alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                        1000
<CURRENCY>                          USD

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                     1
<CASH>                              1,966
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       25,466
<ALLOWANCES>                        (959)
<INVENTORY>                         41,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    73,768
<PP&E>                              35,610
<DEPRECIATION>                      (22,828)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      100,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               19,834
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            329
<OTHER-SE>                          58,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        100,777
<SALES>                             35,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    35,377
<CGS>                               19,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       33,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     1,412
<INCOME-TAX>                        534
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 878
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        878
<EPS-BASIC>                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.13


</TABLE>
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1067 

Recognizing the 175th anniversary of the organization of Laclede County, 

Missouri, and the city of Lebanon, Missouri. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2024 

Mr. ALFORD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 175th anniversary of the organization of 

Laclede County, Missouri, and the city of Lebanon, Missouri. 

Whereas, on February 24, 1849, Laclede County, Missouri, 

and Lebanon, Missouri, were organized; 

Whereas Laclede County is made up of more than 36,000 

proud Missourians, and Lebanon of more than 14,000 

Missourians; 

Whereas Laclede County was named after Pierre Laclede, the 

founder of St. Louis, Missouri; and 

Whereas the city of Lebanon, Missouri, is the largest municipality of Laclede County, Missouri: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1067 IH 

1 (1) recognizes the 175th anniversary of the or2 ganization of Laclede County, Missouri, and the city 

3 of Lebanon, Missouri; and 

4 (2) acknowledges the importance of Laclede 

5 County, Missouri, and the city of Lebanon, Missouri, 

6 to the State of Missouri. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 2943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1123]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[EPA-R05-OAR-2010-0523; FRL-9619-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation 
of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Illinois; Redesignation of 
the Illinois Portion of the St. Louis, MO-IL Area to Attainment for the 
1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is extending the comment period for a proposed rule 
published December 22, 2011 (76 FR 79579). On December 22, 2011, EPA 
proposed to approve the State of Illinois' request to redesignate the 
Illinois portion of the St. Louis, MO-IL nonattainment area (Jersey, 
Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties) to attainment for the 1997 8-
hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). In 
conjunction with the proposed approval of the redesignation request, 
EPA proposed to approve, as a revision to the Illinois State 
Implementation Plan, the State's plan for maintaining the 1997 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS through 2025 in the area. EPA also proposed to approve the 
2002 emissions inventory as meeting the comprehensive emissions 
inventory requirement of the Clean Air Act for the Illinois portion of 
the St. Louis area. Finally, EPA proposed to approve the State's 2008 
and 2025 Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for the Illinois portion of the 
St. Louis area. In response to a December 22, 2011, request from David 
C. Bender, EPA is extending the comment period for 30 days.

DATES: Comments. The public comment period for the proposed rule 
published December 22, 2011 (76 FR 79579) is being extended for 30 days 
to February 22, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2010-0523, to: Douglas Aburano, Chief, Attainment Planning and 
Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604, (312) 353-6960, aburano.douglas@epa.gov. Additional 
instructions to comment can be found in the notice of proposed 
rulemaking published December 22, 2011 (76 FR 79579).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen D'Agostino, Environmental 
Engineer, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs 
Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-1767, 
dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov.

    Dated: January 9, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2012-1123 Filed 1-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
### §302504. Participation of certified local governments in National Register nominations

(a) Notice.—Before a property within the jurisdiction of a certified local government may be considered by a State to be nominated to the Secretary for inclusion on the National Register, the State Historic Preservation Officer shall notify the owner, the applicable chief local elected official, and the local historic preservation commission.

(b) Report.—The local historic preservation commission, after reasonable opportunity for public comment, shall prepare a report as to whether the property, in the Commission's opinion, meets the criteria of the National Register. Within 60 days of notice from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the chief local elected official shall transmit the report of the commission and the recommendation of the local official to the State Historic Preservation Officer.

(c) Recommendation.—

(1) Property nominated to national register.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), after receipt of the report and recommendation, or if no report and recommendation are received within 60 days, the State shall make the nomination pursuant to section 302104 of this title. The State may expedite the process with the concurrence of the certified local government.

(2) Property not nominated to national register.—If both the commission and the chief local elected official recommend that a property not be nominated to the National Register, the State Historic Preservation Officer shall take no further action, unless, within 30 days of the receipt of the recommendation by the State Historic Preservation Officer, an appeal is filed with the State. If an appeal is filed, the State shall follow the procedures for making a nomination pursuant to section 302104 of this title. Any report and recommendations made under this section shall be included with any nomination submitted by the State to the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3198.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302504 | 16 U.S.C. 470a(c)(2). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §101(c)(2), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 915; Pub. L. 91–383, §11, as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1942; Pub. L. 93–54, §1(d), July 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 139; Pub. L. 96–205, title VI, §608(a)(1), (2), Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 92; Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §201(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2992. |

Section
**FISCA L YEA** **R [YEA R] SPREA** **DSHEET FOR SMA LL, RURA**  **L SCHOOL A CHIEVEMENT PROGRA**  **M A ND RURA**  **L LOW-INCOME SCHOOL PROGRA M**  **STA TE:**  **School Locale Code Test Request**

**NCES DISTRICT ID**  **# NCES** 

**SCHOOL ID #**  **STA**

**TE SCHOOL ID**  **# DISTRICT NA**  **ME SCHOOL NA**  **ME AD**  **DRESS CITY**  **COUNTY STA**  **TE ZIP**  **ZIP+4** The NCES District ID - found on the State Eligibility Spreadsheet or http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/search.asp The NCES School ID - found on the NCES website: http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/search.asp LEA Locale codes for REAP are a combination of the locale codes for each school in the District. To determine the locale codes of each school in the LEA, go to the NCES website. W hen the FY [YEAR] data is posted, it will be found at: http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/search.asp Directions: Make sure to include only the SCHOOLS in the District that need to be tested. Include both the District name and the individual name of each school. If the address submitted matches the address on file at NCES, there will be NO CHANGE in the locale code. The address submitted should be a physical location of a school building and not a P.O. Box or mailing address. Make sure you include the City, County, State and Zip.



### Public Burden Statement: According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless su ch collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 40 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, sea rching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and 1 of 2

### for this collection of information is estimated to average 40 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, sea rching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain o r r etain benefit (ESEA Section 6212/6221). Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. D epa rtment of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210

- 4537 or email ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1810

- 0646. Note: Please do not return the completed REAP application to this address. If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission of this form write directly to: Email: REAPSEA@ed.gov Subject: SRSA Application Status

2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Alan Black, Respondent, v. Thermasol Ltd., Appellant.

Order and judgment unanimously modified to delete the first, second and third decretal paragraphs and in lieu thereof to provide that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file an answer to the petition within five days after service of the order entered hereon with notice of entry, and as so modified affirmed, without eosts. In view of the fact that the petitioner, as a qualified stockholder of the corporation, on December 31, 1963, served upon the corporation a demand for an inspection of its books and records, this proceeding was timely brought and the motion to dismiss the petition was properly denied but the respondent-appellant should have been permitted to answer. The petition sought and the order granted an inspection, among other items, of “the complete books and records of account” of the respondent corporation. While the petitioner as a stockholder is not entitled to such an inspection as a matter of course (see Business Corporation Law, § 624), this article 78 proceeding is maintainable to secure such an inspection in a proper case. (See Business Corporation Law, § 624, subd. [£]; McKinney’s Cons. Laws of H. Y., Book 6, part 2, p. 463, Analysis of Business Corporation Law.) Where, however, as here, an objection is made in point of law by a motion to dismiss the petition in such a proceeding, the court, upon denial of the motion, should permit the respondent to answer. (CPLR 7804, subd. [£].) The right of the respondent here to answer was not waived. By letter addressed and sent to the court before the signing of the order denying the motion to dismiss, the respondent made known that it was insisting on the right to answer. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Exhibit 12.01

                                  SBARRO, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           FISCAL YEAR
                                                                           -----------

                                                 2003          2002          2001           2000            1999
                                                 ----          ----          ----           ----            ----
Fixed charges:
<S>                                             <C>             <C>          <C>           <C>            <C>
Interest expense                                $31,039         $30,959      $30,950       $30,243        $  7,899
Rental expense                                   23,068          23,424       24,154        22,412          21,845
                                                 ------          ------       ------        ------          ------
Total fixed charges (1)                         $54,107         $54,383      $55,104       $52,655         $29,744
                                                =======         =======      =======       =======         =======
Earnings available for fixed charges:
Earnings (2)                                   $(16,764)       $  4,165     $(14,573)      $20,113         $48,156
Add fixed charges                                54,107          54,383       55,104        52,655          29,744
                                                 ------          ------       ------        ------          ------
Total earnings available for fixed charges      $37,343         $58,548      $40,531       $72,768         $77,900
                                                =======         =======      =======       =======         =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (3)             0.7             1.1          0.7           1.4             2.6
                                                   ===             ===          ===           ===             ===
</TABLE>


(1)      Total fixed  charges  consist of interest and one-third of rent expense
         (deemed to be a reasonable  approximation  of the  interest  factor for
         rent).
(2)      Earnings  represents  income before income taxes,  cumulative effect of
         change in method of  accounting,  minority  interest  and equity in net
         income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates.
(3)      The ratio of  earnings  to fixed  charges  has been  computed  based on
         dividing  total  earnings  available  for fixed  charges by total fixed
         charges.
HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13498 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13499 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13500 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13501 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13502 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13503 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13504 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13505 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13506 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13507 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13508 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13509 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13510 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13511 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13512 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13513 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13514 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13515 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13516 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13517 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13518 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13519 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13520 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13521 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13522 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13523 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13524 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13525 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13526 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13527 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13528 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13529 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13530 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13531 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13532 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13533 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13534 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13535 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13536 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13537 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13538 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13539 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13540 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13541 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13542 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13543 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13544 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13545 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13546 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13547 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13548 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13549 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13550 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13551 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13552 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13553 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13554 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13555 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13556 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13557 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13558 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13559 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13560 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13561 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13562 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13563 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13564 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13565 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13566 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13567 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13568 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13569 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13570 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13571 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 13572 1992
§ 1800.1 Authority and purpose. This part is issued under the authority of and in order to implement the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), as amended (5 U.S.C. 552); and section 102 of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended (50 U.S.C. 403). It prescribes procedures for: ( a ) Requesting information on available NACIC records, or NACIC administration of the FOIA, or estimates of fees that may become due as a result of a request;
( b ) Requesting records pursuant to the FOIA; and
( c ) Filing an administrative appeal of an initial adverse decision under the FOIA.
Exhibit 4.81
  LEASE CONTRACT
 Contract NO.:0734
 Lessor: China National Precision Machinery I&E Corp. Beijing Aerospace CPMIEC Building
 Lessee: Fortune (Beijing) Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd.
 Property: Room 619, 6th Floor Beijing Aerospace CPMIEC Building
 Date: June 10 th , 2009




---



##### 



LEASE CONTRACT
 Lessor:
    
    China National Precision Machinery I&E Corp. Beijing Aerospace CPMIEC Building (hereinafter
referred to as Party A)
 Responsible Person: Zhang Hong
Address: No.30 Haidian South Road, Beijing, China
Postal code: 10080
 Lessee: Fortune (Beijing) Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as Party B)
Legal Representative:
Address:
Postal code:
Phone:
  Article 1 Subject Matter of Lease
  Article 2 Term of Lease
 th th




---



##### 



Article 3 Rent
    Article 4 Deposit




---



##### 



Article 5 Payment (including rent and deposit)
 th
   Article 6 Obligations of Party A




---



##### 








---



##### 



Article 7 Obligations of Party B




---



##### 








---



##### 



Article 8 Liabilities for Breach
    Article 9 Exemption




---



##### 



Article 10 Modification, Termination and Expiration of the Contract
     Article 11 Notifications
  Article 12 Dispute Resolution
  Article 13 Miscellaneous (including execution, effectiveness, counterparts)




---



##### 



Party As Representative:Party A: China National Precision Machinery I&E Corp. Beijing Aerospace CPMIEC BuildingAddress: No.30 Haidian South RoadTelephone: 62626112Bank: Hangtian Branch of Beijing BankAccount No.: 01090372800120111017413
 Party Bs Representative:Party B:Address:Telephone:Bank:Account No.:
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

November 22 , 2022

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00481

- CV

WM TRUCKING & EXCAVA TING, INC. , Appellant
V.
SPRINT SAND AND CLAY , LLC , Appellee
On Appeal from the 400th District Co ur t Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17

- DCV

- 240294

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 6, 2022 . On November 14, 2022, appellant filed a motion , joined by appellee, to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1

. The motion is granted.
We dism iss the appeal

. PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
§ 1903.15 Preservation of property. The following are prohibited: ( a ) *Property damage.* Destroying or damaging private or Government property.
( b ) *Theft.* The theft of private or Government property.
( c ) *Creation of hazard.* The creation of hazard to persons or things, the throwing of articles of any kind from or at buildings, vehicles, or persons while on an Agency installation.
( d ) *Improper disposal.* The improper disposal of trash or rubbish while on an Agency installation.
[63 FR 44786, Aug. 21, 1998, as amended at 88 FR 20763, Apr. 7, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                     
<ARTICLE>                                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
                           
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                    1,343
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            17,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                805
<INVENTORY>                              21,141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          8,629
<PP&E>                                   16,987
<DEPRECIATION>                           12,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           62,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    23,045
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  2,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                               16,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             62,976
<SALES>                                  19,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         19,874
<CGS>                                    14,809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            14,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          4,911
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              60 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 23 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          37 
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                 37 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.01 
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.01   



</TABLE>
#### § 885.5 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Award* means to approve our grant agreement authorizing you to draw down and expend program funds.

*Distribute* means to annually assign funds to a specific State or Indian tribe. After distribution, funds are available for award in a grant to that specific State or Indian tribe.

*Reclamation plan* or *State reclamation plan* means a plan that a State or Indian tribe submitted and that we approved under section 405 of SMCRA and part 884 of this chapter.