alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Map 2-18: Proposed Plan

Areas Closed to Mineral Material Disposal

Related to Greater Sage Grouse Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

USFS Proposed Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

USFS Proposed Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

Closed to Mineral Material Disposal

Federal Salable Mineral Estate

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: Identified restrictions displayed on this map

are in addition to existing restrictions already

approved through previous planning efforts.
#### CLANCY v. YONKERS R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 20, 1903.)

1. Appeal—Negligence—Sufficiency of Evidence.

Judgment for plaintiff in an action for injury from the starting of a street car while she was alighting after it had been stopped on her signal will be reversed as against the weight of evidence, she having no witness, and four apparently disinterested witnesses, besides the conductor and motorman, testifying that, after plaintiff had asked the conductor to stop the car, she, disregarding his warning, alighted while it was in motion, and before it had stopped.

Appeal from City Court of Yonkers.

Action by Maria Clancy against the Yonkers Railroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiff and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before GOODRICH, P. J., and BARTLETT, JENKS, WOODWARD, and HOOKER, JJ.

B. H. Ames (Charles F. Brown and Arthur Ofner, on the brief), for appellant.

Thomas F. Curran, for respondent.

JENKS, J.

I think that the judgment should be reversed, on the ground that it is against the weight or preponderance of evidence. The plaintiff complains that she signaled the defendant’s conductor to stop the car, which was done, and that while alighting therefrom the car was negligently started, so that she was cast into the street. Her case rests solely upon her testimony. She also testifies that she knew many by sight upon the car, but none by name, and that she subsequently called upon Mr. Earl, Mrs. Evans, and Mr. Chasin about the accident. But she called none of these persons to the witness stand. On the contrary, they were all witnesses for the defendant. Aside from the testimony of the conductor and the motorman, that of four apparently disinterested witnesses, who were passengers on the car, is to the effect that, after the plaintiff had asked the conductor to stop the car, and while it was yet in motion, heedless of the com*790mand or warning of the conductor, she alighted before it had stopped. Under her pleading the plaintiff must base any recovery upon the negligent starting of the car after it had been stopped upon her signal. Upon this record, she has not successfully borne the burden cast upon her, and we should direct the submission of the case to another jury. McDonald v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 167 N. Y. 66, 70, 60 N. E. 282; Kaare v. T. S. & I. Co., 139 N. Y. 369, 34 N. E. 901; Wolf v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 81 N. Y. Supp. 257; Hogan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, 71 App. Div. 614, 75 N. Y. Supp. 845; Colvin v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 32 App. Div. 76, 52 N. Y. Supp. 698.

The judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial granted; costs to abide the event. All concur.
§ 57.5065 Fueling practices. ( a ) Diesel fuel used to power equipment in underground areas must not have a sulfur content greater than 0.05 percent. The operator must retain purchase records that demonstrate compliance with this requirement for one year after the date of purchase.
( b ) The operator must only use fuel additives registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in diesel powered equipment operated in underground areas.
[66 FR 5907, Jan. 19, 2001; 66 FR 35520, July 5, 2001]
#### § 946.11 Conditions of State regulatory program approval.

The approval of the Virginia State program is subject to the State revising its program to correct the deficiencies listed in this section. The program revisions may be made, as appropriate, to the statute, the regulations, the program narrative, or the Attorney General's opinion. This section indicates, for the general guidance of the State, the component of the program to which the Secretary recommends the change be made.

[46 FR 61114, Dec. 15, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 31550, July 21, 1982; 47 FR 55678, Dec. 13, 1982; 48 FR 25186, June 6, 1983; 48 FR 46031, Nov. 11, 1983; 49 FR 19478, May 8, 1984]
### §307103. Access to information

(a) Authority To Withhold From Disclosure.—The head of a Federal agency, or other public official receiving grant assistance pursuant to this division, after consultation with the Secretary, shall withhold from disclosure to the public information about the location, character, or ownership of a historic property if the Secretary and the agency determine that disclosure may—

(1) cause a significant invasion of privacy;

(2) risk harm to the historic property; or

(3) impede the use of a traditional religious site by practitioners.

(b) Access Determination.—When the head of a Federal agency or other public official determines that information should be withheld from the public pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary, in consultation with the Federal agency head or official, shall determine who may have access to the information for the purpose of carrying out this division.

(c) Consultation With Council.—When information described in subsection (a) has been developed in the course of an agency's compliance with section 306107 or 306108 of this title, the Secretary shall consult with the Council in reaching determinations under subsections (a) and (b).

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3231.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 307103 | 16 U.S.C. 470w–3. | Pub. L. 89–665, title III, §304, as added Pub. L. 96–515, title V, §501, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3002; Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4020, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4765. |

Section
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         DIAPULSE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
                                   FORM 10-QSB
                 FOR THE QUARTER PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Item 7.  Certifications

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 C.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diapulse, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 C.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
         the Company.


         By: /s/ Jesse Ross                             November 14, 2005
             -----------------------------
             Jesse Ross
             Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER IV—FOREIGN GIFTS AND DECORATIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1967—Pub. L. 90–83, §1(45)(A), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 208, substituted "FOREIGN GIFTS AND DECORATIONS" for "FOREIGN DECORATIONS" in subchapter heading.
(January 24, 1961)

#### Leo Lehmann, by Irwin Lehmann, Administrator of the Estate of Leo Lehmann, Deceased, Respondent, v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 84358)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Improving Oxygen Delivery.                    

*Date:*                         January 22, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Giuseppe Pintucci, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 205-H, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7969,                         *Pintuccig@nhlbi.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 18, 2020.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-28530 Filed 12-23-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §302910. Recordkeeping

A recipient of assistance under this division shall keep—

(1) such records as the Secretary shall prescribe, including records that fully disclose—

(A) the disposition by the recipient of the proceeds of the assistance;

(B) the total cost of the project or undertaking in connection with which the assistance is given or used; and

(C) the amount and nature of that portion of the cost of the project or undertaking supplied by other sources; and

(2) such other records as will facilitate an effective audit.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3205.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302910 | 16 U.S.C. 470e. | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §105, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 917. |

Section

The word "recipient" is substituted for "beneficiary" for clarity.
§ 77.1905 Hoist safeguards; general. ( a ) Hoists used to transport persons shall be equipped with brakes capable of stopping and holding the cage, bucket, platform, or other device when fully loaded.
( b ) When persons are transported by a hoist, a second person familiar with and qualified to stop the hoist shall be in attendance, except where the hoist is fully equipped with overspeed, overwind, and automatic stop devices.
Hulett

Sundance

Newcastle

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM. 

0 5 10 20

Miles

0 10 20 5

Kilometers

o

Wyoming Sage-grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

Map 3-10: Livestock Grazing Allotments 

Thunder Basin National Grasslands

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Thunder Basin National Grassland

Grazing Allotments

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities
Exhibit 32


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of GPS Industries, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify,
to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



                                                  /s/ ROBERT C. SILZER, SR.
Date:  November 19, 2003                     By:  ___________________________
                                                  Robert C. Silzer, Sr.
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1007 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit certain resolutions to be privileged only if they are based on conduct which was 

the subject of an investigation and report by the appropriate committee 

of jurisdiction or if they are offered by direction of a party caucus 

or conference. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2024 

Ms. PORTER (for herself, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Mrs. RAMIREZ, and Ms. 

WILLIAMS of Georgia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

permit certain resolutions to be privileged only if they 

are based on conduct which was the subject of an investigation and report by the appropriate committee of jurisdiction or if they are offered by direction of a party 

caucus or conference. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON PRIVILEGED STATUS OF CER3 TAIN RESOLUTIONS. 

4 Rule IX of the Rules of the House of Representatives 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1007 IH 

1 ‘‘3.(a) A resolution described in paragraph (b) shall 

2 not raise a question of privilege for purposes of this rule 

3 unless— 

4 ‘‘(1) the committee to whom the resolution is 

5 referred has conducted an investigation and filed a 

6 report recommending that the House impose the 

7 sanction provided by the resolution; or 

8 ‘‘(2) the resolution is offered by direction of a 

9 party caucus or conference. 

10 ‘‘(b) A resolution described in this paragraph is— 

11 ‘‘(1) a resolution impeaching an officer of the 

12 Government; or 

13 ‘‘(2) a resolution to censure, reprimand, or 

14 expel a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commis15 sioner or to cause a vacancy to occur in the office 

16 of the Speaker or in the position of a chair or rank17 ing minority member of a committee.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Linda Alster, Appellant, v Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, P.C., Respondent.

[835 NYS2d 294]

In an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged fee-sharing agreement, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered January 13, 2006, as denied her motion for summary judgment on the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In opposition to the plaintiffs prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the defendant raised triable issues of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). The conflicting affidavits submitted by the parties reveal the existence of triable issues of fact with respect to whether there existed a fee-sharing agreement that was sufficiently certain and specific as to be enforceable, or an unenforceable agreement to agree *(see Stockland Martel, Inc. v Donald J. Pliner of Fla., Inc.,*32 AD3d 779, 782 [2006]; *Maffea v Ippolito,*247 AD2d 366, 367 [1998]). The issues of whether there was an enforceable agreement to share attorneys’ fees, and, if so, the nature of the terms of the agreement, are issues triable by a jury *(see Matter of Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Firm v Danzig,*248 AD2d 178, 179 [1998]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the complaint. Miller, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Lifson, JJ, concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tiffani Scott, Appellant.

[834 NYS2d 226]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered September 27, 2005, convicting her of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as a felony, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s written waiver of her right to appeal was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary *(see People v Ramos,*7 NY3d 737 [2006]) and, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the fact that the waiver was given in exchange for the dismissal of two other criminal charges did not make it the product of coer*571cion *(cf. People v Page,*12 AD3d 622, 623 [2004], *cert denied*545 US 1132 [2005]; *People v Bonton,*7 AD3d 634 [2004]). Accordingly, the defendant validly waived appellate review of her claim that her sentence was excessive *(see People v Lococo,*92 NY2d 825 [1998]; *People v Bevins,*27 AD3d 572, 573 [2006]). Moreover, except to the extent that the alleged ineffectiveness of her counsel may have affected the voluntariness of her plea, appellate review of the defendant’s challenge to her counsel’s effectiveness is similarly precluded by her waiver *(see People v Demosthene,*2 AD3d 874 [2003]; *People v Herring,*274 AD2d 525 [2000]; *People v Porter,*268 AD2d 603 [2000]). Insofar as the defendant contends that the voluntariness of her plea was affected by the alleged ineffective assistance of her counsel, that contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Deale,*29 AD3d 602 [2006]; *People v Catts,*26 AD3d 341 [2006]; *People v Aguirre,*304 AD2d 771 [2003]). In any event, the voluntariness of the defendant’s plea was not affected by the alleged ineffectiveness of her attorney. Finally, the defendant’s contention that her plea of guilty was not knowing, intelligent, or voluntary because she was on medication at the time of the plea is unpreserved for appellate review inasmuch as she did not move to withdraw her plea *(see People v Brooks,*36 AD3d 929 [2007]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher, Lifson and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Map 2-23: Proposed Plan

Areas Withdrawn from Mineral Entry

Related to Greater Sage Grouse Habitat

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

Boundary

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit

Boundaries

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

USFS Proposed Priority Habitat

Management Area (Core)

USFS Proposed Priority Habitat

Management Area (Connectivity)

Withdrawn from Mineral Entry

Recommended for Withdrawal from

Mineral Entry

Considered for Proposed Withdrawal

from Mineral Entry

Federal Locatable Mineral Estate

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Note: Identified restrictions displayed on this map

are in addition to existing restrictions already

approved through previous planning efforts.