alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SUBCHAPTER III—ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–454, title II, §204(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1137, substituted "ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES" for "HEARING EXAMINERS" in subchapter heading.
§ 147.4 Guideline B—Foreign influence. ( a ) *The concern.* A security risk may exist when an individual's immediate family, including cohabitants and other persons to whom he or she may be bound by affection, influence, or obligation are not citizens of the United States or may be subject to duress. These situations could create the potential for foreign influence that could result in the compromise of classified information. Contacts with citizens of other countries or financial interests in other countries are also relevant to security determinations if they make an individual potentially vulnerable to coercion, exploitation, or pressure.
( b ) *Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:* ( 1 ) An immediate family member, or a person to whom the individual has close ties of affection or obligation, is a citizen of, or resident or present in, a foreign country;
( 2 ) Sharing living quarters with a person or persons, regardless of their citizenship status, if the potential for adverse foreign influence or duress exists;
( 3 ) Relatives, cohabitants, or associates who are connected with any foreign government;
( 4 ) Failing to report, where required, associations with foreign nationals;
( 5 ) Unauthorized association with a suspected or known collaborator or employee of a foreign intelligence service;
( 6 ) Conduct which may make the individual vulnerable to coercion, exploitation, or pressure by a foreign government;
( 7 ) Indications that representatives or nationals from a foreign country are acting to increase the vulnerability of the individual to possible future exploitation, coercion or pressure;
( 8 ) A substantial financial interest in a country, or in any foreign owned or operated business that could make the individual vulnerable to foreign influence.
( c ) *Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:* ( 1 ) A determination that the immediate family member(s) (spouse, father, mother, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters), cohabitant, or associate(s) in question are not agents of a foreign power or in a position to be exploited by a foreign power in a way that could force the individual to choose between loyalty to the person(s) involved and the United States;
( 2 ) Contacts with foreign citizens are the result of official United States Government business;
( 3 ) Contact and correspondence with foreign citizens are casual and infrequent;
( 4 ) The individual has promptly complied with existing agency requirements regarding the reporting of contacts, requests, or threats from persons or organizations from a foreign country;
( 5 ) Foreign financial interests are minimal and not sufficient to affect the individual's security responsibilities.
§ 1605.12 State Director of Selective Service. ( a ) The State Director of Selective Service for each State, subject to the direction and control of the Director of Selective Service, shall be in immediate charge of the State Headquarters for Selective Service in his State. The State Headquarters for Selective Service shall be an office of record for Selective Service operations only, and no records other than Selective Service records shall be maintained in such office.
( b ) The State Director of Selective Service will perform such duties as are prescribed by the Director of Selective Service.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,453
<SECURITIES>                                     4,509
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,006
<INVENTORY>                                      9,216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,108
<PP&E>                                          12,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,335
<BONDS>                                          4,828
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,840
<SALES>                                         38,294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,294
<CGS>                                           28,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,130)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,223)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      88
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,068)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.80)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of this Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-44337) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CTC
Communications Corp. and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-17613)
pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan of CTC Communications Corp. of our
report dated May 28, 1998, except for Note 1, as to which the date is July 15,
1998, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of CTC
Communications Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended March 31, 1998.


                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
July 15, 1998
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                        OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10 - KSB
                              OF SIONIX CORPORATION
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

         The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of Sionix Corporation
(the "Company"). This certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification accompanies the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report").

         I, Robert E. McCray, certify that:

         (i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

This certification is executed as of June 8, 2007

                                       /s/ Robert E. McCray
                                       --------------------
                                       Robert E. McCray, Chief Financial Officer
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2933

___________ Ken Matthews; Nan Matthews, * * Appellants, * * v. * * Fred Porter, Individually and in his * capacity as Administrator, Motor * Vehicle Division, a Section of the * Arkansas Department of Finance & * Administration; Roger Duren, Manager, * Office of Motor Vehicles, Direct * Appeal from the United States Services, individually in his own right * District Court for the and in his capacity as State Official; * Eastern District of Arkansas. Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, * Michigan; Brian J. Roberts, Warranty * [UNPUBLISHED] Administration Office, Ford Motor * Company, Detroit, Michigan, * individually and as a FMC employee; * DOES, Other Arkansas Revenue * Department, Ford staff names unknown * at this time, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 7, 1998 Filed: December 18, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- ___________ PER CURIAM. Ken and Nan Matthews appeal from the district court & s dismissal of thei r 1 complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties & submissions, we conclude that the district court was correct. Se e Double D Spotting Serv., Inc. v. Supervalu, Inc. , 136 F.3d 554, 557 (8th Cir. 1998) (de novostandard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL MAYS, an Individual, and KALA HENNESSEY, an Individual

, Appellant s ,

v.

JOE TAYLOR RESTORATION, INC., a Florida Corporation, JOSEPH TAYLOR, an Individual, AARON GETTY, an Individual, CLEGG DURKIN, an Individual, and JOHN DOE(S), an Unknown Person(s) and/or Corporation(s)

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 21

- 1776

[ June 30, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; James Nu tt , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2020

- CA

- 006839

- XXXX

- MB

.

Jay Lewis Farrow and Meera K. Koodie of Farrow Law Firm, P.A., Davie, for appellant s

.

Joshua S. Widlansky and Stephen J. Padula of Padula Bennardo Levine, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee s Joe Taylor Resto ration, Inc. and Joseph Taylor

.

Ronald P. Ponzoli, Jr. and Leslie Arsenault Metz of Gray Robinson, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee Aaron Getty.

Ronald M. Gache and Scott A. Simon of Logs Legal Group LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee Clegg Durkin.

P ER C U RIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH
, C.J., C IKLIN and C ONNER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 941.824 Special performance standards—mountaintop removal.

Part 824 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Mountaintop Removal,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining operations constituting mountaintop removal mining.
### §414. Special provisions concerning the Corporation for National and Community Service

(a) Personnel.—Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (7) and (8) of section 406(a) of this title, it is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service to—

(1) appoint and determine the compensation of such officers and employees in accordance with section 195(b) of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12651f(b)); and

(2) procure the temporary and intermittent services of and compensate such experts and consultants, in accordance with section 3109(b) of this title,

as may be necessary to carry out the functions, powers, and duties of the Inspector General.

(b) Reports to Board of Directors.—Not later than the date on which the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation for National and Community Service transmits any report to the Congress under subsection (b) or (c) of section 405 of this title, the Chief Executive Officer shall transmit such report to the Board of Directors of such Corporation.

(c) Review of Audit Reports by Board of Directors.—Not later than the date on which the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation for National and Community Service transmits a report described under section 405(c) of this title to the Board of Directors as provided under subsection (b) of this section, the Chief Executive Officer shall also transmit any audit report which is described in the statement required under section 405(c)(4) to the Board of Directors. All such audit reports shall be placed on the agenda for review at the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors following such transmittal. The Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation shall be present at such meeting to provide any information relating to such audit reports.

(d) Report of Problem, Abuse, or Deficiency to Board of Directors.—Not later than the date on which the Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service reports a problem, abuse, or deficiency under section 405(e) of this title to the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, the Chief Executive Officer shall report such problem, abuse, or deficiency to the Board of Directors.

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(b), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4235.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 414 | 5 U.S.C. App. (IGA §8F) | Pub. L. 95–452, §8F, formerly §8E, as added Pub. L. 103–82, title II, §202(g)(1), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 889; renumbered §8F, Pub. L. 103–204, §23(a)(3), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2408; amended Pub. L. 111–13, title IV, §4101, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1597. |

Section
# C_2008116EN.01000202.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles (Belgium)) — Criminal proceedings against Ioannis Doulamis

(Case C-446/05) (1)

1

(Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 10 EC - National legislation prohibiting advertising of dental care services)

(2008/C 116/03)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles

Party in the main criminal proceedings

Ioannis Doulamis

Intervening parties: Union des Dentistes et Stomatologistes de Belgique (UPR), Jean Totolidis

Intervening parties

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles — Interpretation of Article 81 EC, the second paragraph of Article 10 EC and Article 3(1)(g) EC — National legislation prohibiting all advertising in the dental care sector

Operative part of the judgment

Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 3(1)(g) EC and the second paragraph of Article 10 EC, does not preclude a national law, such as the Law of 15 April 1958, which prohibits any person or dental care providers, in the context of professional services or a dental surgery, from engaging in advertising of any kind in the dental care sector.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.

1

---
#### HUTCHINSON, Respondent, v. ELDER. Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 27, 1903.)

Action by Orville Hutchinson against William H Elder.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with costs. McLENNAN, J., not voting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
            
<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS                         
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                                    123,000
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           1,154,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                             1,027,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        2,455,800
<PP&E>                                                  2,736,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                          1,619,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          5,114,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,696,300
<BONDS>                                                   758,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                   46,200
<OTHER-SE>                                              1,732,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            5,114,800
<SALES>                                                 3,693,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        3,743,800
<CGS>                                                   2,908,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           3,439,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         36,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           240,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                               86,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       155,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                              155,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 .88
                                                                 

</TABLE>
#### § 1908.36 Notification of decision and right of further appeal.

The Executive Secretary of the Agency Release Panel shall promptly prepare and communicate the final Agency decision to the requester, NARA, or the particular Presidential Library. That correspondence shall include a notice, if applicable, that an appeal of the decision may be made to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP) established pursuant to section 5.3 of the Order.

[76 FR 59034, Sept. 23, 2011]
#### § 174.10 [Reserved]
### §2744. Limits on construction projects

#### (a) Construction cost ceiling

Except as provided in subsection (b), construction on a construction project which is in support of national security programs of the Department of Energy and was authorized by a DOE national security authorization may not be started, and additional obligations in connection with the project above the total estimated cost may not be incurred, whenever the current estimated cost of the construction project exceeds by more than 25 percent the higher of—

(1) the amount authorized for the project; or

(2) the amount of the total estimated cost for the project as shown in the most recent budget justification data submitted to Congress.

#### (b) Exception where notice-and-wait given

An action described in subsection (a) may be taken if—

(1) the Secretary of Energy has submitted to the congressional defense committees a report on the actions and the circumstances making such action necessary; and

(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed after the date on which the report is received by the committees.

#### (c) Computation of days

In the computation of the 30-day period under subsection (b), there shall be excluded any day on which either House of Congress is not in session because of an adjournment of more than three days to a day certain.

#### (d) Exception for minor projects

Subsection (a) does not apply to a construction project with a current estimated cost of less than the minor construction threshold.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLVII, §4704, formerly div. C, title XXXVI, §3623, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2758; renumbered div. D, title XLVII, §4704, by Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(j)(2)(A)–(C), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1781.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 7386c of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 108–136.
#### § 842.1 Scope.

This part sets forth general procedures governing Federal inspections under the permanent regulatory program.
### §304102. Duties of Council

(a) Duties.—The Council shall—

(1) advise the President and Congress on matters relating to historic preservation, recommend measures to coordinate activities of Federal, State, and local agencies and private institutions and individuals relating to historic preservation, and advise on the dissemination of information pertaining to those activities;

(2) encourage, in cooperation with the National Trust and appropriate private agencies, public interest and participation in historic preservation;

(3) recommend the conduct of studies in such areas as—

(A) the adequacy of legislative and administrative statutes and regulations pertaining to historic preservation activities of State and local governments; and

(B) the effects of tax policies at all levels of government on historic preservation;

(4) advise as to guidelines for the assistance of State and local governments in drafting legislation relating to historic preservation;

(5) encourage, in cooperation with appropriate public and private agencies and institutions, training and education in the field of historic preservation;

(6) review the policies and programs of Federal agencies and recommend to Federal agencies methods to improve the effectiveness, coordination, and consistency of those policies and programs with the policies and programs carried out under this division; and

(7) inform and educate Federal agencies, State and local governments, Indian tribes, other nations and international organizations and private groups and individuals as to the Council's authorized activities.

(b) Annual Report.—The Council annually shall submit to the President a comprehensive report of its activities and the results of its studies and shall from time to time submit additional and special reports as it deems advisable. Each report shall propose legislative enactments and other actions as, in the judgment of the Council, are necessary and appropriate to carry out its recommendations and shall provide the Council's assessment of current and emerging problems in the field of historic preservation and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the programs of Federal agencies, State and local governments, and the private sector in carrying out this division.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3210.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 304102 | 16 U.S.C. 470j. | Pub. L. 89–665, title II, §202, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 918; Pub. L. 96–515, title III, §301(g), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2999. |

Section
#### § 921.764 Process for designating areas unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.

Part 764 of this chapter, *State Processes for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* pertaining to petitioning, initial processing, hearing requirements, decisions, data base and inventory systems, public information, and regulatory responsibilities, are applicable in Massachusetts beginning on May 28 1983.