alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 939.779 Surface mining permit applications—minimum requirements for information on environmental resources.

Part 779 of this chapter, *Surface Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Information on Environmental Resources,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
#### § 1657.4 Consideration of claims.

An overseas registrant's claim shall be determined by a local board (or its supporting area office) or appeal board as may be established in accord with this part or, upon the request of the registrant filed no later than the filing of his claim for reclassification, by the board having geographic jurisdiction over his permanent address within the United States last reported by him to the Selective Service System prior to issuance of his induction order.
Exhibit 23.1


The Board of Directors
ImClone Systems Incorporated:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-95860, 333-07339, 333-21417 and 333-22341 on Form S-3 and Nos.
333-10275 and 33-95894 on Form S-8) of ImClone Systems Incorporated of our
report dated February 18, 1997, relating to the balance sheets of ImClone
Systems Incorporated as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ImClone Systems Incorporated.

     Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, in 1996.



                                                /s/KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
                                                ------------------------
                                                   KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



New York, New York
March 27, 1997
#### In the Matter of Wolf Weinreb et al., Respondents, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Appellant, and Alexander H. Kosloff, as Chairman of the Tenants’ Committee, Intervenor-Appellant.

Order, entered on January 15, 1963, annulling the Administrator’s order and reinstating a rent increase, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the petitioners-respondents, on the authority of *Matter of East 19th Street*v. *Gabel*(19 A D 2d 590). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER II—QUARTERS
#### In the Matter of Leona M. Cairns, Petitioner, against New York State Employees’ Retirement System, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Comptroller of the State of New York as head of the New York State Employees’ Retirement System. In June, 1957 the petitioner’s husband, now deceased, made application to the State Comptroller for accidental disability retirement benefits pursuant to the State Retirement and Social Security Law. The decedent had been a policeman employed by the Village of Catskill and had been a member of the State Retirement System. He suffered an injury in the course of employment on October 29, 1953, over three years before his application for accidental retirement benefits. He was permanently and totally disabled when he applied for benefits; the issue in this case is whether this disability resulted from the 1953 accident. The Comptroller by initial determination disapproved the application ; and on application of the present petitioner a rehearing and redetermination were had as a result of which the application was again disapproved. Whether the decedent’s disability in 1957 was due to the accident of 1953 is a medical question and the Comptroller had proof in both directions. It is clear that from 1953, at least, decedent’s condition was diagnosed as due to carcinoma; that he was suffering from this disease as a direct cause of his disability in June, 1957 and that this was the cause of his death on September 13, 1957 which occurred while the application for disability benefits was pending before the Comptroller. There is clear and unequivocal medical evidence in the record to the effect the accident of 1953 had no relation to the cancer and its disabling *895consequences. Although it is argued by petitioner that the Comptroller’s acceptance of this proof results in a decision that is *“*against the weight of evidence ” our power of review does not admit of annulment of the determination because we would, on our view of the evidence, make a finding the other way. If the Comptroller had before him substantial evidence to sustain his ruling, we feel required to confirm; and the medical opinion in this record constitutes substantial evidence. Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
# THELI'ITORNEYGICNERAI. OFTEXAS **Auwrmr. TBCXAS**  **78711**

May 27, 1975 The Honorable Joe Wyatt, Jr. Chairman Legislative Property Tax Committee 105 West Riverside Drive Austin, Texas 78704 Opinion No. H- 617 Re: Time ofexpiration ofthe appropriation tothe Legislative Property Tax Committee. Dear Chairman Wyatt:

You have asked our opinion onthe duration ofanappropriation to the Legislative Property Tax Committee. Acts 1973, ch. 223, p. 519[codified as V.T. C.S., art. 7100, $41 provides inpart: **sec. 1.**  **. .**  **.**All moneys deposited inthis special fund and any unexpended balance remaining in the fund onJune 1, 1973, shall be and the same are hereby appropriated tothe use ofthe Property Tax Committee in carrying out the tasks assigned under this Act, the funds thus appropriated to be disbursed upon written orders ofthe Committee, with anannual accounting by the Committee to be filed wi,th the State Auditor. This appropriation is made for atwo-year period beginning June 1, 1973.
sec. 2. This Act takes effect June 1, 1973. However, the conference committee report did not receive arecord vote in the House ofRepresentatives, and it is asserted that the Act did not become effective until Augu,st 27, 1973, which is ninety days after adjournment ofthe Legislature. We need not decide whether the bill became effective on June 1, 1973, or onAugust 27, 1973, for in our view the effective date ofthe Act does not control the date onwhich this appropriation expires.

p. 2732The Honorable Joe Wyatt, Jr. -Page 2 (H-617)

The Act appropriates funds for atwo year period beginning June 1, 1973. That period expires May 31, 1975. Even though the funds may not have become available until August 27, 1973, the failure ofthe House of Representatives tovote to give early effect to the bill cannot be construed to extend the appropriation toaperiod ending two years after the effective date ofthe Act.

The Legislature is presumed tohave chosen the words it uses with care, and its intention must be found in the language ofthe statute. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Miller, 434 S.W. 2d670 (Tex. Sup. 1968). The language the Legislature chooses cannot be ignored. Perkins v. State, 367 S.W. 2d 140 (Tex. Sup. 1963). Accordingly, it is our opinion that the appropriation to the Legislative Property Tax Committee expires onMay 31, 1975. SUMMARY The appropriation to the Legislative Property Tax Committee expires May 31, 1975.

OHN L. HILL Attorney General ofTexas APPROVED:

First Assistant
C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee jwb

p. 2733
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 102 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 102

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 8, 2023.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House:
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Higgins of New York, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. 
Blumenauer, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Peters, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Doggett, Ms. 
Wexton, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Omar, Mr. Trone, Ms. Balint, Mr. Scott of Virginia, 
Mr. Panetta.
    Committee on Foreign Affairs: Mr. Costa, Mr. Crow.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### §13145. Civil penalties

(a) Civil Action.—The Attorney General may bring a civil action in any appropriate United States district court against any individual who violates any provision of section 13143 or 13144 of this title. The court in which such action is brought may assess against such individual a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 or the amount of compensation, if any, which the individual received for the prohibited conduct, whichever is greater.

(b) Advisory Opinions.—Any entity described in section 13142 of this title may render advisory opinions interpreting this subchapter, in writing, to individuals covered by this subchapter. Any individual to whom such an advisory opinion is rendered and any other individual covered by this subchapter who is involved in a fact situation which is indistinguishable in all material aspects, and who, after the issuance of such advisory opinion, acts in good faith in accordance with its provisions and findings shall not, as a result of such actions, be subject to any sanction under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(c), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4304.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 13145 | 5 U.S.C. App. (EGA §504) | Pub. L. 95–521, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 101–194, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1761. |

Section
aw USGS U.S. DEPARTMENT ae id INTERIOR

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1411-A
science for a changing world U.S. GEOLOGICAL SUI

Thickness and lithology of the Cutler-Maroon zone—PLATE 15

Geldon, A, 2002, Geology of Palenzic rx inthe Upper Colorad River Bosin in
Arizona, Coldrado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, excluding the San Juan Basin

RANCHESTER :
LIMESTONE MEMBER OF 110

AMSDEN FORMATION
me 0

EXPLANATION

ose Area where Cutler-Maroon zone is missing because of erosion or non-
deposition or is thrust under Precambrian rocks

. Borehole with lithologic log used to prepare map

+ Measured surface stratigraphic section used to prepare map

Stratigraphic Nomenclature and Thickness

ee] Area where Cutler-Maroon zone crops out (generalized)

—100— Line of equal thickness—Interval, in feet, is variable

=

Approximate boundary between component geologic units
41
& & R— R' Location of stratigraphic cross section shown in figures 34 and 37
2 :
af aP
8 8
Lithology

(a) Sandstone and conglomerate with subordinate shale and less than 10
percent limestone and dolomite layers
MORGAN

FORMATION

a a a Shale with subordinate sandstone and less than 20 percent limestone and
< ; a - £A0° a ay 7 500) dolomite layers; may contain 1-16 percent gypsum and anhydrite
UPPER MEMBER OF as y aa : —
HERMOSA FORMATION i L q :
AND ELEPHANT Bs
CANYON FORMATION"

Shale with less than 10 percent, each, sandstone and carbonate layers

fa Shale with subordinate carbonate layers and less than 10 percent
sandstone layers

UPPER MEMBER OF a
"NELEPHANT CANYON Limestone and dolomite with subordinate shale and less than 20 percent
ELEPHANT CANYON
FORMATION, CEDAR,
MESA SANDSTONE,
AND ORGAN ROCK SHALE}

sandstone layers

UPPER
MEMBER OF
HERMOSA
FORMATION,
HALGAITO SHALE," ; E
CEDAR MESA ! E -& < 2Bhie Meda-
SANDSTONE, D 7 Reservoif 17
AND ORGAN : p94
ROCK SHALE

es Limestone and dolomite with subordinate shale, less than 20 percent
sandstone, and 5-20 percent anhydrite/gypsum layers

Limestone, dolomite, sandstone, and shale

—25— Line of equal percent sandstone and conglomerate—In some areas,
location is approximate because of sparse control. Interval is 25 percent

———__ Approximate boundary between lithofacies

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO

RIVER BASIN
er
Springs gy
on, 37° 37°

Navajo e
Reservoir

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO
RIVER BASIN

R FORMATION
MEMBER-OF HERMOSA
ON; RHEQ FORMATION, (

Navajo

Reservoir we
I.

109"

a) mingtof aL GAITO SHALE, GEBAR MESA
SANDSTONE, AND ORGA
ROCK SHAUL

AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY } AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY

1
WESCOGAME FORMATION, = maa 107"
ESPLANADE SANDSTONE, > .

NO DATA
AND HERMIT SHALE

09° . oa
OF BAARS (1962) = .

T T T T
25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS

108°
1:2,000,000 1:2,000,000
0 25 50 75 100 MILES Q 25 GS va 700 MILES
1 i i 1 J 1
t T T T T
0 25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS 0

STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE AND THICKNESS LITHOLOGY

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. base map, 1:2,500,000

STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE, THICKNESS, AND LITHOLOGY OF THE CUTLER-MAROON ZONE OF THE CANYONLANDS AQUIFER IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN AND VICINITY
IN ARIZONA, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, UTAH, AND WYOMING
By
Arthur L. Geldon

rovavats }
### SUBCHAPTER II—REMOVAL, SUSPENSION FOR MORE THAN 14 DAYS, REDUCTION IN GRADE OR PAY, OR FURLOUGH FOR 30 DAYS OR LESS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–454, title II, §204(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1135, substituted "REMOVAL, SUSPENSION FOR MORE THAN 14 DAYS, REDUCTION IN GRADE OR PAY, OR FURLOUGH FOR 30 DAYS OR LESS" for "PREFERENCE ELIGIBLES" in subchapter heading.
§ 937.772 Requirements for coal exploration. ( a ) Part 772 of this chapter, *Requirements for Coal Exploration,* shall apply to any person who conducts or seeks to conduct coal exploration operations.
( b ) The Office shall make every effort to act on an exploration application within 60 days of receipt or such longer time as may be reasonable under the circumstances. If additional time is needed, OSMRE shall notify the applicant that the application is being reviewed, but more time is necessary to complete such review, setting forth the reasons and the additional time that is needed.
( c ) Where coal exploration is to occur on State lands or the minerals to be explored are owned by the State, a mineral lease issued by the Oregon Division of Lands authorizing the coal exploration is required to be filed with the permit application.
[52 FR 13812, Apr. 24, 1987]
1

The HONORABLE LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge, United States District

Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1973

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Northern District of Iowa.

*

Thomas Dean Appleby, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 7, 2010

Filed: September 9, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Dean Appleby pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine base, in violation

of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). The district court1

 determined that Appleby

was entitled to safety-valve relief from the statutory minimum sentence, see 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(f); explained the sentencing factors it had considered; and imposed a belowGuidelines-range sentence of 33 months in prison. On appeal, Appleby’s counsel has

moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

maintaining that the sentence imposed was unreasonable because it was longer than
-2-

necessary to achieve the goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and because the disparity

between sentences for cocaine base and powder cocaine offenses was inadequately

considered. 

Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the sentence imposed

was not an abuse of the district court’s substantial sentencing discretion. See United

States v. Stults, 575 F.3d 834, 849 (8th Cir. 2009); United States v. Feemster, 572

F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). Finding no nonfrivolous issue for appeal, see

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw conditioned on counsel informing Appleby about the procedures

for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for a writ of certiorari. 

______________________________
### **CHAPTER 37—INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EXCHANGE PROGRAM**

Sec.
3701.
Definitions.
3702.
General provisions.
3703.
Assignment of employees to private sector organizations.
3704.
Assignment of employees from private sector organizations.
3705.
Application to Office of the Chief Technology Officer of the District of Columbia.
3706.
Reporting requirement.
3707.
Regulations.
### §50134. Use of excess intercontinental ballistic missiles

(a) In General.—The Federal Government shall not—

(1) convert any missile described in subsection (c) to a space transportation vehicle configuration; or

(2) transfer ownership of any such missile to another person, except as provided in subsection (b).

(b) Authorized Federal Uses.—

(1) In general.—A missile described in subsection (c) may be converted for use as a space transportation vehicle by the Federal Government if, except as provided in paragraph (2) and at least 30 days before such conversion, the agency seeking to use the missile as a space transportation vehicle transmits to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives, and to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, a certification that the use of such missile—

(A) would result in cost savings to the Federal Government when compared to the cost of acquiring space transportation services from United States commercial providers;

(B) meets all mission requirements of the agency, including performance, schedule, and risk requirements;

(C) is consistent with international obligations of the United States; and

(D) is approved by the Secretary of Defense or the designee of the Secretary of Defense.

(2) Exception to requirement that certification be transmitted 30 days before conversion.—The requirement under paragraph (1) that the certification described in that paragraph must be transmitted at least 30 days before conversion of the missile shall not apply if the Secretary of Defense determines that compliance with that requirement would be inconsistent with meeting immediate national security requirements.

(c) Missiles Referred to.—The missiles referred to in this section are missiles owned by the United States that—

(1) were formerly used by the Department of Defense for national defense purposes as intercontinental ballistic missiles; and

(2) have been declared excess to United States national defense needs and are in compliance with international obligations of the United States.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3400.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50134 | 42 U.S.C. 14734. | Pub. L. 105–303, title II, §205, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2857; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1067(21), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 775. |

Section

In subsection (b)(1), in the matter before subparagraph (A), the words "Committee on Science and Technology" are substituted for "Committee on Science" on authority of Rule X(1)(o) of the Rules of the House of Representatives, adopted by House Resolution No. 6 (110th Congress, January 5, 2007).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
### §305501. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) Building arts.—The term "building arts" includes all practical and scholarly aspects of prehistoric, historic, and contemporary architecture, archeology, construction, building technology and skills, landscape architecture, preservation and conservation, building and construction, engineering, urban and community design and renewal, city and regional planning, and related professions, skills, trades, and crafts.

(2) Committee.—The term "Committee" means the Committee for a National Museum of the Building Arts, Incorporated, a nonprofit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the District of Columbia, or its successor.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3223.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 305501 | 16 U.S.C. 470w–5(f). | Pub. L. 89–665, title III, §306(f), as added Pub. L. 96–515, title V, §501, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3003. |

Section
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Green parks plan.
 
2012| 2016
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.170:
Item Number:0648-A-44 (online)
CGP System Number:001014198
 
 
September 15, 2017**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DRAVO
CORPORATION'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1749
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    20985
<ALLOWANCES>                                       589
<INVENTORY>                                      17988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 41526
<PP&E>                                          260776
<DEPRECIATION>                                  119151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  243230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            37439
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         15100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            20000
<PREFERRED>                                         19
<OTHER-SE>                                       86191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    243230
<SALES>                                         121025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                121025
<CGS>                                            90680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    90680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5095
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9678
<INCOME-TAX>                                       537
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               9141
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      9141
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>