alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2023279EN.01000901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/9 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11197 – SCL / ETHIAS / ETHIAS LEASE JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 279/08)

1.

On 31 July 2023, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2023279EN.01000901-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Santander Consumer Leasing B.V. (‘SCL’) (The Netherlands), belonging to the Banco Santander Group, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Ethias NV/SA (‘Ethias’) (Belgium). |

SCL and Ethias will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Ethias Lease (‘the JV’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | SCL is a Dutch car leasing business of Santander Group, a Spanish-based financial services group, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Ethias is an insurer, offering a range of life and non-life insurance products, mostly active in Belgium. |

3.

The business activities of Ethias Lease will be the development and provision of operational leasing services for green electric vehicle (including insurance and assistance), and e-mobility solutions in the SME, corporate and public segments in Belgium, which shall operate as a multi-brand platform.

4.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2023279EN.01000901-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

5.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11197 – SCL / ETHIAS / ETHIAS LEASE JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2023279EN.01000901-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2023279EN.01000901-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,865,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               90,547,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,408,000
<INVENTORY>                                125,229,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           223,859,000
<PP&E>                                     107,686,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              36,159,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             320,289,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      184,407,000
<BONDS>                                    100,963,000
<COMMON>                                        48,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,282,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               320,289,000
<SALES>                                    130,511,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           130,511,000
<CGS>                                      115,204,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              115,204,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               257,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,524,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,693,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,693,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,693,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.99)

        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7638

VINCENT L. SIMMONS,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN TERRY O’BRIEN; UNITED STATES PAROLE

COMMISSION,

 Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (7:07-cv-00193-jlk)

Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 27, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent L. Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*Because Simmons was convicted in a District of Columbia

court, he is required to obtain a certificate of appealability in

order to appeal the denial of his § 2241 petition. See Madley v.

United States Parole Comm’n, 278 F.3d 1306 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Vincent L. Simmons, a District of Columbia prisoner,

seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.*

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the

district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive

procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record

and conclude that Simmons has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
### §4824. Annual report to Congress

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall submit to Congress, by December 31 of each year, a report on the implementation of this subchapter during the preceding fiscal year. The report shall include a review of—

(1) the effect of controls imposed under this subchapter on exports, reexports, and in-country transfers of items in addressing threats to the national security or foreign policy of the United States, including a description of licensing processing times;

(2) the impact of such controls on the scientific and technological leadership of the United States;

(3) the consistency with such controls of export controls imposed by other countries;

(4) efforts to provide exporters with compliance assistance, including specific actions to assist small- and medium-sized businesses;

(5) a summary of regulatory changes from the prior fiscal year;

(6) a summary of export enforcement actions, including of actions taken to implement end-use monitoring of dual-use, military, and other items subject to the Export Administration Regulations;

(7) a summary of approved license applications to proscribed persons;

(8) efforts undertaken within the previous year to comply with the requirements of section 4817 1 of this title, including any critical technologies identified under such section and how or whether such critical technologies were controlled for export; and

(9) a summary of industrial base assessments conducted during the previous year by the Department of Commerce, including with respect to counterfeit electronics, foundational technologies, and other research and analysis of critical technologies and industrial capabilities of key defense-related sectors.

#### (b) Form

The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.

(Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVII, §1765, Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2232.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this part", meaning part I (§§1751–1768) of subtitle B of title XVII of div. A of Pub. L. 115–232, known as the Export Controls Act of 2018, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of part I to the Code, see section 1751 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a Short Title note under section 4801 of this title and Tables.

Section 4817 of this title, referred to in subsec. (a)(8), was in the original "section 1759", and was translated as meaning section 1758 of Pub. L. 115–232, which relates to requirements to identify and control the export of emerging and foundational technologies and is classified to section 4817 of this title, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1 See References in Text note below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         DIAPULSE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                                   FORM 10-QSB
                   FOR THE QUARTER PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Item 7.  Certifications

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 C.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diapulse, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 C.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
         the Company.


         By:      /s/ Jesse Ross                     August 12, 2005
                 --------------------------
                  Jesse Ross
                  Chief Executive Officer
#### Nicholas Friello et al., Respondents, v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co. et al., Defendants, and Carborundum Company, Appellant.

Motion by defendant-appellant for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, denied. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ming Fen Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: September 14, 2010





/s/ Ming Fen LiuMing Fen Liu, Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer
**Exhibit No. 32.2**

**Certification ofCFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Schneider, ChiefFinancial Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1)              The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of DRS Technologies, Inc.

| August 9, 2006 | /s/ Richard A.  Schneider  |   |
|----------------|----------------------------|--------|
|           | Richard A.  Schneider      |
| * *       | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIREDBY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRSTECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHEDTO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

1

----
### §31302. Astronaut healthcare survey

(a) Survey.—The Administrator shall administer an anonymous survey of astronauts and flight surgeons to evaluate communication, relationships, and the effectiveness of policies. The survey questions and the analysis of results shall be evaluated by experts independent of the Administration. The survey shall be administered on at least a biennial basis.

(b) Report.—The Administrator shall transmit a report of the results of the survey to Congress not later than 90 days following completion of the survey.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3377.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31302 | 42 U.S.C. 17822. | Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1103, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4808. |

Section
§ 872.28 Are there any restrictions on how you may use minimum program make up funds? Yes. You may only use minimum program make up funds for: ( a ) Priority 1 and 2 coal reclamation under sections 403(a)(1) and (2) of SMCRA;
( b ) Priority 3 reclamation that is part of Priority 1 or 2 coal reclamation under sections 403(a)(1) or (2) of SMCRA and § 874.13 of this chapter;
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5

<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000764839
<NAME>                   Water Chef Inc.,
<MULTIPLIER>             1
<CURRENCY>               U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                  4,426
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           2,073
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             98,565
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        270,453
<PP&E>                                  375,510
<DEPRECIATION>                          (360,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          388,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   5,148,114
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             8,082
<COMMON>                                35,254
<OTHER-SE>                              7,266,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            388,974
<SALES>                                 354,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        354,792
<CGS>                                   247,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           983,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        73,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      179,044
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         344,055
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            267,653
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.00)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13

Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Carlton Communications Plc, a United Kingdom company (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: January 29, 2004 |  | By: | /s/MICHAEL GREENMichael Green Chairman
|---------------------- |  | --- | --------------------------------------

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---

Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Carlton Communications Plc, a United Kingdom company (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: January 29, 2004 |  | By: | /s/PAUL MURRAYPaul Murray Group Finance Director
|---------------------- |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit
      32







**DIAPULSE
      CORPORATION OF AMERICA**


**FORM
      10-QSB/A**


**For
      the Quarter Period ended March 31, 2007**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Diapulse, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
      of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





| |     |                                     |                                           
| | --- | ----------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ David M. Ross                   | September
            27,
            2007
| |     | David
            M. Ross           |                                           
| |     | Chief Executive
            Officer |                                           
| |     | and Principal Financial Officer     |                                           

A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to Diapulse Corporation of America and will be retained by Diapulse
        Corporation of America and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or its staff upon request.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 9, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-109

Lower Tribunal Nos. F18-17398, F18-13708, F18-13710 

________________

Aristides Alfonso,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Zachary James, Judge.

Aristides Alfonso, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### § 77.1901-1 Methane and oxygen deficiency tests; approved devices.

Tests for oxygen deficiency shall be made with a permissible flame safety lamp or other means approved by the Secretary, and tests for methane shall be made with a methane detector approved by the Secretary.
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 11/21 /14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at a public forum organized by the Tennessee

Department of Environmental Quality
**SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to participants at a public forum at the Baker Center in Knoxville, TN, organized by the Tennessee Department of Environmental Quality on August 2 6 , 2014 

### . The Clea n Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was p roposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES :**  **EPA** Ken Mitchell/EPA R4 Beverly Banister/EPA R4 **External Stakeholders** Bob Martineau/TDEC Approximately 158 attendees
**ATTACHMENT**