alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §302102. Inclusion of properties on National Register

(a) In General.—A property that meets the criteria for National Historic Landmarks established pursuant to section 302103 of this title shall be designated as a National Historic Landmark and included on the National Register, subject to the requirements of section 302107 of this title.

(b) Historic Property on National Register on December 12, 1980.—All historic property included on the National Register on December 12, 1980, shall be deemed to be included on the National Register as of their initial listing for purposes of this division.

(c) Historic Property Listed in Federal Register of February 6, 1979, or Prior to December 12, 1980, as National Historic Landmarks.—All historic property listed in the Federal Register of February 6, 1979, or prior to December 12, 1980, as National Historic Landmarks are declared by Congress to be National Historic Landmarks of national historic significance as of their initial listing in the Federal Register for purposes of this division and chapter 3201 of this title, except that in the case of a National Historic Landmark district for which no boundaries had been established as of December 12, 1980, boundaries shall first be published in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3191.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302102 | 16 U.S.C. 470a(a)(1)(B). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §101(a)(1)(B), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 915; Pub. L. 91–383, §11, as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1942; Pub. L. 93–54, §1(d), July 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 139; Pub. L. 96–205, title VI, §608(a)(1), (2), Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 92; Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §201(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2988; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(29), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584; Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(d)(2)(F), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4196. |

Section

In subsection (c), the words "had been established as of December 12, 1980" are substituted for "have been established" for clarity.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9895 

To limit the availability of Federal financial assistance for entities that 

aid or facilitate illegal immigration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2024 

Mr. GAETZ (for himself, Ms. BOEBERT, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. 

BURLISON, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. OGLES, and Mr. 

BIGGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To limit the availability of Federal financial assistance for 

entities that aid or facilitate illegal immigration, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blocking Assistance 

5 and Resources to Restrict Illegal Entry and Residency Act 

6 of 2024’’ or the ‘‘BARRIER Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9895 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 

2 FOR ENTITIES THAT AID OR FACILITATE IL3 LEGAL IMMIGRATION. 

4 Beginning in the first fiscal year that begins after 

5 the date of enactment of this Act, an entity (including a 

6 nongovernmental organization and a corporation) is ineli7 gible to receive any Federal financial assistance (as such 

8 term is defined in section 7501(a)(5) of title 31, United 

9 States Code) if the entity aids or facilitates the entry of 

10 aliens into the United States in violation of the immigra11 tion laws (as such term is defined in section 101 of the 

12 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)), in13 cluding by providing, promoting, or advertising, transpor14 tation, shelter, financial support, or legal assistance— 

15 (1) to aliens attempting to enter the United 

16 States in violation of the immigration laws; or 

17 (2) to aliens who are present in the United 

18 States without lawful status under the immigration 

19 laws. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Sol S. H. Sabot, Appellant, v. City Civil Service Commission of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

Order, dated April 6, 1960, denying petitioner’s application for an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur- — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ. [23 Misc 2d 200.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FORM 10-K AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           6,280,407
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          3,268,718
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     12,706
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>            3,886,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  7,168,026
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         367,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               367,278
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        9,812,437
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             155,671
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             157,829
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>       (3,011,689)
<NET-ASSETS>                    6,800,748
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                 324,624
<OTHER-INCOME>                      4,241
<EXPENSES-NET>                    889,431
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (560,566)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           36,934
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>      (1,100,488)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>          (1,624,120)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>         2,158
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>         (1,736,336)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>             165,379
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   945,346
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            7,668,916
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  67
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (3)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    64
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                        12
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is
not allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with
the Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-KSB
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,681,773
<SECURITIES>                                 5,472,564
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,514,949
<PP&E>                                       1,673,133
<DEPRECIATION>                               (393,692)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,304,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          854,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        120
<COMMON>                                        37,384
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,394,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,304,829
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,795
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,232,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,052,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,052,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,052,841)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)


</TABLE>
§ 150.1 Name and seal. ( a ) The titles of the Courts of Criminal Appeals of the respective services are: ( 1 ) “United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals.”
( 2 ) “United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals.”
( 3 ) “United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals.”
( 4 ) “United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals.”
( b ) Each Court is authorized a seal in the discretion of the Judge Advocate General concerned. The design of such seal shall include the title of the Court.
#### § 581.1 Purpose and applicability.

The purpose of these regulations is to establish procedures under which the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) will exercise the authority granted to administer a leasing program for minerals other than oil, gas, and sulphur in the OCS. The rules in this part apply exclusively to leasing activities for minerals other than oil, gas, and sulphur in the OCS pursuant to the Act.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shirley B. Whitaker, Vice-President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Shirley B. WhitakerShirley B. WhitakerVice-President


Date:    May 10,
2011
<TABLE>

                                               EXHIBIT 11

                                         DYNCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                COMPUTATIONS OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                             (Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)

<CAPTION>

                                                 Three Months Ended             Nine Months Ended
                                              September 25, September 26,   September 25, September 26,
                                                  1997          1996            1997          1996

 PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED
<S>                                          <C>           <C>             <C>            <C>
 Earnings:
    Earnings from continuing operations          $4,087        $3,241          $8,433        $9,035
    Discontinued operations                           -             -               -           865
                                                 -------       -------         -------       -------
    Net earnings                                  4,087         3,241           8,433         9,900
    Preferred stock Class C dividends not
       declared or recorded                           -          (583)              -        (1,675)
                                                 -------       -------         -------       -------
    Common stockholders' share of earnings       $4,087        $2,658          $8,433         $8,225
                                                 =======       =======         =======       =======

 Shares:
    Weighted average common shares
       outstanding                            8,927,654     8,415,946       8,792,461      8,464,517
    Common stock issuable upon exercise
       of warrants                            1,402,734     3,235,658       1,772,124      3,248,117
    Common stock issuable upon exercise
       of stock options                         127,377        34,486         129,652         12,291
                                             -----------   -----------     -----------   -----------
                                             10,457,765    11,686,090      10,694,237     11,724,925
                                             ===========   ===========     ===========   ===========

 Earnings from continuing operations           $   0.39      $   0.23        $   0.79       $   0.63
 Discontinued operations                              -             -               -           0.07
                                                --------      --------        --------      --------
 Common stockholders' share of earnings        $   0.39      $   0.23        $   0.79       $   0.70
                                                ========      ========        ========      ========

</TABLE>
#### Jackson D. Leonard, Respondent, v. William Shayne, Also Known as William Furman, Defendant, and Seymour T. Kaplan, Also Known as “Sy” Myers, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order, entered on February 11, 1964, denying defendants-appellants’ motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice to take the deposition of defendant William Shayne, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The circumstances present in the instant case must be distinguished from that where a party, examined before trial, wishes to make corrections or changes in the transcript of his deposition before signing it. In such a ease the provisions of subdivision (a) of 3116 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules would govern, and any changes in form or substance desired to be made would be entered upon the deposition with a statement of the reasons for making them. Here there was no claim that the deposition theretofore taken of defendant Shayne contained answers inadvertently uttered or incorrectly transcribed. The record reflects that Shayne’s recollection of events vacillated with the changes of his employment with defendant Kaplan Jewelers, Inc., and the concomitant matrimonial difficulties with his wife, who, too, was an employee of Kaplan Jewelers, Inc. Serious charges are made in the papers as to the causes prompting Shayne’s desire to change his testimony. Those charges need not be resolved at this time. However, the picture presented showed a situation of extraordinary circumstances suggesting a relaxation of the rule against taking further depositions after a statement of readiness had been filed. It would have been more appropriate for plaintiff to have applied for an order, based on affidavits, rather than to proceed by a notice of examination. Defendant’s motion to vacate, however, sufficed to make a record to support the court’s denying the motion to vacate the notice and to direct the further examination of Shayne to proceed. In affirming the denial of the motion to vacate and to suppress the deposition thereafter taken, we do so on the condition that if, at the trial, any party reads part of any one of Shayne’s depositions, any other party shall be permitted to use the remainder or any portion of the remainder of any of the depositions. We make the condition explicit, even though it may, in any event, be implicit in the provisions of subdivision (fo) of 3117 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. Settle order on notice fixing date for examination to proceed. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BLANCA ESTELA CHICAS-DE 

QUINTANILLA, et al., 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-72738 

Agency Nos. A208-380-927 

A208-380-928 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Blanca Estela Chicas-De Quintanilla and her minor daughter, natives and 

citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ 

(“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-72738 

denying their application for asylum and denying Chicas-De Quintanilla’s 

application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention 

Against Torture (“CAT”).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-

85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Petitioners failed 

to establish that they would be persecuted on account of a protected ground. See 

Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be 

free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang 

members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus, Petitioners’ asylum claim 

and Chicas-De Quintanilla’s withholding of removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection

because Chicas-De Quintanilla failed to show it is more likely than not she will be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El 

Salvador. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
§ 886.16 After OSM approves my grant, what responsibilities do I have? ( a ) When we award your grant, we send you a written grant agreement stating the terms of the grant.
( b ) After you are awarded a grant, you may assign functions and funds to other Federal, State, or local agencies. However, we will hold you responsible for the overall administration of that grant, including the proper use of funds and reporting.
( c ) The grant award constitutes an obligation of Federal funds. You accept the grant and its conditions once you initiate work under the agreement or draw down awarded funds.
( d ) Although we have approved the grant agreement, you must not expend any construction funds until you receive a written authorization to proceed with reclamation on the individual project. Our Authorization to Proceed ensures that both you and we have taken all actions necessary to ensure compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*) and any other applicable laws, clearances, permits, or requirements.
( e ) You must enter coal problems in the AML inventory before you expend funds on design or construction activities for a site. We must approve any amendments to the AML inventory made after December 20, 2006. For purposes of this section, we define “amendment” as any coal problem added to the AML inventory in a new or existing problem area and any Priority 3 coal problem in the AML inventory that is elevated to either Priority 1 or Priority 2 status. ( 1 ) For emergency projects conducted under section 410 of SMCRA, our finding that an emergency condition exists constitutes our approval for the abandoned mine lands problem to be entered into the AML inventory.
( 2 ) We must approve amendments to the AML inventory for non-emergency coal problems before you, the State or Indian tribe, begin project development or design or use funds for construction activities. In projects where development and design is minimal, this approval may occur during the Authorization to Proceed process.
( f ) To the extent technologically and economically feasible, you must use fuel other than petroleum or natural gas for all public facilities that are planned, constructed, or modified in whole or in part with abandoned mine land grant funds.
( g ) You must not expend more funds than we have awarded. Our award of any grant does not commit or obligate the United States to award any continuation grant or to enter into any grant revision, including grant increases to cover cost overruns.
**Exhibit No. 32.1**

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark S. Newman, ChiefExecutive Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of DRS Technologies, Inc.
| February 9, 2006 | /s/ MARK S. NEWMAN        |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|
|                  | Mark S. Newman            |
| * *              | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRSTECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHEDTO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

----