Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 58459 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project 

Officer, First Coast Guard District, 

telephone (212) 668–7165, email 

judy.k.leung-yee@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing the docket, call 

Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Quogue Bridge, across Quogue Channel, 

mile 1.1, at Southampton, New York, 

has a vertical clearance in the closed 

position of 15 feet at mean high water 

and 16 feet at mean low water. The 

existing drawbridge operation 

regulations are listed at 33 CFR 

117.799(d). 

The owner of the bridge, Suffolk 

County Department of Public Works, 

requested a temporary deviation to 

facilitate rehabilitation at the bridge. 

The waterway has commercial and 

seasonal recreational vessels of various 

sizes. 

Under this temporary deviation the 

draw of the Quogue Bridge, mile 1.1, 

across Quogue Canal may keep one lift 

span in the closed position from 

October 1, 2013 through March 28, 

2014. 

The Coast Guard contacted all known 

commercial waterway users regarding 

this deviation and no objections were 

received. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the bridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the designated time period. This 

deviation from the operating regulations 

is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: September 13, 2013. 

Gary Kassof, 

Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard 

District. 

[FR Doc. 2013–23113 Filed 9–23–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0853; FRL–9832–9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley 

Air Quality Management District, Santa 

Barbara County Air Pollution Control 

District, South Coast Air Quality 

Management District and Ventura 

County Air Pollution Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of 

revisions to the Antelope Valley Air 

Quality Management District 

(AVAQMD), Santa Barbara County Air 

Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD), 

South Coast Air Quality Management 

District (SCAQMD) and Ventura County 

Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) 

portions of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). This action 

was proposed in the Federal Register on 

April 29, 2013 and concerns volatile 

organic compound (VOC) from motor 

vehicle and mobile equipment coating 

operations and from graphic arts 

operations. We are approving local rules 

that regulate these emission sources 

under the Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’ or ‘‘the 

Act’’). 

DATES: These rules will be effective on 

October 24, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket 

number EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0853 for 

this action. Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California 94105–3901. 

While all documents in the docket are 

listed at http://www.regulations.gov, 

some information may be publicly 

available only at the hard copy location 

(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, 

multi-volume reports), and some may 

not be available in either location (e.g., 

confidential business information 

(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Adrianne Borgia, EPA Region IX, (415) 

972–3576, borgia.adrianne@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On April 29, 2013 (78 FR 25011), EPA 

proposed to approve the following rules 

into the California SIP. 

Local agency Rule # Rule title Amended/ 

revised Submitted 

AVAQMD .......... 1151 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations ......... Amended 6/19/12 .......... 9/21/12 

SBCAPCD ......... 339 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations ......... Revised 6/19/08 ............. 10/20/08 

SCAQMD .......... 1151 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations.Amended 12/2/05 .......... 4/6/09 

VCAPCD ........... 74.18 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations ......... Revised 11/11/08 ........... 3/17/09 

VCAPCD ........... 74.19 Graphic Arts ................................................................................. Revised 6/14/11 ............. 9/27/11 

We proposed to approve these rules 

because we determined that they 

complied with the relevant CAA 

requirements. Our proposed action 

contains more information on the rules 

and our evaluation. 

II. Public Comments and EPA 

Responses 

EPA’s proposed action provided a 30- 

day public comment period. During this 

period, we received no comments. 

III. EPA Action 

No comments were submitted. 

Therefore, as authorized in section 

110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully 

approving these rules into the California 

SIP. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves State law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. For that reason, 

this action: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
58460 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address 

disproportionate human health or 

environmental effects with practical, 

appropriate, and legally permissible 

methods under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: June 26, 2013. 

Alexis Strauss, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220, is amended by 

adding paragraphs (c)(361)(i)(A)(3), 

(c)(363)(i)(E), (c)(366)(i)(B)(4), 

(c)(404)(i)(C)(2) and (c)(423)(i)(D)(2) to 

read as follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(361) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(A) * * * 

(3) Rule 339, ‘‘Motor Vehicle and 

Mobile Equipment Coating Operations,’’ 

revised on June 19, 2008. 

* * * * * 

(363) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(E) Ventura County Air Pollution 

Control District. 

(1) Rule 74.18, ‘‘Motor Vehicle and 

Mobile Equipment Coating Operations,’’ 

revised on November 11, 2008. 

* * * * * 

(366) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(B) * * * 

(4) Rule 1151, ‘‘Motor Vehicle and 

Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line 

Coating Operations,’’ amended on 

December 2, 2005. 

* * * * * 

(404) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) * * * 

(2) Rule 74.19, ‘‘Graphic Arts,’’ 

revised on June 14, 2011. 

* * * * * 

(423) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(D) * * * 

(2) Rule 1151, ‘‘Motor Vehicle and 

Mobile Equipment Coating Operations,’’ 

amended on June 19, 2012. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–23062 Filed 9–23–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0094; FRL–9833–1] 

Revision of Air Quality Implementation 

Plan; California; Placer County Air 

Pollution Control District and Feather 

River Air Quality Management District; 

Stationary Source Permits 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule and technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing a limited 

approval and limited disapproval of two 

permitting rules submitted by California 

as a revision to the Placer County Air 

Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) and 

Feather River Air Quality Management 

District (FRAQMD) portion of the 

California State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). These revisions were proposed in 

the Federal Register on February 22, 

2013 and concern construction and 

modification of stationary sources of air 

pollution within each District. We are 

approving local rules that regulate these 

emission sources under the Clean Air 

Act as amended in 1990 (CAA). Final 

approval of these rules makes the rules 

federally enforceable and corrects 

program deficiencies identified in a 

previous EPA rulemaking (76 FR 44809, 

July 27, 2011). EPA is also making a 

technical amendment to the Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR) to reflect this 

previous rulemaking, which removed an 

obsolete provision from the California 

SIP. 

DATES: This rule is effective on October 

24, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket 

number EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0094 for 

this action. Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California. While all documents are 

listed at www.regulations.gov, some 

information may be publicly available 

only at the hard copy location (e.g., 

copyrighted material, large maps, multivolume reports), and some may not be 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES