alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §60301. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) Geospatial information.—The term "geospatial information" means knowledge of the nature and distribution of physical and cultural features on the landscape based on analysis of data from airborne or spaceborne platforms or other types and sources of data.

(2) High resolution.—The term "high resolution" means resolution better than five meters.

(3) Institution of higher education.—The term "institution of higher education" has the meaning given the term in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)).

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3423.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60301 | 42 U.S.C. 16671. | Pub. L. 109–155, title III, §311, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2920. |

Section
# C_2008064EN.01006301.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/63

---

Order of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 14 January 2008 — Fédération Internationale des Maisons de l'Europe v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-417/03) (1)

1

(2008/C 64/102)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 6.3.2004.

1

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

VAIKALAFI LUTUI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-50542

D.C. No. 5:10-cr-00075-VAP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013** 

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Vaikalafi Lutui appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the

24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of probation. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

JUN 24 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-50542

Lutui contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to explain

adequately why it imposed a sentence within the Guidelines range applicable to his

underlying offense instead of the Chapter 7 Guidelines range. He further argues

that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors, including his rehabilitation. We review for plain

error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir.

2010), and find none. When sentencing a probation violator, the district court may

rely either on the Guidelines range governing the original offense or on the

Guidelines policy statements governing probation violations. See United States v.

Plunkett, 94 F.3d 517, 519 (9th Cir. 1996). The record indicates the district court

considered both sentencing ranges and the section 3553(a) factors, and adequately

explained the sentence. 

Lutui also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because

of his demonstrated commitment to rehabilitation. The district court did not abuse

its discretion in imposing Lutui’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38,

51 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the section 3553(a)

sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See id.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 1662.20 The FOIA Exemption 3: Records exempted by other statutes.

The FOIA exempts from disclosure records if another statute specifically allows or requires the agency to withhold them. The Chief FOIA Officer may use another statute to justify withholding only if it prohibits disclosure; it sets forth criteria to guide the Chief FOIA Officer's decision on releasing; or identifies types of material to be withheld.
§ 735.26 Reports. ( a ) The agency shall, for each grant made under this part, submit semiannually to the Director or his authorized designee a Financial Status Report, Form 269 for non-construction grant activities in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102, Attachment H and OSM requirements. This report shall be accompanied by a Performance Report, Form OSM-51 comparing actual accomplishments to the goals established for the period, prepared according to Attachment I of OMB Circular No. A-102 and OSM requirements. The agency shall also submit semiannually a separate Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement for Construction Programs, Form 271, and accompanying narrative performance report comparing actual accomplishments with planned goals on grant funded construction activities.
( b ) The Director or his authorized designee shall require through the grant agreement that semiannual reports describe the relationship of financial information to performance and productivity data, including unit cost information. This quantitative information will be reported on Forms OSM-51A and OSM-51B or OSM-51C, Quantitative Program Management Information, as applicable.
( c ) The Director or his authorized designee shall require that when a grant is closed out in accordance with Attachment L to Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102, the following actions are taken: ( 1 ) The grantee shall account for any property acquired with grant funds or received from the Government in accordance with the provisions of Attachment N to Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102. This may be accomplished by the submission of the Report of Government Property, Form OSM-60.
( 2 ) The grantee shall submit a final financial report and thus release OSM from obligations under each grant or cooperative agreement that is being closed out.
[47 FR 38492, Aug. 31, 1982]
Editorial Note on Part 817
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 817 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 817.45 Hydrologic balance: Sediment control measures. ( a ) Appropriate sediment control measures shall be designed, constructed, and maintained using the best technology currently available to: ( 1 ) Prevent, to the extent possible, additional contributions of sediment to stream flow or to runoff outside the permit area,
( 2 ) Meet the more stringent of applicable State or Federal effluent limitations,
( 3 ) Minimize erosion to the extent possible.
( b ) Sediment control measures include practices carried out within and adjacent to the disturbed area. The sedimentation storage capacity of practices in and downstream from the disturbed areas shall reflect the degree to which successful mining and reclamation techniques are applied to reduce erosion and control sediment. Sediment control measures consist of the utilization of proper mining and reclamation methods and sediment control practices, singly or in combination. Sediment control methods include but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Disturbing the smallest practicable area at any one time during the mining operation through progressive backfilling, grading, and prompt revegetation as required in § 817.111(b);
( 2 ) Stabilizing the backfilled material to promote a reduction of the rate and volume of runoff in accordance with the requirements of § 817.102;
( 3 ) Retaining sediment within disturbed areas;
( 4 ) Diverting runoff away from disturbed areas;
( 5 ) Diverting runoff using protected channels or pipes through disturbed areas so as not to cause additional erosion;
( 6 ) Using straw dikes, riprap, check dams, mulches, vegetative sediment filters, dugout ponds, and other measures that reduce overland flow velocity, reduce runoff volume, or trap sediment;
( 7 ) Treating with chemicals; and
( 8 ) Treating mine drainage in underground sumps.
[44 FR 15422, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44781, Sept. 30, 1983; 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017]
### §3366. Authorities of heads of other departments and agencies

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the head of any department or agency of the United States is authorized to receive and utilize funds made available to the department or agency by the Director of National Intelligence pursuant to section 3024(d)(2) of this title, as amended by subsection (a), and receive and utilize any system referred to in such section that is made available to such department or agency.

(Pub. L. 111–259, title IV, §402(b), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2709.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subsection (a), referred to in text, is subsec. (a) of section 402 of Pub. L. 111–259, title IV, Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2708, which amended section 403–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as section 3024 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 403–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification as this section.
§ 18.45 Cable reels. ( a ) A self-propelled machine, that receives electrical energy through a portable cable and is designed to travel at speeds exceeding 2.5 miles per hour, shall have a mechanically, hydraulically, or electrically driven reel upon which to wind the portable cable.
( b ) The enclosure for moving contacts or slip rings of a cable reel shall be explosion-proof.
( c ) Cable-reel bearings shall not constitute an integral part of a circuit for transmitting electrical energy.
( d ) Cable reels for shuttle cars and locomotives shall maintain positive tension on the portable cable during reeling and unreeling. Such tension shall only be high enough to prevent a machine from running over its own cable(s).
( e ) Cable reels and spooling devices shall be insulated with flame-resistant material.
( f ) The maximum speed of travel of a machine when receiving power through a portable (trailing) cable shall not exceed 6 miles per hour.
( g ) Diameters of cable reel drums and sheaves should be large enough to prevent undue bending strain on cables.
### §2528a. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXI, §3112(a), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 577

Section, Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3113, Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1743, related to readiness posture for resumption by the United States of underground nuclear weapons tests.
### Part A—Stockpile Stewardship and Weapons Production
### The Uyaijah ring structure, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

By: F. C. Dodge

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp774E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §3934. Stay or vacation of execution of judgments, attachments, and garnishments

#### (a) Court action upon material affect determination

If a servicemember, in the opinion of the court, is materially affected by reason of military service in complying with a court judgment or order, the court may on its own motion and shall on application by the servicemember—

(1) stay the execution of any judgment or order entered against the servicemember; and

(2) vacate or stay an attachment or garnishment of property, money, or debts in the possession of the servicemember or a third party, whether before or after judgment.

#### (b) Applicability

This section applies to an action or proceeding commenced in a court against a servicemember before or during the period of the servicemember's military service or within 90 days after such service terminates.

(Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, title II, §204, as added Pub. L. 108–189, §1, Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2843.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 524 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 204 of act Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, art. II, 54 Stat. 1181, related to duration and term of stays and codefendants not in service, prior to the general amendment of this Act by Pub. L. 108–189. See section 3935 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to any case not final before Dec. 19, 2003, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–189, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>		5
<MULTIPLIER>	1,000
       
<S>							<C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>					Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>					Jan-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>					Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>					12-MOS
<CASH>							  187
<SECURITIES>						    0
<RECEIVABLES>						    7
<ALLOWANCES>						    0
<INVENTORY>							    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>					        245
<PP&E>							9,629
<DEPRECIATION>						2,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>						7,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>					   70
<BONDS>							    0
<COMMON>							    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>					    0
<PREFERRED>							    0
<OTHER-SE>							7,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>				7,527
<SALES>							    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>						1,512
<CGS>								    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>						  980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>						    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>						    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>					    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>						  532
<INCOME-TAX>						    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>					  532
<DISCONTINUED>						    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>						    0
<CHANGES>							    0
<NET-INCOME>						  532
<EPS-PRIMARY>						47.63
<EPS-DILUTED>						    0
<FN>
The earnings per share data noted above refers to
net income per limited partnership unit.
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptical Computers and Space TechnologyThe rapidly increasing demand for greater speed and efficiency on the information superhighway requires significant improvements over conventional electronic logic circuits. Optical interconnections and optical integrated circuits are strong candidates to provide the way out of the extreme limitations imposed on the growth of speed and complexity of nowadays computations by the conventional electronic logic circuits. The new optical technology has increased the demand for high quality optical materials. NASA's recent involvement in processing optical materials in space has demonstrated that a new and unique class of high quality optical materials are processible in a microgravity environment. Microgravity processing can induce improved orders in these materials and could have a significant impact on the development of optical computers. We will discuss NASA's role in processing these materials and report on some of the associated nonlinear optical properties which are quite useful for optical computers technology.Document ID19960034332Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsAbdeldayem, Hossin A.*(Universities Space Research Association Huntsville, AL United States)*Frazier, Donald O.*(NASA Huntsville, AL United States)*Penn, Benjamin*(NASA Huntsville, AL United States)*Paley, Mark S.*(Universities Space Research Association Huntsville, AL United States)*Witherow, William K.*(NASA Huntsville, AL United States)*Banks, Curtis*(NASA Huntsville, AL United States)*Hicks, Rosilen*(NASA Huntsville, AL United States)*Shields, Angela*(NASA Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1995Subject CategoryComputer Operations And HardwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:111439NASA-TM-111439Meeting InformationMeeting: International Association of Science and Technology for Development (IASTED)Location: CairoCountry: EgyptStart Date: December 1, 1995Accession Number96N30195Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960034332.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### New York Mobile Homes Association et al., Appellants, v. Thomas B. Steckel, as Supervisor of the Town of Chili, et al., Respondents.

Judgment and order unanimously modified to strike therefrom the provisions that the complaint 'be dismissed, and as so modified, affirmed, with costs to respondents. Memorandum: The ultimate conclusion of the trial court was correct but this being an action for a declaratory judgment the complaint should not have been dismissed. (22 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 33, p. 771.) The individual plaintiff had standing to attack the constitutionality of the statute and we treat as surplusage the statement to the contrary in the opinion of the trial court. (Appeal from judgment and order of Monroe Equity Term declaring the statute in question to be constitutional and dismissing the complaint. Trial had before Brasser, J., was received in evidence.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
# C_2023339EN.01001001.xml

| 26.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/10

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2023/1598, and Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012, as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1593, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau apply

(2023/C 339/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annexes II and III to Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision 2023/1598 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 (3), as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1593, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (4).

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/285/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 should continue to apply to those persons.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, by 26 December 2023, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG RELEX 1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG RELEX 1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

e-mail: mailto:sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 36.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 196, 4.8.2023, p. 23.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 119, 4.5.2012, p. 1.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 196, 4.8.2023, p. 1.

4

---
### §306114. Documentation of decisions respecting undertakings

With respect to any undertaking subject to section 306108 of this title that adversely affects any historic property for which a Federal agency has not entered into an agreement pursuant to regulations issued by the Council, the head of the agency shall document any decision made pursuant to section 306108 of this title. The head of the agency may not delegate the responsibility to document a decision pursuant to this section. Where an agreement pursuant to regulations issued by the Council has been executed with respect to an undertaking, the agreement shall govern the undertaking and all of its parts.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3228.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 306114 | 16 U.S.C. 470h–2(l). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §110(l), as added Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4012(3), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4761; Pub. L. 106–208, §5(a)(8), May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 319. |

Section

The words "historic property" are substituted for "property included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register" because of the definition of "historic property" in section 300308 of the new title. The words "to document a decision pursuant to this section" are substituted for "pursuant to such section" for clarity. The language was not intended to limit agency authority to delegate responsibilities under section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Public Law 89–665, 80 Stat. 917). The words "agreement pursuant to regulations issued by the Council" are substituted for "a section 106 memorandum", and the word "agreement" is substituted for "memorandum", for clarity and for consistency in the new section.
#### § 933.785 Requirements for permits for special categories of mining.

Part 785 of this chapter, *Requirements for Permits for Special Categories of Mining,* shall apply to each person who makes application for a permit to conduct certain categories of surface coal mining and reclamation operations as specified therein.
# C_2008197EN.01003502.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/35

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 June 2008 — Katalagarianakis v Commission

(Case T-402/03) (1)

1

(2008/C 197/61)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 7.2.2004.

1

---