alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.2


 


Fifth
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
fifth AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”),
is entered into as of August 30, 2022 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Chris Chapman, M.D. (“Employee”)
and MyMD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purpose of amending that certain Employment Agreement,
dated as of November 1, 2020, and as amended on December 18, 2020, January 8, 2021, February 10, 2021, and November 24, 2021, by and
between Employee and the Company (the “Agreement”). Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters
that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS,
Section 16 of the Agreement provides that no waiver or modification of any provision of the Agreement will be enforceable unless it is
agreed to in writing by the party against which enforcement would be sought; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties mutually desire to modify certain provisions that would otherwise apply to Bonus Compensation potentially payable to Employee
pursuant to the Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 16 of the Agreement, in consideration of the mutual provisions, conditions, and covenants contained
herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


In
Exhibit B to the Agreement, Bonus Compensation, paragraph 5 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:


 


“5)
Bonus Compensation of $100,000 cash to be paid in lump-sum cash upon the completion of the following Bonus Event: the establishment of
a formal relationship with the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute to advance, participation in and/or support of the use of MYMD-1 in ocular
disease preclinical or clinical applications provided that the nature and/or extent of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute relationship is
satisfactory in the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.”


 


[Remainder
of the Page Intentionally Left Blank;


Signature
Page Follows]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the Effective Date.


 


	 	EMPLOYEE:
    
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Chris Chapman, M.D.
	 	Chris Chapman, M.D.
	 	 	 
	 	THE
    COMPANY: 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Paul M. Rivard
	 	Name:	Paul
    M. Rivard
	 	Title:	Executive
    Vice President
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1314 Sheathed explosive units. ( a ) A separate instantaneous detonator shall be used to fire each sheathed explosive unit.
( b ) Sheathed explosive units shall be primed and placed in position for firing only by a qualified person or a person working in the presence of and under the direction of a qualified person. To prime a sheathed explosive unit, the entire detonator shall be inserted into the detonator well of the unit and be held securely in place.
( c ) Sheathed explosive units shall not be primed until immediately before the units are placed where they are to be fired. A sheathed explosive unit shall not be primed if it is damaged or deteriorated.
( d ) Except in anthracite mines, rock dust shall be applied to the roof, ribs and floor within a 40-foot radius of the location where the sheathed explosive units are to be fired.
( e ) No more than three sheathed explosive units shall be fired at one time.
( f ) No sheathed explosive unit shall be fired in contact with another sheathed explosive unit.
§ 723.16 Waiver of use of formula to determine civil penalty. ( a ) The Director, upon his own initiative or upon written request received within 15 days of issuance of a notice of violation or a cessation order, may waive the use of formula contained in 30 CFR 723.13 to set the civil penalty, if he or she determines that, taking into account exceptional factors present in the particular case, the penalty is demonstrably unjust. However, the Director shall not waive the use of the formula or reduce the proposed assessment on the basis of an argument that a reduction in the proposed penalty could be used to abate violations of the Act, this chapter, any applicable program, or any condition of any permit or exploration approval. The basis for every waiver shall be fully explained and documented in the records of the case.
( b ) If the Director waives the use of the formula, he or she shall use the criteria set forth in 30 CFR 723.13(b) to determine the appropriate penalty. When the Director has elected to waive the use of the formula, he or she shall give a written explanation of the basis for the assessment made to the person to whom the notice or order was issued.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputation of Sound Generated by Viscous Flow Over a Circular CylinderThe Lighthill acoustic analogy approach combined with Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes is used to predict the sound generated by unsteady viscous flow past a circular cylinder assuming a correlation length of 10 cylinder diameters. The two-dimensional unsteady flow field is computed using two Navier-Stokes codes at a low Mach number over a range of Reynolds numbers from 100 to 5 million. Both laminar flow as well as turbulent flow with a variety of eddy viscosity turbulence models are employed. Mean drag and Strouhal number are examined, and trends similar to experiments are observed. Computing the noise within the Reynolds number regime where transition to turbulence occurs near the separation point is problematic: laminar flow exhibits chaotic behavior and turbulent flow exhibits strong dependence on the turbulence model employed. Comparisons of far-field noise with experiment at a Reynolds number of 90,000, therefore, vary significantly, depending on the turbulence model. At a high Reynolds number outside this regime, three different turbulence models yield self-consistent results.Document ID19970017057Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCox, Jared S.*(George Washington Univ. Hampton, VA United States)*Rumsey, Christopher L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Brentner, Kenneth S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Younis, Bassam A.*(City Univ. London,  United Kingdom)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1997Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110339NASA-TM-110339Accession Number97N19417Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 533-31-21-04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970017057.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 942.843 Federal enforcement.

Part 843 of this chapter, *Federal Enforcement,* shall apply regarding enforcement action on coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9941 

To provide that any United States Government identification document issued 

for an illegal alien is not sufficient to meet the identification document 

requirement for acquiring a firearm from a Federal firearms licensee, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2024 

Mr. CLYDE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that any United States Government identification 

document issued for an illegal alien is not sufficient 

to meet the identification document requirement for acquiring a firearm from a Federal firearms licensee, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Guns for Illegal 

5 Aliens Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9941 IH

1 SEC. 2. INSUFFICIENCY OF IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS 

2 ISSUED FOR AN ILLEGAL ALIEN IN MEETING 

3 THE IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT REQUIRE4 MENT FOR ACQUIRING A FIREARM FROM A 

5 FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEE. 

6 Section 922(t)(1)(D) of title 18, United States Code, 

7 is amended by inserting ‘‘, other than an identification 

8 document issued for an alien (as defined in section 101(a) 

9 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

10 1101(a))) who has not been admitted (as so defined),’’ be11 fore ‘‘of the transferee containing’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### §60126. Annual reports

(a) In General.—The Secretary shall submit a report to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, and annually thereafter, on—

(1) the Secretary's implementation of section 60121, including—

(A) a list of all applications received in the previous calendar year;

(B) a list of all applications that resulted in a license under section 60121;

(C) a list of all applications denied and an explanation of why each application was denied, including any information relevant to the interagency adjudication process of a licensing request;

(D) a list of all applications that required additional information; and

(E) a list of all applications whose disposition exceeded the 120 day deadline established in section 60121(c), the total days overdue for each application that exceeded such deadline, and an explanation for the delay;

(2) all notifications and information provided to the Secretary under section 60122; and

(3) a description of all actions taken by the Secretary under the administrative authority granted by paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) of section 60123(a).

(b) Classified Annexes.—Each report under subsection (a) may include classified annexes as necessary to protect the disclosure of sensitive or classified information.

(c) Sunset.—The reporting requirement under this section terminates effective September 30, 2020.

(Added Pub. L. 114–90, title II, §201(a), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 719.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 114–90, which was approved Nov. 25, 2015.
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–54, §2(a)(20), Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 382, added heading for subchapter I.
#### HIDDEN, Respondent, v. GODFREY et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

*1130Action by Thomas B. Hidden against Frederick S. Godfrey and others.

No opinion. Motion denied.
#### HEINRICH v. VAN WRICKLER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 11, 1903.)

1 Replevin — Previous Demand — Sufficiency

A sufficient demand necessary to support replevin of a chattel held by defendant under a contract of conditional sale is not shown by proof of a demand on third persons not having custody or control of the property, or of a statement by the officer serving the replevin papers, made after breaking a door in accomplishing their service, that he had them.

Appeal from municipal court, borough of Queens, Second district.

Action by Frederick W. Heinrich against Jessie Van Wrickler From a judgment for defendant entered on a dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, he appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before GOODRICH, P. J., and BARTLETT, WOODWARD, and HIRSCHBERG, JJ.

William Morris, for appellant.

Fred G. De Witt, for respondent. .

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit in replevin for the recovery of a piano in the possession of the defendant under a contract of conditional sale. As such possession was lawfully acquired, it was necessary for the plaintiff to prove a demand for the return of the chattel in order to maintain proceedings and an action in replevin. This he failed to do, and the municipal court justice dismissed the complaint on account of this defect in the proof. While there was evidence of a demand, it was of a demand addressed, not to the defendant herself, but to a person or persons not shown to have any custody or control of the property. The so-called demand made by the marshal upon the defendant personally appears to have been nothing more than a statement to the effect that he had replevin papers to replevy the piano, after he had broken in her door in order to gain access to it. The judgment should be affirmed.

Judgment of the municipal court affirmed, with costs.
Medidas de Seguridad para Proteger a los Trabajadores 

de los Atrapamientos/Inmersiones en Contenedores de

Granos Húmedos

Las condiciones meteorológicas húmedas aumentan el riesgo de que los trabajadores se queden sumergidos

en los contenedores de grano. La humedad causa que los granos se adhieran a las paredes del contenedor.

Los trabajadores que intentan caminar sobre el puente para hacer los granos fluir pueden quedar enterrados 

si el puente ceda o se cause una avalancha por el peso del trabajador. 

Siga estos pasos para prevenir los atrapamientos:

 Nunca camine sobre los granos para hacerlos fluir. 

 Use una varilla o sistemas de vibración para dividir los granos desde una ubicación segura fuera 

del contenedor. 

 Ofrezca capacitación y proporcione arneses corporales con salvavidas a los trabajadores y oros equipos 

de salvavidas. 

 Desconecte, bloquee y etiquete las maquinarias para asegurar que estén apagadas de manera segura,

especialmente a los equipos para mover los granos (como taladros).

 Antes de entrar al contenedor, pruebe la calidad del aire del contenedor para asegurar que haya suficiente 

oxígeno y ningún gas toxico o inflamable. 

 Tenga una persona capacitada en el rescate que pueda observar desde afuera y estar en contacto 

constante con el trabajador. 

La página web de OSHA sobre Medidas de Seguridad en el Manejo de Granos ofrece información sobre cómo 

reconocer y prevenir los peligros relacionados con el manejo de grano, incluyendo un aviso y una hoja informativa. 

Los patronos pueden beneficiar del Programa de Consulta en el Lugar de OSHA para obtener ayuda 

confidencial y sin costo para empresas pequeñas o medianas con el fin de establecer y mejorar los programas 

de salud y seguridad. Los servicios de consulta son distintos a las inspecciones de cumplimiento y no resultan 

en multas o citaciones. Los Centros de Educación del Instituto de Capacitación de OSHA ofrecen cursos 

diseñados para trabajadores, patrones y gerentes sobre la identificación de riesgos de seguridad y salud y 

formas para reducirlos. Estos centros de educación están convenientemente localizados alrededor del país.

Los avisos de OSHA se emiten en ocasiones para llamar la atención a 

asuntos y medidas de seguridad y salud de los trabajadores.

 • osha.gov/grainhandling • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

OSHA 3988-04R 2020
Exhibit 24.3

 

SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

                        The undersigned director of WLR Foods, Inc., a Virginia corporation, and its subsidiaries(WLR Foods) appoints James L. Keeler and Dale S. Lam, or either of them (with fullpower to each of them to act alone) as his attorney-in-fact and agent for him in hiscapacity as a director of WLR Foods, and authorizes such persons, on behalf of WLR Foodsor on his behalf individually, to sign and file any and all WLR Foods' registrationstatements, reports, schedules and other filings, and all amendments thereto, required orpermitted to be filed under federal or state securities laws, including without limitationForms 3, 4 and 5, registration statements, Form 10-K annual reports,Form 10-Q quarterly reports and Form 8-K current reports, with all exhibits andany and all documents required to be filed with respect thereto, with the Securities andExchange Commission, National Association of Securities Dealers, and any regulatoryauthority for any U.S. state or territory, and he hereby ratifies and confirms all thathis attorneys-in-fact and agents or each of them may lawfully do or cause to be done byvirtue hereof.

                        WITNESS the following signatures and seals.

 

                        March 7, 2000                                                        /s/ Marie C. Johns           (SEAL)                                 Date                                                                                MarieC. Johns
#### § 947.845 Civil penalties.

Part 845 of this chapter, *Civil Penalties,* shall apply when civil penalties are assessed for violations on surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 1, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00170

- CR

Devin Blake Espinoza, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES , JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record

and the partie s’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district

court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment

. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Lorus Therapeutics Inc (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ended May 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I Jim A. Wright, Chief
Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:


1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



By:  /s/ Jim A. Wright
     --------------------------------------------------
     Jim A. Wright
     Chief Executive Officer




Date:  December 13, 2002
       -----------------------------------
§ 933.774 Revision; renewal; and transfer, assignment, or sale of permit rights. ( a ) Part 774 of this chapter, *Revision; Renewal; and Transfer, Assignment, or Sale of Permit Rights,* shall apply to any such actions involving surface coal mining and reclamation operations permits.
( b ) Any revision to the approved permit will be subject to review and approval by OSMRE. ( 1 ) Significant revisions shall be processed as if they are new applications in accordance with the public notice and hearing provisions of §§ 773.6, 773.19(b) (1) and (2), and 778.21 and of part 775.
( 2 ) OSMRE shall make every effort to approve or disapprove an application for permit revision within 60 days of receipt or such longer time as may be reasonable under the circumstances. If additional time needed, OSMRE shall notify the applicant that the application is being reviewed, but that more time is necessary to complete such review, setting forth the reasons and the additional time that is needed.
( c ) In addition to the requirements of part 774 of this chapter, any person having an interest which is or may be adversely affected by a decision on the transfer, assignment, or sale of permit rights, including an official of any Federal, State, or local government agency, may submit written comments on the application to the Office within thirty days of either the publication of the newspaper advertisement required by § 774.17(b)(2) of this chapter or receipt of an administratively complete application, whichever is later.
[52 FR 13811, Apr. 24, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 79672, Dec. 19, 2000]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Select List of References on the Monetary Question

              																	Library of Congress. Division of Bibliography. 						*Select List of References on the Monetary Question*,										1913,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/143,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 1605.52 Composition of local boards.

The Director of Selective Service shall prescribe the number of members of local boards.
#### § 62.140 Dual hearing protection level.

If during any work shift a miner's noise exposure exceeds the dual hearing protection level, the mine operator must, in addition to the actions required for noise exposures that exceed the permissible exposure level, provide and ensure the concurrent use of both an ear plug and an ear muff type hearing protector. The following table sets out mine operator actions under MSHA's noise standard.

| Provision | Condition | Action required by the mine operator |
| --- | --- | --- |
| § 62.120 | Miner's noise exposure is less than the action level | None. |
| § 62.120 | Miner's exposure equals or exceeds the action level, but does not exceed the permissible exposure level (PEL) | Operator enrolls the miner in hearing conservation program (HCP) which includes (1) a system of monitoring, (2) voluntary, with two exceptions, use of operator-provided hearing protectors, (3) voluntary audiometric testing, (4) training, and (5) record keeping. |
| § 62.130 | Miner's exposure exceeds the PEL | Operator uses/continues to use all feasible engineering and administrative controls to reduce exposure to PEL; enrolls the miner in a HCP including ensured use of operator-provided hearing protectors; posts administrative controls and provides copy to affected miner; must never permit a miner to be exposed to sound levels exceeding 115 dBA. |
| § 62.140 | Miner's exposure exceeds the dual hearing protection level | Operator enrolls the miner in a HCP, continues to meet all the requirements of § 62.130, ensures concurrent use of earplug and earmuff. |