alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.56A

                    AMENDMENT AND ADDENDUM TO PROMISSORY NOTE

      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, SAC Holding Corporation, a Nevada
corporation ("Maker"), hereby amends that certain Promissory Note (the "Note")
dated as of January 29, 2001 in the original principal amount of $10,500,000
payable to the order of U-Haul International, Inc. ("Payee"), as follows.
Capitalized words used herein and not otherwise defined herein have the meaning
ascribed to such words in the Note.

      Section 2(a) of the Note is hereby amended to provide that effective as of
April 1, 2002, Basic Interest (which, for clarity, includes Pay Rate Interest
and Deferred Interest) is payable on a monthly basis, in arrears, on the first
business day of each month throughout the term of the Note.

      In addition, Section 2(e) of the Note is hereby amended to provide that
effective as of April 1, 2002, Cash Flow Contingent Interest is payable on a
monthly basis, in arrears, on the first business day of the month throughout the
term of the Note.

      The Note remains in full force and effect and is not amended in any
respect, except as expressly provided herein.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned executes this Amendment and Addendum
to Promissory Note as of April 16, 2002.

                                    SAC Holding Corporation

                                    By: ____________________________
                                          Bruce Brockhagen, Secretary


      Payee hereby agrees and consents to the above-described amendment to the
Note this 16th day of April, 2002.

                                    U-Haul International, Inc.


                                    By: ____________________________
                                          Gary B. Horton, Assistant
                                          Treasurer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9921 

To amend the Delta Development Act to include the parish of Terrebonne 

as a Delta Regional Authority area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2024 

Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana (for himself and Mr. SCALISE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Delta Development Act to include the parish 

of Terrebonne as a Delta Regional Authority area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELTA REGIONAL AUTHORITY AREAS. 

4 Section 4(2)(D) of the Delta Development Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 3121 note; Public Law 100–460) is amended by 

6 inserting ‘‘Terrebonne,’’ after ‘‘Webster,’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Appeal No. 76-400.

#### Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company *v.*E. W. Burman, Inc.

*Higgins, Cavanagh & Cooney, Kenneth P. Borden, Joseph V. Cavanagh,*for plaintiff.

*Alan P. Cusick,*for defendant.

The defendant’s motion for an extension of time to file its brief is granted. The brief shall be filed on or before June 20, 1977.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6257

CHARLES ARTHUR BENNETT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; W. K. JONES,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-95-226-5-BO)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Arthur Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bennett

v. Department of Corrections, No. CA-95-226-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 13,

1995). We deny Appellant's motions for default judgment and for

writ of habeas corpus, for court order, and for injunctive relief.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Elan Sigal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-f of RADA Electronic Industries
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2007
/s/ Elan Sigal*
---------------
Elan Sigal
Chief Financial Officer

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
```
#### PEOPLE v. NEW YORK BUILDING-LOAN BANKING CO. In re MARION’S PETITION.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Appeal from Special Term. Proceedings by the Seople of the state of New York against the few York Building-Loan Banking Company. Petition by Anna Marion, a stockholder, asking that the receiver of defendant be required to pay petitioner the excess between the amount paid by her to defendant and the amount paid by it on her behalf. From a decree determining the amount due petitioner,- she appeals. Modified. Charles R. Hall, for appellant. Charles W. Dayton, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in People v. N. Y. Building-Loan Banking Co. (Matter of Montague), 92 N. Y. Supp. 62, decided herewith, the order appealed from should be modified, by dismissing the application, and, as.so modified, affirmed, without costs.
AGREEMENT


     THIS
AGREEMENT is made as of the day of September 30, 2002, between
Ucino ("Ucino") and Jitsource, LLC. ("Jitsource")


W I T N E S S E T H:


        WHEREAS,
Ucino has a note receivable dated December 2, 2001 from Jitsource in the amount
of $84,000 plus interest which is due December 2, 2003; and 


        WHEREAS,
Jitsource has a note receivable dated December 20, 2001 from Padma Ventures in
the amount of $45,000 plus interest with payments on such note commencing
February 2003 and ending February 2007. 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, Ucino and
Jitsource agree as follows: 


        
1.     Ucino has agreed to accept the notice receivable that Jitsource has from
Padma Ventures in full satisfaction of the note receivable that Ucino has from Jitsource.
Jitsource agrees to assign its note receivable from Padma Ventures in return for such
satisfaction.


        
2.     This agreement shall be governed by and any questions arising hereunder shall
be construed and interpreted according to the laws of California, United States of America.


        
3.     All notices referred to herein shall be deemed to be sufficiently given if in writing
and sent by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to  Ucino
or to Jitsource, as the case may be, at their respective business addresses first
hereinabove given or at such other address or addresses as either party shall hereafter
designate by written notice.


        
4.     Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may be amended only by
an instrument in writing executed by Jitsource and Ucino.


        
5.      This Agreement and all Schedules attached hereto embody the entire
understanding of the parties and there are no other agreements or understandings, written
or oral, in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.  This Agreement
supersedes and terminates all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings,
arrangements and agreements among the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.


        
6.     No waiver by any party of any breach or default by any other party of nay such
other party's obligations under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other
breach or default of the same or any other nature.  No failure by nay party on any one or
more occasions to exercise any rights or remedy provided in this Agreement shall preclude






the
exercise of such right or remedy on any other occasion.


        
7.     This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterpart copies, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and
the same instrument.


        
8.     This Agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto, their successors and
assigns.


        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the days and year
first above written. 


	ATTEST:

	UCINO

By:  
/s/   Geral Calame


	ATTEST:

	JITSOURCE LLC


By:  /s/   Akhee Rahman
### §101916. Reasonableness of rates and charges

(a) In General.—A concession contract shall permit the concessioner to set reasonable and appropriate rates and charges for facilities, goods, and services provided to the public, subject to approval under subsection (b).

(b) Approval by Secretary Required.—

(1) Factors to consider.—A concessioner's rates and charges to the public shall be subject to approval by the Secretary. The approval process utilized by the Secretary shall be as prompt and as unburdensome to the concessioner as possible and shall rely on market forces to establish reasonableness of rates and charges to the maximum extent practicable. The Secretary shall approve rates and charges that the Secretary determines to be reasonable and appropriate. Unless otherwise provided in the concession contract, the reasonableness and appropriateness of rates and charges shall be determined primarily by comparison with those rates and charges for facilities, goods, and services of comparable character under similar conditions, with due consideration to the following factors and other factors deemed relevant by the Secretary:

(A) Length of season.

(B) Peakloads.

(C) Average percentage of occupancy.

(D) Accessibility.

(E) Availability and costs of labor and materials.

(F) Type of patronage.

(2) Rates and charges not to exceed market rates and charges.—Rates and charges may not exceed the market rates and charges for comparable facilities, goods, and services, after taking into account the factors referred to in paragraph (1).

(c) Implementation of Recommendations.—Not later than 6 months after receiving recommendations from the Advisory Board regarding concessioner rates and charges to the public, the Secretary shall implement the recommendations or report to Congress the reasons for not implementing the recommendations.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3145.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101916 | 16 U.S.C. 5955. | Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §406, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3510. |

Section
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-27-2000             JAN-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-1999             JAN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-27-2000             JAN-28-1999
<CASH>                                          16,404                  14,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,417                  68,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    433,082                 382,248
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               582,175                 492,528
<PP&E>                                         903,808                 817,893
<DEPRECIATION>                                 374,798                 345,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,270,323               1,025,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          351,895                 338,983
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        19,692                  19,473
<OTHER-SE>                                     683,002                 619,366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,270,323               1,025,130
<SALES>                                      3,672,413               3,266,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                        2,697,769               2,397,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,558,539               3,163,846
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,544                   1,787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                113,874                 103,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,900                  39,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,974                  63,358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,974                  63,358
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.77                    1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73                    1.64


</TABLE>
### §302904. Direct grants for the preservation of properties included on National Register

(a) Administration of Program.—The Secretary shall administer a program of direct grants for the preservation of properties included on the National Register.

(b) Available Amount.—Funds to support the program annually shall not exceed 10 percent of the amount appropriated annually for the Historic Preservation Fund.

(c) Uses of Grants.—

(1) In general.—Grants under this section may be made by the Secretary, in consultation with the appropriate State Historic Preservation Officer—

(A) for the preservation of—

(i) National Historic Landmarks that are threatened with demolition or impairment; and

(ii) historic property of World Heritage significance;

(B) for demonstration projects that will provide information concerning professional methods and techniques having application to historic property;

(C) for the training and development of skilled labor in trades and crafts, and in analysis and curation, relating to historic preservation; and

(D) to assist individuals or small businesses within any historic district included on the National Register to remain within the district.

(2) Limit on certain grants.—A grant may be made under subparagraph (A) or (D) of paragraph (1) only to the extent that the project cannot be carried out in as effective a manner through the use of an insured loan under section 303901 of this title.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3204.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302904(a) through (c)(1) | 16 U.S.C. 470a(e)(3)(A). | Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §101(e)(3)(A), (C), formerly §101(d)(3)(A), (C), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 915; Pub. L. 91–383, §11, as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1942; Pub. L. 93–54, §1(d), July 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 139; Pub. L. 96–205, title VI, §608(a)(1), (2), Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 92; Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §201(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2992; redesignated as §101(e)(3)(A), (C), Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4006(a)(1), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4755; Pub. L. 106–208, §5(a)(3), May 26, 2002, 114 Stat. 318. |
| 302904(c)(2) | 16 U.S.C. 470a(e)(3)(C). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "In addition to the programs under paragraphs (1) and (2)" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c)(1)(D), the word "individuals" is substituted for "persons" for clarity.
### SBRVB D AUGUS T 29 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTK4ENT O FTRANSPORTATIO N

'FFIC B O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C ' '^••^^'^ J OPERATION

' OFFIC E O FHEARING S j ' '''Afei^ORTA/'O N

I N TH E MATTE RO F CONTINENTA LAIRLINES , INC . •A A DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDMSNO . FAA-2011-077 5 ^i'^ f^-'O G i o Aq : 

## 33

NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designate da s Cas e No . 2009SW270097 ) ha s been assigne dto Administrativ e La

w Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . All futur e pleading s andothe r

communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e sei-ve do n th e Judge , th e FA

A Hearin g Docket , andth e other person s o n the attache dServic e List .

li e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e Law>rt^g e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

\FDM S NO . FAA.-2011-077 5 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Thoma s Newto n Boiling , Respondent' s Counse l Vic e Presiden t

an dAssociat e Genera l Counse l Unite dAirfine s an dContinenta l Airlines , Inc. , Responden t 1 1 W . Wacke r

Drive-16" ^ Floo r Chicago , I L6060 1 TEL : 312-997-806 8 FAX : 312-997-806 8 Ti mDufT , Comp/ainanf' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

Regiona l Counsel , ASW- 7 Southwes t

Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 Meacha mBlvd . Ft . Worth , T X 76193-000 7 TE L817-222-509 9 FA X 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney^Adviso r 202

- 366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier , us e tli

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. . Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 , Washington, D C 20591 ; Allention : Hearing Docke t Clerk . AGC-4:^0 .
#### WEED, Respondent, v. CLARK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

Action by William S. Weed against Cornelia Clark.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.

HOOKER, J., not voting.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0001347

08-DEC-2015

08:32 AM
#### § 903.761 Areas designated unsuitable for surface coal mining by act of Congress.

Part 761 of this chapter, *Areas Designated by Act of Congress,* applies to surface coal mining operations.
#### Elizabeth C. Duncan, Respondent, v National Council of Distributive Workers of America, Appellant.

Order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 7, 1977 and July 18, 1977, respectively, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Sutton, J., at Special Term. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disburse*932ments of this appeal. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Fein, Markewich, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                             Exhibit 15











Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that our report dated October 13, 1999 on our review of the interim
financial information of Dexter Corporation (the "Company") as of and for the
period ended September 30, 1999, and included in the Company's quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in its
registration statements on Form S-8, Registration Nos. 2-63959, 33-27597,
33-53307, 33-53309, 333-02985, 333-04081, 333-42663 and 333-76873. Pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be
considered a part of the registration statements prepared or certified by us
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Springfield, Massachusetts
November 5, 1999
### Subdivision 5—Federal Agency Historic Preservation Responsibilities