alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85654-85655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4559-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 85655]]

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-4559-DR), dated August 28, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 7, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of August 28, 2020.

    Acadia, Grant, Natchitoches, Vermilion, and Winn Parishes for 
Public Assistance [Category A] (already designated for Individual 
Assistance and assistance for emergency protective measures 
[Category B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public 
Assistance program.)

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-28729 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
C. A. No. 77-62.

#### State *v.*Terry Scott.

*Julius C. Michael-son,*Attorney General, for plaintiff.

*William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Barbara Hurst, John A. MacFadyen III,*Asst. Public Defenders, for defendant.

The defendant’s

motion to withdraw his appeal is granted.
M. P. No. 77-114.

#### Thomas A. McCormick *v.*State Board of Elections *et al.*

*Keven A. McKenna,*for petitioner.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Stephen F. Achille,*for respondents.

This case is assigned to the calendar for April 18, 1977, at 9:30 a.m., for oral argument.

The briefs of all parties shall be filed by April 15, 1977. If a reply brief is necessary, it may be filed on April 18, 1977, previous to oral argument.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



David J. NobleDavid J. Noble Chairman/Director And Principal Executive Officer  11-11-2003Date
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Hoffman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL J.
HOFFMAN                               
|Michael J. Hoffman President and Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6720

ASHLEY W. CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

L. TODD LEE, False Prophet; RODNEY K.

PRITCHARD, FBI Agent in Columbia; MARTIN D.

BROWN, FBI Agent in Greenville; MARK MOORE,

Assistant United States Attorney; WILLIAM

CATOE, United States Magistrate Judge; DAVID

PLOWDEN, Assistant Federal Public Defender in

Greenville; JOHN H. HARE, Assistant Federal

Public Defender in Columbia,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-02-779-2-20-AJ)

Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 29, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ashley W. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ashley W. Carter appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Carter v. Lee, No. CA-02-779-2-20-AJ (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2002). We

also deny Carter’s motions to recuse Judges Herlong and Catoe and

for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
June 13, 1977.

M. P. No. 75-195.

#### New England Telephone and Telegraph Company *v.*Public Utilities Commission *et al.*

*Tillinghast, Collins & Graham, Peter J. McGinn, Louise Durfee,*for plaintiff.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Gregory L. Benik,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for defendants.

Defendants’ motion to withdraw their motion to *show cause*is granted.
### §4026. Business or trade obligations

#### (a) Availability of non-business assets to satisfy obligations

If the trade or business (without regard to the form in which such trade or business is carried out) of a servicemember has an obligation or liability for which the servicemember is personally liable, the assets of the servicemember not held in connection with the trade or business may not be available for satisfaction of the obligation or liability during the servicemember's military service.

#### (b) Relief to obligors

Upon application to a court by the holder of an obligation or liability covered by this section, relief granted by this section to a servicemember may be modified as justice and equity require.

(Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, title VII, §706, as added Pub. L. 108–189, §1, Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2865.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 596 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to any case not final before Dec. 19, 2003, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–189, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Kehoe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of MS Structured Asset Corp.
on behalf of SATURNS Trust No. 2002-14;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National
Association and its officers and agents.



                                                   By: /s/ John Kehoe
                                                      ----------------------
                                                   Name:  John Kehoe
                                                   Title: Vice President
                                                   Date:  February 27, 2004
### SUBCHAPTER IV—UPPER ATMOSPHERE RESEARCH
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1005 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of local print and digital journalism to the continued welfare, 

transparency, and prosperity of government at every level and the continuation and freedom of the United States as it is known today. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2024 

Mr. DESAULNIER (for himself, Mr. RASKIN, and Ms. NORTON) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 

and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of local print and digital journalism 

to the continued welfare, transparency, and prosperity 

of government at every level and the continuation and 

freedom of the United States as it is known today. 

Whereas local print and digital journalism is disappearing at 

a record rate; 

Whereas trust in journalists is at an all-time low nationally, 

while many local reporters retain the good will and trust 

of their communities; 

Whereas subscriptions to local news have decreased steadily 

since the spread of the internet; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1005 IH 

Whereas nonjournalistic digital media has been falsely labeled 

and marketed as news; 

Whereas corporations are buying local news outlets and cutting budgets and staff, leading to less local coverage; 

Whereas local print and digital journalism are essential to 

promoting good governance at the local and State level; 

and 

Whereas a lack of local news will allow for greater local and 

statewide political corruption: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) it is in the best interests of Federal, State, 

4 and local governments to make all possible efforts to 

5 ensure the continuation of robust local digital and 

6 print news sources; and 

7 (2) Congress should work with news outlets and 

8 other relevant stakeholders to ensure that local dig9 ital and print news continues to operate in a robust 

10 manner for years to come. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________

Project No.: 0172.09.029.041 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam Electric Rulemaking

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call

Date: 10/13/2011 Time: 10:30 AM

Company Name: Northern States Power Co (Sherburne County

 Power Plant)

Contact Name: Mary Dieltz

Phone No.: 763-261-3124

Name: TJ Finseth, Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : Sherburne County’s FGMC System

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called Ms. Dieltz with Northern States Power Co on October 13, 2011 to discuss the flue gas mercury control 

(FGMC) system at Sherburne County for Unit 3. Ms. Dieltz confirmed that for Unit 3, the plant operates an 

activated carbon injection system upstream of a dry FGD system and that the FGD solids, fly ash, and mercuryimpregnated carbon are collected in a baghouse and stored in a landfill. Ms. Dieltz confirmed that there is no 

wastewater from this operation.

Ms. Dieltz stated that for Units 1 and 2, they are planning to install an activated carbon injection system by 

December 2014. The units currently have a venturi water scrubber as the particulate control system. The 

scrubber does achieve some removal of sulfur dioxide from the calcium in the ash, but the plant does not use 

lime or limestone within the scrubber. Therefore, the wastewater from the scrubber is similar to a fly ash sluice 

stream. The activated carbon injection system will be installed upstream of the water scrubber and therefore, the 

mercury-impregnated carbon will be captured and transferred with the fly ash sluice to a thickener for 

treatment. The solids from the thickener are sent to the slurry pond and the overflow from the pond is used as 

make up for the scrubber system. The overflow from the thickener is transferred to their pond system and 

eventually reused as make up to the scrubber system.

Ms. Dieltz stated that the plant is not a zero discharge plant because it is permitted to discharge cooling tower 

blowdown, but it is zero discharge for all other wastewaters.
# • SPA 19 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 167 C: Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Corrections (cont'd) RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 167 C Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV - Corrections 63 PR 28556-28753 May 26,1998 as amended at 63 PR 31266, June 8, 1998 (RCRA ClusterVIII, HSWA provisions)



# x e vaca e was es S ou remam as sown m e av 

### , ruemta es an STATEANALOG IS: ANALOGOUS STATE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERALRCRA CITA nON CITATION EQUIV- LESS MORE BROADER WAC 173-303- STRIN- STRIN- ALENT GENT GENT IN SCOPE 

### PART 268 - LAND DISPOSALRESTRICTIONS SUBPART A - GENERAL TREATMENT SURFACEThfPOUNDMENT EXEMPTION 140(2)(a) The State has incorporated40 CPR 268 by reference. The checklist entries were deleted to save space and paper. replace colon after "at least annually" with a semicolon; delete second 268.4(a)(2)(ii) sentence beginning with "However, residues which are" Note: On August 10, 1998 (63 FR 42580), a rule waspromulgated to clarify the correct adoption sequence of the May 4,1998 rule (63 FR 24596, CL 165), the May 26, 1998 rule (63 FR 28556, CL 167), and the June 29, 1998 (63 FR 35147) technical amendmentto the May 4, 1998 rule, as they relate to the organobromine production waste entries at 40 CFR 268.40 and 268.48. Subsequently, on April 9, 1999, the U.S. CourtofAppeals vacated the listing of these organobromine production wastes and in tum, the May 4, 1998; June 29, 1998; and August 10, 1998 rules have been withdrawn. If a State chooses to follow this vacatur, it should remove the vacated wastes in the tables at 40 CFR 268.40 and 268.48, as indicated in footnotes 3 and 4. If the vacaturis not followed by a State, then th t d t h ld . h . th M 26 1998 I' bl 40 CFR 268 40 d 268 48 

# •

APPENDIX

## vm TO PART 268 revise title; add in 140(2)(a) alphanumeric order Appendix

## vm End ofIBR X the entry for "NA" 

# •
### §101113. Gifts, devises, or bequests

(a) Authority To Accept Gifts, Devises, or Bequests.—

(1) In general.—The National Park Foundation may accept, receive, solicit, hold, administer, and use any gifts, devises, or bequests, either absolutely or in trust of real or personal property, or any income from, or other interest in, the gift, devise, or bequest, for the benefit of, or in connection with, the Service, its activities, or its services.

(2) Coordination with service.—Activities of the National Park Foundation under paragraph (1) shall be undertaken after consultation with the Director to ensure that those activities are consistent with the programs and policies of the Service.

(3) Gift, devise, or bequest that is encumbered, restricted, or subject to beneficial interests.—A gift, devise, or bequest may be accepted by the National Park Foundation even though it is encumbered, restricted, or subject to beneficial interests of private persons if any current or future interest in the gift, devise, or bequest is for the benefit of the Service, its activities, or its services.

(b) When Gift, Devise, or Bequest May Not Be Accepted.—The National Park Foundation may not accept any gift, devise, or bequest that entails any expenditure other than from the resources of the Foundation.

(c) Interest in Real Property.—For purposes of this section, an interest in real property includes easements or other rights for preservation, conservation, protection, or enhancement by and for the public of natural, scenic, historic, scientific, educational, inspirational, or recreational resources.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3120; Pub. L. 114–289, title IV, §401(2), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1488.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101113(a)(1) | 16 U.S.C. 19g (1st sentence words before proviso). | Pub. L. 90–209, §3, Dec. 18, 1967, 81 Stat. 656. |
| 101113(a)(2) | 16 U.S.C. 19g (last sentence). | |
| 101113(b) | 16 U.S.C. 19g (1st sentence proviso). | |
| 101113(c) | 16 U.S.C. 19g (2d sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (c), the words "among other things" are omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Subsec. (a)(2), (3). Pub. L. 114–289 added par. (2) and redesignated former par. (2) as (3).
#### § 912.707 Exemption for coal extraction incident to Government-financed highway or other construction.

Part 707 of this chapter, *Exemption for Coal Extraction Incident to Government-Financed Highway or Other Construction,* shall apply to surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                              6,406
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      10,905
<ALLOWANCES>                          377
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   17,804
<PP&E>                              7,268
<DEPRECIATION>                      5,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     20,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               5,895
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                               96
<OTHER-SE>                         14,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       20,186
<SALES>                            40,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   40,507
<CGS>                               8,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      32,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     7,960
<INCOME-TAX>                        3,277
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 4,683
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        4,683
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.43 
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.43
        

</TABLE>
From:	King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov
Sent:	Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:35 PM
To:	Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov
Cc:	Talcott.Fred@epamail.epa.gov; Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov; 
Nagelhout.Peter@epamail.epa.gov; horowitz.michael@epamail.epa.gov; 
Sorrels.Larry@epamail.epa.gov; Lamson.Amy@epamail.epa.gov
Subject:	SI RICE NESHAP cost breakout by subcategory
Attachments:	Existing SI RICE NESHAP cost breakdown by subcategory 7-28-10.xls


Cortney,
The attached spreadsheet shows the cost breakout by subcategory.
(See attached file: Existing SI RICE NESHAP cost breakdown by subcategory 7-
28-10.xls)

Melanie King
Energy Strategies Group
Sector Policies and Programs Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency

Mail Code D243-01
RTP, NC  27711

Phone:  (919) 541-2469
Fax:       (919) 541-5450
king.melanie@epa.gov
#### FINCH, Appellant, v. FAY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

Action by John Finch against Mary Fay. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Wm. R. Bronk, for appellant. M. J. Early, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

The evidence of the witness Fay supports the conclusion that the offer to remove the encroachment, made ostensibly in the defendant’s behalf, was definitely refused by the plaintiff’s agent, who stated that he would not conclude the loan in any event upon the basis of the application. There is nothing to show that the proposed lender had rejected the loan before this conversation took place, and the proof sufficiently indicates that it was while negotiations were still open that this offer was made and refused. The evidence of plaintiff’s agent’s proposal to make two loans, aggregating the amount applied for, instead of the single loan as agreed, was offered to show a refusal to perform the contract as made, and no attempt to vary the terms of the writing was in any way involved. The point that the justice erroneously admitted evidence of a later placing of this loan has no foundation in the record, since no evidence to this effect was actually brought out, and the question, when asked of a witness who had knowledge of the matter, was included. The judgment is supported by evidence which discloses the plaintiff’s refusal to make or to conclude the loan, with repudiation of the defendant’s offer of a marketable title, and there is no ground for our disturbing the determination in favor of the defendant. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Appeal No. 75-306.

#### Francis P. Jobin *v.*American Drilling & Boring Co.

*Vincent J. Chisholm,*for petitioner.

*Charles J. McGovern,*for respondent.

The respondent’s motion to file its brief out of time is granted.