alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Helen Gearity, Appellant, v Owen Golden, M.D., et al., Respondents.

[834 NYS2d 138]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered January 5, 2006, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants provided legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for plaintiff’s termination, and plaintiff did not meet her consequent burden to show that those reasons were false or unworthy of belief and that the actual reason was her age *(see Ferrante v American Lung Assn.,*90 NY2d 623, 629-630 [1997]; *Hardy v General Elec. Co.,*270 AD2d 700 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 765 [2000]). Indeed, the evidence on the motion discloses that defendant Dr. Golden hired plaintiff when she was 60, and persuaded her to stay on when she tendered her resignation at *344age 63, after a dispute between her and the office manager *(see Moon v Clear Channel Communications,*307 AD2d 628, 632 [2003]). In addition, while defendant medical practice may have hired another employee shortly before plaintiffs termination, the record does not substantiate plaintiffs assertion that this employee “replaced her”; the office manager averred that the new employee was a probationary hourly employee whose primary duties were copying and filing *(see Mike v Haylor, Freyer & Coon,*169 AD2d 911 [1991]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 9 July 2008 – Trubowest Handel and Makarov v Council and Commission**

**(Case T-429/04)**

Non-contractual liability – Anti-dumping duties – Anti-dumping Regulation (EC) No 2320/97 – Lawyers’ fees incurred in domestic proceedings – Inadmissibility – Material and non-material damage – Causal link

1.                     *Actions for damages – Subject-matter – Compensation claim against the Community under Article 288, second paragraph, EC –
Exclusive jurisdiction of the Court – Review of the nature of the action – Application for refund of anti-dumping duties paid
pursuant to a Community regulation claimed to be unlawful – Jurisdiction of the national courts (Arts 234, first para., (b),
EC, 235 EC and 288, second para, EC; Council Regulation No 2913/92, Arts 243 to 246) (see paras 43, 45, 47-48, 51, 54, 56,
63, 66, 70-73, 114-115)*

2.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Causal link – Burden of proof – Break in the causal link by reason of the wrongful
conduct of the applicant (Arts 235 EC and 288 EC) (see paras 100-103, 113-117, 121-124, 126-134)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for compensation under Article 288 EC, in respect of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants by reason of the adoption of Council Regulation (EC) No 2320/97 of 17 November 1997 imposing definitive anti‐dumping duties on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or non‐alloy steel originating in Hungary, Poland, Russia, the Czech Republic, Romania and the Slovak Republic, repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1189/93 and terminating the proceeding in respect of such imports originating in the Republic of Croatia (OJ 1997 L 322, p. 1). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Trubowest Handel GmbH and Victor Makarov to pay, in addition to their own costs, the costs incurred by the Council and the Commission. |
Appeal No. 75-30.

#### Adam Farkas *v.*Albert M. Sadler *et al.*

*Adam Farkas,*pro se, for defendant.

*Leonard A. Kiernan, Jr., James A. Currier,*for defendants.

The plaintiff’s motion to correct the record is denied.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1081 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to establish a Committee 

on Health as a standing committee of the House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2024 

Mr. DAVIDSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

establish a Committee on Health as a standing committee of the House. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘House Endeavor 

4 to Accelerate a Legislative Transformation of Healthcare 

5 Act’’ or the ‘‘HEALTH Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMITTEE ON HEALTH. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause 1 of rule X of the Rules 

8 of the House of Representatives is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (j) through (t) 

10 as paragraphs (k) through (u); and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1081 IH 

1 (2) by inserting after paragraph (i) the fol2 lowing new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(j) COMMITTEE ON HEALTH.— 

4 ‘‘(A) Biomedical research and development, 

5 including the Food and Drug Administration. 

6 ‘‘(B) Health, health facilities, and health 

7 care supported by general revenues (except vet8 erans’ hospitals, medical care, and treatment of 

9 veterans). 

10 ‘‘(C) Public health and quarantine, includ11 ing the Centers for Disease Control and Pre12 vention.’’. 

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING JURIS14 DICTION OF STANDING COMMITTEES.— 

15 (1) COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE

16 WORKFORCE.—Clause 1(e)(6) of such rule is amend17 ed by striking ‘‘generally’’ and inserting ‘‘generally 

18 (except health insurance programs)’’. 

19 (2) COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE.— 

20 Clause 1(f) of such rule is amended— 

21 (A) by striking subparagraphs (1), (3), 

22 and (12); and 

23 (B) by redesignating the remaining sub24 paragraphs accordingly. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official pa per version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 

### LEA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL 7 

### FACILITY, 8 

### Plaintiff-Appellee, 9



### v. NO. 29,552 10 

### DEVIN JASPERSE, 11 

### Defendant-Appellant. 12 

### APPEAL FROM THE LEA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 13 

### ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION 14 

### Lt. B. Buckelew, Hearing Officer 15 

### Devin Jasperse 16 

### Hobbs, NM 17 

### Pro Se Appellant 18 

### Lea County Correctional Facility 19 

### Hobbs, NM 20 

### for Appellee 21



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 22 

### VIGIL, Judge. 232 

### Defendant, an inmate in the Lea County jail, attempts to appeal, pro se, the 1 

### Warden’s final decision that he was guilty of a drug offense, and his placement in 2 

### administrative segregation. [Informal Do cketing Statement, Ct. App. file--blue 3 

### clip] He has attempted to appeal direc tly to our Court. Our notice proposed to 4 

### dismiss this appeal, reasoning that we ar e without jurisdiction because the required 5 

### avenue from such a Warden’s decision is an appeal or habeas petition to district 6 

### court. Defendant has not responded to our notice and the time for doing so is long 7 

### past. 8 

### Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. 9 

### IT IS SO ORDERED. 10
11 12 

### MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 13 

### WE CONCUR: 14

15 

### MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 16

17 

### JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 18
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

The following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 and
is not filed as provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the S

arbanes -- Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics Research
Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:

(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ David Keleher
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David Keleher
                                       Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                                       Officer
                                       May 10, 2005
Exhibit
32.1








The
following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 and is not
filed as provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and
Exchange Commission.





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes—Oxley
Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dynamics Research
Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:





(1) the
Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
      10, 2008
              /s/
      James P. ReganChairman,
      President and Chief Executive
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       710738
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     132761
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          146862
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        204626
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   75984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1270791
<COMMON>                                        102180
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       217476
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              53906
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  373562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            27468
<PREFERRED>                                       6900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            334842
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        57439
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    72517
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  398063
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1270791
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       422635
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                              9893
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      369313
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      379206
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          43429
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               15287
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   58716
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         29609
<NET-INCOME>                                     29107
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       1729
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    27378
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         25443
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        24460
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           90947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.245
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.245
        

</TABLE>
### §8431. Certain transfers to be treated as a separation

(a) For purposes of this subchapter, separation from Government employment includes a transfer from a position that is subject to one of the retirement systems described in subsection (b) to a position that is not subject to any of them.

(b) The retirement systems described in this subsection are—

(1) the retirement system under this chapter;

(2) the retirement system under subchapter III of chapter 83; and

(3) any other retirement system under which individuals may contribute to the Thrift Savings Fund through withholdings from pay.

(Added Pub. L. 106–168, title II, §203(a)(1), Dec. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1820.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8431, added Pub. L. 99–335, title I, §101(a), June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 541; amended Pub. L. 101–509, title V, §529 [title I, §101(b)(6)(B)], Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1427, 1440, provided a definition of "basic pay" for this subchapter, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(f) [title VI, §659 [title II, §§206(a)(2), 207]], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–314, 3009–372, 3009–378, effective Sept. 30, 1996.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 106–168, title II, §203(c), Dec. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1820, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section and amending section 8351 of this title] shall apply with respect to transfers occurring before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 12, 1999], except that, for purposes of applying such amendments with respect to any transfer occurring before such date of enactment, the date of such transfer shall be considered to be the date of the enactment of this Act. The Executive Director (within the meaning of section 8401(13) of title 5, United States Code) may prescribe any regulations necessary to carry out this subsection."
# fioatlib @ourt 

# of

# €tmrsls

Court 

### of Appeals 

## No, if known' 

## 04-15-00125-CR Trial Court Style: 

## State

# v. Hector Ramirez rriat court No.. 

### 20 1

### 3C 

## R2994-W1 I am the 

### official responsible for 

### prepuing the clerk's record/reporter's record [circle one] in the abovereferenced 

### appeal. The approximate date

## oftial ry6s; n/a The record was

### originally due: April6, 2ots 

### I anticipate the length 

### of the record 

### to be: n/a 

### I am unable 

### to file the recorrd by the date such record is due because [check one]: 

# D the appellant is not entitled to appeal without 

### payng tlre fee, and the appellant has failed to pay the

fee or make arrangements to 

### paythe feefor preparing such record

# n my otherduties or activities 

### precludeworking ontherecord and includethe 

### following [atractl additional pages 

### if neededl :


# tr Other. Explain [attach additional pages

### if needed].

### There 

### was no record 

### 1a1le ln

## this cause.

I anticipatethe record

### will be completed 

### by: 

## n/a I, as

# the oourt 

### official, certify

### thd acopy 

### ofthis Notification 

### of Late Record has bee,n served by first class 

### mail of

### fur to the partiesto thejudgrnent or order being ap,pealed. 

## Da&.412An5 Signature: Printed 

### Name: 

## Lisa 

## J. Ramos

Rev. 1.8.14 .1.1r1r.

## Official Court Reporter, 227th District Court
### §415a–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 415a–1, comprising section 506A of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3097 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

1:00 p.m., December 18, 2020.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# STATUS: 

Closed. The Board invoked the exemption described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and 10 CFR 1704.4(b). The Board determined that it is necessary to close this meeting to the public since an open meeting would likely disclose information related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the agency.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

At this meeting, members of the Board will receive a staff briefing and deliberate on appropriate agency reorganization to accommodate the Executive Director of Operations position.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Tara Tadlock, Director of Board Operations, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number.

Dated: December 16, 2020.

Thomas Summers,

Acting Chairman.

[FR Doc. 2020-28135 Filed 12-16-20; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
#### CLARK, Appellant, v. BUFFALO & W. ELECTRIC RY. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 24, 1903.)

Action by Arthur E. Clark against the Buffalo & Williamsville Electric Railway Company.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed, without costs. *Held,*it appearing that the action is now being tried, the consideration of the appeal from this order is unnecessary.
In The Matter Of: HELOAIR INC.,**Resp~ndent** 

## ·<SERVED AUGUST 14,2012
U.S. DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC
) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2012-0472 Case No. 2011-EA-210081

ORDER GRANTING FAA'S MOTION FQRCONTINUANCE OF RULE 

### 16 CONFERENCE IZ

On August 6,2012 an Order for Respondent to Show Cause Whythe FAA's Motion for Postponement ShouldNotbe Granted was filed. On August 10,2012 the Respondent's Response to Motion for Postponement of Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference was filed. In this Response, the Respondent agreed to the FAA's request for a one day continuance.

It Is Hereby Ordered: 1) The FAA's Motion for a one-day Postponement ofthe Rule 16 Litigat!<m Scheduling Conference is granted. 2) The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, previously set on September 18, 2012, is continued to Wednesday, September 19, 2012 at ll:OOam EST.

Attachment: Service List ivan**~WD~rr:suative**LawJudgeFDMS NO. FAA-2012-0472 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL and FAX ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

John G. Butler, III, Respondents' Counsel SANDS ANDERSON PC Bank ofAmerica Center 1111 East Main Street, Suite 2400 Richmond, VA 23219 TEL: 804-648-1636 FAX:. 804-783;.7291 Whit Baldwin, President Heloair, Inc., 5721 Gulfstream Road Richmond, VA 23250 TEL: 804-226-3400 

### ONE COPY

Zachery M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AEA-7 Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 · TEL: 718-553-3258

. FAX: 718-995-5699

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310)
· Washington, DC 20590

TEL: 202-366.:2132 FAX: 202-366-7536
1For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal AviationAdministration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Heating Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### **CHAPTER 6—THE ANALYSIS OF REGULATORY FUNCTIONS**

Sec.
601.
Definitions.
602.
Regulatory agenda.
603.
Initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
604.
Final regulatory flexibility analysis.
605.
Avoidance of duplicative or unnecessary analyses.
606.
Effect on other law.
607.
Preparation of analyses.
608.
Procedure for waiver or delay of completion.
609.
Procedures for gathering comments.
610.
Periodic review of rules.
611.
Judicial review.
612.
Reports and intervention rights.
§ 1802.23 Response by originator(s) and/or any interested party. ( a ) *In general.* The originator of the classified information (document) is a required party to any challenge; other interested parties may become involved through the request of the Director, NACIC or the originator when it is determined that some or all of the information is also within their official cognizance.
( b ) *Determination.* These parties shall respond in writing to the Director, NACIC with a mandatory unclassified finding, to the greatest extent possible, and an optional classified addendum. This finding shall agree to a declassification or, in specific and factual terms, explain the basis for continued classification including identification of the category of information, the harm to national security which could be expected to result from disclosure, and, if older than ten (10) years, the basis for the extension of classification time under §§ 1.6 and 3.4 of this Order. These parties shall also provide a statement as to whether or not there is any other statutory, common law, or Constitutional basis for withholding as required by § 6.1(c) of this Order.
( c ) *Time.* The determination(s) shall be provided on a first in, first out basis with respect to all challenges pending under this section and shall be accomplished expeditiously taking into account the requirements of the authorized holder as well as the business requirements of the originator including their responsibilities under the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act, or the mandatory declassification review provisions of this Order.