alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Abraham S. Berg et al., appellants, v. J. D. Annenberg et al., appellees.

Gen. No. 7,380.

Action for goods sold. Dismissed. Appeal from the City Court of Aurora; the Hon. Edward M. Mangan, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October' term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 27, 1925.

Pred B. Shearer, for appellants; Charles B. Dickerson, of counsel.

Samuel J. Stephens, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### MEREDITH et al. v. CABELL et al.

No. 11973.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 5, 1954.

Decided April 15, 1954.

*811Mr. Earl J. Lombard, Washington, D. C., Mr. Ernest G. Barnes, Washington, D. C., on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Walter J. Cahill, Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, PRET-TYMAN and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellee, Mrs. Alice B. Cabell, and her husband, who is now dead, were the makers of promissory notes aggregating $10,200, secured by deeds of trust on realty. The payee of the notes endorsed them to the appellant, Maurice M. Meredith.

 In this suit the loan transaction was attacked as usurious. The District Court found Meredith was not, as he claimed, a holder in due course for value without notice, but that he had actually and knowingly lent the money to the Cabells and had used the payee as an intermediary to avoid the usury statute, § 28-2703, D.C.Code 1951. It was also found that Meredith had advanced to the Cabells in return for the notes only the sum of $7,510, of which $5,476.10 had been repaid, leaving a balance of $2,033.-28 due the creditor. Having so found, the District Court adjudged that, unless the unpaid balance were paid within thirty days, the trustees designated in the deeds of trust might sell the property to satisfy the amount found to be due.

The findings of fact were supported by the evidence and the judgment gave relief appropriate in the circumstances. It follows that Meredith’s appeal must fail.

Affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 816
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 816 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 816.66 Use of explosives: Blasting signs, warnings, and access control. ( a ) *Blasting signs.* Blasting signs shall meet the specifications of § 816.11. The operator shall— ( 1 ) Conspicuously place signs reading “Blasting Area” along the edge of any blasting area that comes within 100 feet of any public road right-of-way, and at the point where any other road provides access to the blasting area; and
( 2 ) At all entrances to the permit area from public roads or highways, place conspicuous signs which state “Warning! Explosives in Use,” which clearly list and describe the meaning of the audible blast warning and all-clear signals that are in use, and which explain the marking of blasting areas and charged holes awaiting firing within the permit area.
( b ) *Warnings.* Warning and all-clear signals of different character or pattern that are audible within a range of 1 ⁄ 2 mile from the point of the blast shall be given. Each person within the permit area and each person who resides or regularly works within 1 ⁄ 2 mile of the permit area shall be notified of the meaning of the signals in the blasting schedule.
( c ) *Access control.* Access within the blasting area shall be controlled to prevent presence of livestock or unauthorized persons during blasting and until an authorized representative of the operator has reasonably determined that— ( 1 ) No unusual hazards, such as imminent slides or undetonated charges, exist; and
( 2 ) Access to and travel within the blasting area can be safely resumed.
[48 FR 9807, Mar. 8, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017]
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1012 

Condemning the treatment of Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu by the Government of 

Azerbaijan and urging his immediate release, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2024 

Mr. ROUZER (for himself, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Ms. 

MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. LAWLER, Mrs. KIM of California, Mr. 

PALLONE, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. KIM of 

New Jersey, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. COSTA, Mr. 

ESPAILLAT, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. TITUS, Ms. ADAMS, Mr. 

MOULTON, and Mr. ALLRED) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the treatment of Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu by the 

Government of Azerbaijan and urging his immediate release, and for other purposes. 

Whereas Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu, a respected academic and 

economist, and his wife were arrested by Azerbaijani authorities on July 23, 2023, and severely beaten while in 

police custody; 

Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu was dubiously accused by Azerbaijani 

authorities of multiple criminal acts without evidence; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1012 IH 

Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu remains imprisoned at the Baku Detention Center in extremely poor conditions while awaiting trial; 

Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu’s health continues to deteriorate significantly since his initial arrest, and he has not received 

adequate medical treatment for his conditions; 

Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu has been repeatedly denied access to 

his legal counsel and a fair trial while in custody; 

Whereas the Department of State and the United States Embassy in Baku, alongside United States academic institutions and organizations in the international community, 

have expressed deep concerns regarding Dr. Ibadoghlu’s 

health and have demanded his immediate release; and 

Whereas the wrongful detention of Dr. Ibadoghlu is a serious 

affront to human rights and academic freedom: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the treatment of Dr. Ibadoghlu 

3 by the Government of Azerbaijan, their practice of 

4 wrongful detention, and their suppression of aca5 demic freedom; 

6 (2) calls for Dr. Ibadoghlu’s immediate and un7 conditional release; and 

8 (3) urges the Secretary of State to continue 

9 prioritizing Dr. Ibadoghlu’s well-being and release in 

10 all engagements with the Government of Azerbaijan. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Section
      1350 Certification**





In
      connection with the annual report of China Industrial Waste Management, Inc.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dong Jinqing, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.




April
              4,
              2008
            
            /s/
              Dong
              JinqingDong
                  Jinqing
                Chief
                  Executive
                  Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Bureau of Land Management

Casper, Kemmerer, Newcastle, 

Pinedale, Rawlins, and Rock Springs 

Field Offices

Approved Resource Management 

Plan Amendment for Greater 

Sage-Grouse

ATTACHMENT 4

From the USDI 2015 Record of Decision and Approved Resource

Management Plan Amendments for the Rocky Mountain Region including the Greater 

Sage-Grouse Sub-Regions of: Lewistown, North Dakota, Northwest Colorado and 

Wyoming and the Approved Resource Management Plans for Billings, Buffalo, Cody, 

HiLine, Miles City, Pompeys Pillar National Monument, South Dakota and Worland

September 2015

Wyoming 
 

 

MISSION STATEMENT 

To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands 

for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. 

BLM/WY/PL-15/023+1610
### §§83 to 85. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 83, act May 29, 1928, ch. 853, §1, 45 Stat. 928, related to ammunition for use of Army and Navy, storage and dispersal, control by a joint board of officers. See section 172 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 84, act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 133, §1, 18 Stat. 455, related to expenditure at armories for perfection of patentable inventions.

Section 85, act Mar. 3, 1921, ch. 128, §6, 41 Stat. 1352, authorized Secretary of War to proceed with installation of guns and howitzers.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ultra Petroleum Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
D. Watford, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.




Date:  November 12, 2003               By:
       -----------------                   ------------------------------------
                                           Michael D. Watford
                                           Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and President

This certification is being furnished solely for purposes of compliance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that Section. Registration Statements or other documents filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit
by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Ultra Petroleum Corp. and will be retained by Ultra Petroleum Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997         
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                            490,961
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      36,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       18,000
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  509,126
<PP&E>                                          7,071,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,244,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  5,335,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              92,405
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                      5,242,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    5,335,401
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,124,039
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     631,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   96,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   396,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               396,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      396,603
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       25.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       25.11
                                               

</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 1783 V

UNPUBLISHED

LAURA COSDEN

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: March 14, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for Petitioner.

Meghan Murphy , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On December 7, 2020

, L aura Cosden filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) caused by a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pe rtussis ( “ Td ap ” ) vaccin ation on March 2 7, 2020 . Petition at 1

. Petitioner further alleges th at the

vaccine was administered within the United States, th at she suffered from her injury for

more than six mo n ths, and that neither Petitioner nor any other party has received

co mpensation in the form of an award or settlement fo r her vaccine

- relat ed injury . Petition

at 4

- 5

. T he case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special

Masters.

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I wil l redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 On March 9, 2022

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent co ncluded that Petitioner has satisfied the criteria s et forth in the Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Int erpretation for a SIRVA

. Id.

at 5 . Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has sat isfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the V a ccine Act

. Id. at 6.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
### §13110. Authority of Comptroller General

(a) Access to Financial Disclosure Reports.—The Comptroller General shall have access to financial disclosure reports filed under this subchapter for the purposes of carrying out the Comptroller General's statutory responsibilities.

(b) Studies.—Not later than December 31, 1992, and regularly thereafter, the Comptroller General shall conduct a study to determine whether the provisions of this subchapter are being carried out effectively.

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(c), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4295.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 13110 | 5 U.S.C. App. (EGA §108) | Pub. L. 95–521, title I, §108, Oct. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 1835; Pub. L. 96–19, §9(t), June 13, 1979, 93 Stat. 44; Pub. L. 101–194, title II, §202, Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1741. |

Section
#### Samuel H. Randall, Respondent, *v.*Emerson P. Carpenter, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

(Argued March 8, 1882;

decided March 21, 1882.)

*F. P. Wilder*for appellant.

*658
      *Samuel II. Randall,*respondent, in person.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
#### § 939.777 General content requirements for permit applications.

Part 777 of this chapter, *General Content Requirements for Permit Applications,* shall apply to any person who applies for a permit to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.

[52 FR 13814, Apr. 24, 1987]
EXHIBIT 10.2

                                  Certification
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
    (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Tele Nordeste Celular Participacoes S.A., a
Brazilian sociedade anonima (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

         The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Form 20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  By:   /s/ Mario Cesar Pereira de Araujo
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Mario Cesar Pereira de Araujo
Dated:  May 19, 2004                    Title: Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  May 19, 2004              By:   /s/ Walmir Urbano Kesseli
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Walmir Urbano Kesseli
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tele
Nordeste Celular Participacoes S.A. and will be retained by Tele Nordeste
Celular Participacoes S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Irving Hirsch, Respondent. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.

Appeal by the Industrial Commissioner from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. Claimant was employed by a night club, in a covered employment under the Unemployment Insurance Law, to run an elevator and take out garbage for two hours a day, six days a week, at $13.50 a week. He was separately employed by waiters in the night club to serve them meals, bring coffee, and clear the *674tables. He performed no services for the club’s patrons. Each waiter contributed to claimant’s wage for the work he did for him, from 50 cents to $1 a week. It is not disputed that the amount received by claimant directly from the club ($13.50) would not be sufficient to meet the minimum requirements of the statute of $15 a week (Labor Law, § 527, subd. 1), and that in order to be qualified, both forms of work would have to be considered the employment of the night club. The initial determination was that claimant was ineligible; and this was upheld by the Referee, but the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reversed and held that the hiring of claimant by the waiters, as employees of the night club, fell within subdivision 2 of section 560 of the Labor Law and brought claimant’s work for them within the covered employment. The statute does not fairly admit of this interpretation under the facts of this case. It provides that whenever any employee *“*engages any other person in the work which said * * * employee is doing for the employer, such employer shall for all purposes hereof be deemed the employer of such other person ” without regard to which one actually pays him; or knowledge of the hiring arrangement. It is clear, however, that the waiters hired the claimant to serve them personally and not to help them carry out the employer’s work or the work the waiters were doing for the night club. The arrangement for such personal services did not, therefore, fall within the employment in which the waiters were engaged. Decision reversed and initial determination affirmed, without costs.
### §3115. Submission of legislative proposals

Not later than 45 days after the date on which the President submits to Congress the budget for each fiscal year pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees, the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives any legislative provisions that are proposed by the Director to be enacted as part of the annual intelligence authorization bill for that fiscal year.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title V, §516, as added Pub. L. 118–31, div. G, title III, §7313, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 1030.)