alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1741

WILLIAM W. HAMMONDS,

Petitioner,

versus

ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(97-1015-BLA)

Submitted: July 21, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William W. Hammonds, Petitioner Pro Se. Mary Rich Maloy, JACKSON

& KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia; Christina P. Barber, Gary K.

Stearman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order and order on reconsideration affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30

U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1998). Our review of the

record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Hammonds v. Island Creek Coal

Co. No. 97-1015-BLA (B.R.B. Mar. 31 & May 6, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur C. Schultz, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person, will be treated as a motion to dispense with printing. Motion granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file five copies of his brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the November 1960 Term; appeal ordered to be placed on the calendar for November 7, 1960. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Anthony F. Marra, Esq., 100 Centre Street, New York 13, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCOT-12-0000678 

26-SEP-2012 

10:55 AM 

NO. SCOT-12-0000678
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I


 ARWIN R. ECHINEQUE, Petitioner,
 

vs.
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.
 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
 

ORDER
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
 

On September 10, 2012, plaintiff Arwin R. Echineque
 

filed a complaint in this court. This court, however, lacks
 

jurisdiction to consider the complaint. See HRS § 602-5 (Supp.
 

2011). Therefore,
 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate 

court shall not accept any further filings in this case. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 26, 2012. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
#### § 57.7028 Hand clearance.

Persons shall not rest their hands on the chuck or centralizer while drilling.
#### § 57.7009 Drill helpers.

If a drill helper assists the drill operator during movement of a drill to a new location, the helper shall be in sight of, or in communication with, the operator at all times.
#### § 57.7804 Refueling.

When rotary jet piercing equipment requires refueling at locations other than fueling stations, a system for fueling without spillage shall be provided.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Theodore Burrell, Appellant, against J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

— -Appeal from application for writ of habeas corpus which was denied on the grounds the court was without jurisdiction. The basis of the application concerned petitioner’s inability to perfect his original appeal as he was unable to obtain a copy of the stenographic minutes of his trial. Habeas corpus is not the proper remedy for the relief sought. Order unanimously affirmed. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40006 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RAMIRO VARGAS, JR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-888-ALL
Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * RamiroVargas, Jr. appeals hisjury verdict conviction for transmitting in interstate or foreign commerce a communication containing a threat to injure the person of another in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c). He argues on appeal that: (1) the evidenc

e produced at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict because his actual l aptop computer was never produced at trial, and there was no mention that the laptop had been damaged by an electrical surge prior to its seizure; and (2) his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 8, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-40006

2 failing to request production ofthe laptop and by failing toassert that the laptop had been damaged. Examination ofthe record indicates that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to thejury verdict, a rational trier of fact could have found that the Government proved all of the essential elements of Vargas’s crime beyond
a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Morales, 272 F.3d 284, 287 (5th Cir. 2001); United States v. Lankford, 196 F.3d 563, 575 (5th Cir. 1999). Moreover, we do not consider Vargas’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel because he did not raise them in district court and the present record is insuff iciently developed to resolve them. See United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9792 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9792

To provide appropriations for the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 during 
          the first lapse in appropriations in a fiscal year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2024

 Mrs. Sykes (for herself, Ms. Brown, and Ms. McClellan) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide appropriations for the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 during 
          the first lapse in appropriations in a fiscal year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Feed Our Families Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. APPROPRIATIONS FOR SNAP DURING FIRST LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS IN 
              A FISCAL YEAR.

    In the case of any fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2024, 
there is appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, such sums as are necessary to carry out the Food and 
Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) for the first 90-day 
period beginning on the first day of a lapse in discretionary 
appropriations for carrying out such Act for such fiscal year: 
Provided, That such funds shall be placed in reserve for use only in 
such amounts and at such times as may become necessary to carry out 
program operations: Provided further, That such funds shall remain 
available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER I—AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         666,212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  454,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    162,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,352,609
<PP&E>                                       3,475,516
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,081,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,904,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,438,731
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,861,000
<PREFERRED>                                     80,000
<COMMON>                                       200,935
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,806,762)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,904,850
<SALES>                                     17,665,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,665,689
<CGS>                                       11,475,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,093,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (32,717)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             277,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                327,721
<INCOME-TAX>                                   203,772
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            327,721
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   123,949
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

As independent public accountants, I hereby consent to the incorporation of my
reports on the financial statements and schedules of Airship International Ltd,
dated August 22, 1997, to be included in this annual report on Form 10-K, which
includes an explanatory paragraph describing matters giving rise to substantial
doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
 
                                          Charlie M. Meeks, C.P.A., P.A.
                                          Charlie M. Meeks, C.P.A., P.A.
 
Maitland, Florida
August 22, 1997


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Community Financial Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jody D. Graybill, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.



|                     |  |     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jody D. Graybill         
|                     |  |     |  | Jody D. Graybill, President  
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
wv
a USGS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

science fora changing world U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1411-A

Thickness and lithology of the Weber-De Chelly zone—PLATE 16

{eldon, A... 2002, Geology of Pelegzic rocks in the Upper Coloradg River Basin in
Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, excluding the San Juan Basin

TENSLEEP
SANDSTONE

SCHOOLHOUSE
MEMBER OF
MAROON
FORMATION

BOUNDARY

FRYINGPAN
MEMBER OF
MAROON
FORMATION

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO

S . RIVER BASIN
2.) °?

Springs

37°

Navajo

Reservoir ue

NO DATA

1:2,000,000

t)) 25 50 75 100 MILES
L | | 1 J

fF

0

T T T T
25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS

STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE AND THICKNESS

Rock Spring
9

“<Gredn River

bming Gorge
Reservoir

5

BOUNDARY =

P= 37°
Navajo :

Reservoir VA

AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY }

te
— 107°

¢

S %,

ee

ante

;

1:2,000,000

(0) 25 50 75 100 MILES
a | 1 | |
(0)

T T T T
25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS

LITHOLOGY

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO
RIVER BASIN

EXPLANATION

ape \| Area where Weber—De Chelly zone is missing because of erosion or non-
deposition or thrust under Precambrian rocks

e Borehole with lithologic log used to prepare map

+ Measured surface stratigraphic section used to prepare map

Stratigraphic Nomenclature and Thickness

= Area where Weber-De Chelly zone crops out (generalized)

—7200— Line of equal thickness—Location is approximate in central Wyoming because
of sparse control. Interval is 200 feet, except near Bluff, Utah, and in
Wyoming, where interval is 100 feet, and in the Strawberry Valley area of Utah,
where interval is 2,000 feet

Approximate boundary between component geologic units

T ——T' Location of stratigraphic cross section shown in figures 44 and 45

Lithology

Predominantly white, light-gray, tan, and orange quartz sandstone, with
conglomerate layers and less than 10 percent shale, limestone, and
dolomite

Pes Predominantly white, light-gray, tan, and orange quartz sandstone, with
10-30 percent shale interbeds

a Predominantly white, light-gray, tan, and orange quartz sandstone, with
10-30 percent limestone and dolomite interbeds

Approximate boundary between lithofacies

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. base map, 1:2,500,000

IN ARIZONA, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, UTAH, AND WYOMING
By
Arthur L. Geldon

ONnNnYNO

STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE, THICKNESS, AND LITHOLOGY OF THE WEBER-DE CHELLY ZONE OF THE CANYONLANDS AQUIFER IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN AND VICINITY
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20458

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS IBARRA-MALDONADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CR-37-ALL

--------------------

December 12, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis

Ibarra-Maldonado has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). IbarraMaldonado has received a copy of counsel’s motion, brief, and

supplemental brief, but has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the briefs and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
# C_2023130EN.01000401.xml

| 14.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/4

---

Notice for the attention of the natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/756, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/755 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2023/C 130/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/756 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/755 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of those persons, entities and bodies is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 1 June 2023.

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 100 I, 13.4.2023, p. 4.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 100 I, 13.4.2023, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9816 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9816

To revise the dollar amount limitations for rural housing repair loans 
 under section 504 of the Housing Act of 1949, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2024

    Mr. Davis of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. Nunn of Iowa) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To revise the dollar amount limitations for rural housing repair loans 
 under section 504 of the Housing Act of 1949, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Housing Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. SECTION 504 RURAL HOUSING REPAIR LOANS.

    Section 504(a) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1474(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking the third sentence and inserting the 
        following: ``The maximum aggregate amount of outstanding loans 
        under this section to one household for one dwelling shall not 
        exceed $80,000, the maximum aggregate amount of grants under 
        this section to one household for one dwelling shall not exceed 
        $20,000, and the maximum aggregate amount of loans and grants 
        under this section to one household for one dwelling shall not 
        exceed $100,000.''; and
            (2) in the fourth sentence, by striking ``$7,500'' and 
        inserting ``$15,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

U.S. House of Representatives 

114th Congress 

The OPM Data Breach: How the Government Jeopardized Our 

National Security for More than a Generation 

Majority Staff Report 

Hon. Jason Chaffetz, Chairman 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

Hon. Mark Meadows, Chairman 

Subcommittee on Government Operations 

Hon. Will Hurd, Chairman 

Subcommittee on Information Technology 

September 7, 2016

www.oversight.house.gov
§ 906.20 Approval of Colorado abandoned mine land reclamation plan. The Colorado Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan, as submitted on February 16, 1982, and as subsequently revised, is approved effective June 11, 1982. Copies of the approved plan are available at: ( a ) Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Minerals and Geology, 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203.
( b ) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Western Regional Coordinating Center, Technical Library, 1999 Broadway, Suite 3320, Denver, Colorado 80202-5733.
[60 FR 54593, Oct. 25, 1995]
#### § 947.823 Special performance standards—operations on prime farmland.

Part 823 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Operations on Prime Farmland,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations on prime farmland.
Exhibit No. 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ronald W. Jibson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR CORPORATION   February 28, 2011 /s/Ronald W. Jibson Ronald W. Jibson President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 937.800 General requirements for bonding of surface coal mining and reclamation operations.

Part 800 of this chapter, *General Requirements for Bonding of Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations Under Regulatory Programs,* shall apply to all surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Respondent

v.

DOUGLAS BRUNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 318 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.