alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8191. Determination of eligibility

The benefits of this subchapter are available as provided in this subchapter to eligible law enforcement officers (referred to in this subchapter as "eligible officers") and their survivors. For the purposes of this subchapter, an eligible officer is any person who is determined by the Secretary of Labor in his discretion to have been on any given occasion—

(1) a law enforcement officer and to have been engaged on that occasion in the apprehension or attempted apprehension of any person—

(A) for the commission of a crime against the United States, or

(B) who at that time was sought by a law enforcement authority of the United States for the commission of a crime against the United States, or

(C) who at that time was sought as a material witness in a criminal proceeding instituted by the United States; or

(2) a law enforcement officer and to have been engaged on that occasion in protecting or guarding a person held for the commission of a crime against the United States or as a material witness in connection with such a crime; or

(3) a law enforcement officer and to have been engaged on that occasion in the lawful prevention of, or lawful attempt to prevent, the commission of a crime against the United States;

and to have been on that occasion not an employee as defined in section 8101(1), and to have sustained on that occasion a personal injury for which the United States would be required under subchapter I of this chapter to pay compensation if he had been on that occasion such an employee engaged in the performance of his duty. No person otherwise eligible to receive a benefit under this subchapter because of the disability or death of an eligible officer shall be barred from the receipt of such benefit because the person apprehended or attempted to be apprehended by such officer was then sought for the commission of a crime against a sovereignty other than the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 90–291, §1(a), Apr. 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 98; amended Pub. L. 90–623, §1(20), Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1313.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–623 substituted "For the purposes of this subchapter" for "For the purposes of this Act".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–623 intended to restate without substantive change the law in effect on Oct. 22, 1968, see section 6 of Pub. L. 90–623, set out as a note under section 5334 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section 2 of Pub. L. 90–291 provided that: "The amendments made by section 1 of this Act [enacting this section and sections 8192 and 8193 of this title] are effective only with respect to personal injuries sustained on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 19, 1968]."
|   |  (1) |  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      |                                                                                                                                                       |
|   |  (2) |  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|  Date:  February 22, 2011       |  /s/ Kent M. Adams                               |
|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |  Kent M. Adams                                   |
|                                           |  President, Director and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                           |                                                  |
|                                           |                                                  |
|                                           |                                                  |
|  Date:  February 22, 2011  |  /s/ James A. Duensing                      |
|                                           |  James A. Duensing                               |
|                                           |  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial    |
|                                           |  Officer                                         |
§ 174.3 Definitions. ( a ) *Base closure law.* This term has the same meaning as provided in 10 U.S.C. § 101(a)(17)(B) and (C).
( b ) *Closure.* An action that ceases or relocates all current missions of an installation and eliminates or relocates all current personnel positions (military, civilian, and contractor), except for personnel required for caretaking, conducting any ongoing environmental cleanup, or property disposal. Retention of a small enclave, not associated with the main mission of the base, is still a closure.
( c ) *Consultation.* Explaining and discussing an issue, considering objections, modifications, and alternatives; but without a requirement to reach agreement.
( d ) *Date of approval.* This term has the same meaning as provided in section 2910(8) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-510.
( e ) *Excess property.* This term has the same meaning as provided in 40 U.S.C. § 102(3).
( f ) *Installation.* This term has the same meaning as provided in the definition for “military installation” in section 2910(4) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-510.
( g ) *Local Redevelopment Authority* (LRA). This term has the same meaning as provided in the definition for “redevelopment authority” in section 2910(9) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-510.
( h ) *Military Department.* This term has the same meaning as provided in 10 U.S.C. 101(a)(8).
( i ) *National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).* The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Pub. L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.,* as amended.
( j ) *Realignment.* This term has the same meaning as provided in section 2910(5) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-510.
( k ) *Secretary concerned.* This term has the same meaning as provided in 10 U.S.C. 101(a)(9)(A), (B), and (C).
( l ) *Surplus property.* This term has the same meaning as provided in 40 U.S.C. 102(10).
( m ) *Transition coordinator.* This term has the same meaning as used in section 2915 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994, Public Law 103-160.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                         
| |  | ------------------------
| |  | /s/ Jack C. Bridges     
| |  | Jack C. Bridges         
| |  | Executive Vice-President
| | 
| |  | August 11, 2004         
| |  | Date
# Arrêt du Tribunal

1..
: Acts of the institutions – Temporal scope – Immediate application of a new procedural rule – Retroactive effect of a substantive rule – Conditions – Rules concerning Community assistance

2..
: Economic and social cohesion – Structural assistance – Community funding – Commission's powers of review – Scope

3..
: Economic and social cohesion – Structural assistance – Community funding – Obligation on applicants for, and beneficiaries of, EAGGF assistance to provide information and act in good faith – Compliance with the conditions laid down in the decision to grant assistance – Compliance with the information contained in the application for assistance

4..
: Economic and social cohesion – Structural assistance – Community funding – Commission's powers to carry out on-the-spot checks and inspections – Option for the Commission to use the results of a check carried out in the context of national criminal proceedings – Non-binding nature of those results

5..
: Economic and social cohesion – Structural assistance – Community funding – Correspondence between the financing and a service essential for the implementation of the project – Burden of proof on the beneficiary

6..
: Economic and social cohesion – Structural assistance – Community funding – Withdrawal of assistance – Need for a clear and unequivocal legal basis

1.
:

2.
:

3.
:

4.
:

5.
:

6.
:

:

: Legal background

1
:

2
:

3
:

4
:

5
:

6
:

7
:

8
:

─
:

─
:

I ─
:

9
:

10
:

II ─
:

11
:

12
:

13
:

14
:

15
:

16
:

17
:

III ─
:

18
:

19
:

20
:

IV ─
:

21
:

22
:

23
:

24
:

V ─
:

25
:

26
:

27
:

28
:

29
:

30
:

31
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

32
:

33
:

─
:

─
:

I ─
:

34
:

A ─
:

35
:

36
:

37
:

B ─
:

38
:

39
:

40
:

41
:

42
:

43
:

44
:

45
:

46
:

C ─
:

47
:

48
:

49
:

50
:

51
:

52
:

53
:

54
:

55
:

56
:

57
:

58
:

59
:

60
:

61
:

62
:

63
:

64
:

65
:

66
:

67
:

68
:

D ─
:

69
:

70
:

71
:

72
:

73
:

74
:

E ─
:

75
:

76
:

77
:

78
:

79
:

80
:

81
:

82
:

83
:

84
:

85
:

86
:

87
:

88
:

89
:

90
:

91
:

92
:

93
:

94
:

95
:

96
:

97
:

98
:

99
:

100
:

101
:

102
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

103
:

104
:

105
:

106
:

107
:

108
:

109
:

110
:

111
:

112
:

113
:

114
:

115
:

116
:

117
:

118
:

119
:

120
:

121
:

122
:

123
:

124
:

125
:

126
:

127
:

128
:

129
:

130
:

131
:

132
:

133
:

134
:

135
:

136
:

137
:

138
:

139
:

140
:

141
:

142
:

143
:

144
:

145
:

146
:

147
:

148
:

149
:

150
:

151
:

152
:

153
:

154
:

155
:

156
:

157
:

158
:

159
:

160
:

161
:

162
:

163
:

164
:

165
:

166
:

167
:

168
:

169
:

170
:

171
:

172
:

173
:

174
:

175
:

176
:

177
:

178
:

179
:

180
:

181
:

182
:

183
:

184
:

185
:

186
:

187
:

188
:

189
:

190
:

191
:

192
:

193
:

F ─
:

194
:

195
:

196
:

197
:

198
:

199
:

II ─
:

200
:

III ─
:

201
:

IV ─
:

202
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

203
:

204
:

205
:

206
:

:

1.
:

2.
:

---

1 –
: Language of the case: Italian.
#### § 905.762 Criteria for designating areas as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.

Part 762 of this chapter, *Criteria for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* shall apply to surface coal mining operations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED)
AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                            1,540
<SECURITIES>                                                      5,151
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     1,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       (319)
<INVENTORY>                                                       4,117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 13,039
<PP&E>                                                           16,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   12,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   21,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             2,420
<BONDS>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                             98
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                       18,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     21,152
<SALES>                                                          12,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 12,314
<CGS>                                                             6,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     6,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  3,770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   1,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     (1,710)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               3,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      3,610
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       .37



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1*








Section
      1350 Certification








I,
      Richard M. Haddock, the chief
      executive officer of LaserCard Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of
      the United States Code that, to my knowledge:





(i)           
      the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending
      December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934, and





(ii)           
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date:  February
      5, 2008








/s/
      Richard M.
      Haddock


Richard
      M. Haddock








_______________________




*           
      The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC
      and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
      the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether
      made
      before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 99.01

                                  Sbarro, Inc.
                                  401 Broadhollow Road
                                  Melville, New York 11747

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                        March 25, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T of Article 3 of Regulation S-X, we are filing
this  letter as an exhibit to our Annual  Report on Form 10-K for our year ended
December 30, 2001 (the "Report"). The Report contains financial statements as at
and for the year ended  December  30, 2001 that were  audited  (the  "Audit") by
Arthur Andersen LLP  ("Andersen").  This will serve to confirm that Andersen has
represented  to us that the Audit was  subject  to  Andersen's  quality  control
system for the U.S.  accounting  and  auditing  practice  to provide  reasonable
assurance  that the  engagement  was conducted in compliance  with  professional
standards  and that  there was  appropriate  continuity  of  Andersen  personnel
working  on  the  Audit  and  availability  of  national  office   consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign  affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to
the Audit.

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Steven B. Graham,
                                        Vice President and Controller
§ 107.4 Policy. ( a ) It is the policy of the Department of Defense that when in-house sources are insufficient to support the medical mission of the Military Departments, personal services contracts under 10 U.S.C. 1091 may be executed.
( b ) It is the purpose of personal services contracts to facilitate mission accomplishment, maximize beneficiary access to military MTFs, maintain readiness capability, reduce use of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS), and enhance quality of care by promoting the continuity of the patient/provider relationship.
( c ) Personal services contractors shall be subject to the same quality assurance, credentialing processes, and other standards as those required of military health care providers. In addition, providers, other than para-professionals, must be licensed in accordance with State or host country requirements to perform the contract services.
( d ) In establishing lines of authority and accountability, DoD supervisors may direct the activities of personal services contractors on the same basis as DoD employees. However, the rights, benefits, and compensation of personal services contractors shall be determined solely in accordance with the personal service contract.
( e ) Requests for personal services contracts contemplating reimbursement at the maximum rate of basic pay and allowances under 10 U.S.C. 1091 shall be approved at the major command level. The 0-6 grade shall be used sparingly and subsequently will be subject to review.
Exhibit No. 32.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), R. Allan Bradley, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard J. Doleshek, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR PIPELINE COMPANY   March 11, 2010 /s/R. Allan Bradley ` R. Allan Bradley President and Chief Executive Officer    March 11, 2010 /s/Richard J. Doleshek Richard J. Doleshek Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Austin J. Boudreau, Respondent. Ford Motor Company, Appellant; Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. The employer on May 22, 1958 posted a notice stating that production in its automobile plant at Green Island would cease for a week beginning May 23. Operation would be resumed June 2. A union contract provided for three weeks’ paid vacation to be scheduled usually between May 15 and September 30, the time being fixed “with due consideration, however, to the wishes of employees”. Claimant requested a week of his paid vacation during the period of shutdown. TMs was allowed by the company. Claimant returned to work when the plant reopened June 2; he took the remaining two weeks vacation in July. He filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits during the week beginning May 25. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, reversing a decision of the Referee holding claimant ineligible, held that claimant was entitled to benefits. We hold the Referee was right; the board wrong. The statute, amended in 1957 to clarify judicial interpretations of the meaning of “ vacation ”, as well as uncertainties in administrative rulings, now provides (Unemployment Insurance Law, § 591, subd. 3, par. [a]) that no benefits are payable where there is “a temporary respite from work” for which vacation allowance is paid and where the claimant is “ substantially fully employed ” by the employer during the week before and the week after the vacation period. Each of these clear criteria is shown to exist in this case. Claimant need not have applied for vacation allowance in the week in question; in wMch event he would have been entitled to benefits under the statute. But within these statutory definitions he is not entitled to both vacation pay and unemployment benefits. That this was not a “temporary respite from work” is, in the light' of claimant’s own application for vacation pay during a period covered by the collective bargaining agreement, a resort to an abstraction removed from the realities of the case. It departs from the intention of the statute. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reversed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
§ 947.816 Performance standards—surface mining activities. ( a ) Part 816 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Surface Mining Activities,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) All operators shall have a plan of reclamation approved by the Washington Department of Fisheries for operation in affected streams, RCW 75, and shall comply with the Hydraulic Project Approval Law, RCW 75.20.100, the Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58, the Forest Practices Act, RCW 76.09, the Water Pollution Control Act, RCW 90.48, the Minimum Water Flows and Levels Act, RCW 90.22, and the Pesticide Control Act, RCW 15.58, and regulations promulgated pursuant to these laws.
|   **Subsidiaries**                           |   |  **Jurisdiction                of****Incorporation** |   | **Percentage****Owned                By****Registrant** |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Simclar                (Mexico) Inc.                   |   | Illinois                                                  |   | 100%                                                    |
| Techdyne                (Europe) Limited               |   | Scotland                                                  |   | 100%                                                    |
| Simclar                Interconnect Technologies, Inc. |   | Delaware                                                  |   | 100%                                                    |
| Simclar                (North America), Inc.           |   | North                Carolina                             |   | 100%                                                    |
| Simclar                de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.         |   | Mexico                                                    |   | 100%                owned by Simclar (Mexico) Inc.      |
| Techdyne                (Livingston) Limited           |   | Scotland                                                  |   | 100%                owned by Techdyne (Europe) Limited  |

----