alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0143

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BENJAMIN EUGENE COLE JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 9, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 2 2024

02/02/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0143
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1231

DAVID L. JUDSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MATHEWS COUNTY, VIRGINIA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Mark S. Davis , Chief District Judge. ( 4:18

- cv
- 00121

- MSD

- LRL )

Submitted : September 29, 2020 Decided: November 3, 2020

Before DIAZ, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Roger S. Martin, Urbanna, Virginia, for Appellant. L. Lee Byrd, Andrew R. McRoberts, Christopher M. Mackenzie, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublish ed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM:
David L. Judson appeals the district court’s o pinion and order granting the Appellee’s motion to dismiss and dismissing his amended complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reve rsible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Judson v. Bd. of Supervisors of Mathews Cty., Va. , No. 4:18

- cv
- 00121

- MSD

- LRL (E.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contenti ons are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Motions Granted and Order filed October 18, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00904-CV

____________

IN RE VENUS FORD OF CUDAHY, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

and FORD INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL LLC 

f/k/a FORD INVESTMENT ENTERPRISES CORP., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-71227

O R D E R

On October 14, 2011, relators, Venus Ford of Cudahy, Inc., Ford Motor Company, 

and Ford International Capital LLC f/k/a Ford Investment Enterprises Corp., filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. Relators ask this court to 

order the Honorable Steven E. Kirkland, Judge of the 215th District Court of Harris

County, Texas, to set aside his October 5, 2011, discovery order, entered in trial court 

cause number 2008-71227, styled Dealer Computer Services, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company 

and Ford Investment Enterprise Corporation a/k/a FIECO. Relators claim that the trial 

court abused its discretion in requiring privileged documents to be produced.
2

Relators have also filed a motion for a temporary stay of the trial court’s discovery 

order. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. It appears from the facts stated in the petition 

that relators’ request for relief requires further consideration and that relators will be 

prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. 

We therefore GRANT relators’ motion and ORDER the trial court’s October 5, 

2011, discovery order in trial court cause number 2008-71227, styled Dealer Computer 

Services, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Ford Investment Enterprise Corporation a/k/a 

FIECO, STAYED until a final decision by this court on relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus, or until further order of this court. Relators’ motion for leave to file the 

documents that are claimed to be privileged for in cameral inspection is also GRANTED.

In addition, the court requests the real party in interest, Dealer Computer Services, 

Inc., to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before November 2, 

2011.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher.
) •I"\:::·

. " 

### SERVED: MARCH 20, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF 

### TRANS NORTH AVIATION, LTD.

FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2013-0046

ORDERDENYING COMPLAINANT'S MOTION ComplainantFederal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has moved that the Request for Hearing filed by Respondent TransNorthAviation, Ltd. ("Respondent") be denied as untimely. 14 C.F.R. §13.16(g)(2)(ii) obligates a person chargedwith a violationto request a hearing not laterthan 15 days following receipt ofComplainant's final notice ofproposed civil penalty ("FNPCP"). The basis for Complainant's motion is that Respondent's request was submitted afterthe 15-day period had expired. · Respondent's reply objecting to Complainant's motion asserts that it filed a Request for Hearing in a timely manner. Complainant'stimeline contending that Respondent failed to do so is flawed because its presumptionthat Respondent received the FNPCP onJanuary 17, 2013 is incorrect, Respondent contends. Citing the regulation statingthat service may bepresumed when theparty·"acknowledges receipt ofthe document" (14 C.F.R. §13.211(h)), Respondent asserts that Complainant cannot showthat Respondent acknowledged receipt onJanuary 17. Complainant has furnished no return receipt supporting its motion. Further, Respondenthas filed an affidavit withits response stating that itneitherreceived nor signed a return receipt 

### ]Q2 acknowledgement ("green card") on that date. Respondent further states that it acknowledged receipt ofthe FNPCP onFebruary 2, 2013, within the time frame required by the regulation for mailing its request for hearing. The foregoing demonstrates that Respondent has observedthe rules. Itfiled its Request for Hearing in a timely manner. As such, Complainant's motion is denied, and Respondent's Request for Hearing is accepted.

# ~-i£.4Jl (!)

# l~u;~ ,@x 'Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment

- Service List

### 3

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### Charles R. Barnett.III, Respondent's Counsel 

### Barnett & Borth, LLC 800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 Glenview, IL 60025 TEL: 847-809-9520 FAX: 815-356-7042 Jeanette B. Daubaras, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Great Lakes Region Federal Aviation Administration 2300 EastDevon Avenue Des Plaines, AL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7313 FAX: 847-294-7498 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0046 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### § 77.1102 Warning signs; smoking and open flame.

Signs warning against smoking and open flames shall be posted so they can be readily seen in areas or places where fire or explosion hazards exist.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ImClone Systems Incorporated (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John H. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter R. Borzilleri, Interim Vice President,
Finance of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: February 29, 2008 | /s/JOHN H. JOHNSONJohn H. Johnson Chief Executive Officer                
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 29, 2008 | /s/PETER R. BORZILLERIPeter R. Borzilleri Interim Vice President, Finance

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 3, 2011 |   /s/ John M. Lowber         |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                   | John M. Lowber                    |
|                   | Secretary, Treasurer and Director |
|                   | GCI, Inc.                         |

----
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-06-251-CR

MATTHEW ABRAHAM MARTINEZ	       					APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                                 ----------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On May 11, 2007 we received appellant’s request for an extension of time to file an amended motion to dismiss the appeal in response to our letter dated May 3, 2007.  The motion is GRANTED.

	On May 15, 2007 we received “Appellant’s First Amended Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Direct Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 				 														

										PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: June 7, 2007
###### Editorial Note on Part 785

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 54965, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 785 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93379-93381, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 785.2 Objective.

The objective of this part is to ensure that permits are issued for certain categories of surface coal mining and reclamation operations only after the regulatory authority receives information that shows that these operations will be conducted according to the applicable requirements of the Act, subchapter K, and applicable regulatory programs.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9905 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9905

To make supplemental appropriations for disaster relief in response to 
               Hurricane Helene, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2024

  Mr. Moskowitz (for himself, Mrs. Luna, and Ms. Williams of Georgia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make supplemental appropriations for disaster relief in response to 
               Hurricane Helene, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR DISASTER RELIEF RELATED TO 
              HURRICANE HELENE.

    In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is appropriated, 
out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated--
            (1) $10,000,000,000 to the Administrator of the Federal 
        Emergency Management Agency to provide assistance under the 
        Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 
        (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) in response to Hurricane Helene; and
            (2) $5,000,000,000 to the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
        Development to provide assistance under title I of the Housing 
        and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) 
        related to disaster relief for Hurricane Helene.
                                 <all>
```
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Newcastle

Yellowstone

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse RMP 

Amendments Planning Area

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

RMP Amendments Planning Area

Bear

Big Horn

Cheyenne

Great Divide-Upper Green

Great Salt Lake

Missouri-Little Missouri

Niobrara

North Platte

Powder-Tongue

South Platte

Upper Snake

White-Yampa

Field Office Boundaries

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Major Streams

Cities

Map 12: Watersheds and 

Surface Water Features
### §524. Evasion of regulation of motor carriers

A person, or an officer, employee, or agent of that person, that by any means tries to evade regulation of motor carriers under this chapter, chapter 51, subchapter III of chapter 311 (except sections 31138 and 31139) or section 31302, 31303, 31304, 31305(b), 31310(g)(1)(A), or 31502 of this title, or a regulation issued under any of those provisions, shall be fined at least $2,000 but not more than $5,000 for the first violation and at least $2,500 but not more than $7,500 for a subsequent violation.

(Pub. L. 97–449, §1(b), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2437; Pub. L. 112–141, div. C, title II, §32505(a), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 804.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 524 | 49:1655(f)(2). | Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, §6(f)(2), 80 Stat. 940. |

Section

The section is included because 49:1655(f)(2) gave the same administrative powers exercised by the Interstate Commerce Commission under certain sections of title 49 to the Secretary of Transportation to carry out duties transferred to the Secretary by 49:1655(e). See the revision notes for section 501 of the revised title for an explanation of the transfer under 49:1655(f)(2). The powers of the Commission have been codified in subtitle IV of the revised title. The comparable provisions of title 49 that are represented by the section may be found as follows:

| Section 524 | 49 U.S. Code | Revised Section |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 322(c) (related to evasion of regulation). | 11906 |

See the revision notes for the revised section for an explanation of changes made in the text. Changes not accounted for in those revision notes are as follows:

The section does not apply to motor carriers of migrant workers and motor private carriers because 49:322(c) (related to evasion of regulation) only applies to motor carriers and 49:304(a)(3) and (3a) do not apply 49:322(c) (related to evasion of regulation) to motor carriers of migrant workers and motor private carriers.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2012—Pub. L. 112–141 struck out "knowingly and willfully" after "by any means", inserted ", chapter 51, subchapter III of chapter 311 (except sections 31138 and 31139) or section 31302, 31303, 31304, 31305(b), 31310(g)(1)(A), or 31502 of this title, or a regulation issued under any of those provisions," after "this chapter", and substituted "$2,000 but not more than $5,000" for "$200 but not more than $500" and "$2,500 but not more than $7,500" for "$250 but not more than $2,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2012 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–141 effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of Title 23, Highways.
Exhibit 23.1

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

General Communication, Inc. 

|   | Board of Directors |
|--------|--------------------|

 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8  (No. 333-117783) of our report dated June 26, 2007 with respect to the statements of net assets available for benefits of General Communication, Inc. Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related statements of changes in net assets available for benefits for the years then ended and the supplemental schedule of assets (held at end of year) and supplemental schedule of reportable transactions, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 11-K of General Communication, Inc. Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

 

/signed/ KPMG LLP

Anchorage, Alaska

June 26, 2007
§ 903.800 Bond and insurance requirements for surface coal mining and reclamation operations under regulatory programs. ( a ) Part 800 of this chapter, *Bond and Insurance Requirements for Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations Under Regulatory Programs,* applies to all surface coal mining and reclamation operations, except for § 800.40(a)(1) of this chapter regarding the bond release application, for which paragraph (b) of this section substitutes.
( b ) The permittee may file an application with the regulatory authority for the release of all or part of a performance bond. The application must be filed no later than 30 days before the end of the vegetation growing season in order to allow time for the regulatory authority to properly evaluate the completed reclamation operations. The appropriate times or seasons for the evaluation of certain types of reclamation shall be identified in the mining and reclamation plan required in subchapter G of this chapter and approved by the regulatory authority.
### SUBCHAPTER III—VOLUNTARY TRANSFERS OF LEAVE
From: Bob Smith [mailto:bsmith@federalpacific.com]  

Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 3:42 PM

To: Brian Coffey

Cc: Michael Rivest; 'Richard Parker'; Rob Greeson

Subject: Template Questions

Brian:

1. Why are you not showing the BIL ratings for the liquid filled?

2. For DL 13a and DL 13b the HV of 24940 on distribution systems is 125 KV BIL,  not 150 KV BIL.  

Should we not report our designs at 125 KV BIL?

3. The voltage of 34,500 for Ventilated dry distribution transformers is indeed 150 KV BIL but is

very rarely purchased and almost never in KVA ratings less than 2000 KVA.

What would you like to do?

Thanks,

Bob Smith, PE

Product Manager

Federal Pacific

601 Old Airport Road

Bristol, VA 24201  

  

TEL:  (276) 645‐8836

FAX: (276) 645‐8212

CELL: (276) 591‐6143
Email: bsmith@federalpacific.com

The information contained in this message and any attachments is intended only for the use of the

individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential

and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, you are

prohibited from copying, distributing, or using the information. Please contact the sender immediately

by return e‐mail and completely delete the original message from your system.
#### § 939.764 Process for designating areas unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.

Part 764 of this chapter, *State Processes for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* pertaining to petitioning, initial processing, hearing requirements, decisions, data base and inventory systems, public information, and regulatory responsibilities shall become applicable in Rhode Island on May 28, 1983.
### §§576 to 581. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 576, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 113, classified types of courts-martial. See section 816 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 577, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 114, related to jurisdiction of courts-martial in general. See section 817 of Title 10.

Section 578, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 114, related to jurisdiction of general courts-martial. See section 818 of Title 10.

Section 579, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 114, related to jurisdiction of special courts-martial. See section 819 of Title 10.

Section 580, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 114, related to jurisdiction of summary courts-martial. See section 820 of Title 10.

Section 581, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1, 64 Stat. 115, provided that jurisdiction of courts-martial was not exclusive. See section 821 of Title 10.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1957, see act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53 footnote, 70A Stat. 680.