alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9421 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.9421

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 108 North Main Street in Bucoda, Washington, as the ``Mayor Rob Gordon 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MAYOR ROB GORDON POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 108 North Main Street in Bucoda, Washington, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Mayor Rob Gordon Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mayor Rob 
Gordon Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# Welcome to the Health Insurance Marketplace®

Apply for coverage

Get Marketplace basicsLog in to make changesBrowse plans & costsFind local help
Get small business coverage info

## Lost Medicaid or CHIP? Get Marketplace coverage

Learn more

Check if you can enroll now
Find out when you can enroll or change plans.

Discover how to submit documents
Get tips to confirm info on your application.

Learn how to report changes
Know which changes to report and how to report them.

Take advantage of your Marketplace plan benefits

Find what all Marketplace plans cover, like preventive services, essential health benefits, and more.

Get key dates

Mark these important dates and deadlines on your calendar.

Recent court decisions about nondiscrimination

Find information on recent court decisions about nondiscrimination in health programs.

## Get important news & updates

Sign up for email and text updates to get deadline reminders and other important information.

Privacy Policy

## HealthCare.gov blog

            - September 5 Stay connected: It's easy with 3 simple ways
            - August 22 Mark your calendar with key Open Enrollment dates
Browse blogs
#### § 941.764 Process for designating areas unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.

Part 764 of this chapter, *State Processes for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* pertaining to petitioning, initial processing, hearing requirements, decisions, data base and inventory systems, public information, and regulatory responsibilities shall apply to surface coal mine operations beginning one year after the effective date of this program.
# C_2023251EN.01000301.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/3

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11176 – LONE STAR / CENTROMOTION)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 251/03)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | LSF12 Badger Bidco, LLC, (‘LSAF12’, USA) controlled by Lone Star Funds (‘Lone Star’, USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

LSF12 Badger Bidco, LLC, (‘LSAF12’, USA) controlled by Lone Star Funds (‘Lone Star’, USA),

| — | BRWS Parent LLC (‘BRWS’, USA), the holding company sitting on top of the CentroMotion group, |
| --- | --- |

—

BRWS Parent LLC (‘BRWS’, USA), the holding company sitting on top of the CentroMotion group,

Lone Star will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control over BRWS.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | LSAF12 is a wholly owned subsidiary of affiliates of Lone Star Funds, a private equity firm that invests globally in real estate, equity, credit, and other financial assets. |
| --- | --- |

—

LSAF12 is a wholly owned subsidiary of affiliates of Lone Star Funds, a private equity firm that invests globally in real estate, equity, credit, and other financial assets.

| — | BRWS is the holding company of the CentroMotion group which designs and manufactures highly engineered systems and solutions that enhance the safety, reliability and productivity of its customers’ equipment for the industrial and transportation end. |
| --- | --- |

—

BRWS is the holding company of the CentroMotion group which designs and manufactures highly engineered systems and solutions that enhance the safety, reliability and productivity of its customers’ equipment for the industrial and transportation end.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11176 – LONE STAR / CENTROMOTION

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
#### Mary Kielb, as Administratrix of the Estate of Raymond F. Kielb, Deceased, Appellant, v. Anne V. Boigeol, as Executrix of Edgar N. Mather., Deceased, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, without posts of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from judgment of Oswego Trial *725Term for defendant for no cause of action, in an automobile negligence action. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.) Present—Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
*After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R.

34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This

order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be

cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 27 2003

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARIO JON GALE, also known as

Jose Manuel Rodriguez,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 02-1288

(D.C. No. 02-CR-15-D)

(D. Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before EBEL, HENRY and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

Mario Jon Gale pled guilty to one count of unlawful reentry into the United

States after having previously been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

and (b)(2). The district court sentenced him to 70 months’ imprisonment, the

minimum sentence within the applicable range under the United States Sentencing
- 2 -

Guidelines. Mr. Gale now appeals the district court’s refusal to grant him a

downward departure for cultural assimilation. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and AFFIRM.

On appeal, Mr. Gale’s counsel filed an Anders brief and moved to withdraw

as appellate counsel. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). In the

Anders brief, counsel argues that Mr. Gale’s sentence was not imposed contrary

to the law, as a result of an incorrect application of the Sentencing Guidelines, or

in excess of the applicable Guideline range, and that Mr. Gale’s appeal is

therefore wholly without merit. We have fully examined the proceedings as

required by Anders and concluded that Mr. Gale’s appeal is indeed without merit. 

Moreover, we lack jurisdiction to review a district court’s failure to depart

downward in sentencing absent a claim that the court misunderstood its authority

to depart. United States v. Coddington, 118 F.3d 1439, 1441 (10th Cir. 1997). 

We find no such misunderstanding on the part of the district court in this case. 

For the foregoing reasons, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and

Gale’s conviction is AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

David M. Ebel

Circuit Judge
### §200307. Availability of Fund amounts for publicity purposes

(a) In General.—Amounts derived from the sources listed in section 200302 of this title shall not be available for publicity purposes.

(b) Exception for Temporary Signing.—In a case where significant acquisition or development is initiated, appropriate standardized temporary signing shall be located on or near the affected site, to the extent feasible, so as to indicate the action taken is a product of funding made available through the Fund. The signing may indicate the percentage amounts and dollar amounts financed by Federal and non-Federal funds, and that the source of the funding includes amounts derived from Outer Continental Shelf receipts. The Secretary shall prescribe standards and guidelines for the usage of the signing to ensure consistency of design and application.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3179.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 200307 | 16 U.S.C. 460l–10. | Pub. L. 88–578, title I, §8, formerly §7, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 903; renumbered §8, Pub. L. 92–347, §2, July 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 459; Pub. L. 94–422, title I, §101(5), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1318. |

Section
### §2659. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–113, div. M, title VII, §701(f), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2930

Section, Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4508, formerly Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXI, §3153, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 940; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLV, §4508, and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(h)(9), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1774; Pub. L. 112–239, div. C, title XXXI, §3131(o)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2183, related to report on security vulnerabilities of national security laboratory computers.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We have issued our report dated June 28, 2018, with respect to the financial statements and supplemental schedule included in the Annual Report of the GCI 401(k) Plan on Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of GCI Liberty, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-223667).





/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP





Seattle, Washington


June 28, 2018
### §60303. Pilot projects to encourage public sector applications

(a) In General.—The Administrator shall establish a program of grants for competitively awarded pilot projects to explore the integrated use of sources of remote sensing and other geospatial information to address State, local, regional, and tribal agency needs.

(b) Preferred Projects.—In awarding grants under this section, the Administrator shall give preference to projects that—

(1) make use of commercial data sets, including high resolution commercial satellite imagery and derived satellite data products, existing public data sets where commercial data sets are not available or applicable, or the fusion of such data sets;

(2) integrate multiple sources of geospatial information, such as geographic information system data, satellite-provided positioning data, and remotely sensed data, in innovative ways;

(3) include funds or in-kind contributions from non-Federal sources;

(4) involve the participation of commercial entities that process raw or lightly processed data, often merging that data with other geospatial information, to create data products that have significant value added to the original data; and

(5) taken together demonstrate as diverse a set of public sector applications as possible.

(c) Opportunities.—In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall seek opportunities to assist—

(1) in the development of commercial applications potentially available from the remote sensing industry; and

(2) State, local, regional, and tribal agencies in applying remote sensing and other geospatial information technologies for growth management.

(d) Duration.—Assistance for a pilot project under subsection (a) shall be provided for a period not to exceed 3 years.

(e) Report.—Each recipient of a grant under subsection (a) shall transmit a report to the Administrator on the results of the pilot project within 180 days of the completion of that project.

(f) Workshop.—Each recipient of a grant under subsection (a) shall, not later than 180 days after the completion of the pilot project, conduct at least one workshop for potential users to disseminate the lessons learned from the pilot project as widely as feasible.

(g) Regulations.—The Administrator shall issue regulations establishing application, selection, and implementation procedures for pilot projects, and guidelines for reports and workshops required by this section.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3423.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60303 | 42 U.S.C. 16673. | Pub. L. 109–155, title III, §313, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2921. |

Section
#### § 933.827 Special performance standards—coal processing plants and support facilities not located at or near the minesite or not within the permit area for a mine.

Part 827 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Coal Processing Plants and Support Facilities Not Located at or Near the Minesite or Not Within the Permit Area for a Mine,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations which include the operation of coal processing plants and support facilities not located at or near the minesite or not within the permit area for a mine.
#### § 586.110 When must I notify BOEM of mergers, name changes, or changes of business form?

You must notify BOEM in writing of any merger, name change, or change of business form. You must notify BOEM as soon as practicable following the merger, name change, or change in business form, but no later than 120 days after the earliest of either the effective date, or the date of filing the change or action with the Secretary of the State or other authorized official in the State of original registry.
### **CHAPTER 1013—EMPLOYEES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
101301.
Maintenance management system.
101302.
Authority of Secretary to carry out certain activities.
101303.
Medical attention for employees.
101304.
Personal equipment and property.
101305.
Travel expenses of System employees and dependents of deceased employees.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—SERVICE CAREER DEVELOPMENT, TRAINING, AND MANAGEMENT

101321.
Service employee training.
101322.
Management development and training.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—HOUSING IMPROVEMENT

101331.
Definitions.
101332.
General authority of Secretary.
101333.
Criteria for providing housing.
101334.
Authorization for housing agreements.
101335.
Housing programs.
101336.
Contracts for the management of field employee quarters.
101337.
Leasing of seasonal employee quarters.
101338.
General leasing provisions.
101339.
Assessment and priority listing.
101340.
Use of funds.
Exhibit 10.13(e)


Exhibit
  10.12(e)

	SECOND
      AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
	 	 	 	 	 
	This Second
      Amendment to Employment Agreemet is made and entered into as of November
      19, 2002, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (“Employer”)
      and Allan C. Youngberg (“Executive”).
	 	 	 	 	 
	Recitals	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	A)	 	On July
      23, 1999, an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between
      Employer and Executive.
	B)	 	On September
      26, 2001, a First Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and entered
      into by and between Employer and Executive.
	C)	 	Pursuant
      to a Memorandum dated October 16, 2001, Executive’s Annual Base Salary
      was increased to $210,000, effective as of September 1, 2001.
	D)	 	Employer
      and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set
      forth herein below:
	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreement	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	1)	 	Section
      3.1 of the Employment Agreement, which currently provides: 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 3.1	 	Term.
      The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on August
      13, 1999 and shall continue until August 12, 2002, unless sooner terminated
      or extended as hereinafter provided (the “Employment Term”).
    
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	is hereby
      amended to provide as follows:
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	3.1	 	Term.
      The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on August
      13, 1999 and shall continue until August 12, 2003 unless sooner terminated
      or extended as hereinafter provided (the “Employment Term”).
	 	 	 	 	 
	2)	 	All other
      terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and
      fully effective.
	 	 	 	 	 


	Executed
      in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.
	 	 
	EXECUTIVE	EMPLOYER
	 	 
	 	PRICESMART, INC.
	/s/ALLAN
      C. YOUNGBERG	By: /s/GIL PARTIDA

      Name: Gil Parida

      Its: President
#### Wilcox, Gibbs *&*Company *vs.*Aultman.

When the maker of a negotiable draft or note pays it to one who has not the possession of the paper at the time of such payment so as to enable him to take it up, but, instead thereof, takes a receipt for the money so paid, such receipt will not protect him *from the*pay ment of the draft or note when sued by the *bona fide*holder thereof before due.

Promissory notes. Contracts. Before Judge Simmons-Crawford Superior Court. March Term, 1879.

Reported in the decision.

W. E. Collier, by brief, for plaintiffs in error.

R. I). Smith; M.' *D.*Stroud; J. C. Rutherford, for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

This was an action brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant on a draft drawn by him upon Messrs. Adams & Bazemore, payable to his own order, and indorsed by himself, for the sum of $88.70, dated 20th January, 1870, and due on the 6th day of November thereafter, with a crop lien annexed thereto, The defendant pleaded pay*545raent. On the trial of the case the jury, under the charge of the court, found a verdict in favor of the defendant. A motion was made for a new trial on the grounds therein stated, which was overruled, and the plaintiffs excepted.

It appears from the evidence in the record, that the plaintiffs became the *bona, fide*holders of the draft before its maturity for a valuable consideration, to-wit: in the month of August, 1870, receiving the same from Loyd *&*Sons. The defendant testified that the draft was given by him for one ton of Frank Coe’s guano, purchased by him from Bateman, who was the agent of Loyd & Sons, that in the fall of the year 1870 he paid the draft to Loyd *&*Sons ; who told him that they did not have it, but would get it and send it to him in three days, and gave defendant a receipt in full payment of the draft. The defendant proved the payment of the money to Loyd *&*Sons, and the taking of their receipt therefor by another witness, so that the question is, whether the payment of the money by the defendant to Loyd & Sons, who did not have the draft at the time, was a good payment in law as against the plaintiffs, who, as the evidence shows, were then the *bona fide*holders of the draft. When the maker of a negotiable draft or note pays it to one who has not the possession of the paper at the time of such payment, so as to enable him to take it up, but takes a receipt for the money so paid instead of taking up his draft or note, such receipt will not protect him from the payment of the draft or note when sued by the *bona fide*holder thereof before due. 54 *Ga.,*52. In view of the evidence in the record, the verdict of the jury was contrary to law, and it was error in not granting a new trial upon that ground. *'•*

Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.
#### § 77.1909 Explosives and blasting; use of permissible explosives and shot-firing units.

Except as provided in § 77.1909-1, only permissible explosives and permissible shot-firing units shall be used in sinking shafts and slopes.
# C_2023344EN.01022401.xml

| 29.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/224 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/224

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2023/C 344/15)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 22.8.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 22.8.2023 - 31.12.2023 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or Group of stocks | BFT/AE45WM (including special conditions BFT/*641, BFT/*643, BFT/*8301, BFT/*8302, BFT/*8303F) |
| Species | Bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) |
| Zone | Atlantic Ocean, east of 45° W, and Mediterranean |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 10/TQ194 |

Date and time of closure

22.8.2023

Duration

22.8.2023 - 31.12.2023

Member State

Portugal

Stock or Group of stocks

BFT/AE45WM (including special conditions BFT/*641, BFT/*643, BFT/*8301, BFT/*8302, BFT/*8303F)

Species

Bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus)

Thunnus thynnus

Zone

Atlantic Ocean, east of 45° W, and Mediterranean

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

10/TQ194

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 922.823 Special performance standards—operations on prime farmland.

Part 823 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Operations on Prime Farmland,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations on prime farmlands.