alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, James P. Regan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics ResearchCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:August 8, 2005     /s/ James P. Regan     James P. Regan  Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer
49
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Injuries and Accident Causes in the Longshore Industry, 1942

              																	McCormack, George R. (George Robertson)					 and 	McElroy, Frank S. (Frank Shafer). 						*Injuries and Accident Causes in the Longshore Industry, 1942 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 764*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4248,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### In the Matter of Louis Pergola, Petitioner, v Norman B. Fitzer, as Justice Presiding of Part A of the Special Narcotics Court of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Application of petitioner denied and petition dismissed without costs and - without disbursements. No opinion. Concur-Kupferman, J. P., Silverman, Lane and Markewich, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER II—LEASE, EXCHANGE, OR MANAGEMENT OF HISTORIC PROPERTY
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2003



                                   FORM 6-K/A

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                Reports for the Months of February and March 2003

                            New Skies Satellites N.V.

                              Rooseveltplantsoen 4
                                2517 KR The Hague
                                 The Netherlands

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

         Form 20-F...X...                                     Form 40-F......


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         Yes......                                              No...X...


If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
..............................N/A................................................

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



New Skies Satellites N.V.



By: /s/ Mary J. Dent
    ----------------
Name:  Mary J. Dent
Title: General Counsel and Management Board Member



Date:    April 3, 2003

<PAGE>


Exhibit Index:


1.1  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated February 28, 2003.
1.2  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 6, 2003.
1.3  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 7, 2003.
1.4  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 11, 2003.
1.5  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 13, 2003.
1.6  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 13, 2003.
1.7  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 14, 2003.
1.8  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 17, 2003.
1.9  Report of New Skies Satellites N.V. to the Dutch Autoriteit Financiet
     Markten dated March 25, 2003.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6127

JOSE LOPEZ

- DIAZ , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. H. JOYNER, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv - 03471

- JMC )

Submitted : September 10, 2020 Decided: September 15, 2020

Before WILKINSON and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion

. Jose Lopez

- Diaz , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jose Lopez

- Diaz appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction . The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The magistrate judge recommended that the case be dismissed and advised Lopez

- Diaz that failure to file timely , specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is
necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v

. Duffy , 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 846

- 47 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 154

- 55 (1985). Although Lopez

- Diaz received proper notice and filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, he has waived appellate review because the objections were not specific to the par ticularized legal recommendations made by the magistrate judge. See Martin , 858 F.3d at 245 (holding that, “to preserve for appeal an issue in a magistrate judge’s report, a party must object to the finding or recommendation on that issue with sufficient specificity so as reasonably to alert the district court of the true ground for the objection” (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court . However, we modify the dismissal order, Lopez

- Diaz v. Joyner , N o. 1:18

- cv - 03471

- JMC (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2020), to reflect dismissal without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, and affirm the dismissal as modified, 28 U.S.C. § 2106.3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF I

. A

. R ., A CHILD

,

Appellant

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 2 3 3

- C V

Appeal from the

65 th D istrict Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20 19 DCM 7904 )

O R D E R

In order to protect the identity of the minor child who is the subject of this appeal, the Court

has determined on its own motion that it is necessary to identify the child by her initials, I

. A

. R

.,

and the parent by initials as well, in all papers submitted to the Court, including letters, motions,

and briefs. See Tex.R.App.P. 9.8. The Court will also refer to the child and parent by their initials

in correspondence, orders, and in its opinion and judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15 th d ay of November

, 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , J J

.
Exhibit 32.01 - Certification of Interim Chief Executive Officer and
                                     Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Catherine Thompson, Interim Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of OHANA ENTERPRISES, INC (the "Registrant"),
do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

     (1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which
this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully
complies with the equirements of section 13(a) of the ecurities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);

          and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.

Date: November 22, 2004

/s/ Catherine Thompson
Catherine Thompson
Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 924.1 Scope.

This part contains all rules applicable only within the State of Mississippi which have been adopted under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.

[45 FR 58525, Sept. 4, 1980]
§ 924.10 State program approval. ( a ) The Mississippi State program, as submitted on August 2, 1979, and resubmitted on May 27, 1980, is approved, effective September 4, 1980. Copies of the approved program are available at: ( 1 ) Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Geology, Southport Center, 2380 Highway 80 West, Jackson, Mississippi 39289-1307. Telephone (601) 961-5530.
( 2 ) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Birmingham Field Office, 135 Gemini Circle, Birmingham, Alabama 34209. Telephone (205) 290-7282.
( b ) [Reserved]
[45 FR 58525, Sept. 4, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 17930, Apr. 15, 1994; 63 FR 43320, Aug. 13, 1998]
#### § 21.430 What are the responsibilities of the head of the awarding or administering activity?

When designated by the Head of the DoD Component or his or her designee (see 32 CFR 21.425), the head of the awarding or administering activity (*i.e.,* the HCA) is responsible for the awards made by or assigned to that activity. He or she must supervise and establish internal policies and procedures for that activity's awards.
# C_2023113EN.01000501.xml

| 28.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11066 – BERKSHIRE PARTNERS / GTCR / POINT BROADBAND)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 113/05)

On 17 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11066. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11066. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 23.10



LOGO



Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

FNB Corp.



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-72686, 333-54702, 333-99333, 333-105442 and 333-109450) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 33-59565) on Form S-3 of FNB
Corp. of our reports dated March 14, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of FNB Corp. and subsidiaries, and managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.



LOGO



March 14, 2006

Raleigh, North Carolina
EXHIBIT 10.32

                               ROBERT A. LEVINSON
                           1065 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
                               NEW YORK, NY 10018


March 21, 2006


TO:      BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LEVCOR INTERNATIONAL



         This letter will serve to reaffirm my commitment to personally support
the cash needs of Levcor International through January 2, 2008 and not to demand
any repayment of principle or interest currently owed to me until January 1,
2008.

         This commitment is a reaffirmation of my commitment to our independent
auditors, as reflected in their year-end rep letter and disclosed in the K and
the Q.

         I am prepared to fund up to a maximum of $3 million to meet the cash
needs of Levcor International, if necessary.


                                       Sincerely yours,


                                       /s/ ROBERT A. LEVINSON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert A. Levinson
### §3107. Employment of publicity experts; restrictions

Appropriated funds may not be used to pay a publicity expert unless specifically appropriated for that purpose.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 416.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 54. | Oct. 22, 1913, ch. 32, §1 (last par. under "Interstate Commerce Commission"), 38 Stat. 212. |

Statutes at Large

The prohibition is restated in positive form.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
#### NICHOLS et al. v. LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. et al.

Docket No. 22723.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Motion Submitted Feb. 1, 1954.

Decided March 22, 1954.

*393Harold G. Aron, New York City, for plaintiffs.

^ ,T _r , , David K. Kadane, New York City, for defendant.

^ Myron S. Isaacs, Associate General Counsel Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D. C., for inter-venor-appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In our prior opinion in this case, 2 Cir., 207 F.2d 931, we affirmed the order of the district court dismissing the action herein. We did so first on the ground that the action was a collateral attack and as such was prohibited by the injunction accompanying the consolidation decree. Moreover, we found that the claims presented were not new but a een passe on e ore or were known at the time of previous attacks on the decree. See, In re Long Island Lighting Co 2 Cir. 197 F.2d 709. Thus the plaintiffs should have been barred from proceeding further on the basis of the allegations presented in the complaint. However, Judge Inch’s order dismissing the action contained the following clause: without prejudice to any further proceedings which the plaintiffs herein may desire to undertake, pursuant to this Court’s reserved jurisdiction in said Civil Action No. 10,413, to vacate or modify the order in the aforesaid action by reason of the aliegations set forth m the *complaint here-m.”'*In view of our further finding of *resjudicata this clause*should have been stricken out Accordingly, we modify our former decision by striking out the above clause, and as modified we affirm the order dismissing the action below.

Judgment modified and as modified affirmed; mandate recalled and amended accordingly.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 22

                             SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                           JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY                                                                               OF INCORPORATION
------------------------------------------------------------------              -----------------------------------

<S>                                                                                    <C>
GENICOM International Holdings Corporation                                                   Delaware

GENICOM International Sales Corporation                                                      Delaware

Enterprising Service Solutions Corporation                                                   Delaware

Delmarva Technologies Corporation                                                            Delaware

Rastek Corporation                                                                           Delaware

Rastek Japan Ltd.                                                                              Japan

Printer Systems Corporation                                                                  Virginia

Printer Connection, Inc.                                                                     Virginia

Printer Systems International, Inc.                                                          Virginia

GENICOM Canada, Inc.                                                                          Canada

GENICOM Foreign Sales Corporation                                                       U.S. Virgin Islands

GENICOM Euro Holdings B.V.                                                                The Netherlands

GENICOM Belgium                                                                               Belgium

GENICOM International Limited                                                                 England

GENICOM (No. 1) Limited                                                                       England

GENICOM Ltd.                                                                                  England

GENICOM S.A.R.L.                                                                              France

GENICOM S.A.                                                                                  France

GENICOM GmbH                                                                                  Germany

GENICOM S.p.A.                                                                                 Italy

GENICOM (Australia) PTY LTD.                                                                 Australia

GENICOM Pty Limited                                                                          Australia

GENICOM Sweden AB                                                                             Sweden
</TABLE>

                                     E-22
### §20101. Congressional declaration of purpose

It is the intention of Congress in enacting this chapter to promote the fundamental right to vote by improving access for handicapped and elderly individuals to registration facilities and polling places for Federal elections.

(Pub. L. 98–435, §2, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1973ee of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 98–435, §9, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1680, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] shall apply with respect to elections taking place after December 31, 1985."