alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008209EN.01003901.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/39

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2008 — Alitalia v Commission

(Case T-301/01) (1)

1

(State aid - Recapitalisation of Alitalia by the Italian authorities - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the common market - Decision taken following a judgment of the Court of First Instance annulling an earlier decision - Admissibility - Infringement of Article 233 EC - Infringement of Articles 87 EC and 88 EC - Conditions for authorising the aid - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

(2008/C 209/65)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Alitalia — Linee Aeree Italiane Spa (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, G. M. Roberti, G. Scassellati Sforzolini, F. Moretti and F. Sciaudone, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci, acting as Agent, and A. Abate and G. Conte, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2001/723/EC of 18 July 2001 concerning the recapitalisation of the company Alitalia (OJ 2001 L 271, p. 28).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Alitalia — Linee aeree italiane Spa to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Alitalia — Linee aeree italiane Spa to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 16.2.2002.

1

---
# C_2023254EN.01000201.xml

| 19.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11175 – IBERDROLA / GIC / NEOENERGIA TRANSMISSORA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 254/02)

On 13 July 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11175. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11175. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Hurst, Appellant.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file five copies of his brief and io serve one copy. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the January 1961 Term; appeal ordered to be placed on the calendar for said term. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 244 (Friday, December 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 82434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27870]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Notice of Public Meeting of the Arizona Advisory Committee

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 
(Commission) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a 
meeting via Webex of the Arizona Advisory Committee (Committee) to the 
Commission will be held at 1:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) Tuesday, February 
9, 2021 for the purpose of discussing the testimony received on the 
effects of COVID-19 on the Native American community.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 1:00 
p.m. Mountain Time.
Access Information: Register at: https://tinyurl.com/y2phyj2m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brooke Peery, Designated Federal 
Officer, (DFO) at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbd9cbdedec9c2fbcec8d8d8c995dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81e3f1e4e4f3f8c1f4f2e2e2f3afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a> or by phone at (202) 701-1376. 
Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by 
first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 and providing 
the Service with the conference call number and conference ID number.
    Members of the public are entitled to make comments during the open 
period at the end of the meeting. Members of the public may also submit 
written comments; the comments must be received in the Regional 
Programs Unit within 30 days following the meeting. Written comments 
may be mailed to the Western Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil 
Rights, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Suite 2010, Los Angeles, CA 
90012.
    Records and documents discussed during the meeting will be 
available for public viewing prior to and after the meetings at https://www.facadatabase.gov/FACA/FACAPublicViewCommitteeDetails?id=a10t0000001gzl2AAA. Please click on 
the ``Committee Meetings'' tab. Records generated from these meetings 
may also be inspected and reproduced at the Regional Programs Unit, as 
they become available, both before and after the meetings. Persons 
interested in the work of this Committee are directed to the 
Commission's website, https://www.usccr.gov, or may contact the 
Regional Programs Unit at the above email or street address.

Agenda

I. Welcome & Roll Call
II. Approval of Minutes
III. Discussion on Testimony
IV. Public Comment
V. Adjournment

    Dated: December 14, 2020.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2020-27870 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Surface Disturbance Restricted

Surface Disturbance Prohibited

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Sage-grouse Priority/Core Habitat Areas

Sage-grouse Connectivity Habitat Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2-3: Alternative E

Greater Sage-Grouse Surface 

Disturbance/Surface

Occupancy Restrictions
650

750

700

700

650

750

650

750

650

700

650

J O H A N N E S R D

W H IT E S T A R R D

B R U S S E L S R D

C O U N T Y H W Y-R D N

C O U N T Y H W Y-R D N

T R U W AY R D

C O U N T Y H W Y-K

S K E E T A V E

B R U S S E L S R D

L O V E R S L N

E G A R D N E R R D G A R D N E R R D

F O X L N

C E M E T E R Y R D

P L A IN V IE W R D

4 C O R N E R S R D

J O H A N N E S R D

W H IT E S T A R R D

B R U S S E L S R D

C O U N T Y H W Y-R D N

C O U N T Y H W Y-R D N

T R U W AY R D

C O U N T Y H W Y-K

S K E E T A V E

B R U S S E L S R D

L O V E R S L N

E G A R D N E R R D G A R D N E R R D

F O X L N

C E M E T E R Y R D

P L A IN V IE W R D

4 C O R N E R S R D

Sugar Creek

S

u

gar Creek

G R E E N B A Y

L A K E M I C H I G A N

White Star

Cemetery

White Star

Cemetery

Peshtigo

Harbor

Namur

Little

Sturgeon

Brussels

Oconto

East

Little

Sturgeon SW

Green

Bay (All

Water)

Oconto SE

Dyckesville

40'

42'

49

49

4

44°

47'

000

48

560

49

87°

65

63

62

30"

49

4

30"

44°

2

52'

47

42

49

49

4

49

49

000m

69

42

50'

4

66

43

40'

4

49

37'

45'

63

41

87°45' 42'

47'

30" 87°

45' 49

4 4

49

380

49

4

49

4

FEET

59

FEET

49

000

49

49

000 FEET 46 E

N

4

49

49

44°

57

67

65

49

49

59

47

N

E

64

30"

000m

67

61

30"

68

49

4 4

44

49

37'

30"

48

000

580 44° FEET

64

58

30"

50'

41

49

4 4

56

57

45

68

43

2

87°45'

350

49

4

49

000m 4

49

4

46 50

62

50

45

58

66

61

30"

52'

49

4 4

49

000m

69

56

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

LITTLE STURGEON SW, WI

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

LITTLE STURGEON SW QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 16T

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, July 2008

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 29 ́

9 MILS

4° 3 ́

72 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

16T

DQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Sbarro, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel G. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 30, 2009



|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel G. Montgomery                                                                                     
|Daniel G. Montgomery Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

NOTE: A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRATT HOTEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          28,067
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,496
<INVENTORY>                                      4,462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,909
<PP&E>                                         317,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,931
<BONDS>                                        328,570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           519
<OTHER-SE>                                    (138,934)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,116
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303,793
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  221,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,988
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,387)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,287)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Filed 1/3/23 Sheen v. Mirabella Investments Group CA2/8

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

KWANG K. SHEEN,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

MIRABELLA INVESTMENTS
GROUP, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent. B301718

Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. BC631510

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of

Los Angeles County, Patricia D. Nieto, Judge. Affirmed.

Los Angeles Center for Community Law and Action, Noah

Grynberg, Tyler Anderson, and Gina Hong for Plaintiff and

Appellant.

Gupta, Evans & Ayres, Ajay Gupta

, Chris S. Evans and

Jacob Ayres for Defendant and Respondent.

__________

__________2 This is Sheen IV

. Sheen I was our 2019 ruling that Wells Fargo Bank owed

Kwang Sheen no tort duty during contract negotiations. ( Sheen

v. Wells Fargo Bank (2019) 38 Cal.App.5th 346 ( Sheen I ).)

Sheen II was Sheen v. FCI Lender Services, Inc . ( Oct. 30,

2020, B297640 ) 2020 WL 6375020 [nonpub. opn.] and was against

a different defendant in the same home loan lawsuit. The force of

Sheen I ’s logic propelled victory for this different defendant.

Sheen III was our Supreme Court’s affirmance of Sheen I in

2022. ( Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2022) 12 Cal.5th 905

( Sheen III

).)

Sheen IV involves the same plaintiff Sheen, his same

lawyer, and their same second amended complaint in the same

home loan case, although now the appeal is against a different

but similarly situated defendant: Mirabella Investments Group,

LLC. (See Sheen I

, supra , 38 Cal.App.5th at pp. 349

– 350

[describing Mirabella’s role].)

Absent a tort duty, Sheen had no case against any of these

defendants. Sheen III annulled Sheen’s theory against them.

DISPOSITION

We affirm the judgment and award costs to the respondent.

WILEY, J.

We concur:

STRATTON, P. J. HARUTUNIAN, J. *

* Judge of the San Diego Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California

Constitution.
#### Augusta Gerlach, Administratrix, etc., Respondent, *v.*John H. Edelmeyer et al., Appellants.

(Argued January 27, 1882;

decided February 7, 1882.)

*Hugh Beamy*for appellant.

*Nathaniel O. Moak*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Rapallo, J., absent, and Finch and Tract,

JJ., not voting.

Judgment affirmed.
#### GROSS, Appellant, v. CARROLL et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by Joseph Gross against Lawrence F. Carroll and Daniel J. Carroll.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                           RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

         This Agreement is made as of the 1st day of January, 2002, between
SIFCO INDUSTRIES, INC. (the "Company") and _________________________
("Employee").

         1.       Grant.

                  (a)      Shares. Pursuant to the Company's Key Employee Share
Ownership Program, the Employee has been granted the right to receive _________
________________________ of the Company's common shares, subject to the
restrictions set forth in this Agreement (the "Shares"). Title to the Shares
will vest in the Employee in the number and as of the dates set forth below:

                           Date                   Number of Shares

                  (b)      Issuance of and Dividends on Shares. Certificates for
the Shares will be issued as soon as practicable after title to the Shares vests
with the Employee. The Shares will be legended certificates, subject to the
limitations set forth in paragraph 3 below. Prior to vesting of the Shares, the
Employee will not be entitled to dividends or voting rights with respect to such
Shares.

         2.       Forfeiture. In the event of the termination of the Employee's
employment with the Company or its subsidiaries for any reason, the Employee
shall forfeit the right to receive all Shares that have not yet vested under the
program as of the date of the termination.

         3.       Securities Laws. The issuance of all Shares provided for
herein have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The Employee
understands that the Shares are "restricted securities" as defined in Rule 144
of the Act and that any resale, transfer or other disposition of the Shares will
be accomplished only in compliance with Rule 144 of the Act or other applicable
rules and regulations thereunder. The Company will place on the certificates
evidencing the Shares an appropriate legend reflecting the foregoing and may
refuse to permit transfer of such certificates until it has been furnished with
satisfactory evidence of no violation of the Act or the rules and regulations
thereunder.

         4.       Assignment. This grant may not be assigned, transferred,
pledged or hypothecated and shall not be assignable by operation of law.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be
executed and the Employee has executed this Agreement all as of the date first
written above.

                                         SIFCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                         By ____________________________________

                                         _______________________________________
                                         EMPLOYEE

                                       1
Exhibit 99.01-Certification  of Chief Executive Officer

 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I,Gerald Nolan, Chief Executive Officer  of  OHANA ENTERPRISES, INC (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

   (1)  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which
        this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully
        complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of  1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Registrant.

Date: May 20, 2003

/s/Gerald Nolan
------------------
Gerald Nolan
Chief Executive Officer
#### §§ 1699.131-1699.139 [Reserved]
#### § 1618.4 Transmission of orders and other official papers to registrants.

Personnel of the Selective Service System will transmit orders or other official papers addressed to a registrant by handing them to him personally or mailing them to him to the current mailing address last reported by him in writing to the Selective Service System.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 31304 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

FELIPE MERCADO

- VELIZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:14

- CR

- 26

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felipe Mercado

Veliz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mercado

- Veliz h as not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2 2 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-31304 Document: 00513243053 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015No. 14

- 31304

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for lea ve to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-31304 Document: 00513243053 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015