alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
M. P. No. 77-1.

#### Vision Cable Company of Rhode Island, Inc. *v.*Archie Smith, *Administrator.*

*Philip R. De Sano,*Corn-Cable, Inc., for petitioner.

*J. Frederick Murphy, David B. Loveli, Paul E. Burke, Geo. C. Berk, Louis Jackvony, William Harsch, Chas. J. McGovern, Dennis Roberts II, Daniel Murray, Wm. McGair, Harold W. Demopulos, Max Wistow, Julius Michaelson,*for defendant.

The motion of Vision Cable Company of Rhode Island, Inc. that the time for filing its brief be stayed until the time when the briefs are filed by all other parties is granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED  PARTNERSHIP IV FOR
TWELVE  MONTHS  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1996,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  591,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,000,562
<PP&E>                                      32,383,773
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,753,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,488,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,737,790
<BONDS>                                     18,939,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,488,126
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,536,412
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,723,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,869,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,186,716)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,501,158
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   314,442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
#### Gertrude Gottlieb, Appellant, v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Motion by the American Mutual Insurance Alliance for permission to join in the brief as *amicus curice*of the Association of Casualty and Surety Companies, granted. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### **CHAPTER 10—HELIUM GAS**

Sec.
161 to 166. Omitted or Repealed.
167.
Definitions.
167a.
Authority of Secretary.
167b.
Storage, transportation, and withdrawal of crude helium.
167c.
Storage, withdrawal and transportation.
167d.
Sale of crude helium.
167e.
Intragovernmental cooperation.
167f.
Repealed.
167g.
Promulgation of rules and regulations.
167h.
Administrative procedure.
167i.
Exclusion from Natural Gas Act provisions.
167j.
Land conveyance in Potter County, Texas.
167k.
Violations; penalties.
167 l.
Injunctions.
167m.
Information.
167n.
Helium gas resource assessment.
167 o.
Low-Btu gas separation and helium conservation.
167p.
Helium-3 separation.
167q.
Federal agency helium acquisition strategy.
#### § 912.784 Underground mining permit applications—minimum requirements for reclamation and operation plan.

Part 784 of this chapter, *Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan,* shall apply to any person who makes application to conduct underground coal mining.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30718

Summary Calendar

 

JUDE TROSCLAIR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHELL OIL COMPANY, ET AL

Defendants

KERR-MCGEE CORPORATION;

SHELL OFFSHORE, INC.

Defendants- Appellees

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-3799-D)

 

February 19, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of KerrMcGee Corporation and Shell Offshore, Inc. Trosclair has failed to

present evidence demonstrating a genuine issue of material fact as

to whether defendants retained operational control over Dolphin’s

clean-up efforts or expressly or impliedly authorized those acts.

See Coutler v. Texaco, Inc., 117 F.3d 909, 912 (5th Cir. 1997).
2

Trosclair’s argument that defendants owed him a duty to ensure that

the clean-up activities were safely conducted is without merit.

Dupre v. Chevron, Inc., 109 F.3d 230, 231 (5th Cir. 1997) (per

curiam); Graham v. Amoco Oil, Inc., 21 F.3d 643, 647 (5th Cir.

1994). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors of
Glamis Gold Ltd.

We consent to the inclusion in the Registration Statement on Form F-10/A of
Glamis Gold Ltd. filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
of our report dated April 16, 2002 relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Francisco Gold Corp. as at December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related
consolidated statements of income, retained earnings (deficit) and cash flows
for each of the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, and to the
reference to our firm as experts in auditing and accounting under the heading
"Experts" in the prospectus included in the Registration Statement.

/s/ Moen and Company
Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada
November 20, 2002
§ 875.12 Eligible lands and water prior to certification. Noncoal lands and water are eligible for reclamation if: ( a ) They were mined or affected by mining processes;
( b ) They were mined and left or abandoned in either an unreclaimed or inadequately reclaimed condition prior to August 3, 1977;
( c ) There is no continuing responsibility for reclamation by the operator, permittee, or agent of the permittee under statutes of the State or Federal Government or by the State as a result of bond forfeiture. Bond forfeiture will render lands or water ineligible only if the amount forfeited is sufficient to pay the total cost of the necessary reclamation. In cases where the forfeited bond is insufficient to pay the total cost of reclamation, moneys sufficient to complete the reclamation may be sought under part 886 of this chapter;
( d ) The reclamation has been requested by the Governor of the State or equivalent head of the Indian tribe; and
( e ) The reclamation is necessary to protect the public health, safety, general welfare, and property from extreme danger of adverse effects of noncoal mining practices.
[59 FR 28172, May 31, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 67640, Nov. 14, 2008]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MICHAEL DURHAM, Defendant Below, Appellant,

v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Appellee. §

§ No. 283, 2022 § § § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § § Cr. ID No. 0208019524A (K) § Submitted: August 29, 2022 Decided: September 8, 2022

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR , Justices.

ORDER After consideration of the notice to show cause and the parties’ responses, it appears to the Court that: (1) On August 10, 2022, the appellant, Michael Durham, filed a notice of appeal from the Superior Court’s July 6, 2022 order denying his third motion for postconviction relief. A timely notice of appeal was due on or before August 5,

2022. 1 The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Durham to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed under Supreme Court Rule 6.

1 See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(iv) (providing that a notice of appeal must be filed “[w]ithin 30 after entry upon the docket of a judgment or order in any proceeding for postconviction relief”).2

(2) In his response to the notice to show cause, Durham claims that the Superior Court initially mailed the July 6, 2022 order to a post office box in Las Vegas, Nevada—not to the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (JTVCC) in Smyrna, Delaware, where Durham is incarcerated. Durham further alleges that he did not receive a copy of the order until July 20, 2022. To support his claims, Durham (i) attaches a copy of an envelope from the Superior Court Judges’ Chambers, postmarked July 8, 2022, and addressed to Durham in “Las Vegas, NV 89119,” and (ii) refers the Court to the exhibit attached to his notice of appeal—a copy of an envelope from the Superior Court Judges’ Chambers, addressed to Durham at JTVCC, postmarked July 15, 2022, and marked “received” by the JTVCC mailroom on July 20, 2022. (3) At the request of the Court, the State also filed a response to the notice to show cause. The State concedes that (i) the envelopes submitted by Durham support a finding that the Superior Court’s order was initially mailed to Nevada and Durham did not receive a copy of the order until July 20, 2022 and (ii) the mailing delay appears to be attributable to court-related personnel. The State therefore does not object to remanding this matter to the Superior Court with instructions to re-issue the July 6, 2022 order to allow Durham to file a timely notice of appeal. (4) We conclude that Durham’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal is at least partially attributable to court personnel and that the proper course of action3 is to remand this matter to the Superior Court. Upon remand, the Superior Court shall re-issue its July 6, 2022 order. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for further action in accordance with this Order.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Devcon International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald L. Smith, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    DONALD L. SMITH,
JR.
|                     |  |  |  | Donald L. Smith, Jr.       
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer    



Note: This certification is being
furnished, not filed, as exhibit 32.1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAutomated Boundary Conditions for Wind Tunnel SimulationsComputational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations of models tested in wind tunnels require a high level of fidelity and accuracy particularly for the purposes of CFD validation efforts. Considerable effort is required to ensure the proper characterization of both the physical geometry of the wind tunnel and recreating the correct flow conditions inside the wind tunnel. The typical trial-and-error effort used for determining the boundary condition values for a particular tunnel configuration are time and computer resource intensive. This paper describes a method for calculating and updating the back pressure boundary condition in wind tunnel simulations by using a proportional-integral-derivative controller. The controller methodology and equations are discussed, and simulations using the controller to set a tunnel Mach number in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel are demonstrated.Document ID20180002095Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCarlson, Jan-Renee*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 23, 2018Publication DateMarch 1, 2018Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberL-20913NASA/TM-2018-219812NF1676L-29535Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.07.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180002095.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2023089EN.01000801.xml

| 10.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/8

---

Notice for the attention of one entity subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses

(2023/C 89/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the Wagner Group, entity subject to restrictive measures in the Annex to Council Decision 2020/1999/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 2020/1998 (2) concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses.

The Council intends to include the abovementioned entity in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (3) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The entity concerned is hereby informed that it may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statement of reasons for its designation, by 17 March 2023, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 410 I, 7.12.2020, p. 13.

(2)  OJ L 410 I, 7.12.2020, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(4)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

---
#### PEOPLE ex rel. DILLON v. McADOO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 24, 1905.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of James Dillon, against William McAdoo. L. E. Warren, for relator. T. Connoly, for respondent. No opinion. Writ dismissed, and proceedings affirmed, with costs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATIONS

                    I, Jesse Ross, certify that:



         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Diapulse
Corporation of America, Inc.;


         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report; and


         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report

         4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have

          a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
               material information relating to the registrant, including its
               consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
               those entities, particularly during the period in which this
               annual report is being prepared;

          b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
               controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
               filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

          a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
               internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
               ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
               and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
               weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
               other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
               internal controls; and

         6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



                       Date:  April 29, 2003
                         By:  /s/ Jesse Ross
                              Jesse Ross
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                Principal Financial Officer
# C_2023298EN.01000501.xml

| 23.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/5

---

Update of the list of national services responsible for border control as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (1)

(2023/C 298/05)

The publication of the list of national services responsible for border control as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (2) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in conformity with Article 39 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a regular update is available on the website of the Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs.

LIST OF NATIONAL SERVICES RESPONSIBLE FOR BORDER CONTROL

ROMANIA

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 375, 17.10.2018, p. 5
  .

| — | for Romania: Poliţia de Frontieră Română (Romanian Border Police); |
| --- | --- |

—

for Romania: Poliţia de Frontieră Română (Romanian Border Police);

List of previous publications

OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 17.

OJ C 77, 5.4.2007, p. 11.

OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 1.

OJ C 164, 18.7.2007, p. 45.

OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 21.

OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 15.

OJ C 87, 1.4.2010, p. 15.

OJ C 180, 21.6.2012, p. 2.

OJ C 98, 5.4.2013, p. 2.

OJ C 256, 5.9.2013, p. 14.

OJ C 360, 10.12.2013, p. 17.

OJ C 218, 7.7.2017, p. 19.

OJ C 431, 15.12.2017, p. 8.

OJ C 345, 27.9.2018, p. 4.

OJ C 375, 17.10.2018, p. 5.

OJ C 74, 3.3.2021, p. 5.

OJ C 141, 22.4.2021, p. 2.

---

(1)  See the list of previous publications at the end of this update.

(2)  OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p. 1.

---
PUBLIC LAW 115–133—MAR. 16, 2018 132 STAT. 339 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 294: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Oct. 10, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Mar. 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–133 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2700 Cullen 

Boulevard in Pearland, Texas, as the ‘‘Endy Nddiobong Ekpanya Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ENDY NDDIOBONG EKPANYA POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2700 Cullen Boulevard in Pearland, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Endy Nddiobong Ekpanya Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Endy Nddiobong Ekpanya Post Office Building’’. 

Approved March 16, 2018. 

Mar. 16, 2018 

[H.R. 294]
Editorial Note on Part 75
Editorial Note: The provisions of this part marked [Statutory Provision] appear in Title III of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.

§ 75.703-2 Approved grounding mediums. For purposes of grounding offtrack direct-current machines, the following grounding mediums are approved: ( a ) The grounded polarity of the direct-current power system feeding such machines; or,
( b ) The alternating current grounding medium where such machines are fed by an ungrounded direct-current power system originating in a portable rectifier receiving its power from a section power center. However, when such a medium is used, a separate grounding conductor must be employed.
#### § 912.817 Performance standards—underground mining activities.

Part 817 of this chapter, *Permanent Program Performance Standards—Underground Mining Activities,* shall apply to any person who conducts underground coal mining operations.