2014
#### § 725.19 Audit.

The agency shall arrange for an independent audit no less frequently than once every two years, pursuant to the requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102, Attachment P. The audits will be performed in accordance with the “Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions” and the “Guidelines for Financial and Compliance Audits of Federally Assisted Programs” published by the Comptroller General of the United States and guidance provided by the cognizant Federal audit agency.

[48 FR 38490, Aug. 31, 1983]
# C_2010011EN.01003801.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/38

---

Order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2009 — Nestlé v OHIM — Quick (QUICKY)

(Case T-74/04) (1)

1

2010/C 11/70

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.

1

---
§ 155.3 Definitions. ( a ) *Applicant.* Any U.S. citizen who holds or requires a security clearance or any immigrant alien who holds or requires a limited access authorization for access to classified information needed in connection with his or her employment in the private sector; any U.S. citizen who is a direct-hire employee or selectee for a position with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and who holds or requires NATO certificates of security clearance or security assurances for access to U.S. or foreign classified information; or any U.S. citizen nominated by the Red Cross or United Service Organizations for assignment with the Military Services overseas. The term “applicant” does not apply to those U.S. citizens who are seconded to NATO by U.S. Departments and Agencies or to U.S. citizens recruited through such Agencies in response to a request from NATO.
( b ) *Clearance Decision.* A decision made in accordance with this part concerning whether it is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant an applicant a security clearance for access to Confidential, Secret, or Top Secret information. A favorable clearance decision establishes eligibility of the applicant to be granted a security clearance for access at the level governed by the documented need for such access, and the type of investigation specified for that level in 32 CFR part 154. An unfavorable clearance decision denies any application for a security clearance and revokes any existing security clearance, thereby preventing access to classified information at any level and the retention of any existing security clearance.
### §2906. Oath; custody

The oath of office taken by an individual under section 3331 of this title shall be delivered by him to, and preserved by, the House of Congress, agency, or court to which the office pertains.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 412.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 21. | R.S. §1759. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40142

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN JOSE GOMEZ-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CR-146-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Juan Jose Gomez-Lopez

raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. MartinezLugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir. 2015), petition for cert. filed (June 19, 

2015) (No. 14-10355). In Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d at 204-05, we held that an 

enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior conviction of a drug 

trafficking offense is warranted regardless whether the conviction for the prior 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40142 Document: 00513242007 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
No. 15-40142

2

offense required proof of remuneration or commercial activity. Accordingly, 

the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the 

district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-40142 Document: 00513242007 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015