alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013038EN.01002102.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/21

---

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 — Adriatica di Navigazione and Comitato ‘Venezia Vuole Vivere’ v Commission

(Case T-231/00) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of aid paid - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 38/37

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Adriatica di Navigazione SpA (Venice, Italy) and Comitato ‘Venezia Vuole Vivere’ (Venice) (represented by: M. Siragusa and F. Moretti, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, agent, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicants: Italian Republic (represented: initially by U. Leanza, then by I. Braguglia, then by R. Adam, and lastly by I. Bruni, agents, and by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Intervener in support of the applicants

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The plea of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is considered with the substance of the case. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The plea of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is considered with the substance of the case.

| 2. | The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 3. | Adriatica di Navigazione SpA and the Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’ shall bear their own costs and pay those of the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Adriatica di Navigazione SpA and the Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’ shall bear their own costs and pay those of the Commission.

| 4. | The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 316, 4.11.2000.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul Ross, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 787]

Appeal from a judgment *1244of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J), rendered July 20, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]), assault in the second degree (§ 120.05 [2]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02 [1]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in failing to charge assault in the third degree under Penal Law § 120.00 (3) as a lesser included offense of assault in the first or second degree *(see People v White,*29 AD3d 457, 458 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 819 [2006]; *People v Pross,*302 AD2d 895, 898 [2003], *lv denied*99 NY2d 657 [2003]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The jury was entitled to credit the testimony of the victim over that of defendant *(see People v Mallory,*191 AD2d 970 [1993]), and “it cannot be said that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” *(People v Woods,*26 AD3d 818, 819 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 765 [2006]; *see generally Bleakley,*69 NY2d at 495). Defendant’s general objection to the testimony of the paramedic concerning the severity of the victim’s injury is insufficient to preserve for our review defendant’s present contention with respect to that testimony *(see People v Singletary,*270 AD2d 903 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 838 [2000]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the court properly exercised its discretion in limiting the cross-examination of the victim *(see People v Jorge,*1 AD3d 121, 122 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 629 [2004]). Even assuming, arguendo, that the court erred in allowing the prosecutor to ask leading questions during his direct examination of the police officer who interviewed defendant, we conclude that the error is harmless *(see People v Konsistorum,*3 AD3d 394, 395 [2004], *lv denied*2 NY3d 763 [2004]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Fahey and Green, JJ.
Map 3-5: Pinedale Field Office

Livestock Grazing Allotments

0 6 12 18 24

Kilometers

0 6 12 18 24

Miles

1

Pinedale Field Office Boundary

Pinedale Grazing Allotments

County Boundaries

Townships

State/US Highways

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

MAP

AREA

U T

Pinedale

Sublette

Sweetwater

Wyoming Sage Grouse

Land Use Plan Amendments

R 108 W

R 107 W

R 106 W

R 105 W

I D A H O

T

25

N

T

26

N

T

27

N

T

28

N

T

29

N

T

30

N

T

31

N

T

32

N

T

33

N

T

34

N

T

35

N

T

36

N

T

37

N

R 114 W

R 113 W R 112 W

R 111 W

R 110 W R 109 W

¬«351

£¤191

R 115 W

£¤191

£¤189

£¤189

£¤189
Map 3-16: BLM Special Designations and

Management Areas

0 20 40 60 80

Kilometers

0 20 40 60 80

Miles

1

LUP Amendments Planning Area

BLM Field Office Boundaries

Forest Service Planning Unit Boundaries

Suitable Wild & Scenic Rivers

Wilderness Study Areas (WSA)

Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)

Other Management Areas (OMA)

BLM & USFS Surface Management

County Boundaries

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments

Final Environmental Impact Statement - May 2015

W Y O M I N G

M T

I D

M A P A R E A

Crook

Weston

Sundance

Rock Springs

Field Office

§ ̈¦80

U T

C O

N E

S D

Newcastle

Lusk

Douglas

Casper

Cheyenne

Wheatland Torrington

Laramie

Rawlins

Rock Springs

Green River

Evanston

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Rawlins Field Offi ce

Casper Field Offi ce

Newcastle

Field Office

Pinedale

Field Office

Kemmerer

Field Office

Bridger -

Teton

N.F.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Thunder

Basin

N.G.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine

Bow

N.F.

Medicine Bow

N.F.

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

Platte

G

o

s

h

e

n

Alb

a

n

y

L

a

r

a

mie

C

o

n

v

e

r

s

e

Nio

b

r

a

r

a

Nat rona

Carbon

S

w

e

etw

ate

r

C

a

r

b

o

n

Sublette

Lincoln

T

eto

n

Fr

e

m

o

nt

Wyoming Sage Grouse Land Use Plan Amendments
**EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

       In connection with the annual reportof CNB Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W. JenningsDuncan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the CNB Corporation, certifyto the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

| 1.     | The  above-listed Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2.     | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-K fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |

 
| Date:  March  10, 2009 | */s/W. Jennings, Duncan*                  W. Jennings Duncan  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                                                                                                                                               |
#### § 77.506-1 Electric equipment and circuits; overload and short circuit protection; minimum requirements.

Devices providing either short circuit protection or protection against overload shall conform to the minimum requirements for protection of electric circuits and equipment of the National Electric Code, 1968.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 *Notice is hereby given*
                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for the institutions listed below, intends to terminate its receivership for said institutions. Notice of Intent To Terminate Receiverships
Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Date of
                             appointment 
                             of receiver10109
Bradford Bank
Baltimore
MD
08/28/200910110
Affinity Bank
Ventura
CA
08/28/200910156
Greater Atlantic Bank
Reston
VA
12/04/200910184
George Washington Savings Bank
Orland Park
IL
02/19/201010192
Sun American Bank
Boca Raton
FL
03/05/201010250
Nevada Security Bank
Reno
NV
06/18/201010254
USA Bank
Port Chester
NY
07/09/201010263
First National Bank of the South
Spartanburg
SC
07/16/201010419
The First State Bank
Stockbridge
GA
01/20/2012( print page 83555)10195
The Park Avenue Bank
New York
NY
03/12/201010217
Tamalpais Bank
San Rafael
CA
04/16/201010312
Darby Bank and Trust Company
Vidalia
GA
11/12/201010525
Proficio Bank
Cottonwood Heights
UT
03/03/201710533
Resolute Bank
Maumee
OH
10/25/2019
 The liquidation of the assets for each receivership has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors. Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receiverships will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receiverships shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of any of the receiverships, such comment must be made in writing, identify the receivership to which the comment pertains, and be sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201. No comments concerning the termination of the above-mentioned receiverships will be considered which are not sent within this time frame. Authority:
                    12 U.S.C. 1819. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Dated at Washington, DC, on December 16, 2020. James P. Sheesley, Assistant Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2020-28134 Filed 12-21-20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANTS 10-KSB AS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      10,348,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,992,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (190,047)
<INVENTORY>                                    871,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,293,791
<PP&E>                                       4,352,492
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,036,918)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,774,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,019,542
<BONDS>                                        130,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       355,643
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,556,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,774,147
<SALES>                                     22,768,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,768,664
<CGS>                                       12,870,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,870,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,342,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (90,667)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,555,108
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,048,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,507,108
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,507,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Kazimer Jamontas, appellee, v. Freda Wincon and James Wincon, appellants.

Gen. No. 29,858.

Motion to vacate judgment by confession. Motion denied.' Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John J. Rooney, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

Novak & Novak, for appellants.

Harold 0. Mulks, for appellee.

Mr,. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis
J. Allingham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By        /s/ DENNIS J. ALLINGHAM
  -------------------------------------------
Dennis J. Allingham
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
May 12, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. and will be retained by Lifecore
Biomedical, Inc., and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
FREMONT

CARBON

SWEETWATER

ALBANY

NATRONA

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

CONVERSE

CROOK

UINTA

LARAMIE

WESTON

PLATTE

GOSHEN

NIOBRARA

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦25

§ ̈¦90

Rawlins

Casper

Rock Springs

Kemmerer

Pinedale

Newcastle

Yellowstone

National Park

Lusk

Yoder

Hanna

Baggs

Afton

Hulett

Glendo

Casper

Douglas

Bairoil

Rawlins

Laramie

Superior

Sundance

Saratoga

La Barge Guernsey

Pinedale

Kemmerer

Evanston

Cheyenne

Wheatland

Wamsutter

Cokeville

Chugwater

Big Piney

Newcastle

Torrington

Rock River

Pine Bluffs

Green River

Medicine Bow

Fort Laramie

Elk Mountain

Rock Springs

Grand Encampment

0 25 50 100

Miles

0 25 50 100

Kilometers

Wyoming Sage-Grouse RMP 

Amendments Planning Area

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF 

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

RMP Amendments Planning Area

VRM I

VRM II

VRM III

VRM IV

Field Office Boundaries

Counties

Interstate

State / US Hwy

Cities

Map 11: Visual Resource 

Management Classifications
Spotlight on Youth Homicide Victims

Data from the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports show that youth homicide victimizations remain low, but a 

larger proportion of youth are killed by a firearm

Two-thirds of victims younger than age 6 were killed 

by a family member in 2015 

0 to 5 6 to 11 12 to 14 15 to 17 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

66%

32%

2%

58%

28%

13%

28%

44%

28%

12%

68%

19%

Family Acquaintance Stranger

Victim age

Percent of homicide victims The number of homicide victims ages 15-17 has declined 

but the proportion killed by a firearm remains high 

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Homicide victims 

ages 15–17

Percent of victims killed

 with a firearm

62%

82%

Across age groups, the number of youth homicide 

victims declined 30% or more since 1993 

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

Homicide victims

Age 6−11

Age 12−14

Age 15−17

Age 0−5

A greater proportion of black homicide victims ages 

15-17 than white victims were killed by a firearm 

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Percent of homicide victims 

ages 15−17 killed by a firearm 

Black

White

In 2015, most youth homicide victims were very young 

(ages 0–5) or older teens (ages 15–17) 

Weapon

Race

Gender

Age

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

43% 9% 7% 41%

70% 30%

46% 50% 4%

49% 20% 31%

0–5 6–11 12–14 15–17

Male Female

White Black Other

Firearm Personal Other

Percent of youth homicide victims

Access more information on youth homicide victims

n Review FAQs about youth homicide victims

n Analyze data with Easy Access to the FBI’s 

Supplementary Homicide Reports

Notes: This publication was prepared by Julie Boc and Charles 

Puzzanchera, National Center for Juvenile Justice, with funds 

provided by OJJDP through grant #2016-JF-FX-K001. November 

2017.

Data source: Federal Bureau of Investigation. Supplementary 

Homicide Reports [machine-readable data files]. Washington, DC: 

FBI (producer). 

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb

Notes: Other race includes American Indian/Alaskan Natives, and Asian/

Pacific Islanders. Personal weapons include hands, fists, and feet.
### §1545. Congressional priority procedures for joint resolution or bill

#### (a) Time requirement; referral to Congressional committee; single report

Any joint resolution or bill introduced pursuant to section 1544(b) of this title at least thirty calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, as the case may be, and such committee shall report one such joint resolution or bill, together with its recommendations, not later than twenty-four calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section, unless such House shall otherwise determine by the yeas and nays.

#### (b) Pending business; vote

Any joint resolution or bill so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question (in the case of the Senate the time for debate shall be equally divided between the proponents and the opponents), and shall be voted on within three calendar days thereafter, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.

#### (c) Referral to other House committee

Such a joint resolution or bill passed by one House shall be referred to the committee of the other House named in subsection (a) and shall be reported out not later than fourteen calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in section 1544(b) of this title. The joint resolution or bill so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question and shall be voted on within three calendar days after it has been reported, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.

#### (d) Disagreement between Houses

In the case of any disagreement between the two Houses of Congress with respect to a joint resolution or bill passed by both Houses, conferees shall be promptly appointed and the committee of conference shall make and file a report with respect to such resolution or bill not later than four calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in section 1544(b) of this title. In the event the conferees are unable to agree within 48 hours, they shall report back to their respective Houses in disagreement. Notwithstanding any rule in either House concerning the printing of conference reports in the Record or concerning any delay in the consideration of such reports, such report shall be acted on by both Houses not later than the expiration of such sixty-day period.

(Pub. L. 93–148, §6, Nov. 7, 1973, 87 Stat. 557.)