alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.523-2 Deenergization of self-propelled electric face equipment; performance requirements. ( a ) Deenergization of the tramming motors of self-propelled electric face equipment, required by paragraph (a) of § 75.523-1, shall be provided by: ( 1 ) Mechanical actuation of an existing pushbutton emergency stopswitch,
( 2 ) Mechanical actuation of an existing lever emergency stopswitch, or
( 3 ) The addition of a separate electromechanical switch assembly.
( b ) The existing emergency stopswitch or additional switch assembly shall be actuated by a bar or lever which shall extend a sufficient distance in each direction to permit quick deenergization of the tramming motors of self-propelled electric face equipment from all locations from which the equipment can be operated.
( c ) Movement of not more than 2 inches of the actuating bar or lever resulting from the application of not more than 15 pounds of force upon contact with any portion of the equipment operator's body at any point along the length of the actuating bar or lever shall cause deenergization of the tramming motors of the self-propelled electric face equipment.
[38 FR 3406, Feb. 6, 1973; 38 FR 4394, Feb. 14, 1973]
Exhibit 32.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), R. Allan Bradley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and S. E. Parks, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR PIPELINE COMPANY   March 17, 2008 /s/R. Allan Bradley R. Allan Bradley President and Chief Executive Officer    March 17, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             323
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                       228
<INVENTORY>                                     12,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,233
<PP&E>                                          60,928
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,093
<BONDS>                                          3,124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,167
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,496
<SALES>                                         26,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,906
<CGS>                                           20,142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    496
<INCOME-TAX>                                       204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                292
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       292
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18


</TABLE>
Gormas, Michael (OSn 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Hello everyone, 

Gormas, Michael (OST) 

Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:33 AM 

Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Sharpe, Jennifer; matwood@cozen.com; 

Laurie.Gill@ci.pierre.sd.us; timjohnson@senate.gov; christopher_carlson@senate.gov; 

john_thune@senate.gov; kristi.noem@mail.house.gov; 

jessica_yearous@thune.senate.gov; peter.eckrich@mail.house.gov; 

andrew.christianson@mail.house.gov; Ronald McNeill 

Devany, Dennis (OST); Chuck Howell; dvoss@flygreatlakes.com; 

shawn@boutiqueair.com; 'mickeybowman@msn.com'; 'SBeale@flyadi.com' 

Essential Air Service at Pierre, South Dakota 

Boutque Air Pierre Bid.pdf; Great Lakes PIR Bid as of 10-14-14 Final.pdf; ADI EAS BID for 

DEN Service to PIR.pdf 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Pierre, SD as well as give you an opportunity to 

offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and 

lnternatio.nal Affairs. 

We issued Order 2014-9-10 (September 15, 2014), requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EAS. In 

response to our request, we received three proposals: Great Lakes Aviation, Boutique Air, and Aerodynamics, Inc. 

I have attached each air carrier's proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov 

sometime today. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, 

but no later than Monday, November 17, 2014. Please send your comments directly via e-mail to 

michael.gormas@dot.gov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution 

list. 

Please direct all questions regarding these proposals to Michael Gormas at michael.gormas@dot.gov. 

Best Regards, 

Michael D. Gormas 

United States Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

202.366.1853 

1
### SUBCHAPTER VII—PAYMENTS TO MISSING EMPLOYEES
### §21143. Review and report on adequacy of existing electoral fraud statutes and penalties

#### (a) Review

The Attorney General shall conduct a review of existing criminal statutes concerning election offenses to determine—

(1) whether additional statutory offenses are needed to secure the use of the Internet for election purposes; and

(2) whether existing penalties provide adequate punishment and deterrence with respect to such offenses.

#### (b) Report

The Attorney General shall submit a report to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and House of Representatives, the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, and the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives on the review conducted under subsection (a) together with such recommendations for legislative and administrative action as the Attorney General determines appropriate.

(Pub. L. 107–252, title IX, §904, Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1729.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15543 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 872.32 What are certified in lieu funds?

“Certified in lieu funds” are moneys that we distribute to you, the certified State or Indian tribe, in lieu of moneys allocated to your State or Tribal share of the Fund after October 1, 2007. Certified in lieu funds come from general funds of the United States Treasury that are otherwise unappropriated. Beginning with the 2009 Federal fiscal year which starts on October 1, 2008, we distribute certified in lieu funds to you under section 411(h)(2) of SMCRA.
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 000300tp
- 00040000
- 00050001
- 00060002
- 00070000
- 00080000
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110000
- 00120000
- 00130000
- 00140000
- 00150000
- 00160000
- 00170000
- 00180000
- 00190000
- 00200000
- 00210000
- 00220000
- 00230000
- 00240000
- 00250003
- 00260004
- 00270005
- 00280006
- 00290007
- 00300000
- 003100bi
- 003200bc
### §3807. Bounties for induction; substitutes; purchase of release

No bounty may be paid to induce any person to be inducted into an armed force. A clothing allowance authorized by law is not a bounty for the purposes of this section. No person liable for training and service under this Act may furnish a substitute for that training or service. No person may be enlisted, inducted, or appointed in an armed force as a substitute for another. No person liable for training and service under section 3803 of this title may escape that training and service or be discharged before the end of his period of training and service by paying money or any other valuable thing as consideration for his release from that training and service or liability therefor.

(June 24, 1948, ch. 625, title I, §8, 62 Stat. 614; Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §22(d), 70A Stat. 630.)

#### Termination of Induction for Training and Service

For provisions relating to termination of induction for training and service in the Armed Forces after July 1, 1973, see section 3815(c) of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 24, 1948, ch. 625, 62 Stat. 604, known as the Military Selective Service Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 3801 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 458 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section 8 of act June 24, 1948, 62 Stat. 614, cited as a credit to this section, was repealed by act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641, 678, and provisions thereof (as applicable to induction) were restated in this section by section 22(d) of act Aug. 10, 1956. Provisions of such section 8 (less applicability to induction) were restated by first section of act Aug. 10, 1956, as section 514 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

#### Amendments

1956—Act Aug. 10, 1956, struck out provisions which prohibited payment of any bounty to induce any person to enlist into Armed Forces. See section 514 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of DynCorp (the "Company") on Form
10-Q/A as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Paul V. Lombardi, as President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of my
knowledge, that:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations for
     the dates and periods covered by the Report.

     This  certificate is being made for the exclusive  purpose of compliance by
the Chief Executive  Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be disclosed,  distributed or used
by any person of for any reason other than as specifically required by law.


Date November 8, 2002                    /S/ Paul V. Lombardi
---------------------                    --------------------
                                         Paul V. Lombardi
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9


           AGREEMENT MADE AS OF AUGUST 23, 2002 BETWEEN FIRST NATIONAL
                        BANK OF GAYLORD AND JOHN R. KLUCK

         In consideration of the reliance placed by John R. Kluck as a Director
of First National Bank of Gaylord on the Board Resolution of June 18, 1990, as
incorporated in Section 2.1 of the Bank's Bylaws prior to rescission of the
Resolution and the adoption of the Restated Bylaws in June 2002, First National
Bank of Gaylord (the "Bank"), and its successors and assigns, agrees to provide,
at Bank expense, to John R. Kluck and his current spouse, if any, during their
lifetimes, the health insurance coverage that is provided from time to time to
individual employees of the Bank and their spouses (not including coverage of
any other dependents); provided, that if John R. Kluck's current spouse ceases
to be his spouse, for any reason, (other than the death of John R. Kluck), such
former spouse will not be entitled to coverage, and the coverage will not extend
to a subsequent spouse of John R. Kluck; provided, that if a surviving spouse,
who otherwise would be entitled to coverage, remarries and becomes entitled to
health care coverage as the result of the remarriage, such spouse will no longer
be entitled to coverage from the Bank. This agreement cannot be altered or
modified, in any form, without the expressed written consent of the Bank and
John R. Kluck or, if he is deceased, the express written consent of the
surviving spouse, if any, who would be entitled to coverage from the Bank.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GAYLORD

/s/ Matthew H. Nowicki                         /s/ John R. Kluck
-----------------------------------            ---------------------------------
Matthew H. Nowicki, Chairman of                John R. Kluck, Director
The Board
# C_2023272EN.01000501.xml

| 1.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11215 – PAI PARTNERS / HG / AZETS)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 272/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | PAI Partners S.à.r.l. (France), wholly-owned subsidiary of PAI Partners SAS (France), together ‘PAI Partners’, |
| --- | --- |

—

PAI Partners S.à.r.l. (France), wholly-owned subsidiary of PAI Partners SAS (France), together ‘PAI Partners’,

| — | HgCapital LLP (‘Hg’, United Kingdom), |
| --- | --- |

—

HgCapital LLP (‘Hg’, United Kingdom),

| — | Azets Topco Limited (‘Azets’, Jersey), currently controlled by Hg. |
| --- | --- |

—

Azets Topco Limited (‘Azets’, Jersey), currently controlled by Hg.

PAI Partners and Hg will acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Azets.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | PAI Partners is a private equity firm. The funds managed by PAI Partners have a policy of acquiring majority shareholdings in companies active worldwide in the business services, food & consumer, general industrials, and healthcare sectors, |
| --- | --- |

—

PAI Partners is a private equity firm. The funds managed by PAI Partners have a policy of acquiring majority shareholdings in companies active worldwide in the business services, food & consumer, general industrials, and healthcare sectors,

| — | Hg is an investor in software and services businesses with a focus on Europe and the United States, |
| --- | --- |

—

Hg is an investor in software and services businesses with a focus on Europe and the United States,

| — | Azets is a provider of accounting, tax, audit, advisory, human resources support and payroll support services mainly for SMEs and is active throughout the EEA. |
| --- | --- |

—

Azets is a provider of accounting, tax, audit, advisory, human resources support and payroll support services mainly for SMEs and is active throughout the EEA.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11215 – PAI PARTNERS / HG / AZETS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1911

LINWOOD E. MOORING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY; ROBBIE HUDSON,

official capacity; EARNIE MARSHABURN, official

capacity; JOE NORRIS, official capacity; WOODY

BOLTON, official capacity; GLORIA SCHWARTZ,

official capacity; PAULA HUTCHINSON, official

capacity; ROGER NOBLES, official capacity;

ARTHUR G. HOWELL, JR., official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-02-62-4-H(3))

Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linwood E. Mooring, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oregon Lawton, III,

Associate Attorney General, Celia Grasty Lata, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Linwood E. Mooring appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985,

1986, 1988 (2000), his criminal conspiracy claims under 18 U.S.C.

§§ 241, 242 (2000), and his Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt

Organizations Act (RICO) claims under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1962

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Mooring v. East Carolina Univ., No. CA-02-62-4H(3) (E.D.N.C. Aug.

6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 12-38
 THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Nine Months Ended
    
    
    Twelve Months Ended December 31(Millions of Dollars)
    
    September 30, 2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Earnings:Pretax earnings
    
    $
    562
    
    
    $
    604
    
    
    $
    517
    
    
    $
    466
    
    
    $
    482
    
    
    $
    426Fixed charges
    
    
    257
    
    
    
    348
    
    
    
    324
    
    
    
    319
    
    
    
    299
    
    
    
    280Net earnings
    
    $
    819
    
    
    $
    952
    
    
    $
    841
    
    
    $
    785
    
    
    $
    781
    
    
    $
    706Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    241
    
    
    $
    325
    
    
    $
    293
    
    
    $
    294
    
    
    $
    278
    
    
    $
    267Adjustments
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    23
    
    
    
    31
    
    
    
    25
    
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    13Fixed charges
    
    $
    257
    
    
    $
    348
    
    
    $
    324
    
    
    $
    319
    
    
    $
    299
    
    
    $
    280Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges
    
    
    3.19
    
    
    
    2.74
    
    
    
    2.60
    
    
    
    2.46
    
    
    
    2.61
    
    
    
    2.52
### §3031. Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center

#### (a) Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center

The Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center appointed under section 902 of the Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of 2002 (50 U.S.C. 3382) is a component of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

#### (b) Duties

The Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center shall perform the duties provided in the Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of 2002 and such other duties as may be prescribed by the Director of National Intelligence or specified by law.

(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title I, §103F, as added Pub. L. 108–458, title I, §1011(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3660; amended Pub. L. 115–31, div. N, title IV, §401(e)(1), May 5, 2017, 131 Stat. 819.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of 2002, referred to in subsec. (b), is title IX of Pub. L. 107–306, Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 2432. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 403–3f of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

Pub. L. 115–31, §401(e)(1)(A), substituted "Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center" for "National Counterintelligence Executive" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–31, §401(e)(1)(B), substituted "Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center" for "National Counterintelligence Executive" in heading and "Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center appointed under section 902 of the Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of 2002 (50 U.S.C. 3382)" for "National Counterintelligence Executive under section 902 of the Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of 2002" in text.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–31, §401(e)(1)(C), substituted "Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center" for "National Counterintelligence Executive".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For Determination by President that section take effect on Apr. 21, 2005, see Memorandum of President of the United States, Apr. 21, 2005, 70 F.R. 23925, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.

Section effective not later than six months after Dec. 17, 2004, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 1097(a) of Pub. L. 108–458, set out in an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment; Transition Provisions note under section 3001 of this title.