alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS DATED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                              329
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                       473
<ALLOWANCES>                          7
<INVENTORY>                         193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1043
<PP&E>                            15685
<DEPRECIATION>                     4457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    15038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1751
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                            270
<OTHER-SE>                         6593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      15038
<SALES>                            1066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   1066
<CGS>                               464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      1333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (7)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   85
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (260)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (260)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                       (260)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.01)



</TABLE>
Map 2-7: Alternative D

Oil and Gas Leasing Restrictions Related to

Greater Sage Grouse Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

Closed to Oil and Gas Leasing

No Surface Occupancy

Controlled Surface Use

Federal Oil and Gas Estate

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: Identified restrictions displayed on this map

are in addition to existing restrictions already

approved through previous planning efforts.
No. 7954.

#### Winland *v.*The State ex rel. Zitzman et al.

(Decided December 8, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Monroe county.

*Messrs. Hamilton & Matz,*for plaintiff in error.

*558*Messrs. Mallory & Sears; Mr. W. E. Moore; Mr. F.. A. Jeffers; Mr. E. L. Lynch*and *Mr. F. W. Ketterer,,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed. Cross-petition not considered because not printed.

Spear, Davis, Shauok, Price and Crew, JJ., concur.
Map 3-31: Bighorn Sheep

Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundaries

County Boundaries

Parturition Areas

Crucial Winter Range

Crucial Winter/Yearlong

Spring/Summer/Fall

Winter

Winter/Yearlong

Yearlong

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 00030001
- 00040002
- 00050000
- 00060000
- 00070000
- 00080000
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110003
- 00120004
- 00130000
- 00140000
- 00150000
- 00160000
- 00170000
- 00180000
- 00190005
- 00200006
- 00210007
- 00220008
- 00230009
- 00240010
- 00250011
- 00260012
- 00270013
- 00280014
- 00290015
- 00300016
- 00310017
- 00320018
- 003300bi
- 003400bc
Editorial Note on Part 783
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54956, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 783 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 783.12 General environmental resources information. Each application shall describe and identify— ( a ) The lands subject to surface coal mining operations over the estimated life of those operations and the size, sequence, and timing of the subareas for which it is anticipated that individual permits for mining will be sought; and
( b ) The nature of cultural historic and archeological resources listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and known archeological sites within the proposed permit and adjacent areas. ( 1 ) The description shall be based on all available information, including, but not limited to, information from the State Historic Preservation Officer and local archeological, historical, and cultural preservation groups.
( 2 ) The regulatory authority may require the applicant to identify and evaluate important historic and archeological resources that may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, through the— ( i ) Collection of additional information,
( ii ) Conduct of field investigations, or
( iii ) Other appropriate analyses.
[44 FR 15363, Mar. 13, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 14822, Apr. 5, 1983; 52 FR 4262, Feb. 10, 1987; 81 FR 93330, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54956, Nov. 17, 2017]
#### Samuel Sherman, Appellant, v. Leo Alexander, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Order dated February 10, 1958, which, *inter alia,*denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the defendant-respondent’s fourth counterclaim, modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of .granting the branch of the motion to dismiss the fourth counterclaim, with leave to replead, and as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. The allegations of the fourth counterclaim are barely intelligible and fail to spell out the relationship among the persons charged with conspiracy to harass the so-called cross defendant. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         629,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               854,109
<PP&E>                                         343,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                (77,026)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,120,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,145,643
<BONDS>                                      1,318,306
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,901,491
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,244,596)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,120,844
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,831,308
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,831,308)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,831,308)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,831,308)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)


</TABLE>
Appeal No. 77-123.

#### Antonio T. Fonseca *et al. v.*Serafin Silveira *et al.*

*Gunning, LaFazia & Gnys, Inc., Raymond A. LaFazia,*for defendants.

The defendants’ motion to remand this case to the Superior Court for a new trial is denied since this case has not yet been docketed in this court, without prejudice to the defendants’ filing of a proper motion pursuant to our Rule 10(c) in Superior Court.
132 STAT. 346 PUBLIC LAW 115–139—MAR. 20, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1858: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Oct. 10, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Mar. 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–139 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4514 

Williamson Trail in Liberty, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Ryan Scott 

Ostrom Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT RYAN SCOTT OSTROM POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4514 Williamson Trail in Liberty, Pennsylvania, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Ryan Scott 

Ostrom Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Ryan Scott Ostrom Post Office’’. 

Approved March 20, 2018. 

Mar. 20, 2018 

[H.R. 1858]
### §14912. Weight-bumping in household goods transportation

(a) Weight-Bumping Defined.—For the purposes of this section, "weight-bumping" means the knowing and willful making or securing of a fraudulent weight on a shipment of household goods which is subject to jurisdiction under subchapter I or III of chapter 135.

(b) Penalty.—Whoever has been found to have committed weight-bumping shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 918.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11917 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
#### § 7.402 Definitions.

The following definitions apply in this subpart.

*Component.* Any material in a cable splice kit which becomes part of a splice.

*Conductor.* A bare or insulated wire or combination of wires not insulated from one another, suitable for carrying an electric current.

*Electric Cable.* An assembly of one or more insulated conductors of electric current under a common or integral jacket. A cable may also contain one or more uninsulated conductors.

*Jacket.* A nonmetallic abrasion-resistant outer covering of a cable or splice.

*Power Conductor.* An insulated conductor of a cable assembly through which the primary electric current or power is transmitted.

*Signaling Cable.* A fiber optic cable, or a cable containing electric conductors of a cross-sectional area less than #14 AWG used where the circuit cannot deliver currents which would increase conductor temperatures beyond that established for the current-carrying capacity of the conductors.

*Splice.* The mechanical joining of one or more severed conductors in a single length of a cable including the replacement of insulation and jacket.

*Splice Kit.* A group of materials and related instructions which clearly identify all components and detail procedures used in safely making a flame-resistant splice in an electric cable.
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.1901 Diesel fuel requirements. ( a ) Diesel-powered equipment shall be used underground only with a diesel fuel having a sulfur content no greater than 0.05 percent and a flash point of 100 °F (38 °C) or greater. Upon request, the mine operator shall provide to an authorized representative of the Secretary evidence that the diesel fuel purchased for use in diesel-powered equipment underground meets these requirements.
( b ) Flammable liquids shall not be added to diesel fuel used in diesel-powered equipment underground.
( c ) Only diesel fuel additives that have been registered by the Environmental Protection Agency may be used in diesel-powered equipment underground.
#### § 157.3 Definitions.

These terms and their definitions are for the purpose of this part.

*Actionable information.* Information that potentially justifies an unfavorable credentialing determination.

*CAC.* The DoD Federal PIV card.

*Contractor.* Defined in Executive Order 13467, “Reforming Processes Related to Sustainability for Government Employment, Fitness for Contractor Employees, and Eligibility for Access to Classified National Security Information”.

*Contractor employee fitness.* Defined in E.O. 13467.

*Debarment.* A prohibition from taking a competitive service examination or from being hired (or retained in) a covered position for a specific time period..

*Drugs.* Mood and behavior-altering substances, including drugs, materials, and other chemical compounds identified and listed in 21 U.S.C. 801-830 (also known as “The Controlled Substances Act of 1970, as amended”) (e.g., marijuana or cannabis, depressants, narcotics, stimulants, hallucinogens), and inhalants and other similar substances.

*Drug abuse.* The illegal use of a drug or use of a legal drug in a manner that deviates from approved medical direction.

*Employee.* Defined in E.O. 12968, “Access to Classified Information”.

*Fitness.* Defined in E.O. 13488, “Granting Reciprocity on Excepted Service and Federal Contractor Employee Fitness and Reinvestigating Individuals in Positions of Public Trust”.

*Fitness determination.* Defined in E.O. 13488.

*Logical and physical access.* Defined in E.O. 13467.

*Material.* Defined in 5 CFR part 731.

*Reasonable basis.* A reasonable basis to believe occurs when a disinterested observer, with knowledge of the same facts and circumstances, would reasonably reach the same conclusion.

*Terrorism.* Defined in 19 U.S.C. 2331.

*Unacceptable risk.* A threat to the life, safety, or health of employees, contractors, vendors, or visitors; to the U.S. Government physical assets or information systems; to personal property; to records, including classified, privileged, proprietary, financial, and medical records; or to the privacy rights established by The Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, or other law that is deemed unacceptable when making risk management determinations.

*U.S. National.* Defined in U.S. OPM Memorandum, “Final Credentialing Standards for Issuing Personal Identity Verification Cards Under HSPD-12” (available at *http://www.opm.gov/investigate/resources/final_credentialing_standards.pdf*).
April 4, 1977.

M. P. No. 77-114.

#### Thomas A. McCormick *v.*State Board of Elections *et al.*

*Keven A. McKenna,*for petitioner.

*Stephen F. Achille,*for respondents.

Motion for stay denied pending decision of full court on petition for certiorari.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41072

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN MANUEL ROCHA-BIEYRA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-689-1

Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Manuel RochaBieyra (Rocha) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.

Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rocha has not filed a response. We have

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 18, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-41072 Document: 00512278388 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
No. 12-41072

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-41072 Document: 00512278388 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
#### § 950.30 Approval of Wyoming abandoned mine land reclamation plan.

The Wyoming Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan, as submitted on August 16, 1982, and as subsequently revised, is approved effective February 14, 1983. Copies of the approved program are available at:

Casper Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 100 East B Street, room 2128, Casper, WY 82601-1918.

State of Wyoming, Department of Environmental Quality, Abandoned Mine Lands Division, Herschler Building, Third Floor West, 122 West 25th Street, Cheyenne, WY 82002.

[57 FR 12733, Apr. 13, 1992]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    | 
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ David J. NobleDavid J. NobleChairman/DirectorPrincipal Executive OfficerAugust 11, 2006Date
### SUBCHAPTER V—SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY MATTERS
### §3329. Intelligence community contracting

#### (a) In general

The Director of National Intelligence shall direct that elements of the intelligence community, whenever compatible with the national security interests of the United States and consistent with the operational and security concerns related to the conduct of intelligence activities, and where fiscally sound, shall award contracts in a manner that would maximize the procurement of products in the United States.

#### (b) Intelligence community defined

In this section, the term "intelligence community" has the meaning given that term in section 3003(4) of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–183, title IV, §403, Dec. 4, 1991, 105 Stat. 1267; Pub. L. 111–259, title VIII, §810, Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2750.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 403–2 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior authorization act: Pub. L. 102–88, title IV, §404, Aug. 14, 1991, 105 Stat. 434.

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–259 added subsec. (b), designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, substituted "Director of National Intelligence" for "Director of Central Intelligence" and "intelligence community" for "Intelligence Community", and struck out at end "For purposes of this provision, the term 'Intelligence Community' has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph 3.4(f) of Executive Order 12333, dated December 4, 1981, or successor orders."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Enhanced Procurement Authority To Manage Supply Chain Risk

Pub. L. 112–87, title III, §309, Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1883, formerly set out as a note under this section, was transferred to section 3334e of this title.
§ 761.13 Procedures for compatibility findings for surface coal mining operations on Federal lands in national forests. ( a ) If you intend to rely upon the exception provided in § 761.11(b) to conduct surface coal mining operations on Federal lands within a national forest, you must request that we obtain the Secretarial findings required by § 761.11(b).
( b ) You may submit a request to us before preparing and submitting an application for a permit or boundary revision. If you do, you must explain how the proposed operation would not damage the values listed in the definition of “significant recreational, timber, economic, or other values incompatible with surface coal mining operations” in § 761.5. You must include a map and sufficient information about the nature of the proposed operation for the Secretary to make adequately documented findings. We may request that you provide any additional information that we determine is needed to make the required findings.
( c ) When a proposed surface coal mining operation or proposed boundary revision for an existing surface coal mining operation includes Federal lands within a national forest, the regulatory authority may not issue the permit or approve the boundary revision before the Secretary makes the findings required by § 761.11(b).
[64 FR 70833, Dec. 17, 1999]