alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                      INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying condensed combined statement of financial
condition of DLJdirect (a combination of certain assets and liabilities as
described in note 1) as of March 31, 2000, and the related condensed combined
statements of income, changes in allocated equity and cash flows for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2000. These condensed combined financial
statements are the responsibility of the Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette,
Inc.'s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of the interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

We have also reviewed the condensed consolidated statement of financial
condition of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March
31, 20000, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2000, and have issued our report dated May 12, 2000. The
condensed combined financial statements of DLJdirect should be read in
conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements of
Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette, Inc. and subsidiaries.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the condensed combined financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.


/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
May 12, 2000
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 000300tp
- 00040000
- 0005r001
- 0006r002
- 00070001
- 00080002
- 00090003
- 00100004
- 00110005
- 00120006
- 00130007
- 00140008
- 00150009
- 00160010
- 00170011
- 00180012
- 00190013
- 00200014
- 00210015
- 00220016
- 00230017
- 00240018
- 00250019
- 00260020
- 00270021
- 00280022
- 00290023
- 00300024
- 00310025
- 00320026
- 00330027
- 00340028
- 00350029
- 00360030
- 00370031
- 00380032
- 00390000
- 00400000
- 00410000
- 00420000
- 00430000
- 00440000
- 004500bi
- 004600bc
#### In re WEISEL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

In the matter oí Walter Weisel. E. B. Goodman, ior appellant. J. Frankenheimer, for respondent. No opinion. Decree affirmed, with costs.
§ 850.14 Examination. ( a ) The regulatory authority shall ensure that candidates for blaster certification are examined by reviewing and verifying the— ( 1 ) Competence of persons directly responsible for the use of explosives in surface coal mining operations through a written examination in technical aspects of blasting and State and Federal laws governing the storage, use, and transportation of explosives; and
( 2 ) Practical field experience of the candidates as necessary to qualify a person to accept the responsibility for blasting operations in surface coal mining operations. Such experience shall demonstrate that the candidate possesses practical knowledge of blasting techniques, understands the hazards involved in the use of explosives, and otherwise has exhibited a pattern of conduct consistent with the acceptance of responsibility for blasting operations.
( b ) Applicants for blaster certification shall be examined, at a minimum, in the topics set forth in § 850.13(b).
#### § 912.775 Administrative and judicial review of decisions.

Part 775 of this chapter, *Administrative and Judicial Review of Decisions,* shall apply to all decisions on permits.

[52 FR 13808, Apr. 24, 1987]
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0145 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-SW-059-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 12JWZFN978

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### § 147.23 Breaks in service.

If a person who requires access has been retired or separated from U.S. government employment for less than two years and is the subject of an investigation that is otherwise current, the agency regranting the access will, as a minimum, review an updated Standard Form 86 and applicable records. A reinvestigation is not required unless the review indicates the person may no longer satisfy the standards of Executive Order 12968 (60 FR 40245, 3 CFR 1995 Comp., p. 391); (Attachment D to this subpart, Table 2).
### §102504. Review and approval

The Secretary shall ensure that museum objects are treated in a careful and deliberate manner that protects the public interest. Prior to taking any action under subsection (g), (h), or (i) of section 102503 of this title, the Secretary shall establish a systematic review and approval process, including consultation with appropriate experts, that meets the highest standards of the museum profession for all actions taken under those subsections.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3159.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 102504 | 16 U.S.C. 18f–2(b). | July 1, 1955, ch. 259, §(2)(b), as added Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §804(a)(2), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4188. |

Section
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Jackson, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 77]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J., at initial request for psychiatric examination; Edwin Torres, J., at subsequent request for psychiatric examination, jury trial and sentence), rendered February 26, 2004, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s requests to represent himself, which were equivocal since they were overshadowed by his numerous other applications *(see People v Payton,*45 NY2d 300, 314 [1978], *revd on other grounds*445 US 573 [1980]), and which were part of a course of conduct “calculated to undermine, upset or unreasonably delay the progress of the trial” *(People v McIntyre,*36 NY2d 10, 18 [1974]).

The respective courts properly denied defense counsel’s pretrial and midtrial requests that defendant be examined pursuant to CPL article 730 *(see People v Morgan,*87 NY2d 878 [1995]). In each instance, the court properly determined, on the basis of its own observations of defendant and the surrounding circumstances, that there was no indication that defendant was unable to understand the proceedings and assist in his defense. The fact that defendant “may have made meritless legal arguments and exhibited strange notions about criminal procedure does not establish that he was incompetent to stand trial” *(People v Stamps,*296 AD2d 325, 326 [2002], *lv denied*100 NY2d 543 [2003]).

Defendant’s constitutional challenge to the procedure under *395which he was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit *(see People v Rosen,*96 NY2d 329 [2001], *cert denied*534 US 899 [2001]; *Almendarez-Torres v United States,*523 US 224 [1998]).

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information restating the financial
statements previously filed on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001060515
<NAME> PARAGON CORPORATE HOLDINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,075
<SECURITIES>                                    16,222
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,451
<INVENTORY>                                     46,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,217
<PP&E>                                          23,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,689
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,840
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,857)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,429
<SALES>                                         87,254
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,254
<CGS>                                           64,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        52
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,693)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,217
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,476)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY   We, the undersigned directors of Questar Pipeline Company, hereby severally constitute R. Allan Bradley and Richard J. Doleshek, and each of them acting alone, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2009 and any and all amend­ments to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Questar Pipeline Company, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by the attorneys appointed herein to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2009 and any and all amendments to such Report.  Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.   Signature Title Date   __________/s/_______________ Chairman of the Board 02/09/10 Keith O. Rattie   __________/s/_______________ President and 02/09/10 R. Allan Bradley Chief Executive Officer   __________/s/_____________ Director 02/09/10 L. Richard Flury   _________/s/________________ Director 02/09/10 Robert E. McKee III   ________/s/_________________ Director 02/09/10 Gary G. Michael   ________/s/_________________ Director 02/09/10 Bruce A. Williamson    BOARD\MEETING\10\FEB 8-9\POA QPC.DOCX
#### § 900.15 Federal lands program cooperative agreements.

The full text of any State and Federal cooperative agreement for the regulation of coal exploration and mining on Federal lands is published below under the applicable part. In addition, those requirements of a State program which are applicable on Federal lands in the State shall be specified.
Editorial Note on Part 816
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 816 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 816.61 Use of explosives: General requirements. ( a ) Each operator shall comply with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations in the use of explosives.
( b ) Blasts that use more than 5 pounds of explosive or blasting agent shall be conducted according to the schedule required under § 816.64.
( c ) *Blasters.* ( 1 ) No later than 12 months after the blaster certification program for a State required by part 850 of this chapter has been approved under the procedures of subchapter C of this chapter, all blasting operations in that State shall be conducted under the direction of a certified blaster. Before that time, all such blasting operations in that State shall be conducted by competent, experienced persons who understand the hazards involved.
( 2 ) Certificates of blaster certification shall be carried by blasters or shall be on file at the permit area during blasting operations.
( 3 ) A blaster and at least one other person shall be present at the firing of a blast.
( 4 ) Any blaster who is responsible for conducting blasting operations at a blasting site shall: ( i ) Be familiar with the blasting plan and site-specific performance standards; and
( ii ) Give direction and on-the-job training to persons who are not certified and who are assigned to the blasting crew or assist in the use of explosives.
( d ) *Blast design.* ( 1 ) An anticipated blast design shall be submitted if blasting operations will be conducted within— ( i ) 1,000 feet of any building used as a dwelling, public building, school, church, or community or institutional building outside the permit area; or
( ii ) 500 feet of an active or abandoned underground mine.
( 2 ) The blast design may be presented as part of a permit application or at a time, before the blast, approved by the regulatory authority.
( 3 ) The blast design shall contain sketches of the drill patterns, delay periods, and decking and shall indicate the type and amount of explosives to be used, critical dimensions, and the location and general description of structures to be protected, as well as a discussion of design factors to be used, which protect the public and meet the applicable airblast, flyrock, and ground-vibration standards in § 816.67.
( 4 ) The blast design shall be prepared and signed by a certified blaster.
( 5 ) The regulatory authority may require changes to the design submitted.
[48 FR 9492, Mar. 4, 1983, and 48 FR 9806, Mar. 8, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 19461, May 29, 1986; 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017]
§ 905.842 Federal inspections. ( a ) Part 842 of this chapter, Federal Inspections, shall apply to all coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) In addition to the requirements of part 842, copies of inspection reports will be furnished, upon request, to the California Division of Mining and Geology.
§ 881.7 Administration of contributions. ( a ) The Government's contribution to a State will be made only pursuant to a cooperative agreement and only upon the basis of payments made, or that are then due and payable, by the State under a project contract between the State and its contractor for the construction, installation, services or work performed on individual projects and shall not exceed 75 percent of such amounts.
( b ) The State shall submit to the Director, not more often than once a month and for each cooperative agreement, a separate voucher which describes each payment made or that is due and payable by the State under a project contract. The amounts claimed under each voucher shall be certified by the State as proper charges under the project contract, and the State shall also certify that the amounts have either been paid or are due and payable thereunder. Insofar as the Government's contribution payments related to amounts due and payable rather than amounts already paid, the State shall disburse such funds together with the funds contributed by the State, promptly upon receipt from the Government.
( c ) The State shall maintain suitable records and accounts of its transactions with and payments to project contractors, and the Government may inspect and audit such accounts and records during normal business hours and as it may deem necessary.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-31109

ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BAYOU CONCESSION SALVAGE, INC, ET AL Defendants,

JOSE ANTONIO MORALES, SR, Individually and as administrator of the Estate of Antonio Morales Jr; CARMEN MORALES; EMILIA MORENO RAMIREZ, Individually and as next friend of Antonio Morales, III, a minor Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-3401)

August 8, 1997

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This appe al is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The

judgment below did not dispose of all the parties, and there is no

Rule 54(b) certificate. Appeal DISMISSED.2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of December 31, 1998 and from the statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         808,919
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  125,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      37,388,637
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,369,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,179,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     27,119,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,941,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,179,405
<SALES>                                      9,695,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,835,496
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,415,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,962,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                457,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            457,731
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   457,731
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The Partnership has an unclassified balance sheet; Therefore, the value is $0.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 1.8



                                    Autoriteit
                                    Financiet Markten
















Form for the disclosure of securities transactions
in the own issuing institution

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
Form for the disclosure of securities transactions in the own issuing institution



Part 1

<S>                                                               <C>
1.   Name of issuing institution:                                 New Skies Satellites N.V.

2.   Name of person obliged to notify:                            New Skies Satellites N.V.


Sort of security
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3.   Sort of security:                                            Ordinary shares

     (Share/Bond/Option/Warrant/other)

4.   To be filled out if applicable:

               Nominal value of the security:                     0.05 EUR

               Optional series (call option/put option):

               Exercise price:

               Expiration date:


Transaction in the security indicated in questions 3 and 4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


5.   Date of the transaction:                                     24-03-03

6a.  Number of securities acquired in the transaction:            1,684

 b.  Number of securities sold in the transaction:

7.   Price of the securities:                                     3.95EUR

8.   Open/Close (in case of options)











To the best of my knowledge and belief I certify that the information set forth
in this statement is true, complete and correct:


Mary J. Dent, General Counsel of New Skies Satellites N.V.,
-------------------------------------------------------------
Name

Rooseveltplantsoen 4                                              25 March 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------     -----------------------------
Address                                                           Date

2517 KR The Hague
-------------------------------------------------------------     -----------------------------
Postal code & city & country                                      Signature
</TABLE>