alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9921 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9921

To amend the Delta Development Act to include the parish of Terrebonne 
                  as a Delta Regional Authority area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2024

 Mr. Graves of Louisiana (for himself and Mr. Scalise) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
   and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Financial 
Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Delta Development Act to include the parish of Terrebonne 
                  as a Delta Regional Authority area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELTA REGIONAL AUTHORITY AREAS.

    Section 4(2)(D) of the Delta Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3121 note; 
Public Law 100-460) is amended by inserting ``Terrebonne,'' after 
``Webster,''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB REPORT OF INFORETECH WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,473
<PP&E>                                         316,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                (60,735)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,412,254
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,989
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,073,784)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   349,459
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (3,373,122)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,373,122)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,373,122)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,373,122)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
§ 922.772 Requirements for coal exploration. ( a ) Part 772 of this chapter, *Requirements for Coal Exploration,* shall apply to any person who conducts or seeks to conduct coal exploration operations.
( b ) The Office shall make every effort to act on an exploration application within 60 days of receipt or such longer time as may be reasonable under the circumstances. If additional time is needed, OSMRE shall notify the applicant that the application is being reviewed, but that more time is necessary to complete such review, setting forth the reasons and the additional time that is needed.
[52 FR 13810, Apr. 24, 1987]
§ 1698.2 Requests for advisory opinions. ( a ) Any male born after December 31, 1959 who has attained 18 years of age may request an advisory opinion as to his liability to register under MSSA. A parent or guardian of such person who is unable to make a request for an advisory opinion may request an advisory opinion for him. Any Federal, state or municipal governmental agency may request an advisory opinion as to the liability of any male person born after December 31, 1959 who has attained 18 years of age to register under MSSA.
( b ) Requests for advisory opinions shall be in writing and addressed to Director of Selective Service, ATTN: SIL, P.O. Box 94638, Palatine, IL 60094-4638. With respect to the person concerning whom an advisory opinion is requested, the following should be furnished: full name, address, date of birth, Social Security Account Number, basis for the opinion that the registration requirement is inapplicable to him, and, if applicable, basis for his assertion that his failure to register “. . . was not a knowing and willful failure to register.”
[52 FR 24460, July 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 47670, Aug. 3, 2000]
# C_2023060EN.01001001.xml

| 17.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/10

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
  )

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 60/08)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2023) 884 | 10 February 2023 | Chromium trioxide
  EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0 | Husqvarna AB, EM-OFPM/ErK, 56182, Huskvarna, Sweden | REACH/23/2/0 | Industrial use of a mixture containing chromium trioxide in functional chrome plating of saw chain cutter links in order to meet stay-sharp and durability requirements for use with chainsaws | 31 December 2032 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2023) 884

10 February 2023

Chromium trioxide

EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0

Husqvarna AB, EM-OFPM/ErK, 56182, Huskvarna, Sweden

REACH/23/2/0

Industrial use of a mixture containing chromium trioxide in functional chrome plating of saw chain cutter links in order to meet stay-sharp and durability requirements for use with chainsaws

31 December 2032

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)

---
#### McCarthy, Respondent, v. YONKERS R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 16, 1903.)

Action by Charles H. McCarthy, Jr., by Charles H. McCarthy, his guardian ad litem, against the Yonkers Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Consumers' Cooperatives in 1941

              																	Parker, Florence E. (Florence Evelyn). 						*Consumers' Cooperatives in 1941 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 703*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1942,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4205,			accessed on September 19, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999, and at 89 FR 38293, May 7, 2024.

#### § 982.506 Negotiating rent to owner.

The owner and the family negotiate the rent to owner. At the family's request, the PHA must help the family negotiate the rent to owner.

[63 FR 23861, Apr. 30, 1998. Redesignated at 64 FR 26648, May 14, 1999]
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 CITY OF RIO RANCHO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. NO. 32,914 4 ALEXIS HASSLEY, 5 Defendant-Appellant, 6 City of Rio Rancho 7 Gina R. Manfredi 8 Rio Rancho, NM 9 for Appellee 10 Patrick J. Martinez 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 for Appellant 13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 14 John F. Davis, District Judge 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 GARCIA, Judge. 172 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of proposed 1 disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time 2 for doing so has expired. 3 {2} REVERSED. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 7

WE CONCUR: 8

9 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 10

11 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 12
#### WEIXELBAUM, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Helena Weixelbaum, as administratrix, against the New York City Railway Company. C. F. Brown, for appellant. C. Steekler, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment modified, by striking out extra allowance, and the judgment, as so reduced to the sum of $1,379.84, and order appealed from, affirmed, with costs of appeal.

McLaughlin, j., dissents.
# C_2011204EN.01002802.xml

| 9.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/28

---

Order of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Van Bennekom v Council and Commission

(Case T-206/96) (1)

1

2011/C 204/51

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 8.3.1997.

1

---
### §2953. Reports to Congress on additional employee requirements

(a) Each report, recommendation, or other communication, of an official nature, of an Executive agency which—

(1) relates to pending or proposed legislation which, if enacted, will entail an estimated annual expenditure of appropriated funds in excess of $1,000,000;

(2) is submitted or transmitted to Congress or a committee thereof in compliance with law or on the initiative of the appropriate authority of the executive branch; and

(3) officially proposes or recommends the creation or expansion, either by action of Congress or by administrative action, of a function, activity, or authority of the Executive agency to be in addition to those functions, activities, and authorities thereof existing when the report, recommendation, or other communication is so submitted or transmitted;

shall contain a statement, concerning the Executive agency, for each of the first 5 fiscal years during which each additional or expanded function, activity, or authority so proposed or recommended is to be in effect, setting forth the following information—

(A) the estimated maximum additional—

(i) man-years of civilian employment, by general categories of positions;

(ii) expenditures for personal services; and

(iii) expenditures for all purposes other than personal services;

which are attributable to the function, activity, or authority and which will be required to be effected by the Executive agency in connection with the performance thereof; and

(B) such other statement, discussion, explanation, or other information as is considered advisable by the appropriate authority of the executive branch or that is required by Congress or a committee thereof.

(b) Subsection (a) of this section does not apply to—

(1) the Central Intelligence Agency;

(2) a Government controlled corporation; or

(3) the Government Accountability Office.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 413; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 642a. | Jan. 16, 1883, ch. 27, §11; added July 25, 1956, ch. 730, §1, 70 Stat. 652. |

Statutes at Large

In subsection (a), the words, "Executive agency" are substituted for "department, agency, or independent establishment of the executive branch of the Federal Government (including any corporation wholly owned by the United States)" in view of the definition of "Executive agency" in section 105. The exception of "a Government controlled corporation" is subsection (b) (2) is added to preserve the application to corporations wholly owned by the United States.

The exception of "the General Accounting Office" in subsection (b)(3) is added to preserve application to the executive branch.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office".
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis Vadura, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


March 14, 2005                                     /s/ Dennis Vadura
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                       Dennis Vadura
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
### SUBCHAPTER II—RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF AGENCIES AND LABOR ORGANIZATIONS
AQ-PLN-96:063 

### W~5~1 

# ~

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Fife Symington, Governor Russell F. Rhoades, Director

March 12, 1996

Ms. Felicia Marcus Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Mail Code

- RA 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 Dear Ms. Marcus: SUBJECT: Commitment to correct deficiencies in the Arizona New Source Review 

### and

Title V programs This letter constitutes the formal commitment of the State of Arizona to correct certain deficiencies identified by U.S.E.P.A. Region IX with respectto the operating permits programs submitted to the Region on November 15, 1993, in accordance with the requirements ofTitle V of the Clean Air Act; and revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) governing major modifications and new majorstationary sources ofairpollutionsubmittedtothe Region onAugust 

### 15, 1994, in accordance with the requirements ofTitle I ofthe Act. ADEQ hereby commits to make the following revisions to is rules governing operating permits under Title V ofthe Act:

• Revise AAC R18-2-101(61)(b)(i) in the definition, “Major Source”, to clarify that all fugitive emissions ofhazardous air pollutants will be taken into account fordetermining the status ofa stationary source as major under Section 112 ofthe Clean AirAct.

• ReviseAAC 

### Ri8-2-306(A)(10) to clarifythatemissionstrading betweensources is allowed without a permit revision unless prohibited under an applicable implementation plan. ADEQ hereby commits to make the following revisions to its rules governing approvals to constructfor new major sources and major modifications underTitle I ofthe Act:

3033 North CentralAvenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85012, (602)207-2300Page 2

Ms. Felicia Marcus March 12, 1996 AQ-PLN-96:063

• Revise AAC R18-2-401(9)(a) in defmition of “Major Source” to include thresholds applicable in serious and severe ozone nonattainmentareas forpotential to emit oxides of nitrogen that are identical to those for volatile organic compounds, to comply with the requirements of §~182(c), (d) and (f) ofthe Act.

• Revise AAC R18-2-404(L) to comply with Section 173(a) of the Act, to require that emissions offsets be enforceable atthe time ofpermit issuance. All ofthe aforementioned rule revisions are currently in process, and scheduled to be fmal and in effectby November, 1996. They will be submittedto U.S.E.P.A. Region IX for approval at that time. Thankyou for your consideration in 

### this matter. Ifyou have any questions, please call Nancy Wrona at (602) 207-2308, or Ira Domsky at (602) 207-2365. Sincerely,



## ~ 

# 4/?~~4/

Russell
~. Rhoades Director RFR:IMD:vjm
cc: Nancy Wrona Ira Domsky Debbie Jordan Matt Haber
§ 77.1010 Collaring holes. ( a ) Starter steels shall be used when collaring holes with hand-held drills.
( b ) Men shall not hold the drill steel while collaring holes, or rest their hands on the chuck or centralizer while drilling.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Ruth Howard Borrero, Appellant, v. Gerald Howard, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from order of Cattaraugus Special Term dismissing the writ of habeas corpus but granting permission to relator to visit her children at certain hours.) Present— Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus Supplement of MS Structured TILES Series 2006-1 for the offering of Treasury Index LinkEd Securities (TILESsm) Series 2006-1 due February 15, 2034 (which Prospectus Supplement will form part of Registration Statement No. 333-101155 of MS Structured Asset Corp. on Form S-3 in relation to the TILES Series 2006-1 securities) of our report dated February 7, 2005 (October 12, 2005 as to the effects of discontinued operations and segment classification discussed in Note 27) relating to the consolidated financial statements of Morgan Stanley and included in Exhibit 99.1 to Morgan Stanley’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 12, 2005, and our reports dated February 7, 2005 for (1) the related financial statement schedule included in Schedule I and (2) management’s report of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, each included in Morgan Stanley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2004 (which reports (1) express an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule and include an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SPAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123,” in 2003, (2) express an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment regarding the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and (3) express an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting), and to the references to us as “experts” in the Prospectus Supplement.

 

/s Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York

February 6, 2006
§ 795.8 Application approval and notice. ( a ) If the program administrator finds the applicant eligible, he or she shall inform the applicant in writing that the application is approved.
( b ) If the program administrator finds the applicant ineligible, he or she shall inform the applicant in writing that the application is denied and shall state the reasons for denial.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection withAmendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the “Report”) to the Annual Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, I, H. R. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: April 30, 2007 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NorthPittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### DIVISION A—HISTORIC PRESERVATION