alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 778.14 Providing violation information. ( a ) You, the applicant, must state, in your permit application, whether you, your operator, or any subsidiary, affiliate, or entity which you or your operator own or control or which is under common control with you or your operator, has— ( 1 ) Had a Federal or State permit for surface coal mining operations suspended or revoked during the five-year period preceding the date of submission of the application; or
( 2 ) Forfeited a performance bond or similar security deposited in lieu of bond in connection with surface coal mining and reclamation operations during the five-year period preceding the date of submission of the application.
( b ) For each suspension, revocation, or forfeiture identified under paragraph (a), you must provide a brief explanation of the facts involved, including the— ( 1 ) Permit number.
( 2 ) Date of suspension, revocation, or forfeiture, and, when applicable, the amount of bond or similar security forfeited.
( 3 ) Regulatory authority that suspended or revoked the permit or forfeited the bond and the stated reasons for the action.
( 4 ) Current status of the permit, bond, or similar security involved.
( 5 ) Date, location, type, and current status of any administrative or judicial proceedings concerning the suspension, revocation, or forfeiture.
( c ) A list of all violation notices you or your operator received for any surface coal mining and reclamation operation during the three-year period preceding the date of submission of the application. In addition you must submit a list of all unabated or uncorrected violation notices incurred in connection with any surface coal mining and reclamation operation that you or your operator own or control on that date. For each violation notice reported, you must include the following information, when applicable— ( 1 ) The permit number and associated MSHA number.
( 2 ) The issue date, identification number, and current status of the violation notice.
( 3 ) The name of the person to whom the violation notice was issued,
( 4 ) The name of the regulatory authority or agency that issued the violation notice.
( 5 ) A brief description of the violation alleged in the notice.
( 6 ) The date, location, type, and current status of any administrative or judicial proceedings concerning the violation notice.
( 7 ) If the abatement period for a violation in a notice of violation issued under § 843.12 of this chapter, or its State regulatory program equivalent, has not expired, certification that the violation is being abated or corrected to the satisfaction of the agency with jurisdiction over the violation.
( 8 ) For all violations not covered by paragraph (c)(7) of this section, the actions taken to abate or correct the violation.
[65 FR 79669, Dec. 19, 2000]
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Daniel T. Meisenheimer,  Chief Executive Officer and President of United
States Basketball League,  Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of United States Basketball League,  Inc., as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and the  information  contained in such report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of United
States Basketball League, Inc. for the periods presented.

                                      /s/Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Name:  Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
                                      Date:  June 13, 2007



     I,  Richard C.  Meisenheimer,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of United  States
Basketball League,  Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of United States  Basketball  League,  Inc., as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 and the  information  contained  in such  report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of United
States Basketball League, Inc. for the periods presented.

                                      /s/Richard C. Meisenheimer
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Name: Richard C. Meisenheimer
                                      Date: June 13, 2007
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 993 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that bonds used 

to finance professional stadiums are not treated as tax-exempt bonds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure 

that bonds used to finance professional stadiums are 

not treated as tax-exempt bonds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Tax Subsidies for 

5 Stadiums Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NO TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FOR PROFESSIONAL STA7 DIUMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 103(b) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following new paragraph: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 993 IH

1 ‘‘(4) PROFESSIONAL STADIUM BOND.—Any pro2 fessional stadium bond.’’. 

3 (b) PROFESSIONAL STADIUM BOND DEFINED.—Sec4 tion 103(c) of such Code is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(3) PROFESSIONAL STADIUM BOND.—The 

7 term ‘professional stadium bond’ means any bond 

8 issued as part of an issue any proceeds of which are 

9 used to finance or refinance capital expenditures al10 locable to a facility (or appurtenant real property) 

11 which, during at least 5 days during any calendar 

12 year, is used as a stadium or arena for professional 

13 sports exhibitions, games, or training.’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

16 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,055,297
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,719,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,779,524)
<INVENTORY>                                    4,956,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               24,597,271
<PP&E>                                         70,879,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (29,080,376)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 83,701,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,156,407
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       449,894
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   83,701,976
<SALES>                                        48,430,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               48,430,237
<CGS>                                          39,254,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  39,254,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,994,947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,624,722
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                555,592
<INCOME-TAX>                                   127,871
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            427,721
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   427,721
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.09
        


</TABLE>
### §51101. Definitions

In this chapter—

(1) the definitions in section 50501 of this title apply.

(2) "commercial space transportation infrastructure development" includes—

(A) construction, improvement, design, and engineering of space transportation infrastructure in the United States; and

(B) technical studies to define how new or enhanced space transportation infrastructure can best meet the needs of the United States commercial space transportation industry.

(3) "project" means a project (or separate projects submitted together) to carry out commercial space transportation infrastructure development, including the combined submission of all projects to be undertaken at a particular site in a fiscal year.

(4) "project grant" means a grant of an amount by the Secretary of Transportation to a sponsor for one or more projects.

(5) "public agency" means a State or an agency of a State, a political subdivision of a State, or a tax-supported organization.

(6) "sponsor" means a public agency that, individually or jointly with one or more other public agencies, submits to the Secretary under this chapter an application for a project grant.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1343, §70301 of title 49; renumbered §70301 then §51101 of title 51 and amended Pub. L. 111–314, §4(d)(2), (4)(A), (6)(A), Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3440–3442.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70301 | 15:5804(a). | Nov. 4, 1992, Pub. L. 102–588, §505(a), 106 Stat. 5124. |

Section

Clause (1) is added to incorporate the definitions in 15:5802.

In clause (2), the word "includes" is substituted for "may include" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

In clause (5), the words "municipality or other" are omitted for consistency.

The text of 15:5804(5) is omitted as unnecessary because the complete name of the Secretary of Transportation is used the first time the term appears in a section.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–314, §4(d)(2), (4)(A), successively renumbered section 70301 of title 49 and section 70301 of this title as this section.

Par. (1). Pub. L. 111–314, §4(d)(6)(A), substituted "section 50501 of this title" for "section 502 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1993 (15 U.S.C. 5802)".
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Intelligent Propulsion Control Architecture to Enable More Autonomous Vehicle OperationThis paper describes an intelligent propulsion control architecture that coordinates with the flight control to reduce the amount of pilot intervention required to operate the vehicle. Objectives of the architecture include the ability to: automatically recognize the aircraft operating state and flight phase; configure engine control to optimize performance with knowledge of engine condition and capability; enhance aircraft performance by coordinating propulsion control with flight control; and recognize off-nominal propulsion situations and to respond to them autonomously. The hierarchical intelligent propulsion system control can be decomposed into a propulsion system level and an individual engine level. The architecture is designed to be flexible to accommodate evolving requirements, adapt to technology improvements, and maintain safety.Document ID20180001851Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLitt, Jonathan S.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Sowers, T. Shane*(Vantage Partners, LLC Cleveland, OH, United States)*Simon, Donald L.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Owen, A. Karl*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Rinehart, Aidan W.*(Vantage Partners, LLC Cleveland, OH, United States)*Chicatelli, Amy K.*(Vantage Partners, LLC Cleveland, OH, United States)*Acheson, Michael J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Hueschen, Richard M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Spiers, Christopher W.*(Universities Space Research Association Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 9, 2018Publication DateMarch 1, 2018Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN52719E-19476NASA/TM-2018-219765AIAA Paper 2018-1837Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA SciTech ForumLocation: Kissimmee, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 8, 2018End Date: January 12, 2018Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.02.11CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01BCONTRACT_GRANT: NNL12AA09CCONTRACT_GRANT: NNX13AJ40ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsautonomyAvailable DownloadsNameType20180001851.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9887 

To assist Indian Tribes in protecting Native American seeds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2024 

Mrs. TORRES of California (for herself and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in 

addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To assist Indian Tribes in protecting Native American seeds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Native American Seeds 

5 Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) INDIAN TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Indian Tribe’’ 

9 has the meaning given the term in section 4 of the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9887 IH

1 Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance 

2 Act (25 U.S.C. 5304). 

3 (2) NATIVE AMERICAN SEED.—The term ‘‘Na4 tive American seed’’ means a seed of traditional or 

5 cultural significance to an Indian Tribe. 

6 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

7 the Secretary of the Interior. 

8 SEC. 3. PROTECTION OF NATIVE AMERICAN SEEDS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in con11 sultation with Indian Tribes, shall establish a program 

12 within the Department of the Interior to— 

13 (1) determine which seeds are Native American 

14 seeds; and 

15 (2) support— 

16 (A) efforts of Indian Tribes to protect Na17 tive American seeds; 

18 (B) Native American seed banks and re19 lated facilities; and 

20 (C) traditional agriculture systems of In21 dian Tribes that provide for the nurturing and 

22 harvesting of Native American seeds. 

23 (b) PROTECTION OF INFORMATION.—Notwith24 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary shall 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9887 IH

1 not disclose or cause to be disclosed any information that 

2 is— 

3 (1) provided to the Secretary by an Indian 

4 Tribe for the purposes of this Act; and 

5 (2) identified by the Indian Tribe as culturally 

6 sensitive, proprietary, or otherwise confidential. 

7 SEC. 4. JUDICIAL REVIEW. 

8 Notwithstanding section 706 of title 5, United States 

9 Code, a court shall defer to the Secretary’s reasonable in10 terpretation of any ambiguous provision of this Act. 

11 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

12 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

13 as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit No. 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kevin W. Hadlock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR CORPORATION   February 28, 2011 /s/Kevin W. Hadlock Kevin W. Hadlock Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Edwin Ramirez et al., Respondents, v 101465 Realty, Inc., Appellant, and V & F Greenwich Village, Inc., Doing *237Business as Famous Ray’s Pizza, Respondent.

[831 NYS2d 704]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered October 24, 2006, which denied defendant 101465 Realty, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The relevant leases reserve to defendant landlord 101465 Realty, Inc. the right to reenter the demised premises for the purpose of inspection and repair. That reservation together with the circumstance that the summary judgment movant’s evidence did not disprove plaintiffs allegation that the premises stairwell where he fell had significant structural or design defects in violation of the New York City Building Code, dictated the motion’s denial *(see Kraus v Caliche Realty Estates,*289 AD2d 9 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and Buckley, JJ.
#### § 942.761 Areas designated unsuitable for surface coal mining by act of Congress.

Part 761 of this chapter, *Areas Designated by Act of Congress,* shall apply to surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
#### § 822.10 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in § 822.13 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3507 and assigned clearance number 1029-0049. The information is being collected to meet the requirements of sections 510(b)(5) and 515(b)(10)(F) of the Act which provide the information collection requirements and performance standards for alluvial valley floors. This information will be used to enable the regulatory authority to assess the impact of the proposed operation during the permanent regulatory program. The obligation to respond is mandatory.
Editorial Note on Part 773
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54938, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 773 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93323-93325, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 773.12 Permit eligibility determination. Based on the reviews required under §§ 773.9 through 773.11 of this part, we, the regulatory authority, will determine whether you, the applicant, are eligible for a permit under section 510(c) of the Act. ( a ) Except as provided in §§ 773.13 and 773.14 of this part, you are not eligible for a permit if we find that any surface coal mining operation that— ( 1 ) You directly own or control has an unabated or uncorrected violation; or
( 2 ) You or your operator indirectly control has an unabated or uncorrected violation and your control was established or the violation was cited after November 2, 1988.
( b ) We will not issue you a permit if you or your operator are permanently ineligible to receive a permit under § 774.11(c) of this subchapter.
( c ) After we approve your permit under § 773.15 of this part, we will not issue the permit until you comply with the information update and certification requirement of § 778.9(d) of this subchapter. After you complete that requirement, we will again request a compliance history report from AVS to determine if there are any unabated or uncorrected violations which affect your permit eligibility under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. We will request this report no more than five business days before permit issuance under § 773.19 of this part.
( d ) If you are ineligible for a permit under this section, we will send you written notification of our decision. The notice will tell you why you are ineligible and include notice of your appeal rights under part 775 of this subchapter and 43 CFR 4.1360 through 4.1369.
[65 FR 79663, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 68029, Dec. 3, 2007]
#### In the Matter of Augustin Saldana, Respondent, v State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 96]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered on or about July 20, 2006, which granted petitioner’s motion to vacate an arbitration award, directed that a new *417arbitration be held before a different arbitrator, and denied respondent’s cross motion to confirm the award, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion denied and cross motion granted.

The arbitrator’s determination, that petitioner did not sustain “serious injury” as that term is defined in Insurance Law § 5102 (d), was rational and supported by evidence in the record *(see Matter of Travelers Ins. Co. v Job,*239 AD2d 289, 291 [1997]).

Petitioner failed adequately to support his contention that the award should be vacated on the ground of arbitral partiality (CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [ii]). His assertion that the arbitrator awarded him nothing because he complained to the American Arbitration Association respecting the arbitrator’s delay in rendering his determination rests on a “mere inference” of partiality insufficient to warrant disturbance of the award *(Rose v Lowrey & Co.,*181 AD2d 418, 419 [1992]). There is nothing in the record to indicate that the arbitrator received the complaints directly or was influenced by them *(cf. Matter of Fischer [Queens Tel. Secretary],*106 AD2d 314 [1984]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Sweeny, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
#### § 937.784 Underground mining permit applications—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan.

Part 784 of this chapter, *Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct underground mining.