alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023273EN.01000401.xml

| 2.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/4

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2023/C 273/04)

1.

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

| 4. | This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









  Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain organic coated steel products | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/687 of 2 May 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain organic coated steel products originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 116, 3.5.2019, p. 5) | 4.5.2024 |

4.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain organic coated steel products

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/687 of 2 May 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain organic coated steel products originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 116, 3.5.2019, p. 5)

4.5.2024

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
§ 874.13 Reclamation objectives and priorities. ( a ) When you conduct reclamation projects under this part you may follow OSM's “Final Guidelines for Reclamation Programs and Projects” (66 FR 31250, June 11, 2001) and the expenditures must reflect the following priorities in the order stated: ( 1 ) *Priority 1:* The protection of public health, safety, and property from extreme danger of adverse effects of coal mining practices, including the restoration of land and water resources and the environment that: ( i ) Have been degraded by the adverse effects of coal mining practices; and
( ii ) Are adjacent to a site that has been or will be addressed to protect the public health, safety, and property from extreme danger of adverse effects of coal mining practices.
( 2 ) *Priority 2:* The protection of public health and safety from adverse effects of coal mining practices, including the restoration of land and water resources and the environment that: ( i ) Have been degraded by the adverse effects of coal mining practices; and
( ii ) Are adjacent to a site that has been or will be addressed to protect the public health and safety from adverse effects of coal mining practices.
( 3 ) *Priority 3:* The restoration of land and water resources and the environment previously degraded by adverse effects of coal mining practices, including measures for the conservation and development of soil, water (excluding channelization), woodland, fish and wildlife, recreation resources, and agricultural productivity. Priority 3 land and water resources that are geographically contiguous with existing or remediated Priority 1 or 2 problems will be considered adjacent under paragraphs (a)(1)(ii) or (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
( b ) This paragraph applies to State or Tribal share funds available under §§ 872.14 and 872.17 of this chapter and historic coal funds available under § 872.21 of this chapter. You may expend these funds to reclaim Priority 3 lands and waters, if either of the following conditions applies: ( 1 ) You have completed all of the Priority 1 and Priority 2 reclamation in the jurisdiction of your State or Indian tribe; or
( 2 ) The expenditure for Priority 3 reclamation is made in conjunction with the expenditure of funds for Priority 1 or Priority 2 reclamation projects including past, current, and future Priority 1 or Priority 2 reclamation projects. Expenditures under this paragraph must either: ( i ) Facilitate the Priority 1 or Priority 2 reclamation; or
( ii ) Provide reasonable savings towards the objective of reclaiming all Priority 3 land and water problems within the jurisdiction of your State or Indian tribe.
[73 FR 67639, Nov. 14, 2008]
#### § 148.6 Agency review.

Agencies will continue to review and assess the potential value added to the process of co-use of facilities by development of electronic data retrieval across government. As this review continues, agencies creating or modifying facilities databases will do so in a manner which facilitates community data sharing, interest of national defense or foreign policy.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Billie Marshall Thompson, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Queens County, rendered February 20, 1961 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him as a second felony offender. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. No questions of fact were considered. On the trial two police officers were permitted, without *706objection, to testify to a previous identification of defendant by the complaining witness. Under the circumstances disclosed by this record, the admission of the prejudicial hearsay testimony as to the previous identification requires reversal in the interests of justice, even though no exception was taken by defendant’s counsel *(People*v. *Trowbridge,*305 N. Y. 471; *People*v. *Altintop,*13 A D 2d 508; People v. De Jesus, 11 A D 2d 711). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 996 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 996

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Dr. Rudy 
                         Lombard Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. RUDY LOMBARD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dr. Rudy Lombard Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Rudy 
Lombard Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 996

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Dr. Rudy 
                         Lombard Post Office''.
```
#### WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT CO. v. KERLIN.

No. 11829.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 10, 1954.

Decided April 1, 1954.

Mr. John J. Wilson, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Roger J. White-ford, W. E. Gallagher, and Duane G. Derrick, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant. .

Mr. Samuel Intrater, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Albert Brick, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for ap-pellee.

Before BAZELON, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

 The principal ground urged by appellant for reversal of the judgment rendered against it for personal injuries to appellee is that the trial court erred in submitting the case to the jury under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. We think this was not error for the reasons cited by the trial court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, etc.1 And since we do not agree with appellant’s additional contention that there was insufficient evidence that the alleged events were the proximate cause of appellee’s total deafness, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

1

. Kerlin v. Washington Gas Light Co., D.C.D.C.1953, 110 F.Supp. 487.
#### MOREL et al. v. STEARNS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

1. Directing Verdict—Conflicting Evidence.

Where the evidence on the issues in a case is conflicting, it is error for the court to direct a verdict.

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term.

Action by Marie J. E. Morel and others against John N. Stearns and others. From a judgment entered on a directed verdict in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Hector M. Hitchings, for appellants.

Carlisle Norwood, for respondents.

BISCHOFF, J.

Nothing in the opinion of this court upon the former appeal (37 Misc. Rep. 486, 75 N. Y. Supp. 1082) justified the direction of a verdict for the plaintiffs upon the facts in evidence. The question whether the delivery was in time, under the contract between the parties, depended upon the terms of the agreement, construed in accordance with a course of dealing, and the earlier appeal, from a judgment upon a verdict directed for the defendants, involved the question whether the evidence sufficed to show the plaintiffs’ performance in the matter of the delivery. The nature of the appeal—a verdict having been directed—presented a case to this court for determination upon evidence taken in the most favorable aspect to the appellants, and the discussion of the facts leading to a reversal proceeded, of course, on this theory. Whether the course of dealing justified this particular delivery, and whether the defendants’ failure to facilitate the delivery in accordance with the course of dealing placed them in default, involved a question of fact, not of law, for the purposes of the trial; and it was for the jury to determine the intent of the parties, as gathered from their course of dealing, and to say whether the defendants’ acts in the matter of response to the notice of arrival were or were not of a character to excuse the late delivery, under the true construction of the contract.

There was a conflict of facts upon the question of the receipt of notice by the defendants, as well as a conflict of inferences as to the intention of the parties touching the manner of deliveries, and the direction of a verdict over the appellants’ request to submit the case to the jury was error.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. All concur.
### §§551 to 556. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 551, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 108, defined terms used in this chapter. See sections 101 and 801 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 552, acts May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 109; Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 852, §23, 70 Stat. 911, related to persons subject to Articles of War. See section 802 of Title 10. Act Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 852, §23, 70 Stat. 911 was repealed by Pub. L. 87–651, title III, §307A, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 526.

Section 553, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 109, related to jurisdiction to try certain personnel. See section 803 of Title 10.

Section 554, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 110, provided for dismissed officer's right to trial by court-martial. See section 804 of Title 10.

Section 555, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 110, provided that this chapter should be applicable in all places. See section 805 of Title 10.

Section 556, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 110, related to judge advocates and legal officers. See section 806 of Title 10.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1957, see act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53 footnote, 70A Stat. 680.
#### CAMA, Appellant, v. SOCIETA DI MUTUO SOCCORSO REGGIO VILLA, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 11, 1903.)

Action by Guiseppe Cama against Societa _ Di Mutuo Soecorso Reggio Villa.

_ No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
J.

violations. Because the claims are belied by the record, we conclude they lack merit, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge Humboldt County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Humboldt County District Attorney Humboldt County Clerk

'The fast track statement does not comply with the provisions of NRAP 32(a)(4) because it does not have margins of at least one inch on all four sides. 

### See NRAP 3C(h)(1) (requiring fast track filings to comply with the provisions of NRAP 32(a)(4)-(6)). We caution appellant's counsel that future failure to comply with the rules when filing briefs may result in the imposition of sanctions. 

### See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) I947A
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1403-6 Criteria—Self-propelled personnel carriers. ( a ) Each self-propelled personnel carrier should: ( 1 ) Be provided with an audible warning device;
( 2 ) Be provided with a sealed-beam headlight, or its equivalent, on each end;
( 3 ) Be provided with reflectors on both ends and sides.
( b ) In addition, each track-mounted self-propelled personnel carrier should: ( 1 ) Be provided with a suitable lifting jack and bar, which shall be secured or carried in a tool compartment;
( 2 ) Be equipped with 2 separate and independent braking systems properly installed and well maintained;
( 3 ) Be equipped with properly installed and well-maintained sanding devices, except that personnel carriers (jitneys), which transport not more than 5 men, need not be equipped with such sanding device;
( 4 ) If an open type, be equipped with guards of sufficient strength and height to prevent personnel from being thrown from such carriers.
#### § 942.777 General content requirements for permit applications.

Part 777 of this chapter, *General Content Requirements for Permit Applications,* shall apply to any person who makes application for a permit to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1728 Power-driven pulleys. ( a ) Belts, chains, and ropes shall not be guided onto power-driven moving pulleys, sprockets, or drums with the hands except on slow-moving equipment especially designed for hand feeding.
( b ) Pulleys of conveyors shall not be cleaned manually while the conveyor is in motion.
( c ) Coal spilled beneath belt conveyor drives or tail pieces shall not be removed while the conveyor is in motion, except where such coal can be removed without endangering persons.
[38 FR 4976, Feb. 23, 1973]
#### Margaret B. Judson et al., Respondents, v. City of Rochester, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied. Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman and MeClusky, JJ.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Changes in Retail Prices of Electricity, 1923-38

              																	Powers, Ruth J.					 and 	Stewart, Stella, 1887-. 						*Changes in Retail Prices of Electricity, 1923-38 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 664*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										February 1939,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4172,			accessed on September 15, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
```

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83981-83982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28351]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; RFA DK20-003: Liver 
Cirrhosis Clinical Center Network.
    Date: February 11-12, 2021.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Najma S. Begum, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 7349, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 
594-8894, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

[[Page 83982]]

    Dated: _December 18, 2020.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-28351 Filed 12-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
§ 926.12 State program provisions and amendments not approved. ( a ) The amendment submitted by letter dated June 7, 2011, Docket ID No. OSM-2011-0011, which proposed changes to the Montana approved program as a result of the Montana Legislature's 2011 passage of a Senate Bill (SB 297) relating to coal beneficiation is not approved.
( b ) [Reserved]
[78 FR 10512, Feb. 14, 2013]
#### § 57.7055 Intersecting holes.

Holes shall not be drilled where there is a danger of intersecting a misfired hole or a hole containing explosives, blasting agents, or detonators.

[56 FR 46517, Sept. 12, 1991; 56 FR 52193, Oct. 18, 1991]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A. P.
Kimble, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 28, 2003                           /s/  A. P. Kimble
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             A. P. Kimble
                                             Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
                                             Financial and Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North
Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.