alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 00030001
- 00040002
- 00050000
- 00060000
- 00070003
- 00080004
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110005
- 00120006
- 00130000
- 00140000
- 00150007
- 00160008
- 00170009
- 00180010
- 00190011
- 00200000
- 002100bi
- 002200bc
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Organization and Management of Consumers' Cooperatives and Buying Clubs

              																	Lubin, Isador, 1896-1978					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Organization and Management of Consumers' Cooperatives and Buying Clubs : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 665*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1941,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4173,			accessed on September 4, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### §307108. Privately donated funds

(a) Projects for Which Funds May Be Used.—In furtherance of the purposes of this division, the Secretary may accept the donation of funds that may be expended by the Secretary for projects to acquire, restore, preserve, or recover data from any property included on the National Register, as long as the project is owned by a State, any unit of local government, or any nonprofit entity.

(b) Consideration of Factors Respecting Expenditure of Funds.—

(1) In general.—In expending the funds, the Secretary shall give due consideration to—

(A) the national significance of the project;

(B) its historical value to the community;

(C) the imminence of its destruction or loss; and

(D) the expressed intentions of the donor.

(2) Funds available without regard to matching requirements.—Funds expended under this subsection shall be made available without regard to the matching requirements established by sections 302901 and 302902(b) of this title, but the recipient of the funds shall be permitted to utilize them to match any grants from the Historic Preservation Fund.

(c) Transfer of Unobligated Funds.—The Secretary may transfer unobligated funds previously donated to the Secretary for the purposes of the Service, with the consent of the donor, and any funds so transferred shall be used or expended in accordance with this division.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3232.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 307108 | 16 U.S.C. 470h–1. | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §109, as added Pub. L. 96–244, §1, May 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 346. |

Section

In subsection (a), the word "included" is substituted for "listed" for consistency in the revised subtitle.
§ 1656.3 Responsibility for administration. ( a ) The Director in the administration of the Alternative Service Program shall establish and implement appropriate procedures to: ( 1 ) Assure that the program complies with the Selective Service Law;
( 2 ) Provide information to ASWs about their rights and duties;
( 3 ) Find civilian work for ASWs;
( 4 ) Place ASWs in jobs approved for alternative service;
( 5 ) Monitor the work performance of ASWs placed in the program;
( 6 ) Order reassignment and authorize job separation;
( 7 ) Issue certificates of completion;
( 8 ) Specify the location of Alternative Service Offices;
( 9 ) Specify the geographical area in which the ASOs shall have jurisdiction over ASWs;
( 10 ) Refer to the Department of Justice, when appropriate, any ASW who fails to perform satisfactorily his alternative service;
( 11 ) Perform all other functions necessary for the administration of the Alternative Service Program; and
( 12 ) Delegate any of his authority to such office, agent or person as he may designate and provide as appropriate for the subdelegation of such authority.
( b ) The Region Director shall be responsible for the administration and operation of the Alternative Service Program in his Region as prescribed by the Director.
( c ) The State Director shall perform duties for the administration and operation of the Alternative Service Program in his State as prescribed by the Director.
( d ) The ASOM shall perform duties for the administration and operation of the Alternative Service Program as prescribed by the Director. ( 1 ) The ASO shall be an office of record that is responsible for the administration and operation of the Alternative Service Program in its assigned geographical area of jurisdiction.
( 2 ) The staff of each ASO shall consist of as many compensated employees as shall be authorized by the Director.
( 3 ) Appointment of civilians to ASO positions requiring direct dealing with ASWs will be made as soon as feasible.
( e ) The manager of an area office shall perform duties for Alternative Service as prescribed by the Director.
[48 FR 16676, Apr. 19, 1983, as amended at 69 FR 20544, Apr. 16, 2004]
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00145

- CR

EPHRAIN RELIFORD

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County , Texas Trial Cause No. 18

- CRF

- 0348

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 30, 2020
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7638

VINCENT L. SIMMONS, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. WARDEN TERRY O’BRIEN; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cv-00193-jlk) Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 27, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vincent L. Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* Because Simmons was convicted in a District of Columbia court, he is required to obtain a certificate of appealability in order to appeal the denial of his § 2241 petition. See Madley v. United States Parole Comm’n , 278 F.3d 1306 (D.C. Cir. 2002). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Vincent L. Simmons, a District of Columbia prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. * 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Simmons has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
### §1901. Short title, findings, and purposes

#### (a) Short title

This chapter may be cited as the "David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991".

#### (b) Findings

The Congress makes the following findings:

(1) The security of the United States is and will continue to depend on the ability of the United States to exercise international leadership.

(2) The ability of the United States to exercise international leadership is, and will increasingly continue to be, based on the political and economic strength of the United States, as well as on United States military strength around the world.

(3) Recent changes in the world pose threats of a new kind to international stability as Cold War tensions continue to decline while economic competition, regional conflicts, terrorist activities, and weapon proliferations have dramatically increased.

(4) The future national security and economic well-being of the United States will depend substantially on the ability of its citizens to communicate and compete by knowing the languages and cultures of other countries.

(5) The Federal Government has an interest in ensuring that the employees of its departments and agencies with national security responsibilities are prepared to meet the challenges of this changing international environment.

(6) The Federal Government also has an interest in taking actions to alleviate the problem of American undergraduate and graduate students being inadequately prepared to meet the challenges posed by increasing global interaction among nations.

(7) American colleges and universities must place a new emphasis on improving the teaching of foreign languages, area studies, counterproliferation studies, and other international fields to help meet those challenges.

#### (c) Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are as follows:

(1) To provide the necessary resources, accountability, and flexibility to meet the national security education needs of the United States, especially as such needs change over time.

(2) To increase the quantity, diversity, and quality of the teaching and learning of subjects in the fields of foreign languages, area studies, counterproliferation studies, and other international fields that are critical to the Nation's interest.

(3) To produce an increased pool of applicants for work in the departments and agencies of the United States Government with national security responsibilities.

(4) To expand, in conjunction with other Federal programs, the international experience, knowledge base, and perspectives on which the United States citizenry, Government employees, and leaders rely.

(5) To permit the Federal Government to advocate the cause of international education.

(Pub. L. 102–183, title VIII, §801, Dec. 4, 1991, 105 Stat. 1271; Pub. L. 102–496, title IV, §404(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3185; Pub. L. 105–272, title III, §305(a)(1), Oct. 20, 1998, 112 Stat. 2400.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsecs. (b)(7), (c)(2). Pub. L. 105–272 inserted "counterproliferation studies," after "area studies,".

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–496 amended subsec. (a) generally, inserting "David L. Boren".
#### § 113.1 Purpose.

This part implements policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures under 32 CFR part 112 governing delinquent indebtedness of members of the Military Services.
### §300311. National Register

In this division, the term "National Register" means the National Register of Historic Places maintained under chapter 3021 of this title.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3189.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 300311 | 16 U.S.C. 470w(6). | Pub. L. 89–665, title III, §301(6), as added Pub. L. 96–515, title V, §501, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3001. |

Section
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Newcastle

Yellowstone

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse RMP 

Amendments Planning Area

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

RMP Amendments Planning Area

Partuition Areas

Crucial Severe Winter Relief

Crucial Winter

Crucial Yearlong

Yearlong/Severe Winter Relief

Spring/Summer/Fall

Winter

Winter/YearLong

Yearlong

Field Office Boundaries

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Map 17: Pronghorn Habitat Locations
### §31503. Laboratory productivity

The Administration's laboratories are a critical component of the Administration's research capabilities, and the Administrator shall ensure that those laboratories remain productive.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3377.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31503 | 42 U.S.C. 17812(a). | Pub. L. 110–422, title X, §1003(a), Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4807. |

Section
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BALDEV SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71072

Agency No. A076-841-573

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 13, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Baldev Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo due process claims. Mohammed

FILED

NOV 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-71072

v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in

part the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reopen

because he failed to show that he was prejudiced by the alleged ineffective

assistance of his former counsel. See id. at 793-94 (prejudice results when “the

performance of counsel was so inadequate that it may have affected the outcome of

the proceedings” (internal quotation marks omitted)). 

To the extent Singh now contends that his former attorney was also

ineffective for failing to inform him of the need to immediately complete a Form I130 petition, we lack jurisdiction to consider this contention because Singh did not

raise it before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004)

(this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
§ 57.6300 Control of blasting operations. ( a ) Only persons trained and experienced in the handling and use of explosive material shall direct blasting operations and related activities.
( b ) Trainees and inexperienced persons shall work only in the immediate presence of persons trained and experienced in the handling and use of explosive material.
#### § 1615.8 Cancellation of registration.

The Director of Selective Service may cancel the registration of any particular registrant or of a registrant who comes within a specified group of registrants.
#### § 875.18 Lien requirements.

The lien requirements found in part 882—Reclamation on Private Land shall apply to a State's or Indian tribe's noncoal reclamation program under section 411 of the Act, except that for purposes of this section, references made to coal shall not apply. In lieu of the term *coal,* the word *noncoal* should be used.

[59 FR 28173, May 31, 1994]
### §4818. Review relating to countries subject to comprehensive United States arms embargo

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Energy, and the heads of other Federal agencies as appropriate, shall conduct a review of license requirements for exports, reexports, or in-country transfers of items to countries subject to a comprehensive United States arms embargo, including, as appropriate—

(1) the scope of controls under title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, that apply to exports, reexports, and in-country transfers for military end uses and military end users in countries that are subject to a comprehensive United States arms embargo and countries that are subject to a United Nations arms embargo; and

(2) entries on the Commerce Control List maintained under title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, that are not subject to a license requirement for the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of items to countries subject to a comprehensive United States arms embargo.

#### (b) Implementation of results of review

Not later than 270 days after August 13, 2018, the Secretary shall implement the results of the review conducted under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVII, §1759, Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2223; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title X, §1081(d)(8), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3874.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted period for semicolon at end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title X, §1081(d), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3873, provided that the amendment made by section 1081(d)(8) is effective as of Aug. 13, 2018, and as if included in Pub. L. 115–232.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date: November 7, 2008

/s/ RICHARD A. SCHNEIDERRichard A. Schneider Chief Financial Officer


A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

---



QuickLinks
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9994 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount that 

can be withdrawn without penalty from individual retirement plans as 

first-time homebuyer distributions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2024 

Ms. STEVENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the amount that can be withdrawn without penalty from 

individual retirement plans as first-time homebuyer distributions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Time Home5 owner Savings Plan Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9994 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON PENALTY-FREE 

2 FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER DISTRIBUTIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 72(t)(8)(B)(i) of the In4 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$25,000’’. 

6 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 72(t)(8) of 

7 such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 

8 new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(G) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

10 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

11 year after 2025, the $25,000 amount in sub12 paragraph (B)(i) shall be increased by an 

13 amount equal to— 

14 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

15 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de16 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal17 endar year in which the taxable year be18 gins, determined by substituting ‘calendar 

19 year 2024’ for ‘calendar year 2016’ in sub20 paragraph (A)(ii) thereof. 

21 Any increase determined under the preceding 

22 sentence shall be rounded to the nearest mul23 tiple of $100.’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9994 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to distributions made December 

3 31, 2024, in taxable years ending after such date. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 77.1916 Welding, cutting, and soldering; fire protection. ( a ) One portable fire extinguisher shall be provided where welding, cutting, or soldering with arc or flame is performed.
( b ) Welding, cutting, or soldering with arc or flame within or in the vicinity of any slope or shaft, except where such operations are performed in fireproof enclosures, shall be done under the supervision of a qualified person who shall make a diligent search within or in the vicinity of the slope or shaft for fire during and after such operations.
( c ) Before welding, cutting, or soldering is performed in any slope or shaft designed to penetrate into any coalbed below the surface, an examination for methane shall be made by a qualified person with a device approved by the Secretary for detecting methane. Examination for methane shall be made immediately before and periodically during welding, cutting, or soldering and such work shall not be permitted to commence or continue in air which contains 1.0 volume per centum or more of methane.
( d ) Noncombustible barriers shall be installed below welding, cutting, or soldering operations in or over a shaft.
#### § 56.12033 Hand-held electric tools.

Hand-held electric tools shall not be operated at high potential voltages.