alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, David A. Conway, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Water Chef, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





                                            /s/   David A. Conway
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                  David A. Conway, President
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

April 5, 2005
### §2545. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. C, title XXXI, §3132(a)(1)(A)(ii), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3060

Section, Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLII, §4235, formerly Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXI, §3134, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 927; renumbered Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLII, §4235, by Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(e)(20), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1762, provided procedures for meeting tritium production requirements.
§ 772.13 Coal exploration compliance duties. ( a ) All coal exploration and reclamation activities that substantially disturb the natural land surface shall be conducted in accordance with the coal exploration requirements of this part, part 815 of this chapter, the regulatory program, and any exploration permit term or condition imposed by the regulatory authority.
( b ) Any person who conducts any coal exploration in violation of the provisions of this part, part 815 of this chapter, the regulatory program, or any exploration permit term or condition imposed by the regulatory authority shall be subject to the provisions of section 518 of the Act, subchapter L of this chapter, and the applicable inspection and enforcement provisions of the regulatory program.
Exhibit 31.02

I, Catherine Thompson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of VINOBLE, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e) for the registrant and we have:

         a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this quarterly report and our
         conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
         procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
         report based on such evaluation; and

          c. disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during; the
         registrant's fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which is
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: February 22, 2005

/s/ Catherine Thompson
----------------------

Catherine Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
### §21122. Activities under Program

#### (a) In general

In carrying out the Program, the Commission (in consultation with the chief election official of each State) shall develop materials, sponsor seminars and workshops, engage in advertising targeted at students, make grants, and take such other actions as it considers appropriate to meet the purposes described in section 21121(b) of this title.

#### (b) Requirements for grant recipients

In making grants under the Program, the Commission shall ensure that the funds provided are spent for projects and activities which are carried out without partisan bias or without promoting any particular point of view regarding any issue, and that each recipient is governed in a balanced manner which does not reflect any partisan bias.

#### (c) Coordination with institutions of higher education

The Commission shall encourage institutions of higher education (including community colleges) to participate in the Program, and shall make all necessary materials and other assistance (including materials and assistance to enable the institution to hold workshops and poll worker training sessions) available without charge to any institution which desires to participate in the Program.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title V, §502, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1717.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15522 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 1615.2 Responsibility of Director of Selective Service in registration.

Whenever the President by proclamation or other public notice fixes a day or days for registration, the Director of Selective Service shall take the necessary steps to prepare for registration and, on the day or days fixed, shall supervise the registration of those persons required to present themselves for and submit to registration. The Director of Selective Service shall also arrange for and supervise the registration of those persons who present themselves for registration at times other than on the day or days fixed for any registration.
# C_2008142EN.01002301.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/23

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 April 2008 — PKK v Council

(Case T-229/02) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Action for annulment - Statement of reasons)

(2008/C 142/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Osman Ocalan, on behalf of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) (represented by: M. Muller QC, E. Grieves and P. Moser, barristers, and J.G. Pierce, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by: M. Vitsentzatos and M. Bishop, and subsequently by M. Bishop and E. Finnegan, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by: R. Caudwell, and subsequently by E. Jenkinson, Agents, assisted by S. Lee, Barrister) and Commission of the European Communities, (represented by: P. Kuijper and C. Brown, and subsequently by P. Hetsch and P. Aalto, Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Re:

Annulment of Council Decision 2002/460/EC: of 17 June 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/334/EC (OJ 2002 L 160, p. 26)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision 2002/460/EC of 17 June 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/334/EC in so far as it concerns the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision 2002/460/EC of 17 June 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/334/EC in so far as it concerns the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK).

| 2. | Orders the Council to bear, in addition to its own costs, all the costs incurred by Osman Ocalan on behalf of the PKK before the Court of First Instance and the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council to bear, in addition to its own costs, all the costs incurred by Osman Ocalan on behalf of the PKK before the Court of First Instance and the Court of Justice.

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Commission of the European Communities to pay their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Commission of the European Communities to pay their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 28.9.2002.

1

---
#### § 1633.3 Submission of claims.

Except as otherwise expressly provided by the Director, no document relating to any registrant's claims or potential claims will be retained by the Selective Service System and no file relating to a registrant's possible classification status will be established prior to that registrant being ordered to report for induction.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Jack C. BridgesJack C. BridgesExecutive Vice-PresidentNovember 21, 2008Date
#### § 942.25 Approval of Tennessee abandoned mine land reclamation plan amendments.

The following is a list of the dates amendments were submitted to OSM, the dates when the Director's decision approving all, or portions of these amendments, were published in the Federal Register and the State citations or a brief description of each amendment. The amendments in this table are listed in order of the date of final publication in the Federal Register.

| Original amendment submission date | Date of publication of final rule | Citation/Description of approved provisions |
| --- | --- | --- |
| April 6, 2011 | February 12, 2013 | Revised AML Plan. TCA Section 59-8-324(m). |

[[78 FR 9807](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/78-FR-9807), Feb. 12, 2013]
#### BRAUNSTEIN v. AMERICAN BONDING TRUST CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1. Attachment—Dismissal—Counsel Fees.

Where, after a motion by defendant in attachment to vacate on new facts, and pending the hearing the claim in suit is settled by payment in full, and the motion granted on consent, the defendant is not entitled, under the attachment bond, to costs for counsel fees in the proceedings to vacate.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.

Action by Moses L. Braunstein against the American Bonding Trust Company on an undertaking in attachment. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

*983Clarence P. Moser, for appellant.

Aaron Morris, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

After denial of a motion to vacate an attachment upon the papers, the defendant to the action moved to vacate upon new facts, but pending the hearing settled the claim in suit by payment in full, and the motion was granted upon consent, with a discontinuance of the action. The present action was brought by the plaintiff (the attachment defendant) upon the undertaking given on the attachment, and the judgment appealed from was rendered in his favor for the reasonable expense incurred for the services of counsel in the proceedings to vacate the warrant; which proceedings, as noted, terminated an order entered upon consent.

To permit a recovery in such a case certainly does not accord with substantial justice, and the result reached does not appear to be required by any technicality which may be resorted to. The creditor’s consent to the granting of the motion to vacate the attachment upon payment of this small debt could not have implied an understanding that he should pay (through his surety) a very substantial sum to the adverse party’s attorney for services which resulted in nothing. The circumstances under which the vacating order was obtained can only import a waiver of the defendant’s damages by reason of the attachment, for the parties could have acted on no other understanding. Again, if, technically, the undertaking was enforceable, the recovery of counsel fees upon the motion to vacate the warrant was not within that undertaking, since the vacatur was not obtained through the services of counsel to that end, but through the party’s own payment of his debt. The damages claimed, therefore, were not sustained by reason of the attachment, because not necessarily involved in the proceedings to vacate it. In substantial effect the action proceedings to vacate were abandoned with the very payment of the claim there in suit, and the vacating order became the sequence of the settlement, not of the motion to vacate, in the course of which the services of counsel were rendered. There is no dispute, nor suggested ground for dispute, upon the facts, all material matters as to the vacating of this attachment being admitted for the purposes of the record. The plaintiff has no right of recovery which might be established upon a new trial, and the judgment is accordingly reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. All concur.
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FORTEE PROPERTIES, Inc.

No. 187, Docket 22791.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued March 2, 1954.

Decided April 5, 1954.

H. Brian Holland, Ellis N. Slack and S. Walter Shine, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Irwin D. Shapiro, New York City, for respondent.

Before CHASE, Chief Judge, and FRANK and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The question presented is whether a condemnation award to a mortgagee on a non-assumed mortgage -is taxable as a gain to the owner of the properties under the provisions of § 112(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 112(f). The Tax Court found that the taxpayer’s “property was condemned and involuntarily converted into money in the amount of $44,096.67,” and accordingly held that no gain to the taxpayer was to *916be recognized on the payment to the mortgagee. The tacit assumption essential to the court’s decision is that the word “property” in § 112(f) of the Internal Revenue Code means no more than the taxpayer's equitable interest in the land and the buildings. We disagree. In our view, the decision here should be governed by the rationale of Crane v. Commissioner, 331 U.S. 1, 67 S.Ct. 1047, 1054, 91 L.Ed. 1301, interpreting the meaning of “property” under § 113 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 113. The Crane case involved the computation of tax gain on the sale of depreciable property subject to a non-assumed mortgage. The Supreme Court held the value of the mortgage must be included in determining the base and the amount realized on the sale. The decision, distinguishing the words “property” and “equity,” reasoned that “property” could not be restricted to mean merely the owner’s rights over and above encumbrances.

While the Crane case can literally be distinguished as involving a different section and a different type of transaction, we think both the reasoning and spirit of the opinion are applicable here. The basis of the taxpayer’s argument here is that, since he was not personally liable on the mortgage, he received no benefit and, hence, no gain on the satisfaction of the mortgage by payment to the mortgagee. This contention was rejected in the Crane case as to a transfer of property subject to a non-assumed mortgage. There the Court said that one “not personally liable on the debt, who sells the property subject to the mortgage and for an additional consideration, realizes benefit in the amount of the mortgage * * Similarly, satisfaction of a non-assumed mortgage, by payment to the mortgagee, benefits taxpayer in the case at bar. In practical terms, for the purpose of protecting-his property from foreclosure, where the value of the property is greater than the amount of the mortgage, the taxpayer-mortgagor has to treat the obligations of a non-assumed mortgage as if they were his personal obligations. Payment to the mortgagee relieved the owner of this necessity.

Reversed.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02239

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 02239\02239_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02239\02239_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 02239\02239_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02239\02239_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02239\02239_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02239\02239_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02239\02239_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02239\02239_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02239\02239_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02239\02239_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

02239\Certification Statement Plant ID 02239.PDF Plant certification statement

x 02239\Supplemental Documents\02239_Part A KS Water Balance.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02239\Supplemental Documents\02239_Part A Map-1.JPG Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02239\Supplemental Documents\02239_Part A Map-2.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02239\Supplemental Documents\02239_Part A Map-3.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02239\Supplemental Documents\02239_Part D Flow Diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02239\Supplemental Documents\02239_Part F Map-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02239\Supplemental Documents\Part F Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.