alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Lorus Therapeutics Inc (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ended May 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I James T. Parsons, VP
Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



By:  /s/ James T. Parsons
     --------------------------------------------------
     James T. Parsons,
     VP Finance and Administration and
     Chief Financial Officer




Date:  December 13, 2002
       -----------------------------------
The Wyoming Greater Sage-Grouse

Draft Land Use Plan Amendment and

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Volume 2: Chapters 4 – 5, Figures, Maps

December 2013
BLM/WY/PL-14/006+1110 

The BLM’s multiple-use mission is to sustain the health and productivity of the 

public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. The 

Bureau accomplishes this by managing such activities as outdoor recreation, 

livestock grazing, mineral development, and energy production, and by 

conserving natural, historical, cultural, and other resources on public lands.
#### § 947.827 Special performance standards—coal processing plants and support facilities not located at or near the minesite or not within the permit area for a mine.

Part 827 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Coal Processing Plants and Support Facilities Not Located at or Near the Minesite or Not Within the Permit Area for a Mine,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations which include the operation of coal processing plants and support facilities not located at or near the minesite and not within the permit area for a mine.
Exhibit 10(b)

                         CONSENT OF SHEARMAN & STERLING

      We hereby consent to the reference to our firm included in Part A and Part
B of Amendment No. 12 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A (811-7885) of
Quantitative Master Series Trust.

                                                        /s/ Shearman & Sterling
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Shearman & Sterling

New York, NY
December 5, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000764606
<NAME>                        ROYAL PALM BEACH COLONY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         3,113,800
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  401,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,379,916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,895,688
<PP&E>                                         24,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                 21,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,936,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          283,345
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,652,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,936,309
<SALES>                                        7,999,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,411,560
<CGS>                                          3,729,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,729,906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,527,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             47,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,106,905
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,106,905
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,106,905
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
#### § 585.534 When may BOEM cancel my financial assurance?

(a) When your lease or grant ends, your sureties remain responsible, and BOEM will cancel your financial assurance as shown in the following table:

| Financial assurance | Your financial assurance will not be cancelled until . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Financial assurance for commercial leases submitted under § 585.516(a)(1) and for grants or limited leases submitted under §§ 585.520 and 585.521 | Seven years after all operations and activities under the lease or grant cease, including decommissioning and site clearance, or a longer period as necessary to complete any appeals or judicial litigation related to your financial assurance obligation. BOEM may reduce or cancel your financial assurance or return some or all of your security if BOEM determines that the full amount is no longer needed. |
| (2) Supplemental financial assurance for commercial leases submitted under § 585.516 and for grants or limited leases submitted under §§ 585.520 and 585.521 | (i) The lease or grant expires or is terminated and BOEM determines you have met your secured obligations, unless BOEM:
(A) Determines that the future potential liability resulting from any undetected problem is greater than the amount of your lease-specific financial assurance; and
(B) Notifies the provider of the supplemental financial assurance that BOEM will wait 7 years before cancelling all or a part of the supplemental financial assurance (or longer period as necessary to complete any appeals or judicial litigation related to your secured obligations); or
(ii) At any time when:
(A) BOEM determines, in its discretion, that you no longer need to provide the supplemental financial assurance;
(B) The operations for which the supplemental financial assurance was provided were cancelled before accrual of any decommissioning obligation; or
(C) Cancellation of the supplemental financial assurance is appropriate because, under the regulations in this part, BOEM determines such financial assurance never should have been required. |

(b) BOEM may require reinstatement of your financial assurance as if no cancellation had occurred if:

(1) A person makes a payment under the lease or grant, and the payment is rescinded or must be repaid by the recipient because the person making the payment is insolvent, bankrupt, subject to reorganization, or placed in receivership; or

(2) The responsible party represents to BOEM that it has discharged its obligations under the lease or grant, and the representation was materially false when the financial assurance was cancelled.
#### § 910.764 Process for designating areas unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.

Part 764 of this chapter, *State Processes for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* pertaining to petitioning, initial processing, hearing requirements, decisions, data base and inventory systems, public information, and regulatory responsibilities shall apply to surface coal mine operations beginning on April 9, 1983.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                             -----------------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                             -----------------------

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

          Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): May 7, 2003

                            MS Structured Asset Corp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

        Delaware                       333-64879               13-4026700
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (State or Other Jurisdiction      (Commission File         (IRS Employer
     of Incorporation)                   Number)          Identification No.)

  1585 Broadway, New York, New York                              10036
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                     (Zip Code)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

                                 Not Applicable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)


<PAGE>


Item 7.  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits

Exhibit 4.1       Trust Agreement

Exhibit 5.1       Validity Opinion of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton

Exhibit 23.1      Consent of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton
                  (included in Exhibit 5.1)



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereto duly authorized.

Date: May 13, 2003

                                  MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.
                                  (Registrant)


                                  By: /s/ John Kehoe
                                      -----------------------------------
                                  Name:  John Kehoe
                                  Title: Vice President


<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit 4.1    Trust Agreement

Exhibit 5.1    Validity Opinion of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton

Exhibit 23.1   Consent of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton
               (included in Exhibit 5.1)
SMITH COUNTY COURTHOUSE

100 N. BROADWAY 4 th Floor TYLER, TEXAS 75702 April Allison Sikes, First Assistant 

# D. Matt Bingham Criminal District Attorney Smith County TELEPHONE: (903) 535-0520 TELECOPIER: (903) 590-1719 Jennifer Barfield, Office Manager Michael J. West. Appellate Chief Ms. Pam Estes, Clerk 12 th Court of Appeals 1517 W Front St., Ste. 354 Tyler, TX 75701 November 4, 2015
RE: Roper v. State , Cause Nos. 12-15-00215-CR, 12-15-00217-CR, 12-15-00218-CR
Dear Ms. Lusk: The State acknowledges receipt of the brief filed by Appellant’s counsel pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in the above-listed cause(s). The brief presents no claims of error; therefore, the State has no points to which to respond. See T EX
. R. A

PP
. P. 38.2(a)(2). The State will not file any further response unless the Court decides that the appeal is not frivolous and orders one. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 810 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Respectfully submitted,
D. MATT BINGHAM Criminal District Attorney Smith County, Texas

_______________________ Michael J. West Assistant Criminal District Attorney SBOT# 21203300 ACCEPTED 12-15-00215-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 11/4/2015 10:02:37 AM

Pam Estes CLERKC ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the State’s acknowledgment of filing of an Anders brief was served by electronic filing on November 4, 2015, on Mr. Austin Jackson, Attorney at Law, 112 East Line, Ste. 310, Tyler, Texas 75702.

_________________________ Michael J. West Assistant Criminal District Attorney SBOT# 21203300 100 N. Broadway, 4th Fl. Tyler, Texas 75702 (903) 590-1720 (903) 590-1719 (fax) mwest@smith-county.com
#### Daniel E. Donovan, Respondent, v. James H. Vandemark, Appellant.

(Argued March 20, 1882;

decided April 11, 1882.)

This was an action of ejectment. It is reported on a former appeal in 78 N. T. 244, which decision the court say is conclusive on this appeal.

•It ivas claimed that the judgment embraces more land than was actually occupied by defendant at the time of the commencement of the action, which was simply a quarry on the land. The deed set up by defendant in his answer, under which he claimed, and introduced by him in evidence, conveyed the farm as described in the complaint. No question was raised upon the trial or request made for a finding in regard to that part in excess of the quarry. Held, that without such a finding the point was not presented by the appeal. (Grant v. Morse, 22 N. Y. 323; *Phelps*v. McDonald, 26 id, 82.)

*A. Schoonmaker*for appellant.

*John F. VanEtten*for respondent.

Danforth, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 910.815 Performance standards—coal exploration.

Part 815 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Coal Exploration,* shall apply to any person conducting coal exploration operations.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1009 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1009

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 14, 2024.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 7176) to repeal restrictions on the export 
and import of natural gas. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 1602.2 Administrative classification.

A reclassification action relating to a registrant's claim for Class 1-C, 1-D-D, 1-D-E, 1-H, 1-O-S, 1-W, 3-A-S, 4-A-A, 4-A, 4-B, 4-C, 4-F, 4-G, 4-T, or 4-W. These classes shall be identified as administrative classes.

[52 FR 24454, July 1, 1987]
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Michael T. Vea,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Michael T. Vea
------------------
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
March 19, 2003
### §3714. Use of funds for unspecified purposes or for increased amounts

#### (a) Notice to Congress of intent to use funds for unspecified purposes

#### (1) Report

For any fiscal year for which Cooperative Threat Reduction funds are specifically authorized in an Act other than an appropriations Act for specific purposes within the Program, the Secretary of Defense may obligate or expend such funds, or other funds otherwise made available for the Program for that fiscal year, for purposes other than such specified purposes if—

(A) the Secretary determines that such obligation or expenditure is necessary in the national interests of the United States;

(B) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees—

(i) notification of the intent of the Secretary to make such an obligation or expenditure of funds; and

(ii) a complete discussion of the purpose and justification for such obligation or expenditure, including the amount of funds to be obligated or expended; and

(C) a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits the notification and discussion under subparagraph (B).

#### (2) Construction with other laws

Paragraph (1) may not be construed to authorize the obligation or expenditure of Cooperative Threat Reduction Program funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under section 3731 of this title or any other provision of law.

#### (b) Limited authority to vary individual amounts provided for any fiscal year for specified purposes

For any fiscal year for which Cooperative Threat Reduction funds are specifically authorized in an Act other than an appropriations Act for specific purposes within the Program, the Secretary may obligate or expend such funds, or other funds otherwise made available for the Program for that fiscal year, in excess of the specific amount so authorized for that purpose if—

(1) the Secretary determines that such obligation or expenditure is necessary in the national interests of the United States;

(2) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees—

(A) notification of the intent of the Secretary to make such an obligation or expenditure of funds in excess of such authorized amount; and

(B) a complete discussion of the justification for exceeding such specified amounts, including the amount by which the Secretary will exceed such specified amounts; and

(3) a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits the notification and discussion under paragraph (2).

(Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, §1324, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3599; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XIII, §1302(b)(4), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2566; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title XIII, §1302(b)(2), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1705.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Subsecs. (a)(1)(C), (b)(3). Pub. L. 115–91 substituted "15 days" for "45 days".

2016—Subsecs. (a)(1)(C), (b)(3). Pub. L. 114–328 substituted "45 days" for "15 days".
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****BLM Reclamation and SustainableMineral Development Awards Program.**
 
2017 | 2018 | 2019
2020
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.2:R 24/20/
Item Number:0631 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001049414
 
March 14, 2018
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Newcastle

Yellowstone

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse RMP 

Amendments Planning Area

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

RMP Amendments Planning Area

Partuition Areas

Crucial Winter

Crucial Yearlong

Spring/Summer/Fall

Winter/Yearlong

Yearlong

Field Office Boundaries

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 18: Bighorn Sheep 

Habitat Locations
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Newcastle

Yellowstone

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse RMP

Amendments Planning Area

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

RMP Amendments Planning Area

Field Office Boundaries

Bankhead Jones

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Bureau of Land Management

Bureau of Reclamation

DOD and USACE

DOE

Fish & Wildlife

Forest Service

National Grasslands

National Park Service

Private

State

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2: Surface Ownership
§ 910.780 Surface mining permit applications—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan. ( a ) Part 780 of this chapter, *Surface Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirement for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) The application for a permit shall also demonstrate compliance with the air quality control standards in Chapter 391-3-1 of the Rules and Regulations for Air Quality Control of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources.
Exhibit 10.9.2


     Schedule of Omitted Documents in the Form of Exhibit 10.9, Including
     Material Detail in Which Such Documents Differ From Exhibit 10.9

     1.   Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2001, between the
          Company and John F. McCarthy, III.

     2.   Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2001, between the
          Company and Robert H. Donehew.

     The form of the documents listed above does not differ in material detail
from the form of exhibit 10.9 except with respect to the identity of the
director and the number of shares of common stock underlying the options. The
Stock Option Agreements relates to 40,000 shares of common stock.
#### ZIMMERMAN v. MEYROWITZ.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Charles L. Zimmerman against Emil B. Meyrowitz.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 21

- 00125

- CV

GL LOGISTICS CO., LLC,

Appellant

v.

Erika FLORES and Christian Flores

, Appellees

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CVA000265D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, t he trial court’s temporary injunction

order signed on March 16, 2021 is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellant shall pay the appellees’ costs of appeal.

SIGNED August 31 , 2021.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice