alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered August 10, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00672
- CV
IN RE PURSUIT OF EXC ELLENCE, INC., PURSU IT OF EXCELLENCE TEX AS, LLC,

MARIE DIAZ, C. JOHN S CHEEF, ANNA S. BROOK S, AND BRANDY K. CHAMBE RS, Rela t ors O rigina l Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 08581



### O RDER Before the Court is real party in interest Ruth Torres’ motion for free appe llate record

. She asks this Court to order the district court clerk and the court reporter to prepare a free appellate record consisting of the transcripts of six hearings. We DENY the motion. Torres has filed a “Statement of Inability to Afford Paymen t o f Court Costs or an Appeal Bond ” in this original proceeding. Pursuant to Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure 20.1(a) and
20.1 (c), Torres is , therefore, allowed to proceed without payment of the appellate court filing fees. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1(a), (c). However, fees charged by the trial court clerk or court reporter for preparation of the appellate record , if necessary, are governed by Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1(a) ; T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145

. Tor r es has not shown that R ule 145 proceedings have occurred in the court below and does not seek relief from an orderrequiring Torres to pay for the requested transcripts

. Accordingly, we deny the motion without

prejudice to Torres pursuing available remedies under Rule 145.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2011 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





Date: December 1, 2015








/s/F. Stephen Ward


F. Stephen Ward


Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.10.2


                         ADDENDUM II TO LEASE AGREEMENT

                                  July 1, 1997

WHEREAS:   Sedona GeoServices, Inc. ("Tenant"), entered into a Lease Agreement
           with Lewis Road Associates, a Pennsylvania Partnership, ("Landlord"),
           dated July 1, 1996.

WHEREAS:   The existing Lease Agreement comprises 2793 square feet, labeled
           suite #220 plus 3,734 square feet on the southwest corner of the
           second floor, labeled suite #210.

WHEREAS:   The Tenant is desirous of leasing additional office space in the
           building on the Southeast corner of the second floor comprising of
           5091 square feet labeled suite #250.

WHEREAS:   The rent for the additional space shall be $15.00 for the period
           7/1/97 - 6/30/98, which is the same rate as stated in the original
           lease agreement.

WHEREAS:   The second full year lease term will continue at $15.00 per square
           foot, which includes both Base Rent and Common Area Costs for the
           period 7/1/98 - 9/30/99(which expires at the same date as the
           original lease agreement). When multiplied by the square feet of
           space will yield a monthly rental rate of $6,363.75.


THEREFORE: Intending to be legally bound, Tenant and Landlord agree to the above
           terms and conditions. All rights contained in the Original Lease
           Agreement will apply to this Addendum and its related space.

           The Landlord is including a $5,000 fit out allowance to the Tenant
           which may be used towards the space refurbishment or may be used as a
           deduction off of the first months rental.


<PAGE>


Addendum to Lease
July 1, 1997
Page Two

/S/ Julie E. Evans               /S/ Gregory A. Dinnocenti
------------------               ----------------------------------------
WITNESS                          LANDLORD
                                 GREGORY A. DINNOCENTI

/S/ Shirley Miller               /S/ L.L. Osterwise for AE Trolio 6/19/97
------------------               ----------------------------------------
WITNESS                          TENANT
                                 ANDREW E. TROLIO
                                 SEDONA-GEOSERVICES, INC.
#### § 937.823 Special performance standards—operations on prime farmland.

Part 823 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Operations on Prime Farmland,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations on prime farmlands.
### §20511. Criminal penalties

A person, including an election official, who in any election for Federal office—

(1) knowingly and willfully intimidates, threatens, or coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any person for—

(A) registering to vote, or voting, or attempting to register or vote;

(B) urging or aiding any person to register to vote, to vote, or to attempt to register or vote; or

(C) exercising any right under this chapter; or

(2) knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process, by—

(A) the procurement or submission of voter registration applications that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held; or

(B) the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held,

shall be fined in accordance with title 18 (which fines shall be paid into the general fund of the Treasury, miscellaneous receipts (pursuant to section 3302 of title 31), notwithstanding any other law), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(Pub. L. 103–31, §12, May 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 88.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1973gg–10 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 745.1 Scope.

This part sets forth requirements for the development, approval and administration of cooperative agreements under section 523(c) of the Act.
### §171a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 2, 1917, ch. 35, §2, as added Mar. 27, 1942, ch. 199, title II, §201, 56 Stat. 177, related to acquisition of real property during war, and terminated on Dec. 28, 1945 by act Mar. 27, 1942, ch. 199, title II, §202, as added Dec. 28, 1945, ch. 590, §1(a), 59 Stat. 658.
No. 8403.

#### Swart, Admx., *v.*The Huron Dock Co., et al.

(Decided January 19, 1904.)

Error to Circuit Court of Erie county.

*Mr. C. A. Thatcher*and *Mr. W. B. Btarbird,*for plaintiff in error,

*Messrs. Wickham & Wickham,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of *Busby*v. *Finn,*1 Ohio St., 409, the map and blue print being filed with the bill of exceptions and so described as to» *575leave no doubt of their identity, and the same are therefore held to be a part of the bill of exceptions.

Burket, O. J., Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew,, JJ., concur.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Currency, and Housing, 1975-1977					 and 	Ninety-Fourth Congress, 1975-1977. 						*Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence : Staff Report for the Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, Ninety-Fourth Congress, Second Session*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										August 1976,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1058,			accessed on September 7, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1130

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

MCDONALD’S CORPORATION,

Defendant.

No. 15-1131

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-1132

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,
2

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. 

(8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv-03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02890-RWT)

Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rungrudee Suteerachanon, Appellant Pro Se. Nigel F. Telman, Amanda 

C. Wiley, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Alex Chad 

Weinstein, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the district court’s orders 

dismissing her employment discrimination actions and denying her 

motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Suteerachanon v. 

McDonald’s Rest. of Md., Inc., Nos. 8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02890-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 24, 2014 & Jan. 9, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1605.8 Staff of Region Headquarters for Selective Service. ( a ) Subject to applicable law, and within the limits of available funds, the staff of each region for Selective Service shall consist of as many officers, either military or civilian, as shall be authorized by the Director of Selective Service.
( b ) In accordance with limitations imposed by the Director of Selective Service, the Region Manager is authorized to appoint such civilian personnel as he considers are required in the operation of the Region Headquarters.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 17, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30096

Summary Calendar

MOUSTAPHA SACKO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(2:05-CV-264)

_________________________________________________________________

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Moustapha Sacko, an immigration detainee, filed a 28 U.S.C. §

2241 petition in which he challenged his pre-removal detention by

the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He now appeals

the district court’s holding he failed to demonstrate there was no

reasonable likelihood of removal in the foreseeable future.

According to Sacko, his continued detention beyond six months

violates the rule from Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). 
-2-

It appears the district court did not err in concluding Sacko

hampered the Government’s efforts to remove him. We need not reach

that issue, however. Instead, we note the district court ordered

the Government to obtain travel documents from Burundi within six

months. That period has now passed, rendering moot any dispute

over the rationale for the district court’s order of continued

detention. Therefore, we vacate and remand to the district court

to determine whether, given the current status of the case, “there

is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably

foreseeable future”. Id. at 701; see also Gul v. Rozos, 163 F.

App’x 317 (5th Cir. 2006).

VACATED AND REMANDED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0024 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FELIPE AGUSTIN TORRES ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 8, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 21 2020

12/21/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0024
### §403–4b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 403–4b, comprising section 1011(c) of the National Security Intelligence Reform Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–458, title I, and also of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–458, was editorially reclassified as section 3506a of this title.
§ 1605.54 Jurisdiction. The local board shall have full authority to perform all acts within its jurisdiction authorized by law, to include the acting on any claim presented to it when: ( a ) The claim is submitted by a registrant who is assigned to it; or
( b ) The claim is transferred to it from another board in the manner provided in these regulations; or
( c ) The claim is submitted or tranferred to it by the Director of Selective Service to assure the fair and equitable administration of the Law.
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Newcastle

Yellowstone

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse RMP 

Amendments Planning Area

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

RMP Amendments Planning Area

Areas of Environmental Concern (ACEC)

Other Management Areas (OMA)

Wilderness Study Areas (WSA)

Field Office Boundaries

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 7: Special Designations 

and Management Areas
#### § 769.12 Where to submit petitions.

Each petition to have an area of Federal lands designated as unsuitable or to terminate an existing designation shall be submitted to the Director of the OSM Field Office responsible for that area where the Federal lands are located.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Longs Drug Stores Corporation
(the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 27, 2005 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 11, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    WARREN F.
BRYANT                                                         
|                     |  |  |  | Warren F. Bryant Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer                
|                     |  | 
|Date: April 11, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    STEVEN F.
MCCANN                                                         
|                     |  |  |  | Steven F. McCann Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Longs Drug Stores Corporation and will be retained by Longs Drug Stores Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Federal student aid for adultstudents.**
 
2011 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:ED 1.2:ST 9/31/
Item Number:0455-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001050980
 
March 27, 2018
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. DAVIS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 16, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Henry G. Davis.

No opinion. Motion granted.
### §§172, 173. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section 172, act July 9, 1918, ch. 143, subch. XV §8, 40 Stat. 888, related to acquisition of property for production of lumber. See section 2665 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 173, act Apr. 28, 1904, ch. 1762, §1, 33 Stat. 497, related to purchase of land for quarters and barracks in addition to sites for fortifications.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Regional hydrology andsimulation of flow of stratified-drift aquifers in the glaciated northeasternUnited States**
 
Report
Plates:One | Two | Three
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1415-C
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001051614
 
April 3, 2018
#### § 947.828 Special performance standards—in situ processing.

Part 828 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—In Situ Processing,* shall apply to any person who conducts in situ processing activities.
October 15, 2015

Mr. Richard Gage

Allen Associates Inc.

7114 East Earll Drive

Scottsdale, AZ 85251

Dear Mr. Gage:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your June 17, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Allen Associates Inc. filed in 

Docket No. FAA−2015−3173, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
#### § 77.701 Grounding metallic frames, casings, and other enclosures of electric equipment.

Metallic frames, casings, and other enclosures of electric equipment that can become “alive” through failure of insulation or by contact with energized parts shall be grounded by methods approved by an authorized representative of the Secretary.