alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.109**AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE**               This Amendment to the Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”), dated as of September29th, 2005, executed by Sedona Corporation (the “Maker”) payable to the order of William W.Rucks, IV (the “Holder”), in the principal amount of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND and no/100 dollars($500,000.00), is entered into as of March 6, 2008.  **Whereas,** the Note was originally due to mature on September 29, 2007(the “Maturity Date”); and   **Whereas,**Maker has made no payments under the Note to date; and   **Whereas,**Maker and the Holder desire to further extend the Maturity Date;   **Now Therefore,**for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency ofwhich is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Note as follows: 1. The Maturity Date of the Note shall be further extended until January1, 2009.  2. To effectuate the foregoing:   Section 1 (d) of the Note shall be replaced in its entirety by the following: * ** **“The term**“Maturity**” shall mean the date on which this Note shall be dueand payable in full, which date shall be January 1, 2009.”*   Section 2 of the Note shall be replaced in its entirety by the following: * ** **“**Payment Terms**. This Loan shall be effective commencing on theeffective date and continuing until Maturity. The Maker shall be obligated to makeone payment of all outstanding principal and interest due thereon at Maturity.Unless otherwise designated in writing, mailed or delivered to Maker, the place forpayment of the indebtedness evidenced by this Note shall be the Holder’s principaladdress as noted above. Payments received on this Note shall be applied first toaccrued interest, and the balance to principal.”* 3. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribedto them in the Note.
 

 
 4. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Note shall remain in full force and effect,enforceable in accordance with its terms and Maker hereby reaffirms and acknowledgesall of its obligations thereunder.     **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first writtenabove.               William W. Rucks, IV         Sedona Corporation        By:  Marco Emrich, President 
-2-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-41363

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAGOBERTO FLORES-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:12-CR-409-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dagoberto FloresMartinez (Flores) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores has not filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-41363 Document: 00512969784 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2015
No. 13-41363

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-41363 Document: 00512969784 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/16/2015
Exhibit 31.1.  CERTIFICATION  I, R. Allan Bradley, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2007;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. [intentionally omitted];  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    November 6, 2008 /s/R. Allan Bradley R. Allan Bradley President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1630.48 Class 4-A-A: Registrant who has performed military service for a foreign nation.

In Class 4-A-A shall be placed any registrant who, while an alien, has served on active duty for a period of not less than 12 months in the armed forces of a nation determined by the Department of State to be a nation with which the United States is associated in mutual defense activities and which grants exemptions from training and service in its armed forces to citizens of the United States who have served on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States for a period of not less than 12 months; *Provided:* That all information which is submitted to the Selective Service System concerning the registrant's service in the armed forces of a foreign nation shall be written in the English language.

[52 FR 24456, July 1, 1987]
#### § 57.12084 Branch circuit disconnecting devices.

Disconnecting switches that can be opened safely under load shall be provided underground at all branch circuits extending from primary power circuits near shafts, adits, levels and boreholes.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Hoffman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Hoffman               
|Michael J. Hoffman                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer



May 10, 2005
##### 



THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Six MonthsEnded June 30
    
    
    Twelve Months Ended December 312006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001(Millions of Dollars)Earnings:Pretax earnings
    
    $
    171
    
    
    $
    426
    
    
    $
    214
    
    
    $
    397
    
    
    $
    534
    
    
    $
    320Fixed charges
    
    
    156
    
    
    
    280
    
    
    
    294
    
    
    
    294
    
    
    
    322
    
    
    
    314Net earnings
    
    $
    327
    
    
    $
    706
    
    
    $
    508
    
    
    $
    691
    
    
    $
    856
    
    
    $
    634Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    148
    
    
    $
    267
    
    
    $
    280
    
    
    $
    284
    
    
    $
    319
    
    
    $
    306Adjustments
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    8Fixed charges
    
    $
    156
    
    
    $
    280
    
    
    $
    294
    
    
    $
    294
    
    
    $
    322
    
    
    $
    314Ratios of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.10
    
    
    
    2.52
    
    
    
    1.73
    
    
    
    2.35
    
    
    
    2.66
    
    
    
    2.02
#### John Oettl, Appellant, v. Morris Brecher et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Kessler-Wohl Associates, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of plaintiff’s fall into an excavation made for a large multiple dwelling project, in which action the defendants (respondents), who are the general contractors, and two- subcontractors asserted cross complaints against each other, the plaintiff appeals: (1) from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 17, 1958, upon the jury’s verdict after trial, as is in favor of the defendants Brecher and Wohl, the general contractors, against plaintiff, and in favor of the defendant Tully & Di Napoli, Inc., one of the subcontractors, against plaintiff; and (2) from so much of said judgment as dismisses the complaint against defendant H. & M. Concrete Construction Corp., the other subcontractor, after inquest against such subcontractor. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         201,148
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  152,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               426,377
<PP&E>                                         130,975
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,701,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,296,516
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       336,210
<OTHER-SE>                                    (982,193)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,701,661
<SALES>                                      6,538,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,538,520
<CGS>                                        4,128,364
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,025,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                743,374
<INCOME-TAX>                                   193,265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            550,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   550,109
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Accountability Office

# AGENCY:

Government Accountability Office (GAO).

# ACTION:

Request for letters of nomination and resumes.

# SUMMARY:

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and gave the Comptroller General responsibility for appointing its members. GAO is now accepting nominations for MedPAC appointments that will be effective May 2021. Nominations should be sent to the email address listed below. Acknowledgement of submissions will be provided within a week of submission.

# DATES:

Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted no later than February 12, 2021, to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of nominees prior to appointment.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit letters of nomination and resumes to                         *MedPACappointments@gao.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Gregory Giusto at (202) 512-8268 or                         *giustog@gao.gov*                         if you do not receive an acknowledgement or need additional information. For general information, contact GAO's Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800.                    

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1395b-6.

Gene L. Dodaro,

Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2020-28480 Filed 1-7-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. James Haynes. (B) The People of the State of New York v. John Wesley Sawyer. (C) The People of the State of New York v. William Harris.

Concur Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Eager, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.— [In each action] Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court entered herein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,616
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,772
<INVENTORY>                                      3,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,239
<PP&E>                                          16,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,815
<BONDS>                                         44,716
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         27
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,753
<SALES>                                        128,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,246
<CGS>                                           67,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,947
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,946
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,571)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5,123)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,448)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,448)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.45)
        

</TABLE>
§ 933.843 Federal enforcement. ( a ) Part 843 of this chapter, Federal Enforcement, shall when enforcement action is required for violations on surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) OSM will furnish a copy of each enforcement action and order to show cause issued pursuant to this part to the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1



                        WONDER CHINA INVESTMENTS LIMITED
                     C/O 16/F, FAR EAST CONSORTIUM BUILDING.
                     171 DES VOUEX ROAD, CENTRAL, HONG KONG



26 September 2001

New China Homes Ltd
(BY FAX)

Attention: Mr. Trevor Bedford

Dear sirs,

SALES AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT DATED 30 MARCH 2001 BETWEEN NEW CHINA
HOMES LIMITED AND WONDER CHINA INVESTMENTS LIMITED ("AGREEMENT")

Terms defined in the Agreement shall have the same meaning in this letter.

We refer to the paragraph 6.3 of the Warranties (page 22 of the Agreement) given
by you where you warrant that "the Land is able to be developed or used for
commercial use and such other purposes contemplated by the Sale Agreement." Your
failure may give rise to a claim of breach of Warranties.

As at the date of this letter. We have not received any confirmation that the
relevant authority that the Land can be used for commercial purpose. For this
reason, we propose that the due date of payment of the Promissory Note be
extended to the earlier of the the following date:

     (i)  your provision of written evidence to our satisfaction that the Land
          can be used for commercial purpose and

     (ii) the expiration of 6 months from 30 September 2001, the original due
          date of payment of the Promissory Note.

In consideration of your agreement to extend payment of the Promissory Note, we
agree that until the expiration of the periods referred to above. We shall not
take any action or lodge any claim against you for breach of Warranties under
the Agreement.

Please sign and return to us the counterpart of this letter if you agree to our
proposal.


Yours faithfully,




/s/ Steven Kwan                             /s/ Trevor Bedford
---------------                             ------------------
Director                                    Director
For and behalf of                           For and behalf of
Wonder China Investments Limited            New China Homes Ltd
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Robert Peters, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, dated June 18, 1958, which sustained that portion of a determination of the Industrial Commissioner dated August 22, 1957, ruling that claimant had withdrawn from the labor market. For approximately two years prior to June 1, 1957 claimant was employed by a textile firm in New York City as a shipping clerk, and was residing in the State of New Jersey. On that date he went on vacation for two weeks and was to return to his employment on June 17, 1957. He rented a bungalow at Liberty, New York, through September 30, 1957. He notified his employer that he would not return to work because he had moved from the area. The employer reported that claimant left his employment “ on own accord.” At a hearing claimant admitted “he did not have good cause to leave his job and was not contesting that portion of the initial determination.” Claimant filed for benefits effective as of July 8, 1957. Claimant was referred to several job openings where the work was comparable to his last employment or for which he was reasonably fitted by training and experience, and the record discloses he made some applications for work. However, the record shows that the amount of wages he demanded was considerable in excess of the prevailing rates in the vicinity where he chose to make his home, which is a resort area offering only seasonal employment. From all the evidence in the record and especially from claimant’s unsatisfactory replies to questions at the hearings, we think the board was justified in finding that claimant was not in the labor market during the period in question, and that his efforts to obtain a job were “ token efforts ” for the purpose of obtaining benefits. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.