alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §50911. Space advertising

(a) Licensing.—Notwithstanding the provisions of this chapter or any other provision of law, the Secretary may not, for the launch of a payload containing any material to be used for the purposes of obtrusive space advertising—

(1) issue or transfer a license under this chapter; or

(2) waive the license requirements of this chapter.

(b) Launching.—No holder of a license under this chapter may launch a payload containing any material to be used for purposes of obtrusive space advertising.

(c) Commercial Space Advertising.—Nothing in this section shall apply to nonobtrusive commercial space advertising, including advertising on—

(1) commercial space transportation vehicles;

(2) space infrastructure payloads;

(3) space launch facilities; and

(4) launch support facilities.

(Added Pub. L. 106–391, title III, §322(b), Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1598, §70109a of title 49; renumbered §70109a then §50911 of title 51, Pub. L. 111–314, §4(d)(2), (3)(K), Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3440, 3441.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–314 successively renumbered section 70109a of title 49 and section 70109a of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Negotiation With Foreign Launching Nations

Pub. L. 106–391, title III, §322(c), Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1598, provided that:

"(1) The President is requested to negotiate with foreign launching nations for the purpose of reaching one or more agreements that prohibit the use of outer space for obtrusive space advertising purposes.

"(2) It is the sense of the Congress that the President should take such action as is appropriate and feasible to enforce the terms of any agreement to prohibit the use of outer space for obtrusive space advertising purposes.

"(3) As used in this subsection, the term 'foreign launching nation' means a nation—

"(A) that launches, or procures the launching of, a payload into outer space; or

"(B) from the territory or facility of which a payload is launched into outer space."
# C_2023089EN.01000701.xml

| 10.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/7

---

Notice for the attention of one entity subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran

(2023/C 89/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of Fajr Aviation Composite Industries (no. 12), an entity appearing in Annex II, Part I, to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (1) and in Annex IX, Part I, to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures against Iran.

The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned entity with new statement of reasons. The entity concerned is hereby informed that it may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statement of reasons for its designation, by 17 March 2023, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, p. 1.

---
# C_2023344EN.01011501.xml

| 29.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/115 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/115

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11149 – ASAHI KASEI / MITSUI CHEMICALS / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 344/04)

On 22 September 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11149. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11149. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### WILSON, Respondent, v. WILLIAMS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 20, 1903.)

Action by William C. Wilson against Charles H. Williams and another. C. P. Howland, for appellants. H. Wallis, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. MORRIS v. PARTRIDGE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people, on the relation of Thomas F. Morris, against John N. Partridge, as commissioner, etc.

T. McIlvaine, for relator.

T. Farley, for respondent.

No opinion. Writ dismissed, and proceedings affirmed, with costs.
### §30146. Collection and use of conference fees

(a) The Federal Election Commission may charge and collect fees for attending or otherwise participating in a conference sponsored by the Commission, and notwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, any amounts received from such fees during a fiscal year shall be credited to and merged with the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to the Commission during the year, and shall be available for use during the year for the costs of sponsoring such conferences.

(b) This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2007 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 109–289, div. B, title II, §21078, as added Pub. L. 110–5, §2, Feb. 15, 2007, 121 Stat. 59.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 457 of Title 2, The Congress, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section was enacted as part of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, and not as part of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which comprises this chapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1712-10 Underground sanitary facilities; maintenance.

Sanitary toilets shall be regularly maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Holding tanks shall be serviced and cleaned when full and in no case less than once each week by draining or pumping or by removing them to the surface for cleaning or recharging. Transfer tanks and transfer equipment used underground shall be equipped with suitable fittings to permit complete drainage of holding tanks without spillage and allow for the sanitary transportation of wastes to the surface. Waste shall be disposed of on the surface in accordance with State and local laws and regulations.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Moser, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to compel the court stenographer to prepare and file on or before December 31, 1960, pursuant to statute (Code Grim. Pro., § 456), a typewritten transcript of the minute of the trial, or in the alternative, to direct that appellant be released on reasonable bail or that the judgment of conviction be reversed and a new trial granted. Motion denied, without prejudice to renewal in the event that the typewritten transcript be not made available to appellant by January 5, 1961. Cross motion by the District Attorney to place this appeal on the calendar for the February Term, commencing January 30, 1961, granted; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 1605.24 Jurisdiction. ( a ) The district appeal board shall have jurisdiction to review and to affirm or change any local board decision appealed to it when: ( 1 ) An appeal is submitted by a registrant from a local board in its area; or
( 2 ) An appeal is submitted to it from a local board not in the appeal board area by a registrant whose principal place of employment or residence is located within the jurisdiction of the appeal board; or
( 3 ) An appeal is submitted or transferred to it by the Director of Selective Service to assure the fair and equitable administration of the Law.
( b ) The district appeal board shall have jurisdiction to review and to affirm or change any Alternative Service Office Manager decision appealed to it by an Alternative Service Worker pursuant to part 1656 of this chapter.
[47 FR 4644, Feb. 1, 1982, as amended at 69 FR 20543, Apr. 16, 2004]
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of - )

)

United Telephone Company of the 

Northwest, Lumen Technologies 

Government Solutions, Inc. (fka 

 Qwest Government Services, Inc. dba 

CenturyLink QGS), and Qwest 

Corporation

)

)

)

)

)

)

ASBCA Nos. 63370, 63371, 63372

63373, 63374, 63375

)

Under Contract No. N00406-15-F-0012 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Shelly Ewald, Esq.

 Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, L.L.P.

 McLean, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Trevor Davies, Esq.

Alan M. Mygatt-Tauber, Esq.

Devin A. Wolak, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 11, 2023

LAURA J. ARNETT

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63370, 63371, 63372, 63373, 

63374, 63375, Appeals of United Telephone Company of the Northwest, Lumen 

Technologies Government Solutions, Inc. (fka Qwest Government Services, Inc. dba 

CenturyLink QGS), and Qwest Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board’s 

Charter.

Dated: October 11, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
§ 7.9 Revocation. ( a ) MSHA may revoke for cause an approval issued under this part if the product: ( 1 ) Fails to meet the applicable technical requirements; or
( 2 ) Creates a hazard when used in a mine.
( b ) Prior to revoking an approval, the approval-holder shall be informed in writing of MSHA's intention to revoke approval. The notice shall: ( 1 ) Explain the specific reasons for the proposed revocation; and
( 2 ) Provide the approval-holder an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance with the product approval requirements.
( c ) Upon request, the approval-holder shall be afforded an opportunity for a hearing.
( d ) If a product poses an imminent hazard to the safety or health of miners, the approval may be immediately suspended without a written notice of the agency's intention to revoke. The suspension may continue until the revocation proceedings are completed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.1438 End attachment replacement.

Wire rope attachments shall be replaced when cracked, deformed, or excessively worn.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors 

FNB Corp. 

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-72686 and 333-54702) on Form S-8 of FNB Corp. of our report dated March 7, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of FNB Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002annual report on Form 10-K of FNB Corp. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

March 28, 2003 

Greenville, South Carolina
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComplex Permittivities of Candidate Radome Materials at W-bandThis report presents the results of w-band complex permittivity measurements performed in NASA Langley's Electromagnetics Research Branch. The test articles included in the permittivity study were flat panels of materials which are under consideration for use in a radome for the Passive Millimeter Wave Camera (PMMWC) flight experiment. This experiment is scheduled to fly on the Air Force's 'Speckled Trout' aircraft in late 1997. The radome design is very important because the PMMWC can tolerate only a small amount of electromagnetic loss through the radome. A free space measurement system was used to obtain complex reflection and transmission coefficients of the samples. The frequency of interest was 89 GHz, so measurements were performed over a range of 79 to 99 GHz. The transmission and reflection coefficients were used, along with the measured sample thickness, to calculate complex permittivity over the frequency range. The material samples measured in this study can be divided into four categories: skin materials, core materials, coating materials, and layered samples.Document ID19970027550Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCravey, Robin*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1997Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110344NASA-TM-110344Accession Number97N26480Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-24-21-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970027550.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §311103. Designation of Preserve America Communities

(a) Application.—To be considered for designation as a Preserve America Community, a community, tribal area, or neighborhood shall submit to the Council an application containing such information as the Council may require.

(b) Criteria.—To be designated as a Preserve America Community under the program, a community, tribal area, or neighborhood that submits an application under subsection (a) shall, as determined by the Chairman of the Council, in consultation with the Secretary, meet criteria required by the Chairman of the Council and, in addition, consider—

(1) protection and celebration of the heritage of the community, tribal area, or neighborhood;

(2) use of the historic assets of the community, tribal area, or neighborhood for economic development and community revitalization; and

(3) encouragement of people to experience and appreciate local historic resources through education and heritage tourism programs.

(c) Local Governments Previously Certified for Historic Preservation Activities.—The Council shall establish an expedited process for Preserve America Community designation for local governments previously certified for historic preservation activities under section 302502 of this title.

(d) Guidelines.—The Chairman of the Council, in consultation with the Secretary, shall establish any guidelines that are necessary to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3248; Pub. L. 114–289, title V, §501(d), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1490.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 311103 | 16 U.S.C. 469n(d). | Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, subtitle D, §7302(d), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1215. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–289 substituted "Chairman of the Council" for "Council" in two places in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–289 substituted "Chairman of the Council" for "Council".
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                               STM WIRELESS, INC.

COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
                    (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             1996              1995           1994
                                                             ----              ----           ----
<S>                                                        <C>              <C>             <C>      
Primary (loss) income per share of common stock:

Weighted average shares of common stock
       outstanding during period                           5,849,160        5,720,299       5,271,940
Incremental shares assumed to be outstanding (1)                  --          326,438         255,537
                                                          ----------        ---------       ---------

Weighted average shares of common and common
 stock equivalents outstanding                             5,849,160        6,046,737       5,527,477
                                                          ----------        ---------       ---------

Net (loss) income                                             (4,816)           1,722           1,562
                                                          ----------        ---------       ---------

(Loss) income per  share of common
       and common stock equivalents                       $    (0.82)       $    0.28       $    0.28
                                                          ----------        ---------       ---------

Fully diluted (loss) income per share:

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
       during  period                                      5,849,160        5,720,299       5,271,940
Incremental shares assumed to be outstanding (1)                  --          326,438         255,537
                                                          ----------        ---------       ---------

Weighted average shares of common and common
       stock equivalents outstanding                       5,849,160        6,046,737       5,527,477
                                                          ----------        ---------       ---------

Net (loss) income                                             (4,816)           1,722           1,562
                                                          ----------        ---------       ---------

(Loss) income per share of common and common
       stock equivalents                                  $    (0.82)       $    0.28       $    0.28
                                                          ----------        ---------       ---------
</TABLE>


(1)      Incremental shares are anti-dilutive in 1996 and are therefore excluded
         from the determination of weighted average common and common stock 
         equivalents outstanding.


                                       61
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. H. Glyn Sees, Jr., Appellant.

Motion granted and appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, entered September 27, 1961, dismissed on the ground that the order is not appealable.
#### § 937.762 Criteria for designating areas as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.

Part 762 of this chapter, *Criteria for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* shall apply to surface coal mine operations beginning one year after May 28, 1982.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Bernard Golding, Deceased. Morris Golding, Respondent; Howard Bayer, Appellant.

Order, entered on or about June 3, 1960, as grants respondent’s motion for a reargument of his motion to vacate in its entirety petitioner’s demand for a bill of particulars dated February 16, 1960, and upon such reargument adhering to its original decision denying respondent’s motion to vacate certain items contained in petitioner’s demand for a bill of particulars, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion to vacate petitioner-respondent’s demand for a bill of particulars in its entirety is granted, with $10 costs. The examination before trial of respondent-appellant, directing examination on “All the relevant and material allegations of fact put in issue by the pleadings herein ”, permits an appropriate and exhaustive inquiry into the entire subject matter *459of the numerous items contained in the demand for a bill of particulars. Furthermore, the answer does not assert affirmative defenses and petitioner, in its lengthy demand, seeks evidentiary amplification of the allegations of his own petition. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1







                              Accountants' Consent


The Board of Directors
ImClone Systems Incorporated

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement Nos. 33-95860, 333-07339, 333-21417, 333-39067 and 333-67335 on Form
S-3 and Nos. 333-10275, 33-95894, 333-64825, 333-64827 and 333-30172 on Form
S-8 of ImClone Systems Incorporated of our report dated March 3, 2000, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of ImClone Systems Incorporated and
subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in
the December 31, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K of ImClone Systems
Incorporated.


                                           /s/ KPMG LLP
                                           ------------------------------------
                                               KPMG LLP



Princeton, New Jersey
March 29, 2000