alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Mary Grace, Respondent, v. Board of Education of the City of New York et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding by petitioner pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, for reinstatement as a teacher of home economics in the City of New York as of September 8, 1960, and for other relief, the Board of Education and the Superintendent of Schools appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 26, 1962, which granted petitioner’s application and directed them to reinstate her. Order reversed on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed. The facts are affirmed. Petitioner served as a substitute teacher of home economics in the junior high schools of the City of New York from September, 1955 to September, 1959. Thereafter, the respondent board appointed her, effective as of September 9, 1959, as a regular teacher of home economies for a probationary period of three years. It has been conceded that her previous substitute service reduced this probationary period to one year (Education Law, *638§ 2573, subd. 1). On July 21, 1960 the board, accepting the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools, adopted a resolution terminating petitioner’s services as a teacher of home economics effective as of the close of business on September 8, 1960. Notice of such action was given petitioner on July 26, 1960. It was petitioner’s contention, and Special Term so held, that her probationary “year” terminated upon completion of the school year, June 30, 1960, and that the action of the board on July 21, 1960 was taken after she had acquired tenure and thus she could not be removed except for cause after a hearing. Subdivision 1 of section 2573 of the Education Law provides that in city school districts such as that of the City of New York, teachers must be appointed for a “ probationary period of not less than one year and not to exceed three years”. Section 58 of the General Construction Law defines a “year” in a statute to mean 365 days or 12 months. It follows that where a person is appointed for a probationary period of one year, that period is completed 12 months from the date of the beginning of such period. Here, petitioner was appointed as of September 9, 1959 and thus the one year probationary period continued until September 8, 1960. Under the circumstances, the resolution terminating petitioner’s services as of September 8, 1960, was within the probationary period of one year and was proper and timely (see *Matter of MacDonald*V. *Bryan,*18 A D 2d 691). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [32 Misc 2d 983.]
Searched for **http://www.abilityone.gov/procurement_list/index.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.abilityone.gov/procurement_list/index.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,070,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               92,035,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,094,000
<INVENTORY>                                119,784,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           215,938,000
<PP&E>                                     106,723,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              34,806,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             323,750,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      183,611,000
<BONDS>                                    104,665,000
<COMMON>                                        47,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,717,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               323,750,000
<SALES>                                    452,487,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           452,487,000
<CGS>                                      386,656,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              386,656,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,517,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,627,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   562,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,065,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,065,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

**Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Leonard F. Leganza, the Chief Executive Officer of The Eastern Company (the “Company”) and John L. Sullivan III, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

| 1) | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period ended March 29, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 30th day of April, 2008.

 

|   | /s/ Leonard F. Leganza    |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Leonard F. Leganza

CEO   |
|   |                      |
|   | /s/ John L. Sullivan III  |
|   | John L. Sullivan III

CFO |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Eastern Company and will be retained by The Eastern Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
§ 872.30 How does OSM distribute and award prior balance replacement funds? ( a ) We distribute prior balance replacement funds to you as follows: ( 1 ) In an amount equal to the aggregate, unappropriated amount allocated to you before October 1, 2007, under sections 402(g)(1)(A) or (B) of SMCRA;
( 2 ) If you are, or are not, certified under section 411(a) of SMCRA; and
( 3 ) Subject to § 872.35, in seven equal annual installments beginning with the 2008 Federal fiscal year which starts on October 1, 2007.
( b ) We award these funds to you in grants according to the provisions of part 885 of this chapter for certified States and Indian tribes or part 886 of this chapter for uncertified States and Indian tribes.
( c ) At the same time we distribute prior balance replacement funds to you under this section, we transfer the same amount to historic coal funds from moneys in your State or Tribal share of the Fund that were allocated to you before October 1, 2007. The transferred funds will be available for annual grants under § 872.21 for the Federal fiscal year beginning October 1, 2035, and annually thereafter. We will allocate, distribute, and award the transferred funds according to the provisions of §§ 872.21, 872.22, and 872.23.
[73 FR 67634, Nov. 14, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 2346, Jan. 14, 2022]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3439

___________

David Lee Daniels, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Sheriff Keith Ferguson, in both his *

individual and official capacities; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Corporal Jessen, in both his *

individual and official capacities; *

Corporal McAlester, in both his *

individual and official capacities; *

Officer Carson Lee, in both his *

individual and official capacities, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 7, 2009

Filed: April 13, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

-2-

Arkansas inmate David Lee Daniels appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant

of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Daniels alleged that, while he

was a pretrial detainee under defendants’ custody, he became ill and fell because

Officer Lee gave him the wrong medication, and that thereafter he was deprived of

food for two days, and deprived of medical care.

Upon careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th

Cir. 2006), we reject Daniels’s arguments on appeal: (1) the district court considered

Daniels’s untimely objections to the magistrate judge’s report and conducted de novo

review, after which the court was entitled to dismiss the case based on the report, see

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); (2) the undisputed evidence shows that at most, Lee acted

negligently in dispensing the medication, see Alberson v. Norris, 458 F.3d 762, 765

(8th Cir. 2006) (even gross negligence is insufficient for Eighth Amendment claim),

and Daniels’s contention that Lee acted maliciously contradicts his earlier attestation

that Lee acted inadvertently, cf. Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire Corp., 719 F.2d

1361, 1365-66 (8th Cir. 1983) (party cannot create trialworthy issue by filing affidavit

contradicting earlier testimony unless contradiction is adequately explained); and (3)

defendants’ unrebutted evidence shows that after the fall, they contacted a jail nurse

and placed Daniels under observation pursuant to her instructions, and there is no

evidence that any named defendant was involved thereafter in the alleged deprivation

of food or medical care, see Martin v. Sargent, 780 F.3d 1334, 1338 (8th Cir. 1985).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny

Daniels’s appellate motions.

______________________________
§ 56.14214 Train warnings. A warning that is audible above the surrounding noise level shall be sounded— ( a ) Immediately prior to moving trains;
( b ) When trains approach persons, crossings, other trains on adjacent tracks; and
( c ) Any place where the train operator's vision is obscured.
#### CASTAGNETTE, Respondent, v. NICCHIA, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by Marie Castagnette against Charles Nicchia.

No opinion. Motion denied.
***EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

       In connection with the annual reportof CNB Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W. JenningsDuncan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the CNB Corporation, certifyto the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

| 1. | The  above-listed Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2. | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-K fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |

| Date:  March  14, 2008 | /s/W. Jennings Duncan                     W. Jennings Duncan  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
#### § 1909.4 Suggestions and complaints.

The CIA welcomes suggestions, comments, or complaints with regard to its administration of the historical access provisions of Executive Order 13526. Members of the public shall address all such communications to the CIA Information and Privacy Coordinator. The CIA will respond as determined feasible and appropriate under the circumstances.
### Docket No. FAA - 2016 - 3983 Dir ID 2015 - NM - 009 - AD

**Contacts.** 

### With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

O rgan i z at i on P ers on C onta cted **D ate**  Re s pon s e **N at** **i o**  **n a**  **l B**  **u s**  **ine s**  **s Aircr**  **af t**  **A ss**  **o ci**  **at i**  **on E**  **li C**  **ott i**  1 /21 / 15 **Re g**  **i o**  **n a**  **l Airline**  **A ss**  **o ci**  **at i**  **o n**  1 /21 / 1 5 **Aircr af**  **t O**  **w ners**  **& P**  **il ot**  **s A**  **s s**  **o ci**  **at i**  **o n**  **R o**  **bert Ha**  **ck m**  **a n**  1 /21 / 15 **Airlines fo**  **r A**  **m erica**  **R o**  **bert I**  **rel a**  **nd** 1 /21 / 15
# C_2023274EN.01000501.xml

| 3.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/5

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
  )

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 274/05)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2023) 5044 | 1 August 2023 | 4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (‘4-tert-OPnEO’)
  EC No.-; CAS No.- | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, Emil-von-Behring-Str.76., 35041 Marburg, Germany | REACH/23/12/0 | In isolation of protein from recombinant cell cultures for the production of IVD kits (protein cell extraction) | 4 January 2030 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |
| REACH/23/12/1 | In formulation of IVD kit reagents | 4 January 2033 |
| REACH/23/12/2 | In formulation of IVD-wash solutions | 4 January 2033 |
| REACH/23/12/3 | In IVD-kit reagents on diagnostic analyser systems | 4 January 2033 |
| REACH/23/12/4 | In IVD-wash solutions on diagnostic analyser systems | 4 January 2033 |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2023) 5044

1 August 2023

4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (‘4-tert-OPnEO’)

EC No.-; CAS No.-

Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, Emil-von-Behring-Str.76., 35041 Marburg, Germany

REACH/23/12/0

In isolation of protein from recombinant cell cultures for the production of IVD kits (protein cell extraction)

4 January 2030

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

REACH/23/12/1

In formulation of IVD kit reagents

4 January 2033

REACH/23/12/2

In formulation of IVD-wash solutions

4 January 2033

REACH/23/12/3

In IVD-kit reagents on diagnostic analyser systems

4 January 2033

REACH/23/12/4

In IVD-wash solutions on diagnostic analyser systems

4 January 2033

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9946 

To authorize the appropriation of $8,000,000,000 for disaster loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2024 

Mr. MOSKOWITZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To authorize the appropriation of $8,000,000,000 for 

disaster loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 7(B) DISASTER LOAN AUTHORIZATION OF AP4 PROPRIATIONS. 

5 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Small 

6 Business Administration $8,000,000,000 to make loans 

7 under section 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

8 636(b)). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### § 151.2 Applicability.

This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments (including the Coast Guard at all times, including when it is a Service in the Department of Homeland Security by agreement with that Department), the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the DoD.
Wyoming Sage-Grouse
< Land Use Plan Amendments
Hulett
f Map 3-19: Greater Sage-grouse

feROOK Seasonal Habitat

LUP Amendments Planning Area
(J Bim Field office Boundary

[] Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary
@G Regional Winter Habitat

Regional Nesting Habitat

Regional Summer Habitat

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

[ Counties
Water
Interstate
— State / US Hwy
° Cities
“A Guernsey
Pg Fort Lajamie
Ae |
i | _ Torgpaton
eatand GOSHEN NI
| Yoder
°
|
hugwater
4 0 25 50 100
———
Miles
LARAMIE 0 25 50 100
Laramie | Sees
E Kilometers

ow Pear

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF
THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.
# C_2011204EN.01002901.xml

| 9.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/29

---

Order of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Van Rossum v Council and Commission

(Case T-207/96) (1)

1

2011/C 204/52

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 8.3.1997.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, H. R. Brown, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 15, 2004