alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023325EN.01000101.xml

| 15.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11197 – SCL / ETHIAS / ETHIAS LEASE JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 325/01)

On 24 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11197. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11197. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Wilabel Johnson, Appellant, v International Talc Company et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 18, 1977. Claimant’s deceased husband, while employed for approximately 20 years, including a period with International Talc Company from January, 1954 to July, 1954, was exposed to talc. He filed a claim for compensation on May 24, 1973 alleging a lung condition. He died on November 21, 1973. The board found that decedent had a partial pulmonary disability due to pneumoconiosis, as a result of inhalation of talc and silicosis dust and pulmonary emphysema. The board also found that decedent’s death was not causally related to his occupation. Decedent’s attending physician testified that he felt that the decedent was totally disabled. He also testified that in his opinion the lung condition contributed to the death. There was other medical testimony, however, to the effect that while decedent’s lung condition was causally related to his occupation, said condition produced a partial pulmonary disability. The impartial specialist concluded that decedent’s death was not related to his occupation. The provisions of section 39 of the Workers’ Compensation Law, as they existed at the time of decedent’s disablement, did not allow an award for partial disability due to dust disease. It is well settled that conflicting medical opinions create issues of fact for the board to resolve and the board’s decision is not to be disturbed if it is supported by substantial evidence *(Matter of Bohn v Taiwan Rest.,*58 AD2d 903; *Matter of Ayub v Ideal Toy Co.,*50 AD2d 1051). There is, in our view, substantial evidence to sustain the board’s determination and, therefore, it should be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
§ 90.205T Approved sampling devices; operation; air flowrate. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28484 , Apr. 18, 2024.
As of April 14, 2025: ( a ) Approved sampling devices shall be operated at the flowrate of 2.0 L/min if using a CMDPSU; at 2.2 L/min if using a CPDM; or at a different flowrate recommended by the manufacturer.
( b ) If using a CMDPSU, each approved sampling device shall be examined each shift, by a person certified in sampling during: ( 1 ) The second hour after being put into operation to assure it is in the proper location, operating properly, and at the proper flowrate. If the proper flowrate is not maintained, necessary adjustments shall be made by the certified person. This examination is not required if the sampling device is being operated in an anthracite coal mine using the full box, open breast, or slant breast mining method.
( 2 ) The last hour of operation to assure that the sampling device is operating properly and at the proper flowrate. If the proper flowrate is not maintained, the respirable dust sample shall be transmitted to MSHA with a notation by the certified person on the back of the dust data card stating that the proper flowrate was not maintained. Other events occurring during the collection of respirable dust samples that may affect the validity of the sample, such as dropping of the sampling head assembly onto the mine floor, shall be noted on the back of the dust data card.
( c ) If using a CPDM, the person certified in sampling shall monitor the dust concentrations and the sampling status conditions being reported by the sampling device at mid-shift or more frequently as specified in the approved respirable dust control plan, if applicable, to assure: The sampling device is in the proper location and operating properly; and the work environment of the Part 90 miner being sampled remains in compliance with the standard at the end of the shift. This monitoring is not required if the sampling device is being operated in an anthracite coal mine using the full box, open breast, or slant breast mining method.
[89 FR 28483, Apr. 18, 2024]
#### HAAN et al., Respondents, v. ROBERT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Action by R. M. Haan & Co. against Julia Robert. J. M. Bowers, for appellant.” W. F. Severance, for respondents.

No opinion. Order modified by requiring plaintiff to give a bond to pay whatever amount may be found due for the use of the water, in the event that it should be finally determined that the plaintiff is not entitled to judgment in this action, and as modified affirmed, without costs.
^

^

^

^

^

^ ^

^ ^

Map 3-1: Historic Sites and

National Historic Trails

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundaries

^ Historic Sites

Historic Site Areas

National Historic Trails

Other Historic Trails

BLM & USFS Surface Management

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
### §14906. Evasion of regulation of carriers and brokers

A person, or an officer, employee, or agent of that person, that by any means tries to evade regulation provided under this part for carriers or brokers is liable to the United States for a civil penalty of at least $2,000 for the first violation and at least $5,000 for a subsequent violation, and may be subject to criminal penalties.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 916; amended Pub. L. 112–141, div. C, title II, §32505(b), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 804.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11906 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### Amendments

2012—Pub. L. 112–141 substituted "at least $2,000" for "$200" and "$5,000" for "$250" and inserted ", and may be subject to criminal penalties" after "a subsequent violation".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2012 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–141 effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of Title 23, Highways.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40708

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff―Appellee,

versus

POLICARPO MARTIN SANTIAGO-REYES, Also Known as Policzpo Santiago,

Defendant―Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-609-1

Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Policarpo SantiagoReyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40708 Document: 00513007963 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2015
No. 14-40708

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Santiago-Reyes has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, 

and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-40708 Document: 00513007963 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2015
#### § 903.785 Requirements for permits for special categories of mining.

Part 785 of this chapter, *Requirements for permits for Special Categories of Mining,* applies to any person who submits an application for a permit to conduct certain categories of surface coal mining and reclamation operations as specified therein.
§ 77.1431 Minimum rope strength. At installation, the nominal strength (manufacturer's published catalog strength) of wire ropes used for hoisting shall meet the minimum rope strength values obtained by the following formulas in which “L” equals the maximum suspended rope length in feet: ( a ) *Winding drum ropes* (all constructions, including rotation resistant). For rope lengths less than 3,000 feet: Minimum Value = Static Load × (7.0−0.001L) For rope lengths 3,000 feet or greater: Minimum Value = Static Load × 4.0
( b ) *Friction drum ropes.* For rope lengths less than 4,000 feet: Minimum Value = Static Load × (7.0−0.0005L) For rope lengths 4,000 feet or greater: Minimum Value = Static Load × 5.0
( c ) *Tail ropes* (balance ropes).
Minimum Value = Weight of Rope × 7.0
[48 FR 53241, Nov. 25, 1983; 48 FR 54975, Dec. 8, 1983]
Exhibit No. 24.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

We, the undersigned directors of Questar Pipeline Company, hereby severally constitute D. N. Rose and S. E. Parks, and each of them acting alone, our true and
lawful attorneys, with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 and any and
all amendments to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Questar Pipeline Company, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by the attorneys appointed
herein to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 and any and all amendments to such Report.

Witness
our hands on the respective dates set forth below.

|Signature                             |  | Title                                          |  | Date   
|------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  | -------
|                                      |  |                                                |  |        
|/s/R. D. CASHR. D. Cash               |  | Chairman of the Board                          |  | 2-11-03
|/s/K. O. RATTIEK. O. Rattie           |  | Vice Chairman                                  |  | 2-11-03
|/s/D. N. ROSED. N. Rose               |  | President and Chief
Executive Officer
Director |  | 2-11-03
|/s/TERESA BECKTeresa Beck             |  | Director                                       |  | 2-11-03
|/s/U. EDWIN GARRISONU. Edwin Garrison |  | Director                                       |  | 2-11-03
|/s/GARY G. MICHAELGary G. Michael     |  | Director                                       |  | 2-11-03

---

QuickLinks
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Money Disbursements of Wage Earners and Clerical Workers in Five Cities in the West North Central-mountain Region, 1934-36

              																	Jones, Alice Hanson, 1904-1985					 and 	Williams, Faith M. (Faith Moors), 1893-. 						*Money Disbursements of Wage Earners and Clerical Workers in Five Cities in the West North Central-mountain Region, 1934-36 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 641*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1939,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4154,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis
J. Allingham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Dennis J. Allingham
---------------------------
Dennis J. Allingham
President and Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                           Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D. C.

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of our
report dated January 11, 2002, on our audit of the  consolidated  financial
statements of Citizens Financial Corp. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, appearing in
Part II, Item 8 of the 2001 Form 10-K of Citizens Financial Corp.

                                       ARNETT & FOSTER, P.L.L.C.

Charleston, West Virginia
March 19, 2002
### **CHAPTER 311—SAFETY**

Sec.
31101.
Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel.
31102.
Drug and alcohol testing.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.1

                               LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC.
                                3515 Lyman Boulevard
                                  Chaska, MN 55318


November 14, 1996

James W. Bracke, Ph.D.
3947 Huntington Drive
Minnetonka, MN 55343

Dear Jim:

Reference is made to the Employment Agreement as of June 1, 1991, between 
Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. (the "Company"), a Minnesota corporation, and James 
W. Bracke ("Employee").  The Company and Employee hereby agree to amend the 
Agreement as follows:

A.   Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:

     3.   Term.  The term of this agreement shall extend through November 14,
          2000, subject to the provisions of Section 5 and Section 16 hereof.

B.   Paragraph 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:

     5.   Renewal.  If Employee remains in the employment of Company after the
          expiration of the term of this Agreement specified in Section 3, the
          term of this Agreement shall automatically be extended for successive
          one-year terms, unless either party to this Agreement gives written
          notice to the other party at least 30 days prior to the end of such
          term of such party's intention not to renew the term of this
          Agreement. 

If these terms are acceptable to you, please indicate by signing this letter 
in the space indicated below.

                                   Very truly yours,

                              LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC.


                              By  /s/   Richard W. Perkins       
                                 --------------------------------
                                   Richard W. Perkins
                                   Chairman, Compensation Committee

Agreed and accepted this
14th day of November, 1996

 /s/ James W. Bracke          
----------------------------
James W. Bracke, Ph.D.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         DIAPULSE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                                   FORM 10-QSB
                 FOR THE QUARTER PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Item 7.  Certifications

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 C.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diapulse, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 C.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


          By:     /s/ Jesse Ross                         November 14, 2006
                  --------------------------
                  Jesse Ross
                  Chief Executive Officer
### §3233. Misuse of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence name, initials, or seal

#### (a) Prohibited acts

No person may, except with the written permission of the Director of National Intelligence, or a designee of the Director, knowingly use the words "Office of the Director of National Intelligence", the initials "ODNI", the seal of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, or any colorable imitation of such words, initials, or seal in connection with any merchandise, impersonation, solicitation, or commercial activity in a manner reasonably calculated to convey the impression that such use is approved, endorsed, or authorized by the Director of National Intelligence.

#### (b) Injunction

Whenever it appears to the Attorney General that any person is engaged or is about to engage in an act or practice which constitutes or will constitute conduct prohibited by subsection (a), the Attorney General may initiate a civil proceeding in a district court of the United States to enjoin such act or practice. Such court shall proceed as soon as practicable to the hearing and determination of such action and may, at any time before final determination, enter such restraining orders or prohibitions, or take such other action as is warranted, to prevent injury to the United States or to any person or class of persons for whose protection the action is brought.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title XI, §1103, as added Pub. L. 111–259, title IV, §413(a), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2726.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 442b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.