alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Rene R. Westlake, Respondent, v. Frank B. Emmick, Doing Business as Emmick Motor Company, et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from an award of death benefits. The decedent was an automobile salesman, spending part of his time in the salesroom and the remainder calling upon prospective customers. He was furnished a “demonstrator” automobile which he kept at his home and used for business and personal reasons. On August 28, 1958, he left his home intending later to meet a prospective customer at the employer’s place of business and to perform a personal errand. After performing both missions and while on his way home, he suffered a coronary attack, lost control of his automobile and sustained fatal injuries. In the automobile he had a salesbook and literature concerning both new and used automobiles. The appellants contend that the death of the decedent did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. The evidence supports the finding of the board that the deceased, at the time of his death, was engaged in the employer’s business and that any personal mission was incidental to such employment and did not alter the relationship of employer and employee. *(Matter of Perlmutter*v. *Duchess Hosiery Corp.,*5 A D 2d 912; *Matter of Cliff*v. *Dover Motors,*11 A D 2d 883, affd. 9 N Y 2d 891; *Matter of Mahoney*v. *Michaels Stern & Co.,*9 N Y 2d 931.) Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with one hill of costs to respondents filing briefs. Present—Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
R2 = 0.7016

100120140160180200

ehyde Emissions (ppm@ 3% O2)

Chart H‐1a: Reported Formaldehyde Emissions vs. Reported C

Emissions ‐ All Data

R2 = 0.0224

0

20406080

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000

Reported Formald

Reported Carbon Monoxide Emissions (ppm @ 3% O2)
5

6789

10

ehyde Emissions (ppm@ 3% O2)

Chart H‐1b: Reported Formaldehyde Emissions vs. Reported C

Emissions ‐ All Data

R2 = 0.0097 R2 = 0.0606 R2 = 0.0351

R2 = 0.1217

01234

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Reported Formald

Reported Carbon Monoxide Emissions (ppm @ 3% O2)
5

6789

10

ehyde Emissions (ppm@ 3% O2)

Chart H‐1c: Reported Formaldehyde Emissions vs. Reported C

Emissions ‐ All Data 0 to 1000 ppm CO @ 3% O2 (Quadratic

Minimum Values on Quadratic

Polynomial Regression Line:Formaldehyde: 0.1619 ppm @ 3% O2

CO: 206 ppm @ 3% O2

y = 3E‐06x2 ‐ 0.0012x + 0.2828

R2 = 0.1095

01234

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Reported Formald

Reported Carbon Monoxide Emissions (ppm @ 3% O2)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury United States Mint
 AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing pricing for the new United States Mint numismatic product in accordance with the table below: Product
2020 retail pricePresidential $1 Coin & First Spouse Medal Set
                            TM
                            -George H.W. Bush and Barbara Bush
$25.00
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Hicks, Marketing Specialist, Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street, NW; Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7750. Authority:
                        31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, & 9701. Eric Anderson, Executive Secretary, United States Mint.


[FR Doc. 2020-28051 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810-37-P
#### J. Koven and Doris Koven, trading as J. Koven & Company, appellees, v. Superior Crib & Novelty Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,624.

Motion to vacate judgment entered by default. Motion denied. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Philip J. Finnegan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 11, 1925.

Rehearing denied May 25, 1925.

Vincent G. Gallagher and Shulman, Shulman & Abrams, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 57.4532 Blacksmith shops. Blacksmith shops located on the surface shall be— ( a ) At least 100 feet from fan installations used for intake air and mine openings;
( b ) Equipped with exhaust vents over the forge and ventilated to prevent the accumulation of the products of combustion; and
( c ) Inspected for smoldering fires at the end of each shift.
### §403f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403f, comprising section 5 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, act June 20, 1949, ch. 227, was editorially reclassified as section 3506 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simon Property Group, L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

/s/ DAVID SIMON David Simon
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General PartnerDate: August 6, 2010/s/ STEPHEN E. STERRETT Stephen E. Sterrett
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General PartnerDate: August 6, 2010


38

---
#### § 903.819 Special performance standards—Auger mining.

Part 819 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Auger Mining,* applies to any person who conducts surface coal mining operations that include auger mining.
### §4041. Enforcement by the Attorney General

#### (a) Civil action

The Attorney General may commence a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against any person who—

(1) engages in a pattern or practice of violating this chapter; or

(2) engages in a violation of this chapter that raises an issue of significant public importance.

#### (b) Relief

In a civil action commenced under subsection (a), the court may—

(1) grant any appropriate equitable or declaratory relief with respect to the violation of this chapter;

(2) award all other appropriate relief, including monetary damages, to any person aggrieved by the violation; and

(3) may, to vindicate the public interest, assess a civil penalty—

(A) in an amount not exceeding $55,000 for a first violation; and

(B) in an amount not exceeding $110,000 for any subsequent violation.

#### (c) Intervention

Upon timely application, a person aggrieved by a violation of this chapter with respect to which the civil action is commenced may intervene in such action, and may obtain such appropriate relief as the person could obtain in a civil action under section 4042 of this title with respect to that violation, along with costs and a reasonable attorney fee.

(Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, title VIII, §801, as added Pub. L. 111–275, title III, §303(a), Oct. 13, 2010, 124 Stat. 2877.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 597 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 50.1 Purpose and scope.

This part 50 implements sections 103(e) and 111 of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, 30 U.S.C. 801 *et seq.,* and sections 4 and 13 of the Federal Metal and Nonmetallic Mine Safety Act, 30 U.S.C. 721 *et seq.,* and applies to operators of coal, metal, and nonmetallic mines. It requires operators to immediately notify the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) of accidents, requires operators to investigate accidents, and restricts disturbance of accident related areas. This part also requires operators to file reports pertaining to accidents, occupational injuries and occupational illnesses, as well as employment and coal production data, with MSHA, and requires operators to maintain copies of reports at relevant mine offices. The purpose of this part is to implement MSHA's authority to investigate, and to obtain and utilize information pertaining to, accidents, injuries, and illnesses occurring or originating in mines. In utilizing information received under part 50, MSHA will develop rates of injury occurrence (incident rates or IR), on the basis of 200,000 hours of employee exposure (equivalent to 100 employees working 2,000 hours per year). The incidence rate for a particular injury category will be based on the formula:

IR = (number of cases × 200,000) divided by hours of employee exposure.

MSHA will develop data respecting injury severity using days away from work or days of restricted work activity and the 200,000 hour base as criteria. The severity measure (SM) for a particular injury category will be based on the formula:

SM = (sum of days × 200,000) divided by hours of employee exposure.

[42 FR 65535, Dec. 30, 1977; 43 FR 1617, Jan. 11, 1978, as amended at 43 FR 12318, Mar. 24, 1978; 71 FR 16666, Apr. 3, 2006]
#### Edward Von Gerichten, Appellant, v. Joseph W. Erlwein, Respondent.

In an action under article 15 of the Real Property Law for a determination that a tax deed held by the defendant is subject to plaintiff’s right to redeem, the plaintiff appeals: (1) from an order and judgment (one paper) of the County Court, Nassau County, entered April 26, 1962, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and awarded other relief to the defendant; and (2) from an order of said *755court, dated May 4, 1962, made upon plaintiff’s motion for reargument, which adhered to the original determination. Order of May 4, 1962, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (cf. *Matter of Valley Stream Lawns*v. *Seaman,*281 App. Div. 1034, mot. for iv. to opp. den. 282 App. Div. 841, 306 N. Y. 982; *Long Is. Research Bureau*v. *Town of Hempstead,*283 App. Div. 663, affd. 308 Y. Y. 818). Appeal from order of April 26, 1962 dismissed, as academic; that order was superseded by the later order granting reargument. [For prior appeals relating to this action, see 7 A D 2d 650, 8 A D 2d 616, 11 A D 2d 744.] Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### §2351. National coordinator on nonproliferation

#### (a) Designation of position

The President shall designate an individual to serve in the Executive Office of the President as the National Coordinator for Nonproliferation Matters.

#### (b) Duties

The Coordinator, under the direction of the National Security Council, shall advise and assist the President by—

(1) advising the President on nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction, including issues related to terrorism, arms control, and international organized crime;

(2) chairing the Committee on Nonproliferation of the National Security Council; and

(3) taking such actions as are necessary to ensure that there is appropriate emphasis in, cooperation on, and coordination of, nonproliferation research efforts of the United States, including activities of Federal agencies as well as activities of contractors funded by the Federal Government.

#### (c) Allocation of funds

Of the total amount authorized to be appropriated under section 301,1 $2,000,000 is available to the Department of Defense for carrying out research referred to in subsection (b)(3).

(Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XIV, §1441, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2727; Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1069(c)(2), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2136.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 301, referred to in subsec. (c), is section 301 of Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title III, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2475, which is not classified to the Code.

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 105–261 substituted "of the National Security Council" for "established under section 1342".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Commission To Assess Organization of Federal Government To Combat Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction

Pub. L. 104–293, title VII, subtitle A, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3470, as amended by Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VII, §708], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–390, established the Commission to Assess the Organization of the Federal Government to Combat the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, directed the Commission to carry out a thorough study of the organization of the Federal Government, including the elements of the intelligence community, with respect to combatting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and, not later than 18 months after Jan. 18, 1998, to submit to Congress a report containing a detailed statement of its findings and conclusions, and provided that the Commission terminate 60 days after the date on which it submitted such report.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### PIERCE, Appellant, v. SEABURY et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 1, 1905.)

Action by Emma A. Pierce against Adelaide O. Seabury and another. No opinion. Appeal dismissed, upon stipulation, with costs of the appeal to the respondents.
### §2623. River Protection Project

The tank waste remediation system environmental project, Richland, Washington, including all programs relating to the retrieval and treatment of tank waste at the site at Hanford, Washington, under the management of the Office of River Protection, shall be known and designated as the "River Protection Project". Any reference to that project in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the River Protection Project.

(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIV, §4443, formerly Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXI, §3141(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–462; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLIV, §4443, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(g)(18), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1768.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–136, §3141(g)(18)(C), inserted section catchline and struck out former subsec. heading.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Parker Bartlett, Appellant.

Motion to prosecute appeal as a poor person, and for other relief, denied on the ground that the papers fail to show merit to the appeal. It clearly appears from the face of the petition that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief in question.
Editorial Note on Part 784
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 784 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 784.17 Protection of publicly owned parks and historic places. ( a ) For any publicly owned parks or any places listed on the National Register of Historic Places that may be adversely affected by the proposed operation, each plan shall describe the measures to be used. ( 1 ) To prevent adverse impacts, or
( 2 ) If a person has valid existing rights, as determined under § 761.16 of this chapter, or if joint agency approval is to be obtained under § 761.17(d) of this chapter, to minimize adverse impacts.
( b ) The regulatory authority may require the applicant to protect historic and archeological properties listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places through appropriate mitigation and treatment measures. Appropriate mitigation and treatment measures may be required to be taken after permit issuance provided that the required measures are completed before the properties are affected by any mining operation.
[52 FR 4263, Feb. 10, 1987, as amended at 64 FR 70838, Dec. 17, 1999; 81 FR 93355, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54958, Nov. 17, 2017]
Order entered March 3, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00138
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF T .J.S., A CHILD On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 14
- 15124



### O RDE R On February 27, 2015, appellant filed a motion asking this Court to review the trial court’s February 19, 2015 order sustaining the contest to his affidavit of indigence. A supplemental clerk’s record was filed on March 2, 2015 containing the trial cou rt’s order sustaining the contest. However, the contest to the affidavit of indigence was not included in the supplemental clerk’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER Felicia Pitre to file, by MARCH 4 , 2015 , a supplemental clerk’s record containing the contest filed on February 10, 2015 by Francheska Duffey, Official Court Reporter for the 330th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1(j)(3).
We ORDER Francheska Duffey to file, by 3:00 P.M. on MARCH 5 , 2015 , the reporter’s reco rd from the hearing on the contest held on February 19, 2015. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1(j)(3).We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic

transmission to the Honorable Andrea Plumlee, Judge of the 330th Judicial District C ourt, Felicia Pitre, Francheska Duffey, appellant, and counsel for appellee.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### § 77.200 Surface installations; general.

All mine structures, enclosures, or other facilities (including custom coal preparation) shall be maintained in good repair to prevent accidents and injuries to employees.
#### COLFORD, Appellant, v. HUDSON VALLEY RY. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by Sarah Colford against the Hudson Valley Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 99.2


                                   FC Partners



December 5, 2005



Mr. Ron Duncan, President
General Communication, Inc.
2550 Denali - Suite 1000
Anchorage, AK 99503

Dear Ron:

I hereby submit my resignation as a Director of General Communication, Inc.
effectively immediately. In addition, I resign as an officer and director of all
subsidiaries of General Communication, Inc.

Thanks for your support.

Best regards,


/s/
Donne F. Fisher

DFF/brh













                          Fisher Capital Partners, Ltd.
            5619 DTC Parkway, Suite 1150 Greenwood Village, CO 80111
§ 947.780 Surface mining permit application—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan. ( a ) Part 780 of this chapter, *Surface Mining Permit Application—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations, except for § 780.15(a) of that part.
( b ) Any applicant for a surface coal mining permit which is to produce more than 1,000,000 tons per year shall demonstrate compliance with local Air Pollution Control Authorities and the Washington Clean Air Act, RCW 70.94.
( c ) Any applicant for a surface mining permit shall describe the steps taken to comply with the Washington Water Pollution Control Act, RCW 90.48.
[48 FR 7883, Feb. 24, 1983, as amended at 48 FR 22292, May 18, 1983]
#### § 922.955 Certification of blasters.

Part 955 of this chapter, *Certification of Blasters in Federal Program States and on Indian Lands,* shall apply to the training, examination and certification of blasters for surface coal mining and reclamation operations.

[51 FR 19462, May 29, 1986]
#### § 582.31 [Reserved]
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
NCO Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. To the best of his knowledge, the undersigned, Michael J. Barrist, Chief
Executive Officer, hereby certifies that:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


/s/ Michael J. Barrist
----------------------
Chief Executive Officer


Date: 11/14/02
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Constar
International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William S. Rymer, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/  WILLIAM S. RYMER                               
|William S. Rymer                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    



November 9, 2005
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00125-CV

GL LOGISTICS CO., LLC,

Appellant

v.

Erika FLORES and Christian Flores,

Appellees

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CVA000265D4 

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s temporary injunction 

order signed on March 16, 2021 is AFFIRMED. 

It is ORDERED that appellant shall pay the appellees’ costs of appeal.

SIGNED August 31, 2021.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice