alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Paleozoic-Mesozoic boundary in the Berry Creek Quadrangle, northwestern Sierra Nevada, California

By: Anna Martta Hietanen

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1027

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 910.761 Areas designated unsuitable for surface coal mining by Act of Congress.

Part 761 of this chapter, *Areas Designated by Act of Congress,* shall apply to surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Closed to Mineral Materials

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Sage-grouse Priority/Core Habitat Areas

Sage-grouse Connectivity Habitat Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2-17: Alternative D

Areas Closed to Mineral Materials
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 USC SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 9, 2007
    /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.Anthony F. Earley, Jr.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The
Detroit Edison Company  28
# C_2023340EN.01000301.xml

| 27.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11206 – BROOKFIELD / OTPP / COMPASS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 340/03)

On 20 September 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11206. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11206. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
July 5, 1977.

Appeal No. 76-148.

#### Country Fresh Co., Inc. *v.*Joseph and Mary Taglione.

This ease is assigned to the calendar for October, 1977 for oral argument.

Defendants will be expected to show cause wherein the trial justice abused his discretion in finding (1) that the lease was not defaulted for late payment of rent in view of the general principle that a payment, which the payee has directed to be made by mail, is complete when posted, *Laredo Hides Co., Inc.*v. *H & H Meat Products Co., Inc.,*513 S.W.2d 210 (Tex. Civ. App. 1974), *Norskog*v. *Atha,*61 Ohio L.Abs. 604, 102 N.E.2d 907 (1951); and, in finding, (2) that the 20-foot parking strip, and the residential apartment on the second floor of the building which the parking strip was designed to support, were both *957excluded from the lease and were both included in the option to purchase. *Fisk*v. *Brayman,*21 R.I. 195, 42 A. 878 (1899).

*David J. Kehoe,*for petitioner.

*Joseph T. Pari,*for defendant.

Appeal No. 77-154. Joseph T. Drury, *Admin, v.*William Drury and Janice Ruggieri. Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss defendants’ appeal is denied as moot. *Dominick A. St. Angelo,*for petitioner. *David W. Carroll,*for defendant.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-12-00372- CV In re G reg D aniels ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Relator has filed a motion for temporar y relief and a petition for writ of mandamus. We deny the motion and the petition for wr it of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8, 52.10.

__________________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and He nson Filed: June 4, 2012
#### § 916.25 Approval of Kansas abandoned mine land reclamation plan amendments.

The following is a list of the dates amendments were submitted to OSM, the dates when the Director's decision approving all, or portions of these amendments, were published in the Federal Register and the State citations or a brief description of each amendment. The amendments in this table are listed in order of the date of final publication in the Federal Register.

| Original amendment submission date | Date of final publication | Citation/description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| April 29, 1988 | October 5, 1988 | Reorganization of the Regulatory Authority. House Bill 3009 eliminated the Kansas Mined Land Conservation and Reclamation Board and transferred its functions and staff to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. |
| September 30, 1988 | January 10, 1989 | Approval of emergency reclamation program. |
| June 29 and July 26, 1989 | November 30, 1989 | KAR 47-16-1, -16-2, -16-4 through -8; policy and procedures for project ranking and selection; organization structure; public participation. |
| October 25, 1991 | April 13, 1992 | KAR 47-16-5(b), -6. |
| May 7, 1997 | March 3, 1998 | K.A.R. 47-16-1 through 47-16-11. |
| March 17, 1998 | June 8, 1998 | Section 884.13(c)(2) and (d)(3). |
| July 24, 2002 | March 25, 2003 | K.A.R. 47-16-9(a), 47-16-10(b), and 47-16-12. |
| February 23, 2016 | May 9, 2019 | Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan for the State of Kansas. |

[62 FR 9941, Mar. 5, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 10317, Mar. 3, 1998; 63 FR 31112, June 8, 1998; 68 FR 14326, Mar. 25, 2003; 84 FR 20264, May 9, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000764579
<NAME> CAS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,190,345
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,055,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        725,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,153,686
<PP&E>                                           1,106,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                     874,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,393,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              807,603
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            37,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         788,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,393,539
<SALES>                                          6,620,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,901,176
<CGS>                                            2,826,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,501,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   519,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (75,706)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,129,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                       464,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                665,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       665,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .07


</TABLE>
#### Alex Reck v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted on consent, without costs. . Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
#### TYLER, Respondent, v. SOPER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 8, 1905.)

Action by Leman W. Tyler against Orange Soper. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 10.1


                            SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


The American Corporation Escrow Account
c/o Thomas Prousalis, P.L.L.C.
1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 200
Washington, D.C. 20006

     Re: Prospectus, dated              , 2002.

Gentlemen:

     The undersigned investor ("Investor") in this Subscription Agreement
("Agreement") hereby acknowledges receipt of the Prospectus ("Prospectus"),
dated             , 2002, of The American Corporation ("AMERICAN"), a Delaware
corporation, and subscribes for the following number of units upon the terms
and conditions set forth in the Prospectus. Investor represents that the
undersigned is a financially sophisticated and an accredited investor and,
as such, is capable of bearing the substantial economic risks associated with
a purchase and investment in the highly speculative securities of AMERICAN,
including total loss. The Investor agrees that this Agreement is subject to
acceptance by AMERICAN, to availability and to certain other conditions.

     The undersigned hereby subscribes for         units of AMERICAN'S
securities at $5.25 per unit, for an aggregate purchase price of $            .
Enclosed is the undersigned's check made payable to the "Riggs Bank, N.A./The
American Corporation Escrow Account" and has been forwarded to AMERICAN'S
escrow account in the self-addressed stamped envelope that has been provided
for convenience.


                                   ACCEPTED AND AGREED:



                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Signature of Investor



                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Print Full Name



                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Street Address



                                   --------------------------------------------
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:               City, State, Zip            Telephone Number
THE AMERICAN CORPORATION



By:
    ----------------------------
    Randall F. Greene              WIRING INSTRUCTIONS:
    CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD          The American Corporation Escrow Account
                                   Riggs Bank, N.A.
                                   Washington, D.C. 20006
                                   ABA No. 054000030
                                   Account No. 25438594
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 21, 2009

p0114 

# Order

January 21, 2009

137525

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137525 COA: 278587 Wayne CC: 07-007009-01 LAJUAN ZACHARY SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInfluence of Thin-Film Adhesives in Pullout Tests Between Nickel-Titanium Shape Memory Alloy and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix CompositesStrips of nickel-titanium (NiTi) shape memory alloy (SMA) and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite (PMC) were bonded together using multiple thin film adhesives and their mechanical strengths were evaluated under pullout test configuration. Tensile and lap shear tests were conducted to confirm the deformation of SMAs at room temperature and to evaluate the adhesive strength between the NiTi strips and the PMC. Optical and scanning electron microscopy techniques were used to examine the interfacial bonding after failure. Simple equations on composite tensile elongation were used to fit the experimental data on tensile properties. ABAQUS models were generated to show the effects of enhanced bond strength and the distribution of stress in SMA and PMC. The results revealed that the addition of thin film adhesives increased the average adhesive strength between SMA and PMC while halting the room temperature shape memory effect within the pullout specimen.Document ID20180001850Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsQuade, Derek J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Jana, Sadhan*(Akron Univ. Akron, OH, United States)*McCorkle, Linda S.*(Ohio Aerospace Inst. Brook Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 9, 2018Publication DateFebruary 1, 2018Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN46662NASA/TM-2018-219747E-19464Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 826611.04.03.01CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC13BA10BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsPolymer Matrix CompositesShape Memory AlloysAvailable DownloadsNameType20180001850.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 90.102 Transfer; notice. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28483 , Apr. 18, 2024.
The following is required until April 14, 2025: ( a ) Whenever a part 90 miner is transferred in order to meet the applicable standard, the operator shall transfer the miner to an existing position at the same coal mine on the same shift or shift rotation on which the miner was employed immediately before the transfer. The operator may transfer a part 90 miner to a different coal mine, a newly-created position or a position on a different shift or shift rotation if the miner agrees in writing to the transfer. The requirements of this paragraph do not apply when the respirable dust concentration in a part 90 miner's work position complies with the applicable standard but circumstances, such as reductions in workforce or changes in operational status, require a change in the miner's job or shift assignment.
( b ) On or before the 20th calendar day following receipt of notification from MSHA that a part 90 miner is employed at the mine, the operator shall give the District Manager written notice of the occupation and, if applicable, the MMU unit to which the part 90 miner shall be assigned on the 21st calendar day following receipt of the notification from MSHA.
( c ) After the 20th calendar day following receipt of notification from MSHA that a part 90 miner is employed at the mine, the operator shall give the District Manager written notice before any transfer of a part 90 miner. This notice shall include the scheduled date of the transfer.
[79 FR 24989, May 1, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 28482, Apr. 18, 2024]
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0353 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2008 - SW - 029 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








As the independent registered public accountants of The First Bancorp, Inc., we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-175722) on Form S-3 and the registration statement (No. 333-167014) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 12, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, which report appears in the December 31, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of The First Bancorp, Inc.








/s/ Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC


Portland, Maine


December 1, 2015
#### § 77.213 Draw-off tunnel escapeways.

When it is necessary for a tunnel to be closed at one end, an escapeway not less than 30 inches in diameter (or of the equivalent, if the escapeway does not have a circular cross section) shall be installed which extends from the closed end of the tunnel to a safe location on the surface; and, if the escapeway is inclined more than 30 degrees from the horizontal it shall be equipped with a ladder which runs the full length of the inclined portion of the escapeway.