# Arrêt du Tribunal

1..
: Acts of the institutions – Choice of legal basis – Action on several legal bases – Inadequacy of certain legal bases relied on – Not relevant where there are no adverse consequences for the addressee of the act

2..
: Competition – Maritime transport – Regulation No 4056/86 – Horizontal price-fixing agreements between the members of a liner conference and independent companies – Prohibition – Inapplicability of the block exemption in favour of such agreements entered into by the members of a liner conference

3..
: Competition – Administrative procedure – Observance of the rights of the defence – Statement of objections – Necessary content

4..
: Competition – Administrative procedure – Observance of the rights of the defence – Whether the parties involved have a right to express an opinion regarding the way in which their own arguments have been taken
  into account – No such right

5..
: Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Adverse effect on competition – Agreement between shipping companies prohibiting the grant of discount on published rates for charges and surcharges – Anti-competitive object and appreciable effect – Intention to restrict competition and effective application of the agreement – Irrelevant

6..
: Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Definition – Measures affecting a particular legal situation – Action directed solely against the statement of reasons for a measure – Whether admissible

7..
: Competition – Administrative procedure – Decision finding that there has been an infringement – Obligation to define the relevant market – Scope

8..
: Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Agreements between undertakings – Effect on trade between Member States – Criteria – Insignificant effect on market – Agreement not prohibited

9..
: Competition – Transport – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Prohibition – Exemption – Cumulative conditions for grant – Effect on the obligation to define the relevant markets

10..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria defined in the Commission Guidelines – Applicability to infringements of the competition rules in the transport sector

11..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Commission's discretion – Judicial review – Unlimited jurisdiction – Effect

12..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Calculation method set out in the Commission's Guidelines – Commission decision to apply that method in a particular case – Consequences – Obligation to state reasons in respect of all infringements

13..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Duration of the infringements – Agreement penalised because of its anti-competitive object regardless of its effects – Consideration of the duration of the agreement without regard to its non-application

14..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Gravity of the infringements – Mitigating circumstances – Non-application of the agreement – Consideration of that mitigating circumstance when assessing the gravity of the infringement – Whether permissible

15..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Cooperation by the undertaking during the administrative procedure – Definition

16..
: Competition – Administrative procedure – Commission's obligations – Requirement to act within a reasonable time

17..
: Competition – Administrative procedure – Limitation period for fines – Exclusive application of Regulation No 2988/74 – Inapplicability of factors connected to the requirement to act within a reasonable period

18..
: Competition – Fines – Imposition – Condition that the undertaking derive a benefit from the infringement – No such condition

19..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Financial situation of the undertaking concerned – May be taken into consideration – Whether obligatory – No such obligation

20..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Gravity of the infringements – Mitigating circumstances – Whether Commission obliged to abide by its previous decision-making practice – No such obligation

21..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Division of an overall amount between different groups of undertakings formed on the basis of the size of the activity of
  the undertakings committing the infringement in the sector concerned – Whether permissible – Conditions

22..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Gravity of the infringement – Assessment on the basis of the total turnover of the undertaking – Whether permissible – Consideration of the individual role of each undertaking

23..
: Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Gravity of the infringement – Assessment in the light of the economic situation at the time when the infringement was committed

24..
: Competition – Administrative procedure – Limitation periods in proceedings – Interruption – Request for information – Condition – Need for the existence of a connection between the information requested and the infringement under investigation

1.
:

2.
:

3.
:

4.
:

5.
:

6.
:

7.
:

8.
:

9.
:

10.
:

11.
:

12.
:

13.
:

14.
:

15.
:

16.
:

17.
:

18.
:

19.
:

20.
:

21.
:

22.
:

23.
:

24.
:

«(Competition – Agreement between members of a liner conference and independent shipping companies – Charges and surcharges – Legal basis – Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 – Regulation (EEC) No 1017/68 – Relevant market – Proof of infringement – Limitation period – Fine)»

| | Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), 19 March 2003 |
| --- | --- |

Summary of the Judgment

1..
  Acts of the institutions – Choice of legal basis – Action on several legal bases – Inadequacy of certain legal bases relied on – Not relevant where there are no adverse consequences for the addressee of the act

2..
  Competition – Maritime transport – Regulation No 4056/86 – Horizontal price-fixing agreements between the members of a liner conference and independent companies – Prohibition – Inapplicability of the block exemption in favour of such agreements entered into by the members of a liner conference (Art. 81(1)(a) EC; Council Regulations No 1017/68, Art. 2(a), and No 4056/86, Art. 3)

3..
  Competition – Administrative procedure – Observance of the rights of the defence – Statement of objections – Necessary content (Council Regulations No 17, Art. 19(1), No 1017/68, Art. 26(1), and No 4056/86, Art. 23(1))

4..
  Competition – Administrative procedure – Observance of the rights of the defence – Whether the parties involved have a right to express an opinion regarding the way in which their own arguments have been taken
  into account – No such right

5..
  Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Adverse effect on competition – Agreement between shipping companies prohibiting the grant of discount on published rates for charges and surcharges – Anti-competitive object and appreciable effect – Intention to restrict competition and effective application of the agreement – Irrelevant (Art. 81(1)(a) EC; Council Regulation No 1017/68, Art. 2(a))

6..
  Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Definition – Measures affecting a particular legal situation – Action directed solely against the statement of reasons for a measure – Whether admissible (Art. 230 EC)

7..
  Competition – Administrative procedure – Decision finding that there has been an infringement – Obligation to define the relevant market – Scope (Art. 81 EC)

8..
  Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Agreements between undertakings – Effect on trade between Member States – Criteria – Insignificant effect on market – Agreement not prohibited (Art. 81(1) EC)

9..
  Competition – Transport – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Prohibition – Exemption – Cumulative conditions for grant – Effect on the obligation to define the relevant markets (Art. 81(3) EC; Council Regulation No 1017/68, Art. 5)

10..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria defined in the Commission Guidelines – Applicability to infringements of the competition rules in the transport sector (ECSC Treaty, Art. 65(5); Council Regulations No 17, Art. 15(2), No 1017/68, Art. 22(2), and No 4056/86, Art. 19(2))

11..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Commission's discretion – Judicial review – Unlimited jurisdiction – Effect (Art. 229 EC; Council Regulations No 17, Art. 17, No 1017/68, Art. 24, and No 4056/86, Art. 21)

12..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Calculation method set out in the Commission's Guidelines – Commission decision to apply that method in a particular case – Consequences – Obligation to state reasons in respect of all infringements (ECSC Treaty, Art. 65(5); Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2))

13..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Duration of the infringements – Agreement penalised because of its anti-competitive object regardless of its effects – Consideration of the duration of the agreement without regard to its non-application (Council Regulations No 17, Art. 15(2), No 1017/68, Art. 22(2), and No 4056/86, Art. 19(2))

14..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Gravity of the infringements – Mitigating circumstances – Non-application of the agreement – Consideration of that mitigating circumstance when assessing the gravity of the infringement – Whether permissible (ECSC Treaty, Art. 65(5); Council Regulations No 17, Art. 15(2), No 1017/68, Art. 22(2), and No 4056/86, Art. 19(2))

15..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Cooperation by the undertaking during the administrative procedure – Definition (Council Regulation No 17, Art. 11(4) and (5))

16..
  Competition – Administrative procedure – Commission's obligations – Requirement to act within a reasonable time (Council Regulations No 17, No 1017/68 and No 4056/86)

17..
  Competition – Administrative procedure – Limitation period for fines – Exclusive application of Regulation No 2988/74 – Inapplicability of factors connected to the requirement to act within a reasonable period (Council Regulation No 2988/74, Art. 2(1) and (3))

18..
  Competition – Fines – Imposition – Condition that the undertaking derive a benefit from the infringement – No such condition (ECSC Treaty, Art. 65(5); Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2))

19..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Financial situation of the undertaking concerned – May be taken into consideration – Whether obligatory – No such obligation (Council Regulations No 17, Art. 15(2), No 1017/68, Art. 22(2), and No 4056/86, Art. 19(2))

20..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Gravity of the infringements – Mitigating circumstances – Whether Commission obliged to abide by its previous decision-making practice – No such obligation (Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15)

21..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Division of an overall amount between different groups of undertakings formed on the basis of the size of the activity of
  the undertakings committing the infringement in the sector concerned – Whether permissible – Conditions
  (Council Regulations No 17, Art. 15(2), No 1017/68, Art. 22(2), and No 4056/86, Art. 19(2))

22..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Gravity of the infringement – Assessment on the basis of the total turnover of the undertaking – Whether permissible – Consideration of the individual role of each undertaking (Council Regulations No 17, Art. 15(2), No 1017/68, Art. 22(2), and No 4056/86, Art. 19(2))

23..
  Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Gravity of the infringement – Assessment in the light of the economic situation at the time when the infringement was committed (Art. 81(1) EC; Council Regulations No 17, Art. 15(2), No 1017/68, Art. 22(2), and No 4056/86, Art. 19(2))

24..
  Competition – Administrative procedure – Limitation periods in proceedings – Interruption – Request for information – Condition – Need for the existence of a connection between the information requested and the infringement under investigation (Council Regulations No 17, Art. 11(1), No 1017/68, Art. 19, No 2988/74, Arts. 1(1)(b) and 2(1)(a) and (3), and No 4056/86,
  Art. 16)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber)19 March 2003 (1)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber)19 March 2003 (1)

((Competition – Agreement between members of a liner conference and independent shipping companies – Charges and surcharges – Legal basis – Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 – Regulation (EEC) No 1017/68 – Relevant market – Proof of infringement – Limitation period – Fine))

applicants,

v

defendant,

gives the following

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

─
:

On those grounds,

Jaeger

Lenaerts

Azizi

H. Jung

K. Lenaerts

Registrar

President

---

1 –

  Language of the case: English.

1 –
: Language of the case: English.