alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 150.21 Appeals by the United States. ( a ) *Restricted filing.* Only a representative of the government designated by the Judge Advocate General of the respective service may file an appeal by the United States under Article 62.
( b ) *Counsel.* Counsel must be qualified and appointed, and give notice of appearance in accordance with this part and those of the Judge Advocate General concerned.
( c ) *Form of appeal.* The appeal must include those documents specified by Rule for Courts-Martial 908 and by applicable regulations of the Secretary concerned. A certificate of the Notice of Appeal described in Rule for Courts-Martial 908(b)(3) must be included. The certificate of service must reflect the date and time of the military judge's ruling or order from which the appeal is taken, and the time and date of service upon the military judge.
( d ) *Time for filing.* All procedural Rules of the Court shall apply except as noted in this paragraph: ( 1 ) The representative of the government designated by the Judge Advocate General shall decide whether to file the appeal with the Court. The trial counsel shall have 20 days from the date written notice to appeal is filed with the trial court to forward the appeal, including an original and two copies of the record of trial, to the representative of the government designated by the Judge Advocate General. The person designated by the Judge Advocate General shall promptly file the original record with the Clerk of the Court and forward one copy to opposing counsel. Appellate government counsel shall have 20 days (or more upon a showing of good cause made by motion for enlargement within the 20 days) from the date the record is filed with the Court to file the appeal with supporting brief with the Court. Should the government decide to withdraw the appeal after the record is received by the Court, appellate government counsel shall notify the Court in writing. Appellate brief(s) shall be prepared in the manner prescribed by § 150.15.
( 2 ) Appellee shall prepare an answer in the manner prescribed by § 150.15 and shall file such answer within 20 days after any filing of the government brief.
( e ) The government shall diligently prosecute all appeals by the United States and the Court will give such appeals priority over all other proceedings where practicable.
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT NO. 31.3

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, R. Stan Puckett, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Greene
County Bancshares, Inc., certify that:

(1)   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of
      Greene County Bancshares, Inc.;

(2)   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report.

Date: September 12, 2005               /s/ R. Stan Puckett
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       R. Stan Puckett
                                       Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
                                       Officer

                                       1
# C_2011311EN.01003101.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-236/02) (1)

1

(Referral to the General Court after annulment - Civil service - Officials - Employment in a non-Member state - Reassignment of post and post holder - Rights of the defence - Claim for damages - Full jurisdiction)

2011/C 311/51

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: L. Garofolo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, application for annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 18 March 2002 which reassigned the applicant from the Directorate-General for Development, Commission Delegation in Luanda (Angola), to the Directorate General for Development in Brussels (Belgium), of all preliminary, connected or consecutive measures, in particular those relating to the recruitment of another official to occupy his post, of the Commission’s notes of 13 and 14 November 2001 and of the opinion or opinions of the External Service Steering Committee, and, second, a claim for allowances in connection with his duties in Angola and damages for harm suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 18 March 2002 which reassigned Mr Luigi Marcuccio from the Directorate-General for Development, Commission Delegation in Luanda (Angola), to the Directorate-General for Development in Brussels (Belgium). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 18 March 2002 which reassigned Mr Luigi Marcuccio from the Directorate-General for Development, Commission Delegation in Luanda (Angola), to the Directorate-General for Development in Brussels (Belgium).

| 2. | Dismisses the application as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the application as to the remainder.

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Marcucccio. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Marcucccio.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 28.9.2002.

1

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9777 

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 

to require any cost estimate for a bill or joint resolution prepared 

by the Congressional Budget Office to include the cost to each United 

States citizen for carrying out such measure, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 

Mr. BRECHEEN (for himself, Mr. SMUCKER, and Mr. LOPEZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to require any cost estimate for a 

bill or joint resolution prepared by the Congressional 

Budget Office to include the cost to each United States 

citizen for carrying out such measure, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9777 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCLUDING COSTS TO CITIZENS OF SPENDING 

2 IN CBO ESTIMATES. 

3 Section 402 of the Congressional Budget and Im4 poundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 653) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘The Director’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘(a) The Director’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(b) Any estimate prepared under subsection (a) 

10 shall include an estimate of the pro rata amount for each 

11 United States citizen of the total change (if any) during 

12 the period covered by the estimate under such subsection 

13 in the following if the applicable measure is carried out: 

14 ‘‘(1) Total Federal spending. 

15 ‘‘(2) Total Federal debt.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### §§91 to 94. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 91, act June 16, 1938, ch. 458, §1, 52 Stat. 707, authorized Secretary of War to place educational orders for munitions of special or technical design.

Section 92, act June 16, 1938, ch. 458, §2, 52 Stat. 708, related to production equipment.

Section 93, act June 16, 1938, ch. 458, §3, 52 Stat. 708, placed certain limitations on number of orders.

Section 94, acts June 16, 1938, ch. 458, §4, 52 Stat. 708; Apr. 3, 1939, ch. 35, §13, 53 Stat. 560, related to availability of appropriations for purposes of sections 91 to 94 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK RC2 Review.                    

*Date:*                         March 16, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jian Yang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7111, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7799,                         *yangj@extra.niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 9, 2020.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-27492 Filed 12-14-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
## Subpart G—Insurance and Annuities
November 7, 2012

RE: Jatropha

- based biodiesel and renewable diesel pathway petition DRAFT Jatropha Lit Review
Distributed: October 16, 2012

To Whom It May Concern:

Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc

. (GCEH) would like to add its comments on the DRAFT Jatropha Lit Review of the Jatropha

- based biodiesel and renewable diesel RFS2 pathway petition

. Generally, we agree with the technical findings of the report and do not have any additional sources of information to share with EPA or its affiliates. However, while the report is complete and exhaustive, w e believe it is framed in the wrong context, albeit a context
that is consist ent with the articles reviewed. The reference material is focused entirely on evaluat ing different production and ecological scenarios but does do not ad equately incorporat e economic considerations into the analysis

. A common finding is that severely degraded and marginal land once speculated as a possible, even a likely growing location for Jatropha would not produce commercially viable yields and that production would inevitably shift to land suitable for food crops . While this is theoretically possi ble

, we believe it is not likely given the relationship between the economics of food and energy crop productivity and yield

.
Novel energy crops, including Jatropha, produce a relatively low

- value crop per acre compared to traditional food crops. If land is suitable for both food and energy crop production

,

eco nomics would dictate the higher

- value crop is produced, absent subsidies or other public policy. Furthermore, the renewable biomass provision of RSF2 reduces any direct land use change (dLUC)

, like that from forest or rangeland to farming , that might otherwise occur. While concerns about crowding out food production may theoretically be valid, economic realities would reduce such displacement to a negligible level

. 

### Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.

100 W Broadway, Suite 650 Long Beach, CA 90802 Phone (310) 641

- 4234 Fax (310) 929

- 1065* * *

Again, we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the DRAFT Lit Review . We agree with many of the articles referenced in the review that Jatropha

- based biodiesel and renewable diesel meets or exceeds the 50 percent greenhouse gas emission reduction thresh old to qualify
for the biomass

- based diesel program . We urge EPA to expedite its modeling and approval of the Jatropha

- based biodiesel and renewable diesel petition and move towards finalizing the Jatropha pathway.

Sincerely,

Richard Palmer

Chief Executive Officer Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.
#### § 1699.151 Program accessibility: new construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handcapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151 through 4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 14-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
EXHIBIT 32



Certifications

Pursuant to
Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies that based on their knowledge (i) the foregoing annual report on Form 10-K filed by Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended June 30, 2005, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Fountain
Powerboat Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 13, 2005 |  | /S/ Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.        
|                       |  | Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.            
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       | 
|Date: October 13, 2005 |  | /S/ Irving L. Smith                  
|                       |  | Irving L. Smith                      
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>




                                                                  EXHIBIT 10 (b)


                    SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING MATERIAL DETAILS OF
                       EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS SUBSTANTIALLY
                  SIMILAR TO EXHIBIT 10 (b) FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                DECEMBER 31, 2001


                                                      EFFECTIVE
    NAME                                                DATE
    ----                                          ----------------
Ronald C. Baldwin                                 May 16, 2001
Thomas E. Hoaglin                                 February 15, 2001
Michael J. McMennamin                             November 14, 2000












                    SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING MATERIAL DETAILS OF
                       EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS SUBSTANTIALLY
                  SIMILAR TO EXHIBIT 10 (c) FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                DECEMBER 31, 2001



                                                      EFFECTIVE
    NAME                                                DATE
    ----                                          -----------------
    Daniel B. Benhase                             August 16, 2000
    Richard A. Cheap                              May 4, 1998
    Mary Navarro                                  July 16, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 84020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28443]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 23, 2020

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 7, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 181 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2021-41, CP2021-42.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2020-28443 Filed 12-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
§ 174.4 Policy. It is DoD policy to: ( a ) Act expeditiously whether closing or realigning. Relocating activities from installations designated for closure will, when feasible, be accelerated to facilitate the transfer of real property for community reuse. In the case of realignments, the Department will pursue aggressive planning and scheduling of related facility improvements at the receiving location.
( b ) Fully utilize all appropriate means to transfer property. Federal law provides the Department with an array of legal authorities, including public benefit transfers, economic development conveyances at cost and no cost, negotiated sales to state or local government, conservation conveyances, and public sales, by which to transfer property on closed or realigned installations. Recognizing that the variety of types of facilities available for civilian reuse and the unique circumstances of the surrounding communities does not lend itself to a single universal solution, the Department will use this array of authorities in a way that considers individual circumstances.
( c ) Rely on and leverage market forces. Community redevelopment plans and military conveyance plans should be integrated to the extent practical and should take account of any anticipated demand for surplus military land and facilities.
( d ) Collaborate effectively. Experience suggests that collaboration is the linchpin to successful installation redevelopment. Only by collaborating with the local community can the Department close and transfer property in a timely manner and provide a foundation for solid economic redevelopment.
( e ) Speak with one voice. The Department of Defense, acting through the DoD Components, will provide clear and timely information and will encourage affected communities to do the same.
( f ) Work with communities to address growth. The Department will work with the surrounding community so that the public and private sectors can provide the services and facilities needed to accommodate new personnel and their families. The Department recognizes that installation commanders and local officials, as appropriate (*e.g.*, State, county, and tribal), need to integrate and coordinate elements of their local and regional growth planning so that appropriate off-base facilities and services are available for arriving personnel and their families.
#### Luis Ayala, Respondent, v Louis A. Reyes et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 21, 1977, which denied their motion to dismiss the action. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident in October, 1975. Defendants moved to dismiss the action on the ground that it was barred by the Comprehensive Automobile Insurance Reparations Act (see Insurance Law, § 670 *et seq.).*A hearing was held on the motion before a referee designated to hear and determine the issues. Plaintiff established that his right hand, three fingers of which had been amputated after an accident in 1972, had been fractured in the accident which was the subject of this action. However, plaintiff did not offer any medical evidence on the nature of the fracture, or on its effect (see Insurance Law, § 671, subd 4). He did not show the nature or extent of any disability resulting from the fracture. Nor did plaintiff’s medical and hospital bills exceed $500. Plaintiff did not meet his burden of proof. The motion to dismiss should have been granted. Plaintiff should pursue his remedies under the Comprehensive Automobile Insurance Reparations Act. Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### Alessandrina Ruzzo et al., Appellants, v. Kingston Trust Company, as Executor of George F. Kaufman, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Motion to amend decision of July 27,1960 and order entered thereon so as to allow credit for a payment theretofore made to respondents Herzberg has .been rendered academic *961by said rspondents’ concession and is denied. Motion to amend said decision and order so as to make specific provision with respect to certain claims for credits for taxes paid, or in the alternative for other relief, is denied. These questions were not determinable upon the record before us and under the decision and order directing an accounting remain open for determination by the trial court upon a sufficient record.
#### § 937.955 Certification of blasters.

Part 955 of this chapter, *Certification of Blasters in Federal Program States and on Indian Lands,* shall apply to the training, examination and certification of blasters for surface coal mining and reclamation operations.

[51 FR 19462, May 29, 1986]