alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008272EN.01001601.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/16

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 — Evropaïki Dinamiki v Commission

(Case T-465/04) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Community tendering procedure - Provision of computer and related services linked to the information systems of the Directorate-General for Fisheries - Rejection of a submitted tender - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

(2008/C 272/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dinamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented: initially by K. Banks, and subsequently by M. Wilderspin and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 15 September 2004 not to accept the tender submitted by the applicant in the tendering procedure relating to the provision of computer and related services linked to the information systems of the Directorate-General for Fisheries, and to award the contract to the successful tenderer.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | The Commission's decision to reject the tender submitted by Evropaïki Dinamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and to award the contract to the successful tenderer in the tendering procedure ‘FISH/2004/02’ is annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Commission's decision to reject the tender submitted by Evropaïki Dinamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and to award the contract to the successful tenderer in the tendering procedure ‘FISH/2004/02’ is annulled.

| 2. | The Commission is ordered to pay all of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission is ordered to pay all of the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 57, 5.3.2005.

1

---
# C_2008128EN.01003102.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/31

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 April 2008 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-364/04) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Products processed from fruit and vegetables - Animal premiums - Period of 24 months)

(2008/C 128/67)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: I. Chalkias and E. Svolopoulou, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and L. Visaggio, initially, and M. Condou-Durande and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents, and N. Korogiannakis, lawyer, subsequently)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision 2004/561/EC of 16 July 2004 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2004 L 250, p. 21) inasmuch as it excludes certain expenditure by the Hellenic Republic in the sectors of products processed from fruit and vegetables and animal premiums.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 18.12.2004.

1

---
### Equivalent uranium and selected minor elements in magnetic concentrates from the Candle Quadrangle, Solomon Quadrangle, and elsewhere in Alaska

By: Kuo-Liang PanW.C. OverstreetKeith RobinsonA.E. HubertG. L. Crenshaw

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1135

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §570a. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 104–320, §11(d)(1), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3873.)
#### Willie Johnson, an Infant, v. Rose Mattus, Individually and Doing Business under the Name of Colony Ice Cream Co., et al.

Motion for resettlement denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente and Stevens, JJ.
### §20509. Designation of chief State election official

Each State shall designate a State officer or employee as the chief State election official to be responsible for coordination of State responsibilities under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 103–31, §10, May 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 87.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1973gg–8 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Marie McCall, Respondent, v. Wayne Liquor Corporation et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by the employer and carrier from an award of death benefits. Decedent was a 72-year-old liquor salesman. On January 19, 1960, decedent attended a testimonial dinner at a tavern known as Bay Ridge Manor given by the Brooklyn Tavern Owners’ Association for its retiring president. He left the dinner at about 1:30 A.M., and went to another tavern with several other liquor salesmen where he remained at a bar until about 5:00 a.m. He then left the bar, and a few minutes later was found by the operator of the bar, face up on the sidewalk about 15 feet from the tavern door. He never regained consciousness and died in a very short time due to a fractured skull. Upon autopsy it was found that his brain contained *“*three, plus, or large amounts ” of alcohol. The principal questions litigated before the board were whether he was in the course of employment and whether death was due solely to intoxication. The board has found in favor of the claimant on both questions. We do not need to pass upon these questions on the substantiality of the evidence to support the board’s findings thereon. We perceive no evidence whatever in this record that decedent suffered an industrial accident. The board did not expressly find that there was one. The only evidence is that the large, wide, concreted area where decedent fell was smooth, free from defects or obstructions and dry. There is no evidence that he struck anything either before or during the fall, or that anything struck him. All of the evidence is to the contrary. There was no other instrumentality involved. The only conclusion which can be drawn from the record is that decedent just fell without any cause outside himself in any way contributing. A straight fall with no evidence that it was due to anything connected with the employment does not constitute a compensable *759accident. Decision reversed and the claim dismissed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
### §409b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 409b, comprising section 302 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3072 of this title.
#### Bolton Hall et al., Respondents, *v.*The United States Reflector Company, Appellant.

(Argued February 28, 1882;

decided March 7, 1882.)

*Edward P. Wilder*for appellant.

*William B. Hornblower*for respondents.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Rapallo, J., absent.

Order affirmed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Ground-water flow analysis ofthe Mississippi Embayment aquifer system, South-Central United States**
 
Report
Plates:OneTwoThreeFourFiveSixSevenEightNine
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1416-I
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001055149
 
May 3, 2018
#### Edward List, Respondent, v. Pir-O-Wood Industries, Inc., Appellant.

Order, entered on October 30, 1963, granting summary judgment, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously reversed on the law, with costs to appellant, and the motion for summary judgment denied. At least two questions of fact presented issues which preclude the relief requested. These issues are whether the intent of the parties was that, failing consummation of the transaction, the broker’s compensation was to be limited to $1,000; and whether the defendant was bound to accept financing upon the conditions that were imposed by the proposed loan. Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Stener, JJ.
#### Daniel H. Overmyer et al., Appellants, v Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Respondent.

In an action, *inter alia,*to set aside a judgment obtained by the defendant against the plaintiffs in New York County, plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 11, 1978, which, *inter alia,*granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Order and judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. This appeal is totally devoid of merit and the issue sought to be litigated here has been previously determined adversely to the. appellants in other litigation in which they were involved. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
### §5506. Computation of extra pay based on standard or daylight saving time

When an employee as defined by section 2105 of this title or an individual employed by the government of the District of Columbia is entitled to extra pay for services performed between or after certain named hours of the day or night, the extra pay is computed on the basis of either standard or daylight saving time, depending on the time observed by law, custom, or practice where the services are performed.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 476.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 914. | Sept. 7, 1949, ch. 538, §2, 63 Stat. 690. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9930 

To amend the Small Business Act to include surviving children in the definition of small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled 

veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2024 

Mr. MOORE of Alabama (for himself, Ms. SEWELL, and Mr. ELLZEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small 

Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to include surviving children in the definition of small business concern owned 

and controlled by service-disabled veterans, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF SURVIVING CHILDREN IN 

4 SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN OWNED AND 

5 CONTROLLED BY SERVICE-DISABLED VET6 ERANS DEFINITION. 

7 Section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

8 632(q)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9930 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the 

2 following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(D)(i) During the time period described 

4 in clause (ii), a small business concern that was 

5 a small business concern described in subpara6 graph (A) or (B) immediately prior to the death 

7 of a service-disabled veteran who was the owner 

8 of the concern, the death of whom causes the 

9 concern to be less than 51 percent owned by 

10 one or more service-disabled veterans, if— 

11 ‘‘(I) a surviving child of the deceased 

12 veteran acquires such veteran’s ownership 

13 interest in such concern; and 

14 ‘‘(II) immediately prior to the death 

15 of such veteran and during the period de16 scribed in clause (ii), the small business 

17 concern is included in the database de18 scribed in section 36. 

19 ‘‘(ii) The time period described in this 

20 clause is the time period beginning on the date 

21 of the veteran’s death and ending on the earlier 

22 of— 

23 ‘‘(I) the date on which the surviving 

24 child relinquishes an ownership interest in 

25 the small business concern; or 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9930 IH

1 ‘‘(II) the date that is 3 years after the 

2 date of the veteran’s death.’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(8) SURVIVING CHILD.—The term ‘surviving 

6 child’ means a biological or legally adopted child of 

7 a service-disabled veteran.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          67,244                 528,975
<SECURITIES>                                 2,321,169               2,111,859
<RECEIVABLES>                                  855,972                 487,353
<ALLOWANCES>                                   167,793                  27,293
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                          78,195                  79,296
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,885                  34,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,112,902               3,145,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,052                  27,973
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,511                  50,511
<COMMON>                                       128,307                 128,307
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,897,582               2,938,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,112,902               3,145,573
<SALES>                                         45,982                  77,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,982                  77,707
<CGS>                                           30,643                  67,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,643                  67,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,339                  10,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,300                   2,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,039                   7,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,039                   7,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00                     .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00                     .00
        

</TABLE>
§ 1280.4 Responsibilities. ( a ) *DLA field activities.* ( 1 ) Heads of DLA Primary Level Field Activities are responsible for: ( i ) Designating a qualified individual under their command, preferably one experienced in the conduct of investigations, as the Claims Investigating Officer for the activity.
( ii ) Authorizing Heads of subordinate activities to appoint Claims Investigating Officers where necessary.
( 2 ) The Commander, DLA Administrative Support Center (DLASC) is responsible for designating a qualified individual, preferably one experienced in the conduct of investigations, as the Claims Investigating Officer for DLASC and HQ DLA.
( 3 ) Claims Investigating Officers are responsible for the expeditious conduct of all investigations and the processing of reports in accordance with appropriate Departmental regulations as prescribed by this part 1280. To ensure prompt investigation of every incident while witnesses are available, and before damage has been repaired, the duties of personnel as Claims Investigating Officers will ordinarily have priority over any other assignments they may have.
( 4 ) The Counsel, DLA Field Activities are responsible for: ( i ) Receiving claims reports and information about related litigation, and processing these reports and information in accordance with this part 1280 and appropriate Departmental regulations.
( ii ) Providing directions and guidance to Claims Investigating Officers in the investigation and processing of claims.
( b ) The Counsel, DLA (DLAH-G) is responsible for: ( 1 ) Providing guidance to Counsel at DLA field activities on all claims and litigation matters within the purview of this part 1280.
( 2 ) Receiving claims reports and information on related litigation forwarded to HQ DLA, Attention: DLAH-G, and processing these in accordance with this part 1280 and appropriate Departmental regulations.
( 3 ) Maintaining this part 1280 in a current status and reviewing it annually.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 245 (Monday, December 21, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83154-83159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28129]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (the SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or 
more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are 
blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in 
transactions with them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for applicable date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    OFAC: Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; 
Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-
622-2490; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Availability

    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and 
additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available 
on OFAC's website (www.treas.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On December 10, 2020, OFAC determined that the property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following 
persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed 
below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[[Page 83155]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21DE20.017


[[Page 83156]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21DE20.018


[[Page 83157]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21DE20.019


[[Page 83158]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21DE20.020


[[Page 83159]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21DE20.021

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C

    Dated: December 10, 2020.
Andrea Gacki,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2020-28129 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
## Subpart E—Attendance and Leave
Exhibit
23.1








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-144336) on Form S-1, pertaining to the 2007 public offering, of CVD
Equipment Corporation of our report dated March 31, 2010 relating to our audit
of the consolidated financial statements, which appear in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of CVD Equipment Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2009.











/s/
      MSPCCertified
      Public Accountants and Advisors,A
      Professional Corporation





Cranford,
New Jersey


March 31,
2010