P.1 

OAR Box 1500 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

62) ll-C-88 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/5/2008 1:51:29 PM Sheet 62 of 343 
P.2 

Date sent: 

From: 

To: 

Copies to: 

Subject: 

A9«52 

ll-C-£* 

Wed, 18 Mar 1998 13:21:40 -0500 

MADELEINE STRUM < STRUM.MADELEINE@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV > 

robhab@erols.com 

MEYER.JAN@EPAMAiL.EPA.GOV,stevemcn@erols.com, jschwtzr@gte.net, 

mproctor@rtp.pes.com 

update to the MACT data base for open molding 

Per your request for periodic updates of the MACT data base, attached are three excel files that contain the updated 

MACT data base for open molding. These are: om.xis (corrosion and non corrosion mechanical and manual), fil.xls 

(corrosion and non corrosion filament winding) and gel.xis (gel coat). The MACT floor for these process groupings 

was determined by calculating an emission ratio using our latest MACT models ofthe form AxAb (as seen by the 

formulas used in the spreadsheet). These were the same models we discussed in December 97/January 98. 

Presently, we are using a model (see formulas in the spreadsheets) to estimate the effectiveness of vapor 

suppressed resins for unfilled systems. For filled systems, we did not apply any emission reduction for the use of 

vapor suppressants. 

While we have incorporated some explanatory notes on the spreadsheets, they are not meant to be completely 

self-explanatory. Let me know if you have any questions. 

Melanie Proctor „ 1 _ Wed, 18 Mar 1998 15:30:48 
Corrosion - Resistant Filament Winding DFtAFT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\fil.xls 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific facility. 

A facility's specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facility's actual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has information. Other facilities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

MACT Model 

MACT Model Emissions 

Emissions per Ton Resin 

Filler (before MACT) (before MACT) Reduction 

Rank Plant Name 

Velasco Scale Co. (Plastics Div.) 

(ley) flfiyii 

nd 1.5 

nd 1.0 

Belding Tank Technology (F.K.A. D & R Fabrication, Inc.) 0.0 6.6 

Brldgewater Protective Coatings nd 0.7 

nd 6.6 

nd 5.8 

0.0 7.1 

Industrial Fiberglass Specialties, Inc. nd 1.4 

(lbs/ton) Techniques 

129.9 

154.4 

164.5 

164.5 

Xenon Co., Inc. 2.5 164.5 

10 Beetle Plastics, Inc. 0.0 14.7: 165.5 

C ^ 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

Raven Industries, Inc. (Sioux Falls) 0.0 1.8 

ABC Industries, Inc. (Grand Junction, CO) 3.2 

ABC Industries, Inc. (Wallace, ID) 2.7 

ABC Industries, Inc. (Winona Lake, IN) 4.0 

Ameron, Inc. (Burkburnett) 0.0 0.2 

Appalachian Plastics, Inc. 10.0 9.0 

Ershigs, Inc. (Wilson) 

Fowler Manufacturing, Inc. 

0.0 7.7 

0.0 7.7 

0.0 7.7 

International Paper (Hampton, SC) nd 7.7 

Owens-Corning (Aubumdale) 0.0 7.7 

Owens-Corning (Mount Union) 0.0 7.7 

Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Conroe) 0.0 7.7 

Owens-Coming Tanks (Valparaiso) 0.0 7.7 

Red Ewald, Inc. 0.0 26.5 

168.1 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

Rubber & Plastic Applicators 0.0 13.1 

Simon-Telelect Inc. 0.0 5.8 

Smith Fiberglass Products, Inc. (Little Rock) 0.0 7.7 

Smith Fiberglass Products, Inc. (Wichita) 0.0 7.7 

Xerxes Corp- (Anaheim) 0.0 7.7 

Xerxes Corp- (Avon) 0.0 7.7 

Nova Group, Inc. 4.7 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

179.9 

180.5 

33 International Reinforced Plastics nd 1.5 185.0 
Corrosion - Resistant Filament Winding DRAFT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\fil.xls 

" 

" 

' r— 

--; 

—y 

• — 

"" 

& 

M 

'¥:• 

Rank 

34 

* 35 

• 36 

37 

38 

39 

' 40 

- 41 

42 

Important Notes: I 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific facility. 

A facilit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facilit/s actual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has information. 

Plant Name 

GPI CorpSpecialty Plastics, Inc. 

Ershigs, Inc. (Bellingham) 

Ecowater Systems 

Hastings Group, Inc.-Viatec (Belding) 

MFG Justin Tanks, Inc. 

Diamond Fiberglass Fabricators, Inc. 

Owens-Coming Fiberglas (Bakersfield) 

FibSrcast Co. 

~-

"**" Projected Total (including assumed values): 

** Average: 

-*3 ' 

(.eqend 

Assumed values - no data provided 

Resin 

(tPY) 

131.5 

35.0 

153.0 

122.0 

178.0 

103.0 

254.0 

86.0 

83.0 

3589 

85.4 

^'i1Hp3]|^ ^ 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

nd*^ No Data H 

y = Yes (Filler is used in unknown Quantities) 

Other facilities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus 

46.0 

47.0 

47.6 

48.0 

48.5 

48.9 

49.0 

50.0 

52.0 

44.6 

Filler 

Itey) 

0.0 

nd 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

8.6 

1.0 

25 

0.8 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

am 

12.2 

3.3 

14.8 

11.9 

17.6! 

10.3 

25.5 

8.9 

9.0 

327.0 

7.8 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Resin 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton) 

185.1 

190.4 

193.5 

195.6 

198.3 

200.4 

200.9 

206.3 

217.0 

Reduction 

Techniques 

( V \ 
Noncorrosion - Resistant Filament Winding DRAFT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\fil.xls 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to detemnine or estimate actual emissions at a specific facility. 

A facilit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facility's actual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has information. Other facilities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

MACT Model 

MACT Model Emissions 

Weighted Emissions per Ton Resin 

Resin Average % HAP Filler (before MACT) (before MACT) Reduction 

Rank Plant Name 

Shakespeare Co. 

_0Eyl 

739.4 

in neat resin plus 

33.0 

Ooyj (lay) (lbs/ton) Techniques 

0 

73.9 

2.3 

44.5 

Projected Total (including assumed values): 46.8 

Legend 

Assumed values - no data provided 

m 
Gel Coating DRAFT 

3\17\98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\ael.xls 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s actual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Production Tooling Production & Tooling 

Weighted Weighted 

Average Average MACT Model 

% HAP in Specific lbs of HAP Gel % HAP in MACT Model Emissions 

Gel Coat Neat Gel Gravity per gallon Coat Neat Gel Emissions per Ton Gel Coat 

Usage Coat plus of Gel of gel coat Coat plus (before MACT) (before MACT) Reduction 

Rank Plant Name iimi m 

Coat (Ibs/aau (ley) m 

(tpyi (lbs/ton) Technique 

A. R. E., Inc. (Massillon) 1541.2 39.3 0.3 48.0 16.1 21 Oxidizer (95% Control) 

Cor Tec Co 4.2 24 Oxidizer (91% Control) 

1.4 4.2 16.2 

1.4 2.9 3.7 

1.4 2.9 2.0 47.2 75.0 

5.3 

Fiber Pro (formerly Great Dane Trailers Indiana, Inc.) 105.0 30.0 13.3 

36 Oxidizer (90% Control) 

170 

171 

253 

253 

Fiber-Tech Industries, Inc. 327.4 30.0 41.4 253 

Marble Products Co. 30.0 30.0 3.8 253 

.10 Miles Fiberglass & Plastics, Inc. 12.1 30.0 1.5 253 

11 Sunrise Fiberglass Corp. 18.4 30.0 2.3 253 

12 U.S. Fiberglass Products, Inc. 23.5 30.0 1.2 3.1 3.0 253 

13 Western Recreational Vehicles, Inc. 17.0 30.0 2.2 253 

14 

16 

17 

Bowie Manufacturing, Inc. 

Bolting Brothers Marble, Inc. 

9.3 30.6 1.2 

79.4 31.2 1.3 3.5 2.1 47.2 

20.0 32.0 

Oxford CMP, Inc. 17.0 32.0 

11.4 

2.9 

2.4 

263 

281 

286 

18 

20 

Plas-Tech, Ltd. 

Fiberglass Industries, Inc. 

5.0 32.0 0.7 

65.1 32.3 1.3 3.6 0.3 46.5 9.5 

15.0 32.6 1.2 3.3 2.2 

286 

292 

296 

21 

22 

24 

Evelands, Inc. 

Michiana Fiberglass, Inc. 

•i 

Olympic Fiberglass Industries, Inc. 

25 LASCO Bathware (South Boston) 

27 LASCO Bathware (Elizabethtown) 

11.0 

87.6 

69.6 

87.6 

466.0 

33.0 1.7 

33.0 13.2 

33.6 1.3 3.6 10.9 

34.0 14.0 

170.4 

499.0 

40.0 75.7 

34.2 1.3 3.7 2.6 44.7 28.2 

40.0 82.2 

302 

302 

313 

320 

325 Oxidizer (25% Control) 

326 

329 Oxidizer (24% Control) 

28 20th Century Fiberglass, Inc. (Plant Four) 15.0 35.0 2.5 338 

29 A-1 Fiberglass, Inc. 95.0 35.0 16.0 338 

30 Aero Transportation Products 93.0 35.0 15.7 338 

31 Altec Industries, Inc. (Midwest Oper.) 25.0 35.0 4.2 338 
Gel Coating DRAFT 

3\17\98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\ael.xls 

' 

Rank 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

60 

61 

62 

Important Notes: I I 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a spedfic fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlity's actual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Americh Corp- (Charlotte, NC) 

Americh Corp. (Hollywood, CA) 

Arrow Dynamics, Inc. 

Attbar Plastics, Inc. 

Builders Marble, Inc. 

C & K Fiberglass Plastics, Inc. 

Century Manufacturing Co. 

Century Marble Co., Inc. 

Charloma Fiberglass, Inc. 

Covermaster, Inc. 

Ershigs, Inc. (Bellingham) 

Ershigs, Inc. (Wilson) 

Fiberdome, Inc. (Plant #1) 

Glasspec Associates, Ltd. 

Great Lakes Plastics Corp. 

HEMCO CorpHoliday Rambler Corp., Plant 36 and 37 

Kivett's, Inc. 

Krueger International, Inc. 

LaValley Construction Co. (Biioxi) 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^8 Lawrence Wittman & Co., Inc. 

Leer East, Inc. 

Leer Midwest 

McClarin Plastics, Inc. 

Melcher Manufacturing Co., Inc. 

Molded Plastic Industries, Inc. 

Murphy Body Co. 

Osborne Industries, Inc. 

Peterson Products 

Phil Carter System, Inc. 

Production 

Gel Coat 

Usage 

OBVJ 

3.5 

3.0 

10.0 

79.0 

9.0 

43.0 

25.5 

87.6 

86.0 

70.0 

3.5 

5.6 

30.0 

7.5 

80.0 

9.0 

150.0 

4.5 

61.7 

4.9 

4.4 

3.3 

87.6 

200.0 

87.6 

14.0 

49.0 

17.2 

12.0 

7.5 

9.0 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

(%) 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

tlllllllll l 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

Specific 

Gravity 

of Gel 

Coat 

1.2 

1.2 

1.1 

lbs of HAP 

per gallon 

of gel coat 

(IbS/qal) 

3.5 

3.5 

3.2 

Tooling 

Gel 

Coat 

Usage 

(Ml 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

m 

Production & Tooling 

I 

MACT Model 

; Emissions 

(before MACT) 

(toy) 

0.6 

0.5 

1.7 

13.3 

15 

7.3 

4.3 

14.8 

14.5 

11.8 

0.6 

0.9 

5.1 

1.3 

13.5 

1.5 

25.3 

0.8 

10.4 

0.8 

0.7 

0.5 

14.8 

, 33.8 

14.8 

2.4 

8.3 

2.9 

2.0 

1.3 

1.5 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Gel Coat 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton) 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

Reduction 

Technique 

••.^.^• l 
Gel Coating DRAFT 

3\17\98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\oel.xls 

i 

.* 

s> 

2 

'. 

> 

Ji 

a 

« 

•

:

i 

• 

Rank 

63 

. 64 

* 65 

* 6 6 

?-67. 

^68 . 

%69 

Kf70 

-71 

-•72/ 

-73 . 

. 74 

; 7 5 

76 • 

77 

78 

79 

80 

81 

82 

83 

84 

85 

86 

87 

88 

89 

90 

91 

92 

93 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s actual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

u Plant Name 

Picken's Plastics, Inc. 

Piedmont Fiberglass, Inc. 

Plastic Development Co. 

Retterbush Injection Molded Fiberglass Corp. 

Robroy Industries, Inc. (Belding, Ml) 

Seal Reinforced Fiberglass 

Simon-Telelect, Inc. 

Standard.Glas, Inc. 

Style Crest Products 

Tom Smith Fiberglass, Inc. 

Trail Wagons, Inc. 

Universal Plastics, Inc. 

Universal Rundle Corp. (Union Point) 

Universal-Rundle Corp. (New Castle) 

William Kreysler & Associates, Inc. 

Xenon Co., Inc. 

LASCO Bathware (Lancaster) 

Nordic Fiberglass, Inc. (Devils Lake) 

Raven Industries, Inc. (Sioux Falls) 

Nordic Fiberglass, Inc. (Warren) 

^^^^^^^^^t^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ l 

Bathcraft, Inc. 

H & R Industries, Inc. 

Eckler Industries 

l-W.ln e 

Eljer Manufacturing (Valdosta) 

Fiberglass & Plastic Fab., Inc. 

Florida Line of Astatula, Inc. 

Hy-Tec Fiberglass, Inc. 

Kreider Manufacturing, Inc. 

I I 

Produdion 

Gel Coat 

Usage 

OSmO. 

45.0 

22.2 

1.0 

3.2 

3.6 

3.3 

24.0 

15.0 

35.0 

8.1 

8.0 

46.6 

300.0 

607.5 

6.5 

0.8 

328.0 

23.8 

12.9 

13.6 

448.1 

123.5 

383.2 

5.0 

10.8 

60.0 

93.0 

9.0 

50.1 

6.0 

102.0 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

(%) 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

40.0 

35.2 

35.2 

35.5 

35.6 

35.7 

35.7 

35.9 

35.7 

IIIIIIIB 36.0 

36.0 

36.0 

36.0 

36.0 

Specific 

Gravity 

of Gel 

Coat 

1.3 

1.3 

1.2 

1.3 

1.3 

lbs of HAP 

per gallon 

of gel coat 

(Ibs/qali 

3.7 

3.7 

3.6 

3.9 

3.9 

Tooling 

Gel 

Coat 

Usage 

flBVJ 

1.1 

1 3 

0.2 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

m 

39.9 

46.0 

42.0 

Production & Tooling 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

te) 

7.6 

3.7 

0.2 

0.5 

0.6 

0.6 

4.1 

2.5 

5.9 

1.4 

, 1-4 

7.9 

50.6 

102.6 

1.1 

0.1 

55.4 

4.1 

2.2 

2.4 

78.4 

21.6 

67.4 

0.9 

1.9 

10.6 

16.5 

1.6 

8.9 

1.1 

18.2 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Gel Coat 

(before MACT) 

ribs/ton) 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

338 

341 

341 

347 

349 

350 

350 

353 

353 

354 

356 

356 

356 

356 

356 

Reduction 

Technique 

. 

.. 

**. _ 

^ 

... 

.... 

•»*. 

j _ . 

—. 

_. 

Oxidizer (22% Control) 

.^HMH 
Gel Coating DRAFT 

3\17\98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\ael.xls 

Important Notes: I The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a specific facility. 

A fadlity's specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlity's adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Production Tooling Produdion & Tooling 

Weighted Weighted 

Average Average MACT Model 

% HAP in Spedfic lbs of HAP Gel % HAP in MACT Model Emissions 

Gel Coat Neat Gel Gravity per gallon Coat Neat Gel Emissions per Ton Gel Coat 

Usage Coat plus of Gel of gel coat Usage Coat plus (before MACT) (before MACT) Redudion 

Rank Plant Name te) (%) Coat (lbs/gal) te) m te) (lbs/ton) Technique 

94 Newport Laminates 30.0 36.0 5.3 356 

95 Northwest Bodies, Inc. 22.6 36.0 4.0 356 

96 Oasis Industries, Inc. 16.2 36.0 2.9 356 

97 Vertex Plastics, Inc. 15.0 36.0 2.7 356 

98 Pearl Baths, Inc. 4.5 36.2 0.8 360 

99 Arrowhead Plastic Engineering, Inc. 28.9 36.6 5.3 367 

100 Sunset Plastics, Inc. 50.0 36.6 9.2 367 

102 Eljer Plumbingware (Wilson) 

103 Accurate Glass, Inc. 

53.5 

87.6 

37.0 

36.6 1.3 3.9 9.8 368 

36.8 1.2 3.7 16.2 371 

37.0 6.9 375 

104 Fibre Body Industries, Inc. 70.0 37.0 13.1 375 tf 

105 Monarch Plastic, Inc. 13.8 37.0 2.6 375 

106 

108 

National Fiber Glass Produds, Inc. 

Plasti-Fab, Inc. 

167.3 

20.5 

37.0 

37.4 

31.3 375 

1.9 375 

3.9 382 

109 ACME Reinforced Plastics, Inc. 21.0 37.5 4.0 384 

110 Aqua Glass Corp- (Adamsville) 

111 Blue Dolphin Fiberglass Pools 

112 Epoch Industries 

1170.0 

87.6 

12.0 

37.5 224.7 384 

37.5 16.8 384 

37.5 2.3 384 

113 Tiffany Marble Manufaduring, Inc. 8.5 37.5 1.6 384 

114 Appalachian Plastics, Inc. 2.0 37.5 0.4 385 

115 Associated Plastics, Inc. 12.5 37.5 2.4 385 

116 Fleetwood (Fontana - Formerly Gold Shield) 158.0 37.5 30.4 385 

117 Images Produds Corp. 30.0 37.5 5.8 385 

118 A. R. E., Inc. (Mount Eaton) 261.6 38.0 1.3 4.1 51.5 394 

119 Eagle Craft, Inc. 20.0 38.0 3.9 394 

32.9 394 

122 

123 

S. R. Smith, Inc. 

Country Coach, Inc. 

593.0 

87.6 

30.8 

38.0 

38.3 

116.8 394 

1.3 4.0 

1.3 

0.4 

48.0 17.6 396 

47.0 6.3 403 

124 Beaver Motor Coaches 0.5 38.5 0.1 404 
Gel Coating DRAFT 

3\17\98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\ael.xls 

>, 

iH 

.£ 

'Jt 

'•': 

i 

/• 

.& 

•a 

-J 

v! 

• 

Rank 

125 

126 

127 

128 

si 29 

^130 

»131 

2132 

*13 3 

•'•si 34 

-13 5 

-13 6 

137 

138 

139 

140 

141 

142 

143 

144 

145 

146 

147 

148 

149 

150 

151 

152 

153 

154 

155 

Important Notes: | | 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to detennine or estimate actual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s actual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has infonnation. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

KBK Industries, Inc. 

LASCO Bathware (Moapa) 

Fiber Pad, Inc. 

American Bluegrass Marble Co., Inc. 

Aqua Glass (Klamath Falls) 

Belding Tank Technology (F.K.A. D & R Fabrication, Inc.) 

Custom Marble, Inc. 

Diamond.Fiberglass Fabricators, Inc. 

E-T-M Enterprises, Inc. 

ED Industries Inc. (Sportsman Pickup Covers) 

General Marble Co. (Guasti) 

General Marble Co. (Hornell) 

General Marble Co. (Lincolnton) 

Glasstite, Inc. 

Hood Manufaduring, Inc. 

International Paper (Hampton, SC) 

Jason Industries, Inc. (Elkhart, IN) 

Miracle Recreation Co. 

Odom Fiberglass, Inc. 

Plastic Composites Corp. 

S.W.C. Industries, Inc. (Swirl-Way Div.) 

United Technologies Motor Systems 

Vendura Industries, Inc. 

Xerxes Corp. (Seguin) 

Xerxes Corp. (Williamsport) 

Space Tables, Inc. 

^^m^/^^^^mm^mm^^^^^^^Mi 

GHM, Inc. 

Accra Industries, Inc. 

Acme Fiberglass, Inc. 

Alliance Equipment Co. 

Production 

Gel Coat 

Usage 

tei 

9.0 

1596.0 

20.0 

13.5 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

(%) 

38.5 

38.5 

38.8 

38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

14.0 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

20.0 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

1.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

87.6 38.9 

7.3 

249.9 

7.5 

5.0 

37.5 

87.6 

39.0 

39.3 

39.5 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

Specific 

Gravity 

of Gel 

Coat 

1.2 

lbs of HAP 

per gallon 

of gel coat 

(lbs/gal) 

4.0 

Tooling 

Gel 

Coat 

Usage 

tea 

3.2 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

<%) 

46.5 

Production & Tooling 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

te) 

1.8 

322.0 

4.1 

2.8 

18.0 

j 18.0 

j 2.9 

18.0 

| 18.0 

18.0 

18.0 

18.0 

18.0 

18.0 

4.1 

18.0 

18.0 

18.0 

0.3 

18.0 

18.0 

18.0 

18.0 

18.0 

18.0 

1.5 

53.2 

i 1.6 

1-1 

8.1 

19.0 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Gel Coat 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton) 

404 

404 

409 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

411 

413 

421 

423 

433 

433 

433 

Redudion 

Technique 

-

; 

<. 

j-

• , . 

., 

— 
Gel Coating DRAFT 

3\17\98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\ael.xls 

• 

Rank 

156 

157 

158 

159 

160 

161 

162 

163 

164 

165 

166 

167 

168 

169 

170 

171 

172 

173 

174 

175 

176 

177 

178 

179 

180 

181 

182 

183 

184 

185 

186 

Important Notes: I | 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a spedfic facility. 

A fadlit/s spedfic emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facilit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Amer,:anT&chftofogy4R,«)arciffnd..,Jnc 

Astoria Industries 

Athena Marble, Inc. 

Bittner Industries, Inc. 

Bradley Specialties Corp. 

Ceramic Cooling Tower Company 

Chance Operations, Inc. 

Comtech Antenna Systems, Inc. 

Continental Camper Company, Inc. 

Delta Fiberglass Structures, Inc. 

Diamond Coach Corp. 

Elmore Truck Accessories, Inc. 

Fiberglass Forms, Inc. 

Fiberglass Plus Recreational Industries, Inc. 

Fiberglass Produds, Inc. 

Fiberglass Specialties, Inc. 

Fiberglass Systems, Inc. 

Foreman Ind., Inc. 

G. W. Fiberglass, Inc. 

Gibbon Fiberglass Reprod., Inc. 

Glasgo Plastics, Inc. 

Grayson Tool Co. 

I. M. Penna, Inc. 

Kearney/Western Power Produds 

Kohler Co. 

Laminated Produds, Inc. 

Larson Co. 

LASCO Bathware (Anaheim) 

LASCO Bathware (Cordele) 

LASCO Bathware (Three Rivers) 

LASCO Bathware (Yelm) (aka Hytec Inc.) 

Produdion 

Gel Coat 

Usage 

tea 

3.9 

4.0 

7.4 

3.0 

1.7 

17.6 

22.8 

27.0 

72.5 

23.0 

24.0 

7.0 

8.0 

12.5 

30.0 

20.0 

158.6 

87.6 

113.7 

4.5 

87.6 

45.0 

7.3 

42.0 

10.0 

17.0 

0.6 

616.0 

405.0 

580.0 

525.0 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

{%) 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

Specific 

Gravity 

of Gel 

Coat 

lbs of HAP 

per gallon 

of gel coat 

(Ibs/aah 

Tooling 

Gel 

Coat 

Usage 

te) 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

1%) 

Produdion & Tooling 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

tel 

0.8 

0.9 

1.6 

0.7 

0.4 

3.8 

i 4.9 

5.9 

15.7 

5.0 

5.2 

1.5 

17 

2.7 

6.5 

4.3 

34.4 

19.0 

24.6 

1.0 

19.0 

9.8 

1.6 

9.1 

2.2 

3.7 

0.1 

133.5 

87.8 

125.7 

113.8 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Gel Coat 

(before MACT) 

i-lbs/ton} 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

433 

Redudion 

Technique 

^^•i^^ ^ 
Gel Coating DRAFT 

3\17\98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\ael.xls 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist 

Production Tooling Produdion & Tooling 

Weighted Weighted 

Average Average MACT Model 

% HAP in Specific lbs of HAP Gel % HAP in MACT Model Emissions 

Gel Coat Neat Gel Gravity per gallon Coat Neat Gel Emissions per Ton Gel Coat 

Usage Coat plus of Gel of gel coat Usage Coat plus (before MACT) (before MACT) Reduction 

Rgnk Plant Name te!) (%) Coat (Ibs/oal. te) m ite) "bs/tom Technique 

187 LL Cultured Marble 7.8 40.0 1.7 433 

188 Marley Cooling Tower Co. 110.0 40.0 23.8 433 

189 MFG - Molded Fiber Glass Co. (Adelanto) 46.0 40.0 10.0 433 

190 Newartesian Limited Partnership (Marble Plant) 135.0 40.0 29.3 433 

191 Niagara Fiberglass, Inc. 

192 Non Metallic Resources, Inc. 

193 Pacific Tank, Ltd. 

7.0 

87.6 

3.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

1.5 

19.0 

0.7 

433 

433 

433 

194 Prototype Concepts, Inc. 10.8 40.0 2.3 433 

195 Red Ewald, Inc. 11.0 40.0 2.4 433 

196 Syntechnics 140.0 40.0 30.3 433 

197 Teco, Inc. 4.0 40.0 0.9 433 

198 Treasure Coast Marble, Inc. 24.0 40.0 5.2 433 

199 Tri-City Marble, Inc. 12.0 40.0 2.6 433 

200 Venetian Marble (Helotes, TX) 14.1 40.0 3.1 433 

201 Warminster Fiberglass Co. (Jacksonville) 30.0 40.0 6.5 433 

202 Warminster Fiberglass Co. (Southampton) 37.3 40.0 8.1 433 

203 Wilson Marble Co. 7.8 40.0 1.7 433 

204 Yankee Plastic Co. 1.5 40.0 0.3 433 

205 Custom Fibreglass Manufaduring Co. 124.0 40.4 27.4 442 

206 American Reinforced Plastics 

208 GPICorp56.0 

87.6 

15.0 

40.5 

41.0 

12.4 

19.4 

3.4 

444 

444 

454 

209 Fleetwood (Decatur - Formerly Gold Shield) 673.7 41.4 155.7 462 

210 Bristol Fiberlite Industries 15.6 41.4 1.1 3.9 3.6 463 

211 Gorman-Rupp Co. 7.5 42.0 1.8 475 

212 Marbelite Corp. 20.0 43.0 5.0 496 

213 Marble Designs, Inc. 14.0 43.0 3.5 496 

Primero, Inc. 5.8 

0.3 

6.0 

2.4 

509 

518 

518 

529 
• 

Gel Coating 

* 

Rank 

218 

219 

220 

221 

222 

223 

224 

225 

226 

227 

228 

229 

230 

231 

232 

233 

234 

235 

236 

237 

238 

239 

240 

241 

242 

243 

244 

245 

246 

247 

248 

Important Notes: I 

\ 

DRAFT 

3\17\98 

o:\n801\dbase\new aer\ael.xls 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a specific facility. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facilit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Accent Marble Co., Inc. (Houston, TX) 

Austin Countertops, Inc. 

Brunnel Products of Florida, Inc. 

Cameo Marble 

Capital Marble Creations, Inc. 

Carolina Counters 

Central Marble Produds, Inc. 

Fiberglass Engineering Corp. 

Foremost Interiors, Inc. 

Gesmar Corp. 

Kerrico Corp. 

Lippert Corp. 

Schmitt Marble Produds 

Southeast Marble, Inc. 

United Panel, Inc. 

United States Marble, Inc. 

Gruber Systems, Inc. 

AGCO, Inc. 

Heritage Marble of Ohio, Inc. 

Marble Works, Inc. 

Nova Marble Produds 

Radiant Marble Co. 

Taylor Industries, Inc. 

American Slate and Marble of Hickory, Inc. 

St. Mary's Marble, L.L.C. 

Oasis 

Superior Home Produds 

MFG - Molded Fiber Glass Co. (Union City) 

American Marble Co., Inc. 

Amtech Corp. 

Capon Valley Marble, Inc. 

Produdion 

Gel Coat 

Usage 

ite ) 

5.9 

26.0 

27.5 

47.2 

15.0 

10.6 

9.0 

13.5 

5.9 

15.1 

26.0 

60.0 

50.0 

12.2 

22.0 

3.5 

18.0 

10.0 

14.0 

8.0 

13.0 

8.3 

13.0 

14.2 

9.5 

18.0 

39.0 

102.0 

87.6 

17.3 

11.0 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

m 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.5 

47.0 

47.0 

47.0 

47.0 

47.0 

47.0 

47.0 

47.9 

48.0 

48.0 

49.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

Specific 

Gravity 

of Gel 

Coat 

1.1 

1.0 

lbs of HAP 

per gallon 

of gel coat 

(Ibs/aah 

4.2 

4.1 

Tooling 

Gel 

Coat 

Usage 

te) 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

m 

Produdion & Tooling 

MACT Model 

; Emissions 

(before MACT) 

i te) 

1.6 

7.0 

7.4 

12.8 

4.1 

2.9 

2.4 

3.6 

1.6 

4.1 

7.0 

16.2 

13.5 

3.3 

5.9 

0.9 

5.0 

2.9 

4.1 

2.3 

3.8 

2.4 

3.8 

4.2 

2.9 

5.5 

11.9 

32.3 

28.8 

5.7 

3.6 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Gel Coat 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton) 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

540 

552 

586 

586 

586 

586 

586 

586 

587 

607 

610 

610 

634 

658 

658 

658 

Redudion 

Technique 

r* 
- • • 

Gei Coating 

Rank 

249 

250 

251 

252 

253 

254 

255 

256 

257 

258 

259 

260 

261 

Important Notes: I 1 I 

DRAFT 

3\17\98 

D:\n801\dbase\new aertael.xls 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Corinthian Marble (Polymer Casting, Inc.) 

Cultured Marble Produds, Ltd. 

International Marble, Inc. 

Marblecast Produds, Inc. 

Mincey Marble Manufaduring, Inc. 

Pinta's Cultured Marble, Inc. 

R & D Marble 

Rynone Manufaduring Corporation-Sayre Plant 

Synmar, Inc. 

Venetian Marble, Inc. (Richmond, VA) 

Roma Marble, Inc. 

Parthenon Marble Products Inc. 

Projected Total (includes assumed values): 

Average: 

Leqend 

Produdion 

Gel Coat 

Usage 

tea 

6.0 

8.0 

10.0 

87.6 

18.0 

10.0 

6.5 

50.0 

0.6 

10.5 

17.0 

6.5 

31.2 

22862.5 

87.6 

Production Year of S& Weeko per Year and S DaysjierVSteek A8|§||i|| 

Assumed values - no data provided 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

m 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

11111111111 50.0 

50.0 

52.5 

60.0 

38.9 

Specific 

Gravity 

of Gel 

Coat 

lbs of HAP 

per gallon 

of gel coat 

flbs/oal. 

Tooling 

Gel 

Coat 

Usage 

tea 

14.6 

1.3 

Weighted 

Average 

% HAP in 

Neat Gel 

Coat plus 

(%) 

45.7 

Produdion & Tooling 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

, te) 

2.0 

2.6 

3.3 

28.8 

5.9 

3.3 

2.1 

16.5 

0.2 

3.5 

5.6 

2.3 

14.4 

; 3905.5 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Gel Coat 

(before MACT) 

fibs/ton) 

658 

658 

658 

658 

658 

658 

658 

658 

658 

658 

658 

721 

925 

Redudion 

Techniaue 

. 

~ 

CV 
Corrosion - Resistant Manual Application DRAFT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlity's specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has infonnation. Other facilities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 
Corrosion - Resistant Manual Application DRAFT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to detennine or estimate adual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist 

MACT Model 

MACT Model Emissions 

Weighted Emissions per Ton Resin Process 

Resin Average % HAP Filler (before MACT) (before MACT) Redudion 

Rank Plant Name te) in neat resin plus tel te) (lbs/ton. Techniques 

34 

35 

Picken's Plastics, Inc. 

International Reinforced Plastics 

39 

49 

45.0 2.9 

46.0 nd 3.8 

149 

156 

36 Nova Group, Inc. 46.0 0.4 157 

37 Parkson Aeration & Fiberglas Corp., Inc. 46.3 nd 0.2 159 

38 New England Plastic Coated Produds, Inc. 46.7 nd 0.2 162 

39 

40 

42 

MFG Justin Tanks, Inc. 

Ashworth Plastic Produds 

Beden-Baugh Produds, Inc. 

53 

39 

79 

48.9 4.8 

10 

50.0 

56.9 

nd 3.7 

7.5 

nd 1.2 

180 

189 

189 *) 

252 

Projeded Total (induding assumed values): 1641.3 113.0 

Average: 39.1 43.3 

Legend: 

Assumed values - No data provided 

nd - No Data 

y = Yes (Filler is used in unknown Quantities) 
Corrosion - Resistant Mechanical Application DRAfT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a specific facility. 

A fadlit/s spedfic emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlity's adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has infonnation. Other facilities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

Belding Tank Technology (F.K.A. D & R Fabrication, Inc.) 

Ershigs, Inc. (Bellingham) 

Ershigs, Inc. (Wilson) 

MFG • Molded Fiber Glass Co. (Union City) 

40 

81 

59 

18 

Non Metallic Resources, Inc. 

Raven Industries, Inc. (Sioux Falls) 

Smith Fiberglass Produds, Inc. (Little Rock) 

Xerxes Corp. (Anaheim) 

Xerxes Corp. (Avon) 

Xerxes Corp. (Lakeland) 

Xerxes Corp. (Seguin) 

520 

81 

81 

81 

81 

81 

81 

81 

43.0 

43.1 

43.1 

43.1 

43.1 

43.1 

43.1 

43.1 

43.1 

43.1 

43.1 

43.1 

43.1 

11.1 

8.1 

2.5 

71.6 

11.1 

11.1 

11.1 

11.1 

11.1 

11.1 

11.1 

^9 

276 

276 

276 

276 

276 

276 

276 

276 

276 

276 

276 
Corrosion - Resistant Mechanical Application DRAFT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

Important Notes: I The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

MACT Model 

MACT Model Emissions 

Weighted Emissions per Ton Resin Process 

Resin Average % HAP Filler (before MACT) (before MACT) Redudion 

Rank Plant Name tel in neat resin plus tea te) (lbs/ton) Techniques 

34 

35 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

Xerxes Corp. (Tipton) 

Xerxes Corp. (Williamsport) 

Owens-Coming (Aubumdale) 

Owens-Coming (Mount Union) 

Owens-Coming Fiberglas (Conroe) 

Owens-Coming Tanks (Valparaiso) 

Picken's Plastics, Inc. 

Nova Group, Inc. 

81 

81 

10 

81 

81 

81 

81 

81 

47 

43.1 

43.1 

45.0 

11.1 

11.1 

1.5 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.1 

12.5 

12.5 

12.5 

12.5 

12.5 

7.3 

276 

276 

308 

308 

308 

308 

308 

308 

311 

C 

43 Red Ewald, Inc. 105 45.5 16.7 317 

44 Bradley Specialties Corp. 26 46.0 4.2 327 

45 Gpi Corp. 129 46.0 21.1 327 

46 Hastings Reinforced Plastics - Viatec (Hastings) 148 46.2 24.4 330 

47 Parkson Aeration & Fiberglas Corp., Inc. 25 46.3 4.2 332 

48 H & R Industries, Inc. 107 46.3 36 17.8 332 

49 New England Plastic Coated Produds, Inc. 17 46.7 2.9 340 

50 Diamond Fiberglass Fabricators, Inc. 76 47.0 13.1 346 

51 Spears Fabrication 19 47.0 3.3 346 

52 

53 

54 

55 

MFG Justin Tanks, Inc. 

Ashworth Plastic Produds 

Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Bakersfield) 

Beden-Baugh Produds, Inc. 

122 

81 

81 

87 

48.9 23.5 

50.0 16.4 

50.0 16.4 

56.9 24.8 

383 

406 

406 

568 

Projeded Total (including assumed values): 4444 615.9 

Average: 81 43.1 

Legend: 

Assumed values - No data provided 
Noncorrosion - Resistant Manual Application DRAFT 

3/17/98 

o:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to detennine or estimate adual emissions at a specifiI c fadlity. 

A fadlit/s spedfic emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facility's adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has infonnation. Other facilities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

t <5/° 
Noncorrosion - Resistant Manual Application 

.** 

DRAFT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

Rank 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

S. R. Smith, Inc. 

Arrowhead Plastic Engineering, Inc. 

Chance Operations, Inc. 

Hy-Tec Fiberglass, Inc. 

Gorman-Rupp Co. 

IKG Industries 

William Kreysler & Associates, Inc. 

Norton Performance Plastics Corp. 

Century Manufaduring Co. 

Blue,Dolphin Fiberglass Pools 

Gruber Systems, Inc. 

Larson Co. 

Oxford CMP, Inc. 

Fillings SRP 

Simon-Teleled, Inc. 

Fowler Manufacturing, Inc. 

Sunrise Fiberglass Corp. 

M. C. Gill Corp. 

Projeded Total (induding assumed values): 

Average: 

Legend: 

Assumed values - No data provided 

Resin 

tea 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus 

156 41.8 

70 

3 

80 

4 

127 

20 

1 

74 

liilliiil 

63 

16 

26 

2 

33 

439 

16 

79 

7977.3 

156.4 

F-YiRtlfic^Si^ 

Vacuum Bagging/Closed Mold Curing received a 45 % Emissior 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

44.0 

45.0 

45.0 

47.0 

48.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.5 

51.0 

57.4 

41.8 

Redudion Credit. 

Closed Mold Curing needs further Investigation. | 

Filler 

ite) 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

immmm 

0 

60 

0 

0 

0 

IlliSil i 

0 

0 

151 

0 

0 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

ami 

9.9 

4.7 

0.2 

5.4 

0.3 

9.5 

1.5 

0.1 

6.4 

14.8 

5.9 

1.5 

2.4 

0.2 

3 1 

42.4 

1.5 

10.2 

378.7 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Resin 

(before MACT) 

flbs/tonl 

126 

134 

134 

134 

142 

149 

149 

164 

172 

189 

189 

189 

189 

189 

189 

193 

197 

258 

Process 

Redudion 

Techniques 

" 

"" 

~ 

<3~ 
Noncorrosion - Resistant Mechanical Application DRAFT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

O 

C-I 
Noncorrosion - Resistant Mechanical Application DRAFT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

Rank 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

60 

61 

62 

63 

64 

65 

66 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to detennine or estimate adual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has infonnation. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Gibbon Fiberglass Reprod., Inc. 

Glasspec Associates, Ltd. 

Glasstite, Inc. 

Hess County Industries of WV, Inc. 

Johnson Truck Bodies 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Marley Cooling Tower Co. 9 

MFG - Molded Fiber Glass Co. (Adelanto) 

New York Blower Co. (Plant #2) 

Newport Laminates 

S.W.C. Industries, Inc. (Swiri-Way Div.) 

Style Crest Produds 

Universal Plastics, Inc. 

VMC Fiberglass Produds, Inc/Tri-Glas 

Odom Fiberglass, Inc. 

Kreider Manufaduring, Inc. 

Molded Plastic Industries, Inc. 

Comtech Antenna Systems, Inc. 

Dow Chemical (Russellville, AR) 

Eckler Industries 

Fibre Body Industries, Inc. 

Retterbush Injedion Molded Fiberglass Corp. 

Accra Industries, Inc. 

Fleetwood (Fontana - formerly Gold Shield) 

Cedar Manufaduring, Inc. (Bremen Glas) 

Continental Camper Co., Inc. 

A. R. E., Inc. (Mount Eaton) 

Tom Smith Fiberglass, Inc. 

Baja Produds Ltd. (Salisbury) 

American Reinforced Plastics 

Murphy Body Co. 

20th Century Fiberglass, Inc. (Plant Four) 

A-1 Fiberglass, Inc. 

Resin 

te) 

22 

18 

330 

494 

195 

Weighted 

-Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

Filler 

te) 

0 

0 

245 

494 

0 

534 ^^^^«^^ H

 437 

634 

209 

72 

180 

:i«526ll ! 

84 

82 

1,156 

83 

210 

102 

166 

20 

28 

250 

22 

77 

684 

367 

185 

987 

34 

100 

288 

115 

95 

395 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.3 

36.0 

370 

37.0 

37.0 

37.0 

37.0 

37.5 

37.8 

38.0 

38.0 

38.5 

44.0 

47.5 

39.5 

39.5 

40.0 

40.0 

0 

20 

0 

0 

. 699 

0 

0 

0 

32 

0 

0 

0 

0 

11 

0 

0 

12 

101 

359 

0 

494 

0 

0 

121 

0 

57 

40 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

te) 

1.7 

1.5 

26.4 

39.5 

15.6 

42.7 

50.7 

16.7 

5.8 

14.4 

42.0 

6.7 

6.6 

92.4 

6.6 

17.2 

8.8 

15.3 

1.8 

2.6 

23.1 

2.1 

7.4 

66.8 

36.4 

18.3 

101.3 

3.6 

10.9 

31.6 

12.6 

10.8 

44.8 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Resin 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton) 

160 

160 

: 160 

: 160 

: 160 

: 160 

160 

160 

160 

160 

; 160 

160 

; 160 

160 

160 

163 

172 

185 

185 

185 

186 

185 

191 

i 195 

198 

198 

205 

217 

; 218 

219 

219 

227 

227 

Process 

Reduction 

Techniques 

[••••••• H 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

-

-a 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

Some VSR 

VSR (75%) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

nm 

-1 

<H .] 
• • • 

Rank 

67 

68 

69 

70 

71 

72 

73 

74 

75 

76 

77 

78 

79 

80 

81 

82 

83 

84 

85 

86 

87 

88 

89 

90 

91 

92 

93 

94 

95 

96 

97 

98 

99 

| 

Noncorrosion - Resistant Mechanical Application 

Important Notes; I I 

D.RAFT 

3/17/98 

p:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a specific facility. 

A facility's spedfic emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Alliance Equipment Co. 

American Technology & Research Ind., Inc. 

Clark Manufaduring 

Covermaster, Inc. 

Fiberglass Forms, Inc. 

Fiberglass Spedalties, Inc. 

Florida Line of Astatula, Inc. 

Jason International, Inc. (N. Little Rock, AR) 

Kohler Co. 

Mr. Tubs, Inc. 

Phil Carter System, Inc. 

Piedmont Fiberglass, Inc. 

Plas-Tech, Ltd. 

Plastic Composites Corp. 

Seal Reinforced Fiberglass 

Syntechnics 

Universal Rundle Corp. (Union Point) 

Fleetwood (Gold Shield Fiberglass, Decatur) 

Plasti-Fab, Inc. 

U.S. Fiberglass Produds, Inc. 

Charioma Fiberglass, Inc. 

Fiberglass Industries, Inc. 

Lund Industries, Inc. 

Bathcraft, Inc. 

Aero Transportation Produds 

Aqua Bath Co., Inc. 

Aqua Glass Corp. (Klamath Falls) 

Associated Plastics, Inc. 

C & K Fiberglass Plastics, Inc. 

Delta Fiberglass & Environmental Produds, Inc 

ED Industries, Inc. (Sportsman Pickup Covers) 

Eljer Plumbingware (Wilson) 

Fiberglass Plus Recreational Industries, Inc. 

Resin 

te) 

526 

2 

661 

131 

120 

77 

131 

87 

550 

137 

46 

120 

40 

50 

9 

513 

1,410 

1,063 

92 

375 

344 

36 

493 

945 

547 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.2 

40.3 

46.0 

41.0 

41.0 

41.0 

41.2 

41.4 

Filler 

ted 

0 

0 

325 

0 

0 

0 

0 

64 

520 

110 

0 

0 

0 

20 

0 

0 

1,347 

277 

0 

0 

80 

0 

0 

987 

0 

526 41.4 550 

526 41.4 489 

161 

102 

41.4 63 

41.4 

526 41.4 

0 

0 

526 41.4 263 

526 41.4 205 

37 41.4 0 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

te) 

59.6 

0.2 

74.9 

14.8 

13.6 

8.7 

14.8 

9.8 

62.3 

15.5 

5.2 

13.6 

4.5 

5.7 

1.0 

58.1 

159.8 

122.0 

10.6 

44.4 

31.2 

4.4 

59.6 

115.7 

67.8 

65.2 

65.2 

20.0 

12.6 

65.2 

65.2 

65.2 

4.5 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Resin 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton) 

227 

! 227 

227 

227 

227 

227 

, 227 

i 227 

227 

227 

i 227 

227 

; 227 

227 

227 

227 

227 

230 

231 

237 

242 

, 242 

242 

245 

248 

; 248 

248 

248 

248 

248 

. 248 

: 248 

248 

Process 

Reduction 

Techniques 

Carbon filters, VSR 

VSR (50%, Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

CBI 
- • 

Noncorrosion - Resistant Mechanical Application 

Rank 

100 

101 

102 

103 

104 

105 

106 

107 

108 

109 

110 

111 

112 

113 

114 

115 

116 

117 

118 

119 

120 

121 

122 

123 

124 

125 

126 

127 

128 

129 

130 

131 

132 

Important Notes: I 

DRAFT 

3/17/98 

o:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

The average emissions fadors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist 

Plant Name 

Glas Master, Inc. (Plant #1) 

Glas Master, Inc. (Plant #2) 

Glasgo Plastics, Inc. 

GPM Industries, Inc. 

Images Produds Corp 

Jason Industries, Inc. (Elkhart, IN) 

Leer Midwest 

McClarin Plastics, Inc. 

Michiana Fiberglass, Inc. 

Miracle Recreation Co. 

Olympic Fiberglass Industries, Inc. 

S. R. Smith, Inc. 

Northwest Bodies, Inc. 

Electric-Glass, Inc. 

Elmore Truck Accessories, Inc. 

Fiberglass & Plastic Fab., Inc. 

Global Glass, Inc. 

Holiday Rambler Corp., Plant 36 and 37 

Standard Glas, Inc. 

LASCO Bathware (Elizabethtown) 

Acme Fiberglass, Inc. 

AKER Plastics Co., Inc. (Plymouth, N Oak Rd) 

AKER Plastics Co., Inc. (Plymouth, Pidco Dr) 

Americh Corp. (Charlotte, NC) 

Aqua Glass Corp- (Adamsville) 

Armorcast Products Co. 

Arrowhead Plastic Engineering, Inc. 

Chance Operations, Inc. 

Fiberdome, Inc. (Plant #1) 

Sunset Plastics, Inc. 

Tompkins - LASCO Bathware (South Boston) 

Tompkins - LASCO Bathware (Lancaster) 

Bremen Glas, Inc. 

. 

Resin 

flay) 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus 

526 41.4 

526 41.4 

Filler 

te!) 

0 

0 

526 41.4 205 

526 41.4 0 

109 41.4 43 

526 41.4 205 

600 41.4 500 

526 41.4 205 

526 41.4 0 

526 41.4 205 

526 41.4 0 

526 41.4 205 

147 

320 

35 

55 

276 

700 

125 

2,125 

185 

2,310 

165 

63 

10,143 

129 

70 

29 

100 

254 

2,770 

2,279 

1,159 

41.5 

42.0 

42.0 

42.0 

42.0 

42.0 

42.0 

47.7 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

48.1 

47.7 

44.0 

0 

45 

0 

0 

0 

58 

0 

3,305 

75 

2,379 

181 

25 

12,000 

63 

0 

0 

0 

215 

4,079 

3,565 

1,558 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

fley) 

65.2 

65.2 

65.2 

65.2 

13.5 

65.2 

74.4 

65.2 

65.2 

65.2 

65.2 

65.2 

18.4 

41.2 

4.5 

7.0 

35.5 

90.1 

16.1 

290.0 

25.3 

316.3 

22.5 

8.7 

1388.8 

17.6 

9.6 

4.0 

13.7 

22.5 

283.1 

319.3 

168.5 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Resin 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton) 

248 

248 

248 

248 

248 

248 

248 

! 248 

248 

• 248 

248 

248 

; 250 

258 

258 

258 

258 

258 

258 

273 

274 

274 

274 

274 

274 

274 

; 274 

; 274 

274 

274 

275 

280 

291 

Process 

Redudion 

Techniques 

Oxidizer (24% Control), VSR (Filled) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (70%, Filled Resin Systems) 

Oxidizer (25% Control), VSR (72%, Filled) 

Oxidizer (22% Control), VSR (Filled) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

CA 
• 

Rank 

133 

134 

135 

136 

137 

138 

139 

140 

141 

142 

143 

144 

145 

146 

147 

148 

149 

150 

151 

152 

153 

154 

155 

156 

157 

158 

159 

160 

161 

162 

163 

164 

165 

Noncorrosion - Resistant Mechanical Application 

Important Notes: 

| 

I 

DRAFT 

3/17/98 

o:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate adual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlity's specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has information. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Gorman-Rupp Co. 

Marquis Corp. 

Monarch Plastic, Inc. 

Specialty Plastics Assodates, Inc 

Miles Fiberglass & Plastics, Inc. 

Custom Fibreglass Manufacturing Co. 

Arrow Dynamics, Inc. 

Beaver Motor Coaches 

Brunnel Produds of Florida, Inc. 

Evelands, Inc. 

Fiberglass Engineering Corp. 

G. W. Fiberglass, Inc. 

McClure Industries, Inc. 

Melcher Manufaduring Co., Inc. 

Peterson Produds 

Pillings SRP 

Simon-Teleled, Inc. 

Trail Wagons, Inc. 

Country Coach, Inc. 

KBK Industries, Inc. 

Universal-Rundle Corp. (Ottumwa) 

Eljer Manufaduring (Valdosta) 

LASCO Bathware (Moapa) 

Baja Produds (Tucson, AZ) 

LASCO Bathware (Three Rivers) 

LASCO Bathware (Anaheim) 

LASCO Bathware (Cordele) 

Attbar Plastics, Inc. 

Fiber Pad, Inc. 

National Fiber Glass Produds, Inc. 

Nordic Fiberglass, Inc. (Devils Lake) 

Nordic Fiberglass, Inc. (Warren) 

Resin 

(toy) 

35 

526 

105 

44 

841 

70 

454 

34 

182 

63 

59 

75 

738 

140 

134 

23 

39 

33 

32 

99 

582 

2,500 

363 

6,259 

55 

2,815 

3,136 

1,977 

500 

95 

640 

316 

246 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus 

44.0 

^^^^^^^B 44.0 

44.0 

44.0 

44.1 

44.9 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.9 

46.0 

46.5 

47.0 

47.0 

47.5 

47.7 

47.7 

47.8 

48.0 

48.0 

48.0 

48.5 

48.5 

Filler 

ite) 

0 

0 

0 

0 

llllll l 

218 

0 

0 

79 

0 

0 

171 

101 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

50 

0 

3,276 

467 

9,845 

0 

4,387 

4,891 

3,092 

0 

0 

570 

270 

199 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

ite) 

5.1 

76.4 

15.3 

6.4 

122.3 

10.2 

69.6 

5.2 

28.0 

9.6 

9.1 

11.6 

113.8 

21.6 

20.7 

3.5 

6.0 

5.1 

4.9 

16.1 

95.1 

420.0 

62.7 

1081.4 

9.8 

505.6 

563.7 

356.0 

91.3 

17.3 

116.8 

59.3 

46.2 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Resin 

(before MACT) 

(Ibs/tom 

: 291 

: 291 

291 

291 

, 291 

292 

307 

308 

; 308 

308 

308 

: 308 

308 

308 

308 

308 

308 

308 

308 

325 

327 

336 

346 

346 

355 

. 359 

360 

; 360 

; 365 

365 

: 365 

375 

375 

Process 

Redudion 

Techniques 

.«MMMi.^H 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

rN 
« • 

Rank 

166 

167 

168 

169 

170 

171 

172 

173 

174 

175 

176 

177 

178 

179 

* 

Noncorrosion - Resistant Mechanical Application 

Important Notes: | | 

DRAFT 

3/17/98 

o:\n801\dbase\new aer\om.xls 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific fadlity. 

A fadlit/s specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the fadlit/s adual emissions and should therefore not be used. 

This database only contains fadlities for which the Administrator has infonnation. Other fadlities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Pearl Baths, Inc. 

Fiberglass Systems, Inc. 

Oasis Industries, Inc. 

Space Tables, Inc. 

Accurate Glass, Inc. 

Amtech Corp. 

Great Lakes Plastics Corp. 

Kivettjs, Inc. 

Larson Co. 

Plastic Development Co. 

Sunrise Fiberglass Corp. 

Ultra/Glas of Lakeville 

Dasco Pro, Inc. 

Universal-Rundle Corp. (New Castle) 

Projected Total (including assumed values): 

Average: 

Legend; 

Assumed values - No data provided 

Resin 

tel 

325 

235 

145 

12 

114 

47 

306 

43 

11 

140 

36 

154 

15 

3,585 

94102.8 

525.7 

ExiHsiMiiW ^ •^^^^ ^ 

Vacuum Bagging received a 45 % Emission Redudion Credit. 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus 

48.7 

49.0 

49.0 

49.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

55.0 

60.2 

41.4 

Filler 

ite) 

0 

118 

145 

1 

114 

0 

200 

0 

filllfl t 

0 

0 

0 

3 

3,257 

No Emission Redudion Credit was given for the use of Vapor Suppressants in filled Resin Systems. 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

Ooyj 

61.5 

45.3 

27.9 

2.4 

23.2 

9.5 

62.2 

8.8 

2.2 

28.4 

7.4 

31.3 

3.9 

1183.3 

11947.4 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

per Ton Resin 

(before MACT) 

< fibs/ton) 

; 378 

: 385 

i 385 

i 385 

i 406 

: 406 

406 

406 

406 

406 

406 

; 406 

521 

660 

Process 

Redudion 

Techniques