alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1996 ANNUAL REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,313
<SECURITIES>                                       780
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,785
<PP&E>                                         125,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,384
<BONDS>                                         20,937
<COMMON>                                         2,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,523
<SALES>                                          2,639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,933
<CGS>                                            2,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of West End Neighborhood Taxpayers, Inc., Petitioners, v New York State Board of Real Property Services et al., Respondents.

[832 NYS2d 442]—

*765Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and RPTL 1218 and 1314 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Real Property Services, dated July 27, 2006, which, inter alia, denied the petitioners’ application for a segment special equalization rate for the 2006-2007 school year for that segment of the Ossining Union Free School District which is located in the Town of New Castle. Motion by the respondent New York State Board of Real Property Services to dismiss the petition on the ground that the petitioners lack standing.

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The proceeding must be dismissed because the petitioners lack standing to sue. “The question of standing to challenge particular governmental action may ... be answered by the statute at issue, which may identify the class of persons entitled to seek review” *(Society of Plastics Indus. v County of Suffolk,*77 NY2d 761, 769 [1991]). Here, the statute at issue, RPTL 1218, “the sole statute authorizing judicial review of equalization rates” *(Matter of Town of Riverhead v New York State Bd. of Real Prop. Servs.,*5 NY3d 36, 42 [2005]) “creates a right to seek review of a certain determination made by the New York State Board of Real Property . . . only upon the municipality whose equalization rate was established” *(Matter of Town of Riverhead v New York State Off. of Real Prop. Servs.,*21 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2005]). The petitioners fall outside of the limited class authorized by the statute *(see Matter of Town of Riverhead v New York State Off. of Real Prop. Servs., supra,*21 AD3d at 1118; *see generally Matter of Feiner v New York State Off. of Real Prop. Servs.,*25 AD3d 1005, 1006-1007 [2006]; *Matter of Town of Riverhead v New York State Bd. of Real Prop. Servs.,*7 AD3d 934, 935 [2004], *affd*5 NY3d 36 [2005]). Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Carni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10(xviii)

BANK OF SCOTLAND

Techdyne, Inc.
Commission File No. 0-14659
2230 West 77th Street
Hialeach, Florida  33016

17th January, 2003

Dear Sirs:

TERM LOAN FACILITIES OF $7,000,000

We refer to the Facility Letter dated 2nd October 2001 between The Governor and
Company of the Bank of Scotland ("BOS") and Techdyne, Inc. (the "Company") in
respect of term loan facilities of US $7,000,000, as amended, restated,
supplemented and novated from time to time (the "Facility Letter").

Whereas the Company and BOS wish to amend the Facility Letter on the terms and
conditions set out below and it is hereby agreed that:

In Schedule 4 (Financial Covenants) to the Facility Letter in Clause 1.1 (Net
Worth) paragraph 1.1.3 shall be deleted and replaced with the following new
paragraph 1.1.3:

"1.1.3   (i)      US$10,000,000 for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 March 2003
                  inclusive;

         (ii)     US$10,000,000 for the period 1 April 2003 to 30 June 2003
                  inclusive;

         (iii)    US$10,500,000 for the period 1 July 2003 to 30 September 2003
                  inclusive; and

         (iv)     US$11,000,000 for the period commencing 1 October 2003 and
                  thereafter."

The representations, warranties, undertakings and covenants in the Facility
Letter are deemed to be repeated by the Company as at the date of execution by
the Company of this letter.

Words and expressions used in this letter shall, except where the context
otherwise requires, bear the same meaning as in the Facility Letter.

Except as herein expressly amended, the whole terms and conditions of the
Facility Letter are hereby confirmed and this letter and the Facility Letter
shall read and construe as one document.

The Company shall pay BOS a fee of (pound)250 (plus VAT) on the date hereof in
respect of BOS's legal costs and expenses relative to the preparation and
execution of this letter.


<PAGE>


This letter shall be governed by and construed in accordance with Scots law and
the parties hereto submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Scottish Courts.

Yours faithfully

For and on behalf of
THE GOVERNOR AND COMPANY OF THE
BANK OF SCOTLAND

Agreed and accepted
For and on behalf of
TECHDYNE, INC.
acting by

/s/ Thomas Foggo
________________________________________ Director

Thomas Foggo
________________________________________ Director

Date: 22 January 2003
      __________________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RYLAND
ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION FOUR FORM 10-K405 FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 12/31/95 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                              11
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  454200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         437376
<COMMON>                                            10
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    454200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 44557
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               44436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     11
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  7
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         7
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §3042. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXVII, §6742(b)(3), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2240

Section, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title I, §107, formerly §103, 61 Stat. 499; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §50, 68 Stat. 1244; renumbered §107, Pub. L. 102–496, title VII, §705(a)(2), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3190, related to emergency preparedness functions of the Director of the Office of Defense Mobilization.
§ 1615.1 Registration. ( a ) Registration under selective service law consists of: ( 1 ) Completing a registration card or other method of registration prescribed by the Director of Selective Service by a person required to register; and
( 2 ) The recording of the registration information furnished by the registrant in the records (master computer file) of the Selective Service System. Registration is completed when both of these actions have been accomplished.
( b ) The Director of Selective Service will furnish to each registrant a verification notice that includes a copy of the information pertaining to his registration that has been recorded in the records of the Selective Service System together with a correction form. If the information is correct, the registrant should take no action. If the information is incorrect, the registrant should forthwith furnish the correct information to the Director of Selective Service. If the registrant does not receive the verification notice within 90 days after he completed a method of registration prescribed by the Director, he shall advise in writing the Selective Service System, P.O. Box 94638, Palatine, IL 60094-4638.
( c ) The methods of registration prescribed by the Director include completing a Selective Service Registration Card at a classified Post Office, registration on the Selective Service Internet web site (*http://www.sss.gov*), telephonic registration, registration on approved Federal and State Government forms, registration through high school and college registrars, and Selective Service remainder mailback card.
[45 FR 48130, July 18, 1980, as amended at 65 FR 47670, Aug. 3, 2000; 65 FR 60101, Oct. 10, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 244 (Friday, December 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 82461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28135]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 1:00 p.m., December 18, 2020.

PLACE: This meeting will be held via teleconference.

STATUS: Closed. The Board invoked the exemption described in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(2) and 10 CFR 1704.4(b). The Board determined that it is 
necessary to close this meeting to the public since an open meeting 
would likely disclose information related solely to the internal 
personnel rules and practices of the agency.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: At this meeting, members of the Board will 
receive a staff briefing and deliberate on appropriate agency 
reorganization to accommodate the Executive Director of Operations 
position.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Tara Tadlock, Director of Board 
Operations, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue 
NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This is a 
toll-free number.

    Dated: December 16, 2020.
Thomas Summers,
Acting Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2020-28135 Filed 12-16-20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

MOISES GOMEZ, a.k.a. Santiago, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-10155 

D.C. No. 1:95-cr-00476-HG-7 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Helen W. Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2019**

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Moises Gomez appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his second 

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether the district court 

had authority to reduce a defendant’s sentence under section 3582, see United 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-10155 

States v. Leniear, 574 F.3d 668, 672 (9th Cir. 2009), and we affirm.

 Gomez contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under 

Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court correctly found 

that Gomez is ineligible for a reduction because, given the drug quantity 

attributable to Gomez, Amendment 782 did not have the effect of lowering the 

guideline range applicable to him. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B); Leniear, 574 

F.3d at 673-74. 

Gomez also argues that he is entitled to a reduction due to his conditions of 

confinement and the district court’s alleged errors in imposing his original

sentence. We do not reach these arguments because they are outside the scope of a 

section 3582(c)(2) proceeding. See Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 825-826, 

831 (2010). 

AFFIRMED.
§ 937.764 Process for designating areas unsuitable for surface coal mining operations. Part 764 of this chapter, *State Processes for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* pertaining to petitioning, initial processing, hearing requirements, decisions, data base and inventory systems, public information, and with the February 26, 1980, May 16, 1980, and August 15, 1980, opinions and orders of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (*In re: Permanent Surface Mining Regulation Litigation* (Civ. Action No. 79-1144)). ( a ) NDAC 69-05.2-25-0shall apply to any person who conducts or seeks to conduct coal exploration operations.
( b ) The Office shall make every effort to act on an exploration application within 60 days of receipt or such longer time as may be reasonable under the circumstances. If additional time is needed, OSMRE shall notify the applicant that the application is being reviewed, but more time is necessary to complete such review, setting forth the reasons and the additional time that is needed.
( c ) Where coal exploration is to occur on State lands or the minerals to be explored are owned by the State, a mineral lease issued by the Oregon Division of Lands authorizing the coal exploration is required to be filed with the permit application.
[52 FR 13812, Apr. 24, 1987]
### §4516. Designation of energy as a strategic and critical material

For purposes of this chapter, "energy" shall be designated as a "strategic and critical material" after June 30, 1980: Provided, That no provision of this chapter shall, by virtue of such designation 1 grant any new direct or indirect authority to the President for the mandatory allocation or pricing of any fuel or feedstock (including, but not limited to, crude oil, residual fuel oil, any refined petroleum product, natural gas, or coal) or electricity or any other form of energy.

(Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, title I, §106, as added Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §103, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 617; amended Pub. L. 111–67, §5, Sept. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2009.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section, see section 4564(a) of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, 64 Stat. 798, known as the Defense Production Act of 1950, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 4501 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 2076 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–67 substituted "such designation" for "such designation—" and "energy." for "energy; or", struck out par. (1) designation before "grant any new direct or indirect authority to the President for", and struck out par. (2) which read as follows: "grant any new direct or indirect authority to the President to engage in the production of energy in any manner whatsoever (such as oil and gas exploration and development, or any energy facility construction), except as expressly provided in sections 305 and 306 [of act Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932] for synthetic fuel production."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective June 30, 1980, see section 107 of Pub. L. 96–294, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 4502 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Hours and Earnings in the Fertilizer Industry, January 1943

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Hours and Earnings in the Fertilizer Industry, January 1943 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 751*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1943,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4236,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6



                    AMENDMENT TO DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN

         Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         The maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued under
the Plan shall be increased by 35,000 shares.

                    Approved by Shareholders on May 29, 1998




                                       1
*

The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3783

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Patrick L. Bark, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 20, 2002

Filed: May 29, 2002

___________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

On appeal from the district court's*

 revocation of Patrick L. Bark's supervised

release and imposition of an additional term of imprisonment, Bark's counsel has filed

a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Although Bark was granted permission to file a supplemental brief, he has not done

so.
-2-

Having reviewed counsel's Anders brief, we reject counsel's argument that the

district court abused its discretion by imposing imprisonment in excess of the Chapter

7 Sentencing Guidelines range and by not considering the severity of Bark's medical

condition. (Bark testified he needed double knee replacements and had been unable

to have the surgery in prison.) The Chapter 7 ranges are merely advisory, see United

States v. Holmes, 283 F.3d 966, 968 (8th Cir. 2002), and the district court–which was

fully apprised of Barks's medical condition–was not required to impose a lesser

sentence on that basis. Indeed, the district court considered the Chapter 7 policy

statements and believed the Guidelines range was inadequate to promote respect for

the law, afford adequate deterrents to criminal conduct, and protect the public from

further crimes.

Having reviewed the record independently, we find no other nonfrivolous

issues for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We thus affirm the

district court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.