alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1807.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
### **CHAPTER 3053—NATIONAL CENTER FOR PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING**

Sec.
305301.
Definitions.
305302.
National Center for Preservation Technology and Training.
305303.
Preservation Technology and Training Board.
305304.
Preservation grants.
305305.
General provisions.
305306.
Service preservation centers and offices.
§ 879.12 Procedures for acquisition. ( a ) An appraisal of all land or interest in land to be acquired shall be obtained by the OSM, State, or Indian tribe. The appraisal shall state the fair market value of the land as adversely affected by past mining.
( b ) When practical, acquisition shall be by purchase from a willing seller. The amount paid for land or interests in land acquired shall reflect the fair market value of the land or interests in land as adversely affected by past mining.
( c ) When necessary, land or interests in land may be acquired by condemnation. Condemnation procedures shall not be started until all reasonable efforts have been made to purchase the land or interests in lands from a willing seller.
( d ) The OSM, State, or Indian tribe which acquires land under this part shall comply, at a minimum, with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. 4601, *et seq.,* and 41 CFR part 114-50.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2007
the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 5, 2008
    By:
    /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBSAndrew F. JacobsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 5, 2008
    By:
    /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCHPhillip A. ReinschExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
### **CHAPTER 11—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT**

Sec.
1101.
Office of Personnel Management.
1102.
Director; Deputy Director; Associate Directors.
1103.
Functions of the Director.
1104.
Delegation of authority for personnel management.
1105.
Administrative procedure.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–454, title II, §201(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1119, substituted in chapter heading "OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT" for "ORGANIZATION", in item 1101 "Office of Personnel Management" for "Appointment of Commissioners", in item 1102 "Director; Deputy Director; Associate Directors" for "Term of office; filling vacancies; removal", in item 1103 "Functions of the Director" for "Chairman; Vice Chairman; Executive Director", in item 1104 "Delegation of authority for personnel management" for "Functions of Chairman", and in item 1105 "Administrative procedure" for "Boards of examiners".
#### § 905.764 Process for designating areas unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.

Part 764 of this chapter, *State Processes for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* pertaining to petitions, initial processing, hearing requirements, decisions, data base and inventory systems, public information, and regulatory responsibilities shall apply to surface coal mining operations beginning one year after the effective date of this program.
### §3583. Computations

A computation under this subchapter before reemployment is made in the same manner as if the employee had received basic pay, or basic pay plus additional pay in the case of a Congressional employee, at the rate at which it would have been payable had the employee continued in the position in which he was serving at the time of transfer.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 431.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 2333(c). | Aug. 28, 1958, Pub. L. 85–795, §4(c), 72 Stat. 961. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
Map 2-24: Alternative A

Areas Closed to Non-Energy Leasable Minerals

Related to Greater Sage Grouse Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

Closed to Leasing of Non-Energy

Leasable Minerals

Federal Non-Energy Leasable

Mineral Estate

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: Identified restrictions displayed on this map

represent the existing management actions

across Greater Sage Grouse core and connectivity

habitat only. Additional restrictions exist beyond the

boundaries of core and connectivity habitat.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1219 

Condemning the Biden Administration’s decision to pause certain arms 

transfers to Israel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2024 

Mr. MILLER of Ohio (for himself and Mr. MCCAUL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the Biden Administration’s decision to pause 

certain arms transfers to Israel. 

Whereas, on October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists launched a 

massive, unprovoked war on Israel, killing over 1,200 innocent people and taking over 240 hostages, including 

American citizens; 

Whereas since October 7, Israel has faced attacks by Iran 

and its proxies including Hezbollah, Hamas, and the 

Houthis, which have required significant military responses; 

Whereas under the terms of a 2016 Memorandum of Understanding, the United States provides Israel with $3.8 billion per year in security assistance and missile defense 

funding from fiscal years 2019 through 2028, which is 

subject to the approval of Congress; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1219 IH 

Whereas thus far in fiscal year 2024, Congress has enacted 

regular and supplemental legislation appropriating $12.5 

billion in security assistance and missile defense for 

Israel without any additional conditions; 

Whereas Congress plays a vital role in oversight and approval 

of direct commercial sales and foreign military sales to 

security partners around the world, including Israel; 

Whereas, in May 2024, it was reported that President Biden 

ordered a pause on certain defense articles ready for imminent delivery to Israel, without having consulted with 

Congress; and 

Whereas, on May 8, 2024, President Biden stated regarding 

Israel, ‘‘We’re not going to supply the weapons and artillery shells.’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the Biden Administration’s deci3 sion to pause certain arms transfers to Israel as 

4 Israel faces unprecedented threats from Iran and its 

5 proxies including Hezbollah, Hamas, and the 

6 Houthis; 

7 (2) calls on the Biden Administration to allow 

8 all previously approved arms transfers to Israel to 

9 proceed quickly to ensure that Israel can defend 

10 itself and defeat threats from Iran and its proxies 

11 including Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis; 

12 (3) calls on the Biden Administration to utilize 

13 all congressionally appropriated funds for security 

14 assistance for Israel as Congress intended; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1219 IH 

1 (4) stands with Israel as it defends itself 

2 against the barbaric war launched by Hamas and 

3 other terrorists; and 

4 (5) reaffirms Israel’s right to self-defense. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### §558. Imposition of sanctions; determination of applications for licenses; suspension, revocation, and expiration of licenses

(a) This section applies, according to the provisions thereof, to the exercise of a power or authority.

(b) A sanction may not be imposed or a substantive rule or order issued except within jurisdiction delegated to the agency and as authorized by law.

(c) When application is made for a license required by law, the agency, with due regard for the rights and privileges of all the interested parties or adversely affected persons and within a reasonable time, shall set and complete proceedings required to be conducted in accordance with sections 556 and 557 of this title or other proceedings required by law and shall make its decision. Except in cases of willfulness or those in which public health, interest, or safety requires otherwise, the withdrawal, suspension, revocation, or annulment of a license is lawful only if, before the institution of agency proceedings therefor, the licensee has been given—

(1) notice by the agency in writing of the facts or conduct which may warrant the action; and

(2) opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance with all lawful requirements.

When the licensee has made timely and sufficient application for a renewal or a new license in accordance with agency rules, a license with reference to an activity of a continuing nature does not expire until the application has been finally determined by the agency.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 388.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 1008. | June 11, 1946, ch. 324, §9, 60 Stat. 242. |

Statutes at Large

In subsection (b), the prohibition is restated in positive form.

In subsection (c), the words "within a reasonable time" are substituted for "with reasonable dispatch". The last two sentences are restated for conciseness and clarity and to restate the prohibition in positive form.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 558 of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees, was transferred to section 2209 of Title 7, Agriculture.
#### § 21.425 How does a DoD Component's authority flow to awarding and administering activities?

The Head of a DoD Component, or his or her designee, may delegate to the heads of contracting activities (HCAs) within the Component, that Component's authority to make and administer awards, to appoint grants officers and agreements officers (*see* §§ 21.435 through 21.450), and to broadly manage the DoD Component's functions related to assistance instruments. The HCA is the same official (or officials) designated as the head of the contracting activity for procurement contracts, as defined at 48 CFR 2.101. The intent is that overall management responsibilities for a DoD Component's functions related to nonprocurement instruments be assigned only to officials that have similar responsibilities for procurement contracts.
| Name of Subsidiary                                      |   | Jurisdiction of    Incorporation |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                                    |   |                             |
| Mankato      Citizens Telephone Company                 |   | Minnesota                        |
| Mid-Communications,      Inc.                           |   | Minnesota                        |
| Cable      Network, Inc.                                |   | Minnesota                        |
| Heartland      Telecommunications Company of Iowa, Inc. |   | Minnesota                        |
| Crystal      Communications, Inc.                       |   | Minnesota                        |
| National      Independent Billing, Inc.                 |   | Minnesota                        |
| Enventis      Telecom, Inc.                             |   | Minnesota                        |
| CP      Telecom Inc.                                    |   | Minnesota                        |

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RICHARD STEVEN RIESS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10070

D.C. No. 2:08-CR-00723-SRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Richard Steven Riess appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 24-month

sentence for perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1621 and falsely representing

himself to be a citizen of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911. 

FILED

APR 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10070

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Riess’ counsel has

filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief, but no

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### Anthony Del Mar v. David C. Thompson et al., as Commissioners of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor.

Motion to dispense with printing and for other relief granted to the extent of dispensing with the printing in the record of this proceeding the transcript of the testimony taken at the "hearing before the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor on condition that the original transcript of said testimony is filed with this court at the time of filing the printed record of the proceedings. The printed record and printed petitioner’s points are to be served and filed on or before December 6, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court. Respondents’ points are to be served and filed on or before December 22, 1960. The order of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor revoking petitioner’s license is stayed pending the hearing and determination of this proceeding. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
§ 1639.3 Basis for classification in Class 2-D. ( a ) In Class 2-D shall be placed any registrant who is preparing for the ministry under the direction of a recognized church or religious organization; and ( 1 ) Who is satisfactorily pursuing a full-time course of instruction required for entrance into a recognized theological or divinity school in which he has been pre-enrolled or accepted for admission; or
( 2 ) Who is satisfactorily pursuing a full-time course of instruction in a recognized theological or divinity school; or
( 3 ) Who, having completed theological or divinity school, is a student in a full-time graduate program or is a full-time intern, and whose studies are related to and lead toward entry into service as a regular or duly ordained minister of religion. Satisfactory progress in these studies as determined by the school in which the registrant is enrolled, must be maintained for qualification for the deferment.
( b ) The registrant's classification shall be determined on the basis of the written information in his file folder, oral statements, if made by the registrant at his personal appearance before a board, and oral statements, if made by the registrant's witnesses at his personal appearance.
[47 FR 4657, Feb. 1, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 24458, July 1, 1987]
#### In the Matter of Cheyenne QQ. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Franklin County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Donna RR., Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 752]—

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), entered April 7, 2006, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to *1045Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of two of respondent’s children.

The circumstances leading to the placement of two of respondent’s four children are set forth in our recent decision addressing an appeal from an earlier order in this proceeding (37 AD3d 977 [2007]). The current appeal must be dismissed. The order of placement from which respondent appeals has expired and a subsequent order was entered on consent. No appeal generally lies from a consent order *(see Matter of Forbus v Stolfi,*300 AD2d 852, 852 [2002], *lv dismissed*99 NY2d 642 [2003]; *cf. Matter of Leighton v Bazan,*36 AD3d 1178, 1179 [2007]). An appeal from an expired order that has been replaced by an order from which there is no appeal is moot *(see Matter of Jolyssa EE.,*28 AD3d 824, 825 [2006]; *Matter of Norbert YY.,*28 AD3d 815, 816 [2006]). The exception to the mootness doctrine is inapplicable. Moreover, we note that under the current consent order the children have been reunited with respondent as they are under a trial discharge to her home.

Mercure, J.E, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 23, 2020.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 9, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 86 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-43, CP2021-44.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2020-28445 Filed 12-22-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### §9811. Travel and transportation expenses of certain new appointees

(a) In this section, the term "new appointee" means—

(1) a person newly appointed or reinstated to Federal service to the Administration to—

(A) a career or career-conditional appointment or an excepted service appointment to a continuing position;

(B) a term appointment;

(C) an excepted service appointment that provides for noncompetitive conversion to a career or career-conditional appointment;

(D) a career or limited term Senior Executive Service appointment;

(E) an appointment made under section 20113(b)(1) of title 51;

(F) an appointment to a position established under section 3104; or

(G) an appointment to a position established under section 5108; or

(2) a student trainee who, upon completion of academic work, is converted to an appointment in the Administration that is identified in paragraph (1) in accordance with an appropriate authority.

(b) The Administrator may pay the travel, transportation, and relocation expenses of a new appointee to the same extent, in the same manner, and subject to the same conditions as the payment of such expenses under sections 5724, 5724a, 5724b, and 5724c to an employee transferred in the interests of the United States Government.

(Added Pub. L. 108–201, §3(a), Feb. 24, 2004, 118 Stat. 472; amended Pub. L. 111–314, §4(a), Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3440.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (a)(1)(E). Pub. L. 111–314 substituted "section 20113(b)(1) of title 51" for "section 203(c)(2)(A) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(2)(A))".
1 The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-1607

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Jeremy Michael Whitcher, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 5, 2011 Filed: July 8, 2011

___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Pursuant to a plea agreement containi ng an appeal waiver, Jeremy Whitcher pleaded guilty to making a false claim against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287. The district court 1 sentenced him to a 12-month prison term to run consecutively to his undischarged state senten ces. Whitcher appeals. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), questioning whether the court abused its discretion in imposing a consecutive sentence.-2- We will enforce the appeal waiver. This appeal falls within the scope of the waiver; Whitcher’s testimony at the plea hearing shows that he entered into both the plea agreement and the waiver knowingly and voluntarily; and we conclude that enforcing the waiver will not result ina miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Having reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues not covered by the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and we dismiss the appeal.

______________________________