alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a  14(a)/15d  14(a) Certification

of the Chief Executive Officer



I, James R. Bazet, certify that:



1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2005 |  | /s/ James R. Bazet           
|                      |  | James R. Bazet               
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
### Subdivision 1—General Provisions
#### PEOPLE ex rel. MADDEN, Relator, v. PARTRIDGE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people, on the-relation of Joseph J. Madden, against John J. Partridge.

B. F. Feiner, for relator.

T. Farley, for respondent.

No opinion. Writ dismissed, and proceedings affirmed, with costs.
### §44928. Honor Flight program

The Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration shall establish, in collaboration with the Honor Flight Network or other not-for-profit organization that honors veterans, a process for providing expedited and dignified passenger screening services for veterans traveling on an Honor Flight Network private charter, or such other not-for-profit organization that honors veterans, to visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor the service of such veterans.

(Added Pub. L. 113–221, §2(a), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2094.)
# C_2012138EN.01002101.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/21

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Strobl v Commission

(Case F-56/05) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Appointment - Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Grading under the new, less favourable rules - Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Protection of legitimate expectations - Principle of equality - Age discrimination)

(2012/C 138/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Peter Strobl (Greifenberg-Beuern, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Rüber, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents, and subsequently by J. Currall, Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Simm et I. Šulce, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Commission’s decision classifying the applicant, who was placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations, under the less favourable provisions of those regulations (Article 12 of Annex XIII to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials)

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union, the intervener, to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union, the intervener, to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 229, 17.9.2005, p. 28 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under the Number T-260/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

---
### §5706. Allowable travel expenses

Except as otherwise permitted by this subchapter or by statutes relating to members of the uniformed services, only actual and necessary travel expenses may be allowed to an individual holding employment or appointment under the United States.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 500.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 839. | June 9, 1949, ch. 185, §6, 63 Stat. 167. |

Statutes at Large

The words "members of the uniformed services" are substituted for "military personnel".

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
#### § 2001.10 Classification standards.

*Identifying or describing damage to the national security.* Section 1.1(a) of the Order specifies the conditions that must be met when making classification decisions. Section 1.4 specifies that information shall not be considered for classification unless its unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause identifiable or describable damage to the national security. There is no requirement, at the time of the decision, for the original classification authority to prepare a written description of such damage. However, the original classification authority must be able to support the decision in writing, including identifying or describing the damage, should the classification decision become the subject of a challenge or access demand pursuant to the Order or law.
EXHIBIT 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                       TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                     WESTERN INTERNATIONAL PIZZA CORPORATION

         The undersigned, Todd Albiston, President of Western International
Pizza Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby
certify:

                                        I

         Pursuant to the provisions of sections 78.320 and 78.315of the Nevada
Revised Statutes, the undersigned Corporation hereby adopts the following
Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation.

         ARTICLE 1. NAME OF THE CORPORATION: The name of the corporation shall
remain

Western International Pizza Corporation; and,

         The Board of Directors is authorized to file an amendment to the
company's Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the company to a name
that conforms with the business or industry that the Board of Directors
determines to engage in or conform with the name or names of any properties or
businesses acquired by the company.

         ARTICLE 4. AUTHORIZATION OF CAPITAL STOCK:

         Reverse split of the company's common stock on a basis of one for
two-thousand reverse split of the outstanding common stock of the company, while
retaining the par value of $0.001, with appropriate adjustments in its capital
accounts. The reverse split will be effective as of May 6, 2002.

                  Leaving all other provisions of article 4 the same.

                                       II

         The amendments setting forth the reverse split and authority to change
to company's name was adopted by unanimous vote of the Board of Directors and
stockholders owing in excess of a majority of outstanding voting securities of
the corporation by unanimous written consent pursuant to section 78.320 and
73.315 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, as follows:

         The designation and number of outstanding shares of each class entitled
to vote thereon as a class were as follows, to-wit:

<PAGE>

                           CLASS                     NUMBER OF SHARES
                           -----                     ----------------
                           Common                    397,500,000

(a) The number of shares voted for the two thousand to one reverse split was
212,637,814, with 54,500 abstaining and 10,000 opposing.
(b) The number of shares voted for the amendment to change the name of the
corporation was 212,673,314, with none opposing and 29,000 abstaining.

         IN WITNESS THEREOF, the undersigned officer of the corporation,
         certifying that the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of
         perjury, have set his hand this 29 day of April 2002.


                                     /s/ Todd Albiston
                                    ------------------------
                                    Todd Albiston, President
# FORM
6-K

SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

# Report of
Foreign Issuer

# Pursuant to
Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of

# Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

For the month
of June 2005

ABBEY NATIONAL
PLC (Translation of registrant's name into English)

Abbey National
House, 2 Triton Square, Regent's PlaceLondon NW1 3AN, England
   (Address of principal executive offices)

|Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
      under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . . Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
      contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
      Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934.  Yes . . . . . . . No . . .X. .
.. .


---



15 June 2005



Abbey National plc ("Abbey")



Abbey Board Change



Abbey announces today that Tony Wyatt, Executive Director, Manufacturing has resigned from the Abbey Board and will leave the company with effect 30thJune 2005.



Juan Olaizola, who has been working on the integration of Abbey into Santander (Banco Santander Central Hispano, S.A.), will take on management responsibility for the Manufacturing division.



The above is subject to appropriate FSA approval.









---

# SIGNATURES

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.

|                              |  | **ABBEY NATIONAL
      PLC**
|----------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|**Date:
     15th June 2005** |  | **By: /s/ Jason Wright**    
|                              |  | **(Authorized Signatory)**
EXHIBIT 32
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2007
the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: January 27, 2009
    By:
    /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBSAndrew F. JacobsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: January 27, 2009
    By:
    /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCHPhillip A. ReinschExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
### §8108. Reduction of compensation for subsequent injury to same member

The period of compensation payable under the schedule in section 8107(c) of this title is reduced by the period of compensation paid or payable under the schedule for an earlier injury if—

(1) compensation in both cases is for disability of the same member or function or different parts of the same member or function or for disfigurement; and

(2) the Secretary of Labor finds that compensation payable for the later disability in whole or in part would duplicate the compensation payable for the preexisting disability.

In such a case, compensation for disability continuing after the scheduled period starts on expiration of that period as reduced under this section.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 538; Pub. L. 90–83, §1(51), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 210.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 755(c). | Oct. 14, 1949, ch. 691, §104 "Sec. 5(c)", 63 Stat. 857. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

| Section of title 5 | Source (U.S.Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8108 | 5 App.: 755(c). | July 4, 1966, Pub. L. 89–488, §2(c), 80 Stat. 252. |

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Personnel Not Affected by 1967 Increase

Increases authorized under amendment by Pub. L. 90–83 not applicable to specified personnel, see section 7 of Pub. L. 90–83, set out as a note under section 8103 of this title.
§ 795.7 Filing for assistance. Each application for assistance shall include the following information: ( a ) A statement of the operator's intent to file a permit application.
( b ) The names and addresses of— ( 1 ) The permit applicant; and
( 2 ) The operator if different from the applicant.
( c ) A schedule of the estimated total production of coal from the proposed permit area and all other locations from which production is attributed to the applicant under § 795.6 The schedule shall include for each location— ( 1 ) The operator or company name under which coal is or will be mined;
( 2 ) The permit number and Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) number;
( 3 ) The actual coal production during the year preceding the year for which the applicant applies for assistance and production that may be attributed to the applicant under § 795.6; and
( 4 ) The estimated coal production and any production which may be attributed to the applicant for each year of the proposed permit.
( d ) A description of— ( 1 ) The proposed method of coal mining;
( 2 ) The anticipated starting and termination dates of mining operations;
( 3 ) The number of acres of land to be affected by the proposed mining operation; and
( 4 ) A general statement on the probable depth and thickness of the coal resource including a statement of reserves in the permit area and the method by which they were calculated.
( e ) A U.S. Geological Survey topographic map at a scale of 1:24,000 or larger or other topographic map of equivalent detail which clearly shows— ( 1 ) The area of land to be affected;
( 2 ) The location of any existing or proposed test borings; and
( 3 ) The location and extent of known workings of any underground mines.
( f ) Copies of documents which show that— ( 1 ) The applicant has a legal right to enter and commence mining within the permit area; and
( 2 ) A legal right of entry has been obtained for the program administrator and laboratory personnel to inspect the lands to be mined and adjacent areas to collect environmental data or to install necessary instruments.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 12-31

                           THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three                    Year Ended December 31
                                                              Months         ------------------------------------------
                                                               Ended
                                                              3/31/01         2000           1999            1998
                                                              -------         ----           ----            ----

                                                                       (Millions, except for ratio)

<S>                                                           <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Net income ...........................................        $113            $411            $434            $418
                                                              ----            ----            ----            ----

Taxes based on income:
   Income taxes ......................................          54             172             211             260
   Municipal and state ...............................           1               3               3               3
                                                              ----            ----            ----            ----
     Total taxes based on income .....................          55             175             214             263
                                                              ----            ----            ----            ----

Fixed charges:
   Interest on long-term debt ........................          66             245             252             254
   Amortization of debt discount, premium
     and expense .....................................           2              10              17              11
   Other interest ....................................           3              22              19              13
   Interest factor of rents ..........................           9              34              34              34
                                                              ----            ----            ----            ----
     Total fixed charges .............................          80             311             322             312
                                                              ====            ====            ====            ====

Earnings before taxes based on income
   and fixed charges .................................        $248            $897            $970            $993
                                                              ====            ====            ====            ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...................        3.10            2.88            3.01            3.18
</TABLE>
#### BRILL v. NOEKETT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Landlord and Tenant—Summary Proceedings—Evidence.

Where, in a summary proceeding by a landlord against his tenant, the allegation of the petition that a certain amount of rent was due was denied by a verified answer, judgment for plaintiff, without any evidence that any rent was due, was erroneous.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. , ;,

Summary proceedings by Max'Brill against’William S.. Norlcett to recover possession of certain premises belonging to plaintiff. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

A. S. Gilbert, for appellant.

William G. McCrea, for respondent.

MacLEAN, J.

Upon a verified petition alleging three months’ rent due and owing, and demand therefor, and upon a verified answer denying each and every allegation in said petition contained, except “that on or about the 9th day of March, 1903, one Max Brill demanded of this tenant the sum of five hundred dollars,” the trial justice, without any evidence that the rent claimed in the petition or any rent was due, rendered judgment by final order in favor of the landlord, awarding him.possession of the premises for nonpayment of rent. The final order must • therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Final order reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.