alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 817
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 817 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 817.61 Use of explosives: General requirements. ( a ) Sections 817.61-817.68 apply to surface blasting activities incident to underground coal mining, including, but not limited to, initial rounds of slopes and shafts.
( b ) Each operator shall comply with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations in the use of explosives.
( c ) *Blasters.* ( 1 ) No later than 12 months after the blaster certification program for a State required by part 850 of this chapter has been approved under the procedures of subchapter C of this chapter, all surface blasting operations incident to underground mining in that State shall be conducted under the direction of a certified blaster. Before that time, all such blasting operations in that State shall be conducted by competent, experienced persons who understand the hazards involved.
( 2 ) Certificates of blaster certification shall be carried by blasters or shall be on file at the permit area during blasting operations.
( 3 ) A blaster and at least one other person shall be present at the firing of a blast.
( 4 ) Any blaster who is responsible for conducting blasting operations at a blasting site shall: ( i ) Be familiar with the site-specific performance standards; and
( ii ) Give direction and on-the-job training to persons who are not certified and who are assigned to the blasting crew or assist in the use of explosives.
( d ) *Blast design.* ( 1 ) An anticipated blast design shall be submitted if blasting operations will be conducted within— ( i ) 1,000 feet of any building used as a dwelling, public building, school, church or community or institutional building; or
( ii ) 500 feet of active or abandoned underground mines.
( 2 ) The blast design may be presented as part of a permit application or at a time, before the blast, approved by the regulatory authority.
( 3 ) The blast design shall contain sketches of the drill patterns, delay periods, and decking and shall indicate the type and amount of explosives to be used, critical dimensions, and the location and general description of structures to be protected, as well as a discussion of design factors to be used, which protect the public and meet the applicable airblast, flyrock, and ground-vibration standards in § 817.67.
( 4 ) The blast design shall be prepared and signed by a certified blaster.
( 5 ) The regulatory authority may require changes to the design submitted.
[48 FR 9492, Mar. 4, 1983, and 48 FR 9809, Mar. 8, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 19461, May 29, 1986; 81 FR 93418, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54999, Nov. 17, 2017]
§ 1630.45 Class 4-G: Registrant exempted from service because of the death of his parent or sibling while serving in the Armed Forces or whose parent or sibling is in a captured or missing in action status. In Class 4-G shall be placed any registrant who, except during a period of war or national emergency declared by Congress, is: ( a ) A surviving son or brother: ( 1 ) Whose parent or sibling of the whole blood was killed in action or died in the line of duty while serving in the Armed Forces of the United States after December 31, 1959, or died subsequent to such date as a result of injuries received or disease incurred in the line of duty during such service; or
( 2 ) Whose parent or sibling of the whole blood is in a captured or missing status as a result of such service in the Armed Forces during any period of time; or
( b ) The sole surviving son of a family in which the father or one or more siblings were killed in action before January 1, 1960 while serving in the Armed Forces of the United States, or died after that date due to injuries received or disease incurred in the line of duty during such service before Janaury 1, 1960.
[47 FR 4651, Feb. 1, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 24456, July 1, 1987]
### §200509. Recordkeeping

(a) In General.—A recipient of assistance under this chapter shall keep such records as the Secretary shall prescribe, including—

(1) records that disclose—

(A) the amount and disposition of project undertakings in connection with which assistance under this chapter is given or used; and

(B) the amount and nature of the portion of the cost of the project or undertaking that is supplied by other sources; and

(2) such other records as will facilitate an effective audit.

(b) Access.—The Secretary and the Comptroller General shall have access for the purpose of audit and examination to any records of the recipient that are pertinent to assistance received under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3186.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 200509 | 16 U.S.C. 2511. | Pub. L. 95–625, title X, §1012, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3543. |

Section

In subsection (a)(1), the word "fully" is omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), the words "or their duly authorized representatives" are omitted as unnecessary. See section 2 of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1950 (5 U.S.C. App., 43 U.S.C. 1451 note) for the Secretary and 31 U.S.C. 711(2) for the Comptroller General.
#### Anna L. R. Kruze, Appellant, v. Isabel M. Keleher, as Secretary of the City of New York Board of Estimate, New York City Employees’ Retirement System, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of the Estate of Frank J. Kruze, Deceased. Anna L. R. Kruze, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frank J. Kruze, Deceased, Appellant; Isabel M. Keleher, as Secretary of City of New York Board of Estimate, New York City Employees’ Retirement System, et al., Respondents.

Consolidated appeals: (1) In an action by plaintiff, Anna Luisa Ramirez Kruze, to recover the amount of the accumulated contributions of her husband, now deceased, to the New York City Employees’ Retirement System and a cash death benefit, and for other relief, she appeals, as limited by her brief: (a) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 9, 1961, as granted the cross motion of defendant Martinez, in which the defendant New York City Employees’ Retirement System joined, to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action; and (b) from the judgment entered thereon November 30, 1961, dismissing the complaint. Order, insofar as appealed from, and judgment, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. *688(2) In a purported “ proceeding ” by petitioner, Anna Luisa Ramirez Kruze, as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Prank Joseph Kruze, to compel the respondent, New York City Employees’ Retirement System, to pay over to her the amount of the deceased’s accumulated contributions to the Retirement System, and a cash death benefit, and to compel the striking out of the name of respondent, Marie Dominguez Kruze (now Marie Dominguez Martinez), as deceased’s designated beneficiary of such contributions and death benefit, -the petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief: (a) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 22, 1961, as granted respondents’ cross motions, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the petition on the ground that it fails to set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and (b) from the judgment entered thereon in the County of Queens on December 6, 1961. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appeal from judgment dismissed; no such judgment is contained in the record. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [31 Misc 2d 756.]
### **CHAPTER 13—SPECIAL AUTHORITY**

Sec.
1301.
Rules.
1302.
Regulations.
1303.
Investigations; reports.
1304.
Loyalty investigations; reports; revolving fund.
1305.
Administrative law judges.
1306.
Oaths to witnesses.
1307.
Minutes.
[1308.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–362, title XIII, §1302(b)(2)(A), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3293, struck out item 1308 "Annual reports".

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–251, §2(c)(1), Mar. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 183, substituted "Administrative law judges" for "Hearing examiners" in item 1305.
###### Editorial Note on Part 816

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-5, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement removed all amendments to part 816 made effective on Jan. 19, 2017, at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 816.56 Postmining rehabilitation of sedimentation ponds, diversions, impoundments, and treatment facilities.

Before abandoning a permit area or seeking bond release, the operator shall ensure that all temporary structures are removed and reclaimed, and that all permanent sedimentation ponds, diversions, impoundments, and treatment facilities meet the requirements of this chapter for permanent structures, have been maintained properly, and meet the requirements of the approved reclamation plan for permanent structures and impoundments. The operator shall renovate such structures if necessary to meet the requirements of this chapter and to conform to the approved reclamation plan.

[48 FR 44005, Sept. 26, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 93392, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 54979, Nov. 17, 2017]
### Storm and flood of July 31-August 1, 1976, in the Big Thompson River and Cache la Poudre River basins, Larimer and Weld Counties, Colorado

By: Jerald F. McCainR. R. Shroba

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1115AB

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2-1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2-2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §40. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title XIII, §1, 40 Stat. 231, defined "United States" as used in act June 15, 1917, and was transferred to section 195 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1293

VERNON AVERY YATES,

Petitioner,

versus

LITTLE SIX CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(94-2343-BLA)

Submitted: June 30, 1997 Decided: November 4, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernon Avery Yates, Petitioner Pro Se. Ramesh Murthy, PENN, STUART

& ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia; Christian P. Barber, Helen Hart

Cox, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1997). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Yates v.

Little Six Corp., No. 94-2343-BLA (Jan. 26, 1995). We deny the employer's motion to strike the Director's brief, but nonetheless decline to consider issues not raised before the Board. See Big Horn

Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs,

Dep't of Labor, 897 F.2d 1052, 1054 (10th Cir. 1990); see also

Pleasant Valley Hosp., Inc. v. Shalala, 32 F.3d 67, 70 (4th Cir.

1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 4.17

                                AMENDMENT NO. 4
                                       TO
                                    DEBENTURE

ISSUANCE DATE                          June 20,2003
CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE DUE              June 30,2005 (as amended)
AMOUNT                                 Up to $ 1,250,000.00 (as amended)

        This Amendment No. 4 to Debenture, dated March 2, 2005, is made by and
between AccuPoll Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation ("AHI"), Dennis Vadura
("Vadura"), AccuPoll, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("API," and, together with
Vadura and AHI, the "Company"), and Palisades Capital, LLC. (the "Holder").

Extension of Maturity Date:

The Maturity Date of the Debenture is hereby extended to June 30, 2005

Extension Fee:

The Company hereby acknowledges and agrees that the current principal and
interest balance of the note, as of March 1,2005, is $956,046.20. The Company
hereby agrees to pay the sum of $95,604 in consideration of the extension set
forth above. Such amount will be added to the balance of the Debenture as of the
date hereof.

Consent and Acknowledgement:

The Company, and each of them, hereby consent to, and acknowledge full force and
effectiveness of this Amendment No. 4 to the Debenture. The Parties
acknowledge that the holder hereof verbally agreed to waive any default as a
result of the lapse of the maturity date hereof on December 31, 2004, and to
negotiate an appropriate extension.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has duly executed this Amendment No. 3
to Debenture as of March 1, 2005.

ACCUPOLL HOLDING CORP.                 Palisades Capital, LLC
ACCUPOLL, INC.


By   /s/ Dennis Vadura                 By:
   ------------------------------         ------------------------------------
Dennis Vadura                          Name:
Chairman and CEO                            Title:


Acknowledgement and Consent:
DENNIS VADURA

/s/ DENNIS VADURA
---------------------------------
Dennis Vadura, an individual


                                       1
#### THOMPSON, Appellant, v. ROWE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 21, 1905.)

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Myrtle M. Thompson against Basil W. Rowe, as treasurer of Adams Express Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Paul N. Turner, for appellant. Guthrie, Cravath & Henderson (Joseph Diehl Fackenthal, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In our opinion the assignment sought to be enforced in this action was within the intention of the statute (chapter 77, p. 156, Laws 1904), and therefore subject to its provisions. People ex rel. Wood v. Lacombe, 99 N. Y. 43, 1 N. E. 599; Spencer v. Myers, 150 N. Y. 269, 44 N. E. 942, 34 L. R. A. 175. 55 Am. St. Rep. 675. The complicated transaction resorted to was evidently a mere subterfuge to escape the statute. To permit it to succeed would defeat the obvious purpose of the Legislature in enacting the statute in question. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Summary
of Financial Position at June  30, 2000 (unaudited) and the Statement of
Operations for the year  ended  June 30, 2000 (unaudited)  for  Discovery Oil,
Ltd. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      438,863
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    93,134
<OTHER-SE>                                (531,996)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,136
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,149)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,149)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,149)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.00)





</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 939 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H.R. 939

  To modify the restriction in section 3326 of title 5, United States 
   Code, relating to the appointment of retired members of the Armed 
Forces to positions in the Department of Defense to apply to positions 
                      at or above the GS-14 level.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

Mr. Moore of Utah (for himself and Mr. Kilmer) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the restriction in section 3326 of title 5, United States 
   Code, relating to the appointment of retired members of the Armed 
Forces to positions in the Department of Defense to apply to positions 
                      at or above the GS-14 level.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Retain Skilled Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON APPOINTMENT OF RETIRED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES TO CERTAIN POSITIONS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    (a) In General.--Section 3326 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by inserting ``certain'' before 
        ``positions''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``appointed'' and all that follows 
                through ``Defense'' and inserting ``appointed to a 
                position in the excepted or competitive service 
                classified at or above GS-14 of the General Schedule 
                (or equivalent) in or under the Department of 
                Defense''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``for the 
                purpose'' and all that follows through ``Management''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
subchapter I of chapter 33 of such title is amended in the item 
relating to section 3326 by inserting ``certain'' before ``positions''.
                                 <all>
```
(October 31, 1963)

#### Leonard E. Webster, as Administrator of the Estate of Beulah M. Webster, Deceased, Appellant, v. State of New York (New York State Thruway Authority), Respondent.

Judgment unanimously modified on *852the law and facts to increase the amount of the judgment to $20,925 and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to appellant. Certain findings of fact modified» Memorandum: Plaintiff’s intestate was killed through the joint negligence of the State and a third party. At the time of her death she was 52 years old and was employed for nine months of the year. Her annual earnings were in excess of $2,000 and she had a life expectancy of 19.49 years. She and her husband were State employees. Week ends and during the Winter months they returned to their home in Cazenovia. Their joint earnings were deposited in a joint account. Husband and wife had purchased a lot and by their own labor (with minor exceptions) had erected thereon a prefabricated home which was nearing completion at the time of her death. We find the pecuniary loss for decedent’s wrongful death within the provisions of section 132 of Decedent Estate Law to be the sum of $30,925. Deducting therefrom the amount of $10,000 received by plaintiff from a joint tort-feasor fixes respondent’s liability to be $20,925. (Appeal by claimant from judgment of Court of Claims for claimant.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Bridger-Teton

Thunder 

Basin

Medicine-Bow

Medicine-Bow

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Yellowstone Newcastle

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse 

Land Use Plan Amendments

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundary

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundary

Withdrawn from Mineral Entry

Proposed Withdrawal from Mineral Entry

BLM and USFS Surface Lands

Sage-grouse Priority/Core Habitat Areas

Sage-grouse Connectivity Habitat Areas

Counties

Water

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 2-20: Alternative B

Areas Withdrawn 

from Mineral Entry