alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITE D STATE S O FAMERIC A DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C

TRAVE L GROUP , INC. , D/B/ A REPUBLI C AI RTRAVE L AN D SCO T SPENCE R AIRLIF T GROUP , INC
. AN D RICHAR D BERNAR D Unauthorize dAi r

Transportation , Unfai r an dDeceptiv e Practice s an dUnfai r

Metliod s o f

Competition , an d Violation s o f

Publi c Charte r

Rule s EXPRES S ON E INTERNATIONAL , INC
. Unfai r an dDeceptiv e Practice s an dUnfai r Method s o f Competition , an dViolation s o f Publi c Charte r

Rule s Enforcemen t

Proceedin g DOT-OST-1995-27 2
formerl y Docke t 4923 3

STATU S REPOR T
Th e Offic e of

th e Assistan t

Genera l Counse l for

Aviatio n Enforcemen t

an d Proceeding s ("Enforcemen t Office") , pursuan t

t o You r Honor' s Marc h 22 , 2006 , Orde r stayin g thi s proceeding , file s thi s report detailin g th e curren t

statu s o f thi s proceedin g an d settlemen t negotiations
. Th e Departmen t

ha s no t rule do n th e outstandin g motion s file db y Respondent s
an doppose db y th e Enforcemen t Offic e in Ascen dAviatio n Group , Docke t OST-2004

- 17486
.Ther e hav e bee n n o further settlemen t

discussions
. Date : Februar y 26 , 2010
. Respectfull y submitted ,
Samue l Podberesky Assistan t Genera l Counse l for Aviatio n Enforcemen t

an dProceeding s Dayto n Lehman , Jr
. Deput y Assistan t

Genera l Counse l for Aviatio n Enforcemen t

an dProceeding s

Willia mJ
. Wagne , Senio r Trial Attorne y Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Enforcemen t

an dProceeding s 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Roo m96-42 9 Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-934 2 FAX : 202-366-715 2

### w

Docke t No
. DOT-GST-1995-27 2 I hereb y certif

y that o n thi s 26th day of

February , 2010 , atru e an dcorrec t cop y of th e foregoin g Statu s Report

was serve di n th e followin g manne r t o th e following : Origina l U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Operations , M-3 0 Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloo r Roo mW12-14 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 B y Persona l Servic e Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

of Transportatio n Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloo r Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 TEL : (202 ) 366-214 2 FAX : (202 ) 366-753 6 B y Firs t Clas s Mai l Ascen dAviatio n Group , LL C Ascen dAviatio n Marketin g an dSales , LL C KC P Leasin g an dServices , LL C Sco t Spence r C/O Georg e Spence r 2 4 Eto n Court Bedminster , NJ 0792 1 

# laLS ^
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9919 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9919

 To amend title 39 of the United States Code to require the Postmaster 
      General to be appointed by the President, subject to Senate 
                 confirmation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2024

   Mr. Golden of Maine (for himself and Mr. Pfluger) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39 of the United States Code to require the Postmaster 
      General to be appointed by the President, subject to Senate 
                 confirmation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Postmaster General Reform Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Board of Governors.--Section 202(c) of title 39, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c)(1) The Postmaster General shall be a voting member of the 
Board.
    ``(2) The pay and term of service of the Postmaster General shall 
be fixed by the Governors.''.
    (b) Postmaster General.--Section 203 of title 39, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The chief'' and inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--The chief'';
            (2) in subsection (a), as so designated by paragraph (1), 
        by striking ``appointed under section 202(c) of this title'' 
        and inserting ``, who shall be appointed by the President, by 
        and with the advice and consent of the Senate''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Terms and Term Limits.--The Postmaster General shall serve 
for a term of 5 years, which may be renewed, with the consent of the 
Senate, for a single additional 5-year term.''.
    (c) Procedures of the Board of Governors.--Section 205(c)(1) of 
title 39, United States Code, is amended by striking ``in the 
appointment or removal of the Postmaster General, and''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect beginning with the first appointment of an individual to serve 
as the Postmaster General on or after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Constar International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Walter S. Sobon, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ WALTER S. SOBON                                 
|Walter S. Sobon                                     
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2009
# C_2023282EN.01000201.xml

| 11.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11180 – PRADA / ZEGNA / FEDELI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 282/02)

On 7 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in Italian language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11180. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11180. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4441

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JERRIS LEON MARKHAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (1:05-cr-00204-JAB)

Submitted: September 25, 2006 Decided: October 26, 2006

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William C. Ingram,

Jr., First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States

Attorney, Michael A. DeFranco, Assistant United States Attorney,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jerris Leon Markham pled guilty to one count of

possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 922(g)(1), 924 (2000). Markham was sentenced to thirty-two

months’ imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

Markham contends that his predicate state conviction did

not satisfy § 922(g)(1) as a matter of law. He reasons that, under

North Carolina law, his maximum sentence was twelve months because

no aggravating factors were admitted to or found by a jury beyond

a reasonable doubt. See North Carolina v. Allen, 615 S.E.2d 256,

265 (N.C. 2005) (holding, after Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296

(2004), statutory maximum is the maximum that a particular

defendant can face in light of his criminal history and the facts

found by a jury or admitted by defendant). However, Markham

concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Harp,

406 F.3d 242, 246-47 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 297

(2005), which holds that United States v. Jones, 195 F.3d 205 (4th

Cir. 1999), is still viable after Blakely and United States v.

Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and reaffirms that a prior North

Carolina conviction satisfies § 922(g)(1) if any defendant charged

with that crime could receive a sentence in excess of one year.

Thus, because it is undisputed that a sentence of over twelve

months could be imposed on a defendant convicted of felony

possession of a stolen automobile in North Carolina, Markham’s
- 3 -

prior conviction was properly considered a predicate felony under

§ 922(g)(1).

Accordingly, we affirm Markham’s conviction and sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with Quarterly Report of Comtech Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jeffrey Kang, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |        |  |                        
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jeffrey Kang       
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey Kang           
|                   |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer



29
<PAGE 1>
E-1
                                                    EXHIBIT 11

                 NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                          AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 ----------------------------------
             COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

A.  Primary:  See the Statement of Income of this Form 10-Q.

B.  Full Dilution:  Net income per common share assuming full
    dilution is computed by assuming that all options and warrants
    which are exercisable below market prices are exercised and the
    proceeds applied to reduce common stock outstanding.  The
    computations assume that convertible preferred and preference
    stock are converted to common stock.  Income is divided by the
    average number of common shares outstanding and unconditionally
    issuable at the end of each month during the period, adjusted
    for the net effects of the exercise of options and warrants and
    the conversion of convertible preferred and preference stocks.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     THREE MONTHS ENDED        SIX MONTHS ENDED
                           APRIL 30              APRIL 30
                      ------------------      -----------------
Millions of Dollars     1997       1996        1997       1996  
---------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                  <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>

Net income .......   $     30   $     26    $     45   $     48
                     ========   ========    ========   ========
Average Common
  and common
  equivalent
  shares
  (millions):

Average common
  shares
  outstanding
  as adjusted
  per primary
  calculations
  (millions) .....       73.7       73.8       73.7       73.8
Assuming conversion
  of Series G
  Preferred Stock.         .6         .6         .6         .6
                     --------   --------   --------   --------
Average common
  and dilutive
  common
  equivalent
  shares as
  adjusted ......        74.3       74.4       74.3       74.4
                     ========   ========   ========   ========
Income per common
  share assuming
  full dilution
  (dollars):

Net income ......   $    .40 # $    .36 # $    .60 # $    .65 #
                    ========   ========   ========   ========
---------------
<FN>
#  This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K
   item 601(b)(11) of the Securities Exchange Act although it is
   contrary to paragraph 40 of APB Opinion No. 15 because it
   produces an anti-dilutive result.

</TABLE>

                            E-1
DIAGNOSTIC/RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, INC.

 EXHIBIT 11

 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATIONS OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                  Three Months Ended      Six Months Ended
                                     September 30,           September 30,
                                   1996        1995       1996         1995

 PRIMARY

 Net earnings for primary
   earnings per share         $ 1,396,000   $  915,000   $2,516,000   $1,571,000

 Weighted average number of
   shares outstanding (1)       5,510,000    5,488,000    5,492,000    5,461,000

 Add - common equivalent shares
   (determined using the "treasury
    stock" method) representing shares
    issuable upon exercise of employee
    stock options                 233,000      170,000      220,000      171,000

 Weighted average number of shares
    used in calculation of primary
    earnings per share          5,743,000    5,658,000    5,712,000    5,632,000

 Primary earnings per share     $    0.24    $    0.16    $    0.44    $    0.28


 FULLY DILUTED

 Net earnings                 $ 1,396,000    $ 915,000   $2,516,000   $1,571,000

 Add - interest on 8.5% Convertible
   Subordinated Debentures, net of
   applicable income taxes (2)     65,000            -      130,000            -

 Add - interest on 9% Senior
   Subordinated Convertible
   Debentures, net of applicable
   income taxes                   351,000            -      698,000            -

Add - amortization of deferred
    issuance costs relating to
    9% Senior Subordinated Convertible
    Debentures, net of applicable
    income taxes                   36,000            -       72,000            -

Net earnings for fully diluted
    earnings per share       $  1,848,000    $  915,000  $3,416,000   $1,571,000

 Weighted average number of shares
    used in calculation of primary
    earnings per share          5,743,000     5,658,000   5,712,000    5,632,000

 Add (deduct) incremental shares representing:

 Shares issuable upon exercise
    of stock options included in
    primary earnings per share
    calculation                  (233,000)     (170,000)   (220,000)   (171,000)

 Shares issuable upon exercise
    of stock options based on
    period-end market prices      239,000       233,000     242,000     211,000

 Shares issuable upon conversion
    of 8.5% Convertible
    Subordinated Debentures (2)   333,000             -     333,000           -

 Shares issuable upon conversion
    of 9% Senior Subordinated
    Convertible Debentures      2,825,000             -   2,825,000           -

 Weighted average number of shares
    used in calculation
    of fully diluted earnings   8,907,000      5,721,000  8,892,000   5,672,000

 Fully diluted earnings
    per share                  $     0.21     $     0.16  $    0.38 $      0.28


 (1) Effective April 1, 1996, Class A and Class B Common Stock were reclassified
into a new single class of Common Stock.  See Note 3 to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.

 (2) No adjustment made for all prior year periods, as the effect on reported
per share earnings was antidilutive.
#### § 933.762 Criteria for designating areas as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.

Part 762 of this chapter, *Criteria for Designation Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* shall apply to surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

AEC Annual Energy Consumption 

AEO Annual Energy Outlook 

ANOPR Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

ANSI American National Standards Institute 

ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning 

Engineers 

BOM bill of materials 

BT building technologies 

BTU British thermal units 

BVM beverage vending machine 

CBEC Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey 

CEC compressor energy consumption 

CFC chlorofluorocarbons 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COGS cost of goods sold 

CRE commercial refrigeration equipment 

CRI color rendering index 

CMER consumer marginal energy rates 

CSL candidate standard level 

DAT discharge air temperature 

DC direct current 

DEC daily energy consumption 

DOE U.S. Department of Energy 

DOJ U.S. Department of Justice 

ECM electronically commutated motors 

EER energy efficiency ratio 

EHD electro-hydrodynamic 

EIA Energy Information Administration 

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

EPACT 1992 Energy Policy Act of 1992 

EPACT 2005 Energy Policy Act of 2005 

EPCA Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 

°F degrees Fahrenheit 

FTC U.S. Federal Trade Commission 

GRIM Government Regulatory Impact Model 

HCFC hydrocholorofluorcarbon 

HFC hydrofluorocarbon 

INC incremental cost 

ImSET Impact of Sector Energy Technologies 

kWh kilowatt hours 

LCC life-cycle cost 

LED light emitting diode 

Low-E low-emissivity 

LSHX liquid-suction heat exchangers 

AA-i 

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 46
AA-ii 

MPC manufacturing production cost 

MIA manufacturer impact analysis 

MLP manufacturer list price 

MPC manufacturer production cost 

MSP manufacturer selling price 

NAICS North American Industry Classification System 

NEMS National Energy Modeling System 

NES national energy savings 

NIA national impact analysis 

NPV net present value 

NOPR Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

ODP ozone depletion potential 

PBP payback period 

PPI producer price indices 

PSI pounds per square inch 

PSC permanent split capacitor 

R&D research and development 

RTTC Refrigeration and Thermal Test Center 

RIA regulatory impact analysis 

SBA U.S. Small Business Administration 

SCT saturated condenser temperature 

SEC U.S. Securities Exchange Commission 

SET saturated evaporator temperature 

SPM shaded-pole motors 

TSD Technical Support Document 

TSL trial standard level 

USC United States Code 

W watt 

WACC weighted-average cost of capital 

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 46
### §200507. Conversion of recreation property

No property improved or developed with assistance under this chapter shall, without the approval of the Secretary, be converted to other than public recreation uses. The Secretary shall approve such a conversion only if the Secretary finds it to be in accord with the then-current local park and recreation recovery action program and only on such conditions as the Secretary considers necessary to ensure the provision of adequate recreation properties and opportunities of reasonably equivalent location and usefulness.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3186.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 200507 | 16 U.S.C. 2509. | Pub. L. 95–625, title X, §1010, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3543. |

Section

The words "then current" are substituted for "current" for clarity.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Thermostructural Analysis of a Diboride Composite Leading EdgeIn an effort to support the design of zirconium diboride composite leading edges for hypersonic vehicles, a finite element model (FEM) of a prototype leading edge was created and finite element analysis (FEA) was employed to assess its thermal and structural response to aerothermal boundary conditions. Unidirectional material properties for the structural components of the leading edge, a continuous fiber reinforced diboride composite, were computed with COSTAR. These properties agree well with those experimentally measured. To verify the analytical approach taken with COSMOS/M, an independent FEA of one of the leading edge assembly components was also done with COSTAR. Good agreement was obtained between the two codes. Both showed that a unidirectional lay-up had the best margin of safety for a simple loading case. Both located the maximum stress in the same region and ply. The magnitudes agreed within 4 percent. Trajectory based aerothermal heating was then applied to the leading edge assembly FEM created with COSMOS/M to determine steady state temperature response, displacement, stresses, and contact forces due to thermal expansion and thermal strains. Results show that the leading edge stagnation line temperature reached 4700 F. The maximum computed failure index for the laminated composite components peaks at 4.2, and is located at the bolt flange in layer 2 of the side bracket. The temperature gradient in the tip causes a compressive stress of 279 ksi along its width and substantial tensile stresses within its depth.Document ID19960048062Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKowalski, Tom*(Eloret Corp. Palo Alto, CA United States)*Buesking, Kent*(Mathematical Sciences Northwest, Inc. San Marcos, CA United States)*Kolodziej, Paul*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Bull, Jeff*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1996Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110407A-962040NASA-TM-110407Accession Number96N33567Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 242-80-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960048062.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024