alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 795.6 Eligibility for assistance. ( a ) An applicant is eligible for assistance if he or she— ( 1 ) Intends to apply for a permit pursuant to the Act;
( 2 ) Establishes that his or her probable total attributed annual production from all locations on which the operator is issued the surface coal mining and reclamation permit will not exceed 300,000 tons. Production from the following operations shall be attributed to the applicant: ( i ) The pro rata share, based upon percentage of ownership of applicant, of coal produced by operations in which the applicant owns more than a 10 percent interest;
( ii ) The pro rata share, based upon percentage of ownership of applicant, of coal produced in other operations by persons who own more than 10 percent of the applicant's operation;
( iii ) All coal produced by operations owned by persons who directly or indirectly control the applicant by reason of direction of the management;
( iv ) All coal produced by operations owned by members of the applicant's family and the applicants' relatives, unless it is established that there is no direct or indirect business relationship between or among them.
( 3 ) Is not restricted in any manner from receiving a permit under the permanent regulatory program; and
( 4 ) Does not organize or reorganize his or her company solely for the purpose of obtaining assistance under the SOAP.
( b ) A State may provide alternate criteria or procedures for determining the eligibility of an operator for assistance under the program, provided that such criteria may not be used as a basis for grant requests in excess of that which would be authorized under the criteria of paragraph (a) of this section.
[48 FR 2272, Jan. 18, 1983, as amended at 59 FR 28168, May 31, 1994]
#### Corhill Corporation v. S. D. Plants, Inc.

Motion for leave to reargue denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Eager, JJ.
#### § 56.9311 Anchoring stationary sizing devices.

Grizzlies and other stationary sizing devices shall be securely anchored.
#### § 750.21 Coal extraction incidental to the extraction of other minerals.

Part 702 of this chapter is applicable on Indian lands.

[54 FR 52123, Dec. 20, 1989]
#### § 77.203 Use of material or equipment overhead; safeguards.

Where overhead repairs are being made at surface installations and equipment or material is taken into such overhead work areas, adequate protection shall be provided for all persons working or passing below the overhead work areas in which such equipment or material is being used.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 7, 2009 

s0430 

Order 

 

May 7, 2009 

137251 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137251 

 COA: 274945 

Macomb CC: 2006-002756-FC 

JASON MICHAEL GURSKY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the 

issues: (1) whether the statements made by the complainant to Stacy Morgan on or about 

May 4, 2006 were “shown to have been spontaneous and without indication of 

manufacture” within the meaning of MRE 803A(2), and (2) whether it was more 

probable than not that any error in this regard was outcome determinative. See People v 

Lukity, 460 Mich 484, 495-496 (1999). 

 We further ORDER the Macomb Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative 

Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint 

counsel to represent the defendant in this Court. 

 The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys 

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court 

for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
#### W. W. Watts et al., appellees, v. The Moving Picture Machine Operators, etc., et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 7,796.

Bill to enjoin picketing of moving picture theater. Decree for complainants. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. E. S. Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924. *Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 6, 1925.

A. W. Kerr and Robert H. Patton, for appellants.

William L. Patton and Barber & Barber, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Eldorado Resorts LLC andEldorado Capital Corp. (collectively, the “Company”) for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 12, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Gene R. Carano                       |   |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | Gene R.  Carano, Chief Financial Officer |
|                |   | of Eldorado Capital Corp.                |

 

----
#### § 147.18 Introduction.

The following investigative standards are established for all United States Government civilian and military personnel, consultants, contractors, employees of contractors, licensees, certificate holders or grantees and their employees and other individuals who require access to classified information, to include Sensitive Compartmented Information and Special Access Programs, and are to be used by government departments and agencies as the investigative basis for final clearance determinations. However, nothing in these standards prohibits an agency from using any lawful investigative procedures in addition to these requirements in order to resolve any issue identified in the course of a background investigation or reinvestigation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000761895
<NAME>     StarTronix International Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               56500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      5310864
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                    650
<COMMON>                                     47216
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 56500
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               757813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           30000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (787813)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (787813)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.02)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 28, 2014

h0325

Order 

Clerk

March 28, 2014

147434

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 147434

COA: 313207

Kalamazoo CC: 2012-000303-FC

RODERIQUE LAREESE ROLARK,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent and would grant leave to appeal to consider (a) whether the 

trial court clearly erred by determining that a document discovered in defendant’s prison 

cell, appearing to police to contain a detailed and first-hand confession by defendant of 

his involvement in a homicide for which he was then under investigation, was “intended 

for counsel” and therefore properly suppressed and (b) whether the Court of Appeals in 

its characterization of the scope of the attorney-client privilege in Michigan erroneously 

or inadvertently expanded the traditional understanding of the privilege to encompass 

communications intended for yet-unidentified attorneys. See Watson v Detroit Free 

Press, 248 Mich 237, 240 (1929) (stating that for the privilege to apply, “the relation of 

attorney and client must exist”); Devich v Dick, 177 Mich 173, 178 (1913) (stating that 

the defendant need not have formally retained an attorney for this privilege to exist, but 

he must have “‘consult[ed] with an attorney in his professional capacity, with the view to 

obtaining professional advice or assistance, and [if] the attorney voluntarily permits or 

acquiesces in such consultation, then the professional employment must be regarded as 

established’”) (citation omitted).
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Known Trona Leasing Area

Coal Leases

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Counties

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Water

Map 3-13: Coal and Trona Leases
```

[115th Congress Public Law 138]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 345]]

Public Law 115-138
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  9155 Schaefer Road, Converse, Texas, as the ``Converse Veterans Post 
       Office Building''. <<NOTE: Mar. 20, 2018 -  [H.R. 1208]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONVERSE VETERANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9155 Schaefer Road, Converse, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Converse Veterans Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Converse 
Veterans Post Office Building''.

    Approved March 20, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1208:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 163 (2017):
                                    Dec. 12, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 164 (2018):
                                    Mar. 7, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>

__________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    * Note: The approval date has been corrected from Mar. 16, 2018 to 
Mar. 20, 2018.
```
EXHIBIT 15.1

         The Board of Directors
         Eckerd Corporation and Subsidiaries:



         RE:        Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-50223)
                    Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-49977)
                    Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-50755)
                    Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-56261)
                    Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-60175)

         With  respect  to the  above  referenced  registration  statements,  we
         acknowledge our awareness of the  incorporation by reference therein of
         our  report  dated  December  9, 1996  related to our review of interim
         financial  information,  which  report was included in the Form 10-Q of
         Eckerd  Corporation and  Subsidiaries  for the thirty-nine  weeks ended
         November 2, 1996.

         Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities  Act of 1933,  such report
         is not  considered  a part  of a  registration  statement  prepared  or
         certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared or  certified by an
         accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



                                                       KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


         Tampa, Florida
         December 9, 1996
#### KANE v. METROPOLITAN ST. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 17, 1905.)

Action by James Kane against the Metropolitan Street Railroad Company. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
# C_2023342EN.01000301.xml

| 28.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 342/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 342/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11214 – MUBADALA CAPITAL / FORTRESS MANAGEMENT / FIG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 342/03)

On 15 September 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11214. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11214. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### JORDAN et al., Respondents, v. UNDERHILL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Nina Jordan and another against Edward C. Underhill. J. A. Koones, for appellant. J. G. Deane, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 84062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 85 FR 81961, 
December 17, 2020

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Monday, December 21, 
2020 at 11:00 a.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Closed Meeting scheduled for Monday, 
December 21, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. has been changed to Monday, December 
21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: December 18, 2020.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-28540 Filed 12-21-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### In re GOETZ. In the matter of Ignace Goetz. T. F. Byrne, for appellant. W. H. Hamilton, for respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Goetz, 71 App. Div. 272, 75 N. Y. Supp. 750.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      26,000
<SECURITIES>                               176,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                369,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         6,662,000
<PP&E>                                  (1,958,000)
<DEPRECIATION>                           5,073,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           7,907,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                    405,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       28,000
<PREFERRED>                             10,040,000
<COMMON>                                    28,000
<OTHER-SE>                               5,073,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,620,000
<SALES>                                  2,620,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         4,027,000
<CGS>                                    5,920,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,567,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         1,103,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       4,867,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                             4,867,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                4,867,000
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        


</TABLE>
### §403–3e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403–3e, comprising section 103E of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3030 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Statement Pursuant to Section 1350(a) of title 18, United States Code



The undersigned, Peter R. Kann and Christopher W. Vieth, certify that:





|(1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Form 10-Q), which is being filed today with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. | 
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 







|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 





|/s/ Peter R. Kann        
|-------------------------
|Peter R. Kann            
|Chief Executive Officer  
|Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
|                         
|Date: May 6, 2005        
|                         
|/s/ Christopher W. Vieth 
|Christopher W. Vieth     
|Chief Financial Officer  
|Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
|                         
|Date: May 6, 2005        









End of Filing
§ 174.1 Purpose. This part: ( a ) Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and implements base closure laws and associated provisions of law relating to the closure and the realignment of installations. It does not address the process for selecting installations for closure or realignment.
( b ) Authorizes the publication of DoD 4165.66-M, “Base Redevelopment and Realignment Manual,” in accordance with DoD 5025.1-M[1] , “DoD Directive System Procedures,” March 2003.
Footnotes -
174.1
[1] Copies may be obtained at *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/publ.html .*