alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2001.32 Declassification guides. ( a ) *Preparation of declassification guides.* Beginning one year after the effective date of this directive, declassification guides must be submitted to the Director of ISOO, serving as the Executive Secretary of the Panel, at least one year prior to the onset of automatic declassification for approval by the Panel. Currently approved guides remain in effect until a new guide is approved, to the extent they are otherwise applied consistent with section 3.3(b) of the Order. The information to be exempted must be narrowly defined, with sufficient specificity to allow the user to identify the information with precision. Exemptions must be based upon specific content and not type of document. Exemptions for general categories of information are not acceptable. Agencies must prepare guides that clearly delineate between the exemptions proposed under sections 3.3(b), 3.3(h)(1) and (2), and 3.3(h)(3).
( b ) *General content of declassification guides.* Declassification guides must be specific and detailed as to the information requiring continued classification and clearly and demonstrably explain the reasons for continued classification. Declassification guides shall: ( 1 ) Be submitted by the agency head or the designated senior agency official;
( 2 ) Provide the date of issuance or last review;
( 3 ) State precisely the information that the agency proposes to exempt from automatic declassification and to specifically declassify;
( 4 ) Identify any related files series that have been exempted from automatic declassification pursuant to section 3.3(c) of the Order; and
( 5 ) To the extent a guide is used in conjunction with the automatic declassification provisions in section 3.3 of the Order, state precisely the elements of information to be exempted from declassification to include: ( i ) The appropriate exemption category listed in section 3.3(b), and, if appropriate, section 3.3(h) of the Order; and
( ii ) A date or event for declassification that is in accordance with section 3.3(b) or section 3.3(h).
( c ) *Internal review and update.* Agency declassification guides shall be reviewed and updated as circumstances require, but at least once every five years. Each agency shall maintain a list of its declassification guides in use.
( d ) *Dissemination of guides.* ( 1 ) Declassification guides shall be disseminated within the agency to be used by all personnel with declassification review responsibilities.
( 2 ) Declassification guides or detailed declassification guidance shall be submitted to the Director of the NDC in accordance with section 3.7(b)(3) of the Order.
#### Betty L. Krzos, Appellant, v. Edward R. Krzos, Respondent.

Appeal unanimously dismissed as academic, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order modifying a provision in a prior interlocutory order fixing alimony *pendente lite*and granting defendant husband limited rights to visit the children of the marriage. On the day the appeal was argued by appellant the trial court handed down a decision following trial of the separation action. Provisions therein are made for custody of the children and visitation rights of the respondent. Thereby the order appealed from became moot. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term modifying an order pertaining to visitation.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 101 

Expressing deepest condolences for the lives lost, and unwavering solidarity 

with the Republic of Tu ̈rkiye and the Turkish people following the 

destructive earthquakes that devastated the Turkish cities of Malatya, 

Kahramanmaras ̧, Adana, Ad(yaman, Diyarbak(r, Osmaniye, Gaziantep, 

S ̧anl(urfa, Hatay, and Kilis. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2023 

Mr. SESSIONS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing deepest condolences for the lives lost, and unwavering solidarity with the Republic of Tu ̈rkiye and the 

Turkish people following the destructive earthquakes that 

devastated the Turkish cities of Malatya, 

Kahramanmaras ̧, Adana, Ad(yaman, Diyarbak(r, 

Osmaniye, Gaziantep, S ̧anl(urfa, Hatay, and Kilis. 

Whereas, on February 6, 2023, the Turkish cities of Malatya, 

Kahramanmaras ̧, Adana, Ad(yaman, Diyarbak(r, 

Osmaniye, Gaziantep, S ̧anl(urfa, Hatay, and Kilis, were 

devastated by 2 massive 7.7 and 7.6 magnitude earthquakes; 

Whereas many aftershocks, some as potent as 6.6 magnitude, 

have been recorded since the initial earthquake; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 101 IH 

Whereas the number of people who have lost their lives has 

already exceeded 5,400 and increasing; 

Whereas the number of people who have been injured has already exceeded 35,000 and increasing; 

Whereas the brave men and women of North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization ally Tu ̈rkiye have passionately and painstakingly been participating in the rescue efforts for days; 

and 

Whereas the Republic of Tu ̈rkiye has declared a state of 

emergency in the region for 3 months, and a national 

mourning for 7 days: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses deepest condolences to the fami3 lies who have lost loved ones, and wishes a speedy 

4 recovery for the injured; 

5 (2) encourages and commends the hard work 

6 put out by the brave men and women of North At7 lantic Treaty Organization ally Tu ̈rkiye while con8 ducting search and rescue missions in the cities im9 pacted by the earthquakes; 

10 (3) conveys its committed and unwavering soli11 darity with the Republic of Tu ̈rkiye and the Turkish 

12 people following the devastating disasters; and 

13 (4) urges the Biden Administration to provide 

14 immediate assistance to the people of Tu ̈rkiye. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE> 1
                                                             EXHIBIT 99.1


              Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                               Section  906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002



        I, Leonard A. Rosenbaum, President, Chief Executive Officer and
        Director of CVD Equipment Corporation certify that:

        1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CVD
             Equipment Corporation (the "Registrant");

        2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
             any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
             material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
             light of the circumstances under which such statements were
             made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
             this annual report; and

        3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
             financial information included in this annual report,
             fairly present in all material respects the financial
             condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
             registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
             annual report.




        Dated: March 28, 2003

           /s/ Leonard A. Rosenbaum
        ----------------------------------------
        President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


<PAGE> 2
                                                             EXHIBIT 99.2


              Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                               Section  906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002



        I, Sharon Canese, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of CVD
        Equipment Corporation certify that:

        1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CVD
             Equipment Corporation (the "Registrant");

        2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
             any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
             material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
             light of the circumstances under which such statements were
             made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
             this annual report; and

        3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
             financial information included in this annual report,
             fairly present in all material respects the financial
             condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
             registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
             annual report.




        Dated: March 28, 2003

           /s/ Sharon Canese
        ----------------------------------------
         Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
§ 2001.52 Emergency authority. ( a ) Agency heads or any designee may prescribe special provisions for the dissemination, transmission, safeguarding, and destruction of classified information during certain emergency situations.
( b ) In emergency situations, in which there is an imminent threat to life or in defense of the homeland, agency heads or designees may authorize the disclosure of classified information to an individual or individuals who are otherwise not routinely eligible for access under the following conditions: ( 1 ) Limit the amount of classified information disclosed to the absolute minimum to achieve the purpose;
( 2 ) Limit the number of individuals who receive it;
( 3 ) Transmit the classified information via approved Federal Government channels by the most secure and expeditious method to include those required in § 2001.46, or other means deemed necessary when time is of the essence;
( 4 ) Provide instructions about what specific information is classified and how it should be safeguarded; physical custody of classified information must remain with an authorized Federal Government entity, in all but the most extraordinary circumstances;
( 5 ) Provide appropriate briefings to the recipients on their responsibilities not to disclose the information and obtain a signed nondisclosure agreement;
( 6 ) Within 72 hours of the disclosure of classified information, or the earliest opportunity that the emergency permits, but no later than 30 days after the release, the disclosing authority must notify the originating agency of the information by providing the following information: ( i ) A description of the disclosed information;
( ii ) To whom the information was disclosed;
( iii ) How the information was disclosed and transmitted;
( iv ) Reason for the emergency release;
( v ) How the information is being safeguarded; and
( vi ) A description of the briefings provided and a copy of the nondisclosure agreements signed.
( 7 ) Information disclosed in emergency situations shall not be required to be declassified as a result of such disclosure or subsequent use by a recipient.
#### § 1630.15 Class 1-H: Registrant not subject to processing for induction.

In Class 1-H shall be placed any registrant who is not eligible for Class 1-A and is not currently subject to processing for induction.
#### Max Storch, Appellant, v. Josephine Romano, Respondent. (Eight Other Proceedings.)

Motion by appellant for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, without costs. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ex Parte Nii

- Otabil Nelson

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 152

- C R

Trial court case number: 137 2 073

- B

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

This Court’s Ma y 2 5 , 2017 Order had directed appellant’s counsel, Alphonsus O.

Ezeoke , to file a motion for rehearing addressing this Court’s March 28, 2017 Memo

Opinion dismissing this appeal for want of jurisdiction, along with a second motion for

an extension of time, within ten days of that Order or else appellant’s “Opening Brief”

wou ld be stricken as non

- compliant

. See T EX

. R

. A P P

. P. 38.9(a); cf. id. 42.3 ( c).

Appellant has failed to timely respond.

Accordingly, the Court sua sponte STRIKES appellant’s “Opening Brief” because

he failed to timely comply with this Court’s Order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 38.9(a) , 42.3(c)

. The Clerk of this Court is directed to mark appellant ’s brief, received on May 19, 2017,

as stricken.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually

Date: June 1 3 , 2017
#### American Trust Company v. Barnett Glassman. (Two Actions.)

Motion to dismiss appeals granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before January 3, 1961, with notice of argument for the February 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Motion for consolidation granted insofar as to allow appellant to have the appeals heard in one appeal book, without duplication of printing, upon condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before January 3, 1961, with notice of argument for the February 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
**Exhibit 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF HICKORY TECH CORPORATION**

 
| **Subsidiaries**                                    | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of  Incorporation** |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|
|                                                |       |                               |
| Mankato Citizens Telephone Company                  |       | Minnesota                          |
| Mid-Communications, Inc.                            |       | Minnesota                          |
| Cable Network, Inc.                                 |       | Minnesota                          |
| Heartland Telecommunications Company of  Iowa, Inc. |       | Minnesota                          |
| Crystal Communications, Inc.                        |       | Minnesota                          |
| National Independent Billing, Inc.                  |       | Minnesota                          |
| Collins Communications Systems Co.                  |       | Minnesota                          |

 

All such subsidiaries are 100% owned by Hickory Tech Corporation. Thefinancial statements of all such subsidiaries are included in the ConsolidatedFinancial Statements of Hickory Tech Corporation. Hickory Tech Corporation isincorporated in Minnesota.

 

----
# C_2008223EN.01000302.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 July 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-389/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Articles 43 and 49 EC - Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services - Animal health - Artificial insemination centre for bovine animals - National rules conferring on authorised centres the exclusive right to provide the service of artificially inseminating bovine animals in a defined geographical area and making the issue of an inseminator's licence subject to the conclusion of an agreement with one of those centres)

(2008/C 223/04)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Bordes and E. Traversa, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, A. Colomb and G. Le Bras, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 43 and 49 EC — Only ‘insemination centres’ authorised in France allowed to carry out activities relating to the artificial insemination of bovine animals.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by allowing only authorised artificial insemination centres, with exclusive rights over determined geographical areas, and persons holding an inseminator's licence, the issue of which is subject to the conclusion of an agreement with one of those centres, to provide the service of artificial insemination of bovine animals, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 EC and 49 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by allowing only authorised artificial insemination centres, with exclusive rights over determined geographical areas, and persons holding an inseminator's licence, the issue of which is subject to the conclusion of an agreement with one of those centres, to provide the service of artificial insemination of bovine animals, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 EC and 49 EC;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 14.1.2006.

1

---
#### WULFF, Respondent, v. FIFTH AVE. COACH CO., Appellant (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 27, 1905.)

Actions by Robert Wulff an infant, by his guardian ad litem, and by Adolph Wulff, against the Fifth Avenue Coach Company. No opinion. Judgment and order in each case unanimously affirmed, with costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 783

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 54956, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 783 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 783.2 Objectives.

The objectives of this part are to ensure that each application provides to the regulatory authority a complete and accurate description of the environmental resources that may be impacted or affected by proposed underground mining activities.

[44 FR 15363, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54956, Nov. 17, 2017]
§ 21.330 How are the DoDGARs published and maintained? ( a ) The DoD publishes the DoDGARs in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
( b ) The location of the DoDGARs in the CFR currently is in transition. The regulations are moving from chapter I, subchapter C, title 32, to a new location in chapter XI, title 2 of the CFR. During the transition, there will be some parts of the DoDGARs in each of the two titles.
( c ) The DoD publishes updates to the DoDGARs in the Federal Register for public comment.
( d ) A standing working group recommends revisions to the DoDGARs to the ASD(R&E). The ASD(R&E), Director of Defense Procurement, and each Military Department must be represented on the working group. Other DoD Components that make or administer awards may also nominate representatives. The working group meets when necessary.
[85 FR 51240, Aug. 19, 2020]
### §3701. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) the term "agency" means an Executive agency, but does not include the Government Accountability Office; and

(2) the term "detail" means—

(A) the assignment or loan of an employee of an agency to a private sector organization without a change of position from the agency that employs the individual, or

(B) the assignment or loan of an employee of a private sector organization to an agency without a change of position from the private sector organization that employs the individual,

whichever is appropriate in the context in which such term is used.

(Added Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §209(c)(1), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2925; amended Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Par. (1). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days after Dec. 17, 2002, see section 402(a) of Pub. L. 107–347, set out as a note under section 3601 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
§ 1801.63 Specific exemptions. Pursuant to authority granted in section (k) of the Privacy Act, the Director, NACIC has determined to exempt from section (d) of the Privacy Act those portions and only those portions of all systems of records maintained by NACIC that would consist of, pertain to, or otherwise reveal information that is: ( a ) Classified pursuant to Executive Order 12958 (or successor or prior Order) and thus subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1) and 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1);
( b ) Investigatory in nature and compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the scope of section (j)(2) of the Act; provided however, that if an individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit to which they are otherwise eligible, as a result of the maintenance of such material, then such material shall be provided to that individual except to the extent that the disclosure would reveal the identity of a source who furnished the information to the United States Government under an express promise of confidentiality, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise of confidentiality;
( c ) Maintained in connection with providing protective services to the President of the United States or other individuals pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3056;
( d ) Required by statute to be maintained and used solely as statistical records;
( e ) Investigatory in nature and compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for federal civilian employment, military service, federal contracts, or access to classified information, but only to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the United States Government under an express promise of confidentiality, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise of confidentiality;
( f ) Testing or examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the federal service the disclosure of which would compromise the objectivity or fairness of the testing or examination process; or
( g ) Evaluation material used to determine potential for promotion in the armed services, but only to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the United States Government under an express promise of confidentiality, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise of confidentiality.