alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §304106. International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property

(a) Authorization of Participation.—The participation of the United States as a member in the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property is authorized.

(b) Official Delegation.—The Council shall recommend to the Secretary of State, after consultation with the Smithsonian Institution and other public and private organizations concerned with the technical problems of preservation, the members of the official delegation that will participate in the activities of the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property on behalf of the United States. The Secretary of State shall appoint the members of the official delegation from the persons recommended to the Secretary of State by the Council.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3213.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 304106 | 16 U.S.C. 470n. | Pub. L. 89–665, title II, §206, as added Pub. L. 91–243, §2, May 9, 1970, 84 Stat. 204; Pub. L. 93–54, §1(b), July 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 139; Pub. L. 94–422, title II, §201(8), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1322; Pub. L. 96–199, title I, §114, Mar. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 71; Pub. L. 106–208, §5(b), May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 319. |

Section

The text of 16 U.S.C. 470n(c) is omitted as obsolete.
[LETTERHEAD OF RECONTA ERNST & YOUNG]


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form F-3 of Fila Holding S.p.A. of our report dated April 2, 2002, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Fila Holdings S.p.A. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2001, which report is included in the Annual
Report (Form 20-F) of Fila Holding S.p.A. for the year ended December 31, 2001.
We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
registration statement of Form F-3.


/s/ RECONTA ERNST & YOUNG
-------------------------
Milan, Italy
January 30, 2003
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Capstead MortgageCorporation of our report dated February 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Capstead Mortgage Corporation, included in the 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders ofCapstead Mortgage Corporation.We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements and therelated prospectuses: **•** Form S-3 (No. 33-62212);  **•** Form S-8 (No. 33-53555);  **•** Form S-3 (No. 333-03187);  **•** Form S-8 (No. 333-12719);  **•** Form S-3 (No. 333-26419) and Amendment No.1 thereto;  **•** Form S-8 (No. 333-27215);  **•** Form S-3 (No. 333-43169) and Amendment No.1 thereto;  **•** Form S-3 (No. 333-63358);  **•** Form S-3 (No. 333-68424) and Amendment No.1 thereto;  **•** Form S-3 (No. 333-112900);  **•** Form S-3 (No. 333-116741);  **•** Form S-3 (No. 333-119193); and  **•** Form S-8 (No. 333-116738);of our report dated February 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofCapstead Mortgage Corporation incorporated herein by reference and our report dated February 28,2007, with respect to Capstead Mortgage Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Capstead Mortgage Corporation, incorporated herein by reference.         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP  Dallas, Texas
### §§751 to 755. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–861, §36A, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1570

Section 751, act July 24, 1956, ch. 689, §1, 70 Stat. 630, related to representation of members of the Armed Forces before foreign judicial tribunals and employment of counsel.

Section 752, act July 24, 1956, ch. 689, §2, 70 Stat. 630, provided for enactment of regulations.

Section 753, act July 24, 1956, ch. 689, §3, 70 Stat. 630, provided that sections 189 and 365 of the Revised Statutes not apply to action taken under this act.

Section 754, act July 24, 1956, ch. 689, §4, 70 Stat. 630, related to claims for reimbursement.

Section 755, act July 24, 1956, ch. 689, §5, 70 Stat. 630, related to appropriations.
### §3371b. Information sharing with State election officials

#### (a) State defined

In this section, the term "State" means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States.

#### (b) Security clearances

#### (1) In general

Not later than 30 days after December 20, 2019, the Director of National Intelligence shall support the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Intelligence and Analysis, and any other official of the Department of Homeland Security designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security, in sponsoring a security clearance up to the top secret level for each eligible chief election official of a State or the District of Columbia, and additional eligible designees of such election official as appropriate, at the time that such election official assumes such position.

#### (2) Interim clearances

Consistent with applicable policies and directives, the Director of National Intelligence may issue interim clearances, for a period to be determined by the Director, to a chief election official as described in paragraph (1) and up to one designee of such official under such paragraph.

#### (c) Information sharing

#### (1) In general

The Director of National Intelligence shall assist the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Intelligence and Analysis and the Under Secretary responsible for overseeing critical infrastructure protection, cybersecurity, and other related programs of the Department (as specified in section 113(a)(1)(H) of title 6) with sharing any appropriate classified information related to threats to election systems and to the integrity of the election process with chief election officials and such designees who have received a security clearance under subsection (b).

#### (2) Coordination

The Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Intelligence and Analysis shall coordinate with the Director of National Intelligence and the Under Secretary responsible for overseeing critical infrastructure protection, cybersecurity, and other related programs of the Department (as specified in section 113(a)(1)(H) of title 6) to facilitate the sharing of information to the affected Secretaries of State or States.

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXV, §6506, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2206.)
600

600

H E M L O C K D R

L A K E V IE W R D

S H E L L S W IC K R D

M IC H IG A N R D

H E M L O C K D R

L A K E V IE W R D

S H E L L S W IC K R D

M IC H IG A N R D

Big Marsh

L A K E M I C H I G A N

Hog

Island

South

Point

Fisherman

Shoal

Washington

Island SE

Washington

Island NW

Spider

Island

Fairport

OE S

Washington

Island SW

Washington

Island NE

14

13

12

16

15

23

19

11

18

21

17

22

15

16

N

18

14

17

11 14

11

12

24

15

24

13

17

23

16

N

18

21

19

11 12 14 15 16

10 19

10 E 17 18

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50 000m

50

50

50

50

5 5

50

50

5

50

50

50

50

50

000m

5

50

5 5

5 5 5

5 5

000m 5 5

000m

5 5 5

2 780 000 FEET E

800 FEET

540

2 000

570 000

FEET

000

FEET

30" 17'

20' 20'

17' 30"

47'

50' 47'

50'

30"

86° 30"

86°

52'30"

30"

45°

52'

45'

30" 30"

86°

22' 45°22'

45°15' 45°15'

86°45'

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

WASHINGTON ISLAND SE, WI

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WASHINGTON ISLAND SE QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 16T

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, July 2008

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1998

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 8 ́

2 MILS

4° 57 ́

88 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

16T

ER

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
### §§2624 to 2626. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. C, title XXXI, §3132(a)(1)(B)(ii), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3060

Section 2624, Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIV, §4444, formerly Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXI, §3131], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–454; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIV, §4444, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(g)(19), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1768; Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(e)(14), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1078, related to funding for termination costs of the River Protection Project, Richland, Washington.

Section 2625, Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIV, §4445, as added Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3127(a), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1064, related to the plan for tank farm waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Richland, Washington.

Section 2626, Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIV, §4446, as added Pub. L. 114–92, div. C, title XXXI, §3116(a), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1194; Pub. L. 115–232, div. C, title XXXI, §3137(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2303, related to contract oversight for the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50189 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE MARIA REIS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-1576-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Maria Reis appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Reis contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Reis maintains that he pleaded guilty to anNo. 03-50189 -2- indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Reis acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
No. 8073.

#### Jackman et al. *v.*Jackman.

(Decided October 27, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Foran & McTighe; Mr. J. J. McCormick*and *Messrs. Brinsmade & Armstrong,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Dawley & Aleáis*and *Messrs. James M. é Walter F. Brown,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Davis and Price, JJ., concur.

Spear, Shauck and Crew, JJ., dissent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4559-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-4559-DR), dated August 28, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued September 14, 2020.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 28, 2020.

Bossier, Evangeline, and Webster Parishes for debris removal [Category A] (already designated for emergency protective measures [Category B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

                        The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance                               ( print page 85654)                            (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.                    

Pete Gaynor,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2020-28725 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1027 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 626) to advance commonsense 

policy priorities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2024 

Mr. FITZPATRICK submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 626) to advance 

commonsense policy priorities. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution, the House shall proceed to the consideration in 

3 the House of the bill (H.R. 626) to advance commonsense 

4 policy priorities. All points of order against consideration 

5 of the bill are waived. The amendment in the nature of 

6 a substitute specified in section 3 of this resolution shall 

7 be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 

8 considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

9 in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 

10 shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1027 IH 

1 and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage 

2 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

3 equally divided and controlled by Representative 

4 Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania or a designee and an oppo5 nent; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

6 SEC. 2. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to 

7 the consideration of H.R. 626. 

8 SEC. 3. The amendment in the nature of a substitute 

9 referred to in the first section of this resolution is an 

10 amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the 

11 text of H.R. 7372 as introduced, modified by an amend12 ment received for printing in the portion of the Congres13 sional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 

14 rule XVIII dated at least one day before the consideration 

15 of H.R. 626, if submitted by Representative Fitzpatrick 

16 of Pennsylvania. If more than one such amendment is sub17 mitted, then only the last amendment submitted shall be 

18 considered as the modification. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Peter R. Kann, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 of Dow Jones & Company, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 7, 2004 

 

/s/PETER R. KANN

Peter R. Kann

Chief Executive Officer
### §3309. Preference eligibles; examinations; additional points for

A preference eligible who receives a passing grade in an examination for entrance into the competitive service is entitled to additional points above his earned rating, as follows—

(1) a preference eligible under section 2108(3)(C)–(G) of this title—10 points; and

(2) a preference eligible under section 2108(3)(A)–(B) of this title—5 points.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 419; Pub. L. 90–83, §1(8), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 197; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title XI, §1102(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1922.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 852 (1st sentence). | June 27, 1944, ch. 287, §3 (less proviso), 58 Stat. 388. |
| | | Jan. 19, 1948, ch. 1, §2, 62 Stat. 3. |
| | | Dec. 27, 1950, ch. 1151, §2(a), 64 Stat. 1117. |
| | | July 14, 1952, ch. 728, §2, 66 Stat. 627. |
| | | Aug. 14, 1953, ch. 485, §1(a) "Sec. 3 (1st sentence)", 67 Stat. 581. |

Statutes at Large

The word "competitive" is added before "service" for clarity. Application of this section to the excepted service in the executive branch and to the government of the District of Columbia, as provided in former section 858, is carried into section 3320.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Par. (2). Pub. L. 105–85 substituted "section 2108(3)(A)–(B)" for "section 2108(3)(A)".

1967—Cl. (1). Pub. L. 90–83 substituted "section 2108(3)(C)–(G)" for "section 2108(3)(B)–(F)." See Historical and Revision Notes under section 3305 of this title.
To: File

From: Antonio Bouza Date: July 31, 2006 Subject: EPA Meeting of April 19, 2006

On April 19, 2006, the Department of Energy (DOE) had an informal meeting with representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). DOE is in the process of determining whether energy conservations standards are warranted for BC/EPS. The group representing DOE included Antonio Bouza and DOE Contractors, D&R International and Navigant Consulting. EPA was represented by Andrew Fanara and its consultants; ICF Consulting, the Cadmus Group and Ecos Consulting.

EPA provided the DOE with background information concerning EPA's efforts in development of the ENERGY STAR designation for battery chargers (BC) and external power supplies (EPS). In addition, DOE received a dataset for 190 Ac-Dc power adaptors and 22 Ac-Ac power adaptors. This dataset was summarized in chart form by the EPA including the test results for some battery chargers.