alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 159.2 Applicability and scope. This part: ( a ) Applies to: ( 1 ) The Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense (DoD), the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities in the DoD (hereafter referred to as the “DoD Components”).
( 2 ) The Department of State and other U.S. Federal agencies insofar as it implements the requirements of section 862 of Public Law 110-181, as amended. Specifically, in areas of operations which require enhanced coordination of PSC and PSC personnel working for U.S. Government (U.S.G.) agencies, the Secretary of Defense may designate such areas as areas of combat operations or other significant military operations for the limited purposes of this part. In such an instance, the standards established in accordance with this part would, in coordination with the Secretary of State, expand from covering only DoD PSCs and PSC personnel to cover all U.S.G.-funded PSCs and PSC personnel operating in the designated area.
( 3 ) The requirements of this part shall not apply to a nonprofit nongovernmental organization receiving grants or cooperative agreements for activities conducted within an area of other significant military operations if the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State agree that such organization may be exempted. An exemption may be granted by the agreement of the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State under this paragraph (a)(3) on an organization-by-organization or area-by-area basis. Such an exemption may not be granted with respect to an area of combat operations.
( b ) Prescribes policies applicable to all: ( 1 ) DoD PSCs and PSC personnel on contract and subcontract, at any tier, performing private security functions in support of contingency operations, humanitarian or peace operations, or other military operations or exercises outside the United States.
( 2 ) U.S.G.-funded PSCs and PSC personnel performing private security functions in an area of combat operations or, with the agreement of the Secretary of State, other significant military operations as designated by the Secretary of Defense.
[76 FR 49655, Aug. 11, 2011, as amended at 87 FR 55283, Sept. 9, 2022]
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2004-18CB
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-18CB


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                       Dated: March 29, 2005
------------------------


JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                  Dated: March 29, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT



                                      15
#### In the Matter of the Attorney-General *v.*The Atlantic Mutual Life Insurance Company. Same *v.*Same.

(Argued January 31, 1882;

decided February 10, 1882.)

*William Ba/rnes*for appellant.

*Nathcmiél G. Moak*for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeals; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeals dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jack C. BridgesJack C. BridgesExecutive Vice-PresidentNovember 13, 2007Date
§ 870.11 Applicability. The regulations in this part apply to all surface and underground coal mining operations except— ( a ) The extraction of coal by a landowner for his own noncommercial use from land owned or leased by him;
( b ) The extraction of coal as an incidental part of Federal, State, or local government-financed highway or other construction;
( c ) The extraction of coal incidental to the extraction of other minerals where coal does not exceed 162 ⁄ 3 percent of the total tonnage of coal and other minerals removed for commercial use or sale ( 1 ) In accordance with part 702 of this chapter for Federal program States and on Indian lands or
( 2 ) In any twelve consecutive months in a State with an approved State program until counterpart regulations pursuant to part 702 of this chapter have been incorporated into the State program and in accordance with such counterpart regulations, thereafter; and
( d ) The extraction of less than 250 tons of coal within twelve consecutive months.
[47 FR 28593, June 30, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 52123, Dec. 20, 1989; 54 FR 52123, Dec. 20, 1989; 73 FR 67631, Nov. 14, 2008]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 8, 2006

|MS Structured Asset Corp.                         
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

|Delaware                                        | 333-101155                | 13-4026700                        
|----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                                               
|(State or Other Jurisdiction  of Incorporation) | (Commission File  Number) | (IRS Employer  Identification No.)



|1585 Broadway, Second Floor  New York, New York  Attention: Madhu Philips | 10036     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------
|                                                                         
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                                  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

|Not Applicable                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)





---

Section 8Other Events



| | Item 8.01 | Other Events
| | --------- | ------------



Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS), AT&T Corp. Debenture Backed Series 2003-17 Trust (the Trust) (New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol HJD) has liquidated its assets and terminated. Settlement of a sale of the securities held by the Trust occurred on February 8, 2006, and a liquidation distribution was made with respect to the Units of the Trust on February 8, 2006.



In respect of the Class A Units, the amount of the distribution was $25.451 per Class A Unit, representing the full Unit Principal Balance of the Class A Units plus accrued interest in respect of the Class A Units through and excluding February 8, 2006.



In respect of the Class B Units, the amount of the distribution was $974.216 per $1,000 Initial Notional Amortizing Balance of Class B Units, representing the full Class B Present Value Amount as determined for value on February 8, 2006.







| |  | 
| |  | 





---











SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.



Date: February 14, 2006

MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.

(Registrant)

By: /s/ Madhu Philips

Name:    Madhu Philips
  Title:     Vice President





| |  | 
| |  | 





---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

85 FR 81999, December 17, 2020.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 

Monday, December 21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING: 

The Open Meeting scheduled for Monday, December 21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., has been cancelled.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 18, 2020.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-28521 Filed 12-21-20; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
### Part B—Classified Information
**Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

The undersigned officer of First National Lincoln Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act.In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: March 16, 2007

 

/s/ F. STEPHEN WARD

F. Stephen Ward

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011319EN.01001102.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/11

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2011 — Arch Chemicals and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T-400/04, T-402/04 to T-404/04) (1)

1

(Health policy - Placing on the market of biocidal products - Identification of active substances on the market - Decision refusing amendment of certain provisions of the legislation - Actions for failure to act - Obligation to act - Actions for annulment - Not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 319/20

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Arch Chemicals, Inc. (Norwalk, Connecticut, United States); Arch Timber Protection Ltd (Castleford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom) (Case T-400/04); Rhodia UK Ltd, formerly Rhodia Consumer Specialities Ltd (Watford, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom) (Case T-402/04); Sumitomo Chemical (UK) plc (London, United Kingdom) (Case T-403/04); Troy Chemical Co. BV (Vlaardingen, Netherlands) (Case T-404/04); (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis and D. Recchia, and subsequently by P. Oliver and G. Wilms, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action, firstly, seeking a declaration of the Commission’s failure to act in that it unlawfully refrained from amending certain provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1896/2000 of 7 September 2000 on the first phase of the programme referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on biocidal products (OJ 2000 L 228, p. 6) and of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2032/2003 of 4 November 2003 on the second phase of the 10-year work programme referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8 and amending Regulation (EC) No 1896/2000 (OJ 2003 L 307, p. 1) and, in the alternative, action for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 20 July 2004 refusing to grant the applicants’ requests and, secondly, action for compensation for the loss which the applicants suffered as a result of the Commission’s failure to act and, in the alternative, action for compensation for the loss caused by the Commission’s letter of 20 July 2004.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders Arch Chemicals, Inc., Arch Timber Protection Ltd, Rhodia UK Ltd, Sumitomo Chemical (UK) plc and Troy Chemical Co. BV to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Arch Chemicals, Inc., Arch Timber Protection Ltd, Rhodia UK Ltd, Sumitomo Chemical (UK) plc and Troy Chemical Co. BV to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 22.1.2005.

1

---
### §493. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter, and when so specified in an appropriation Act such amounts shall remain available until expended.

(Mar. 30, 1949, ch. 41, §3, 63 Stat. 18.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                            16,752
<SECURITIES>                                      3,019
<RECEIVABLES>                                     26,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,504
<INVENTORY>                                       207,228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  258,554
<PP&E>                                            157,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                    66,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    397,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             144,581
<BONDS>                                           167,856
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          122
<OTHER-SE>                                        66,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      397,904
<SALES>                                           1,292,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,292,090
<CGS>                                             1,050,208
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,050,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                18,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (12,140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (12,140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   1,117
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (11,023)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.98)


</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<CIK>                                   0000764586
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  496565
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0
<PP&E>                                  13705687
<DEPRECIATION>                          6872774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          7396927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            7296927
<SALES>                                 2610080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2624488
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         856991
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     856991
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            856991
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        

</TABLE>
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES
NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ
DORI CONTRERAS GARZA
GINA M. BENAVIDES
GREGORY T. PERKES
NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK
DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR
CORPUS CHR ISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION BLDG. 100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9
956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

Sep tember 14, 2015

Hon. Blake A. Hawthorne Supreme Court of Texas
201 W. 14 th Street, Room 104
Austin TX 78701

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00415

- CV
Tr.Ct.No. D

- 1

- GN

- 12

- 003937 Style: TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY v. TEXAS FARM

BUREAU, FRANK VOLLEMAN, F RANK DESTEFANO, DAVID AND MARY BALLEW, RON AND SHERIE BURNETTE, SAM JONES, THEODORE AND MARY KALLUS, GLEN MARECEK, JOHN GAULDING, AND CHARLES AND
KATHERINE HARLESS

Dear Mr. Hawthorne :

Pursuant to your office’s request, enclosed herewith please find the documents
indicated on the attached docket sheet which was filed in the above referenced cause. The record is being sent electronically.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

cc: Hon. Charles Walker Bailey Hon. Priscilla M. Hubenak (DELIV ERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Dolores A. Hibbs (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
Hon. Kristofer S. Monson Hon. Douglas G. Caroom (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Cynthia Woelk (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
#### Barbara Birt, Appellant, v David R. Ratka, Jr., et al., Respondents.

[835 NYS2d 781]-

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Paula L. Feroleto, J), entered June 22, 2006 in an action seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant. The order denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

*1239Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant prohibiting defendants from subdividing property that had a right-of-way over plaintiff’s property. In their answer, defendants asserted a counterclaim seeking to extinguish the restrictive covenant. The restrictive covenant is contained in the deed to defendants’ property, and it had been contained in all deeds in defendants’ chain of title since the property was sold by plaintiffs parents in 1978. Both lots were originally part of premises owned by plaintiff’s parents, and plaintiff subsequently obtained title to her property by executor’s deed.

Contrary to the contention of plaintiff, Supreme Court properly denied her motion for summary judgment on the complaint as well as summary judgment dismissing the affirmative defenses and counterclaim. Although plaintiff met her initial burden with respect to the existence of the restrictive covenant, she failed to address the merits of the affirmative defenses or the counterclaim. “Pursuant to RPAPL 1951 (1), a restrictive covenant shall not be enforced if, at the time enforceability of the restriction is brought into question, it appears that ‘the restriction is of no actual and substantial benefit to the persons seeking its enforcement or seeking a declaration or determination of its enforceability, either because the purpose of the restriction has already been accomplished or, by reason of changed conditions or other cause, its purpose is not capable of accomplishment, or for any other reason.’ The party claiming that a restriction is unenforceable bears the burden of proving it” *(New York City Economic Dev. Corp. v T.C. Foods Import & Export Co., Inc.,*19 AD3d 568, 569 [2005]; *see Chambers v Old Stone Hill Rd. Assoc.,*1 NY3d 424, 433-434 [2004]; *Orange & Rockland Util. v Philwold Estates,*52 NY2d 253, 266 [1981]). While defendants ordinarily would bear that burden, here plaintiff moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing “[defendants’ defenses and counterclaim[ ].” We thus conclude that plaintiff assumed the burden of proving that the restrictive covenant is enforceable pursuant to RPAPL 1951 (1). Plaintiff failed to meet that burden by failing to establish as a matter of law that the restrictive covenant is of any actual or substantial benefit to her *(cf. Smith v Sheppard,*301 AD2d 913, 915 [2003]). Present—Gorski, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ.