alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9923 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

505 East 9th Avenue in Amarillo, Texas, as the ‘‘Mayor Jerry H. 

Hodge Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2024 

Mr. JACKSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 505 East 9th Avenue in Amarillo, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Mayor Jerry H. Hodge Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAYOR JERRY H. HODGE POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 505 East 9th Avenue in Ama7 rillo, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Mayor 

8 Jerry H. Hodge Post Office Building’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9923 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mayor Jerry H. 

5 Hodge Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                             415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,774
<INVENTORY>                                      2,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,718
<PP&E>                                          13,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,052
<BONDS>                                         62,106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         27
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,950
<SALES>                                         67,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,353
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,594
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    907
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                907
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>
#### § 147.33 Additional requirements by agencies.

Temporary eligibility for access must satisfy these minimum investigative standards, but agency heads may establish additional requirements based on the sensitivity of the particular, identified categories of classified information necessary to perform the lawful and authorized functions that are the basis for granting temporary eligibility for access. However, no additional requirements shall exceed the common standards for background investigations developed under section 3.2(b) of Executive Order 12968. Temporary eligibility for access is valid only at the agency granting it and at other agencies who expressly agree to accept it and acknowledge understanding of its investigative basis. It is further subject to limitations specified in sections 2.4(d) and 3.3 of Executive Order 12968, *Access to Classified Information.*
#### Eleanor Cloke, Respondent, v. Hotel Roosevelt Corporation, Appellant.

Determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the City Court in favor of plaintiff unanimously reversed on the law and the facts and complaint dismissed, with costs to the appellant. The evidence fails to show any defect or dangerous condition in regard to the stairway on which plaintiff fell. Plaintiff relies on a combination of lighting and identical floor covering which allegedly obscured a step and induced the illusion of a level, unbroken surface. The area was adequately lighted, and plaintiff was familiar with the premises and well aware of the existence and location of the stairs. Settle order on notice. Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
### §§31 to 39. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862

Section 31, acts June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title I, §1, 40 Stat. 217; Mar. 28, 1940, ch. 72, title I, §1, 54 Stat. 79, related to unlawful obtaining or permitting to be obtained information affecting national defense. See section 793 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Section 32, act June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title I, §2, 40 Stat. 218, related to unlawful disclosures affecting national defense. See section 794 of Title 18.

Section 33, act June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title I, §3, 40 Stat. 219, related to seditious or disloyal acts or words in time of war. See section 2388 of Title 18. Section 33 was amended by act May 16, 1918, ch. 75, §1, 40 Stat. 553, which was repealed and the original section reenacted by act Mar. 3, 1921, ch. 136, 41 Stat. 1359.

Section 34, act June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title I, §4, 40 Stat. 219, related to conspiracy to violate sections 32 and 33 of this title. See sections 794 and 2388 of Title 18.

Section 35, acts June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title I, §5, 40 Stat. 219; Mar. 28, 1940, ch. 72, §2, 54 Stat. 79, related to the harboring or concealing of violators of the law. See sections 792 and 2388 of Title 18.

Section 36, act June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title I, §6, 40 Stat. 219, related to designation by proclamation of prohibited areas. See section 793 of Title 18.

Section 37, act June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title I, §8, 40 Stat. 219, related to places subject to provisions of sections 31 to 42 of this title. See section 2388 of Title 18.

Section 38, act June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title I, §7, 40 Stat. 219, related to jurisdiction of courts-martial and military commissions.

Section 39, act June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title XIII, §2, 40 Stat. 231; Proc. No. 2695, eff. July 4, 1946, 11 F.R. 7517, 60 Stat. 1352, related to jurisdiction of Canal Zone courts over offenses on high seas. See section 3241 of Title 18.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of sections 31 to 39 effective Sept. 1, 1948, see section 38 of act June 25, 1948, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 1 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inforetech Wireless Technology,  Inc.
(the  Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert C. Silzer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/Robert C. Silzer

Robert C. Silzer
Chief Executive Officer
May 20, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7898

THOMAS EARL GREENE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER MEDICAL

DEPARTMENT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CA-04-22330-6-13AK)

Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 9, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Earl Greene, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Earl Greene appeals the district court’s order

accepting and adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint for failure to state a claim and failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. The district court referred this case to

a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000).

The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised

Greene that failure to timely file specific, written objections to

this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district

court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning,

Greene failed to file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s

recommendation. Greene’s filed objections were entirely general

and conclusory. 

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See

Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Greene has waived appellate

review by failing to file objections with any specificity after

receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of

the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
- 3 -

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
The Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-60935) and Form S-8
(File No.  333-43363 and File No.  333-77109)  of our report dated  February 28,
2000,  on our audits of the  consolidated  financial  statements  of The Peoples
BancTrust  Company,  Inc. as of  December  31, 1999 and 1998 and for each of the
three years in the period ended  December 31, 1999 which report is  incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
--------------------------

Birmingham, Alabama
March 29, 2000
Exhibit 12

       John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries
      Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                    (thousands of dollars)

                                Six Months Ended April 30,
                               ------------------------------
                                   2000               1999
                               -----------        -----------
Earnings:

Income before income
  taxes and changes
  in accounting                   $104,491           $112,558
Fixed charges                      205,927            180,842
                               -----------        -----------
  Total Earnings                  $310,418           $293,400

Fixed charges:

Interest expense                  $202,626           $178,363

Rent Expense                         3,301              2,479
                               -----------        -----------
  Total fixed
    Charges                       $205,927           $180,842
                               ===========        ===========

Ratio of earnings to
   Fixed charges*                     1.51               1.62
                               ===========        ===========


                          For the Years Ended October 31,
                  --------------------------------------------
                    1999     1998     1997     1996     1995
                  -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Earnings:

Income before
  income taxes
  and changes
  in accounting   $235,760 $233,534 $211,251 $206,588 $175,360

Fixed charges      366,102  373,237  330,648  276,726  240,913
                  -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
  Total Earnings  $601,862 $606,771 $541,899 $483,314 $416,273
                  ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Fixed charges:

Interest expense  $360,925 $368,381 $326,867 $273,748 $238,445

Rent Expense         5,177    4,856    3,782    2,978    2,468
                  -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
  Total fixed
    charges       $366,102 $373,237 $330,649 $276,726 $240,913
                  ======== ======== ======== ======== ========

Ratio of earnings
   to fixed
   charges*           1.64     1.63    1.64      1.75     1.73
                  ======== ======== ======== ======== ========

_______
"Earnings" consist of income before income taxes, the
cumulative effect of changes in accounting and fixed charges.
"Fixed charges" consist of interest on indebtedness,
amortization of debt discount and expense, an estimated amount
of rental expense under capitalized leases which is deemed to
be representative of the interest factor and rental expense
under operating leases.

* The Company has not issued preferred stock.  Therefore, the
  ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred
  stock dividends are the same as the ratios presented above.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE STATE-
MENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE BALANCE SHEET
AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,507
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,359
<INVENTORY>                                      2,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,211
<PP&E>                                         755,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                 383,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 434,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,455
<BONDS>                                        101,177
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       118,442
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   434,671
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,072
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,072
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,199
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,199
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 77.1202 Availability of mine map.

The mine map maintained in accordance with the provisions of § 77.1200 shall be available for inspection by the Secretary or his authorized representative.
PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-F

~ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PLATE 7
zUSGS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Wiener chor ye yan, shea) Ue Sate

EXPLANATION unos,

é ESTIMATED BLOCK-AVERAGED HEAD—
Based on measurements from four or more -
wells per block issu Ai

—300— LINE OF EQUAL SIMULATED FRESHWATER
HYDRAULIC HEAD—Interval, in feet, is
variable. Datum is sea level

Seal DEPTH-AVERAGED DISSOLVED-SOLIDS
CONCENTRATION—Equal to 10,000

: am —

NW iy

36°

milligrams per liter

---—-— DEPTH-AVERAGED DISSOLVED-SOLIDS 92° a
CONCENTRATION—Eaual to 35,000 ie
milligrams per liter

Model boundary

LOUISIANA.
Downdip limit

ot

Edge of Continental Shelf

0 50 100 150 MILES
1
Base from U.S. Geological Survey 0 50 100 150 KILOMETERS

Scale 1:2,500,000

PLATE 7I. Estimated block-averaged and simulated 1982 freshwater hydraulic head:
Layer 3, middle Wilcox aquifer.

By
Alex K. Williamson and Hayes F. Grubb
2001
Discussion Questions from BCSE for July 9, 2014 Meeting

 The proposed Clean Power Plan sets an interim target for states for 2020 -2029, but gives states the flexibility to determine the actual trajectory of emissions reductions in this period. Does this me an states could, for example, delay taking action in the initial years of the compliance period and concentrate their reductions in the second half of the window if they wanted to? Or, will the EPA be looking for states to demonstrate progress throughout the period?  How is existing renewable energy and energy efficiency accounted for and/or eligible for com pliance?  Wh en can crediting begin for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects? There is some confusion about whether projects can start being credited in 2017.  How are energy imports and interstate activities considered in the proposed Clean Power Plan?  How did EPA factor in the natural gas generation increases (Building Block 2), did it consider infrastructure needs and/or market rules on a state or regional basis?  Wh at has the reaction been to th e Clean Power Plan from other critical stakeholders and what are the key

issues or questions that you are being asked?
EXHIBIT 31.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles M. Moche, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Tangent Solutions, Inc.
(the "Company");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this annual report is being prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and

6. The Company's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 31, 2003

/s/ Charles M. Moche
-----------------------
Charles M. Moche
Chief Financial Officer