alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 810.2 Objective. The objective of this subchapter is to ensure that coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations are conducted in manners which are compatible with the environmental, social, and esthetic needs of the Nation. Accordingly, the performance standards and design requirements in this subchapter will provide for— ( a ) Protection of the health, safety, and general welfare of mine workers and the public;
( b ) Maximum use and conservation of the solid fuel resource being recovered so that reaffecting the land through future surface coal mining operations can be minimized;
( c ) Prompt reclamation of all affected areas to conditions that are capable of supporting the premining land uses or higher or better land uses;
( d ) Reclamation of land affected by surface coal mining operations as contemporaneously as practicable with mining operations;
( e ) Minimizing, to the extent possible using the best technology currently available, disturbances and adverse impacts on fish, wildlife, and other related environmental values, and enhancement of such resources where practicable;
( f ) Revegetation which achieves a prompt vegetative cover and recovery of productivity levels compatible with approved land uses;
( g ) Minimum disturbance to the prevailing hydrologic balance at the mine-site and in associated off-site areas, and to the quality and quantity of water in surface and ground water systems;
( h ) Protection of fragile and historic lands where surface coal mining operations could result in significant damage to important historic, cultural, scientific, or esthetic values and natural systems;
( i ) Confinement of surface coal mining and reclamation operations including, but not limited to, the location of spoil disposal areas to lands within the permit area; and
( j ) Striking a balance between protection of the environment and agricultural productivity and the Nation's need for coal as an essential source of energy.
( k ) Protection of endangered and threatened species and their critical habitats as determined by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 *et seq.*).
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 10, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-14510 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 Agency No. A088-187-001

NOHA IBRAHIM MABROUK RAMADAN, 

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

________________________

 Petition for Review of a Decision of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

 ________________________

(June 10, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Noha Ramadan, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions this Court for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the
immigration judge’s denial of her application for withholding of removal.

Ramadan alleged that she suffered past persecution and had a well-founded fear of

future persecution on account of a statutorily protected ground, namely her

particular social group of being a female in the Middle East. The BIA denied

Ramadan’s withholding claim in part because this purported social group was “too

broad to be legally cognizable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act

(“INA”). 

We express no view on that finding by the BIA because Ramadan fails to

challenge it in her brief to this Court, and she has therefore abandoned any such

argument. See Sepulveda v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 401 F.3d 1226, 1228 n.2 (11th Cir.

2005). As a result, Ramadan cannot show that any past persecution she suffered 1

or well-founded fear of persecution she may have was on account of a statutorily

protected ground, as required to obtain withholding of removal. See Delgado v.

U.S. Att’y Gen., 487 F.3d 855, 860–61 (11th Cir. 2007); INA § 241(b)(3), 8

U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3). Accordingly, we deny her petition.

PETITION DENIED. 

 Ramadan has also abandoned on appeal any claim of asylum or relief under the 1

Convention Against Torture. 

2
#### § 912.780 Surface mining permit applications—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan.

Part 780 of this chapter, *Surface Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

MICHAEL DURHAM, 

 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Appellee.

§ 

§ No. 283, 2022 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below–Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 0208019524A (K) 

§ 

 Submitted: August 29, 2022 

 Decided: September 8, 2022 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

ORDER 

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the parties’ responses, it 

appears to the Court that: 

(1) On August 10, 2022, the appellant, Michael Durham, filed a notice of 

appeal from the Superior Court’s July 6, 2022 order denying his third motion for 

postconviction relief. A timely notice of appeal was due on or before August 5, 

2022.1 The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Durham to show cause why 

this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed under Supreme Court Rule 6. 

1 See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(iv) (providing that a notice of appeal must be filed “[w]ithin 30 after 

entry upon the docket of a judgment or order in any proceeding for postconviction relief”). 
2 

(2) In his response to the notice to show cause, Durham claims that the 

Superior Court initially mailed the July 6, 2022 order to a post office box in Las 

Vegas, Nevada—not to the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (JTVCC) in 

Smyrna, Delaware, where Durham is incarcerated. Durham further alleges that he 

did not receive a copy of the order until July 20, 2022. To support his claims, 

Durham (i) attaches a copy of an envelope from the Superior Court Judges’ 

Chambers, postmarked July 8, 2022, and addressed to Durham in “Las Vegas, NV 

89119,” and (ii) refers the Court to the exhibit attached to his notice of appeal—a 

copy of an envelope from the Superior Court Judges’ Chambers, addressed to 

Durham at JTVCC, postmarked July 15, 2022, and marked “received” by the JTVCC 

mailroom on July 20, 2022. 

(3) At the request of the Court, the State also filed a response to the notice 

to show cause. The State concedes that (i) the envelopes submitted by Durham 

support a finding that the Superior Court’s order was initially mailed to Nevada and 

Durham did not receive a copy of the order until July 20, 2022 and (ii) the mailing 

delay appears to be attributable to court-related personnel. The State therefore does 

not object to remanding this matter to the Superior Court with instructions to re-issue 

the July 6, 2022 order to allow Durham to file a timely notice of appeal. 

(4) We conclude that Durham’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal is 

at least partially attributable to court personnel and that the proper course of action 
3 

is to remand this matter to the Superior Court. Upon remand, the Superior Court 

shall re-issue its July 6, 2022 order. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is 

REMANDED to the Superior Court for further action in accordance with this Order. 

Jurisdiction is not retained. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.

               DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

                            Financial Data Schedule
                     (In thousands, except per share data)

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            827,502
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,169,218
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            20,845,439
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          22,221,780
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            17,210,905
<PP&E>                                            440,835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 75,292,849
<SHORT-TERM>                                    1,100,360
<PAYABLES>                                     10,258,228
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   35,693,542
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                             7,641,307
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             11,343,860
<LONG-TERM>                                     3,137,104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             200,000
<PREFERRED>                                       375,000
<COMMON>                                           12,272
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,474,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   75,292,849
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                 (99,700)
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            1,754,975
<COMMISSIONS>                                     624,900
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   1,096,655
<FEE-REVENUE>                                      74,949
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,126,793
<COMPENSATION>                                  1,704,218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   489,350
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        489,350
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      302,150
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        2.42<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        2.18<F1>
<FN>                                           
<F1> Basic and diluted earnings per share amounts have been restated for the
     implementation of SFAS No. 128 "Earnings Per Share" and for the effect of
     the stock split. The restated basic and diluted earnings per share amounts
     at September 30, 1997 totaled $2.71 and $2.40, respectively.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# #

##

#

#

## #

#

# #

#

#

# # #

###

###

#

## # #

#

## ##

#

##

# #

#### #### # #

# #

# #

### ##

##

#

# #

# #

### ##

#

##

####

#

# # ##

##

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

# ##

#

##

#

#

##

#

#

#

##

#

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

# # # ##

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

###

#

###

#

#

##

######

#

###

#

##

#

#

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

##

#

#

#

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

# #

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

##

# #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

# #

#

# #

#

# ###

#

#

##

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

##

# #

#

#

##

#

### #

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

# #

# #

#

#

#

# #

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

# #

##

##

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

Map 3-14: Developed Recreation

Sites and Management Areas

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundaries

# Developed Recreation Sites

BLM Special Recreation Management Areas

USFS Recreation Management Areas

Other BLM/USFS Recreation Areas

BLM & USFS Surface Management

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
Cessna Aircraft Company One Cessna Boulevard, P.O. Box 7704, Wichita, Kansas 67277-7704, 316/517-6000

Cessna Aircraft Company is a subsidiary of Textron Inc. A Textron Company 

## C

essna 15 February 2011

IN REPLY, REFER TO:

L390-11-0394

Don Stimson, FAA - Airplane & Flight Crew Interface Branch ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate

Aircraft Certification Service 1601 Lind Avenue, SW. Renton, WA 98057-3356

SUBJECT: Cessna comments on Docket N o. FAA-2010-0310; Notice No. 10-17 -

Harmonization of Various Airworthin ess Standards for Transport Category Airplanes--Flight Rules

Dear Stimson,

This letter is being transmitted electronically; the original will be maintained in the

Cessna Airworthiness files.

Cessna Aircraft Company requests that the F AA take this opportunity to correct an existing typographical error in 25.253(b). In the list of regula tions that must be met at Vfc/Mfc, 25.147(e) should be 25.147(f).

Cessna Aircraft Company appreciates the FAA’ s consideration of our comments. If you require additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Neale Eyler at telephone number 316- 517-7488, facsimile number 316-206-7258, or email neyler@cessna.textron.com.

Sincerely,

for Carlos Ayala Manager of Airworthiness

CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40458

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE HERNANDEZ-GOMEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:07-CR-661-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Hernandez-Gomez has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez-Gomez has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 30, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
# C_2023245EN.01000101.xml

| 12.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11136 – PETRONAS / NPI / CANWIND and NORTHWIND (JVs))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 245/01)

On 27 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11136. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11136. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
§ 902.20 Approval of Alaska abandoned mine land reclamation plan. The Alaska Reclamation Plan, as submitted on August 17, 1983, is approved effective December 23, 1983. Copies of the approved plan are available at: ( a ) Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining and Water Management, 3601 C Street, Suite 800, Anchorage, AK 99503-5925, Telephone: (907)762-2149.
( b ) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Western Regional Coordinating Center, Technical Library, 1999 Broadway, Suite 3320, Denver, Colorado 80202-5733.
[60 FR 33724, June 29, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 54593, Oct. 25, 1995]
### §60125. Agency activities

(a) License Application and Issuance.—A private sector party may apply for a license to operate a private remote sensing space system which utilizes, on a space-available basis, a civilian United States Government satellite or vehicle as a platform for such system. The Secretary, pursuant to this subchapter, may license such system if it meets all conditions of this subchapter and—

(1) the system operator agrees to reimburse the Government in a timely manner for all related costs incurred with respect to such utilization, including a reasonable and proportionate share of fixed, platform, data transmission, and launch costs; and

(2) such utilization would not interfere with or otherwise compromise intended civilian Government missions, as determined by the agency responsible for such civilian platform.

(b) Assistance.—The Secretary may offer assistance to private sector parties in finding appropriate opportunities for such utilization.

(c) Agreements.—To the extent provided in advance by appropriation Acts, any United States Government agency may enter into agreements for such utilization if such agreements are consistent with such agency's mission and statutory authority, and if such remote sensing space system is licensed by the Secretary before commencing operation.

(d) Applicability.—This section does not apply to activities carried out under subchapter IV.

(e) Effect on FCC Authority.—Nothing in this subchapter shall affect the authority of the Federal Communications Commission pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3416.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60125 | 15 U.S.C. 5625. | Pub. L. 102–555, title II, §205, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4173. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Communications Act of 1934, referred to in subsec. (e), is act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, which is classified principally to chapter 5 (§ 151 et seq.) of Title 47, Telecommunications. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of Title 47 and Tables.
#### § 1602.4 Area office.

The Selective Service Office which is responsible for all administrative and operational support for the one or more local boards within its jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Clean Systems Technology
Group, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Jacob Lustgarten, the Chief
Executive
 Officer of the Company, hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods represented in the Report.

Dated: June 7, 2004


/S/ JACOB LUSTGARTEN
--------------------
Jacob Lustgarten
Chief Executive Officer
§ 877.13 Entry and consent to reclaim. ( a ) OSM, the State, or Indian tribe or its agents, employees, or contractors may enter upon land to perform reclamation activities or conduct studies or exploratory work to determine the existence of the adverse effects of past coal mining if consent from the owner is obtained.
( b ) If consent is not obtained, then, prior to entry under this section, the OSM, State, or Indian tribe shall find in writing, with supporting reasons that— ( 1 ) Land or water resources have been or may be adversely affected by past coal mining practices;
( 2 ) The adverse effects are at a state where, in the interest of the public health, safety, or the general welfare, action to restore, reclaim, abate, control, or prevent should be taken; and
( 3 ) The owner of the land or water resources where entry must be made to restore, reclaim, abate, control, or prevent the adverse effects of past coal mining practices is not known or readily available, or the owner will not give permission for OSM, State, or Indian tribe or its agents, employees, or contractors to enter upon such property to restore, reclaim, abate, control, or prevent the effects of past coal mining practices.
( c ) If consent is not obtained, OSM, State, or Indian tribe shall give notice of its intent to enter for purposes of conducting reclamation at least 30 days before entry upon the property. The notice shall be in writing and shall be mailed, return receipt requested, to the owner, if known, with a copy of the findings required by this section. If the owner is not known, or if the current mailing address of the owner is not known, notice shall be posted in one or more places on the property to be entered where it is readily visible to the public and advertised once in a newspaper of general circulation in the locality in which the land is located. The notice posted on the property and advertised in the newspaper shall include a statement of where the findings required by this section may be inspected or obtained.