alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                               REPORT ON SCHEDULE
                                       AND
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of  Directors
MAI Systems Corporation

The audits referred to in our report dated March 2, 2001, included the related
financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2000, included in the annual report on Form 10-K. This
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule
based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-92194) on Form S-8, of MAI Systems Corporation of our report dated March 2,
2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MAI Systems Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and comprehensive
income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2000, and our report dated March 22, 2001 relating to
financial schedule, which reports appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report
on Form 10-K of MAI Systems Corporation.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Orange County, California
March 22, 2001
###### Editorial Note on Part 817

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 817 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 817.59 Coal recovery.

Underground mining activities shall be conducted so as to maximize the utilization and conservation of the coal, while utilizing the best technology currently available to maintain environmental integrity, so that reaffecting the land in the future through surface coal mining operations is minimized.

[44 FR 15422, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Williams, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for substitution of assigned counsel, denied. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
DIAGNOSTIC/RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       8,616,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,224,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 23,297,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            56,055,000
<PP&E>                                      47,147,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,480,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              92,075,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,095,000
<BONDS>                                     32,309,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,095,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                92,075,000
<SALES>                                     38,379,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,379,000
<CGS>                                       35,125,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,125,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             914,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,304,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   898,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,406,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
§ 772.14 Commercial use or sale. ( a ) Except as provided under §§ 772.14(b) and 700.11(a)(5), any person who intends to commercially use or sell coal extracted during coal exploration operations under an exploration permit, shall first obtain a permit to conduct surface coal mining operations for those operations from the regulatory authority under parts 773 through 785 of this chapter.
( b ) With the prior written approval of the regulatory authority, no permit to conduct surface coal mining operations is required for the sale or commercial use of coal extracted during exploration operations if such sale or commercial use is for coal testing purposes only. The person conducting the exploration shall file an application for such approval with the regulatory authority. The application shall demonstrate that the coal testing is necessary for the development of a surface coal mining and reclamation operation for which a surface coal mining operations permit application is to be submitted in the near future, and that the proposed commercial use or sale of coal extracted during exploration operations is solely for the purpose of testing the coal. The application shall contain the following: ( 1 ) The name of the testing firm and the locations at which the coal will be tested.
( 2 ) If the coal will be sold directly to, or commercially used directly by, the intended end user, a statement from the intended end user, or if the coal is sold indirectly to the intended end user through an agent or broker, a statement from the agent or broker. The statement shall include: ( i ) The specific reason for the test, including why the coal may be so different from the intended user's other coal supplies as to require testing;
( ii ) The amount of coal necessary for the test and why a lesser amount is not sufficient; and
( iii ) A description of the specific tests that will be conducted.
( 3 ) Evidence that sufficient reserves of coal are available to the person conducting exploration or its principals for future commercial use or sale to the intended end user, or agent or broker of such user identified above, to demonstrate that the amount of coal to be removed is not the total reserve, but is a sampling of a larger reserve.
( 4 ) An explanation as to why other means of exploration, such as core drilling, are not adequate to determine the quality of the coal and/or the feasibility of developing a surface coal mining operation.
[53 FR 52949, Dec. 29, 1988]
*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as

provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting

by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROGELIO BARRAGANCAMPOS,

Petitioner–Appellee,

vs.

JANET NAPOLITANO et al.,

Respondents–Appellees.

 No. 07-15407 

 

 D.C. No. CV-06-07057-CRN

 MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 15, 2010

San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and BURGESS, District Judge.**

Rogelio Barragan-Campos (“Barragan-Campos”) appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus or, alternatively, a writ of

mandamus. Barragan-Campos seeks to challenge the reinstatement of his 1989

deportation order and obtain review of Immigration Judge Marilyn J. Teeter’s

order terminating his removal proceedings. 

FILED

JUL 28 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
We conclude that the district court correctly held that the REAL ID Act of

2005 divested district courts of habeas corpus jurisdiction to hear challenges to

final orders of removal, including the reinstatement of deportation orders. 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(b)(9). However, we also hold that the district court possessed jurisdiction

to review Barragan-Campos’s direct constitutional challenge to the REAL ID

Act—that the Act deprives the district court of habeas corpus jurisdiction without

providing an adequate substitute in the court of appeals. See Puri v. Gonzales, 464

F.3d 1038, 1041 (9th Cir. 2006). Despite the district court’s error, we uphold the

district court’s dismissal since we have expressly repudiated Barragan-Campos’s

constitutional claim. Id. (in enacting the REAL ID Act, “Congress . . . provided an

adequate substitute for habeas proceedings”); Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Bayona, 223

F.3d 1030, 1034 n. 4 (9th Cir. 2000) (“[W]e may affirm the district court on any

ground supported by the record, even if the ground is not relied on by the district

court.”). 

Additionally, the district court did not err in concluding that it lacked

jurisdiction to review the Immigration Judge’s decision to terminate removal

proceedings. The court correctly determined that it could not review the

Immigration Judge’s termination decision until Barragan-Campos exhausted his

administrative remedies with the BIA. The fact that the BIA has since affirmed the

Immigration Judge’s termination order does not mean that the district court erred,

nor does it vest us with jurisdiction over this order. 

AFFIRMED.
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lewis 

Weinstock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, David Orlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, John 

Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/24/2011 11:49 AM

Subject: Redline of CO Preamble language

Heidi,

I discovered that Deirdre created a complete redline version on Friday afternoon, which is attached. It 

compares the new language we have added in response to interagency comments to the original version 

we sent to you. The key monitoring discussion starts on page 131 and responds, we hope, to all of the 

DOT and other comments on monitoring. DOT may be particularly interested in the language that begins 

on page 133, which explains the rationale for the new CO near-road network requirements. Please let 

me know if you have any questions. If you can let me know tomorrow whether there are any further 

questions, that would be most helpful. 

Lydia
#### In re FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND. In the matter of the application of the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland for leave to commence an action against George H. Stevens, as committee of the person and estate of Nancy C. Warner, an incompetent person.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

PER CURIAM.

Motion granted, and the following questions certified: (1) As between the sureties on all the bonds mentioned in the record, was the appellant first and primarily liable on the last appeal bond? (2) The appellant being surety on the appeal bonds, can it require contribution from sureties on the original bond of the committee, or from the estates of such persons, even if the amount paid by the appellant was in form paid on the bond given by the committee as such, and not on the appeal bonds?
§ 886.20 What happens to unused funds from my grant? ( a ) If there are any unexpended funds after your grant is completed, we deobligate the funds when we close your grant. We treat unused funds as follows: ( 1 ) We transfer any State share funds under § 872.14 of this chapter or Tribal share funds under § 872.17 that were not expended within three years of the date they were awarded in a grant, except five years for funds awarded in Fiscal Years 2008, 2009, and 2010, to historic coal funds, § 872.21 of this chapter. We distribute any funds transferred to historic coal in the next annual distribution in the same way as historic coal funds from fee collections during that fiscal year.
( 2 ) We hold any unused Federal expense funds under § 872.24 of this chapter for distribution to any State or Indian tribe as needed for the activity for which the funds were appropriated.
( 3 ) We make unused funds of all other types available for re-award to the same State or Indian tribe to which they were originally distributed. This includes historic coal funds under § 872.21 of this chapter, minimum program make up funds under § 872.26 of this chapter, and prior balance replacement funds under § 872.29 of this chapter.
( b ) If you have any State share funds or Tribal share funds that were distributed to you in an annual distribution under § 872.15 or § 872.18 of this chapter but that were not awarded to you in grant within 3 years of the date they were distributed, or 5 years for funds distributed in Fiscal Years 2008, 2009, and 2010, we transfer the unawarded funds to the historic coal fund under § 872.21 of this chapter and distribute them in the next annual distribution.
#### § 905.823 Special performance standards—Operations on prime farmland.

Part 832 of this chapter, Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Operations on Prime Farmland, shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations on prime farmland.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  North  American  Gaming  and
Entertainment  Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof  (the  "Report"),  I E. H. Hawes II,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ E.H.HAWES, II
---------------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

May 17,  2004

================================================================================
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9948 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9948

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide transportation to and 
   from Department of Veterans Affairs facilities in connection with 
                vocational rehabilitation or counseling.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2024

Mr. Panetta (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, and Mr. Lieu) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide transportation to and 
   from Department of Veterans Affairs facilities in connection with 
                vocational rehabilitation or counseling.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Earned Transportation Act'' 
or the ``Vets ETA''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO 
              PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION TO AND FROM DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS FACILITIES IN CONNECTION WITH VOCATIONAL 
              REHABILITATION OR COUNSELING.

    Section 111A(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1) The Secretary'' and inserting ``The 
        Secretary''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (2).
                                 <all>
```
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

48) IV-C-14 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:53 AM Sheet 48 of 232 
~ p? 

I ^W? 7 £ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

V%jl-P ^ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

% P * ^ _*_, JAN - 6 I9f 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Michael DeWine 

U.S. House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. DeWine: 

Thank you for passing along the comments of Mr. David Ogan 

and Mr. William C. Rose concerning EPA's proposal to require 

onboard refueling emission controls. Be assured that these 

comments will be considered as we prepare our Final Rule. We 

will also be placing them in the public docket for the Rule 

(Docket No. A-87-11). 

• • * 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. | 

Sincerely yours, 

IS/ 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Docket A-87-11 
P.3 

,.,.,, 1 5 IS88
Editorial Note on Part 816
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 816 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 816.111 Revegetation: General requirements. ( a ) The permittee shall establish on regraded areas and on all other disturbed areas except water areas and surface areas of roads that are approved as part of the postmining land use, a vegetative cover that is in accordance with the approved permit and reclamation plan and that is— ( 1 ) Diverse, effective, and permanent;
( 2 ) Comprised of species native to the area, or of introduced species where desirable and necessary to achieve the approved postmining land use and approved by the regulatory authority;
( 3 ) At least equal in extent of cover to the natural vegetation of the area; and
( 4 ) Capable of stabilizing the soil surface from erosion.
( b ) The reestablished plant species shall— ( 1 ) Be compatible with the approved postmining land use;
( 2 ) Have the same seasonal characteristics of growth as the original vegetation;
( 3 ) Be capable of self-regeneration and plant succession;
( 4 ) Be compatible with the plant and animal species of the area; and
( 5 ) Meet the requirements of applicable State and Federal seed, poisonous and noxious plant, and introduced species laws or regulations.
( c ) The regulatory authority may grant exception to the requirements of paragraphs (b) (2) and (3) of this section when the species are necessary to achieve a quick-growing, temporary, stabilizing cover, and measures to establish permanent vegetation are included in the approved permit and reclamation plan.
( d ) When the regulatory authority approves a cropland postmining land use, the regulatory authority may grant exception to the requirements of paragraphs (a) (1), (3), (b) (2), and (3) of this section. The requirements of part 823 of this chapter apply to areas identified as prime farmland.
[48 FR 40160, Sept. 2, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017]
#### § 77.807-3 Movement of equipment; minimum distance from high-voltage lines.

When any part of any equipment operated on the surface of any coal mine is required to pass under or by any energized high-voltage powerline and the clearance between such equipment and powerline is less than that specified in § 77.807-2 for booms and masts, such powerlines shall be deenergized or other precautions shall be taken.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David J. NobleDavid J. NobleChairman/Director Principal
Executive Officer


Date:    May 10, 2011
§ 926.20 Approval of Montana abandoned mine land reclamation plan. The Montana Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan, as submitted on June 16, 1980, and as revised on July 28, 1980, is approved effective November 24, 1980. Copies of the approved plan are available at: ( a ) Montana Department of Environmental Quality, 1625 Eleventh Avenue, Helena, MT 59620-1601.
( b ) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Casper Field Office, 100 East B Street, Room 2128, Casper, WY 82601-1918.
[60 FR 37002, July 19, 1995]
### **CHAPTER 7—JUDICIAL REVIEW**

Sec.
701.
Application; definitions.
702.
Right of review.
703.
Form and venue of proceeding.
704.
Actions reviewable.
705.
Relief pending review.
706.
Scope of review.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

The provisions of sections 551 to 559 of this title and this chapter were originally enacted by act June 11, 1946, ch. 324, 60 Stat. 237, popularly known as the "Administrative Procedure Act". That Act was repealed as part of the general revision of this title by Pub. L. 89–554 and its provisions incorporated into sections 551 to 559 of this title and this chapter.
Exhibit No. 99.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Richard A. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q accompanying this
certificate, and based on the inquiries I have made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief Financial Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., I hereby certify
that:



This
certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Financial Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purpose.

|/s/RICHARD A. SCHNEIDERRichard A. Schneider
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

This
certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

QuickLinks