alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), or his or her successor, the authorities that are vested in the Secretary of Health and Human Services under title III, Section 307, “International Cooperation,” of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, [42 U.S.C. 242 l], as amended, with regard to participating with other countries in cooperative endeavors.

## Limitation

This delegation of authority may be re-delegated within ONC. Previous delegations and re-delegations made to officials within the Department of Health and Human Services for authorities under Section 307 of the PHS Act continue in effect. Exercise of this authority shall be in accordance with established policies, procedures, guidelines, and regulations as prescribed by the Secretary. The Secretary retains the authority to submit reports to Congress, promulgate regulations, and to establish advisory committees and councils and appoint their members. I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the National Coordinator, ONC, or other ONC officials, which involve the exercise of this authority prior to the effective date of this delegation.

## Effective Date

This delegation of authority is effective immediately.

## Authority

Section 6 of the Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1953 and Section 2 of the Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1966.

Dated: December 9, 2020.

Eric D. Hargan,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-27606 Filed 12-15-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
§ 905.816 Performance standards—Surface mining activities. ( a ) Part 816 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Surface Mining Activities,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface mining activities, except for § 816.116(a)(1) regarding revegetation success standards, for which paragraph (c) of this section substitutes.
( b ) All operators shall comply with the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, Cal. Pub. Res. Code section 13000 *et seq.;* the California Water Code section 1200 *et seq.;* the California Air Pollution Control Laws, Cal. Health & Safety Code section 39000 *et seq.;* the Hazardous Waste Control Law, Cal. Health & Safety Code section 25100 *et seq.;* the State Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances Law, Cal. Health & Safety Code section 25280 *et seq.;* the Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Act of 1972, Cal. Gov. Code section 66770 *et seq.;* the California Environmental Quality Act, Cal. Pub. Res. Code section 21000; the California Coastal Act of 1976, Cal. Pub. Res. Code section 30000 *et seq.;* the Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973, Cal. Pub. Res. Code section 4511 *et seq.;* the California Public Resources Code section 4656; and regulations promulgated pursuant to these laws.
( c ) Standards for success shall be those identified in § 816.116(a)(2) of this chapter. Statistically valid sampling techniques for measuring success shall be included in the mining and reclamation plan, and approved by the regulatory authority.
### §403t. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403t, comprising section 20 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, act June 20, 1949, ch. 227, was editorially reclassified as section 3520 of this title.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9743 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 

traveling expenses for Federal disaster relief workers away from home 

for more than 1 year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi (for himself and Ms. SEWELL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

deduction for traveling expenses for Federal disaster relief workers away from home for more than 1 year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deployed Emergency 

5 Professionals Lasting Over a Year Tax Relief Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘DEPLOY Tax Relief Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9743 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR TRAVELING EXPENSES FOR FED2 ERAL DISASTER RELIEF WORKERS AWAY 

3 FROM HOME FOR MORE THAN 1 YEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 162(a) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘or is cer6 tified by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 

7 Management Agency as traveling on behalf of the United 

8 States in temporary duty status to respond to a federally 

9 declared disaster (as defined in section 165(i)(5)(A))’’ 

10 after ‘‘a Federal crime’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 74.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Accuracy:* the ability of a continuous personal dust monitor (CPDM) to determine the “true” concentration of the environment sampled. Accuracy describes the closeness of a typical measurement to the quantity measured, although it is defined and expressed in terms of the relative discrepancy of a typical measurement from the quantity measured. The accuracy of a CPDM is the theoretical maximum error of measurement, expressed as the proportion or percentage of the amount being measured, without regard for the direction of the error, which is achieved with a 0.95 probability by the method.
( b ) *Bias:* the uncorrectable relative discrepancy between the mean of the distribution of measurements from a CPDM and the true concentration being measured.
( c ) *Coal mine dust personal sampler unit (CMDPSU):* a personal device for measuring concentrations of respirable dust in coal mine atmospheres that meets the requirements specified under Subpart B of this part.
( d ) *Continuous personal dust monitor (CPDM):* a sampling device for continuously measuring concentrations of respirable dust in coal mine atmospheres that reports within-shift and end-of shift measurements of dust concentrations immediately upon the completion of the period of exposure that was monitored and that meets the requirements specified under Subpart C of this part.
( e ) *ISO:* the International Organization for Standardization, an international standard-setting organization composed of representatives from various national standards-setting organizations. ISO produces industrial and commercial voluntary consensus standards used worldwide.
( f ) *Precision:* the relative variability of measurements from a homogeneous atmosphere about the mean of the population of measurements, divided by the mean at a given concentration. It reflects the ability of a CPDM to replicate measurement results.
Exhibit 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Daniel T. Meisenheimer, President of United States Basketball League,
Inc., certify that the Form 10-KSB of United States Basketball League, Inc., as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of United States Basketball League, Inc. for the periods presented.


                               /s/Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
                               ----------------------------------------
                               Name: Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
                               Date: July 10, 2006



     I, Richard C. Meisenheimer, Chief Financial Officer of United States
Basketball League, Inc., certify that the Form 10-KSB of United States
Basketball League, Inc., as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of United States Basketball League, Inc. for the periods
presented.


                               /s/Richard C. Meisenheimer
                               ----------------------------------------
                               Name: Richard C. Meisenheimer
                               Date: July 10, 2006
******Exhibit 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

First National Bank and Trust Company— 

National banking association headquartered in the State of North Carolina 

 

First National Investor Services, Inc.— 

A North Carolina corporation and operating subsidiary 

 

Premier Investment Services, Inc.— 

A North Carolina corporation and operatingsubsidiary 

 

Dover Mortgage Company— 

Mortgage banking company incorporated in the State of North Carolina 

 

FNB United Statutory Trust I— 

A Connecticut statutory business trust 

 

FNB United Statutory TrustII— 

A Delaware statutory business trust 

 

Catawba Valley Capital Trust I— 

A Delaware statutorybusiness trust 

 

Catawba Valley Capital Trust II— 

A Delaware statutory business trust
§ 886.13 What are the maximum grant amounts? ( a ) You may apply at any time for a grant of any or all of the program funds that are available to you.
( b ) We will not award an amount greater than the total funds distributed to your State or Indian tribe in the current annual fund distribution, less any previous awards of current year funds, plus any funds distributed to you in previous years but not awarded, plus any unexpended funds recovered from previous grants and made available to you under § 886.20 of this chapter.
( c ) Funds for the current fiscal year are available for award after the annual fund distribution described in § 872.13 of this chapter.
( d ) Whenever you request it, we will give you information on the amounts and types of funds that are currently available to you.
99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Clean Systems Technology Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Yona Leibowitz Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


April 30, 2003
                                                By: /s/ Yona Leibowitz
                                                Name: Yona Leibowitz
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer






<PAGE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Henry White, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant: (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered April 2, 1959, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of 20 to 30 years; and (2) from the denial by the Trial Judge of motion to set aside the verdict. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered. Defendant was tried for the crime of which he was convicted with a co defendant who had confessed his guilt. On the occasion of this defendant’s arrest he had made a statement to the arresting officer in which he admitted that he was present, outside the premises where the' robbery was committed, at the time of its commission, and that he had later received part of the proceeds of the crime. He did not admit or confess, however, that he had participated in the robbery, or that he was guilty of committing it as an accomplice. In summation, the prosecutor referred to the statements by both defendants as confessions that they had committed the crime, and argued for conviction because they had told the District Attorney they had committed it. Similarly, in his charge the learned County Judge made no distinction between the statement made by this defendant and that of his codefendant and referred to such statements as confessions by both defendants that they were guilty and that they had committed the crime charged against them in the manner described by the complainant. Although we do not doubt that all these erroneous references to the statement made by this defendant were inadvertent, nevertheless such references were highly prejudicial and require a new trial in the interests of justice *743(Code Grim. Pro., § 527). In the circumstances, the appeal from the denial of the motion is dismissed as academic. In any event, no separate appeal lies from the denial of a motion to set aside a verdict. *(People*v. *Savage,*5 A D 2d 846.) Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
# C_2023039EN.01001801.xml

| 1.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/18

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2023/C 39/05)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 13.12.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 13.12.2022 - 31.12.2022 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SRX/07D. (including special conditions: RJC/*2AC4C, RJC/*67AKD, RJC/07D., RJE/07D., RJH/*04-C., RJH/*67AKD, RJH/07D., RJM/*2AC4C, RJM/*67AKD, RJM/07D., RJN/*2AC4C, RJN/*67AKD, RJN/07D., SRX/*2AC4C and SRX/*67AKD) |
| Species | Skates and rays (Rajiformes) |
| Zone | 7d |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 14/TQ109 |

Date and time of closure

13.12.2022

Duration

13.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

SRX/07D. (including special conditions: RJC/*2AC4C, RJC/*67AKD, RJC/07D., RJE/07D., RJH/*04-C., RJH/*67AKD, RJH/07D., RJM/*2AC4C, RJM/*67AKD, RJM/07D., RJN/*2AC4C, RJN/*67AKD, RJN/07D., SRX/*2AC4C and SRX/*67AKD)

Species

Skates and rays (Rajiformes)

Zone

7d

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

14/TQ109

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael T. Vea
--------------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
March 9, 2005

/s/ Sheila A. Stoke
--------------------------------------------
Principal Accounting Officer
March 9, 2005
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20607

Summary Calendar

__________________

TIMOTHY HUGH QUEEN,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHNNY KLEVENHAGEN, Sheriff,

 Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-94-2438

- - - - - - - - - -

February 15, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Timothy Hugh Queen appeals the entry of summary judgment for

the respondent in this civil rights action alleging denial of

access to the courts. Queen contends (1) that he should not have

been required to show an actual injury resulted from a jail

policy restricting his access to the law library; (2) that his

request for injunctive relief and for issuance of a writ of

mandamus was not moot due to his transfer to another facility

because it was "capable of repetition yet evading review;" and

(3) that the district court should not have dismissed his state

constitutional claim because state law permits an inmate to 
No. 95-20607

-2-

pursue an action for equitable relief. We have carefully

reviewed the arguments and the record and AFFIRM the judgment for

essentially the reasons adopted by the district court.

AFFIRMED.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Money Disbursements of Wage Earners and Clerical Workers in Eight Cities in the East North Central Region, 1934-36

              																	Jones, Alice Hanson, 1904-1985					,	Williams, Faith M. (Faith Moors), 1893-					 and 	Wimsatt, Genevieve B. (Genevieve Beckwith), 1912-. 						*Money Disbursements of Wage Earners and Clerical Workers in Eight Cities in the East North Central Region, 1934-36 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 636*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1940,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4149,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
|         |                                            |
|---------|--------------------------------------------|
| • | The elimination of individual meeting fees |

|         |                                                                                     |
|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | An increase in the Annual Board Retainer for Board Members from $80,000 to $120,000 |

|         |                                                                                      |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | An increase in the Annual Retainer Fee for the Lead Director from $20,000 to $25,000 |

|         |                                                                                                        |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | An increase in the Annual Retainer Fee for the Chairman of the Audit Committee from $15,000 to $20,000 |

|         |                                                                                             |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | An increase in the annual non-employee stock option grant from 4,000 shares to 5,000 shares |

|         |                                                                                 |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | The elimination of the additional Audit Committee member retainer fee of $3,000 |