alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4324. Return by Custodian, to United States, of payments under licenses, assignments or sales of patents

The Alien Property Custodian is authorized and directed to return to the United States any consideration paid to him by the United States under any license, assignment, or sale by the Alien Property Custodian to the United States of any patent (or any right therein or claim thereto, and including an application therefor and any patent issued pursuant to any such application).

(Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, §27, as added Mar. 10, 1928, ch. 167, §15, 45 Stat. 274.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 27 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by law in Alien Property Custodian and Office of Alien Property Custodian transferred to Attorney General by Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1947, §101, eff. July 1, 1947, 12 F.R. 4534, 61 Stat. 951, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### Geology and mineral resources of the Mud Springs Ranch Quadrangle, Sweetwater County, Wyoming

By: Henry W. Roehler

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1065C

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Staements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         179,795
<SECURITIES>                                    16,143
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,938
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,083
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,649
<OTHER-SE>                                     177,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,938
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,283
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               130,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,988
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (12,592)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 76 (Friday, April 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 23547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09434]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters To Be Considered:
    Briefing Matter: Strollers--NPR
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/live. 
For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call 
(301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: April 17, 2013.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-09434 Filed 4-17-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
§ 886.15 How do I apply for a grant? ( a ) You must use application forms and procedures specified by OSM.
( b ) We approve or disapprove your grant application within 60 days of receipt.
( c ) If we do not approve your application, we inform you in writing of the reasons for disapproval. We may propose modifications if appropriate. You may resubmit the application or appropriate revised portions of the application. We process the revised application as an original application.
( d ) You must agree to carry out activities funded by the grant in accordance with SMCRA, applicable Federal laws and regulations, and applicable OMB and Treasury Circulars.
( e ) We do not require complete copies of plans and specifications for projects either before the grant is approved or at the start of the project. However, after the start of the project, we may review your plans and specifications at your office, the project site, or any other appropriate site.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7588

CLEVELAND LEWIS WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF 

NORTH CAROLINA; BONTIA WITHERSPOON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00598-FDW)

Submitted: June 30, 2016 Decided: July 26, 2016

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleveland Lewis Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe 

DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cleveland Lewis Williams seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. 

We dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the 

notice of appeal was not timely filed.

In civil cases in which the United States is not a party, 

parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of final 

judgment or order to note an appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(1)(A). The district court may, however, extend the time 

for filing a notice of appeal if a party so moves within thirty 

days after the expiration of the original appeal period and 

demonstrates excusable neglect or good cause for the extension. 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). The district court may also reopen the 

appeal period upon a timely motion by a party. Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil 

case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 

U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order dismissing Williams’ § 2254 

petition was entered on August 21, 2015. Thus, Williams had 

until September 21, 2015, to file a notice of appeal. Williams 

executed his notice of appeal on October 5, 2015. Although the 

appeal period may be extended under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or 

reopened under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6), Williams has failed to 

file any motion seeking relief pursuant to these provisions. 
3

See Shah v. Hutto, 722 F.2d 1167, 1168-69 (4th Cir. 1983) (en 

banc) (“A bare notice of appeal should not be construed as a 

motion for extension of time, where no request for additional 

time is manifest.”) Because Williams failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the 

appeal period, we deny his motion to proceed in forma pauperis 

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Oakgrove Construction, Inc., Appellant, v Genesee Valley Nurseries, Inc., Defendant, and Colonial Surety Company, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[834 NYS2d 822]—

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Eugene M. Fahey, J.), entered July 20, 2006. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon renewal, adhered to the court’s prior decision.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for, inter alia, breach of a performance bond concerning a contract to, among other things, plant trees and shrubs along a section of the New York State Thruway in Niagara County. Supreme Court previously granted the motion of Colonial Surety Company (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against it and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for, inter alia, partial summary judgment on liability against defendant on the performance bond. *1284By the order on appeal, the court granted plaintiffs motion for leave to renew and, upon renewal, adhered to its prior decision. We reverse the order insofar as appealed from.

The court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant on a ground not raised by defendant in support of its motion, i.e., that the underlying contract between plaintiff and the New York State Thruway Authority (Thruway Authority) required that the plantings be maintained for only one year. In doing so, the court determined that it need not reach the issues raised by the parties. We agree with plaintiff that defendant was not entitled to summary judgment on that ground. Although the general terms of the Thruway Authority’s specification's required that the plantings be maintained for a one-year “Period of Establishment,” the specific bid provisions governing that contract required the obligor to maintain them for a two-year period. “Where there are general and special provisions relating to the same thing, the special provisions control, even if there is an inconsistency between the special provisions and the general provisions” (22 NY Jur 2d, Contracts § 254). Furthermore, “[w]here two documents are to be construed—one specifically prepared for the transaction in question and the other a general form—the former takes precedence as to all provisions [that] are repugnant in the two documents” *(Teal v Place,*85 AD2d 788, 789 [1981]). We thus conclude that the court erred in determining the motion and cross motion on that ground. Because the court “did not consider the merits of the motion [or cross motion on the grounds raised by the parties], the matter must be remitted to . . . Supreme Court . . . for such a determination” *(Edith Bolte Kutz Trust v Atlantic Coast Constr., LLC,*32 AD3d 377, 378 [2006]). Present—Martoche, J.P., Smith, Centra, Lunn and Peradotto, JJ.
### §20930. Authorization of appropriations

In addition to the amounts authorized for payments and grants under this subchapter and the amounts authorized to be appropriated for the program under section 21123 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated for each of the fiscal years 2003 through 2005 such sums as may be necessary (but not to exceed $10,000,000 for each such year) for the Commission to carry out this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title II, §210, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15330 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of First Community
Financial Corporation, (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James R.
McLaughlin, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted
pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.     To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.







Date: March 10, 2003                        By: /s/ James R. McLaughlin
      ---------------------                     -------------------------------
                                                James R. McLaughlin,
                                                President & CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9833 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9833

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the treatment of 
 nondisclosure agreements with respect to privatized military housing, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2024

Ms. Jacobs (for herself and Mr. Davis of North Carolina) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the treatment of 
 nondisclosure agreements with respect to privatized military housing, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restore Military Families' Voices 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS WITH RESPECT TO 
              PRIVATIZED MILITARY HOUSING.

    Section 2890(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``(1) A tenant or prospective 
                tenant of a housing unit may not be required to sign'' 
                and inserting ``A landlord may not request that a 
                tenant or prospective tenant of a housing unit sign''; 
                and
                    (B) in the first sentence, by inserting ``or in 
                connection with the provision by the landlord of 
                services related to the housing unit'' before the 
                period; and
            (2) by striking paragraphs (2) and (3).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of The Dewey Electronics
Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.

/s/ John H.D. Dewey
John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 12, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained
by The Dewey Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
 AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.
 SUMMARY: The Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Accordingly, EDA has initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of the firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firms' workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  List of Petitions Received by EDA for Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
[11/26/2020 through 12/10/2020]
Firm name
Firm address
Date accepted for investigation
Product(s)Gasket Engineering Company, Inc
4500 East 75th Terrace, Kansas City, MO 64132
12/4/2020
The firm manufactures gaskets.Custom Vinyl Products, LLC
260 Enterprise Drive, Newport News, VA 23603
12/8/2020
The firm manufactures windows and patio doors.Machined Products Company d/b/a MPCO
82 Pitney Road, Lancaster, PA 17605
12/9/2020
The firm manufactures miscellaneous metal parts.( print page 83886)Midwest Precision, Inc
9725 East Admiral Place, Tulsa, OK 74113
12/10/2020
The firm manufactures miscellaneous metal parts and assemblies.
 Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. These petitions are received pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Bryan Borlik, Director.


[FR Doc. 2020-28401 Filed 12-22-20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-WH-P
### §30115. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Commission for the purpose of carrying out its functions under this Act, and under chapters 95 and 96 of title 26, not to exceed $5,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1975. There are authorized to be appropriated to the Commission $6,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, $1,500,000 for the period beginning July 1, 1976, and ending September 30, 1976, $6,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1977, $7,811,500 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1978, and $9,400,000 (of which not more than $400,000 are authorized to be appropriated for the national clearinghouse function described in section 30111(a)(10) 1 of this title) for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1981.

(Pub. L. 92–225, title III, §314, formerly §320, as added Pub. L. 93–443, title II, §210, Oct. 15, 1974, 88 Stat. 1289; renumbered §319 and amended Pub. L. 94–283, title I, §§105, 113, May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 481, 495; Pub. L. 95–127, Oct. 12, 1977, 91 Stat. 1110; renumbered §314, Pub. L. 96–187, title I, §105(5), Jan. 8, 1980, 93 Stat. 1354; Pub. L. 96–253, May 29, 1980, 94 Stat. 398; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as defined by section 30101 of this title.

Section 30111(a)(10) of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 107–252, title VIII, §801(b)(3), Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1726.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 439c of Title 2, The Congress, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 314 of Pub. L. 92–225 was renumbered section 310, and is classified to section 30110 of this title.

Another prior section 314 of Pub. L. 92–225 was renumbered section 309, and is classified to section 30109 of this title.

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954", which for purposes of codification was translated as "title 26" thus requiring no change in text.

1980—Pub. L. 96–253 inserted provisions authorizing appropriations of $9,400,000 for fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1981.

1977—Pub. L. 95–127 inserted provisions authorizing appropriations of $7,811,500 for fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1978.

1976—Pub. L. 94–283, §113, inserted provisions authorizing appropriations through fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1977.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1975, see section 410(a) of Pub. L. 93–443, set out as an Effective Date of 1974 Amendment note under section 30101 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.