alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023136EN.01001001.xml

| 19.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/10

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11075 – EBERT HERA ESSER HOLDING / SERVICECO)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 136/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Ebert HERA Esser Holding GmbH (‘Ebert HERA’, Germany), |
| --- | --- |

—

Ebert HERA Esser Holding GmbH (‘Ebert HERA’, Germany),

| — | ServiceCo (the Netherlands). |
| --- | --- |

—

ServiceCo (the Netherlands).

Ebert HERA, through EHE Dutch Holding B.V., will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole ServiceCo.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Ebert HERA provides blue collar brownfield industrial and mechanical contracting services for heavy industry such as chemical plants, pharmaceutical plants, petrochemical plants and refineries in the Benelux and Germany, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ebert HERA provides blue collar brownfield industrial and mechanical contracting services for heavy industry such as chemical plants, pharmaceutical plants, petrochemical plants and refineries in the Benelux and Germany,

| — | ServiceCo will provide Engineering, Procurement, Contracting and Maintenance services to existing chemical plants currently supplied by Sitech Manufacturing Services C.V., Sitech Services B.V. and its affiliated companies (‘Sitech’) on the Chemelot Campus park in Geleen, the Netherlands. ServiceCo will be the result of a prior restructuring of Sitech. |
| --- | --- |

—

ServiceCo will provide Engineering, Procurement, Contracting and Maintenance services to existing chemical plants currently supplied by Sitech Manufacturing Services C.V., Sitech Services B.V. and its affiliated companies (‘Sitech’) on the Chemelot Campus park in Geleen, the Netherlands. ServiceCo will be the result of a prior restructuring of Sitech.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11075 – EBERT HERA ESSER HOLDING / SERVICECO

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
# C_2023215EN.01000101.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11072 – BLACKROCK / MUBADALA / GOLDMAN SACHS / EQUITIX / CALISEN / MAPLECO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 215/01)

On 2 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11072. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11072. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Jane Holmes, Executrix, etc., Respondent, *v.*Allen Wood, Appellant.

(Argued February 7, 1882;

decided February 28, 1882.)

The complaint in this action alleged an indebtedness to the defendant, of $12,500, payable according to the terms of a *651promissory note therein set forth; that the plaintiff paid, during a period of time particularly specified, certain sums of money; and that on the 27th of January, 1877, a computation was had, upon which it appeared that there was due and unpaid upon said note the sum of $382, which he paid in the belief that it was in fact due; that afterward he discovered that there had been omitted from said computation a payment made March 2, 1875, of $400, and another payment made May 6, 1875, of $500.02. That these payments, by mistake, were omitted from the computation; nor were they indorsed upon the note; nor did the plaintiff in any manner receive credit therefor; that the plaintiff paid these sums again to the defendant. Upon discovery of the mistake he demanded repayment which was refused by the defendant. For these items and the interest thereon the plaintiff demanded judgment.

The answer admits the note as described in the complaint, the computation of January 27,1877, the payment by the plaintiff of the amount then found due, and denies that any mistake was made or error committed in the computation, or that the plaintiff has overpaid the note, but does not deny that the items above referred to were omitted from the computation, or aver that they were indorsed upon the note; or that the plaintiff did, in any manner, receive credit for the same; nor does it deny that defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum claimed, or any other sum whatever, upon the matters alleged in the complaint. The case was tried before a referee. On trial, plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings, which was denied. The referee, however, found in favor of the plaintiff, on the evidence.

The court here held, that any other result than a judgment for plaintiff would have been contrary to the pleadings, and that, therefore, the .ruling of the referee, denying judgment thereon, was most favorable to defendant; but that it.was not necessary to consider that question, as the evidence was sufficient without regard to the admissions in the answer, to war- , rant the findings of the referee

*John JS. Butler*for appellant.

*J. Me Qui/fe*for respondent.

*652Daffforth, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 1615.6 Selective service number.

Every registrant shall be given a selective service number. The Social Security Account Number will not be used for this purpose.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 996 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 996

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Dr. Rudy 
                         Lombard Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2023

  Mr. Carter of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, Mr. 
  Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Graves of Louisiana, Ms. Letlow, and Mr. 
   Scalise) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Dr. Rudy 
                         Lombard Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. RUDY LOMBARD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3901 MacArthur Blvd., in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dr. Rudy Lombard Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Rudy 
Lombard Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1665.3 Access to the accounting of disclosures from records.

Rules governing the granting of access to the accounting of disclosure are the same as those for granting accesses to the records (including verification of identity) outlined in § 1665.2.
# EUR-Lex - 61988J0088 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 61988J0088

**Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 June 1989. - REWE-Handelsgesellschaft Nord mbH v Überwachungsstelle für Milcherzeugnisse und Handelsklassen. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesverwaltungsgericht - Germany. - Agriculture - Water content of frozen poultry - Conditions under which checks are conducted. - Case 88/88. **

*
European Court reports 1989 Page 01959 Pub.RJ Page Pub somm *

Summary
Parties
Operative part

## Keywords

++++

Agriculture - Common organization of the markets - Poultry meat - Marketing standards - Water content of frozen and deep-frozen chickens, hens and cocks - Conditions under which checks are conducted - Determination by the Member States - Temporary suspension of marketing - Permissibility - Limits

( Council Regulation No 2967/76, Art . 3(2 ) )

Summary

The second indent of the second subparagraph of Article 3(2 ) of Regulation No 2967/76, laying down common standards for the water content of frozen and deep-frozen chickens, hens and cocks, provides that the Member States are to adopt practical measures for checks on the water content of frozen poultry and states that the Member States are to ensure that those checks do not result in unjustified obstacles being placed in the way of the marketing of the poultry concerned . That provision does not preclude national legislation under which the marketing of any batch from which a sample has been taken must be prohibited until the inspection procedure has been completed . However, such suspension of marketing may not exceed the time needed for an effective inspection .

## Summary

Parties

In Case 88/88

## Parties

REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Bundesverwaltungsgericht ( Federal Administrative Court ) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between

REWE-Handelsgesellschaft Nord mbH

and

UEberwachungsstelle fuer Milcherzeugnisse und Handelsklassen ( Supervisory Bureau for Dairy Products and Goods Classification )

on the interpretation of the second indent of the second subparagraph of Article 3(2 ) of Council Regulation No 2967/76 of 23 November 1976 laying down common standards for the water content of frozen and deep-frozen chickens, hens and cocks ( Official Journal 1976, L 339, p . 1 ),

THE COURT ( Second Chamber )

composed of : T . F . O' Higgins, President of the Chamber, G . F . Mancini and F . A . Schockweiler, Judges,

( the grounds of the judgment are not reproduced )

in answer to the question referred to it by the Bundesverwaltungsgericht, by order of 10 December 1987, hereby rules :

Operative part

The second indent of the second subparagraph of Article 3(2 ) of Regulation No 2967/76 does not prohibit national rules under which any batch of goods from which a sample has been taken must be withheld from the market until the inspection procedure has been completed . Nevertheless, such a suspension of marketing may not exceed the time needed for an effective inspection .

## Operative part
#### § 922.819 Special performance standards—auger mining.

Part 819 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Auger Mining,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining operations which include auger mining.
### §60113. Data policy for Landsat 7

(a) Landsat 7 Data Policy.—The Landsat Program Management, in consultation with other appropriate United States Government agencies, shall develop a data policy for Landsat 7 which should—

(1) ensure that unenhanced data are available to all users at the cost of fulfilling user requests;

(2) ensure timely and dependable delivery of unenhanced data to the full spectrum of civilian, national security, commercial, and foreign users and the National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive;

(3) ensure that the United States retains ownership of all unenhanced data generated by Landsat 7;

(4) support the development of the commercial market for remote sensing data;

(5) ensure that the provision of commercial value-added services based on remote sensing data remains exclusively the function of the private sector; and

(6) to the extent possible, ensure that the data distribution system for Landsat 7 is compatible with the Earth Observing System Data and Information System.

(b) Additional Data Policy Considerations.—In addition, the data policy for Landsat 7 may provide for—

(1) United States private sector entities to operate ground receiving stations in the United States for Landsat 7 data;

(2) other means for direct access by private sector entities to unenhanced data from Landsat 7; and

(3) the United States Government to charge a per image fee, license fee, or other such fee to entities operating ground receiving stations or distributing Landsat 7 data.

(Pub. L. 111–314, §3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3413.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60113 | 15 U.S.C. 5615(a), (b). | Pub. L. 102–555, title I, §105(a), (b), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4170. |

Section
EXHIBIT 31

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Leslie J. Kessler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Water Chef, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





                                            /s/   Leslie J. Kessler
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                  Leslie J. Kessler, President
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2007
#### Abe Spigner, Respondent, v. Philip Kupersmit et al., Appellants.

Motion to vacate order dated October 5, 1960, dismissing the appeal, and to restore the appeal to the calendar, granted. Appellants are directed to perfect the appeal and to be ready to argue or submit it at the December Term, beginning November 28, 1960. The appeal is ordered to be placed on said calendar for said term. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before November 10, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 11
                           DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share data)


    Quarter Ended June 30,                      1998         1997
                                                ----         ----

    Net income                                 $ 832       $1,133
    Plus: amortization of redeemable stock                     12
                                               -----        -----
    Income available to common stockholders      832        1,145
                                               =====        =====
    Weighted average number of shares          6,291        4,613
                                               =====        =====
    Basic earnings per share                   $0.13        $0.25
                                               =====        =====
    Shares attributable to deferred
     compensation plans and stock
     options and warrants                        542          588
                                                ====         ====
    Diluted earnings per share:                $0.12        $0.22
                                                ====         ====
# C_2023190EN.01001201.xml

| 31.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/12

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 190/09)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Crotone - Rome Fiumicino and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 1 September 2023 to 31 August 2026 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) |
| Air transport and licensing department |
| Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 |
| 00185 Rome |
| ITALY |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Crotone - Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

From 1 September 2023 to 31 August 2026

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)

Air transport and licensing department

Viale Castro Pretorio, 118

00185 Rome

ITALY

Tel. +39 0644596247

Email: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Discovery Oil Ltd, a Delaware corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 22, 2006

/s/ Andrew Ippolito

________________________________

Andrew Ippolito

President, Director, and Chief Financial Officer