alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
+

!

3300

3250

3350

3300

3250

3350

3250

3300

3250

3200

3300

3200

3300

3300

CO RD T

N RD F

RD 36 CO RD U

E RD 8

CO RD V

E RD 5

RD 37

E RD 4

E RD 7

E RD 2

N RD H

N RD G

N RD J

N RD L

E

RD

6

E RD 1

N RD I

N RD K

CO RD T

N RD F

RD 36 CO RD U

E RD 8

CO RD V

E RD 5

RD 37

E RD 4

E RD 7

E RD 2

N RD H

N RD G

N RD J

N RD L

E

RD

6

E RD 1

N RD I

N RD K

Little Bear Creek

Little Bear Creek

Bear Creek

Little

Bear

Creek

Bear

Creek

Bear

Creek

Mitchell

Cemetery

41

69

41

70

41

71

41

72

41

73

41

74

41

75

41

76

41

78

41

79

41

80

41

68

41

81000mN

41

69

41

70

41

71

41

72

41

73

41

74

41

75

41

76

41

77

41

78

41

79

41

80

41

68000mN

41

81

2

59 2

60 2

61 262 263 264 265 266 2

67 258 2

68000m

E

2

59 2

60 261 262 263 264 265 267 2

58000mE 2

68

380 000FEET

400 000FEET

1 680000

1 720 000

FEET

FEET

40'

42'30"

40'

42'30"

42'30" 40'

101°45' 42'30" 40'

101°45'

37°45' 37°45'

101°37'30"

101°37'30"

37°37'30" 37°37'30"

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

BIG BOW NW, KS

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

BIG BOW NW QUADRANGLE

KANSAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14S

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, July 2008

Roads..............National Transportation Dataset, 2005 - 2006

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2006

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Kansas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 38 ́

29 MILS

7° 7 ́

127 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14S

KG

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

Big

Bow NW

Syracuse

East SE

Johnson

West Big Bow

Syracuse

East SW

Big

Bow NE

Johnson

East

Syracuse

West SE

Johnson NE

KANSAS
# C_2023222EN.01003901.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/39 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Notice for the attention of the natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1218, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1216 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (2023/C 222/13) The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP ( 1 ), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1218 ( 2 ), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 ( 3 ), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1216 ( 4 ) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes. The attention of those persons, entities and bodies is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation). The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 14 July 2023. Council of the European Union General Secretariat RELEX.1 Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel BELGIQUE/BELGIË Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. ( 1 )  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16. ( 2 )  OJ L 159 I, 23.6.2023, p. 526. ( 3 )  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6. ( 4 )  OJ L 159 I, 23.6.2023, p. 335.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9918 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9918

To exclude from gross income certain relief payments to the victims of 
        the Chiquita Canyon elevated temperature landfill event.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2024

Mr. Mike Garcia of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To exclude from gross income certain relief payments to the victims of 
        the Chiquita Canyon elevated temperature landfill event.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chiquita Canyon Tax Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. CHIQUITA CANYON DISASTER RELIEF PAYMENTS.

    (a) Disaster Relief Payments to Victims of Chiquita Canyon Elevated 
Temperature Landfill Event.--Chiquita Canyon elevated temperature 
landfill event payments shall be treated as qualified disaster relief 
payments for purposes of section 139(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986.
    (b) Chiquita Canyon Elevated Temperature Landfill Event Payments.--
For purposes of this section, the term ``Chiquita Canyon elevated 
temperature landfill event payments'' means any amount received by or 
on behalf of an individual as compensation for loss, damages, expenses, 
relocation, suffering, loss in real property value, closing costs with 
respect to real property (including realtor commissions), or 
inconvenience (including access to real property) resulting from the 
Chiquita Canyon elevated temperature landfill event if such amount was 
provided by--
            (1) a Federal, State, or local government agency,
            (2) Waste Connections, Inc., or
            (3) any subsidiary, insurer, or agent of Waste Connections, 
        Inc. or any related person.
    (c) Elevated Temperature Landfill Event.--For purposes of this 
section, the term ``Chiquita Canyon elevated temperature landfill 
event'' means the elevated temperature landfill event occurring beneath 
the Chiquita Canyon Landfill in Los Angeles County, California, 
beginning on May 1, 2022.
    (d) Effective Date.--This section shall apply to amounts received 
on or after March 1, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 148.12 Definitions.

*Agency.* Any “executive agency,” as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105; any “Military department” as defined in 5 U.S.C. 102; and any other entity within the Executive Branch that comes into possession of classified information.

*Classified Information.* All information that requires protection under Executive Order 12958, or any of its antecedent orders, and the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

*Cognizant Security Agency (CSA).* Those agencies that have been authorized by Executive Order 12829 to establish an industrial security program for the purpose of safeguarding classified information disclosed or released to industry.

*Cognizant Security Office (CSO).* The office or offices delegated by the head of a CSA to administer industrial security in a contractor's facility on behalf of the CSA.

*Facility.* An activity of a government agency or cleared contractor authorized by appropriate authority to conduct classified operations or to perform classified work.

*Industry.* Contractors, licensees, grantees, and certificate holders obligated by contract or other written agreement to protect classified information under the National Industrial Security Program.

*National Security.* The national defense and foreign relations of the United States.

*Senior Agency Official.* Those officials, pursuant to Executive Order 12958, designated by the agency head who are assigned the responsibility to direct and administer the agency's information security program.
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT OF RAINS COUNT Y, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 17th

day of December , 2014 , the caus e upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

HAROLD JAYLYNN COUCH , Appellant

NO. 12

- 13

- 00127

- CR; Trial Court No. 5172

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order i n these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court

below be in all things affirmed , and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of

Tyler, thi s the 10 th day of February , 2015

.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. HUMBOLDT FULL FASHIONED HOSIERY MILLS, Inc.

No. 12031.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 18, 1954.

Supplemental Opinion March 18,1954.

Geo. J. Bott, A. Norman Somers, Rosanna Blake, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Bass, Berry & Sims, Nashville, Tenn., J. D. Senter, Jr., Humboldt, Tenn., for respondent.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order has been heard and considered on the entire record and on the oral arguments and briefs of' attorneys for the parties;

And it appearing that the labor board disagreed with the trial examiner in his finding that an employee, Mrs. Bessie K. Beasley, was not discharged in violation of the National Labor Relations Act, and ordered her reinstatement with back pay; and it being our conclusion, from consideration of the record as a whole, that the preponderance of evidence in the case gainsays the proposition that Mrs. Beasley was discharged because of activity in behalf of the union labor organization and strongly supports the conclusion that she was discharged because of her carelessness in the performance of her duties as inspector of hosiery for the ascertainment of defects in them;

The petition of the labor board for enforcement of its order directing the reinstatement, with back pay, of Mrs. Beasley is denied;

And it appearing that there is no controversy over the entry of the board’s order relating to other matters upon which it exercised jurisdiction in the cause;

The order of the board is directed to be enforced, except as to the portion relating to Mrs. Beasley.

*131Supplemental Opinion.

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

Supplementing the decision of this court entered on February 18, 1954, it appearing from a letter dated January 22, 1954, that the National Labor Relations Board has withdrawn its petition for enforcement of paragraphs 1(a) and 2(a) of the Board’s order;

It Is Now Ordered that said paragraphs 1(a) and 2(a) be and they are hereby eliminated from the Board’s order.
§ 550.204 When must I submit my IOP for proposed Arctic exploratory drilling operations and what must the IOP include? If you propose exploratory drilling activities on the Arctic OCS, you must submit an Integrated Operations Plan (IOP) to the Regional Supervisor at least 90 days prior to filing your EP. Your IOP must describe how your exploratory drilling program will be designed and conducted in an integrated manner that accounts for Arctic OCS conditions and include the following information: ( a ) A description of how all vessels and equipment will be designed, built, and/or modified to account for Arctic OCS conditions;
( b ) A schedule of your exploratory drilling program, including contractor work on critical components of your program;
( c ) A description of your mobilization and demobilization operations, including tow plans that account for Arctic OCS conditions, as well as your general maintenance schedule for vessels and equipment;
( d ) A description of your exploratory drilling program objectives and timelines for each objective, including general plans for abandonment of the well(s), such as: ( 1 ) Contingency plans for temporary abandonment in the event of ice encroachment at the drill site;
( 2 ) Plans for permanent abandonment; and
( 3 ) Plans for temporary seasonal abandonment.
( e ) A description of your weather and ice forecasting capabilities for all phases of the exploration program, including a description of how you would respond to and manage ice hazards and weather events;
( f ) A description of work to be performed by contractors supporting your exploration drilling program (including mobilization and demobilization), including: ( 1 ) How such work will be designed or modified to account for Arctic OCS conditions; and
( 2 ) Your concepts for contractor management, oversight, and risk management.
( g ) A description of how you will ensure operational safety while working in Arctic OCS conditions, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) The safety principles that you intend to apply to yourself and your contractors;
( 2 ) The accountability structure within your organization for implementing such principles;
( 3 ) How you will communicate such principles to your employees and contractors; and
( 4 ) How you will determine successful implementation of such principles.
( h ) Information regarding your preparations and plans for staging of oil spill response assets;
( i ) A description of your efforts to minimize impacts of your exploratory drilling operations on local community infrastructure, including but not limited to housing, energy supplies, and services; and
( j ) A description of whether and to what extent your project will rely on local community workforce and spill cleanup response capacity.
[81 FR 46565, July 15, 2016]
# C_2023120EN.01000501.xml

| 3.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/5

---

Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

(2023/C 120/05)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr. Ghazwan Rifat Kheir BEK (a.k.a. Ghazqan Kheir Bek) (No 12), Mr. Mohammad Walid GHAZAL (No 74), Mr. Mohammad Ibrahim AL-SHA'AR (No 107), Mr. Adib Mayaleh (No 53), Dr. Adnan SLAKHO (No 120), Dr. Saleh AL-RASHED (No 121), Mr. Khaled AL-ZUBAIDI (No 271), Mr. Ahmed KHALIL KHALIL (a.k.a. Ahmed KHALIL, Ahmad Khalil Khalil) (No 324), Mr. Nasser Deeb DEEB (a.k.a. Nasser Dhib, Nasser Dib, Nasser Deeb) (No 325), persons appearing in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1) and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.

The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons with amended statements of reasons and/or additional evidence. Those persons and entities are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain to obtain the elements the Council holds in its file regarding their designation, by 10 April 2023, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The persons concerned may submit at any time a request to the Council, together with any supporting documentation, that the decision to maintain them on the list should be reconsidered, to the address or e-mail address provided above. Such requests will be considered when they are received.

---

(1)  OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.

(2)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

---
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-31T11:25:18-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
AFS-11-350-E July 14, 2011 Exemption No. 8593C Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-12993

Ms. Kathleen A. Yodice

Counsel Stallion 51 Corporation 411 Aviation Way, Suite 245 Frederick, MD 21701

Dear Ms. Yodice:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8593, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated June 10, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Stallion 51 Corporation (Stallion 51) , for an extension of Exemption No. 8593, as amended. That exemption from § 91.315 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Stallion 51 to provide initial and recurrent training and training under contract with the U.S. military in its two North American TF-51 (TF-51) airplanes certificated as limited category civil aircraft.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Stallion 51.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8593, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and

limitations below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Stallion 51 must continue to maintain its TF-51 aircraft in an airworthy condition in

accordance with—

a. The maintenance requirements specified in the TF-51 aircraft type specification sheet, as amended;

b. An inspection program that meets the requirements of § 91.409; and

c. Appropriate military technical manuals for the TF-51 aircraft.

2. The pilot in command (PIC) must—

a. Hold at least a commercial pilot certificate with a single-engine land airplane rating;

b. Hold at least a second-class medical certificate;

c. Hold a certificated flight instructor certificate with an airplane single-engine rating;

d. Have completed TF-51 aircraft qualification and recurrent flight and ground training within the previous 12 calendar months; and3

e. Have accomplished three takeoffs and three landings to a full stop in a TF-51 aircraft within the previous 90 days before serving as PIC.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8593, as amended, to July 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

David C. Gillion Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****National gang report.**
 
2013 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:J 1.14/37:
Item Number:0721-A-20 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001052199
 
April 6, 2018