# ( Bharat Mathur 

## INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT We ProtectHoosiers andOurEnvironment. MitchellE. DanielsJr. 1 00 North SenateAvenue Govemor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317} 232-8603 

### Thomas W. 

### Easterly Toll Free (800} 451-6027 Commissioner www.ldem.IN.gov



### December 10, 2009 

## Acting RegionalAdministrator U.S. EPA, Region 5 

## RECEIVED 

# DEC 14 

# 2009

77West JacksonBoulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604

DearMr. Mathur: u.:::. '"•"' OFFICEOFR£GIO.NAUOMmL'>iit>iTOR



## Re: StateImplementationPlan Submittal for IndianaRegarding 326 lAC 7-4-14; Operations at ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC, LSA#07-88

Pursuant to Section 110 ofthe 1990 Clean Air ActAmendments andTitle 13 ofthe Indiana Code, the IndianaDepartment ofEnvironmental Management (IDEM) submits an amendment to the Indiana state implementation plan (SIP). This rulerevision amends Indiana's sulfur dioxide emission limitation rule for PorterCounty at 326 lAC 7-4-14. This rule was adopted ina rulemakingthat also amended 326 lAC 6-6-5 concerning ArcelorMittal's fugitive particulatematteremission·control plan. At this time, IDEM is not requesting SIP approval oftheamendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5.

Sulfurdioxide (S02 ) emission limits for sources at ArcelorMittal are listed at 326 lAC 7-4-14. The rule established an S02limit for the facility's blast furnace gas flare. The so2 emission limits established inthis rule for processesusingtheblast furnace gas account for all ofthe availableblast furnace gas; therefore, theemission limit for theblast furnace gas flare isredundant andunnecessary to assure continuedprotectionoftheNational Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for S02 inPorterCounty. Removingthe S02blast furnace gas flare limit from 326lAC 7-4-14 will notresult in orallow an increase in actual so2 emissions.

The rule was final adopted onJuly 1, 2009, bythe AirPollutionControl Board. No
commentswerereceived at thehearing. Therule was filed withthe Publisherofthe Indiana Register on September 29,2009, and becameeffective onOctober29,2009. No modeling

was necessary for this submittal.

RecycledPaper 

## (i) An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle ()

## Throughoutthe development ofthese amendments totheexistingrule, 326lAC 7-4- 14, IDEMstaffworkedcloselywithyour staffto ensurethat anypotentialproblemsthat might exist withthisrequested stateimplementationplanrevision wouldberesolved. I request that U.S. EPA approve these modifications oflndiana's state implementationplan. If
you have anyquestions regarding this submittal, please contact Scott Deloney, AirPrograms BranchChief, Office ofAirQuality at317-233-5694.

TE/as Attachments: SupportingDocuments

cc: SteveRosenthal ThomasW. Easterly SIP file Sincerely,

omas W. Easterly Commissioner 

## (



# (

# c·.

( SupportingDocuments

AttachmentA: Finalrule. LSADocument#07-88(F) aspublished

## inthe Indiana RegisteronOctober28, 2009 (20091028-IR-326070088FRA)

' 

### AttachmentB: Signaturepage

Attachment C: SecondNotice aspublished

## intheIndianaRegisteronAugust 8, 2007 (20070808-IR-326070088SNA)

AttachmentD:Publishers' Affidavits

AttachmentE: Transcript ofFirstPublicHearingheldonOctober 3, 2007

AttachmentF: Transcript-ofSecondPublicHearingheldonAprill, 2009

Attachment G: Tran.Script ofThirdPublicHearingheldonJuly 1, 2009

AttachmentH: Proposedrule as published 

## inthe IndianaRegister'onOctober

## 31, 20<17 · (20071031-IR-326070088PRA)

. , .

AttachmentI: 

## ProPOSed rule aspublished 

## inthe

.IndianaRegisteronMay 13,2009 · (20090513-IR·326070088PRA)
, .r

. .



### Attachment

## J: Administrative Checklist ( 40CFR51,Appendix 

### V) . <



### ..

' · ·' ·



### '



# ..

# ATTACHMENT A

# ( Indiana Register riTLE 326 AIR POLLU1.10N CONTROL BOARD

Final Rule LSA Document #07-88(F)

DIGEST

Amends 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4

-14 concerning operations at ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC. 

### NOTE: Under IC 13-14-9-11. 

### LSA Document#07-88, postedat20071031-IR-326070088PRA

. was resubmittedfor publication andreposted at20090513-IR-326070088PRA. 

### Effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher.

HISTORY First Notice: February 21,2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070221-IR-326070088FNA). Second Notice: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA). Notice of first Hearing: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808-IR

-326070088PHA). Date of First Hearing: October 3, 2007. Proposed Rule: October 31, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20071031

-IR-326070088PRA) Notice ofSecond Hearing: October 31, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20071 031-IR

-326070088PHA). Change in Notice of Public Hearing: January 16, 2008, Indiana Register (DIN: 20080116-IR

-326070088CHA). Change in Notice of Public Hearing: December 3, 2008, Indiana Register (DIN: 20081203

-IR

-326070088CHA). Change in Notice of Public Hearing: February 25, 2009, Indiana Register (DIN: 20090225-IR

-326070088CHA)

. Date ofSecond Hearing: April 1, 2009. Proposed Rule: May 13, 2009, Indiana Register (DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA). Notice ofThird Hearing: May 13, 2009, Indiana Register (DIN: 20090513-!R-326070088PHA). Date ofThird Hearing: July 1, 2009.

326 lAC 6..§-5; 326 lAC 7-4-14

SECTION 1. 326 lAC 6-6-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 lAC 6..§-5 ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC fugitive particulate matter emission control plan Authority: IC 13

-14-8; IC 13-17 Affected: IC 4-21 .5; IC 13-11-2-205; IC 13·15

Sec. 5.**~a)** 

### In ereler te imf)lement its nentfEIEiitienal**fugi~ve** 

### Elust eentrel f)regram, Betl=llel=lem shall flurel=leso a higt:l f)ressure water Rushing truelt anEI a tFeetor sweef)erwitt:ll;)reem anel install a water filling station for the fh:.tel=ler**tr~:~olt** 

### anEI a tanlt for the storage anEI Elisf)ensing of liquiel el=lemieal E11:1st retardant. Tl=le following eontrol
measures shall then l;)e implemented at the Burns Hareor Plant at the speei#ied fre(;lueney. (1) A tetal oftwenty fo1:1r**~24)** 

### miles of paveEI aRe uApoved reeels as sl=lewn iA Figure 1 shalll;)e eentFOIIoEI as desoril;)ed eelew: (A) A total of 12.7 miles ofpaved reads sl=lalll;)e eleanoEl tl=lree (6) 

### times per ·.vee!( ey water ·•·

..asAiAg using a tlusl=ter truek**oMee~t** 

### as indieated iA s1:1eseetien (a)(4) oftAis seetion. In additieA
, at least twioe per week, 7.9 miles eftt:lese roaEls in tAo**~rimaFy** 

### feeilities area will also l;)e wet swept**~:~siR§** 

### a treater**mo~:~Ated** 

### ereem follewiA§ tl=lo ftushortrue!<. Read sl=lo1:1lders en the 12.7 miles efpaved reads willl;)e graeled as req1:1ired aAEl treateEI with a ehemieal dust retardant attl=\e same frequeney speei#ied l:lelew for**I:IA~a·,eEI** 

### reaEie. Aeeum1:1lated material en reoEI sl=\eulelers willl;)e removes at least eAee**~er** 

### mentA. (8)A total of 11.6 miles of unpaveEI reaEis sl=\olll;)e ooAtrolleel. Tl=lis will eensist offormiA§ a unifeFFA road surfeee l;)y FOad gradiAg to remove large material, aAd tAe applieatien ofa twa (2) to four (4) inel=l layer of fine slag where AeeessoFy.**S~:~Ffaees** 

### sl=lall be**s~royed** 

### with Elust suppressaAt sol1:1tion at an applieatien rote eoAsisteAt ·.vitt:l tl=le monufoeturer's reeemmendatiens. Tl=le Elust supprossaAt material aAd applieatien rate st:lall ee sueR that a erust will eo fermeEI oA tl=le FOod**e~:~rfeee** 

### tt:lat is amenal31e to eleaAiAg \fie Rusl=liAg eAd**s>.vee~iAg.** 

### ReaEI surfeees st:loll eo eleanea Wl'iee**~er** 

### >#eel( witA a Rusl=ler tr1:1ek JolloweEI ey a traeter mouAteEI bream. Read surfeees sl=lall ee**res~rayeel** 

### witt:l el'lemieal El1:1st**su~~ressaAt** 

### as AeoessaFy to maiAtain a eleaAal;)le sur=faee. Tl=le solution streAgtl=l aAd BJ:!plieatioA rate willl;)e determiAoEI prier to**ap~lieatieA** 

### l;)aseEI upeA tl=le eenditioA ofthe surfeees. (2) Bethlel=lem shall eeAtFOI ils lew 'lolatile eeal storage**~iles** 

### l;)y**s~raying** 

### tl=lem at least enee**~or** 

### weal< witl=l a

Date: Nov 05,2000 9:40:13AM EST DIN: 20091028-IR-326070088FRA Page 1

# ( Indiana Register ef!effiieal eust retereaAt. (3) 

### ReeerEis ef all ftigitive aust eeRwal aeti'l•ities sflall ee ffiaiRteiRea. At

### a ffiiRiffiuffi, reeeres sflall eeRteiR tRe fellewiRg iRfeFfflalieR: 

### Eft.)**A~;~ffieer** 

### efffiiles aRe leeatieR eftfle pa·

..ee reaEie eleaRee; (B) Rl;fffiBer efffiilee efuRpa·

..ee reaEis wfliefl were treatee iReluEiiRg tfle type, EtUaRtity, aRe eilutieA ratie ef**e~:.~et** 

### retaFEleAt usee; (C) tfle type, EjUaAtity, aRe ElilutieA retia ef

### E11c1st reterEiaAt SJ'lrayeEi eA lew velatile eeal sterage piles. TRia iRfeFfflalieA sf:lall ee euffiffiaFiZ:eEi iAte pregress reperte aRe**e&.od~ffiitteEI** 

### te tAe eeerEI Ejuarterly. (4) Tlolis AeAtraeitieAal ftigitive Elust eeAtrel pregraffi eaA ee aEijustee eA a Eiaily easis as AeeEieEI 

### tetake iAte aeeeuAt preeeeiAg Elay eAEi fereeasteEi meteorologieal eeAEiitieAs (fer e*amplo, FaiAfall aAEI tempeFatl:lre), aAEi visual ebseF¥alieAs oftlole roaEiways sel'leeh:lleEi to ee eleaAeEI.

(e) Betl=lleReffi Steel CerperatioA AOAtraeitieAal ftlgitive eust eeAtrol roaes is si=lowA as fellows (Figura 1 ):



### (a) ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submita fugitive particulate matteremission control planfor the Burns Harbor Plant (Plant 10 

### 127..00001) located at U.S. 

### Highway 12 meeting the requirements ofthis section to the departmentwithin three (3) months afterthe effective date ofthis rule, notwithstanding section 3 ofthis rule. The plan shall be in accordance with and subjecttothefollowing requirements: (1) 

### 326 lAC 6-4=§

. (2) Emission factors and control efficiencies in 326 lAC 6-5-1(d)(1) through 326 lAC 6-5-1(d)(3). (3) ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC may petition the commissionerto use emission factors and control efficiencies other than those referenced In subdivision (2) ifadequate supportdocumentation is submitted demonstrating thatthe submitted emission factors and control efficiencies provide equivalent protection for human health and theenvironment.

(b) The following definitions applythroughoutthis section: (1) 

### "As needed basis" means thefrequency ofapplication necessary to minimize visible particulate matteremissions as defined In the control plan. (2) "Fugitive particulate matteremissions" means particulate matterthat Is emittedfrom any source by
means otherthan through a stack.

Date: Nov05,2009 9:40:13AM EST DIN: 20091028-IR

- 326070088FRA Page2

# (



# G Indiana Register (3) "Open aggregate pile" meansthe unenclosed storage ofcoal, which 

### Is finerthan two hundred (200) mash size equalto orgreaterthan one percent (1%) byweight.Open aggregate material meshsize shall 

### bedetermined bythe "AmericanAssociation ofState Highwayand Transportation Officials Test MethodT27-74''*, orotherproceduresequivalent In reliability asapproved bythe commissioner. (4) "Paved road" means anyasphaltorconcrete surfaced thoroughfareor right-of-way:

(A) designed orused forvehiculartraffic; and (B) located onthe propertyof, orowned by, ArcelorMittal Burna Harbor LLC. (5) "Potentialemissions" means fugitive particulate matteremissionscalculated aftertheapplication ofairpollution control:

(A) measures; or (B) equipment (6)

..RACM" means reasonably available control measure. (7) "Unpaved roads" meansanysurfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way, otherthan a paved road as defined In subdivision (4), that 

### Is:

(A)designed or usedforvehiculartraffic; and (B) locatedonthe propertyof,orowned by, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC.

(c)The contents and record keeping requirementsforthefugitive particulate matteremissions control plan are asfollows: (1)The control plan shall be in writingand Include, ata minimum, the following information: (A) 'l'he nama and addressofthe owneroroperatorresponsibleforthe Implementation ofthe control plan. (B) Identification ofall:

(I) open aggregate pile areas; (II) paved roads; and 

### (ill) unpaved roads; that have the potential 

### to emitfugitive particulate matteremissions In accordancewith subsection 

### (d). (C) A mapoftheArcelorMittal Bums Harbor LLC property showing thefollowing:

(I) Open aggregate pile areas. (II) Accessareas aroundtheopenaggregate piles. (01) Unpaved roads. (lv) Paved roads. (D) The quantityand types ofvehicularactivityoccurring on thefollowing:

(I) Paved roads. (11) Unpaved roads. (E) Quantityofopenaggregate pliesthat havethe potential 

### toemitfugitive particulate matter emissions. (F) The equipment usedto maintain open aggregate piles. (G) A description ofthe control measures to be Implementedtocontrolfugitive particulate matter emissions resulting from potential emission points Identified In clause (B). (H) A specifiCation ofthedustsuppressant materialthatwill be used, such as oil orchemical, Includingthe estimated frequencyand rates ofapplication, rates, andconcentrationsofthedust suppi'88Sant (l)A specification ofthe particulate mattercollection equipmentthatwill be used asa fugitive particulate matteremission control measure. (J) A schedule

### ofcompliance withthe provisionsofthe control plan.The scheduleshallspecifythe amountoftimethesource requiresto:

(l)award any necessary contracts; and (II) commenceand completeconstruction, Installation, ormodification ofthefugitive particulate matteremission control measures

. (K) Other relevant datathat may

### be requested bythecommissioner

### to evaluate theeffectiveness of thecontrol plan. (2) Recordsthatdocumentall control measures and activities to

### be Implemented in accordancewith the approvedcontrol plan shall 

### be: (A) keptand maintained atArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC; (B) retained for at leastfive (5) years; and (C) made available upon the request ofthe commissioner.

(d) All control measures specified In this subsection shall 

### beconsidered RACM. The frequency of

Date: Nov 05,2009 9:40:13AM EST DIN: 20091028-IR-326070088FRA Page3

# ( Indiana Register application for all control measures shall be detailed Inthe control plan. No control plan shall contain control measures that violate the applicable provisions ofstate statutes or rules. Fugitive particulate matteremissions from the emission points specified in this section shall be controlled as follows: (1) Paved roads and unpaved roads as follows:

(A) Paved roads by the use ofone (1) ormore ofthe following measures:

(i) Cleaning byvacuum sweeping. (ii) 

### Flushing. (iii) An alternate RACM that Is equivalent In effectiveness to either item (I) or (ii). 

### (B) Unpaved roads bythe useofone (1) ormore ofthefollowing measures:

(i) Paving with a material such as asphaltorconcrete. (ii) Treating with a suitable and effective commercially available petroleum based dustsuppressant
orwater baseddust suppressant. The frequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. 

### (iii) Spraying with water. Thefrequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. (iv) Double chipand seal the road surface and maintain on an as needed basis. (v) An alternate RACM that isequivalent in effectiveness to one (1) or more ofthe above measures. (2) Open aggregate piles bythe use ofone (1) or moreofthefollowing measures: (A) Cleaning thearea around the perimeterofthe aggregate piles. (B) Applying a suitable and effective oll orotherdustsuppressanton an as needed basis. (C) An alternate RACM that Is equivalent in effectivenessto one (1) or more ofthe above measures.

(e) The approval ofthe control plan shall be in accordance with the following: (1) Within three (3) months of receiving a control plan, the commissionershall notifyArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC of:

(A) the approval ofthe control plan; (B) modifications thatthe commissioner deems necessary to the control plan; or (C) disapproval ofthe control plan. (2) Ifthe commissionerfinds a control plan to be Incomplete, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall providethe commissionerwith the required additional information. (3) In determining ifan alternate control measure represents a RACM as specified in this section, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submitandthe commissionershall consider information pertaining to factors, including, but not limited to, thefollowing:

(A) The impacton the environment in terms ofany increase In water, air, orsolid waste pollution emissions. (B) The energy requirements ofthe selected control measure. (C) The:

(i) capital expenditure; (li) impact on production; and (iii) operating costs; to implementthe selected control measure. (D) The Impactofthese costs. (4) Ifa control plan is disapproved bythe commissioner, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall have up to thirty (30) days from the date ofreceipt ofthedisapproval letterto request, in writing, a hearing on the matter. In the eventa hearing is requested: (A) it shall be held in accordance with the requirements set forth In IC 4-21.5; and (B) the burden ofproofshall lie with ArcelorMittal Bums Harbor LLC to demonstrate whythecontrol plan is appropriate. · (5) The control plan approved by the commissionershall become partofArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC's operating permit. (6) Changes may be made to the control plan without reopening the operating permit by submitting a revised control plan tothe commissionerfor approval In accordance with this subsection.



### (f) The control plan shall be updated atthe time of reapplication forthe source's operating permitor as required in 326 lAC 2

.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. The documents are available for review and copying atthe Indiana Departmentof Environmental Management, Office ofAirQuality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North SenateAvenue, Indianapolis, Indiana46204. (AirPollution ControlBoard; 326 lAC 6

-6

-5; filed Mar 10. 1988, 1:20p.m.: 111R2510; readoptedfiledJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24/R 1477; filedSep 29, 2009, 3:00p.m.: 20091028=1R-326070088FRAJ

Date: Nov05,2009 9:40:13AM EST DIN: 20091028-IR-326070088FRA Page4

# ( Indiana Register

SECTION 2. 326 lAC 7-4-14 ISAMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

3261AC 7-4-14 PorterCounty sulfurdioxideemission limitations Authority: IC 13-14

-8; IC 13·11 Affected: IC 13-15

Sec. 14. The following sources and facilities located in Porter County shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations in pounds per million Btu (!bs/MMBtu) and pounds per hour (lbs/hr), unless otherwise specified, and other requirements: (1) BeH:lleheffl Steel ArcelorMittal Burns**Hamor~** 

### LLC shall complywith the following:

(A) The following facilities shall bum natural gasonly:



### (i) BOF Shop FM Boiler. (ii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Hardening and Annealing HeatTreatment Furnace. (iii) 160 inch Plate Mill Boilers No.2 and 4. (iv) 

### Batch Annealing Furnaces (24). (v) Continuous HeatTreat Line- Preheat, Heating and Soaking, and Reheat. (B)The following facilities shall comply with the sulfurdioxide emission limitations and other requirements:

Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast**Ft~maee** 

### FlaFe 

## tiYt (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Undertire 

### (Yt1 (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire**~(vi)** 

### Slab Mill Soaking Pits: lbs/MMBtu 0.83 0.83 

### 9m Emission Limitations

1.0 pound perton process material 1.73 1.96 lbs/hr 545 545

400 803 911



### (AA) 

### Ne Notmore than nine (9) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may befired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions notto exceed four hundred eighty-two (482) pounds per hour. (BB) The remaining twenty-three (23) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may bum blast furnace 

### aREIIefor natural gas, or both. with total sulfurdioxide emissions notto exceed twenty-four (24) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may bum blast furnace 

### aREIIef or natural gas, orboth, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour.**~** 

### (vli) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 1 and Boiler No. 1 1.96 299**~** 

### (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 2 and Boiler No. 3 

### 1.96 299 

## W(ix} 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 

### 1, 2, and 

### 3 1.96 79 each**~** 

### (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2 1.96 441**~** 

### (xl) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace 1.07 88**~** 

### (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill 

### I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 4 and 

### 5 1.96 274**~** 

### (xlfl) 160 inch Plate Mill! 

### &

### 0 Furnaces No.6 and 7 1.96 274**~** 

### (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill 

### I& 

### 0 Furnace No. 

### 8 1.96 176**~**

### (xv) Power Station Boiler No. 7 0.8 520**~** 

### (xvi) Power Station Boilers No.8, 

### 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.45 2,798 (C)

### As an alternative to the sulfurdioxide emission limitations specified 

### in clause 

### (B), Bett:\lel:leFR Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and other requirements asfollows:

Facility Description 

### (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Bleat 

### R:IFRaee Flare 

## tiYt (lli) Sinter PlantWindbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire

Date: Nov05,2009 9:40:13AM EST 

### lbs/MMBtu 0.75 0.75**~** 

### Emission Limitations

1.0 pound perton process material 1.57

DIN: 20091028·1R-326070088FRA 

### lbslhr 498 498

400 730

PageS

# ( Indiana Register**~** (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire 1.78 828**~(vi)** Slab Mill Soaking Pits: (AA)

### Ne Notmore than six (6) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may befired on coke
oven gasatthe same time with total sulfurdioxide emissions notto exceed two hundred ninety-two (292) pounds per hour. (BB)The remaining twenty-six (26) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may bum blast furnace

### eflEflet: or natural gas, or both, with total sulfurdioxide emissions notto exceed twenty-seven (27) pounds per hour. (CC)Thefour(4)vertically discharged soaking pits may bum blastfurnace 

### 8REUef or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour.**~{vii)** 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 1 and Boiler No. 1 1. 78 293**~(viii)** 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No.2 and Boiler No.3 1.78 293**~** 

### (lx) 80 inch HotStrip Mill Furnace No. 1, 2, and 3 1.78 483 each**~** (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2 1.78 401**~** (xl) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace 1.07 88**~** {xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 4 and 5 1.78 249 If 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### &

### 0 Furnaces No. 6 

### aAEIIeF or7, orboth, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 4 and 5 shall notoperate orshall bum natural gasonly.**~** (XIII) 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### &

### 0 Furnaces No. 6 and 7 1.78 249 If 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### &0 Furnaces No. 4 

### aREIIeF or5, or both,are in operation on a fuel otherthan natural gas, Furnaces No. 6 and 7 shall notoperate orshall bum natural gasonly.**~** (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnace No. 8 1.78 160 

### t.IEYij (xv) Power Station Boilers No. 7 0.8 520**~** (xvl) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.45total 2,500 total (>E\'iii) BelhleheFR Steel (xvil)ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall notifythe department at least twenty-four (24) hours priorto reliance on the alternative set of limits specified in items (i)**through~** BeUtleheFR s•eel (xvl).ArcelorMittal Bums Harbor LLC shall maintain records offuel type and operational status·Offacilities listed in items (xll) and (xiii) 

### aREI ()(iV) and shall makethe records available to the department upon request.**~** (xviii) Forthe purposes of3261AC 7-2-1(c)(2), compliance shall 

### be determined based on separate calendar month averages for the set of requirements specified in this clause and for the setof requirements specified in clause (B). (D) Coke oven gas usage atfacilities other than the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted toRe not more than seventy-five (75) million cubicfeet perday. Total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (B)(i) through (B)(iv), (B)(·.·iiHAi\)

...Fe1:1gh (B)(•;iiHBB), (B)(viil)

...Fel:lQR**~** (B)(III), {B)(vi)(AA)through (B)(vi)(BB), (B)(vli)through (B)(x), and (B)()(iii)**tAre~:~gh** (B)(>E\'ii) (B)(xii)through (B)(xvi) shall notexceed four thousand four hundred twenty-nine (4,429) pounds per hour. During periods in which the limits contained in clause (C) are in effect, coke oven gas usage atfacilities otherthanthe No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to M not more than seventy (70) million cubic feet perday, and total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through**(C)(iv~.** (C)(•;ii)(M)**thre~:~gl:t** (C)('Iii)(BB) (C)(viii) ""R:JI:lgl:t (C)()(i) (C)(IIi), (C)(vi)(AA)through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vil)through (C)(x), and (C)(Kiii)**tAre~:~gh** (CH)(\fii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) shall notexceed four thousand six hundred thirty (4,630) pounds per hour. (E) BetAieheFR Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall achieve compliance with the requirements specified in clause (B) or (C) prior

### to December 31, 1988. Thereafter, BetAieF!eFR Steel ArcelorMittal Bums Harbor LLC shall submit a report tothe departmentwithin thirty (30) daysfollowing the end ofeach calendar quarter containing thefollowing information:

(i) Records ofthe total coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, fuel oil, and natural gas usage for each day at each facility listed in clauses (B)lAFeli!!JA and (C). (ii) Records ofthe:

(AA) average sulfur content and heatingvalue as determined perthe procedures specified in clause (F) foreachfuel type used during the calendarquarter; and

### ei4Re (BB) maximum number ofslab mill soaking pits burning coke oven gasatanygiven time during each day. (iii) The calculated sulfur dioxide emission rate in the applicable emission units (pounds per hour, pounds per million Btu,

### eA6IeF orpounds per ton) for each facility foreach dayand the average sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (C)(i¥), (C)(·;ii)(,t\lt,) tAR:lt:IQR (C)(vii)(BB), (CH·;iii) ""R:llifiA (C)()(i) (C)(Iii), {C)(vi)(AA)through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vli) through {C)(x), and (C)(Miii)**tA~1:1gfl** (C)(>E\'ii) (C)(xii)through {C)(xvl) foreach day in pounds per hourduring the calendar quarter. (F) Be""leheFR Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a sampling and analysis protocol tothe

Date: Nov 05,2009 9:40:13AM EST DIN: 20091028-IR-326070088FRA PageSIndiana Register department by December 31, 1988. The protocol shall:



### (i) contain a description ofplanned procedures for:

(AA)sampling ofsulfur-bearing fuels and materials;

### fet: (BB)analysis ofthe sulfur content; and 

### fet: (CC) any planned direct measurement ofsulfur dioxide emissionsvented tothe atmosphere;**T~e** J:)reteeel eRaUand 

### (ii) specify the frequency ofsampling, analysis, 

### eA9IeF and measurement for each:

(AA) fuel and material; and fer**eae~** (BB) facility. The department shall incorporate the protocol intothe source's operation permit per procedures specified in 326 lAC 2

. The department may revise the protocol as necessaryto establish acceptable sampling, analysis, 

### eA9IeF and measurements procedures and frequency. The department mayalso require that a source conduct a stacktest atany facility listed in this subdivision within thirty (30} daysofwritten notification bythe department. (2) Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Station shall comply with thefollowing:

Facility Description (A) Boilers 7 and 8 Boilers 7 and 8 shall be fired with coal, fuel oil, or natural gas. (B) GasTurbine 10 (3) Midwest Steel shall complywith thefollowing: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 6.0 each

natural gas only

Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs/MMBtu Babcock and Wilcox Boiler 1 and Erie City Boilers No. 1, 2, and 3 1.33 each Only two (2} offour (4) boilers may bum fuel oil with a sulfurdioxide emission rate greaterthan three-tenths (0.3) pounds per million Btu atthe same time. Midwest Steel shall maintain records offuel type for each boiler for each hour. The records offuel type shall be made available tothe department upon request. (4) Air Products and Chemical shall comply with the following: Facility Description Emission Limitations All boilers and the No. 3 Hydrogen Reformer natural gas only (AirPollution Control Board; 326 lAC 7

-4-14: filedAug28, 1990, 4:50p.m.: 14 IR 78; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 241R 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35p.m.: 261R 1568; filed Sep 29, 2009, 3:00p.m.: 20091028

-IR

-326070088ERA)

LSA Document#07-88(E) ProposedRule: 20071 031

-IR

-326070088PBA: 20090513-IB

-326070088PBA Hearing Held: July 1, 2009 ApprovedbyAttorneyGeneral: September23, 2009 ApprovedbyGovernor: September29, 2009 Filed with Publisher: September29, 2009, 3:00p

.m. Documents IncorporatedbyReference: American Association ofState Highwayand Transportation Officials Test Method T27-74 Small Business Regulatory Coordinator:Alison Surface, IDEM Compliance and TechnicalAssistance Program

- OPPTA, MC 60-041GCS W041, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, IN46204-2251, (317) 232-8172 or(800) 988-7901, ctap@idem.in.gov SmallBusinessAssistance Program Ombudsman: BradBaughn, IDEMSmall BusinessAssistance Program Ombudsman, MC 50-01 JGCN 1307, 100North SenateAvenue, Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251, (317) 234-3386, bbaughn@idem.in.gov

Posted: 1012812009 byLegislative ServicesAgency An 

## html version ofthis document.

Date: Nov05,2009 9:40:13AM EST DIN: 20091028-IR-326070088FRA Page 7

# ATTACHMENT 

# B

# (

Rule#: 

## Agency: Subject:

ADOPTED: 

# Rule Signature Page

LSA.Document#07-88(F) Air

## Pollution ControlBoard**MittalSt~l**



## By: 

# 7fo.-,

# t(d..h-

ThomasAn®rson Acting 

## Chairperson Air

## PollutionControlBoard

APPROVEDAS TOFORMAND LEGALITY: 

# c

# B~~-- &00: 

# rt!J/tY'l

Attorney

## General, StateofIndiana--/

APPROVED:

By:

# 7u-£n-..u.~, Mitchell

# RDadels, Jr.

# ~ 

# 'l/

---·---- Date: 

# Zft/r(

-

Governor, Stateoflndiana

ACCEPTEDFORFll..ING:



## By: Indid "' TITLE 326 AlR POLLtmONCONTROL BOARD

# ~ LSADocument#07-38(FR)

Ftled

### withPublisbcr.**~**

### 29. 2009. 3:00 

### p.m. By:Kks

# ATTACHMENT 

# C

# •

•

• Indiana Register TITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

SECOND NOTICE OF COMMENT PERIOD LSA Document #07-88

DEVELOPMENT OF AMENDMENTS TO RULES CONCERNING OPERATIONS AT ISG BURNS HARBOR LLC

PURPOSE OF NOTICE The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM} has developed draft rule language for amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5, concerning ISG Burns Harbor LLC's fugitive particulate matter emission control plan, and to 326 lAC 7-4-14, concerning sulfur dioxide (S02 } emission limits for ISG Burns Harbor LLC's blast furnace flare. IDEM seeks comment on the affected citations listed and any other provisions ofTitle 326 that may be affected by this rulemaking.

HISTORY First Notice ofComment Period: February 21, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070221-IR-326070088FNA}.

CITATIONS AFFECTED: 326 lAC 6-6-5; 3261AC 7-4-14.

AUTHORITY: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11.

SUBJECT MATTER AND BASIC PURPOSE OF RULEMAKING Basic Purpose and Background The ISG Burns Harbor LLC plant operates two blast furnaces and is capable of producing over 5 million tons of raw steel annually. Hot-rolled, cold-rolled, and coated-sheet products are made at the site. Operations include
a 160" plate mill and a 110" plate mill capable of producing over one million tons of plate each year. ISG Burns Harbor LLC was formerly known as the Bethlehem Steel plant and is located on Lake Michigan in Northwestern Indiana. In two separate letters dated May 25, 2006, ISG Burns Harbor LLC formally requested that IDEM propose to the Air Pollution Control Board amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14. This rulemaking proposes amendments to two separate rules concerning fugitive particulate matter and sulfur dioxide emissions at ISG Burns Harbor LLC. 326 lAC 6-6-5 ISG Burns Harborfugitive particulate matter control plan The fugitive dust control strategy outlined in 326 lAC 6-6-5 has been effective since 1984 and addresses fugitive particulate matter emissions from roads and coal storage piles at the ISG Burns Harbor LLC steelmaking plant. The rule imposes requirements for controlling fugitive particulate matter emissions by prescribing the specific roads that are to be treated, the specific amount of dust suppressant, and the frequencies those roads
are to be treated. 326 lAC 6-6-5 also specifies the use ofa tractor mounted broom for controlling fugitive particulate matter. On May 4, 2006, ISG Burns Harbor LLC requested a variance from the requirements of 326 lAC 6-6-5 on the grounds that the rule does not permit the company the operational flexibility to reconfigure roads at the plant or to
use alternative dust suppressant equipment or application frequencies, as those details are specified in the rule. ISG Burns Harbor LLC maintains that the specific control strategies required by 326 lAC 6-6-5 do not permit alternative control strategies that may be more efficient, effective, and less costly. On November 17, 2006, IDEM granted a variance from the requirements of326 lAC 6-6-5 to ISG Burns Harbor LLC on the condition that the company implement an approved alternative fugitive particulate matter emissions control plan in place ofthe requirements outlined in 326 lAC 6-6-5. The variance is effective through December 5, 2007. The approved fugitive particulate matter emissions control plan is modeled after control plan requirements from 326 lAC 6-5-3 through 326 lAC 6-5-9. 326 lAC 6-5-3 through 326 lAC 6-5-9 outline the control requirements for particulate matter emissions, the contents of an appropriate fugitive particulate matter control plan, and the process for plan approval by IDEM. 326 lAC 7-4-14 Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations Blast furnace gas is a byproduct ofthe steelmaking process generated at the blast furnace. ISG Burns Harbor LLC cleans the blast furnace gas generated at their facility and uses it as a fuel in the blast furnace stoves, coke ovens, and the power station boilers. The blast furnace gas flare is a control device used to prevent
excess pressure from forming in the blast furnace gas supply line. The blast furnace gas flare is used when
excess gas is produced beyond the capacity ofthe blast furnace and combustion sources to consume it. 326 lAC 7-4-14 establishes a 0.071bs/MMBtu S02 emission limit for ISG Burns Harbor LLC's blast furnace flare. On May 4, 2006, ISG Burns Harbor LLC requested a variance from the 326 lAC 7-4-14 S02 emission limit for their blast furnace gas flare. 326 lAC 7-4-14 SO emission limits for the steelmaking plant attribute 100% ofthe available blast furnace gas as being used in theblast furnace stove, coke ovens, and the power station boilers.

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA Page 1Indiana Register ISG Burns Harbor LLC claimed that compliance with the S02 emission limits established for the processes using the blast furnace gas assures protection of the National Amo1ent Air Quality Standard for S02, regardless ofthe • presence of, or with, an SO emission limit for the blast furnace gas flare. In addition, ISG Burns Harbor LLC states that the sulfur contenl present in raw materials processed at the blast furnaces is highly variable. Because the nature ofthe steelmaking process requires a continuous addition of raw materials to the blast furnace, it is technically infeasible to manage the sulfur content of materials charged in the blast furnace to achieve compliance with the blast furnace flare S02 emission limit. Finally, ISG Burns Harbor LLC notes in the May 4, 2006, variance request that the blast furnace gas flare is necessary for the safe operation ofthe blast furnace gas distribution system, S02 emission limits are not imposed on flares for any other steelmaking operations or for any other flares in Indiana, and add-on control technologies do not currently exist for S02 emission control at blast furnace gas flares. On November 17, 2006, IDEM granted a variance from the blast furnace gas flare SO emission limit established in 326 lAC 7-4-14 to ISG Burns Harbor LLC. This variance is effective throughUecember 5, 2007. IC 13-14-9-41dentification of Restrictions and Requirements Not Imposed under Federal Law The draft rule imposes restrictions and requirements on persons to whom the draft rule applies that are "not imposed under federal law". This rulemaking amends the current state rule 326 lAC 6-6-5 and replaces the fugitive particulate matter emission control requirements with requirements for the submission of a fugitive particulate matter emission control plan for IDEM approval. (1) 326 lAC 6-6-5 serves an important function by outlining required practices in order to minimize the amount offugitive particulate matter introduced to the surrounding areas by the ISG Burns Harbor LLC steelmaking plant. All sections under 326 lAC 6-6 were disapproved as a proposed revision to Indiana's State Implementation Plan (SIP) effective March 9, 1987. As a result, 326 lAC 6-6-5 remains a state-only rule. U.S. EPA found in a final rulemaking action dated February 5, 1987 (52 FR 3640) that 326 lAC 6-6 was "not approvable under the Clean Air Act (Act) due to deficiencies in the regulation itself and in the modeling analysis and emission inventory submitted to support the regulation". The fugitive dust control plan outlined in 326 lAC 6-6- .Q was not mentioned in the U.S. EPA's discussion on deficiencies in 326 lAC 6-6. This rulemaking proposes to substitute the proscribed fugitive particulate matter control requirements of6-6-5 with a rule requiring ISG Burns Harbor LLC to submit and implement a fugitive particulate matter emission control plan for IDEM review and approval. (2) ISG Burns Harbor LLC expects the ability to modify its fugitive particulate matter emission control strategy will result in the same or better level offugitive particulate matter emission control more efficiently by allowing • the flexibility to amend the control plan strategy as required to address changes in road configurations or operations. Additionally, ISG Burns Harbor LLC requests the flexibility to develop a fugitive particulate matter control plan subject to IDEM's approval instead of having the plan prescribed by the rule. ISG Burns Harbor LLC believes that future revisions ofthe control plan will be more difficult and costly to achieve ifthe details of the control plan continue to be prescribed by rule. (3) IDEM relied in part on arguments for an alternative fugitive particulate matter control plan for ISG Burns Harbor LLC in the development ofthe proposed amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5. These arguments were contained in letters from ISG Burns Harbor LLC to IDEM dated May 4, 2006, May 25, 2006, and March 23, 2007. These letters are available for public inspection and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center-North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46205. Potential Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal burden on ISG Burns Harbor LLC as a result ofthis rulemaking. The rule should reduce costs for ISG Burns Harbor LLC as the ability to design a modern fugitive particulate matter emission control plan may reduce costs associated with maintaining outdated control equipment currently required under 326 lAC 6-6- 

### .Q. Public Participation and Workgroup Information No workgroup is planned for the rulemaking. Ifyou feel that a workgroup or other informal discussion on the rule is appropriate, please contact Sean Gorman, Rules Development Section, Office ofAir Quality at (317) 234-3533 or (800) 451-6021 (in Indiana).

SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST COMMENT PERIOD IDEM requested public comment from February 21,2007, through March 23, 2007, on alternative ways to achieve the purpose ofthe rule and suggestions for the development of draft rule language. IDEM received comments from the following party by the comment period deadline: ISG Burns Harbor LLC Following is a summary ofthe comments received and IDEM's responses thereto: Comment: The specific dust control measures required by 326 lAC 6-6-5 are no longer the most efficient or • effective methods for controlling fugitive emissions from the roadways at the Burns Harbor facility. ISG Burns Harbor LLC is the only steel mill facility in Indiana that has prescriptive fugitive dust control measures codified in a

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA Page 2

# •

•

• Indiana Register rule; ISG Burns Harbor LLC is seeking a change in the rule to be allowed to establish a control plan for IDEM review and approval, as other Indiana steel mills and manufacturing operations do

. Comment: We request that 326 lAC 6-6-5 be amended to allow ISG Burns Harbor LLC to operate underthe alternative fugitive particulate matter control plan approved by IDEM under the November 17, 2006 variance. We further request that ISG Burns Harbor LLC be permitted to update the control plan consistent with 326 lAC 6-5-8 "Revision of Control Plans". Comment: We suggest that 326 lAC 6-6-5 be amended to require ISG Burns Harbor LLC'S fugitive particulate matter emission control plan meet the content requirements of326 lAC 6-5-5 and the approval requirements of 326 lAC 6-5-7. Response: IDEM agrees that there may be more efficient and less costly methods for achieving at least the
same level offugitive particulate matter emission control as currently exists under 326 lAC 6-6-5. An amendment to 326 lAC 6-6-5 requiring the submission ofan alternative fugitive particulate matter control plan for IDEM review and approval will permit ISG Burns Harbor LLC the flexibility to adjust its control strategy as conditions or technologies dictate, while at the same time allowing IDEM to ensure that an appropriate level offugitive particulate matter control is maintained. Comment: The sulfur dioxide emission limit at 326 lAC 7-4-14 for ISG Burns Harbor LLC'S blast furnace flare represents the only S02 emission limit for a blast furnace flare in Indiana. All blast furnace gas flare S02 emission limits for sources in neighboring Lake County were recently removed based on IDEM's rationale that counting emissions from the flare effectively double counted emissions that were already being considered at the locations where blast furnace gas is burned at boilers, stoves, and the furnaces. Comment: Removing the blast furnace gas flare S02 emission limit from 326 lAC 7-4-14 will not affect the existing air quality modeling used to support the other emission limits in 326 lAC 7-4-14. The amount of blast furnace gas included in the S02 modeling for the combustion units at ISG Burns Harbor LLC greatly exceeds the total amount of blast furnace gas available, even without flares. Comment: Eliminating the S02 emission limit at the flare will not cause any increase in actual S02.emissions,
as ISG Burns Harbor LLC must continue to meet the S02 emission limits contained in 326 lAC 7-4-14 tor each of the combustion units. ISG Burns Harbor LLC uses as much blast furnace gas as possible to fuel boilers, stoves, and furnaces at the facility. The blast furnace gas flare is only used to control pressure in the blast furnace gas distribution system. Comment: The emission factor used to generate the blast furnace gas flare S02 emission limit of 0.07 lb/MMBtu has not been peer reviewed or incorporated into U.S. EPA's Compilation of Emission Factors. Flares
are inherently difficult to test and as a result, the emission factor is difficult to evaluate

.

. : Response: IDEM agrees that S02 emission limits are not imposed on flares for any other steelmaking operations orfor any other flares in lnaiana. IDEM finds that there will be no negative environmental impact on the ambient air quality with respect to 

### S0 2 emissions at ISG Burns Harbor LLC ifthe S02 emission limit for the blast furnace gas flare is removed from 32b lAC 7-4-14. Air quality modeling performed to establish the 326 lAC 7-4-14 S02 emission limits for emission points at the steelmaking plant attribute 100% ofthe available blast furnace gas as oeing consumed as fuel in the blast furnace stoves, coke ovens, and the power station boilers. Continued compliance with the 326 lAC 7-4-14 S02 emission limits for these processes using blast furnace gas assures protection ofthe National Ambient Air Quality Standard for S02 regardless ofthe presence of an S02 emission limit for the blast furnace gas flare.

REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS This notice requests the submission of comments on the draft rule language, including suggestions for specific revisions to language to be contained in the draft rule. Mailed comments should be addressed to: #07-88(APCB) ISG Burns Harbor LLC Sean Gorman Mail Code 61-50 c/o Administrative Assistant Rules Development Section Office ofAir Quality Indiana Department of Environmental Management 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. Hand delivered comments will be accepted by the receptionist on duty at the tenth floor reception desk, Office of Air Quality, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana. Comments may be submitted by facsimile at the IDEM fax number: (317) 233-2342, Monday through Friday, between 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. Please confirm the timely receipt offaxed comments by calling the Rules Development Section at (317) 233-0426

.
COMMENT PERIOD DEADLINE Comments must be postmarked, faxed, or hand delivered by September 7, 2007.

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA Page 3

### Indiana Register Additional information regarding this action may be obtained from Sean Gorman, Rules Development Section, Office of Air Quality, (317) 234-3533 

### or (800) 451-6027 

### (in Indiana).

DRAFT RULE



### SECTION 1. 326 

### lAC 6-6-5 

### IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 lAC 6-6-5 ISG Burns Harbor LLC fugitive particulate matter emission control plan Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11; IC 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 4-21.5; IC 13-11-2-205; IC 13-15; IC 13-17



### Sec. 5. (a) In OFeler to iFRj3loFRent its nontraelitional fugitive elust eontrolj3rograFR, Bett:llet:leFR st:lallj3uret:lase a t:ligt:l 13ressure water flust:ling truel< anel a traetor sweej3er witt:! brooFR anel install a water filling station for tt:le flust:ler truel< anel a tanl< for tt:le storage anel elisj3ensing of liEJuiel et:leFRieal elust retarelant. Tt:le following oontrol FReasures st:lall tt:len be iFRj3leFRenteel at tt:le Bums l-larbor Plant at tt:le Sj3eeifieel freEJueney. (1) A total oftwenty four (24) FRiles of 13aveel anelunj3aveel roaels as st:lo't't'R in Figure 1 st:lall be eontrolleel as eleseribeel below: (A) A total of 12.7 FRiles of 13aveel roaels st:lall be eleaneel tt:lree (3) tiFRes 130r wool< by water wast:ling using a flust:ler truel< OJtGOj3t as inelieateel in subseetion (a)(4) oftt:lis seetion. In aelelition, at least twiee 130r wool<, 7.9 FRiles oftt:lese roaels in tt:le 13riFRary faeilities area 'lt'ill also be wet swe13t using a traetor FRounteel breoFR following tt:le flust:ler truel<. Roael st:loulelers on tt:le 12.7 FRiles of 13aveel roaels will be graeleel as reEJuireel anel treateel witt:! a et:leFRieal elust retarelant at tt:le saFRe freEJueney Sj3oeifieel below for unj3a'IOel roaels. AeeuFRulateel FRaterial on roael st:loulelers will be reFRoveel at least onee 130r FRontt:l. (B) A total of 11.3 FRiles of un13aveel roaels st:lall be eontrolleel. Tt:lis will eonsist offorFRing a uniforFR roael surfaee by roael graeling to reFRove large FRaterial, anel tt:le aj3j31ieation of a t-wo (2) to four (4) 

### inet:l layer of fine slag wt:lere neeessaF)'. Surfaees st:lall be Sj3rayeel witt:! elust SUj3j3ressant solution at an a1313lieation rate eonsistent witt:! tt:le FRanufaeturer's reeoFRFRenelations. Tt:le elust SU1313ressant FRaterial anel a1313lieation rate st:lall be suet:! tt:lat a er1:1st will be foFR'!eel on tt:le roael s1:1rfaee tt:lat is aFRenable to eleaning via flf:lst:ling anel 

# •

swee13iRg. Roael s1:1rfaees st:lall be eleaneel Pv't'iee 13erwool< witt:! a flust:ler truel< follo'Noel by a traetor FRounteel • breoFR. Roael surfaees st:lall be resj3rayeel witt:! et:leFRieal elust SU!3!3ressant as neeessary to FRaintain a eleanable surfaee. Tt:le solution strengtt:l anel aj3j31ieation rate will be eleterFRineel13rior to a13131ieation baseel U!30R tt:le eonelition oftt:le surfaees. (2) Bett:llet:leFR st:lall eontrol its low volatile eoal storage 13iles by s13raying tt:leFR at least onee 13erwool< witt:! a GAOFRieal aust retarelant. (3) Reeorels ofall fugitive elust eontrol aetivities st:lall be FRaintaineel. At a FRiniFRuFR, reeorels st:lall eontain tt:le following inforFRation: (/\) nuFRber of FRiles anel loeation oftl=le 13aveel roaels eleaneel; (8) nuFRber of FRiles of unj3aveel roaels wl=liel=l were treateel inelueling tl=le ty13e, EJUantity, anel elilution ratio of elust retarelant usee!; (G) tl=le ty13e, EJUantity, anel elilution ratio ofelust retarelant Sj3rayeel on low volatile eoal storage 13iles. TAis inforFRation sl=lall be suFRFRarizeel into 13rogress re13orts anel subFRitteel to tl=le boarel EJUarterly. (4) Tl=lis nontraelitional fugithm elust eontrol 13rograFR ean be aeljusteel on a elaily basis as neeeleel to tal<e into aeeount j3reeeeling elay anel foreeasteel FReteorologieal eonelitions (for OltaFRj3le, rainfall anel teFRj3erature), anel visual observations oftl=le roaelways set:leeluleel to be eleaneel.

(b) Betl=llel=leFR Steel Gor13oration nontraelitional fugitive elust eontrol roaels is sl=lown as follows (Figure 1):

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA Page4 

# •

# •

•

• Indiana Register



### (a) Effective November 17, 2007, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall implement an approved fugitive particulate matter emission control plan meeting the requirements ofthis section.

(b) The following definitions apply throughout this section: (1) "As needed basis" means the frequency ofapplication necessaryto minimize visible particulate matter emissions as defined in the control plan. (2) "Fugitive particulate matter emissions" means particulate matterthat is emitted from any source by
means otherthan through a stack. (3) "Open aggregate pile" means the unenclosed storage of material consisting of, but not limited to, slag produced during the manufacture of iron and steel, sand, gravel, stone, and coal, which is finer than two hundred (200) mesh size equal to or greaterthan one percent (1%) by weight. Open aggregate material mesh size shall be determined by the "American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Test Method T27-74", or other equivalent procedures approved by the commissioner. (4) "Paved road" means any asphalt or concrete surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way: (A) designed or used for vehiculartraffic; and (B) located on the property of, or owned by, an individual or company. (5) "Potential emissions" means fugitive particulate matter emissions calculated afterthe application of air pollution control: (A) measures; or (B) equipment. (6) "Unpaved roads" means any surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way, otherthan a paved road as defined in subdivision (4), that is: (A) designed or used for vehicular traffic; and (B) located on the property of, or owned by, an individual or company.

(c) ISG Burns Harbor LLC's fugitive particulate matter emission control plan shall be in writing and shall include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) The name and address ofthe owner or operator responsible for the execution ofthe control plan. (2) Identification ofall:

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA Page 5Indiana Register (A) processes; (B) operations; and (C) areas; • that have the potential to emit fugitive particulate matter. (3) A map ofthe source showing the following:

(A) Aggregate pile areas. (B) Access areas around the aggregate piles. (C) Unpaved roads. (D) Paved roads. (E) Parking lots. (F) The location of conveyors and transfer points. (G) Other potential sources offugitive particulate matter. (4) The number and types ofvehicular activity occurring on the following:

(A) Paved roads. (B) Unpaved roads. (C) Parking lots. (5) The type and quantity of material handled. (6) The equipment used to maintain aggregate piles. (7) A description ofthe measures to be implemented to control fugitive particulate matter emissions resulting from emission points identified in subdivision (3). (8) A specification ofthe dust suppressant material, such as oil or chemical, including the estimated frequency of application, rates, and concentrations ofthe dust suppressant. (9) A specification ofthe particulate matter collection equipment used as a fugitive particulate matter emission control measure. (10) A schedule of compliance with the provisions ofthe control plan. The schedule shall specify the amount oftime the source requires to: (A) award any necessary contracts; and (B) commence and complete construction, installation, or modification ofthe fugitive particulate matter emission control measures. (11) Other relevant data that may be requested by the commissioner to evaluate the effectiveness of the control plan. •

(d) Records that document all control measures and activities to be implemented in accordance with the approved control plan shall be: (1) kept and maintained; (2) retained for at least five (5) years; and (3) made available upon the request ofthe commissioner.

(e) All control measures specified in this section shall be considered reasonably available control
measures (RACM). The frequency of application for all control measures shall be detailed in each control plan. No control plan shall contain control measures that violate the provisions ofstate statutes or rules. Fugitive particulate matter emissions from the emission points specified is this section shall be controlled as followed: (1) Paved roads, unpaved roads, marshaling yards, slab haul roads, slab and coil storage areas, designated beach iron dumping areas, blast furnace slag pit processing activities, iron and steel slag pot dumping areas, and parking lots as follows:

(A) Paved roads and paved parking lots by the use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Cleaning by vacuum sweeping. (ii) Flushing. (iii) An equivalent alternate measure. (B) Unpaved roads, marshaling yards, slab haul roads, slab and coil storage areas, designated beach iron dumping areas, blast furnace slag pit processing activities, iron and steel slag pot dumping areas, and unpaved parking lots by the use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Paving with a material such as asphalt or concrete. (ii) Treating with a suitable and effective commercially available petroleum based dust suppressant
or water based dust suppressant approved by the commissioner. The frequency of application shall be on an as needed basis. (iii) Spraying with water. The frequency of application shall be on an as needed basis. • (iv) Double chip and seal the road surface and maintain on an as needed basis. (v) An equivalent alternate measure.

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA Page 6

# •

•

• Indiana Register 

### (2) Open aggregate piles by the use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Cleaning the area around the perimeter ofthe aggregate piles

. (B) Applying a suitable and effective oil or other dust suppressant on an as needed basis. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (3) Outdoor conveying of aggregate material, such as, but not limited to, slag produced during the manufacture of iron and steel, sand, gravel, stone, and coal, by equipment such as belt conveyors and bucket elevators, bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Enclosing the conveyor belttotally on the top and sides as needed to minimize visible emissions and, if needed, exhausting emissions to particulate control equipment during operation ofconveyor. (B) Applying water or suitable and effective chemical dust suppressant at the feed or at intermediate points as needed to minimize visible emissions, or at both. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (4) Transferring ofaggregate material shall be controlled bythe use of one (1) or more ofthe following
measures:

(A) Minimizing the distance between the transfer points. (B) Enclosing the transfer points and, if needed, exhausting emissions to particulate control equipment during the operation ofthe transferring system. (C) Application ofwater or suitable and effective chemical dust suppressant as needed to minimize visible emissions. (D) An equivalent alternate measure. (5) Transporting aggregate material by truck, front-end loader, or similarvehicle by the use ofone (1)
or more ofthe following measures: (A) A completely enclosed vehicle. (B) Tarping the vehicle. (C) Maintaining the vehicle body in such a condition that prevents any leaks of aggregate material. (D) Spraying the materials in the vehicle with a suitable and effective dust suppressant. (E) An equivalent alternate measure. (6) Loading and unloading operations ofthe material from storage facilities, such as bins, hoppers, and silos, onto or out ofvehicles by the use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Enclosure ofthe material loading and unloading area

. (B) Total or partial enclosure ofthe facility and exhausting ofemissions to particulate collection equipment. Such equipment shall be approved by the commissioner. (C) Spraying with water or suitable and effective chemical dust suppressant as needed to minimize visible emissions. (D) Reducing the free fall distance. (E) An equivalent alternate measure. (7) Hauling and dumping solid waste (as defined in IC 13-11-2-205(a)) as follows:

(A) Hauling solid waste by the use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Wet suppression ofthe material being transported. (ii) Hauling the material enclosed or covered. (iii) Minimizing the free fall distance when unloading from the particulate collection equipment or from the process equipment onto the hauling vehicle, or from both. (iv) An equivalent alternate measure. (B) Dumping solid waste by the use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Applying water or suitable and effective chemical dust suppressant on an as needed basis to minimize visible emissions. (ii) Minimizing the free fall distance ofthe material. (iii) 

### An equivalent alternate measure. (8) Material handling operations, such as crushing, grinding, screening, and mixing, by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Wet suppression. (B) Enclosure of emission source with venting of emissions to a fabric filter. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (9) Building openings, such as doors, windows, powered or unpowered ventilators, or roof monitors, by the use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Installing a removable filter over appropriate building openings. (B) Capturing emissions within the building by the use of a proper hood system and conveying through a ductto particulate collection system approved by the commissioner. (C) An in-house operating and procedure maintenance program consisting ofthe following:

(i) Proper maintenance ofthe process equipment and particulate collection system approved the commissioner.

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA Page 7Indiana Register (ii) Substitution ofthe process equipment, material, or operating procedure that will minimize visible emissions. (D) An equivalent alternate measure.

(f) Within three (3) months of receiving a control plan, the commissioner shall notify ISG Burns Harbor LLC of: (1) the approval ofthe control plan; (2) modifications that the commissioner deems necessary to the control plan; or (3) disapproval ofthe control plan.

(g) Ifthe commissionerfinds a control plan to be incomplete, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall provide the commissioner with the required additional information.

(h) In determining ifan alternate control measure represents a RACM as specified in this section, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit and the commissioner shall consider information pertaining to factors, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) The impact on the environment in terms of any increase in water, air, or solid waste pollution emissions. (2) The energy requirements ofthe selected control measure. (3) The:

(A) capital expenditure; (B) impact on production; and (C) operating costs; to implement the selected control measure. (4) The impact ofthese costs. (5) Any adverse worker or product safety implications ofthe selected control measure.

(i) Ifa control plan is disapproved by the commissioner, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall have up to fifteen 

### (15) days from the date of receipt ofthe disapproval letterto request, in writing, a hearing on the matter

. In the event a hearing is requested: 

### (1) it shall be held in accordance with the requirements set forth in IC 

### 4-21.5; and (2) the burden of proofshall lie with ISG Burns Harbor LLC to demonstrate why the control plan is appropriate.

(j) The control plan approved by the commissioner shall become part of ISG Burns Harbor LLC's operation permit. 

### (AirPollution Control Board; 326/AC 6-6-5; filed Mar 10, 1988, 1:20p.m.: 11/R 2510; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24/R 1477)

SECTION 2. 3261AC 7-4-141S AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:



### 326 lAC 

### 7-4-14 Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations Authority: IC 

### 13-14-8; IC 

### 13-17-3-4; IC 

### 13-17-3-11; IC 

### 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 

### 13-15; IC 

### 13-17

Sec. 14. The following sources and facilities located in Porter County shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations in pounds per million Btu (lbs/MMBtu) and pounds per hour (lbs/hr), unless otherwise specified, and other requirements: (1) Bethleheffl Steel For ISG Burns Harbor Weffis;. LLC, the following:

(A) The following facilities shall burn natural gas only:

(i) BOF Shop FM Boiler. 

# •

•

(ii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Hardening and Annealing Heat Treatment Furnace. (iii) 160 inch Plate Mill Boilers No.2 and 4. (iv) Batch Annealing Furnaces (24). • (v) Continuous Heat Treat Line- Preheat, Heating and Soaking, and Reheat. (B) The following facilities shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and other requirements:

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA Page 8

# •

•

• Indiana Register

Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast FuFAaee Flare 

## M (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox


## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire**~** (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire**~** (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 0.83 0.83 

### G-:-G-7 1.0 pound per ton process material

1.73 1.96 lbs/hr 545 545

400

803 911

(AA) Ne Not more than nine (9) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four hundred eighty-two (482) pounds per hour. (BB) The remaining twenty-three (23) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace and/or natural gas with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-four (24) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace and/or natural gas with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour. 

### f>riiB (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 1 and Boiler No. 1 f*} (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 

### 2 and Boiler No. 3 1.96 299

1.96 299


## W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 1, 2, and 3 1.96 79 each 

## M (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2 1.96 441**~** (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace 1.07 88**~** (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.4 and 5 1.96 274**~** (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.6 and 7 1.96 274**~** (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnace No. 8 1.96 176**~** (xv) Power Station Boiler No. 7 0.8 520**~** (xvi) Power Station Boilers No.8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.45 2,798 

### (C) As an alternative to the sulfur dioxide emission limitations specified in clause (B), BethleheFR SteeiiSG Burns Harbor LLC shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and other requirements as follows:

Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast FurAaee Flare 

## M (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire**~** (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire**~** (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 0.75 0.75 

### G-:-G-7 1.0 pound per ton process material

1.57 1.78 lbs/hr 498 498

400

730 828

(AA) Ne Not more than six (6) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke
oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed two hundred ninety-two (292) pounds per hour. (BB) The remaining twenty-six (26) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace and/or natural gas with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-seven (27) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace and/or natural gas with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour. 

### f>riiB (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 1 and Boiler No. 1 f*} (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 2 and Boiler No. 3 

## W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 1, 2, and 3 

## M (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA 1.78

1.78

1.78 1.78 293

293

483 each 401

Page 9Indiana Register**~** (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace 

## f*iit1 (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 4 and 5 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.6 

### aAEifeF or 7, or both, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 4 and 5 shall not operate or shall burn natural gas only.**~** (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.6 and 7 If 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### &0 Furnaces No.4 

### aAEifeF or 5, or both, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 6 and 7 shall not operate or shall burn natural gas only.**~** (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnace No. 8**~** (xv) Power Station Boilers No. 7**~** (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.07 1.78

1.78

1.78 0.8 1.45 total 88 249

249

160 520 2,500 total (><viii) Beti'llei'lem Steel (xvii) ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall notify the department at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to reliance on the alternative set of limits specified in items (i) through (xvii). Beti'llei'lem Steel (xvi). ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall maintain records offuel type and operational status offacilities listed in items (xii) and (xiii) and (><iv) and shall make the records available to the department upon request.**~** (xviii) For the purposes of 326 lAC 7-2-1(c)(2), compliance shall be determined based on separate calendar month averages for the set of requirements specified in this clause and for the set of requirements specified in clause (B). (D) Coke oven gas usage at facilities other than the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to oo not more than seventy-five (75) million cubic feet per day. Total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (B)(i) through (B)(iv), (B)(vii)(M) tAFett§A (B)(vii)(BB), (B)(viii) ti'lrott§A**~** (B)(iii), (B)(vi)(AA) through (B)(vi)(BB), (B)(vii) through (B)(x), and (B)(xiii) ti'lrott§A (B)(xvii) (B)(xii) through (B)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand four hundred twenty-nine (4,429) pounds per hour. During periods in which the limits contained in clause (C) are in effect, coke oven gas usage at facilities other than the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to oo not more than seventy (70) million cubic feet per day, and total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) 

# •

through (G)(iv), (G)(·tii)(/\1\) ti'lrott§A (G)(vii)(BB), (G)(viii) tAFett§A (G)(><i), (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through • (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (G)(><iii) ti'lrott§A (G)(><Vii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand six hundred thirty (4,630) pounds per hour. (E) Beti'llei'lem SteeiiSG Burns Harbor LLC shall achieve compliance with the requirements specified in clause (B) or (C) prior to December 31, 1988. Thereafter, Beti'llei'lem SteeiiSG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a report to the department within thirty (30) days following the end of each calendar quarter containing the following information:

(i) Records ofthe total coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, fuel oil, and natural gas usage for each day at each facility listed in clauses (B) ti'lrott§A and (C). (ii) Records ofthe:

(AA) average sulfur content and heating value as determined per the procedures specified in clause (F) for each fuel type used during the calendar quarter; and 

### ef.-tl::te (BB) maximum number of slab mill soaking pits burning coke oven gas at any given time during each day. (iii) The calculated sulfur dioxide emission rate in the applicable emission units (pounds per hour, pounds per million Btu, and/or pounds per ton) for each facility for each day and the average sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (G)(iv), (G)(vii)(/V\) ti'lrott§A (G)(•f'ii)(BB), (G)(viii) tAFOI:J§A (G)(><i), (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (G)(><iii) tAFOI:JQA (G)(><vii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) for each day in pounds per hour during the calendar quarter. (F) Beti'llei'lem Steel ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a sampling and analysis protocol to the department by December 31, 1988. The protocol shall:

(i) contain a description of planned procedures for:

(AA) sampling of sulfur-bearing fuels and materials; 

### feF (BB) analysis ofthe sulfur content; and 

### feF (CC) any planned direct measurement ofsulfur dioxide emissions vented to the atmosphere; Ti'le protocol sAaHand (ii) specify the frequency of sampling, analysis, and/or measurement for each:

(AA) fuel and material; and for eaeA (BB) facility. The department shall incorporate the protocol into the source's operation permit per procedures specified in • 326 lAC 2. The department may revise the protocol as necessary to establish acceptable sampling, analysis, and/or measurements procedures and frequency. The department may also require that a source

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA Page 10

# •

•

• Indiana Register conduct a stack test at any facility listed in this subdivision within thirty (30) days ofwritten notification by the department. (2) For 

### Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Station, the following: 

### Facility Description (A) Boilers 7 and 8 Boilers 7 and 8 shall be fired with coal, fuel oil, or natural gas. (B) Gas Turbine 10 (3) For 

### Midwest Steel, the following: 

### Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 6.0 each

natural gas only

Facility Description Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu Babcock and Wilcox Boiler 1 and Erie City Boilers No. 1, 2, and 3 1.33 each Only two (2) offour (4) boilers may burn fuel oil with a sulfur dioxide emission rate greater than three-tenths (0.3) pounds per million Btu at the same time. Midwest Steel shall maintain records offuel type for each boiler for each hour. The records offuel type shall be made available to the department upon request. (4) For

### Air Products and Chemical, the following: 

### Facility Description Emission Limitations All boilers and the No. 3 Hydrogen Reformer natural gas only (Air Pollution Control Board; 3261AC 7-4-14; filedAug 28, 1990, 4:50p.m.: 141R 78; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 241R 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35p.m.: 261R 1568)



### Notice of Public Hearing

Posted: 08/08/2007by Legislative Services Agency 

### An html version ofthis document.

Date: Dec 02,2009 1:14:47PM EST DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA Page 11