alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 774
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54944, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 774 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93325-93326, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 774.13 Permit revisions. ( a ) *General.* During the term of a permit, the permittee may submit an application to the regulatory authority for a revision of the permit.
( b ) *Application requirements and procedures.* the regulatory authority shall establish— ( 1 ) A time period within which the regulatory authority will approve or disapprove an application for a permit revision; and
( 2 ) Guidelines establishing the scale or extent of revisions for which all the permit application information requirements and procedures of this subchapter, including notice, public participation, and notice of decision requirements of §§ 773.6, 773.19(b) (1) and (3), and 778.21, shall apply. Such requirements and procedures shall apply at a minimum to all significant permit revisions.
( c ) *Criteria for approval.* No application for a permit revision shall be approved unless the application demonstrates and the regulatory authority finds that reclamation as required by the Act and the regulatory program can be accomplished, applicable requirements under § 773.15 which are pertinent to the revision are met, and the application for a revision complies with all requirements of the Act and the regulatory program.
( d ) *Request to change permit boundary.* Any extensions to the area covered by the permit, except incidental boundary revisions, shall be made by application for a new permit.
[48 FR 44395, Sept. 28, 1983, as amended at 65 FR 79668, Dec. 19, 2000]
### **CHAPTER 65—TELEWORK**

Sec.
6501.
Definitions.
6502.
Executive agencies telework requirement.
6503.
Training and monitoring.
6504.
Policy and support.
6505.
Telework Managing Officer.
6506.
Reports.
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Tangent Solutions, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the calendar year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Charles M. Moche, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By:      /s/ Charles M. Moche
         -----------------------
         Charles M. Moche
         Chief Financial Officer
         October 31, 2003



This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-KSB pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ws
a U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

science fora changing world U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1411-B

Transmissivity of and maximum yields from the Park City-State Bridge zone—PLATE 10
Geldon, A... 2002, Hycrologic properties and ground-water flow systems of the Paleozoic rocks in the Upper
Colorado River Basin in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, excluding the San Juan Basin

intenelle
prvoir

ans
=Moab 7 1

Vere!

1:2,000,000
C) 25 50 a ae MILES
IF lime T T T
() 25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS
COMPOSITE TRANSMISSIVITY

Suphu

tee

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO
RIVER BASIN

Navajo

Reservoir ul

ontenelle
rvoir

BOUNDARY OF
UPPER COLORADO
RIVER BASIN

AREA EXCLUDED FROM STUDY

a BS
Navajo =

Reservoir pe

108°
1:2,000,000
Cy) 25 50 a 100 MILES
| 1 | !
I T T T T
0 25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS.
MAXIMUM YIELDS

wie

Composite Transmissivity

a

—10—

Maximum Yields

=|
aaa

— 10 —

Area where the Park City-State Bridge zone is missing because of erosion
or nondeposition

Relative composite transmissivity
Large
Moderate
Small

Line of equal estimated composite transmissivity—Location is approximate.
Interval, in feet squared per day, is variable

Limit of data

Relative maximum yield
Large
Moderate
Small

Line of equal yield from wells and springs under artesian conditions—
Location is approximate. Interval, in gallons per minute, is variable. Map is
based on maximum measured, reported, or estimated values in boreholes or
survey sections

Limit of data

Data sites

Borehole—Discharge during a drill-stem test, flow into a well during drilling,

Spring—Large springs mentioned in the text are labeled

EXPLANATION

or flow from a well without drawdown after completion is indicated

Base from U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. base map, 1:2,500,000

IN ARIZONA, COLORADO, UTAH, AND WYOMING
By
Arthur L. Geldon
2002

COMPOSITE TRANSMISSIVITY OF AND MAXIMUM YIELDS FROM THE PARK CITY-STATE BRIDGE ZONE OF THE CANYONLANDS AQUIFER IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN AND VICINITY
AQ-PLN-96:063

W~5~1 ~

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Fife Symington, Governor Russell F. Rhoades, Director

March 12, 1996

Ms. Felicia Marcus

Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region IX

Mail Code - RA

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, California 94105

Dear Ms. Marcus:

SUBJECT: Commitment to correct deficiencies in the Arizona New Source Review and

Title V programs

This letter constitutes the formal commitment of the State of Arizona to correct certain

deficiencies identified by U.S.E.P.A. Region IX with respect to the operating permits programs

submitted to the Region on November 15, 1993, in accordance with the requirements of Title V

of the Clean Air Act; and revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) governing major

modifications and new major stationary sources of air pollution submitted to the Region on August

15, 1994, in accordance with the requirements of Title I of the Act.

ADEQ hereby commits to make the following revisions to is rules governing operating permits

under Title V of the Act:

• Revise AAC R18-2-101(61)(b)(i) in the definition, “Major Source”, to clarify that all

fugitive emissions of hazardous air pollutants will be taken into account for determining

the status of a stationary source as major under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act.

• Revise AAC Ri 8-2-306(A)(10) to clarify that emissions trading between sources is allowed

without a permit revision unless prohibited under an applicable implementation plan.

ADEQ hereby commits to make the following revisions to its rules governing approvals to

construct for new major sources and major modifications under Title I of the Act:

3033 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85012, (602)207-2300
Page 2

Ms. Felicia Marcus

March 12, 1996

AQ-PLN-96:063

• Revise AAC R18-2-401(9)(a) in defmition of “Major Source” to include thresholds

applicable in serious and severe ozone nonattainment areas for potential to emit oxides of

nitrogen that are identical to those for volatile organic compounds, to comply with the

requirements of §~182(c), (d) and (f) of the Act.

• Revise AAC R18-2-404(L) to comply with Section 173(a) of the Act, to require that

emissions offsets be enforceable at the time of permit issuance.

All of the aforementioned rule revisions are currently in process, and scheduled to be fmal and

in effect by November, 1996. They will be submitted to U.S.E.P.A. Region IX for approval at

that time.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions, please call Nancy

Wrona at (602) 207-2308, or Ira Domsky at (602) 207-2365.

~

Sincerely, 4/?~~4/

Russell ~. Rhoades

Director

RFR:IMD:vjm

cc: Nancy Wrona

Ira Domsky

Debbie Jordan

Matt Haber
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9877 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9877

  To impose limitations on the amount of unobligated balances of the 
    Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2024

 Mr. Mooney (for himself, Mr. Barr, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Ogles, Mr. 
 Meuser, Mr. Norman, Mr. Williams of Texas, and Mr. Lopez) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To impose limitations on the amount of unobligated balances of the 
    Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CFPB Budget Integrity Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON UNOBLIGATED BALANCES OF THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER 
              FINANCIAL PROTECTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1017(a)(2) of the Consumer Financial 
Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5497(a)(2)) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Limitation on unobligated balances.--For a 
                fiscal year, the amount of unobligated balances of the 
                Bureau may not exceed 5 percent of the dollar amount 
                referred to in subparagraph (A)(iii). The Director 
                shall transfer any excess amount of such unobligated 
                balances to the general fund of the Treasury.''.
    (b) Report on Use of Unobligated Balances.--Section 1017(e)(4) of 
such Act (12 U.S.C. 5497(e)(4)) is amended by inserting ``(including a 
description of the use of any unobligated balances)'' after ``funds of 
the Bureau''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. David Norris, highway com’r of Kinderhook Township, etc., and Frank Saxbury, highway com’r of Cincinnati Township, etc., appellants, v. James C. Gay et al., commissioners of Sny Island Levee Drainage District, etc., appellees.

Gen. No. 7,782.

Mandamus to compel drainage commissioners to rebuild and reconstruct highway bridge. Decree for petitioners. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pike county; the Hon. Harry Higbee, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 11, 1925.

Williams & Williams, for appellants.

Paul P. Grote, for appellees; William and Barry Mumford, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 1697.4 Notice requirements. ( a ) Deductions shall not be made unless the employee is provided with written notice signed by the Director of the debt at least 30 days before salary offset commences.
( b ) The written notice shall contain: ( 1 ) A statement that the debt is owed and an explanation of its nature and amount;
( 2 ) The agency's intention to collect the debt by deducting from the employee's current disposable pay account;
( 3 ) The amount, frequency, proposed beginning date, and duration of the intended deduction(s);
( 4 ) An explanation of interest, penalties, and administrative charges, including a statement that such charges will be assessed unless excused in accordance with the Federal Claims Collection Standards at 4 CFR 101.1 *et seq.;*
( 5 ) The employee's right to inspect or request and receive a copy of government records relating to the debt;
( 6 ) The opportunity to establish a written schedule for the voluntary repayment of the debt;
( 7 ) The right to a hearing conducted by an impartial hearing official;
( 8 ) The methods and time period for petitioning for hearings;
( 9 ) A statement that the timely filing of a petition for a hearing will stay the commencement of collection proceedings;
( 10 ) A statement that a final decision on the hearing will be issued not later than 60 days after the filing of the petition requesting the hearing unless the employee requests and the hearing official grants a delay in the proceedings;
( 11 ) A statement that any knowingly false or frivolous statements, representations, or evidence may subject the employee to: ( i ) Disciplinary procedures appropriate under chapter 75 of title 5 U.S.C., part 752 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, or any other applicable statutes or regulations;
( ii ) Penalties under the False Claims Act, sections 3729 through 3731 of title 31 U.S.C., or any other applicable statutory authority; or
( iii ) Criminal penalties under sections 286, 287, 1001, and 1002 of title 18 U.S.C., or any other applicable statutory authority.
( 12 ) A statement of other rights and remedies available to the employee under statutes or regulations governing the program for which the collection is being made; and
( 13 ) Unless there are contractual or statutory provisions to the contrary, a statement that amounts paid on or deducted for the debt which are later waived or found not owed to the United States will be promptly refunded to the employee.
Exhibit 12.  Questar Pipeline Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  Year Ended December 31,200820072006(dollars in millions)EarningsIncome before income taxes$  91.4$  71.7$72.7Plus interest expense32.721.723.8Plus allowance for borrowed funds usedduring construction0.47.30.4Less Companys share of earnings of equity investee(0.6)Plus interest portion of rental expense1.71.20.8$125.6$101.9$97.7Fixed ChargesInterest expense$  32.7$ 21.7$23.8Plus allowance for borrowed funds usedduring construction0.47.30.4Plus interest portion of rental expense1.71.20.8$ 34.8$30.2$25.0Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges3.63.43.9  For purposes of this presentation, earnings represent income before income taxes adjusted for fixed charges, earnings and distributions of an equity investee. Income before income taxes includes Questar Pipelines share of pretax earnings of an equity investee. Fixed charges consist of total interest charges (expensed and capitalized), amortization of debt issuance costs and losses from reacquired debt, and the interest portion of rental expense estimated at 50%.
Exhibit 99.1



                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Consolidated Freightways Corporation (the "Company") for the
period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Brincko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report complies fully with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
     as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operations of the Company.


/s/John Brincko
John Brincko
Chief Executive Officer
September 3, 2002
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
W. Bracke, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By        /s/ JAMES W. BRACKE
  ------------------------------------------
James W. Bracke, Ph.D.
President, Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer), Secretary and Director
February 7, 2003
EXHIBIT 10.335


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  (NO INTEREST)

$45,800.00                     Glendale, California                June 29, 2000




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Prisciliano Flores (Payor") promises to pay in lawful
money of the United States of America to Pollution Research and Control Corp., a
California corporation ("Payee"), or order, at Glendale, California, the sum of
$45,800.00 Dollars from the date hereof on the unpaid principal payable in
installments of principal only in the sum of $50.00 Dollars commencing on July
15, 2000 and payable on the same day of each month thereafter until paid in
full.

     The unpaid principal may be prepaid without penalty. Each payment hereunder
shall be credited to the principal amount.

     If each installment under this note is not paid when due, the undersigned
shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not suit or action is commenced to enforce payment of this note, and
Payee may, at its option, declare the entire amount of the then unpaid principal
immediately due and payable if such default is not cured within 10 days after
Payee provides the undersigned written notice of such default. The undersigned
hereby waives presentment, notice of dishonor and protest.

     This note is secured by shares of Payee's common stock, no par value (the
"Shares"), pursuant to a certain Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 29,
2000 (the "Pledge Agreement").

     Upon the termination of employment of Payor as an employee of Payee for any
reason, the unpaid balance of this note shall be cancelled, and the pro rata
portion of Shares which then not fully paid for, shall be returned to Payee
pursuant to the terms of the Pledge Agreement.

                                        Payor:



                                        /s/ Prisciliano Flores
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        (Signature)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9943 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize certain claims for 

personal injury or death caused by medical malpractice onboard certain 

naval vessels, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2024 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself and Mr. DESAULNIER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize certain 

claims for personal injury or death caused by medical 

malpractice onboard certain naval vessels, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seaman Danyelle 

5 Luckey Military Medical Accountability Amendment Act 

6 of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9943 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS FOR PER2 SONAL INJURY OR DEATH CAUSED BY MED3 ICAL MALPRACTICE ONBOARD CERTAIN 

4 NAVAL VESSELS. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Section 2733a of title 10, 

6 United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting ‘‘or on8 board a covered naval vessel of the United States 

9 that, at the time of such occurrence, was not en10 gaged in combat operations’’ after ‘‘facility’’; and 

11 (2) in subsection (j)— 

12 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and 

13 (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

14 (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the 

15 following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(2) COVERED NAVAL VESSEL.—The term ‘cov17 ered naval vessel’ means an aircraft carrier, landing 

18 helicopter assault ship, or landing helicopter dock 

19 ship.’’. 

20 (b) APPLICABILITY; FILING PERIOD FOR CERTAIN

21 CLAIMS.— 

22 (1) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made 

23 by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to claims 

24 that accrue— 

25 (A) during the period described in para26 graph (2)(B); or 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9943 IH

1 (B) on or after the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act. 

3 (2) FILING PERIOD.— 

4 (A) IN GENERAL.—Any claim regarding an 

5 act or omission constituting medical malpractice 

6 onboard a navel vessel as specified in section 

7 2733a(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code (as 

8 amended by subsection (a)) that accrues during 

9 the period described in subparagraph (B) and is 

10 filed not later than 90 days after the date of 

11 the enactment of this Act— 

12 (i) shall be deemed to be filed within 

13 the time period specified in section 

14 2733a(b)(4) of such title; and 

15 (ii) notwithstanding section 2735 of 

16 such title, may be allowed, settled, and 

17 paid under section 2733a(a) of such title. 

18 (B) PERIOD DESCRIBED.—The period de19 scribed in this subparagraph is the period be20 ginning on October 1, 2016, and ending on the 

21 day before the date of the enactment of this 

22 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB