alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                         119,810
<SECURITIES>                                     7,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,415
<PP&E>                                         286,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                     220,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,649
<SALES>                                        337,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               349,435
<CGS>                                           69,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,197
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,115
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,082
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,082
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.76
        

</TABLE>
§ 880.5 Definitions. As used in the regulations in this part and in cooperative agreements, entered into pursuant to the regulations in this part: ( a ) *Government* means the United States of America;
( b ) *Commission* means the Appalachian Regional Development Commission established by section 101 of the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965;
( c ) *Local authorities* means the State or local governmental bodies organized and existing under the authority of State laws, including, but not limited to, a county, city, township, town, or borough;
( d ) *Approved abandoned mine reclamation program* means a program meeting the requirements defined in section 405 of PL 95-87, as amended;
( e ) *Operating coal mine* means a coal mine for which the regulatory authority has not terminated its jurisdiction as set out under 30 CFR 700.11(d)(1);
( f ) *Inactive coal mine* means a coal mine for which the regulatory authority has terminated its jurisdiction as set out under 30 CFR 700.11(d)(1);
( g ) *Project* means a project whose purpose is to control or extinguish fires in coal formations.
( h ) Reclamation plan or State reclamation plan means a plan that a State or Indian tribe submitted and that we approved under section 405 of SMCRA and part 884 of this chapter.
[48 FR 37378, Aug. 18, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 59 FR 52377, Oct. 17, 1994; 73 FR 67642, Nov. 14, 2008]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Christopher W. Vieth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2003 of Dow Jones & Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report, based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003


/s/ Christopher W. Vieth
------------------------
Christopher W. Vieth
Chief Financial Officer

                                     Page 1
§ 1624.10 Order to report for examination. ( a ) The Director of Selective Service may order any registrant in Class 1-A who has filed a claim for classification in a class other than Class 1-A or whose induction has been postponed, to report for an Armed Forces examination to determine acceptability for military service. The date specified to report for examination shall be at least 7 days after the date on which the Order to Report for Examination is issued. Such registrant will not be inducted until his claim for reclassification has been decided or abandoned.
( b ) The reporting date for examination may be postponed for any reason a reporting date for induction may be postponed in accord with § 1624.6 (b), (d) or (f)(1).
( c ) If a registrant fails to report for or complete an examination, the local board will determine that he has abandoned his claim.
( d ) If a registrant is determined not acceptable for military service, he will be reclassified in Class 4-F.
( e ) If a registrant is determined acceptable for military service, the processing of his claim will be completed.
[52 FR 24455, July 1, 1987]
# C_2008171EN.01004802.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/48

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 7 May 2008 — Germany and Deutsche Post v Commission

(Case T-490/04 and T-493/04) (1)

1

(2008/C 171/92)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 5.2.2005.

1

---
#### In the Matter of the Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of the Town of North Hempstead, Appellant, v. Howard Phipps, Respondent.

In a condemnation proceeding under the Nassau County Administrative Code and the Nassau County Civil Divisions Act, to acquire title to a certain portion of claimant’s land, described as “ Damage Parcel No. 1,” to be used as the site of a public high school, the petitioner, the Board of Education appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a partial final decree of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 28, 1960 upon the decision of the court after a nonjury trial, as awarded to the claimant: (a) $200,400 for his direct damage for the taking of the portion of his land; and (b) $17,750 for his severance or consequential damage to his remaining contiguous land. Petitioner contended: (1) that the $200,400 award, based on a valuation of $6,000 an acre for the portion taken, was excessive and contrary to the weight of the evidence; and (2) that the claimant failed to prove loss or diminution in value to the untaken remainder which would justify any award for consequential damages. Decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
§ 910.784 Underground mining permit applications—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan. ( a ) Part 784 of this chapter, *Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct underground mining.
( b ) The applicant for a permit to conduct underground mining operations shall demonstrate compliance with Chapter 391-3-1 of the Rules and Regulations of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources.
### Revised nomenclature and stratigraphic relationships of the Fredericksburg Complex and Quantico Formation of the Virginia Piedmont

By: Louis Pavlides

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1146

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Companion File:  **Companion Files**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT
32.1*








Section
1350 Certification








I, Robert T. DeVincenzi, the chief
executive officer of LaserCard Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of
the United States Code that, to my knowledge:





(i)           the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





(ii)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August
5, 2008








/s/Robert T.
DeVincenzi


Robert T.
DeVincenzi








_______________________





*           The
material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
### §441j. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 441j, comprising section 1011 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3201 of this title.
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Closed to Mineral Materials

Sage-grouse Priority/Core Habitat Areas

Sage-grouse Connectivity Habitat Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2-14: Alternative A

Areas Closed to Mineral Materials
EXHIBIT 32

CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION

CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

We, Andrew F. Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Phillip A. Reinsch, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Capstead Mortgage Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                                                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 25, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBS                                                   
|                        |  |     |  | Andrew F. Jacobs President and Chief Executive Officer                 
|                        |  |    
|Date: February 25, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCH                                                 
|                        |  |     |  | Phillip A. Reinsch Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §4315. Regulations

The Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations to carry out the purpose of this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title IV, §405(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1170.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 9 months after Oct. 13, 1978, and congressional review of provisions of sections 401 through 412 of Pub. L. 95–454, see section 415(a)(1), (b), of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 3131 of this title.
#### § 942.845 Civil penalties.

Part 845 of this chapter, *Civil Penalties,* shall apply to the assessment of civil penalties for violations on coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial
information extracted from Balance Sheets and Statement
of Operations for the year ended December 31, 1995 Form
10K of Delphi Film Associates IV and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          185,000
<SECURITIES>                           1,227,000
<RECEIVABLES>                          1,400,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,825,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                             2,757,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,825,000
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            87,000
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 457,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (32,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                           (32,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (4.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
#### The Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company, Respondent, *v.*George W. Nelson et al., Appellants.

(Argued January 31, 1882;

decided February 10, 1882.)

*Thomas E. Pea/rsall*for appellants.

*A. J. Vanderjpoel*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
#### Jerome L. Green, appellee, v. Foreman & Clark, a corporation, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,848.

Action to recover for services as clothing salesman. Judgment *655for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John J. Lupe, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 11, 1925.

Rehearing denied May 25, 1925.

Urion, Drueker, Reichmann & Boutell, for appellant.

Frank & Rosenfeld, for appeEee.

Mr. Justice Johnston

deUvered the opinion of the court.
#### In the Matter of AIG Claims Services, Inc., on Behalf of New Hampshire Insurance Company, Appellant, v Adam Bobak, Respondent.

[835 NYS2d 925]—

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph G. Makowski, J), entered August 17, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. The order granted the petition *1179in part and stayed the supplementary uninsured motorist arbitration for 90 days to allow for appropriate discovery by petitioner concerning the uninsured motorist claim pending before the arbitrator.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by providing that the arbitration is stayed pending determination of the issues of insurance coverage and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this action on behalf of the New Hampshire Insurance Company (NHIC) pursuant to CPLR article 75, seeking a permanent stay of arbitration of a claim by respondent against NHIC for supplementary uninsured motorist (SUM) coverage. In the alternative, petitioner sought a temporary stay of arbitration to permit it to join all parties necessary to determine the coverage issues and for a trial on those issues, or to enable it to conduct discovery with respect to the underlying claim. Respondent allegedly sustained serious injuries in an accident in Pennsylvania when the tractor-trailer he was operating for his employer was struck by objects that fell from a truck leased by B-Right Trucking Company, Inc. (B-Right) and owned by Ryder Leasing Company (Ryder). He commenced an action in Pennsylvania against, inter alia, B-Right and Ryder. After B-Right’s insurer, Reliance National Indemnity Company (Reliance), became insolvent, respondent submitted a claim for SUM benefits under his employer’s policy with NHIC, and then sought arbitration of that claim. Supreme Court granted the petition insofar as it sought a temporary stay, granting petitioner a 90-day stay of the SUM arbitration “in order to allow for appropriate discovery by the Petitioner concerning the uninsured motorist claim now pending before the [arbitrator].”

The parties agree that another insurer issued an excess policy covering B-Right’s leased trucks, and there is no reliable evidence in the record whether that insurer has disclaimed coverage. Similarly, the record does not establish whether Ryder had insurance coverage that might benefit respondent, or whether the liquidation of Reliance’s assets will provide any benefits to respondent. During the pendency of this appeal, a proceeding was commenced by NHIC in Pennsylvania seeking resolution of those issues. Thus, we conclude that “[a]rbitration should be stayed, not permanently, but pending the determination of the issue[s] of insurance coverage” *(Matter of Hall [Royal Indem. Ins. Co.],*34 AD2d 1090, 1091 [1970]; *see also Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Basedow,*28 AD3d 766, 767-768 [2006]). *1180We therefore modify the order accordingly. Present—Martoche, J.P., Smith, Lunn, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the Report) to the Annual
Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, H. R. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 29, 2005



/s/ H. R. BrownH. R. BrownPresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.