alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.326


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$197,056                      Glendale, California                 June 29, 2000


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Cindy Gosselin (Payor") promises to pay in lawful money
of the United States of America to Pollution Research and Control Corp., a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale, California, the sum of
$197,056.00 Dollars from the date hereof on the unpaid principal payable in
installments of principal only in the sum of $100.00 Dollars commencing on July
15, 2000 and payable on the same day of each month thereafter until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each installment under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately due and payable if such default is not cured within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned written notice of such default. The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's common stock, no par value (the
"Shares"), pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason, the unpaid balance of this note shall be cancelled, and the pro rata
portion of Shares which then not fully paid for, shall be returned to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                       Payor:



                                       /s/ Cindy  Gosselin
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       (Signature)
### §58. Repealed. Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1208, title III, §305(d), 68 Stat. 1114

Section, act July 17, 1912, ch. 236, 37 Stat. 193, related to awards. See section 4501 et seq. of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 90 days after Sept. 1, 1954, see section 307 of act Sept. 1, 1954.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                  EXHIBIT NO. 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Percentage Owned       State of Incorporation
                                   ----------------       ----------------------
<S>                                <C>                    <C>
Greene County Bank                       100%                    Tennessee

                                         100% of
Greene County Capital Trust I      Common Securities             Delaware
</TABLE>

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF GREENE COUNTY BANK

<TABLE>
<S>                                      <C>                     <C>
Superior Financial Services, Inc.        100%                    Tennessee

GCB Acceptance Corporation               100%                    Tennessee

Fairway Title Company                    100%                    Tennessee
</TABLE>

                                       1
#### Alfred Engel, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents. William B. Pressman et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 29, 1977, dismissing the complaints after a consolidated nonjury trial, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of striking the decretal paragraph dismissing the complaint and declaring the rights of the parties *(Lanza v Wagner,*11 NY2d 317, 334), and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The court, *sua sponte,*grants leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Plaintiffs in both actions were employees of the New York City civil service who had competed successfully in New York City civil service promotional examinations but complain, *inter alia,*that there was a violation of the "one-in-three rule” (Civil Service Law, §61, subd 1), and that provisionals were being retained in titles for which civil service employees had successfully competed, contrary to section 65 of the Civil Service Law. We agree with the reasoning of Trial Term that there was no violation of the "one-in-three rule” regarding plaintiff Engel. Furthermore, we note that the plaintiffs Pressman, Okin, and Gouvier were appointed based on the examination they took. We agree with Trial Term’s finding that the managerial plan of the City of New York, which allows for specific assignments within a grade to be left to the discretion of the department head, is neither novel nor violative of statute (cf. *Matter of Mandle v Brown,*5 NY2d 51). Our only modification of the judgment, therefore, is to declare that the exercise of the "one-in-three rule” as applied to Engel was not violative of law; that Engel is not entitled as of right to a higher salary for that position; that Engel is not entitled to judgment for damages; that Pressman, Okin, and Gouvier are not entitled as of right to be promoted to a position with the title "Administrative Engineer,” "Principal Budget Examiner,” or "Principle Methods Analyst”; and they are not granted judgment for damages. Settle order. Concur-Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Evans and Lane, JJ.
#### § 903.827 Special performance standards—Coal preparation plants not located within the permit area of a mine.

Part 827 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Coal Preparation Plants Not Located Within the Permit Area of a Mine,* applies to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations which include the operation of a coal preparation plant not located within the permit area of a mine.
#### § 56.4402 Safety can use.

Small quantities of flammable liquids drawn from storage shall be kept in safety cans labeled to indicate the contents.
§ 550.1475 When must I pay the penalty? ( a ) You must pay the amount of the Notice of Civil Penalty issued under § 550.1453 or § 550.1461, if you do not request a hearing on the record under § 550.1454, § 550.1456, § 550.1462, or § 550.1464
( b ) If you request a hearing on the record under § 550.1454, § 550.1456, § 550.1462, or § 550.1464, but you do not appeal the determination of the Administrative Law Judge to the Interior Board of Land Appeals under § 550.1473, you must pay the amount assessed by the Administrative Law Judge.
( c ) If you appeal the determination of the Administrative Law Judge to the Interior Board of Land Appeals, you must pay the amount assessed in the IBLA decision.
( d ) You must pay the penalty assessed within 40 days after: ( 1 ) You received the Notice of Civil Penalty, if you did not request a hearing on the record under either § 550.1454, § 550.1456, § 550.1462, or § 550.1464;
( 2 ) You received an Administrative Law Judge's decision under § 550.1472, if you obtained a stay of the accrual of penalties pending the hearing on the record under § 550.1455(b) or § 550.1463(b) and did not appeal the Administrative Law Judge's determination to the IBLA under § 550.1473;
( 3 ) You received an IBLA decision under § 550.1473 if the IBLA continued the stay of accrual of penalties pending its decision and you did not seek judicial review of the IBLA's decision; or
( 4 ) A final non-appealable judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction is entered, if you sought judicial review of the IBLA's decision and the Department or the appropriate court suspended compliance with the IBLA's decision pending the adjudication of the case.
( e ) If you do not pay, that amount is subject to collection under the provisions of § 550.1477.
§ 706.6 Penalties. ( a ) Criminal penalties are imposed by section 201(f) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95-87, which prohibits each employee of the Office or any other Federal employee who performs any function or duty under the Act from having a direct or indirect financial interest in underground or surface coal mining operations. The Act provides that whoever knowingly violates the provisions of section 201(f) shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $2,500, or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.
( b ) Regulatory penalties are imposed by this part. The provisions in section 201(f) of the Act make compliance with the financial interest requirements a condition of employment for all Office employees and for other Federal employees who perform any functions or duties under the Act. Accordingly, an employee who fails to file the required financial statement will be considered in violation of the intended employment provisions of section 201(f) and will be subject to removal from his or her position.
###### Editorial Note on Part 75

#### Editorial Note:

The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

#### § 75.602 Trailing cable junctions.

[Statutory Provision]

When two or more trailing cables junction to the same distribution center, means shall be provided to assure against connecting a trailing cable to the wrong size circuit breaker.
On November 17, 2011, Mr. Ted Hake, production manager at Universal Seed Company, made a public 

statement at the meeting seeking public comment on the Roundup Ready Sugar Beet draft 

Environmental Impact Statement in Corvallis, OR (pp. 80-81 of the transcript at 

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0047-4655 )

On November 28, 2011, a comment from Mr. Hake was posted to correct information provided earlier 

by him in his 11/17/2011 oral public comment. 

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0047-3281

On December 7, 2011, another comment from Mr. Hake was posted to further correct information 

provided earlier by him in his 11/17/2011 oral public comment. 

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0047-3512

The attachment accompanying this posting includes emails between BRS and Mr. Tichinin, Mr. Hake’s 

supervisor and President of Universal Seed Company, during the period between January 19, 2012 and 

January 24, 2012, to further explain and clarify Mr. Hake’s submitted public comments with respect to 

which particular years of vegetable beet seed harvests were tested in 2010, the number of fields in 

each particular year that tested positive for the H7-1 trait, and the submission of new results from 

seed that was harvested and tested in 2011.
### §71102. Requests for information

The Administrator shall issue requests for information on—

(1) a low-cost space mission with the purpose of rendezvousing with, attaching a tracking device,1 and characterizing the Apophis asteroid; and

(2) a medium-sized space mission with the purpose of detecting near-Earth objects equal to or greater than 140 meters in diameter.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3439.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 71102 | 42 U.S.C. 17793. | Pub. L. 110–422, title VIII, §803, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4803. |

Section

1 So in original. The comma probably should be preceded by "to".
Map 3-32: FSIM Fire

Probabililty Categories

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning

Area

BLM Field Office

Boundaries

Forest Service Planning

Unit Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority

Habitat Management Area

(Core)

Sage Grouse Priority

Habitat Management Area

(Connectivity)

County Boundaries

FSIM Fire Probability

Categories

Zero

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

9

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: This map displays fire probability classes

across Greater Sage Grouse priority and general

habitat management areas only.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134764 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134764 COA: 277169 Wayne CC: 95-012837-01 COREY MANNING, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
##### 



EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-08609 of Greene County Bancshares, Inc. of our
report dated January 16, 2003 on the consolidated financial statements of
Greene County Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 as included in the
registrants annual report on Form 10-K.

| |  |                                  
| |  | ---------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Brentwood, Tennessee
March 25, 2003
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDetermination of Cross-Sectional Area of Focused Picosecond Gaussian Laser BeamMeasurement of the waist diameter of a focused Gaussian-beam at the 1/e(sup 2) intensity, also referred to as spot size, is key to determining the fluence in laser processing experiments. Spot size measurements are also helpful to calculate the threshold energy and threshold fluence of a given material. This work reports an application of a conventional method, by analyzing single laser ablated spots for different laser pulse energies, to determine the cross-sectional area of a focused Gaussian-beam, which has a nominal pulse width of approx. 10 ps. Polished tungsten was used as the target material, due to its low surface roughness and low ablation threshold, to measure the beam waist diameter. From the ablative spot measurements, the ablation threshold fluence of the tungsten substrate was also calculated.Document ID20180001865Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLedesma, Rodolfo*(Virginia Univ. Charlottesville, VA, United States)*Fitz-Gerald, James*(Virginia Univ. Charlottesville, VA, United States)*Palmieri, Frank*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Connell, John*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 12, 2018Publication DateFebruary 1, 2018Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-29237NASA/TM-2018-219809L-20906Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 826611.04.07.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180001865.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
4500445684 10/07

cc ‘ (93O3L /2I

PUBLICATIONS AUTHORIZATION AND INVOICE

PUbLICATIONS AUTHORIZATION (To be completed by agency) I

TO: (NAME AND ADDRESS OF NEWSPAPER) • FEDERAL (.0. NO.,50C. SEC. NO. FROM: (NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENCY) ENCVTELEPH0NE NO.

The Morning Call : 23—0337560 Yvette M. House : 717—787—9495

P.O. Box 1260 Bureau of Air Qual±ty

Allentown, PA 18105 12th Floor

Harrisburg, PA 17109

HEREWITH (S ENCLOSED COPY FOR PUBLJCATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FO)1 PROPOSALS TO TYPE OF AD

EMPLOY PURCHASE fl CONTRACT SELL CLASSIFIED LEGAL NOTICE

PUBUSH ADVERTISEMENT (Np. OFTIMES) MAXIMUM NO. OF LINES DATE ORDER NO.

1 December 6, 2009

DATES OF INSER11ON SIGNATUFjOR AGENCY

December 10, 2009 . Ja- E 14)

You, as vendor, are authorized to publish this advertisement in your newspaper, subject to the terms of this order, as

follows: Advertisement to be published in regular advertising columns, no position specified; caption.of two lines and signatureto be in capitals and subject matter and title of officer-to be set solid in ype egjjy used by_your newspaper for public (legal)

notice advertising; charge to be made at the rate charged to and paid by commercial advertisers for matter similarly set and

occupying similar space; advertisement to be run in the editions specified above. Vendor agrees that, in the performance of anycontract awarded to it hereunder, said vendor will not discriminate against any employe or other persons on account of race, color,

sex, religious creed, ancestry, age or national origin and that the Commonwealth, upon receipt of satisfactory evidence of suchdiscrimination, shall have the right to cancel said contract. Return this copyat once if you will not accept this advertisement underthe terms

set forth.

Proof of advertising in the form of a tearsheet must be included on Parts 1,2 & 3. Return original and two copies (signed

by the editor or publisher) to Agency listed above. Part 1 must be notarized. Part 4 is yours.

Commonwealth to be billed only for actual number of printed lines published.

FUND DEPT APP YEAR LOG ORG COST FINCTION OBJ AMOUNT

ACCOUNT - -

. I .. . . , — , - •

coDE ‘ /-)

c

:j:-Ici

&L

3’7O4t7fS3 1-

INVOICE (To be completed by publisher):

DATEOFINSERTION ACTUALNO.OFPRINTEOUNES COSTPERLINE TOTALAMOUNT

istAd U?ec.erer JO 5.73 52

2ndAd ..

. 9oo — - 500

3rd Ad •. . .

.

-

/-?.rtcc( fE’ / €20

I

GRAND TOTAL-” 7g5

. . ot oe

-.ETH’RE

Con 1oçwe of Pennsylvania

County of Lf?

Before me!e subscriber, a Notary Public in and for dCon pers.onally came

__________________________________

h

b

i

d

l

d

th d

_________________________________________________________________

(poanj\ay that he is”

_______________________________________________________________

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

STD—521 REV. 12-88

INVccSNO.

152183
### SUBCHAPTER VI—ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
§ 77.1108-1 Type and capacity of firefighting equipment. Firefighting equipment required under this § 77.1108 shall meet the following minimum requirements: ( a ) *Waterlines.* Waterlines shall be capable of delivering 50 gallons of water a minute at a nozzle pressure of 50 pounds per square inch. Where storage tanks are used as a source of water supply, the tanks shall be of 1,000-gallon capacity for each 1,000 tons of coal processed (average) per shift.
( b ) *Fire extinguishers.* Fire extinguishers shall be: ( 1 ) Of the appropriate type for the particular fire hazard involved;
( 2 ) Adequate in number and size for the particular fire hazard involved;
( 3 ) Replaced immediately with fully charged extinguishers after any discharge is made from an extinguisher; and
( 4 ) Approved by the Underwriter's Laboratories, Inc., or the Factory Mutual Research Corp., or other competent testing agency acceptable to the Mine Safety and Health Administration.
( c ) *Fire hose.* Fire hose and couplings shall meet the requirements of the Underwriter's Laboratories, Inc., or Factory Mutual Research Corp.'s specifications. Cotton or cotton-polyester jacketed hose shall be treated in accordance with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Specification 182 for mildew resistance. The water pressure at the hose nozzle shall not be excessively high so as to present a hazard to the nozzle operator.
[36 FR 9364, May 22, 1971, as amended at 47 FR 28096, June 29, 1982]
### §21121. Establishment of program

#### (a) In general

Not later than 1 year after the appointment of its members, the Election Assistance Commission shall develop a program to be known as the "Help America Vote College Program" (hereafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Program").

#### (b) Purposes of Program

The purpose of the Program shall be—

(1) to encourage students enrolled at institutions of higher education (including community colleges) to assist State and local governments in the administration of elections by serving as nonpartisan poll workers or assistants; and

(2) to encourage State and local governments to use the services of the students participating in the Program.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title V, §501, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1717.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15521 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### Sammy Cosimo, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Fred Hollenbeck, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Special Term, denying his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. These actions in negligence combined in a single pleading stem from a collision between a motor vehicle owned by plaintiff husband and operated by his wife and a farm tractor owned by defendant and operated by one Stavridis, an occasional part-time employee, which occurred in the evening of December 18, 1959 on a public highway in Cortland County. Stavridis was killed in the accident. The applicability of the rebut-table presumption under former section 59 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law *(St. Andrassy*v. *Mooney,*262 N. Y. 368, 371) as a basis for imposing derivative liability for any negligence attributable to the driver, dependent in this case upon the use to which the tractor had been put (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 2, subd. 1 [now contained in § 125]), presents a question of fact which precludes summary judgment. *(W erf el*v. *Zivnostenslca Banka,*287 N. Y. 91, 93.) Moreover, the facts on the issue of user are solely within the knowledge of defendant. *(Be France*v. *Oestrike,*8 A D 2d 735.) Defendant’s statement that he had granted permission to Stavridis to use the vehicle only for the purpose of towing a disabled automobile from a ditch near his home — the accident happened about 9:00 p.m. a few miles from the ditch site — although uncontradieted presents a question of credibility and cannot be deemed to rebut as a matter of law the presumption created by the statute. *(Piwowarslci*v. *Cornwell,*273 N. Y. 226, 228-229; *Leotta*v. *Plessinger,*8 N Y 2d 449, 461.) ¡Special Term correctly denied the motion. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.