alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 842.15 Review of decision not to inspect or enforce. ( a ) Any person who is or may be adversely affected by a coal exploration or surface coal mining and reclamation operation may ask the Director or his or her designee to review informally an authorized representative's decision not to inspect or take appropriate enforcement action with respect to any violation alleged by that person in a request for Federal inspection under § 842.12. The request for review shall be in writing and include a statement of how the person is or may be adversely affected and why the decision merits review.
( b ) The Director or his or her designee shall conduct the review and inform the person, in writing, of the results of the review within 30 days of his or her receipt of the request. The person alleged to be in violation shall also be given a copy of the results of the review, except that the name of the person who is or may be adversely affected shall not be disclosed unless confidentiality has been waived or disclosure is required under the Freedom of Information Act or other Federal law.
( c ) Informal review under this section shall not affect any right to formal review under section 525 of the Act or to a citizen's suit under section 520 of the Act.
( d ) Any determination made under paragraph (b) of this section shall constitute a decision of OSM within the meaning of 43 CFR 4.1281 and shall contain a right of appeal to the Office of Hearings and Appeals in accordance with 43 CFR part 4.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00041

- CR

Shawn Leonard ELAHEE

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court a t Law No

. 2, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. CCL

- 15

- 0618

Honorable Frank Follis, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 14, 2016.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
§ 902.12 Regulatory program and proposed program amendments not approved. ( a ) We do not approve the following provisions of the proposed program amendment Alaska submitted on September 8, 2011, as revised on March 6, 2012: ( 1 ) Proposed addition of the phrase “* * * conducted on or before October 24, 1992 * * *” in 11 AAC 90.321(e)(1).
( 2 ) Proposed reduction of timeframe from 30 to 20 days to request administrative review of an agency decision regarding an incidental mining exemption under 11 AAC 90.652(g)(1),
( 3 ) Proposed deletion of the phrase “* * * until at least three years after expiration of the period during which the subject mining area is active * * *” under 11 AAC 90.656.
( 4 ) Proposed reduction of timeframe from 30 to 20 days to request administrative review of an agency decision to revoke an incidental mining exemption under 11 AAC 90.664(c).
( b ) [Reserved]
[84 FR 66308, Dec. 4, 2019]
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  Exhibit 3.5(b)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                    * * * * *


CURTIS INDUSTRIES, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors of said corporation by the unanimous
written consent of its members, filed with the minutes of the Board, adopted a
resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation:

                  RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of CURTIS
         INDUSTRIES, INC. be amended by changing the first article thereof so
         that, as amended, said article shall be and read as follows:

                           1.       The name of the corporation is:

                                            C I, INC.


         SECOND: That in lieu of a meeting and vote of stockholders, the
stockholders have given unanimous written consent to said amendment in
accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.

         THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Sections 242 and 228 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said CURTIS INDUSTRIES, INC. has caused this
certificate to be signed by John H. Fountain, its Chairman this 10th day of May,
2000.


                                           By:
                                                -----------------------
                                                    John H. Fountain

                                           Title:    Chairman
                                                -----------------------



                                       23
#### § 922.815 Performance standards—coal exploration.

Part 815 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Coal Exploration,* shall apply to any person conducting coal exploration operations.
#### § 850.10 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3507 and assigned clearance number 1029-0080. The information is being collected to meet the requirements of sections 503, 515, and 719 of Pub. L. 95-87. This information will be used by the regulatory authority to assist in implementing the blaster certification program. The obligation to respond is mandatory.
#### § 922.784 Underground mining permit applications—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan.

Part 784 of this chapter, *Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct underground mining.
TV 1 TV 6 TV 7 TV 8 TV 9 TV 11 TV 13

Screen area (in2) 686.00 1276.00 941.00 904.00 754.00 1708.00 220.00

Pon (watts) 112.77 126.53 116.77 125.30 100.60 245.86 26.92

Pon from E* data set 88.00 98.00 91.00 117.00 78.00 210.00 N/A

P0 (watts) 58.57 70.94 71.26 64.89 45.87 162.75 19.28

P10 (watts) 112.99 121.22 74.09 70.27 55.87 245.59 19.31

P30 (watts) - - - - - - - 

P40 (watts) - - - - - - - 

P100 (watts) 112.90 151.31 112.85 125.83 100.90 246.31 26.80

P150 (watts) 112.82 151.18 126.13 124.41 100.71 246.52 26.71

P300 (watts) 112.83 151.18 126.10 123.81 100.64 246.59 26.69

L0 (cd/m2) - - - - - - - 

L10 (cd/m2) - - - - - - - 

L30 (cd/m2) - - - - - - - 

L40 (cd/m2) - - - - - - - 

L100 (cd/m2) - - - - - - - 

L150 (cd/m2) - - - - - - - 

L300 (cd/m2) - - - - - - - 

The above chart is for ABC Enabled TV's. The average power is shown above during the IEC dynamic content clip at the 

N/A

-

Television On Mode Power and Luminance Measurements with ABC Enabled

 = Calculated Data

 = Raw Data

 = Not Applicable

 = No Data Available
TV C TV J TV E TV D TV K TV L TV M TV N TV A

436.0 438.0 754.0 904.0 904.0 904.0 941.0 1155.0 1155.0

84.0 42.0 117.4 196.8 65.5 85.7 80.5 166.1 127.5

65.0 36.0 92.0 99.0 48.0 64.0 63.0 139.0 112.0

42.0 28.6 61.8 103.8 28.4 43.8 37.3 115.1 71.4

83.3 28.5 62.5 104.0 65.7 43.8 81.7 115.5 91.7

83.6 30.2 62.5 107.8 66.1 45.4 79.1 121.9 93.0

84.0 38.7 74.4 109.9 66.0 48.6 80.4 137.4 92.5

83.3 42.5 86.5 130.3 65.7 67.2 81.8 165.6 91.7

83.3 42.5 91.3 130.1 65.7 70.7 81.7 165.7 119.8

83.3 46.5 90.2 130.3 65.6 85.1 81.9 166.0 127.5

41.1 128.3 93.8 232.3 28.9 72.6 18.4 165.4 92.5

296.9 128.2 97.7 234.1 236.1 72.3 285.7 169.0 266.9

296.2 141.8 130.2 240.6 235.9 87.8 282.4 186.7 266.4

296.1 202.5 158.7 246.5 236.4 113.4 283.3 226.6 266.2

296.7 238.1 230.9 283.1 236.2 221.2 284.5 301.2 266.5

298.2 246.9 247.7 300.1 236.1 316.3 283.7 301.4 266.6

298.5 258.8 233.8 298.7 236.3 363.7 283.7 302.2 266.8

dynamic content clip at the corresponding room luminance level.

 ABC Enabled
TV B TV O TV P TV G

1230.0 1293.0 1293.0 1540.0

199.2 134.8 97.9 436.0

159.0 119.0 90.0 245.8

111.0 89.3 58.8 245.8

198.4 89.0 60.0 434.8

199.3 133.8 78.2 433.3

199.8 132.7 86.2 433.4

199.2 144.0 97.8 434.8

199.0 136.7 97.9 433.8

188.3 142.7 98.0 434.7

23.3 27.0 92.4 68.2

78.9 27.1 92.0 75.0

79.7 63.7 152.4 79.7

80.2 63.3 187.5 80.9

79.0 64.4 236.1 79.7

79.2 63.4 236.3 79.7

79.1 62.7 236.7 80.2
November 18, 2015

 Exemption No. 12285A

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA−2015−1201

Mr. Luis Hernandez, Jr.

10945 Hortense Street #204

North Hollywood, CA 91602

Dear Mr. Hernandez:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated August 10, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

for an amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 

61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data 

collection. You requested an amendment to conduct closed-set motion picture and television 

filming to your operations.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. The 

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed 

and operating capabilities to those in this petition.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12285

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to add closed-set motion picture and television filming to its UAS 

operations.
2

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12285 remain in effect except 

as follows. Condition No. 2 has been updated to permit closed-set motion picture and 

television filming. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming 

are permitted. 

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
# C_2023185EN.01005101.xml

| 26.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/51

---

Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

(2023/C 185/11)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1035 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1027 (4), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 should continue to apply to those persons and entities.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 16 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 16 February 2024, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's next review, pursuant to Article 34 of Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Article 32(4) of Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.

(2)  OJ L 139, 26.5.2023, p. 49.

(3)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 139, 26.5.2023, p. 1.

---
#### § 922.707 Exemption for coal extraction incident to government-financed highway or other construction.

Part 707 of this chapter, *Exemption for Coal Extraction Incident to Government-Financed Highway or Other Construction,* shall apply to surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
### §302303. Responsibilities of State Historic Preservation Officer

(a) In General.—It shall be the responsibility of the State Historic Preservation Officer to administer the State Historic Preservation Program.

(b) Particular Responsibilities.—It shall be the responsibility of the State Historic Preservation Officer to—

(1) in cooperation with Federal and State agencies, local governments, and private organizations and individuals, direct and conduct a comprehensive statewide survey of historic property and maintain inventories of the property;

(2) identify and nominate eligible property to the National Register and otherwise administer applications for listing historic property on the National Register;

(3) prepare and implement a comprehensive statewide historic preservation plan;

(4) administer the State program of Federal assistance for historic preservation within the State;

(5) advise and assist, as appropriate, Federal and State agencies and local governments in carrying out their historic preservation responsibilities;

(6) cooperate with the Secretary, the Council, other Federal and State agencies, local governments, and private organizations and individuals to ensure that historic property is taken into consideration at all levels of planning and development;

(7) provide public information, education, and training and technical assistance in historic preservation;

(8) cooperate with local governments in the development of local historic preservation programs and assist local governments in becoming certified pursuant to chapter 3025;

(9) consult with appropriate Federal agencies in accordance with this division on—

(A) Federal undertakings that may affect historic property; and

(B) the content and sufficiency of any plans developed to protect, manage, or reduce or mitigate harm to that property; and

(10) advise and assist in the evaluation of proposals for rehabilitation projects that may qualify for Federal assistance.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3195.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302303 | 16 U.S.C. 470a(b)(3). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §101(b)(3), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 915; Pub. L. 91–383, §11, as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1942; Pub. L. 93–54, §1(d), July 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 139; Pub. L. 96–205, title VI, §608(a)(1), (2), Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 92; Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §201(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2991; Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4004(2), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4754. |

Section

In paragraph (6) of subsection (b), the word "private" is added before "organizations" for consistency with paragraph (1).
Exhibit 32

FNB UNITED CORP.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of FNB United Corp. (the Company) certify that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 23, 2011 |  | /s/ R. LARRY CAMPBELL  
|                    |  | R. Larry Campbell      
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    | 
|Dated: May 23, 2011 |  | /s/ MARK A SEVERSON    
|                    |  | Mark A. Severson       
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer



|* | This certificate is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2023190EN.01000601.xml

| 31.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/6

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1048, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1046 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2023/C 190/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1048 (2) , and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1046 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should be included on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of those persons is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 30 June 2023.

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 140 I, 30.5.2023, p. 14.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 140 I, 30.5.2023, p. 7.

---
One-Page Fact Sheet

Background

• In the 1980s, scientists observed that the ozone layer was thinning over Antarctica. People began 

thinking of this process as an “ozone hole.” 

• The ozone layer blocks harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation from reaching the Earth’s surface where it 

can harm people and ecosystems. 

• In response, leaders from many countries came together in 1987 to sign the Montreal Protocol on 

Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. 

Current Issues

• Today, more than 191 countries have signed the Montreal Protocol and the treaty has been very 

successful. The U.S. has already phased out most of the substances with the greatest potential to deplete 

the ozone layer with flexible and innovative strategies. 

o EPA is responsible for controlling chemicals that deplete the ozone layer. The U.S. has met all of 

its phase-out commitments with the help of many partners. 

o EPA has approved more than 300 alternatives to ozone-depleting substances for many industrial, 

commercial, and consumer uses. 

• Many of these new technologies also save energy and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. 

• The year 2007 marks the 20th Anniversary of the Montreal Protocol. EPA and other organizations are 

planning activities to commemorate the important achievements of the people and programs that work to 

protect the Earth’s ozone layer. 

The Future

• The ozone layer has not grown thinner since 1998, but will not return to normal levels until about 2075. 

Sustaining the recovery of the ozone layer in the future will require a worldwide phase-out of ozonedepleting substances. 

• To continue the recovery of the ozone layer, EPA plans to: 

o Complete the phase-out of ozone-depleting substances; 

o Foster domestic and international partnerships to protect the ozone layer; and 

o Encourage the development of products, technologies, and initiatives that have co-benefits in 

climate change and energy efficiency. 

• In addition, while the ozone layer is under repair, EPA plans to continue to educate the public about UV 

protection.
#### ROGERS v. CITY OF BINGHAMTON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 8, 1905.)

Action by Dorothy Louise Rogers, an infant, by John B. Rogers, her guardian ad litem, against the city of Binghamton. No opinion. Motion granted.