alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2020-N-1866]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice entitled “Wockhardt Ltd., et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of Nine Abbreviated New Drug Applications” that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 9, 2020. The document announced the withdrawal of approval (as of November 9, 2020) of nine abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) from multiple applicants. The document indicated that FDA was withdrawing approval of the following ANDA after receiving a withdrawal request from VistaPharm, Inc., 7265 Ulmerton Rd., Largo, FL 33771: ANDA 077788, Albuterol Sulfate Syrup, Equivalent to 2 milligrams base/5 milliliters. Before FDA withdrew the approval of this ANDA, VistaPharm, Inc., informed FDA that it did not want the approval of the ANDA withdrawn. Because VistaPharm, Inc., timely requested that approval of this ANDA not be withdrawn, the approval of ANDA 077788 is still in effect.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Martha Nguyen, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1676, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-6980,                         *Martha.Nguyen@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 9, 2020 (85 FR 64150), in FR Doc. 2020-22403, the following correction is made:                

On page 64150, in the table, the entry for ANDA 077788 is removed.

Dated: December 16, 2020.

Lauren K. Roth,

Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-28081 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 15







Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated April 13, 2000 on our review of the interim
financial information of Dexter Corporation (the "Company") as of and for the
periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, and included in the Company's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 is incorporated by
reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-8, Registration Nos.
2-63959, 33-27597, 33-53307, 33-53309, 333-02985, 333-04081, 333-42663
and 333-76873.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

May 5, 2000
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

h0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

144555

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144555

COA: 305397

Otsego CC: 07

- 003810

- FC

TROY WILLIAM CARPENTER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2011

order of the Court of Ap peals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2012 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





Date: December 1, 2015








/s/F. Stephen Ward


F. Stephen Ward


Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 843.1 Scope.

This part sets forth general rules regarding enforcement by the Office of the Act, this chapter, any Federal program, the Federal lands program, State programs being enforced by the Office in whole or in part under section 504(b) or 521(b) of the Act and part 733 of this chapter and (in limited circumstances) under § 842.11 or § 842.12 of this chapter, and all conditions of permits and coal exploration approvals or permits imposed under any of these programs, the Act, or this chapter.
### §4236. Individual compensation of eligible Aleuts

#### (a) Payments to eligible Aleuts

In addition to payments made under section 4235 of this title, the Secretary shall, in accordance with this section, make per capita payments out of the Fund to eligible Aleuts. The Secretary shall pay, subject to the availability of funds appropriated to the Fund for such payments, to each eligible Aleut the sum of $12,000.

#### (b) Assistance of Attorney General

The Secretary may request the Attorney General to provide reasonable assistance in locating eligible Aleuts residing outside the affected Aleut villages, and upon such request, the Attorney General shall provide such assistance. In so doing, the Attorney General may use available facilities and resources of the International Committee of the Red Cross and other organizations.

#### (c) Assistance of Administrator

The Secretary may request the assistance of the Administrator in identifying and locating eligible Aleuts for purposes of this section.

#### (d) Clarification of treatment of payments under other laws

Amounts paid to an eligible Aleut under this section—

(1) shall be treated for purposes of the internal revenue laws of the United States as damages for human suffering, and

(2) shall not be included as income or resources for purposes of determining eligibility to receive benefits described in section 3803(c)(2)(C) of title 31 or the amount of such benefits.

#### (e) Payment in full settlement of claims against United States

The payment to an eligible Aleut under this section shall be in full satisfaction of all claims against the United States arising out of the relocation described in section 4232(5) of this title.

#### (f) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Fund such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 100–383, title II, §206, Aug. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 914.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1989c–5 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### The thrust belt in Southwest Montana and east-central Idaho

By: Edward T. RuppelDavid A. Lopez

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1278

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### F. E. HARRISON, Appellant v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al.

No. 11194.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 4, 1954.

April 6, 1954.

Harry Norman Ball, Philadelphia, Pa. (Morris L. Weisberg, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Earl G. Harrison, Louis J. Goffman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Wm. A. Schnader, Ar-lin M. Adams, Philadelphia, Pa., Schnadcr, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., Morris Wolf, Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., Mitchell E. Panzer, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this private suit under the antitrust laws the plaintiff who is the owner but not the operator of a motion picture theatre al!e»ed a conspiracy by the defendants unreasonably to restrain trade by denying first run pictures to her theatre. The case was tried to a jury which rendered a verdict for the defendants upon which judgment was entered. A motion by the plaintiff for ***judgment n. o. v. or a new trial was denied and the present appeal followed,

Upon thig appea] the plaintiff urges that she is entitled to judgment n. o. v., in the 1¡gM of the decree of the District Court for the Southern District of New York in United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 66 F.Supp. 323; Id.,70 F.Supp. 323; Id.,70 F.Supp. 53 affirmed in part and reverged in part 334 U.S. 131, 68 S.Ct. 915, 92 L.Ed. 1260, final decree 85 F.Supp. 881, affirmed Loew’s, Inc., v. United States, 339 U.S. 974, 70 S.Ct. 1031, 94 L.Ed. 1380, because no issue was created which could be submitted to the jury on the impact upon the facts of her case of the conspiracy found to exist in the Paramount case and because she was a per-gon injured, and therefore entitled to sue, under the Clayton Act even though she was a non-operating theatre owner. She also urges that she is in any event ent^ed a. new because of the adegcd coercion of a juror by the trial judge and because of errors in the charge of the trial judge to the jury.

All of the foregoing contentions were presented to the district court on the motion for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial. *406They were all fully eonsidéred and correctly decided against the plaintiff in an able and comprehensive opinion filed by Chief Judge Kirkpatrick, 115 F.Supp. 312. We find ourselves in complete accord with his reasoning and conclusions and need add nothing thereto.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Hoffman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL J. HOFFMAN                                  
|Michael J. Hoffman President and Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2007
### **CHAPTER 103—DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

Sec.
10301.
Notice of employment opportunities for Department of State and USAID positions.
10302.
Consulting services for the Department of State.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–81, div. E, title LIII, §5314(b), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2366, which directed the addition of item 10302 to this analysis, as added by section "10312(b)" of Pub. L. 117–81, was not executed to reflect the probable intent of Congress, as identical item 10302 already appeared in this analysis, as added by section 5312(b) of Pub. L. 117–81.
### §306102. Preservation program

(a) Establishment.—Each Federal agency shall establish (except for programs or undertakings exempted pursuant to section 304108(c) of this title), in consultation with the Secretary, a preservation program for the identification, evaluation, and nomination to the National Register, and protection, of historic property.

(b) Requirements.—The program shall ensure that—

(1) historic property under the jurisdiction or control of the agency is identified, evaluated, and nominated to the National Register;

(2) historic property under the jurisdiction or control of the agency is managed and maintained in a way that considers the preservation of their historic, archeological, architectural, and cultural values in compliance with section 306108 of this title and gives special consideration to the preservation of those values in the case of property designated as having national significance;

(3) the preservation of property not under the jurisdiction or control of the agency but potentially affected by agency actions is given full consideration in planning;

(4) the agency's preservation-related activities are carried out in consultation with other Federal, State, and local agencies, Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations carrying out historic preservation planning activities, and the private sector; and

(5) the agency's procedures for compliance with section 306108 of this title—

(A) are consistent with regulations promulgated by the Council pursuant to section 304108(a) and (b) of this title;

(B) provide a process for the identification and evaluation of historic property for listing on the National Register and the development and implementation of agreements, in consultation with State Historic Preservation Officers, local governments, Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, and the interested public, as appropriate, regarding the means by which adverse effects on historic property will be considered; and

(C) provide for the disposition of Native American cultural items from Federal or tribal land in a manner consistent with section 3(c) of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3002(c)).

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3225.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 306102 | 16 U.S.C. 470h–2(a)(2). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §110(a)(2), as added Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §206, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2996; Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4012(2), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4760. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "except for programs and undertakings exempted" are substituted for "unless exempted" for clarity.

In subsection (b)(2), the words "as are listed in or may be eligible for the National Register" are omitted as unnecessary because of the definition of "historic property" in section 300308 of the new title.
### §40906. Equal access to the Administration's education programs

(a) In General.—The Administrator shall strive to ensure equal access for minority and economically disadvantaged students to the Administration's education programs.

(b) Report.—Every 2 years, the Administrator shall submit a report to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate describing the efforts by the Administrator to ensure equal access for minority and economically disadvantaged students under this section and the results of such efforts. As part of the report, the Administrator shall provide—

(1) data on minority participation in the Administration's education programs, at a minimum in the categories of—

(A) elementary and secondary education;

(B) undergraduate education; and

(C) graduate education; and

(2) the total value of grants the Administration made to Historically Black Colleges and Universities and to Hispanic Serving Institutions through education programs during the period covered by the report.

(c) Program.—The Administrator shall establish the Dr. Mae C. Jemison Grant Program to work with Minority Serving Institutions to bring more women of color into the field of space and aeronautics.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3393.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40906 | 42 U.S.C. 16794. | Pub. L. 109–155, title VI, §615, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2934. |

Section

In subsection (b), in the matter before paragraph (1), the words "Every 2 years" are substituted for "Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [December 30, 2005], and every 2 years thereafter" to eliminate obsolete language.

In subsection (b), in the matter before paragraph (1), the words "Committee on Science and Technology" are substituted for "Committee on Science" on authority of Rule X(1)(o) of the Rules of the House of Representatives, adopted by House Resolution No. 6 (110th Congress, January 5, 2007).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
### **CHAPTER 85—UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—EMPLOYEES GENERALLY

Sec.
8501.
Definitions.
8502.
Compensation under State agreement.
8503.
Compensation absent State agreement.
8504.
Assignment of Federal service and wages.
8505.
Payments to States.
8506.
Dissemination of information.
8507.
False statements and misrepresentations.
8508.
Regulations.
8509.
Federal Employees Compensation Account.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—EX-SERVICEMEN

8521.
Definitions; application.
8522.
Assignment of Federal service and wages.
8523.
Dissemination of information.
8524.
Repealed.
8525.
Effect on other statutes.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–378, §2(73), Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1355, added item 8509.

**1975**—Pub. L. 94–183, §2(42), Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1059, substituted "Repealed" for "Accrued leave" in item 8524.
### §308401. Definition of network 1

In this chapter, the term "Network" means the African American Civil Rights Network established under section 308402(a).

(Added Pub. L. 115–104, §3(a), Jan. 8, 2018, 131 Stat. 2260.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Purposes

Pub. L. 115–104, §2, Jan. 8, 2018, 131 Stat. 2260, provided that: "The purposes of this Act [enacting this chapter] are—

"(1) to recognize—

"(A) the importance of the African American civil rights movement; and

"(B) the sacrifices made by the people who fought against discrimination and segregation; and

"(2) to authorize the National Park Service to coordinate and facilitate Federal and non-Federal activities to commemorate, honor, and interpret—

"(A) the history of the African American civil rights movement;

"(B) the significance of the civil rights movement as a crucial element in the evolution of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000a et seq.); and

"(C) the relevance of the African American civil rights movement in fostering the spirit of social justice and national reconciliation."

1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized.
§ 150.10 Request for appellate defense counsel. An accused may be represented before the Court by appellate counsel detailed pursuant to Article 70(a) or by civilian counsel provided by the accused, or both. An accused who does not waive appellate review pursuant to Rule for Courts-Martial 1110 shall, within 10 days after service of a copy of the convening authority's action under Rule for Courts-Martial 1107(h), forward to the convening authority or the Judge Advocate General: ( a ) A request for representation by military appellate defense counsel, or
( b ) Notice that civilian counsel has been retained or that action has been taken to retain civilian counsel (must include name and address of civilian counsel), or
( c ) Both a request for representation by military appellate defense counsel under paragraph (a) for this section and notice regarding civilian counsel under paragraph (b) of this section, or
( d ) A waiver of representation by counsel.
#### § 884.11 State eligibility.

You, a State or Indian tribe, are eligible to submit a reclamation plan if you have eligible lands or water as defined in § 700.5 of this chapter within your jurisdiction. We may approve your proposed reclamation plan if you have an approved State regulatory program under section 503 of SMCRA, and you meet the other requirements of this chapter and SMCRA. The States of Tennessee and Missouri are exempt from the requirement for an approved State regulatory program by section 402(g)(8)(B) of SMCRA. The Navajo, Hopi, and Crow Indian tribes are exempt from the requirement for an approved regulatory program by section 405(k) of SMCRA.

[73 FR 67642, Nov. 14, 2008]