alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

**Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Leonard F. Leganza, the Chief Executive Officer of The Eastern Company (the “Company”) and John L. Sullivan III, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

| 1) | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period ended September 27, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 28th day of October, 2008.

 

|   | /s/ Leonard F. Leganza    |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Leonard F. Leganza

CEO   |
|   |                      |
|   | /s/ John L. Sullivan III  |
|   | John L. Sullivan III

CFO |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Eastern Company and will be retained by The Eastern Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
§ 937.700 Oregon Federal program. ( a ) This part contains all rules that are applicable to surface coal mining operations in Oregon which have been adopted under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.
( b ) The rules in this part cross-reference pertinent parts of the permanent program regulations in this chapter. The full text of a rule is in the permanent program rule cited under the relevant section of the Oregon Federal program.
( c ) The rules in this part apply to all surface coal mining operations in Oregon conducted on non-Federal and non-Indian lands. The rules in Subchapter D of this chapter apply to operations on Federal lands in Oregon.
( d ) The information collection requirements contained in this part do not require approval by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3507 because there are fewer than ten respondents annually.
( e ) The following provisions of Oregon laws provide, where applicable, for more stringent environmental control and regulation of surface coal mining operations than do the provisions of the Act and the regulations in this chapter. Therefore, pursuant to Section 505(b) of the Act, they shall not be construed to be inconsistent with the Act: ( 1 ) Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 468.700-468.997, pertaining to the control of water pollution.
( 2 ) ORS 498.002 and ORS 498.705, protecting fish and wildlife and their habitats.
( 3 ) ORS 509.125, prohibiting deleterious substances from being introduced into State waters.
( 4 ) ORS 509.140, requiring the approval of the Fish and Wildlife Commission before explosives may be used to construct a dam or similar structure.
( 5 ) ORS 509.600, prohibiting the injury or destruction of fish within 600 feet of any fishway. Prior approval of the Director, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, is required before constructing a dam or obstruction in State waters.
( 6 ) ORS 509.615, requiring that artificial watercourses must be screened.
( f ) The following are Oregon laws that interfere with the achievement of the purposes and requirements of the Act and are, in accordance with section 504(g) of the Act, pre-empted and superseded with respect to coal mining, except to the extent they provide for regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations which are exempt from the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977: ( 1 ) Oregon Surface Mining and Mine Land Reclamation Act, as amended, ORS 517.750-ORS 517.990.
( 2 ) Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR), Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Division 30, Rules and Regulations, Oregon Mined Land Reclamation Act, OAR 632-30-005 through OAR 632-30-060.
( 3 ) ORS 273.551 and ORS 273.775 to ORS 273.790. The contractual and leasing responsibility of the Division of Lands over State lands and minerals is not affected by this Federal program.
( 4 ) ORS 275.340. Pre-empted to the extent that the State of Oregon construes this statute as delegating to cities and counties the authority to issue surface coal mining permits and related exploration permits.
[47 FR 49822, Nov. 2, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 13812, Apr. 24, 1987]
### §1265. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1257, title III, §328, 68 Stat. 1163, which provided for retention of officers to complete 20 years of service.
#### § 910.828 Special performance standards—in situ processing.

Part 828 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—In Situ Processing,* shall apply to any person who conducts in situ processing activities.
§ 903.701 General. ( a ) Sections 700.5, 700.11, 700.12, 700.13, 700.14, 700.15 and part 701 of this chapter apply to coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations in Arizona.
( b ) Beginning on May 12, 1995, each surface coal mining and reclamation operation in Arizona must comply with Subchapter B of this chapter until issuance of a permanent program permit under the provisions of Subchapter C of this chapter.
( c ) Records required by § 700.14 of this chapter to be made available locally to the public shall be made available in the county recorder's office of the county in which an operation is located, and at the OSM Albuquerque Field Office.
### §2144. Payments from CIARDS fund for portions of certain Civil Service Retirement System annuities

The amount of the increase in any annuity that results from the application of section 3518 of this title, if and when such increase is based on an individual's overseas service as an employee of the Central Intelligence Agency, shall be paid from the fund.

(Pub. L. 88–643, title II, §295, as added Pub. L. 102–496, title VIII, §802, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3242.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 295 of Pub. L. 88–643, as added Pub. L. 101–193, title III, §307(b), Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1707, related to payments from CIARDS fund for portions of certain Civil Service Retirement System annuities and was set out as a note under section 403 of this title prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 88–643 by section 802 of Pub. L. 102–496.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of fourth month beginning after Oct. 24, 1992, see section 805 of Pub. L. 102–496, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
### §410. Special provisions concerning the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(a) Delegation.—The Chairman of the Commission may delegate the authority specified in the 2d sentence of section 403(a) of this title to another member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, but shall not delegate such authority to any other officer or employee of the Commission.

(b) Personnel.—Notwithstanding paragraphs (7) and (8) of section 406(a) of this title, the Inspector General of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is authorized to select, appoint, and employ such officers and employees as may be necessary for carrying out the functions, powers, and duties of the Office of Inspector General and to obtain the temporary or intermittent services of experts or consultants or an organization of experts or consultants, subject to the applicable laws and regulations that govern such selections, appointments, and employment, and the obtaining of such services, within the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

(Pub. L. 117–286, §3(b), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4228.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 410 | 5 U.S.C. App. (IGA §8B) | Pub. L. 95–452, §8B, as added Pub. L. 100–504, title I, §102(f), Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2517. |

Section
§ 77.805 Cable couplers and connection boxes; minimum design requirements. ( a ) ( 1 ) Couplers that are used in medium- or high-voltage power circuits shall be of the three-phase type and enclosed in a full metallic shell, except that the Secretary may permit, under such guidelines as he may prescribe, no less effective couplers constructed of materials other than metal.
( 2 ) Cable couplers shall be adequate for the intended current and voltage.
( 3 ) Cable couplers with any metal exposed shall be grounded to the ground conductor in the cable.
( 4 ) Couplers shall be constructed to cause the ground check continuity conductor to break first and the ground conductor last when being uncoupled when pilot check circuits are used.
( b ) Cable connection boxes shall be of substantial construction and designed to guard all energized parts from personal contact.
Appeal No. 76-245.

#### Elizabeth A. Smith *v.*Harold R. Smith.

*Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Alfred Factor,*for petitioner.

*John D. Lynch,*for respondent.

The respondent’s motion for a stay is denied.
### §300315. Preservation or historic preservation

In this division, the term "preservation" or "historic preservation" includes—

(1) identification, evaluation, recordation, documentation, curation, acquisition, protection, management, rehabilitation, restoration, stabilization, maintenance, research, interpretation, and conservation;

(2) education and training regarding the foregoing activities; or

(3) any combination of the foregoing activities.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3190.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 300315 | 16 U.S.C. 470w(8). | Pub. L. 89–665, title III, §301(8), as added Pub. L. 96–515, title V, §501, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3001; Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4019(a)(6), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4764. |

Section
M. P. No. 76-463.

#### Pull-Channel TV, Inc. *v.*Archie Smith *et al.*

*David B. Lovell, Jr.,*for petitioner. *Harold W. Demopulos,*for Newport Cable TV, Inc.

*Tobin, LeRoy & Silverstein, Max Wistow, Merrill W. Sherman,*for Plantations CATV Co., Inc.

*George C. Berk,*for Cable Television of Rhode Island, Inc.

*Charles J. McGovern,*for Vision Cable Company of Rhode Island, Inc.

Petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the writ shall issue forthwith.
# C_2023060EN.01000901.xml

| 17.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/9

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
  )

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 60/07)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2023) 882 | 10 February 2023 | Chromium trioxide
  EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0 | Steel Color S.p.A., Via Per Pieve Terzagni 15, 26033 Pescarolo Ed Uniti (CR), Italy | REACH/23/1/0 | As a colouring and hardening agent for stainless steel plates applied in the steel industry for the manufacture of cold-rolled, high quality textured sheet metal | 31 December 2028 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2023) 882

10 February 2023

Chromium trioxide

EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0

Steel Color S.p.A., Via Per Pieve Terzagni 15, 26033 Pescarolo Ed Uniti (CR), Italy

REACH/23/1/0

As a colouring and hardening agent for stainless steel plates applied in the steel industry for the manufacture of cold-rolled, high quality textured sheet metal

31 December 2028

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 15.6


                       [DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP LETTERHEAD]




DTE Energy Company and 
The Detroit Edison Company 
Detroit, Michigan

We have made reviews, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of DTE Energy Company and subsidiary companies and of The Detroit
Edison Company and subsidiary companies for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 1997 and 1996, as indicated in our report dated
October 27, 1997. Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion
on that information. 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997, is
incorporated by reference in the following Registration Statements:


                                                REGISTRATION 
                FORM                            NUMBER

                DTE Energy Company
                Form S-3                        33-57545
                Form S-8                        333-00023

                The Detroit Edison Company
                Form S-3                        33-53207
                Form S-3                        33-64296

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement which is prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared
or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that 
Act.



Deloitte & Touche LLP

October 27, 1997
§ 942.762 Criteria for designating areas as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations. ( a ) Part 762 of this chapter, *Criteria for Designating Areas as Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations,* shall apply to surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) In addition to the lands defined as fragile lands in § 762.5 of this chapter, the Office in evaluating any petition to designate lands as unsuitable or to terminate such designation will consider lands included on the Tennessee Natural Areas Registry under Tennessee Code Annotated (TCA) section 11-14-112, Natural Areas designated by the Tennessee General Assembly under TCA 11-14-108, areas adjoining Tennessee Scenic Rivers designated under TCA 11-13-101, and Scenic Trails designated under TCA 11-11-101.
#### Ester Jones, Individually and as Legal Parent and Guardian of M.W.R.-J., Respondent, v Cheektowaga-Maryvale Union Free School District, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 421]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Gerald J. Whalen, J.), entered April 5, 2006. The order, among other things, granted plaintiffs application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Gorski, J.P, Lunn, Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ.
# C_2013071EN.01001902.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/19

---

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2013 — La Navale v Commission

(Case T-263/00) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and requiring the recovery of aid paid - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 71/30

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: La Navale Soc. coop. rl (Venice, Italy) (represented by: A. Vianello, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Italian Republic (initially represented by: U. Leanza, then by I. Braguglia, then by R. Adam, and finally by I. Bruni, Agents, assisted by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance;

| 2. | The action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law;

| 3. | La Navale Soc. coop. rl shall bear the Commission’s costs in addition to its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

La Navale Soc. coop. rl shall bear the Commission’s costs in addition to its own costs;

| 4. | The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 9.12.2000.

1

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Lithofacies, depositionalenvironments, and regional stratigraphy of the lower Eocene Ghazij Formation,Balochistan, Pakistan**
 
Report | Plate One | Plate Two
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1599
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001054142
 
April 24, 2018
#### Rocco Mastrella, Appellant, v. Jule H. Miles et al., Respondents.

Motion granted to prosecute appeal on typewritten records and briefs.
### §306106. Review of plans of transferees of surplus federally owned historic property

The Secretary shall review and approve the plans of transferees of surplus federally owned historic property not later than 90 days after receipt of the plans to ensure that the prehistorical, historical, architectural, or culturally significant values will be preserved or enhanced.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3226.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 306106 | 16 U.S.C. 470h–2(e). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §110(e), as added Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §206, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2996. |

Section
### SUBCHAPTER IV—REEMPLOYMENT AFTER SERVICE WITH AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
## PART IV—ETHICS REQUIREMENTS

Chap.
Sec.
131.
Ethics in Government
13101
§ 921.843 Federal enforcement. ( a ) Part 843 of this chapter, *Federal Enforcement,* shall apply when enforcement action is required for violations on exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
( b ) The Office will furnish a copy of any enforcement document to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management upon request.
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 20 40 80

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Closed to leasing of non-energy solid minerals

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Sage-grouse Priority/Core Habitat Areas

Sage-grouse Connectivity Habitat Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2-27: Alternative D

Areas Closed to Non-energy

Solid Leasable Minerals
§ 935.16 Required regulatory program amendments. ( a ) By December 18, 2015, Ohio shall amend its program, or provide a written description of an amendment together with a timetable for enactment which is consistent with established administrative or legislative procedures in the State, to require permit applications to list all unabated “violation notices”, as that term is defined in the Ohio approved program.
( b ) [Reserved]
[80 FR 63125, Oct. 19, 2015]