alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1915 Training and qualification of persons working on diesel-powered equipment. ( a ) To be qualified to perform maintenance, repairs, examinations and tests on diesel-powered equipment, as required by § 75.1914, a person must successfully complete a training and qualification program that meets the requirements of this section. A person qualified to perform these tasks shall be retrained as necessary to maintain the ability to perform all assigned diesel-powered equipment maintenance, repairs, examinations and tests.
( b ) A training and qualification program under this section must: ( 1 ) Be presented by a competent instructor;
( 2 ) Be sufficient to prepare or update a person's ability to perform all assigned tasks with respect to diesel-powered equipment maintenance, repairs, examinations and tests;
( 3 ) Address, at a minimum, the following: ( i ) The requirements of subpart T of this part;
( ii ) Use of appropriate power package or machine checklists to conduct tests to ensure that diesel-powered equipment is in approved and safe condition, with acceptable emission levels;
( iii ) Proper maintenance of approved features and the correct use of the appropriate maintenance manuals, including machine adjustments, service, and assembly;
( iv ) Diesel-powered equipment fire suppression system tests and maintenance;
( v ) Fire and ignition sources and their control or elimination, including cleaning of the equipment;
( vi ) Safe fueling procedures and maintenance of the fuel system of the equipment; and
( vii ) Intake air system maintenance and tests.
( 4 ) Include an examination that requires demonstration of the ability to perform all assigned tasks with respect to diesel-powered equipment maintenance, repairs, examinations and tests; and
( 5 ) Be in writing. The written program shall include a description of the course content, materials, and teaching methods for initial training and retraining.
( c ) *Recordkeeping.* The operator shall maintain a copy of the training and qualification program required by this section and a record of the names of all persons qualified under the program. ( 1 ) The record of the names of qualified persons shall be made in a manner that is not susceptible to alteration, or recorded electronically in a computer system that is secure and not susceptible to alteration.
( 2 ) The training and qualification program and record of qualified persons are to be kept at surface location of the mine and made available for inspection by an authorized representative of the Secretary and by miners' representatives.
#### § 933.778 Permit applications—minimum requirements for legal, financial, compliance, and related information.

Part 778 of this chapter, *Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Legal, Financial, Compliance and Related Information,* shall apply to any person who applies for a permit to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.

[52 FR 13812, Apr. 24, 1987]
#### § 921.784 Underground mining permit applications—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan.

Part 784 of this chapter, *Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct underground coal mining operations.
Exhibit 32


                                 WATERCHEF, INC

                                                       1007 Glen Cove Avenue
                                                       Glen Head, New York 11545
                                                       Phone: (516) 666-0069
                                                       Fax (516) 666-9095


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.s.c. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OP THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of WaterChef, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David A. Conway, as
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Operating Officer), herby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     I.   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     2.   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



                                            /s/  David A. Conway
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 David A. Conway President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 (Principal Operating Officer)
                                                 February 26, 2003
### §99. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 2, 1940, ch. 508, §6, 54 Stat. 714, was transferred to section 701 of the former Appendix to this title and subsequently repealed by act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2023334EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 22.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/12 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11177 – PFIZER / SEAGEN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 334/06)

1.

On 14 September 2023, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2023334EN.01001201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Pfizer Inc. (‘Pfizer’) (USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Seagen Inc. (‘Seagen’) (USA). |

Pfizer will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Seagen.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Pfizer is a pharmaceutical company active worldwide in the research, development, manufacturing and marketing of medicines in various areas, including oncology, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Seagen is a biotechnology company that develops and commercialises targeted therapies to treat cancer. Seagen’s efforts are exclusively in oncology. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11177 – PFIZER / SEAGEN

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: mailto: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2023334EN.01001201-E0001)  
[OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

FNB Corp.

Asheboro, North Carolina



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-72686, 333-54702, 333-99333, 333-105442 and 333-109450) on Forms S-8 and the registration statement (No. 33-59565) on Form S-3 of
FNB Corp. and Subsidiaries of our report dated April 19, 2005 with respect to managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included herein.



LOGO



April 29, 2005

Sanford, North Carolina
§ 955.16 Reciprocity. ( a ) *Grant of certificate.* OSM shall grant an OSM blaster certificate through reciprocity to any qualified applicant who demonstrates that he or she, and whom OSM finds, holds a current State blaster certificate granted by a State regulatory authority under an OSM-approved State blaster certification program. An applicant for a certificate through reciprocity need not otherwise demonstrate that he or she meets the age, experience, knowledge, competence, training or examination requirements of this part.
( b ) *Subsequent certificate.* ( 1 ) Any person who holds an OSM blaster certificate granted through reciprocity may qualify for a subsequent certificate either through reciprocity or by meeting directly the applicable requirements of this part for certificate issuance, renewal or reissuance.
( 2 ) OSM shall not recognize a certificate granted through reciprocity as qualifying an applicant for certificate issuance, renewal or reissuance.
#### In re POST.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 29, 1905.)

In the matter of the removal of Henry H. Post from the offices of trustee of the village of Gouverneur, N. Y., and president of the board of water commissioners of said village.

PER CURIAM.

Application denied, on the ground that, although the petition is not in form on information and belief, the affidavits submitted on thé part of the said Post show that the petitioners could not have had personal knowledge of the facts therein stated; no supporting affidavits having been served upon said Post.
###### Editorial Note on Part 817

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 817 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 817.99 Slides and other damage.

At any time a slide occurs which may have a potential adverse effect on public, property, health, safety, or the environment, the person who conducts the underground mining activities shall notify the regulatory authority by the fastest available means and comply with any remedial measures required by the regulatory authority.

[44 FR 15422, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017]
#### STRONG, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL RY. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 20, 1903.)

Action by Bushnell Strong against the International Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### Geraldine C. Ruddy, Appellant, v. Robert M. Ruddy, Respondent.

Order entered December 11, 1961, modifying the judgment of separation dated February 23, 1960, by reduction of the weekly payments to plaintiff in said judgment provided, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the provisions of said judgment for payment to plaintiff of sums aggregating $75 per week are reinstated as of March 14, 1961, and plaintiff is granted a counsel fee of $250, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. Order entered February 14, 1962 unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of striking all provisions for stay of execution, and otherwise affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. Defendant has failed to establish satisfactorily such a change in his financial circumstances as would justify either reducing the alimony and support provisions originally recited in the judgment of separation or conditionally staying the judgment for arrears. In so concluding we have taken cognizance of the fact that the business firm in which defendant is employed and in which he has a substantial interest is entirely controlled by himself and members of his immediate family. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                        13723107
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              23800000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   59833473
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        10441627
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          10420255
<LOANS>                                      298488650
<ALLOWANCE>                                    4654234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               420580878
<DEPOSITS>                                   365950588
<SHORT-TERM>                                   4784000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            4472328
<LONG-TERM>                                    3448172
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       4424440
<OTHER-SE>                                    36649820
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               420580878
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               26758857
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4104976
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                627135
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              31490968
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            13016821
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            13443894
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         18047074
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  1423656
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                5373
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               11721414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7860701
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     5108440
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5108440
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.93
<LOANS-NON>                                     902000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1044000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                2773000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3446762
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   671962
<RECOVERIES>                                    455778
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              4654234
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           4654234
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Louis P. Scheps, the President and
Chief Executive Officer and Jeffery A. Baird, the Chief Financial Officer of CAS
Medical Systems, Inc., (the "issuer"), do hereby certify that the report on Form
10-KSB accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.



/s/ Louis P. Scheps
-----------------------------------
Louis P. Scheps
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
March 26, 2004





/s/ Jeffery A. Baird
-----------------------------------
Jeffery A. Baird
Chief Financial Officer
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
March 26, 2004
#### § 934.12 State program amendments disapproved.

The following provision of an amendment to the North Dakota permanent regulatory program, as submitted to OSMRE on February 10, 1987, and modified on August 18, 1987, and December 14, 1987, is hereby disapproved: Paragraph (c)(4) of the North Dakota Administrative Code, Article 69-05.2-12-05.1, which would have established separate financial criteria for self-bonding by rural electric cooperatives.

[53 FR 2840, Feb. 2, 1988. Redesignated at 55 FR 1819, Jan. 19, 1990]
§ 72.510 Miner health training. ( a ) Operators must provide annual training to all miners at a mine who can reasonably be expected to be exposed to diesel emissions on that property. The training must include— ( 1 ) The health risks associated with exposure to diesel particulate matter;
( 2 ) The methods used in the mine to control diesel particulate matter concentrations;
( 3 ) Identification of the personnel responsible for maintaining those controls; and
( 4 ) Actions miners must take to ensure the controls operate as intended.
( b ) ( 1 ) An operator must keep a record of the training at the mine site for one year after completion of the training. An operator may keep the record elsewhere if the record is immediately accessible from the mine site by electronic transmission.
( 2 ) Upon request from an authorized representative of the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or from the authorized representative of miners, mine operators must promptly provide access to any such training record. Whenever an operator ceases to do business, that operator must transfer the training records, or a copy, to any successor operator who must maintain them for the required period.
#### Village of Downers Grove, appellee, v. Jacob Glos, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,323.

Proceeding to foreclose for unpaid special assessments. Decree for foreclosure. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Du Page county; the Hon. William J. Fulton, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1924.

Decree approved.

Opinion filed March 27, 1925.

John R. O’Connor and Alben F. Bates, for appellant.

A. B. Snow, C. D. Knight and A. R. Patton, for appellee; Samuel J. Howe, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 842.13 Right of entry. ( a ) Each authorized representative of the Secretary conducting a Federal inspection under § 842.11: ( 1 ) Shall have a right of entry to, upon, and through any coal exploration or surface coal mining and reclamation operation without advance notice or a search warrant, upon presentation of appropriate credentials;
( 2 ) May, at reasonable times and without delay, have access to and copy any records, and inspect any monitoring equipment or method of exploration or operation required under the applicable program; and,
( 3 ) Shall have a right to gather physical and photographic evidence to document conditions, practices or violations at the site.
( b ) No search warrant shall be required with respect to any activity under paragraph (a) of this section, except that a search warrant may be required for entry into a building.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00521-CV

Carmen Lizarraga d/b/a Carmen & Co., Appellant

v.

C. Sue Sharpe as Trustee of the Robert Dale Tindle Jr. Special Needs Trust, Appellee

FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-18-000909, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on September 16, 

2019. On September 17, 2019, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to 

her failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial-court clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s 

record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit 

a status report regarding this appeal by September 27, 2019. Further, the notice advised appellant

that her failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of 

prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s

notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to 

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court 

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed 
2

without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established 

that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because 

appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s 

record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: October 31, 2019
### §403m. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403m, comprising section 13 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, act June 20, 1949, ch. 227, was editorially reclassified as section 3513 of this title.
# C_2023318EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11111 – UBS / CREDIT SUISSE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 318/01)

On 25 May 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11111. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11111. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---